ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.1 - CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13(A)-14(A) - ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP	exhibit31-1.htm
EX-32.2 - CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION - ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP	exhibit32-2.htm
EX-31.2 - CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13(A)-14(A) - ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP	exhibit31-2.htm
EX-32.1 - CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION - ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP	exhibit32-1.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]		Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009.

[ ]		Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from ______ to ______

		Commission file number 001-15373

ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP

Incorporated in the State of Delaware
I.R.S. Employer Identification # 43-1706259
Address: 150 North Meramec
Clayton, MO 63105
Telephone: (314) 725-5500
_________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-7 (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files ). Yes [ ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer þ	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller
		reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act Yes [ ] No [X]

As of November 4, 2009, the Registrant had 12,833,777 shares of outstanding common stock.

This document is also available through our website at http://www.enterprisebank.com.

ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)		1

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)		2

Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)		3

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income (Unaudited)		3

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)		4

Notes to Consolidated Unaudited Financial Statements		5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	32

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	34

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6.	Exhibits	34

Signatures		35

Certifications		36

PART 1 – ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

	At September 30,			At December 31,
(In thousands, except share and per share data)	2009			2008
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	12,519		$	25,626
Federal funds sold		1,771			2,637
Interest-bearing deposits		82,651			14,384
Total cash and cash equivalents		96,941			42,647
Securities available for sale		197,521			96,431
Other investments, at cost		13,548			11,884
Loans held for sale		2,130			2,632
Portfolio loans		2,113,365			2,201,457
Less: Allowance for loan losses		45,019			33,808
Portfolio loans, net		2,068,346			2,167,649
Other real estate		19,273			13,868
Fixed assets, net		23,042			25,158
Accrued interest receivable		7,894			7,557
State tax credits, held for sale, including $36,569 and $39,142
carried at fair value, respectively		47,950			39,142
Goodwill		3,134			48,512
Intangibles, net		2,691			3,504
Other assets		36,155			34,783
Total assets	$	2,518,625		$	2,493,767

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Deposits:
Demand deposits	$	257,901		$	247,361
Interest-bearing transaction accounts		121,935			126,644
Money market accounts		626,775			702,886
Savings		8,832			7,826
Certificates of deposit:
$100k and over		488,334			520,197
Other		349,854			187,870
Total deposits		1,853,631			1,792,784
Subordinated debentures		85,081			85,081
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		139,001			119,957
Other borrowings		265,109			272,969
Accrued interest payable		2,403			2,473
Other liabilities		6,729			5,931
Total liabilities		2,351,954			2,279,195

Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value;
5,000,000 shares authorized;
35,000 shares issued and outstanding		31,631			31,116
Common stock, $0.01 par value;
30,000,000 shares authorized; 12,909,777 and
12,876,981 shares issued, respectively		129			129
Treasury stock, at cost; 76,000 shares		(1,743	)		(1,743	)
Additional paid in capital		116,536			115,112
Retained earnings		17,926			68,710
Accumulated other comprehensive income		2,192			1,248
Total shareholders' equity		166,671			214,572

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	2,518,625		$	2,493,767

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)	2009		2008			2009			2008
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	28,750	$	30,025		$	86,420		$	91,342
Interest on debt securities:
Taxable		1,421		1,248			3,738			3,536
Nontaxable		5		7			18			23
Interest on federal funds sold		2		21			4			200
Interest on interest-bearing deposits		33		9			67			51
Dividends on equity securities		105		145			233			417
Total interest income		30,316		31,455			90,480			95,569
Interest expense:
Interest-bearing transaction accounts		165		359			507			1,301
Money market accounts		1,535		3,165			4,558			11,288
Savings		9		11			27			47
Certificates of deposit:
$100 and over		3,837		4,757			12,217			13,137
Other		2,055		1,472			5,765			4,807
Subordinated debentures		1,267		805			3,928			2,551
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		1,250		1,759			3,568			5,288
Notes payable and other borrowings		2,813		2,543			8,176			7,624
Total interest expense		12,931		14,871			38,746			46,043
Net interest income		17,385		16,584			51,734			49,526
Provision for loan losses		6,480		3,007			32,012			10,214
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		10,905		13,577			19,722			39,312
Noninterest income:
Wealth Management revenue		2,010		2,640			7,530			7,905
Service charges on deposit accounts		1,247		1,102			3,791			3,241
Other service charges and fee income		242		245			714			746
Sale of branches/charter		-		2,840			-			3,400
Sale of other real estate		86		242			143			584
State tax credit activity, net		910		593			973			1,577
Sale of investment securities		-		-			952			73
Extinguishment of debt		5,326		-			5,326			-
Miscellaneous income (loss)		127		(22	)		231			95
Total noninterest income		9,948		7,640			19,660			17,621
Noninterest expense:
Employee compensation and benefits		7,417		7,792			21,762			23,706
Occupancy		1,291		1,100			3,719			3,160
Furniture and equipment		397		346			1,120			1,065
Data processing		548		562			1,594			1,647
Amortization of intangibles		264		348			813			1,102
Goodwill impairment charge		-		5,900			45,377			5,900
Loan legal and other real estate expense		1,098		171			3,520			670
Other		2,964		2,914			10,899			8,439
Total noninterest expense		13,979		19,133			88,804			45,689

Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)		6,874		2,084			(49,422	)		11,244
Income tax expense (benefit)		2,187		882			(2,321	)		4,055
Net income (loss)	$	4,687	$	1,202		$	(47,101	)	$	7,189

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	4,082	$	1,202		$	(48,907	)	$	7,189

Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic	$	0.32	$	0.09		$	(3.81	)	$	0.57
Diluted	$	0.31	$	0.09		$	(3.81	)	$	0.56

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

														Accumulated
														other			Total
	Preferred		Common		Treasury			Additional paid			Retained			comprehensive			shareholders'
(in thousands, except per share data)			Stock					in capital			earnings			income (loss)			equity
Balance December 31, 2008	$	31,116	$	129	$	(1,743	)	$	115,112		$	68,710		$	1,248		$	214,572
Net loss		-		-		-			-			(47,101	)		-			(47,101	)
Change in fair value of available for sale securities, net of tax		-		-		-			-			-			1,672			1,672
Reclassification adjustment for realized gain
on sale of securities included in net income, net of tax		-		-		-			-			-			(609	)		(609	)
Reclassification of cash flow hedge, net of tax		-		-		-			-			-			(119	)		(119	)
Total comprehensive loss																		(46,157	)
Cash dividends paid on common shares, $0.1575 per share		-		-		-			-			(2,021	)		-			(2,021	)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock		-		-		-			-			(1,147	)		-			(1,147	)
Preferred stock amortization of discount and issuance cost		515		-		-			(130	)		(515	)		-			(130	)
Issuance under equity compensation plans, net, 32,796 shares		-		-		-			362			-			-			362
Share-based compensation		-		-		-			1,529			-			-			1,529
Excess tax expense on additional share-based compensation
in connection with acquisition of Clayco Banc Corporation		-		-		-			(364	)		-			-			(364	)
Excess tax benefit related to equity compensation plans		-		-		-			27			-			-			27
Balance September 30, 2009	$	31,631	$	129	$	(1,743	)	$	116,536		$	17,926		$	2,192		$	166,671

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)

	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2009			2008		2009			2008
Net income (loss)	$	4,687		$	1,202	$	(47,101	)	$	7,189
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities
arising during the period, net of tax		1,181			228		1,672			212
Less reclassification adjustment for realized gain
on sale of securities included in net income, net of tax		-			-		(609	)		-
Reclassification of cash flow hedge, net of tax		(40	)		-		(119	)		(47	)
Total other comprehensive income		1,141			228		944			165
Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	5,828		$	1,430	$	(46,157	)	$	7,354

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

	Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(47,101	)	$	7,189
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash
from operating activities:
Depreciation		2,688			1,927
Provision for loan losses		32,012			10,214
Deferred income taxes		(2,692	)		(1,306	)
Net amortization of debt securities		740			351
Amortization of intangible assets		813			1,102
Gain on sale of investment securities		(952	)		(73	)
Mortgage loans originated		(72,098	)		(39,126	)
Proceeds from mortgage loans sold		72,080			42,096
Gain on sale of other real estate		(143	)		(584	)
Gain on state tax credits, net		(973	)		(1,577	)
Excess tax expense on additional share-based compensation from acquisition of Clayco		364			-
Excess tax benefits of share-based compensation		(27	)		(766	)
Share-based compensation		1,529			1,435
Gain on sale of branches/charter		-			(3,400	)
Goodwill impairment charge		45,377			5,900
Changes in:
Accrued interest receivable and income tax receivable		543			328
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		(414	)		(4,092	)
Other, net		3,047			(3,017	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		34,793			16,601

Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash paid in sale of branch/charter, net of cash and cash equivalents received		-			(20,736	)
Net decrease (increase) in loans		48,583			(360,537	)
Proceeds from the sale/maturity/redemption/recoveries of:
Debt and equity securities, available for sale		72,323			32,795
Other investments		-			14,514
State tax credits held for sale		3,349			1,668
Other real estate		11,750			5,669
Loans previously charged off		607			261
Payments for the purchase/origination of:
Available for sale debt and equity securities		(171,820	)		(66,364	)
Other investments		(1,896	)		(23,025	)
State tax credits held for sale		(11,752	)		(15,271	)
Fixed assets		(401	)		(6,480	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(49,257	)		(437,506	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in noninterest-bearing deposit accounts		10,540			(51,216	)
Net increase in interest-bearing deposit accounts		50,307			190,929
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debentures		-			2,500
Net proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances		19,044			70,025
Net proceeds from federal funds purchased		(19,400	)		36,600
Net increase in other borrowings		11,540			46,762
Net proceeds from notes payable		-			12,000
Cash dividends paid on common stock		(2,021	)		(1,991	)
Excess tax expense on additional share-based compensation from acquisition of Clayco		(364	)		-
Excess tax benefits of share-based compensation		27			766
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock		(1,147	)		-
Preferred stock issuance cost		(130	)		-
Proceeds from the exercise of common stock options		362			3,418
Net cash provided by financing activities		68,758			309,793
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		54,294			(111,112	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		42,647			153,649
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	96,941		$	42,537

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	38,816		$	40,382
Income taxes		360			7,456
Noncash transactions:
Transfer to other real estate owned in settlement of loans		22,378			14,420
Sales of other real estate financed		4,277			1,840

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Unaudited Financial Statements

NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The more significant accounting policies used by the Company in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are summarized below:

Basis of Financial Statement Presentation
Enterprise Financial Services Corp (the “Company” or “EFSC”) is a financial holding company that provides a full range of banking and wealth management services to individuals and corporate customers located in the St. Louis and Kansas City metropolitan markets through its banking subsidiary, Enterprise Bank & Trust (“Enterprise”). Enterprise also operates a loan production office in Phoenix, Arizona. In addition, the Company owns 100% of Millennium Brokerage Group, LLC (“Millennium”). Millennium is headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee and operates life insurance advisory and brokerage operations serving life agents, banks, CPA firms, property and casualty groups, and financial advisors in 49 states.

The consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. They do not include all information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, Enterprise and Millennium. Acquired businesses are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

The Company has evaluated all subsequent events through November 6, 2009 (the date the Company’s third quarter Form 10Q was issued).

Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the year ending December 31, 2009. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances to conform to the current year presentation.

Income Taxes
Historically, the Company has recorded its income tax provision or benefit in interim periods based on an estimated annual effective tax rate. However, when a reliable estimate of the annual effective tax rate cannot be made, the actual effective tax rate for the year-to-date period may be used. In the third quarter of 2009, the Company concluded that minor changes in the Company’s estimated 2009 pre-tax results and projected permanent items produced significant variability in the estimated annual effective tax rate, and thus, the estimated rate may not be reliable. Accordingly, the Company has determined that the actual effective tax rate for the year-to-date period is the best estimate of the effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for 2009 could differ significantly from the effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2009.

The actual effective tax rate differs from the expected effective tax rate primarily due to the nondeductible goodwill impairment charge and other permanent differences related to tax exempt interest and federal tax credits.

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets only to the extent that they are expected to be used to reduce amounts that have been paid or will be paid to tax authorities. Management believes, based on all positive and negative evidence, that the deferred tax asset is more likely-than-not-to be realized.

Loan Participations
During a review of loan participation agreements, the Company determined that certain of its loan participation agreements contained language inconsistent with sale accounting treatment. The agreements provided the Company with the unilateral ability to repurchase participated portions of loans at their outstanding loan balance plus accrued interest at any time. In effect, the repurchase right afforded the Company with effective control over the participated portion of the loan, which conflicts with sale accounting treatment. As a result, rather than accounting for loans participated to other banks as sales, the Company should have recorded the participated portion of the loans as portfolio loans, and should have recorded secured borrowings from the participating banks to finance such loans. Management reviewed the impact of this accounting treatment and concluded that the errors were immaterial to the previously reported amounts contained in its periodic reports. In order to correct the error, the Company recorded the participated portion of such loans as portfolio loans, along with a secured borrowing liability (included in Other borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets) to finance the loans. The Company also recorded incremental interest income on the loans offset by incremental interest expense on the secured borrowing. Additional provisions for loan losses and the related income tax effect were also recorded. The revision did not impact net cash provided by operating activities. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had $229.0 million of participated loans recorded in Portfolio loans and $229.0 million recorded in Other borrowings in the consolidated balance sheet.

The Company has corrected the error by revising the prior period consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2008, and the December 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet presented herein have been revised to correct for the error.

The effect of correcting these errors in the consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 is presented below.

	For the quarter ended				For the nine months ended
	September 30, 2008				September 30, 2008
(In thousands, except per share data)	As reported		As revised		As reported		As revised
Income Statement
Total interest income	$	29,289	$	31,455	$	88,818	$	95,569
Total interest expense		12,705		14,871		39,293		46,043
Provision for loan losses		2,825		3,007		8,350		10,214
Income tax expense		948		882		4,726		4,055
Net income		1,319		1,202		8,382		7,189
Net income available to common shareholders		1,319		1,202		8,382		7,189

Earnings per share:
Basic earnings per share		0.10		0.09		0.67		0.57
Diluted earnings per share		0.10		0.09		0.66		0.56

The effect of correcting these errors in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2008 is included in the following table (in thousands):

	As reported		As revised
Portfolio loans	$	1,977,175	$	2,201,457
Allowance for loan losses		31,309		33,808
Other assets		32,973		36,155
Total assets		2,270,174		2,493,767
Loan participations (included in Other Borrowings)		-		226,809
Total liabilities		2,052,386		2,279,195
Shareholders' equity		217,788		214,572

The effect of correcting these errors in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is presented below (in thousands):

	As reported			As revised
Net decrease (increase) in loans	$	(323,568	)	$	(360,537	)
Net increase in other borrowings		7,953			46,762

Under the terms of the agreements, the participating banks absorb credit losses, if any, on the participated portion of the loan. However, as secured borrowings on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, any reduction of the liability to the participating bank reflecting the participated bank’s portion of the credit loss is recorded only upon legal defeasance of such liability as a component of the gain or loss on extinguishment. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a $5.3 million pre-tax gain from the extinguishment of debt resulting from the foreclosure of the collateral on one of its participated loans.

In October 2009 the Company obtained amended agreements from substantially all of the participating banks that comply with sale accounting treatment. Upon amendment of each agreement, the Company will derecognize the participated loans, net of the allowance for losses, and the related liability from its consolidated balance sheet, and expects to recognize an additional gain from the extinguishment of debt of approximately $1.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2009.

NOTE 2—EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per common share data is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and the if-converted method for convertible securities related to the issuance of trust preferred securities. The following table presents a summary of per common share data and amounts for the periods indicated.

	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands, except per share data)	2009			2008		2009			2008
Net income (loss)	$	4,687		$	1,202	$	(47,101	)	$	7,189
Preferred stock dividend		(438	)		-		(1,313	)		-
Amortization of preferred stock discount		(167	)		-		(493	)		-
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders		4,082			1,202		(48,907	)		7,189

Impact of assumed conversions
Interest on 9% convertible trust preferred securities, net of income tax		371			-		-			-
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders and assumed conversions	$	4,453		$	1,202	$	(48,907	)	$	7,189

Weighted average common shares outstanding		12,834			12,664		12,832			12,550
Incremental shares from assumed conversions of
convertible trust preferred securities		1,439			-		-			-
Additional dilutive common stock equivalents		4			153		-			198
Diluted common shares outstanding		14,277			12,817		12,832			12,748

Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.32		$	0.09	$	(3.81	)	$	0.57
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.31		$	0.09	$	(3.81	)	$	0.56

For the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, there were 873,000 and 488,000 of weighted average common stock equivalents excluded from the per share calculations because their effect was anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, there were 2.3 million and 338,000 of weighted average common stock equivalents excluded from the per share calculation because their effect was anti-dilutive. In addition, at September 30, 2009, the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase 324,074 shares of common stock associated with the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program which were excluded from the per common share calculation because their effect was also anti-dilutive.

NOTE 3 – INVESTMENTS

The following table presents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of securities available-for-sale:

	September 30, 2009
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
(in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Available for sale securities:
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies	$	23,167	$	354	$	-		$	23,521
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored enterprises		37,604		125		-			37,729
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		569		12		-			581
Residential mortgage-backed securities		133,221		2,496		(27	)		135,690
	$	194,561	$	2,987	$	(27	)	$	197,521

	December 31, 2008
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
(in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Available for sale securities:
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	765	$	7	$	-		$	772
Residential mortgage-backed securities		94,368		1,438		(147	)		95,659
	$	95,133	$	1,445	$	(147	)	$	96,431

At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the government agencies and sponsored enterprises, in an amount greater than 10% of shareholders’ equity. Available for sale securities having a carrying value of $64.0 million and $73.0 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, were pledged as collateral to secure public deposits and for other purposes as required by law or contract provisions.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities classified as available for sale at September 30, 2009, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Amortized		Fair
(in thousands)	Cost		Value
Due in one year or less	$	21,818	$	21,906
Due from one to five years		38,055		38,424
Due from five to ten years		1,467		1,501
Due after ten years		-		-
Mortgage-backed securities		133,221		135,690
Total	$	194,561	$	197,521

The following table represents a summary of available-for-sale investment securities that had an unrealized loss:

	September 30, 2009
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Residential mortgage-backed securities	$	5,284	$	27	$	-	$	-	$	5,284	$	27

	December 31, 2008
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Residential mortgage-backed securities	$	21,709	$	144	$	628	$	3	$	22,337	$	147

The unrealized losses at both September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, were attributable to changes in market interest rates since the securities were purchased. Management systematically evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. This analysis requires management to consider various factors, which include (1) duration and magnitude of the decline in value, (2) the financial condition of the issuer or issuers, (3) structure of the security and (4) the intent to sell the security or whether its more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery in market value. At September 30, 2009, management performed its quarterly analysis of all securities with an unrealized loss and concluded no material individual securities were other-than-temporarily impaired.

The gross gains and gross losses realized from sales of available-for-sale for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 were as follows:

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2009		2008		2009		2008
Gross gains realized	$	-	$	-	$	952	$	138
Gross losses realized		-		-		-		65
Net gains realized	$	-	$	-	$	952	$	73

NOTE 4—GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill is tested for impairment annually and more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Historically the Banking reporting unit was tested for goodwill impairment at December 31 and the Millennium reporting unit has been tested for impairment at September 30.

At March 31, 2009, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $45.4 million which eliminated all goodwill at the Banking reporting unit. The impairment charge was primarily driven by the deterioration in the general economic environment and the resulting decline in the Company’s share price and market capitalization in the first quarter of 2009.

In 2008, goodwill impairment charges and customer related intangible charges of $8.7 million and $500,000, respectively, for Millennium were recorded.

The Millennium reporting unit was tested for impairment at September 30, 2009. The goodwill evaluation did not identify any impairment.

The table below summarizes the changes to goodwill for the periods presented.

	Reporting Unit
(in thousands)	Millennium		Banking			Total
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	3,134	$	45,378		$	48,512
Goodwill impairment related to Banking segment		-		(45,378	)		(45,378	)
Balance at September 30, 2009	$	3,134	$	-		$	3,134

The table below summarizes the changes to intangible asset balances. Customer and trade name intangibles are related to the Millennium reporting unit and Core deposit intangibles are related to the Banking reporting unit.

(in thousands)	Customer and Trade Name Intangibles			Core Deposit Intangible			Net Intangible
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	1,379		$	2,125		$	3,504
Amortization expense		(446	)		(367	)		(813	)
Balance at September 30, 2009	$	933		$	1,758		$	2,691

The following table reflects the expected amortization schedule for the customer, trade name and core deposit intangibles.

Year	Customer and Trade Name Intangibles		Core Deposit Intangible		Total Intangibles
Remaining 2009	$	150	$	115	$	265
2010		595		420		1,015
2011		13		358		371
2012		13		296		309
2013		13		234		247
After 2013		149		335		484
	$	933	$	1,758	$	2,691

NOTE 5—DISCLOSURES ABOUT FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company issues financial instruments with off balance sheet risk in the normal course of the business of meeting the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company’s extent of involvement and maximum potential exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for financial instruments included on its consolidated balance sheets. At September 30, 2009, no amounts have been accrued for any estimated losses for these financial instruments.

The contractual amount of off-balance-sheet financial instruments as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:

(in thousands)	September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
Commitments to extend credit	$	467,968	$	555,361
Standby letters of credit		32,103		33,875

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments usually have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Of the total commitments to extend credit at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, approximately $97.0 million and $131.0 million, respectively, represent fixed rate loan commitments. Since certain of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The bank evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by each bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, premises and equipment, and real estate.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by Enterprise to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These standby letters of credit are issued to support contractual obligations of the bank’s customers. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as the risk involved in extending loans to customers. The approximate remaining term of standby letters of credit range from 6 months to 5 years at September 30, 2009.

NOTE 6—DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

The Company is a party to various derivative financial instruments that are used in the normal course of business to meet the needs of its clients and as part of its risk management activities. These instruments include interest rate swaps and option contracts. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Interest rate swap contracts involve the exchange of fixed and floating rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying principal amounts. The Company enters into interest rate swap contracts on behalf of its clients and also utilizes such contracts to reduce or eliminate the exposure to changes in the cash flows or fair value of hedged assets or liabilities due to changes in interest rates. Interest rate option contracts consist of caps and provide for the transfer or reduction of interest rate risk in exchange for a fee.

All derivative financial instruments, whether designated as hedges or not, are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value within Other assets or Other liabilities. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative in the consolidated statement of operations depends on whether the contract has been designated as a hedge and qualifies for hedge accounting. At September 30, 2009, the Company did not have any derivatives designated as cash flow or fair value hedges.

Using derivative instruments means assuming counterparty credit risk. Counterparty credit risk relates to the loss we could incur if a counterparty were to default on a derivative contract. Notional amounts of derivative financial instruments do not represent credit risk, and are not recorded in the consolidated balance sheet. They are used merely to express the volume of this activity. We monitor the overall credit risk and exposure to individual counterparties. We do not anticipate nonperformance by any counterparties. The amount of counterparty credit exposure is the unrealized gains, if any, on such derivative contracts. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Enterprise had pledged cash of $1.5 million and $470,000, respectively, as collateral in connection with interest rate swap agreements.

Risk Management Instruments. The Company enters into certain derivative contracts to economically hedge state tax credits and certain loans.

Economic hedge of state tax credits. In November 2008, the Company entered into a series of interest rate caps in order to economically hedge changes in fair value of the State tax credits held for sale. The Company paid $2.1 million at inception of the contracts. See Note 8—Fair Value Measurements for further discussion of the fair value of the state tax credits.
Economic hedge of prime based loans. The Company had two interest rate swaps with notional values of $40.0 million each which economically hedged changes in cash flows of a pool of prime based loans. Those derivatives were terminated in February 2009, at which time the Company recognized a loss of $530,000 upon termination. The loss was included in Miscellaneous loss in the consolidated statement of operations. The derivatives had previously been designated as cash flow hedges. However, in December 2008, due to a variable rate differential, the Company concluded the cash flow hedges would not be prospectively effective and the hedges were dedesignated. The unrealized gain prior to dedesignation was included in Accumulated other comprehensive income and is being amortized over the expected life of the related loans. At September 30, 2009, the amount remaining in Accumulated other comprehensive income was $298,000. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, $62,000 and $186,000, respectively, were reclassified into Miscellaneous income. The Company expects to reclassify $248,000 of remaining derivative gains from Accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings over the next twelve months.

The table below summarizes the notional amounts and fair values of the derivative instruments used to manage risk.

					Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
	Notional Amount				Fair Value				Fair Value
(in thousands)	September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008		September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008		September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
Non-designated hedging instruments
Interest rate option contracts	$	188,050	$	188,050	$	1,008	$	544	$	-	$	-

Cash flow hedging instruments
Interest rate swap contracts	$	-	$	80,000	$	-	$	1,291	$	-	$	-

The following table shows the location and amount of gains and losses related to derivatives used for risk management purposes that were recorded in the consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.

	Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Operations on	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Operations on Derivative Three months ended September 30,					Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Operations on Derivative Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	Derivative	2009			2008		2009			2008
Non-designated hedging instruments
Interest rate cap contracts	State tax credit activity, net	$	(188	)	$	-	$	464		$	-
Interest rate swap contracts	Miscellaneous income (loss)	$	62		$	-	$	(344	)	$	-

Client-Related Derivative Instruments. As an accommodation to certain customers, the Company enters into interest rate swaps to economically hedge changes in fair value of certain loans. The table below summarizes the notional amounts and fair values of the client-related derivative instruments.

					Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
	Notional Amount				Fair Value				Fair Value
(in thousands)	September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008		September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008		September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
Non-designated hedging instruments
Interest rate swap contracts	$	30,586	$	17,429	$	114	$	-	$	1,225	$	1,467

Changes in the fair value of client-related derivative instruments are recognized currently in operations. The following table shows the location and amount of gains and losses recorded in the consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.

	Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Operations on	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Operations on Derivative Three months ended September 30,						Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Operations on Derivative Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	Derivative	2009			2008			2009			2008
Non-designated hedging instruments
Interest rate swap contracts	Interest and fees on loans	$	(136	)	$	(82	)	$	(425	)	$	172

NOTE 7—SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

The Company maintains a number of share-based incentive programs, which are discussed in more detail in Note 17 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. There were no stock options, stock-settled stock appreciation rights, or restricted stock units granted in the first nine months of 2009. The share-based compensation expense was $494,000 and $1.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The share-based compensation expense was $631,000 and $1.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.

Employee Stock Options and Stock-settled Stock Appreciation Rights (“SSAR”)
At September 30, 2009, there was $26,000 and $2.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options and SSAR’s, respectively, which is expected to be recognized over weighted average periods of 1.1 and 2.9 years, respectively. Following is a summary of the employee stock option and SSAR activity for the first nine months of 2009.

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2008		827,471		$	17.03
Granted		-			-
Exercised		(1,500	)		10.00
Forfeited		(28,236	)		22.82
Outstanding at September 30, 2009		797,735		$	16.84		5.7 years	$	-
Exercisable at September 30, 2009		512,892		$	14.55		4.1 years	$	-
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2009		735,721		$	16.24		5.7 years	$	-

Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”)
At September 30, 2009, there was $2.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to the RSU’s, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.4 years. A summary of the Company's restricted stock unit activity for the first nine months of 2009 is presented below.

	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2008		150,463		$	22.89
Granted		-			-
Vested		(5	)		22.63
Forfeited		(17,879	)		23.33
Outstanding at September 30, 2009		132,579		$	22.83

Stock Plan for Non-Management Directors
Shares are issued twice a year and compensation expense is recorded as the shares are earned, therefore, there is no unrecognized compensation expense related to this plan. The Company recognized $0 and $105,000 of stock-based compensation expense for the directors for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The Company recognized $0 and $97,000 of stock-based compensation expense for the directors for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. Pursuant to this plan, the Company issued 8,829 and 4,434 shares in the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Moneta Plan
As of December 31, 2006, the fair value of all Moneta options had been expensed. As a result, there have been no option-related expenses for Moneta in 2009 or 2008. Following is a summary of the Moneta stock option activity for the first nine months of 2009.

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2008		91,001		$	13.55
Granted		-			-
Exercised		(22,462	)		10.33
Forfeited		(39,193	)		14.98
Outstanding at September 30, 2009		29,346		$	14.10		2.2 years	$	-
Exercisable at September 30, 2009		29,346		$	14.10		2.2 years	$	-

NOTE 8—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Below is a description of certain assets and liabilities measured at fair value.

State tax credits held for sale. At September 30, 2009, of the $48.0 million of state tax credits held for sale on the consolidated balance sheet, approximately $36.6 million were carried at fair value. The remaining $11.4 million of state tax credits were accounted for at cost. The Company elected not to account for the state tax credits purchased in the first nine months of 2009 at fair value in order to limit the volatility of the fair value changes in our consolidated statements of operations.

The fair value of the state tax credits carried at fair value decreased by $280,000 in the first nine months of 2009 compared to a $1.2 million increase in the first nine months of 2008. These fair value changes are included in State tax credit activity, net in the consolidated statements of operations.

The following table summarizes financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value.

	Quoted
	Prices in
	Active
	Markets for		Significant		Significant
	Identical		Other		Unobservable
	Assets		Observable		Inputs		Total Fair
(in thousands)	(Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		(Level 3)		Value
Assets
Securities available for sale	$	-	$	197,521	$	-	$	197,521
State tax credits held for sale		-		-		36,569		36,569
Derivative financial instruments		-		1,122		-		1,122
Portfolio loans		-		17,658		-		17,658
Total assets	$	-	$	216,301	$	36,569	$	252,870

Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments	$	-	$	1,225	$	-	$	1,225
Total liabilities	$	-	$	1,225	$	-	$	1,225

The following table presents the changes in Level 3 financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009.

	State tax credits
(in thousands)	held for sale
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	39,142
Total gains or losses (realized and unrealized):
Included in earnings		509
Included in other comprehensive income		-
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net		(3,082	)
Transfer in and/or out of Level 3		-
Balance at September 30, 2009	$	36,569

Change in unrealized gains or losses relating to
assets still held at the reporting date	$	(280	)

From time to time, the Company measures certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or fair value that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. The following table presents financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2009.

			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable		Total gains (losses) for
	Total Fair		Assets		Inputs		Inputs		the nine months ended
(in thousands)	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		September 30, 2009
Loans held for sale	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Impaired loans		11,070		-		11,070		-		(21,408	)
Other real estate		5,791		-		5,791		-		(1,802	)
Long-lived assets held and used		-		-		-		-		-
Goodwill		-		-		-		-		(45,377	)
Total	$	16,861	$	-	$	16,861	$	-	$	(68,587	)

Impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral. Fair values for impaired loans are obtained from current appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers or independent valuation specialists. Other real estate owned is adjusted to fair value upon foreclosure of the underlying loan. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Fair value of other real estate is based upon the current appraised values of the properties as determined by qualified licensed appraisers.

Following is a summary of the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments on the consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

	September 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated
(in thousands)	Amount		fair value		Amount		fair value
Balance sheet assets
Cash and due from banks	$	12,519	$	12,519	$	25,626	$	25,626
Federal funds sold		1,771		1,771		2,637		2,637
Interest-bearing deposits		82,651		82,651		14,384		14,384
Securities available for sale		197,521		197,521		96,431		96,431
Other investments		13,548		13,548		11,884		11,884
Loans held for sale		2,130		2,130		2,632		2,632
Derivative financial instruments		1,121		1,121		1,835		1,835
Portfolio loans, net		2,068,346		2,076,572		2,167,649		2,212,966
State tax credits, held for sale		47,950		47,894		39,142		39,142
Accrued interest receivable		7,894		7,894		7,557		7,557

Balance sheet liabilities
Deposits		1,853,631		1,859,651		1,792,784		1,800,958
Subordinated debentures		85,081		72,939		85,081		71,394
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		139,001		141,941		119,957		134,691
Other borrowings		265,109		265,131		272,969		272,982
Derivative financial instruments		1,225		1,225		1,467		1,467
Accrued interest payable		2,403		2,403		2,473		2,473

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate such value:

Cash, Federal funds sold, and other short-term instruments
For cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits, and accrued interest receivable (payable), the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value, as such instruments reprice in a short time period.

Securities available for sale
The Company obtains fair value measurements for available for sale debt instruments from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond's terms and conditions.

Other investments
Other investments, which primarily consists of membership stock in the FHLB is reported at cost, which approximates fair value.

Portfolio loans, net
The fair value of adjustable-rate loans approximates cost. The fair value of fixed-rate loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers for the same remaining maturities. The fair value of loans sold under participation agreements (see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) is estimated to equal their carrying value. As described in Note 1, substantially all of the participation agreements were modified in October 2009.

State tax credits held for sale
The fair value of state tax credits held for sale is calculated using an internal valuation model with unobservable market data including discounted cash flows based upon the terms and conditions of the tax credits.

Derivative financial instruments
The fair value of derivative financial instruments is based on quoted market prices by the counterparty and verified by the Company using public pricing information.

Deposits
The fair value of demand deposits, interest-bearing transaction accounts, money market accounts and savings deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Subordinated debentures
Fair value of subordinated debentures is based on discounting the future cash flows using rates currently offered for financial instruments of similar remaining maturities.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances
The fair value of FHLB advances is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using current rates on borrowed money with similar remaining maturities.

Other borrowed funds
Other borrowed funds include customer repurchase agreements, federal funds purchased, notes payable and loan participations sold. The fair value of federal funds purchased, customer repurchase agreements and notes payable are assumed to be equal to their carrying amount since they have an adjustable interest rate. The fair value of the loan participations sold (see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) is estimated to equal the carrying value of the of the participated loans.

Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit
The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit would be estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements, the likelihood of the counterparties drawing on such financial instruments, and the present creditworthiness of such counterparties. The Company believes such commitments have been made on terms which are competitive in the markets in which it operates; however, no premium or discount is offered thereon and accordingly, the Company has not assigned a value to such instruments for purposes of this disclosure.

NOTE 9—SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company has two primary operating segments, Banking and Wealth Management, which are delineated by the products and services that each segment offers. The segments are evaluated separately on their individual performance, as well as their contribution to the Company as a whole.

The Banking operating segment consists of a full-service commercial bank, Enterprise, with locations in St. Louis and Kansas City and a loan production office in Phoenix, Arizona. The majority of the Company’s assets and income result from the Banking segment. With the exception of the loan production office, all banking locations have the same product and service offerings, have similar types and classes of customers and utilize similar service delivery methods. Pricing guidelines and operating policies for products and services are the same across all regions.

The Wealth Management segment includes the Trust division of Enterprise, the state tax credit brokerage activities, and Millennium. The Trust division provides estate planning, investment management, and retirement planning as well as consulting on management compensation, strategic planning and management succession issues. State tax credits are part of a fee initiative designed to augment the Company’s wealth management segment and banking lines of business. Millennium operates life insurance advisory and brokerage operations serving life agents, banks, CPA firms, property & casualty groups, and financial advisors in 49 states.

The Corporate segment’s principal activities include the direct ownership of the Company’s banking and non-banking subsidiaries and the issuance of debt and equity. Its principal source of liquidity is dividends from its subsidiaries and stock option exercises.

The financial information for each business segment reflects that information which is specifically identifiable or which is allocated based on an internal allocation method. There were no material intersegment revenues among the three segments. Management periodically makes changes to methods of assigning costs and income to its business segments to better reflect operating results. When appropriate, these changes are reflected in prior year information presented below.

Following are the financial results for the Company’s operating segments.

				Wealth			Corporate and
(in thousands)	Banking			Management			Intercompany			Total
Balance Sheet Information	At September 30, 2009
Portfolio loans, net	$	2,113,365		$	-		$	-		$	2,113,365
Goodwill		-			3,134			-			3,134
Intangibles, net		1,759			932			-			2,691
Deposits		1,871,392			-			(17,761	)		1,853,631
Borrowings		362,445			44,165			82,581			489,191
Total assets		2,441,519			57,513			19,593			2,518,625

	At December 31, 2008
				Wealth			Corporate and
	Banking			Management			Intercompany			Total
Portfolio loans, net	$	2,201,457		$	-		$	-		$	2,201,457
Goodwill		45,378			3,134			-			48,512
Intangibles, net		2,126			1,378			-			3,504
Deposits		1,818,514			-			(25,730	)		1,792,784
Borrowings		360,349			35,077			82,581			478,007
Total assets		2,427,934			48,775			17,058			2,493,767

Income Statement Information	Three months ended September 30, 2009
Net interest income (expense)	$	18,866		$	(314	)	$	(1,167	)	$	17,385
Provision for loan losses		6,480			-			-			6,480
Noninterest income		7,014			2,921			13			9,948
Noninterest expense		10,149			2,736			1,094			13,979
Income (loss) before income tax expense		9,251			(129	)		(2,248	)		6,874
Income tax expense (benefit)		3,456			(100	)		(1,169	)		2,187
Net income (loss)	$	5,795		$	(29	)	$	(1,079	)	$	4,687

	Three months ended September 30, 2008
Net interest income (expense)	$	17,817		$	(295	)	$	(938	)	$	16,584
Provision for loan losses		3,007			-			-			3,007
Noninterest income		4,393			3,233			14			7,640
Noninterest expense		9,542			2,885			806			13,233
Goodwill impairment		-			5,900			-			5,900
Income (loss) before income tax expense		9,661			(5,847	)		(1,730	)		2,084
Income tax expense (benefit)		3,640			(2,128	)		(630	)		882
Net income (loss)	$	6,021		$	(3,719	)	$	(1,100	)	$	1,202

Income Statement Information	Nine months ended September 30, 2009
Net interest income (expense)	$	56,211		$	(852	)	$	(3,625	)	$	51,734
Provision for loan losses		32,012			-			-			32,012
Noninterest income		11,127			8,504			29			19,660
Noninterest expense		30,933			9,239			3,255			43,427
Goodwill impairment		45,377			-			-			45,377
Income (loss) before income tax expense		(40,984	)		(1,587	)		(6,851	)		(49,422	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		1,572			(732	)		(3,161	)		(2,321	)
Net loss	$	(42,556	)	$	(855	)	$	(3,690	)	$	(47,101	)

	Nine months ended September 30, 2008
Net interest income (expense)	$	53,056		$	(766	)	$	(2,764	)	$	49,526
Provision for loan losses		10,214			-			-			10,214
Noninterest income		7,927			9,483			211			17,621
Noninterest expense		28,408			8,787			2,594			39,789
Goodwill impairment		-			5,900			-			5,900
Income (loss) before income tax expense		22,361			(5,970	)		(5,147	)		11,244
Income tax expense (benefit)		8,102			(2,173	)		(1,874	)		4,055
Net income (loss)	$	14,259		$	(3,797	)	$	(3,273	)	$	7,189

ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Readers should note that in addition to the historical information contained herein, some of the information in this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements typically are identified with use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “potential,” “could”, and similar words, although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. You should be aware that the Company’s actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including: burdens imposed by federal and state regulation, changes in accounting regulation or standards of banks; credit risk; exposure to general and local economic conditions; risks associated with rapid increase or decrease in prevailing interest rates; consolidation within the banking industry; competition from banks and other financial institutions; our ability to attract and retain relationship officers and other key personnel and technological developments; and other risks discussed in more detail in Item 1A: “Risk Factors” on our most recently filed Form 10-K, all of which could cause the Company’s actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date of the statements. The Company does not intend to publicly revise or update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this report. Readers should carefully review all disclosures we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission which are available on our website at www.enterprisebank.com.

Introduction
The following discussion describes the significant changes to the financial condition of the Company that have occurred during the first nine months of 2009 compared to the financial condition as of December 31, 2008. In addition, this discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting the consolidated results of operations, liquidity and cash flows of the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements included in this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Operating Results
Net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 was $4.7 million compared to $1.2 million for the same period of 2008. After deducting dividends on preferred stock, the Company reported net income of $0.31 per fully diluted share for the third quarter of 2009 compared to net income of $0.09 per fully diluted share for the third quarter of 2008.

During a review of loan participation agreements, the Company determined that certain of its loan participation agreements contained language inconsistent with sale accounting treatment. The agreements provided us with the unilateral ability to repurchase participated loans at their outstanding loan balance plus accrued interest at any time. In effect, the repurchase option afforded us with effective control over the participated portion of the loan, which conflicts with sale accounting treatment.

In order to correct the error, we recorded the participated portion of such loans as portfolio loans, along with a secured borrowing liability (included in Other borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets) to finance the loans. We also recorded incremental interest income on the loans offset by incremental interest expense on the secured borrowing. Additional provisions for loan losses and the related income tax effect were also recorded. We have corrected the error by revising the prior period financial statements.

Under the terms of the agreements, the participating banks absorb credit losses, if any, on the participated portion of the loan. However, as secured borrowings on our consolidated financial statements, the reduction of the liability to the participating bank is recorded only upon legal defeasance of such liability. As a result, during the third quarter of 2009, we also recorded a $5.3 million pre-tax gain, or $0.26 per fully diluted share, from the extinguishment of debt resulting from the foreclosure of the collateral on one of our participated loans, which was carried net of provisions for loan losses totaling $5.3 million in previous periods.

In October 2009 the Company obtained amended agreements from substantially all of the participating banks that comply with sale accounting treatment. As a result, the Company expects to eliminate the participated loans, net of the allowance for losses, and the related liability from its consolidated balance sheet, and is expected to recognize an additional gain from the extinguishment of debt of approximately $1.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. The overall effect of these adjustments by December 31, 2009 is expected to be neutral to the Company’s financial results and key ratios. For comparative purposes, the affected prior period results, excluding Tier 1 and Total Risk-based capital ratios, have been revised. The impact of the error on key ratios is presented below. The error is described in more detail in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

	As of						As of
	September 30, 2009						December 31, 2008
	Excluding
	Loan		Loan						Loan
	Participation		Participations				As originally		Participations
	Impact		Impact		As reported		reported		Impact		As revised
Nonperforming loans to total loans	2.38	%	-0.16	%	2.22	%	1.50	%	0.11	%	1.61	%
Nonperforming assets to total assets	2.80	%	-0.17	%	2.63	%	1.92	%	0.06	%	1.98	%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans	2.30	%	-0.17	%	2.13	%	1.58	%	-0.04	%	1.54	%
Tangible common equity to tangible assets	5.71	%	-0.57	%	5.14	%	6.07	%	-0.69	%	5.38	%


	For the three months ended						For the nine months ended
	September 30, 2009						September 30, 2009
	Excluding
	Loan		Loan						Loan
	Participation		Participations				As originally		Participations
	Impact		Impact		As reported		reported		Impact		As revised
Net interest rate margin (fully tax equivalent)	3.26	%	-0.29	%	2.97	%	3.33	%	-0.30	%	3.03	%
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)	1.31	%	-0.15	%	1.16	%	1.24	%	0.04	%	1.28	%

For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company reported a net loss of $47.1 million, or $3.81 per fully diluted share, compared to net income of $7.2 million, or $0.56 per fully diluted share in the same period of 2008. The year-to-date net loss was attributable to a $45.4 million non-cash accounting charge to eliminate goodwill related to our Banking reporting unit and loan loss provision totaling $32.0 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to $10.2 million in the same period of 2008.

The goodwill impairment charge is a non-cash accounting adjustment that did not reduce the Company’s regulatory or tangible capital position, liquidity or cash flow and did not impact the Company’s operations. The goodwill impairment charge was primarily driven by the deterioration in the general economic environment and the resulting decline in the Company’s share price and market capitalization in the first quarter of 2009.

We are presenting operating earnings (loss) figures, which are not financial measures as defined under U.S. GAAP, because we believe adjusting our results to exclude loan loss provision expenses, impairment charges, special FDIC assessments and unusual gains or losses provides shareholders with a more comparable basis for evaluating our period-to-period operating results and financial performance. Below is a reconciliation of U.S. GAAP (loss) income before income taxes to operating earnings for all quarters of 2009 along with the one year ago quarter.

Our third quarter results reflect a continuation of several favorable trends established during the first half of the year. Our operating earnings, absent the unusually high provision expense and unusual charges and gains of the past few quarters, continue to grow. Third quarter operating earnings were up 4% over the second quarter and 7% over the first quarter. Liquidity also continues to improve. Core deposits continued to increase in the third quarter and have risen 13% since year-end.

	For the Quarter Ended
	Sep 30,			Jun 30,			Mar 30,			Sep 30,
(In thousands)	2009			2009			2009			2008
U.S. GAAP income (loss) before income tax	$	6,874		$	(2,077	)	$	(54,219	)	$	2,084
Goodwill impairment charge		-			-			45,377			5,900
Sale of Kansas City nonstrategic branch/charter		-			-			-			(2,840	)
Sale of other real estate		(86	)		2			(59	)		(242	)
Sale of securities		-			(636	)		(316	)		-
Retention payment		-			-			-			125
Gain on extinguishment of debt		(5,326	)		-			-			-
FDIC special assessment (included in Other noninterest expense)		(202	)		1,100			-			-
Operating earnings (loss) before income tax		1,260			(1,611	)		(9,217	)		5,027
Provision for loan losses		6,480			9,073			16,459			3,007
Operating earnings before income taxes and provision for loan losses	$	7,740		$	7,462		$	7,242		$	8,034

Below are highlights of our Banking and Wealth Management segments. For more information on our segments, see Note 9 – Segment Reporting.

Banking Segment

Loan growth – At September 30, 2009, portfolio loans were $2.11 billion, a decrease of $88.0 million, or 4%, from December 31, 2008. Portfolio loans decreased by $11.0 million, or 1%, from September 30, 2008 and $23.0 million, or 1%, from June 30, 2009. The decrease from year end is primarily due to clients paying down their lines, weak new loan demand and charge-offs. Enterprise continues to pursue prudent lending opportunities to support local economic activity, with new loan approvals of $272.0 since the issuance of preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury in December 2008.
Deposit growth – Total deposits were $1.85 billion at September 30, 2009, an increase of $61.0 million, or 3%, from December 31, 2008. Total deposits increased $166.0 million, or 10%, from September 30, 2008 and $94.0 million, and 5%, from June 30, 2009. Brokered deposits declined $128.0 million from December 31, 2008. Excluding brokered certificates of deposit, “core” deposits grew $302.0 million, or 22%, from a year ago, and $123.0 million, or 8%, during the quarter. Core deposits include certificates of deposit sold to clients through the reciprocal CDARS program. As of September 30, 2009, Enterprise had $133.0 million of reciprocal CDARS deposits outstanding compared to $60.0 million at December 31, 2008.

For the third quarter of 2009, brokered certificates of deposit represented 11% of total deposits on average. For the quarter ended December 31, 2008, brokered deposits represented 20% of total deposits on average and 20% for the third quarter of 2008. Non-interest bearing demand deposits represented 14% of total deposits at September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008. In January, we adjusted our incentive programs to focus our associates on deposit gathering efforts. The Company’s goal is to drive core deposit growth through relationship selling while at the same time effectively managing the overall cost of funds.
Asset quality – Loan loss provision for the third quarter of 2009 was $6.5 million compared to $9.1 million in the second quarter of 2009 and $3.0 million in the third quarter of 2008. The lower loan loss provision in the third quarter compared to the second quarter was due to fewer risk rating downgrades and leveling off of nonperforming loans. The Company continues to monitor loan portfolio risk closely and expects nonperforming asset levels to remain elevated. See Provision for Loan Losses and Nonperforming Assets below for more information.
Liquidity – During the third quarter of 2009, we continued to strengthen our liquidity position by reducing brokered time deposits by $28.0 million and increasing our interest-bearing deposits by $80 million. In addition, we also increased our investment portfolio by $42.0 million.

Wealth Management Segment
Fee income from the Wealth Management segment, including results from state tax credit brokerage activity, totaled $2.9 million in the third quarter of 2009, a decrease of $312,000, or 10%, from the same quarter of 2008. On a year-to-date basis, fee income from the Wealth Management segment, including results from state tax credit brokerage activity, was $8.5 million, a $983,000, or 10%, decrease from the same period in 2008. See Noninterest Income in this section for more information.

Net Interest Income
The Enterprise prime rate remained at 4.00% during the third quarter, and we continued to incorporate floors and increase spreads on our new and renewing loans. We expect to experience continued favorable repricing on maturing certificates of deposit.

Three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) was $17.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $16.8 million for the same period of 2008, an increase of $1.1 million, or 6%. Total interest income decreased $0.9 million offset by a decrease in total interest expense of $2.0 million.

Average interest-earning assets increased $205.3 million, or 9%, to $2.387 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to $2.183 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. Loans increased $65.0 million, or 3%, to $2.123 billion. Investment securities increased $65.0 million, or 55%, to $182.7 million. Short-term investments, including cash balances at the Federal Reserve, increased $75.3 million to $80.9 million compared to $5.6 million in the same period of 2008. Interest income on loans increased $1.0 million from growth, but was offset by a decrease of $2.0 million due to the impact of lower rates, for a net decrease of $1.0 million versus the third quarter of 2008.

For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, average interest-bearing liabilities increased $119.8 million, or 6%, to $2.067 billion compared to $1.947 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The growth in interest-bearing liabilities resulted from a $176.5 million increase in core deposits, a $31.2 million decrease in net brokered certificates of deposit, and a $28.2 million increase in subordinated debentures, offset by a decrease of $53.7 million in borrowed funds including FHLB advances and fed funds purchased. For the third quarter of 2009, interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities increased $1.4 million due to growth; while the impact of declining rates decreased interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities by $3.3 million versus third quarter of 2008, for a net decrease of $1.9 million.

The tax-equivalent net interest rate margin was 2.97% for the third quarter of 2009 compared to 3.07% for the same period of 2008. The decline in the margin was due to sharply falling interest rates, increased levels of nonperforming assets, and a higher concentration of earnings assets at lower rates. Higher average levels of nonperforming loans reduced the net interest rate margin by approximately 0.13% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to a reduction of 0.07% in the third quarter of 2008. The net interest margin for the third quarter was 13 basis points lower than in the second quarter of 2009. The decrease in margin was a result of higher levels of short-term investments and debt and equity securities that offset the effects of improved loan yields and reduced costs of liabilities.

Nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) was $53.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $50.2 million for the same period of 2008, an increase of $3.0 million, or 6%. Total interest income decreased $4.3 million and was offset by a decrease in total interest expense of $7.3 million.

Average interest-earning assets increased $271.3 million, or 13%, to $2.348 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $2.077 billion for the same period of 2008. Loans accounted for the majority of the growth, increasing by $216.9 million, or 11%, to $2.168 billion. Investments in debt and equity securities increased $31.7 million, or 28%, to $144.5 million. Short-term investments increased $22.8 million, from $12.1 million to $34.9 million.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, average interest-bearing liabilities increased $213.1 million, or 12%, to $2.052 billion compared to $1.839 billion for the same period of 2008. The growth in interest-bearing liabilities resulted primarily from increases to core time deposits and brokered deposits, offset by a decrease in money market balances.

The tax-equivalent net interest rate margin was 3.03% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to 3.23% for the same period of 2008. The reasons for the decline are similar to those described above.

Average Balance Sheet
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, certain information related to our average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as, the corresponding interest rates earned and paid, all on a tax equivalent basis.

	Three months ended September 30,
	2009							2008
				Interest		Average					Interest		Average
	Average			Income/		Yield/		Average			Income/		Yield/
(in thousands)	Balance			Expense		Rate		Balance			Expense		Rate
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Taxable loans (1)	$	2,066,394		$	27,872	5.35	%	$	2,017,032		$	29,420	5.80	%
Tax-exempt loans (2)		56,586			1,380	9.68			40,938			951	9.24
Total loans		2,122,980			29,252	5.47			2,057,970			30,371	5.87
Taxable investments in debt and equity securities		182,149			1,526	3.32			116,930			1,393	4.74
Non-taxable investments in debt and equity
securities (2)		569			9	6.28			766			12	6.23
Short-term investments		80,877			35	0.17			5,626			30	2.12
Total securities and short-term investments		263,595			1,570	2.36			123,322			1,435	4.63
Total interest-earning assets		2,386,575			30,822	5.12			2,181,292			31,806	5.80
Non-interest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		16,868							38,282
Other assets		134,944							166,656
Allowance for loan losses		(45,224	)						(27,547	)
Total assets	$	2,493,163						$	2,358,683

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing transaction accounts	$	119,315		$	165	0.55	%	$	118,455		$	359	1.21	%
Money market accounts		625,952			1,535	0.97			682,741			3,165	1.84
Savings		9,272			9	0.39			8,748			11	0.50
Certificates of deposit		820,825			5,892	2.85			620,145			6,229	4.00
Total interest-bearing deposits		1,575,364			7,601	1.91			1,430,089			9,764	2.72
Subordinated debentures		85,081			1,267	5.91			56,834			805	5.63
Borrowed funds		406,728			4,063	3.96			460,460			4,302	3.72
Total interest-bearing liabilities		2,067,173			12,931	2.48			1,947,383			14,871	3.04
Noninterest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		250,866							215,309
Other liabilities		8,950							10,920
Total liabilities		2,326,989							2,173,612
Shareholders' equity		166,174							185,071
Total liabilities & shareholders' equity	$	2,493,163						$	2,358,683
Net interest income				$	17,891						$	16,935
Net interest spread						2.64	%						2.76	%
Net interest rate margin (3)						2.97							3.09

(1)	Average balances include non-accrual loans. The income on such loans is included in interest but is recognized only upon receipt. Loan fees, net of amortization of deferred loan origination fees and costs, included in interest income are approximately $274,000 and $167,000 for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
(2)	Non-taxable income is presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis using the combined statutory federal and state income tax in effect for the year. The tax-equivalent adjustments were $506,000 and $351,000 for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
(3)	Net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2009							2008
				Interest		Average					Interest		Average
	Average			Income/		Yield/		Average			Income/		Yield/
(in thousands)	Balance			Expense		Rate		Balance			Expense		Rate
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Taxable loans (1)	$	2,109,542		$	83,814	5.31	%	$	1,913,527		$	89,713	6.26	%
Tax-exempt loans (2)		58,942			4,098	9.30			38,045			2,561	8.99
Total loans		2,168,484			87,912	5.42			1,951,572			92,274	6.32
Taxable investments in debt and equity securities		143,880			3,972	3.69			112,020			3,954	4.71
Non-taxable investments in debt and equity
securities (2)		623			29	6.22			818			37	6.04
Short-term investments		34,926			71	0.27			12,145			251	2.76
Total securities and short-term investments		179,429			4,072	3.03			124,983			4,242	4.53
Total interest-earning assets		2,347,913			91,984	5.24			2,076,555			96,516	6.21
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		28,899							40,319
Other assets		146,357							158,364
Allowance for loan losses		(42,117	)						(25,537	)
Total assets	$	2,481,052						$	2,249,701

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing transaction accounts	$	120,767		$	507	0.56	%	$	123,357			1,301	1.41	%
Money market accounts		626,454			4,558	0.97			691,854			11,288	2.18
Savings		9,239			27	0.39			10,164			47	0.62
Certificates of deposit		767,514			17,982	3.13			548,669			17,944	4.37
Total interest-bearing deposits		1,523,974			23,074	2.02			1,374,044			30,580	2.97
Subordinated debentures		85,081			3,928	6.17			56,816			2,551	6.00
Borrowed funds		443,183			11,744	3.54			408,272			12,912	4.22
Total interest-bearing liabilities		2,052,238			38,746	2.52			1,839,132			46,043	3.34
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		240,148							218,270
Other liabilities		8,182							12,268
Total liabilities		2,300,568							2,069,670
Shareholders' equity		180,484							180,031
Total liabilities & shareholders' equity	$	2,481,052						$	2,249,701
Net interest income				$	53,238						$	50,473
Net interest spread						2.72	%						2.87	%
Net interest rate margin (3)						3.03							3.25

(1)	Average balances include non-accrual loans. The income on such loans is included in interest but is recognized only upon receipt. Loan fees, net of amortization of deferred loan origination fees and costs, included in interest income are approximately $1,071,000 and $866,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
(2)	Non-taxable income is presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis using the combined statutory federal and state income tax in effect for the year. The tax-equivalent adjustments were $1,504,000 and $947,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
(3)	Net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

Rate/Volume
The following table sets forth, on a tax-equivalent basis for the periods indicated, a summary of the changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in yield/rates and volume.

	2009 compared to 2008
	3 month									9 month
	Increase (decrease) due to									Increase (decrease) due to
(in thousands)	Volume(1)			Rate(2)			Net			Volume(1)			Rate(2)			Net
Interest earned on:
Taxable loans	$	728		$	(2,276	)	$	(1,548	)	$	8,586		$	(14,485	)	$	(5,899	)
Nontaxable loans (3)		382			47			429			1,448			89			1,537
Taxable investments in debt
and equity securities		630			(497	)		133			983			(965	)		18
Nontaxable investments in debt
and equity securities (3)		(3	)		-			(3	)		(9	)		1			(8	)
Short-term investments		57			(52	)		5			184			(364	)		(180	)
Total interest-earning assets	$	1,794		$	(2,778	)	$	(984	)	$	11,192		$	(15,724	)	$	(4,532	)

Interest paid on:
Interest-bearing transaction accounts	$	3		$	(197	)	$	(194	)	$	(26	)	$	(768	)	$	(794	)
Money market accounts		(244	)		(1,386	)		(1,630	)		(981	)		(5,749	)		(6,730	)
Savings		1			(3	)		(2	)		(4	)		(16	)		(20	)
Certificates of deposit		1,723			(2,060	)		(337	)		5,958			(5,920	)		38
Subordinated debentures		421			41			462			1,301			76			1,377
Borrowed funds		(517	)		278			(239	)		1,037			(2,205	)		(1,168	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,387			(3,327	)		(1,940	)		7,285			(14,582	)		(7,297	)
Net interest income	$	407		$	549		$	956		$	3,907		$	(1,142	)	$	2,765

(1)	Change in volume multiplied by yield/rate of prior period.
(2)	Change in yield/rate multiplied by volume of prior period.
(3)	Nontaxable income is presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis using the combined statutory federal and state income tax rate in effect for each year. NOTE: The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated to rate and volume changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.

Provision for Loan Losses and Nonperforming Assets

The provision for loan losses in the third quarter of 2009 was $6.5 million compared to $9.1 million in the second quarter of 2009 and $3.0 million in the third quarter of 2008. The lower loan loss provision in the third quarter compared to second quarter is due to fewer risk rating downgrades and a leveling off of nonperforming loans. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 2.13% at September 30, 2009 compared to 1.54% at December 31, 2008 and 1.34% at September 30, 2008. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate.

For the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded net charge-offs of $6.2 million, or 1.16%, of average portfolio loans on an annualized basis, compared to $6.5 million, or 1.22%, for the second quarter of 2009 and $1.1 million, or 0.22%, for the third quarter of 2008. Approximately 64% of the charge-offs in the third quarter of 2009 were related to residential real estate loans, 34% related to commercial real estate loans and less than 2% related to commercial and industrial loans.

At September 30, 2009, nonperforming loans were $47.0 million, or 2.22%, of total loans. This compares to $35.5 million, or 1.61%, at December 31, 2008 and $31.9 million, or 1.50%, at September 30, 2008. The $47.0 million balance is comprised of approximately 32 relationships with the largest being a $7.8 million loan secured by a retail strip center. Seven relationships comprise more than 50% of the nonperforming loans. Approximately 54% of the nonperforming loans are located in the Kansas City region, which we believe has encountered a more difficult residential sale environment. As previously noted, because Kansas is a judicial foreclosure state, all foreclosures must be processed through the Kansas state courts. Until the court confirms that the nonperforming loan is in default, we can take no action against the borrower or foreclose on the property. Due to this process, it takes approximately one year for us to foreclose on real estate secured collateral located in the State of Kansas.

Nonperforming loans (“NPL”) at by industry segment were:

	September 30, 2009				June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
			% of				% of				% of
	NPL		Total		NPL		Total		NPL		Total
Commercial Real Estate	$	19.5	41.5	%	$	28.9	52.8	%	$	21.9	61.8	%
Residential Construction/Land
Acquisition and Development		24.6	52.4	%		23.6	43.2	%		11.8	33.3	%
Commercial and Industrial		2.9	6.1	%		2.2	4.0	%		1.7	4.7	%
Other		--	--			--	--			0.1	0.2	%
	$	47.0	100.0	%	$	54.7	100.0	%	$	35.5	100.0	%

Other real estate was $19.3 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $13.9 million at December 31, 2008. The following table summarizes the changes in Other real estate since December 31, 2008.

	2009
	3rd Quarter			2nd Quarter			1st Quarter			Year-to-date
Other real estate at beginning of period	$	16,053		$	13,251		$	13,868		$	13,868
Additions and expenses capitalized
to prepare property for sale		9,915			11,788			1,155			22,858
Writedowns in fair value		(688	)		(506	)		(608	)		(1,802	)
Sales		(6,007	)		(8,480	)		(1,164	)		(15,651	)
Other real estate at end of period	$	19,273		$	16,053		$	13,251		$	19,273

Residential lots and completed homes represented 34% of the Other real estate at September 30, 2009. Of the total Other real estate, 77%, or 25 properties, are located in the Kansas City region and 23%, or 14 properties, are located in the St. Louis region.

Included in the third quarter additions are a $5.0 million medical office building, a $1.9 million retail center, and a $1.2 million retail center. The majority of the Other real estate added in the third quarter were primarily Kansas-based properties.

Since December 31, 2008, we have recorded $1.8 million of fair value declines on 20 properties held in Other real estate. The decline in fair value on these properties was recorded to Other expenses in the 2009 consolidated statement of operations.

While we are encouraged by trends in our nonperforming assets, we expect nonperforming asset levels to remain elevated. Our nonperforming credits continue to be concentrated in residential and commercial real estate segments and those areas remain stressed with persistent downward pressure on valuations. We continue to monitor our loan portfolio for signs of credit weakness in segments other than real estate. Thus far, our commercial and industrial portfolio has shown no significant signs of deterioration. While we have no significant nonperforming assets or past due loans in this sector, certain segments of the commercial and industrial portfolio may be adversely affected should the current economic recession continue for a protracted period of time.

The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for loan losses arising from loans charged off and recoveries on loans previously charged off, by loan category, and additions to the allowance charged to expense.

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008
Allowance at beginning of period	$	44,768		$	26,684		$	33,808		$	22,584
Reduction of allowance from sale of charter		-			(50	)		-			(50	)
Loans charged off:
Commercial and industrial		189			89			2,655			121
Real estate:
Commercial		2,170			497			7,604			832
Construction		2,418			506			7,535			1,530
Residential		1,928			66			3,571			1,998
Consumer and other		-			(2	)		43			11
Total loans charged off		6,705			1,156			21,408			4,492
Recoveries of loans previously charged off:
Commercial and industrial		30			7			35			57
Real estate:
Commercial		96			-			162			-
Construction		2			25			5			152
Residential		347			-			393			43
Consumer and other		1			-			12			9
Total recoveries of loans		476			32			607			261
Net loan chargeoffs		6,229			1,124			20,801			4,231
Provision for loan losses		6,480			3,007			32,012			10,214

Allowance at end of period	$	45,019		$	28,517		$	45,019		$	28,517

Average loans	$	2,122,980		$	2,057,970		$	2,168,484		$	1,951,572
Total portfolio loans		2,113,365			2,124,255			2,113,365			2,124,255
Nonperforming loans		46,982			31,898			46,982			31,898

Net chargeoffs to average loans (annualized)		1.16	%		0.22	%		1.28	%		0.29	%
Allowance for loan losses to loans		2.13			1.34			2.13			1.34

The following table presents the categories of nonperforming assets and other ratios as of the dates indicated.

	September 30			December 31
(in thousands)	2009			2008
Non-accrual loans	$	46,982		$	35,487
Loans past due 90 days or more
and still accruing interest		-			-
Restructured loans		-			-
Total nonperforming loans		46,982			35,487
Foreclosed property		19,273			13,868
Total nonperforming assets	$	66,255		$	49,355

Total assets	$	2,518,625		$	2,493,767
Total loans		2,113,365			2,201,457
Total loans plus foreclosed property		2,132,638			2,215,325

Nonperforming loans to total loans		2.22	%		1.61	%
Nonperforming assets to total loans plus
foreclosed property		3.11			2.23
Nonperforming assets to total assets		2.63			1.98

Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loan		96.00	%		95.00	%

Noninterest Income
Noninterest income was $9.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $2.3 million or 30%, compared to the same period in 2008. The increase is primarily due to the $5.3 million pre-tax gain from the extinguishment of debt during the third quarter of 2009. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for more information. The 2008 results include a $2.8 million pre-tax gain on the sale of the Great American charter along with the Desoto Kansas branch. Excluding these amounts, noninterest income decreased $177,000 or 4%. The decrease is mainly due to lower Wealth Management revenues offset by gains from the state tax credit activities.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, noninterest income increased $2.0 million, or 12%, from the same period in 2008. The 2008 results include a $3.4 million pre-tax gain on the sale of branches. Excluding this amount, and the pre-tax gain from the extinguishment of debt, noninterest income increased $115,000 or 1% in 2009.

Wealth Management revenue – For the three months ended September 30, 2009, Wealth Management revenue decreased $630,000, or 24%, compared to the same period in 2008. Wealth Management revenue decreased $375,000, or 5%, on a year-to-date basis from the same period in 2008.

Trust revenues – For the third quarter of 2009, Trust revenues declined $310,000, or 21% compared to the same quarter in 2008. Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from the Trust division decreased $1.0 million, or 22%, from the same period in 2008. The revenue declines are primarily due to lower asset values due to client turnover and adverse financial markets. The Company recently hired a new head of its advisory sales group and three additional experienced advisors and continues to recruit aggressively in all three Enterprise markets. Trust assets under administration were $1.2 billion at both September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and decreased from $1.5 billion one year ago.
Millennium – Millennium revenues declined $320,000 or 27% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008. The decline was primarily due to the recessionary economic environment and tighter insurance carrier underwriting standards. Millennium revenues increased $647,000, or 19%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period last year. The increase was due to the successful settlement of several large insurance cases in the first quarter of 2009. MBG has experienced wider margins as compared to the year ago period as it takes advantage of better pricing opportunities in the current market. While market conditions remain difficult, we continue to examine strategic alternatives for Millennium.

Service charges on deposit accounts – Increased Service charges on deposit accounts were primarily due to the declining earnings crediting rate on commercial accounts, which increased service charges earned.
Sale of other real estate – For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we sold $6.0 million of Other real estate for a gain of $86,000. Year-to-date through September 30, 2009 we sold $15.7 million of Other real estate for a net gain of $143,000. For the year-to-date period in 2008, we sold $6.2 million of Other real estate for a net gain of $584,000.
State tax credit brokerage activities – For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we recorded a $910,000 gain compared to a $593,000 gain in the third quarter of 2008. Gains of $184,000 from the sale of state tax credits to clients and a fair value adjustment of $914,000 were offset by a $188,000 negative fair value adjustment on the interest rate caps used to economically hedge the tax credits. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded a $973,000 gain on state tax credit activity compared to a $1.6 million gain in the first nine months of 2008. See Note 6 – Derivatives Instruments and Hedging Activities above for more information on the interest rate caps. For more detailed information on the fair value treatment of the state tax credits, see Note 19 – Fair Value Measurements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Sale of investment securities – In the first half of 2009, given the anticipated acceleration in prepayments on mortgage-backed securities and resultant loss in fair value, we elected to sell and reinvest a portion of our investment portfolio. During the first six months of 2009, we sold approximately $49.0 million of agency mortgage backed securities realizing a gain of $952,000 on these sales. In addition, we executed a leverage strategy whereby we borrowed $20.0 million from the FHLB at a weighted average rate of 2.06% for a term of approximately 31 months. With the proceeds from the securities sales, the FHLB advance and other excess cash, we purchased approximately $172.0 million of fixed rate agency mortgage backed and floating rate Small Business Administration securities in 2009. At September 30, 2009, we had approximately $133.4 million of securities that could be pledged or sold to enhance liquidity, if necessary.

Extinguishment of debt – For the quarter ended September 30, 2009 we recorded a $5.3 million pre-tax gain from the extinguishment of debt resulting from the foreclosure of one of our participated loans. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for more information on the accounting treatment of the loan participations.

Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense decreased $5.2 million or 27%, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease is primarily due to a $5.9 million goodwill impairment charge associated with Millennium in the third quarter of 2008. Excluding the goodwill impairment charge, noninterest expenses increased $746,000, or 6%, compared to third quarter of 2008. The increase is primarily due to a $927,000 increase from Loan legal and other real estate expenses related to nonperforming assets. This increase was offset by a $375,000 decrease in salaries and benefits due to staff reductions and lower producer compensation in Millennium.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, noninterest expense increased $43.1 million or 94% from prior year. The increase is due to $45.4 million and $5.9 million of impairment charges related to the banking segment and Millennium, respectively.

Excluding the goodwill impairment charges, noninterest expenses were $43.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $3.6 million, or 9%, from the same period in 2008. The year-over-year increase includes additional FDIC premiums of $2.2 million due to the FDIC special assessment and newly implemented rate structure and $2.9 million of legal and other real estate expenses related to nonperforming assets. These increases are offset by a $1.9 million decrease in salaries and benefits due to staff reductions and reduced incentive compensation.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, increases in Occupancy expenses were primarily due to expenses related to a new Wealth Management location which was occupied in the fourth quarter of 2008.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, Amortization of intangibles decreased $288,000 due to a lower carrying value on the customer related intangible that resulted from the Millennium impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2008.

The Company’s efficiency ratio in the third quarter of 2009 was 51% compared to 79% in the third quarter of 2008. Absent the gain on extinguishment of debt in the third quarter of 2009 and the branch sale gain and impairment charges in the third quarter of 2008, the efficiency ratio was 64% and 62%, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the efficiency ratio is 124% and 68%, respectively. Absent the gain on extinguishment of debt in 2009 and the branch sale gains and impairment charges in 2008, the year-to-date efficiency ratio was 66% and 72%, respectively.

On September 29, 2009, the FDIC announced that at on December 29, 2009, insured institutions will be required to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. We expect the prepayment amount will be approximately $11.0 million. To account for the prepayments, the entire amount of the prepaid FDIC assessment will be recorded as an asset (prepaid expense) on December 29, 2009 and expensed over the subsequent three years.

Income Taxes
Generally, the provision for income taxes is determined by applying an estimated annual effective income tax rate to income before income taxes. The rate is based on the most recent annualized forecast of pretax income, permanent book versus tax differences and tax credits. However, when a reliable estimate of the annual effective tax rate cannot be made, the actual effective tax rate for the year-to-date period may be used. In the third quarter of 2009, the Company concluded that minor changes in the Company’s 2009 estimated pre-tax results and projected permanent items produced significant variability in the estimated annual effective tax rate, and thus, the estimated rate may not be reliable. Accordingly, the Company has determined that the actual effective tax rate for the year-to-date period is the best estimate of the effective tax rate. We re-evaluate the combined federal and state income tax rates each quarter. Therefore, the current projected effective tax rate for the entire year may change.

For the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company’s income tax expense, which includes both federal and state taxes, was $2.2 million compared to $882,000 for the same period in 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the income tax benefit was $2.3 million compared to an income tax expense of $4.1 million for the same period in 2008. The combined federal and state effective income tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 were 31.8% and 4.7%, respectively, compared to 42.3% and 36.1% for the same periods in 2008. Our income tax provision in the first nine months of 2009 reflects the impact of the $45.4 million goodwill impairment charge, which is not tax deductible. The change in the effective tax rate year over year is primarily the result of the nondeductible goodwill impairment charge and other permanent differences related to tax exempt interest and federal tax credits.

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets only to the extent that they are expected to be used to reduce amounts that have been paid or will be paid to tax authorities. Management has determined, based on all positive and negative evidence, that the Company’s deferred tax asset at September 30, 2009 is more likely-than-not-to be realized, and accordingly, no valuation allowance has been recorded.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity management
Increasing our liquidity position is a key initiative for us during 2009. The objective of liquidity management is to ensure the Company has the ability to generate sufficient cash or cash equivalents in a timely and cost-effective manner to meet its commitments as they become due. Funds are available from a number of sources, such as from the core deposit base and from loans and securities repayments and maturities. Additionally, liquidity is provided from sales of the securities portfolio, lines of credit with major banks, the Federal Reserve and the FHLB, the ability to acquire brokered deposits and the ability to sell loan participations to other banks.

The Company’s liquidity management framework includes measurement of several key elements, such as the loan to deposit ratio, volatile liabilities as a percentage of long-term earning assets, and liquid assets plus availability on secured lines as a percentage of certain liabilities. The Company’s liquidity framework also incorporates contingency planning to assess the nature and volatility of funding sources and to determine alternatives to these sources. Strong capital ratios, credit quality and core earnings are essential to retaining cost-effective access to the wholesale funding markets. Deterioration in any of these factors could have an impact on the Company’s ability to access these funding sources and, as a result, these factors are monitored on an ongoing basis as part of the liquidity management process.

While core deposits and loan and investment repayments are principal sources of liquidity, funding diversification is another key element of liquidity management. Diversity is achieved by strategically varying depositor types, terms, funding markets, and instruments.

Parent Company liquidity
The parent company’s liquidity is managed to provide the funds necessary to pay dividends to shareholders, service debt, invest in subsidiaries as necessary, and satisfy other operating requirements. The parent company’s primary funding sources to meet its liquidity requirements are dividends and other payments from subsidiaries and proceeds from the issuance of equity (i.e. stock option exercises).

In December 2008, the Company was approved by the U.S. Treasury for a $62.0 million Capital Purchase Program investment. At the same time, the Company had the opportunity to privately place a Convertible Trust Preferred Security offering. As a result, the Company decided to take advantage of both the private and public capital sources.

On December 12, 2008, we completed a private placement of $25.0 million in Convertible Trust Preferred Securities that qualify as Tier II regulatory capital until they would convert to EFSC common stock. We also received $35.0 million from the U.S. Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program on December 19, 2008.

As of December 31, 2008, $20.0 million of the capital funds were used to pay off the Company’s line of credit and term loan. Our line of credit with a major bank was closed during the first quarter of 2009. In December 2008, we also injected $18.0 million into Enterprise to support continued loan growth and bolster its capital ratios.

As of September 30, 2009, the Company had $82.6 million of outstanding subordinated debentures as part of nine Trust Preferred Securities Pools. These securities are classified as debt but are included in regulatory capital and the related interest expense is tax-deductible, which makes them a very attractive source of funding. Management believes our current level of cash at the holding company of approximately $17.0 million will be sufficient to meet all projected cash needs in 2009.

On June 17, 2009, the Company filed a Shelf Registration statement on Form S-3 for up to $35 million of certain types of our securities. Proceeds from an offering would be used for capital expenditures, repayment or refinancing of indebtedness or other securities from time to time, working capital, to make acquisitions, or for general corporate purposes. The Registration became effective on July 1, 2009. We are sensitive to the dilution a stock offering may have on our shareholders and therefore, are carefully monitoring the equity markets.

Enterprise liquidity
Enterprise is subject to State and FDIC regulations, which among other things may limit its ability to pay dividends or transfer funds to the parent Company. Accordingly, consolidated cash flows as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows may not represent cash immediately available for the payment of cash dividends to the Company’s shareholders or for other cash needs.

During the third quarter of 2009, we continued to strengthen our liquidity position. Core deposit balances increased $122.8 million, including $94.9 million in certificates of deposit, both from the CDARS program and our own CDs. Loan balances declined $21.0 million as loan clients continued using their cash to paydown outstanding loans. The increase in core deposits along with the reduced loan funding requirements enabled us to reduce brokered time deposits by $28.5 million and short-term borrowings by $22.2 million. In addition, we increased our investment portfolio by $42.0 million and increased cash reserves by $48.0 million.

Enterprise has a variety of funding sources available to increase financial flexibility. In addition to amounts currently borrowed, at September 30, 2009, Enterprise could borrow an additional $121.7 million from the FHLB of Des Moines under blanket loan pledges and an additional $290.6 million from the Federal Reserve Bank under a pledged loan agreement. Enterprise has unsecured federal funds lines with three correspondent banks totaling $30.0 million at September 30, 2009.

As of September 30, 2009, of the $197.5 million of the securities available for sale, $64.1 million was pledged as collateral for public deposits, treasury, tax and loan notes, and other requirements. The remaining $133.4 million could be pledged or sold to enhance liquidity, if necessary.

In July 2008, Enterprise joined the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service, or CDARS, which allows us to provide our customers with access to additional levels of FDIC insurance coverage. The Company considers the reciprocal deposits placed through the CDARS program as core funding and does not report the balances as brokered sources in its internal or external financial reports. As of September 30, 2009, the Bank had $133.0 million of reciprocal CDARS deposits outstanding. In addition to the reciprocal deposits available through CDARS, we also have access to the “one-way buy” program, which allows us to bid on the excess deposits of other CDARS member banks. The Company will report any outstanding “one-way buy” funds as brokered funds in its internal and external financial reports. At September 30, 2009, we had no outstanding “one-way buy” deposits.

Finally, because the bank is “well-capitalized”, it has the ability to sell certificates of deposit through various national or regional brokerage firms, if needed. At September 30, 2009, we had $207.6 million of brokered certificates of deposit outstanding compared to $336.0 million outstanding at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $128.4 million.

Over the normal course of business, the Company enters into certain forms of off-balance sheet transactions, including unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. These transactions are managed through the Company’s various risk management processes. Management considers both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet transactions in its evaluation of the Company’s liquidity. The Company has $468.0 million in unused loan commitments as of September 30, 2009. While this commitment level would be difficult to fund given the Company’s current liquidity resources, the nature of these commitments is such that the likelihood of funding them is low.

Regulatory capital
The Company and its bank affiliate are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and its bank affiliate must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The banking affiliate’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and its banking affiliate to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. To be categorized as “well capitalized”, banks must maintain minimum total risk-based (10%), Tier 1 risk-based (6%) and Tier 1 leverage ratios (5%). Management believes, as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, that the Company and its banking affiliates meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

The following table summarizes the Company’s risk-based capital and leverage ratios at the dates indicated:

	At Sept 30			At December 31
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets		7.54	%		8.89	%
Total capital to risk weighted assets		11.87	%		12.81	%
Leverage ratio (Tier I capital to average assets)		6.97	%		8.67	%
Tangible common equity to tangible assets		5.14	%		6.07	%
Tier I capital	$	171,481		$	190,254
Total risk-based capital	$	269,926		$	273,977

Critical Accounting Policies
The impact and any associated risks related to the Company’s critical accounting policies on business operations are discussed throughout “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The Company’s consolidated financial position reflects material amounts of assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value. Securities available for sale and state tax credits held for sale are carried at fair value. The fair value of securities available for sale is based upon measurements from an independent pricing service, including dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data and other information. Fair value of state tax credits held for sale is determined using an internal valuation model with observable market data inputs. Considerable judgment may be required in determining the assumptions used in certain pricing models, including interest rate, credit risk and liquidity risk assumptions. Changes in these assumptions may have a significant effect on values.

New Accounting Standards
In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 860 “Transfers and Servicing” (formerly FASB No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140) which requires additional information regarding transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where companies have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. This standard eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. It is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.

In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“FASB 167”) which has not yet been codified in the ASC. FASB 167 amends Interpretation No. 46(R) to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. Additionally, FASB 167 requires enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in variable interest entities. FASB 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of FASB 167 will have on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.

ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The disclosures set forth in this item are qualified by the section captioned “Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995” included in Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report and other cautionary statements set forth elsewhere in this report.

Market risk arises from exposure to changes in interest rates and other relevant market rate or price risk. The Company faces market risk in the form of interest rate risk through transactions other than trading activities. Market risk from these activities, in the form of interest rate risk, is measured and managed through a number of methods. The Company uses financial modeling techniques to measure interest rate risk. These techniques measure the sensitivity of future earnings due to changing interest rate environments. Guidelines established by the Asset/Liability Management Committees and approved by the Company’s Board of Directors are used to monitor exposure of earnings at risk. General interest rate movements are used to develop sensitivity as the Company feels it has no primary exposure to a specific point on the yield curve. These limits are based on the Company’s exposure to a 100 basis points and 200 basis points immediate and sustained parallel rate move, either upward or downward.

Interest rate simulations for September 30, 2009 demonstrate that a rising rate environment will initially have a negative impact on net interest income because the Enterprise prime rate is set higher than the market prime rate and will not increase with the cost of our deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities.

The following table represents the Company’s estimated interest rate sensitivity and periodic and cumulative gap positions calculated as of September 30, 2009.

														Beyond
														5 years
														or no stated
(in thousands)	Year 1			Year 2			Year 3		Year 4		Year 5			maturity		Total
Interest-Earning Assets
Securities available for sale	$	70,790		$	39,308		$	24,090	$	10,520	$	787		$	52,026	$	197,521
Other investments		-			-			-		-					13,548		13,548
Interest-bearing deposits		82,651			-			-		-		-			-		82,651
Federal funds sold		1,771			-			-		-		-			-		1,771
Loans (1)		1,476,673			203,065			135,952		199,357		5,373			92,945		2,113,365
Loans held for sale		2,130			-			-		-		-			-		2,130
Total interest-earning assets	$	1,634,015		$	242,373		$	160,042	$	209,877	$	6,160		$	158,519	$	2,410,986

Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Savings, NOW and Money market deposits	$	757,542		$	-		$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	757,542
Certificates of deposit		634,083			147,700			28,526		13,760		96			14,023		838,188
Subordinated debentures		32,064			10,310			14,433		-		28,274			-		85,081
Other borrowings		351,156			20,396			22,096		87		7			10,368		404,110
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	1,774,845		$	178,406		$	65,055	$	13,847	$	28,377		$	24,391	$	2,084,921

Interest-sensitivity GAP
GAP by period	$	(140,830	)	$	63,967		$	94,987	$	196,030	$	(22,217	)	$	134,128	$	326,065
Cumulative GAP	$	(140,830	)	$	(76,863	)	$	18,124	$	214,154	$	191,937		$	326,065	$	326,065
Ratio of interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities
Periodic		0.92			1.36			2.46		15.16		0.22			6.50		1.16
Cumulative GAP as of September 30, 2009		0.92			0.96			1.01		1.11		1.09			1.16		1.16

(1) Adjusted for the impact of the interest rate swaps.

ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of September 30, 2009, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic SEC filings is processed, recorded, summarized and reported when required. There were no changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in the Company’s internal controls that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, those controls.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6: EXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number		Description
	Registrant herby agrees to furnish to the Commission, upon request, the instruments defining the rights of holders of each issue of long-term debt of Registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries.

*31.1	Chief Executive Officer’s Certification required by Rule 13(a)-14(a).

*31.2	Chief Financial Officer’s Certification required by Rule 13(a)-14(a).

**32.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

**32.2	Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* Filed herewith

** Furnished herewith. Notwithstanding any incorporation of this Quarterly Statement on Form 10-Q in any other filing by the Registrant, Exhibits furnished herewith and designated with two (**) shall not be deemed incorporated by reference to any other filing unless specifically otherwise set forth herein.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Clayton, State of Missouri on the day of November 6, 2009.

	ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP

	By:	/s/ Peter F. Benoist
		Peter F. Benoist
		Chief Executive Officer


	By:	/s/ Frank H. Sanfilippo
		Frank H. Sanfilippo
		Chief Financial Officer

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP Reports