Prime Meridian Holding Co - FORM 10-Q

Prime Meridian Holding Co - FORM 10-Q - November 9, 2017

Attached files

Attached files

Prime Meridian Holding Co Reports

file	filename
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - Prime Meridian Holding Co	d466411dex321.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - Prime Meridian Holding Co	d466411dex312.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - Prime Meridian Holding Co	d466411dex311.htm
EX-10.7 - EX-10.7 - Prime Meridian Holding Co	d466411dex107.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 333-191801

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY

(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Florida		27-2980805
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

1897 Capital Circle NE, Second Floor, Tallahassee, Florida		32308
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(850) 907-2301

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of November 9, 2017: 3,102,127

INDEX


	PAGE
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets September 30, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016		2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)		3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)		4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity Nine Months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)		5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Nine Months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)		6

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		7-28

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		29-41

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		41

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		41-42

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		42

Item 1A. Risk Factors		42

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		43

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		43

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures		43

Item 5. Other Information		43

Item 6. Exhibits		44-45

Signatures		46

Certifications

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets


	September 30,			December 31,
	2017			2016
(in thousands)	(Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	8,930		$	4,817
Federal funds sold		19,865			25,963
Interest bearing deposits		5,528			5,385

Total cash and cash equivalents		34,323			36,165
Securities available for sale		48,744			33,103
Loans held for sale		7,459			3,291
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $3,072 and $2,876		245,160			222,768
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		316			220
Premises and equipment, net		4,935			4,929
Accrued interest receivable		875			798
Bank owned life insurance		1,746			1,711
Other assets		983			956

Total assets	$	344,541		$	303,941

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Non-interest bearing demand deposits	$	70,704		$	61,856
Savings, NOW and money-market deposits		203,131			192,768
Time deposits		22,879			20,723

Total deposits		296,714			275,347
Official checks		566			632
Other liabilities		934			880

Total liabilities		298,214			276,859

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, undesignated; 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 9,000,000 shares authorized, 3,101,319 and 2,004,707 issued and outstanding		31			20
Additional paid-in capital		37,770			20,732
Retained earnings		8,546			6,563
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(20	)		(233	)

Total stockholders’ equity		46,327			27,082

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	344,541		$	303,941

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	2017		2016		2017			2016
Interest income:
Loans	$	3,025	$	2,573	$	8,498		$	7,294
Securities		252		156		709			538
Other		114		26		271			74

Total interest income		3,391		2,755		9,478			7,906

Interest expense:
Deposits		326		205		829			598
Other borrowings		—		1		—			1

Total interest expense		326		206		829			599

Net interest income		3,065		2,549		8,649			7,307
Provision for loan losses		32		108		187			412

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		3,033		2,441		8,462			6,895

Non-interest income:
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts		80		74		241			174
Mortgage banking revenue		275		260		943			637
Income from bank owned life insurance		12		12		35			37
(Loss) gain on sale of securities available for sale		—		—		(1	)		102
Other income		88		69		258			206

Total non-interest income		455		415		1,476			1,156

Non-interest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		1,248		1,062		3,734			3,006
Occupancy and equipment		247		209		727			624
Professional fees		90		81		235			285
Advertising		129		94		440			361
FDIC assessment		35		36		123			102
Software maintenance, amortization and other		132		125		394			375
Other		321		304		977			863

Total non-interest expense		2,202		1,911		6,630			5,616

Earnings before income taxes		1,286		945		3,308			2,435
Income taxes		464		335		1,185			861

Net earnings	$	822	$	610	$	2,123		$	1,574

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.26	$	0.31	$	0.83		$	0.79
Diluted		0.26		0.31		0.83			0.79
Cash dividends per common share⁽¹⁾		—		—		0.07			0.05

⁽¹⁾	Annual cash dividends were paid during the first quarters of 2016 and 2017

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
(in thousands)	2017			2016			2017			2016
Net earnings	$	822		$	610		$	2,123		$	1,574
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities:
Unrealized (loss) gain arising during the period		5			(64	)		338			593
Reclassification adjustment for realized loss (gain)		—			—			1			(102	)

Net change in unrealized (loss) gain		5			(64	)		339			491
Deferred income (taxes) benefit on above change		(2	)		24			(126	)		(181	)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		3			(40	)		213			310

Comprehensive income	$	825		$	570		$	2,336		$	1,884

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016


										Accumulated
										Other
										Compre-
					Additional					hensive			Total
	Common Stock				Paid-in		Retained			Income			Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Earnings			(Loss)			Equity
(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2015		1,975,329	$	20	$	20,415	$	4,442		$	56		$	24,933
Net earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (unaudited)		—		—		—		1,574			—			1,574
Dividends paid (unaudited)		—		—		—		(99	)		—			(99	)
Net change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of income taxes (unaudited)		—		—		—		—			310			310
Stock options exercised (unaudited)		7,500		—		82		—			—			82
Common stock issued as compensation to directors (unaudited)		2,857		—		40		—			—			40
Stock based compensation (unaudited)		—		—		1		—			—			1

Balance at September 30, 2016 (unaudited)		1,985,686	$	20	$	20,538	$	5,917		$	366		$	26,841

Balance at December 31, 2016		2,004,707	$	20	$	20,732	$	6,563		$	(233	)	$	27,082

Net earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 (unaudited)		—		—		—		2,123			—			2,123
Dividends paid (unaudited)		—		—		—		(140	)		—			(140	)
Net change in unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of income taxes (unaudited)		—		—		—		—			213			213
Stock options exercised (unaudited)		2,600		—		26		—			—			26
Common stock issued as compensation to directors (unaudited)		3,104		—		51		—			—			51
Sale of common stock (unaudited) net of stock offering costs of $1,043		1,090,908		11		16,946		—			—			16,957
Stock based compensation (unaudited)		—		—		15		—			—			15

Balance at September 30, 2017 (unaudited)		3,101,319	$	31	$	37,770	$	8,546		$	(20	)	$	46,327

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow (Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
(in thousands)	2017			2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	2,123		$	1,574
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		390			395
Provision for loan losses		187			412
Net amortization of deferred loan fees		(118	)		(1	)
Loss (gain) on sale of securities available for sale		1			(102	)
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities available for sale		310			332
Gain on sale of loans held for sale		(822	)		(558	)
Proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale		48,919			33,268
Loans originated as held for sale		(52,265	)		(33,513	)
Stock issued as compensation		51			40
Stock based compensation expense		15			1
Income from bank owned life insurance		(35	)		(37	)
Net increase in accrued interest receivable		(77	)		(13	)
Net (increase) decrease in other assets		(153	)		205
Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities and official checks		(12	)		429

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(1,486	)		2,432

Cash flows from investing activities:
Loan originations, net of principal repayments		(22,461	)		(36,103	)
Purchase of securities available for sale		(20,510	)		(10,416	)
Principal repayments of securities available for sale		4,099			6,488
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale		750			8,248
Maturities and calls of securities available for sale		48			1,290
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		(96	)		(31	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(396	)		(826	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(38,566	)		(31,350	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits		21,367			43,583
Proceeds from stock options exercised		26			82
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net		16,957			—
Common stock dividends paid		(140	)		(99	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		38,210			43,566

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(1,842	)		14,648
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		36,165			8,429

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	34,323		$	23,077

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	827		$	525

Income taxes	$	1,223		$	670

Noncash transaction-
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale, net of taxes	$	213		$	310

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

(1)

General

Prime Meridian Holding Company (“PMHG”) owns 100% of the outstanding common stock of Prime Meridian Bank (the “Bank”) (collectively the “Company”). PMHG’s primary activity is the operation of the Bank. The Bank is a Florida state-chartered commercial bank, and the deposit accounts of the Bank are insured up to the applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Bank offers a variety of community banking services to individual and corporate clients through its three banking offices located in Tallahassee and Crawfordville, Florida and its online banking platform.

The accounting and financial reporting policies the Company follows conform, in all material respects, to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and to general practices within the banking industry. The condensed consolidated financial statements in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but in the opinion of management, reflect all necessary adjustments for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position and results of operations. All adjustments were of a normal and recurring nature. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and with the instructions to Form 10-Q adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, the condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial presentation and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, 2016, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 21, 2017. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any future period.

Comprehensive Income. GAAP generally requires that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in earnings. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the condensed consolidated balance sheet, such items along with net earnings, are components of comprehensive income. The only component of other comprehensive income (loss) is the net change in the unrealized gain (loss) on the securities available for sale.

Stock Based Compensation. The Company expenses the fair value of stock options granted. The Company recognizes stock option compensation in the condensed consolidated statement of earnings as the options vest.

Mortgage Banking Revenue. Mortgage banking revenue includes gains and losses on the sale of mortgage loans originated for sale and wholesale brokerage fees. The Company recognizes mortgage banking revenue from mortgage loans originated in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings upon sale of the loans.

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

(1)

General, Continued

Recent Accounting Standards Update. In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which is intended to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. The ASU requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair values recognized in net earnings, (public entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes), simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment and eliminates the requirement to disclose fair values, the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The ASU also clarifies that the Company should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale debt securities in combination with the Company’s other deferred tax assets. For public business entities, the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-2, Leases (Topic 842) which will require lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases with term of more than twelve months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. The new ASU will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. The ASU also will require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements, providing additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. For public companies, the ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is in the process of determining the effect of the ASU on its condensed consolidated financial statements. Early adoption is permitted.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) intended to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments. The ASU affects all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. The ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the consolidated statement of cash flows. For public companies, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The effect of the ASU on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements was not significant.

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(1)

General, Continued

In September 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326). The ASU improves financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by the Company. The ASU requires the Company to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. The Company will continue to use judgment to determine which loss estimation method is appropriate for their circumstances. The ASU requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements that provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. Additionally, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of determining the effect of the ASU on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The amendments in this update provide a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities is a business. Because the current definition of a business is interpreted broadly and can be difficult to apply, stakeholders indicated that analyzing transactions is inefficient and costly and that the definition does not permit the use of reasonable judgment. The amendments provide more consistency in applying the guidance, reduce the costs of application, and make the definition of a business more operable. The amendments in this update become effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance on the condensed consolidated financial statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, “Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities”, to amend the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. Under current GAAP, entities generally amortize the premium as an adjustment of yield over the contractual life of the instrument. The amendments in this update require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. No accounting change is required for securities held at a discount. For public business entities, the amendments in this update become effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity should apply the amendments in this update on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company has adhered to this practice since its inception.

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(2)

Securities Available for Sale

Securities are classified according to management’s intent. The carrying amount of securities and fair values are as follows:


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
(in thousands)
*At September 30, 2017*
U.S. Government agency securities	$	1,252	$	5	$	(1	)	$	1,256
Municipal securities		12,408		170		(68	)		12,510
Mortgage-backed securities		35,115		52		(189	)		34,978

Total	$	48,775	$	227	$	(258	)	$	48,744

*At December 31, 2016*
U.S. Government agency securities	$	2,186	$	2	$	(17	)	$	2,171
Municipal securities		12,614		91		(282	)		12,423
Mortgage-backed securities		18,673		36		(200	)		18,509

Total	$	33,473	$	129	$	(499	)	$	33,103

The following table summarizes the sale of securities available for sale.


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2017		2016		2017			2016
Proceeds from sale of securities	$	—	$	—	$	750		$	8,248
Gross gains		—		—		—			102
Gross losses		—		—		(1	)		—

Net (loss) gain on sale of securities	$	—	$	—	$	(1	)	$	102

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(2)

Securities Available for Sale, Continued

Securities with gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows:


	*Less Than Twelve Months*					*Over Twelve Months*
	Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
(in thousands)
*At September 30, 2017*
Securities Available for Sale
U.S. Government agency securities	$	(1	)	$	701	$	—		$	—
Municipal securities		(42	)		2,695		(26	)		898
Mortgage-backed securities		(181	)		21,573		(8	)		374

Total	$	(224	)	$	24,969	$	(34	)	$	1,272

*At December 31, 2016*
Securities Available for Sale
U.S. Government agency securities	$	(17	)	$	1,529	$	—		$	—
Municipal securities		(282	)		6,111		—			—
Mortgage-backed securities		(191	)		12,709		(9	)		501

Total	$	(490	)	$	20,349	$	(9	)	$	501

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(2)

Securities Available for Sale, Continued

The unrealized losses at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 on twenty-three and twenty-four securities, respectively, were caused by market conditions. It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the par value of the investments. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to market conditions and not credit quality, and because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired. Securities available for sale measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:


			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(in thousands)
*At September 30, 2017*
U.S. Government agency securities	$	1,256	$	—	$	1,256	$	—
Municipal securities		12,510		—		12,510		—
Mortgage-backed securities		34,978		—		34,978		—

Total	$	48,744	$	—	$	48,744	$	—

*At December 31, 2016*
U.S. Government agency securities	$	2,171	$	—	$	2,171	$	—
Municipal securities		12,423		—		12,423		—
Mortgage-backed securities		18,509		—		18,509		—

Total	$	33,103	$	—	$	33,103	$	—

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, no securities were transferred in or out of Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3.

The scheduled maturities of securities are as follows:


	At September 30, 2017
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
(in thousands)
Due in one to five years	$	2,976	$	2,959
Due in five to ten years		7,899		8,048
Due after ten years		2,785		2,759
Mortgage-backed securities		35,115		34,978

Total	$	48,775	$	48,744

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(3)

Loans

The composition of the Company’s loan portfolio, excluding loans held for sale, was the following for the periods presented below:


(in thousands)	At September 30, 2017			At December 31, 2016
Real estate mortgage loans:
Commercial	$	77,084		$	65,805
Residential and home equity		94,145			88,883
Construction		23,366			19,991

Total real estate mortgage loans		194,595			174,679
Commercial loans		46,193			46,340
Consumer and other loans		6,976			4,275

Total loans		247,764			225,294
Add (deduct):
Net deferred loan costs		468			350
Allowance for loan losses		(3,072	)		(2,876	)

Loans, net	$	245,160		$	222,768

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(3)

Loans, Continued

An analysis of the change in allowance for loan losses follows:


	Real Estate Mortgage Loans
(in thousands)	Commercial		Residential and Home Equity			Construction			Commercial Loans			Consumer and Other Loans			Total
*Three-Month Period Ended September 30, 2017*
Beginning balance	$	811	$	1,108		$	338		$	712		$	59		$	3,028
Provision (credit) for loan losses		49		(18	)		(51	)		28			24			32
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		—		—			—			12			—			12

Ending balance	$	860	$	1,090		$	287		$	752		$	83		$	3,072

*Three-Month Period Ended September 30, 2016*
Beginning balance	$	764	$	1,017		$	243		$	686		$	65		$	2,775
Provision (credit) for loan losses		11		28			32			40			(3	)		108
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		—		—			—			(17	)		(3	)		(20	)

Ending balance	$	775	$	1,045		$	275		$	709		$	59		$	2,863

*Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2017*
Beginning balance	$	775	$	1,074		$	258		$	714		$	55		$	2,876
Provision (credit) for loan losses		85		16			29			24			33			187
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		—		—			—			14			(5	)		9

Ending balance	$	860	$	1,090		$	287		$	752		$	83		$	3,072

*Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2016*
Beginning balance	$	707	$	868		$	246		$	596		$	56		$	2,473
Provision (credit) for loan losses		68		177			29			130			8			412
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		—		—			—			(17	)		(5	)		(22	)

Ending balance	$	775	$	1,045		$	275		$	709		$	59		$	2,863


*At September 30, 2017*
Individually evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	137		$	—		$	137

Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	137		$	—		$	137

Collectively evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	77,084	$	94,145		$	23,366		$	46,056		$	6,976		$	247,627

Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	860	$	1,090		$	287		$	615		$	83		$	2,935


*At December 31, 2016*
Individually evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	—	$	662		$	73		$	76		$	—		$	811

Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	76		$	—		$	76

Collectively evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	65,805	$	88,221		$	19,918		$	46,264		$	4,275		$	224,483

Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	775	$	1,074		$	258		$	638		$	55		$	2,800

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(3)

Loans, Continued

The Company has divided the loan portfolio into three portfolio segments and five portfolio classes, each with different risk characteristics and methodologies for assessing risk. All loans are underwritten based upon standards set forth in the policies approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company identifies the portfolio segments and classes as follows:

Real Estate Mortgage Loans. Real estate mortgage loans are typically divided into three classes: commercial, residential and home equity, and construction loans.

Commercial. Loans of this type are typically our more complex loans. This category of real estate loans is comprised of loans secured by mortgages on commercial property that are typically owner-occupied, but also includes non-owner occupied investment properties. Commercial loans that are secured by owner-occupied commercial real estate are repaid through operating cash flows of the borrower. The maturity for this type of loan is generally limited to three to five years; however, payments may be structured on a longer amortization basis. Typically, interest rates on our commercial real estate loans are fixed for five years or less after which they adjust based upon a predetermined spread over a market index rate. At times, a rate may be fixed for longer than five years. As part of our credit underwriting standards, the Company typically requires personal guarantees from the principal owners of the business supported by a review of the principal owners’ personal financial statements and tax returns. As part of the enterprise risk management process, it is understood that risks associated with commercial real estate loans include fluctuations in real estate values, the overall strength of the borrower and the economy, new job creation trends, tenant vacancy rates, environmental contamination, and the quality of the borrowers’ management. In order to mitigate and limit these risks, we analyze the borrowers’ cash flows and evaluate collateral value. Currently, the collateral securing our commercial real estate loans includes a variety of property types, such as office, warehouse, and retail facilities. Other types include multifamily properties, hotels, mixed-use residential and commercial properties. Generally, commercial real estate loans present a higher risk profile than our consumer real estate loan portfolio.

Residential and Home Equity. The Company offers first and second one-to-four family mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit; the collateral for these loans is generally the clients’ owner-occupied residences. Although these types of loans present lower levels of risk than commercial real estate loans, risks do still exist because of possible fluctuations in the value of the real estate collateral securing the loan, as well as changes in the borrowers’ financial condition. The nonowner-occupied investment properties are more similar in risk to commercial real estate loans, and therefore, are underwritten by assessing the property’s income potential and appraised value. In both cases, we underwrite the borrower’s financial condition and evaluate his or her global cash flow position. Borrowers may be affected by numerous factors, including job loss, illness, or other personal hardship. As part of our product mix, the Bank offers both portfolio and secondary market mortgages; portfolio loans generally are based on a 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, or 7-year adjustable rate mortgage; while 15-year or 30-year fixed-rate loans are generally sold in the secondary market.

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(3)

Loans, Continued

Construction. Typically, these loans have a construction period of one to two years and the interest is paid monthly. Once the construction period terminates, some of these loans convert to a term loan with a maturity of one to ten years. This portion of our loan portfolio includes loans to small and midsized businesses to construct owner-user properties, loans to developers of commercial real estate investment properties, and residential developments. This type of loan is also made to individual clients for construction of single family homes in our market area. An independent appraisal is used to determine the value of the collateral and confirm that the ratio of the loan principal to the value of the collateral will not exceed policies of the Bank. As the construction project progresses, loan proceeds are requested by the borrower to complete phases of construction and funding is only disbursed after the project has been inspected by a third-party inspector or experienced construction lender. Risks associated with construction loans include fluctuations in the value of real estate, project completion risk, and changes in market trends. The ability of the construction loan borrower to finance the loan or sell the property upon completion of the project is another risk factor that also may be affected by changes in market trends since the initial funding of the loan.

Commercial Loans. The Bank offers a wide range of commercial loans, including business term loans, equipment financing, lines of credit, and U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) loans. Small-to-medium sized businesses, retail, and professional establishments, make up our target market for commercial loans. Our Relationship Managers primarily underwrite these loans based on the borrower’s ability to service the loan from cash flow. Lines of credit and loans secured by accounts receivable and/or inventory are monitored periodically by our staff. Loans secured by “all business assets,” or a “blanket lien” are typically only made to highly qualified borrowers due to the nonspecific nature of the collateral and do not require a formal valuation of the business collateral. When commercial loans are secured by specifically identified collateral, then the valuation of the collateral is generally supported by an appraisal, purchase order, or third party physical inspection. Personal guarantees of the principals of business borrowers are usually required. Equipment loans generally have a term of five years or less and may have a fixed or variable rate; we use conservative margins when pricing these loans. Working capital loans generally do not exceed one year and typically, they are secured by accounts receivable, inventory, and personal guarantees of the principals of the business. The Bank currently offers SBA 504 and SBA 7A loans. SBA 504 loans provide financing for major fixed assets such as real estate and equipment while SBA 7A loans are generally used to establish a new business or assist in the acquisition, operation, or expansion of an existing business. With both SBA loan programs, there are set eligibility requirements and underwriting standards outlined by SBA that can change as the government alters its fiscal policy. Significant factors affecting a commercial borrower’s creditworthiness include the quality of management and the ability both to evaluate changes in the supply and demand characteristics affecting the business’ markets for products and services and to respond effectively to such changes. These loans may be made unsecured or secured, but most are made on a secured basis. Risks associated with our commercial loan portfolio include local, regional, and national market conditions.

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(3)

Loans, Continued

Other factors of risk could include changes in the borrower’s management and fluctuations in collateral value. Additionally, there may be refinancing risk if a commercial loan includes a balloon payment which must be refinanced or paid off at loan maturity. In reference to our risk management process, our commercial loan portfolio presents a higher risk profile than our consumer real estate and consumer loan portfolios. Therefore, we require that all loans to businesses must have a clearly stated and reasonable payment plan to allow for timely retirement of debt, unless secured by liquid collateral or as otherwise justified.

Consumer and Other Loans. These loans are made for various consumer purposes, such as the financing of automobiles, boats, and recreational vehicles. The payment structure of these loans is normally on an installment basis. The risk associated with this category of loans stems from the reduced collateral value for a defaulted loan; the collateral may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the principal. The underwriting on these loans is primarily based on the borrower’s financial condition. In many cases, these are unsecured credits that subject us to risk when the borrower’s financial condition declines or deteriorates. Based upon our current trend in consumer loans, management does not anticipate consumer loans will become a substantial component of our loan portfolio at any time in the foreseeable future. Consumer loans are made at fixed and variable interest rates and are based on the appropriate amortization for the asset and purpose.

The following summarizes the loan credit quality:


	Real Estate Mortgage Loans
(in thousands)	Commercial		Residential and Home Equity		Construction		Commercial Loans		Consumer and Other Loans		Total
*At September 30, 2017*
Grade:
Pass	$	72,027	$	91,598	$	22,909	$	44,549	$	6,948	$	238,031
Special mention		5,057		2,381		298		1,069		28		8,833
Substandard		—		166		159		575		—		900
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	77,084	$	94,145	$	23,366	$	46,193	$	6,976	$	247,764

*At December 31, 2016*
Grade:
Pass	$	61,734	$	84,695	$	19,485	$	45,623	$	4,227	$	215,764
Special mention		4,071		3,152		333		250		46		7,852
Substandard		—		1,036		173		467		2		1,678
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—
Loss		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	65,805	$	88,883	$	19,991	$	46,340	$	4,275	$	225,294

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(3)

Loans, Continued

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. Loans classified as substandard or special mention are reviewed quarterly by the Company for further deterioration or improvement to determine if they are appropriately classified and whether there is any impairment. All loans are graded upon initial issuance. Furthermore, construction loans, non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, and commercial loan relationships in excess of $500,000 are reviewed at least annually. The Company determines the appropriate loan grade during the renewal process and reevaluates the loan grade in situations when a loan becomes past due.

Loans excluded from the review process above are generally classified as pass credits until: (a) they become past due; (b) management becomes aware of deterioration in the credit worthiness of the borrower; or (c) the client contacts the Company for a modification. In these circumstances, the loan is specifically evaluated for potential classification as to special mention, substandard or even charged-off. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Pass – A Pass loan’s primary source of loan repayment is satisfactory, with secondary sources very likely to be realized if necessary.

Special Mention – A Special Mention loan has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or the Company’s credit position at some future date. Special Mention loans are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

Substandard – A Substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – A loan classified Doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified Substandard with the added characteristics that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loss – A loan classified Loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as a bankable asset is not warranted. This classification does not necessarily preclude the potential for recovery, but rather signifies it is no longer practical to defer writing off the asset.

At September 30, 2017, there was one nonaccrual loan, totaling $60,000.

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(3)

Loans, Continued

Age analysis of past due loans is as follows:


	Accruing Loans
(in thousands)	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Nonaccrual Loans		Total Loans
*At September 30, 2017:*
Real estate mortgage loans:
Commercial	$	626	$	—	$	—	$	626	$	76,458	$	—	$	77,084
Residential and home equity		—		—		—		—		94,145		—		94,145
Construction		—		—		—		—		23,366		—		23,366
Commercial loans		—		—		—		—		46,133		60		46,193
Consumer and other loans		—		—		—		—		6,976		—		6,976

Total	$	626	$	—	$	—	$	626	$	247,078	$	60	$	247,764

*At December 31, 2016:*
Real estate mortgage loans:
Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	65,805	$	—	$	65,805
Residential and home equity		371		—		—		371		87,850		662		88,883
Construction		—		—		—		—		19,918		73		19,991
Commercial loans		—		—		—		—		46,264		76		46,340
Consumer and other loans		—		—		—		—		4,275		—		4,275

Total	$	371	$	—	$	—	$	371	$	224,112	$	811	$	225,294

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(3)

Loans, Continued

The following summarizes the amount of impaired loans:


	With No Related Allowance Recorded				With an Allowance Recorded						Total
(in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Related Allowance
*At September 30, 2017:*
Commercial loans	$	—	$	—	$	137	$	137	$	137	$	137	$	137	$	137

Total	$	—	$	—	$	137	$	137	$	137	$	137	$	137	$	137

*At December 31, 2016:*
Real estate mortgage loans:
Residential and home equity	$	662	$	662	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	662	$	662	$	—
Construction loans		73		73		—		—		—		73		73		—
Commercial loans		—		—		76		76		76		76		76		76

Total	$	735	$	735	$	76	$	76	$	76	$	811	$	811	$	76

The average net investment in impaired loans and interest income recognized and received on impaired loans are as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2017						2016
(in thousands)	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Interest Income Received		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Interest Income Received
Real estate mortage loans:
Residential and home equity	$	—	$	6	$	—	$	361	$	—	$	—
Construction		63		1		1		88		—		—
Commercial loans		22		—		—		1		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		7		—		—

Total	$	85	$	7	$	1	$	457	$	—	$	—


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017						2016
(in thousands)	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Interest Income Received		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Interest Income Received
Real estate mortgage loans:
Residential and home equity	$	375	$	28	$	28	$	119	$	—	$	—
Construction		66		1		2		91		—		—
Commercial loans		56		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		3		—		—

Total	$	497	$	29	$	30	$	213	$	—	$	—

There were no collateral dependent loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at September 30, 2017 or September 30, 2016.

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(3)

Loans, Continued

The restructuring of a loan constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if the creditor grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider in the normal course of business. A concession may include an extension of repayment terms which would not normally be granted, a reduction in interest rate or the forgiveness of principal and/or accrued interest. All TDRs are evaluated individually for impairment on a quarterly basis as part of the allowance for loan losses calculation.

For the three-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, there were no new loans determined to be TDRs. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017, there was one new loan determined to be a TDR.


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
(in thousands)	Number of Contracts		Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Current Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
*Troubled Debt Restructurings -*
Residential and home equity:
Modified principal		1	$	153	$	169	$	165

Total		1	$	153	$	169	$	165

At September 30, 2017, the Company had $225,000 in loans identified as TDRs.

(4)

Regulatory Capital

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(4)

Regulatory Capital, Continued

Effective January 1, 2015, the Bank, became subject to the new Basel III capital level threshold requirements under the Prompt Corrective Action regulations with full compliance with all of the final rule’s requirements phased in over a multi-year schedule. These new regulations were designed to ensure that banks maintain strong capital positions even in the event of severe economic downturns or unforeseen losses.

Changes that could affect the Bank going forward include additional constraints on the inclusion of deferred tax assets in capital and increased risk weightings for nonperforming loans and acquisition/development loans in regulatory capital. Under the new regulations in the first quarter of 2015, the Bank elected an irreversible one-time opt-out to exclude accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from regulatory capital. Beginning January 1, 2016, the Bank became subject to the capital conservation buffer rules which place limitations on distributions, including dividend payments, and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. In order to avoid these limitations, a bank must hold a capital conservation buffer above its minimum risk-based capital requirements. As of September 30, 2017, the Bank’s capital conservation buffer exceeds the minimum requirement designated for September 30, 2017 of 1.25%. The required buffer is to be phased in over three years.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and percentages (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of September 30, 2017 that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

As of September 30, 2017, the Bank is well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as adequately capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage percentages as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category. The Bank’s actual capital amounts and percentages are also presented in the following table.


	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					For Well Capitalized Purposes
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		Percentage			Amount		Percentage			Amount		Percentage
As of September 30, 2017
Tier 1 Leverage Capital	$	32,345		9.38	%	$	13,791		4.00	%	$	17,238		5.00	%
Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-based Capital		32,345		12.76			11,407		4.50			16,477		6.50
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital		32,345		12.76			15,210		6.00			20,280		8.00
Total Risk-based Capital		35,417		13.97			20,280		8.00			25,350		10.00

As of December 31, 2016
Tier 1 Leverage Capital		25,994		8.73			11,906		4.00			14,883		5.00
Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-based Capital		25,994		11.70			9,995		4.50			14,437		6.50
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital		25,994		11.70			13,326		6.00			17,769		8.00
Total Risk-based Capital		28,772		12.95			17,769		8.00			22,211		10.00

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(5)

Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share, (“EPS”) have been computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, outstanding stock options are considered dilutive securities for purposes of calculating diluted EPS which was computed using the treasury stock method.


	2017						2016
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	Earnings		Weighted- Average Shares		Per Share Amount		Earnings		Weighted- Average Shares		Per Share Amount
*Three Months Ending September 30:*
Basic EPS:
Net earnings	$	822		3,100,309	$	0.26	$	610		1,985,201	$	0.31
Effect of dilutive securities-incremental shares from assumed conversion of options				3,235						2,965

Diluted EPS:
Net earnings	$	822		3,103,544	$	0.26	$	610		1,988,166	$	0.31

*Nine Months Ending September 30:*
Basic EPS:
Net earnings	$	2,123		2,569,375	$	0.83	$	1,574		1,980,046	$	0.79
Effect of dilutive securities-incremental shares from assumed conversion of options				9,218						9,376

Diluted EPS:
Net earnings	$	2,123		2,578,593	$	0.83	$	1,574		1,989,422	$	0.79

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(6)

Stock Option Plans

The 2015 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2015 Plan”) was approved by the Shareholders at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders on May 20, 2015 and permits the Company to grant the Company’s key employees and directors stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, and phantom stock. Under the 2015 Plan, the number of shares which may be issued is 500,000, but in no instance more than 15% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. As of September 30, 2017, 11,540 stock options have been granted under the 2015 Plan. At September 30, 2017, 453,658 options are available for grant.


	Number of Options		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2016		—		—
Options granted		11,540	$	17.03

Outstanding at September 30, 2017		11,540	$	17.03		4.34 years	$	6,600

Exercisable at September 30, 2017		11,540	$	17.03		4.34 years	$	6,600

The fair value of shares vested and recognized as compensation expense was $15,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. There was no share based compensation expense during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. At September 30, 2017, there was no unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the 2015 Plan.

The fair value of each option granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:


Weighted average risk-free interest rate		1.48	%
Expected dividend yield		0.40	%
Expected stock volatility		8.54	%
Expected life in years		3.00
Per share fair value of options issued during period	$	1.26

The Company used the guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 to determine the estimated life of options issued. Expected volatility is based on volatility of similar companies’ common stock. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The dividend yield is based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend payouts.

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(6)

Stock Option Plans, Continued

As of May 20, 2015, no further grants will be made under the 2007 Stock Option Plan (the “2007 Plan”). Unexercised stock options that were granted under the 2007 Plan will remain outstanding and will expire under the terms of the individual stock grant. A summary of the activity in the Company’s 2007 Stock Option Plan is as follows:


	Number of Options			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2015		75,500		$	10.19
Options exercised		(7,500	)		11.00
Options forfeited		(7,500	)		10.00

Outstanding at September 30, 2016		60,500		$	10.11

Outstanding at December 31, 2016		42,200		$	10.16
Options exercised		(2,600	)		10.00
Options forfeited		(200	)		10.00

Outstanding at September 30, 2017		39,400		$	10.17		1.68 years	$	293,000

Exercisable at September 30, 2017		38,900		$	10.17		1.64 years	$	289,000

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, there was no unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the 2007 plan, compared to $1,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The fair value of shares vested and recognized as compensation expense was $1,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to less than $500 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The remaining expense is expected to be recognized by December 31, 2017.

In 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors and shareholders adopted the Directors’ Plan. The Directors’ Plan permits the Company’s and the Bank’s directors to elect to receive any compensation to be paid to them in shares of the Company’s common stock. Pursuant to the Directors’ Plan, each director is permitted to make an election to receive shares of stock instead of cash. To encourage directors to elect to receive stock, the Directors’ Plan provides that if a director elects to receive stock, he or she will receive in common stock 110% of the amount of cash fees set by the Board or the Compensation and Nominating Committee. The value of stock to be awarded pursuant to the Directors’ Plan will be the closing price of a share of common stock as traded on the Over-the Counter Bulletin Board, or a price set by the Board or its Compensation and Nominating Committee, acting in good faith, but in no case less than fair market value. The maximum number of shares to be issued pursuant to the Directors’ Plan is limited to 74,805 shares. For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, our directors received 939 and 1,014 shares of common stock, respectively, in lieu of cash fees calculated at 110% to be $16,000 and $15,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, our directors received 3,104 and 2,857 shares of common stock, respectively, in lieu of cash fees calculated at 110% to be $51,000 and $40,000, respectively. At September 30, 2017, 58,910 shares remained available for grant.

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(7)

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances are collateralized by a blanket lien on qualifying residential real estate, commercial real estate, home equity lines of credit and multi-family loans. Under this blanket lien, the Company could borrow up to $25.2 million at September 30, 2017. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had no outstanding loans under this line.

(8)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The estimated fair values and fair value measurement method with respect to the Company’s financial instruments were as follows:


			At September 30, 2017				At December 31, 2016
(in thousands)	Level		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		1	$	34,323	$	34,323	$	36,165	$	36,165
Securities available for sale		2		48,744		48,744		33,103		33,103
Loans held for sale		3		7,459		7,716		3,291		3,500
Loans, net		3		245,160		243,574		222,768		221,320
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		3		316		316		220		220
Accrued interest receivable		3		875		875		798		798
Bank-owned life insurance		3		1,746		1,746		1,711		1,711

Financial liabilities-
Deposits		3		296,714		296,883		275,347		275,433
Off Balance Sheet Items		3		—		—		—		—

Discussion regarding the assumptions used to compute the estimated fair values of financial instruments can be found in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

(9)

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its clients. These financial instruments are commitments to extend credit, construction loans in process, unused lines of credit, standby letters of credit, and guaranteed accounts and may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in these financial instruments.

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(9)

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments, continued

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for available lines of credit, construction loans in process and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit, construction loans in process and unused lines of credit are agreements to lend to a client as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each client’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty.

Standby letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a client to a third party. These letters of credit are primarily issued to support third-party borrowing arrangements and generally have expiration dates within one year of issuance. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to clients. In the event the client does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third party, we would be required to fund the commitment. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount of the commitment. If the commitment is funded, we would be entitled to seek recovery from the client. Some of the Company’s standby letters of credit are secured by collateral and those secured letters of credit totaled $606,000 at September 30, 2017.

Guaranteed accounts are irrevocable standby letters of credit issued by us to guarantee a client’s credit line with our third-party credit card company, First Arkansas Bank & Trust. As a part of this agreement, we are responsible for the established credit limit on certain accounts plus 10%. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make is represented by the dollar amount disclosed in the table below.

Standby letters of credit and commitments to extend credit typically result in loans with a market interest rate when funded.

In 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with another bank. This agreement references an interest rate swap that was transacted between the other bank and its loan client (the “Counterparty”). Should the Counterparty default on its obligations under the interest rate swap agreement with the other bank, then the Company would be liable for 13.208% of all swap liabilities. The maximum potential credit exposure under this contract at September 30, 2017 is $64,000.

(continued)

PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), Continued

(9)

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments, continued

The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make for off-balance sheet financial instruments is represented by the dollar amount disclosed in the table below.


(in thousands)	At September 30, 2017
Commitments to extend credit	$	5,519

Construction loans in process	$	9,099

Unused lines of credit	$	41,231

Standby letters of credit	$	1,697

Guaranteed accounts	$	967

(10)

Public Stock Offering

During the second quarter of 2017, the Company completed a public offering of 1,090,908 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price to the public of $16.50 per share for net proceeds to the Company of approximately $17.0 million. The Company plans to use the net proceeds to fund general corporate purposes, including maintaining liquidity and continuing support of the bank. Net proceeds may also be used for branching or acquisition opportunities in the North Florida, South Georgia, and South Alabama markets.

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s discussion and analysis is presented to aid the reader in understanding and evaluating the financial condition and results of operations of Prime Meridian Holding Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Prime Meridian Bank. This discussion and analysis should be read with the condensed consolidated financial statements, the footnotes thereto, and the other financial data included in this report and in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. Results of operations for the three and Nine months ended September 30, 2017, are not necessarily indicative of results that may be attained for any other period. The following discussion and analysis presents our financial condition and results of operations on a consolidated basis, however, because we conduct all of our material business operations through the Bank, the discussion and analysis relates to activities primarily conducted at the subsidiary level.

Certain information in this report may include “forward-looking statements” as defined by federal securities law. Words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “is confident that,” and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty and a variety of factors could cause our actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements. We do not have a policy of updating or revising forward-looking statements except as otherwise required by law, and silence by management over time should not be construed to mean that actual events are occurring as estimated in such forward-looking statements.

Our ability to predict results or the effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on our and our subsidiary’s operations include, but are not limited to, changes in:

•

local, regional, and national economic and business conditions;

•

banking laws, compliance, and the regulatory environment;

•

U.S. and global securities markets, public debt markets, and other capital markets;

•

monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government;

•

litigation, tax, and other regulatory matters;

•

demand for banking services, both loan and deposit products in our market area;

•

quality and composition of our loan or investment portfolios;

•

risks inherent in making loans such as repayment risk and fluctuating collateral values;

•

competition;

•

attraction and retention of key personnel, including our management team and directors;

•

technology, product delivery channels, and end user demands and acceptance of new products;

•

consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;

•

any failure or breach of our operational systems, information systems or infrastructure, or those of our third-party vendors and other service providers; including cyber-attacks;

•

natural disasters, public unrest, adverse weather, public health, and other conditions impacting our or our clients’ operations;

•

other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, or technological factors affecting us; and

•

application and interpretation of accounting principles and guidelines.

GENERAL

Prime Meridian Holding Company (“PMHG”) was incorporated as a Florida corporation on May 25, 2010, and is the one-bank holding company for, and sole shareholder of, Prime Meridian Bank (the “Bank”) (collectively, the “Company”). The Bank opened for business on February 4, 2008, and was acquired by PMHG on September 16, 2010. PMHG has no significant operations other than owning the stock of the Bank. The Bank offers a broad array of commercial and retail banking services through three full-service offices located in Tallahassee and Crawfordville, Florida and through its online banking platform.

As a one bank holding company, we generate most of our revenue from interest on loans and investments. Our primary source of funding for our loans is deposits. Our largest expenses are interest on those deposits and salaries and employee benefits. We measure our performance through our net interest margin, return on average assets, and return on average equity, while maintaining appropriate regulatory leverage and risk-based capital ratios.

The following table shows selected information for the periods ended or at the dates indicated:


	At or for the
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017			Year Ended December 31, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Average equity as a percentage of average assets		11.31	%		9.47	%		9.62	%
Equity to total assets at end of period		13.45			8.91			9.26
Return on average assets⁽¹⁾		0.87			0.81			0.78
Return on average equity⁽¹⁾		7.68			8.51			8.13
Noninterest expense to average assets⁽¹⁾		2.71			2.80			2.79
Nonperforming loans to total loans at end of period		0.02			0.36			0.51

⁽¹⁾

Annualized for the Nine months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our critical accounting policies which involve significant judgements and assumptions that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, and used in preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2017, have remained unchanged from the disclosures presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Average assets totaled $344.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and $325.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, an increase of $63.6 million, or 22.6%, and $57.2 million, or 21.3%, over the comparable periods in 2016. The increase in 2017 can be primarily attributed to higher average loan balances and the additional capital raised during the second quarter.

Investment Securities. Our primary objective in managing our investment portfolio is to maintain a portfolio of high quality, highly liquid investments yielding competitive returns. We use the investment securities portfolio for several purposes. It serves as a vehicle to manage interest rate and prepayment risk, to generate interest and dividend income, to provide liquidity to meet funding requirements, and to provide collateral for pledging of public funds. At September 30, 2017, our available for sale investment portfolio included U.S. government agency securities, municipal securities, and mortgage-backed securities and had a fair market value of $48.7 million and an amortized cost value of $48.8 million. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, our investment securities portfolio represented approximately 14.1% and 10.9% of our total assets, respectively. The average yield on the average balance of investment securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was 2.18% and 2.25%, respectively, compared to 1.82% and 1.98% for the comparable periods in 2016.

Loans. Our primary earning asset is our loan portfolio and our primary source of income is the interest earned on the loan portfolio. Our loan portfolio consists of commercial real estate loans, construction loans, and commercial loans made to small-to-medium sized companies and their owners, as well as residential real estate loans, including first and second mortgages, and consumer loans. Our goal is to maintain a high quality portfolio of loans through sound underwriting and lending practices. We work diligently to attract new lending clients through direct solicitation by our loan officers, utilizing relationship networks from existing clients, competitive pricing, and innovative structure. Our loans are priced based upon the degree of risk, collateral, loan amount, and maturity. We have no loans to foreign borrowers.

The Company’s net loan portfolio increased $22.4 million, or 10.1% from December 31, 2016. Loan growth occurred across all categories during the first nine months of 2017, with the exception of commercial. In total, approximately 78.5% of the total loan portfolio was collateralized by commercial and residential real estate mortgages at September 30, 2017, compared to 77.5% at December 31, 2016.

Nonperforming assets. We generally place loans on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days or more past due, unless they are well secured and in the process of collection. We also place loans on nonaccrual status if they are less than 90 days past due if the collection of principal or interest is in doubt. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, any interest previously accrued, but not collected, is reversed from income. At September 30, 2017, the Company had one nonaccrual loan totaling $60,000.

Accounting standards require the Bank to identify loans as impaired loans when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. These standards require that impaired loans be valued at the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, using one of the following methods: the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the underlying collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. We implement these standards in our monthly review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, and identify and value impaired loans in accordance with GAAP. Two loans totaling $137,000 were deemed to be impaired under the Bank’s policy at September 30, 2017, compared to four loans totaling $811,000 at December 31, 2016. The Bank’s nonperforming assets represented 0.02% of total assets at September 30, 2017, compared to 0.27% at December 31, 2016.

Allowance for Loan Losses. Management’s policy is to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses, which was $3.1 million or 1.24% of total loans, at September 30, 2017, is adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Two impaired loans carried a reserve of $137,000 at September 30, 2017, while one impaired loan carried a reserve of $76,000 at December 31, 2016. Other impaired loans did not require specific reserves at December 31, 2016, since collateral values less the estimated costs to sell were higher than carrying values.

Deposits. Deposits are the major source of the Bank’s funds for lending and other investment purposes. Total deposits at September 30, 2017 were $296.7 million, an increase of $21.4 million, or 7.8%, from December 31, 2016, with growth coming from both non-interest bearing and interest bearing accounts. The average balance of non-interest bearing deposits accounted for 24.4% of the average balance of total deposits for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to 23.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Borrowings. The Bank has an agreement with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) and pledges its qualified loans as collateral which would allow the Bank, as of September 30, 2017, to borrow up to $25.2 million. In addition, the Bank maintains unsecured lines of credit with correspondent banks that totaled $16.3 million at September 30, 2017. There were no loans outstanding under any of these lines at September 30, 2017.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net interest income constitutes the principal source of income for the Bank and results from the excess of interest income on interest earning assets over interest expense on interest bearing liabilities. The principal interest earning assets are investment securities and loans receivable. Interest bearing liabilities primarily consist of time deposits, interest bearing checking accounts, savings deposits, money-market accounts, and other borrowings. Funds attracted by these interest-bearing liabilities are invested in interest earning assets. Accordingly, net interest income depends upon the volume of average interest earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities as well as the interest rates earned or paid on these assets and liabilities. The following tables set forth information regarding: (i) the total dollar amount of interest and dividend income of the Bank from interest earning assets and the resultant average yields; (ii) the total dollar amount of interest expense on interest bearing liabilities and the resultant average costs; (iii) net interest income; (iv) interest-rate spread; (v) net interest margin; and (vi) weighted-average yields and rates. Yields and costs were derived by dividing annualized income or expense by the average balance of assets or liabilities. The yields and costs depicted in the table include the amortization of fees, which are considered to constitute adjustments to yields.

As shown in the following table, all categories of interest earning assets reported higher volumes and yields for both the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2017. However, a change in the interest earning asset mix offset these increases, resulting in only a slight increase in the overall average yield of interest earning assets for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and a decrease in the average yield of interest earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. This, in combination with higher deposit funding costs, resulted in a decrease in the interest-rate spread and net interest margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 when compared to the same periods a year ago.


	For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	2017								2016
(dollars in thousands)	Average Balance			Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Rate
Interest earning assets:
Loans⁽¹⁾	$	248,678		$	2,972		4.78	%	$	219,665		$	2,539		4.62	%
Mortgage loans held for sale		4,646			53		4.56			3,141			34		4.33
Securities		46,214			252		2.18			34,280			156		1.82
Other⁽²⁾		33,202			114		1.37			14,206			26		0.73

Total interest earning assets		332,740		$	3,391		4.08			271,292		$	2,755		4.06

Non-interest earning assets		11,820								9,697

	$	344,560							$	280,989

Interest bearing liabilities:
Savings, NOW and money-market deposits	$	200,581		$	285		0.57	%	$	165,715		$	177		0.43	%
Time deposits		22,365			41		0.73			22,182			28		0.50

Total interest bearing deposits		222,946			326		0.58			187,897			205		0.44
Other borrowings		—			—					1,217			1		0.33

Total interest bearing liabilities		222,946		$	326		0.58			189,114		$	206		0.44

Non-interest bearing deposits		74,169								63,822
Non-interest bearing liabilities		1,583								1,358
Stockholders’ equity		45,862								26,695

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	344,560							$	280,989

Net earning assets	$	109,794							$	82,178

Net interest income				$	3,065							$	2,549

Interest rate spread							3.50	%							3.62	%
Net interest margin⁽³⁾							3.68	%							3.76	%
Ratio of interest earning assets to average interest bearing liabilities		149.25	%							143.45	%

⁽¹⁾	Includes nonaccrual loans

⁽²⁾	Other interest earning assets include federal funds sold, interest bearing deposits and FHLB stock.

⁽³⁾	Net interest margin is net interest income divided by total average interest earning assets, annualized


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017								2016
(dollars in thousands)	Average Balance			Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance			Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Rate
Interest earning assets:
Loans⁽¹⁾	$	237,240		$	8,379		4.71	%	$	206,585		$	7,211		4.65	%
Mortgage loans held for sale		3,390			119		4.68			2,720			83		4.07
Securities		41,993			709		2.25			36,184			538		1.98
Other⁽²⁾		31,501			271		1.15			13,812			74		0.71

Total interest earning assets		314,124		$	9,478		4.02			259,301		$	7,906		4.07

Non-interest earning assets		11,581								9,235

Total assets	$	325,705							$	268,536

Interest bearing liabilities:
Savings, NOW and money-market deposits	$	196,340		$	722		0.49	%	$	162,524		$	524		0.43	%
Time deposits		20,884			107		0.68			21,246			74		0.46

Deposits		217,224			829		0.51			183,770			598		0.43
Other borrowings		—			—					434			1		0.31

Total interest bearing liabilities		217,224		$	829		0.51			184,204		$	599		0.43

Non-interest bearing deposits		70,254								57,211
Non-interest bearing liabilities		1,384								1,294
Stockholders’ equity		36,843								25,827

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	325,705							$	268,536

Net earning assets	$	96,900							$	75,097

Net interest income				$	8,649							$	7,307

Interest rate spread							3.51	%							3.64	%
Net interest margin⁽³⁾							3.67	%							3.76	%
Ratio of interest earning assets to average interest bearing liabilities		144.61	%							140.77	%

⁽¹⁾	Includes nonaccrual loans

⁽²⁾	Other interest earning assets include federal funds sold, interest bearing deposits and FHLB stock.

⁽³⁾	Net interest margin is net interest income divided by total average interest earning assets, annualized

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

Net Earnings. Net earnings for the three-month period ended September 30, 2017 were $822,000, compared to net earnings of $610,000 for the three-month period ended September 30, 2016. The increase in earnings is attributed to a $636,000, or 23.1%, increase in total interest income, a $76,000, or 70.4%, reduction in the provision for loan losses, and a $40,000, or 9.6% increase in noninterest income, all partially offset by a $120,000, or 58.3%, increase in interest expense, a $291,000, or 15.2%, increase in noninterest expense, and a $129,000, or 38.5%, increase in income taxes.

Net Interest Income. Our operating results depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest and dividend income on interest earning assets such as loans and securities, and interest expense on interest bearing liabilities such as deposits. Net interest income was $3.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $2.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.

Interest Income. Total interest income increased to $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017, a $636,000 or 23.1%, increase over the three months ended September 30, 2016. The increase was driven by an increase in average loans and higher yields. Average loan balances have grown from $219.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 to $248.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, while the average yield on loans increased from 4.62% during the third quarter of 2016 to 4.78% during the third quarter of 2017. Increased income on both securities and other interest earning assets also contributed to the growth in total interest income as both average balances and yields increased. Average securities increased 34.8% year over year, while the average yield on securities increased 36 basis points to 2.18%. The average balance of other interest earning assets also increased year over year. Funds raised during our most recent public stock offering were invested in federal funds sold and accounted for the majority of the $19.0 million increase. Additionally, the Company has benefitted from three 25 basis point increases in the federal funds rate since September 30, 2016.

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $326,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $206,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The $120,000, or 58.3%, increase can be primarily attributed to higher average balances of interest bearing deposits and higher average rates paid on deposits. Year-over-year, the average balance of interest bearing deposits increased 18.7%, or $35.0 million, to $222.9 million, while the average rate paid on deposits increased 14 basis points to 0.58%.

Net Interest Margin. The net interest margin was 3.68% for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to 3.76% for the same period in 2016. Compared to the same period last year, growth in lower yielding other interest earning assets, namely federal funds sold, contributed to a decrease in the net interest margin. The decrease in the net interest margin was also impacted by the higher cost of funds for the quarter.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses is charged to earnings to increase the total loan loss allowance to a level deemed appropriate by management. The provision is based upon the volume and type of lending conducted by the Bank, industry standards, general economic conditions, particularly as they relate to our market area, and other factors related to the collectability of the loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $32,000, compared to $108,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The lower provision reflects changes in the Company’s loan portfolio mix and changes in the qualitative factors used by the Company in determining its provision, as both the Company and its peers have experienced improved asset quality trends in recent periods. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses, which was $3.1 million or 1.24% of total loans, at September 30, 2017, is adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio based on the

assessment of the above-mentioned factors affecting the loan portfolio. While management believes the estimates and assumptions used in its determination of the adequacy of the allowance are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such estimates and assumptions will not be proven incorrect in the future, or that the actual amount of future losses will not exceed the amount of the established allowance for loan losses, or that any increased allowance for loan losses that may be required will not adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the determination of the amount of our allowance for loan losses is subject to review by bank regulators, as part of the routine examination process, which may result in additions to our provision for loan losses based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of examination.

Non-interest Income. Non-interest income consists of revenues generated from a broad range of financial services and activities, primarily service charges and fees on deposit accounts, mortgage banking revenue, income from bank owned life insurance and any gains on the sale of securities available for sale. Non-interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 totaled $455,000 an increase of $40,000, or 9.6%, from the three months ended September 30, 2016. Compared to the same period a year ago, non-interest income increased due to an 8.1% increase in service charges and fees on deposit accounts, a 5.8% increase in mortgage banking revenue, and a 27.5% increase in other income, primarily consisting of higher credit card and debit card income.

Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $291,000, or 15.2%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, compared to the same period a year ago. Salaries, mortgage banking commissions, and employee benefits were the primary expense drivers, increasing $186,000, or 17.5%. Higher occupancy and equipment costs and higher marketing costs also contributed to the growth of non-interest expense quarter over quarter.

Income Taxes. Income taxes are based on amounts reported in the statement of earnings after adjustments for nontaxable income and nondeductible expenses, and consists of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes on temporary differences in the recognition of income and expense for tax and financial statement purposes. Income taxes were $464,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to income taxes of $335,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The higher provision relates to earnings before income taxes of $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to earnings before income taxes of $945,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

Net Earnings. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017, the Company reported net earnings of $2.1 million, compared to $1.6 million for the same period a year ago. The increase in net earnings for the first nine months of 2017 compared to the same period a year ago is attributed to a $1.6 million, or 19.9%, increase in total interest income, a $225,000, or 54.6%, decrease in the provision for loan losses, and a $320,000, or 27.7%, increase in total non-interest income, all partially offset by a $230,000, or 38.4%, increase in total interest expense, a $1.0 million, or 18.1%, increase in total non-interest expense, and a $324,000, or 37.6%, increase in income taxes.

Net Interest Income. Our operating results depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest and dividend income on interest earning assets such as loans and securities, and interest expense on interest bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings. Net interest income was $8.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $7.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Interest Income. Total interest income increased to $9.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, a $1.6 million, or 19.9%, increase over the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Average balances and yields increased across all categories of

interest earning assets year over year, but the interest earned on higher average loan balances was the key contributor to interest income growth. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period a year ago, the average balance of loans increased $30.7 million, or 14.8%, while the average yield on loans increased by 6 basis points. Higher interest income on both securities and other interest earning assets also contributed to the overall gain as both average balances and yields increased. Average securities increased 16.1% year over year, while the average yield increased 27 basis points to 2.25%. The average balance of other interest earning assets also increased year over year. Funds raised during our most recent public stock offering were invested in federal funds sold and accounted for the majority of the $17.7 million increase. Additionally, the Company has benefitted from three 25 basis point increases in the target federal funds rate since September 30, 2016.

Interest Expense. Compared to the same period a year ago, interest expense increased 38.4%, or $230,000, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase can be mostly attributed to higher average balances of interest bearing deposits as well as higher average rates paid on deposits. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the average balance of interest bearing deposits increased 18.2% to $217.2 million while the average rate paid on deposits increased 8 basis points to 0.51%.

Net Interest Margin. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the net interest margin was 3.67%, compared to 3.76% for the same period a year ago. Despite higher average balances of interest earning assets and higher yields in each category, a change in the interest earning assets mix led to a decrease in the overall yield of the interest earning assets portfolio. This in combination with higher average balances of interest bearing deposits and higher deposit funding costs led to the decrease in the Company’s net interest margin.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses is charged to earnings to increase the total loan loss allowance to a level deemed appropriate by management. The provision is based upon the volume and type of lending conducted by the Bank, industry standards, general economic conditions, particularly as they relate to our market area, and other factors related to the collectability of the loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $187,000, compared to $412,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The lower provision reflects changes in the loan portfolio mix as well as changes in the qualitative factors used by the Company in determining its provision, as both the Company and its peers have experienced improved asset quality trends in recent periods.

Management believes that the allowance for loan losses, which was $3.1 million or 1.24% of total loans, at September 30, 2017, is adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio based on the assessment of the above-mentioned factors affecting the loan portfolio. While management believes the estimates and assumptions used in its determination of the adequacy of the allowance are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such estimates and assumptions will not be proven incorrect in the future, or that the actual amount of future losses will not exceed the amount of the established allowance for loan losses, or that any increased allowance for loan losses that may be required will not adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the determination of the amount of our allowance for loan losses is subject to review by bank regulators, as part of the routine examination process, which may result in additions to our provision for loan losses based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

A $306,000, or 48%, increase in mortgage banking revenue, a $67,000, or 38.5%, increase in service charges and fees on deposit accounts, and a $52,000, or 25.2%, increase in other income (mostly credit card and debit card income and ATM fees) were the key drivers to the overall gain in non-interest income in 2017, while the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016 benefitted from a $102,000 gain on sale of securities available for sale.

Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $1.0 million or 18.1%, to $6.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period a year ago. With the exception of professional fees which reported a $50,000, or 17.5% decrease, all other categories of non-interest expense increased in 2017. Salaries, mortgage banking commissions, and employee benefits were the primary expense drivers, increasing $728,000, or 24.2%, for the nine-month period, as the Company continues to add employees to serve its growing client base. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company’s full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) averaged 67 compared to 58 for the same period a year ago.

Income Taxes. Income taxes are based on amounts reported in the statement of earnings after adjustments for nontaxable income and nondeductible expenses, and consists of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes on temporary differences in the recognition of income and expense for tax and financial statement purposes. Income taxes were $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to income taxes of $861,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The higher provision relates to earnings before income taxes of $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to earnings before income taxes of $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity describes our ability to meet financial obligations, including lending commitments and contingencies, which arise during the normal course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to meet the borrowing and deposit withdrawal requirements of the Company’s clients, as well as meet current and planned expenditures. Management monitors the liquidity position daily.

Our liquidity is derived primarily from our deposit base, scheduled amortization and prepayments of loans and investment securities, funds provided by operations, and capital. Additionally, as a commercial bank, we are expected to maintain an adequate liquidity reserve. The liquidity reserve may consist of cash on hand, cash on demand deposit with correspondent banks, federal funds sold, and unpledged marketable securities such as United States government agency securities, municipal securities, and mortgage-backed securities.

The Bank also has external sources of funds through the FHLB, unsecured lines of credit with correspondent banks, and the State of Florida’s Qualified Public Deposit Program (“QPD”). At September 30, 2017, the Bank had access to approximately $25.2 million of available lines of credit secured by qualifying collateral with the FHLB, in addition to $16.3 million in unsecured lines of credit maintained with correspondent banks. As of September 30, 2017, we had no borrowings under any of these lines. Furthermore, some of our securities are pledged to collateralize certain deposits through our participation in the State of Florida’s QPD program. The market value of securities pledged to the QPD program was $9.2 million at September 30, 2017 and $9.3 million at December 31, 2016. Our primary liquid assets, excluding assets pledged to the QPD program, accounted for 21.4% and 19.7% of total assets at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Our core deposits consist of non-interest-bearing accounts, NOW accounts, money market accounts, time deposits $250,000 or less, and savings accounts. We closely monitor our level of certificates of deposit greater than $250,000 and large deposits. At

September 30, 2017, total deposits were $296.7 million, of which $10.3 million was in certificates of deposits greater than $250,000, excluding Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). We maintain a Contingency Funding Plan (“CFP”) that identifies liquidity needs and weighs alternate courses of action designed to address those needs in emergency situations. We perform a monthly cash flow analysis and stress test the CFP to evaluate the expected funding needs and funding capacity during a liquidity stress event. We believe that the sources of available liquidity are adequate to meet all reasonably immediate short-term and intermediate-term demands and do not know of any trends, events, or uncertainties that may result in a significant adverse effect on our liquidity position.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Stockholders’ equity was $46.3 million at September 30, 2017, compared to $27.1 million at December 31, 2016. During the first quarter of 2017, the Board of Directors declared and PMHG paid an annual dividend of $0.07 per share of common stock. During the second quarter of 2017, the Company completed a public stock offering which netted the Company approximately $17 million in additional capital to be used for general corporate purposes, maintaining liquidity and expansionary activities.

At September 30, 2017, the Bank was considered to be “well capitalized” under the FDIC’s Prompt Corrective Action regulations with a 9.38% Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio, a 12.76% Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio, a 12.76% Tier I Risk-Based Capital Ratio, and a 13.97% Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio, all above the minimum ratios to be considered “well-capitalized.”

The following is a summary at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 of the regulatory capital requirements to be “well capitalized” and the Bank’s capital position.


	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					For Well Capitalized Purposes
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		Percentage			Amount		Percentage			Amount		Percentage
As of September 30, 2017
Tier 1 Leverage Capital	$	32,345		9.38	%	$	13,791		4.00	%	$	17,238		5.00	%
Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-based Capital		32,345		12.76			11,407		4.50			16,477		6.50
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital		32,345		12.76			15,210		6.00			20,280		8.00
Total Risk-based Capital		35,417		13.97			20,280		8.00			25,350		10.00

As of December 31, 2016
Tier 1 Leverage Capital		25,994		8.73			11,906		4.00			14,883		5.00
Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-based Capital		25,994		11.70			9,995		4.50			14,437		6.50
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital		25,994		11.70			13,326		6.00			17,769		8.00
Total Risk-based Capital		28,772		12.95			17,769		8.00			22,211		10.00

The Bank is also subject to the following capital level threshold requirements under the FDIC’s Prompt Corrective Action regulations.


Capital Category	Threshold Ratios
Capital Category	Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio			Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio			Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio			Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio
Well capitalized		10.00	%		8.00	%		6.50	%		5.00	%
Adequately Capitalized		8.00	%		6.00	%		4.50	%		4.00	%
Undercapitalized		< 8.00	%		< 6.00	%		< 4.50	%		< 4.00	%
Significantly Undercapitalized		< 6.00	%		< 4.00	%		< 3.00	%		< 3.00	%
Critically Undercapitalized		Tangible Equity/Total Assets £ 2%

Until such time as PMHG has $1 billion in total consolidated assets, it will not be subject to any consolidated capital requirements.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Refer to Note 9 in the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2017 for a discussion of off-balance sheet arrangements

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that PMHG files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based upon management’s evaluation of those controls and procedures performed within the 90 days preceding the filing of this Report, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, subject to the limitations noted below, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by PMHG in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

We intend to continually review and evaluate the design and effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and to improve the Company’s controls and procedures over time and to correct any deficiencies that we may discover in the

future. The goal is to ensure that senior management has timely access to all material financial and nonfinancial information concerning the Company’s business. While we believe the present design of the disclosure controls and procedures is effective to achieve its goal, future events affecting its business may cause the Company to modify its disclosure controls and procedures.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls

We have made no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2017, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

(c) Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are a party to various matters incidental to the conduct of a banking business. Presently, we believe that we are not a party to any legal proceedings in which resolution would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, liquidity, results of operation, cash flows, or capital levels.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

While the Company attempts to identify, manage, and mitigate risks and uncertainties associated with its business to the extent practical under the circumstances, some level of risk and uncertainty will always be present. Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 describes some of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to materially affect our cash flows, results of operations, and financial condition. We do not believe that there have been any material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the third quarter of 2017, the Company issued 939 shares to members of its Board of Directors in lieu of cash fees calculated at 110% to be $16,000. During the third quarter, PMHG issued 2,100 shares to officers and directors who exercised stock options and paid $21,000 upon such exercises. The shares were issued in accordance with the intrastate exemption from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(11) of the Securities Act of 1933, because the Company is doing business within the State of Florida and each acquirer and offeree of securities resides within the State of Florida.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed with or incorporated by reference into this Report.


Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit	Incorporated by Reference From or Filed Herewith

3.1	Articles of Incorporation	Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 18, 2013

3.2	Bylaws	Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 18, 2013

3.3	First Amendment to Bylaws dated December 17, 2015	Exhibit 3.3 to Form 10-Q filed on August 11, 2016

4.1	Specimen Common Stock Certificate	Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 18, 2013

4.2	2010 Articles of Share Exchange	Exhibit 4.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 18, 2013

10.1	2007 Stock Option Plan	Exhibit 10.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 18, 2013

10.2	Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement Under 2007 Plan	Exhibit 10.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 18, 2013

10.3	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement Under 2007 Plan	Exhibit 10.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 18, 2013

10.4	2012 Directors’ Compensation Plan (“Directors’ Plan”)	Exhibit 10.4 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 18, 2013

10.5	Lease for Branch Location on Timberlane Road	Exhibit 10.5 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 18, 2013

10.6	Employment Agreement by and between Prime Meridian Holding Company, Inc., and Prime Meridian Bank, and Sammie D. Dixon, Jr., dated as of July 25, 2016	Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2016

10.7	Amended and Restated 2015 Stock Incentive Compensation Plan	Filed herewith

14.1	Code of Ethics	Exhibit 14.1 to Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2014

21.1	Subsidiaries of the Registrant	Exhibit 21.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 18, 2013

31.1	Certification Under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley by Sammie D. Dixon, Jr., Principal Executive Officer	Filed herewith

31.2	Certification Under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley by R. Randy Guemple, Principal Financial Officer	Filed herewith

32.1	Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley	Filed herewith

99.1	Charter of the Audit Committee	Exhibit 99.1 to Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2014

99.2	Charter of the Compensation and Nominating Committee	Exhibit 99.2 to Form 10-K filed on March 21, 2017

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document	Filed herewith

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	Filed herewith

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	Filed herewith


Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit	Incorporated by Reference From or Filed Herewith

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

*	Furnished, not filed, for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	PRIME MERIDIAN HOLDING COMPANY

November 9, 2017
	By:	/s/ Sammie D. Dixon

Date		Sammie D. Dixon, Jr.
		Chief Executive Officer, President
		and Principal Executive Officer

November 9, 2017
	By:	/s/ R. Randy Guemple

Date		R. Randy Guemple
		Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,
		and Principal Financial Officer

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company