Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - OFG BANCORP | g27127exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - OFG BANCORP | g27127exv31w2.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - OFG BANCORP | g27127exv32w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - OFG BANCORP | g27127exv31w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-12647
Oriental Financial Group Inc.
Incorporated in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, | IRS Employer Identification No. 66-0538893 |
Principal Executive Offices:
997 San Roberto Street
Oriental Center 10th Floor
Professional Offices Park
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00926
Telephone Number: (787) 771-6800
Oriental Center 10th Floor
Professional Offices Park
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00926
Telephone Number: (787) 771-6800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o | Accelerated Filer þ | Non-Accelerated Filer o | Smaller Reporting Company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock, as of the latest practicable
date:
45,274,338 common shares ($1.00 par value per share) outstanding as of April 30, 2011
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The information included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
forward-looking statements may relate to Oriental Financial Group Inc. (the Group) financial
condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business, including,
but not limited to, statements with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease
losses, delinquency trends, market risk and the impact of interest rate changes, capital markets
conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal proceedings and new accounting
standards on the Groups financial condition and results of operations. All statements contained
herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking, and the words anticipate,
believe, continues, expect, estimate, intend, project and similar expressions and
future or conditional verbs such as will, would, should, could, might, can, may, or
similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties,
estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict. Various factors, some of
which, by their nature are beyond the Groups control, could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that
might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to:
| the rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and economic conditions; | |
| changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes; | |
| the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies; | |
| changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels of capital; | |
| the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) on our businesses, business practices and cost of operations; | |
| the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of the real estate market in Puerto Rico; | |
| the performance of the stock and bond markets; | |
| competition in the financial services industry; | |
| additional Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) assessments; and | |
| possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes. |
Other possible events or factors that could cause results or performance to differ materially from
those expressed in these forward-looking statements include the following: negative economic
conditions that adversely affect the general economy, housing prices, the job market, consumer
confidence and spending habits which may affect, among other things, the level of non-performing
assets, charge-offs and provision expense; changes in interest rates and market liquidity which may
reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect the ability to originate and distribute
financial products in the primary and secondary markets; adverse movements and volatility in debt
and equity capital markets; changes in market rates and prices which may adversely impact the value
of financial assets and liabilities; liabilities resulting from litigation and regulatory
investigations; changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations; increased competition;
the Groups ability to grow its core businesses; decisions to downsize, sell or close units or
otherwise change the Groups business mix; and managements ability to identify and manage these
and other risks.
All forward-looking statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are based upon
information available to the Group as of the date of this report, and other than as required by
law, including the requirements of applicable securities laws, the Group assumes no obligation to
update or revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events
or circumstances after the date of such statements.
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
MARCH 31, 2011 AND DECEMBER 31, 2010
MARCH 31, 2011 AND DECEMBER 31, 2010
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 315,351 | $ | 337,218 | ||||
Money market investments |
2,060 | 111,728 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
317,411 | 448,946 | ||||||
Investments: |
||||||||
Trading securities, at fair value, with amortized cost of $1,447 (December 31, 2010 - $1,306) |
1,444 | 1,330 | ||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value, with amortized cost of $3,562,745
(December 31, 2010 - $3,661,146) |
3,587,930 | 3,700,064 | ||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost, with fair value of $855,816
(December 31, 2010 - $675,721) |
875,494 | 689,917 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost |
22,496 | 22,496 | ||||||
Other investments |
150 | 150 | ||||||
Total investments |
4,487,514 | 4,413,957 | ||||||
Loans: |
||||||||
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value |
34,216 | 33,979 | ||||||
Loans not covered under shared-loss agreements with the FDIC, net of allowance for loan
and lease losses of $32,727 (December 31, 2010 - $31,430) |
1,108,324 | 1,117,859 | ||||||
Loans covered under shared-loss agreements with the FDIC, net of allowance for loan
and lease losses of $53,480 (December 31, 2010 - $49,286) |
589,912 | 620,732 | ||||||
Total loans, net |
1,732,452 | 1,772,570 | ||||||
FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset |
436,889 | 471,872 | ||||||
Foreclosed real estate covered under shared-loss agreements with the FDIC |
17,302 | 15,962 | ||||||
Foreclosed
real estate not covered under shared-loss agreements with the FDIC |
12,793 | 11,969 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
28,634 | 28,716 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset, net |
30,404 | 30,350 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
23,353 | 23,941 | ||||||
Forward settlement swaps |
7,203 | 11,023 | ||||||
Investment in equity indexed options |
11,764 | 9,870 | ||||||
Investment in swap options |
7,804 | 7,422 | ||||||
Other assets |
62,606 | 64,422 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,176,129 | $ | 7,311,020 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Demand deposits |
$ | 947,526 | $ | 954,554 | ||||
Savings accounts |
240,863 | 235,690 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit |
1,313,083 | 1,398,644 | ||||||
Total deposits |
2,501,472 | 2,588,888 | ||||||
Borrowings: |
||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
32,335 | 42,470 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
3,456,605 | 3,456,781 | ||||||
Advances from FHLB |
281,687 | 281,753 | ||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
105,112 | 105,834 | ||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
36,083 | 36,083 | ||||||
Total borrowings |
3,911,822 | 3,922,921 | ||||||
FDIC net settlement payable |
1,774 | 23,082 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
47,933 | 43,798 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
6,463,001 | 6,578,689 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 1,340,000 shares of Series A and
1,380,000 shares of Series B issued and outstanding, $25 liquidation value. |
68,000 | 68,000 | ||||||
Common stock, $1 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 47,807,984 shares issued;
45,375,090 shares outstanding (December 31, 2010 - 47,807,734; 46,348,667) |
47,808 | 47,808 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,432,894 shares (December 31, 2010 - 1,459,067 shares) |
(28,746 | ) | (16,732 | ) | ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
498,303 | 498,435 | ||||||
Legal surplus |
46,717 | 46,331 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
50,727 | 51,502 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax of ($1,807) (December 31, 2010 - ($2,108)) |
30,319 | 36,987 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
713,128 | 732,331 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 7,176,129 | $ | 7,311,020 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
Quarter ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||
Loans |
||||||||
Loans not covered under shared-loss agreements with the FDIC |
$ | 17,841 | $ | 17,637 | ||||
Loans covered under shared-loss agreements with the FDIC |
14,226 | | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
43,738 | 43,594 | ||||||
Investment securities and other |
2,105 | 9,105 | ||||||
Total interest income |
77,910 | 70,336 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Deposits |
12,214 | 11,243 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
24,159 | 25,285 | ||||||
Advances from FHLB and other borrowings |
3,049 | 3,012 | ||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
1,021 | 1,021 | ||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
302 | 298 | ||||||
Total interest expense |
40,745 | 40,859 | ||||||
Net interest income |
37,165 | 29,477 | ||||||
Provision for non-covered loan and lease losses |
3,800 | 4,014 | ||||||
Provision for covered loan and lease losses, net |
549 | | ||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses |
32,816 | 25,463 | ||||||
Non-interest income: |
||||||||
Wealth management revenues |
4,682 | 3,978 | ||||||
Banking service revenues |
3,835 | 1,622 | ||||||
Mortgage banking activities |
1,959 | 1,797 | ||||||
Total banking and wealth management revenues |
10,476 | 7,397 | ||||||
Total loss on other-than-temporarily impaired securities |
| (39,590 | ) | |||||
Portion of loss on securities recognized in other comprehensive income |
| 38,958 | ||||||
Other-than-temporary impairments on securities |
| (632 | ) | |||||
Accretion of FDIC loss-share indemnification asset, net |
1,211 | | ||||||
Net gain (loss) on: |
||||||||
Sale of securities |
(2 | ) | 12,020 | |||||
Derivatives |
(3,968 | ) | (10,636 | ) | ||||
Trading securities |
(31 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Foreclosed real estate |
(132 | ) | (117 | ) | ||||
Other |
(27 | ) | 9 | |||||
Total non-interest income, net |
7,527 | 8,038 | ||||||
Non-interest expenses: |
||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
11,688 | 8,250 | ||||||
Professional and service fees |
5,451 | 2,153 | ||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
4,405 | 3,594 | ||||||
Insurance |
1,985 | 1,833 | ||||||
Electronic banking charges |
1,454 | 678 | ||||||
Taxes, other than payroll and income taxes |
1,380 | 857 | ||||||
Advertising and business promotion |
1,165 | 699 | ||||||
Loan servicing and clearing expenses |
1,021 | 724 | ||||||
Foreclosure and repossession expenses |
729 | 302 | ||||||
Communication |
397 | 342 | ||||||
Director and investors relations |
287 | 315 | ||||||
Printing, postage, stationery and supplies |
282 | 203 | ||||||
Other |
546 | 443 | ||||||
Total non-interest expenses |
30,790 | 20,393 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
9,553 | 13,108 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
6,472 | 1,172 | ||||||
Net income |
3,081 | 11,936 | ||||||
Less: Dividends on preferred stock |
(1,201 | ) | (1,201 | ) | ||||
Income available to common shareholders |
$ | 1,880 | $ | 10,735 | ||||
Income per common share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.42 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.41 | ||||
Average common shares outstanding and equivalents |
46,179 | 25,932 | ||||||
Cash dividends per share of common stock |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.04 | ||||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Preferred stock: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning and end of period |
$ | 68,000 | $ | 68,000 | ||||
Common stock: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
47,808 | 25,739 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock |
| 8,740 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
47,808 | 34,479 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
498,435 | 213,445 | ||||||
Issuance of
common stock |
| 90,896 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
368 | 263 | ||||||
Exercised restricted stock units with treasury shares |
(500 | ) | | |||||
Common stock
issuance cost |
| (5,062 | ) | |||||
Balance at end of period |
498,303 | 299,542 | ||||||
Legal surplus: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
46,331 | 45,279 | ||||||
Transfer from retained earnings |
386 | 1,201 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
46,717 | 46,480 | ||||||
Retained earnings: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
51,502 | 77,584 | ||||||
Net income |
3,081 | 11,936 | ||||||
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
(2,269 | ) | (1,322 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock |
(1,201 | ) | (1,201 | ) | ||||
Transfer to legal surplus |
(386 | ) | (1,201 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
50,727 | 85,796 | ||||||
Treasury stock: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
(16,732 | ) | (17,142 | ) | ||||
Stock purchased under the repurchase program |
(12,530 | ) | | |||||
Exercised restricted stock units with treasury shares |
500 | | ||||||
Stock used to match defined contribution plan |
16 | 15 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
(28,746 | ) | (17,127 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
36,987 | (82,739 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
(6,668 | ) | 29,743 | |||||
Balance at end of period |
30,319 | (52,996 | ) | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
$ | 713,128 | $ | 464,174 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,081 | $ | 11,936 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
(13,738 | ) | 44,610 | |||||
Realized (gain) loss on investment securities included in net income |
2 | (12,020 | ) | |||||
Total loss on other- than-temporarily impaired securities |
| 39,590 | ||||||
Portion of loss on securities recognized in other comprehensive income |
| (38,958 | ) | |||||
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges arising during the period |
7,123 | | ||||||
Income tax effect |
(55 | ) | (3,479 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period |
(6,668 | ) | 29,743 | |||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (3,587 | ) | $ | 41,679 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,081 | $ | 11,936 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||
Amortization of deferred loan origination fees, net of costs |
10 | 135 | ||||||
Amortization of premiums, net of accretion of discounts |
7,638 | 5,559 | ||||||
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
36 | | ||||||
Accretion of FDIC loss-share indemnification asset, net |
(1,211 | ) | | |||||
Other-than-temporary impairments on securities |
| 632 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
1,468 | 1,333 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
(109 | ) | (3,979 | ) | ||||
Provision for loan and lease losses, net |
4,349 | 4,014 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
368 | 263 | ||||||
Fair value adjustment of servicing asset |
(440 | ) | (449 | ) | ||||
(Gain) loss on: |
||||||||
Sale of securities |
2 | (12,020 | ) | |||||
Sale of mortgage loans held for sale |
(799 | ) | (862 | ) | ||||
Derivatives |
3,968 | 10,636 | ||||||
Sale of foreclosed real estate |
132 | 117 | ||||||
Sale of premises and equipment |
8 | (14 | ) | |||||
Originations and purchases of loans held-for-sale |
(52,807 | ) | (49,958 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
17,970 | 17,633 | ||||||
Net (increase) decrease in: |
||||||||
Trading securities |
(114 | ) | 230 | |||||
Accrued interest receivable |
112 | (3,444 | ) | |||||
Other assets |
2,374 | 419 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||
Accrued interest on deposits and borrowings |
(312 | ) | (563 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
(17,143 | ) | 4,476 | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(31,419 | ) | (13,906 | ) | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of: |
||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
(222,947 | ) | (2,104,008 | ) | ||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
(209,112 | ) | | |||||
Equity options |
(525 | ) | (524 | ) | ||||
Maturities and redemptions of: |
||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
303,270 | 915,890 | ||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
22,042 | | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of: |
||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
44,528 | 1,238,588 | ||||||
Foreclosed real estate |
2,397 | 2,228 | ||||||
Other repossessed assets |
589 | | ||||||
Premises and equipment |
(26 | ) | (75 | ) | ||||
Origination and purchase of loans, excluding loans held-for-sale |
(25,155 | ) | (28,153 | ) | ||||
Principal repayment of loans |
54,868 | 30,642 | ||||||
Shared-loss agreements reimbursements from the FDIC |
39,839 | | ||||||
Additions to premises and equipment |
(861 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
8,907 | 54,548 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||
Deposits |
(89,422 | ) | 69,377 | |||||
Short term borrowings |
(10,135 | ) | (11,226 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
| 94,574 | ||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(12,530 | ) | | |||||
Termination of derivative instruments |
6,534 | (236 | ) | |||||
Dividends paid on preferred stock |
(1,201 | ) | (1,201 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid on common stock |
(2,269 | ) | (972 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(109,023 | ) | 150,316 | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
(131,535 | ) | 190,958 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
448,946 | 277,123 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 317,411 | $ | 468,081 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
ORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosure and Schedule of Non-cash Activities: |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 41,057 | $ | 41,445 | ||||
Mortgage loans securitized into mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 32,599 | $ | 32,873 | ||||
Securities sold but not yet delivered |
$ | | $ | 116,747 | ||||
Securities purchased but not yet received |
$ | | $ | 171,813 | ||||
Transfer from loans to foreclosed real estate and other repossed assets |
$ | 4,693 | $ | 2,916 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accounting and reporting policies of Oriental Financial Group Inc. (the Group or Oriental)
conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and to banking industry
practices.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited statements are, in
the opinion of management, a fair statement of the results for the periods reported and include all
necessary adjustments, all of a normal recurring nature, for a fair statement of such results.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations.
Management believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading. The results of operations and cash flows for the periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. For further
information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year
ended December 31, 2010, included in the Groups 2010 annual report on Form 10-K.
Nature of Operations
The Group is a publicly-owned financial holding company incorporated under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. It has four direct subsidiaries, Oriental Bank and Trust (the Bank),
Oriental Financial Services Corp. (Oriental Financial Services), Oriental Insurance, Inc.
(Oriental Insurance) and Caribbean Pension Consultants, Inc., which is located in Boca Raton,
Florida. The Group also has a special purpose entity, Oriental Financial (PR) Statutory Trust II
(the Statutory Trust II). Through these subsidiaries and its divisions, the Group provides a wide
range of banking and wealth management services such as mortgage, commercial and consumer lending,
leasing, financial planning, insurance sales, money management, investment banking and brokerage
services, as well as corporate and individual trust services.
The main offices of the Group and its subsidiaries are located in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The Group
is subject to examination, regulation and periodic reporting under the U.S. Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956, as amended, which is administered by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System.
The Bank operates through 30 financial centers located throughout Puerto Rico and is subject to the
supervision, examination and regulation of the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions
of Puerto Rico (OCFI) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Bank offers
banking services such as commercial and consumer lending, leasing, savings and time deposit
products, financial planning, and corporate and individual trust services, and capitalizes on its
commercial banking network to provide mortgage lending products to its clients. Oriental
International Bank Inc. (OIB), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, operates as an
international banking entity (IBE) pursuant to the International Banking Center Regulatory Act of
Puerto Rico, as amended. OIB offers the Bank certain Puerto Rico tax advantages. OIB activities are
limited under Puerto Rico law to persons and assets/liabilities located outside of Puerto Rico.
Oriental Financial Services is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the SEC, and the OCFI. Oriental Insurance is
subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the Office of the Commissioner of
Insurance of Puerto Rico.
The Groups mortgage banking activities are conducted through a division of the Bank. The mortgage
banking activities consist of the origination and purchase of residential mortgage loans for the
Groups own portfolio and, if the conditions so warrant, the Group engages in the sale of such
loans to other financial institutions in the secondary market. The Group originates Federal Housing
Administration (FHA)-insured and Veterans Administration (VA)-guaranteed mortgages that are
primarily securitized for issuance of Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA)
mortgage-backed securities which can be resold to individual or institutional investors in the
secondary market. Conventional loans that meet the underwriting requirements for sale or exchange
under standard Federal National Mortgage Association (the FNMA) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (the FHLMC) programs are referred to as conforming mortgage loans and are also
securitized for issuance of FNMA or FHLMC mortgage-backed securities. The Group is an approved
seller of FNMA, as well as FHLMC, mortgage loans for issuance of FNMA and FHLMC mortgage-backed
securities. The Group is also an approved issuer of GNMA mortgage-backed securities. The Group is
the master
8
Table of Contents
servicer of the GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC pools that it issues and of its mortgage loan portfolio, but
entered into a subservicing arrangement with a third party.
Effective April 30, 2010, the Bank assumed all of the retail deposits and other liabilities and
acquired certain assets and substantially all of the operations of Eurobank from the FDIC as
receiver for Eurobank, pursuant to the terms of a purchase and assumption agreement entered into by
the Bank and the FDIC on April 30, 2010. This transaction is referred to as the FDIC-assisted
acquisition.
Significant Accounting Policies
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Group are prepared in accordance with GAAP
as prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
and with the general practices within the banking industry. In preparing the consolidated financial
statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Group believes that, of
its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and
complexity.
Loans and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the risks of the FDIC-assisted transaction
acquired loans are significantly different from those loans not covered under the FDIC loss sharing
agreements. Accordingly, the Group presents loans subject to the loss sharing agreements as
covered loans and loans that are not subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreements as non-covered
loans. Non-covered loans include any loans made outside of the FDIC shared-loss agreements before
or after the April 30, 2010 FDIC-assisted acquisition. Non-covered loans also include credit cards
balances acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition.
Non-Covered Loans
Non-covered loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or
until maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for
charge-offs, the allowance for non-covered loan and lease losses, unamortized discount related to
mortgage servicing right sold and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income
is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees and costs and premiums and
discounts on loans purchased are deferred and amortized over the estimated life of the loans as an
adjustment of their yield through interest income using the interest method. When a loan is paid
off or sold, any unamortized deferred fee (cost) is credited (charged) to income.
Credit cards balances acquired as part of the FDIC-assisted acquisition are to be accounted for
under the guidance of ASC 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually
required loan payments in excess of the Groups initial investment in the loans be accreted into
interest income on a level-yield basis over the life of the loan. Loans accounted for under ASC
310-20 are placed on non-accrual status when past due in accordance with the Groups non-accruing
policy and any accretion of discount is discontinued. These assets were written-down to their
estimated fair value on their acquisition date, incorporating an estimate of future expected cash
flows. To the extent actual or projected cash flows is less than originally estimated, additional
provisions for loan and lease losses will be recognized.
Interest recognition is discontinued when loans are 90 days or more in arrears on principal and/or
interest based on contractual terms, except for well collateralized residential mortgage loans in
process of collection for which recognition is discontinued when these become 365 days or more
past due based on contractual terms and are then written down, if necessary, based on the specific
evaluation of the collateral underlying the loan. Loans for which the recognition of interest
income has been discontinued are designated as non-accruing. Collections are accounted for on the
cash method thereafter, until qualifying to return to accrual status. Such loans are not
reinstated to accrual status until interest is received on a current basis and other factors
indicative of doubtful collection cease to exist.
The Group follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance
for loan and lease losses to provide for inherent losses in the non-covered loan portfolio. This
methodology includes the consideration of factors such as economic conditions, portfolio risk
characteristics, prior loss experience, and results of periodic credit reviews of individual
loans. The provision for loan and lease losses charged to current operations is based on such
methodology. Loan and lease losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the allowance for
loan and lease losses on non-covered loans.
9
Table of Contents
Larger commercial loans that exhibit potential or observed credit weaknesses are subject to
individual review and grading. Where appropriate, allowances are allocated to individual loans
based on managements estimate of the borrowers ability to repay the loan given the availability
of collateral, other sources of cash flow, and legal options available to the Group.
Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired. A loan is considered
impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Group will be
unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or as a practical
expedient, at the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral, if the
loan is collateral dependent. Loans are individually evaluated for impairment, except large groups
of small balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, and loans that
are recorded at fair value or at the lower of cost or fair value. The Group measures for
impairment all commercial loans over $250 thousand and over 90-days past-due. The portfolios of
mortgage, leases and consumer loans are considered homogeneous, and are evaluated collectively for
impairment.
The Group, using a rating system, applies an overall allowance percentage to each non-covered loan
portfolio segment based on historical credit losses adjusted for current conditions and trends.
The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss
history experienced by the Group over the most recent 12 months. This actual loss experience is
supplemented with other economic factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment.
These economic factors include consideration of the following: the credit grading assigned to
commercial loans, levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans; levels of and trends
in charge-offs and recoveries; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of any changes in risk
selection and underwriting standards; other changes in lending policies, procedures, and
practices; experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; local
economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; and effects of changes in credit
concentrations. The following portfolio segments have been identified: mortgage loans; commercial
loans; consumer loans; and leasing.
Mortgage
Loans: These loans were further segregated into four classes: traditional
mortgages, non-traditional mortgages, loans in loan modification programs and personal mortgage
collateral loans. Traditional mortgage loans include loans secured by dwelling, fixed coupons and
regular amortization schedules. Non-traditional mortgages include loans with interest-first
amortization schedules and loans with balloon considerations as part of their terms. Mortgages in
loan modification program are those loans that are being serviced under such program. The personal
mortgage collateral loans are mainly equity lines of credits. The allowance factor on these loans
is impacted by the historical loss factors on the sub-segments, the environmental risk factors
described above and by delinquency buckets.
Commercial loans: These loans consist mainly of commercial loans secured by existing
commercial real estate properties. The allowance factor assigned to these loans are impacted by
historical loss factors, by the environmental risk factors described above and by the credit risk
gradings assigned to the loans. These credit risk gradings are based on relevant information about
the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: economic conditions, portfolio risk
characteristics, prior loss experience, and results of periodic credit reviews of individual
loans.
Consumer loans: these consist of smaller retail loans such as retail credit cards,
overdrafts, unsecured personal lines of credit, and personal unsecured loans. The allowance factor
on these loans is impacted by the historical loss factors on the segment, the environmental risk
factors described above and by delinquency buckets.
Leasing: This segment consists of personal loans guaranteed by vehicles in the form of
lease financing or in the form of automobile and equipment loans. The allowance factor on these
loans is impacted by the historical losses on the segment, the environmental risk factors
described above and by delinquency buckets. This is a new business introduced in 2010, as such,
the historical loss factor have been matched to consumer loans due to the lack of historical
losses on leases.
Loan loss ratios and credit risk categories are updated at least quarterly and are applied in the
context of GAAP as prescribed by ASC and the importance of depository institutions having prudent,
conservative, but not excessive loan allowances that fall within an acceptable range of estimated
losses. While management uses current available information in estimating possible loan and lease
losses, factors beyond the Groups control, such as those affecting general economic conditions,
may require future changes to the allowance.
10
Table of Contents
Covered Loans
Covered loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition are accounted under the provisions of ASC
310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, which are
applicable when (a) the Group acquires loans deemed to be impaired when there is evidence of
credit deterioration and it is probable, at the date of acquisition, that the Group would be
unable to collect all contractually required payments and (b) as a general policy election for
non-impaired loans that the Group acquires.
The acquired covered loans were recorded at their estimated fair value at the time of acquisition.
Fair value of acquired loans is determined using a discounted cash flow model based on assumptions
about the amount and timing of principal and interest payments, estimated prepayments, estimated
default rates, estimated loss severity in the event of defaults, and current market rates.
Estimated credit losses are included in the determination of fair value; therefore, an allowance
for loan and lease losses is not recorded on the acquisition date.
In accordance with ASC 310-30 and in estimating the fair value of covered loans at the acquisition
date, the Group (a) calculated the contractual amount and timing of undiscounted principal and
interest payments (the undiscounted contractual cash flows) and (b) estimated the amount and
timing of undiscounted expected principal and interest payments (the undiscounted expected cash
flows). The difference between the undiscounted contractual cash flows and the undiscounted
expected cash flows is the non-accretable difference. The non-accretable difference represents an
estimate of the loss exposure in the covered loan portfolio, and such amount is subject to change
over time based on the performance of the covered loans. The carrying value of covered loans is
reduced by payments received and increased by the portion of the accretable yield recognized as
interest income.
The excess of undiscounted expected cash flows at acquisition over the initial fair value of
acquired loans is referred to as the accretable yield and is recorded as interest income over
the estimated life of the loans using the effective yield method if the timing and amount of the
future cash flows is reasonably estimable. Subsequent to acquisition, the Group aggregates loans
into pools of loans with common risk characteristics to account for the acquired loans. Increases
in expected cash flows over those originally estimated increase the accretable yield and are
recognized as interest income prospectively. Decreases in expected cash flows compared to those
originally estimated decrease the accretable yield and are recognized by recording a provision for
loan and lease losses and establishing an allowance for loan and lease losses.
Loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are generally considered accruing and performing loans as the
loans accrete interest income over the estimated life of the loan when cash flows are reasonably
estimable. Accordingly, acquired impaired loans that are contractually past due are still
considered to be accruing and performing loans. If the timing and amount of cash flows is not
reasonably estimable, the loans may be classified as nonaccrual loans and interest income may be
recognized on a cash basis or as a reduction of the principal amount outstanding.
Under the accounting guidance of ASC 310-30 for acquired loans, the allowance for loan and lease
losses on covered loans is measured at each financial reporting period, or measurement date, based
on expected cash flows. Accordingly, decreases in expected cash flows on the acquired covered
loans as of the measurement date compared to those initially estimated are recognized by recording
a provision for credit losses on covered loans. The portion of the loss on covered loans
reimbursable from the FDIC is recorded as an offset to the provision for credit losses and
increases the FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset.
Lease Financing
The Group leases vehicles and equipment for personal and commercial use to individual and
corporate customers. The direct finance lease method of accounting is used to recognize revenue on leasing
contracts that meet the criteria specified in the guidance for leases in ASC Topic 840. Aggregate
rentals due over the term of the leases less unearned income are
included in lease financing
contracts receivable. Unearned income is amortized using a method over the average life of the
leases as an adjustment to the interest yield.
Revenue for other leases is recognized as it becomes due under the terms of the relevant
contract.
Financial Instruments
Certain financial instruments, including derivatives, trading securities and investment securities
available-for-sale, are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains and losses are recorded in
other comprehensive income or as part of non-interest income, as appropriate. Fair values are based
on listed market prices, if available. If listed market prices are not available, fair value is
determined based on other relevant factors, including price quotations for similar instruments. The fair values of
certain derivative contracts are derived
11
Table of Contents
from pricing models that consider current market and contractual prices for the underlying financial instruments as well as time value and yield curve
or volatility factors underlying the positions.
The Group determines the fair value of its financial instruments based on the fair value
measurement framework, which establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1
measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three
levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 - Level 1 assets and liabilities include equity securities that are traded in an active
exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agency securities that
are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. Valuations are obtained from readily available
pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or
can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed securities for which the
fair value is estimated based on valuations obtained from third-party pricing services for
identical or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less
frequently than exchange-traded instruments and (iii) derivative contracts and financial
liabilities, whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in
the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include
financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, for which the determination
of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Impairment of Investment Securities
The Group conducts periodic reviews to identify and evaluate each investment in an unrealized loss
position for other-than-temporary impairments. The Group follows ASC 320-10-65-1, which changed the
accounting requirements for other-than-temporary impairments for debt securities, and in certain
circumstances, separates the amount of total impairment into credit and noncredit-related amounts.
The term other-than-temporary impairment is not intended to indicate that the decline is
permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value is not favorable, or
that there is a lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the
carrying value of the investment. Any portion of a decline in value associated with credit loss is
recognized in income with the remaining noncredit-related component being recognized in other
comprehensive income. A credit loss is determined by assessing whether the amortized cost basis of
the security will be recovered, by comparing the present value of cash flows expected to be
collected from the security, discounted at the rate equal to the yield used to accrete current and
prospective beneficial interest for the security. The shortfall of the present value of the cash
flows expected to be collected in relation to the amortized cost basis is considered to be the
credit loss.
The Groups review for impairment generally entails, but is not limited to:
| identification and evaluation of investments that have indications of possible other-than-temporary impairment; | ||
| analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has been in an unrealized loss position and the expected recovery period; | ||
| the financial condition of the issuer or issuers; | ||
| the creditworthiness of the obligor of the security; | ||
| actual collateral attributes; | ||
| any rating changes by a rating agency; | ||
| current analysts evaluations; | ||
| the payment structure of the debt security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments; |
12
Table of Contents
| current market conditions; | ||
| adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a geographic area; | ||
| the Groups intent to sell the debt security; | ||
| whether it is more-likely-than-not that the Group will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery; | ||
| and other qualitative factors that could support or not an other-than-temporary impairment. |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Group maintains an overall interest rate risk-management strategy that incorporates the use of
derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings that are caused
by interest rate volatility. The Groups goal is to manage interest rate sensitivity by modifying
the repricing or maturity characteristics of certain balance sheet assets and liabilities so that
the net-interest margin is not, on a material basis, adversely affected by movements in interest
rates. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged fixed-rate assets and liabilities will
appreciate or depreciate in market value. Also, for some fixed-rate
asset or liabilities. The effect of this
variability in earnings is expected to be substantially offset by the Groups gains and losses on
the derivative instruments that are linked to the forecasted cash flows of these hedged assets and
liabilities. The Group considers its strategic use of derivatives to be a prudent method of
managing interest-rate sensitivity, as it reduces the exposure of earnings and the market value of
its equity to undue risk posed by changes in interest rates. The effect of this unrealized appreciation or
depreciation is expected to be substantially offset by the Groups gains or losses on the
derivative instruments that are linked to these hedged assets and liabilities. Another result of
interest rate fluctuations is that the contractual interest income and interest expense of hedged
variable-rate assets and liabilities, respectively, will increase or decrease.
Derivative instruments that are used as part of the Groups interest rate risk-management strategy
include interest rate swaps, forward-settlement swaps, futures contracts, and option contracts that
have indices related to the pricing of specific balance sheet assets and liabilities. Interest rate
swaps generally involve the exchange of fixed and variable-rate interest payments between two
parties, based on a common notional principal amount and maturity date. Interest rate futures
generally involve exchange-traded contracts to buy or sell US Treasury bonds and notes in the
future at specified prices. Interest rate options represent contracts that allow the holder of the
option to (1) receive cash or (2) purchase, sell, or enter into a financial instrument at a
specified price within a specified period. Some purchased option contracts give the Group the right
to enter into interest rate swaps and cap and floor agreements with the writer of the option. In
addition, the Group enters into certain transactions that contain embedded derivatives. When the
embedded derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to
the economic characteristics of the host contract, it is bifurcated and carried at fair value.
The Group also offers its customers certificates of deposit with an option tied to the performance
of the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index. The Group purchases options from major financial
entities to manage its exposure to changes in this index. Under the terms of the option agreements,
the Group receives a certain percentage of the increase, if any, in the initial month-end value of
the index over the average of the monthly index observations in a five-year period in exchange for
a fixed premium. The changes in fair value of the option agreements used to manage the exposure in
the stock market in the certificates of deposit are recorded in earnings. The embedded option in
the certificates of deposit is bifurcated and the changes in the value of that option is also
recorded in earnings.
When using derivative instruments, the Group exposes itself to credit and market risk. If a
counterparty fails to fulfill its performance obligations under a derivative contract due to
insolvency or any other event of default, the Groups credit risk will equal the fair value gain in
a derivative plus any cash or securities that may have been delivered to the counterparty as part
of the transaction terms. Generally, when the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, this
indicates that the counterparty owes the Group, thus creating a repayment risk for the Group. This
risk is generally mitigated by requesting cash or securities from the counterparty to cover the
positive fair value. When the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, the Group owes the
counterparty and, therefore, assumes no credit risk other than the cash or value of the collateral
delivered as part of the transactions in as far as it exceeds the fair value of the derivative. The
Group minimizes the credit (or repayment) risk in derivative instruments by entering into
transactions with high-quality counterparties.
The Groups derivative activities are monitored by its Asset/Liability Management Committee which
is also responsible for approving hedging strategies that are developed through its analysis of
data derived from financial simulation models and other internal and industry sources. The
resulting hedging strategies are then incorporated into the Groups overall interest rate
risk-management and trading strategies.
The Group uses forward-settlement swaps to hedge the variability of future interest cash flows of
forecasted wholesale borrowings, attributable to changes in LIBOR. Once the forecasted wholesale
borrowings transactions occur, the interest rate swap will effectively lock-in the Groups interest rate payments on an amount of forecasted interest expense attributable
to the one-month LIBOR
13
Table of Contents
corresponding to the swap notional. By employing this strategy, the Group
minimizes its exposure to volatility in LIBOR.
As part of this new hedging strategy started this quarter, the Group formally documents all
relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management
objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking
all derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges to (1) specific assets and liabilities on
the balance sheet or (2) specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Group also
formally assesses (both at the hedges inception and on an ongoing basis) whether the derivatives
that are used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair
value or cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly
effective in future periods. The changes in fair value of the forward-settlement swaps are recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive income to the extent there no significant ineffectiveness.
The Group discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when (1) it determines that the derivative is
no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of a hedged item (including hedged
items such as firm commitments or forecasted transactions); (2) the derivative expires or is sold,
terminated, or exercised; (3) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur;
(4) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; or (5) management
determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate or
desired.
FDIC Shared-Loss Indemnification Asset
The FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset is accounted for as an indemnification asset measured
separately from the covered loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition as it is not
contractually embedded in any of the covered loans. The shared-loss indemnification asset related
to estimated future loan and lease losses is not transferable should the Group sell a loan prior to
foreclosure or maturity. The shared-loss indemnification asset was recorded at fair value at the
acquisition date and represents the present value of the estimated cash payments expected to be
received from the FDIC for future losses on covered assets, based on the credit adjustment
estimated for each covered asset and the loss sharing percentages. This asset is presented net of
any clawback liability due to the FDIC under the Purchase and Assumption Agreement. These cash
flows are then discounted at a market-based rate to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and
receipt of the loss sharing reimbursements from the FDIC. The amount ultimately collected for this
asset is dependent upon the performance of the underlying covered assets, the passage of time, and
claims submitted to the FDIC. The time value of money incorporated into the present value
computation is accreted into earnings over the shorter of the life of the shared-loss agreements or
the holding period of the covered assets.
The FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset is reduced as losses are recognized on covered loans and
loss sharing payments are received from the FDIC. Realized credit losses in excess of
acquisition-date estimates result in an increase in the FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset.
Conversely, if realized credit losses are less than acquisition-date estimates, the FDIC
shared-loss indemnification asset is amortized.
Core Deposit Intangible
Core deposit intangible (CDI) is a measure of the value of checking and savings deposits acquired
in a business combination. The fair value of the CDI stemming from any given business combination
is based on the present value of the expected cost savings attributable to the core deposit
funding, relative to an alternative source of funding. CDI is amortized straight-line over a
10-year period. The Group evaluates such identifiable intangibles for impairment when an indication
of impairment exists. No impairment charges were required to be recorded in the period ended March
31, 2011. If an impairment loss is determined to exist in the future, the loss would be reflected
as a non-interest expenses in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the period in
which such impairment is identified.
Foreclosed Real Estate and Other Repossessed Property
Non-covered Foreclosed Real Estate
Foreclosed real estate is initially recorded at the lower of the related loan balance or the fair
value less cost to sell of the real estate at the date of foreclosure. At the time properties are
acquired in full or partial satisfaction of loans, any excess of the loan balance over the
estimated fair value of the property is charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses on
non-covered loans. After foreclosure, these properties are carried at the lower of cost or fair
value less estimated cost to sell, based on recent appraised values or options to purchase the
foreclosed property. Any excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value, less
estimated costs to
14
Table of Contents
sell,
is charged to non-interest expenses. The costs and expenses associated to holding these
properties in portfolio are expensed as incurred.
Covered Foreclosed Real Estate and Other Repossessed Property
Covered foreclosed real estate and other repossessed property were initially recorded at their estimated fair value on the acquisition date, based on appraisal value less estimated selling costs. Any subsequent write-downs due to declines in fair value are charged to non-interest expense with a partially offsetting non-interest income for the loss reimbursement under the FDIC shared-loss agreement. Any recoveries of previous write downs are credited to non-interest expenses with a corresponding charge to non-interest income for the portion of the recovery that is due to the FDIC. |
Income Taxes
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Group is required to estimate income taxes.
This involves an estimate of current income tax expense together with an assessment of temporary
differences resulting from differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The determination of
current income tax expense involves estimates and assumptions that require the Group to assume
certain positions based on its interpretation of current tax laws and regulations. Changes in
assumptions affecting estimates may be required in the future and estimated tax assets or
liabilities may need to be increased or decreased accordingly. The accrual for tax contingencies is
adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case law
and emerging legislation. When particular matters arise, a number of years may elapse before such
matters are audited and finally resolved. Favorable resolution of such matters could be recognized
as a reduction to the Groups effective tax rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable settlement
of any particular issue could increase the effective tax rate and may require the use of cash in
the year of resolution.
The determination of deferred tax expense or benefit is based on changes in the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities that generate temporary differences. The carrying value of the Groups net
deferred tax assets assumes that the Group will be able to generate sufficient future taxable
income based on estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and related assumptions change in the
future, the Group may be required to record valuation allowances against its deferred tax assets
resulting in additional income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets on a regular basis and assesses
the need for a valuation allowance. A valuation allowance is established when management believes
that it is more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Changes in valuation allowance from period to period are included in the Groups tax provision in
the period of change.
In addition to valuation allowances, the Group establishes accruals for uncertain tax positions
when, despite the belief that the Groups tax return positions are fully supported, the Group
believes that certain positions are likely to be challenged. The uncertain tax positions accruals
are adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case
law, and emerging legislation. The Groups uncertain tax positions accruals are reflected as income
tax payable as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities. These accruals are reduced
upon expiration of statute of limitations.
The Group follows a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The
first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of
available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on
audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation process, if any. The second step is to
measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon
ultimate settlement.
The Groups policy is to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits
within the provision for income taxes on the consolidated statements of operations.
On January 31, 2011, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law the Internal Revenue Code for a
New Puerto Rico, which was subsequently amended (the 2011 Code). As such, the Puerto Rico
Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended, (the 1994 Code)
would be gradually repealed by the 2011 Code
as its provisions started to take effect, with some exceptions, as of
January 1, 2011. For corporate
taxpayers, the 2011 Code retains the 20% regular income tax rate but establishes significant lower
surtax rates. The 2011 Code provides a surtax rate from 5% to 10% for years starting after December
31, 2010, but before January 1, 2014. That surtax rate may be reduced to 5% after December 31,
2013, if certain economic
and budgetary control
tests are met by the Government of Puerto Rico. If such economic tests
are not met, the reduction of the surtax rate will start when such economic tests are met. In the
case of a controlled group of corporations the determination of
15
Table of Contents
which surtax rate applies will be made by adding the net taxable income of each of
the entities members of the controlled group reduced by the surtax deduction. The 2011 Code also
provides a surtax deduction of $750,000. In the case of controlled group of corporations, the
surtax deduction should be distributed among the members of the controlled group. The alternative
minimum tax is 20%. The 2011 Code eliminates the 5% additional surtax which was established by Act
No. 7 of March 9, 2009, and the 5% recapture of the benefit of the income tax tables.
Equity-Based Compensation Plan
The Groups Amended and Restated 2007 Omnibus Performance Incentive Plan (the Omnibus Plan)
provides for equity-based compensation incentives through the grant of stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted units and dividend equivalents, as well as
equity-based performance awards. The Omnibus Plan was adopted in 2007, amended and restated in
2008, and further amended in 2010.
The purpose of the Omnibus Plan is to provide flexibility to the Group to attract, retain and
motivate directors, officers, and key employees through the grant of awards based on performance
and to adjust its compensation practices to the best compensation practice and corporate governance
trends as they develop from time to time. The Omnibus Plan is further intended to motivate high
levels of individual performance coupled with increased shareholder returns. Therefore, awards
under the Omnibus Plan (each, an Award) are intended to be based upon the recipients individual
performance, level of responsibility and potential to make significant contributions to the Group.
Generally, the Omnibus Plan will terminate as of (a) the date when no more of the Groups shares of
common stock are available for issuance under the Omnibus Plan, or, if earlier, (b) the date the
Omnibus Plan is terminated by the Groups Board of Directors.
The Boards Compensation Committee (the Committee), or such other committee as the Board may
designate, has full authority to interpret and administer the Omnibus Plan in order to carry out
its provisions and purposes. The Committee has the authority to determine those persons eligible to
receive an Award and to establish the terms and conditions of any Award. The Committee may
delegate, subject to such terms or conditions or guidelines as it shall determine, to any employee
or group of employees any portion of its authority and powers under the Omnibus Plan with respect
to participants who are not directors or executive officers subject to the reporting requirements
under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Only
the Committee may exercise authority in respect of Awards granted to such participants.
The Omnibus Plan replaced and superseded the Groups 1996, 1998 and 2000 Incentive Stock Option
Plans (the Stock Option Plans). All outstanding stock options under the Stock Option Plans
continue in full force and effect, subject to their original terms and conditions.
The expected term of stock options granted represents the period of time that such options are
expected to be outstanding. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Groups
shares of common stock over the most recent period equal to the expected term of the stock options.
The Group follows the fair value method of recording stock-based compensation. The Group uses the
modified prospective transition method, which requires measurement of the cost of employee services
received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the
award with the cost to be recognized over the service period. It applies to all awards unvested and
granted after this effective date and awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after that date.
Subsequent Events
The Group has evaluated other events subsequent to the balance sheet date and prior to the filing
of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and has adjusted and
disclosed those events that have occurred that would require adjustment or disclosure in the
consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
When necessary, certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the
current year presentation.
16
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Developments:
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (FASB ASC Topic 820) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements, issued in January 2010, requires new disclosures and clarifies some existing
disclosure requirements about fair value measurements as set forth in FASB ASC Subtopic 820-10.
This update amends Subtopic 820-10 and now requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the
amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and
describe the reasons for the transfer. Also in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information
about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. In addition, this update clarifies existing
disclosures as follows: (i) for purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of
assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate
classes of assets and liabilities, and (ii) a reporting entity should provide disclosures about the
valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair
value measurements. This update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the roll-forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures
are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within
those fiscal years. This
Level 3 disclosure
guidance was adopted on the Groups unaudited consolidated financial
statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Credit Quality and Allowance for Credit Losses Disclosures In July 2010, FASB issued ASU No.
2010-20, Disclosures about Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses.
The ASU requires a greater level of disaggregated information about the allowance for credit losses
and the credit quality of financing receivables. The period-end balance disclosure requirements for
loans and the allowance for loan and lease losses is effective for reporting periods ending on or
after December 15, 2010, while disclosures for activity during a reporting period that occurs in
the loan and allowance for loan and lease losses accounts will be effective for reporting periods
beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Group adopted this guidance for period-end balance
disclosures for loans and the allowance for loan and lease losses. Refer to Note 5 to the unaudited
consolidated financial statements for additional information. In January 2011, FASB issued ASU No.
2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update
No. 2010-20, which temporarily delays the effective date of the disclosures regarding troubled debt
restructurings in ASU No. 2010-20 for public entities. The anticipated effective date is for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011.
Troubled Debt Restructuring In January 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-01, Deferral of the
Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20, which
temporarily delays the effective date of the disclosures regarding troubled debt restructurings in
ASU No. 2010-20 for public entities. In April 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, A Creditors
Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. ASU No. 2011-02 requires
that when evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, a creditor
must separately conclude that both of the following exist: a) the restructuring constitutes a
concession; b) The debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. Also, the ASU sets the effective
date when an entity should disclose the information deferred by ASU No. 2011-01, for interim and
annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Group is
in the process of evaluating the effect this accounting guidance may
have on the Groups unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
Other accounting standards that have been issued by FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not
expected to have a material impact on the Groups financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
NOTE 2 FDIC-ASSISTED ACQUISITION AND FDIC SHARED-LOSS INDEMNIFICATION ASSET
On April 30, 2010 the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed certain deposits and other
liabilities of Eurobank from the FDIC as receiver of Eurobank, San Juan, Puerto Rico. As part of
the Purchase and Assumption Agreement between the Bank and the FDIC (the Purchase and Assumption
Agreement), the Bank and the FDIC entered into shared-loss agreements (each, a shared-loss
agreement and collectively, the shared-loss agreements), whereby the FDIC will cover a
substantial portion of any future losses on loans (and related unfunded loan commitments),
foreclosed real estate and other repossessed properties.
The acquired loans, foreclosed real estate, and other repossessed property subject to the
shared-loss agreements are collectively referred as covered assets. Under the terms of the
shared-loss agreements, the FDIC absorbs 80% of losses and shares in 80% of loss recoveries on
covered assets. The term for loss share on single family residential mortgage loans is ten years
with respect to losses and loss recoveries, while the term for loss share on commercial loans is
five years with respect to losses and eight years with respect to loss recoveries, from the April
30, 2010 acquisition date. The shared-loss agreements also provide for certain costs directly
related to the collection and preservation of covered assets to be reimbursed at an 80% level.
17
Table of Contents
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of April 30, 2010 were presented at their fair
value. In many cases, the determination of these fair values required management to make estimates
about discount rates, expected cash flows, market conditions and other future events that are
highly subjective in nature and subject to change. The fair values initially assigned to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed were preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year
after the closing date of the acquisition as new information relative to closing date fair values
became available.
The Bank and the FDIC have been engaged in ongoing discussions that impacted certain assets
acquired or certain liabilities assumed by the Bank. The Bank and the FDIC have had several
preliminary settlements since the FDIC-assisted acquisition that have been adjusted as
re-measurement figures of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on April 30, 2010. At March
31, 2011 there are $1.8 million in FDIC net settlement payable. On April 29, 2011, following the
anniversary of the FDIC-assisted acquisition, Oriental Bank and Trust and the FDIC reached a final
settlement as part of the Purchase and Assumption Agreement.
The Bank has agreed to make a true-up payment, also known as clawback liability, to the FDIC on the
date that is 45 days following the last day of the final shared loss month, or upon the final
disposition of all covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses thereunder
fail to reach expected levels. Under the loss sharing agreements, the Bank will pay to the FDIC 50%
of the excess, if any, of: (i) 20% of the Intrinsic Loss Estimate of $906.0 million (or $181.2
million) (as determined by the FDIC) less (ii) the sum of: (A) 25% of the asset discount (per bid)
(or ($227.5 million)); plus (B) 25% of the cumulative shared-loss payments (defined as the
aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to the Bank minus the aggregate of all of the
payments made or payable to the FDIC); plus (C) the sum of the period servicing amounts for every
consecutive twelve-month period prior to and ending on the True-Up Measurement Date in respect of
each of the loss sharing agreements during which the loss sharing provisions of the applicable loss
sharing agreement is in effect (defined as the product of the simple average of the principal
amount of shared loss loans and shared loss assets at the beginning and end of such period times
1%). The true-up payment represents an estimated liability of $13.8 million at April 30, 2010. This
estimated liability is accounted for as part of the indemnification asset. The indemnification
asset represents the portion of estimated losses covered by the loss sharing agreements between the
Bank and the FDIC.
The operating results of the Group for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 include the operating
results produced by the acquired assets and liabilities assumed. The Group believes that given the
nature of assets and liabilities assumed, the significant amount of fair value adjustments, the
nature of additional consideration provided to the FDIC (note payable and equity appreciation
instrument) and the FDIC loss sharing agreements now in place, historical results of Eurobank are
not meaningful to the Groups results, and thus no pro forma information is presented.
The FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset activity for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 is as
follows:
Quarter Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 471,872 | ||
Shared-loss agreements reimbursements from the FDIC |
(39,839 | ) | ||
Credit impairment losses to be covered under shared-loss agreements |
3,645 | |||
Accretion of FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset, net |
1,211 | |||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
$ | 436,889 | ||
18
Table of Contents
NOTE 3 INVESTMENTS
Money Market Investments
The Group considers as cash equivalents all money market instruments that are not pledged and that
have maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition. At March 31, 2011, and December
31, 2010, cash equivalents included as part of cash and due from
banks amounted to $2.1 million
and $111.7 million, respectively.
Investment Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value, and weighted average yield of
the securities owned by the Group at March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, were as follows:
March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Average | ||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Yield | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations
of Puerto Rico Government and political subdivisions |
$ | 81,152 | $ | 60 | $ | 3,954 | $ | 77,258 | 5.14 | % | ||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,725 | | 16,563 | 45,162 | 3.69 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
142,877 | 60 | 20,517 | 122,420 | ||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
3,156,825 | 33,471 | 3,004 | 3,187,292 | 3.78 | % | ||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
108,905 | 8,805 | | 117,710 | 5.23 | % | ||||||||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
154,138 | 6,400 | 30 | 160,508 | 4.98 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
3,419,868 | 48,676 | 3,034 | 3,465,510 | ||||||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
3,562,745 | 48,736 | 23,551 | 3,587,930 | 3.91 | % | ||||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
||||||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
875,494 | | 19,678 | 855,816 | 3.77 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,438,239 | $ | 48,736 | $ | 43,229 | $ | 4,443,746 | 3.88 | % | ||||||||||
19
Table of Contents
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Average | ||||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Yield | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations
of Puerto Rico Government and political subdivisions |
$ | 71,128 | $ | 160 | $ | 3,625 | $ | 67,663 | 5.37 | % | ||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,724 | | 20,031 | 41,693 | 3.68 | % | ||||||||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
3,000 | | | 3,000 | 0.01 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
135,852 | 160 | 23,656 | 112,356 | ||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
3,238,802 | 45,446 | 2,058 | 3,282,190 | 3.70 | % | ||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
118,191 | 9,523 | | 127,714 | 5.19 | % | ||||||||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
168,301 | 9,524 | 21 | 177,804 | 5.01 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
3,525,294 | 64,493 | 2,079 | 3,587,708 | ||||||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale |
3,661,146 | 64,653 | 25,735 | 3,700,064 | 3.84 | % | ||||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
||||||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
689,917 | | 14,196 | 675,721 | 3.74 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,351,063 | $ | 64,653 | $ | 39,931 | $ | 4,375,785 | 3.82 | % | ||||||||||
The amortized cost and fair value of the Groups investment securities at March 31, 2011, by
contractual maturity, are shown in the next table. Securities not due on a single contractual
maturity date, such as collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final
contractual maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers
may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
20
Table of Contents
March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale | Held-to-maturity | |||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||
Due from 1 to 5 years |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations
of Puerto Rico Government and political subdivisions |
$ | 10,386 | $ | 10,341 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Total due from 1 to 5 years |
10,386 | 10,341 | | | ||||||||||||
Due after 5 to 10 years |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations
of Puerto Rico Government and political subdivisions |
13,702 | 12,814 | | | ||||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
11,977 | 9,427 | | | ||||||||||||
Total due after 5 to 10 years |
25,679 | 22,241 | | | ||||||||||||
Due after 10 years |
||||||||||||||||
Obligations
of Puerto Rico Government and political subdivisions |
57,064 | 54,103 | | | ||||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
49,748 | 35,735 | | | ||||||||||||
Total due after 10 years |
106,812 | 89,838 | | | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
142,877 | 122,420 | | | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
||||||||||||||||
Due after 5 to 10 years |
||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
12,779 | 13,526 | | | ||||||||||||
Due after 10 years |
||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
3,144,047 | 3,173,766 | 875,494 | 855,816 | ||||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
108,905 | 117,710 | | | ||||||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
154,137 | 160,508 | | | ||||||||||||
Total due after 10 years |
3,407,089 | 3,451,984 | 875,494 | 855,816 | ||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
3,419,868 | 3,465,510 | 875,494 | 855,816 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,562,745 | $ | 3,587,930 | $ | 875,494 | $ | 855,816 | ||||||||
Keeping with the Groups investment strategy, during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, there were certain sales of available-for sale securities because the Group felt at the time
of such sales that gains could be realized while at the same time having good opportunities to
invest the proceeds in other investment securities with attractive yields and terms that would
allow the Group to continue to protect its net interest margin. Also, the Group, as part of its
asset/liability management, purchases
US government sponsored
agencies
discount notes close to their maturities as a short
term vehicle to reinvest the proceeds of sale transactions until investment securities with
attractive yields can be purchased. During the quarters ended
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, the Group sold
approximately $10.6 million and $267.0 million,
respectively, of discount notes with minimal aggregate gross gains
and losses, which amounted to less than $1 thousand.
21
Table of Contents
The tables below present an analysis of the gross realized gains and losses by category for the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Face Value | Cost | Sale Price | Sale Book Value | Gross Gains | Gross Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of Securities Available-for-Sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored agencies |
$ | 10,600 | $ | 10,599 | $ | 10,600 | $ | 10,600 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities |
10,600 | 10,599 | 10,600 | 10,600 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
1,056 | 1,073 | 1,073 | 1,073 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
32,599 | 32,795 | 32,855 | 32,857 | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
33,655 | 33,868 | 33,928 | 33,930 | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 44,255 | $ | 44,467 | $ | 44,528 | $ | 44,530 | $ | | $ | 2 | ||||||||||||
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Face Value | Cost | Sale Price | Sale Book Value | Gross Gains | Gross Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of Securities Available-for-Sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored agencies |
$ | 267,000 | $ | 265,990 | $ | 266,996 | $ | 266,996 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
902,967 | 750,615 | 687,211 | 675,191 | 12,020 | | ||||||||||||||||||
GNMA certificates |
32,873 | 32,927 | 32,912 | 32,912 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-agency collaterized mortgage
obligations |
626,619 | 623,695 | 368,216 | 368,216 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities |
1,562,459 | 1,407,237 | 1,088,339 | 1,076,319 | 12,020 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,829,459 | $ | 1,673,227 | $ | 1,355,335 | $ | 1,343,315 | $ | 12,020 | $ | | ||||||||||||
22
Table of Contents
The following table shows the Groups gross unrealized losses and fair value of investment
securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of
time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010:
March 31, 2011
Available-for-sale
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale
(In thousands)
Less than 12 months | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
$ | 291,849 | $ | 3,004 | $ | 288,845 | ||||||
Obligations
of Puerto Rico Government and political subdivisions |
19,974 | 119 | 19,855 | |||||||||
CMOs issued by U.S. Government sponsored agencies |
2,572 | 30 | 2,542 | |||||||||
314,395 | 3,153 | 311,242 | ||||||||||
12 months or more | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,725 | 16,563 | 45,162 | |||||||||
Obligations
of Puerto Rico Government and political subdivisions |
50,792 | 3,835 | 46,957 | |||||||||
112,517 | 20,398 | 92,119 | ||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
291,849 | 3,004 | 288,845 | |||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,725 | 16,563 | 45,162 | |||||||||
Obligations
of Puerto Rico Government and political subdivisions |
70,766 | 3,954 | 66,812 | |||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
2,572 | 30 | 2,542 | |||||||||
$ | 426,912 | $ | 23,551 | $ | 403,361 | |||||||
March 31, 2011
Held-to-maturity
(In thousands)
Held-to-maturity
(In thousands)
Less than 12 months | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
$ | 875,494 | $ | 19,678 | $ | 855,816 | ||||||
23
Table of Contents
December 31, 2010
Available-for-sale
(In thousands)
Available-for-sale
(In thousands)
Less than 12 months | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
$ | 245,533 | $ | 2,058 | $ | 243,475 | ||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
2,591 | 21 | 2,570 | |||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
1,000 | | 1,000 | |||||||||
249,124 | 2,079 | 247,045 | ||||||||||
12 months or more | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,724 | 20,031 | 41,693 | |||||||||
Obligations
of Puerto Rico Government and political subdivisions |
50,773 | 3,625 | 47,148 | |||||||||
112,497 | 23,656 | 88,841 | ||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
245,533 | 2,058 | 243,475 | |||||||||
Structured credit investments |
61,724 | 20,031 | 41,693 | |||||||||
Obligations
of Puerto Rico Government and political subdivisions |
50,773 | 3,625 | 47,148 | |||||||||
CMOs issued by US Government sponsored agencies |
2,591 | 21 | 2,570 | |||||||||
Obligations of US Government sponsored agencies |
1,000 | | 1,000 | |||||||||
$ | 361,621 | $ | 25,735 | $ | 335,886 | |||||||
December 31, 2010
Held-to-maturity
(In thousands)
Held-to-maturity
(In thousands)
Less than 12 months | ||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||
Cost | Loss | Value | ||||||||||
FNMA and FHLMC certificates |
$ | 689,917 | $ | 14,196 | $ | 675,721 | ||||||
The Group conducts quarterly reviews to identify and evaluate each investment in an unrealized
loss position for other-than-temporary impairments. On April 1, 2009, the Group adopted ASC
320-10-65-1, which changed the accounting requirements for other than temporary impairments for
debt securities, and in certain circumstances, separates the amount of total impairment into credit
and noncredit-related amounts.
ASC 320-10-65-1 requires the Group to consider various factors during its review, which include,
but are not limited to:
| identification and evaluation of investments that have indications of possible other-than-temporary impairment; | ||
| analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has been in an unrealized loss position and the expected recovery period; | ||
| the financial condition of the issuer or issuers; | ||
| the creditworthiness of the obligor of the security; | ||
| actual collateral attributes; | ||
| any rating changes by a rating agency; | ||
| current analysts evaluations; | ||
| the payment structure of the debt security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments; |
24
Table of Contents
| current market conditions; | ||
| adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a geographic area; | ||
| the Groups intent to sell the debt security; | ||
| whether it is more-likely-than-not that the Group will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery; | ||
| and other qualitative factors that could support or not an other-than-temporary impairment. |
Any portion of a decline in value associated with credit loss is recognized in income with the
remaining noncredit-related component being recognized in other comprehensive income. A credit loss
is determined by assessing whether the amortized cost basis of the security will be recovered, by
comparing the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security, discounted at
the rate equal to the yield used to accrete current and prospective beneficial interest for the
security. The shortfall of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected in relation
to the amortized cost basis is considered to be the credit loss.
Other-than-temporary impairment analysis is based on estimates that depend on market conditions and
are subject to further change over time. In addition, while the Group believes that the methodology
used to value these exposures is reasonable, the methodology is subject to continuing refinement,
including those made as a result of market developments. Consequently, it is reasonably possible
that changes in estimates or conditions could result in the need to recognize additional
other-than-temporary impairment charges in the future.
With regards to the structured credit investments with an unrealized loss position, the Group
performs a detailed analysis of other-than-temporary impairments, which is explained in the
following paragraphs. Other securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2011 are mainly
composed of securities issued or backed by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored
entities. These investments are primarily highly liquid securities that have a large and efficient
secondary market. Valuations are performed on a monthly basis. The Groups management believes that
the unrealized losses of such other securities at March 31, 2011, are temporary and are
substantially related to market interest rate fluctuations and not to deterioration in the
creditworthiness of the issuer or guarantor. At March 31, 2011, the Group does not have the intent
to sell these investments in unrealized loss position.
At March 31, 2011, the Groups portfolio of structured credit investments amounted to $61.7 million
(amortized cost) in the available-for-sale portfolio, with net unrealized losses of approximately
$16.6 million. The Groups structured credit investments portfolio consist of two types of
instruments: synthetic collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and collateralized loan obligations
(CLOs).
The CLOs are collateralized mostly by senior secured (via first liens) middle market commercial
and industrial loans, which are securitized in the form of obligations. The Group invested in three
of such instruments in 2007, and as of March 31, 2011, have an aggregate amortized cost of $36.2
million and unrealized losses of $7.4 million. These investments are all floating rate notes, which
reset quarterly based on the three-month LIBOR rate.
The determination of the credit loss assumption in the discounted cash flow analysis related to the
Groups structured credit investments is similar to the one used for the non-agency collateralized
mortgage obligations, the difference being that the underlying data for each type of security is
different, which affects the cash flow calculations. In the case of the CLOs, the determination of
the future cash flows is based on the following factors:
| Identification of the estimated fair value of the contractual coupon of the loans underlying the CLO. This information is obtained directly from the trustees reports for each CLO security. | ||
| Calculation of the yield-to-maturity for each loan in the CLO, and determination of the interest rate spread (yield less the risk-free rate). | ||
| Estimated default probabilities for each loan in the CLO. These are based on the credit ratings for each company in the structure, and this information also is obtained directly from the trustees reports for each CLO security. The default probabilities are adjusted based on the credit rating assuming the highest default probabilities for the loans of those entities with the lowest credit ratings. In addition to determining the current default probabilities, estimates are developed to calculate the cumulative default probabilities in successive years. To establish the reasonability of the default estimates, market-implied default rates are compared to historical credit ratings-based default rates. | ||
| Once the default probabilities are estimated, the average numbers of defaults is calculated for the loans underlying each CLO security. In those cases where defaults are deemed to occur, a recovery rate is applied to the cash flow determination at the time in which the default is expected to occur. The recovery rate is based on average historical information for similar securities, as well as the actual recovery rates for defaults that have occurred within the pool of loans underlying the securities owned by the Group. |
25
Table of Contents
| One hundred simulations are carried out and run through a cash flow engine for the underlying pool of loans in each CLO security. Each one of the simulations uses different default estimates and forward yield curve assumptions. |
The Group estimates that it will recover all interest and principal for the Groups specific
tranches of these securities. This assessment is based on the cash flow analysis mentioned above in
which the credit quality of the Groups positions was evaluated through a determination of the
expected losses on the underlying collateral. The model results show that the estimated future
collateral losses, if any, are lower than the Groups subordination levels for each one of these
securities. Therefore, these securities are deemed to have sufficient credit support to absorb the
estimated collateral losses.
The Group owns a corporate bond that partially holds a synthetic CDO with an amortized cost of
$25.5 million and unrealized losses of $9.2 million as of March 31, 2011. Due to the nature of this
corporate bond, the Groups analysis focuses primarily on the CDO. The basis for the determination
of other-than-temporary impairments on this security consists on a series of analyses that include:
the ongoing review of the level of subordination (attachment and detachment) that the structure
maintains at each quarter end to determine the level of protection that remains after events of
default may affect any of the entities in the CDOs reference portfolio; simulations performed on
such reference portfolio to determine the probability of default by any of the remaining entities;
the review of the credit default spreads for each entity in the reference portfolio to monitor
their specific performance; and the constant monitoring of the CDOs credit rating.
As a result of the aforementioned analysis, the Group estimates that it will recover all interest
and principal invested in the bond. This is based on the results of the analysis mentioned above
which show that the subordination level (attachment/detachment) available under the structure of
the CDO is sufficient to allow the Group to recover the value of its investment.
As a result of the aforementioned analyses, no other-than-temporary losses were recorded during the
quarter ended March 31, 2011.
NOTE 4 PLEDGED ASSETS
At March 31, 2011, residential mortgage loans amounting to $592.6 million were pledged to secure
advances and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). Investment securities with fair
values totaling $3.8 billion, $69.8 million and $45.1 million at March 31, 2011, were pledged to
secure securities sold under agreements to repurchase, Puerto Rico public fund deposits and
deposits of the Puerto Rico Cash & Money Market Fund, respectively. Also, at March 31, 2011,
investment securities with fair values totaling $1.0 million were pledged against interest rate
swaps contracts, while others with fair values of $123 thousand were pledged as a bond for Trust
operations to the OCFI. At December 31, 2010, residential mortgage loans amounting to $512.0
million were pledged to secure advances and borrowings from the FHLB. Investment securities with
fair values totaling $3.8 billion, $73.4 million, $19.1 million, and $47.5 million at December 31,
2010, were pledged to secure securities sold under agreements to repurchase, Puerto Rico public
fund deposits, Federal Reserve Bank of New York advances, and deposits of the Puerto Rico Cash &
Money Market Fund, respectively. Also, at December 31, 2010, investment securities with fair values
totaling $9.9 million were pledged against interest rate swaps contracts, while others with fair
values of $124 thousand were pledged as a bond for the Banks trust operations to the OCFI.
As of March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, investment securities available-for-sale not pledged
amounted to $529.5 million and $422.1 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2011, and December 31,
2010, mortgage loans not pledged amounted to $464.9 million and $394.4 million, respectively.
26
Table of Contents
NOTE 5 LOANS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
Loans Receivable Composition
The composition of the Groups loan portfolio at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was as
follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
March 31, 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Loans non-covered under shared-loss agreements with FDIC: |
||||||||
Loans secured by real estate: |
||||||||
Residential - 1 to 4 family |
$ | 837,645 | $ | 847,402 | ||||
Home equity loans, secured personal loans and others |
23,957 | 25,080 | ||||||
Commercial |
214,365 | 210,530 | ||||||
Deferred loan fees, net |
(4,029 | ) | (3,931 | ) | ||||
1,071,938 | 1,079,081 | |||||||
Other loans: |
||||||||
Commercial |
16,923 | 24,462 | ||||||
Personal consumer loans and credit lines |
38,788 | 35,912 | ||||||
Leasing |
13,763 | 10,257 | ||||||
Deferred loan fees, net |
(361 | ) | (423 | ) | ||||
69,113 | 70,208 | |||||||
Loans receivable |
1,141,051 | 1,149,289 | ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
(32,727 | ) | (31,430 | ) | ||||
Loans receivable, net |
1,108,324 | 1,117,859 | ||||||
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
34,216 | 33,979 | ||||||
Total loans non-covered under shared-loss agreements with FDIC, net |
1,142,540 | 1,151,838 | ||||||
Loans covered under shared-loss agreements with FDIC: |
||||||||
Loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties |
161,145 | 166,865 | ||||||
Construction and development secured by 1-4 family residential properties |
16,516 | 17,253 | ||||||
Commercial and other construction |
378,961 | 388,261 | ||||||
Leasing |
69,630 | 79,093 | ||||||
Consumer |
17,140 | 18,546 | ||||||
Total loans covered under shared-loss agreements with FDIC |
643,392 | 670,018 | ||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses on covered loans |
(53,480 | ) | (49,286 | ) | ||||
Total loans covered under shared-loss agreements with FDIC, net |
589,912 | 620,732 | ||||||
Total loans receivable, net |
$ | 1,732,452 | $ | 1,772,570 | ||||
27
Table of Contents
The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in gross loans as of March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 by class of loans:
Loans Past | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due Over 90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | Greater than | Total Past | Days and Still | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Past Due | Past Due | 90 Days | Due | Current | Total Loans | Accruing | ||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans not covered under shared-loss agreements with the
FDIC: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Traditional |
$ | 23,089 | $ | 9,760 | $ | 72,293 | $ | 105,142 | $ | 626,009 | $ | 731,151 | $ | 30,636 | ||||||||||||||
Non-traditional |
1,843 | 835 | 10,582 | 13,260 | 63,847 | 77,107 | 3,163 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loss mitigation program |
2,816 | 918 | 9,474 | 13,208 | 40,081 | 53,289 | 5,963 | |||||||||||||||||||||
27,748 | 11,513 | 92,349 | 131,610 | 729,937 | 861,547 | 39,762 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity loans, secured personal loans |
148 | | 333 | 481 | 995 | 1,476 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | 55 | 55 | | 55 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
27,896 | 11,513 | 92,737 | 132,146 | 730,932 | 863,078 | 39,762 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
1,742 | 1,557 | 22,685 | 25,984 | 205,304 | 231,288 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal consumer loans and credit lines secured |
74 | 13 | 45 | 132 | 5,733 | 5,865 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Personal consumer loans and credit lines
unsecured |
412 | 124 | 124 | 660 | 17,775 | 18,435 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Credit cards |
323 | 114 | 268 | 705 | 3,804 | 4,509 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Overdrafts |
| | 6 | 6 | 8,497 | 8,503 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
809 | 251 | 443 | 1,503 | 35,809 | 37,312 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Leasing |
| 207 | 395 | 602 | 13,161 | 13,763 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans not covered under shared-loss
agreements with the FDIC |
$ | 30,447 | $ | 13,528 | $ | 116,260 | $ | 160,235 | $ | 985,206 | $ | 1,145,441 | $ | 39,762 | ||||||||||||||
28
Table of Contents
Loans Past | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due Over 90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | Greater than | Total Past | Days and Still | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Past Due | Past Due | 90 Days | Due | Current | Total Loans | Accruing | ||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans not covered under shared-loss agreements with the
FDIC: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Traditional |
$ | 22,093 | $ | 9,414 | $ | 76,604 | $ | 108,111 | $ | 638,158 | $ | 746,269 | $ | 37,850 | ||||||||||||||
Non-traditional |
837 | 845 | 12,016 | 13,698 | 66,056 | 79,754 | 4,953 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loss mitigation program |
2,528 | 1,043 | 9,336 | 12,907 | 33,497 | 46,404 | 6,060 | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,458 | 11,302 | 97,956 | 134,716 | 737,711 | 872,427 | 48,863 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity loans, secured personal loans |
149 | | 340 | 489 | 961 | 1,450 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | 55 | 55 | | 55 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
25,607 | 11,302 | 98,351 | 135,260 | 738,672 | 873,932 | 48,863 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
1,123 | 9,367 | 13,390 | 23,880 | 210,396 | 234,276 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal consumer loans and credit lines secured |
23 | | | 23 | 4,853 | 4,876 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Personal consumer loans and credit lines
unsecured |
419 | 207 | 136 | 762 | 17,576 | 18,338 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Credit cards |
262 | 173 | 285 | 720 | 3,620 | 4,340 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Overdrafts |
| | | | 7,624 | 7,624 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
704 | 380 | 421 | 1,505 | 33,673 | 35,178 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Leasing |
| 79 | 35 | 114 | 10,143 | 10,257 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans not covered under shared-loss
agreements with the FDIC |
$ | 27,434 | $ | 21,128 | $ | 112,197 | $ | 160,759 | $ | 992,884 | $ | 1,153,643 | $ | 48,863 | ||||||||||||||
Non-covered Loans
The Groups credit activities are mainly with customers located in Puerto Rico. The Groups loan
transactions are encompassed within four main categories: mortgage, commercial, consumer and
leases. The latter business was added to the Groups credit activities as a result of the
FDIC-assisted acquisition.
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Group had $81.4 million and $73.4 million,
respectively, of non-accrual non-covered loans including credit cards accounted under ASC 310-20.
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, loans of which terms have been extended that are not
included in non-performing assets amounted to $30.0 million and $35.0 million, respectively. The
covered loans that may have been classified as non-performing loans by the acquired banks are no
longer classified as non-performing because these loans are accounted for on a pooled basis.
Managements judgment is required in classifying loans in pools subject to ASC Subtopic 310-30 as
performing loans, and is dependent on having a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount
of the pool cash flows to be collected, even if certain loans within the pool are contractually
past due.
29
Table of Contents
The following table presents the recorded investment in non-covered loans on non-accrual
status by class of loans as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Mortgage |
||||||||
Residential |
||||||||
Traditional |
$ | 41,656 | $ | 38,754 | ||||
Non-traditional |
7,419 | 7,063 | ||||||
Loss mitigation program |
3,511 | 3,276 | ||||||
52,586 | 49,093 | |||||||
Home equity loans, secured personal loans |
333 | 340 | ||||||
Other |
55 | 55 | ||||||
52,974 | 49,488 | |||||||
Commercial |
27,562 | 23,619 | ||||||
Consumer |
||||||||
Personal consumer loans and credit lines unsecured |
176 | 136 | ||||||
Credit cards |
268 | 285 | ||||||
444 | 421 | |||||||
Leasing |
395 | 35 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 81,375 | $ | 73,563 | ||||
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance
homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified
impaired loans.
Credit Quality Indicators
The Group categorizes non-covered loans into risk categories based on relevant information about
the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: economic conditions, portfolio risk
characteristics, prior loss experience, and results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans.
Larger commercial loans that exhibit potential or observed credit weaknesses are subject to
individual review and grading. Where appropriate, allowances are allocated to individual loans
based on managements estimate of the borrowers ability to repay the loan given the availability
of collateral, other sources of cash flow and legal options available to the Group.
Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired. A loan is considered
impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Group will be
unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or as a practical
expedient, at the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral, if the
loan is collateral dependent. Loans are individually evaluated for impairment, except large groups
of small balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, and loans that
are recorded at fair value or at the lower of cost or fair value. The Group measures for impairment
all commercial loans over $250 thousand and over 90-days past-due. The portfolios of loans secured
by real estate (except commercial), leases and consumer loans are considered homogeneous, and are
evaluated collectively for impairment.
30
Table of Contents
The Group uses the following definitions for risk ratings:
Special Mention: Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves
managements close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in
deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institutions credit position at
some future date.
Substandard: Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net
worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so
classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the
debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some
loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as
substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in
full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, questionable and
improbable.
ASC 310-10-35: Loans that are individually measured for impairment.
Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described
process are considered to be pass rated loans. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and
based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of gross non-covered loans subject
to risk rating, by class of loans, is as follows:
Balance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at | Delinquency | |||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | Pass | Special Mention | Substandard | Doubtful | ASC 310-10-35 | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 231,288 | $ | 181,278 | $ | 5,682 | $ | 16,516 | $ | 141 | $ | 27,671 | ||||||||||||
Balance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at | Delinquency | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | Pass | Special Mention | Substandard | Doubtful | ASC 310-10-35 | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 234,276 | $ | 188,281 | $ | 5,908 | $ | 14,046 | $ | 143 | $ | 25,898 | ||||||||||||
31
Table of Contents
For residential and consumer loan classes, the Group also evaluates credit quality based on
the delinquency status of the loan, which was previously presented. As of March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of gross
non-covered loans not subject to risk rating, by class of loans, is as follows:
Balance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at | Delinquency | |||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | 0-90 days | 91-120 days | 121-365 days | Over 365 days | ASC 310-10-35 | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Traditional |
$ | 731,151 | $ | 658,858 | $ | 4,880 | $ | 25,756 | $ | 41,657 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Non-traditional |
77,107 | 66,525 | 209 | 2,954 | 7,419 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss mitigation program |
53,289 | 16,041 | 88 | 1,101 | 2,852 | 33,207 | ||||||||||||||||||
861,547 | 741,424 | 5,177 | 29,811 | 51,928 | 33,207 | |||||||||||||||||||
Home equity loans, secured personal loans |
1,476 | 1,143 | | | 333 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
55 | | | | 55 | | ||||||||||||||||||
863,078 | 742,567 | 5,177 | 29,811 | 52,316 | 33,207 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
37,312 | 36,869 | 185 | 258 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Leasing |
13,763 | 13,368 | 200 | 195 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 914,153 | $ | 792,804 | $ | 5,562 | $ | 30,264 | $ | 52,316 | $ | 33,207 | ||||||||||||
Balance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at | Delinquency | |||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | 0-90 days | 91-120 days | 121-365 days | Over 365 days | ASC 310-10-35 | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Traditional |
$ | 746,269 | $ | 669,665 | $ | 5,560 | $ | 32,291 | $ | 38,753 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Non-traditional |
79,754 | 67,738 | 1,012 | 3,941 | 7,063 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss mitigation program |
46,404 | 7,738 | | 2,064 | 2,553 | 34,049 | ||||||||||||||||||
872,427 | 745,141 | 6,572 | 38,296 | 48,369 | 34,049 | |||||||||||||||||||
Home equity loans, secured personal loans |
1,450 | 1,110 | | | 340 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
55 | | | | 55 | | ||||||||||||||||||
873,932 | 746,251 | 6,572 | 38,296 | 48,764 | 34,049 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
35,178 | 33,817 | 1,129 | 232 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Leasing |
10,257 | 10,222 | 8 | 27 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 919,367 | $ | 790,290 | $ | 7,709 | $ | 38,555 | $ | 48,764 | $ | 34,049 | ||||||||||||
For covered loans, the Group also evaluates credit quality based on the delinquency status of
the loan, comparing information from acquisition date through March 31, 2011.
32
Table of Contents
The Group also evaluates covered loans using severity factors. From the acquisition date through
March 31, 2011, there have been no adverse changes from those
originally estimated that would cause changes to the initial loss severity factors estimated for these
loans. The majority
of covered loans are secured by existing commercial real estate
properties. There has been no recent adverse experiences, different to
the originally estimated, that would require a change in the
expectation on collateral values, and the corresponding assumptions.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Non-Covered Loans
The Group maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that management considers
adequate to provide for probable losses based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risks. The
Groups allowance for loan and lease losses policy provides for a detailed quarterly analysis of
probable losses. The analysis includes a review of historical loan loss experience, value of
underlying collateral, current economic conditions, financial condition of borrowers and other
pertinent factors. While management uses available information in estimating probable loan losses,
future additions to the allowance may be required based on factors beyond the Groups control.
The following table presents the changes and the balance in the allowance for loan and lease losses
and the recorded investment in gross loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as
of March 31, 2011:
Mortgage | Commercial | Consumer | Leasing | Unallocated | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses for non-covered loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 16,179 | $ | 11,153 | $ | 2,286 | $ | 860 | $ | 952 | $ | 31,430 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(1,821 | ) | (309 | ) | (448 | ) | (60 | ) | | (2,638 | ) | |||||||||||||
Recoveries |
45 | 37 | 53 | | | 135 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for non-covered loan and lease losses |
3,462 | 1,126 | (6 | ) | 158 | (940 | ) | 3,800 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 17,865 | $ | 12,007 | $ | 1,885 | $ | 958 | $ | 12 | $ | 32,727 | ||||||||||||
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 2,229 | $ | 1,164 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,393 | ||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
15,636 | 10,843 | 1,885 | 958 | 12 | 29,334 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total ending allowance balance |
$ | 17,865 | $ | 12,007 | $ | 1,885 | $ | 958 | $ | 12 | $ | 32,727 | ||||||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 33,207 | $ | 27,671 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 60,878 | ||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
828,395 | 203,617 | 38,788 | 13,763 | | 1,084,563 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total ending non-covered loans balance |
$ | 861,602 | $ | 231,288 | $ | 38,788 | $ | 13,763 | $ | | $ | 1,145,441 | ||||||||||||
33
Table of Contents
Mortgage | Commercial | Consumer | Leasing | Unallocated | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses for non-covered loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 15,044 | $ | 7,112 | $ | 864 | $ | | $ | 252 | $ | 23,272 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(1,096 | ) | (110 | ) | (186 | ) | | | (1,392 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Recoveries |
| 11 | 72 | | | 83 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for non-covered loan and lease losses |
3,841 | (701 | ) | (72 | ) | | 946 | 4,014 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 17,789 | $ | 6,312 | $ | 678 | $ | | $ | 1,198 | $ | 25,977 | ||||||||||||
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 706 | $ | 624 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,330 | ||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
17,083 | 5,688 | 678 | | 1,198 | 24,647 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total ending allowance balance |
$ | 17,789 | $ | 6,312 | $ | 678 | $ | | $ | 1,198 | $ | 25,977 | ||||||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 10,490 | $ | 16,594 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 27,084 | ||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
895,792 | 187,145 | 22,954 | | | 1,105,891 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total ending non-covered loans balance |
$ | 906,282 | $ | 203,739 | $ | 22,954 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,132,975 | ||||||||||||
The Group evaluates all loans, some individually and others as homogeneous groups, for
purposes of determining impairment. At March 31, 2011, the total investment in impaired commercial
loans was $27.7 million (December 31, 2010 $25.9 million). The impaired commercial loans were
measured based on the fair value of collateral. The valuation allowance for impaired commercial
loans amounted to approximately $1.2 million and $823 thousand at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. At March 31, 2011, the total investment in impaired mortgage loans was $33.2
million (December 31, 2010 $34.0 million). Impairment on mortgage loans assessed as troubled
debt restructuring was measured using the present value of cash flows. The valuation allowance for
impaired mortgage loans amounted to approximately $2.2 million and $2.3 million at March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively.
34
Table of Contents
The Groups recorded investment in commercial and mortgage loans that were individually evaluated
for impairment, excluding FDIC covered loans, and the related allowance for loan and lease losses
at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid | Recorded | Specific | Recorded | |||||||||||||||||
Principal | Investment | Allowance | Coverage | Investment | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans with specific allowance |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 18,025 | $ | 16,146 | $ | 1,164 | 7 | % | $ | 16,576 | ||||||||||
Residential loss mitigation program |
33,207 | 33,207 | 2,229 | 7 | % | 34,324 | ||||||||||||||
Impaired loans with no specific allowance |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
11,525 | 11,525 | | 0 | % | 10,541 | ||||||||||||||
Total investment in impaired loans |
$ | 62,757 | $ | 60,878 | $ | 3,393 | 6 | % | $ | 61,441 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid | Recorded | Specific | Recorded | |||||||||||||||||
Principal | Investment | Allowance | Coverage | Investment | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans with specific allowance |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 11,948 | $ | 10,070 | $ | 823 | 8 | % | $ | 10,622 | ||||||||||
Residential loss mitigation program |
34,049 | 34,049 | 2,250 | 7 | % | 16,977 | ||||||||||||||
Impaired loans with no specific allowance |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
15,828 | 15,828 | | 0 | % | 11,472 | ||||||||||||||
Total investment in impaired loans |
$ | 61,825 | $ | 59,947 | $ | 3,073 | 5 | % | $ | 39,071 | ||||||||||
The impaired commercial loans were measured based on the fair value of collateral. Impairment
on mortgage loans assessed as troubled debt restructuring was measured using the present value of
cash flows.
The following table presents the interest recognized in commercial and mortgage loans that were
individually evaluated for impairment, excluding FDIC covered loans for the quarters ended March
31, 2011 and 2010:
Interest Income Recognized | ||||||||
For the Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Impaired loans with specific allowance |
||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 144 | $ | 108 | ||||
Residential Loss mitigation program |
484 | 156 | ||||||
Impaired loans with no specific allowance |
||||||||
Commercial |
197 | 98 | ||||||
Total interest income from impaired loans |
$ | 825 | $ | 362 | ||||
35
Table of Contents
Covered Loans under ASC 310-30
The Groups acquired loans under the FDIC-assisted acquisition of Eurobank were initially recorded
at fair value and no separate valuation allowance was recorded at the date of acquisition. The
Group is required to review each loan at acquisition to determine if it should be accounted for
under ASC 310-30 and if so, determines whether each loan is to be accounted for individually or
whether loans will be aggregated into pools of loans based on common risk characteristics. The
Group has performed its analysis of the loans to be accounted for as impaired under ASC 310-30
(Impaired Loans in the tables below). For the loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted acquisition
that are not within the scope of ASC 310-30 (Non-Impaired Loans in the tables below), the Group
followed the income recognition and disclosure guidance in ASC 310-30. During the evaluation of
whether a loan was considered impaired under ASC 310-30, the Group considered a number of factors,
including the delinquency status of the loan, payment options and other loan features (i.e. reduced
documentation, interest only, or negative amortization features), the geographic location of the
borrower or collateral and the risk rating assigned to the loans. Based on the criteria, the Group
considered the entire Eurobank portfolio, except for credit cards, to be impaired and accounted for
under ASC 310-30. Credit cards were accounted under ASC 310-20. During the fourth quarter of 2010,
these credit cards were cancelled and new agreements were made with to these customers.
To the extent credit deterioration occurs in covered loans after the date of acquisition, the Group
would record an allowance for loan and lease losses. Also, the Group would record an increase in
the FDIC loss-share indemnification asset for the expected reimbursement from the FDIC under the
shared-loss agreements. For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, there have been deviations between
actual and expected cash flows in several pools of loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted
acquisition. These deviations are both positive and negative in nature. Even though actual cash
flows for the aggregate pools acquired were more than the expected cash flows for the year ended
March 31, 2011 the Group continues to evaluate these deviations to assess whether there have been
additional deterioration since the acquisition. At March 31, 2011 the Group concluded that certain
pools reflect a higher than expected credit deterioration and as such has recorded impairment on
the pools impacted. In addition, for other pools, positive deviations have been also assessed as
temporary in nature and no additions to accretable discount have been recorded at March 31, 2011.
In the event that in future periods the positive trend continues, there may be additions to the
accretable discount which will increase the yield on the pools that have positive deviations
between actual and expected cash flows.
The carrying amount of these loans included in the balance sheet amount of total loans at March 31,
2011 is as follows:
Total Loans Acquired | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Contractual balance |
$ | 1,145,058 | ||
Carrying amount |
$ | 643,392 | ||
The following tables describe the accretable yield and non-accretable discount activity for
the quarter ended March 31, 2011:
Accretable Yield | ||||
Activity | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | (148,558 | ) | |
Accretion |
14,226 | |||
Transfer to non-accretable discount |
4,091 | |||
Cost recovery |
(294 | ) | ||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
$ | (130,535 | ) | |
Non-Accretable | ||||
Discount Activity | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | (603,309 | ) | |
Principal losses |
42,863 | |||
Transfer from accretable discount |
(4,091 | ) | ||
Cost recovery |
294 | |||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
$ | (564,243 | ) | |
36
Table of Contents
The Groups recorded investment in covered loan pools that were evaluated for impairment and
the related allowance for covered loan and lease losses as of March 31, 2011 and the December 31,
2010 are as follows:
March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid | Recorded | Specific | Recorded | |||||||||||||||||
Principal | Investment | Allowance | Coverage | Investment | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Covered Loans |
||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired covered loans with specific allowance |
||||||||||||||||||||
Loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties |
$ | 63,085 | $ | 44,013 | $ | 5,019 | 11 | % | $ | 44,826 | ||||||||||
Construction and development secured by 1-4 family residential properties |
55,337 | 11,519 | 1,670 | 15 | % | 11,584 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial and other construction |
620,533 | 305,006 | 43,840 | 14 | % | 310,639 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer |
26,297 | 16,985 | 2,951 | 17 | % | 18,680 | ||||||||||||||
Total investment in impaired covered loans |
$ | 765,252 | $ | 377,523 | $ | 53,480 | 14 | % | $ | 385,729 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid | Recorded | Specific | Recorded | |||||||||||||||||
Principal | Investment | Allowance | Coverage | Investment | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Covered Loans |
||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired covered loans with specific allowance |
||||||||||||||||||||
Loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties |
$ | 64,366 | $ | 38,885 | $ | 3,582 | 9 | % | $ | 38,667 | ||||||||||
Construction and development secured by 1-4 family residential properties |
55,524 | 11,828 | 1,939 | 16 | % | 12,541 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial and other construction |
637,044 | 318,404 | 43,765 | 14 | % | 324,946 | ||||||||||||||
Total investment in impaired covered loans |
$ | 756,934 | $ | 369,117 | $ | 49,286 | 13 | % | $ | 376,154 | ||||||||||
Loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are generally considered accruing and performing loans as
the loans accrete interest income over the estimated life of the loan when cash flows are
reasonably estimable. Accordingly, acquired impaired loans that are contractually past due are
still considered to be accruing and performing loans. If the timing and amount of cash flows is not
reasonably estimable, the loans may be classified as nonaccrual loans and interest income may be
recognized on a cash basis or as a reduction of the principal amount outstanding.
As a result of impairment on various pools of covered loans the changes in the allowance for loan
and lease losses on covered loans for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was as follows:
Quarter Ended | ||||
March 31, 2011 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Balance at beginning of the period |
$ | 49,286 | ||
Provision for covered loan and lease losses |
549 | |||
FDIC loss-share portion of provision for covered loan and lease losses |
3,645 | |||
Balance at end of the period |
$ | 53,480 | ||
37
Table of Contents
NOTE 6 SERVICING ASSETS
The Group periodically sells or securitizes mortgage loans while retaining the obligation to
perform the servicing of such loans. In addition, the Group may purchase or assume the right to
service leases and mortgage loans originated by others. Whenever the Group undertakes an obligation
to service a loan or lease, management assesses whether a servicing asset and/or liability should
be recognized. A servicing asset is recognized whenever the compensation for servicing is expected
to more than adequately compensate the Group for servicing the loans and leases. Likewise, a
servicing liability would be recognized in the event that servicing fees to be received are not
expected to adequately compensate the Group for its expected cost.
All separately recognized servicing assets are recognized at fair value using the fair value
measurement method. Under the fair value measurement method, the Group measures servicing rights at
fair value at each reporting date and reports changes in fair value of servicing asset in earnings
in the period in which the changes occur, and includes these changes, if any, with mortgage banking
activities in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of servicing
rights is subject to fluctuations as a result of changes in estimated and actual prepayment speeds
and default rates and losses.
The fair value of servicing rights is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which
calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into
consideration actual and expected loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other
economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions.
At March 31, 2011 servicing assets are composed of $9.4 million ($8.9 million December 31, 2010)
related to residential mortgage loans and $598 thousand of leasing servicing assets acquired in the
FDIC-assisted acquisition on April 30, 2010.
The following table presents the changes in servicing rights measured using the fair value method
for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Fair value at beginning of period |
$ | 9,695 | $ | 7,120 | ||||
Servicing from mortgage securitizations or assets transfers |
520 | 685 | ||||||
Changes due to payments on loans |
(608 | ) | (104 | ) | ||||
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions |
356 | (132 | ) | |||||
Fair value at end of period |
$ | 9,963 | $ | 7,569 | ||||
The following table presents key economic assumptions ranges used in measuring the mortgage
related servicing asset fair value:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Constant prepayment rate |
7.87% - 15.74 | % | 8.40% - 29.58 | % | ||||
Discount rate |
11.00% - 14.00 | % | 11.00% - 14.00 | % |
The following table presents key economic assumptions ranges used in measuring the
leasing related servicing asset fair value:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||
2011 | ||||
Discount rate |
13.58% - 17.38 | % |
38
Table of Contents
The sensitivity of the current fair value of servicing assets to immediate 10 percent and 20
percent adverse changes in the above key assumptions were as follow:
March 31, 2011 | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
Mortgage related servicing asset |
||||
Carrying value of mortgage servicing asset |
$ | 9,365 | ||
Constant prepayment rate |
||||
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change |
$ | (344 | ) | |
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change |
$ | (668 | ) | |
Discount rate |
||||
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change |
$ | (428 | ) | |
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change |
$ | (820 | ) | |
Leasing servicing asset |
||||
Carrying value of leasing servicing asset |
$ | 598 | ||
Discount rate |
||||
Decrease in fair value due to 10% adverse change |
(7 | ) | ||
Decrease in fair value due to 20% adverse change |
$ | (14 | ) |
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate,
changes in fair value based on a 10 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be
extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may
not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the
fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption.
In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in
market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or offset the
sensitivities.
Mortgage banking activities, a component of total banking and wealth management revenues in the
consolidated statements of operations, include the changes from period to period in the fair value
of the loan servicing rights, which may result from changes in the valuation model inputs or
assumptions (principally reflecting changes in discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions) and
other changes, including changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows.
Servicing fee income is based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal and is
recorded as income when earned. Servicing fees on mortgage loans totaled $719 thousand and $485
thousand for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. There were no late fees and
ancillary fees recorded in such periods. Servicing fees on leases amounted to $441 thousand for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011. There were no servicing fees on leases during the quarter ended March
31, 2010.
39
Table of Contents
NOTE 7 PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Premises and equipment at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization as follows:
Useful Life | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
(Years) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Land |
| $ | 2,328 | $ | 2,328 | |||||||
Buildings and improvements |
40 | 6,295 | 6,301 | |||||||||
Leasehold improvements |
510 | 20,440 | 20,564 | |||||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
37 | 10,009 | 10,099 | |||||||||
Information technology and other |
37 | 19,190 | 19,074 | |||||||||
58,262 | 58,366 | |||||||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(34,909 | ) | (34,425 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 23,353 | $ | 23,941 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment for the quarters ended March 31, 2011
and 2010, totaled $1.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively. These are included in the
consolidated statements of operations as part of occupancy and equipment expenses.
NOTE 8 DERIVATIVE ACTIVITIES
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, losses of $4.0 million were recognized and reflected as
Derivative Activities in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations. These losses were
mainly due to realized losses of $4.3 million from terminations of forward-settlement swaps with a
notional amount of $1.25 billion. These terminations allowed the Group to enter into new
forward-settlement swap contracts with a notional amount of $950 million, all of which were
designated as hedging instruments. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010 losses of $10.6 million
were recognized and reflected as Derivative Activities in the unaudited consolidated statements
of operations. These losses were mainly due to the fair value adjustment to the forward-settlement
swaps held by the Group at March 31, 2010.
Forward-settlement Swaps
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Group terminated all of its $1.250 billion open
forward-settlement swaps with realized losses of $4.3 million. At the same time the Group entered
into $950 million of new forward-settlement swaps, all of which were designated as cash flow
hedges. The Group entered into the forward-settlement swaps to hedge the variability of future
interest cash flows of forecasted wholesale borrowings, attributable to changes in the one-month
LIBOR rate. Once the forecasted wholesale borrowings transactions occur, the interest rate swap
will effectively fix the Groups interest payments on an amount of forecasted interest expense
attributable to the one-month LIBOR corresponding to the swap notional stated rate.
These forward-settlement swaps were designated as cash flow hedges for the forecasted wholesale
borrowings transactions and properly documented as such, therefore, qualifying for cash flow hedge
accounting. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income to the extent there is no significant ineffectiveness in the cash flow hedges.
Currently, the Group does not expect to reclassify any amount included in other comprehensive
income related to these forward-settlement swaps to earnings in the next twelve months.
There were no derivatives designated as a hedge as of December 31, 2010.
40
Table of Contents
A derivative asset of $7.1 million was recognized at March 31, 2011, related to the valuation of
these swaps. The following table shows a summary of these swaps and their terms, at March 31, 2011:
Trade | Settlement | |||||||||||||||
Notional Amount | Fixed Rate | Date | Date | Maturity Date | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 100,000 | 1.1275% |
03/18/11 | 12/28/11 | 06/28/13 | |||||||||||
100,000 | 1.2725% |
03/18/11 | 12/28/11 | 09/28/13 | ||||||||||||
125,000 | 1.6550% |
03/18/11 | 05/09/12 | 02/09/14 | ||||||||||||
100,000 | 1.5300% |
03/18/11 | 12/28/11 | 03/28/14 | ||||||||||||
125,000 | 1.7700% |
03/18/11 | 05/09/12 | 05/09/14 | ||||||||||||
100,000 | 1.8975% |
03/18/11 | 05/09/12 | 08/09/14 | ||||||||||||
100,000 | 1.9275% |
03/18/11 | 12/28/11 | 01/28/15 | ||||||||||||
100,000 | 2.0000% |
03/18/11 | 12/28/11 | 03/28/15 | ||||||||||||
100,000 | 2.1100% |
03/18/11 | 12/28/11 | 06/28/15 | ||||||||||||
$ | 950,000 | |||||||||||||||
A gain of $7.1 million was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income related to the
valuation of these swaps during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Swap Options
In November 2010, the Group purchased options to enter into interest rate swaps, not
designated as cash flow hedges, with an aggregate notional amount of $250 million. At March 31,
2011, the purchased options used to manage the exposure on the interest rate swaps represented an
asset of $7.8 million in the consolidated statements of financial position. The following table
shows a summary of these swap options and their terms, at March 31, 2011:
Trade | Option | Swap Start | Swap Maturity | |||||||||||||||||
Notional Amount | Fixed Rate | Date | Maturity Date | Date | Date | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 100,000 | 2.1225% |
11/15/10 | 08/10/12 | 08/14/12 | 05/14/15 | ||||||||||||||
150,000 | 2.6400% |
11/15/10 | 12/04/12 | 12/06/12 | 06/06/16 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 250,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Options tied to Standard & Poors 500 Stock Market Index
The Group offers its customers certificates of deposit with an option tied to the performance of
the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index (S&P Index). The Group uses option agreements with
major broker-dealer companies to manage its exposure to changes in this index. Under the terms of
the option agreements, the Group receives the average increase in the month-end value of the index
in exchange for a fixed premium. The changes in fair value of the option agreements used to manage
the exposure in the stock market in the certificates of deposit are recorded in earnings. At March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the purchased options used to manage the exposure to the stock
market on stock indexed deposits represented an asset of $11.8 million (notional amount of $147.5
million) and $9.9 million (notional amount of $149.0 million), respectively; the options sold to
customers embedded in the certificates of deposit and recorded as deposits in the unaudited
consolidated statements of financial condition, represented a liability of $14.3 million (notional
amount of $142.0 million) and $12.8 million (notional amount of $143.4 million), respectively, and
are included in other liabilities on the unaudited consolidated statements of financial condition.
41
Table of Contents
NOTE 9 ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE AND OTHER ASSETS
Accrued interest receivable at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consists of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Loans |
$ | 10,913 | $ | 11,068 | ||||
Investments |
17,721 | 17,648 | ||||||
$ | 28,634 | $ | 28,716 | |||||
Other assets at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consist of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Prepaid FDIC insurance |
$ | 15,173 | $ | 16,796 | ||||
Servicing assets |
9,963 | 9,695 | ||||||
Other prepaid expenses |
8,133 | 8,224 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,662 | 3,662 | ||||||
Mortgage tax credits |
3,105 | 3,105 | ||||||
Other repossessed assets (covered by FDIC shared-loss agreements) |
2,479 | 2,341 | ||||||
Debt issuance costs |
1,991 | 2,299 | ||||||
Core deposit intangible |
1,292 | 1,328 | ||||||
Investment in Statutory Trust |
1,086 | 1,086 | ||||||
Accounts receivable and other assets |
15,722 | 15,886 | ||||||
$ | 62,606 | $ | 64,422 | |||||
On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule requiring insured depository institutions
to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for
all of 2010, 2011, and 2012, on December 31, 2009, along with each institutions risk-based deposit
insurance assessment for the third quarter of 2009. The prepayment balance of the assessment for
2010, 2011 and 2012 amounted to $15.2 million and $16.8 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively.
In December 2007, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico established mortgage loan tax credits for
financial institutions that provided financing for the acquisition of new homes. At March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, mortgage loan tax credits for the Group
amounted to $3.1 million in both periods.
Other repossessed assets amounting to $2.5 million and $2.4 million at March 31, 2011 and December
31, 2010, respectively, represent covered assets under the FDIC shared-loss agreements and are
related to the Eurobank leasing portfolio acquired under the FDIC-assisted acquisition.
In March 2009, the Groups banking subsidiary issued $105 million in notes guaranteed under the
FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. Shortly after issuance of the notes, the Group paid
$3.2 million (equivalent to an annual fee of 100 basis points) to the FDIC to maintain the FDIC
guarantee coverage until the maturity of the notes. These costs have been deferred and are being
amortized over the term of the notes. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, this deferred issue
cost was $2.0 million and $2.3 million, respectively.
42
Table of Contents
NOTE 10 DEPOSITS AND RELATED INTEREST
Total deposits as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consist of the following:
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Non-interest bearing demand deposits |
$ | 175,679 | $ | 170,705 | ||||
Interest-bearing savings and demand deposits |
1,012,710 | 1,019,539 | ||||||
Individual retirement accounts |
358,688 | 361,972 | ||||||
Retail certificates of deposit |
490,313 | 477,180 | ||||||
Total retail deposits |
2,037,390 | 2,029,396 | ||||||
Institutional deposits |
240,779 | 280,617 | ||||||
Brokered deposits |
223,303 | 278,875 | ||||||
$ | 2,501,472 | $ | 2,588,888 | |||||
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the weighted average interest rate of the Groups
deposits was 1.91%, and 2.12%, respectively, inclusive of non-interest bearing deposits of $175.6
million, and $170.6 million, respectively. Interest expense for the quarters ended March 31, 2011
and 2010 is set forth below:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Demand and savings deposits |
$ | 4,597 | $ | 3,904 | ||||
Certificates of deposit |
7,617 | 7,339 | ||||||
$ | 12,214 | $ | 11,243 | |||||
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, time deposits in denominations of $100 thousand or
higher amounted to $575.5 million, and $590.0 million, including public fund deposits from various
local government agencies of $65.1 million and $65.3 million at a weighted average rate of 0.00% in
both periods, which were collateralized with investment securities with fair value of $69.8 million
and $73.4 million, respectively.
Excluding equity indexed options in the amount of $14.3 million, which are used by the Group to
manage its exposure to the Standard & Poors 500 stock market index, and also excluding accrued
interest of $5.7 million and unamortized deposit discounts in the amount of $7.9 million, the
scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit at March 31, 2011 are as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
Within one year: |
||||
Three (3) months or less |
$ | 379,282 | ||
Over 3 months through 1 year |
465,824 | |||
845,106 | ||||
Over 1 through 2 years |
264,556 | |||
Over 2 through 3 years |
115,852 | |||
Over 3 through 4 years |
43,202 | |||
Over 4 through 5 years |
32,341 | |||
$ | 1,301,057 | |||
The aggregate amount of overdraft in demand deposit accounts that were reclassified to loans
amounted to $8.5 million as of March 31, 2011 ($7.6 million December 31, 2010).
43
Table of Contents
NOTE 11 BORROWINGS
Short Term Borrowings
At March 31, 2011, short term borrowings amounted to $32.3 million (December 31, 2010 $42.5
million) which mainly consist of overnight borrowings with a weighted average rate of 0.53%
(December 31, 2010 0.60%).
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase
At March 31, 2011, securities underlying agreements to repurchase were delivered to, and are being
held by, the counterparties with whom the repurchase agreements were transacted. The counterparties
have agreed to resell to the Group the same or similar securities at the maturity of the
agreements.
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, securities sold under agreements to repurchase (classified
by counterparty), excluding accrued interest in the amount of $6.6 million and $6.8 million,
respectively, were as follows:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value of | Fair Value of | |||||||||||||||
Borrowing | Underlying | Borrowing | Underlying | |||||||||||||
Balance | Collateral | Balance | Collateral | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. |
$ | 1,600,000 | $ | 1,739,088 | $ | 1,600,000 | $ | 1,752,619 | ||||||||
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC |
1,250,000 | 1,323,982 | 1,250,000 | 1,325,392 | ||||||||||||
UBS Financial Services Inc. |
500,000 | 597,404 | 500,000 | 605,706 | ||||||||||||
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA |
100,000 | 119,495 | 100,000 | 119,997 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,450,000 | $ | 3,779,969 | $ | 3,450,000 | $ | 3,803,714 | ||||||||
44
Table of Contents
The original terms of the Groups structured repurchase agreements range between three and ten
years, and except for the $300 million repurchase agreement that
settled on March 28, 2011 with a weighted average coupon
of 2.86% and maturity of September 28, 2014 (as described below), the counterparties have the right to exercise put
options at par on a quarterly basis before their contractual maturity from one to three years after
the agreements settlement dates. The following table shows a summary of these agreements and their
terms, excluding accrued interest in the amount of $6.6 million, at March 31, 2011:
Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowing | Average | Maturity | Next Put | |||||||||||||||||
Year of Maturity | Balance | Coupon | Settlement Date | Date | Date | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 100,000 | 4.17 | % | 12/28/2006 | 12/28/2011 | 6/28/2011 | ||||||||||||||
50,000 | 4.13 | % | 12/28/2006 | 12/28/2011 | 6/28/2011 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.29 | % | 12/28/2006 | 12/28/2011 | 6/28/2011 | |||||||||||||||
350,000 | 4.25 | % | 12/28/2006 | 12/28/2011 | 6/28/2011 | |||||||||||||||
600,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||
350,000 | 4.26 | % | 5/9/2007 | 5/9/2012 | 5/9/2011 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.50 | % | 8/14/2007 | 8/14/2012 | 5/16/2011 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.47 | % | 9/13/2007 | 9/13/2012 | 6/13/2011 | |||||||||||||||
150,000 | 4.31 | % | 3/6/2007 | 12/6/2012 | 6/6/2011 | |||||||||||||||
700,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||
100,000 | 4.72 | % | 7/27/2007 | 7/27/2014 | 4/27/2011 | |||||||||||||||
300,000 | 2.86 | % | 3/28/2011 | 9/28/2014 | N/A | |||||||||||||||
400,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
||||||||||||||||||||
500,000 | 4.67 | % | 3/2/2007 | 3/2/2017 | 6/2/2011 | |||||||||||||||
250,000 | 0.25 | % | 3/2/2007 | 3/2/2017 | 6/2/2011 | |||||||||||||||
100,000 | 0.00 | % | 6/6/2007 | 3/6/2017 | 6/6/2011 | |||||||||||||||
900,000 | 0.00 | % | 3/6/2007 | 6/6/2017 | 6/6/2011 | |||||||||||||||
1,750,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 3,450,000 | 2.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||
None of the structured repurchase agreements referred to above with put dates up to the date
of this filing were put by the counterparties at their corresponding put dates. Such repurchase
agreements include $1.25 billion, which reset at each put date at a formula which is based on the
three-month LIBOR rate less fifteen times the difference between the ten-year SWAP rate and the
two-year SWAP rate, with a minimum of 0.00% on $1.0 billion and 0.25% on $250 million, and a
maximum of 10.6%. These repurchase agreements bear the respective minimum rates of 0.0% and 0.25%
to at least their next put dates scheduled for June 2011.
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
Advances are received from the FHLB under an agreement whereby the Group is required to maintain a
minimum amount of qualifying collateral with a fair value of at least 110% of the outstanding
advances. At March 31, 2011, these advances were secured by mortgage loans amounting to $592.6
million. Also, at March 31, 2011, the Group has an additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB of
$153.9 million. At March 31, 2011, the weighted average remaining maturity of FHLBs advances was
20.19 months (December 31, 2010 23.15 months).
45
Table of Contents
In 2007, the Group restructured most of its FHLB advances portfolio into longer-term, structured
advances. The original terms of these advances range between five and seven years, and the FHLB has
the right to exercise put options at par on a quarterly basis before the contractual maturity of
the advances from six months to one year after the advances settlement dates. The following table
shows a summary of these advances and their terms, excluding accrued interest in the amount of $1.7
million, at March 31, 2011:
Weighted-Average | ||||||||||||||
Year of Maturity | Borrowing Balance | Coupon | Settlement Date | Maturity Date | Next Put Date | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
2012 |
||||||||||||||
$ | 25,000 | 4.37 | % | 5/4/2007 | 5/4/2012 | 5/4/2011 | ||||||||
25,000 | 4.57 | % | 7/24/2007 | 7/24/2012 | 4/24/2011 | |||||||||
25,000 | 4.26 | % | 7/30/2007 | 7/30/2012 | 4/31/2011 | |||||||||
50,000 | 4.33 | % | 8/10/2007 | 8/10/2012 | 5/11/2011 | |||||||||
100,000 | 4.09 | % | 8/16/2007 | 8/16/2012 | 5/16/2011 | |||||||||
225,000 | ||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||
25,000 | 4.20 | % | 5/8/2007 | 5/8/2014 | 5/8/2011 | |||||||||
30,000 | 4.22 | % | 5/11/2007 | 5/11/2014 | 5/10/2011 | |||||||||
55,000 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 280,000 | 4.24 | % | |||||||||||
None of the structured advances from the FHLB referred to above with put dates up to the date
of this filing were put by the FHLB at their corresponding put dates.
Subordinated Capital Notes
Subordinated capital notes amounted to $36.1 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
In August 2003, the Statutory Trust II, a special purpose entity of the Group, was formed for the
purpose of issuing trust redeemable preferred securities. In September 2003, $35.0 million of trust
redeemable preferred securities were issued by the Statutory Trust II as part of pooled
underwriting transactions. Pooled underwriting involves participating with other bank holding
companies in issuing the securities through a special purpose pooling vehicle created by the
underwriters.
The proceeds from this issuance were used by the Statutory Trust II to purchase a like amount of
floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated capital note)
issued by the Group. The subordinated capital note has a par value of $36.1 million, bears interest
based on 3-month LIBOR plus 295 basis points (3.26% at March 31, 2011; 3.25% at December 31, 2010),
payable quarterly, and matures on September 17, 2033. The subordinated capital note purchased by
the Statutory Trust II may be called at par after five years and quarterly thereafter (next call
date June 2011). The trust redeemable preferred securities have the same maturity and call
provisions as the subordinated capital notes. The subordinated deferrable interest debentures
issued by the Group are accounted for as a liability denominated as subordinated capital note on
the consolidated statements of financial condition.
The subordinated capital note is treated as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes. Under Federal
Reserve Board rules, restricted core capital elements, which are qualifying trust preferred
securities, qualifying cumulative perpetual preferred stock (and related surplus) and certain
minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, are limited in the aggregate to no more than 25%
of a bank holding companys core capital elements (including restricted core capital elements), net
of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. However, under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act), bank holding companies are prohibited
from including in their Tier 1 capital hybrid debt and equity securities, including trust preferred
securities, issued on or after May 19, 2010. The Group is therefore permitted to continue to
include its existing trust preferred securities as Tier 1 capital.
46
Table of Contents
FDIC- Guaranteed Term Notes Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
The Groups banking subsidiary issued in March 2009 $105 million in notes guaranteed under the FDIC
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. These notes are due on March 16, 2012, bear interest at a
2.75% fixed rate, and are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Interest on the
notes is payable on the 16th of each March and September, beginning September 16, 2009. Shortly
after issuance of the notes, the Group paid $3.2 million (equivalent to an annual fee of 100 basis
points) to the FDIC to maintain the FDIC guarantee coverage until the maturity of the notes. This
cost has been deferred and is being amortized over the term of the notes.
NOTE 12 INCOME TAXES
On
January 31, 2011, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law
the 2011 Code. As such, the 1994 Code would be gradually repealed by
the 2011 Code as its provisions started to take effect, with some
exceptions, as of January 1, 2011. For corporate taxpayers, the 2011 Code retains the 20% regular income tax rate but
establishes significant lower surtax rates. The 2011 Code provides a surtax rate from 5% to 10% for
years starting after December 31, 2010, but before January 1, 2014. That surtax rate may reduce to
5% after December 31, 2013, if certain economic and budgetary
control tests are met by the Government of Puerto Rico. If
such economic tests are not met, the reduction of the surtax rate will start when such economic
tests are met. In the case of a controlled group of corporations the determination of which surtax
rate applies will be made by adding the net taxable income of each of the entities members of the
controlled group reduced by the surtax deduction. The 2011 Code also provides a surtax deduction of
$750,000. In the case of controlled group of corporations, the surtax deduction should be
distributed among the members of the controlled group. The alternative minimum tax (AMT) is 20%.
The 2011 Code eliminates the 5% additional surtax which was established by Act No. 7 of March 9,
2009, and the 5% recapture of the benefit of the income tax tables.
Under the 2011 Code all companies are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to
file consolidated returns. The Group and its subsidiaries are subject to Puerto Rico regular income
tax or AMT on income earned from all sources. The AMT is payable if it exceeds regular income tax.
The excess of AMT over regular income tax paid in any one year may be used to offset regular income
tax in future years, subject to certain limitations.
The effect of the 2011 Code on net deferred tax asset was $5.4 million, reflected as income tax
expense in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations. The Group classifies unrecognized
tax benefits in income taxes payable. These gross unrecognized tax benefits would affect the
effective tax rate if realized. The balance of unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2011 was $6.4
million (December 31, 2010 $6.3 million), and variance is mainly associated with accrued
interests. The tax periods from 2005 to 2009, remain subject to examination by the Puerto Rico
Department of Treasury.
The Groups policy to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within
the provision for taxes on the consolidated statements of operations did not change as a result of
implementing these provisions. The Group had accrued $1.5 million at March 31, 2011 (December 31,
2010 $1.5 million) for the payment of interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax
benefits.
NOTE 13 STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Preferred Stock
On May 28, 1999, the Group issued 1,340,000 shares of 7.125% Noncumulative Monthly Income Preferred
Stock, Series A, at $25 per share. Proceeds from issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock, were
$32.4 million, net of $1.1 million of issuance costs. The Series A Preferred Stock has the
following characteristics: (1) annual dividends of $1.78 per share, payable monthly, if declared by
the Board of Directors; missed dividends are not cumulative, (2) redeemable at the Groups option
beginning on May 30, 2004, (3) no mandatory redemption or stated maturity date and (4) liquidation
value of $25 per share.
On September 30, 2003, the Group issued 1,380,000 shares of 7.0% Noncumulative Monthly Income
Preferred Stock, Series B, at $25 per share. Proceeds from issuance of the Series B Preferred
Stock, were $33.1 million, net of $1.4 million of issuance costs and expenses. The Series B
Preferred Stock has the following characteristics: (1) annual dividends of $1.75 per share, payable
monthly, if declared by the Board of Directors; missed dividends are not cumulative, (2) redeemable
at the Groups option beginning on October 31, 2008, (3) no mandatory redemption or stated maturity
date, and (4) liquidation value of $25 per share.
At the annual meeting of shareholders held on April 30, 2010, the shareholders approved an increase
of the number of authorized
47
Table of Contents
shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000.
On April 30, 2010, the Group issued 200,000 shares of Mandatorily Convertible Non-Cumulative
Non-Voting Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (the Series C Preferred Stock), through a private
placement. The Series C Preferred Stock had a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and was
converted to common stock on Jul 8, 2010 at a conversion price of $15.015 per share. The offering
resulted in net proceeds of $189.4 million after deducting offering costs. On May 13, 2010, the
Group made a capital contribution of $179.0 million to its banking subsidiary.
The difference between the conversion price of $15.015 per share and the market
price of the common stock on April 30, 2010 ($16.72) was considered a contingent beneficial
conversion feature on June 30, 2010, when the conversion was approved by the majority of the
shareholders. Such feature amounted to $22.7 million at June 30, 2010 and was recorded as a deemed
dividend on preferred stock.
Common Stock
On March 19, 2010, the Group completed the public offering of 8,740,000 shares of its common stock.
The offering resulted in net proceeds of $94.6 million after deducting offering costs. On March 25,
2010, the Group made a capital contribution of $93.0 million to its banking subsidiary.
At the annual meeting of shareholders held on April 30, 2010, the shareholders approved an increase
of the number of authorized shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, from 40,000,000 to
100,000,000.
At a special meeting of shareholders of the Group held on June 30, 2010, the majority of the
shareholders approved the issuance of 13,320,000 shares of the Groups common stock upon the
conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock, which was converted on July 8, 2010 at a conversion
price of $15.015 per share.
Treasury Stock
In February 2011, the Group announced that its Board of Directors had approved a new stock
repurchase program pursuant to which the Group is authorized to purchase in the open market up to
$30.0 million of its outstanding shares of common stock. Any shares of common stock repurchased are
to be held by the Group as treasury shares.
The Group records treasury stock purchases under the cost method whereby the entire cost of the acquire stock is recorded as treasury stock.
The new program replaced the prior $15.0 million
program. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Group repurchased 1,028,579 shares of common
stock at a cost of approximately $12.5 million. The approximate dollar value of shares that may
yet be repurchased under the program amounted to $17.5 million
at March 31, 2011. The number of shares that may yet be purchased under the
program amounts to 1,396,124, and was calculated by dividing the remaining balance of approximately $17.5 million by $12.55 (closing price of the Groups
common stock at March 31, 2011).
The following table presents the shares repurchased during the quarter ended March 31, 2011:
Total number of | ||||||||||||
shares purchased | ||||||||||||
as part of stock | ||||||||||||
Total number of | Average price paid | repurchase | ||||||||||
shares purchased | per share | programs | ||||||||||
January 2011 |
| $ | | | ||||||||
February 2011 |
476,132 | $ | 12.12 | 476,132 | ||||||||
March 2011 |
552,447 | $ | 12.23 | 552,447 | ||||||||
Total |
1,028,579 | $ | 12.18 | 1,028,579 | ||||||||
48
Table of Contents
The activity in connection with common shares held in treasury by the Group for the quarters
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is set forth below:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Dollar | Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
1,459 | $ | 16,732 | $ | 1,504 | $ | 17,142 | |||||||||
Common shares used for exercise of restricted stock units |
(46 | ) | (500 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Common shares repurchased as part of the stock repurchase program |
1,029 | 12,530 | | | ||||||||||||
Common shares used to match defined contribution plan, net |
(9 | ) | (16 | ) | (8 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||
End of period |
2,433 | $ | 28,746 | 1,496 | $ | 17,127 | ||||||||||
Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Group (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital
requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by
regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Groups and the Banks
financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, the Group and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as
calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also
subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other
factors. This has changed under the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires federal banking regulators to
establish minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements, on a consolidated basis, for
insured institutions, depository institutions, depository institution holding companies, and
non-bank financial companies supervised by the Federal Reserve Board. The minimum leverage and
risk-based capital requirements are to be determined based on the minimum ratios established for
insured depository institutions under prompt corrective action regulations.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Group and
the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and
Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the
regulations) and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined in the regulations). As of March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Group and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to
which they are subject.
49
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the FDIC categorized the Bank as well capitalized
under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized,
an institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios
as set forth in the following tables. The Groups and the Banks actual capital amounts and ratios
as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
Minimum Capital | ||||||||||||||||
Actual | Requirement | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Group Ratios |
||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 714,936 | 31.91 | % | $ | 179,251 | 8.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 686,202 | 30.63 | % | $ | 89,625 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 Capital to Total Assets |
$ | 686,202 | 9.52 | % | $ | 288,462 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 727,689 | 32.26 | % | $ | 180,455 | 8.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 698,836 | 30.98 | % | $ | 90,228 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 Capital to Total Assets |
$ | 698,836 | 9.56 | % | $ | 292,449 | 4.00 | % |
Minimum to be Well | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized Under | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum Capital | Prompt Corrective | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Requirement | Action Provisions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank Ratios |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 677,508 | 30.65 | % | $ | 176,821 | 8.00 | % | $ | 221,027 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 649,149 | 29.37 | % | $ | 88,411 | 4.00 | % | $ | 132,616 | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital to Total Assets |
$ | 649,149 | 9.18 | % | $ | 282,946 | 4.00 | % | $ | 353,683 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 694,461 | 31.17 | % | $ | 178,226 | 8.00 | % | $ | 222,782 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets |
$ | 665,952 | 29.89 | % | $ | 89,113 | 4.00 | % | $ | 133,669 | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital to Total Assets |
$ | 665,952 | 9.28 | % | $ | 287,060 | 4.00 | % | $ | 358,825 | 5.00 | % |
The Groups ability to pay dividends to its shareholders and other activities can be
restricted if its capital falls below levels established by the Federal Reserve Boards guidelines.
In addition, any bank holding company whose capital falls below levels specified in the guidelines
can be required to implement a plan to increase capital.
50
Table of Contents
Equity-Based Compensation Plan
The Omnibus Plan provides for equity-based compensation incentives through the grant of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and dividend
equivalents, as well as equity-based performance awards. The Omnibus Plan replaced and superseded
the Stock Option Plans. All outstanding stock options under the Stock Option Plans continue in full
force and effect, subject to their original terms.
The activity in outstanding options for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is set forth
below:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Number | Average | Number | Average | |||||||||||||
Of | Exercise | Of | Exercise | |||||||||||||
Options | Price | Options | Price | |||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
765,989 | $ | 15.25 | 514,376 | $ | 16.86 | ||||||||||
Options granted |
69,800 | 11.82 | 132,700 | 11.50 | ||||||||||||
Options exercised |
(250 | ) | 10.29 | | | |||||||||||
Options forfeited |
(16,496 | ) | 18.08 | | | |||||||||||
End of period |
819,043 | $ | 14.90 | 647,076 | $ | 15.76 | ||||||||||
The following table summarizes the range of exercise prices and the weighted average remaining
contractual life of the options outstanding at March 31, 2011:
Outstanding | Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contract | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Life | Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Remaining | Number of | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices | Options | Exercise Price | (Years) | Options | Price | |||||||||||||||
$5.63 to $8.45 |
15,131 | $ | 8.28 | 8.1 | 1 | $ | 7.74 | |||||||||||||
8.45 to 11.27 |
2,000 | 10.29 | 6.4 | 500 | 10.29 | |||||||||||||||
11.27 to 14.09 |
572,427 | 12.14 | 7.4 | 170,902 | 12.41 | |||||||||||||||
14.09 to 16.90 |
62,035 | 15.60 | 3.4 | 54,035 | 15.68 | |||||||||||||||
19.72 to 22.54 |
25,050 | 20.68 | 3.9 | 20,800 | 20.44 | |||||||||||||||
22.54 to 25.35 |
83,350 | 23.99 | 3.0 | 83,350 | 23.99 | |||||||||||||||
25.35 to 28.17 |
59,050 | 27.46 | 3.6 | 59,050 | 27.46 | |||||||||||||||
819,043 | $ | 14.90 | 6.3 | 388,638 | 18.06 | |||||||||||||||
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
$ | 392,953 | $ | 58,247 | ||||||||||||||||
The average fair value of each option granted during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was
$6.43. The average fair value of each option granted was estimated at the date of the grant using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for
use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no restrictions and are fully
transferable and negotiable in a free trading market. Black-Scholes does not consider the
employment, transfer or vesting restrictions that are inherent in the Groups stock options. Use of
an option valuation model, as required by GAAP, includes highly subjective assumptions based on
long-term predictions, including the expected stock price volatility and average life of each
option grant.
51
Table of Contents
The following assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of the options granted during the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
Quarter Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Weighted Average Assumptions: |
||||||||
Dividend yield |
1.63 | % | 1.39 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
59.04 | % | 58.81 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
3.11 | % | 3.44 | % | ||||
Expected life (in years) |
8.0 | 8.0 |
The following table summarizes the restricted units activity under the Omnibus Plan for the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, 2011 | March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||
Restricted | Grant Date | Restricted | Grant Date | |||||||||||||
Units | Fair Value | Units | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
243,525 | $ | 13.43 | 147,625 | $ | 14.64 | ||||||||||
Restricted units granted |
39,500 | 11.82 | 53,500 | 11.40 | ||||||||||||
Restricted units lapsed |
(45,616 | ) | 20.74 | | | |||||||||||
Restricted units forfeited |
(9,238 | ) | 13.38 | (400 | ) | 21.86 | ||||||||||
End of period |
228,171 | $ | 11.69 | 200,725 | $ | 13.76 | ||||||||||
Legal Surplus
The Banking Act requires that a minimum of 10% of the Banks net income for the year be transferred
to a reserve fund until such fund (legal surplus) equals the total paid in capital on common and
preferred stock. At March 31, 2011, legal surplus amounted to $46.7 million (December 31, 2010 -
$46.3 million). The amount transferred to the legal surplus account is not available for the
payment of dividends to shareholders. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy
statement that bank holding companies should generally pay dividends only from operating earnings
of the current and preceding two years.
Earnings per Common Share
The calculation of earnings per common share for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 is as
follows:
Quarter ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,081 | $ | 11,936 | ||||
Less: Dividends on preferred stock |
(1,201 | ) | (1,201 | ) | ||||
Income available to common shareholders |
$ | 1,880 | $ | 10,735 | ||||
Average common shares outstanding and equivalents |
46,179 | 25,932 | ||||||
Earnings per common share basic |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.42 | ||||
Earnings per common share diluted |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.41 | ||||
52
Table of Contents
For the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, weighted-average stock options with an
anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share not included in the calculation amounted to 572,875 and
416,176, respectively.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income tax, as of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, consisted of:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale which are not other-than-temporarily impaired |
$ | 25,359 | $ | 39,094 | ||||
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges |
7,123 | | ||||||
Income tax effect |
(2,163 | ) | (2,107 | ) | ||||
$ | 30,319 | $ | 36,987 | |||||
NOTE 14 FAIR VALUE
As discussed in Note 1, the Group follows the fair value measurement framework under GAAP.
Fair Value Measurement
The fair value measurement framework defines fair value as the exchange price that would be
received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. This framework also establishes a fair value hierarchy which
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs previously
described that may be used to measure fair value.
Money market investments
The fair value of money market investments is based on the carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated statements of financial condition as these are reasonable estimates of fair value given the short-term nature of the instruments. |
Investment securities
The fair value of investment securities is based on quoted market prices, when available, or market
prices provided by recognized broker-dealers. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair
value is based upon externally developed models that use both observable and unobservable inputs
depending on the market activity of the instrument. Structured credit investments are classified as
Level 3. The estimated fair value of the structured credit investments are determined by using a
third-party cash flow valuation model to calculate the present value of projected future cash
flows. The assumptions, which are highly uncertain and require a high degree of judgment, include
primarily market discount rates, current spreads, duration, leverage, default, home price
depreciation, and loss rates. The assumptions used are drawn from a wide array of data sources,
including the performance of the collateral underlying each deal. The external-based valuation,
which is obtained at least on a quarterly basis, is analyzed and its assumptions are evaluated and
incorporated in either an internal-based valuation model when deemed necessary or compared to
counterparties prices and agreed by management.
53
Table of Contents
Derivative instruments
The fair values of the derivative instruments were provided by valuation experts and
counterparties. Certain derivatives with limited market activity are valued using externally
developed models that consider unobservable market parameters. Based on their valuation
methodology, derivative instruments are classified as Level 3. The Group offers its customers
certificates of deposit with an option tied to the performance of the S&P Index, and uses equity
indexed option agreements with major broker-dealer companies to manage its exposure to changes in
this index. Their fair value is obtained through the use of an external based valuation that was
thoroughly evaluated and adopted by management as its measurement tool for these options. The
payoff of these options is linked to the average value of the S&P Index on a specific set of dates
during the life of the option. The methodology uses an average rate option or a cash-settled option
whose payoff is based on the difference between the expected average value of the S&P Index during
the remaining life
of the option and the strike price at inception. The assumptions, which are uncertain and require a
degree of judgment, include primarily S&P Index volatility, forward interest rate projections,
estimated index dividend payout, and leverage.
Servicing assets
Servicing assets do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices. Servicing assets
are priced using a discounted cash flow model. The valuation model considers servicing fees,
portfolio characteristics, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary
revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Due to unobservable nature of certain
valuation inputs, the servicing rights are classified as Level 3.
Loans receivable considered impaired that are collateral dependent
The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from
appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in
similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 310-10-35. Currently, the associated
loans considered impaired are classified as Level 3.
Foreclosed real estate
Foreclosed real estate includes real estate properties securing residential mortgage and commercial
loans. The fair value of foreclosed real estate may be determined using an external appraisal,
broker price option or an internal valuation. These foreclosed assets are classified as Level 3
given certain internal adjustments that may be made to external appraisals.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial liabilities
for which the Group has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
| 3,532,815 | $ | 55,115 | $ | 3,587,930 | ||||||||||
Money market investments |
2,060 | | | 2,060 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
| 15,007 | 11,764 | 26,771 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
| | (14,316 | ) | (14,316 | ) | ||||||||||
Servicing assets |
| | 9,963 | 9,963 | ||||||||||||
$ | 2,060 | 3,547,822 | $ | 62,526 | $ | 3,612,408 | ||||||||||
54
Table of Contents
December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
| 3,658,371 | $ | 41,693 | $ | 3,700,064 | ||||||||||
Money market investments |
111,728 | | | 111,728 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
| 18,445 | 9,870 | 28,315 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
| (64 | ) | (12,830 | ) | (12,894 | ) | |||||||||
Servicing assets |
| | 9,695 | 9,695 | ||||||||||||
$ | 111,728 | 3,676,752 | $ | 48,428 | $ | 3,836,908 | ||||||||||
The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the quarters ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010:
Total Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Quarter ended March 31, 2011) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Rico | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Government | Derivative | Derivative | ||||||||||||||||||||||
and political | asset (S&P | liability (S&P | Servicing | |||||||||||||||||||||
Level 3 Instruments Only | CDOs | CLOs | subdivisions | Options) | Options) | assets | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 16,143 | $ | 25,550 | $ | | $ | 9,870 | $ | (12,830 | ) | $ | 9,695 | |||||||||||
Gains (losses) included in earnings |
| | | 1,749 | (564 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Changes in fair value of investment
securities available for sale
included in other comprehensive income |
237 | 3,232 | (52 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
New instruments acquired |
| | 10,005 | 145 | (1,353 | ) | 520 | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization |
| | | | 431 | (608 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Changes in fair value of servicing assets |
| | | | | 356 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 16,380 | $ | 28,782 | $ | 9,953 | $ | 11,764 | $ | (14,316 | ) | $ | 9,963 | |||||||||||
55
Table of Contents
Total Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Quarter ended March 31, 2010) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative | Derivative | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Agency | asset (S&P | liability (S&P | Servicing | |||||||||||||||||||||
Level 3 Instruments Only | CDOs | CLOs | CMOs | Options) | Options) | assets | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 15,148 | $ | 23,235 | $ | 71,723 | $ | 6,464 | $ | (9,543 | ) | $ | 7,120 | |||||||||||
Gains (losses) included in earnings |
| | (632 | ) | 1,125 | (1,281 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Changes in fair value of investment
securities available for sale
included in other comprehensive income |
520 | 1,187 | 2,440 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
New instruments acquired |
| | | 327 | (342 | ) | 685 | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization |
| | (2,334 | ) | (41 | ) | 235 | (104 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Changes in fair value of servicing assets |
| | | | | (132 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 15,668 | $ | 24,422 | $ | 71,197 | $ | 7,875 | $ | (10,931 | ) | $ | 7,569 | |||||||||||
There were no transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
The table below presents a detail of investment securities available-for-sale classified as level 3
at March 31, 2011:
March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Fair | Weighted | Principal | ||||||||||||||||
Type | Cost | Losses | Value | Average Yield | Protection | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of Puerto Rico Government
and political subdivisions |
$ | 10,005 | $ | 52 | $ | 9,953 | 3.50 | % | ||||||||||||
Structured credit investments |
||||||||||||||||||||
CDO |
$ | 25,548 | $ | 9,168 | $ | 16,380 | 5.80 | % | 6.22 | % | ||||||||||
CLO |
15,000 | 3,239 | 11,761 | 2.44 | % | 7.60 | % | |||||||||||||
CLO |
11,977 | 2,549 | 9,428 | 1.89 | % | 26.18 | % | |||||||||||||
CLO |
9,200 | 1,607 | 7,593 | 2.18 | % | 20.64 | % | |||||||||||||
$ | 61,725 | $ | 16,563 | $ | 45,162 | 3.68 | % | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 71,730 | $ | 16,615 | $ | 55,115 | 3.67 | % | ||||||||||||
Additionally, the Group may be required to measure certain assets at fair value in periods
subsequent to initial recognition on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. The adjustments
to fair value usually result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting,
identification of impaired loans requiring specific reserves under ASC 310-10-35 or write-downs of
individual assets.
The following tables present financial and non-financial assets that were subject to a fair value
measurement on a nonrecurring basis during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and the year ended
December 31, 2010, and which were still included in the consolidated statements of financial
condition as such dates. The amounts disclosed represent the aggregate of the fair value
measurements of those assets as of the end of the reporting periods.
56
Table of Contents
Carrying value at | ||||||||
March 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Level 3 | Level 3 | |||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||
Impaired commercial loans |
$ | 27,671 | $ | 25,898 | ||||
Foreclosed real estate |
30,095 | 27,931 | ||||||
$ | 57,766 | $ | 53,829 | |||||
Impaired commercial loans relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The
impairment of commercial loans was measured based on the fair value of collateral, which is derived
from appraisals that take into consideration prices on observed transactions involving similar
assets in similar locations, in accordance with provisions of ASC 310-10-35. Foreclosed real estate
represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate (including those covered under FDIC shared-loss
agreements) that was measured at fair value less estimated cost to sell.
Impaired commercial loans, which are measured using the fair value of the collateral for collateral
dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $27.7 million and $25.9 million at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively, with a valuation allowance of $1.2 million and $823 thousand at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the FDIC-assisted acquisition as of April 30, 2010
were presented at their fair value, as discussed in Note 2.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The information about the estimated fair value of financial instruments required by GAAP is
presented hereunder. The aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent
managements estimate of the underlying value of the Group.
The estimated fair value is subjective in nature and involves uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions
could affect these fair value estimates. The fair value estimates do not take into
consideration the value of future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not
financial instruments. Other significant tangible and intangible assets that are not considered
financial instruments are the value of long-term customer relationships of the retail deposits, and
premises and equipment.
57
Table of Contents
The estimated fair value and carrying value of the Groups financial instruments at March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010 is as follows:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Fair | Carrying | Fair | Carrying | |||||||||||||
Value | Value | Value | Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 317,411 | $ | 317,411 | $ | 448,946 | $ | 448,946 | ||||||||
Trading securities |
1,444 | 1,444 | 1,330 | 1,330 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale |
3,587,930 | 3,587,930 | 3,700,064 | 3,700,064 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
855,816 | 875,494 | 675,721 | 689,917 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock |
22,496 | 22,496 | 22,496 | 22,496 | ||||||||||||
Total loans (including loans held-for-sale) |
||||||||||||||||
Non-covered loans |
1,175,294 | 1,145,441 | 1,150,945 | 1,153,643 | ||||||||||||
Covered loans |
553,363 | 643,392 | 600,421 | 670,018 | ||||||||||||
Investment in equity indexed options |
11,764 | 11,764 | 9,870 | 9,870 | ||||||||||||
Investment in swap options |
7,804 | 7,804 | 7,422 | 7,422 | ||||||||||||
FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset |
424,091 | 436,889 | 430,383 | 471,872 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
28,634 | 28,634 | 28,716 | 28,716 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
7,203 | 7,203 | 11,023 | 11,023 | ||||||||||||
Servicing assets |
9,963 | 9,963 | 9,695 | 9,695 | ||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
2,527,947 | 2,501,472 | 2,585,922 | 2,588,887 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
3,680,511 | 3,456,605 | 3,701,669 | 3,456,781 | ||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
300,825 | 281,687 | 303,868 | 281,753 | ||||||||||||
FDIC-guaranteed term notes |
107,889 | 105,112 | 106,428 | 105,834 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated capital notes |
36,083 | 36,083 | 36,083 | 36,083 | ||||||||||||
Short term borrowings |
32,335 | 32,335 | 42,470 | 42,470 | ||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
14,316 | 14,316 | 12,894 | 12,894 | ||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
47,933 | 47,933 | 43,798 | 43,798 |
58
Table of Contents
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of significant
financial instruments at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
| Cash and cash equivalents, money market investments, time deposits with other banks, securities sold but not yet delivered, accrued interest receivable and payable, securities and loans purchased but not yet received, federal funds purchased, accrued expenses and other liabilities have been valued at the carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated statements of financial condition as these are reasonable estimates of fair value given the short-term nature of the instruments. |
| Investments in FHLB stock are valued at their redemption value. |
| The fair value of investment securities is based on quoted market prices, when available, or market prices provided by recognized broker dealers. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon externally developed models that use both observable and unobservable inputs depending on the market activity of the instrument. The estimated fair value of the structured credit investments and the non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations are determined by using a third-party cash flow valuation model to calculate the present value of projected future cash flows. The assumptions used, which are highly uncertain and require a high degree of judgment, include primarily market discount rates, current spreads, duration, leverage, default, home price depreciation, and loss rates. The assumptions used are drawn from a wide array of data sources, including the performance of the collateral underlying each deal. The external-based valuation, which is obtained at least on a quarterly basis, is analyzed and its assumptions are evaluated and incorporated in either an internal-based valuation model when deemed necessary or compared to counterparties prices and agreed by management. |
| The FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset is measured separately from each of the covered asset categories as it is not contractually embedded in any of the covered asset categories. The $424.1 million fair value of the FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset represents the present value of the estimated cash payments (net of amount owed to the FDIC) expected to be received from the FDIC for future losses on covered assets based on the credit assumptions on estimated cash flows for each covered asset pool and the loss sharing percentages. The ultimate collectability of the FDIC shared-loss indemnification asset is dependent upon the performance of the underlying covered loans, the passage of time and claims paid by the FDIC which are impacted by the Banks adherence to certain guidelines established by the FDIC. |
| The fair values of the derivative instruments are provided by valuation experts and counterparties. Certain derivatives with limited market activity are valued using externally developed models that consider unobservable market parameters. The Group offers its customers certificates of deposit with an option tied to the performance of the S&P Index, and uses equity indexed option agreements with major broker-dealer companies to manage its exposure to changes in this index. Their fair value is obtained through the use of an external based valuation that was thoroughly evaluated and adopted by management as its measurement tool for these options. The payoff of these options is linked to the average value of the S&P Index on a specific set of dates during the life of the option. The methodology uses an average rate option or a cash-settled option whose payoff is based on the difference between the expected average value of the S&P Index during the remaining life of the option and the strike price at inception. The assumptions, which are uncertain and require a degree of judgment, include primarily S&P Index volatility, forward interest rate projections, estimated index dividend payout, and leverage. |
| Fair value of interest rate swaps and options on interest rate swaps is based on the net discounted value of the contractual projected cash flows of both the pay-fixed receive-variable legs of the contracts. The projected cash flows are based on the forward yield curve, and discounted using current estimated market rates. |
| The fair value of the covered and non-covered loan portfolio (including loans held-for-sale) is estimated by segregating by type, such as mortgage, commercial, consumer, and leasing. Each loan segment is further segmented into fixed and adjustable interest rates and by performing and non-performing categories. The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting contractual cash flows, adjusted for prepayment estimates (voluntary and involuntary), if any, using estimated current market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan. This fair value is not currently an indication of an exit price as that type of assumption could result in a different fair value estimate. |
| The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of the contractual cash flows, using estimated current market discount rates for deposits of similar remaining maturities. |
59
Table of Contents
| For short-term borrowings, the carrying amount is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value. The subordinated capital note has a par value of $36.1 million, bears interest based on 3-month LIBOR plus 295 basis points (3.26% at March 31, 2011; 3.25% at December 31, 2010), payable quarterly. The fair value of long-term borrowings is based on the discounted value of the contractual cash flows, using current estimated market discount rates for borrowings with similar terms and remaining maturities and put dates. |
| The fair value of commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit is based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties credit standings. |
| The fair value of servicing assets is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions. |
NOTE 15 SEGMENT REPORTING
The Group segregates its businesses into the following major reportable segments of business:
Banking, Wealth Management, and Treasury. Management established the reportable segments based on
the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources.
Other factors such as the Groups organization, nature of its products, distribution channels and
economic characteristics of the products were also considered in the determination of the
reportable segments. The Group measures the performance of these reportable segments based on
pre-established goals of different financial parameters such as net income, net interest income,
loan production, and fees generated. Non-interest expenses allocations among segments were reviewed
during the fourth quarter of 2010 to reallocate expenses from the Banking to the Wealth Management
and Treasury segments for a suitable presentation. The Groups methodology for allocating
non-interest expenses among segments is based on several factors such as revenues, employee
headcount, occupied space, dedicated services or time, among others. These factors are reviewed on
a periodical basis and may change if the conditions warrant.
Banking includes the Banks branches and mortgage banking, with traditional banking products such
as deposits and mortgage, commercial and consumer loans. Mortgage banking activities are carried
out by the Banks mortgage banking division, whose principal activity is to originate mortgage
loans for the Groups own portfolio. As part of its mortgage banking activities, the Group may sell
loans directly into the secondary market or securitize conforming loans into mortgage-backed
securities.
Wealth Management is comprised of the Banks trust division (Oriental Trust), the broker-dealer
subsidiary (Oriental Financial Services Corp.), the insurance agency subsidiary (Oriental
Insurance, Inc.), and the pension plan administration subsidiary (Caribbean Pension Consultants,
Inc.). The core operations of this segment are financial planning, money management and investment
banking, brokerage services, insurance sales activity, corporate and individual trust and
retirement services, as well as pension plan administration services.
The Treasury segment encompasses all of the Groups asset/liability management activities such as:
purchases and sales of investment securities, interest rate risk management, derivatives, and
borrowings. Intersegment sales and transfers, if any, are accounted for as if the sales or
transfers were to third parties, that is, at current market prices. The accounting policies of the
segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
included Groups annual report on Form 10-K.
60
Table of Contents
Following are the results of operations and the selected financial information by operating segment
as of and for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
Wealth | Total Major | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Banking | Management | Treasury | Segments | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 32,058 | $ | | $ | 45,852 | $ | 77,910 | $ | | $ | 77,910 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(9,378 | ) | | (31,367 | ) | (40,745 | ) | | (40,745 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
22,680 | | 14,485 | 37,165 | | 37,165 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for non-covered loan and lease losses |
(3,800 | ) | | | (3,800 | ) | | (3,800 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Provision for covered loan and lease losses |
(549 | ) | | | (549 | ) | | (549 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest income (loss) |
6,745 | 4,752 | (3,970 | ) | 7,527 | | 7,527 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
(24,241 | ) | (4,017 | ) | (2,532 | ) | (30,790 | ) | | (30,790 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
412 | | | 412 | (412 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment expenses |
| (288 | ) | (124 | ) | (412 | ) | 412 | | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 1,247 | $ | 447 | $ | 7,859 | $ | 9,553 | $ | | $ | 9,553 | ||||||||||||
Total assets as of March 31, 2011 |
$ | 3,207,253 | $ | 12,390 | $ | 4,673,186 | $ | 7,892,829 | $ | (716,700 | ) | $ | 7,176,129 | |||||||||||
Wealth | Total Major | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Banking | Management | Treasury | Segments | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 17,637 | $ | 4 | $ | 52,695 | $ | 70,336 | $ | | $ | 70,336 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(8,271 | ) | | (32,588 | ) | (40,859 | ) | | (40,859 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
9,366 | 4 | 20,107 | 29,477 | | 29,477 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for non-covered loan losses |
(4,014 | ) | | | (4,014 | ) | | (4,014 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest income |
2,483 | 4,803 | 752 | 8,038 | | 8,038 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
(13,193 | ) | (3,200 | ) | (4,000 | ) | (20,393 | ) | | (20,393 | ) | |||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
344 | 822 | | 1,166 | (1,166 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Intersegment expenses |
| (1,136 | ) | (30 | ) | (1,166 | ) | 1,166 | | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | (5,014 | ) | $ | 1,293 | $ | 16,829 | $ | 13,108 | $ | | $ | 13,108 | |||||||||||
Total assets as of March 31, 2010 |
$ | 1,967,184 | $ | 11,080 | $ | 5,005,051 | $ | 6,983,315 | $ | (474,795 | ) | $ | 6,508,520 | |||||||||||
61
Table of Contents
Item 2 | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
Quarter ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Variance % | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||
EARNINGS DATA: |
||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 77,910 | $ | 70,336 | 10.8 | % | ||||||
Interest expense |
40,745 | 40,859 | -0.3 | % | ||||||||
Net interest income |
37,165 | 29,477 | 26.1 | % | ||||||||
Provision for non-covered loan and lease losses |
3,800 | 4,014 | -5.3 | % | ||||||||
Provision for covered loan and lease losses, net |
549 | | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses |
32,816 | 25,463 | 28.9 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest income |
7,527 | 8,038 | -6.4 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest expenses |
30,790 | 20,393 | 51.0 | % | ||||||||
Income before taxes |
9,553 | 13,108 | -27.1 | % | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
6,472 | 1,172 | 452.2 | % | ||||||||
Net Income |
3,081 | 11,936 | -74.2 | % | ||||||||
Less: Dividends on preferred stock |
(1,201 | ) | (1,201 | ) | 0.0 | % | ||||||
Income available to common shareholders |
$ | 1,880 | $ | 10,735 | -82.5 | % | ||||||
PER SHARE DATA: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.42 | -90.2 | % | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.41 | -90.2 | % | ||||||
Average common shares outstanding and equivalents |
46,179 | 25,932 | 78.1 | % | ||||||||
Book value per common share |
$ | 14.22 | $ | 11.97 | 18.8 | % | ||||||
Tangible book value per common share |
$ | 14.11 | $ | 11.91 | 18.5 | % | ||||||
Market price at end of period |
$ | 12.55 | $ | 13.50 | -7.0 | % | ||||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.04 | 25.2 | % | ||||||
Cash dividends declared on common shares |
$ | 2,269 | $ | 1,322 | 71.7 | % | ||||||
PERFORMANCE RATIOS: |
||||||||||||
Return on average assets (ROA) |
0.17 | % | 0.73 | % | -76.8 | % | ||||||
Return on average common equity (ROE) |
1.15 | % | 13.39 | % | -91.4 | % | ||||||
Equity-to-assets ratio |
9.94 | % | 7.13 | % | 39.3 | % | ||||||
Efficiency ratio |
64.63 | % | 55.30 | % | 16.9 | % | ||||||
Expense ratio |
1.26 | % | 0.88 | % | 42.6 | % | ||||||
Interest rate spread |
2.31 | % | 1.96 | % | 17.9 | % | ||||||
Interest rate margin |
2.30 | % | 2.00 | % | 15.0 | % | ||||||
62
Table of Contents
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Variance % | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
PERIOD END BALANCES AND CAPITAL RATIOS: |
||||||||||||
Investments and loans |
||||||||||||
Investments securities |
$ | 4,487,514 | $ | 4,413,957 | 1.7 | % | ||||||
Non-covered loans |
1,142,540 | 1,151,838 | -0.8 | % | ||||||||
Covered loans |
589,912 | 620,732 | -5.0 | % | ||||||||
$ | 6,219,966 | $ | 6,186,527 | 0.5 | % | |||||||
Deposits and borrowings |
||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 2,501,472 | $ | 2,588,887 | -3.4 | % | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
3,456,605 | 3,456,781 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Other borrowings |
455,217 | 466,140 | -2.3 | % | ||||||||
$ | 6,413,294 | $ | 6,511,808 | -1.5 | % | |||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||||||
Preferred stock |
68,000 | 68,000 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Common stock |
47,808 | 47,808 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Treasury stock, at cost |
(28,746 | ) | (16,732 | ) | 71.8 | % | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
498,303 | 498,435 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Legal surplus |
46,717 | 46,331 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||
Retained earnings |
50,727 | 51,502 | -1.5 | % | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
30,319 | 36,987 | -18.0 | % | ||||||||
$ | 713,128 | $ | 732,331 | -2.6 | % | |||||||
Capital ratios |
||||||||||||
Leverage capital |
9.52 | % | 9.56 | % | -0.4 | % | ||||||
Tier 1 risk-based capital |
30.63 | % | 30.98 | % | -1.1 | % | ||||||
Total risk-based capital |
31.91 | % | 32.26 | % | -1.1 | % | ||||||
Financial assets managed |
||||||||||||
Trust assets managed |
$ | 2,245,158 | $ | 2,175,270 | 3.2 | % | ||||||
Broker-dealer assets gathered |
$ | 1,792,264 | $ | 1,695,634 | 5.7 | % | ||||||
63
Table of Contents
OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
Introduction
The Groups diversified mix of businesses and products generates both the interest income
traditionally associated with a banking institution and non-interest income traditionally
associated with a financial services institution (generated by such businesses as securities
brokerage, fiduciary services, investment banking, insurance and retirement plan administration).
Although all of these businesses, to varying degrees, are affected by interest rate and financial
market fluctuations and other external factors, the Groups commitment is to continue producing a
balanced and growing revenue stream.
From time to time, the Group uses certain non-GAAP measures of financial performance to supplement
the financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP. The Group presents non-GAAP measures
when its management believes that the additional information is useful and meaningful to investors.
Non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning and are therefore unlikely to be comparable
to similar measures presented by other companies. The presentation of non-GAAP measures is not
intended to be a substitute for, and should not be considered in isolation from, the financial
measures reported in accordance with GAAP. The Groups management has reported and discussed the
results of operations herein both on a GAAP basis and on a pre-tax operating income basis (defined
as net interest income, less provision for non-covered loan and lease losses, plus banking and
wealth management revenues, less non-interest expenses, and calculated on the accompanying table).
The Groups management believes that, given the nature of the items excluded from the definition of
pre-tax operating income, it is useful to state what the results of operations would have been
without them so that investors can see the financial trends from the Groups continuing business.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Groups income available to common shareholders totaled
$1.9 million, or $0.04 per basic and diluted earnings per common share. This compares to $10.7
million in income available to common shareholders, or $0.42 and $0.41 per basic and diluted
earnings per common share, respectively, for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Highlights
| Pre-tax operating income of $13.1 million increased 4.7% from the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and more than doubled from the quarter ended December 31, 2010. |
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||||||||||
PRE-TAX OPERATING INCOME |
||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 37,165 | $ | 29,477 | $ | 30,602 | ||||||
Less provision for non-covered loan and lease losses |
(3,800 | ) | (4,014 | ) | (3,700 | ) | ||||||
Core non-interest income: |
||||||||||||
Wealth management revenues |
4,682 | 3,978 | 4,717 | |||||||||
Banking service revenues |
3,835 | 1,622 | 3,805 | |||||||||
Mortgage banking activities |
1,959 | 1,797 | 1,999 | |||||||||
Total core non-interest income |
10,476 | 7,397 | 10,521 | |||||||||
Less non interest expenses |
(30,790 | ) | (20,393 | ) | (31,649 | ) | ||||||
Total Pre-tax operating income |
$ | 13,051 | $ | 12,467 | $ | 5,774 | ||||||
| Income available to common shareholders was $1.9 million, or $0.04 per share. This compares to $10.7 million, or $0.41 per share, in the year ago quarter, and $3.9 million, or $0.08 per share, in the preceding quarter. These reductions were primarily due to the re-measurement of a $5.4 million portion of the deferred tax asset, due to a reduction in the applicable tax rate, and a $4.0 million loss on the strategic sale of forward-settlement interest rate swaps. |
| Wealth Management revenues increased 17.7% year over year, reflecting growth in brokerage and trust, and a successful 2011 individual retirement accounts campaign. Assets under management grew 35.0% year over year, to $4.0 billion. |
64
Table of Contents
| Banking service revenues increased 136.4% year over year, reflecting the Groups expanded and more strategically located branch network. Retail deposits grew 36.7% year over year, to $2.0 billion, while cost of deposits declined to 1.91% from 2.71% in the quarter ended March 31, 2010. | ||
| Total loans increased 53.1% year over year to $1.7 billion, reflecting the addition of the former Eurobank loan and leasing portfolios, and increases in commercial loans and consumer loans of 13.5% and 69.0%, respectively. | ||
| Book value per share was $14.22 at March 31, 2011 compared to $11.97 at March 31, 2010 and $14.33 at December 31, 2010; total stockholders equity was $713.1 million (which reflects approximately $12.5 million in stock repurchases during the first quarter of 2011), compared to $464.2 million and $732.3 million, respectively; and tangible common equity to total assets was 8.92% compared to 6.06% and 9.02%, respectively. |
Other Highlights
| Net interest margin of 2.30% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 increased 41 basis points from the same period in 2010. Higher yield as a result of former Eurobank loans and lower cost of funds were able to offset the decline in yield from investments. | ||
| Non-interest expenses of $30.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 were $10.4 million higher than in the same period in 2010. This increase is mostly related to higher expenses as a result of the FDIC-assisted acquisition. | ||
| Net credit losses (excluding loans covered under shared-loss agreements with the FDIC) of $2.5 million increased $1.2 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 from the same period in 2010. Non-performing loans (NPLs) decreased 1.4% from December 31, 2010. The Groups NPLs generally reflect that the economic decline in Puerto Rico is leveling off. The Group does not expect NPLs to result in significantly higher losses as most loans are well-collateralized residential mortgages with adequate loan-to-value ratios. | ||
| Non-covered loans totaled $1.1 billion, reflecting increases in leases and consumer loans, which offset reduced residential mortgage loans and commercial loans due to maturities. Total loan production and purchases declined $23.5 million compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as the Groups enhanced commercial banking team made the strategic decision to focus on developing a larger and higher quality pipeline of new business, with the goal of increasing commercial loan production during the balance of 2011. | ||
| Core retail deposits increased 0.4% to $2.0 billion, while the Group strategically reduced institutional and brokered deposits by $95.4 million. Total borrowings declined 0.3% due to a reduction of short-term borrowings. | ||
| Investment securities of $4.5 billion increased 1.7% or $73.6 million. This reflects a reduction of 3.0% or $112.1 million in the available-for-sale portfolio, due to the maturity of FNMA and FHLMC certificates, and an increase of 26.9%, or $185.6 million in the held-to-maturity portfolio. | ||
| Approximately 98% of the Groups investment portfolio consists of agency mortgage-backed securities guaranteed or issued by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA. |
Share Count
| Common shares outstanding totaled 45.4 million at March 31, 2011 compared to 33.1 million a year ago. The increase reflects a capital raises in the March and June 2010 quarters related to the FDIC-assisted acquisition of Eurobank, less repurchases during the March 2011 quarter. |
| During the March 2011 quarter, Oriental returned approximately $12.5 million of its current $30 million share repurchase program, buying back 1.029 million shares, at an average cost of $12.18 per share. Subsequently, the Group returned approximately $1.3 million, buying back 103 thousand shares, for a total of $13.8 million at the date of this report, buying back 1.132 million shares, at an average cost of $12.21 per share. |
65
Table of Contents
Capital
| The Group continues to maintain regulatory capital ratios well above the requirements for a well-capitalized institution. At March 31, 2011, the Leverage Capital Ratio was 9.52%, Tier-1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio was 30.29%, and Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio was 31.57%. In addition, Tangible Common Equity to risk-weighted assets was 28.26%. |
Non-Operating Items
These included the following major items:
| Loss of $4.0 million on derivative activities for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. These losses were mainly due to realized losses of $4.3 million due to the terminations of forward-settlement swaps with a notional amount of $1.25 billion. These terminations allowed the Group to enter into new forward-settlement swap contracts with a notional amount of $950 million. The new swaps will reduce the cost of $600 million of wholesale borrowings to 1.66% from 4.23%, starting December 28, 2011, and will also lower the cost of $350 million of wholesale borrowings to 1.77% from 4.26%, starting May 9, 2012. The Group is applying cash flow hedge accounting on the new swaps; any future fluctuations in value will be recorded through other comprehensive income to the extent there is no significant ineffectiveness in the cash flow hedges. |
| Accretion of $1.2 million of the FDIC loss-share indemnification asset related to the former Eurobank loan portfolio. The estimated fair value of this asset was determined by discounting the projected cash flows related to the shared-loss agreements based on expected reimbursements, primarily for credit losses on covered assets. The time value of money incorporated into the present value computation is accreted over the shorter of the shared-loss agreements terms or the holding period of the covered assets. |
66
Table of Contents
TABLE 1 QUARTERLY ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME AND CHANGES DUE TO VOLUME/RATE
FOR THE QUARTERS PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
FOR THE QUARTERS PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest | Average rate | Average balance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
March | March | March | March | March | March | |||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
A TAX EQUIVALENT SPREAD |