Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - PETROQUEST ENERGY INC | c07805exv31w1.htm |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - PETROQUEST ENERGY INC | c07805exv32w1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - PETROQUEST ENERGY INC | c07805exv32w2.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - PETROQUEST ENERGY INC | c07805exv31w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2010
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from: to:
Commission file number: 001-32681
PETROQUEST ENERGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 72-1440714 | |
(State of Incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
400 E. Kaliste Saloom Rd., Suite 6000 | 70508 | |
Lafayette, Louisiana | (Zip code) | |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (337) 232-7028
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of November 1, 2010, there were 63,182,234 shares of the registrants common stock, par
value $.001 per share, outstanding.
PETROQUEST ENERGY, INC.
Table of Contents
Page No. | ||||||||
1 | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
12 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 |
Table of Contents
PETROQUEST ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Amounts in Thousands)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(unaudited) | (Note 1) | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 55,037 | $ | 20,772 | ||||
Revenue receivable |
9,650 | 16,457 | ||||||
Joint interest billing receivable |
12,176 | 11,792 | ||||||
Hedging asset |
6,187 | 2,796 | ||||||
Prepaid drilling costs |
2,113 | 2,383 | ||||||
Drilling pipe inventory |
16,063 | 19,297 | ||||||
Other current assets |
2,997 | 1,619 | ||||||
Total current assets |
104,223 | 75,116 | ||||||
Property and equipment: |
||||||||
Oil and gas properties: |
||||||||
Oil and gas properties, full cost method |
1,389,926 | 1,296,177 | ||||||
Unevaluated oil and gas properties |
58,069 | 108,079 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization |
(1,160,029 | ) | (1,082,381 | ) | ||||
Oil and gas properties, net |
287,966 | 321,875 | ||||||
Gas gathering assets |
4,177 | 4,848 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization of gas
gathering assets |
(1,422 | ) | (1,198 | ) | ||||
Total property and equipment |
290,721 | 325,525 | ||||||
Long-term receivable |
19,043 | 5,731 | ||||||
Other assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization
of $9,870 and $8,342, respectively |
6,076 | 4,087 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 420,063 | $ | 410,459 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable to vendors |
$ | 24,850 | $ | 27,113 | ||||
Advances from co-owners |
1,500 | 3,662 | ||||||
Oil and gas revenue payable |
5,440 | 7,886 | ||||||
Accrued interest and preferred stock dividend |
2,953 | 3,133 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligation |
1,785 | 4,517 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
5,361 | 4,106 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
41,889 | 50,417 | ||||||
Bank debt |
| 29,000 | ||||||
10% Senior Notes |
150,000 | | ||||||
10 3/8% Senior Notes |
| 149,267 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligation |
18,014 | 19,399 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
394 | 271 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.001 par value; authorized 5,000
shares; issued and outstanding 1,495 shares |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized 150,000
shares; issued and outstanding 61,458 and 61,177
shares, respectively |
61 | 61 | ||||||
Paid-in capital |
265,621 | 259,981 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
3,885 | 1,768 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(59,802 | ) | (99,706 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
209,766 | 162,105 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 420,063 | $ | 410,459 | ||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
Table of Contents
PETROQUEST ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Oil and gas sales |
$ | 46,229 | $ | 50,182 | $ | 135,631 | $ | 164,792 | ||||||||
Gas gathering revenue |
56 | 72 | 186 | 172 | ||||||||||||
46,285 | 50,254 | 135,817 | 164,964 | |||||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Lease operating expenses |
9,742 | 9,665 | 28,457 | 29,171 | ||||||||||||
Production taxes |
361 | 176 | 3,308 | 3,196 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
14,739 | 17,936 | 43,467 | 68,129 | ||||||||||||
Ceiling test writedown |
| | | 103,582 | ||||||||||||
Gas gathering costs |
11 | 14 | 22 | 181 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
5,581 | 4,142 | 15,906 | 13,164 | ||||||||||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
424 | 580 | 1,300 | 1,704 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
3,147 | 3,531 | 7,336 | 10,095 | ||||||||||||
34,005 | 36,044 | 99,796 | 229,222 | |||||||||||||
Gain on legal settlement |
| | 12,400 | | ||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
(5,973 | ) | | (5,973 | ) | | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
| | | 485 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
218 | (594 | ) | 229 | (5,903 | ) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
6,525 | 13,616 | 42,677 | (69,676 | ) | |||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
299 | 7,876 | (1,081 | ) | (18,772 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
6,226 | 5,740 | 43,758 | (50,904 | ) | |||||||||||
Preferred stock dividend |
1,287 | 1,287 | 3,854 | 3,854 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | 4,939 | $ | 4,453 | $ | 39,904 | $ | (54,758 | ) | |||||||
Earnings per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.63 | $ | (1.03 | ) | |||||||
Diluted |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.63 | $ | (1.03 | ) | |||||||
Weighted average number of common shares: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
61,446 | 61,126 | 61,372 | 53,411 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
61,814 | 61,656 | 61,744 | 53,411 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Table of Contents
PETROQUEST ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(Amounts in Thousands)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 43,758 | $ | (50,904 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||
Deferred tax benefit |
(1,081 | ) | (18,772 | ) | ||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
43,467 | 68,129 | ||||||
Ceiling test writedown |
| 103,582 | ||||||
Non-cash gain on legal settlement |
(4,164 | ) | | |||||
Gain on sale of assets |
| (485 | ) | |||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
5,973 | | ||||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
1,300 | 1,704 | ||||||
Inventory impairment |
| 903 | ||||||
Share based compensation expense |
5,863 | 4,734 | ||||||
Amortization costs and other |
1,124 | 1,127 | ||||||
Payments to settle asset retirement obligations |
(5,672 | ) | (1,547 | ) | ||||
Changes in working capital accounts: |
||||||||
Revenue receivable |
6,807 | 9,146 | ||||||
Joint interest billing receivable |
(384 | ) | 13,431 | |||||
Prepaid drilling and pipe costs |
3,504 | 14,286 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(55 | ) | (55,701 | ) | ||||
Advances from co-owners |
(2,162 | ) | (1,100 | ) | ||||
Other |
(2,084 | ) | (1,894 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
96,194 | 86,639 | ||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities: |
||||||||
Investment in oil and gas properties |
(78,015 | ) | (37,759 | ) | ||||
Investment in gas gathering assets |
| (4 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of unevaluated properties |
22,473 | | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas properties |
35,000 | 4,852 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(20,542 | ) | (32,911 | ) | ||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities: |
||||||||
Net payments for share based compensation |
(223 | ) | (332 | ) | ||||
Deferred financing costs |
(8 | ) | (82 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from common stock offering |
| 37,778 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of 10% Sr. Notes |
150,000 | | ||||||
Costs to issue 10% Sr. Notes |
(4,117 | ) | | |||||
Redemption of 10 3/8% Sr. Notes |
(150,000 | ) | | |||||
Costs to redeem 10 3/8% Sr. Notes |
(4,187 | ) | | |||||
Payment of preferred stock dividend |
(3,852 | ) | (3,852 | ) | ||||
Repayment of bank borrowings |
(29,000 | ) | (30,000 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(41,387 | ) | 3,512 | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
34,265 | 57,240 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
20,772 | 23,964 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 55,037 | $ | 81,204 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 10,923 | $ | 12,045 | ||||
Income taxes |
$ | 192 | $ | 205 | ||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
PETROQUEST ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
(Amounts in Thousands)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,226 | $ | 5,740 | $ | 43,758 | $ | (50,904 | ) | |||||||
Change in fair value of derivative instruments,
accounted for as hedges, net of tax benefit
(expense)
of $109, $7,671, ($1,274) and $9,868, respectively |
(186 | ) | (12,950 | ) | 2,117 | (16,660 | ) | |||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 6,040 | $ | (7,210 | ) | $ | 45,875 | $ | (67,564 | ) | ||||||
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
PETROQUEST ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial information for the three and nine month periods ended September
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, have been prepared by the Company and were not audited by its
independent registered public accountants. In the opinion of management, all normal and recurring
adjustments have been made to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and
cash flows of the Company at September 30, 2010 and for all reported periods. Results of
operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating
results for the full year or any future periods.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements
at that date. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes thereto included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Unless the context otherwise indicates, any references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
to PetroQuest or the Company refer to PetroQuest Energy, Inc. (Delaware) and its wholly-owned
consolidated subsidiaries, PetroQuest Energy, L.L.C. (a single member Louisiana limited liability
company), PetroQuest Oil & Gas, L.L.C. (a single member Louisiana limited liability company), TDC
Energy LLC (a single member Louisiana limited liability company) and Pittrans, Inc. (an Oklahoma
corporation).
Note 2 Convertible Preferred Stock
The Company has 1,495,000 shares of 6.875% Series B cumulative convertible perpetual
preferred stock (the Series B Preferred Stock) outstanding.
The following is a summary of certain terms of the Series B Preferred Stock:
Dividends. The Series B Preferred Stock accumulates dividends at an annual rate of 6.875% for
each share of Series B Preferred Stock. Dividends are cumulative from the date of first issuance.
To the extent payment of dividends is not prohibited by the Companys debt agreements, assets are
legally available to pay dividends and the Companys board of directors or an authorized committee
of the board declares a dividend payable, the Company pays dividends in cash, every quarter.
Mandatory conversion. After October 20, 2010, the Company may, at its option, cause shares of
the Series B Preferred Stock to be automatically converted at the applicable conversion rate, but
only if the closing sale price of the Companys common stock for 20 trading days within a period of
30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day immediately preceding the date the Company
gives the conversion notice equals or exceeds 130% of the conversion price in effect on each such
trading day.
Conversion rights. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock may be converted at any time, at
the option of the holder, into 3.4433 shares of the Companys common stock (which is based on an
initial conversion price of approximately $14.52 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment)
plus cash in lieu of fractional shares, subject to the Companys right to settle all or a portion
of any such conversion in cash or shares of the Companys common stock. If the Company elects to
settle all or any portion of its conversion obligation in cash, the conversion value and the number
of shares of the Companys common stock it will deliver upon conversion (if any) will be based upon
a 20 trading day averaging period.
Upon any conversion, the holder will not receive any cash payment representing accumulated and
unpaid dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock, whether or not in arrears, except in limited
circumstances. The conversion rate is equal to $50 divided by the conversion price at the time.
The conversion price is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. The
conversion price on the conversion date and the number of shares of the Companys common stock, as
applicable, to be delivered upon conversion may be adjusted if certain events occur.
5
Table of Contents
Note 3 Earnings Per Share
A reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share computations (in
thousands, except per share amounts) is as follows:
Income | Shares | Per | ||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 | (Numerator) | (Denominator) | Share Amount | |||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 4,939 | 61,446 | |||||||||
Attributable to participating securities |
(137 | ) | | |||||||||
BASIC EPS |
$ | 4,802 | 61,446 | $ | 0.08 | |||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 4,939 | 61,446 | |||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||
Stock options |
| 368 | ||||||||||
Attributable to participating securities |
(136 | ) | | |||||||||
DILUTED EPS |
$ | 4,803 | 61,814 | $ | 0.08 | |||||||
Income | Shares | Per | ||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 | (Numerator) | (Denominator) | Share Amount | |||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 4,453 | 61,126 | |||||||||
Attributable to participating securities |
(86 | ) | | |||||||||
BASIC EPS |
$ | 4,367 | 61,126 | $ | 0.07 | |||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||
Stock options |
| 225 | ||||||||||
Restricted stock |
86 | 305 | ||||||||||
DILUTED EPS |
$ | 4,453 | 61,656 | $ | 0.07 | |||||||
Income | Shares | Per | ||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | (Numerator) | (Denominator) | Share Amount | |||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 39,904 | 61,372 | |||||||||
Attributable to participating securities |
(1,008 | ) | | |||||||||
BASIC EPS |
$ | 38,896 | 61,372 | $ | 0.63 | |||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 39,904 | 61,372 | |||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||
Stock options |
| 372 | ||||||||||
Attributable to participating securities |
(1,002 | ) | | |||||||||
DILUTED EPS |
$ | 38,902 | 61,744 | $ | 0.63 | |||||||
Loss | Shares | Per | ||||||||||
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | (Numerator) | (Denominator) | Share Amount | |||||||||
BASIC and DILUTED EPS |
||||||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (54,758 | ) | 53,411 | $ | (1.03 | ) | |||||
6
Table of Contents
Common shares issuable upon the assumed conversion of the Series B preferred stock totaling
5,148,000 shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three
and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and the three month period ended September 30, 2009
because the inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Restricted stock and stock options totaling
approximately 500,000 shares and common shares issuable upon the assumed conversion of the Series B
preferred stock totaling 5,148,000 shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings
per share for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 because the inclusion would have been
anti-dilutive as a result of the net loss reported for the period.
Options to purchase 1.9 million and 2.1 million shares of common stock were outstanding during
the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and were not included in
the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options exercise prices were in excess
of the average market price of the common shares. During each of the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2009, options to purchase approximately 2 million shares of common stock were
outstanding and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the
options exercise prices were in excess of the average market price of the common shares.
Note 4 Common Stock Offering
On June 30, 2009, the Company received approximately $38 million in net proceeds through the
public offering of 11.5 million shares of its common stock, which included the issuance of 1.5
million shares pursuant to the underwriters over-allotment option.
Note 5 Long-Term Debt
On August 19, 2010, PetroQuest Energy, Inc. issued $150 million in principal amount of 10%
Senior Notes due 2017 (the Notes) in a public offering. The net proceeds of the offering,
together with cash on hand, were used to fund the tender offer and consent solicitation and
redemption of the Companys 103/8% Senior Notes due 2012. The Company incurred a loss totaling $6
million relating to the early retirement of the 103/8% Senior Notes. Approximately $1.8 million of
the loss related to non-cash amortization of deferred financing costs and discount associated with
the 103/8% Senior Notes.
At September 30, 2010, the estimated fair value of the Notes was $ 150.8 million, based upon a
market quote provided by an independent broker. The Notes have numerous covenants including
restrictions on liens, incurrence of indebtedness, asset sales, dividend payments and other
restricted payments. Interest is payable semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. At September
30, 2010, $1.8 million had been accrued in connection with the March 1, 2011 interest payment and
the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants contained in the Notes.
The Company and PetroQuest Energy, L.L.C. (the Borrower) have a Credit Agreement (as
amended, the Credit Agreement) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Calyon New York Branch, Bank of
America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Whitney National Bank. The Credit Agreement provides
the Company with a $300 million revolving credit facility that permits borrowings based on the
available borrowing base as determined in accordance with the Credit Agreement. The Credit
Agreement also allows the Company to use up to $25 million of the borrowing base for letters of
credit. In connection with the retirement of the 103/8% Senior Notes in August 2010, the maturity
date of the Credit Agreement was automatically extended to October 2, 2013. As of September 30,
2010 the Company had no borrowings outstanding under (and no letters of credit issued pursuant to)
the Credit Agreement and availability of $100 million.
The borrowing base under the Credit Agreement is based upon the valuation of the reserves
attributable to the Companys oil and gas properties as of January 1 and July 1 of each year. The
borrowing base, which is based upon the valuation of the reserves attributable to the Companys oil
and gas properties, is $100 million effective September 29, 2010. The next borrowing base
redetermination is scheduled to occur by March 31, 2011. The Company or the lenders may request
two additional borrowing base redeterminations each year. Each time the borrowing base is to be
re-determined, the administrative agent under the Credit Agreement will propose a new borrowing
base as it deems appropriate in its sole discretion, which must be approved by all lenders if the
borrowing base is to be increased, or by lenders holding two-thirds of the amounts outstanding
under the Credit Agreement if the borrowing base remains the same or is reduced.
7
Table of Contents
The Credit Agreement is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the assets of
the Company and its subsidiaries, including a lien on all equipment and at least 85% of the
aggregate total value of the Companys oil and gas properties. Outstanding balances under the
Credit Agreement bear interest at the alternate base rate (ABR) plus a margin (based on a sliding
scale of 1.625% to 2.625% depending on borrowing base usage) or the
adjusted LIBO rate (Eurodollar) plus a margin (based on a sliding scale of 2.5% to 3.5%
depending on borrowing base usage). The alternate base rate is equal to the highest of (i) the
JPMorgan Chase prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% or (iii) the adjusted
LIBO rate plus 1%. For the purposes of the definition of alternative base rate only, the adjusted
LIBO rate is equal to the rate at which dollar deposits of $5,000,000 with a one month maturity are
offered by the principal London office of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in immediately available funds
in the London interbank market. For all other purposes, the adjusted LIBO rate is equal to the
rate at which Eurodollar deposits in the London interbank market for one, two, three or six months
(as selected by the Company) are quoted, as adjusted for statutory reserve requirements for
Eurocurrency liabilities. Outstanding letters of credit are charged a participation fee at a per
annum rate equal to the margin applicable to Eurodollar loans, a fronting fee and customary
administrative fees. In addition, the Company pays commitment fees of 0.5%.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain restrictive financial covenants under
the Credit Agreement, including a maximum ratio of total debt to EBITDAX, determined on a rolling
four quarter basis, of 3.0 to 1.0 and a minimum ratio of consolidated current assets to
consolidated current liabilities of 1.0 to 1.0, all as defined in the Credit Agreement. The Credit
Agreement also includes customary restrictions with respect to debt, liens, dividends,
distributions and redemptions, investments, loans and advances, nature of business, international
operations and foreign subsidiaries, leases, sale or discount of receivables, mergers or
consolidations, sales of properties, transactions with affiliates, negative pledge agreements, gas
imbalances and swap agreements. As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all of
the covenants contained in the Credit Agreement.
Note 6 Asset Retirement Obligation
The Company accounts for asset retirement obligations in accordance with ASC Topic 410-20,
which requires recording the fair value of an asset retirement obligation associated with tangible
long-lived assets in the period incurred. Asset retirement obligations associated with long-lived
assets included within the scope of ASC Topic 410-20 are those for which there is a legal
obligation to settle under existing or enacted law, statute, written or oral contract or by legal
construction under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. The Company has legal obligations to plug,
abandon and dismantle existing wells and facilities that it has acquired and constructed.
The following table describes all changes to the Companys asset retirement obligation
liability (in thousands):
Asset retirement obligation at January 1, 2010 |
$ | 23,916 | ||
Liabilities incurred |
175 | |||
Liabilities settled |
(6,760 | ) | ||
Accretion expense |
1,300 | |||
Revisions in estimated cash flows |
1,168 | |||
Asset retirement obligation at September 30, 2010 |
19,799 | |||
Less: current portion of asset retirement obligation |
(1,785 | ) | ||
Long-term asset retirement obligation |
$ | 18,014 | ||
Liabilities settled during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 included two offshore
fields that were completely decommissioned and the liability for an additional offshore platform in
the amount of $1.1 million that was transferred to a third party related to a farmout, which
represents a non-cash investing activity for purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows.
8
Table of Contents
Note 7 Share Based Compensation
The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718.
Share-based compensation expense is reflected as a component of the Companys general and
administrative expense. Approximately $455,000 of share based compensation in the third quarter of
2010 was the result of the voluntary early cancellation of certain stock options and accelerated
recognition of associated compensation expense. A detail of share-based compensation for the
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Stock options: |
||||||||||||||||
Incentive Stock Options |
$ | 256 | $ | 151 | $ | 688 | $ | 591 | ||||||||
Non-Qualified Stock
Options |
816 | 343 | 1,890 | 1,460 | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
1,039 | 715 | 3,285 | 2,683 | ||||||||||||
Share based
compensation |
$ | 2,111 | $ | 1,209 | $ | 5,863 | $ | 4,734 | ||||||||
Note 8 Ceiling Test
The Company uses the full cost method to account for its oil and gas properties. Accordingly,
the costs to acquire, explore for and develop oil and gas properties are capitalized. Capitalized
costs of oil and gas properties, net of accumulated DD&A and related deferred taxes, are limited to
the estimated future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves, including the effects of cash
flow hedges in place, discounted at 10%, plus the lower of cost or fair value of unproved
properties, as adjusted for related income tax effects (the full cost ceiling). If capitalized
costs exceed the full cost ceiling, the excess is charged to ceiling test write down of oil and gas
properties in the quarter in which the excess occurs.
As a result of lower prices at March 31, 2009, and the associated negative impact on certain
of the Companys proved reserves and estimated future net cash flows, the Company recognized a
ceiling test write-down of $103.6 million at March 31, 2009.
Note 9 Derivative Instruments
The Company seeks to reduce its exposure to commodity price volatility by hedging a portion of
its production through commodity derivative instruments. The Company accounts for commodity
derivatives in accordance with ASC Topic 815. When the conditions for hedge accounting specified
in ASC Topic 815 are met, the Company may designate its commodity derivatives as cash flow hedges.
The changes in fair value of derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting treatment are
recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged oil or natural gas quantities are
produced. If a hedge becomes ineffective because the hedged production does not occur, or the
hedge otherwise does not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, the changes in the fair value of
the derivative would be recorded in the income statement as derivative income or expense. At
September 30, 2010, the Companys outstanding derivative instruments were considered effective cash
flow hedges.
Oil and gas sales include additions related to the settlement of gas hedges of $4,550,000 and
$20,996,000 and oil hedges of zero and $1,167,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. For the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, oil and gas
sales include additions related to the settlement of gas hedges of $10,837,000 and $57,415,000 and
oil hedges of zero and $4,682,000, respectively.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had entered into the following gas contracts accounted
for as cash flow hedges:
Instrument | Weighted | |||||||||||
Production Period | Type | Daily Volumes | Average Price | |||||||||
Natural Gas: |
||||||||||||
October-December 2010 |
Costless Collar | 40,000 Mmbtu | $ | 5.62 6.27 |
At September 30, 2010, the Company recognized a net asset of approximately $6.2 million
related to the estimated fair value of these derivative instruments. Based on estimated future
commodity prices as of September 30, 2010, the Company would realize a $3.9 million gain, net of
taxes, as an increase in gas sales during the fourth
quarter of 2010. These gains are expected to be reclassified based on the schedule of gas volumes
stipulated in the derivative contracts.
9
Table of Contents
All of the Companys derivative instruments at September 30, 2010 were designated as hedging
instruments under ASC Topic 815. The following tables reflect the fair value of the Companys
derivative instruments in the consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2010:
Asset Derivatives | ||||||||
Balance Sheet | ||||||||
Instrument | Location | Fair Value | ||||||
Commodity Derivatives |
Hedging asset | $ | 6,187 |
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2009:
Asset Derivatives | ||||||||
Balance Sheet | ||||||||
Instrument | Location | Fair Value | ||||||
Commodity Derivatives |
Hedging asset | $ | 2,796 |
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
Amount of Loss | Location of | Amount of Gain | ||||||||||
Recognized in Other | Gain Reclassified | Reclassified into | ||||||||||
Instrument | Comprehensive Income | into Income | Income | |||||||||
Commodity
Derivatives at
Sept. 30, 2010 |
$ | (186 | ) | Oil and gas sales | $ | 4,550 | ||||||
Commodity
Derivatives at
Sept. 30, 2009 |
$ | (12,950 | ) | Oil and gas sales | $ | 22,163 |
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
Amount of Income (Loss) | Location of | Amount of Gain | ||||||||||
Recognized in Other | Gain Reclassified | Reclassified into | ||||||||||
Instrument | Comprehensive Income | into Income | Income | |||||||||
Commodity
Derivatives at
Sept. 30, 2010 |
$ | 2,117 | Oil and gas sales | $ | 10,837 | |||||||
Commodity
Derivatives at
Sept. 30, 2009 |
$ | (16,660 | ) | Oil and gas sales | $ | 62,097 |
As defined in ASC Topic 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. As presented in the tables below, this hierarchy
consists of three broad levels:
| Level 1: valuations consist of unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities and has the highest priority; |
||
| Level 2: valuations rely on quoted prices in markets that are not active or observable
inputs over the full term of the asset or liability; |
||
| Level 3: valuations are based on prices or third party or internal valuation models
that require inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement and are less
observable and thus have the lowest priority. |
The Company classifies its commodity derivatives based upon the data used to determine fair
value. The Companys derivative instruments at September 30, 2010 were in the form of costless
collars based on NYMEX pricing. The fair value of these derivatives is derived using an
independent third-partys valuation model that utilizes market-corroborated inputs that are
observable over the term of the derivative contract. The Companys fair value calculations also
incorporate an estimate of the counterparties default risk for derivative assets and an
estimate of the Companys default risk for derivative liabilities. As a result, the Company
designates its commodity derivatives as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
10
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the valuation of the Companys derivatives subject to fair value
measurement on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||
Quoted Prices | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||
in Active | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||
Instrument | Markets (Level 1) | Inputs (Level 2) | Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||
Commodity Derivatives: |
||||||||||||
At September 30, 2010 |
$ | | $ | 6,187 | $ | | ||||||
At December 31, 2009 |
$ | | $ | 2,796 | $ | |
Note 10 Woodford Shale Joint Development Agreement
In May 2010, PetroQuest Energy, L.L.C. entered into a joint development agreement with WSGP
Gas Producing LLC (WSGP), a subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources, LLC, whereby WSGP acquired 50%
of the Companys Woodford proved undeveloped reserves as well as the right to earn 50% of the
Companys undeveloped Woodford acreage position through a two phase drilling program. The Company
received $57.4 million in cash at closing, net of $2.6 million in fees incurred in relation to the
transaction. The Company also recorded a long-term receivable for an additional $14 million to be
received on November 30, 2011 which represents a non-cash investing activity for purposes of the
Statement of Cash Flows. The Company recorded the total consideration of approximately $71 million
as an adjustment to capitalized costs with no gain or loss recognized. If certain production
performance metrics are achieved, the Company will receive an additional $14 million during the
drilling program. Additionally, WSGP will fund a share of the future drilling costs under a
drilling program.
Note 11 Gain on Legal Settlement and Other Expense
In January 2010, the Company recorded a gain relative to a $9 million cash settlement received
from a lawsuit that was originally filed by the Company in 2008 relating to disputed interests in
certain oil and gas assets purchased in 2007. The gain was reduced by approximately $0.8 million
of costs incurred by the Company directly related to the settlement. In addition to the cash
proceeds received, the Company was assigned additional working interests in certain producing
properties. The Company recorded an additional $4.2 million gain representing the estimated fair
market value of those interests on the effective date of the settlement.
Other expense during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 included
approximately $0.6 million and $5.3 million, respectively, related to payments made in connection
with a drilling rig contract. Because this rig was not utilized, there were no corresponding
assets to record in connection with the fixed payments required, regardless of actual rig usage.
Therefore, the costs were recorded as a component of other expense. This contract expired during
July 2009.
Note 12 Income Taxes
The Company typically provides for income taxes at a statutory rate of 35% adjusted for
permanent differences expected to be realized, primarily statutory depletion, non-deductible stock
compensation expenses and state income taxes. As a result of the ceiling test write-downs
recognized during 2008 and 2009, the Company has incurred a cumulative three-year loss. As a
result of this cumulative loss and the impact it has on the determination of the recoverability of
deferred tax assets through future earnings, the Company established a valuation allowance for a
portion of the deferred tax asset. The Company reduced the valuation allowance by $17.2 million
during the first nine months of 2010, the impact of which is included in the Companys effective
tax rate. The valuation allowance was $7.4 million as of September 30, 2010.
11
Table of Contents
Item 2.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
PetroQuest Energy, Inc. is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the exploration,
development, acquisition and production of oil and gas reserves in the Arkoma Basin, East Texas,
South Louisiana and the shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico shelf. We seek to grow our production,
proved reserves, cash flow and earnings at low finding and development costs through a balanced mix
of exploration, development and acquisition activities. From the commencement of our operations in
1985 through 2002, we were focused exclusively in the Gulf Coast Basin with onshore properties
principally in southern Louisiana and offshore properties in the shallow waters of the Gulf of
Mexico shelf. During 2003, we began the implementation of our strategic goal of diversifying our
reserves and production into longer life and lower risk onshore properties. As part of the
strategic shift to diversify our asset portfolio and lower our geographic and geologic risk
profile, we refocused our opportunity selection processes to reduce our average working interest in
higher risk projects, shift capital to higher probability of success onshore wells and mitigate the
risks associated with individual wells by expanding our drilling program across multiple basins.
Utilizing the cash flow generated by our higher margin Gulf Coast Basin assets, we have
successfully diversified into onshore, longer life assets, including the Woodford and Fayetteville
shales in Oklahoma and Arkansas and the Southeast Carthage field in Texas. Beginning in 2003, with
our acquisition of the Southeast Carthage Field, through 2009, we have invested approximately $650
million into growing our longer life assets. During the six year period ended December 31, 2009, we
have more than doubled our estimated proved reserves to 179 Bcfe and realized a 97% drilling
success rate on 551 gross wells drilled. We have continued to focus our efforts on properties we
control. At December 31, 2009, we operated approximately 75% of our total estimated proved reserves
and managed the drilling and completion activities on an additional 15% of such reserves. We have
grown our production to 86.4 MMcfe per day for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. At September
30, 2010, 85% of our estimated proved reserves and 54% of our third quarter 2010 production were
derived from our longer life assets.
During late 2008, in response to declining commodity prices and the global financial crisis,
we shifted our focus from increasing production and reserves to building liquidity and
strengthening our balance sheet. As a result of our significant operational control over our
drilling prospects, we were able to reduce our capital expenditures, including capitalized interest
and overhead, by 83% from $357.8 million in 2008 to $59.1 million in 2009. In addition, we reduced
our lease operating expenses, production taxes and general and administrative costs, by a combined
23% from 2008 to 2009. Finally, in June 2009 we completed a public offering of 11.5 million shares
of our common stock, receiving net proceeds of approximately $38 million. As a result of these and
other liquidity building efforts, we have repaid $130 million of borrowings outstanding under our
bank credit facility since August 2009. As of September 30, 2010, we had no borrowings outstanding
under this facility.
Having achieved our 2009 goals of building liquidity and strengthening our balance sheet, in
2010 we have refocused on the key elements of our business strategy with the goal of growing our
reserves and production in a fiscally prudent manner. To that end, in May 2010, we entered into a
joint development agreement with WSGP Gas Producing LLC (WSGP), a subsidiary of NextEra Energy
Resources, LLC, whereby WSGP acquired 50% of our Woodford proved undeveloped reserves as well as
the right to earn 50% of our undeveloped Woodford acreage position through a two phase drilling
program. We received $57.4 million in cash at closing, net of $2.6 million in transaction fees,
and will receive an additional $14 million on November 30, 2011. If certain production performance
metrics are achieved we will receive an additional $14 million in the future, which we estimate
could occur during 2011. Additionally, WSGP will fund a share of our future drilling costs under a
drilling program. The additional capital provided by this agreement will allow us to accelerate
the pace of our development of the Woodford Shale and pursue opportunities in other basins.
During August 2010, we issued $150 million in principal amount of 10% Senior Notes due 2017
(the Notes) in a public offering. The net proceeds of the offering, together with cash on hand,
were used to fund the tender offer and consent solicitation and redemption of the Companys 103/8%
Senior Notes due 2012. In connection with the retirement of the 103/8% Senior Notes in August 2010,
the maturity date of our bank credit facility was automatically extended to October 2, 2013.
12
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies
Reserve Estimates
Our estimates of proved oil and gas reserves constitute those quantities of oil and gas,
which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty
to be economically produciblefrom a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing
economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulationsprior to the time at which
contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is
reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the
estimation. At the end of each year, our proved reserves are estimated by independent petroleum
engineers in accordance with guidelines established by the SEC. These estimates, however,
represent projections based on geologic and engineering data. Reserve engineering is a subjective
process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas that are difficult to measure. The
accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quantity and quality of available data,
engineering and geological interpretation and professional judgment. Estimates of economically
recoverable oil and gas reserves and future net cash flows necessarily depend upon a number of
variable factors and assumptions, such as historical production from the area compared with
production from other producing areas, the assumed effect of regulations by governmental agencies,
and assumptions governing future oil and gas prices, future operating costs, severance taxes,
development costs and workover costs. The future drilling costs associated with reserves assigned
to proved undeveloped locations may ultimately increase to the extent that these reserves may be
later determined to be uneconomic. Any significant variance in the assumptions could materially
affect the estimated quantity and value of the reserves, which could affect the carrying value of
our oil and gas properties and/or the rate of depletion of such oil and gas properties.
On December 29, 2008, the SEC issued a revision to Staff Accounting Bulletin 113 (SAB 113)
which established guidelines related to modernizing accounting and disclosure requirements for oil
and natural gas companies. The revised disclosure requirements include provisions that permit the
use of new technologies to determine proved reserves if those technologies have been demonstrated
empirically to lead to reliable conclusions about reserve volumes. The revised rules also allow
companies the option to disclose probable and possible reserves in addition to the existing
requirement to disclose proved reserves. The revised disclosure requirements also require companies
to report the independence and qualifications of third party preparers of reserves and file reports
when a third party is relied upon to prepare reserves estimates. A significant change to the rules
involves the pricing at which reserves are measured. The revised rules utilize a 12-month average
price using beginning of the month pricing during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of
the balance sheet to report oil and natural gas reserves rather than period-end prices. In
addition, the 12-month average will also be used to measure ceiling test impairments and to compute
depreciation, depletion and amortization. The revised rules were effective as of December 31, 2009
with first reporting for calendar year companies in their 2009 annual reports.
Full Cost Method of Accounting
We use the full cost method of accounting for our investments in oil and gas properties.
Under this method, all acquisition, exploration and development costs, including certain related
employee costs, incurred for the purpose of exploring for and developing oil and natural gas are
capitalized. Acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase, lease or otherwise acquire
property. Exploration costs include the costs of drilling exploratory wells, including those in
progress and geological and geophysical service costs in exploration activities. Development costs
include the costs of drilling development wells and costs of completions, platforms, facilities and
pipelines. Costs associated with production and general corporate activities are expensed in the
period incurred. Sales of proved oil and gas properties are accounted for as adjustments of
capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recognized, unless such adjustments would significantly
alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and gas.
The costs associated with unevaluated properties are not initially included in the
amortization base and primarily relate to ongoing exploration activities, unevaluated leasehold
acreage and delay rentals, seismic data and capitalized interest. These costs are either
transferred to the amortization base with the costs of drilling the related well or are assessed
quarterly for possible impairment or reduction in value.
We compute the provision for depletion of oil and gas properties using the unit-of-production
method based upon production and estimates of proved reserve quantities. Unevaluated costs and
related carrying costs are excluded from the amortization base until the properties associated with
these costs are evaluated. In addition to costs associated with evaluated properties, the
amortization base includes estimated future development costs related to non-producing reserves.
Our depletion expense is affected by the estimates of future development costs, unevaluated costs
and proved reserves, and changes in these estimates could have an impact on our future earnings.
13
Table of Contents
We capitalize certain internal costs that are directly identified with acquisition,
exploration and development activities. The capitalized internal costs include salaries, employee
benefits, costs of consulting services and other related expenses and do not include costs related
to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. We also capitalize a portion of
the interest costs incurred on our debt. Capitalized interest is calculated using the amount of
our unevaluated property and our effective borrowing rate.
Capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, net of accumulated DD&A and related deferred
taxes, are limited to the estimated future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves,
discounted at 10 percent, plus the lower of cost or fair value of unproved properties, as adjusted
for related income tax effects (the full cost ceiling). If capitalized costs exceed the full cost
ceiling, the excess is charged to write-down of oil and gas properties in the quarter in which the
excess occurs.
Given the volatility of oil and gas prices, it is probable that our estimate of discounted
future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves will change in the near term. If oil or gas
prices decline, even for only a short period of time, or if we have downward revisions to our
estimated proved reserves, it is possible that write-downs of oil and gas properties could occur in
the future.
Future Abandonment Costs
Future abandonment costs include costs to dismantle and relocate or dispose of our production
platforms, gathering systems, wells and related structures and restoration costs of land and
seabed. We develop estimates of these costs for each of our properties based upon the type of
production structure, depth of water, reservoir characteristics, depth of the reservoir, market
demand for equipment, currently available procedures and consultations with construction and
engineering consultants. Because these costs typically extend many years into the future,
estimating these future costs is difficult and requires management to make estimates and judgments
that are subject to future revisions based upon numerous factors, including changing technology,
the timing of estimated costs, the impact of future inflation on current cost estimates and the
political and regulatory environment.
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE, formerly known as
the MMS) regulates the guidelines for decommissioning abandoned well bores, platforms and pipelines
and clearing sites. On September 15, 2010, the BOEMRE issued a Notice to Lessees (NTL) No.
2010-G05, referred to as Idle Iron. Among other things, this NTL mandates that companies have
five years to completely decommission the well bore and all structures once the well or structure
is no longer in use. We do not expect this NTL to materially affect the timing or cost estimates
related to our future abandonment plans.
Derivative Instruments
The estimated fair values of our commodity derivative instruments are recorded in the
consolidated balance sheet. At inception, all of our commodity derivative instruments represent
hedges of the price of future oil and gas production. The changes in fair value of those
derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting treatment are recorded in other
comprehensive income until the hedged oil or natural gas quantities are produced. If a hedge
becomes ineffective because the hedged production does not occur, or the hedge otherwise does not
qualify for hedge accounting treatment, the changes in the fair value of the derivative are
recorded in the income statement as derivative income or expense.
Our hedges are specifically referenced to NYMEX prices. We evaluate the effectiveness of our
hedges at the time we enter the contracts, and periodically over the life of the contracts, by
analyzing the correlation between NYMEX prices and the posted prices we receive from our designated
production. Through this analysis, we are able to determine if a high correlation exists between
the prices received for the designated production and the NYMEX prices at which the hedges will be
settled. At September 30, 2010, our derivative instruments were considered effective cash flow
hedges.
Estimating the fair value of derivative instruments requires valuation calculations
incorporating estimates of future NYMEX prices, discount rates and price movements. As a result,
we obtain the fair value of our commodity derivatives using an independent third-partys valuation
model that utilizes market-corroborated inputs that are observable over the term of the derivative
contract. Our fair value calculations also incorporate an estimate of the counterparties default
risk for derivative assets and an estimate of our default risk for derivative liabilities.
14
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our oil and gas operations
for the periods noted. These historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be
expected in future periods.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Production: |
||||||||||||||||
Oil (Bbls) |
190,070 | 137,077 | 488,996 | 450,676 | ||||||||||||
Gas (Mcf) |
6,809,122 | 7,169,167 | 20,075,695 | 23,944,666 | ||||||||||||
Total Production (Mcfe) |
7,949,542 | 7,991,629 | 23,009,671 | 26,648,722 | ||||||||||||
Sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Total oil sales |
$ | 14,552,796 | $ | 10,324,647 | $ | 37,840,190 | $ | 29,028,227 | ||||||||
Total gas sales |
31,676,498 | 39,857,782 | 97,791,025 | 135,764,007 | ||||||||||||
Total oil and gas sales |
$ | 46,229,294 | $ | 50,182,429 | $ | 135,631,215 | $ | 164,792,234 | ||||||||
Average sales prices: |
||||||||||||||||
Oil (per Bbl) |
$ | 76.57 | $ | 75.32 | $ | 77.38 | $ | 64.41 | ||||||||
Gas (per Mcf) |
4.65 | 5.56 | 4.87 | 5.67 | ||||||||||||
Per Mcfe |
5.82 | 6.28 | 5.89 | 6.18 |
The above sales and average sales prices include additions related to the settlement of gas hedges
of $4,550,000 and $20,996,000 and the settlement of oil hedges of zero and $1,167,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The above sales and average sales prices
include additions related to the settlement of gas hedges of $10,837,000 and $57,415,000 and the
settlement of oil hedges of zero and $4,682,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
Net income available to common stockholders totaled $4,939,000 and $4,453,000 for the quarters
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, while net income (loss) available to common
stockholders for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 totaled $39,904,000 and
($54,758,000), respectively. The primary fluctuations were as follows:
Production Oil and gas production decreased 14% in the first nine months of 2010, as
compared to the 2009 period, as a result of reduced capital spending during 2009. In addition,
during the second quarter of 2010, we experienced unanticipated shut-ins at our Ship Shoal 72 and
Main Pass 74 fields due to facility maintenance and third party pipeline repairs. Production at
both fields has been fully restored. We expect total 2010 production to be slightly lower than
volumes produced during 2009. Because of our increased drilling program and drilling success in
2010, we expect 2011 production volumes to increase from 2010 amounts.
Gas production during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 decreased 5% and
16%, respectively, from the comparable periods in 2009. The decreases in gas production were
primarily the result of reduced capital spending during 2009 and normal production declines in
Oklahoma, where initial production rates are higher than the sustained rates over the life of the
wells. The unanticipated shut-ins at Ship Shoal Block 72 and Main Pass Block 74 also contributed
to the production decrease in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Oil production during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 increased 39% and
9% from the 2009 periods due to the restoration of production at our Ship Shoal 225 field after
repairs and a recompletion following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. In addition, our oil production
rates have increased from the drilling success of our Lynlakes prospect in June 2010 and
recompletions at our Ship Shoal 72 field.
Prices Including the effects of our hedges, average gas prices per Mcf for the three and
nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 were $4.65 and $4.87, respectively, as compared to
$5.56 and $5.67 for the respective 2009 periods. Average oil prices per Bbl for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 were $76.57 and $77.38, respectively, as compared to $75.32 and
$64.41, respectively, for the 2009 periods. Stated on an Mcfe basis, unit prices received during
the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were 7% and 5% lower than the prices received
during the comparable 2009 periods.
15
Table of Contents
Revenue Including the effects of hedges, oil and gas sales during the quarter and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 decreased 8% and 18% to $46,229,000 and $135,631,000, respectively,
as compared to oil and gas sales of $50,182,000 and $164,792,000 during the 2009 periods. The
decreased revenue during 2010 was primarily the result of lower production and a decrease in hedge
settlements realized during the first nine months of 2010 as compared to 2009. As a result of the
impact of the settlements of our higher valued hedge positions on 2009 oil and gas sales as
compared to the expected impact of our 2010 hedge positions, we expect oil and gas revenue to
decline during the fourth quarter of 2010 as compared to 2009.
Expenses Lease operating expenses for the three month period ended September 30, 2010
increased to $9,742,000 as compared to $9,665,000 during the 2009 period primarily as a result of
unanticipated maintenance costs. Per unit lease operating expenses totaled $1.23 per Mcfe during
the three month period ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $1.21 per Mcfe during the 2009
period. Lease operating expenses for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 decreased to
$28,457,000 as compared to $29,171,000 during the 2009 period. Per unit lease operating expenses
totaled $1.24 per Mcfe during the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $1.09
per Mcfe during the 2009 period. Per unit lease operating expenses increased and absolute lease
operating expenses decreased during the first nine months of 2010 as compared to the 2009 period
primarily due to the overall reduction in produced volumes. Lower insurance costs also contributed
to the decrease in absolute lease operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
We expect that lease operating expenses in the fourth quarter of 2010 will be lower than third
quarter 2010 due to reduced maintenance costs. Lease operating expenses in 2011 are expected to
generally approximate lease operating expenses in 2010.
Production tax refunds received during the third quarters of 2010 and 2009 resulted in
significantly lower production taxes during the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
totaling $361,000 and $176,000, respectively. Production taxes for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009 totaled $3,308,000 and $3,196,000, respectively.
General and administrative expenses during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010
totaled $5,581,000 and $15,906,000, respectively, as compared to expenses of $4,142,000 and
$13,164,000 during the 2009 periods. Included in general and administrative expenses was
share-based compensation expense related to ASC Topic 718, as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Stock options: |
||||||||||||||||
Incentive Stock Options |
$ | 256 | $ | 151 | $ | 688 | $ | 591 | ||||||||
Non-Qualified Stock
Options |
816 | 343 | 1,890 | 1,460 | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
1,039 | 715 | 3,285 | 2,683 | ||||||||||||
Share based
compensation |
$ | 2,111 | $ | 1,209 | $ | 5,863 | $ | 4,734 | ||||||||
Approximately $455,000 of share based compensation in the third quarter of 2010 was the result of
the voluntary early cancellation of certain stock options and accelerated recognition of associated
compensation expense. We capitalized $2,621,000 and $9,147,000 of general and administrative costs
during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and $1,916,000 and $6,143,000 of
such costs during the comparable 2009 periods. We expect that 2010 general and administrative
expenses will be higher than 2009 expenses due to increased employee related costs, including
increased staffing due to the Woodford Shale joint development agreement.
The price of natural gas used in computing our estimated proved reserves at March 31, 2009 had a
negative impact on our estimated proved reserves from certain of our longer-life properties and
reduced the estimated future net cash flows from our estimated proved reserves. As a result, we
recorded a non-cash ceiling test write-down of our oil and gas properties during the first quarter
of 2009 totaling $103,582,000. No such write-down was recorded during the first nine months of
2010.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) expense on oil and gas properties for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled $14,429,000, or $1.82 per Mcfe, and $42,648,000,
or $1.85 per Mcfe, respectively, as compared to $17,643,000, or $2.21 per Mcfe, and $67,268,000, or
$2.52 per Mcfe, during the comparable 2009 periods. The declines in our DD&A per Mcfe were
primarily the result of the ceiling test write-downs of a substantial portion of our proved oil and
gas properties during 2009 as a result of lower commodity prices, the impact of the Woodford Shale
joint development agreement, as well as reserve additions during 2010
from our Woodford operations. We expect DD&A per Mcfe for the fourth quarter of 2010 to generally
approximate the third quarter of 2010 rate.
16
Table of Contents
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized on unevaluated properties, totaled $3,147,000 and
$7,336,000 during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $3,531,000
and $10,095,000 during the 2009 periods. We capitalized $1,562,000 and $6,285,000 of interest
during three and nine month periods of 2010 and $2,113,000 and $6,350,000 during the 2009 periods.
We have reduced the outstanding borrowings under our bank credit facility from $100 million at
September 30, 2009 to zero at September 30, 2010. We also retired our 10 3/8% Senior Notes due
2012 during August 2010 in connection with the issuance of our 10% Senior Notes due 2017, which
will result in a further decrease in our interest expense for the remainder of 2010.
As a result of the early retirement of our 10 3/8% Senior Notes, we incurred a loss during the
third quarter of 2010 totaling $5,973,000. Approximately $1,785,000 of the loss related to non-cash
amortization of deferred financing costs and discount associated with the 103/8% Senior Notes.
In January 2010, we recorded a gain relative to a $9,000,000 cash settlement received from a
lawsuit filed by us in 2008 relating to disputed interests in certain oil and gas assets purchased
in 2007. The gain was reduced by $775,000 of costs incurred by us directly related to the
settlement. In addition to the cash proceeds received, we were assigned additional working
interests in certain producing properties. We recorded an additional $4,164,000 gain representing
the estimated fair market value of those interests on the effective date of the settlement.
Other expense during the third quarter and nine months of 2009 included $634,000 and $5,280,000,
respectively, related to payments made in connection with a drilling rig contract. Because we
elected to idle this drilling rig, there were no corresponding assets to record in connection with
the fixed payments required under this contract, regardless of actual rig usage. As a result, the
costs were recorded as a component of other expense. This contract expired during July 2009.
Income tax expense (benefit) during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled
$299,000 and ($1,081,000), respectively, as compared to $7,876,000 and ($18,772,000) during the
comparable 2009 periods. We typically provide for income taxes at a statutory rate of 35% adjusted
for permanent differences expected to be realized, primarily statutory depletion, non-deductible
stock compensation expenses and state income taxes.
As a result of the ceiling test write-downs recognized during 2008 and 2009, we have incurred a
cumulative three-year loss. As a result of this cumulative loss and the impact it has on the
determination of the recoverability of deferred tax assets through future earnings, we established
a valuation allowance for a portion of the deferred tax asset. We reduced the valuation allowance
by $17,213,000 during the first nine months of 2010, the impact of which is included in our
effective tax rate. The valuation allowance was $7,400,000 as of September 30, 2010. Our
effective tax rate in future periods will be impacted by future adjustments to the valuation
allowance.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed our acquisition, exploration and development activities to date principally
through cash flow from operations, bank borrowings, private and public offerings of equity and debt
securities, joint development agreements and sales of assets. At September 30, 2010, we had a
working capital surplus of $62.3 million compared to a surplus of $24.7 million at December 31,
2009. The increase was primarily due to the cash received from the Woodford Shale joint
development agreement and the settlement of the lawsuit discussed above.
Prices for oil and natural gas are subject to many factors beyond our control such as weather,
the overall condition of the global financial markets and economies, relatively minor changes in
the outlook of supply and demand, and the actions of OPEC. Oil and natural gas prices have a
significant impact on our cash flows available for capital expenditures and our ability to borrow
and raise additional capital. The amount we can borrow under our bank credit facility is subject to
periodic re-determination based in part on changing expectations of future prices. Lower prices may
also reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we can economically produce. Lower prices
and/or lower production may decrease revenues, cash flows and the borrowing base under the bank
credit facility, thus reducing the amount of financial resources available to meet our capital
requirements. Lower prices and reduced cash flow may also make it difficult to incur debt,
including under our bank credit facility, because of the restrictive covenants in the indenture
governing the Notes. See Source of Capital: Debt below. Our ability to comply with the covenants
in our debt agreements is dependent upon the success of our exploration and development program and
upon factors beyond our control, such as oil and natural gas prices.
Source of Capital: Operations
Net cash flow from operations increased from $86,639,000 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 to $96,194,000 during the 2010 period. The increase in operating cash flow
during 2010 was primarily attributable to the timing of payments made in 2009 to reduce our
accounts payable to vendors and the cash received during the first quarter of 2010 in connection
with a legal settlement. Partially offsetting these increases was an increase to our joint
interest billing receivables, which is a result of the increase in drilling activity.
17
Table of Contents
Source of Capital: Debt
On August 19, 2010, we issued $150 million in principal amount of 10% Senior Notes due
September 1, 2017 (the Notes) in a public offering. The net proceeds of the offering, together
with cash on hand, were used to fund our tender offer and consent solicitation and redemption of
our
103/8% Senior Notes due 2012. In total, we incurred a loss of $5,973,000 relating to the early
retirement of the 10 3/8% Senior Notes. Approximately $1.8 million of the loss related to non-cash
amortization of deferred financing costs and discount associated with the 103/8% Senior Notes.
At September 30, 2010, the estimated fair value of the Notes was $150.8 million, based upon a
market quote provided by an independent broker. The Notes have numerous covenants including
restrictions on liens, incurrence of indebtedness, asset sales, dividend payments and other
restricted payments. Interest is payable semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. At September
30, 2010, $1.8 million had been accrued in connection with the March 1, 2011 interest payment and
we were in compliance with all of the covenants contained in the Notes.
We have a Credit Agreement (as amended, the Credit Agreement) with JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A., Calyon New York Branch, Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Whitney National
Bank. The Credit Agreement provides us with a $300 million revolving credit facility that permits
borrowings based on the available borrowing base as determined in accordance with the Credit
Agreement. The Credit Agreement also allows us to use up to $25 million of the borrowing base for
letters of credit. In connection with the retirement of the 103/8% Senior Notes in August 2010, the
maturity date was automatically extended to October 2, 2013. As of September 30, 2010 we had no
borrowings outstanding under (and no letters of credit issued pursuant to) the Credit Agreement and
availability of $100 million.
The borrowing base under the Credit Agreement is based upon the valuation of the reserves
attributable to our oil and gas properties as of January 1 and July 1 of each year. The borrowing
base, which was based upon the valuation of the reserves attributable to our oil and gas
properties, is $100 million effective September 29, 2010. The next borrowing base redetermination
is scheduled to occur by March 31, 2011. We or the lenders may request two additional borrowing
base redeterminations each year. Each time the borrowing base is to be re-determined, the
administrative agent under the Credit Agreement will propose a new borrowing base as it deems
appropriate in its sole discretion, which must be approved by all lenders if the borrowing base is
to be increased, or by lenders holding two-thirds of the amounts outstanding under the Credit
Agreement if the borrowing base remains the same or is reduced.
The Credit Agreement is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of our assets,
including a lien on all equipment and at least 85% of the aggregate total value of our oil and gas
properties. Outstanding balances under the Credit Agreement bear interest at the alternate base
rate (ABR) plus a margin (based on a sliding scale of 1.625% to 2.625% depending on borrowing
base usage) or the adjusted LIBO rate (Eurodollar) plus a margin (based on a sliding scale of
2.5% to 3.5% depending on borrowing base usage). The alternate base rate is equal to the highest
of (i) the JPMorgan Chase prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% or (iii) the
adjusted LIBO rate plus 1%. For the purposes of the definition of alternative base rate only, the
adjusted LIBO rate is equal to the rate at which dollar deposits of $5,000,000 with a one month
maturity are offered by the principal London office of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in immediately
available funds in the London interbank market. For all other purposes, the adjusted LIBO rate is
equal to the rate at which Eurodollar deposits in the London interbank market for one, two, three
or six months (as selected by us) are quoted, as adjusted for statutory reserve requirements for
Eurocurrency liabilities. Outstanding letters of credit are charged a participation fee at a per
annum rate equal to the margin applicable to Eurodollar loans, a fronting fee and customary
administrative fees. In addition, we pay commitment fees of 0.5%.
We are subject to certain restrictive financial covenants under the Credit Agreement,
including a maximum ratio of total debt to EBITDAX, determined on a rolling four quarter basis, of
3.0 to 1.0 and a minimum ratio of consolidated current assets to consolidated current liabilities
of 1.0 to 1.0, all as defined in the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement also includes
customary restrictions with respect to debt, liens, dividends, distributions and redemptions,
investments, loans and advances, nature of business, international operations and foreign
subsidiaries, leases, sale or discount of receivables, mergers or consolidations, sales of
properties, transactions with affiliates, negative pledge agreements, gas imbalances and swap
agreements. As of September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all of the covenants contained in
the Credit Agreement.
Source of Capital: Issuance of Securities
On June 30, 2009, we received net proceeds of approximately $38 million through the public
offering of 11.5 million shares of our common stock, which included the issuance of 1.5 million
shares pursuant to the underwriters over-allotment option.
18
Table of Contents
During October 2010, a new shelf registration statement was declared effective and allows us
to publicly offer and sell up to $250 million of any combination of debt securities, shares of
common and preferred stock, depositary shares and warrants. The registration statement does not
provide any assurance that we will or could sell any such securities.
Source of Capital: Joint Ventures
In May 2010, we entered into a joint development agreement with WSGP, a subsidiary of NextEra
Energy Resources, LLC, whereby WSGP acquired 50% of our Woodford proved undeveloped reserves as
well as the right to earn 50% of our undeveloped Woodford acreage position through a two phase
drilling program. We received $57.4 million in cash at closing, net of $2.6 million in transaction
fees, and will receive an additional $14 million on November 30, 2011. If certain production
performance metrics are achieved, we will receive an additional $14 million during the drilling
program. Additionally, WSGP will fund a share of our future drilling costs under a drilling
program. The additional capital provided by this agreement will allow us to accelerate the pace of
our development of the Woodford Shale and pursue opportunities in other basins.
Source of Capital: Divestitures
We do not budget property divestitures; however, we are continually evaluating our property
base to determine if there are assets in our portfolio that no longer meet our strategic
objectives. From time to time we may divest certain non-strategic assets in order to provide
liquidity to strengthen our balance sheet or capital to be reinvested in higher rate of return
projects. We cannot assure you that we will be able to sell any of our assets in the future.
Use of Capital: Exploration and Development
Our 2010 capital budget, which includes capitalized interest and general and administrative
costs, is expected to range between $105 million and $110 million, of which approximately $80
million was spent to develop oil and gas properties during the first nine months of 2010. This
represents a significant increase from the capital spending in 2009. Because we operate the
majority of our proved reserves, we expect to be able to control the timing of a substantial
portion of our capital investments. As a result of this flexibility, we plan to actively manage
our 2010 capital budget to stay within our projected cash flow from operations, based upon our
expectations of commodity prices, production rates and capital costs.
However, if commodity prices decline or if actual production or costs vary significantly from
our expectations, our 2010 exploration and development activities could be reduced or could be
financed through a combination of cash on hand or borrowings under the credit facility.
Disclosure Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). All statements other than statements of
historical facts included in and incorporated by reference into this Form 10-Q are forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, trends and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Among
those risks, trends and uncertainties are our ability to find oil and natural gas reserves that are
economically recoverable, the volatility of oil and natural gas prices and the significantly
depressed natural gas prices since the middle of June 2008, the uncertain economic conditions in
the United States and globally, declines in the values of our properties that have resulted and may
in the future result in additional ceiling test write-downs, our ability to replace reserves and
sustain production, our estimate of the sufficiency of our existing capital sources, our ability to
raise additional capital to fund cash requirements for future operations, in prospect development
and property acquisitions or dispositions and in projecting future rates of production or future
reserves, the timing of development expenditures and drilling of wells, hurricanes and other
natural disasters, including the impact of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico on our present and
future operations, and the operating hazards attendant to the oil and gas business. In particular,
careful consideration should be given to cautionary statements made in the various reports the
Company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company undertakes no duty to
update or revise these forward-looking statements.
When used in this Form 10-Q, the words, expect, anticipate, intend, plan, believe,
seek, estimate and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements,
although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Because these
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, actual results could differ materially
from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements for a number of important reasons, including those discussed under Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this
Form 10-Q.
19
Table of Contents
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We experience market risks primarily in two areas: commodity prices and interest rates. Because
our properties are located within the United States, we do not believe that our business operations
are exposed to significant foreign currency exchange risks.
Our revenues are derived from the sale of our crude oil and natural gas production. Based on
projected sales volumes for the fourth quarter of 2010, a 10% change in the prices we receive for
our crude oil and natural gas production would have an approximate $2.5 million impact on our
revenues.
We seek to reduce our exposure to commodity price volatility by hedging a portion of production
through commodity derivative instruments. In the settlement of a typical hedge transaction, we will
have the right to receive from the counterparties to the hedge, the excess of the fixed price
specified in the hedge over a floating price based on a market index, multiplied by the quantity
hedged. If the floating price exceeds the fixed price, we are required to pay the counterparties
this difference multiplied by the quantity hedged. During the quarter and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2010 we received from the counterparties to our derivative instruments $4,550,000 and
$10,837,000, respectively, in connection with net hedge settlements.
We are required to pay the difference between the floating price and the fixed price (when the
floating price exceeds the fixed price) regardless of whether we have sufficient production to
cover the quantities specified in the hedge. Significant reductions in production at times when
the floating price exceeds the fixed price could require us to make payments under the hedge
agreements even though such payments are not offset by sales of production. Hedging will also
prevent us from receiving the full advantage of increases in oil or gas prices above the fixed
amount specified in the hedge.
Our Credit Agreement requires that the counterparties to our hedge contracts be lenders under the
Credit Agreement or, if not a lender under the Credit Agreement, rated A/A2 or higher by S&P or
Moodys. Currently, the counterparties to our existing hedge contracts are lenders under the
Credit Agreement. To the extent we enter into additional hedge contracts, we would expect that
certain of the lenders under the Credit Agreement would serve as counterparties.
As of September 30, 2010, we had entered into the following gas contracts accounted for as cash
flow hedges:
Instrument | Weighted | |||||||||
Production Period | Type | Daily Volumes | Average Price | |||||||
Natural Gas: |
||||||||||
October-December 2010 |
Costless Collar | 40,000 Mmbtu | $ | 5.62 6.27 |
At September 30, 2010, we recognized a net asset of approximately $6.2 million related to the
estimated fair value of these derivative instruments. Based on estimated future commodity prices
as of September 30, 2010, we would realize a $3.9 million gain, net of taxes, as an increase to gas
sales during the fourth quarter of 2010. These gains are expected to be reclassified based on the
schedule of gas volumes stipulated in the derivative contracts.
During October 2010, we entered into the following oil hedge contract accounted for as a cash flow
hedge:
Instrument | Weighted | |||||||||
Production Period | Type | Daily Volumes | Average Price | |||||||
Crude Oil: |
||||||||||
2011 |
Costless Collar | 250 Bbls | $ | 80.00 90.10 |
Although we presently have no borrowings outstanding under our bank credit facility, future
borrowings under such facility would be subject to a floating interest rate. An increase in
interest rates could impact our interest expense to the extent of any future borrowings under our
bank credit facility.
20
Table of Contents
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys management, including its
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, completed an evaluation of the effectiveness
of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded:
i. | that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure (a) that
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and (b) that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure; and |
ii. | that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be no assurance that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures will detect or uncover all failures of persons within the Company and its
consolidated subsidiaries to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in
the Companys periodic reports. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system
of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the
circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.
Changes in Internal Controls
There have been no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting during
the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
NONE.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Oil and natural gas prices are volatile, and natural gas prices have been significantly depressed
since the middle of 2008. An extended decline in the prices of oil and natural gas would likely
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity, ability to meet our financial
obligations and results of operations.
Our future financial condition, revenues, results of operations, profitability and future
growth, and the carrying value of our oil and natural gas properties depend primarily on the prices
we receive for our oil and natural gas production. Our ability to maintain or increase our
borrowing capacity and to obtain additional capital on attractive terms also substantially depends
upon oil and natural gas prices. Prices for natural gas have been significantly depressed since the
middle of 2008 and future oil and natural gas prices are subject to large fluctuations in response
to a variety of factors beyond our control.
These factors include:
| relatively minor changes in the supply of or the demand for oil and natural gas; |
||
| the condition of the United States and worldwide economies; |
||
| market uncertainty; |
||
| the level of consumer product demand; |
||
| weather conditions in the United States, such as hurricanes; |
||
| the actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries; |
21
Table of Contents
| domestic and foreign governmental regulation and taxes, including price controls
adopted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; |
||
| political conditions or hostilities in oil and natural gas producing regions,
including the Middle East and South America; |
||
| the price and level of foreign imports of oil and natural gas; and |
||
| the price and availability of alternate fuel sources. |
We cannot predict future oil and natural gas prices and such prices may decline further. An
extended decline in oil and natural gas prices may adversely affect our financial condition,
liquidity, ability to meet our financial obligations and results of operations. Lower prices have
reduced and may further reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we can produce economically
and has required and may require us to record additional ceiling test write-downs. Substantially
all of our oil and natural gas sales are made in the spot market or pursuant to contracts based on
spot market prices. Our sales are not made pursuant to long-term fixed price contracts.
To attempt to reduce our price risk, we periodically enter into hedging transactions with
respect to a portion of our expected future production. We cannot assure you that such transactions
will reduce the risk or minimize the effect of any decline in oil or natural gas prices. Any
substantial or extended decline in the prices of or demand for oil or natural gas would have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity, ability to meet our financial
obligations and results of operations.
Lower oil and natural gas prices may cause us to record ceiling test write-downs, which could
negatively impact our results of operations.
We use the full cost method of accounting to account for our oil and natural gas operations.
Accordingly, we capitalize the cost to acquire, explore for and develop oil and natural gas
properties. Under full cost accounting rules, the net capitalized costs of oil and natural gas
properties may not exceed a full cost ceiling which is based upon the present value of estimated
future net cash flows from proved reserves, including the effect of hedges in place, discounted at
10%, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of unproved properties. If at the end of any
fiscal period we determine that the net capitalized costs of oil and natural gas properties exceed
the full cost ceiling, we must charge the amount of the excess to earnings in the period then
ended. This is called a ceiling test write-down. This charge does not impact cash flow from
operating activities, but does reduce our net income and stockholders equity. Once incurred, a
write-down of oil and natural gas properties is not reversible at a later date. During 2009, we
recognized $156.1 million in ceiling test write-downs as a result of the decline in commodity
prices.
We review the net capitalized costs of our properties quarterly, using, effective for fiscal
periods ending on or after December 31, 2009, a single price based on the beginning of the month
average of oil and natural gas prices for the prior 12 months. We also assess investments in
unproved properties periodically to determine whether impairment has occurred. The risk that we
will be required to further write down the carrying value of our oil and gas properties increases
when oil and natural gas prices are low or volatile. In addition, write-downs may occur if we
experience substantial downward adjustments to our estimated proved reserves or our unproved
property values, or if estimated future development costs increase. We may experience further
ceiling test write-downs or other impairments in the future. In addition, any future ceiling test
cushion would be subject to fluctuation as a result of acquisition or divestiture activity.
Changes in the regulation of offshore oil and gas exploration in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico as a
result of the April 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico could adversely affect our business.
On April 20, 2010, a fire and explosion occurred onboard the semisubmersible drilling rig Deepwater
Horizon, resulting in a massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. In response to this incident, the
Minerals Management Service (now known as the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and
Enforcement, or the BOEM) of the U.S. Department of the Interior issued a notice on May 30, 2010
implementing a six-month moratorium on certain drilling activities in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. On
July 12, 2010, the BOEM issued a revised moratorium that applied to deep-water drilling operations
that used subsea blowout preventers or surface blowout preventers on floating facilities. This
revised moratorium was lifted on October 12, 2010 after the adoption on September 30, 2010 of new
regulations relating to the design of wells, the testing of the integrity of wellbores, the use of
drilling fluids, the functionality and testing of well control equipment, including blowout
preventers, and other safety matters. Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate impact of
these new regulations, such regulations and any further new guidelines, regulations, legislation or
other steps that the U.S. government or any other governments may implement with respect to
offshore oil and gas exploration in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico could disrupt or delay our operations,
increase the cost of our operations, reduce the area of our operations for drilling rigs, impose
increased liability on our operations or otherwise adversely affect our operations in the U.S. Gulf
of Mexico.
22
Table of Contents
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to repurchases of our common stock
during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
Total Number of | Maximum Number (or | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Approximate Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Purchased as | Value) of Shares that | |||||||||||||||
Part of Publicly | May be Purchased | |||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Average Price | Announced Plan | Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
Shares Purchased (1) | Paid Per Share | or Program | Programs | |||||||||||||
July 1 July 31, 2010 |
1,904 | $ | 6.64 | | | |||||||||||
August 1 August 31, 2010 |
3,426 | 6.19 | | | ||||||||||||
September 1 September 30, 2010 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
5,330 | $ | 6.35 | | |
(1) | All shares repurchased were surrendered by employees to pay tax
withholding upon the vesting of restricted stock awards. |
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
NONE.
Item 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
NONE.
Item 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit 4.1 | First Supplemental Indenture, dated August 19, 2010, among
PetroQuest Energy, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors identified
therein, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19,
2010). |
|
Exhibit 4.2 | Indenture, dated August 19, 2010, between PetroQuest Energy,
Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19,
2010). |
|
Exhibit 4.3 | First Supplemental Indenture, dated August 19, 2010, among
PetroQuest Energy, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors identified
therein, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 19,
2010). |
|
Exhibit 10.1 | Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 5,
2010, among PetroQuest Energy, Inc., PetroQuest Energy,
L.L.C., TDC Energy LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Credit
Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Bank of America,
N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Whitney National Bank
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 6,
2010). |
|
Exhibit 10.2 | Form of Surrender and Cancellation Agreement for Directors
and Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on September 16, 2010). |
|
Exhibit 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13-a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
Exhibit 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13-a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
Exhibit 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
Exhibit 32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
23
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PETROQUEST ENERGY, INC. |
||||
Date: November 4, 2010 | /s/ J. Bond Clement | |||
J. Bond Clement | ||||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
24