Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - SUPERVALU INC | c59629exv31w2.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - SUPERVALU INC | c59629exv32w2.htm |
EX-10.2 - EX-10.2 - SUPERVALU INC | c59629exv10w2.htm |
EX-10.3 - EX-10.3 - SUPERVALU INC | c59629exv10w3.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - SUPERVALU INC | c59629exv32w1.htm |
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - SUPERVALU INC | c59629exv10w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - SUPERVALU INC | c59629exv31w1.htm |
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - SUPERVALU INC | Financial_Report.xls |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period (12 weeks) ended September 11, 2010.
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ____ to ___.
Commission File Number: 1-5418
SUPERVALU INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 41-0617000 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
7075 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA |
55344 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(952) 828-4000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer ¨ | Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No x
As of October 15, 2010, there were 212,167,483 shares of the issuers common stock outstanding.
SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
Table of Contents
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SEGMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except percent data)
Second Quarter Ended | Year-to-Date Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 11, | September 12, | September 11, | September 12, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
||||||||||||||||
Retail food |
$ | 6,693 | $ | 7,411 | $ | 15,644 | $ | 17,311 | ||||||||
% of total |
77.3 | % | 78.3 | % | 77.4 | % | 78.1 | % | ||||||||
Supply chain services |
1,963 | 2,050 | 4,557 | 4,865 | ||||||||||||
% of total |
22.7 | % | 21.7 | % | 22.6 | % | 21.9 | % | ||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 8,656 | $ | 9,461 | $ | 20,201 | $ | 22,176 | ||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Operating earnings (loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Retail food (1) |
$ | (1,441 | ) | $ | 188 | $ | (1,190 | ) | $ | 499 | ||||||
% of sales |
(21.5 | )% | 2.5 | % | (7.6 | )% | 2.9 | % | ||||||||
Supply chain services |
69 | 63 | 148 | 145 | ||||||||||||
% of sales |
3.5 | % | 3.0 | % | 3.3 | % | 3.0 | % | ||||||||
Corporate |
(25 | ) | (6 | ) | (54 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating earnings (loss) |
(1,397 | ) | 245 | (1,096 | ) | 607 | ||||||||||
% of sales |
(16.1 | )% | 2.6 | % | (5.4 | )% | 2.7 | % | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
129 | 131 | 303 | 308 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
(1,526 | ) | 114 | (1,399 | ) | 299 | ||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
(56 | ) | 40 | 4 | 112 | |||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | (1,470 | ) | $ | 74 | $ | (1,403 | ) | $ | 187 | ||||||
(1) | Retail food operating loss for the second quarter and year-to-date ended September 11, 2010 reflects the preliminary estimate of goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges of $1,600. The impairment charges are subject to finalization of fair values which the Company will complete in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Refer to Note 2 Goodwill and Intangible Assets in the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
The Companys business is classified by management into two reportable segments: Retail food and
Supply chain services. These reportable segments are two distinct businesses, one retail and one
wholesale, each with a different customer base, marketing strategy and management structure. The
Retail food reportable segment is an aggregation of the Companys retail operating segments, which
are organized based on format (traditional retail food stores and hard-discount food stores). The
Retail food reportable segment derives revenues from the sale of groceries at retail locations
operated by the Company (both the Companys own stores and stores licensed by the Company). The
Supply chain services reportable segment derives revenues from wholesale distribution to
independently-owned retail food stores, mass merchants and other customers (collectively referred
to as independent retail customers) and logistics support services. Substantially all of the
Companys operations are domestic.
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Table of Contents
SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except percent and per share data)
Second Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||
September 11, | Net | September 12, | Net | |||||||||||||
2010 | sales | 2009 | sales | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 8,656 | 100.0 | % | $ | 9,461 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
6,724 | 77.7 | 7,372 | 77.9 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
1,932 | 22.3 | 2,089 | 22.1 | ||||||||||||
Selling and administrative expenses |
1,729 | 20.0 | 1,844 | 19.5 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges |
1,600 | 18.5 | | | ||||||||||||
Operating earnings (loss) |
(1,397 | ) | (16.1 | ) | 245 | 2.6 | ||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
129 | 1.5 | 131 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
(1,526 | ) | (17.6 | ) | 114 | 1.2 | ||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
(56 | ) | (0.7 | ) | 40 | 0.4 | ||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | (1,470 | ) | (17.0 | )% | $ | 74 | 0.8 | % | |||||||
Net earnings (loss) per sharebasic |
$ | (6.94 | ) | $ | 0.35 | |||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per sharediluted |
$ | (6.94 | ) | $ | 0.35 | |||||||||||
Dividends declared per share |
$ | 0.1750 | $ | 0.1750 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
212 | 212 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted |
212 | 213 |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except percent and per share data)
Year-to-Date Ended | ||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||
September 11, | Net | September 12, | Net | |||||||||||||
2010 | sales | 2009 | sales | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 20,201 | 100.0 | % | $ | 22,176 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
15,672 | 77.6 | 17,240 | 77.7 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
4,529 | 22.4 | 4,936 | 22.3 | ||||||||||||
Selling and administrative expenses |
4,025 | 19.9 | 4,329 | 19.5 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges |
1,600 | 7.9 | | | ||||||||||||
Operating earnings (loss) |
(1,096 | ) | (5.4 | ) | 607 | 2.7 | ||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
303 | 1.5 | 308 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
(1,399 | ) | (6.9 | ) | 299 | 1.3 | ||||||||||
Income tax provision |
4 | 0.0 | 112 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | (1,403 | ) | (6.9 | )% | $ | 187 | 0.8 | % | |||||||
Net earnings (loss) per sharebasic |
$ | (6.63 | ) | $ | 0.88 | |||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per sharediluted |
$ | (6.63 | ) | $ | 0.88 | |||||||||||
Dividends declared per share |
$ | 0.2625 | $ | 0.3475 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
212 | 212 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted |
212 | 213 |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except par value data)
September 11, | February 27, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 203 | $ | 211 | ||||
Receivables, net |
835 | 814 | ||||||
Inventories |
2,320 | 2,342 | ||||||
Other current assets |
202 | 344 | ||||||
Total current assets |
3,560 | 3,711 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
6,828 | 7,026 | ||||||
Goodwill |
2,250 | 3,698 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
1,314 | 1,493 | ||||||
Other assets |
585 | 508 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 14,537 | $ | 16,436 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 2,866 | $ | 2,775 | ||||
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
480 | 613 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
824 | 779 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
4,170 | 4,167 | ||||||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
6,644 | 7,022 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
2,272 | 2,360 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common stock, $1.00 par value: 400 shares authorized; 230 shares issued |
230 | 230 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
2,851 | 2,857 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(458 | ) | (478 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings (deficit) |
(652 | ) | 806 | |||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 18 and 18 shares, respectively |
(520 | ) | (528 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,451 | 2,887 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 14,537 | $ | 16,436 | ||||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
Year-to-Date Ended | ||||||||
September 11, | September 12, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | (1,403 | ) | $ | 187 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges |
1,600 | | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
502 | 515 | ||||||
LIFO charge |
12 | 21 | ||||||
Asset impairment and other charges |
23 | 20 | ||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
(6 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes |
(35 | ) | 120 | |||||
Stock-based compensation |
9 | 20 | ||||||
Other |
18 | 14 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
34 | (36 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
754 | 840 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
86 | 22 | ||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(312 | ) | (396 | ) | ||||
Other |
15 | 5 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(211 | ) | (369 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
66 | 943 | ||||||
Payment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
(573 | ) | (1,306 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(37 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||
Other |
(7 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(551 | ) | (442 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(8 | ) | 29 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
211 | 240 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period |
$ | 203 | $ | 269 | ||||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
SUPERVALU INC. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars and shares in millions, except per share data)
NOTE 1
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Statement of Registrant
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company for the second quarter
and year-to-date ended September 11, 2010 and September 12, 2009 are unaudited and, in the opinion
of management, contain all adjustments that are of a normal and recurring nature necessary to
present fairly the financial condition and results of operations for such periods. The condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 27, 2010. The results of operations for the second quarter and year-to-date ended
September 11, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year. The
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 27, 2010 has been derived from the audited
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of that date.
Accounting Policies
The summary of significant accounting policies is included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements set forth in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February
27, 2010.
Fiscal Year
The Companys fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in February. The Companys first quarter
consists of 16 weeks, while the second, third and fourth quarters each consist of 12 weeks.
Because of differences in the accounting calendars of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary,
New Albertsons, Inc., the accompanying September 11, 2010 and February 27, 2010 Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets include the assets and liabilities related to New Albertsons, Inc. as
of September 9, 2010 and February 25, 2010, respectively.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the
time of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Companys banking arrangements allow the Company to
fund outstanding checks when presented to the financial institution for payment, resulting in book
overdrafts. Book overdrafts are recorded in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reflected as an operating activity in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As of September 11, 2010 and February 27, 2010, the Company
had net book overdrafts of $327 and $330, respectively.
7
Table of Contents
Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic net earnings (loss) per share is calculated using net earnings (loss) available to common
stockholders divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share is similar to basic net earnings (loss) per share except that
the weighted average number of shares outstanding is after giving effect to the dilutive impacts of
stock options, restricted stock awards and other dilutive securities. In addition, for the
calculation of diluted net earnings (loss) per share, net earnings (loss) is adjusted to eliminate
the after-tax interest expense recognized during the period related to contingently convertible
debentures. As a result of the net loss for the second quarter and year-to-date ended September
11, 2010, all potentially dilutive shares were antidilutive and therefore excluded from the
calculation of diluted net loss per share.
The following table reflects the calculation of basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share:
Second Quarter Ended | Year-to-Date Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 11, | September 12, | September 11, | September 12, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per sharebasic |
||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | (1,470 | ) | $ | 74 | $ | (1,403 | ) | $ | 187 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
212 | 212 | 212 | 212 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per sharebasic |
$ | (6.94 | ) | $ | 0.35 | $ | (6.63 | ) | $ | 0.88 | ||||||
Net earnings (loss) per sharediluted |
||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | (1,470 | ) | $ | 74 | $ | (1,403 | ) | $ | 187 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
212 | 212 | 212 | 212 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive impact of options and restricted stock
outstanding |
| 1 | | 1 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted |
212 | 213 | 212 | 213 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per sharediluted |
$ | (6.94 | ) | $ | 0.35 | $ | (6.63 | ) | $ | 0.88 |
Options
and restricted stock of 24 and 23 shares were outstanding during the second quarter and
year-to-date ended September 11, 2010, respectively, but were excluded from the calculation of
diluted net loss per share as the effect of their inclusion would be antidilutive when applied to a
net loss. Options and restricted stock of 23 and 22 shares were outstanding during the second
quarter and year-to-date ended September 12, 2009, respectively, but were excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:
Second Quarter Ended | Year-to-Date Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 11, | September 12, | September 11, | September 12, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ | (1,470 | ) | $ | 74 | $ | (1,403 | ) | $ | 187 | ||||||
Pension and other postretirement activity, net of tax |
9 | 2 | 20 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (1,461 | ) | $ | 76 | $ | (1,383 | ) | $ | 194 | ||||||
8
Table of Contents
NOTE 2
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Changes in the Companys Goodwill and Intangible assets consisted of the following:
February 27, | Other net | September 11, | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 | Additions | Impairments | adjustments | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Retail food goodwill |
$ | 6,114 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2 | $ | 6,116 | ||||||||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
(3,223 | ) | | (1,450 | ) | | (4,673 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Retail food goodwill, net |
2,891 | | (1,450 | ) | 2 | 1,443 | ||||||||||||||
Supply chain services goodwill |
807 | | | | 807 | |||||||||||||||
Total goodwill |
$ | 3,698 | $ | | $ | (1,450 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | 2,250 | |||||||||
February 27, | Additions/ | Other net | September 11, | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | Amortization | Impairments | adjustments | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks
and tradenames indefinite useful lives |
$ | 1,049 | $ | | $ | (150 | ) | $ | | $ | 899 | |||||||||
Favorable operating leases, customer lists,
customer relationships and other (accumulated
amortization of $265 and $238 as of September 11,
2010 and February 27, 2010, respectively) |
674 | 2 | | (4 | ) | 672 | ||||||||||||||
Non-compete agreements (accumulated amortization of
$4 and $5 as of September 11, 2010 and February 27,
2010, respectively) |
13 | | | (1 | ) | 12 | ||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets |
1,736 | 2 | (150 | ) | (5 | ) | 1,583 | |||||||||||||
Accumulated amortization |
(243 | ) | (31 | ) | | 5 | (269 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total intangible assets, net |
$ | 1,493 | $ | 1,314 | ||||||||||||||||
The Company applies a fair value based impairment test to the net book value of goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite useful lives on an annual basis and on an interim basis if
certain events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have occurred. For the second
quarter of fiscal 2011 the Companys stock price had a significant and sustained decline and book
value per share substantially exceeded the stock price. As a result, the Company performed an
interim impairment test of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives at the end
of the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Although this analysis has not been completed due to its
complexity, based on the work performed to date the Company has recorded a preliminary estimate of
impairment charges of $1,600, comprised of $1,450 of goodwill and $150 of intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives. The impairment charges are subject to finalization of fair values which
the Company will complete in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company believes that the
preliminary estimates of impairment charges are reasonable and represent the Companys best
estimate of the impairment charges to be incurred; however, it is possible that material
adjustments to the preliminary estimates may be required as the analysis is finalized.
Amortization expense of intangible assets with definite useful lives was $31 and $32 for the
year-to-date ended September 11, 2010 and September 12, 2009, respectively. Future amortization
expense will be approximately $41 per fiscal year for each of the next five fiscal years.
NOTE 3
RESERVES FOR CLOSED PROPERTIES
The Company maintains reserves for costs associated with closures of retail stores, distribution
centers and other properties that are no longer being utilized in current operations. The Company
provides for closed property operating lease liabilities using a discount rate to calculate the
present value of the remaining noncancellable lease payments after the closing date, reduced by
estimated subtenant rentals that could be reasonably obtained for the property. Adjustments to
closed property reserves primarily relate to changes in subtenant income or actual exit costs
differing from original estimates. Adjustments are made for changes in estimates in the period in
which the changes become known.
Changes in the Companys reserves for closed properties consisted of the following:
September 11, | ||||
2010 | ||||
Reserves for closed properties at beginning of fiscal year |
$ | 128 | ||
Additions |
22 | |||
Payments |
(21 | ) | ||
Adjustments |
(3 | ) | ||
Reserves for closed properties at end of period |
$ | 126 | ||
9
Table of Contents
NOTE 4
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets
and liabilities recorded at fair value are categorized using defined hierarchical levels directly
related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair value measurements, as
follows:
Level 1 - | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; | ||
Level 2 - | Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; | ||
Level 3 - | Unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists, requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions that market participants would use to value the asset or liability. |
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges recorded during the second quarter ended September
11, 2010 and discussed in Note 2 Goodwill and Intangible Assets were measured at fair value
using Level 3 Inputs.
During the second quarter and year-to-date ended September 11, 2010, the Company recorded $3 and
$13, respectively, of property, plant and equipment-related impairment charges, which were measured
at fair value using Level 3 inputs. Property, plant and equipment-related impairment charges are a
component of Selling and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Earnings.
Financial Instruments
For certain of the Companys financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents,
receivables and accounts payable, the fair values approximate book values due to their short
maturities.
The estimated fair value of notes receivable was greater than the book value by approximately $1 as
of September 11, 2010 and was less than the book value by approximately $1 as of February 27, 2010.
Notes receivable are valued based on a discounted cash flow approach applying a rate that is
comparable to publicly traded instruments of similar credit quality.
The estimated fair value of the Companys long-term debt (including current maturities) was less
than the book value by approximately $183 and $54 as of September 11, 2010 and February 27, 2010,
respectively. The estimated fair value was based on market quotes, where available, or market
values for similar instruments.
10
Table of Contents
NOTE 5
LONG-TERM DEBT
The Companys long-term debt and capital lease obligations consisted of the following:
September 11, | February 27, | |||||||
2010 | 2010 | |||||||
1.14% to 4.50% Revolving Credit Facility and Variable Rate Notes due
June 2011 October 2015 |
$ | 1,394 | $ | 1,415 | ||||
8.00% Notes due May 2016 |
1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||
7.45% Debentures due August 2029 |
650 | 650 | ||||||
7.50% Notes due November 2014 |
490 | 490 | ||||||
6.34% to
7.15% Medium Term Notes due July 2012 June 2028 |
440 | 440 | ||||||
8.00% Debentures due May 2031 |
400 | 400 | ||||||
7.50% Notes due February 2011 |
392 | 679 | ||||||
7.50% Notes due May 2012 |
300 | 300 | ||||||
8.00% Debentures due June 2026 |
272 | 272 | ||||||
8.70% Debentures due May 2030 |
225 | 225 | ||||||
7.75% Debentures due June 2026 |
200 | 200 | ||||||
7.25% Notes due May 2013 |
200 | 200 | ||||||
7.90% Debentures due May 2017 |
96 | 96 | ||||||
Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility |
25 | | ||||||
8.35% Notes due May 2010 |
| 155 | ||||||
Other |
104 | 104 | ||||||
Net discount on debt, using an effective interest rate of 6.28% to 8.97% |
(254 | ) | (258 | ) | ||||
Capital lease obligations |
1,190 | 1,267 | ||||||
Total debt and capital lease obligations |
7,124 | 7,635 | ||||||
Less current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
(480 | ) | (613 | ) | ||||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
$ | 6,644 | $ | 7,022 | ||||
Certain of the Companys credit facilities and long-term debt agreements have restrictive covenants
and cross-default provisions which generally provide, subject to the Companys right to cure, for
the acceleration of payments due in the event of a breach of the covenant or a default in the
payment of a specified amount of indebtedness due under certain other debt agreements. The Company
was in compliance with all such covenants and provisions for all periods presented.
During fiscal 2007, the Company entered into senior secured credit facilities provided by a group
of lenders consisting of a five-year revolving credit facility (the Revolving Credit Facility), a
five-year term loan (Term Loan A) and a six-year term loan (Term Loan B). On April 5, 2010,
the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement), which
provides for an extension of the maturity of portions of the senior secured credit facilities
provided under the original credit agreement. Specifically, $1,500 of the Revolving Credit Facility
was extended until April 5, 2015 and $500 of Term Loan B was extended until October 5, 2015. The
remaining $600 of the Revolving Credit Facility will expire on June 2, 2011 and the remaining $502
of Term Loan B will mature on June 2, 2012. The maturity date of Term Loan A was not extended and
will mature on June 2, 2011.
As of September 11, 2010, there was $57 of outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit
Facility at rates ranging from LIBOR plus 1.00 percent to Prime plus 1.25 percent, Term Loan A had
a remaining principal balance of $337 at LIBOR plus 0.875 percent, all of which was classified as
current, the non-extended portion of Term Loan B had a remaining principal balance of $501 at LIBOR
plus 1.25 percent, of which $5 was classified as current, and the extended portion of Term Loan B
had a remaining principal balance of $499 at LIBOR plus 2.75 percent, of which $5 was classified as
current. Letters of credit outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility were $315 and the
unused available credit under the Revolving Credit Facility was $1,728. These letters of credit
primarily support workers compensation and payment obligations.
The Credit Agreement reset covenants which are generally less restrictive than the covenants that
existed prior to April 5, 2010. Specifically, the Company must maintain a leverage ratio no
greater than 4.25 to 1.0 through December 30, 2011, 4.0 to 1.0 from December 31, 2011 through
December 30, 2012 and 3.75 to 1.0 thereafter. Additionally, the Company must maintain an interest
expense coverage ratio of not less than 2.20 to 1.0 through December 30, 2011, 2.25 to 1.0 from
December 31, 2011 through December 30, 2012 and 2.30 to 1.0 thereafter.
In May 2010, the Company amended and extended its accounts receivable securitization program until
May 2013. The Company can borrow up to $200 on a revolving basis, with borrowings secured by
eligible accounts receivable, which remain under the Companys control. The facility fee in effect
on September 11, 2010, based on the Companys current credit ratings, was 0.80 percent. As of
September 11, 2010, there were $288 of accounts receivable pledged as collateral, classified in
Receivables in the Condensed
11
Table of Contents
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
As of September 11, 2010, the Company had $403 of debt with current maturities that are classified
in Long-term debt in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the Companys intent to
refinance such obligations with the Revolving Credit Facility or other long-term debt.
NOTE 6 INCOME TAXES
During the year-to-date ended September 11, 2010 there were no material changes to the unrecognized
tax benefits disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 27, 2010. The Company does not anticipate that its total unrecognized tax benefits will
change significantly in the next 12 months.
NOTE 7 STOCK-BASED AWARDS
The Company recognized pre-tax stock-based compensation expense (included primarily in Selling and
administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings) related to
stock-based awards of $4 and $9 for the second quarter and year-to-date ended September 11, 2010,
respectively, compared to $6 and $20 for the second quarter and year-to-date ended September 12,
2009, respectively.
During the year-to-date ended September 11, 2010 and September 12, 2009, the Company granted 3
shares under stock options. To calculate the fair value of stock options, the Company uses the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The significant weighted average assumptions relating to the
valuation of the Companys stock options consisted of the following:
September 11, | September 12, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Dividend yield |
2.0 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||
Volatility rate |
42.8 45.1 | % | 38.4 42.2 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.1 1.6 | % | 1.9 2.8 | % | ||||
Expected option life |
4.0 5.4 years | 4.0 5.4 years |
The weighted average grant date fair value of the stock options granted during the year-to-date
ended September 11, 2010 and September 12, 2009 was $4.01 and $4.93, respectively.
NOTE 8 TREASURY STOCK PURCHASE PROGRAM
On June 24, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted and announced a new annual share
purchase program authorizing the Company to purchase up to $70 of the Companys common stock.
Stock purchases will be made primarily from the cash generated from the settlement of stock
options. This annual authorization program replaced the previously existing share purchase program
and continues through June 2011. The Company did not purchase any shares during the second quarter
or year-to-date ended September 11, 2010 under the new annual share purchase program. During the
year-to-date ended September 11, 2010, the Company purchased 0.2 shares under the previously
existing share purchase program at an average cost of $12.97 per share. The Company did not
purchase any shares under any share purchase programs during the second quarter or year-to-date
ended September 12, 2009.
12
Table of Contents
NOTE 9
BENEFIT PLANS
Substantially all employees of the Company are covered by various contributory and non-contributory
pension, profit sharing or 401(k) plans. Union employees participate in multi-employer retirement
plans under collective bargaining agreements, unless the collective bargaining agreement provides
for participation in plans sponsored by the Company. In addition to sponsoring both defined benefit
and defined contribution pension plans, the Company provides healthcare and life insurance benefits
for eligible retired employees under postretirement benefit plans and short-term and long-term
disability benefits to former and inactive employees prior to retirement under post-employment
benefit plans. The terms of the postretirement benefit plans vary based on employment history, age
and date of retirement. For most retirees, the Company provides a fixed dollar contribution and
retirees pay contributions to fund the remaining cost.
Net periodic benefit expense for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit
plans consisted of the following:
Second Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||
September 11, | September 12, | September 11, | September 12, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 2 | $ | 1 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Interest cost |
32 | 32 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on assets |
(28 | ) | (29 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service benefit |
| | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
14 | 2 | | | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit expense |
$ | 20 | $ | 6 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
Year-to-Date Ended | ||||||||||||||||
Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||
September 11, | September 12, | September 11, | September 12, | |||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 4 | $ | 3 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
74 | 74 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on assets |
(66 | ) | (68 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service benefit |
| | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
35 | 5 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit expense |
$ | 47 | $ | 14 | $ | 3 | $ | 3 | ||||||||
During the year-to-date ended September 11, 2010, the Company made contributions of $87 to its
pension plans and $3 to its other postretirement benefit plans.
Multi-Employer Plans
The Company contributes to various multi-employer pension plans under collective bargaining
agreements, primarily defined benefit pension plans. These plans generally provide retirement
benefits to participants based on their service to contributing employers. Based on available
information, the Company believes that some of the multi-employer plans to which it contributes are
underfunded. Company contributions to these plans could increase in the near term. However, the
amount of any increase or decrease in contributions will depend on a variety of factors, including
the results of the Companys collective bargaining efforts, investment returns on the assets held
in the plans, actions taken by the trustees who manage the plans and requirements under the Pension
Protection Act and Section 412(e) of the Internal Revenue Code. Furthermore, if the Company was to
significantly reduce contributions, exit certain markets or otherwise cease making contributions to
these plans, it could trigger a partial or complete withdrawal that would require the Company to
fund its proportionate share of a plans unfunded vested benefits. During the year-to-date ended
September 11, 2010 and September 12, 2009, the Company contributed $73 and $78 to these plans,
respectively.
The Company also makes contributions to multi-employer health and welfare plans in amounts set
forth in the related collective bargaining agreements. A small minority of collective bargaining
agreements contain reserve requirements that may trigger unanticipated contributions resulting in
increased healthcare expenses. If these healthcare provisions cannot be renegotiated in a manner
that reduces the prospective healthcare cost as the Company intends, the Companys Selling and
administrative expenses could increase in the future.
13
Table of Contents
NOTE
10 COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Guarantees
The Company has guaranteed certain leases, fixture financing loans and other debt obligations of
various retailers as of September 11, 2010. These guarantees were generally made to support the
business growth of independent retail customers. The guarantees are generally for the entire terms
of the leases or other debt obligations with remaining terms that range from less than one year to
20 years, with a weighted average remaining term of approximately nine years. For each guarantee
issued, if the independent retail customer defaults on a payment, the Company would be required to
make payments under its guarantee. Generally, the guarantees are secured by indemnification
agreements or personal guarantees of the independent retail customer. The Company reviews
performance risk related to its guarantees of independent retail customers based on internal
measures of credit performance. As of September 11, 2010, the maximum amount of undiscounted
payments the Company would be required to make in the event of default of all of these guarantees
was $126 and represented $94 on a discounted basis. Based on the indemnification agreements,
personal guarantees and results of the reviews of performance risk, the Company believes the
likelihood that it will be required to assume a material amount of these obligations is remote.
Accordingly, no amount has been recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for these
contingent obligations under the Companys guarantee arrangements.
The Company is contingently liable for leases that have been assigned to various third parties in
connection with facility closings and dispositions. The Company could be required to satisfy the
obligations under the leases if any of the assignees are unable to fulfill their lease obligations.
Due to the wide distribution of the Companys assignments among third parties, and various other
remedies available, the Company believes the likelihood that it will be required to assume a
material amount of these obligations is remote.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into supply contracts to purchase products
for resale. These contracts typically include volume commitments or fixed expiration dates,
termination provisions and other standard contractual considerations. As of September 11, 2010,
the Company had $1,281 of non-cancelable future purchase obligations primarily related to supply
contracts.
The Company is a party to a variety of contractual agreements under which the Company may be
obligated to indemnify the other party for certain matters, which indemnities may be secured by
operation of law or otherwise, in the ordinary course of business. These contracts primarily relate
to the Companys commercial contracts, operating leases and other real estate contracts, financial
agreements, agreements to provide services to the Company and agreements to indemnify officers,
directors and employees in the performance of their work. While the Companys aggregate
indemnification obligation could result in a material liability, the Company is not aware of any
matters that are expected to result in a material liability.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to various lawsuits, claims and other legal matters that arise in the
ordinary course of conducting business, none of which, in managements opinion, is expected to have
a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
In September 2008, a class action complaint was filed against the Company, as well as International
Outsourcing Services, LLC (IOS), Inmar, Inc., Carolina Manufacturers Services, Inc., Carolina
Coupon Clearing, Inc. and Carolina Services, in the United States District Court in the Eastern
District of Wisconsin. The plaintiffs in the case are a consumer goods manufacturer, a grocery
co-operative and a retailer marketing services company who allege on behalf of a purported class
that the Company and the other defendants (i) conspired to restrict the markets for coupon
processing services under the Sherman Act and (ii) were part of an illegal enterprise to defraud
the plaintiffs under the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. The
plaintiffs seek monetary damages, attorneys fees and injunctive relief. The Company intends to
vigorously defend this lawsuit, however all proceedings have been stayed in the case pending the
result of the criminal prosecution of certain former officers of IOS. Although this lawsuit is
subject to the uncertainties inherent in the litigation process, based on the information presently
available to the Company, management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of this lawsuit
will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
In December 2008, a class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the
Western District of Wisconsin against the Company alleging that a 2003 transaction between the
Company and C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. (C&S) was a conspiracy to restrain trade and allocate
markets. In the 2003 transaction, the Company purchased certain assets of the Fleming Corporation
as part of Fleming Corporations bankruptcy proceedings and sold certain assets of the Company to
C&S which were located in New England. Since December 2008, three other retailers have filed
similar complaints in other jurisdictions. The cases have been consolidated and are proceeding in
the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. The complaints allege that the
conspiracy was concealed and continued through the use of non-compete and non-solicitation
agreements and the closing down of the distribution facilities that the Company and C&S purchased
from the other. Plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages, injunctive relief and attorneys fees.
The Company is vigorously defending these lawsuits. On September 14, 2009, the United States
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a subpoena to the Company requesting documents related to
the C&S transaction as part of the FTCs investigation into whether the Company and C&S engaged in
unfair methods of competition. The Company is cooperating with the FTC. Although this matter is
subject to the uncertainties inherent in the litigation process, based on the information presently
14
Table of Contents
available to the Company, management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of this lawsuit
or the FTC investigation will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
On January 7, 2010, the Company received a subpoena from the Office of Inspector General for the
Department of Health and Human Services Milwaukee Field Office in connection with an investigation
of possible false or otherwise improper claims for payment under the Medicaid program. The subpoena
requests retail pharmacy claims data for dual eligible customers (i.e., customers with both
Medicaid and private insurance coverage), information concerning the Companys retail pharmacy
claims processing systems, copies of pharmacy payor contracts and other documents and records. The
Company is cooperating with the Office of Inspector General. Management cannot predict with
certainty the timing or outcome of any review by the government of such information.
On September 13, 2010, the Company entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the United
States Attorneys Office for the District of Maryland whereby the government agreed not to
prosecute the Company with regard to a consulting relationship with Maryland State Senator Ulysses
Currie, subject to certain terms and conditions. In exchange for the deferral of prosecution, the
Company agreed, among other things, to continue its cooperation with the government and pay a $3 fine.
The Company is also involved in routine legal proceedings incidental to its operations. Some of
these routine proceedings involve class allegations, many of which are ultimately dismissed.
Management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of these legal proceedings will have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The statements above reflect managements current expectations based on the information presently
available to the Company, however, predicting the outcomes of claims and litigation and estimating
related costs and exposures involves substantial uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes,
costs and exposures to vary materially from current expectations. In addition, the Company
regularly monitors its exposure to the loss contingencies associated with these matters and may
from time to time change its predictions with respect to outcomes and its estimates with respect to
related costs and exposures and believes recorded reserves are adequate. It is possible, although
management believes it is remote, that material differences in actual outcomes, costs and exposures
relative to current predictions and estimates, or material changes in such predictions or
estimates, could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
NOTE
11 SEGMENT INFORMATION
Refer to page 2 for the Companys segment information.
15
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars and shares in millions, except per share data)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, Net sales were $8,656 and Net loss was $1,470, or $6.94 per
basic and diluted share. Results for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 include charges of $1,620
before tax ($1,529 after tax, or $7.22 per diluted share) comprised of the preliminary estimate of
non-cash goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges of $1,600 before tax ($1,516 after tax,
or $7.16 per diluted share), and certain other costs of $20 before tax ($13 after tax, or $0.06 per
diluted share) primarily related to the impact of a labor dispute and employee-related costs. In
the second quarter of fiscal 2010, Net sales were $9,461 and Net earnings were $74, or $0.35 per
basic and diluted share.
Weakness in the economy continued to negatively impact consumer confidence during the second
quarter of fiscal 2011 and, as a result, consumers continue to spend less. In addition, low levels
of inflation and continued value-focused competitive activity in fiscal 2011 pressured sales
growth. If these consumer spending, inflationary and competitive trends continue, they could
further impact the Companys sales and financial results for the remainder of fiscal 2011.
SECOND QUARTER RESULTS
Net Sales
Net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $8,656 compared with $9,461 last year,
reflecting decreased sales in both the Retail food and Supply chain services segments. Retail food
sales were 77.3 percent of Net sales and Supply chain services sales were 22.7 percent of Net sales
for the second quarter of fiscal 2011, compared with 78.3 percent and 21.7 percent, respectively,
last year.
Retail food net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $6,693 compared with $7,411 last
year, a decrease of 9.7 percent. The decrease primarily reflects the change in retail sales of
identical stores (defined as stores operating for four full quarters, including store expansions
and excluding fuel and planned store closures) of negative 6.4 percent and the impact of market
exits. The identical store retail sales performance was primarily the result of the challenging
economic environment, heightened competitive activity and the impact of a labor dispute settled
early in the quarter. Excluding the stores impacted by the labor dispute, the change in retail
sales of the remaining identical stores was negative 5.9 percent.
Total retail square footage at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2011 was 65 million, a
decrease of 3.1 percent from the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Total retail square footage,
excluding previously announced retail market exits and other store closures, increased 0.9 percent
over the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
Supply chain services net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $1,963 compared with
$2,050 last year. The decrease of 4.2 percent primarily reflects a national retail customers
previously announced plans to transition certain volume to self-distribution and the loss of a customer due to acquisition by a competitor.
Gross Profit
Gross profit, as a percent of Net sales, was 22.3 percent in the second quarter of fiscal 2011
compared to 22.1 percent last year. The increase is primarily attributable to more effective
promotional spending partially offset by investments in price.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses, as a percent of Net sales, were 20.0 percent in the second
quarter of fiscal 2011, compared with 19.5 percent last year. The increase primarily reflects
reduced sales leverage and variance in surplus property expense that more than offset the savings
achieved from ongoing cost reduction initiatives.
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment Charges
The Company applies a fair value based impairment test to the net book value of goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite useful lives on an annual basis and on an interim basis if certain events or circumstances indicate that
an impairment loss may have occurred. For the second quarter of fiscal 2011 the Companys stock
price had a significant and sustained decline and book value per share substantially exceeded the
stock price. As a result, the Company performed an interim impairment test of goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite useful lives at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
Although this analysis has not been completed due to its complexity, based on the work performed to
date the Company has recorded a preliminary estimate of impairment charges of $1,600, comprised of
$1,450 of goodwill and $150 of intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. The impairment
charges are
16
Table of Contents
subject to finalization of fair values which the Company will complete in the third
quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company believes that the preliminary estimates of impairment charges
are reasonable and represent the Companys best estimate of the impairment charges to be incurred;
however, it is possible that material adjustments to the preliminary estimates may be required as
the analysis is finalized.
Operating Earnings (Loss)
Operating loss for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 was $1,397 compared with operating earnings of
$245 last year. Retail food operating loss for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 was $1,441, or
negative 21.5 percent of Retail food net sales, compared with
operating earnings of $188, or 2.5 percent of Retail food net sales last year. The decrease
reflects $1,600, or 23.9 percent of Retail food sales, of goodwill and intangible asset impairment
charges and $17, or 0.2 percent of Retail food sales, of certain other costs primarily related to
the impact of a labor dispute and employee-related costs. The remaining decrease of $12, or
positive 10 basis points, is primarily attributable to lower sales, market exits and reduced sales
leverage, partially offset by improved gross margins and cost savings. Supply chain services
operating earnings for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $69, or 3.5 percent of Supply chain
services net sales, compared with $63, or 3.0 percent of Supply chain services net sales last year.
The increase in Supply chain services operating earnings as a percent of Supply chain services net
sales is primarily attributable to improved productivity.
Net Interest Expense
Net interest expense was $129 in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 compared with $131 last year.
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
The income tax benefit for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 was $56, or 3.7 percent of loss before
income taxes, compared with income tax expense of $40, or 35.1 percent of earnings before income
taxes, last year. The tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 reflects the impact of the
goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges, the majority of which are non-deductible for
income tax purposes.
Net Earnings (Loss)
Net loss was $1,470, or $6.94 per basic and diluted share, in the second quarter of fiscal 2011
compared with net earnings of $74, or $0.35 per basic and diluted share, last year. Net loss for
the second quarter of fiscal 2011 includes the preliminary estimate of goodwill and intangible
asset impairment charges and certain other costs primarily related to the impact of a labor dispute
and employee-related costs of $1,620 before tax ($1,529 after tax, or $7.22 per diluted share).
YEAR-TO-DATE RESULTS
Net Sales
Net sales for fiscal 2011 year-to-date were $20,201 compared with $22,176 last year, reflecting
decreased sales in both the Retail food and Supply chain services segments. Retail food sales were
77.4 percent of Net sales and Supply chain services sales were 22.6 percent of Net sales for fiscal
2011 year-to-date, compared with 78.1 percent and 21.9 percent, respectively, last year.
Retail food net sales for fiscal 2011 year-to-date were $15,644 compared with $17,311 last year, a
decrease of 9.6 percent. The decrease primarily reflects the change in retail sales of identical
stores (defined as stores operating for four full quarters, including store expansions and
excluding fuel and planned store closures) of negative 6.9 percent and the impact of market exits.
The year-to-date identical store retail sales performance was primarily the result of the
challenging economic environment, heightened competitive activity and the impact of a labor dispute
settled early in the second quarter. Excluding the stores impacted by the labor dispute, the change in retail sales of the remaining identical stores was negative 6.2 percent.
Supply chain services net sales for fiscal 2011 year-to-date were $4,557 compared with $4,865 last
year, a decrease of 6.3 percent, primarily reflecting the completion of a national retail
customers previously announced plans to transition certain volume to self-distribution and the
loss of a customer due to acquisition by a competitor.
Gross Profit
Gross profit, as a percent of Net sales, was 22.4 percent for fiscal 2011 year-to-date compared to
22.3 percent last year.
17
Table of Contents
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses, as a percent of Net sales, were 19.9 percent for fiscal 2011
year-to-date compared to 19.5 percent last year. The increase primarily reflects reduced sales
leverage and variance in surplus property expense that more than offset the savings achieved from
ongoing cost reduction initiatives.
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment Charges
The Company applies a fair value based impairment test to the net book value of goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite useful lives on an annual basis and on an interim basis if
certain events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have occurred. For the second
quarter of fiscal 2011 the Companys stock price had a significant and sustained decline and book
value per share substantially exceeded the stock price. As a result, the Company performed an
interim impairment test of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives at the end
of the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Although this analysis has not been completed due to its
complexity, based on the work performed to date the Company has recorded a preliminary estimate of
impairment charges of $1,600, comprised of $1,450 of goodwill and $150 of intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives. The impairment charges are subject to finalization of fair values which
the Company will complete in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company believes that the
preliminary estimates of impairment charges are reasonable and represent the Companys best
estimate of the impairment charges to be incurred; however, it is possible that material
adjustments to the preliminary estimates may be required as the analysis is finalized.
Operating Earnings (Loss)
Operating loss for fiscal 2011 year-to-date was $1,096 compared with operating earnings of $607
last year. Retail food operating loss for fiscal 2011 year-to-date was $1,190, or negative 7.6
percent of Retail food net sales compared with operating earnings of $499 or 2.9 percent of Retail
food net sales last year. The decrease reflects $1,600, or 10.2 percent of Retail food sales, of
goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges and $38, or 0.2 percent of Retail food sales, of
certain other costs primarily related to the impact of a labor dispute. The remaining decrease of
$51, or negative 10 basis points, is primarily attributable to lower sales, market exits and
reduced sales leverage, partially offset by improved gross margins and cost savings. Supply chain
services operating earnings for fiscal 2011 year-to-date were $148, or 3.3 percent of Supply chain
services net sales, compared with $145, or 3.0 percent of Supply chain services net sales last
year. The increase in Supply chain services operating earnings as a percent of Supply chain
services net sales is primarily attributable to improved
productivity.
Net Interest Expense
Net interest expense was $303 for fiscal 2011 year-to-date compared with $308 last year.
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
Income tax expense was $4, or 0.3 percent of loss before income taxes, for fiscal 2011 year-to-date
compared with income tax expense of $112, or 37.3 percent of earnings before income taxes, last
year. The tax rate for fiscal 2011 year-to-date reflects the impact of the goodwill and intangible
asset impairment charges, the majority of which are non-deductible for income tax purposes.
Net Earnings (Loss)
Net loss was $1,403, or $6.63 per basic and diluted share, for fiscal 2011 year-to-date compared
with Net earnings of $187, or $0.88 per basic and diluted share, last year. Net loss for fiscal
2011 year-to-date includes the preliminary estimate of goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges and certain other costs primarily related to the impact of a
labor dispute of $1,642 before tax ($1,554 after tax, or $7.34 per diluted share).
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Net cash provided by operating activities was $754 for fiscal 2011 year-to-date compared with $840
last year. The decrease primarily reflects reduced Net earnings partially offset by changes in
working capital.
Net cash used in investing activities was $211 for fiscal 2011 year-to-date compared with $369 last
year. The decrease primarily reflects lower capital spending and higher proceeds from the sale of
assets for fiscal 2011 year-to-date compared to last year.
Net cash used in financing activities was $551 for fiscal 2011 year-to-date compared with $442 last
year. The increase in cash used in financing activities is primarily attributable to higher levels
of debt reduction.
Management expects that the Company will continue to replenish operating assets with internally
generated funds. There can be no assurance, however, that the Companys business will continue to
generate cash flow at current levels. The Company will continue to obtain short-term or long-term
financing from its credit facilities. Long-term financing will be maintained through existing and
new debt issuances and its credit facilities. The Companys short-term and long-term financing
abilities are believed to be adequate as a supplement to internally generated cash flows to fund
capital expenditures and acquisitions as opportunities arise. Maturities of debt issued will
depend on managements views with respect to the relative attractiveness of interest rates at the
time of issuance and other debt maturities.
18
Table of Contents
Certain of the Companys credit facilities and long-term debt agreements have restrictive covenants
and cross-default provisions which generally provide, subject to the Companys right to cure, for
the acceleration of payments due in the event of a breach of the covenant or a default in the
payment of a specified amount of indebtedness due under certain other debt agreements. The Company
was in compliance with all such covenants and provisions for all periods presented.
On April 5, 2010, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the Credit
Agreement). The Credit Agreement provides for an extension of the maturity of portions of the
senior secured credit facilities provided under the original credit agreement, which included a
five-year revolving credit facility (the Revolving Credit Facility), a five-year term loan (Term
Loan A) and a six-year term loan (Term Loan B). Under the Credit Agreement, $1,500 of the
Revolving Credit Facility was extended until April 5, 2015 and $500 of Term Loan B was extended
until October 5, 2015. The remaining $600 of the Revolving Credit Facility will expire on June 2,
2011 and the remaining $502 of Term Loan B will mature on June 2, 2012. The maturity date of Term
Loan A was not extended and will mature on June 2, 2011.
The fees and rates in effect on outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement are based on the
Companys current credit ratings. Borrowings under the non-extended portion of the Revolving
Credit Facility, if any, carry an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.00 percent, borrowings under Term
Loan A carry an interest rate of LIBOR plus 0.875 percent and borrowings under the non-extended
portion of Term Loan B carry an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.25 percent. Borrowings under the
extended portion of the Revolving Credit Facility, if any, carry an interest rate of LIBOR plus
2.25 percent for revolving advances and Prime Rate plus 1.25 percent for base rate advances and
borrowings under the extended portion of Term Loan B carry an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.75
percent. Facility fees under the non-extended and extended portions of the Revolving Credit
Facility are 0.20 percent and 0.50 percent, respectively. The Company pays fees of up to 2.50
percent on the outstanding balance of the letters of credit issued under the extended Revolving
Credit Facility. Borrowings under the extended and non-extended term loans may be repaid, in full
or in part, at any time without penalty.
The Credit Agreement reset covenants which are generally less restrictive than the covenants that
existed prior to April 5, 2010. Specifically, the Company must maintain a leverage ratio no
greater than 4.25 to 1.0 through December 30, 2011, 4.0 to 1.0 from December 31, 2011 through
December 30, 2012 and 3.75 to 1.0 thereafter. Additionally, the Company must maintain an interest
expense coverage ratio of not less than 2.20 to 1.0 through December 30, 2011, 2.25 to 1.0 from
December 31, 2011 through December 30, 2012 and 2.30 to 1.0 thereafter.
All obligations under the senior secured credit facilities are guaranteed by each material
subsidiary of the Company. The obligations are also secured by a pledge of the equity interests in
those same material subsidiaries, limited as required by the existing public indentures of the
Company, such that the respective debt issued need not be equally and ratably secured.
In May 2010, the Company amended and extended its accounts receivable securitization program until
May 2013. The Company can borrow up to $200 on a revolving basis, with borrowings secured by
eligible accounts receivable, which remain under the Companys control. The facility fee in effect
on September 11, 2010, based on the Companys current credit ratings, was 0.80 percent. As of
September 11, 2010, there were $288 of accounts receivable pledged as collateral, classified in
Receivables in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
As of September 11, 2010, the Company had $403 of debt with current maturities that are classified
in Long-term debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the Companys intent to refinance such
obligations with the Revolving Credit Facility or other long-term debt.
Capital spending during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 was $139. Capital spending year-to-date
for fiscal 2011 was $312. Capital spending primarily included store remodeling activity and
technology expenditures. The Companys capital spending for fiscal 2011 is projected to be
approximately $700, including capital leases.
Fiscal 2011 total debt reduction is estimated to be approximately $650.
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Guarantees
The Company has guaranteed certain leases, fixture financing loans and other debt obligations of
various retailers as of September 11, 2010. These guarantees were generally made to support the
business growth of independent retail customers. The guarantees are generally for the entire terms
of the leases or other debt obligations with remaining terms that range from less than one year to
20 years, with a weighted average remaining term of approximately nine years. For each guarantee
issued, if the independent retail customer defaults on a payment, the Company would be required to
make payments under its guarantee. Generally, the guarantees are secured by indemnification
agreements or personal guarantees of the independent retail customer. The Company reviews
performance risk related to its guarantees of independent retail customers based on internal
measures of credit performance. As of September 11, 2010, the maximum amount of undiscounted
payments the Company would be required to make in the event of default of all of these guarantees
was $126 and represented $94 on a discounted basis. Based on the indemnification agreements,
personal guarantees and results of the reviews of performance risk, the Company believes the
likelihood that it will be required to assume a material amount of
19
Table of Contents
these obligations is remote. Accordingly, no amount has been recorded in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets for these contingent obligations under the Companys guarantee
arrangements.
The Company is contingently liable for leases that have been assigned to various third parties in
connection with facility closings and dispositions. The Company could be required to satisfy the
obligations under the leases if any of the assignees are unable to fulfill their lease obligations.
Due to the wide distribution of the Companys assignments among third parties, and various other
remedies available, the Company believes the likelihood that it will be required to assume a
material amount of these obligations is remote.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into supply contracts to purchase products
for resale. These contracts typically include volume commitments or fixed expiration dates,
termination provisions and other standard contractual considerations. As of September 11, 2010,
the Company had $1,281 of non-cancelable future purchase obligations primarily related to supply
contracts.
The Company is a party to a variety of contractual agreements under which the Company may be
obligated to indemnify the other party for certain matters, which indemnities may be secured by
operation of law or otherwise, in the ordinary course of business. These contracts primarily relate
to the Companys commercial contracts, operating leases and other real estate contracts, financial
agreements, agreements to provide services to the Company and agreements to indemnify officers,
directors and employees in the performance of their work. While the Companys aggregate
indemnification obligation could result in a material liability, the Company is not aware of any
matters that are expected to result in a material liability.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is a party to various legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business as
described in Part IIOther Information, Item 1, under the caption Legal Proceedings and in Note
10 Commitments, Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, none of which, in managements
opinion, is expected to have a material adverse impact on the Companys financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
Multi-Employer Plans
The Company contributes to various multi-employer pension plans under collective bargaining
agreements, primarily defined benefit pension plans. These plans generally provide retirement
benefits to participants based on their service to contributing employers. Based on available
information, the Company believes that some of the multi-employer plans to which it contributes are
underfunded. Company contributions to these plans could increase in the near term. However, the
amount of any increase or decrease in contributions will depend on a variety of factors, including
the results of the Companys collective bargaining efforts, investment returns on the assets held
in the plans, actions taken by the trustees who manage the plans and requirements under the Pension
Protection Act and Section 412(e) of the Internal Revenue Code. Furthermore, if the Company was to
significantly reduce contributions, exit certain markets or otherwise cease making contributions to
these plans, it could trigger a partial or complete withdrawal that would require the Company to
fund its proportionate share of a plans unfunded vested benefits. During the second quarter ended
September 11, 2010 and September 12, 2009, the Company contributed $73 and $78 to these plans,
respectively.
The Company also makes contributions to multi-employer health and welfare plans in amounts set
forth in the related collective bargaining agreements. A small minority of collective bargaining
agreements contain reserve requirements that may trigger unanticipated contributions resulting in
increased healthcare expenses. If these healthcare provisions cannot be renegotiated in a manner
that reduces the prospective healthcare cost as the Company intends, the Companys Selling and
administrative expenses could increase in the future.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes in the Companys contractual obligations since the end of
fiscal 2010. Refer to Item 7 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 27, 2010 for additional information regarding the Companys contractual obligations.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The description of critical accounting policies is included in Item 7 of the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 27, 2010, and is updated for the following:
Goodwill
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter of each year and also if an
event occurs or circumstances change that more-likely-than-not would reduce the fair value of a
reporting unit below its carrying amount. For the second quarter of fiscal 2011 the Companys
stock price had a significant and sustained decline and book value per share substantially exceeded
the stock price. As a result, the Company performed an interim impairment test of goodwill at the
end of the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Although this analysis has not been completed due to its
complexity, the analysis indicated that the fair value of one reporting unit with $2,756 of
goodwill was less than the carrying value, and based on the work performed to date, the Company has
recorded a
20
Table of Contents
preliminary estimate of a goodwill impairment charge of $1,450. The analysis indicated that the
fair value of another reporting unit with $807 of goodwill exceeded the carrying value by greater
than 10 percent and the remaining $137 of goodwill is at a reporting unit with fair value that
substantially exceeds the carrying value. The impairment charge is subject to finalization of fair
values which the Company will complete in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company believes
that the preliminary estimate of the impairment charge is reasonable and represents the Companys
best estimate of the impairment charge to be incurred; however, it is possible that material
adjustments to the preliminary estimate may be required as the analysis is finalized. If the
Companys stock price continues to experience further significant and sustained declines, the
Company would reassess the fair value of the implied goodwill compared to the carrying value.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE
SECURITIES
LITIGATION REFORM ACT
LITIGATION REFORM ACT
Any statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q regarding the outlook for the
Companys businesses and their respective markets, such as projections of future performance,
guidance, statements of the Companys plans and objectives, forecasts of market trends and other
matters, are forward-looking statements based on the Companys assumptions and beliefs. Such
statements may be identified by such words or phrases as will likely result, are expected to,
will continue, outlook, will benefit, is anticipated, estimate, project, management
believes or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in such
statements and no assurance can be given that the results in any forward-looking statement will be
achieved. For these statements, SUPERVALU INC. claims the protection of the safe harbor for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we disclaim any
obligation to subsequently revise any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances
after such date or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
Certain factors could cause the Companys future results to differ materially from those expressed
or implied in any forward-looking statements contained in this report. These factors include the
factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended February 27, 2010 under the heading Risk Factors, Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q and the factors discussed below and any other cautionary statements, written or
oral, which may be made or referred to in connection with any such forward-looking statements.
Since it is not possible to foresee all such factors, these factors should not be considered as
complete or exhaustive.
Economic Conditions
| Continued weakness in the economy or further adverse changes in economic conditions that affect consumer spending or buying habits | ||
| Increases in unemployment, healthcare costs, energy costs and commodity prices, which could impact consumer spending or buying habits and the cost of doing business | ||
| Changes in interest rates | ||
| Food and drug inflation or deflation | ||
| The outcome of negotiations with partners, governments, suppliers, unions or customers |
Execution of Initiatives
| The Companys ability to execute customer-focused initiatives designed to support the Companys vision of becoming Americas Neighborhood Grocer | ||
| The effectiveness of cost reduction strategies | ||
| The adequacy of the Companys capital resources to fund new store growth and remodeling activities that achieve appropriate returns on capital investment |
Competitive Practices
| The Companys ability to attract and retain customers | ||
| The Companys ability to hire, train or retain employees | ||
| Competition from other food or drug retail chains, supercenters, non-traditional competitors and emerging alternative formats in the Companys markets | ||
| Declines in the Companys Supply chain services sales due to increased wholesaler competition or increased customer self-distribution | ||
| Changes in demographics or consumer preferences that affect consumer spending habits | ||
| The impact of consolidation in the Retail food and Supply chain services industries | ||
| The success of the Companys promotional and sales programs and the Companys ability to respond to the promotional and pricing practices of competitors |
Food Safety
| Events that give rise to actual or potential food contamination, drug contamination or food-borne illness or any adverse |
21
Table of Contents
publicity relating to these types of concerns, whether or not valid |
Liquidity
| The Companys substantial indebtedness and its potential effect on the operation of the Companys business | ||
| The Companys ability to comply with debt covenants or to refinance the Companys debt obligations | ||
| A downgrade in the Companys debt ratings, which may increase the cost of borrowing or adversely affect the Companys ability to access one or more financial markets | ||
| The availability of favorable credit and trade terms |
Labor Relations
| Potential work disruptions resulting from labor disputes | ||
| Ability to negotiate labor contracts with acceptable terms |
Employee Benefit Costs
| Increased operating costs resulting from rising employee benefit costs or pension funding obligations |
Regulatory Matters
| The ability to timely obtain permits, comply with government regulations or make capital expenditures required to maintain compliance with government regulations | ||
| Changes in applicable laws and regulations that impose additional requirements or restrictions on the operation of the Companys businesses |
Self-Insurance
| Variability in actuarial projections regarding workers compensation and general and automobile liability | ||
| Potential increase in the number or severity of claims for which the Company is self-insured |
Legal and Administrative Proceedings
| Unfavorable outcomes in litigation, governmental or administrative proceedings or other disputes | ||
| Adverse publicity related to such unfavorable outcomes |
Information Technology
| Difficulties in developing, maintaining or upgrading information technology systems | ||
| Business disruptions or losses resulting from data theft, information espionage, or other criminal activity directed at the Companys computer or communications systems |
Severe Weather, Natural Disasters and Adverse Climate Changes
| Property damage or business disruption resulting from severe weather conditions and natural disasters that affect the Company, and the Companys customers or suppliers | ||
| Unseasonably adverse climate conditions that impact the availability or cost of certain products in the grocery supply chain |
Accounting Matters
| Changes in accounting standards that impact the Companys financial statements |
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment Charges
| Unfavorable changes in the Companys industry, the broader economy, market conditions, business operations, competition or the Companys stock price and market capitalization | ||
| Changes in the preliminary estimate of impairment charges, which the Company expects to finalize in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 |
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There were no material changes in market risk for the Company in the period covered by this report.
See the discussion of market risk in Item 7A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended February 27, 2010.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer,
have evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of September 11, 2010. Based on this
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and
22
Table of Contents
reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner that allows timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
In connection with the evaluation described above, there were no changes in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recently completed fiscal
quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
23
Table of Contents
PART
II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is subject to various lawsuits, claims and other legal matters that arise in the
ordinary course of conducting business, none of which, in managements opinion, is expected to have
a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
In September 2008, a class action complaint was filed against the Company, as well as International
Outsourcing Services, LLC (IOS), Inmar, Inc., Carolina Manufacturers Services, Inc., Carolina
Coupon Clearing, Inc. and Carolina Services, in the United States District Court in the Eastern
District of Wisconsin. The plaintiffs in the case are a consumer goods manufacturer, a grocery
co-operative and a retailer marketing services company who allege on behalf of a purported class
that the Company and the other defendants (i) conspired to restrict the markets for coupon
processing services under the Sherman Act and (ii) were part of an illegal enterprise to defraud
the plaintiffs under the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. The
plaintiffs seek monetary damages, attorneys fees and injunctive relief. The Company intends to
vigorously defend this lawsuit, however all proceedings have been stayed in the case pending the
result of the criminal prosecution of certain former officers of IOS. Although this lawsuit is
subject to the uncertainties inherent in the litigation process, based on the information presently
available to the Company, management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of this lawsuit
will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
In December 2008, a class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the
Western District of Wisconsin against the Company alleging that a 2003 transaction between the
Company and C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. (C&S) was a conspiracy to restrain trade and allocate
markets. In the 2003 transaction, the Company purchased certain assets of the Fleming Corporation
as part of Fleming Corporations bankruptcy proceedings and sold certain assets of the Company to
C&S which were located in New England. Since December 2008, three other retailers have filed
similar complaints in other jurisdictions. The cases have been consolidated and are proceeding in
the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. The complaints allege that the
conspiracy was concealed and continued through the use of non-compete and non-solicitation
agreements and the closing down of the distribution facilities that the Company and C&S purchased
from the other. Plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages, injunctive relief and attorneys fees.
The Company is vigorously defending these lawsuits. On September 14, 2009, the United States
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a subpoena to the Company requesting documents related to
the C&S transaction as part of the FTCs investigation into whether the Company and C&S engaged in
unfair methods of competition. The Company is cooperating with the FTC. Although this matter is
subject to the uncertainties inherent in the litigation process, based on the information presently
available to the Company, management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of this lawsuit
or the FTC investigation will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
On January 7, 2010, the Company received a subpoena from the Office of Inspector General for the
Department of Health and Human Services Milwaukee Field Office in connection with an investigation
of possible false or otherwise improper claims for payment under the Medicaid program. The subpoena
requests retail pharmacy claims data for dual eligible customers (i.e., customers with both
Medicaid and private insurance coverage), information concerning the Companys retail pharmacy
claims processing systems, copies of pharmacy payor contracts and other documents and records. The
Company is cooperating with the Office of Inspector General. Management cannot predict with
certainty the timing or outcome of any review by the government of such information.
On September 13, 2010, the Company entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the United
States Attorneys Office for the District of Maryland whereby the government agreed not to
prosecute the Company with regard to a consulting relationship with Maryland State Senator Ulysses
Currie, subject to certain terms and conditions. In exchange for the deferral of prosecution, the
Company agreed, among other things, to continue its cooperation with the government and pay a $3 fine.
The Company is also involved in routine legal proceedings incidental to its operations. Some of
these routine proceedings involve class allegations, many of which are ultimately dismissed.
Management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of these legal proceedings will have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The statements above reflect managements current expectations based on the information presently
available to the Company, however, predicting the outcomes of claims and litigation and estimating
related costs and exposures involves substantial uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes,
costs and exposures to vary materially from current expectations. In addition, the Company
regularly monitors its exposure to the loss contingencies associated with these matters and may
from time to time change its predictions with respect to outcomes and its estimates with respect to
related costs and exposures and believes recorded reserves are adequate. It is possible, although
management believes it is remote, that material differences in actual outcomes, costs and exposures
relative to current predictions and estimates, or material changes in such predictions or
estimates, could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
24
Table of Contents
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The Company is subject to various risks and uncertainties that could have a material impact on the
Companys business, financial condition or results of operations. The discussion of risk factors
is included in Part I, Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended February 27, 2010, and is updated for the following:
Substantial indebtedness
The Company has, and expects to continue to have, a substantial amount of debt. The Companys
substantial indebtedness may increase the Companys borrowing costs and decrease the Companys
business flexibility, making it more vulnerable to adverse economic conditions. For example, high
levels of debt could:
| require the Company to use a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations for the payment of principal and interest on its indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other purposes; |
| limit the Companys ability to obtain, or increase the cost at which the Company is able to obtain financing in order to refinance existing indebtedness and fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other purposes; and |
| limit the Companys ability to adjust to changing business and market conditions placing the Company at a competitive disadvantage relative to its competitors that have less debt. |
There are various financial covenants and other restrictions in the Companys debt instruments. If
the Company fails to comply with any of these requirements, the related indebtedness (and other
unrelated indebtedness) could become due and payable prior to its stated maturity and the Company
may not be able to repay the indebtedness that becomes due. A default under the Companys debt
instruments may also significantly affect the Companys ability to obtain additional or alternative
financing.
The Companys ability to comply with the covenants or to refinance the Companys obligations with
respect to the Companys indebtedness will depend on the Companys operating and financial
performance, which in turn is subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business
and other factors beyond the Companys control. These conditions and factors may also negatively
impact the Companys debt ratings, which may increase the cost of borrowing, adversely affect the
Companys ability to access one or more financial markets or result in a default under the
Companys debt instruments.
Any of these outcomes may adversely affect the Companys financial condition and results of
operations.
25
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Total Number of | Approximate | |||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased | Dollar Value of | |||||||||||||||
as Part of | Shares that May | |||||||||||||||
Publicly | Yet be Purchased | |||||||||||||||
Announced | Under the | |||||||||||||||
(in millions, except shares and per share | Total Number | Average | Treasury Stock | Treasury Stock | ||||||||||||
amounts) | of Shares | Price Paid | Purchase | Purchase | ||||||||||||
Period (1) | Purchased (2) | Per Share | Program (3) | Program (3) | ||||||||||||
First four weeks |
||||||||||||||||
June 20, 2010 to July 17, 2010 |
40,463 | $ | 12.12 | | $ | 70 | ||||||||||
Second four weeks |
||||||||||||||||
July 18, 2010 to August 14, 2010 |
3,545 | $ | 11.51 | | $ | 70 | ||||||||||
Third four weeks |
||||||||||||||||
August 15, 2010 to September 11, 2010 |
| $ | | | 70 | |||||||||||
Totals |
44,008 | $ | 12.07 | $ | 70 | |||||||||||
(1) | The reported periods conform to the Companys fiscal calendar composed of thirteen 28-day periods. The second quarter of fiscal 2011 contains three 28-day periods. | |
(2) | These amounts include the deemed surrender by participants in the Companys compensatory stock plans of 44,008 shares of previously issued common stock. These are in payment of the purchase price for shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of stock options and satisfaction of tax obligations arising from such exercises, as well as from the vesting of restricted stock awards granted under such plans. | |
(3) | On June 24, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted and announced a new annual share purchase program authorizing the Company to purchase up to $70 of the Companys common stock. Stock purchases will be made primarily from the cash generated from the settlement of stock options. This annual authorization program replaced the previously existing share purchase program and continues through June 2011. As of September 11, 2010, there remained $70 available to purchase the Companys common stock under the existing share purchase program. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
26
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
10.1
|
Severance Agreement and General Release, dated July 26, 2010, between SUPERVALU INC. and Pamela K. Knous.*# | |
10.2
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated April 5, 2010, by and among SUPERVALU INC., The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, CoBank, ACB, U.S. Bank N.A., Rabobank International, RBS Securities Inc., Barclays Capital and various financial institutions and other persons from time to time parties hereto. (Agreement previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 9, 2010; supersedes agreements listed as Exhibits 4.9 and 4.10 in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 27, 2010.) | |
10.3
|
Albertsons, Inc. Executive ASRE Makeup Plan, dated as of September 26, 1999. (Agreement previously filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Albertsons, Inc. (Commission File Number 1-6187) for the year ended February 3, 2000.)* | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101
|
The following information from the SUPERVALU INC. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 11, 2010, filed with the SEC on October 20, 2010, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Segment Financial Information, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. | |
*
|
Indicates management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K. | |
#
|
Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain portions of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
27
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SUPERVALU INC. (Registrant) |
||||
Dated: October 20, 2010 | /s/ SHERRY M. SMITH | |||
Sherry M. Smith | ||||
Senior Vice President, Finance and Interim Chief
Financial Officer (principal accounting officer) |
28
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
10.1
|
Severance Agreement and General Release, dated July 26, 2010, between SUPERVALU INC. and Pamela K. Knous.*# | |
10.2
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated April 5, 2010, by and among SUPERVALU INC., The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, CoBank, ACB, U.S. Bank N.A., Rabobank International, RBS Securities Inc., Barclays Capital and various financial institutions and other persons from time to time parties hereto. (Agreement previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 9, 2010; supersedes agreements listed as Exhibits 4.9 and 4.10 in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 27, 2010.) | |
10.3
|
Albertsons, Inc. Executive ASRE Makeup Plan, dated as of September 26, 1999. (Agreement previously filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Albertsons, Inc. (Commission File Number 1-6187) for the year ended February 3, 2000.)* | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101
|
The following information from the SUPERVALU INC. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 11, 2010, filed with the SEC on October 20, 2010, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Segment Financial Information, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. | |
*
|
Indicates management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K. | |
#
|
Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain portions of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
29