Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-21 - SUBSIDIARIES - HAUPPAUGE DIGITAL INC | v169997_ex21.htm |
EX-32 - CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 - HAUPPAUGE DIGITAL INC | v169997_ex32.htm |
EX-23 - CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP - HAUPPAUGE DIGITAL INC | v169997_ex23.htm |
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 - HAUPPAUGE DIGITAL INC | v169997_ex31-2.htm |
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 - HAUPPAUGE DIGITAL INC | v169997_ex31-1.htm |
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
fiscal year ended September 30,
2009
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from
to
___________
Commission
file number 1-13550
HAUPPAUGE
DIGITAL INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
11-3227864
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
91 Cabot Court, Hauppauge, New
York
|
11788
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Issuer's
telephone number, including area code (631)
434-1600
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:
Title of each class
|
Name of each exchange on which
registered
|
Common
Stock, $.01 par value
|
The
NASDAQ Stock
Market
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:
None
(Title of
class)
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
|
¨
Yes
|
x
No
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.
|
¨
Yes
|
x
No
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past ninety (90) days
|
x
Yes
|
¨
No
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
¨
|
No
¨
|
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):
¨
Large Accelerated Filer
|
¨
Accelerated Filer
|
¨
Non-Accelerated Filer
|
x
Smaller reporting company
|
(Do
not check box if smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2
of the Act).
|
¨
Yes
|
x
No
|
The
aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of the close of business on March 31, 2009 was approximately
$9,326,800 based upon the last price reported on such date on the NASDAQ Global
Market. Non-affiliates include all stockholders other than officers, directors
and 5% stockholders of the registrant.
As of
December 23, 2009, the number of shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value,
outstanding was 10,060,115.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE
None.
PART
I
Special Note Regarding
Forward Looking Statements
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements as that term is
defined in the federal securities laws. The events described in forward-looking
statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not occur. Generally
these statements relate to business plans or strategies, projected or
anticipated benefits or other consequences of our plans or strategies, projected
or anticipated benefits from acquisitions to be made by us, or projections
involving anticipated revenues, earnings or other aspects of our operating
results. The words “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “project,”
“plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” and “continue,” and their opposites and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We caution you
that these statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and are
subject to a number of uncertainties, risks and other influences (including, but
not limited to, those set forth in “Item 1A–Risk Factors”), many of which are
beyond our control, that may influence the accuracy of the statements and the
projections upon which the statements are based. Any one or more of these
uncertainties, risks and other influences could materially affect our results of
operations and whether forward looking statements made by us ultimately prove to
be accurate. Our actual results, performance and achievements could differ
materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether from new information, future events or otherwise. All
cautionary statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be read as
being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they
appear.
ITEM
1. BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
We are a
developer of analog and digital TV tuner and other products for the personal
computer market. Through our Hauppauge Computer Works, Inc., Hauppauge Digital
Europe Sarl and PCTV Systems Sarl subsidiaries, we design, develop, manufacture
and market analog, digital and other types of TV tuners and other devices that
allow PC users to watch television on a PC screen in a resizable window. Most of
our products also enable the recording of TV shows to a PC’s hard disk,
receiving of digital TV data transmissions, and the display of digital media
stored on a computer to a TV set via a home network. We were incorporated in
Delaware in August 1994 and are headquartered in Hauppauge, New York. We have
administrative offices in Luxembourg, Ireland and Singapore, sales offices in
Germany, London, Paris, The Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Singapore, Taiwan
and California and research and development centers in Hauppauge, New York,
Braunschweig, Germany and Taipei,Taiwan.
2
ACQUISTION
OF PCTV ASSETS FROM AVID TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Effective
December 24, 2008, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of October
25, 2008, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Asset Purchase
Agreement (the “Amendment”) (together with the Amendment, the “Asset Purchase
Agreement”), PCTV Systems Sarl, a Luxembourg company (“Buyer”) and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, acquired certain assets and properties (the
“Acquired Assets”) of Avid Technology, Inc. (“Avid”), a Delaware corporation,
Pinnacle Systems, Inc., a California corporation (“Pinnacle”), Avid Technology
GmbH, a limited liability company organized under the laws of Germany, Avid
Development GmbH, a limited liability company organized under the laws of
Germany, and Avid Technology International BV, organized under the laws of the
Netherlands, (collectively, the “Sellers”). The purchase price was approximately
$5,000,000, and consisted of $2,238,000 payable in cash; $2,500,000 payable
pursuant to a Promissory Note, dated December 24, 2008, made payable by the
Buyer to Avid (the “Note”) and the assumption of certain liabilities. In
connection with the transaction, the Buyer or one or more of its affiliates are
employing certain employees and occupying certain facilities located in
Braunschweig, Germany. The Acquired Assets were used by the Sellers in the
business of, among other things, the development, manufacture and sale of TV
tuner devices for receiving over-the-air, satellite and/or cable television
signals that are used in conjunction with personal computers for personal
television viewing.
The
principal amount due pursuant to the Note is payable in 12 equal monthly
installments of $208,333, with the first such payment due and payable on January
24, 2009. Interest on the outstanding principal amount of the Note is payable at
a rate equal to (i) from December 24, 2008 until the Maturity Date (as defined
in the Note), five percent (5%), (ii) from and after the Maturity Date, or
during the continuance of an Event of Default (as defined in the Note), at seven
percent (7%). Pursuant to the terms of the Note, the Buyer and its affiliates
are prohibited from (i) declaring or paying any cash dividend, or making a
distribution on, repurchasing, or redeeming, any class of stock or other equity
or ownership interest in the Buyer or its affiliates, (ii) selling, leasing,
transferring or otherwise disposing of any assets or property of the Buyer or
any of its affiliates, or attempting to or contracting to do so, other than (a)
the sale of inventory in the ordinary course of business and consistent with
past practice, (b) the granting of non-exclusive licenses of intellectual
property in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice
and (c) the sale, lease, transfer or disposition of any assets or property
(other than the Acquired Assets) with a value not to exceed $500,000 in the
aggregate, or (iii) dissolving or liquidating, or merging or consolidating with
any other entity, or acquiring all or substantially all of the stock or assets
of any other entity.
As of
September 30, 2009, three payments remained on the Note and the balance of the
Note was $625,045.
In
connection with the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement,
the Buyer, Hauppauge Digital Europe Sarl (“HDES”), and Hauppauge Computer Works,
Inc. (“HCW”), each a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours (collectively, the
“Subsidiaries”) and the Sellers entered into a Transition Services Agreement,
dated December 24, 2008 (the “TSA”), pursuant to which, among other things, the
parties agreed to provide each other with certain services relating to
infrastructure and systems, order processing and related matters and systems
transition and related matters (the “Services”), as set forth in detail in the
TSA. The fees for such Services are set forth in the TSA. The term of the TSA
shall be until the earlier to occur of (i) 18 months following the closing or
(ii) termination of the last of the Services to be provided pursuant to the TSA.
The TSA may be terminated by the Subsidiaries at any time upon thirty (30) days
prior written notice to the Sellers and may be terminated with respect to any
particular Service to be provided pursuant to the TSA upon ten (10) days prior
written notice to Seller.
The
Transition Services Agreement was terminated by the Subsidiaries as of April 30,
2009.
Further,
Avid, Avid Technology International BV (collectively, the “Consignor”), and HCW
and HDES (collectively, the “Consignee”) entered into an Inventory and Product
Return Agreement, dated December 24, 2008 (the “Inventory Agreement”). Pursuant
to the terms of the Inventory Agreement, the Consignor is obligated to deliver
the Consigned Inventory (as defined in the Inventory Agreement) to the Consignee
and the Consignee is obligated to, as applicable, fill orders from products held
as Consigned Inventory before filling any such orders with products or inventory
other than the Consigned Inventory. Upon the sale of Consigned Inventory by the
Consignee, the Consignee has agreed to pay the Consignor for such Consigned
Inventory as follows: (i) if Consignee sells Consigned Inventory for a price
equal to or greater than Consignor’s Cost (as defined in the Inventory
Agreement) for such Consigned Inventory, then Consignee has agreed to pay
Consignor an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Consignor Cost
for such Consigned Inventory; or (ii) if Consignee sells Consigned Inventory for
a price less than the Consignor Cost for such Consigned Inventory, then
Consignee has agreed to pay Consignor an amount equal to eighty percent (80%) of
the sales price for such Consigned Inventory. The term of the Inventory
Agreement expires 18 months from the date of execution.
3
In
connection with the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement,
Avid, Pinnacle and the Buyer also entered into an Intellectual Property License
Agreement, dated December 24, 2008 (the “IP Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms
of the IP Agreement, Avid and Pinnacle have granted the Buyer certain
irrevocable, personal, non-exclusive, worldwide, fully paid, royalty-free and
non-transferable licenses to certain copyrights and other intellectual property
rights owned by Avid, Pinnacle and their respective subsidiaries, subject to
certain termination provisions as set forth in the IP Agreement.
OUR
STRATEGY
Since our
entry into the PC video market in 1991, management believes that we have become
a leader in bringing TV content to PCs by focusing on five primary strategic
fronts:
|
·
|
innovating
and diversifying our products
|
|
·
|
introducing
new and desirable features in our
products
|
|
·
|
expanding
our domestic and international sales and distribution
channels
|
|
·
|
forging
strategic relationships with key industry
players
|
|
·
|
outsourcing
our production to contract
manufacturers
|
As more
people are looking to PCs for a total entertainment experience, we believe that
our products are able to enhance the capabilities of the PC to enable it to
become a one-stop integrated entertainment system. We feel our current products
and products we may introduce in the future have the potential to be ubiquitous
in PC-based home entertainment systems.
Our
engineering group works on updating our current products to add new and
innovative features that the marketplace seeks, while remaining vigilant in
keeping our manufacturing costs low and trying to ensure that our products are
compatible with new operating systems. This work is done in addition to our
research and development efforts in designing, planning and building new
products.
During
fiscal 2009 our engineering department introduced software support for all of
our WinTV-HVR and WinTV-NOVA products for use with the Microsoft Windows 7
operating system. In addition, we introduced new TV tuner products with the
WinTV-Ministick, the WinTV-Aero Stick, the WinTV-HVR-930 Triple mode TV tuner
stick, the PCTV Nano-stick 73e Ultimate, and the PCTV Picostick.
During
fiscal 2008 our engineering department introduced the HD PVR
High-Definition video
recorder, the WinTV-HVR-1950 and WinTV-HVR-2250 for the North American market
and theWinTV-HVR-2200, WinTV-HVR-900H and WinTV-NOVA-TD for the European
market.
All of
these products are designed to run under the Microsoft Windows 7 operating
system in addition to Microsoft Vista and Microsoft Windows XP. The products for
North America are designed to support the NTSC analog cable TV standard plus
over-the-air ATSC high definition TV and clear QAM digital cable
TV.
4
We
believe that strategic relationships with key suppliers, PC manufacturers,
technology providers, and internet and e-commerce solutions providers give us
important advantages in developing new technologies and marketing our products.
By jointly working with, and sharing our engineering expertise with a variety of
other companies, we seek to leverage our investment in research and development
and minimize time to market.
Our
domestic and international sales and marketing team cultivates a variety of
distribution channels comprised of computer and electronic retailers, computer
products distributors and PC manufacturers. Electronic retailers include retail
stores, web stores and third-party catalogs, both print and on-line, among
others. We work closely with our retailers to enhance sales through joint
advertising campaigns and promotions. We believe that developing our
international presence contributes to our strategic position, allowing us to
benefit from investments in product development, and more firmly establishing
our Hauppauge®, WinTV® and MediaMVP™ brand names in the international
marketplace. We currently have ten sales offices in countries outside of the
U.S.and a sales and R&D facility in Taiwan to service the growing Asian
market.
We seek
to maintain and improve our profit margins by, among other things, outsourcing
our production to contract manufacturers suited to accommodate the type and
volume of our needs. We also leverage international supplier relationships to
assist us in receiving competitive prices for the component parts we buy. We
believe this two-tiered approach allows us to be the lowest cost / highest
quality producer in our marketplace. This approach enables us to focus our human
and financial resources on developing, marketing and distributing our products.
Successfully engineering products to have low production costs and commonality
of parts along with the use of single platforms for multiple models are
additional important ways that we believe our design and build strategy
contributes to our financial performance.
PRODUCTS
Our
products fall under three product categories:
|
·
|
Analog
TV tuners
|
|
·
|
Digital
TV tuners, and combination analog plus digital TV tuner
products
|
|
·
|
Other
non-TV tuner products
|
See “Item
7- Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements comprising part of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information relating to our operating
segments.
Analog TV
Tuners
Our
analog TV tuner products enable, among other things, a PC user to watch analog
cable TV in a resizable window on a PC. Although we continue selling analog TV
tuners in regions outside of the United States, we have stopped developing pure
analog TV tuners, concentrating our engineering resources on digital TV tuners
and combination analog and digital TV tuners, which is detailed in the section
entitled “Digital TV Tuners".
Our WinTV
analog TV tuner products include cable-ready TV tuners with automatic channel
scan and a video digitizer which allows the user to capture still and motion
video images. Some of our analog TV tuner products allow the user to listen to
FM radio, video-conference over the internet (with the addition of a camera or
camcorder), and control these functions with a handheld remote control. In
Europe, our WinTV® analog TV tuner products can be used to receive teletext data
broadcasts, which allow the reception of digital data that is transmitted along
with the “live” TV signal.
Some
WinTV analog TV tuner products are available as external devices which connect
to the PC through the USB port. The USB models are encased in an attractive case
making USB models freely portable from PC to PC and from one desktop, laptop or
notebook computer to another.
5
Our
WinTV-PVR TV recording products include all of the basic features of our analog
TV tuner products, such as TV on the PC screen, channel changing and volume
adjustment. They also add the ability to record TV shows to disk using a
built-in high quality hardware MPEG 2 encoder. This technology allows a typical
desktop computer system to record up to hundreds of hours of video to disk,
limited only by the size of the disk (or storage medium). In addition, the
WinTV-PVR user can pause a live TV show, and then resume watching the TV show at
a later time. The maximum amount of recording time and the maximum amount of
paused TV is dependent upon the hard disk space available on the
PC.
The
WinTV-PVR user can record a TV show to the hard disk using a TV scheduler and
then play the recording back, edit it, and record the show onto a CD-ROM or
DVD-ROM, using a CD or DVD writer, for playback on a home or portable DVD player
or on a PC. The user can re-size the window during viewing, recording or
playback. Our WinTV-PVR products also provide for instant replay and are
available in both internal and external USB models.
An added
feature to the WinTV-PVR-150, WinTV®-PVR-250, WinTV-PVR-500 and WinTV-PVR-USB2
is that they support Microsoft®’s Windows® XP Media Center Edition. Microsoft’s
Windows XP Media Center Edition integrates digital entertainment experiences
including “live” television, PVR, digital music, digital video, DVDs and
pictures. Users can pause, jump forward or watch “live” TV, record a program or
a whole series, and manage digital music, home movies, videos, photos and DVDs
on the PC. Users can also access and control this new entertainment device with
large, easy-to-use-on-screen menus and the Media Center Remote
Control.
We
provide Microsoft certified Media Center drivers for these products to PC
manufacturers and value added resellers for integration into their Windows XP
Media Center PC systems.
With the
global shift to digital TV broadcasts, the sales of our analog family products
have been declining and we expect this decline to continue during the transition
from analog to digital broadcasts.
Digital TV and Combination
Analog plus Digital TV Tuner Products
Our
digital TV tuner products enable, among other things, a PC user to watch digital
television in a resizable window on a PC or laptop screen. There are different
digital TV standards throughout the world, and we develop TV tuner products for
many of these digital TV formats. Examples of digital TV broadcasts we can
receive on our TV tuner products include: over-the-air high definition ATSC,
clear QAM and DVB-C digital cable, digital terrestrial DVB-T, digital satellite
DVB-S and DVB-S2. To support these digital TV formats, and as many of our
primary markets transition from analog to digital TV, we have been concentrating
our engineering resources on digital TV tuner products and have discontinued
development on analog only TV tuners.
We have a
line of external TV tuners called TV “sticks”. TV tuner “sticks” are small TV
tuners which connect to a PC, notebook or netbook computer through the USB port.
TV tuner “sticks’ are typically used for mobile PC users and others who want the
flexibility to simply insert a USB TV tuner and watch TV on their screen. The
small size and UPC plug-in capability are good for use in laptops while
traveling.
Our
WinTV-NOVA products are digital only TV tuners for PCs. They support the various
forms of digital TV and come in either an internal or external form
factor.
Our
WinTV-NOVA-T is a DVB-T digital terrestrial tuner for our European markets which
allows for the viewing of digital terrestrial TV and listening to digital radio
on a PC. The product also allows recording of digital TV and radio to a hard
drive. This product is available as either a PCI card or an external USB
device.
6
Our
WinTV-NOVA-T-500 is a dual tuner DVB-T tuner for our European markets which uses
“Diversity Technology” and allows for the viewing of digital terrestrial
programs while recording another program. The product also allows recording of
two digital TV programs simultaneously or watching one channel while recording
another.
Our
WinTV-NOVA-T-USB2 is an external high performance DVB-T digital TV tuner, with
dual tuners for recording of two digital TV programs simultaneously or watching
one channel while recording another.
Our
WinTV-NOVA-T TV tuner stick is a pocket sized external DVB-T tuner for our
European markets which allows for the viewing of digital terrestrial TV and the
listening of digital radio on a PC or laptop. The product also allows recording
of digital TV and radio to a hard drive. The product’s pocket size and UPC
plug-in capability is good for use in laptops while traveling.
Our
WinTV-NOVA-TD stick, introduced during fiscal 2008, is a pocket-sized external
DVB-T tuner for our European markets, employs “Diversity Technology” with the
use of two antennas to maximize the reception for the viewing of digital
terrestrial TV on a PC or laptop. The product also allows recording of digital
TV to a hard drive in high quality MPEG-2 format. The product’s pocket size and
UPC plug-in capability is good for use in laptops while traveling.
Our
WinTV-Aero stick is a small but powerful external DVB-T tuner with a built-in
telescoping antenna for our European markets which allows a user to watch and
record DVB-T digital TV programs. It has a compact design and was designed for
mobile laptop computers and compact netbook computers. The WinTV-Aero comes with
a remote control and has a built-in external connector which allows a user to
connect it to a rooftop TV antenna when the user is inside their home or office
building.
Our
WinTV-Ministick is a small and portable external DVB-T tuner for our European
markets which allows a user to watch and record digital TV programs on a
netbook, laptop or desktop computer. WinTV-Ministick comes with a remote control
and a portable digital TV antenna which allows a user to watch TV at home or
when they travel.
Our
WinTV-HVR products are combinations of both digital TV and analog TV tuners on
an internal TV tuner board or external USB TV tuner.
Our
WinTV-HVR-900 stick is a pocket sized external tuner for our European markets
which allows for the viewing of digital terrestrial and analog terrestrial TV on
a PC or laptop. Digital and analog programs can be recorded to a hard drive in
high quality MPEG-2 format.
Our
WinTV-HVR-930C stick is a triple mode external tuner for our European markets
which allows for the viewing of digital cable TV and radio, digital terrestrial
TV and radio and analog cable or analog terrestrial TV on a PC or laptop. This
product allows the recording of digital and analog programs to a hard drive in
high quality MPEG-2 format and includes a DVB-T antenna.
Our
WinTV-HVR-950Q stick is a pocket sized external tuner for our North American
markets which allows for the viewing of ATSC high definition TV and NTSC cable
TV on a PC or laptop. The product also allows recording of digital and analog
programs to a hard drive in high quality MPEG-2 format.
Our
WinTV-HVR-1100 and WinTV-HVR-1300 are PCI based tuners for our European markets,
which are designed to be installed inside a desktop PC. These TV tuners allow
the viewing of digital terrestrial and analog terrestrial TV on a PC screen, in
addition to listening to FM radio and DVB-T radio through a PC’s audio system.
These products also allow the recording of digital and analog programs to a hard
drive in high quality MPEG-2 format. The WinTV-HVR-1300 is the higher
performance of the two models, in that it includes a hardware MPEG-2 encoder for
recording analog TV directly to a PC’s hard disk.
7
Our
WinTV-HVR-1400 and WinTV-HVR-1500, introduced during fiscal 2007, are dual tuner
ExpressCard/54 cards designed for notebook computers with ExpressCard/54mm
expansion slots. These TV tuners are for analog and digital TV watching and
recording on laptop computers, and allow the recording of digital programs to a
hard drive in high quality MPEG-2 format and the recording of analog
programs.
Our
WinTV-HVR-1600, introduced during fiscal 2007, is a PCI combination analog and
digital TV tuner for our North American market. The WinTV-HVR-1600 is installed
in an internal PCI slot in a desktop PC and allows the watching and recording of
ATSC high definition TV and NTSC cable TV. The WinTV-HVR-1600 can record all
ATSC formats, including the 1080i format. The WinTV-HVR-1600 also supports
viewing and recording clear QAM digital cable TV channels and includes a remote
control and IR blaster which changes the channels on your satellite or cable TV
set top box.
Our
WinTV-HVR-1800, introduced during fiscal 2007, is a combination analog and
digital PCI Express TV tuner for our North American market. The WinTV-HVR-1800
allows the watching and recording of ATSC high definition TV, clear QAM digital
cable TV and NTSC analog cable TV on a PC.
Our
WinTV-HVR-3000 is a tri-mode PCI based TV tuner for our European markets. The
WinTV-HVR-3000 is installed in a desktop PC and allows watching and recording of
digital terrestrial (DVB-T), satellite (DVB-S) and analog cable TV, in addition
to the ability to listen to FM radio and DVB-T radio. When recording digital TV
programs, the original broadcast format is used which preserves the quality of
the recording.
Our
WinTV-HVR-4000 is a quad-format PCI based TV tuner for our European markets. It
is installed in a desktop PC and can be used to watch and record digital
terrestrial (DVB-T), digital satellite (DVB-S), high definition digital
satellite (DVB-S2) and analog cable TV, in addition to the ability to listen to
FM radio and DVB-T radio. When recording digital TV programs, the original
digital broadcast format is used which preserves the quality of the
recording.
Our
WinTV-NOVA-S is a low cost DVB-S tuner for our European markets which allows for
the viewing
of
satellite based digital programming on a PC. The product also allows for
recording and playback of digital TV, using the high quality MPEG-2 format, and
for listening to digital radio.
Our HD
PVR is a High-Definition video
recorder for making real-time compressed recordings at resolutions up to 1080i.
The HD PVR records component video from cable TV and satellite set top boxes.
With a built-in IR blaster, the HD PVR can automatically change TV channels for
scheduled recordings. The HD PVR recording format can be used to burn Blu-ray
DVD disks. The HD PVRs recording quality allows personal archival of high
definition TV programs from any component video HD set top box. The HD PVR also
has standard definition composite and S-Video inputs which allows you to record
your old home video tapes into an AVCHD format for creating Blu-ray DVD
recordings.
Our
WinTV-HVR-1950 is a high performance external USB based TV tuner for your PC or
laptop. The WinTV-HVR-1950 allows you to watch, pause and record analog cable
TV, clear QAM digital cable TV, or ATSC over-the-air digital TV at up to 1080i
resolution. The product comes with a remote control and IR blaster, and contains
a built-in hardware MPEG-2 encoder for use when recording analog
video.
Our
WinTV-HVR-2200 and WinTV-HVR-2250 products are dual tuner PCI Express based TV
tuners designed to be installed in a desktop PC. These PCI Express boards allow
a PC user to watch, pause or record two analog or digital TV programs at the
same time. A user can either watch one TV program while recording another or can
record two TV programs at once. With the WinTV-HVR-2250, a user in North America
can watch and record analog cable TV or high definition digital ATSC and clear
QAM digital cable TV. With the WinTV-HVR-2200, a user in Europe or Asia can
watch or record analog PAL TV or digital DVB-T TV. Both of these products allow
the recording of analog cable TV programs to a PC's hard disk with our built-in
high quality MPEG-2 hardware encoder.
8
PCTV
products
Our PCTV
products allow Windows or Macintosh users to view television programming on
their computers. Our PCTV line consists of a family of USB sticks with a small
and convenient form factor well-suited for use with laptops and PCI-based cards
more appropriate for desktop users, in addition to PCI cards for use in desktop
computers. PCTV products are positioned as our high end product offering. We
believe that the positioning of the PCTV product line will be complimentary to
our existing WinTV line and will broaden our product offerings.
Other Non-TV Tuner
Products
(i)
|
MediaMVP™
|
Our
MediaMVP™ is a Linux-based digital media device, and is one of a new class of PC
products which link TV sets and PCs. Media, such as music, digital pictures, and
digital videos, are transmitted from the PC, where they are stored, to the
MediaMVP™, where they are converted from a digital format into an analog format,
enabling playback on a TV connected to the MediaMVP™. MediaMVP™ was introduced
to the market in fiscal 2003, and the first shipments to customers were made at
the start of our 2004 fiscal year.
Our
MediaMVP™ enables a user to watch and listen to PC-based videos, music and
pictures on a TV set through a home network. The MediaMVP™ connects to TV sets
or home theater systems and, via an Ethernet network, plays back MP3 music,
MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 videos, and JPEG and GIF digital pictures that have been
recorded and stored on a PC. The MediaMVP™ decodes this media and then outputs
video through composite and S-Video connections for high quality video on TV
sets and high quality audio through stereo audio output connectors to TV sets or
home theater systems.
Our
MediaMVP™ also provides an on-TV-screen display of media directory listings. It
receives commands from the supplied remote control, and sends these commands to
the PC server. The TV menus are created on the PC server, sent over the Ethernet
LAN and displayed by the MediaMVP™’s browser. The MediaMVP™’s remote
control allows a user to pause, fast forward and rewind through videos, plus
pause music and picture shows. A user can adjust the audio volume from the
MediaMVP™’s remote control, avoiding the need to use the TV’s remote control.
The MediaMVP™ is available in a wired or wireless version.
(ii)
|
Video
Capture Products
|
Our
ImpactVCB Video Capture Board (“ImpactVCB”) is a low cost PCI board for high
performance access to digitized video. Designed for PC-based video conferencing
and video capture in industrial applications, the ImpactVCB features “live”
video-in-a-window, still image capture and drivers for Windows® 2000, Windows®
XP, Windows® NT and Windows® 98. There are third party drivers and applications
for use with the Linux operating system.
Our USB
Live is an easy way to watch video, grab images and video conference on the PC
with the addition of a camera. It plugs into the PC’s USB port for easy
installation and brings video into users’ PCs from their camcorder or VCR. Users
can create video movies, save still and motion video images onto their hard disk
with our software, and video conference over the internet with the addition of a
camera or camcorder.
9
|
(iii)
|
Software
Recording Products
|
Our
“Wing” software enables the user to record TV shows on a personal computer for
playback on the Sony Playstation Portable (PSP), Apple iPod and other portable
video players. Wing can also convert existing TV recordings to the PSP and iPod
formats. With the emergence and popularity of portable video players, our Wing
product provides an easy solution for recording live TV shows for playback on
these devices. This product had minimal sales during fiscal 2009.
|
(iv)
|
WinTV-CI
Common Interface Module
|
Our
WinTV-CI common interface module when coupled with a WinTV card, CAM and
SmartCard subscription allows the user to watch popular pay TV channels, such as
movies and sporting events, on a user’s WinTV application.
(v)
Xfones Wireless Headphones for PCs and Macs:
Our
Xfones wireless headphones allow users to listen to the audio produced by their
PC or Mac through a wireless over the ear headphone. The Xfone has the ability
to broadcast to more than one headphone allowing multiple users to listen to the
audio from their PC or Mac.
TECHNOLOGY
Analog TV
Technology
We have
developed four generations of products which convert analog video into digital
video since our first such product was introduced in 1991.
The first
generation of WinTV® products put the TV image on the PC screen using chroma
keying, requiring a dedicated “feature connector cable” between the WinTV® and
the VGA (video) board. Our initial customers were mostly professional PC users,
such as financial market professionals who needed to be able to view stock
market-related TV shows while spending many hours on their PCs, who found having
TV in a window on their desktop useful and entertaining.
In 1993,
we invented a technique called “smartlock”, which eliminated the need for the
“feature connector cable.” In 1994, we introduced the WinTV®-Celebrity
generation of TV tuner boards based on this smartlock technology, greatly
improving customer satisfaction. At the time, our CinemaPro series of WinTV®
boards then used smartlock and other techniques to further reduce cost and
improve performance.
In June
1996, we introduced the WinTV®-PCI line of TV tuner boards for PCs. These boards
were developed to eliminate the relatively expensive smartlock circuitry and
memory used on the WinTV®-Celebrity and CinemaPro products. The WinTV®-PCI used
a technique called “PCI Push” and was designed to be used in the then emerging
Intel® Pentium® market. These Pentium®-based PCs had a new type of system
expansion “bus”, called the PCI bus, which allowed data to be moved at a much
higher rate than the older ISA bus, which the previous WinTV® generations used.
The “PCI Push” technique moves the video image 30 times per second (in Europe
the image is moved 25 times per second) over the PCI bus. In addition to being
less expensive to manufacture, the WinTV®-PCI had higher digital video movie
capture performance than the previous generations, capturing video at up to 30
quarter screen frames per second. With this higher performance capture
capability, the WinTV®-PCI found new uses in video conferencing, video
surveillance and internet streaming video applications.
10
The
fourth generation analog TV tuners are the WinTV®-PVR models which were first
developed during fiscal 2000 and introduced to the market in early fiscal 2001.
The WinTV®-PVRs include both internal PCI and external USB TV tuners which are
designed to add the ability to record TV shows to a PC’s hard disk. The core
technology in the WinTV®-PVR products is a hardware MPEG encoder, which
compresses analog video from a TV tuner or external video source into an MPEG
format in real time. MPEG is the compression format used on DVDs and for the
transmission of digital TV. This MPEG encoder is a purchased chip, to which we
add our driver and application software to create the recording and program
pause functions. Our WinTV®2000 application was enhanced to add the functions
needed to record, pause and play back TV on a PC screen.
Digital TV
Technology
Our
WinTV®-D board, developed during the 1999 fiscal year and delivered to the
market in the beginning of fiscal 2000, was the first ATSC digital TV tuner for
the North American market which allowed PCs to receive, display and record
over-the-air digital TV signals. ATSC digital television is the digital TV
standard for North America which has replaced analog television in the United
States and Canada. In the U.S., all analog over-the-air television transmissions
have ceased as of June 19, 2009 and only digital TV transmissions will be
broadcast. Since our first ATSC digital TV tuner delivered in 2000, we have
introduced 8 new digital TV tuners for use in North America.
In fiscal
1999, we also introduced the WinTV®-DVB board for the European market. This
board brings European digital TV to PCs, and is based on the Digital Video
Broadcast standard. Both the WinTV®-D and the WinTV®-DVB have the ability to
receive special data broadcasts which some broadcasters may send along with the
digital TV signal, in addition to displaying digital TV in a resizable window.
Data broadcasts on digital TV are transmitted at several million bits per
second. Our proprietary software can decode and display some of these special
data broadcasts. We may work on standardized reception and display software, if
such broadcasts become standardized.
The
software to control the digital TV reception is based on our WinTV®-2000
software, which was developed during fiscal 1999 and has had a major update in
2006 and 2008. Over the two fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, we have
further developed the digital TV reception capabilities of our digital family of
products and as of September 30, 2009 we have 18 products for DVB-T terrestrial,
DVB-S and DVB-S2 satellite, ATSC and clear QAM digital TV reception. In
addition, there are seven PCTV products which allow digital TV to be watched on
a PC or notebook computer.
Our
MediaMVP™ is a device which allows TV recordings which are stored on a PC or
notebook computer to be viewed on a TV set. Based on the Linux operating system,
the MediaMVP™ works in a client/server system with a PC, communicating with the
PC ‘server’ and receiving digital media from the PC and displaying the media on
the TV set. The core technology to the MediaMVP™ comprises the configuration and
enhancements to the Linux operating system, the user interface displayed on the
TV set, and the technology to transmit digital media reliably over the local
area network. The MediaMVP™ is available in a wired or wireless
version.
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
Our
development efforts are focused on extending the range and features of our
existing products and developing additional internal and externally attached TV
tuner products. We intend to develop more highly integrated versions of hardware
products to further improve performance and price points, and new versions of
software to add features, improve ease of use, and provide support for new
operating systems.
As of
September 30, 2009, we had three research and development operations: one based
in our Hauppauge, New York headquarters, one based in Taipei, Taiwan, ROC and
one in Braunschweig, Germany. The New York and Taiwan R&D operations are
aimed at extending the range and features of our digital/analog products,
developing additional externally attached TV products, additional
high-definition digital TV products and portable digital players. The
Braunschweig, Germany PCTV research and engineering facility is responsible for
the updating and enhancement of the current PCTV line in addition to developing
new PCTV products.
11
The
technology underlying our products and certain other products in the computer
industry, in general, is subject to rapid change, including the potential
introduction of new types of products and technologies, which may have a
material adverse impact upon our business. See, “Item 1A — Risk
Factors”.
We
maintain an ongoing research and development program. Our future success, of
which there can be no assurances, will depend, in part, on our ability to
respond quickly to technological advances by developing and introducing new
products, successfully incorporating such advances in existing products, and
obtaining licenses, patents, or other proprietary technologies to be used in
connection with new or existing products. We continue to invest in research and
development. We spent approximately $4,422,000 and $3,884,000 for research and
development expenses for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. There can be no assurance that our current and future research and
development will be successful or that we will be able to foresee, and respond
to, advances in technological developments and to successfully develop other
products. Additionally, there can be no assurances that the development of
technologies and products by competitors will not render our products or
technologies non-competitive or obsolete. See “Item 1A- Risk
Factors.”
PRODUCTION
AND SUPPLIERS
We design
the hardware for most models of the WinTV, PCTV and MediaMVP products, and also
write the operating software to be used in conjunction with many versions of the
Microsoft Windows operating system, including Windows 7 and Windows
Vista.
During
fiscal 2009, we sub-contracted the manufacturing and assembly of most of these
products to six independent third parties at facilities in various Asian
countries. We monitor and test the quality of the completed products at any one
of our facilities in the U.S. (Hauppauge, New York), Singapore or Ireland before
packaging the products and shipping them to our customers. We also buy some
models of TV tuner products, such as the WinTV-Nova-T, some models of WinTV-HVR,
WinTV-CI module and XFones from other unrelated third party companies, add
Hauppauge software and sell under our name or on a private label
basis.
Most of
the PCTV products sold by Hauppauge in 2009 were manufactured and assembled by
Avid prior to the PCTV acquisition. They are provided to Hauppauge by Avid as
part of the PCTV Inventory and Product Return Agreement. “See Item 1.
Acquisition of PCTV Assets from Avid Technology, Inc. ” Of the PCTV products not
provided by Avid, we sub-contracted the manufacturing and assembly to two
independent third parties. These two contract manufacturers, both located in
Asia, were previous used by Avid for the manufacturing of PCTV
products.
Certain
component parts, such as TV tuners, video decoder chips and software compression
chips, plus certain assembled products, such as the WinTV-HVR stick products
that are essential to our business, are available from a single source or
limited sources. Other essential component parts that are generally available
from multiple sources may be obtained by us from only a single source or limited
sources because of pricing concerns. See “Item 1A-Risk Factors.”
Components
are subject to industry-wide availability and pricing pressures. Any
availability limitations, interruption in supplies, or price increases could
have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition. In addition, our new products may initially utilize custom components
obtained from only one source. See “Item 1A-Risk Factors.” We typically attempt
to evaluate and qualify additional suppliers for these components.
Where a
product utilizes a new component, initial capacity constraints of the supplier
of that component may exist until such time as the supplier's yields have
matured.
12
Components
are normally acquired through purchase orders, either issued by us or by our
contract manufacturers, typically covering our requirements for a 60-120 day
period from the date of issue. Purchased assembled products are normally covered
by longer term purchase orders. Our principal suppliers of component parts are
Dibcom S.A., NXP Semiconductors and Conexant Systems.
If the
supply of a key component, or a purchased assembled product, were to be delayed
or curtailed, or in the event a key manufacturing vendor delays shipment of
completed products to us or our contract manufacturer, our ability to ship
products in desired quantities, and in a timely manner, will be adversely
affected. Our business, operating results and financial condition will likely be
adversely affected, depending on the time required to obtain sufficient
quantities from the original source or, if possible, to identify and obtain
sufficient quantities from an alternative source. See “Item 1A-Risk Factors.” We
attempt to mitigate these potential risks by working closely with our key
suppliers on product introduction plans, strategic inventories, coordinated
product introductions, and internal and external manufacturing schedules and
levels.
We have,
from time to time, experienced significant price increases and limited
availability of certain components. Similar occurrences in the future could have
a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition. See “Item 1A-Risk Factors.”
During
fiscal 2009 and 2008, all WinTV, PCTV and MediaMVP manufacturing was performed
by six unrelated contract manufacturers in Asia. Product design specifications
are provided by our engineering team to ensure proper assembly. Contract
manufacturing is primarily done on a consignment basis, in which we provide all
the significant component parts and we pay for assembly charges and for certain
additional parts for each board produced. Some products are purchased on a
turnkey basis, in which all components and labor are provided by the
manufacturer, and the manufacturing price includes parts and assembly costs. We
monitor the quality of the finished product produced by our contract
manufacturers. As of September 30, 2009, we had six qualified contract
manufacturers located in Malaysia, Indonesia, Taiwan and China, who are capable
of producing our products to our standards. If demand were to increase
dramatically, we believe additional production could be absorbed by these
qualified contract manufacturers. For fiscal 2009 and 2008 we did not engage any
contract manufacturers in Europe or North America.
CUSTOMER
SERVICE AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
We
maintain customer service and technical support departments in our Hauppauge,
New York headquarters, as well as in the U.K., Germany, France, Italy,
Scandinavia, Taiwan and in Singapore. Technical support is provided to help with
installation problems or pre-sale and post-sale questions on our products, while
customer service provides repair service in accordance with our warranty policy
free of charge for product that is within the warranty period. During fiscal
2009 customer support and technical support for PCTV products was absorbed into
the existing Hauppauge customer support and technical support
infrastructure.
CUSTOMERS
AND MARKETS
We
primarily market our products to the personal computer market, including both
Microsoft Windows and Apple Macintosh based systems. To reach this market, we
sell to a network of computer retailers in the U.S., Europe and Asia and through
computer products distributors and manufacturers. To attract new users to our
products, from time to time we run special promotions and participate in
cooperative advertising with computer retailers. We actively participate in
trade shows to educate and train key computer retail marketing personnel. Most
of our sales and marketing budget is aimed at the consumer
market.
13
Apart
from the typical home user, we also target business users. One example of a
business application is in the securities brokerage industry where our product
is primarily used to display financial TV shows in a window on a broker’s PC
screen while the PC continues to receive financial information. We have sold our
WinTV® products on a direct corporate sales basis to two large financial
services information providers for incorporation into their workstations, and
several independent financial institutions. This market segment is typically
project-based.
We also
offer our products to PC manufacturers that either embed a WinTV® product in a
PC that they sell, or sell the WinTV® as an accessory to the PC.
Sales Channels for Our
Products
We
primarily sell through a sales channel which consist of retailers, PC
manufacturers and distributors. We have no exclusive distributors and retailers.
For fiscal 2009, we had one customer, D&H Distributing, that accounted for
approximately 12% of our net sales. For fiscal 2008, we had one customer, Hon
Hai Precision Industry Co. LTD, that accounted for approximately 16% of our
sales.
Our PCTV
products are offered as our high end line and are sold through similar retail
and distribution channels as our WinTV products.
Marketing and
Sales
We market
our products both domestically and internationally through our sales offices in
the U.S. (New York and California), Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Taiwan
and Singapore, plus through independent sales representative offices in the
Netherlands, Spain, Scandinavia, Poland and Italy. For the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, approximately 48% of our net sales were made within
the U.S., while approximately 52% were made outside the United
States.
More
information on our geographic segments can be obtained from “Item 7-Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and
the notes to the “Consolidated Financial Statements” which comprise part of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
From time
to time, we advertise our products in a number of consumer computer magazines.
We also participate in retailers’ market promotion programs, such as store
circulars and promotions and retail store displays. These in-store promotional
programs, magazine advertisements, plus a public relations program aimed at
editors of key PC computer magazines and an active website on the internet, are
the principal means of getting our product introduced to end users. Our sales in
computer retail stores are closely related to the effectiveness of these
programs, along with the technical capabilities of the products. We also list
our products in catalogs of various mail order companies and attend trade
shows.
We intend
to absorb the marketing and sales of our PCTV line into our existing sales and
marketing structure. It is anticipated that our existing sales personnel will
handle the generating of sales orders and the PCTV line will follow marketing
and advertising programs that are similar to our WinTV programs.
We
currently have fifteen sales people located in Europe, two sales people in the
Far East and two sales people in the U.S., located in New York and California.
In addition to our sales people we also utilize the services of 7 manufacturer
representatives in the United States and 12 manufacturer representatives in
Europe.
See “Item
7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” with reference to a discussion on the impact seasonality has on our
sales.
14
FOREIGN
CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS
For each
of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, at least 40% of our sales
were generated by our European subsidiary and were invoiced and collected in
local currency, which is primarily the Euro. On the supply side, since we
predominantly deal with North American and Asian suppliers and contract
manufacturers, approximately 95% of the our inventory required to support our
European sales is purchased and paid in U.S. Dollars.
The
combination of sales billed in Euros supported by inventory purchased in U.S.
Dollars results in an absence of a natural local currency hedge. Consequently,
our financial results are subject to market risks resulting from the
fluctuations in the Euro to U.S. Dollar exchange rates.
See “Item
1A-Risk Factors” and “Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.”
COMPETITION
Our
business is subject to significant competition. Competition exists from larger
companies that possess substantially greater technical, financial, human, sales
and marketing resources than we do. The dynamics of competition in this market
involve short product life cycles, declining selling prices, evolving industry
standards and frequent new product introductions. We compete against companies
such as ATI Technologies Inc., a division of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and a
number of Asian and European companies. Our MediaMVP™ product competes in the
consumer electronics market, where competition comes from Sony Corporation.,
Toshiba Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc. and others.
We
believe that competition from new entrants into our market will increase as the
market for television in a PC expands. There can be no assurance that we will
not experience increased competition in the future. Such increased competition
may have a material adverse affect on our ability to successfully market our
products. Competition is expected to remain intense and, as a result, we may
lose some of our market share to our competitors. Further, we believe that the
market for our products will continue to be price competitive and thus we could
continue to experience lower selling prices, lower gross profit margins and
reduced profitability levels for such products than in the past. “Item 1A-Risk
Factors”.
Though
management believes that the delivery of TV via the internet will become more
popular in the future, we believe that TV delivered via cable, broadcast or
satellite will continue to dominate the way consumers watch live television.
Since our products connect directly to cable, broadcast and satellite tuners, we
view our products as the preferred way to watch and record TV on the
PC.
PATENTS,
COPYRIGHTS AND TRADEMARKS
With the
proliferation of new products and rapidly changing technology, there is a
significant volume of patents and other intellectual property rights held by
third parties with regard to our market. There are a number of companies that
hold patents for various aspects of the technologies incorporated in some of the
PC and TV industries' standards. Given the nature of our products and
development efforts, there are risks that claims associated with such patents or
intellectual property rights could be asserted by third parties against us. We
expect that parties seeking to gain competitive advantages will increase their
efforts to enforce any patent or intellectual property rights that they may
have. The holders of patents from which we may have not obtained licenses may
take the position that we are required to obtain a license from
them.
15
If a
patent holder refuses to offer such a license or offers such a license on terms
unacceptable to us, there is a risk of incurring substantial litigation or
settlement costs regardless of the merits of the allegations or which party
eventually prevails. If we do not prevail in a litigation suit, we may be
required to pay significant damages and/or cease sales and production of
infringing products and accordingly, may incur significant defense costs.
Additionally, we may need to attempt to design around a given technology,
although there can be no assurances that this would be possible or
economical.
We
currently use technology licensed from third parties in certain products. Our
business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected
by a number of factors relating to these third-party technologies,
including:
|
·
|
failure
by a licensor to accurately develop, timely introduce, promote or support
the technology
|
|
·
|
delays
in shipment of products
|
|
·
|
excess
customer support or product return costs due to problems with licensed
technology and
|
|
·
|
termination
of our relationship with such
licensors
|
We may
not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property through patent,
copyright, trademark and other means of protection. If we fail to adequately
protect our intellectual property, our intellectual property rights may be
misappropriated by others, invalidated or challenged, and our competitors could
duplicate our technology or may otherwise limit any competitive technological
advantage we may have. Due to the rapid pace of technological change, we believe
our success is likely to depend more upon continued innovation, technical
expertise, marketing skills and customer support and service rather than upon
legal protection of our proprietary rights. However, we intend to aggressively
assert our intellectual property rights when necessary.
Even
though we independently develop most of our products and copyright the operating
software which our products use, our success will depend, in a large part, on
our ability to innovate, obtain or license patents, protect trade secrets and
operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. We maintain
copyrights on certain of our designs and software programs, but currently we
have no patent on the WinTV® board or other products.
The
trademarks “Hauppauge®”, “SoftPVR®”, “HardPVR®” , “MediaMVP®” and "WinTV®" have
been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
See “Item
1A-Risk Factors” and “Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.”
EMPLOYEES
As of
September 30, 2009, we employed 169 people domestically and internationally,
including our executive officers, all of whom are employed on a full-time basis,
and none of whom are represented by a union.
Included
in the 169 employees are 25 employees located in Braunschweig, Germany,
primarily consisting of engineers and product support personnel, formerly
employed by Avid Technology, Inc., whom we hired to support our PCTV
operations.
CORPORATE
STRUCTURE
Hauppauge
Digital Inc. was incorporated in the state of Delaware on August 2, 1994. Listed
below is a chart depicting our corporate structure.
16
Corporate
Organization Chart
Hauppauge
Digital Inc. is the parent holding company. Our subsidiaries function as
follows:
Hauppauge
Computer Works, Inc., incorporated in New York, is our United States operating
company. It has locations in Hauppauge, New York and Danville, California. The
Hauppauge, New York location functions as our company headquarters and houses
the executive offices and is responsible for some or all of the following
functions:
|
·
|
Sales
|
|
·
|
Technical
Support
|
|
·
|
Research
and development
|
|
·
|
Warehousing
and shipping
|
|
·
|
Finance
and Administrative
|
|
·
|
Inventory
planning and forecasting
|
Hauppauge
Digital Europe Sarl (“HDE”), incorporated in Luxembourg, is our European
subsidiary. It has the following
wholly-owned subsidiaries:
|
·
|
Hauppauge
Digital Asia Pte Ltd. (incorporated in
Singapore)
|
|
·
|
Hauppauge
Computer Works, GMBH (incorporated in
Germany)
|
|
·
|
Hauppauge
Computed Works Ltd. (incorporated in the United
Kingdom)
|
|
·
|
Hauppauge
Computer Works Sarl (incorporated in
France)
|
The
subsidiaries of HDE listed above function as sales and commission agents, and
are primarily responsible for some or all of the following
functions:
17
|
·
|
Directing
and overseeing European sales, marketing and promotional
efforts
|
|
·
|
Procuring
sales and servicing customers
|
|
·
|
Sales
administration
|
|
·
|
Technical
support
|
|
·
|
Product
and material procurement support
|
|
·
|
Contract
manufacturer and production support
|
Hauppauge
Digital Europe Sarl also has a branch office in Blanchardstown, Ireland, which
functions as our European distribution center and is responsible for some or all
of our following functions:
|
·
|
Warehousing
of product
|
|
·
|
Shipment
of product
|
|
·
|
Repair
center
|
|
·
|
European
logistics center
|
Hauppauge
Digital Inc. Taiwan was incorporated during fiscal 2004 in Taiwan, ROC and is
responsible for some or all of the following functions:
|
·
|
Sales
administration for Asia and China
|
|
·
|
Research
and development activities
|
PCTV
Systems Sarl (Luxembourg) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Hauppauge Digital Inc.
This subsidiary was created to be the holding company of certain assets and
properties acquired from Avid Technology, Inc., Pinnacle Systems, Inc., Avid
Technology GmbH, Avid Development GmbH and Avid Technology International BV.
PCTV Systems GMBH is a division of PCTV Systems Sarl, Luxembourg. Located in
Germany, PCTV Systems GMBH is responsible for PCTV research and
development.
Hauppauge
Computer Works, Inc. is in turn the holding company of a foreign sales
corporation, Hauppauge Computer Works, Ltd, (incorporated in the U.S. Virgin
Islands).
HCW
Distributing Corp., incorporated in New York, is an inactive
company.
Our
executive offices are located at 91 Cabot Court, Hauppauge, New York 11788, and
our telephone number at that address is (631) 434-1600. Our internet address is
http://www.hauppauge.com.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
Our
operating results and financial condition are subject to various risks and
uncertainties, including those described below, that could materially adversely
affect our business, operating results and financial condition, any of which
could negatively affect the trading price of our Common Stock. Because of the
following factors, as well as other variables affecting our business, operating
results and financial condition, past performance may not be a reliable
indicator of future performance, and historical trends should not be used to
anticipate results or trends for future periods.
If TV technology for the PC, or our
implementation of this technology, is not accepted, we will not be able to
sustain or expand our business.
Our
future success depends on the growing use and acceptance of TV and video
applications for PCs. The market for these applications is still evolving, and
may not develop to the extent necessary to enable us to further expand our
business. We have invested, and continue to invest, significant time and
resources in the development of new products for this market.
18
Our:
|
·
|
dependence
on sales of TV and video products for the
PC
|
|
·
|
lack
of market diversification
|
|
·
|
concentration
on the North American and European market for the majority of our
sales
|
|
·
|
potential
inability to remain ahead of the development of competing
technologies
|
could
each have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and
financial condition if we are unable to address any of the factors listed
above.
We
rely upon sales of a small number of product lines, and the failure of any one
product line to be successful in the market could substantially reduce our
sales.
We
currently rely upon sales from our existing product lines of internal and
external products to generate a majority of our sales. While we continue to
develop additional products within these and other product lines, there can be
no assurance that we will be successful in doing so. Consequently, if the
existing or future products are not successful, sales could decline
substantially, which would have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results and financial condition.
We
rely heavily on the success of retailers, dealers and PC manufacturers to
market, sell and distribute our products. If these channels are not effective in
distributing our products, our sales could be reduced.
These
retailers, dealers and PC manufacturers may not effectively promote or market
our products or they may experience financial difficulties and even close
operations. Our sales channels are not contractually obligated to sell our
products, and they typically sell on an “as needed” basis. Therefore, they may,
at any time:
|
·
|
refuse
to promote our products
|
|
·
|
discontinue
the use of our products in favor of a competitor's
product
|
Also,
with a distribution channel standing between us and the actual end user, we may
not be able to accurately gauge current demand and anticipate future demand for
our products. For example, retailers, dealers and PC manufacturers may place
large initial orders for a new product just to keep their stores and products
stocked with the newest TV tuners and not because there is a significant demand
for them.
We
operate in a highly competitive market, and many of our competitors have much
greater resources, which may make it difficult for us to remain
competitive.
Our
business is subject to significant competition. Competition exists from larger
companies that possess substantially greater technical, financial, human, sales
and marketing resources than we do. The dynamics of competition in this market
involve short product life cycles, declining selling prices, evolving industry
standards and frequent new product introductions. We compete against companies
such as ATI Technologies Inc., a division of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., and a
number of Asian and European companies. Our MediaMVP™ product competes in the
consumer electronics market, where competition comes from Sony Corporation,
Toshiba Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc. and others.
19
We
believe that competition from new entrants will increase as the market for
digital video in a PC expands. There can be no assurance that we will not
experience increased competition in the future. Such increased competition may
have a material adverse affect on our ability to successfully market our
products. Competition is expected to remain intense and, as a result, we may
lose some of our market share to our competitors. Further, we believe that the
market for our products will continue to be price competitive and thus we could
continue to experience lower selling prices, lower gross profit margins and
reduced profitability levels for such products than in the past.
Rapid
technological changes and short product life cycles in our industry and the
availability of new products, services and technologies could harm our
business.
The
technology underlying our products and other products in the computer industry,
in general, is subject to rapid change, including the potential introduction of
new types of products, services and technologies, which may have a material
adverse impact upon our business, operating results and financial condition. The
pervasive availability of new products, services (including internet services)
and technologies may have a material adverse impact upon our business, operating
results and financial condition. We will need to maintain an ongoing research
and development program, and our potential future success, of which there can be
no assurances, will depend, in part, on our ability to respond quickly to
technological advances by developing and introducing new products, successfully
incorporating such advances in existing products, and obtaining licenses,
patents, or other proprietary technologies to be used in connection with new or
existing products. We expended approximately $4,422,000 and $3,884,000 for
research and development expenses for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively. There can be no assurance that our research and
development will be successful or that we will be able to foresee and respond to
such advances in technological developments and to successfully develop
additional products. Additionally, there can be no assurances that the
development of technologies, services or products by competitors will not render
our products or technologies non-competitive or obsolete.
If TV or
video capabilities are included in PCs or in operating systems, it could result
in a reduction in the demand for add-on TV and video devices. Although we
believe that our software is a competitive strength, as operating systems such
as Windows move to integrate and standardize software support for video
capabilities, we will be challenged to further differentiate our products. Our
operating results and ability to retain our market share are also dependent on
continued growth in the underlying markets for PC, TV and video
products.
We
may not be able to timely adopt emerging industry standards, which may make our
products unacceptable to potential customers, delay our product introductions or
increase our costs.
Our
products must comply with a number of current industry standards and practices
established by various international bodies. Failure to comply with evolving
standards, including video compression standards, TV transmission standards, and
PC interface standards, will limit acceptance of our products by the market. If
new standards are adopted in the industry, we will be required to adopt those
standards in our products. It may take a significant amount of time to develop
and design products incorporating these new standards, and we may not succeed in
doing so. We may also become dependent upon products developed by third parties
and have to pay royalty fees, which may be substantial, to the developers of the
technology that constitutes the newly adopted standards.
We
are dependent upon foreign markets for sales of our products, primarily the
European market, and adverse changes in these markets could reduce our
sales.
Our
future performance will likely be dependent, in large part, on our ability to
continue to compete successfully in the European markets, where a large portion
of our current and potential customers are located. Our ability to compete in
these markets will depend on many factors, including:
|
·
|
the
economic conditions in these
regions
|
|
·
|
the
value of the euro versus the U.S.
dollar
|
20
|
·
|
the
stability of the political environment in these
regions
|
|
·
|
adverse
changes in the relationships between major countries in these
regions
|
|
·
|
the
state of trade relations among these regions and the United
States
|
|
·
|
restrictions
on trade in these regions
|
|
·
|
the
imposition or changing of tariffs by the countries in these regions on
products of the type that we sell
|
|
·
|
changes
in the regulatory environment in these
regions
|
|
·
|
export
restrictions and export license
requirements
|
|
·
|
restrictions
on the export of critical
technology
|
|
·
|
our
ability to develop PC TV products that meet the varied technical
requirements of customers in each of these
regions
|
|
·
|
our
ability to maintain satisfactory relationships with our foreign customers
and distributors
|
|
·
|
changes
in freight rates
|
|
·
|
our
ability to enforce agreements and other rights in the countries in these
regions
|
|
·
|
difficulties
in staffing and managing international
operations
|
|
·
|
difficulties
assessing new and existing international markets and credit
risks
|
|
·
|
potential
insolvency of international customers and difficulty in collecting
accounts
|
If we are
unable to address any of these factors, it could have a material adverse effect
on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We
are heavily dependent upon foreign manufacturing facilities for our products,
primarily facilities in Asia, which exposes us to additional risks.
The
majority of our products are built at contract manufacturing facilities in Asia.
Our ability to successfully build products at overseas locations will depend on
many factors, including:
|
·
|
the
economic conditions in these
regions
|
|
·
|
the
acceptance of the U.S. dollar as the currency to purchase manufactured
products
|
|
·
|
the
stability of the political environment in these
regions
|
|
·
|
adverse
changes in the relationships between major countries in these
regions
|
|
·
|
the
state of trade relations among these regions and the United
States
|
|
·
|
restrictions
on trade in these regions
|
|
·
|
the
imposition or changing of tariffs by the countries in these regions on
products of the type that we sell
|
|
·
|
changes
in the regulatory environment in these
regions
|
|
·
|
import
restrictions and import license
requirements
|
|
·
|
our
ability to maintain satisfactory relationships with our foreign
manufacturers
|
|
·
|
changes
in freight rates
|
|
·
|
difficulties
in staffing and managing international
operations
|
|
·
|
potential
insolvency of vendors and difficulty in obtaining
materials
|
If we are
unable to address any of these factors, it could have a material adverse effect
on our business, operating results and financial condition.
21
Foreign
currency exchange fluctuations could adversely affect our results.
For the
two fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, at least 40% of our sales
were generated by our European subsidiary and were invoiced and collected in
local currency, which was primarily the Euro. On the supply side, since we
predominantly deal with North American and Asian suppliers and contract
manufacturers, approximately 95% of our inventory required to support our
European sales are purchased and paid in U.S. Dollars.
The
combination of sales billed in Euros supported by inventory purchased in U.S.
Dollars results in an absence of a natural local currency hedge. Consequently,
our financial results are subject to market risks resulting from the
fluctuations in the Euro to U.S. Dollar exchange rates.
See “Item
7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.”
We
may be unable to develop new products that meet customer requirements in a
timely manner.
Our
success is dependent on our ability to continue to introduce new products with
advanced features, functionality and performance that our customers demand. We
may not be able to introduce new products on a timely basis, that are accepted
by the market, and that sell in quantities sufficient to make the products
viable for the long-term. Sales of new products may negatively impact sales of
existing products. In addition, we may have difficulty establishing our
products' presence in markets where they do not currently have significant brand
recognition.
We
may experience declining margins.
For
several years we have experienced declining gross margins due to the following
factors, among others:
|
·
|
larger
sales mix of lower margin products
|
|
·
|
changes
in foreign currency exchange rates
|
|
·
|
allowances
for excess inventory
|
|
·
|
increases
in costs charged by contract
manufacturers
|
|
·
|
increases
in duty and tariff rates
|
|
·
|
increases
in shipping costs
|
|
·
|
lower
average selling prices
|
|
·
|
increases
in material acquisition costs and
|
|
·
|
different
gross margins for like products in different
markets
|
Consequently,
as margins may decline, our profitability will be more dependent upon effective
cost management controls. There can be no assurances that such cost and
management controls can be implemented and maintained, and if implemented, that
they will be successful.
We
have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, downward pricing
pressure on our products, which could substantially impair our operating
performance.
We are
experiencing, and are likely to continue to experience, downward pricing
pressure on our products. As a result, we have experienced, and we expect to
continue to experience, declining average sales prices for our products.
Increases in the number of units that we are able to sell and reductions in per
unit costs may not occur, and if they occur, they may not be sufficient to
offset reductions in per unit sales prices, in which case our net income would
be reduced and we could incur losses. Since we typically negotiate supply
arrangements far in advance of delivery dates, we may need to commit to price
reductions for our products before we are aware of how, or if, these cost
reductions can be obtained. As a result, any current or future price reduction
commitments and our inability to respond to increased price competition could
have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition.
22
Our
cost reduction and operational efficiency programs may not achieve the intended
results
Changing
economic and business conditions may dictate that we undertake a plan of cost
and operational efficiency reductions. We cannot be certain that these programs
will achieve their intended results. Additionally, these programs may be
misplaced or insufficient for purposes of positioning us for future growth, in
which case our long-term competitive position may suffer. Failure of these
programs, if any, could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results and financial condition.
We
are dependent upon contract manufacturers for our production. If these
manufacturers do not meet our requirements, either in volume or quality, then we
could be materially harmed.
During
fiscal 2009, we subcontracted the manufacturing and assembly of our products to
six independent third parties at facilities in various Asian
countries.
Relying
on subcontractors involves a number of significant risks,
including:
·
|
loss
of control over the manufacturing
process
|
·
|
potential
absence of adequate production
capacity
|
·
|
potential
delays in production lead times
|
·
|
unavailability
of certain process technologies
|
·
|
reduced
control over delivery schedules, manufacturing yields, quality and costs,
and
|
·
|
unexpected
increases in component costs
|
We may
need to hold more inventory than is immediately required to compensate for
potential manufacturing disruptions.
If our
significant subcontractors become unable or unwilling to continue to manufacture
these products in required volumes, we will have to identify qualified alternate
subcontractors. Additional qualified subcontractors may not be available, or may
not be available on a timely or cost competitive basis. Any interruption in the
supply of, or increase in the cost of, the products manufactured by third party
subcontractors could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating
results and financial condition.
We
are dependent upon single or limited source suppliers for our components and
assembled products. If these suppliers do not meet the demand, either in volume
or quality, then we could be materially harmed.
If the
supply of a key component or assembled product, such as the WinTV-HVR-900, the
WinTV-Nova-T-Stick or a PCTV product, were to be delayed or curtailed or in the
event a key manufacturing or sole vendor delays shipment of such components or
completed products, our ability to ship products in desired quantities and in a
timely manner would be adversely affected. Our business, operating results and
financial condition could also be adversely affected, depending on the time
required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source or, if
possible, to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative
source. We attempt to mitigate these potential risks by working closely with our
key suppliers on product introduction plans, strategic inventories, coordinated
product introductions, and internal and external manufacturing schedules and
levels. We are also seeking out alternative sources for assembled products,
making us less dependent on a single or limited source.
We may
need to hold more inventory than is immediately required to compensate for
potential component shortages or discontinuation. This could lead to an increase
in the costs of manufacturing or assembling our products.
If any
single or limited source supplier becomes unable or unwilling to continue to
supply these components or assembled products in required volumes, we will have
to identify and qualify acceptable replacements or redesign our products with
different components. Additional sources may not be available, or product
redesign may not be feasible on a timely basis. Any interruption in the supply
of or increase in the cost of the components and assembled products provided by
single or limited source suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results and financial condition.
23
We
may incur excessive expenses if we are unable to accurately forecast sales of
our products.
We
generally ship products within one to four weeks after receipt of orders.
Therefore, our sales backlog is typically minimal. Accordingly, our expectations
of future net sales and our product manufacturing and materials planning are
based largely on our own estimates of future demand and not on firm customer
orders.
If we
obtain orders in excess of our internal forecasts, we may be unable to timely
increase production to meet demand which could have a material adverse effect on
our business, operating results and financial condition. If our net sales do not
meet expectations, our business, operating results and financial condition would
be adversely affected, we may be burdened with excess inventory, and we may be
subject to excess costs or inventory write-offs.
We
may experience a reduction in sales if we are unable to respond quickly to
changes in the market for our products.
Our net
sales can be affected by changes in the quantity of products that our retail,
distributor and PC manufacturer customers maintain in their inventories. We may
be directly and rapidly affected by changes in the market, including the impact
of any slowdown or rapid increase in end user demand. Despite efforts to reduce
distribution channel inventory exposure, retailers, distribution partners and PC
manufacturer customers may still choose to alter their inventory levels, which
could cause a reduction in our net sales; this could have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We
may accumulate inventory to minimize the impact of shortages from manufacturers
and suppliers, which may result in obsolete inventory that we may need to write
off resulting in losses.
Managing
our inventory is complicated by fluctuations in the demand for our products as
well as the issues of using contract manufacturers and procuring components from
suppliers mentioned above. As we must plan to have sufficient quantities of
products available to satisfy our customers' demands, we sometimes accumulate
inventory for a period of time to minimize the impact of possible insufficient
capacity or availability of components from our manufacturers and suppliers.
Although we expect to sell the inventory within a short period of time, products
may remain in inventory for extended periods of time and may become obsolete
because of the passage of time and the introduction of new products or new
components within existing products. In these situations, we would be required
to write off obsolete inventory which could have a material adverse effect on
our business, operating results and financial condition.
We
may need financing, and may not be able to raise financing on favorable terms,
if at all, which could increase our costs and limit our ability to grow and
operate.
We
anticipate that we may need to raise additional capital in the future to
continue our long term expansion plans, to respond to competitive pressures or
to respond to unanticipated requirements. On March 31, 2009, our line of credit
with the JP Morgan Chase Bank expired and was not renewed. We cannot be certain
that we will be able to obtain financing on commercially reasonable terms, if at
all. Our failure or inability to obtain financing on acceptable terms could
require us to limit our plans for expansion, incur indebtedness that has high
rates of interest or substantial restrictive covenants, issue equity securities
that will dilute existing stockholders’ holdings or discontinue a portion of our
operations, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results and financial condition.
24
We
may become involved in costly intellectual property disputes.
With the
proliferation of new products and rapidly changing technology, there is a
significant volume of patents and other intellectual property rights held by
third parties. There are a number of companies that hold patents for various
aspects of the technologies incorporated in some of the PC and TV industries'
standards. Given the nature of our products and development efforts, there are
risks that claims associated with such patents or intellectual property rights
could be asserted by third parties against us. We expect that parties seeking to
gain competitive advantages will increase their efforts to enforce any patent or
intellectual property rights that they may have. The holders of patents from
which we may have not obtained licenses may take the position that it is
required to obtain a license from them.
If a
patent holder refuses to offer such a license or offers such a license on terms
unacceptable to us, there is a risk of incurring substantial litigation or
settlement costs regardless of the merits of the allegations, or which party
eventually prevails. If we do not prevail in a litigation suit, we may be
required to pay significant damages and/or to cease sales and production of
infringing products and accordingly, may incur significant defense costs.
Additionally, we may need to attempt to design around a given technology,
although there can be no assurances that this would be possible or
economical.
We
currently use technology licensed from third parties in certain products. Our
business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected
by a number of factors relating to these third-party technologies,
including:
|
·
|
failure
by a licensor to accurately develop, timely introduce, promote or support
the technology
|
|
·
|
delays
in shipment of products
|
|
·
|
excess
customer support or product return costs due to problems with licensed
technology
|
|
·
|
termination
of our relationship with such
licensors
|
We
may be unable to enforce our intellectual property rights.
We may
not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property through patent,
copyright, trademark and other means of protection. If we fail to adequately
protect our intellectual property, our intellectual property rights may be
misappropriated by others, invalidated or challenged, and our competitors could
duplicate our technology or may otherwise limit any competitive technological
advantage we may have. Due to the rapid pace of technological change, we believe
our success is likely to depend more upon continued innovation, technical
expertise, marketing skills and customer support and service rather than upon
legal protection of our proprietary rights. However, we intend to aggressively
assert our intellectual property rights when necessary.
Even
though we typically develop our products independently, our success, of which
there can be no assurances, will depend, in a large part, on our ability to
innovate, obtain or license patents, protect trade secrets, copyrights and
trademarks, and draw upon our proprietary technology without infringing on the
proprietary rights of others. We maintain copyrights on our designs and software
programs, but currently we have no patent on the WinTV® board as we believe that
such technology cannot be patented.
We have
no patents issued or pending that relate to our technology. We are subject to a
number of risks relating to intellectual property rights, including the
following:
|
·
|
the
means by which we seek to protect our proprietary rights may not be
adequate to prevent others from misappropriating our technology or from
independently developing or selling technology or products with features
based on or similar to our products
|
|
·
|
our
products may be sold in foreign countries that provide less protection to
intellectual property than is provided under U.S. laws
|
· | our intellectual property rights may be challenged, invalidated, violated or circumvented and may not provide us with any competitive advantage |
25
We
may not be able to attract and retain qualified managerial and other skilled
personnel.
Our
success, of which there can be no assurances, depends, in part, on our ability
to identify, attract, motivate and retain qualified managerial, technical and
sales personnel. Our success, of which there can be no assurances, is dependent
on our ability to manage effectively the enhancement and introduction of
existing and new products and the marketing of such products. We are
particularly dependent on our ability to identify, attract, motivate and retain
qualified managers, engineers and salespersons. The loss of the services of a
significant number of engineers or sales people or one or more senior officers
or managers could be disruptive to product development efforts or business
relationships and could seriously harm our business.
We
depend on a limited number of key personnel, and the loss of any of their
services could adversely affect our future growth and profitability and could
substantially interfere with our operations.
Our
products are complex and our market is evolving. The success of our business
depends in large part upon the continuing contributions of our management and
technical personnel. The loss of the services of any of our key officers or
employees could adversely affect our future growth and profitability and could
have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition.
Our
dependence upon our key officers and employees is increased by the fact that
they are responsible for our sales and marketing efforts as well as our overall
operations. We do not have key person life insurance policies covering any of
our employees other than Mr. Plotkin, our President, Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer. The insurance coverage that
we have on him may be insufficient to compensate us for the loss of his
services.
We
may not be able to effectively integrate businesses or assets that we
acquire.
We may
identify and pursue acquisitions of complementary companies and strategic
assets, such as customer bases, products and technology. However, there can be
no assurance that we will be able to identify suitable acquisition
opportunities.
If any
such opportunity involves the acquisition of a business, we cannot be certain
that:
|
·
|
we
will successfully integrate the operations of the acquired business with
our own
|
|
·
|
all
the benefits expected from such integration will be
realized
|
|
·
|
management's
attention will not be diverted or divided, to the detriment of current
operations
|
|
·
|
amortization
of acquired intangible assets will not have a negative effect on operating
results or other aspects of our
business
|
|
·
|
delays
or unexpected costs related to the acquisition will not have a detrimental
effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition
|
|
·
|
customer
dissatisfaction with, or performance problems at, an acquired company will
not have an adverse effect on our
reputation
|
|
·
|
respective
operations, management and personnel will be
compatible
|
In most
cases, acquisitions will be consummated without seeking and obtaining
stockholder approval, in which case stockholders will not have an opportunity to
consider and vote upon the merits of such an acquisition. Although we will
endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular acquisition, there can
be no assurance that we will properly ascertain or assess such
risks.
26
Our
products could contain defects, which could result in delays in recognition of
sales, loss of sales, loss of market share, or failure to achieve market
acceptance, or claims against us.
We
develop complex products for TV and video processing. Despite testing by our
engineers, subcontractors and customers, errors may be found in existing or
future products. This could result in, among other things, a delay in
recognition of sales, loss of sales, loss of market share, failure to achieve
market acceptance or substantial damage to our reputation. We could be subject
to material claims by customers, and may need to incur substantial expenses to
correct any product defects. We do not have product liability insurance to
protect against losses caused by defects in our products, and we also do not
have "errors and omissions" insurance. As a result, any payments that we may
need to make to satisfy our customers may be substantial and may result in a
substantial charge to earnings.
We
may experience fluctuations in our future operating results, which will make
predicting our future results difficult.
Historically,
our quarterly and annual operating results have varied significantly from period
to period, and we expect that our results will continue to do so. These
fluctuations result from a variety of factors, including:
·
|
market
acceptance of our products
|
|
·
|
changes
in order flow from our customers, and their inability to forecast their
needs accurately
|
·
|
the
timing of our new product announcements and of announcements by our
competitors
|
·
|
increased
competition, including changes in pricing by us and our
competitors
|
·
|
delays
in deliveries from our limited number of suppliers and
subcontractors
|
·
|
difficulty
in implementing effective cost management constraints;
and
|
·
|
market
and economic conditions
|
As our
sales are primarily to the consumer market, we have experienced certain seasonal
revenue trends. Our peak sales quarter, due to holiday season sales of computer
equipment, is typically our first fiscal quarter (October to December), followed
by our second fiscal quarter (January to March). In addition, our international
sales, mostly in the European market, were 52% of sales for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our fiscal fourth quarter sales
(July to September) can be potentially impacted by the reduction of activity
experienced in Europe during the July and August summer holiday period.
Accordingly, any sales or net income in any particular period may be lower than
the sales and net income in a preceding or comparable period. Period-to-period
comparisons of our results of operations may not be meaningful, and should not
be relied upon as indications of our future performance. In addition, our
operating results may be below the expectations of securities analysts and
investors in future periods. Failure to meet such expectations, should such an
event occur, will likely cause our share price to decline.
Our
Common Stock price is highly volatile.
The
market price of our Common Stock has been, and may continue to be, subject to a
high degree of volatility. Numerous factors may have a significant impact on the
market price of our Common Stock, including:
·
|
general
conditions in the PC and TV
industries
|
·
|
product
pricing
|
·
|
new
product introductions
|
·
|
market
growth forecasts
|
·
|
technological
innovations
|
·
|
mergers
and acquisitions
|
·
|
announcements
of quarterly operating results
|
·
|
overall
U.S. and international economic and market conditions and economic
health
|
·
|
stability
of the U.S. and international securities
markets
|
27
In
addition, stock markets have experienced extreme price volatility and broad
market fluctuations in recent years. This volatility has had a substantial
effect on the market price of securities issued by many high technology
companies in many cases for reasons unrelated to the operating performance of
the specific companies. The price of our Common Stock has experienced volatility
not necessarily related to our performance.
We
may not be able to maintain compliance with the requirements under the NASDAQ
Listing Rules or we may not be able to maintain our NASDAQ listing.
On
October 6, 2009, NASDAQ notified us that we were subject to delisting based on
our failure to timely hold our annual meeting. In accordance with NASDAQ’s
Listing Rules, we requested a hearing before a NASDAQ Hearings Panel. On
November 12, 2009, we appeared before the Panel and presented our plan to regain
compliance. On December 9, 2009, we held our annual meeting and on December 10,
2009, the Panel rendered its determination to continue our listing. The decision
of the Panel is subject to review by the NASDAQ Listing and Review Council
within 45 days following the issuance of the Panel’s written
decision.
On
November 18, 2009, we received a letter from NASDAQ indicating that we are not
in compliance with NASDAQ’s minimum bid price rule. The letter noted that, for
the thirty consecutive trading days prior to November 18, 2009, our minimum
closing bid price per share had been below the $1.00 minimum bid price
requirement set forth in NASDAQ Rule 5450(a)(1). In accordance with NASDAQ Rule
5810(c)(3)(A), we have 180 days, or until May 17, 2010, to regain compliance. In
its notice, NASDAQ indicated that, if at any time during this period the minimum
closing bid price is $1.00 or more per share for at least ten consecutive
trading days, NASDAQ will provide confirmation that we have regained
compliance.
Should we
fail to regain compliance by May 17, 2010, NASDAQ has advised it will then
provide a notice to us that our common stock will be delisted. However, we may
be eligible for an additional grace period if we satisfy all the requirements,
other than the minimum bid price requirement, for initial listing on the NASDAQ
Capital Market, set forth in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5505. In order to take
advantage of this alternative we will need to submit an application to transfer
our securities to the NASDAQ Capital Market.
No
assurances can be provided that we will be able to achieve or maintain
compliance with the requirements under the NASDAQ continued listing rules or
standards (including the minimum bid price rule) or that we will maintain our
NASDAQ listing.
We
may not be able to maintain our listing on the NASDAQ Global Market or be
eligible to for admittance on the NASDAQ Capital Market .
If our
securities are delisted by NASDAQ, then the market liquidity for such securities
would likely be negatively affected, which may make it more difficult for
holders to sell such securities in the open market, and we could face additional
difficulty raising capital necessary for our continued operation. Investors may
find it more difficult to dispose of or obtain accurate quotations as to the
market value of our securities.
Our
Amended and Restated By-Laws and the Rights Agreement to which we are party may
have anti-takeover effects, limiting the ability of outside stockholders to seek
control of management, and any premium over market price that an acquirer might
otherwise pay may be reduced and any merger or takeover may be
delayed.
28
Effective
August 16, 2001, the Board of Directors unanimously approved Amended and
Restated By-Laws for us (the “By-Laws”). The By-Laws do not permit stockholders
to call a special meeting of stockholders and consequently, an expensive proxy
contest cannot occur other than in connection with the annual meeting of
stockholders. The By-Laws also impose strict requirements for shareholder
proposals and nominations of prospective board members other than those
nominated by or at the discretion of the Board of Directors. These amendments
may collectively or individually impact a person’s decision to purchase voting
securities in our company and may have anti-takeover effects in that any merger
or takeover may be delayed. Accordingly, any premium over market price that an
acquirer might otherwise pay may be reduced.
On July
19, 2001, the Board of Directors declared a dividend distribution of one Right
for each outstanding share of our Common Stock to stockholders of record at the
close of business on August 5, 2001. Each Right entitles the registered holder
to purchase from us one Common Share at a purchase price of $11.00 per share,
subject to adjustment and terms set out in the Rights Agreement between us and
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent. The Rights may
have certain anti-takeover effects. The Rights will cause substantial dilution
to a person or group that attempts to acquire us in a manner which causes the
Rights to become discount Rights unless the offer is conditional on a
substantial number of Rights being acquired. Accordingly, any premium over
market price that an acquirer might otherwise pay may be reduced.
We
have paid no dividends and none are anticipated.
We have
never paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock and do not contemplate or
anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable
future. It is currently anticipated that earnings, if any, will be used to
finance the development and expansion of the business. In addition, the Note
contains restrictions on the payment of dividends, among other things. See Item
1. Business – “Acquisition of PCTVAssets from Avid Technology,
Inc.”
We
may not be able to effectively integrate the PCTV Systems
operation.
In regard
to the acquisition of the assets of the PCTV Systems operation, we may not be
able to successfully integrate the operations of the Acquired Assets with our
own and realize benefits expected from such integration. In
addition:
|
·
|
management's
attention may be diverted or divided to the detriment of current
operations
|
|
·
|
amortization
of acquired intangible assets may have a negative effect on operating
results or other aspects of our
business
|
|
·
|
delays
or unexpected costs related to the acquisition may have a detrimental
effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition
|
|
·
|
customer
dissatisfaction with, or performance problems with respect to, the
Acquired Assets may have an adverse effect on our
reputation
|
|
·
|
operations,
management and personnel may not be
compatible
|
Forward
looking statements.
From time
to time, information provided by us, statements made by our employees or
information provided in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings,
including information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, may contain
forward looking information. Our actual future results may differ materially
from those projections or statements made in such forward looking information as
a result of various risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to,
rapid changes in technology, lack of funds for research and development,
competition, proprietary patents and rights of others, loss of major customers,
loss of sources of supply for our components, non-availability of management,
government regulation, currency fluctuations and our inability to profitably
sell our products. The market price of our Common Stock may be volatile at times
in response to fluctuations in our quarterly operating results, changes in
analysts' earnings estimates, market conditions in the computer hardware
industry, seasonality of the business cycle, as well as general conditions and
other external factors.
29
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not
applicable
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
We occupy
a facility located at 91 Cabot Court, Hauppauge, New York that we use for our
executive offices and for the testing, storage and shipping of our products.
Hauppauge Computer Works, Inc., (“HCW”) leased the premises (the “1990 Lease”),
from Ladokk Realty Co., a real estate partnership which is principally owned by
Kenneth Plotkin, our President, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Operating Officer and the holder of approximately 7.97% of our shares
of Common Stock as of September 30, 2009, Dorothy Plotkin, the wife of Kenneth
Plotkin, holder of approximately 5.48% of our shares of Common Stock as
September 30, 2009, and Laura Aupperle, believed by us to be the holder of
approximately 7.02% of our shares of Common Stock as of September 30, 2009. We
are obligated to pay real estate taxes and operating costs of maintaining the
premises under the 1990 Lease.
The
current lease on the premises commenced as of September 1, 2006 and ends on
August 31, 2011 and calls for base rent in the first year of the term of
$300,000, payable monthly in the amount of $25,000. Rent is subject to an annual
increase of 3% over the term. The execution of the current lease was approved by
our Board of Directors, following the recommendation of our Audit Committee.
Under the current lease HCW is obligated to pay for utilities, repairs to the
premises, and taxes during the term.
On May 1,
2001, Hauppauge Digital Europe Sarl commenced a lease of a 15,642 square foot
building in Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland. The facility houses our European
warehousing and distribution center. The lease, which is for the standard
twenty-five year term in Ireland with the right to terminate by the lessee on
the fifth and tenth year of the lease, calls for an annual rent of approximately
$199,000. The rent includes an allocation for common area maintenance
charges.
Our PCTV
Systems operation occupies approximately 8,400 square feet in Braunschweig,
Germany. This location houses our PCTV engineering and product development
personnel. The lease expires on March 31, 2014 and calls for an annual rent of
approximately $118,000.
Our
Singapore subsidiary, Hauppauge Digital Asia Pte Ltd., occupies approximately
5,400 square feet in Singapore, which it uses as a sales and administration
office and for the testing, storage and shipping of our products. The lease
expires on November 30, 2011 and calls for an annual rent of approximately
$63,000. The rent includes an allocation for common area maintenance
charges.
Our
German subsidiary, Hauppauge Computer Works GMBH, occupies approximately 6,000
square feet in Mönchengladbach, Germany. It is used as our European sales office
and customer support center. It also has a product demonstration room and a
storage facility. Hauppauge Computer Works GMBH pays an annual rent of
approximately $55,000 for this facility pursuant to a rental agreement, which
expires on October 31, 2011.
HCW
occupies a shared office facility at the Danville Business Center in Danville,
California. We use the California office as our western region sales office. The
lease expires on May 31, 2010 and requires us to pay an annual rent, which
includes telecommunications services, of approximately $9,800.
30
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are
presently party to no pending material legal proceedings.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
PART II
ITEM
5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our
Common Stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol HAUP. The range
of high and low sales prices for our Common Stock during the two fiscal years
ended September 30, 2009 were as follows:
Year ended September 30,
2009
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
First
Quarter
|
1.16 | 0.82 | ||||||
Second
Quarter
|
1.86 | 1.01 | ||||||
Third
Quarter
|
1.40 | 1.03 | ||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
1.31 | 0.95 | ||||||
Year ended September 30,
2008
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||
First
Quarter
|
5.08 | 3.55 | ||||||
Second
Quarter
|
5.38 | 3.18 | ||||||
Third
Quarter
|
4.11 | 1.50 | ||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
1.61 | 1.10 |
We have
been advised by our transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, that the approximate number of holders of record of our Common Stock as
of December 21, 2009 was 250.
No cash
dividends have been paid during the two fiscal years ended September 30, 2009.
We have no present intention of paying any cash dividends in our foreseeable
future and intend to use our net income, if any, in our operations. Pursuant to
the terms of the Note, we and our affiliates are prohibited from declaring or
paying any cash dividend.
On
November 8, 1996, we approved a stock repurchase program. The program authorized
us to repurchase up to 850,000 shares of our own stock. The stock repurchase
program was extended by a resolution of our Board of Directors on December 17,
1997. At our August 3, 2007 Board meeting, our Board of Directors approved an
increase in the number of shares which can be repurchased under the plan to
1,200,000. There were no repurchases under the plan during fiscal
2009.
On
October 6, 2009, NASDAQ notified us that we were subject to delisting based on
our failure to timely hold our annual meeting. In accordance with NASDAQ’s
Listing Rules, we requested a hearing before a NASDAQ Hearings Panel. On
November 12, 2009, we appeared before the Panel and presented our plan to regain
compliance. On December 9, 2009, we held our annual meeting and on December 10,
2009, the Panel rendered its determination to continue our listing. The decision
of the Panel is subject to review by the NASDAQ Listing and Review Council
within 45 days following the issuance of the Panel’s written
decision.
On
November 18, 2009, we received a letter from NASDAQ indicating that we are not
in compliance with NASDAQ’s minimum bid price rule. The letter noted that, for
the thirty consecutive trading days prior to November 18, 2009, our minimum
closing bid price per share had been below the $1.00 minimum bid price
requirement set forth in NASDAQ Rule 5450(a)(1). In accordance with NASDAQ Rule
5810(c)(3)(A), we have 180 days, or until May 17, 2010, to regain compliance. In
its notice, NASDAQ indicated that, if at any time during this period the minimum
closing bid price is $1.00 or more per share for at least ten consecutive
trading days, NASDAQ will provide confirmation that we have regained
compliance.
31
Should we
fail to regain compliance by May 17, 2010, NASDAQ has advised it will then
provide a notice to us that our common stock will be delisted. However, we may
be eligible for an additional grace period if we satisfy all the requirements,
other than the minimum bid price requirement, for initial listing on the NASDAQ
Capital Market, set forth in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5505. In order to take
advantage of this alternative we will need to submit an application to transfer
our securities to the NASDAQ Capital Market.
No
assurances can be provided that we will be able to achieve or maintain
compliance with the requirements under the NASDAQ continued listing rules or
standards (including the minimum bid price rule) or that we will maintain our
NASDAQ listing.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Set forth
in the table below is certain information regarding the number of shares of our
common stock that may be issued under options, warrants and rights pursuant to
all of our existing equity compensation plans as of September 30,
2009.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
Plan Category
|
Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
|
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and
rights
|
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in the first
column)
|
|||||||||
Equity compensation
plans approved by stockholders
|
1,522,394 | $ | 3.78 | 499,325 | ||||||||
Equity
compensation plans not approved by stockholders
|
— | $ | — | — | ||||||||
Total
|
1,522,394 | $ | 3.78 | 499,325 |
ITEM
6. SELECDTED FINANCIAL DATA
Item 301
of Regulation S-K “Selected Financial Data” is not required for Smaller
Reporting Companies.
32
ITEM
7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results
of operations
Twelve
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to September 30, 2008.
Results
of operations for the twelve months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
September 30, 2008 are as follows:
Twelve
|
Twelve
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Months
|
Months
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended
|
Ended
|
Variance
|
Percentage
of sales
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
9/30/09
|
9/30/08
|
$
|
2009 |
2008
|
Variance
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
$ | 59,344,538 | $ | 89,701,028 | $ | (30,356,490 | ) | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | - | ||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
46,557,904 | 72,019,046 | (25,461,142 | ) | 78.45 | % | 80.29 | % | -1.84 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gross
Profit
|
12,786,634 | 17,681,982 | (4,895,348 | ) | 21.55 | % | 19.71 | % | 1.84 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gross
Profit %
|
21.55 | % | 19.71 | % | 1.84 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales
& marketing
|
10,634,647 | 11,630,853 | (996,206 | ) | 17.92 | % | 12.97 | % | 4.95 | % | ||||||||||||||
Sales
& marketing-PCTV
|
320,732 | 0 | 320,732 | 0.54 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.54 | % | |||||||||||||||
Technical
support
|
549,046 | 578,815 | (29,769 | ) | 0.93 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.28 | % | ||||||||||||||
General
& administrative
|
3,433,719 | 4,421,012 | (987,293 | ) | 5.79 | % | 4.93 | % | 0.86 | % | ||||||||||||||
General
& administrative-PCTV
|
266,250 | 0 | 266,250 | 0.45 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.45 | % | |||||||||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
566,127 | 0 | 566,127 | 0.95 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.95 | % | |||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative stock compensation expense
|
347,069 | 522,168 | (175,099 | ) | 0.58 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total
selling, general and administrative expense
|
16,117,590 | 17,152,848 | (1,035,258 | ) | 27.16 | % | 19.13 | % | 8.03 | % | ||||||||||||||
Research
and development
|
2,819,542 | 3,610,003 | (790,461 | ) | 4.75 | % | 4.02 | % | 0.73 | % | ||||||||||||||
Research
and development-PCTV
|
1,410,777 | 0 | 1,410,777 | 2.38 | % | 0.00 | % | 2.38 | % | |||||||||||||||
Research
and development stock compensation expense
|
191,616 | 273,744 | (82,128 | ) | 0.32 | % | 0.31 | % | 0.01 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total
expenses
|
20,539,525 | 21,036,595 | $ | (497,070 | ) | 34.61 | % | 23.46 | % | 11.15 | % | |||||||||||||
Net
operating loss
|
(7,752,891 | ) | (3,354,613 | ) | (4,398,278 | ) | -13.06 | % | -3.75 | % | -9.31 | % | ||||||||||||
Other
income :
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
14,217 | 43,989 | (29,772 | ) | 0.02 | % | 0.05 | % | -0.03 | % | ||||||||||||||
Interest
(expense)
|
(62,557 | ) | 0 | (62,557 | ) | -0.11 | % | 0.00 | % | -0.11 | % | |||||||||||||
Foreign
currency
|
670,760 | (15,138 | ) | 685,898 | 1.13 | % | -0.02 | % | 1.15 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total other income
|
622,420 | 28,851 | 593,569 | 1.04 | % | 0.03 | % | 1.01 | % | |||||||||||||||
Loss
before tax provision (benefit)
|
(7,130,471 | ) | (3,325,762 | ) | (3,804,709 | ) | -12.02 | % | -3.72 | % | -8.30 | % | ||||||||||||
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
12,550 | (237,573 | ) | 250,123 | 0.02 | % | -0.26 | % | 0.28 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (7,143,021 | ) | $ | (3,088,189 | ) | $ | (4,054,832 | ) | -12.04 | % | -3.46 | % | -8.58 | % |
Net sales
for the twelve months ended September 30, 2009 decreased $30,356,490 compared to
the twelve months ended September 30, 2008 as shown in the table
below.
Increase
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(decrease)
|
Increase
|
Percentage
of sales by
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Twelve
Months
|
Twelve
Months
|
Dollar
|
(decrease)
|
Geographic
region
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Location
|
Ended 9/30/09
|
Ended 9/30/08
|
Variance
|
Variance %
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 28,480,464 | $ | 42,964,592 | $ | (14,484,128 | ) | -34 | % | 48 | % | 48 | % | |||||||||||
Europe
|
28,932,928 | 43,810,431 | (14,877,503 | ) | -34 | % | 49 | % | 49 | % | ||||||||||||||
Asia
|
1,931,146 | 2,926,005 | (994,859 | ) | -34 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 59,344,538 | $ | 89,701,028 | $ | (30,356,490 | ) | -34 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % |
We
experienced a decrease in unit sales of about 35.83%, while changes in sales
mix, the addition of approximately $8.5 million of PCTV product line sales
and price increases increased the average sales price by about 3.10%.
Sales were impacted negatively by the closing of Circuit City, the lack of
consumer demand due to the weak global economic conditions and a weaker Euro
exchange rate.
33
Seasonal
nature of sales
As the
chart above indicates, there is a seasonal pattern to our quarterly sales.
Listed below are the primary causes of our
seasonal
sales:
|
·
|
We primarily sell through a sales
channel which consists of retailers, PC manufacturers and
distributors. Spurred on by holiday spending, our sales
during our first fiscal quarter, which encompasses the holiday season,
have historically been the highest of our fiscal
year.
|
|
·
|
For
each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 at least 40% of
our sales were generated by our European subsidiary. We typically
experience a slowdown due to the summer holiday period in Europe starting
with the second half of our fiscal third quarter and into the first half
of our fiscal fourth quarter. We also experience decreased sales in
the U.S during the summer holiday months. This has historically
caused sales for the last six months of our fiscal year to be lower
than the first six months of our fiscal year. As the chart above
indicates, our sales for the first six months of fiscal 2008 and fiscal
2009 accounted for 61% and 51% of sales, respectively, and our sales for
the last six months of fiscal 2008 and 2009 accounted for 39% and 49% of
sales, respectively.
|
Although
our strategy has been to diversify our sales to minimize the seasonal nature of
our business, we anticipate similar seasonal trends for the near term
future.
Gross
profit
Gross
profit decreased $4,895,348 for the twelve months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the twelve months ended September 30, 2008.
The
decrease in the gross profit is detailed below:
Increase
|
||||
(decrease)
|
||||
Decrease
in sales
|
$ | (8,808,350 | ) | |
Reduction
in gross profit due lower Euro exchange rate
|
(2,746,142 | ) | ||
Higher
gross profit on sales mix
|
4,731,228 | |||
Lower
production and production related costs
|
1,927,916 | |||
Total decrease in gross profit
|
$ | (4,895,348 | ) |
34
Gross
profit percentage for the twelve months ended September 30, 2009 was
21.55% compared to 19.71% for the twelve months ended September 30, 2008,
an increase of 1.84%.
The
increase in the gross profit percentage is detailed below:
|
Increase
|
|||
(decrease)
|
||||
Higher
gross profit on sales mix
|
7.77 | % | ||
Reduction
in gross profit due lower Euro exchange rate
|
-4.42 | % | ||
Higher
production and production related costs as a percentage of
sales
|
-1.51 | % | ||
Net
increase in gross profit percentage
|
1.84 | % |
The
increase in the gross profit percentage for the twelve months ended September
30, 2009 compared to the twelve months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily
due to:
|
·
|
Favorable
changes in the product sales mix, price increases and the addition of the
PCTV product line resulted in an increase in the gross profit percentage
over fiscal 2008 of 7.77%.
|
|
·
|
Due to the decrease in sales,
certain fixed and semi-fixed expenses, such as building overhead,
production labor and shipping labor increased as a percentage of sales,
causing a decrease in gross profit percentage of 1.51% compared to fiscal
2008.
|
|
·
|
A
decrease in the average Euro to USD rate from $1.5031 for fiscal 2008 to
$1.3532 for fiscal 2009 caused a decrease in the gross profit percentage
of 4.42% compared to fiscal 2008.
|
Volatility
of gross profit percentage:
The chart
above indicates the quarterly fluctuations in gross profit percentage. Over the
eight quarters ended with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the gross profit
percentage has ranged from a low of 14.97% to a high of 24.65%.
Factors
affecting the volatility of our gross profit percentages are:
·
|
Mix
of gross profit percentages: gross profit percentages vary within our
retail family of products as well as for products sold to manufacturers.
Varying sales mix of these product lines affects the quarterly
gross
profit percentage.
|
35
|
·
|
Fluctuating
quarterly sales caused by seasonal trends: included in cost of sales are
certain fixed costs, mainly for production labor, warehouse labor and the
overhead cost of our Ireland distribution facility. When unit and dollar
sales decline due to seasonal sales trends, these fixed costs get spread
over lower unit and dollar sales, which increases the product unit costs,
increases the fixed costs as a percentage of sales and lowers the gross
profit percentage.
|
|
·
|
Competitive
pressures: our market is constantly changing with new competitors joining
our established competitors. These competitive pressures from time to time
result in a lowering of our average sales prices to meet our competitors’
prices which tends to reduce gross profit
percentage.
|
|
·
|
Supply
of component parts: in times when component parts are in short supply we
have to manage price increases. Conversely, when component parts’ supply
is high we may be able to secure price
decreases.
|
|
·
|
Sales
volume: as unit sales volume increases we have more leverage in
negotiating volume price decreases with our component suppliers and our
contract manufacturers.
|
|
·
|
Cost
reductions: we evaluate the pricing we receive from our suppliers and our
contract manufacturers and we often seek to achieve component part and
contract manufacturer cost
reductions.
|
|
·
|
Mix
of sales that impacts the our obligation to pay certain licensing
costs.
|
|
·
|
Volatility
of fuel prices: increases in fuel costs are reflected in the amounts we
pay for the delivery of product from our suppliers and the amounts we pay
for deliveries to our customers. Therefore, rising fuel prices
increase our freight costs and negatively impact our gross
profit.
|
|
·
|
Volatility
of Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate. With over 40% of our sales
denominated in Euros, changes in the Euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate
impact gross profit. An increase in the Euro tends to increase our gross
profit percentage, while a decrease in the Euro tends to decrease our
gross profit percentage.
|
Managing product mix through market
strategy and new products, moderating seasonal trends, efficiently managing
shipments and achieving cost reductions are a company priority and are critical
to our competitive position in the market. Although our goal is to
optimize gross profit and minimize gross profit fluctuations, in light of the
dynamics of our market we anticipate the continuance of gross profit percentage
fluctuations.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
The chart
below illustrates the components of selling, general and administrative
expenses.
Twelve months ended
September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollar Costs
|
Percentage of Sales
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
(Decrease)
|
2009
|
2008
|
Increase
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Sales
& marketing-HCW
|
$ | 10,634,647 | $ | 11,630,853 | $ | (996,206 | ) | 17.92 | % | 12.97 | % | 4.95 | % | |||||||||||
Sales
& marketing-PCTV
|
320,732 | 0 | 320,732 | 0.54 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.54 | % | |||||||||||||||
Technical
support
|
549,046 | 578,815 | (29,769 | ) | 0.93 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.28 | % | ||||||||||||||
General
& administrative-HCW
|
3,433,719 | 4,421,012 | (987,293 | ) | 5.79 | % | 4.93 | % | 0.86 | % | ||||||||||||||
General
& administrative-PCTV
|
266,250 | 0 | 266,250 | 0.45 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.45 | % | |||||||||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
566,127 | 0 | 566,127 | 0.95 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.95 | % | |||||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative stock compensation expense
|
347,069 | 522,168 | (175,099 | ) | 0.58 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total
selling, general and administrative expense
|
$ | 16,117,590 | $ | 17,152,848 | $ | (1,035,258 | ) | 27.16 | % | 19.13 | % | 8.03 | % |
Selling,
general and administrative expense decreased $1,035,258 from the prior fiscal
year as follows.
Excluding
the PCTV expenses and amortization of intangible assets acquired in the PCTV
acquisition, selling, general and administrative expense decreased $2,188,367
from the prior fiscal year. Sales and marketing expense for HCW decreased
$966,206, primarily driven by the decrease in the Euro exchange rate compared to
the U.S. dollar, which resulted in an expense reduction of $771,666, lower
compensation expenses of $104,792 due to personnel reductions and lower
commissions and marketing development fund expense of $100,705 due to lower
sales.
36
The
decrease in general and administrative expense for HCW of
$987,293 was primarily due to lower professional fees, primarily for
legal and consulting fees, of $252,665, a decrease in bad debt
expense of $415,000 related to the February 2008 liquidation of
CompUSA and the November 2008 bankruptcy of Circuit City , a decrease in
compensation expense of $118,026 due to staff reductions and a 10% salary
reduction, a reduction of $132,501 in insurance expense due to lower
negotiated premiums, lower communication expense of $23,543 and
lower travel expense of $14,341 due to travel budget reduction. Offsetting
the expense decreases were increases of $320,732 in sales and marketing expense
and $266,250 in general and administrative expense related to personnel and
overhead expense of the PCTV business acquired at the end of December 2008 from
Avid Technology, Inc. Amortization of intangible assets was related
to intangible assets acquired in the purchase of the PCTV business from Avid
Technology, Inc.
Selling,
general and administrative expense as a percentage of sales
The chart
above indicates the quarterly fluctuations for technical support, general and
administrative, sales and marketing and total selling, general and
administrative expense. Due to fixed costs which fluctuate minimally with
changes in sales coupled with the seasonal nature of our business, selling
general and administrative expense as a percentage of sales are sensitive to
seasonal sales fluctuations. Over the eight quarters ending with the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2009, selling general and administrative expense as a
percentage of sales has resulted in the following trends:
|
·
|
Due
to our first quarter yielding the highest quarterly sales levels of our
fiscal year, our total selling, general and administrative expense as a
percentage of sales have typically been the lowest during our first
quarter. As reflected in the chart, selling, general and
administrative expense as a percentage of sales were the lowest in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008 and
2009.
|
|
·
|
Reflecting
the seasonal trend in sales, our selling, general and administrative
expense for our third or fourth quarter are the highest as a
percentage of sales. As reflected in the chart, total selling,
general and administrative expense as a percentage of sales were the
highest in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and third quarter of fiscal
2009.
|
|
·
|
Reflecting
the decline in sales, total selling, general and administrative expenses
as a percent of sales were higher for fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal
2008.
|
With the
expectation that the seasonal nature sales will continue for the near future, we
expect selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales to
reflect a future trend that is similar to the historical trends we have
experienced over the prior two fiscal years.
37
Research
and development expense
Research
and development expense increased $538,188 from the prior fiscal year as
follows:
Research
and development expense
|
||||||||||||
Fiscal 2009 increases (decreases) from fiscal
2008
|
HCW
|
PCTV
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Research
and development expense-HCW
|
$ | (790,461 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (790,461 | ) | ||||
Research
and development expense-PCTV
|
— | 1,410,777 | 1,410,777 | |||||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
(82,128 | ) | — | (82,128 | ) | |||||||
Total
research and development expense
|
$ | (872,589 | ) | $ | 1,410,777 | $ | 538,188 |
Excluding
the expense of the PCTV division, research and development expense decreased
$872,589 from the prior fiscal year. The decrease was primarily due to personnel
and personnel related reductions and the timing of development programs in
process.
Offsetting
the expense decreases were $1,410,777 in expense related to personnel and
development programs of the PCTV business acquired at the end of December
2008.
Other
income
Other
income for the twelve months ended September 30, 2009 was $622,420 compared to
other income of $28,851 for the twelve months ended September 30, 2008 as
detailed below:
Twelve months ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Interest
income
|
$ | 14,217 | $ | 43,989 | ||||
Interest
(expense)
|
(62,557 | ) | — | |||||
Foreign
currency transaction gains (losses)
|
670,760 | (15,138 | ) | |||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
$ | 622,420 | $ | 28,851 |
Lower
interest income was due to lower interest rate yields coupled with less cash
invested. Interest expense was due to payment on a note payable to Avid
Technology, Inc. Foreign currency transactions gains were due to favorable Euro
rates on forward exchange contracts.
Tax
provision
Our net
tax provision for the year ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as
follows:
Twelve months ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Income
tax benefit due to change in deferred taxes
|
$ | (164,500 | ) | $ | (529,995 | ) | ||
Tax
expense European operations
|
137,050 | 267,422 | ||||||
State
taxes
|
40,000 | 25,000 | ||||||
Net
tax (benefit) provision
|
$ | 12,550 | $ | (237,573 | ) |
Deferred
tax assets and the offsetting tax valuation allowance is primarily attributable
to the our Hauppauge Computer Works Inc. domestic operations. In evaluating the
future realization of our deferred tax asset and the corresponding valuation
allowance as of September 30, 2009, we took into consideration:
|
·
|
our
domestic operations had taxable income for three out of
the last four fiscal
years
|
|
·
|
including
royalties paid to our domestic operations by our European
subsidiary, we anticipate taxable income for our domestic
operations for fiscal
2010
|
|
·
|
our
history of utilization of prior domestic net
operating losses
|
38
After
evaluating the circumstances listed above, it was our opinion that our net
deferred tax asset of $2,185,185 is realizable as of September 30,
2009.
As a
result of all of the above items mentioned in the Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, we had a net
loss of $7,143,021 for the twelve months ended September 30, 2009,
which resulted in basic and diluted net loss per share of
$0.71 on weighted average basic and diluted shares of 10,045,449,
compared to a net loss of $3,088,189 for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2008, which resulted in basic and diluted net loss per
share of $0.31 on weighted average basic and diluted shares of
9,969,939.
Options
to purchase 1,522,394 and 1,767,744 shares of Common Stock at prices ranging
$1.05 to $8.75 and $1.08 to $8.75, respectively, were outstanding as of
September 30, 2009 and 2008 , respectively, but were not included in the
computation of diluted net income per share of Common Stock because
they were anti-dilutive.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our cash,
working capital and stockholders’ equity position is set forth
below:
As of
September 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
|
$ | 8,368,342 | $ | 14,191,721 | ||||
Working
Capital
|
5,885,577 | 17,229,410 | ||||||
Stockholders’
Equity
|
12,334,866 | 18,988,536 |
We had cash and cash equivalents as of
September 30, 2009 of $8,368,342 a decrease of $5,823,379 from September
30, 2008.
The
decrease in cash was due to:
Operating
|
Investing
|
Financing
|
||||||||||||||
|
Activities
|
activities
|
Activities
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Sources of
cash:
|
||||||||||||||||
Decrease
in inventory
|
$ | 3,669,643 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 3,669,643 | ||||||||
Increase
in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
5,556,205 | — | — | 5,556,205 | ||||||||||||
Proceeds
from employee stock purchases
|
0 | — | 29,058 | 29,058 | ||||||||||||
Decrease
in prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
164,726 | — | — | 164,726 | ||||||||||||
Total
sources of cash
|
9,390,574 | — | 29,058 | 9,419,632 | ||||||||||||
Less cash used for:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
loss adjusted for non cash items
|
(5,397,382 | ) | — | — | (5,397,382 | ) | ||||||||||
PCTV
acquisition-net of note payable
|
— | (4,506,225 | ) | — | (4,506,225 | ) | ||||||||||
Increase
in accounts receivables
|
(5,219,333 | ) | — | — | (5,219,333 | ) | ||||||||||
Effect
of exchange rates on cash
|
(78,392 | ) | — | — | (78,392 | ) | ||||||||||
Capital
equipment purchases
|
— | (41,679 | ) | — | (41,679 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
usage of cash
|
(10,695,107 | ) | (4,547,904 | ) | — | (15,243,011 | ) | |||||||||
Net
cash decrease
|
$ | (1,304,533 | ) | $ | (4,547,904 | ) | $ | 29,058 | $ | (5,823,379 | ) |
Net cash
used in operating activities was due to an increase in accounts receivable of
$5,219,333 and cash used of $5,397,562 to fund the net loss adjusted for non
cash items. Offsetting these cash decreases in operating activities was a
decrease in inventories of $3,669,643, a decrease in prepaid expenses and other
current assets of $164,726 and an increase in accounts payable and accrued
expenses of $ 5,556,205. The increase in accounts receivable was due
to 43% of the sales for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 being shipped in
September 2009 coupled with a $530,161 sales increase for the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2009 over the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. Lower fiscal 2009
sales resulted in lower inventory levels required to support sales and was the
driving force in the decrease in inventory between fiscal 2009 and fiscal
2008.
39
Cash of
$4,547,904 was used in investing activities. Of this amount, $4,506,225 was used
for the acquisition of the PCTV business and $41,679 was used to purchase fixed
assets. The $4,506,225 used for the PCTV acquisition consisted of $2,238,000
paid against the $5,000,000 purchase price, $1,874,997 in payments made pursuant
to a $2,500,000 note payable to Avid Technology, Inc and $393,228 in payments
for direct expenses of the acquisition. As of September 30, 2009, $625,045 was
left to pay on the note payable and $93,308 was left to pay for direct
acquisition costs. Cash of $29,058 from financing activities came from purchases
of stock under our employee stock purchase plan.
Our cash
requirements for the next twelve months will include, among other things, the
cash required to pay off the note to Avid Technology, Inc. related to the
purchase the PCTV business and the cash needed to fund our working capital
needs. With the proper execution of our business and operational integration
plan, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2009 and
our internally generated cash will provide us with sufficient liquidity to meet
our capital needs for the next twelve months. Failure to meet the operating and
integration plan could require the need for additional sources of capital. In
light of the current economic and credit conditions there can be no assurances
that we will be able to find external sources of financing to fund our
additional working capital needs.
On March
31, 2009 our line of credit with the JP Morgan Chase Bank expired and was not
renewed.
On
November 8, 1996, we approved a stock repurchase program. The program authorized
us to repurchase up to 850,000 shares of our own stock. The stock repurchase
program was extended by a resolution of our Board of Directors on December 17,
1997. At our August 3, 2007 Board meeting, our Board of Directors approved an
increase in the number of shares which can be repurchased under the plan to
1,200,000. As of September 30, 2009, we held 759,579 treasury shares purchased
for $2,404,337 at an average purchase price of approximately $3.17 per
share.
Sources
and (usage) of cash components
The chart
below shows our cash balances, sources of cash and (usage) of cash by quarter
for fiscal 2008 through fiscal 2009.
Our
sources and (usage) of cash primarily comes from the items listed
below:
40
|
·
|
Net
income (loss) adjusted for non cash
items
|
|
·
|
Changes
in the levels of current assets and current liabilities, primarily
accounts receivable, inventories and accounts
payable
|
|
·
|
Employee
purchases of stock options
|
|
·
|
Purchase
of capital equipment
|
|
·
|
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
Since
accounts receivable, inventory and current liabilities make up the majority of
our current asset and current liability levels, our cash balances are affected
by the increase and decrease of these assets and liabilities. In the quarters
where cash was used to increase the current asset levels or decrease the current
liability levels, there was usually a corresponding decrease or neutral position
in the cash balances during those quarters Conversely, in the quarters when we
generated cash by reducing the current asset levels or increasing the current
liability levels, there was a corresponding increase in the cash balances during
those quarters.
During
fiscal 2009, $4,506,225, or about 77% of the $5,823,379 cash decrease, was used
to fund the PCTV acquisition, the acquisition related direct costs and the
acquisition related note payable to Avid Technology, Inc.
We expect
for the near term future that our operating structure will remain similar to
past years, therefore our investment and subsequent changes in our current
assets and current liabilities required to fund our operating cycles will
continue to have a material impact on our cash generation, cash usage and cash
balances.
Line
of Credit
On March
31, 2009 our line of credit with the JP Morgan Chase Bank expired and was not
renewed.
In
addition to our operating cash requirements, our cash requirements during fiscal
2010 will include $625,000 required to pay the final three installments on the
note payable to Avid Technology, Inc. With the proper execution of our
operational plan we believe that our cash and cash equivalents as of September
30, 2009 and our internally generated cash flow will provide us with sufficient
liquidity to meet our capital needs for the next twelve months. Failure to meet
the operating plan could require the need for additional sources of capital. In
light of the current economic and credit conditions there can be no assurances
that we will be able to find external sources of financing to fund our
additional working capital needs. See “Item1.Business-Acquisiiton of PCTV Assets
from Avid Technology, Inc.”
Future
Contractual Obligation
The
following table shows our contractual obligations related to lease and note
payable obligations as of September 30, 2009:
Payments
due by period
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Less than 1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3 to 5 years
|
|||||||||||||
Note
payable to Avid Technology Inc. (1)
|
$ | 625,045 | $ | 625,045 | — | — | ||||||||||
Operating
lease obligations
|
$ | 1,812,303 | $ | 742,023 | $ | 775,590 | $ | 294,690 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,437,348 | $ | 1,367,068 | $ | 775,590 | $ | 294,690 |
|
(1)
|
See
Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for further details on
the note payable to Avid Technology,
Inc.
|
41
Effective
December 24, 2008, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of October
25, 2008, we acquired certain assets and properties of Avid Technology, Inc.,
Pinnacle Systems, Inc., Avid Technology GmbH, Avid Development GmbH, and Avid
Technology International BV. The purchase price consisted of $2,238,000 payable
in cash, $2,500,000 payable pursuant to a Promissory Note made payable by us to
Avid and the assumption of certain liabilities. The principal amount due
pursuant to the Note is payable in 12 equal monthly installments of $208,333.
The first payment was due and payable on January 24, 2009. Interest on the
outstanding principal amount of the Note is payable at a rate equal to (i) from
December 24, 2008 until the Maturity Date, five percent (5%), and (ii) from and
after the Maturity Date, or during the continuance of an Event of Default, at
seven percent (7%). Pursuant to the terms of the Note, we and our affiliates are
prohibited from (i) declaring or paying any cash dividend, or making a
distribution on, repurchasing, or redeeming, any class of stock or other equity
or ownership interest in the Buyer or its affiliates, (ii) selling, leasing,
transferring or otherwise disposing of any assets or property of the Buyer or
any of its affiliates, or attempting to or contracting to do so, other than (a)
the sale of inventory in the ordinary course of business and consistent with
past practice, (b) the granting of non-exclusive licenses of intellectual
property in the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice
and (c) the sale, lease, transfer or disposition of any assets or property
(other than the Acquired Assets) with a value not to exceed $500,000 in the
aggregate, or (iii) dissolving or liquidating, or merging or consolidating with
any other entity, or acquiring all or substantially all of the stock or assets
of any other entity. As of September 30, 2009 there was approximately $625,000
open on the note payable. See “Item 1 Business-Acquisition of PCTV Assets from
Avid Technology, Inc.”.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
We
believe the following critical accounting policies affect the significant
judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial
statements:
|
·
|
Revenue
Recognition
|
|
·
|
Management’s
estimates
|
|
·
|
Translation
of assets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies on our
European financial statements
|
|
·
|
Inventory
obsolescence and reserves
|
|
·
|
Accounts
receivable related reserves
|
|
·
|
Intangible
assets
|
Revenue
Recognition
We sell
through a sales channel which consists of retailers, PC manufacturers and
distributors. The majority of our customers are granted lines of credit. The
product is shipped on account with the majority of customers typically given 30
to 45 day payment terms. Those customers deemed as large credit risks either pay
in advance or issue us a letter of credit.
We
require the customer to submit a purchase order to us. The price of the product
and payment terms are fixed per the terms of the purchase order. Upon shipment
of the order to the customer, the title to the goods is passed to the customer.
The customer is legally obligated to pay for the order within the payment terms
stated on the customer’s purchase order. The obligation to insure the boards and
the cost of any pilferage while in the customer’s possession is the
responsibility of the customer. We sell analog, hybrid video recorders or
digital computer boards that are stocked on the shelves of retailers and are
subject to the normal consumer traffic that retail stores attract. Aside from
normal store promotions such as advertisements in the store’s circular, we have
no further obligation to assist in the resale of the products.
We offer
some of our customers a right of return. Our accounting complies with FASB ASC
605-15 (SFAS 48) Revenue Recognition when Right of Return Exists, as typically
at the end of every quarter we, based on historical data, evaluate our sales
reserve level based on the previous six months sales. Due to the seasonal nature
of the business coupled with the changing economic environment, management
exercises some judgment with regard to the historical data to arrive at the
reserve.
42
We offer
mail-in rebates on certain products at certain times as we may determine. The
rebates are recorded as a reduction to sales. We also participate in limited
cooperative advertising programs with retailers and distributors and account for
these in accordance with FASB ASC 605-50 (EITF 01-09), “Accounting for
Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the
Vendor’s Products)”.
Management’s
Estimates
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based upon our
consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The
preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates
and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts for revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates
estimates, including those related to sales provisions, as described above,
income taxes, bad debts, inventory allowances and contingencies. We base our
estimates on historical data, when available, experience, and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
combined results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Translation of assets and liabilities
denominated in non-functional currencies on our European financial
statements
The
functional currency of our European subsidiary is the Euro. In preparing our
consolidated financial statements, we are required to translate assets and
liabilities denominated in a non-functional currency, mainly U.S. Dollars, to
Euros on the books of our European subsidiary. This process results in exchange
gains and losses depending on the changes in the Euro to U.S. Dollar exchange
rate. Under the relevant accounting guidance, with the exception of
inter-company accounts which are considered long term in nature, we are
obligated to include these gains and losses on our statement of operations,
which we report in other income or expense under the caption “foreign
currency”.
The
extent of these gains and losses can fluctuate greatly from month to month
depending on the change in the exchange rate, causing results to vary widely.
Due to the past volatility of the Euro, it is difficult to forecast the long
term trend of these gains and losses.
Inventory
obsolescence and reserves
The
technology underlying our products and other products in the computer industry,
in general, is subject to rapid change, including the potential introduction of
new types of products and technologies. Due to this, we maintain a program in
which we review on a regular basis our inventory forecasting, inventory
purchasing and our inventory levels. We review our inventory realization and
inventory reserves on a quarterly basis.
Accounts
receivable and related reserves
On a
daily basis we credit approve all orders scheduled for shipment. Customers who
are over their credit limit or who have invoices that are past their due date
are typically placed on credit hold until the credit problem is resolved. Credit
reviews are performed on new customers. Existing customers who request an
increased credit line are subject to a new credit review before increases in
their credit line are approved.
Our
reserve for bad debt is done using a specific identification method. On a
quarterly basis we review the age and quality of our accounts receivable. We
reserve amounts due us from companies that have gone bankrupt or companies that
we evaluate are near bankrupt.
43
Our
products are sold through a sales channel which consist of retailers, PC
manufacturers and distributors. Our product is primarily a retail product sold
to end user consumers. Similar to other companies in the computer industry, our
products are subject to returns by the end user. In recognition that product may
be returned at a later date, at the end of every quarter, based on historical
data, we evaluate our sales reserve level based on the previous six months sales
and we adjust our sales reserve as required.
Intangible
assets
Long-lived
assets include indefinite and definite-lived intangible assets. Definite-lived
intangible assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be
recoverable through the estimated undiscounted future cash flows derived from
such assets. Definite-lived intangible assets primarily consist of covenant not
to compete, customer relationships and technology. Indefinite-lived intangible
assets primarily consist of trademarks. When an impairment exists, the related
assets are written down to fair value. Although we believe our judgments,
estimates and/or assumptions used in estimating cash flows and determining fair
value are reasonable, making material changes to such judgments, estimates
and/or assumptions could materially affect such impairment analyses and our
financial results.
Inflation
While
inflation has not had a material effect on our operations in the past, there can
be no assurance that we will be able to continue to offset the effects of
inflation on the costs of our products or services through price increases to
our customers without experiencing a reduction in the demand for our products;
or that inflation will not have an overall effect on the computer equipment
market that would have a material affect on us.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
We
adopted FASB ASC 820-01 ( SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”) (“SFAS No.
157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a methodology for measuring
fair value, and expands the required disclosure for fair value measurements. On
February 12, 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB
Staff Position No. SFAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which
amends SFAS No. 157 by delaying its effective date by one year for non-financial
assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The
adoption of SFAS No. 157 for our financial assets and financial liabilities did
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. At
September 30, 2009, we did not have any forward exchange contracts outstanding.
If we would have had forward exchange contracts outstanding their fair value at
quarter end would have been determined via inputs that included quoted prices
for similar foreign exchange contracts in active markets and were thus
considered to be Level 2 inputs under the SFAS 157 hierarchy (see Note
1-Derivative and Hedging Activities). Effective October 1, 2009, SFAS No. 157
will also apply to all other fair value measurements for us. We are evaluating
the effect the implementation of SFAS No. 157 will have on our non-financial
assets and non-financial liabilities on our consolidated financial
statements.
The
carrying amount of cash, accounts receivables and accounts payables and other
short-term financial instruments approximate their fair value due to their
short-term nature. We believe that borrowings outstanding under our note payable
approximate fair value due to the short-term duration of the loan.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance for business combinations that will
significantly change the accounting for business combinations in a number of
areas including the treatment of contingent consideration, contingencies,
acquisition costs, IPR&D and restructuring costs. The changes in deferred
tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties in a
business combination after the measurement period will impact income tax
expense. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008. We have not yet evaluated the impact, if any, of adopting this
pronouncement.
44
In
December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance for Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements. This will change the accounting and reporting
for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling
interests (NCI) and classified as a component of equity. This new consolidation
method will significantly change the accounting for transactions with minority
interest holders. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. We have not yet evaluated the impact, if any, of adopting
this pronouncement.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
Item 305
of Regulation S-K “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks”
is not required for Smaller Reporting Companies.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The
financial statements required by this Item 8 are included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K
following Item 15 hereof.
ITEM
9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM
9A (T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, after evaluating
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
paragraph (e) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
have concluded that, based on such evaluation, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the SEC's rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Internal Control over financial
reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar
functions, and effected by our board of directors, management, and other
personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Our internal control over financial reporting
includes policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii)
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of
our assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
45
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management
assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as
of September 30, 2009. Management conducted its evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the
framework in Internal Control
– Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation,
management has concluded that, as of September 30, 2009, our internal control
over financial reporting was effective.
Exclusion
of Registered Public Accounting Firm Attestation Report due to Temporary Rules
of the Securities and Exchange Commission
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public
accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission that permit the company to provide only management's report in this
annual report.
Changes
in internal control over financial reporting
There has
been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our
fourth fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER
INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The
following table sets forth the positions and offices presently held with us by
each of our directors and executive officers, his age as of September 30, 2009
and the year in which each director became a director.
Name
|
Age
|
Positions and Offices Held
|
Year Became
Director
|
|||
Kenneth
Plotkin
|
58
|
Chairman
of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Operating Officer
and Director
|
1994
|
|||
Gerald
Tucciarone
|
54
|
Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
|
||||
John
Casey
|
53
|
Vice
President of Technology
|
||||
Bernard
Herman
|
82
|
Director
|
1996
|
|||
Christopher
G. Payan
|
35
|
Director
|
2003
|
|||
Seymour
G. Siegel
|
66
|
Director
|
2003
|
46
Kenneth
Plotkin is one of our co-founders and has served as our Chairman of the
Board, Chief Executive Officer and one of our directors since our inception in
1994. He has been our President and Chief Operating Officer since September 27,
2004 and has also served in such offices from March 14, 2001 until May 1, 2002.
Mr. Plotkin served as our Secretary until June 20, 2001 and Vice-President of
Marketing from August 2, 1994 until October 16, 2005. He holds a BS and an MS in
Electrical Engineering from the State University of New York at Stony
Brook.
Gerald Tucciarone
joined us in January 1995 and has served as Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer since such time. He has served as our Secretary since July 25, 2005.
Prior to his joining us, Mr. Tucciarone served as Vice-President of Finance,
from 1985 to 1992, with Walker-Telecommunications, Inc., a manufacturer of
phones and voice-mail equipment, and from 1992 to 1995, as Assistant Controller
with Chadbourne and Parke. Mr. Tucciarone is a certified public
accountant.
John Casey
has been our Vice President of Technology since January 1995.
Bernard
Herman has served as one of our directors since 1996. From 1979 to 1993,
Mr. Herman was Chief Executive Officer of Okidata Corp. of Mount Laurel, New
Jersey, a distributor of computer peripheral products. Since then, he has served
as a consultant with reference to computer products. He is also an Arbitration
Neutral for the American Arbitration Association and the National Association of
Securities Dealers.
Christopher G.
Payan has served as one of our directors since May 16, 2003. Mr. Payan
served as the Chief Executive Officer of Emerging Vision, Inc. (“EVI”) from June
2004 through November 30, 2009 and a director of EVI from March 2004 through
November 30, 2009. From October 2001 until June 2004, Mr. Payan served as the
Senior Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer of EVI. From April 2002 until June of 2004, Mr. Payan served as
Co-Chief Operating Officer of EVI. Mr. Payan also serves on the Board of
Directors of Newtek Business Services, Inc. From March 1995 through July 2001,
Mr. Payan worked for Arthur Andersen LLP, where he provided various audit,
accounting, consulting and advisory services to various
small and mid-sized private and public companies in various industries. Mr.
Payan is a certified public accountant and holds a Bachelors of Science degree,
graduating Cum Laude, with Honors, from C.W. Post – Long Island
University.
Seymour G.
Siegel has served as one of our directors since May 16, 2003. He is a
Certified Public Accountant and since April 2000 had been a principal in the
Business Consulting Group of Rothstein, Kass & Company, P.C., an accounting
and consulting firm. From 1974 to 1990 he was managing partner and founder of
Siegel Rich and Co, P.C., CPAs which merged into Weiser & Co., LLC, where he
was a senior partner. He formed Siegel Rich Inc. in 1994, which, in April, 2000,
became a division of Rothstein, Kass & Company, P.C. Mr. Siegel has been a
director, trustee and officer of numerous businesses, philanthropic and civic
organizations. He has served as a director and member of the audit committees of
Barpoint.com, Oak Hall Capital Fund, Prime Motor Inns Limited Partnership and
Noise Cancellation Technologies Inc., all public companies. He is currently a
director and chairman of the audit committee of EVI and Air Industries Inc. He
is also a member of the compensation committee of EVI.
Family
Relationships
There is
no family relationship among any of our executive officers and
directors.
47
Term
of Office
Each
director will hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and
until his or her successor is elected and qualified or until his/her earlier
resignation, removal or death. Each executive officer will hold office until the
next regular meeting of the Board of Directors following the next annual meeting
of stockholders and until his or her successor is elected or appointed and
qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal from
office.
Audit
Committee
The Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for (i) recommending
independent registered public accountants to the Board, (ii) reviewing our
financial statements with management and the independent registered public
accountants, (iii) making an appraisal of our audit effort and the effectiveness
of our financial policies and practices and (iv) consulting with management and
our independent registered public accountants with regard to the adequacy of
internal accounting controls. The members of the Audit Committee currently are
Messrs. Herman, Payan and Siegel.
Audit
Committee Financial Expert
Our Board
of Directors has determined that we have an "audit committee financial expert"
(as defined by Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the Securities
and Exchange Commission) serving on our Audit Committee. Our audit committee
financial expert is Seymour G. Siegel. The directors who serve on the Audit
Committee are "independent" directors based on the definition of independence in
the listing standards of the National Association of Securities
Dealers.
Code
of Ethics
Our Board
of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics for our officers, directors and
employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer or controller and other persons performing
similar functions. You can obtain a free copy of our Code of Ethics by writing
to our Secretary at our offices at 91 Cabot Court, Hauppauge, New York 11788. We
intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05(c) of Form 8-K
(formerly Item 10) regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our
Code of Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal
financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons
performing similar functions and that relates to any element of the code of
ethics definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of Item 406 of Regulation S-K by
posting such information on our website, www.hauppauge.com.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section
16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Section 16”), requires
that reports of beneficial ownership of capital stock and changes in such
ownership be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Section 16
“reporting persons,” including directors, certain officers, holders of more than
10% of the outstanding common stock and certain trusts of which reporting
persons are trustees and that copies of such reports be furnished to
us.
To our
knowledge, based solely on a review of copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to
us and written representations from such persons that no other reports were
required, our officers, directors and 10% stockholders complied with all Section
16(a) filing requirements applicable to them during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009.
48
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table sets forth certain compensation information for each of the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 for our Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and two other most highly compensated executive
officers.
Name and Principal
Position
|
Fiscal
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Option Awards
($)
|
All
Other
Compen-
sation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Kenneth
Plotkin
|
2009
|
$ | 183,186 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 6,000 | (3) | $ | 189,186 | ||||||||||
President,
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Operating
Officer
|
2008
|
$ | 189,377 | $ | 91,962 | (1) | $ | — | $ | 6,000 | (3) | $ | 287,339 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Gerald
Tucciarone
|
2009
|
$ | 158,948 | $ | — | $ | — | — | $ | 158,948 | ||||||||||||
Treasurer, Chief
Financial Officer, and
Secretary
|
2008
|
$ | 164,320 | $ | 22,000 | (1) | $ | 7,448 | (2)(5) | — | $ | 193,768 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
John
Casey
|
2009
|
$ | 156,936 | $ | — | $ | — | — | $ | 156,936 | ||||||||||||
Vice
President of Technology
|
2008
|
$ | 162,240 | $ | 12,000 | (1) | $ | 24,570 | (2)(6)(7) | — | $ | 198,810 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Bruce
Willins (4)
|
2009
|
$ | — | — | $ | — | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||
Vice
President of Engineering and Product Marketing
|
2008
|
$ | 167,088 | 22,000 | (1) | $ | 9,300 | (8) | — | $ | 198,388 |
____________________________________________
(1)
|
Based
on fiscal year 2007 financial results and paid during fiscal year
2008.
|
(2)
|
Represents
the dollar amount of stock compensation expense recognized for financial
reporting purposes during the applicable fiscal year computed in
accordance with SFAS 123(R). See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2008 for a description of the assumptions used in that
computation. The actual value realized with respect to option awards will
depend on the difference between the market value of our common stock on
the date the option is exercised and the exercise
price.
|
(3)
|
Represents
non-cash compensation in the form of the use of a car and related
expenses, and payment of certain insurance
premiums.
|
49
(4)
|
Bruce
Willins resigned from his position as Vice President of Engineering and
Product Marketing of the Company on July 25,
2008.
|
(5)
|
8,000
options were granted on June 26, 2008 at an exercise price of
$1.64. The options vest to the extent of 4,000 shares on June
26, 2011 and 4,000 shares on June 26, 2012 and expire on June 26,
2018.
|
(6)
|
8,000
options were granted on December 26, 2007 at an exercise price of
$4.35. The options vest to the extent of 4,000 shares on December
26, 2009 and 4,000 shares on December 26, 2010 and expire on December 26,
2017.
|
(7)
|
5,000
options were granted on June 26, 2008 at an exercise price of $1.64.
The options vest to the extent of 2,500 shares on June 26, 2011 and 2,500
shares on June 26, 2012 and expire on June 26,
2018.
|
(8)
|
10,000
options were granted on June 26, 2008 at an exercise price of $1.64. The
options vest to the extent of 5,000 shares on June 26, 2011 and 5,000
shares on June 26, 2012 and expire on June 26,
2018.
|
Employment
Contracts
As of
January 10, 1998, following the expiration of a prior employment agreement with
us, Kenneth Plotkin entered into a new employment agreement (the "1998
Employment Agreement") with us to serve in certain of our offices. The 1998
Employment Agreement provides for a three-year term, which term automatically
renews on an annual basis, unless otherwise terminated by the Board or the
executive. The 1998 Employment Agreement provides for an annual base salary of
$125,000 during the first year, $150,000 during the second year, and $180,000
during the third year. For each Annual Period (as defined in the 1998 Employment
Agreement) thereafter, the 1998 Employment Agreement provides that compensation
shall be mutually agreed upon by the Company and the executive, said amount not
to be less than that for the preceding Annual Period.
On
January 21, 1998, pursuant to the 1998 Employment Agreement, (i) incentive stock
options to acquire a total of 90,000 shares of our common stock were granted to
Mr. Plotkin, exercisable, beginning on January 21, 1999, in increments of 33
1/3% per year at $2.544 per share, each such increment due to expire 5 years
after becoming exercisable and (ii) non-qualified options to acquire a total of
60,000 shares of common stock were granted to Mr. Plotkin, exercisable
immediately for a period of 10 years, which expired as of January 20,
2008.
The 1998
Employment Agreement provides for a bonus to be paid to Mr. Plotkin as follows:
an amount equal to 2% of our earnings, excluding earnings that are not from
operations and before reduction for interest and income taxes ("EBIT"), for each
fiscal year commencing with the year ended September 30, 1998, provided that our
EBIT for the applicable fiscal year exceeds 120% of the prior fiscal year's
EBIT, and if not, then 1% of our EBIT. The determination of EBIT shall be made
in accordance with our audited filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on our Form 10-K.
The 1998
Employment Agreement further provides for disability benefits, our obligation to
pay the premiums on a term life insurance policy or policies in the amount of
$500,000 on the life of Mr. Plotkin, owned by Mr. Plotkin or his spouse, or a
trust for their respective benefit or for the benefit of their family, a car
allowance of $500 per month, reasonable reimbursement for automobile expenses,
and medical insurance as is standard for our executives. Furthermore, the 1998
Employment Agreement provides that we may apply for, and own, life insurance on
the life of Mr. Plotkin for our benefit, in such amount as the Board may from
time to time determine; we shall pay these premiums as they become due on any
such insurance policies; and all dividends and any cash value and proceeds on
such insurance policies shall belong to us.
50
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
The
following table sets forth certain information concerning outstanding option
awards held by our named executive officers as of the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009.
OPTION
AWARDS
Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options
|
Option
Exercise
|
Option
Expiration
|
||||||||||||
Name
|
Exercisable
|
Unexercisable
|
Price ($) (1)
|
Date
|
||||||||||
Kenneth
Plotkin
|
15,400 | — | $ | 5.25 |
8/03/2010
|
|||||||||
6,920 | — | $ | 5.78 |
8/03/2010
|
||||||||||
10,000 | — | $ | 1.16 |
10/01/2011
|
||||||||||
10,000 | — | $ | 1.19 |
10/16/2012
|
||||||||||
5,000 | — | $ | 3.32 |
8/09/2014
|
||||||||||
80,000 | 120,000 | (2) | $ | 4.96 |
11/20/2016
|
|||||||||
Gerald
Tucciarone
|
10,000 | — | $ | 1.05 |
10/01/2011
|
|||||||||
22,500 | — | $ | 1.08 |
10/16/2012
|
||||||||||
20,000 | — | $ | 4.62 |
2/11/2015
|
||||||||||
10,000 | 20,000 | (3) | $ | 7.45 |
1/22/2017
|
|||||||||
8,000 | (4) | $ | 1.64 |
6/26/2018
|
||||||||||
John
Casey
|
10,000 | — | $ | 1.05 |
10/01/2011
|
|||||||||
30,000 | — | $ | 1.08 |
10/16/2012
|
||||||||||
20,000 | — | $ | 4.62 |
2/11/2015
|
||||||||||
8,000 | 8,000 | (5) | $ | 7.45 |
1/22/2017
|
|||||||||
8,000 | (6) | $ | 4.13 |
12/26/2017
|
||||||||||
5,000 | (7) | $ | 1.64 |
6/26/2018
|
(1)
|
Calculated
using the closing price of our common stock on the date of the
grant.
|
(2)
|
120,000
options vest to the extent of 40,000 shares on November 20, 2009,
40,000 shares on November 20, 2010 and 40,000 shares on November 20,
2011.
|
(3)
|
20,000
options vest to the extent of 10,000 shares on February 1, 2010 and 10,000
shares on February 1, 2011.
|
(4)
|
8,000
options vest to the extent of 4,000 shares on June 26, 2011 and 4,000
shares on June 26, 2012.
|
(5)
|
8,000
options vest to the extent of 4,000 shares on February 1, 2010 and 4,000
shares on February 1, 2011.
|
(6)
|
8,000
options vest to the extent of 4,000 shares on December 26, 2009 and 4,000
shares on December 26, 2010.
|
(7)
|
5,000
options vest to the extent of 2,500 shares on June 26, 2011 and 2,500
shares on June 26, 2012.
|
51
Termination
of Employment and Change in Control Agreements
In the
event of a termination of employment associated with a Change in Control of the
Company, as defined in the 1998 Employment Agreement, a one-time bonus shall be
paid to the executive equal to three times the amount of the executive's average
annual compensation (including salary, bonus and benefits, paid or accrued)
received by him for the thirty-six month period preceding the date of the Change
of Control.
In the
event of a Change in Control, as defined in our 1998 Incentive Stock Option
Plan, options granted to the named executive officers pursuant to said plan
shall become immediately vested and exercisable. The 1998 Incentive Stock Option
Plan further provides that options granted shall terminate if and when the
optionee ceases to be our employee or the employee of one our subsidiaries,
unless (1) the optionee shall die while in our employ or the employ of one of
our subsidiaries, in which case, the options shall be exercisable, as and to the
extent exercisable by such person or persons as shall have acquired the
optionee's rights by will or the laws of descent and distribution, but not later
than one year after the date of death and not after the expiration of the
specific period fixed in the option grant or (2) the optionee shall become
disabled (within the meaning of section 105(d)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code)
while in our employ or the employ of one of our subsidiaries and such optionee's
employment shall terminate by reason of such disability, in which case the
options shall be exercisable, as and to the extent exercisable at the time of
the termination of his employment, within such period as shall be set forth in
the option grant, but only within one year after the termination of the
optionee's employment and not after the expiration of the specific period fixed
in the option grant as in effect at the time of the termination of his
employment. In the event of a termination of employment associated with a Change
in Control, as defined in the 2003 Performance and Equity Incentive Plan,
options granted pursuant to said plan shall vest or be exercisable upon
termination of an employee’s employment within 24 months from the date of the
Change in Control, but only to the extent determined by the Board (or the
Committee, as defined in such plan), unless the employee is terminated for Cause
or the employee resigns his employment without Good Reason (as such terms are
defined in the 2003 Performance and Equity Incentive Plan).
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION FOR 2009 FISCAL YEAR
The
following table sets forth compensation paid to our non-employee directors for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009:
Name
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
|
Option
Awards
|
Stock
Awards
|
All Other
Compensation
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Bernard
Herman
|
$ | 30,900 | $ | — | (3) | — | (3) | $ | — | $ | 30,900 | |||||||||
Robert
S. Nadel (1)
|
$ | 27,450 | $ | — | (4) | — | (4) | $ | — | $ | 27,450 | |||||||||
Christopher
G. Payan
|
$ | 30,900 | $ | — | (5) | — | (5) | $ | — | $ | 30,900 | |||||||||
Neal
Page (2)
|
$ | 26,850 | $ | — | (6) | — | (6) | $ | — | $ | 26,850 | |||||||||
Seymour
G. Siegel
|
$ | 40,650 | $ | — | (7) | — | (7) | $ | — | $ | 40,650 |
During
fiscal year 2009, each of Bernard Herman, Neal Page, Christopher G. Payan and
Seymour G. Siegel, each a non-employee director, received an annual retainer of
$19,500, paid in quarterly installments in advance, and $1,500 from October 1,
2008 through April 30, 2009 for every Board meeting that he attended in
person. Effective May 1, 2009, each of the non-employee board members
received $1,350 for each board meeting that he attended in person. Dr.
Robert S. Nadel, a non-employee board member, received an annual retainer of
$15,000 and $1,500 for each board meeting that he attended through April 2009
and $1,350 for each board meeting that he attended from May 2009 through June
2009. Additionally, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, Mr. Siegel,
received an annual stipend of $9,750, and the Chairman of the Compensation
Committee, Dr. Nadel, received an annual stipend of $3,750. Effective July
1, 2009, the annual retainers paid to the non-employee board members were
reduced by 10%.
52
(1)
|
Resigned
from the Board of Directors effective June 30,
2009.
|
(2)
|
Deceased
on July 6, 2009.
|
(3)
|
As
of September 30, 2009, Mr. Herman held options to purchase 55,000 shares
of the Company’s Common Stock and had awards of 8,994 shares of the
Company’s Common Stock outstanding.
|
(4)
|
As
of September 30, 2009, Mr. Nadel held options to purchase 45,000 shares of
the Company’s Common Stock and had awards of 5,000 shares of the Company’s
Common Stock outstanding.
|
(5)
|
As
of September 30, 2009, Mr. Payan held options to purchase 25,000 shares of
the Company’s Common Stock and had awards of 5,000 shares of the Company’s
Common Stock outstanding.
|
(6)
|
As
of September 30, 2009, Mr. Page held options to purchase 25,000 shares of
the Company’s Common Stock and had awards of 5,000 shares of the Company’s
Common Stock outstanding.
|
(7)
|
As
of September 30, 2009, Mr. Siegel held options to purchase 45,000 shares
of the Company’s Common Stock and had awards of 5,000 shares of the
Company’s Common Stock outstanding.
|
ITEM
12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Security
Ownership
The
following table sets forth, to our knowledge based solely upon records available
to us, certain information as of December 21, 2009 regarding the beneficial
ownership of our shares of common stock by (i) each person who we believe to be
the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock,
(ii) each current director , (iii) each of the named executive officers and (iv)
all current executive officers and directors as a group.
Name and Address
of Beneficial Owner
|
Title of Class
|
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
Percent
of Class
|
|||||||
Kenneth
Plotkin
|
||||||||||
91
Cabot Court
|
||||||||||
Hauppauge,
N.Y. 11788
|
common
stock
|
801,955 | (1)(3)(4) | 7.97 | % | |||||
Laura
Aupperle
|
||||||||||
23
Sequoia Drive
|
||||||||||
Hauppauge,
N.Y. 11788
|
common
stock
|
705,892 | (2) | 7.02 | % | |||||
Dorothy
Plotkin
|
||||||||||
91
Cabot Court
|
||||||||||
Hauppauge,
N.Y. 11788
|
common
stock
|
551,660 | (1)(4) | 5.48 | % | |||||
John
Casey
91
Cabot Court
|
||||||||||
Hauppauge,
N.Y. 11788
|
common
stock
|
177,200 | (5) | 1.76 | % | |||||
Bernard
Herman
91
Cabot Court
|
||||||||||
Hauppauge,
N.Y. 11788
|
common
stock
|
63,994 | (6) | * | ||||||
Gerald
Tucciarone
91
Cabot Court
|
||||||||||
Hauppauge,
N.Y. 11788
|
common
stock
|
99,000 | (7) | * | ||||||
Christopher
G. Payan
91
Cabot Court
|
||||||||||
Hauppauge,
N.Y.
|
common
stock
|
30,000 | (8) | * | ||||||
Seymour
G. Siegel
91
Cabot Court
|
||||||||||
Hauppauge,
N.Y.
|
common
stock
|
50,000 | (9) | * | ||||||
All
executive officers and directors
as a group (6) persons
|
common
stock
|
1,222,149 | (1)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) | 12.15 | % |
53
* Denotes
less than 1% percent
(1)
|
Dorothy
Plotkin, wife of Kenneth Plotkin, beneficially owns 551,660 shares of our
common stock or 5.48% of the outstanding shares of common stock.
Ownership of shares of our common stock by Mr. Plotkin does not include
ownership of shares of our common stock by Mrs. Plotkin. Likewise,
ownership of shares of our common stock by Mrs. Plotkin does not include
ownership of shares of our common stock by Mr.
Plotkin.
|
(2)
|
To
our knowledge, based upon Schedule 13G filed under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and other information that is publicly available,
Laura Aupperle, the widow of Kenneth R. Aupperle, beneficially owns
705,892 shares of our common stock, or 7.02% of the outstanding shares of
our common stock.
|
(3)
|
Includes
15,400 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of
non-qualified options which are currently exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days, and 151,920 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of incentive stock options which are currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days. Does not include 80,000 shares of our
common stock issuable upon the exercise of non-qualified options which are
currently unexercisable or not exercisable within 60
days.
|
(4)
|
Does
not include 18,000 shares of our common stock owned by the Plotkins' adult
daughter. Does not include 4,000 shares of our common stock owned by the
Plotkins' adult son. Each of Mr. and Mrs. Plotkin disclaim
beneficial ownership of all such 22,000 shares of our common
stock.
|
(5)
|
Includes
80,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of incentive
stock options which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60
days. Does not include 9,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of incentive stock options which are currently unexercisable or
not exercisable within 60 days.
|
(6)
|
Includes
55,500 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of
non-qualified stock options which are currently exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days and 5,000 shares of common stock issued in lieu of options
on November 26, 2008.
|
(7)
|
Includes
72,500 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of incentive
stock options which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60
days. Does not include 18,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the
exercise of incentive stock options which are currently unexercisable or
not exercisable within 60 days.
|
(8)
|
Includes
25,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of
non-qualified stock options which are currently exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days and 5,000 shares of common stock issued in lieu of options
on November 26, 2008.
|
54
(9)
|
Includes
45,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of
non-qualified stock options which are currently exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days and 5,000 shares of common stock issued in lieu of options
on November 26, 2008.
|
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
We occupy
a facility located at 91 Cabot Court, Hauppauge, New York 11788 (the “Premises”)
and use it for our executive offices and for the testing, storage and shipping
of our products. In February 1990, Hauppauge Computer Works, Inc., one of our
wholly-owned subsidiaries (“HCW”) entered into a lease for said Premises with
Ladokk Realty Co. (together with its successor, Ladokk Realty Co., LLC,
“Ladokk”), a real estate partnership principally owned by Mr. Plotkin, the
holder of approximately 7.97% of our shares of common as of December 16, 2009;
Mrs. Plotkin, the holder of approximately 5.48% of shares of our common stock as
of December 16, 2009; and Ms. Aupperle, believed by us to be the holder of
approximately 7.02% of shares of our common stock as of December 21,
2009.
The
current lease for the Premises commenced as of September 1, 2006 and ends on
August 31, 2011. The current rent is $328,647 per annum, payable monthly, and is
subject to an annual increase of 3% during the term. The execution of the
current lease was approved by our Board of Directors, following the
recommendation of our Audit Committee. Under the current lease HCW is obligated
to pay for utilities, repairs to the premises, and taxes during the
term.
HCW has
the option to renew the current lease for an additional 5-year term, upon
written notice to Ladokk six to twelve months prior to expiration of said lease.
Rent that is due during the first year of the renewal term shall be equal to the
market rate at the end of the current lease, but not less than the rent paid
during the last year of the current lease, and is subject to increases for the
second through fifth years of the renewal term by CPI plus 1% per
annum.
The
Company did not have any unpaid rent to this related party as of September 30,
2009. The Company had $48,667 of unpaid rent payable to this related party as of
September 30, 2008. Rent expense to related parties totaled approximately
$318,270 and $312,045 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Director
Independence
Board
of Directors
Our Board
of Directors is currently comprised of Messrs. Kenneth Plotkin, Bernard Herman,
Christopher G. Payan and Seymour G. Siegel. Each of Messrs. Herman, Payan and
Siegel is currently an “independent director” based on the definition of
independence in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock
Market. Dr. Robert S. Nadel, who resigned from his position as a director of the
Company effective June 30, 2009, was an “independent director” based on the
definition of independence in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the listing standards of The
Nasdaq Stock Market. Neal Page, who was a director of the Company until his
death on July 6, 2009, was an “independent director” based on the definition of
independence in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock
Market.
55
Audit
Committee
The Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for (i) recommending
independent registered public accountants to the Board, (ii) reviewing our
financial statements with management and the independent registered public
accountants, (iii) making an appraisal of our audit effort and the effectiveness
of our financial policies and practices and (iv) consulting with management and
our independent registered public accountants with regard to the adequacy of
internal accounting controls. The members of the Audit Committee currently are
Messrs. Herman, Payan and Siegel, each of whom is an "independent" director
based on the definition of independence in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the listing
standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market.
Nominating
Committee
The
purpose of the Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors is to assist the
Board of Directors in identifying and recruiting qualified individuals to become
Board members and select director nominees to be presented for Board and/or
stockholder approval. The members of the Nominating Committee currently are
Messrs. Herman, Payan, and Siegel, each of whom is an "independent" director
based on the definition of independence in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the listing
standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market.
Compensation
Committee
The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for providing
assistance to the Board of Directors in discharging the Board of Directors'
responsibilities relating to management organization, performance, compensation
and succession, including considering and authorizing the compensation
philosophy for the Company's personnel; making recommendations to the Board of
Directors with respect to the Company's employee benefit plans; administering
the Company's incentive, deferred compensation and equity based plans; reviewing
and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to chief executive officer
and senior management compensation, evaluating chief executive officer and
senior management performance in light of those goals and objectives and, either
as a committee or together with other independent directors (as directed by the
Board of Directors), determining and approving chief executive officer and
senior management compensation based on this evaluation; and annually reviewing
and approving perquisites for the chief executive officer and senior
management.
From
October 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009, the members of the Compensation Committee were
Dr. Nadel and Messrs. Page and Herman. Dr. Nadel resigned from his position as a
director of the Company effective June 30, 2009, such that the members of the
Compensation Committee were Messrs. Page and Herman. Mr. Page passed away on
July 6, 2009, such that Mr. Herman was the sole member of the Compensation
Committee. On August 8, 2009, Mr. Siegel
became a member of the Compensation Committee, such that the members of the
Compensation Committee were Messrs. Herman and Siegel. Each of the directors who
served on the Compensation Committee during the 2009 fiscal year was an
"independent" director based on the definition of independence in Rule
4200(a)(15) of the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market. The members of
the Compensation Committee currently are Messrs. Herman and Siegel, each of whom
is an "independent" director based on the definition of independence in Rule
4200(a)(15) of the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The
following is a summary of the fees billed to us by BDO Seidman LLP, our
principal independent registered public accountants, for professional services
rendered for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008,
respectively:
56
Fee Category
|
Fiscal 2009 Fees
|
Fiscal 2008 Fees
|
||||||
Audit
Fees (1)
|
$ | 177,000 | $ | 170,000 | ||||
Audit-Related
Fees (3)
|
$ | 125,000 | — | |||||
Tax
Fees (2)
|
$ | 23,000 | $ | 26,000 | ||||
Total
Fees
|
$ | 325,000 | $ | 196,000 |
(1)
|
Audit
Fees consist of aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered
for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the interim
financial statements included in quarterly reports or services that are
normally provided by the independent registered public accountants in
connection with statutory and regulatory filings (including Form S-8) or
engagements for the fiscal years ended September
30, 2009 and September 30, 2008,
respectively.
|
(2)
|
Tax
fees consist of aggregate fees billed for tax compliance and tax
preparation for our federal and state tax filings. These fees are
related to the preparation of our federal and state tax
returns.
|
(3)
|
All
other fees consist of $106,000 in aggregate fees billed for professional
services rendered for the audit of the PCTV business of Avid Technology,
Inc., which the Company acquired on December 24, 2008, $6,000 in aggregate
fees billed for professional services rendered pertaining to a comment
letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission and $13,000 in
aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for a vat tax
matter related to our Ireland
branch.
|
The Audit
Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the
work of the independent registered public accountants and approves in advance
any services to be performed by the independent registered public accountants,
whether audit-related or not. The Audit Committee reviews each proposed
engagement to determine whether the provision of services is compatible with
maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accountants.
All of the fees shown above were pre-approved by the Audit
Committee.
PART IV
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1)
Financial Statements
The
following documents are included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K:
Page
|
||
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
F-3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Other Comprehensive Loss for the years ended September 30,
2009 and 2008
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2009
and 2008
|
F-6
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
F-7
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-8
to F26
|
(a)(2)
Financial Statement Schedules-N/A
(a)(3)
Exhibits.
57
Exhibit
|
||
Number
|
Description
of Exhibit
|
|
2.1
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated October 25, 2008, by and among Avid Technology,
Inc., Pinnacle Systems, Inc., Avid Technology GMBH, Avid Development GMBH,
Avid Technology International BV, and PCTV Corp. (16)
|
|
2.1.1
|
Buyer
Parent Guaranty, dated October 25, 2008, by Hauppauge Digital Inc. to and
for the benefit of Avid Technology, Inc., Pinnacle Systems, Inc., Avid
Technology GMBH, Avid Development GMBH, and Avid Technology International
BV (16)
|
|
2.1.2
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated December 24, 2008, by and among
Avid Technology, Inc., Pinnacle Systems, Inc., Avid Technology GMBH, Avid
Development GMBH, Avid Technology International BV, and PCTV Corp.
(20)
|
|
2.1.3
|
Secured
Promissory Note, dated December 24, 2008, made by PCTV Systems Sarl in
favor of Avid Technology, Inc. (20)
|
|
2.1.4
|
Transition
Services Agreement, dated December 24, 2008, by and among Hauppauge
Digital Europe Sarl, PCTV Systems Sarl, Hauppauge Computer Works, Inc.,
Avid Technology, Inc., Pinnacle Systems, Inc., Avid Technology GMBH, Avid
Development GMBH, and Avid Technology International BV.
(20)
|
|
2.1.5
|
Inventory
and Product Return Agreement, dated December 24, 2008, by and among Avid
Technology, Inc., Avid Technology International BV, Hauppauge Computer
Works, Inc. and Hauppauge Digital Europe Sarl (20)
|
|
2.1.6
|
Intellectual
Property License Agreement, dated December 24, 2008, by and among Avid
Technology, Inc., Pinnacle Systems, Inc. and PCTV Systems Sarl
(20)
|
|
2.1.7
|
Audited
financial statements of the PCTV Business of Avid Technology, Inc. as of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and un-audited pro forma
financial statement of operations of Hauppauge Digital Inc. and the PCTV
Business of Avid Technology, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2008.
(21)
|
|
3.1
|
Certificate
of Incorporation (1)
|
|
3.1.1
|
Certificate
of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, dated July 14, 2000
(18)
|
|
3.2
|
By-laws,
as amended to date (2),(15)
|
|
4.1
|
Form
of Common Stock Certificate (1)
|
|
4.2
|
1994
Incentive Stock Option Plan (1)
|
|
4.3
|
1996
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (7)
|
|
4.4
|
1998
Incentive Stock Option Plan (7)
|
|
4.5
|
2000
Hauppauge Digital Inc. Performance and Equity Incentive Plan
(3)
|
|
4.6
|
Hauppauge
Digital Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (4)
|
|
4.7
|
Stockholder
Rights Agreement (5)
|
|
4.8
|
2003
Hauppauge Digital Inc. Performance and Equity Incentive Plan
(6)
|
|
4.9
|
Amendment
to 2003 Hauppauge Digital Inc. Performance and Equity Incentive Plan
(12)
|
|
4.10
|
Amendment
to the Hauppauge Digital Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(13)
|
|
4.11
|
Second
Amendment to the Hauppauge Digital Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(14)
|
|
4.12
|
Third
Amendment to the Hauppauge Digital Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(12)
|
|
10.1
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of January 10, 1998, by and between Hauppauge Digital
Inc. and Kenneth Plotkin (7)
|
|
10.1.1
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement with Kenneth Plotkin, dated April 10, 2008
(19)
|
|
10.2
|
Lease,
dated February 7, 1990, between Ladokk Realty Company and Hauppauge
Computer Works, Inc. (1)
|
|
10.2.1
|
Modification
made February 1, 1996 to lease dated February 7, 1990 between Ladokk
Realty Company and Hauppauge Computer Works, Inc.
(7)
|
58
10.2.2
|
Lease,
dated February 17, 2004, between Ladokk Realty Co., LLC and Hauppauge
Computer Works, Inc. (8)
|
|
10.2.3
|
Amendment
dated October 17, 2006 to lease dated February 17, 2004, between Ladokk
Realty Co., LLC and Hauppauge Computer Works, Inc. (9)
|
|
10.3
|
Fourth
Amended and Restated Promissory Note, dated as of December 2, 2008, made
payable by Hauppauge Computer Works, Inc. to the order of JP Morgan Chase
Bank, N.A. in the original principal amount of Seven Hundred Thousand
($700,000) Dollars. (17)
|
|
10.3.1
|
Guaranty,
dated as of December 1, 2005, by Hauppauge Digital Inc. in favor of
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (11)
|
|
10.3.2
|
Share
Pledge Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2005, among Hauppauge Digital
Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Hauppauge Digital Europe Sarl
(11)
|
|
10.3.3
|
Pledge
Security Agreement, dated as of December 2, 2008, by Hauppauge Computer
Works, Inc. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (17)
|
|
14
|
Code
of Ethics, as amended to date (10)
|
|
21
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
Consent
of BDO Seidman, LLP
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule
15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
32
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
(1)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2
(No. 33-85426), as amended, effective January 10, 1995 and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
(2)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 8-K dated December 26, 2007 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(3)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-46906), and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(4)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-46910), and as an annex to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
dated September 18, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(5)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 8-K dated July 20, 2001 (File
Number 001-13550, Film Number 1685278) and as an Exhibit to the our
Registration Statement on Form 8-A12G and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(6)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-109065), and as an annex to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
dated September 18, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(7)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 10-K for the period ended
September 30, 2003 (File Number: 001-13550, Film Number: 031073457) and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(8)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2004 (File Number: 001-13550, Film Number: 04809252) and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
(9)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 8-K dated October 17, 2006 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(10)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 8-K dated August 23, 2004 (File
Number: 001-13550, Film Number: 04995501) and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(11)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 8-K dated December 6, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(12)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 8-K dated October 17, 2006 and
incorporated herein by
reference.
|
59
(13)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-46910), and as an annex to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
dated September 18, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(14)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-46910), and as an annex to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
dated September 18, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(15)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 8-K dated December 26, 2007 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(16)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 8-K dated October 25, 2008 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(17)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 8-K dated December 12, 2008 and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(18)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 10-K for the period ended
September 30, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
(19)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 8-K dated April 10, 2008, and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(20)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 8-K dated December 24, 2008, and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
(21)
|
Denotes
document filed as an Exhibit to our Form 8-K dated March 9, 2009, and
incorporated herein by
reference.
|
60
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page(s)
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-2
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
F-3
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
F-4
|
Consolidated
Statements of Other Comprehensive Loss for the years ended September 30,
2009 and 2008
|
F-5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2009
and 2008
|
F-6
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
F-7
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-8
to
F-26
|
F-1
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Hauppauge
Digital Inc. and Subsidiaries
Hauppauge,
New York
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hauppauge Digital Inc.
and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, other comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity and
cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the management of Hauppauge Digital Inc.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Hauppauge Digital Inc. and
Subsidiaries at September 30, 2009 and 2008 and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
|
BDO
Seidman, LLP
|
Melville,
New York
|
December
29, 2009
|
F-2
HAUPPAUGE
DIGITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 8,368,342 | $ | 14,191,721 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net of various allowances
|
9,770,584 | 6,932,400 | ||||||
Other
non trade receivables
|
4,116,392 | 2,316,057 | ||||||
Inventories
|
8,616,800 | 12,236,166 | ||||||
Deferred
tax asset-current
|
1,297,574 | 1,133,073 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
928,680 | 1,093,406 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
33,098,372 | 37,902,823 | ||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
4,696,102 | — | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
757,488 | 769,288 | ||||||
Security
deposits and other non current assets
|
108,088 | 102,227 | ||||||
Deferred
tax asset-non current
|
887,611 | 887,611 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 39,547,661 | $ | 39,661,949 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY :
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 12,478,625 | $ | 10,406,836 | ||||
Accrued
expenses – fees
|
5,753,546 | 5,604,485 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
8,131,263 | 4,603,858 | ||||||
Note
payable
|
625,045 | 0 | ||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
224,316 | 58,234 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
27,212,795 | 20,673,413 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders'
Equity
|
||||||||
Common
stock $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized, 10,814,042 and
10,784,717 issued, respectively
|
108,140 | 107,847 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
17,276,651 | 16,709,201 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
795,674 | 7,938,695 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(3,441,262 | ) | (3,362,870 | ) | ||||
Treasury
Stock at cost, 759,579 shares
|
(2,404,337 | ) | (2,404,337 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
12,334,866 | 18,988,536 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 39,547,661 | $ | 39,661,949 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-3
HAUPPAUGE
DIGITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years
ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 59,344,538 | $ | 89,701,028 | ||||
Cost
of sales
|
46,557,904 | 72,019,046 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
12,786,634 | 17,681,982 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
16,117,590 | 17,152,848 | ||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
4,421,935 | 3,883,747 | ||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(7,752,891 | ) | (3,354,613 | ) | ||||
Other
Income:
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
14,217 | 43,989 | ||||||
Interest
expense
|
(62,557 | ) | — | |||||
Foreign
currency
|
670,760 | (15,138 | ) | |||||
Total
other income
|
622,420 | 28,851 | ||||||
Loss
before tax provision (benefit)
|
(7,130,471 | ) | (3,325,762 | ) | ||||
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
12,550 | (237,573 | ) | |||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (7,143,021 | ) | $ | (3,088,189 | ) | ||
Net
loss per share:
|
||||||||
Basic
and Diluted
|
$ | (0.71 | ) | $ | (0.31 | ) |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-4
HAUPPAUGE
DIGITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Years ended
September 30,
|
||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss :
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (7,143,021 | ) | $ | (3,088,189 | ) | ||
Forward
exchange contracts marked to market
|
16,545 | 51,509 | ||||||
Foreign
currency translation loss
|
(94,937 | ) | (2,088,408 | ) | ||||
Other
comprehensive loss
|
$ | (7,221,413 | ) | $ | (5,125,088 | ) |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-5
HAUPPAUGE
DIGITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Common
Stock
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number
|
Additional
|
Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Of
Shares
|
Amount
|
Paid-in
Capital
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Comprehensive
Income
(loss)
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
|
10,597,002 | $ | 105,970 | $ | 15,497,703 | $ | 11,026,884 | $ | (1,325,971 | ) | $ | (2,363,505 | ) | $ | 22,941,081 | |||||||||||||
Net
loss for the year ended September 30, 2008
|
— | — | — | (3,088,189 | ) | — | — | (3,088,189 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock
compensation
|
— | — | 795,912 | — | — | — | 795,912 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
compensation-stock issued to directors
|
35,000 | 350 | 125,650 | — | — | — | 126,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
— | — | — | — | (40,832 | ) | (40,832 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of Stock Options
|
132,800 | 1,327 | 235,471 | — | — | — | 236,798 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation loss
|
— | — | — | — | (2,088,408 | ) | — | (2,088,408 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Change
in fair value of forward contracts
|
— | — | — | — | 51,509 | — | 51,509 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued through Employee Stock Purchase plan
|
19,915 | 200 | 54,465 | — | — | — | 54,665 | |||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
|
10,784,717 | $ | 107,847 | $ | 16,709,201 | $ | 7,938,695 | $ | (3,362,870 | ) | $ | (2,404,337 | ) | $ | 18,988,536 | |||||||||||||
Net
loss for the year ended September 30, 2009
|
— | — | — | (7,143,021 | ) | — | — | (7,143,021 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock
compensation
|
— | — | 538,685 | — | — | — | 538,685 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation loss
|
— | — | — | — | (94,937 | ) | — | (94,937 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Change
in fair value of forward contracts
|
— | — | — | — | 16,545 | — | 16,545 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued through Employee Stock Purchase plan
|
29,325 | 293 | 28,765 | — | — | — | 29,058 | |||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
|
10,814,042 | $ | 108,140 | $ | 17,276,651 | $ | 795,674 | $ | (3,441,262 | ) | $ | (2,404,337 | ) | $ | 12,334,866 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-6
HAUPPAUGE
DIGITAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years
ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (7,143,021 | ) | $ | (3,088,189 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
280,610 | 266,858 | ||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
566,127 | — | ||||||
Inventory
reserve
|
360,000 | 930,000 | ||||||
Bad
debt expense
|
35,000 | 450,000 | ||||||
Sales
reserve-net
|
135,537 | — | ||||||
Stock
compensation expense-employees
|
538,685 | 921,912 | ||||||
Deferred
tax benefit
|
(164,500 | ) | (529,995 | ) | ||||
Other
non cash items
|
(5,820 | ) | 7,938 | |||||
Changes
in current assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable and other non trade receivables
|
(5,219,333 | ) | 13,969,369 | |||||
Inventories
|
3,669,643 | 355,698 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
164,726 | (290,831 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable
|
1,978,439 | (10,228,301 | ) | |||||
Accrued
expenses and income taxes
|
3,577,766 | 1,922,898 | ||||||
Total
adjustments
|
5,916,880 | 7,775,546 | ||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
(1,226,141 | ) | 4,687,357 | |||||
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities:
|
||||||||
Purchase
of PCTV assets
|
(4,506,225 | ) | — | |||||
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
(41,679 | ) | (291,025 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(4,547,904 | ) | (291,025 | ) | ||||
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from employee stock purchases
|
29,058 | 291,463 | ||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
— | (40,832 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
29,058 | 250,631 | ||||||
Effect
of exchange rates on cash
|
(78,392 | ) | (2,036,899 | ) | ||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(5,823,379 | ) | 2,610,064 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
14,191,721 | 11,581,657 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of year
|
$ | 8,368,342 | $ | 14,191,721 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosures:
|
||||||||
Interest
paid
|
$ | 62,557 | ||||||
Income
taxes paid
|
$ | 60,880 | $ | 375,437 | ||||
Note
payable to Avid Technology, Inc.
|
$ | 2,500,000 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-7
1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Hauppauge Digital Inc.
(the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Hauppauge Computer Works,
Inc., HCW Distributing Corp., Hauppauge Digital Inc. Taiwan, PCTV Systems Sarl,
its branch PCTV Systems GmbH, Hauppauge Digital Europe Sarl, its branch
Hauppauge Digital Europe Sarl Ireland and Hauppauge Digital Europe Sarl’s
wholly-owned subsidiaries, Hauppauge Digital Asia Pte Ltd, Hauppauge Computer
Works, GmbH, Hauppauge Computer Works, Ltd., Hauppauge Computer Works Sarl. All
inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Nature
of Business
Hauppauge
Digital Inc. is a developer of analog and digital TV tuner products for the
personal computer market. Through its Hauppauge Computer Works, Inc., Hauppauge
Digital Europe Sarl and PCTV subsidiaries, the Company designs, develops,
manufactures and markets analog, digital and other types of TV tuners that allow
PC users to watch television on a PC screen in a resizable window, and enables
the recording of TV shows to a PCs hard disk, digital video editing, video
conferencing, and the display of digital media stored on a computer to a TV set
via a home network. The Company, incorporated in Delaware in August 1994, is
headquartered in Hauppauge, New York. The Company has administrative offices in
Luxembourg, Ireland and Singapore and sales offices in Germany, London, Paris,
The Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Singapore, Taiwan and California and
research and development centers in Hauppauge, New York, Braunschweig, Germany
and Taiwan.
.
The
Company’s products fall under three product categories:
|
·
|
Analog
TV tuners
|
|
·
|
Digital
TV tuners, and combination analog and digital TV
tuners
|
|
·
|
Other
non TV tuner products
|
The
Company’s analog and digital TV tuner products enable, among other things, a PC
user to watch TV in a resizable window on a PC.
The
Company’s other non TV tuner products enable, among other things, a PC user to
video conference, watch and listen to PC based videos, music and pictures on a
TV set through a home network, and record TV shows on a PC for playback on
portable video players.
Product
Segment and Geographic Information
The
Company operates in one business segment, which is the development, marketing
and manufacturing of analog and digital TV tuner products for the personal
computer market. The products are similar in function and share commonality of
component parts and manufacturing processes. The Company’s products are either
sold, or
can be sold, by the same retailers and distributors in the Company’s marketing
channel. The Company also sells the Company’s TV tuner products directly to PC
manufacturers. The Company evaluates its product lines
under the functional categories of analog TV tuners, digital TV and combination
digital and analog TV tuners
and other non TV tuner products. Sales by functional category are as
follows:
F-8
Twelve
months ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Product line sales
|
||||||||
Analog
sales
|
$ | 1,829,752 | $ | 10,561,536 | ||||
Digital
|
55,770,304 | 74,371,847 | ||||||
Other
non TV tuners products
|
1,744,482 | 4,767,645 | ||||||
Total
sales
|
$ | 59,344,538 | $ | 89,701,028 |
The
Company sells its product through a domestic and international network of
distributors and retailers. Net sales to international and domestic customers
were approximately 52% and 48% and 52% and 48% of total sales for the years
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Net sales
to customers by geographic location consist of:
Years ended
September 30,
|
||||||||
Sales to:
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
The
Americas
|
48 | % | 48 | % | ||||
Northern
Europe
|
7 | % | 9 | % | ||||
Southern
Europe
|
17 | % | 14 | % | ||||
Central
and Eastern Europe
|
25 | % | 26 | % | ||||
Asia
|
3 | % | 3 | % | ||||
Total
|
100 | % | 100 | % |
Net long
lived assets located in the United States, Europe and Asia locations were
approximately 55%, 38% and 7% of total net long lived assets, respectively, at
September 30, 2009, and 74%, 16% and 10% , respectively , at September 30,
2008.
Subsequent
Events
Management
has evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date through the
issuance of the financial statements for appropriate accounting and disclosure
through the December 29, 2009 filing date of this Form 10-K.
Use
of Estimates
In
preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of
America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company
reviews all significant estimates affecting the financial statements on a
recurring basis and records the effect of any adjustments when
necessary.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
For
purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid
debt instruments purchased with an original maturity date of three months or
less to be cash equivalents.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivable. At times such cash in
banks are in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. Concentration of credit risk
with respect to accounts receivable exists because the Company operates in one
industry (also see Note 10). Although the Company operates in one industry
segment, it does not believe that the Company has a material concentration of
credit risk either from an individual counter party or a group of counter
parties, due to the large and diverse user group for its products. The Company
performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not
require collateral. The Company maintains allowances to cover potential or
anticipated losses for uncollectible amounts.
F-9
Shipping
and Handling Costs
The
Company records all shipping and handling charges in Cost of Sales.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company sells through a sales channel which is comprised of retailers, PC
manufacturers and distributors. The majority of the Company’s customers are
granted lines of credit. The product is shipped on account with the majority of
customers typically given 30 to 45 day payment terms. Those customers deemed as
large credit risks either pay in advance or issue the Company a letter of
credit.
The
Company requires the customer to submit a purchase order to the Company. The
price of the product and payment terms are fixed per the terms of the purchase
order. Upon shipment of the order to the customer, the title to the goods is
passed to the customer. The customer is legally obligated to pay for the order
within the payment terms stated on the customer’s purchase order. The obligation
to insure the boards and the cost of any pilferage while in the customer’s
possession is the responsibility of the customer. The Company sells analog,
hybrid video recorders or digital computer boards that are stocked on the
shelves of retailers and are subject to the
normal consumer traffic that retail stores attract. Aside from normal store
promotions such as advertisements in the store’s circular, the Company has no
further obligation to assist in the resale of the products.
The
Company offers some of its customers a right of return. The Company’s accounting
complies with FASB ASC 605-15 (SFAS 48) Revenue Recognition when Right of Return
Exists, as typically at the end of every quarter the Company, based on
historical data, evaluates its sales reserve level based on the previous six
months sales. Due to seasonal nature of the business coupled with the changing
economic environment, management exercises some judgment with regard to the
historical data when calculating the reserve.
The
Company offers mail-in rebates on certain products at certain times as
determined by the Company. The rebates are recorded as a reduction to sales. The
Company also participates in limited cooperative advertising programs
with retailers and distributors and accounts for these in accordance with FASB
ASC 605-50 ( EITF 01-09), “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a
Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products)”.
Warranty
Policy
The
Company warrants that its products are free from defects in material and
workmanship for a period of one year from the date of initial retail purchase.
The warranty does not cover any losses or damage that occur as a result of
improper installation, misuse or neglect and repair or modification by anyone
other than the Company or its authorized repair agent. The Company accrues
anticipated warranty costs based upon historical percentages of items returned
for repair within one year of the initial sale. The Company’s repair rate of
product under warranty has been minimal and the warranty reserve has not been
material.
Inventories
Inventories
are valued at the lower of cost (principally average cost) or market. A reserve
has been provided to reduce obsolete and/or excess inventory to its net
realizable value.
F-10
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Depreciation
of office equipment and machinery and amortization of leasehold improvements is
provided for using
both accelerated and straight line methods over the estimated useful lives of
the related assets as follows:
Office
Equipment and Machinery: 5 to 7 years
Leasehold
improvements: Asset life or lease term, whichever is shorter
Income
taxes
The
Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred
income taxes are recorded to reflect the temporary differences in the tax bases
of the assets or liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial
statements. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the
Company’s financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the
financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax
rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax
assets to the amount currently estimated to be realized. The Company adopted ASC
740-10 (Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48),
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) effective October 1, 2007. Under ASC740-10 ( FIN
48), tax benefits are recognized only for tax positions that are more likely
than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount
recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50%
likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits are
tax benefits claimed in tax returns that do not meet these recognition and
measurement standards. At September 30 2009, the Company did not have any
uncertain tax positions, and the Company does not expect ASC 740-10 (FIN 48) to
have a significant impact on its results of operations or financial position
during the next 12 months. As permitted by ASC-740-10(FIN 48), the Company also
adopted an accounting policy to prospectively classify accrued interest and
penalties related to any unrecognized tax benefits in its income tax provision.
Previously, the Company’s policy was to classify interest and penalties as an
interest expense in arriving at pre-tax income.
Long-Lived
Assets
Long-lived
assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets, are evaluated for
impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of the assets may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted
future cash flows from the use of these assets. When any such impairment exists,
the related assets will be written down to fair value. In accordance with ASC
360-10-35 (SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets” ASC 360-10-35 (“SFAS No. 144”), amortization of intangible assets is
provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions: cash flow
deficits, a historic or anticipated decline in net sales or operating profit,
adverse legal or regulatory developments, accumulation of costs significantly in
excess of amounts originally expected to acquire the asset, and a material
decrease in the fair market value of some or all of the assets. Assets are
grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are
largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset
groups.
Research
and Development
Expenditures
for research and development are charged to expense as
incurred.
F-11
Foreign
Currency Translations and Transactions
The
Company’s Asian subsidiary reports its financial position and results of
operations in the reporting currency of the Company.
The
financial position and results of operations of the Company’s European
subsidiaries are determined using Euros as the functional currency. Assets and
liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at the exchange rate in effect
at each period end. Income statement accounts are translated at the average rate
during the year. Translation
adjustments arising from the translation to U.S. Dollars at differing exchange
rates are included in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) account
in stockholders’ equity. Gains and losses resulting from transactions that are
denominated in currencies other than Euros are included in earnings as a
component of other income. The Company had a translation loss of $3,346,325
recorded on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2008. For the twelve months
ended September 30, 2009 the Company recorded on the balance sheet translation
losses of $94,937, resulting in an accumulated translation loss of $3,441,262
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income as of
September 30, 2009.
Derivatives
and Hedging Activities
For each
of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, at least 40 % of the
Company’s sales were generated by its European subsidiary and were invoiced and
collected in local currency, which was primarily the Euro. On the supply side,
since the Company predominantly deals with North American and Asian suppliers
and contract manufacturers, approximately 95% of the Company’s inventory
required to support its European sales are purchased and paid in U.S. Dollars.
The combination of sales billed in Euros supported by inventory purchased in
U.S. dollars results in an absence of a natural local currency hedge.
Consequently, the Company’s financial results are subject to market risks
resulting from the fluctuations in the Euro to U.S. Dollar exchange
rates.
The
Company attempts to reduce these risks by entering into foreign exchange forward
contracts with financial institutions. The purpose of these forward contracts is
to hedge the foreign currency market exposures underlying the U.S. Dollar
denominated inventory purchases required to support its European
sales.
The
Company does not try to hedge against all possible foreign currency exposures
because of the inherent difficulty in estimating the volatility of the Euro. The
contracts the Company procures are specifically entered into to as a hedge
against forecasted or existing foreign currency exposure. The Company does not
enter into contracts for speculative purposes. Although the Company maintains
these programs to reduce the short term impact of changes in currency exchange
rates, long term strengthening or weakening of the U.S. Dollar against the Euro
impacts the Company’s sales, gross profit, operating income and retained
earnings. Factors that could impact the effectiveness of the Company’s hedging
program are:
|
·
|
volatility
of the currency markets
|
|
·
|
availability
of hedging instruments
|
|
·
|
accuracy
of the Company’s inventory
forecasts
|
Additionally,
there is the risk that foreign exchange fluctuations will make the Company’s
products less competitive in foreign markets, which would substantially reduce
the Company’s sales.
Due to
the rapid upward spike of the Euro compared to the U.S. dollar, the Company
chose not to invest in any forward exchange contracts during the Company’s
fourth fiscal quarter. As of September 30, 2009 the Company had no open
contracts outstanding. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had foreign
currency contracts outstanding of approximately $14,359,000 against the delivery
of the Euro. These contracts expired each month through February
2009.
F-12
The
Company’s accounting policies for these instruments designate such instruments
as cash flow hedging transactions. The Company does not enter into such
contracts for speculative purposes. The Company records all derivative gains and
losses on the balance sheet as a component of stockholders’ equity under the
caption “Accumulated other comprehensive loss,” which amounted to losses of $0
and $16,545 as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
carrying amounts of certain financial instruments, including cash, receivables
and accounts payable, approximate fair value as of September 30, 2009 and 2008
because of the relatively short term maturity of these instruments. The Company
believes that borrowings outstanding under its note payable approximate fair
value due to the short-term duration of the loan.
Net
income (loss) per share
Basic net
income (loss) per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net
income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock
outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share
reflect, in periods in which they have a dilutive effect, the dilution which
would occur upon the exercise of stock options. A reconciliation of the shares
used in calculating basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
follows:
Years
ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Weighted
average Common Stock outstanding-basic
|
10,045,449 | 9,969,939 | ||||||
Common
Stock equivalents-stock options
|
— | — | ||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding-diluted
|
10,045,449 | 9,969,939 |
Options
to purchase 1,522,394 and 1,767,744 shares of Common Stock at prices ranging
$1.05 to $8.75 and $1.08 to $8.75, respectively, were outstanding as of
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, but were not included in the
computation of diluted net income per share of Common Stock because they were
anti-dilutive.
Stock
Based Compensation
The
Company follows FASB ASC-718 (SFAS No. 123R), “Share-Based Payments” where the
fair value of stock options are determined using the Black-Scholes valuation
model and such fair value is recognized as an expense over the service period,
net of estimated forfeitures.
The
Company had as of September 30, 2009 options issued from four incentive option
plans and one non qualified option plan. These options typically vest over a
period of four to five years. Options granted have a contract term of 10 years
and the fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions based on historical data of the Company’s stock
Stock option grant
assumptions:
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Weighted
average fair value of grants
|
$ | 0.70 | $ | 1.02 | ||||
Risk
free interest rate
|
4.25 | % | 4.25 | % | ||||
Dividend
yield
|
— | — | ||||||
Expected
volatility
|
50 | % | 50 | % | ||||
Expected
life in years
|
7 | 7 |
F-13
As of
September 30, 2009, there was $830,226 of total unrecognized compensation
expense net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested share based
compensation arrangements which is expected to be recognized over a weighed
average period of 3.75 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the
years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $538,685 and $795,912. For September
30, 2009 and 2008, stock compensation expense of $347,069 and $522,168 have been
recorded to SG&A expense and $191,616 and $273,744 have been recorded to
research and development expense.
In
recognition that stock compensation is a non-cash expense, the effect of
expensing options had no affect on the Company’s cash flow. However, it was
reflected in the Company’s cash flow statement as a non-cash item which was
added back in the determination of cash flows from operating
activities.
A summary
of the Company’s non-vested shares as of September 30, 2009 and changes during
the twelve months ended September 30, 2009 is presented below:
Weighted
|
||||||||
Grant
date
|
||||||||
Shares
|
Fair value
|
|||||||
Non-vested
as of October 1, 2008
|
621,143 | $ | 2.76 | |||||
Granted
|
95,000 | 0.70 | ||||||
Vested
|
(153,000 | ) | 2.75 | |||||
Forfeited
|
(98,143 | ) | 1.05 | |||||
Non-vested
as of September 30, 2009
|
465,000 | $ | 2.70 |
Accrued
expenses- fees
The
Company uses technology licensed from third parties in certain products.
The Company enters into agreements to license this technology, and in return for
the use of the technology, the Company incurs a license fee for each unit sold
that includes the licensors’ technology. The licensing amount per unit varies by
licensor. The Company is obligated to provide the licensor with reports
which quantify the licenses used. The licensing fees are accounted for as a
component of product cost and are charged to cost of sales.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
The
Company adopted FASB ASC 820-10 (SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”) (“SFAS
No. 157”) on October 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
methodology for measuring fair value, and expands the required disclosure for
fair value measurements. On February 12, 2008, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position No. SFAS 157-2, “Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which amends SFAS No. 157 by delaying its
effective date by one year for non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 for
the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities did not have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements. At September 30, 2009 the
Company did not have any forward contracts outstanding. If the Company would
have had forward exchange contracts outstanding their fair value at quarter end
would have been determined via inputs that included quoted prices for similar
foreign exchange contracts in active markets and were thus considered to be
Level 2 inputs under the SFAS 157 hierarchy (see Note 1-Derivatives and Hedging
Activities). Effective October 1, 2009, SFAS No. 157 will also apply to all
other fair value measurements for the Company. The Company is evaluating the
effect the implementation of SFAS No. 157 will have on its non-financial assets
and non-financial liabilities on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance for business combinations that will
significantly change the accounting for business combinations in a number of
areas including the treatment of contingent consideration, contingencies,
acquisition costs, IPR&D and restructuring costs. The changes in deferred
tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties in a
business combination after the measurement period will impact income tax
expense. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008. The adoption of this accounting pronouncement will affect future
acquisitions, if any.
F-14
In
December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance for Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements. This will change the accounting and
reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as
noncontrolling interests (NCI) and classified as a component of equity.
This new consolidation method will significantly change the accounting for
transactions with minority interest holders. This guidance is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company has
not yet evaluated the impact, if any, of adopting this
pronouncement.
Reclassifications
Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated financial
statements to conform to the current year presentation.
2.
Accounts
receivable
Receivables
consist of:
|
·
|
Trade
receivables from sales to customers
|
|
·
|
Receivables
pertaining to component parts purchased from the Company by its contract
manufacturers which are excluded from
sales
|
|
·
|
General
services tax (GST) and value added tax (VAT) reclaimable on goods
purchased by the Company’s Asian and European
locations
|
|
·
|
Allowances,
consisting of sales and bad debt
|
|
·
|
Other
minor non trade receivables
|
The
following is a listing by category of the Company’s accounts receivable as of
September 30, 2009 and 2008.
As
of
September
30,
|
||||||||
Receivable detail:
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Trade
receivables
|
$ | 13,893,804 | $ | 11,668,214 | ||||
Allowances
and reserves
|
(4,123,220 | ) | (4,735,814 | ) | ||||
Net
trade receivables
|
9,770,584 | 6,932,400 | ||||||
Receivable
from contract manufacturers
|
2,933,918 | 1,795,225 | ||||||
GST
and VAT taxes receivables
|
1,134,331 | 484,086 | ||||||
Other
|
48,143 | 36,746 | ||||||
Total
other non trade receivables
|
$ | 4,116,392 | $ | 2,316,057 |
3.
Inventories
Inventories
consist of the following:
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Component
Parts
|
$ | 2,799,723 | $ | 4,561,140 | ||||
Finished
Goods
|
5,817,077 | 7,675,026 | ||||||
$ | 8,616,800 | $ | 12,236,166 |
4.
Property, Plant and Equipment
The
following is a summary of property, plant and equipment:
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Office
Equipment and Machinery
|
$ | 3,780,398 | $ | 3,492,520 | ||||
Leasehold
Improvements
|
115,870 | 115,870 | ||||||
3,896,268 | 3,608,390 | |||||||
Less:
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(3,138,780 | ) | (2,839,102 | ) | ||||
$ | 757,488 | $ | 769,288 |
F-15
Depreciation
and amortization expense totaled $ 280,610 and $ 266,858 for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
5.
Intangible Assets
The
following is a summary of intangible assets as of September 30,
2009
Net
|
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||||
Purchase
|
Accumulated
|
Book
|
average remaining
|
|||||||||||||
Asset description
|
cost
|
Amortization
|
Value
|
life (in years)
|
||||||||||||
Customer
relationships
|
$ | 1,644,353 | $ | (102,772 | ) | $ | 1,541,581 | 11.25 | ||||||||
Value
of technology
|
1,849,897 | (198,203 | ) | 1,651,694 | 6.25 | |||||||||||
Covenant
not to compete
|
1,767,979 | (265,152 | ) | 1,502,827 | 4.25 | |||||||||||
Total
intangible assets
|
$ | 5,262,229 | $ | (566,127 | ) | $ | 4,696,102 | 8.45 |
Amortization
expense totaled $566,127 for the year ended September 30, 2009. The Company had
no intangible assets for the year ended September 30, 2008. Amortization expense
is expected to be approximately $755,000 for each of the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, and $490,000 for the year
ended September 30, 2014.
6.
Accrued Expenses –Fees
The
Company recognizes and estimates the amount of licensing fees owed to third
parties based on products sold that include software and technology licensed
from these third parties. For fiscal 2009 $2,694,648 in fees were charged to
cost of sales and $2,545,587 in fees were paid to various third parties. For
fiscal 2008 $3,169,649 in fees were charged to cost of sales and $2,274,559 in
fees were paid to various third parties.
During
fiscal year 2008, the Company identified $1,462,661 of license accrual amounts
that were no longer owed to third parties. Certain amounts should have been
adjusted in a prior year, however no such adjustments were made in that prior
year. As a result, the Company recorded a correction of an error in the first
quarter of 2008, which resulted in a decrease to Accrued Expenses - fees and a
decrease to cost of sales of approximately $273,000. This adjustment was a
correction to a period prior to those presented herein. The Company did not deem
this adjustment to be material to any prior years based upon both quantitative
and qualitative factors. This matter was not corrected for periods prior to
October 1, 2008 due to the immateriality of the effects of this in earlier
years. In addition the Company reduced its Accrued Expenses – fees by
approximately $1,190,000 due to a change in the Company’s estimate during fiscal
2008. The Company did not record any such change in estimates during fiscal
2009.
7.
Accrued Expenses
Accrued
expenses are for costs incurred for goods and services which are based on
estimates, charged as incurred to operations as period costs and for which no
invoice has been rendered. Included in accrued expenses are accruals for product
costs of $4,995,109 and $2,347,759 as of September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively; accruals for sales costs relating to a sales rebate program of
$1,104,992 at September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively; accruals for freight
and duty expenses of $1,020,432 and $348,164 at September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively;, accruals for compensation costs of $343,925 and $269,916 at
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively; accruals for warranty repair costs of
$283,507 and $24,101 at September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and accruals
for advertising and marketing costs of $294,942 and $300,253, at September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
F-16
8.
Income Taxes
The
Company’s income tax provision consists of the following:
Years
ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Current
tax expense:
|
||||||||
State
income taxes
|
$ | 40,000 | $ | 25,000 | ||||
Foreign
income taxes
|
137,050 | 267,422 | ||||||
Total
current tax expense
|
177,050 | 292,422 | ||||||
Deferred
tax (benefit)
|
||||||||
Federal
|
(147,184 | ) | (474,206 | ) | ||||
State
|
(17,316 | ) | (55,789 | ) | ||||
Total
tax provision (benefit)
|
$ | 12,550 | $ | (237,573 | ) |
Components
of deferred taxes
are as follows:
Years
ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
operating loss domestic
|
$ | 388,989 | $ | — | ||||
Net
operating loss foreign
|
475,693 | 475,693 | ||||||
Sales
reserve
|
328,119 | 380,764 | ||||||
Inventory
obsolescence
|
705,932 | 874,000 | ||||||
Allowance
for bad debts
|
312,824 | 338,200 | ||||||
Vacation
accrual
|
24,588 | 24,588 | ||||||
Warranty
reserve
|
9,158 | 9,158 | ||||||
263
A inventory capitalization
|
115,650 | 83,517 | ||||||
Depreciation
|
14,822 | 4,834 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
114,856 | 135,376 | ||||||
AMT
credit
|
170,247 | 170,247 | ||||||
R&D
credit
|
407,971 | 407,971 | ||||||
Subtotal
|
3,068,849 | 2,904,348 | ||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(883,664 | ) | (883,664 | ) | ||||
Net
deferred tax assets
|
$ | 2,185,185 | $ | 2,020,684 |
Deferred
tax assets and the offsetting tax valuation allowance is primarily attributable
to the Company’s Hauppauge Computer Works Inc. domestic operations. In
evaluating the future realization of the Company’s deferred tax asset and the
corresponding valuation allowance as of September 30, 2009, the Company took
into consideration:
|
·
|
the
Company’s domestic operations had taxable income for three out of the last
four fiscal years
|
|
·
|
including
royalties paid to the Company’s domestic operations by the Company’s
European subsidiary, the Company anticipates taxable income for its
domestic operations for fiscal 2010
|
|
·
|
the
Company’s history of utilization of prior domestic net operating
losses
|
After
evaluating the circumstances listed above, it was the Company’s opinion that its
net deferred tax asset net of $2,185,185 is realizable as of September 30,
2009.
As of
September 30, 2008, the Company had utilized all of the Company’s unrestricted
domestic net operating losses. As of September 30, 2009, the Company has
$1,023,655 in unrestricted domestic net operating losses. As of September 30,
2009 the Company had tax credit carry forwards for research and development
expenses totaling $408,000 (which expire between 2010 and 2014) which have a
full valuation allowance recorded against them.
F-17
No
provision has been made for income taxes on substantially all of the
undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries of approximately
$2,672,177 at September 30, 2009 as the Company intends to indefinitely reinvest
such earnings.
The
difference between the actual income tax provision (benefit) and the tax
provision (benefit) computed by applying
the Federal statutory income tax rate of 34% to the income before income tax is
attributable to the following:
Years
ended
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Income
tax expense at federal statutory rate
|
$ | (2,424,360 | ) | (1,130,759 | ) | |||
Change
in estimate of prior year income taxes
|
(178,025 | ) | 79,438 | |||||
Permanent
differences-life insurance
|
1,700 | 1,360 | ||||||
Permanent
differences-compensation expense
|
183,153 | 270,610 | ||||||
Permanent
differences-other
|
1,190 | 1,700 | ||||||
State
income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
9,084 | (39,289 | ) | |||||
Foreign
earnings taxed at rates other than the federal statutory
rate
|
2,430,294 | 544,782 | ||||||
Other
|
(10,486 | ) | 34,585 | |||||
Taxes
(benefit) on income (loss)
|
$ | 12,550 | $ | (273,573 | ) |
The
Company’s Luxembourg corporation functions as the entity which services the
Company’s European customers. The Company has separate domestic and foreign tax
entities, with the Luxembourg entity paying a royalty fee to the Company’s
domestic operation for use of the Hauppauge name.
Net of
royalty fees charged to the Company’s European subsidiary, the Company’s
domestic operation incurred pretax income of $406,646 for the year ended
September 30, 2009 and a pretax loss of $2,509,998 for the year ended September
30, 2008. The Company’s international operations had pretax net income
(loss) net of royalty fees of $(7,537,116) and $(815,764) for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008.
9.
Stockholders’ Equity
a.
Treasury Stock
The
Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program which allows
for the repurchase of 1,200,000 shares under the plan. As of September 30, 2009,
the Company held 759,579 treasury shares purchased for $2,404,337 at an average
purchase price of approximately $3.17 per share
b.
Stock Compensation Plans
In August
1994, the Company adopted an Incentive Stock Option Plan ("ISO"), as defined in
section 422(A) of the Internal Revenue Code. Pursuant to the ISO 400,000 options
may be granted for up to ten years. The plan has expired and no further options
can be granted under this plan. As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, 32,267
and 33,867 options were outstanding, respectively, ranging in prices from $1.35
to $2.54.
On
December 14, 1995, the Board of Directors authorized the adoption of the 1996
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the "1996 Non-Qualified Plan") which was
approved by the Company’s stockholders on March 5, 1996. The 1996
Non-Qualified Plan authorizes the grant of 500,000 shares of Common Stock,
subject to adjustment as provided in the plan. The plan expired on March 5, 2006
and no more options can be issued under this plan. This plan
does not qualify for treatment as an incentive stock option plan under the
Internal Revenue Code . As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, 181,400 and 186,975
options ranging in prices from $1.08 to $4.13 were outstanding under the 1996
Non-Qualified Plan.
F-18
On
December 17, 1997, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted and authorized a new
incentive stock option plan (“1997 ISO”) pursuant to section 422A of the
Internal Revenue Code. This plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders at
the Company’s March 12, 1998 annual stockholders’ meeting. The 1997 ISO plan as
adopted authorizes the grant of up to 700,000 shares of Common Stock, subject to
adjustment as provided in the plan. This plan terminated on December 16, 2007
and no further options can be issued under this plan. As of September 30, 2009
and 2008, 168,360 and 270,610 options were outstanding with exercise prices from
$1.08 to $ 8.75.
The
Company’s Board of Directors, on May 9, 2000, adopted the 2000 Performance and
Equity Incentive Plan (the “2000 Plan”). This plan was approved by the
stockholders at the Company’s July 18, 2000 annual stockholders’ meeting. The
purpose of the 2000 Plan is to attract, retain and motivate key employees,
directors and non-employee consultants.
The 2000
Plan as adopted reserves 500,000 shares of Common Stock to be issued pursuant to
stock options grants or other awards, subject to adjustment for any merger,
reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization, stock dividend, stock split or
any other changes on corporate structure affecting the Common Stock. This plan
is to be
administered by the Board of Directors. Grants of awards to non-employee
directors require the approval of the
Board of Directors.
The 2000
plan allows the granting of options as either incentive stock options or
non-qualified options. Non-employee directors and non-employee consultants may
only be granted Non-Qualified Stock Options. Incentive stock options are priced
at the market value at the time of grant and shall be exercisable no more than
ten years after the date of the grant. Incentive stock options granted to
employees who own 10% or more of the Company’s combined voting power cannot be
granted at less than 110% of the market value at the time of grant.
Non-qualified options shall be granted at a price determined by the Board of
Directors, or a committee thereof, and shall be exercisable no more than 10
years and one month after the grant. The aggregate fair market value of shares
subject to an incentive stock option granted to an optionee in any calendar year
shall not exceed $100,000. As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, 188,867 and
202,667 options were outstanding from this plan ranging in prices from $1.05 to
$ 5.78.
The
Company’s Board of Directors on May 16, 2003 adopted the 2003 Performance and
Equity Incentive Plan (the
“2003 Plan”). This plan was approved by the stockholders at the Company’s
September 22, 2003 annual stockholders’ meeting. The purpose of the 2003 Plan is
to provide equity ownership opportunities and performance based incentives to
attract and retain the services of key employees, Directors and non-employee
consultants of the Company and to motivate such individuals to put forth maximum
efforts on behalf of the Company.
The 2003
Plan as adopted reserves up to 500,000 shares of Common Stock to be issued
pursuant to stock options grants or other awards, subject to adjustment for any
merger, reorganization, consolidation, recapitalization,
stock dividend, stock split or any other changes on corporate structure
affecting the Common Stock.
All of the Common Stock which may be awarded under the 2003 Plan may be subject
to delivery through
Incentive Stock Option Plans. The 2003 Plan will be administered by the Board of
Directors or a Committee thereof composed of two or more members who are
non-employee Directors (the “Committee”). Grants of awards under the 2003 Plan
to non-employee Directors require the approval of the Board of Directors. On
September 5, 2006 the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment which
increased the number of shares
of Common Stock authorized and reserved for issuance under the plan by an
additional 1,000,000 shares. The amendment was approved by the Company’s
stockholders at the Company’s October 17, 2006 Annual Stockholders
Meeting.
F-19
The Board
or the Committee may amend, suspend or discontinue the 2003 Plan or any portion
thereof at any time, but no amendment, suspension or discontinuation shall be
made which would impair the right of any holder without the holder’s consent.
Subject to the foregoing, the Board or the Committee has the authority to amend
the 2003 Plan to take into account changes in law and tax and accounting rules,
as well as other developments. The Board or the Committee may institute loan
programs to assist participants in financing the exercise
of options through full recourse interest bearing notes not to exceed the cash
consideration plus all applicable taxes in connection with the acquisition of
shares.
This plan
allows the granting of options as either incentive stock options or
non-qualified options. Non-employee directors and non-employee consultants may
only be granted Non-Qualified Stock Options. Incentive stock options are priced
at the market value at the time of grant and shall be exercisable no more than
ten years after the date of the grant. Incentive stock options granted to
employees who own 10% or more of the Company’s combined voting power cannot be
granted at less than 110% of the market value at the time of grant.
Non-qualified options shall be granted at a price determined by the Board of
Directors and shall be exercisable no more than 10 years and one month after the
grant. The aggregate fair market value of shares subject to an incentive stock
option granted to an optionee in any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000.
Any fair value at the time of grant that exceeds $100,000 in any calendar year
will not be deemed as incentive stock options. As of September 30, 2009 and
2008, 951,500 and 1,073,625 were outstanding from this plan ranging in prices
from $1.24 to $ 7.45.
The Board
or the Committee may grant options with a reload feature. A reload feature shall
only apply when the option price is paid by delivery of Common Stock held by the
optionee for at least 12 months. The agreement for options containing the reload
feature shall provide that the option holder shall receive, contemporaneously
with the payment of the option price in Common Stock, a reload stock option to
purchase the number of Common Stock equal to the number of Common Stock used to
exercise the option, and, to the extent authorized by the Board or the
Committee, the number of Common Stock used to satisfy any tax withholding
requirement incident to the underlying Stock Option. The exercise price of the
reload options shall be equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on
the date of grant of the reload option and each reload option shall be fully
exercisable six months from the effective date of the grant of such reload
option. The term of the reload option shall be equal to the remaining term of
the option which gave rise to the reload option. No additional reload options
shall be granted to optionees when Stock Options are exercised following the
termination of the optionee’s employment. Subject to the foregoing, the terms of
the 2003 Plan applicable to the option shall be equally applicable to the reload
option.
Stock
Appreciation Rights may be granted in conjunction with all or part of any stock
option granted under the 2003 Plan or independent of a stock option grant. Stock
Appreciation Rights shall be subject to such terms and conditions as shall be
determined by the Board or the Committee. Upon the exercise of a Stock
Appreciation Right, a holder shall be entitled to receive an amount in cash,
Common Stock, or both, equal in value to the excess of the fair market value
over the option exercise price per Common Stock. Shares of Restricted Stock may
also be issued either alone or in addition to other amounts granted under the
2003 Plan. The Board or the
Committee shall determine the officers, key employees and non-employee
consultants to whom and the time or times at which grants of Restricted Stock
will be made, the number of shares to be awarded, the time or times within which
such awards may be subject to forfeiture and any other terms and conditions of
the awards. Long term performance awards (or “Award) may be awarded either alone
or in addition to other awards granted under the 2003 Plan. The Board or the
Committee shall determine the nature, length, and starting date of the
performance period which shall generally be at least two years. The maximum
award for any individual with respect to any one year of any applicable
performance period shall be 100,000 shares of Common
Stock.
Upon a
Change in Control as defined in the 2003 Plan, but only to the extent determined
by the Board or the Committee, stock options, stock appreciation rights and long
term performance awards (the “Award”) will vest, provided that no award granted
to an employee of the Company shall vest or be exercisable unless the employee’s
employment is terminated within 24 months from the date of the Change in
Control, (as defined in the 2003 Plan) unless the employee is terminated for
Cause, as defined in the 2003 Plan or if the employee resigns his employment
without Good Reason, as defined in the 2003 Plan. Otherwise, the Award shall not
vest and be exercisable upon a Change in Control, unless otherwise determined.
The employee shall have 30 days from after his employment is terminated due to a
Change in Control to exercise all unexercised Awards. However, in the event of
the death or disability of the employee, all unexercised Awards must be
exercised within twelve (12) months after the death or disability of the
employee.
F-20
The
Company’s Board of Directors on May 9, 2000 adopted the Employee Stock Purchase
Plan. This plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders’ at the Company’s
July 18, 2000 annual stockholders’ meeting. This plan is intended to provide the
Company’s full- time employees an opportunity to purchase an ownership interest
in the Company through the purchase of Common Stock. The Company had reserved
100,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the plan. This plan is to be
administered by the Board of Directors. Employees who have completed six months
of employment and who work more than 20 hours per week for more than five months
in the year are eligible to participate in the plan. The employee may elect to
payroll deductions
up to 10% per pay period. The purchase price shall either be the lower of 85% of
the closing price on the offering commencement date or the offering termination
date. No employee will be granted an option to purchase
shares of Common Stock if such employee would own shares or holds options to
purchase shares which would cause the employee to own more than 5% of the
combined voting power of all classes of stock. Non-employees are not eligible to
participate. The plan’s initial termination date was December 31, 2003. The
maximum
number of shares that may be issued in any quarterly offering is 10,000, plus
un-issued shares from prior offerings whether offered or not. At the Company’s
September 6, 2002 stockholders’ meeting, the Company’s stockholders’ approved an
increase in shares reserved under this plan to 180,000, and extended the
plan
termination date to December 31, 2004. At the Company’s September 27, 2004
stockholders’ meeting the Company’s stockholders’ approved an increase in shares
reserved under this plan to 260,000, and extended the plan termination date to
December 31, 2006. On May 25, 2006 the Company’s Board of Directors approved
a third amendment to the plan increasing the number of shares available to
420,000 and extending the expiration
date of the plan to December 31, 2010. The amendment was approved by the
Company’s stockholders’ at the Company’s October 17, 2006 annual stockholders’
meeting. As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, 204,289 and 175,324 shares of Common
Stock were purchased under this plan.
A summary
of the of the Company’s fixed options plans as of September 30, 2009 and 2008
and changes during the years ending those dates is presented below:
ISO
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Non
Qualified
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
average
contracted
term
(years)
|
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2007
|
1,475,619 | $ | 4.16 | 308,975 | $ | 3.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Granted
|
144,500 | 1.79 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
— | — | (28,550 | ) | 2.36 | |||||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(39,350 | ) | 2.29 | (93,450 | ) | 2.36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2008
|
1,580,769 | $ | 3.99 | 186,975 | $ | 3.53 | ||||||||||||||||||
Granted
|
95,000 | 1.24 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(334,775 | ) | 3.85 | (5,575 | ) | 1.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2009
|
1,340,994 | $ | 3.77 | 181,400 | $ | 3.64 | 4.15 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Options
exercisable at September 30, 2009
|
875,994 | $ | 3.68 | 181,400 | $ | 3.64 | 3.76 | — |
There
were no options exercised during fiscal 2009. The aggregate intrinsic value of
options exercised during the year ended September 30, 2008 was approximately
$309,000.
c. Stockholders’
Rights Agreements
On July
19, 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a stockholder rights plan, as
set forth in the Rights Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2001 (the "Rights
Agreement") between the Company and North American
F-21
Transfer
Company as Rights Agent. Pursuant to the Rights Agreement, one Right was issued
for each share of Common Stock the Company outstanding as of August 5, 2001.
Each of the Rights entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company
one share of Common Stock at a price of $11.00 per share, subject to adjustment.
The Rights generally will not become exercisable unless and until, among other
things, any person acquires 10% to 12% or more of the outstanding Common Stock
or makes a tender offer to acquire 10% or more of the outstanding Common Stock.
The 10% threshold will not be applicable to institutional investors who stay
below a 20% ownership level and who report their ownership on a Schedule 13G
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, stockholders of more
than 10% of the Common Stock as of July 19, 2001 were grandfathered at their
then current level plus 1% unless they later fall below the 10% threshold. The
Rights are redeemable under certain circumstances at $0.001 per Right and will
expire, unless earlier redeemed or extended, on July 19, 2011.
10. Significant Customer
Information
For
fiscal 2009, the Company had one customer, D&H Distributing, that accounted
for approximately 12% of our net sales. For fiscal 2008, the Company had one
customer, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. LTD, that accounted for approximately
16% of our sales.
11.
Related Party Transactions
The
Company occupies a facility located at 91 Cabot Court, Hauppauge, New York for
its executive offices and for the testing, storage and shipping of its products.
Hauppauge Computer Works, Inc., (“HCW”) leases the premises (the “1990 Lease”),
from Ladokk Realty Co., a real estate partnership which is principally owned by
Kenneth Plotkin, the Company’s President, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Operating Officer and a stockholder of the Company, Dorothy
Plotkin, the wife of Kenneth Plotkin and a stockholder of the Company and Laura
Aupperle, the widow of Kenneth Aupperle, a founder and former President of the
Company. The Company is obligated to pay real estate taxes and operating costs
of maintaining the premises subject to the 1990 Lease.
The Lease
ends on August 31, 2011 and calls for base rent in the first year of the term of
$300,000, payable monthly in the amount of $25,000. Rent is subject to an annual
increase of 3% over the term. The execution of the Lease Amendment was approved
by our Board of Directors, following the recommendation of our Audit Committee.
HCW is obligated to pay for utilities, repairs to the Premises, and taxes during
the term.
The
Company had no amount payable to this related party for unpaid rent as of
September 30, 2009 and $48,667 in unpaid rent as of September 30, 2008. Rent
expense to related parties and non related third parties totaled approximately
$730,000 and $687,000 for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
respectively. The Company pays the real estate taxes and it is responsible for
normal building maintenance.
Minimum
annual lease payments to related parties and unrelated third parties are as
follows:
Years Ended September
30,
2010
|
$ | 742,023 | ||
2011
|
666,151 | |||
2012
|
227,315 | |||
2013
|
117,876 | |||
2014
|
58,938 | |||
Total
|
$ | 1,812,303 |
12.
Litigation
In the
normal course of business the Company is party to various claims and/or
litigation. To the best of its knowledge management believes that there is
currently no material litigation which, considered in the aggregate would have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position and results of
operations.
F-22
13.
Acquisition of PCTV Assets from Avid Technology, Inc.
Effective
December 24, 2008, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of October
25, 2008, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Asset Purchase
Agreement (the “Amendment”) (together with the Amendment, the “Asset Purchase
Agreement”), PCTV Systems, Sarl, a Luxembourg company (“Buyer”) and the
Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired certain assets and properties (the
“Acquired Assets”) of Avid Technology, Inc. (“Avid”), a Delaware corporation,
Pinnacle Systems, Inc., a California corporation (“Pinnacle”), Avid Technology
GmbH, a limited liability company organized under the laws of Germany, Avid
Development GmbH, a limited liability company organized under the laws of
Germany, and Avid Technology International BV (collectively, the “Sellers”). The
Acquired Assets were used by the Sellers in the business of, among other things,
the development, manufacture and sale of personal devices containing a
television tuner for receiving over-the-air, satellite and/or cable television
signals that are used in conjunction with personal computers for personal
television viewing. The potential increase in the Company’s customer base, the
potential absorption of the PCTV operations into the existing Hauppauge
infrastructure with minimal incremental costs plus the acquisition of the
seller’s technology, reference designs and product line were among the
attributes that were considered in the Company’s decision to complete the
acquisition.
The
purchase price consisted of $2,238,000 payable in cash; $2,500,000 payable
pursuant to Promissory Note, dated December 24, 2008, made payable by the Buyer
to Avid (the “Note”) and the assumption of certain liabilities. The principal
amount due pursuant to the Note is payable in 12 equal monthly installments of
$208,333. The first such payment was due and paid on January 24, 2009. Interest
on the outstanding principal amount of the Note is payable at a rate equal to
(i) from December 24, 2008 until the Maturity Date (as defined in the Note),
five percent (5%), (ii) from and after the Maturity Date, or during the
continuance of an Event of Default (as defined in the Note), at seven percent
(7%). Pursuant to the terms of the Note, the Buyer and its affiliates are
prohibited from (i) declaring or paying any cash dividend, or making a
distribution on, repurchasing, or redeeming, any class of stock or other equity
or ownership interest in the Buyer or its affiliates, (ii) selling, leasing,
transferring or otherwise disposing of any assets or property of the Buyer or
any of its affiliates, or attempting to or contracting to do so, other than (a)
the sale of inventory in the ordinary course of business
and consistent with past practice, (b) the granting of non-exclusive licenses of
intellectual property in the ordinary course of business and consistent with
past practice and (c) the sale, lease, transfer or disposition of any assets or
property (other than the Acquired Assets) with a value not to exceed $500,000 in
the aggregate, or (iii) dissolving or liquidating, or merging or consolidating
with any other entity, or acquiring all or substantially all of the stock or
assets of any other entity.
The
$4,112,997 paid to the seller, Avid Technology, Inc., consisted of $2,238,000
paid at the closing and $1,874,997 paid pursuant to a note payable. As of
September 30, 2009, the note payable to Avid Technologies Inc. was $625,045. The
interest paid on the note was $62,557 for twelve months ended September 30,
2009. The Company believes that borrowings outstanding under its note payable
approximate fair value due to the short-term duration of the loan.
The
following allocation of the purchase price and the allocation of the purchase
price is presented below.
Purchase Price Paid
|
||||
Cash
paid to seller
|
$ | 4,112,997 | ||
Balance
of note payable assumed
|
625,045 | |||
Warranty
liability assumed
|
262,000 | |||
Direct
acquisition costs paid
|
393,228 | |||
Direct
acquisition costs accrual
|
93,308 | |||
Total
purchase price
|
$ | 5,486,578 | ||
Allocation of Purchase
Price
|
||||
Identifiable
intangible assets
|
$ | 5,262,229 | ||
Fixed
assets
|
224,349 | |||
Total
allocation of purchase price
|
$ | 5,486,578 |
F-23
The
values allocated to identifiable intangible assets in the acquisition are
expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
Because
the acquisition was completed on December 24, 2008, results from the operations
of the PCTV business effectively started on January 1, 2009.
The
following unaudited pro forma results assume the acquisition occurred on October
1, 2007. The pro forma results do not purport to represent what the
Company’s results of operations actually would have been if the transactions set
forth above had occurred on the date indicated or what the Company’s results of
operations will be in future periods. The financial results for the
periods prior to the acquisition were based on internal financial statements as
provided by the Sellers.
Twelve months
|
Twelve months
|
|||||||
ended
|
ended
|
|||||||
Sept 30,
|
Sept 30,
|
|||||||
Pro forma statements:
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 70,367,528 | $ | 133,793,028 | ||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (7,841,031 | ) | $ | (10,560,189 | ) | ||
Net
loss per share:
|
||||||||
Basic
and Diluted net loss per share
|
$ | (0.78 | ) | $ | (1.06 | ) |
In
connection with the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement,
the Buyer, Hauppauge Digital Europe Sarl (“HDES”), and Hauppauge Computer Works,
Inc. (“HCW”), each a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (collectively, the
“Subsidiaries”) and the Sellers entered into a Transition Services Agreement,
dated December 24, 2008 (the “TSA”), pursuant to which, among other things, the
parties agreed to provide each other with certain services relating to
infrastructure and systems, order processing and related matters and systems
transition and related matters (the “Services”), as set forth in detail in the
TSA. The fees for such Services are set forth in the TSA. The term of the TSA
shall be until the earlier to occur of (i) 18 months following the Closing or
(ii) termination of the last of the Services to be provided pursuant to the TSA.
The TSA may be terminated by the Subsidiaries at any time upon thirty (30) days
prior written notice to the Sellers and may be terminated with respect to any
particular Service to be provided pursuant to the TSA upon ten (10) days prior
written notice to Seller.
The
Transition Services Agreement was terminated as of April 30, 2009.
Further,
Avid and Avid Technology International BV (collectively, the “Consignor”), and
HCW and HDES (collectively, the “Consignee”) entered into an Inventory and
Product Return Agreement, dated December 24, 2008 (the “Inventory Agreement”).
Pursuant to the terms of the Inventory Agreement, the Consignor is obligated to
deliver the Consigned Inventory (as defined in the Inventory Agreement) to the
Consignee and the Consignee is obligated to, as applicable, fill orders from
products held as Consigned Inventory before filling any such orders with
products or inventory other than the Consigned Inventory. Upon the sale of
Consigned Inventory by the Consignee, the Consignee has agreed to pay the
Consignor for such Consigned Inventory as follows: (i) if Consignee sells
Consigned Inventory for a price equal to or greater than Consignor’s Cost (as
defined in the Inventory Agreement) for such Consigned Inventory, then Consignee
has agreed to pay Consignor an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the
Consignor Cost for such Consigned Inventory; or (ii) if Consignee sells
Consigned Inventory for a price less than the Consignor Cost for such Consigned
Inventory, then Consignee has agreed to pay Consignor an amount equal to eighty
percent (80%) of the sales price for such Consigned Inventory. The term of the
Inventory Agreement expires 18 months from the date of execution.
F-24
In
connection with the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement,
Avid, Pinnacle and the Buyer also entered into an Intellectual Property License
Agreement, dated December 24, 2008 (the “IP Agreement”). Pursuant to the
terms of the IP Agreement, Avid and Pinnacle have granted the Buyer certain
irrevocable, personal, non-exclusive, worldwide, fully paid, royalty-free and
non-transferable licenses to certain copyrights and other intellectual property
rights owned by Avid, Pinnacle and their respective subsidiaries, subject to
certain termination provisions as set forth in the IP Agreement.
14.
Line of credit
On
December 12, 2008, Hauppauge Computer Works, Inc. (“HCW”), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of ours, executed a Fourth Amended and Restated Promissory Note (the
“Fourth Amendment”) to the order of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”). The
Fourth Amendment modified the terms and conditions of that certain Promissory
Note dated December 1, 2005, executed by HCW and made payable to the order of
the Bank (the “Note”), as amended by an Amended and Restated Promissory Note
dated March 31, 2006, as further amended by a Second Amended and Restated
Promissory Note dated February 28, 2007 and as further amended by a Third
Amended and Restated Promissory Note dated March 31, 2008. The Fourth Amendment,
among other things, reduces the amount HCW is authorized to borrow from the Bank
from a principal amount of up to Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) to a
principal amount of up to Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000), based upon
borrowings made under the Fourth Amendment which may be made from time to time
by HCW (each, a “Loan”). The Fourth Amendment matures on March 31, 2009
(the “Maturity Date”) and principal payments are due on the Maturity Date, and
thereafter on demand. Until the Maturity Date, Loans made under the Amendment
bear interest annually at HCW’s option of (i) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in
the Fourth Amendment) (each, a “Eurodollar Loan”) or (ii) the Prime Rate (as
defined in the Fourth Amendment) minus one percent (1.0%) (each, a “Prime
Loan”). Interest is payable with respect to each Eurodollar Loan at the end of
one month after the date of such Loan (the “Interest Period”), provided that,
upon the expiration of the first Interest Period and each Interest Period
thereafter, each Eurodollar Loan will be automatically continued with an
Interest Period of the same duration, unless HCW notifies the Bank that it
intends to convert a Eurodollar Loan to a Prime Loan or if the Bank is
prohibited from making Eurodollar Loans, and with respect to each Prime
Loan the last day of each calendar month during the term of the Fourth Amendment
and on the date on which a Prime Loan is converted to a Eurodollar Loan, until
such Loan(s) shall be due and payable. Interest due after the Maturity Date
shall be payable at a rate of three percent (3%) per annum over the Prime
Rate.
In
connection with the Fourth Amendment, we agreed that all of the terms and
conditions of (i) our Guaranty as entered into with the Bank, dated as of
December 1, 2005, and (ii) the Pledge Agreement by and among us, the
Bank and
HCW, dated as of December 1, 2005 (pursuant to which, among other things, we
granted to the Bank a first priority right of pledge on approximately two-thirds
of the outstanding capital shares of Hauppauge Digital Europe Sarl, each as
amended, restated, supplemented or modified, from time to time and as entered
into in connection with the Note, shall remain in full force and effect and
apply to the terms and conditions of the Amendment.
Further,
on December 12, 2008, in connection with the Fourth Amendment, HCW entered into
a Pledge Security Agreement with the Bank (the “Pledge Security Agreement”),
whereby HCW grants the Bank a security interest in its certificate of deposit
account held with the Bank. The aggregate value of the Collateral (as defined in
the Pledge Security Agreement) held pursuant to the Pledge Security Agreement
shall not be less than Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000) at any given
time.
F-25
There
were no borrowings outstanding and no letters of credit outstanding as of the
filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On March
31, 2009 our line of credit with the JP Morgan Chase Bank expired and was not
renewed.
F-26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
HAUPPAUGE
DIGITAL INC.
|
||||
By:
|
/s/
Kenneth Plotkin
|
Date:
|
December
29, 2009
|
|
KENNETH
PLOTKIN
|
||||
President,
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief
|
||||
Operating
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
||||
By:
|
/s/
Gerald Tucciarone
|
Date:
|
December
29, 2009
|
|
GERALD
TUCCIARONE
|
||||
Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal
Financial
|
||||
And
Accounting
Officer)
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
By:
|
/s/
Kenneth Plotkin
|
Date:
|
December
29, 2009
|
|
KENNETH
PLOTKIN
|
||||
President,
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief
|
||||
Operating
Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director
|
||||
By:
|
/s/
Gerald Tucciarone
|
Date:
|
December
29, 2009
|
|
GERALD
TUCCIARONE
|
||||
Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal
Financial
|
||||
And
Accounting Officer)
|
||||
By:
|
/s/Seymour
G. Siegel
|
Date:
|
December
29, 2009
|
|
SEYMOUR
G. SIEGEL
|
||||
Director
|
||||
By:
|
/s/
Bernard Herman
|
Date:
|
December
29, 2009
|
|
BERNARD
HERMAN
|
||||
Director
|
||||
By:
|
/s/
Christopher G. Payan
|
Date:
|
December
29, 2009
|
|
CHRISTOPHER
G. PAYAN
|
||||
Director
|