Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Southeastern Bank Financial CORP | Financial_Report.xls |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Southeastern Bank Financial CORP | c19211exv31w1.htm |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Southeastern Bank Financial CORP | c19211exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Southeastern Bank Financial CORP | c19211exv31w2.htm |
Table of Contents
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ
|
Quarterly Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011. | ||
or | ||
o
|
Transition Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
For the transition period from to . |
Commission File No. 0-24172
Southeastern Bank Financial Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia | 58-2005097 | |
(State of Incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3530 Wheeler Road, Augusta, Georgia 30909
(Address of principal executive offices)
(706) 738-6990
(Issuers telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the issuer is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act): Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common equity, as of
the latest practicable date:
6,677,059 shares of common stock, $3.00 par value per share, outstanding as of July 28, 2011.
SOUTHEASTERN BANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
37 | ||||||||
65 | ||||||||
65 | ||||||||
66 | ||||||||
66 | ||||||||
66 | ||||||||
66 | ||||||||
66 | ||||||||
66 | ||||||||
67 | ||||||||
68 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
* | No information submitted under this caption |
1
Table of Contents
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
SOUTHEASTERN BANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | December 31, | |||||||
(Unaudited) | 2010 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 61,141 | $ | 42,305 | ||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
8,543 | 22,810 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
69,684 | 65,115 | ||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||
Available-for-sale |
569,500 | 586,302 | ||||||
Held-to-maturity, at cost (fair values of
$0 and $311, respectively) |
| 310 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
15,913 | 12,775 | ||||||
Loans |
873,801 | 874,095 | ||||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
28,410 | 26,657 | ||||||
Loans, net |
845,391 | 847,438 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
28,546 | 29,416 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
6,290 | 6,382 | ||||||
Bank-owned life insurance |
30,144 | 24,178 | ||||||
Restricted equity securities |
5,454 | 5,707 | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
8,558 | 7,751 | ||||||
Prepaid FDIC assessment |
3,886 | 4,784 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
12,917 | 14,595 | ||||||
Other assets |
3,638 | 2,352 | ||||||
$ | 1,599,921 | $ | 1,607,105 | |||||
2
Table of Contents
SOUTHEASTERN BANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | December 31, | |||||||
(Unaudited) | 2010 | |||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Deposits |
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing |
$ | 131,328 | $ | 120,139 | ||||
Interest-bearing: |
||||||||
NOW accounts |
343,400 | 356,267 | ||||||
Savings |
466,264 | 409,584 | ||||||
Money management accounts |
39,266 | 36,937 | ||||||
Time deposits over $100 |
304,424 | 346,721 | ||||||
Other time deposits |
117,318 | 141,089 | ||||||
1,402,000 | 1,410,737 | |||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
611 | 818 | ||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
52,000 | 60,000 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
12,641 | 12,645 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures |
22,947 | 22,947 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,490,199 | 1,507,147 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares
authorized; 0 shares outstanding in 2011 and
2010, respectively |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $3.00 par value; 10,000,000 shares
authorized; 6,676,467 and 6,675,147 shares issued
and outstanding in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
20,029 | 20,025 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
62,691 | 62,618 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
24,656 | 19,548 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net |
2,346 | (2,233 | ) | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
109,722 | 99,958 | ||||||
$ | 1,599,921 | $ | 1,607,105 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
SOUTHEASTERN BANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans, including fees |
$ | 12,827 | $ | 13,517 | $ | 25,455 | $ | 26,860 | ||||||||
Investment securities |
4,510 | 3,955 | 8,830 | 7,374 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
| 3 | | 7 | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
38 | 94 | 85 | 182 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
17,375 | 17,569 | 34,370 | 34,423 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
3,842 | 5,319 | 7,922 | 10,686 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under repurchase
agreements |
1 | 5 | 3 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
663 | 891 | 1,377 | 1,845 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
4,506 | 6,215 | 9,302 | 12,547 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
12,869 | 11,354 | 25,068 | 21,876 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,424 | 3,794 | 6,664 | 7,082 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses |
9,445 | 7,560 | 18,404 | 14,794 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Service charges and fees on deposits |
1,750 | 1,748 | 3,328 | 3,343 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sales of loans |
1,720 | 2,223 | 2,927 | 3,576 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of fixed assets |
| | 17 | 27 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities gains (losses), net |
(30 | ) | 149 | 118 | 162 | |||||||||||
Other-than-temporary loss |
||||||||||||||||
Total impairment loss |
| | (127 | ) | | |||||||||||
Loss recognized in other comprehensive income |
| | 65 | | ||||||||||||
Net impairment loss recognized in
earnings |
| | (62 | ) | | |||||||||||
Retail investment income |
507 | 416 | 964 | 751 | ||||||||||||
Trust service fees |
292 | 290 | 565 | 577 | ||||||||||||
Increase in cash surrender value of
bank-owned life insurance |
248 | 223 | 466 | 452 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous income |
191 | 156 | 404 | 317 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
4,678 | 5,205 | 8,727 | 9,205 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and other personnel expense |
5,654 | 5,915 | 11,218 | 11,409 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy expenses |
1,112 | 1,166 | 2,227 | 2,337 | ||||||||||||
Other real estate losses, net |
366 | 414 | 461 | 328 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
2,931 | 3,067 | 5,932 | 5,920 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
10,063 | 10,562 | 19,838 | 19,994 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
4,060 | 2,203 | 7,293 | 4,005 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
1,255 | 583 | 2,186 | 1,130 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,805 | $ | 1,620 | $ | 5,107 | $ | 2,875 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 8,336 | $ | 4,141 | $ | 9,686 | $ | 7,931 | ||||||||
4
Table of Contents
SOUTHEASTERN BANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Basic net income per share |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per share |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
6,676,467 | 6,673,925 | 6,676,161 | 6,673,631 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding |
6,676,467 | 6,673,968 | 6,676,161 | 6,673,631 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
SOUTHEASTERN BANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 5,107 | $ | 2,875 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities |
||||||||
Depreciation |
1,254 | 1,365 | ||||||
Deferred income tax benefit |
(1,238 | ) | (804 | ) | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
6,664 | 7,082 | ||||||
Net investment securities gains |
(118 | ) | (162 | ) | ||||
Other-than-temporary impairment losses |
62 | | ||||||
Net amortization of premium on investment securities |
1,609 | 584 | ||||||
Increase in CSV of bank-owned life insurance |
(466 | ) | (452 | ) | ||||
Stock options compensation cost |
63 | 120 | ||||||
Gain on disposal of premises and equipment |
(17 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||
Loss (gain) on the sale of other real estate |
213 | (369 | ) | |||||
Provision for other real estate valuation allowance |
248 | 697 | ||||||
Gain on sales of loans |
(2,927 | ) | (3,576 | ) | ||||
Real estate loans originated for sale |
(102,402 | ) | (144,349 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of real estate loans |
102,191 | 133,939 | ||||||
Decrease in accrued interest receivable |
92 | 460 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
(387 | ) | 5,536 | |||||
Decrease in accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
(110 | ) | (1,722 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
9,838 | 1,197 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of securities |
59,984 | 20,364 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and calls of available-for-sale securities |
77,875 | 65,453 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity securities |
| 180 | ||||||
Purchase of available-for-sale securities |
(114,700 | ) | (226,892 | ) | ||||
Purchase of restricted equity securities |
(38 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from redemption of FHLB stock |
291 | | ||||||
Net (increase) decrease in loans |
(7,970 | ) | 26,184 | |||||
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance |
(5,500 | ) | | |||||
Additions to premises and equipment |
(403 | ) | (189 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of other real estate |
2,085 | 5,985 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
36 | 30 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
11,660 | (108,885 | ) | |||||
6
Table of Contents
SOUTHEASTERN BANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in deposits |
(8,737 | ) | 90,908 | |||||
Net decrease in securities sold under
repurchase agreements |
(207 | ) | (2,740 | ) | ||||
Payments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
(8,000 | ) | (5,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from other borrowed funds |
| 300 | ||||||
Proceeds from Directors stock purchase plan |
15 | 12 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(16,929 | ) | 83,480 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,569 | $ | (24,208 | ) | |||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
65,115 | 147,994 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 69,684 | $ | 123,786 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 9,918 | $ | 12,660 | ||||
Income taxes |
$ | 3,054 | $ | 1,846 | ||||
Supplemental information on noncash investing activities: |
||||||||
Loans transferred to other real estate |
$ | 3,353 | $ | 5,544 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
SOUTHEASTERN BANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2011
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Southeastern Bank
Financial Corporation (the Company), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Georgia Bank & Trust
Company of Augusta (GB&T) and Southern Bank & Trust (SB&T). Significant intercompany
transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation. Dollar amounts are rounded to thousands
except share and per share data.
The financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are unaudited
and have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and footnotes included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position
and the results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods have been made. All such
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations which the
Company may achieve for the entire year.
Some items in the prior period financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current
presentation.
(b) Interest Rate Swap Derivatives
At the inception of a derivative contract, the Company designates the derivative, based on the
Companys intentions and belief as to likely effectiveness as a hedge. A hedge of a forecasted
transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset
or liability is referred to as a cash flow hedge. For a cash flow hedge, the gain or loss on the
derivative is reported in other comprehensive income and is reclassified into earnings in the same
periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The changes in the fair value of the
hedge that are not highly effective in
hedging the changes in fair value or expected cash flows of the hedged item are recognized
immediately in current earnings.
8
Table of Contents
Net cash settlements are recorded in interest income or interest expense, based on the item being
hedged. Cash flows on hedges are classified in the cash flow statement the same as the cash flows
of the items being hedged.
The Company formally documents the relationship between derivatives and hedged items, as well as
the risk-management objective and the strategy for undertaking hedge transactions at the inception
of the hedging relationship. This documentation includes linking cash flow hedges to specific
assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted
transactions. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedges inception and on an ongoing
basis, whether the derivative instruments that are used are highly effective in offsetting changes
in the cash flows of the hedged items. To the extent that the cumulative change in anticipated cash
flows from the hedging derivative offsets from 80% to 125% of the cumulative change in anticipated
interest cash flows from the hedged exposure, the hedge will be deemed effective. The Company
discontinues hedge accounting when it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in
offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative is settled or terminates, a
hedged forecasted transaction is no longer probable, a hedged firm commitment is no longer firm, or
treatment of the derivative as a hedge is no longer appropriate or intended.
When hedge accounting is discontinued, subsequent changes in fair value of the derivative are
recorded as noninterest income. When a cash flow hedge is discontinued but the hedged cash flows
or forecasted transactions are still expected to occur, gains or losses that were accumulated in
other comprehensive income are amortized into earnings over the same periods which the hedged
transactions will affect earnings.
(c) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB amended previous guidance related to fair value measurements and
disclosures, which requires new disclosures for transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and requires
a reconciliation to be provided for the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. A reporting
entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2
and provide an explanation for the transfers. This guidance is effective for interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, and did not have a material effect on the Companys results of
operations or financial position.
In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using unobservable inputs (Level 3) a reporting
entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on
a gross basis rather than a net basis. Disclosures relating to purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurement became
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within
those fiscal years. The adoption of this standard did not
have a material effect on the Companys results of operations or financial position but did require
expansion of the Companys disclosures about fair value measurements.
9
Table of Contents
In July 2010, the FASB amended existing guidance related to financing receivables and the allowance
for credit losses, which requires further disaggregated disclosures that improve financial
statement users understanding of 1) the nature of an entitys credit risk associated with its
financing receivables and 2) the entitys assessment of that risk in estimating its allowance for
credit losses as well as changes in the allowance and the reasons for those changes. The new and
amended disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual
reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs
during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the
Companys result of operations or financial position but did require expansion of the Companys
disclosures.
In April 2011, the FASB amended existing guidance to assist creditors in determining whether a
modification of the terms of a receivable meets the definition of a troubled debt restructuring
(TDR). The guidance does not change previous standards that a restructuring of debt constitutes
a TDR if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtors financial difficulties
grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider, but provides clarification
on determining whether a debtor is in financial difficulty and if a concession was granted. The
guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and
should be applied retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the
fiscal year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not
expected to have a material effect on the Companys results of operations or financial position.
In June 2011, the FASB amended existing guidance relating to presentation of other comprehensive
income in a convergence effort with international accounting standards. This guidance eliminates
the option to present the components of comprehensive income as a part of the statement of changes
in stockholders equity and requires a consecutive presentation of net income and other
comprehensive income, and a reconciliation of the components of other comprehensive income.
Similar to the requirements of existing guidance, entities are required to present on the face of
the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from OCI to
net income in the statements where the components of net income and OCI are presented. The
amendments in this guidance should be applied retrospectively and are effective for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is
permitted and the amendments do not require any transition disclosures. The adoption of this
guidance will not have an effect on the Companys results of operations or financial position but
will require expansion of the Companys financial statement presentation.
10
Table of Contents
Note 2 Investment Securities
The following tables summarize the amortized cost and fair value of the available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and the
corresponding amounts of unrealized gains and losses therein.
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | unrealized | unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
cost | gains | losses | fair value | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S.
Government agencies |
$ | 187,340 | 784 | (389 | ) | 187,735 | ||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
82,827 | 1,366 | (952 | ) | 83,241 | |||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. GSEs* MBS -
residential |
146,606 | 2,421 | (482 | ) | 148,545 | |||||||||||
U.S. GSEs CMO |
109,705 | 2,170 | (55 | ) | 111,820 | |||||||||||
Other CMO |
2,607 | | (229 | ) | 2,378 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
36,470 | 176 | (865 | ) | 35,781 | |||||||||||
$ | 565,555 | 6,917 | (2,972 | ) | 569,500 | |||||||||||
* | Government sponsored entities |
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | unrealized | unrealized | Estimated | |||||||||||||
cost | gains | losses | fair value | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S.
Government agencies |
$ | 202,153 | 527 | (1,763 | ) | 200,917 | ||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
67,137 | 318 | (3,337 | ) | 64,118 | |||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. GSEs MBS -
residential |
141,524 | 1,880 | (1,679 | ) | 141,725 | |||||||||||
U.S. GSEs CMO |
139,208 | 1,756 | (630 | ) | 140,334 | |||||||||||
Other CMO |
3,382 | 50 | (359 | ) | 3,073 | |||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
36,551 | 467 | (885 | ) | 36,133 | |||||||||||
Equity securities |
2 | | | 2 | ||||||||||||
$ | 589,957 | 4,998 | (8,653 | ) | 586,302 | |||||||||||
Held-to-maturity |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
$ | 310 | 1 | | 311 | |||||||||||
$ | 310 | 1 | | 311 | ||||||||||||
11
Table of Contents
Proceeds from sales of securities and the associated gains (losses) for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds |
$ | 25,508 | $ | 20,364 | $ | 59,984 | $ | 20,364 | ||||||||
Gross Gains |
132 | 356 | 439 | 356 | ||||||||||||
Gross Losses |
(187 | ) | (214 | ) | (358 | ) | (214 | ) |
The amortized cost and fair value of the investment securities portfolio excluding equity
securities are shown by expected maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual
maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties.
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||
Amortized | Estimated | |||||||
cost | fair value | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Available-for-sale: |
||||||||
One year or less |
$ | 1,669 | 1,700 | |||||
After one year through five years |
25,811 | 25,934 | ||||||
After five years through ten years |
80,622 | 81,614 | ||||||
After ten years |
457,453 | 460,252 | ||||||
$ | 565,555 | 569,500 | ||||||
The following tables summarize the investment securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.
12
Table of Contents
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | Unrealized | Estimated | Unrealized | Estimated | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
fair value | loss | fair value | loss | fair value | loss | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Temporarily impaired |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S.
Government agencies |
$ | 48,756 | 389 | | | 48,756 | 389 | |||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
33,637 | 952 | | | 33,637 | 952 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. GSEs MBS residential |
43,984 | 384 | 465 | 98 | 44,449 | 482 | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. GSEs CMO |
3,215 | 28 | 2,742 | 27 | 5,957 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other CMO |
339 | 3 | 1,546 | 160 | 1,885 | 163 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
11,242 | 125 | 6,966 | 740 | 18,208 | 865 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 141,173 | 1,881 | 11,719 | 1,025 | 152,892 | 2,906 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other-than-temporarily impaired |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other CMO |
$ | | | 493 | 66 | 493 | 66 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 141,173 | 1,881 | 12,212 | 1,091 | 153,385 | 2,972 | ||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated | Unrealized | Estimated | Unrealized | Estimated | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
fair value | loss | fair value | loss | fair value | loss | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Temporarily impaired |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S.
Government agencies |
$ | 99,306 | 1,763 | | | 99,306 | 1,763 | |||||||||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
45,906 | 3,245 | 2,309 | 92 | 48,215 | 3,337 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage backed securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. GSEs MBS residential |
81,783 | 1,538 | 509 | 141 | 82,292 | 1,679 | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. GSEs CMO |
46,776 | 630 | | | 46,776 | 630 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other CMO |
| | 2,085 | 359 | 2,085 | 359 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
22,385 | 481 | 3,880 | 404 | 26,265 | 885 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 296,156 | 7,657 | 8,783 | 996 | 304,939 | 8,653 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment June 30, 2011
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
Investment securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity are generally evaluated
for OTTI under the provisions of ASC 320-10, Investments Debt and Equity Securities. In
determining OTTI, management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the
extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions,
and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be
required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an
other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is
based on the information available to management at a point in time.
13
Table of Contents
When OTTI occurs, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity
intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If an entity intends to sell or it is more likely
than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, the
OTTI shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investments
amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to
sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the
security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, the OTTI shall be separated into the amount
representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total
OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to
be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to other factors
is recognized in other comprehensive income or loss, net of applicable taxes. The previous
amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of
the investment.
As of June 30, 2011, the Companys security portfolio consisted of 339 securities, 89 of which were
in an unrealized loss position. Of these securities with unrealized losses, 54.88% were related to
the Companys mortgage-backed and corporate securities as discussed below.
Mortgage-backed Securities
At June 30, 2011, $260,365 or approximately 99.09% of the Companys mortgage-backed securities were
issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily the Federal National Mortgage
Association (Fannie Mae), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) and the
Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), institutions which the government has
affirmed its commitment to support. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes
in interest rates and illiquidity, and not credit quality, and because the Company does not have
the intent to sell these mortgage-backed securities and it is likely that it will not be required
to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the Company does not consider these
securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2011.
The Companys mortgage-backed securities portfolio also includes five non-agency collateralized
mortgage obligations with a market value of $2,378 which had unrealized losses of approximately
$229 at June 30, 2011. These non-agency securities were rated AAA at purchase.
At June 30, 2011, four of these non-agency securities were rated below investment grade and a cash
flow analysis was performed to evaluate OTTI. The assumptions used in the model include expected
future default rates, loss severity and prepayments. The model also takes into account the
structure of the security including credit support. Based on these assumptions the model
calculates and projects the timing and amount of interest and principal payments expected for the
security. In addition the model was used to stress
14
Table of Contents
each security, or make assumptions more
severe than expected activity, to
determine the degree to which assumptions could deteriorate before the security could no longer
fully support repayment. Upon completion of the June 30, 2011 analysis, our model indicated that
none of these securities were other-than-temporarily impaired. During the first quarter of 2011,
one of these securities was considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired with an OTTI loss of
$127, of which $62 was recognized in earnings. This security remains classified as
available-for-sale at June 30, 2011.
At June 30, 2011, the fair values of three collateralized mortgage obligations totaling $1,950 were
measured using Level 3 inputs because the market for them has become illiquid, as indicated by few,
if any, trades during the period. The discount rates used in the valuation model were based on a
yield of 10% that the market would require for collateralized mortgage obligations with maturities
and risk characteristics similar to the securities being measured.
Corporate Securities
The Company holds nineteen corporate securities totaling $35,781, of which twelve had an unrealized
loss of $865. The Companys unrealized losses on corporate securities relate primarily to its
investment in single issuer corporate and corporate trust preferred securities. At June 30, 2011,
two of the corporate securities were rated below investment grade and seven securities to three
issuers were not rated. None of the issuers were in default but in January of 2011 the Company was
notified that two trust preferred securities totaling $1,250 to two issuers not rated had elected
to defer interest payments. The issuers are both bank holding companies with operations in the
Southeast. One of the issuers of $1,000 of such securities announced a successful capital raise
which was completed in the first quarter of 2011. The Company considered several factors including
the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuers and concluded that the decline in
fair value was primarily attributable to temporary illiquidity and the financial crisis affecting
these markets and not necessarily the expected cash flows of the individual securities. Although
these issuers have indicated they will defer payments going forward, the Company has considered the
capital position of the subsidiary banks, the liquidity of the holding company, the existence and
severity of publicly available regulatory agreements, and the fact that these deferrals are coming
after the most severe impact of the national and regional recession. The prospect of capital
formation in the current market, improving operating results of the industry overall have caused
the Company to conclude that a return to normal subsidiary dividends and thus interest payments on
the debt for these issuers is reasonably assured at this time. Because the Company does not have
the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the
securities before their anticipated recovery, the Company does not consider these securities to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2011.
At June 30, 2011, the fair values of four corporate securities totaling $2,335 were measured using
Level 3 inputs because the market for them has become illiquid, as indicated by few, if any, trades
during the period. The discount rates used in the valuation model were based on current spreads to
U.S. Treasury rates of long-term corporate debt obligations with maturities and risk
characteristics similar to the
subordinated debentures being measured. An additional adjustment to the discount rate for
illiquidity in the market for subordinated debentures was not considered necessary based on the
illiquidity premium already present in the spreads used to estimate the discount rate.
15
Table of Contents
The table below presents a roll forward of the credit losses recognized in earnings for the six
month period ended June 30, 2011.
Beginning balance, January 1, 2011 |
$ | 571 | ||
Amounts related to credit loss for which
an other-than-temporary impairment
was not previously recognized |
| |||
Additions/Subtractions |
||||
Amounts realized for securities sold during the period |
| |||
Amounts related to securities for which the company
intends to sell or that it will be more likely than not
that the company will be required to sell prior to
recovery of amortized cost basis |
| |||
Reductions for increase in cash flows expected to be
collected that are recognized over the remaining
life of the security |
| |||
Increases to the amount related to the credit
loss for which other-than-temporary impairment was
previously recognized |
62 | |||
Ending balance, June 30, 2011 |
$ | 633 | ||
Total other-than-temporary impairment recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss was $65 as
of June 30, 2011.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment June 30, 2010
As of June 30, 2010, the Companys security portfolio consisted of 299 securities, 56 of which were
in an unrealized loss position. The majority or 66.64% of unrealized losses were related to the
Companys mortgage-backed and corporate securities. Four of the mortgage-backed securities were
rated below investment grade and a cash flow analysis was performed to evaluate OTTI. The
assumptions used in the model include expected future default rates, loss severity and prepayments.
The model also takes into account the structure of the security including credit support. Based
on these assumptions, the model calculates and projects the timing and amount of interest and
principal payments expected for the security. In addition, the model was used to stress each
security, or make assumptions more severe than expected activity, to determine the degree to which
assumptions could deteriorate before the security could no longer fully support repayment. Upon
completion of the June 30, 2010 analysis, our model indicated that none of the securities were
other-than-temporarily impaired.
16
Table of Contents
Note 3 Loans
The following table summarizes loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
$ | 185,106 | 189,128 | |||||
Real estate: |
||||||||
Commercial |
335,841 | 327,458 | ||||||
Residential |
162,184 | 157,680 | ||||||
Acquisition, development
and construction |
175,771 | 182,412 | ||||||
Consumer installment |
14,975 | 17,412 | ||||||
$ | 873,877 | 874,090 | ||||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
28,410 | 26,657 | ||||||
Less deferred loan origination fees (costs) |
76 | (5 | ) | |||||
$ | 845,391 | 847,438 | ||||||
17
Table of Contents
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded
investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of June 30, 2011.
Commercial, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial, and | CRE - Owner | CRE - Non Owner | Residential | ADC | ADC | ADC | ADC | ADC | ADC | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural | Occupied | Occupied | Real Estate | CSRA | Savannah | Greenville | Athens | Participations - FL | Participations - GA | Consumer | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 3,463 | 3,921 | 4,777 | 5,372 | 5,097 | 453 | 284 | 796 | 888 | 975 | 631 | 26,657 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
1,304 | 115 | 512 | 764 | 760 | 300 | | 596 | 888 | | 73 | 5,312 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries |
304 | | | 8 | | | 6 | | | | 83 | 401 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision |
1,581 | 2,026 | 235 | 683 | 1,290 | 165 | (111 | ) | 465 | | 374 | (44 | ) | 6,664 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 4,044 | 5,832 | 4,500 | 5,299 | 5,627 | 318 | 179 | 665 | | 1,349 | 597 | 28,410 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance attributable to loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
117 | 370 | | 100 | | | 105 | | | | | 692 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
3,927 | 5,462 | 4,500 | 5,199 | 5,627 | 318 | 74 | 665 | | 1,349 | 597 | 27,718 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 4,044 | 5,832 | 4,500 | 5,299 | 5,627 | 318 | 179 | 665 | | 1,349 | 597 | 28,410 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
1,636 | 4,469 | 3,704 | 6,457 | 3,137 | 1,534 | 885 | 2,909 | 521 | | 105 | 25,357 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
183,394 | 182,982 | 144,686 | 155,727 | 143,374 | 10,377 | 670 | 5,864 | | 6,500 | 14,870 | 848,444 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 185,030 | 187,451 | 148,390 | 162,184 | 146,511 | 11,911 | 1,555 | 8,773 | 521 | 6,500 | 14,975 | 873,801 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18
Table of Contents
The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for | Average | Cash Basis | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid Principal | Recorded | Loan Losses | Recorded | Interest Income | Interest Income | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Investment | Allocated | Investment | Recognized | Recognized | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
With no related allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commerical |
$ | | | | | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
Financial |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
931 | 931 | | 1,250 | 31 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity lines |
724 | 724 | | 724 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Non Owner occupied |
244 | 244 | | 246 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured by first liens |
1,378 | 1,378 | | 1,379 | 14 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Secured by junior liens |
46 | 46 | | 46 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
73 | 73 | | 73 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
1,669 | 1,669 | | 1,670 | 20 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
19 | 19 | | 8 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
5,084 | 5,084 | | 5,396 | 69 | 69 | |||||||||||||||||||
With an allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commerical |
215 | 215 | 117 | 219 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity lines |
638 | 638 | | 334 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
4,469 | 4,469 | 370 | 4,460 | 34 | 34 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non Owner occupied |
3,460 | 3,466 | | 3,583 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured by first liens |
3,748 | 3,754 | 100 | 4,979 | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Secured by junior liens |
106 | 106 | | 135 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
307 | 307 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
7,244 | 7,244 | 105 | 7,782 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
86 | 86 | | 87 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
20,273 | 20,285 | 692 | 21,579 | 53 | 53 | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 25,357 | 25,369 | 692 | 26,975 | 122 | 122 | ||||||||||||||||||
19
Table of Contents
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for | ||||||||||||
Unpaid Principal | Recorded | Loan Losses | ||||||||||
Balance | Investment | Allocated | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
With no related allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural: |
||||||||||||
Commerical |
$ | 8 | 8 | | ||||||||
Financial |
| | | |||||||||
Agricultural |
1,016 | 1,016 | | |||||||||
Equity lines |
720 | 720 | | |||||||||
Other |
| | | |||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
390 | 390 | | |||||||||
Non Owner occupied |
180 | 180 | | |||||||||
Residential real estate: |
||||||||||||
Secured by first liens |
1,742 | 1,742 | | |||||||||
Secured by junior liens |
| | | |||||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction: |
||||||||||||
Residential |
636 | 636 | | |||||||||
Other |
5,987 | 5,987 | | |||||||||
Consumer |
| | | |||||||||
10,679 | 10,679 | | ||||||||||
With an allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural: |
||||||||||||
Commerical |
| | | |||||||||
Financial |
| | | |||||||||
Agricultural |
| | | |||||||||
Equity lines |
| | | |||||||||
Other |
| | | |||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
129 | 129 | 3 | |||||||||
Non Owner occupied |
3,227 | 3,230 | 210 | |||||||||
Residential real estate: |
||||||||||||
Secured by first liens |
3,229 | 3,234 | 42 | |||||||||
Secured by junior liens |
| | | |||||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction: |
||||||||||||
Residential |
156 | 156 | | |||||||||
Other |
7,628 | 7,638 | 1,219 | |||||||||
Consumer |
| | | |||||||||
14,369 | 14,387 | 1,474 | ||||||||||
$ | 25,048 | 25,066 | 1,474 | |||||||||
20
Table of Contents
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance
homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified
impaired loans.
The following tables present the recorded investment in nonaccrual and loans past due over 90 days
still on accrual by class of loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||
Loans Past Due | ||||||||
90 Days or More | ||||||||
Nonaccrual | Still Accruing | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural: |
||||||||
Commerical |
$ | 449 | | |||||
Financial |
| | ||||||
Agricultural |
961 | | ||||||
Equity lines |
1,562 | | ||||||
Other |
| | ||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||
Owner occupied |
4,963 | | ||||||
Non Owner occupied |
2,553 | | ||||||
Residential real estate: |
||||||||
Secured by first liens |
5,046 | | ||||||
Secured by junior liens |
186 | | ||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction: |
||||||||
Residential |
187 | | ||||||
Other |
9,071 | | ||||||
Consumer |
254 | | ||||||
$ | 25,232 | | ||||||
21
Table of Contents
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||
Loans Past Due | ||||||||
90 Days or More | ||||||||
Nonaccrual | Still Accruing | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural: |
||||||||
Commerical |
$ | 190 | | |||||
Financial |
| | ||||||
Agricultural |
1,250 | | ||||||
Equity lines |
1,136 | | ||||||
Other |
348 | | ||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||
Owner occupied |
1,207 | | ||||||
Non Owner occupied |
2,586 | | ||||||
Residential real estate: |
||||||||
Secured by first liens |
4,551 | 69 | ||||||
Secured by junior liens |
183 | | ||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction: |
||||||||
Residential |
1,275 | | ||||||
Other |
10,678 | | ||||||
Consumer |
301 | | ||||||
$ | 23,705 | 69 | ||||||
The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010 by class of loans.
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 - 89 Days | 90 Days or | Nonaccrual | Total | Loans Not | ||||||||||||||||||||
Past Due | More Past Due | Loans | Past Due | Past Due | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commerical |
$ | 75 | | 449 | 524 | 121,149 | 121,673 | |||||||||||||||||
Financial |
| | | | 3,411 | 3,411 | ||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
888 | | 961 | 1,849 | 12,955 | 14,804 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity lines |
181 | | 1,562 | 1,743 | 38,262 | 40,005 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | 5,213 | 5,213 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
289 | | 4,963 | 5,252 | 182,199 | 187,451 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non Owner occupied |
212 | | 2,553 | 2,765 | 145,625 | 148,390 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured by first liens |
2,595 | | 5,046 | 7,641 | 144,472 | 152,113 | ||||||||||||||||||
Secured by junior liens |
154 | | 186 | 340 | 9,731 | 10,071 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
| | 187 | 187 | 42,001 | 42,188 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
10 | | 9,071 | 9,081 | 124,502 | 133,583 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
52 | | 254 | 306 | 14,669 | 14,975 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 4,456 | | 25,232 | 29,688 | 844,189 | 873,877 | ||||||||||||||||||
22
Table of Contents
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 - 89 Days | 90 Days or | Nonaccrual | Total | Loans Not | ||||||||||||||||||||
Past Due | More Past Due | Loans | Past Due | Past Due | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commerical |
$ | 170 | | 190 | 360 | 117,786 | 118,146 | |||||||||||||||||
Financial |
| | | | 3,588 | 3,588 | ||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural |
| | 1,250 | 1,250 | 12,940 | 14,190 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity lines |
214 | | 1,136 | 1,350 | 41,687 | 43,037 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | 348 | 348 | 9,819 | 10,167 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
317 | | 1,207 | 1,524 | 182,939 | 184,463 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non Owner occupied |
521 | | 2,586 | 3,107 | 139,888 | 142,995 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured by first liens |
2,417 | 69 | 4,551 | 7,037 | 140,238 | 147,275 | ||||||||||||||||||
Secured by junior liens |
155 | | 183 | 338 | 10,067 | 10,405 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
| | 1,275 | 1,275 | 41,538 | 42,813 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
121 | | 10,678 | 10,799 | 128,800 | 139,599 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
31 | | 301 | 332 | 17,080 | 17,412 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 3,946 | 69 | 23,705 | 27,720 | 846,370 | 874,090 | ||||||||||||||||||
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
The Company has troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) with a balance of $4,733 and $3,514 included in
impaired loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company has recorded $321
and $446 in charge-offs on these TDRs during the period ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. Specific reserves of $0 and $80 have been allocated to customers whose loan terms
have been modified in TDRs as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The Company is not committed
to lend additional amounts as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 to customers with outstanding
loans that are classified as TDRs. The following table presents TDRs as of June 30, 2011.
23
Table of Contents
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Pre-Modification | Post-Modification | |||||||||||
Number of | Outstanding | Outstanding | ||||||||||
Contracts | Recorded Investment | Recorded Investment | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Troubled Debt Restructurings: |
||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural: |
||||||||||||
Commerical |
| $ | | $ | | |||||||
Financial |
| | | |||||||||
Agricultural |
| | | |||||||||
Equity lines |
| | | |||||||||
Other |
| | | |||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
3 | 519 | 519 | |||||||||
Non Owner occupied |
5 | 2,053 | 2,035 | |||||||||
Residential real estate: |
||||||||||||
Secured by first liens |
8 | 2,022 | 2,005 | |||||||||
Secured by junior liens |
2 | 120 | 113 | |||||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction: |
||||||||||||
Residential |
| | | |||||||||
Other |
| | | |||||||||
Consumer |
1 | 19 | 17 |
Credit Quality Indicators:
The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability
of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment
experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other
factors. The Company, through its originating account officer, places an initial credit risk
rating on every loan. An annual review and analysis of loan relationships (irrespective of loan
types included in the overall relationship) with total related exposure of $500 or greater is
performed by the Credit Administration department in order to update risk ratings given current
available information. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings.
Watch: Loans classified as watch have a potential weakness that deserves managements close
attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of
the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institutions credit position at some future
date.
Substandard: Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net
worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so
classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the
debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain
some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
24
Table of Contents
Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified
as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or
liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly
questionable and improbable.
Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described
process are considered to be pass rated loans. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and
based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as
follows.
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Pass | Watch | Substandard | Doubtful | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural: |
||||||||||||||||
Commerical |
$ | 108,404 | 6,320 | 6,949 | | |||||||||||
Financial |
1,013 | 2,398 | | | ||||||||||||
Agricultural |
10,792 | 1,934 | 2,078 | | ||||||||||||
Equity lines |
37,461 | 729 | 1,815 | | ||||||||||||
Other |
4,274 | 329 | 610 | | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
158,765 | 17,304 | 11,382 | | ||||||||||||
Non Owner occupied |
122,468 | 19,305 | 6,617 | | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Secured by first liens |
128,435 | 13,398 | 10,280 | | ||||||||||||
Secured by junior liens |
8,704 | 1,092 | 275 | | ||||||||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction: |
||||||||||||||||
Residential |
40,516 | 1,485 | 187 | | ||||||||||||
Other |
97,880 | 10,715 | 24,988 | | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
14,098 | 423 | 454 | | ||||||||||||
$ | 732,810 | 75,432 | 65,635 | | ||||||||||||
25
Table of Contents
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Pass | Watch | Substandard | Doubtful | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural: |
||||||||||||||||
Commerical |
$ | 103,337 | 8,074 | 6,735 | | |||||||||||
Financial |
1,103 | 2,485 | | | ||||||||||||
Agricultural |
9,343 | 2,609 | 2,238 | | ||||||||||||
Equity lines |
39,144 | 1,915 | 1,978 | | ||||||||||||
Other |
8,893 | 926 | 348 | | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Owner occupied |
157,155 | 22,329 | 4,979 | | ||||||||||||
Non Owner occupied |
119,160 | 16,579 | 7,256 | | ||||||||||||
Residential real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Secured by first liens |
124,261 | 14,837 | 8,177 | | ||||||||||||
Secured by junior liens |
9,418 | 708 | 279 | | ||||||||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction: |
||||||||||||||||
Residential |
38,374 | 2,721 | 1,718 | | ||||||||||||
Other |
92,514 | 23,285 | 23,800 | | ||||||||||||
Consumer |
16,247 | 567 | 598 | | ||||||||||||
$ | 718,949 | 97,035 | 58,106 | | ||||||||||||
Note 4 Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value
hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that
may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1:
|
Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date. | |
Level 2:
|
Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. | |
Level 3:
|
Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a companys own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. |
26
Table of Contents
In determining the appropriate levels, the Company used the following methods and significant
assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument:
Investment Securities: The fair values for investment securities are determined by quoted
market prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair
values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2). For securities where
quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated
using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3). Discounted cash flows are
calculated using spread to swap and LIBOR curves that are updated to incorporate loss severities,
volatility, credit spread and optionality. During times when trading is more liquid, broker quotes
are used (if available) to validate the model. Rating agency and industry research reports as well
as defaults and deferrals on individual securities are reviewed and incorporated into the
calculations.
Interest Rate Swap Derivatives: The fair value of interest rate swap derivatives is
determined based on discounted cash flow valuation models using observable market data as of the
measurement date (Level 2 inputs). The fair value adjustment is included in other liabilities.
Mortgage Banking Derivatives: The fair value of mortgage banking derivatives is determined
by individual third party sales contract prices for the specific loans held at each reporting
period end (Level 2 inputs). The fair value adjustment is included in other assets.
Loans Held for Sale: Loans held for sale are carried at fair value, as determined by
outstanding commitments, from third party investors (Level 2).
Impaired Loans: The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the
allowance for loan losses is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may
utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and
the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to
adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are
typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair
value.
Investments in Tax Credits: The fair values for tax credits are measured on a recurring
basis and are based upon total credits and deductions remaining to be allocated and total estimated
credits and deductions to be allocated (Level 3 inputs).
Other Real Estate Owned: The fair value of other real estate owned is generally based on
recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a
combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are
routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the
comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically significant and result
in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.
27
Table of Contents
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis by level within the hierarchy as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Quoted Prices in | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Significant Other | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | Identical Assets | Observable Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S.
Government agencies |
$ | 187,735 | 47,705 | 140,030 | | |||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
83,241 | | 83,241 | | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. GSEs MBS residential |
148,545 | | 148,080 | 465 | ||||||||||||
U.S. GSEs CMO |
111,820 | | 111,820 | | ||||||||||||
Other CMO |
2,378 | | 428 | 1,950 | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
35,781 | | 33,446 | 2,335 | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities |
$ | 569,500 | 47,705 | 517,045 | 4,750 | |||||||||||
Tax credits |
316 | | | 316 | ||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
15,913 | | 15,913 | | ||||||||||||
Mortgage banking derivatives |
82 | | 82 | | ||||||||||||
$ | 585,811 | 47,705 | 533,040 | 5,066 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap derivatives |
106 | | 106 | | ||||||||||||
$ | 106 | | 106 | | ||||||||||||
28
Table of Contents
Quoted Prices in | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Significant Other | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
December 31, | Identical Assets | Observable Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S.
Government agencies |
$ | 200,917 | 31,405 | 169,512 | | |||||||||||
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
64,118 | | 64,118 | | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. GSEs MBS residential |
141,725 | | 141,216 | 509 | ||||||||||||
U.S. GSEs CMO |
140,334 | 985 | 139,349 | | ||||||||||||
Other CMO |
3,073 | | 663 | 2,410 | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
36,133 | | 25,395 | 10,738 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
2 | 2 | | | ||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale securities |
$ | 586,302 | 32,392 | 540,253 | 13,657 | |||||||||||
Tax credits |
356 | | | 356 | ||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
12,775 | | 12,775 | | ||||||||||||
Mortgage banking derivatives |
2 | | 2 | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 599,435 | 32,392 | 553,030 | 14,013 | |||||||||||
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, six U.S. agency securities with a market value of
$15,564 were transferred out of Level 2 and into Level 1. During the first quarter of 2011, eight
corporate securities with a market value of $7,278 were transferred out of Level 3 and into Level 2
based on observable market data for these securities due to increased market activity for these
securities. The tables below present a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains
and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of June 30, 2011 and 2010.
29
Table of Contents
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs | ||||||||||||
(Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale | ||||||||||||
Tax credits | Securities | Total | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Beginning balance, January 1, 2011 |
$ | 356 | 13,657 | 14,013 | ||||||||
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) |
||||||||||||
Included in earnings |
||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sales |
| | | |||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment |
| (62 | ) | (62 | ) | |||||||
Amortization of tax credit investment |
(40 | ) | | (40 | ) | |||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
| (1,567 | ) | (1,567 | ) | |||||||
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements |
||||||||||||
Purchases |
| | | |||||||||
Sales |
| | | |||||||||
Issuances |
| | | |||||||||
Settlements |
| | | |||||||||
Transfers into Level 3 |
| | | |||||||||
Transfers out of Level 3 |
| (7,278 | ) | (7,278 | ) | |||||||
Ending balance, June 30, 2011 |
$ | 316 | 4,750 | 5,066 | ||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs | ||||||||||||
(Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Available-for-sale | ||||||||||||
Tax credits | Securities | Total | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Beginning balance, January 1, 2010 |
$ | 435 | 14,365 | 14,800 | ||||||||
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) |
||||||||||||
Included in earnings |
||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sales |
| (122 | ) | (122 | ) | |||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment |
| | | |||||||||
Amortization of tax credit investment |
(40 | ) | | (40 | ) | |||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
| 1,856 | 1,856 | |||||||||
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements |
||||||||||||
Purchases |
| | | |||||||||
Sales |
| (1,790 | ) | (1,790 | ) | |||||||
Issuances |
| | | |||||||||
Settlements |
| | | |||||||||
Transfers into Level 3 |
| | | |||||||||
Transfers out of Level 3 |
| | | |||||||||
Ending balance, June 30, 2010 |
$ | 395 | 14,309 | 14,704 | ||||||||
30
Table of Contents
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 are summarized below.
Quoted Prices in | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Significant Other | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | Identical Assets | Observable Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, and
agricultural |
$ | 736 | | | 736 | |||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
7,559 | | | 7,559 | ||||||||||||
Residential |
3,754 | | | 3,754 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction |
7,446 | | | 7,446 | ||||||||||||
Consumer installment |
86 | | | 86 | ||||||||||||
Total impaired loans |
$ | 19,581 | | | 19,581 | |||||||||||
Other real estate owned |
8,558 | | | 8,558 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 28,139 | | | 28,139 | |||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Significant Other | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
December 31, | Identical Assets | Observable Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial, and agricultural |
$ | | | | | |||||||||||
Real estate: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
3,143 | | | 3,143 | ||||||||||||
Residential |
3,187 | | | 3,187 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition, development and
construction |
6,565 | | | 6,565 | ||||||||||||
Consumer installment |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Total impaired loans |
$ | 12,895 | | | 12,895 | |||||||||||
Other real estate owned |
7,751 | | | 7,751 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,646 | | | 20,646 | |||||||||||
The following represents impairment charges recognized during the period:
Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of collateral for collateral
dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $20,273, with a valuation allowance of $692, resulting in
an additional provision for loan losses of $1,267 and $2,877 for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, respectively. Impaired loans that are not carried at fair value had a carrying
amount of $5,084 at June 30, 2011.
31
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2010, impaired loans had a carrying amount of $14,369, with a valuation
allowance of $1,474, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $6,831 for the year
ending 2010. Impaired loans that are not carried at fair value had a carrying amount of $10,679 at
December 31, 2010.
Other real estate owned, which is carried at lower of cost or fair value, was $8,558 which
consisted of the outstanding balance of $10,680, less a valuation allowance of $2,122, resulting in
a write down of $135 and $248 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, other real estate owned was $7,751 which consisted of the outstanding
balance of $9,866, less a valuation allowance of $2,115, resulting in a write down of $1,909 for
the year ending 2010.
Disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the
balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value is required. Fair value
estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and
information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount
that could result from offering for sale at one time the Companys entire holdings of a particular
financial instrument.
Because no market exists for a portion of the Companys financial instruments, fair value estimates
are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk
characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are
subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore,
cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the
estimates.
Fair value estimates are based on existing on and off-balance sheet financial instruments without
attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and
liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications
related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair
value estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates.
The assumptions used in the estimation of the fair value of the Companys financial instruments are
explained below. Where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates
using discounted cash flow and other valuation techniques. Discounted cash flows can be
significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future
cash flows. The following fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to
independent markets and should not be considered representative of the liquidation value of the
Companys financial instruments, but rather a good-faith estimate of the fair value of financial
instruments
held by the Company. Certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are
excluded from disclosure requirements.
32
Table of Contents
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its
financial instruments:
(a) | Cash and Cash Equivalents |
||
Fair value equals the carrying value of such assets due to their nature. |
|||
(b) | Loans, net |
||
The fair value of loans is calculated using discounted cash flows by loan type. The
discount rate used to determine the present value of the loan portfolio is an estimated
market rate that reflects the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan
portfolio without considering widening credit spreads due to market illiquidity. The
estimated maturity is based on the Companys historical experience with repayments
adjusted to estimate the effect of current market conditions. The carrying amount of
related accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value and is not disclosed.
The carrying amount of real estate loans originated for sale approximates their fair
value. The allowance for loan losses is considered a reasonable discount for credit
risk. |
|||
(c) | Deposits |
||
Fair values for certificates of deposit have been determined using discounted cash flows.
The discount rate used is based on estimated market rates for deposits of similar
remaining maturities. The carrying amounts of all other deposits, due to their
short-term nature, approximate their fair values. The carrying amount of related accrued
interest payable approximates its fair value and is not disclosed. |
|||
(d) | Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements |
||
Fair value approximates the carrying value of such liabilities due to their short-term nature. |
|||
(e) | Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
||
The fair value of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances is obtained from the FHLB
and is calculated by discounting contractual cash flows using an estimated interest rate
based on the current rates available to the Company for debt of similar remaining
maturities and collateral terms. |
|||
(f) | Subordinated debentures |
||
The fair value for subordinated debentures is calculated based upon current market
spreads to LIBOR for debt of similar remaining maturities and collateral terms. |
33
Table of Contents
(g) | Commitments |
||
The difference between the carrying values and fair values of commitments to extend
credit are not significant and are not disclosed. |
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments at June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||
Carrying | Estimated | |||||||
amount | fair value | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents |
$ | 69,684 | 69,684 | |||||
Loans, net |
861,304 | 861,182 | ||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||
Deposits with stated maturities |
421,742 | 425,939 | ||||||
Deposits without stated maturities |
980,258 | 980,258 | ||||||
Securities sold under
repurchase agreements |
611 | 611 | ||||||
Advances from FHLB |
52,000 | 56,736 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures |
22,947 | 15,072 |
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||
Carrying | Estimated | |||||||
amount | fair value | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents |
$ | 65,115 | 65,115 | |||||
Loans, net |
860,213 | 858,505 | ||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||
Deposits with stated maturities |
487,810 | 491,867 | ||||||
Deposits without stated maturities |
922,927 | 922,927 | ||||||
Securities sold under
repurchase agreements |
818 | 818 | ||||||
Advances from FHLB |
60,000 | 64,615 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures |
22,947 | 14,978 |
Note 5 Interest Rate Swap Derivatives
The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements as part of its asset liability management
strategy to help manage its interest rate risk position. The notional amount of the interest rate
swaps does not represent amounts exchanged by the parties. The amount exchanged is determined by
reference to the notional amount and the other terms of the individual interest rate swap
agreements.
34
Table of Contents
During May 2011, the Company entered into two interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling
$10 million, which were designated as cash flow hedges of certain subordinated debentures and were
determined to be fully effective during all periods presented. As such, no amount of ineffectiveness has been
included in net income. Therefore, the aggregate fair value of the swaps is recorded in other
liabilities with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income. The Company expects
the hedges to remain highly effective during the remaining terms of the swaps.
Summary information about the interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges as of June 30,
2011 is as follows:
June 30, 2011 | ||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||
Notional Amounts |
$ | 10,000 | ||
Weighted average pay rates |
5.35 | % | ||
Weighted average receive rates |
1.65 | % | ||
Weigted average maturity |
16.75 years | |||
Unrealized losses |
($106 | ) |
The swaps are forward starting and have effective dates of March 15, 2012 and June 15, 2012.
No interest income (expense) has been recorded on these swap transactions during 2011. When
interest income (expense) is recorded it will be reported as a component of interest expense in
other borrowings.
Note 6 Comprehensive Income
Other comprehensive income for the Company consists of changes in net unrealized gains and losses
on investment securities available-for-sale and interest rate swap derivatives. The following
table presents total comprehensive income as of June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,805 | $ | 1,620 | $ | 5,107 | $ | 2,875 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized derivative losses |
(106 | ) | | (106 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net change in unrealized investment gains (losses) |
9,128 | 4,210 | 7,656 | 8,342 | ||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for investment
(gains) losses, net of OTTI included in net
income |
30 | (149 | ) | (56 | ) | (162 | ) | |||||||||
Tax effect |
(3,521 | ) | (1,540 | ) | (2,915 | ) | (3,124 | ) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
5,531 | 2,521 | 4,579 | 5,056 | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 8,336 | $ | 4,141 | $ | 9,686 | $ | 7,931 | ||||||||
35
Table of Contents
Note 7 Dividends
The Company suspended the payment of quarterly cash dividends on the companys common stock
effective April 22, 2009. The Company considered the action prudent in order to maintain its
capital position in the current state of the economy. The Company plans to reinstate the dividend
payment at an appropriate time once economic conditions improve and stabilize.
36
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Dollar amounts are expressed in thousands unless otherwise noted)
Overview
Southeastern Bank Financial Corporation (the Company) operates two wholly-owned subsidiaries in
the Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC metropolitan area Georgia Bank & Trust Company (GB&T) and
Southern Bank & Trust (SB&T), a South Carolina State Bank (collectively, the Banks). GB&T was
organized by a group of local citizens and commenced business on August 28, 1989, with one branch
location. Today, it is Augustas largest community banking company operating nine full service
branches in Augusta, Martinez, and Evans, Georgia. Mortgage origination offices are located in
Augusta and Savannah, Georgia. SB&T was organized by the Company during 2005 and 2006 and opened
its main office on September 12, 2006. Today it operates three full service branches in North
Augusta and Aiken, South Carolina. The Companys Operations Center is located in Martinez, Georgia
and services both subsidiaries.
On July 27, 2011, the Company passed resolutions authorizing and directing management to prepare
and file any necessary regulatory applications for approval of a merger between GB&T and SB&T with
GB&T the surviving entity. The Boards of both banks have also passed resolutions authorizing the
merger. The consolidation is intended to lower the Companys cost structure while allowing GB&T and
the former SB&T to continue with operating autonomy in areas that impact customer relationships.
The Company anticipates the Interagency Bank Merger Act Application will be filed with the
appropriate regulatory agencies no later than August 2011. If approved, management anticipates the
two banks will merge operations in the fourth quarter of 2011.
The Companys primary market includes Richmond and Columbia Counties in Georgia and Aiken County in
South Carolina, all part of the Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC metropolitan statistical area (MSA).
The Augusta market area has a diversified economy based principally on government, public
utilities, health care, manufacturing, construction, and wholesale and retail trade. Augusta is
one of the leading medical centers in the Southeast.
The Companys services include the origination of residential and commercial real estate loans,
construction and development loans, and commercial and consumer loans. The Company also offers a
variety of deposit programs, including noninterest-bearing demand, interest checking, money
management, savings, and time deposits. In the primary market area, Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC
metropolitan area, the Company had 18.62% of all deposits and was the second largest depository
institution at June 30, 2010, as cited from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations website.
Securities sold under repurchase agreements are also offered. Additional services include wealth
management, trust, retail investment, and mortgage. As a matter of practice, most mortgage loans
are sold in
37
Table of Contents
the secondary market; however, some mortgage loans are
placed in the portfolio based on
asset/liability management strategies. The Company continues to concentrate on increasing its
market share through various new deposit and loan products and other financial services and by
focusing on customer relationship management philosophy. The Company is committed to building
life-long relationships with its customers, employees, shareholders, and the communities it serves.
The Companys primary source of income is from its lending activities followed by interest income
from its investment activities, service charges and fees on deposits, and gain on sales of mortgage
loans in the secondary market. Interest income on loans decreased during the first six months of
2011 as compared to the first six months of 2010 and is due primarily to decreased loan volume.
Interest income on investment securities increased primarily due to a significantly larger investment portfolio but the increase was limited
by declining yields on the portfolio. The average portfolio yield has decreased in part due to
declining market interest rates which caused higher yielding securities to be called. Decreases in
non-sufficient funds (NSF) income on retail checking accounts, due primarily to decreased
economic activity, were mostly offset by increases in ATM/Debit card income for the first six
months of 2011. For the six month period gain on sales of loans decreased and resulted primarily
from decreased mortgage refinancing activity during the first six months of the year. Investment
securities gains decreased on a net basis during the first six months of 2011 as compared to the
same period last year due in part to selected sales of higher duration securities to reduce
exposure to rising interest rates and a settlement of $149 with an institution regarding premium
amortization on certain bonds purchased in 2010.
Table 1 Selected Financial Data
June 30, | December 31, | June 30, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Assets |
$ | 1,599,921 | $ | 1,607,105 | $ | 1,580,928 | ||||||
Investment securities |
569,500 | 586,612 | 455,360 | |||||||||
Loans |
873,801 | 874,095 | 900,167 | |||||||||
Deposits |
1,402,000 | 1,410,737 | 1,371,442 | |||||||||
Annualized return on average total assets |
0.64 | % | 0.44 | % | 0.38 | % | ||||||
Annualized return on average equity |
10.09 | % | 6.81 | % | 5.94 | % |
The Company continues to focus on the net interest margin, regulatory capital levels,
liquidity management, asset quality and risk mitigation. Asset levels have remained relatively
flat due to the Companys focus on improving regulatory capital levels and have been driven by an
$8,737 decrease in deposits during the first half of 2011, most of which occurred in the second
quarter. In addition, loan balances have trended lower as demand has remained weak. Investment
portfolio balances have increased over the comparable periods in order to obtain an improvement in
net interest income.
38
Table of Contents
Annualized return on average total assets and annualized return on average equity have improved in
2011 as compared to 2010. The increased returns were due primarily to increased net interest
income and somewhat decreased loan loss provisions in 2011. Net income for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 was $5,107 compared to $2,875 for the same period in 2010. The effects of the
economic downturn continue to negatively affect financial results primarily through a lack of loan
demand and a continued elevated level of provision for loan losses.
The Company meets its liquidity needs by managing cash and due from banks, federal funds purchased
and sold, maturity of investment securities, principal repayments from mortgage-backed securities,
and draws on lines of credit. Additionally, liquidity can be managed through structuring deposit
and loan maturities. The Company funds loan and investment growth with core deposits, securities
sold under repurchase agreements, Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other wholesale funding
including brokered certificates of deposit. During inflationary periods, interest rates generally
increase and operating expenses generally rise. When interest rates rise, variable rate loans and
investments produce higher earnings; however, deposit and other borrowings interest expense also
rise. The Company monitors its interest rate risk as it applies to net interest income in a ramp
up and down annually 400 basis points (4.00%) scenario and as it applies to economic value
of equity in a shock up and down 400 basis points (4.00%) scenario. The Company monitors operating
expenses through responsibility center budgeting.
Forward-Looking Statements
Southeastern Bank Financial Corporation may, from time to time, make written or oral
forward-looking statements, including statements contained in the Companys filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) and its reports to shareholders. Statements
made in such documents, other than those concerning historical information, should be considered
forward-looking and subject to various risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements
are made based upon managements belief as well as assumptions made by, and information currently
available to, management pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. The Companys actual results may differ materially from the results
anticipated in forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including unanticipated
changes in the Companys local economies, the national economy, governmental monetary and fiscal
policies, deposit levels, loan demand, loan collateral values and securities portfolio values;
difficulties in interest rate risk management; the effects of competition in the banking business;
difficulties in expanding the Companys business into new markets; changes in governmental
regulation relating to the banking industry, including but not limited to the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of
reserves for loan losses, including the value of collateral underlying delinquent loans; and other
factors. The Company cautions that such factors are not exclusive. The Company does not undertake
to update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by, or on behalf of, the
Company.
39
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Estimates
The accounting and financial reporting policies of the Company and its subsidiaries conform to
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and to general practices
within the banking industry. Of these policies, management has identified the allowance for loan
losses, determining the fair values of financial instruments including other real estate owned,
investment securities, and other-than-temporary impairment as critical accounting estimates that
requires difficult, subjective judgment and are important to the presentation of the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to
expense, which affects the Companys earnings directly. Loans are charged against the allowance
for loan losses when management believes that the collectability of the principal is unlikely.
Subsequent recoveries are added to the allowance. The allowance is an amount that reflects
managements estimate of the level of probable incurred losses in the portfolio. Factors
considered by management in determining the adequacy of the allowance include, but are not limited
to: (1) detailed reviews of individual loans; (2) historical and current trends in loan charge-offs
for the various portfolio segments evaluated; (3) the level of the allowance in relation to total
loans and to historical loss levels; (4) levels and trends in non-performing and past due loans;
(5) collateral values of properties securing loans; and (6) managements assessment of economic
conditions. The Companys Board of Directors reviews the recommendations of management regarding
the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses based upon these factors.
The provision for loan losses is the charge to operating earnings necessary to maintain an adequate
allowance for loan losses. The Company has developed policies and procedures for evaluating the
overall quality of its loan portfolio and the timely identification of problem credits. Management
continues to review these policies and procedures and makes further improvements as needed. The
adequacy of the Companys allowance for loan losses and the effectiveness of the Companys internal policies and procedures are also
reviewed periodically by the Companys regulators and the Companys internal loan review personnel.
The Companys regulators may advise the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based upon
their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Such
regulatory guidance is considered, and the Company may recognize additions to the allowance as a
result.
The Company continues to refine the methodology on which the level of the allowance for loan losses
is based, by comparing historical loss ratios utilized to actual experience and by classifying
loans for analysis based on similar risk characteristics. Cash receipts for accruing loans are
applied to principal and interest under the contractual terms of the loan agreement; however, cash
receipts on impaired and nonaccrual loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued
are applied to principal and interest income depending upon the overall risk of principal loss to
the Company.
40
Table of Contents
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
A significant portion of the Companys assets are financial instruments carried at fair value. This
includes securities available-for-sale, loans held for sale, certain impaired loans, tax credits,
derivatives and other real estate owned. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the percentage of
total assets measured at fair value was 38.38% and 38.58%, respectively. The majority of assets
carried at fair value are based on either quoted market prices or market prices for similar
instruments. At June 30, 2011 5.41% of assets measured at fair value were based on significant
unobservable inputs. This represents approximately 2.08% of the Companys total assets. See Note 4
Fair Value Measurements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements herein for additional
disclosures regarding the fair value of financial instruments.
Other Real Estate Owned
Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less
estimated costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. If fair value declines
subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Operating costs
after acquisition are expensed. Costs related to the development and improvement of property are
capitalized.
Investment Securities
The fair values for available-for-sale securities are generally based upon quoted market prices or
observable market prices for similar instruments. These values take into account recent market
activity as well as other market observable data such as interest rate, spread and prepayment
information. When market observable data is not available, which generally occurs due to the lack
of liquidity for certain securities, the valuation of the security is subjective and may involve
substantial judgment. The Company conducts periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each
available-for-sale security that has an unrealized loss for other-than-temporary impairment. An
unrealized loss exists when the fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized
cost basis. The primary factors the Company considers in determining whether an impairment is
other-than-temporary are the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including
any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer and whether the Company
intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had approximately
$4,750 of available-for-sale securities, which is approximately 0.30% of total assets, valued using
unobservable inputs (Level 3). These securities were primarily non-agency mortgage-backed
securities and subordinated debentures issued by financial institutions.
Results of Operations
Net income for the first six months of 2011 was $5,107, an increase of $2,232 compared with net
income of $2,875 for the first six months of 2010. The increase in net income
was primarily a
result of an increase in net interest income of $3,192 due primarily to declining costs of deposits
and an increased level of investments.
41
Table of Contents
Noninterest income decreased a net of $478 or 5.19% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
resulted from a decrease in gain on sales of loans offset in part by an increase in retail
investment income.
Gain on sales of loans decreased $649 or 18.15% as mortgage production decreased in the first six
months of 2011.
Retail investment income increased $213 or 28.36% due to increased brokerage activity and
improvement in the level of assets under management. Net investment securities gains year to date
are $118 as compared to net securities gains of $162 in 2010.
Noninterest expense totaled $19,838 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, a slight decrease of
$156 or 0.78% compared to the same period ended June 30, 2010. Notable changes included a decrease
in FDIC insurance of $114, a decrease in salaries and other personnel expense of $191 offset in
part by an increase in other real estate losses of $133.
Table 2 Selected Balance Sheet Data
June 30, | December 31, | Variance | ||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Amount | % | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash, due from banks
and interest-bearing deposits |
$ | 69,684 | $ | 65,115 | $ | 4,569 | 7.02 | % | ||||||||
Investment securities |
569,500 | 586,612 | (17,112 | ) | (2.92 | %) | ||||||||||
Loans |
873,801 | 874,095 | (294 | ) | (0.03 | %) | ||||||||||
Other real estate owned |
8,558 | 7,751 | 807 | 10.41 | % | |||||||||||
Assets |
1,599,921 | 1,607,105 | (7,184 | ) | (0.45 | %) | ||||||||||
Deposits |
1,402,000 | 1,410,737 | (8,737 | ) | (0.62 | %) | ||||||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
611 | 818 | (207 | ) | (25.31 | %) | ||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
52,000 | 60,000 | (8,000 | ) | (13.33 | %) | ||||||||||
Liabilities |
1,490,199 | 1,507,147 | (16,948 | ) | (1.12 | %) | ||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
109,722 | 99,958 | 9,764 | 9.77 | % |
Table 2 highlights significant changes in the balance sheet at June 30, 2011 as compared to
December 31, 2010. Total assets decreased a net of $7,184 and reflect a decrease in investment
securities of $17,112 coupled with an increase in cash, due from banks and interest bearing
deposits of $4,569 and an increase in bank-owned life insurance of $5,966. Deposits declined
$8,737 and advances from Federal Home Loan Bank declined $8,000. The Company has continued to
maintain a relatively high level of liquid funds in light of current economic conditions and
volatility in the banking industry but has elected to invest a portion of these funds and funds
obtained
42
Table of Contents
through deposit growth and loan repayments into the investment portfolio. Loan demand was
weak during the first six
months of 2011 and resulted in no loan growth The decrease in
investment securities during the year was due primarily to certain called bonds and selected sales
of high duration securities for interest rate risk management purposes.
The decrease in deposits was net of the repayment of approximately $23,528 in brokered deposits
which totaled $160,204 at June 30, 2011 compared to $183,732 at December 31, 2010. NOW accounts
decreased $12,867 and retail time deposits decreased $42,540. These decreases were offset by
savings accounts which increased $56,680 and noninterest-bearing deposits which increased $11,189.
The annualized return on average assets for the Company was 0.64% for the six months ended June 30,
2011, compared to 0.38% for the same period last year.
The annualized return on average stockholders equity was 10.09% for the six months ended June 30,
2011, compared to 5.94% for the same period last year.
Net Interest Income
The primary source of earnings for the Company is net interest income, which is the difference
between income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and interest
expense incurred on interest-bearing sources of funds, such as deposits and borrowings. The
following table shows the average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities, annualized average yields earned and rates paid on those respective balances, and the
actual interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated. Average balances are
calculated based on daily balances, yields on non-taxable investments are not reported on a tax
equivalent basis and average balances for loans include nonaccrual loans even though interest was
not earned.
43
Table of Contents
Table 3 Average Balances, Income and Expenses, Yields and Rates
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Annualized | Annualized | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Amount | Average | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield or | Paid or | Average | Yield or | Paid or | |||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Rate | Earned | Amount | Rate | Earned | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 881,038 | 5.78 | % | $ | 12,827 | $ | 937,226 | 5.73 | % | $ | 13,517 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
524,054 | 3.07 | % | 4,027 | 376,253 | 3.95 | % | 3,714 | ||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
48,533 | 3.98 | % | 483 | 22,654 | 4.26 | % | 241 | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
| 0.00 | % | | 7,300 | 0.16 | % | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other
banks |
30,952 | 0.49 | % | 38 | 66,515 | 0.57 | % | 94 | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
$ | 1,484,577 | 4.66 | % | $ | 17,375 | $ | 1,409,948 | 4.96 | % | $ | 17,569 | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 1,272,288 | 1.21 | % | $ | 3,842 | $ | 1,221,701 | 1.75 | % | $ | 5,319 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under repurchase
agreements |
696 | 0.86 | % | 1 | 1,390 | 1.44 | % | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
77,606 | 3.43 | % | 663 | 95,741 | 3.73 | % | 891 | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
$ | 1,350,590 | 1.34 | % | $ | 4,506 | $ | 1,318,832 | 1.89 | % | $ | 6,215 | ||||||||||||
Net interest margin/income: |
3.44 | % | $ | 12,869 | 3.19 | % | $ | 11,354 | ||||||||||||||||
44
Table of Contents
Table 4 Average Balances, Income and Expenses, Yields and Rates
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Annualized | Annualized | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Amount | Average | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield or | Paid or | Average | Yield or | Paid or | |||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Rate | Earned | Amount | Rate | Earned | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 880,580 | 5.77 | % | $ | 25,455 | $ | 938,620 | 5.71 | % | $ | 26,860 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
525,598 | 3.00 | % | 7,890 | 343,928 | 4.01 | % | 6,901 | ||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
46,879 | 4.01 | % | 940 | 22,196 | 4.26 | % | 473 | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
| 0.00 | % | | 7,300 | 0.19 | % | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
33,096 | 0.52 | % | 85 | 75,928 | 0.48 | % | 182 | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
$ | 1,486,153 | 4.62 | % | $ | 34,370 | $ | 1,387,972 | 4.95 | % | $ | 34,423 | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 1,276,307 | 1.25 | % | $ | 7,922 | $ | 1,195,442 | 1.80 | % | $ | 10,686 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under repurchase
agreements |
684 | 0.88 | % | 3 | 2,219 | 1.44 | % | 16 | ||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
80,262 | 3.46 | % | 1,377 | 98,011 | 3.80 | % | 1,845 | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
$ | 1,357,253 | 1.38 | % | $ | 9,302 | $ | 1,295,672 | 1.95 | % | $ | 12,547 | ||||||||||||
Net interest margin/income: |
3.36 | % | $ | 25,068 | 3.13 | % | $ | 21,876 | ||||||||||||||||
Second Quarter 2011 compared to Second Quarter 2010:
Net interest income increased $1,515 (13.34%) during the three month period as compared to the same
period in 2010. Loan interest income decreased $690 (5.10%) in the three month period primarily as
a result of decreased volume offset in part by slightly higher yields. Deposit interest expense
decreased $1,477 (27.77%) in the three month period primarily as a result of declining deposit
costs offset in part by growth in account balances. Annualized loan yields for the quarter
increased slightly from 5.73% in the prior period to 5.78% and were somewhat impacted by decreases
in levels of nonaccrual loans for the comparable periods. Nonaccrual loans resulted in the
reversal of $106 in interest income in the current quarter compared to $161 in the 2010 quarter.
Due to the low interest rate environment, the quarterly annualized average rate of interest bearing
liabilities decreased from 1.89% to 1.34% at June 30, 2011 compared to June 30, 2010.
The Companys net interest margin for the quarter was 3.44% as compared to 3.19% for the 2010
quarter. The increase in the net interest margin for the three month period was impacted by
several factors, including decreased levels of nonaccrual loans, an increase in the average taxable
investment portfolio of $147,801 (39.28%), a decrease in average loans of $56,188 (6.00%) and an
increase in average deposits of $50,587 (4.14%).
45
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended 2011 compared to Six Months Ended 2010:
Net interest income increased $3,192 (14.59%) during the six month period as compared to the same
period in 2010. Loan interest income decreased $1,405 (5.23%) in the six month period primarily as
a result of decreased volume offset in part by slightly higher yields. Deposit interest expense
decreased $2,764 (25.87%) in the six month period primarily as a result of declining deposit costs
offset in part by growth in account balances. Annualized loan yields for the year increased
slightly from 5.71% to 5.77% and were somewhat impacted by decreases in levels of nonaccrual loans
for the comparable periods. Nonaccrual loans resulted in the reversal of $174 in interest income
compared to $499 in 2010. Due to the low interest rate environment, the annualized average rate of
interest bearing liabilities decreased from 1.95% to 1.38% at June 30, 2011 compared to June 30,
2010.
The Companys net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was 3.36% as compared to
3.13% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in the net interest margin for the six
month period was primarily impacted by several factors, including decreased levels of nonaccrual
loans, an increase in the average taxable investment portfolio of $181,670 (52.82%), a decrease in
average loans of $58,040 (6.18%) and an increase in average deposits of $80,865 (6.76%).
Changes in the net interest income from period to period result from increases or decreases in the
volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, increases or decreases in the
average rates earned and paid on such assets and liabilities, the ability to manage the earning
asset portfolio, and the availability of particular sources of funds, such as noninterest-bearing
deposits. The following tables present the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes
in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have impacted the
Companys interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information is
provided in each category with respect to changes attributable to change in volume (change in
volume multiplied by prior rate), changes attributable to change in rate (change in rate multiplied
by prior volume), and changes in rate/volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume).
46
Table of Contents
Table 5 Rate/Volume Analysis
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 compared to June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) due to | ||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Combined | Total | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans |
(810 | ) | 128 | (8 | ) | (690 | ) | |||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
1,459 | (823 | ) | (323 | ) | 313 | ||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
275 | (16 | ) | (18 | ) | 241 | ||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | 3 | (3 | ) | |||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
(50 | ) | (12 | ) | 7 | (55 | ) | |||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
871 | (726 | ) | (339 | ) | (194 | ) | |||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
220 | (1,630 | ) | (67 | ) | (1,477 | ) | |||||||||
Securities sold under repurchase
agreements |
(2 | ) | (3 | ) | 1 | (4 | ) | |||||||||
Other borrowings |
(169 | ) | (73 | ) | 14 | (228 | ) | |||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
49 | (1,706 | ) | (52 | ) | (1,709 | ) | |||||||||
Net change in net interest income |
$ | 1,515 | ||||||||||||||
Table 6 Rate/Volume Analysis
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 compared to June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) due to | ||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Combined | Total | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans |
(1,661 | ) | 273 | (17 | ) | (1,405 | ) | |||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
3,645 | (1,738 | ) | (918 | ) | 989 | ||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
526 | (28 | ) | (31 | ) | 467 | ||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
(7 | ) | (7 | ) | 7 | (7 | ) | |||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
(103 | ) | 13 | (7 | ) | (97 | ) | |||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
2,400 | (1,487 | ) | (966 | ) | (53 | ) | |||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
723 | (3,266 | ) | (221 | ) | (2,764 | ) | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased / securities
sold under repurchase agreements |
(11 | ) | (6 | ) | 4 | (13 | ) | |||||||||
Other borrowings |
(334 | ) | (164 | ) | 30 | (468 | ) | |||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
378 | (3,436 | ) | (187 | ) | (3,245 | ) | |||||||||
Net change in net interest income |
$ | 3,192 | ||||||||||||||
47
Table of Contents
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is the charge to operating earnings necessary to maintain the
allowance for loan losses at a level which, in managements estimate, is adequate to cover the
estimated amount of probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses
totaled $3,424 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $3,794 for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and $6,664 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $7,082 for the
same period in 2010. See Allowance for Loan Losses for further analysis of the provision for
loan losses.
Noninterest Income
Table 7 Noninterest Income
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Variance | June 30, | Variance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Amount | % | 2011 | 2010 | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service charges and fees on deposits |
$ | 1,750 | $ | 1,748 | $ | 2 | 0.11 | % | $ | 3,328 | $ | 3,343 | $ | (15 | ) | (0.45 | %) | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sales of loans |
1,720 | 2,223 | (503 | ) | (22.63 | %) | 2,927 | 3,576 | (649 | ) | (18.15 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of fixed assets |
| | | 0.00 | % | 17 | 27 | (10 | ) | (37.04 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities gains (losses), net
of other-than-temporary impairment |
(30 | ) | 149 | (179 | ) | (120.13 | %) | 56 | 162 | (106 | ) | (65.43 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||
Retail investment income |
507 | 416 | 91 | 21.88 | % | 964 | 751 | 213 | 28.36 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust services fees |
292 | 290 | 2 | 0.69 | % | 565 | 577 | (12 | ) | (2.08 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Increase in cash surrender value of
bank-owned life insurance |
248 | 223 | 25 | 11.21 | % | 466 | 452 | 14 | 3.10 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous income |
191 | 156 | 35 | 22.44 | % | 404 | 317 | 87 | 27.44 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
$ | 4,678 | $ | 5,205 | $ | (527 | ) | (10.12 | %) | $ | 8,727 | $ | 9,205 | $ | (478 | ) | (5.19 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Second Quarter 2011 compared to Second Quarter 2010:
Noninterest income decreased $527 (10.12%) during the three month period as compared to the same
period in 2010. The most significant change for the three month period was a decrease in gain on
sales of loans due to reduced mortgage financing activity. Gain on sales of loans decreased $503
(22.63%). Increases in retail investment income, cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
and miscellaneous income were offset by decrease in investment securities gains (losses), net of
other-than-temporary impairment.
Six Months Ended 2011 compared to Six Months Ended 2010:
Noninterest income decreased $478 (5.19%) during the six month period as compared to the same
period in 2010. The most significant change for the six month period was a decrease in gain on
sales of loans due to reduced mortgage financing activity. Gain on
sales of loans decreased $649 (18.15%). Increases in retail investment income, cash
surrender
value of bank-owned life insurance and miscellaneous income were offset by decreases in investment
securities gains (losses), net of other-than-temporary impairment and services charges and fees on
deposits.
48
Table of Contents
Noninterest Expense
Table 8 Noninterest Expense
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | Variance | June 30, | Variance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Amount | % | 2011 | 2010 | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and other
personnel expense |
$ | 5,654 | $ | 5,915 | $ | (261 | ) | (4.41 | %) | $ | 11,218 | $ | 11,409 | $ | (191 | ) | (1.67 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Occupancy expenses |
1,112 | 1,166 | (54 | ) | (4.63 | %) | 2,227 | 2,337 | (110 | ) | (4.71 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing & business development |
365 | 294 | 71 | 24.15 | % | 699 | 588 | 111 | 18.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Processing expense |
408 | 392 | 16 | 4.08 | % | 820 | 758 | 62 | 8.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal and professional fees |
350 | 403 | (53 | ) | (13.15 | %) | 743 | 835 | (92 | ) | (11.02 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Data processing expense |
389 | 345 | 44 | 12.75 | % | 738 | 690 | 48 | 6.96 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
FDIC insurance |
362 | 552 | (190 | ) | (34.42 | %) | 979 | 1,093 | (114 | ) | (10.43 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Communications expense |
275 | 167 | 108 | 64.67 | % | 452 | 339 | 113 | 33.33 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of other real
estate |
231 | (28 | ) | 259 | (925.00 | %) | 213 | (369 | ) | 582 | (157.72 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for other real estate losses |
135 | 442 | (307 | ) | (69.46 | %) | 248 | 697 | (449 | ) | (64.42 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
782 | 914 | (132 | ) | (14.44 | %) | 1,501 | 1,617 | (116 | ) | (7.17 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
$ | 10,063 | $ | 10,562 | $ | (499 | ) | (4.72 | %) | $ | 19,838 | $ | 19,994 | $ | (156 | ) | (0.78 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Second Quarter 2011 compared to Second Quarter 2010:
Noninterest expense decreased $499 (4.72%) during the three month period as compared to the same
period in 2010. The most significant changes for the three month period were salaries and other
personnel expense which decreased $261 (4.41%) due to lower full time equivalent employees (FTEs)
as compared to the same period in 2010 and accrued FDIC insurance expense which decreased $190
(34.42%) due to a lower accrual rate for deposit insurance beginning in the second quarter of 2011.
Marketing, processing, communications and data processing expenses all increased but were offset
by decreases in legal and professional expense, higher OREO losses and reduced valuation allowance
provisions.
Occupancy expenses decreased $54 (4.63%) during the three month period and were primarily due to
decreased depreciation expense as a result of certain assets becoming fully depreciated.
Other real estate expenses decreased $48 and resulted from a decreased level of additions to the
OREO valuation allowance of $307 offset in part by an increase in losses on sales of OREO of $259
in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to 2010.
49
Table of Contents
Communications expense increased $108 (64.67%) and was due to costs associated with changing
carriers during the quarter. Processing expense increased $16 (4.08%) due to an increase in ATM
processing fees in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to 2010.
Six Months Ended 2011 compared to Six Months Ended 2010:
Salaries and other personnel expense decreased $191 (1.67%) during the six month period as compared
to the same period in 2010 and was due primarily to lower FTEs.
Occupancy expenses decreased $110 (4.71%) during the six month period and were primarily due to
decreased depreciation expense as a result of certain assets becoming fully depreciated.
Other real estate expenses increased $133 and resulted from a increased loss on sale of OREO of
$582 offset in part by a decreased level of additions to the OREO valuation allowance of $449 in
the first six months of 2011 as compared to 2010.
FDIC insurance expense decreased $114 (10.43%) and was due to a lower accrual rate for deposit
insurance beginning in the second quarter of 2011 offset in part by higher balances of insured
deposits. Processing expense increased $62 (8.18%) and was due to an increase in ATM processing
fees in the first six months of 2011 as compared to 2010.
Income Taxes
The Company recognized income tax expense of $1,255 and $2,186 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 as compared to an income tax expense of $583 and $1,130 for the same periods in 2010.
The significant increase in pretax income resulted in an increase in income tax expense and
slightly higher effective income tax rate for the three and six month periods. The effective
income tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was 30.91% and 29.97%,
respectively.
At June 30, 2011, the Company maintains net deferred tax assets of $12,917. ASC 740-30-25 provides
accounting guidance for determining when a company is required to record a valuation allowance on
its deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is required for deferred tax assets if, based on
available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the asset may not be
realized due to the inability to generate sufficient taxable income in the period and/or of the
character necessary to utilize the benefit of the deferred tax asset. In making this assessment,
all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset are considered including
taxable income in prior carry-back years, future reversals of existing temporary differences, tax
planning strategies and future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and
carryforwards.
Based on managements assessment, no valuation allowance was deemed necessary at June 30, 2011.
The Company has no net operating loss carryforwards. The Company was able to carryback both the
federal and state net operating losses (NOLs) sustained in 2009.
50
Table of Contents
These carrybacks generated a
federal tax refund of $2,755 that was received in the first quarter of 2010 and a state tax refund
of $495 that has not been received as of June 30, 2011.
Loans
The following table presents the composition of the Companys loan portfolio as of June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010.
Table 9 Loan Portfolio Composition
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial financial and
agricultural |
$ | 185,106 | 21.18 | % | $ | 189,128 | 21.64 | % | ||||||||
Real estate |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
335,841 | 38.43 | % | 327,458 | 37.46 | % | ||||||||||
Residential |
162,184 | 18.56 | % | 157,680 | 18.04 | % | ||||||||||
Acquisition, development
and construction |
175,771 | 20.12 | % | 182,412 | 20.87 | % | ||||||||||
Total real estate |
673,796 | 77.11 | % | 667,550 | 76.37 | % | ||||||||||
Consumer |
||||||||||||||||
Direct |
14,149 | 1.61 | % | 15,643 | 1.79 | % | ||||||||||
Indirect |
597 | 0.07 | % | 899 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
Revolving |
229 | 0.03 | % | 870 | 0.10 | % | ||||||||||
Total consumer |
14,975 | 1.71 | % | 17,412 | 1.99 | % | ||||||||||
Deferred loan origination costs (fees) |
(76 | ) | 0.00 | % | 5 | 0.00 | % | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 873,801 | 100.00 | % | $ | 874,095 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
At June 30, 2011, the loan portfolio is comprised of 77.11% real estate loans. Commercial,
financial and agricultural loans comprise 21.18%, and consumer loans comprise 1.71% of the
portfolio.
Commercial real estate comprises 38.43% of the loan portfolio and consist of both non-owner
occupied and owner occupied properties where the operations of the commercial entity provide the
necessary cash flow to service the debt. For this portion of the real estate loan portfolio,
repayment is not dependent upon the sale of the real estate held as collateral. Construction and
development loans comprise 20.12% of the real estate loan portfolio and the Company has recognized
significant losses in this portfolio. The Company carefully monitors the loans in this category
since the repayment of these loans
is generally dependent upon the sale of the real estate in the normal course of business and can be
impacted by national and local economic conditions. New construction and absorption of existing
real estate inventory in the Companys primary market area of the Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC
MSA have slowed and prices have declined but less than the national rate. Conditions on certain
loans the Company has made in markets outside the Companys primary market area are outlined in
Table 12. The residential
category, 18.56% of the portfolio, represents those loans that the
Company chooses to maintain in its portfolio rather than selling into the secondary market for
marketing and competitive reasons and commercial loans secured by residential real estate.
51
Table of Contents
The Company has no large loan concentrations to individual borrowers. Unsecured loans at June 30,
2011 totaled $14,865.
Interest reserves are established for certain ADC (acquisition development and construction) loans
based on the feasibility of the project, the timeframe for completion, the creditworthiness of the
borrower and guarantors, and collateral. An interest reserve allows the borrowers interest cost
to be capitalized and added to the loan balance. As a matter of practice the Banks do not
generally establish loan funded interest reserves on ADC loans; however, the Companys loan
portfolio includes six loans with interest reserves at June 30, 2011, which were fully advanced at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Underwriting for ADC loans with interest reserves follows the same process as those loans without
reserves. In order for the Banks to establish a loan-funded interest reserve, the borrower must
have the ability to repay without the use of a reserve and a history of developing and stabilizing
similar properties. All ADC loans, including those with interest reserves, are carefully monitored
through periodic construction site inspections by bank employees or third party inspectors to
ensure projects are moving along as planned. Management assesses the appropriateness of the use of
interest reserves during the entire term of the loan as well as the adequacy of the reserve.
Collateral inspections are completed before approval of advances. Two of these loans have been
renewed; one due to delays and time needed to obtain current financial information on the
guarantors and another to allow for completion of the final punch list and negotiation of the
permanent loan. None of these loans have been restructured or are currently on nonaccrual.
Loan Review and Classification Process
The Company maintains a loan review and classification process which involves multiple officers of
the Company and is designed to assess the general quality of credit underwriting and to promote
early identification of potential problem loans. All loan officers are charged with the
responsibility of risk rating all loans in their portfolios and updating the ratings, positively or
negatively, on an ongoing basis as conditions warrant. Risk ratings are selected from an 8-point
scale with ratings as follows: ratings 1- 4 Satisfactory (pass), rating 5 Watch (potential
weakness), rating 6 Substandard (well-defined weakness), rating 7 Doubtful and rating 8 Loss.
When a loan officer originates a new loan, he or she documents the credit file with an offering
sheet summary, supplemental underwriting analyses, relevant financial information and collateral
evaluations. All of this information is used in the determination of the initial loan risk rating.
Then, the Companys Credit Administration department undertakes an independent credit review of
that relationship in order to
validate the lending officers rating. Lending relationships with
total related exposure of $500 or greater are also placed into a tracking database and reviewed by
Credit Administration personnel on an annual basis in conjunction with the receipt of updated
borrower and guarantor financial information. The individual loan reviews analyze such items as:
loan type; nature, type and estimated value of collateral; borrower and/or guarantor estimated
financial strength; most recently available financial information; related loans and total borrower
exposure; and current/anticipated performance of the loan. The results of such reviews are
presented to Executive Management.
52
Table of Contents
Through the review of delinquency reports, updated financial statements or other relevant
information in the normal course of business, the lending officer and/or Credit Administration
review personnel may determine that a loan relationship has weakened to the point that a criticized
(loan grade 5) or classified (loan grade 6 through 8) status is warranted. When a loan relationship
with total related exposure of $200 or greater is adversely graded (5 or above), the lending
officer is then charged with preparing a Classified/Watch report which outlines the background of
the credit problem, current repayment status of the loans, current collateral evaluation and a
workout plan of action. This plan may include goals to improve the credit rating, assisting the
borrower in moving the loans to another institution and/or collateral liquidation. All such
Classified/Watch reports are reviewed on a quarterly basis by members of Executive Management at a
regularly scheduled meeting in which each lending officer presents the workout plans for their
criticized credit relationships.
Depending upon the individual facts, circumstances and the result of the Classified/Watch review
process, Executive Management may categorize the loan relationship as impaired. Once that
determination has occurred, Executive Management in conjunction with Credit Administration
personnel, will complete an evaluation of the collateral (for collateral-dependent loans) based
upon appraisals on file adjusting for current market conditions and other local factors that may
affect collateral value. This judgmental evaluation may produce an initial specific allowance for
placement in the Companys Allowance for Loan Losses calculation. As soon as practical, updated
appraisals on the collateral backing that impaired loan relationship are ordered. When the updated
appraisals are received, Executive Management with assistance from Credit Administration department
personnel reviews the appraisal, and updates the specific allowance analysis for each loan
relationship accordingly. The Directors Loan Committee reviews on a quarterly basis the
Classified/Watch reports including changes in credit grades of 5 or higher as well as all impaired
loans, the related allowances and OREO.
In general, once the specific allowance has been finalized, Executive Management will authorize a
charge-off prior to the following calendar quarter-end in which that reserve calculation is
finalized.
The review process also provides for the upgrade of loans that show improvement since the last
review.
53
Table of Contents
Nonperforming Assets
Non-performing assets include nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days or more, restructured loans
and other real estate owned. Table 10 shows the current and prior period amounts of non-performing
assets. Non-performing assets were $36,582 at June 30, 2011, compared to $34,000 at December 31,
2010 and $39,926 at June 30, 2010. Significant changes from December 2010 to June 2011 include a
$3,723 increase in nonaccrual commercial real estate loans and a decrease of $2,695 in nonaccrual
ADC loans. Total nonaccrual loans increased $1,527.
There were no loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing at June 30, 2011 compared to $69 at
December 31, 2010 and $299 at June 30, 2010.
Troubled debt Restructurings (TDRs) are troubled loans on which the original terms have been
modified in favor of the borrower or either principal or interest has been forgiven due to
deterioration in the borrowers financial condition. There were $4,733 in TDRs at June 30, 2011,
of which $1,941 were on nonaccrual status. TDRs totaled $3,514 at December 31, 2010, of which $970
were on nonaccrual status, and $1,748 at June 30, 2010, of which $830 were on nonaccrual status.
54
Table of Contents
Table 10 Non-Performing Assets
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans: |
||||||||||||
Commercial financial and agricultural |
$ | 2,972 | $ | 2,924 | $ | 637 | ||||||
Real Estate: |
||||||||||||
Commercial |
7,516 | 3,793 | 10,038 | |||||||||
Residential |
5,232 | 4,734 | 4,601 | |||||||||
Acquisition, development and construction |
9,258 | 11,953 | 16,054 | |||||||||
Consumer |
254 | 301 | 473 | |||||||||
Total Nonaccrual loans |
25,232 | 23,705 | 31,803 | |||||||||
Restructured loans (1) |
2,792 | 2,544 | 918 | |||||||||
Other real estate owned |
8,558 | 7,751 | 7,205 | |||||||||
Total Non-performing assets |
$ | 36,582 | $ | 34,000 | $ | 39,926 | ||||||
Loans past due 90 days or more
and still accruing interest |
$ | | $ | 69 | $ | 299 | ||||||
Non-performing assets to total assets |
2.29 | % | 2.12 | % | 2.53 | % | ||||||
Non-performing assets to total loans and OREO |
4.15 | % | 3.86 | % | 4.40 | % | ||||||
Allowance for loan loss to total nonaccrual loans |
112.59 | % | 112.45 | % | 74.92 | % |
(1) | Restructured loans on nonaccrual status at period end are included under nonaccrual loans in
the table. |
The ratio of non-performing assets to total loans and other real estate was 4.15% at June 30, 2011
compared to 3.86% at December 31, 2010 and 4.40% at June 30, 2010. The ratio of allowance for loan
losses to total nonaccrual loans was 112.59% at June 30, 2011 compared to 112.45% at December 31,
2010 and 74.92% at June 30, 2010. The resolution of non-performing assets continues to be a
priority of management.
The following table presents a roll forward of other real estate owned for the six month period
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
55
Table of Contents
Table 11 Other Real Estate Owned
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Beginning balance, January 1 |
$ | 7,751 | 7,974 | |||||
Additions |
3,353 | 5,544 | ||||||
Increase in valuation allowance |
(248 | ) | (697 | ) | ||||
Sales |
(2,085 | ) | (5,985 | ) | ||||
(Loss) gain on sale of OREO |
(213 | ) | 369 | |||||
Ending balance, June 30 |
$ | 8,558 | 7,205 | |||||
The following table provides details of other real estate owned as of June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Other Real Estate: |
||||||||
Single family developed lots |
$ | 1,641 | $ | 2,350 | ||||
Residential land |
1,853 | | ||||||
1-4 Family residential |
625 | 1,071 | ||||||
Commercial real estate |
3,734 | 1,925 | ||||||
Condominums |
2,827 | 2,827 | ||||||
10,680 | 8,173 | |||||||
Valuation allowance |
(2,122 | ) | (968 | ) | ||||
$ | 8,558 | $ | 7,205 | |||||
The increase in other real estate owned is due to the continuing process of resolving problem
loans. In the first six months of 2011, proceeds from sales of other real estate totaled $2,085.
In addition, there was a $248 increase to the valuation allowance as a result of declining property
values. The net decrease in nonaccrual loans from June 30, 2010 reflects a significant decline in
ADC properties that the Company has been actively addressing over the past year. A significant
portion of nonaccrual loans are collateral dependent ADC and residential real estate loans. The
following table provides further information regarding the Companys nonaccrual loans.
56
Table of Contents
Nonaccrual | Appraisal | Appraised | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Originated | Date | Trigger | Collateral | Allowance | Method | Date | Value | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1-4 Family Residential |
$ | 1,086 | 05/08-06/08 | 12/14/10 | financial condition | houses & land | $ | | collateral value | 03/11 | $ | 1,450 | ||||||||||||||
ADC Loan Greenville |
885 | 04/08 - 05/08 | 06/30/11 | delinquency | lots | 105 | collateral value | 04/08 - 05/08 | 6,455 | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate |
3,789 | 03/10/08 | 06/30/11 | delinquency | commercial bldg | 370 | collateral value | 01/08 - 02/08 | 7,525 | |||||||||||||||||
ADC Loan Savannah, Georgia |
1,312 | 09/30/08 | 05/06/10 | delinquency | lots & land | | collateral value | 06/10 | 1,650 | |||||||||||||||||
ADC Loan CSRA |
1,009 | 03/07-04/08 | 11/30/09 | delinquency | lots & land | | collateral value | 03/11 | 1,075 | |||||||||||||||||
Farmland & Equity lines |
843 | 09/18/08 | 11/10-12/10 | financial condition | house & land | | collateral value | 11/10 - 12/10 | 1,943 | |||||||||||||||||
1-4 Family Residential |
765 | 04/19/07 | 06/21/10 | financial condition | house | | collateral value | 08/10 | 895 | |||||||||||||||||
ADC Loan Athens, Georgia |
934 | 09/07/07 | 12/16/10 | financial condition | lots & land | | collateral value | 03/11 | 1,038 | |||||||||||||||||
ADC Loan Athens, Georgia |
1,974 | 08/06-01/07 | 01/28/09 | delinquency | land & townhomes | | collateral value | 09/10 - 04/11 | 2,354 | |||||||||||||||||
ADC Loan Georgia Loan Participation |
1,500 | 03/29/11 | 03/29/11 | financial condition | land | | collateral value | 06/11 | 2,178 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 14,097 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other, net |
11,135 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2011 |
$ | 25,232 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents an allocation for the estimated amount of probable
incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated
periodically based on a review of all significant loans, with particular emphasis on impaired,
non-accruing, past due, and other loans that management believes require special attention. The
determination of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate of the
Company. See Critical Accounting Estimates.
While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the
allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various
regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the
Companys allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may advise additions to the allowance based on
their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Such
regulatory guidance is considered, and the Company may recognize additions to the allowance as a
result.
Additions to the allowance for loan losses are made periodically to maintain the allowance at an
appropriate level based upon managements analysis of risk in the loan portfolio. Loans determined
to be uncollectible are charged to the allowance for loan losses and subsequent recoveries are
added to the allowance. A provision for losses in the amount of $3,424 was charged to expense for
the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $3,794 for the 2010 quarter and $6,664 for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $7,082 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Significant portions of the overall level of losses in 2011 relate to the charge off of specific
reserve allowances on impaired loans. The following table provides selected asset quality
information related to the acquisition, development and construction loan portfolio as of June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010.
57
Table of Contents
Table 12 Acquisition Development and Construction Loans
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
CSRA primary market area |
||||||||
Period-end loans |
$ | 146,511 | $ | 148,570 | ||||
Impaired loans |
3,137 | 4,492 | ||||||
Other classified/watch rated loans |
19,877 | 27,719 | ||||||
Annualized charge-offs (recoveries) % |
1.04 | % | 2.20 | % | ||||
Specific reserve allowance / Impaired loans |
0.00 | % | 3.47 | % | ||||
General reserve allowance / Loans not impaired % |
3.92 | % | 3.43 | % | ||||
Allowance / Charge-offs |
3.70 | 1.56 | ||||||
Savannah, Georgia |
||||||||
Period-end loans |
$ | 11,911 | $ | 10,985 | ||||
Impaired loans |
1,534 | 2,066 | ||||||
Other classified/watch rated loans |
419 | 638 | ||||||
Annualized charge-offs (recoveries) % |
5.04 | % | 13.32 | % | ||||
Specific reserve allowance / Impaired loans |
0.00 | % | 8.47 | % | ||||
General reserve allowance / Loans not impaired % |
3.06 | % | 3.13 | % | ||||
Allowance / Charge-offs |
0.53 | 0.31 | ||||||
Athens, Georgia |
||||||||
Period-end loans |
$ | 8,773 | $ | 11,178 | ||||
Impaired loans |
2,909 | 4,193 | ||||||
Other classified/watch rated loans |
1,528 | 1,439 | ||||||
Annualized charge-offs (recoveries) % |
13.59 | % | 3.38 | % | ||||
Specific reserve allowance / Impaired loans |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
General reserve allowance / Loans not impaired % |
11.34 | % | 11.40 | % | ||||
Allowance / Charge-offs |
0.56 | 2.11 | ||||||
ADC Participations Georgia |
||||||||
Period-end loans |
$ | 6,500 | $ | 6,500 | ||||
Impaired loans |
| | ||||||
Other classified/watch rated loans |
6,500 | 6,500 | ||||||
Annualized charge-offs (recoveries) % |
0.00 | % | 22.52 | % | ||||
Specific reserve allowance / Impaired loans |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
General reserve allowance / Loans not impaired % |
20.75 | % | 15.00 | % | ||||
Allowance / Charge-offs |
0 | 0.67 | ||||||
ADC Loans Greenville |
||||||||
Period-end loans |
$ | 1,555 | $ | 1,673 | ||||
Impaired loans |
885 | 150 | ||||||
Other classified/watch rated loans |
65 | 821 | ||||||
Annualized charge-offs (recoveries) % |
(0.16 | %) | 17.33 | % | ||||
Specific reserve allowance / Impaired loans |
11.86 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
General reserve allowance / Loans not impaired % |
10.99 | % | 18.65 | % | ||||
Allowance / Charge-offs |
(14.92 | ) | 0.21 | |||||
ADC Participations Florida |
||||||||
Period-end loans |
$ | 521 | $ | 3,506 | ||||
Impaired loans |
521 | 3,506 | ||||||
Other classified/watch rated loans |
| | ||||||
Annualized charge-offs (recoveries) % |
44.10 | % | 5.56 | % | ||||
Specific reserve allowance / Impaired loans |
0.00 | % | 25.33 | % | ||||
General reserve allowance / Loans not impaired % |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
Allowance / Charge-offs |
| 4.55 |
58
Table of Contents
At June 30, 2011 the ratio of allowance for loan losses to period end loans was 3.25% compared to
3.05% at December 31, 2010 and 2.65% at June 30, 2010. Net charge-offs totaled $4,911 of which
$2,538, or 51.68%, were related to ADC loans. Of the ADC charge-offs $888 or 34.99% were related
to collateral dependent ADC loan participations, $760 or 29.94% were related to ADC loans in the
CSRA and $596 or 23.48% were related to ADC loans in the Athens, Georgia market. The provision for
loan losses allocated to individual portfolio segments are affected by the calculation of average
historical net loss rate factors and by the internal and external qualitative factors within each
category. The loan loss provision allocated to the commercial, financial and agricultural
portfolio was $1,581 and was affected in part by an increase in the adjusted historical loss factor
and qualitative factors related to collateral values. The loan loss provision allocated to the
ADC-CSRA portfolio was $1,290 and was affected in part by an increase in the level of substandard
rated loans and qualitative factors related to trends in classified loans, collateral values and
other external factors related to competition, legal and regulatory requirements. The loan loss
provision allocated to the non owner occupied and owner occupied commercial real estate portfolio
was $235 and $2,026 respectively and was affected in part by an increase in the level of impaired
loans, substandard rated loans and qualitative factors related to trends in impaired, classified
and rated loans. See note 3 to the Financial Statements.
59
Table of Contents
Table 13 Allowance for Loan Losses
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Total loans outstanding at end of period,
net of unearned income |
$ | 873,801 | $ | 900,167 | ||||
Average loans outstanding, net of
unearned income |
$ | 869,604 | $ | 912,181 | ||||
Balance of allowance for loan losses at
beginning of year |
$ | 26,657 | $ | 22,338 | ||||
Charge-offs: |
||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
1,304 | 343 | ||||||
Real estate commercial |
627 | 463 | ||||||
Real estate residential mortgage |
764 | 564 | ||||||
Real estate acquisition, development
and construction |
2,544 | 4,838 | ||||||
Consumer |
73 | 290 | ||||||
Total charge-offs |
5,312 | 6,498 | ||||||
Recoveries of previous loan losses: |
||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
304 | 116 | ||||||
Real estate commercial |
| 5 | ||||||
Real estate residential mortgage |
8 | 33 | ||||||
Real estate acquisition, development
and construction |
6 | 530 | ||||||
Consumer |
83 | 220 | ||||||
Total recoveries |
401 | 904 | ||||||
Net loan losses |
4,911 | 5,594 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
6,664 | 7,082 | ||||||
Balance of allowance for loan losses at
end of period |
$ | 28,410 | $ | 23,826 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses to period end
loans |
3.25 | % | 2.65 | % | ||||
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans |
1.14 | % | 1.24 | % |
Management considers the current allowance for loan losses appropriate based upon its analysis in
the portfolio using the methods previously discussed. Managements judgment is based upon a number
of assumptions about events which are believed to be reasonable, but which may or may not prove
correct. While it is the Companys policy to charge off in the current period the loans in which a
loss is considered probable, there are additional risks of losses which cannot be quantified
precisely or attributed to a particular loan or class of loans. Because management evaluates such
factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan
60
Table of Contents
portfolio, historical loss rates, overall
portfolio quality,
review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions and trends
that may affect a borrowers ability to repay, managements judgment as to the adequacy of the
allowance is necessarily approximate and imprecise. Thus, there can be no assurance that
charge-offs in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses or that additional
increases in the allowance will not be required.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company has maintained adequate liquidity to meet operating and loan funding requirements
despite the lack of such demand due to current market conditions. The loan
to deposit ratio at June 30, 2011 was 62.33% compared to 61.96% at December 31, 2010 and 65.64% at
June 30, 2010. The decrease in the loan to deposit ratio from June 30, 2010 to June 30, 2011
reflects the decreased demand for loans resulting from the slowing economy coupled with an
increased level of deposits. Deposits at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 include $160,204 and
$183,732 of brokered certificates of deposit, respectively. GB&T and SB&T have also utilized
borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank. They each maintain a line of credit with the Federal
Home Loan Bank approximating 10% of their total assets. Federal Home Loan Bank advances are
collateralized by eligible first mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans and investment
securities. These borrowings totaled $52,000 at June 30, 2011. GB&T and SB&T maintain repurchase
lines of credit with SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Atlanta, Georgia, for advances up to $20,000 and
$10,000, respectively, of which no amounts were outstanding at June 30, 2011. GB&T and SB&T have
federal funds purchased accommodations with SunTrust Bank, Atlanta, Georgia for advances up to
$10,000 and $3,750 respectively. GB&T also has a $10,000 repurchase line of credit with Center
State Bank, Orlando, Florida. Additionally, liquidity needs can be supplemented by the structuring
of the maturities of investment securities and the pricing and maturities on loans and deposits
offered to customers. The Company also uses retail securities sold under repurchase agreements to
fund operations. Retail securities sold under repurchase agreements were $611 at June 30, 2011.
Stockholders equity to total assets was 6.86% at June 30, 2011 compared to 6.22% at December 31,
2010 and 6.45% at June 30, 2010. The capital of the Company exceeded all required regulatory
guidelines at June 30, 2011. The Companys Tier 1 risk-based, total risk-based and leverage
capital ratios were 12.53%, 13.92%, and 7.95%, respectively, at June 30, 2011.
The following table reflects the current regulatory capital levels in more detail, including
comparisons to the regulatory minimums.
61
Table of Contents
Table 14 Regulatory Capital Requirements
June 30, 2011
June 30, 2011
Required for capital | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | adequacy purposes | Excess | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southeastern Bank Financial
Corporation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk-based capital: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital |
$ | 127,236 | 12.53 | % | 40,611 | 4.00 | % | 86,625 | 8.53 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total capital |
141,300 | 13.92 | % | 81,222 | 8.00 | % | 60,078 | 5.92 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 leverage ratio |
127,236 | 7.95 | % | 64,015 | 4.00 | % | 63,221 | 3.95 | % | |||||||||||||||
Georgia Bank & Trust Company |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk-based capital: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital |
$ | 112,035 | 12.53 | % | 35,771 | 4.00 | % | 76,264 | 8.53 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total capital |
123,388 | 13.80 | % | 71,542 | 8.00 | % | 51,846 | 5.80 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 leverage ratio |
112,035 | 7.90 | % | 63,815 | 4.50 | % | 48,220 | 3.40 | % | |||||||||||||||
Southern Bank & Trust |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk-based capital: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital |
$ | 14,980 | 12.36 | % | 4,848 | 4.00 | % | 10,132 | 8.36 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total capital |
16,514 | 13.62 | % | 9,696 | 8.00 | % | 6,818 | 5.62 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 leverage ratio |
14,980 | 8.15 | % | 7,352 | 4.00 | % | 7,628 | 4.15 | % |
Georgia Bank & Trust Company is regulated by the Department of Banking and Finance of the State of
Georgia (DBF). The DBF requires that state banks in Georgia generally maintain a minimum ratio of
Tier 1 capital to total assets of four and one-half percent (4.50%).
Management is not aware of any other events or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to have a
material effect on the Companys liquidity, capital resources or operations.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
The Company is a party to lines of credit with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers. Lines of credit are unfunded commitments to
extend credit. These instruments involve, in varying degrees, exposure to credit and interest rate
risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the financial statements. The Companys exposure to
credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for
unfunded commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is represented by the contractual
amount of those instruments. The Company evaluates construction and acquisition and development
loans for the percentage completed before extending additional credit. The Company follows the
same
credit policies in making commitments and contractual obligations as it does for on-balance sheet
instruments.
62
Table of Contents
Unfunded commitments to extend credit where contract amounts represent potential credit risk
totaled $140,555 at June 30, 2011. These commitments are primarily at variable interest rates.
The Companys commitments are funded through internal funding sources of scheduled repayments of
loans and sales and maturities of investment securities available-for-sale or external funding
sources through acceptance of deposits from customers or borrowings from other financial
institutions.
The following table is a summary of the Companys commitments to extend credit, commitments under
contractual leases as well as the Companys contractual obligations, consisting of deposits, FHLB
advances, which are subject to early termination options, and borrowed funds by contractual
maturity date.
Table 15 Commitments and Contractual Obligations
Less than | 1 - 3 | 3 - 5 | More than | |||||||||||||
1 Year | Years | Years | 5 Years | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Lines of credit |
$ | 140,555 | | | | |||||||||||
Lease agreements |
270 | 139 | 80 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Deposits |
1,224,307 | 148,415 | 28,672 | 606 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under
repurchase agreements |
611 | | | | ||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
| 13,000 | | 39,000 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
| 2,947 | | 20,000 | ||||||||||||
Total commitments and
contractual obligations |
$ | 1,365,743 | $ | 164,501 | $ | 28,752 | $ | 59,615 | ||||||||
Although management regularly monitors the balance of outstanding commitments to fund loans to
ensure funding availability should the need arise, management believes that the risk of all
customers fully drawing on all these lines of credit at the same time is remote.
Effects of Inflation and Changing Prices
Inflation generally increases the cost of funds and operating overhead, and to the extent loans and
other assets bear variable rates, the yields on such assets. Unlike most industrial companies,
virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As
a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on
the performance of a financial institution than the effects of general levels of inflation.
63
Table of Contents
Although interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction and to the same extent as the
prices of goods and services, increases in inflation generally have resulted in increased interest
rates. In addition, inflation can increase a financial institutions cost of goods and services
purchased, the cost of salaries and benefits, occupancy expense and similar items. Inflation and
related increases in interest rates generally decrease the market value of investments and loans
held and may adversely affect liquidity, earnings, and stockholders equity. Mortgage originations
and refinances tend to slow as interest rates increase, and can reduce the Companys earnings from
such activities and the income from the sale of residential mortgage loans in the secondary market.
Regulatory Reform Legislation
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank
Reform Act) was signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Reform Act represents a significant overhaul of
many aspects of the regulation of the financial services industry, although many of its provisions
(e.g., the interchange and trust preferred capital limitations) apply to companies that are
significantly larger than the Company. The Dodd-Frank Reform Act directs applicable regulatory
authorities to promulgate regulations implementing its provisions, and its effect on the Company
and on the financial services industry as a whole will be clarified as those regulations are
issued. Major elements of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act include:
A permanent increase in deposit insurance coverage to $250,000 per account, permanent unlimited
deposit insurance on noninterest-bearing transaction accounts, and an increase in the minimum
Deposit Insurance Fund reserve requirement from 1.15% to 1.35%, with assessments to be based on
assets as opposed to deposits.
New disclosure and other requirements relating to executive compensation and corporate
governance.
Amendments to the Truth in Lending Act aimed at improving consumer protections with respect to
mortgage originations, including originator compensation, minimum repayment standards, and
prepayment considerations.
The establishment of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which will be responsible for
identifying and monitoring systemic risks posed by financial firms, activities, and practices.
The development of regulations to limit debit card interchange fees.
The future elimination of trust preferred securities as a permitted element of Tier 1 capital.
The creation of a special regime to allow for the orderly liquidation of systemically important
financial companies, including the establishment of an orderly liquidation fund.
64
Table of Contents
The development of regulations to address derivatives markets, including clearing and exchange
trading requirements and a framework for regulating derivatives-market participants.
Enhanced supervision of credit rating agencies through the Office of Credit Ratings within the
SEC.
Increased regulation of asset-backed securities, including a requirement that issuers of
asset-backed securities retain at least 5% of the risk of the asset-backed securities.
The establishment of a Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, within the Federal Reserve, to
serve as a dedicated consumer-protection regulatory body.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As of June 30, 2011, there were no substantial changes in the interest rate sensitivity analysis or
the sensitivity of market value of portfolio equity for various changes in interest rates
calculated as of December 31, 2010. A detailed discussion of market risk is provided in the
Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys
President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and its Group Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15.
Based upon that evaluation, such officers concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company
(including its consolidated subsidiaries) that is required to be included in the Companys periodic
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. There have been no changes in the Companys
internal controls or, to the Companys knowledge, in other factors during the quarter covered by
this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
65
Table of Contents
Part II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or any of its
subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is subject.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully
consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could
materially affect its business, financial condition or future results. The risks
described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the
Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to management or
that management currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely
affect the Companys business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On April 15, 2004, the Company announced the commencement of a stock repurchase
program, pursuant to which it will, from time to time, repurchase up to 100,000
shares of its outstanding stock. The program does not have a stated expiration
date. No stock repurchase programs were terminated during the second quarter of
2011 and there were no shares repurchased under the existing stock repurchase plan
or otherwise during the second quarter.
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
Not applicable
Item 4. | [Removed and Reserved] |
Item 5. | Other Information |
None
66
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. |
||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
||
101 | Interactive Data Files providing financial information from the
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2011 in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language).
Pursuant to Regulation 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive
data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or
prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and are otherwise not subject to liability. |
67
Table of Contents
SOUTHEASTERN BANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Form 10-Q Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SOUTHEASTERN BANK FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Date: July 29, 2011
|
By: | /s/ Darrell R. Rains
|
||
Group Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(Duly Authorized Officer of Registrant and | ||||
Principal Financial Officer) |
68