Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - 8-K - TCF FINANCIAL CORP | a10-19620_38k.htm |
Exhibit 99.1
TCF Financial Corporation
2010 Third Quarter Investor Presentation
Built on convenience, stability and trust.
1.) Corporate Profile
At September 30, 2010
· $18.3 billion bank holding company headquartered in Minnesota
· 36th largest publicly traded U.S. based bank by asset size
· 440 bank branches in eight states, 69 branches opened since January 1, 2005
· 23rd largest U.S. branch network
· Seven campus alliances; 5th largest in campus card banking relationships
· 983 ATMs free to TCF customers; 500 off-site
· 11th largest issuer of Visa® Classic debit cards
· 12th largest issuer of Visa Commercial debit cards
· 13th largest bank-affiliated leasing company in the U.S.
· Total equity to total assets of 8.22%
· Tangible realized common equity of 7.27% 1
· 62nd consecutive quarter of profitability
Branch Summary
Minnesota |
|
110 |
|
Illinois |
|
200 |
|
Michigan |
|
55 |
|
Colorado |
|
36 |
|
Wisconsin |
|
26 |
|
Arizona |
|
7 |
|
Indiana |
|
5 |
|
South Dakota |
|
1 |
|
Total |
|
440 |
|
Well-Diversified Loan Portfolio
($ millions)
|
|
12/31/99 |
|
% of Total |
|
9/30/10 |
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Consumer Lending |
|
$ |
5,978 |
|
76 |
% |
$ |
7,280 |
|
49 |
% |
|
|
Commercial Lending |
|
1,425 |
|
18 |
|
3,663 |
|
25 |
|
|
|
||
Leasing |
|
493 |
|
6 |
|
3,158 |
|
21 |
|
|
|
||
Inventory Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
796 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
7,896 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
14,897 |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1 See Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures - Tangible Realized Common Equity slide
2.) What Makes TCF Different
At September 30, 2010
· Convenience
TCF banks a large and diverse customer base by offering a host of convenient banking services:
· Traditional, supermarket and campus branches open seven days a week
· Free debit cards, free coin counting and 983 free ATMs
· TCF Free Online banking
· Credit Quality
· TCF is primarily a secured portfolio lender, emphasizing credit quality over asset growth
· Core deposit funding for national diverse lending platform
· Grew core deposits by $442.8 million year-over-year; decreased total certificate of deposit balances by $607.3 million year-over-year
· Increased nationally-oriented specialty finance businesses by $666.7 million year-over-year
3.) What Makes TCF Different (continued)
· No deficient foreclosure procedures
· No teaser rate or subprime lending programs
· No option ARM loans
· No mortgage repurchase risk
· No low-doc/no-doc loans
· No Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae preferred stock
· No non-agency mortgage-backed securities
· No off-balance-sheet funding or securitizations
· No bank-owned life insurance
· No mortgage servicing rights
4.) Dodd-Frank Act Highlights
· Directs Federal Reserve to issue rules limiting debit card interchange fees (Durbin Amendment)
· Phases out trust preferred securities as a component of tier 1 capital beginning in 2013 (Collins Amendment)
· Creates a new consumer protection bureau that will have rulemaking authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws applying to all banks and other non-bank financial services companies
· Changes standards of Federal preemption of state laws related to federally chartered institutions and their subsidiaries
· Mortgage reform including a customers ability to repay
· Requires publicly-traded bank holding companies with $10 billion or more in total assets to establish a Board of Directors risk committee responsible for enterprise-wide risk management practices
5.) Diversified Revenue Base
At September 30, 2010
Good Revenue Growth +8%*
($ millions)
|
|
12/06 |
|
12/07 |
|
12/08 |
|
12/09 |
|
9/10 (1) |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Interest Income |
|
$ |
538 |
|
$ |
550 |
|
$ |
594 |
|
$ |
633 |
|
$ |
525 |
|
Non-interest Income |
|
489 |
|
542 |
|
498 |
|
526 |
|
396 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,027 |
|
$ |
1,092 |
|
$ |
1,092 |
|
$ |
1,159 |
|
$ |
921 |
|
Strong Net Interest Margin
(Percent)
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
TCF, 4.12% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
4.25 |
% |
4.00 |
% |
3.84 |
% |
3.66 |
% |
4.20 |
% |
Second Quarter |
|
4.22 |
|
4.02 |
|
4.00 |
|
3.80 |
|
4.18 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
4.11 |
|
3.90 |
|
3.97 |
|
3.92 |
|
4.12 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
4.07 |
|
3.83 |
|
3.84 |
|
4.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KBW Regional Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index Median, 3.73% 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
3.79 |
% |
3.66 |
% |
3.61 |
% |
3.49 |
% |
3.71 |
% |
Second Quarter |
|
3.84 |
|
3.69 |
|
3.64 |
|
3.57 |
|
3.73 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
3.81 |
|
3.68 |
|
3.64 |
|
3.64 |
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
3.70 |
|
3.69 |
|
3.65 |
|
3.68 |
|
|
|
Strong Mix of Fee Revenues 1
($ millions)
|
|
9/10 |
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Fees and Service Charges |
|
$ |
212 |
|
54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card Revenue |
|
83 |
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Finance |
|
69 |
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATM Revenue |
|
23 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
389 |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Year GAP Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 12/31/09 |
|
At 9/30/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset (Liability) Sensitive |
|
(6.6 |
)% |
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Twelve-month growth rate
1 Year-to-date
2 QTD June 30, 2010
6.) Capital Ratios
($ millions)
RECORD CAPITAL LEVELS!
|
|
12/06 |
|
12/07 |
|
12/08 |
|
12/09 |
|
9/10 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Tangible Realized Common Equity |
|
$ |
915 |
|
$ |
964 |
|
$ |
996 |
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
$ |
1,320 |
|
Tangible Realized Common Equity Ratio |
|
6.30 |
% |
6.09 |
% |
6.01 |
% |
5.86 |
% |
7.27 |
% 1 |
|||||
At September 30, 2010
· Other Capital Ratios
· Total equity to total assets 8.22%
· Total tier 1 common capital 9.45%2
· Total tier 1 risk-based capital 10.35%
· Total risk-based capital 12.73%
· Tangible realized common equality has increased six consecutive quarters
1 See Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures - Tangible Realized Common Equity slide
2 See Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures - Total Tier 1 Common Capital Ratio slide
7.) Non-Interest
Expense
($ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
||||||
|
|
3Q10 |
|
3Q09 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|||
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
$ |
90.3 |
|
$ |
90.7 |
|
$ |
(.4 |
) |
(.4 |
)% |
|
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
32.1 |
|
31.6 |
|
.5 |
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|||
FDIC premiums |
|
5.5 |
|
5.1 |
|
.4 |
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|||
Advertising and marketing |
|
3.4 |
|
4.8 |
|
(1.4 |
) |
(29.6 |
) |
|
|
|||
Deposit account premiums |
|
3.3 |
|
7.5 |
|
(4.2 |
) |
(55.3 |
) |
|
|
|||
Other |
|
39.4 |
|
34.7 |
|
4.7 |
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
|||
Core operating expenses |
|
174.0 |
|
174.4 |
|
(.4 |
) 1 |
(.2 |
) 1 |
|
|
|||
Operating lease depreciation |
|
9.0 |
|
3.7 |
|
5.3 |
|
140.1 |
|
|
|
|||
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets, net |
|
9.6 |
|
8.5 |
|
1.1 |
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
|||
Other credit costs, net |
|
(.8 |
) |
3.7 |
|
(4.5 |
) |
N.M. |
|
|
|
|||
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
191.8 |
|
$ |
190.3 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
.8 |
% |
|
|
1 Reduction is net of a $3.8 million increase in core operating expenses due to continued expansion of TCF Inventory Finance.
N.M. - Not meaningful
8.) Strong
Deposit Franchise
Quarterly Average Balances
($ millions)
|
|
12/06 |
|
12/07 |
|
12/08 |
|
12/09 |
|
9/10 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Checking |
|
$ |
4,141 |
|
$ |
3,981 |
|
$ |
3,914 |
|
$ |
4,116 |
|
$ |
4,342 |
|
Savings |
|
2,321 |
|
2,596 |
|
2,861 |
|
5,231 |
|
5,447 |
|
|||||
Money Market |
|
594 |
|
598 |
|
625 |
|
672 |
|
654 |
|
|||||
Certificates of Deposit |
|
2,471 |
|
2,307 |
|
2,449 |
|
1,367 |
|
1,006 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
9,527 |
|
$ |
9,482 |
|
$ |
9,849 |
|
$ |
11,386 |
|
$ |
11,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Average Rate 1: |
|
2.33 |
% |
2.29 |
% |
1.51 |
% |
.74 |
% |
.48 |
% |
1 Quarter-to-date (annualized)
9.) Deposit Strategies
· Earn a significant portion of our profits from the deposit side of the bank
· Emphasize great retail branch locations in densely populated suburban/metro markets
· Accumulate a large number of low-cost core accounts by offering convenient, competitive and diversified products and services
· Low-cost checking accounts are the anchor account used to build additional customer relationships
· Convenience oriented - open longer hours, 7 days a week
10.) Significant Liquidity & Borrowing Capacity
At September 30, 2010
· TCF has unused, secured borrowing capacity from the following sources:
· Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines - $2 billion
· Federal Reserve Discount Window - $529 million
· Balance of $109.6 million at the Federal Reserve (asset liquidity)
11.) Banking
Fees & Other Revenue 1
($ millions)
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
First Quarter |
|
$ |
92 |
|
$ |
94 |
|
$ |
96 |
|
$ |
90 |
|
$ |
100 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
104 |
|
106 |
|
103 |
|
112 |
|
115 |
|
|||||
Third Quarter |
|
105 |
|
107 |
|
107 |
|
111 |
|
103 |
|
|||||
Fourth Quarter |
|
99 |
|
106 |
|
100 |
|
109 |
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
400 |
|
$ |
413 |
|
$ |
406 |
|
$ |
422 |
|
$ |
318 |
|
1 Consisting of fees and service charges, card revenue and ATM revenue
12.) Card
Revenue +5%*
($ millions)
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
First Quarter |
|
$ |
21 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
25 |
|
$ |
25 |
|
$ |
27 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
23 |
|
25 |
|
27 |
|
27 |
|
29 |
|
|||||
Third Quarter |
|
24 |
|
26 |
|
26 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
|||||
Fourth Quarter |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
25 |
|
27 |
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
92 |
|
$ |
99 |
|
$ |
103 |
|
$ |
105 |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sales Volume: |
|
$ |
6,465 |
|
$ |
6,949 |
|
$ |
7,280 |
|
$ |
7,308 |
|
$ |
5,721 |
1 |
Average Interchange Rate: |
|
1.36 |
% |
1.35 |
% |
1.34 |
% |
1.34 |
% |
1.38 |
%1 |
At September 30, 2010
· 11th largest issuer of Visa Classic debit cards
· 12th largest issuer of Visa Commercial debit cards
· $5.7 billion in sales volume, up 5.5% 1
· 21.9 transactions per month on active cards, up 6.3% 1
· Interchange fees paid by merchants
* Twelve-month growth rate
1 Year-to-date
13.) Durbin Amendment Lawsuit
· On October 12, 2010, TCF filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Durbin Amendment of the Dodd-Frank Act
· Amendment orders Federal Reserve to enact regulations that strictly limit the amount of interchange fees banks can charge retailers on debit card transactions
· TCFs current average interchange rate is 1.38%
· Federal Reserve to set rate based only on incremental processing fees and specifically excludes other costs
· Challenge of constitutionality:
· Due Process - price cap prevents TCF from earning a fair rate of return on its invested capital
· Equal Protection - only applies to banks with $10 billion or more in total assets; 99% of all U.S. banks and 48% of U.S. branches are exempt
· Takings Clause - taking of TCF property without just compensation
14.) Stable Loan Growth
($ millions)
|
|
Diverse Products and Geographies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
12/06 |
|
12/07 |
|
12/08 |
|
12/09 |
|
9/10 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Consumer Lending |
|
$ |
6,717 |
|
$ |
7,274 |
|
$ |
7,364 |
|
$ |
7,332 |
|
$ |
7,280 |
|
|
Commercial Lending |
|
2,943 |
|
3,116 |
|
3,491 |
|
3,719 |
|
3,663 |
|
||||||
Leasing and Equipment Finance |
|
1,818 |
|
2,104 |
|
2,486 |
|
3,071 |
|
3,158 |
|
||||||
Inventory Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
469 |
|
796 |
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
11,478 |
|
$ |
12,494 |
|
$ |
13,346 |
|
$ |
14,591 |
|
$ |
14,897 |
|
|
15.) Commercial Lending
($ millions)
|
|
Secured Lending Philosophy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
12/06 |
|
12/07 |
|
12/08 |
|
12/09 |
|
9/10 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Commercial Real Estate |
|
$ |
2,391 |
|
$ |
2,558 |
|
$ |
2,984 |
|
$ |
3,269 |
|
$ |
3,323 |
|
|
Commercial Business |
|
552 |
|
558 |
|
507 |
|
450 |
|
340 |
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
2,943 |
|
$ |
3,116 |
|
$ |
3,491 |
|
$ |
3,719 |
|
$ |
3,663 |
|
|
At September 30, 2010
· Commercial real estate $3.3 billion
· 26% retail services
· 20% apartment loans
· 19% office buildings
· 14% industrial buildings
· 7% hotels and motels
· 2% residential home builders
· Commercial business $340 million
· Commercial highlights
· 5.58% average yield
· 86% fixed rate, 14% variable rate
· Over 60-day delinquency rate .04% 1
· Net charge-offs: |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.07% 2 |
|
1.24% |
|
.54% |
|
|
|
· Approximately 99% of all commercial loans secured
· CRE location mix: 93% TCF Banking Markets, 7% Other
· Michigan exposure is $778 million, down 8.4% from September 30, 2009
1 Excludes non-accrual loans
2 Annualized
16.) Leasing & Equipment Finance 1
($ millions)
|
|
Growth Opportunities Still Exist |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
12/06 |
|
12/07 |
|
12/08 |
|
12/09 |
|
9/10 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Leasing and Equipment Finance |
|
$ |
1,899 |
|
$ |
2,175 |
|
$ |
2,545 |
|
$ |
3,177 |
|
$ |
3,240 |
|
|
At September 30, 2010
· 13th largest bank-affiliated leasing company and 29th largest equipment finance/leasing company in the U.S.
· Diverse equipment types
· 19% specialty vehicles, 19% manufacturing, 14% medical, 11% construction
· 6.50% average yield
· Over 60-day delinquency rate .17% 2
· Delinquencies have decreased five consecutive quarters
· Non-accrual loans and leases have decreased two consecutive quarters
· Net charge-offs: |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.01% 3 |
|
.97% |
|
.50% |
|
|
|
· Uninstalled backlog of $359.7 million
· Unguaranteed residuals of only $109.4 million, or 3.5% of loans and leases
1 Includes operating leases ($82.2 million at September 30, 2010)
2 Excludes non-accrual loans and leases and acquired portfolios
3 Annualized
17.) TCF Inventory Finance
($ millions)
|
|
Experienced and Seasoned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
9/09 |
|
12/09 |
|
3/10 |
|
6/10 |
|
9/10 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Electronics & Appliances |
|
$ |
128.4 |
|
$ |
122.3 |
|
$ |
119.6 |
|
$ |
122.4 |
|
$ |
120.1 |
|
Lawn & Garden |
|
96.4 |
|
346.5 |
|
580.8 |
|
521.8 |
|
462.9 |
|
|||||
Power Sports |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169.8 |
|
|||||
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
224.8 |
|
$ |
468.8 |
|
$ |
700.4 |
|
$ |
644.2 |
|
$ |
795.6 |
|
At September 30, 2010
· Inventory floorplan finance business with a focus on lawn and garden products, consumer electronics, household appliances and power sports
· Operates in the U.S. and Canada
· 229 employees
· 100% variable rate receivables
· Average yield 7.45%
|
· |
Net charge-offs: |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.12% 1 |
|
.10% |
|
|
|
· Credit support from equipment manufacturers
· Credit risk spread across 8,846 active dealers
1 Annualized
18.) TCF Inventory Finance Opportunities
· Continued growth through recent acquisitions:
· August 2010 - Assumed Arctic Cat Canadian floorplan financing program
· August 2010 - Assumed E-Z-GO floorplan financing program
· August 2009 - Created Red Iron Acceptance LLC, a joint venture with The Toro Company
19.) Wholesale Banking 1 Credit Quality
Quarter-to-Date
($ millions)
|
|
12/09 |
|
3/10 |
|
6/10 |
|
9/10 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net charge-offs 2: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Commercial |
|
.79 |
% |
.85 |
% |
.98 |
% |
1.40 |
% |
||||
Specialty finance |
|
.91 |
% |
.79 |
% |
.82 |
% |
.96 |
% |
||||
Total wholesale banking |
|
.84 |
% |
.82 |
% |
.90 |
% |
1.18 |
% |
||||
Over 60-day delinquencies 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Commercial |
|
|
% |
|
% |
.22 |
% |
.04 |
% |
||||
Specialty finance |
|
.65 |
% |
.54 |
% |
.39 |
% |
.26 |
% |
||||
Total wholesale banking |
|
.32 |
% |
.27 |
% |
.31 |
% |
.15 |
% |
||||
Non-accrual loans and leases |
|
$ |
157.0 |
|
$ |
157.4 |
|
$ |
179.1 |
|
$ |
203.2 |
|
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets |
|
$ |
56.0 |
|
$ |
51.7 |
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
$ |
60.1 |
|
1 Includes commercial banking and specialty finance
2 Annualized
3 Excludes non-accrual loans and leases
20.) Classified Wholesale Loans & Leases 1
($ millions)
|
|
9/09 |
|
12/09 |
|
3/10 |
|
6/10 |
|
9/10 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Classified Wholesale Loans and Leases |
|
$ |
329 |
|
$ |
370 |
|
$ |
435 |
|
$ |
439 |
|
$ |
429 |
|
At September 30, 2010
· By type
· Commercial real estate $354.3 million
· Up 22.7% from December 31, 2009
· Commercial business $29.8 million
· Down 29.9% from December 31, 2009
· Leasing and equipment finance $38.1 million
· Down 2.4% from December 31, 2009
· Inventory finance $6.5 million
· Over 60-day delinquency rate 1.29% 2, down from 2.15% 2 at June 30, 2010
1 See Source References & Footnotes slide for a detailed description of classified wholesale loans and leases
2 As a percent of classified wholesale loans and leases
21.) Consumer Real Estate
($ millions)
|
|
12/06 |
|
12/07 |
|
12/08 |
|
12/09 |
|
9/10 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
First Mortgages |
|
$ |
4,409 |
|
$ |
4,707 |
|
$ |
4,882 |
|
$ |
4,962 |
|
$ |
4,952 |
|
Junior Liens |
|
2,101 |
|
2,344 |
|
2,420 |
|
2,319 |
|
2,285 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
6,510 |
|
$ |
7,051 |
|
$ |
7,302 |
|
$ |
7,281 |
|
$ |
7,237 |
|
At September 30, 2010
· 74% first lien positions, average loan amount of $123,499
· 26% junior lien positions, average loan amount of $40,747
· 68% fixed rate, 32% variable rate
· $2 billion, or 89%, of variable-rate consumer real estate loans were at their contractual interest rate floor at October 1, 2010
· Average home value of $254,056 1
· 5.99% average yield
· Over 60-day delinquency rate 1.43% 2
· |
Net charge-offs: |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
1.72%3 |
|
1.46% |
|
.86% |
|
· Average FICO score of the retail lending operation at origination 726
· Average updated FICO score of the retail lending operation 725
· Michigan exposure is $1.1 billion
· $2.2 billion of loans originated since January 1, 2008 with 2010 net charge-offs of .41%3
1 Based on value at origination
2 Excludes non-accrual loans
3 Annualized
22.) Consumer Real Estate Credit Quality
Quarter-to-Date
($ millions)
|
|
12/09 |
|
3/10 |
|
6/10 |
|
9/10 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net charge-offs 1: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
First mortgage lien |
|
1.34 |
% |
1.32 |
% |
1.36 |
% |
1.63 |
% |
||||
Junior lien |
|
2.54 |
% |
2.25 |
% |
2.20 |
% |
2.50 |
% |
||||
Total |
|
1.73 |
% |
1.61 |
% |
1.63 |
% |
1.91 |
% |
||||
Over 60-day delinquencies2 |
|
1.16 |
% |
1.45 |
% |
1.51 |
% |
1.43 |
% |
||||
Non-accrual loans |
|
$ |
139.2 |
|
$ |
147.9 |
|
$ |
151.0 |
|
$ |
166.5 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
$ |
67.0 |
|
$ |
65.3 |
|
$ |
81.9 |
|
$ |
88.3 |
|
Accruing restructured loans |
|
$ |
252.5 |
|
$ |
285.6 |
|
$ |
297.1 |
|
$ |
315.6 |
|
1 Annualized
2 Excludes non-accrual loans
23.) Restructured Consumer Real Estate Loans
· Loans modified to assist customers with their financial hardship by lowering their monthly loan payments for up to 18 months
· In the third quarter of 2010, modified $28.7 million of consumer real estate loans that are considered restructured loans and continue to accrue interest
· Reserved for based on present value of expected cash flows - $34 million, or 10.8% at September 30, 2010
· The over 60-day delinquency rate was 5.5% at September 30, 2010
· TCFs current modification program started in August 2009 and represents 80.1% of the September 30, 2010 balance of accruing restructured loans
24.) Home Price Trends
|
|
S&P/Case-Shiller® Home Price Index1 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
July |
|
July |
|
July |
|
July |
|
Last Year |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minneapolis |
|
163.6 |
|
141.9 |
|
117.9 |
|
125.3 |
|
6.3 |
% |
Chicago |
|
165.3 |
|
148.6 |
|
127.4 |
|
125.1 |
|
(1.7 |
) |
Detroit |
|
111.4 |
|
92.7 |
|
69.8 |
|
70.7 |
|
1.3 |
|
Denver |
|
137.2 |
|
130.5 |
|
126.6 |
|
126.5 |
|
(.1 |
) |
Phoenix |
|
209.7 |
|
148.4 |
|
106.2 |
|
109.8 |
|
3.4 |
|
1 The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices track the price path of typical single-family homes located in various metropolitan areas. Each index combines matched price pairs for thousands of individual houses from the available universe of arms-length sales data. The indices have a base value of 100 in January 2000; thus, for example, a current index value of 150 translates to a 50% appreciation rate since January 2000 for a typical home located in the given market. Data is seasonally adjusted. Source: Standard & Poors
25.) Loan & Lease Geographic Diversification
($000s)
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Consumer |
|
Real Estate |
|
Leasing and |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Real Estate |
|
and Commercial |
|
Equipment |
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|||||
At Sept. 30, 2010: |
|
and Other |
|
Business |
|
Finance |
|
Finance |
|
Total |
|
|||||
Minnesota |
|
$ |
2,845,194 |
|
$ |
890,673 |
|
$ |
80,255 |
|
$ |
14,444 |
|
$ |
3,830,566 |
|
Illinois |
|
2,202,807 |
|
910,979 |
|
107,828 |
|
25,297 |
|
3,246,911 |
|
|||||
Michigan |
|
1,072,748 |
|
777,694 |
|
113,759 |
|
25,061 |
|
1,989,262 |
|
|||||
Wisconsin |
|
484,230 |
|
562,196 |
|
54,737 |
|
23,138 |
|
1,124,301 |
|
|||||
Colorado |
|
563,349 |
|
134,180 |
|
47,321 |
|
5,387 |
|
750,237 |
|
|||||
California |
|
2,928 |
|
18,284 |
|
404,234 |
|
19,346 |
|
444,792 |
|
|||||
Texas |
|
1,802 |
|
2,782 |
|
252,850 |
|
37,631 |
|
295,065 |
|
|||||
Florida |
|
3,706 |
|
58,475 |
|
183,748 |
|
34,090 |
|
280,019 |
|
|||||
Ohio |
|
3,461 |
|
53,740 |
|
128,457 |
|
33,314 |
|
218,972 |
|
|||||
New York |
|
3,555 |
|
3,881 |
|
173,411 |
|
28,603 |
|
209,450 |
|
|||||
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
4,263 |
|
191,439 |
|
195,702 |
|
|||||
Indiana |
|
24,362 |
|
68,005 |
|
60,658 |
|
21,249 |
|
174,274 |
|
|||||
Arizona |
|
54,426 |
|
36,165 |
|
71,885 |
|
6,892 |
|
169,368 |
|
|||||
Other |
|
17,886 |
|
145,999 |
|
1,474,066 |
|
329,731 |
|
1,967,682 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
7,280,454 |
|
$ |
3,663,053 |
|
$ |
3,157,472 |
|
$ |
795,622 |
|
$ |
14,896,601 |
|
26.) Allowance for Loans and Leases
($ millions)
|
|
12/06 |
|
12/07 |
|
12/08 |
|
12/09 |
|
9/10 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Allowance for Loan & Lease Losses |
|
$ |
58.5 |
|
$ |
80.9 |
|
$ |
172.4 |
|
$ |
244.5 |
|
$ |
253.1 |
|
Net Charge-offs |
|
.16 |
% |
.29 |
% |
.78 |
% |
1.34 |
% |
1.37 |
% 1 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Allowance as a % of |
|
.51 |
% |
.65 |
% |
1.29 |
% |
1.68 |
% |
1.70 |
% |
|||||
Coverage ratio: |
|
3.3 |
X |
2.3 |
X |
1.7 |
X |
1.3 |
X |
1.3 |
X 1 |
|||||
1 Annualized
27.) Credit Trends
(Percent)
|
|
12/08 |
|
3/09 |
|
6/09 |
|
9/09 |
|
12/09 |
|
3/10 |
|
6/10 |
|
9/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-offs 1 |
|
1.02 |
% |
1.04 |
% |
1.43 |
% |
1.52 |
% |
1.35 |
% |
1.22 |
% |
1.30 |
% |
1.58 |
% |
Over 60-day Delinquencies 2 |
|
.60 |
% |
.60 |
% |
.72 |
% |
.81 |
% |
.69 |
% |
.82 |
% |
.87 |
% |
.78 |
% |
1 Annualized
2 Excludes acquired portfolios
28.) Non-Performing Assets
($ millions)
|
|
9/09 |
|
12/09 |
|
3/10 |
|
6/10 |
|
9/10 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-accrual Loans & Leases |
|
$ |
268.8 |
|
$ |
296.3 |
|
$ |
305.4 |
|
$ |
330.2 |
|
$ |
369.8 |
|
Properties in Foreclosure |
|
41.5 |
|
59.4 |
|
56.9 |
|
64.4 |
|
76.0 |
|
|||||
Properties Owned |
|
52.7 |
|
46.3 |
|
44.5 |
|
53.5 |
|
60.2 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
363.0 |
|
$ |
402.0 |
|
$ |
406.8 |
|
$ |
448.1 |
|
$ |
506.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Residential properties owned |
|
298 |
|
298 |
|
350 |
|
410 |
|
480 |
|
29). Net Charge-offs 1 vs.
Other Banks
(Percent)
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCF |
|
.16 |
% |
.29 |
% |
.78 |
% |
1.34 |
% |
1.37 |
% |
Bank of America |
|
.68 |
|
.81 |
|
1.72 |
|
3.42 |
|
3.66 |
|
US Bancorp |
|
.38 |
|
.52 |
|
1.07 |
|
2.02 |
|
2.20 |
|
Wells Fargo |
|
.64 |
|
.93 |
|
1.84 |
|
2.10 |
|
2.28 |
|
JPMorgan Chase |
|
.67 |
|
.95 |
|
1.67 |
|
3.36 |
|
3.50 |
|
Fifth Third |
|
.43 |
|
.59 |
|
3.16 |
|
3.10 |
|
3.32 |
|
PNC |
|
.27 |
|
.31 |
|
.72 |
|
1.60 |
|
1.81 |
|
1 As a percent of average loans & leases
2 YTD as of September 30, 2010 (annualized)
30.) Non-Accrual Loans & Leases
($ millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment |
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Consumer |
|
Commercial |
|
Finance |
|
Finance |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
151.1 |
|
$ |
129.3 |
|
$ |
48.8 |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
330.2 |
|
Additions |
|
70.2 |
|
62.4 |
|
10.1 |
|
1.2 |
|
143.9 |
|
|||||
Charge-offs |
|
(15.1 |
) |
(13.1 |
) |
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(36.0 |
) |
|||||
Transfers to other assets |
|
(21.7 |
) |
(13.8 |
) |
(3.9 |
) |
(.1 |
) |
(39.5 |
) |
|||||
Return to accrual status |
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
(.3 |
) |
(.8 |
) |
(15.8 |
) |
|||||
Payments received |
|
(2.6 |
) |
(6.2 |
) |
(6.5 |
) |
(.4 |
) |
(15.7 |
) |
|||||
Other, net |
|
(.6 |
) |
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
166.6 |
|
$ |
161.9 |
|
$ |
40.4 |
|
$ |
.9 |
|
$ |
369.8 |
|
Net change |
|
$ |
15.5 |
|
$ |
32.6 |
|
$ |
(8.4 |
) |
$ |
(.1 |
) |
$ |
39.6 |
|
31.) Summary of Non-Accrual Loans
($ millions)
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs and |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Contractual |
|
Allowance |
|
Net |
|
|
|
|||
At Sept. 30, 2010: |
|
Balance |
|
Recorded |
|
Exposure |
|
Impairment 1 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Consumer |
|
$ |
208.4 |
|
$ |
43.1 |
|
$ |
165.3 |
|
20.7% |
|
Commercial |
|
202.4 |
|
56.8 |
|
145.6 |
|
28.1 |
|
|||
Leasing and equipment finance |
|
40.5 |
|
11.6 |
|
28.9 |
|
28.6 |
|
|||
Inventory finance |
|
.8 |
|
.2 |
|
.6 |
|
19.5 |
|
|||
Total |
|
$ |
452.1 |
|
$ |
111.7 |
|
$ |
340.4 |
|
24.7 |
|
1 Represents the ratio of charge-offs and allowance recorded to the contractual loan balances prior to non-accrual status
32.) Summary of Real Estate Owned
($ millions)
|
|
Contractual Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Balance Prior to |
|
Charge-offs and |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Non-performing |
|
Writedowns |
|
Other Real Estate |
|
|
|
|||
At Sept. 30, 2010: |
|
Status |
|
Recorded |
|
Owned Balance |
|
Impairment 1 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Consumer |
|
$ |
120.2 |
|
$ |
31.9 |
|
$ |
88.3 |
|
26.5% |
|
Commercial |
|
76.9 |
|
29.1 |
|
47.8 |
|
37.8 |
|
|||
Total |
|
$ |
197.1 |
|
$ |
61.0 |
|
$ |
136.1 |
|
30.9 |
|
1 Represents the ratio of charge-offs and writedowns recorded to the contractual loan balances prior to non-performing status
33.) Real Estate Owned
($ millions)
|
|
Consumer |
|
Commercial |
|
Total |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
81.9 |
|
$ |
36.0 |
|
$ |
117.9 |
|
Transferred in |
|
27.7 |
|
13.8 |
|
41.5 |
|
|||
Sales |
|
(17.4 |
) |
(1.3 |
) |
(18.7 |
) |
|||
Writedowns |
|
(3.2 |
) |
(.6 |
) |
(3.8 |
) |
|||
Other, net |
|
(.7 |
) |
(.1 |
) |
(.8 |
) |
|||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
88.3 |
|
$ |
47.8 |
|
$ |
136.1 |
|
Net change |
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
34.) Well-Positioned for Future Success
· Experienced and tenured management team
· New industry approach of portfolio lending funded with retail deposits has been a part of TCFs business philosophy for many years
· New management structure (Wholesale, Retail and Treasury & Support Services) improves execution, reduces overhead and increases our ability to quickly react to changes and new opportunities
· Strong wholesale banking management team will enable profitable growth
· Core profitability is still very high when credit costs normalize
35.) Cautionary Statement
This presentation and other reports issued by the Company, including reports filed with the SEC, contain forward-looking statements that deal with future results, plans or performance. In addition, TCFs management may make such statements orally to the media, or to securities analysts, investors or others. Forward-looking statements deal with matters that do not relate strictly to historical facts. TCFs future results may differ materially from historical performance and forward-looking statements about TCFs expected financial results or other plans and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. These include, but are not limited to the following:
* Adverse Economic or Business Conditions, Credit and
Other Risks. Continued or deepening
deterioration in general economic and banking industry conditions, or continued
increases in unemployment in TCFs primary banking markets; adverse economic,
business and competitive developments such as shrinking interest margins, deposit
outflows, deposit account attrition, or an inability to increase the number of
deposit accounts; adverse changes in credit and other risks posed by TCFs
loan, lease, investment, and securities available for sale portfolios,
including continuing declines in commercial or residential real estate values
or changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses dictated by new market
conditions or regulatory requirements; interest rate risks resulting from
fluctuations in prevailing interest rates or other factors that result in a
mismatch between yields earned on TCFs interest-earning assets and the rates
paid on its deposits and borrowings; foreign currency exchange risks.
* Earnings/Capital Constraints, Liquidity Risks. Limitations on TCFs ability to pay dividends
or to increase dividends in the future because of financial performance
deterioration, regulatory restrictions or limitations; increased deposit
insurance premiums, special assessments or other costs related to deteriorating
conditions in the banking industry, the
economic impact on banks of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act of 2010 (the Act) and Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of
2008, as amended (EESA), and other regulatory reform legislation; the impact
of financial regulatory reform, including the phase out of trust preferred
securities in Tier 1 capital called for by the Act, or additional capital,
leverage, liquidity and risk management requirements or changes in the
composition of qualifying regulatory capital; adverse changes in securities
markets directly or indirectly affecting TCFs ability to sell assets or to
fund its operations; diminished unsecured borrowing capacity resulting from TCF
credit rating downgrades and unfavorable conditions in the credit markets that
restrict or limit various funding sources; costs associated with new regulatory
requirements or interpretive guidance relating to liquidity.
* Legislative and Regulatory Requirements. New consumer protection and supervisory requirements, including the Acts creation of a new consumer protection bureau and limits on Federal preemption for state laws that could be applied to national banks; the imposition of requirements with an adverse impact relating to TCFs lending, loan collection and other business activities as a result of the EESA and the Act, or other legislative or regulatory developments such as mortgage foreclosure moratorium laws or imposition of underwriting or other limitations that impact the ability to use certain variable-rate products; reduction of interchange revenue from debit card transactions resulting from the so-called Durbin Amendment (the Amendment) to the Act, which limits debit card interchange fees to amounts that will only allow issuers to recover incremental costs of authorization, clearance and settlement of (continued)
36.) Cautionary Statement (continued)
debit card transactions, plus possibly some costs relating
to fraud prevention; impact of legislative, regulatory or other changes
affecting customer account charges and fee income; changes to bankruptcy laws
which would result in the loss of all or part of TCFs security interest due to
collateral value declines (so-called cramdown provisions); any material
failure of TCF to comply with the terms of its Consent Order with the Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency relating to TCFs Bank Secrecy Act compliance,
which may result in regulatory enforcement action including monetary penalties;
increased health care costs resulting from recently enacted Federal health care
reform legislation; adverse regulatory examinations and resulting enforcement
actions or other adverse consequences such as incremental capital requirements
or higher deposit insurance assessments; heightened regulatory practices,
requirements or expectations, including, but not limited to, requirements
related to the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering compliance activity.
* Risks Relating to New Product Introduction. TCF has introduced a new anchor retail
deposit account product that replaces TCF Totally Free Checking, and that calls
for a monthly maintenance fee on accounts not meeting certain specific
requirements. TCF has also implemented new regulatory requirements that
prohibit financial institutions from charging NSF fees on point-of-sale and ATM
transactions unless customers opt-in.
Customer acceptance of the new product changes and regulatory
requirements cannot be predicted with certainty, and these changes may have an
adverse impact on TCFs ability to generate and retain accounts and on its fee
revenue.
* Litigation Risks. Results of litigation, including class action
litigation concerning TCFs lending or deposit activities including account
servicing processes or fees or charges, or employment practices, and possible
increases in indemnification obligations for certain litigation against Visa
U.S.A. (covered litigation) and potential reductions in card revenues
resulting from covered litigation or other litigation against Visa.
* Competitive Conditions; Supermarket Branching Risk. Reduced demand for financial services and
loan and lease products; adverse developments affecting TCFs supermarket
banking relationships or any of the supermarket chains in which TCF maintains
supermarket branches.
* Accounting, Audit, Tax and Insurance Matters. Changes in accounting standards or
interpretations of existing standards; monetary, fiscal or tax policies of the
federal or state governments, including adoption of state legislation that
would increase state taxes; adverse state or Federal tax assessments or
findings in tax audits; lack of or inadequate insurance coverage for claims
against TCF.
* Technological and Operational Matters. Technological, computer-related or
operational difficulties or loss or theft of information and the possibility
that deposit account losses (fraudulent checks, etc.) may increase.
Investors should consult TCFs Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K for additional important information about the Company.
37.) Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures - Tangible Realized Common
Equity1
($000s)
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
||
Computation of total equity to total assets: |
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
1,505,962 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
18,313,608 |
|
Total equity to total assets |
|
8.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computation of tangible realized common equity to tangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
$ |
1,505,962 |
|
Less: Non-controlling interest in subsidiaries |
|
10,007 |
|
|
Total TCF stockholders equity |
|
1,495,955 |
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
22,458 |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
152,599 |
|
|
Other intangibles |
|
1,275 |
|
|
Tangible realized common equity |
|
$ |
1,319,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
18,313,608 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
152,599 |
|
|
Other intangibles |
|
1,275 |
|
|
Tangible assets |
|
$ |
18,159,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible realized common equity to tangible assets |
|
7.27 |
% |
1 In contrast to GAAP-basis measures, tangible realized common equity excludes the effect of goodwill, other intangibles and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Management reviews tangible realized common equity as an ongoing measure and has included this information because of current interest in the industry. The methodology for calculating tangible realized common equity may vary between companies.
38.) Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures - Total Tier 1 Common Capital
Ratio1
($000s)
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
||
Total Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio |
|
|
|
|
Total tier 1 capital |
|
$ |
1,447,070 |
|
Total risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
13,984,181 |
|
Total tier 1 risk-based capital ratio |
|
10.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computation of tier 1 common capital ratio: |
|
|
|
|
Total tier 1 capital |
|
$ |
1,447,070 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
Qualifying trust preferred securities |
|
115,000 |
|
|
Qualifying non-controlling interest in subsidiaries |
|
10,007 |
|
|
Total tier 1 common capital |
|
$ |
1,322,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
13,984,181 |
|
Total tier 1 common capital ratio |
|
9.45 |
% |
1 In contrast to GAAP-basis measures, the total tier 1 common capital ratio excludes the effect of qualifying trust preferred securities and qualifying non-controlling interest in subsidiaries. Management reviews the total tier 1 common capital ratio as an ongoing measure and has included this information because of current interest in the industry. The methodology for calculating total tier 1 common capital may vary between companies.
39.) Source References & Footnotes
Slide: Corporate Profile
36th largest U.S. bank - Ipreo; 6/30/10
23th largest branch network - SNL Financial, LC; 3Q10
5th largest in campus card relationships - CR80News; Spring 2010
11th largest issuer of Visa Classic - Visa; 2Q10; ranked by sales volume
12th largest issuer of Visa Commercial - Visa; 2Q10; ranked by sales volume
13th largest bank affiliated leasing company - The Monitor; 2010 Monitor 100
Slide: Diversified Revenue Base
KBW Regional Banking Index net interest margin data - KBW & SNL Financial LC; 6/30/10
Slide: Card Revenue
11th largest issuer of Visa Classic - Visa; 2Q10; ranked by sales volume
12th largest issuer of Visa Commercial - Visa; 2Q10; ranked by sales volume
Slide: Durbin Amendment Lawsuit
99% of all banks and 48% of branches are exempt - SNL Financial, LC; 6/30/10
Slide: Leasing and Equipment Finance
13th largest bank-affiliated leasing company - The Monitor; 2010 Monitor Bank 40
29th largest equipment finance/leasing company - The Monitor; 2010 Monitor 100
Slide: Classified Wholesale Loans & Leases
Classified wholesale loans and leases excludes non-accrual loans and leases, over 90-day delinquent loans and leases, real estate owned, and repossessed assets and includes commercial loans and leases primarily classified for regulatory purposes as substandard and reflect the distinct possibility, but not probability, that they will become non-performing or that TCF will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan or lease agreement
Slide: Home Price Trends
Home price data - S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index
Slide: Net Charge-offs vs. Other Banks
Net charge-off data - SNL Financial LC; 9/30/10