Li3 Energy, Inc. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Li3 Energy, Inc.	Financial_Report.xls
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Li3 Energy, Inc.	v409620_ex32-1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - Li3 Energy, Inc.	v409620_ex32-2.htm
EX-10.1 - EXHIBIT 10.1 - Li3 Energy, Inc.	v409620_ex10-1.htm
EX-10.2 - EXHIBIT 10.2 - Li3 Energy, Inc.	v409620_ex10-2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Li3 Energy, Inc.	v409620_ex31-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Li3 Energy, Inc.	v409620_ex31-2.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number: 000-54303

LI3 ENERGY, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	20-3061907
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

Marchant Pereira 150, Of 802

Providencia, Santiago de Chile, 7500000, Chile

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

+ (56) 2-2896-9100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨		Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨		Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

As of May 15, 2015, there were 474,559,182 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

LI3 ENERGY, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page

Part I - Financial Information

Item 1	Financial Statements	3

Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20

Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	27

Item 4	Controls and Procedures	27

Part II - Other Information

Item 1	Legal Proceedings	28

Item 1A	Risk Factors	28

Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	28

Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	28

Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	28

Item 5	Other Information	28

Item 6	Exhibits	29

Signatures		30

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Actual results may materially differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks and uncertainties set forth in this report. Although management believes that the assumptions made and expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no assurance that the underlying assumptions will, in fact, prove to be correct or that actual results will not be different from expectations expressed in this report.

All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Report including, without limitation, statements in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this Report, regarding our financial condition, estimated working capital, business strategy, the plans and objectives of our management for future operations and those statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “believes,”“expects,”“anticipates,”“intends,”“estimates,”“projects,”“target,”“goal,”“plans,”“objective,”“should” or similar expressions or variations on such expressions are forward-looking statements. We can give no assurances that the assumptions upon which the forward-looking statements are based will prove to be correct. Because forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. There are a number of risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, our ability to identify appropriate corporate acquisition and/or joint venture opportunities in the lithium mining sector, our ability to establish technical and managerial infrastructure, our ability to raise the required capital to take advantage of and successfully participate in such opportunities, and future economic conditions, political stability and lithium prices. Descriptions of certain risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those described by the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q appear in the section captioned “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on September 26, 2014.

Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we disclaim any obligations or undertaking to publicly release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained in this Report to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

LI3 ENERGY, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

	March 31, 2015			June 30, 2014
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	135,678		$	38,490
Prepaid expenses and advances		20,961			35,781
Receivable from BBL for sale of controlling interest in Minera Li		996,851			-
Total current assets		1,153,490			74,271
Receivable from BBL for sale of controlling interest in Minera Li		-			994,017
Equity investment in Minera Li		7,391,639			7,572,425
Property and equipment, net		-			322
Total non-current assets		7,391,639			8,566,764
Total assets	$	8,545,129		$	8,641,035

Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	247,152		$	239,441
Accrued expenses		388,683			805,976
Accrued registration rights penalties		-			518,243
Common stock payable		497,553			291,116
Note payable		-			50,000
Convertible note payable		-			45,000
Current portion of notes payable to BBL		640,000			-
Current portion of derivative liabilities		52,545			142,017
Total current liabilities		1,825,933			2,091,793
Notes payable to BBL		580,000			240,000
Derivative liabilities		11,403			1,706,990
Total non-current liabilities		591,403			1,946,990
Total liabilities		2,417,336			4,038,783

Commitments and contingencies

Common stock subject to rescission, 65,000 shares issued and outstanding		3,041			3,041

Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 990,000,000 shares authorized; 445,657,855 and 435,006,181 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively		445,658			435,006
Additional paid-in capital		71,356,912			70,610,958
Accumulated deficit		(65,677,818	)		(66,446,753	)
Total stockholders’ equity		6,124,752			4,599,211
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	8,545,129		$	8,641,035

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

LI3 ENERGY, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Operating income (expenses):
Exploration expenses	$	-		$	(42,098	)	$	-		$	(47,240	)
Mineral rights impairment expense		-			-			-			(6,485,438	)
Gain on sale of mineral rights		-			-			-			120,000
Loss from Minera Li equity investment		(74,679	)		(5,133	)		(180,786	)		(5,133	)
Debt modification expense		-			-			-			(300,000	)
Gain on settlements, net		-			1,530,285			-			1,536,822
General and administrative expenses		(337,446	)		1,384,967			(1,054,540	)		(1,724,851	)
Total operating income (expenses)		(412,125	)		2,868,021			(1,235,326	)		(6,905,840	)

Other income (expense):
Loss on sale of controlling interest in Minera Li		-			(47,815	)		-			(47,815	)
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment		333,769			(45,594	)		333,769			(19,988	)
Change in fair value of derivative liability instruments		308,221			(2,569,137	)		1,785,059			122,567
Gain on foreign currency transactions		929			30,141			1,436			52,680
Interest expense, net		(42,898	)		(319,885	)		(116,003	)		(1,181,832	)
Total other income (expense)		600,021			(2,952,290	)		2,004,261			(1,074,388	)

Net income (loss)		187,896			(84,269	)		768,935			(7,980,228	)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests		-			320			-			2,596,551
Net income (loss) attributable to Li3 Energy, Inc.	$	187,896		$	(83,949	)	$	768,935		$	(5,383,677	)

Net income (loss) per common share - basic	$	0.00		$	(0.00	)	$	0.00		$	(0.01	)
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted	$	0.00		$	(0.00	)	$	0.00		$	(0.01	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic		443,452,181			426,169,909			439,480,100			408,108,295
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted		444,252,181			426,169,909			440,280,100			408,108,295

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

LI3 ENERGY, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

From July 1, 2013 through March 31, 2015

(Unaudited)

					Additional						Non-			Total
	Common Stock				Paid-in			Deficit			Controlling			Stockholders’
	Shares		Par Value		Capital			Accumulated			Interest			Equity

Balance, July 1, 2013		395,497,453	$	395,497	$	69,327,269		$	(62,613,739	)	$	4,322,154		$	11,431,181

Stock-based compensation:
Amortization of stock-based compensation		-		-		38,207			-			-			38,207
Stock issued pursuant to vesting of restricted stock units		316,666		317		(317	)		-			-			-

Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt		-		-		700,000			-			-			700,000

Stock issued to settle liabilities:
Stock issued to directors and employees for services		13,054,919		13,055		245,276			-			-			258,331
Stock issued to third parties for services		3,620,802		3,621		76,724			-			-			80,345

Stock issued on conversion of debt		22,516,341		22,516		223,799			-			-			246,315

Deconsolidation of Maricunga on sale of controlling interest		-		-		-			-			(1,725,603	)		(1,725,603	)

Net loss		-		-		-			(3,833,014	)		(2,596,551	)		(6,429,565	)

Balance, June 30, 2014		435,006,181	$	435,006	$	70,610,958		$	(66,446,753	)	$	-		$	4,599,211

Stock-based compensation:
Amortization of stock-based compensation		-		-		7,668			-			-			7,668

Stock issued to settle liabilities:
Stock issued to directors and employees for services		10,651,674		10,652		179,848			-			-			190,500

Gain on settlement of registration rights penalties		-		-		558,438			-			-			558,438

Net income		-		-		-			768,935			-			768,935

Balance, March 31, 2015		445,657,855	$	445,658	$	71,356,912		$	(65,677,818	)	$	-		$	6,124,752

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

LI3 ENERGY, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	768,935		$	(7,980,228	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		322			13,415
Loss on write-off of fixed assets		-			4,786
Mineral rights impairment expense		-			6,485,438
Gain on sale of mineral rights		-			(120,000	)
Loss from Minera Li equity investment		180,786			5,133
Loss on sale of controlling interest in Minera Li		-			47,815
Gain on settlements, net		-			(1,536,822	)
Stock-based compensation		154,605			98,328
Gain on debt extinguishment		(333,769	)		19,988
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(1,785,059	)		(122,567	)
Zero coupon interest accretion and amortization of debt discount on convertible notes		-			931,141
Amortization of deferred financing costs		-			30,592
Gain on foreign currency transactions		(1,436	)		(52,680	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in prepaid expenses and advances		15,722			60,574
Increase in receivable from BBL for sale of controlling interest in Minera Li		(2,834	)		-
Increase in accounts payable		8,028			45,393
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses		111,888			428,557
Net cash used in operating activities		(882,812	)		(1,641,137	)

Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sale of controlling interest in Minera Li		-			1,500,000
Deconsolidation of investments		-			(72	)
Proceeds from sale of mining properties		-			60,000
Amounts recovered from minority shareholders		-			1,555,000
Net cash provided by investing activities		-			3,114,928

Cash flows from financing activities
Payments on zero coupon convertible debt		-			(1,930,000	)
Proceeds from notes payable		-			1,088,605
Payments on notes payable		-			(524,776	)
Proceeds from notes payable – BBL		980,000			-
Net cash provided by financing activities		980,000			(1,366,171	)

Net increase in cash		97,188			107,620

Cash at beginning of the period		38,490			12,667

Cash at end of the period	$	135,678		$	120,287

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes	$	-		$	-
Interest	$	2,649		$	138,968
Non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Receivable in connection with sale of mineral rights	$	-		$	60,000
Reclassification of embedded derivative liabilities to additional paid-in capital for conversion of debt	$	-		$	229,390
Debt discount due to beneficial conversion feature	$	-		$	700,000
Debt discount due to warrant derivative liabilities issued with convertible debt	$	-		$	106,000
Payable for acquisition of Cocina Mineral Rights	$	-		$	4,300,000
Settlement of accrued liabilities through issuance of stock	$	43,563		$	289,677
Issuance of common stock on conversion of debt	$	-		$	135,000
Common stock payable to shareholders due to registration rights penalty settlement	$	250,000		$	-
Settlement of registration rights penalty and interest	$	808,438		$	-

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

LI3 ENERGY, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Li3 Energy, Inc. (“Li3 Energy” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 24, 2005. In 2009, the Company established its business focus and strategy toward identifying and pursuing business opportunities in lithium and industrial minerals mining in the Americas.

Part of our strategic plan is to ensure that Minera Li (of which the Company owns a non-controlling interest) explores and develops the existing Maricunga Project in Chile while simultaneously identifying other synergistic opportunities with new projects with production potential that could also be advanced in an accelerated manner, with the goal of becoming a company with valuable lithium, potassium, nitrates and other industrial minerals properties.

The Company’s four wholly owned subsidiaries include: Li3 Energy Peru SRL (“Li3 Peru”), a subsidiary formed in Peru to explore mining opportunities in Peru and in South America; Alfredo Holdings, Ltd. (“Alfredo”), an exempted limited company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands; Li3 Energy Copiapó, SA (“Li3 Copiapó”), a Chilean corporation, which is a subsidiary of Alfredo; and Noto Energy SA (“Noto”), an Argentinean corporation.

On January 27, 2014, the Company entered into a transaction with a third party, BBL SpA (“BBL”), subsequent to which BBL became the majority holder of Minera Li Energy SpA, the Company’s former wholly-owned subsidiary (“Minera Li”), holding 51% of the ownership interest. The Company retains a 49% ownership of Minera Li. Minera Li´s assets include its 60% ownership of SociedadesLegalesMineras Litio 1 a 6 de la Sierra Hoyada de Maricunga (“SLM Litio 1-6”), a group of six private companies (the “Maricunga Companies”), and the Cocina Mining Concessions (together with SLM Litio 1-6, the “Maricunga Project”).

We have generated no revenues to date and do not anticipate generating any revenues in the near term. Our activities have been limited to capital formation, organization, acquisition of interests in mining properties and limited exploration on the Maricunga Project, of which we currently hold a minority interest. The Company´s operations will be subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a developing enterprise and the uncertainties arising from the absence of a significant operating history. We may be unable to locate exploitable quantities of mineral resources or operate on a profitable basis, or we may fail to secure additional funding to support our operations.

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Li3 Energy, Inc. have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, as reported in Form 10-K, have been omitted.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a. Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Li3 Peru, Alfredo, Li3 Copiapó, and Noto. As a result of the Company disposing of its controlling interest in Minera Li on January 27, 2014, the Company deconsolidated Minera Li from its consolidated financial statements and now accounts for its remaining 49% investment in Minera Li under the equity method. All intercompany amounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

b. Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management has made significant estimates related to the fair value of its mineral assets; the fair value of derivative liabilities; stock-based payments; and contingencies.

c. Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of six months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents at March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents.

d. Mineral Exploration and Development Costs

All exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred. Costs of acquisition and option costs of mineral rights are capitalized upon acquisition. Mine development costs incurred to develop new ore deposits, to expand the capacity of mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are also capitalized once proven and probable reserves exist and the property is determined to be a commercially mineable property. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. If the Company does not continue with exploration after the completion of the feasibility study, the cost of mineral rights will be expensed at that time. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to mining costs, including related property and equipment costs. To determine if capitalized costs are in excess of their recoverable amount, periodic evaluation of the carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property and equipment costs are performed based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value . During the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recorded $-0- and $6,485,438, respectively, in mineral rights impairment charges.

e. Impairment of Long-lived Assets

Long-lived assets, including mineral rights, are reviewed for impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. We account for asset impairment in accordance with FASB ASC 360, Property Plant and Equipment. Long-lived assets such as property, plant and equipment, mineral properties and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flow on an undiscounted basis is less than the carrying amount of the related assets. An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on the estimated fair value of the long-lived asset.

f. Investment in Minera Li

Beginning on January 27, 2014, the Company’s investment in Minera Li is accounted for under the equity method in accordance with FASB ASC 323 –Equity Investments and Joint Ventures. Under the equity method, the carrying value of the investment is adjusted for the Company’s share of Minera Li’s earnings and losses, as well as any capital contributions to and distributions from associates. Distributions in excess of equity method earnings are recognized as a return of investment and recorded as investing cash inflows in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. We classify operating income and losses as well as gains and impairments related to our equity investees as a component of operating income or loss, as the Company’s equity investees is an extension of our core business.

We evaluate equity investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the investment may have experienced an ‘‘other-than-temporary’’ decline in value. If such conditions exist, we compare the estimated fair value of the investment to its carrying value to determine if an impairment is indicated and determine whether the impairment is ‘‘other-than-temporary’’ based on an assessment of all relevant factors, including consideration of our intent and ability to retain the investment.

g. Foreign Currency

The Company has determined that the functional currency of the parent company and each of its foreign subsidiaries is U.S. Dollars.

Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in the statement of operations as other income (expense).

h. Income Taxes

A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting and for net operating loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax expense (benefit) results from the net change during the period of deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

For financial statement purposes, we recognize the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained.

The Company recognizes interest related to income tax matters in income tax expense and penalties related to income tax matters in general and administrative expenses. The Company did not include any uncertain income tax positions or accrued interest in its consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2015 or June 30, 2014, and did not recognize any interest in its consolidated statements of operations during the nine months ended March 31, 2015 or 2014. At March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014, the Company has recorded $160,000 and $160,000, respectively, of accrued penalties related to income tax matters.

i. Non-Controlling Interests

The Company is required to report its non-controlling interests as a separate component of equity. The Company is also required to present the consolidated net income or loss and the portion of the consolidated net income or loss allocable to the non-controlling interests and to the stockholders of the Company separately in its consolidated statements of operations. Losses applicable to the non-controlling interests are allocated to the non-controlling interests even when those losses are in excess of the non-controlling interests’ investment basis. During the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recorded a net loss allocable to non-controlling interests of $-0- and $2,596,551, respectively. The non-controlling interests related to the 40% of the Maricunga Companies that were not owned by Minera Li. As a result of the BBL Transaction (see Note 4) during January 2014, BBL became the majority shareholder of Minera Li, with the Company retaining a 49% interest. The Company determined that it ceased to have voting and management control of Minera Li and therefore accounted for the sale of 51% of Minera Li by deconsolidating the subsidiary from its consolidated financial statements in accordance with FASB ASC 810 - Consolidation. The Company´s remaining 49% interest in Minera Li has been treated as an equity investment in accordance with FASB ASC 323 - Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures.

j. Earnings per Share

Basic net earnings per share amounts are computed by dividing the net income available to Li3 Energy, Inc.’s shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding over the reporting period. In periods in which the Company reports a net loss, dilutive securities are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the following convertible debt, stock options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share, as the inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
Stock options		1,450,000		1,450,000
Restricted stock units		-		983,334
Stock warrants		98,590,015		169,500,963
Convertible debt		-		3,517,621
		100,040,015		175,451,918

	Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2015		2014
Stock options		1,450,000		1,450,000
Restricted stock units		-		983,334
Stock warrants		98,590,015		169,500,963
Convertible debt		-		3,517,621
		100,040,015		175,451,918

k. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently issued or adopted accounting pronouncements are not expected to, or did not have, a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

l. Subsequent Events

The Company evaluated material events occurring between March 31, 2015 and the date when the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued for disclosure consideration.

NOTE 3. GOING CONCERN

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had no source of current revenue, a cash balance on hand of $135,678 and negative working capital of $672,443.

Pursuant to the terms of the BBL Transaction and the Shareholders Agreement (described in Note 4), the Company has access to the following sources of funding:

Li3 Energy will receive $1,000,000 upon completion of certain Maricunga Project milestones, or at the latest, on January 27, 2016.

BBL will provide the Company with a credit facility of $1,800,000 to provide Li3 Energy working capital (the “BBL Credit Facility”). The BBL Credit Facility allows the Company to draw $100,000 during May 2014, and $200,000 per month thereafter up to a maximum $1,800,000. The loans are secured by a portion of the Company’s ownership interest in Minera Li. Repayment of each drawdown is 18 months from the drawdown date, at 8.5% interest per annum. As of March 31, 2015, the Company has received $1,220,000 under the BBL Credit Facility.

BBL will finance Li3 Energy´s share of exploration expenses on the Maricunga Project to the stage of full permitting including environmental, social, and construction, and all studies related to the Maricunga Project to internationally recognized standards. The loans will be due 24 months from receipt and interest will accrue at 12% per annum. Specific limits for these loans have not been established and will be negotiated in good faith between the Company and BBL.

The Company’s current negative working capital position is not sufficient to maintain its basic operations for at least the next 12 months.

The Company has no assurance that future financing will be available on acceptable terms. If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, the Company may be unable to continue, develop or expand our operations. Equity financing could result in additional dilution to existing shareholders.

If the Company is unable to develop any of its exploration activities or fails to raise additional capital to maintain its operations in the future, the Company may be unable to carry out its full business plan or it may be forced to cease operations.

In the course of its development activities, the Company has sustained and continues to sustain losses. The Company cannot predict if and when the Company may generate profits. In the event we identify commercial reserves of lithium or other minerals, we will require substantial additional capital to develop those reserves and certain governmental permits to exploit such resources. The Company expects to finance its future operations primarily through future equity or debt financing. However, there exists substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern because there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such capital, through equity or debt financing, or any combination thereof, on satisfactory terms or at all. Additionally, no assurance can be given that any such financing, if obtained, will be adequate to meet the Company’s ultimate capital needs and to support its growth. If adequate capital cannot be obtained on a timely basis and on satisfactory terms, then the Company’s operations would be materially negatively impacted.

The Company’s ability to complete additional offerings is dependent on the state of the debt and/or equity markets at the time of any proposed offering, and such market’s reception of the Company and the offering terms. In addition, the Company’s ability to complete an offering may be dependent on the status of its exploration activities, which cannot be predicted. There is no assurance that capital in any form would be available to the Company, and if available, on terms and conditions that are acceptable.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to obtain the necessary rights to exploit its mineral rights, meet its financial and operational obligations, and obtain additional financing as may be required until such time as it can generate sources of recurring revenues and to ultimately attain profitability. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

NOTE 4. INVESTMENT IN MINERA LI

The Company´s equity investment at March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014 relates to its 49% investment in Minera Li. The investment in Minera Li was consolidated prior to January 27, 2014. The activity of the investment for the period from July 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015 is as follows:

Balance, July 1, 2013	$	-
Add: Fair value of investment in Minera Li recognized on January 27, 2014		7,679,014
Less: Equity in loss of Minera Li		(106,589	)
Balance, June 30, 2014	$	7,572,425
Less: Equity in loss of Minera Li		(180,786	)
Balance, March 31, 2015	$	7,391,639

Minera Li was previously a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. On January 27, 2014, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with BBL (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which BBL acquired 11 of our 60 shares of Minera Li (the “Share Purchase”) for a cash payment of $1,500,000. In connection with the Share Purchase, Minera Li held a shareholders’ meeting, pursuant to which Minera Li issued 40 additional shares (the “Additional Shares”) to BBL (the “Issuance” and together with the “Share Purchase”, the “BBL Transaction”) for $5,500,000. As a result of the BBL Transaction, BBL became the majority shareholder of Minera Li holding 51% ownership, with the Company retaining a 49% interest.

Concurrent with the execution of the Agreement, the Company and BBL also entered into a Shareholders Agreement regarding their joint ownership interest of Minera Li (the “Shareholders Agreement”). Under the Shareholders Agreement, BBL will pay $1,000,000 (the “Additional Payment”) to the Company upon its completion of certain milestones relating to the permitting and development of the Maricunga Project and, in any event, no later than January 27, 2016. The Company recorded the present value of the Additional Payment receivable of $992,443 as receivable on sale of controlling interest in Minera Li in the consolidated balance sheets and will amortize interest income of $7,557 over the life of the receivable. The balance of the receivable from BBL for sale of controlling interest in Minera Li recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014 was $996,851 and $994,017, respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2015, $2,834 of interest income was recognized in our consolidated statement of operations relating to this.

Summarized Financial Information of Minera Li

Set out below is the summarized financial information of Minera Li, which is accounted for using the equity method. The information reflects the amounts presented in the financial statements of Minera Li adjusted for differences in accounting policies between the Company and Minera Li. Our share of income and losses from our equity method investment in Minera Li is included in loss from Minera Li equity investment in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Summarized Balance Sheet

	March 31, 2015		June 30, 2014
Current assets	$	78,977	$	174,613
Non-current assets		17,062,196		17,062,724
Total assets	$	17,141,173	$	17,237,337

Current liabilities	$	330,591	$	57,806
Equity		16,810,582		17,179,531
Total liabilities and equity	$	17,141,173	$	17,237,337

Summarized Statement of Operations

	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2015			Nine Months Ended March 31, 2014
Revenue	$	-		$	-
Operating expenses:
Exploration expenses		(18,791	)		(756	)
General & administrative expenses		(350,160	)		(9,720	)
Total operating expenses		(368,951	)		(10,476	)
Net loss	$	(368,951	)	$	(10,476	)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015			Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
Revenue	$	-		$	-
Operating expenses:
Exploration expenses		(3,305	)		(756	)
General & administrative expenses		(149,101	)		(9,720	)
Total operating expenses		(152,406	)		(10,476	)
Net loss	$	(152,406	)	$	(10,476	)

NOTE 5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following:

	March 31, 2015			June 30, 2014
Leasehold improvement and office equipment	$	1,941		$	1,941
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(1,941	)		(1,619	)
	$	-		$	322

Depreciation expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $322 and $13,415, respectively.

NOTE 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

BBL

Following the BBL Transaction on January 27, 2014, BBL owns 51% of Minera Li with Li3 retaining a 49% ownership interest. BBL is a private Chilean corporation with an objective to advance a business in the production of lithium. BBL is controlled by a Chilean entrepreneur. The BBL Transaction is described in Note 4.

Pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement, BBL agreed to pay an additional payment of $1,000,000 to the Company upon the earlier of its completion of certain project milestones relating to the permitting and development of the Maricunga Project and January 27, 2016. The Company recorded the present value of the additional payment receivable of $992,443 as receivable on sale of controlling interest in Minera Li in the consolidated balance sheets, with interest income of $7,557 to be amortized over the life of the receivable. The balance of the receivable from BBL for sale of its controlling interest in Minera Li recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014 was $996,851 and $994,017, respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, $2,834 and $1,574, respectively, of interest income was recognized in our consolidated statement of operations relating to this receivable.

The Company has entered into the following loan agreements with BBL:

Agreement Date	March 31,2015			June 30, 2014
May 27, 2014	$	100,000		$	100,000
June 20, 2014		140,000			140,000
July 23, 2014		200,000			-
August 27, 2014		200,000			-
October 21, 2014		200,000			-
November 25, 2014		180,000			-
February 3, 2015		200,000			-
Total		1,220,000			240,000
Current portion of notes payable to BBL		(640,000	)		-
Notes payable to BBL	$	580,000		$	240,000

The total interest accrued on the loans from BBL as of March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014 was $51,918 and $1,048, respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, $50,870 and $0, respectively, of interest expense was recognized in our consolidated statement of operations.

The loans from BBL bear an interest rate of 8.5% per annum and are repayable within 18 months from the date of receipt. At March 31, 2015, 13of our 49 shares in Minera Li are guaranteed as security for the loans with BBL.

NOTE 7. NOTE PAYABLE

On June 5, 2008, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to Milestone Enhanced Fund Ltd. (“Milestone”), bearing an interest rate of 8.25% per annum, in the amount of $50,000, due June 5, 2009. During the nine months ended March 31, 2015, the Company recorded a debt extinguishment of $77,290 relating to the extinguishment of the related note payable and interest obligations with Milestone pursuant to this unsecured promissory note.

NOTE 8. CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

On April 30, 2009, the Company issued an unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (the “Convertible Note”) to Milestone, bearing an interest rate of 8.25% per annum, in the amount of $45,000, due November 8, 2010. During the nine months ended March 31, 2015, the Company recorded a debt extinguishment of $66,879 relating to the extinguishment of the related convertible note payable and interest obligations with Milestone pursuant to this Convertible Note.

On May 14, 2013, the Company issued an unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (the “First Asher Note”) to Asher Enterprises, Inc. (“Asher), bearing an interest rate of 8% per annum, in the amount of $158,500 with a Maturity Date of February 17, 2014. Legal expenses incurred in relation to the First Asher Note were $3,500 and were deducted from the gross proceeds received. In accordance with the provisions of the First Asher Note, during the nine months ended March 31, 2014, Asher elected to convert a total of $135,000 in principal amounts of the note into an aggregate of 22,516,341 shares of the Company´s common stock. The Company reclassified the fair value of the embedded conversion feature derivative liability of $148,539 related to these conversions to additional paid-in capital. The principal amount outstanding under the First Asher Note following these conversions was $23,500. The Company paid $33,000 on February 5, 2014 in settlement of principal ($23,500) and interest outstanding ($9,500) on the First Asher Note. The interest expense in respect to the First Asher Note for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 was $7,867. Upon repayment of the note, the Company reclassified the fair value of the embedded conversion feature derivative liability of $20,626 to additional paid-in capital.

On July 15, 2013, the Company issued an unsecured Convertible Promissory Note to Asher (the “Second Asher Note”), bearing an interest rate of 8% per annum, in the amount of $53,000 with a Maturity Date of April 17, 2014. Legal expenses incurred in relation to the Second Asher Note were $3,000 and were deducted from the gross proceeds received. The Company paid $68,376 on January 29, 2014 in settlement of principal ($53,000), interest outstanding ($2,114) and prepayment amount ($13,262) on the Second Asher Note. The interest expense in respect to the Second Asher Note for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 was $15,376 (including $13,262 prepayment amount). Upon repayment of the note, the Company reclassified the fair value of the embedded conversion feature derivative liability of $60,255 to additional paid-in capital.

On January 8, 2014, the Company issued an unsecured Convertible Promissory Note to Asher (the “Third Asher Note”), bearing an interest rate of 8% per annum, in the amount of $53,000 with a Maturity Date of October 10, 2014. The Company received the proceeds from the Third Asher Note on January 22, 2014, net of legal expenses of $3,000. The Company paid $68,022 on June 24, 2014 in settlement of principal ($53,000), interest outstanding ($1,722) and prepayment amount ($13,250) on the Second Asher Note.

Under the terms of the First Asher Note, the Second Asher Note and the Third Asher Note (together the “Asher Notes”), any amount of principal and interest that is not paid when due will be subject to interest of 22% per annum (“Default Interest”). The Asher Notes provide that all or any part of the principal and interest balance due on the Asher Notes are convertible at Asher´s option at any time from 180 days following the dates of the Asher Notes and ending on complete satisfaction of the Asher Notes by payment or conversion.

In the event of default, the Asher Notes are immediately due and payable. The minimum amount due is 150% of the combined outstanding principal and unpaid interest.

The number of shares of common stock to be issued upon conversion shall be determined by dividing the Conversion Amount by the applicable conversion price. The Conversion Amount means the principal amount of the Asher Notes and, at Asher´s option, accrued and unpaid interest, Default Interest, and any other amounts owed to Asher pursuant to the terms of the Asher Notes. The conversion price shall equal the Variable Conversion Price which is calculated as 61% of the Market Price, being the average of the lowest three trading prices for the Company´s common stock during the 10 day period prior to the conversion date. At any one time, Asher will be limited to convert no more than 9.99% of the issued and outstanding common stock at time of conversion.

The conversion price of the Asher Notes is based on a variable that is not an input to the fair value of a “fixed-for-fixed” option as defined under FASB ASC Topic No. 815 - 40. The fair value of the Asher Notes were recognized as derivative instruments at issuance and are measured at fair value at each reporting period. The Company determined that the fair value of the First Asher Note was $198,128 at the issuance date. The value of the debt of $158,500 was recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the First Asher Note. The variance to the fair value of $39,628 was recognized as an initial loss and recorded to change in fair value of derivative liabilities during the year ended June 30, 2013. The Company determined that the fair value of the Second Asher Note was $109,046 at the issuance date. The value of the debt of $53,000 was recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the Second Asher Note. The variance to the fair value of $56,046 on the Second Asher Note was recognized as an initial loss and recorded to change in fair value of derivative liabilities during the nine months ended March 31, 2014. The Company determined that the fair value of the Third Asher Note was $141,549 at the issuance date. The value of the debt of $53,000 was recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the Third Asher Note. The variance to the fair value of $88,549 on the Third Asher Note was recognized as an initial loss and recorded to change in fair value of derivative liabilities during the nine months ended March 31, 2014.

NOTE 9. DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

Warrants

The Company has determined that certain warrants the Company has issued contain provisions that protect holders from future issuances of the Company’s common stock at prices below such warrants’ respective exercise prices and these provisions could result in modification of the warrants exercise price based on a variable that is not an input to the fair value of a “fixed-for-fixed” option as defined under FASB ASC Topic No. 815 - 40.

The warrants issued in our prior offerings and to lenders, POSCAN and for advisory and arranger services contain anti-dilution provisions that provide for a reduction in the exercise price of such warrants in the event that future common stock (or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock) is issued (or becomes contractually issuable) at a price per share (a “Lower Price”) that is less than the exercise price of such warrant at the relevant time. The amount of any such adjustment is determined in accordance with the provisions of the relevant warrant agreement and depends upon the number of shares of common stock issued (or deemed issued) at the Lower Price and the extent to which the Lower Price is less than the exercise price of the warrant at the relevant time. In addition, the number of shares issuable upon exercise of some of these warrants will be increased inversely proportional to any decrease in the exercise price, thus preserving the aggregate exercise price of the warrants both before and after any such adjustment.

The fair values of these warrants were recognized as derivative warrant instruments at issuance or when they become issuable and are measured at fair value at each reporting period. The Company determined the fair values of these warrants using a modified lattice valuation model.

Activity for derivative warrant instruments during the nine months ended March 31, 2015 was as follows:

			Decrease in
	Balance at		Fair Value of			Balance at
	June 30,		Derivative			March 31,
	2014		Liabilities			2015
2009 Unit Offering warrants	$	1,499	$	(1,499	)	$	-
First 2010 Unit Offering warrants		305,483		(305,483	)		-
Second 2010 Unit Offering warrants		46,224		(34,287	)		11,937
Third 2010 Unit Offering warrants		108,685		(86,492	)		22,193
Incentive warrants		110,027		(91,613	)		18,414
Lender warrants		41,372		(30,548	)		10,824
Warrants for advisory services and arranger warrants		2,111		(1,531	)		580
POSCAN warrants		1,233,606		(1,233,606	)		-
	$	1,849,007	$	(1,785,059	)	$	63,948

There were no warrants exercised during the nine months ended March 31, 2015. On September 13, 2014, 38,095,300 of the POSCAN warrants issued on September 14, 2011 expired unexercised. During November and December 2014, 14,618,791 of the outstanding warrants issued pursuant to the 2009 unit offering expired unexercised.

Activity for derivative warrant instruments during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 was as follows:

			Decrease in
	Balance at		Fair Value of			Balance at
	June 30,		Derivative			March 31,
	2013		Liabilities			2014
2009 Unit Offering warrants	$	314,835	$	(166,559	)	$	148,276
First 2010 Unit Offering warrants		361,632		133,205			494,837
Second 2010 Unit Offering warrants		54,411		15,285			69,696
Third 2010 Unit Offering warrants		129,379		27,584			156,963
Incentive warrants		148,289		63,151			211,439
2011 Unit Offering warrants		190,100		(190,100	)		-
Lender warrants		52,929		10,342			63,271
Warrants for advisory services and arranger warrants		10,933		(7,734	)		3,199
POSCAN warrants		2,522,794		(61,258	)		2,461,536
	$	3,785,302	$	(176,084	)	$	3,609,218

There were no warrants exercised during the nine months ended March 31, 2014.

The following is a summary of the assumptions used in the modified lattice valuation model as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively:

	Valuation as of
	March 31,
	2015			2014
Common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants		98,590,015			169,500,963
Market value of common stock on measurement date (1)	$	0.0129		$	0.0277
Adjusted exercise price	$	0.04-$0.28		$	0.04-$0.29
Risk free interest rate (2)		0.14%-0.26	%		0.07%-0.44	%
Warrant lives in years		0.19-1.09			0.0 – 2.0
Expected volatility (3)		167%-197			211%-307%
Expected dividend yields (4)		None			None
Assumed stock offerings per year over next two years (5)		1			1
Probability of stock offering in any year over next two years (6)		100	%		100	%
Range of percentage of existing shares offered (7)		22%-24	%		15% - 27	%
Offering price range (8)	$	0.02 - $0.03		$	0.03 - $0.05

(1)

The market value of common stock is the stock price at the close of trading on the date of issuance or at period-end, as applicable.

(2)

The risk-free interest rate was determined by management using the 0.5 or 1 - year Treasury Bill as of the respective offering or measurement date.

(3)

The historical trading volatility was determined by the Company’s trading history.

(4)

Management determined the dividend yield to be -0-% based upon its expectation that it will not pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

(5)

Management estimates the Company will have at least one stock offering in the next two years.

(6)

Management estimates that the probability of a stock offering is 100% during the next two years.

(7)

Management estimates that the range of percentages of existing shares offered in each stock offering will be between 22% and 24% of the shares outstanding.

(8)

Represents the estimated offering price range in future offerings as determined by management.

Embedded Derivative Instruments

The Company determined that the Asher Notes contained an embedded derivative instrument as the conversion price was based on a variable that was not an input to the fair value of a “fixed-for-fixed” option as defined under FASB ASC Topic No. 815 - 40 (refer Note 8 for further information regarding the Asher Notes). The fair values of the Asher Notes were recognized as derivative instruments at issuance and were measured at fair value at each reporting period. The Company determined that the fair value of the First Asher Note was $198,128 at the issuance date. As the value of the debt at issuance was $158,500, an initial loss of $39,628 was recognized and recorded to change in fair value of derivative liabilities. The Company determined that the fair value of the Second Asher Note was $109,046 at the issuance date. As the value of the debt at issuance was $53,000, an initial loss of $56,046 was recognized and recorded to change in fair value of derivative liabilities during the nine months ended March 31, 2014. The Company determined that the fair value of the Third Asher Note was $141,549 at the issuance date. As the value of the debt at issuance was $53,000, an initial loss of $88,549 was recognized and recorded to change in fair value of derivative liabilities during the nine months ended March 31, 2014.

The Company determined the fair values of the embedded derivatives on the grant dates using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

First Asher Note - stock price on the measurement date of $0.04 per share, term of 0.76 years, expected volatility of 156%, and a discount rate of 0.15%.

Second Asher Note - stock price on the measurement date of $0.028 per share, term of 0.76 years, expected volatility of 156%, and a discount rate of 0.11%.

Third Asher Note - stock price on the measurement date of $0.0085 per share, term of 0.76 years, expected volatility of 223%, and a discount rate of 0.13%.

Activity for embedded derivative instruments during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 was as follows:

			Initial Valuation					Fair Value of
			of Embedded		Increase			Derivative			Fair Value of
			Derivative		(Decrease) in			Liabilities			Derivative
	Balance at		Instruments		Fair Value of			on Conversion			Liabilities			Balance at
	June 30,		Issued During		Derivative			of Debt to			on Repayment			March 31,
	2013		the Period		Liabilities			Common Stock			of Debt			2014
First Asher Note	$	204,547	$	-	$	(35,382	)	$	(148,539	)	$	(20,626	)	$	-
Second Asher Note		-		109,046		(48,821	)		-			(60,225	)		-
Third Asher Note		-		141,549		(6,875	)		-			-			134,674
	$	204,547	$	250,595	$	(91,077	)	$	(148,539	)	$	(80,851	)	$	134,674

At March 31, 2014, the Company determined the fair values of the embedded derivatives using a modified lattice fair value model with the following assumptions: stock price on the measurement date of $0.0277 per share, term of 0.5 years, expected volatility of 307%, and a discount rate of 0.07%.

NOTE 10. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock Issued for Services

On August 5, 2014, the Company issued 329,822 shares of our common stock to its CEO in lieu of $6,250 in salary, $3,125 of which was recorded as common stock payable at June 30, 2014 and $3,125 of which related to salary expenses for July 2014. The Company’s stock price on the issuance date was $0.0205 per share.

Also on August 5, 2014, the Company issued 237,236 shares of our common stock to its CFO in lieu of $4,625 in salary, $2,313 of which was recorded as common stock payable at June 30, 2014 and $2,312 of which related to salary expenses for July 2014. The Company’s stock price on the issuance date was $0.0205 per share.

On September 23, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,474,748 shares of our common stock to its non-employee directors as consideration in lieu of $49,000 of directors’ fees accrued during the year ended June 30, 2014. The Company’s stock price on the issuance date was $0.0185 per share.

Also on September 23, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 286,872 shares in lieu of $6,250 in salary to its CEO and 206,343 shares in lieu of $4,625 in salary to its CFO. The issuances related to salary expenses for August and September 2014. The Company’s stock price on the issuance date was $0.0185 per share.

On November 14, 2014, the Company issued 148,157 shares of common stock to its CEO in lieu of $3,125 in salary, 106,567 shares of common stock to its CFO in lieu of $2,313 in salary and 2,058,824 shares of common stock to its non-employee directors as consideration in lieu of $49,000 of directors’ fees. The Company’s stock price on the issuance date was $0.0105 per share. The number of shares issued was determined based on the average price of the common stock 30 days prior to and including the due date for such fees.

On February 10, 2015, the Company issued 664,887 shares of common stock to its CEO in lieu of $9,375 in salary, 478,243 shares of common stock to its CFO in lieu of $6,938 in salary and 3,576,642 shares of common stock to its non-employee directors as consideration in lieu of $49,000 of directors’ fees. The Company’s stock price on the issuance date was $0.0145 per share. The number of shares issued was determined based on the average price of the common stock 30 days prior to and including the due date for such fees.

Common Stock Payable

On August 17, 2012, the Company closed on POSCAN’s second tranche of investment under a securities purchase agreement, in which it sold 62,499,938 units to POSCAN for gross proceeds of $9,999,990, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and a three-year warrant to purchase one share of common stock for $0.21 per share (the “Additional Agreement”).

The Additional Agreement provided that, subject to certain exceptions, the Company must issue additional shares of our common stock to POSCAN in the event that the Company issued or sold any such shares to third parties for a price of less than $0.16 per share at any time during the 18 months from August 17, 2012 to February 16, 2014. The Company has received waivers of this provision for certain issuances made during that time.

However, during the year ended June 30, 2014, the Company issued 22,516,341 shares of common stock to Asher Enterprises, Inc. on the conversion of $135,000 of debt. Pursuant to the Additional Agreement, the Company estimates it is required to issue an additional 21,672,591 shares to POSCAN with an estimated value of $236,678, which is recorded as common stock payable in the consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014.

At March 31, 2015, the Company has recorded common stock payable of $10,875 in relation to 412,058 shares of our common stock issuable our CEO in lieu of $6,250 in salary and 304,923 shares of common stock issuable to our CFO in lieu of $4,625 in salary. The shares were issued on April 15, 2015.

At March 31, 2015, the Company has recorded common stock payable of $250,000 in relation to 14,970,060 shares of our common stock to be issued in settlement of certain registration rights penalties. The shares were issued on April 14, 2015.

2011 Offering – Registration Rights Penalties

On March 22, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a private placement offering (the “2011 Offering”) to investors of up to $10,000,000 worth of units of securities at an offering price of $0.27 per unit (“G Unit”). Each G Unit consisted of (i) one share of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and (ii) a warrant to purchase one-half of a share of common stock, at an exercise price of $0.40 per whole share (“G Warrant”, or “2011 Unit Offering warrant”).

Pursuant to a registration rights agreement for the 2011 Offering, the Company agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 75 days after the closing date to register the shares of common stock and the shares of common stock underlying the G Warrants under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and to use its best efforts to cause such registration statement to become effective within 150 days after the filing date, all at the Company’s own expense. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, in the event the Company does not meet these deadlines, the Company agreed to pay the investors monetary penalties of 2% of their investment per month until such failures are cured. In accordance with the registration rights agreement, the Company recorded $518,243 of monetary penalties plus accrued interest (recorded in accrued expenses), calculated at 18% per annum for registration rights penalties considered past due.

Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, any amendment, modification or supplement, and waivers or consents to departures from the provisions of the registration rights agreement are required to be in writing and signed by the Company and the holders of 67% or more of the then outstanding shares issued in the 2011 Offering. On September 23, 2014, the Company´s Board of Directors determined to issue shares of common stock in lieu of cash, in an amount up to $250,000 in aggregate, in order to fully settle the monetary registration rights penalties (the “Registration Damages Settlement”). The Registration Damages Settlement would be memorialized in separate agreements entered into by the Company with purchasers in the 2011 Offering (the “Registration Damages Settlement Agreements”). Under the Registration Damages Settlement Agreements, the number of shares to be issued to purchasers of shares issued in the 2011 Offering (“the 2011 PPO Purchasers”) was to be calculated based on the volume weighted average price of the Company´s common stock for the thirty days prior to, and including, the date upon which the Company obtains written approval for the Registration Damages Settlement from shareholders representing 67% or more of the 2011 PPO Purchasers. On March 11, 2015, the Company received signed Registration Damages Settlement Agreements from shareholders representing 67% of the 2011 PPO Purchasers and calculated that 14,970,060 shares valued at $250,000 were to be issued in settlement of the registration rights penalties. At March 31, 2015, the Company has recorded common stock payable of $250,000 and has recognized the difference of $558,438 between the settlement amount of $250,000 and accrued registration rights penalty of $518,243 and accrued interest of $290,195 as additional paid-in capital. The shares were issued on April 14, 2015.

Restricted Stock Units

During December 2011, the Company entered into a one-year employment agreement with a new Vice President of Finance (now called the Chief Financial Officer, the “CFO”) which originally was to begin on January 1, 2012 (amended to March 1, 2012). Pursuant to the agreement, the CFO was granted 250,000 restricted stock units under its 2009 Plan which will vest over 3 years. The value of the issuable shares was determined based on the $0.13 closing price of the common stock on the measurement date, and totaled $34,500. The Company will record stock compensation expense for these restricted stock units over the 3-year service period which began on March 1, 2012. During the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recorded $2,482 and $6,678, respectively, of stock-based compensation in connection with this agreement. As of March 31, 2015, all of the restricted stock units have vested.

The Company has committed to grant Restricted Stock Units with respect to an aggregate of 800,000 shares to members of its Board of Directors. Such restricted stock units shall vest over a period of three years starting from the later of July 1, 2011 and the initial date of the applicable director’s substantial involvement with the Board’s activities. However, the Company does not currently have enough shares authorized for issuance under our 2009 Plan to satisfy all of these obligations. The Company recorded compensation expense of $5,185 and $12,416 during the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Stock Option Awards

A summary of stock option activity is presented in the table below:

					Weighted-
			Weighted-		average
			average		Remaining		Aggregate
	Number of		Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares		Price		Term (years)		Value
Outstanding at June 30, 2014		1,450,000	$	0.22		2.03	$	-
Granted		-		-		-		-
Exercised		-		-		-		-
Expired/Forfeited		-		-		-		-
Outstanding at March 31, 2015		1,450,000	$	0.22		1.28	$	-
Exercisable at March 31, 2015		1,450,000	$	0.22		1.28	$	-

During the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $-0- and $3,593, respectively, related to stock options.

Warrants

Summary information regarding common stock warrants outstanding is as follows:

				Weighted- average
	Number of			Exercise
	Warrants			Price
Outstanding at June 30, 2014		155,635,919		$	0.17
Issued		-
Additional shares issuable upon exercise of warrants as a result of adjustments pursuant to anti-dilution provisions		668,187			0.16
Expired		(57,714,091	)		0.18
Outstanding at March 31, 2015		98,590,015		$	0.16

Warrants outstanding as of March 31, 2015 are as follows:

			Outstanding			Exercisable
	Exercise		Number		Remaining	Number
Issuance Date	Price		of Shares		Life	of Shares
June 9, 2010 - September 13, 2010	$	0.20		15,761,450	0.2 – 0.5 years		15,761,450
June 9, 2010 - July 13, 2010	$	0.13		808,869	0.2 – 0.3 years		808,869
November 8-15, 2010	$	0.04		1,795,006	0.6 years		1,795,006
December 9, 2010 - March 24, 2011	$	0.11		6,494,080	0.7 – 0.9 years		6,494,080
March 24, 2011	$	0.26		7,274,722	1.0 years		7,274,722
May 2, 2011	$	0.25		1,500,000	1.1 years		1,500,000
May 2, 2011	$	0.22		75,000	1.1 years		75,000
August 17, 2012	$	0.15		62,499,938	0.4 years		62,499,938
August 17, 2012	$	0.21		2,380,950	2.4 years		2,380,950
				98,590,015			98,590,015

The warrants outstanding at March 31, 2015 had no intrinsic value.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2015, 57,714,091 warrants expired unexercised.

NOTE 11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

As defined in FASB ASC Topic No. 820 – 10, fair value is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC Topic No. 820 – 10 requires disclosure that establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The statement requires fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. The Company considers active markets as those in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. This category includes those derivative instruments that the Company values using observable market data. Substantially all of these inputs are observable in the marketplace throughout the term of the derivative instruments, can be derived from observable data, or supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.

Level 3: Measured based on prices or valuation models that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and less observable from objective sources (i.e. supported by little or no market activity). The Company’s valuation models are primarily industry standard models. Level 3 instruments include derivative warrant instruments. The Company does not have sufficient corroborating evidence to support classifying these assets and liabilities as Level 1 or Level 2.

As required by FASB ASC Topic No. 820 – 10, financial assets and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. The estimated fair value of the derivative warrant instruments was calculated using a modified lattice valuation model (See Note 9).

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis:

	Quoted Prices
	In Active		Significant
	Markets for		Other		Significant
	Identical		Observable		Unobservable		Total
	Assets		Inputs		Inputs		Carrying
Description	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Value
Derivative liabilities – warrant instruments:
As of March 31, 2015	$	-	$	-	$	63,948	$	63,948
As of June 30, 2014	$	-	$	-	$	1,849,007	$	1,849,007

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of financial liabilities classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:

	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
Beginning balance as of June 30	$	1,849,007		$	3,989,849
Change in fair value		290,432			(1,419,026	)
Additions		-			53,000
Balance as of September 30	$	2,139,439		$	2,623,823
Change in fair value		(1,767,270	)		(1,272,678	)
Fair value of embedded derivative liability reclassified to equity upon conversion of debt to common stock		-			(87,098	)
Balance as of December 31	$	372,169		$	1,264,047
Change in fair value		(308,221	)		2,569,137
Additions		-			53,000
Fair value of embedded derivative liability reclassified to equity upon conversion of debt to common stock and repayment of debt		-			(142,292	)
Ending balance as of March 31	$	63,948		$	3,743,892

Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	$	308,221		$	(2,569,137	)
Change in realized gains included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	$	-		$	142,292
Change in unrealized gains included in earnings for the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	$	1,785,059		$	122,567
Change in realized gains included in earnings for the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	$	-		$	229,390

NOTE 12. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Following is a reconciliation of basic earnings per share (“EPS”) and diluted EPS for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015						Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
	Net				Per Share		Net					Per Share
	Income		Shares		Amount		Loss			Shares		Amount
Basic EPS	$	187,896		443,452,181	$	0.00	$	(83,949	)		426,169,909	$	(0.00	)
Dilutive effect of restricted stock and restricted stock units		173		800,000		-		-			-		-
Diluted EPS	$	188,069		444,252,181	$	0.00	$	(83,949	)		426,169,909	$	(0.00	)

	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2015						Nine Months Ended March 31, 2014
	Net				Per Share		Net					Per Share
	Income		Shares		Amount		Loss			Shares		Amount
Basic EPS	$	768,935		439,480,100	$	0.00	$	(5,383,677	)		408,108,295	$	(0.01	)
Dilutive effect of restricted stock and restricted stock units		5,186		800,000		-		-			-		-
Diluted EPS	$	774,121		440,280,100	$	0.00	$	(5,383,677	)		408,108,295	$	(0.01	)

NOTE 13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 8, 2015, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Saenz Amendment”) to the Employee Services Agreement with its CEO, dated as of August 24, 2011. Pursuant to the Saenz Amendment, the CEO´s term will terminate on December 31, 2015 unless the parties agree in writing to extend the term prior to that date. The CEOshall be paid a base salary of $125,000 per annum for the period April 1, 2015 to June 30, 2015 (reduced from $250,000 per annum) and a base salary of $62,500 per annum for the period July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. The Saenz Amendment also imposes payments and conditions related to certain corporate events. In consideration of the Saenz Amendment, the Company agreed to issue the CEO 8,928,571 shares of common stock of the Company. The shares were issued on April 9, 2015.

Also on April 8, 2015, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 (the “Santillana Amendment”) to the Employee Services Agreement with its CFO, dated as of December 1, 2011 (as amended on April 10, 2012). Pursuant to the Santillana Amendment, the CFO´s term will terminate on December 31, 2015 unless the parties agree in writing to extend the term prior to that date. The CFO shall be paid a base salary of $92,500 per annum for the period April 1, 2015 to June 30, 2015 (reduced from $185,000 per annum) and a base salary of $46,250 per annum for the period July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. The Santillana Amendment also imposes payments and conditions related to certain corporate events. In consideration of the Santillana Amendment, the Company agreed to issue the CFO 4,285,715 shares of common stock of the Company. The shares were issued on April 9, 2015.

On April 14, 2015, the Company issued 14,970,060 shares valued at $250,000 in settlement of registration rights penalties which were recorded as common stock payable at March 31, 2015 (see note 10).

On April 15, 2015, the Company issued 412,058 shares of common stock to its CEO in lieu of $6,250 in salary and 304,923 shares of common stock to its CFO in lieu of $4,625 in salary, which were recorded as common stock payable at March 31, 2015 (see note 10).

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Please see “Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” above and “Risk Factors” included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, filed with the SEC, for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these forward-looking statements.

You should read this discussion and analysis together with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Overview

We are a South America-based exploration company in the lithium and potassium mining sector. We aim to acquire and develop a unique portfolio of lithium and potassium brine projects in the Americas.

All of our mineral rights in SLM Litio 1-6 and the Cocina Mining Concessions (the “Maricunga Project”) are held by Minera Li, of which the Company retains a 49% ownership interest. The controlling interest in Minera Li (51%) is held by a private Chilean company, BBL SpA (“BBL”).

As of March 31, 2015, Minera Li owned (a) a 60% interest in SLM Litio 1-6, which consists of mining concessions covering an area of approximately 1,438 hectares in the Salar de Maricunga in northern Chile; and (b) the Cocina Mining Concessions, covering 450 hectares located adjacent to SLM Litio 1-6.

The Company is currently evaluating additional exploration and production opportunities.

Going Concern

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had no source of current revenue, a cash balance on hand of $135,678 and negative working capital of $672,443.

Pursuant to the terms of the BBL Transaction and the Shareholders Agreement with BBL, the Company has access to the following sources of funding:

·	Li3 Energy will receive $1,000,000 upon completion of certain Maricunga Project milestones, or at the latest, on January 27, 2016.

BBL will provide the Company with a credit facility of $1,800,000 to provide Li3 Energy working capital (the “BBL Credit Facility”). The BBL Credit Facility allows the Company to draw $100,000 during May 2014, and $200,000 per month thereafter, until the maximum $1,800,000 (the “Maximum Amount”) is reached. The loans are secured by a portion of the Company’s ownership interest in Minera Li. Repayment of each drawdown will be 18 months from the drawdown date, at 8.5% interest per annum. As of March 31, 2015, the Company has received $1,220,000 under the BBL Credit Facility.

The Company’s current negative working capital position is not sufficient to maintain its basic operations for at least the next 12 months.

If the Company is unable to complete any phase of its development or exploration activities or fails to raise additional capital to maintain its operations in the future, it may be unable to carry out its full business plan or it may be forced to cease operations.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to obtain the necessary rights to exploit its mineral rights; meet its financial and operational obligations, to obtain additional financing as may be required until such time as it can generate sources of recurring revenues and to ultimately attain profitability. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

Summary of Operations and Financings

BBL

On January 27, 2014, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with BBL, pursuant to which BBL acquired 11 of our 60 shares of Minera Li, previously a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Share Purchase”) for a cash payment of $1,500,000. In connection with the Share Purchase, Minera Li held a shareholders’ meeting, pursuant to which Minera Li issued 40 additional shares to BBL (the “Issuance” and together with the “Share Purchase”, the “BBL Transaction”) for $5,500,000. As a result of the BBL Transaction, BBL became the majority shareholder of Minera Li holding 51% ownership, with the Company retaining a 49% interest.

On July 23, 2014, the Company entered into a loan agreement with BBL pursuant to which BBL agreed to lend the Company an additional $200,000, of which $199,210 was received on August 4, 2014, net of local taxes and fees of $790. On August 27, 2014, the Company entered into a loan agreement with BBL pursuant to which BBL agreed to lend the Company $200,000, of which $199,275 was received on September 10, 2014, net of local taxes and fees of $725. On October 21, 2014, the Company entered into a loan agreement with BBL pursuant to which BBL agreed to lend the Company $200,000, of which $199,247 was received on October 23, 2014, net of local taxes and fees of $753. On November 25, 2014, the Company entered into a loan agreement with BBL pursuant to which BBL agreed to lend the Company $180,000, of which $179,190 was received on December 10, 2014, net of local taxes and fees of $810. On February 3, 2015, the Company entered into a loan agreement with BBL pursuant to which BBL agreed to lend the Company $200,000, of which $199,210 was received on February 5, 2015, net of local taxes and fees of $790.

At March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014, the Company owed BBL $1,220,000 and $240,000, respectively, which are recorded as notes payable (current liabilities of $640,000 and non-current liabilities of $580,000) in the consolidated balance sheets. The total interest accrued on the loans from BBL as of March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2014 was $51,918 and $1,048, respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, $50,870 and $0, respectively, of interest expense was recognized in our consolidated statement of operations.

The loans from BBL bear an interest rate of 8.5% per annum and are repayable within 18 months from the date of receipt. As at March 31, 2015, 13 of our 49 shares in Minera Li are guaranteed as security for the loans with BBL.

Maricunga Project

The Maricunga Project consists of approximately 1,888 hectares, and is located in the northeast section of the Salar de Maricunga, the second largest lithium-bearing salt brine deposit in Chile. It consists of Minera Li´s 60% controlling interest in SLM Litio 1-6 (1,438 hectares) and the Cocina Mining Concessions (450 hectares). As the properties are both undeveloped, at this stage there is no source of power or material plant and equipment located on the properties. Local infrastructure at the Salar de Maricunga includes National Highway 31 and an electrical power line running parallel to the highway.

In May 2012, we reported the completion of a technical report on SLM Litio 1-6 prepared by Donald H. Hains, Principal of Hains Technology and Associates. The technical report demonstrates that SLM Litio 1-6 has high grades of lithium and potassium and recommended the project to advance to the feasibility study stage. The report included the following conclusions and recommendations:

Results of airlift testing and pumping tests on test trenches indicate that future brine production can be achieved through a combination of production wells and open trenches.

The analyses of brine chemistry indicate that the brine is amenable to lithium and potash recovery through conventional technology.

It is believed that through the application of proprietary technology developed by Li3’s strategic partners, lithium recovery from the Maricunga brine can be significantly enhanced and may range from 45 percent to more than 70 percent.

It is the recommendation of the authors that a full feasibility study be completed for the project.

In March 2013, approval of the Environmental Impact Declaration for SLM Litio1-6 was received from the Chilean Environmental Authority. This approval allows Minera Li to advance the development of SLM Litio 1-6 toward a feasibility study.

In Chile, the Chilean Organic Law on Mining Concessions and the Chilean Mining Code (“CMC”) provide that lithium may not be granted in a mining concession initiated after January 1, 1979. As a result, only mining exploitation concessions initiated before January 1, 1979 are authorized for the exploitation of lithium. For all other cases, the CMC establishes the reserve of lithium to Chile and expressly provides that the exploration or exploitation of “non-concessible” substances (including lithium) can be performed only directly by the State of Chile, or its companies, or by means of administrative concessions or special operation contracts, fulfilling the requirements and conditions set forth by the President of Chile for each case. Additionally, Law 16,319, which created the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission (the “NEC”), provides under Article 8that, for reasons of national interest, any act or contract in connection with lithium will require the prior authorization of NEC (or such contract must have NEC as a party thereto). Once the NEC grants any such authorization to an applicant, the NEC may not amend or terminate it, nor may the applicant resign, except as set forth in the authorization.

As the constitution process of the Cocina Mining Concessions was initiated in 1937, lithium exploitation is authorized in the area covered by the Cocina Mining Concessions. However, as the constitution process of SLM Litio 1-6 was initiated in 2000, lithium exploitation is not authorized in the area covered by such concessions. All other minerals on the property are concessible and, as with any mineral exploitation in Chile, all requisite permits must be obtained.

In June 2012, the Chilean Government’s Ministry of Mining established its first ever auction for the award of lithium, production quotas and licenses (Special Lithium Operations Contracts, or “CEOL”) which would permit the exploitation of an aggregate of 100,000 tons of lithium metal (approximately 530,000 tons of lithium carbonate equivalent) over a 20 year period, subject to a seven percent royalty. In September 2012, we formed a consortium consisting of us, POSCO, Daewoo International Corp, and Mitsui & Co. (the “Consortium”) for the purpose of participating in such CEOL auction. The Consortium submitted its bid for the CEOLs and in September 2012, the Company was informed that the Consortium’s bid was not the winning bid.

The Chilean government subsequently decided to invalidate the CEOL process due to an administrative error, as well as rescinding the CEOL Basis, which defined the regulations of the CEOL process. The Company submitted several appeals to the Chilean government requesting it to reconsider the invalidation and award the CEOL to the second highest bidder - the Consortium. The appeals have been rejected by the Chilean government. In June 2014, Chile´s President and Minister of Mining signed a decree for the establishment of the National Lithium Commission, tasked with recommending a new state policy for the exploitation of lithium in Chile. The recommendation was issued in January 2015, following which the Chilean government is to consider working alongside lithium producers in the private sector to develop the country’s lithium reserves, increase production and secure the long term sustainability of Chile’s lithium industry. We believe this is a positive step forward in Minera Li´s continued efforts of seeking a permit to exploit lithium from SLM Litio 1-6.

While Minera Li´s current plan for the Maricunga Project is to exploit lithium and potash from both SLM Litio 1-6 and the Cocina Mining Concessions, if no permit for lithium exploitation is obtained for SLM Litio 1-6, Minera Li plans to produce lithium carbonate and potash from the Cocina Mining Concessions in conjunction with producing potash only from SLM Litio 1-6. The technical report shows that potassium resources are available in these properties. The majority of the past and current technical work performed on the project is applicable to the production of lithium and/or potassium. Potassium exploitation does not require special permits and it is exploitable via regular mining concessions, according to the CMC. Initial estimations suggest that a potash project is economically feasible. However, there can be no assurance that Minera Li will be able to obtain the permits necessary to exploit any minerals that it discovers in a timely manner or at all.

In March 2013, POSCO announced that it has developed a chemical lithium extraction technology that reduces recovery time from around 12 months to less than a few days. According to POSCO, the technology increases the lithium recovery rate from a maximum of 50% using traditional evaporation ponds to more than 80%, and the lithium carbonate produced is more than 99.9% pure. If the Maricunga Project progresses to production stage, Minera Li plans to utilize this technology as the means of extraction in order to gain efficiencies.

The Board of Directors of Minera Li (the “Minera Li Board”) consists of four representatives from BBL and three representatives from Li3. On March 24, 2014, the Minera Li Board formed an Operations and Finance Committee which oversees: (i) the technical work required to advance the Maricunga Project and (ii) the financial aspects of Minera Li.

The Operations and Finance Committee has identified the short term goals to continue the program of exploration on the Maricunga Project as follows:

Stage 1 – Complete an updated technical report in 2015 to include both SLM Litio 1-6 and the Cocina Mining Concessions. Works required include core drilling and pumping tests, monitoring well installations and geophysical, stratigraphic and topographic surveys.

Stage 2 – Complete a Prefeasibility Study (“PFS”).

Minera Li´s technical teams have developed a work program targeted to complete stage 1, with an estimated cost of $1.8 - $2million, of which Li3´s share will be approximately $0.9 - $1million. As part of the work program, data will be collected for the Environmental Impact Assessment Once the PFS is completed, Minera Li will carry out further works towards a feasibility study.

The timeline to complete this technical work on Maricunga will depend on the outcome of the ongoing developments on the legislation over the exploitation of lithium in Chile.

Strategic Plan

Part of our strategic plan is to ensure that Minera Li explores and develops the existing Maricunga Project while simultaneously identifying other synergistic opportunities with new projects with production potential that could also be advanced in an accelerated manner, with the goal of becoming a company with valuable lithium, potassium and other industrial minerals properties. Our primary objective is to become a low cost lithium and potash producer utilizing improved technologies for the extraction of lithium and potash from brines in an accelerated manner. The key to achieving this objective is to become an integrated chemical company through the strategic acquisition and development of lithium and potassium assets, as well as other assets that have by-product synergies.

BBL and the Company are fully committed to advancing Minera Li’s Maricunga Project to the stage of full permitting. While we believe that the laws governing the exploitation of lithium in Chile will change by the time a feasibility study is completed on the Maricunga Project, thus enabling Minera Li to exploit lithium from SLM Litio 1-6, there can be no assurance that this will happen.

Results of Operations

Three months Ended March 31, 2015Compared with Three months Ended March 31, 2014

Revenues

We had no revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Exploration expenses

During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we incurred exploration expenses of $0 and $42,098, respectively.

Loss from Minera Li equity investment

During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we incurred a loss from equity method investments of $74,679 and $5,133, respectively, which reflects our share of the losses incurred by Minera Li for each period.

Gain on settlements, net

During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we recorded a gain on settlement of $-0- and $1,530,285, respectively. The gain incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014 was a result of the receipt of $1,555,000 in settlement of lawsuits between the Company and the SLM Litio 1-6 Minority Shareholders, offset by settlement agreements entered into by the Company with respect to an aggregate of $62,998 of obligations, under which the Company issued an aggregate of 5,043,562 shares of the Company’s common stock.

General and administrative expenses

Our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted of the following:

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended			Increase
	March 31, 2015		March 31, 2014			(Decrease)
Rent	$	7,166	$	7,809		$	(693	)
Office expenses		2,517		2,410			107
Communications		5,210		5,611			(401	)
Travel expenses		16,978		29,325			(12,347	)
Legal fees		30,822		53,429			(22,607	)
Accounting &finance fees		21,932		21,215			717
Audit fees		9,400		25748			(16,348	)
Other professional fees		57,111		33,020			24,091
Marketing & investor relations		13,849		29,531			(15,682	)
Directors fees		48,959		54,999			(6,040	)
Bank fees		1,182		1,660			(478	)
Salaries & wages		121,649		118,822			2,827
Stock-based compensation		721		(1,809,930	)		1,810,651
Depreciation & amortization		-		1,850			(1,850	)
Penalties		-		40,000			(40,000	)
Other		-		(466	)		466
	$	337,446	$	(1,384,967	)	$	1,722,413

We incurred general and administrative expenses of $337,446 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to negativegeneral and administrative expenses of $1,384,967 for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The increase of $1,722,413 is mainly due to the stock-based compensation of $1,809,930 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as a result of the reversal of an accrual pursuant to the POSCAN anti-dilution provision set out in the Additional Agreement with POSCAN following the repayment of the First and Second Asher Notes. This has been offset by decreases in various expenses including:

•

Legal fees of $22,607 mainly relating to non-recurring fees incurred in the prior period on the BBL transaction ($10,108), closure of Cayman Islands entity ($4,014), closure of Peru entity ($3,518) and legal fees relating to the Asher Notes ($3,000);

•

Audit fees of $16,348 as a result of the reduced audit and review work required following the sale of the controlling interest in Minera Li;

•

Marketing and investor relations of $15,682 due to reduced use of marketing consultants; and

•

Penalties of $40,000 due to a one-time increase in accrual of tax penalties in the prior period for late filing of Form 5471.

Other professional fees increased by $24,091 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014 mainly due to OTCQB registration and annual fees ($12,500) and consulting fees for review of a potential transaction with a third party ($10,350).

Other income (expense)

Other income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $600,021 compared to a loss of $2,952,290 for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The increase in other income is mainly a result of a gain on debt extinguishment of $333,769 incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to a loss on debt extinguishment of $45,594 incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014, a gain on change in fair value of warrant derivative liabilities of $308,221 recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to a loss of $2,569,137 during the three months ended March 31, 2014, and a decrease in net interest expense of $276,987.

A loss on sale of controlling interest in Minera Li of $47,815 was incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014 in relation to the sale of 51% of Minera Li. The loss reflects the difference between the gross proceeds received of $11,897,060 and the net assets of Minera Li on the date of the sale of $11,944,875.

A gain on debt extinguishment of $333,769 was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2015 in relation to the write-off of loans from Milestone of $95,000, accrued interest of $49,169 and the write-off of certain accrued liabilities. A loss on debt extinguishment of $45,594 was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2014 in relation to the settlement of the zero-coupon convertible notes as a result of the unamortized issue discount and beneficial conversion feature.

During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we recorded a gain of $308,221 on the change in fair value of derivative liability - warrant instruments, compared to a loss of $2,569,137during the three months ended March 31, 2014. The change in fair value of our derivative warrant liability has no impact on our cash flows from operations and was primarily a result of our stock price decreasing during the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to an increase in our stock price during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we recorded a loss on foreign currency transactions of $929 and $30,141, respectively. The activity during both periods was related to our operations in Chile and Peru. The loss for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was significantly higher than the loss for the three months ended March 31, 2015 due to the translation of loan funds received in Canadian Dollars during that period.

Net interest expense amounted to $42,898 and $319,885 during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, a decrease of $276,987. The decrease is mainly due to non-recurring interest in the prior period on the 2013 Credit Facility of $21,023 and the Asher Notes of $15,277, reduced interest on registration rights penalties of $7,775, and a reduction in amortization of debt discount on (i) the zero-coupon convertible notes of $209,516, and (ii) the Asher Notes of $47,474. These decreases have been offset by interest on the notes payable to BBL of $26,395 during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Nine months ended March 31, 2015 Compared with Nine months ended March 31, 2014

Revenues

We had no revenues during the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

Exploration expenses

During the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we incurred exploration expenses of $0 and $47,240, respectively.

Mineral rights impairment expense

During the nine months ended March 31, 2014, we incurred impairment expense of $6,485,438 as a result of the Company executing the BBL Transaction in January 2014, under which BBL acquired 51% of Minera Li. The Company determined that the BBL Transaction provided additional evidence regarding the estimated fair value of SLM Litio 1-6 at December 31, 2013, and in accordance with ASC 855 - Subsequent Events, recognized the impairment charge to reduce the carry amount of the mineral rights to the estimated fair value. There was no mineral rights impairment expense incurred during the nine months ended March 31, 2015.

Gain on sale of mineral rights

On December 16, 2013, the Company sold the Amarillo Ocho and Amarillo Diez mining concessions to a third party for $120,000. Such concessions were acquired by the Company in 2012, and the sales price was recognized as other income during the nine months ended March 31, 2014.

Loss from Minera Li equity investment

During the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we incurred a loss from equity method investments of $180,786, and $5,133, respectively, which reflects our share of the losses incurred by Minera Li for each period.

Debt modification expense

A debt modification expense of $300,000 was recorded during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 as a result of deferring a payment due in July 2013 for acquisition of the Cocina Mining Concessions and as agreed on the extinguishment of the debt with the sellers of the Cocina Mining Concessions. There was no such expense incurred during the nine months ended March 31, 2015.

Gain on settlements, net

During the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we recorded a gain on settlement of $-0- and $1,536,822, respectively. The gain incurred during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 is a result of the receipt of $1,555,000 in settlement of lawsuits between the Company and the SLM Litio 1-6 Minority Shareholders, offset by settlement agreements entered into by the Company with respect to an aggregate of $271,498 of obligations, under which the Company issued an aggregate of 14,731,276 shares of the Company’s common stock..

General and administrative expenses

Our general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted of the following:

	Nine Months Ended			Nine Months Ended		Increase
	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014		(Decrease)
Rent	$	23,691		$	32,713	$	(9,022	)
Office expenses		4,235			12,418		(8,183	)
Communications		14,278			23,344		(9,066	)
Travel expenses		74,541			60,271		14,270
Legal fees		110,271			428,454		(318,183	)
Accounting &finance fees		51,948			63,895		(11,947	)
Audit fees		37,855			114,013		(76,158	)
Other professional fees		118,646			153,446		(34,800	)
Marketing & investor relations		72,358			60,042		12,316
Directors fees		158,958			166,998		(8,040	)
Bank fees		4,974			4,180		794
Salaries & wages		378,220			450,619		(72,399	)
Stock-based compensation		7,668			98,328		(90,660	)
Depreciation & amortization		322			13,415		(13,093	)
Penalties		-			40,000		(40,000	)
Other		(3,425	)		2,715		(6,140	)
	$	1,054,540		$	1,724,851	$	(670,311	)

We incurred general and administrative expenses of $1,054,540 for the nine months ended March 31, 2015 compared to general and administrative expenses of $1,724,851 for the nine months ended March 31, 2014. The decrease of $670,311 is mainly comprised of decreases in:

•

Legal fees of $318,183 mainly relating to non-recurring fees incurred in the prior period on the potential Blue Wolf transaction ($221,718), the lawsuit against the minority shareholders of SLM Litio 1-6 ($66,901), a potential transaction with a third party ($10,928) and Argentinean corporate matters, consisting of provision of company director services and general advice ($10,088);

•

Audit fees of $76,158 as a result of the reduced audit and review work required following the sale of the controlling interest in Minera Li;

•

Other professional fees of $34,800 mainly due to non-recurring professional fees incurred in the prior period with regard to due diligence performed on potential transaction with a third party ($29,608), Tom Currin retainer ($25,000), various consulting fees for Maricunga ($21,222), and a reduction in the Directors &Officers insurance premium ($9,136). These reductions have been offset by fees incurred during the current period on exchange listing application ($10,491), OTCQB registration and annual fee ($12,500), due diligence performed on potential transaction with a third party ($17,700) and capital expenditure report prepared by PEC ($6,718);

•

Salaries & wages of $72,399 due to the resignation of the Marketing VP in August 2013 ($11,214) and the resignation of the Chile Manager in December 2013 ($63,600);

•

Stock-based compensation of $90,660 due to the reversal of the POSCAN anti-dilution provision of $65,024 on the repayment of the Asher Notes and reduced amortization of stock-based compensation of $25,636 as the stock units and options granted reach their vesting date; and

•

Penalties of $40,000 due to one-off increase in accrual of tax penalties in the prior period.

Other income (expense)

Other income for the nine months ended March 31, 2015 was $2,004,261 compared to other expense of $1,074,388 for the nine months ended March 31, 2014. The increase in other income is mainly a result of a gain on debt extinguishment of $333,769 incurred during the nine months ended March 31, 2015 compared to a loss on debt extinguishment of $19,988 incurred during the nine months ended March 31, 2014, an increase in gain on change in fair value of warrant derivative liabilities of $1,662,492and a decrease in net interest expense of $1,065,829.

A loss on sale of investments of $47,815 was incurred during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 in relation to the sale of 51% of Minera Li. The loss reflects the difference between the gross proceeds received of $11,897,060 and the net assets of Minera Li on the date of the sale of $11,944,875.

A gain on debt extinguishment of $333,769 was recorded during the nine months ended March 31, 2015 in relation to the write-off of loans from Milestone of $95,000, accrued interest of $49,169, and the write-off of certain accrued liabilities. We recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $19,988 for the nine months ended March 31, 2014. A loss on debt extinguishment of $23,906 was recognized when the Company entered into a Third Amendment Agreement with the holders of the zero-coupon convertible notes whereby the terms of the notes were extended and the conversion price was reduced from $0.095 to $0.02 per share, and a loss on debt extinguishment of $45,594 was recorded in relation to the settlement of the zero-coupon convertible notes. This loss was partially offset by a gain of $49,512 recorded in relation to the extinguishment of the long term debt payable to the Sellers of the Cocina Mining Concessions.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we recorded gains of $1,785,059 and $122,567, respectively, on the change in fair value of derivative liability - warrant instruments. The change in fair value of our derivative warrant liability has no impact on our cash flows from operations and was primarily a result of our stock price decreasing during each of the nine-month periods.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, gains on foreign currency transactions amounted to $1,436 and $52,680, respectively, in relation to our operations in Peru and Chile.The loss for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 was significantly higher than the loss for the nine months ended March 31, 2015 due to the translation of loan funds received in Canadian Dollars during that period.

Net interest expense amounted to $116,003 and $1,181,832 during the nine months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, a decrease of $1,065,829. The decrease is mainly due to non-recurring interest in the prior period from the zero-coupon convertible notes of $33,631, the 2013 Credit Facility of $54,434, the sellers of the Cocina Mining Concessions of $26,942, and the Asher Notes $23,381 and amortization of debt discount on the zero-coupon convertible notes of $730,536, on the Asher Notes of $200,604 and amortization of deferred financing cost of long term debt of $30,592. These decreases have been offset by interest of $50,870 on the notes payable to BBL during the nine months ended March 31, 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We are primarily engaged in exploration and acquisition of new properties and do not generate income from operations currently. As of March 31, 2015, our only source of liquidity had been debt and equity financing.

Under the Shareholders Agreement with BBL, BBL will pay an Additional Payment of $1,000,000 to the Company upon the earlier of its completion of certain Project Milestones relating to the permitting and development of the Maricunga Project and January 27, 2016. We expect to use some of the proceeds received from the Additional Payment to repay loans under the BBL Credit Facility (described below).

Also under the Shareholders Agreement, BBL agreed to finance the Company’s exploration and development expenses until the Maricunga Project reaches full permitting and is ready for construction, by providing loans due 24 months from receipt at an interest rate of 12% per annum. The loans will be secured by a portion of the Company’s ownership interest in Minera Li. Specific limits on amounts that may be borrowed under these loans have not been established and will be negotiated in good faith between BBL and the Company.

In addition to the foregoing financing, BBL has committed to provide the Company with the BBL Credit Facility with a Maximum Amount of $1,800,000. The BBL Credit Facility will be available from May 2014 and can be drawn down by the Company as follows: (i) $100,000 beginning in May 2014 and (ii) $200,000 every month thereafter, until the Maximum Amount is reached. Each drawdown must be repaid within 18 months of the drawdown date, at 8.5% interest per annum. The BBL Credit Facility is secured by a portion of the Company’s ownership interest in Minera Li. The proceeds of the BBL Credit Facility will be used for the working capital needs of the Company. Through March 31, 2015, BBL has loaned the Company $1,220,000.

The Company’s current negative working capital position is not sufficient to maintain its basic operations for at least the next 12 months.

Although the Company continues to seek investment in certain other mining properties, any such properties that we may acquire will require exploration and development that could take years to complete before it begins to generate revenues. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in acquiring such properties or that if we do complete acquisitions, properties acquired will be successfully developed to the revenue producing stage. If we are not successful in our proposed mining operations, our business, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition will suffer materially.

Various factors outside of our control, including the price of lithium, potassium nitrate and other minerals, overall market and economic conditions, the volatility in equity markets may limit our ability to raise the capital needed to execute our plan of operations. These or other factors could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital. As a result of an inability to raise additional capital, our short-term or long-term liquidity and our ability to execute our plan of operations could be significantly impaired.

Common Stock Subject to Rescission

On March 19, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective a registration statement that we had filed to cover the resale of shares previously issued and sold (or to be issued upon the exercise of warrants). On March 1, 2013, we filed a post-effective amendment for that registration statement that included our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2012 as had been filed on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 (the “2012 Annual Report”). We believe that the filing of the post-effective amendment fulfilled our obligation to update the registration with current financial information pursuant to Section 10(a)(3) of the Act. However, there were approximately six months when our registration statement contained financial information that was not current. During that period, 65,000 shares sold pursuant to that prospectus in open market transactions which may have violated Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and, as a result, the purchasers of those shares may have rescission rights or claims for damages. Accordingly, we have reduced shareholders’ equity at March 31, 2015 by $3,041, the total amount that we would have to refund if all the purchasers of those shares exercised their rescission right.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a smaller reporting company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide disclosure under this Item 3.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure of controls and procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of March 31, 2015. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.

Changes in internal controls over financial reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm business.

We are currently not aware of any pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which any of our property is the subject, nor are we aware of any such proceedings that are contemplated by any governmental authority.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Form 10-K we filed with the SEC on September 26, 2014, under Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” therein.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In March 2015, we entered into agreements (the “Registration Damages Settlement Agreements”) with certain shareholders (the “Penalty Shareholders”) of the Company who participated in a private placement with the Company in April and May of 2011 (the “2011 Private Placement”). Under the Registration Damages Settlement Agreements, we agreed to issue shares of our common stock to the Penalty Shareholders as consideration for the cancellation of certain liabilities owed by the Company to such shareholders. These liabilities were owed to the Penalty Shareholders due to the Company’s failure to register the resale of shares of Common Stock purchased by the Penalty Shareholders within the time limits set forth in certain registration rights agreements (the “Registration Rights Agreements”) entered into between the Company and each of the Penalty Shareholders in connection with the 2011 Private Placement.

Our Board of Directors approved the payment of penalties accrued by the Company to the Penalty Shareholders in shares of Common Stock in lieu of cash, in an amount equal to $250,000, amounting to $0.0167 per share. On April 14, 2015, we issued an aggregate of 14,970,060 shares to the Penalty Shareholders. The issuance of the Penalty Shares was made in reliance on the exemptions from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and Regulation S promulgated under the Act.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Mine Safety and Health Administration Regulations

We consider health, safety and environmental stewardship to be a core value for the Company.

Our Chilean exploration properties are not subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the United States are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities. During the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2015, despite the fact Li3 Energy, Inc. is outside the Mine Act jurisdiction, the Company had no such specified health and safety violations, orders or citations, related assessments or legal actions, mining-related fatalities, or similar events in relation to our operations requiring disclosure pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Title

10.1		Form of Registration Damages Settlement Agreement between Registrant and certain shareholders of the Company who participated in a private placement with the Company in April and May of 2011

10.2		Loan Contract and Pledge Without Transfer of Possession between BBL SpA and the Company, dated February 3, 2015

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14(a) and 15(d) - 14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14(a) and 15(d) - 14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Schema

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 15, 2015	LI3 ENERGY, INC.

	By:	/s/ Luis F. Saenz
		Luis F. Saenz
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

	By:	/s/ Luis Santillana
		Luis Santillana
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

*Exhibit* *Number*		Exhibit Title

10.1		Form of Registration Damages Settlement Agreement between Registrant and certain shareholders of the Company who participated in a private placement with the Company in April and May of 2011

10.2		Loan Contract and Pledge Without Transfer of Possession between BBL SpA and the Company, dated February 3, 2015

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14(a) and 15(d) - 14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14(a) and 15(d) - 14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101. INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Schema

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase

Li3 Energy, Inc. - FORM 10-Q - May 15, 2015

Attached files

Li3 Energy, Inc. Reports