LegacyTexas Financial Group, Inc. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - LegacyTexas Financial Group, Inc.	c22682exv32.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - LegacyTexas Financial Group, Inc.	c22682exv31w2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - LegacyTexas Financial Group, Inc.	c22682exv31w1.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - LegacyTexas Financial Group, Inc.	Financial_Report.xls

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-34737

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Maryland	6035	27-2176993

(State or other jurisdiction of	(Primary Standard Industrial	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)	Classification Code Number)

1309 W. 15^th Street, Plano, Texas 75075
(972) 578-5000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer þ	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class: Common Stock		Shares Outstanding as of October 27, 2011: 33,906,691


	Page
	Number

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements:

Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010		3

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010		4

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010		5

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Nine months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010		6

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010		7

Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements		8

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		36

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		61

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		64

PART II–OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		65

Item 1.A. Risk Factors		65

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		65

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		65

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)		65

Item 5. Other Information		65

Item 6. Exhibits		66

SIGNATURE PAGE		68

EXHIBIT INDEX		69

Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

Page 2 of 69

PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)


	September 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from financial institutions	$	16,374		$	16,465
Short-term interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions		37,786			52,185

Total cash and cash equivalents		54,160			68,650
Securities available for sale, at fair value		655,925			717,497
Securities held to maturity (fair value: September 30, 2011 – $557,586, December 31, 2010 – $434,296)		539,257			432,519
Loans held for sale (includes $9,899 and $16,877 carried at fair value at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010)		691,204			491,985
Loans held for investment (net of allowance for loan losses of $16,535 at September 30, 2011 and $14,847 at December 31, 2010)		1,149,626			1,092,114
FHLB stock, at cost		29,210			20,569
Bank-owned life insurance		28,904			28,501
Foreclosed assets, net		2,098			2,679
Premises and equipment, net		48,595			48,731
Goodwill		818			1,089
Accrued interest receivable		8,159			9,248
Prepaid FDIC assessment		5,325			6,606
Other assets		21,997			21,807

Total assets	$	3,235,278		$	2,941,995


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits
Non-interest-bearing demand	$	207,940		$	201,998
Interest-bearing demand		496,269			438,719
Savings and money market		762,238			711,911
Time		607,180			664,922

Total deposits		2,073,627			2,017,550
FHLB advances (net of prepayment penalty of $4,481 at September 30, 2011 and $5,259 at December 31, 2010)		671,761			461,219
Repurchase agreement		25,000			25,000
Other borrowings		10,000			10,000
Accrued interest payable		1,506			1,541
Other liabilities		46,698			30,096

Total liabilities		2,828,592			2,545,406

Commitments and contingent liabilities		—			—

Shareholders’ equity
Common stock, $.01 par value; 90,000,000 shares authorized; 34,262,491 shares issued September 30, 2011 and 34,839,491 shares issued December 31, 2010		342			349
Additional paid-in capital		284,974			289,591
Retained earnings		136,454			125,125
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net		4,665			2,373
Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) shares; 2,148,282 shares at September 30, 2011 and 2,286,428 shares at December 31, 2010		(19,749	)		(20,849	)

Total shareholders’ equity		406,686			396,589

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	3,235,278		$	2,941,995

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Page 3 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Interest and dividend income
Loans, including fees	$	21,838		$	22,953		$	63,132		$	64,921
Taxable securities		6,633			6,656			20,140			17,642
Nontaxable securities		473			410			1,419			1,073
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions		44			67			144			344
FHLB stock		18			15			52			47

		29,006			30,101			84,887			84,027


Interest expense
Deposits		5,702			8,316			18,045			23,834
FHLB advances		2,467			2,910			7,360			9,071
Repurchase agreement		206			205			611			610
Other borrowings		152			151			450			449

		8,527			11,582			26,466			33,964


Net interest income		20,479			18,519			58,421			50,063
Provision for loan losses		581			756			2,741			3,790

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		19,898			17,763			55,680			46,273


Non-interest income
Service charges and fees		4,659			4,694			14,027			13,838
Other charges and fees		144			171			544			509
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans		1,710			3,697			5,538			9,517
Bank-owned life insurance income		118			135			403			305
Gain on sale of available for sale securities		—			—			3,415			—
Loss on sale and disposition of assets		(533	)		(24	)		(749	)		(365	)
Impairment of goodwill		—			—			(271	)		—
Other		109			381			1,403			975

		6,207			9,054			24,310			24,779


Non-interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		11,751			11,843			35,147			34,476
Advertising		351			280			1,217			878
Occupancy and equipment		1,511			1,520			4,333			4,467
Outside professional services		769			648			2,126			1,591
Regulatory assessments		409			819			1,866			2,409
Data processing		1,168			1,036			3,366			3,081
Office operations		1,521			1,458			4,452			4,337
Other		1,087			1,096			3,189			2,980

		18,567			18,700			55,696			54,219


Income before income tax expense		7,538			8,117			24,294			16,833
Income tax expense		2,395			2,709			7,740			5,524


Net income	$	5,143		$	5,408		$	16,554		$	11,309

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.16		$	0.17		$	0.51		$	0.38


Diluted	$	0.16		$	0.17		$	0.51		$	0.38

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Page 4 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(Dollar amounts in thousands)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net income	$	5,143		$	5,408		$	16,554		$	11,309
Change in unrealized gains on securities available for sale		2,982			1,469			6,977			3,325
Reclassification of amount realized through sale of securities		—			—			(3,415	)		—
Tax effect		(1,063	)		(509	)		(1,270	)		(1,152	)

Other comprehensive income, net of tax		1,919			960			2,292			2,173


Comprehensive income	$	7,062		$	6,368		$	18,846		$	13,482

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Page 5 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)


										Accumulated
				Additional						Other		Unearned						Total
	Common			Paid-In			Retained			Comprehensive		ESOP			Treasury			Shareholders’
	Stock			Capital			Earnings			Income (Loss)		Shares			Stock			Equity
For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2010
Balance at January 1, 2010	$	305		$	118,254		$	111,188		$	3,802	$	(6,159	)	$	(21,708	)	$	205,682
ESOP shares earned, 111,343 shares		—			321			—			—		832			—			1,153
Share-based compensation expense		—			1,367			—			—		—			—			1,367
Restricted stock forfeiture		—			334			—			—		—			(334	)		—
Treasury stock purchased at cost, 25,634 shares		—			—			—			—		—			(407	)		(407	)
Dividends declared ($0.12 per share)		—			—			(2,468	)		—		—			—			(2,468	)
Items relating to Conversion and stock offering:
Merger of ViewPoint MHC pursuant to reorganization		—			207			—			—		—			—			207
Treasury stock retired pursuant to reorganization (1,305,435 shares)		(13	)		(22,102	)		—			—		—			22,115			—
Cancellation of ViewPoint MHC shares (14,183,812 shares)		(142	)		142			—			—		—			—			—
Proceeds from stock offering (19,857,337 shares), net of expense of $7,773		199			190,602			—			—		—			—			190,801
Purchase of shares by ESOP pursuant to reorganization (1,588,587 shares)		—			—			—			—		(15,886	)		—			(15,886	)
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—			—			11,309			—		—			—			11,309
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net of reclassifications and taxes		—			—			—			2,173		—			—			2,173

Total comprehensive income																			13,482

Balance at September 30, 2010	$	349		$	289,125		$	120,029		$	5,975	$	(21,213	)	$	(334	)	$	393,931


For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2011
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	349		$	289,591		$	125,125		$	2,373	$	(20,849	)	$	—		$	396,589
ESOP shares earned, 138,146 shares		—			652			—			—		1,100			—			1,752
Share-based compensation expense		—			1,399			—			—		—			—			1,399
Dividends declared ($0.15 per share)		—			—			(5,225	)		—		—			—			(5,225	)
Share repurchase, 577,000 shares		(7	)		(6,668	)													(6,675	)
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—			—			16,554			—		—			—			16,554
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale, net of reclassifications and taxes		—			—			—			2,292		—			—			2,292

Total comprehensive income																			18,846

Balance at September 30, 2011	$	342		$	284,974		$	136,454		$	4,665	$	(19,749	)	$	—		$	406,686

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Page 6 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(Dollar amounts in thousands)


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011			2010
Operating activities
Net income	$	16,554		$	11,309
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		2,741			3,790
Depreciation and amortization		2,625			2,689
Deferred tax expense (benefit)		(189	)		(712	)
Premium amortization and accretion of securities, net		3,406			2,761
Gain on sale of available for sale securities		(3,415	)		—
ESOP compensation expense		1,752			1,153
Share-based compensation expense		1,399			1,367
Net gain on loans held for sale		(5,538	)		(9,517	)
Loans originated or purchased for sale		(5,471,076	)		(5,455,990	)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale		5,277,395			5,217,496
FHLB stock dividends		(52	)		(47	)
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) income		(403	)		(305	)
Loss on sale and disposition of assets		609			553
Impairment of goodwill		271			—
Net change in deferred loan fees		(623	)		(556	)
Net change in accrued interest receivable		1,089			(1,334	)
Net change in other assets		1,957			1,084
Net change in other liabilities		15,297			23,227

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(156,201	)		(203,032	)
Investing activities
Available-for-sale securities:
Maturities, prepayments and calls		103,124			171,251
Purchases		(129,232	)		(475,665	)
Proceeds from sale of securities		93,008			—
Held-to-maturity securities:
Maturities, prepayments and calls		75,642			46,030
Purchases		(184,137	)		(60,472	)
Net change in loans held for investment		(60,707	)		992
Redemption (purchase) of FHLB stock, net		(8,589	)		(6,755	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(2,623	)		(1,359	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		506			3,516

Net cash (used in) investing activities		(113,008	)		(322,462	)
Financing activities
Net change in deposits		56,077			232,292
Proceeds from FHLB advances		422,000			200,000
Repayments on FHLB advances		(211,458	)		(36,860	)
Share repurchase		(6,675	)		—
Net proceeds from stock offering		—			190,801
Merger of ViewPoint MHC pursuant to reorganization		—			207
Purchase of shares by ESOP pursuant to reorganization		—			(15,886	)
Payment of dividends		(5,225	)		(2,468	)
Treasury stock purchased		—			(407	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		254,719			567,679

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(14,490	)		42,185
Beginning cash and cash equivalents		68,650			55,470

Ending cash and cash equivalents	$	54,160		$	97,655

Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	26,501		$	33,862
Income taxes paid	$	8,480		$	4,310
Supplemental noncash disclosures:
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned	$	1,077		$	3,417

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Page 7 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

1. Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of ViewPoint Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all normal and recurring adjustments which are considered necessary to fairly present the results for the interim periods presented have been included. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in ViewPoint Financial Group, Inc.’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K (“2010 Form 10-K”). Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. For further information with respect to significant accounting policies followed by the Company in preparation of its consolidated financial statements, refer to the 2010 Form 10-K.

The accompanying Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements include the accounts of ViewPoint Financial Group, Inc., whose business primarily consists of the operations of its wholly owned subsidiary, ViewPoint Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank’s operations include its wholly owned subsidiary, ViewPoint Bankers Mortgage, Inc., doing business as ViewPoint Mortgage (“VPM”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. Some items in prior years have been reclassified to conform to current presentation.

On July 6, 2010, the Company completed its conversion from the mutual holding company structure and related public stock offering, so that it is now a stock holding company that is wholly owned by public shareholders. Please see Note 2 – Share Transactions for more information. All share and per share information in this report for periods prior to the Conversion (defined below) has been revised to reflect the 1.4:1 conversion ratio on publicly traded shares, which resulted in a 4,287,752 increase in outstanding shares.

2. Share Transactions

The Company, a Maryland corporation, was organized by ViewPoint MHC (the “MHC”), ViewPoint Financial Group and ViewPoint Bank to facilitate the “second-step” conversion of ViewPoint Bank from the mutual holding company structure to the stock holding company structure (the “Conversion”). Upon consummation of the Conversion, which occurred on July 6, 2010, the Company became the holding company for ViewPoint Bank and now owns all of the issued and outstanding shares of ViewPoint Bank’s common stock. As part of the Conversion, shares of the Company’s common stock were issued and sold in an offering to depositors of ViewPoint Bank and others. Concurrent with the offering, each share of ViewPoint Financial Group’s common stock owned by public shareholders was exchanged for 1.4 shares of the Company’s common stock, with cash being paid in lieu of issuing any fractional shares.

The Company sold a total of 19,857,337 shares of common stock in the offering at $10.00 per share. Proceeds from the offering, net of $7,773 in expenses, totaled $190,800. The Company used $15,886 of the proceeds to fund a loan to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) to purchase shares in the Conversion.

On August 26, 2011, the Company announced its intention to repurchase up to 5% of its total common shares outstanding, or approximately 1,741,975 shares of its common stock, in the open market at prevailing market prices over a period beginning on August 30, 2011, and continuing until the earlier of the completion of the repurchase or the next twelve months, depending upon market conditions. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had repurchased 577,000 shares of its common stock at an average price of $11.70 per share.

Page 8 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

3. Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, reduced for average unallocated ESOP shares and average unvested restricted stock awards. Diluted earnings per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock (such as stock awards and options) were exercised or converted to common stock, or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the Company’s earnings. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period increased for the dilutive effect of unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock awards. The dilutive effect of the unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock awards is calculated under the treasury stock method utilizing the average market value of the Company’s stock for the period. Unvested share-based awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method described in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260-10-45-60B. A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per common share computation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows.


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Basic earnings per share:
Numerator:
Net income	$	5,143		$	5,408		$	16,554		$	11,309
Distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities		(17	)		(39	)		(83	)		(115	)

Income available to common shareholders	$	5,126		$	5,369		$	16,471		$	11,194

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		34,757,882			34,555,356			34,811,989			31,012,378
Less: Average unallocated ESOP shares		(2,178,647	)		(2,275,964	)		(2,224,243	)		(1,315,369	)
Average unvested restricted stock awards		(110,595	)		(234,074	)		(164,825	)		(301,227	)

Average shares for basic earnings per share		32,468,640			32,045,318			32,422,921			29,395,782


Basic earnings per common share	$	0.16		$	0.17		$	0.51		$	0.38


Diluted earnings per share:
Numerator:
Income available to common shareholders	$	5,126		$	5,369		$	16,471		$	11,194

Denominator:
Average shares for basic earnings per share		32,468,640			32,045,318			32,422,921			29,395,782
Dilutive effect of share-based compensation plan		28,643			—			56,171			9,740

Average shares for diluted earnings per share		32,497,283			32,045,318			32,479,092			29,405,522


Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.16		$	0.17		$	0.51		$	0.38

All of the stock options outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, were excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock and were, therefore, antidilutive.

4. Dividends

On January 20, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share. The dividend was paid on February 17, 2011, to the Company’s shareholders of record as of February 3, 2011. On April 21, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share. The dividend was paid on May 19, 2011, to the Company’s shareholders of record as of May 5, 2011. On July 21, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share. The dividend was paid on August 18, 2011, to the Company’s shareholders of record as of August 4, 2011. The Company’s Board of Directors meeting to declare the dividend for the fourth quarter of 2011 will be held on October 27 and the dividend will be announced thereafter.

Page 9 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

5. Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of available for sale securities and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes, were as follows:


			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
September 30, 2011	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities	$	251,665	$	3,496	$	(232	)	$	254,929
Agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations		392,617		4,223		(298	)		396,542
SBA pools		4,393		61		—			4,454

Total available for sale securities	$	648,675	$	7,780	$	(530	)	$	655,925


			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
December 31, 2010	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities	$	351,385	$	4,545	$	(1,433	)	$	354,497
Agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations		357,340		3,031		(2,479	)		357,892
SBA pools		5,084		24		—			5,108

Total available for sale securities	$	713,809	$	7,600	$	(3,912	)	$	717,497

The amortized cost, unrecognized gains and losses, and fair value of securities held to maturity were as follows:


			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
September 30, 2011	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities		189,892		8,533		(24	)	$	198,401
Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities		9,437		644		—			10,081
Agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations		289,452		5,415		(171	)		294,696
Municipal bonds		50,476		3,932		—			54,408

Total held to maturity securities	$	539,257	$	18,524	$	(195	)	$	557,586


			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
December 31, 2010	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
U.S. government and federal agency	$	9,997	$	168	$	—		$	10,165
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities		162,841		5,305		(380	)		167,766
Agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations		209,193		1,951		(4,864	)		206,280
Municipal bonds		50,488		578		(981	)		50,085

Total held to maturity securities	$	432,519	$	8,002	$	(6,225	)	$	434,296

Page 10 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The fair value of debt securities and carrying amount, if different, at September 30, 2011, by contractual maturity are set forth in the table below. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, are shown separately.


					Available
	Held to maturity				for sale
	Carrying
	Amount		Fair Value		Fair Value
Due from one to five years	$	3,663	$	3,951	$	—
Due from five to ten years		11,215		12,198		4,454
Due after ten years		35,598		38,259		—
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities		189,892		198,401		254,929
Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities		9,437		10,081		—
Agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations		289,452		294,696		396,542

Total	$	539,257	$	557,586	$	655,925

Proceeds from the sale of available for sale securities during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, totaled $0 and $93,008, respectively. Gross gains from those sales totaled $0 and $3,415 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. There was no sales activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The specific identification method was used to determine cost in order to compute the realized gains.

Public fund certificates totaled $298.0 million at September 30, 2011, and were secured by securities pledged by the Company with a carrying value of $333.9 million as of September 30, 2011.

Page 11 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Securities available for sale and held to maturity with unrealized losses at September 30, 2011, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows.

AFS


	Less than 12 Months							12 Months or More							Total
September 30, 2011	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Number		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Number		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Number
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities	$	37,890	$	(160	)		6	$	8,758	$	(72	)		2	$	46,648	$	(232	)		8
Agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations		16,948		(93	)		3		32,917		(205	)		12		49,865		(298	)		15

Total temporarily impaired	$	54,838	$	(253	)		9	$	41,675	$	(277	)		14	$	96,513	$	(530	)		23

HTM


	Less than 12 Months							12 Months or More						Total
September 30, 2011	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Number		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Number		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Number
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities	$	6,360	$	(24	)		1	$	—	$	—		—	$	6,360	$	(24	)		1
Agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations		20,385		(171	)		3		—		—		—		20,385		(171	)		3

Total temporarily impaired	$	26,745	$	(195	)		4	$	—	$	—		—	$	26,745	$	(195	)		4

Securities available for sale and held to maturity with unrealized losses at December 31, 2010, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows.

AFS


	Less than 12 Months							12 Months or More							Total
December 31, 2010	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Number		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Number		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Number
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities	$	161,854	$	(1,433	)		32	$	—	$	—			—	$	161,854	$	(1,433	)		32
Agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations		125,819		(2,372	)		18		32,358		(107	)		11		158,177		(2,479	)		29

Total temporarily impaired	$	287,673	$	(3,805	)		50	$	32,358	$	(107	)		11	$	320,031	$	(3,912	)		61

HTM


	Less than 12 Months							12 Months or More						Total
December 31, 2010	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Number		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Number		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Number
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities	$	28,394	$	(380	)		4	$	—	$	—		—	$	28,394	$	(380	)		4
Agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations		137,099		(4,864	)		15		—		—		—		137,099		(4,864	)		15
Municipal bonds		30,316		(981	)		72		—		—		—		30,316		(981	)		72

Total temporarily impaired	$	195,809	$	(6,225	)		91	$	—	$	—		—	$	195,809	$	(6,225	)		91

Page 12 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The unrealized losses at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are substantially due to changes in market interest rates since the date of purchase that have adversely affected the market values of those securities. The unrealized losses are not due to credit impairment. The Company does not intend to sell the securities and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity.

Page 13 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

6. Loans

Loans consist of the following:


	September 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family	$	372,949		$	370,149
Commercial		531,729			479,071
One- to four-family construction		9,870			11,435
Commercial construction		15,185			569
Home equity/home improvement		140,945			139,165

Total real estate loans		1,070,678			1,000,389

Consumer loans:
Automobile loans		32,525			42,550
Government-guaranteed student loans		—			4,557
Consumer lines of credit and unsecured loans		11,918			14,197
Other consumer loans, secured		6,476			6,062

Total consumer loans		50,919			67,366


Commercial and industrial loans		44,014			39,279

Gross loans		1,165,611			1,107,034
Deferred loan origination fees/costs, net		550			(73	)
Allowance for loan losses		(16,535	)		(14,847	)

Net loans held for investment	$	1,149,626		$	1,092,114


Mortgage loans held for sale:
ViewPoint Mortgage	$	27,410		$	31,073
Warehouse Purchase Program		663,794			460,912

Total mortgage loans held for sale	$	691,204		$	491,985

Page 14 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, segregated by portfolio segment and evaluation for impairment is as follows:


				Home
	One- to Four-			Equity/Home			Commercial		Commercial and
Quarter to date September 30, 2011	Family			Improvement			Real Estate		Industrial			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance – July 1, 2011	$	3,023		$	873		$	9,559	$	1,897		$	807		$	16,159
Charge-offs		—			(23	)		—		(128	)		(163	)		(314	)
Recoveries		4			14			2		3			86			109
Provision expense (benefit)		(51	)		180			320		109			23			581

Ending balance – September 30, 2011	$	2,976		$	1,044		$	9,881	$	1,881		$	753		$	16,535


				Home
	One- to Four-			Equity/Home			Commercial			Commercial and
Year to date September 30, 2011	Family			Improvement			Real Estate			Industrial			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance – January 1, 2011	$	3,307		$	936		$	7,949		$	1,652		$	1,003		$	14,847
Charge-offs		(74	)		(161	)		(15	)		(470	)		(694	)		(1,414	)
Recoveries		27			14			29			20			271			361
Provision expense (benefit)		(284	)		255			1,918			679			173			2,741

Ending balance – September 30, 2011	$	2,976		$	1,044		$	9,881		$	1,881		$	753		$	16,535

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	755		$	304		$	1,731		$	25		$	3		$	2,818
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		2,221			740			8,150			1,856			750			13,717
Loans:
Ending balance	$	382,819		$	140,945		$	546,914		$	44,014		$	50,919		$	1,165,611
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		5,176			1,330			13,629			445			47			20,627
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		377,643			139,615			533,285			43,569			50,872			1,144,984

Page 15 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)


				Home
	One- to Four-			Equity/Home			Commercial		Commercial and
Quarter to date September 30, 2010	Family			Improvement			Real Estate		Industrial			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance – July 1, 2010	$	2,440		$	802		$	8,357	$	1,614		$	1,102		$	14,315
Charge-offs		(14	)		(94	)		—		(142	)		(313	)		(563	)
Recoveries		3			2			—		25			53			83
Provision expense		175			89			62		196			234			756

Ending balance – September 30, 2010	$	2,604		$	799		$	8,419	$	1,693		$	1,076		$	14,591


				Home
	One- to Four-			Equity/Home			Commercial		Commercial and
Year to date September 30, 2010	Family			Improvement			Real Estate		Industrial			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance – January 1, 2010	$	2,379		$	730		$	6,457	$	1,382		$	1,362		$	12,310
Charge-offs		(174	)		(122	)		—		(455	)		(1,058	)		(1,809	)
Recoveries		11			4			—		26			259			300
Provision expense		388			187			1,962		740			513			3,790

Ending balance – September 30, 2010	$	2,604		$	799		$	8,419	$	1,693		$	1,076		$	14,591

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	491		$	57		$	1,060	$	158		$	18		$	1,784
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		2,113			742			7,359		1,535			1,058			12,807
Loans:
Ending balance	$	380,914		$	138,444		$	486,927	$	36,492		$	72,934		$	1,115,711
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		5,569			567			10,674		452			359			17,621
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment		375,345			137,877			476,253		36,040			72,575			1,098,090

Page 16 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The allowance for loan losses and related provision expense are susceptible to change if the credit quality of our loan portfolio changes, which is evidenced by many factors including but not limited to charge-offs and non-performing loan trends. Generally, one- to four-family residential real estate lending has a lower credit risk profile compared to consumer lending (such as automobile or personal line of credit loans). Commercial real estate and commercial and industrial lending, however, have higher credit risk profiles than consumer and one- to four- family residential real estate loans due to these loans being larger in amount and non-homogenous in structure and term. Changes in economic conditions, the mix and size of the loan portfolio and individual borrower conditions can dramatically impact our level of allowance for loan losses in relatively short periods of time.

Management evaluates current information and events regarding a borrower’s ability to repay its obligations and considers a loan to be impaired when the ultimate collectability of amounts due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, is in doubt. If an impaired loan is collateral-dependent, the fair value of the collateral, less the estimated cost to sell, is used to determine the amount of impairment. For impaired loans, the amount of the impairment can be adjusted, based on current data, until such time as the actual basis is established by acquisition of the collateral or collected. Impairment losses are reflected in the allowance for loan losses through a charge to the provision for loan losses. Subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses. Cash receipts for accruing loans are applied to principal and interest under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Cash receipts on impaired loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are applied first to principal and then to interest income.

The allowance for loan losses is maintained to cover losses that are estimated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. It is our estimate of credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio at each balance sheet date. Our methodology for analyzing the allowance for loan losses consists of general and specific components.

For the general component, we stratify the loan portfolio into homogeneous groups of loans that possess similar loss potential characteristics and apply a loss ratio to these groups of loans to estimate the credit losses in the loan portfolio. We use both historical loss ratios and qualitative loss factors assigned to major loan collateral types to establish loss allocations. The historical loss ratio is generally defined as a percentage of net annual loan losses to average loans outstanding. Qualitative loss factors are based on management’s judgment of company-specific data and external economic indicators, which may not yet be reflected in the historical loss ratios, and how this information could impact the Company’s specific loan portfolios. The Allowance for Loan Loss Committee sets and adjusts qualitative loss factors by reviewing changes in loan composition and the seasonality of specific portfolios. The Allowance for Loan Loss Committee also considers credit quality and trends relating to delinquency, non-performing and/or classified loans and bankruptcy within the Company’s loan portfolio when evaluating qualitative loss factors. Additionally, the Allowance for Loan Loss Committee adjusts qualitative factors to account for the potential impact of external economic factors, including the unemployment rate, housing price, vacancy rates and inventory levels specific to our primary market area.

For the specific component, the allowance for loan losses on individually analyzed impaired loans includes loans secured by mortgage and commercial and industrial loans where management has concerns about the borrower’s ability to repay. Loss estimates include the negative difference, if any, between the current fair value of the collateral or the estimated discounted cash flows and the loan amount due.

Page 17 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Impaired loans at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, were as follows:


	September 30, 2011
							Current				Current
							Quarter		Year-to-Date		Quarter		Year-to-Date
			Unpaid				Average		Average		Interest		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Recorded		Income		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Investment		Recognized		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded :
Real estate loans:
One- to four- family	$	1,795	$	1,795	$	—	$	1,880	$	1,867	$	21	$	50
Home equity/home improvement		859		859		—		1,085		974		5		19
Commercial		2,860		2,860		—		1,052		865		15		41

Total real estate loans		5,514		5,514		—		4,017		3,706		41		110


Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded		5,514		5,514		—		4,017		3,706		41		110


With an allowance recorded :
Real estate loans:
One- to four- family		3,381		3,381		755		3,697		3,215		19		43
Home equity/home improvement		471		471		304		295		291		—		2
Commercial		10,769		10,769		1,731		10,775		10,401		111		327

Total real estate loans		14,621		14,621		2,790		14,767		13,907		130		372


Consumer loans:
Automobile		44		44		2		137		154		—		—
Other secured		3		3		1		4		9		—		—
Lines of credit/unsecured		—		—		—		8		36		—		—

Total consumer loans		47		47		3		149		199		—		—


Commercial and industrial		445		445		25		421		371		4		9


Impaired loans with allowance recorded		15,113		15,113		2,818		15,337		14,477		134		381


Total:
Residential real estate		6,506		6,506		1,059		6,957		6,347		45		114
Commercial real estate		13,629		13,629		1,731		11,827		11,266		126		368
Consumer		47		47		3		149		199		—		—
Commercial and industrial		445		445		25		421		371		4		9

	$	20,627	$	20,627	$	2,818	$	19,354	$	18,183	$	175	$	491

Page 18 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	December 31, 2010
			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded :
Real estate loans:
One- to four- family	$	3,188	$	3,188	$	—	$	3,651	$	107
Home equity/home improvement		455		455		—		366		16
Commercial		1,635		1,635		—		2,710		203

Total real estate loans		5,278		5,278		—		6,727		326


Commercial and industrial		—		—		—		54		8


Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded		5,278		5,278		—		6,781		334


With an allowance recorded :
Real estate loans:
One- to four- family		2,893		2,893		474		1,631		59
Home equity/home improvement		851		851		95		381		2
Commercial		9,295		9,295		1,407		6,432		134

Total real estate loans		13,039		13,039		1,976		8,444		195


Consumer loans:
Automobile		205		205		16		286		—
Other secured		13		13		2		8		—
Lines of credit/unsecured		108		108		5		120		—

Total consumer loans		326		326		23		414		—


Commercial and industrial		272		272		8		299		6


Impaired loans with allowance recorded		13,637		13,637		2,007		9,157		201


Total:
Residential real estate		7,387		7,387		569		6,029		184
Commercial real estate		10,930		10,930		1,407		9,142		337
Consumer		326		326		23		414		—
Commercial and industrial		272		272		8		353		14

	$	18,915	$	18,915	$	2,007	$	15,938	$	535

Average impaired loans outstanding during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, totaled $17,946 and $14,951, respectively.

Page 19 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Loans that are past due 30 days or greater are considered delinquent. Interest income on loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the loan is well-secured and in process of collection. Consumer loans are typically charged off no later than 120 days past due. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. Nonaccrual loans include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans. A loan is moved to nonaccrual status in accordance with the Company’s policy, typically after 90 days of non-payment.

All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Non-performing (nonaccrual) loans were as follows. There were no loans past due over 90 days that were still accruing interest at September 30, 2011, or December 31, 2010.


	September 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Real estate loans:
One- to four- family	$	4,896	$	5,938
Commercial		10,768		9,812
Home equity/home improvement		1,330		1,306

Total real estate loans		16,994		17,056

Consumer loans:
Automobile		—		179
Consumer other secured		—		13
Consumer lines of credit/unsecured		—		108

Total consumer loans		—		300

Commercial and industrial		445		272

Total	$	17,439	$	17,628

A modified loan is considered a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when two conditions are met: 1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and 2) concessions are made by the Company that would not otherwise be considered for a borrower or collateral with similar credit risk characteristics. Modifications to loan terms may include a modification of the contractual interest rate to a below-market rate (even if the modified rate is higher than the original rate), forgiveness of accrued interest, forgiveness of a portion of principal, an extended repayment period or a deed in lieu of foreclosure or other transfer of assets other than cash to fully or partially satisfy a debt. The Company’s policy is to place all TDRs on nonaccrual for a minimum period of six months. Loans qualify for return to accrual status once they have demonstrated performance with the restructured terms of the loan agreement for a minimum of six months and the collection of principal and interest under the revised terms is deemed probable. TDR classification may be removed if the borrower demonstrates compliance with the modified terms and the restructuring agreement specifies a market rate of interest equal to that which would be provided to a borrower with similar credit risk at the time of the restructuring.

At September 30, 2011, $10,333 of the $17,439 nonaccrual loans reported were TDRs. An additional $3,188 of performing TDRs were not included as non-performing loans at September 30, 2011. These loans have been performing under the restructured terms for at least six months and the Company is accruing interest on these loans. At December 31, 2010, $8,669 of the $17,628 reported for nonaccrual loans were TDRs. An additional $1,287 of performing TDRs were not included as non-performing loans at December 31, 2010.

Page 20 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The Company set aside $1,530 and $947 of specific reserves on non-performing TDRs at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. All TDRs are individually analyzed for impairment. Loss estimates include the negative difference, if any, between the current fair value of the collateral or the estimated discounted cash flows and the loan amount due. There were no outstanding commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers with loans whose terms have been modified in TDRs. The following table provides information on loans modified as a TDR during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. This table does not reflect the end of period recorded investment.


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011						Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
			Pre-		Post-				Pre-		Post-
			Modification		Modification				Modification		Modification
			Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded
	Contracts		Investment		Investment		Contracts		Investment		Investment
Real estate loans:
One- to four- family		2	$	269	$	273		3	$	333	$	339

Consumer loans:
Automobile		—		—		—		2		7		9

Total		2	$	269	$	273		5	$	340	$	348

The following table provides information on how loans were modified as a TDR during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011:


	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011		September 30, 2011
Extended maturity – automobile	$	—	$	6
Combination of rate and principal adjustment – one- to four- family real estate		273		339
Other – automobile		—		3

Total	$	273	$	348

There were no loans modified as a TDR within the previous 12 months that had a payment default during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. For disclosure purposes a payment default is defined as a loan that was 90 days or more past due.

Page 21 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Below is an analysis of the age of recorded investment in loans that were past due at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010:


					90 Days		Total
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		and Greater		Loans Past
September 30, 2011	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Due		Current Loans		Total Loans
Real estate loans:
One- to four- family	$	7	$	2,364	$	3,269	$	5,640	$	377,179	$	382,819
Commercial		—		—		899		899		546,015		546,914
Home equity/home improvement		9		132		1,167		1,308		139,637		140,945

Total real estate loans		16		2,496		5,335		7,847		1,062,831		1,070,678


Consumer loans:
Consumer loans:
Automobile		112		—		—		112		32,413		32,525
Other secured		3		29		—		32		6,444		6,476
Lines of credit/unsecured		50		14		—		64		11,854		11,918

Total consumer loans		165		43		—		208		50,711		50,919


Commercial and industrial		34		230		—		264		43,750		44,014

Total	$	215	$	2,769	$	5,335	$	8,319	$	1,157,292	$	1,165,611


					90 Days		Total
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		and Greater		Loans Past
December 31, 2010	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Due		Current Loans		Total Loans
Real estate loans:
One- to four- family	$	3,248	$	3,068	$	3,952	$	10,268	$	371,316	$	381,584
Commercial		2,869		—		1,645		4,514		475,126		479,640
Home equity/home improvement		1,009		175		1,047		2,231		136,934		139,165

Total real estate loans		7,126		3,243		6,644		17,013		983,376		1,000,389


Consumer loans:
Consumer loans:
Automobile		249		18		142		409		42,141		42,550
Other secured		32		—		2		34		10,585		10,619
Lines of credit/unsecured		84		47		108		239		13,958		14,197

Total consumer loans		365		65		252		682		66,684		67,366


Commercial and industrial		174		—		52		226		39,053		39,279

Total	$	7,665	$	3,308	$	6,948	$	17,921	$	1,089,113	$	1,107,034

There were no accruing loans that were greater than 90 days past due at September 30, 2011, or December 31, 2010.

For loans collateralized by real property and commercial and industrial loans, credit exposure is monitored by internally assigned grades used for classification of loans. A loan is considered “special mention” if it is a potential problem loan that is currently performing and does not meet the criteria for impairment, but where some concern exists. A loan is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” loans include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loans classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses of those classified as “substandard,” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” All other loans that do not fall into the above mentioned categories are considered “pass” loans. Updates to internally assigned grades are made monthly and/or upon significant developments.

Page 22 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

For consumer loans, credit exposure is monitored by payment history of the loans. Non-performing consumer loans are on nonaccrual status and are generally greater than 90 days past due.

The recorded investment in loans by credit quality indicators at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

Real Estate and Commercial and Industrial Credit Exposure
Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade


	One- to Four-		Commercial Real		Commercial and		Home Equity/Home
September 30, 2011	Family		Estate		Industrial		Improvement
Grade:
Pass	$	374,440	$	513,241	$	43,519	$	138,074
Special Mention		1,482		21,980		50		142
Substandard		3,693		10,794		215		1,628
Doubtful		3,204		899		230		1,101

Total	$	382,819	$	546,914	$	44,014	$	140,945


	One- to Four-		Commercial Real		Commercial and		Home Equity/Home
December 31, 2010	Family		Estate		Industrial		Improvement
Grade:
Pass	$	374,790	$	466,230	$	38,768	$	137,796
Special Mention		713		2,479		239		63
Substandard		3,663		10,185		220		337
Doubtful		2,418		746		52		969

Total	$	381,584	$	479,640	$	39,279	$	139,165

Consumer Credit Exposure
Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity


					Lines of
September 30, 2011	Automobile		Other Secured		Credit/Unsecured
Performing	$	32,525	$	6,476	$	11,918
Non-performing		—		—		—

Total	$	32,525	$	6,476	$	11,918


					Lines of
December 31, 2010	Automobile		Other Secured		Credit/Unsecured
Performing	$	42,371	$	10,606	$	14,089
Non-performing		179		13		108

Total	$	42,550	$	10,619	$	14,197

7. Fair Value Disclosures

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Page 23 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant and unobservable in the market. These instruments are valued using the best information available, some of which is internally developed, and reflects a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the risk premiums that market participants would generally require and the assumptions they would use.

The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).

The Company elected the fair value option for certain residential mortgage loans held for sale originated after May 1, 2010 in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (as codified in ASC 820.) This election allows for a more effective offset of the changes in fair values of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The Company has not elected the fair value option for other loans held for sale primarily because they are not economically hedged using derivative instruments.

Fair values of certain loans held for sale are based on traded market prices of similar assets, where available, and/or discounted cash flows at market interest rates. At September 30, 2011, certain loans held for sale for which the fair value option was elected had an aggregate fair value of $9,899 and an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $9,714 and were recorded in mortgage loans held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2010, certain loans held for sale for which the fair value option was elected had an aggregate fair value of $16,877 and an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $17,092.

Interest income on certain mortgage loans held for sale is recognized based on contractual rates and reflected in interest income on mortgage loans held for sale in the consolidated income statement. Net gains of $591 and $964 resulting from changes in fair value of these loans were recorded in mortgage income during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, offset by economic hedging losses in the amounts of $655 and $915, respectively.

Mortgage loans held for sale for which the fair value option was elected are typically pooled together and sold into the mortgage market, depending upon underlying attributes of the loan, such as agency eligibility, product type, interest rate, and credit quality. These mortgage loans held for sale are valued predominantly using quoted market prices for similar instruments. As these prices are derived from quoted market prices, the Company classifies these valuations as Level 2 in the fair value disclosures.

The Company enters into a variety of derivative financial instruments as part of its hedging strategy. The majority of these derivatives are exchange-traded or traded within highly active dealer markets. In order to determine the fair value of these instruments, the Company utilizes the exchange price or dealer market price for the particular derivative contract; therefore, these contracts are classified as Level 2.

Page 24 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:


				Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2011, Using
				Quoted Prices in
				Active Markets for		Significant Other			Significant
	September 30,			Identical Assets		Observable Inputs			Unobservable Inputs
	2011			(Level 1)		(Level 2)			(Level 3)
Assets:
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities	$	254,929		$	—	$	254,929		$	—
Agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations		396,542			—		396,542			—
SBA pools		4,454			—		4,454			—

Total securities available for sale	$	655,925		$	—	$	655,925		$	—


Loans held for sale	$	9,899		$	—	$	9,899		$	—
Derivative instruments	$	(49	)	$	—	$	(49	)	$	—


			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010, Using
			Quoted Prices in
			Active Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
	December 31,		Identical Assets		Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
	2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities	$	354,497	$	—	$	354,497	$	—
Agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations		357,892		—		357,892		—
SBA pools		5,108		—		5,108		—

Total securities available for sale	$	717,497	$	—	$	717,497	$	—


Loans held for sale	$	16,877	$	—	$	16,877	$	—
Derivative instruments	$	116	$	—	$	116	$	—

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:


			Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2011, Using
			Quoted Prices in
			Active Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
	September 30,		Identical Assets		Observable Inputs		Unobservable
	2011		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Impaired loans	$	12,295	$	—	$	—	$	12,295
Other real estate owned		2,098		—		392		1,706


			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010, Using
			Quoted Prices in
			Active Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
	December 31,		Identical Assets		Observable Inputs		Unobservable
	2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Impaired loans	$	11,630	$	—	$	—	$	11,630
Other real estate owned		2,668		—		2,219		449

Impaired loans, which primarily consist of commercial and one- to four-family real estate, home equity/home improvement and commercial and industrial loans, are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral (as determined by third party appraisals using recent comparative sales data and other Level 3 valuation inputs) for collateral dependent loans. Impaired loans with an allocated allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2011, had a carrying amount of $12,295, which is made up of the outstanding balance of $15,113, net of a valuation allowance of $2,818. Impaired loans with an allocated allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010, had a carrying amount of $11,630, which is made up of the outstanding balance of $13,637, net of a valuation allowance of $2,007.

Page 25 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

At September 30, 2011, other real estate owned, which is measured at the lower of book or fair value less costs to sell, had a net book value of $2,098, which is made up of the outstanding balance of $3,139, net of a valuation allowance of $1,041. Other real estate owned that was valued using third party appraisals less costs to sell is classified as Level 2, while other real estate owned that was valued using third party appraisals less costs to sell and other Level 3 valuation inputs is classified as Level 3. These Level 3 valuation inputs include discounts of the appraised value based on real estate market activity. Of the $1,041, $666 resulted from write-downs during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. At December 31, 2010, other real estate owned, which is measured at the lower of book or fair value less costs to sell, had a net book value of $2,668, which is made up of the outstanding balance of $3,120 net of a valuation allowance of $452, resulting in net write-downs of $502 for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Activity for other real estate owned for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related valuation allowance follows:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Beginning balance	$	2,326		$	4,436		$	2,668		$	3,917
Transfers in at fair value		556			253			1,077			3,274
Change in valuation allowance		(550	)		(141	)		(589	)		(408	)
Sale of property (gross)		(234	)		(1,678	)		(1,058	)		(3,913	)

Ending balance	$	2,098		$	2,870		$	2,098		$	2,870


Valuation allowance:
Beginning balance	$	491		$	304		$	452		$	37
Sale of property		—			(2	)		(77	)		(62	)
Valuation adjustment		550			143			666			470

Ending balance	$	1,041		$	445		$	1,041		$	445

Page 26 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows:


	September 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
	Carrying						Carrying
	Amount			Fair Value			Amount			Fair Value

Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	54,160		$	54,160		$	68,650		$	68,650
Securities available for sale		655,925			655,925			717,497			717,497
Securities held to maturity		539,257			557,586			432,519			434,296
Loans held for sale		691,204			691,795			491,985			492,367
Loans held for investment, net		1,149,626			1,181,871			1,092,114			1,107,640
FHLB stock		29,210			N/A			20,569			N/A
Bank-owned life insurance		28,904			28,904			28,501			28,501
Accrued interest receivable		8,159			8,159			9,248			9,248
Derivative instruments		(49	)		(49	)		116			116

Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	(2,073,627	)	$	(2,008,954	)	$	(2,017,550	)	$	(2,087,160	)
FHLB advances		(671,761	)		(690,235	)		(461,219	)		(470,729	)
Repurchase agreement		(25,000	)		(28,300	)		(25,000	)		(27,255	)
Other borrowings		(10,000	)		(10,000	)		(10,000	)		(10,000	)
Accrued interest payable		(1,506	)		(1,506	)		(1,541	)		(1,541	)

The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows:

Estimated fair value is the carrying amount for cash and cash equivalents, bank-owned life insurance and accrued interest receivable and payable. For loans, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market offering rates, estimated life, and applicable credit risk. For deposits and borrowings, fair value is calculated using the FHLB advance curve to discount cash flows for the estimated life for deposits and according to the contractual repayment schedule for borrowings. Fair value of debt is based on discounting the estimated cash flows using the current rate at which similar borrowings would be made with similar terms and remaining maturities. It was not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions on its transferability. The fair value of off-balance sheet items is based on the current fees or costs that would be charged to enter into or terminate such arrangements and are not considered significant to this presentation.

8. Derivative Financial Instruments

In May 2010, the Company began entering into interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”) with prospective residential mortgage borrowers whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding and the borrowers have locked into that interest rate. These commitments are carried at fair value in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The estimated fair values of IRLCs are based on quoted market values and are recorded in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. The initial and subsequent changes in the fair value of IRLCs are a component of net gain on sale of loans.

The Company actively manages the risk profiles of its IRLCs and mortgage loans held for sale on a daily basis. To manage the price risk associated with IRLCs, the Company enters into forward sales of mortgage-backed securities in an amount similar to the portion of the IRLC expected to close, assuming no change in mortgage interest rates. In addition, to manage the interest rate risk associated with mortgage loans held for sale, the Company enters into forward sales of mortgage-backed securities to deliver mortgage loan inventory to investors. The estimated fair values of forward sales of mortgage-backed securities and forward sale commitments are based on quoted market values and are recorded as an other asset or an accrued liability in the consolidated balance sheets. The initial and subsequent changes in value on forward sales of mortgage-backed securities are a component of net gain on sale of loans.

Page 27 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The following table provides the outstanding notional balances and fair values of outstanding positions for the dates indicated, and recorded gains (losses) during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.


			Outstanding
	Expiration		Notional					Recorded
September 30, 2011	Dates		Balance		Fair Value			Gains/(Losses)
Other Assets
IRLCs		2011	$	12,651	$	120		$	109
Loan sale commitments		2011		3,216		51			964
Forward mortgage-backed securities trades		2011		12,000		(168	)		(915	)


			Outstanding
	Expiration		Notional					Recorded
December 31, 2010	Dates		Balance		Fair Value			Gains/(Losses)
Other Assets
IRLCs		2011	$	16,082	$	11		$	11
Loan sale commitments		2011		10,207		(79	)		1,367
Forward mortgage-backed securities trades		2011		23,102		105			(1,176	)

9. Repurchase Agreement

In April 2008, the Company entered into a ten-year term structured repurchase callable agreement with Credit Suisse Securities (U.S.A.) LLC for $25,000 to leverage the balance sheet and reduce the cost of funds. The interest rate was fixed at 1.62% for the first year of the agreement. After the first year, the interest rate adjusts quarterly to 6.25% less the three month Libor rate, subject to a lifetime cap of 3.22%. The rate was 3.22% at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010. The securities sold under agreement to repurchase had an average balance of $31,818 and an average interest rate of 1.76% during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The maximum month-end balance during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $32,501. At maturity, the securities underlying the agreement are returned to the Company. The fair value of these securities sold under the agreement to repurchase was $32,179 at September 30, 2011. The Company retains the right to substitute securities under the terms of the agreement.

10. FHLB Advances

At September 30, 2011, advances from the FHLB totaled $671,761, net of a restructuring prepayment penalty of $4,481, and had interest rates ranging from 0.08% to 5.99% with a weighted average rate of 1.32%. At December 31, 2010, advances from the FHLB totaled $461,219, net of a restructuring prepayment penalty of $5,259, and had interest rates ranging from 0.16% to 5.99% with a weighted average rate of 1.95%. At September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Company had $22,000 in variable rate FHLB advances; the remainder of FHLB advances at those dates had fixed rates.

In November 2010, $91,644 in fixed-rate FHLB advances were modified. The 22 advances that were modified had a weighted average rate of 4.15% and an average term to maturity of approximately 2.6 years. These advances were prepaid and restructured with $91,644 of new, lower-cost FHLB advances with a weighted average rate of 1.79% and an average term to maturity of approximately 4.9 years. The early repayment of the debt resulted in a prepayment penalty of $5,421, which is then amortized to interest expense in future periods as an adjustment to the cost of the new FHLB advances. The effective rate of the new advances after accounting for the prepayment penalty is 2.98%.

Page 28 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Each advance is payable at its maturity date and is subject to prepayment penalties. The advances were collateralized by mortgage and commercial loans with FHLB collateral values of $618,310 and $654,913 under a blanket lien arrangement at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. Based on this collateral, and including securities safekept at FHLB and otherwise unpledged, the Company was eligible to borrow an additional $665,896 and $756,432 at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. In addition, FHLB stock also secures debts to the FHLB. The current agreement provided for a maximum borrowing amount of approximately $1,342,263 and $1,223,035 at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively.

At September 30, 2011, the advances are structured to contractually pay down as follows:


				Weighted
				Average
	Balance			Rate
2011	$	378,121			0.14	%
2012		36,720			2.25
2013		67,134			1.70
2014		36,517			2.86
2015		61,742			3.66
Thereafter		96,008			3.27

		676,242			1.32	%
Restructruing prepayment penalty		(4,481	)

Total	$	671,761

11. Share-Based Compensation

In May 2007, ViewPoint Financial Group’s shareholders approved the ViewPoint Financial Group 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, which was assumed by the Company in connection with the Conversion. The Company is accounting for this plan under ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, which requires companies to record compensation cost for share-based payment transactions with employees in return for employment service. Under this plan, 1,624,690 options to purchase shares of common stock and 649,877 restricted shares of common stock were made available.

The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the restricted stock portion of the Equity Incentive Plan was $356 and $340 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the stock option portion of the Equity Incentive Plan was $105 and $102 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for share-based compensation was $162 and $155 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the restricted stock portion of the Equity Incentive Plan was $1,059 and $1,126 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the stock option portion of the Equity Incentive Plan was $340 and $241 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for share-based compensation was $490 and $478 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Page 29 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

A summary of the status of the non-vested shares of the restricted stock portion of the Equity Incentive Plan at September 30, 2011, is presented below:


				Weighted-
				Average
				Grant Date
	Shares			Fair Value
Non-vested at January 1, 2011		218,393		$	13.14
Granted		—			—
Vested		(107,798	)		13.15
Forfeited		—			—


Non-vested at September 30, 2011		110,595		$	13.12

The grant date fair value is based on the last sale price as quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market on the grant date. As of September 30, 2011, there was $931 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested shares awarded under the restricted stock portion of the Equity Incentive Plan. That expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.67 year.

A summary of the activity under the stock option portion of the Equity Incentive Plan as of September 30, 2011, and changes for the nine months then ended is presented below.


						Weighted-
				Weighted-		Average
				Average		Remaining		Aggregate
				Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
Options	Shares			Price		Term		Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2011		457,555		$	12.01		7.6	$	170
Granted		108,500			12.72		10.0		—
Exercised		—			—		—		—
Forfeited		(17,164	)		11.36		—		6

Outstanding at September 30, 2011		548,891		$	12.17		7.3	$	116

Fully vested and expected to vest		528,035		$	12.19		7.1	$	94

Exercisable at September 30, 2011		131,764		$	12.24		6.4	$	26

As of September 30, 2011, there was $692 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-exercisable shares awarded under the stock option portion of the Equity Incentive Plan. That expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.

12. Income Taxes

The net deferred tax assets totaled $5,498 and $6,580 at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. No valuation allowance was provided on deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2011, or December 31, 2010, as the Company expects to realize the future tax benefits. The Company estimates the annual effective tax rate for 2011 will be between 32.0% and 33.0%. The actual effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, is different than the estimated annual effective tax rate due to various immaterial adjustments to income tax expense recorded during the quarter.

Page 30 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

13. Segment Information

The reportable segments are determined by the products and services offered, primarily distinguished between banking and VPM, our mortgage banking subsidiary. Loans, investments and deposits generate the revenues in the banking segment; secondary marketing sales primarily generate the revenue in the VPM segment. Segment performance is evaluated using segment profit (loss). Information reported internally for performance assessment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 follows:

Page 31 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2011
										Total
							Eliminations			Segments
							and			(Consolidated
	Banking			VPM			Adjustments¹			Total)
Results of Operations:
Total interest income	$	28,953		$	368		$	(315	)	$	29,006
Total interest expense		8,581			315			(369	)		8,527
Provision (benefit) for loan losses		582			(1	)		—			581

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		19,790			54			54			19,898
Other revenue		3,851			(3	)		649			4,497
Net gain (loss) on sale of mortgage loans		(682	)		2,392			—			1,710
Total noninterest expense		14,895			3,411			261			18,567

Income before income tax expense (benefit)		8,064			(968	)		442			7,538
Income tax expense (benefit)		2,770			(305	)		(70	)		2,395

Net income (loss)	$	5,294		$	(663	)	$	512		$	5,143

Segment assets	$	3,234,538		$	42,939		$	(42,199	)	$	3,235,278
Noncash items:
Net gain (loss) on sale of mortgage loans		(682	)		2,392			—			1,710
Depreciation		797			72			—			869
Provision (benefit) for loan losses		582			(1	)		—			581


	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2010
									Total
						Eliminations			Segments
						and			(Consolidated
	Banking			VPM		Adjustments¹			Total)
Results of Operations:
Total interest income	$	30,014		$	693	$	(606	)	$	30,101
Total interest expense		11,645			606		(669	)		11,582
Provision for loan losses		748			8		—			756

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		17,621			79		63			17,763
Other revenue		5,788			—		(431	)		5,357
Net gain (loss) on sale of mortgage loans		(761	)		4,458		—			3,697
Total noninterest expense		14,561			3,917		222			18,700

Income before income tax expense (benefit)		8,087			620		(590	)		8,117
Income tax expense (benefit)		2,480			209		20			2,709

Net income (loss)	$	5,607		$	411	$	(610	)	$	5,408

Segment assets	$	2,986,322		$	65,743	$	(65,653	)	$	2,986,412
Noncash items:
Net gain (loss) on sale of mortgage loans		(761	)		4,458		—			3,697
Depreciation		683			78		—			761
Provision for loan losses		748			8		—			756

¹Includes eliminating entries for intercompany transactions and stand-alone expenses of the Company

Page 32 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011
										Total
							Eliminations			Segments
							and			(Consolidated
	Banking			VPM			Adjustments¹			Total)
Results of Operations:
Total interest income	$	84,698		$	1,227		$	(1,038	)	$	84,887
Total interest expense		26,632			1,038			(1,204	)		26,466
Provision (benefit) for loan losses		2,761			(20	)		—			2,741

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		55,305			209			166			55,680
Other revenue		17,446			(275	)		1,601			18,772
Net gain (loss) on sale of mortgage loans		(1,574	)		7,112			—			5,538
Total noninterest expense		45,416			9,457			823			55,696

Income before income tax expense (benefit)		25,761			(2,411	)		944			24,294
Income tax expense (benefit)		8,734			(771	)		(223	)		7,740

Net income (loss)	$	17,027		$	(1,640	)	$	1,167		$	16,554

Segment assets	$	3,234,538		$	42,939		$	(42,199	)	$	3,235,278
Noncash items:
Net gain (loss) on sale of mortgage loans		(1,574	)		7,112			—			5,538
Depreciation		2,401			225			—			2,626
Provision (benefit) for loan losses		2,761			(20	)		—			2,741


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2010
										Total
							Eliminations			Segments
							and			(Consolidated
	Banking			VPM			Adjustments¹			Total)
Results of Operations:
Total interest income	$	83,751		$	1,699		$	(1,423	)	$	84,027
Total interest expense		33,903			1,424			(1,363	)		33,964
Provision for loan losses		3,725			65			—			3,790

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		46,123			210			(60	)		46,273
Other revenue		15,216			—			46			15,262
Net gain (loss) on sale of mortgage loans		(1,228	)		10,745			—			9,517
Total noninterest expense		42,714			11,106			399			54,219

Income before income tax expense (benefit)		17,397			(151	)		(413	)		16,833
Income tax expense (benefit)		5,666			(46	)		(96	)		5,524

Net income (loss)	$	11,731		$	(105	)	$	(317	)	$	11,309

Segment assets	$	2,986,322		$	65,743		$	(65,653	)	$	2,986,412
Noncash items:
Net gain (loss) on sale of mortgage loans		(1,228	)		10,745			—			9,517
Depreciation		2,100			219			—			2,319
Provision for loan losses		3,725			65			—			3,790

¹ Includes eliminating entries for intercompany transactions and stand-alone expenses of the Company

Page 33 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

14. Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to various pending or threatened legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of business or operations. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome, the Company believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding legal proceedings, including the matter described below, and with respect to such legal proceedings, intends to continue to defend itself vigorously, litigating or settling cases according to management’s judgment as to the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

On at least a quarterly basis, the Company assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with pending or threatened legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. On a case-by-case basis, reserves are established for those legal claims as to which the Company believes it is probable that a loss may be incurred and that the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated.

Resolution of legal claims is inherently dependent on the specific facts and circumstances of each case, and therefore the actual costs of resolving these claims may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts reserved. Based on current knowledge, and after consultation with legal counsel, management believes that current reserves are adequate and the amount of any incremental liability that may otherwise arise is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Certain legal claims considered by the Company in its analysis of the sufficiency of its related reserves include the following:

In March 2011, the Company was named in a class action lawsuit alleging that the Company, the Bank and VPM improperly classified VPM’s mortgage loan officers as exempt employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), and thereby failed to properly compensate them for overtime. In September 2011, and without admitting liability, the parties agreed to a mediated settlement of the matter for $350, which is recorded in Other Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and in Outside Professional Services expense on the consolidated statement of income.

15. Goodwill

Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis in the fourth quarter. According to ASC 350-20-35-30, goodwill shall be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value below its carrying amount. Adverse changes in the economic environment, declining operations, or other factors could result in a decline in the implied fair value of goodwill. A goodwill impairment test includes two steps. Step One, used to identify potential impairment, compares the estimated fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. Step Two of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied estimated fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of goodwill for that reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of that unit’s goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

On September 1, 2007, the Company, through the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Community Financial Services, Inc. (now known as VPM), completed its acquisition of substantially all of the assets and the loan origination business of Bankers Financial Mortgage Group, Ltd. The terms of the agreement provided for an initial payment of an amount equal to the net book value of the purchased assets plus $1,000. The excess of the cost of the acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired was recognized as goodwill in the amount of $1,000. An additional $89 of goodwill was recognized in October 2007 due to further expenses associated with the acquisition, resulting in total goodwill of $1,089.

Due to the downturn in current mortgage market conditions and the loss of key production personnel, an evaluation of goodwill was performed outside of the normal annual cycle. For purposes of performing Step One of the goodwill impairment test, the fair value was determined using the income approach by discounting the next five years projected cash flows. The assumptions in the model considered market economic and industry forecasts and management’s judgment. Based on the estimated results in the Step Two analysis, a goodwill impairment of $271 was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. There was no goodwill impairment recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2011.

Page 34 of 69

VIEWPOINT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Deterioration in economic market conditions, changes in key personnel, increased estimates of the effects of recent regulatory or legislative changes, or additional regulatory or legislative changes may result in declines in projected business performance beyond management’s current expectations. Such declines in business performance could cause the estimated fair value of VPM’s associated goodwill to decline, which could result in an impairment charge to earnings in a future period related to some portion of the associated goodwill.

16. Subsequent Events

In October 2011, the Company prepaid the four promissory notes for unsecured loans totaling $10,000 obtained from four local, private investors in October 2009. The notes could not be prepaid by the Company during the first two years of the loan term, but thereafter could be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without fee or penalty. Each of the four promissory notes had an interest rate of 6% per annum.

17. Recent Accounting Developments

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-08, Intangibles–Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. This ASU simplifies how entities test goodwill for impairment by permitting an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Previous guidance under Topic 350 required an entity to test goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis, by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill (step one). If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the second step of the test must be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. Under the amendments in this Update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. This ASU is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a significant impact to the Company’s financial statements.

Page 35 of 69

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Safe Harbor Statement

When used in filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in the Company’s press releases or other public or shareholder communications, and in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project,” “intends” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, changes in economic conditions, legislative changes, changes in policies by regulatory agencies, fluctuations in interest rates, the risks of lending and investing activities, including changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in estimates of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Company’s ability to access cost-effective funding, fluctuations in real estate values and both residential and commercial real estate market conditions, demand for loans and deposits in the Company’s market area, the industry-wide decline in mortgage production, competition, changes in management’s business strategies and other factors set forth under Risk Factors in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected. The Company wishes to advise readers that the factors listed above could materially affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements.

The Company does not undertake — and specifically declines any obligation — to publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Overview

The Company, a Maryland corporation, is the stock holding company for its wholly owned subsidiary, ViewPoint Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank’s operations include its wholly owned subsidiary, ViewPoint Bankers Mortgage, Inc., doing business as ViewPoint Mortgage (“VPM”). On July 6, 2010, the Company completed a public offering and share exchange as part of the Bank’s conversion from the mutual holding company structure (the “Conversion”). Please see Note 2 of the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 1 of this report for more information. All share and per share information in this report for periods prior to the Conversion has been adjusted to reflect the 1.4:1 exchange ratio on publicly traded shares, which resulted in a 4,287,752 increase in outstanding shares.

The Company and the Bank were historically examined and regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”). On July 21, 2011, the regulatory oversight of the Company transferred to the Federal Reserve Board and the regulatory oversight of the Bank transferred to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) as part of the consolidation of the OTS into the OCC under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”). In May 2011, the Company filed applications with the OCC and the Federal Reserve Board to change the Bank’s charter to that of a national bank and the Company’s charter to that of a bank holding company. Both applications are currently under review.

The Bank is also regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Bank is required to have certain reserves set by the Federal Reserve Board and is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas, which is one of the 12 regional banks in the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) System.

Our principal business consists of attracting retail deposits from the general public and the business community and investing those funds, along with borrowed funds, in permanent loans secured by first and second mortgages on owner-occupied, one- to four-family residences and on commercial properties, as well as in secured and unsecured commercial and industrial and consumer loans. Additionally, we have an active program with mortgage banking companies that allows them to close one- to four-family mortgage loans in their own name and temporarily finance their inventory of these closed loans until the loans are sold to investors approved by the Company (the “Warehouse Purchase Program”). We also offer brokerage services for the purchase and sale of non-deposit investment and insurance products through a third party brokerage arrangement.

Our operating revenues are derived principally from interest earned on interest-earning assets including loans and investment securities, service charges and fees on deposits, and gains on the sale of loans. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, FHLB advances and other borrowings, and payments received on loans and securities. We offer a variety of deposit accounts that provide a wide range of interest rates and terms, generally including savings, money market, term certificate and demand accounts.

Page 36 of 69

At September 30, 2011, the Company operated 25 community bank offices in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex and 10 loan production offices located in Texas and Oklahoma. The Company opened new community bank offices in Carrollton and Flower Mound during the third quarter of 2011. The Company purchased these two bank office locations after they were closed as a result of the combination of two national banks that each had bank locations in the same immediate market area. During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company plans to relocate its grocery store banking center located in the Lake Highlands neighborhood of Dallas to a full-service community bank office.

Performance Highlights

•

Lower deposit and borrowing rates fueled a ten basis point increase in net interest margin to 2.84%: A $5.8 million reduction in deposit cost improved the net interest margin by ten basis points to 2.84% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from 2.74% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

•

Loan growth year-to-date: During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, loans increased by $257.8 million, or 16.1%. This increase was driven by a $202.9 million increase in Warehouse Purchase Program loans held for sale and a $52.7 million increase in commercial real estate loan balances.

•

$44.1 million in business lending production in 2011: By adding experienced business lenders and enabling local loan decisioning, $44.1 million of business loans (including small to mid-size business real estate and commercial and industrial loans) have been originated during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

•

Lower net charge-offs led to decrease in provision expense: The provision for loan losses decreased by $1.0 million, or 27.7%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period last year.

•

Year-to-date net income increased by $5.3 million, or 46.4%: The $5.3 million increase in net income was driven by higher net interest income, a gain on the sale of available for sale securities and a lower provision for loan losses.

•

Basic and diluted EPS increased by $0.13: Basic and diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was $0.51, up $0.13 from the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

•

Deposit growth of $56.1 million: Deposits increased by $56.1 million from December 31, 2010, primarily due to growth of $57.6 million in interest-bearing demand accounts.

Critical Accounting Policies

Certain of our accounting policies are important to the portrayal of our financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, changes in the performance of the economy and changes in the financial condition of borrowers. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses and other-than-temporary impairments in our securities portfolio. Our accounting policies are discussed in detail in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Allowance for Loan Loss. The allowance for loan losses and related provision expense are susceptible to change if the credit quality of our loan portfolio changes, which is evidenced by many factors including but not limited to charge-offs and non-performing loan trends. Generally, one- to four-family residential mortgage lending has a lower credit risk profile compared to consumer lending (such as automobile or personal line of credit loans). Commercial real estate and commercial and industrial lending, however, have higher credit risk profiles than consumer and one- to four- family residential mortgage loans due to these loans being larger in amount and non-homogenous in structure and term. Changes in economic conditions, the mix and size of the loan portfolio and individual borrower conditions can dramatically impact our level of allowance for loan losses in relatively short periods of time. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that represents our best estimate of credit losses in the loan portfolio. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, our banking regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to recognize additions to the allowance for loan losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their review.

Page 37 of 69

Other-than-Temporary Impairments. The Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic, market, or security specific concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, the Company may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition. The Company conducts regular reviews of the bond agency ratings of securities and considers whether the securities were issued by or have principal and interest payments guaranteed by the federal government or its agencies. These reviews focus on the underlying rating of the issuer and also include the insurance rating of securities that have an insurance component. The ratings and financial condition of the issuers are monitored, as well as the financial condition and ratings of the insurers.

For periods in which other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security is recognized, the credit portion of the amount is determined by subtracting the present value of the stream of estimated cash flows as calculated in a discounted cash flow model and discounted at book yield from the prior period’s ending carrying value. The non-credit portion of the amount is determined by subtracting the credit portion of the impairment from the difference between the book value and fair value of the security. The credit related portion of the impairments is charged against income and the non-credit related portion is charged to equity as a component of other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes.

Business Strategy

Our principal objective is to remain an independent, community-oriented financial institution serving customers in our primary market area. Our Board of Directors has sought to accomplish this objective through the adoption of a strategy designed to maintain profitability, a strong capital position and high asset quality. This strategy primarily involves:

•		Continuing the growth and diversification of our loan portfolio.

		During the past six years, we have successfully transitioned our lending activities from a predominantly consumer-driven model to become a more diversified consumer and business lender by emphasizing three key lending initiatives: our Warehouse Purchase Program, through which we fund third party mortgage banks; residential mortgage lending through our own mortgage banking company; and commercial real estate lending. Additionally, we are diversifying our loan portfolio by increasing secured commercial and industrial lending to small to mid-size businesses in our market area. Loan diversification improves our earnings because commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans generally have higher interest rates than residential mortgage loans. Another benefit of commercial lending is that it improves the sensitivity of our interest-earning assets because commercial loans typically have shorter terms than residential mortgage loans and in some cases have variable interest rates.

•		Maintaining our historically high asset quality.

		We believe that strong asset quality is a key to long-term financial success. We have sought to maintain high asset quality and moderate credit risk by strictly adhering to our strong lending policies, as evidenced by our low charge-off ratios and non-performing assets. Although we intend to continue our efforts to grow our loan portfolio, including through commercial real estate and commercial and industrial lending, we intend to continue our philosophy of managing credit exposures through our conservative approach to lending.

Page 38 of 69

•		Capturing our customers’ full relationship.

		We offer a wide range of products and services that provide diversification of revenue sources and solidify our relationship with our customers. We focus on core retail and business deposits, including savings and checking accounts, that lead to long-term customer retention. For example, our Absolute Checking account product, which offers a higher rate of interest when electronic transaction volume and other requirements are satisfied, provides cost savings and drives fee revenue while creating what we believe to be a stable customer relationship. As part of our commercial lending process we cross-sell the entire business banking relationship, including non-interest-bearing deposits and business banking products such as online cash management, treasury management and direct deposit /payment processing.

•		Expanding our reach.

		In addition to deepening our relationships with existing customers, we intend to expand our business to new customers by leveraging our well-established involvement in the community and by selectively emphasizing products and services designed to meet their banking needs. We also intend to continue to pursue expansion in our market area by growing our branch network. We may also consider the acquisition of other financial institutions or branches of other banks in or contiguous to our market area.

Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010

General. Total assets increased by $293.3 million, or 10.0%, to $3.24 billion at September 30, 2011, from $2.94 billion at December 31, 2010. The increase in total assets, which was primarily due to a $257.8 million increase in gross loans and a $45.2 million increase in the securities portfolio, was funded by a $210.6 million increase in net FHLB advances and a $56.1 million increase in deposits.

Loans. Gross loans (including $691.2 million in mortgage loans held for sale) increased by $257.8 million, or 16.1%, to $1.86 billion at September 30, 2011, from $1.60 billion at December 31, 2010. Loan growth in our Warehouse Purchase Program and commercial real estate portfolio drove the majority of this increase.


	September 30,		December 31,		Dollar			Percent
	2011		2010		Change			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four- family	$	372,949	$	370,149	$	2,800			0.8	%
Commercial		531,729		479,071		52,658			11.0
One- to four- family construction		9,870		11,435		(1,565	)		(13.7	)
Commercial construction		15,185		569		14,616			2,568.7
Home equity/home improvement		140,945		139,165		1,780			1.3
Mortgage loans held for sale		691,204		491,985		199,219			40.5

Total real estate loans		1,761,882		1,492,374		269,508			18.1

Automobile loans		32,525		42,550		(10,025	)		(23.6	)
Other consumer loans		18,394		24,816		(6,422	)		(25.9	)

Total consumer loans		50,919		67,366		(16,447	)		(24.4	)

Commercial and industrial		44,014		39,279		4,735			12.1


Gross loans	$	1,856,815	$	1,599,019	$	257,796			16.1	%

At September 30, 2011, mortgage loans held for sale consisted of $663.8 million in Warehouse Purchase Program loans and $27.4 million in loans originated for sale by our mortgage banking subsidiary, VPM. Mortgage loans held for sale increased by $199.2 million, or 40.5%, from December 31, 2010, which was due to a $202.9 million increase in Warehouse Purchase Program loans purchased for sale under our standard loan participation agreement. Loans held for sale that were originated for sale by VPM declined by $3.7 million. Our Warehouse Purchase Program enables our mortgage banking company customers to close conforming and some jumbo and second lien one- to four-family mortgage loans in their own name and temporarily finance their inventory of these closed loans until the loans are sold to investors approved by the Company. The Warehouse Purchase Program had 31 clients with approved maximum borrowing amounts ranging from $10.0 million to $38.5 million at September 30, 2011, compared to 29 clients at December 31, 2010, and 26 clients at September 30, 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the average outstanding balance per client was $10.8 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Warehouse Purchase Program generated $2.1 million in fee income and $10.8 million in interest income, compared to $1.9 million in fee income and $12.1 million in interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2011, Warehouse Purchase Program loans increased by $258.8 million, or 63.9%, during the quarter ended September 30, 2011. The recent increase in Warehouse Purchase Program loan balances is primarily due to the current low interest rate environment, the industry-wide increase in refinance activity, seasonal fluctuations and the addition of one new client during the third quarter of 2011.

Page 39 of 69

VPM originated $262.8 million in one- to four-family mortgage loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $358.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Of the $262.8 million originated during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, $187.0 million was sold or committed to be sold to investors, generating a net gain on sale of loans of $5.5 million during that period. The remaining $75.8 million of VPM production was retained in the Company’s loan portfolio. For asset/liability and interest rate risk management purposes, the Company follows guidelines set forth by the Company’s Asset/Liability Management Committee to determine whether to keep loans in portfolio or sell them with a servicing release premium. The Company evaluates price, yield, duration and credit when determining the amount of loans sold or retained.

In 2010, the Company established a mortgage repurchase liability for loans sold by VPM to third parties related to various representations and warranties that reflect management’s estimate of losses for loans for which the Company could have repurchase obligations based on historical investor repurchase and indemnification demand and historical loss ratios. Although investors may demand repurchase at any time, the Company has generally received such demands within 12 months of the investor purchase. The Company had one repurchase and five indemnifications during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to two repurchases and five indemnifications during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Actual losses totaled $91,000 and $47,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This mortgage repurchase liability, included in “Other Liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheet, was $65,000 at September 30, 2011, compared to $38,000 at December 31, 2010. Additions to the liability reduced net gains on mortgage loan origination/sales.

Commercial real estate loans increased by $52.7 million, or 11.0%, from December 31, 2010, with $17.1 million of this growth coming from business real estate lending to small and mid-size businesses operating in the communities we serve. Our commercial real estate portfolio consists almost exclusively of loans secured by existing, multi-tenanted commercial real estate. 91% of our commercial real estate loan balances are secured by properties located in Texas, a market that we do not believe has experienced the same level of economic pressure experienced in certain other geographic areas in the United States. The below table illustrates the geographic concentration of our commercial real estate portfolio at September 30, 2011:


Texas	91	%
Louisiana	2
Oklahoma	2
California	2
Illinois	1
Other*	2

	100	%


*		“Other” consists of Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Kansas, Missouri and Washington.

Commercial construction loans increased by $14.6 million, which primarily relates to fundings pursuant to a $19 million construction loan facility provided to an experienced retail developer to construct approximately 20 freestanding locations for a nationwide, publicly-traded retail chain. The retailer signs a 15-year lease for each location prior to commencement of construction. Our commercial and industrial portfolio increased by $4.7 million, or 12.1%, from December 31, 2010, as we continue to focus on developing this portfolio by adding experienced commercial lenders and applying local loan decisioning and a sophisticated loan pricing model. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we originated $17.1 million in commercial and industrial loans, with the average balance of this portfolio increasing by $5.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same time period last year.

Page 40 of 69

Consumer loans, including automobile, other secured installment loans, and unsecured lines of credit, decreased by $16.4 million, or 24.4%, from December 31, 2010. In March 2011, we sold the remainder of our government-guaranteed student loan portfolio, which totaled $4.6 million at December 31, 2010. This portfolio was sold due to the increasing costs of maintaining and servicing the declining portfolio balance compared to the comparatively low portfolio yield. The sale of this portfolio resulted in a net loss of $146,000.

ViewPoint Mortgage. At September 30, 2011, VPM had total assets of $42.9 million, which primarily consisted of $27.4 million in one- to four- family mortgage loans held for sale to outside investors and $9.9 million in one- to four-family construction loans. VPM recorded a net loss of $663,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to net income of $411,000 for the same period in 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, VPM recorded a net loss of $1.6 million, compared to a net loss of $105,000 for the same period in 2010. The net loss primarily resulted from lower mortgage origination volume, which was primarily attributable to an overall decline in the mortgage market this year. VPM’s operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, included a goodwill impairment charge of $271,000 due to the downturn in current mortgage market conditions and the loss of some of our most productive loan officers, as well as $421,000 in settlement and estimated legal expenses related to a lawsuit filed against VPM. VPM operates eight loan production offices in Texas and one loan production office in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is maintained to cover losses that are estimated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. It is our estimate of credit losses in our loan portfolio at each balance sheet date. Our methodology for analyzing the allowance for loan losses consists of general and specific components.

For the general component, we stratify the loan portfolio into homogeneous groups of loans that possess similar loss potential characteristics and apply a loss ratio to these groups of loans to estimate the credit losses in the loan portfolio. We use both historical loss ratios and qualitative loss factors assigned to major loan collateral types to establish loss allocations. The historical loss ratio is generally defined as an average percentage of net annual loan losses to loans outstanding. Qualitative loss factors are based on management’s judgment of company-specific data and external economic indicators which may not yet be reflective in the historical loss ratios and how this information could impact the Company’s specific loan portfolios. The Allowance for Loan Loss Committee sets and adjusts qualitative loss factors by reviewing changes in loan composition and the seasonality of specific portfolios. The Allowance for Loan Loss Committee also considers credit quality and trends relating to delinquency, non-performing and/or classified loans and bankruptcy within the Company’s loan portfolio when evaluating qualitative loss factors. Additionally, the Allowance for Loan Loss Committee adjusts qualitative factors to account for the potential impact of external economic factors, including the unemployment rate, housing price, vacancy rates and inventory levels specific to our primary market area.

For the specific component, the allowance for loan losses on individually analyzed impaired loans includes commercial and industrial and one- to four-family and commercial real estate loans where management has concerns about the borrower’s ability to repay. Loss estimates include the negative difference, if any, between the current fair value of the collateral or the estimated discounted cash flows and the loan amount due.

We are focused on maintaining our asset quality by applying strong underwriting guidelines to all loans that we originate. Substantially all of our residential mortgage loans are full-documentation, standard “A” type products. We do not offer any sub-prime loan products.

Our non-performing loans, which consist of nonaccrual loans, include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when the collection of principal and/or interest becomes doubtful or other factors involving the loan warrant placing the loan on nonaccrual status.

A modified loan is considered a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when two conditions are met: 1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and 2) concessions are made by the Company that would not otherwise be considered for a borrower or collateral with similar credit risk characteristics. Modifications to loan terms may include a modification of the contractual interest rate to a below-market rate (even if the modified rate is higher than the original rate), forgiveness of accrued interest, forgiveness of a portion of principal, an extended repayment period or a deed in lieu of foreclosure or other transfer of assets other than cash to fully or partially satisfy a debt. The Company’s policy is to place all TDRs on nonaccrual for a minimum period of six months. Loans qualify for a return to accrual status once they have demonstrated performance with the restructured terms of the loan agreement for a minimum of six months and the collection of principal and interest under the revised terms is deemed probable. TDR classification may be removed if the borrower demonstrates compliance with the modified terms and the restructuring agreement specifies a market rate of interest equal to that which would be provided to a borrower with similar credit risk at the time of the restructuring. At September 30, 2011, $3.2 million in TDRs were accruing interest and $10.3 million of TDRs were classified as nonaccrual, including $9.3 million attributable to five commercial real estate loans. Of those loans, $8.4 million were performing in accordance with their restructured terms at September 30, 2011.

Page 41 of 69

Our non-performing loans to total loans ratio at September 30, 2011, was 1.50%, compared to 1.59% at December 31, 2010. Non-performing loans decreased by $189,000, from $17.6 million at December 31, 2010, to $17.4 million at September 30, 2011. Compared to June 30, 2011, non-performing loans decreased by $427,000, primarily due to a $441,000 decrease in one- to four-family non-performing loans.

Our allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2011, was $16.5 million, or 1.42% of total loans, compared to $14.8 million, or 1.34% of total loans, at December 31, 2010. Our allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans was 94.82% at September 30, 2011, compared to 84.22% as of December 31, 2010.

Other Loans of Concern. The Company has other potential problem loans that are currently performing and do not meet the criteria for impairment, but where some concern exists. These possible credit problems may result in the future inclusion of these items in the non-performing asset categories. These loans consist of residential and commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans that are classified as “special mention,” meaning that these loans have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. These loans are not adversely classified according to regulatory classifications and do not expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. These loans have been considered in management’s determination of our allowance for loan losses. As of September 30, 2011, there was an aggregate of $23.7 million of these potential problem loans, compared to $3.5 million at December 31, 2010. Of the $23.7 million, $22.0 million is comprised of five commercial real estate loans that were not delinquent at September 30, 2011, but are being monitored due to circumstances such as a decline in the occupancy rate or debt service coverage. Two of these loans, totaling $7.0 million, were downgraded to “special mention” during the third quarter of 2011.

Classified Assets. Loans and other assets, such as securities and foreclosed assets, that are considered by management to be of lesser quality, are classified as “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss.” An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses of those classified “substandard,” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” Assets classified as “loss” are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted. At September 30, 2011, there were $4.4 million of substandard loans that were performing and were not considered impaired; $1.9 million of these loans are one- to four- family and home equity/home improvement loans that are classified due to the borrower filing for bankruptcy.

We regularly review the problem assets in our portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification. The total amount classified represented 5.9% of our equity capital and 0.75% of our assets at September 30, 2011, compared to 5.4% of our equity capital and 0.73% of our assets at December 31, 2010. The aggregate amount of classified assets at the dates indicated was as follows:


	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(Dollars in thousands)
Loss	$	—	$	—
Doubtful		5,434		4,185
Substandard		18,701		17,410

Total	$	24,135	$	21,595

Securities. Our securities portfolio increased by $45.2 million, or 3.9%, to $1.20 billion at September 30, 2011, from $1.15 billion at December 31, 2010. The increase in our securities portfolio was funded by increased deposit volume. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, $313.4 million of securities purchased was partially offset by proceeds from securities sales totaling $93.0 million and maturities and paydowns totaling $178.8 million. The purchases consisted of $129.2 million of securities deemed available for sale and $184.2 million of securities that were recorded as held to maturity, resulting in a $61.5 million reduction in available for sale securities and a $106.7 million increase in held to maturity securities. The classification of these purchased securities was determined in accordance with ASC 320-10. The available for sale securities purchased consisted of floating rate U.S. government agency collateralized mortgage obligations and fixed rate agency mortgage backed securities. The held to maturity securities purchased consisted of fixed and adjustable rate government and agency mortgage backed securities, fixed rate government and agency collateralized mortgage obligations, and ascending rate government and agency collateralized mortgage obligations. This mix was determined due to its strong cash flow characteristics in various interest rate environments.

Page 42 of 69

In February 2011, the Company sold 17 mortgage-backed securities and six collateralized mortgage obligations at a face value totaling $89.0 million, which resulted in a pre-tax gain on sale of $3.4 million. These securities had a fair value of $99.8 million and an amortized cost of $96.0 million at December 31, 2010. The securities sale, along with the securities purchased with sales proceeds, was part of an asset/liability management strategy to lower asset duration and better position the Company for a rise in market interest rates. The proceeds from the sale were reinvested into government agency floaters, which are securities with coupons that adjust monthly at a positive spread to the one month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). Since the coupon rate adjusts monthly, these securities have a duration of less than one month and better position us for upward movement in the interest rate cycle because if interest rates rise, the coupons on these securities will increase as well.

Deposits. Total deposits increased by $56.1 million, or 2.8%, to $2.07 billion at September 30, 2011, from $2.02 billion at December 31, 2010.


	September 30,		December 31,		Dollar			Percent
	2011		2010		Change			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing demand	$	207,940	$	201,998	$	5,942			2.9	%
Interest-bearing demand		496,269		438,719		57,550			13.1
Savings		155,476		148,399		7,077			4.8
Money Market		596,561		554,261		42,300			7.6
IRA		10,201		9,251		950			10.3
Time		607,180		664,922		(57,742	)		(8.7	)

Total deposits	$	2,073,627	$	2,017,550	$	56,077			2.8	%

The increase in deposits was primarily attributable to a $57.6 million, or 13.1%, increase in interest-bearing demand deposits, principally in our Absolute Checking product which increased by $59.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Effective September 1, 2011, the Absolute Checking annual percentage yield (APY) was reduced from 4.0% to 3.0% APY on account balances up to $25,000 if certain conditions are met. These conditions include using direct deposit or online bill pay, receiving statements online and having at least 15 Visa Check Card transactions per month for purchases. Absolute Checking encourages relationship accounts with required electronic transactions that are intended to reduce the expense of maintaining this product. At September 30, 2011, 55% of Absolute Checking account holders met the requirements to earn the 3.0% APY. Since Absolute Checking was introduced in May 2008, the balance has increased $436.5 million, from $5.4 million at the product’s inception to $441.9 million at September 2011. At September 30, 2011, the rate paid was 0.30% for balances between $25,001 to $100,000 and 0.03% for balances above $100,000 and for non-qualifying accounts. The average rate paid on Absolute Checking accounts during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was 2.14%, compared to 2.90% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Money market balances increased by $42.3 million, or 7.6%, with $25.6 million of this increase attributable to our new Insured Cash Sweep money market product, through which customer funds are swept from a transaction account at the Company into money market accounts at multiple banks to allow access to FDIC insurance coverage through multiple accounts. Time balances decreased by $57.7 million, or 8.7%, primarily due to an $82.6 million decline in public funds certificates, as these certificates matured and were placed into more liquid assets.

Page 43 of 69

Borrowings. FHLB advances, net of a $4.5 million restructuring prepayment penalty, increased by $210.6 million, or 45.7%, from $461.2 million at December 31, 2010, to $671.8 million at September 30, 2011. The increase was primarily due to funding needs for the Warehouse Purchase Program, as the balance of loans in the Program increased by $202.9 million from December 31, 2010. The Company has made a strategic decision to fund a portion of Warehouse Purchase Program balances, which are typically on the Company’s books for less than 30 days, with short-term advances. At September 30, 2011, the Company had short-term FHLB advances totaling $372.0 million that are due to mature in 30 days or less with a weighted average rate of 0.09%.

At September 30, 2011, the Company was eligible to borrow an additional $1.34 billion from the FHLB. Additionally, the Company has sufficient collateral to borrow $35.1 million from the Federal Reserve Bank discount window and has three available federal funds lines of credit with other financial institutions totaling $76.0 million.

In October 2011, the Company prepaid the four promissory notes for unsecured loans totaling $10 million obtained from four local, private investors in October 2009. The notes could not be prepaid by the Company during the first two years of the loan term, but thereafter could be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without fee or penalty. Each of the four promissory notes had an interest rate of 6% per annum.

Shareholders’ Equity. Total shareholders’ equity increased by $10.1 million, or 2.5%, from $396.6 million at December 31, 2010, to $406.7 million at September 30, 2011.


	September 30,			December 31,			Dollar			Percent
	2011			2010			Change			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common stock	$	342		$	349		$	(7	)		(2.0	%)
Additional paid-in capital		284,974			289,591			(4,617	)		(1.6	)
Retained earnings		136,454			125,125			11,329			9.1
Accumulated other comprehensive income		4,665			2,373			2,292			96.6
Unearned ESOP shares		(19,749	)		(20,849	)		1,100			5.3

Total shareholders’ equity	$	406,686		$	396,589		$	10,097			2.5	%

The increase in shareholders’ equity was primarily due to net income of $16.6 million recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, which was partially offset by the payment of three quarterly dividends totaling $0.15 per common share. These dividends reduced retained earnings by $5.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. On August 26, 2011, the Company announced its intention to repurchase up to 5% of its total common shares outstanding, or approximately 1,741,975 shares of its common stock in the open market, at prevailing market prices, over a period beginning on August 30, 2011, continuing until the earlier of the completion of the repurchase or the next twelve months, depending upon market conditions. At September 30, 2011, 577,000 shares had been repurchased by the Company at an average price of $11.70, resulting in reductions in common stock and additional paid-in capital.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

General. Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2011, was $5.1 million, a decrease of $265,000, or 4.9%, from net income of $5.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in net income was primarily due to lower non-interest income, which was driven by a $2.0 million reduction in the net gain on sale of mortgage loans. The decrease was partially offset by higher net interest income and reductions in the provision for loan losses and noninterest expense. Our basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2011, was $0.16, a $0.01 decrease from $0.17 for the three months ended September 30, 2010.

Page 44 of 69

Interest Income. Interest income decreased by $1.1 million, or 3.6%, from $30.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, to $29.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011.


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,				Dollar			Percent
	2011		2010		Change			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest and dividend income
Loans, including fees	$	21,838	$	22,953	$	(1,115	)		(4.9	%)
Securities		7,106		7,066		40			0.6
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions		44		67		(23	)		(34.3	)
FHLB stock		18		15		3			20.0

	$	29,006	$	30,101	$	(1,095	)		(3.6	%)

The decrease in interest income was driven by a $1.1 million, or 4.9%, decrease in the interest income earned on loans, which was primarily attributable to a reduction in the volume and rate earned on Warehouse Purchase Program loans. The average balance of Warehouse Purchase Program loans decreased by $27.9 million from the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period this year. Also, the rate earned on Warehouse Purchase Program loans decreased by 55 basis points, from 4.91% for the third quarter of 2010 to 4.36% for the third quarter in 2011. Declines in the interest earned on loans held for sale, one- to four-family mortgages, home equity/home improvement loans and consumer loans were partially offset by a $593,000 increase in the interest earned on commercial real estate loans. Although the rate earned on commercial real estate loans declined by 11 basis points during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010, as new volume in 2011 had lower rates than loans being paid off, the average balance of commercial real estate loans increased by $43.3 million. Interest earned on commercial and industrial loans increased by $93,000 due to a $7.1 million increase in volume during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period last year.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased by $3.1 million, or 26.4%, from $11.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, to $8.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011.


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,				Dollar			Percent
	2011		2010		Change			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest expense
Deposits	$	5,702	$	8,316	$	(2,614	)		(31.4	%)
FHLB advances		2,467		2,910		(443	)		(15.2	)
Repurchase agreement		206		205		1			—
Other borrowings		152		151		1			—

	$	8,527	$	11,582	$	(3,055	)		(26.4	%)

The decrease was primarily caused by a $2.6 million, or 31.4%, decrease in the interest expense paid on deposits. Although the average balance of interest-bearing demand, savings and money market accounts increased during the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same time last year, lower rates paid on all deposit categories and a decrease in the average balance of time deposits offset the increase in all other balances. Interest expense paid on Absolute Checking decreased by $607,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period last year, due to gradual rate reductions throughout the past year. Effective on September 1, 2011, interest was paid on Absolute Checking balances at 3.00% APY on balances up to $25,000, 0.30% for balances between $25,001 to $100,000 and 0.03% on balances greater than $100,000 and non-qualifying accounts, compared to 4.00% APY on balances up to $50,000, 0.95% on balances between $50,001 and $100,000 and 0.04% on balances greater than $100,000 and non-qualifying accounts in September 2010. Also, over the past year the Company has decreased the rate paid on certain money market accounts from a range of 0.95% to 5.50% at September 30, 2010, to a range of 0.30% to 1.25% at September 30, 2011.

Page 45 of 69

Interest expense on FHLB advances decreased by $443,000, or 15.2%, as the average rate paid on borrowings decreased by 98 basis points, from 3.44% for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, to 2.46% for the same period in 2011. In November 2010, $91.6 million in fixed-rate FHLB advances were modified. These advances, which had a weighted average rate of 4.15%, were prepaid and restructured with $91.6 million of new, lower-cost FHLB advances with a weighted average rate of 1.79%, which contributed to the reduction in interest expense paid on FHLB advances. The average rate paid on borrowings was further impacted by the strategic decision to fund a portion of the Warehouse Purchase Program loans with short-term advances. At September 30, 2011, the Company had short-term advances totaling $372.0 million that are due to mature in 30 days or less with a weighted average rate of 0.09%. Overall, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 68 basis points, from 2.14% for the three months ended September 30, 2010, to 1.46% for the three months ended September 30, 2011.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased by $2.0 million, or 10.6%, to $20.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, from $18.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The net interest rate spread increased 18 basis points to 2.60% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, from 2.42% for the same period last year. The net interest margin increased six basis points to 2.87% for the three months ended September 30, 2011, from 2.81% for the same period last year. The increase in the net interest rate spread and margin was primarily attributable to lower deposit and borrowing rates.

Page 46 of 69

Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the total dollar amount of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates. Also presented is the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets, rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities and the resultant spread. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accruing loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011								2010
	Average								Average
	Outstanding			Interest					Outstanding			Interest
	Balance			Earned/Paid		Yield/Rate			Balance			Earned/Paid		Yield/Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
One- to four- family real estate	$	381,322		$	5,047		5.29	%	$	382,238		$	5,295		5.54	%
Warehouse Purchase Program loans held for sale		395,711			4,310		4.36			423,567			5,195		4.91
ViewPoint Mortgage loans held for sale		21,213			230		4.34			49,883			557		4.47
Commercial real estate		524,516			8,660		6.60			481,178			8,067		6.71
Home equity/home improvement		141,483			2,019		5.71			135,776			2,026		5.97
Consumer		51,246			875		6.83			76,978			1,209		6.28
Commercial and industrial		43,806			697		6.36			36,738			604		6.58
Less: deferred fees and allowance for loan loss		(16,135	)		—		—			(14,926	)		—		—

Loans receivable ¹		1,543,162			21,838		5.66			1,571,432			22,953		5.84
Agency mortgage-backed securities		463,480			3,233		2.79			490,285			3,789		3.09
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations		695,367			3,336		1.92			364,323			2,336		2.56
Investment securities		59,577			537		3.61			110,858			941		3.40
FHLB stock		19,429			18		0.37			16,032			15		0.37
Interest-earning deposit accounts		73,236			44		0.24			87,549			67		0.31

Total interest-earning assets		2,854,251			29,006		4.06			2,640,479			30,101		4.56


Non-interest-earning assets		128,364								203,688


Total assets	$	2,982,615							$	2,844,167


Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand	$	484,926			2,155		1.78		$	419,770			2,781		2.65
Savings and money market		753,252			871		0.46			724,333			2,407		1.33
Time		634,754			2,676		1.69			641,021			3,128		1.95
Borrowings		458,620			2,825		2.46			379,422			3,266		3.44

Total interest-bearing liabilities		2,331,552			8,527		1.46			2,164,546			11,582		2.14


Non-interest-bearing checking		193,725								187,639


Non-interest-bearing liabilities		47,260								75,317


Total liabilities		2,572,537								2,427,502


Total shareholders’ equity		410,078								416,665


Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	2,982,615							$	2,844,167


Net interest income and margin				$	20,479		2.87	%				$	18,519		2.81	%


Net interest income and margin (tax-equivalent basis)²				$	20,653		2.89	%				$	18,669		2.83	%

Net interest rate spread							2.60	%							2.42	%
Net earning assets	$	522,699							$	475,933

Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		122.42	%							121.99	%


¹		Calculated net of deferred fees, loan discounts, loans in process and allowance for loan losses. Construction loans have been included in the one- to four- family and commercial real estate line items, as appropriate.

²		In order to make pretax income and resultant yields on tax-exempt investments and loans comparable to those on taxable investments and loans, a tax-equivalent adjustment has been computed using a federal income tax rate of 35% for 2011 and 2010. Tax-exempt investments and loans had average balances of $52.6 million and $44.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Page 47 of 69

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following schedule presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It distinguishes between the changes related to outstanding balances and those due to changes in interest rates. The change in interest attributable to rate has been determined by applying the change in rate between periods to average balances outstanding in the prior period. The change in interest due to volume has been determined by applying the rate from the earlier period to the change in average balances outstanding between periods. Changes attributable to both rate and volume which cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011 versus 2010
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
							Total
							Increase
	Volume			Rate			(Decrease)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
One- to four- family real estate	$	(13	)	$	(235	)	$	(248	)
Warehouse Purchase Program loans held for sale		(327	)		(558	)		(885	)
ViewPoint Mortgage loans held for sale		(311	)		(16	)		(327	)
Commercial real estate		717			(124	)		593
Home equity/home improvement		83			(90	)		(7	)
Consumer		(432	)		98			(334	)
Commercial and industrial		113			(20	)		93

Loans receivable		(170	)		(945	)		(1,115	)
Agency mortgage-backed securities		(200	)		(356	)		(556	)
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations		1,704			(704	)		1,000
Investment securities		(459	)		55			(404	)
FHLB stock		3			—			3
Interest-earning deposit accounts		(10	)		(13	)		(23	)

Total interest-earning assets		868			(1,963	)		(1,095	)


Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand		386			(1,012	)		(626	)
Savings and money market		92			(1,628	)		(1,536	)
Time		(30	)		(422	)		(452	)
Borrowings		600			(1,041	)		(441	)

Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,048			(4,103	)		(3,055	)


Net interest income	$	(180	)	$	2,140		$	1,960

Page 48 of 69

Provision for Loan Losses. We establish provisions for loan losses, which are charged to earnings, at a level required to reflect estimated credit losses in the loan portfolio. In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan losses, management considers historical loss experience, the types of loans and the amount of loans in the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect borrowers’ ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, prevailing economic conditions, and current factors.

The provision for loan losses was $581,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, a decrease of $175,000, or 23.1%, from the three months ended September 30, 2010. The balance of the allowance for loan losses increased by $1.9 million from September 30, 2010, to September 30, 2011, as management increased qualitative factors due to the continued weak economic conditions. Despite these trends, the Company has not seen an increase in charge-offs, as net charge-offs declined by $275,000 during the third quarter of 2011 compared to the same period last year.

Page 49 of 69

Non-interest Income. Non-interest income decreased by $2.9 million, or 31.4%, from $9.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, to $6.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011.


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,						Dollar			Percent
	2011			2010			Change			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest income
Service charges and fees	$	4,659		$	4,694		$	(35	)		(0.7	%)
Other charges and fees		144			171			(27	)		(15.8	)
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans		1,710			3,697			(1,987	)		(53.7	)
Bank-owned life insurance income		118			135			(17	)		(12.6	)
Loss on sale and disposition of assets		(533	)		(24	)		(509	)		(2,120.8	)
Other		109			381			(272	)		(71.4	)

	$	6,207		$	9,054		$	(2,847	)		(31.4	%)

The decrease in non-interest income was primarily due to a $2.0 million, or 53.7%, decline in the net gain on sale of mortgage loans, as VPM sold $62.2 million in loans to outside investors during the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $107.0 million during the same period in 2010. The decrease in sales can be attributed to the lower volume of one- to four-family loan originations in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the volume experienced during the same period last year.

Loss on sale and disposition of assets increased by $509,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010, primarily due to value declines related to a commercial real estate foreclosed asset. In addition, non-sufficient funds fees declined by $493,000 caused by lower volume, partially offset by a $229,000 increase in debit card income due to increased debit card usage and a $99,000 increase in commercial fee income, which resulted from a pre-payment penalty on a $4.9 million commercial real estate loan.

Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense decreased by $133,000, or 0.7%, from $18.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, to $18.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011.


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,				Dollar			Percent
	2011		2010		Change			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits	$	11,751	$	11,843	$	(92	)		(0.8	%)
Advertising		351		280		71			25.4
Occupancy and equipment		1,511		1,520		(9	)		(0.6	)
Outside professional services		769		648		121			18.7
Regulatory assessments		409		819		(410	)		(50.1	)
Data processing		1,168		1,036		132			12.7
Office operations		1,521		1,458		63			4.3
Other		1,087		1,096		(9	)		(0.8	)

	$	18,567	$	18,700	$	(133	)		(0.7	%)

The decrease in non-interest expense was primarily due to a $410,000, or 50.1%, decline in regulatory assessments, due to the new FDIC fee structure, which uses assets less Tier One capital as an assessment base and resulted in a lower rate. Outside professional services expense increased primarily due to an accrual for the settlement and estimated legal expenses related to litigation. The accrual is attributable to expenses related to a class action lawsuit alleging that the Company, the Bank and VPM improperly classified VPM’s mortgage loan officers as exempt employees under the FLSA, and thereby failed to properly compensate them for overtime. At a mediation in September 2011 and without admitting liability, the parties agreed to settle the matter for $350,000. A $132,000 increase in data processing expense was primarily attributable to increased software license renewal costs.

Partially offsetting these increases was a $92,000 decrease in salaries and employee benefits expense, as the Company paid $820,000 less in bonuses during the third quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, which was partially offset by a $656,000 increase in salary expense primarily due to higher average merit increases and staffing increases, as well as new community bank offices opened in Carrollton and Flower Mound. Over the past year, we continued to hire new community bank presidents with experience in commercial and industrial lending, as well as additional compliance and back-office staff to assist in meeting our business strategies and to comply with increased regulatory requirements. The decline in bonus expense is due to a reduction in the payment of variable incentives that are tied to mortgage production; this decrease offsets the decline in the net gain on sale of mortgage loans.

Page 50 of 69

Income Tax Expense. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized income tax expense of $2.4 million on our pre-tax income, which was an effective tax rate of 31.8%, compared to income tax expense of $2.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, which was an effective tax rate of 33.4%. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to various immaterial adjustments to income tax expense recorded during the period.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Nine months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

General. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was $16.6 million, an increase of $5.3 million, or 46.4%, from net income of $11.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, included a $2.2 million net of tax gain on the sale of available for sale securities. The increase in net income was driven by higher net interest income, the gain on sale of securities and a lower provision for loan losses and was partially offset by a $4.0 million decline in the net gain on sales of loans and a $1.5 million increase in noninterest expense. Our basic and diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was $0.51, a $0.13 increase from $0.38 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Interest Income. Interest income increased by $860,000, or 1.0%, from $84.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, to $84.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				Dollar			Percent
	2011		2010		Change			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest and dividend income
Loans, including fees	$	63,132	$	64,921	$	(1,789	)		(2.8	%)
Securities		21,559		18,715		2,844			15.2
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions		144		344		(200	)		(58.1	)
FHLB stock		52		47		5			10.6

	$	84,887	$	84,027	$	860			1.0	%

The increase in interest income was driven by a $2.8 million, or 15.2%, increase in the interest income earned on securities, which was primarily attributable to a $4.1 million increase in the interest earned on agency collateralized mortgage obligations. Although the average rate on collateralized mortgage obligations declined by 58 basis points from the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2011, the average balance increased by $364.8 million. This increase in interest income from securities was partially offset by a $1.8 million decline in interest income earned from loans. The average balance of Warehouse Purchase Program loans decreased by $12.6 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2010, to the same period this year. Also, the rate earned on Warehouse Purchase Program loans decreased by 36 basis points, from 4.89% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to 4.53% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Declines in the interest earned on loans held for sale, one-to four-family mortgages and consumer loans were partially offset by a $1.9 million increase in the interest earned on commercial real estate loans. The average balance of commercial real estate loans increased by $35.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period last year, and the average rate increased by three basis points. Interest earned on commercial and industrial loans increased by $310,000 due to a $5.4 million increase in volume and a 17 basis point increase in average rate during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period last year. Overall, the yield on interest-earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, decreased by 47 basis points, from 4.59% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, to 4.12%.

Page 51 of 69

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased by $7.5 million, or 22.1%, from $34.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, to $26.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				Dollar			Percent
	2011		2010		Change			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest expense
Deposits	$	18,045	$	23,834	$	(5,789	)		(24.3	%)
FHLB advances		7,360		9,071		(1,711	)		(18.9	)
Repurchase agreement		611		610		1			—
Other borrowings		450		449		1			—

	$	26,466	$	33,964	$	(7,498	)		(22.1	%)

The decrease was primarily caused by a $5.8 million, or 24.3%, decrease in the interest expense paid on deposits. Although volume increased in interest-bearing demand, savings and money market accounts and remained relatively constant in time deposits during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same time last year, lower rates paid on all deposit categories offset the increase in balances. Interest expense paid on Absolute Checking only increased by $92,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period last year, although the average balance in this product increased by $111.6 million. Interest cost on this product was reduced through gradual rate reductions throughout the past year. Effective on September 1, 2011, interest was paid on Absolute Checking balances at 3.00% APY on balances up to $25,000, 0.30% for balances between $25,001 to $100,000 and 0.03% on balances greater than $100,000 and non-qualifying accounts, compared to 4.00% APY on balances up to $50,000, 0.95% on balances between $50,001 and $100,000 and 0.04% on balances greater than $100,000 and non-qualifying accounts in September 2010. Also, over the past year, the Company has decreased the rate paid on certain money market accounts from a range of 0.95% to 5.50% at September 30, 2010 to a range of 0.30% to 1.25% at September 30, 2011.

Interest expense on FHLB advances decreased by $1.7 million, or 18.9%, as the average rate paid on borrowings decreased by 90 basis points, from 3.72% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, to 2.82% for the same period in 2011. In November 2010, $91.6 million in fixed-rate FHLB advances were modified. These advances, which had a weighted average rate of 4.15%, were prepaid and restructured with $91.6 million of new, lower-cost FHLB advances with a weighted average rate of 1.79%, which contributed to the reduction in interest expense paid on FHLB advances. The average rate paid on borrowings was further impacted by the strategic decision to fund a portion of the Warehouse Purchase Program loans with short-term advances. Overall, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 60 basis points, from 2.17% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, to 1.57% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased by $8.3 million, or 16.7%, to $58.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from $50.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The net interest rate spread increased 13 basis points to 2.55% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from 2.42% for the same period last year. The net interest margin increased ten basis points to 2.84% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, from 2.74% for the same period last year. The increase in the net interest rate spread and margin was primarily attributable to lower deposit and borrowing rates.

Page 52 of 69

Average Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011								2010
	Average								Average
	Outstanding			Interest					Outstanding			Interest
	Balance			Earned/Paid		Yield/Rate			Balance			Earned/Paid		Yield/Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
One- to four- family real estate	$	379,074		$	15,198		5.35	%	$	392,530		$	16,303		5.54	%
Warehouse Purchase Program loans held for sale		317,630			10,801		4.53			330,197			12,115		4.89
ViewPoint Mortgage loans held for sale		21,744			835		5.12			39,041			1,370		4.68
Commercial real estate		504,343			25,424		6.72			468,749			23,522		6.69
Home equity/home improvement		140,953			6,089		5.76			131,511			5,998		6.08
Consumer		55,946			2,794		6.66			83,752			3,932		6.26
Commercial and industrial		40,676			1,991		6.53			35,229			1,681		6.36
Less: deferred fees and allowance for loan loss		(15,543	)		—		—			(14,056	)		—		—

Loans receivable ¹		1,444,823			63,132		5.83			1,466,953			64,921		5.90
Agency mortgage-backed securities		468,553			9,796		2.79			447,733			10,148		3.02
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations		677,082			10,064		1.98			312,331			5,993		2.56
Investment securities		63,437			1,699		3.57			101,986			2,574		3.37
FHLB stock		16,932			52		0.41			15,322			47		0.41
Interest-earning deposit accounts		76,170			144		0.25			94,213			344		0.49

Total interest-earning assets		2,746,997			84,887		4.12			2,438,538			84,027		4.59


Non-interest-earning assets		137,055								162,444


Total assets	$	2,884,052							$	2,600,982


Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand	$	464,261			6,623		1.90		$	353,841			6,590		2.48
Savings and money market		731,869			2,901		0.53			716,254			7,472		1.39
Time		650,843			8,521		1.75			653,312			9,772		1.99
Borrowings		397,658			8,421		2.82			362,905			10,130		3.72

Total interest-bearing liabilities		2,244,631			26,466		1.57			2,086,312			33,964		2.17


Non-interest-bearing checking		192,184								181,705


Non-interest-bearing liabilities		38,257								52,407


Total liabilities		2,475,072								2,320,424


Total shareholders’ equity		408,980								280,558


Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	2,884,052							$	2,600,982


Net interest income and margin				$	58,421		2.84	%				$	50,063		2.74	%


Net interest income and margin (tax-equivalent basis)²				$	58,944		2.86	%				$	50,457		2.76	%

Net interest rate spread							2.55	%							2.42	%
Net earning assets	$	502,366							$	352,226

Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		122.38	%							116.88	%


¹		Calculated net of deferred fees, loan discounts, loans in process and allowance for loan losses. Construction loans have been included in the one- to four- family and commercial real estate line items, as appropriate.

²		In order to make pretax income and resultant yields on tax-exempt investments and loans comparable to those on taxable investments and loans, a tax-equivalent adjustment has been computed using a federal income tax rate of 35% for 2011 and 2010. Tax-exempt investments and loans had average balances of $52.7 million and $38.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Page 53 of 69

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following schedule presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It distinguishes between the changes related to outstanding balances and those due to changes in interest rates. The change in interest attributable to rate has been determined by applying the change in rate between periods to average balances outstanding in the prior period. The change in interest due to volume has been determined by applying the rate from the earlier period to the change in average balances outstanding between periods. Changes attributable to both rate and volume which cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011 versus 2010
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
							Total
							Increase
	Volume			Rate			(Decrease)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
One- to four- family real estate	$	(549	)	$	(556	)	$	(1,105	)
Warehouse Purchase Program loans held for sale		(450	)		(864	)		(1,314	)
ViewPoint Mortgage loans held for sale		(654	)		119			(535	)
Commercial real estate		1,794			108			1,902
Home equity/home improvement		418			(327	)		91
Consumer		(1,375	)		237			(1,138	)
Commercial and industrial		266			44			310

Loans receivable		(550	)		(1,239	)		(1,789	)
Agency mortgage-backed securities		458			(810	)		(352	)
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations		5,677			(1,606	)		4,071
Investment securities		(1,024	)		149			(875	)
FHLB stock		5			—			5
Interest-earning deposit accounts		(57	)		(143	)		(200	)

Total interest-earning assets		4,509			(3,649	)		860


Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand		1,781			(1,748	)		33
Savings and money market		159			(4,730	)		(4,571	)
Time		(37	)		(1,214	)		(1,251	)
Borrowings		904			(2,613	)		(1,709	)

Total interest-bearing liabilities		2,807			(10,305	)		(7,498	)


Net interest income	$	1,702		$	6,656		$	8,358

Page 54 of 69

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses was $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, a decrease of $1.0 million, or 27.7%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The balance of the allowance for loan losses increased by $1.9 million from September 30, 2010, to September 30, 2011, as management increased qualitative factors due to the continued weak economic conditions. Despite these trends, the Company has not seen an increase in charge-offs, as net charge-offs declined by $456,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period last year.

Page 55 of 69

Non-interest Income. Non-interest income decreased by $469,000, or 1.9%, from $24.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, to $24.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						Dollar			Percent
	2011			2010			Change			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest income
Service charges and fees	$	14,027		$	13,838		$	189			1.4	%
Other charges and fees		544			509			35			6.9
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans		5,538			9,517			(3,979	)		(41.8	)
Bank-owned life insurance income		403			305			98			32.1
Gain on sale of available for sale securities		3,415			—			3,415			N/M
Loss on sale and disposition of assets		(749	)		(365	)		(384	)		(105.2	)
Impairment of goodwill		(271	)		—			(271	)		—
Other		1,403			975			428			43.9

	$	24,310		$	24,779		$	(469	)		(1.9	%)

The decrease in non-interest income was primarily due to a $4.0 million, or 41.8%, decline in the net gain on sale of mortgage loans, as VPM sold $197.7 million in loans to outside investors during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $288.0 million during the same period in 2010. The decrease in sales can be attributed to the lower volume of one- to four-family loan originations in 2011 compared to the volume experienced during the prior year. This decline in non-interest income was partially offset by a $3.4 million gain on the sale of 17 mortgage-backed securities and six collateralized mortgage obligations in February 2011.

In June 2011, the Company impaired its goodwill by $271,000, reducing the goodwill balance from $1.1 million at December 31, 2010, to $818,000 at September 30, 2011. The goodwill resulted from the Bank’s 2007 purchase of the assets of Bankers Financial Mortgage Group, Ltd (now VPM). Due to the downturn in mortgage market conditions, reduced earnings and loan production personnel changes, the Company performed an evaluation of its goodwill outside of the normal annual review cycle. This evaluation showed a $271,000 excess of carrying value of the goodwill over its fair value.

Loss on sale and disposition of assets increased by $384,000 primarily due to value declines related to a commercial real estate foreclosed asset. In addition, non-sufficient funds fees declined by $1.3 million caused by lower volume, offset by a $969,000 increase in debit card income, a $579,000 increase in commercial fee income, which resulted from pre-payment penalties on commercial real estate loans, and a $142,000 increase in Warehouse Purchase Program fees. Other non-interest income increased by $428,000 primarily due to an $798,000 increase in the value of equity investments in two community development-oriented venture capital funds used for Community Reinvestment Act purposes.

Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased by $1.5 million, or 2.7%, from $54.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, to $55.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				Dollar			Percent
	2011		2010		Change			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits	$	35,147	$	34,476	$	671			1.9	%
Advertising		1,217		878		339			38.6
Occupancy and equipment		4,333		4,467		(134	)		(3.0	)
Outside professional services		2,126		1,591		535			33.6
Regulatory assessments		1,866		2,409		(543	)		(22.5	)
Data processing		3,366		3,081		285			9.3
Office operations		4,452		4,337		115			2.7
Other		3,189		2,980		209			7.0

	$	55,696	$	54,219	$	1,477			2.7	%

Page 56 of 69

The increase in non-interest expense was primarily due to a $671,000, or 1.9%, increase in salaries and employee benefits expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010, which increased primarily due to higher average merit increases and staffing increases, as well as new community bank offices opened in Carrollton and Flower Mound. A staff reduction at VPM due to the decline in loan production offset salary increases by $336,000. Over the past year, we continued to hire new community bank presidents with experience in commercial and industrial lending, as well as additional compliance and back-office staff to assist in meeting our business strategies and to comply with increased regulatory requirements. Additionally, ESOP expense increased by $600,000 due to the shares purchased by the ESOP in the Conversion on July 6, 2010.

Outside professional services expense increased by $535,000, or 33.6%, during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010, primarily due to settlement and estimated legal expenses related to litigation. The majority is attributable to expenses related to a class action lawsuit alleging that the Company, the Bank and VPM improperly classified VPM’s mortgage loan officers as exempt employees under the FLSA, and thereby failed to properly compensate them for overtime. At a mediation in September 2011 and without admitting liability, the parties agreed to settle the matter for $350,000. These increases were partially offset by a $543,000 reduction in regulatory assessments due to the new FDIC fee structure, which uses assets less Tier One capital as an assessment base and resulted in a lower rate.

Income Tax Expense. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized income tax expense of $7.7 million on our pre-tax income, which was an effective tax rate of 31.9%, compared to income tax expense of $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, which was an effective tax rate of 32.8%. The decline in the effective tax rate was primarily due to various immaterial adjustments to income tax expense recorded during the period.

Liquidity

Management maintains a liquidity position that it believes will adequately provide funding for loan demand and deposit run-off that may occur in the normal course of business. The Company relies on a number of different sources in order to meet its potential liquidity demands. The primary sources are increases in deposit accounts and cash flows from loan payments and the securities portfolio.

Planning for the Company’s normal business liquidity needs, both expected and unexpected, is done on a daily and short-term basis through the cash management function. On a longer-term basis it is accomplished through the budget and strategic planning functions, with support from internal asset/liability management software model projections.

The Liquidity Committee adds liquidity contingency planning to the process by focusing on possible scenarios that would stress liquidity beyond the Bank’s normal business liquidity needs. These scenarios may include local/regional adversity and national adversity situations while focusing on high probability-high impact, high probability-low impact, and low probability-high impact stressors.

Management recognizes that the events and their severity of liquidity stress leading up to and occurring during a liquidity stress event cannot be precisely defined or listed. Nevertheless, management believes that liquidity stress events can be categorized into sources and levels of severity, with responses that apply to various situations.

In addition to the primary sources of funds, management has several secondary sources available to meet potential funding requirements. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had an additional borrowing capacity of $1.34 billion with the FHLB. The Company may also use the discount window at the Federal Reserve Bank as a source of short-term funding. Federal Reserve Bank borrowing capacity varies based upon collateral pledged to the discount window line. As of September 30, 2011, collateral pledged had a market value of $35.1 million. Also, at September 30, 2011, the Company had $76.0 million in federal funds lines of credit available with other financial institutions.

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had classified 54.9% of its securities portfolio as available for sale, providing an additional source of liquidity. Management believes that because active markets exist and our securities portfolio is of high quality, our available for sale securities are marketable. In addition, we have historically sold mortgage loans in the secondary market to reduce interest rate risk and to create still another source of liquidity.

Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. Excess liquidity is generally invested in short-term investments, such as overnight deposits and federal funds. On a longer term basis, we maintain a strategy of investing in various lending products and investment securities, including mortgage-backed securities. Participations in loans we originate, including portions of commercial real estate loans, are sold to manage borrower concentration risk as well as interest rate risk.

Page 57 of 69

The Company is a separate legal entity from the Bank and must provide for its own liquidity. In addition to its operating expenses, the Company is responsible for paying any dividends declared to its shareholders and interest and principal on outstanding debt. The Company’s primary source of funds consists of the net proceeds retained by the Company from our initial public offering in 2006 and our 2010 Conversion and offering. We also have the ability to receive dividends or capital distributions from the Bank, although we are subject to regulatory limitations governing the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. At September 30, 2011, the Company (on an unconsolidated basis) had liquid assets of $78.7 million.

The Company uses its sources of funds primarily to meet its ongoing commitments, pay maturing deposits and fund withdrawals, and fund loan commitments. At September 30, 2011, the total approved but unfunded loan commitments (including Warehouse Purchase Program commitments) and unused lines of credit outstanding amounted to $371.9 million and $85.2 million, respectively, as compared to $395.8 million and $79.2 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2010. It is management’s policy to offer deposit rates that are competitive with other local financial institutions. Based on this management strategy, we believe that a majority of maturing deposits will remain with the Company. Certificates of deposit at September 30, 2011, scheduled to mature in one year or less totaled $460.0 million with a weighted average rate of 1.34%.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, cash and cash equivalents decreased by $14.5 million, or 21.1%, from $68.7 million as of December 31, 2010, to $54.2 million as of September 30, 2011. Cash provided by financing activities of $254.7 million was offset by cash used for operating activities of $156.2 million and cash used for investing activities of $113.0 million. Primary sources of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, included proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale of $5.35 billion (primarily related to our Warehouse Purchase Program), proceeds from FHLB advances of $422.0 million, maturities, prepayments and calls of securities totaling $178.8 million and proceeds from the sale of securities of $93.0 million. Primary uses of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, included loans originated or purchased for sale of $5.55 billion (primarily related to our Warehouse Purchase Program), purchases of securities totaling $313.4 million and repayments on FHLB advances of $211.5 million.

Please see Item 1A (Risk Factors) under Part 1 of the 2010 Form 10-K for information regarding liquidity risk.

Page 58 of 69

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table presents our longer term, non-deposit related contractual obligations and commitments to extend credit to our borrowers, in the aggregate, by payment due dates (not including any interest amounts).


	September 30, 2011
	Less than		One through		Four through		After Five
	One Year		Three Years		Five Years		Years		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Contractual obligations:
FHLB advances (gross of restructuring prepayment penalty of $4,481)	$	410,624	$	84,504	$	95,374	$	85,740	$	676,242
Repurchase agreement		—		—		—		25,000		25,000
Other borrowings		—		—		10,000		—		10,000
Operating leases (premises)		1,353		2,183		1,509		4,572		9,617

Total advances and operating leases	$	411,977	$	86,687	$	106,883	$	115,312		720,859


Off-balance sheet loan commitments: ⁽¹⁾
Undisbursed portions of loans closed	$	41,082	$	—	$	—	$	—		41,082
Commitments to originate loans		114,092		—		—		—		114,092
Unused commitment on Warehouse Purchase Program loans		216,706		—		—		—		216,706
Unused lines of credit		85,169		—		—		—		85,169

Total loan commitments	$	457,049	$	—	$	—	$	—		457,049

Total contractual obligations and loan commitments									$	1,177,908


⁽¹⁾		Loans having no stated maturity are reported in the “Less than One Year” category

In addition, the Company had overdraft protection available in the amounts of $71.5 million and $72.4 million at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Capital Resources

The Bank is subject to minimum capital requirements imposed by the OCC (and our predecessor regulator, the OTS). Consistent with our goal to operate a sound and profitable organization, our policy is for the Bank to maintain a “well-capitalized” status under the capital categories of our regulators. Based on capital levels at September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Bank was considered to be well-capitalized.

At September 30, 2011, the Bank’s equity totaled $313.9 million. Management monitors the capital levels of the Bank to provide for current and future business opportunities and to meet regulatory guidelines for “well-capitalized” institutions.

The Company’s equity totaled $406.7 million, or 12.6% of total assets, at September 30, 2011. The Company is not subject to any specific capital requirements; however, our regulators expect the Company to support the Bank, including providing additional capital to the Bank when appropriate.

Page 59 of 69

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, actual and required capital levels and ratios were as follows for the Bank only:


											To Be Well-Capitalized
						Required for Capital					Under Prompt Corrective
	Actual					Adequacy Purposes					Action Regulations
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in Thousands)
As of September 30, 2011:

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		317,546		16.98	%		149,628		8.00	%		187,036		10.00	%
Tier 1 (core) capital (to risk-weighted assets)		303,829		16.24	%		74,814		4.00	%		112,221		6.00	%
Tier 1 (core) capital (to adjusted total assets)		303,829		9.43	%		128,880		4.00	%		161,100		5.00	%

As of December 31, 2010:

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		298,739		18.42	%		129,717		8.00	%		162,147		10.00	%
Tier 1 (core) capital (to risk-weighted assets)		285,494		17.61	%		64,859		4.00	%		97,288		6.00	%
Tier 1 (core) capital (to adjusted total assets)		285,494		9.73	%		117,320		4.00	%		146,650		5.00	%

Impact of Inflation

The effects of price changes and inflation can vary substantially for most financial institutions. While management believes that inflation affects the economic value of total assets, it believes that it is difficult to assess the overall impact. Management believes this to be the case due to the fact that generally neither the timing nor the magnitude of changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”) coincides with changes in interest rates or asset values. For example, the price of one or more of the components of the CPI may fluctuate considerably, influencing composite CPI, without having a corresponding effect on interest rates, asset values, or the cost of those goods and services normally purchased by the Bank. In years of high inflation, intermediate and long-term interest rates tend to increase, adversely impacting the market values of investment securities, mortgage loans and other long-term fixed rate loans. In addition, short-term interest rates tend to increase, impacting the cost of funds. In other years, the opposite may occur.

Page 60 of 69

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Asset/Liability Management

Our Risk When Interest Rates Change. The rates of interest we earn on assets and pay on liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Market rates change over time. Like other financial institutions, our results of operations are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities. The risk associated with changes in interest rates and our ability to adapt to these changes is known as interest rate risk and is our most significant market risk.

How We Measure Our Risk of Interest Rate Changes. As part of our attempt to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates and comply with applicable regulations, we monitor our interest rate risk. In doing so, we analyze and manage assets and liabilities based on their interest rates and contractual cash flows, timing of maturities, prepayment potential, repricing opportunities, and sensitivity to actual or potential changes in market interest rates.

The Company is subject to interest rate risk to the extent that its interest bearing liabilities, primarily deposits and FHLB advances and other borrowings, reprice more rapidly or slowly, or at different rates than its interest earning assets, primarily loans and investment securities. The Bank calculates interest rate risk by entering relevant contractual and projected information into the asset/liability management software simulation model. Data required by the model includes balance, rate, pay down schedule, and maturity. For items that contractually reprice, the repricing index, spread, and frequency are entered, including any initial, periodic, and lifetime interest rate caps and floors.

In order to monitor and manage the potential for adverse effects of material prolonged increases or decreases in interest rates on our results of operations, the Bank has adopted an asset and liability management policy. The Board of Directors sets the asset and liability policy for the Bank, which is implemented by the Asset/Liability Management Committee.

The purpose of the Asset/Liability Management Committee is to monitor, communicate, coordinate, and direct asset/liability management consistent with our business plan and board-approved policies. The committee directs and monitors the volume and mix of assets and funding sources, taking into account relative costs and spreads, interest rate sensitivity and liquidity needs. The objectives are to manage assets and funding sources to produce results that are consistent with liquidity, capital adequacy, growth, risk, and profitability goals.

The Committee generally meets on a bimonthly basis to, among other things, protect capital through earnings stability over the interest rate cycle; maintain our well-capitalized status; and provide a reasonable return on investment. The Committee recommends appropriate strategy changes based on this review. The Committee is responsible for reviewing and reporting the effects of the policy implementations and strategies to the Board of Directors at least quarterly. In addition, two outside members of the Board of Directors are on the Asset/Liability Management Committee. Senior managers oversee the process on a daily basis.

A key element of the Bank’s asset/liability management strategy is to protect net earnings by managing the inherent maturity and repricing mismatches between its interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. The Bank manages earnings exposure through the addition of adjustable rate loans and investment securities, through the sale of certain fixed rate loans in the secondary market, and by entering into appropriate term FHLB advance agreements.

As part of its efforts to monitor and manage interest rate risk, the Bank uses the economic value of equity (“EVE”) methodology adopted by the OCC as part of its capital regulations. In essence, this approach calculates the difference between the present value of expected cash flows from assets and liabilities. Management and the Board of Directors review EVE measurements at least quarterly to determine whether the Bank’s interest rate exposure is within the limits established by the Board of Directors.

The Bank’s asset/liability management strategy sets acceptable limits for the percentage change in EVE given changes in interest rates. For instantaneous, parallel, and sustained interest rate increases and decreases of 100 and 200 basis points, the Bank’s policy indicates that the EVE ratio should not fall below 7.00% and 6.00%, respectively, and for an increase of 300 basis points the EVE ratio should not fall below 5.00%. As illustrated in the tables below, the Bank was within policy limits for all scenarios tested. The tables presented below, as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, are internal analyses of our interest rate risk as measured by changes in EVE for instantaneous, parallel, and sustained shifts for all market rates and yield curves, in 100 basis point increments, up 300 basis points and down 200 basis points.

Page 61 of 69

As illustrated in the tables below, our EVE would be negatively impacted by a parallel, instantaneous, and sustained increase in market rates. Such an increase in rates would negatively impact EVE as a result of the duration of assets, including fixed rate residential mortgage loans, extending longer than the duration of liabilities, primarily deposit accounts and FHLB borrowings. As interest rates rise, the market value of fixed rate loans declines due to higher discount rates and anticipated slowing loan prepayment rates.

We have implemented a strategic plan to mitigate interest rate risk. This plan includes the ongoing review of our mix of fixed rate versus variable rate loans, investments, deposits, and borrowings. When available and appropriate, high quality adjustable rate assets are purchased. These assets reduce our sensitivity to upward interest rate shocks. On the liability side of the balance sheet, term borrowings are added as appropriate. These borrowings will be of a size and term so as to mitigate the impact of duration mismatches, reducing our sensitivity to upward interest rate shocks. These strategies are implemented as needed and as opportunities arise to mitigate interest rate risk without materially sacrificing earnings.


September 30, 2011
Change in
Interest
Rates in
Basis											EVE
Points			Economic Value of Equity								Ratio %
			$ Amount		$ Change			% Change
(Dollars in Thousands)
	400			385,884		(17,139	)		(4.25	)		12.90
	300			395,059		(7,964	)		(1.98	)		12.79
	200			409,199		6,176			1.53			12.96
	100			415,562		12,539			3.11			12.89
	—			403,023		—			—			12.28
	(100	)		382,727		(20,296	)		(5.04	)		11.53
	(200	)		342,153		(60,870	)		(15.10	)		10.26


December 31, 2010
Change in
Interest
Rates in
Basis											EVE
Points			Economic Value of Equity								Ratio %
			$ Amount		$ Change			% Change
(Dollars in Thousands)
	400			216,942		(108,087	)		(33.25	)		8.03
	300			244,653		(80,376	)		(24.73	)		8.84
	200			276,441		(48,588	)		(14.95	)		9.75
	100			304,179		(20,850	)		(6.41	)		10.48
	—			325,029		—			—			10.96
	(100	)		327,497		2,468			0.76			10.89
	(200	)		326,489		1,460			0.45			10.74

The Bank’s EVE was $403.0 million, or 12.28%, of the market value of portfolio assets as of September 30, 2011, a $78.0 million increase from $325.0 million, or 10.96%, of the market value of portfolio assets as of December 31, 2010. Based upon the assumptions utilized, an immediate 200 basis point increase in market interest rates would result in a $6.2 million increase in our EVE at September 30, 2011, as compared to a decrease of $48.6 million at December 31, 2010, and would result in a 68 basis point increase in our EVE ratio to 12.96% at September 30, 2011, as compared to a 121 basis point decrease to 9.75% at December 31, 2010. An immediate 200 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in a $60.9 million decrease in our EVE at September 30, 2011, compared to a $1.5 million increase at December 31, 2010, and would result in a 202 basis point decrease in our EVE ratio to 10.26% at September 30, 2011, as compared to a 22 basis point decrease in our EVE ratio to 10.74% at December 31, 2010.

Page 62 of 69

Between the September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010 EVE measurements, a study of the Bank’s non-maturity deposit accounts was completed. In this study, decay rates, repricing betas, and customer behavior were analyzed over time on an individual account level basis. The results were aggregated by product, with recommendations which were subsequently implemented. The updated account assumptions resulted in an increase to the overall projected duration of the non-maturity deposit account portfolio.

In addition to monitoring selected measures of EVE, management also calculates and monitors potential effects on net interest income resulting from increases or decreases in rates. This process is used in conjunction with EVE measures to identify interest rate risk on both a global and account level basis. In managing our mix of assets and liabilities, while considering the relationship between long and short term interest rates, market conditions, and consumer preferences, we may place somewhat greater emphasis on maintaining or increasing the Bank’s net interest margin than on strictly matching the interest rate sensitivity of its assets and liabilities.

Management also believes that at times the increased net income which may result from an acceptable mismatch in the actual maturity, repricing, or duration of its asset and liability portfolios can provide sufficient returns to justify the increased exposure to sudden and unexpected changes in interest rates which may result from such a mismatch. Management believes that the Bank’s level of interest rate risk is acceptable under this approach.

In evaluating the Bank’s exposure to interest rate movements, certain shortcomings inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table must be considered. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or repricing characteristics, their interest rate drivers may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates (basis risk). Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgages, have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset (initial, periodic, and lifetime caps and floors). Further, in the event of a significant change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels may deviate significantly from those assumed above. Finally, the ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase. The Bank considers all of these factors in monitoring its exposure to interest rate risk.

Also of note, the current historically low interest rate environment has resulted in asymmetrical interest rate risk as certain repricing liabilities cannot be fully shocked downward. Assets with prepayment options are being monitored. Current and historical market rates and customer behavior are being considered in the management of interest rate risk.

The Board of Directors and management believe that the Bank’s ability to successfully manage and mitigate its exposure to interest rate risk is strengthened by several key factors. For example, the Bank manages its balance sheet duration and overall interest rate risk by placing a preference on originating and retaining adjustable rate loans and selling originated fixed rate residential mortgage loans. In addition, the Bank borrows at various maturities from the FHLB to mitigate mismatches between the asset and liability portfolios. Furthermore, the investment securities portfolio is used as a primary interest rate risk management tool through the duration and repricing targeting of purchases and sales.

Page 63 of 69

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2011. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. There has been no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

While the Company believes the present design of its disclosure controls and procedures is effective to achieve its goals, future events affecting its business may cause the Company to modify its disclosure controls and procedures. The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns in controls or procedures can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual actions of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Page 64 of 69

PART 2 — OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.		Legal Proceedings

We are involved from time to time as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of our businesses. While the ultimate outcome of pending proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel representing us in such proceedings, that the resolution of these proceedings should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.


Item 1.A.		Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The table below sets forth information regarding the Company’s common stock repurchases during the quarter pursuant to its existing stock repurchase plan.


					Total Number of		Maximum Number
					Shares Purchased as		of Shares that May
	Total Number		Average		Part of Publicly		Yet Be Purchased
	of Shares		Price Paid per		Announced Plans or		Under the Plans or
Period	Purchased		Share		Programs		Programs
July 1, 2011 to July 31, 2011		0	$	—		0		0
August 1, 2011 to August 31, 2011		0		—		0		1,741,975
September 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011		577,000		11.70		577,000		1,164,975

Total		577,000	$	11.70		577,000		1,164,975


Item 3.		Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.


Item 4.		(Removed and Reserved)


Item 5.		Other Information

Not applicable.

Page 65 of 69


Item 6.		Exhibits


Exhibit
Number		Description

	2.1	Amended and Restated Plan of Conversion and Reorganization of ViewPoint MHC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 4, 2010 (File No. 001-32992))

	3.1	Charter of the Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165509))

	3.2	Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-165509))

	4.0	Certificate of Registrant’s Common Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.0 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-165509))

	10.1	Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Garold R. Base (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 4, 2006 (File No. 001-32992))

	10.2	Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Garold R. Base (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 10, 2008 (File No. 001-32992))

	10.3	Employment Agreement by and between ViewPoint Bank, the Registrant’s wholly owned operating subsidiary, and Garold R. Base (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 4, 2006 (File No. 001-32992))

	10.4	Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between ViewPoint Bank, the Registrant’s wholly owned operating subsidiary, and Garold R. Base (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 10, 2008 (File No. 001-32992))

	10.5	Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between ViewPoint Bank, the Registrant’s wholly owned operating subsidiary, and Garold R. Base (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 6, 2008 (File No. 001-32992))

	10.6	Form of Severance Agreement between ViewPoint Bank and the following executive officers: Pathie E. McKee, Mark E. Hord, James C. Parks and Mark L. Williamson (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 17, 2011 (File No. 001-34737))

	10.7	Amendment to Form of Severance Agreement between ViewPoint Bank and the following executive officers: Pathie E. McKee, Mark E. Hord, James C. Parks and Mark L. Williamson (incorporated herein by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 6, 2011 (File No. 001-34737))

	10.8	Summary of Director Board Fee Arrangements (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 9, 2007 (File No. 001-32992))

	10.9	ViewPoint Bank Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 0-24566-01))

	10.10	Amended and Restated ViewPoint Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 0-24566-01))

	10.11	Executive Officer Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2011 (File No. 001-34737))

	10.12	Form of promissory note between ViewPoint Financial Group and four lenders, totaling $10 million (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 22, 2009 (File No. 001-32992))

Page 66 of 69


Exhibit
Number			Description

	11		Statement regarding computation of per share earnings (See Note 3 of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Interim Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q).

	31.1		Rule 13a — 14(a)/15d — 14(a) Certification (Chief Executive Officer)

	31.2		Rule 13a — 14(a)/15d — 14(a) Certification (Chief Financial Officer)

	32		Section 1350 Certifications

	101	+ ++	The following materials from the ViewPoint Financial Group, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (vi) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vii) related notes, tagged as blocks of text.


+		This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

++		As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Page 67 of 69

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


ViewPoint Financial Group, Inc.
(Registrant)

Date: October 27, 2011		/s/ Garold R. Base Garold R. Base
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Duly Authorized Officer)

Date: October 27, 2011		/s/ Pathie E. McKee Pathie E. McKee
		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Page 68 of 69

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibits:

	31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

	31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

	32.0		Section 1350 Certifications

	101	+ ++	The following materials from the ViewPoint Financial Group, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (vi) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vii) related notes, tagged as blocks of text.


+		This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

++		As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Page 69 of 69

LegacyTexas Financial Group, Inc. - FORM 10-Q - October 27, 2011

Attached files

LegacyTexas Financial Group, Inc. Reports

Also read