Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
10-K - FORM 10-K - PETROQUEST ENERGY INC | c13233e10vk.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - PETROQUEST ENERGY INC | c13233exv31w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - PETROQUEST ENERGY INC | c13233exv31w2.htm |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - PETROQUEST ENERGY INC | c13233exv32w1.htm |
EX-23.2 - EXHIBIT 23.2 - PETROQUEST ENERGY INC | c13233exv23w2.htm |
EX-21.1 - EXHIBIT 21.1 - PETROQUEST ENERGY INC | c13233exv21w1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - PETROQUEST ENERGY INC | c13233exv32w2.htm |
EX-23.1 - EXHIBIT 23.1 - PETROQUEST ENERGY INC | c13233exv23w1.htm |
Exhibit 99.1
PETROQUEST ENERGY, INC.
Estimated
Future Reserves and Income
Attributable to Certain
Leasehold and Royalty Interests
(SEC Parameters)
As of
December 31, 2010
/s/ James F. Latham | ||||
James F. Latham, P.E. | ||||
TBPE License No. 49586 Senior Vice President |
[SEAL]
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580
TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580 | FAX (713) 651-0849 | |||||
1100 LOUISIANA
|
SUITE 3800 | HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5235 | TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191 |
February 21, 2011
PetroQuest Energy, Inc.
400 East Kaliste Saloom Rd, Suite 6000
Lafayette, Louisiana 70508
400 East Kaliste Saloom Rd, Suite 6000
Lafayette, Louisiana 70508
Gentlemen:
At your request, Ryder Scott Company (Ryder Scott) has prepared an estimate of the proved
reserves, future production, and income attributable to certain leasehold and royalty interests of
PetroQuest Energy, Inc. (PetroQuest) as of December 31, 2010. The subject properties are located
in the states of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas and Wyoming and in the federal waters
offshore Louisiana and Texas. The reserves and income data were estimated based on the definitions
and disclosure guidelines of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) contained
in Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, Final Rule
released January 14, 2009, in the Federal Register (SEC regulations). Our third party study,
completed on January 13, 2011, and presented herein, was prepared for public disclosure by
PetroQuest in filings made with the SEC in accordance with the disclosure requirements set forth in
the SEC regulations.
The properties evaluated by Ryder Scott represent 100 percent of the total net proved liquid
hydrocarbon reserves and 100 percent of the total net proved gas reserves of PetroQuest as of
December 31, 2010.
The estimated reserves and future net income amounts presented in this report, as of December
31, 2010, are related to hydrocarbon prices. The hydrocarbon prices used in the preparation of
this report are based on the average prices during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of
the period covered in this report, determined as the unweighted arithmetic averages of the prices
in effect on the first-day-of-the-month for each month within such period, unless prices were
defined by contractual arrangements, as required by the SEC regulations. Actual future prices may
vary significantly from the prices required by SEC regulations; therefore, volumes of reserves
actually recovered and the amounts of income actually received may differ significantly from the
estimated quantities presented in this report. The results of this study are summarized below.
600, 1015 4TH STREET, S.W.CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4
|
TEL (403) 262-2799 | FAX (403) 262-2790 | ||
621 17TH STREET, SUITE 1550 DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501
|
TEL (303) 623-9147 | FAX (303) 623-4258 |
PetroQuest Energy, Inc.
February 21, 2011
Page 2
February 21, 2011
Page 2
SEC PARAMETERS
Estimated Net Reserves and Income Data
Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests of
PetroQuest Energy, Inc.
As of December 31, 2010
Estimated Net Reserves and Income Data
Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests of
PetroQuest Energy, Inc.
As of December 31, 2010
Proved | ||||||||||||||||
Developed | Total | |||||||||||||||
Producing | Non-Producing | Undeveloped | Proved | |||||||||||||
Net Remaining Reserves |
||||||||||||||||
Oil/Condensate Barrels |
740,537 | 732,977 | 149,329 | 1,622,843 | ||||||||||||
Plant Products Barrels |
873,433 | 140,233 | 382,033 | 1,395,699 | ||||||||||||
Gas MMCF |
104,267 | 6,332 | 63,967 | 174,566 | ||||||||||||
Income Data |
||||||||||||||||
Future Gross Revenue |
$ | 443,911,646 | $ | 90,297,975 | $ | 238,373,708 | $ | 772,583,329 | ||||||||
Deductions |
126,773,385 | 47,397,119 | 155,908,256 | 330,078,760 | ||||||||||||
Future Net Income (FNI) |
$ | 317,138,261 | $ | 42,900,856 | $ | 82,465,452 | $ | 442,504,569 | ||||||||
Discounted FNI @ 10% |
$ | 203,419,381 | $ | 35,912,447 | $ | 16,319,129 | $ | 255,650,957 |
Liquid hydrocarbons are expressed in standard 42 gallon barrels. All gas volumes are reported
on an as sold basis expressed in millions of cubic feet (MMCF) at the official temperature and
pressure bases of the areas in which the gas reserves are located.
The future gross revenue is after the deduction of production taxes. The deductions
incorporate the normal direct costs of operating the wells, ad valorem taxes, recompletion costs,
development costs, and certain abandonment costs net of salvage. The future net income is before
the deduction of state and federal income taxes and general administrative overhead, and has not
been adjusted for outstanding loans that may exist, nor does it include any adjustment for cash on
hand or undistributed income. Gas reserves account for approximately 77 percent and liquid
hydrocarbon reserves account for the remaining 23 percent of total future gross revenue from proved
reserves.
The discounted future net income shown above was calculated using a discount rate of 10
percent per annum compounded monthly. Future net income was discounted at four other discount
rates which were also compounded monthly. These results are shown in summary form as follows.
Discounted Future Net Income | ||||
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||
Discount Rate | Total | |||
Percent | Proved | |||
5 |
$ | 321,215,768 | ||
15 |
$ | 213,994,164 | ||
20 |
$ | 184,675,940 | ||
30 |
$ | 145,336,890 |
The results shown above are presented for your information and should not be construed as our
estimate of fair market value.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PetroQuest Energy, Inc.
February 21, 2011
Page 3
February 21, 2011
Page 3
Reserves Included in This Report
The proved reserves included herein conform to the definition as set forth in the Securities
and Exchange Commissions Regulations Part 210.4-10(a). An abridged version of the SEC reserves
definitions from 210.4-10(a) entitled Petroleum Reserves Definitions is included as an attachment
to this report.
The various proved reserve status categories are defined under the attachment entitled
Petroleum Reserves Definitions in this report. The proved developed non-producing reserves
included herein consist of the shut-in and behind pipe categories.
No attempt was made to quantify or otherwise account for any accumulated gas production
imbalances that may exist. The proved gas volumes included herein do not attribute gas consumed in
operations as reserves.
Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated
to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known
accumulations. All reserve estimates involve an assessment of the uncertainty relating the
likelihood that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the
estimated quantities determined as of the date the estimate is made. The uncertainty depends
chiefly on the amount of reliable geologic and engineering data available at the time of the
estimate and the interpretation of these data. The relative degree of uncertainty may be conveyed
by placing reserves into one of two principal classifications, either proved or unproved. Unproved
reserves are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves, and may be further sub-classified
as probable and possible reserves to denote progressively increasing uncertainty in their
recoverability. At PetroQuests request, this report addresses only the proved reserves
attributable to the properties evaluated herein.
Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas which, by analysis of
geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically
producible from a given date forward. The proved reserves included herein were estimated using
deterministic methods. If deterministic methods are used, the SEC has defined reasonable certainty
for proved reserves as a high degree of confidence that the quantities will be recovered.
Proved reserve estimates will generally be revised only as additional geologic or engineering
data become available or as economic conditions change. For proved reserves, the SEC states that
as changes due to increased availability of geoscience (geological, geophysical, and geochemical),
engineering, and economic data are made to the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) with time,
reasonably certain EUR is much more likely to increase or remain constant than to decrease.
Moreover, estimates of proved reserves may be revised as a result of future operations, effects of
regulation by governmental agencies or geopolitical or economic risks. Therefore, the proved
reserves included in this report are estimates only and should not be construed as being exact
quantities, and if recovered, the revenues therefrom, and the actual costs related thereto, could
be more or less than the estimated amounts.
PetroQuests operations may be subject to various levels of governmental controls and
regulations. These controls and regulations may include, but may not be limited to, matters
relating to land tenure and leasing, the legal rights to produce hydrocarbons, drilling and
production practices, environmental protection, marketing and pricing policies, royalties, various
taxes and levies including income tax and are subject to change from time to time. Such changes in
governmental regulations and policies may cause volumes of proved reserves actually recovered and
amounts of proved income actually received to differ significantly from the estimated quantities.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PetroQuest Energy, Inc.
February 21, 2011
Page 4
February 21, 2011
Page 4
The estimates of proved reserves presented herein were based upon a detailed study of the
properties in which PetroQuest owns an interest; however, we have not made any field examination of
the properties. No consideration was given in this report to potential environmental liabilities
that may exist nor were any costs included for potential liabilities to restore and clean up
damages, if any, caused by past operating practices.
Estimates of Reserves
The estimation of reserves involves two distinct determinations. The first determination
results in the estimation of the quantities of recoverable oil and gas and the second determination
results in the estimation of the uncertainty associated with those estimated quantities in
accordance with the definitions set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulations
Part 210.4-10(a). The process of estimating the quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves
relies on the use of certain generally accepted analytical procedures. These analytical procedures
fall into three broad categories or methods: (1) performance-based methods; (2) volumetric-based
methods; and (3) analogy. These methods may be used singularly or in combination by the reserve
evaluator in the process of estimating the quantities of reserves. Reserve evaluators must select
the method or combination of methods which in their professional judgment is most appropriate given
the nature and amount of reliable geoscience and engineering data available at the time of the
estimate, the established or anticipated performance characteristics of the reservoir being
evaluated and the stage of development or producing maturity of the property.
In many cases, the analysis of the available geoscience and engineering data and the
subsequent interpretation of this data may indicate a range of possible outcomes in an estimate,
irrespective of the method selected by the evaluator. When a range in the quantity of reserves is
identified, the evaluator must determine the uncertainty associated with the incremental quantities
of the reserves. If the reserve quantities are estimated using the deterministic incremental
approach, the uncertainty for each discrete incremental quantity of the reserves is addressed by
the reserve category assigned by the evaluator. Therefore, it is the categorization of reserve
quantities as proved, probable and/or possible that addresses the inherent uncertainty in the
estimated quantities reported. For proved reserves, uncertainty is defined by the SEC as
reasonable certainty wherein the quantities actually recovered are much more likely than not to be
achieved. The SEC states that probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less
certain to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with proved reserves, are as
likely as not to be recovered. The SEC states that possible reserves are those additional
reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves and the total quantities
ultimately recovered from a project have a low probability of exceeding proved plus probable plus
possible reserves. All quantities of reserves within the same reserve category must meet the SEC
definitions as noted above.
Estimates of reserves quantities and their associated reserve categories may be revised in the
future as additional geoscience or engineering data become available. Furthermore, estimates of
reserves quantities and their associated reserve categories may also be revised due to other
factors such as changes in economic conditions, results of future operations, effects of regulation
by governmental agencies or geopolitical or economic risks as previously noted herein.
The proved reserves for the properties included herein were estimated by performance methods,
the volumetric method, analogy, or a combination of methods. Approximately 97 percent of the
proved producing reserves attributable to producing wells and/or reservoirs were estimated by
performance methods or a combination of methods. These performance methods include, but may not be
limited to, decline curve analysis or material balance methods which utilized extrapolations of
historical production and pressure data available through December, 2010 in those cases where
such data were considered to be definitive. The data utilized in this analysis were furnished to
Ryder Scott by PetroQuest or obtained from public data sources and were considered sufficient for
the purpose thereof. The remaining 3 percent of the proved producing reserves were estimated by
the volumetric method or analogy. These methods were used where there were inadequate historical
performance data to establish a definitive trend and where the use of production performance data
as a basis for the reserve estimates was considered to be inappropriate.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PetroQuest Energy, Inc.
February 21, 2011
Page 5
February 21, 2011
Page 5
Approximately 99 percent of the proved developed non-producing and undeveloped reserves
included herein were estimated by the volumetric method or analogy. The volumetric analysis
utilized pertinent well and seismic data furnished to Ryder Scott by PetroQuest or which we have
obtained from public data sources that were available through December, 2010. The data utilized
from the analogues as well as well and seismic data incorporated into our volumetric analysis were
considered sufficient for the purpose thereof.
To estimate economically recoverable proved oil and gas reserves and related future net cash
flows, we consider many factors and assumptions including, but not limited to, the use of reservoir
parameters derived from geological, geophysical and engineering data that cannot be measured
directly, economic criteria based on current costs and SEC pricing requirements, and forecasts of
future production rates. Under the SEC regulations 210.4-10(a)(22)(v) and (26), proved reserves
must be anticipated to be economically producible from a given date forward based on existing
economic conditions including the prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir
is to be determined. While it may reasonably be anticipated that the future prices received for
the sale of production and the operating costs and other costs relating to such production may
increase or decrease from those under existing economic conditions, such changes were, in
accordance with rules adopted by the SEC, omitted from consideration in making this evaluation.
PetroQuest has informed us that they have furnished us all of the material accounts, records,
geological and engineering data, and reports and other data required for this investigation. In
preparing our forecast of future proved production and income, we have relied upon data furnished
by PetroQuest with respect to property interests owned, production and well tests from examined
wells, normal direct costs of operating the wells or leases, other costs such as transportation
and/or processing fees, ad valorem and production taxes, recompletion and development costs,
abandonment costs after salvage, product prices based on the SEC regulations, adjustments or
differentials to product prices, geological structural and isochore maps, well logs, core analyses,
and pressure measurements. Ryder Scott reviewed such factual data for its reasonableness; however,
we have not conducted an independent verification of the data furnished by PetroQuest. We consider
the factual data used in this report appropriate and sufficient for the purpose of preparing the
estimates of reserves and future net revenues herein.
In summary, we consider the assumptions, data, methods and analytical procedures used in this
report appropriate for the purpose hereof, and we have used all such methods and procedures that we
consider necessary and appropriate to prepare the estimates of reserves herein. The proved
reserves included herein were determined in conformance with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule, including all
references to Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K, referred to herein collectively as the SEC
Regulations. In our opinion, the proved reserves presented in this report comply with the
definitions, guidelines and disclosure requirements as required by the SEC regulations.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PetroQuest Energy, Inc.
February 21, 2011
Page 6
February 21, 2011
Page 6
Future Production Rates
For wells currently on production, our forecasts of future production rates are based on
historical performance data. If no production decline trend has been established, future
production rates were held constant, or adjusted for the effects of curtailment where appropriate,
until a decline in ability to produce was anticipated. An estimated rate of decline was then
applied to depletion of the reserves. If a decline trend has been established, this trend was used
as the basis for estimating future production rates.
Test data and other related information were used to estimate the anticipated initial
production rates for those wells or locations that are not currently producing. For reserves not
yet on production, sales were estimated to commence at an anticipated date furnished by PetroQuest.
Wells or locations that are not currently producing may start producing earlier or later than
anticipated in our estimates due to unforeseen factors causing a change in the timing to initiate
production. Such factors may include delays due to weather, the availability of rigs, the sequence
of drilling, completing and/or recompleting wells and/or constraints set by regulatory bodies.
The future production rates from wells currently on production or wells or locations that are
not currently producing may be more or less than estimated because of changes including, but not
limited to, reservoir performance, operating conditions related to surface facilities, compression
and artificial lift, pipeline capacity and/or operating conditions, producing market demand and/or
allowables or other constraints set by regulatory bodies.
Hydrocarbon Prices
The hydrocarbon prices used herein are based on SEC price parameters using the average prices
during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered in this report,
determined as the unweighted arithmetic averages of the prices in effect on the
first-day-of-the-month for each month within such period, unless prices were defined by contractual
arrangements. For hydrocarbon products sold under contract, the contract prices, including fixed
and determinable escalations, exclusive of inflation adjustments, were used until expiration of the
contract. Upon contract expiration, the prices were adjusted to the 12-month unweighted arithmetic
average as previously described.
PetroQuest furnished us with the above mentioned average prices in effect on December 31,
2010. These initial SEC hydrocarbon prices were determined using the 12-month average
first-day-of-the-month benchmark prices appropriate to the geographic area where the hydrocarbons
are sold. These benchmark prices are prior to the adjustments for differentials as described
herein. The table below summarizes the benchmark prices and price reference used for the
geographic area(s) included in the report. In certain geographic areas, the price reference and
benchmark prices may be defined by contractual arrangements.
The product prices that were actually used to determine the future gross revenue for each
property reflect adjustments to the benchmark prices for gravity, quality, local conditions,
gathering and transportation fees and/or distance from market, referred to herein as
differentials. The differentials used in the preparation of this report were furnished to us by
PetroQuest. The differentials furnished to us were accepted as factual data and reviewed by us for
their reasonableness; however, we have not conducted an independent verification of the data used
by PetroQuest to determine these differentials.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PetroQuest Energy, Inc.
February 21, 2011
Page 7
February 21, 2011
Page 7
In addition, the table below summarizes the net volume weighted benchmark prices adjusted for
differentials and referred to herein as the average realized prices. The average realized prices
shown in the table below were determined from the total future gross revenue before production
taxes and the total net reserves for the geographic area and presented in accordance with SEC
disclosure requirements for each of the geographic areas included in the report.
Average | Average | |||||||||||
Price | Benchmark | Realized | ||||||||||
Geographic Area | Product | Reference | Prices | Prices | ||||||||
United States |
Oil/Condensate | WTI Cushing | $79.43/Bbl | $79.72/Bbl | ||||||||
NGLs | WTI Cushing | $79.43/Bbl | $42.01/Bbl | |||||||||
Gas | Henry Hub | $4.38/MMBTU | $3.56/MCF |
The effects of derivative instruments designated as price hedges of oil and gas quantities are
not reflected in our individual property evaluations.
Costs
Operating costs for the leases and wells in this report were furnished to us by PetroQuest,
and were accepted as factual data and reviewed by us for their reasonableness; however, we have not
conducted an independent verification of the operating cost data used by PetroQuest. The operating
costs include a portion of general and administrative costs allocated directly to the leases and
wells. For operated properties, the operating costs may include an appropriate level of corporate
general administrative and overhead costs. The operating costs for non-operated properties include
the COPAS overhead costs that are allocated directly to the leases and wells under terms of
operating agreements. No deduction was made for loan repayments, interest expenses, or exploration
and development prepayments that were not charged directly to the leases or wells.
Development costs were furnished to us by PetroQuest and are based on authorizations for
expenditure for the proposed work or actual costs for similar projects. The estimated net cost of
abandonment after salvage was included for properties where abandonment costs net of salvage were
significant. The estimates of the net abandonment costs furnished by PetroQuest were accepted
without independent verification.
The proved developed non-producing and undeveloped reserves in this report have been
incorporated herein in accordance with PetroQuests plans to develop these reserves as of December
31, 2010. The implementation of PetroQuests development plans as presented to us and incorporated
herein is subject to the approval process adopted by PetroQuests management. As the result of our
inquiries during the course of preparing this report, PetroQuest has informed us that the
development activities included herein have been subjected to and received the internal approvals
required by PetroQuests management at the appropriate local, regional and/or corporate level. In
addition to the internal approvals as noted, certain development activities may still be subject to
specific partner AFE processes, Joint Operating Agreement (JOA) requirements or other
administrative approvals external to PetroQuest. PetroQuest has provided written documentation
supporting their commitment to proceed with the development activities as presented to us.
Additionally, PetroQuest has informed us that they are not aware of any legal, regulatory,
political or economic obstacles that would significantly alter their plans.
Current costs used by PetroQuest were held constant throughout the life of the properties.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PetroQuest Energy, Inc.
February 21, 2011
Page 8
February 21, 2011
Page 8
Standards of Independence and Professional Qualification
Ryder Scott is an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm that has been providing
petroleum consulting services throughout the world for over seventy years. Ryder Scott is
employee-owned and maintains offices in Houston, Texas; Denver, Colorado; and Calgary, Alberta,
Canada. We have over eighty engineers and geoscientists on our permanent staff. By virtue of the
size of our firm and the large number of clients for which we provide services, no single client or
job represents a material portion of our annual revenue. We do not serve as officers or directors
of any publicly-traded oil and gas company and are separate and independent from the operating and
investment decision-making process of our clients. This allows us to bring the highest level of
independence and objectivity to each engagement for our services.
Ryder Scott actively participates in industry-related professional societies and organizes an
annual public forum focused on the subject of reserves evaluations and SEC regulations. Many of
our staff have authored or co-authored technical papers on the subject of reserves related topics.
We encourage our staff to maintain and enhance their professional skills by actively participating
in ongoing continuing education.
Prior to becoming an officer of the Company, Ryder Scott requires that staff engineers and
geoscientists have received professional accreditation in the form of a registered or certified
professional engineers license or a registered or certified professional geoscientists license,
or the equivalent thereof, from an appropriate governmental authority or a recognized
self-regulating professional organization.
We are independent petroleum engineers with respect to PetroQuest. Neither we nor any of our
employees have any interest in the subject properties and neither the employment to do this work
nor the compensation is contingent on our estimates of reserves for the properties which were
reviewed.
The results of this study, presented herein, are based on technical analysis conducted by
teams of geoscientists and engineers from Ryder Scott. The professional qualifications of the
undersigned, the technical person primarily responsible for overseeing, reviewing and approving the
evaluation of the reserves information discussed in this report, are included as an attachment to
this letter.
Terms of Usage
The results of our third party study, presented in report form herein, were prepared in
accordance with the disclosure requirements set forth in the SEC regulations and intended for
public disclosure as an exhibit in filings made with the SEC by PetroQuest.
For filings made with the SEC under the 1933 Securities Act, we have provided our written
consent for the references to our name as well as to the references to our third party report in
the registration statement(s) on Form S-3 by PetroQuest. Our consent for such use is included as a
separate exhibit to the filings made with the SEC by PetroQuest.
PetroQuest makes periodic filings on Form 10-K or 8-K with the SEC under the 1934 Exchange
Act. Furthermore, PetroQuest has certain registration statements filed with the SEC under the 1933
Securities Act into which any subsequently filed Form 10-K is incorporated by reference. We have
consented to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 of
PetroQuest of the references to our name as well as to the references to our third party report for
PetroQuest, which
appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of PetroQuest. Our written
consent for such use is included as a separate exhibit to the filings made with the SEC by
PetroQuest.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PetroQuest Energy, Inc.
February 21, 2011
Page 9
February 21, 2011
Page 9
We have provided PetroQuest with a digital version of the original signed copy of this report
letter. In the event there are any differences between the digital version included in filings
made by PetroQuest and the original signed report letter, the original signed report letter shall
control and supersede the digital version.
The data and work papers used in the preparation of this report are available for examination
by authorized parties in our offices. Please contact us if we can be of further service.
Very truly yours, | ||||
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P. | ||||
TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580 | ||||
/s/ James F. Latham | ||||
James F. Latham, P.E. | ||||
TBPE License No. 49586 | ||||
Senior Vice President | [SEAL] |
JFL/sm
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
Professional Qualifications of Primary Technical Person
The conclusions presented in this report are the result of technical analysis conducted by teams of
geoscientists and engineers from Ryder Scott Company, L.P. James F. Latham was the primary
technical person responsible for overseeing the estimate of the reserves, future production and
income.
Latham, an employee of Ryder Scott Company L.P. (Ryder Scott) since 1980, is a Senior Vice
President responsible for coordinating and supervising staff and consulting engineers of the
company in ongoing reservoir evaluation studies worldwide. Before joining Ryder Scott, Latham
served in a number of engineering positions with Exxon Company USA (now ExxonMobil). For more
information regarding Mr. Lathams geographic and job specific experience, please refer to the
Ryder Scott Company website at www.ryderscott.com/Experience/Employees.
Latham earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Louisiana Tech University
in 1974 and a Master of Science degree in Engineering from Louisiana Tech in 1975. Latham is a
licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Texas (1981) and is also a member of the Society of
Petroleum Evaluation Engineers and the Society of Petroleum Engineers.
The Texas Board of Professional Engineers requires a minimum of fifteen hours of continuing
education annually, including at least one hour in the area of professional ethics, which Latham
fulfills. As part of his 2010 continuing education hours, Latham attended an internally presented
3 hours of formalized training as well as a day long public forum, the 2010 RSC Reserves
Conference, relating to the definitions and disclosure guidelines contained in the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and
Gas Reporting, Final Rule released January 14, 2009 in the Federal Register. Latham attended an
additional 23 hours of formalized in-house training during 2010 covering such topics as the
SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE Petroleum Resources Management System, reservoir engineering, geoscience and
petroleum economics evaluation methods, procedures and software and ethics for consultants. Latham
has personally authored and conducts instruction regarding over 20 petroleum engineering software
programs, eleven of which comprise Ryder Scotts Reservoir Solutions Software for
Microsoft® Excel. Reservoir Solutions Software, published by Ryder Scott, is made
available without cost to energy industry professionals, and currently has in excess of 10,000
users located in more than 80 countries worldwide.
Based on his educational background, professional training and more than 32 years of practical
experience in the estimation and evaluation of petroleum reserves, Latham has attained the
professional qualifications as a Reserves Estimator and as a Reserves Auditor set forth in Article
III of the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves
Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers as of February 19, 2007.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS
As Adapted From:
RULE 4-10(a) of REGULATION S-X PART 210
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)
RULE 4-10(a) of REGULATION S-X PART 210
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)
PREAMBLE
On January 14, 2009, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published the
Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule in the Federal Register of National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA). The Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule
includes revisions and additions to the definition section in Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X,
revisions and additions to the oil and gas reporting requirements in Regulation S-K, and amends and
codifies Industry Guide 2 in Regulation S-K. The Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final
Rule, including all references to Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K, shall be referred to herein
collectively as the SEC regulations. The SEC regulations take effect for all filings made with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as of December 31, 2009, or after January 1,
2010. Reference should be made to the full text under Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations,
Regulation S-X Part 210, Rule 4-10(a) for the complete definitions (direct passages excerpted in
part or wholly from the aforementioned SEC document are denoted in italics herein).
Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated
to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known
accumulations. All reserve estimates involve an assessment of the uncertainty relating the
likelihood that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the
estimated quantities determined as of the date the estimate is made. The uncertainty depends
chiefly on the amount of reliable geologic and engineering data available at the time of the
estimate and the interpretation of these data. The relative degree of uncertainty may be conveyed
by placing reserves into one of two principal classifications, either proved or unproved. Unproved
reserves are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves and may be further sub-classified as
probable and possible reserves to denote progressively increasing uncertainty in their
recoverability. Under the SEC regulations as of December 31, 2009, or after January 1, 2010, a
company may optionally disclose estimated quantities of probable or possible oil and gas reserves
in documents publicly filed with the SEC. The SEC regulations continue to prohibit disclosure of
estimates of oil and gas resources other than reserves and any estimated values of such resources
in any document publicly filed with the SEC unless such information is required to be disclosed in
the document by foreign or state law as noted in §229.1202 Instruction to Item 1202.
Reserves estimates will generally be revised only as additional geologic or engineering data
become available or as economic conditions change.
Reserves may be attributed to either natural energy or improved recovery methods. Improved
recovery methods include all methods for supplementing natural energy or altering natural forces in
the reservoir to increase ultimate recovery. Examples of such methods are pressure maintenance,
natural gas cycling, waterflooding, thermal methods, chemical flooding, and the use of miscible and
immiscible displacement fluids. Other improved recovery methods may be developed in the future as
petroleum technology continues to evolve.
Reserves may be attributed to either conventional or unconventional petroleum accumulations.
Petroleum accumulations are considered as either conventional or unconventional based on the nature
of their in-place characteristics, extraction method applied, or degree of processing prior to
sale. Examples of unconventional petroleum accumulations include coalbed or coalseam methane
(CBM/CSM), basin-centered gas, shale gas, gas hydrates, natural bitumen and oil shale deposits.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS
Page 2
Page 2
These unconventional accumulations may require specialized extraction technology and/or
significant processing prior to sale.
Reserves do not include quantities of petroleum being held in inventory.
Because of the differences in uncertainty, caution should be exercised when aggregating
quantities of petroleum from different reserves categories.
RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)
Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(26) defines reserves as
follows:
Reserves. Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances
anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development
projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable
expectation that there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the
production, installed means of delivering oil and gas or related substances to market, and all
permits and financing required to implement the project.
Note to paragraph (a)(26): Reserves should not be assigned to adjacent reservoirs isolated
by major, potentially sealing, faults until those reservoirs are penetrated and evaluated as
economically producible. Reserves should not be assigned to areas that are clearly separated from
a known accumulation by a non-productive reservoir (i.e., absence of reservoir,
structurally low reservoir, or negative test results). Such areas may contain prospective
resources (i.e., potentially recoverable resources from undiscovered accumulations).
PROVED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)
Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(22) defines proved oil and gas
reserves as follows:
Proved oil and gas reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas,
which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty
to be economically produciblefrom a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing
economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulationsprior to the time at which
contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is
reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the
estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be
reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.
(i) The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes:
(A) The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and
(B) Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty,
be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas
on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS
Page 3
Page 3
PROVED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS) CONTINUED
(ii) In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited
by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience,
engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with
reasonable certainty.
(iii) Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO)
elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be
assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience,
engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with
reasonable certainty.
(iv) Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery
techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved
classification when:
(A) Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties
no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed
program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable
technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which
the project or program was based; and
(B) The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and
entities, including governmental entities.
(v) Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility
from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the
12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as
an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within
such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations
based upon future conditions.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
RESERVES STATUS DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES
As Adapted From:
RULE 4-10(a) of REGULATION S-X PART 210
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)
RULE 4-10(a) of REGULATION S-X PART 210
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)
and
PETROLEUM RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SPE-PRMS)
Sponsored and Approved by:
SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS (SPE)
WORLD PETROLEUM COUNCIL (WPC)
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS (AAPG)
SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM EVALUATION ENGINEERS (SPEE)
Reserves status categories define the development and producing status of wells and
reservoirs. Reference should be made to Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Regulation S-X Part
210, Rule 4-10(a) and the SPE-PRMS as the following reserves status definitions are based on
excerpts from the original documents (direct passages excerpted from the aforementioned SEC and
SPE-PRMS documents are denoted in italics herein).
DEVELOPED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)
Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(6) defines developed oil and
gas reserves as follows:
Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be
recovered:
(i) Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which
the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new
well; and
(ii) Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the
time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.
Developed Producing (SPE-PRMS Definitions)
While not a requirement for disclosure under the SEC regulations, developed oil and gas
reserves may be further sub-classified according to the guidance contained in the SPE-PRMS as
Producing or Non-Producing.
Developed Producing Reserves
Developed Producing Reserves are expected to be recovered from completion intervals that are open and producing at the time of the estimate.
Developed Producing Reserves are expected to be recovered from completion intervals that are open and producing at the time of the estimate.
Improved recovery reserves are considered producing only after the improved recovery project
is in operation.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS
RESERVES STATUS DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES
Page 2
Page 2
Developed Non-Producing
Developed Non-Producing Reserves include shut-in and behind-pipe reserves.
Developed Non-Producing Reserves include shut-in and behind-pipe reserves.
Shut-In
Shut-in Reserves are expected to be recovered from:
Shut-in Reserves are expected to be recovered from:
(1) | completion intervals which are open at the time of the estimate, but
which have not started producing; |
(2) | wells which were shut-in for market conditions or pipeline connections;
or |
(3) | wells not capable of production for mechanical reasons. |
Behind-Pipe
Behind-pipe Reserves are expected to be recovered from zones in existing wells, which will require additional completion work or future re-completion prior to start of production.
Behind-pipe Reserves are expected to be recovered from zones in existing wells, which will require additional completion work or future re-completion prior to start of production.
In all cases, production can be initiated or restored with relatively low expenditure
compared to the cost of drilling a new well.
UNDEVELOPED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)
Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(31) defines undeveloped oil and
gas reserves as follows:
Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be
recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively
major expenditure is required for recompletion.
(i) Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly
offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production
when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes
reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances.
(ii) Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a
development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled
within five years, unless the specific circumstances, justify a longer time.
(iii) Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable
to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery
technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by
actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or by other evidence using reliable technology
establishing reasonable certainty.
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS