“Safe Harbor” Statement Under Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

---

Certain statements contained in the Company’s periodic reports, public statements and other filings, including this one, and in particular in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” may be forward-looking and subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties. These factors include, but are not limited to:
(1) changes in prevailing interest rates which would affect the interest earned on the Company’s interest earning assets and the interest paid on its interest bearing liabilities; 
(2) the timing of re-pricing of the Company’s interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities;
(3) the effect of changes in governmental monetary policy;
(4) the effect of changes in regulations applicable to the Company and the Bank and the conduct of its business;
(5) changes in competition among financial service companies, including possible further encroachment of non-banks on services traditionally provided by banks; 
(6) the ability of competitors that are larger than the Company to provide products and services which it is impracticable for the Company to provide;
(7) the state of the economy and real estate values in the Company’s market areas, and the consequent effect on the quality of the Company’s loans; 
(8) demand for loans and deposits in our market area;
(9) recent governmental initiatives that are expected to have a profound effect on the financial services industry and could dramatically  change the competitive environment of the Company;
(10) other legislative or regulatory changes, including those related to residential mortgages, changes in accounting standards, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation  (“FDIC”) premiums that may adversely affect the Company;
(11) the application of generally accepted accounting principles, consistently applied; 
(12) the fact that one period of reported results may not be indicative of future periods;
(13) the state of the economy in the greater New York metropolitan area and its particular effect on the Company's customers, vendors and communities and other such factors, including risk factors, as may be described in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”);
(14) political, social, legal and economic instability, civil unrest, war, catastrophic events, acts of terrorism;
(15) widespread outbreaks of infectious diseases, including the ongoing novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak;
(16) changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in estimates of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; 
(17) our ability to access cost-effective funding;
(18) our ability to implement and change our business strategies;
(19) changes in the quality or composition of our loan or investment portfolios; 
(20) technological changes that may be more difficult or expensive than expected;
(21) our ability to manage market risk, credit risk and operational risk in the current economic environment; 
(22) our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;
(23) changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; 
(24) our ability to retain key employees; and
(25) our compensation expense associated with equity allocated or awarded to our employees.

 

Although the Company believes that it offers competitive loan and deposit products and has the resources needed for continued success, future revenues and interest spreads and yields as well as loan losses and demand cannot be reliably predicted. These trends may cause the Company to adjust its operations in the future. Because of the foregoing and other factors, recent and historical trends should not be considered reliable indicators of future financial results or stock prices.

 

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1. Business

 

General

 

Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), a Connecticut corporation, is a one-bank holding company for Patriot Bank, N.A, a national banking association headquartered in Stamford, Fairfield County, Connecticut (the “Bank”) (collectively, “Patriot”). The Bank received its charter and com‐menced operations as a national bank on August 31, 1994. The Bank has a total of nine branch offices comprised of eight branch offices located in Fairfield and New Haven Counties, Connecticut and one branch office located in Westchester County, New York as of December 31, 2020.

 

On March 11, 2003, the Company formed Patriot National Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”) for the sole purpose of issuing trust preferred securities and investing the proceeds in subordinated debentures issued by the Company. The Company primarily invested the funds from the issuance of the debt in the Bank. The Bank used the proceeds to fund general operations.

 

On October 15, 2010, pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”), the Company issued and sold to PNBK Holdings LLC (“Holdings”), an investment limited liability company controlled by Michael Carrazza, 3.36 million shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $15.00 per share (adjusted for a 1-for-10 reverse stock split discussed below) for an aggregate purchase price of $50.4 million. The shares sold to Holdings represented 87.6% of the Company’s then issued and outstanding common stock. In connection with the reverse stock split, the par value of the common stock was changed to $0.01 per share. Also in connection with the sale of the shares, certain directors and officers of both the Company and the Bank resigned. Such directors and officers were replaced with nominees of Holdings and Michael Carrazza became the Chairman of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company. As of the date hereof, Holdings currently owns 56.7% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock.

 

As of the date hereof, the only business of the Company is its ownership of all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Bank and the Trust. Except as specifically noted otherwise herein, the balance of the description of the Company’s business is a description of the Bank’s business.

 

On March 4, 2015, the Company effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split.

 

On September 28, 2015, the Bank changed its name from Patriot National Bank to Patriot Bank, N.A.

 

On May 10, 2017, Joseph D. Perillo was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of Patriot effective as of May 9, 2017. Mr. Perillo’s appointment was in response to the resignation of Neil M. McDonnell, who was Chief Financial Officer of Patriot from January 5, 2016 through May 9, 2017 and who resigned on that date as an Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

 

On July 7, 2020, Robert G. Russell, Jr. was appointed as President and Chief Executive Officer of Patriot. Mr. Russell’s appointment was in response to the resignation of Richard A. Muskus, Jr., who was President and Director of the Company and the Bank from January 26, 2017 through April 27, 2020.

 

The Bedford branch was closed on February 28, 2018 and its business and staff transferred to the Scarsdale branch.

 

On May 10, 2018, the Bank completed its acquisition of Prime Bank, a Connecticut bank headquartered in Orange, CT (“Prime Bank”). The closing of the transaction added a new Patriot branch located in the Town of Orange, New Haven County, Connecticut. The results of Prime Bank’s operations are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

 

 

Business Operations

 

The Bank offers commercial real estate loans, commercial business loans, SBA loans, and a variety of consumer loans with an emphasis on serving the needs of individuals, small and medium‑sized businesses and professionals. The Bank previously had offered loans on residential real estate but discontinued doing so during 2013. Since 2016, Patriot has purchased residential real estate loans. Further information relating to the purchased residential real estate loans is set forth in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements. The Bank’s lending activities are conducted principally in Fairfield and New Haven Counties in Connecticut and Westchester County in New York, although the Bank’s loan business is not necessarily limited to these areas.

 

Consumer and commercial deposit accounts offered include: checking, interest‑bearing negotiable order of withdrawal (“NOW”), money market, time certificates of deposit, savings, prepaid deposit accounts, on-line national money market accounts, Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”), Individual Retirement Accounts (“IRAs”), and Health Savings Accounts (“HSAs”). Other services offered by the Bank include Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) transfers, lockbox, internet banking, bill paying, remote deposit capture, debit cards, money orders, traveler’s checks, and automatic teller machines (“ATMs”). In addition, the Bank may in the future offer other financial services.

 

On July 22, 2020, the Company completed the purchase of prepaid debit card deposits of $50.0 million from a prominent national provider and processor of prepaid debit cards for corporate, consumer and government clients.

 

The Bank’s branch office locations are summarized as follows:

 

Branch No.		City		County		State
1		Darien		Fairfield		Connecticut
2		Fairfield		Fairfield		Connecticut
3		Greenwich		Fairfield		Connecticut
4		Milford		New Haven		Connecticut
5		Norwalk		Fairfield		Connecticut
6		Orange		New Haven		Connecticut
7		Stamford		Fairfield		Connecticut
8		Westport		Fairfield		Connecticut
9		Scarsdale		Westchester		New York

 

The Stamford, Connecticut location serves as Patriot’s headquarters. Additionally, the Bank also operates a loan origination office at its Stamford location.

 

The Bank’s employees perform most routine day-to-day banking transactions. The Bank has entered into a number of arrangements with third-party outside service providers, who provide services such as correspondent banking, check clearing, data processing services, credit card processing and armored car carrier transport.

 

In the normal course of business, subject to applicable government regulations, the Bank invests a portion of its assets in investment securities, which may include government securities. The Bank’s investment portfolio strategy is to maintain a balance of high-quality diversified investments that minimizes risk, maintains adequate levels of liquidity, and limits exposure to interest rate and credit risk. Guaranteed U.S. federal government issues currently comprise the majority of the Bank’s investment portfolio.

 

Patriot became an approved lender under the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) program at the end of 2017, enabling it to approve loans to small businesses and entrepreneurs more quickly and efficiently. Since 2018, Patriot has hired people to support new SBA business development in Stamford, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Ohio, along with a Rhode Island operations center.

 

Employees

As of December 31, 2020, Patriot had 122 full-time equivalent employees. None of Patriot’s employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

 

 

Competition

The Bank competes with a variety of financial institutions for loans and deposits in its market area. These include larger financial institutions with greater financial resources, larger branch systems and higher lending limits, as well as the ability to conduct larger advertising campaigns to attract business. The larger financial institutions may also offer additional services such as trust and international banking, which the Bank is not equipped to offer directly. When the need arises, arrangements are made with correspondent financial institutions to provide such services. To attract business in this competitive environment, the Bank relies on local promotional activities, personal contact by officers and directors, customer referrals, and its ability to distinguish itself by offering personalized and responsive banking service.

 

The customer base of the Bank generally is meant to be diversified, so that there is not a concentration of either loans or deposits within a single industry, a group of industries, or a single person or groups of people. The Bank is not dependent on one or a few major customers for its lending or deposit activities, the loss of any one of which would have a material adverse effect on the business of the Bank.

 

The Bank’s loan customers extend beyond the towns and cities in which the Bank has branch offices, including nearby towns in Fairfield and New Haven Counties in Connecticut, and Westchester County and the five boroughs of New York City in New York, although the Bank’s loan business is not necessarily limited to these areas. While the Bank does not currently hold or intend to attract significant deposit or loan business from major corporations with headquarters in its market area, the Bank believes that small manufacturers, distributors and wholesalers, and service industry professionals and related businesses, which have been attracted to this area, as well as the individuals that reside in the area, represent current and potential customers of the Bank.

 

In recent years, intense market demands, economic pressures, and significant legislative and regulatory actions have eroded banking industry classifications, which were once clearly defined, and have increased competition among banks, as well as other financial services institutions including non-bank competitors. This increase in competition has caused banks and other financial services institutions to diversify their services and become more cost effective. The impact of market dynamics, legislative, and regulatory changes on banks and other financial services institutions has increased customer awareness of product and service differences among competitors and increased merger activity among banks and other financial services institutions.

 

Supervision and Regulation

As a bank holding company, the Company’s operations are subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Fed”). The Fed has established capital adequacy guidelines for bank holding companies that are similar to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (“OCC”) capital guidelines applicable to the Bank. The Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC”), limits the types of companies that a bank holding company may acquire or organize and the activities in which it or they may engage. In general, bank holding companies and their subsidiaries are only permitted to engage in, or acquire direct control of, any company engaged in banking or in a business so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident thereto. Federal legislation enacted in 1999 authorizes certain entities to register as financial holding companies. Registered financial holding companies are permitted to engage in businesses, including securities and investment banking businesses, which are prohibited to bank holding companies. The creation of financial holding companies has had no significant impact on the Company.

 

Under the BHC, the Company is required to file semi-annual reports of its operations with the Fed for the period ended June 30 and for the year ended December 31. Patriot and any of its subsidiaries are subject to examination by the Fed. In addition, the Company will be required to obtain the prior approval of the Fed, with certain exceptions, to acquire more than 5% of the outstanding voting stock of any bank or bank holding company, to acquire all or substantially all of the assets of a bank, or to merge or consolidate with another bank holding company. Moreover, Patriot and any of its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements, in connection with any extension of credit or provision of any property or services. The Bank is also subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on issuing any extension of credit to the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or making any investments in the stock or other securities thereof, and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. If the Company wants to engage in businesses permitted to financial holding companies, but not to bank holding companies, it would need to register with the Fed as a financial holding company.

 

 

The Fed has issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, which expresses its view that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the bank holding company’s net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividend and a rate of earnings retention that is consistent with the bank holding company’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition. The Fed has also indicated that it would be inappropriate for a bank holding company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. Furthermore, under the prompt corrective action regulations adopted by the Fed, if any of its subsidiaries is classified as “undercapitalized”, the bank holding company may be prohibited from paying dividends.

 

A bank holding company is required to give the Fed prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its outstanding equity securities, if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of its consolidated retained earnings. The Fed may disapprove of such a purchase or redemption, if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law, regulation, Fed order, or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Fed.

 

The Company is subject to capital adequacy rules and guidelines issued by the Fed and the FDIC and the Bank is subject to capital adequacy rules and guidelines issued by the OCC. These substantially identical rules and guidelines require Patriot to maintain certain minimum ratios of capital to adjusted total assets and/or risk-weighted assets. Under the provisions of the FDIC Improvements Act of 1991, the federal regulatory agencies are required to implement and enforce these rules in a stringent manner. The Company is also subject to applicable provisions of Connecticut law, insofar as they do not conflict with, or are not otherwise preempted by, federal banking law. Patriot’s operations are subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the FDIC and the OCC.

 

Federal and state banking regulations govern, among other things, the scope of the business of a bank, a bank holding company, or a financial holding company, the investments a bank may make, deposit reserves a bank must maintain, the establishment of branches, and the activities of a bank with respect to mergers and acquisitions. The Bank is a member of the Fed and, as such, is subject to applicable provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and regulations thereunder. The Bank is subject to the federal regulations promulgated pursuant to the Financial Institutions Supervisory Act that are designed to prevent banks from engaging in unsafe and unsound practices, as well as various other federal, state, and consumer protection laws. The Bank is also subject to the comprehensive provisions of the National Bank Act.

 

The OCC regulates the number and locations of branch offices of a national bank. The OCC may only permit a national bank to maintain branches in locations and under the conditions imposed by state law upon state banks. At this time, applicable Connecticut banking laws do not impose any material restrictions on the establishment of branches by Connecticut banks throughout Connecticut. New York State law is similar; however, the Bank cannot establish a branch in a New York town with a population of less than 50,000 inhabitants, if another bank is headquartered in that town.

 

The earnings and growth of Patriot and the banking industry in general are affected by the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States (“U.S.”) government and its agencies, particularly the Fed. The Open Market Committee of the Fed implements national monetary policy to curb inflation and combat recession. The Fed uses its power to adjust interest rates on U.S. government securities, the discount rate, and deposit reserve retention rates. The actions of the Fed influence the growth of bank loans, investments, and deposits. They also affect interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. The nature and impact of any future changes in monetary policies cannot be predicted.

 

In addition to other laws and regulations, Patriot is subject to the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), which requires the federal bank regulatory agencies, when considering certain applications involving Patriot, to consider Patriot’s record of helping to meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA was originally enacted because of concern over unfair treatment of prospective borrowers by banks and unwarranted geographic differences in lending patterns. Existing banks have sought to comply with the CRA in various ways; some banks have made use of more flexible lending criteria for certain types of loans and borrowers (consistent with the requirement to conduct safe and sound operations), while other banks have increased their efforts to make loans to help meet identified credit needs within the consumer community, such as those for home mortgages, home improvements, and small business loans. Compliance may also include participation in various government insured lending programs, such as Federal Housing Administration insured or Veterans Administration guaranteed mortgage loans, Small Business Administration loans, and participation in other types of lending programs such as high loan-to-value ratio conventional mortgage loans with private mortgage insurance. To date, the market area from which the Bank draws much of its business is in the towns and cities in which the Bank has branch offices, which are characterized by a very diverse ethnic, economic and racial cross-section of the population. As the Bank expands further, the market areas served by the Bank will continue to evolve. The Company and the Bank have not and will not adopt any policies or practices, which discourage credit applications from, or unlawfully discriminate against, individuals or segments of the communities served by the Bank.

 

 

On October 26, 2001, the United and Strengthening America by Providing Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”) was enacted to further strengthen domestic security following the September 11, 2001 attacks. The Patriot Act amended various federal banking laws, particularly the Bank Secrecy Act, with the intent to curtail money laundering and other activities that might be undertaken to finance terrorist actions. The Patriot Act also requires that financial institutions in the U.S. enhance already established anti-money laundering policies, procedures and audit functions, and ensure that controls are reasonably designed to detect instances of money laundering through certain correspondent or private banking accounts. Verification of customer identification, maintenance of said verification records, and cross-checking names of new customers against government lists of known or suspected terrorists is also required. The Patriot Act was reauthorized and modified with the enactment of The USA Patriot Act Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005.

 

The Company is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and, in accordance with the Exchange Act, files periodic reports, proxy statements, and other information with the SEC.

 

On July 20, 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) was enacted, the primary purpose of which is to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities laws, and for other purposes. Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, entitled Management Assessment of Internal Controls, requires that each annual report include an internal control report which states that it is the responsibility of management for establishing and maintaining an adequate internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting, as well as an assessment by management of the effectiveness of the internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. This section further requires that the external auditors attest to, and report on, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting; although, Smaller Reporting Companies as defined by the SEC are exempt from this requirement. Sarbanes-Oxley contains provisions for the limitations of services that external auditors may provide, as well as requirements for the credentials of members of the Audit Committee of Patriot’s Board of Directors. In addition, Sarbanes-Oxley requires principal executive and principal financial officers to certify to the adequacy of internal controls over financial reporting and to the accuracy of financial information released to the public on a quarterly and annual basis. Specifically, Sarbanes-Oxley requires Patriot’s Chief Executive and Chief Financial officer to certify that, to their best of their knowledge, the financial information reported accurately presents the financial condition and results of operations of the Company and that it contains no untrue statement or omission of material fact. Patriot’s Chief Executive and Chief Financial officer also are required to certify to their responsibility for establishing and maintaining a system of internal controls, the design and implementation of which insures that all material information is made known to these officers or other responsible individuals; this certification also includes the evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, and the impact thereof, on the Company’s financial reporting.

 

Recent Legislative Developments

Many of the provisions of The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank) are aimed at financial institutions that are significantly larger than Patriot. Notwithstanding this, there are many other provisions that Patriot is subject to and had to comply with since July 21, 2010, including any applicable rules promulgated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). As rules and regulations are promulgated by the agencies responsible for implementing and enforcing Dodd-Frank, Patriot will have to address them to ensure compliance with such applicable provisions. Management expects the cost of compliance to increase, due to the regulatory burden imposed by Dodd-Frank.

 

Dodd-Frank also broadened the base for FDIC insurance assessments. Under rules issued by the FDIC in February 2011, the base for insurance assessments changed from domestic deposits to consolidated assets less tangible equity. Assessment rates are calculated using formulas that take into account the risks of the institution being assessed. The rule was effective beginning April 1, 2011 and did not have a material impact on the Company.

 

Financial reform legislation and the implementation of any rules ultimately issued could have adverse implications on the financial industry, the competitive environment, and the Bank’s ability to conduct business.

 

 

In July 2013, the Fed, the FDIC, and the OCC approved final rules establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for U.S. Banking organizations (the “New Capital Rules”). The New Capital Rules generally implemented the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s (the “Basel Committee”) December 2010 final capital framework (referred to as “Basel III”) for strengthening international capital standards. The New Capital Rules substantially revised the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries, including Patriot.

 

In September 2019, the community bank leverage ratio (CBLR) framework was jointly issued by the FDIC, OCC and Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”). The final rule gives qualifying community banks the option to use a simplified measure of capital adequacy instead of risk based capital, beginning with their March 31, 2020 Call Report. Under the final rule a community bank may qualify for the CBLR framework if it has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of greater than 9%, less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, and limited amounts of off-balance sheet exposures and trading assets and liabilities.

 

Recent Developments with Regulators

 

In November 2018 the Bank entered into a formal written agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Office of the OCC. The Agreement states the Board and the Bank would develop, implement and revise written documents and policies related to executive compensation, conflict of interest, internal audit, liquidity and asset/liability management, commercial loan administration, leveraged lending, practices relating to the allowance for loan and lease losses, and assumptions used in the Bank’s interest rate risk model. Under the Agreement the Bank agreed to provide a revised written 3-year strategic and capital plan for the Bank. The Bank provided the documents and policies requested in the Agreement and has provided updated documents and policies pursuant to the agreement.

 

To date, the Bank has addressed each of the items identified in the Agreement and is currently working collaboratively with the OCC to bring all matters to full resolution.

 

Available Information

The Company’s website address is https://www.bankpatriot.com; however, information found on, or that can be accessed through, the website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. The Company makes available free of charge on its website (under the links entitled “For Investors”, then “SEC filings”, then “Documents”), its annual report on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, information statements on Schedule 14C, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, as soon as practicable after such reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Because the Company is an electronic filer, such reports are filed with the SEC and are also available on their website (http://www.sec.gov). The public may also read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E. Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. Information about the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling 1-800-551-8090 or SEC Investor Information Service 1-800-SEC-0330.

 

 

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

 

Patriot’s financial condition and results of operation are subject to various risks inherent to its business, including those noted below.

 

The risks involved in the Bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio are material.

The Bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio constitutes a material portion of its assets and generally has different risks than residential mortgage loans. Commercial real estate loans often involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers as compared to single-family residential loans.

 

Because the repayment of commercial real estate loans depends on the successful management and operation of the borrower’s properties or related businesses, repayments of such loans can be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or local economy. A downturn in the real estate market within the Bank’s market area may adversely impact the value of properties securing these loans. These risks are partially offset by shorter terms, reduced loan-to-value ratios, and guarantor support of the borrower.

 

Real estate lending in the Bank’s core market involves risks related to a decline in value of commercial and residential real estate.

The market value of real estate can fluctuate significantly in a relatively short period of time, as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which real estate is located. A significant portion of the Bank’s total loan portfolio is secured by real estate located in Fairfield County, Connecticut and Westchester County, New York, areas historically of high affluence that had been materially impacted by the financial troubles experienced by large financial service companies on Wall Street and other companies during the financial crisis as well as the changes in tax laws.

 

Since then, credit markets have become tighter and underwriting standards more stringent and the inability of purchasers of real estate to obtain financing could continue to impact the real estate market. Therefore, these loans may be subject to changes in grade, classification, accrual status, foreclosure, or loss, which could have an effect on the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses.

 

The Bank’s business is subject to various lending and other economic risks that could adversely impact its results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in economic conditions, particularly a continued economic slowdown in Fairfield County, Connecticut and the New York metropolitan area could result in the following consequences, any of which may have a material detrimental effect on the Bank’s business:

●

Increases in:

-

Loan delinquencies;

-

Problem assets and foreclosures; or

●

Decreases in:

-

Demand for the Bank’s products and services;

-

Customer borrowing power that is caused by declines in the value of assets and/or collateral supporting the Bank’s loans, especially real estate.

 

During the years 2007 through 2009, the general economic conditions and specific business conditions in the United States, including Fairfield County, Connecticut and the New York metropolitan area deteriorated, resulting in increases in loan delinquencies, problem assets and foreclosures, and declines in the value and collateral associated with the Bank’s loans.

 

During 2010 through 2020, however, the economic climate improved, contributing to decreases in the Bank’s problem assets, delinquencies and foreclosures from the levels experienced in the earlier period of economic turbulence. The Company is unable to predict, however, future economic conditions and their impact on the Company’s business.

 

 

The Bank’s allowance for loan and lease losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses.

Like all financial institutions, the Bank maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses to provide for loan defaults and non-performance. The allowance for loan and lease losses is based on an evaluation of the risks associated with the Bank’s loans receivable, as well as the Bank’s prior loss experience. Deterioration in general economic conditions and unforeseen risks affecting customers could have an adverse effect on borrowers’ capacity to timely repay their obligations before risk grades could reflect those changing conditions. Maintaining the adequacy of the Bank’s allowance for loan and lease losses may require that the Bank make significant and unanticipated increases in the provision for loan losses, which would materially affect the results of operations and capital adequacy. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating, and other conditions including changes in interest rates that may be beyond the Bank’s control and which losses may exceed current allowance estimates. Although the current economic environment has improved, conditions remain uncertain and may result in additional risk of loan losses.

 

Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, review the Bank’s loan portfolio and assess the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses. The regulatory agencies may require the Bank to change classifications or grades on loans, increase the allowance for loan and lease losses by recognizing additional loan loss provisions, or to recognize further loan charge-offs based upon their judgments, which may differ from the Bank’s. Any increase in the allowance for loan and lease losses required by these regulatory agencies could have a negative effect on the Bank’s results of operations and financial condition. While management believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses is currently adequate to cover inherent losses, further loan deterioration could occur, and therefore, management cannot assure shareholders that there will not be a need to increase the allowance for loan and lease losses, or that the regulators will not require management to increase this allowance. Either of these occurrences could materially and adversely affect Patriot’s earnings and profitability.

 

Patriot is subject to certain risks with respect to liquidity.

"Liquidity" refers to Patriot’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to support its operations and fulfill its obligations, including commitments by the Bank to originate loans, to repay its wholesale borrowings and other liabilities, and to satisfy the withdrawal of deposits by its customers.

 

Patriot’s primary sources of liquidity are the deposits the Bank acquires organically through its branch network and through the brokered deposit market, borrowed funds, primarily in the form of collateralized borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, and the cash flows generated through the collection of loan payments and on mortgage-related securities. In addition, depending on current market conditions, Patriot may have the ability to access the capital markets.

 

Deposit flows, calls of investment securities and wholesale borrowings, and prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities are strongly influenced by such external factors as the direction of interest rates, whether actual or perceived; local and national economic conditions; and competition for deposits and loans in the markets served. Furthermore, changes to the underwriting guidelines for wholesale borrowings, or lending policies may limit or restrict Patriot’s ability to borrow, and could therefore have a significant adverse impact on its liquidity. A decline in available funding could adversely impact Patriot’s ability to originate loans, invest in securities, and meet its expenses, or to fulfill such obligations as repaying its borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands.

 

The Bank’s business is subject to interest rate risk and variations in interest rates may negatively affect the Bank’s financial performance.

Patriot is unable to predict, with any degree of certainty, fluctuations of market interest rates, which are affected by many factors including inflation, recession, a rise in unemployment, a tightening money supply, domestic and international disorder, and instability in domestic and foreign financial markets. Changes in the interest rate environment may reduce Patriot’s profits. Patriot realizes income from the differential or “spread” between the interest earned on loans, securities, and other interest-earning assets and interest paid on deposits, borrowings, and other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest spreads are affected by the difference between the maturities and repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, an increase in the general level of interest rates may adversely affect the ability of some borrowers to pay the interest on and principal of their obligations. Although Patriot has implemented strategies which are designed to reduce the potential effects of changes in interest rates on operations, these strategies may not always be successful. Accordingly, changes in levels of market interest rates could materially and adversely affect Patriot’s net interest spread, asset quality, levels of prepayments, and cash flow, as well as the market value of its securities portfolio and overall profitability.

 

 

Patriot’s investment portfolio includes securities that are sensitive to interest rates and variations in interest rates may adversely impact Patriot’s profitability.

Patriot’s security portfolio is classified as available-for-sale and is comprised primarily of corporate debt and mortgage-backed securities, which are insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government. These securities are sensitive to interest rate fluctuations. Unrealized gains or losses in the available-for-sale portfolio of securities are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. As a result, future interest rate fluctuations may impact shareholders’ equity, causing material fluctuations from quarter to quarter. The inability to hold its securities until market conditions are favorable for a sale, or until payments are received on mortgage-backed securities, could adversely affect Patriot’s earnings and profitability.

 

Patriot is dependent on its locally-based management team and the loss of its senior executive officers or other key employees could impair its relationship with its customers and adversely affect its business and financial results.

The Bank’s success is dependent upon the continued services and skills of its long-term locally-based management team. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of these key personnel, because of their skills, knowledge of the Bank’s market, years of industry experience, and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel could have an adverse impact on the Bank’s business.

 

Patriot’s success also depends, in part, on its continued ability to attract and retain experienced commercial lenders and retail bankers, as well as other management personnel. The loss of services of several such key personnel could adversely affect Patriot’s growth and prospects, to the extent replacement personnel are not able to be identified and promptly retained. Competition for commercial lenders and retail bankers is strong, and Patriot may not be successful in retaining or attracting such personnel.

 

Natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, the impact of health epidemics and other adverse external events could detrimentally affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism, and other adverse external events could have a significant negative impact on our ability to conduct business or upon third parties who perform operational services for us or our customers. Such events also could affect the stability of our deposit base, impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in lost revenue or cause us to incur additional expenses.

 

The outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, has negatively impacted the ability of our employees and customers to engage in banking and other financial transactions in the geographic areas in which the Company operates. The Company also could be adversely affected if key personnel or a significant number of employees were to become unavailable due to a coronavirus outbreak in our market areas. Although the Company has business continuity plans and other safeguards in place, there is no assurance that such plans and safeguards will be effective. In the event of a natural disaster, the spread of the coronavirus to our market areas or other adverse external events, our business, services, asset quality, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

Patriot is subject to certain general affirmative debt covenants, which if it cannot comply, may result in default and actions taken against it by its debt holders.

On June 29, 2018, the Company entered into certain subordinated note purchase agreements with two institutional accredited investors and completed a private placement of $10 million of fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes with the maturity date of September 30, 2028 pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. Proceeds of $7.8 million were directly contributed to the Bank. The subordinated debt qualifies for Tier 2 Capital of the Company and the funds contributed to the Bank qualify as Tier 1 capital at the Bank.

 

In December 2016, the Company issued $12 million of senior notes (the “Senior Notes”) that contain certain affirmative covenants, which require the Company to: maintain its and its subsidiaries’ legal entity and tax status, pay its income tax obligations on a timely basis, and comply with SEC and FDIC reporting requirements. The Senior Notes are unsecured, rank equally with all other senior obligations of the Company, are not redeemable nor may they be put to the Company by the holders of the notes, and require no payment of principal until maturity date of December 22, 2021.

 

The affirmative covenants contained in the Senior Note agreements are of a general nature and not uncommon in such debt agreements. Management does not anticipate an inability to maintain its compliance with the affirmative covenants contained in the Senior Notes as such compliance is inherent in the Bank’s continued operation and Patriot’s public company status, as well as management’s overall strategic plan.

 

 

A breach of information security could negatively affect Patriot’s earnings.

Patriot increasingly depends upon data processing, communications, and information exchange on a variety of computing platforms and networks, and the internet to conduct its business. Patriot cannot be certain that all of its systems are entirely free from vulnerability to attack, despite safeguards it has instituted. In addition, Patriot relies on the services of a variety of vendors to meet its data processing and communication needs. If information security is breached, information can be lost or misappropriated and could result in financial loss or costs to Patriot, or damages to others. These financial losses or costs could materially exceed the amount of Patriot’s insurance coverage, if applicable, which would have an adverse effect on its results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the Bank’s reputation could suffer if its database were breached, which could materially affect Patriot’s financial condition and results of operations.

 

The Bank is subject to environmental liability risk associated with its lending activities.

A significant portion of the Bank’s loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, the Bank may foreclose on, and take title to, properties securing certain loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties, which may make Patriot liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. In addition, Patriot owns and operates certain properties that may be subject to similar environmental liability risks.

 

Environmental laws may require the Bank to incur substantial expense and may materially reduce the affected property's value, or limit the Bank’s ability to use or sell the affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase the Bank’s exposure to environmental liability. Although the Bank has policies and procedures requiring the performance of an environmental site assessment before loan approval or initiating any foreclosure action on real property, these assessments may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on Patriot’s financial condition and results of operations.

 

The Company relies on the dividends and return of capital it receives from its subsidiary.

The Company is a separate and distinct legal entity from the Bank. The Company’s primary source of revenue is the dividends or other returns of capital it receives from the Bank, which the Company uses to fund its activities, meet its obligations, and remit dividends to its shareholders. Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends or other returns of capital that a bank may pay to its parent company. In addition, the Company’s right to participate in a distribution of assets, upon liquidation or reorganization of the Bank or another regulated subsidiary, may be subordinate to claims by the Bank’s or subsidiary's creditors. If the Bank were to be restricted from making payments to the Company, the Company’s ability to fund its activities, meet its obligations, or pay dividends to its shareholders might be curtailed. The inability to receive payments from the Bank could therefore have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Per agreement with Bank regulators, dividends and return of capital from the Bank to the Holding Company are subject to prior approval from the OCC, and dividends from the Company to third parties are also subject to prior approval from FRB. There is no assurance that Company will pay dividends in the future.

 

The price of the Company’s common stock may fluctuate.

The market price of the Company’s common stock could be subject to significant fluctuations due to changes in sentiment in the market regarding the Company’s operations or business prospects. Among other factors, the Company’s stock price may be affected by:

	●	Operating results that vary from the expectations of securities analysts and investors;
	●	Developments in its business or in the financial services sector in-general;
	●	Regulatory or legislative changes affecting its business or the financial services sector in-general;
	●	Operating results or securities price performance of companies that investors consider being comparable to the Company;
	●	Changes in estimates or recommendations by securities analysts or rating agencies;
	●	Announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions, dispositions, financings, and other material events by the Company or the Company’s competitors; and
	●	Changes or volatility in global financial markets and economies, general market conditions, interest or foreign exchange rates, stock, commodity, credit, or asset valuations.

 

 

Difficult market conditions have adversely affected the Company’s industry.

The Company is exposed to general downturns in the U.S. economy, and particularly downturns in the local Connecticut and New York markets in which it operates. Two significant impacts resulting from the financial crisis included the housing market suffering falling home prices leading to increased foreclosures and our customer base experiencing rampant unemployment and sustained under-employment. These conditions negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage and construction loans, and resulted in significant asset-value write-downs by financial institutions, including government-sponsored enterprises, as well as major commercial and investment banks. The loss of mortgage and construction loan asset-value caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital, to merge with larger and financially stronger financial institutions and, in some cases, to fail. Many lenders and institutional investors reduced or ceased providing funding to borrowers, including other financial institutions. This market turmoil, and the tightening of credit by the Fed, led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence, increased market volatility, and generally widespread reductions in business activity. The resulting economic pressure on consumers and lack of confidence in the financial markets has adversely affected the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects these difficult market conditions have had on the Company and other financial institutions. In particular:

	●	Less than optimal economic conditions may continue to affect market confidence levels and may cause adverse changes in payment patterns, thereby causing increased delinquencies, which could affect the Bank’s provision for loan losses and charge-off of loans receivable.
	●	The ability to assess the creditworthiness of the Bank’s customers, or to accurately estimate loan collateral value, may be impaired if the models and approaches the Bank uses becomes less predictive of future behaviors, valuations, assumptions, or estimates due to the unpredictable economic climate.
	●	Increasing consolidation of financial services companies, as a result of current market conditions, could have unexpected adverse effects on the Bank’s ability to compete effectively.

 

The Bank may be required to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums, special assessments, or taxes that could adversely affect its earnings.

Market developments have significantly impacted the insurance fund of the FDIC. As a result, the Bank may be required to pay higher premiums, or special assessments, that could adversely affect earnings. The amount of premiums the FDIC requires for the insurance coverage it provides is outside the Bank’s control. If there are additional banks or financial institution failures, the Bank may be required to pay higher FDIC premiums than are currently assessed. Increases in FDIC insurance premiums, including any future increases or required prepayments, may materially adversely affect the Bank’s results of operations.

 

Patriot is subject to risks associated with taxation.

The amount of income taxes Patriot is required to pay on its earnings is based on federal and state legislation and regulations. Patriot provides for current and deferred taxes in its financial statements, based on the results of operations, business activity, legal structure, interpretation of tax statutes, assessment of risk of adjustment upon audit, and application of financial accounting standards. Patriot may take tax return filing positions for which the final determination of tax is uncertain. Patriot’s net income or loss and the related amount per share may be reduced, if a federal, state, or local tax authority assesses additional taxes, penalties, or interest that has not been provided for in the consolidated financial statements. Patriot’s equity position and net income or loss can also be reduced if all or apportion of its deferred tax assets are deemed to be unrealizable and require a valuation allowance. There can be no assurance that Patriot will achieve its anticipated effective tax rate, due to a change in a tax law, or the result of a tax audit that disallows previously recognized tax benefits.

 

Risks associated with changes in technology.

Financial products and services have become increasingly technology-driven. The Bank’s ability to compete for new and meet the needs of existing customers, in a cost-efficient manner, is dependent on its ability to keep pace with technological advances and to invest in new technology as it becomes available. Many of the Bank’s competitors have greater resources to invest in technology and may be better equipped to market new technology-driven products and services. Failing to keep pace with technological change could have a material adverse impact on the Bank’s business and therefore on Patriot’s financial condition and results of operations.

 

 

Strong competition in Patriot’s geographical market could limit growth and profitability.

Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. Fairfield County, Connecticut and the New York City metropolitan areas have a high concentration of financial institutions including large money center and regional banks, community banks, and credit unions. Some of Patriot’s competitors offer products and services that the Bank currently does not offer, such as private banking and trust services. Many of these competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits than the Bank, and may offer certain services that Patriot does not or cannot provide. Price competition might result in the Bank earning less on its loans and paying more for deposits, which would reduce net interest income. Patriot expects competition to increase in the future, as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes. Patriot’s profitability depends upon its continued ability to successfully compete in its geographical market.

 

Government regulation may have an adverse effect on Patriot’s profitability and growth.

Patriot is subject to extensive regulation, supervision, and examination by the OCC as the Bank’s chartering authority, the FDIC as the insurer of its deposits, and the Fed as its primary regulator. Changes in federal and state banking laws and regulations, or in federal monetary policies, could adversely affect the Bank’s profitability and continued growth. Legislative and regulatory changes are expected, but cannot be predicted. For example, new legislation or regulation could limit the manner in which Patriot may conduct its business, including the Bank’s ability to obtain financing, attract deposits, make loans, and achieve satisfactory interest spreads. The laws, regulations, interpretations, and enforcement policies that apply to Patriot have been subject to significant, and sometimes retroactively applied, changes in recent years, and are likely to change significantly in the future.

 

Legislation enacted by the U.S. Congress, proposing significant structural reforms to the financial services industry, has, among other things, created the CFPB, which is given broad authority to regulate financial service providers and financial products. In addition, the Fed has passed guidance on incentive compensation at financial institutions it regulates and the United States Department of the Treasury and federal banking regulators have issued statements calling for higher capital and liquidity requirements. Complying with any new legislative or regulatory requirements and any programs established thereunder by federal and state governments, could have an adverse impact on Patriot’s operations and the results thereof.

 

Changing regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure.

Patriot is subject to laws, regulations, and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, SEC rules and regulations, and NASDAQ rules. These laws, regulations, and standards are subject to varying interpretations, and as a result, their practical application may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. Due to the evolving legal and regulatory environment, compliance may become more difficult and result in higher costs. Patriot is committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, Patriot’s efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Patriot’s reputation may be harmed, if it does not continue to comply with these laws, regulations and standards.

 

The earnings of financial institutions are significantly affected by general business and economic conditions.

As a financial institution, Patriot’s operations and profitability are impacted by general business and economic conditions in the United States and abroad. These conditions include short- and long-term interest rates, inflation, money supply, political issues, legislative and regulatory changes, and the overall strength of the U.S. economy and the local economies in which it operates, all of which conditions are beyond Patriot’s control. In recent years, the financial services industry has experienced unprecedented upheaval, including the failure of some of the World’s leading financial institutions. Further deterioration in economic conditions could result in an increase in loan delinquencies and non-performing assets, decreases in loan collateral values, and a decrease in demand for the Bank’s products and services, among other things, any of which could have a material adverse impact on Patriot’s results of operations and financial condition. Patriot cannot currently predict or implement plans to mitigate the effects of unknown future industry developments.

 

 

The Company is a “Controlled Company” within the meaning of the NASDAQ U.S. Market Rules and Regulations and, as a result, the Company qualifies for, and relies on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements.

Holdings controls a majority of the Company’s voting common stock. As a result, the Company is a “Controlled Company” within the meaning of Nasdaq corporate governance standards. Under the Nasdaq Rules and Regulations, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is considered a “Controlled Company”, which may utilize exemptions relating to certain Nasdaq corporate governance requirements, including:

	●	Requiring the Board of Directors to be comprised of a majority of Independent Directors (as defined);
	●	The requirement that the Company have a Nominating and Governance Committee that is composed entirely of independent directors;
	●	The requirement that the Company have a Compensation Committee that is composed entirely of independent directors; and
	●	The requirement for an annual review and reassess the adequacy of the formal written charter Compensation Committee.

 

As a result of these exemptions, the Company does have an annual review and reassess the adequacy of the formal written charter of the Compensation Committee and may elect to rely on other exemptions. Accordingly, a holder of its common stock will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NASDAQ corporate governance requirements.

 

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and measures intended to prevent its spread could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, and such effects will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and are difficult to predict.

Global health concerns relating to the COVID-19 outbreak and related government actions taken to reduce the spread of the virus have been weighing on the macroeconomic environment, and the outbreak has significantly increased economic uncertainty and reduced economic activity. The outbreak has resulted in authorities implementing numerous measures to try to contain the virus, such as travel bans and restrictions, quarantines, shelter in place or total lock-down orders and business limitations and shutdowns. Such measures have significantly contributed to rising unemployment and negatively impacted consumer and business spending. The United States government has taken steps to attempt to mitigate some of the more severe anticipated economic effects of the virus, including the passage of the CARES Act, but there can be no assurance that such steps will be effective or achieve their desired results in a timely fashion.

 

The outbreak has adversely impacted and is likely to further adversely impact our operations and the operations of our borrowers, customers and business partners. In particular, we may experience financial losses due to a number of operational factors impacting us or our borrowers, customers or business partners, including but not limited to:

	●	credit losses resulting from financial stress being experienced by our borrowers as a result of the outbreak and related governmental actions, particularly in the hospitality, energy, retail and restaurant industries, but across other industries as well;
	●	declines in collateral values;
	●	third party disruptions, including outages at network providers and other suppliers;
	●	increased cyber and payment fraud risk, as cybercriminals attempt to profit from the disruption, given increased online and remote activity; and
	●	operational failures due to changes in our normal business practices necessitated by the outbreak and related governmental actions.

 

These factors may remain prevalent for a significant period of time and may continue to adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition even after the COVID-19 outbreak has subsided.

 

The extent to which the coronavirus outbreak impacts our business, results of operations and financial condition will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and are difficult to predict, including, but not limited to, the duration and spread of the outbreak, its severity, the actions to contain the virus or treat its impact, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume.

 

 

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act

 

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, President Trump signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act on March 27, 2020. Among other things, the CARES Act included the following provisions impacting financial institutions:

 

Legal Lending Limit Waiver. The CARES Act permits the OCC to waive legal lending limits to any particular borrower (i) with respect to loans to non-bank financial companies or (ii) upon a finding by the OCC that such exemption is in the public interest, with respect to any other borrower, in each case until the earlier of the termination date of the national emergency or December 31, 2020.

 

Community Bank Leverage Ratio. The CARES Act directs federal banking agencies to adopt interim final rules to lower the threshold under the CBLR from 9% to 8% and to provide a reasonable grace period for a community bank that falls below the threshold to regain compliance, in each case until the earlier of the termination date of the national emergency or December 31, 2020. In April 2020, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued two interim final rules implementing this directive. One interim final rule provides that, as of the second quarter 2020, banking organizations with leverage ratios of 8% or greater (and that meet the other existing qualifying criteria) may elect to use the CBLR framework. It also establishes a two-quarter grace period for qualifying community banking organizations whose leverage ratios fall below the 8% CBLR requirement, so long as the banking organization maintains a leverage ratio of 7% or greater. The second interim final rule provides a transition from the temporary 8% CBLR requirement to a 9% CBLR requirement. It establishes a minimum CBLR of 8% for the second through fourth quarters of 2020, 8.5% for 2021, and 9% thereafter, and maintains a two-quarter grace period for qualifying community banking organizations whose leverage ratios fall no more than 100 basis points below the applicable CBLR requirement.

 

Temporary Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) Relief. The CARES Act allows banks to elect to suspend requirements under U.S. GAAP for loan modifications related to the COVID-19 pandemic (for loans that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019) that would otherwise be categorized as a TDR, including impairment for accounting purposes, until the earlier of 60 days after the termination date of the national emergency or December 31, 2020. Federal banking agencies are required to defer to the determination of the banks making such suspension. In addition, on April 7, 2020, a group of banking regulatory agencies issued a revised interagency statement that offers practical expedients for evaluating whether COVID-19 loan modifications are TDRs.

 

Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program. The CARES Act created the SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program. Under the Paycheck Protection Program, $669 billion was authorized for small business loans to pay payroll and group health costs, salaries and commissions, mortgage and rent payments, utilities, and interest on other debt. The loans are provided through participating financial institutions that process loan applications and service the loans. The Bank started participating in the SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program in January 2021.

 

The Fed has taken, and continues to take, steps to support markets and the economy. Stimulus from Washington and the federal government, in spite of political hurdles and a change in presidential administrations, has also provided meaningful support. The new Biden administration has proposed another $1.9 trillion stimulus package that is currently making its way through Congress. The market expects the Fed Funds rate to remain at the effective lower bound near zero for an extended period of time. Henceforth, the Fed appears to be willing to let inflation run above the 2% target level, even when unemployment is very low, before removing accommodation.

 

ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

 

 

ITEM 2. Properties

 

The following table summarizes Patriot’s owned and leased properties, as of December 31, 2020:

 

Street Address		City		County		State
Owned:
233 Post Road		Darien		Fairfield		Connecticut
1755 Black Rock Turnpike		Fairfield		Fairfield		Connecticut
100 Mason Street		Greenwich		Fairfield		Connecticut
900 Bedford Street		Stamford		Fairfield		Connecticut
999 Bedford Street		Stamford		Fairfield		Connecticut
771 Boston Post Road		Milford		New Haven		Connecticut
50 Charles Street		Westport		Fairfield		Connecticut
50 Church Street		New Haven		New Haven		Connecticut
Leased:
16 River Street		Norwalk		Fairfield		Connecticut
415 Post Road East		Westport		Fairfield		Connecticut
495 Central Park Avenue		Scarsdale		Westchester		New York
7 Old Tavern Road		Orange		New Haven		Connecticut
30 Oak Street		Stamford		Fairfield		Connecticut
300 Centerville Rd		Warwick		Kent County		Rhode Island

 

At December 31, 2020, five branch buildings were owned and four branch facilities were leased. Additionally, the Bank maintains certain operating and administrative service facilities and additional parking at its main branch banking office, which is subject to ten non-cancelable operating lease agreements. Patriot’s lease agreements have terms ranging from one year to fifteen years with eleven years and seven months remaining on the longest lease term. Generally, Patriot’s lease agreements contain rent escalation clauses, and renewals for one or more periods at the Bank’s option.

 

On May 10, 2018, the Bank completed its acquisition of Prime Bank. The closing of the transaction added a new Patriot branch located in the Town of Orange, New Haven County, Connecticut.

 

On February 28, 2018, the Bedford branch was closed, and its business and staff transferred to the Scarsdale branch.

 

At three of its branch buildings, the Bank has excess space that it leases to seven unrelated parties.

 

For additional information, see the Leases footnote disclosure in the consolidated financial statements included herein.

 

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings

 

Other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business, neither the Company nor the Bank has any pending legal proceedings to which the Company or the Bank is a party or any of its property is subject.

 

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.

 

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Market Information

The Company’s Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the Symbol “PNBK.”

 

Holders

There were approximately 277 shareholders of record of the Company’s Common Stock as of December 31, 2020. This number does not reflect the number of persons or entities holding stock in nominee name through banks, brokerage firms or other nominees.

 

Dividends

The Company’s ability to pay dividends is dependent on the Bank’s ability to pay dividends or execute a return of capital to the Company. The Bank can make payments to the Company pursuant to a dividend policy requiring compliance with the Bank's OCC-approved capital program, in compliance with applicable law, and with the prior written determination of no supervisory objection by the Assistant Deputy Comptroller. In addition to the capital program, certain other restrictions exist regarding the ability of the Bank to transfer funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances. The approval of the OCC is required to make payments in excess of the Bank’s earnings retained in the current year plus retained net earnings for the preceding two years. The Company is also prohibited from paying dividends that would reduce its capital ratios below minimum regulatory requirements. OCC regulations impose limitations upon all capital distributions by commercial institutions, like the Bank, such as dividends, returns of capital, and payments to repurchase or otherwise acquire shares. The Company may not declare or pay cash dividends on or repurchase any of its shares of common stock, if the effect thereof would cause stockholders’ equity to be reduced below applicable regulatory capital maintenance requirements, or if such declaration and payments would otherwise violate regulatory requirements.

 

The Company did not pay any dividends in 2020 and has temporarily suspended dividend payments pending resolution of the economic uncertainties associated with the Coronavirus pandemic. For the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company paid cash dividends of $.01 per share of common stock, or an aggregate of $155,000 and $154,000, respectively. There is no assurance that Company will pay dividends in the future.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

No sales of unregistered securities were entered in 2020 and 2019.

 

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

 

 

Performance Graph

The performance graph compares the Company’s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock over the last five fiscal years to the NASDAQ Community Bank Total Return Index and the S&P 500 Total Return Index. Total shareholder return is measured by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period (assuming dividend reinvestment) and the Company’s share price at the end of the measurement period, by the share price at the beginning of the measurement period.

 

 

 

		Period Ending
		2015				2016				2017				2018				2019				2020
Patriot National Bancorp ("PNBK")			100.00	%			96.56	%			122.68	%			97.94	%			87.70	%			68.32	%
Nasdaq Community Bank Index Total Return Index ("XABQ")			100.00	%			135.02	%			139.77	%			114.74	%			139.10	%			124.31	%
S&P 500 Total Return Index ("SP500TR")			100.00	%			111.96	%			136.40	%			130.42	%			171.49	%			203.04	%

 

 

ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data

 

(In thousands, except per share data)		As of and for the year ended December 31,
		2020				2019				2018				2017				2016
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and due from banks		$	34,636			$	39,404			$	66,437			$	48,729			$	92,289
Investment securities			53,712				52,767				52,253				38,929				36,596
Loans, net			719,596				802,049				772,767				713,350				576,982
Total assets			880,729				979,836				951,696				852,080				756,654
Total deposits			685,656				769,535				743,281				637,439				529,324
Total borrowings			120,813				130,900				130,983				141,369				159,476
Total shareholders' equity			63,219				66,994				69,340				66,749				62,570
Operating Data:
Interest and dividend income		$	37,903			$	43,644			$	40,375			$	32,849			$	25,408
Interest expense			13,750				18,218				12,378				6,956				3,008
Net interest income			24,153				25,426				27,997				25,893				22,400
Provision (credit) for loan losses			2,170				4,971				1,303				(857	)			2,464
Non-interest income			1,979				2,483				1,627				1,444				1,556
Non-interest expense			28,118				26,654				24,235				21,172				18,355
(Benefit) provision for income taxes			(337	)			(899	)			890				2,875				1,207
Net (loss) income		$	(3,819	)		$	(2,817	)		$	3,196			$	4,147			$	1,930
Per Share Data:
Basic (loss) income per share		$	(0.97	)		$	(0.72	)		$	0.82			$	1.06			$	0.49
Diluted (loss) income per share		$	(0.97	)		$	(0.72	)		$	0.82			$	1.06			$	0.49
Selected Ratios:
Return on average assets			(0.40	)%			(0.29	)%			0.35	%			0.54	%			0.30	%
Return on average equity			(5.82	)%			(4.05	)%			4.64	%			6.32	%			3.08	%
Average equity to average assets			6.86	%			7.18	%			7.63	%			8.48	%			9.83	%

 

 

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis - Financial Condition & Results of Operations

 

General

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to assist in understanding the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting and reporting policies of Patriot conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and to general practices within the financial services industry. A summary of Patriot’s significant accounting policies is included in the Notes to consolidated financial statements that are referenced in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Although all of Patriot’s policies are integral to understanding its consolidated financial statements, certain accounting policies involve management to exercise judgment, develop assumptions, and make estimates that may have a material impact on the financial information presented in the consolidated financial statements or Notes thereto. The assumptions and estimates are based on historical experience and other factors representing the best available information to management as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, up to and including the date of issuance or availability for issuance. As the basis for the assumptions and estimates incorporated in the consolidated financial statements may change, as new information comes to light, the consolidated financial statements could reflect different assumptions and estimates.

 

Due to the judgments, assumptions, and estimates inherent in the following policies, management considers such accounting policies critical to an understanding of the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL)

The Company maintains an ALLL at a level management believes is sufficient to absorb estimated credit losses incurred as of the report date. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the ALLL is based on periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio and other relevant factors. However, this evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires significant estimates by management. As applicable, consideration is given to a variety of factors in establishing these estimates including historical losses, peer and industry data, current economic conditions, the size and composition of the loan portfolio, delinquency statistics, criticized and classified assets and impaired loans, results of internal loan reviews, borrowers’ perceived financial and management strengths, the adequacy of underlying collateral, the dependence on collateral, and the strength of the present value of future cash flows and other relevant factors. These factors may be susceptible to significant change. 

 

To the extent actual outcomes differ from management’s estimates, additional provisions for loan losses may be required, which may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations in the future. Subsequent to acquisition of purchased-credit-impaired loans, estimates of cash flows expected to be collected are updated each reporting period based on updated assumptions regarding default rates, loss severities, and other factors that are reflective of current market conditions. Subsequent decreases in expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses; subsequent increases in expected cash flows may result in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior charges.

 

Unrealized Gains and Losses on Securities Available-for-sale

The Company receives estimated fair values of debt securities from independent valuation services and brokers. In developing these fair values, the valuation services and brokers use estimates of cash flows based on historical performance of similar instruments in similar rate environments. Available-for-sale debt securities consist primarily of mortgage-backed securities that are guaranteed by the U.S. government. The Company uses various indicators in determining whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired including, for debt securities, when it is probable that the contractual interest and principal will not be collected, or for equity securities, whether the market value is below its cost for an extended period of time with low expectation of recovery. The debt securities are monitored for changes in credit ratings because adverse changes in credit ratings could indicate a change in the estimated cash flows of the underlying collateral or issuer. The Company also considers the volatility of a security’s price in comparison to the market as a whole and any recoveries or declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date. If management determines that the impairment is other-than-temporary, the entire amount of the impairment, as of the balance sheet date, is recognized in earnings, even if the decision to sell the security has not been made.

 

 

The fair value of the security becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment and is not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value. Available-for-sale debt securities were not considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 2020, 2019, or 2018 because the unrealized losses were related to changes in interest rates and did not affect the expected cash flows to be received, or indicate a loss of value on the underlying collateral, or a loss of financial stability on the part of the issuer. Management concluded that the declines in fair value of the investment portfolio as of the reporting dates is temporary and that values would recover by way of increases in market price or positive changes in market interest rates.

 

Deferred Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax laws is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

 

Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that are more likely than not expected to be realized based on the weighting of positive and negative evidence. Future realization of deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character (for example, ordinary income or capital gain) within the carryback or carryforward periods available under the applicable tax law. The Company regularly reviews the deferred tax assets for recoverability based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning strategies. The Company’s judgments regarding future profitability may change due to many factors, including future market conditions and the ability to successfully execute its business plans. Should there be a change in the ability to recover deferred tax assets, the tax provision would increase or decrease in the period in which the assessment is changed.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is recognized as an asset and is to be reviewed for impairment annually and between annual tests when events and circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. Impairment is a condition that exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.

 

Intangible assets, other than goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, are amortized to expense over their estimated useful lives in a manner consistent with that in which the related benefits are expected to be realized, and are periodically reviewed by management to assess recoverability. Impairment losses on other intangibles are recognized as a charge to expense if carrying amounts exceed fair values.

 

Servicing Assets

A servicing asset related to SBA loans is initially recorded when these loans are sold and the servicing rights are retained. The servicing asset is recorded on the balance sheet and included in other assets. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions. Impairment is evaluated based on stratifying the underlying financial assets by date of origination and term. Any impairment, if temporary, would be reported as a valuation allowance.

 

Derivatives

The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements (“swaps”), to provide a facility to mitigate for the borrower the fluctuations in the variable rate on the respective loan. The customer swaps are simultaneously hedge by offsetting derivatives that Patriot entered into with an outside third party. The swaps are reported at fair value in other assets or other liabilities. Patriot’s swaps qualify as derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments, thus any net gain or loss resulting from changes in the fair value is recognized in other noninterest income.

 

 

FINANCIAL CONDITION

 

Assets

The Company’s total assets decreased $99.1 million, or 10.1%, from $979.8 million at December 31, 2019 to $880.7 million at December 31, 2020. The decline in total assets represents the intentional downsizing of the Bank’s balance sheet as the current economic uncertainties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic are assessed.

 

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents have decreased $4.8 million or 12.2%, from $39.4 million at December 31, 2019 to $34.6 million as of December 31, 2020. The decrease as of December 31, 2020 was primarily attributable to net decrease in loan portfolio through paydown of the loans and net decrease in deposits - both of which are currently invested in short term cash positions. The Company’s liquidity position is strong with liquid assets rising to 9.0% of total assets as of December 31, 2020.

 

Investment securities

The following table is a summary of the Company’s available-for-sale securities portfolio and other investments at the dates shown:

 

(In thousands)		December 31,
		2020				2019				2018
U. S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities		$	16,833			$	16,685			$	20,473
Corporate bonds			17,290				17,313				12,974
Subordinated notes			9,005				9,204				4,564
SBA loan pools			5,567				5,115				-
Municipal bonds			567				-				-
U.S. Treasury notes			-				-				1,485
Total Available-for-Sale Securities, at fair value			49,262				48,317				39,496
Other Investments, at cost			4,450				4,450				4,963
		$	53,712			$	52,767			$	44,459

 

Total investments increased $945,000 or 1.8%, from $52.8 million at December 31, 2019 to $53.7 million at December 31, 2020. This increase was primarily attributable to the purchases of $9.0 million U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities, $1.6 million SBA loan pools and $565,000 municipal bonds, which was offset by $9.9 million in repayments of principal on available-for-sale securities. There were no sales of available-for-sales securities during the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

Loans held for investment

The following table provides the composition of the Company’s loan held for investment portfolio as of December 31, for each of the years shown:

 

		December 31,
(In thousands)		2020								2019								2018
		Amount				%				Amount				%				Amount				%
Loan portfolio segment:
Commercial Real Estate		$	282,378				38.68	%		$	314,414				38.71	%		$	274,938				35.23	%
Residential Real Estate			153,851				21.07	%			175,489				21.61	%			157,300				20.16	%
Commercial and Industrial			144,297				19.76	%			173,875				21.41	%			191,852				24.58	%
Consumer and Other			67,635				9.26	%			85,934				10.58	%			94,569				12.12	%
Construction			66,984				9.17	%			48,388				5.96	%			46,040				5.90	%
Construction to permanent - CRE			15,035				2.06	%			14,064				1.73	%			15,677				2.01	%
Loans receivable, gross			730,180				100.00	%			812,164				100.00	%			780,376				100.00	%
Allowance for loan losses			(10,584	)							(10,115	)							(7,609	)
Loans receivable, net		$	719,596							$	802,049							$	772,767

 

 

The gross loans receivable decreased $82.0 million or 10.1%, from $812.2 million at December 31, 2019 to $730.2 million at December 31, 2020. The decrease in loans was primarily attributable to $116.6 million net paydown of the loans which was partially offset by internal loan originations, $32.8 million in purchases of loans receivable and $9.5 million transfer of SBA loans held for sale to loans held for investment during 2020.

 

Patriot originates SBA 7(a) loans, on which the SBA has historically provided guarantees of 75 percent of the principal balance. The guaranteed portion of the Company’s SBA loans is generally sold in the secondary market with the unguaranteed portion held in the portfolio as a loan held for investment.

 

SBA loans held for investment were included in the commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial loan classifications above. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, SBA loans included in the commercial real estate loans were $5.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively. SBA loans included in the commercial and industrial loan were $15.9 million and $5.6 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2020, the net loan to deposit ratio was 105% and the net loan to total assets ratio was 82%. At December 31, 2019, these ratios were 104% and 82%, respectively.

 

Maturities and Sensitivities of Loans to Changes in Interest Rates

The following table presents loans receivable, gross by portfolio segment, by contractual maturity as of December 31, 2020:

 

		Contractual Maturity of Loan Balance
(In thousands)		One year or less				One through Five Years				After Five Years				Total
Loan portfolio segment:
Commercial Real Estate		$	44,000			$	60,807			$	177,571			$	282,378
Residential Real Estate			3,651				4,121				146,079				153,851
Commercial and Industrial			31,440				72,543				40,314				144,297
Consumer and Other			1,065				3,640				62,930				67,635
Construction			55,795				10,997				192				66,984
Construction to permanent - CRE			-				724				14,311				15,035
Total		$	135,951			$	152,832			$	441,397			$	730,180
Fixed rate loans		$	15,881			$	38,385			$	121,143			$	175,409
Variable rate loans			120,070				114,447				320,254				554,771
Total		$	135,951			$	152,832			$	441,397			$	730,180

 

All variable rate loans account for 76.0% of the total loan portfolio. Approximately 39.6% of the loan portfolio is variable rate and reprices with changes in interest rates within three months of the rate change. The balance of the loan portfolio is either fixed rate or variable over a longer period of rate change (for example, adjustable-rate mortgage loans are generally fixed for 3-5 years and then reprice annually after the fixed period). These repricing characteristics are reflected in the Bank’s aggregate analysis of net interest sensitivity included in Item 7A. of this report.

 

As a community bank, the Bank is invested in a local economy, which may be subject to the vagaries of general economic conditions. The existing conditions have led an investment in the loan portfolio weighted to Commercial Real Estate and Commercial and Industrial, which accounts for 58.4% of total loans receivable. These loans generally are collateralized by the underlying real estate and supported by personal guarantees of the borrowers.

 

 

Allowance for loan and lease losses

The allowance for loan and lease losses increased $469,000 from $10.1 million at December 31, 2019 to $10.6 million at December 31, 2020. The increase was primarily attributable to a provision for loan losses of $2.2 million and an additional reserve related to the COVID-19 pandemic for the year ended December 31, 2020, which was partially offset by $1.8 million charge-offs.

 

Based upon the overall assessment and evaluation of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2020, management believes the allowance for loan and lease losses of $10.6 million, which represents 1.45% of gross loans outstanding, was adequate under prevailing economic conditions to absorb existing losses in the loan portfolio.

 

The following table provides detail of activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses:

 

		Year ended December 31,
(In thousands)		2020				2019				2018
Balance at beginning of the period		$	10,115			$	7,609			$	6,297
Charge-offs:
Commercial Real Estate			(1,032	)			-				-
Residential Real Estate			(24	)			(118	)			(2	)
Commercial and Industrial			(677	)			(2,418	)			-
Consumer and Other			(45	)			(123	)			(33	)
Total charge-offs			(1,778	)			(2,659	)			(35	)
Recoveries:
Commercial Real Estate			-				2				7
Residential Real Estate			1				10				2
Commercial and Industrial			70				172				34
Consumer and Other			6				10				1
Total recoveries			77				194				44
Net (charge-offs) recoveries			(1,701	)			(2,465	)			9
Provision charged to earnings			2,170				4,971				1,303
Balance at end of the period		$	10,584			$	10,115			$	7,609
Ratios:
Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average loans			(0.215	)%			(0.305	)%			0.001	%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans			1.45	%			1.25	%			0.98	%

 

The following table provides an allocation of allowance for loan and lease losses by portfolio segment as of December 31, for each of the years shown:

 

		December 31,
(In thousands)		2020								2019								2018
		Allowance for loan losses				% of loans				Allowance for loan losses				% of loans				Allowance for loan losses				% of loans
Commercial Real Estate		$	4,485				42.37	%		$	3,789				37.45	%		$	1,866				24.53	%
Residential Real Estate			1,379				13.03	%			1,038				10.26	%			1,059				13.92	%
Commercial and Industrial			3,284				31.03	%			4,340				42.91	%			3,558				46.76	%
Consumer and Other			295				2.79	%			341				3.37	%			641				8.42	%
Construction			739				6.98	%			477				4.72	%			350				4.60	%
Construction to permanent - CRE			162				1.53	%			130				1.29	%			108				1.42	%
Unallocated			240				2.27	%			-				0.00	%			27				0.35	%
Total		$	10,584				100.00	%		$	10,115				100.00	%		$	7,609				100.00	%

 

 

Nonperforming Assets

The following table presents non-accrual and accruing loans which were past due by over 90 days for the dates indicated:

 

(In thousands)		December 31,
		2020				2019				2018
Non-accruing loans:
Commercial Real Estate		$	14,534			$	11,961			$	3,525
Residential Real Estate			3,854				3,228				2,006
Commercial and Industrial			700				2,094				4,681
Consumer and Other			917				766				174
Construction			-				-				8,800
Total non-accruing loans			20,005				18,049				19,186
Loans past due over 90 days and still accruing			16				19				1,316
Other real estate owned			1,906				2,400				2,945
Total nonperforming assets		$	21,927			$	20,468			$	23,447
Nonperforming assets to total assets			2.49	%			2.09	%			2.46	%
Nonperforming loans to total loans, net			2.78	%			2.25	%			2.65	%

 

Non-accrual loans increased $2.0 million, from $18.0 million at December 31, 2019 to $20.0 million at December 31, 2020. The $20.0 million of non-accrual loans at December 31, 2020 was comprised of 21 borrowers, for which a specific reserve of $1.4 million was established. Six TDR loans of total $11.5 million were included in the non-accrual loans. For collateral dependent loans, the Bank has obtained appraisal reports from independent licensed appraisal firms and discounted those values based on the Bank’s experience selling OREO properties and for estimated selling costs to determine estimated impairment. For cash flow dependent loans, the Bank determined the reserve based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate. The Bank evaluated the impaired loans individually and determined that a specific reserve of $1.4 million was established as of December 31, 2020.

 

As of December 31, 2019, the $18.0 million of non-accrual loans was comprised of 27 borrowers, for which a specific reserve of $1.5 million has been established. Two TDR loans of total $9.3 million were included in the non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2019.

 

Loans held for sale

Loans held for sale are made up of SBA loans which totaled $1.2 million and $15.3 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

 

SBA loans are originated under the U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA") 7(a) program. Loans made by the Bank under the SBA 7(a) program generally are made to small businesses to provide working capital or to provide funding for the purchase of businesses, real estate, or equipment. SBA loans are made based primarily on the historical and projected cash flow of the business and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided.

 

Under the SBA 7(a) program the loans generally carry a SBA guaranty for 75% of the loan. The Bank can sell the guaranteed portion in the secondary market and retain and hold for investment the related unguaranteed portion of these loans, as well as the servicing on such loans, for which it is paid a fee. SBA loans held for investment are included in the commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial loan classifications.

 

Patriot sells the guaranteed portion of SBA loans for liquidity purposes and to generate non-interest income. Loans held for sale represent the guaranteed portion of SBA loans and are reflected at the lower of aggregate cost or market value. Loans held for sale at December 31, 2020, consisted entirely of $1.2 million SBA commercial and industrial loans. SBA loans held for sale at December 31, 2019, consisted of $10.2 million SBA commercial and industrial loans and $5.1 million SBA commercial real estate, respectively. The decrease in SBA loans held for sale was primarily due to $9.5 million transfer of SBA loans held for sale to held for investment, and sale of SBA loans in 2020. The Company sold $6.6 million SBA loans during the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to $12.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

In September 2020, one commercial and industry loan of $5.0 million was reclassified from loans held for investment to loans held for sale. The loan was sold in October 2020 which resulted in proceeds of $5.0 million.

 

 

Premises and equipment

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, Patriot recorded premises and equipment, net of $33.4 million and $34.6 million, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to normal depreciation of the active premises and equipment during the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

Management continuously reviews its branch locations and corporate offices to improve penetration in targeted markets and increase operating efficiencies.

 

Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”)

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, Patriot recorded OREO of $1.9 million and $2.4 million on the consolidated balance sheet, respectively. The 2020 OREO balance consisted of foreclosed residential properties from one loan receivable that is currently being marketed for sale as two properties. In 2020, Patriot sold one OREO of $446,000 and recognized a loss of $21,000. There was a write-down of $48,000 for the remaining OREO as of December 31, 2020, which is included in the non-interest expense on the consolidated statements of operations. In 2019, Patriot sold one OREO of $991,000 acquired from Prime Bank merger in May 2018 and recognized a loss of $94,000.

 

Goodwill

The Company completed its acquisition of Prime Bank in May 2018, and recorded $1.7 million of goodwill at December 31, 2018. The goodwill was adjusted to $1.1 million as a result of reducing by $621,000 the estimated amount to be paid pursuant to certain problem loans pending resolution as of May 10, 2019. As of December 31, 2020, Patriot reported an expense of $556,000 in the fourth quarter of 2020 based on an arbitrator letter that finalized a dispute relating to the determination of the final purchase price. The adjustment was recoded to the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company performed its annual review of the goodwill as of December 31, 2020 and determined that there was no impairment of the goodwill.

 

Core deposit intangible (“CDI”)

Core deposit intangible (“CDI”) was recorded as part of the Prime Bank business combination in May 2018. The CDI is amortized over a 10-year period using the straight-line method. CDI decreased $280,000 from $623,000 at December 31, 2019 to $343,000 at December 31, 2020. The Company performed a review of the CDI as of October 31, 2020 and determined that there was an impairment charge of $206,000 of the CDI due to the decline in the interest rates in 2020. The amortization of the CDI was $74,000 and $75,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

 

 

Deferred Taxes

As of December 31, 2020, Patriot had available approximately $21.8 million of Federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOL”) that are offset by $15.5 million in Internal Revenue Code §382 limitations. Of the NOL of $21.8 million, approximately $20.2 million will expire between 2030 and 2033 and $1.56 million does not expire. For the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Bank recorded an uncertain tax position (“UTP”) of $0 and $1.1 million related to the utilization of certain federal net operating losses, respectively.

 

Additionally, Patriot has approximately $55.8 million of NOLs available for Connecticut tax purposes at December 31, 2020, which may be used to offset up to 50% of taxable income in any year. The NOLs expire between 2030 and 2039.

 

As of December 31, 2020, Patriot had a $11.5 million deferred tax asset, comprised of multiple temporary differences, in addition to the previously aforementioned NOLs. The assessment of the potential realizability of the deferred tax assets is based on observation of the condition and future of the Bank, including:

	●	Cumulative pre-tax profit over the last three years, exclusive of an isolated fraud-related loss in 2019;
	●	Forecasted taxable income for 2021 and future periods;
	●	Historical average pre-tax income over the last four years adjusted for the fraud loss and other non-recurring expenses relating to merger and acquisition activity, and a reduced cost of funds now reflected in its most recent quarterly results;
	●	Improvements in operations and cost management; and
	●	Net operating loss carry-forwards that do not begin to expire until 2030.

 

After weighing both positive and negative evidence, Patriot recorded a valuation allowance of $1.9 million. Patriot will continue to evaluate its ability to realize its net deferred tax assets. If future evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, an additional valuation allowance will be established. As deferred tax assets associated with NOL carryforwards are already a direct reduction to Tier 1 Capital, the valuation allowance at December 31, 2020 had no impact on the Bank's regulatory capital position.

 

On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was signed into law. The CARES Act includes provisions relating to refundable payroll tax credits, deferment of the employer portion of certain payroll taxes, net operating loss carryback periods, and modifications to the net interest deduction limitations. While the Company continues to evaluate the impact of the CARES Act, it does not currently believe it will have a material impact on the Company’s income taxes or related disclosures.

 

Derivatives

As of December 31, 2020, Patriot had entered into four interest rate swaps (“swaps”). Two swaps are with a loan customer to provide a facility to mitigate the fluctuations in the variable rate on the respective loan. The other two swaps are with an outside third party. The customer interest rate swaps are matched in offsetting terms to the third party interest rate swaps. The swaps are reported at fair value in other assets or other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Patriot’s swaps are derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments, thus any net gain or loss resulting from changes in the fair value is recognized in other noninterest income. The Company recognized $30,000 gain on the swaps for the year ended December 31, 2019. No gain on the swaps was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2018.

 

Further discussion of the final derivatives is set forth in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

 

Deposits

The following table is a summary of the Company’s deposits at the dates shown:

 

(In thousands)		December 31,
		2020				2019				2018
Non-interest bearing		$	158,676			$	88,135			$	84,471
Interest bearing:
NOW			30,529				26,864				26,100
Savings			98,635				64,020				81,912
Money market			146,389				99,115				85,197
Certificates of deposit, less than $250,000			160,968				193,942				203,683
Certificates of deposit, $250,000 or greater			49,172				67,550				78,318
Brokered deposits			41,287				229,909				183,600
Total Interest bearing			526,980				681,400				658,810
Total Deposits		$	685,656			$	769,535			$	743,281

 

Total deposits decreased by $83.8 million or 10.9%, from $769.5 million at December 31, 2019 to $685.7 million at December 31, 2020, resulting from a reduction of $188.6 million in higher cost brokered deposits and $51.4 million of certificates of deposits, as those balances were allowed to roll off in connection with the planned decline in outstanding loan balances. These declines were was partially offset by an increase in money market deposits impacted by the roll-out of the Company’s national on-line money market account which added $26.2 million to the money market balance, and a $59.3 million increase in non-interest bearing deposits related to the prepaid debit card business through December 31, 2020.

 

Borrowings

As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, total borrowings were $120.8 million and $130.9 million, respectively. Borrowings consist of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances, senior notes, junior subordinated debentures, and a note payable to the seller from whom the Fairfield branch building was purchased in 2015.

 

Shareholders’ Equity

Equity decreased $3.8 million from $67.0 million at December 31, 2019 to $63.2 million at December 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily due to $3.8 million of net loss for the year ended December 31, 2020 and $115,000 investment portfolio unrealized loss, which was partially offset by $159,000 of equity compensation for the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

 

Average Balances

The following table presents daily average balance sheets, interest income, interest expense and the corresponding yields earned and rates paid for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020.

 

(In thousands)		Year ended December 31,
		2020												2019												2018
		Daily Average Balance ($)				Interest ($)				Yield (%)				Daily Average Balance ($)				Interest ($)				Yield (%)				Daily Average Balance ($)				Interest ($)				Yield (%)
ASSETS
Interest Earning Assets:
Loans		$	791,626			$	35,835				4.51			$	807,162			$	40,568				5.03			$	748,260			$	37,546				5.02
Investments			59,668				1,859				3.12				56,897				2,120				3.73				45,514				1,796				3.95
Cash equivalents and other			49,071				209				0.42				45,276				956				2.11				55,858				1,033				1.84
Total interest earning assets			900,365				37,903				4.20				909,335				43,644				4.80				849,632				40,375				4.75
Cash and due from banks			2,357												5,024												5,330
Allowance for loan losses			(10,896	)											(8,087	)											(6,507	)
OREO			2,259												2,551												748
Other assets			62,086												59,318												54,017
Total Assets		$	956,171											$	968,141											$	903,220
Liabilities
Interest bearing liabilities:
Deposits		$	641,981			$	9,154				1.42			$	682,826			$	13,985				2.05			$	616,081			$	9,024				1.46
Borrowings			92,469				2,671				2.88				94,084				2,175				2.31				108,108				1,634				1.51
Senior notes			11,888				915				7.70				11,814				915				7.75				11,739				915				7.79
Subordinated debt			17,872				991				5.53				17,834				1,118				6.27				13,060				767				5.87
Note Payable and other			1,086				19				1.74				1,364				25				1.83				2,037				38				1.87
Total interest bearing liabilities			765,296				13,750				1.79				807,922				18,218				2.25				751,025				12,378				1.65
Demand deposits			116,519												81,754												78,765
Other liabilities			8,760												8,965												4,545
Total Liabilities			890,575												898,641												834,335
Shareholders' equity			65,596												69,500												68,885
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity		$	956,171											$	968,141											$	903,220
Net interest income						$	24,153											$	25,426											$	27,997
Interest margin											2.68												2.80												3.29
Interest spread											2.41												2.55												3.10

 

 

The following table presents the change in interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities by major category and the related change in the interest income earned and interest expense incurred thereon attributable to the change in transactional volume in the financial instruments and the rates of interest applicable thereto, comparing the years ended December 31, 2020 to 2019 and December 31, 2019 to 2018.

 

		Year Ended December 31,
		2020 compared to 2019																2019 compared to 2018
(In thousands)		Increase/(Decrease)																Increase/(Decrease)
		Daily Average Balance				Volume				Rate				Total				Daily Average Balance				Volume				Rate				Total
Interest Earning Assets:
Loans		$	(15,536	)		$	(744	)		$	(3,989	)		$	(4,733	)		$	58,902			$	2,894			$	128			$	3,022
Investments			2,771				97				(358	)			(261	)			11,383				412				(88	)			324
Cash equivalents and other			3,795				82				(829	)			(747	)			(10,582	)			(199	)			122				(77	)
Total interest earning assets			(8,970	)			(565	)			(5,176	)			(5,741	)			59,703				3,107				162				3,269
Interest bearing liabilities:
Deposit			(40,845	)			(1,366	)			(3,465	)			(4,831	)			66,745				1,609				3,352				4,961
Borrowings			(1,615	)			(35	)			531				496				(14,024	)			(212	)			753				541
Senior notes			74				-				-				-				75				-				-				-
Subordinated debt			38				-				(127	)			(127	)			4,774				280				71				351
Note payable and other			(278	)			(6	)			-				(6	)			(673	)			(13	)			-				(13	)
Total interest bearing liabilities			(42,626	)			(1,407	)			(3,061	)			(4,468	)			56,897				1,664				4,176				5,840
Net interest income		$	33,656			$	842			$	(2,115	)		$	(1,273	)		$	2,806			$	1,443			$	(4,014	)		$	(2,571	)

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

A discussion regarding our financial condition and results of operations for fiscal 2020 compared to fiscal 2019 is presented below. Discussions of fiscal 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found under Item 7 of Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the SEC on April 29, 2020.

 

Comparison of Results of Operations for the years 2020 and 2019

 

For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded a net loss of $3.8 million ($0.97 basic and diluted loss per share) compared to a net loss of $2.8 million ($0.72 basic and diluted earnings per share) for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

Loss before tax benefit was $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to income before income tax expense of $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Significant variances include:

	•	Interest and dividend income decreased $5.7 million;
	•	Interest expense decreased $4.4 million;
	•	Net interest income decreased $1.2 million;
	•	Provision for loan losses decreased $2.8 million; and
	•	Non-interest expense increased $1.4 million.

 

 

Net interest income

Net interest income is the difference between interest income on interest earning assets and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income depends on the relative amounts of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned or paid on them, respectively.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2020, interest income decreased to $37.9 million, as compared to $43.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which was primarily attributable to a decrease of $15.5 million in average loan balances, along with a decline in rates earned on loans reflecting the sharp drop in interest rates early in 2020.

 

Total interest expense decreased to $13.8 million, as compared to $18.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to a decrease of $4.8 million in deposit interest expense, which was partially offset by an increase of $496,000 in interest on FHLB borrowings. The decline in deposit interest expense reflects a change in the composition of deposits as higher cost brokered deposits were allowed to mature without replacement to match the overall decline in average earning assets. In addition, retail deposit rates declined as market rates declined nationally as well as in Patriot’s local retail deposit market. Finally, the addition of the prepaid deposit business (adding $59.3 million of deposits at the end of 2020) contributed to the overall drop in deposit interest expense.

 

Net interest income for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $24.2 million and $25.4 million, respectively. Net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were 2.7% and 2.8%, respectively.

 

The overall decline in net interest income was primarily due to the decline in business activity reflected in a $15.5 million decline in the average loan balance during 2020 connected to the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, asset yields were impacted by the sharp decline in interest rates at the beginning of the second quarter while retail and brokered deposit rates declined at a slower pace. Compared to the prior year, net interest income was also negatively impacted by an increase in the rate paid on FHLB borrowings associated with the conversion of certain borrowings from a low variable teaser rate to higher fixed rate.

 

Provision for loan losses

For the year ended December 31, 2020, provision for loan losses was $2.2 million, as compared with $5.0 million in 2019. The provision for loan losses in 2020 was primarily due to a $900,000 loan charge-off on a single borrower and additional reserves attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the provision for loan losses was primarily attributable to a $2.3 million commercial loan charge-off and a reserve for loan losses of $1.5 million for one commercial real estate loan in 2019.

 

Non-interest income

For the year ended December 31, 2020, non-interest income decreased to $2.0 million, as compared to $2.5 million in 2019. The decrease was primarily attributable to a reduction of $325,000 in net realized gains on the sale of SBA loans associated with delays in executing the sale of those loans associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

Non-interest expense

For the year ended December 31, 2020, non-interest expense increased to $28.1 million, as compared to $26.7 million for 2019. The increase in non-interest expenses was primarily driven by an increase of $642,000 in salaries and benefits reflecting the build-up of staffing in the SBA business since the second half of 2019, an increase in project expense of $353,000, and an increase of $244,000 in regulatory assessments.

 

 

LIQUIDITY

 

The Company’s balance sheet liquidity to total assets ratio was 9.0% at December 31, 2020 compared to 10.0% at December 31, 2019. Liquidity including readily available off-balance sheet funding sources was 21.7% at December 31, 2020 compared to 17.3% at December 31, 2019.

 

The following categories of assets are considered balance sheet liquidity: cash and due from banks, federal funds sold (if any), short-term investments (if any), unpledged available-for-sale securities, and loans held for sale. In addition, off-balance sheet funding sources include collateral based borrowing available from the FHLB, and correspondent bank borrowing lines.

 

Liquidity is a measure of the Company’s ability to generate adequate cash to meet its financial obligations. The principal cash requirements of a financial institution are to cover downward fluctuations in deposit accounts. Management believes the Company’s liquid assets provide sufficient coverage to satisfy loan demand, cover potential fluctuations in deposit accounts, and to meet other anticipated operational cash requirements.

 

The Company is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston ("FHLB-B"). At December 31, 2020, the outstanding advances from the FHLB-B aggregated $90.0 million. The additional borrowing capacity available from FHLB-B is $80.4 million, which is comprised of $78.4 million of advances and a $2.0 million overnight line of credit. Additionally, the Bank retains a collateralized borrowing line with the Federal Reserve Bank which totaled $26.3 million at December 31, 2020.

 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

The Bank’s off-balance sheet commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee by the borrower. Since these commitments could expire without being drawn upon or are contingent upon the customer adhering to the terms of the agreements, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Bank’s off-balance sheet commitments were $122.4 million and $145.1 million, respectively.

 

REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

 

The following tables illustrate the Company’s and the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios at December 31, 2020 and 2019:

 

		Patriot National Bancorp, Inc.																Patriot Bank, N.A.
(In thousands)		December 31, 2020								December 31, 2019								December 31, 2020								December 31, 2019
		Amount ($)				Ratio (%)				Amount ($)				Ratio (%)				Amount ($)				Ratio (%)				Amount ($)				Ratio (%)
Total Capital (to risk weighted assets)		$	87,428				11.132			$	90,083				10.510			$	97,614				12.503			$	100,953				11.826
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets)			67,602				8.608				69,957				8.161				87,845				11.251				90,827				10.640
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets)			59,602				7.589				61,957				7.228				87,845				11.251				90,827				10.640
Tier 1 Leverage Capital (to average assets)			67,602				7.539				69,957				7.148				87,845				9.795				90,827				9.279

 

Capital adequacy is one of the most important factors used to determine the safety and soundness of individual banks and the banking system. Under the regulatory framework for prompt correction action, to be considered “well capitalized,” an institution must generally have a leverage capital ratio of at least 9.0%, CET1 capital ratio at least 6.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%. However, the OCC has the discretion to require increased capital ratios.

 

 

Under the final capital rules that became effective on January 1, 2015, there is a requirement for a CET1 Capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets, which is in addition to the other minimum risk-based capital standards in the rule. Institutions that do not maintain this required capital buffer become subject to progressively more stringent limitations on the percentage of earnings that may be distributed to shareholders or used for stock repurchases and on the payment of discretionary bonuses to senior executive management.

 

The capital buffer requirement was phased in over three years beginning in 2016. The capital conversation buffer increased to 2.5% for 2019 and 2020, which has been included in the minimum capital adequacy ratios in the table above.

 

The capital buffer requirement effectively raises the Bank’s minimum required Total Capital ratio to 10.5%, the Tier 1 Capital ratio to 8.5%, and the CET1 Capital ratio to 7.0% on a fully phased-in basis, which was effective on January 1, 2019. As of December 31, 2020, Patriot satisfies all capital adequacy requirements on a fully phased-in basis.

 

On January 22, 2019, based on its supervisory profile, the Bank was notified by the OCC that it established individual minimum capital ratios for the Bank. Specifically, the Bank is required to maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 9.0% and a total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets of 11.0%.

 

At December 31, 2020, the Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements with a Tier 1 leverage capital level of $87.8 million, or 9.8% of adjusted total assets, which is above the well-capitalized required level of 9.0%; total risk-based capital of $97.6 million, or 12.5% of risk-weighted assets, which is above the well-capitalized required level of 11.0% of risk-weighted assets; At December 31, 2019, the Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements with a Tier 1 leverage capital level of 9.3% of adjusted total assets of $90.8 million, which is above the well-capitalized required level of 9.0%; and total risk-based capital of $101.0 million, or 11.8% of risk-weighted assets, which is above the well-capitalized required level of 11.0% of risk weighted assets. Accordingly, the Bank was categorized as well capitalized at December 31, 2020 and 2019. Management is not aware of any conditions or events since the most recent notification that would change the Bank’s category.

 

Management continuously assesses the adequacy of the Bank’s capital with the goal to maintain a “well capitalized” classification.

 

 

ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Market risk is defined as the sensitivity of income to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices, commodity prices and other market-driven rates or prices. The Bank’s market risk is primarily limited to interest rate risk.

 

The Bank’s goal is to maximize long term profitability while minimizing its exposure to interest rate fluctuations. The first priority is to structure and price the Bank’s assets and liabilities to maintain an acceptable interest rate spread while reducing the net effect of changes in interest rates. In order to accomplish this, the focus is on maintaining a proper balance between the timing and volume of assets and liabilities re-pricing within the balance sheet. One method of achieving this balance is to originate variable rate loans for the portfolio and purchase short-term investments to offset the increasing short-term re-pricing of the liability side of the balance sheet. In fact, a number of the interest-bearing deposit products have no contractual maturity. Therefore, deposit balances may run off unexpectedly due to changing market conditions. Additionally, loans and investments with longer term rate adjustment frequencies can be matched against longer term deposits and borrowings to lock in a desirable spread.

 

The exposure to interest rate risk is monitored by the Management Asset and Liability Committee consisting of senior management personnel. The Committee reviews the interrelationships within the balance sheet to maximize net interest income within acceptable levels of risk. This Committee reports to the Board of Directors. In addition to the Management Asset and Liability Committee, there is a Board Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”), which meets quarterly. ALCO monitors the interest rate risk analyses, reviews investment transactions during the period and determines compliance with the Bank’s Investment, ALCO and Liquidity policies.

 

Management analyzes the Bank’s interest rate sensitivity position to manage the risk associated with interest rate movements through the use of interest income simulation and GAP analysis. The matching of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to which such assets and liabilities are “interest sensitive.” An asset or liability is said to be interest sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within that time period.

 

Management’s goal is to manage asset and liability positions to moderate the effects of interest rate fluctuations on net interest income. Interest income simulations are completed quarterly and presented to ALCO. The simulations provide an estimate of the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income under a range of assumptions. Changes to these assumptions can significantly affect the results of the simulations. The simulation incorporates assumptions regarding the potential timing in the repricing of certain assets and liabilities when market rates change and the changes in spreads between different market rates.

 

Simulation analysis is only an estimate of the Company’s interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time. Management regularly reviews the potential effect changes in interest rates could have on the repayment of rate sensitive assets and funding requirements of rate sensitive liabilities.

 

 

The tables below set forth examples of changes in estimated net interest income and the estimated net portfolio value based on projected scenarios of interest rate increases and decreases. The analyses indicate the rate risk embedded in the Company’s portfolio at the dates indicated should all interest rates instantaneously rise or fall. The results of these changes are added to or subtracted from the base case; however, there are certain limitations to these types of analyses. Rate changes are rarely instantaneous, and these analyses may therefore overstate the impact of short-term repricings. As a result of the historically low interest rate environment, the calculated effects of the 100 and 200 basis point downward shocks cannot absolutely reflect the risk to earnings and equity, since the interest rates on certain balance sheet items have approached their minimums. Therefore, it is not possible for the analyses to fully measure the true impact of these downward shocks.

 

(In thousands)
			Net Portfolio Value - Performance Summary
			As of December 31, 2020												As of December 31, 2019
Projected Interest Rate Scenario			Estimated Value				Change from Base ($)				Change from Base (%)				Estimated Value				Change from Base ($)				Change from Base (%)
+200			$	111,300				2,524				2.3			$	115,401			$	(4,473	)			(3.7	)
+100				110,657				1,881				1.7				119,249				(625	)			(0.5	)
BASE				108,776				-				-				119,874				-				-
-100				112,229				3,453				3.2				119,167				(707	)			(0.6	)
-200				129,821				21,045				19.3				117,418				(2,456	)			(2.0	)

 

(In thousands)			Net Interest Income - Performance Summary
			Year ended December 31, 2020												Year ended December 31, 2019
Projected Interest Rate Scenario			Estimated Value				Change from Base ($)				Change from Base (%)				Estimated Value				Change from Base ($)				Change from Base (%)
+200			$	28,959			$	1,926				7.1			$	30,354			$	2,160				7.7
+100				27,946				913				3.4				29,385				1,191				4.2
BASE				27,033				-				-				28,194				-				-
-100				27,162				129				0.5				27,173				(1,021	)			(3.6	)
-200				27,215				182				0.7				26,280				(1,914	)			(6.8	)

 

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

 

Patriot’s financial statements have been prepared in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on the Bank’s performance than the effect of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services. Notwithstanding this, inflation can directly affect the value of loan collateral, in particular, real estate. Inflation, or disinflation, could significantly affect Patriot’s earnings in future periods.

 

 

ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

The Financial Statements required by this item are presented in the order shown below:

-	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
-	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019
-	Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020
-	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020
-	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020
-	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020
-	Consolidated Supplemental Statements of Non-Cash Activity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020
-	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc.

 

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

 

 

Qualitative Adjustments to the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

 

As described in Notes 1 and 4 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses (allowance) totaled $10.6 million as of December 31, 2020. The recorded allowance was established based on an allowance of $9.2 million related to loans collectively evaluated for impairment and on an allowance of $1.4 million relating to loans individually evaluated for impairment as of December 31, 2020.

 

For loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, the Company segregates loans into pools based on homogeneous risk characteristics. The non-specific allowance is established through historical loss experience of the loan pools over their respective loss emergence periods adjusted for qualitative factors. The qualitative factors are additional reserves applied to the segmented loan pools to reflect the inherent risk of loss that exists in the portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The Company has determined qualitative factors to include: 1) changes in lending policies and procedures; 2) changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments; 3) changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans; 4) changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff; 5) changes in the volume and loss severity of past due loans, the volume of non-accrual loans, and the volume and loss severity of adversely classified or graded loans; 6) changes in the quality of the Company’s loan review system; 7) changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans; 8) the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations; 9) the effect of other external factors; and 10) an additional factor allocated to special mention and substandard rated loans. In addition and as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company also applied a qualitative factor related to this event, which is designed to absorb probable incurred loan losses that are negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Evaluation of the allowance, in particular the qualitative factor adjustments, requires considerable judgment, in order to adequately estimate and provide for the risk of loss inherent in the loan portfolio segments.

 

We identified the qualitative factors adjustments applied to the non-specific allowance as a critical audit matter due to the high degree of auditor judgment in order to evaluate the subjective assumptions made by management within the calculation.

 

Our audit procedures related to the qualitative factor adjustments applied to the non-specific allowance included the following:

 

-

We tested the completeness and accuracy of data used by management in determining the qualitative factor adjustments by agreeing them to their appropriate internal or external sources.

 

-

We evaluated the reasonableness of the directional consistency of changes in qualitative factor adjustments as well as the overall magnitude of management’s qualitative factor adjustments applied to each pool based on the data used by management.

 

Goodwill Impairment Assessment

 

As described in Notes 1 and 8 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s goodwill balance totaled $1.1 million as of December 31, 2020. The Company performs a goodwill impairment test annually as of October 31, or whenever certain triggering events occur or there are circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount are identified. Management estimates the fair value of the reporting unit by considering multiple valuation techniques, which include subjective assumptions about the future cash flows of the Company, assumptions within the capitalization rate, valuation multiples, and market data used.

 

 

We identified the impairment assessment of goodwill as a critical audit matter due to the high degree of auditor judgement and subjectivity in order to evaluate the fair value of the reporting unit due to the judgements made by management in the estimation of the Company’s reporting unit fair value, including those related to future cash flows, the capitalization rate, the valuation multiples used, and the market data incorporated into the estimate. In addition, the increased audit effort involved the use of internal professionals with specialized skill and knowledge in the field of business valuation.

 

Our audit procedures related to goodwill impairment assessment included the following for the impairment test performed for the year:

 

-

We evaluated management’s process for developing the fair value estimates of the reporting unit including an assessment of the appropriateness of the valuation techniques used.

 

-

We evaluated management’s cash flow projections and significant assumptions incorporated into the business plan by considering the current and past performance by the Company, the Company’s ability to meet financial projections, and the consistency of these assumptions with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.

 

-

We used the assistance of internal professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in the evaluation of significant assumptions used in the valuation methodology. This included:

 

o

Testing the fair value of the reporting unit through testing of the completeness and accuracy of the data used by management to develop the estimate.

o

Evaluating the reasonableness of the cash flow projections calculations used to develop the estimate.

o

Evaluating the capitalization rate, the valuation multiples used, and the market data incorporated into the estimate by assessing the reasonableness, comparability and appropriateness of the market-based information used by agreeing the components to independent source data.

 

Realizability of the Deferred Tax Assets

 

As discussed in Notes 1 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recorded $11.3 million in deferred tax assets, net of a $1.9 million state net operating loss valuation allowance, as of December 31, 2020. Management applied significant judgment in assessing the positive and negative evidence available in the determination of the amount of deferred tax assets that were more-likely-than-not to be realized in the future. In evaluating the need, or continued need, for a valuation allowance, management considers the weighting of the positive and negative evidence, which included, among other things, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative taxable income or losses, forecasts of future profitability, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, as well as the Company’s intent and ability to implement tax strategies.

 

 

We identified the realizability of deferred tax assets as a critical audit matter because of the significant assumptions and judgments use by management in determining the amount of deferred tax assets that were more-likely-than-not to be realized in the future, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity in applying procedures relating to assessing the positive and negative evidence considered by management.  Additionally, there was significant audit effort necessary in evaluating the weighting of the positive and negative evidence, including the use of internal professionals with specialized skill and knowledge in the field of income tax accounting.

 

Our audit procedures related to the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets included the following, among others:

 

-

We obtained an understanding and evaluated management’s process over the assessment of the realizability of deferred tax assets, including how it incorporates positive and negative evidence into its evaluation.

 

-

We evaluated the positive and negative evidence in assessing whether the deferred tax assets are more-likely-than-not to be realized in the future, including evaluating the trends of both the historical financial results and the projected sources of taxable income, as well as other qualitative factors.

 

-

We evaluated management’s cash flow projections and significant assumptions incorporated into the business plan by considering the current and past performance by the Company, the Company’s ability to meet financial projections, and the consistency of these assumptions with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.

 

-

With the assistance of our internal tax professionals, we evaluated the Company’s application of income tax accounting guidance and regulations used in its realizability analysis.

 

-

We evaluated the Company’s consideration of cumulative pre-tax losses and the net deferred tax position in assessing whether deferred tax assets were more-than-not to be realized in the future, which included:

 

o

Testing the completeness and accuracy of the data used by management in their analyses.

o

Evaluating the reasonableness of management’s evaluation of whether tax planning strategies were prudent and feasible.

o

Evaluating management’s intent and ability to implement tax strategies in order to realize state net operating losses before expiration.

 

 

 

/s/ RSM US LLP

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.

 

New Haven, Connecticut

March 30, 2021

 

 

 

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

PATRIOT NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to consolidated financial statements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Patriot maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information that is required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely fashion. In designing and evaluating such controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Management’s judgment is required in evaluating controls and procedures.

 

As used herein, “disclosure controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures of Patriot that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Patriot in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and regulations. Patriot’s disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Continual evaluation of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures is performed by management, with the participation of Patriot’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Management has concluded that Patriot’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

A system of internal controls is designed to provide reasonable assurance that management’s operating objectives, reliance on financial information and reports, and compliance with its mandated and stakeholder obligations are achieved. In implementing internal controls, management must consider constraints on resources and the benefits of controls relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. The design of any system of controls is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

 

Management believes all necessary disclosure controls and procedures needed to provide reasonable assurance that information will be communicated in a timely fashion to management are in place.

 

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Patriot’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting, as defined in rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15f under the Exchange Act. Patriot’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

 

Patriot’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and deployment of its assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded in a timely manner to enable the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP; receipts and disbursements are made only in compliance with the authorizations established by management and policies instituted by its Board of Directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

 

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on management’s assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2020, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

 

Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. In addition, projections of any evaluations of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and/or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, management’s report on the design and effectiveness of Patriot’s system of internal controls over financial reporting is not subject to attestation by Patriot’s independent registered public accounting firm. The SEC rules and regulations applicable to Patriot only require a report by management. Accordingly, this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 does not include an opinion by Patriot’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding management’s system of internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B. Other Information

 

None

 

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

The information required by Items 401, 405, 406 and 407 (c)(3); (d)(4) and (d)(5) of Regulation S-K is incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement or information statement for its 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days following December 31, 2020.

 

The Company has previously adopted a Code of Conduct for its senior financial officers, which was filed as Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the SEC on March 25, 2015. In addition, the Company adopted a Code of Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy on October 24, 2018, amended as of March 27, 2019, which was filed as Exhibit 14.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on April 1, 2019. In March 2021, the Code of Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy was further amended, which was filed herewith as Exhibit 14.3. Copies of these codes will be provided to any person so requesting by writing to Patriot National Bancorp Inc., 900 Bedford Street, Stamford, Connecticut 06901, Attn: Joseph D. Perillo, Chief Financial Officer.

 

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation

 

The information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K is incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the Definitive Proxy Statement or Information Statement to be filed within 120 days following December 31, 2020.

 

ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

 

The information required by Item 201(d) and Item 403 of Regulation S-K is incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the Definitive Proxy Statement or Information Statement, to be filed within 120 days following December 31, 2020.

 

The table below provides information as of December 31, 2020, with respect to the compensation plan under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance to directors, officers or employees.

 

Plan Category		Number of common shares to be issued upon vesting of restricted shares				Weighted average grant date fair value				Number of common shares available for issuance under the Plan excluding unvested shares
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders			18,498			$	7.29				2,850,507
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders			-				-				-
Total			18,498			$	7.29				2,850,507

 

 

ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

The information required by Items 404 and 407(a) of Regulation S-K is incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the Definitive Proxy Statement or Information Statement to be filed within 120 days following December 31, 2020.

 

ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

The information required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A is incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference to the Definitive Proxy Statement or Information Statement to be filed within 120 days following December 31, 2020.

 

 

Part IV

 

ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

Exhibits
No.	Description
3(i)	Certificate of Incorporation of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 1, 1999)
3(i)(A)	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. dated July 16, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(A) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed on March 25, 2005)
3(i)(B)	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. dated June 15, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(B) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed on November 14, 2006)
3(i)(C)	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Patriot National Bancorp Inc., dated October 6, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.l to the Company’s Current Report Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2010)
3(ii)	Amended and Restated By-laws of Patriot National Bancorp Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2010)
4	Form of 6.25% Fixed to Floating Rate Subordinated Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 filed on August 14, 2018)
10(a)(1)	2012 Stock Plan of Patriot National Bancorp Inc. (incorporated by reference from Annex A to the Proxy Statement on Form 14C filed on November 1, 2011)
10(a)(2)	Amended Financial Services Agreement, by and between Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. and PNBK Sponsor LLC, dated August 7, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) (20) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (Commission File No. 000-29599) filed on August 8, 2014)
10(a)(3)	Form of Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(6) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 filed on August 14, 2018)
10(a)(4)	Form of Agreement with The Comptroller of the Currency, dated as of November 7, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99(1) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 filed on November 14, 2018)
14.1	Code of Conduct for Senior Financial Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10 -KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 (Commission File No. 000-29599)
14.2	Code of Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy, dated March 27, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 filed on April 1, 2019)
14.3	Code of Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy, dated March 24, 2021 (filed herewith)
21	Subsidiaries of Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 filed on April 29, 2020)

 

 

23.1	Consent of RSM US LLP
31(1)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31(2)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32	Section 1350 Certifications
101.INS#	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH#	XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL#	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB#	XBRL Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE#	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF#	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
The exhibits marked with the section symbol (#) are interactive data files.

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: March 30, 2021
	Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (Registrant)
	By:	/s/ Joseph D. Perillo
		Name: Joseph D. Perillo
		Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

	Signature	Title	Date
	/s/ Robert G. Russell Robert G. Russell	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	March 30, 2021
	/s/ Joseph D. Perillo Joseph D. Perillo	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)	March 30, 2021
	/s/ Edward N. Constantino Edward N. Constantino	Director	March 30, 2021
	/s/ Raymond B. Smyth Raymond B. Smyth	Director	March 30, 2021
	/s/ Emile Van den Bol Emile Van den Bol	Director	March 30, 2021
	/s/ Michael J. Weinbaum Michael J. Weinbaum	Director	March 30, 2021