Attached files
| file | filename |
|---|---|
| EX-23 - EX-23 - BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD PARTNERSHIP | a10-12339_1ex23.htm |
| EX-13 - EX-13 - BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD PARTNERSHIP | a10-12339_1ex13.htm |
| EX-32.B - EX-32.B - BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD PARTNERSHIP | a10-12339_1ex32db.htm |
| EX-31.A - EX-31.A - BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD PARTNERSHIP | a10-12339_1ex31da.htm |
| EX-31.B - EX-31.B - BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD PARTNERSHIP | a10-12339_1ex31db.htm |
| EX-32.A - EX-32.A - BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II LTD PARTNERSHIP | a10-12339_1ex32da.htm |
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
x |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 or |
||
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-19443
BOSTON
CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware |
|
04-3066791 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
|
of incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
One Boston Place, Suite 2100, Boston, Massachusetts 02108
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (617)624-8900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class - Name of each exchange on which registered
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of class
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The following documents of the Partnership are incorporated by reference:
|
Form 10-K |
|
|
|
Parts |
|
Document |
|
|
|
|
|
Parts I, III |
|
Prospectus |
|
Parts II, IV |
|
|
BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
Organization
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership formed under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act as of June 28, 1989. Effective as of June 1, 2001 there was a restructuring, and as a result, the Partnership’s general partner was reorganized as follows. The general partner of the Partnership continues to be Boston Capital Associates II Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership. The general partner of the general partner is BCA Associates Limited Partnership, a Massachusetts limited partnership, whose sole general partner is C&M Management, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation. John P. Manning is the principal of Boston Capital Partners, Inc. and C&M Management Inc. The limited partner of the general partner is Capital Investment Holdings, a general partnership whose partners are certain officers and employees of Boston Capital Partners, Inc. and its affiliates. The assignor limited partner is BCTC II Assignor Corp., a Delaware corporation which is now wholly-owned by John P. Manning.
The assignor limited partner was formed for the purpose of serving in that capacity for the Partnership and will not engage in any other business. Units of beneficial interest in the limited partnership interest of the assignor limited partner have been assigned by the assignor limited partner by means of beneficial assignee certificates (“BACs”) to investors and investors are entitled to all the rights and economic benefits of a limited partner of the Partnership including rights to a percentage of the income, gains, losses, deductions, credits and distributions of the Partnership.
A Registration Statement on Form S-11 and the related prospectus, as supplemented (the “Prospectus”) was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and became effective October 25, 1989 in connection with a public offering (“Offering”) in Series 7, 9 through 12, and 14. The Partnership raised $186,337,517 representing a total of 18,678,688 BACs. The Partnership completed sales of BACs in all Series on January 27, 1992.
Description of Business
The Partnership’s principal business is to invest as a limited partner in other limited partnerships (the “Operating Partnerships”), each of which owns or leases and operates an apartment complex exclusively or partially for low- and moderate-income tenants. Each Operating Partnership in which the Partnership invested owns apartment complexes that are completed, newly constructed, under construction or rehabilitation, or to-be constructed or rehabilitated, and which are expected to receive Government Assistance.
Each apartment complex has qualified for the low-income housing tax credit under Section 42 of the Code (the “Federal Housing Tax Credit”), thereby providing tax benefits over a period of twelve years in the form of tax credits which investors may use to offset income, subject to strict limitations, from other sources. Certain of the apartment complexes also qualified for the historic rehabilitation tax credit under Section 47 of the Code (the “Rehabilitation Tax Credit”). The Federal Housing Tax Credit and the government assistance programs are described on pages 67 to 92 of the Prospectus, as supplemented, under the caption “Government
Assistance Programs,” which is incorporated herein by reference. Section 236 (f) (ii) of the National Housing Act, as amended, in Section 101 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965, as amended, each provide for the making by HUD of rent supplement payments to low income tenants in properties which receive other forms of federal assistance such as tax credits. The payments for each tenant, which are made directly to the owner of their property, generally are in such amounts as to enable the tenant to pay rent equal to 30% of the adjusted family income. Some of the apartment complexes in which the Partnership has invested are receiving such rent supplements from HUD. HUD has been in the process of converting rent supplement assistance to assistance paid not to the owner of the apartment complex, but directly to the individuals. At this time, the Partnership is unable to predict whether Congress will continue rent supplement programs payable directly to owners of the apartment complex.
As of March 31, 2010, the Partnership had invested in a total of 136 Operating Partnerships; 0 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 7, 24 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 9, 16 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 10, 17 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 11, 26 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 12, and 53 Operating Partnerships on behalf of Series 14. A description of these Operating Partnerships is set forth in Item 2 herein.
|
|
The business objectives of the Partnership are to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
preserve and protect the Partnership’s capital; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
provide current tax benefits to investors in the form of (a) Federal Housing Tax Credits and Rehabilitation Tax Credits, which an investor may apply, subject to certain strict limitations, against his federal income tax liability from active, portfolio and passive income, and (b) passive losses which an investor may apply to offset his passive income (if any); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
provide capital appreciation (except with respect to the Partnership’s investment in certain non-profit Operating Partnerships) through increases in value of the Partnership’s investments and, to the extent applicable, equity buildup through periodic payments on the mortgage indebtedness with respect to the apartment complexes; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
provide cash distributions (except with respect to the Partnership’s investment in certain non-profit Operating Partnerships) from a capital transaction as to the Partnership. The Operating Partnerships intend to hold the apartment complexes for appreciation in value. The Operating Partnerships may sell the apartment complexes after a period of time if financial conditions in the future make such sales desirable and if such sales are permitted by government restrictions; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
provide, on a current basis and to the extent available, cash distributions from the operations of the apartment complexes (no significant amount of which is anticipated). |
|
The business objectives and investment policies of the Partnership are described more fully on pages 44 to 52 of the Prospectus, as supplemented, under the caption “Business Objectives and Investment Policies,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
Plan of Liquidation
On March 3, 2010, our General Partner recommended that the BAC holders approve a plan of liquidation and dissolution for the Partnership, or the “Plan.” Pursuant to the Plan, the General Partner would be able to, without further action by the BAC holders:
· Liquidate the assets and wind up the business of the Partnership;
· make liquidating distributions in cancellation of the BACs;
· dissolve the Partnership after the sale of all of the Partnership’s assets; and
· take, or cause the Partnership to take, such other acts and deeds and shall do, or cause the Partnership to do, such other things, as are necessary or appropriate in connection with the dissolution, winding up and liquidation of the Partnership, the termination of the responsibilities and liabilities of the Partnership under applicable law, and the termination of the existence of the Partnership.
The adoption of the Plan is subject to the approval of the Plan by a majority of the BAC holders. For a more complete discussion of the Plan, see the Partnership’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on March 3, 2010.
As used in this Item 1A, references to “we, “us” and “our” mean the Partnership.
An investment in our BACs and our investments in Operating Partnerships are subject to risks. These risks may impact the tax benefits of an investment in our BACs, and the amount of proceeds available for distribution to our limited partners, if any, on liquidation of our investments.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the following factors which could materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. The risks described below are not the only risks we face. Additional factors not presently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business operations.
The ability of limited partners to claim tax losses from their investment in us is limited.
The IRS may audit us or an Operating Partnership and challenge the tax treatment of tax items. The amount of Low Income Housing Tax Credits and tax losses allocable to the investors could be reduced if the IRS were successful in such a challenge. The alternative minimum tax could reduce tax benefits from an investment in our BACs. Changes in tax laws could also impact the tax benefits from an investment in our BACs and/or the value of the Operating Partnerships. Until the Operating Partnerships have completed a mandatory fifteen year Low Income Housing Tax Credit compliance period, investors are at risk for potential recapture of Low Income Housing Tax Credits that have already been claimed.
The Low Income Housing Tax Credits rules are extremely complicated and noncompliance with these rules may have adverse consequences for BAC holders.
Noncompliance with applicable tax regulations may result in the loss of future Low Income Housing Tax Credits and the fractional recapture of Low Income Housing Tax Credits already taken. In most cases the annual amount of Low Income Housing Tax Credits that an individual can use is limited to the tax liability due on the person’s last $25,000 of taxable income. The limited partnerships may be unable to sell the Operating Partnerships at a price which would result in our realizing cash distributions or proceeds from the transaction. Accordingly, we may be unable to distribute any cash to our investors. Low Income Housing Tax Credits may be the only benefit from an investment in our BACs.
Poor performance of one housing complex, or the real estate market generally, could impair our ability to satisfy our investment objectives.
Each housing complex is subject to mortgage indebtedness. If an Operating Partnership failed to pay its mortgage, it could lose its housing complex in foreclosure. If foreclosure were to occur during the first 15 years of the existence of the Partnership, the loss of any remaining future Low Income Housing Tax Credits, a fractional recapture of previously claimed Low Income Housing Tax Credits, and a loss of our investment in the housing complex would occur. To the extent the Operating Partnerships receive government financing or operating subsidies, they may be subject to one or more of the following risks:
· difficulties in obtaining rent increases;
· limitations on cash distributions;
· limitations on sales or refinancing of Operating Partnerships;
· limitations on transfers of interests in Operating Partnerships;
· limitations on removal of local general partners;
· limitations on subsidy programs; and
· possible changes in applicable regulations.
The value of real estate is subject to risks from fluctuating economic conditions, including employment rates, inflation, tax, environmental, land use and zoning policies, supply and demand of similar properties, and neighborhood conditions, among others.
No trading market for the BACs exists or is expected to develop.
There is currently no active trading market for the BACs. Accordingly, limited partners may be unable to sell their BACs or may have to sell BACs at a discount. Limited partners should consider their BACs to be a long-term investment.
Investors may realize taxable gain on sale or disposition of BACs.
Upon the sale or other taxable disposition of BACs, investors will realize taxable income to the extent that their allocable share of the non-recourse mortgage indebtedness on the apartment complexes, together with the money they receive from the sale of the BACs, is greater than the original cost of their BACs. This realized taxable income is reduced to the extent that investors have suspended passive losses or credits. It is possible that the sale of BACs may not generate enough cash to pay the tax obligations arising from the sale.
Investors may have tax liability in excess of cash.
Investors eventually may be allocated profits for tax purposes which exceed any cash distributed to them. For this tax liability, the investor will have to pay federal income tax without a corresponding cash distribution. Similarly, in the event of a sale or foreclosure of an apartment complex or a sale of BACs, an investor may be allocated taxable income, resulting in tax liability, in excess of any cash distributed to him or her as a result of such event.
Investors may not receive cash if apartment complexes are sold.
There is no assurance that investors will receive any cash distributions from the sale or refinancing of an apartment complex. The price at which an apartment complex is sold may not be large enough to pay the mortgage and other expenses which must be paid at such time. Even if there are net cash proceeds from a sale, expenses such as accrued fund management fees and unpaid loans will be deducted pursuant to Section 4.02(a) of the Partnership Agreement. If any of these events happen, investors will not get all of their investment back, and the only benefit from an investment will be the tax credits received.
The sale or refinancing of the apartment complexes is dependent upon the following material factors:
· The necessity of obtaining the consent of the operating general partners;
· The necessity of obtaining the approval of any governmental agency(ies) providing government assistance to the apartment complex; and
· The uncertainty of the market.
Any sale may occur well after the fifteen-year federal housing tax credit compliance period.
We have insufficient sources of cash to pay our existing liabilities.
We currently do not have sufficient cash resources to satisfy our financial liabilities. Furthermore, we do not anticipate that we will have sufficient available cash to pay our future financial liabilities. Substantially all of our existing liabilities are payable to our general partner and its affiliates. Though the amounts payable to the general partner and its affiliates are contractually currently payable, we do not believe that the general partner or its affiliates will demand immediate payment of these contractual obligations in the near term; however, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. We would be materially adversely affected if the general partner or its affiliates demanded payment in the near term of our existing contractual liabilities or suspended the provision of services to us because of our inability to satisfy these obligations. All monies currently deposited, or that will be deposited in the future, into the Partnership’s working capital reserves are intended to be utilized to pay our existing and future liabilities.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
The Partnership has acquired a limited partnership interest in each of the 136 Operating Partnerships in 6 series identified in the table set forth below. In each instance the apartment complex owned by each of the Operating Partnerships is eligible for the Federal Housing Tax Credit. Initial occupancy of a unit in each apartment complex which complied with the minimum set-aside test (i.e., initial occupancy by tenants with incomes equal to no more than a certain percentage of area median income) and the rent restriction test (i.e., gross rent charged tenants does not exceed 30% of the applicable income standards) is referred to hereinafter as “Qualified Occupancy.” Each of the Operating Partnerships and each of the respective apartment complexes are described more fully in the Prospectus or applicable Report on Form 8-K filed during the past fiscal year. The general partner believes that there is adequate casualty insurance on the properties.
Please refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a more detailed discussion of operational difficulties experienced by certain of the Operating Partnerships.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 7
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
All properties in Series 7 have been disposed of.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 9
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Azalea Village Apartments |
|
Crawford, GA |
|
24 |
|
$ |
613,824 |
|
5/90 |
|
5/90 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
143,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Big Lake Seniors |
|
Big Lake, TX |
|
20 |
|
528,699 |
|
4/94 |
|
6/95 |
|
100 |
% |
145,660 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Blanco Senior Apt. |
|
Blanco, TX |
|
20 |
|
494,712 |
|
12/93 |
|
9/94 |
|
100 |
% |
98,561 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Cotton Mill Apartments |
|
Stuart, VA |
|
40 |
|
1,390,323 |
|
10/92 |
|
7/93 |
|
100 |
% |
271,351 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Fawn River Apartments |
|
Sturgis, MI |
|
100 |
|
3,544,293 |
|
10/90 |
|
10/90 |
|
100 |
% |
971,446 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Fountain Green Apartments |
|
Crestview, FL |
|
24 |
|
678,300 |
|
6/90 |
|
5/90 |
|
100 |
% |
164,534 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Garden Lake Apartments |
|
Immokalee, FL |
|
65 |
|
2,104,165 |
|
5/90 |
|
5/90 |
|
100 |
% |
577,529 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Glenwood Hotel |
|
Porterville, CA |
|
36 |
|
538,272 |
|
6/90 |
|
6/90 |
|
100 |
% |
383,100 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Grand Princess Manor |
|
St. Croix, USVI |
|
24 |
|
1,431,313 |
|
6/90 |
|
8/90 |
|
100 |
% |
374,766 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Grand Princess Villa |
|
St. Croix, USVI |
|
24 |
|
1,430,358 |
|
6/90 |
|
8/90 |
|
100 |
% |
276,203 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Grifton Manor Apts. |
|
Grifton, NC |
|
40 |
|
1,162,826 |
|
9/93 |
|
2/94 |
|
100 |
% |
261,645 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Hill St. Commons |
|
South Paris, ME |
|
25 |
|
1,418,281 |
|
11/92 |
|
10/92 |
|
100 |
% |
301,064 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Kristin Park Apartments |
|
Las Vegas, NV |
|
44 |
|
1,331,350 |
|
3/90 |
|
6/90 |
|
100 |
% |
313,200 |
|
||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 9
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
Continued
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Le Grand Apts. |
|
Le Grand, CA |
|
34 |
|
$ |
1,649,804 |
|
11/92 |
|
10/93 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
419,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Longmeadow Apartments |
|
Skowhegan, ME |
|
28 |
|
1,418,231 |
|
8/90 |
|
8/90 |
|
100 |
% |
284,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Magnolia Lane Apartments |
|
Bloomingdale, GA |
|
48 |
|
1,415,338 |
|
5/90 |
|
3/90 |
|
100 |
% |
321,908 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Meadowcrest Southfield, Apartments |
|
Southfield, MI |
|
83 |
|
2,558,876 |
|
9/90 |
|
10/90 |
|
100 |
% |
1,116,284 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Pine Ridge Place |
|
Polkton, NC |
|
16 |
|
602,426 |
|
1/94 |
|
12/93 |
|
100 |
% |
114,730 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Pleasanton Seniors Apts. |
|
Pleasanton, TX |
|
24 |
|
584,620 |
|
12/93 |
|
7/93 |
|
100 |
% |
144,839 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Quail Hollow II |
|
Raleigh, NC |
|
36 |
|
2,289,711 |
|
7/90 |
|
9/90 |
|
100 |
% |
313,521 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Raitt Street Apts. |
|
Santa Ana, CA |
|
6 |
|
840,616 |
|
5/93 |
|
8/93 |
|
100 |
% |
416,200 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Tappahannock Greens Apts. |
|
Tappahannock, VA |
|
40 |
|
1,436,735 |
|
3/94 |
|
5/94 |
|
100 |
% |
293,486 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Telluride Apartments |
|
Telluride, CO |
|
30 |
|
1,421,130 |
|
9/90 |
|
11/90 |
|
100 |
% |
300,033 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Village Oaks Apartments II |
|
Live Oak, FL |
|
24 |
|
698,769 |
|
6/90 |
|
2/90 |
|
100 |
% |
164,291 |
|
||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 10
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Athens Park Apartments |
|
Athens, AL |
|
48 |
|
$ |
1,288,346 |
|
8/90 |
|
6/90 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
354,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Autumn Lane Apartments |
|
Washington, GA |
|
24 |
|
703,779 |
|
8/89 |
|
11/90 |
|
100 |
% |
168,234 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Brentwood Apartments |
|
Eunice, LA |
|
32 |
|
915,220 |
|
11/90 |
|
10/90 |
|
100 |
% |
205,470 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Candlewick Place |
|
Monroeville, AL |
|
40 |
|
1,195,327 |
|
12/92 |
|
10/92 |
|
100 |
% |
241,600 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Cedarstone Apts. |
|
Poplarville, MS |
|
24 |
|
738,515 |
|
5/93 |
|
5/93 |
|
100 |
% |
180,800 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Lambert Square Apt. |
|
Lambert, MS |
|
32 |
|
933,018 |
|
11/92 |
|
12/92 |
|
100 |
% |
192,347 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Maidu Village |
|
Roseville, CA |
|
81 |
|
1,371,202 |
|
3/91 |
|
12/91 |
|
100 |
% |
470,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Meadowbrook Lane Apartments |
|
Americus, GA |
|
50 |
|
1,409,197 |
|
9/90 |
|
3/90 |
|
100 |
% |
336,264 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Pecan Village Apartments |
|
Ellaville, GA |
|
30 |
|
750,187 |
|
7/90 |
|
2/90 |
|
100 |
% |
221,856 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Pine Grove Apts. |
|
Ackerman, MS |
|
24 |
|
454,815 |
|
9/93 |
|
6/94 |
|
100 |
% |
169,926 |
|
||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 10
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
Continued
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Pinetree Manor Apts. |
|
Centreville, MS |
|
32 |
|
$ |
938,116 |
|
11/92 |
|
1/93 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
191,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Rosewood Village Apartments |
|
Willacoochee, GA |
|
24 |
|
621,126 |
|
7/90 |
|
7/90 |
|
100 |
% |
147,480 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Stratford Square Apartments |
|
Brundidge, AL |
|
24 |
|
721,223 |
|
10/92 |
|
2/93 |
|
100 |
% |
145,036 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Summer Glen Apartments |
|
Immokalee, FL |
|
45 |
|
1,409,673 |
|
11/92 |
|
3/93 |
|
100 |
% |
246,230 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Washington Heights Apartments, IV |
|
Bismarck, ND |
|
24 |
|
763,267 |
|
11/90 |
|
7/90 |
|
100 |
% |
381,010 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Woodside Apartments |
|
Lisbon, ME |
|
28 |
|
1,420,497 |
|
12/90 |
|
11/90 |
|
100 |
% |
397,630 |
|
||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 11
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Buckeye Senior Apartments |
|
Buckeye, AZ |
|
41 |
|
$ |
1,281,047 |
|
12/90 |
|
8/90 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
311,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Cambridge Manor Apartments |
|
Macon, MS |
|
47 |
|
1,529,543 |
|
5/93 |
|
4/93 |
|
100 |
% |
356,356 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Church Hill Apartments |
|
Church Point, LA |
|
32 |
|
915,001 |
|
12/90 |
|
1/91 |
|
100 |
% |
205,750 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Crestwood Apartments |
|
St. Cloud, FL |
|
216 |
|
2,936,140 |
|
1/91 |
|
6/91 |
|
100 |
% |
5,636,484 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Elmwood Manor Apartments |
|
Eutaw, AL |
|
47 |
|
1,553,119 |
|
5/93 |
|
12/93 |
|
100 |
% |
333,440 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Farmerville Square Apts. |
|
Farmerville, LA |
|
32 |
|
931,127 |
|
1/91 |
|
4/91 |
|
100 |
% |
212,280 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Holley Grove |
|
Holley, NY |
|
24 |
|
879,252 |
|
11/90 |
|
10/90 |
|
100 |
% |
207,360 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Ivan Woods Senior Apts. |
|
Delta Township, MI |
|
90 |
|
2,407,601 |
|
2/91 |
|
4/91 |
|
100 |
% |
1,184,275 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Kaplan Manor Apartments |
|
Kaplan, LA |
|
32 |
|
888,250 |
|
12/90 |
|
12/90 |
|
100 |
% |
198,460 |
|
||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 11
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
Continued
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Lakewood Village Apartments |
|
Lake Providence, LA |
|
32 |
|
$ |
911,651 |
|
1/91 |
|
5/91 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
223,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Maidu Village |
|
Roseville, CA |
|
81 |
|
1,371,202 |
|
3/91 |
|
12/91 |
|
100 |
% |
530,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Oatka Meadows |
|
Warsaw, NY |
|
24 |
|
879,812 |
|
11/90 |
|
6/90 |
|
100 |
% |
206,670 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Osage Place |
|
Arkansas City, KS |
|
38 |
|
1,179,823 |
|
12/90 |
|
12/90 |
|
100 |
% |
522,999 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
South Fork Heights |
|
South Fork, CO |
|
48 |
|
1,458,862 |
|
2/91 |
|
2/91 |
|
100 |
% |
343,358 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Twin Oaks Apartments |
|
Allendale, SC |
|
24 |
|
749,615 |
|
12/90 |
|
9/90 |
|
100 |
% |
206,888 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Washington Manor Apartments |
|
Washington, LA |
|
32 |
|
917,554 |
|
1/91 |
|
3/91 |
|
100 |
% |
216,990 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Wildridge Apartments |
|
Jesup, GA |
|
48 |
|
1,308,155 |
|
1/91 |
|
4/91 |
|
100 |
% |
329,130 |
|
||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 12
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Bowman Village Apartments |
|
Bowman, GA |
|
24 |
|
$ |
638,552 |
|
6/91 |
|
10/91 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
139,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Briarwick Apartments |
|
Nicholasville, KY |
|
40 |
|
1,123,686 |
|
4/91 |
|
4/91 |
|
100 |
% |
323,941 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Bridgerun Townhomes |
|
Cannon Falls, MN |
|
18 |
|
478,845 |
|
6/91 |
|
7/91 |
|
100 |
% |
458,800 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Carson Village Apartments |
|
Wrightsville, GA |
|
24 |
|
624,248 |
|
10/91 |
|
6/92 |
|
100 |
% |
161,452 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Corcoran Garden Apartments |
|
Corcoran, CA |
|
38 |
|
1,843,236 |
|
2/91 |
|
11/90 |
|
100 |
% |
432,438 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Crescent City Senior Apartments |
|
Crescent City, CA |
|
38 |
|
2,043,858 |
|
3/91 |
|
3/91 |
|
100 |
% |
474,536 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Earlimart Senior Apartments |
|
Earlimart, CA |
|
35 |
|
1,289,616 |
|
6/91 |
|
6/91 |
|
100 |
% |
364,515 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Fox Run Apartments |
|
Jesup, GA |
|
24 |
|
500,564 |
|
12/91 |
|
7/92 |
|
100 |
% |
150,033 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Hamilton Village Apartments |
|
Preston, GA |
|
20 |
|
544,458 |
|
10/91 |
|
3/92 |
|
100 |
% |
140,948 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Hunters Park Apartments |
|
Tarboro, NC |
|
40 |
|
1,351,431 |
|
5/91 |
|
4/91 |
|
100 |
% |
320,175 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Ivan Woods Senior Apartments |
|
Delta Township, MI |
|
90 |
|
2,407,601 |
|
2/91 |
|
4/91 |
|
100 |
% |
778,688 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Lakeridge Apartments |
|
Eufala, AL |
|
30 |
|
878,125 |
|
3/91 |
|
4/91 |
|
100 |
% |
186,780 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Laurel Village Apartments |
|
Wadley, GA |
|
24 |
|
633,105 |
|
10/91 |
|
5/92 |
|
100 |
% |
149,058 |
|
||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 12
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
Continued
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Los Caballos II Apts. |
|
Hatch, NM |
|
24 |
|
$ |
— |
|
7/91 |
|
8/91 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
164,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Melville Plaza Apartments |
|
Melville, LA |
|
32 |
|
852,749 |
|
7/91 |
|
10/91 |
|
100 |
% |
178,564 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Oakleigh Apartments |
|
Abbeville, LA |
|
32 |
|
873,664 |
|
8/91 |
|
3/92 |
|
100 |
% |
178,716 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Oakwood Apartments |
|
Mamou, LA |
|
32 |
|
857,769 |
|
8/91 |
|
1/92 |
|
100 |
% |
180,819 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Prairie West Apts. III |
|
West Fargo, ND |
|
24 |
|
681,622 |
|
3/91 |
|
3/91 |
|
100 |
% |
360,698 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Ridgeway Court III Apartments |
|
Bemidji, MN |
|
24 |
|
982,951 |
|
4/91 |
|
1/91 |
|
100 |
% |
180,186 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Rockmoor Apartments |
|
Banner Elk, NC |
|
12 |
|
538,709 |
|
5/91 |
|
3/91 |
|
100 |
% |
95,818 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Turner Lane Apartments |
|
Ashburn, GA |
|
24 |
|
691,722 |
|
5/91 |
|
7/91 |
|
100 |
% |
147,090 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Uptown Apartments |
|
Salyersville, KY |
|
16 |
|
495,659 |
|
5/91 |
|
3/91 |
|
100 |
% |
121,700 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Villas of Lakeridge |
|
Eufala, AL |
|
18 |
|
509,660 |
|
3/91 |
|
3/91 |
|
100 |
% |
96,868 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Woodcrest Manor Apartments |
|
Woodville, MS |
|
24 |
|
678,841 |
|
6/91 |
|
11/91 |
|
100 |
% |
138,579 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Woodlawn Village Apartments |
|
Abbeville, GA |
|
36 |
|
969,494 |
|
10/91 |
|
4/92 |
|
100 |
% |
229,601 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Yorkshire Townhome Apts. |
|
Fort Smith, AR |
|
50 |
|
558,506 |
|
9/93 |
|
8/94 |
|
100 |
% |
874,069 |
|
||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 14
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Ada Village Apts. |
|
Ada, OK |
|
44 |
|
$ |
944,252 |
|
1/93 |
|
11/93 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
158,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Blanchard Senior Apts. II |
|
Blanchard, LA |
|
24 |
|
570,839 |
|
10/91 |
|
9/91 |
|
100 |
% |
143,628 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Blanchard Village Apts. |
|
Blanchard, OK |
|
8 |
|
201,837 |
|
1/93 |
|
7/93 |
|
100 |
% |
32,954 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Brantwood Lane Apartments |
|
Centreville, AL |
|
36 |
|
1,096,636 |
|
7/91 |
|
9/91 |
|
100 |
% |
237,873 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
The Bridge Building |
|
New York, NY |
|
15 |
|
— |
|
1/92 |
|
12/91 |
|
100 |
% |
1,037,770 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Buchanan Court |
|
Warren, PA |
|
18 |
|
694,545 |
|
7/91 |
|
11/90 |
|
100 |
% |
160,600 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Carriage Run Apartments |
|
Emporia, VA |
|
40 |
|
1,222,582 |
|
10/91 |
|
4/92 |
|
100 |
% |
259,980 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Cedar View Apartments |
|
Brinkley, AR |
|
32 |
|
1,208,419 |
|
5/92 |
|
10/92 |
|
100 |
% |
254,016 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Cedarwood Apartments |
|
Pembroke, NC |
|
36 |
|
1,352,220 |
|
10/91 |
|
1/92 |
|
100 |
% |
326,310 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
College Green |
|
Chili, NY |
|
110 |
|
3,629,202 |
|
3/95 |
|
8/95 |
|
100 |
% |
755,771 |
|
||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 14
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
Continued
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Colorado City Seniors Apartments |
|
Colorado City, TX |
|
24 |
|
$ |
520,532 |
|
10/91 |
|
10/91 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
98,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Cottonwood Apts. II |
|
Cottonport LA |
|
24 |
|
628,233 |
|
10/91 |
|
7/91 |
|
100 |
% |
152,664 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Countryside Manor |
|
Fulton, MS |
|
24 |
|
641,103 |
|
10/91 |
|
8/91 |
|
100 |
% |
151,868 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Davis Village Apts. |
|
Davis, OK |
|
44 |
|
1,072,816 |
|
1/93 |
|
9/93 |
|
100 |
% |
180,452 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Devenwood Apartments |
|
Ridgeland, SC |
|
24 |
|
831,392 |
|
7/92 |
|
1/93 |
|
100 |
% |
186,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Duncan Village Apts. |
|
Duncan, OK |
|
48 |
|
1,022,356 |
|
1/93 |
|
11/93 |
|
100 |
% |
172,005 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Edison Village Apartments |
|
Edison, GA |
|
42 |
|
1,136,539 |
|
7/91 |
|
2/92 |
|
100 |
% |
274,144 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Fairground Place Apts. |
|
Bedford, KY |
|
19 |
|
665,676 |
|
3/95 |
|
8/95 |
|
100 |
% |
176,963 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Franklin Vista III Apts. |
|
Anthony, NM |
|
28 |
|
887,944 |
|
1/92 |
|
4/92 |
|
100 |
% |
179,685 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Friendship Village |
|
Bel Air, MD |
|
32 |
|
1,381,226 |
|
1/92 |
|
6/91 |
|
100 |
% |
226,000 |
|
||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 14
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
Continued
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Greenleaf Apartments |
|
Bowdoinham, ME |
|
21 |
|
$ |
1,080,534 |
|
11/91 |
|
8/92 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
295,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Hughes Springs Seniors Apartments |
|
Hughes Springs, TX |
|
32 |
|
755,740 |
|
10/91 |
|
8/91 |
|
100 |
% |
183,674 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Hessmer Village Apartments |
|
Hessmer, LA |
|
32 |
|
868,212 |
|
12/91 |
|
4/92 |
|
100 |
% |
186,503 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Jarratt Village Apartments |
|
Jarratt, VA |
|
24 |
|
791,343 |
|
10/91 |
|
12/91 |
|
100 |
% |
159,140 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Kingfisher Village Apts. |
|
Kingfisher, OK |
|
8 |
|
139,805 |
|
1/93 |
|
12/93 |
|
100 |
% |
24,365 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
La Gema del Barrio Apts. |
|
Santa Ana, CA |
|
6 |
|
593,772 |
|
6/92 |
|
8/92 |
|
100 |
% |
458,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Lafayettee Gardens Apartments |
|
Scott, LA |
|
56 |
|
928,072 |
|
10/91 |
|
11/91 |
|
100 |
% |
437,688 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Lake Isabella Senior Apartments |
|
Lake Isabella, CA |
|
46 |
|
1,915,024 |
|
9/91 |
|
1/92 |
|
100 |
% |
442,457 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Lakeview Meadows |
|
Battle Creek, MI |
|
53 |
|
1,376,301 |
|
1/92 |
|
6/92 |
|
100 |
% |
1,018,808 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Lana Lu Apartments |
|
Lonaconing, MD |
|
30 |
|
1,421,208 |
|
12/91 |
|
9/92 |
|
100 |
% |
303,261 |
|
||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 14
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
Continued
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Lexington Village Apts. |
|
Lexington, OK |
|
8 |
|
$ |
191,731 |
|
1/93 |
|
11/93 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
32,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Maidu Village |
|
Roseville, CA |
|
81 |
|
1,371,202 |
|
1/92 |
|
12/91 |
|
100 |
% |
1,096,199 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Marion Apartments |
|
Manor Marion,LA |
|
32 |
|
955,102 |
|
2/92 |
|
6/92 |
|
100 |
% |
199,708 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Maysville Village Apts. |
|
Maysville, OK |
|
8 |
|
199,079 |
|
1/93 |
|
10/93 |
|
100 |
% |
33,726 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Montague Place Apartments |
|
Caro, MI |
|
28 |
|
1,090,648 |
|
12/91 |
|
12/91 |
|
100 |
% |
432,320 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Nevada City Senior Apartments |
|
Grass Valley, CA |
|
60 |
|
3,402,959 |
|
1/92 |
|
10/92 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
839,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Newellton Place Apartments |
|
Newellton, LA |
|
32 |
|
875,112 |
|
2/92 |
|
4/92 |
|
100 |
% |
190,600 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
New River Overlook Apartments |
|
Radford, VA |
|
40 |
|
1,419,206 |
|
8/91 |
|
2/92 |
|
100 |
% |
285,371 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Oak Ridge Apartments |
|
Crystal Springs, MS |
|
40 |
|
1,245,267 |
|
1/92 |
|
1/92 |
|
100 |
% |
308,578 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Pineridge Apartments |
|
McComb, MS |
|
32 |
|
972,401 |
|
10/91 |
|
10/91 |
|
100 |
% |
238,995 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Pineridge Elderly |
|
Walnut Cove, NC |
|
24 |
|
914,435 |
|
10/91 |
|
3/92 |
|
100 |
% |
199,311 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Prague Village Apts. |
|
Prague, OK |
|
8 |
|
107,508 |
|
1/93 |
|
3/93 |
|
100 |
% |
21,373 |
|
||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership - Series 14
PROPERTY PROFILES AS OF MARCH 31, 2010
Continued
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Units |
|
Mortgage |
|
Acq |
|
Const |
|
Qualified |
|
Cap Con |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Rainier Manor Apartments |
|
Mt. Rainier, MD |
|
104 |
|
$ |
3,327,583 |
|
3/92 |
|
1/93 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
1,190,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Rosewood Manor Apartments |
|
Ellenton, FL |
|
43 |
|
1,381,363 |
|
12/91 |
|
11/91 |
|
100 |
% |
302,250 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Snow Hill Ridge Apartments |
|
Raleigh, NC |
|
32 |
|
1,089,202 |
|
10/91 |
|
12/91 |
|
100 |
% |
307,524 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Spring Valley Apartments |
|
Lexington Park, MD |
|
128 |
|
4,877,942 |
|
11/91 |
|
12/92 |
|
100 |
% |
2,877,811 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Titusville Apartments |
|
Titusville, PA |
|
30 |
|
1,184,446 |
|
12/91 |
|
1/92 |
|
100 |
% |
280,829 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Valley Ridge Senior Apartments |
|
Central Valley, CA |
|
38 |
|
1,742,445 |
|
1/92 |
|
12/91 |
|
100 |
% |
456,600 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Victoria Place |
|
Victoria, VA |
|
39 |
|
1,260,269 |
|
1/92 |
|
6/92 |
|
100 |
% |
287,736 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Washington Court |
|
Abingdon, VA |
|
39 |
|
1,060,487 |
|
7/91 |
|
8/91 |
|
100 |
% |
295,250 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Wesley Village Apartments |
|
Martinsburg, WV |
|
36 |
|
1,250,499 |
|
10/91 |
|
6/92 |
|
100 |
% |
266,253 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Westside Apartments |
|
Louisville, MS |
|
33 |
|
682,935 |
|
3/92 |
|
1/92 |
|
100 |
% |
191,014 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Wynnewood Village Apts. |
|
Wynnewood, OK |
|
16 |
|
406,222 |
|
1/93 |
|
11/93 |
|
100 |
% |
67,443 |
|
||
|
Market for the Registrant’s Partnership Interests, Related Partnership Matters and Issuer Purchases of Partnership Interest |
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
(a) |
Market Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership is classified as a limited partnership and has no common stock. There is no established public trading market for the BACs and it is not anticipated that any public market will develop. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Approximate number of security holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, the Partnership has 10,549 registered BAC holders for an aggregate of 18,678,688 BACs which were offered at a subscription price of $10 per BAC.
The BACs were issued in series. Series 7 consists of 734 investors holding 1,036,100 BACs, Series 9 consists of 1,999 investors holding 4,178,029 BACs, Series 10 consists of 1,491 investors holding 2,428,925 BACs, Series 11 consists of 1,260 investors holding 2,489,599 BACs, Series 12 consists of 1,773 investors holding 2,972,795 BACs, and Series 14 consists of 3,292 investors holding 5,573,240 BACs at March 31, 2010. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Dividend history and restriction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership has made no distributions of net cash flow to its BAC holders from its inception, June 28, 1989, through March 31, 2010. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership Agreement provides that profits, losses and credits will be allocated each month to the holder of record of a BAC as of the last day of such month. Allocation of profits, losses and credits among BAC holders will be made in proportion to the number of BACs held by each BAC holder. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any distributions of net cash flow or liquidation, sale or refinancing proceeds will be made within 180 days of the end of the annual period to which they relate. Distributions will be made to the holders of record of a BAC as of the last day of each month in the ratio which (i) the BACs held by the holder on the last day of the calendar month bears to (ii) the aggregate number of BACs outstanding on the last day of such month. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership allocations and distributions are described on pages 107 to 112 of the Prospectus, as supplemented, which are incorporated herein by reference. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
During the year ended March 31, 2010, the Partnership made no distributions to the limited partners for proceeds from the sale of Operating Partnerships. |
||
|
Selected Financial Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not Applicable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
||
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements such as our intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations, strategies and predictions of our future activities, or other future events or conditions. Such statements are “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1993, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainty, including, without limitation, the factors identified in Part I, Item 1A of this Report. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved.
Liquidity
The Partnership’s primary source of funds was the proceeds of the Offering. Other sources of liquidity include (i) interest earned on capital contributions unpaid as of March 31, 2010 and on working capital reserves and (ii) cash distributions from operations of the Operating Partnerships in which the Partnership has invested. These sources of liquidity, along with the Partnership’s working capital reserve, are available to meet the obligations of the Partnership. The Partnership does not anticipate significant cash distributions from operations of the Operating Partnerships.
The Partnership is currently accruing the annual partnership management fee to enable each series to meet current and future third party obligations. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 the Partnership accrued $1,119,566 and paid $3,030,000 in annual partnership management fees. As of March 31, 2010 the accrued partnership management fees totaled $21,611,037. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, these liabilities will be deferred until the Partnership receives sale or refinancing proceeds from Operating Partnerships, and at that time proceeds from these sales or refinancing will be used to satisfy these liabilities. The Partnership anticipates that there will be sufficient cash to meet future third party obligations. The Partnership does not anticipate significant cash distributions in the long or short term from operations of the Operating Partnerships.
Affiliates of the general partner have advanced $153,188 to the Partnership to pay certain third party operating expenses and to fund advances to Operating Partnerships. The allocation of the total advanced through March 31, 2010, to one of the six series is as follows: $153,188 to Series 12. These, and any additional advances, will be paid, without interest, from available cash flow, reporting fees, or the proceeds of the sale or refinancing of the Partnership’s interest in Operating Partnerships. The Partnership anticipates that as the Operating Partnerships continue to mature, more cash flow and reporting fees will be generated. Cash flow and reporting fees will be added to the Partnership’s working capital and will be
available to meet future third party obligations of the Partnership. The Partnership is currently pursuing, and will continue to pursue, available cash flow and reporting fees and anticipates that the amount collected will be sufficient to cover third party operating expenses.
Capital
Resources
The Partnership offered BACs in the Offering declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 1989. The Partnership received and accepted
subscriptions for $186,337,517 representing 18,678,688 BACs from investors
admitted as BAC holders in Series 7, 9 through 12 and 14 of the
Partnership.
Offers and sales of BACs in Series 7, 9 through 12, and 14 of the Partnership were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 14 were issued by the Partnership on January 27, 1992.
(Series 7). The Partnership commenced offering BACs in Series 7 on November 14, 1989. The Partnership had received and accepted subscriptions for $10,361,000, representing 1,036,100 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 7. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 7 were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 7 were issued by the Partnership on December 29, 1989.
As of March 31, 2010, the net proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 7 had been used to invest in a total of 15 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $7,774,651, and the Partnership had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2010, all 15 of the properties had been disposed of. Cash and Cash Equivalents for Series 7 at March 31, 2010, represented $0 in working capital.
(Series 9). The Partnership commenced offering BACs in Series 9 on February 1, 1990. The Partnership had received and accepted subscriptions for $41,574,518, representing 4,178,029 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 9. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 9 were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 9 were issued by the Partnership on April 30, 1990.
As of March 31, 2010, the net proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 9 had been used to invest in a total of 55 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $31,605,286, and the Partnership had completed payment of installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2010, 31 of the properties had been disposed of and 24 remain. Cash and Cash Equivalents for Series 9 at March 31, 2010, represented $115,148 in working capital.
(Series 10). The Partnership commenced offering BACs in Series 10 on May 7, 1990. The Partnership had received and accepted subscriptions for $24,288,997 representing 2,428,925 BACs from investors admitted as BAC holders in Series 10. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 10 were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 10 were issued by the Partnership on August 24, 1990.
As of March 31, 2010, the net proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 10 had been used to invest in a total of 45 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $18,555,455, and the Partnership had completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2010, 29 of the properties had been disposed of and 16 remain. Cash and Cash Equivalents for Series 10 at March 31, 2010, represented $186,720 in working capital.
(Series 11). The Partnership commenced offering BACs in Series 11 on September 17, 1990. The Partnership had received and accepted subscriptions for $24,735,002, representing 2,489,599 BACs in Series 11. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 11 were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 11 were issued by the Partnership on December 31, 1990.
As of March 31, 2010, the net proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 11 had been used to invest in a total of 40 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $18,894,372. As of March 31, 2010, 23 of the properties had been disposed of and 17 remain. The Partnership has completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. Cash and Cash Equivalents for Series 11 at March 31, 2010, represented $603,898 in working capital.
(Series 12). The Partnership commenced offering BACs in Series 12 on February 1, 1991. The Partnership had received and accepted subscriptions for $29,649,003, representing 2,972,795 BACs in Series 12. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 12 were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 12 were issued by the Partnership on April 30, 1991.
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, the Partnership did not use any of Series 12’s net offering proceeds to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. As of March 31, 2010, the net proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 12 had been used to invest in a total of 53 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $22,356,179. As of March 31, 2010, 27 of the properties had been disposed of and 26 remain. The Partnership has completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 25 of the 26 remaining Operating Partnerships. At March 31, 2010, working capital of $111,616 consists of cash and cash equivalents less capital contributions payable.
(Series 14). The Partnership commenced offering BACs in Series 14 on May 20, 1991. The Partnership had received and accepted subscriptions for $55,728,997, representing 5,573,240 BACs in Series 14. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 14 were completed and the last of the BACs in Series 14 were issued by the Partnership on January 27, 1992.
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, the Partnership did not use any of Series 14’s net offering proceeds to pay installments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnership. As of March 31, 2010 the net proceeds from the offer and sale of BACs in Series 14 had been used to invest in a total of 101 Operating Partnerships in an aggregate amount of $42,034,328. As of March 31, 2010, 48 of the properties had been disposed of and 53 remain. The Partnership has completed payment of all installments of its capital contributions to 43 of the remaining 53 Operating Partnerships. At March 31, 2010, working capital of $230,851 consists of cash and cash equivalents less capital contributions payable.
Results of Operations
The Partnership incurs an annual partnership management fee payable to its general partner and/or its affiliates in an amount equal to 0.5% of the aggregate cost of the apartment complexes owned by the Operating Partnerships, less the amount of certain partnership management and reporting fees paid by the Operating Partnerships. The annual partnership management fee, net of reporting fees received, charged to operations for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $793,585 and $943,338, respectively. The Partnership’s investment objectives do not include receipt of significant cash distributions from the Operating Partnerships in which it has invested. The Partnership’s investments in Operating Partnerships have been made principally with a view towards realization of Federal Housing Tax Credits for allocation to its partners and BAC holders.
(Series 7). The series did not have any properties at March 31, 2010.
For the tax years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the series, in total, generated $(28,441) and $482,559, respectively, in passive tax income(losses) that was passed through to the investors.
As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 7 was $0. Investments in Operating Partnerships were affected by the way the Partnership accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Partnership adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership’s results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.
For the years ended March 31, 2010, and 2009, the net income(loss) for series 7 was $(17,915) and $26,922, respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Partnership’s share of income from Operating Partnership and the professional fees.
In August 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Briarwood Apartments, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $601,350 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $25,680. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $20,680 was returned to cash reserves held by Series 7. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $20,680 as of September 30, 2008.
In August 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Lebanon Properties II LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $555,337 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $25,680. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $20,680 was returned to cash reserves held by Series 7. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized
to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $20,680 as of September 30, 2008.
In August 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Oak Grove Estates LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $466,923 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $21,400. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $16,400 was returned to cash reserves held by Series 7. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $16,400 as of September 30, 2008.
(Series 9). As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%, respectively. The series had a total of 24 properties as of March 31, 2010, all of which were at 100% qualified occupancy.
For the tax years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the series, in total, generated $525,915 and $2,363,352, respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that was passed through to the investors.
As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 9 were $0. Investments in Operating Partnerships were affected by the way the Partnership accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Partnership adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership’s results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.
For the years ended March 31, 2010, and 2009, the net income(loss) for series 9 was $(237,687) and $133,887, respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Partnership’s share of income from Operating Partnership and the partnership management fee.
Sunshine Apartments (Telluride Apartments) is a 50 unit family development located in Telluride, CO. In 2008, water infiltrated approximately 50% of the units which led to the units being condemned. The decline in occupancy continued through 2009 and as of December 31, 2009 the property was 50% physically occupied and operating below breakeven. The drop in occupancy was due to major mold issues resulting in 25 units being off-line. The operating general partner indicated that the property will need $753,807 in repairs to put the down units back on-line. The Operating Partnership does not have the
funds available to do the work. Additionally, the operating general partner was unsuccessful in obtaining an emergency loan or preservation funding from Rural Development. Through the first quarter 2010 the property is continuing to operate with low occupancy and as a result unable to breakeven. As of March 2010, the property was 50% occupied. The investment general partner is continuing to work with management to maximize operating cash flow. The 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2004. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership. The mortgage, real estate tax and insurance payments are all current.
In November 2009, the operating general partner of Sunshine Apartments approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction is scheduled to close in December 2010. The anticipated sales price for the property is $1,613,420, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,413,420 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $175,000. Of the total proceeds estimated to be received, it is expected that $15,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $160,000 are anticipated to be returned to cash reserves held by Series 9. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution.
Glenwood Hotel Investors (Glenwood Hotel) is a 36-unit single room occupancy development, located in Porterville, CA. Through the fourth quarter of 2009, average physical occupancy remained strong at 100% but the property was still not able to breakeven. Through first quarter 2010 the property was 97% occupied. However, despite the continued strong occupancy, the property is operating below breakeven. To maintain a high occupancy level and to be competitive in the market, it is necessary to keep rental rates very low. The management agent continues to market the available units to the housing authority as well as performing various outreach efforts to attract qualified residents. The operating general partner continues to fund the Operating Partnership as needed. The mortgage, insurance and payables are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period for this Operating Partnership expired on December 31, 2005.
Blanco Seniors Apartments Ltd (Blanco Seniors Apartments) is a 20-unit elderly development located in Blanco, Texas. Occupancy was strong averaging 99% for 2008 and remained steady averaging 98% in 2009. Expenses in 2009 remained consistent with 2008 totals. The property operated above breakeven in 2008 and 2009. The operating deficit guarantee is unlimited in time and amount. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
Fountain Green Apartments, Limited (Fountain Green Apartments) is a 24-unit property located in Crestview, FL. Audited financials confirmed above breakeven operations in both 2007 and 2008 with strong occupancy. Occupancy declined to an average of 84% through the first three quarters of 2009, but rebounded to 100% by year-end. Occupancy in the first quarter of 2010 remained strong at 94%. The property continues to operate above breakeven. All insurance, real estate taxes, and mortgage payments are current. Tax credit delivery ended in 2002 and the low income housing tax credit compliance period expired in 2007.
In December 2007, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer 99% of its interest in Haines City Apartments Limited to a non-affiliated entity for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,374,226 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of
$48,000. Of the total proceeds received, $8,208 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $32,292 was returned to cash reserves held by Series 9. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partner’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $32,292 as of December 31, 2007. The transfer of the Operating Partnership had been recognized as of December 31, 2007, and the proceeds were received in the first quarter of 2008. The sale of the remaining 1% investment partnership interest in the Operating Partnership closed in December 2008 for the purchaser’s assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $13,881 and cash proceeds of $10,000. The remaining proceeds of $10,000 was returned to cash reserves and recorded as a gain as of December 31, 2008.
In November 2009, the operating general partner of Westside Associates LP entered into an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on December 23, 2009. The sales price of the property was $2,102,654, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,102,653 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $0. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
In September 2007, the investment general partner of Blakely Properties LP approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on September 26, 2008. The sales price for the property was $1,495,446, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $993,951 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $294,000. Of the total proceeds received, $18,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which include third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $268,500 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 9. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $268,500 as of September 30, 2008.
In October 2008, the investment general partner of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund I - Series 6 and Series 9, respectively, entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Hacienda Villa Associates LP to a non-affiliated entity for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of
approximately $5,943,874 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partnerships of $103,200 and $111,800 to Series 6 and Series 9, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $47,520 and $51,480 to Series 6 and Series 9, respectively, represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnerships and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $12,000 and $13,000 from Series 6 and Series 9, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $43,680 and $47,320 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 6 and Series 9, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the transfer, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $43,680 and $47,320 to Series 6 and Series 9, respectively, as of December 31, 2008.
In December 2008, the investment general partner of Putney First entered into an agreement to transfer its interest to a non-affiliated entity for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,381,477 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $41,444. Of the total proceeds received, $22,710 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $11,234 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 9. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $11,234 as of December 31, 2008.
In January 2009, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Newfane Seniors LP to a non-affiliated entity for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $832,737 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $25,032. Of the total proceeds received, $1,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,100 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $18,432 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 9. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had
previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $18,432 as of March 31, 2009.
In January 2009, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Southwestern LP to a non-affiliated entity for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,376,318 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $41,373. Of the total proceeds received, $3,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,165 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $33,208 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 9. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $33,208 as of March 31, 2009.
In July 2009, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Beaver Brook Housing Associates LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,133,100 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $35,000. Of the total proceeds received, $5,750 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $21,750 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 9. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment limited partnership entered into a partner interest pledge agreement with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the partner interest pledge agreement, if the property owned by the Operating Partnership is sold, within 5 years from the initial transfer date, there would be a residual payment of up to $500,000 distributable to the investment limited partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partner transferred its interest. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $21,750 as of September 30, 2009.
Big Lake Seniors Apartments (Big Lake Seniors) is a 20 unit elderly development located in Big Lake, TX. The property performed well in 2008 with average occupancy of 99%. In 2009, occupany averaged 90% and the property operated above breakeven. In 2009, there was a substantial increase in maintenance costs due to several floors being replaced. The operating
general partner requested and received funds from the replacement reserve account to help off-set these costs. Through the first quarter of 2010, average occupancy is 93% and the property continues to operate above breakeven. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expired at year end 2009.
(Series 10). As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 16 properties at March 31, 2010, all of which were at 100% qualified occupancy.
For the tax years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 the series, in total, generated $158,030 and $607,368, respectively, in passive tax income(losses) that was passed through to the investors.
As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 10 were $0. Investments in Operating Partnerships were affected by the way the Partnership accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Partnership adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership’s results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.
For the years ended March 31, 2010, and 2009, the net income(loss) for series 10 was $808,598 and $(184,522), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Partnership’s share of income from Operating Partnership, impairment losses, and the partnership management fee.
In October 2008, the investment general partner of Great Falls Properties LP approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed in September 2009. The sales price for the property was $952,757, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $852,757 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partners of $62,241. Of the total proceeds received, $14,048 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $15,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $33,193 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 10. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $33,193 as of September 30, 2009. The sale of the Operating Partnership has been recognized as of September 30, 2009, but the sale proceeds were received in October 2009.
In August 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Ironton Estates LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $596,371 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $25,680. Of the total proceeds, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $20,680 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 10. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the
time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $20,680 as of September 30, 2008.
In August 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Stockton Estates, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $427,070 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $12,840. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $7,840 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 10. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $7,840 as of September 30, 2008.
In July 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Butler Properties to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $485,544 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $18,400. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $13,400 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 10. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $13,400 as of September 30, 2008.
In July 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Hart Properties Ltd. to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $883,613 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $36,800. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $31,800 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 10. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the
Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $31,800 as of September 30, 2008.
Meadowbrook Properties II LP (Meadowbrook Lane Apartments) is a 50-unit property located in Americus, GA. The property operated below breakeven in 2009. Occupancy averaged 85% for the year; however, it has increased to 88% as of March 2010. As a result of poor operations, the accounts payable balance continues to be an issue. The investment general partner will continue to prompt the operating general partner to fund the payables as needed. The 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired in 2004 with respect to Meadowbrook Properties II. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
In April 2009, the investment general partner of Wichita West Housing Associates Two LP approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on October 30, 2009. The sales price for the property is $2,498,580, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,555,423 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $838,846. Of the total proceeds received, $15,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $823,846 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 10. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $823,846 as of December 31, 2009.
(Series 11). As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 17 properties at March 31, 2010, all of which were at 100% qualified occupancy.
For the tax years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the series, in total, generated $(275,277) and $748,621, respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors.
As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 11 was $0. Investments in Operating Partnerships were affected by the way the Partnership accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Partnership adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership’s results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.
For the years ended March 31, 2010, and 2009, the net income(loss) for series 11 was $699,882 and $(984,245), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Partnership’s share of income from Operating Partnership, impairment losses, and the partnership management fee.
In April 2008, the investment general partner of Aspen Square Limited Partnership approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on March 24, 2010. The sales price for the property was $2,160,915,
which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,759,906 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partners of $398,848. Of the total proceeds received, $5,764 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $15,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $378,084 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 11. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $378,084 as of March 31, 2010.
In April 2008, the investment general partner of Copper Creek approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on December 18, 2008. The sales price for the property was $1,327,613, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,133,710 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partners of $193,709. Of the total proceeds received, $9,880 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $16,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $167,829 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 11. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $167,829 as of December 31, 2008.
April 2008, the investment general partner of Sierra Springs Limited Partnership approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on December 18, 2008. The sales price for the property was $1,354,584, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,135,034 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partners of $219,320. Of the total proceeds received, $9,120 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $16,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $194,200 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 11. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero.
Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $194,200 as of December 31, 2008.
In December 2009, the operating general partner of Coronado Housing entered into an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on February 10, 2010. The sales price of the property was $760,000, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $0 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $468,251. Of the total proceeds received, $15,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $15,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $438,251 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 11. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $438,251 as of March 31, 2010.
South Fork Heights, Limited (South Fork Heights Apartments), located in South Fork, Colorado is a 48-unit family property financed by Rural Development. The property has historically suffered from low occupancy and high turnover. Due to its location in a small tourist town in the mountains, there are minimal employment opportunities. However, in 2008, the development of a golf course, single family homes and condos at a nearby ski resort began to positively impact the area and property. In 2009 occupancy increased throughout the year and averaged 91%. The property operated above breakeven in 2009. In 2010, the occupancy for the first quarter 2010 decreased, averaging 83%. A new management company was hired in November 2009 and implemented stricter tenant selection criteria and began evictions for non-payment of rent. Management is hopeful that the occupancy will increase throughout the year. The tax, insurance, and mortgage payments are all current. The property delivered tax credits from 1991 through 2001. On December 31, 2005, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to South Fork Heights, Limited.
In November 2008, the investment general partner of South Fork Heights, Limited approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction was anticipated to close in April 2010; however, the buyer was unable to consummate the sale and the agreement has expired.
In August 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in El Dorado Springs Estates LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $561,702 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $25,680. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $20,680 was returned to cash reserves held by Series 11. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the
investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $20,680 as of September 30, 2008.
In August 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Nevada Manor, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $626,534 and anticipated cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $25,680. The transaction closed in September 2008. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $20,680 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 11. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $20,680 as of September 30, 2008.
In January 2009, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Holland Senior LP to a non-affiliated entity for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $868,190 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $26,098. Of the total proceeds received, $750 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $5,104 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $20,244 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 11. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $20,244 as of March 31, 2009.
In January 2009, the investment general partner of Hilltop Apartments LP approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on December 31, 2009. The sales price for the property was $1,456,512, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,356,512 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partners of $92,620. Of the total proceeds received, $14,025 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $16,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $62,595 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 11. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding
obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. The sale proceeds were received on January 4, 2010; a receivable in the amount of $62,595 has been recorded for Series 11 as of December 31, 2009. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $62,595 as of December 31, 2009.
In February 2010, the operating general partner of Crestwood RRH, Limited approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction is scheduled to close in December 2010. The anticipated sales price for the property is $5,070,000, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,763,835 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $1,468,855. Of the total proceeds estimated to be received, $90,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, it is expected that $22,500 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $1,356,355 are anticipated to be returned to cash reserves held by Series 11. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution.
(Series 12). As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 26 properties at March 31, 2010, all of which were at 100% qualified occupancy.
For the tax years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the series, in total, generated $(474,810) and $689,105, respectively, in passive tax income (losses) that were passed through to the investors.
As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 12 was $0. Investments in Operating Partnerships was affected by the way the Partnership accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Partnership adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership’s results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.
For the years ended March 31, 2010, and 2009, the net income(loss) for series 12 was $(174,134) and $432,175, respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund’s share of income from Operating Partnership, impairment losses, and the fund management fee.
Turner Lane, LP (660 Turner Apartments) is a 24-unit property located in Ashburn, GA. In 2008, the property operated below breakeven for the year. The reasons for the deficit are low occupancy and insufficient rental revenue. Occupancy averaged 84% in 2008 and has increased to 87% through 2009. Occupancy ended the year at 96% with operations above breakeven status. All real estate taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current. On December 31, 2005, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Turner Lane Limited Partnership. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
In April 2008, the investment general partner of Cananche Creek, Limited Partnership approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on December 18, 2008. The sales price for the property was $1,709,466, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,195,300 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partners of $513,642. Of the total proceeds received, $7,840 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $16,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $489,802 was returned to cash reserves held by Series 12. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $489,802 as of December 31, 2008.
During April 2008, the investment general partner of Shawnee Ridge, L.P. approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on December 18, 2008. The sales price for the property was $797,654, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $644,036 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partners of $153,454. Of the total proceeds received, $6,280 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $16,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $131,174 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 12. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $131,174 as of December 31, 2008.
Lakeridge Apartments of Eufala, Ltd. (Lakeridge Apts.) is a 30-unit development located in Eufala, AL. The property is located in a rural area with a stagnant economy. The property had suffered from low occupancy through 2006 but began rebounding in early 2007 with a reissuance of Section 8 vouchers and aggressive marketing. The 2009 audited financial statement confirms operations remain well above breakeven and occupancy was 100% for the first quarter of 2010. The operating general partner’s guarantee expired in 2001; however, they have continued to fund deficits as needed. All insurance, real estate tax and mortgage payments are current. On December 31, 2005, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Lakeridge Apartments of Eufala, Ltd. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
Fort Smith Housing Associates (Yorkshire Townhomes) is a 50-unit property located in Fort Smith, AR. The property has historically dealt with low occupancy, high operating expenses and an inconsistent management presence.
The management company has been replaced twice and turnover at the site manager position has been problematic. In January 2009, a full time site manager was hired but, by that time, the property had seen an increase in crime and the quality of the tenant profile had declined. In an effort to gain better control over the site, management moved a police officer into the manager’s unit. As a result, incidents at the property have been minimal and problematic tenants have either been evicted or moved out on their own accord. That combination has increased vacancy but the goal is to fill vacant units with stronger tenants. The permanent mortgage matured in February 2009 and was extended for a period of 6 months. The extension matured in September 2009 and was subsequently extended for another 12 months. At the end of the first quarter of 2010, occupancy was 64% with below breakeven operations. On December 31, 2008, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Fort Smith Housing Associates. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership. The mortgage, real estate tax and insurance payments are all current.
Prairie West Apts LP (Prairie West Apts.) is a 24-unit property located in West Fargo, North Dakota. In 2009, average occupancy was 92% and the property continued to operate below breakeven due to high operating expenses. The high operating expenses were mainly maintenance expenses due to increased turnover costs as well as required building maintenance for the aging property. Historically, management at this property has coordinated with Lutheran Social Services (LSS) to provide housing to new Americans despite no rental or credit history. As a result, the property was negatively affected by unique cultural concerns. At year-end 2008, management discontinued providing housing for LSS referrals without an established rental and credit history. In addition, leases of problematic tenants were not renewed in an effort to re-tenant the property and improve the community perception. As of March 31, 2010, occupancy was 96% and the property was operating above breakeven. The operating general partner continues to fund all operating deficits as operations are supported by an unlimited guarantee. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expired in 2005. The investment general partner has been in discussions regarding potential disposition options. The investment general partner will continue monitoring operations as well as continue to explore disposition options. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes, and insurance are current.
Hamilton Village LP (Hamilton Village Apartments) is a 20-unit family development located in Preston, GA. In 2008, occupancy averaged 99% and operations were above breakeven for the year. Through the fourth quarter of 2009, occupancy has averaged 99% and at December 31, 2009 was at 100% with above breakeven operations. On December 31, 2007, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Hamilton Village Limited Partnership. All mortgage, real estate tax and insurance payments are current. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
Briarwick Apartments Limited, A KY Limited Partnership (Briarwick Apartments) is a 40-unit family property located in Nicholasville, KY. In 2008, the Operating Partnership operated at a deficit due to maintaining an average occupancy of 59%. In 2009, the property operated below breakeven and had a cash flow deficit of ($45,653) with required replacement reserves. The reason for the cash flow deficit is mainly a result of very low occupancy which averaged 76% for the year (a significant improvement from 2008). Management continues to update units as vacancies occur and funds are available. Low occupancy has plagued this Operating Partnership for several years. This is the result of the property’s advanced age, which has made it non-competitive in the local rental market. According to the operating general partner,
management continues to advertise in local newspapers and offer concessions in order to attract residents. However, management continues to lose residents to newer developments offering more space and superior amenity packages. Rents at the property are comparable to other properties in the area. The mortgage, real estate tax and insurance payments are current. The operating general partner’s obligation to fund deficits is limited to $50,840 per year. On December 31, 2006, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
Los Caballos II Limited Partnership (Los Caballos II Apartments) was a 24-unit, family complex located in Hatch, New Mexico. On August 14, 2006, flash floods caused significant damage to the property. The county building inspector determined the property was a complete loss. On January 10, 2007, the operating general partner had a meeting with the Village of Hatch, representatives from Federal Emergency Management Agency, and Rural Development (RD). It was determined that the property would be demolished and would not be rebuilt by the existing Operating Partnership. Demolition was completed in June 2007. The existing mortgage, on which Rural Development had already agreed to suspend all payments until the property was reconstructed, will be assumed by a new Operating Partnership. The existing liability will subsequently be removed from Los Caballos II Limited Partnership. For tax purposes, this event will not be classified as an early extinguishment of debt.
The parcel held by the Los Caballos II partnership will not be the location of the newly constructed project. The new project will be on an adjacent property outside of the flood zone. The plan is to have a new Operating Partnership absorb the mortgage debt from Los Caballos II. The investment general partner has requested that RD approve a ‘Transfer of Assets’ that will move all debt and cash assets of Los Caballos II to a separate entity, but Los Caballos II will retain the land. If RD accepts this transfer, it will effectively reduce the Operating Partnership’s total debt from approximately $60,000 to $0, and will leave the land in the name of the Los Caballos II partnership.
The property was sold on December 15, 2009 without the approval or knowledge of the investment general partner. The debt, land, rental assistance and insurance proceeds were all sold to a new entity that is re-syndicating the property at another location. The investment general partner is in the process of resolving the outstanding legal issues with the operating general partner.
In August 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Portales Estates LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,395,236 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $47,080. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $42,080 was returned to cash reserves held by Series 12. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the
Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $42,080 as of September 30, 2008.
In July 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Burkesville Properties to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $712,364 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $27,600. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $22,600 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 12. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $22,600 as of September 30, 2008.
In July 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Clarkson Properties, Ltd. to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $714,796 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $27,600. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $22,600 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 12. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $22,600 as of September 30, 2008.
In July 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Evanwood Properties, Ltd. to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $727,412 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $27,600. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $22,600 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 12. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the
investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $22,600 as of September 30, 2008.
In January 2009, the investment general partner of RPI LP #22 approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction was anticipated to close in April 2010 but the closing was extended to July 2010. The anticipated sales price for the property is $1,250,000, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $559,772 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partners of $335,364. Of the total proceeds anticipated to be received, $1,500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, it is anticipated that $15,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $318,864 are anticipated to be returned to cash reserves held by Series 12. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution.
In February 2009, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Waynesboro Associates Limited, LP to a non-affiliated entity for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,322,785 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $39,684. Of the total proceeds received, $25,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,550 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $7,134 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 12. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $7,134 as of March 31, 2009.
(Series 14). As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%, respectively. The series had a total of 53 properties at March 31, 2010, all of which were at 100% qualified occupancy.
For the tax years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the series, in total, generated $1,137,043 and $(71,839), respectively, in passive tax income(losses) that were passed through to the investors.
As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Investments in Operating Partnerships for Series 14 was $0. Investments in Operating Partnerships were affected by the way the Partnership accounts for such investments, the equity method. By using the equity method the Partnership adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership’s results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued.
For the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the net income(loss) for series 14 was $1,211,018 and ($114,824), respectively. The major components of these amounts are the Fund’s share of income from Operating Partnership, impairment losses, and the fund management fee.
Beckwood Manor Six (Cedar View Apartments) is a 32-unit senior complex located in Brinkley, Arkansas. The Operating Partnership receives the majority of its rental income from a Section 521 rental assistance agreement with Rural Development for 26 units. As a senior property, nearly all residents receive only social security income. Occupancy in 2009 averaged 83%, dropping to 80% in the first quarter of 2010. The issue lies in renting the six units without rental assistance. Rents have been reduced in these units and management is aggressively working on increasing occupancy. Weekly ads are being run in local and surrounding area newspapers, and fliers have been distributed across town. Management plans to distribute fliers in neighboring towns in hopes of attracting more prospects. In 2009, the property operated below breakeven due to high operating expenses. These included high advertising costs due to vacancies, an increase in property taxes, utility increases including water and sewer rate increases, and training expenses for additional staff. The first quarter of 2010 financials indicate reduced administration, maintenance, and utility expenses in comparison to the prior year audit and current budget. Operations appear to have improved, and the property is operating slightly above breakeven taking real estate taxes, property insurance, mortgage payments, and reserve deposits into consideration. All mortgage payments and payables are current.
Cottonwood Apartments II, A Limited Partnership (Cottonwood Apartments II) is a 24-unit development located in Cottonport, Louisiana. In the third and fourth quarters of 2008, occupancy fell to 50% and 29%, respectively due to damages sustained during Hurricane Gustav. There was roof damage on all four buildings as well as interior damage to approximately fifteen units. In addition, the office and laundry room experienced some flooding. An insurance claim was submitted and proceeds of $414,250 were received. In addition, a total of $18,000 has been received for lost rents. All repairs were completed as of August 2009 at which time all units were back on line. Occupancy averaged 29% in 2009 and the property operated below breakeven. As of April 20, 2010, the property is 58% occupied. According to the operating general partner, low vacancy is due to the poor local economy, and a lack of jobs and qualified applicants. A site visit was conducted in March 2010 which confirmed that the low occupancy is in fact a market issue as there is little to no industry/commerce in the area. The operating general partner maintains that they are working closely with the on-site manager to market the property to the best of their ability. They are reaching out to local businesses, the community, and the Chamber of Commerce in an effort to increase occupancy with the use of fliers and by offering rental concessions. Management decreased rent in the first quarter in an effort to increase occupancy. On December 31, 2005, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Cottonwood Apartments II, A Limited Partnership. The investment limited partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
In December 2006, the investment general partner of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II — Series 14, Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III — Series 17 and Series 20 transferred 33% of their interest in College Greene Rental Associates Limited Partnership to entities affiliated with the operating general partners for their assumption of one third of the outstanding mortgage balance. The cash proceeds received by Series 14, Series 17, and Series 20 were $25,740, $7,919, and $65,341, respectively. Of the proceeds received, $1,950, $599, and $4,951 for Series 14, Series 17, and Series 20, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds received by Series
14, Series 17, and Series 20 of $23,790, $7,320 and $60,390, respectively, were applied against the investment limited partners’ investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting. In April 2010, the investment limited partner transferred 49% of its interest for $262,209. Of the proceeds received, $5,200, $1,600 and $13,200 for Series 14, Series 17 and Series 20, respectively, will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer. The remaining proceeds of $62,974, $19,377 and $159,858, respectively, were returned to the cash reserves held by Series 14, Series 17 and Series 20, respectively. The proceeds were allocated to the investment limited partnerships based on their original equity investments in the Operating Partnership. The remaining investment limited partner interest is scheduled to be transferred in March 2011.
Rosewood Manor, Limited (Rosewood Manor Apartments) is a 43-unit apartment complex located in Ellenton, Florida. Improved occupancy allowed the property to operate above breakeven in 2009. In the first quarter of 2010 the property continued to operate above breakeven. As of March 31, 2010 the property was 98% occupied. To maintain high occupancy, the site manager is continuing to deliver fliers and brochures to all of the local restaurants, shopping malls and housing agencies on a weekly basis. Management was able to increase their project based rental assistance units from 10 to 19, which should further help to maintain strong occupancy. On December 31, 2006, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Rosewood Manor, Limited. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
Wynnewood Village Apartments, Ltd. (Wynnewood Village Apartments) is a 16-unit family property located in Wynnewood, OK. Wynnewood is a small town where population and employment opportunities have been consistently declining in recent years. Consequently, Wynnewood Village has struggled to maintain a stabilized occupancy and to keep operations above breakeven. Requests to Rural Development for additional rental assistance have been denied. The management company has expanded marketing activities to include advertisements in surrounding towns and outreach to local agencies for referrals. These efforts helped increase occupancy to 94% in December 2009; however, occupancy remains a major issue as it averaged only 84% for the year. A rent increase granted from Rural Development effective January 1, 2009 was implemented and greatly improved the property’s cash flow, but operations remained below breakeven in 2009. Insurance costs increased 45% in 2009 due to increased insurance claims made in both 2008 and 2009. The operating general partner is negotiating lower rates with another insurance company in order to decrease premiums in 2010. As of March 2010, the property was operating above breakeven and was 88% occupied. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as needed. All taxes, mortgage and insurance payments are current. On December 31, 2007, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the partnership.
Davis Village Apartments Limited, LP (Davis Village Apartments) is a 44-unit family property located in Davis, OK. The property operated below breakeven in 2008 due to low occupancy of 89% and insufficient rents. In 2008, the local area Rural Development had severely limited the items they would allow for use of the replacement reserve fund, forcing the property to pay for replacement items from operations. In 2009, marketing efforts were increased and occupancy improved to 94%. Management also successfully gained approval from Rural Development for a significant amount of reserve withdrawals, allowing the property to generate cash flow per the 2009 audit. Rural Development approved a $25-$30 rent increase on all units effective January 1, 2010 that is projected to further improve the property’s cash flow. However, occupancy has decreased to 86% as of March 2010, and the property is
operating below breakeven through the first quarter of 2010. The operating general partner continues to fund all operating deficits. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance payments are all current. On December 31, 2007, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the partnership.
In April 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Okemah Village Apartments, Limited Partnership to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $647,815 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $40,600. Of the total proceeds received, $15,600 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $17,500 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $17,500 as of June 30, 2008. In addition, equity outstanding for the Operating Partnership in the amount of $31,656 was recorded as gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership as of March 31, 2009.
McComb Family LP (Pine Ridge Apartments) is a 32-unit development located in McComb, Mississippi. This property is located in a remote location. In 2008, occupancy improved to average 92% for the year and operations improved to above breakeven status. In 2009, occupancy continues to improve, averaging 95% for the year, with operations above breakeven status. The property’s cash situation has improved as a result of increased occupancy and rental assistance which was awarded, and made effective in September 2008. In addition, the lender has granted the property a workout plan; specifically, a temporary deferment of the monthly debt service so that necessary improvements can be made. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as needed in accordance with the operating deficit guarantee, which is unlimited in time and amount. All real estate tax, insurance and mortgage payments are current. On December 31, 2006, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
Jarratt Limited Partnership (Jarratt Village Apartments) is a 24-unit complex located in Jarratt, Virginia. Occupancy continued to improve throughout 2008 and 2009, averaging 96% in both years, with above breakeven operations. As of March 31, 2010, the property was fully occupied and operations remain above breakeven. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as needed, despite an expired guarantee. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current. On December 31, 2006, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired with respect to Jarratt Limited Partnership. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
Duncan Village Apartments Limited, LP (Duncan Village Apartments) is a 48-unit family property located in Duncan, OK. Occupancy was 96% as of December
2009 and averaged 95% for the year. Despite strong occupancy, operations were projected to be below breakeven for the year due to fencing and concrete repairs totaling $12,711 and $4,950, respectively. The operating general partner informed the investment limited partner that those costs had not been reimbursed from the replacement reserve account due to Rural Development restrictions. The 2009 audit confirmed that withdrawals had indeed been made for those items, and as a result, the property operated above breakeven for the year. Rural Development approved a $25 rent increase on all units effective January 1, 2010 that is projected to maintain above breakeven operations in 2010. The property was 94% occupied as of March 31, 2010. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance payments are all current. On December 31, 2007, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the partnership.
Prague Village Apartments Limited, LP (Prague Village Apartments) is an 8-unit family property located in Prague, OK. Occupancy was 100% as of December 2009 and averaged 94% for the year. Despite strong occupancy, operations were below breakeven for the year due to increased replacements and insurance costs. The majority of replacement costs have not been reimbursed from the replacement reserve account due to Rural Development restrictions. Insurance costs increased 45% in 2009 due to increased insurance claims made in both 2008 and 2009. The operating general partner is negotiating lower rates with another insurance company in order to decrease premiums in 2010. Rural Development approved a $45-55 rent increase on all units effective January 1, 2010 that is projected to bring operations back above breakeven in 2010. The property operated above breakeven and was fully occupied as of March 31, 2010. The operating general partner continues to fund all operating deficits. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance payments are all current. On December 31, 2007, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the partnership.
Scott Partners, LP (Lafayette Gardens) is a 56-unit apartment complex located in Scott, Louisiana. In 2009, the property operated below breakeven due to a decrease in occupancy and an increase in operating expenses. The property manager increased occupancy to 94% by the end of December 2009. During the first quarter of 2010, low occupancy, high bad debt, and high maintenance expenses continued and as a result the property operated below breakeven. Management focused on collection efforts and worked diligently to reduce bad debt. As a result, by the end of the first quarter, bad debt was no longer an issue. Occupancy ended the first quarter at 89%. According to management, traffic to the site remained consistent during the first quarter. However, most of the prospective residents did not meet the income requirements of the property. Management maintains its marketing and outreach efforts and occupancy increased to the mid-90s subsequent to the first quarter. The increase in maintenance expenses is the result of turnover costs incurred to make units rent ready. The operating deficit guarantee is unlimited in time and amount. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current. On December 31, 2005 the Low Income Housing Tax Credit compliance period ended. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
In December 2007, the investment general partner transferred 50% of the investment partnership interest in Portville Square Apartments LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of half the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $425,921 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $0. The remaining 50% investment limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership was
transferred in December 2008 for the assumption of the remaining mortgage balance outstanding and proceeds of $0. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment limited partnership entered into an agreement with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the residual agreement, if the property owned by the Operating Partnership is refinanced or sold, on or before December 18, 2013, there would be a residual payment of the capital transaction proceeds distributable to the investment limited partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partnership transferred its interest. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partner’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
In November 2009, the operating general partner of Carleton Court entered into an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on December 23, 2009. The sales price of the property was $2,342,012, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,342,011 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $0. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
In December 2007, the investment general partner transferred 50% of the investment partnership interest in Belmont Village Court to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of half the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $450,438 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $0. The remaining 50% investment limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership was transferred in December 2008 for the assumption of the remaining mortgage balance outstanding and proceeds of $0. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment limited partnership entered into an agreement with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the residual agreement, if the property owned by the Operating Partnership is refinanced or sold, on or before December 18, 2013, there would be a residual payment of the capital transaction proceeds distributable to the investment limited partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partnership transferred its interest. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partner’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
In December 2007, the investment general partner transferred 50% of the investment partnership interest in Harrison City Associates, a Limited Partnership to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of half the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $716,719 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $0. The remaining 50% investment limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership was transferred in December 2008 for the assumption of the remaining mortgage balance outstanding and proceeds of $0. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment limited partnership entered into an agreement with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the residual agreement if the property owned by the Operating Partnership is refinanced or sold, on or before December 18, 2013, there would be a residual payment of the capital
transaction proceeds distributable to the investment limited partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partnership transferred its interest. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partner’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
In December 2007, the investment general partner transferred 50% of the investment partnership interest in Tionesta Manor, a Limited Partnership to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of half the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $690,817 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $0. The remaining 50% investment limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership was transferred in December 2008 for the assumption of the remaining mortgage balance outstanding and proceeds of $0. In addition, the investment general partner on behalf of the investment limited partnership entered into an agreement with the Operating Partnership for receipt of a residual payment. Under the terms of the residual agreement, if the property owned by the Operating Partnership is refinanced or sold, on or before December 18, 2013, there would be a residual payment of the capital transaction proceeds distributable to the investment limited partnership in accordance with the Operating Partnership Agreement in effect at the date the investment limited partnership transferred its interest. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partner’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
In January 2008, the investment general partner of Navapai Associates approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on November 24, 2008. The sales price for the property was $982,030, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $852,030 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $101,427. Of the total proceeds received, $9,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $92,427 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $92,427 as of December 31, 2008.
In January 2008, the investment general partner of Chaparral Associates approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on November 24, 2008. The sales price for the property was $772,020, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $672,020 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $113,807. Of the total proceeds received, $9,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $104,807 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the
investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $104,807 as of December 31, 2008.
In August 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Excelsior Springs Properties LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $603,539 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $25,680. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $20,680 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $20,680 as of September 30, 2008.
In August 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Smithville Properties, LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,205,936 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $51,360. Of the total proceeds received, $5,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $46,360 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $46,360 as of September 30, 2008.
In May 2008, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in San Jacinto Investors II to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,295,150 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $250,000. The transaction closed on January 1, 2010. Of the total proceeds received, $3,102 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $15,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party
legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $231,898 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, will be recorded in the amount of $231,898 as of March 31, 2010.
In July 2008, the investment general partner of Capital Housing Associates approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on October 31, 2008. The sales price for the property was $1,887,961, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,121,367 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partners of $450,000. Of the total proceeds received, $15,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $435,000 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $435,000 as of December 31, 2008. On March 26, 2009, additional sale proceeds of $34,470 were received. The additional sale proceeds were returned to the cash reserves held by Series 14 and an additional gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership has been recorded for amount received.
In October 2008, the investment general partner of Breckenridge Apartments approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed in September 2009. The sales price for the property was $901,201, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $831,201 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partners of $48,154. Of the total proceeds received, $15,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $33,154 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, has been recorded in the amount of $33,154 as of September 30, 2009. The sale of the Operating Partnership has been recognized as of September 30, 2009, but the sale proceeds were received in October 2009.
In October 2008, the investment general partner of Sioux Falls Housing Associates Two LP approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on January 29, 2009. The sales price for the property was $1,718,820, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $776,311 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partners of $641,318. Of the total proceeds received, $15,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $626,318 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to $14,596. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $611,722 as of March 31, 2009. In August 2009, additional sale proceeds of $25,549 were received and returned to the cash reserves held by Series 14.
In January 2009, the investment general partner of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund I - Series 3 and Series 14, respectively, entered into an agreement to transfer its interests in Lakewood Terrace Limited Partnership to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,974,769 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partnerships of $100. Of the total proceeds received, $44 from Series 3 and $56 from Series 14, respectively, was returned to cash reserves held by Series 3 and Series 14, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a $44 and $56 gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership for Series 3 and Series 14, respectively, has been recorded as of February 28, 2009.
Rainier Manor Associates (Rainier Manor Apartments) is a 104-unit family development located in Mount Rainier, MD. The property was constructed in 1993. At the time of construction, the general contractor installed the waterproofing system for the buildings improperly. As a result of the improper installation and subsequent slow leaks, the operating general partner recently became aware of severe structural deficiencies at the property. Two units are currently out of service, but there have been no reports of mold growth. An engineering report was conducted and estimated costs of repair are $1,300,000. The operating general partner has indicated an intention to refinance the debt and take out sufficient capital in order to make the necessary repairs. As there is a lockout period on the prepayment of the debt, the operating general partner is in negotiations with the lender to allow for early prepayment. To help expedite the negotiations, the operating general partner has not made the December or January mortgage payments, hoping to work out the issue and reduce the pre-payment penalty. The investment general partner is awaiting a response from the lender and will coordinate with the operating general partner to explore all disposition options. The property operated below breakeven in 2008 with 91% average
occupancy. As of December 2009, occupancy was 82% and operations returned to above breakeven status. The Operating Partnership’s 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2007. The investment general partner will continue to explore various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
In February 2010, the operating general partner of Rainer Manor Associates LP approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction is scheduled to close in July 2010. The anticipated sales price for the property is $3,300,000, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $3,293,443 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $0. There are no proceeds from the sale anticipated to be returned to cash reserves held by Series 14 and Series 15, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution.
In October 2009, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Derby Housing Associates to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,049,178 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $720,000. Of the total proceeds received, $7,600 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $712,400 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, was recorded in the amount of $712,400 as of December 31, 2009.
Colorado City Seniors (Colorado City Seniors Apartments) Ltd is a 24-unit elderly development located in Colorado City, Texas. Occupancy averaged 93% in 2009 and the property operated above breakeven for the year. There was a large increase in maintenance costs of approximately $12,000 in 2009 due to several windstorms over the course of the year. Over the first quarter of 2010, operating expenses have corrected back to historic levels and the property continues to operate above breakeven. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
Hughes Springs Seniors (Hughes Springs Seniors Apartments) is a 32-unit elderly development located in Hughes Springs, TX. The property performed well in 2008 with average occupancy of 93%. Average occupancy for 2009 was 90% and the property operated below breakeven for the year. The below breakeven performance was due to an increase in operating expenses, specifically maintenance. According to the operating general partner, there was a major water leak on site in addition to tree removal and sinkhole repair costs. In 2010, occupancy has averaged 91% through the first quarter and the property is now operating above breakeven. Expenses have corrected back to normal levels. The Operating Partnership’s 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period expired on December 31, 2005. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
In December 2009, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Amherst Limited Partnership to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,509,804 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $50,000. Of the total proceeds received, $500 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $10,000 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $39,500 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, was recorded in the amount of $39,500 as of December 31, 2009.
In December 2009, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Four Oaks Village LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $855,453 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $93,940. Of the total proceeds received, $5,075 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership; $10,050 represents a credit recovery loan due to the investment limited partner and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $81,365 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, was recorded in the amount of $81,365 as of December 31, 2009.
In December 2009, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Hillmont Village LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $845,720 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $93,989. Of the total proceeds received, $4,380 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership; $11,352 represents a credit recovery loan due to the investment limited partner and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $82,109 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses
generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, was recorded in the amount of $82,109 as of December 31, 2009.
In December 2009, the investment general partner transferred its interest in Oakland Village LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $816,708 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $118,126. Of the total proceeds received, $1,062 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $109,564 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, was recorded in the amount of $109,564 as of December 31, 2009.
In December 2009 the investment general partner transferred its interest in Stanardsville Village LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $559,928 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $17,000. Of the total proceeds received, $6,795 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $7,500 was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $2,705 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, was recorded in the amount of $2,705 as of December 31, 2009.
In December 2009, the operating general partner of Village Terrace Limited Partnership entered into an agreement to sell the property and the transaction closed on January 8, 2010. The sales price of the property was $1,185,000, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $568,565 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $334,852. Of the total proceeds received, $112,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, $15,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $207,852 was returned to cash reserves
held by Series 14. In February 2010, additional sale proceeds of $3,056 were received and returned to the cash reserves held by Series 14. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment partnership’s investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership of the proceeds from the sale, net of the overhead and expenses, was recorded in the amount of $210,908 as of March 31, 2010.
Topsham Housing Associates (Greenleaf Apartments) is a 21 unit apartment complex located in Bowdoinham, ME. In 2009, the property operated above breakeven. However, the Operating Partnership was flagged with a going concern opinion as a result of a tax lien filed by the county for delinquent taxes. The operating general partner has advised that the delinquent taxes will be paid in the second quarter and the tax lien will be cleared. The investment general partner will continue discussions with the operating general partner to monitor this issue. Through the first quarter of 2010, the property continued to operate above breakeven. As of March 31, 2010 the property was 90% occupied. The property is current on mortgage and insurance.
Wesley Village Associates is a 36-unit apartment complex located in Martinsburg, West Virginia. In 2009, the property operated below breakeven due to increased administrative and maintenance expenses. Management discovered that the maintenance personnel had indicated work was completed when it was still outstanding. As a result, in the first quarter of 2010, management inspected all units at the property and found additional units in need of extensive repair. The property continued to operate below breakeven in the first quarter due to high deferred maintenance expenses. In February 2010, management hired two additional maintenance staff members to correct the deficiencies. The additional maintenance payroll expense will temporarily cause an increase to administrative expenses but management will return to normal staffing once all deferred items have been corrected. As of March 31,2010 the property was 100% occupied. The operating general partner continues to advance funds and accrue affiliated management company fees to fund operating deficits. All taxes, insurance, and mortgage payments are current. On December 31, 2005 the Low Income Housing Tax Credit compliance period ended. The investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
Principal Accounting Policies and Estimates
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), which require the Partnership to make various estimates and assumptions. The following section is a summary of some aspects of those accounting policies that may require subjective or complex judgments and are most important to the portrayal of the Partnership’s financial condition and results of operations. The Partnership believes that there is a low probability that the use of different estimates or assumptions in making these judgments would result in materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements.
The Partnership is required to assess potential impairments to its long-lived assets, which are primarily investments in limited partnerships. The Partnership accounts for its investment in limited partnerships in accordance with the equity method of accounting since the Partnership does not control the operations of the Operating Partnerships. The purpose of an impairment analysis is to verify that the real estate investment balance reflected on the balance sheet does not exceed the value of the underlying investments.
If the book value of the Partnership’s investment in an Operating Partnership exceeds the estimated value derived by management, which generally consists of the remaining future Low-Income Housing Credits allocable to the Partnership and the estimated residual value to the Partnership, the Partnership reduces its investment in the Operating Partnership and includes this reduction in equity in loss of investment of limited partnerships.
GAAP provides guidance on when a company should include the assets, liabilities, and activities of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) in its financial statements and when it should disclose information about its relationship with a VIE. A VIE is a legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets, which must be consolidated by a company if it is the primary beneficiary because it absorbs the majority of the entity’s expected losses, the majority of the expected returns, or both.
Based on this guidance, the Operating Partnerships in which the Partnership invests meet the definition of a VIE. However, management does not consolidate the Partnership’s interests in these VIEs under this guidance, as it is not considered to be the primary beneficiary. The Partnership currently records the amount of its investment in these partnerships as an asset on its balance sheet, recognizes its share of partnership income or losses in the statements of operations, and discloses how it accounts for material types of these investments in its financial statements.
The Partnership’s balance in investment in Operating Partnerships, plus the risk of recapture of tax credits previously recognized on these investments, represents its maximum exposure to loss. The Partnership’s exposure to loss on these partnerships is mitigated by the condition and financial performance of the underlying properties as well as the strength of the local general partners and their guarantee against credit recapture.
Recent Accounting Changes
In June 2006, accounting guidance for Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of the accounting guidance for Accounting for Income Taxes, was issued. This requires all taxpayers to analyze all material positions they have taken or plan to take in all tax returns that have been filed or should have been filed with all taxing authorities for all years still subject to challenge by those taxing authorities. The Partnership has elected to be treated as a pass-through entity for income tax purposes and, as such, is not subject to income taxes. Rather, all items of taxable income, deductions and tax credits are passed through to and are reported by its owners on their respective income tax returns. The Partnership’s federal tax status as a pass-through entity is based on its legal status as a Partnership. Accordingly, the Partnership is not required to take any tax positions in order to qualify as a pass-through entity. The Partnership is required to file and does file tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service and other taxing authorities. Accordingly, these financial statements do not reflect a provision for income taxes and the Partnership has no other tax positions, which must be considered for disclosure.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued accounting guidance for Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and shall be applied prospectively except for very limited transactions. In February 2008, the FASB delayed for one year implementation of the guidance as it pertains to certain non-financial assets and liabilities. The Partnership adopted GAAP for Fair Value Measurements effective April 1, 2008, except as it applies to those non-financial assets and liabilities, for which the effective date was April 1, 2009. The Partnership has determined that adoption of this guidance has no material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued accounting guidance for The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This guidance permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The fair value election is designed to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. It is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. On April 1, 2008, the Partnership adopted GAAP for The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities and elected not to apply the provisions to its eligible financial assets and financial liabilities on the date of adoption. Accordingly, the initial application of the guidance had no effect on the Partnership.
In November 2008, the FASB issued accounting guidance on Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations that addresses how the initial carrying value of an equity method investment should be determined, how an impairment assessment of an underlying indefinite-lived intangible asset of an equity method investment should be performed, how an equity method investee’s issuance of shares should be accounted for, and how to account for a change in an investment from the equity method to the cost method. This guidance is effective in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Partnership adopted the guidance for the interim quarterly period beginning April 1, 2009. The impact of adopting it does not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial condition or results of operations.
Recent Accounting Changes - Continued
In April 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance for Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This requires disclosure about the method and significant assumptions used to establish the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods as well as annual statements. It became effective for American Affordable Housing II L.P. as of and for the interim period ended June 30, 2009 and has no impact on the Partnership’s financial condition or results of operations.
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance regarding subsequent events, which was subsequently updated in February 2010. This guidance established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this guidance sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This guidance was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, and was therefore adopted by the Partnership for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption did not have a significant impact on the subsequent events that the Partnership reports, either through recognition or disclosure, in the financial statements. In February 2010, the FASB amended its guidance on subsequent events to remove the requirement to disclose the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events, alleviating conflicts with current SEC guidance. This amendment was effective immediately and therefore the Partnership did not include the disclosure in this Form 10-K.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting and disclosure requirements for the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIEs). The amended guidance modifies the consolidation model to one based on control and economics, and replaces the current quantitative primary beneficiary analysis with a qualitative analysis. The primary beneficiary of a VIE will be the entity that has (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. If multiple unrelated parties share such power, as defined, no party will be required to consolidate the VIE. Further, the amended guidance requires continual reconsideration of the primary beneficiary of a VIE and adds an additional reconsideration event for determination of whether an entity is a VIE. Additionally, the amendment requires enhanced and expanded disclosures around VIEs. This amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2010 is not expected to have a material effect on the Partnership’s financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued the Accounting Standards Codification (Codification). Effective July 1, 2009, the Codification is the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The Codification is intended to reorganize, rather than change, existing GAAP. Accordingly, all references to currently existing GAAP have been removed and have been replaced with plain English explanations of the Partnership’s accounting policies. The adoption of the Codification did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial position or results of operations.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not Applicable |
|
|
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The financial statements of the Partnership are listed in Item 15 as being filed as a part of this Report as Exhibits 13 are incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
None. |
|
Controls & Procedures |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
|
|
|
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Partnership’s general partner, under the supervision and with the participation of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of C&M Management, Inc., carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Partnership’s “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based on that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Partnership required to be included in the Partnership’s periodic SEC filings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management of the Partnership is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Partnership’s internal control system over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Partnership’s management regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Due to inherent limitations, an internal control system over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Partnership’s general partner, under the supervision and with the participation of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Boston Capital Associates II LP, assessed the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal controls and procedures over financial reporting as of March 31, 2010. In making this assessment, the Partnership’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of March 31, 2010, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting was effective. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Fund to provide only management’s report in this annual report. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Changes in Internal Controls |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) |
The Partnership has no directors or executives officers of its own. The following biographical information is presented for the partners of the general partners and affiliates of those partners, including Boston Capital Partners, Inc. (“Boston Capital”), with principal responsibility for the Partnership’s affairs.
John P. Manning, age 61, is co-founder, and since 1974 has been the President and Chief Executive Officer, of Boston Capital Corporation. As co-founder and CEO of Boston Capital, Mr. Manning’s primary responsibilities include strategic planning, business development and the continued oversight of new opportunities. In addition to his responsibilities at Boston Capital Corporation, Mr. Manning is a proactive leader in the multifamily real estate industry. He served in 1990 as a member of the Mitchell-Danforth Task Force, which reviewed and suggested reforms to the Low Income Housing Tax Credit program. He was the founding President of the Affordable Housing Tax Credit Coalition and is a former member of the board of the National Leased Housing Association. During the 1980s, he served as a member of the Massachusetts Housing Policy Committee as an appointee of the Governor of Massachusetts. In addition, Mr. Manning has testified before the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee and the U.S. Senate Finance Committee on the critical role of the private sector in the success of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit. In 1996, President Clinton appointed him to the President’s Advisory Committee on the Arts at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. In 1998, President Clinton appointed Mr. Manning to the President’s Export Council, the premiere committee comprised of major corporate CEOs that advise the President on matters of foreign trade and commerce. In 2003, he was appointed by Boston Mayor Tom Menino to the Mayors Advisory Panel on Housing. Mr. Manning sits on the Board of Directors of the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library in Boston where he serves as Chairman of the Distinguished Visitors Program. He is also on the Board of Directors of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. Mr. Manning is a graduate of Boston College.
Mr. Manning is the managing member of Boston Associates. Mr. Manning is also the principal of Boston Capital Corporation. While Boston Capital is not a direct subsidiary of Boston Capital Corporation, each of the entities is under the common control of Mr. Manning.
Jeffrey H. Goldstein, age 48, is Chief Operating Officer and has been the Director of Real Estate of Boston Capital Corporation since 1996. He directs Boston Capital Corporation’s comprehensive real estate services, which include all aspects of origination, underwriting, due diligence and acquisition. As COO, Mr. Goldstein is responsible for the financial and operational areas of Boston Capital Corporation and assists in the design and implementation of business development and strategic planning objectives. Mr. Goldstein previously served as the Director of the Asset Management division as well as the head of the dispositions and troubled assets group. Utilizing his 16 years experience in the real estate syndication and development industry, Mr. Goldstein has been instrumental in the diversification and expansion of Boston Capital Corporation’s businesses. Prior to joining Boston
Capital Corporation in 1990, Mr. Goldstein was Manager of Finance for A.J. Lane & Co., where he was responsible for placing debt on all new construction projects and debt structure for existing apartment properties. Prior to that, he served as Manager for Homeowner Financial Services, a financial consulting firm for residential and commercial properties, and worked as an analyst responsible for budgeting and forecasting for the New York City Council Finance Division. He graduated from the University of Colorado and received his MBA from Northeastern University.
Kevin P. Costello, age 63, is Executive Vice President and has been the Director of Institutional Investing of Boston Capital Corporation since 1992 and serves on the firm’s Executive Committee. He is responsible for all corporate investment activity and has spent over 20 years in the real estate syndication and investment business. Mr. Costello’s prior responsibilities at Boston Capital Corporation have involved the management of the Acquisitions Department and the structuring and distribution of conventional and tax credit private placements. Prior to joining Boston Capital Corporation in 1987, he held positions with First Winthrop, Reynolds Securities and Bache & Company. Mr. Costello graduated from Stonehill College and received his MBA with honors from Rutgers’ Graduate School of Business Administration.
Marc N. Teal, age 46, has been Chief Financial Officer of Boston Capital Corporation since May 2003. Mr. Teal previously served as Senior Vice President and Director of Accounting and prior to that served as Vice President of Partnership Accounting. He has been with Boston Capital Corporation since 1990. In his current role as CFO he oversees all of the accounting, financial reporting, SEC reporting, budgeting, audit, tax and compliance for Boston Capital Corporation, its affiliated entities and all Boston Capital Corporation sponsored programs. Additionally, Mr. Teal is responsible for maintaining all banking and borrowing relationships of Boston Capital Corporation and treasury management of all working capital reserves. He also oversees Boston Capital Corporation’s information and technology areas, including the strategic strategic planning for Boston Capital Corporation and its affiliaties. Prior to joining Boston Capital Corporation in 1990, Mr. Teal was a Senior Accountant for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes, a multifaceted real estate company, and prior to that was a Senior Accountant for Liberty Real Estate Corp. He received a Bachelor of Science Accountancy from Bentley College and a Masters in Finance from Suffolk University.
|
(f) |
Involvement in certain legal proceedings. |
|
|
|
|
|
None. |
|
|
|
|
(g) |
Promoters and control persons. |
|
|
|
|
|
None. |
|
|
|
|
(h) and (i) |
The Partnership has no directors or executive officers and accordingly has no audit committee and no audit committee financial expert. The Partnership is not a listed issuer as defined in Regulation 10A-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
The General Partner of the Partnership, Boston Capital Associates LP, has adopted a Code of Ethics which applies to the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of C&M Management, Inc. The Code of Ethics will be provided without charge to any person who requests it. Such request should be directed to, Marc N. Teal Boston Capital Corp. One Boston Place Boston, MA 02108. |
|
|
|
|
Executive Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) |
The Partnership has no officers or directors and no compensation committee. However, under the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Partnership, the Partnership has paid or accrued obligations to the general partner and its affiliates for the following fees during the 2010 fiscal year:
1. An annual partnership management fee based on .5 percent of the aggregate cost of all apartment complexes acquired by the Operating Partnerships, less the amount of certain partnership management and reporting fees paid or payable by the Operating Partnerships, has been accrued as payable to Boston Capital Asset Management Limited Partnership. The annual partnership management fee accrued during the year ended March 31, 2010 was $1,119,566. The annual partnership management fee paid during the year ended March 31, 2010 was $3,030,000. Accrued fees are payable without interest as sufficient funds become available.
2. The Partnership has reimbursed or accrued to an affiliate of the general partner a total of $74,853 for amounts charged to operations during the year ended March 31, 2010. The reimbursement includes, but may not be limited to, postage, printing, travel, and overhead allocations.
3. The Partnership recorded as payable to affiliates of the general partner a total of $0 for amounts advanced to the Partnership to enable it to make advances to the Operating Partnerships. During the year ended March 31, 2010, $41,453 from Series 7, $99,461 from Series 11, and $172,658 from Series 14 were paid to an affiliate of the general partner. The remaining of $173,840 from Series 7 has been forgiven. The general partner has recorded this amount as a capital contribution.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
(a) Security ownership of certain beneficial owners.
As of March 31, 2010, 18,678,688 BACs had been issued. The following Series are known to have one investor with holdings in excess of 5% of the total outstanding BACs in the series.
1. Everest Housing
199 South Los Robles Ave., Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91101
|
Series |
|
% of BACs held |
|
|
Series 12 |
|
8.92 |
% |
|
Series 14 |
|
7.19 |
% |
(b) Security ownership of management.
The general partner has a 1% interest in all profits, losses, credits and distributions of the Partnership. The Partnership’s response to Item 12(a) is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Changes in control.
There exists no arrangement known to the Partnership the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Partnership. There is a provision in the Partnership’s Partnership Agreement which allows, under certain circumstances, the ability to change control.
The Partnership has no compensation plans under which interests in the Fund are authorized for issuance.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
(a) Transactions with related persons
The Partnership has no officers or directors. However, under the terms of the Offering, various kinds of compensation and fees are payable to the general partner and its affiliates during the organization and operation of the Partnership. Additionally, the general partner will receive distributions from the Partnership if there is cash available for distribution or residual proceeds as defined in the Partnership Agreement. The amounts and kinds of compensation and fees are described in the Prospectus under the caption “Compensation and Fees”, which is incorporated herein by reference. See Note B of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for amounts accrued or paid to the general partner and its affiliates during the period from April 1, 1995 through March 31, 2010.
(b) Review, Approval or Ratification of transactions with related persons.
The Partnership response to Item 13(a) is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Promoters and certain control persons.
Not applicable.
(d) Independence.
The Partnership has no directors.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Fees paid to the Partnership’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2010 were comprised of the following:
|
Fee |
|
Ser. 7 |
|
Ser. 9 |
|
Ser.10 |
|
Ser.11 |
|
Ser.12 |
|
Ser.14 |
|
||||||
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
6,816 |
|
$ |
18,026 |
|
$ |
14,526 |
|
$ |
15,576 |
|
$ |
18,376 |
|
$ |
33,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Audit Related Fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
250 |
|
500 |
|
— |
|
1,000 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Tax Fees |
|
2,955 |
|
8,655 |
|
6,945 |
|
7,325 |
|
8,655 |
|
16,635 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
All Other Fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,771 |
|
$ |
26,681 |
|
$ |
21,721 |
|
$ |
23,401 |
|
$ |
27,031 |
|
$ |
50,713 |
|
Fees paid to the Partnership’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2009 were comprised of the following:
|
Fee |
|
Ser. 7 |
|
Ser. 9 |
|
Ser.10 |
|
Ser.11 |
|
Ser.12 |
|
Ser.14 |
|
||||||
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
11,133 |
|
$ |
23,163 |
|
$ |
21,543 |
|
$ |
22,083 |
|
$ |
25,483 |
|
$ |
47,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Audit Related Fees |
|
— |
|
— |
|
250 |
|
500 |
|
— |
|
1,000 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Tax Fees |
|
3,936 |
|
10,965 |
|
9,599 |
|
9,818 |
|
11,382 |
|
21,097 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
All Other Fees |
|
600 |
|
600 |
|
600 |
|
2,100 |
|
2,600 |
|
600 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,669 |
|
$ |
34,728 |
|
$ |
31,992 |
|
$ |
34,501 |
|
$ |
39,465 |
|
$ |
69,700 |
|
Audit Committee
The Partnership has no Audit Committee. All audit services and any permitted non-audit services performed by the Partnership’s independent auditors are pre-approved by C&M Management, Inc.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
|||
|
|
|
||
|
(a) 1. |
Financial Statements - Filed herein as Exhibit 13 |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Balance Sheets, March 31, 2010 and 2009 |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Statement of Operations, Years ended March 31, 2010, and 2009 |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital, Years ended March 31, 2010, and 2009 |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows, Years ended March 31, 2010, and 2009 |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements, March 31, 2010, and 2009 |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(a) 2. |
Financial Statement Schedules |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Schedules not listed are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the information is included in the financial statements or the notes hereto. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(b) |
1.Exhibits (listed according to the number assigned in the table in Item 601 of Regulation S-K) |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Exhibit No. 3 - Organization Documents. |
|
|
|
|
a. |
Certificate of Limited Partnership of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3 to the Partnership’s Registration Statement No. 33-30145 on Form S-11 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 1989.) |
|
|
|
Exhibit No. 4 - Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Agreement of Limited Partnership of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 to the Partnership’s Registration Statement No. 33-30145 on Form S-11 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 1989.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. 10 - Material contracts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Beneficial Assignee Certificate. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10A to the Partnership’s Registration Statement No. 33-30145 on Form S-11 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 1989.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. 13 - Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Financial Statement of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership, filed herein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. 23 - Consents of experts and counsel. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Independent Auditor’s Reports for Operating Partnerships, filed herein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. 31 Certification 302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. 32 Certification 906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herein |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Partnership has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II Limited Partnership |
|
|
|
By: |
Boston Capital Associates II L.P. |
|
|
|
General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
BCA Associates Limited Partnership, |
|
|
|
General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
C&M Management Inc., |
|
Date: |
|
General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ John P. Manning |
|
|
|
John P. Manning |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Partnership and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
|
DATE: |
|
SIGNATURE: |
|
TITLE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2010 |
|
/s/ John P. Manning |
|
Director, President (Principal Executive Officer) C&M Management Inc.; Director, President (Principal Executive Officer) BCTC II Assignor Corp. |
|
|
|
John P. Manning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 29, 2010 |
|
/s/ Marc N. Teal |
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer),C&M Management Inc.; Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) BCTC II Assignor Corp. |
|
|
|
Marc N. Teal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|