As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2010.
Registration No. 333-169980
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia
|
|
6021
|
|
54-2053718 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
999 Waterside Drive, 2nd Floor
Norfolk, Virginia 23510
(757) 217-1000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
John A.B. Davies, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
999 Waterside Drive, 2nd Floor
Norfolk, Virginia 23510
(757) 217-1000
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
|
|
|
Copies of Communications to: |
William A. Old, Jr., Esq.
Williams Mullen
999 Waterside Drive, Suite 1700
Norfolk, Virginia 23510
(757) 622-3366
|
|
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
999 Waterside Drive, 2nd Floor
Norfolk, Virginia 23510
Attention: Douglas J. Glenn
Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Chief Operating Officer
(757) 217-3634 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable
following the effectiveness of this Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or
continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box.
þ
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule
462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities
Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the
earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities
Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the
earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be
necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in
accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this Registration Statement
shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
The information in this Prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not
be sold until the Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This Prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an
offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is
not permitted.
Subject to Completion, dated _ , 2010
PROSPECTUS
Up to 100,000,000 Shares of
Common Stock
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) is the parent company of the sixth largest
Virginia-domiciled commercial bank, Bank of Hampton Roads. Through our network of 60 financial
centers and 72 ATMs, we emphasize personalized customer service and provide a full range of
financial products targeting the needs of individuals and small to medium sized businesses in our
primary market areas, which include Hampton Roads, Virginia, the Northeastern, Southeastern and
Research Triangle regions of North Carolina and Richmond, Virginia.
We are distributing, at no charge, to holders of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share
(the Common Stock), non-transferable subscription rights to purchase up to 100,000,000 shares of
our Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per share in this rights offering (the Rights Offering and
each subscription right, a Right). You will receive one Right for each share of Common Stock
held by you of record as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 29, 2010 (the Record Date, and
each holder of our Common Stock as of the Record Date, an Eligible Shareholder1).
Each Right will entitle you to purchase 2.2698 shares of Common Stock at a subscription price of
$0.40 per share (the Basic Subscription Right) and an over-subscription privilege. If you hold a
Right and fully
|
|
|
1 |
|
As of the Record Date, there were
424,120 outstanding shares of Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. common stock
(held by 492 holders of record) that was deemed by operation of law to
represent shares of Company Common Stock as of Gateways merger with and into
the Company on December 31, 2008. A holder of these shares is also deemed to
be an Eligible Shareholder for the purposes of Rights Offering participation. |
S-2
exercise your Basic Subscription Right, you may also subscribe for an unlimited additional
whole number of common shares pursuant to the over-subscription privilege, subject to availability,
provided that (i) no Eligible Shareholder shall thereby exceed, together with any other person with
whom such shareholder may be aggregated under applicable law, 4.9% beneficial ownership of the
Companys equity securities and (ii) the aggregate purchase price of all common shares purchased in
the Rights Offering shall not exceed $40 million. If the Rights Offering is over-subscribed, we
will allocate the available shares pro rata in proportion to the number of shares of our Common
Stock each of those shareholders owned on the Record Date. For additional details regarding the
pro rata allocation process, see Questions and Answers Relating to the Rights Offering What is
the over-subscription privilege? The Rights Offering will expire at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on
December 10, 2010.
Certain institutional Investors,2 have entered into Investment
Agreements3 with the Company pursuant to which the Investors have agreed to backstop the
Rights Offering by purchasing from us, at the subscription price, any shares not purchased by our
existing stockholders. Please see Questions and Answers Relating to the Offering How does the
backstop commitment work? These commitments are subject to the terms and conditions of
the Investment Agreements. Please see Questions and Answers Relating to the Offering Why are we
conducting the Rights Offering beginning on page S-7 of this Prospectus. This offering is being
made directly by us. We are not using an underwriter or selling agent.
Registrar and Transfer Company is our subscription agent for the Rights Offering.
Our Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol HMPR. On
October 12, 2010, the closing price for our Common Stock was $0.96 per share. Subscription rights
will not be listed for trading on The NASDAQ Global Select Market or any other stock exchange or
market.
Investing in our Common Stock involves risks. You should read the Risk Factors section
beginning on page S-22 before buying shares of our Common Stock.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission or other
regulatory body has approved or disapproved of the Common Stock or determined if this prospectus is
truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
In addition, shares of our Common Stock are not deposit accounts and are not insured or
guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Total (*) |
|
Subscription price |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
40,000,000 |
|
Estimated expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
247,852 |
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
40,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Assumes the issuance of Rights to purchase 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock in the Rights
Offering. Shares of Common Stock relating to those Rights, will either be issued to purchasers
in the Rights Offering or in a private placement to the Investors who are backstopping the Rights
Offering. It is anticipated that delivery of the Rights Offering shares will be made on or about
December 15, 2010.
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
The Investors are affiliates of The Carlyle
Group (Carlyle) and Anchorage Advisors, L.L.C. (Anchorage together with
Carlyle, the Anchor Investors), CapGen Capital Group IV, LP (CapGen),
affiliates of Davidson Kempner Capital Management (Davidson Kempner),
affiliates of Fir Tree, Inc. (Fir Tree), C12 Protium Value Opportunities Ltd.
(C12) and Goldman, Sachs & Co (Goldman). Goldman assigned its right to
purchase Common Stock on September 23, 2010. |
|
3 |
|
The Investment Agreements are the Second
Amended and Restated Investment Agreement, dated August 11, 2010, by and among
the Company and the Anchor Investors, the Amended and Restated CapGen
Investment Agreement, dated August 11, 2010, by and between the Company and
CapGen, certain Second Amended and Restated Securities Purchase Agreements,
dated August 11, 2010, entered into by the Company with Davidson Kempner, Fir
Tree and C12, and the Amended and Restated Goldman Securities Purchase
Agreement, dated, August 11, 2010, by and between the Company and Goldman and
the Assignment and Assumption Agreement by and among Goldman, CapGen , C12 and
the Company, dated September 23, 2010. |
The date of this prospectus is _, 2010.
S-3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
S-4 |
|
|
|
|
S-4 |
|
|
|
|
S-6 |
|
|
|
|
S-15 |
|
|
|
|
S-22 |
|
|
|
|
S-36 |
|
|
|
|
S-39 |
|
|
|
|
S-40 |
|
|
|
|
S-41 |
|
|
|
|
S-43 |
|
|
|
|
S-45 |
|
|
|
|
S-48 |
|
|
|
|
S-63 |
|
|
|
|
S-83 |
|
|
|
|
S-84 |
|
|
|
|
S-89 |
|
|
|
|
S-96 |
|
|
|
|
S-115 |
|
|
|
|
S-124 |
|
|
|
|
S-130 |
|
|
|
|
S-134 |
|
|
|
|
S-134 |
|
|
|
|
S-134 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS
You should only rely on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized
anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this prospectus. We are
offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our Common Stock only in jurisdictions where
offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as
of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any
sale of Common Stock.
In this prospectus, we frequently use the terms we, our and us to refer to Hampton Roads
Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries. To understand the offering fully and for a more complete
description of the offering you should read this entire document carefully, including particularly
the Risk Factors section beginning on page S-22.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) allows us to incorporate by
reference the information that we file with it, which means that we can disclose important
information to you by
referring you to other documents. The information incorporated by reference is an important
part of this Prospectus. We incorporate by reference the following documents (other than
information furnished rather than filed):
S-4
|
|
|
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009, as amended; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys Quarterly Reports on Forms 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March
31, 2010, as amended, June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys Current Reports on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2010, February 10,
2010, February 17, 2010, April 7, 2010, April 23, 2010 (two (2) separate Current
Reports on Form 8-K were filed on this day), May 19, 2010, May 24, 2010, May 27,
2010, June 7, 2010 (two (2) separate Current Reports on Form 8-K were filed on this
day), June 10, 2010 (as amended on June 11, 2010), June 14, 2010 (two (2) separate
Current Reports on Form 8-K were filed on this day), June 17, 2010, July 1, 2010,
July 7, 2010, July 12, 2010, July 13, 2010, July 27, 2010, August 10, 2010 (two (2)
separate Current Reports on Form 8-K were filed on this day), August 12, 2010, August
17, 2010, August 18, 2010; August 30, 2010, September 14, 2010, September 17, 2010,
September 23, 2010, September 24, 2010, September 28, 2010, September 30, 2010,
October 4, 2010, October 5, 2010, October 13, 2010, October 25, 2010, October 29,
2010, November 1, 2010, November 2, 2010 and November 4, 2010 (other than the
portions of those documents furnished or not otherwise deemed to be filed); |
|
|
|
|
the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement related to its 2010 annual meeting of
shareholders, as filed with the SEC on August 30, 2010; and |
|
|
|
|
the description of our Common Stock set forth in our Registration Statement on
Form 8-A filed August 2, 2006 pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act,
including any amendment or report filed with the SEC for the purpose of updating this
description. |
We will provide without charge, upon written or oral request, a copy of any or all of the
documents that are incorporated by reference into this Prospectus and a copy of any or all other
contracts or documents which are referred to in this Prospectus. Requests should be directed to:
Douglas J. Glenn, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Chief Operating Officer at Hampton
Roads Bankshares, Inc., 999 Waterside Dr., Suite 200, Norfolk, Virginia 23510.
S-5
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS RELATING TO THE OFFERING
The following are examples of what we anticipate will be common questions about the
offering. The answers are based on selected information included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
following questions and answers do not contain all of the information that may be important to you
and may not address all of the questions that you may have about the offering. This prospectus and
the documents incorporated by reference into this prospectus contain more detailed descriptions of
the terms and conditions of the offering and provide additional information about us and our
business, including potential risks related to the offering, the shares of our Common Stock offered
hereby and our business.
What is the Rights Offering?
We are distributing, at no charge, to holders of our shares of Common Stock, non-transferable
subscription rights to purchase shares of our Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per whole share.
You will receive such rights if you owned Common Stock as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September
29, 2010, the Record Date. Each subscription right consists of a Basic Subscription Right and an
over-subscription privilege, as described below. You will receive one subscription right for each
share of Common Stock that you owned on the Record Date.
What is the Basic Subscription Right?
The Basic Subscription Right gives our shareholders the opportunity to purchase 2.2698 new
shares of Common Stock for each existing share of Common Stock owned on the Record Date at a
subscription price of $0.40 per share. You may exercise your subscription rights, or you may
choose not to exercise any subscription rights at all. We will issue a total of 100,000,000 shares
of Common Stock in the Rights Offering, including any shares purchased pursuant to the backstop
commitment.
If you hold a Hampton Roads Bankshares stock certificate, the number of shares you may
purchase pursuant to your Basic Subscription Rights is indicated on the enclosed rights
certificate. If you hold your shares in the name of a broker, dealer, custodian bank or other
nominee who uses the services of the Depository Trust Company (DTC), you will not receive a
rights certificate. Instead, DTC will issue one subscription right to your nominee record holder
for each share of our Common Stock that you beneficially own as of the Record Date. If you are not
contacted by your nominee, you should contact your nominee as soon as possible.
May I subscribe for more than I am entitled to under the Basic Subscription Right?
If you purchase all of the shares available to you pursuant to your Basic Subscription Rights,
you may also choose to purchase a portion of any shares that other shareholders do not purchase by
exercising their Basic Subscription Rights. You should indicate on your rights certificate, or the
form provided by your nominee if your shares are held in the name of a nominee, how many additional
shares you would like to purchase pursuant to your over-subscription privilege.
What is the over-subscription privilege?
If you purchase all of the shares available to you pursuant to your Basic Subscription Rights,
you may also choose to exercise your over-subscription privilege by purchasing a portion of any
shares that other shareholders do not purchase by exercising their Basic Subscription Rights. You
should indicate on your rights certificate, or the form provided by your nominee if your shares are
held in the name of a
nominee, how many additional shares you would like to purchase pursuant to your
over-subscription privilege.
S-6
If sufficient shares are available for offer pursuant to the Rights Offering, we will seek to
honor the over-subscription requests in full.
If over-subscription requests exceed the number of shares available, however, we will allocate
the available shares pro rata among the shareholders exercising the over-subscription privilege in
proportion to the number of shares of our Common Stock each of those shareholders owned on the
Record Date, relative to the number of shares owned on the Record Date by all shareholders
exercising the over-subscription privilege. If this pro rata allocation results in any shareholder
receiving a greater number of shares than the shareholder subscribed for pursuant to the exercise
of the over-subscription privilege, then such shareholder will be allocated only that number of
shares for which the shareholder oversubscribed, and the remaining shares will be allocated among
all other shareholders exercising the over-subscription privilege on the same pro rata basis
described above. The proration process will be repeated until all shares have been allocated.
Registrar and Transfer Company, our subscription agent for the Rights Offering, will determine
the over-subscription allocation based on the formula described above.
Are there any limits on the number of shares I may purchase in the Rights Offering?
Eligible Shareholders have the right to purchase 2.2698 shares of Common Stock for each share
of Common Stock owned. If you hold a Right and fully exercise your Basic Subscription Rights, you
may also subscribe for an unlimited additional whole number of common shares, subject to
availability, provided that (i) no Eligible Shareholder shall thereby exceed, together with any
other person with whom such shareholder may be aggregated under applicable law, 4.9% beneficial
ownership of the Companys equity securities and (ii) the aggregate purchase price of all Common
Stock purchased in the Rights Offering shall not exceed $40 million. If the Rights Offering is
over-subscribed, we will allocate the available shares pro rata in proportion to the number of
shares of our Common Stock each of those shareholders owned on the Record Date, in the manner
discussed in the question immediately above.
Will fractional shares be issued in the Rights Offering?
No. Fractional shares resulting from the Basic Subscription Right or the over-subscription
privilege will be eliminated by rounding down to the nearest whole shares.
Why are we conducting the Rights Offering?
Like many financial institutions across the United States, we have been affected by
deteriorating economic conditions and related financial losses. The report of our independent
registered public accounting firm on our consolidated financial statements, as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2009 and for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, contained an
explanatory paragraph regarding the uncertainty of our ability to continue as a going concern.
Under our written agreement with our regulators, we are required to raise additional capital.
Due to the Great Recession, and the deterioration of the regulatory capital of Bank of Hampton
Roads, we have pursued strategic alternatives to raise capital and strengthen our balance sheet
over the past year. Following the withdrawal of the Companys underwritten public offering of
Common Stock in August 2009, the Board of Directors worked closely with management and the
Companys advisors to
evaluate potential alternatives for raising additional capital, including possibly selling
common or preferred stock in public or private offerings, issuing subordinated debt and/or
warrants, disposing of branches or related assets, trading deposits or loans, and considering other
strategic alternatives.
As a result, the Investors and the Company entered into the various definitive Investment
Agreements to purchase 637,500,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company for $0.40 per share as
part of an aggregate $255 million private placement (the Private Placement), in two separate
closings. The Company is required to conduct the Rights Offering under the terms of the Investment
Agreements.
S-7
The initial closing (the First Closing) related to the issuance of $235 million worth
of Common Stock occurred on September 30, 2010, following shareholder approval at the Companys
2010 annual meeting of shareholders held on September 28, 2010 (the Annual Meeting) and upon the
exchange of 80,347 shares of Series C preferred stock held by the United States Department of the
Treasury (the Treasury) for newly-created shares of Series C-1 preferred stock (the TARP
Exchange) and subsequent conversion of such Series C-1 preferred shares into 52,225,550 shares of
Common Stock (the TARP Conversion), the exchange of Series A and B preferred for up to 22,806,000
shares of Common Stock (the Exchange Offers), and approval of an amendment to the preferred stock
designations (the Preferred Amendments).
The second closing for an additional $20 million from the Investors (the Second Closing and
collectively with the First Closing, the Closings) will occur contemporaneously with the closing
of the Rights Offering and the satisfaction or waiver of the other closing conditions as described
in the Investment Agreements.
Under the terms of the Investment Agreements, the Company is required to conduct this Rights
Offering as promptly as practicable after the First Closing.
The transactions described above are part of the Companys Recapitalization Plan which
includes the Private Placement, Rights Offering, Exchange Offers, TARP Exchange, TARP Conversion, a
reverse stock split4 and Preferred Amendments. The issuance of Common Stock under the
Recapitalization Plan and other authorizations were unanimously approved by the Board of Directors,
and subsequently, the common shareholders at the Annual Meeting. The requisite amount of Series A
and B preferred shareholders also approved the Preferred Amendments on that date.
Summaries of the material terms of the Investment Agreements are qualified in their entirety
by reference to the full text of each document. Copies of the Investment Agreements and ancillary
documents are attached as Exhibits 10.1-10.9 to our Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2010, and Exhibit
10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 23, 2010, which are
incorporated by reference herein.
The transactions comprising our Recapitalization Plan are expected to return both Bank of Hampton
Roads and the Company to significantly above well-capitalized status. As of September 30, 2010,
as a result of the First Closing, the Company and its subsidiaries were well-capitalized under
applicable regulatory guidance. We will use the proceeds received from the Rights Offering and the
additional proceeds to be received in the Second Closing to capitalize our subsidiary banks and for other
general corporate purposes.
How was the subscription price determined?
We established a Special Committee of the Board of Directors, comprised of Patrick E. Corbin,
Jordan E. Slone, and former director Bobby L. Ralph. The price of the shares offered in the Rights
Offering was determined by the Special Committee and is based on a variety of factors, including,
the desire to provide all existing shareholders with the opportunity to purchase additional shares
at the same
|
|
|
4 |
|
The decision to implement a reverse stock
split will not be made until after the other transactions contemplated by the
Recapitalization Plan have been completed (the Reverse Stock Split). For a
detailed discussion regarding the Companys plans with respect to the Reverse
Stock Split, see the section of the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A, filed on August 30, 2010 entitled Proposal No. 8: Approval of an
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to Effect a Reverse Stock Split of
Common Stock. |
S-8
price paid by Investors in the Private Placement, the need to offer the shares at a
price that would be attractive to investors relative to the then current trading price for our
Common Stock, historical and current trading prices for our Common Stock, general conditions in the
financial services industry, the need for capital and alternatives available to us for raising
capital and potential market conditions. In conjunction with its review of these factors, the
Special Committee also reviewed our history and prospects, including our past and present earnings,
our prospects for future earnings, the outlook for our industry and our current financial condition
and regulatory status.
The subscription price does not necessarily bear any relationship to any other established
criteria for value. You should not consider the subscription price as an indication of value of the
Company or our Common Stock. You should not assume or expect that, after the offering, our shares
of Common Stock will trade at or above the subscription price in any given time period. The market
price of our Common Stock may decline during or after the offering, and you may not be able to sell
the underlying shares of our Common Stock purchased during the offering at a price equal to or
greater than the subscription price. You should obtain a current quote for our Common Stock before
exercising your subscription rights and make your own assessment of our business and financial
condition, our prospects for the future, and the terms of this offering.
Am I required to exercise my subscription rights I receive in the Rights Offering?
No. You may exercise your subscription rights or you may choose not to exercise any
subscription rights. If you do not exercise any subscription rights, the number of shares of our
Common Stock you own will not change as a result of the Rights Offering. However, if you choose
not to exercise your subscription rights, your ownership interest in the Company will be diluted to
the extent other shareholders exercise their subscription rights, and your voting and other rights
in the Company will likewise be diluted.
How soon must I act to exercise my subscription rights?
If you received a rights certificate and elect to exercise any or all of your subscription
rights, the subscription agent must receive your completed and signed rights certificate and
payment, including final clearance of any uncertified check, before the Rights Offering expires on
December 10, 2010, at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time. If you hold your shares in the name of a broker,
dealer, custodian bank or other nominee, your nominee may establish an earlier deadline before the
expiration of the Rights Offering by which you must provide it with your instructions to exercise
your subscription rights. Although our Board of Directors may, in its discretion, extend the
expiration date of the Rights Offering, we currently do not intend to do so. Our Board of
Directors may cancel the Rights Offering at any time to the extent permitted by the Investment
Agreements. If we cancel the Rights Offering, all subscription payments received will be returned
promptly, without interest or penalty.
Although we will make reasonable attempts to provide this prospectus to our shareholders, the
Rights Offering and all subscription rights will expire on the expiration date, whether or not we
have been able to locate each person entitled to subscription rights.
May I transfer my subscription rights?
No. You may not sell, transfer or assign your subscription rights to anyone. Subscription
rights will not be listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market or any other stock
exchange or market. Rights certificates may be completed only by the shareholder who receives the
certificate.
S-9
Are we requiring a minimum overall subscription from existing shareholders to complete the
offering?
No. We are not requiring an overall minimum subscription to complete the offering. However,
subject to the terms of the Investment Agreements, the Investors have agreed to backstop the Rights
Offering by purchasing from us, at the subscription price, any shares not purchased by our existing
stockholders. See Questions and Answers Relating to the Offering How does the backstop
commitment work?
Can the Board of Directors cancel or extend the offering?
Yes. Subject to the terms of the Investment Agreements, our board of directors may decide to
cancel the Rights Offering before the closing of the offering to the extent permitted by the
Investment Agreements. If our Board of Directors cancels the Rights Offering, any money received
from subscribing shareholders will be returned promptly, without interest or penalty. If we cancel
the Rights Offering, we will not be obligated to issue shares of our Common Stock to holders who
have exercised their subscription rights prior to termination. We also have the right to extend
the offering for additional periods, although we do not currently intend to do so.
Have the Board of Directors or the Investors made a recommendation to shareholders regarding the
Rights Offering?
No. Neither our Board of Directors nor the Investors are making a recommendation regarding
your exercise of the subscription rights, although our Board of Directors has determined that
conducting the Rights Offering is in the best interests of the Company. Shareholders who exercise
subscription rights will incur investment risk on new money invested. We cannot predict the price
at which our shares of Common Stock will trade after the offering. The market price for our Common
Stock may decrease to an amount below the subscription price, and if you purchase shares at the
subscription price, you may not be able to sell the underlying shares of our Common Stock in the
future at the same price or a higher price. You should make your decision based on your assessment
of our business and financial condition, our prospects for the future, the terms of the Rights
Offering and the information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this prospectus. See
Risk Factors for a discussion of some of the risks involved in investing in our shares of Common
Stock.
Will our directors and executive officers participate in the Rights Offering?
To the extent they held shares of Common Stock as of the Record Date, our directors and
officers are entitled to participate in the Rights Offering on the same terms and conditions
applicable to all shareholders. We believe such directors and executive officers will participate
in the Rights Offering at varying levels, but they are not required to do so.
How do I exercise my subscription rights if I own shares in certificate form?
If you hold a Common Stock certificate and you wish to participate in the Rights Offering, you
must deliver a properly completed and signed rights certificate, together with payment of the
purchase price, to the subscription agent before 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on December 10, 2010. If
you send an uncertified check, payment will not be deemed to have been delivered to the
subscription agent until the check has cleared. In certain cases, you may be required to provide
signature guarantees.
Please follow the delivery instructions on the rights certificate. Do not deliver documents to
the Company. You are solely responsible for completing delivery to the subscription agent of your
subscription documents, rights certificate and payment. You should allow sufficient time for
delivery of your subscription materials to the subscription agent so that the subscription agent
receives them by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on December 10, 2010.
S-10
If you send a payment that is insufficient to purchase the number of shares you requested, or
if the number of shares you requested is not specified in the forms, the payment received will be
applied to exercise your subscription rights to the fullest extent possible based on the amount of
the payment received, subject to the availability of shares under the over-subscription privilege
and the elimination of fractional shares.
What should I do if I want to participate in the Rights Offering but my shares are held in the name
of a broker, dealer, custodian bank or other nominee?
If you hold your shares of Common Stock through a broker, dealer, custodian bank or other
nominee, then your nominee is the record holder of the shares you own. The record holder must
exercise the subscription rights on your behalf. If you wish to purchase our Common Stock through
the Rights Offering, you should contact your broker, dealer, custodian bank or nominee as soon as
possible. Please follow the instructions of your nominee. Your nominee may establish an earlier
deadline before the expiration date of the Rights Offering.
What form of payment is required to purchase our common shares?
As described in the instructions accompanying the rights certificate, payments submitted to
the subscription agent must be made in U.S. currency, by one of the following two methods:
|
|
by an uncertified check drawn upon a U.S. bank payable to Registrar and Transfer Company
as rights agent for Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., or |
|
|
by wire transfer of immediately available funds at the following account: ABA No.
031-201-360, further credit to Account No. 276-053-5977 at TD Bank, 6000 Atrium
Way, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054, with an account name of Registrar and Transfer
Company as rights agent for Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Any wire transfer should clearly
indicate the identity of the subscriber who is paying the Subscription Price by wire transfer. |
Payments will be deemed to have been received upon (i) clearance of any uncertified check, or
(ii) receipt of collected funds in the account designated above. If paying by uncertified check,
please note
that the funds paid thereby may take five or more business days to clear. Accordingly, Rights
holders who wish to pay the subscription price by means of uncertified check are urged to make
payment sufficiently in advance of the expiration time to ensure that such payment is received and
clears by such date.
If you hold your shares in the name of a broker, dealer, custodian bank or other nominee,
separate payment instructions may apply. Please contact your nominee, if applicable, for further
payment instructions.
When will I receive my new shares?
If you purchase Common Stock in the Rights Offering, you will receive your new shares as soon
as practicable after the Rights Offering closes. We anticipate that the offering will close on or
about December 10, 2010.
After I send in my payment and rights certificate to the subscription agent, may I cancel my
exercise of subscription rights?
No. All exercises of subscription rights are irrevocable unless the Rights Offering is
cancelled by the Company, even if you later learn information that you consider to be unfavorable
to the exercise of your subscription rights. You should not exercise your subscription rights
unless you are certain that you wish to purchase shares at the subscription price of $0.40 per
share.
S-11
What effects will the offering have on our outstanding Common Stock?
As a result of the Rights Offering, an additional 100,000,000 shares of our Common Stock will
be issued and outstanding after the closing of the Rights Offering, including Investor purchases
pursuant to the backstop. As a result of the Rights Offering and backstop (if applicable), subject
to the terms of the Investment Agreements and conditions of the backstop, the ownership interests
and voting interests of the existing shareholders that do not fully exercise their Basic
Subscription Rights will be diluted.
In addition, if the subscription price of the shares is less than the market price of our
Common Stock it will likely reduce the market price per share of shares you already hold.
How much will the Company receive from the offering and how will such proceeds be used?
We estimate that the net proceeds to us from the Rights Offering (including the full exercise
of the backstop, if necessary), after deducting estimated offering expenses, will be approximately
$39.9 million. We intend to use the net proceeds from the offering (including the possible
backstop) to make capital contributions to our subsidiary banks and for other general corporate
purposes.
Are there risks in exercising my subscription rights?
Yes. The exercise of your subscription rights involves risks. Exercising your subscription
rights involves the purchase of additional shares of Common Stock and you should consider this
investment as carefully as you would consider any other investment. Among other things, you should
carefully consider the risks described under the heading Risk
Factors beginning on page S-22 of
this Prospectus and in the documents incorporated by reference into this prospectus.
If the Rights Offering is not completed, will my subscription payment be refunded to me?
Yes. The subscription agent will hold all funds it receives in a segregated bank account until
completion of the offering. If we do not complete the offering, all subscription payments received
by the subscription agent will be returned promptly, without interest or penalty. If you own shares
in street name, it may take longer for you to receive your subscription payment because the
subscription agent will return payments through the record holder of your shares.
What fees or charges apply if I purchase shares in the Rights Offering?
We are not charging any fee or sales commission to issue subscription rights to you or to
issue shares to you if you exercise your subscription rights. If you exercise your subscription
rights through a broker, dealer, custodian bank or other nominee, you are responsible for paying
any fees your record holder may charge you.
What are the U.S. federal income tax consequences of exercising my subscription rights?
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, you should not recognize income or loss in connection
with the receipt or exercise of subscription rights in the Rights Offering. You should consult your
tax advisor as to your particular tax consequences resulting from the Rights Offering. For a
detailed discussion, see Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.
S-12
To whom should I send my forms and payment?
If your shares are held in the name of a broker, dealer, custodian bank or other nominee, then
you should send your subscription documents and subscription payment to that record holder. If you
are the record holder, then you should send your subscription documents, rights certificate and
subscription payment by mail, hand delivery or overnight courier to:
Registrar and Transfer Company
10 Commerce Drive Cranford, NJ 07016
Attn. Reorg/Exchange Department
Telephone Number for Confirmation:
(800) 368-5948 (toll free)
Telephone Number for Information:
(800) 368-5948 (toll free)
Email Address for Information:
info@rtco.com
You or, if applicable, your nominee are solely responsible for completing delivery to
the subscription agent of your subscription documents, rights certificate and payment. You should
allow sufficient time for delivery of your subscription materials to the subscription agent and
clearance of payment before the expiration of the Rights Offering at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on
December 10, 2010.
Who are there backstop purchasers?
The Investors in the Private Placement are the backstop purchasers.
How does the backstop commitment work?
Subject to the terms of the Investment Agreements, the Investors have collectively agreed to
purchase from us, at $0.40 per share, all of the shares of Common Stock offered pursuant to the
Rights Offering that are not issued pursuant to the exercise of Rights.
In the event the Company does not sell at least $20 million in common shares pursuant to the
Rights Offering, CapGen has agreed to purchase, at $0.40 per share, the number of common shares in
an aggregate dollar amount equal to $20 million less the dollar amount of common shares sold
pursuant to the exercise of Rights. In addition, in the event that the Company sells at least $20
million but less than $40 million in common shares pursuant to the Rights Offering, Carlyle,
Anchorage, CapGen, Fir Tree, Davidson Kempner, and C12 have agreed to purchase, on a pro rata
basis, at $0.40 per share, the number of common shares in an aggregate dollar amount equal to less
than $40 million less the dollar amount of common shares sold pursuant to the exercise of Rights.
In no event shall the Investors be required to purchase shares in the backstop in excess of
their respective pro rata basis or such as would cause Carlyle, Anchorage or CapGen to hold more
than 24.9% of the Companys outstanding common shares or cause Fir Tree, Davidson Kempner or C12 to
hold more than 9.9% of the Companys outstanding common shares. To the extent the Rights Offering
is not fully sold following the purchases by the Eligible Shareholders and the investors, the
Company may offer any remaining unsubscribed shares at $0.40 per share.
Why are there backstop purchasers?
We obtained the backstop commitment to ensure that, subject to the conditions of the backstop
commitment, all shares are either distributed in the Rights Offering or purchased subsequent to the
offering at the same purchase price at which the Rights were exercisable. Through this
arrangement, we have a greater degree of certainty that we will raise gross proceeds of $40 million
through the Rights Offering and the backstop commitment.
S-13
Whom should I contact if I have other questions?
If you have any questions regarding the Company, the Rights Offering, completing a rights
certificate or submitting payment in the Rights Offering, please contact our information agent for
the Rights Offering: Douglas J. Glenn, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Chief
Operating Officer at Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., 999 Waterside Dr., Suite 200, Norfolk,
Virginia 23510 at (757) 217-3634.
S-14
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
The following summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this Prospectus
and in the documents incorporated by reference in this Prospectus and does not contain all the
information you will need in making your investment decision. You should read carefully this entire
Prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference in this Prospectus before making your
investment decisions.
HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
Company Overview
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. is the parent company of the sixth largest Virginia-domiciled
commercial bank, Bank of Hampton Roads. Through our network of 60 financial centers and 72 ATMs,
we emphasize personalized customer service and provide a full range of financial products targeting
the needs of individuals and small to medium sized businesses in our primary market areas, which
include Hampton Roads, Virginia, the Northeastern, Southeastern and Research Triangle regions of
North Carolina and Richmond, Virginia.
Our principal business is to attract deposits and to loan or invest those deposits on
profitable terms. We offer all traditional loan and deposit banking services, as well as telephone
banking, internet banking, remote deposit capture, and debit cards. We accept both commercial and
consumer deposits. These deposits are in varied forms of both demand and time accounts, including
checking accounts, interest checking, money market accounts, savings accounts, certificates of
deposit, and IRA accounts.
We complement our core banking operations by offering a wide range of services through our
various non-banking subsidiaries, which include Hampton Roads Investments, Inc., which provides
securities, brokerage and investment advisory services, Shore Investments, Inc., which provides
securities brokerage and investment advisory services, Gateway Insurance Services, Inc., which
provides insurance brokerage services, Gateway Investment Services, Inc., which provides investment
advisory services, Gateway Bank Mortgage, Inc., which provides mortgage brokerage services, and
Gateway Title Agency, Inc., which offers real property title insurance and real property settlement
services.
At September 30, 2010, we had total consolidated assets of approximately $3.07 billion, net
total loans of $1.94 billion, total deposits of $2.59 billion, and consolidated shareholders
equity of approximately $168.5 million.
We currently have two banking subsidiariesBank of Hampton Roads and Shore Bank, which operate
60 financial centers located throughout Virginia, North Carolina and Maryland. Of these financial
centers, 24 operate by trade name as Gateway Bank, 28 as Bank of Hampton Roads, and eight as Shore
Bank. On June 1, 2008, the Company acquired Shore Financial Corporation (Shore), and on
December 31, 2008, the Company acquired Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc (Gateway).
The Company is a bank holding company organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia
and is registered under the federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. The Company was incorporated
on February 28, 2001, primarily to serve as a holding company for Bank of Hampton Roads. Bank of
Hampton Roads is a Virginia chartered bank that was incorporated in March, 1987.
Our Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker symbol HMPR.
Our principal executive offices are located at 999 Waterside Drive, Suite 200, Norfolk, Virginia
23510 and our telephone number is (757) 217-1000. Our internet address is
http://www.hamptonroadsbanksharesinc.com. The information contained on our web site is not part of
this Prospectus.
S-15
Recent Developments
Appointment of New Auditors
On October 7, 2010, the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors dismissed Yount,
Hyde & Barbour, P.C. as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. On the same
date, following a comprehensive search process initiated by the Company, the Audit Committee
appointed KPMG LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. See the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 13, 2010, which is incorporated herein by
reference.
Changes to the Companys Board of Directors
Effective September 30, 2010, Emil A. Viola retired from the Companys Board of Directors.
In addition, effective September 30, 2010, in connection with the First Closing of the Private
Placement, the following members of the Companys Board of Directors resigned: William Brumsey,
III, Herman A. Hall, III, Robert R. Kinser, Bobby L. Ralph, Roland Carroll Smith, Sr., Ollin B.
Sykes, Frank T. Williams, and Jerry T. Womack. Effective October 4, 2010, Richard F. Hall, III
also resigned from the Companys Board of Directors as contemplated under the terms of the
Investment Agreements.
On September 30, 2010, the Company appointed Randal K. Quarles to its Board of Directors. Mr.
Quarles was designated to the Companys Board of Directors by an affiliate of Carlyle pursuant to
the terms of the Investment Agreements.
Also on September 30, 2010, the Company appointed Hal F. Goltz to its Board of Directors. Mr.
Goltz was designated to the Companys Board of Directors by an affiliate of Anchorage pursuant to
the terms of the Investment Agreements.
On October 4, 2010, the Company appointed Robert B. Goldstein to its Board of Directors. Mr.
Goldstein was designated to the Companys Board of Directors by an affiliate of CapGen pursuant to
the terms of the Investment Agreements.
Implementation of Initial Portion our Recapitalization Plan
On August 11, 2010, the Investors and the Company entered into the Investment Agreements to
purchase 637,500,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company for $0.40 per share as part of the
Private Placement. Since then, the following events have taken place in furtherance of the
Companys Recapitalization Plan:
|
|
|
On September 28, 2010, the Companys common shareholders approved the issuance of Common
Stock in the Private Placement and the Rights Offering and other matters presented at the
Annual Meeting, including the Preferred Amendments, and holders of the Companys Series A
and B preferred shareholders approved the Preferred Amendments at a special meeting of such
preferred shareholders. |
|
|
|
On September 28, 2010, the Company amended its Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation, as amended (the Articles of Incorporation), to increase the amount of
Common Stock authorized for issuance by 900,000,000 shares, from 100,000,000 to
1,000,000,000 shares. |
|
|
|
As reported in the Companys Amendment No. 2 to its Schedule TO, filed on October 1,
2010 (the Amended Schedule TO), on September 29, 2010, the Company exchanged the amount
of newly-issued shares of Common Stock described therein for previously outstanding shares
of Series A and B preferred stock tendered in such exchange offers. The information
contained in the Amended Schedule TO is incorporated herein by reference. |
S-16
|
|
|
On September 30, 2010, the Company sent irrevocable conversion notices to the holders of
all remaining shares of Series A and Series B preferred stock. Upon conversion, each share
of Series A and Series B preferred stock was automatically cancelled and converted into the
right to receive 375 common shares upon delivery of the Series A and Series B preferred
stock certificates to the Company, for an aggregate issuance of 900,000 common shares. |
|
|
|
On September 30, 2010, the Company exchanged 80,347 shares of Series C preferred stock
held by the Treasury for newly-created shares of Series C-1 preferred stock and converted
such shares of Series C-1 preferred stock into 52,225,550 shares of Common Stock, pursuant
to an Exchange Agreement with Treasury (the Exchange Agreement). |
|
|
|
On September 30, 2010, the Company issued $235 million worth of common shares, or
587,500,000 shares, at a price of $0.40 per share in the following amounts to the following
entities. |
|
|
|
Registered Name |
|
Number of Shares Issued |
Carlyle Financial Services Harbor, L.P.
|
|
164,956,965 |
|
|
|
ACMO-HR, L.L.C.
|
|
153,020,190 |
|
|
|
CapGen Capital Group VI LP
|
|
114,223,775 |
|
|
|
M.H. Davidson & Co.
|
|
1,561,302 |
|
|
|
Davidson Kempner Partners
|
|
10,869,716 |
|
|
|
Davidson Kempner Institutional Partners, L.P.
|
|
21,988,770 |
|
|
|
Davidson Kempner International, Ltd.
|
|
25,336,954 |
|
|
|
Davidson Kempner Distressed Opportunities
International, Ltd.
|
|
5,797,326 |
|
|
|
Davidson Kempner Distressed Opportunities Funds LP
|
|
2,720,467 |
|
|
|
Fir Tree Value Master Fund, L.P.
|
|
45,193,824 |
|
|
|
Fir Tree REOF II Master Fund, LLC
|
|
23,080,711 |
|
|
|
C12 Protium Value Opportunities Ltd.
|
|
18,750,000 |
|
|
|
TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES
|
|
587,500,000 |
|
|
|
On September 30, 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase Common Stock described in
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010, to each of the following
entities: Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C, ACMO-HR, L.L.C. and CapGen Capital Group VI
LP. The information contained in that current report is incorporated herein by reference. |
S-17
Restatement of Year End and First Quarter Financial Statements
On August 10, 2010, the Company announced that it would restate its financial statements for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the
Restatements). Management, the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors of the Company
determined that they should provide for an increase in the valuation allowance against the
Companys deferred tax asset of approximately $56 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
$14.3 million for the period ended March 31, 2010. This resulted in an increase in the Companys
losses by approximately $56 million for the period ended December 31, 2009 and $14.3 million for
the period ended March 31, 2010. The allowance does not affect the Companys cash or liquidity in
any way. The Restatements were filed on August 13, 2010. See Amendment No. 2 to the Companys
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed by the Company with the SEC on August 13,
2010 and Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, filed by
the Company with the SEC on August 13, 2010.
S-18
The Rights Offering
|
|
|
Securities Offered
|
|
We are distributing at no charge to record holders of our Common Stock
as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the record date of September 29, 2010, one non-transferable
subscription right for each share of Common Stock then held of record. For each subscription
right that you own, you will have a Basic Subscription Right to buy from us 2.2698
shares of our Common Stock at a subscription price of $0.40 per share and an
over-subscription privilege. |
|
|
|
Subscription Price
|
|
The subscription price is $0.40 per share of Common Stock, which was determined
through a Special Committee of the Board of Directors. See Questions and Answers Relating to
the Offering How was the subscription price determined? |
|
|
|
Subscription Right
|
|
Each subscription right consists of a Basic Subscription Right and an
over-subscription privilege. |
|
|
|
Basic Subscription Right
|
|
For each subscription right that you own, you will have a Basic
Subscription Right to buy from us 2.2698 shares of Common Stock at the subscription
price. You may exercise your Basic Subscription Right for some or all of your subscription
rights, or you may choose not to exercise any of your Basic Subscription Rights. |
|
|
|
Over-subscription Privilege
|
|
Holders who purchase all of the shares available to them pursuant
to their Basic Subscription Rights may also choose to exercise their over-subscription
privilege by purchasing a portion of any shares that other shareholders do not purchase by
exercising their Basic Subscription Rights. If the Rights Offering is over-subscribed, we
will allocate the available shares pro rata in proportion to the number of shares of our
Common Stock each of those shareholders owned on the Record Date. For additional details
regarding the pro rata allocation process, see Questions and Answers Relating to the Rights
Offering What is the over-subscription privilege? |
|
|
|
No Fractional Shares
|
|
Fractional shares resulting from the exercise of the Basic
Subscription Rights and the over-subscription privileges will be eliminated by rounding down
to the nearest whole share. |
|
|
|
Record Date
|
|
September 29, 2010 |
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
The subscription rights will expire at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on December
10, 2010, unless the expiration date is extended. We reserve the right to extend the
subscription rights period at our sole discretion. |
S-19
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding
|
|
As of November 10, 2010, we had
684,680,995 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
Assuming the sale of all 100,000,000 shares in the Rights Offering, we would have 784,680,352
shares outstanding upon the completion of the offering. |
|
|
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
Our gross proceeds from the offering will be approximately $40 million (before
offering expenses). We intend to use the net proceeds from the offering and any sale of shares
of Common Stock to the Investors through their backstop commitment to make capital
contributions to our subsidiary banks and for other general corporate purposes. Please see
Use of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
Procedure for Exercising
Subscription Rights
|
|
To exercise your subscription rights, you must take the following steps: |
|
|
|
|
|
If you are a registered holder of Common Stock, you may deliver
payment and a properly completed rights certificate to the
subscription agent before December 10, 2010, at 5:00 p.m., Eastern
Time. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you are a beneficial owner of shares that are registered in the
name of a broker, dealer, custodian bank or other nominee, your
broker, dealer, custodian bank or other nominee must exercise your
subscription rights on your behalf and deliver all documents and
payments before December 10, 2010, at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time. |
|
|
|
Non-Transferability of Subscription
Rights
|
|
The subscription rights may not be sold, transferred or assigned to anyone else and will not
be listed for trading on NASDAQ or any other stock exchange or market. |
|
|
|
No Revocation
|
|
All exercises of subscription rights are irrevocable, even if you later learn
information that you consider to be unfavorable to the exercise of your subscription rights.
You should not exercise your subscription rights unless you are certain that you wish to
purchase additional shares of Common Stock at a subscription price of $0.40 per share. |
|
|
|
No Board or Investor
Recommendation
|
|
Neither our Board of Directors nor the Investors are making any recommendation
regarding your exercise of the subscription rights. You are urged to make your decision based
on your own assessment of our business and the Rights Offering. Please see Risk Factors for
a discussion of some of the risks involved in investing in our Common Stock. |
S-20
|
|
|
Subscription Agent
|
|
Registrar and Transfer Company |
|
|
|
Dividend Policy
|
|
All dividends on the Companys Common Stock have been suspended. See Market for
Common Stock and Dividend Policy on page S-41. |
|
|
|
Market for Common Stock
|
|
Our Common Stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol HMPR. See Market for Common Stock and Dividend Policy at page S-41. |
|
|
|
Backstop Commitment
and Investment Agreements
|
|
We have entered into Investment Agreements with the Investors,
pursuant to which they have agreed to backstop the Rights Offering by purchasing from us, at
the subscription price, any shares not purchased by our existing stockholders up to
100,000,000 shares of Common Stock. If all the conditions to the backstop commitment are met,
the backstop commitment will ensure that we raise gross proceeds of no less than approximately
$40 million through the Rights Offering and the backstop commitment. See Questions and
Answers Relating to the Offering How does the backstop commitment work? |
S-21
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our Common Stock involves various risks. You should carefully understand the
risks described below before you invest in our Common Stock. If any of the following risks
actually occur, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could suffer, in which
case the trading price of our Common Stock could decline. You should read this section together
with the other information presented in this Prospectus.
Risks Related to our Business
We incurred significant losses in 2009 and through the third quarter of 2010 and may continue
to do so in the future, and we can make no assurances as to when we will be profitable.
Throughout 2009 and though the third quarter of 2010, economic conditions in the markets in
which our borrowers operate continued to deteriorate and the levels of loan delinquencies and
defaults that we experienced were substantially higher than historical levels and our net interest
income has declined. Our loan customers continue to operate in an economically stressed
environment.
As a result, our net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 was $30.0 million or $1.02 per common diluted share, and our net loss available
to common shareholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $64.5 million or $2.63 per
common diluted share as compared with net loss available to common shareholders of $14.7 million or
$0.68 per common diluted share and $56.6 million or $2.60 per common diluted share for the three
and nine months, respectively, ended September 30, 2009. The net loss for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 was primarily attributable to provision for loan losses expense of
$183.9 million. This loss would have been significantly greater had it not been for a $111.7
million increase in income available to common shareholders created by the exchange and conversion
of preferred stock to Common Stock in connection with initial closing of the Private Placement.
This income will not reoccur in the future. Moreover, net interest income decreased $8.5 million
and $20.9 million for the three and nine months, respectively, ended September 30, 2010 as compared
to the same period in 2009. In light of the current economic environment, significant additional
provisions for loan losses may be necessary to supplement the allowance for loan losses in the
future. As a result, we may continue to incur significant credit costs and net losses throughout
the remainder of 2010 and into 2011, which would continue to adversely impact our financial
condition and results of operations and the value of our Common Stock. We currently expect that we
will not become profitable again on a quarterly basis until the later portion of 2011. Additional
loan losses could cause us to incur future net losses and could adversely affect the price of, and
market for, our Common Stock.
We may need to raise additional capital that may not be available to us.
As a result of our continuing losses, we may need to raise additional capital in the future if
we continue to incur additional losses or due to regulatory mandates. The ability to raise
additional capital, if needed, will depend in part on conditions in the capital markets at that
time, which are outside our control, and on our financial performance.
Accordingly, additional capital may not be raised, if and when needed, on terms acceptable to
us, or at all. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to maintain our
capital ratios could be materially impaired, and we could face additional regulatory challenges.
The Company has restated its financial statements, which may have a future adverse effect.
The Company may continue to suffer adverse effects from the restatement of its previously
issued financial statements that were included in its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as amended, and its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2010, as amended.
S-22
As a result of this matter, the Company may become subject to civil litigation or regulatory
actions. Any of these matters may contribute to further rating downgrades, negative publicity, and
difficulties in attracting and retaining customers, employees, and management personnel.
Bank of Hampton Roads is restricted from accepting new brokered deposits, and an inability to
maintain our regulatory capital position could adversely affect our operations.
Bank of Hampton Roads Written Agreement (as defined below) prohibits it from accepting any
new brokered deposits, even though it is currently well-capitalized for regulatory purposes.
Because Shore Bank is not included in the Written Agreement, it is not subject to these
restrictions.
In addition, Section 29 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA) limits the use of
brokered deposits by institutions that are less than well-capitalized and allows the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) to place restrictions on interest rates that
institutions may pay. If Bank of Hampton Roads or Shore Bank is unable to remain
well-capitalized for regulatory purposes it will be, among other restrictions, prohibited from
paying rates in excess of 75 basis points above the national market average on deposits of
comparable maturity. Effective January 1, 2010, financial institutions that are not
well-capitalized are prohibited from paying yields for deposits in excess of 75 basis points
above a new national average rate for deposits of comparable maturity, as calculated by the FDIC.
If a restriction is placed on the rates that Bank of Hampton Roads and Shore Bank are able to pay
on deposit accounts that negatively impacts their ability to compete for deposits in our market
area, our banks may be unable to attract or maintain core deposits, and their liquidity and ability
to support demand for loans could be adversely affected.
The Company has received a grand jury subpoena from the United States Department of Justice,
Criminal Division and, although the Company is not a target at this time, and we do not believe we
will become a target, there can be no assurances as to the timing or eventual outcome of the
related investigation.
On November 2, 2010, the Company received from the United States Department of Justice,
Criminal Division, a grand jury subpoena to produce information principally relating to the merger
of Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. into the Company on December 31, 2008, and to loans made by
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gateway Bank & Trust, before
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.s merger with the Company. The United States Department of
Justice, Criminal Division has informed the Company that it is not a target of the investigation at
this time, and we are fully cooperating. Although we do not believe this matter will have a
material adverse affect on the Company and do not believe that we will become a target, we can give
you no assurances as to the timing or eventual outcome of this investigation.
Current and future increases in FDIC insurance premiums, including the FDIC special assessment
imposed on all FDIC-insured institutions, will decrease our earnings. In addition, FDIC insurance
assessments will likely increase from our prior inability to maintain a well-capitalized status,
which would further decrease earnings.
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) temporarily increased the limit on
FDIC coverage to $250,000 for all accounts through December 31, 2013. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd Frank Act), signed by President Obama on July 21,
2010, permanently lifted the FDIC coverage limit to $250,000. The Dodd-Frank Act also revised the
assessment methodology for funding the Deposit Insurance Fund, requiring that assessments be based
on an institutions total liabilities, not just deposit liabilities. In addition, in May of 2009,
the FDIC announced that it had voted to levy a special assessment on insured institutions in order
to facilitate the rebuilding of the Deposit Insurance Fund. The assessment is equal to five basis
points of the Companys total assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. This represented a
charge of approximately $1.4 million, which was recorded as a pre-tax charge during the second
quarter of 2009. The FDIC has indicated that future special assessments are possible.
Even though the First Closing of the Private Placement has returned Bank of Hampton Roads to
well-capitalized status as of September 30, 2010, our FDIC insurance assessments for Bank of
Hampton Roads nonetheless may increase in the future due to a variety of factors. Any increases in
FDIC insurance assessments would decrease our earnings.
S-23
We have entered into the Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the
Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions, which requires us to dedicate a significant amount of
resources to complying with the agreement and may have a material adverse effect on our operations
and the value of our securities.
Effective June 17, 2010, the Company and Bank of Hampton Roads entered into a written
agreement (the Written Agreement) with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (the Reserve Bank)
and the Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions (the Virginia Bureau). Shore Bank is not a
party to the Written Agreement.
Under the terms of the Written Agreement, Bank of Hampton Roads has agreed to develop and
submit for approval within the time periods specified in the Written Agreement, written plans to:
|
|
|
strengthen board oversight of management and Bank of Hampton Roads operations; |
|
|
|
|
strengthen credit risk management policies; |
|
|
|
|
improve Bank of Hampton Roads position with respect to loans,
relationships, or other assets in excess of $2.5 million that are now or in the
future may become past due more than 90 days, are on Bank of Hampton Roads problem
loan list, or adversely classified in any report of examination of Bank of Hampton
Roads; |
|
|
|
|
review and revise, as appropriate, current policy and maintain sound
processes for determining, documenting, and recording an adequate allowance for
loan and lease losses; |
|
|
|
|
improve management of Bank of Hampton Roads liquidity position and
funds management policies; |
|
|
|
|
provide contingency planning that accounts for adverse scenarios and
identifies and quantifies available sources of liquidity for each scenario; |
|
|
|
|
reduce Bank of Hampton Roads reliance on brokered deposits; and |
|
|
|
|
improve Bank of Hampton Roads earnings and overall condition. |
In addition, Bank of Hampton Roads has agreed that it will:
|
|
|
not extend, renew, or restructure any credit that has been criticized
by the Reserve Bank or the Virginia Bureau absent prior Board of Directors approval
in accordance with the restrictions in the Written Agreement; |
|
|
|
eliminate all assets or portions of assets classified as loss and
thereafter charge off all assets classified as loss in a federal or state report
of examination, unless otherwise approved by the Reserve Bank; |
|
|
|
comply with legal and regulatory limitations on indemnification payments and severance payments; and |
|
|
|
|
appoint a committee to monitor compliance with the terms of the Written Agreement. |
In addition, the Company has agreed that it will:
|
|
|
not take any other form of payment representing a reduction in Bank of
Hampton Roads capital or make any distributions of interest, principal, or other
sums on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities absent prior
regulatory approval; |
|
|
|
take all necessary steps to correct certain technical violations of law
and regulation cited by the Reserve Bank; |
|
|
|
refrain from guaranteeing any debt without the prior written approval
of the Reserve Bank and the Virginia Bureau; and |
S-24
|
|
|
refrain from purchasing or redeeming any shares of its stock without
the prior written consent of the Reserve Bank or the Virginia Bureau. |
Under the terms of the Written Agreement, the Company and Bank of Hampton Roads have submitted
for approval capital plans to maintain sufficient capital at the Company, on a consolidated basis,
and at Bank of Hampton Roads, on a stand-alone basis, and to refrain from declaring or paying
dividends absent prior regulatory approval.
This description of the Written Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
copy of the Written Agreement filed with the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 17,
2010. To date, the Company and Bank of Hampton Roads have met all of the deadlines for taking
actions required by the Reserve Bank and the Virginia Bureau under the terms of the Written
Agreement. The Audit Committee has been appointed to oversee the Companys compliance with the
terms of the agreement and has met each month to review compliance. Written plans have been
submitted for strengthening board oversight, strengthening credit risk management practices,
improving liquidity, reducing the reliance on brokered deposits, improving capital, and curing the
technical violations of laws and regulations. The Company has also submitted its written policies
and procedures for maintaining an adequate allowance for loan and lease losses and its plans for
all foreclosed real estate and nonaccrual and delinquent loans in excess of $2.5 million.
Additionally, the Company instituted the required review process for all classified loans.
Previously, the Company charged off the assets identified as loss from the previous examination.
Moreover, the Company has raised $235.0 million in the First Closing of the Private Placement. The
Company and Bank of Hampton Roads were well-capitalized as of September 30, 2010. As a result,
management believes the Company and Bank of Hampton Roads are in full compliance with the terms of
the agreement. If, however, we do not comply with the Written Agreement, we could be subject to
the assessment of civil money penalties, further regulatory sanctions, or other regulatory
enforcement actions.
Our estimate for losses in our loan portfolio may be inadequate, which would cause our results of
operations and financial condition to be adversely affected.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses, which is a reserve established through a provision
for loan losses charged to our expenses, that represents managements best estimate of probable
losses within our existing portfolio of loans. Our allowance for loan losses amounted to $163.3
million at September 30, 2010 as compared to $132.7 million at December 31, 2009. The level of the
allowance reflects managements estimates and judgments as to specific credit risks, evaluation of
industry concentrations, loan loss experience, current loan portfolio quality, present economic,
political, and regulatory conditions, and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan
portfolio that have been increasing in light of recent economic conditions. The determination of
the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses inherently involves a high degree of
subjectivity and requires management to make significant estimates of current credit risks and
future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Our allowance for loan losses may
increase significantly in the future. Any such increases in the allowance for loan losses may have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and the value of our
Common Stock.
We have had and may continue to have large numbers of problem loans and difficulties with our loan
administration, which could increase our losses related to loans.
Our non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets increased to 12% at September 30,
2010 from 9% at December 31, 2009. On September 30, 2010, 0.95% of our loans are 30 to 89 days
delinquent and are treated as performing assets. Based on these delinquencies, we expect more
loans to become non-performing. The administration of non-performing loans is an important
function in attempting to mitigate any future losses related to our non-performing assets.
In the past, our management of non-performing loans was, at times, not as strong as we would
prefer. In 2009, we hired an independent third party to review a significant portion of our loans.
The independent third party discovered several issues with our loan management that we have since
taken significant remedial steps to address. The following issues were identified: updated
appraisals on problem loans and large loans secured by real estate were not always being obtained;
better organized credit files were needed; additional resources were needed to manage problem
loans; and a lack of well-defined internal workout policies and procedures.
S-25
A variety of initiatives were undertaken in 2009 to remediate the conditions noted above as
well as other enhancements to our credit review and collection processes. Initiatives and
procedures which augmented the credit administration function included acquisition and development
loan reviews, interest reserve loan reviews, past due loan reviews, forecasting reviews, standard
loan reviews, loans presented for approval and renewal, relationship reviews, and global cash flow
analyses. We have improved the organization of our credit files and have made efforts to attain
appraisal updates in a timelier manner. In addition to the internal review of credit quality, we
engaged an independent credit consulting firm to conduct an analysis of our loan portfolio. We
also increased staffing in credit administration and established and staffed a separate special
assets function to manage problem assets.
Although we have made significant enhancements to our loan management processes to address
these issues, we can give you no assurances that we will be able to successfully manage our problem
loans, our loan administration, and origination process. If we are unable to do so in a timely
manner, our loan losses could increase significantly and this could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations and the value of, or market for, our Common Stock.
If we fail to meet the continued listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market, our
Common Stock could be delisted.
Our Common Stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. As a NASDAQ Global Select
Market listed company, we are required to comply with the continued listing requirements of the
NASDAQ Marketplace Rules to maintain our listing status. Among these continued listing
requirements is the requirement that our Common Stock maintain a minimum closing bid price of at
least $1.00 per share. Our Common Stock has recently begun to trade below the minimum closing bid
price requirement under the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. If the closing bid price for our Common Stock
falls below $1.00 for 30 consecutive trading days, NASDAQ will deliver a deficiency letter to us
for failing to meet this continued listing requirement and require compliance with this requirement
within 180 days after the deficiency unless another extension is permitted under the NASDAQ
Marketplace Rules. One option available to the Company for addressing this issue would be for the
Company to implement a reverse stock split, which, if implemented, could raise the price of the
Companys Common Stock on September 28, 2010, the Companys shareholders authorized management to
effect a reverse stock split at managements discretion. If, however, we are unable to implement a
reverse stock split for any reason and/or if we are unable to otherwise regain compliance with
NASDAQ continued listing requirements, our Common Stock could be delisted.
Delisting from the NASDAQ Global Select Market could reduce the ability of investors to
purchase or sell our Common Stock as quickly and as inexpensively as they have done historically
and could subject transactions in our securities to the penny stock rules. Furthermore, failure to
obtain listing on another market or exchange may make it more difficult for traders to sell our
securities. Broker-dealers may be less willing or able to sell or make a market in our securities
because of the penny stock disclosure rules. Not maintaining a listing on a major stock market or
exchange may result in a material decline in the market price of our Common Stock due to a decrease
in liquidity and reduced interest by institutions and individuals in investing in our securities.
Delisting could also make it more difficult for us to raise capital in the future.
Governmental regulation and regulatory actions against us may impair our operations or restrict our
growth.
We are subject to significant governmental supervision and regulation. These regulations are
intended primarily for the protection of depositors, rather than shareholders. Statutes and
regulations affecting our business may be changed at any time and the interpretation of these
statutes and regulations by examining authorities may also change. Within the last several years,
Congress and the President have passed and enacted significant changes to these statutes and
regulations. There can be no assurance that such changes to the statutes and regulations or to
their interpretation will not adversely affect our business. In addition to governmental
supervision and regulation, we are subject to changes in other federal and state laws, including
changes in tax laws, which could materially affect the banking industry.
S-26
We are subject to the rules and regulations of the Federal Reserve Bank. If we fail to comply
with federal and state bank regulations, the regulators may limit our activities or growth and
impose monetary penalties, which could severely limit or end our operations. Banking laws and
regulations change from time to time. Bank regulations can hinder our ability to compete with
financial services companies that are not regulated in the same manner or are less regulated.
Federal and state bank regulatory agencies regulate many aspects of our operations. These areas
include:
|
|
|
The level of capital that must be maintained; |
|
|
|
The kinds of activities that can be engaged in; |
|
|
|
The kinds and amounts of investments that can be made; |
|
|
|
The locations of our financial centers; |
|
|
|
Insurance of deposits and the premiums that we must pay for this insurance; and |
|
|
|
The amount of cash we must set aside as reserves for deposits. |
Bank regulatory authorities have the authority to bring enforcement actions against banks and
bank holding companies for unsafe or unsound practices in the conduct of their businesses or for
violations of any law, rule, or regulation.
We are aware of and previously disclosed to our regulators that a $21.5 million loan from Bank
of Hampton Roads to the Company is inadequately secured in violation of Regulation W promulgated by
the Federal Reserve Bank and remains outstanding as of the date of this Prospectus. Possible
enforcement actions against us could include the issuance of a cease-and-desist order that could be
judicially enforced; the imposition of civil monetary penalties; the issuance of directives to
increase capital or enter into a strategic transaction, whether by merger or otherwise, with a
third party; the appointment of a conservator or receiver; the termination of insurance of
deposits; the issuance of removal and prohibition orders against institution-affiliated parties;
and the enforcement of such actions through injunctions or restraining orders. Any such regulatory
action may have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our bank subsidiaries and
execute our strategy.
If the value of real estate in the markets we serve were to further decline materially, a
significant portion of our loan portfolio could become further under-collateralized, which could
have a material adverse effect on us.
With approximately three-fourths of our loans concentrated in the regions of Hampton Roads,
Richmond, and the Eastern Shore of Virginia and the Triangle region of North Carolina, a decline in
local economic conditions could adversely affect the value of the real estate collateral securing
our loans. Moreover, our markets in Wilmington, North Carolina and the Outer Banks of North
Carolina have been especially hard hit by recent declines in real estate values. A further decline
in property values would diminish our ability to recover on defaulted loans by selling the real
estate collateral, making it more likely that we would suffer losses on defaulted loans.
Additionally, a decrease in asset quality could require additions to our allowance for loan losses
through increased provisions for loan losses, which would negatively impact our profits. Also, a
decline in local economic conditions may have a greater effect on our earnings and capital than on
the earnings and capital of financial institutions whose real estate loan portfolios are more
geographically diverse. Real estate values are affected by various factors in addition to local
economic conditions, including, among other things, changes in general or regional economic
conditions, governmental rules or policies, and natural disasters.
Our commercial real estate and equity line lending may expose us to a greater risk of loss and hurt
our earnings and profitability.
Our business strategy centers, in part, on offering commercial and equity line loans secured
by real estate in order to generate interest income. These types of loans generally have higher
yields and shorter maturities than traditional one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. At
September 30, 2010, commercial and residential loans secured by real estate totaled $1.23
billion, which represented 55% of total loans. Such loans increase our credit risk profile
relative to other financial institutions that have lower concentrations of commercial real estate
and equity line loans.
Loans secured by commercial real estate properties are generally for larger amounts and
involve a greater degree of risk than one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. Payments on
loans secured by these properties generally are dependent on the income produced by the underlying
properties which, in turn, depends on the successful operation and management of the properties.
Accordingly, repayment of these loans is subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or
the local economy. While we seek to minimize these risks in a variety of ways, there can be no
assurance that these measures will protect against credit-related losses.
S-27
Equity line loans typically involve a greater degree of risk than one-to-four family
residential mortgage loans. Equity line lending allows a customer to access an amount up to their
line of credit for the term specified in their agreement. At the expiration of the term of an
equity line, a customer may have the entire principal balance outstanding as opposed to a
one-to-four family residential mortgage loan where the principal is disbursed entirely at closing
and amortizes throughout the term of the loan. We cannot predict when and to what extent our
customers will access their equity lines. While we seek to minimize this risk in a variety of
ways, including attempting to employ conservative underwriting criteria, there can be no assurance
that these measures will protect against credit-related losses.
A significant amount of our loan portfolio contains loans used to finance construction and land
development and these types of loans subject our loan portfolio to a higher degree of credit risk.
Although we are no longer making new loans to finance construction and land development, a
significant amount of our portfolio contains such loans. Construction financing typically involves
a higher degree of credit risk than financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of
loss on a construction loan is largely dependent upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the
propertys value at completion of construction, the marketability of the property, and the bid
price and estimated cost (including interest) of construction. If the estimate of construction
costs proves to be inaccurate, we may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally
committed to permit completion of the project. If the estimate of the value proves to be
inaccurate, we may be confronted, at or prior to the maturity of the loan, with a project whose
value is insufficient to assure full repayment. When lending to builders, the cost of construction
breakdown is provided by the builder, as well as supported by the appraisal. Although our
underwriting criteria were designed to evaluate and minimize the risks of each construction loan,
there can be no guarantee that these practices will have safeguarded against material delinquencies
and losses to our operations.
At September 30, 2010, we had loans of $560.2 million or 27% of total loans outstanding to
finance construction and land development. Construction and land development loans are dependent
on the successful completion of the projects they finance, however, in many cases such construction
and development projects in our primary market areas are not being completed in a timely manner, if
at all.
Our lending on vacant land may expose us to a greater risk of loss and may have an adverse effect
on results of operations.
A portion of our residential and commercial lending is secured by vacant or unimproved land.
Loans secured by vacant or unimproved land are generally more risky than loans secured by improved
property for one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. Since vacant or unimproved land is
generally held by the borrower for investment purposes or future use, payments on loans secured by
vacant or unimproved land will typically rank lower in priority to the borrower than a loan the
borrower may have on their primary residence or business. These loans are susceptible to adverse
conditions in the real estate market and local economy.
Difficult market conditions have adversely affected our industry.
The global and U.S. economies continue to experience a protracted slowdown in business
activity as a result of disruptions in the financial system, including a lack of confidence in the
worldwide credit markets. Currently, the U.S. economy remains in the midst of one of its longest
economic recessions in recent history. Dramatic declines in the housing market over more than the
past 24 months, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures, unemployment, and
under-employment, have negatively impacted the credit performance of real estate related loans and
resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions. These write-downs,
initially of asset-backed securities but spreading to other securities and loans, have caused many
financial institutions to seek additional capital, to reduce or eliminate dividends, to merge with
larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to fail.
Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets and the strength of
counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced or ceased providing funding
to borrowers, including to other financial institutions.
S-28
Market turmoil and tightening of credit
have led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer
confidence, increased market volatility, and widespread reduction of business activity generally.
The resulting economic pressure on consumers and lack of confidence in the financial markets could
continue to adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Market
developments may continue to affect consumer confidence levels and may cause adverse changes in
payment patterns, causing increases in delinquencies and default rates, which may impact our
charge-offs and provision for credit losses. A worsening of these conditions would likely
exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions on us and could have a material
adverse effect on the value of, or market for, our Common Stock.
Our ability to maintain adequate sources of funding may be negatively impacted by the current
economic environment which may, among other things, impact our ability to resume the payment of
dividends or satisfy our obligations.
Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities on terms which are
acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services
industry or economy in general. In managing our balance sheet, a primary source of funding is
customer deposits. Our ability to continue to attract these deposits and other funding sources is
subject to variability based upon a number of factors including volume and volatility in the
securities markets and the relative interest rates that we are prepared to pay for these
liabilities. Further, Bank of Hampton Roads is prohibited under the Written Agreement with the
Reserve Bank from accepting new brokered deposits. Our potential inability to maintain adequate
sources of funding may, among other things, impact our ability to resume the payment of dividends
or satisfy our obligations.
Our ability to maintain adequate sources of liquidity may be negatively impacted by the current
economic environment which may, among other things, impact our ability to pay dividends or satisfy
our obligations.
Liquidity is essential to our business. An inability to raise funds through deposits,
borrowings, the sale of investments or loans, the issuance of equity and debt securities, and other
sources could have a substantial negative affect on our liquidity. Factors that could
detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include operating losses; rising levels of
non-performing assets; a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a downturn
in the markets in which our loans or deposits are concentrated or as a result of a loss of
confidence in us by our customers, lenders, and/or investors; or adverse regulatory action against
us. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a
disruption in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the
financial industry in light of the turmoil faced by banking organizations and the continued
deterioration in credit markets. Under current market conditions, the confidence of depositors,
lenders, and investors is critical to our ability to maintain our sources of liquidity.
The management of liquidity risk is critical to the management of our business and to our
ability to service our customer base. In managing our balance sheet, a primary source of liquidity
is customer deposits. Our ability to continue to attract these deposits and other funding sources
is subject to variability based upon a number of factors including volume and volatility in the
securities markets and the relative interest rates that we are prepared to pay for these
liabilities. The availability and level of deposits and other funding sources, including
borrowings and the issuance of equity and debt securities, is highly dependent upon the perception
of the liquidity and creditworthiness of the financial institution, and such perception can change
quickly in response to market conditions or circumstances unique to a particular company. Concerns
about our financial condition or concerns about our credit exposure to other persons could
adversely impact our sources of liquidity, financial position, regulatory capital ratios, results
of operations, and our business prospects.
The current economic environment may negatively impact our ability to maintain required capital
levels or otherwise negatively impact our financial condition, which may, among other things, limit
our access to certain sources of funding and liquidity.
If the level of deposits were to materially decrease, we would have to raise additional funds
by increasing the interest that we pay on certificates of deposit or other depository accounts,
seek other debt or equity financing, or draw upon our available lines of credit. Shore Bank relies
on brokered deposits (and Bank of Hampton Roads has historically relied on such deposits) and we
rely on commercial retail deposits as well as advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (the FHLB)
and the Federal Reserve Bank discount window to fund our operations.
S-29
Although we have historically
been able to replace maturing deposits and advances as necessary, we might not be able to replace
such funds in the future if, among other things, our results of operations or financial condition
or the results of operations or financial condition of the FHLB or market conditions were to change
or because we are restricted from doing so by regulatory restrictions. For example, Bank of
Hampton Roads is prohibited from obtaining brokered deposits pursuant to the terms of its Written
Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank. Additionally, the FHLB or Federal Reserve Bank could
limit our access to additional borrowings. We constantly monitor our activities with respect to
liquidity and evaluate closely our utilization of our cash assets; however, there can be no
assurance that our liquidity or the cost of funds to us may not be materially and adversely
impacted as a result of economic, market, or operational considerations that we may not be able to
control.
S-30
We may face increasing deposit-pricing pressures, which may, among other things, reduce our
profitability.
Deposit pricing pressures may result from competition as well as changes to the interest rate
environment. Under current conditions, pricing pressures also may arise from depositors who demand
premium interest rates from what they perceive to be a troubled financial institution. Current
economic conditions have intensified competition for deposits. The competition has had an impact
on interest rates paid to attract deposits as well as fees charged on deposit products. In
addition to the competitive pressures from other depository institutions, we face heightened
competition from non-depository financial products such as securities and other alternative
investments.
Furthermore, technology and other market changes have made it more convenient for bank
customers to transfer funds for investing purposes. Bank customers also have greater access to
deposit vehicles that facilitate spreading deposit balances among different depository institutions
to maximize FDIC insurance coverage. In addition to competitive forces, we also are at risk from
market forces as they affect interest rates. It is not uncommon when interest rates transition
from a low interest rate environment to a rising rate environment for deposit and other funding
costs to rise in advance of yields on earning assets. In order to keep deposits required for
funding purposes, it may be necessary to raise deposit rates without commensurate increases in
asset pricing in the short term. Finally, we may see interest rate pricing pressure from
depositors concerned about our financial condition and levels of non-performing assets.
We may continue to incur losses if we are unable to successfully manage interest rate risk.
Our profitability depends in substantial part upon the spread between the interest rates
earned on investments and loans and the interest rates paid on deposits and other interest-bearing
liabilities. These rates are normally in line with general market rates and rise and fall based on
managements view of our needs. Changes in interest rates will affect our operating performance
and financial condition in diverse ways including the pricing of securities, loans and deposits,
and the volume of loan originations in our mortgage banking business, and could result in decreases
to our net income. Our net interest income will be adversely affected if market interest rates
change so that the interest we pay on deposits and borrowings increases faster than the interest we
earn on loans and investments. This could, in turn, have a material adverse affect on the value of
our Common Stock.
Our future success is dependent on our ability to compete effectively in the highly competitive
banking industry.
We face vigorous competition from other banks and other financial institutions, including
savings and loan associations, savings banks, finance companies, and credit unions for deposits,
loans, and other financial services that serve our market area. A number of these banks and other
financial institutions are significantly larger than we are and have substantially greater access
to capital and other resources, as well as larger lending limits and branch systems, and offer a
wider array of banking services. Many of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same
extensive regulations that govern us. As a result, these non-bank competitors have advantages over
us in providing certain services. While we believe we compete effectively with these other
financial institutions serving our primary markets, we may face a competitive disadvantage to
larger institutions. If we have to raise interest rates paid on deposits or lower interest rates
charged on loans to compete effectively, our net interest margin and income could be negatively
affected. Failure to compete effectively to attract new, or to retain existing, clients may reduce
or limit our margins and our market share and may adversely affect our results of operations,
financial condition, growth, and the value of our Common Stock.
Our operations and customers might be affected by the occurrence of a natural disaster or other
catastrophic event in our market area.
Because a substantial portion of our loans are with customers and businesses located in the
central and coastal portions of Virginia, North Carolina, and Maryland, catastrophic events,
including natural disasters such as hurricanes which historically struck the east coast of the
United States with some regularity or terrorist attacks could disrupt our operations. Any of these
natural disasters or other catastrophic events could have a negative impact on our financial
centers and customer base as well as collateral values and the strength of our loan portfolio. Any
natural disaster or catastrophic event affecting us could have a material adverse impact on our
operations and the value of our Common Stock.
S-31
We face a variety of threats from technology based frauds and scams.
Financial institutions are a prime target of criminal activities through various channels of
information technology. We attempt to mitigate risk from such activities through policies,
procedures, and preventative and detective measures. In addition, we maintain insurance coverage
designed to provide a level of financial protection to our business. However, risks posed by
business interruption, fraud losses, business recovery expenses, and other potential losses or
expenses that may be experienced from a significant event are not readily predictable and,
therefore, could have an impact on our results of operations.
Virginia law and the provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws could deter or prevent
takeover attempts by a potential purchaser of our Common Stock that would be willing to pay you a
premium for your shares of our Common Stock.
Our Articles of Incorporation, as well as the Companys Bylaws (the Bylaws), contain
provisions that may be deemed to have the effect of discouraging or delaying uninvited attempts by
third parties to gain control of the Company. These provisions include the division of our Board
of Directors into classes and the ability of our board to set the price, term, and rights of, and
to issue, one or more additional series of our preferred stock. Our Articles of Incorporation and
Bylaws also provide for a classified board of directors, with each member serving a three-year
term, and do not provide for the ability of stockholders to call special meetings.
Similarly, the Virginia Stock Corporation Act contains provisions designed to protect Virginia
corporations and employees from the adverse effects of hostile corporate takeovers. These
provisions reduce the possibility that a third party could effect a change in control without the
support of our incumbent directors. These provisions may also strengthen the position of current
management by restricting the ability of shareholders to change the composition of the board, to
affect its policies generally, and to benefit from actions that are opposed by the current board.
Risks Factors Related to the Offering
The subscription price determined for the Rights Offering is not necessarily an indication of the
fair value of our Common Stock.
The per share subscription price is not necessarily related to our book value, tangible book
value, multiple of earnings or any other established criteria of fair value and may or may not be
considered the fair value of our Common Stock to be offered in the Rights Offering. After the date
of this prospectus, our shares of Common Stock may trade at prices below the subscription price.
If you do not exercise your subscription rights, your percentage ownership will be diluted.
We will issue 100,000,000 shares of our Common Stock in the Rights Offering, either to
Eligible Shareholders or privately to Investors pursuant to their backstop commitment (subject to
the terms of the Investment Agreements). If you choose not to exercise your Basic Subscription
Rights prior to the expiration of the Rights Offering, your relative ownership interest in our
Common Stock will be diluted relative to shareholders who exercise their subscription rights.
The subscription rights are not transferable and there is no market for the subscription rights.
You may not sell, give away or otherwise transfer your subscription rights. The subscription
rights are only transferable by operation of law. Because the subscription rights are
non-transferable, there is no market or other means for you to directly realize any value
associated with the subscription rights. You must exercise the subscription rights and acquire
shares of our Common Stock to realize any potential value from your subscription rights.
Because our management will have broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds from the Rights
Offering and any sale of shares of Common Stock to the Investors through their backstop commitment,
you may not agree with how we use the proceeds, and we may not invest the proceeds successfully.
S-32
While we currently anticipate that we will use the net proceeds of the Rights Offering and any
sale of shares of Common Stock to the Investors through their backstop commitment to make capital
contributions to our subsidiary banks and for other general corporate purposes, out management may
allocate the proceeds as it deems appropriate. In addition, market factors may require our
management to allocate portions of the proceeds for other purposes. Accordingly, you will be
relying on the judgment of our management with regard to the use of the proceeds of the Rights
Offering and any sale of shares of Common Stock to the Investors through their backstop commitment,
and you will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether the
proceeds are being used appropriately. It is possible that the proceeds will be invested in a way
that does not yield a favorable, or any, return for us.
If you do not act promptly and follow the subscription instructions, your exercise of subscription
rights will be rejected.
If you desire to purchase shares in the Rights Offering, you must act promptly to ensure that
the subscription agent actually receives all required forms and payments before the expiration of
the Rights Offering at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on, 2010, unless we extend the Rights Offering for
additional periods. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you must act promptly to ensure that
your broker, dealer, custodian bank or other nominee acts for you and that the subscription agent
receives all required forms and payments before the Rights Offering expires. We are not
responsible if your nominee fails to ensure that the subscription agent receives all required forms
and payments before the Rights Offering expires. If you fail to complete and sign the required
subscription forms, send an incorrect payment amount, or otherwise fail to follow the subscription
procedures that apply to the exercise of your subscription rights before the Rights Offering
expires, the subscription agent will reject your subscription or accept it only to the extent of
the payment received. Neither we nor our subscription agent undertakes any responsibility or action
to contact you concerning an incomplete or incorrect subscription form or payment, nor are we under
any obligation to correct such forms or payment. We have the sole discretion to determine whether a
subscription exercise properly complies with the subscription procedures.
You will not be able to sell the shares you buy in the Rights Offering until you receive your stock
certificates or your account is credited with the Common Stock.
If you purchase shares in the Rights Offering by submitting a rights certificate and payment,
we will mail you a stock certificate as soon as practicable after, December 10, 2010, or such later
date as to which the Rights Offering may be extended. If your shares are held by a broker, dealer,
custodian bank or other nominee and you purchase shares, your account with your nominee will be
credited with the shares of our Common Stock you purchased in the Rights Offering as soon as
practicable after the expiration of the Rights Offering, or such later date as to which the Rights
Offering may be extended. Until your stock certificates have been delivered or your account is
credited, you may not be able to sell your shares even though the Common Stock issued in the Rights
Offering will be listed for trading on The NASDAQ Global Select Market. The stock price may
decline between the time you decide to sell your shares and the time you are actually able to sell
your shares.
We may cancel the Rights Offering at any time prior to the expiration of the Rights Offering, and
neither we nor the subscription agent will have any obligation to you except to return your
exercise payments.
We may, in our sole discretion, decide not to continue with the Rights Offering or cancel the
Rights Offering prior to the expiration of the Rights Offering. If the Rights Offering is
cancelled, all subscription payments received by the subscription agent will be returned, without
interest or penalty, as soon as practicable.
The backstop commitment and the Second Closing are subject to certain conditions, some of which are
unrelated to the Rights Offering. As a result, we may not close on or receive the funds for the
backstop commitment or the Second Closing.
The Investors backstop commitment and requirement to fund the Second Closing are subject
to several conditions, some of which are unrelated to the Rights Offering. If those conditions are
not met, the Investors will not be obligated to purchase any shares of our Common Stock through the
backstop commitment or participate in the Second Closing.
S-33
With respect to the Rights Offering, the covenant of each Investor to backstop is subject to
the simultaneous backstop by the other Investors. With respect to the issuance of shares in
connection with the Second Closing, the Investment Agreements provide for various additional
conditions in order for the Second Closing to be effected, including: the Rights Offering must have
been consummated; the Company must received (or shall have received concurrently with the Second
Closing) proceeds in the aggregate amount of not less than $275,000,000 from Investors; there shall
have been no violation of banking law or regulation triggered by the issuance of Common Stock or
warrants; the issuance of Common Stock or warrants shall not result in any Investor being required
to file a notice with the certain regulators; the issuance of Common Stock or warrants shall not
cause any Investor (together with any person whose ownership of voting securities would be
aggregated with such Investor) to exceed their relevant ownership threshold (24.9% or 9.9%); and
there shall be no governmental consents required.
Your commitment to purchase shares in the Rights Offering will be binding on you not later
than December 10, 2010. The funding for the backstop and the Second Closing will not occur until
after the Rights Offering is completed. When deciding whether to purchase additional shares of our
Common Stock in the offering, you should not assume that we will be able to close on or receive the
funds for the backstop commitment or the Second Closing.
Risks Factors Related to Our Common Stock
Because we will issue additional shares of Common Stock, your investment could be subject to
substantial dilution.
In addition to the 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock to be issued in the Rights Offering and
backstop, we anticipate additional funding in the form of equity financing from the sale of our
Common Stock and currently plan to issue 50,000,000 million additional shares of Common Stock
without further shareholder approval in the Second Closing. As such, your investment could be
subject to substantial dilution. Dilution is the difference between what you pay for your stock
and the net tangible book value per share immediately after the additional shares are sold by us.
The market for our Common Stock historically has experienced significant price and volume
fluctuations.
The market for our Common Stock historically has experienced and may continue to experience
significant price and volume fluctuations similar to those experienced by the broader stock market
in recent years. Generally, the fluctuations experienced by the broader stock market have affected
the market prices of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their operating
performance and may adversely affect the price of our Common Stock. In addition, our announcements
of our quarterly operating results, changes in general conditions in the economy or the financial
markets and other developments affecting us, our affiliates or our competitors could cause the
market price of our Common Stock to fluctuate substantially.
We are not paying dividends on our Common Stock and currently are prevented from doing so. The
failure to resume paying dividends on our Common Stock may adversely affect us.
We historically paid cash dividends prior to the third quarter of 2009. During the third
quarter of 2009, we suspended dividend payments on our Common Stock. We are prevented by our
regulators from paying dividends until our financial position improves. In addition, the retained
deficit of Bank of Hampton Roads, our principal banking subsidiary is currently $319.9 million.
Absent permission from the Virginia State Corporation Commission, Bank of Hampton Roads may pay
dividends to us only to the extent of positive accumulated retained earnings. It is unlikely in the
near term that we would be able to pay dividends if Bank of Hampton Roads cannot pay dividends to
us. As a result, there is no assurance if or when we will be able to resume paying cash dividends.
Even if we are allowed by our regulators to resume paying dividends again, the Exchange Agreement
provides that, until the earlier of December 31, 2011 or such time as the Treasury ceases to own
any debt or equity securities of the Company, we must obtain the consent of the Treasury prior to
declaring or paying any cash dividend of more than $0.006 per share of our Common Stock.
In addition, all dividends are declared and paid at the discretion of our Board of Directors
and are dependent upon our liquidity, financial condition, results of operations, regulatory
capital requirements, and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant. The
ability of our banking subsidiaries to pay dividends to us is also limited by obligations to
maintain sufficient capital and by other general restrictions on dividends that are applicable to
our banking subsidiaries. If we do not satisfy these regulatory requirements, we are unable to pay
dividends on our Common Stock.
S-34
Holders of our Common Stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our Board of
Directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. We are subject to formal
regulatory and state law restrictions that do not permit us to declare or pay any dividend without
the prior written approval of our banking regulators. Although we can seek to obtain a waiver of
this prohibition, our regulators may choose not to grant such a waiver, and we would not expect to
be granted a waiver or be released from this obligation until our financial performance and
retained earnings improve significantly. Therefore, we may not be able to resume payments of
dividends in the future.
Risks Relating to Market, Legislative, and Regulatory Events
Our business, financial condition, and results of operations are highly regulated and could be
adversely affected by new or changed regulations and by the manner in which such regulations are
applied by regulatory authorities.
Current economic conditions, particularly in the financial markets, have resulted in
government regulatory agencies placing increased focus on and scrutiny of the financial services
industry. The U.S. Government has intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what has
been commonly referred to as the financial crisis. In addition to participating in the Treasurys
Capital Purchase Program (CPP) and Capital Assistance Program, the U.S. Government has taken
steps that include enhancing the liquidity support available to financial institutions,
establishing a commercial paper funding facility, temporarily guaranteeing money market funds and
certain types of debt issuances, and increasing insured deposits. These programs subject us and
other financial institutions who have participated in these programs to additional restrictions,
oversight and/or costs that may have an impact on our business, financial condition, results of
operations, or the price of our Common Stock.
Compliance with such regulation and scrutiny may significantly increase our costs, impede the
efficiency of our internal business processes, require us to increase our regulatory capital, and
limit our ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner. We also will be
required to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums because market developments have significantly
depleted the insurance fund of the FDIC and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits. The
increased costs associated with anticipated regulatory and political scrutiny could adversely
impact our results of operations.
New proposals for legislation continue to be introduced in the U.S. Congress that could
further substantially increase regulation of the financial services industry. Federal and state
regulatory agencies also frequently adopt changes to their regulations and/or change the manner in
which existing regulations are applied. We cannot predict whether any pending or future
legislation will be adopted or the substance and impact of any such new legislation on us.
Additional regulation could affect us in a substantial way and could have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Banking regulators have broad enforcement power, but regulations are meant to protect depositors
and not investors.
We are subject to supervision by several governmental regulatory agencies. The regulators
interpretation and application of relevant regulations, are beyond our control, may change rapidly
and unpredictably, and can be expected to influence our earnings and growth. In addition, we have
entered into a Written Agreement with the Reserve Bank and Virginia Bureau. For a discussion
regarding risks related to the Written Agreement, see We have entered into the Written Agreement
with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions, which
requires us to dedicate a significant amount of resources to complying with the agreement and may
have a material adverse effect on our operations and the value of our securities.
All such government regulation may limit our growth and the return to our investors by
restricting activities such as the payment of dividends, mergers with, or acquisitions by, other
institutions, investments, loans and interest rates, interest rates paid on deposits, the use of
brokered deposits, and the creation of financial centers. Although these regulations impose costs
on us, they are intended to protect depositors. The regulations to which we are subject may not
always be in the best interests of investors.
S-35
The fiscal, monetary, and regulatory policies of the Federal Government and its agencies could have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System regulates the supply of money and credit
in the United States. Its policies determine, in large part, the cost of funds for lending and
investing and the return earned on those loans and investments, both of which affect our net
interest margin. It also can materially decrease the value of financial assets we hold, such as
debt securities. Its policies also can adversely affect borrowers, potentially increasing the risk
that they may fail to repay their loans.
In addition, as a public company we are subject to securities laws and standards imposed by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Because we are a relatively small company, the costs of compliance are
disproportionate compared with much larger organizations. Continued growth of legal and regulatory
compliance mandates could adversely affect our expenses, future results of operations, and the
value of our Common Stock. In addition, the government and regulatory authorities have the power
to impose rules or other requirements, including requirements that we are unable to anticipate,
that could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and the value of our Common Stock.
The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act may adversely affect our business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act into law. The Dodd-Frank Act makes
extensive changes to the laws regulating financial services firms and requires significant
rule-making. In addition, the law mandates multiple studies, which could result in additional
legislative or regulatory action. While the full effects of the Dodd-Frank Act on the Company
cannot yet be determined, the new law is generally perceived as negatively impacting the financial
services industry and may result in an increase in our compliance costs and reduction in our
interchange fees.
Although management does not expect the Dodd-Frank Act to have a material adverse effect on
the Company, it is not possible to predict at this time all the effects the Dodd-Frank Act will
have on the Company and the rest of the financial institution industry. It is possible that the
Companys interest expense could increase and deposit insurance premiums could change and steps may
need to be taken to increase qualifying capital.
The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.
Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the
actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions
are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. As a
result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services
institutions, or the financial services industry, generally, have led to market-wide liquidity
problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. Many of these
transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty or client. In
addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be liquidated at
prices sufficient to recover the full amount of the financial instrument exposure due us. There is
no assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect our results of
operations and the value of, or market for, our Common Stock.
CAUTION ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Where appropriate, statements in this Prospectus may contain the insights of management into
known events and trends that have or may be expected to have a material effect on our operations
and financial condition. The information presented may also contain certain forward-looking
statements regarding future financial performance, which are not historical facts and which involve
various risks and uncertainties.
We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and
are including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. These
forward-looking statements represent plans, estimates, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations,
intentions, projections and statements of our beliefs concerning future events, business plans,
objectives, expected operating results and the assumptions upon which those statements are based.
The words believes, expects, may, will, should, projects, contemplates,
anticipates, forecasts, intends, or other similar words or terms are intended to identify
forward-looking statements.
S-36
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant
uncertainties because they are based upon or are affected by risk factors described in the Risk
Factors section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as
amended, and our Quarterly Reports on Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2010, as amended,
June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2010, and include the following risks related to our business:
|
|
|
We incurred significant losses in 2009 and through the third quarter of 2010 and may
continue to do so in the future, and we can make no assurances as to when we will be
profitable; |
|
|
|
We may need to raise additional capital that may not be available to us; |
|
|
|
The Company has restated its financial statements, which may have a future adverse
effect; |
|
|
|
Bank of Hampton Roads is restricted from accepting new brokered deposits, and an
inability to maintain our regulatory capital position could adversely affect our
operations; |
|
|
|
The Company has received a grand jury subpoena from the United States Department of
Justice, Criminal Division and, although the Company is not a target at this time, and we
do not believe we will become a target, there can be no assurances as to the timing or
eventual outcome of the related investigation; |
|
|
|
Current and future increases in FDIC insurance premiums, including the FDIC special
assessment imposed on all FDIC-insured institutions, will decrease our earnings. In
addition, FDIC insurance assessments will likely increase from the prior inability to
maintain a well- capitalized status, which would further decrease earnings; |
|
|
|
We have entered into a written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and
the Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions, which requires us to designate a
significant amount of resources to complying with the agreement and may have a material
adverse effect on our operations and the value of our securities; |
|
|
|
Our estimate for losses in our loan portfolio may be inadequate, which would cause our
results of operations and financial condition to be adversely affected; |
|
|
|
We have had and may continue to have large numbers of problem loans and difficulties
with our loan administration, which could increase our losses related to loans; |
|
|
|
If we fail to meet the continued listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select
Market, our Common Stock could be delisted; |
|
|
|
Governmental regulation and regulatory actions against us may impair our operations or
restrict our growth; |
|
|
|
If the value of real estate in the markets we serve were to further decline
materially, a significant portion of our loan portfolio could become further
under-collateralized, which could have a material adverse effect on us; |
|
|
|
Our commercial real estate and equity line lending may expose us to a greater risk of
loss and hurt our earnings and profitability; |
|
|
|
A significant amount of our loan portfolio contains loans used to finance construction
and land development and these types of loans subject our loan portfolio to a higher
degree of credit risk; |
|
|
|
Our lending on vacant land may expose us to a greater risk of loss and may have an
adverse effect on results of operations; |
|
|
|
Difficult market conditions have adversely affected our industry; |
|
|
|
Our ability to maintain adequate sources of funding may be negatively impacted by the
current economic environment which may, among other things, impact our future ability to
pay dividends or satisfy our obligations; |
|
|
|
Our ability to maintain adequate sources of liquidity may be negatively impacted by
the current economic environment which may, amount other things, impact our ability to
pay dividends or satisfy our obligations; |
|
|
|
The current economic environment may negatively impact our ability to maintain
required capital levels or otherwise negatively impact our financial condition, which
may, among other things, limit access to certain sources of funding and liquidity; |
|
|
|
We may face increasing deposit-pricing pressures, which may, among other things,
reduce our profitability; |
|
|
|
We may continue to incur losses if we are unable to successfully manage interest rate
risk; |
|
|
|
Our future success is dependent on our ability to compete effectively in the highly
competitive banking industry; |
|
|
|
Our operations and customers might be affected by the occurrence of a natural disaster
or other catastrophic event in our market area; |
|
|
|
We face a variety of threats from technology based frauds and scams; |
S-37
|
|
|
Virginia law and the provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws could
deter or prevent takeover attempts by a potential purchaser of our Common Stock that
would be willing to pay you a premium for your shares of our Common Stock; |
|
|
|
The subscription price determined for the Rights Offering is not necessarily an
indication of the fair value of our Common Stock; |
|
|
|
If you do not exercise your subscription rights, your percentage ownership will be
diluted; |
|
|
|
The subscription rights are not transferable and there is no market for the
subscription rights; |
|
|
|
Because our management will have broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds
from the Rights Offering and any sale of shares of Common Stock to the Investors through
their backstop commitment, you may not agree with how we use the proceeds, and we may not
invest the proceeds successfully; |
|
|
|
If you do not act promptly and follow the subscription instructions, your exercise of
subscription rights will be rejected; |
|
|
|
You will not be able to sell the shares you buy in the Rights Offering until you
receive your stock certificates or your account is credited with the Common Stock; |
|
|
|
We may cancel the Rights Offering at any time prior to the expiration of the Rights
Offering, and neither we nor the subscription agent will have any obligation to you
except to return your exercise payments; |
|
|
|
The backstop commitment and the Second Closing are subject to certain conditions, some
of which are unrelated to the Rights Offering. As a result, we may not close on or
receive the funds for the backstop commitment or the Second Closing; |
|
|
|
Because we will issue additional shares of Common Stock, existing shareholders could
be subject to substantial dilution; |
|
|
|
The market for our Common Stock historically has experienced significant price and
volume fluctuations; |
|
|
|
We are not paying dividends on our Common Stock and currently are prevented from doing
so. The failure to resume paying dividends on our Common Stock may adversely affect us; |
|
|
|
Our business, financial condition, and results of operations are highly regulated and
could be adversely affected by new or changed regulations and by the manner in which such
regulations are applied by regulatory authorities; |
|
|
|
Banking regulators have broad enforcement power, but regulations are meant to protect
depositors and not investors; |
|
|
|
The fiscal, monetary, and regulatory policies of the Federal Government and its
agencies could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations; |
|
|
|
The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act may adversely affect our business, financial
condition, and results of operations; and |
|
|
|
The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us. |
We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which
speak only as of the date made, and advise readers that various factors could affect our financial
performance and cause the actual results for future periods to differ materially from those
anticipated or projected. For a discussion of these factors, you should carefully review the Risk
Factors beginning on page S-22 of this Prospectus, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations starting on page
S-48 and Business beginning on
page S-63. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the future events,
developments or results described by our forward-looking statements in this Prospectus or in the
documents referred to in this Prospectus could turn out to be materially different from those we
discuss or imply.
We do not intend to update or revise our forward-looking statements after the date on the
front cover of this Prospectus, and you should not expect us to do so.
S-38
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
On or about November 16, 2010, we will distribute at no cost the subscription rights, rights
certificates and copies of this Prospectus to our shareholders of record as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern
Time, on September 29, 2010. If you wish to exercise your subscription rights, you must timely
comply with the exercise procedures described below. See The Rights Offering Method of
Exercising Subscription Rights.
Each Right will entitle you to a Basic Subscription Right to purchase 2.2698 shares
of Common Stock at a subscription price of $0.40 per share and an over-subscription privilege. If
you hold a Right and fully exercise your Basic Subscription Rights, you may also subscribe for an
unlimited additional whole number of common shares pursuant to the over-subscription privilege,
subject to availability, provided that (i) no Eligible Shareholder shall thereby exceed, together
with any other person with whom such shareholder may be aggregated under applicable law, 4.9%
beneficial ownership of the Companys equity securities and (ii) the aggregate purchase price of
all common shares purchased in the Rights Offering shall not exceed $40 million.
If you purchase all of the shares available to you pursuant to your Basic Subscription Rights,
you may also choose to purchase a portion of any shares that other shareholders do not purchase by
exercising their Basic Subscription Rights. If sufficient shares are available for offer pursuant
to the Rights Offering, we will seek to honor the over-subscription requests in full. If
over-subscription requests exceed the number of shares available, however, we will allocate the
available shares pro rata among the shareholders exercising the over-subscription privilege in
proportion to the number of shares of our Common Stock each of those shareholders owned on the
Record Date, relative to the number of shares owned on the Record Date by all shareholders
exercising the over-subscription privilege. If this pro rata allocation results in any shareholder
receiving a greater number of shares than the shareholder subscribed for pursuant to the exercise
of the over-subscription privilege, then such shareholder will be allocated only that number of
shares for which the shareholder oversubscribed, and the remaining shares will be allocated among
all other shareholders exercising the over-subscription privilege on the same pro rata basis
described above. The proration process will be repeated until all shares have been allocated.
Subject to certain conditions contained in the Investment Agreements, the Investors have
agreed to purchase from us, at $0.40 per share, all of the shares of Common Stock offered pursuant
to the Rights Offering that are not purchased by Eligible Shareholders. For additional details,
see Questions and Answers Related to the Offering How does the backstop commitment work?
Fractional shares resulting from the exercise of the Basic Subscription Rights and the
over-subscription privileges will be eliminated by rounding down to the nearest whole share.
The Rights Offering to shareholders will terminate at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on December 10,
2010. Funds received by us from shareholders in the Rights Offering will be deposited with and
held by us in a noninterest bearing escrow account until the closing of the Rights Offering. We do
not intend to return the funds of purchasers if fewer than all of the shares offered are sold to
Eligible Shareholders.
The Rights Offering price was determined through a Special Committee of the Board of
Directors. Among the factors considered in determining the price of the shares in this Rights
Offering were: our desire to provide existing shareholders with the opportunity to purchase
additional shares at the same price paid by Investors in the Private Placement, our history and
prospects, our past and present earnings and trends of such earnings, our prospects for future
earnings, our current performance and prospects of our segment of the banking industry, the general
condition of the securities market at the time of the Rights Offering and the prices of equity
securities of comparable companies. There can be no assurance that any of the shares will be sold
in the Rights Offering.
We have agreed to pay the subscription agent customary fees plus certain expenses in
connection with the Rights Offering. We have not employed any brokers, dealers or underwriters in
connection with the solicitation of exercise of subscription rights. Except as described in this
section, we are not paying any other commissions, underwriting fees or discounts in connection with
the Rights Offering.
S-39
Some of our employees may solicit responses from you as a holder of
subscription rights, but we will not pay our employees any commissions or compensation for these
services other than their normal employment compensation. We estimate that our total expenses in
connection with the Rights Offering will be $247,852.
If you have any questions, you should contact the information agent, Douglas J. Glenn, at the
applicable telephone number and address set forth on page S-128.
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds of this offering, after deducting estimated expenses of this
offering payable by us, will be approximately 39.8 million. We intend to use the net proceeds we
receive from this offering to capitalize or subsidiary banks, as necessary, and for other general
corporate purposes.
Our management will retain a certain amount of discretion in deciding how to allocate the
net proceeds of this offering. Until we designate the entire use of the net proceeds, we will
invest them temporarily in liquid short-term securities.
S-40
MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND POLICY
Price Range Of Common Stock
Our Common Stock began trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol HMPR on
September 12, 2007. Prior to listing on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, our Common Stock traded
on the NASDAQ Capital Market starting on August 3, 2006.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low prices per share
of our Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, along with the quarterly cash
dividends per share declared. Per share prices do not include adjustments for markups, markdowns
or commissions. The high and low sale prices per share for our Common Stock for each quarter of
2008 and 2009 and the fourth quarter of 2010 to date, as reported on the market at the time, and
dividends declared during those periods were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
Sales Price |
|
|
Dividend |
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
Declared |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
12.45 |
|
|
$ |
9.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
13.92 |
|
|
|
9.51 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
10.07 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
9.50 |
|
|
$ |
5.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
9.90 |
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Fourth Quarter through November 10, 2010 |
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
S-41
Dividend Policy
We generally paid cash dividends on a quarterly basis until July 30, 2009, when our Board of
Directors suspended the payment of common dividends. We currently are prevented by our regulators
from paying dividends on our Common Stock until our financial position improves. See Business
Government Supervision and Regulation Written Agreement.
The primary source of funds for dividends paid by us to our shareholders is the dividends
received from our subsidiaries. We are a legal entity separate and distinct from our subsidiaries.
Substantially all of our cash revenues will result from dividends paid to us by our bank
subsidiaries and interest earned on short term investments. Our bank subsidiaries are subject to
laws and regulations that limit the amount of dividends that they can pay. Under Virginia law, a
bank may not declare a dividend in excess of its accumulated retained earnings. Additionally, our
bank subsidiaries may not declare a dividend if the total amount of all dividends, including the
proposed dividend, declared by the bank in any calendar year exceeds the total of the banks
retained net income of that year to date, combined with its retained net income of the two
preceding years, unless the dividend is approved by the Reserve Bank. Our bank subsidiaries may
not declare or pay any dividend if, after making the dividend, the bank would be
undercapitalized, as defined in the banking regulations.
The Federal Reserve and the state banking regulators have the general authority to limit the
dividends paid by insured banks if the payment is deemed an unsafe and unsound practice. Both the
state banking regulators and the Federal Reserve have indicated that paying dividends that deplete
a banks capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsound and unsafe banking practice. In
addition, we are subject to certain regulatory requirements to maintain capital at or above
regulatory minimums. These regulatory requirements regarding capital affect our dividend policies.
In addition, bank holding companies should generally pay dividends only if the organizations net
income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fully fund the
dividends, and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the
organizations capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition.
Finally, the Exchange Agreement provides that, until the earlier of December 31, 2011 or such
time as the Treasury ceases to own any debt or equity securities of the Company, we must obtain the
consent of the Treasury prior to declaring or paying any cash dividend of more than $0.006 per
share of our Common Stock.
S-42
CAPITALIZATION AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following tables contain certain financial information as of September 30, 2010 and for
the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 and the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and |
|
|
|
on a pro forma, as adjusted, basis to give effect to the remaining transactions
under the Companys Recapitalization Plan. The remaining transactions include the
Second Closing under the Private Placement and the Rights Offering. |
These tables should be read together with our consolidated historical financial statements and
Managements Discussion and Analysis,
which appear on pages F-1 and S-48, respectively, and in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as amended, Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, as amended, Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter June 30, 2010, and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter September 30, 2010, which are incorporated herein by reference herein.
Pro Forma Balance Sheet
As of September 30, 2010
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Adjusted |
|
Cash and cash equivalent |
|
$ |
690,993 |
|
|
$ |
60,000 |
(1) |
|
|
720,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
190,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,159 |
|
Loans |
|
|
2,135,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,135,811 |
|
Less: allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(163,253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163,253 |
) |
Net loans |
|
|
1,972,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,972,558 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
243,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,862 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,067,572 |
|
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,127,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
2,593,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,593,110 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
268,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,872 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
37,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,047 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
2,899,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,899,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
6,847 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
8,347 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
411,489 |
|
|
|
58,500 |
|
|
|
469,989 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
(253,617 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(253,617 |
) |
Other |
|
|
3,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,824 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
168,543 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
228,543 |
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,067,572 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,127,572 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Increase in cash represents the $60 million in proceeds from the Rights Offering and release of escrow funds in the Second Closing of the
Private Placement. |
S-43
Pro Forma Income Statement
For the year ended December 31, 2009
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
149,445 |
|
|
$ |
120 |
(2) |
|
$ |
149,565 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
44,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,294 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
105,151 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
105,271 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
134,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,223 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(29,072 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(28,952 |
) |
Noninterest income |
|
|
22,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,325 |
|
Noninterest expenses |
|
|
170,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(177,542 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(177,422 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
23,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,908 |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(201,450 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(201,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount |
|
|
8,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.689 |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(210,139 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
$ |
(210,019 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share (basic) |
|
$ |
(9.63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share (fully diluted) |
|
$ |
(9.63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The increase in interest income of $120 thousand represents earnings on the proceeds from the Rights Offering and release of escrow funds in
the Second Closing of the Private Placement invested in overnight funds. |
Pro Forma Income Statement
For the 9 months ended September 30, 2010
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
93,616 |
|
|
|
90 |
(3) |
|
$ |
93,706 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
36,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,043 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
57,573 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
57,663 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
183,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,935 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(126,362 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(126,272 |
) |
Noninterest income |
|
|
16,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,887 |
|
Noninterest expenses |
|
|
68,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(178,289 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(178,199 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(2,219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,219 |
) |
|
|
|
Net (loss) |
|
|
(176,070 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(175,980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount |
|
|
(110,908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,908 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(65,162 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
$ |
(65,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share (basic) |
|
$ |
(2.65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.37 |
) |
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share (fully diluted) |
|
$ |
(2.65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The increase in interest income of $90 thousand represents earnings on the proceeds from the Rights Offering and release of escrow funds in
the Second Closing of the Private Placement invested in overnight funds. |
S-44
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The information at and for the years ended December 31, 2005 through 2009 is derived in part
from, and should be read together with, our audited consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes incorporated by reference into this Prospectus. The information at and for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is unaudited. In the opinion of our management, all
adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the
results of operations for the unaudited periods have been made. The operating data for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that might be
expected for the year.
The financial information presented below has been derived from our audited consolidated
year-end financial statements and unaudited interim financial statements. This information should
be read together with our consolidated historical financial statements and managements discussion
and analysis included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as
amended, and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2010, as amended,
June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2010, which have been filed with the SEC.
Note that years 2005 through 2007 do not include the operations of Gateway or Shore. Year
2008 includes the operations of Shore after June 1, 2008, but not Gateway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
As of Sept |
|
|
As of Sept |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
(Dollars, in thousands) |
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
30, 2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Selected Financial Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
3,067,572 |
|
|
$ |
2,938,994 |
|
|
$ |
2,919,576 |
|
|
$ |
3,085,711 |
|
|
$ |
563,828 |
|
|
$ |
476,299 |
|
|
$ |
409,517 |
|
Loans |
|
|
2,101,085 |
|
|
|
2,514,789 |
|
|
|
2,426,692 |
|
|
|
2,599,526 |
|
|
|
477,149 |
|
|
|
375,044 |
|
|
|
285,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities (including restricted equity securities) |
|
|
190,159 |
|
|
|
131,524 |
|
|
|
190,841 |
|
|
|
177,432 |
|
|
|
47,081 |
|
|
|
59,545 |
|
|
|
73,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangibles |
|
|
11,353 |
|
|
|
66,033 |
|
|
|
12,839 |
|
|
|
98,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
2,593,110 |
|
|
|
2,314,293 |
|
|
|
2,495,040 |
|
|
|
2,296,146 |
|
|
|
431,457 |
|
|
|
363,261 |
|
|
|
327,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
268,872 |
|
|
|
315,177 |
|
|
|
277,469 |
|
|
|
429,588 |
|
|
|
53,000 |
|
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
|
30,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Preferred Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,605 |
|
|
|
134,970 |
|
|
|
133,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Common Stockholders equity |
|
|
168,543 |
|
|
|
151,704 |
|
|
|
(9,957 |
) |
|
|
211,267 |
|
|
|
73,660 |
|
|
|
70,163 |
|
|
|
49,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
168,543 |
|
|
|
286,309 |
|
|
|
125,013 |
|
|
|
344,809 |
|
|
|
73,660 |
|
|
|
70,163 |
|
|
|
49,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity |
|
|
157,190 |
|
|
|
85,671 |
|
|
|
(22,796 |
) |
|
|
112,900 |
|
|
|
73,660 |
|
|
|
70,163 |
|
|
|
49,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
163,253 |
|
|
|
99,178 |
|
|
|
132,697 |
|
|
|
51,218 |
(1) |
|
|
5,043 |
|
|
|
3,911 |
|
|
|
3,597 |
|
S-45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Period Ended |
|
|
For the Period Ended |
|
|
For the Period Ended |
|
|
For the Period Ended |
|
|
For the Period Ended |
|
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
For the Period Ended |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
|
Sept. 30, 2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and dividend income |
|
$ |
93,616 |
|
|
$ |
114,647 |
|
|
$ |
149,445 |
|
|
$ |
45,177 |
|
|
$ |
38,203 |
|
|
$ |
30,021 |
|
|
$ |
24,558 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
36,043 |
|
|
|
36,197 |
|
|
|
44,294 |
|
|
|
17,917 |
|
|
|
14,016 |
|
|
|
9,123 |
|
|
|
5,869 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
57,573 |
|
|
|
78,450 |
|
|
|
105,151 |
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
|
|
24,187 |
|
|
|
20,898 |
|
|
|
18,689 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
183,935 |
|
|
|
68,557 |
|
|
|
134,223 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
16,887 |
|
|
|
19,327 |
|
|
|
22,325 |
|
|
|
5,980 |
|
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
|
3,398 |
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
68,814 |
|
|
|
91,884 |
|
|
|
170,795 |
|
|
|
20,987 |
|
|
|
15,994 |
|
|
|
14,946 |
|
|
|
13,040 |
|
Income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(2,219 |
) |
|
|
(13,425 |
) |
|
|
23,908 |
|
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
3,134 |
|
|
|
2,870 |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(176,070 |
) |
|
|
(49,239 |
) |
|
|
(201,450 |
) |
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
|
6,811 |
|
|
|
6,036 |
|
|
|
5,507 |
|
Less: Cumulative Preferred Stock dividend and accretion |
|
|
(112,114 |
) |
|
|
7,319 |
|
|
|
8,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
|
|
(64,539 |
) |
|
|
(56,558 |
) |
|
|
(210,139 |
) |
|
$ |
7,175 |
|
|
$ |
6,811 |
|
|
$ |
6,036 |
|
|
$ |
5,507 |
|
|
|
|
Per Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
(2.63 |
) |
|
|
(2.60 |
) |
|
|
(9.63 |
) |
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
(2.63 |
) |
|
|
(2.60 |
) |
|
|
(9.63 |
) |
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
Tangible book value per common share |
|
|
.23 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
|
(1.03 |
) |
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
7.14 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
Basic weighted average shares |
|
|
24,546,337 |
|
|
|
21,774,620 |
|
|
|
21,816,407 |
|
|
|
11,960,604 |
|
|
|
10,228,638 |
|
|
|
9,092,980 |
|
|
|
8,137,244 |
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
24,546,337 |
|
|
|
21,774,620 |
|
|
|
21,816,407 |
|
|
|
12,074,725 |
|
|
|
10,431,554 |
|
|
|
9,275,788 |
|
|
|
8,407,821 |
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
684,680,352 |
|
|
|
21,868,956 |
|
|
|
22,154,320 |
|
|
|
21,777,937 |
|
|
|
10,314,899 |
|
|
|
10,251,336 |
|
|
|
8,242,822 |
|
S-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of, and for the |
|
|
As of, and for the |
|
|
As of, and for the |
|
|
As of, and for the |
|
|
As of, and for the |
|
|
|
As of, and for the |
|
|
As of, and for the |
|
|
Period |
|
|
Period |
|
|
Period |
|
|
Period |
|
|
Period |
|
Selected |
|
Period |
|
|
Period |
|
|
Ended, |
|
|
Ended, |
|
|
Ended, |
|
|
Ended, |
|
|
Ended, |
|
Operating Ratios |
|
Ended, |
|
|
Ended, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
and Other Data: |
|
Sept. 30, 2010 |
|
|
Sept. 30, 2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets |
|
|
(2.99 |
)% |
|
|
(2.45 |
)% |
|
|
(6.84 |
)% |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
Return on average common equity |
|
NM |
|
|
|
(35.39 |
) |
|
|
(115.38 |
) |
|
|
7.63 |
|
|
|
9.52 |
|
|
|
10.47 |
|
|
|
12.28 |
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
|
3.17 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
Noninterest income to total net revenue |
|
|
22.68 |
|
|
|
19.77 |
|
|
|
17.51 |
|
|
|
17.99 |
|
|
|
12.45 |
|
|
|
13.99 |
|
|
|
14.67 |
|
Noninterest expense (annualized) to average assets |
|
|
3.19 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
Efficiency ratio |
|
|
92.42 |
|
|
|
93.97 |
|
|
|
138.63 |
|
|
|
63.14 |
|
|
|
57.89 |
|
|
|
61.52 |
|
|
|
59.54 |
|
Dividend payout ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.33 |
|
|
|
64.18 |
|
|
|
75.76 |
|
|
|
52.94 |
|
Asset Quality Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
|
|
15.56 |
|
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
Loans more than 90 days past due and still accruing interest to total loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Nonaccrual loans to total loans |
|
|
15.56 |
|
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets (1) |
|
|
11.91 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
|
|
|
8.81 |
|
|
|
1.34 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
Net loans charged-off (recovered) to average total loans |
|
|
7.77 |
|
|
|
.80 |
|
|
|
(2.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
7.77 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans |
|
|
49.94 |
|
|
|
56.47 |
|
|
|
53.44 |
|
|
|
141.86 |
|
|
|
190.69 |
|
|
|
239.94 |
|
|
|
197.53 |
|
Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share |
|
|
.25 |
|
|
|
6.94 |
|
|
$ |
(0.45 |
) |
|
$ |
9.70 |
|
|
$ |
7.14 |
|
|
$ |
6.84 |
|
|
$ |
5.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market price at period end |
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
2.88 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
$ |
8.73 |
|
|
$ |
12.56 |
|
|
$ |
12.00 |
|
|
$ |
10.65 |
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of bank financial centers |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Full time equivalent employees |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total nonperforming assets do not include repossessed automobiles, which were not
material. |
S-47
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion provides additional information about the important factors affecting
our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, capital resources and liquidity. In
addition to identifying trends and material changes that occurred during the reporting periods,
this Prospectus depicts the successes achieved by the organization. This discussion and analysis
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Overview
Throughout 2009 and into the first nine months of 2010, economic conditions in the markets in
which our borrowers operate continued to deteriorate and the levels of loan delinquencies and
defaults that we experienced were substantially higher than historical levels. Our loan customers
continue to operate in an economically stressed environment. The Company reported a net loss for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of a significant increase
to our provision for loan losses. Additionally, the Company determined that a valuation
allowance on its deferred tax assets should be recognized beginning as of December 31, 2009.
Management believes the Company, Bank of Hampton Roads, and Shore Bank to be well-capitalized
under applicable banking regulations as of September 30, 2010.
Our primary source of revenue is net interest income earned by our bank subsidiaries. Net
interest income represents interest and fees earned from lending and investment activities, less
the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Net interest income may be impacted by variations
in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, changes in the
yields earned and the rates paid, level of non-performing interest-earning assets, and the levels
of noninterest-bearing liabilities available to support earning assets. Our net interest income
in recent years has been negatively impacted by increasing levels of non-performing loans. In
addition to net interest income, noninterest income is another important source of revenue.
Noninterest income is derived primarily from service charges on deposits and fees earned from
bank services, investment, mortgage, and insurance activities. Other factors that impact net
income are the provision for loan losses, noninterest expense, and the provision for income
taxes.
The following is a summary of our condition as of September 30, 2010 and our financial
performance for the three and nine month period then ended.
|
|
|
Assets were $3.1 billion. They increased by $148.0 million or 5% for the
first nine months of 2010 from December 31, 2009. This was primarily the result of an
increase in overnight funds sold and due from Federal Reserve Bank of 4% offset by a
13% decrease in loans during that period. |
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale increased $7.7 million to $168.8
million for the first nine months of 2010. Investments purchased during 2010 were
low-risk weighted mortgage-backed and agency securities. |
|
|
|
Loans decreased by $325.6 million or 13% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as loan paydowns and charge-offs exceeded the volume of new
originations. New loan activity continues to be low as a result of our tighter
underwriting criteria and economic conditions. |
|
|
|
Deposits increased $98.1 million or 4% as new customer deposit activity
including national rate board deposits more than offset the decline in brokered
deposits. |
S-48
|
|
|
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company completed a stock
offering in which 587,500,000 new shares of Common Stock were issued at $0.40 per share
for an infusion of $210.0 million of capital net of $25.0 million in issuance costs.
In connection with this capital raise, existing preferred stock was converted to Common
Stock creating income to common shareholders of $111.7 million. All preferred stock
was exchanged for or converted into Common Stock in the third quarter so this type of
income will not reoccur in the future. |
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 was $30.0 million or $1.02 per common diluted share, and net loss
available to common shareholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $64.5
million or $2.63 per common diluted share, respectively, as compared with net loss
available to common shareholders of $14.7 million or $0.68 per common diluted share and
$56.6 million or $2.60 per common diluted share for the three and nine months,
respectively, ended September 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
The net loss of $176.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
was primarily attributable to provision for loan losses expense of $183.9 million. |
|
|
|
Net interest income decreased $8.5 million and $20.9 million for the three
and nine months, respectively, ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period
in 2009. This was primarily the result of the decrease in interest income from loans. |
|
|
|
Noninterest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010
was $6.0 million and $16.9 million, respectively, an 17% and 13% decrease over the
comparative periods in 2009. An increase in mortgage banking revenue partially offset
the increased losses on foreclosed assets. |
|
|
|
Noninterest expense was $24.8 million and $68.8 million for the three and
nine months, respectively, ended September 30, 2010, which was an increase of $3.1
million or 14% and a decrease of $23.1 million or 25% over the comparable periods for
2009. |
Critical Accounting Policies
GAAP requires management to apply significant judgment to various accounting, reporting, and
disclosure matters. Management must use assumptions, judgments, and estimates when applying these
principles where precise measurements are not possible or practical. These policies are critical
because they are highly dependent upon subjective or complex judgments, assumptions, and
estimates. Changes in such judgments, assumptions, and estimates may have a significant impact
on the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying footnotes. Actual results, in fact,
could differ from those estimates. We consider our policies on allowance for loan losses,
deferred income taxes, and estimates of fair value on financial instruments to be critical
accounting policies. Refer to our 2009 Form 10-K, as amended, for further discussion of these
policies.
Material Trends and Uncertainties
The global and U.S. economies have experienced a protracted slowdown in business activity,
including high levels of unemployment, resulting in a lack of confidence in the worldwide credit
markets and in the financial system. Currently, the U.S. economy appears to be slowly recovering
from one of its longest economic recessions in recent history. It is not clear at this time how
quickly the economy will recover and whether regulatory and legislative efforts to stimulate job
growth and spending will be successful.
S-49
We experienced a significant deterioration in credit quality in 2009 that continues into 2010.
Problem loans and non-performing assets rose and led us to significantly increase the allowance
for loan losses. To bolster our allowance, we increased the provision for loan losses to $183.9
million in the first nine months of 2010 from $68.6 million in the first nine months of 2009.
The increased expense contributed to a net loss available to common shareholders of $64.5 million
for the first nine months of 2010. In light of continued economic weakness, problem credits may
continue to rise and significant additional provisions for loan losses may be necessary to
supplement the allowance for loan losses in the future. As a result, we may incur significant
credit costs throughout 2010, which would continue to adversely impact our financial condition,
our results of operations, and the value of our Common Stock.
The Company determined that a valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets should be recognized
beginning December 31, 2009 because it is uncertain whether it will realize this asset. Section
382 limitations related to the capital raised during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 add
further uncertainty to the realizability of the deferred tax assets in future periods.
On November 2, 2010, the Company received from the United States Department of Justice, Criminal
Division a grand jury subpoena to produce information principally relating to the merger of
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. into the Company on December 31, 2008 and to loans made by
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Gateway Bank & Trust before
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.s merger with the Company. The United States Department of
Justice, Criminal Division has informed the Company that it is not a target of the investigation
at this time, and we are fully cooperating. Although we do not believe this matter will have a
material adverse affect on the Company, we can give you no assurances as to the timing or
eventual outcome of this investigation.
Analysis of Financial Condition
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents includes cash and due from banks,
interest-bearing deposits in other banks, and overnight funds sold and due from the Federal
Reserve Bank. Cash and cash equivalents are used for daily cash management purposes, management
of short-term interest rate opportunities, and liquidity. Cash and cash equivalents as of
September 30, 2010 were $661.0 million and consisted mainly of deposits with the Federal Reserve
Bank. These deposits increased $461.0 million in the first nine months of 2010 from $200.0
million at December 31, 2009 as the Company increased deposits and decreased loan balances
resulting in increased cash balances. The Company elected to maximize liquidity by investing the
increased cash in overnight funds at the Federal Reserve Bank. In addition, the Company received
$235.0 million in gross cash proceeds from its recapitalization.
Securities. Our investment portfolio consists primarily of available-for-sale mortgage-backed
securities. Our available-for-sale securities are reported at estimated fair value. They are
used primarily for liquidity, pledging, earnings, and asset/liability management purposes and are
reviewed quarterly for possible impairment. The mortgage-backed securities consisted of
Government National Mortgage Association pass-through securities or collateralized mortgage
obligations.
At September 30, 2010, the estimated fair value of our investment securities was $168.8 million,
an increase of $7.7 million or 5% from $161.1 million at December 31, 2009. Our investment
portfolio was restructured during late 2009 to increase regulatory capital ratios by selling high
risk-weighted securities and reinvesting the proceeds into lower risk-weighted securities.
Loan Portfolio. Our loan portfolio is comprised of commercial, construction, real
estate-commercial mortgage, real estate-residential mortgage, and installment loans to
individuals.
S-50
Lending decisions are based upon an evaluation of the repaying capacity, financial strength, and credit history of the
borrower, the quality and value of the collateral securing each loan, and the financial strength
of guarantors. With few exceptions, personal guarantees are required on loans. Our loan
portfolio decreased $325.6 million or 13% to $2.1 billion as of September 30, 2010 compared to
December 31, 2009. Commercial loans decreased 12% to $317.6 million at September 30, 2010
compared with $361.3 million at December 31, 2009. Real estate commercial mortgages decreased 8%
to $677.8 million at September 30, 2010 compared to $740.6 million at December 31, 2009. Real
estate residential mortgages decreased 3% to $511.2 million at September 30, 2010 as compared
with $524.9 million at December 31, 2009. Installment loans to individuals decreased 19% to
$34.7 million at September 30, 2010 compared with $42.9 million at December 31, 2009.
Construction loans also decreased 26% to $560.2 million at September 30, 2010 as compared with
$757.7 million at December 31, 2009, thus lowering the concentration of construction loans to 27%
of the total loan portfolio at September 30, 2010 compared with 31% at December 31, 2009.
Within the construction segment of the loan portfolio as of September 30, 2010, Bank of Hampton
Roads has exposure to $57.5 million of loans in which interest payments are satisfied through the
use of a reserve that was funded by Bank of Hampton Roads upon origination and represents a
portion of the borrowers total liability to Bank of Hampton Roads. In the instance of
commercial construction, ultimate repayment is dependent upon stabilization of the funded
project; whereas, in residential development, Bank of Hampton Roads is assigned a certain
percentage of each sale to retire a commensurate portion of the outstanding debt. Each interest
reserve transaction is monitored by the account officer, a senior credit officer, and credit
administration to verify the continuation of project viability as it relates to remaining
interest reserve and additional financial capacity of the project sponsor. In certain instances,
where either or both criteria have been deemed unsatisfactory, the borrowers access to any
remaining interest reserve has been curtailed on at least a temporary basis until Bank of Hampton
Roads special assets department has been engaged to further evaluate possible resolutions.
Although we are no longer making new loans to finance construction and land development, we have
a high concentration of construction and real estate, both commercial and residential, loans.
Construction loans have been made to individuals and businesses for the purpose of construction
of single family residential properties, multi-family properties, and commercial projects such as
the development of residential neighborhoods and commercial office parks. Risk is reduced on
these loans by limiting lending for speculative building of both residential and commercial
properties based upon the borrowers history with us, financial strength, and the loan-to-value
ratio of such speculative property. We generally require new and renewed variable-rate
commercial loans to have interest rate floors. Residential loans represent smaller dollar loans
to more customers, and therefore, have lower credit risk than other types of loans. The majority
of our fixed-rate residential mortgage loans, which represent increased interest rate risk, as
well as some variable rate mortgage loans are sold in the secondary market. The remainder of the
variable-rate mortgage loans and a small number of fixed-rate mortgage loans are retained.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The purpose of the allowance for loan losses is to provide for
probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio. Management regularly reviews our loan portfolio
to determine whether adjustments are necessary. Our review takes into consideration changes in
the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific
problem loans, and review of current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers ability
to repay. In addition to the review of credit quality through ongoing credit review processes,
we construct a comprehensive allowance analysis for our loan portfolio at least quarterly. This
allowance includes specific allowances for individual loans; general allowance for loan pools,
which factor in our historical loan loss experience,
loan portfolio growth and trends, and economic conditions; and unallocated allowances predicated
upon both internal and external factors.
S-51
The allowance for loan losses was $163.3 million or 7.77% of outstanding loans as of September
30, 2010 compared with $132.7 million or 5.47% of outstanding loans as of December 31, 2009. We
increased the allowance for loan losses $30.6 million (net of charge-offs and recoveries) during
the first nine months of 2010. Pooled loan allocations increased to $53.1 million at September
30, 2010 from $34.1 million at December 31, 2009. Allowance coverage for the non-impaired
portfolio is determined using a methodology that incorporates historical loss rates and risk
ratings by loan category. Loss rates are based on a three-year weighted average with recent
period loss rates weighted more heavily. We then apply an adjustment factor to each loss rate
based on assessments of loss trends, collateral values, and economic and business influences
impacting expected losses. During the quarter, the weighted historical loss rates for most loan
categories increased due to recent charge-off activity resulting in an increase in the loss
factors for most loan types and an increase in pooled loan allocations. Specific loan
allocations increased to $101.1 million at September 30, 2010 from $91.5 million at December 31,
2009. Specific loan allocations increased due to a decrease in collateral values of certain
collateral dependent loans and due to the estimated losses of recently identified impaired loans.
Unallocated allowances increased to $9.1 million at September 30, 2010 from $7.2 million at
December 31, 2009. The following table provides a breakdown of the allowance for loan losses and
other related information (in thousands) at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled component |
|
$ |
53,057 |
|
|
$ |
34,050 |
|
Specific component |
|
|
101,127 |
|
|
|
91,488 |
|
Unallocated component |
|
|
9,069 |
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
163,253 |
|
|
$ |
132,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
432,466 |
|
|
$ |
469,068 |
|
Non-impaired loans |
|
|
1,668,619 |
|
|
|
1,957,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
2,101,085 |
|
|
$ |
2,426,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled component as % of
non-impaired loans |
|
|
3.18 |
% |
|
|
1.74 |
% |
Specific component as % of
impaired loans |
|
|
23.38 |
% |
|
|
19.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance as a % of loans |
|
|
7.77 |
% |
|
|
5.47 |
% |
Allowance as a % of nonaccrual loans |
|
|
49.94 |
% |
|
|
53.44 |
% |
The specific allowance for loan losses necessary for impaired loans is based on a
loan-by-loan analysis and varies between impaired loans largely due to the level of collateral.
Additionally, pooled loan allocations vary depending on a number of assumptions and trends. As a
result, the ratio of allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans is not sufficient for
measuring the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The following table provides additional
ratios that measure our allowance for loan losses.
S-52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Non-performing loans for which full loss
has been charged off to total loans |
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans for which full loss
has been charged off to non-performing
loans |
|
|
20.35 |
% |
|
|
8.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge off rate for nonperforming loans
which the full loss has been charged off |
|
|
52.32 |
% |
|
|
42.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage ratio net of nonperforming loans
for which the full loss has been charged off |
|
|
62.69 |
% |
|
|
58.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance divided by total loans less
nonperforming loans for which the full loss
has been charged off |
|
|
8.02 |
% |
|
|
5.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for individually impaired loans
divided by impaired loans for which an
allowance has been provided |
|
|
32.63 |
% |
|
|
27.60 |
% |
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that all amounts due will not be collected
according to the contractual terms. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the
allowance. Impairment is evaluated in the aggregate for smaller balance loans of similar nature
and on an individual loan basis for other loans. If a loan is considered impaired, it is
measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans
effective interest rate or at the loans observable market price or the fair value of the
collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Total impaired loans were $432.5 million at
September 30, 2010, a decrease of $36.6 million or 8% over December 31, 2009. Of these loans,
$326.9 million were on nonaccrual status at September 30, 2010. Net charge-offs were $153.4
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with $20.6 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009.
Non-Performing Loans. Non-performing loans consist of nonaccrual loans and loans 90 days past
due and still accruing interest. There were no loans 90 days past due and still accruing
interest as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Total nonaccrual loans aggregated
$326.9 million at September 30, 2010 as compared with $248.3 million at December 31, 2009.
The following chart summarizes our nonaccrual loans by loan type as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
24,860 |
|
|
$ |
24,803 |
|
Construction |
|
|
199,042 |
|
|
|
150,325 |
|
Real estate commercial mortgage |
|
|
66,387 |
|
|
|
50,858 |
|
Real estate residential mortgage |
|
|
35,842 |
|
|
|
22,146 |
|
Installment loans (to individuals) |
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
326,910 |
|
|
$ |
248,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits. Deposits are the primary source of funding for the Company. Total deposits at
September 30, 2010 increased $98.1 million or 4% to $2.6 billion as compared with December 31,
2009. Total brokered deposits were $191.4 million or 7% of deposits at September 30, 2010, which
was a decrease of $195.0 million from the total brokered deposits of $386.4 million or 15% of
deposits at December 31, 2009. Interest-bearing demand deposits included $17.3 million brokered
money market funds at
S-53
September 30, 2010, which was $30.3 million lower than the $47.6 million
balance of brokered money market funds outstanding at December 31, 2009. Brokered CDs
represented $174.1 million, which was a decrease of $164.7 million over the $338.8 million of
brokered CDs outstanding at December 31, 2009. Changes in the deposit categories include an increase of $3.4 million or 1% in
noninterest-bearing demand deposits, a decrease of $145.5 million or 16% in interest-bearing
demand deposits, and a decrease of $9.8 million or 12% in savings accounts from December 31, 2009
to September 30, 2010. Total time deposits under $100 thousand decreased $111.6 million from
$889.8 million at December 31, 2009 to $778.2 million at September 30, 2010. Time deposits over
$100 thousand increased $361.6
million from $356.8 million at December 31, 2009 to $718.4 million at September 30, 2010
primarily due to certificates of deposit obtained from the national rate board postings during
the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Going forward, management intends to focus on core
deposit growth as our primary source of funding.
Borrowings. We use short-term and long-term borrowings from various sources including the FHLB,
funds purchased from correspondent banks, reverse repurchase accounts, and trust preferred
securities. Our FHLB borrowings on September 30, 2010 were $219.2 million compared to $228.2
million at December 31, 2009.
Capital Resources. Total shareholders equity increased $43.5 million or 35% to $168.5 million
at September 30, 2010 compared to $125.0 million at December 31, 2009. The increase in
shareholders equity was primarily a result of the $235.0 million capital infusion partially
offset by the $176.7 million net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
During 2009, we paid two quarterly cash dividends of $0.11 per share on our Common Stock to
shareholders of record as of February 27, 2009 and May 15, 2009. To preserve capital, on July
30, 2009 the Board of Directors voted to suspend the quarterly dividend on the Companys Common
Stock. Our ability to distribute cash dividends in the future may be limited by regulatory
restrictions and the need to maintain sufficient consolidated capital.
In January 2010, the Company exercised its right to defer all quarterly distributions on the
trust preferred securities (in thousands) it assumed in connection with its merger with GFH
(collectively, the Trust Preferred Securities), which are identified below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Interest |
|
Redeemable |
|
Mandatory |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Rate |
|
On Or After |
|
Redemption |
Gateway Capital Statutory Trust I
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 3.10%
|
|
September 17, 2008
|
|
September 17, 2033 |
Gateway Capital Statutory Trust II
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 2.65%
|
|
July 17, 2009
|
|
June 17, 2034 |
Gateway Capital Statutory Trust III
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 1.50%
|
|
May 30, 2011
|
|
May 30, 2036 |
Gateway Capital Statutory Trust IV
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 1.55%
|
|
July 30, 2012
|
|
July 30, 2037 |
Interest payable under the Trust Preferred Securities continues to accrue during the
deferral period and interest on the deferred interest also accrues, both of which must be paid at
the end of the deferral period and totaled $1.1 million at September 30, 2010. Prior to the
expiration of the deferral period, the Company has the right to further defer interest payments,
provided that no deferral period, together with all prior deferrals, exceeds 20 consecutive
quarters and that no event of default (as defined by the terms of the applicable Trust Preferred
Securities) has occurred and is continuing at the time of the deferral. The Company was not in
default with respect to the terms of the Trust Preferred Securities at the time the quarterly
payments were deferred and such deferrals did not cause an event of default under the terms of
the Trust Preferred Securities.
S-54
We have taken additional actions to preserve capital. As part of a plan to recapitalize the
Company, on August 11, 2010, the Investors and the Company entered into the Investment Agreements
to purchase 637,500,000 shares of Common Stock for $0.40 per share as part of the aggregate
$255.0 million Private Placement. See Questions and Answers Relating to the Offering Why are
we conducting the Rights Offering? beginning on page S-7 of this Prospectus and Prospectus
Summary Recent Developments Implementation of the Initial Portion of our Recapitalization
Plan beginning on page
S-16 of this Prospectus. Prior to the First Closing of the Private Placement, the Company was
required to conduct offers to exchange each outstanding share of Series A and Series B preferred
stock for Common Stock and conduct a separate exchange offer with the Treasury.
On September 29, 2010, the Company completed Exchange Offers with holders of the Companys
previously outstanding Series A and Series B preferred stock, resulting in the issuance of 375
newly issued shares of Common Stock for each such share of preferred stock tendered. Of the
23,266 previously outstanding shares of Series A preferred stock and 37,550 previously
outstanding shares of Series B preferred stock, all but 2,200 Shares of Series A preferred stock
and 200 shares of Series B preferred stock were tendered in the Exchange Offers, resulting in the
issuance of 21,906,000 shares of Common Stock on September 29, 2010.
Pursuant to amendments to the series designations of the Series A and B preferred holders
approved by shareholders on September 28, 2010, on September 30, 2010, the Company sent
irrevocable conversion notices to all remaining holders of shares of Series A and Series B
preferred stock not tendered in the Exchange Offers. Upon conversion, each share of Series A and
Series B preferred stock was automatically cancelled and converted into the right to receive 375
common shares upon delivery of the Series A and Series B preferred stock certificates to the
Company, for an aggregate issuance of 900,000 common shares.
In addition, the Investment Agreements required the exchange of the 80,347 shares of Series C
preferred stock held by the Treasury for shares of a newly-created Series C-1 preferred stock and
the conversion of such Series C-1 preferred shares into 52,225,550 shares of Common Stock prior
to the First Closing of the Private Placement, which occurred on September 30, 2010. As a part
of this series of transactions, the terms of the warrant held by Treasury were amended to provide
for the purchase of up to 1,325,858 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per
share for a ten-year term following the issuance of the amended warrant.
The Investment Agreements also require that following the First Closing, the Company will
commence a Rights Offering providing holders of Common Stock with a non-transferable right to
purchase newly issued shares of Common Stock at $0.40 per share, the same price paid by the
Investors and Treasury. The Rights Offering is expected to raise an additional $40 million.
On September 30, 2010, the Company issued $235.0 million worth of common shares, or 587,500,000
shares, at a price of $0.40 per share. The remaining $20 million of the Private Placement is
expected to close by the fourth quarter of 2010 contemporaneously with the Rights Offering.
We are subject to regulatory risk-based capital guidelines that measure capital relative to
risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet financial instruments. Tier I capital is comprised of
shareholders equity, net of unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities, less
intangible assets, while total risk-based capital adds certain debt instruments and qualifying
allowances for loan losses. As of September 30, 2010, our consolidated regulatory capital ratios
are Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of 6.32%, Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio of 9.43%, and Total
Risk-Based Capital of 10.77%. As of September 30, 2010, we believe the Company, Bank of Hampton
Roads, and Shore Bank to be well-capitalized under applicable banking regulations.
S-55
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet
risk in the normal course of business to meet our customers financing needs. For more
information on our off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 15, Financial Instruments with
Off-Balance-Sheet Risk, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the 2009
Form 10-K, as amended.
Contractual Obligations. Our contractual obligations consist of time deposits, borrowings, and
operating lease obligations. There have not been any significant changes in our contractual
obligations from those disclosed in the 2009 Form 10-K, as amended.
Analysis of Results of Operations
Overview. Our net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended September
30, 2010 was $30.0 million as compared with net loss available to common shareholders of $14.7
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. During the first nine months of 2010, we
incurred a net loss available to common shareholders of $64.5 million, compared to the net loss
available to common shareholders of $56.6 million for the first nine months of 2009. The loss
available to common shareholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was driven by
provision for loan losses expense of $183.9 million necessary to maintain the allowance for loan
losses at a level necessary to cover expected losses inherent in the loan portfolio partially
offset by the benefit to common shareholders from the exchange and conversion of preferred stock
to Common Stock which added $111.7 million of income available to common shareholders. Diluted
income per common share for the three months was $1.02 and diluted loss per common share for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $2.63, an increased gain of $1.70 over the diluted loss
per common share of $0.68 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and an increased loss of
$0.03 over the diluted loss per common share of $2.60 for the three months ended September 30,
2009.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income, a major component of our earnings, is the difference
between the income generated by interest-earning assets reduced by the cost of interest-bearing
liabilities. Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $17.9
million, a decrease of $8.5 million from the three months ended September 30, 2009. Net interest
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $57.6 million, a decrease of $20.9
million from the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in net interest income was
primarily the result of a decrease in interest income from loans of $21.7 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The net
interest margin, which is calculated by expressing annualized net interest income as a percentage
of average interest-earning assets, is an indicator of effectiveness in generating income from
earning assets. Our net interest margin decreased to 3.10% for the first nine months ended
September 30, 2010 from 3.75% during the first nine months of 2009. The net interest margin was
2.90% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 3.80% for the three months ended
September 30, 2009. The decline in net interest margin from prior periods is due primarily to
increased levels of nonaccrual loans and the effect of purchase accounting adjustments which
inflated net interest income and subsequently net interest margin in 2009.
Our interest-earning assets consist of loans, investment securities, overnight funds sold and due
from Federal Reserve Bank, and interest-bearing deposits in other banks. Interest income on
loans, including fees, decreased $8.2 million and $21.7 million to $27.7 million and $88.1
million for the three and nine months, respectively, ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the
same time periods during 2009. These decreases were a result of decreases in average loan
balances and an increase in nonaccrual loans.
S-56
Interest income on investment securities increased
$111 thousand and $192 thousand for the three and nine months, respectively, ended September 30,
2010 compared to the same time period during 2009. Interest income on interest-bearing deposits
in other banks decreased $9 thousand and $200 thousand for the three and nine month periods,
respectively, ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same time period during 2009. Interest
income on overnight funds sold and due from Federal Reserve Bank increased $208 thousand and $462
thousand for the three and nine months, respectively, ended September 30, 2010 compared to the
same time period during 2009. During 2010, as loan balances decreased and deposit balances
increased, the Company elected to maximize liquidity by increasing its deposit balance at the
Federal Reserve Bank.
Our interest-bearing liabilities consist of deposit accounts and borrowings. Interest expense on
deposits increased $901 thousand and $1.8 million to $9.4 million and $29.7 million for the three
and nine months, respectively, ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same time periods during
2009. This increase resulted from a $284.8 million increase in average interest-bearing
deposits, offset by an 11-basis point decrease in the average interest rate on deposits for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This
decrease in our average deposit rates resulted in large part from declining rates on certificates
of deposits and savings deposits. A reduction of our average rate on time deposits to 1.91% for
the first nine months of 2010 from 2.31% for the first nine months of 2009 contributed
significantly toward the decrease in overall deposit rates. Interest expense on borrowings,
which consisted of FHLB borrowings, other borrowings, and overnight funds purchased decreased
$259 thousand and $2.0 million for the three and nine months, respectively, ended September 30,
2010 compared to the same time periods during 2009. The $155.4 million decrease in the nine
month average borrowings and partially offset by the 51-basis point increase in the average
interest rate on borrowings produced this result.
The tables below present the average interest-earning assets and average interest-bearing
liabilities, the average yields earned on such assets and rates paid on such liabilities, and the
net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009.
S-57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
2010 Compared to 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Attributable to |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
1,879,696 |
|
|
$ |
109,920 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
% |
|
$ |
2,557,046 |
|
|
$ |
142,461 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
% |
|
$ |
(32,541 |
) |
|
$ |
6,816 |
|
|
$ |
(39,357 |
) |
Investment securities |
|
|
197,719 |
|
|
|
6,204 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
148,518 |
|
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
% |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
(1,234 |
) |
|
|
1,677 |
|
Interest-bearing
deposits in other banks |
|
|
68,964 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
12,050 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
136 |
|
Overnight funds sold
and due from FRB |
|
|
307,463 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
48,084 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
% |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-earning
assets |
|
|
2,453,842 |
|
|
|
117,022 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
% |
|
|
2,765,698 |
|
|
|
148,329 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
(31,307 |
) |
|
|
5,644 |
|
|
|
(36,951 |
) |
Noninterest-earning assets |
|
|
444,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,898,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,979,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
deposits |
|
|
791,313 |
|
|
|
9,415 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
609,497 |
|
|
|
5,848 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
% |
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
74,480 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
110,196 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
% |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(254 |
) |
Time deposits |
|
|
1,459,547 |
|
|
|
27,257 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
1,349,920 |
|
|
|
26,808 |
|
|
|
1.99 |
% |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
2,325,340 |
|
|
|
37,139 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
% |
|
|
2,069,613 |
|
|
|
33,564 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
% |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
3,825 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
272,685 |
|
|
|
8,696 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
340,363 |
|
|
|
9,720 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
(2,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
2,598,025 |
|
|
|
45,835 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
% |
|
|
2,409,976 |
|
|
|
43,284 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
Noninterest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
247,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
22,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
noninterest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
270,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,868,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,680,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
30,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
and shareholders
equity |
|
$ |
2,898,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,979,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
71,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
105,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Interest income from loans included fees of $204 at September 30, 2010 and $1,324 at September 30, 2009. Average nonaccrual loans of $357 are excluded from average loans at September 30,
2010. Average nonaccrual loans for September 30, 2009 were not material and are included in average loans above.
|
S-58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
2010 Compared to 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Attributable to |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
1,973,677 |
|
|
$ |
117,827 |
|
|
|
5.97 |
% |
|
$ |
2,586,189 |
|
|
$ |
146,257 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
$ |
(28,430 |
) |
|
$ |
7,597 |
|
|
$ |
(36,027 |
) |
Investment securities |
|
|
202,703 |
|
|
|
6,666 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
161,462 |
|
|
|
6,385 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
(1,203 |
) |
|
|
1,484 |
|
Interest-bearing
deposits in other banks |
|
|
57,497 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
7,749 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
122 |
|
Overnight funds sold
and due from FRB |
|
|
248,092 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
38,351 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
% |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-earning
assets |
|
|
2,481,969 |
|
|
|
125,164 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
2,793,751 |
|
|
|
152,722 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
% |
|
|
(27,558 |
) |
|
|
6,427 |
|
|
|
(33,985 |
) |
Noninterest-earning assets |
|
|
395,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,877,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,074,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
deposits |
|
$ |
887,763 |
|
|
$ |
13,422 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
% |
|
$ |
629,092 |
|
|
$ |
6,255 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
$ |
7,167 |
|
|
$ |
3,952 |
|
|
$ |
3,215 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
77,483 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
117,479 |
|
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
% |
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
(352 |
) |
Time deposits |
|
|
1,350,176 |
|
|
|
25,730 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
1,284,089 |
|
|
|
29,565 |
|
|
|
2.31 |
% |
|
|
(3,835 |
) |
|
|
(5,331 |
) |
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
2,315,422 |
|
|
|
39,650 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
% |
|
|
2,030,660 |
|
|
|
37,087 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
% |
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
(1,796 |
) |
|
|
4,359 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
275,212 |
|
|
|
8,539 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
430,611 |
|
|
|
11,130 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
% |
|
|
(2,591 |
) |
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
(3,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
2,590,634 |
|
|
|
48,189 |
|
|
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|
2,461,271 |
|
|
|
48,217 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
% |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
686 |
|
Noninterest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
245,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
23,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
noninterest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
269,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,860,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,745,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
17,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
and shareholders
equity |
|
$ |
2,877,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,074,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
104,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Interest income from loans included fees of $567 at September 30, 2010 and $1,747 at September 30, 2009. Average nonaccrual loans of $357 are excluded from average loans at September 30, 2010. Average
nonaccrual loans for September 30, 2009 were not material and are included in average loans above.
|
S-59
Noninterest Income.
The following tables provide an analysis of noninterest income (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
$ |
2,054 |
|
|
$ |
5,029 |
|
|
$ |
6,186 |
|
Mortgage banking revenue |
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
8,621 |
|
|
|
3,717 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of investment securities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
2,695 |
|
Gain on sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets |
|
|
(2,914 |
) |
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
(6,128 |
) |
|
|
(880 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairment of securities |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(343 |
) |
Insurance revenue |
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
3,894 |
|
Brokerage revenue |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
Income from bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
Visa check card income |
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
ATM surcharge fee |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
Wire fees |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
Other |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
5,955 |
|
|
$ |
7,232 |
|
|
$ |
16,887 |
|
|
$ |
19,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, total noninterest income was $6.0 million, a
decrease of $1.3 million or 18% as compared to third quarter 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, we reported total noninterest income of $16.9 million, a $2.4 million or 13%
decrease over the same period in 2009. Noninterest income comprised 23% of total revenue for
the first nine months of 2010 and 14% for the first nine months of 2009.
Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $1.2 million or 19% to $5.0 million for the first
nine months of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 due to reduced overdraft activity along
with a change in policy reducing the number of overdraft charges a customer can incur on any
given day. Mortgage banking revenue, which is primarily the income associated with originating
and selling first lien residential real estate loans, was $8.6 million in the nine month period
ended September 30, 2010 compared to $3.7 million in the prior year period. This increase was
driven by the higher levels of loan originations in 2010 due to the low interest rate environment
and resulting increase in mortgage refinancing activity. We generated gains on sales of
investment securities of $468 thousand during the first nine months of 2010 compared to $2.7
million for comparative 2009. The deteriorating economy during 2009 and 2010 caused losses on
foreclosed real estate. Losses on foreclosed real estate for the first nine months of 2010 were
$6.1 million compared to $880 thousand for the first nine months of 2009 and were included as a
reduction to noninterest income.
Noninterest Expense.
The following table provides an analysis of total noninterest expense (in thousands) by line item
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
S-60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
12,591 |
|
|
$ |
10,366 |
|
|
$ |
33,296 |
|
|
$ |
32,146 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
6,765 |
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
3,965 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,976 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
4,629 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
3,058 |
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
Problem loan and repossessed asset costs |
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,727 |
|
Bank franchise tax |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
Telephone and postage |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
Stationery, printing, and office supplies |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
Directors and regional board fees |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
5,322 |
|
|
|
7,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
24,779 |
|
|
$ |
21,706 |
|
|
$ |
68,814 |
|
|
$ |
91,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense represents our operating and overhead expenses. Total noninterest
expense increased $3.1 million or 14% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2009. Total noninterest expense decreased $23.1 million or
25% for the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009. The efficiency
ratio, calculated by dividing noninterest expense by the sum of net interest income and
noninterest income excluding securities gains was 93% for the first nine months of 2010 compared
to 97% for the first nine months of 2009. Excluding the goodwill impairment charge, the
efficiency ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 67%.
Salaries and employee benefits expense in 2010 was impacted by increases in mortgage banking
personnel including the joint venture entered into by the mortgage subsidiary. Occupancy expense
increased $449 thousand for the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months of
2009 as a result of property taxes reclassified from equipment expense in 2010 and one new lease
entered into during the first quarter of 2010. Data processing expense decreased $131 thousand
for the first nine months of 2010 compared to the first nine months of 2009 due to hardware and
software becoming fully depreciated during 2010. During the second quarter of 2009, we incurred
a non-cash impairment charge associated with the goodwill created from the Shore acquisition of
$28.0 million. FDIC insurance was $3.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared with $4.6 million for the same period in 2009; the decrease was due to the special
assessment charged in 2009. Equipment expense decreased $648 thousand to $3.1 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 due to the
aforementioned property taxes reclassified to occupancy expense in 2010. For the first nine
months of 2010, professional fees were $4.4 million compared to $505 thousand for comparative
2009. Professional fees increased primarily due to legal and consultant fees associated with
loan collection activities.
Income Tax Provision. Income tax benefit for the third quarter of 2010 was $85 thousand. We
recorded an income tax benefit of $2.2 million for the first nine months of 2010. This benefit
related to expected refunds from amended tax returns for 2007 and 2008 tax years filed during
2010. Management assesses the realizability of the deferred tax asset on a quarterly basis,
considering both positive and negative evidence in determining whether it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the net deferred tax asset would not be realized.
S-61
A valuation allowance for the entire net deferred tax asset has been established as of September 30, 2010.
Section 382 limitations related to the capital raised during the quarter ended September 30, 2010
add further uncertainty to the realizability of the deferred tax assets in future periods.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Management considers interest rate risk to be a significant market risk for the Company.
Fluctuations in interest rates will impact both the level of interest income and interest expense
and the market value of the Companys interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.
The primary goal of the Companys asset/liability management strategy is to optimize net interest
income while limiting exposure to fluctuations caused by changes in the interest rate
environment. The Companys ability to manage its interest rate risk depends generally on the
Companys ability to manage the maturities and re-pricing characteristics of its assets and
liabilities while taking into account the separate goals of maintaining asset quality and
liquidity and achieving the desired level of net interest income.
The Companys management, guided by the Asset/Liability Committee, determines the overall
magnitude of interest sensitivity risk and then formulates policies governing asset generation
and pricing, funding sources and pricing, and off-balance sheet commitments. These decisions are
based on managements expectations regarding future interest rate movements, the state of the
national and regional economy, and other financial and business risk factors.
The primary method that the Company uses to quantify and manage interest rate risk is simulation
analysis, which is used to model net interest income from assets and liabilities over a specified
time period under various interest rate scenarios and balance sheet structures. This analysis
measures the sensitivity of net interest income over a relatively short time horizon. Key
assumptions in the simulation analysis relate to the behavior of interest rates and spreads, the
changes in product balances, and the behavior of loan and deposit customers in different rate
environments.
The expected effect on net interest income for the twelve months following September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 due to an immediate change in interest rates is shown below. These estimates
are dependent on material assumptions, such as those previously discussed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Change in Net Interest Income |
|
|
Change in Net Interest Income |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Change in Interest Rates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+200 basis points |
|
$ |
10,017 |
|
|
|
13.10 |
% |
|
$ |
(4,861 |
) |
|
|
(5.07 |
)% |
+100 basis points |
|
|
4,578 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
% |
|
|
(2,129 |
) |
|
|
(2.22 |
)% |
-100 basis points |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
-200 basis points |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
The above analysis suggests that we project an increase in net interest income assuming an
immediate increase in interest rates. It should be noted, however, that the simulation
analysis is based upon equivalent changes in interest rates for all categories of assets and
liabilities. In normal operating conditions, interest rate changes rarely occur in such a
uniform manner. Many factors affect the timing and magnitude of interest rate changes on
financial instruments. In addition, management may deploy strategies that offset some of the
impact of changes in interest rates.
S-62
Consequently, variations should be expected from the
projections resulting from the controlled conditions of the simulation analysis. Management
maintains a simulation model where it is assumed that interest rate changes occur gradually, that
rate increases for interest-bearing liabilities lag behind the rate increases of interest-earning
assets, and that the level of deposit rate increases will be less than the level of rate
increases for interest-earning assets.
BUSINESS
Overview
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., a Virginia corporation, was incorporated under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Virginia on February 28, 2001, primarily to serve as a holding company for Bank of
Hampton Roads. On July 1, 2001, all Bank of Hampton Roads common stock converted into Hampton Roads
Bankshares, Inc. Common Stock, on a share for share exchange basis, making Bank of Hampton Roads a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In January 2004, we formed Hampton Roads Investments, Inc.,
a wholly-owned subsidiary, to provide securities, brokerage, and investment advisory services. This
subsidiary is currently inactive.
On June 1, 2008, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January
8, 2008 by and between the Company and Shore, the Company acquired via merger all of the
outstanding shares of Shore making Shore Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Shore
Bank has a wholly owned subsidiary, Shore Investments Inc.
On December 31, 2008, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
September 23, 2008 by and between the Company and Gateway, the Company acquired via merger all of
the outstanding shares of Gateway making Gateway Bank a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. On
May 11, 2009, Gateway Bank was dissolved and merged into Bank of Hampton Roads.
Bank of Hampton Roads is a Virginia state-chartered commercial bank with 28 full-service
offices in the Hampton Roads region of southeastern Virginia and 24 full-service offices located in
the Northeastern, Southeastern, and Research Triangle regions of North Carolina and in Richmond,
Virginia that do business as Gateway Bank. Through its acquisition of Gateway, the Bank of Hampton
Roads owns four wholly-owned operating subsidiaries. Gateway Insurance Services, Inc., an insurance
agency with offices in Edenton, Hertford, Elizabeth City, Plymouth, Moyock, and Kitty Hawk, North
Carolina and the Hampton Roads area of Virginia, sells insurance products to businesses and
individuals. Gateway Investment Services, Inc. assists bank customers in their securities brokerage
activities through an arrangement with an unaffiliated broker-dealer. As prescribed by this
arrangement, Gateway Investment Services earns revenue through a commission sharing arrangement
with the unaffiliated broker-dealer. Gateway Bank Mortgage, Inc. provides mortgage banking services
with products that are sold on the secondary market. Gateway Title Agency, Inc. engages in title
insurance and settlement services for real estate transactions. Bank of Hampton Roads commenced
operations in 1987.
Shore Bank is a Virginia state-chartered commercial bank with eight full-service offices
and an investment center located on the Delmarva Peninsula, otherwise known as the Eastern Shore.
Shore Bank operates on the Virginia and Maryland portions of the Eastern Shore, including the
counties of Accomack and Northampton in Virginia and the Pocomoke City and Salisbury market areas
in Maryland. Shore Banks subsidiary, Shore Investments, Inc., provides non-deposit investment
products including stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and insurance products. Shore Investments has an
investment in a Virginia title insurance agency that enables Shore Bank to offer title insurance
policies to its real estate loan customers. Shore commenced operations in 1961.
S-63
Bank of Hampton Roads and Shore Bank may be collectively referred to as the Banks
throughout this document. Our principal executive office is located at 999 Waterside Drive, Suite
200, Norfolk, VA 23510 and our telephone number is (757) 217-1000. Our Common Stock trades on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol HMPR.
Principal Products or Services
We engage in a general community and commercial banking business, targeting the banking needs
of individuals and small- to medium-sized businesses in our primary service areas which include
South Hampton Roads, Virginia, the Northeastern, Southeastern, and Research Triangle regions of
North Carolina, the Eastern Shore of Virginia and Maryland, and Richmond, Virginia. Our principal
business is to attract deposits and to loan to the community or to invest those deposits on
profitable terms. We offer traditional loan and deposit banking services, as well as telephone
banking, Internet banking, remote deposit capture, and debit cards. We accept both commercial and
consumer deposits. These deposits are in varied forms of both demand and time accounts including
checking accounts, interest checking, money market accounts, savings accounts, certificates of
deposit, and IRA accounts. Additionally, we offer a network of seventy-two ATM machines to support
our customers.
We are involved in the construction and real estate lending markets and extend both personal
and commercial credit. Our loans consist of varying terms and can be secured or unsecured. Loans to
individuals are for personal, household, and family purposes. Loans to businesses are for such
purposes as working capital, plant expansion, and equipment purchases. Real estate loans are made
for both residential and commercial properties. Loan revenues, in the form of interest income
including fees, represented 83%, 84%, and 86% of our total consolidated operating revenues for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
Lending Activities
General. We offer a full range of commercial, real estate, and consumer lending products and
services, described in further detail below. Our loan portfolio is comprised of the following
categories: commercial, construction, real estate-commercial mortgage, real estate-residential
mortgage, and installment loans to individuals. Our primary lending objective is to meet business
and consumer needs in our market areas while maintaining our standards of profitability and credit
quality and enhancing client relationships. All lending decisions are based upon a thorough
evaluation of the financial strength and credit history of the borrower and the quality and value
of the collateral securing the loan. With few exceptions, personal guarantees are required on all
loans.
Commercial loans. We make commercial loans to qualified businesses in our market areas.
Commercial loans are loans to businesses which are typically not collateralized by real estate.
Generally, the purpose of commercial loans is for the financing of accounts receivable, inventory,
or equipment and machinery. Repayment of commercial loans may be more substantially dependent upon
the success of the business itself, and therefore, must be monitored more frequently. In order to
reduce our risk, the Banks require regular updates of the businesss financial condition, as well
as that of the guarantors, and regularly monitor accounts receivable and payable of such businesses
when deemed necessary.
Construction loans. Historically, we have made construction and development loans to
individuals and businesses for the purpose of construction of single family residential properties,
multi-family properties, and commercial projects as well as the development of residential
neighborhoods and commercial office parks. Although we are no longer making new loans to finance
construction and land development, a significant amount of our portfolio contains such loans.
S-64
To manage risk on construction and development loans, the Banks funded these loans on an
as-completed basis with experienced bank
representatives inspecting the properties before funding. Larger, more complicated projects require
independent inspections by an architectural or engineering firm approved by the Banks prior to
funding. Additionally, prior to curtailing such lending, risk was being managed in the construction
and development portfolio by limiting additional lending for speculative building of both
residential and commercial properties, based upon the borrowers history with the Banks, financial
strength, and the loan-to-value ratio of such speculative property. The Banks rarely exceeded 80%
loan-to-value on any new construction loan.
Real estate-commercial mortgage. The Banks make commercial mortgage loans for the purchase and
re-financing of owner occupied commercial properties as well as non-owner occupied income producing
properties. These loans are secured by various types of commercial real estate including office,
retail, warehouse, industrial, storage facilities, and other non-residential types of properties.
Commercial mortgage loans typically have maturities or are callable from one to five years.
Underwriting for all commercial mortgages involves an examination of debt service coverage ratios,
the borrowers creditworthiness and past credit history, and the guarantors personal financial
condition. Underwriting for non-owner occupied commercial mortgages also involves evaluation of the
current leases and financial strength of the tenants.
Real estate-residential mortgage. We offer a wide range of residential mortgage loans through
our Banks and, Gateway Bank Mortgage, Inc. Our residential mortgage portfolio held by the Banks
includes first and junior lien mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit, and other term loans
secured by first and junior lien mortgages. Residential mortgage loans have historically been lower
risk loans in the Banks portfolios due to the ease in which the value of the collateral is
ascertained, although the risks involved with these loans has been on the rise lately due to
falling home prices and high unemployment in our markets. First mortgage loans are generally made
for the purchase of permanent residences, second homes, or residential investment property. Second
mortgages and home equity loans are generally for personal, family, and household purposes such as
home improvements, major purchases, education, and other personal needs. Mortgages which are
secured by a borrowers primary residence are made on the basis of the borrowers ability to repay
the loan from his or her regular income as well as the general creditworthiness of the borrower.
Mortgages secured by residential investment property are made based upon the same guidelines as
well as the borrowers ability to cover any cash flow shortages during the marketing of such
property for rent.
Installment loans to individuals. Installment loans to individuals are made on a regular basis
for personal, family, and general household purposes. More specifically, we make automobile loans,
home improvement loans, loans for vacations, and debt consolidation loans. Due to low interest
rates offered by auto dealership financial programs, this segment of the loan portfolio has
declined in recent years. While consumer financing may entail greater collateral risk than real
estate financing on a per loan basis, the relatively small principal balances of each loan
mitigates the risk associated with this segment of the portfolio.
Deposits
We offer a broad range of interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing deposit accounts,
including commercial and retail checking accounts, money market accounts, individual retirement
accounts, regular interest-bearing savings accounts, and certificates of deposit with a range of
maturity date options. The primary sources of deposits are small- and medium-sized businesses and
individuals within our target markets. Additionally, we entered the national certificate of deposit
market and the brokered certificate of deposit market during 2007.
S-65
The Company has opted to participate in the FDICs Transaction Account Guarantee Program
(TAGP), whereby the FDIC will provide deposit insurance coverage for the full amount in all of
the banks customers noninterest-bearing deposit accounts through December 31, 2010. There is a
possibility that the TAGP may be extended for an additional 12 months if the FDIC determines that
continuing economic conditions warrant such an extension. This includes personal and business
noninterest-bearing checking accounts, low-interest NOW accounts, official items, and certain types
of attorney trust accounts with interest rates of 0.25% or less. The TAGP insurance coverage is in
addition to the increased coverage provided by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.
Telephone and Internet Banking
We believe there is a strong demand within our markets for telephone banking and Internet
banking. These services allow both commercial and retail customers to access detailed account
information and execute a wide variety of banking transactions, including balance transfers and
bill payment. We believe these services are particularly attractive to our customers, as these
services enable them to conduct their banking business and monitor their accounts at any time.
Telephone and Internet banking assist us in attracting and retaining customers and encourage our
existing customers to consider us for all of their banking and financial needs.
Automatic Teller Machines
We have a network of seventy-two ATMs throughout our markets, which are accessible by the
customers of our subsidiary banks.
Other Products and Services
We offer other banking-related specialized products and services to our customers, such as
travelers checks, coin counters, wire services, and safe deposit box services. Additionally, we
offer our commercial customers various cash management products including remote deposit capture
which allows them to make electronic check deposits from their offices. We issue letters of credit
and standby letters of credit, most of which are related to real estate construction loans, for
some of our commercial customers. We have not engaged in any securitizations of loans.
The Company also offers other services that complement the core financial services offered by
the Banks. Three of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Hampton Roads Investments Inc., Shore
Investments Inc., and Gateway Investment Services, Inc., provide securities, brokerage, and
investment advisory services and are capable of handling many aspects of wealth management
including stocks, bonds, annuities, mutual funds, and financial consultation. Through Bank of
Hampton Roads subsidiary, Gateway Title Agency, Inc., we offer title insurance to our real estate
loan customers. Insurance products are also offered to businesses and individuals through, Gateway
Insurance Services, Inc. Additionally, Gateway Bank Mortgage, Inc. engages in originating and
processing mortgage loans.
Market
The Companys market area includes Hampton Roads, including Chesapeake, Norfolk, Virginia
Beach, Portsmouth, and Suffolk, Virginia; the Northeastern, Southeastern, and Research Triangle
regions of North Carolina; the Eastern Shore of Virginia and Maryland; and Richmond, Virginia. This
region has a diverse, well-rounded economy supported by a solid manufacturing base and a
significant military presence. The Company has no significant concentrations to any one customer.
S-66
Government Supervision and Regulation
General
As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956, as amended, and the examination and reporting requirements of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System.
Other federal and state laws govern the activities of our Banks, including the activities in
which they may engage, the investments they make, the aggregate amount of loans they may grant to
one borrower, and the dividends they may declare and pay to us. Our bank subsidiaries are also
subject to various consumer and compliance laws. As Virginia state-chartered banks, Bank of
Hampton Roads and Shore Bank are subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the
Virginia Bureau. In addition, we are regulated and supervised by the Federal Reserve. We must
furnish to the Federal Reserve quarterly and annual reports containing detailed financial
statements and schedules. All aspects of our operations, including reserves, loans, mortgages,
capital, issuance of securities, payment of dividends, and establishment of branches are governed
by these authorities. These authorities are able to impose penalties, initiate civil and
administrative actions, and take further steps to prevent us from engaging in unsafe or unsound
practices. In this regard, the Federal Reserve has adopted capital adequacy requirements.
The following description summarizes the more significant federal and state laws applicable to
us. To the extent that statutory or regulatory provisions are described, the description is
qualified in its entirety by reference to that particular statutory or regulatory provision.
Written Agreement
Under the terms of the Written Agreement, Bank of Hampton Roads has submitted for approval,
plans to (a) strengthen board oversight of management and Bank of Hampton Roads operations, (b)
strengthen credit risk management policies, (c) improve Bank Of Hampton Roads position with
respect to loans, relationships, or other assets in excess of $2.5 million which are now, or may in
the future become, past due more than 90 days, are on Bank of Hampton Roads problem loan list, or
adversely classified in any report of examination of Bank of Hampton Roads, (d) review and revise,
as appropriate, current policy and maintain sound processes for determining, documenting, and
recording an adequate allowance for loan and lease losses, (e) improve management of Bank of
Hampton Roads liquidity position and funds management policies, (f) provide contingency planning
that accounts for adverse scenarios and identifies and quantifies available sources of liquidity
for each scenario, (g) reduce the Banks reliance on brokered deposits, and (h) improve Bank of
Hampton Roads earnings and overall condition.
In addition, Bank of Hampton Roads has agreed that it will (a) not extend, renew, or
restructure any credit that has been criticized by the Reserve Bank or the Virginia Bureau absent
prior board of directors approval in accordance with the restrictions in the Written Agreement, (b)
eliminate all assets or portions of assets classified as loss and thereafter charge off all
assets classified as loss in a federal or state report of examination, unless otherwise approved
by the Reserve Bank, (c) comply with legal and regulatory limitations on indemnification payments
and severance payments, and (d) appoint a committee to monitor compliance with the terms of the
Written Agreement.
S-67
In addition, the Company has agreed that it will (a) not take any other form of payment
representing a reduction in Bank of Hampton Roads capital or make any distributions of interest,
principal, or other sums on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities absent prior
regulatory
approval, (b) take all necessary steps to correct certain technical violations of law and
regulation cited by the Reserve Bank, (c) refrain from guaranteeing any debt without the prior
written approval of the Reserve Bank and the Virginia Bureau, and (d) refrain from purchasing or
redeeming any shares of its stock without the prior written consent of the Reserve Bank or the
Virginia Bureau Institutions.
Under the terms of the Written Agreement, both the Company and Bank of Hampton Roads have
submitted for approval capital plans to maintain sufficient capital at the Company, on a
consolidated basis, and to refrain from declaring or paying dividends absent prior regulatory
approval.
The Bank Holding Company Act
Under the Bank Holding Company Act, we are subject to periodic examination by the Federal
Reserve and required to file periodic reports regarding our operations and any additional
information that the Federal Reserve may require. Our activities at the bank holding company level
are limited to:
|
|
|
banking, managing, or controlling banks; |
|
|
|
|
furnishing services to or performing services for our subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
|
engaging in other activities that the Federal Reserve has determined by regulation or order to be so closely related to
banking as to be a proper incident to these activities. |
Some of the activities that the Federal Reserve has determined by regulation to be closely
related to the business of a bank holding company include making or servicing loans and specific
types of leases, performing specific data processing services, and acting in some circumstances as
a fiduciary, investment, or financial adviser.
With some limited exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company
to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before:
|
|
|
acquiring substantially all the assets of any bank; and |
|
|
|
|
acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if after such acquisition it
would own or control more than 5% of the voting shares of such bank (unless it already owns or controls the majority of such shares)
or merging or consolidating with another bank holding company. |
In addition, and subject to some exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in
Bank Control Act, together with their regulations, require Federal Reserve approval prior to any
person or company acquiring control of a bank holding company. Control is conclusively presumed
to exist if an individual or company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the
bank holding company. Control is presumed to exist if a person acquires 10% or more, but less than
25%, of any class of voting securities and if the institution has registered securities under
Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or no other person owns a greater percentage of
that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction. The regulations provide a
procedure for challenging this rebuttable control presumption.
Payment of Dividends
The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Banks and our subsidiaries.
Substantially all of our cash revenues will result from dividends paid to us by our Banks and
interest earned on short-term investments.
S-68
Our Banks are subject to laws and regulations that limit the amount of dividends that they can pay.
Under Virginia law, a bank may not declare a dividend in excess of its accumulated retained
earnings. Additionally, our Banks may not declare a dividend, unless the dividend is approved by
the Federal Reserve, if the total amount of all dividends, including the proposed dividend,
declared by the bank in any calendar year exceeds the total of the banks retained net income of
that year to date, combined with its retained net income of the two preceding years. Our Banks may
not declare or pay any dividend if, after making the dividend, the bank would be
undercapitalized, as defined in the banking regulations. Both the Company and Bank of Hampton
Roads are prevented from paying dividends until their financial condition improves.
The Federal Reserve and the Bureau of Financial Institutions have the general authority to
limit the dividends paid by insured banks if the payment is deemed an unsafe and unsound practice.
Both the Federal Reserve and the Bureau of Financial Institutions have indicated that paying
dividends that deplete a banks capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsound and unsafe
banking practice. In addition, we are subject to certain regulatory requirements to maintain capital at or above
regulatory minimums. These regulatory requirements regarding capital affect our dividend policies.
Regulators have indicated that bank holding companies should generally pay dividends only if the
organizations net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient
to fully fund the dividends, and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with
the organizations capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition.
The Company is also required to obtain the consent of the Treasury to increase dividends on
its Common Stock until the earlier of December 31, 2011 or such time as the Treasury ceases to own
any debt or equity securities of the Company. As of September 30, 2010, the Company was not allowed
to pay any dividends without prior regulatory approval.
Insurance of Accounts, Assessments, and Regulation by the FDIC
The deposits of our bank subsidiaries are insured by the FDIC up to the limits set forth under
applicable law and are subject to the deposit insurance assessments of the Bank Insurance Fund
(BIF) of the FDIC. The FDIC has implemented a risk-based deposit insurance assessment system
under which the assessment rate for an insured institution may vary according to regulatory capital
levels of the institution and other factors, including supervisory evaluations. In addition to
being influenced by the risk profile of the particular depository institution, FDIC premiums are
also influenced by the size of the FDIC insurance fund in relation to total deposits in FDIC
insured banks. The FDIC has authority to impose special assessments.
In February 2006, The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 and The Federal Deposit
Insurance Reform Conforming Amendments Act of 2005 (collectively, The Reform Act) was signed into
law. This legislation contained technical and conforming changes to implement deposit insurance
reform, as well as a number of study and survey requirements.
The Reform Act provides for the following changes:
|
|
|
Merging the BIF and the Savings Association Insurance Fund into a new fund, the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). |
|
|
|
|
Increasing the coverage limit for retirement accounts to $250,000 and indexing the coverage limit for retirement
accounts to inflation as with the general deposit insurance coverage limit. |
|
|
|
|
Establishing a range of 1.15% to 1.50% within which the FDIC Board of Directors may set the Designated Reserve Ratio (DRR). |
S-69
|
|
|
Allowing the FDIC to manage the pace at which the DRR varies within this range. |
|
|
|
If the reserve ratio falls below 1.15%or is expected to within 6 monthsthe FDIC must adopt a restoration plan that provides
that the DIF will return to 1.15% generally within 5 years. |
|
|
|
|
If the reserve ratio exceeds 1.35%, the FDIC must generally dividend to DIF members half of the amount above the amount necessary
to maintain the DIF at 1.35%, unless the FDIC Board, considering statutory factors, suspends the dividends. |
|
|
|
|
If the reserve ratio exceeds 1.50%, the FDIC must generally dividend to
DIF members all amounts above the amount necessary to maintain the DIF at 1.50%. |
|
|
|
Eliminating the restrictions on premium rates based on the DRR and granting the FDIC Board the discretion to price deposit
insurance according to risk for all insured institutions regardless of the level of the reserve ratio. |
|
|
|
|
Granting a one-time initial assessment credit (of approximately $4.7 billion) to recognize institutions past contributions to the fund. |
|
|
|
|
Requiring the FDIC to conduct studies of three issues: (1) further potential changes to the deposit insurance system, (2)
the appropriate deposit base in designating the reserve ratio, and (3) the Corporations contingent loss reserving methodology and accounting for losses. |
|
|
|
|
Requiring the Comptroller General to conduct studies of (1) federal bank regulators administration of the prompt corrective action
program and recent changes to the FDIC deposit insurance system and (2) the organizational structure of the FDIC. |
The FDIC is authorized to prohibit any insured institution from engaging in any activity that
the FDIC determines by regulation or order to pose a serious threat to the DIF. Also, the FDIC may
initiate enforcement actions against banks, after first giving the institutions primary regulatory
authority an opportunity to take such action. The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any
depository institution if it determines, after a hearing, that the institution has engaged or is
engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue
operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, order or any condition imposed in
writing by the FDIC. It also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process
for the permanent termination of insurance, if the institution has no tangible capital. If deposit
insurance is terminated, the deposits at the institution at the time of termination, less
subsequent withdrawals, shall continue to be insured for a period from six months to two years, as
determined by the FDIC. We are unaware of any existing circumstances that could result in the
termination of any of our bank subsidiaries deposit insurance.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 comprehensively revised the laws affecting corporate
governance, accounting obligations, and corporate reporting for companies with equity or debt
securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In particular, the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act established: (1) new requirements for audit committees, including independence,
expertise, and responsibilities; (2) new certification responsibilities for the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer with respect to the Companys financial statements; (3) new
standards for auditors and regulation
of audits; (4) increased disclosure and reporting obligations for reporting companies and
their directors and executive officers; and (5) new and increased civil and criminal penalties for
violation of the federal securities laws.
S-70
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
In response to recent unprecedented market turmoil, the EESA was enacted on October 3, 2008.
EESA authorizes the Secretary of Treasury (the Secretary) to purchase or guarantee up to $700
billion in troubled assets from financial institutions under the TARP. Pursuant to authority
granted under EESA, the Secretary has created the TARP Capital Purchase Program (TARP CPP or
CPP) under which the Treasury could invest up to $250 billion in senior preferred stock of U.S.
banks and savings associations or their holding companies. Qualifying financial institutions issued
senior preferred stock with a value equal to not less than 1% of risk-weighted assets and not more
than the lesser of $25 billion or 3% of risk-weighted assets. The senior preferred stock pays
dividends at the rate of 5% per annum until the fifth anniversary of the investment and,
thereafter, at the rate of 9% per annum. The CPP was amended by the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) to allow the senior preferred stock to be redeemed within three
years without a qualifying equity offering, subject to the approval of its primary federal
regulator. After the three years, the senior preferred may be redeemed at any time in whole or in
part by the financial institution. Until the third anniversary of the issuance of the senior
preferred, the consent of the Treasury is required for an increase in the dividends on the Common
Stock or for any stock repurchases unless the senior preferred has been redeemed in its entirety or
the Treasury has transferred the senior preferred to third parties. The senior preferred does not
have voting rights other than the right to vote as a class on the issuance of any preferred stock
ranking senior, any change in its terms, or any merger, exchange, or similar transaction that would
adversely affects its rights. The senior preferred also has the right to elect two directors if
dividends have not been paid for six periods. The senior preferred is freely transferable and
participating institutions will be required to file a shelf registration statement covering the
senior preferred. The issuing institution must grant the Treasury piggyback registration rights.
Prior to issuance, the financial institution and its senior executive officers must modify or
terminate all benefit plans and arrangements to comply with EESA. Senior executives must also wave
any claims against the Treasury. No dividends may be paid on Common Stock unless dividends have
been paid on the senior preferred stock.
Institutions participating in the TARP or CPP are required to issue 10-year warrants for
common or preferred stock or senior debt with an aggregate market price equal to 15% of the amount
of senior preferred. The Treasury will not exercise voting rights with respect to any shares of
Common Stock acquired through exercise of the warrants. The financial institution must file a shelf
registration statement covering the warrants and underlying Common Stock as soon as practicable
after issuance and grant piggyback registration rights.
If an institution participates in the CPP or if the Secretary acquires a meaningful equity or
debt position in the institution as a result of TARP participation, the institution is required to
meet certain standards for executive compensation and corporate governance, including a prohibition
against incentives to take unnecessary and excessive risks, recovery of bonuses paid to senior
executives based on materially inaccurate earnings or other statements and a prohibition against
agreements for the payment of golden parachutes. Institutions that sell more than $300 million in
assets under TARP auctions or participate in the CPP will not be entitled to a tax deduction for
compensation in excess of $500 thousand paid to its chief executive or chief financial official or
any of its other three most highly compensated officers. Additional standards with respect to
executive compensation and corporate governance for institutions that have participated or will
participate in the TARP (including the CPP) were enacted as part of the ARRA, described below.
S-71
On December 31, 2008, and subsequent to the Companys acquisition of Gateway, as part of the
CPP, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement and Securities Purchase Agreement (collectively,
the Purchase Agreement) with the Treasury, pursuant to which the Company sold (i) 80,347 shares
of the Series C preferred, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and (ii) a warrant
(the Warrant) to purchase 1,325,858 shares of the Companys Common Stock at an initial exercise
price of $9.09 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution and other adjustments, for an aggregate
purchase price of $80.3 million in cash.
On August 12, 2010, the Company and Treasury executed the Exchange Agreement, which provides
for (i) the exchange of the 80,347 shares of the Series C preferred for 80,347 shares of a
newly-created Series C-1 Preferred with a liquidation preference of $1,000, (ii) the conversion of
the Series C-1 Preferred at a discounted conversion value of $260 per share into 52,225,550 shares
of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.40 per share; and (iii) the amendment of the terms of
the Warrant to provide for the purchase of up to 1,325,858 shares of Common Stock at an exercise
price of $0.40 per share for a ten-year term following the issuance of the amended warrant. On
September 30, 2010, the TARP Exchange and TARP Conversion occurred and the amended Warrant was
issued.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
The ARRA was enacted on February 17, 2009. The ARRA includes a wide variety of programs
intended to stimulate the economy and provide for extensive infrastructure, energy, health, and
education needs. In addition, the ARRA imposes certain new executive compensation and corporate
governance obligations on all current and future TARP recipients for such period as any obligation
arising from financial assistance remains outstanding (disregarding any warrants to purchase Common
Stock of the Company that the Treasury may hold). TARP recipients are now permitted to redeem the
preferred stock without regard to the three-year holding period and without the need to raise new
capital through a qualified equity offering, subject to approval of its primary federal regulator.
The executive compensation restrictions under the ARRA (described below) are more stringent than
those initially enacted by EESA.
The ARRA amended Section 111 of the EESA to require the Secretary to adopt additional
standards with respect to executive compensation and corporate governance for TARP recipients. The
standards required to be established by the Secretary include, in part, (1) prohibitions on making
golden parachute payments to senior executive officers and the next 5 most highly-compensated
employees during such time as any obligation arising from financial assistance provided under the
TARP remains outstanding (the Restricted Period), (2) prohibitions on paying or accruing bonuses
or other incentive awards for certain senior executive officers and employees, except for awards of
long-term restricted stock with a value equal to no greater than 1/3 of the subject employees
annual compensation that do not fully vest during the Restricted Period or unless such compensation
is pursuant to a valid written employment contract prior to February 11, 2009, (3) requirements
that TARP CPP participants provide for the recovery of any bonus or incentive compensation paid to
senior executive officers and the next 20 most highly-compensated employees based on statements of
earnings, revenues, gains, or other criteria later found to be materially inaccurate, with the
Secretary having authority to negotiate for reimbursement, and (4) a review by the Secretary of all
bonuses and other compensation paid by TARP participants to senior executive employees and the next
20 most highly-compensated employees before the date of enactment of the ARRA to determine whether
such payments were inconsistent with the purposes of the Act.
The ARRA also sets forth additional corporate governance obligations for TARP recipients,
including requirements for the Secretary to establish standards that provide for semi-annual
meetings of compensation committees of the board of directors to discuss and evaluate employee
compensation plans in light of an assessment of any risk posed from such compensation plans.
S-72
TARP recipients are further
required by the ARRA to have in place company-wide policies regarding excessive or luxury
expenditures, permit non-binding shareholder say-on-pay proposals to be included in proxy
materials, as well as require written certifications by the chief executive officer and chief
financial officer with respect to compliance.
On June 15, 2009, the Treasury published its standards for executive compensation and
corporate governance pursuant to ARRA.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Our customers deposit accounts are insured by the FDIC and, therefore, we are subject to
insurance assessments imposed by the FDIC. On November 2, 2006, the FDIC adopted final regulations
establishing a risk-based assessment system that was intended to more closely tie each banks
deposit insurance assessments to the risk it poses to the FDICs deposit insurance fund. Under the
risk-based assessment system, which became effective in the beginning of 2007, the FDIC evaluates
each banks risk based on three primary factors: (1) its supervisory rating, (2) its financial
ratios, and (3) its long-term debt issuer rating, if applicable. The new rates may vary between 5
and 43 cents for every $100 of domestic deposits, depending on the insured institutions risk
category.
On October 16, 2008, the FDIC published a restoration plan designed to replenish the DIF over
a period of five years and to increase the deposit insurance reserve ratio, which decreased to
1.01% of insured deposits on June 30, 2008, to the statutory minimum of 1.15% of insured deposits
by December 31, 2013. On February 27, 2009, the FDIC published a final rule modifying the
risk-based assessment system and extended the period of restoration plan to seven years. In order
to implement the restoration plan, the FDIC adjusted both its risk-based assessment system and its
base assessment rates. For the first quarter of 2009 only, the FDIC increased all FDIC deposit
assessment rates by 7 basis points. These new rates range from 12-14 basis points for Risk Category
I institutions to 50 basis points for Risk Category IV institutions. Under the FDICs restoration
plan, the FDIC established a new initial base assessment rate that will be subject to adjustment as
described below. Beginning April 1, 2009, the initial base assessment rates range from 12-16 basis
points for Risk Category I institutions to 4 basis points for Risk Category IV institutions.
Changes to the risk-based assessment system include increasing premiums for institutions that rely
on excessive amounts of brokered deposits to fund rapid growth, excluding Certificate of Deposit
Account Registry Service (CDARS), increasing premiums for excessive use of secured liabilities,
including Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances, lowering premiums for smaller institutions with
very high capital levels, and additional financial ratios and debt issuer ratings to the premium
calculations for banks with over $10 billion in assets, while providing a reduction for their
unsecured debt. After applying all possible adjustments, minimum and maximum total base assessment
rates range from 7-24 basis points for Risk Category I institutions to 40-77.5 basis points for
Risk Category IV institutions. Either an increase in the Risk Category of the Bank or adjustments
to the base assessment rates could have material adverse effect on our earnings.
In addition, all institutions with deposits insured by the FDIC are required to pay
assessments to fund interest payments on bonds issued by the Financing Corporation, a
mixed-ownership government corporation established to recapitalize a predecessor to the DIF. Our
current annualized assessment rate is 1.14 basis points, or approximately 0.285 basis points per
quarter. These assessments will continue until the Financing Corporation bonds mature in 2019.
The FDIC insures our customer deposits through the DIF up to prescribed limits for each
depositor. The amount of FDIC assessments paid by each DIF member institution is based on its
relative risk of default as measured by regulatory capital ratios and other supervisory factors.
The FDIC is authorized to set the reserve ratio for the DIF annually between 1.15% and 1.50% of
estimated insured
deposits.
S-73
The FDIC may increase or decrease the assessment rate schedule on a semi-annual basis. In an effort
to restore capitalization levels and to ensure the DIF will adequately cover projected losses from
future bank failures, the FDIC, in October 2008, proposed a rule to alter the way in which it
differentiates for risk in the risk based assessment system and to revise deposit insurance
assessment rates, including base assessment rates.
On February 27, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule modifying the risk based assessment system
that set initial base assessment rates beginning April 1, 2009 at 12 to 45 basis points and, due to
extraordinary circumstances, extended the time within which the reserve ratio must by returned to
1.15% from five to seven years.
On May 22, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a 5 basis point special assessment on
each insured depository institutions assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. The amount
of the special assessment for any institution was limited to 10 basis points times the
institutions assessment base for the second quarter 2009. The special assessment was collected on
September 30, 2009. Additionally, by participating in the transaction account guarantee program under the TLGP, banks
temporarily become subject to an additional assessment on deposits in excess of $250,000 in certain
transaction accounts and additionally for assessments from 50 basis points to 100 basis points per
annum depending on the initial maturity of the debt. Further, all FDIC insured institutions are
required to pay assessments to the FDIC to fund interest payments on bonds issued by the Financing
Corporation (FICO), an agency of the Federal Government established to recapitalize the
predecessor to the DIF. The FICO assessment rates, which are determined quarterly, averaged 0.0113%
of insured deposits in fiscal 2008. These assessments will continue until the FICO bonds mature in
2017. The FDIC may terminate a depository institutions deposit insurance upon a finding that the
institutions financial condition is unsafe or unsound or that the institution has engaged in
unsafe or unsound practices that pose a risk to the DIF or that may prejudice the interest of the
banks depositors. The termination of deposit insurance for a bank would also result in the
revocation of the banks charter.
FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP)
On October 14, 2008, the FDIC announced the TLGP. The final rule was adopted on November 21,
2008. The FDIC stated that its purpose is to strengthen confidence and encourage liquidity in the
banking system by guaranteeing newly issued senior unsecured debt of banks of 31 days or greater,
thrifts, and certain holding companies, and by providing full coverage of all noninterest-bearing
transaction deposit accounts, regardless of dollar amount. Inclusion in the program was voluntary.
Participating institutions are assessed fees based on a sliding scale depending on length of
maturity. Shorter-term debt has a lower fee structure and longer-term debt has a higher fee. The
range is from 50 basis points on debt of 180 days or less and a maximum of 100 basis points for
debt with maturities of one year or longer, on an annualized basis. Through the TAGP, the FDIC also
provides for the insurance of all funds held by qualified institutions in noninterest-bearing
transaction deposit accounts until December 31, 2010. As previously mentioned, there is a
possibility that the TAGP may be extended for an additional 12 months. A 10-basis point surcharge
over the institutions current assessment rate will be applied to those deposits not otherwise
covered by the existing deposit insurance limit of $250,000. In addition, a special assessment fee
will be collected to cover any losses not covered by the fees to ensure no impact on the FDICs
DIF. The Company elected to participate in the TLGP.
Federal Deposits Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA)
FDICIA requires insured institutions with $1 billion or more in total assets at the beginning
of their fiscal year to submit independently audited annual reports to the FDIC and the appropriate
agency.
S-74
These publicly available reports must include: (1) annual financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and such other
disclosure requirements as required by the FDIC or the appropriate agency and (2) a management
report signed by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer or Chief Accounting
Officer of the institution that contains a statement of managements responsibilities for: (i)
preparing the annual financial statements; (ii) establishing and maintaining an adequate internal
control structure and procedures for financial reporting; and (iii) complying with the laws and
regulations designed by the FDIC relating to safety and soundness and an assessment of: (aa) the
effectiveness of the system of internal control and procedures for financial reporting as of the
end of the fiscal year and (bb) the institutions compliance during the fiscal year with applicable
laws and regulations designed by the FDIC relating to safety and soundness.
With respect to any internal control report, the institutions independent public accountants must
attest to, and report separately on, certain assertions of the institutions management contained
in such report. Any attestation by the independent accountant is to be made in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States for attestation engagements.
Capital Requirements
Each of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Bank has issued risk-based and leverage capital
guidelines applicable to banking organizations that it supervises. The federal capital standards
define capital and establish minimum capital requirements in relation to assets and off-balance
sheet exposure as adjusted for credit risk. The risk-based capital standards currently in effect
are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profile
among bank holding companies and banks, to account for off-balance sheet exposure, and to minimize
disincentives for holding liquid assets. Assets and off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad
risk categories, each with appropriate risk weights. The resulting capital ratios represent capital
as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items.
Under the risk-based capital requirements, we and our bank subsidiaries are each generally
required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (including specific
off-balance sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit) of 8%. At least half of the total
capital must be composed of Tier 1 Capital, which is defined as common equity, retained earnings,
qualifying perpetual preferred stock, and minority interests in common equity accounts of
consolidated subsidiaries, less certain intangibles. The remainder may consist of Tier 2 Capital,
which is defined as specific subordinated debt, some hybrid capital instruments and other
qualifying preferred stock, and a limited amount of the loan loss allowance and pretax net
unrealized holding gains on certain equity securities. In addition, each of the federal banking
regulatory agencies has established minimum leverage capital requirements for banking
organizations. Under these requirements, banking organizations must maintain a minimum ratio of
Tier 1 capital to adjusted average quarterly assets equal to 3% to 5%, subject to federal bank
regulatory evaluation of an organizations overall safety and soundness. In summary, the capital
measures used by the federal banking regulators are Total Risk-Based Capital ratio (the total of
Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets), Tier 1 Risk-Based
Capital ratio (Tier 1 capital divided by total risk-weighted assets), and the Leverage ratio (Tier
1 capital divided by adjusted average total assets). Under these regulations, a bank will be:
|
|
|
well capitalized if it has a Total Risk-Based Capital ratio of 10% or greater, a Tier 1
Risk-Based Capital ratio of 6% or greater, a Leverage ratio of 5% or greater, and is not subject to any written agreement, order,
capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive by a federal bank regulatory agency to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure, |
|
|
|
|
adequately capitalized if it has a Total Risk-Based Capital ratio of 8% or greater, a Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital ratio of 4% or
greater, and a Leverage ratio of 4% or greater (or 3% in certain circumstances) and is not well capitalized, |
S-75
|
|
|
undercapitalized if it has a Total Risk-Based Capital ratio of less than 8%, a Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital ratio of less than 4%
(or 3% in certain circumstances), or a Leverage ratio of less than 4% (or 3% in certain circumstances), |
|
|
|
|
significantly undercapitalized if it has a Total Risk-Based Capital ratio of less than 6%, a Tier 1 Risk-Based
Capital ratio of less than 3%, or a Leverage ratio of less than 3%, or |
|
|
|
|
critically undercapitalized if its tangible equity is equal to or less than 2% of tangible assets. |
As of September 30, 2010, after the First Closing, the Company, Bank of Hampton Roads and
Shore Bank were all well-capitalized under the regulatory guidance.
The risk-based capital standards of each of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Bank explicitly
identify concentrations of credit risk and the risk arising from non-traditional activities, as
well as an institutions ability to manage these risks, as important factors to be taken into
account by the agency in assessing an institutions overall capital adequacy. The capital
guidelines also provide that an institutions exposure to a decline in the economic value of its
capital due to changes in interest rates be considered by the agency as a factor in evaluating a
banking organizations capital adequacy.
Imposition of Liability for Undercapitalized Subsidiaries
Bank regulators are required to take prompt corrective action to resolve problems associated
with insured depository institutions whose capital declines below certain levels. In the event an
institution becomes undercapitalized, it must submit a capital restoration plan. The capital
restoration plan will not be accepted by the regulators unless each company having control of the
undercapitalized institution guarantees the subsidiarys compliance with the capital restoration
plan up to a certain specified amount. Any such guarantee from a depository institutions holding
company is entitled to a priority of payment in bankruptcy. The aggregate liability of the holding
company of an undercapitalized bank is limited to the lesser of 5% of the institutions assets at
the time it became undercapitalized or the amount necessary to cause the institution to be
adequately capitalized. The bank regulators have greater power in situations where an institution
becomes significantly or critically undercapitalized or fails to submit a capital restoration
plan. For example, a bank holding company controlling such an institution can be required to obtain
prior Federal Reserve approval of proposed dividends or might be required to consent to a
consolidation or to divest the troubled institution or other affiliates.
The FDIC may take various corrective actions against any undercapitalized bank and any bank
that fails to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan or fails to implement a plan acceptable
to the FDIC. These powers include, but are not limited to, requiring the institution to be
recapitalized, prohibiting asset growth, restricting interest rates paid, requiring prior approval
of capital distributions by any bank holding company that controls the institution, requiring
divestiture by the institution of its subsidiaries or by the holding company of the institution
itself, requiring new election of directors, and requiring the dismissal of directors and officers.
Other Safety and Soundness Regulations
There are significant obligations and restrictions imposed on bank holding companies and their
depository institution subsidiaries by federal law and regulatory policy that are designed to
reduce potential loss exposure to the depositors of such depository institutions and to the FDIC
insurance fund in the event that the depository institution is insolvent or is in danger of
becoming insolvent. These obligations and restrictions are not for the benefit of investors.
S-76
Regulators may pursue an administrative action against any bank holding company or bank which
violates the law, engages in an unsafe or unsound banking practice, or is about to engage in an
unsafe or unsound banking practice. The administrative action could take the form of a cease and
desist proceeding, a removal action against the responsible individuals or, in the case of a
violation of law or unsafe and unsound banking practice, a civil monetary penalty action. A cease
and desist order, in addition to prohibiting certain action, could also require that certain
actions be undertaken. Under the policies of the Federal Reserve Bank, we are required to serve as
a source of financial strength to our subsidiary depository institutions and to commit resources to
support the banks in circumstances where we might not do so otherwise.
The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)
Under the BSA, a financial institution is required to have systems in place to detect certain
transactions, based on the size and nature of the transaction. Financial institutions are generally
required to report cash transactions involving more than $10,000 to the Treasury. In addition,
financial institutions are required to file suspicious activity reports for transactions that
involve more than $5,000 and which the financial institution knows, suspects, or has reason to
suspect involves illegal funds, is designed to evade the requirements of the BSA, or has no lawful
purpose.
USA Patriot Act of 2001
In October 2001, the USA Patriot Act of 2001 was enacted in response to the terrorist attacks
in New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C. that occurred on September 11, 2001. The Patriot
Act is intended to strengthen U.S. law enforcement and the intelligence communities abilities to
work cohesively to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The Patriot Act contains sweeping
anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and imposes various regulations, including
standards for verifying client identification at account opening and rules to promote cooperation
among financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that
my be involved in terrorism or money laundering. The continuing and potential impact of the Patriot
Act and related regulations and policies on financial institutions of all kinds is significant and
wide-ranging.
Monetary Policy
The commercial banking business is affected not only by general economic conditions but also
by the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Bank. The instruments of monetary policy employed
by the Federal Reserve include open market operations in United States government securities,
changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements against
deposits held by federally insured banks. The Federal Reserve Banks monetary policies have had a
significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to
continue to do so in the future. In view of changing conditions in the national and international
economies and in the money markets, as well as the effect of actions by monetary and fiscal
authorities, including the Federal Reserve System, no prediction can be made as to possible future
changes in interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand, or the business and earnings of our bank
subsidiaries, their subsidiaries, or any of our other subsidiaries.
Transactions with Affiliates
Transactions between banks and their affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the
Federal Reserve Act. An affiliate of a bank is any bank or entity that controls, is controlled by,
or is under common control with such bank. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B (i) limit the extent to
which the bank or its subsidiaries may engage in covered transactions with any one affiliate to
an amount equal to 10% of such institutions capital stock and surplus and maintain an aggregate
limit on all such transactions
with affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such capital stock and surplus and (ii) require
that all such transactions be on terms substantially the same as, or at least as favorable to those
that, the bank has provided to a non-affiliate.
S-77
The term covered transaction includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a
guarantee, and similar other types of transactions. Section 23B applies to covered transactions
as well as sales of assets and payments of money to an affiliate. These transactions must also be
conducted on terms substantially the same as, or at least favorable to those that, the bank has
provided to non-affiliates. We are aware of and previously disclosed to our regulators that $21.5 million of a loan from Bank
of Hampton Roads to the Company is inadequately secured in violation of Regulation W promulgated by
the Federal Reserve. The Company has been in discussions with banking regulators regarding the
potential for repayment of this loan through possible capital raising efforts. Additionally, as of
September 30, 2010, we are aware of and previously disclosed to our regulators that loans from
Shore Bank to its affiliates exceeded the 20% threshold. This Shore Bank loan was repaid on
October 7, 2010.
Loans to Insiders
The Federal Reserve Act and related regulations impose specific restrictions on loans to
directors, executive officers, and principal shareholders of banks. Under Section 22(h) of the
Federal Reserve Act, loans to a director, an executive officer, and to a principal shareholder of a
bank as well as to entities controlled by any of the foregoing may not exceed, together with all
other outstanding loans to such person and entities controlled by such person, the banks
loan-to-one borrower limit. Loans in the aggregate to insiders and their related interests as a
class may not exceed two times the banks unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus until the
banks total assets equal or exceed $100 million at which time the aggregate is limited to the
banks unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Section 22(h) also prohibits loans above amounts
prescribed by the appropriate federal banking agency to directors, executive officers, and
principal shareholders of a bank or bank holding company and to entities controlled by such
persons, unless such loan is approved in advance by a majority of the board of directors of the
bank with any interested director not participating in the voting. The FDIC has prescribed the
loan amount, which includes all other outstanding loans to such person as to which such prior board
of director approval is required, as being the greater of $25,000 or 5% of capital and surplus (up
to $500,000). Section 22(h) requires that loans to directors, executive officers, and principal
shareholders be made on terms and underwriting standards substantially the same as offered in
comparable transactions to other persons. As of September 30, 2010, there were no loans to insiders
and their related interests in the aggregate that exceeded the Companys or Banks unimpaired
capital and unimpaired surplus. However, Bank of Hampton Roads currently has four outstanding
loans that exceed its loan-to-one borrower limit by the following percentages: 6.0%, 7.9%, 9.5% and
21.5%.
Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (CRA)
Under the CRA and related regulations, depository institutions have an affirmative obligation
to assist in meeting the credit needs of their market areas, including low and moderate-income
areas, consistent with safe and sound banking practice. The CRA requires the adoption by each
institution of a CRA statement for each of its market areas describing the depository institutions
efforts to assist in its communitys credit needs. Depository institutions are periodically
examined for compliance with the CRA and are periodically assigned ratings in this regard. Banking
regulators consider a depository institutions CRA rating when reviewing applications to establish
new branches, undertake new lines of business, and/or acquire part or all of another depository
institution. An unsatisfactory rating can significantly delay or even prohibit regulatory approval
of a proposed transaction by a bank holding company or its depository institution subsidiaries.
S-78
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and federal bank regulators have made various changes to
the CRA. Among other changes, CRA agreements with private parties must be disclosed and annual
reports must be made to a banks primary federal regulator. A bank holding company or any of its
subsidiaries will not be permitted to engage in new activities authorized under the GLBA if any
bank subsidiary received less than a satisfactory rating in its latest CRA examination. During
our last CRA exam, our rating was satisfactory.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
The GLBA covers a broad range of issues, including a repeal of most of the restrictions on
affiliations among depository institutions, securities firms, and insurance companies. The
following description summarizes some of its significant provisions.
The GLBA provides that the states continue to have the authority to regulate insurance
activities but prohibits the states in most instances from preventing or significantly interfering
with the ability of a bank, directly or through an affiliate, to engage in insurance sales,
solicitations, or cross-marketing activities. Although the states generally must regulate bank
insurance activities in a nondiscriminatory manner, the states may continue to adopt and enforce
rules that specifically regulate bank insurance activities in areas identified under the law. Under
the law, the federal bank regulatory agencies adopted insurance consumer protection regulations
that apply to sales practices, solicitations, advertising, and disclosures.
The GLBA contains extensive customer privacy protection provisions. Under these provisions, a
financial institution must provide to its customers, both at the inception of the customer
relationship and on an annual basis, the institutions policies and procedures regarding the
handling of customers nonpublic personal financial information. The law provides that, except for
specific limited exceptions, an institution may not provide such personal information to
unaffiliated third parties unless the institution discloses to the customer that such information
may be so provided and the customer is given the opportunity to opt out of such disclosure. An
institution may not disclose to a non-affiliated third party, other than to a consumer credit
reporting agency, customer account numbers or other similar account identifiers for marketing
purposes. The GLBA also provides that the states may adopt customer privacy protections that are
stricter than those contained in the act.
The GLBA repeals sections 20 and 32 of the Glass-Steagall Act, thus permitting unrestricted
affiliations between banks and securities firms.
Consumer Laws Regarding Fair Lending
In addition to the CRA described above, other federal and state laws regulate various lending
and consumer aspects of our business. Governmental agencies, including the Department of Housing
and Urban Development, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Department of Justice, have become
concerned that prospective borrowers may experience discrimination in their efforts to obtain loans
from depository and other lending institutions. These agencies have brought litigation against
depository institutions alleging discrimination against borrowers. Many of these suits have been
settled, in some cases for material sums of money, short of a full trial.
These governmental agencies have clarified what they consider to be lending discrimination and
have specified various factors that they will use to determine the existence of lending
discrimination under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act, including evidence
that a lender discriminated on a prohibited basis, evidence that a lender treated applicants
differently based on prohibited factors in the absence of evidence that the treatment was the
result of prejudice or a conscious
intention to discriminate, and evidence that a lender applied an otherwise neutral
non-discriminatory policy uniformly to all applicants but the practice had a discriminatory effect
unless the practice could be justified as a business necessity.
S-79
Banks and other depository institutions also are subject to numerous consumer-oriented laws
and regulations. These laws, which include the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act, and the Fair Housing Act, require compliance by depository institutions with
various disclosure requirements and requirements regulating the availability of funds after deposit
or the making of some loans to customers.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law, which significantly changes the
regulation of financial institutions and the financial services industry. The Dodd-Frank Act,
together with the regulations to be developed thereunder, includes provisions affecting large and
small financial institutions alike, including several provisions that will affect how community
banks, thrifts, and small bank and thrift holding companies will be regulated in the future.
The Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, imposes new capital requirements on bank holding
companies; changes the base for FDIC insurance assessments to a banks average consolidated total
assets minus average tangible equity, rather than upon its deposit base, and permanently raises the
current standard deposit insurance limit to $250,000; and expands the FDICs authority to raise
insurance premiums. The new legislation also calls for the FDIC to raise the ratio of reserves to
deposits from 1.15% to 1.35% for deposit insurance purposes by September 30, 2020 and to offset
the effect of increased assessments on insured depository institutions with assets of less than
$10 billion. The Dodd-Frank Act also limits interchange fees payable on debit card transactions,
establishes the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection as an independent entity within the Federal
Reserve, which will have broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement authority over consumer
financial products and services, including deposit products, residential mortgages, home-equity
loans and credit cards, and contains provisions on mortgage-related matters such as steering
incentives, determinations as to a borrowers ability to repay and prepayment penalties. The
Dodd-Frank Act also includes provisions that affect corporate governance and executive compensation
at all publicly-traded companies and allows financial institutions to pay interest on business
checking accounts. The new law also restricts proprietary trading, places restrictions on the
owning or sponsoring of hedge and private equity funds, and regulates the derivatives activities of
banks and their affiliates.
Future Regulatory Uncertainty
Because federal and state regulation of financial institutions changes regularly and is the
subject of constant legislative debate, we cannot forecast how federal and state regulation of
financial institutions may change in the future and, as a result, impact our operations. Although
Congress and the state legislature in recent years have sought to reduce the regulatory burden on
financial institutions with respect to the approval of specific transactions, we fully expect that
the financial institution industry will remain heavily regulated in the near future and that
additional laws or regulations may be adopted further regulating specific banking practices.
Employees
As of September 30, 2010, we employed 730 people, of whom 697 were full-time employees.
S-80
Competition
The financial services industry remains highly competitive and is constantly evolving. We
experience strong competition with competitors, some of which are not subject to the same degree of
regulation that is imposed on us. Many of them have broader geographic markets and substantially
greater resources, and therefore, can offer more diversified products and services.
In our market areas, we compete with large national and regional financial institutions,
savings banks, and other independent community banks, as well as credit unions, consumer finance
companies, mortgage companies, loan production offices, and insurance companies. Many of these
institutions have substantially greater assets and capital than we do. In many instances, these
institutions have greater lending limits than we do. Competition for deposits and loans is affected
by factors such as interest rates offered, the number and location of branches, types of products
offered, and reputation of the institution. We believe that our pricing of products has remained
competitive, but our historical success is primarily attributable to high quality service and
community involvement.
Properties
We lease our executive offices, which are located at 999 Waterside Drive, Suite 200,
Norfolk, VA 23510. The original lease was dated May 26, 2005 and includes a portion of the first
floor and all of the second floor. There has been one amendment to the lease, which adds a portion
of the nineteenth floor. This lease expires September 30, 2016. We operate from the locations
listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Accomac, VA
|
|
22349 Counsel Drive (8)
|
|
Lease |
Cape Charles, VA
|
|
22468 Lankford Highway (3)
|
|
Own |
Cary, NC
|
|
4725 SW Cary Parkway (10)
|
|
Own |
Chapel Hill, NC
|
|
504 Meadowmont Village Center (10)
|
|
Lease |
Chapel Hill, NC
|
|
421 Meadowmont Village Center (9)
|
|
Lease |
Charlottesville, VA
|
|
204 Albemarle Square (3)
|
|
Lease |
Charlottesville, VA
|
|
690 Berkmar Circle (9)
|
|
Lease |
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
201 Volvo Parkway (3)
|
|
Own |
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
852 N George Washington Highway (3)
|
|
Own |
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
712 Liberty Street (3)
|
|
Own |
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
4108 Portsmouth Boulevard (3)
|
|
Own |
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
4720 Battlefield Boulevard (3)
|
|
Own |
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
239 Battlefield Boulevard S (3)
|
|
Own |
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
111 Gainsborough Square (4)
|
|
Own |
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
1500 Mount Pleasant Road (3)
|
|
Lease Land/Own Building |
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
1400 Kempsville Road (3)
|
|
Lease |
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
1403 Greenbrier Parkway (3)
|
|
Lease |
Chesapeake, VA
|
|
204 Carmichael Way (3)
|
|
Own |
Chincoteauge, VA
|
|
6350 Maddox Boulevard (3)
|
|
Own |
S-81
|
|
|
|
|
Edenton, NC
|
|
322 S Broad Street (13)
|
|
Own |
Elizabeth City, NC
|
|
112 Corporate Drive (6)
|
|
Own |
Elizabeth City, NC
|
|
1145 North Road Street (14)
|
|
Lease Land/Own Building |
Elizabeth City, NC
|
|
1404 West Ehringhaus Street (3)
|
|
Own |
Elizabeth City, NC
|
|
400 West Ehringhaus Street (4)
|
|
Own |
Elizabeth City, NC
|
|
961-A Oak Stump Road (2)
|
|
Lease |
Emporia, VA
|
|
520 South Main Street (3)
|
|
Own |
Emporia, VA
|
|
100 Dominion Drive (3)
|
|
Own |
Exmore, VA
|
|
4071 Lankford Highway (3)
|
|
Own |
Greenville, NC
|
|
204 East Arlington Boulevard (9)
|
|
Lease |
Hertford, NC
|
|
147 North Church Street (2)
|
|
Own |
Kitty Hawk, NC
|
|
3600 Croatan Highway (4)
|
|
Own |
Kitty Hawk, NC
|
|
5406 North Croatan Highway (14)
|
|
Lease Land/Own Building |
Midlothian, VA
|
|
13804 Hull Street (3)
|
|
Own |
Moyock, NC
|
|
100 Moyock Commons Drive (4)
|
|
Own |
Nags Head, NC
|
|
2808 South Croatan Highway (5)
|
|
Lease |
Newport News, VA
|
|
749A Thimble Shoals Boulevard (11)
|
|
Lease |
Newport News, VA
|
|
753 Thimble Shoals Boulevard (2)
|
|
Lease |
Norfolk, VA
|
|
4500 East Princess Anne Road (3)
|
|
Own |
Norfolk, VA
|
|
539 West 21st Street (10)
|
|
Lease |
Norfolk, VA
|
|
500 Plume Street East (3)
|
|
Lease |
Norfolk, VA
|
|
4037 East Little Creek Road (3)
|
|
Lease |
Norfolk, VA
|
|
999 Waterside Drive, Suite 101(3)
|
|
Lease |
Norfolk, VA
|
|
999 Waterside Drive 2nd Floor (6)
|
|
Lease |
Norfolk, VA
|
|
999 Waterside Drive, Suite 1925 (6)
|
|
Lease |
Onley, VA
|
|
25253 Lankford Highway (10)
|
|
Lease Land/Own Building |
Onley, VA
|
|
25020 Shore Parkway (6)
|
|
Own |
Parksley, VA
|
|
18426 Dunne Avenue (3)
|
|
Own |
Plymouth, NC
|
|
433 US Highway 64 East (4)
|
|
Own |
Pocomoke City, MD
|
|
103 Pocomoke Marketplace (3)
|
|
Lease |
Raleigh, NC
|
|
8470 Falls of Neuse Road (10)
|
|
Own |
Raleigh, NC
|
|
2235 Gateway Access Point (10)
|
|
Own |
Richmond, VA
|
|
5300 Patterson Avenue (10)
|
|
Own |
Richmond, VA
|
|
2730 Buford Road (3)
|
|
Own |
Richmond, VA
|
|
8209 West Broad Street (3)
|
|
Own |
Richmond, VA
|
|
12090 West Broad Street (3)
|
|
Own |
Roper, NC
|
|
102 West Buncombe Street (3)
|
|
Own |
Salisbury, MD
|
|
1503 South Salisbury Boulevard (3)
|
|
Own |
Salisbury, MD
|
|
100 West Main Street (3)
|
|
Own |
Suffolk, VA
|
|
117 Market Street (3)
|
|
Own |
Suffolk, VA
|
|
2825 Godwin Drive (10)
|
|
Own |
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
5472 Indian River Road (3)
|
|
Own |
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
1100 Dam Neck Road (3)
|
|
Own |
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
713 Independence Boulevard (3)
|
|
Lease |
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
1580 Laskin Road (12)
|
|
Lease Land/Own Building |
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
641 Lynnhaven Parkway (7)
|
|
Own |
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
3801 Pacific Avenue (3)
|
|
Lease |
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
2098 Princess Anne Road (10)
|
|
Lease Land/Own Building |
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
3001 Shore Drive (3)
|
|
Lease |
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
1316 North Great Neck Road (3)
|
|
Lease |
Virginia Beach, VA
|
|
281 Independence Bouelvard (3)
|
|
Lease |
S-82
|
|
|
|
|
Wake Forest, NC
|
|
152 Capcom Avenue (3)
|
|
Lease |
Wilmington, NC
|
|
901 Military Cutoff Road (10)
|
|
Own |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes banking, investment brokerage, and insurance services |
|
(2) |
|
Insurance services only |
|
(3) |
|
Banking services only |
|
(4) |
|
Banking and insurance services |
|
(5) |
|
Banking and investment brokerage services |
|
(6) |
|
Operations center |
|
(7) |
|
Banking and title insurance services |
|
(8) |
|
Investment brokerage services only |
|
(9) |
|
Loan production office |
|
(10) |
|
Banking and mortgage services |
|
(11) |
|
Title services |
|
(12) |
|
Banking, investment, and mortgage services |
|
(13) |
|
Banking, insurance, and mortgage services |
|
(14) |
|
Banking, investment, insurance, and mortgage services |
All of our properties are in good operating condition and are adequate for our present and
anticipated future needs.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary course of operations, the Company may become a party to legal proceedings.
Based upon information currently available, management believes that such legal proceedings, in the
aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, or
results of operations.
On November 2, 2010, the Company received from the United States Department of Justice,
Criminal Division a grand jury subpoena. For a discussion of this matter, see Risk Factors
Risks Relating to our Business The Company has received a grand jury subpoena from the United
States Department of Justice, Criminal Division and, although the Company is not a target at this
time and we do not believe the Company will become a target, there can be no assurances as to the
timing or eventual outcome of the related investigation.
S-83
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
DIRECTORS
The following sets forth the names, ages and business experience for the past five years of
each of the Companys directors, the date each became a director and their respective term of
office.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Term |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Since |
|
Expires in |
John A. B. Andy
Davies, Jr.
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Mr. Davies was
named President and
CEO of the Company
in July 2009.
Prior to joining
the Company, Davies
was President and
CEO of The Marathon
Organization Ltd.,
a management
consulting firm
focused on
community banks.
Davies served as
Chairman of the
Virginia Board of
Directors of RBC
Centura Bank from
2001 to 2004 and as
Regional President
Virginia Market
of Centura Bank
from 1999 to 2001.
From 1991 to 1999,
he was President,
CEO, and Director
of First Coastal
Bankshares. His
banking career
began in 1974. He
is a graduate of
the College of
William and Mary
and the Stonier
Graduate School of
Banking. Mr.
Davies has been
actively engaged
with numerous
civic, cultural,
and educational
organizations in
Hampton Roads,
including the role
of board chairman
with ACCESS College
Foundation, WHRO
Foundation, United
Way of South
Hampton Roads, and
Junior Achievement
of Greater Hampton
Roads. Mr. Davies
experience in the
banking industry
and his extensive
knowledge of
financial services
provide the Board
with an invaluable
resource for
assessing and
managing risk and
for strategic
corporate planning.
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas J. Glenn
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Mr. Glenn is
Executive Vice
President, Chief
Operating Officer,
and General Counsel
of the Company and
Executive
Vice-President and
General Counsel of
the Bank of Hampton
Roads. He was
appointed Executive
Vice President and
General Counsel of
the Company and the
Bank in 2007. He
added the
responsibilities of
Chief Operating
Officer of the
Company in February
2009.
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to joining
the Company, Mr.
Glenn practiced law
at Pender & Coward,
P.C. in Virginia
Beach, Virginia.
His law practice
was focused
primarily on small
business clients
and clients
involved in various
aspects of real
estate. His
knowledge of small
business and real
estate finance and
legal issues are
valuable attributes
for the Companys
Board of Directors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Term |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Since |
|
Expires in |
Billy G. Roughton
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Mr. Roughton was a
director of Gateway
until its merger
with the Company on
December 31, 2008
and was Chairman of
the Board of
Gateway Bank until
May 2009. He is
President and CEO
of BGR Development,
a company that
develops and
manages both
residential and
commercial real
estate, positions
he has held since
1974. He also is
Dealer Principal,
President, and CEO
of JEB Management
Services, Inc.,
doing business as
Alliance Nissan,
which is a
franchised
automobile
dealership,
positions he has
held since 2009.
In addition, Mr.
Roughton is the
Managing Partner of
various companies
involved in real
estate development
and project
management for both
residential and
commercial real
estate. He is
directly involved
in the management
of the business
ventures including,
among other
aspects, personnel
management,
financing, project
cash flow, permit
acquisition,
operations, and
overall viability
and corporate
stability. Mr.
Roughton has
substantial
knowledge of the
market for
residential and
commercial real
estate and of
participants in the
market on the Outer
Banks area of North
Carolina.
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry P. Custis, Jr.
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Mr. Custis is
currently the
Chairman of the
Companys Board of
Directors, a
position he has
held since 2010.
Mr. Custis is a
Partner at Custis,
Lewis & Dix, a law
firm in Accomac,
Virginia. He has
practiced law since
1970. He was
chairman of the
board of Shore
until its merger
with the Company on
June 1, 2008 and
currently serves as
chairman of Shore
Bank, a position he
has held since
1997. He also has
served on boards
for Eastern Shore
Citizens Bank from
1974-1975 and
predecessor banks
to the current
SunTrust Banks,
Inc. Mr. Custis is
a former director
of the Eastern
Shore of Virginia
Community
Foundation. He has
practiced law for
39 years, served on
bank boards for 36
years, and been an
investor for 35
years.
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
S-85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Term |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Since |
|
Expires in |
Patrick E. Corbin
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Mr. Corbin is the
Managing
Shareholder of
Corbin & Company,
P.C. He has been a
Certified Public
Accountant since
1979. From 1988 to
2000 he was a
director and
chairman of the
audit committee of
Cenit Bank for
Savings in Norfolk,
Virginia. He holds
a Bachelor of
Science degree in
business with a
major in accounting
from Virginia
Polytechnic
Institute. He is a
member of
professional
organizations
including, the
American Institute
of Certified Public
Accountants, the
Virginia Society of
Certified Public
Accountants, and
the Tidewater
Virginia Society of
Certified Public
Accountants. He is
a director and past
chairman of the
Chesapeake
Alliance. He was
designated as
Super CPA by
Virginia Business
magazine in the
fields of
litigation support
and business
valuation for the
years 2002-2007.
Mr. Corbin brings
significant
experience to the
Board in the fields
of accounting and
small business
expertise.
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William A. Paulette
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Mr. Paulette was a
director of Gateway
until its merger
with the Company on
December 31, 2008
and was a director
of Bank of Richmond
from 1998 to 2007.
He has served on
the board of
Virginia Military
Institute since
2003. He is
founder, President,
and CEO of KBS,
Inc., a
construction firm
based in Richmond,
Virginia. He is
responsible for the
general management
of KBS including
its financial
success.
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Lewis Witt
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Mr. Witt has been
the owner and
president of
Inner-view, Ltd.
since September
1976, a utility
contractor, and has
been the owner of
Greenbrier Self
Storage since 1997.
He previously
served as a
Chairman of Coastal
Virginia Bank until
its acquisition by
the Company in
1992. Mr. Witts
involvement with
utility contracting
acquaints him with
a wide network of
community officials
and other
contractors. He is
knowledgeable
regarding the South
Hampton Roads real
estate and
development market
and many of its
participants.
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
S-86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Term |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Since |
|
Expires in |
Jordan E. Slone
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Mr. Slone has been
the Chairman and
CEO of Harbor Group
International since
July 1985, a
diversified real
estate investment
and financial
services company
with offices in the
United States,
Canada, and Israel
and owns and
manages properties
in five countries,
including
properties in the
Companys markets.
Harbor Groups
property portfolio
of Class A office
buildings and
apartment complexes
exceeds $2.7
billion in value.
Harbor Group also
owns 3.5% of the
third largest
mobile home company
in the United
States.
Additionally, the
company originates
and purchases loans
as well as
commercial
mortgage-backed
securities. Prior
to forming Harbor
Group in 1985, Mr.
Slone was
co-founder and Vice
President of
International
Spring Corporation,
a Portsmouth,
Virginia
manufacturer of
inner box springs
for the mattress
industry. In 1986,
the Slone family
sold International
Spring to Leggett
and Platt, Inc., a
Fortune 500
company. Mr. Slone
also serves on the
Board of Directors
of USA Discounters,
a furniture
retailer and
finance company
with 13 stores
across the United
States. In
addition, he is an
Advisory Board
Member of the
National
Multi-Housing
Council. Mr. Slone
brings significant
knowledge regarding
commercial real
estate and finance
as well as
organizational and
managerial skills
to the Company.
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randal K. Quarles
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Mr. Quarles was
designated to the
Companys Board of
Directors by an
affiliate of The
Carlyle Group
pursuant to the
terms of the
Investment
Agreements. Mr.
Quarles is
currently a
managing director
with The Carlyle
Group in Washington
D.C., a position he
has held since
August 2007. Mr.
Quarles brings a
wealth of
experience related
to the regulation
of financial
institutions. From
August 2001 until
October 2006, Mr.
Quarles served in a
variety of senior
roles at the U.S.
Department of the
Treasury: from
August 2005 to
December 2006 as
Under Secretary of
the Treasury for
Domestic Finance;
from 2002 to 2005
as Assistant
Secretary of the
Treasury for
International
Affairs; and from
2001 to 2002 as the
United States
Executive Director
at the
International
Monetary Fund. From
1984 to 1991 and
from 1993 to 2001,
Mr. Quarles
practiced law in
the private sector
at Davis Polk &
Wardwell, where he
was a partner from
1994 to 2001 and
co-head of the
firms Financial
Institutions Group
from 1996 to 2001.
In the interval
from 1991 to 1993,
Mr. Quarles also
served in the
Treasury
Department: from
1992 to 1993 as
Deputy Assistant
Secretary for
Financial
Institutions
Policy, and from
1991 to 1992 as
Special Assistant
to the Secretary of
the Treasury.
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
S-87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Term |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Since |
|
Expires in |
Hal F. Goltz
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
Mr. Goltz was
designated to the
Companys Board of
Directors by an
affiliate of
Anchorage Advisors
pursuant to the
terms of the
Investment
Agreements. Mr.
Goltz is currently
a Senior Analyst at
Anchorage Advisors,
a position which he
has held since
October 2007. From
June 2004-June
2007, he was an
Event-Driven
Analyst of Citadel
Investment Group.
Mr. Goltz has
significant
experience in the
financial services
industry and
experience with
distressed
financial
institutions.
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert B. Goldstein
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Mr. Goldstein was
designated to the
Companys Board of
Directors by an
affiliate of CapGen
and is a founding
principal of CapGen
Capital Advisors
LLC, New York, New
York, a private
equity fund formed
in 2007. Mr.
Goldstein
previously served
as Chairman of the
Executive Committee
of Great Lakes
Bancorp from 2005
to 2006 and as
President, Chief
Executive Officer
and Chairman of the
Board of Bay View
Capital Corp from
2001 to 2006.
Highly regarded for
identifying new
opportunities for
investment in
community and
regional banking,
Mr.
Goldstein has been
a senior executive
and/or director at
14 financial
institutions over a
career that has
spanned more than
40 years. Mr.
Goldstein is
nationally
recognized for his
expert investing
and operational
experience in
turning around and
implementing growth
strategies for
banks under the
most challenging
circumstances. In
addition, he is
currently a
director of
Seacoast Banking
Corporation of
Florida, Seacoast
National Bank, FNB
Corporation,
BankFIRST and THE
BANKshares, Inc.
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
S-88
NON-DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (INCLUDING NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS)
The following sets forth the names, ages, and business experience for the past five years of
the Companys executive officers (including named executive officers pursuant to Item 402 of
Regulation S-K), other than the ones listed under Directors above.
Lorelle L. Fritsch, 43, is the Companys Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting
Officer, positions she assumed in 2004. Ms. Fritsch also acted as the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company from August 2008 to February 2009 and May 2010 to present and of Bank of Hampton Roads
from August 2008 to the present.
David R. Twiddy, 52, has served as Executive Vice President of the Company since
December 31, 2008 and President, Eastern North Carolina Markets of Bank of Hampton Roads since June
2010. He has also served as President of Gateway Investment Services, Inc. since January 2000.
He was previously President of Bank of Hampton Roads from August 2009 June 2010. He also served
President and Chief Operating Officer of Gateway Bank from March 2005 December 31, 2008, and
President and Chief Executive Officer of Gateway Bank from December 31, 2008 until May 2009. Prior
to March 2005, he served as a Senior Executive Vice President of Gateway Bank from 2000 through
2005 and as President of Gateway Insurance Services, Inc. from
January 2000 until September 2005.
Kevin Pack, 48, has been president and CEO of Gateway Bank Mortgage since December
2009. He was President of Gateway Bank Mortgage from May 2006 to December 2009. Prior to joining
the Company, Mr. Pack was vice president of Charter One Mortgage from November 2005 to April 2006
and Senior Vice President of SunTrust Mortgage prior thereto.
Family relationships
There are no family relationships between any director, executive officer, or person nominated
or chosen by the Company to become a director or executive officer.
Beneficial Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers, and Principal Shareholders of the Company
The following table sets forth for (1) each director and the executive officers named in the
Summary Compensation Table, (2) all directors and executive officers as a group, and (3) each
beneficial owner of more than 5% of Common Stock: (i) the number of shares of Common Stock
beneficially owned on October 12, 2010, and (ii) such persons or groups percentage ownership of
outstanding shares of Common Stock on such date. All of the Companys directors and executive
officers receive mail at the Companys principal executive office at Attn: Douglas J. Glenn,
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Chief Operating Officer at Hampton Roads Bankshares,
Inc., 999 Waterside Dr., Suite 200, Norfolk, Virginia 23510.
This table is based upon information supplied by officers, directors, and principal
shareholders. Unless indicated in the footnotes to this table and subject to community property
laws where applicable, the Company believes that each of the shareholders named in this table has
sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned.
S-89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Percent of |
Name |
|
Beneficially Owned |
|
Outstanding Shares (1) |
Investors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carlyle Financial Services Harbor, L.P.(2) |
|
|
164,956,965 |
(3) |
|
|
24.09 |
|
ACMO-HR, L.L.C.(4) |
|
|
168,713,894 |
(5) |
|
|
24.64 |
|
CapGen Capital Group VI LP(6) |
|
|
122,070,627 |
(7) |
|
|
17.83 |
|
Fir Tree Value Master Fund, L.P.(8) |
|
|
45,193,824 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Affiliates of Davidson Kempner Capital
Management LLC |
|
|
68,274,535 |
(9) |
|
|
9.97 |
|
United States Department of the Treasury |
|
|
53,551,408 |
(10) |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John A. B. Davies, Jr. |
|
|
119,843.05 |
(11) |
|
|
* |
|
Patrick E. Corbin |
|
|
72,641.67 |
(12) |
|
|
* |
|
Henry P. Custis |
|
|
330,496.00 |
(13) |
|
|
* |
|
Douglas J. Glenn |
|
|
113,960.02 |
(14) |
|
|
* |
|
William A. Paulette |
|
|
30,181.00 |
(15) |
|
|
* |
|
Billy Roughton |
|
|
1,241,147.66 |
(16) |
|
|
* |
|
Jordan E. Slone |
|
|
136,674.34 |
(17) |
|
|
* |
|
W. Lewis Witt |
|
|
484,529.93 |
(18) |
|
|
* |
|
Robert B. Goldstein(19) |
|
|
122,070,627 |
(20) |
|
|
18.1 |
|
Hal F. Goltz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randal K. Quarles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Director Executive Officers (not
included above): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lorelle L. Fritsch |
|
|
22,934.51 |
(21) |
|
|
* |
|
David R. Twiddy |
|
|
179,262.00 |
(22) |
|
|
* |
|
Kevin Pack |
|
|
41,815.41 |
(23) |
|
|
* |
|
All Directors and Executive Officers, as
a group
(14 persons) |
|
|
124,844,112.59 |
(24) |
|
|
18.23 |
|
S-90
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1% of outstanding shares. |
(1) |
|
Applicable percentages are based on 684,680,352 shares outstanding on October 12, 2010. Also
includes shares of Common Stock subject to options as of October 12, 2010. Such shares are
deemed to be outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the
individual holding such options, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the
percentage of any other person shown in the table. Does not include shares to be purchased by
the Investors at the Second Closing in connection with the Rights Offering or otherwise under
the terms of the Investment Agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
DBD Cayman, Ltd. is the general partner of TCG Holdings Cayman II, L.P., which is the general
partner of TC Group Cayman Investment Holdings, L.P., which is the sole shareholder of Carlyle
Financial Services, Ltd., which is the general partner of TCG Financial Services, L.P., which
is the general partner of Carlyle Financial Services Harbor, L.P. William E. Conway, Jr.,
Daniel A. Daniello and David M. Rubenstein are the Class A members as well as the directors
of DBD Cayman, Ltd. and, in such capacities, may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of
the shares of Common Stock owned by DBD Cayman, Ltd. William E. Conway, Jr., Daniel A.
DAniello, David M. Rubenstein and Peter Nachtwey are the directors of Carlyle Financial
Services, Ltd. and, in such capacity, may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the
shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Carlyle Financial Services, Ltd. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 164,956,965 shares of Common Stock issued on September 30, 2010 but does not include
7,846,852 shares of Common Stock underlying a warrant that becomes exercisable only upon the
occurrence of a stay of the Written Agreement or the occurrence of a Sale Event. For more
information, see the portion of this Prospectus entitled The Investor Warrants Exercise of
the Investor Warrants. |
|
(4) |
|
All investment and voting decisions with respect to the shares of Common Stock held
by ACMO-HR, L.L.C. are made by Anchorage Advisors, L.L.C. Because of their respective
relationships with ACMO-HR, L.L.C. and each other, each of Anchorage Advisors Management,
L.L.C., Anchorage Advisors, L.L.C., Anchorage Capital Master Offshore, Ltd., ACMO-HR, L.L.C
and Messrs. Anthony L. Davis and Kevin M. Ulrich may be deemed to share voting and disposition
power with respect to the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by ACMO-HR, L.L.C. None
of these persons or entities may be deemed to have sole voting and disposition power with
respect to any shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by ACMO-HR, L.L.C. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 153,020,190 shares of Common Stock issued on September 30, 2010 and 15,693,704
shares of Common Stock underlying a warrant issued that is immediately exercisable, but does
not include 7,846,852 shares of Common Stock underlying a warrant that becomes exercisable
only upon the occurrence of a stay of the Written Agreement or the occurrence of a Sale
Event. For more information, see the portion of this Prospectus entitled The Investor
Warrants Exercise of the Investor Warrants. |
|
(6) |
|
Messrs. John Rose, Robert Goldstein, Eugene A. Ludwig, John Sullivan, Alfred Moses
and Edward Mathias comprise the investment committee of CapGen Capital Group VI LLC, and the
investment committee is responsible for making all decisions with respect to the voting or
disposition of the shares of Common Stock held by CapGen Capital Group VI LLC. CapGen Capital
Group VI LLC is the general partner of CapGen Capital Group VI LP. |
S-91
(7) |
|
Includes 114,223,775 shares of Common Stock issued on September 30, 2010 and
7,846,852 shares of Common Stock underlying a warrant issued that is immediately exercisable,
but does not include 3,923,426 shares of Common Stock underlying a warrant that becomes
exercisable only upon the occurrence of a stay of the Written Agreement or the occurrence of a
Sale Event. For more information, see the portion of this Prospectus entitled The Investor
Warrants Exercise of the Investor Warrants. |
|
(8) |
|
Fir Tree, Inc. may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of Common Stock held by Fir Tree
Value Master Fund, L.P. as a result of being the investment manager of Fir Tree Value Master
Fund, L.P. Fir Tree Value Master Fund, L.P. may direct the vote and disposition of the shares
of Common Stock beneficially held by it. Fir Tree, Inc. has been granted investment
discretion over the Common Stock held by Fir Tree Value Master Fund, L.P., and thus, has the
shared power to direct the vote and disposition of the shares of Common Stock beneficially
held by Fir Tree Value Master Fund, L.P. Fir Tree, Inc. is also the investment manager of Fir
Tree REOF II Master Fund, LLC, and has been granted investment discretion over the Common
Stock held by Fir Tree REOF II Master Fund, LLC, and thus also has the shared power to direct
the vote and disposition of such shares of Common Stock. |
|
(9) |
|
Based upon a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on October 18, 2010, each of Messrs. Thomas L.
Kempner, Jr., Stephen M. Dowicz, Scott E. Davidson, Timothy I. Levart, Robert J. Brivio, Jr.,
Anthony A. Yoseloff, Eric P. Epstein, Avram Z. Friedman and Conor Bastable may be deemed to
share beneficial ownership over an aggregate of 68,274,535 shares of Common Stock. Each of
these individuals disclaims all beneficial ownership as affiliates of a registered investment
advisor, and each such individual disclaims all beneficial ownership except as to the extent
of his pecuniary interest in the shares of Common Stock. The business address of each such
individual is c/o Davidson Kempner Partners, 65 East 55th Street, 19th Floor, New York, New
York 10022. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 52,225,550 shares of Common Stock issued on September 30, 2010, and 1,325,858
shares of Common Stock underlying a warrant issued that is immediately exercisable. |
|
(11) |
|
Includes 25,000.00 shares of fully-vested restricted stock held by the Company for Andy
Davies. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes 204.67 shares owned jointly by Patrick E. Corbin and Brenda C. Corbin (wife), 188.77
shares owned by Brenda C. Corbin, 7,405.17 shares held in a deferred compensation plan for
Patrick E. Corbin, and 44,843.05 shares held in a revocable trust for Patrick E. Corbin. |
|
(13) |
|
Includes 3,000.00 shares held in a revocable trust for Henry P. Custis, 50,000.00 shares held
in a revocable trust jointly for Henry P. Custis and Linda Custis (wife), and 277,496.00
shares owned by Linda Custis. |
|
(14) |
|
Includes 32,000.00 options to purchase shares, 14,831.00 options to purchase shares by
Tiffany K. Glenn (wife), 272.71 shares held in the Companys 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and
Trust for Douglas J. Glenn, 4,633.92 shares held in the Companys 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
and Trust for Tiffany K. Glenn, 16,012.92 shares of restricted stock held by the Company for
Douglas J. Glenn, 1,764.00 shares of restricted stock held by the Company for Tiffany K.
Glenn, 6,409.59 shares held in a Rabbi Trust for Douglas J. Glenn, 7,559.07 shares held in a
Rabbi Trust for Tiffany K. Glenn, 12,217.23 shares owned jointly by Douglas J. Glenn and
Tiffany K. Glenn, 7,928.06 shares held in the Companys director compensation plan for Douglas
J. Glenn, 444.59 shares held by Tiffany K. Glenn as custodian for Grayson Glenn (son), and
444.77 shares held by Tiffany K. Glenn as custodian for Bayler Glenn (daughter). |
S-92
(15) |
|
Includes 29,846.00 shares owned jointly by William A. Paulette and Carolyn E. Paulette (wife). |
|
(16) |
|
Includes 19,765.00 options to purchase shares, 277,091.00 shares owned jointly by Billy
Roughton and Mildred H. Roughton (wife), 6,139.84 shares held in a SEP for Billy Roughton, and
651.81 shares held in a SEP for Mildred H. Roughton. |
|
(17) |
|
Includes 12,000.00 options to purchase shares, 1,720.00 shares held by the 2003 Irrevocable
Slone Childrens Trust, 34,479.28 shares held by Garden Capital Acquisitions, LLC, a company
operated by Jordan E. Slone, and 40,268.25 shares held by Slone Investments. |
|
(18) |
|
Includes 20,013.00 options to purchase shares, 672.48 shares of restricted stock held by the
Company for W. Lewis Witt, 17,670.93 shares owned jointly by W. Lewis Witt and Judith W. Witt
(wife), 1,927.62 shares held in an IRA for W. Lewis Witt, 6,941.36 shares held in an IRA for
Judith W. Witt, 6,177.19 shares owned by Inner-View, Ltd., a company owned by W. Lewis Witt,
and 46,160.00 shares held by Inner-View, Ltd. in a profit sharing plan for W. Lewis Witt. |
|
(19) |
|
As a principal member and member of the investment committee of CapGen, LLC, the general
partner of CapGen Capital Group VI LP, Mr. Goldstein may be deemed to be the indirect
beneficial owner of such shares or shares underlying the warrants under Rule 16a-1(a)(2)
promulgated under the Exchange Act. Pursuant to Rule 16a-1(a)(4) promulgated under the
Exchange Act, Mr. Goldstein disclaims that he is the beneficial owner of such shares, extent
to the extent of his pecuniary interest. |
|
(20) |
|
Includes 114,223,775 shares of Common Stock issued to CapGen Capital Group VI LP on September
30, 2010 and 7,846,852 shares of Common Stock underlying a warrant issued to CapGen Capital
Group VI LP that is immediately exercisable, but does not include 3,923,426 shares of Common
Stock underlying a warrant issued to CapGen Capital Group VI LP that becomes exercisable only
upon the occurrence of a stay of the Written Agreement or the occurrence of a Sale Event.
For more information, see the portion of this Prospectus entitled The Investor Warrants
Exercise of the Investor Warrants. |
|
(21) |
|
Includes 11,827.00 options to purchase shares, 1,695.20 shares owned jointly with David E.
Fritsch (husband), 4,799.55 shares held in the Companys 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust,
1,965.77 shares held in a Rabbi Trust for Lorelle L. Fritsch, and 2,647.00 shares of
restricted stock held by the Company for Lorelle L. Fritsch. |
|
(22) |
|
Includes 47,510.00 options to purchase shares. |
|
(23) |
|
Includes 6,700.00 options to purchase shares, 2,845.41 shares held in the Companys 401(k)
Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, and 24,452.00 shares held in an IRA for Kevin Pack. |
|
(24) |
|
Includes 164,646.00 options to purchase shares. |
S-93
Corporate Governance
Director Independence
The Board is comprised of a majority of independent directors as defined by the NASDAQ listing
standards. The Board of Directors in its business judgment has determined that the following of
its members are independent as defined under the NASDAQ Stock Markets listing standards: Patrick
E. Corbin, Henry P. Custis, William A. Paulette, W. Lewis Witt, Randy K. Quarles, Hal F. Goltz and
Robert B. Goldstein. In reaching this conclusion, the Board of Directors considered that the
Company and its subsidiaries provide services to, and otherwise conduct business with, certain
members of the Board of Directors or members of their immediate families or companies with which
members of the Board of Directors are affiliated. These transactions are discussed in greater
detail in the Certain Relationships and Related Transactions section of this Prospectus.
Based on these standards, the Board of Directors determined that Jordon E. Slone was not
independent because of his affiliation with entities that own the Dominion Tower. The Board of
Directors determined that Billy Roughton was not independent because he owns two branches in North
Carolina. These transactions are discussed in greater detail in the Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions section of this Prospectus. Except for Jordan E. Slone and Billy Roughton,
none of our non-employee directors, their immediate family members, or employees, are engaged in
such relationships with us.
The Board of Directors considered the following transactions between us and certain of our
directors or their affiliates and determined that such transactions did not impair the directors
independence under the above standard:
|
|
|
Loans made by us and our subsidiaries to certain directors and their associates in the
ordinary course of business. |
|
|
|
|
Payments, which were under $200,000 and 5% of such companys consolidated gross
revenues, for storage services made to Greenbrier Self Storage, a business affiliated with
W. Lewis Witt. |
|
|
|
|
Payments, which were under $200,000 and 5% of such companys consolidated gross
revenues, for the lease of property made to Accawmacke Associates, a business affiliated
with Henry P. Custis, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
Transaction-related fees paid to Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C. in connection with
the Private Placement and the relationship that Randal K. Quarles has with this entity. |
|
|
|
|
Transaction-related fees paid to ACMO-HR, L.L.C. in connection with the Private
Placement and the relationship that Hal F. Goltz has with this entity. |
|
|
|
|
Transaction-related fees paid to CapGen Capital Group VI LP in connection with the
Private Placement and the relationship that Robert B. Goldstein has with this entity. |
Committees
The Company currently has separate Audit, Compensation, and Nominating Committees which are
composed of directors who are each an independent director as that term is defined under the
NASDAQ Stock Markets listing standards and the requirements of the SEC.
Previously, however, on May 4, 2009, the Company notified NASDAQ that management of the
Company had become aware of circumstances indicating that the Company may not have been in
compliance with NASDAQ Rules 5605(d) and (e), which require that the nominating and compensation
committees be comprised solely of independent directors, as defined by NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2).
S-94
Management believed that Emil Viola, who was on both such committees, had ceased to be an
independent director. Upon reaching this conclusion, Company management notified the Board of
Directors of the Company, and Mr. Viola was removed from these committees. Mr. Viola has since
retired from the Board of Directors, which was effective on September 30, 2010.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
During 2009, some director-nominees, directors, and executive officers of the Company, their
affiliates, and members of their immediate families were customers of and had loan transactions
with the Company in the normal course of business and are expected to continue to have customer
relationships with the Company in the future. All outstanding loans and commitments included in
such transactions were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and
collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated persons, and
did not involve more than a normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.
At December 31, 2009, loans to executive officers, directors, and their associates amounted to
$90.9 million. During 2009, additional loans and repayments of loans by executive officers,
directors, and their associates were $65.1 million. There were no loans made to directors, or to
entities of which directors are material shareholders or equity owners, which were in excess of the
Companys or Banks unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus.
Jordan E. Slone, a director of the Company, is the managing member of two limited liability
companies that serve as the managers for the legal entities which own and manage the Dominion Tower
at 999 Waterside Drive, Norfolk, Virginia 23510. The Company currently leases the second floor
and a portion of the nineteenth floor of the Dominion Tower for its executive offices and a portion
of the first floor as a financial center. Our lease expires in September 2016, with one renewal
option for a period of seven years. Rent payments made in 2009 totaled $724,021 for the year. The
payments under this lease in 2010 are expected to be approximately the same. His interest in the
transaction is equal to the total lease payments. It is expected that the rent paid will exceed 5%
of the gross revenues of the entities that own Dominion Tower. The terms of this lease are
substantially similar to the terms of leases that are the result of arms length negotiations
between unrelated parties, and the rent is comparable to current market rates. In the opinion of
management, the payments under the Dominion Tower lease are as favorable to the Company as could
have been made with unaffiliated parties.
Bank of Hampton Roads leases its Nags Head, North Carolina and one of its Kitty Hawk, North
Carolina branches from Billy G. Roughton, a director of the Company, and his wife for monthly
payments of $8,000 and $17,096, respectively. The payments under these leases in 2010 are expected
to be approximately the same. Their interest in the transaction is equal to the monthly lease
payments. The term of the Nags Head lease was recently renewed for five years commencing August
2009. Kitty Hawk is a land lease that commenced in April 2006 for a term of twenty years, with
three five-year renewals. In the opinion of management, the payments under these leases are as
favorable to the Company as could have been made with unaffiliated parties.
Shore Bank has a ground lease with Richard F. Hall, Jr., and Virginia B. Hall, the father and
mother of Richard F. Hall, III, a former director of the Company, for its Onley branch. Monthly
payments are $2,006 and the terms of the lease were recently renewed for five years commencing June
2009 with one additional five-year renewal. The payments under this lease in 2010 are expected to
the approximately the same. In the opinion of management, the payments made under the Onley branch
lease are as favorable to the Company as could have been made with unaffiliated parties.
Bank of Hampton Roads made payments during 2009 to Vico Construction Corporation in the amount
of $62,480 and Viola Commercial Group, LLC in the amount of $85,756, for construction of the
Edinburg branch. These entities are affiliated with Emil A. Viola, a former director of the
Company.
In the opinion of management, the payments made to these entities are as favorable to the Company
as could have been made with unaffiliated parties.
S-95
On February 4, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Tiffany Glenn, the
wife of Doug Glenn. The consulting agreement requires a payment in the aggregate amount of
$156,000. As part of her consulting duties, Ms. Glenn is required to assist with investor
relations, public relations, SEC filings, and otherwise assist with the transition of her duties to
the new corporate secretary.
On September 30, 2010, under the terms of a letter agreement with the Company, Carlyle
Investment Management L.L.C. received a $3,000,000 cash fee as well as a warrant to purchase
7,846,859 shares of Common Stock at $0.40 per share, as consideration for assistance provided in
structuring the Companys Private Placement. Randal K. Quarles is a managing director of this
entity and a director of the Company. Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C. is also affiliated with
Carlyle Financial Services Harbor, L.P., who is a participant in the Private Placement.
On September 30, 2010, ACMO-HR, L.L.C. received warrants to purchase 23,540,576 shares of
Common Stock at $0.40 per share. ACMO-HR, L.L.C. is also a participant in the Private Placement.
Anchorage Advisors is affiliated with ACMO-HR, L.L.C. and Hal F. Goltz, a director of the Company,
is a senior analyst of Anchorage Advisors.
On September 30, 2010, CapGen Capital Group VI LP received warrants for the purchase of
11,770,288 shares of Common Stock for $0.40 per share. CapGen Capital Group VI is also a
participant in the Private Placement and Robert B. Goldstein, a director of the Company, is
affiliated with this entity.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Particularly during this challenging environment for banking services and the depressed market
for bank stocks, our Compensation Committee and management believe that shareholder value must
drive executive compensation decisions. While our compensation philosophy has been to maintain a
competitive compensation package to attract qualified executive officers, we have a
pay-for-performance program that bases compensation decisions on the financial performance of the
Company. Due to economic conditions, our Companys return to shareholders during 2009 was not at a
level to which management or our Board of Directors is accustomed. As a result of worsening
economic conditions, compensation to our executive officers was frozen or reduced in 2009, with
bonus and stock compensation all but eliminated.
Our recent mergers have also factored into our executive compensation program. The June 1,
2008 merger combined the Companys and Shores executive management teams and the December 31, 2008
merger combined the Companys and Gateways management teams. Both mergers brought together
different executive compensation programs.
The following plans of Shore were assumed by the Company in connection with its acquisition:
the Shore Financial Corp. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan and the Shore Financial Corp. 401(k) Plan (the
Shore 401(k) Plan). The following plans of Gateway were assumed by the Company in connection
with its acquisition of Gateway: the Gateway Bank and Trust Company Employees Savings & Profit
Sharing Plan and Trust (the Gateway 401(k) Plan); the 1999 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Gateway
Financial Holdings, Inc.; the 1999 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan of Gateway Financial Holdings,
Inc.; the 2001 Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan of Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.; the 2005
Omnibus Stock
S-96
Ownership and Long-Term Incentive Plan of Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.; and the 1999 Bank
of Richmond Stock Option Plan of Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.
During 2009, our Compensation Committee focused on retaining and attracting key executives to
assist in managing though the financial challenges facing the Company. The Compensation Committee
reviews the compensation, including salaries, bonuses, employee benefits, executive incentive
plans, policies, practices, and programs, for the Companys executive officers. We evaluate the
performance of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and, with the assistance of the Chief
Executive Officer, the performance of the other executive officers.
Our intent is to offer compensation packages that will attract and retain high quality
personnel for our organization. We want to provide our employees with incentives that will align
their interests with the long-term and short-term goals of the organization as a whole. Several
components of our compensation packages include vesting periods and stock ownership which are
designed to promote loyalty and longevity among employees. We wish to reward those employees who
are excelling in their respective positions and, by so doing, enhance the future profitability of
our Company.
Changing Regulatory Environment
Our compensation programs during 2009 were also impacted by our participation in the CPP or
the United States Department of the Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). As a result
of participation in TARP, our executives and certain of our employees were subject to compensation
related limitations and restrictions, which applied during the period which any obligation to the
Treasury from financial assistance remains outstanding (disregarding any warrants to purchase our
Common Stock that the Treasury may hold). We believe that, as a result of the conversion of the
Series C-1 Preferred into Common Stock on September 30, 2010, the Company no longer has any
obligation to the Treasury outstanding, and we are no longer subject to these restrictions.
On June 21, 2010, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of Thrift Supervision issued guidance on sound
incentive compensation policies. The guidance includes three broad principles:
|
|
|
Incentive compensation arrangements should balance risk and financial results in a
manner that does not encourage employees to expose their organizations to imprudent risks. |
|
|
|
|
A banking organizations risk-management processes and internal controls should
reinforce and support the development and maintenance of balanced incentive compensation
arrangements. |
|
|
|
|
Banking organizations should have strong and effective corporate governance to help
ensure sound compensation practices, including active and effective oversight by the board
of directors. |
The guidance is immediately effective under the agencies power to regulate the safety and
soundness of financial institutions. The guidance will apply to all U.S. financial institutions.
As required by the TARP, and consistent with the other regulatory guidance mentioned above, a
number of amendments were made to our executive compensation program. The amendments included:
|
|
|
Performance-based bonuses and other incentive payments to the five most highly
compensated employees, and all other employees were not made during fiscal 2009. |
S-97
|
|
|
The change of control agreements previously applicable to senior executive officers, the
next five most highly compensated employees, and all other employees were suspended during
fiscal 2009. |
Our Board also adopted an Excessive or Luxury Expenditure Policy that is consistent with the
TARP requirements and that can be found on the Companys website. This policy, which applies to
all our employees, covers expenditures for entertainment or events, office and facility
renovations, aviation or other transportation services, and other activities or events. These
expenditures are prohibited excessive or luxury expenditures to the extent they are not reasonable
expenditures for staff development, reasonable performance incentives, or other similar reasonable
measures conducted in the normal course of the Companys business operations.
In addition, the Company is prohibited, under section 18(k) of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Act and 12 C.F.R. Part 359, from making any severance or indemnification payments to its employees
for so long as Bank of Hampton Roads or the Company remain in troubled condition under applicable
federal regulations. To the extent that our agreements, plans or other arrangements described
herein provide for severance or indemnification payments, we may be prohibited from making such
payments by 12 C.F.R. Part 359.
Elements of Compensation
The challenge for management and the Compensation Committee is to motivate, retain and reward
key performers for working harder and smarter than ever in a very difficult banking environment. At
the same time, we recognize that some of the tools we would use to accomplish these objectives have
been taken away due to the TARP compensation restrictions. In 2009, management and the
Compensation Committee, believing in the long term validity of our compensation program, attempted
to preserve the integrity of that program to the extent possible, while respecting the requirements
and restrictions of TARP.
Our compensation packages currently consist of the following elements:
Salary: We consider many factors in determining the salary component for each of the
executive officers. Because one of our objectives is to attract and retain high quality personnel,
historically, we have conducted surveys of other financial institutions and reviewed data from a
peer group within our region taking into account asset size and revenue base to ensure that we are
comparing ourselves to similar organizations. In fiscal 2009, however, no such survey or peer
review was conducted and no benchmarking was used in setting annual compensation.
Salary for each executive officer is determined based on his or her individual and group
responsibilities and achievements during the preceding year and such determination includes
judgments based on performance evaluations, regulatory examination results, efficiency in
performance of duties, and demonstrated leadership skills. Decisions to increase or decrease
compensation materially from the prior period are influenced by the amount of new responsibilities
taken on by the executive officers and their contributions to the profitability of the Company.
When we determined the 2009 salary level for our executive officers who were employed by the
Company during 2008, including our Named Executive Officers, we also took into consideration the
following financial accomplishments during 2008:
|
|
|
An increase in net income of 5.43% over 2007. |
|
|
|
|
An increase in assets of 447.28% over 2007. |
S-98
|
|
|
An increase in loans of 445.87% over 2007. |
|
|
|
|
An increase in deposits of 432.18% over 2007. |
As a result of such accomplishments, initially a determination was made to generally hold
constant the compensation of the Companys existing executive officers, including its existing
Named Executive Officers. Very early in fiscal year 2009, it also became apparent that making most
incentive payments to executive officers might not be appropriate, given the Companys likely
performance under existing economic conditions. As a result, the compensation to our executive
officers, including our Named Executive Officers, was frozen or reduced, with bonus and stock
compensation all but eliminated. In freezing or reducing our compensation, the Company
specifically considered worsening economic conditions in the markets in which our borrowers operate
and that the levels of loan delinquencies and defaults that we were experiencing by mid 2009 were
substantially higher than historical levels.
The salaries of Messrs. Davies and Petrovich, who both joined the Company in 2009, were based
on negotiated amounts between these executives and the Company, taking into account their
respective experience level, the financial condition of the Company and restrictions imposed due to
the Companys participation in the Treasurys CPP.
The executive officers do not play a role in the compensation process except for the Chief
Executive Officer, John A. B. Davies, Jr., and former Chief Executive Officer, Jack W. Gibson, each
of whom would present information regarding the other executive officers to the Compensation
Committee for their consideration. Neither Mr. Davies nor Mr. Gibson were ever present while the
Compensation Committee deliberated on their compensation package.
Several of our named executive officers also had access to Company automobiles for personal
use in 2009. At present, however, except for Mr. Davies, none of the named executive officers
retains personal use of a Company automobile.
Employment Agreements:
John A. B. Davies, Jr. We have an employment agreement with our President and Chief Executive
Officer, John A. B. Davies, Jr. Mr. Davies joined the Company as President and Chief Executive
Officer effective July 14, 2009. The Company and Mr. Davies have entered into a three-year
employment contract, which provides for an initial annual salary of $500,000. He is eligible to
participate in all cash and non-cash employee benefit plans maintained by the Company for its
senior executive officers, as may be determined by the Board of Directors. All of the plans are
more fully discussed herein. Other benefits extended to Mr. Davies include the personal use of a
Company automobile.
Subject to certain limitations, Mr. Davies is to receive annually restricted stock grants
equal to the lesser of 25% of his annual base salary on the date of grant or the maximum the
Company is able to provide under the applicable restricted stock plan and each such annual award of
restricted shares shall be subject to vesting as follows: one-third of such shares shall vest as of
the second anniversary of the date of grant; one-third of such shares shall vest on the second
anniversary of the date of grant to the extent the Company attains reasonable performance standards
for the year in which the grant occurred; and (iii) one-third of such shares shall vest upon the
Companys attainment of reasonable performance standards for the three-year period, beginning with
the year in which the grant occurred.
In the event Mr. Davies is terminated other than for cause or resigns for good reason (as
those terms are defined in his employment agreement), other than in connection with a change of
control (as that term is defined in his employment agreement), he will be entitled to receive an
amount equal to his base salary then in effect that he would have received for the remainder of the
term of the agreement.
S-99
If Mr. Davies is terminated other than for cause or resigns for good reason within
one year after a change of control, he will be entitled to receive an amount equal to the excess,
if any, of 2.99% of his annualized includable compensation of the base period as determined under
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. Mr. Davies is not entitled to any payment, acceleration
or other benefit pursuant to his employment agreement as a result of the Private Placement and the
transactions related thereto. In the event that Mr. Davies is not able to receive the payments
described above due to the restrictions on severance and change of control payments under TARP, the
Company will engage Mr. Davies as a consultant for a period of two years at an annual fee of
$500,000.
The Companys obligation to make the payments provided for in Mr. Davies employment agreement
is qualified in its entirety by the Companys ability to make such payments under applicable law.
To the extent any payment is prohibited by 12 C.F.R. Part 359 or to the extent that any
governmental approval of any payment is not received or such payment would be prohibited by any
state or federal statutes or regulations, the Company will not be required to make such payment to
Mr. Davies.
On December 30, 2009, Mr. Davies received a fully-vested 75,000 share award of restricted
stock and a cash bonus of $57,895. This award was made as an inducement for joining the Company
earlier in the year in lieu of receiving a larger signing bonus. Of the 75,000 shares of restricted
stock, 50,000 shares were granted under the Companys 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.
Lorelle Fritsch. Mrs. Fritsch previously entered into a five-year employment contract with
Bank of Hampton Roads, which includes payment of a severance amount in the event of a
change-in-control of the Company, which may be paid unless the Treasury Department or other
government agency issues guidance that would prohibit such payments, such as EESA and ARRA. Mrs.
Fritsch is not entitled to any payment, acceleration or other benefit pursuant to his employment
agreement as a result of the Private Placement and the transactions related thereto. Her annual
salary was $181,166 in 2009. Her contract was amended as of July 23, 2008 to make the Company a
party in addition to Bank of Hampton Roads. If permitted by law, the severance amount will be
equivalent to three times the average of her previous three years salary minus one dollar payable
over a sixty-month period. Mrs. Fritschs employment contract will renew in five-year increments.
Douglas J. Glenn. Mr. Glenn entered into a six year employment contract in 2007. His annual
salary was $400,000 in 2009. Mr. Glenn is eligible to participate in the following compensation
programs offered by the Company: Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Executive Officers Bonus
Plan, Stock Incentive Plan and the Executive Savings Plan. In addition, Mr. Glenn is eligible to
participate in all of the plans and arrangements that are generally available to all of the
Companys salaried employees, including the Companys 401(k) plan. Other benefits extended to Mr.
Glenn in 2009 include the personal use of a Company automobile and club dues. In the event of a
change-in-control of the Company, Mr. Glenn will be eligible to receive a payment consistent with
change-in-control payments for other named executive officers. Mr. Glenn is not entitled to any
payment, acceleration or other benefit pursuant to his employment agreement as a result of the
Private Placement and the transactions related thereto. Mr. Glenns employment contract will renew
in five year increments after the initial term upon similar terms as other executive officers of
the Company.
Mr. Glenn also has a supplemental employment retirement plan. The plan provides benefits to
Mr. Glenn at age 65 in the amount of one half of his final three years of service for a period of
15 years following retirement. The plan vests ratably over fifteen years beginning after the fifth
anniversary of service. This plan contains change-in-control provisions consistent with those of
other executive officers. For purposes of this supplemental employment retirement plan, the
Private Placement and the transactions related thereto do not constitute a change-in-control.
S-100
Upon his hiring, Mr. Glenn was granted incentive stock options for 20,000 shares of Common
Stock that vests in years five through ten of Mr. Glenns employment, or immediately upon a
change-of-control event and other customary circumstances.
David Twiddy. On December 31, 2008, Gateway Bank (now Bank of Hampton Roads) entered into an
employment agreement with David R. Twiddy. The agreement has a term of thirty-six months with an
initial base salary of $425,000. The agreement provides for certain payments under specified
circumstances including a change-in-control of the Company. Mr. Twiddy is not entitled to any
payment, acceleration or other benefit pursuant to his employment agreement as a result of the
Private Placement and the transactions related thereto. The agreement restricts Mr. Twiddy from
employment that competes with the Company or any of its subsidiaries for one year following
termination of employment. In addition Mr. Twiddy is restricted from the solicitation of business
of the Companys or any of its affiliates customers and solicitation of employment of the
Companys or any of its affiliates employees for a period of one year following termination of
employment. The agreement further prohibits the disclosure of proprietary information. In addition,
the Company entered into a restrictive covenant agreement with Mr. Twiddy that restricts Mr. Twiddy
from employment that competes with the Company and any of its affiliates for a period of time
specified in the covenant. Mr. Twiddy received $425,000 in net compensation for entering into the
covenant and to which the Company paid the taxes on.
Kevin Pack. We do not have a written employment agreement with our President of Gateway Bank
Mortgage, Kevin Pack. Mr. Pack receives an annual salary of $325,000, and additional commissions
based on the number of loans that may be sold by Gateway Mortgage in the secondary mortgage market.
He is eligible to participate in all employee benefit plans maintained by the Company. Other
benefits extended to Mr. Pack in 2009 include the personal use of a Company vehicle.
Neal Petrovich. Mr. Petrovich had no written employment contract with the Company. His
initial annual salary was $200,000, but was raised to $325,000 during the year to be consistent
with the compensation of other executives in the Company. Mr. Petrovich was eligible to
participate in the following compensation programs offered by the Company: Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan, Executive Officers Bonus Plan, Stock Incentive Plan and the Executive Savings
Plan. In addition, Mr. Petrovich was eligible to participate in all of the plans and arrangements
that are generally available to all of the Companys salaried employees. Other benefits extended
to Mr. Petrovich in 2009 included the personal use of a Company automobile. He also received a
moving allowance to assist with his relocation expenses. As an incentive to join the company, Mr.
Petrovich was also issued 5,000 shares of restricted stock.
Jack Gibson. We had an employment agreement with Mr. Gibson which was automatically renewable
in five-year increments and renewed automatically in 2007. During 2008, the Company entered into
an amendment to the employment agreements with Jack W. Gibson to reflect provisions required by
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). This agreement was
terminated on May 18, 2009, under the terms of Mr. Gibsons retirement from the Company. Mr.
Gibsons salary was determined each year by the Compensation Committee, but in no event was to be
less than $50,000. Mr. Gibsons employment agreement also provided that Mr. Gibson may receive
other compensation and benefits as the Board of Directors elects to provide to all of our
employees.
In connection with his retirement, Mr. Gibson entered into a separation agreement with the
Company (the Separation Agreement). Under the Separation Agreement, the Company agreed to grant
Mr. Gibson the option, on January 4, 2010 (Option Date) to require the Company to purchase
100,000 of his shares of the Company, free and clear of all liens, for the closing price of the
Companys stock on the Option Date. Should Mr. Gibson have elected this option, the purchase price
for said shares would have been paid in twelve (12) equal monthly installments with the first installment being paid
to the Executive on the Option Date. Mr. Gibson elected not to sell his shares to the Company.
S-101
Mr. Gibson will retain his benefits under the following Company plans: Supplemental
Retirement Plan, 401(k), Executive Savings, Stock Options, Restricted Stock, and Director Deferred
Compensation (Benefit Plans) to the extent permitted by law.
Mr. Gibson is to provide consulting services to the Company as an independent contractor for a
period of three years (the Consultancy Period) for the total sum of $1,300,000 to be paid in the
amount of $600,000 beginning on May 18, 2009 and $700,000 on January 1, 2010. As of the date of
this Prospectus, Mr. Gibson received $600,000 of this fee. The remainder of the fee will be paid
when the Company is permitted to do so. Mr. Gibson elected to continue participation in the
Companys medical plans as provided by COBRA. As a result, the Company is paying 100% of Mr.
Gibsons COBRA premiums for 18 months. In addition, the Company agreed to turn over ownership of a
Company vehicle Mr. Gibson had been using for business purposes. Further, during the Consulting
Period, the Company agreed to reimburse Mr. Gibson for his membership dues at Greenbrier Country
Club. Mr. Gibson is also subject to a non-solicitation, confidentiality, and non-competition
agreement. The $700,000 sum has not yet been paid by the Company, and Mr. Gibson has filed a
lawsuit seeking this payment pursuant to the consulting agreement. The parties to the litigation
disagree as to the amount due to Mr. Gibson under such agreement.
During May 2009, Mr. Gibson also began receiving payments of $900 per month under his
Directors Retirement Plan Agreement and received total payments of $7,200 during 2009. The
Directors Retirement Plan Agreement provides that a payment equal to 50% of the monthly board fees
will be paid beginning on the first month following conclusion of service from the Board of
Directors and continue for a term determined by a formula based on years of board service. The
term of Mr. Gibsons monthly payments is 11 years. Also, Mr. Gibson began receiving payments of
$1,500 per month under his Directors Emeritus Program Agreement and received total payment of
$12,000 during 2009. The Director Emeritus Program Agreement provides a $1,500 monthly payment
beginning on the first month following conclusion of service from the Board and continues for a 10
year term.
Incentive Plan: In order to focus our executive officers attention on the profitability of
the organization as a whole, we pay cash incentives based upon our annual financial performance as
measured by return on average assets. Given the operating losses experienced in the first half of
2009, a decision was reached that the Company would not pay bonuses to executive officers under
this plan during 2009.
2006 Stock Incentive Plan: We strongly encourage all directors and employees to own stock in
the Company. We feel that stock ownership among employees fosters loyalty and longevity and is an
excellent method for aligning employee interests with the long-term goals of the organization and
our shareholders. To facilitate stock ownership, the compensation committee of the Board of
Directors adopted the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan on March 14, 2006. This plan was approved by the
shareholders of the Company at the April 25, 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Under the plan,
shares of our Common Stock may be issued to our directors, officers, key employees, consultants,
and advisors in the form of restricted stock awards, incentive stock awards, incentive stock
options, and non-statutory stock options. Each type of award under the plan is subject to
different requirements and the awards may be conditioned by the performance of the officers and
their contribution to the performance of the Company. The plan provides that no person shall be
granted incentive stock options worth more than $100,000 based on their exercise price or 50,000
shares of restricted stock or stock options during any calendar year. During 2009, the Company
granted no stock options or stock awards under this plan, except to Mr. Davies.
S-102
Executive Savings Plan: We have implemented an Executive Savings Plan with executive officers
and certain other officers whereby an initial contribution of the officers salary made by the
officer will be matched 100% each year by the Company as long as the officers employment with the
Company continues and the officer is in good standing. There were contributions of $35,134 to the
Executive Savings Plan during 2009. The purpose of this plan is to promote employment longevity
and to provide key employees with a retirement savings vehicle. Contributions into this plan may
be used to purchase employer stock or may be placed in savings accounts for the benefit of each
individual participant. Dividends paid on Common Stock held in the plan are reinvested. Amounts
may only be withdrawn from the plan upon termination of employment at which time the participant
may elect to take the distribution as a lump sum payment or in annual installments. The plan also
provides for additional payments to be made to the officers upon termination of employment
following a change of control of the Company. Additional information regarding these payments can
be found further in this document.
Defined Contribution Plan: We provide defined contribution 401(k) plans at each of our
subsidiary banks. The Company may also make an additional discretionary contribution to the plans.
Participants are fully vested in their contributions and the Companys match immediately and
become fully vested in the Companys discretionary contributions after three years of service.
Under the Bank of Hampton Roads 401(k) plan, all employees who are 21 years of age and have
completed one year of service are eligible to participate. Participants may contribute up to 20%
of their compensation, subject to statutory limitations and the Company matches 100% of the
employees contributions up to 4% of salary.
Under the Shore Bank 401(k) plan, all employees who are 18 years of age and have completed 3
months of service are eligible to participate. Participants may contribute up to 15% of their
compensation and the Company matches 100% up to 3% of the employees contributions and 50% of the
next 3%.
Under the Gateway 401(k) plan, all employees over the age of 18 that have completed three
months of service are eligible to participate. The Company matches 100% of the employees
contributions up to 6% of the employees salary.
Supplemental Retirement Agreement: The Company has entered into Supplemental Retirement
Agreements with several key officers. The following gives a description of the plan.
We entered into a Supplemental Retirement Agreement with Jack W. Gibson on January 1, 1993.
The purpose of the agreement was to provide retirement benefits for Mr. Gibson that will reward his
years of service to the Company. Under this agreement, Mr. Gibson is eligible to receive an annual
benefit payable in 15 installments equal to 50% of his benefit computation base following the
attainment of his plan retirement date, November 9, 2010. In the event that Mr. Gibsons
employment is terminated prior to November 9, 2010, the Company is obligated to pay Mr. Gibson a
lump sum payment equal to the present value of his accrued benefit. The benefit computation base
is calculated as his average compensation including bonuses from us over the three highest
compensation completed calendar years prior to the year during which the plan retirement date
occurs. The estimated annual benefits payable upon retirement at the plan retirement date are
$357,826. Mr. Gibson became fully vested in the plan in January 2008. On May 27, 2008, Bank of
Hampton Roads and Mr. Gibson entered into an amendment to Mr. Gibsons Supplemental Retirement
Agreement. The amendment reflects provisions required by Section 409A of the Code and clarified
the benefits to be paid in the event of Mr. Gibsons death prior to retirement. In connection with
the lawsuit by Mr. Gibson described above, he is also seeking payment pursuant to the Supplemental
Retirement Agreement. The parties to the litigation disagree as to the amount due to Mr. Gibson
under such agreement.
S-103
Gateway Bank entered into a Supplemental Retirement Agreement with David R. Twiddy on December
24, 2008. The purpose of the agreement is to provide a retirement vehicle for Mr. Twiddy that will
reward his years of service to Gateway Bank. Under this agreement, Mr. Twiddy is eligible to
receive an annual benefit payable in 15 installments equal to 70% of his benefit computation base
following the attainment of his plan retirement date, September 24, 2022. The benefit computation
base is calculated as his average compensation including bonuses from us over the three highest
compensation completed calendar years prior to the year during which the plan retirement date
occurs. The estimated annual benefits payable upon retirement at the plan retirement date are
$601,656.
We entered into a Supplemental Retirement Agreement with Douglas J. Glenn on November 1, 2007.
The purpose of the agreement is to provide a retirement vehicle for Mr. Glenn that will reward his
years of service to the Company. Under this agreement, Mr. Glenn is eligible to receive an annual
benefit payable in 15 installments equal to 50% of his benefit computation base following the
attainment of his plan retirement date in 2031. The benefit computation base is calculated as his
average compensation including bonuses from us over the three highest compensation completed
calendar years prior to the year during which the plan retirement date occurs. The estimated
annual benefits payable upon retirement at the plan retirement date are $549,632. Mr. Glenn will
become fully vested in the plan in November 2022.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP). Bank of Hampton Roads adopted a SERP in
2005. The only named executive officer currently participating in the SERP is Lorelle Fritsch.
The purpose of the agreement is to provide a retirement vehicle for Mrs. Fritsch that will reward
her years of service to the Company. Under this agreement, Mrs. Fritsch is eligible to receive an
annual benefit payable in 15 installments of $50,000 for a total of $750,000 commencing upon the
first month after such executive attains age 65. The benefits shall, to the extent in compliance
with applicable law, vest ratably from the date of the sixtieth month of participation in the SERP
through the executive attaining age 65.
Perquisites and other benefits. In addition to the benefits described above, we provide our
executive officers with certain other perquisites that the Compensation Committee considers to be
usual and customary within our peer group to remain competitive in the market for experienced
management. For instance, named executive officers receive partial reimbursement from the Company
of their country club expenses and the use of an automobile. Gateway paid premiums for dependent
health insurance coverage for its executive officers and reimburses executive officers for the
payment of federal and state income taxes imposed as a result of the grant of restricted stock.
Split Dollar Arrangements. Gateway Bank (now Bank of Hampton Roads) is a party to a Split
Dollar Agreement with Mr. Twiddy, which provides for the division of the death proceeds on the life
insurance policy on his life, which is owned by Bank of Hampton Roads, with his designated
beneficiary. Under the Split Dollar Agreement, if Mr. Twiddy dies, his beneficiary shall be
entitled to a fixed cash benefit from Bank of Hampton Roads. The amount is approximately $2,535,500
for Mr. Twiddy. Bank of Hampton Roads is not permitted to sell, surrender, or transfer ownership
of any life insurance policy without replacing the policy with a comparable policy to cover the
benefit provided by the Split Dollar Agreement. Bank of Hampton Roads may not terminate or amend
the Split Dollar Agreements without the officers consent. All life insurance policies are subject
to the claims of creditors.
Risk Assessment
We reviewed our compensation programs and policies for all employees and determined that they
are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. We believe our
compensation programs are designed with the appropriate balance of risk and reward in relation to
our Companys overall business strategy. In addition, our executive compensation programs no
longer provide for the payment of performance based-bonuses, which significantly reduces the amount
of excessive risk-taking that our compensation programs might impose.
S-104
Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows the compensation of our principal executive officers and principal
financial officers during fiscal 2009, as well as our three most highly compensated executive
officers (other than our principal executive officer and principal financial officers) during the
year. References throughout this Prospectus to our named executive officers or named
executives refer to each of the individuals named in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
|
Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
Name and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Option |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Total |
|
Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
|
Salary ($) |
|
|
Bonus ($) |
|
|
(h)($) |
|
|
Awards (i)($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Earnings (j)($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
John A. B. Davies, Jr. |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
242,628 |
(k) |
|
$ |
57,895 |
|
|
$ |
123,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,913 |
(a) |
|
|
436,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neal A. Petrovich |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
234,006 |
(l) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,976 |
(b) |
|
|
309,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lorelle L.
Fritsch (m) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
181,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,099 |
|
|
|
11,405 |
(c) |
|
|
208,670 |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
131,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,046 |
|
|
|
44,022 |
|
|
|
213,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Twiddy |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,945 |
|
|
|
109,605 |
(d) |
|
|
740,550 |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
855,307 |
|
|
|
1,490,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas J. Glenn |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,193 |
|
|
|
75,302 |
(e) |
|
|
530,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Pack |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
353,718 |
(n) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,344 |
(f) |
|
|
373,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack W. Gibson |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
241,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559,676 |
|
|
|
746,138 |
(g) |
|
|
1,546,910 |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
530,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
517,851 |
|
|
|
195,811 |
|
|
|
1,323,162 |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
460,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,600 |
|
|
|
402,815 |
|
|
|
101,898 |
|
|
|
1,130,313 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
This column includes $11,850 in fees for acting as a director of the Company and
$63 for personal use of a Company automobile. |
S-105
|
|
|
(b) |
|
This column includes $29,126 for moving expenses and Greenbrier Country Club dues of $1,884
and $2,966 for personal use of a Company automobile. |
|
(c) |
|
This column includes $7,000 in 401(k) match, $1,556 for personal use of an automobile, and a
$2,849 tax gross-up payment related to the vesting of restricted stock. |
|
(d) |
|
This column includes a $14,700 in 401(k) match, $1,155 for personal use of an automobile, an
$84,138 tax gross-up payment related to the vesting of restricted stock, The Pines Lake Country
Club dues of $1,925, Town Center City Club dues of $70, YMCA dues of $492, and BOLI imputed income
of $7,125. |
|
(e) |
|
This column includes $9,800 in 401(k) match, $5,111 for personal use of an automobile, a
$9,785 tax gross-up payment related to the vesting of restricted stock, and Cavalier Golf & Yacht
Club dues of $1,206. This total also includes $49,400 in fees for acting as a director of the
Company, consisting of: $21,600 in cash and a $27,800 stock award. |
|
(f) |
|
This column includes $14,700 in 401(k) match, $660 for personal use of an automobile, Capital
City Club dues of $1,881, State Club dues of $1,215, and BOLI imputed income of $888. |
|
(g) |
|
This column includes $9,167 in 401(k) match, $60,739 for personal use of an automobile, a
$10,046 tax gross-up payment related to the vesting of restricted stock, and Greenbrier Country
Club dues of $4,136. This total also includes $42,850 in fees for acting as a director of the
Company, consisting of: $14,400 in cash and a $28,450 stock award. This column also includes
payments to Mr. Gibson of $7,200 under his Retirement Plan Agreement and $12,000 in payments under
his Directors Emeritus Program Agreement. This amount also includes $600,000 Mr. Gibson received
under his consulting arrangement with the Company, which he received effective upon his resignation
on May 18, 2009. |
|
(h) |
|
This column represents stock awards granted by the Company. The expense was calculated
according to ASC Topic 718 (formerly known as FASB Statement 123R). Additional information
regarding stock-based compensation expense can be found in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements filed with our 2009 Annual Report. Stock awards are expensed over the vesting periods
established at the time the grants are made by the Company. |
|
(i) |
|
This column represents the expense to the Company related to stock options granted. The
expense was calculated according to ASC Topic 718 (formerly known as FASB Statement 123R).
Additional information regarding stock-based compensation expense can be found in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements filed with our 2009 Annual Report. Stock options granted to
employees and Directors during 2008, and 2007 and 2006 have exercise prices equal to the market
value of our Common Stock on the grant date. |
|
(j) |
|
This column represents the change in the benefit obligation for the Supplemental Retirement
Agreements from the previous year to the current year. These amounts were expensed during the year
and a liability was recorded on the Companys balance sheet which represents the present value of
payments that will be made to employees under the Supplemental Retirement Agreements upon their
retirement. We have funded the Supplemental Retirement Agreements within this column with life
insurance policies which name the company as beneficiary. These life insurance policies will
reimburse the Company for all expenses related to the Supplemental Retirement Agreements including
the policy premiums and the payments made to employees upon their retirement. |
|
(k) |
|
This amount represents part-year compensation due to Mr. Davies having joined the Company on
July 14, 2009. |
S-106
|
|
|
(l) |
|
This amount represents part-year compensation due to Mr. Petrovich having joined the Company
on February 17, 2009. |
|
(m) |
|
Ms. Fritsch acted as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company from August 2008 to February
2009 and May 2010 to present. |
|
(n) |
|
includes sales commissions of $28,718. |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table presents all plan-based awards granted to the named executive officers
during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Stock |
|
|
Awards: Number of |
|
|
Exercise or Base |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: Number of |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Price of Option |
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Stock or |
|
|
Underlying Options |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Value of Stock and |
|
Name |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Units (#) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
($/Sh) |
|
|
Option Awards ($) |
|
John A. B. Davies, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
123,750 |
|
Neal A. Petrovich |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,500 |
|
Lorelle L. Fritsch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Twiddy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas J. Glenn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Pack |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack W. Gibson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents 75,000 fully-vested shares of restricted stock, 50,000 shares of which were
granted under the Companys 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. |
S-107
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table
The following table presents outstanding stock option and non-vested stock awards as of
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value of |
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares or |
|
|
Shares or Units of |
|
|
|
Unexercised Options |
|
|
Unexercised Options |
|
|
Option Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of Stock That |
|
|
Stock That Have Not |
|
|
|
(#) |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Option Expiration |
|
|
Have Not Vested |
|
|
Vested |
|
Name |
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Date |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
($) |
|
John A. B. Davies, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neal A. Petrovich |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
$7,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lorelle L. Fritsch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
$12.00 |
|
|
|
12/31/16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.65 |
|
|
|
12/31/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.52 |
|
|
|
12/31/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.60 |
|
|
|
12/31/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.00 |
|
|
|
12/31/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
12/31/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
12/31/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Twiddy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
21.87 |
|
|
|
08/28/16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.67 |
|
|
|
11/24/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.16 |
|
|
|
08/02/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.64 |
|
|
|
11/20/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas J. Glenn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
12.25 |
|
|
|
11/01/17 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
8,300 |
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
12/31/16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
12/31/16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Pack |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
20.99 |
|
|
|
08/31/17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack W. Gibson |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
12/31/16 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
6,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
12/31/16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.65 |
|
|
|
01/01/16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.65 |
|
|
|
12/31/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.65 |
|
|
|
12/31/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.55 |
|
|
|
01/01/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.52 |
|
|
|
12/31/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.52 |
|
|
|
12/31/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.60 |
|
|
|
12/31/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.60 |
|
|
|
12/31/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.60 |
|
|
|
12/31/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
12/31/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
12/31/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
12/31/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
12/31/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
12/31/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
12/31/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the above stock options were fully vested on the grant date except for the stock
options granted on December 31, 2006 and November 1, 2007. Of the stock options granted on
December 31, 2006, Mr. Gibsons options have a four-year vesting schedule and Ms. Fritschs options
have a five-year vesting schedule. All stock options have 10-year terms. Mr. Gibsons non-vested
stock awards were to vest over the seven-year period ending January 1, 2016.
S-108
Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
The following table presents the stock options exercised and the stock awards vested for the
named executive officers during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Acquired on |
|
Value Realized on |
|
Number of Shares |
|
Value Realized on |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Exercise |
|
Acquired on Vesting |
|
Vesting |
Name |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
John A. B. Davies, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neal A. Petrovich |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,300 |
|
Lorelle L. Fritsch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
22,450 |
|
David Twiddy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas J. Glenn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
44,999 |
|
Kevin Pack |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack W. Gibson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,352 |
|
|
|
79,492 |
|
Pension Benefits Table
The following table presents information related to the Supplemental Retirement Agreements for
the named executive officers as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Years |
|
Present Value of |
|
Payments During |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credited Service |
|
Accumulated Benefit |
|
Last Fiscal Year |
Name |
|
Plan Name |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
John A. B. Davies, Jr. |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neal A. Petrovich |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lorelle L. Fritsch |
|
Supplemental |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Retirement Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Twiddy |
|
Supplemental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas J. Glenn |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Pack |
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack W. Gibson |
|
Supplemental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,973,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-109
The Supplemental Retirement Agreements are discussed in further detail in the Compensation
Disclosure and Analysis section of this Prospectus. The discount rate used to calculate the
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit was 7% under the terms of the plan agreement.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
The following table presents information related to the Executive Savings Plan for the named
executive officers during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Aggregate Balance |
|
|
Contributions in |
|
Contributions in |
|
Aggregate Earnings |
|
Withdrawals/ |
|
at Last Fiscal |
|
|
Last Fiscal Year |
|
Last Fiscal Year |
|
in Last Fiscal Year |
|
Distributions |
|
Year-End |
Name |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
John A. B. Davies, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Neal A. Petrovich |
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,829 |
|
Lorelle L. Fritsch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49,427 |
|
David Twiddy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Douglas J. Glenn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,247 |
|
Kevin Pack |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Jack W. Gibson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,580 |
|
The Executive Savings Plan is discussed in further detail in the Compensation Disclosure
and Analysis section of this Prospectus. Amounts disclosed above in the Registrant Contributions
in Last Fiscal Year and Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year columns were also included in the
All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table above.
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control
The table below shows the present value of estimated Company payments under the employment
agreements, equity plans, and other non-qualified plans described above, upon a termination of
employment, including the Company gross-up payments for excise tax on the parachute payments upon a
change of control, for each of Mr. Davies, Mr. Petrovich, Ms. Fritsch, Mr. Twiddy, Mr. Glenn, Mr.
Pack, and Mr. Gibson.(1) The payments represent the maximum possible payments under
interpretations and assumptions most favorable to the executive officer. All termination events,
except retirement, are assumed to occur on December 31, 2009 and termination upon a change of
control is assumed to be involuntary by the Company or its successor. Termination upon retirement
is assumed to occur upon the officers normal retirement date. Company payments to a terminated
executive may be more or less than the amounts contained in the various agreements and plans. In
addition, certain amounts currently are vested and, thus, do not represent an increased amount of
benefits.
S-110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Davies |
|
|
Petrovich |
|
|
Fritsch |
|
|
Glenn |
|
|
Pack |
|
|
Twiddy |
|
|
Gibson(2) |
|
Company Payment Upon
Change-in-control |
|
|
2,040,793 |
|
|
|
245,515 |
|
|
|
1,704,377 |
|
|
|
4,948,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,978,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Retirement Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,883,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
SERP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Savings Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,248 |
|
|
|
733,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,883,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination of Employment
by Executive With Good
Reason |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Retirement Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Savings Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination of Employment
by Executive Without Good
Reason |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
714,833 |
|
Supplemental
Retirement Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,102,064 |
|
SERP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Deferred Comp Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,863 |
|
Director Retirement
Agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,238 |
|
Executive Savings Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,330 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,127,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination of Employment
by Bank Without Cause |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
1,237,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement
Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Savings Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,237,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,852 |
|
|
|
398,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Davies |
|
|
Petrovich |
|
|
Fritsch |
|
|
Glenn |
|
|
Pack |
|
|
Twiddy |
|
|
Gibson(2) |
|
Supplemental Retirement
Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
SERP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Savings Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,650 |
|
|
|
392,031 |
|
|
|
415,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,500 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Retirement
Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Savings Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,650 |
|
|
|
583,748 |
|
|
|
210,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The TARP compensation limitations prohibit the Company from making any payment to the
named executive officers for departure from the Company for any reason, or paying any benefit upon
a change-in-control, except for payments for services performed or benefits accrued. In addition,
the Company is prohibited, under section 18(k) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and 12 C.F.R.
Part 359, from making any severance or indemnification payments to its employees for so long as
Bank of Hampton Roads or the Company remain in troubled condition under applicable federal
regulations. Both of these limitations exclude payments due to an employee on death or disability.
Therefore, even though we have discussed above potential payments that would have been due had a
termination of an executive officer occurred as of December 31, 2009, it is likely that the
application of the TARP compensation limitations and/or 12 C.F.R. Part 359 would result in a
prohibition of all such payments, except to the extent previously accrued under generally accepted
accounting principles or due to death or disability, to a named executive officer if such officer
terminated employment during the TARP period or while the restrictions of 12 C.F.R. Part 359 apply. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Gibson terminated employment on May 18, 2009. This is the amount due to Mr. Gibson as of
December 31, 2009 under the terms of his Separation Agreement, Supplemental Retirement Agreement,
Executive Savings Plan and Director Deferred Compensation Plan subject to any restrictions on
payment imposed by Treasury. |
Director Compensation Table
The following table shows director compensation paid during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in Cash |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
Total |
|
Name |
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
Jack W. Gibson(1) |
|
|
14,400 |
|
|
|
28,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,850 |
|
Henry P. Custis |
|
|
25,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,150 |
|
Richard F. Hall, III(2) |
|
|
23,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,475 |
|
Douglas J. Glenn |
|
|
21,600 |
|
|
|
27,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,400 |
|
Scott C. Harvard(3) |
|
|
15,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,300 |
|
S-112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in Cash |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
Total |
|
Name |
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
Herman A. Hall, III(4) |
|
|
23,825 |
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,225 |
|
W. Lewis Witt |
|
|
26,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,475 |
|
Bobby L. Ralph(4) |
|
|
24,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,725 |
|
Emil A. Viola(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,350 |
|
Roland
Carroll Smith, Sr.(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,600 |
|
Robert R. Kinser(4) |
|
|
24,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,975 |
|
Jordan E. Slone |
|
|
23,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,700 |
|
William Brumsey, III(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,900 |
|
Robert Y. Green, Jr.(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,650 |
|
Billy G. Roughton |
|
|
41,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,300 |
|
Ollin B. Sykes (4) |
|
|
37,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,025 |
|
Frank T. Williams(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,100 |
|
Jerry T. Womack (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,525 |
|
D. Ben Berry(6) |
|
|
15,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,200 |
|
Pat Corbin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,900 |
|
Andy Davies |
|
|
11,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,850 |
|
William E. Paulette |
|
|
16,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,500 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Directorship ended on May 18, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Directorship ended on October 4, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
Directorship ended on August 24, 2009. |
|
(4) |
|
Directorship ended on September 30, 2010. |
|
(5) |
|
Directorship ended on September 21, 2009. |
|
(6) |
|
Directorship ended on April 14, 2009. |
During fiscal year 2009, each director of the Company received a directors fee of $850
per board meeting attended, $250 per committee meeting attended, and $100 per advisory board
meeting attended. The Company has a Directors Deferred Compensation Agreement through which
directors can elect to defer their directors fees by using the fees to purchase shares of our
stock held in a Rabbi Trust. The directors can also elect to defer their board fees, and we will
accrue interest on the deferred fees at an interest rate equal to the highest rate currently being
offered on a certificate of deposit at our bank subsidiaries.
S-113
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the Companys Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of the
Company during 2009. During 2009, none of our executive officers served as a member of a
compensation committee of another entity, nor did any of our executive officers serve as a director
of another entity whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee. There are members
of our Compensation Committee that have outstanding loans with Bank of Hampton Roads. Each of
these loans was made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including
interest rates, collateral, and repayment terms, as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with unrelated parties and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability
or present other unfavorable features. See Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
S-114
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
Our authorized capital stock consists of 1,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01
per share and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value. As
of November 10, 2010, there
were 684,680,995 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding held by 4,897 shareholders of
record. There were also 492 holders of outstanding Gateway common stock that was deemed by
operation of law to represent shares of Company Common Stock as of Gateways merger with and into
the Company on December 31, 2008, who collectively held 424,120 shares of such common stock as of
November 10, 2010. Holders of these shares are also deemed to be Eligible Shareholders for the
purposes of the Rights Offering. The issued shares of Common Stock represent non-withdrawable
capital, are not accounts of an insurable type, and are not federally insured.
Also on November 10, 2010, the following Common Stock purchase warrants were outstanding: a
warrant to purchase 7,846,852 shares of Commons Stock at $0.40 per share held by Carlyle, warrants
to purchase 23,540,556 shares of Common Stock at $0.40 per share held by Anchorage, and warrants to
purchase of 11,770,278 shares of Common Stock for $0.40 per share held by CapGen. In addition, the
Treasury holds a warrant to purchase 1,325,858 shares of Common Stock. We do not have any shares
of preferred stock issued or outstanding.
Common Stock
Voting Rights
Each holder of shares of Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share held on any matter
submitted to a vote of shareholders. There are no cumulative voting rights in the election of
directors.
Dividends
Holders of shares of Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by
the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for dividends. We are a corporation separate
and distinct from Bank of Hampton Roads and Shore Bank and the other subsidiaries. We pay
quarterly dividends out of assets legally available for distribution. On July 30, 2009, our Board
of Directors suspended cash dividends on our common shares indefinitely. Our ability to distribute
cash dividends in the future may be limited by regulatory restrictions and the need to maintain
sufficient consolidated capital.
No Preemptive or Conversion Rights
Holders of shares of our Common Stock do not have preemptive rights to purchase additional
shares of our Common Stock, and have no conversion or redemption rights.
Calls and Assessments
All of the issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock are non-assessable and
non-callable.
Liquidation Rights
In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of shares of our
Common Stock shall be entitled to receive, in cash or in kind, our assets available for
distribution remaining after payment or provision for payment of our debts and liabilities.
S-115
Amended TARP Warrant
The following is a brief description of the amended warrant that was issued to Treasury on
September 30, 2010 under the terms of the Exchange Agreement (the Amended TARP Warrant). This
description is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the Amended TARP Warrant, a
copy of which is attached as Exhibit 4.7 to this document.
Shares of Common Stock Subject to the Amended TARP Warrant
The Amended TARP Warrant is initially exercisable for 1,325,858 shares of our Common Stock.
Exercise of the Amended TARP Warrant
The initial exercise price applicable to the Amended TARP Warrant is $0.40 per share of Common
Stock for which the Amended TARP Warrant may be exercised. The Amended TARP Warrant may be
exercised at any time on or before September 29, 2020 by surrender of the Amended TARP Warrant and
a completed notice of exercise attached as an annex to the Amended TARP Warrant and the payment of
the exercise price for the shares of Common Stock for which the Amended TARP Warrant is being
exercised. The exercise price may be paid either by the withholding by the Company of such number
of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Amended TARP Warrant equal to the value of
the aggregate exercise price of the Amended TARP Warrant determined by reference to the market
price of our Common Stock on the trading day on which the Amended TARP Warrant is exercised or, if
agreed to by us and the Amended TARP Warrant holder, by the payment of cash equal to the aggregate
exercise price. The exercise price applicable to the Amended TARP Warrant is subject to the further
adjustments described below under the heading Adjustments to the Amended TARP Warrant.
Upon exercise of the Amended TARP Warrant, certificates for the shares of Common Stock
issuable upon exercise will be issued to the Amended TARP Warrant holder. We will not issue
fractional shares upon any exercise of the Amended TARP Warrant. Instead, the Amended TARP Warrant
holder will be entitled to a cash payment equal to the market price of our Common Stock on the last
day preceding the exercise of the Amended TARP Warrant (less the pro-rated exercise price of the
Amended TARP Warrant) for any fractional shares that would have otherwise been issuable upon
exercise of the Amended TARP Warrant. We will at all times reserve the aggregate number of shares
of our Common Stock for which the Amended TARP Warrant may be exercised. We will have listed the
shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Amended TARP Warrant with the NASDAQ Global
Select Market.
Rights as a Shareholder
The Amended TARP Warrant holder shall have no rights or privileges of the holders of our
Common Stock, including any voting rights, until (and then only to the extent) the Amended TARP
Warrant has been exercised.
Transferability and Assignability
The Amended TARP Warrant, and all rights under the Amended TARP Warrant, are transferable and
assignable.
Adjustments to the Amended TARP Warrant
S-116
Adjustments in Connection with Stock Splits, Subdivisions, Reclassifications and Combinations.
The number of shares for which the Amended TARP Warrant may be exercised and the exercise price
applicable to the Amended TARP Warrant will be proportionately adjusted in the event we pay stock
dividends or make distributions of our Common Stock, subdivide, combine or reclassify outstanding
shares of our Common Stock.
Anti-dilution Adjustment. Until the earlier of September 29, 2013, and the date the initial
selling security holder no longer holds the Amended TARP Warrant (and other than in certain
permitted transactions described below), if we issue any shares of Common Stock (or securities
convertible or exercisable into Common Stock) for less than the applicable warrant exercise price,
then the exercise price under the Amended TARP Warrant shall be adjusted to equal the consideration
per share of Common Stock received by the Company in connection with the Common Stock issuance, and
the number of shares of Common Stock into which the Amended TARP Warrant is exercisable and the
exercise price will be adjusted. Permitted transactions include issuances:
|
|
|
as consideration for or to fund the acquisition of businesses and/or
related assets at fair market value; |
|
|
|
|
in connection with employee benefit plans and compensation related
arrangements in the ordinary course and consistent with past practice
approved by our Board of Directors; |
|
|
|
|
in connection with public or broadly marketed offerings and sales of
Common Stock or convertible securities for cash conducted by us or our
affiliates in compliance with the registration requirements under the
Securities Act, or Rule 144A under the Securities Act on a basis
consistent with capital-raising transactions by comparable financial
institutions (but do not include other private transactions); and |
|
|
|
|
in connection with the exercise of preemptive rights on terms existing
as of the Amended TARP Warrant issue date. |
For the avoidance of doubt, the exercise price and the number of shares of Common Stock
issuable upon exercise of the Amended TARP Warrant shall not be subject to adjustment as a result
of the consummation of the Exchange Offers, the Investment, or the Rights Offering, provided the
purchase price in each such transaction is at a stated price per share of Common Stock equal to the
purchase price (as defined in the Exchange Agreement).
Other Distributions. If we declare any dividends or distributions other than our historical,
ordinary cash dividends, the exercise price of the Amended TARP Warrant will be adjusted to reflect
such distribution.
Certain Repurchases. If we affect a pro rata repurchase of Common Stock both the number of
shares issuable upon exercise of the Amended TARP Warrant and the exercise price will be adjusted.
Business Combinations. In the event of a merger, consolidation or similar transaction
involving the Company and requiring shareholder approval, the Amended TARP Warrant holders right
to receive shares of our Common Stock upon exercise of the Amended TARP Warrant shall be converted
into the right to exercise the Amended TARP Warrant for the consideration that would have been
payable to the Amended TARP Warrant holder with respect to the shares of Common Stock for which the
Amended TARP Warrant may be exercised, as if the Amended TARP Warrant had been exercised prior to
such merger, consolidation or similar transaction.
S-117
The Investor Warrants
The following is a brief description of the warrants issued to the Investors on September 30,
2010 in connection with their participation in the Private Placement pursuant to the terms of the
Investment Agreements. Two types of warrants were issued to certain of the Investors at closing
under the Private Placement. Each of Anchorage and CapGen were issued warrants exercisable at any
time after the closing of the Private Placement (the Standard Warrants). Anchorage, CapGen and
Carlyle were also issued warrants exercisable only upon the occurrence of certain events (the
Contingent Warrants, together with the Standard Warrants, the Investor Warrants). Except for
the differences noted below under -Exercise of the Warrants, the terms of the Standard Warrants
and the Contingent Warrants are the same in all material respects. This description is subject to
and qualified in its entirety by reference to the Investor Warrants, copies of which are attached
hereto as Exhibits 4.2 4.6.
Shares of Common Stock Subject to the Investor Warrants
The Investor Warrants are initially exercisable for shares of our Common Stock as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Investor Warrant |
|
Number of Shares |
Anchorage Standard Warrant |
|
|
15,693,704 |
|
Anchorage Contingent Warrant |
|
|
7,846,852 |
|
CapGen Standard Warrant |
|
|
7,846,852 |
|
CapGen Contingent Warrant |
|
|
3,923,426 |
|
Carlyle Contingent Warrant |
|
|
7,846,852 |
|
Exercise of the Investor Warrants
The initial exercise price applicable to the Investor Warrants is $0.40 per share of Common
Stock for which the Investor Warrants may be exercised.
The Standard Warrants may be exercised at any time on or before September 30, 2020 by
surrender of the applicable Standard Warrant and a completed notice of exercise attached as an
annex to the Standard Warrant and the payment of the exercise price for the shares of Common Stock
for which the Standard Warrant is being exercised.
The Contingent Warrants may be exercised only upon or after the earlier of:
1) the written stay of the Written Agreement, and
2) the occurrence of a Sale Event. A Sale Event includes:
|
a) |
|
a consolidation or merger of the Company with or into another
entity; |
|
|
b) |
|
any sale of all or substantially all of the Companys assets; |
|
|
c) |
|
the acquisition by any person (other than CapGen) of (i)
control of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, as such term is defined
by the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 or the Code of Virginia; |
S-118
|
d) |
|
the acquisition by any person (including CapGen) of shares
representing more than 50% of the outstanding Common Stock or more then 50% of
the ordinary voting power represented by other outstanding voting securities
of the Company; |
|
|
e) |
|
any reclassification or exchange of outstanding shares of
Common Stock into or for securities other than Common Stock; |
|
|
f) |
|
the approval of any plan of liquidation or dissolution of the
Company; or |
|
|
g) |
|
the replacement of a majority of the Board of Directors over
a two year period from the current Board of Directors, where such replacement
has not been approved by the current Board of Directors or where such new
directors are not replacing a prior designee of Anchorage, Carlyle or CapGen. |
After the written stay of the Written Agreement or occurrence of any Sale Event, the
Contingent Warrants may be exercised on or before September 30, 2020 by surrender of the applicable
Contingent Warrant and a completed notice of exercise attached as an annex to the Contingent
Warrant and the payment of the exercise price for the shares of Common Stock for which the
Contingent Warrant is being exercised.
The exercise price of the Investor Warrants may be paid either by the withholding by the
Company of such number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of any Investor Warrant
equal to the value of the aggregate exercise price of the Investor Warrant determined by reference
to the market price of our Common Stock on the trading day on which the Investor Warrant is
exercised or, if agreed to by the Company and the Investor Warrant holder, by the payment of cash
equal to the aggregate exercise price. The exercise price applicable to the Investor Warrants is
subject to the further adjustments described below under the heading Adjustments to the Investor
Warrants.
Upon exercise of any Investor Warrant, certificates for the shares of Common Stock issuable
upon exercise will be issued to the Investor Warrant holder. We will not issue fractional shares
upon any exercise of the Investor Warrants. Instead, the Investor Warrant holder will be entitled
to a cash payment equal to the market price of our Common Stock on the last day preceding the
exercise of the Investor Warrant (less the pro-rated exercise price of the Investor Warrant) for
any fractional shares that would have otherwise been issuable upon exercise of any Investor
Warrant. We will at all times reserve the aggregate number of shares of our Common Stock for which
the Investor Warrants may be exercised. We have listed the shares of Common Stock issuable upon
exercise of the Investor Warrants with the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
Rights as a Shareholder
The holders of the Investor Warrants shall have no rights or privileges of the holders of our
Common Stock, including any voting rights, until (and then only to the extent) the Investor
Warrants have been exercised.
Transferability and Assignability
The Investor Warrants, and all rights under the Investor Warrants, are transferable and
assignable.
Adjustments to the Investor Warrants
S-119
Adjustments in Connection with Stock Splits, Subdivisions, Reclassifications and Combinations.
The number of shares for which the Investor Warrants may be exercised and the exercise price
applicable to the Investor Warrants will be proportionately adjusted in the event we pay stock
dividends or make distributions of our Common Stock, subdivide, combine or reclassify outstanding
shares of our Common Stock.
Anti-dilution Adjustment. Other than in certain Permitted Transactions (as defined below), if
we issue any shares of Common Stock (or securities convertible or exercisable into Common Stock)
for less the then applicable warrant exercise price, then the exercise price under the Investor
Warrants shall be adjusted to equal the consideration per share of Common Stock received by the
Company in connection with the Common Stock issuance, and the number of shares of Common Stock into
which the Investor Warrants are exercisable and the exercise price will be adjusted. Permitted
Transactions shall include issuances:
|
|
|
as consideration for or to fund the acquisition of businesses and/or
related assets at fair market value; |
|
|
|
|
in connection with employee benefit plans and compensation related
arrangements in the ordinary course and consistent with past practice
approved by our Board of Directors; |
|
|
|
|
in connection with public or broadly marketed offerings and sales of
Common Stock or convertible securities for cash conducted by us or our
affiliates pursuant to registration under the Securities Act, or Rule
144A thereunder on a basis consistent with capital-raising
transactions by comparable financial institutions (but do not include
other private transactions); and |
|
|
|
|
in connection with the exercise of preemptive rights on terms existing
as of September 30, 2010. |
Other Distributions. If we declare any dividends or distributions other than our historical,
ordinary cash dividends, both the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Investor Warrants
and the exercise price will be adjusted to reflect such distribution.
Certain Repurchases. If we affect a pro rata repurchase of Common Stock both the number of
shares issuable upon exercise of the Investor Warrants and the exercise price will be adjusted.
Business Combinations. In the event of a merger, consolidation or similar transaction
involving the Company and requiring shareholder approval, the right of any Investor Warrant holder
to receive shares of our Common Stock upon exercise of the Investor Warrants shall be converted
into the right to exercise the Investor Warrants for the consideration that would have been payable
to the Investor Warrant holders with respect to the shares of Common Stock for which the Investor
Warrants may be exercised, as if the Investor Warrants had been exercised immediately prior to such
merger, consolidation or similar transaction.
Preferred Stock
Our Board of Directors is empowered to authorize the issuance, in one or more series, of
shares of preferred stock at such times, for such purposes and for such consideration as it may
deem advisable without shareholder approval. Our board is also authorized to fix the designations,
voting, conversion, preference and other relative rights, qualifications and limitations of any
such series of preferred stock.
Our Board of Directors, without shareholder approval, may authorize the issuance of one or
more series of preferred stock with voting and conversion rights which could adversely affect the
voting power
of the holders of our Common Stock and, under certain circumstances, discourage an attempt by
others to gain control of us.
S-120
The creation and issuance of any series of preferred stock, and the relative rights,
designations and preferences of such series, if and when established, will depend upon, among other
things, our future capital needs, then existing market conditions and other factors that, in the
judgment of the our board, might warrant the issuance of preferred stock.
Certain Provisions of the Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and Virginia Law
General
Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws contain provisions that could make more difficult an
acquisition of us by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions are
expected to discourage specific types of coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids
as well as to encourage persons seeking to acquire control to first negotiate with us. Although
these provisions may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change-in-control, we
believe that the benefits of increased protection through the potential ability to negotiate with
the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure the Company
outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging these proposals because, among other things, negotiation
of such proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Classified Board of Directors
Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws divide the Board of Directors into three classes of
directors serving staggered three-year terms. As a result, approximately one-third of the Board of
Directors will be elected at each annual meeting of shareholders. The classification of directors,
together with the provisions in the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws described below that limit
the ability of shareholders to remove directors and that permit the remaining directors to fill any
vacancies on the Board of Directors, will have the effect of making it more difficult for
shareholders to change the composition of the Board of Directors. As a result, at least two annual
meetings of shareholders may be required for the shareholders to change a majority of the
directors, whether or not a change in the Board of Directors would be beneficial and whether or not
a majority of shareholders believe that such a change would be desirable.
Increasing the Number of Directors
Under Virginia law, the articles of incorporation or bylaws may establish a variable range for
the size of the Board of Directors by fixing a minimum and maximum number of directors. If a
variable range is established, the number of directors may be fixed or changed from time to time,
within the minimum and maximum, by the shareholders or by the Board of Directors. Our Articles of
Incorporation require that our Board of Directors consist of not less than eight nor more than 24
persons.
Action of Shareholders by Written Consent
Under Virginia law, the Articles of Incorporation may provide that any action required to be
adopted or taken at a shareholders meeting may be adopted or taken without a meeting, and without
prior notice, if consents in writing setting forth the action so adopted or taken are signed, by
the holders of outstanding shares having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be
required to adopt or take the action at a meeting. Our Articles of Incorporation do not provide for
such action and our Bylaws specifically provide that any action which may be taken at a meeting of
the shareholders may only be
taken without a meeting if one or more consents, in writing, setting forth the action so
taken, is signed by all of the shareholders entitled to vote with respect to the subject matter
thereof. Therefore, any action of the shareholders by written consent requires the action of all
shareholders entitled to vote.
S-121
Inability of Shareholders to Call Special Meetings
Our Bylaws provide that special meetings of shareholders may be called only by our president
or CEO, the chairman of our Board of Directors or the Board of Directors. As a result, shareholders
are not able to act on matters other than at annual shareholders meetings unless they are able to
persuade the president, the chairman or a majority of the Board of Directors to call a special
meeting.
Advance Notification Requirements
Our Bylaws also require a shareholder who desires to nominate a candidate for election to the
Board of Directors at an annual shareholders meeting to provide us advance notice of at least 45
days before the date the proxy statement for the last annual meeting was first mailed.
Affiliated Transactions
The Virginia Stock Corporation Act contains provisions governing Affiliated Transactions.
Affiliated Transactions include certain mergers and share exchanges, material dispositions of
corporate assets not in the ordinary course of business, any dissolution of the corporation
proposed by or on behalf of an Interested Shareholder (as defined below), or reclassifications,
including reverse stock splits, recapitalizations or mergers of the corporation with its
subsidiaries which have the effect of increasing the percentage of voting shares beneficially owned
by an Interested Shareholder by more than 5%. For purposes of the Virginia Stock Corporation Act,
an Interested Shareholder is defined as any beneficial owner of more than 10% of any class of the
voting securities of a Virginia corporation.
Subject to certain exceptions discussed below, the provisions governing Affiliated
Transactions require that, for three years following the date upon which any shareholder becomes an
Interested Shareholder, a Virginia corporation cannot engage in an Affiliated Transaction with such
Interested Shareholder unless approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the
voting shares of the corporation, other than the shares beneficially owned by the Interested
Shareholder, and by a majority (but not less than two) of the Disinterested Directors. A
Disinterested Director means, with respect to a particular Interested Shareholder, a member of a
corporations Board of Directors who (i) was a member before the later of January 1, 1988 and the
date on which an Interested Shareholder became an Interested Shareholder and (ii) was recommended
for election by, or was elected to fill a vacancy and received the affirmative vote of, a majority
of the Disinterested Directors then on the board. At the expiration of the three-year period, these
provisions require approval of Affiliated Transactions by the affirmative vote of the holders of
two-thirds of the voting shares of the corporation, other than those beneficially owned by the
Interested Shareholder.
The principal exceptions to the special voting requirement apply to Affiliated Transactions
occurring after the three-year period has expired and require either that the transaction be
approved by a majority of the Disinterested Directors or that the transaction satisfy certain fair
price requirements of the statute. In general, the fair price requirements provide that the
shareholders must receive the highest per share price for their shares as was paid by the
Interested Shareholder for his shares or the fair market value of their shares, whichever is
higher. They also require that, during the three years preceding the announcement of the proposed
Affiliated Transaction, all required dividends have been paid and no special financial
accommodations have been accorded the Interested Shareholder unless approved by a majority of the
Disinterested Directors.
S-122
None of the foregoing limitations and special voting requirements apply to an Affiliated
Transaction with an Interested Shareholder whose acquisition of shares making such person an
Interested Shareholder was approved by a majority of the corporations Disinterested Directors.
These provisions were designed to deter certain takeovers of Virginia corporations. In
addition, the statute provides that, by affirmative vote of a majority of the voting shares other
than shares owned by any Interested Shareholder, a corporation may adopt, by meeting certain voting
requirements, an amendment to its articles of incorporation or bylaws providing that the Affiliated
Transactions provisions shall not apply to the corporation. The Company has not adopted such an
amendment. The Company has determined that none of the transactions contemplated by Private
Placement, Rights Offering, TARP Exchange and TARP Conversion are subject to the terms of the
Affiliated Transactions provisions. Nevertheless, the Board has approved and authorized the
foregoing transactions to the extent that the Affiliated Transactions provisions may apply.
Control Share Acquisitions
The Virginia Stock Corporation Act also contains provisions regulating certain control share
acquisitions, which are transactions causing the voting strength of any person acquiring
beneficial ownership of shares of a public corporation in Virginia to meet or exceed certain
threshold percentages (20%, 33 1/3% or 50%) of the total votes entitled to be cast for
the election of directors. Shares acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights
unless: (i) the voting rights are granted by a majority vote of all outstanding shares other than
those held by the acquiring person or any officer or employee director of the corporation, or (ii)
the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation provide that these Virginia law
provisions do not apply to acquisitions of its shares. The acquiring person may require that a
special meeting of the shareholders be held to consider the grant of voting rights to the shares
acquired in the control share acquisition. These provisions were designed to deter certain
takeovers of Virginia public corporations. The Company has determined that none of the
transactions contemplated by Private Placement, Rights Offering, TARP Exchange and TARP Conversion
are subject to the terms of the control share acquisition statutes of the Virginia Stock
Corporation Act. Nevertheless, the Board has approved and authorized the foregoing transactions to
the extent that any of the control share acquisition statutes may apply.
Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
Article 10 of Chapter 9 of Title 13.1 of the Virginia Stock Corporation Act permits a Virginia
corporation to indemnify any director or officer for reasonable expenses incurred in any legal
proceeding in advance of final disposition of the proceeding, if the director or officer furnishes
the corporation a written statement of his good faith belief that he has met the standard of
conduct prescribed by the Virginia Stock Corporation Act and a determination is made by the board
of directors that such standard has been met. In a proceeding by or in the right of the
corporation, no indemnification shall be made in respect of any matter as to which an officer or
director is adjudged to be liable to the corporation, unless the court in which the proceeding took
place determines that, despite such liability, such person is reasonably entitled to
indemnification in view of all the relevant circumstances. In any other proceeding, no
indemnification shall be made if the director or officer is adjudged liable to the corporation on
the basis that personal benefit was improperly received by him. Corporations are given the power to
make any other or further indemnity, including advancement of expenses, to any director or officer
that may be authorized by the articles of incorporation or any bylaw made by the shareholders, or
any resolution adopted, before or after the event, by the shareholders, except an indemnity against
willful misconduct or a knowing violation of the criminal law. Unless limited by its articles of
incorporation, indemnification of
a director or officer is mandatory when he entirely prevails in the defense of any proceeding
to which he is a party because he is or was a director or officer.
S-123
The Bylaws of the Company contain provisions indemnifying the directors and officers of the
Company to the full extent permitted by Virginia law. In addition, the Articles of Incorporation of
the Company eliminate the personal liability of its Registrants directors and officers to the
Company or its shareholders for monetary damages to the full extent permitted by Virginia law.
The foregoing is a summary of certain aspects of Virginia law and the Companys Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws dealing with indemnification of directors and officers. It is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the detailed provisions of Article 10 of Chapter 9 of Title 13.1 of
the Virginia Stock Corporation Act and the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Company.
THE RIGHTS OFFERING
Subscription Rights
We are distributing, at no charge, to holders of our Common Stock, non-transferable
subscription rights to purchase up to 100,000,000 shares of our Common Stock at a price of $0.40
per share in the Rights Offering. Each subscription right consists of a Basic Subscription Right
and an over-subscription privilege. You will receive one subscription right for each share of
Common Stock held by you of record as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 29, 2010.
Basic Subscription Rights
The Basic Subscription Right gives you the right to purchase 2.2698
shares of new Common Stock for each
existing share of Common Stock owned on the Record Date at a subscription price of $0.40 per share. You may
exercise all or a portion of your subscription rights, or you may choose not to exercise any of
your subscription rights. If you do not exercise your Basic Subscription Rights in full, you will
not be entitled to purchase any shares of Common Stock pursuant to your over-subscription
privilege.
Over-Subscription Privilege
If you purchase all of the shares available to you pursuant to your Basic Subscription Rights,
you may also choose to purchase a portion of any shares that other shareholders do not purchase by
exercising their Basic Subscription Rights, provided that (i) no Eligible Shareholder shall thereby
exceed, together with any other person with whom such shareholder may be aggregated under
applicable law, 4.9% beneficial ownership of the Companys equity securities and (ii) the aggregate
purchase price of all Common Stock purchased in the Rights Offering shall not exceed $40 million.
If sufficient shares are available for offer pursuant to the Rights Offering, we will seek to honor
the over-subscription requests in full, subject to the foregoing limitations. If over-subscription
requests exceed the number of shares available, however, we will allocate the available shares pro
rata among the shareholders exercising the over-subscription privilege in proportion to the number
of shares of our Common Stock each of those shareholders owned on the Record Date, relative to the
number of shares owned on the Record Date by all shareholders exercising the over-subscription
privilege. If this pro rata allocation results in any shareholder receiving a greater number of
shares than the shareholder subscribed for pursuant to the exercise of the over-subscription
privilege, then such shareholder will be allocated only that number of shares for which the
shareholder oversubscribed, and the remaining shares will be allocated among all other shareholders
exercising the over-subscription privilege on the same pro rata basis described above. The
proration process will be repeated until all shares have been allocated.
S-124
Registrar and Transfer Company, our subscription agent for the Rights Offering, will determine
the over-subscription allocation based on the formula described above.
To properly exercise your over-subscription privilege, you must deliver the subscription
payment related to your over-subscription privilege before the Rights Offering expires. Because we
will not know the total number of unsubscribed shares before the Rights Offering expires, if you
wish to maximize the number of shares you purchase pursuant to your over-subscription privilege,
you will need to deliver payment in an amount equal to the aggregate subscription price for the
maximum number of shares that you have requested to purchase (i.e., assuming you exercise all of
your Basic Subscription Rights and are allotted the full amount of your over-subscription without
reduction).
We can provide no assurances that you will actually be permitted to purchase the number of
shares issuable upon the exercise of your over-subscription privilege in full at the expiration of
the Rights Offering. We will not be able to satisfy any orders for shares pursuant to the
over-subscription privilege if all of our shareholders exercise their Basic Subscription Rights in
full, and we will only honor an over-subscription privilege to the extent sufficient shares are
available following the exercise of Basic Subscription Rights, subject to the pro rata allocation
described above.
To the extent the aggregate subscription price of the actual number of unsubscribed shares
allocated to you pursuant to the over-subscription privilege is less than the amount you actually
paid, the excess subscription payments will be returned to you, without interest or penalty, as
soon as practicable.
To the extent the amount you actually paid in connection with the exercise of the
over-subscription privilege is less than the aggregate subscription price of the unsubscribed
shares allocated to you, you will receive only the number of unsubscribed shares for which you
actually paid.
Fractional shares will be eliminated by rounding down to the nearest whole share.
We will deliver certificates representing shares or credit the account of your record holder
with shares of our Common Stock that you purchased with the over-subscription privilege as soon as
practicable after the expiration of the Rights Offering.
Method of Exercising Subscription Rights
The exercise of subscription rights is irrevocable and may not be cancelled or modified. You
may exercise your subscription rights as follows:
Subscription by Registered Holders
If you hold a Common Stock certificate, the number of shares you may purchase pursuant to your
Basic Subscription Rights is indicated on the enclosed rights certificate. You may exercise your
subscription rights by properly completing and executing the rights certificate and forwarding it,
together with your full payment, to the subscription agent at the address given below under
Subscription Agent, to be received before 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on December 10 , 2010.
S-125
Subscription by Beneficial Owners
If you are a beneficial owner of shares of our Common Stock that are registered in the name of
a broker, dealer, custodian bank or other nominee, you will not receive a rights certificate.
Instead, the Company will issue one subscription right to the nominee record holder for each share
of our Common Stock that you own at the Record Date. If you are not contacted by your nominee, you
should promptly contact your nominee in order to subscribe for shares in the Rights Offering and
follow the instructions provided by your nominee.
Payment Method
As described in the instructions accompanying the rights certificate, payments submitted to
the subscription agent must be made in U.S. currency, by one of the following two methods:
|
|
by an uncertified check drawn upon a U.S. bank payable to Registrar and Transfer Company
as rights offering agent for Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., or |
|
|
|
by wire transfer of immediately available funds to, the account maintained by the
Subscription Agent for purposes of accepting subscriptions in the Rights at the following
account: ABA No. 031-201-360, further credit to Account No. 276-053-5977 at TD
Bank, 6000 Atrium Way, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, 08054, with an account name of Registrar
and Transfer Company as rights offering agent for Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Any wire
transfer should clearly indicate the identity of the subscriber who is paying the Subscription
Price by wire transfer. |
Payments will be deemed to have been received upon (i) clearance of any uncertified check, or
(ii) receipt of collected funds in the Subscription Account designated above. If paying by
uncertified check, please note that the funds paid thereby may take five or more business days to
clear. Accordingly, Rights holders who wish to pay the subscription price by means of uncertified
check are urged to make payment sufficiently in advance of the expiration time to ensure that such
payment is received and clears by such date.
You should read the instruction letter accompanying the rights certificate carefully and
strictly follow it. DO NOT SEND RIGHTS CERTIFICATES OR PAYMENTS DIRECTLY TO US. We will not
consider your subscription received until the subscription agent has received delivery of a
properly completed and duly executed rights certificate and payment of the full subscription
amount. The risk of delivery of all documents and payments is borne by you or your nominee, not by
the subscription agent or us.
The method of delivery of rights certificates and payment of the subscription amount to the
subscription agent will be at the risk of the holders of subscription rights. If sent by mail, we
recommend that you send those certificates and payments by registered mail, properly insured, with
return receipt requested, and that you allow a sufficient number of days to ensure delivery to the
subscription agent and clearance of payment before the Rights Offering expires.
Missing or Incomplete Subscription Forms or Payment
If you fail to complete and sign the required subscription forms or otherwise fail to follow
the subscription procedures that apply to the exercise of your subscription rights before the
Rights Offering expires, the subscription agent will reject your subscription or accept it only to
the extent of the payment received. Neither we nor our subscription agent undertakes any
responsibility or action to contact you concerning an incomplete or incorrect subscription form,
nor are we under any obligation to correct such forms. We have the sole discretion to determine
whether a subscription exercise properly complies with the subscription procedures.
S-126
If you send a payment that is insufficient to purchase the number of shares you requested, or
if the number of shares you requested is not specified in the forms, the payment received will be
applied to exercise your subscription rights to the fullest extent possible based on the amount of
the payment received, subject to the availability of shares under the over-subscription privilege
and the elimination of fractional shares. Any excess subscription payments received by the
subscription agent will be returned, without interest or penalty, as soon as practicable following
the expiration of the Rights Offering.
Expiration Date
The subscription period, during which you may exercise your subscription rights, expires at
5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on, December 10, 2010, which is the expiration of the Rights Offering. If
you do not exercise your subscription rights before that time, your subscription rights will expire
and will no longer be exercisable. We will not be required to issue shares to you if the
subscription agent receives your rights certificate or your subscription payment after that time.
We have the option to extend the Rights Offering, although we do not currently intend to do so. We
may extend the Rights Offering by giving oral or written notice to the subscription agent before
the Rights Offering expires. If we elect to extend the Rights Offering, we will issue a press
release announcing the extension no later than 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on the next business day
after the most recently announced expiration date.
If you hold your shares of Common Stock in the name of a broker, dealer, custodian bank or
other nominee, the nominee will exercise the subscription rights on your behalf in accordance with
your instructions. Please note that the nominee may establish a deadline before the 5:00 p.m.,
Eastern Time on December 10, 2010, expiration date that we have established for the Rights
Offering.
Subscription Agent
The subscription agent for this offering is Registrar and Transfer Company. The rights
certificate and payment of the subscription price must be delivered to the Subscription Agent by
one of the methods described below:
By Mail, Hand or Overnight Courier:
Registrar and Transfer Company
10 Commerce Drive Cranford, NJ 07016
Attn. Reorg/Exchange Department
Telephone Number for Confirmation:
(800) 368-5948 (toll free)
Telephone Number for Information:
(800) 368-5948 (toll free)
Email Address for Information:
info@rtco.com
If sent by mail, we recommend that you send documents and payments by registered mail,
properly insured, with return receipt requested, and that you allow a sufficient number of days to
ensure delivery to the subscription agent and clearance or payment before the Rights Offering
expires. Do not send or deliver these materials to us.
If you deliver subscription documents or rights certificates in a manner different than that
described in this Prospectus, we may not honor the exercise of your subscription rights.
S-127
Information Agent
The Companys information agent for the Rights Offering is Douglas J. Glenn, Executive Vice
President, General Counsel, and Chief Operating Officer at Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., 999
Waterside Dr., Suite 200, Norfolk, Virginia 23510. If you have any questions about the Company or
regarding the Rights Offering, completing a rights certificate or submitting payment in the Rights
Offering, please contact at him at (757) 217-3634.
No Fractional Shares
All shares will be sold at a purchase price of $0.40 per share. We will not issue fractional
shares. Fractional shares resulting from the exercise of the Basic Subscription Rights and the
over-subscription privileges will be eliminated by rounding down to the nearest whole shares.
Notice to Nominees
If you are a broker, custodian bank or other nominee holder that holds shares of our Common
Stock for the account of others on the Record Date, you should notify the beneficial owners of the
shares for whom you are the nominee of the Rights Offering as soon as possible to learn their
intentions with respect to exercising their subscription rights. You should obtain instructions
from the beneficial owners of our Common Stock. If a beneficial owner of our Common Stock so
instructs, you should complete the rights certificate and submit it to the subscription agent with
the proper subscription payment by the expiration date. You may exercise the number of subscription
rights to which all beneficial owners in the aggregate otherwise would have been entitled had they
been direct holders of our Common Stock on the Record Date, provided that you, as a nominee record
holder, make a proper showing to the subscription agent by submitting the form entitled Nominee
Holder Certification, which is provided with your Rights Offering materials. If you did not
receive this form, you should contact the companys information agent to request a copy.
Beneficial Owners
If you are a beneficial owner of shares of our Common Stock and will receive your subscription
rights through a broker, custodian bank or other nominee, we will ask your nominee to notify you of
the Rights Offering. If you wish to exercise your subscription rights, you will need to have your
nominee act for you, as described above. To indicate your decision with respect to your
subscription rights, you should follow the instructions of your nominee. If you wish instead to
obtain a separate rights certificate, you should contact your nominee as soon as possible and
request that a rights certificate be issued to you. You should contact your nominee if you do not
receive notice of the Rights Offering, but you believe you are entitled to participate in the
Rights Offering. We are not responsible if you do not receive the notice by mail or otherwise from
your nominee or if you receive notice without sufficient time to respond to your nominee by the
deadline established by your nominee, which may be before the 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, December 10,
2010, the expiration date.
Non-Transferability of Subscription Rights
The subscription rights granted to you are non-transferable and, therefore, you may not
sell, transfer or assign your subscription rights to anyone. The subscription rights will not be
listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market or any other stock exchange or market. The
shares of our Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the subscription rights will be listed on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market.
S-128
Validity of Subscriptions
We will resolve all questions regarding the validity and form of the exercise of your
subscription rights, including time of receipt and eligibility to participate in the Rights
Offering. Our determination will be final and binding. Once made, subscriptions and directions are
irrevocable, and we will not accept any alternative, conditional or contingent subscriptions or
directions. We reserve the absolute right to reject any subscriptions or directions not properly
submitted or the acceptance of which would be unlawful. You must resolve any irregularities in
connection with your subscriptions before the subscription period expires, unless we waive them in
our sole discretion. Neither we nor the subscription agent is under any duty to notify you or your
representative of defects in your subscriptions. A subscription will be considered accepted,
subject to our right to withdraw or cancel the Rights Offering, only when the subscription agent
receives a properly completed and duly executed rights certificate and any other required documents
and the full subscription payment including final clearance of any uncertified check. Our
interpretations of the terms and conditions of the Rights Offering will be final and binding.
Shareholder Rights
You will have no rights as a holder of the shares of our Common Stock you purchase in the
Rights Offering until certificates representing the shares of our Common Stock are issued to you,
or your account at your nominee is credited with the shares of our Common Stock purchased in the
Rights Offering.
No Revocation or Change
Once you submit the rights certificate or have instructed your nominee of your subscription
request, you are not allowed to revoke or change the exercise or request a refund of monies paid.
All exercises of subscription rights are irrevocable, even if you learn information about us that
you consider to be unfavorable. You should not exercise your subscription rights unless you are
certain that you wish to purchase shares at the subscription price.
Fees and Expenses
We will pay all fees charged by the subscription agent. You are responsible for paying any
other commissions, fees, taxes or other expenses incurred in connection with the exercise of the
subscription rights.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of Rights Distribution
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, you should not recognize income or loss upon receipt or
exercise of these subscription rights to purchase our shares for the reasons described below in
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.
No Recommendation to Rights Holders
Our board of directors is not making a recommendation regarding your exercise of the
subscription rights. Shareholders who exercise subscription rights risk investment loss on money
invested. The market price for our Common Stock may decline to a price that is less than the
subscription price and, if you purchase shares at the subscription price, you may not be able to
sell the shares in the future at the same price or a higher price. You should make your decision
based on your assessment of
our business and financial condition, our prospects for the future and the terms of this
Rights Offering. Please see Risk Factors for a discussion of some of the risks involved in
investing in our Common Stock.
S-129
Backstop Commitment
Subject to certain conditions contained in the Investment Agreements, the Investors have
agreed to purchase from us, at $0.40 per share, all of the shares of Common Stock offered pursuant
to the Rights Offering that are not purchased by Eligible Shareholders. For additional details,
see Questions and Answers Related to the Offering How does the backstop commitment work?
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE CIRCULAR 230, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY
DISCUSSION OF TAX MATTERS DISCUSSED IN THIS PROSPECTUS WAS WRITTEN IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROMOTION
OR MARKETING OF THE TRANSACTIONS OR MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN AND WAS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE
USED, AND CANNOT BE USED BY YOU, FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING TAX-RELATED PENALTIES UNDER FEDERAL,
STATE OR LOCAL TAX LAW. WE RECOMMEND THAT YOU CONSULT YOUR OWN TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE FEDERAL,
STATE, LOCAL, AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF PARTICIPATING IN THE RIGHTS OFFERING.
The following discussion is a summary of certain United States federal income tax consequences
to U.S. holders (as defined below) of the receipt and ownership of the subscription rights acquired
in the Rights Offering and the ownership of shares of Common Stock received upon exercise of the
subscription rights or, if applicable, upon exercise of the over-subscription privilege.
You are a U.S. holder if you are a beneficial owner of subscription rights or shares of Common Stock and you are:
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
|
a corporation (or any other entity treated as a corporation for United States federal income
tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof
or the District of Columbia; |
|
|
|
|
an estate whose income is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of its source; or |
|
|
|
|
a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and
one or more United States persons, as defined in the Code, have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Department
regulations to be treated as a United States person. |
The following discussion is based upon the provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), regulations promulgated by the Treasury Department thereunder, and
administrative rulings and judicial decisions, in each case as of the date hereof. These
authorities are subject to differing interpretations and may be changed, perhaps retroactively,
resulting in United States federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below. We
have not sought any ruling from the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) with respect to
the statements made and the conclusions reached in this discussion, and there can be no assurance
that the IRS will agree with such statements and conclusions. This discussion applies only to U.S.
holders who acquire the subscription rights in the Rights Offering. Further, this discussion
assumes that the subscription rights or shares of Common Stock issued upon exercise of the
subscription rights or, if applicable, the over-subscription privilege will be held as capital
assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. In addition, this summary does not address
all tax considerations that may be applicable to your particular circumstances or to you if you are
a U.S. holder that may be subject to special tax rules, including, without limitation:
|
|
|
banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions; |
|
|
|
|
regulated investment companies; |
|
|
|
|
real estate investment trusts; |
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or commodities; |
|
|
|
|
traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for
securities holdings; |
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations; |
|
|
|
|
persons liable for alternative minimum tax; |
|
|
|
|
persons that hold shares of Common Stock as part of a straddle or a hedging or
conversion transaction; |
|
|
|
|
partnerships or other entities treated as partnerships for United States federal income
tax purposes; or |
|
|
|
|
persons whose functional currency is not the United States dollar. |
S-130
If a partnership (including any entity treated as a partnership for United States federal
income tax purposes) receives the subscription rights or holds shares of Common Stock received upon
exercise of the subscription rights or the over-subscription privilege, the tax treatment of a
partner in a partnership generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of
the partnership. Such a partner or partnership should consult its own tax advisor as to the United
States federal income tax consequences of the receipt and ownership of the subscription rights or
the ownership of shares of Common Stock received upon exercise of the subscription rights or, if
applicable, upon exercise of the over-subscription privilege.
This discussion addresses only certain aspects of United States federal income taxation. You
should consult your own tax advisor regarding the United States federal, state, local, non-U.S. and
other tax consequences of the receipt and ownership of the subscription rights acquired in the
Rights Offering and the ownership of shares of Common Stock received upon exercise of the
subscription rights or, if applicable, upon exercise of the over subscription privilege.
Taxation of Subscription Rights
Receipt of Subscription Rights
Your receipt of subscription rights in the Rights Offering should be treated as a nontaxable
distribution for United States federal income tax purposes. The discussion below assumes that the
receipt of subscription rights will be treated as a nontaxable distribution.
Tax Basis and Holding Period of Subscription Rights
Your tax basis of the subscription rights for United States federal income tax purposes will
depend on the fair market value of the subscription rights you receive and the fair market value of
your existing shares of Common Stock on the date you receive the subscription rights.
If the fair market value of the subscription rights you receive is 15% or more of the fair
market value of your existing shares of Common Stock on the date you receive the subscription
rights, then you must allocate the tax basis of your existing shares of Common Stock between the
existing shares of Common Stock and the subscription rights you receive in proportion to their
respective fair market values determined on the date you receive the subscription rights.
|
|
|
If the fair market value of the subscription rights you receive is less than 15% of the
fair market value of your existing shares of Common Stock on the date you receive the
subscription rights, the subscription rights will be allocated a zero tax basis, unless you
elect to allocate the tax basis
of your existing shares of Common Stock between the existing shares of Common Stock and the
subscription rights you receive in proportion to their respective fair market values
determined on the date you receive the subscription rights. If you choose to allocate the
tax basis between your existing shares of Common Stock and the subscription rights, you must
make this election on a statement included with your United States federal income tax return
for the taxable year in which you receive the subscription rights. Such an election is
irrevocable. |
S-131
|
|
|
The fair market value of the subscription rights on the date the subscription rights are
distributed is uncertain, and we have not obtained, and do not intend to obtain, an
appraisal of the fair market value of the subscription rights on that date. In determining
the fair market value of the subscription rights, you should consider all relevant facts
and circumstances, including any difference between the subscription price of the
subscription rights and the trading price of our Common Stock on the date that the
subscription rights are distributed, the length of the period during which the subscription
rights may be exercised and the fact that the subscription rights are non-transferable. |
Your holding period of the subscription rights will include your holding period of the shares
of Common Stock with respect to which the subscription rights were distributed.
Exercise of Subscription Rights
You generally will not recognize gain or loss upon exercise of the subscription rights. The
tax basis of the shares of Common Stock you receive upon exercise of the subscription rights or, if
applicable, upon exercise of the over-subscription privilege generally will equal the sum of (i)
the subscription price and (ii) the tax basis, if any, of the subscription rights as determined
above. Your holding period of the shares of Common Stock you receive upon exercise of the
subscription rights or, if applicable, upon exercise of the over-subscription privilege will begin
on the date the subscriptions rights are exercised.
Expiration of Subscription Rights
If you do not exercise the subscription rights, you should not recognize a capital loss for
United States federal income tax purposes and any portion of the tax basis of your existing shares
of Common Stock previously allocated to the subscription rights not exercised will be re-allocated
to the existing Common Stock.
S-132
Receipt of Subscription Rights as a Beneficial Owner of Common Stock in a Qualified Plan or
Nonqualified Plan
Participants in certain of the Companys qualified and nonqualified deferred compensation
plans who have directed the investment of some of their account
balances in Common Stock may have
the opportunity to participate in this Rights Offering by directing the Company or their plan
trustees to exercise the Rights on their behalf.
The Companys qualified plans which offer investments in Common Stock are the VBA Defined
Contribution Plan for Bank of Hampton Roads and the Gateway Bank & Trust Company Employees Savings
and Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (the Qualified Plans). The Companys nonqualified plans which
offer investments in Common Stock are the Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Executive Savings Plan,
the Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, and
the Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. 2008 Director Deferred Compensation Plan (the Nonqualified
Plans).
If you are a participant in a Qualified or Nonqualified Plan, there are no income tax
consequences to you upon the issuance of the Rights, the exercise of the Rights
or the purchase of Common Shares by the Qualified and Nonqualified
Plans. The following discussion covers the tax consequences of
distribution of shares of Common Stock purchased in the Rights
Offering from the Qualified or Nonqualified Plans.
Qualified Plans: Upon a lump sum distribution of the Common Stock from the Qualified Plans,
you may defer the income tax on the excess of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date
of distribution over the basis of the Common Stock to the Plan (Net Unrealized Appreciation).
Upon a sale of the Common Stock, the Net Unrealized Appreciation will be taxed at favorable
long-term capital gain rates. Gain in excess of the Net Unrealized Appreciation will be taxed as
either long-term or short-term capital gain depending upon how long you have held the Common Stock
from the date of distribution. You must hold the Common Stock for one year from the date of
distribution in order to qualify for the favorable long-term federal capital gain rate. In 2010,
the long-term federal capital gain rate is 15%. You may defer paying income tax upon a lump sum
distribution from the Qualified Plans by rolling over or transferring the distribution to another
qualified retirement plan or individual retirement account.
If the distribution from the Qualified Plans does not qualify as a lump sum distribution or if
you elect to include the value of a lump sum distribution of the Common Stock into income in the
year of distribution, you will be taxed on the fair market value of the Common Stock as of the date
of the distribution at ordinary income tax rates. Your basis in the Common Stock will equal fair
market value of the Common Stock on the date of distribution and your holding period for purposes
of determining long-term or short-term capital gain begins on such date.
If the fair market value of the Common Stock distributed is less than the Qualified Plans
basis in such stock, you will not recognize a loss at the time of the distribution. Your basis in
the Common Stock will be the same as the Qualified Plans basis in the stock. You may recognize a
capital loss upon the sale of the shares.
Nonqualified Plans: Upon the distribution of the Common Stock from the Nonqualified Plans,
you will pay income tax at the ordinary income tax rates on the fair market value of the Common
Stock on the date of distribution. There is no available tax deferral upon the distribution of
amounts from a nonqualified plan. Your tax basis is the fair market value of the Common Stock on
the date of distribution and your holding period for purposes of determining long-term or
short-term capital gain begins on such date.
Participants in the Qualified or Nonqualified Plans are urged to consult their own tax
advisors as to the specific tax consequences of distributions from Qualified Plans and Nonqualified
Plans
S-133
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares of our Common Stock offered and certain other legal matters will be
passed upon for us by the law firm of Williams Mullen.
EXPERTS
Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, have been incorporated by reference in this
Prospectus in reliance upon the report of Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C., registered independent
public accountants, incorporated by reference herein and upon the authority of said firm as experts
in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act) and file with the SEC proxy statements, Annual Reports on Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as required of a U.S. listed
company. You may read and copy any document we file at the SECs public reference room at 100 F
Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-888-SEC-0330 for further
information on the public reference rooms. Our SEC filings are also available to the public from
the SECs web site at www.sec.gov or our website at
http://www.snl.com/irweblinkx/corporateprofile.aspx?iid=4066242. Written requests for copies of
the documents we file with the SEC should be directed to Attn: Douglas J. Glenn, Executive Vice
President, General Counsel, and Chief Operating Officer at Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., 999
Waterside Dr., Suite 200, Norfolk, Virginia 23510.
S-134
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements: |
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-9 |
|
|
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-52 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-53 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-54 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-55 |
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
Norfolk, Virginia
We have audited Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting included
in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (a)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (b) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (c) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over
financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of
the companys annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely
basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in managements assessment.
F-2
|
|
|
Inadequate controls over the accounting for income taxes. The Company
lacked sufficient personnel with adequate technical skills related to
accounting for income taxes. |
|
|
|
|
In connection with the inadequate controls over accounting for income
taxes, the Company has restated the 2009 financial statements to
correct an error involving a reserve against deferred tax assets. |
|
|
|
|
Ineffective controls over the accounting for certain loan
transactions. Specifically, the Company lacked adequate controls over
accounting for loans or partial loans sold to other institutions and
accounting for payments and accrual of interest on nonaccrual loans. |
|
|
|
|
Ineffective controls and procedures related to certain information
technology applications and general computer controls. The Company did
not maintain adequate controls to prevent unauthorized access to
certain programs and data, and provide for periodic review and
monitoring of access including analysis of segregation of duties
conflicts. |
|
|
|
|
Weaknesses within the area of Human Resources were identified
including inadequate controls over access to payroll data and a lack
of procedures to review payroll changes and reconcile payroll data to
supporting documentation. |
This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests
applied in our audit of the 2009 financial statements, and this report does not affect our report
dated April 22, 2010, except for Notes 2 and 3, as to which the date is August 13, 2010, on those
financial statements.
In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement
of the objectives of the control criteria, Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. has not maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 of Hampton Roads
Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries and our report dated April 22, 2010, except for Notes 2 and 3, as
to which the date is August 13, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion.
Winchester, Virginia
April 22, 2010, except for Notes 2 and 3, as to which the date is August 13, 2010
F-3
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
Norfolk, Virginia
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the 2009 financial statements have
been restated to correct a misstatement.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements,
quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and
its subsidiary banks to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier I capital (as defined
in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and Tier I capital (as defined) to
average assets (as defined). The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and
declining levels of capital that raise substantial doubt about the ability to continue as a going
concern. The Company is in the process of implementing a capital plan, including receipt of
definitive agreements for the purchase of common shares that are contingent on certain shareholder
approvals. Managements plans and the status of the capital raise are described in Note 3. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Our report dated April 22, 2010, except for Notes 2 and 3, as to which the date is
August 13, 2010, expressed an opinion that Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. had not maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Winchester, Virginia
April 22, 2010, except for Notes 2 and 3, as to which the date is August 13, 2010
F-4
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
16,995 |
|
|
$ |
42,827 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
43,821 |
|
|
|
4,975 |
|
Overnight funds sold and due from Federal Reserve Bank |
|
|
139,228 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
161,062 |
|
|
|
149,637 |
|
Restricted equity securities, at cost |
|
|
29,779 |
|
|
|
27,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
12,615 |
|
|
|
5,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
2,426,692 |
|
|
|
2,599,526 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(132,697 |
) |
|
|
(51,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
2,293,995 |
|
|
|
2,548,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
97,512 |
|
|
|
101,335 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
8,788 |
|
|
|
12,272 |
|
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets, net of valuation allowance |
|
|
8,867 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
32,616 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
12,839 |
|
|
|
98,367 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
48,355 |
|
|
|
46,603 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
45,323 |
|
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,919,576 |
|
|
$ |
3,085,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing demand |
|
$ |
248,682 |
|
|
$ |
240,813 |
|
Interest bearing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand |
|
|
916,865 |
|
|
|
684,009 |
|
Savings |
|
|
82,860 |
|
|
|
118,001 |
|
Time deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than $100 |
|
|
889,788 |
|
|
|
858,787 |
|
$100 or more |
|
|
356,845 |
|
|
|
394,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
2,495,040 |
|
|
|
2,296,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
228,215 |
|
|
|
279,065 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
49,254 |
|
|
|
77,223 |
|
Overnight funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,300 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
5,814 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
18,481 |
|
|
|
9,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,794,563 |
|
|
|
2,740,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock - 1,000,000 shares authorized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A non-convertible, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock,
$1,000 liquidation value, 23,266 shares issued and outstanding on
December 31, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
19,919 |
|
|
|
18,292 |
|
Series B non-convertible, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock,
$1,000 liquidation value, 37,550 shares issued and outstanding on
December 31, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
39,729 |
|
|
|
40,953 |
|
Series C fixed rate, cumulative preferred stock, $1,000 liquidation
value, 80,347 shares issued and outstanding on December 31, 2009 and
2008 |
|
|
75,322 |
|
|
|
74,297 |
|
Common stock, $0.625 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized on
December 31, 2009 and 70,000,000 shares authorized on December 31, 2008;
22,154,320 shares issued and outstanding on December 31, 2009 and
21,777,937 on December 31, 2008 |
|
|
13,846 |
|
|
|
13,611 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
165,391 |
|
|
|
171,284 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
(188,448 |
) |
|
|
26,482 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
125,013 |
|
|
|
344,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,919,576 |
|
|
$ |
3,085,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
142,969 |
|
|
$ |
43,201 |
|
|
$ |
35,604 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
6,339 |
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
2,316 |
|
Overnight funds sold |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Interest bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
149,445 |
|
|
|
45,177 |
|
|
|
38,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand |
|
|
7,512 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
Savings |
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
Time deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than $100 |
|
|
14,513 |
|
|
|
6,536 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
$100 or more |
|
|
12,880 |
|
|
|
4,785 |
|
|
|
4,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits |
|
|
36,015 |
|
|
|
14,092 |
|
|
|
11,657 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
4,184 |
|
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
3,704 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
|
|
Overnight funds purchased |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
44,294 |
|
|
|
17,917 |
|
|
|
14,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
105,151 |
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
|
|
24,187 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
134,223 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(29,072 |
) |
|
|
25,842 |
|
|
|
22,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
8,117 |
|
|
|
3,379 |
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
Mortgage banking revenue |
|
|
4,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
4,274 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Extinguishment of debt charge |
|
|
(1,962 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on foreclosed real estate |
|
|
(1,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of securities (includes
total other-than-temporary impairment losses of $2,659 and
$561, net of $190 and $0 recognized in other comprehensive
income for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, before taxes) |
|
|
(2,469 |
) |
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Insurance revenue |
|
|
4,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokerage revenue |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from bank owned life insurance |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
22,325 |
|
|
|
5,980 |
|
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
42,285 |
|
|
|
11,518 |
|
|
|
9,954 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
9,044 |
|
|
|
2,261 |
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
5,368 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
84,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
5,661 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
4,735 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
Other |
|
|
18,865 |
|
|
|
5,094 |
|
|
|
3,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
170,795 |
|
|
|
20,987 |
|
|
|
15,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(177,542 |
) |
|
|
10,835 |
|
|
|
10,401 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
23,908 |
|
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(201,450 |
) |
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
|
6,811 |
|
Preferred stock dividend and accretion of discount |
|
|
8,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(210,139 |
) |
|
$ |
7,175 |
|
|
$ |
6,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(9.63 |
) |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(9.63 |
) |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
21,816,407 |
|
|
|
11,960,604 |
|
|
|
10,228,638 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and non-vested stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,121 |
|
|
|
202,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
21,816,407 |
|
|
|
12,074,725 |
|
|
|
10,431,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
(in thousands, except |
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
share data) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital Surplus |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December 31,
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
10,251,336 |
|
|
$ |
6,407 |
|
|
$ |
42,106 |
|
|
$ |
22,091 |
|
|
$ |
(441 |
) |
|
$ |
70,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,811 |
|
Change in unrealized loss
on securities
available-for-sale, net of
taxes of $253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,302 |
|
Shares issued related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k) plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,020 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
Executive savings plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,686 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
Regional board fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,599 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707 |
|
Dividend reinvestment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,991 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
2,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,864 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
Common stock repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232,490 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(2,962 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,107 |
) |
Tax benefit of stock
option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
Common stock cash
dividends ($0.43 per
share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
10,314,899 |
|
|
$ |
6,447 |
|
|
$ |
42,677 |
|
|
$ |
24,486 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
73,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,175 |
|
Change in unrealized loss
on securities
available-for-sale, net of
taxes of ($118) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(229 |
) |
Reclassification
adjustment for securities
gains included in net
income, net of taxes of
$35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,015 |
|
Shares issued related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive savings plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,582 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
Regional board fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,510 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,964 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580 |
|
Dividend reinvestment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,460 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,908 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
Acquisition of Shore
Financial Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,713,425 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
29,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,205 |
|
Acquisition of Gateway
Financial Holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,513,595 |
|
|
|
5,321 |
|
|
|
88,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,160 |
|
Series A non-cumulative
perpetual preferred stock |
|
|
23,266 |
|
|
|
18,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,292 |
|
Series B non-cumulative
perpetual preferred stock |
|
|
37,550 |
|
|
|
40,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,953 |
|
Series C fixed rate
cumulative preferred stock
and warrant |
|
|
80,347 |
|
|
|
74,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,347 |
|
Common stock repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,406 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(1,372 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,454 |
) |
Options acquired in mergers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,587 |
|
Tax benefit of stock
option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Common stock cash
dividends ($0.44 per
share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2008 |
|
|
141,163 |
|
|
$ |
133,542 |
|
|
|
21,777,937 |
|
|
$ |
13,611 |
|
|
$ |
171,284 |
|
|
$ |
26,482 |
|
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
344,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (as restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201,450 |
) |
Change in unrealized loss
on securities
available-for-sale, net of
taxes of $207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
Reclassification
adjustment for securities
gains included in net
income, net of taxes of
($657) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,149 |
) |
|
|
(1,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(202,086 |
) |
Shares issued related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional board fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,676 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,243 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613 |
|
Dividend reinvestment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,748 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,765 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630 |
|
Private placement shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,771 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
Common stock repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,820 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(544 |
) |
Amortization of fair
market value adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403 |
|
Tax benefit of stock
option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
Stock financed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,500 |
) |
Preferred stock dividend
declared and amortization
of preferred stock
discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,664 |
) |
Common stock cash
dividends ($0.22 per
share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2009 As Restated |
|
|
141,163 |
|
|
$ |
134,970 |
|
|
|
22,154,320 |
|
|
$ |
13,846 |
|
|
$ |
165,391 |
|
|
$ |
(188,448 |
) |
|
$ |
(746 |
) |
|
$ |
125,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(201,450 |
) |
|
$ |
7,175 |
|
|
$ |
6,811 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,511 |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets and fair value adjustments |
|
|
(8,263 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
134,223 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
Deferred board fees |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Proceeds from mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
259,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(267,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on investment
securities |
|
|
(2,680 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Losses on foreclosed real estate and repossesed assets |
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(4,274 |
) |
|
|
(457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings on bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(1,658 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of securities |
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
84,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(24,065 |
) |
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
(568 |
) |
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
57,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(38,200 |
) |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Interest payable |
|
|
(2,242 |
) |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,888 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
10,297 |
|
|
|
9,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and calls of debt securities available-for-sale |
|
|
45,799 |
|
|
|
11,215 |
|
|
|
15,171 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
84,121 |
|
|
|
18,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of debt securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(137,569 |
) |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
Purchase of equity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of restricted equity securities |
|
|
9,824 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
Purchase of restricted equity securities |
|
|
(11,787 |
) |
|
|
(6,885 |
) |
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of loans |
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in loans |
|
|
100,575 |
|
|
|
(111,879 |
) |
|
|
(102,195 |
) |
Purchase of premises and equipment |
|
|
(2,901 |
) |
|
|
(4,499 |
) |
|
|
(720 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate |
|
|
4,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
93,644 |
|
|
|
(90,809 |
) |
|
|
(89,663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
|
212,908 |
|
|
|
(37,499 |
) |
|
|
68,196 |
|
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
49,450 |
|
|
|
226,912 |
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
(94,016 |
) |
|
|
(218,445 |
) |
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in overnight funds borrowed |
|
|
(73,300 |
) |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in other borrowings |
|
|
(28,000 |
) |
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash exchanged in mergers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchased |
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
(2,877 |
) |
Issuance of private placement shares |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares to 401(k) plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
Issuance of shares to executive savings plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Issuance of Series C preferred stock and warrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
Excess tax benefit realized from stock options exercised |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Preferred stock dividends paid and amortization of preferred stock discount |
|
|
(7,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends paid, net of reinvestment |
|
|
(4,260 |
) |
|
|
(2,936 |
) |
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
56,117 |
|
|
|
103,260 |
|
|
|
79,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
151,732 |
|
|
|
22,748 |
|
|
|
(1,235 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
48,312 |
|
|
|
25,564 |
|
|
|
26,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
200,044 |
|
|
$ |
48,312 |
|
|
$ |
25,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
46,536 |
|
|
$ |
17,613 |
|
|
$ |
13,852 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
13,714 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental non-cash information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends reinvested |
|
$ |
531 |
|
|
$ |
2,243 |
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
Value of shares exchanged in exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities |
|
|
(957 |
) |
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
744 |
|
Transfer between loans and other real estate owned |
|
|
9,686 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Transfer between premises and equipment and loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Stock financed |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions related to acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,972,398 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
267,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,902,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
324,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock and stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
(1) |
|
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
Basis of Presentation. Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) is a multi-bank holding
company incorporated in 2001 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The consolidated
financial statements of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries: Bank of Hampton Roads (BOHR), Shore Bank (Shore), and Hampton Roads
Investments, Inc., as well as their wholly owned subsidiaries: Bank of Hampton Roads Service
Corporation; Gateway Bank Mortgage, Inc.; Gateway Investment Services, Inc.; Gateway Insurance
Services, Inc.; Gateway Title Agency, Inc.; Shore Investments, Inc.; and Insurance Express Premium
Finance. The Company also owns Gateway Capital Statutory Trust I, Gateway Capital Statutory Trust
II, Gateway Capital Statutory Trust III, and Gateway Capital Statutory Trust IV. In accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-17, the
Gateway Capital Trusts are not consolidated as part of the Companys consolidated financial
statements. However, the junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to the trusts are
included in long-term borrowings and the Companys equity interest in the trusts is included in
other assets. Additionally, all significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
|
Use of Estimates. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to changes in the near term are the
allowance for loan losses, the valuation of deferred tax assets, the fair value of stock options,
and the estimated fair value of financial instruments. |
|
|
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The following is a summary of the significant
accounting and reporting policies used in preparing the consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
Cash and Due from Bank Accounts. For the purpose of presentation in the consolidated
statements of cash flows, the Company considers cash and due from banks, overnight funds sold and
due from Federal Reserve Bank, and interest-bearing deposits in other banks as cash and cash
equivalents. |
|
|
|
The Company is required to maintain average reserve balances in cash with the Federal Reserve Bank
(FRB). The amounts of daily average required reserves for the final weekly reporting period were
$26.4 million and $4.1 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
|
|
|
Investment Securities. Certain debt securities that management has the positive intent and
ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity and recorded at amortized cost.
Trading securities are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value included in earnings.
Securities not classified as held to maturity or trading, including equity securities with readily
determinable fair values, are classified as available-for-sale and recorded at fair value, with
unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income.
Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over
the terms of the securities. Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade
date and are determined using the specific identification method. |
|
|
|
Impairment of securities occurs when the fair value of the security is less than its amortized
cost. For debt securities, impairment is considered other-than-temporary and recognized in its
entirety in net income if either we intend to sell the security or it is more-likely-than-not that
we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If, however,
we do not intend to sell the security and it is not more-likely-than-not that we will be required
to sell the security before recovery, we must determine what portion of the impairment is
attributable to a credit loss, which occurs when the amortized cost basis of the security exceeds
the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the security. If there is credit
loss, the loss must be recognized in net income and the remaining portion of impairment must be
recognized in other comprehensive income. For equity securities, impairment is considered to be
other-than-temporary based on our ability and intent to hold the |
|
|
|
investment until a recovery of fair value. Other-than-temporary impairment of an equity security
results in a write-down that must be included in net income. We regularly review each investment
security for other-than-temporary impairment based on criteria that include the extent to which
cost exceeds market price, the duration of that market decline, the financial health of and
specific prospects for the issuer, our best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to
be collected from debt securities, our intention with regard to holding the security to maturity,
and the likelihood that we would be required to sell the security before recovery. |
F-9
|
|
Prior to the adoption of the recent accounting guidance on April 1, 2009, management considered, in
determining whether other-than-temporary impairment exists, the length of time and the extent to
which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of
the issuer, and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a
period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. |
|
|
|
For equity securities, when the Company has decided to sell an impaired available-for-sale security
and the entity does not expect the fair value of the security to fully recover before the expected
time of sale, the security is deemed other-than-temporarily impaired in the period in which the
decision to sell is made. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the impairment is deemed
other-than-temporary even if a decision to sell has not been made. |
|
|
|
Restricted Equity Securities. As a requirement for membership, the Company invests in stock
of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB), Community Bankers Bank, and FRB. These
investments are carried at cost due to the redemption provisions of these entities and the
restricted nature of the securities. Management reviews for impairment based on the ultimate
recoverability of the cost basis of these stocks. |
|
|
|
Loans. The Company grants mortgage, commercial, and consumer loans to customers. A
substantial portion of the loan portfolio is represented by mortgage loans throughout Virginia and
North Carolina. The ability of the Companys debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the
real estate and general economic conditions in this area. Loans that management has the intent and
ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off are reported at their
outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, and
any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal
balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred over the life
of the loan and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest and
straight-line methods. Net fees related to standby letters of credit are recognized over the
commitment period. In those instances when a loan prepays, the remaining deferred fee is recognized
in the income statement. |
|
|
|
As a general rule, loans are placed in nonaccrual status when principal or interest is 90 days or
more past due. The delinquency status of the loan is determined by the contractual terms of the
loan. Accrual of interest ceases at that time and uncollected past due interest is reversed. Cash
payments received on loans in nonaccrual status are generally applied to reduce the outstanding
principal balance, however, during 2009, cash payments in the amount of $1.2 million were recorded
as interest income on nonaccrual loans. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal
and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably
assured. |
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance
consisting of the cumulative effect of the provision for loan losses, less loans charged off, in
addition to any amounts recovered on loans previously charged off. The provision for loan losses is
the amount necessary, in managements judgment, to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a
level it believes sufficient to cover incurred losses in the collection of the Companys loans.
Loans are charged against the allowance when, in managements opinion, they are deemed
uncollectible. Recoveries of loans previously charged off are credited to the allowance when
realized. |
|
|
|
The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates to
loans that are classified as impaired. For those loans that are classified as impaired, an
allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value, or observable market
price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component
covers non-classified loans and is based on historical charge-off experience and expected loss
given default derived from the Companys internal risk rating process. Other adjustments may be
made to the allowance for pools of loans after an assessment of internal or external influences on
credit quality that are not fully reflected in the historical loss or risk rating data. |
F-10
|
|
A loan is deemed impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all
amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Certain loans are
individually evaluated for impairment in accordance with the Companys ongoing loan review
procedures. Smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Impaired
loans are measured at the present value of their expected future cash flows by discounting those
cash flows at the loans effective interest rate or at the loans observable market price or the
fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The difference between this
discounted amount and the loan balance is recorded as an allowance for loan losses. Once a loan is
considered impaired, it continues to be considered impaired until the collection of scheduled
interest and principal is considered probable or the balance is charged off. |
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon
managements periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical loss
experience, risk characteristics of the various categories of loans, adverse situations affecting
individual loans, loan risk grades, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing
economic conditions. Further adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary based on
changes in economic and real estate market conditions, further information regarding known problem
loans, results of regulatory examinations, the identification of additional problem loans, and
other factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are
susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. |
|
|
Loans Held for Sale. The Company originates single family, residential, first lien mortgage
loans that have been approved by secondary market investors. The Company classifies loans
originated with the intent of selling them in the secondary market as held for sale. Loans
originated for sale are primarily sold in the secondary market as whole loans. Whole loan sales are
executed with the servicing rights being released to the buyer upon the sale, with the gain or loss
on the sale equal to the difference between the proceeds received and the carrying value of the
loans sold. |
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value in the aggregate. The
fair value of mortgage loans held for sale is determined using current secondary market prices for
loans with similar coupons, maturities, and credit quality. The fair value of mortgage loans held
for sale is impacted by changes in market interest rates. Net unrealized losses, if any, are
recognized through a valuation allowance. |
|
|
|
The Company enters into commitments to originate or purchase loans whereby the interest rate of the
loan was determined prior to funding (interest rate lock commitments). Interest rate lock
commitments on mortgage loans that the Company intended to sell in the secondary market were
considered freestanding derivatives. These derivatives are carried at fair value with changes in
fair value reported as a component of gain on sale of the loans in accordance with the Securities
and Exchange Commissions Staff Account Bulletin No. 109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair
Value Through Earnings. |
|
|
|
Premises and Equipment. Land is reported at cost, while premises and equipment are reported
at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from three
years for equipment to 40 years for premises. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a
straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases, including renewal options, or the
estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Routine holding costs are charged
to expense as incurred, while significant improvements are capitalized. |
|
|
|
Goodwill and Other Intangibles. Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 350, Intangibles
Goodwill and other Intangibles, states goodwill is not subject to amortization over its
estimated useful life, but is subject to an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair
value based test. Additionally, acquired intangible assets are separately recognized if the benefit
of the assets can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged; they are amortized over
their estimated useful life. |
|
|
|
Foreclosed Real Estate and Repossessed Assets. Foreclosed real estate and repossessed
assets include real estate acquired in the settlement of loans and other repossessed collateral.
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans is initially recorded at the lower of the recorded loan
balance or fair market value less estimated disposal costs. At foreclosure any excess of the loan
balance over the fair value of the property is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Such
carrying value is periodically reevaluated and written down if there is an indicated decline in
fair value. Costs to bring a property to salable condition are capitalized up to the fair value of
the property while costs to maintain a property in salable condition are expensed as incurred.
Gains and losses on sales of foreclosed real estate and valuation allowance are recognized in
noninterest income upon disposition. |
F-11
|
|
Long-Lived Assets. The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 360,
Property, Plant, and Equipment, which requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. |
|
|
|
Bank Owned Life Insurance. The Company purchased life insurance policies on the lives of
certain officers. The policies are recorded as an asset at the cash surrender value of the
policies. Increases or decreases in the cash surrender value, other than proceeds from death
benefits, are recorded as noninterest income. Proceeds from death benefits first reduce the cash
surrender value attributable to the individual policy and then any additional proceeds are recorded
as noninterest income. |
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition. Revenue earned on interest-earning assets is recognized based on the
effective yield of the financial instrument. Service charges on deposit accounts are recognized as
charged. Credit-related fees, including letter of credit fees, are recognized in noninterest income
when earned. |
|
|
|
Insurance commission income is recorded as of the effective date of insurance coverage or the
billing date, whichever is later. Contingent commissions are recognized when determinable, which is
generally when such commissions are received or when the Company receives data from the insurance
companies that allow the reasonable estimation of these amounts. The income effects of subsequent
premium and fee adjustments are recorded when the adjustments become known. |
|
|
|
Advertising Costs. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. |
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation. According to ASC 718, Compensation Stock Compensation, the
Company uses the fair value method, which requires that compensation cost relating to stock based
transactions be recognized in the financial statements, to account for
stock-based compensation and the fair value of stock options is estimated at the date of grant
using a lattice option pricing model. Stock options granted with pro rata vesting schedules are
expensed over the vesting period on a straight line basis. |
|
|
|
Income Taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the balance
sheet method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the
tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance
sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws. |
|
|
|
ASC 740, Income Taxes, clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the
financial statement and requires the impact of a tax position to be recognized in the financial
statements if that position is more likely than not of being sustained by the taxing authority. |
|
|
|
A deferred tax liability is recognized for all temporary differences that will result in future
taxable income; a deferred tax asset is recognized for all temporary differences that will result
in future tax deductions, subject to reduction of the asset by a valuation allowance in certain
circumstances. This valuation allowance is recognized if, based on an analysis of available
evidence, management determines that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance is subject to ongoing adjustment
based on changes in circumstances that affect managements judgment about the realizability of the
deferred tax asset. Adjustments to increase or decrease the valuation allowance are charged or
credited, respectively, to income tax expense. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties
related to income tax matters in income tax expense. |
|
|
|
Per Share Data. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss)
available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for
the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the dilutive effect of stock options and
non-vested stock using the treasury stock method. For the year ended December 31, 2009, all options
were anti-dilutive since the Company had a net loss available to common shareholders. There were
249,288 average anti-dilutive stock options for the year ended December 31, 2008, and there were no
anti-dilutive stock options for the year ended December 31, 2007. |
F-12
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss). Accounting principles generally require that recognized
revenue, expenses, gains, and losses be included in net income or loss. Although certain changes in
assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are
reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with
the operating net income or loss, are components of comprehensive income or loss. |
|
|
|
Credit Related Financial Instruments. In the ordinary course of business, the Company has
entered into commitments to extend credit including commitments under home equity lines of credit,
overdraft protection arrangements, commercial lines of credit, and standby letters of credit. Such
financial instruments are recorded when they are funded. |
|
|
|
Concentrations of Credit Risk. Construction and mortgage loans represented 83% and 81% of
the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Substantially all such loans
are collateralized by real property. Loans in these categories and their collateral values are
continuously monitored by management. |
|
|
|
At times the Company may have cash and cash equivalents at a financial institution in excess of
insured limits. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality financial
institutions whose credit rating is monitored by management to minimize credit risk. The amount on
deposit with correspondent institutions at December 31, 2009 exceeded the insurance limits of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation by $386 thousand. |
|
|
|
Reclassification. Certain 2008 and 2007 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
2009 presentation. |
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
|
|
In June 2009, FASB issued new accounting guidance related to U.S. GAAP, ASC 105, Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. This guidance establishes FASB ASC as the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP
recognized by FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of
the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for
SEC registrants. FASB ASC supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All
other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in FASB ASC has become
non-authoritative. FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff
Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue ASUs, which will serve
to update FASB ASC, provide background information about the guidance, and provide the basis for
conclusions on the changes to FASB ASC. FASB ASC is not intended to change U.S. GAAP or any
requirements of the SEC. |
|
|
|
The Company adopted new guidance impacting ASC 805, Business Combinations on January 1, 2009. This
guidance requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the full fair value
of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction
(whether a full or partial acquisition), establishes the acquisition date fair value as the
measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed, requires expensing of most
transaction and restructuring costs, and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other
users all of the information needed to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of
the business combination. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance impacting ASC 805. This guidance addresses application
issues raised by preparers, auditors, and members of the legal profession on initial recognition
and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities
arising from contingencies in a business combination. This guidance was effective for business
combinations entered into on or after January 1, 2009. This guidance did not have a material impact
on the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance impacting ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. This interpretation provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when the
volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This also
includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly and
requires additional disclosures of valuation inputs and techniques in interim periods and defines
the major security types that are required to be disclosed. This guidance was effective for interim
and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and should be applied prospectively. The adoption of
this standard did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
F-13
|
|
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance impacting ASC 320-10, Investments Debt and Equity
Securities. This guidance amends GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and
to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity
securities in the financial statements. This guidance was effective for interim and annual periods
ending after June 15, 2009, with earlier adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15,
2009. The additional disclosures required are included in the consolidated Statements of Operations
and in Note 3 to the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance impacting ASC 855, Subsequent Events. This update
provides guidance on managements assessment of subsequent events that occur after the balance
sheet date through the date that the financial statements are issued. This guidance is generally
consistent with current accounting practice. In addition, it requires certain additional
disclosures. This guidance was effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009 and the required
disclosure is included as Note 27 to the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In August 2009, the FASB issued new guidance impacting ASC 820. This guidance is intended to reduce
ambiguity in financial reporting when measuring the fair value of liabilities. This guidance was
effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) after issuance and had no
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In September 2009, the FASB issued new guidance impacting ASC 820. This creates a practical
expedient to measure the fair value of an alternative investment that does not have a readily
determinable fair value. This guidance also requires certain additional disclosures. This guidance
is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The Company does not
expect the adoption of the new guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements. |
|
|
|
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-02, Consolidation: Accounting and Reporting for Decreases
in Ownership of a Subsidiary a Scope Clarification. ASU 2010-02 amends ASC 810-10 to address
implementation issues related to changes in ownership provisions including clarifying the scope of
the decrease in ownership and additional disclosures. ASU 2010-02 is effective beginning in the
period that an entity adopts Statement 160. If an entity has previously adopted Statement 160, ASU
2010-02 is effective beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after
December 15, 2009 and should be applied retrospectively to the first period Statement 160 was
adopted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-02 to have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-01, Equity: Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders
with Components of Stock and Cash a Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. ASU
2010-01 clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to
elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all
shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected
in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend. ASU 2010-01 is effective for interim and annual
periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and should be applied on a retrospective basis. The
Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-01 to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements. |
|
|
|
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to the accounting for transfers of financial
assets. The new guidance, which was issued as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
amendment to SFAS No. 140, was adopted into Codification in December 2009 through the issuance of
ASU 2009-16. The new standard provides guidance to improve the relevance, representational
faithfulness, and comparability of the information that an entity provides in its financial
statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement, if any,
in transferred financial assets. The Company will adopt the new guidance in 2010 and is evaluating
the impact it will have, if any, on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to the variable interest entities. The new
guidance, which was issued as SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), was
adopted into Codification in December 2009. The objective of the guidance is to improve financial
reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and
reliable information to users of financial statements. SFAS No. 167 is effective as of January 1,
2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new guidance to have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements. |
F-14
|
|
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-15, Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in
Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing. ASU 2009-15 amends Subtopic 470-20
to expand accounting and reporting guidance for own-share lending arrangements issued in
contemplation of convertible debt issuance. ASU 2009-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning on
or after December 15, 2009 and interim periods within those fiscal years for arrangements
outstanding as of the beginning of those fiscal years. The Company does not expect the adoption of
ASU 2009-15 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-04, Accounting for Various Topics Technical
Corrections to SEC Paragraphs. ASU 2010-04 makes technical corrections to existing SEC guidance
including accounting for subsequent investments, termination of an interest rate swap, issuance of
financial statements subsequent events, use of residential method to value acquired assets other
than goodwill, adjustments in assets and liabilities for holding gains and losses, and selections
of discount rate used for measuring defined benefit obligation. The Company does not expect the
adoption of ASU 2010-04 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-05, Compensation Stock Compensation: Escrowed Share
Arrangements and the Presumption of Compensation. ASU 2010-05 updates existing guidance to address
the SEC staffs views on overcoming the presumption that for certain shareholders escrowed share
arrangements represent compensation. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-05 to
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures:
Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends ASC 820-10 to clarify
existing disclosures, require new disclosures, and include conforming amendments to guidance on
employers disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for
interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010
and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU
2010-06 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-08, Technical Corrections to Various Topics. ASU 2010-08
clarifies guidance on embedded derivatives and hedging. ASU 2010-08 is effective for interim and
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU
2010-08 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
F-15
(2) |
|
Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
Subsequent to filing the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009,
the Company determined that a valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets should be recognized
as of December 31, 2009. The Company decided to establish a valuation allowance against the
deferred tax asset because it is uncertain when it will realize this asset. |
|
|
|
Accordingly, the December 31, 2009 consolidated financial statements have been restated to account
for this determination. The effect of this change in the consolidated financial statements was as
follows (in thousands, except per share amounts). |
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
Adjustment |
|
As Restated |
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
$ |
56,380 |
|
|
$ |
(55,983 |
) |
|
$ |
397 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,975,559 |
|
|
|
(55,983 |
) |
|
|
2,919,576 |
|
Retained earnings deficit |
|
|
(132,465 |
) |
|
|
(55,983 |
) |
|
|
(188,448 |
) |
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
180,996 |
|
|
|
(55,983 |
) |
|
|
125,013 |
|
Total Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
2,975,559 |
|
|
|
(55,983 |
) |
|
|
2,919,576 |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
Adjustment |
|
As Restated |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
(32,075 |
) |
|
$ |
55,983 |
|
|
$ |
23,908 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(145,467 |
) |
|
|
(55,983 |
) |
|
|
(201,450 |
) |
Net loss available to common shareholders |
|
|
(154,156 |
) |
|
|
(55,983 |
) |
|
|
(210,139 |
) |
Loss per share basic |
|
|
(7.07 |
) |
|
|
(2.56 |
) |
|
|
(9.63 |
) |
Loss per share diluted |
|
|
(7.07 |
) |
|
|
(2.56 |
) |
|
|
(9.63 |
) |
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
Adjustment |
|
As Restated |
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(145,467 |
) |
|
$ |
(55,983 |
) |
|
$ |
(201,450 |
) |
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(23,032 |
) |
|
|
(1,033 |
) |
|
|
(24,065 |
) |
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,015 |
|
|
|
57,015 |
|
|
Quarterly Financial Data Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
Adjustment |
|
As Restated |
Provision for income taxes (benefit) |
|
$ |
(18,650 |
) |
|
$ |
55,983 |
|
|
$ |
37,333 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(96,228 |
) |
|
|
(55,983 |
) |
|
|
(152,211 |
) |
Net loss available to common shareholders |
|
|
(97,598 |
) |
|
|
(55,983 |
) |
|
|
(153,581 |
) |
Loss per share basic |
|
|
(4.45 |
) |
|
|
(2.57 |
) |
|
|
(7.02 |
) |
Loss per share diluted |
|
|
(4.45 |
) |
|
|
(2.57 |
) |
|
|
(7.02 |
) |
(3) |
|
Regulatory Matters and Going Concern Considerations |
|
|
Effective June 17, 2010, the Company and BOHR entered into a written agreement (herein called the
Written Agreement) with the FRB and the Bureau of Financial Institutions of the Virginia State
Corporation Commission (Bureau of Financial Institutions). The Companys other banking
subsidiary, Shore Bank, is not a party to the Written Agreement. |
|
|
|
Written Agreement |
|
|
|
Under the terms of the Written Agreement, the Bank has agreed to develop and submit for approval,
within the time periods specified, plans to: (a) strengthen board oversight of management and the
Banks operations, (b) strengthen credit risk management policies, (c) improve the Banks position
with respect to loans, relationships, or other assets in excess of $2.5 million which are now, or
may in the future become, past due more than 90 days, are on the Banks problem loan list, or
adversely classified in any report of examination of the Bank, (d) review and revise, as
appropriate, current policy and maintain sound processes for determining, documenting, and
recording an adequate allowance for loan and lease losses, (e) improve management of the Banks
liquidity position and funds management policies, (f) provide contingency planning that accounts
for adverse scenarios and identifies and quantifies available sources of liquidity for each
scenario, (g) reduce the Banks reliance on brokered deposits, and (h) improve the Banks earnings
and overall condition. |
|
|
|
In addition, the Bank has agreed that it will (a) not extend, renew, or restructure any credit that
has been criticized by the FRB or the Bureau of Financial Institutions absent prior board of
directors approval in accordance with the restrictions in the Written Agreement, (b) eliminate all
assets or portions of assets classified as loss and thereafter charge off all assets classified
as loss in a federal or state report of examination, unless otherwise approved by the FRB, (c)
comply with legal and regulatory limitations on indemnification payments and severance payments,
and (d) appoint a committee to monitor compliance with the terms of the Written Agreement. |
|
|
|
In addition, the Company has agreed that it will (a) not take any other form of payment
representing a reduction in the Banks capital or make any distributions of interest, principal, or
other sums on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities absent prior regulatory
approval, (b) take all necessary steps to correct certain technical violations of law and
regulation cited by the FRB, (c) refrain from guaranteeing any debt without the prior written
approval of the FRB and the Bureau of Financial Institutions, and (d) refrain from purchasing or
redeeming any shares of its stock without the prior written consent of the FRB or the Bureau of
Financial Institutions. |
F-16
|
|
Under the terms of the Written Agreement, both the Company and the Bank have agreed to submit for
approval capital plans to maintain sufficient capital at the Company, on a consolidated basis, and
to refrain from declaring or paying dividends absent prior regulatory approval. |
|
|
|
Going Concern Considerations |
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2009 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the
realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of business for the
foreseeable future. Due to the Companys 2009 financial results, the substantial uncertainty
throughout the U.S. banking industry, the Written Agreement the Company and the Bank have entered
into and described above and the Banks undercapitalized status, doubt exists regarding the
Companys ability to continue as a going concern. This concern is mitigated by the capital raise
expected to close in the third quarter of 2010. With this new capital, the Company and BOHR are
expected to return to well capitalized status. |
|
|
|
Operating Losses |
|
|
|
The Company incurred a net loss of $201.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This loss
was largely the result of dramatic increases in non-performing assets and the impairment of
goodwill. Additionally, due to these recent significant losses, the Company was unable to ascertain
it would generate sufficient net income in the near term to realize its deferred tax assets, and
therefore, established a deferred tax valuation allowance on its net deferred tax position. |
|
|
|
Capital Adequacy |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, the Company was considered undercapitalized under regulatory guidelines
and must improve its capital in accordance with the Written Agreement. |
|
|
|
In connection with this, the Company and affiliates of The Carlyle Group, Anchorage Advisors,
L.L.C., CapGen Financial Group and other institutional investors have entered into a binding
agreement (the Investment Agreement), which is anticipated to close on or before September 30,
2010, to purchase common stock of the Company, as part of an expected aggregate $255.0 million
capital raise by the Company from institutional investors in a private placement. The private
placement is fully subscribed and will include the opportunity to raise an additional $20 to $40
million in common stock through a rights offering to the Companys existing shareholders. |
|
|
|
Additionally, the Company has entered into an agreement with the Treasury pursuant to which
Treasury will exchange all of the cumulative preferred stock it purchased from the Company in 2008
under Treasurys Capital Purchase Program for a new series of mandatorily convertible preferred
stock, which will convert into the Companys common stock upon closing of the capital raise
discussed above. |
|
|
|
Management believes the capital raise will greatly strengthen its balance sheet and return the
Company to well capitalized status under the regulatory capital standards. |
|
|
|
Liquidity |
|
|
|
Our primary sources of liquidity are our deposits, the scheduled repayments on our loans, and
interest and maturities of our investments. All securities have been classified as available for
sale, which means they are carried at fair value, and we have the ability to sell or pledge a
portion of our unpledged investment securities to manage liquidity. Due to the Banks
undercapitalized status, we are unable to accept, rollover, or renew any brokered deposits. At
December 31, 2009 the Company had approximately $300 million in available cash on hand and
unpledged investment securities of approximately $70 million. |
|
|
|
Based on our current and expected liquidity needs and sources, management expects to be able to
meet all of its obligations at least through December 31, 2010. |
F-17
(4) |
|
Mergers and Acquisitions |
|
|
Shore Financial Corporation (SFC) |
|
|
|
On June 1, 2008, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of SFC. The shareholders of SFC
received, for each share of SFC common stock that they owned immediately prior to the effective
time of the merger, either $22 per share in cash or 1.8 shares of the Companys common stock. In
addition, at the effective time of the merger, each outstanding option to purchase shares of SFCs
common stock under any stock plans vested pursuant to its terms and was converted into an option to
acquire the number of shares of the Companys common stock equal to the number of shares of SFC
common stock underlying the option multiplied by 1.8. The exercise price of each option was
adjusted accordingly. The aggregate purchase price was $58.1 million, including common stock valued
at $31.2 million, SFC stock held by the Company as an investment of $800 thousand, stock options
exchanged valued at $1.2 million, cash of $21.0 million, and direct costs of the merger of $3.9
million. Net assets (in thousands) acquired are shown in the table below. |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
16,250 |
|
Loans, net |
|
|
220,450 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
27,898 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
4,755 |
|
Employment agreement intangible |
|
|
160 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
33,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
303,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
208,402 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
34,228 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
2,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
245,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
58,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The merger transaction was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and is qualified
as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The merger resulted
in the recording of $27.9 million of goodwill and $4.8 million of core deposit intangible assets.
During the second quarter of 2009, goodwill related to the SFC acquisition was determined to be
impaired, and an impairment expense of $27.9 million was recorded. The core deposit intangible
asset was based on an independent valuation and is being amortized over the estimated life of the
core deposits of eight years, based on undiscounted cash flows. In order to finance the merger
transaction, the Company borrowed $23.0 million, which was completely paid off during second
quarter 2009. |
|
|
|
Gateway Financial Holdings (GFH) |
|
|
|
On December 31, 2008 the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of GFH. The shareholders of
GFH received, for each share of GFH common stock that they owned immediately prior to the effective
time of the merger 0.67 shares of Company common stock. Each of GFHs preferred shares outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time of the merger converted into new preferred shares of the
Company that have substantially identical rights. In addition, at the effective time of the merger,
each outstanding option to purchase shares of GFHs common stock under any stock plans were
converted into an option to acquire the number of shares of Company common stock equal to the
number of shares of GFH common stock underlying the option multiplied by 0.67. The exercise price
of each option was adjusted accordingly. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $161.0
million, including common stock valued at $94.2 million, preferred stock valued at $59.3 million,
GFH stock held by the Company as an investment of $200 thousand, stock options exchanged valued at
$1.4 million, and direct costs of the merger of $5.9 million. |
F-18
|
|
Net assets acquired, based on fair value adjustments, are shown in the table below (in
thousands). |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
117,706 |
|
Loans, net |
|
|
1,752,793 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
56,939 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
3,282 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
7,485 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
205,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
2,143,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,688,473 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
289,497 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
1,982,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
160,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The merger transaction was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and is qualified
as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The merger resulted
in the recording of $56.9 million of goodwill and $3.3 million of core deposit intangible assets.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, goodwill related to the GFH acquisition was determined to be
impaired, and an impairment expense of $56.9 million was recorded. The core deposit intangible
assets were based on an independent valuation and will be amortized over the estimated life of the
core deposits of 4.5 years, based on undiscounted cash flows. |
|
|
|
Pro forma Financial Information |
|
|
|
The Companys consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of SFC and GFH
from the date of acquisition. Pro forma condensed consolidated income statements (in thousands) for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 are shown as if the mergers occurred at the beginning of
each year as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
171,295 |
|
|
$ |
162,913 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
77,462 |
|
|
|
74,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
93,833 |
|
|
|
88,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
44,874 |
|
|
|
6,059 |
|
Noninterest income (loss) |
|
|
(11,456 |
) |
|
|
24,605 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
85,438 |
|
|
|
70,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before for income taxes |
|
|
(47,935 |
) |
|
|
36,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(18,575 |
) |
|
|
12,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(29,360 |
) |
|
$ |
23,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(1.36 |
) |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(1.36 |
) |
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
(5) |
|
Investment Securities |
|
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities available-for-sale (in
thousands) at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
U.S. agency securities |
|
|
11,376 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
11,444 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
146,583 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
145,726 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
162,204 |
|
|
$ |
685 |
|
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
$ |
161,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
$ |
18,186 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
18,217 |
|
U.S. agency securities |
|
|
24,584 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,999 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
95,202 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,248 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
5,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,093 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
6,747 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
6,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
149,812 |
|
|
$ |
519 |
|
|
$ |
694 |
|
|
$ |
149,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale during 2009 were $84.1 million and
resulted in gross realized gains of $4.3 million. For the year ended December 31, 2008, proceeds
from available-for-sale securities amounted to $18.5 million and resulted in realized gains of $457
thousand. There were no sales of securities in 2007. |
|
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities available-for-sale (in
thousands) that are not determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, by contractual maturity
at December 31, 2009 are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities
because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties. Equity securities do not have contractual maturities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
|
$ |
1,025 |
|
Due after one year but less than five years |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
Due after five years but less than ten years |
|
|
9,569 |
|
|
|
9,557 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
147,652 |
|
|
|
146,806 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
2,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
162,204 |
|
|
$ |
161,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
|
|
Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses (in thousands) at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the
individual securities have been in a continuous loss position is as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Agency securities |
|
$ |
4,711 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,711 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
69,078 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,078 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73,821 |
|
|
$ |
1,457 |
|
|
$ |
1,097 |
|
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
$ |
74,918 |
|
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
$ |
2,713 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,713 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,994 |
|
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
$ |
4,146 |
|
|
$ |
694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
Investment securities classified as available-for-sale are generally evaluated for OTTI in
accordance with ASC 320, Investment Debt and Equity Securities. |
|
|
In determining OTTI, management considers many factors, including (1) the length of time and the
extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions,
and (4) whether the Company has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will
be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an
other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is
based on the information available to management at a point in time. |
|
|
When OTTI occurs, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity
intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current period credit loss. If an entity
intends to sell or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current period credit loss, the OTTI shall be
recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investments amortized cost basis
and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and
it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period loss, the OTTI shall be separated into
the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of
the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows
expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to
other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous
amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of
the investment. |
|
|
The unrealized loss positions on debt securities at December 31, 2009 were directly related to
interest rate movements as there is minimal credit risk exposure in these investments. Debt
securities with unrealized loss positions at December 31, 2009 included one agency security and 21
agency mortgage-backed securities. Management does not believe that any of these debt securities
were other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2009. |
F-21
|
|
In accordance with SAB Topic 5M, our impairment analysis considered all available evidence
including the length of time and the extent to which the market value of each security was less
than cost, the financial condition of the issuer of each equity security (based upon financial
statements of the issuers), and the near term prospects of each issuer, as well as our intent and
ability to retain these investments for a sufficient period of time to allow for any anticipated
recovery in their respective market values. During 2009 and 2008, equity securities with an
amortized cost basis of $5.4 million and $613 thousand, respectively, were determined to be
other-than-temporarily impaired. Impairment losses of $2.5 million and $561 thousand were
recognized through noninterest income during 2009 and 2008, respectively. An additional $190
thousand was included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the equity section of the balance
sheet as of December 31, 2009. Management has evaluated the unrealized losses associated with the
remaining equity securities as of December 31, 2009 and, in managements opinion, the unrealized
losses are temporary and it is our intention to hold these securities until their value recovers. A
rollforward of the cumulative other-than-temporary impairment losses (in thousands) recognized in
earnings for all debt securities is as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
561 |
|
Loss where impairment was not previously recognized |
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys investment in FHLB stock totaled $19.7 million at December 31, 2009. FHLB stock is
generally viewed as a long-term investment and as a restricted investment security and is carried
at cost as there is no market for the stock other than the FHLB or member institutions. Therefore,
when evaluating FHLB stock for impairment, its value is based on ultimate recoverability of the par
value rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. Despite the FHLBs change in policy
relating to repurchases of excess capital stock in 2009, the Company does not consider this
investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2009, and no impairment has been
recognized. |
|
|
Investment securities at estimated fair value (in thousands) that were pledged to secure deposits
or outstanding borrowings or were pledged to secure potential future borrowings at December 31,
2009 and 2008 were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Public deposits |
|
$ |
34,219 |
|
|
$ |
32,116 |
|
Treasury, tax, and loan deposits |
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
3,605 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
21,550 |
|
|
|
26,528 |
|
Federal Reserve Bank borrowings |
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
7,755 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
24,174 |
|
|
|
22,923 |
|
Housing and Urban Development |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
86,677 |
|
|
$ |
93,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses |
|
|
The Company grants commercial, construction, real estate, and consumer loans to customers
throughout its lending areas. A substantial portion of debtors abilities to honor their contracts
is dependent upon the real estate and general economic environment of the lending area. Overdrafts
in the amount of $399 thousand and $332 thousand as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
were reclassified from deposits to loans. |
F-22
|
|
Major classifications of loans (in thousands) at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
361,256 |
|
|
$ |
451,426 |
|
Construction |
|
|
757,702 |
|
|
|
897,288 |
|
Real estate commercial mortgage |
|
|
740,570 |
|
|
|
673,351 |
|
Real estate residential mortgage |
|
|
524,853 |
|
|
|
528,760 |
|
Installment loans to individuals |
|
|
42,858 |
|
|
|
50,085 |
|
Deferred loan fees and related costs |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,426,692 |
|
|
$ |
2,599,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets (in thousands) at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,219 |
|
Nonaccrual loans, including nonaccrual impaired loans |
|
|
248,303 |
|
|
|
32,885 |
|
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets |
|
|
8,867 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets |
|
$ |
257,170 |
|
|
$ |
41,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated gross interest income that would have been recorded if the foregoing nonaccrual loans had
remained current in accordance with their contractual terms totaled $44.2 million, $99 thousand,
and $164 thousand in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
Information on impaired loans (in thousands) at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 is as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Impaired loans for which an allowance has been provided |
|
$ |
331,532 |
|
|
$ |
2,161 |
|
|
$ |
1,698 |
|
Impaired loans for which no allowance has been provided |
|
|
137,536 |
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
469,068 |
|
|
$ |
4,291 |
|
|
$ |
1,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance provided for impaired loans, included in the
allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
91,488 |
|
|
$ |
545 |
|
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance in impaired loans |
|
$ |
215,363 |
|
|
$ |
3,883 |
|
|
$ |
1,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized from impaired loans |
|
$ |
17,440 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides information (in thousands) related to the loan category and method
used to measure impairment at December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method Used to |
|
Impaired Loans |
|
Loan Category |
|
Measure Impairment |
|
Outstanding |
|
1-4 family residential construction |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
$ |
20,851 |
|
Other construction and development |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
237,313 |
|
Secured by farm land |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
1,318 |
|
Secured by 1-4 family, revolving |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
6,018 |
|
Secured by 1-4 family, 1st lien |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
32,532 |
|
Secured by 1-4 family, junior lien |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
1,502 |
|
Secured by multifamily |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
8,137 |
|
Secured by nonfarm nonresidential
(owner occupied) |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
29,309 |
|
Secured by nonfarm nonresidential
(non-owner occupied) |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
75,947 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
56,081 |
|
Other consumer loans to individuals |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
469,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, loans classified as troubled debt restructurings were $73.5 million, all
of which are considered impaired and included in the disclosure above. Of this amount, $56.6
million was accruing and $16.9 million was non-accruing at December 31, 2009. Troubled debt
restructurings in nonaccrual status are returned to accrual status after a period of performance
under which the borrower demonstrates the ability and willingness to repay the loan. None of the
nonaccrual troubled debt restructurings were returned to accrual status during the year ended
December 31, 2009. There were no troubled debt restructurings as of December 31, 2008. |
|
|
A loan is considered impaired when management believes the principal is uncollectible. For
collateral dependent impaired loans, impairment is measured based upon the fair value of the
underlying collateral. Management considers a loan to be collateral dependent when repayment of the
loan is expected solely from the sale or liquidation of the underlying collateral. The Companys
policy is to charge off collateral dependent impaired loans at the earlier of foreclosure,
repossession, or liquidation at the point it becomes 180 days past due. The Companys policy is to
reduce the carrying value of the loan down to the estimated fair value of the collateral less
estimated costs to sell through charge off to the allowance for loan losses. For loans that are not
collateral dependent, impairment is measured using discounted cash flows. Total impaired loans were
$469.1 million at December 31, 2009, the majority of which were considered collateral dependent,
and therefore, measured at the fair value of the underlying collateral. |
|
|
Impaired loans for which no allowance is provided totaled $137.5 million at December 31, 2009.
Loans written down to their estimated fair value of collateral less the costs to sell account for
$22.1 of the impaired loans for which no allowance has been provided as of December 31, 2009. The
average age of appraisals for these loans is 0.93 years. The remaining impaired loans for which no
allowance is provided are fully covered by the value of the collateral, and therefore, no loss is
expected on these loans. |
F-23
|
|
Transactions affecting the allowance for loan losses (in thousands) for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
51,218 |
|
|
$ |
5,043 |
|
|
$ |
3,911 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
134,223 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
Acquired through SFC acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired through GFH acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(53,536 |
) |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
132,697 |
|
|
$ |
51,218 |
|
|
$ |
5,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the opinion of management, based on conditions reasonably known to them, the allowance was
adequate at December 31, 2009. The allowance may be increased or decreased in the future based on
loan balances outstanding, changes in internally generated credit quality ratings of the loan
portfolio, changes in general economic conditions, or other risk factors. |
(7) |
|
Accounting for Certain Loans Acquired in a Transfer |
|
|
ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, requires acquired
loans to be recorded at fair value and prohibits carrying over valuation allowances when initially
accounting for acquired impaired loans. Loans carried at fair value, mortgage loans held for sale,
and loans to borrowers in good standing under revolving credit agreements are excluded from the
scope of this pronouncement. It limits the yield that may be accreted to the excess of the
undiscounted expected cash flows over the investors initial investment in the loan. The excess of
the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows may not be recognized as an adjustment of
yield. Subsequent increases in cash flows expected to be collected are recognized prospectively
through an adjustment of the loans yield over its remaining life. Decreases in expected cash flows
are recognized as impairments. |
|
|
The Company acquired loans pursuant to the acquisition of GFH in December 2008. The Company
reviewed the loan portfolio at acquisition to determine whether there was evidence of deterioration
of credit quality since origination and if it was probable that it will be unable to collect all
amounts due according to the loans contractual terms. When both conditions existed, the Company
accounted for each loan individually, considered expected prepayments, and estimated the amount and
timing of discounted expected principal, interest, and other cash flows (expected at acquisition)
for each loan. The Company determined the excess of the loans scheduled contractual principal and
contractual interest payments over all cash flows expected at acquisition as an amount that should
not be accreted into interest income (non-accretable difference). The remaining amount,
representing the excess of the loans cash flows expected to be collected over the amount paid, is
accreted into interest income over the remaining life of the loan (accretable yield). |
|
|
Over the life of the loan, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected.
The Company evaluates at the balance sheet date whether the present value of its loans determined
using the effective interest rates has decreased, and if so, the Company establishes a valuation
allowance for the loan. Valuation allowances for acquired loans reflect only those losses incurred
after acquisition; that is, the present value of cash flows expected at acquisition that are not
expected to be collected. Valuation allowances are established only subsequent to our acquisition
of the loans. For loans that are not accounted for as debt securities, the present value of any
subsequent increase in the loans or pools actual cash flows or cash flows expected to be
collected is used first to reverse any existing valuation allowance for that loan. For any
remaining increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company adjusts the amount of
accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loans remaining life. The Company does
not have any such loans that were accounted for as debt securities. |
|
|
Loans that were acquired in the GFH acquisition for which there was evidence of deterioration of
credit quality since origination and for which it was probable that all contractually required
payments would not be made as scheduled had an outstanding balance of $88.0 million and a carrying
amount of $78.2 million at December 31, 2009. The carrying amount of these loans is included in the
balance sheet amount of loans receivable at December 31, 2009. Of these loans, $58.2 million have
experienced further deterioration since the acquisition date and are included in the impaired loan
amounts disclosed in Note 4. The following table depicts the accretable yield (in thousands) at the
beginning and end of the period. |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
(2,134 |
) |
Disposals |
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
Additions |
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
(8) |
|
Derivative Instruments |
|
|
At December 31, 2009, the Company had rate lock commitments to originate mortgage loans in the
amount of $17.2 million and loans held for sale of $12.6 million. At December 31, 2008, the Company
had rate lock commitments to originate mortgage loans in the amount of $17.1 million and loans held
for sale of $5.1 million. The Company entered into corresponding commitments with third party
investors to sell loans of approximately $29.8 million in 2009 and $23.6 million in 2008. Under the
contractual relationship with these investors, the Company is obligated to sell the loans only if
the loans close. No other obligation exists. As a result of these contractual relationships with
these investors, the Company is not exposed to losses nor will it realize gains related to its rate
lock commitments due to changes in interest rates. |
(9) |
|
Premises, Equipment, and Leases |
|
|
Premises and equipment (in thousands) at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
31,335 |
|
|
$ |
26,357 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
58,177 |
|
|
|
59,731 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
|
3,224 |
|
Equipment, furniture, and fixtures |
|
|
14,828 |
|
|
|
15,101 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,758 |
|
|
|
107,181 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(10,246 |
) |
|
|
(5,846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
97,512 |
|
|
$ |
101,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and leasehold amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and
2007 was $5.5 million, $1.4 million, and $886 thousand, respectively. |
|
|
The Company leases land and buildings upon which certain of its operating facilities and financial
center facilities are located. These leases expire at various dates through August 31, 2049.
Additionally, the Company has the option to purchase the land upon which the building where some of
our operations occur at the end of the twenty-year lease term at a cost of $300 thousand. |
|
|
Various facilities and equipment are leased under noncancellable operating leases with initial
remaining terms in excess of one year with options for renewal. In addition to minimum rents,
certain leases have escalation clauses and include provisions for additional payments to cover
taxes, insurance, and maintenance. The effects of the scheduled rent increases, which are included
in the minimum lease payments, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Rental
expense was $3.8 million for 2009 compared to $1.1 million for 2008 and $907 thousand for 2007. |
F-25
|
|
Future minimum lease payments (in thousands), by year and in the aggregate, under
noncancellable operating leases at December 31, 2009 were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
2,963 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,631 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2,448 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,383 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2,255 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
18,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has entered into contracts as lessor for excess office space. Future minimum lease
payments receivable (in thousands) under noncancelable leasing arrangements at December 31, 2009
were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
156 |
|
2011 |
|
|
94 |
|
2012 |
|
|
92 |
|
2013 |
|
|
92 |
|
2014 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite life are subject to impairment testing at
least annually or more often if events or circumstances suggest potential impairment. Other
acquired intangible assets determined to have a finite life are amortized over their estimated
useful life in a manner that best reflects the economic benefits of the intangible asset.
Intangible assets with a finite life are periodically reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment.
ASC 350 identifies a two-step impairment test that should be used to test for impairment and
measure the amount of the impairment loss to be recognized. The first step involves comparing the
fair value of the reporting unit with the carrying value of the reporting unit. If the carrying
value of the reporting unit exceeds fair value of the reporting unit, a potential impairment may
exist. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill to the
carrying amount of that goodwill. The excess of the carrying amount over the fair value is an
impairment of goodwill. |
|
|
|
As of May 31, 2009, the Company, in accordance to ASC 350, conducted an impairment test on the
goodwill from the SFC acquisition related to Shore. Managements review of goodwill indicated an
impairment of $27.9 million. Also in the second quarter of 2009, the goodwill associated with the
GFH merger was tested for impairment. Our testing indicated that there was no impairment of the
goodwill related to the GFH merger as of June 30, 2009. The differing result of the GFH impairment
testing from the SFC testing was due to several factors including the relative value of
consideration paid for GFH (only five months had elapsed since the GFH merger, and, thus, fair
values were more current than for SFC) and the market prices paid in acquisitions had already
fallen substantially prior to the GFH acquisition. Annual impairment testing of the GFH goodwill
subsequently was conducted on its planned schedule as of October 31, 2009. Due in part to a decline
in the Companys stock price and, thus, its market capitalization, and its further deterioration in
the fair value of the Companys assets, the assessment reflected impairment of the entire $56.9
million in goodwill associated with the GFH acquisition. The non-cash loss on impairment of
goodwill was recorded as a noninterest expense in the statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2009. |
F-26
|
|
A summary of goodwill and intangible assets (in thousands) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 is
as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Intangible assets subject to future amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
$ |
8,105 |
|
|
$ |
1,703 |
|
|
$ |
8,105 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
Employment contract intangible |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
1,957 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Insurance book of business intangible |
|
|
6,450 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets subject to future
amortization |
|
|
15,685 |
|
|
|
2,846 |
|
|
|
16,062 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill and intangible assets |
|
$ |
15,685 |
|
|
$ |
2,846 |
|
|
$ |
98,733 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no intangible assets as of December 31, 2007. |
|
|
The aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets with finite lives for the year ended
December 31, 2009 was $2.5 million, compared to $366 thousand for 2008; there was no amortization
expense for intangible assets in 2007. The estimated aggregate annual amortization expense (in
thousands) for the years subsequent to December 31, 2009 is as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,979 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,945 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,765 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,392 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,026 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
4,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill (in thousands) for the year ended December 31, 2009 are
as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
82,671 |
|
Impairment losses |
|
|
(84,837 |
) |
Adjustments |
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11) |
|
Foreclosed Real Estate and Repossessed Assets |
|
|
Foreclosed assets are presented net of an allowance for losses. An analysis of the allowance for
losses (in thousands) on foreclosed assets is as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Provision for losses |
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(687 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
356 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
|
|
Expenses (in thousands) applicable to foreclosed assets include the following. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Net loss on sales of real estate |
|
$ |
161 |
|
Provision for losses |
|
|
1,043 |
|
Operating expenses, net of rental income |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no foreclosed asset expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. |
|
|
The scheduled maturities of time deposits (in thousands) at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as
follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Time Deposits |
|
|
Time Deposits |
|
|
Time Deposits |
|
|
Time Deposits |
|
|
|
Less than $100 |
|
|
$100 or More |
|
|
Less than $100 |
|
|
$100 or More |
|
Maturity of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 months or less |
|
$ |
242,970 |
|
|
$ |
47,514 |
|
|
$ |
357,126 |
|
|
$ |
110,968 |
|
3 months - 6 months |
|
|
157,105 |
|
|
|
49,791 |
|
|
|
144,912 |
|
|
|
91,286 |
|
6 months - 12 months |
|
|
286,701 |
|
|
|
148,037 |
|
|
|
237,761 |
|
|
|
117,113 |
|
1 year - 2 years |
|
|
165,255 |
|
|
|
85,786 |
|
|
|
67,170 |
|
|
|
43,298 |
|
2 years - 3 years |
|
|
18,837 |
|
|
|
13,771 |
|
|
|
29,209 |
|
|
|
17,797 |
|
3 years - 4 years |
|
|
8,389 |
|
|
|
5,951 |
|
|
|
13,845 |
|
|
|
10,546 |
|
4 years - 5 years |
|
|
8,936 |
|
|
|
5,895 |
|
|
|
7,761 |
|
|
|
3,528 |
|
Over 5 years |
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
889,788 |
|
|
$ |
356,845 |
|
|
$ |
858,787 |
|
|
$ |
394,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total brokered deposits were $386.4 million and $484.8 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Of these brokered funds $47.6 million and $245.3 million were interest bearing demand
deposits and the remaining $338.8 million and $239.5 million were time deposits at December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. |
|
|
As a member of FHLB, the Company may borrow funds based on criteria established by the FHLB. The
FHLB may call these borrowings prior to maturity if the collateral balance falls below the
borrowing level. The borrowing arrangements with the FHLB could be either short- or long- term
depending on our related costs and needs. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had loans from
the FHLB totaling $228.2 million and $279.1 million, respectively. Interest only is payable on a
monthly basis until maturity. The carrying value of maturities of FHLB borrowings at December 31,
2009 was as follows (in thousands). |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
11,685 |
|
2011 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
196,247 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
5,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
228,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB borrowings carry a weighted average interest rate of 4.06% and are all convertible at FHLBs
option on the interest payment dates to either one month or three month LIBOR except for five fixed
rate advances that total $32.5 million. The FHLB borrowings were collateralized with residential
real estate loans, commercial real estate loans, and investment securities. During 2009 two FHLB
borrowings were paid off prior to maturity. An |
F-28
|
|
extinguishment of debt charge in the amount of $2.0 million was incurred in association with
these early pay-offs. The principal balance due, excluding acquisition fair value adjustments, of
FHLB borrowings in aggregate, were $219.8 million at December 31, 2009. |
|
|
The Company acquired two reverse repurchase agreements in the GFH acquisition. Each repurchase
agreement has an original principal balance of $10.0 million and is collateralized with
mortgage-backed securities with a similar fair market value. The first repurchase agreement has a
five-year term with an interest rate fixed at 4.99% until it is repurchased by the counterparty on
August 1, 2011. The second repurchase agreement has a seven-year term with a repurchase date of
August 1, 2013 (the 2013 Agreement). The interest rate of this agreement is a variable rate of
9.85% minus three-month LIBOR (0.25% at December 31, 2009), not to exceed 5.85%. The applicable
interest rate in effect at December 31, 2009 was 5.85%. Both agreements are callable by the
counterparty on a quarterly basis and the 2013 Agreement became immediately callable as a result of
BOHR not maintaining well-capitalized status with the FDIC. The carrying value of these agreements
as of December 31, 2009 was $21.0 million. |
|
|
As part of the GFH acquisition, the Company acquired four placements of trust preferred securities
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Interest |
|
Redeemable |
|
Mandatory |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Rate |
|
On Or After |
|
Redemption |
Gateway Capital
Statutory Trust I |
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 3.10% |
|
September 17, 2008 |
|
September 17, 2033 |
Gateway Capital
Statutory Trust II |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 2.65% |
|
July 17, 2009 |
|
June 17, 2034 |
Gateway Capital
Statutory Trust III |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 1.50% |
|
May 30, 2011 |
|
May 30, 2036 |
Gateway Capital
Statutory Trust IV |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 1.55% |
|
July 30, 2012 |
|
July 30, 2037 |
|
|
LIBOR in the table above refers to 3 month LIBOR. In all four trusts, the trust issuer has invested
the total proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities in junior subordinated
deferrable interest debentures issued by the Company. The trust preferred securities pay cumulative
cash distributions quarterly at an annual rate, reset quarterly. The dividends paid to holders of
the trust preferred securities, which are recorded as interest expense, are deductible for income
tax purposes. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the trust preferred securities
through the combined operation of the debentures and other related documents. The Companys
obligation under the guarantee is unsecured and subordinate to senior and subordinated indebtedness
of the Company. The carrying value of these debentures in aggregate as of December 31, 2009 was
$28.3 million. The Company has suspended the payment of dividends on all four issues of trust
preferred securities, however, at year-end 2009 all payments had been made in accordance with
contractual terms. |
|
|
The Company borrowed $28.0 million from another bank in 2008. This borrowing had a variable
interest rate of prime minus 1% with a floor of 4% (4% at December 31, 2008) and was paid in full
during 2009. |
(14) |
|
Preferred Stock and Warrant |
|
|
In conjunction with the acquisition of GFH, the Company issued 23,266 shares of Series A
Non-Convertible Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (Series A Preferred Stock) and 37,550
shares of Series B Non-Convertible Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred
Stock). Both series are non-voting except as may otherwise be required under applicable law. |
|
|
The Series A Preferred Stock has no par value and a liquidation amount equal to $1,000 per share.
Dividends are payable quarterly, if declared, at an annual rate of 8.75%, and are non-cumulative.
Since January 1, 2009, the Company had the right and option to redeem all or a portion of the
Series A Preferred Stock at the rate of $1,000 per share. At December 31, 2009, none of this stock
has been redeemed. |
|
|
The Series B Preferred Stock has no par value and a liquidation amount equal to $1,000 per share.
Dividends are payable quarterly, if declared, at a rate of 12%, and are non-cumulative. Since
October 1, 2009, the Company had the right and option to redeem all or a portion of the Series B
Preferred Stock at the rate of $1,000 per share. At December 31, 2009, none of this stock has been
redeemed. |
F-29
|
|
On December 31, 2008, the Company issued 80,347 shares of Series C Fixed Rate Cumulative
Preferred Stock (Series C Preferred Stock) to the United States Department of the Treasury (U.S.
Treasury) for an aggregate price of $80.3 million. The shares were issued in connection with the
Companys participation in the Capital Purchase Program (CPP) as authorized under the Emergency
Stabilization Act of 2008. The Series C Preferred Stock has no par value and a liquidation amount
equal to $1,000 per share. The Series C Preferred Stock pays cumulative dividends at an annual rate
of 5% for the first five years and 9% thereafter. This Preferred Stock is redeemable at par plus
accrued and unpaid dividends subject to the approval of the Companys primary regulators. |
|
|
In addition, the Company issued to the U.S. Treasury a warrant to purchase 1,325,858 shares of the
Companys common stock at an initial exercise price of $9.09 per share. The warrant is immediately
exercisable and provides for the adjustment of the exercise price and the number of shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise pursuant to customary anti-dilution provisions, such as stock
splits or distributions of securities or other assets to holders of common stock and upon certain
issuances of common stock at or below a specified price relative to the then-current market price
of common stock. The warrant expires ten years from the issuance date. The U.S. Treasury has agreed
not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the
warrant. |
|
|
Shares of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock, and the Series C Preferred
Stock have priority over the Companys common stock with regard to the payment of dividends. As
such, the Company may not pay dividends on, or repurchase, redeem, or otherwise acquire for
consideration shares of its common stock unless dividends for these classes of Preferred Stock are
current. |
|
|
The Company took actions during the fourth quarter that were intended to preserve capital. On
October 30, 2009, we announced that we would suspend dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock and
Series B Preferred Stock, which required us to also suspend dividends on our Series C Preferred
Stock under applicable law. As a result, on November 17, 2009, we notified the Treasury of our
intent to defer the payment of our regulatory quarterly cash dividend on our Series C Preferred
Stock issued to the Treasury in connection with our participation in the TARP CPP. If we miss six
quarterly dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, the Treasury will have the right to
appoint two directors to our board of directors until all accrued but unpaid dividends have been
paid. We cannot pay dividends on our outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock or our common
stock until we have paid in full all deferred distributions on our trust preferred securities. As
of December 31, 2009, dividends accrued but not paid for Series C Preferred Stock totaled $1.5
million. |
(15) |
|
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk |
|
|
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying
degrees, elements of credit risk which have not been recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.
The contract amount of these instruments reflects the extent of the Companys involvement or
credit risk. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional
obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. Contractual amounts (in thousands) at
December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
326,121 |
|
|
$ |
523,179 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
8,590 |
|
|
|
29,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
334,711 |
|
|
$ |
552,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation
of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or
other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are
expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a
case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon
extension of credit, is based on managements credit evaluation of the counter party. Collateral
held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment,
income-producing commercial properties, and real estate. |
F-30
|
|
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the
performance of the contractual obligation by a customer to a third party. The majority of these
guarantees extend until satisfactory completion of the customers contractual obligation.
Management does not anticipate any material losses will arise from additional funding of the
aforementioned commitments or letters of credit. |
|
|
Defined Contribution Plan |
|
|
The Company has defined contribution 401(k) plans at both of its subsidiary banks and one for the
former GFH employees. Under the BOHR 401(k) plan, all employees who are 21 years of age and have
completed one year of service are eligible to participate. Participants may contribute up to 20% of
their compensation, subject to statutory limitations and the Company matches 100% of the employees
contributions up to 4% of salary. Under the Shore 401(k) plan, all employees who are 18 years of
age and have completed 3 months of service are eligible to participate. Participants may contribute
up to 15% of their compensation and the Company matches 100% up to 3% of the employees
contributions and 50% of the next 3%. Former Gateway Bank employees who are 18 years of age and
have completed three months of service are eligible to participate in that 401(k) plan, and the
Company matches 100% of the employees contributions up to 6% of salary. The Company may also make
additional discretionary contributions to the plans. Participants are fully vested in their
contributions and the Companys match immediately and become fully vested in the Companys
discretionary contributions after 3 years of service. |
|
|
The Company made no discretionary contributions in 2009 compared to $209 thousand and $119 thousand
for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company also made matching
contributions of $1.2 million, $257 thousand, and $202 thousand for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The Company offers its stock as an investment option under the
BOHR 401(k) plan. |
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (SERP) |
|
|
The Company has entered into SERPs with several key officers. Under these agreements, all but four
of twelve officers are each eligible to receive an annual benefit payable in fifteen installments
each equal to $50 thousand following the attainment of their Plan Retirement Date. Two of the other
four officers are eligible to receive an annual benefit payable in fifteen installments each equal
to 50% of their Benefit Computation Base following the attainment of his Plan Retirement Date. The
remaining two officers are eligible to receive an annual benefit payable in fifteen installments
each equal to 70% of their Benefit Computation Base following the attainment of their Plan
Retirement Date. The Benefit Computation Base is calculated as the average compensation from the
Company over the three consecutive completed calendar years just prior to the year of retirement or
termination. The Company recognizes expense each year related to these agreements based on the
present value of the benefits expected to be provided to the employees and any beneficiaries. The
change in benefit obligation and funded status (in thousands) for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008, and 2007 were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
$ |
3,915 |
|
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
Acquired in GFH acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Terminations |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year |
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
3,915 |
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status |
|
$ |
(4,874 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,915 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
|
|
The amount of the funded status is the accrued benefit cost included in other liabilities on
the balance sheet. The amounts (in thousands) recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Accrued benefit cost included in other liabilities |
|
$ |
(4,874 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of net periodic benefit cost (in thousands) for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008, and 2007 were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
826 |
|
|
$ |
516 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Terminations |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
959 |
|
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic pension
benefit at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were as follows. The rate of compensation increase
only applies to the officer agreements with a Benefit Computation Base. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Discount rate |
|
6.00% - 7.00% |
|
7.00% |
|
7.00% |
Rate of compensation increase |
|
3.00% - 5.75% |
|
3.00% - 5.00% |
|
3.00% |
|
|
The Company recognizes expense each year related to the SERPs based on the present value of the
benefits expected to be provided to the employees and any beneficiaries. The Company does not
expect to make contributions to fund the supplemental retirement agreements in 2010 and made no
contributions to the plan in 2009. The plans are unfunded and there are no plan assets. As of
December 31, 2009, the following benefit payments (in thousands) are expected to be paid over the
next ten years. |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
359 |
|
2011 |
|
|
359 |
|
2012 |
|
|
359 |
|
2013 |
|
|
359 |
|
2014 |
|
|
359 |
|
2015 -2019 |
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has an Executive Savings Plan with certain officers whereby an initial contribution
made by the officers will be matched each year by the Company as long as the officers employment
continues and the Company is profitable. Contributions into the plan may be used to purchase
employer stock or may be placed in savings accounts for the benefit of each individual participant
and earn interest at the highest rate currently being paid on a Company certificate of deposit.
Company contributions to the Executive Savings Plan during 2008 and 2007 were $242 thousand and
$268 thousand, respectively. No contributions were made to the plan during 2009. |
|
|
Board of Directors Retirement Agreement |
|
|
The Company has entered into retirement agreements with certain members of the Board of Directors.
Participants are eligible for compensation under the plan upon the sixth anniversary of the
participants first board meeting. Benefits are to be paid in monthly installments commencing at
retirement and ending upon the death, disability, or |
F-32
|
|
mutual consent of both parties to the agreement. Under the plan, the participants continue to
serve the Company after retirement by performing certain duties as outlined in the plan document.
During 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Company expensed $72 thousand, $69 thousand, and $63 thousand,
respectively, related to this plan. |
(17) |
|
Stock Compensation Plans |
|
|
During 2008 and 2007, the Company authorized the grant of options to employees and directors for
18,000 and 34,968 shares, respectively, of the Companys common stock under stock compensation
plans that have been approved by the Companys shareholders. During 2009, no options were granted.
All outstanding options granted have original terms that range from 5 to 10 years and are either
fully vested and exercisable at the date of grant or vested ratably over 3 to 10 years. During
2008, the Company acquired 216,183 stock options as part of the Shore Merger and 1,185,018 stock
options as part of the Gateway Merger. A summary of the Companys stock option activity and related
information is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
929,970 |
|
|
$ |
9.19 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
34,968 |
|
|
|
12.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(93,599 |
) |
|
|
7.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(10,992 |
) |
|
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
|
|
10.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
858,156 |
|
|
|
9.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired through SFC acquisition |
|
|
216,183 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired through GFH acquisition |
|
|
1,185,018 |
|
|
|
14.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
11.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(112,964 |
) |
|
|
5.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(2,750 |
) |
|
|
12.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(65,637 |
) |
|
|
113.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,096,006 |
|
|
|
11.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(86,243 |
) |
|
|
7.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(20,834 |
) |
|
|
11.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(568,716 |
) |
|
|
11.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,420,213 |
|
|
$ |
12.60 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,307,168 |
|
|
$ |
12.43 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and the
options exercised, including the total intrinsic value and cash received, for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Expense recognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to stock options |
|
$ |
179,304 |
|
|
$ |
86,156 |
|
|
$ |
160,229 |
|
Related to share awards |
|
|
451,228 |
|
|
|
63,452 |
|
|
|
177,021 |
|
Related tax benefit |
|
|
164,907 |
|
|
|
29,014 |
|
|
|
115,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of options exercised: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New shares |
|
|
86,243 |
|
|
|
112,282 |
|
|
|
76,700 |
|
Previously acquired shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
16,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intrinsic value of options exercised |
|
$ |
31,533 |
|
|
$ |
642,619 |
|
|
$ |
487,004 |
|
Cash received from options exercised |
|
|
613,209 |
|
|
|
571,222 |
|
|
|
476,076 |
|
F-33
|
|
Information pertaining to fully vested options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31,
2009 is as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ranges of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number of Options |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Number of Options |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Prices |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
$ |
3.09 - 5.05 |
|
|
|
73,340 |
|
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
$ |
4.17 |
|
|
|
73,340 |
|
|
$ |
4.17 |
|
|
|
|
6.53 - 8.84 |
|
|
|
312,311 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
8.04 |
|
|
|
312,311 |
|
|
|
8.04 |
|
|
|
|
9.11 - 10.65 |
|
|
|
411,683 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
|
|
|
9.75 |
|
|
|
407,663 |
|
|
|
9.74 |
|
|
|
|
12.00 - 14.33 |
|
|
|
210,887 |
|
|
|
6.79 |
|
|
|
12.20 |
|
|
|
130,954 |
|
|
|
12.30 |
|
|
|
|
19.43 - 22.07 |
|
|
|
358,562 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
|
20.05 |
|
|
|
329,467 |
|
|
|
19.91 |
|
|
|
|
23.60 - 24.67 |
|
|
|
53,433 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
|
|
|
24.22 |
|
|
|
53,433 |
|
|
|
24.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3.09 - 24.67 |
|
|
|
1,420,216 |
|
|
$ |
4.30 |
|
|
$ |
12.60 |
|
|
|
1,307,168 |
|
|
$ |
12.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has 786,535 shares available under shareholder approved stock incentive plans. As of
December 31, 2009, there was $384 thousand of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested
stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.51 years. |
|
|
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted and acquired through mergers
during 2008 and 2007 was $1.86 and $2.34, respectively. The following assumptions were used to
arrive at the fair value of stock options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
2.25% - 3.34% |
|
4.36% - 4.68% |
Volatility |
|
34.30% - 40.56% |
|
18.40% - 27.27% |
Dividend yield |
|
3.39% - 5.04% |
|
3.33% - 3.43% |
Expected term (in years) |
|
0.10 - 8.30 |
|
1.90 - 9.50 |
|
|
Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions. Because the Companys
employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options
and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value
estimate, in managements opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a representative
single measure of the fair value at which transactions may occur. Expected volatility is based on
historical volatility of the Companys traded shares. The expected term is calculated by the
lattice option pricing model using assumptions regarding the contractual term of the stock options,
vesting periods, the exercise price to market stock price multiple experienced by the Company, and
the historical employee exit rate. |
|
|
The Company has granted non-vested shares to certain directors and employees as part of incentive
programs. These non-vested shares have original vesting schedules that range from one to nine years
and are expensed over the same schedules. |
F-34
|
|
A summary of the Companys non-vested share activity and related information was as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
47,176 |
|
|
$ |
10.76 |
|
Granted |
|
|
20,364 |
|
|
|
12.12 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(4,500 |
) |
|
|
10.76 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(8,500 |
) |
|
|
10.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
54,540 |
|
|
|
11.23 |
|
Granted |
|
|
32,908 |
|
|
|
8.50 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(37,623 |
) |
|
|
11.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
49,825 |
|
|
|
9.49 |
|
Granted |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
8.54 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(33,756 |
) |
|
|
8.85 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(4,152 |
) |
|
|
8.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
21,917 |
|
|
$ |
10.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, there was $175 thousand of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested share awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
3.79 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008,
and 2007 was $164 thousand, $418 thousand, and $57 thousand, respectively. |
(18) |
|
Employment Agreements |
|
|
The Company and its subsidiaries have entered into employment agreements with 26 officers to ensure
a stable and competent management base. Two of the agreements expire in 2010, four expire in 2011,
eighteen expire in 2012, one expires in 2013, and one expires in 2014. The agreements will
automatically renew at the end of their terms unless the officer is notified in writing prior to
expiration. Among other things, the agreements provide for severance benefits payable to the
officers upon termination of employment following a change of control in the Company. |
(19) |
|
Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase Plan |
|
|
In order to raise additional capital, the Company has a Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash
Purchase Plan. The plan enables shareholders to receive cash payment or reinvest their dividends.
In connection with this plan, for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company entered the open
market and acquired 68,748 shares at an average price of $7.72 per share. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, the Company did not issue any shares in connection with the dividend
reinvestment plan. The stock purchased through the plan directly from the Company is valued at the
weighted average sales price of the Companys common stock in transactions occurring during the 60
calendar days immediately prior to the purchase date. The purchase price of shares purchased on the
open market is the current market price of the shares purchased on the applicable purchase dates. |
F-35
|
|
A summary of noninterest expense (in thousands) for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and
2007 is as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
42,285 |
|
|
$ |
11,518 |
|
|
$ |
9,954 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
9,044 |
|
|
|
2,261 |
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
5,368 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
84,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
5,661 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
4,735 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2,546 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bank franchise tax |
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
Telephone and postage |
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Directors and regional board fees |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
Stationery, printing, and office supplies |
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
ATM and VISA check card |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,820 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses |
|
$ |
170,795 |
|
|
$ |
20,987 |
|
|
$ |
15,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21) |
|
Business Segment Reporting |
|
|
The Company has two community banks, BOHR and Shore, which provide loan and deposit services
throughout their 60 locations in Virginia, North Carolina, and Maryland. In addition to its banking
operations, the Company has three other reportable segments: Mortgage, Investment, and Insurance.
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary
of significant accounting policies. Net income (loss) below is shown prior to corporate overhead
allocation. Intersegment transactions are recorded at cost and eliminated as part of the
consolidated process. Because of the interrelationships between the segments, the information is
not indicative of how the segments would perform if they operated as independent entities. The
following table shows certain financial information (in thousands) at December 31, 2009 for each
segment and in total. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Insurance |
|
Total assets at
December 31, 2009 as
restated |
|
$ |
2,919,576 |
|
|
$ |
(303,100 |
) |
|
$ |
3,197,510 |
|
|
$ |
13,599 |
|
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
$ |
10,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2009 as
restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
105,151 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
104,745 |
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
(134,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
(loss) after provision
for loan losses |
|
|
(29,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,478 |
) |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
22,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,428 |
|
|
|
4,642 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
4,901 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
170,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,304 |
|
|
|
3,686 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
4,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before
income taxes |
|
|
(177,542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179,354 |
) |
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
23,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,300 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(201,450 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(202,654 |
) |
|
$ |
903 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had no reportable business segments at December 31, 2008 and 2007. |
F-36
(22) |
|
Restrictions on Loans and Dividends from Subsidiaries |
|
|
Regulatory agencies place certain restrictions on dividends paid and loans or advances made by the
Banks to the Company. The amount of dividends the Banks may pay to the Company, without prior
approval, is limited to current year earnings plus retained net profits for the two preceding
years. Under these restrictions, at December 31, 2009, the Banks had no ability to pay dividends
without prior approval. |
|
|
Loans and advances from the Banks to the Company are limited based on regulatory capital. As of
December 31, 2009, the aggregate principal balances of loans outstanding from BOHR and Shore to the
Company were $21.5 million and $2.0 million, respectively. The loans from BOHR to the Company were
not adequately secured with collateral under applicable regulations. |
(23) |
|
Regulatory Capital Requirements |
|
|
Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the
Company (on a consolidated basis) and the Banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as
calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can
initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if
undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Companys financial statements. The
Companys and the Banks capital amounts and classification are subject to qualitative judgments by
the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action
provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies. |
F-37
|
|
A summary of the Companys and the Banks required and actual capital components (in
thousands) follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well-Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
Under Prompt Action |
|
|
Actual |
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
Provisions |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
As of December 31, 2009
as restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Company |
|
$ |
141,168 |
|
|
|
6.03 |
% |
|
$ |
93,612 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Bank of Hampton Roads |
|
|
141,622 |
|
|
|
6.54 |
% |
|
|
86,634 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
129,951 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Shore Bank |
|
|
21,668 |
|
|
|
11.13 |
% |
|
|
7,789 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
11,684 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Total Risk-Based Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Company |
|
|
171,699 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
% |
|
|
187,224 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Bank of Hampton Roads |
|
|
169,950 |
|
|
|
7.85 |
% |
|
|
173,268 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
216,586 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Shore Bank |
|
|
24,121 |
|
|
|
12.39 |
% |
|
|
15,578 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
19,473 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Leverage Ratio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Company |
|
|
141,168 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
% |
|
|
122,193 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Bank of Hampton Roads |
|
|
141,622 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
% |
|
|
111,249 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
139,061 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Shore Bank |
|
|
21,668 |
|
|
|
7.13 |
% |
|
|
12,151 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
15,189 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Company |
|
$ |
265,468 |
|
|
|
9.89 |
% |
|
$ |
107,386 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Bank of Hampton Roads |
|
|
70,499 |
|
|
|
12.43 |
% |
|
|
22,690 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
34,035 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Shore Bank |
|
|
24,483 |
|
|
|
11.42 |
% |
|
|
8,578 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
12,867 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Gateway Bank1 |
|
|
169,321 |
|
|
|
8.79 |
% |
|
|
77,076 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
115,614 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Total Risk-Based Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Company |
|
|
299,235 |
|
|
|
11.15 |
% |
|
|
214,772 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Bank of Hampton Roads |
|
|
76,931 |
|
|
|
13.56 |
% |
|
|
45,380 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
56,725 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Shore Bank |
|
|
27,164 |
|
|
|
12.67 |
% |
|
|
17,156 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
21,445 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Gateway Bank1 |
|
|
193,629 |
|
|
|
10.05 |
% |
|
|
154,152 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
192,690 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Leverage Ratio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Company |
|
|
265,468 |
|
|
|
32.06 |
% |
|
|
33,120 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Bank of Hampton Roads |
|
|
70,499 |
|
|
|
11.77 |
% |
|
|
23,953 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
29,942 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Shore Bank |
|
|
24,483 |
|
|
|
8.44 |
% |
|
|
11,607 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
14,508 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Gateway Bank1 |
|
|
169,321 |
|
|
|
8.04 |
% |
|
|
84,281 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
105,351 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Gateway Bank was merged into BOHR in May 2009. |
|
|
The regulatory risk-based capital guidelines to which we are subject measure capital relative to
risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet financial instruments. Tier I capital is comprised of
shareholders equity, net of unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities, less
intangible assets, while total risk-based capital adds certain debt instruments and qualifying
allowances for loan losses. |
|
|
We are considered to be undercapitalized under applicable regulations, BOHR is also considered to
be undercapitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. Section 29 of
the Federal Deposit Insurance Act limits the use of brokered deposits by institutions that are less
than well-capitalized and allows the FDIC to place restrictions on interest rates that
institutions may pay. As of December 31, 2009, Shore Bank was well-capitalized. |
|
|
On May 29, 2009, the FDIC approved a final rule to implement new interest rate restrictions on
institutions that are not well-capitalized. The rule, which became effective on January 1, 2010,
limits the interest rate paid by such institutions to 75 basis points above a national rate, as
derived from the interest rate average of all institutions. On |
F-38
|
|
December 4, 2009, the FDIC issued a Financial Institution Letter, FIL-69-2009, which requires
institutions that are not well-capitalized to request a determination from the FDIC whether they
are operating in an area where rates paid on deposits are higher than the national rate. The
Financial Institution Letter allows the institutions that submit determination requests by
December 31, 2009 to follow the national rate for local customers by March 1, 2010, if determined
not to be operating in a high rate area. Regardless of the determination, institutions must use the
national rate caps to determine conformance for all deposits outside the market area beginning
January 1, 2010. |
|
|
Although there can be no assurance that we will be successful, the Board and management will make
their utmost efforts to raise sufficient capital to regain well-capitalized status at all levels,
and we are continuing to explore options for raising additional capital. |
(24) |
|
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities |
|
|
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, establishes a framework for measuring fair value.
It defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It also
permits the measurement of transactions between market participants at the measurement date and the
measurement of selected eligible financial instruments at fair value at specified election dates. |
|
|
The Company groups our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in three levels,
based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the
assumptions used to determine fair value. The majority of instruments fall into the Level 1 or 2
fair value hierarchy. Valuation methodologies for the fair value hierarchy are as follows: |
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and
equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an
active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury
securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in
over-the-counter markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices in
markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable
or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level
2 assets and liabilities include debt securities with quoted
prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded
instruments and derivative contracts whose value is determined
using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the
market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by
observable market data. |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity and that are significant to the fair value of the
assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include
financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing
models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar
techniques as well as instruments for which the determination of
fair value requires significant management judgment or
estimation. |
|
|
A financial instruments categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. |
|
|
ASC 820 requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not
recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that value. ASC 820 excludes
certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements.
Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying fair value
of the Company. The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair
value for its financial instruments, as defined by ASC 820: |
|
(a) |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, overnight funds sold, and
interest-bearing deposits in other banks. The carrying amount approximates fair value. |
F-39
|
(b) |
|
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale |
|
|
|
|
Fair values are based on published market prices where available. If quoted market prices are not
available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with
similar characteristics, or discounted cash flow. Investment securities available-for-sale are
carried at their aggregate fair value. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Loans Held For Sale |
|
|
|
|
The carrying value of loans held for sale is a reasonable estimate of fair value since the loans
are expected to be sold within a short period. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using interest rates
currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. |
|
|
(e) |
|
Interest Receivable and Interest Payable |
|
|
|
|
The carrying amount approximates fair value. |
|
|
(f) |
|
Bank Owned Life Insurance |
|
|
|
|
The carrying amount approximates fair value. |
|
|
(g) |
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (for example, interest and noninterest demand and
savings accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date
(this is, their carrying values). The carrying amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market
accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair
values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow
calculation that applies market interest rates on comparable instruments to a schedule of
aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. |
|
|
(h) |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the rates
currently offered for borrowings of similar remaining maturities and collateral requirements. These
include other borrowings, overnight funds purchased, and FHLB borrowings. |
|
|
(i) |
|
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit |
|
|
|
|
The only amounts recorded for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are the
deferred fees arising from these unrecognized financial instruments. These deferred fees are not
deemed significant at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and as such, the related fair values have not
been estimated. |
F-40
The estimated fair value (in thousands) of the Companys financial instruments required to be
disclosed under ASC 825, Financial Instruments, at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
|
Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Value |
|
Fair Value |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
16,995 |
|
|
$ |
16,995 |
|
|
$ |
42,827 |
|
|
$ |
42,827 |
|
Overnight funds sold and due from FRB |
|
|
139,228 |
|
|
|
139,228 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
43,821 |
|
|
|
43,821 |
|
|
|
4,975 |
|
|
|
4,975 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
161,062 |
|
|
|
161,062 |
|
|
|
149,637 |
|
|
|
149,637 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
12,615 |
|
|
|
12,615 |
|
|
|
5,064 |
|
|
|
5,064 |
|
Loans, net |
|
|
2,293,995 |
|
|
|
2,364,702 |
|
|
|
2,548,308 |
|
|
|
2,550,018 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
8,788 |
|
|
|
8,788 |
|
|
|
12,272 |
|
|
|
12,272 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
48,354 |
|
|
|
48,354 |
|
|
|
46,603 |
|
|
|
46,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
2,495,040 |
|
|
|
2,486,449 |
|
|
|
2,296,146 |
|
|
|
2,299,179 |
|
FHLB borrowings |
|
|
228,215 |
|
|
|
233,356 |
|
|
|
279,065 |
|
|
|
282,005 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
49,254 |
|
|
|
50,316 |
|
|
|
77,223 |
|
|
|
77,223 |
|
Overnight funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,300 |
|
|
|
73,300 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
5,814 |
|
|
|
5,814 |
|
Recurring Basis
The Company measures or monitors certain of its assets and liabilities on a fair value basis. Fair
value is used on a recurring basis for those assets and liabilities that were elected as well as
for certain assets and liabilities in which fair value is the primary basis of accounting. The
following table reflects the fair value (in thousands) of assets and liabilities measured and
recognized at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Assets /Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
161,062 |
|
|
$ |
1,357 |
|
|
$ |
158,477 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
Derivative loan commitments |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
12,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Assets /Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
149,637 |
|
|
$ |
6,080 |
|
|
$ |
142,387 |
|
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
Derivative loan commitments |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
5,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Using Significant Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
(Level 3 measurements only) |
|
|
|
Investment Securities |
|
|
Derivative Loan |
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale |
|
|
Commitments |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
Unrealized losses included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3, net |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following describe the valuation techniques used to measure fair value for our assets and
liabilities classified as recurring.
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale. Where quoted prices are available in an active
market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities
would include highly liquid government bonds, mortgage products, and exchange traded equities. If
quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models or
quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. Level 2 securities would include U.S.
agency securities, mortgage-backed agency securities, obligations of states and political
subdivisions, and certain corporate, asset backed and other securities valued using third party
quoted prices in markets that are not active. In certain cases where there is limited activity or
less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the
valuation hierarchy.
Derivative Loan Commitments. The Company enters into commitments to originate mortgage
loans whereby the interest rate is fixed prior to funding. These commitments, in which the Company
intends to sell in the secondary market, are considered freestanding derivatives. These are carried
at fair value and are included in other assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Loans held for sale. The Company sells loans to outside investors. Fair value of mortgage
loans held for sale is estimated based on the commitments into which individual loans will be
delivered. As of December 31, 2009, mortgage loans held for sale had a net carrying value of
approximately $12.6 million which approximated its fair value. On December 31, 2008, mortgage loans
held for sale had a net carrying value of approximately $5.1 million which approximated its fair
value.
Nonrecurring Basis
Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not
measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain
circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment.) The adjustments are based on
appraisals of underlying collateral or other observable market prices when current appraisals or
observable market prices are available. Where we do not have a current appraisal, an existing
appraisal or other valuation would be utilized after discounting it to reflect current market
conditions, and, as such, may include significant management assumptions and input with respect of
the determination of fair value.
To assist in the discounting process, a valuation matrix was developed to provide valuation
guidance for collateral dependent loans and foreclosed real estate where it was deemed that an
existing appraisal was outdated as to current market conditions. The matrix is situated on both a
temporal and collateral type axis in an attempt to compensate for value fluctuations within the
respective asset classes situated in the captured time period. The matrix applies discounts to
external appraisals depending on the type of real estate and age of the appraisal. The discounts
are generally specific point estimates; however in some cases, the matrix allows for a small range
of values. To address the changing economic conditions prevalent during 2009, the discounts were
based in part upon externally derived data including but not limited to Case-Shiller composite
indices, Moodys REAL
F-42
Commercial Property Prices Indices, and information from Zillow.com. The discounts were also
based upon managements knowledge of market conditions and prices of sales of foreclosed real
estate. In addition, matrix value adjustments may be made by our independent appraisal group to
reflect property value trends within specific markets as well as actual sales data from market
transactions and/or foreclosed real estate sales. In the case where an appraisal is greater than
two years old for collateral dependent impaired loans and foreclosed real estate, it is the
Companys policy to classify these as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. The average age of
appraisals for Level 3 valuations of collateral dependent loans was 2.87 years as of December 31,
2009. Management periodically reviews the discounts in the matrix as compared to valuations from
updated appraisals and modifies the discounts should updated appraisals reflect valuations
significantly different than those derived utilizing the matrix. To date, management believes the
appraisal discount matrix has resulted in appropriate adjustments to existing appraisals thereby
providing management with reasonable valuations for the collateral underlying the loan portfolio.
The following table presents the carrying amount (in thousands) for impaired loans and adjustments
made to fair value during the respective reporting periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
December 31, 2009 Using |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total Losses |
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
240,044 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
149,346 |
|
|
$ |
90,698 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
December 31, 2008 Using |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total Losses |
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Our nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value
on a nonrecurring basis relate to foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets and goodwill. The
amounts below represent the carrying values (in thousands) for our foreclosed real estate and
repossessed assets and goodwill and impairment adjustments made to fair value during the respective
reporting periods.
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
December 31, 2009 Using |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total Losses |
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets |
|
$ |
8,867 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,867 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,043 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,837 |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
December 31, 2008 Using |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total Losses |
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets |
|
$ |
5,092 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,092 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
82,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following describe the valuation techniques used to measure fair value for our nonfinancial
assets and liabilities classified as nonrecurring.
Foreclosed Real Estate and Repossessed Assets. The adjustments to foreclosed real estate
and repossessed assets are based primarily on appraisals of the real estate or other observable
market prices. Our policy is that fair values for these assets are based on current appraisals. In
most cases, we maintain current appraisals for these items. Where we do not have a current
appraisal, an existing appraisal would be utilized after discounting it to reflect current market
conditions, and, as such, may include significant management assumptions and input with respect to
the determination of fair value. As described above, we utilize a valuation matrix to assist in
this process.
Goodwill. The adjustments to goodwill are made in accordance with FASB ASC 320-20-35 and
FASB ASC 320-20-35-30 in which the prescribed two-step impairment testing was performed on goodwill
arising from mergers with SFC and GFH.
F-43
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and the states of Virginia,
Maryland, and North Carolina. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal
and state income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2006. The current and
deferred components of income tax expense (in thousands) for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008, and 2007 were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current |
|
$ |
(9,043 |
) |
|
$ |
4,496 |
|
|
$ |
4,158 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
(24,064 |
) |
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
(568 |
) |
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
57,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
23,908 |
|
|
$ |
3,660 |
|
|
$ |
3,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provisions for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 differ from
the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before taxes due to
the following (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Federal income tax expense (benefit), at statutory rate |
|
$ |
(62,140 |
) |
|
$ |
3,709 |
|
|
$ |
3,555 |
|
Decrease resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income tax, net of federal benefit |
|
|
(1,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance of deferred tax assets |
|
|
57,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate change |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and tax-exempt interest |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
29,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers life insurance |
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
Other |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
23,908 |
|
|
$ |
3,660 |
|
|
$ |
3,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the
carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for
income tax purposes. Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities
(in thousands) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
52,510 |
|
|
$ |
22,804 |
|
Federal net operating loss carryforward |
|
|
10,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
State net operating loss carryforward |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
|
|
AMT carryforward |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of securities and other assets |
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
14,567 |
|
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loan interest |
|
|
4,658 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
Nonqualified deferred compensation |
|
|
3,135 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
Other |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance |
|
|
75,263 |
|
|
|
40,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(57,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
18,248 |
|
|
|
40,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
Deferred loan costs |
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
Fair value adjustment to net assets acquired in business combinations |
|
|
13,148 |
|
|
|
4,257 |
|
Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
335 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
Other |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
17,851 |
|
|
|
8,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
397 |
|
|
$ |
32,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax
purposes of $29.5 million, which are available to offset future federal taxable income, if any,
through 2029. In addition, the Company has alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of
approximately $502 thousand, which are available to reduce federal regular income taxes, if any,
over an indefinite period. Since we expect to become a regular tax payer after our net operating
losses are fully utilized, we expect to be able to utilize this AMT carryforward.
In addition to a net operating loss carryforward, our net deferred tax asset consisted primarily of
two asset components offset by one liability component: (1) At December 31, 2009, the timing
differences related to the allowance for loan losses was $142.2 million, resulting in a deferred
tax asset of approximately $52.5 million. (2) Interest income related to non-performing loans
(referred to as lost interest) is recognized as taxable income for tax purposes, but is not
recorded as income for book purposes. Lost interest was approximately $12.6 million at December 31,
2009, resulting in a deferred tax asset of approximately $4.7 million. (3) The aggregate deferred
tax effect of all purchase accounting entries related to the acquisitions of GFH and Shore resulted
in a net deferred tax liability of approximately $13.1 million at December 31, 2009.
A valuation allowance was established in 2009 related to all components of net deferred tax assets
excluding unrealized loss on securities available for sale. The valuation allowance was established
based upon a determination that it was not more likely than not the deferred tax assets would be
fully realized primarily as a result of the significant operating losses experienced by the Company
during 2009.
ASC 740 provides a comprehensive model for how the Company should recognize, measure, present, and
disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the Company has taken or expects
to take on its tax return. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized
tax benefits as part of the tax provision. The Company recognized minimal amounts in penalties and
fees for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The Company has no uncertain tax positions at
December 31, 2009.
F-45
(26) |
|
Condensed Parent Company Only Financial Statements |
The condensed financial position as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the condensed results of
operations and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009,
of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., parent company only, are presented below (in thousands).
Condensed Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash on deposit with subsidiaries |
|
$ |
4,414 |
|
|
$ |
55,605 |
|
Equity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
5,104 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
178,142 |
|
|
|
372,703 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
529 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
5,678 |
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
190,105 |
|
|
$ |
437,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
$ |
51,747 |
|
|
$ |
78,646 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
9,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
14,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
65,092 |
|
|
|
92,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
134,970 |
|
|
|
133,542 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
13,846 |
|
|
|
13,611 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
165,391 |
|
|
|
171,284 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
(188,448 |
) |
|
|
26,482 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
125,013 |
|
|
|
344,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
190,105 |
|
|
$ |
437,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
Condensed Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
|
$ |
7,429 |
|
|
$ |
4,420 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of securities |
|
|
(2,469 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
8,155 |
|
|
|
4,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,151 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
|
5,757 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in
undistributed earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
(6,219 |
) |
|
|
6,627 |
|
|
|
4,140 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2,697 |
) |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Equity in undistributed earnings (loss) of subsidiaries |
|
|
(197,928 |
) |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(201,450 |
) |
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
|
6,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount |
|
|
8,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(210,139 |
) |
|
$ |
7,175 |
|
|
$ |
6,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-47
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(201,450 |
) |
|
$ |
7,175 |
|
|
$ |
6,811 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed (earnings) loss of subsidiaries |
|
|
197,928 |
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
(2,575 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
Board fees |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment |
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in other assets |
|
|
(3,704 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
Change in other liabilities |
|
|
(12,236 |
) |
|
|
3,240 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(13,670 |
) |
|
|
10,861 |
|
|
|
5,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equity securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of equity securities |
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in loans |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,000 |
) |
|
|
(788 |
) |
Investment in affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
(37,435 |
) |
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in borrowings |
|
|
(28,000 |
) |
|
|
20,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares in private placement |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchased |
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
(2,877 |
) |
Common dividends paid, net |
|
|
(4,261 |
) |
|
|
(2,936 |
) |
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
Preferred dividends paid and amortization of preferred
stock discount |
|
|
(7,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash exchanged in mergers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Series C preferred stock and warrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit realized from stock options exercised |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
Issuance of shares to 401(k) plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
Issuance of shares to executive savings plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(38,926 |
) |
|
|
81,131 |
|
|
|
(4,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(51,191 |
) |
|
|
54,557 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
55,605 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
4,414 |
|
|
$ |
55,605 |
|
|
$ |
1,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27) |
|
Related Party Transactions |
The Company had a 19% interest in Tidewater Home Funding, LLC (THF), which was sold in 2009. The
Company accounted for this investment under the equity method. BOHR had a warehouse credit facility
for THF for up to $10,000,000. As of December 31, 2008, THF had drawn $3.6 million on this
warehouse line of credit, at a variable rate of 7.25%.
F-48
Loans are made to the Companys executive officers and directors and their associates during
the ordinary course of business. In managements opinion, these loans are made on substantially the
same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable
loans with other persons and do not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present
other unfavorable features. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, loans to executive officers, directors,
and their associates amounted to $90.9 million and $88.3 million, respectively. During 2009,
additional loans and repayments of loans by executive officers, directors, and their associates
were $65.1 million and $62.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, $7.5 million of loans
made to insiders for the purpose of acquiring the Companys stock was deducted from the Companys
loans and shareholders equity.
Deposits are taken from the Companys executive officers and directors and their associates during
the ordinary course of business. In managements opinion, these deposits are taken on substantially
the same terms, including interest rates, as those prevailing at the time for comparable deposits
from other persons. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, deposits from executive officers, directors, and
their associates amounted to $38.8 million and $16.0 million, respectively.
The Company leases one of its Nags Head and one of its Kitty Hawk branches from a director and his
wife for monthly payments of $8,000 and $17,096, respectively. The term of the Nags Head lease
was recently renewed for five years commencing August 2009. Kitty Hawk is a land lease which
commenced in April 2006 for a term of twenty years, with three five-year renewals.
One of the Companys directors is the managing member of two limited liability companies that serve
as the managers for the legal entities which own and manage the Dominion Tower at 999 Waterside
Drive, Norfolk, Virginia 23510. The Company leases the second floor and a portion of the nineteenth
floor of the Dominion Tower for its executive offices and a portion of the first floor as a
financial center. The lease expires in September 2016, with one renewal option for a period of
seven years. Rent payments made in 2009, 2008, and 2007 totaled $724 thousand, $625 thousand, and
$583 thousand, respectively.
The Company leases from a director the land on which one of its Eastern Shore branches is located
for monthly payments of $2,006. The terms of this lease were recently renewed for five years
commencing June 2009 with one additional five-year renewal.
BOHR and Shore had loans outstanding to the Company with balances of $21.5 million and $2.0
million, respectively, as of December 31, 2009. The loan from BOHR was inadequately secured in
violation of Regulation W promulgated to the Federal Reserve.
F-49
(28) |
|
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) |
Summarized unaudited quarterly financial data (in thousands) for the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008 is as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
As Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
34,798 |
|
|
$ |
37,388 |
|
|
$ |
37,728 |
|
|
$ |
39,531 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
8,097 |
|
|
|
10,911 |
|
|
|
11,829 |
|
|
|
13,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
26,701 |
|
|
|
26,477 |
|
|
|
25,899 |
|
|
|
26,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
65,666 |
|
|
|
33,662 |
|
|
|
33,706 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
2,998 |
|
|
|
7,232 |
|
|
|
5,655 |
|
|
|
6,440 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
78,911 |
|
|
|
21,706 |
|
|
|
50,330 |
|
|
|
19,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(114,878 |
) |
|
|
(21,659 |
) |
|
|
(52,482 |
) |
|
|
11,477 |
|
Provision for income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
37,333 |
|
|
|
(8,282 |
) |
|
|
(9,253 |
) |
|
|
4,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
(152,211 |
) |
|
|
(13,377 |
) |
|
|
(43,229 |
) |
|
|
7,367 |
|
Preferred stock dividend and accretion of discount |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
2,995 |
|
|
|
2,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(153,581 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,737 |
) |
|
$ |
(46,224 |
) |
|
$ |
4,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(7.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.13 |
) |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(7.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.13 |
) |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
13,610 |
|
|
$ |
12,370 |
|
|
$ |
9,793 |
|
|
$ |
9,404 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
5,039 |
|
|
|
4,848 |
|
|
|
4,012 |
|
|
|
4,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
8,571 |
|
|
|
7,522 |
|
|
|
5,781 |
|
|
|
5,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
5,671 |
|
|
|
6,541 |
|
|
|
4,659 |
|
|
|
4,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
2,542 |
|
|
|
2,221 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,696 |
|
|
$ |
1,673 |
|
|
$ |
1,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-50
Deferral of Trust Preferred Dividends. In January 2010, the Company exercised its right to
defer all quarterly distributions on the trust preferred securities it assumed in connection with
its merger with GFH, which are identified immediately below (collectively, the Trust Preferred
Securities).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Redeemable |
|
Mandatory |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
on or After |
|
Redemption |
Gateway Capital Statutory Trust I |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 3.10% |
|
September 17, 2008 |
|
September 17, 2033 |
Gateway Capital Statutory Trust II |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 2.65% |
|
July 17, 2009 |
|
June 17, 2034 |
Gateway Capital Statutory Trust III |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 1.50% |
|
May 30, 2011 |
|
May 30, 2036 |
Gateway Capital Statutory Trust IV |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
LIBOR + 1.55% |
|
July 30, 2012 |
|
July 30, 2037 |
On April 9, 2010, the Company exercised its right to continue the deferral of such quarterly
distributions. Interest payable under the Trust Preferred Securities continues to accrue during the
deferral period and interest on the deferred interest also accrues, both of which must be paid at
the end of the deferral period. Prior to the expiration of the deferral period, the Company has the
right to further defer interest payments, provided that no deferral period, together with all prior
deferrals, exceeds 20 consecutive quarters and that no event of default (as defined by the terms of
the applicable Trust Preferred Securities) has occurred and is continuing at the time of the
deferral. The Company was not in default with respect to the terms of the Trust Preferred
Securities at the time the quarterly payments were deferred and such deferrals did not cause an
event of default under the terms of the Trust Preferred Securities.
On April 1, 2010, the Company received a non-compliance notice from the NASDAQ Stock Market stating
that because the Company did not timely file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009, it is no longer in compliance with the rules for continued listing, including
Rule 5250(c)(l). NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5250(c)(l) requires the Company to file with NASDAQ, on a
timely basis, all reports and other documents required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The Company believes that it will regain compliance with NASDAQs listing rules upon
the filing of this Form 10-K and will seek confirmation from NASDAQ accordingly.
F-51
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
As Restated |
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
19,198 |
|
|
$ |
16,995 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
43,821 |
|
Overnight funds sold and due from Federal Reserve Bank |
|
|
640,527 |
|
|
|
139,228 |
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
168,781 |
|
|
|
161,062 |
|
Restricted equity securities, at cost |
|
|
21,378 |
|
|
|
29,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
34,726 |
|
|
|
12,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
2,101,085 |
|
|
|
2,426,692 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(163,253 |
) |
|
|
(132,697 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
1,937,832 |
|
|
|
2,293,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
94,526 |
|
|
|
97,512 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
8,788 |
|
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets,
net of valuation allowance |
|
|
38,584 |
|
|
|
8,867 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
397 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
11,353 |
|
|
|
12,839 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
49,619 |
|
|
|
48,355 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
43,250 |
|
|
|
45,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,067,572 |
|
|
$ |
2,919,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
252,085 |
|
|
$ |
248,682 |
|
Interest-bearing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand |
|
|
771,376 |
|
|
|
916,865 |
|
Savings |
|
|
73,110 |
|
|
|
82,860 |
|
Time deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than $100 |
|
|
778,153 |
|
|
|
889,788 |
|
$100 or more |
|
|
718,386 |
|
|
|
356,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
2,593,110 |
|
|
|
2,495,040 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
219,169 |
|
|
|
228,215 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
49,703 |
|
|
|
49,254 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
33,316 |
|
|
|
18,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,899,029 |
|
|
|
2,794,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock - 1,000,000 shares authorized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A non-convertible, non-cumulative perpetual
preferred stock, $1,000 liquidation value, 0 and 23,266
shares issued and outstanding on September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,919 |
|
Series B non-convertible, non-cumulative perpetual
preferred stock, $1,000 liquidation value, 0 and 37,550
shares issued and outstanding on September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,729 |
|
Series C fixed rate, cumulative preferred stock, $1,000
liquidation value, 0 and 80,347 shares issued and outstanding
on September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,322 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value on September 30, 2010 and $0.625 par
value on December 31, 2009, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized
on September 30, 2010 and 100,000,000 on December 31, 2009;
684,680,352 shares issued and outstanding on September 30, 2010
and 22,154,320 on December 31, 2009 |
|
|
6,847 |
|
|
|
13,846 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
410,866 |
|
|
|
165,391 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(252,994 |
) |
|
|
(188,448 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. shareholders equity
|
|
|
168,119 |
|
|
|
125,013 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
168,543 |
|
|
|
125,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,067,572 |
|
|
$ |
2,919,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-52
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
(unaudited) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
27,706 |
|
|
$ |
35,908 |
|
|
$ |
88,128 |
|
|
$ |
109,793 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
4,986 |
|
|
|
4,794 |
|
Overnight funds sold and due from Federal Reserve Bank |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
29,496 |
|
|
|
37,388 |
|
|
|
93,616 |
|
|
|
114,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
10,039 |
|
|
|
4,696 |
|
Savings |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
Time deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than $100 |
|
|
3,547 |
|
|
|
3,197 |
|
|
|
11,190 |
|
|
|
11,914 |
|
$100 or more |
|
|
3,323 |
|
|
|
3,560 |
|
|
|
8,055 |
|
|
|
10,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits |
|
|
9,361 |
|
|
|
8,460 |
|
|
|
29,656 |
|
|
|
27,841 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
1,622 |
|
|
|
4,133 |
|
|
|
5,003 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
2,254 |
|
|
|
2,974 |
|
Overnight funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
11,553 |
|
|
|
10,911 |
|
|
|
36,043 |
|
|
|
36,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
17,943 |
|
|
|
26,477 |
|
|
|
57,573 |
|
|
|
78,450 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
83,684 |
|
|
|
33,662 |
|
|
|
183,935 |
|
|
|
68,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense)
after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(65,741 |
) |
|
|
(7,185 |
) |
|
|
(126,362 |
) |
|
|
9,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
2,054 |
|
|
|
5,029 |
|
|
|
6,186 |
|
Mortgage banking revenue |
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
8,621 |
|
|
|
3,717 |
|
Gain (loss) on sale of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
2,695 |
|
Gain on sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets |
|
|
(2,914 |
) |
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
(6,128 |
) |
|
|
(880 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairment of securities (includes total
other-than-temporary impairment losses of $67 and $490, net of $0 and $147 recognized in other comprehensive income for the nine
months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, before taxes) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(343 |
) |
Insurance revenue |
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
3,894 |
|
Brokerage revenue |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
Income from bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
|
2,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
5,955 |
|
|
|
7,232 |
|
|
|
16,887 |
|
|
|
19,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
12,591 |
|
|
|
10,366 |
|
|
|
33,296 |
|
|
|
32,146 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
6,765 |
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
3,965 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,976 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
4,629 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
3,058 |
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,705 |
|
|
|
5,093 |
|
|
|
18,690 |
|
|
|
13,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
24,779 |
|
|
|
21,706 |
|
|
|
68,814 |
|
|
|
91,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax benefit |
|
|
(84,565 |
) |
|
|
(21,659 |
) |
|
|
(178,289 |
) |
|
|
(62,664 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(8,282 |
) |
|
|
(2,219 |
) |
|
|
(13,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(84,480 |
) |
|
|
(13,377 |
) |
|
|
(176,070 |
) |
|
|
(49,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
attributable to Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. |
|
|
(84,893 |
) |
|
|
(13,377 |
) |
|
|
(176,653 |
) |
|
|
(49,239 |
) |
Preferred stock dividend, accretion of discount
and conversion of preferred stock to common stock |
|
|
(114,912 |
) |
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
(112,114 |
) |
|
|
7,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
30,019 |
|
|
$ |
(14,737 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,539 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.63 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.63 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
29,350,815 |
|
|
|
21,830,851 |
|
|
|
24,546,337 |
|
|
|
21,774,620 |
|
Effect of
warrants |
|
|
192,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
29,543,048 |
|
|
|
21,830,851 |
|
|
|
24,546,337 |
|
|
|
21,774,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-53
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
(in thousands, except share data) |
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
(unaudited) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital Surplus |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 (as restated) |
|
|
141,163 |
|
|
$ |
134,970 |
|
|
|
22,154,320 |
|
|
$ |
13,846 |
|
|
$ |
165,391 |
|
|
$ |
(188,448 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(746 |
) |
|
$ |
125,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176,653 |
) |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176,070 |
) |
Change in
unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of taxes of $2,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
Reclassification
adjustment for securities gains included in net income, net of taxes of $(164) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172,507 |
) |
Amortization of fair market value adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock dividend declared and amortization of preferred stock discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
Stock
offering, net of issuance costs of $25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587,500,050 |
|
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
|
204,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
Conversion
of preferred stock to common stock |
|
|
(141,163 |
) |
|
|
(136,099 |
) |
|
|
75,031,550 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
23,612 |
|
|
|
111,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change par value from $0.625 to $0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,621 |
) |
|
|
13,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
Forfeiture of non-vested stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,568 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Change in stock financed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Distributed noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
684,680,352 |
|
|
$ |
6,847 |
|
|
$ |
410,866 |
|
|
$ |
(252,994 |
) |
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
$ |
3,400 |
|
|
$ |
168,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-54
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
(unaudited) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(176,070 |
) |
|
$ |
(49,239 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,856 |
|
|
|
4,237 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets and fair value adjustments |
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
(4,402 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
183,935 |
|
|
|
68,557 |
|
Proceeds from mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
279,156 |
|
|
|
231,494 |
|
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(301,267 |
) |
|
|
(237,393 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts
on investment securities |
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
Gain on sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Losses on foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets |
|
|
6,128 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
Gain on sale of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(2,695 |
) |
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
(1,217 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairment of securities |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
Changes in deferred taxes |
|
|
(1,828 |
) |
|
|
6,534 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,976 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
(30,940 |
) |
Interest payable |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
(1,570 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
14,835 |
|
|
|
(3,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
12,002 |
|
|
|
10,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and calls of debt securities
available for sale |
|
|
18,070 |
|
|
|
36,175 |
|
Proceeds from sale of debt securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,133 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of debt securities available for sale |
|
|
(22,612 |
) |
|
|
(7,515 |
) |
Purchase of (proceeds from) restricted equity securities |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(11,782 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of restricted equity securities |
|
|
8,444 |
|
|
|
9,824 |
|
Proceeds from the sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
697 |
|
Net decrease in loans |
|
|
133,586 |
|
|
|
64,439 |
|
Purchase of premises and equipment |
|
|
(1,220 |
) |
|
|
(2,837 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets |
|
|
5,883 |
|
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
145,312 |
|
|
|
116,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
98,851 |
|
|
|
30,103 |
|
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,450 |
|
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
(6,550 |
) |
|
|
(71,500 |
) |
Distributed noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in overnight funds borrowed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,300 |
) |
Net decrease in other borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,000 |
) |
Common stock repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(545 |
) |
Forfeiture of non-vested stock |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
210,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
613 |
|
Excess tax benefit realized from stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
Preferred stock dividends paid and
amortization of preferred stock discount |
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
(7,319 |
) |
Common stock dividends paid, net of reinvestment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
303,635 |
|
|
|
(92,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
460,949 |
|
|
|
33,722 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
200,044 |
|
|
|
48,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
660,993 |
|
|
$ |
82,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
35,885 |
|
|
$ |
37,767 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
13,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental non-cash information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends reinvested |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
531 |
|
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities |
|
|
6,371 |
|
|
|
(1,070 |
) |
Transfer between loans and other real estate owned |
|
|
41,728 |
|
|
|
7,767 |
|
Unpaid stock
issuance costs included in other liabilities |
|
|
20,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-56
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
Item 1. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE A BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
(the Company, we, us, or our) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial reporting and with the instructions
to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements
reflect all adjustments (consisting of a normal recurring nature) considered necessary for a fair
presentation. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. For further information,
refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes, as restated, thereto included in
the Companys restated annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as
amended (the 2009 Form 10-K/A) filed August 13, 2010.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new guidance relating to
the accounting for transfers of financial assets. The new guidance, which was issued as Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets,
an amendment to SFAS No. 140, was adopted into Codification in December 2009 through the issuance
of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-16. The new standard provides guidance to improve the
relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that an entity
provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a
transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferors
continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. The new guidance was effective
January 1, 2010. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to variable interest entities. The new
guidance, which was issued as SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), was
adopted into Codification in December 2009. The objective of the guidance is to improve
financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more
relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements.
SFAS No. 167 was effective as
of January 1, 2010. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-15, Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in
Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing. ASU 2009-15 amends Subtopic 470-20
to expand accounting and reporting guidance for own-share lending arrangements issued in
contemplation of convertible debt issuance. ASU 2009-15 was effective for fiscal years beginning
on or after December 15, 2009 and interim periods within those fiscal years for arrangements
outstanding as of the beginning of those fiscal years. The adoption of the new guidance did not
have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-04, Accounting for Various Topics Technical
Corrections to SEC Paragraphs. ASU 2010-04 makes technical
corrections to existing Securities
Exchange Commission (SEC) guidance including the following topics: accounting for subsequent
investments, termination of an interest rate swap, issuance of financial statements subsequent
events, use of residual method to value acquired assets other than goodwill, adjustments in
assets and liabilities for holding gains and losses, and selections of discount rate used for
measuring defined benefit obligations. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends Subtopic 820-10 to
clarify existing disclosures, require new disclosures, and includes conforming amendments to
guidance on employers disclosures about postretirement benefit
plan assets. ASU 2010-06 was
effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for
disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after
F-57
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of the new
guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-08, Technical Corrections to Various Topics. ASU
2010-08 clarifies guidance on embedded derivatives and hedging. ASU
2010-08 was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of the new guidance
did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to
Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. ASU 2010-09 addresses both the interaction of
the requirements of Topic 855 with the SECs reporting requirements and the intended breadth of
the reissuance disclosures provisions related to subsequent events. An entity that is an SEC
filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated.
ASU 2010-09 was effective immediately. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-18, Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part
of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset. ASU 2010-18 states that modifications of
loans that are accounted for within a pool under ASC 310-30 do not result in the removal of those
loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a
troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool
of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change.
The amendments do not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of ASC 310-30 that are not
accounted for within pools. Loans accounted for individually under ASC 310-30 continue to be
subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within ASC 310-40,
ReceivablesTroubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors.
The amendments were effective for
modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first
interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The
adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The new disclosure guidance will significantly
expand the existing requirements and will lead to greater transparency into a companys exposure
to credit losses from lending arrangements. The extensive new disclosures of information as of
the end of a reporting period will become effective for both interim and annual reporting periods
ending after December 15, 2010. Specific items regarding activity that occurred before the
issuance of the ASU, such as the allowance rollforward and modification disclosures, will be
required for periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company is currently assessing the
impact that ASU 2010-20 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-25, Plan AccountingDefined Contribution Pension
Plans. ASU 2010-25 states that participant loans be classified as notes receivable from
participants, which are segregated from plan investments and measured at their unpaid principal
balance plus an accrued but unpaid interest. The amendments should be applied retrospectively to
all prior periods presented, effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this pronouncement will
have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
NOTE B RECAPITALIZATION PLAN
The Companys pursuit of strategic alternatives to raise capital and strengthen its consolidated
balance sheet have resulted in shareholders approving an increase in authorized shares of common
stock to 1,000,000,000, effective September 28, 2010. On that date, the par value of the
Companys common stock (the Common Stock) was also changed from $0.625 to $0.01 per share.
F-58
HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
On September 30, 2010, institutional investors (the Investors) purchased $235.0 million worth
of common shares, or 587,500,000 shares, at $0.40 per share under the Companys expected $255.0
million private placement (the Private Placement) in the respective amounts listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Registered Name |
|
Shares Issued |
|
Carlyle Financial Services Harbor, L.P. |
|
|
164,956,965 |
|
ACMO-HR, L.L.C. |
|
|
153,020,190 |
|
CapGen Capital Group VI, L.P. |
|
|
114,223,775 |
|
M.H. Davidson & Co. |
|
|
1,561,302 |
|
Davidson Kempner Partners |
|
|
10,869,716 |
|
Davidson Kempner Institutional Partners, L.P. |
|
|
21,988,770 |
|
David Kempner International, Ltd. |
|
|
25,336,954 |
|
Davidson Kempner Distressed Opportunities International, Ltd |
|
|
5,797,326 |
|
Davidson Kempner Distressed Opportunities Funds L.P. |
|
|
2,720,467 |
|
Fire Tree Value Master Fund, L.P. |
|
|
45,193,824 |
|
Fir Tree REOF II Master Fund, LLC |
|
|
23,080,711 |
|
C12 Protium Value Opportunities Ltd. |
|
|
18,750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
587,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The shares were offered and sold in compliance with the exemption from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D, as
promulgated by the SEC. Furthermore, CapGen Capital Group VI, LP (CapGen) has received
approval from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to become a bank holding
company for the Company and its bank subsidiaries. As a result, CapGen is permitted to exercise
future control over the Company.
On September 30, 2010, the Company exchanged 80,347 shares of its outstanding Fixed-Rate
Cumulative Perpetual Series C preferred stock (Series C Preferred) held by the United States
Department of the Treasury (the Treasury) for newly-created convertible shares of Series C-1
preferred stock (Series C-1 Preferred) and converted such shares of Series C-1 Preferred into
52,225,550 shares of Common Stock. Also on that date, the terms of the outstanding Treasury
warrant (the Warrant) were amended to provide for the purchase of up to 1,325,858 shares of
Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share for a ten-year term following the issuance
of the amended warrant to Treasury (the Amended TARP
Warrant). These transactions were conducted in compliance with the exemption from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
As reported in the Companys Amendment No. 2 to its Schedule TO, filed on October 1, 2010, on
September 29, 2010, the Company exchanged 21,906,000 newly-issued shares of Common Stock
described therein for previously
outstanding shares of Series A and B preferred stock tendered by preferred shareholders in
exchange offers (the Exchange Offers) with holders of such preferred stock. The Exchange
Offers were exempted from registration under Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act.
On September 30, 2010, the Company sent irrevocable conversion notices to the holders of all
remaining outstanding shares of Series A and Series B
preferred stock. Upon such conversion, each
share remaining of Series A and Series B preferred stock was automatically cancelled and converted into the
right to receive 375 common shares upon delivery of the Series A and Series B preferred stock
certificates to the Company, for an aggregate issuance of 900,000 common shares. Such conversion
is also exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act.
During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company will commence a rights offering providing holders
of Common Stock as of 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on September 29, 2010, with a non-transferable right
to purchase newly issued shares of Common Stock at $0.40 per share, the same price paid by
Investors and Treasury (the Rights Offering).
F-59
HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
The holders of Common Stock who will receive the related purchase rights (Rights) are
shareholders who held common shares immediately before the initial closing of the aforementioned
Private Placement, including holders of Series A Preferred and Series B Preferred who tendered
their Series A Preferred and Series B Preferred in the Exchange Offers. In the aggregate, the
Rights Offering is expected to provide for the purchase of $40 million worth of Common Stock.
Neither the Treasury nor the Investors will be issued any Rights in the Rights Offering; however,
in the event the Rights Offering is not fully subscribed, the Investors have agreed to purchase
those shares of Common Stock not purchased in the Rights Offering
provided that certain conditions are met.
On September 30, 2010, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 7,846,859 shares of Common Stock
to Carlyle Investment Management LLC, which also received a $3.0 million cash fee, warrants to
purchase 23,540,576 shares of Common Stock to ACMO-HR LLC, warrants to purchase 11,770,288 shares
of Common Stock to CapGen Capital Group VI LP, and warrants to purchase 1,325,858 shares of
Common Stock to the Treasury. The warrants have a strike price of
$0.40 per share and ten year lives. Both standard warrants and
contingent warrants were issued in the transaction. Standard
warrants are immediately exercisable. Contingent warrants may only be
exercised upon or after the earlier of; (1) the written stay of the
written Agreement and (2) the occurrence of a Sale Event
as defined in the applicable warrant agreement. These
transactions were conducted in compliance with the exemption from registration contained in
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506.
The remaining $20 million of the Private Placement is expected to close by the fourth quarter of
2010, contemporaneously with the closing of the Rights Offering.
Because of the capitalization transactions, certain of the Companys deferred tax assets may be
limited in the future. However, since the Company currently provides an allowance against all of
the net deferred tax assets, any such limitation would not have an impact on the Companys
financial position at September 30, 2010.
NOTE C REGULATORY MATTERS AND GOING CONCERN CONSIDERATIONS
Effective June 17, 2010, the Company and its banking subsidiary, Bank of Hampton Roads (BOHR),
entered into a written agreement (herein called the Written Agreement) with the Federal Reserve
Bank of Richmond (the FRB) and the Bureau of Financial Institutions of the Virginia State
Corporation Commission (Bureau of Financial Institutions). The Companys other banking
subsidiary, Shore Bank (Shore), is not a party to the Written Agreement.
Written Agreement
Under the terms of the Written Agreement, BOHR agreed to develop and submit for approval plans to
(a) strengthen board oversight of management and BOHRs operations, (b) strengthen credit risk
management policies, (c) improve BOHRs position with respect to loans, relationships, or other
assets in excess of $2.5 million which are now, or may in the future become, past due more than
90 days, are on BOHRs problem loan list, or adversely classified in any report of examination of
BOHR, (d) review and revise, as appropriate, current policy and maintain sound processes for
determining, documenting, and recording an adequate allowance for loan and lease losses, (e)
improve management of BOHRs liquidity position and funds management policies, (f) provide
contingency planning that accounts for adverse scenarios and identifies and quantifies available
sources of liquidity for each scenario, (g) reduce the Banks reliance on brokered deposits, and
(h) improve BOHRs earnings and overall condition.
In addition, BOHR has agreed that it will (a) not extend, renew, or restructure any credit that
has been criticized by the FRB or the Bureau of Financial Institutions absent prior board of
directors approval in accordance with the restrictions in the Written Agreement, (b) eliminate
all assets or portions of assets classified as loss and thereafter charge off all assets
classified as loss in a federal or state report of examination, unless otherwise approved by
the FRB, (c) comply with legal and regulatory limitations on indemnification payments and
severance payments, and (d) appoint a committee to monitor compliance with the terms of the
Written Agreement.
In addition, the Company has agreed that it will (a) not take any other form of payment
representing a reduction in BOHRs capital or make any distributions of interest, principal, or
other sums on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities absent prior regulatory
approval, (b) take all necessary steps to correct certain technical
F-60
HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
violations of law and regulation cited by the FRB, (c) refrain from guaranteeing any debt without
the prior written approval of the FRB and the Bureau of Financial Institutions, and (d) refrain
from purchasing or redeeming any shares of its stock without the prior written consent of the FRB
or the Bureau of Financial Institutions.
Under the terms of the Written Agreement, both the Company and BOHR agreed to submit for approval
capital plans to maintain sufficient capital at the Company, on a consolidated basis, and to
refrain from declaring or paying dividends absent prior regulatory approval.
To date, the Company and BOHR have met all of the deadlines for taking actions required by the
FRB and the Bureau of Financial Institutions under the terms of the Written Agreement. The Audit
Committee has been appointed to oversee the Companys compliance with the terms of the agreement
and has met each month to review compliance. Written plans have been submitted for strengthening
board oversight, strengthening credit risk management practices, improving liquidity, reducing
the reliance on brokered deposits, improving capital, and curing the technical violations of laws
and regulations. The Company has also submitted its written policies and procedures for
maintaining an adequate allowance for loan and lease losses and its plans for all foreclosed real
estate and nonaccrual and delinquent loans in excess of $2.5 million. Additionally, the Company
instituted the required review process for all classified loans. Previously, the Company charged
off the assets identified as loss from the previous examination. Moreover, the Company has
raised $235.0 million in the initial closing of the Private Placement. The Company and BOHR were
well-capitalized as of September 30, 2010. As a result, management believes the Company and
BOHR are in full compliance with the terms of the Written Agreement.
Going Concern Considerations
The consolidated financial statements of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as restated, and its Form 10-Q as of and for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2010 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates
the realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of business for
the foreseeable future. The Company reported net income available to common shareholders of
$30.0 million and a net loss available to common shareholders of $64.5 million for the three and
nine months, respectively, ended September 30, 2010. Prior to accretion of discount, preferred
stock dividends, and the conversion of preferred stock into Common Stock, we experienced a net loss
of $84.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and $176.7 million year to date. Due
to the Companys financial results, the substantial uncertainty throughout the U.S. banking
industry, and the Written Agreement the Company and BOHR have entered into and described above,
doubts existed regarding the Companys ability to continue as a going concern through the second
quarter of 2010. However, management believes this concern has been mitigated by the initial closing of the Private
Placement that occurred on September 30, 2010. With the receipt of $235.0 million of new
capital, the Company and BOHR returned to well-capitalized status.
NOTE D STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Compensation cost relating to stock-based transactions is accounted for in the financial
statements based on the fair value of the share-based award on the date of grant. The Company
calculates the fair value of it stock options at the date of grant using a lattice option pricing
model. Stock options granted with pro-rata vesting schedules are expensed over the vesting
period on a straight-line basis.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and the
options exercised, including the total intrinsic value and cash received, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows.
F-61
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Expense recognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to stock options |
|
$ |
88,506 |
|
|
$ |
135,918 |
|
Related to share awards |
|
|
31,587 |
|
|
|
240,100 |
|
Related tax benefit |
|
|
28,791 |
|
|
|
73,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of options exercised: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,243 |
|
Previously acquired shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intrinsic value of options exercised |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31,533 |
|
Cash received from options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
613,209 |
|
The Company has granted stock options to its directors and employees under stock compensation
plans that have been approved by the Companys shareholders. All outstanding options have terms
that range from five to ten years and are either fully vested and exercisable at the date of
grant or vest ratably over periods that range from one to ten years. A summary of the Companys
stock option activity and related information for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is as
follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Value |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,420,213 |
|
|
$ |
12.60 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(115,514 |
) |
|
|
13.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,304,699 |
|
|
$ |
12.56 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,215,909 |
|
|
$ |
12.36 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information pertaining to options outstanding and options exercisable as of September 30, 2010 is
as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ranges of |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Number of Options |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Number of Options |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
$3.09 - $5.05 |
|
|
61,751 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
|
$ |
4.13 |
|
|
|
61,751 |
|
|
$ |
4.13 |
|
$6.53 - $8.77 |
|
|
297,086 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
|
|
|
8.02 |
|
|
|
297,086 |
|
|
|
8.02 |
|
$9.11 - $10.65 |
|
|
379,990 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
|
|
9.77 |
|
|
|
378,200 |
|
|
|
9.77 |
|
$12.00 - $12.49 |
|
|
184,128 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
|
|
|
12.03 |
|
|
|
126,195 |
|
|
|
12.03 |
|
$19.43 - $22.07 |
|
|
343,051 |
|
|
|
4.45 |
|
|
|
20.02 |
|
|
|
313,984 |
|
|
|
19.86 |
|
$23.67 - $24.67 |
|
|
38,693 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
24.46 |
|
|
|
38,693 |
|
|
|
24.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.09 - $24.67 |
|
|
1,304,699 |
|
|
|
3.58 |
|
|
$ |
12.56 |
|
|
|
1,215,909 |
|
|
$ |
12.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-62
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
The Company may issue new shares to satisfy stock option grants. As of September 30, 2010, there
were 766,127 shares available under the existing stock incentive plans. Shares may be
repurchased in the open market or, under certain circumstances, through privately negotiated
transactions. As of September 30, 2010, there was $242 thousand of unrecognized compensation
cost related to non-vested stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 3.1 years.
The Company has granted non-vested shares of Common Stock to certain directors and employees as
part of incentive programs and to those directors who elected to use deferred directors fees to
purchase non-vested shares of Common Stock. Non-vested shares of Common Stock awarded to
employees and directors as part of incentive programs have vesting schedules that range from one
to nine years and are expensed over the same schedules. Non-vested shares of Common Stock issued
to directors as a method of deferring their directors fees are expensed at the time the fees are
earned by the director. A summary of the Companys non-vested share activity and related
information for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
21,917 |
|
|
$ |
10.12 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
8.54 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(4,592 |
) |
|
|
8.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
15,325 |
|
|
$ |
10.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, there was $107 thousand of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to non-vested shares of Common Stock. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 3.0 years.
NOTE E INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities (in thousands) available
for sale at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
Description of Securities |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Agency securities |
|
$ |
14,026 |
|
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,543 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
147,435 |
|
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
152,159 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,091 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
2,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
163,552 |
|
|
$ |
5,324 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
168,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-63
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
Description of Securities |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Agency securities |
|
$ |
11,376 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
11,444 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
146,583 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
145,726 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
162,204 |
|
|
$ |
685 |
|
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
$ |
161,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities available for sale (in
thousands) that are not determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired by contractual maturity
at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are shown below. Expected maturities will differ
from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations
with or without call or prepayment penalties. Equity securities do not have contractual
maturities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
Due after one year but less than five years |
|
|
94,766 |
|
|
|
97,831 |
|
Due after five years but less than ten years |
|
|
66,680 |
|
|
|
68,854 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,091 |
|
|
|
2,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
163,552 |
|
|
$ |
168,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
|
$ |
1,025 |
|
Due after one year but less than five years |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
Due after five years but less than ten years |
|
|
9,569 |
|
|
|
9,557 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
147,652 |
|
|
|
146,805 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
162,204 |
|
|
$ |
161,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses (in thousands) at September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position is as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Description of Securities |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
4,383 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,383 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,383 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
4,512 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-64
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Description of Securities |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
Agency securities |
|
$ |
4,711 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,711 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
69,078 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,078 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73,821 |
|
|
$ |
1,457 |
|
|
$ |
1,097 |
|
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
$ |
74,918 |
|
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an
evaluation. Investment securities classified as available for sale are generally evaluated for
OTTI in accordance with ASC 320, Investment Debt and Equity Securities.
In determining OTTI, management considers many factors, including (1) the length of time and the
extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions,
and (4) whether the Company has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will
be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether
an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is
based on the information available to management at a point in time.
When OTTI occurs, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity
intends to sell the
security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery
of its amortized cost basis, less any current period credit loss. If an entity intends to sell
or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of
its amortized cost basis, less any current period credit loss, the OTTI shall be recognized in
earnings equal to the entire difference between the investments amortized cost basis and its
fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and it
is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery
of its amortized cost basis less any current period loss, the OTTI shall be separated into the
amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of
the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows
expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to
other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous
amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of
the investment.
The unrealized loss positions on debt securities at September 30, 2010 were considered to be
directly related to interest rate movements as there is minimal credit risk exposure in these
investments. At September 30, 2010 three mortgage-backed securities were in an unrealized loss
position. Management does not believe that these debt securities were other-than-temporarily
impaired at September 30, 2010.
For equity securities, our impairment analysis considered all available evidence including the
length of time and the extent to which the market value of each security was less than cost, the
financial condition of the issuer of each equity security (based upon financial statements of the
issuers), and the near term prospects of each issuer, as well as our intent and ability to retain
these investments for a sufficient period of time to allow for any anticipated recovery in their
respective market values. During the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, equity securities with
an amortized cost basis of $91 thousand and $1.1 million, respectively, were determined to be
other-than-temporarily impaired. Impairment losses of $67 thousand and $343 thousand were
recognized through noninterest income during the first nine months of 2010 and 2009,
respectively. An additional $147 thousand was included in accumulated other comprehensive loss
in the equity section of the balance sheet as of September 30, 2009. Management has evaluated
the unrealized losses associated with the remaining equity securities as of September 30, 2010
and, in managements opinion, the unrealized losses are temporary, and it is our intention to
hold these securities until their value recovers. A rollforward of the cumulative
other-than-temporary impairment losses (in thousands) recognized in earnings for all securities
is as follows.
F-65
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,030 |
|
Less: Realized gains for securities sales |
|
|
(2,352 |
) |
Add: Loss where impairment was not
previously recognized |
|
|
52 |
|
Add: Loss where impairment was
previously recognized |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
745 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys investment in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock totaled $18.3 million at
September 30, 2010. FHLB stock is generally viewed as a long-term investment and as a restricted
investment security and is carried at cost as there is no market for the stock other than the
FHLB or member institutions. Therefore, when evaluating FHLB stock for impairment, its value is
based on ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines
in value. The FHLB has reinstated dividends and the repurchase of its stock thereby improving
the value. The Company does not consider this investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired
at September 30, 2010, and no impairment has been recognized.
NOTE F ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN LOANS ACQUIRED IN A TRANSFER
ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, requires
acquired loans to be recorded at fair value and prohibits carrying over valuation allowances in
the initial accounting period for acquired impaired loans. Loans carried at fair value, mortgage
loans held for sale, and loans to borrowers in good standing under revolving credit agreements
are excluded from the scope of this pronouncement. It limits the yield that may be accreted to
the excess of the undiscounted expected cash flows over the investors initial investment in the
loan. The excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows may not be recognized as
an adjustment of yield. Subsequent increases in cash flows expected to be collected are
recognized prospectively through an adjustment of the loans yield over its remaining life.
Decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairments.
The Company acquired loans pursuant to the acquisition of Gateway Financial Holdings Inc. (GFH) in
December 2008. The Company reviewed the loan portfolio at acquisition to determine whether there
was evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and if it was probable that it
would be unable to collect all amounts due according to the loans contractual terms. When both
conditions existed, the Company accounted for each loan individually, considered expected
prepayments, and estimated the amount and timing of discounted expected principal, interest, and
other cash flows (expected at acquisition) for each loan. The Company determined the excess of
the loans scheduled contractual principal and contractual interest payments over all cash flows
expected at acquisition as an amount that should not be accreted into interest income
(non-accretable difference). The remaining amount, representing the excess of the loans cash
flows expected to be collected over the amount paid, is accreted into interest income over the
remaining life of the loan (accretable yield).
Over the life of the loan, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected.
The Company evaluates at the balance sheet date whether the present value of its loans
determined using the effective interest rates has decreased, and if so, the Company establishes a
valuation allowance for the loan. Valuation allowances for acquired loans reflect only those
losses incurred after acquisition; that is, the present value of cash flows expected at
acquisition that are not expected to be collected. Valuation allowances are established only
subsequent to acquisition of the loans.
Loans that were acquired in the GFH acquisition for which there was evidence of deterioration of
credit quality at acquisition date and for which it was probable that all contractually
required payments would not be made as scheduled had an outstanding balance of $39.1 million and
a carrying amount of $35.4 million at September 30, 2010. The carrying amount of these loans is
included in the balance sheet amount of loans receivable at September 30, 2010. Of these loans,
$14.7 million have experienced further deterioration since the acquisition date and are included
in the impaired loan amounts disclosed in Note G. The following table depicts the accretable
yield (in thousands) at the beginning and end of the period.
F-66
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretable |
|
|
|
Yield |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,042 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
(399 |
) |
Disposals |
|
|
(438 |
) |
Additions |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
335 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE G LOANS
The Company grants commercial, construction, real estate, and consumer loans to customers
throughout its lending areas.
The major classifications of loans (in thousands) are summarized as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
317,554 |
|
|
$ |
361,256 |
|
Construction |
|
|
560,173 |
|
|
|
757,702 |
|
Real estate-commercial mortgage |
|
|
677,829 |
|
|
|
740,570 |
|
Real estate-residential mortgage |
|
|
511,201 |
|
|
|
524,853 |
|
Installment loans (to individuals) |
|
|
34,718 |
|
|
|
42,858 |
|
Deferred loan fees and related costs |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
2,101,085 |
|
|
$ |
2,426,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans are made to the Companys executive officers and directors and their associates during the
ordinary course of business. In managements opinion, these loans are made on substantially the
same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for
comparable loans with other persons and do not involve more than normal risk of collectability or
present other unfavorable features. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, loans to
executive officers, directors, and their associates were $71.2 million and $90.9 million,
respectively. Of these loans at September 30, 2010, $3.5 million were made for the purpose of
purchasing Company stock and have been eliminated from both the loan and equity balances in the
consolidated balance sheets.
As of September 30, 2010, we are aware of and previously disclosed to our regulators that an
outstanding loan from BOHR, which was eliminated in consolidation, to the Company with an
aggregate balance of $21.5 million is inadequately secured in violation of Regulation W
promulgated by the FRB. The Company has been in discussions with banking regulators
about curing this violation by repayment of this loan through its capital raising efforts.
Additionally, as of September 30, 2010, we are aware of and previously disclosed to our
regulators that loans from Shore to its affiliates exceeded the 20% threshold. These Shore loans
were repaid on October 7, 2010.
NOTE H ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES AND NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
The purpose of the allowance for loan losses is to provide for probable losses inherent in the
loan portfolio. Management considers several factors in determining the allowance for loan loss,
including historical loan loss experience, the size and composition of the portfolio, and the
value of collateral agreements.
Transactions (in thousands) affecting the allowance for loan losses during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows.
F-67
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
132,697 |
|
|
$ |
51,218 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
183,935 |
|
|
|
68,557 |
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(157,634 |
) |
|
|
(20,977 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
4,255 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
163,253 |
|
|
$ |
99,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets consist of loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest, nonaccrual
loans, and foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets. Total non-performing assets were
$365.5 million or 12% of total assets at September 30, 2010 compared with $257.2 million or 9% of
total assets at December 31, 2009. Non-performing assets (in thousands) were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing interest |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
326,910 |
|
|
|
248,303 |
|
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets |
|
|
38,584 |
|
|
|
8,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
365,494 |
|
|
$ |
257,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated gross interest income that would have been recorded during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 if the foregoing nonaccrual loans had remained current in accordance with
their contractual terms totaled $7.5 million. Information (in thousands) on impaired loans is as
follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Impaired loans for which an allowance has been
provided |
|
$ |
309,936 |
|
|
$ |
331,532 |
|
Impaired loans for which no allowance has been
provided |
|
|
122,530 |
|
|
|
137,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
432,466 |
|
|
$ |
469,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance provided for impaired loans, included in the
allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
101,127 |
|
|
$ |
91,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance in impaired loans |
|
$ |
444,364 |
|
|
$ |
215,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized from impaired loans |
|
$ |
4,673 |
|
|
$ |
17,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides information (in thousands) related to the loan category and method
used to measure impairment at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
F-68
HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method Used to |
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
Loan Category |
|
Measure Impairment |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
1-4 family residential construction |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
$ |
11,741 |
|
|
$ |
20,851 |
|
Other construction and development |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
229,795 |
|
|
|
237,313 |
|
Secured by farm land |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
4,903 |
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
Secured by 1-4 family, revolving |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
6,146 |
|
|
|
6,018 |
|
Secured by 1-4 family, 1st lien |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
48,098 |
|
|
|
32,532 |
|
Secured by 1-4 family, junior lien |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
1,502 |
|
Secured by multifamily |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
8,374 |
|
|
|
8,137 |
|
Secured by nonfarm nonresidential
(owner occupied) |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
27,802 |
|
|
|
29,309 |
|
Secured by nonfarm nonresidential
(non-owner occupied) |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
66,460 |
|
|
|
75,947 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
25,853 |
|
|
|
56,081 |
|
Other consumer loans to individuals |
|
Estimated fair market value |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
|
|
$ |
432,466 |
|
|
$ |
469,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, loans classified as troubled debt
restructurings and included in impaired loans in the disclosure above totaled $50.6 million and
$73.5 million, respectively. Of these amounts, $50.6 million and $56.6 million were on accrual
status at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and $16.9 million were on
nonaccrual status at December 31, 2009. There were no troubled debt restructurings in nonaccrual
status at September 30, 2010. Troubled debt restructurings in nonaccrual status are returned to
accrual status after a period of performance under which the borrower demonstrates the ability
and willingness to repay the loan. None of the nonaccrual troubled debt restructurings were
returned to accrual status during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that all amounts due will not be collected
according to the contractual terms. For collateral dependent impaired loans, impairment is
measured based upon the fair value of the underlying collateral. Management considers a loan to
be collateral dependent when repayment of the loan is expected solely from the sale or
liquidation of the underlying collateral. The Companys policy is to charge off collateral
dependent impaired loans at the earlier of foreclosure, repossession, or liquidation at the point
it has been in nonaccrual status for 180 days. The Companys policy is to reduce the carrying
value of the loan to the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs
through a charge off to the allowance for loan losses. For loans that are not collateral
dependent, impairment is measured using discounted cash flows. Total impaired loans were $432.5
million and $469.1 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, the
majority of which were considered collateral dependent, and therefore, measured at the fair value
of the underlying collateral.
Impaired loans for which no allowance is provided totaled $122.5 million and $137.5 million at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Loans written down to their estimated fair value of
collateral less the costs to sell account for $66.5 million and $22.1 million of the impaired
loans for which no allowance has been provided as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. The average age of appraisals for these loans is 0.73 years at September 30, 2010.
The remaining impaired loans for which no allowance is provided are fully covered by the value
of the collateral, and therefore, no loss is expected on these loans.
In the opinion of management, based on conditions reasonably known to them, the allowance was
adequate at September 30, 2010. The allowance may be increased or decreased in the future based
on loan balances outstanding, changes in credit quality ratings of the loan
portfolio, changes in general economic conditions, or other risk factors.
F-69
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTE I PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Premises and equipment (in thousands) at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized
as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
31,238 |
|
|
$ |
31,335 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
58,128 |
|
|
|
58,177 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
3,411 |
|
Equipment, furniture, and fixtures |
|
|
14,150 |
|
|
|
14,828 |
|
Construction in process |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,361 |
|
|
|
107,758 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
(12,835 |
) |
|
|
(10,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
$ |
94,526 |
|
|
$ |
97,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE J SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT AGREEMENTS
The Company has entered into supplemental retirement agreements with several key officers and
recognizes expense each year related to these agreements based on the present value of the
benefits expected to be provided to the employees and any beneficiaries. The expense recognized
during the first nine months of 2010 and 2009 was $504 thousand and $850 thousand, respectively.
NOTE K INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets with an indefinite life are subject to impairment testing at least annually or
more often if events or circumstances suggest potential impairment. Other acquired intangible
assets determined to have a finite life are amortized over their estimated useful life in a
manner that best reflects the economic benefits of the intangible asset. Intangible assets with
a finite life are reviewed for impairment if conditions suggest the carrying amount is not recoverable. The gross carrying
amount and accumulated amortization (in thousands) for the Companys intangible assets is as
follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
$ |
8,105 |
|
|
$ |
2,719 |
|
|
$ |
8,105 |
|
|
$ |
1,703 |
|
Employment contract intangibles |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
Insurance book of business intangible |
|
|
6,450 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
6,450 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
15,685 |
|
|
$ |
4,332 |
|
|
$ |
15,685 |
|
|
$ |
2,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
weighted-average amortization period for core deposit intangibles is
54.1 months, employment contract intangibles is 31.5 months, and
insurance book of business intangible is 180.0 months.
NOTE L FORECLOSED REAL ESTATE AND REPOSSESSED ASSETS
Foreclosed assets are presented net of an allowance for losses. An analysis of the allowance for
losses (in thousands) on foreclosed assets is as follows.
F-70
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
356 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Provision for losses |
|
|
6,035 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(1,470 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
4,921 |
|
|
$ |
588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses (in thousands) applicable to foreclosed assets include the following.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Expenses incurred for foreclosed assets |
|
$ |
1,288 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
Net loss on sales of real estate |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Provision for losses |
|
|
6,035 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,416 |
|
|
$ |
1,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE M BUSINESS SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company has two community bank subsidiaries, BOHR and Shore, which provide loan and deposit
services throughout 60 locations in Virginia, North Carolina, and Maryland. In addition to its
banking operations, the Company has three other reportable segments: Mortgage, Investment, and
Insurance. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in
the summary of significant accounting policies in the Companys 2009 Form 10-K/A. Segment profit
and loss is measured by net income prior to corporate overhead allocation. Intersegment
transactions are recorded at cost and eliminated as part of the consolidation process. Because
of the interrelationships between the segments, the information is not indicative of how the
segments would perform if they operated as independent entities. The following table shows
certain financial information (in thousands) at September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and
September 30, 2009 for each segment and in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Insurance |
|
Total Assets at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
3,067,572 |
|
|
$ |
(331,282 |
) |
|
$ |
3,350,018 |
|
|
$ |
37,643 |
|
|
$ |
1,104 |
|
|
$ |
10,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets at December 31, 2009 (as
restated) |
|
$ |
2,919,576 |
|
|
$ |
(303,100 |
) |
|
$ |
3,197,510 |
|
|
$ |
13,599 |
|
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
$ |
10,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Insurance |
|
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
17,943 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,848 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
83,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
(65,741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,836 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
5,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
4,267 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
24,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,883 |
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) before income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(84,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86,139 |
) |
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling
interest |
|
|
(84,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,503 |
) |
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(84,893 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(85,503 |
) |
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-71
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Insurance |
|
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
26,477 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,367 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
33,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
(7,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,295 |
) |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
7,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,239 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
21,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,730 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before income
taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(21,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,786 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(8,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,326 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(13,377 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(13,460 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Insurance |
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
57,573 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
57,277 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
183,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
(126,362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126,658 |
) |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
16,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,478 |
|
|
|
8,626 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
68,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,501 |
|
|
|
5,712 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
3,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(178,289 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181,681 |
) |
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
213 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2,219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,406 |
) |
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling
interest |
|
|
(176,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178,275 |
) |
|
|
2,079 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
138 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(583 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(583 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(176,653 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(178,275 |
) |
|
$ |
1,496 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Insurance |
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
78,450 |
|
| $ |
|
|
|
$ |
78,144 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
68,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
9,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,587 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
19,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,590 |
|
|
|
3,678 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
3,894 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
91,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,419 |
|
|
|
2,843 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
3,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before
income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
(62,664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,242 |
) |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(13,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,977 |
) |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(49,239 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(50,265 |
) |
|
$ |
734 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE N FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value. It defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date. It also permits the measurement of transactions between market participants at the
measurement date and the measurement of selected eligible financial instruments at fair value at
specified election dates.
The Company groups our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in three levels,
based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the
assumptions used to determine fair value. The
F-72
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
majority of instruments fall into the Level 1 or 2 fair value hierarchy. Valuation methodologies
for the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and
equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an
active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury
securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in
over-the-counter markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that
are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full
term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities
include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less
frequently than exchange-traded instruments and derivative
contracts whose values are determined using a pricing model with
inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets
or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial
instruments whose value is determined using pricing models,
discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques as well
as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires
significant management judgment or estimation. |
Recurring Basis
The Company measures or monitors certain of its assets and liabilities on a fair value basis.
Fair value is used on a recurring basis for those assets and liabilities for
which fair value is the primary basis of
accounting. The following table reflects the fair value (in thousands) of assets and liabilities
measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance sheets at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
Assets / Liabilities |
|
|
in Active Markets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
|
for Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Description |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency securities |
|
$ |
14,543 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,543 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
152,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,079 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available
for sale |
|
|
168,781 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
166,702 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative loan commitments |
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
34,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-73
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
Assets / Liabilities |
|
|
in Active Markets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
|
for Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Description |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency securities |
|
$ |
11,444 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,444 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
145,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available
for sale |
|
|
161,062 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
158,476 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative loan commitments |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
12,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Held |
|
|
|
Investment Securities Available for Sale |
|
|
Commitments |
|
|
for Sale |
|
Description |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,358 |
|
|
$ |
158,476 |
|
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
12,615 |
|
Unrealized (gains) losses included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive gain (loss) |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances, and
settlements, net |
|
|
(837 |
) |
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
22,111 |
|
Transfers in and/or out, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
661 |
|
|
$ |
166,702 |
|
|
$ |
1,418 |
|
|
$ |
1,663 |
|
|
$ |
34,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following describes the valuation techniques used to measure fair value for our assets and
liabilities classified as recurring.
Investment Securities Available for Sale. Where quoted prices are available in an active
market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities
would include highly liquid government bonds, mortgage products, and exchange traded equities.
If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models
or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. Level 2 securities would include
U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed agency securities, obligations of states and political
subdivisions, and certain corporate, asset backed, and other securities valued using third party
quoted prices in markets that are not active. In certain cases where there is limited activity
or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of
the valuation hierarchy.
Derivative Loan Commitments. The Company enters into commitments to originate mortgage
loans whereby the interest rate is fixed prior to funding. These commitments, in which the
Company intends to sell in the secondary market, are considered freestanding derivatives.
Loans Held For Sale. The Company sells loans to outside investors. Fair value of
mortgage loans held for sale is estimated based on the commitments into which individual loans
will be delivered. As of September 30, 2010, mortgage loans held for sale had a net carrying
value of $34.7 million which approximated its fair value. On
F-74
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
December 31, 2009, mortgage loans
held for sale had a net carrying value of $12.6 million which approximated its fair value.
Non-recurring Basis
Certain assets, primarily impaired loans, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are
not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in
certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The adjustments to impaired loans are
based on appraisals of underlying collateral or other observable market prices when current
appraisals or observable market prices are available. Where we do not have a current appraisal,
an existing appraisal or other valuation would be utilized after discounting it to reflect
current market conditions, and, as such, may include significant management assumptions and input
with respect to the determination of fair value.
To assist in the discounting process, a valuation matrix was developed to provide valuation
guidance for collateral dependent loans and foreclosed real estate where it was deemed that an
existing appraisal was outdated as to current market conditions. The matrix applies discounts to
external appraisals depending on the type of real estate and age of the appraisal. The discounts
are generally specific point estimates; however in some cases, the matrix allows for a small
range of values. The discounts were based in part upon externally derived data including but not
limited to Case-Shiller composite indices, MIT CRE: Transactions Based Index, and information
from Zillow.com. The discounts were also based upon managements knowledge of market conditions
and prices of sales of foreclosed real estate. In addition, matrix value adjustments may be made
by our independent appraisal group to reflect property value trends within specific markets as
well as actual sales data from market transactions and/or foreclosed real estate sales. In the
case where an appraisal is greater than two years old for collateral dependent impaired loans and
foreclosed real estate, it is the Companys policy to classify these as Level 3 within the fair
value hierarchy; otherwise, they are classified as Level 2. The average age of appraisals for
Level 3 valuations of collateral dependent loans was 4.31 years as of September 30, 2010.
Management periodically reviews the discounts in the matrix as compared to valuations from
updated appraisals and modifies the discounts should updated appraisals reflect valuations
significantly different than those derived utilizing the matrix. To date, management believes
the appraisal discount matrix has resulted in appropriate adjustments to existing appraisals
thereby providing management with reasonable valuations for the collateral underlying the loan
portfolio. The following table presents the carrying amount (in thousands) for impaired loans
and adjustments made to fair value during the respective reporting periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets / Liabilities |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
|
September 30, 2010 Using |
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total Losses |
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
208,809 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
131,038 |
|
|
$ |
77,771 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets / Liabilities |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
|
December 31, 2009 Using |
|
|
Total |
|
Description |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Losses |
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
240,044 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
149,346 |
|
|
$ |
90,698 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Our nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis relate to foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets and
goodwill. The amounts below represent the carrying values (in thousands) for our foreclosed real
estate and repossessed assets and goodwill and impairment adjustments made to fair value during
the respective reporting periods.
F-75
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets / Liabilities |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
|
September 30, 2010 Using |
|
|
Total |
|
Description |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Losses |
|
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets |
|
$ |
38,584 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
38,377 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
6,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets / Liabilities |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
|
December 31, 2009 Using |
|
|
Total |
|
Description |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Losses |
|
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets |
|
$ |
8,867 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,867 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,043 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,837 |
|
The following describes the valuation techniques used to measure fair value for our nonfinancial
assets and liabilities classified as nonrecurring.
Foreclosed Real Estate and Repossessed Assets. The adjustments to foreclosed real estate
and repossessed assets are based primarily on appraisals of the real estate or other observable
market prices. Our policy is that fair values for these assets are based on current appraisals.
In most cases, we maintain current appraisals for these items. Where we do not have a current
appraisal, an existing appraisal would be utilized after discounting it to reflect current market
conditions, and, as such, may include significant management assumptions and input with the
respect of the determination of fair value. As described above, we utilize a valuation matrix to
assist in this process.
Goodwill. The adjustments to goodwill are made in accordance with ASC 320-20-35 and ASC
320-20-35-30 in which the prescribed two-step impairment testing was performed on goodwill
arising from mergers with Shore Financial Corporation (SFC) and GFH. All goodwill was written
off in 2009.
ASC 820 requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not
recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that value. It excludes
certain financial instruments and all
nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value
amounts presented do not represent the underlying fair value of the Company. The following
methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair value for its financial
instruments.
|
(a) |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, overnight funds sold and due
from FRB, and interest-bearing deposits in other banks. The carrying amount approximates
fair value. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Investment Securities Available for Sale |
|
|
|
|
Fair values are based on published market prices where available. If quoted market prices
are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices
of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flow. Investment
securities available for sale are carried at their aggregate fair value. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Loans Held for Sale |
|
|
|
|
The carrying value of loans held for sale is a reasonable estimate of fair value since
loans are expected to be sold within a short period. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of other loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using
interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of
similar credit quality. |
F-76
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
(e) |
|
Interest Receivable and Interest Payable |
|
|
|
|
The carrying amount approximates fair value. |
|
|
(f) |
|
Bank-Owned Life Insurance |
|
|
|
|
The carrying amount approximates fair value. |
|
|
(g) |
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (for example, interest and noninterest
demand and savings accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at
the reporting date (this is, their carrying values). The carrying amounts of
variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate
their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of
deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies market
interest rates on comparable instruments to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly
maturities on time deposits. |
|
|
(h) |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the
interest rates currently offered for borrowings of similar remaining maturities and
collateral requirements. These include other borrowings, overnight funds purchased, and
FHLB borrowings. |
|
|
(i) |
|
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit |
|
|
|
|
The only amounts recorded for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit
are the deferred fees arising from these unrecognized financial instruments. These
deferred fees are not deemed significant at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and
as such, the related fair values have not been estimated. |
The estimated fair value (in thousands) of the Companys financial instruments required to be
disclosed by ASC 825, Financial Instruments, at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as
follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
19,198 |
|
|
$ |
19,198 |
|
|
$ |
16,995 |
|
|
$ |
16,995 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
43,821 |
|
|
|
43,821 |
|
Overnight funds sold and due from FRB |
|
|
640,527 |
|
|
|
640,527 |
|
|
|
139,228 |
|
|
|
139,228 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
168,781 |
|
|
|
168,781 |
|
|
|
161,062 |
|
|
|
161,062 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
34,726 |
|
|
|
34,726 |
|
|
|
12,615 |
|
|
|
12,615 |
|
Loans, net |
|
|
1,937,832 |
|
|
|
2,003,088 |
|
|
|
2,293,995 |
|
|
|
2,364,702 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
8,788 |
|
|
|
8,788 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
49,619 |
|
|
|
49,619 |
|
|
|
48,354 |
|
|
|
48,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
2,593,110 |
|
|
|
2,647,014 |
|
|
|
2,495,040 |
|
|
|
2,486,449 |
|
FHLB borrowings |
|
|
219,169 |
|
|
|
231,820 |
|
|
|
228,215 |
|
|
|
233,356 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
49,703 |
|
|
|
51,501 |
|
|
|
49,254 |
|
|
|
50,316 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
F-77
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
NOTE O
TROUBLED ASSET RELIEF PROGRAM (TARP)
On December 31, 2008, and subsequent to the Companys acquisition of GFH, as part of the
Treasurys Capital Purchase Program (TARP CPP), the Company entered into a Letter Agreement and
Securities Purchase Agreement (collectively, the Purchase Agreement) with the Treasury,
pursuant to which the Company sold 80,347 shares of Series C Preferred, having a liquidation
preference of $1,000 per share and a Warrant to purchase 1,325,858 shares of Common Stock at an
initial exercise price of $9.09 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution and other
adjustments, for an aggregate purchase price of $80.3 million in cash.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) was enacted on February 17, 2009.
The ARRA includes a wide variety of programs intended to stimulate the economy and provide for
extensive infrastructure, energy, health, and education needs. In addition, the ARRA imposes
certain executive compensation and corporate governance obligations on all current and future
TARP recipients for such period as any obligation arising from financial assistance remains
outstanding (disregarding any warrants to purchase Common Stock of the Company that the Treasury
may hold). The executive compensation restrictions under the ARRA are more stringent than those
initially enacted by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA).
The ARRA amended Section 111 of
the EESA to require the Secretary of the Treasury (Secretary) to adopt additional standards
with respect to executive compensation and corporate governance for TARP recipients. The
standards required to be established by the Secretary include, in part, (1) prohibitions on
making golden parachute payments to senior executive officers and the next five most
highly-compensated employees during such time as any obligation arising from financial assistance
provided under the TARP remains outstanding (the Restricted Period), (2) prohibitions on paying
or accruing bonuses or other incentive awards for certain senior executive officers, and
employees, except for awards of long-term restricted stock with a value equal to no greater than
1/3 of the subject employees annual compensation that do not fully vest during the Restricted
Period or unless such compensation is pursuant to a valid written employment contract prior to
February 11, 2009, (3) requirements that TARP CPP participants provide for the recovery of any
bonus or incentive compensation paid to senior executive officers and the next 20 most
highly-compensated employees based on statements of earnings, revenues, gains, or other criteria
later found to be materially inaccurate, with the Secretary having authority to negotiate for
reimbursement, and (4) a review by the Secretary of all bonuses and other compensation paid by
TARP participants to senior executive employees and the next 20 most highly-compensated employees
before the date of enactment of the ARRA to determine whether such payments were inconsistent
with the purposes of the Act.
The ARRA also sets forth additional corporate governance obligations for TARP recipients,
including requirements for the Secretary to establish standards that provide for semi-annual
meetings of compensation committees of the board of directors to discuss and evaluate employee
compensation plans in light of an assessment of any risk posed from such compensation plans. TARP
recipients are further required by the ARRA to have in place company-wide policies regarding
excessive or luxury expenditures, permit non-binding shareholder say-on-pay proposals to be
included in proxy materials, as well as require written certifications by the chief executive
officer and chief financial officer with respect to compliance. On June 15, 2009, the Treasury
published its standards for executive compensation and corporate governance pursuant to ARRA.
On August 12, 2010, the Company and Treasury executed the Exchange Agreement (the Exchange
Agreement), which provided for (i) the exchange of the 80,347 shares of Series C Preferred for
80,347 shares of a newly-created Series C-1 Preferred with a liquidation preference of $1,000,
(ii) the conversion of the Series C-1 Preferred at a discounted conversion value of $260 per
share into 52,225,550 shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.40 per share; and
(iii) the amendment of the terms of the Warrant to provide for the purchase of up to 1,325,858
shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.40 per share for a ten-year term following the
issuance of the amended warrant.
F-78
HAMPTON
ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
We believe that, as a result of the conversion of the Series C-1 Preferred into Common Stock, the
Company no longer has any obligation to the Treasury outstanding, and we are no longer subject to
these restrictions. However, because certain of these restrictions apply to when conduct occurs,
instead of when payments are made, we still face limitations in our executive compensation
program that may make it more difficult to attract and retain executive officers.
NOTE P
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
12,591 |
|
|
$ |
10,366 |
|
|
$ |
33,296 |
|
|
$ |
32,146 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
6,765 |
|
|
|
6,316 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
3,965 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,976 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
4,629 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
3,058 |
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
Problem loan and repossessed
asset costs |
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,727 |
|
Bank franchise tax |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
Telephone and postage |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
Stationery, printing, and office
supplies |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
Directors and regional board fees |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
5,322 |
|
|
|
7,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
24,779 |
|
|
$ |
21,706 |
|
|
$ |
68,814 |
|
|
$ |
91,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE Q
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
We evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued.
F-79
_, 2010
Up to 100,000,000 Shares of Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to give you
written information other than this Prospectus or to make representations as to
matters not stated in this Prospectus. You must not rely on unauthorized
information. This Prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities or our
solicitation of your offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where
that would not be permitted or legal. Neither the delivery of this Prospectus
nor any sales made hereunder after the date of this Prospectus shall create an
implication that the information contained herein or the affairs of the Company
have not changed since the date of this Prospectus.
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution*
|
|
|
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission Registration Fee |
|
$ |
2,852 |
|
Printing Expenses |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
Accounting Fees and Expenses |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
Legal Fees and Expenses |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
Miscellaneous Expenses |
|
|
20,000 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
247,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
All expenses are estimates. |
Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Article 10 of Chapter 9 of Title 13.1 of the Code of Virginia permits a Virginia corporation
to indemnify any director or officer for reasonable expenses incurred in any legal proceeding in
advance of final disposition of the proceeding, if the director or officer furnishes the
corporation a written statement of his good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of
conduct prescribed by the Virginia Code, and a determination is made by the board of directors that
such standard has been met. In a proceeding by or in the right of the corporation, no
indemnification shall be made in respect of any matter as to which an officer or director is
adjudged to be liable to the corporation, unless the court in which the proceeding took place
determines that, despite such liability, such person is reasonably entitled to indemnification in
view of all of the relevant circumstances. In any other proceeding, no indemnification shall be
made if the director or officer is adjudged liable to the corporation on the basis that he
improperly received a personal benefit. Corporations are given the power to make any other or
further indemnity, including advance of expenses, to any director or officer that may be authorized
by the articles of incorporation or any bylaw made by the shareholders, or any resolution adopted,
before or after the event, by the shareholders, except an indemnity against willful misconduct or a
knowing violation of the criminal law. Unless limited by its articles of incorporation,
indemnification of a director or officer is mandatory when he or she entirely prevails in the
defense of any proceeding to which he or she is a party because he or she is or was a director or
officer.
The Registrants Articles of Incorporation provide that to the full extent that the Virginia
Act permits the limitation or elimination of the liability of directors or officers, a director or
officer of the Registrant shall not be liable to the Registrant or its shareholders for monetary
damages. The Registrants Articles of Incorporation also provide that to the full extent permitted
and in the manner prescribed by the Virginia Act and any other applicable law, the Registrant shall
indemnify a director or officer of the Registrant who is or was a party to any proceeding by reason
of the fact that he is or was such a director or officer or is or was serving at the request of the
Registrant as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise. Any aforesaid reference to directors,
officers, employees or agents includes former directors, officers, employees and agents and their
respective heirs, executors and administrators.
Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On November 20, 2009, we sold unregistered shares of Common Stock to the officers and
directors of the Company identified below.
II-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Total Consideration |
|
Purchaser |
|
Received |
|
|
Paid |
|
Patrick E. Corbin |
|
|
44,843.05 |
|
|
|
100,000.00 |
|
John A. B. Davies, Jr. |
|
|
44,843.05 |
|
|
|
100,000.00 |
|
Bobby L. Ralph |
|
|
2,242.15 |
|
|
|
5,000.00 |
|
Roland C. Smith, Sr. |
|
|
44,843.05 |
|
|
|
100,000.00 |
|
The consideration paid was the consolidated closing bid price of the Common Stock on
that date, $2.23 per share. All sales were made pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D. Each of these
sales was deemed to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Section
4(2) and Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933 as transactions by an issuer not involving a public
offering.
In addition, on December 30, 2009, John A. B. Davies, Jr. received a fully-vested 25,000 share
award of restricted Common Stock as an inducement for joining the Company. This award was deemed to
be exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Rule 701 promulgated
thereunder.
As described in the Current Report on Form 8-K of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. (the
Company), filed on August 17, 2010 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), the
Company entered into definitive investment agreements (the Investment Agreements) with a group of
investors led by Anchorage Advisors, L.L.C., CapGen Financial Group and The Carlyle Group to
purchase $255 million of newly-issued common shares from the Company through private placement
transactions (the Private Placement).
On September 30, 2010, the Company issued $235 million worth of common shares, or 587,500,000
shares, at a price of $0.40 per share in the following amounts to the following entities.
|
|
|
|
|
Registered Name |
|
Number of Shares Issued |
|
Carlyle Financial Services Harbor, L.P. |
|
|
164,956,965 |
|
ACMO-HR, L.L.C. |
|
|
153,020,190 |
|
CapGen Capital Group VI, LP |
|
|
114,223,775 |
|
M.H. Davidson & Co. |
|
|
1,561,302 |
|
Davidson Kempner Partners |
|
|
10,869,716 |
|
Davidson Kempner Institutional Partners, L.P. |
|
|
21,988,770 |
|
Davidson Kempner International, Ltd. |
|
|
25,336,954 |
|
Davidson Kempner Distressed Opportunities
International, Ltd. |
|
|
5,797,326 |
|
Davidson Kempner Distressed Opportunities Funds LP |
|
|
2,720,467 |
|
Fir Tree Value Master Fund, L.P. |
|
|
45,193,824 |
|
Fir Tree REOF II Master Fund, LLC |
|
|
23,080,711 |
|
C12 Protium Value Opportunities Ltd. |
|
|
18,750,000 |
|
TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES |
|
|
587,500,000 |
|
II-2
The shares were offered and sold in compliance with the exemption from registration pursuant
to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Rule 506 of
Regulation D, as promulgated by the SEC (Rule 506).
On September 30, 2010, the Company issued the warrants to purchase Common Stock described in
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010, to each of the following entities:
Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C, ACMO-HR, L.L.C. and CapGen Capital Group VI, LP. The
information contained in that current report is incorporated herein by reference. These
transactions were conducted in compliance with the exemption from registration contained in Section
4(2) of the Securities Act, and Rule 506.
On September 30, 2010, the Company exchanged 80,347 shares of Series C preferred stock held by
the United States Department of the Treasury for newly-created shares of Series C-1 preferred stock
and converted such shares of Series C-1 preferred stock into 52,225,550 shares of Common Stock.
These transactions were conducted in compliance with the exemption from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
As reported in the Companys Amendment No. 2 to its Schedule TO, filed on October 1, 2010 (the
Amended Schedule TO), on September 29, 2010, the Company exchanged the amount of newly-issued
shares of Common Stock described therein for previously outstanding shares of Series A and B
preferred stock tendered in such exchange offers. The information contained in the Amended
Schedule TO is incorporated herein by reference. These exchanges were exempted from registration
under Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act.
On September 30, 2010, the Company sent conversion notices to the holders of all remaining
shares of Series A and Series B preferred stock. Upon conversion, each share of Series A and
Series B preferred stock is automatically cancelled and converted into the right to receive 375
common shares upon delivery of the Series A and Series B preferred stock certificates to the
Company, for an aggregate issuance of 900,000 common shares. Such conversion is also exempt from
registration under Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act.
The material terms of the securities discussed in this Item 3.02 are contained in the
Companys Definitive Proxy Statement related to its 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders filed on
August 30, 2010 under the captions Proposal No. 3 To Approve the Issuance of up to 800,000,000
Shares of Common Stock at $0.40 Per Share under the Investment Agreements, which Includes
Shares for an Expected Aggregate Private Placement of $255 Million, a Rights Offering of up to $40
Million, and Warrants Certain Terms and Conditions of the Private Placements Fees and
Warrants, Proposal No. 6: Amendment of the Companys Articles of Incorporation to Increase the
Authorized Shares of Common Stock from 100,000,000 to 1,000,000,000 Description of Securities to
be Issued (other than Common Stock) and Proposal No. 6: Amendment of the Companys Articles of
Incorporation to Increase the Authorized Shares of Common Stock from 100,000,000 to 1,000,000,000
Description of Outstanding Securities, which such information is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company intends to use any net proceeds for capital contributions to its subsidiary banks and
for other general corporate purposes.
II-3
Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following exhibits are filed on behalf of the Registrant as part of this
registration statement:
|
|
|
Ex. |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., attached
as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 28, 2010,
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., as amended, attached as Exhibit 3.4 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 24, 2009, incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen of Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference from the Registrants Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Carlyle Contingent Warrant for purchase of Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Anchorage Contingent Warrant for purchase of Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Anchorage Standard Warrant for purchase of Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
CapGen Contingent Warrant for purchase of Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
CapGen Standard Warrant for purchase of Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Amended and Restated Warrant for Purchase of Shares of Common Stock issued to the United
States Department of the Treasury, incorporated by reference from the Registrants Form 8-K,
filed August 18, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated December 31, 2008, by and between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and
the United States Department of the Treasury, incorporated by reference from the Registrants
Form 8-K, filed January 5, 2009. |
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Exchange Agreement, dated August 12, 2010, by and between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and
the United States Department of the Treasury, incorporated by reference from the Registrants
Form 8-K, filed August 18, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Form of Rights Certificate.* |
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
Subscription Agent Agreement, executed November 10, 2010.* |
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Opinion of Williams Mullen* |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Investment Agreement, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by
reference from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amended and Restated CapGen Investment Agreement, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by
reference from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
II-4
|
|
|
Ex. |
|
Description |
10.3
|
|
Form of Second Amended and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference
from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by
reference from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Carlyle Investor Letter, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Anchorage Investor Letter, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
CapGen Investor Letter, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Consent Letter with affiliate of Davidson Kempner, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by
reference from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Consent Letter with affiliates of Fir Tree, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by reference
from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, among Goldman, Sachs & Co., CapGen Capital Group VI LP,
and C12 Protium Value Opportunities Ltd., dated September 23, 2010, incorporated by reference
from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed September 23, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Agreement, dated as of March 31, 1994, attached as Exhibit 10.5 to
the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, incorporated
herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of March 28, 1988, between the Registrant and Jack W. Gibson,
attached as Exhibit 7 of the Form F-1, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of February 1, 1997, between the
Registrant and Jack W. Gibson, attached as Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2003, between the Registrant
and Jack W. Gibson, attached as Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Amendment No. One to the Supplemental Retirement Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2003,
between the Registrant and Jack W. Gibson, attached as Exhibit 99.4 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2006, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and
Jack W. Gibson, dated as of May 27, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K dated June 2, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Supplemental Retirement Agreement between Bank of Hampton Roads and
Jack W. Gibson, dated May 27, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K dated June 2, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Director Retirement Plan, dated as of November 28, 2006, attached as Exhibit 10.28 to the
Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 1, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
II-5
|
|
|
Ex. |
|
Description |
10.19
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2007, between the Registrant and Douglas J.
Glenn, attached as Exhibit 10.29 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March
11, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
First Amendment to the Employment Agreement between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and
Douglas J. Glenn, dated as of May 27, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 2, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Agreement between Bank of Hampton Roads and Douglas J. Glenn, dated
May 27, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated
June 2, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Credit Agreement between Compass Bank and Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., dated May 29,
2008, attached as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 2,
2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Pledge Agreement between Compass Bank and Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., dated May 29,
2008, attached as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 2,
2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2006, between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
and Lorelle L. Fritsch, attached as Exhibit 10.35 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
First Amendment to the Employment Agreement between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and
Lorelle L. Fritsch, dated as of July 23, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.36 to the Registrants
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Bank of Hampton Roads Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of January 1, 2005,
attached as Exhibit 99.5 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2006,
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
First Amendment to Bank of Hampton Roads Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of
December 30, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.38 to the Registrants Annual Report on form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Second Amendment to the Bank of Hampton Roads Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated
as of December 30, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.39 to the Registrants Annual Report on form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. 2008 Director Deferred Compensation Plan dated as of January
1, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.40 to the Registrants Annual Report on form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Amended and Restated Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan
attached, as Exhibit 10.41 to the Registrants Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Executive Savings Plan, dated as of July 23, 2006, attached
as Exhibit 4 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-139968) dated January 12, 2007, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
First Amendment to Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Executive Savings Plan, dated as of
December 30, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.43 to the Registrants Annual Report on form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
II-6
|
|
|
Ex. |
|
Description |
10.33
|
|
Second Amendment to Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Executive Savings Plan, dated as of
December 30, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.44 to the Registrants Annual Report on form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Executive Savings Plan Trust, dated as of July 23, 2006,
attached as Exhibit 10.45 to the Registrants Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, dated as of March 14, 2006,
attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration
No. 333-134583) dated May 31, 2006, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
First Amendment to Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, dated as of
December 26, 2008 filed herewith. |
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
Non-Qualified Limited Stock Option Plan for Directors and Employees, dated March 31, 1994,
attached as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1994, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase Plan Prospectus, dated as of March 14,
2002, attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3 dated
March 14, 2002, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase Plan Prospectus, dated
as of July 23, 2008, included in Registrants Prospectus on Form 424B3 filed August 15, 2008,
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
Supplement No. 1 to Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase
Plan Prospectus, dated as of January 27, 2009, included in Registrants Prospectus on Form
424B3 filed March 4, 2009, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long-Term Incentive Plan,
attached as Exhibit 4.2 to Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-127978) dated August 31, 2005, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. 2001 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, attached as Exhibit
4.2 to Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-98021) dated August 13, 2002, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. 1999 Incentive Stock Option Plan, attached as Exhibit 4.2
to Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-98025) dated August 13, 2002, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. 1999 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, attached as Exhibit
4.2 to Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-98027) dated August 13, 2002, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. 1999 BOR Stock Option Plan, attached as Exhibit 4.2 to
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-144841) dated July 25, 2007, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
Shore Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, attached as Exhibit 99 to Shore
Financial Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-82838) dated
February 15, 2002, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
II-7
|
|
|
Ex. |
|
Description |
10.47
|
|
Shore Savings Bank, F.S.B. 1992 Stock Option Plan dated November 10, 1992, attached as
Exhibit 10 to Shore Financial Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-4EF dated
September 15, 1997, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
Employment Agreement between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and David Twiddy, attached as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 7, 2009,
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.49
|
|
Employment Agreement between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and John A. B. Davies, Jr.,
attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 30, 2009,
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
Letter regarding Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated October
13, 2010, attached as Exhibit 16.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
October 13, 2010, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
A list of the subsidiaries of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., incorporated by reference from
the Registrants Amendment No. 2 to its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Williams Mullen (included in Exhibit 5.1).* |
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Consent of Yount, Hyde and Barbour, P.C.* |
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
Powers of Attorney (included on signature page).** |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Form of Instructions as to Use of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Rights Certificates. * |
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Form of Letter to Clients.* |
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
Form of Letter to Shareholders.* |
|
|
|
99.4
|
|
Form of Nominee Holder Certification.* |
|
|
|
99.5
|
|
Beneficial Owner Election Form.* |
|
|
|
99.6
|
|
Form of Notice of Important Tax Information.* |
|
|
|
99.7
|
|
Form of Letter to Brokers and Other Nominee Holders.* |
|
|
|
99.8
|
|
Form of Cover Letter to Participants of the Companys 401(k) Plan.* |
|
|
|
99.9
|
|
Form of Q&A Letter to Participants of the Companys 401(k) Plan.* |
|
|
|
99.10
|
|
Form of Election Form for Participants in the Companys 401(k) Plan.* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Previously filed. |
Item 17. Undertakings
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:
II-8
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective
amendment to this registration statement:
(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of
1933;
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective
date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment
thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in
the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total
dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and
any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may
be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule
424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than
a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the
Calculation of Registration Fee table in the effective registration statement;
(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution
not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to
such information in the registration statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933,
each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time
shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities
being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
(4) That, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933,each
filing of the registrants annual report pursuant to section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit
plans annual report pursuant to section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that
is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such
securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(5) To supplement the prospectus, after the expiration of the subscription period, to set
forth the results of the subscription offer, the transactions by the underwriters during the
subscription period, the amount of unsubscribed securities to be purchased by the
underwriters, and the terms of any subsequent reoffering thereof. If any public offering by
the underwriters is to be made on terms differing from those set forth on the cover page of
the prospectus, a post-effective amendment will be filed to set forth the terms of such
offering.
(6) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may
be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion
of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Act, and
is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such
liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a
director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any
action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion
of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
II-9
indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(7) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the
information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement
in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant
pursuant to rule 424(b)(1), or (4), or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be
part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(8) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each
post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such
securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused
this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized in the city of Norfolk, Commonwealth of Virginia, on this
12th day of November, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/
John A.B. Davies, Jr. |
|
|
|
John A.B. Davies, Jr. |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each of the undersigned hereby appoints each of John A.B. Davies, Jr. and Douglas J. Glenn as
attorney-in-fact and agent for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, for and in the
name, place and stead of the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, any and all amendments (including
post-effective amendments) to
this registration statement, any other registration statements and exhibits thereto related to
the offering that is the subject of this registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462 under
such Act, and any and all applications, instruments and other documents to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to the registration of securities covered hereby,
with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things as may be necessary or
desirable in furtherance of such registration.
II-10
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has
been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE |
|
CAPACITY |
|
DATE |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John A.B. Davies, Jr.
|
|
President, Chief Executive
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
|
|
Officer, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Acting Chief Financial Officer,
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director, Executive Vice
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
|
|
President, Chief Operating
Officer, and General Counsel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
November 12, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
John A.B. Davies, Jr., by signing his name hereto, signs this
document on behalf of each of the persons indicated by an asterisk
above pursuant to powers of attorney duly executed by such persons
and previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
part of this registration statement. |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. Description
|
|
|
Ex. |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., attached
as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 28, 2010,
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., as amended, attached as Exhibit 3.4 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 24, 2009, incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen of Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference from the Registrants Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Carlyle Contingent Warrant for purchase of Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Anchorage Contingent Warrant for purchase of Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Anchorage Standard Warrant for purchase of Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
CapGen Contingent Warrant for purchase of Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
CapGen Standard Warrant for purchase of Common Stock, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Amended and Restated Warrant for Purchase of Shares of Common Stock issued to the United
States Department of the Treasury, incorporated by reference from the Registrants Form 8-K,
filed August 18, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated December 31, 2008, by and between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and
the United States Department of the Treasury, incorporated by reference from the Registrants
Form 8-K, filed January 5, 2009. |
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Exchange Agreement, dated August 12, 2010, by and between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and
the United States Department of the Treasury, incorporated by reference from the Registrants
Form 8-K, filed August 18, 2010. |
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Form of Rights Certificate.* |
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
Subscription Agent Agreement, executed November 10, 2010.* |
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Opinion of Williams Mullen* |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Investment Agreement, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by
reference from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amended and Restated CapGen Investment Agreement, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by
reference from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Form of Second Amended and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference
from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by
reference from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ex. |
|
Description |
10.5
|
|
Carlyle Investor Letter, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Anchorage Investor Letter, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
CapGen Investor Letter, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by reference from the
Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Consent Letter with affiliate of Davidson Kempner, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by
reference from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Consent Letter with affiliates of Fir Tree, dated August 11, 2010, incorporated by reference
from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, among Goldman, Sachs & Co., CapGen Capital Group VI LP,
and C12 Protium Value Opportunities Ltd., dated September 23, 2010, incorporated by reference
from the Registrants Form 8-K, filed September 23, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Agreement, dated as of March 31, 1994, attached as Exhibit 10.5 to
the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, incorporated
herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of March 28, 1988, between the Registrant and Jack W. Gibson,
attached as Exhibit 7 of the Form F-1, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of February 1, 1997, between the
Registrant and Jack W. Gibson, attached as Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2003, between the Registrant
and Jack W. Gibson, attached as Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Amendment No. One to the Supplemental Retirement Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2003,
between the Registrant and Jack W. Gibson, attached as Exhibit 99.4 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2006, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and
Jack W. Gibson, dated as of May 27, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K dated June 2, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Supplemental Retirement Agreement between Bank of Hampton Roads and
Jack W. Gibson, dated May 27, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K dated June 2, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Director Retirement Plan, dated as of November 28, 2006, attached as Exhibit 10.28 to the
Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 1, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2007, between the Registrant and Douglas J.
Glenn, attached as Exhibit 10.29 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March
11, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
First Amendment to the Employment Agreement between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and
Douglas J. Glenn, dated as of May 27, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 2, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
Ex. |
|
Description |
10.21
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Agreement between Bank of Hampton Roads and Douglas J. Glenn, dated
May 27, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated
June 2, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Credit Agreement between Compass Bank and Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., dated May 29,
2008, attached as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 2,
2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Pledge Agreement between Compass Bank and Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., dated May 29,
2008, attached as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 2,
2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2006, between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
and Lorelle L. Fritsch, attached as Exhibit 10.35 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
First Amendment to the Employment Agreement between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and
Lorelle L. Fritsch, dated as of July 23, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.36 to the Registrants
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Bank of Hampton Roads Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of January 1, 2005,
attached as Exhibit 99.5 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2006,
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
First Amendment to Bank of Hampton Roads Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated as of
December 30, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.38 to the Registrants Annual Report on form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Second Amendment to the Bank of Hampton Roads Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated
as of December 30, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.39 to the Registrants Annual Report on form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. 2008 Director Deferred Compensation Plan dated as of January
1, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.40 to the Registrants Annual Report on form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Amended and Restated Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Directors Deferred Compensation Plan
attached, as Exhibit 10.41 to the Registrants Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Executive Savings Plan, dated as of July 23, 2006, attached
as Exhibit 4 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-139968) dated January 12, 2007, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
First Amendment to Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Executive Savings Plan, dated as of
December 30, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.43 to the Registrants Annual Report on form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Second Amendment to Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Executive Savings Plan, dated as of
December 30, 2008, attached as Exhibit 10.44 to the Registrants Annual Report on form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Executive Savings Plan Trust, dated as of July 23, 2006,
attached as Exhibit 10.45 to the Registrants Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, dated as of March 14, 2006,
attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration
No. 333-134583) dated May 31, 2006, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
Ex. |
|
Description |
10.36
|
|
First Amendment to Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, dated as of
December 26, 2008 filed herewith. |
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
Non-Qualified Limited Stock Option Plan for Directors and Employees, dated March 31, 1994,
attached as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1994, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase Plan Prospectus, dated as of March 14,
2002, attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-3 dated
March 14, 2002, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase Plan Prospectus, dated
as of July 23, 2008, included in Registrants Prospectus on Form 424B3 filed August 15, 2008,
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
Supplement No. 1 to Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase
Plan Prospectus, dated as of January 27, 2009, included in Registrants Prospectus on Form
424B3 filed March 4, 2009, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long-Term Incentive Plan,
attached as Exhibit 4.2 to Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-127978) dated August 31, 2005, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. 2001 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, attached as Exhibit
4.2 to Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-98021) dated August 13, 2002, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. 1999 Incentive Stock Option Plan, attached as Exhibit 4.2
to Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-98025) dated August 13, 2002, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. 1999 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, attached as Exhibit
4.2 to Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-98027) dated August 13, 2002, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc. 1999 BOR Stock Option Plan, attached as Exhibit 4.2 to
Gateway Financial Holdings, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-144841) dated July 25, 2007, incorporated herein by reference. |
10.46
|
|
Shore Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, attached as Exhibit 99 to Shore
Financial Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-82838) dated
February 15, 2002, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.47
|
|
Shore Savings Bank, F.S.B. 1992 Stock Option Plan dated November 10, 1992, attached as
Exhibit 10 to Shore Financial Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-4EF dated
September 15, 1997, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
Employment Agreement between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and David Twiddy, attached as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 7, 2009,
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10.49
|
|
Employment Agreement between Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and John A. B. Davies, Jr.,
attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 30, 2009,
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
Letter regarding Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated October
13, 2010, attached as Exhibit 16.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
October 14, 2010, incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
Ex. |
|
Description |
21.2
|
|
A list of the subsidiaries of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., incorporated by reference from
the Registrants Amendment No. 2 to its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Williams Mullen (included in Exhibit 5.1).* |
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Consent of Yount, Hyde and Barbour, P.C.* |
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
Powers of Attorney (included on signature page).** |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Form of Instructions as to Use of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. Rights Certificates. * |
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Form of Letter to Clients.* |
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
Form of Letter to Shareholders.* |
|
|
|
99.4
|
|
Form of Nominee Holder Certification.* |
|
|
|
99.5
|
|
Beneficial Owner Election Form.* |
|
|
|
99.6
|
|
Form of Notice of Important Tax Information.* |
|
|
|
99.7
|
|
Form of Letter to Brokers and Other Nominee Holders.* |
|
|
|
99.8
|
|
Form of Cover Letter to Participants of the Companys 401(k) Plan.* |
|
|
|
99.9
|
|
Form of Q&A Letter to Participants of the Companys 401(k) Plan.* |
|
|
|
99.10
|
|
Form of Election Form for Participants in the Companys 401(k) Plan.* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Previously filed. |