Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

OR

o         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to

Commission File Number 000-23125

OSI SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

12525 Chadron Avenue

Hawthorne, California 90250

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(310) 978-0516

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of October 27, 2015, there were 19,722,098 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

OSI SYSTEMS, INC.

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I —FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OSI SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

OSI SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

OSI SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

OSI SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(amounts in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

OSI SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

Description of Business

OSI Systems, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (the “Company”), is a vertically integrated designer and manufacturer of specialized electronic systems and components for critical applications. The Company sells its products and provides related services in diversified markets, including homeland security, healthcare, defense and aerospace.

The Company has three reporting segments: (i) Security, providing security inspection systems, turnkey security screening solutions and related services; (ii) Healthcare, providing patient monitoring, diagnostic cardiology, anesthesia systems and defibrillator products, and related services and (iii) Optoelectronics and Manufacturing, providing specialized electronic components and electronic manufacturing services for the Security and Healthcare divisions as well as to external original equipment manufacturing clients for applications in the defense, aerospace, medical and industrial markets, among others.

Through its Security division, the Company provides security screening products and related services globally. These products fall into the following categories: baggage and parcel inspection; cargo and vehicle inspection; hold (checked) baggage screening; people screening; radiation detection; and explosive and narcotics trace detection. In addition to these products, the Company provides site design, installation, training and technical support services to its customers. The Company also provides turnkey security screening solutions, which can include the construction, staffing and long-term operation of security screening checkpoints for its customers.

Through its Healthcare division, the Company designs, manufactures, markets and services patient monitoring, diagnostic cardiology, anesthesia delivery and ventilation systems, defibrillator products, and related supplies and accessories worldwide. These products are used by care providers in critical care, emergency and perioperative areas within hospitals as well as physicians’ offices, medical clinics and ambulatory surgery centers; the defibrillators are also used in public facilities.

Through its Optoelectronics and Manufacturing division, the Company designs, manufactures and markets optoelectronic devices and provides electronics manufacturing services worldwide for use in a broad range of applications, including aerospace and defense electronics, security and inspection systems, medical imaging and diagnostic products, telecommunications, computer peripherals, industrial automation systems, automotive diagnostic systems, gaming systems and consumer products. This division provides products and services to original equipment manufacturers and end users as well as to the Company’s own Security and Healthcare divisions.

Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OSI Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to interim financial reporting guidelines. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of only normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations for the periods presented. These condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. The results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full 2016 fiscal year or any future periods.

7

Table of Contents

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and costs of sales during the reporting period. The most significant of these estimates and assumptions for the Company relate to contract revenue, profit and loss recognition, fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, market values for inventories reported at lower of cost or market, stock-based employee compensation expense, income taxes, accrued product warranty costs, and the recoverability, useful lives and valuation of recorded amounts of long-lived assets, identifiable intangible assets and goodwill. Changes in estimates are reflected in the periods during which they become known. Actual amounts will differ from these estimates and could differ materially.

Per Share Computations

The Company computes basic earnings per share by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The Company computes diluted earnings per share by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the sum of the weighted average number of common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding. Potential common shares consist of the shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and restricted stock or unit awards under the treasury stock method.  Stock awards to purchase 0.1 million shares of common stock for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively, were excluded from the calculation because to do so would have been antidilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior-year amounts within the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows to conform to the current year’s presentation.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with maturities of approximately three months or less as of the acquisition date to be cash equivalents.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash, marketable securities, derivative instruments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt instruments. The carrying values of financial instruments, other than long-term debt instruments, are representative of their fair values due to their short-term maturities. The carrying values of the Company’s long-term debt instruments are considered to approximate their fair values because the interest rates of these instruments are variable or comparable to current rates offered to the Company.

8

Table of Contents

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. “Level 1” category includes assets and liabilities at the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.  “Level 2” category includes assets and liabilities from observable inputs other than quoted market prices. “Level 3” category includes assets and liabilities whose valuation techniques are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.  There were no assets or liabilities where “Level 3” valuation techniques were used, and there were no assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

The fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015 are categorized as follows (in thousands):

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity

The Company’s use of derivatives consists of an interest rate swap agreement.  The interest rate swap agreement was entered into to improve the predictability of cash flows from interest payments related to variable, London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)-based debt entered to finance acquisition of land and a building in the state of Washington.  The interest rate swap is for the duration of this term loan which matures in October 2019.  The interest rate swap is considered an effective cash flow hedge, and, as a result, the net gains or losses on such instrument were reported as a component of Other comprehensive income in the condensed consolidated financial statements and are reclassified as net income when the hedge transaction settles.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are charged while assets are used in service and are computed using the straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets taking into consideration any salvage value. Amortization of leasehold improvements is calculated on the straight line basis over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the lease term. Leased capital assets are included in property and equipment. Amortization of property and equipment under capital leases is included with depreciation expense.  In the event that property and equipment for turnkey screening operations are idle as a result of the early termination, non-renewal or reduction in scope of the related project, such assets are assessed for impairment on a periodic basis or if indicators of impairment exist. Certain fixed assets related to the Company’s turnkey security screening program in Mexico are not currently in use.  As of September 30, 2015 the approximate net value of these assets is $19.9 million and is included in property and equipment in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from sales of products upon shipment when title and risk of loss passes, and when terms are fixed and collection is probable. Revenue from services includes after-market services, installation and implementation of products, and turnkey security screening services. The portion of revenue for the sale attributable to installation is deferred and recognized when the installation service is provided. In an instance where terms of sale include subjective customer acceptance criteria, revenue is deferred until the Company has achieved the acceptance criteria. Concurrent with the shipment of the product, the Company accrues estimated product return reserves and warranty expenses. Critical judgments made by management related to revenue recognition include the determination of whether or not customer acceptance criteria are perfunctory or inconsequential. The determination of whether or not customer acceptance terms are perfunctory or inconsequential impacts the amount and timing of revenue recognized. Critical judgments also include estimates of warranty reserves, which are established based on historical experience and knowledge of the product under warranty.

9

Table of Contents

Revenue from turnkey services agreements is included in revenue from services. In certain agreements, revenue is recognized based upon proportional performance, measured by the actual number of hours incurred divided by the total estimated number of hours for the project. The impact of changes in the estimated hours to service the agreement is reflected in the period during which the change becomes known. Deferred revenue for such agreements arises when payments from customers are received in advance of revenue recognition.

Revenues from out of warranty service maintenance contracts are recognized ratably over the term of such contract. For services not derived from specific maintenance contracts, revenues are recognized as the services are performed. Deferred revenue for such services arises from payments received from customers for services not yet performed. On occasion, the Company receives advances from customers that are amortized against future customer payments pursuant to the underlying agreements. Such advances are classified in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as either a current or long term liability dependent upon when the Company estimates the corresponding amortization to occur.

Business Combinations

During the normal course of business the Company makes acquisitions.  In the event that an individual acquisition (or an aggregate of acquisitions) is material, appropriate disclosure of such acquisition activity is provided.  There were no acquisitions during the three months ended September 30, 2015.

Recent Accounting Updates Not Yet Adopted

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an accounting standards update amending revenue recognition requirements for multiple deliverable revenue arrangements. This update provides guidance on how revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for the goods or services. This determination is made in five steps: (i) identify the contract with the customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The effective date was amended in August 2015 for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company has not yet selected a transition method and is currently evaluating the impact it may have on its financial condition and results of operations.

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an accounting standards update amending some of the guidance on subsequent measurement of inventory. This standard affects companies that are using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost, or any other methods besides last-in, first out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method.  The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.  The amendments in this update should be applied prospectively with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company has not yet adopted nor selected a transition method and is currently evaluating the impact it may have on its financial condition and results of operations.

In September 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an accounting standards update simplifying for measurement-period adjustments for acquisitions.  This update provides guidance on how an acquirer recognizes adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. This amendment requires the adjustment to be made in the same period’s financial statements the effects of the adjustments and to be presented separately on the face of the income statement or footnote disclosure.  The effective date for public business entities is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years.

10

Table of Contents

2. Balance Sheet Details

The following tables provide details of selected balance sheet accounts (in thousands):

Depreciation expense was $16.9 million and $13.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

3. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying value of goodwill for the three month period ended September 30, 2015 are as follows (in thousands):

11

Table of Contents

Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $0.8 million and $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively. At September 30, 2015, the estimated future amortization expense was as follows (in thousands):

Software development costs for software products incurred before establishing technological feasibility are charged to operations. Software development costs incurred after establishing technological feasibility are capitalized on a product by product basis until the product is available for general release to customers at which time amortization begins. Annual amortization, charged to cost of goods sold, is the amount computed using the ratio that current revenues for a product bear to the total current and anticipated future revenues for that product. In the event that future revenues are not estimable, such costs are amortized on a straight line basis over the remaining estimated economic life of the product. Amortizable assets that have not yet begun to be amortized are included in thereafter in the table above. For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, the Company capitalized software development costs in the amount of $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

4. Borrowings

The Company has a $450 million credit agreement maturing in May 2019. The credit agreement consists of a $450 million revolving credit facility, including a $375 million sub-limit for letters of credit. The Company has the ability to increase the facility by $200 million under certain circumstances. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% as of September 30, 2015. This margin is determined by the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio and may range from 1.25% to 2.0%. Letters of credit reduce the amount available to borrow by their face value. As of September 30, 2015, the unused portion of the facility bears a commitment fee of 0.20%, but can range from 0.20% to 0.35% based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. The Company’s borrowings under the credit agreement are guaranteed by the Company’s U.S.-based subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of the Company’s and certain subsidiaries’ assets. The agreement contains various representations, warranties, affirmative, negative and financial covenants, and conditions of default customary for financing agreements of this type. As of September 30, 2015, there was $45.0 million outstanding under the revolving credit facility and $6.1 million outstanding under the letters-of-credit sub-facility.

12

Table of Contents

Several of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries maintain bank lines-of-credit, denominated in local currencies and U.S. dollars, to meet short-term working capital requirements and for the issuance of letters-of-credit. As of September 30, 2015, $49.2 million was outstanding under these letter-of-credit facilities, while no debt was outstanding. As of September 30, 2015, the total amount available under these credit facilities was $8.3 million, with a total cash borrowing sub-limit of $1.5 million.

In September 2012, the Company entered into a term loan agreement for $11.1 million to fund the acquisition of land and a building in the state of Washington.  The loan, which bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.25%, is payable on a monthly basis over seven years.  Concurrent with entering into the floating rate loan, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively locks the interest rate of the loan to 2.2% per annum for the term of the loan.

Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

5. Stockholders’ Equity

Stock-based Compensation

As of September 30, 2015, the Company maintained two share-based employee compensation plans (the “OSI Plans”): the 2012 Incentive Award Plan (“2012 Plan”) and the Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Participation Plan (“2006 Plan”).  Upon stockholder approval of the 2012 Plan, the Company ceased to make grants under the 2006 Plan.

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as follows (in thousands):

As of September 30, 2015, total unrecognized compensation cost related to share-based compensation grants were estimated at $1.3 million for stock options and $26.9 million for restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the OSI Plans.  The Company expects to recognize these costs over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years.

The following summarizes stock option activity during the three months ended September 30, 2015:

13

Table of Contents

The following summarizes restricted stock and RSU award activity during the three months ended September 30, 2015:

As of September 30, 2015, there were 2,778,349 shares available for grant under the 2012 Plan.  Under the terms of that plan, restricted stock and RSUs granted from the pool of shares available for grant on or after December 12, 2012 reduce the pool by 1.87 shares for each award granted.  Restricted stock and RSUs forfeited and returned to the pool of shares available for grant increase the pool by 1.87 shares for each award forfeited.

The Company granted 151,469 and 139,300 performance-based RSUs during the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively. These performance-based RSUs are contingent on the achievement of certain financial performance metrics. The payout can range from zero to 250% of the original number of shares or units awarded.

Share Repurchase Program

In March 1999, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to 2 million shares. In both September 2004 and April 2013, the Board of Directors authorized an additional 1 million shares for repurchase pursuant to this program.  As of September 30, 2015, there were 479,764 of available shares that may be repurchased under this program. In October 2015, the Board of Directors authorized an additional 500,000 shares for repurchase pursuant to this program. This program does not have an expiration date. Upon repurchase, the shares are restored to the status of authorized but unissued, and we record them as a reduction in the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding in the consolidated financial statements.

6. Retirement Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors various retirement benefit plans including qualified and nonqualified defined benefit pension plans for its employees. The components of net periodic pension expense are as follows (in thousands):

For the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company made contributions of $1.0 million to these defined benefit plans; while no contributions were made during the three months ended September 30, 2015.

In addition, the Company maintains various defined contribution plans. For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, the Company made contributions of $1.2 and $1.1 million, respectively, to these defined contribution plans.

14

Table of Contents

7. Commitments and Contingencies

Contingent Acquisition Obligations

Under the terms and conditions of the purchase agreements associated with certain acquisitions, the Company may be obligated to make additional payments based on the achievement by the acquired operations of certain sales or profitability milestones. The maximum amount of such future payments under arrangements with contingent consideration caps is $27 million as of September 30, 2015. In addition, one of the purchase agreements the Company entered into requires royalty payments through 2022 based on the license of, or sales of products containing the technology of CXR Limited, a company acquired in 2004. For acquisitions that occurred prior to fiscal year 2010, the Company accounts for such contingent payments as an addition to the purchase price of the acquired business. Otherwise, the estimated fair value of these obligations is recorded as a liability at the time of the acquisition in the condensed consolidated balance sheets with subsequent revisions reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015, $17.2 million and $12.7 million of contingent payment obligations, respectively, are included in other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, approximately $0.8 million of contingent consideration was paid and the liability was reduced by $3.7 million due to revaluation.

Advances from Customers

The Company receives advances from customers associated with certain projects.  In fiscal 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with the Mexican government to provide a turnkey security screening solution along the country’s borders, and in its ports and airports.  Associated with the agreement, the Company was provided an advance totaling $100 million that is scheduled to become fully amortized in fiscal 2017.  As of September 30, 2015, $43.8 million of this advance remains outstanding.

Environmental Contingencies

The Company is subject to various environmental laws. The Company’s practice is to conduct appropriate environmental investigations at its manufacturing facilities in North America, Asia Pacific, and Europe, and, to the extent practicable, on all new properties in order to identify, as of the date of such report, potential areas of environmental concern related to past and present activities or from nearby operations. In certain cases, the Company has conducted further environmental assessments consisting of soil and groundwater testing and other investigations deemed appropriate by independent environmental consultants.

During one investigation at the Company’s Hawthorne, California facility, the Company discovered soil and groundwater contamination that it believes was the result of unspecified on- and off-site releases occurring prior to the Company’s occupancy. Historical usage of this site includes semiconductor and electronics manufacturing, dating back to the mid-1960s, as well as possible aircraft and related manufacturing dating to the early 1940s. Similar operations, including chemical manufacturing and storage, were conducted at neighboring sites throughout that period and into the 1990s. It is not presently known when the releases occurred or by whom they were caused, though Company records, in conjunction with data obtained from soil and groundwater surveys, support the Company’s assertion that these releases are historical in nature. Further, the groundwater contamination is a known regional issue, not limited to the Company’s premises or its immediate surroundings. The Company has filed all requisite reports with the appropriate environmental authorities and continues to cooperate with the local governing agency to develop a complete and accurate characterization of this site. Recent activities include the installation of groundwater monitoring wells, indoor air quality monitoring and additional soil and soil vapor studies. Results from these studies are being evaluated to determine the extent of the on-site releases as well as appropriate and cost-effective remedial action measures. Periodic groundwater monitoring is expected to continue until such time as the governing authority requests further action.

The Company has not accrued for loss contingencies relating to the Hawthorne facility or any other environmental matters because it believes that, although unfavorable outcomes may be possible, they are not considered by the Company’s management to be probable and reasonably estimable. If one or more of environmental matters are resolved in a manner adverse to the Company, the impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, financial position and/or liquidity could be material.

15

Table of Contents

Indemnifications

In the normal course of business, the Company has agreed to indemnify certain parties with respect to certain matters. The Company has agreed to hold certain parties harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations, warranties or covenants, or out of intellectual property infringement or other claims made by third parties. These agreements may limit the time within which an indemnification claim can be made and the amount of the claim. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and certain of its officers. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. The Company has not recorded any liability for costs related to indemnification as of September 30, 2015.

Product Warranties

The Company offers its customers warranties on many of the products that it sells. These warranties typically provide for repairs and maintenance of the products if problems arise during a specified time period after original shipment. Concurrent with the sale of products, the Company records a provision for estimated warranty expenses with a corresponding increase in cost of goods sold. The Company periodically adjusts this provision based on historical experience and anticipated expenses. The Company charges actual expenses of repairs under warranty, including parts and labor, to this provision when incurred.

The following table presents changes in warranty provisions (in thousands):

Legal Proceedings

On December 12, 2013, a class action complaint was filed against the Company and certain of its officers in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “Court”) captioned Roberti v. OSI Systems, Inc., et al. (the “Securities Class Action”). The Amended Complaint in the Securities Class Action, filed on May 20, 2014, alleges that the Company and the individual defendants violated the Exchange Act by misrepresenting or failing to disclose facts concerning the status of the Security division’s efforts to develop automated threat recognition software and the alleged use of unapproved parts in its baggage scanning systems in violation of its contract with the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (the “TSA”). The Amended Complaint also asserts that the individual defendants allegedly sold stock based on material non-public information.  Following a mediation and further post-mediation settlement discussions, the parties to the litigation accepted settlement terms proposed by the mediator and entered into a stipulation and agreement of settlement (the “Settlement”), which was filed with the Court on August 21, 2015.  The Settlement provides for the resolution of all of the pending claims in the Securities Class Action.  The Company and the other defendants agreed to the Settlement Agreement to avoid further expense, inconvenience, and the distraction and inherent risks of burdensome and protracted litigation.  Neither the Company nor the individual defendants conceded any wrongdoing or liability, and continue to believe that they have meritorious defenses to all claims alleged in the Securities Class Action.  Pursuant to the Settlement, the defendants will pay $15.0 million (the “Settlement Amount”) for a full and complete release of all claims that were or could have been asserted against the Company or the other defendants in the Securities Class Action.  The Company expects that the Settlement Amount will be fully covered and funded by the Company’s insurers pursuant to the applicable insurance policies.  The Settlement received preliminary approval by the Court but remains subject to final approval by the Court and certain other conditions.

Three shareholder derivative complaints (the “Derivative Actions”) have also been filed purportedly on behalf of the Company against the members of the Company’s Board of Directors (as individual defendants).  Hagan v. Chopra et al. was filed in the Court on April 15, 2014, and was subsequently consolidated by the Court with City of Irving Benefit Plan v. Chopra et al., which was filed on December 29, 2014.  Kocen v. Chopra et al. was filed in the Delaware Court of

16

Table of Contents

Chancery on July 14, 2015.  The Derivative Actions generally assert the same factual allegations as those at issue in the related Securities Class Action and purport to allege claims for breach of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment against the individual defendants on behalf of the Company. Plaintiffs in the Derivative Actions seek unspecified damages, restitution, injunctive relief, attorneys’ and experts’ fees, costs, expenses, and other unspecified relief.  While the Company believes that the Derivative Actions are without merit and intends to defend the litigation vigorously, the Company expects to incur costs associated with the defense of the actions. At this early stage of litigation, the ultimate outcomes of the Derivative Actions are uncertain and the Company cannot reasonably predict the timing or outcomes, or estimate their effect, if any, on its financial statements.

The Company is involved in various other claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. In the Company’s opinion after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of such proceedings is not likely to have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company has not accrued for loss contingencies relating to such matters because it believes that, although unfavorable outcomes in the proceedings may be possible, they are not considered by management to be probable or reasonably estimable. If one or more of these matters are resolved in a manner adverse to the Company, the impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and/or liquidity could be material.

8. Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is determined using an effective tax rate that is subject to fluctuations during the year as new information is obtained.  The assumptions used to estimate the annual effective tax rate include factors such as the mix of pre-tax earnings in the various tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates, valuation allowances against deferred tax assets, increases or decreases in uncertain tax positions, utilization of research and development tax credits, changes in or the interpretation of tax laws in jurisdictions where the Company conducts business and certain tax elections. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of its assets and liabilities along with net operating loss and tax credit carryovers. The Company records a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets to reduce the net carrying value to an amount that it believes is more likely than not to be realized. When the Company establishes or reduces the valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, the provision for income taxes will increase or decrease, respectively, in the period such determination is made.

9. Segment Information

The Company has determined that it operates in three identifiable industry segments: (a) security and inspection systems (Security division), (b) medical monitoring and anesthesia systems (Healthcare division) and (c) optoelectronic devices and manufacturing (Optoelectronics and Manufacturing division). The Company also has a corporate segment (Corporate) that includes executive compensation and certain other general and administrative expenses, expenses related to stock issuances and legal, audit and other professional service fees not allocated to product segments. Both the Security and Healthcare divisions comprise primarily end-user businesses, while the Optoelectronics and Manufacturing division primarily supplies components and subsystems to original equipment manufacturers, including to the Security and Healthcare divisions. Sales between divisions are at transfer prices that approximate market values.  All other accounting policies of the segments are the same as described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.

17

Table of Contents

The following tables present the operations and identifiable assets by industry segment (in thousands):

(1)        For each of the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, one customer, Servicio de Administración Tributaria in Mexico, accounted for 15% of total net revenues. No customer accounted for greater than 10% of accounts receivable as of September 30, 2015.

(2)        Eliminations within operating income primarily reflect the change in the elimination of intercompany profit in inventory not-yet-realized. Eliminations in assets reflect the amount of intercompany profits in inventory as of the balance sheet date. Such intercompany profit will be realized when inventory is shipped to the external customers of the Security and Healthcare divisions.

18

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

In this report, “OSI”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our” and similar terms refer to OSI Systems, Inc. together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition as of September 30, 2015 and results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2015 should be read in conjunction with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not related to historical results, including, without limitation, statements regarding our business strategy, objectives and future financial position, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “could,” “likely to,” “should,” or “will,” or by discussions of strategy that involve predictions which are based upon a number of future conditions that ultimately may prove to be inaccurate. Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are forward-looking are based on current expectations, and actual results may differ materially. These forward-looking statements should be considered in light of numerous risks and uncertainties described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents previously filed or hereafter filed by us from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such factors, of course, do not include all factors that might affect our business and financial condition. Although we believe that the assumptions upon which our forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, such assumptions could prove to be inaccurate and actual results could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. For example, the Company could be exposed to a variety of negative consequences as a result of delays related to the award of domestic and international contracts; delays in customer programs; delays in revenue recognition related to the timing of customer acceptance; unanticipated impacts of sequestration and other provisions of the Budget Control Act of 2011 as modified by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013; changes in domestic and foreign government spending, budgetary, procurement and trade policies adverse to our businesses; unfavorable currency exchange rate fluctuations; market acceptance of our new and existing technologies, products and services; our ability to win new business and convert any orders received to sales within the fiscal year in accordance with our operating plan; enforcement actions in respect of any noncompliance with laws and regulations including export control and environmental regulations and the matters that are the subject of some or all of the Company’s ongoing investigations and compliance reviews, contract and regulatory compliance matters, and actions, if brought, resulting in judgments, settlements, fines, injunctions, debarment and/or penalties as well as other risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those detailed herein and from time to time in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, which could have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operation. All forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are qualified in their entirety by this statement. We undertake no obligation other than as may be required under securities laws to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Executive Summary

We are a vertically integrated designer and manufacturer of specialized electronic systems and components for critical applications. We sell our products and provide related services in diversified markets, including homeland security, healthcare, defense and aerospace. We have three operating divisions: (a) Security, providing security and inspection systems, turnkey security screening solutions and related services; (b) Healthcare, providing patient monitoring, diagnostic cardiology, anesthesia delivery and ventilation systems and defibrillators, and related services; and (c) Optoelectronics and Manufacturing, providing specialized electronic components for our Security and Healthcare divisions, as well as to external original equipment manufacturer clients for applications in the defense, aerospace, medical and industrial markets, among others.

19

Table of Contents

Security Division. Through our Security division, we provide security screening products and services worldwide, as well as turnkey security screening solutions. These products and services are used to inspect baggage, parcels, cargo, people, vehicles and other objects for weapons, explosives, drugs, radioactive and nuclear materials and other contraband. Revenues from our Security division accounted for 52% and 48% of our total consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

As a result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and subsequent attacks in other locations worldwide, security and inspection products have increasingly been used at a wide range of facilities other than airports, such as border crossings, railways, seaports, cruise line terminals, freight forwarding operations, sporting venues, government and military installations and nuclear facilities.  We believe that our wide-ranging product portfolio together with our ability to provide turnkey screening solutions position us to competitively pursue security and inspection opportunities as they arise throughout the world.

Currently, the U.S. federal government is discussing various options to address sequestration and the U.S. federal government’s overall fiscal challenges and we cannot predict the outcome of these efforts. While we believe that national security spending will continue to be a priority, U.S. government budget deficits and the national debt have created increasing pressure to examine and reduce spending across many federal agencies. We believe that the diversified product portfolio and international customer mix of our Security division position us well to withstand the impact of these uncertainties and even benefit from specific initiatives within various governments. However, depending on how future sequestration cuts are implemented and how the U.S. federal government manages its fiscal challenges, we believe that these federal actions could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Healthcare Division. Through our Healthcare division, we design, manufacture, market and service patient monitoring, diagnostic cardiology, anesthesia delivery and ventilation systems and defibrillator products and related supplies and accessories worldwide for sale primarily to hospitals and medical centers. Our products monitor patients in critical, emergency and perioperative care areas of the hospital and provide such information, through wired and wireless networks, to physicians and nurses who may be at the patient’s bedside, in another area of the hospital or even outside the hospital. Revenues from our Healthcare division accounted for 22% and 26% of our total consolidated revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

The healthcare markets in which we operate are highly competitive. We believe that our customers choose among competing products on the basis of product performance, functionality, value and service. In addition, there is continued uncertainty regarding the ongoing debates related to the U.S. budget, the debt ceiling and the Affordable Care Act, any of which may impact hospital spending, third party payor reimbursement and fees to be levied on certain medical device revenues, any of which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, hospital capital spending appears to have been impacted by strategic uncertainties surrounding the Affordable Care Act and economic pressures. We also believe that the economic slowdown has caused some hospitals and healthcare providers to delay purchases of our products and services. During this period of uncertainty, sales of our healthcare products may be negatively impacted. Although there are indications that a general economic recovery is underway, we cannot predict when the markets will fully recover or when the uncertainties related to the U.S. federal government will be resolved and, therefore, when this period of delayed and diminished purchasing will end. A prolonged delay could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Optoelectronics and Manufacturing Division. Through our Optoelectronics and Manufacturing division, we design, manufacture and market optoelectronic devices and provide electronics manufacturing services globally for use in a broad range of applications, including aerospace and defense electronics, security and inspection systems, medical imaging and diagnostics, telecommunications, office automation, computer peripherals, industrial automation systems, automotive diagnostic systems, gaming systems and consumer products. We also provide our optoelectronic devices and electronics manufacturing services to original equipment manufacturers, as well as our own Security and Healthcare divisions.  Revenues from external customers in our Optoelectronics and Manufacturing division accounted for approximately 26% of our total consolidated revenues for each of the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

20

Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 (Q1 2015) Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 (Q1 2016) (amounts in millions)

Net Revenues

The table below and the discussion that follows are based upon the way in which we analyze our business. See Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information about our business segments.

Revenues for the Security division for the three months ended September 30, 2015 decreased primarily as a result of a difficult prior-year comparable from the partial fulfillment of a significant Foreign Military Sale (“FMS”) contract to the U.S. Department of Defense and our role in providing security screening equipment to the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games resulting in revenues of approximately $15 million and $9 million, respectively, in the prior-year period.  This initial FMS order was substantially completed by the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.  These challenges were partially offset by increased service revenues as we leveraged our broad install base for post-warranty service contracts.

Revenues for the Healthcare division for the three months ended September 30, 2015 increased primarily as a result of increased sales in the North America and Europe, Middle East and Africa regions, as well the impact of a full quarter of revenues from an acquisition of a European cardiology equipment business during the first quarter of the prior fiscal year.  These increases were partially offset by a decrease in organic sales in our Latin America and Asia regions.

Revenues from external customers for the Optoelectronics and Manufacturing division for the three months ended September 30, 2015 decreased as a result of lower sales in both our contract manufacturing and commercial optoelectronics businesses.  Our contract manufacturing business was challenged by a difficult prior-year comparable as exceptionally high prior-year sales were made to a single consumer products customer to whom we still sell.

Gross Profit