Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - BRE PROPERTIES INC /MD/Financial_Report.xls
EX-12 - STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS - BRE PROPERTIES INC /MD/d373748dex12.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 - BRE PROPERTIES INC /MD/d373748dex322.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 - BRE PROPERTIES INC /MD/d373748dex312.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 - BRE PROPERTIES INC /MD/d373748dex321.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 - BRE PROPERTIES INC /MD/d373748dex311.htm
EX-11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS - BRE PROPERTIES INC /MD/d373748dex11.htm
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 1-14306

 

 

BRE PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

 

Maryland   94-1722214

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

525 Market Street

4th Floor

San Francisco, CA

  94105-2712
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

(415) 445-6530

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

N/A

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large Accelerated Filer   x    Accelerated Filer   ¨
Non-Accelerated Filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller Reporting Company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

 

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of July 30, 2012    76,799,575

 

 

 


Table of Contents

BRE PROPERTIES, INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

June 30, 2012

 

         Page No.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION   
 

ITEM 1. Financial Statements:

  
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets – June 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011

   3
 

Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) – three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

   4
 

Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) – six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

   5
 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) – six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

   6-7
 

Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

   8-17
 

ITEM 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   17-25
 

ITEM 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   25
 

ITEM 4: Controls and Procedures

   26
PART II OTHER INFORMATION   
 

ITEM 1: Legal Proceedings

   27
 

ITEM 1A: Risk Factors

   27
 

ITEM 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

   27
 

ITEM 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities

   27
 

ITEM 4: (Removed and Reserved)

   27
 

ITEM 5: Other Information

   27
 

ITEM 6: Exhibits

   28
SIGNATURES    29
EXHIBIT INDEX    30


Table of Contents

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1—Financial Statements.

BRE Properties, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

 

 

     June 30,
2012
    December 31,
2011
 
     (unaudited)        

Assets

    

Real estate portfolio:

    

Direct investments in real estate:

    

Investments in rental communities

   $ 3,630,399      $ 3,607,045   

Construction in progress

     310,231        246,347   

Less: accumulated depreciation

     (775,909     (729,151
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     3,164,721        3,124,241   

Equity investment in real estate joint ventures

     62,118        63,313   

Land under development

     124,288        101,023   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total real estate portfolio

     3,351,127        3,288,577   

Cash

     2,968        9,600   

Other assets

     54,645        54,444   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 3,408,740      $ 3,352,621   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

    

Liabilities:

    

Unsecured senior notes

   $ 690,018      $ 724,957   

Unsecured line of credit

     251,000        129,000   

Mortgage loans payable

     742,463        808,714   

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     65,715        63,273   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     1,749,196        1,725,944   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

     8,107        16,228   

Shareholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 2,159,715 shares with $25 liquidation preference issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

     22        22   

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 76,795,641 and 75,556,167 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

     768        756   

Additional paid-in capital

     1,871,530        1,818,064   

Cumulative dividends in excess of accumulated net income

     (220,883     (208,393
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

     1,651,437        1,610,449   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

   $ 3,408,740      $ 3,352,621   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See condensed notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

BRE Properties, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

     For the Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2012      2011  

Revenues

     

Rental income

   $ 94,299       $ 87,913   

Ancillary income

     3,824         3,456   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenues

     98,123         91,369   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Expenses

     

Real estate

     30,875         29,232   

Provision for depreciation

     24,850         27,421   

Interest

     16,272         18,739   

General and administrative

     6,211         5,159   

Other expenses

     —           111   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total expenses

     78,208         80,662   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other income

     706         597   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income before noncontrolling interests, income from investments in unconsolidated entities and discontinued operations

     20,621         11,304   

Income for unconsolidated entities

     728         731   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

     21,349         12,035   

Income from discontinued operations, net

     84         741   

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations

     8,279         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

     8,363         741   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

   $ 29,712       $ 12,776   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Redeemable noncontrolling interest in income

     105         335   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income attributable to controlling interests

     29,607         12,441   

Redemption related preferred stock issuance cost

     —           3,616   

Dividends attributable to preferred stock

     911         2,653   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

   $ 28,696       $ 6,172   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Per common share data - Basic

     

Income from continuing operations (net of preferred dividends and redeemable noncontrolling interest in income)

   $ 0.26       $ 0.08   

Income from discontinued operations

   $ 0.11       $ 0.01   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

   $ 0.37       $ 0.09   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic

     76,735         70,025   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Per common share data - Diluted

     

Income from continuing operations (net of preferred dividends and redeemable noncontrolling interest in income)

   $ 0.26       $ 0.08   

Income from discontinued operations

   $ 0.11       $ 0.01   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

   $ 0.37       $ 0.09   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding –diluted

     77,070         70,285   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Dividends declared and paid per common share

   $ 0.385       $ 0.375   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

See condensed notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

 

4


Table of Contents

BRE Properties, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

     For the Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2012      2011  

Revenues

     

Rental income

   $ 187,201       $ 173,234   

Ancillary income

     7,542         6,624   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenues

     194,743         179,858   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Expenses

     

Real estate

     61,725         57,824   

Provision for depreciation

     49,825         51,311   

Interest

     33,490         38,487   

General and administrative

     12,058         10,394   

Other expenses

     —           254   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total expenses

     157,098         158,270   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other income

     1,225         1,202   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income before noncontrolling interests, income from investments in unconsolidated entities and discontinued operations

     38,870         22,790   

Income for unconsolidated entities

     1,456         1,372   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

     40,326         24,162   

Income from discontinued operations, net

     231         1,547   

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations

     8,279         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

     8,510         1,547   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

   $ 48,836       $ 25,709   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Redeemable noncontrolling interest in income

     210         671   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income attributable to controlling interests

   $ 48,626       $ 25,038   

Redemption related preferred stock issuance cost

     —           3,616   

Dividends attributable to preferred stock

     1,822         5,606   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

   $ 46,804       $ 15,816   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Per common share data - Basic

     

Income from continuing operations (net of preferred dividends and redeemable noncontrolling interest in income)

   $ 0.50       $ 0.23   

Income from discontinued operations

   $ 0.11       $ 0.00   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

   $ 0.61       $ 0.23   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic

     76,323         67,760   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Per common share data - Diluted

     

Income from continuing operations (net of preferred dividends and redeemable noncontrolling interest in income)

   $ 0.50       $ 0.23   

Income from discontinued operations

   $ 0.11       $ 0.00   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

   $ 0.61       $ 0.23   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding –diluted

     76,700         68,190   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Dividends declared and paid per common share

   $ 0.770       $ 0.750   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

See condensed notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

 

5


Table of Contents

BRE Properties, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

     For the Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2012     2011  

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

   $ 48,836      $ 25,709   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities:

    

Non cash interest on convertible debt

     36        170   

Gain on sale of discontinued operations

     (8,279     —     

Income from unconsolidated entities

     (1,456     (1,372

Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entities

     2,603        1,906   

Provision for depreciation

     49,825        51,310   

Provision for depreciation from discontinued operations

     76        1,027   

Non cash stock based compensation expense

     2,884        2,194   

Other assets

     (2,171     2,023   

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     774        (2,757
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows provided by operating activities

     93,128        80,210   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Acquisitions of operating real estate communities

     —          (121,366

Additions to land under development and predevelopment cost

     (21,306     (59,137

Additions to construction in progress

     (70,470     (11,483

Rehabilitation expenditures and other

     (12,682     (5,131

Capital expenditures

     (8,033     (9,946

Improvements to real estate joint ventures

     —          (8,744

Proceeds from sale of rental property, net of closing costs

     12,309        —     

Additions to furniture, fixtures and equipment

     —          (54
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows used in investing activities

     (100,182     (215,861
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Principal payments on mortgage loans

     (66,251     (1,050

Repayment of unsecured notes

     (35,000     (48,545

Lines of credit:

    

Advances

     180,000        287,000   

Repayments

     (58,000     (393,000

Cash dividends paid to common shareholders

     (59,294     (52,703

Cash dividends paid to preferred shareholders

     (1,822     (5,606

Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests

     —          (461

Distributions to other noncontrolling interests

     (210     (210

Proceeds from exercises of stock options, net

     1,431        2,153   

Proceeds from dividend reinvestment plan

     508        411   

Redemption of preferred stock

     —          (100,000

Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net

     39,060        448,134   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows provided by financing activities

     422        136,123   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Decrease) Increase in cash

     (6,632     472   

Cash balance at beginning of period

     9,600        6,357   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash balance at end of period

   $ 2,968      $ 6,829   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

6


Table of Contents

BRE Properties, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Cont. (unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

     For the Six Months Ende June 30,  
     2012     2011  

Supplemental disclosure of non cash activities:

    

Transfer of construction in progress to investment in rental properties

   $ 8,868      $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Transfer of net investment in rental properties to held for sale

   $ 3,948      $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Conversion of redeemable noncontrolling interest units

   $ (4,332   $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change in accrued improvements to direct investments in real estate

   $ 173      $ 1,405   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change in accrued development costs for construction in progress and land under development

   $ (1,339   $ (2,015
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change in redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests

   $ (3,789   $ 3,925   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change in redemption related preferred stock issuance cost

   $ —        $ 3,564   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See condensed notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

7


Table of Contents

BRE Properties, Inc.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

June 30, 2012

NOTE A – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements have been omitted. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2011 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 of BRE Properties, Inc. (the “Company” or “BRE”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments only) necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the interim periods presented.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the dates of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

NOTE B – UPDATE OF SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Investments in Rental Communities

Rental communities are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, less an adjustment, if any, for impairment. Costs associated with the purchase of operating communities are recorded to land, building and intangibles when applicable, based on their fair value in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) business combination guidance. Land value is assigned based on the purchase price if land is acquired separately, or estimated fair market value based upon market comparables if acquired in a merger or in an operating community acquisition.

Where possible, the Company stages its construction to allow leasing and occupancy during the construction period, which BRE believes minimizes the duration of the lease-up period following completion of construction. The Company’s accounting policy related to communities in the development and leasing phase is to expense all operating costs associated with completed apartment homes, including costs associated with the lease up of the development. Projects under development are carried at cost, including direct and indirect costs incurred to ready the assets for their intended use and which are specifically identifiable, including capitalized interest and property taxes until homes are placed in service. Interest is capitalized on the construction in progress at a rate equal to the Company’s weighted average cost of debt. The Company has a development group which manages the design, development and construction of apartment communities. Project costs related to the development and construction of apartment communities (including interest and related loan fees, property taxes, and other direct costs including municipal fees, permits, architecture, engineering and other professional fees) are capitalized as a cost of the project. Indirect development costs, including salaries and benefits, office rent, and associated costs for those individuals directly responsible for and who spend all of their time on development activities are also capitalized and allocated to the projects to which they relate. Capitalized compensation totaled approximately $2,010,000 and $1,700,000 for the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Capitalized compensation totaled approximately $4,400,000 and $3,300,000 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, respectively. Indirect costs not related to development and construction activity are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as incurred and significant renovations and improvements that increase the value of the community or extend its useful life are capitalized.

Direct investment development projects are considered placed in service as certificates of occupancy are issued and the homes become ready for occupancy. Depreciation begins as homes are placed in service. Land acquired for development is capitalized and reported as Land under development until the development plan for the land is formalized. Once the development plan is finalized and construction contracts are signed, the costs are transferred to the balance sheet line item Construction in progress.

Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which generally range from 35 to 40 years for buildings and three to ten years for other community assets. The determination as to whether expenditures should be capitalized or expensed, and the period over which depreciation is recognized, requires management’s judgment.

In accordance with FASB guidance on accounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, the Company’s investments in real estate are periodically evaluated for indicators of impairment. The evaluation of impairment and the determination of estimated fair value is based on several factors, and future events could occur which would cause management to conclude that indicators of impairment exist and a reduction in carrying value to estimated fair value is warranted. There were no assets for which an adjustment for impairment in value was made in 2012 or 2011.

 

8


Table of Contents

The guidance also requires that the results of operations of any communities that have been sold, or otherwise qualify as held for sale, be presented as discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated financial statements in all periods presented. The community specific real estate classified as held for sale is stated at the lower of its carrying amount or estimated fair value less disposal costs. Depreciation ceases once an asset is classified as held for sale.

Reportable Segments

FASB guidance requires certain descriptive information to be provided about an enterprise’s reportable segments. BRE has determined that each of its operating communities, which comprised 99% of BRE’s consolidated assets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and approximately 99% of its total consolidated revenues for the three and six months ending June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, represents an operating segment. The Company aggregates its operating segments into five reportable segments based upon geographical region for same-store communities, with non same-store communities aggregated into one reportable segment.

“Same-store” communities are defined as communities that have been completed, stabilized and owned by the Company for at least two twelve month periods. The Company defines stabilized as communities that have reached a physical occupancy of at least 93%.

NOTE C – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company measures the value of service based restricted stock awards and performance based restricted stock awards without market conditions at fair value on the grant date, based on the number of units granted and the market value of its common stock on that date. Share-based payment guidance requires compensation expense to be recognized with respect to the restricted stock if it is probable that the service or performance condition will be achieved. As a result, the Company records the fair value, net of estimated forfeitures, as stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. For service based restricted stock awards, the Company evaluates its forfeiture rate at the end of each reporting period based on the probability of the service condition being met. For performance based restricted stock awards without market conditions, the Company records the fair value, net of estimated forfeitures, as stock based compensation expense using the accelerated attribution method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award. The fair value of performance based restricted stock awards with market conditions is determined using a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the grant date fair value. The Company records the fair value of these awards with market conditions, net of estimated forfeitures, as stock based compensation using the accelerated attribution method over the vesting period regardless of whether the market conditions are satisfied in accordance with share-based payment guidance.

The cost related to stock-based compensation included in the determination of consolidated net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 includes all awards outstanding and vested during these periods.

Stock based compensation awards under BRE’s plans vest over periods ranging from one to four years. At June 30, 2012, compensation cost related to unvested awards not yet recognized totaled approximately $14,867,000 and the weighted average period over which it is expected to be recognized is 2.68 years. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, 146,490 restricted shares were awarded and 165,153 restricted shares vested. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, 78,446 stock options were awarded and 146,082 options were exercised.

NOTE D – CONSOLIDATION OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

Arrangements that are not controlled through voting or similar rights are reviewed under the accounting guidance for variable interest entities; or “VIEs.” A company is required to consolidate the assets, liabilities and operations of a VIE if it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

The consolidation analysis for VIEs requires a qualitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE is based on whether the entity has the power to direct matters which most significantly impact the activities of the VIE and has the obligation to absorb losses, or the right to receive benefits, of the VIE which could potentially be significant to the VIE. The guidance requires an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary and also amends the events triggering a reassessment. The guidance was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2010.

Under the guidance, an entity is a VIE and subject to consolidation, if by design a) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by any parties, including equity holders or b) as a group the holders of the equity investment at risk lack any one of the following three characteristics: (i) the power, through voting rights or similar rights to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity. The Company reviewed the consolidation guidance and concluded that its joint venture LLCs are not VIEs. The Company further reviewed the management fees paid to it by its joint ventures and determined that they do not create variable interests in the entities. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had one land purchase option outstanding from third party entities. The Company determined that although they are generally viewed as VIEs, BRE does not have the power to direct matters which most significantly impact the activities of the land parcels or the owners of the land and therefore, consolidation under the guidance is not appropriate.

 

9


Table of Contents

Under applicable accounting guidance, the managing member of a limited liability company, or LLC, is presumed to control the joint venture LLC and must prove non-managing member(s) have certain rights that preclude the managing member from exercising unilateral control. The Company has reviewed its control as the managing partner of the Company’s joint venture assets and concluded that it does not have unilateral control over any of the LLCs managed by the Company. The Company has applied the equity method of accounting to its investments in joint ventures.

BRE consolidates entities not deemed to be VIEs that it has the ability to control. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Company and other controlled subsidiaries. At June 30, 2012, BRE owned 100% of the Operating Company. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

NOTE E – REAL ESTATE PORTFOLIO

FASB guidance on property acquisitions requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction and recognize contingent consideration arrangements and pre-acquisition loss and gain contingencies at their acquisition-date fair value. The acquirer is required to expense, as incurred, acquisition related transaction costs. BRE expenses costs associated with the pursuit of potential acquisitions to General and Administrative expenses. Once an acquisition is probable the costs are categorized and expensed in Other expenses.

Acquisitions

Costs associated with the purchase of operating communities are recorded to land, building and intangibles when applicable, based on their fair value in accordance with FASB business combination guidance. No operating communities were acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

On June 13, 2012, the Company acquired a parcel of land for future development in Pleasanton, California for a purchase price of $11,100,000.

During 2011, BRE acquired three communities totaling 652 homes: Lafayette Highlands, with 150 homes, located in Lafayette, California; The Landing at Jack London Square, with 282 homes, located in Oakland, California; and The Vistas of West Hills, with 220 homes, located in Valencia, California. The aggregate investment in these three communities was $170,127,000. In addition to the communities, the Company acquired two parcels of land for future development in San Francisco, California’s Mission Bay district for a purchase price of $41,400,000; and the Company purchased a 4.4 acre site contiguous to the Company’s existing Park Viridian operating community and its existing second phase land site in Anaheim, California for a purchase price of $5,100,000.

Discontinued operations and dispositions

The results of operations for communities sold during the period or designated as held for sale at the end of the period are required to be classified as discontinued operations if deemed a component of an entity. The community-specific components of net earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include operating results, depreciation expense recognized prior to the classification as held for sale and the net gain or loss on disposal. The Company allocates interest to discontinued operations to the extent that the community was encumbered.

At June 30, 2012, the Company had no assets classified as held for sale.

On May 17, 2012, BRE sold one community, Countryside Village, with 96 homes located in San Diego, CA. The approximate gross proceeds from the sale were $12,600,000, resulting in a net gain of $8,279,000.

During 2011, the Company sold two communities totaling 634 homes: Galleria at Towngate, with 268 homes located in Moreno Valley, California, and Windrush Village, with 366 homes located in Colton, California. The approximate gross proceeds from sale of the two communities were $65,175,000, resulting in a net gain of $14,489,000.

The following is a breakdown of the combined results of operations for the operating communities included in discontinued operations:

 

     Three Months ended
June  30,
    Six Months ended
June  30,
 
     2012     2011     2012     2011  
(amounts in thousands)                         

Rental and ancillary income

   $ 175      $ 2,094      $ 498      $ 4,210   

Real estate expenses

     (72     (837     (191     (1,636

Provision for depreciation

     (19     (516     (76     (1,027
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations, net

   $ 84      $ 741      $ 231      $ 1,547   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gain on sales, net

   $ 8,279      $ —        $ 8,279      $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

   $ 8,363      $ 741      $ 8,510      $ 1,547   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

10


Table of Contents

NOTE F – EQUITY

On February 24, 2010, the Company entered into Equity Distribution Agreements (EDAs) with each of Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, UBS Securities LLC, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (collectively, the “sales agents”) under which the Company may issue and sell from time to time through or to its sales agents shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, 815,045 shares were issued under the EDAs, with an average share price of $49.09 for total gross proceeds of approximately $40,000,000 and total compensation paid to the sales agents of approximately $800,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, 545,348 shares were issued under the EDAs, with an average share price of $45.84 for total gross proceeds of approximately $25,000,000 and total compensation paid to the sales agents of approximately $500,000. During 2011, 1,291,537 shares were issued under the EDAs, with an average share price of $47.55 for total gross proceeds of approximately $61,414,000 and total compensation paid to the sales agents of approximately $1,228,280. As of June 30, 2012, the remaining capacity under the EDAs totals $123,600,000. The Company intends to use any net proceeds from the sale of its shares under the EDAs for general corporate purposes, which may include reducing borrowings under the Company’s unsecured line of credit, the repayment of other indebtedness, the redemption or other repurchase of outstanding debt or equity securities, funding for development activities and financing for acquisitions.

On May 11, 2011, the Company completed an equity offering of 9,200,000 shares of common stock, including shares issued to cover over-allotments, at $48.00 (prior to a $1.92 per share underwriters discount) per share. Total gross proceeds from this offering were approximately $441,508,000. The Company used the proceeds, net of the discount, of approximately $423,936,0000 for general corporate purposes which included redeeming its 6.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and a portion of its 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, and to repay borrowings under its unsecured line of credit.

On August 15, 2011, the Company repurchased 840,285 shares of its 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a price of $24.33 per share on the open market, a $0.67 discount to par resulting in a non cash return from preferred shareholders of $563,000. In addition, the initial issuance costs associated with these shares totaling $718,000 were charged to retained earnings during the third quarter of 2011. The net effect of the activity was a $155,000 charge to retained earnings for the three months ending September 30, 2011. As of June 30, 2012, 2,159,715 shares of 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock remain outstanding.

On June 13, 2011, the Company redeemed all 4,000,000 shares of its 6.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.34688 per share. The redemption price was equal to the original issuance price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date. The initial issuance costs totaling approximately $3,616,000 associated with this series of perpetual preferred stock were charged to retained earnings during the second quarter of 2011.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, 253,410 net shares of common stock were issued under the Company’s stock-based compensation plans, 10,137 shares of common stock were issued under the Company’s direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan and 160,882 operating company units were converted to shares of common stock.

 

11


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity- Rollforward for Six Months ended June 30, 2012

(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

      June 30,
2012
 
Common Stock Shares   

Balance at beginning of year

     75,556,167   

Common stock issuance

     815,045   

Operating company units converted for common stock(1)

     160,882   

Stock options exercised, net of shares tendered

     146,082   

Vested restricted shares, net of shares tendered

     107,328   

Shares issued pursuant to dividend reinvestment plan

     10,137   
  

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

     76,795,641   
  

 

 

 

Preferred stock shares

  

Balance at beginning of year

     2,159,715   
  

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

     2,159,715   
  

 

 

 

Common stock

  

Balance at beginning of year

   $ 756   

Common stock issuance

     8   

Operating company units converted for common stock

     1   

Stock options exercised

     2   

Vested restricted shares

     1   
  

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ 768   
  

 

 

 

Preferred stock

  

Balance at beginning of year

   $ 22   
  

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ 22   
  

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

  

Balance at beginning of year

   $ 1,818,064   

Common stock issuance, net

     39,051   

Operating company units converted for common shares

     4,332   

Change in market value of redeemable noncontrolling interests

     3,789   

Stock options exercised, net of shares tendered

     4,538   

Shares retired for tax withholding

     (2,982

Stock based compensation

     4,357   

Dividend reinvestment plan

     508   

Other

     (127
  

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ 1,871,530   
  

 

 

 

Cumulative dividends in excess of accumulated net income

  

Balance at beginning of year

   $ (208,393

Net income

     48,836   

Cash dividends declared to common shareholders

     (59,294

Cash dividends declared to preferred shareholders

     (1,822

Other noncontrolling interest in income

     (210
  

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ (220,883
  

 

 

 

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

  

Balance at beginning of year

   $ 16,228   

Other noncontrolling interests in income

     210   

Distributions to other noncontrolling interests

     (210

Conversion activity (1)

     (4,332

Change in redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests

     (3,789
  

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ 8,107   
  

 

 

 

 

(1) 

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the remaining 160,882 operating company units were converted to shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

12


Table of Contents

NOTE G – LEGAL MATTERS

The Company is involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business for which losses are expected to be covered under the Company’s insurance policies. As of June 30, 2012, the risk of material loss from such legal actions impacting the Company’s financial condition or results from operations has been assessed as remote.

NOTE H – DEBT

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company exercised its right to redeem for cash all of the $35,000,000 outstanding convertible senior unsecured notes, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes outstanding, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, February 21, 2012.

On February 1, 2012, the Company prepaid a mortgage on a single community for $65,866,000 prior to its scheduled maturity, with no prepayment penalty.

Through December 31, 2011 the Company maintained an unsecured line of credit with a total commitment of $750,000,000. Based on its then current debt ratings, the line of credit accrued interest at LIBOR plus 47.5 basis points. In addition, the Company paid a 0.15% annual facility fee on the capacity of the facility. Borrowings under the Company’s unsecured line of credit totaled $129,000,000 at December 31, 2011. Borrowings under the unsecured line of credit were used to fund acquisition and development activities as well as for general corporate purposes. Balances on the unsecured line of credit were typically reduced with available cash balances. This facility was terminated subsequent to December 31, 2011.

On January 5, 2012, the Company entered into a new $750,000,000 unsecured line of credit (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement has an initial term of 39 months, terminates on April 3, 2015 and replaces the previous $750,000,000 unsecured line of credit. Based on the Company’s current debt ratings, the line of credit accrues interest at LIBOR plus 120 basis points. In addition, the Company pays a 0.20% annual facility fee on the capacity of the facility. Borrowings under the Company’s unsecured line of credit totaled $251,000,000 at June 30, 2012. Borrowings under the unsecured line of credit were used to fund development activities as well as for general corporate purposes. Balances on the unsecured line of credit are reduced with available cash balances.

The Company’s indebtedness contains financial covenants as to minimum net worth, interest coverage ratios, maximum secured debt, total debt to capital, and cash on hand among others. The Company was in compliance with all such financial covenants during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

The following is a consolidated summary of BRE’s unsecured senior notes and secured debt as of June 30, 2012 (in thousands):

 

Year of Maturity

   Unsecured Senior
Note Balance
     Mortgage
Loans Payable Balance
     Interest  Rate
(Coupon)
 

February 2013

   $ 40,018       $ —           7.13

August 2013

     —           30,508         5.33

March 2014

     50,000         —           4.70

March 2017

     300,000         —           5.50

May 2019

     —           310,000         5.57

September 2019

     —           32,480         5.74

April 2020

     —           59,475         5.20

September 2020

     —           310,000         5.69

March 2021

     300,000         —           5.20
  

 

 

    

 

 

    
   $ 690,018       $ 742,463      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

13


Table of Contents

NOTE I – NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment with updated guidance on how to present items of net income, items of other comprehensive income (OCI) and total comprehensive income that should be applied retrospectively for public entities beginning with interim and annual periods after December 15, 2011. The amendment requires companies to present a total for comprehensive income in a single continuous statement or two separate consecutive statements. Companies will no longer be allowed to present OCI solely in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Earnings per share would continue to be based on net income. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Company’s financial statements in the first half of fiscal year 2012.

In May 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standards update to amend fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. generally accepted accounting standards (US GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which aligns the principles for fair value measurements and the related disclosure requirements under US GAAP and IFRS. This standard requires new disclosures, with a particular focus on Level 3 measurements, including; quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used for all Level 3 measurements; qualitative discussion about the sensitivity of recurring Level 3 measurements to changes in the unobservable inputs disclosed, including the interrelationship between inputs and a description of the company’s valuation processes. This standard also requires disclosure of any transfers between Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy; information about when the current use of a non-financial asset measured at fair value differs from its highest and best use and the hierarchy classification for items whose fair value is not recorded on the balance sheet but is disclosed in the notes. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company has concluded that there is no impact on the financial statements as a result of adopting the guidance in the first half of the fiscal year of 2012.

NOTE J – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments (including such items in the financial statement captions as cash, other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and lines of credit) approximate their carrying or contract values based on their nature, terms and interest rates that approximate current market rates. The fair value of the Company’s Level 2 mortgage loans payable and unsecured senior notes is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses with an interest rate similar to that of current market borrowing arrangements. The estimated fair value of the Company’s mortgage loans and unsecured senior notes is approximately $1,600,712,000 at June 30, 2012. The balance sheet carrying value of these Level 2 liabilities was $1,432,481,000 as of June 30, 2012.

Under FASB guidance, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e. the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments’ complexity. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated statement of financial condition are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by the FASB and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:

Level 1 — Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. The types of assets and liabilities classified as Level 1 fair value generally are G-7 government and agency securities, equities listed in active markets, investments in publicly traded mutual funds with quoted market prices and listed derivatives.

Level 2 — Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level 1) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated life. Fair valued assets that are generally included in this category are stock warrants for which there are market-based implied volatilities, unregistered common stock and thinly traded common stock.

Level 3 — Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model. Generally, assets carried at fair value and included in this category include stock warrants for which market-based implied volatilities are not available.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company’s redeemable noncontrolling interests that have a conversion feature are required to be marked to redemption value at each reporting period. The maximum redemption amount of the redeemable noncontrolling interests is contingent on the fair value of the Company’s common stock at the redemption date, and therefore the amount reported on the consolidated balance sheets is calculated based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock as of the balance sheet date. Since the valuation is based on

 

14


Table of Contents

observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, redeemable noncontrolling interests are classified as Level 2. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, all outstanding operating company units recorded in redeemable noncontrolling interests were converted to shares of common stock, and a decrease in redeemable noncontrolling interests of $3,789,000 was recorded to adjust the noncontrolling interest to its final redemption value with an offsetting change in additional paid in capital. There was an increase in redeemable noncontrolling interests of $3,925,000 for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, to adjust the noncontrolling interest to its redemption value with an offsetting change in additional paid in capital. As of June 30, 2012, no operating company units remain outstanding. As of June 30, 2012, there is $8,107,000 of other noncontrolling interest stated at redemption value.

The estimated fair values of investment securities classified as deferred compensation plan investments are based on quoted market prices utilizing public information for the same transactions or information provided through third-party advisors and are therefore classified as Level 1. The Company’s deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in other assets and totaled $4,027,884 and $3,668,000 at June 30, 2012 and at December 31, 2011.

There were no transfers of assets measured at fair value between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

NOTE K – SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company’s operating and investment activities are primarily focused on the major metropolitan markets within the state of California, and in the metropolitan area of Seattle, Washington. The Company’s segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing such segments’ performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is comprised of several members of its executive management team who use net operating income (NOI) as a primary financial measure for same-store communities and other communities. “Same-store” communities are defined as communities that have been completed, stabilized and owned by us for at least two twelve month periods. The company defines stabilized as communities that have reached a physical occupancy of at least 93%. A comparison of operating results for same-store communities is meaningful as these communities have stabilized occupancy and operating expenses, there is no plan to conduct substantial redevelopment activities and the community is not held for disposition within the current year.

The Company’s business focus is the ownership, development and operation of multifamily communities; The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources primarily based on the NOI of an individual multifamily community. The Company defines NOI as the excess of all revenue generated by the community (primarily rental revenue) less direct real estate expenses. Accordingly, NOI does not take into account community-specific costs such as depreciation, capitalized expenditures and interest expense.

To better understand the Company’s overall results, the 75 wholly or majority owned apartment communities can be characterized as follows:

 

   

19,878 homes in 70 communities were owned, completed and stabilized for all of 2012 and 2011 (“same-store”) communities;

 

   

270 homes in one development community, which was experiencing lease up and stabilization during 2012 and 2011 and as a result did not have comparable year-over-year operating results (“non same-store”); and

 

   

652 homes in three communities acquired during 2011 and which, as a result, did not have comparable year-over-year operating results (“non same-store”); and

 

   

440 homes in one community that was moved from same-store into rehabilitation during 2011.

 

15


Table of Contents

Operating results are aggregated into five reportable segments based upon geographical region for same-store communities, with non same-store communities aggregated into one reportable segment. The following table details rental revenue and NOI for the Company’s reportable segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and reconciles NOI to income from continuing operations per the consolidated statement of operations:

 

     For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
     For the Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
($ in thousands)    2012      2011      2012      2011  

Total Revenues (1):

           

Same-store communities

           

Southern California (2)

   $ 54,152       $ 52,361       $ 107,962       $ 103,949   

San Francisco Bay Area

     19,193         17,755         38,066         34,990   

Seattle

     13,437         12,419         26,418         24,430   

Non-Core Markets (3)

     3,920         3,771         7,732         7,479   

Non Same-store communities (4)

     7,421         5,063         14,565         9,010   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 98,123       $ 91,369       $ 194,743       $ 179,858   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net Operating Income:

           

Same-store communities

           

Southern California (2)

   $ 37,277       $ 35,963       $ 74,065       $ 71,036   

San Francisco Bay Area

     13,904         12,755         27,570         24,859   

Seattle

     8,653         7,906         17,199         15,882   

Non-Core Markets (3)

     2,477         2,399         4,859         4,747   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Same-store net operating income

     62,311         59,023         123,693         116,524   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non Same-store communities (4)

     4,937         3,114         9,325         5,510   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total community net operating income

   $ 67,248       $ 62,137       $ 133,018       $ 122,034   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other income

     706         597         1,225         1,202   

Income from unconsolidated entities

     728         731         1,456         1,372   

Income from discontinued operations, net

     84         741         231         1,547   

Net gain on sales of discountinued operations

     8,279         —           8,279         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net operating income

   $ 77,045       $ 64,206       $ 144,209       $ 126,155   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Less:

           

Provision for depreciation

     24,850         27,421         49,825         51,311   

Interest

     16,272         18,739         33,490         38,487   

General and administrative

     6,211         5,159         12,058         10,394   

Other expenses

     —           111            254   

Dividends attributable to preferred stock

     911         2,653         1,822         5,606   

Redemption related preferred stock issuance cost

     —           3,616         —           3,616   

Redeemable and other noncontrolling interests in income

     105         335         210         671   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

   $ 28,696       $ 6,172       $ 46,804       $ 15,816   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table details the assets of the Company’s reportable segments (dollars in thousands):

 

                   As of June 30, 2012     As of December 31, 2011  
     Communities      Homes      Asset Value     Asset Value  

Assets

          

Southern California (2)

     42         11,625       $ 2,056,686      $ 2,054,984   

San Francisco Bay Area

     12         3,495         606,987        602,724   

Seattle

     13         3,456         516,794        514,882   

Non-Core Markets (3)

     3         1,302         130,250        129,525   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Same-store communities

     70         19,878         3,310,717        3,302,115   

Non Same-store communities (4)

     5         1,362         319,682        304,930   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Investment in rental communities

     75         21,240       $ 3,630,399      $ 3,607,045   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation

           (775,909     (729,151

Construction in progress

           310,231        246,347   

Equity investment in real estate joint ventures

           62,118        63,313   

Land under development

           124,288        101,023   

Cash

           2,968        9,600   

Other assets

           54,645        54,444   
        

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net assets

         $ 3,408,740      $ 3,352,621   
        

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) 

All revenues are from external customers and no single tenant or related group of tenants contributed 10% or more of the Company’s total revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

(2) 

Consists of 13 communities in San Diego, 5 in Inland Empire, 13 in Los Angeles, and 11 in Orange County.

(3) 

Consists of one same-store community in Sacramento, California and two same-store communities in Phoenix, Arizona.

(4) 

2012 Non same-store communities include: three communities acquired in 2011, one community delivered in 2011, and one community under rehabilitation/redevelopment and commercial net operating income.

 

16


Table of Contents

NOTE L – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated and disclosed subsequent events through the date of the issuance of the financial statements.

ITEM 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, we have made forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These forward-looking statements pertain to, among other things, our capital resources, financial liquidity, portfolio performance and results of operations. Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties. You should not rely on these statements as predictions of future events because there is no assurance that the events or circumstances reflected in the statements can be achieved or will occur. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “pro forma,” “estimates” or “anticipates” or in their negative form or other variations, or by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise or incapable of being realized. The following factors, among others, could affect actual results and future events: defaults or non-renewal of leases, illiquidity of real estate and reinvestment risk, our regional focus in the Western United States, insurance coverage, increased interest rates and operating costs, failure to obtain necessary outside financing, difficulties in identifying communities to acquire and in effecting acquisitions, failure to successfully integrate acquired communities and operations, risks and uncertainties affecting community development and construction (including construction delays, cost overruns, inability to obtain necessary permits and public opposition to such activities), failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, environmental uncertainties, risks related to natural disasters, financial market fluctuations, changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates. Our success also depends upon economic trends, including interest rates, income tax laws, governmental regulation, legislation, population changes and other factors. Do not rely solely on forward-looking statements, which only reflect management’s analysis. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements.

Executive Summary

We are a self-administered equity real estate investment trust, or REIT, focused on the ownership, operation, development, and acquisition of apartment communities. Our operating and investment activities are primarily focused on the major metropolitan markets within the state of California, and in the metropolitan area of Seattle, Washington. Our segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing such segments’ performance.

This table summarizes information about our 2012 operating communities:

 

     Same-store Communities 1     Total Communities 2  

Regions

   # of
Communities
     # of
Homes
     % of
Same-store
Revenue
    % of
Same-store
NOI
    # of
Communities
     # of
Homes
     % of
Total
Revenue
    % of
Total
NOI
 

San Diego

     13         4,056         21     21     13         4,056         19     20

Inland Empire

     5         1,173         5     5     5         1,173         5     5

Orange County

     11         3,349         17     17     12         3,789         17     17

Los Angeles

     13         3,047         17     17     14         3,267         17     17

San Francisco

     12         3,495         21     22     15         4,197         24     25
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

California

     54         15,120         81     82     59         16,482         82     84

Seattle

     13         3,456         15     14     13         3,456         14     13

Phoenix

     2         902         3     2     2         902         3     2

Sacramento

     1         400         1     2     1         400         1     1
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-Core

     3         1,302         4     4     3         1,302         4     3
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
     70         19,878         100     100     75         21,240         100     100
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) 

We define “same-store” communities as communities that have been completed, stabilized and owned by us for at least two twelve month periods. The term stabilized refers to communities that have reached a physical occupancy of at least 93%.

(2) 

Includes communities acquired, in lease-up phase or being rehabilitated that have been stabilized for less than two twelve month periods.

 

17


Table of Contents

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, same-store communities totaled 19,878 homes. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, our non same-store pool is comprised of 270 homes in lease up, 440 homes moved from same-store into rehabilitation and 652 acquired homes.

At June 30, 2012, our portfolio had real estate assets with a net book value of approximately $3.4 billion that included 75 apartment communities, aggregating 21,240 homes; 11 multifamily communities owned in joint ventures, comprised of 3,592 apartment homes; and eight (five in Northern California, two in Southern California, one in Seattle, Washington) apartment communities in various stages of construction and development, totaling 2,525 homes. We earn revenue and generate cash primarily by collecting monthly rent from our community residents.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

Rental and ancillary income

A summary of the components of revenues for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

     Three months ended
June 30, 2012
    Three months ended
June 30, 2011
              
     Revenues      % of Total
Revenues
    Revenues      % of Total
Revenues
    $ change
from
2011 to 2012
     % change
from
2011 to 2012
 

Rental income

   $ 94,299         96.1   $ 87,913         96.2   $ 6,386         7.3

Ancillary income

     3,824         3.9     3,456         3.8     368         10.6
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenues

   $ 98,123         100.0   $ 91,369         100.0   $ 6,754         7.4

The total increase in revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared with the three months ended June 30, 2011, was generated from an increase in same-store and non same-store revenue as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

     2012
Change
     % Change
from 2011
to 2012
 

Same-store communities

   $ 4,396         5.1

Non same-store communities

     2,358         46.5
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total increase in rental and ancillary revenues (excluding revenues from discontinued operations)

   $ 6,754         7.4
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The increase in same-store revenue was primarily due to a 5.4% increase in average monthly revenue earned per home in the same-store portfolio from $1,517 per home in the second quarter of 2011 to $1,599 per home in the second quarter of 2012. Average monthly revenue is comprised of rental and ancillary income earned on occupied homes during the period and concessions of $4 on revenues per occupied home during the period. Financial occupancy levels averaged 95.1% during second quarter 2012 down from 95.4% during second quarter 2011. The 46.5% increase in revenue from non same-store communities represents the increase in the year-over-year size of the portfolio from recently completed development communities and communities acquired in 2011.

Real estate expenses

A summary of the categories of real estate expenses for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

     Three months ended
June 30, 2012
    Three months ended
June 30, 2011
              
     Expenses      % of Total
Expenses
    Expenses      % of Total
Expenses
    $ change
from
2011 to 2012
     % change
from
2011 to 2012
 

Same-store

   $ 28,391         92.0   $ 27,283         93.3   $ 1,108         4.1

Non same-store

     2,484         8.0     1,949         6.7     535         27.4
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total real estate expenses

   $ 30,875         100.0   $ 29,232         100.0   $ 1,643         5.6

Same-store expenses increased approximately $1,108,000, or 4.1% from the quarter ended June 30, 2011, which is due to increases in administrative costs, payroll and lease commissions and property taxes. The increase is due to general operation activity in our same-store communities.

 

18


Table of Contents

Provision for depreciation

The provision for depreciation totaled $24,850,000 and $27,421,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease of $2,571,000 or 9.4% is primarily due to short lived assets that were depreciating during the six months ended June 30, 2011 but were fully depreciated prior to the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Interest expense

Interest expense was $16,272,000 (net of $5,369,000 of interest capitalized to the cost of apartment communities under development and construction) for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $2,467,000 or 13.2% from the same period in 2011. Interest expense was $18,739,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 (net of $3,554,000 of interest capitalized to the cost of apartment communities under development and construction). Interest expense decreased year over year due to increased development activity during 2012 resulting in higher amounts of capitalized interest as compared to the prior year coupled with lower average debt levels outstanding.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses totaled $6,211,000 and $5,159,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The general and administrative expenses increased $1,052,000, or 20.4%, primarily as a result of increased salaries and stock based compensation.

Other income

Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 totaled $706,000 and $597,000, respectively, and is comprised of the following:

 

     Three Months ended
June 30,
 
     2012      2011  

Management Fees

   $ 431,000       $ 456,000   

Interest Income

     90,000         94,000   

Other

     185,000         47,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 706,000       $ 597,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other Expenses

There were no other expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Other expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $111,000 and were comprised of costs related to the acquisitions of operating communities.

Discontinued operations

We classify the results of operations for communities sold during the period or designated as held for sale at the end of the period and deemed a component of an entity to be classified as discontinued operations. The community-specific components of net earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include all community-related revenues and operating expenses, depreciation expense recognized prior to the classification as held for sale and community-specific interest expense to the extent there is secured debt on the community. In addition, the net gain or loss on the eventual disposal of communities held for sale is reported as discontinued operations.

At June 30, 2012, we had no assets classified as held for sale.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we sold one community, Countryside Village, with 96 homes located in San Diego, CA. The approximate gross proceeds from the sale were $12,600,000, resulting in a net gain of $8,279,000.

During 2011, we sold two communities totaling 634 homes: Galleria at Towngate, with 268 homes located in Moreno Valley, California; and Windrush Village, with 366 homes located in Colton, California. The approximate gross proceeds from sale of the two communities were $65,175,000, resulting in a net gain of $14,489,000.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the net gain on sale and result of the one community sold was included in the discontinued operations line on the consolidated statement of income and totaled approximately $8,363,000. For the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the net income from the three communities sold were included in the discontinued operations line on the consolidated statement of income and totaled approximately $741,000.

 

19


Table of Contents

Dividends attributable to preferred stock

Dividends attributable to preferred stock for the second quarter of 2012 represent the dividends on our outstanding 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. All of our current outstanding shares of 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable preferred stock have a $25.00 per share liquidation preference. As of June 30, 2012, 2,159,715 shares of 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock remain outstanding. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we paid $911,000 in dividends on our 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

Dividends attributable to preferred stock for the second quarter of 2011 represent the dividends on our 6.75% Series C and 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we paid $2,653,000 in aggregate on our 6.75% Series C and 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

On August 15, 2011, we repurchased 840,285 shares of our 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a price of $24.33 per share on the open market, a $0.67 discount to par resulting in a non cash return from preferred shareholders of $563,000. In addition, the initial issuance costs associated with these shares totaling $718,000 were charged to retained earnings during the third quarter of 2011. The net effect of the activity was a $155,000 charge to retained earnings for the three months ending September 30, 2011.

On June 13, 2011, we redeemed all 4,000,000 shares of our 6.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.34688 per share. The redemption price was equal to the original issuance price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date. The initial issuance costs totaling approximately $3,616,000 associated with this series of perpetual preferred stock were charged to retained earnings during the second quarter of 2011.

Net income available to common shareholders

As a result of the various factors mentioned above, net income available to common shareholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, was $28,696,000, or $0.37 per diluted share, as compared with $6,172,000, or $0.09 per diluted share, for the same period in 2011.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

Rental and ancillary income

A summary of the components of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

     Six months ended
June 30, 2012
    Six months ended
June 30, 2011
              
     Revenues      % of Total
Revenues
    Revenues      % of Total
Revenues
    $ change
from
2011 to 2012
     % change
from
2011 to 2012
 

Rental income

   $ 187,201         96.1   $ 173,234         96.3   $ 13,967         8.1

Ancillary income

     7,542         3.9     6,624         3.7     918         13.9
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenues

   $ 194,743         100.0   $ 179,858         100.0   $ 14,885         8.3

The total increase in revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as compared with the six months ended June 30, 2011, was generated from an increase in same-store and non same-store revenue as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

     2012
Change
     % Change
from 2011
to 2012
 

Same-store communities

   $ 9,329         5.5

Non same-store communities

     5,556         61.7
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total increase in rental and ancillary revenues (excluding revenues from discontinued operations)

   $ 14,885         8.3
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The increase in same-store revenue was primarily due to a 5.4% increase in average monthly revenue earned per home in the same-store portfolio from $1,505 per home for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $1,587 per home for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Average monthly revenue is comprised of rental and ancillary income earned on occupied homes during the period and concessions of $4 on revenues per occupied home during the period. Financial occupancy levels averaged 95.2% during second quarter 2012 and 2011.The 61.7% increase in revenue from non same-store communities is due to the increase in the year-over-year size of the portfolio from recently completed development communities and communities acquired in 2011.

 

20


Table of Contents

Real estate expenses

A summary of the categories of real estate expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

     Six months ended
June 30, 2012
    Six months ended
June 30, 2011
              
     Expenses      % of Total
Expenses
    Expenses      % of Total
Expenses
    $ change
from

2011 to  2012
     % change
from

2011 to  2012
 

Same-store

   $ 56,484         91.5   $ 54,324         93.9   $ 2,160         4.0

Non same-store

     5,241         8.5     3,500         6.1     1,741         49.7
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total real estate expenses

   $ 61,725         100.0   $ 57,824         100.0   $ 3,901         6.7

Same-store expenses increased approximately $2,160,000, or 4.0% from the six months ended June 30, 2011, which is due to increases in administrative costs, payroll and lease commissions, and property taxes. The increase is due to general operation activity at our same-store communities. Non same-store expenses increased approximately $1,741,000, or 49.7% from the six months ended June 30, 2011, which represents the increase in the year-over-year size of the portfolio from recently completed development communities and communities acquired in 2011.

Provision for depreciation

The provision for depreciation totaled $49,825,000 and $51,311,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease of $1,486,000 or 2.9% is primarily due to short lived assets that were depreciating during the six months ended June 30, 2011 but were fully depreciated prior to the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Interest expense

Interest expense was $33,490,000 (net of $10,218,000 of interest capitalized to the cost of apartment communities under development and construction) for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $4,997,000 or 13.0% from the same period in 2011. Interest expense was $38,487,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (net of $6,286,000 of interest capitalized to the cost of apartment communities under development and construction). Interest expense decreased year over year due to increased development activity during 2012 resulting in higher amounts of capitalized interest as compared to the prior year and lower average debt levels outstanding.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses totaled $12,058,000 and $10,394,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The general and administrative expenses increased $1,664,000, or 16.0%, primarily as a result of increased salaries and stock based compensation.

Other income

Other income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 totaled $1,225,000 and $1,202,000, respectively, and is comprised of the following:

 

     Six Months ended
June 30,
 
     2012      2011  

Management Fees

   $ 851,000       $ 903,000   

Interest Income

     180,000         187,000   

Other

     194,000         112,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,225,000       $ 1,202,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

21


Table of Contents

Other Expenses

There were no other expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Other expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $254,000 and were comprised of costs related to the acquisitions of operating communities.

Discontinued operations

We classify the results of operations for communities sold during the period or designated as held for sale at the end of the period and deemed a component of an entity to be classified as discontinued operations. The community-specific components of net earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include all community-related revenues and operating expenses, depreciation expense recognized prior to the classification as held for sale and community-specific interest expense to the extent there is secured debt on the community. In addition, the net gain or loss on the eventual disposal of communities held for sale is reported as discontinued operations.

At June 30, 2012, we had no assets classified as held for sale.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we sold one community, Countryside Village, with 96 homes located in San Diego, CA. The approximate gross proceeds from the sale were $12,600,000, resulting in a net gain of $8,279,000.

During 2011, we sold two communities totaling 634 homes: Galleria at Towngate, with 268 homes located in Moreno Valley, California and Windrush Village, with 366 homes located in Colton, California. The approximate gross proceeds from sale of the two communities were $65,175,000, resulting in a net gain of $14,489,000.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the net gain on sale and result of the one community sold was included in the discontinued operations line on the consolidated statement of income and totaled approximately $8,510,000. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the net income from the three communities sold were included in the discontinued operations line on the consolidated statement of income and totaled approximately $1,547,000.

Dividends attributable to preferred stock

Dividends attributable to preferred stock for the first half of 2012 represent the dividends on our outstanding 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. All of our current outstanding shares of 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable preferred stock have a $25.00 per share liquidation preference. As of June 30, 2012, 2,159,715 shares of 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock remain outstanding. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we paid $1,822,000 in dividends on our 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

Dividends attributable to preferred stock for the first half of 2011 represent the dividends on our 6.75% Series C and 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we paid $5,606,000 in aggregate on our 6.75% Series C and 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

On August 15, 2011, we repurchased 840,285 shares of our 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a price of $24.33 per share on the open market, a $0.67 discount to par resulting in a non cash return from preferred shareholders of $563,000. In addition, the initial issuance costs associated with these shares totaling $718,000 were charged to retained earnings during the third quarter of 2011. The net effect of the activity was a $155,000 charge to retained earnings for the three months ending September 30, 2011.

On June 13, 2011, we redeemed all 4,000,000 shares of our 6.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.34688 per share. The redemption price was equal to the original issuance price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date. The initial issuance costs totaling approximately $3,616,000 associated with this series of perpetual preferred stock were charged to retained earnings during the second quarter of 2011.

Net income available to common shareholders

As a result of the various factors mentioned above, net income available to common shareholders for the six months ended June 30, 2012, was $46,804,000, or $0.61 per diluted share, as compared with $15,816,000, or $0.23 per diluted share, for the same period in 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resource

In the event that we do not have sufficient cash available to us from our operations to continue operating our business as usual, we may need to find alternative ways to increase our liquidity. Such alternatives may include, without limitation: (a) divesting ourselves of communities at less than optimal terms; (b) issuing and selling our debt and equity in public or private transactions under less than optimal conditions; (c) entering into leases with new tenants at lower rental rates or less than optimal terms; (d) entering into lease renewals with our existing tenants without an increase in rental rates at turnover; (e) reducing the level of dividends to common shareholders to the minimum level necessary to maintain our corporate REIT status under the Internal Revenue Code; or (f) paying a portion of our dividends in stock rather than cash. Taking such measures to increase liquidity may have a materially adverse effect on us and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders and pay amounts due on our debt.

 

22


Table of Contents

Our dividend per share amounts for the quarters ending June 30, 2012 and 2011 were $0.385 and $0.375, respectively. The quarterly common dividend payment of $0.385 is equivalent to $1.54 per common share on an annualized basis.

Depending upon the availability and cost of external capital, we anticipate making additional investments in multifamily apartment communities. These investments are expected to be funded through a variety of sources. These sources may include internally generated cash, temporary borrowings under our unsecured line of credit, proceeds from asset sales, public and private offerings of debt and equity securities, and in some cases the assumption of secured borrowings. To the extent that these additional investments are initially financed with temporary borrowings under our unsecured line of credit, we anticipate that permanent financing will be provided through a combination of public and private offerings of debt and equity securities, proceeds from asset sales and secured debt. However, permanent financing may not be available on favorable terms, or at all. We believe our liquidity and various sources of available capital are sufficient to fund operations, meet debt service and dividend requirements, and finance future investments. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, cash flows generated from operating activities were in excess of distributions to common shareholders, preferred shareholders and noncontrolling interest members by approximately $32,000,000. Due to the timing associated with operating cash flows, there may be certain periods where cash flows generated by operating activities are less than distributions. We believe our unsecured line of credit provides adequate liquidity to address temporary cash shortfalls. We expect that annual cash flows from operations will exceed annual distributions to equity holders for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is consistent with prior years. Annual cash flows from operating activities exceeded annual distributions to common shareholders, preferred shareholders and noncontrolling interest members by approximately $54,000,000 and $34,000,000 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 we invested $112,491,000 and $85,697,000 respectively in capital expenditures:

 

     Six months ended
June 30,
     Expected 2012 Annual
Range
 

(amounts in thousands)

   2012      2011      Low      High  

New development (including land)

   $ 91,776       $ 70,620       $ 190,000       $ 240,000   

Rehab expenditures

     12,682         5,131         30,000         55,000   

Capital expenditures

     8,033         9,946         21,000         23,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total capital expenditures

   $ 112,491       $ 85,697       $ 241,000       $ 318,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

We had a total of $690,018,000 carrying amount in unsecured senior notes at June 30, 2012, consisting of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

Maturity

   Unsecured Senior
Note Balance
     Interest  Rate
(Coupon)
 

February 2013

   $ 40,018         7.125

March 2014

     50,000         4.700

March 2017

     300,000         5.500

March 2021

     300,000         5.200
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total / Weighted Average Interest Rate(1)

   $ 690,018         5.510
  

 

 

    

 

(1) 

Represents the weighted average effective interest rate.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we exercised our right to redeem for cash all of the $35,000,000 outstanding convertible senior unsecured notes, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes outstanding, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, February 21, 2012.

On February 1, 2012, we prepaid a mortgage on a single community for $65,866,000 prior to its scheduled maturity, with no prepayment penalty.

In addition, at June 30, 2012, we had mortgage indebtedness with a total principal amount outstanding of $742,463,000, at an effective interest rate of 5.61%, and remaining terms ranging from one to eight years. For the periods ending June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively, unencumbered real estate net operating income represented, 72.9% and 68.6% of our total real estate net income.

As of June 30, 2012, we have 75 wholly or majority owned operating communities with a gross book value of approximately $3,609,000,000. Eighteen of the 75 operating communities with gross book values of approximately $926,187,000 are encumbered with secured financing totaling approximately $742,463,000. The remaining 57 operating communities are unencumbered with an approximate gross book value of $2,682,816,000. There are no unencumbered communities that are owned in subsidiaries that are guarantors under our unsecured line of credit.

Through December 31, 2011 we maintained an unsecured line of credit with a total commitment of $750,000,000. Based on our then current debt ratings, the line of credit accrued interest at LIBOR plus 47.5 basis points. In addition, we paid a 0.15% annual facility fee on the capacity of the facility. Borrowings under our unsecured line of credit totaled $129,000,000 at December 31, 2011. Borrowings under the unsecured line of credit were used to fund acquisition and development activities as well as for general corporate purposes. Balances on the unsecured line of credit were typically reduced with available cash balances. The facility was terminated subsequent to December 31, 2011.

 

23


Table of Contents

On January 5, 2012, we entered into a new $750,000,000 unsecured line of credit (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement has an initial term of 39 months, terminates on April 3, 2015 and replaces our previous $750,000,000 unsecured line of credit. Based on our current debt ratings, the line of credit accrues interest at LIBOR plus 120 basis points. In addition, we pay a 0.20% annual facility fee on the capacity of the line of credit. Borrowings under our unsecured line of credit totaled $251,000,000 at June 30, 2012. Borrowings under the unsecured line of credit were used to fund development activities as well as for general corporate purposes. Balances on the unsecured line of credit are typically reduced with available cash balances.

As of June 30, 2012, we had total outstanding debt balances of approximately $1,683,000,000 and total outstanding consolidated shareholders’ equity and redeemable noncontrolling interests of approximately $1,660,000,000 representing a debt to total book capitalization ratio of 50%.

We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges for equity securities in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

Our indebtedness contains financial covenants as to minimum net worth, interest coverage ratios, maximum secured debt, total debt to capital, and cash on hand among others. We were in compliance with all such financial covenants during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

We anticipate that we will continue to require outside sources of financing to meet our long-term liquidity needs beyond 2012, such as scheduled debt repayments, construction funding and potential community acquisitions. As of June 30, 2012 scheduled debt principle payments through December 31, 2012 totaled approximately $492,000.

On February 24, 2010, the Company entered into Equity Distribution Agreements (EDAs) with each of Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, UBS Securities LLC, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (collectively, the “sales agents”) under which the Company may issue and sell from time to time through or to its sales agents shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $250,000,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, 815,045 shares were issued under the EDAs, with an average share price of $49.09 for total gross proceeds of approximately $40,000,000 and total compensation paid to the sales agents of approximately $800,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, 545,348 shares were issued under the EDAs, with an average share price of $45.84 for total gross proceeds of approximately $25,000,000 and total compensation paid to the sales agents of approximately $500,000. During 2011, 1,291,537 shares were issued under the EDAs, with an average share price of $47.55 for total gross proceeds of approximately $61,414,000 and total compensation paid to the sales agents of approximately $1,228,280. As of June 30, 2012, the remaining capacity under the EDAs totals $123,600,000. The Company intends to use any net proceeds from the sale of its shares under the EDAs for general corporate purposes, which may include reducing borrowings under the Company’s unsecured line of credit, the repayment of other indebtedness, the redemption or other repurchase of outstanding debt or equity securities, funding for development activities and financing for acquisitions.

On May 11, 2011, we completed an equity offering of 9,200,000 shares of common stock, including shares issued to cover over-allotments, at $48.00 (prior to a $1.92 per share underwriters discount) per share. Total gross proceeds from this offering were approximately $441,508,000. We used the proceeds, net of the discount, of approximately $423,936,000 for general corporate purposes which included redeeming our 6.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and a portion of our 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, and to repay borrowings under our unsecured line of credit.

On August 15, 2011, we repurchased 840,285 shares of our 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a price of $24.33 per share on the open market, a $0.67 discount to par resulting in a non cash return from preferred shareholders of $563,000. In addition, the initial issuance costs associated with these shares totaling $718,000 were charged to retained earnings during the third quarter of 2011. The net effect of the activity was a $155,000 charge to retained earnings for the three months ending September 30, 2011. As of June 30, 2012, 2,159,715 shares of 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock were outstanding.

On June 13, 2011, we redeemed all 4,000,000 shares of our 6.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.34688 per share. The redemption price was equal to the original issuance price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date. The initial issuance costs totaling approximately $3,616,000 associated with this series of perpetual preferred stock were charged to retained earnings during the second quarter of 2011.

We continue to consider other sources of possible funding, including new joint ventures and additional secured construction and term debt. We own unencumbered real estate assets that could be sold, contributed to joint ventures or used as collateral for financing purposes (subject to certain lender restrictions). We also own encumbered assets with significant equity that could be further encumbered should other sources of capital not be available (subject to certain lender restrictions).

 

24


Table of Contents

Construction in progress and land under development

The following table provides data on our multifamily communities that are currently under various stages of development and construction. Completion of the development communities is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including construction delays and cost overruns. We cannot provide assurance that these communities will be completed, or that they will be completed by the estimated dates, or for the estimated amounts, or will contain the number of proposed homes shown in the table below. In addition to the communities below, we have predevelopment costs on land under contract for potential projects totaling approximately $19,300,000 recorded in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

(Dollar amounts in millions)

 

Community Name

   Location    Proposed
Number of
Homes
     Costs Incurred
to Date -
June 30, 2012 (1)
     Estimated
Total

Cost
     Estimated
Cost to
Complete
     Estimated
Completion
Date (2)
 

Construction in Progress

                 

Lawrence Station(3)

   Sunnyvale, CA      336       $ 89.4       $ 110.0       $ 20.6         1Q/2013   

Aviara (4)

   Mercer Island, WA      166         20.4         44.5         24.1         2Q/2013   

Solstice

   Sunnyvale, CA      280         55.4         121.9         66.5         1Q/2014   

Wilshire La Brea

   Los Angeles, CA      478         153.9         277.3         123.4         4Q/2014   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total Construction in Progress

        1,260       $ 319.1       $ 553.7       $ 234.6      

Community Name

   Location    Proposed
Number of
Homes
     Costs Incurred
to Date -

June 30, 2012
     Estimated
Total
Cost (5)
        

Land Owned (6)

              

Mission Bay (7)

   San Francisco, CA      360       $ 54.2         TBR      

Pleasanton

   Pleasanton, CA      254         19.5         TBR      

Pleasanton II(8)

   Pleasanton, CA      251         13.2         TBR      

Park Viridian II

   Anaheim, CA      400         37.4         TBR      
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total Land Owned

        1,265       $ 124.3       $ 513.2      
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

(1) 

Reflects all recorded costs as of June 30, 2012, recorded on our balance sheet as direct investments in real estate-construction in progress.

(2) 

“Completion” is defined as our estimate of when an entire project will have a final certificate of occupancy issued and be ready for occupancy.

(3) 

Reflects all recorded costs incurred as of June 30, 2012, recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Direct investments in real estate-Construction in progress.” Included in this amount is $8.9 million of costs for the completed units as of June 30, 2012 which, is reflected in our consolidated balance sheet as “Direct Investments in real estate - Investment in rental communities.”

(4)

During the fourth quarter of 2010, we entered into a ground lease for the Mercer Island site. The ground lease has an initial term of 60 years, two 15-year extensions followed by a 9-year extension. The annualized GAAP straight line lease expense is approximately $664,000.

(5)

Reflects the aggregate cost estimates; specific community cost estimates to be reported (TBR) once entitlement approvals are received and we are prepared to begin construction.

(6)

Land owned represents projects in various stages of entitlement, pre-development, development, and initial construction, for which construction or supply contracts have not yet been finalized. As these contracts are finalized, projects are transferred to construction in progress on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(7)

Represents two parcels of land in the Mission Bay district, acquired in the second quarter 2011 that are entitled for residential use and can be developed in phases.

(8)

During the second quarter of 2012, we closed on the Pleasanton II land parcel, and the land was transferred to land owned for development.

Dividends Paid to Common and Preferred Shareholders and Distributions to Noncontrolling Interest Members

A cash dividend has been paid to common shareholders each quarter since our inception in 1970. Our dividend per share amounts for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were $0.385 and $0.375 per share, respectively. Our dividend per share amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were $0.770 and $0.750, respectively. Total dividends paid to common shareholders for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were $59,294,0000 and $52,703,000, respectively.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we paid $1,822,000 in dividends on our 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we paid $5,606,000 in aggregate on our 6.75% Series C and 6.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

During the first quarter of 2012, all outstanding operating company units recorded in redeemable noncontrolling interests were converted to shares of common stock. As of June 30, 2012, no operating company units remain outstanding. Total distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interests were $0 and $461,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, $8,107,000 of other noncontrolling interests remained outstanding. Total distributions to other noncontrolling interests of our consolidated subsidiaries were $210,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

ITEM 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Information concerning market risk is incorporated herein by reference to Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. There has been no material change in the quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk since December 31, 2011.

 

25


Table of Contents

ITEM 4 – Controls and Procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that there are reasonable assurances that our controls and procedures will achieve the desired control objectives. Also, we have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. As we do not control these entities, our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to such entities are necessarily substantially more limited than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries.

As of June 30, 2012, the end of the quarter covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

26


Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.

The Company is involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business for which losses are expected to be covered under the Company’s insurance policies. As of June 30, 2012, the risk of material loss from such legal actions impacting the Company’s financial condition or results from operations has been assessed as remote.

 

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

    (a) Total
Number

of Shares
(or

Units)
Purchased  1
    (b) Average
Price  Paid per
Share (or Unit)
    (c) Total
Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Traded
Announced
Plans or
Programs
    (d) Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value)
of Shares  (or Units) that May
Yet Be Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs
 

April 1, 2012 through April 30, 2012

  $ —        $ —          —          —     

May 1, 2012 through May 31, 2012

    —          —          —          —     

June 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012

    13,560        48.41        —          —     

Total

  $ 13,560      $ 48.41        —          —     

 

1 

Includes an aggregate of 13,560 shares withheld to pay taxes

2 

Average price paid per share owned and forfeited by shareholder.

 

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None

 

ITEM 4. (Removed and Reserved).

 

ITEM 5. Other Information.

None

 

27


Table of Contents
ITEM 6. Exhibits.

 

  11    Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings.
  12    Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.
  31.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101    The following materials from the BRE Properties, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

28


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

      BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
      (Registrant)
Date: August 1, 2012      

/S/    JOHN A. SCHISSEL        

      John A. Schissel
      Executive Vice President,
      Chief Financial Officer

 

29


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

 

Exhibits.

     
  11    Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings.
  12    Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.
  31.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101    The following materials from the BRE Properties, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 31, 2012 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

30