Attached files

file filename
EX-31.1 - EX 31.1 CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A) OR 15D-14(A) - Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.swft-ex311x6302017.htm
EX-32.1 - EX 32.1 CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SEC 1350 - Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.swft-ex321x6302017.htm
EX-31.2 - EX 31.2 CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A) OR 15D-14 - Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.swft-ex312x6302017.htm
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

ý    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017
or
o    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number: 001-35007
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
swiftfulllogonotagbwa17.jpg
 Swift Transportation Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Delaware
 
20-5589597
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2200 South 75th Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85043
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(602) 269-9700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Large accelerated filer
 
ý
  
Accelerated filer
 
o
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer
 
o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  
Smaller reporting company
 
o
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Emerging growth company
 
o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No  ý 
The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock as of July 17, 2017 was 84,171,377 and the number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Class B common stock as of July 17, 2017 was 49,741,938.
 
 
 
 
 




SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY


QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PAGE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
 
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
The following glossary provides definitions for certain acronyms and terms used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These acronyms and terms are specific to our company, commonly used in our industry, or are otherwise frequently used throughout our document.
 
Term
 
Definition
Swift/the Company/Management/We/Us/Our
 
Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, these terms represent Swift Transportation Company and its subsidiaries. Swift Transportation Company is the holding company for Swift Transportation Co., LLC (a Delaware limited liability company) and Interstate Equipment Leasing, LLC.
2007 Transactions
 
In April 2007, Jerry Moyes and his wife contributed their ownership of all of the issued and outstanding shares of IEL (defined below) to Swift Corporation in exchange for additional Swift Corporation shares. In May 2007, the Moyes Affiliates (defined below), contributed their shares of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. common stock to Swift Corporation in exchange for additional Swift Corporation shares. Swift Corporation then completed its acquisition of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. through a merger on May 10, 2007, thereby acquiring the remaining outstanding shares of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. common stock. Upon completion of the 2007 Transactions, Swift Transportation Co., Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Swift Corporation. At the close of the market on May 10, 2007, the common stock of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. ceased trading on NASDAQ (defined below).
2013 RSA
 
Second Amended and Restated Receivables Sale Agreement, entered into in 2013 by SRCII (defined below), with unrelated financial entities, "The Purchasers." The 2013 RSA was later replaced by the 2015 RSA.
2015 RSA
 
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Receivables Sale Agreement, entered into in 2015 by SRCII (defined below), with unrelated financial entities, "The Purchasers"
2015 Agreement
 
The Company's Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
ASC
 
Accounting Standards Codification
ASU
 
Accounting Standards Update
Board
 
Swift's Board of Directors
CSA
 
Compliance Safety Accountability
Deadhead
 
Tractor movement without hauling freight (unpaid miles driven)
DLC
 
Deferred Loan Cost
DOE
 
United States Department of Energy
EBITDA
 
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (a non-GAAP measure)
EPS
 
Earnings Per Share
FASB
 
Financial Accounting Standards Board
FLSA
 
Fair Labor Standards Act
GAAP
 
United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
IEL
 
Interstate Equipment Leasing, LLC (formerly Interstate Equipment Leasing, Inc.)
IPO
 
Initial Public Offering
Knight
 
Knight Transportation, Inc.
LIBOR
 
London InterBank Offered Rate

3



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

GLOSSARY OF TERMS — CONTINUED
The following glossary provides definitions for certain acronyms and terms used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These acronyms and terms are specific to our company, commonly used in our industry, or are otherwise frequently used throughout our document.
 
Term
 
Definition
Moyes Affiliates
 
Jerry Moyes, Vickie Moyes, The Jerry and Vickie Moyes Family Trust dated December 11, 1987, and various Moyes children’s trusts
NASDAQ
 
National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations
NLRB
 
National Labor Relations Board
Quarter or QTD
 
Quarter-to-date, or three months ended
Revenue xFSR
 
Revenue, Excluding Fuel Surcharge Revenue
Revolver
 
Revolving line of credit under the 2015 Agreement
SEC
 
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
SRCII
 
Swift Receivables Company II, LLC
Term Loan A
 
The Company's first lien term loan A under the 2015 Agreement
The Purchasers
 
Unrelated financial entities in the 2013 RSA and 2015 RSA, which were accounts receivable securitization agreements entered into by SRCII
YTD
 
Year-to-date, or six months ended

4


SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
(In thousands, except share data)
ASSETS
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
42,884

 
$
89,391

Cash and cash equivalents – restricted
58,994

 
57,046

Restricted investments, held to maturity, amortized cost
22,025

 
22,717

Accounts receivable, net
401,261

 
408,593

Equipment sales receivable
444

 

Income tax refund receivable
2,766

 
206

Inventories and supplies
16,699

 
16,630

Assets held for sale
1,652

 
6,969

Prepaid taxes, licenses, insurance, and other
45,796

 
47,038

Current portion of notes receivable
5,805

 
6,961

Total current assets
598,326

 
655,551

Property and equipment, at cost:
 
 
 
Revenue and service equipment
2,214,224

 
2,266,137

Land
132,335

 
132,084

Facilities and improvements
288,626

 
281,390

Furniture and office equipment
110,043

 
113,880

Total property and equipment
2,745,228

 
2,793,491

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
(1,286,656
)
 
(1,244,890
)
Net property and equipment
1,458,572

 
1,548,601

Other assets
22,636

 
21,953

Intangible assets, net
257,898

 
266,305

Goodwill
253,256

 
253,256

Total assets
$
2,590,688

 
$
2,745,666

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
133,731

 
$
115,063

Accrued liabilities
142,405

 
132,712

Current portion of claims accruals
87,275

 
80,866

Current portion of long-term debt
3,419

 
8,459

Current portion of capital lease obligations
45,194

 
72,473

Total current liabilities
412,024

 
409,573

Revolving line of credit

 
130,000

Long-term debt, less current portion
449,268

 
493,346

Capital lease obligations, less current portion
143,648

 
161,463

Claims accruals, less current portion
173,269

 
165,726

Deferred income taxes
398,083

 
427,722

Accounts receivable securitization
294,464

 
279,285

Other liabilities
4,792

 
6,296

Total liabilities
1,875,548

 
2,073,411

Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 10 and 11)

 

Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized 10,000,000 shares; none issued

 

Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized 500,000,000 shares; 84,179,118 and 83,299,118 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
842

 
833

Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized 250,000,000 shares; 49,741,938 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
497

 
497

Additional paid-in capital
695,276

 
701,065

Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit)
18,423

 
(30,242
)
Noncontrolling interest
102

 
102

Total stockholders’ equity
715,140

 
672,255

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
2,590,688

 
$
2,745,666

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5




SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY




CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
 
Quarter Ended June 30,
 
Year-to-Date June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
(In thousands, except per share data)
Operating revenue:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue, excluding fuel surcharge revenue
$
898,945

 
$
935,409

 
$
1,770,035

 
$
1,842,322

Fuel surcharge revenue
94,113

 
76,445

 
186,854

 
137,355

Operating revenue
993,058

 
1,011,854

 
1,956,889

 
1,979,677

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Salaries, wages, and employee benefits
284,437

 
287,100

 
567,775

 
575,733

Operating supplies and expenses
87,952

 
87,220

 
192,071

 
177,435

Fuel
94,485

 
87,371

 
189,446

 
162,358

Purchased transportation
275,380

 
283,602

 
540,891

 
550,911

Rental expense
57,385

 
57,070

 
113,079

 
113,322

Insurance and claims
52,070

 
45,806

 
102,246

 
93,516

Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment
62,353

 
64,688

 
130,122

 
131,639

Amortization of intangibles
4,203

 
4,203

 
8,407

 
8,407

Impairments
187

 

 
187

 

Gain on disposal of property and equipment
(3,438
)
 
(4,963
)
 
(7,633
)
 
(11,289
)
Communication and utilities
8,145

 
6,947

 
16,648

 
13,847

Operating taxes and licenses
17,738

 
18,605

 
35,904

 
37,110

Total operating expenses
940,897

 
937,649

 
1,889,143

 
1,852,989

Operating income
52,161

 
74,205

 
67,746

 
126,688

Other expenses (income):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
6,862

 
7,567

 
14,383

 
16,161

Interest income
(581
)
 
(636
)
 
(1,069
)
 
(1,387
)
Merger transaction costs
5,157

 

 
7,314

 

Legal settlements and reserves

 
3,000

 

 
3,000

Other income, net
(1,195
)
 
(1,094
)
 
(2,378
)
 
(1,870
)
Total other expenses, net
10,243

 
8,837

 
18,250

 
15,904

Income before income taxes
41,918

 
65,368

 
49,496

 
110,784

Income tax expense
15,621

 
22,472

 
17,992

 
35,983

Net income
$
26,297

 
$
42,896

 
$
31,504

 
$
74,801

Basic earnings per share
$
0.20

 
$
0.32

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.55

Diluted earnings per share
$
0.20

 
$
0.32

 
$
0.23

 
$
0.55

Shares used in per share calculations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
133,544

 
134,439

 
133,347

 
135,476

Diluted
134,507

 
135,651

 
134,365

 
136,745

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


6




SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY




CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
 
Class A
Common Stock
 
Class B
Common Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in Capital
 
(Accumulated Deficit) Retained Earnings
 
Noncontrolling Interest
 
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
 
Shares
 
Par Value
 
Shares
 
Par Value
 
 
 
 
 
(In thousands, except share data)
Balances, December 31, 2016
83,299,118

 
$
833

 
49,741,938

 
$
497

 
$
701,065

 
$
(30,242
)
 
$
102

 
$
672,255

Common stock issued under stock plans
852,214

 
9

 


 


 
6,296

 


 


 
6,305

Stock-based compensation expense


 


 


 


 
4,118

 
368

 


 
4,486

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation


 


 


 


 
(16,793
)
 
16,793

 


 

Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
27,786

 

 


 


 
590

 


 


 
590

Net income


 


 


 


 


 
31,504

 


 
31,504

Balances, June 30, 2017
84,179,118

 
$
842

 
49,741,938

 
$
497

 
$
695,276

 
$
18,423

 
$
102

 
$
715,140

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


7




SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY




CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
 
Year-to-Date June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net income
$
31,504

 
$
74,801

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization of property, equipment, and intangibles
138,529

 
140,046

Amortization of debt issuance costs, and other
670

 
667

Gain on disposal of property and equipment, less write-off of totaled tractors
(6,011
)
 
(9,632
)
Impairments
187

 

Deferred income taxes
(29,941
)
 
(18,239
)
Reduction of losses on accounts receivable
(897
)
 
(1,245
)
Stock-based compensation expense
4,715

 
3,541

Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
8,229

 
6,244

Inventories and supplies
(69
)
 
2,588

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
(1,318
)
 
12,650

Other assets
108

 
2,562

Accounts payable, and accrued and other liabilities
37,256

 
29,987

Net cash provided by operating activities
182,962

 
243,970

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
(Increase) decrease in cash and cash equivalents – restricted
(1,948
)
 
132

Proceeds from maturities of investments
13,175

 
13,289

Purchases of investments
(12,623
)
 
(12,997
)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
56,684

 
71,315

Capital expenditures
(86,919
)
 
(68,962
)
Payments received on notes receivable
4,868

 
2,961

Expenditures on assets held for sale
(8,363
)
 
(12,503
)
Payments received on assets held for sale
9,553

 
12,620

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
(25,573
)
 
5,855

Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
Repayment of long-term debt and capital leases
(94,398
)
 
(112,528
)
Net repayments on revolving line of credit
(130,000
)
 
(115,000
)
Borrowings under accounts receivable securitization
60,000

 
100,000

Repayment of accounts receivable securitization
(45,000
)
 
(25,000
)
Proceeds from common stock issued
6,895

 
3,681

Repurchases of Class A common stock

 
(90,000
)
Share withholding for taxes due on equity awards
(1,393
)
 
(436
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(203,896
)
 
(239,283
)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(46,507
)
 
10,542

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
89,391

 
107,590

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
42,884

 
$
118,132

 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

8




SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY




CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
 
Year-to-Date June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
(In thousands)
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
 
 
 
Cash paid during the period for:
 
 
 
Interest
$
13,904

 
$
15,913

Income taxes
49,622

 
30,485

Non-cash investing activities:
 
 
 
Equipment purchase accrual
$
16,842

 
$
3,759

Notes receivable from sale of assets
4,592

 
288

Equipment sales receivables
444

 
1,197

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


9




SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY




Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
Note 1 — Introduction and Basis of Presentation
Certain acronyms and terms used throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are specific to our company, commonly used in our industry, or are otherwise frequently used throughout our document. Definitions for these acronyms and terms are provided in the "Glossary of Terms," available in the front of this document.
Description of Business
Swift is a transportation solutions provider, headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona. As of June 30, 2017, the Company's fleet of revenue equipment included 18,612 tractors (comprised of 14,130 company tractors and 4,482 owner-operator tractors), 62,580 trailers, and 9,130 intermodal containers. The Company’s four reportable segments are Truckload, Dedicated, Refrigerated (formerly "Swift Refrigerated"), and Intermodal.
Merger
On April 10, 2017, Swift announced an all-stock merger agreement with Knight, which was unanimously approved by the board of directors of each company and is expected to close during the quarter ended September 30, 2017. The combined company will be named Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. ("Knight-Swift"). Knight is expected to be the accounting acquirer. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, each Swift share will convert into 0.72 shares of Knight-Swift by means of a reverse stock split. Each share of Knight will be exchanged for one Knight-Swift share. Based on the $30.65 closing price of Knight shares on April 7, 2017, the last trading day prior to the announcement, the implied value per share of Swift is $22.07. Upon closing of the transaction, Swift stockholders will own approximately 54.0% and Knight stockholders will own approximately 46.0% of the combined company. Based on Knight’s closing share price on April 7, 2017, the number of combined company shares expected to be outstanding after closing and the combined net debt of Swift and Knight as of December 31, 2016, the combined company would have an implied enterprise value of approximately $6.0 billion.
The merger agreement provides for certain termination rights for both Knight and Swift. Upon termination of the merger agreement under certain specified circumstances, Swift may be required to pay Knight a termination fee of $89.1 million and Knight may be required to pay Swift a termination fee of $75.3 million. In addition, if the merger agreement is terminated because of a failure of either Knight’s or Swift’s stockholders to approve the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the other party may be required to reimburse transaction expenses up to $10.0 million.
Seasonality
In the truckload industry, results of operations generally show a seasonal pattern. As customers ramp up for the year-end holiday season, the late third quarter and fourth quarter have historically been the Company's strongest volume periods. As customers reduce shipments after the winter holiday season, the first quarter has historically been a lower-volume quarter than the other three quarters. In recent years, the macro consumer buying patterns combined with shippers’ supply chain management, which historically contributed to the fourth quarter "peak" season, continued to evolve. As a result, the Company's fourth quarter 2016, 2015, and 2014 volumes were more evenly distributed throughout the quarter, rather than peaking early in the quarter. In the eastern and mid-western United States, and to a lesser extent in the western United States, the Company's equipment utilization typically declines and operating expenses generally increase during the winter season. This tends to be attributed to declines in fuel efficiency from engine idling and increases in accident frequency, claims, and equipment repairs from severe weather. The Company's revenue is directly related to shippers' available working days. As such, curtailed operations and vacation shutdowns around the holidays may affect the Company's revenue. From time to time, the Company also suffers short-term impacts from severe weather and similar events, such as tornadoes, hurricanes, blizzards, ice storms, floods, fires, earthquakes, and explosions that could add volatility to, or harm, the Company's results of operations.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Swift Transportation Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. In management's opinion, these consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP and include all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the periods presented.

10




SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY




Changes in Presentation
Segment Reorganization — During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, the Company reorganized its reportable segments to reflect management’s revised reporting structure of its Dedicated and Refrigerated (formerly “Swift Refrigerated”) reportable segments.  In connection with the reorganization, the operations of the Company's dedicated grocery line of business, which were previously reported within the Company’s Dedicated segment, are now reported within the Company's Refrigerated segment.  This resulted in all temperature-controlled lines of business reporting under the Refrigerated segment. Prior periods have been retrospectively adjusted to align with the current period presentation.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement — In March 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-based Payment Accounting, which amended ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. The amendments in this ASU are intended to simplify various aspects of accounting for stock-based compensation, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as equity or liability, as well as classification of activities within the statement of cash flows.  For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and the interim periods within those fiscal years. 
The Company adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The amendments that affected the Company's financial statements are discussed below.
Accounting for Income Tax Benefits/Deficiencies: All excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (including tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards) should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The tax effects of exercised or vested awards should be treated as discrete items in the reporting period in which they occur. An entity should also recognize excess tax benefits regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period. Modified retrospective application is required, by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity.
Upon adoption, the Company reclassified approximately $16.8 million in historical net tax benefit/deficiency amounts previously recorded within "Additional paid-in capital" into "Accumulated deficit." Starting January 1, 2017, tax benefit/deficiency amounts are recorded in "Income tax expense" in the consolidated income statements.
Classification of Excess Tax Benefits on the Statement of Cash Flows: Excess tax benefits should be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity. Application is permitted to be prospective or retrospective.
GAAP previously required classification within cash flows from financing activities. The Company retrospectively adjusted the year-to-date June 30, 2016 statement of cash flows to align with the current period presentation by increasing cash flows from operating activities by $0.5 million and correspondingly decreasing cash flows from financing activities by $0.5 million, reflecting the amount of excess tax benefits previously presented for that period.
Forfeitures: An entity can make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest (prior GAAP) or account for forfeitures when they occur. Modified retrospective application is required, by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity.
Upon adoption, the Company transitioned to accounting for forfeitures when they occur. This resulted in approximately a $0.4 million (net of income tax) cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings/accumulated deficit to catch-up the previously unrecognized stock-based compensation associated with historical assumed forfeiture rates. Starting January 1, 2017, forfeitures are recorded as adjustments to stock-based compensation as they occur.
Classification of Employee Taxes Paid on the Statement of Cash Flows When an Employer Withholds Shares for Tax-withholding purposes: Cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes should be classified as a financing activity. Retrospective application is required.
In 2016, the Company began allowing certain members of management to have shares withheld for taxes when their restricted stock awards and performance units vest. As such, upon adopting the amendments in this ASU, the Company reclassified the amounts out of cash flows from operating activities and into cash flows from financing activities for year-to-date June 30, 2016 to align with the current period presentation. For year-to-date June 30, 2016, the amount was approximately $0.4 million.

11



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



 
Note 2 — Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, Not Yet Adopted
Date Issued
 
Reference
 
Description
 
Expected Adoption Date and Method
 
Financial Statement Impact
May 2016
 
2016-12: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) – Narrow-scope Improvements and Practical Expedients
 
The amendments in this ASU clarify certain aspects regarding the collectibility criterion, sales taxes collected from customers, noncash consideration, contract modifications, and completed contracts at transition. It additionally clarifies that retrospective application only requires disclosure of the accounting change effect on prior periods presented, not on the period of adoption.
 
January 2018, Modified retrospective
 
Currently under evaluation (1)
April 2016
 
2016-10: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) – Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing
 
The amendments in this ASU clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. The amendments do not change the core principle of the guidance.
 
January 2018, Modified retrospective
 
Currently under evaluation (1)
March 2016
 
2016-08: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) – Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)
 
The amendments in this ASU are intended to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations, but do not change the core principle of the guidance.
 
January 2018, Modified retrospective
 
Currently under evaluation (1)
February 2016
 
2016-02: Leases (Topic 842)
 
The new standard requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities arising from both operating and financing leases on the balance sheet. Lessor accounting for leases is largely unaffected by the new guidance.
 
January 2019, Modified retrospective
 
Currently under evaluation; expected to be material, but not yet quantifiable.
August 2015
 
2015-14: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) – Deferral of the Effective Date
 
This ASU deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 (Topic 606) to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.
 
January 2018, Modified retrospective
 
Currently under evaluation (1)
____________
(1)
Management is in the diagnostic phase of assessing the financial and business impacts of implementing ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, including identifying revenue sources within the Company's lines of business, reviewing a sample of contracts, and developing a preliminary assessment. Based upon these preliminary procedures, management anticipates that the following key considerations will impact the Company's accounting and reporting under the new standard:
identification of what constitutes a contract in Swift's business practices,
variability in individual contracts, such as customer-specific terms that may vary from the master agreement,
principal versus agent determinations,
timing of revenue recognition (for example, point-in-time versus over time and/or accelerated versus deferred),
single versus multiple performance obligations,
new/changed estimates and management judgments (for example, system estimation of in-transit accruals versus manual estimation),
disaggregation of revenue by category within segments, and
others.
Management expects that there will also be changes in sales, contracting, accounting, reporting, tax, debt covenants, and other business processes, policies, and controls, as a result of implementing ASC Topic 606. The Company is currently implementing a new ERP system and transacting a merger (as discussed in Note 1), which will also affect the implementation process.

12



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



Based on the information currently available from the diagnostic phase, management cannot yet determine the quantitative impact on the financial statements; however, the impact is expected to be immaterial (potentially with changes only to the timing of revenue recognition between reportable periods, as well as changes in the requirements for accounting policy and other new disclosures). The Company is transitioning into the design and planning phase of implementing ASC Topic 606. Since management is continuing to evaluate the impact of ASC Topic 606, disclosures around their preliminary assessments are subject to change.
 
Note 3 — Restricted Investments
The following table presents the cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and temporary losses, and estimated fair value of the Company’s restricted investments:

June 30, 2017
 
 
 
Gross Unrealized
 
 
 
Cost or Amortized
Cost
 
Gains
 
Temporary
Losses
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
(In thousands)
United States corporate securities
$
16,056

 
$

 
$
(12
)
 
$
16,044

Municipal bonds
4,689

 
1

 
(1
)
 
4,689

Negotiable certificate of deposits
1,280

 

 

 
1,280

Restricted investments, held to maturity
$
22,025

 
$
1

 
$
(13
)
 
$
22,013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
 
Gross Unrealized
 
 
 
Cost or Amortized
Cost
 
Gains
 
Temporary
Losses
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
(In thousands)
United States corporate securities
$
16,432

 
$

 
$
(23
)
 
$
16,409

Municipal bonds
4,760

 

 
(6
)
 
4,754

Negotiable certificate of deposits
1,525

 

 

 
1,525

Restricted investments, held to maturity
$
22,717

 
$

 
$
(29
)
 
$
22,688

Refer to Note 14 for additional information regarding fair value measurements of restricted investments.
As of June 30, 2017, the contractual maturities of the restricted investments were one year or less. There were 26 securities and 42 securities that were in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The Company did not recognize any impairment losses for year-to-date June 30, 2017 or 2016.
 
Note 4 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
There were no goodwill impairments recorded year-to-date June 30, 2017 or 2016. Other intangible asset balances were as follows:
 
June 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
(In thousands)
Customer Relationships:
 
 
 
Gross carrying value
$
275,324

 
$
275,324

Accumulated amortization
(198,463
)
 
(190,056
)
Customer relationships, net
76,861

 
85,268

Trade Name:
 
 
 
Gross carrying value
181,037

 
181,037

Intangible assets, net
$
257,898

 
$
266,305


13



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



The following table presents amortization of intangible assets related to the 2007 Transactions and intangible assets existing prior to the 2007 Transactions:
 
Quarter Ended June 30,
 
Year-to-Date June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
(In thousands)
Amortization of intangible assets related to the 2007 Transactions
$
3,912

 
$
3,912

 
$
7,824

 
$
7,824

Amortization related to intangible assets existing prior to the 2007 Transactions
291

 
291

 
583

 
583

Amortization of intangibles
$
4,203

 
$
4,203

 
$
8,407

 
$
8,407

 
Note 5 — Income Taxes
Effective Tax Rate — The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 was 37.3%, which was higher than management's expectation of 36.0%. The difference was primarily due to transaction costs relating to the merger with Knight capitalized for tax purposes, partially offset by benefits relating to stock compensation deductions recognized as discrete items in the quarter. Refer to Note 1 for further details regarding the Company's merger with Knight.
The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 was 34.4%, which was lower than management's expectation of 37.5%, primarily due to additional Federal income tax credits realized as discrete items in the quarter.
The year-to-date June 30, 2017 effective tax rate was 36.4%, which was higher than management's expectation of 36.0%. The difference was primarily due to transaction costs relating to the merger with Knight capitalized for tax purposes, partially offset by benefits relating to stock compensation deductions recognized as discrete items in the period.
The year-to-date June 30, 2016 effective tax rate was 32.5%, which was lower than management's expectation of 37.5%, primarily due to certain income tax credits in the Company's foreign and domestic subsidiaries and a reduction in the uncertain tax position reserve, realized as discrete items.
Interest and Penalties — Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were approximately $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The Company does not anticipate a decrease of unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months.
Tax Examinations — Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries are currently under examination by various state jurisdictions for tax years ranging from 2012 through 2015. At the completion of these examinations, management does not expect any adjustments that would have a material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate. Years subsequent to 2012 remain subject to examination.
 
Note 6 — Accounts Receivable Securitization
On December 10, 2015, SRCII, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into the 2015 RSA, which further amended the 2013 RSA. The parties to the 2015 RSA include SRCII as the seller, Swift Transportation Services, LLC as the servicer, the various conduit purchasers, the various related committed purchasers, the various purchaser agents, the various letters of credit participants, and PNC Bank, National Association as the issuing bank of letters of credit and as administrator. Pursuant to the 2015 RSA, the Company's receivable originator subsidiaries sell, on a revolving basis, undivided interests in all of their eligible accounts receivable to SRCII. In turn, SRCII sells a variable percentage ownership interest in the eligible accounts receivable to the various purchasers. The facility qualifies for treatment as a secured borrowing under ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. As such, outstanding amounts are classified as liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 14 for information regarding the fair value of the 2015 RSA.
As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, interest accrued on the aggregate principal balance at a rate of 1.8% and 1.3%, respectively. Program fees and unused commitment fees are recorded in "Interest expense" in the consolidated income statements. The Company incurred program fees of $1.6 million and $1.0 million related to the 2015 RSA during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company incurred program fees of $3.0 million and $1.9 million related to the 2015 RSA during year-to-date June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The 2015 RSA is subject to customary fees and contains various customary affirmative and negative covenants, representations and warranties, and default and termination provisions. Collections on the underlying receivables by the Company are held for the benefit of SRCII and the Purchasers in the facility and are unavailable to satisfy claims of the Company and its subsidiaries.

14



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



 
Note 7 — Debt and Financing
Other than the Company’s accounts receivable securitization, as discussed in Note 6, and its outstanding capital lease obligations as discussed in Note 9, the Company's long-term debt consisted of the following:
 
June 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
(In thousands)
Term Loan A, due July 2020, net of $1,151 and $1,338 DLCs as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively (1)
$
448,849

 
$
492,912

Other
3,838

 
8,893

Long-term debt
452,687

 
501,805

Less: current portion of long-term debt
(3,419
)
 
(8,459
)
Long-term debt, less current portion
$
449,268

 
$
493,346

 
June 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
(In thousands)
Long-term debt
$
452,687

 
$
501,805

Revolver, due July 2020 (1) (2)

 
130,000

Long-term debt, including revolving line of credit
$
452,687

 
$
631,805

____________
(1)
Refer to Note 14 for information regarding the fair value of long-term debt.
(2)
The Company also had outstanding letters of credit under the Revolver, primarily related to workers' compensation and self-insurance liabilities of $89.4 million at June 30, 2017 and $97.0 million at December 31, 2016.
Credit Agreement
On July 27, 2015, the Company entered into the 2015 Agreement, which includes a Revolver and a Term Loan A. The following table presents the key terms of the 2015 Agreement:
Description
 
Term Loan A
 
Revolver (2)
 
 
(Dollars in thousands)
Maximum borrowing capacity
 
$680,000
 
$600,000
Final maturity date
 
July 27, 2020
 
July 27, 2020
Interest rate base
 
LIBOR
 
LIBOR
LIBOR floor
 
—%
 
—%
Interest rate minimum margin (1)
 
1.50%
 
1.50%
Interest rate maximum margin (1)
 
2.25%
 
2.25%
Minimum principal payment – amount (3)
 
$6,625
 
$—
Minimum principal payment – frequency
 
Quarterly
 
Once
Minimum principal payment – commencement date (3)
 
December 31,
2015
 
July 27,
2020
____________
(1)
The interest rate margin for the Term Loan A and Revolver is based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2017, interest accrued at 2.62% on the Term Loan A and 2.49% on the Revolver. As of December 31, 2016, interest accrued at 2.18% on the Term Loan A and 2.18% on the Revolver.

15



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



(2)
The commitment fee for the unused portion of the Revolver is based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio and ranges from 0.25% to 0.35%. As of June 30, 2017, commitment fees on the unused portion of the Revolver accrued at 0.25% and outstanding letter of credit fees accrued at 1.50%. As of December 31, 2016, commitment fees on the unused portion of the Revolver accrued at 0.25% and outstanding letter of credit fees accrued at 1.50%.
(3)
Commencing in March 2017, the minimum required quarterly payment amount on the Term Loan A was $12.3 million, at which it would have remained until final maturity. However, as of January 2017, the Company has voluntarily prepaid all minimum quarterly principal payments through final maturity.
The Revolver and Term Loan A of the 2015 Agreement contain certain financial covenants with respect to a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio. The 2015 Agreement provides flexibility regarding the use of proceeds from asset sales, payment of dividends, stock repurchases, and equipment financing. In addition to the financial covenants, the 2015 Agreement includes customary events of default, including a change in control default and certain affirmative and negative covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions, subject to certain exceptions, on incremental indebtedness, asset sales, certain restricted payments (including dividends and stock repurchases), certain incremental investments or advances, transactions with affiliates, engagement in additional business activities, and prepayment of certain other indebtedness. The anticipated merger with Knight discussed in Note 1 is not expected to be deemed a change in control, as defined in the 2015 Agreement.
Borrowings under the 2015 Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and are guaranteed by Swift Transportation Company, IEL, Central Refrigerated Transportation, LLC and its subsidiaries, and Swift Transportation Co., LLC and its domestic subsidiaries (other than its captive insurance subsidiaries, driver academy subsidiary, and its bankruptcy-remote special purpose subsidiary).
 
Note 8 — Deferred Loan Costs
The following table presents the classification of DLCs in the Company's consolidated balance sheets:
 
June 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
(In thousands)
ASSETS:
 
 
 
Other assets
$
1,005

 
$
1,169

LIABILITIES:
 
 
 
Long-term debt, less current portion
1,151

 
1,338

Accounts receivable securitization
536

 
715

Total DLCs
$
2,692

 
$
3,222

 
Note 9 — Leases
The Company finances a portion of its revenue equipment under capital and operating leases and certain terminals under operating leases.
Capital Leases (as Lessee) — The Company’s capital leases are typically structured with balloon payments at the end of the lease term equal to the residual value the Company is contracted to receive from certain equipment manufacturers upon sale or trade back to the manufacturers. If the Company does not receive proceeds of the contracted residual value from the manufacturer, the Company is still obligated to make the balloon payment at the end of the lease term. Certain leases contain renewal or fixed price purchase options. The present value of obligations under capital leases is included under "Current portion of capital lease obligations" and "Capital lease obligations, less current portion" in the consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2017, the leases were collateralized by revenue equipment with a cost of $260.8 million and accumulated amortization of $78.9 million. As of December 31, 2016, the leases were collateralized by revenue equipment with a cost of $319.8 million and accumulated amortization of $97.0 million. Amortization of equipment under capital leases is included in "Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment" in the Company’s consolidated income statements.
Operating Leases (as Lessee) — Rent expense related to operating leases was $57.4 million and $57.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Year-to-date June 30, 2017 and 2016 rent expense related to operating leases was $113.1 million and $113.3 million, respectively.

16



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



 
Note 10 — Purchase Commitments
As of June 30, 2017, the Company's outstanding commitments to acquire revenue equipment were as follows:
remainder of 2017: $276.0 million ($208.2 million of which were tractor commitments), and
thereafter: none.
The Company typically has the option to cancel tractor purchase orders with 60 to 90 days' notice prior to the scheduled production, although there is a certain group of tractors we are committed to purchase in 2017 that cannot be canceled (even with advance notice). The notice period to cancel currently committed tractor purchase orders has lapsed for 90.7% of the total tractor commitments outstanding as of June 30, 2017. Purchases are expected to be financed by the combination of operating leases, capital leases, debt, proceeds from sales of existing equipment, and cash flows from operations.
As of June 30, 2017, the Company's outstanding purchase commitments to acquire facilities, information technology, and other non-revenue equipment were as follows:
remainder of 2017: $6.6 million
2018 and 2019: $8.8 million,
2020 and 2021: $3.5 million, and
thereafter: $0.4 million.
Factors such as potential future terminal expansions and changes in information technology infrastructure may change the amount of such expenditures.
 
Note 11 — Contingencies and Legal Proceedings
Accounting Policy
The Company is involved in certain claims and pending litigation primarily arising in the normal course of business. The majority of these claims relate to workers' compensation, auto collision and liability, physical damage, and cargo damage. The Company accrues for the uninsured portion of claims losses and the gross amount of other losses when the likelihood of the loss is probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. These accruals are based on management's best estimate within a possible range of loss. When there is no amount within the range of loss that appears to be a better estimate than any other amount, then management accrues to the low end of the range. Legal fees are expensed as incurred.
When it is reasonably possible that exposure exists in excess of the related accrual (which could be no accrual), management discloses an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss, unless an estimate cannot be determined.
If the likelihood of a loss is remote, the Company does not accrue for the loss. However if the likelihood of a loss is remote, but it is at least reasonably possible that one or more future confirming events may materially change management's estimate within twelve months from the date of the financial statements, management discloses an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss, unless an estimate cannot be determined.
Legal Proceedings
Information is provided below regarding the nature, status, and contingent loss amounts, if any, associated with the Company's pending legal matters. There are inherent uncertainties in these legal matters, some of which are beyond management's control, making the ultimate outcomes difficult to predict. Moreover, management's views and estimates related to these matters may change in the future, as new events and circumstances arise and the matters continue to develop.
For the matters below, an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss cannot be determined for certain cases because, among other reasons, (1) the proceedings are in various stages that do not allow for assessment; (2) damages have not been sought; (3) damages are unsupported and/or exaggerated; (4) there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals; and/or (5) there are significant factual issues to be resolved.
Based on currently available information, and in certain cases, advice of outside counsel, management does not believe that loss contingencies arising from pending matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company's overall financial position, after taking into consideration any existing accruals. However, actual outcomes could be material to the Company's operating results or liquidity for any particular period.




17



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED




EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION AND PAY PRACTICES MATTERS
Aggregate information regarding accruals for the below employee compensation and pay practices matters:
Aggregate accrual
 
Aggregate range of loss in excess of accrual
 
Explanation if no accrual has been made
$0.5 million
 
$—
-
$—
 
For certain matters, it is not probable that a loss was incurred and/or the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated. For those matters, no accrual has been made.
 
California Wage, Meal, and Rest: Driver Class Actions
The plaintiffs generally allege one or more of the following: that the Company 1) failed to pay the California minimum wage; 2) failed to provide proper meal and rest periods; 3) failed to timely pay wages upon separation from employment; 4) failed to pay for all hours worked; 5) failed to pay overtime; 6) failed to properly reimburse work-related expenses; and 7) failed to provide accurate wage statements.
Plaintiff(s)
 
Defendant(s)
 
Date instituted
 
Court or agency currently pending in
John Burnell (1)
 
Swift Transportation Co., Inc
 
March 22, 2010
 
United States District Court for the Central District of California
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
James R. Rudsell (1)
 
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Swift Transportation Company
 
April 5, 2012
 
United States District Court for the Central District of California
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lawrence Peck (1)
 
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
 
September 25, 2014
 
United States District Court for the Central District of California
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lawrence Peck (1)(2)
 
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, et al.
 
November 20, 2014
 
Superior Court of California, County of Riverside
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sadashiv Mares (1)
 
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
 
February 27, 2015
 
United States District Court for the Central District of California
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rafael McKinsty(1)
 
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, et al.
 
April 15, 2015
 
United States District Court for the Central District of California
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thor Nilsen (1)
 
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
 
October 15, 2015
 
United States District Court for the Central District of California
Recent Developments and Current Status
Before and during 2016, the Rudsell, Peck, Peck PAGA, Mares, McKinsty, and Nilsen complaints were stayed, pending resolution of earlier-filed cases. In May 2016, the Burnell plaintiffs were denied class certification. Their subsequent petition to appeal the decertification order was also denied. Following the Burnell plaintiffs' failure to certify the class, the stays on certain cases were lifted. The Peck case is currently in discovery. The parties in the Mares and McKinsty cases completed class certification briefing during the first half of 2017.  On May 15, 2017, the court held oral argument on both the Mares and McKinsty Motions for Class Certification.  On May 23, 2017, the court denied the Mares Motion for Class Certification.  The Mares plaintiffs have filed a petition with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to appeal the court’s denial of class certification.  On July 13, 2017, the court denied the McKinsty Motion for Class Certification. Based on the current procedural nature of the cases, the final disposition of the matter and impact to the Company cannot be determined at this time. The likelihood that a loss has been incurred is remote.
 

18



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



California Wage, Meal, and Rest: Yard Hostler Class Actions
The plaintiffs, representing yard hostlers employed by the Company in California, generally allege one or more of the following: that the Company 1) failed to pay minimum wage; 2) failed to pay overtime and doubletime wages required by California law; 3) failed to provide accurate, itemized wage statements; 4) failed to timely pay wages upon separation from employment; 5) failed to reimburse for business expenses; and 6) failed to provide proper meal and rest periods.
Plaintiff(s)
 
Defendant(s)
 
Date instituted
 
Court or agency currently pending in
Grant Fritsch (1)
 
Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC and Swift Transportation Company
 
January 28, 2016
 
Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bill Barker, Tab Bachman, and William Yingling (1)
 
Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
 
April 1, 2016
 
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Recent Developments and Current Status
On July 17, 2017, the Fritsch plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification. The Barker complaint is currently in discovery. The Company retains all of its defenses against liability and damages related to these lawsuits. Additionally, the Company intends to vigorously defend against the merits of the claims and to challenge certification. The final disposition of these matters and the impact on the Company cannot be determined at this time. The likelihood that a loss has been incurred is remote.
 
Arizona Fair Labor Standards Act Class Action
The plaintiff alleges that the Company violated the FLSA by failing to pay its trainee drivers minimum wage for all work performed and by failing to pay overtime.
Plaintiff(s)
 
Defendant(s)
 
Date instituted
 
Court or agency currently pending in
Pamela Julian (1)
 
Swift Transportation Inc., et al.
 
December 29, 2015
 
United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Recent Developments and Current Status
In March 2016, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff's overtime claims, which was granted by the district court in May 2016. The parties completed briefing on the plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Class Certification and are awaiting a ruling on the Motion from the Court. The Company retains all of its defenses against liability and damages for the remaining claims. Additionally, the Company intends to vigorously defend against the merits of the claims and to challenge certification. The final disposition of the matter and the impact on the Company cannot be determined at this time. The likelihood that a loss has been incurred is remote.
 
Washington Overtime Class Actions
The plaintiffs allege one or more of the following, pertaining to Washington state-based drivers: that the Company 1) failed to pay minimum wage; 2) failed to pay overtime; 3) failed to pay all wages due at established pay periods; 4) failed to provide proper meal and rest periods; 5) failed to provide accurate wage statements; and 6) unlawfully deducted from employee wages.
Plaintiff(s)
 
Defendant(s)
 
Date instituted
 
Court or agency currently pending in
Troy Slack (1)
 
Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC and Swift Transportation Corporation
 
September 9, 2011
 
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Julie Hedglin (1)
 
Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC and Swift Transportation Corporation
 
January 14, 2016
 
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
Recent Developments and Current Status
The parties in the Slack matter recently completed dispositive motion briefing. On June 15, 2017, the parties engaged in a mediation, but it was unsuccessful. The case is scheduled for trial in September 2017. The parties in the Hedglin matter will be preparing class certification briefing beginning in August 2017. The Company retains all of its defenses against liability and damages for both matters. Additionally, the Company intends to vigorously defend against the merits of the claims and to challenge certification. The final disposition of the matter and the impact on the Company cannot be determined at this time. The likelihood that a loss has been incurred is probable.
___________
(1)
Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated.
(2)
Peck Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA") complaint.    


19



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



OWNER-OPERATOR MATTERS
Aggregate information regarding accruals for the below owner-operator matters:
Aggregate accrual
 
Aggregate range of loss in excess of accrual
 
Explanation if no accrual has been made
$36.7 million
 
$—
-
$—
 
For certain matters, it is not probable that a loss was incurred and/or the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated. For those matters, no accrual has been made.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Arizona Owner-operator Class Action
The putative class alleges that the Company improperly compensated owner-operators (later expanding the class to include employee drivers) using the contracted and industry standard remuneration based upon dispatched miles, instead of using a method of calculating mileage that the plaintiffs allege would be more accurate.
Plaintiff(s)
 
Defendant(s)
 
Date instituted
 
Court or agency currently pending in
Leonel Garza (1)
 
Swift Transportation Co., Inc.
 
January 30, 2004
 
Maricopa County Superior Court
Recent Developments and Current Status
The original trial court's decision was to deny class certification of the owner-operators, which was reversed and reinstated several times by various courts prior to 2016. The class is currently certified, based on an appellate court's decision from July 2016. The Company filed a petition for review with the Arizona Supreme Court in August 2016, which was denied in January 2017. The matter will now proceed in the Maricopa County Superior Court. The final disposition of the matter and impact to the Company cannot be determined at this time. The likelihood that a loss has been incurred is remote.
 
Ninth Circuit Owner-operator Misclassification Class Action
The putative class alleges that the Company misclassified owner-operators as independent contractors in violation of the FLSA and various state laws, and that such owner-operators should be considered employees. The lawsuit also raises certain related issues with respect to the lease agreements that certain owner-operators have entered into with IEL.
Plaintiff(s)
 
Defendant(s)
 
Date instituted
 
Court or agency currently pending in
Joseph Sheer, Virginia Van Dusen, Jose Motolinia, Vickii Schwalm, Peter Wood (1)
 
Swift Transportation Co., Inc., Interstate Equipment Leasing, Inc., Jerry Moyes, and Chad Killebrew
 
December 22, 2009
 
Unites States District Court of Arizona and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Recent Developments and Current Status
For several years, the parties have been arguing over the proper venue in which to proceed. The plaintiffs argue that they signed contracts of employment, thus exempting them from arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act, and claim that their case should be heard in court by a judge. The Company takes the position that these individuals signed independent contractor agreements and therefore can properly be required to submit their claims to arbitration. In January 2017, the district court issued an order finding that the plaintiffs had signed contracts of employment and thus the case could properly proceed in court. The Company has appealed this decision to the Ninth Circuit and the district court stayed the proceedings, pending resolution of the appeal. The Company intends to vigorously defend against any proceedings. The final disposition of the matter and impact to the Company cannot be determined at this time. The likelihood that a loss has been incurred is remote.
 

20



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



Utah Collective and Individual Arbitration
The plaintiffs allege that the Central Parties (defined below) misclassified owner-operator drivers as independent contractors and were therefore liable to these drivers for minimum wages and other employee benefits under the FLSA. The complaint also alleges a federal forced labor claim under U.S.C. §1589 and §1595, as well as fraud and other state-law claims.
Plaintiff(s)
 
Defendant(s)
 
Date instituted
 
Court or agency currently pending in
Gabriel Ciluffo, Kevin Shire, and Bryan Ratterree (1)
 
Central Refrigerated Service, Inc., Central Leasing, Inc., Jon Isaacson, and Jerry Moyes (the "Central Parties"), as well as Swift Transportation Company
 
June 1, 2012
 
American Arbitration Association
Recent Developments and Current Status
In June 2016, mediation commenced, but there was ultimately no settlement of the matter. In October 2016, the arbitrator ruled that approximately 1,300 Central Refrigerated Service, Inc. drivers were improperly classified as independent contractors, when they should have been classified and compensated as employees. The arbitrator ruled that damages could ultimately be assessed in a collective proceeding and denied the Company's motion to decertify the collective proceeding. Based upon the October 2016 arbitration ruling, the Company increased its legal accrual related to this matter for the quarter ended September 30, 2016. On April 14, 2017, the Company proposed a tentative settlement arrangement, which was finalized by and between the parties on April 28, 2017, subject to final court approval. As such, the Company further increased its legal accrual for the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The likelihood that a loss has been incurred is probable.
___________
(1)
Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated.
EMPLOYEE HIRING PRACTICES MATTERS
Aggregate information regarding accruals for the below employee hiring practices matters:
Aggregate accrual
 
Aggregate range of loss in excess of accrual
 
Explanation if no accrual has been made
$—
 
$—
-
$—
 
It is not probable that a loss was incurred and/or the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated for these matters.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indiana Fair Credit Reporting Act Class Action
The plaintiff alleges that Central Refrigerated Service, Inc. violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to provide job applicants with adverse action notices and copies of their consumer reports and statements of rights.
Plaintiff(s)
 
Defendant(s)
 
Date instituted
 
Court or agency currently pending in
Melvin Banks (1)
 
Central Refrigerated Service, Inc.
 
March 18, 2015
 
United States District Court for the District of Utah
Recent Developments and Current Status
On May 2, 2017, the court certified the class. The parties will next move into merits discovery. The Company retains all of its defenses against liability and damages. Additionally, the Company intends to vigorously defend against the merits of the claims. The final disposition of the matter and the impact on the Company cannot be determined at this time. The likelihood that a loss has been incurred is remote.
 

21



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



California Class and Collective Action for Pre-employment Physical Testing
The plaintiff alleges that pre-employment tests of physical strength administered by a third party on behalf of Central Refrigerated Service, Inc. had an unlawfully discriminatory impact on female applicants and applicants over the age of 40. The suit seeks damages under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the age Discrimination Act, and parallel California state law provisions, including the California Fair Employment and Housing Act.
Plaintiff(s)
 
Defendant(s)
 
Date instituted
 
Court or agency currently pending in
Robin Anderson (1)
 
Central Refrigerated Service, Inc., Workwell Systems, Inc., and Swift Transportation Company
 
October 6, 2014
 
United States District Court for the Central District of California
Recent Developments and Current Status
Litigation is at a very preliminary stage and no trial date has been set. The plaintiff's renewed motion for class certification was denied by the court on July 6, 2017. The Company intends to vigorously defend against the merits of the plaintiff's claims and to oppose certification of any class of plaintiffs. The final disposition of this case and the financial impact cannot be determined at this time. The likelihood that a loss has been incurred is remote.
___________
(1)
Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated.
SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
Aggregate information regarding accruals for the below shareholder matters:
Aggregate accrual
 
Aggregate range of loss in excess of accrual
 
Explanation if no accrual has been made
$—
 
$—
-
$—
 
It is not probable that a loss was incurred and/or the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated for these matters.
 
Securities Trading Policy Civil Lawsuit
The complaint, initially filed as a confidential filing, is a purported derivative action alleging that the individual members of the Company's Board breached their fiduciary duties related to the Company's administration of its Securities Trading Policy and certain compensation actions related to Jerry Moyes.
Plaintiff(s)
 
Defendant(s)
 
Date instituted
 
Court or agency currently pending in
Shiva Stein (1)
 
Jerry Moyes et al. and Swift Transportation Company as nominal defendant
 
February 9, 2017
 
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware
Recent Developments and Current Status
The Company filed a motion to dismiss the case, which was fully briefed and argued before the court. On July 19, 2017, the court dismissed the case. The likelihood that a loss has been incurred is remote.
 

22



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



Complaints Regarding the Knight-Swift Merger
The plaintiffs are company shareholders who allege that the defendants violated federal securities laws by filing a false and misleading Form S-4 Registration Statement with the SEC in connection with the proposed merger between the Company and Knight Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff(s)
 
Defendant(s)
 
Date instituted
 
Court or agency currently pending in
Matthew Sciabacucchi
 
Swift Transportation Company, Richard H. Dozer, Glenn Brown, José Cárdenas, Jerry Moyes, William Riley III, David Vander Ploeg, Bishop Merger Sub, Inc., and Knight Transportation, Inc.
 
May 31, 2017
 
United States District Court for the District of Arizona
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gaylen A. Peterson
 
Swift Transportation Company, Richard H. Dozer, Glenn Brown, José Cárdenas, Jerry Moyes, William Riley III, and David Vander Ploeg
 
June 29, 2017
 
United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Recent Developments and Current Status
The Company has been served with the complaint for the Sciabacucchi matter and is in the process of preparing a response. The final disposition of these matters and the impact on the Company cannot be determined at this time. The likelihood that a loss has been incurred is probable, but not yet estimable.
 
___________
(1)
Derivatively on behalf of Swift Transportation Company
Other Contingencies
Demand for Inspection of Books and Records During 2016, the Company received several shareholder demands requesting to inspect the Company's books and records, pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law ("Section 220").  The demands relate to the shareholders' alleged investigation pertaining to whether the Board and Jerry Moyes have breached their fiduciary duties with respect to matters that have been publicly disclosed concerning the Company's securities trading policy, limitations on the pledging of Company stock on margin, share repurchases, the status of Board members as independent directors, and other related matters. The Company has responded to the shareholders' requests received thus far. See related stockholder derivative lawsuit, above: Shiva Stein derivatively on behalf of Swift Transportation Company v. Jerry Moyes et al. and Swift Transportation Company as nominal defendant.
In February 2017, the Company received a shareholder demand under Section 220 for books and records related to an alleged investigation into whether the Board breached its fiduciary duties in connection with the September 8, 2016 retirement agreement between the Company and Mr. Moyes. The Company has responded to this request.
Any future disposition or resolution of these matters cannot be determined at this time.
Environmental
The Company's tractors and trailers are involved in motor vehicle accidents, and experience damage, mechanical failures, and cargo issues as an incidental part of its normal course of operations.  From time to time, these matters result in the discharge of diesel fuel, motor oil, or other hazardous materials into the environment.  Depending on local regulations and who is determined to be at fault, the Company is sometimes responsible for the clean-up costs associated with these discharges.  As of June 30, 2017, the Company's estimate for its total legal liability for all such clean-up and remediation costs was approximately $1.0 million in the aggregate for all current and prior year claims. 

23



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



 
Note 12 — Share Repurchase Programs
The following table presents the Company's repurchases of its Class A common stock under the respective share repurchase programs, net of advisory fees:
 
 
 
 
Quarter Ended June 30,
 
Year-to-Date June 30,
Share Repurchase Program
 
2016
 
2016
Authorized Amount
 
Board Approval Date
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
(In thousands)
$100,000
 
September 24, 2015
 

 
$

 
2,221

 
$
30,000

$150,000
 
February 22, 2016
 
2,828

 
$
45,000

 
3,731

 
$
60,000

 
 
 
 
2,828

 
$
45,000

 
5,952

 
$
90,000

No share repurchases were made year-to-date June 30, 2017. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $62.9 million of shares remained available under the $150.0 million share repurchase program and no shares remained available under the $100.0 million share repurchase program.
 
Note 13 — Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
The following table reconciles basic weighted average shares outstanding to diluted weighted average shares outstanding:
 
Quarter Ended June 30,
 
Year-to-Date June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
(In thousands)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
133,544

 
134,439

 
133,347

 
135,476

Dilutive effect of stock options
963

 
1,212

 
1,018

 
1,269

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
134,507

 
135,651

 
134,365

 
136,745

Anti-dilutive shares excluded from the dilutive-effect calculation (1)
86

 
637

 
152

 
643

____________
(1)
Shares were excluded from the dilutive-effect calculation because the outstanding options' exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Company's common shares during the period.

24



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



 
Note 14 — Fair Value Measurement
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments: 
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Carrying
Value
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted investments (1)
$
22,025

 
$
22,013

 
$
22,717

 
$
22,688

Financial Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Term Loan A, due July 2020 (2)
448,849

 
450,000

 
492,912

 
494,250

2015 RSA, due January 2019 (3)
294,464

 
295,000

 
279,285

 
280,000

Revolver, due July 2020

 

 
130,000

 
130,000

____________
The carrying amounts of the financial instruments shown in the table are included in the consolidated balance sheets, as follows:
(1)
Restricted investments are included in "Restricted investments, held to maturity, amortized cost."
(2)
Carrying value is net of $1.2 million and $1.3 million DLCs as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The Term Loan A is included in "Long-term debt, less current portion," as the Company has voluntarily prepaid all minimum quarterly principal payments through final maturity.
(3)
Carrying value is net of $0.5 million and $0.7 million DLCs as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, no major categories of assets or liabilities included in the Company's consolidated balance sheets at estimated fair value were measured on a recurring basis.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements The following table depicts the level in the fair value hierarchy of the inputs used to estimate fair value of assets measured on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
 
 
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Level 1 Inputs
 
Level 2 Inputs
 
Level 3 Inputs
 
Total Gains (Losses)
 
(In thousands)
As of June 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equipment (1)
$
625

 
$

 
$

 
$
625

 
$
(187
)
As of December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Software (2)
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(520
)
Equipment (3)
1,963

 

 

 
1,963

 
(250
)
____________
(1)
During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, management reassessed the fair value of certain IEL tractors, which had a total book value of $0.8 million, determining that there was a pre-tax impairment loss of $0.2 million. The impairment loss was recorded in "Impairments" within operating income in the consolidated income statement.
(2)
During the three months ended December 31, 2016, certain operations software related to the Company's logistics business was determined to be fully impaired based on a significant decrease in the expected useful life of the software. This resulted in a pre-tax impairment loss of $0.5 million, which was recorded in "Impairments" within operating income in the consolidated income statement.
(3)
During the three months ended December 31, 2016, management reassessed the fair value of certain IEL tractors, which had a total book value of $2.2 million, determining that there was a pre-tax impairment loss of $0.3 million. The impairment loss was recorded in "Impairments" within operating income in the consolidated income statement.
As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no liabilities on the Company's consolidated balance sheets estimated at fair value that were measured on a nonrecurring basis.

25



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



 
Note 15 — Jerry Moyes' Retirement
In conjunction with the Company's September 8, 2016 announcement that Jerry Moyes would retire from his position as Chief Executive Officer effective December 31, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Moyes to memorialize the terms of his retirement. The Company contracted with Mr. Moyes to serve as a non-employee consultant from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019, during which time the Company will pay Mr. Moyes a monthly consulting fee of $0.2 million in cash. Additionally, the Company modified the vesting terms and forfeiture conditions of Mr. Moyes' previously-granted equity awards. As a result of the terms of the agreement, the Company incurred a one-time expense in September 2016 of $7.1 million, consisting of $6.8 million in accrued consulting fees and $0.3 million for the impact of the equity award modifications. The amounts were included in "Salaries, wages, and employee benefits" within the non-reportable segments' income statement.
The following schedule is a rollforward of the accrued liability for the consulting fees:
 
June 30, 2017
 
(In thousands)
Accrued consulting fees – Jerry Moyes, December 31, 2016 (1)
$
6,675

Additions to accrual

Less: payments
(1,025
)
Accrued consulting fees – Jerry Moyes, June 30, 2017 (1)
$
5,650

____________
(1)
The balance is included in "Other liabilities" (noncurrent) and "Accrued liabilities" (current) in the consolidated balance sheet, based on the timing of the expected payments. The $0.3 million impact of the equity award modification is excluded from the accrual balance because it is classified as "Additional paid-in capital" in the consolidated balance sheet.
 
Note 16 — Information by Segment and Geography
Segment Information
The Company’s four reportable operating segments are Truckload, Dedicated, Refrigerated (formerly "Swift Refrigerated"), and Intermodal. See Note 1 regarding the reorganization of the Company's Dedicated and Refrigerated segments.
TruckloadThe Truckload segment consists of one-way movements over irregular routes throughout the United States, Mexico, and Canada. This service utilizes both company and owner-operator tractors with dry van, flatbed, and other specialized trailing equipment.
DedicatedThrough the Dedicated segment, the Company devotes use of equipment to specific customers and offers tailored solutions under long-term contracts. This segment utilizes dry van, flatbed, and other specialized trailing equipment.
RefrigeratedThis segment primarily consists of shipments for customers that require temperature-controlled trailers. These shipments include one-way movements over irregular routes, as well as dedicated truck operations.
IntermodalThe Intermodal segment includes revenue generated by moving freight over the rail in the Company's containers and other trailing equipment, combined with revenue for drayage to transport loads between the railheads and customer locations.
Non-reportable SegmentsThe non-reportable segments include the Company's logistics and freight brokerage services, as well as support services that its subsidiaries provide to customers and owner-operators, including repair and maintenance shop services, equipment leasing, and insurance. Intangible amortization related to the 2007 Transactions, certain legal settlements and reserves, and certain other corporate expenses are also included in the non-reportable segments.
Intersegment EliminationsCertain operating segments provide transportation and related services for other affiliates outside their reportable segment. Revenues for such services are based on negotiated rates, which we believe approximate fair value, and are reflected as revenues of the billing segment. These rates are adjusted from time to time, based on market conditions. Such intersegment revenues and expenses are eliminated in our consolidated results.

26



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) — CONTINUED



The following tables present the company's financial information by segment:
 
 
Quarter Ended June 30,
 
Year-to-Date June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016 (recast)
 
2017
 
2016 (recast)
Operating revenue:
 
(In thousands)
Truckload
 
$
492,241

 
$
517,593

 
$
973,787

 
$
1,010,115

Dedicated
 
157,727

 
146,119

 
308,563

 
289,030

Refrigerated
 
182,859

 
178,162

 
360,350

 
347,850

Intermodal
 
92,155

 
90,066

 
178,388

 
172,614

Subtotal
 
924,982

 
931,940

 
1,821,088

 
1,819,609

Non-reportable segments
 
83,818

 
99,315

 
166,532

 
198,563

Intersegment eliminations
 
(15,742
)
 
(19,401
)
 
(30,731
)
 
(38,495
)
Consolidated operating revenue
 
$
993,058

 
$
1,011,854

 
$
1,956,889

 
$
1,979,677

 
 
Quarter Ended June 30,
 
Year-to-Date June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016 (recast)
 
2017
 
2016 (recast)
Operating income (loss):
 
(In thousands)
Truckload
 
$
29,280

 
$
50,475

 
$
45,197

 
$
86,762

Dedicated
 
18,983

 
20,518

 
30,596

 
39,259

Refrigerated
 
8,290

 
12,735

 
1,955

 
17,520

Intermodal
 
1,499

 
903

 
1,390

 
(2,005
)
Subtotal
 
58,052

 
84,631

 
79,138

 
141,536

Non-reportable segments
 
(5,891
)
 
(10,426
)
 
(11,392
)
 
(14,848
)
Consolidated operating income
 
$
52,161

 
$
74,205

 
$
67,746

 
$
126,688

 
 
Quarter Ended June 30,
 
Year-to-Date June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016 (recast)
 
2017
 
2016 (recast)
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment:
 
(In thousands)
Truckload
 
$
28,098

 
$
30,570

 
$
60,032

 
$
61,853

Dedicated
 
12,427

 
11,773

 
25,509

 
23,790

Refrigerated
 
8,234

 
8,421

 
17,241

 
17,396

Intermodal
 
2,906

 
2,820

 
5,861

 
5,999

Subtotal
 
51,665

 
53,584

 
108,643

 
109,038

Non-reportable segments
 
10,688

 
11,104

 
21,479

 
22,601

Consolidated depreciation and amortization of property and equipment
 
$
62,353

 
$
64,688

 
$
130,122

 
$
131,639

Geographical Information
In aggregate, operating revenue from the Company's foreign operations was less than 5.0% of consolidated operating revenue for the quarter ended and year-to-date June 30, 2017 and 2016. Additionally, long-lived assets on the Company's foreign subsidiaries' balance sheets were less than 5.0% of consolidated total assets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

27




SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY




ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains statements that may constitute forward-looking statements, which are based on information currently available, usually defined by words such as "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "plans," "projects," "expects," "hopes," "intends," "will," "could," "should," "may," or similar expressions which speak only as of the date the statement was made. Such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning:
trends, management's beliefs, and expectations relating to our operations, Revenue xFSR, expenses, other revenue, pricing, our effective tax rate, profitability and related metrics, as well as share repurchases;
impact and planned timing of adopting recently issued accounting pronouncements on future periods;
the impact of changes in interest rates;
the outcome and impact of pending claims, litigation, and actions in respect thereof;
our intentions concerning the potential use of derivative financial instruments to hedge fuel price increases;
the timing and amount of future acquisitions of revenue equipment and other capital expenditures, as well as the use and availability of cash, cash flows from operations, leases, and debt to finance such acquisitions;
that we may seek additional borrowings, lease financing, or equity capital;
the potential impact of inflation, seasonality, and severe weather conditions on our results of operations;
our ability to finance our cash needs from operations for the next twelve months; and
the proposed merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company with and into Knight, including the expected timing of completion of the merger; the benefits of the merger; the combined company’s plans, objectives and expectations; future financial and operating results; and other statements regarding the merger that are not historical facts.
Such forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and are based upon the current beliefs, assumptions, and expectations of Company management and current market conditions, which are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, as set forth in the Risk Factors section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. As to the Company's business and financial performance, the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to materially differ from those in forward-looking statements:
economic conditions, including future recessionary economic cycles and downturns in customers’ business cycles, particularly in market segments and industries in which we have a significant concentration of customers;
increasing competition from trucking, rail, intermodal, and brokerage competitors;
our ability to execute or integrate any future acquisitions successfully;
increases in driver compensation to the extent not offset by increases in freight rates, and difficulties in driver recruitment and retention;
additional risks arising from our contractual agreements with owner-operators that do not exist with Company drivers;
our ability to retain or replace key personnel;
our dependence on third parties for intermodal and brokerage business;
potential failure in computer or communications systems;
seasonal factors such as severe weather conditions that increase operating costs;
the regulatory environment in which we operate, including existing regulations and changes in existing regulations, or violations by us of existing or future regulations;
the possible re-classification of owner-operators as employees;
changes in rules or legislation by the NLRB or Congress and/or union organizing efforts;
our CSA safety rating;
government regulation with respect to our captive insurance companies;


28




SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY




MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — CONTINUED
risks and uncertainties associated with our operations in Mexico, including changes in trade agreements and United States-Mexico relations;
a significant reduction in, or termination of, our trucking services by a key customer;
our significant ongoing capital requirements;
volatility in the price or availability of fuel, as well as our ability to recover fuel prices through our fuel surcharge program;
fluctuations in new equipment prices or replacement costs, and the potential failure of manufacturers to meet their sale and trade-back obligations;
the impact that our substantial leverage may have on the way we operate our business and our ability to service our debt, including compliance with our debt covenants;
restrictions contained in our debt agreements;
adverse impacts of insuring risk through our captive insurance companies, including our need to provide restricted cash and similar collateral for anticipated losses;
potential volatility or decrease in the amount of earnings as a result of our claims exposure through our captive insurance companies;
the potential impact of the significant number of shares of our common stock that are eligible for future sale;
goodwill impairment;
our intention to not pay dividends;
conflicts of interest or potential litigation that may arise from other businesses owned by Jerry Moyes, including pledges of Swift stock and guarantees by Jerry Moyes related to other businesses;
the significant amount of our stock and related control over the Company by Jerry Moyes; and
related-party transactions between the Company and Jerry Moyes.
Important factors, in addition to those listed above and in our filings with the SEC, could impact us financially. As a result of these and other factors, actual results may differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements, and the prices of the Company's securities may dramatically fluctuate. The Company makes no commitment, and disclaims any duty, to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect future events, new information or changes in these expectations, except as required by law.
Reference to Glossary of Terms
Certain acronyms and terms used throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are specific to our company, commonly used in our industry, or are otherwise frequently used throughout our document. Definitions for these acronyms and terms are provided in the "Glossary of Terms," available in the front of this document.
Reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

29



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — CONTINUED


Executive Summary
Company Overview — Swift is a multi-faceted transportation services company, operating one of the largest fleets of truckload equipment in North America from over 40 terminals near key freight centers and traffic lanes. We principally operate in short- to medium-haul traffic lanes around our terminals and dedicated customer locations. We concentrate on this length of haul because the majority of domestic truckload freight (as measured by revenue) moves in these lanes and our extensive terminal network affords us marketing, equipment control, supply chain, customer service, and driver retention advantages in local markets. Because our average length of haul is relatively short, it helps reduce competition from railroads and trucking companies that lack a regional presence.
Our four reportable segments are Truckload, Dedicated, Refrigerated (formerly "Swift Refrigerated"), and Intermodal. Our extensive suite of service offerings (which includes line-haul services, dedicated customer contracts, temperature-controlled units, intermodal freight solutions, cross-border United States/Mexico and United States/Canada freight, flatbed hauling, freight brokerage and logistics, and others) provides our customers with the opportunity to "one-stop-shop" for their truckload transportation needs.
Revenue — We primarily generate revenue by transporting freight for our customers, generally at a predetermined rate per mile. We supplement this revenue by charging for fuel surcharges, stop-off pay, loading and unloading activities, tractor and trailer detention, and other ancillary services. The main factors that affect our revenue from transporting freight are the rate per mile we receive from our customers and loaded miles. The main factors that affect fuel surcharge revenue are the price of diesel fuel and the number of loaded miles. Fuel surcharges are billed on a lagging basis, meaning that we typically bill customers in the current week based on a previous week's applicable index. Therefore, in times of increasing fuel prices, we do not recover as much as we are currently paying for fuel. In periods of declining prices, the opposite is true.
Revenue in our non-reportable segments is generated by our non-asset-based freight brokerage and logistics management service, tractor leasing revenue from our financing subsidiaries, premium revenue from our captive insurance companies, and revenue from third parties serviced by our repair and maintenance shops. Main factors affecting revenue in our non-reportable segments are demand for brokerage and logistics services, as well as the number of equipment leases by our financing subsidiaries to the owner-operators we contract with and other third parties.
Expenses — Our most significant expenses vary with miles traveled and include fuel, driver-related expenses (such as wages and benefits), and services purchased from owner-operators and other transportation providers (such as railroads, drayage providers, and other trucking companies). Maintenance and tire expenses, as well as the cost of insurance and claims generally vary with the miles we travel, but also have a controllable component based on safety improvements, fleet age, efficiency, and other factors. Our primary fixed costs are depreciation and lease expense for revenue equipment and terminals, interest expense, and non-driver compensation.
Compared to changes in rate per mile and loaded miles, changes in deadhead miles percentage generally have the largest proportionate effect on our profitability because we still bear all of the expenses for each deadhead mile, but do not earn any revenue to offset those expenses. Changes in rate per mile have the next largest proportionate effect on profitability because incremental improvements in rate per mile are not offset by any additional expenses. Changes in loaded miles generally have a smaller effect on profitability because variable expenses fluctuate with changes in miles. However, changes in mileage are affected by driver satisfaction and network efficiency, which indirectly affect expenses.
Recent Developments
Merger On April 10, 2017, Swift and Knight announced that their respective boards approved a merger of Knight and Swift in an all-stock transaction. The combined company will be named Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. ("Knight-Swift"). Further details regarding the merger are included in Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part I, Item 1: Financial Statements, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, incorporated by reference herein.
Segment Recast — Refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for information regarding the reorganization of the Dedicated and Refrigerated (formerly "Swift Refrigerated") segments.
Company Strategy — The truckload freight environment in 2016 and into 2017 remained challenging. Excess industry capacity, excess customer inventories, and depressed shipping demand pressured volumes and pricing. We implemented the following initiatives to help counter the effects of these external factors:
We downsized our core truckload fleet in an effort to improve asset utilization, and we continue to closely monitor and adjust our truckload fleet size to ensure proper utilization of our fleets.
We selectively increased our participation in the spot market to improve network balance and help offset the lack of available freight in certain markets. Our sales team remains heavily focused on increasing freight levels with both new and existing customer contracts, with the goal of eventually reducing our spot market activity.
We implemented several cost control initiatives throughout the organization, which include streamlining processes, reducing headcount, postponing non-critical system implementations, and reducing expenses in various other manners.

30



SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — CONTINUED


Financial Overview
 
Quarter Ended June 30,
 
Year-to-Date June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
GAAP financial data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating revenue
$
993,058

 
$