Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - IRIS INTERNATIONAL INC | c08039exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - IRIS INTERNATIONAL INC | c08039exv31w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - IRIS INTERNATIONAL INC | c08039exv31w2.htm |
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - IRIS INTERNATIONAL INC | c08039exv32w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
or
o | Transition Report Pursuant Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 1-11181
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 94-2579751 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
9158 Eton Avenue
Chatsworth, California 91311
(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)
Chatsworth, California 91311
(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)
(818) 527-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of October 26, 2010, the issuer had 18,138,216 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding.
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except for share data)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 31,110 | $ | 34,253 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts and sales returns of $453 and $391 |
18,453 | 17,715 | ||||||
Inventories |
12,304 | 10,866 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1,745 | 1,045 | ||||||
Investment in sales-type leases, current portion |
3,504 | 3,397 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
4,195 | 4,238 | ||||||
Total current assets |
71,311 | 71,514 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation of $13,602 and $11,713 |
10,379 | 9,667 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,802 | 2,450 | ||||||
Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $444
and $336 |
6,146 | 1,454 | ||||||
Software development costs, net of accumulated
amortization of $4,038 and $3,566 |
2,623 | 2,534 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
2,566 | 1,898 | ||||||
Investment in sales-type leases, non-current portion |
9,279 | 7,441 | ||||||
Other assets |
940 | 832 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 107,046 | $ | 97,790 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4,912 | $ | 4,479 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
8,697 | 5,761 | ||||||
Deferred service contract revenue, current portion |
3,216 | 2,286 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
16,825 | 12,526 | ||||||
Deferred service contract revenue, non-current portion |
48 | 42 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
1,378 | | ||||||
Total liabilities |
18,251 | 12,568 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized: 50 million
shares; issued and outstanding: 18,123,000 shares and
18,147,000 shares |
181 | 181 | ||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 3.0
million shares; Series A, $0.01 par value; authorized
250,000 shares; issued and outstanding: none |
| | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
89,771 | 87,692 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income |
59 | 560 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(1,216 | ) | (3,211 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
88,795 | 85,222 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 107,046 | $ | 97,790 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited in thousands, except for per share data)
For the three months | ||||||||
ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues |
||||||||
IDD instruments |
$ | 6,806 | $ | 5,136 | ||||
IDD consumables and service |
15,558 | 13,254 | ||||||
Sample processing instruments and supplies |
3,335 | 3,796 | ||||||
Personalized medicine services |
27 | | ||||||
Total revenues |
25,726 | 22,186 | ||||||
Cost of Revenue |
||||||||
IDD instruments |
4,447 | 3,371 | ||||||
IDD consumables and service |
6,425 | 4,955 | ||||||
Sample processing instruments and supplies |
1,521 | 1,678 | ||||||
Personalized medicine services |
174 | | ||||||
Total cost of revenue |
12,567 | 10,004 | ||||||
Gross profit |
13,159 | 12,182 | ||||||
Marketing and selling |
4,956 | 3,832 | ||||||
General and administrative |
4,202 | 3,165 | ||||||
Research and development, net |
3,605 | 2,870 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
12,763 | 9,867 | ||||||
Operating income |
396 | 2,315 | ||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest income |
328 | 215 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(2 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss) and other |
856 | (1 | ) | |||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
1,578 | 2,526 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
654 | 610 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 924 | $ | 1,916 | ||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
||||||||
Change in cumulative translation adjustment |
(225 | ) | 121 | |||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 699 | $ | 2,037 | ||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.11 | ||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.11 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
17,978 | 17,751 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
18,044 | 17,893 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited in thousands, except for per share data)
For the nine months | ||||||||
ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues |
||||||||
IDD instruments |
$ | 22,107 | $ | 16,772 | ||||
IDD consumables and service |
45,274 | 38,658 | ||||||
Sample processing instruments and supplies |
10,986 | 10,673 | ||||||
Personalized medicine services |
27 | | ||||||
Total revenues |
78,394 | 66,103 | ||||||
Cost of Revenue |
||||||||
IDD instruments |
14,194 | 10,656 | ||||||
IDD consumables and service |
18,168 | 15,148 | ||||||
Sample processing instruments and supplies |
4,950 | 5,089 | ||||||
Personalized medicine services |
174 | | ||||||
Total cost of revenue |
37,486 | 30,893 | ||||||
Gross profit |
40,908 | 35,210 | ||||||
Marketing and selling |
14,152 | 11,664 | ||||||
General and administrative |
12,562 | 9,689 | ||||||
Research and development, net |
11,138 | 8,549 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
37,852 | 29,902 | ||||||
Operating income |
3,056 | 5,308 | ||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest income |
844 | 640 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(7 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency transaction gain and other |
183 | 20 | ||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
4,076 | 5,958 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
1,486 | 1,639 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,590 | $ | 4,319 | ||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
||||||||
Change in cumulative translation adjustment |
(501 | ) | 229 | |||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 2,089 | $ | 4,548 | ||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.24 | ||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.24 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
17,947 | 17,701 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
18,056 | 17,874 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited in thousands)
For the nine months | ||||||||
ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,590 | $ | 4,319 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Loss on disposal of fixed assets |
5 | 42 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
48 | | ||||||
Tax (benefit) expense from stock option exercises |
(48 | ) | 609 | |||||
Gain on foreign currency remeasurement |
(105 | ) | | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,084 | 2,606 | ||||||
Common stock and stock-based compensation |
3,193 | 2,780 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(736 | ) | 3,763 | |||||
Inventories |
(1,469 | ) | (3,417 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(725 | ) | 838 | |||||
Investment in sales-type leases |
(1,963 | ) | 127 | |||||
Other assets |
| (100 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
280 | (1,507 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses |
1,737 | (832 | ) | |||||
Deferred service contract revenue |
845 | 324 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
6,736 | 9,552 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Acquisition of business |
(4,630 | ) | | |||||
Purchase of assets from European distributor |
(660 | ) | | |||||
Acquisition of property and equipment |
(2,029 | ) | (2,259 | ) | ||||
Software development costs capitalized |
(554 | ) | (635 | ) | ||||
Sale of short-term investments in marketable securities |
| 2,157 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(7,873 | ) | (737 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Issuance of common stock and warrants for cash |
31 | 750 | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(1,790 | ) | (2,638 | ) | ||||
Tax benefit (expense) from stock option exercises |
48 | (609 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(1,711 | ) | (2,497 | ) | ||||
Net foreign currency translation adjustments |
(295 | ) | 228 | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(3,143 | ) | 6,546 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
34,253 | 24,445 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 31,110 | $ | 30,991 | ||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities: |
||||||||
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
Company
disposed of property and equipment with a cost and
accumulated depreciation of $621 and $616, respectively |
||||||||
Fair value of contingent consideration in connection
with business
acquisition completed in the quarter
ended September 30, 2010 was $1.2 million |
||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
$ | 2,066 | $ | 1,872 | ||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 7 | $ | 7 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Company History
IRIS International, Inc. was incorporated in California in 1979 and reincorporated in 1987 in
Delaware. The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets in vitro diagnostic products,
including imaging systems based on patented and proprietary neural network-based Automated Particle
Recognition (APR) software to enable high-speed digital processing to classify and display images
and describe the morphology of microscopic particles, urine chemistry analyzers and related
chemistry test strips and accessories, molecular diagnostics assays based on the Companys Nucleic
Acid Detection Immuno-Assay (NADiA) technology, as well as special purpose centrifuges and other
small instruments for automating microscopic procedures and DNA processing performed in clinical
laboratories. On July 28, 2010 the Company acquired a high complexity CLIA-certified molecular
pathology laboratory offering differentiated, high value molecular diagnostic services in the
rapidly growing field of personalized medicine. The laboratory provides a direct commercial channel
for the Companys NADIA® technology, with applications in oncology and infectious disease.
2. Interim Financial Reporting
Basis of Presentation The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the
instructions to Form 10-Q under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and do not include
all of the information and note disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States (GAAP). These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes contained in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Consolidated Financial Statements included herein are unaudited, but in the opinion of
management, such financial statements include all adjustments, including normal recurring
adjustments, necessary to summarize fairly the Companys financial position and results of
operations for the interim periods. The results reported in these Consolidated Financial Statements
for the interim periods should not be taken as indicative of results that may be expected for the
entire year.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The
significant estimates in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements relate to the
assessment of the carrying allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, the useful lives,
fair value and recoverability of carrying value of long-lived and intangible assets, including
goodwill, unearned income on sales-type leases, accrued bonuses, estimated provisions for warranty
costs, laboratory information system implementations and deferred tax assets. Actual results and
outcomes may differ from managements estimates and assumptions.
7
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
Earnings Per Share The Company computes and presents earnings per share in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ASC Topic 260, Earnings per share. Basic earnings
per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares and common stock equivalents outstanding, calculated on the
treasury stock method for options and warrants using the average market prices during the period.
The weighted average number of outstanding antidilutive common stock options excluded from the
computation of
diluted net income per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010
were 2,533,000 and 1,823,000, respectively. The weighted average number of outstanding
antidilutive common stock options and warrants excluded from the computation of diluted net income
per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 1,468,000. A
reconciliation of the shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share
is as follows:
For the three | For the nine | |||||||||||||||
months ended | months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
17,978 | 17,751 | 17,947 | 17,701 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive stock options and warrants outstanding |
66 | 142 | 109 | 173 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding
diluted |
18,044 | 17,893 | 18,056 | 17,874 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Hedge The Company conducts business in certain foreign markets, primarily
in Europe and Asia. To mitigate the potential impact of adverse fluctuations in the U.S. Dollar
exchange rate for these currencies, the Company may periodically purchase foreign currency forward
contracts. The Company does not speculate in these hedging instruments in order to profit from
foreign currency exchanges nor does the Company enter into trades for which there are no underlying
exposures.
Under FASB ASC Topic 815, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, the
Company documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its
risk management objective for undertaking these hedging transactions. This process includes
relating the forward contracts that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific
assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted
transactions. The Company also formally assesses, both at the inception of the hedge and on an
ongoing basis, whether each derivative is highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or
cash flows of the hedged items.
At September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not have any foreign currency forward
contracts.
Foreign Currency Exchange Translation The functional currencies of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries are primarily accounted for in their respective local currencies. The statements of
operations of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at rates of exchange in effect
each month. The balance sheets of these subsidiaries are translated at period-end exchange rates,
and the differences from historical exchanges rates are reflected in stockholders equity as other
comprehensive income (loss). Foreign currency transaction gains and losses from certain
intercompany transactions are recorded in foreign currency transaction gain (loss) and other.
Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are recorded based on
rates in effect at the time such transactions arise. Subsequent changes in exchange rates result
in transaction gains and losses and are reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations as unrealized (based on the applicable period-end exchange rate) or realized upon
settlement of the transactions. All other foreign currency gains and losses are also recorded on
foreign currency transaction gain (loss) and other. The Company recognized net foreign currency
transaction gains of $856,000 and $164,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010
which were primarily attributable to volatility in the Euro and British Pound.
8
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
Reclassifications The Company reclassified amounts in segment and geographic information in
prior periods to add the new operating segment, Personalized Medicine (which is further described
in the
Segments and Geographic footnote), to conform to the presentation used in the current period.
The Personalized Medicine composition includes the research and development operations of Iris
Molecular Diagnostics which had been included with the Iris Diagnostics Division (IDD) segment in
prior periods. These reclassifications had no impact on the Companys previously reported income
from operations, net income or basic or diluted earnings per share.
Certain Risks and Uncertainties Financial instruments, which potentially expose the Company
to concentration of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable and investment in sales-type leases. Concentration of credit risk with respect to
accounts receivable and investment in sales-type leases is mitigated by the Companys performance
of on-going credit evaluations of its customers and the Company maintains an allowance for doubtful
accounts. Investments in sales-type leases are secured by the underlying instruments.
Cash balances on deposit with banks are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation up to $250,000. The Company may be exposed to risk for the amount of funds held in one
bank in excess of the insurance limit.
The Company derives most of its revenues from the sale of the urinalysis analyzers, and
related supplies and services. Relatively modest declines in unit sales or gross margins could
have a material adverse effect on the Companys revenues and profits, respectively.
Certain of the Companys components are obtained from outside vendors, and the loss or
breakdown of the Companys relationships with these outside vendors could subject the Company to
substantial delays in the delivery of its products to its customers. Furthermore, certain key
components of the Companys instruments and certain consumables are manufactured by only one
supplier. The Companys inability to sell products to meet delivery schedules could have a
material adverse effect on its reputation in the industry, as well as its financial condition and
results of operation.
3. Acquisition
On July 28, 2010, the Company acquired AlliedPath, Inc. (AlliedPath). AlliedPath is a high
complexity CLIA-certified molecular pathology laboratory offering differentiated, high value
molecular diagnostic services in the rapidly growing field of personalized medicine. Pursuant to
the terms of the merger agreement dated July 26, 2010, the Company acquired all the issued and
outstanding stock of AlliedPath for an amount in cash equal to $4.7 million less certain
indebtedness existing at the closing, with an additional earn-out of up to $1.3 million subject to
the achievement of specific sales and earnings targets through December 2013. We did not assume
any outstanding options or warrants of AlliedPath in connection with the acquisition. In September
2010, AlliedPath changed its name to Arista Labs, Inc. (Arista) which will operate under the
Personalized Medicine reporting segment of the consolidated financial statements.
Through the acquisition of Arista, the Company seeks to achieve the following goals:
| to expand beyond its initial molecular pathology test menu by adding other molecular panels, flow cytometry for the detection and monitoring of leukemia and lymphoma, (F)ISH testing, and proprietary new tests based on the Companys NADiA technology platform; |
| to have better control of all aspects of the commercial operations of the NADiA platform, starting with NADiA ProsVue; |
9
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
| to enable the acceleration of the development efforts of the NADiA technology product pipeline; and |
| to enter the attractive personalized medicine market due to its significant growth potential. |
The aggregate consideration paid for the acquisition of Arista is as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
Cash |
$ | 4,630 | ||
Fair value of contingent consideration |
1,210 | |||
Total purchase price |
$ | 5,840 | ||
Acquisition related expenses included in marketing and sales and general and administrative
total $161,000 and $525,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as of July 28, 2010.
(In thousands) | ||||
Current assets |
$ | 74 | ||
Property and equipment |
523 | |||
Existing technology |
3,090 | |||
CLIA License |
1,604 | |||
Customer relationships |
6 | |||
Non-compete agreements |
100 | |||
Goodwill |
1,352 | |||
Other assets |
31 | |||
Current liabilities |
(316 | ) | ||
Lease obligations |
(178 | ) | ||
Other liabilities |
(61 | ) | ||
Deferred tax liability, net |
(385 | ) | ||
Total purchase price |
$ | 5,840 | ||
The purchase price allocations and pro forma adjustments above are based on preliminary
estimates, available information and certain assumptions, and maybe revised as additional
information becomes available.
In determining the purchase price allocation, the Company considered, among other factors,
historical demand for products, estimates of future demand for those products, customer
relationships, the revenue generating potential of existing technology, the assets useful lives,
and agreements not to compete. The market, income and cost approaches were used to determine fair
values of these intangibles. The rate used to discount the net cash flows to their present value
was a 16.5% weighted average cost of capital for the business as a whole, and from 16.5% to 17.5%
for the individual intangible assets depending on the risk associated with the assets potential to
generate revenues and its projected remaining useful economic life. The weighted average cost of
capital was determined after consideration of market rates of return on debt and equity capital of
comparable companies, the weighted average return on invested capital and the risk associated with
achieving forecasted sales related to technology and assets acquired. The fair value of the
contingent consideration was determined considering the probability of payout and using a 3%
discount rate. Property and equipment net book value was evaluated at approximately fair value on
the acquisition date due to the nature and relative age of the assets acquired.
10
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
Acquired property and equipment are being depreciated on a straight-line basis with estimated
remaining useful lives ranging from 1 year to 5 years. Intangible assets except the CLIA license
are being amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated remaining useful lives ranging from 3
years to 15 years reflecting the expected future value. The CLIA license is considered to have an
indefinite useful life. The purchase was structured as a stock purchase therefore the value
assigned to the existing technology, CLIA license, customers relationships, non-compete agreements
and goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.
Revenue and net loss of Arista included in the Companys consolidated financial statement
since the laboratorys acquisition on July 28, 2010 totaled $27,000 and $1,592,000, respectively,
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The following table summarizes unaudited pro forma financial information assuming the
acquisition of Arista had occurred on January 1, 2009, in the corresponding period of the fiscal
year immediately preceding the acquisition. This unaudited pro forma financial information does
not necessarily represent what would have occurred if the transaction had taken place on January 1,
2009 and should not be taken as representative of the Companys future consolidated results of
operations or financial position.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30 | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 25,731 | $ | 22,186 | $ | 78,425 | $ | 66,103 | ||||||||
Net income |
587 | 1,250 | 930 | 2,602 | ||||||||||||
Net income per basic and diluted share |
$ | 0.03 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.15 |
4. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Finished goods |
$ | 4,656 | $ | 2,595 | ||||
Work-in-process |
283 | 214 | ||||||
Raw materials, parts and sub-assemblies |
7,365 | 8,057 | ||||||
Inventories |
$ | 12,304 | $ | 10,866 | ||||
5. Sales-Type Leases
The components of net investment in sales-type leases consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Total minimum lease payments |
$ | 15,104 | $ | 12,735 | ||||
Less: unearned income |
(2,321 | ) | (1,897 | ) | ||||
Net investment in sales-type leases |
12,783 | 10,838 | ||||||
Less: current portion |
(3,504 | ) | (3,397 | ) | ||||
Net investment in sales-type leases, non-current portion |
$ | 9,279 | $ | 7,441 | ||||
11
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
Future minimum lease payments due from customers under sales-type leases for each of the five
succeeding years:
(In thousands) | ||||
Years Ending December 31, |
||||
2010 (three months remaining) |
$ | 1,013 | ||
2011 |
3,392 | |||
2012 |
2,852 | |||
2013 |
2,411 | |||
2014 |
1,976 | |||
Thereafter |
1,139 | |||
$ | 12,783 | |||
6. Bank Credit Facility
The Company has a credit facility with a commercial bank. The credit facility consists of a
$6.5 million revolving line of credit for working capital and a $10.0 million line of credit for
acquisitions and product opportunities. The credit facility has variable interest rates, which
will change from time to time based on changes to either the LIBOR rate or the lenders prime rate.
Borrowings under the credit facility are secured by all of the Companys assets and mature on June
30, 2012 and June 30, 2015, respectively.
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were no borrowings under the credit
facility. However, the Company is subject to certain financial and non-financial covenants under
the credit facility with the bank and the Company was in compliance with these covenants as of
September 30, 2010.
7. Income Taxes
On a quarterly basis, the Company estimates the effective tax rate for the full fiscal year
and records a quarterly income tax provision based on the anticipated rate. As the fiscal year
progresses, the Company refines its estimate based on the facts and circumstances by each tax
jurisdiction. The effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were
41% and 36%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009 were 24% and 28%, respectively.
The Company will recognize potential interest and penalties related to income tax positions as
a component of the provision for income taxes in the statements of operations in any future periods
in which the Company must record such a liability. Since the Company has not recorded a liability
at September 30, 2010, there was no impact on the Companys effective tax rate.
12
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
8. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718, Stock
Compensation, which requires compensation costs related to share-based transactions, including
employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on fair value.
Share-based compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 includes
incremental share-based compensation expense classified as follows:
For the three | For the nine | |||||||||||||||
months ended | months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
$ | 90 | $ | 113 | $ | 278 | $ | 311 | ||||||||
Marketing and selling |
151 | 161 | 526 | 451 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
533 | 493 | 1,764 | 1,540 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
208 | 179 | 625 | 478 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
$ | 982 | $ | 946 | $ | 3,193 | $ | 2,780 | ||||||||
Stock Options
The Company has a stock option plan under which the Company may grant future non-qualified
stock options, incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights. No stock appreciation rights
have been granted under any of the Companys stock option plans. On July 13, 2007, the Companys
stockholders approved the adoption of the IRIS International, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, which
initially authorized the issuance of up to 1,750,000 shares of common stock pursuant to equity
awards granted under the plan. On May 22, 2009, the Companys stockholders approved an increase of
1,550,000 shares to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for a total of 3,300,000 authorized shares.
The following schedule sets forth options authorized, exercised, outstanding and available for
grant under the Companys existing stock option plans as of September 30, 2010:
Number of Option Shares | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Available | |||||||||||||||
Plan | Authorized | Exercised | Outstanding | for Grant | ||||||||||||
1994 Plan |
700 | 680 | 20 | | ||||||||||||
1998 Plan |
4,100 | 2,717 | 946 | | ||||||||||||
2007 Plan |
3,300 | | 1,725 | 947 | ||||||||||||
8,100 | 3,397 | 2,691 | 947 | |||||||||||||
Stock option activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is as follows:
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||
Exercise | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Price Per | Contractual | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except for per share amounts) | Shares | Share | Term | Value | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
2,205 | $ | 12.97 | 3.7 years | $ | 3,445 | ||||||||||
Granted |
692 | $ | 10.92 | |||||||||||||
Exercised |
(23 | ) | $ | 1.44 | ||||||||||||
Canceled or expired |
(183 | ) | $ | 13.31 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
2,691 | $ | 12.51 | 4.0 years | $ | 1,164 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2010 |
1,576 | $ | 13.63 | 2.7 years | $ | 1,063 | ||||||||||
13
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pretax intrinsic value
(the difference between the closing stock price on September 30, 2010 and the exercise price,
multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option
holders, had all option holders exercised their options on September 30, 2010. Total intrinsic
value of options exercised for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 amounted to $201,000. As
of September 30, 2010, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested
stock options was $4,598,000, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted
average period of approximately 2.76 years.
The Compensation Committee of the board of directors determines the total value of the stock
based compensation grants. The exercise price of options is the closing price on the date the
options are granted. Payment of the exercise price may be made either in cash or with shares of
common stock that have been held at least six months. The options generally vest over four years
and expire between five and ten years from the date of grant. The fair value of each option grant
is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the
following weighted average assumptions:
For the three | ||||||||
months ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Risk free interest rate |
1.46 | % | 2.1 | % | ||||
Expected lives (years) |
4.29 | 4.0 | ||||||
Expected volatility |
56.1 | % | 61.6 | % | ||||
Expected dividend yield |
0 | % | 0 | % |
The expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Companys stock, which
is calculated on a weekly basis. The expected terms of the stock options are based on the average
vesting period on a basis consistent with the historical experience for similar option grants. The
risk-free interest rate is consistent with the expected terms of the stock options and based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The Company estimates forfeiture rates
based on historical data.
A summary of the Companys unvested stock options during the nine months ended September 30,
2010 is as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant Date | ||||||||
Fair Value | ||||||||
(In thousands except for fair value per share) | Shares | Per Share | ||||||
Unvested options at January 1, 2010 |
933 | $ | 11.26 | |||||
Granted |
692 | $ | 11.91 | |||||
Vested |
(403 | ) | $ | 11.40 | ||||
Forfeited or expired |
(107 | ) | $ | 7.76 | ||||
Unvested options at September 30, 2010 |
1,115 | $ | 10.93 | |||||
14
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
Restricted Shares
The Company began awarding restricted shares of its common stock in 2006. In March 2009, the
Company began to grant restricted stock units to its non-employee directors and to certain
employees. Such awards generally require that certain performance conditions and service
conditions be met before the awards vest. Restricted shares currently vest 25% after one year and
61/4% quarterly thereafter.
Restricted stock units currently vest 25% after thirteen months and 61/4% quarterly thereafter.
However, awards to non-employee directors are immediately vested on the grant date. Unvested
restricted shares are forfeited if the recipients employment terminates for any reason other than
death, disability or special circumstances as determined by the Compensation Committee of the
Companys board of directors. Restricted share activity during the nine months ended September 30,
2010 was as follows:
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Grant Date Fair | ||||||||
(in thousands, except for fair value per share) | Shares | Value Per Share | ||||||
Non-vested shares at January 1, 2010 |
248 | $ | 11.44 | |||||
Granted |
171 | $ | 10.94 | |||||
Vested |
(110 | ) | $ | 11.59 | ||||
Forfeited |
(20 | ) | $ | 11.75 | ||||
Non-vested shares at September 30, 2010 |
289 | $ | 11.07 | |||||
Fair value of the Companys restricted shares is based on the Companys closing stock price on
the date of grant. As of September 30, 2010, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense
related to non-vested restricted share grants was $2,974,000 which is expected to be recognized
over the remaining weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years.
9. Common Stock Repurchase Plan
On August 17, 2010, the Companys board of directors authorized a share repurchase and
retirement plan of up to $10 million of the Companys common stock over a 12-month period. During
the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company repurchased 175,196 shares
of common stock at an average price per share of approximately $9.13, for an aggregate amount of approximately $1.6 million.
Subsequent to September 30, 2010 and through November 2, 2010, the Company repurchased an
additional 154,400 shares of common stock for approximately $1.4 million.
10. Shareholders Rights Plan
On September 24, 2010, the Companys board of directors adopted a shareholders rights plan
under which each holder of a share of common stock also has one right to purchase one
one-thousandth of a newly created Series A preferred share at $100 per one one-thousandth of a
share.
The rights are not presently exercisable. Upon the occurrence of certain flip-in events,
each right becomes exercisable which then entitles its holder to receive the number of Series A
preferred shares having an aggregate per share market value price equal to two times the purchase
price. Upon certain flip-over events, each right when exercised entitles its holder to receive
equity securities of the acquiring company having a value equal to two times the purchase price. A
flip-in event includes the acquisition by a person or group (an acquiring person) of 20 percent
or more of the Companys common stock. Rights held by an acquiring person are void. The Company
may redeem the rights for $0.001 per right and may amend the rights under the plan at any time
prior to a triggering event. The rights expire on September 24, 2020.
15
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
11. Contingencies
Litigation
From time to time, the Company is party to certain litigation arising in the normal course of
business. Management believes that the resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Guarantees
The Company enters into indemnification provisions under (i) agreements with other companies
in the ordinary course of business, typically with business partners, contractors, customers and
landlords, and (ii) agreements with investors. Under these provisions, the Company generally
indemnifies and holds harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the
indemnified party as a result of the Companys activities or, in some cases, as a result of the
indemnified partys activities under the agreement. These indemnification provisions often include
indemnifications relating to representations made by the Company with regard to intellectual
property rights. These indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying
agreement. In addition, in some cases, the Company has agreed to reimburse employees for certain
expenses and to provide salary continuation during short-term disability. The maximum potential
amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification
provisions is unlimited. The Company reviews its exposure under these agreements no less than
annually, or more frequently when events indicate. As a result, the Company believes the estimated
fair value of these agreements is not material. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any
liabilities for these agreements as of September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
12. Segments and Geographic Information
The Companys operations are organized on the basis of products and related services and under
FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, the Company operates in three segments: (1) Iris Diagnostics
Division (IDD), (2) Sample Processing and (3) Personalized Medicine.
The IDD segment designs, develops, manufactures, markets and distributes in-vitro diagnostic
systems based on patented and proprietary technology for automating microscopic and clinical
chemistry procedures for urinalysis. The segment also provides ongoing sales of consumables and
services necessary for the operation of installed urinalysis workstations. In the United States,
these products are mostly sold through a direct sales and service force. Internationally, these
products are sold and serviced through distributors, with the exception of France, Germany, United Kingdom
and Puerto Rico.
The Sample Processing segment designs, develops, manufactures and markets a variety of
benchtop centrifuges, small instruments and supplies. These products are used primarily for manual
specimen preparation and dedicated applications in coagulation, cytology, hematology, urinalysis
and DNA processing. These products are sold worldwide through distributors.
The Personalized Medicine segment operates a CLIA-certified laboratory focused on oncology and
molecular diagnostics services in personalized medicine. This segment also includes the research
and development operations of Iris Molecular Diagnostics, or IMD.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates
resources to them based on earnings before income taxes, excluding corporate charges.
16
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
The tables below present information about reported segments for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
Unallocated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sample | Personalized | Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | IDD | Processing | Medicine | Expenses | Total | |||||||||||||||
For the three months ended
September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 22,364 | $ | 3,335 | $ | 27 | $ | | $ | 25,726 | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
11,492 | 1,814 | (147 | ) | | 13,159 | ||||||||||||||
Marketing and selling |
4,166 | 338 | 452 | | 4,956 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,582 | 370 | 657 | 1,593 | 4,202 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development, net |
2,228 | 186 | 1,191 | | 3,605 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
7,976 | 894 | 2,300 | 1,593 | 12,763 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
3,516 | 920 | (2,447 | ) | (1,593 | ) | 396 | |||||||||||||
Interest income |
81 | 6 | | 241 | 328 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
968 | 43 | 91 | 2 | 1,104 | |||||||||||||||
Segment pre-tax income (loss) |
4,689 | 900 | (2,783 | ) | (1,228 | ) | 1,578 | |||||||||||||
Segment assets |
77,538 | 12,021 | 10,727 | 6,760 | 107,046 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in long-lived assets |
25,761 | 433 | 10,481 | | 36,675 | |||||||||||||||
For the three months ended
September 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 18,390 | $ | 3,796 | $ | | $ | | $ | 22,186 | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
10,064 | 2,118 | | | 12,182 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing and selling |
3,561 | 271 | | | 3,832 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,196 | 342 | | 1,627 | 3,165 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development, net |
1,496 | 239 | 1,135 | | 2,870 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
6,253 | 852 | 1,135 | 1,627 | 9,867 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
3,811 | 1,266 | (1,135 | ) | (1,627 | ) | 2,315 | |||||||||||||
Interest income |
9 | 5 | | 201 | 215 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
854 | 67 | | 5 | 926 | |||||||||||||||
Segment pre-tax income (loss) |
3,803 | 1,246 | (1,135 | ) | (1,388 | ) | 2,526 | |||||||||||||
Segment assets |
57,574 | 26,711 | 4,239 | 4,929 | 93,453 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in long-lived assets |
21,383 | 387 | 4,217 | | 25,987 |
17
Table of Contents
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued
Unallocated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sample | Personalized | Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | IDD | Processing | Medicine | Expenses | Total | |||||||||||||||
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 67,381 | $ | 10,986 | $ | 27 | $ | | $ | 78,394 | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
35,019 | 6,036 | (147 | ) | | 40,908 | ||||||||||||||
Marketing and selling |
12,684 | 921 | 547 | | 14,152 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
4,625 | 1,132 | 898 | 5,907 | 12,562 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development, net |
6,686 | 504 | 3,948 | | 11,138 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
23,995 | 2,557 | 5,393 | 5,907 | 37,852 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
11,024 | 3,479 | (5,540 | ) | (5,907 | ) | 3,056 | |||||||||||||
Interest income |
119 | 23 | | 702 | 844 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | (7 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,716 | 137 | 221 | 10 | 3,084 | |||||||||||||||
Segment pre-tax income (loss) |
11,204 | 3,425 | (5,540 | ) | (5,013 | ) | 4,076 | |||||||||||||
Segment assets |
77,538 | 12,021 | 10,727 | 6,760 | 107,046 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in long-lived assets |
25,761 | 433 | 10,481 | | 36,675 | |||||||||||||||
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 55,430 | $ | 10,673 | $ | | $ | | $ | 66,103 | ||||||||||
Gross profit |
29,625 | 5,585 | | | 35,210 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing and selling |
10,865 | 799 | | | 11,664 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
3,678 | 984 | | 5,027 | 9,689 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development, net |
4,620 | 681 | 3,248 | | 8,549 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
19,163 | 2,464 | 3,248 | 5,027 | 29,902 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
10,462 | 3,121 | (3,248 | ) | (5,027 | ) | 5,308 | |||||||||||||
Interest income |
18 | 20 | | 602 | 640 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
| | | (10 | ) | (10 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
2,393 | 201 | | 12 | 2,606 | |||||||||||||||
Segment pre-tax income (loss) |
10,440 | 3,076 | (3,248 | ) | (4,310 | ) | 5,958 | |||||||||||||
Segment assets |
57,574 | 26,711 | 4,239 | 4,929 | 93,453 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in long-lived assets |
21,383 | 387 | 4,217 | | 25,987 |
The Company ships products from two locations in the United States and one location in
Germany. Substantially all long-lived assets are located in the United States. Sales to
international customers amounted to approximately $26.3 million and $22.2 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Sales to international customers amounted
to approximately $8.5 million and $7.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. Personalized medicine services are performed in the United States.
Segment assets attributed to corporate unallocated expenses are deferred taxes. Long-lived
assets include property and equipment, intangible assets, long-term portion of inventory and other
long-term assets. Deferred income tax is excluded from long-lived assets.
13. Subsequent Events
The Company considers events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but
before the financial statements are issued to provide additional evidence relative to certain
estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure. The Company evaluated
subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued.
18
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
This report
includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All
statements other than statements of historical facts are “forward-looking
statements” for purposes of these provisions, including any projections
of earnings, revenues or other financial items, any statement of the plans and
objectives of management for future operations, any statements concerning
proposed new products or strategic arrangements, any statements regarding
future economic conditions or performance, and any statement of assumptions
underlying any of the foregoing. In some cases, forward-looking statements can
be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,”
“will,” “expects,” “plans,”
“anticipates,” “estimates,” “potential,”
“intends”, or “continue” or the negative thereof or
other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations
reflected in the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable,
there can be no assurance that such expectations or any of the forward-looking
statements will prove to be correct, and actual results could differ materially
from those projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements. Our future
financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking
statements, are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, including but not
limited to the Risk Factors set forth under Item 1A, and for the reasons
described elsewhere in this report. All forward-looking statements and reasons
why results may differ included in this report are made as of the date hereof,
and we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements or
reasons why actual results might differ.
Overview
IRIS International, Inc. consists of three operating units in three business segments as
determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting. Our in-vitro diagnostics
segment also called Iris Diagnostics Division (IDD), designs, manufactures and markets systems,
consumables and supplies for urinalysis and body fluids. Our Sample Processing segment markets
small centrifuges and other processing equipment and accessories for rapid specimen processing.
With the acquisition of our CLIA laboratory in July 2010, we have created a Personalized Medicine
segment combining the research and development operations of our Iris Molecular Diagnostics
subsidiary and Arista Labs, Inc. (Arista). Under this new segment we consolidate all operations
for the development and commercialization of cancer diagnostic testing services and related
products.
Our core business is in the urinalysis market and we are the leading worldwide provider of
automated urine microscopy systems, with more than 2,900 iQ microscopy analyzers shipped to date in
over 50 countries. We generate revenues primarily from sales of instruments, consumables and
service and sample processing instruments and supplies. Revenues from instruments include global
sales of urine microscopy analyzers and sales of chemistry analyzers manufactured by us and a urine
chemistry analyzer, the AUTION MAX AX-4280, sourced from a Japanese manufacturer for the U.S.
market only. We have secured sufficient inventory of the AUTION MAX AX-4280 to cover our estimated
U.S. sales of fully automated chemistry analyzers through the end of 2010. We initiated
international sales of the iChem®VELOCITY, our proprietary fully-automated chemistry analyzer in
September 2008 and have sold over 300 units to date. Sales of this instrument in the United States
will be initiated upon us attaining U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance of our 510(k)
application submitted on June 30, 2010. Our consumables offering includes products such as chemical
reagents, urine test strips, calibrators and controls. Service revenues are derived primarily from
annual service contracts purchased by our domestic customers after the initial year of sale, which
is covered by product warranty, and spare parts purchased by international customers. Once the
analyzers are installed, we generate recurring revenue from sales of consumables. Consumable and
service revenue should continue to expand as the installed base of related instruments increases.
Revenue is also generated from sales of Sample Processing instruments and related supplies and
consumables, which primarily consists of centrifuge systems, DNA processing workstations and blood
analysis products.
In
the United States, France, Germany, United Kingdom and Puerto Rico sales of our urinalysis systems are direct to the end-user through our
sales force. All other international sales are through independent distributors. In January 2010, we completed
the purchase of certain European assets relating to the distribution of products in the United
Kingdom, Ireland and Germany. The assets purchased consisted primarily of installed instruments
leased to customers, the related lease agreements and service contracts. We paid $660,000 for
these assets and recorded them within property and equipment. Our incremental revenue relating to
the acquired distributors business was $600,000 and $1,614,000 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010. International sales represented 34% of consolidated revenues during the nine
month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Since the majority of international sales are
made through independent distributors, gross profit margin is lower than domestic sales of the same
products, but we incur minimal sales and marketing costs for such sales. Our Sample Processing
products are sold worldwide primarily through distributors and OEM partners.
19
Table of Contents
We are developing a prostate cancer prognostic diagnostic test, called NADiA ProsVue, to
monitor levels of PSA, that presently are undetectable with current testing methods, in men with
prostate
cancer who have undergone radical prostatectomy, or removal of the prostate gland. We met
with the FDA on several occasions to review our NADiA ProsVue Pre-Investigational Device Exemption
(Pre-IDE) submission and reached an agreement in principle on the product claim and clinical end
points to be used in a large clinical study. We conducted a multi-center retrospective clinical
study consisting of approximately 300 patients with serially collected blood samples, retained over
an eight year period and we believe the study data meets the pre-established primary and secondary
end points. On April 28, 2010, we submitted our NADiA ProsVue 510(k) pre-market notification
application to the FDA requesting clearance of a prognostic claim. In June 2010, we received a
letter from the FDA requesting additional information on this matter. We have responded to the
FDAs additional information inquiry and met with the FDA in November 2010. At this meeting
the FDA again requested additional information, which we expect to provide by year end.
On July 28, 2010, we acquired Arista Labs, Inc., a state-of-theart high complexity
CLIA-certified laboratory focused on oncology testing services for an amount in cash equal to $4.7
million less certain indebtedness existing at the closing, with an additional earn-out of up to
$1.3 million subject to the achievement of specific sales and earnings targets through December
2013. Arista offers differentiated, high value molecular diagnostic services in personalized
medicine. This acquisition strategically provides a direct commercial channel for our
NADiA® ultra-sensitive nucleic acid detection immunoassay platform, beginning with NADiA
ProsVue and provides better control over all aspects of the commercial operations. In addition, we
believe the laboratory should accelerate the development efforts of the current NADiA product
pipeline.
Since the acquisition, the laboratorys sales and marketing team has expanded to ten
professionals. In addition, Arista is planning to expand its test menu with additional molecular
panels, flow cytometry for detection and monitoring of leukemia and lymphoma, (F)ISH testing and
proprietary new tests based on the NADIA technology platform.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles and our discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations require us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the
amounts reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We
base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities. We regularly discuss with our audit committee the
basis of our estimates. Actual results may differ from these estimates and such differences may be
material.
A description of our critical accounting policies that represent the more significant
judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements was provided in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. There have been no material
changes in these critical accounting policies since December 31, 2009.
20
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes results of operations data for the periods indicated. The
percentages in the table are based on total revenues, with the exception of percentages for gross
profit margins, which are computed on related revenue, and income taxes, which are based on income
before taxes.
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IDD instruments |
$ | 6,806 | 27% | $ | 5,136 | 23% | $ | 22,107 | 28% | $ | 16,772 | 25% | ||||||||||||||||||||
IDD consumables and service |
15,558 | 60% | 13,254 | 60% | 45,274 | 58% | 38,658 | 59% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sample Processing instruments and supplies |
3,335 | 13% | 3,796 | 17% | 10,986 | 14% | 10,673 | 16% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personalized medicine |
27 | 0% | | 0% | 27 | 0% | | 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
25,726 | 100% | 22,186 | 100% | 78,394 | 100% | 66,103 | 100% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IDD instruments |
2,359 | 35% | 1,765 | 34% | 7,913 | 36% | 6,116 | 36% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
IDD consumables and service |
9,133 | 59% | 8,299 | 63% | 27,106 | 60% | 23,510 | 61% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sample Processing instruments and supplies |
1,814 | 54% | 2,118 | 56% | 6,036 | 55% | 5,584 | 52% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personalized medicine |
(147 | ) | nm | | 0% | (147 | ) | nm | | 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
13,159 | 51% | 12,182 | 55% | 40,908 | 52% | 35,210 | 53% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and selling |
4,956 | 19% | 3,832 | 17% | 14,152 | 18% | 11,664 | 18% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
4,202 | 16% | 3,165 | 14% | 12,562 | 16% | 9,689 | 15% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development, net |
3,605 | 14% | 2,870 | 13% | 11,138 | 14% | 8,549 | 13% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
12,763 | 50% | 9,867 | 44% | 37,852 | 48% | 29,902 | 45% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
396 | 2% | 2,315 | 10% | 3,056 | 4% | 5,308 | 8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other (expense) income |
1,182 | 5% | 211 | 1% | 1,020 | 1% | 650 | 1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
1,578 | 6% | 2,526 | 11% | 4,076 | 5% | 5,958 | 9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes (2) |
654 | 41% | 610 | 24% | 1,486 | 36% | 1,639 | 28% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 924 | 4% | $ | 1,916 | 9% | $ | 2,590 | 3% | $ | 4,319 | 7% | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Gross profit margin percentages are based on the related sales of each category. | |
(2) | Income tax percentage is computed based on the relationship of income taxes to pre-tax income. |
Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 to Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
Consolidated revenues for the third quarter of 2010 increased 16% to $25.7 million as compared
to $22.2 million in the prior year period. IDD urinalysis segment revenues increased 22% to $22.4
million in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to $18.4 million in the prior year quarter. The
current year quarter IDD revenues include approximately $600,000 incremental revenue related to the
acquisition of the European distributor operations earlier this year. IDD instruments revenues
increased 33% to $6.8 million in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to $5.1 million in the prior
year quarter. The continued increase in IDD instrument sales is primarily driven by strong
domestic sales versus a year ago period due to new marketing and sales initiatives and improvement
in the U.S. medical capital equipment market environment.
21
Table of Contents
IDD consumables and service revenues increased 17% to a record $15.6 million in the third
quarter of 2010 as compared to $13.3 million in the prior year quarter. This continued increase is
primarily driven by the larger installed base of instruments both domestically and internationally
and increased sales of iChemVELOCITY test strips due to increased placements of our iChemVELOCITY
analyzer in the international market.
Revenues from Sample Processing instruments and supplies decreased 12% to $3.3 million in the
third quarter of 2010 as compared to $3.8 million in the prior year quarter, due to the lower
demand from some of our OEM partners.
Personalized Medicine service revenues in the third quarter of 2010 totaled $27,000. This is
the first quarter in which we recognized revenues related to our acquisition of Arista.
Overall gross profit margin was 51% in the third quarter of 2010 compared to 55% in the prior
year quarter, primarily the result of the negative effect of foreign currency fluctuations,
increased costs relating to our start up of direct commercial operations in Europe, as well as
lower volume at our Sample Processing division.
The gross profit margin of our IDD instruments was 35% in the third quarter of 2010 compared
to 34% in the prior year quarter. Instruments gross margins were favorably affected by higher
instrument volume and a greater mix of direct domestic sales versus international sales through
distributors, partially offset by increased costs from foreign sourced products due to the
weakening of the U.S. dollar.
The gross profit margin of our IDD consumables and services was 59% in the third quarter of
2010 as compared to 63% in the prior year quarter, primarily resulting from increased costs from
foreign sourced products due to the weaker U.S. dollar as well as an increase in service costs
related to our direct commercial operations in the United Kingdom and Germany. In addition, the
prior year period benefited from cost reductions in our service area.
Gross profit margin for our Sample Processing segment decreased to 54% in the third quarter of
2010, as compared to 56% in the prior year period, due primarily to a decrease in volume.
Marketing and selling expenses increased to $5.0 million, or 19% of revenues, in the third
quarter of 2010 as compared to $3.8 million, or 17% of revenues, for the third quarter 2009. The
increase primarily results from $452,000 of expenses related to the newly acquired Arista
operations, additional personnel and related costs of $530,000 related to our new direct sales
operations in the United Kingdom and Germany and higher commissions and GPO fees of $227,000
resulting from increased revenues.
General and administrative expenses increased to $4.2 million, or 16% of revenues, in the
third quarter of 2010 as compared to $3.2 million, or 14% of revenues, in the third quarter of
2009. The increase primarily relates to $65,000 and $592,000 in acquisition and operating expenses,
respectively, relating to the Arista acquisition, $249,000 in personnel and related costs from
additions in information technology, quality assurance and regulatory affairs, and $222,000 in
recruiting and relocation expenses.
Research and development expenses increased to $3.6 million, or 14% of revenues in the third
quarter of 2010 as compared to $2.9 million, or 13% of revenues in the third quarter of 2009. The
increase is primarily attributable to $346,000 in clinical product development, research materials
and consulting, and an increase in personnel and related costs of $387,000. These incremental
expenses are primarily related to the submission of a new 510(k) for the iChemVELOCITY and the
development of our 3GEMS Urinalysis and Hematology platforms.
22
Table of Contents
Unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations negatively impacted the 2010 third quarter operating
results by $210,000, net, related to foreign sourced products and our foreign direct sales
operations, which amounts is reflected in revenues, cost of goods sold and operating expenses.
Interest income increased in the third quarter of 2010 to $328,000 from $215,000 for the third
quarter of 2009, due primarily to higher average cash balances during the period and an increase in
sales type leases.
Foreign exchange gains and other totaled $856,000 for the third quarter of 2010 and primarily
resulting from the effect of favorable foreign currency fluctuations on U.S. dollar denominated
intercompany balances.
Income tax expense for the third quarter of 2010 increased to 41% of pre-tax income as
compared to 24% of pre-tax income for the prior year period primarily due to the research and
development tax credits not being extended this year for federal income tax purposes and a
favorable change in estimated available research and development tax credits recorded in the prior
year quarter.
Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Consolidated revenues for the first nine months of 2010 increased 19% to $78.4 million as
compared to $66.1 million in the prior year period. IDD urinalysis segment revenues increased 22%
to $67.4 million in the first nine months of 2010 as compared to $55.4 million in the prior year
period. The current year-to-date IDD revenues include approximately $1.6 million incremental
revenue related to the acquisition of the European distributor operations earlier this year. IDD
instruments revenues increased 32% to $22.1 million as compared to $16.8 million during the prior
year period. The increase in IDD instrument sales is primarily driven by stronger international
and domestic sales as compared to the prior year due to new marketing and sale initiatives and the
improvement in the global hospital spending environment.
IDD consumables and service revenue increased 17% to $45.3 million in the first nine months of
2010 as compared to $38.7 million in the prior year period. This increase is primarily driven by
the larger installed base of instruments both domestically and internationally and higher sales of
iChemVELOCITY strips due to increased placements of our iChemVELOCITY analyzer in the international
market.
Revenues for our Sample Processing segment increased 3% to $11.0 million in the first nine
months of 2010 as compared to $10.7 million in the prior year period. The increase is primarily
attributable to higher instrument and service parts sales partially offset by lower consumable
sales from some of our OEM partners.
Personalized Medicine revenues in the first nine months of 2010 totaled $27,000 and resulted
from our acquisition of Arista.
Overall gross profit margins for the first nine months of 2010 decreased to 52% as compared to
53% for the prior year period.
The gross profit margin of our IDD instruments remained at 36% for the first nine months of
2010 as compared to the prior year period. Instrument gross margins were favorably affected by
higher instrument volume and a greater mix of direct domestic sales versus international sales
through distributors, partially offset by increased costs from foreign sourced products due to the
weakening of the U.S. dollar.
23
Table of Contents
The gross profit margin of our IDD consumables and services totaled 60% during the first nine
months of 2010, as compared to 61% during the prior year period, primarily resulting from increased
costs of foreign sourced products due to the weaker U.S. dollar as well as an increase in service
costs related to our direct commercial operations in the United Kingdom and Germany, partially
offset by the favorable impact of increased revenues.
Gross profit margin for our Sample Processing instrument and supplies segment increased to 55%
for the first nine months of 2010 as compared to 52% for the prior year period, primarily due to
increased revenue from higher margin service parts as well as cost savings from the implementation
of lean manufacturing initiatives.
Marketing and selling expenses totaled $14.2 million, or 18% of revenue, for the first nine
months of 2010, as compared to $11.7 million, or 18% of revenue, for the prior year period. The
increase primarily results from $547,000 of expenses related to the newly acquired Arista
operations, $1.4 million in additional personnel and related expenses from the initiation of direct
sales in the United Kingdom and Germany in order to support the long-term commercial strategy of
our international business, and $501,000 of increased commissions and GPO fees on higher sales.
General and administrative expenses increased for the first nine months of 2010 to $12.6
million, or 16% of revenue, as compared to $9.7 million for the prior year period, or 15% of
revenue. The increase primarily relates to $291,000 and $607,000 in acquisition and operating
expenses, respectively relating to the Arista acquisition, $381,000 of CFO severance and related
transition expenses, $1.1 million of personnel and related costs from additions in information
technology, quality assurance and regulatory affairs, and $475,000 of recruiting and relocation
expenses.
Research and development expense amounted to $11.1 million, or 14% of revenue, for the first
nine months 2010, as compared to $8.5 million, or 13% of revenue, in the prior year period. The
increase was primarily attributable to $1.2 million in clinical product development, research
materials and consulting and increases in personnel and related costs of $1.2 million The
increased expenses primarily relate to the submission of a new 510(k)s for the iChemVELOCITY and
our NADiA platform and the simultaneous development of our 3GEMS Urinalysis and Hematology
platforms.
Unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations negatively impacted the 2010 year-to-date operating
results by $520,000, net, related to foreign sourced products and our foreign direct sales
operations, which amounts is reflected in revenues, cost of goods sold and operating expenses.
Interest income increased for the first nine months of 2010 to $844,000 from $641,000 in the
prior year period, primarily due to higher average cash balances and an increase in sales type
leases.
Foreign exchange gains and other totaled $182,000 in the first nine months of 2010 and relate
primarily to realized favorable foreign currency transactions.
Income tax expense during the first nine months of 2010 increased to 36% of pre-tax income as
compared to 28% of pre-tax income for the prior year period primarily due to the research and
development tax credits not being extended for federal income tax purposes and a favorable change
in estimated available research and development tax credits recorded in the prior year period.
24
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary source of liquidity is cash from operations, which depends heavily on sales of our
IDD instruments, consumables and service, as well as sales of sample processing instruments and
supplies. At September 30, 2010, our cash and cash equivalents amounted to $31.1 million compared
to $34.3 million at December 31, 2009.
Adverse global macroeconomic forces have been impacting our selling markets and the credit
markets of our customers and distributors. Although we have experienced a recovery in medical
capital equipment sales, we continue to face the following challenges: deferrals of purchases due
to decreases in capital budgets of our customers, delays in the purchasing cycle due to greater
scrutiny of deals and
increased internal competition for limited capital dollars, and an increase in requests for
quotes for operating leases. The aforementioned factors may lead to a decrease in revenue, an
increase of deferred revenue, and/or could lead to installment cash collections that would affect
our liquidity and capital resources.
Operating Cash Flows. Cash provided by operations for the first nine months of 2010 decreased
to $6.8 million, as compared to cash provided by operations of $9.6 million for the prior year
period. The decrease primarily results from lower net income of $1.7 million and the decrease of
$660,000 in tax benefit from stock option exercises. As of September 30, 2010, the number of days
sales in accounts receivable decreased to 66 days compared to 68 days for the first nine months of
the prior year. The number of days sales in accounts receivable varies and may increase with
the longer payment terms to our international distributors and end users.
Investing Activities. Cash used by investing activities totaled $7.9 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, a $7.1 million increase as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, due primarily to the acquisition of Arista for $4.6 million and the purchase of
assets from a European distributor for $660,000, and the $2.2 million sale of marketable securities
in the first nine months of 2009 which did not occur in the 2010 period.
Financing Activities. Cash used in financing activities totaled $1.7 million during the first
nine months of 2010, a $786,000 million decrease from the prior year period, primarily the result
of an $848,000 decrease in repurchases of common stock and lower tax expense from stock option
exercises.
We currently have a credit facility with a commercial bank consisting of a $6.5 million
revolving line of credit for working capital and a $10.0 million line of credit for acquisitions
and product opportunities. The credit facility has variable interest rates, which will change from
time to time based on changes to either the LIBOR rate or the lenders prime rate. As of September
30, 2010, there were no borrowings under the credit facility. We are subject to certain financial
and non-financial covenants under the credit facility with the bank and as of September 30, 2010,
we were in compliance with these covenants.
In August 2010, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase plan which resulted in
our purchasing of an aggregate of 175,196 shares of our common stock for approximately $1.6 million
during the third quarter of 2010. The remainder of the common stock repurchased in 2010 relates to
the withholding of common shares for payment of personal income taxes upon vesting of restricted
stock grants.
In 2008, our board of directors authorized two stock repurchase plans which resulted in our
purchase of an aggregate of 983,579 shares of our common stock for approximately $11.9 million
during 2008, and an additional 250,800 shares of our common stock for approximately $2.5 million
during 2009.
We believe that our current cash on hand, together with cash generated from operations and
cash available under the credit facility with the bank will be sufficient to fund normal operations
for the foreseeable future. However, additional funding may be required to fund expansion of our
business. There is no assurance that such funding will be available on terms acceptable to us.
25
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At September 30, 2010 and 2009, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities
or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special
purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance
sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not exposed to any financing,
liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses which amends ASC Topic 310, Receivables. ASU
2010-20 requires disclosures about the nature of the credit risk in an entitys financing
receivables, how that risk is incorporated into the allowance for credit losses, and the reasons
for any changes in the allowance. Disclosure is required to be disaggregated, primarily at the
level at which an entity calculates its allowance for credit losses.
ASU 2010-20 is applicable to both private and public companies, and will affect any entity
that has financing receivables on its balance sheet, not including short-term trade accounts
receivable. Public entities must apply the disclosure requirements applicable to period-end
balances beginning with the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December
15, 2010 (December 31, 2010 for a calendar year-end entity). We are currently evaluating both the
timing and the impact of the adoption of the ASU on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include
Software Elements, now codified under FASB ASC Topic 985, Software. ASU 2009-14, removes tangible
products from the scope of software revenue guidance and provides guidance on determining whether
software deliverables in an arrangement that includes a tangible product are covered by the scope
of the software revenue guidance. ASU 2009-14 is to be applied on a prospective basis for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15,
2010, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating both the timing and the impact of
the adoption of the ASU on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which
amends ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, to require companies to allocate revenue in
multiple-element arrangements based on an elements estimated selling price if vendor-specific or
other third-party evidence of value is not available. ASU 2009-13 is effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Earlier application is permitted. We are currently
evaluating both the timing and the impact of the adoption of the ASU on our consolidated financial
statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk
Our business is exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates and
foreign currency exchange rates. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in
market rates and prices, such as interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not
invest in derivatives, foreign currency forward contracts or other financial instruments for
trading or speculative purposes. We had no debt at September 30, 2010, thus were not subject to
market risk for changes in interest rates on debt obligations. We are subject to market risk for
changes in interest rates on our short-term investment portfolio. We invest our excess cash in
certificates of deposit and, on occasion, other short-term investments, and the market value of
these investments fluctuates based on changes in interest rates.
26
Table of Contents
Foreign Currencies
We conduct business in certain foreign markets, primarily in the European Union and Asia. Our
primary exposure to foreign currency risk relates to our foreign subsidiaries that transact
business in a functional currency other than the U.S. Dollar, primarily the Euro and British Pound
and that have U.S. dollar denominated intercompany balances. We are subject to certain foreign
currency risks in the importation of goods from Japan and as a result of commercial operations in
Europe and Asia. Our purchases from a major Japanese supplier are denominated in Japanese Yen.
These components represent a significant portion of our material costs. All of our sales are
denominated in U.S. Dollars with the exception of France, Germany, United Kingdom and Ireland,
where sales are denominated in Euros and British Pound. Fluctuations in the U.S. Dollar exchange
rate for Japanese Yen, Euro and British Pound could result in increased costs for our key
components and increased costs for commercial operations in Europe.
The functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries are primarily accounted for in their
respective local currencies. The statements of operations of foreign operations are translated
into U.S. dollars at rates of exchange in effect each month. The balance sheets of these
subsidiaries are translated at period-end exchange rates, and the differences from historical
exchange rates are reflected in stockholders equity as other comprehensive income (loss). Foreign
currency transaction gains and losses from certain intercompany transactions are recorded in
foreign currency exchange (loss) and other. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the
functional currency are recorded based on rates in effect at the time such transactions arise.
Subsequent changes in exchange rates result in transaction gains and losses are reflected in the
statements of operations as unrealized (based on the applicable period-end exchange rate) or
realized upon settlement of the transactions. All other foreign currency gains and losses are also
recorded in foreign currency transaction (loss) and other.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined by paragraph (e) of Rules 13a-15(f)
or 15d-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, designed to ensure that we
are able to collect the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file with the SEC
and to approve, summarize and disclose this information within the time periods specified in the
rules of the SEC. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are responsible for
establishing and maintaining these procedures, and, as required by the rules of the SEC, evaluate
their effectiveness. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2010, the end of the
period covered by this report, and based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 that materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
27
Table of Contents
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to a
variety of risks and uncertainties. Other actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in those forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set
forth in the risk factors relating to our business and common stock contained in Item 1A of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, supplemented by the following
additional risk factors relating to our recently acquired Arista laboratory business.
Risks Related to Our Laboratory Business
Changes in healthcare laws, regulations or policies, or third-party payor policies could
affect coverage or reimbursement for our specialized laboratory tests and adversely affect our
financial results.
Government payors, including Medicare and Medicaid and third-party payors, such as insurance
companies, have historically implemented measures to control the cost, utilization and delivery of
healthcare services. In the past, Congress has implemented changes to healthcare laws, which have
resulted in amendments to the Medicare fee schedule, new administrative requirements and added
costs for healthcare service providers. In the future, additional Congressional intervention may
results in further reductions of reimbursement rates and additional costs to operate clinical
laboratories like Arista. These changes have, and in the future may have, adversely affected
coverage for the specialized tests that we offer.
Any changes to the current healthcare laws and regulations may necessitate a change to our
business model.
The clinical laboratory industry is a highly regulated industry. Our clinical laboratory is
subject to numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including with respect to
anti-kickback, billing and claims, privacy, security and electronic transactions (including HIPAA),
and the regulation of laboratories, including CLIA. While we believe that we are currently in
compliance with all of these laws and regulations, they may be, or the way the courts interpret
these laws and regulations, may be, changed or amended at anytime. Any such changes may
necessitate a change to our business model, which may adversely affect our business, prospects and
the results of our operations.
We may incur substantial penalties including fines or possible debarment from Medicare or
Medicaid if we violate certain government payor laws and regulations.
We are required to comply with a number of different government regulations relating to
billing practices and relationships with physicians and hospitals. Violations of these regulations
can lead to civil penalties, criminal liability and possible disbarment from participation in
Medicare and Medicaid. If we were ever determined to be in violation of these regulations our
relationship with many of our clients would be severely affected and we could face a material
adverse effect to our financial condition or results of operations.
28
Table of Contents
Our laboratory business may be harmed if we are unable to comply with certain healthcare
related laws and regulations, including the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act of 1967 and the
Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (collectively, CLIA).
Arista is regulated and licensed by a number of federal and state statutes and regulations,
including CLIA. If a clinical laboratory fails to comply with CLIA requirement or state healthcare
and licensing laws and regulations, it can have its license suspended or revoked. At this time we
believe that we comply with these laws and regulations. If these laws or regulations are amended,
we may have to change the manner in which we conduct our laboratory business, which could lead to
additional expenses in running our laboratory business. If we are unable to properly comply with
these changes, we could have our licenses suspended or revoked, which would adversely affect our
laboratory operations.
We face possible litigation, penalties and damage to our reputation with payors, physicians
and patients if we are unable to properly protect customer-related information.
Arista receives a variety of personal information about our customers. We believe that we have
a strong security system in place and that we comply with all federal and state laws and
regulations relating to the protection of personal information (including HIPAA). However, if there
was a breach of our security system or we inadvertently released protected patient information, we
face possible monetary fines, litigation and damage to our reputation.
We face possible litigation, penalties and medical malpractice for errors in laboratory
testing results.
Arista utilizes the best practices in quality assurance to avoid and prevent errors in test
results. However, if the laboratory produces an inadvertent erroneous result, this can adversely
affect a patients diagnosis and treatment and may result in medical malpractice litigation for
which fines and damages can be substantial and could exceed the limits of our medical malpractice
insurance coverage, causing substantial damage to the our financial condition.
The nature of the testing performed in our laboratory is complex and often depends on our
ability to obtain specialized reagents from a sole source provider. Any disruption of supply, or
discontinuance of products by a sole source may severely impact Aristas ability to provide testing
services.
Many of the tests performed by our laboratory are not commercially available and are
laboratory-developed tests (LDT). Often LDTs rely on specialized reagents or products that are
supplied by a single source. Any disruption in our ability to obtain these specialized reagents
may result in the laboratorys inability to continue to perform such testing, or may require that
the laboratory change its testing protocol to perform the testing using a different reagent. In
either case, this can severely affect our financial performance or harm our relationship with our
customers.
Federal, state and CLIA regulations define certain personnel standards that our laboratory
must adhere to, including education, background and experience requirements. Our ability to
attract, hire and maintain critical personnel may limit the testing our laboratory can perform.
The laboratory relies on its ability to attract, hire and keep certain critical personnel such
as Medical Directors and Pathologists, and licensed laboratory personnel who have appropriate
advanced degrees and years of experience necessary to satisfy CLIA requirements and certain state
requirements. If the laboratory cannot attract, hire and maintain these critical employees, then
the laboratorys ability to perform certain testing may be severely limited. This can damage the
laboratorys reputation with its customers and severely impact our financial performance.
29
Table of Contents
The laboratory industry is highly competitive and many other laboratories offer the same
testing that our laboratory offers. Our ability to discriminate our laboratory in a cluttered
marketplace
may limit our ability to attract and maintain customers and will have a material adverse
effect on our financial performance.
There are many competitors currently offering the same menu of testing and in some cases a
larger menu of tests than Arista. Our ability to distinguish our laboratory from our competitors
is critical to our financial performance.
We have a limited operating history in our laboratory business and have experienced operating
losses making it difficult to evaluate whether we will operate profitably.
Arista was recently formed. Arista was established in March 2008 and commenced operation of
its clinical laboratory business in November of 2008. Arista began testing services in August 2009
upon receiving its CLIA license. Because Arista only recently commenced its principal operations,
we do not have a meaningful historical record of sales and revenues nor an established business
track record. While we believe that we have the opportunity to be successful in the specialized,
cancer-focused molecular diagnostics segment of the clinical laboratory industry, there can be no
assurance that we will be successful in accomplishing our business initiatives, or that we will be
able to achieve any significant levels of revenues or net income, from the sale of Aristas
products and services.
Unanticipated problems, expenses and delays are frequently encountered in increasing marketing
and sales efforts and developing new products, especially in the current stages of our business.
Our ability to continue to successfully develop, produce and sell our products and to generate
significant operating revenues will depend on our ability to, among other matters, successfully
market and sell our services to medical providers.
Given the limited operating history of Arista, lack of long-term sales history and other
sources of revenue, there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve any of our goals and
develop a sufficiently large customer base to be profitable.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On August 17, 2010, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase and retirement plan
of up to $10 million of our common stock over a 12-month period. During the three months ended
September 30, 2010, we repurchased 175,196 shares of common stock at an average price per share of
approximately $9.13, for an aggregate amount of approximately $1.6 million. As of September 30,
2010, we may repurchase an additional $8.4 million of our common stock before expiration of the 2010
share repurchase plan in August 2011.
30
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit | Reference | |||||||
Number | Description | Document | ||||||
2.1 | Merger Agreement, dated July 26, 2010, by and among
Iris International, Inc., AlliedPath Inc., and API
Acquisition Corp. In accordance with Item
601(b)(2) of Regulation S-X, the disclosure
schedules to the Merger Agreement have not been
filed. The Merger Agreement contains a list
briefly identifying the contents of all omitted
disclosure schedules and Iris International, Inc.
hereby agrees to furnish a supplemental copy of any
omitted disclosure schedule to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.
|
(1 | ) | |||||
4.1 | Rights Agreement, dated as of September 24, 2010,
between the Registrant and Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent,
including the Certificate of Designation of Rights,
Preferences and Privileges of Series A Preferred
Stock, the Form of Rights Certificate, and the
Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock,
attached thereto as Exhibits A, B and C,
respectively.
|
(2 | ) | |||||
10.1 | | Employment Agreement, dated July 28, 2010, by and
between Iris International, Inc. and Vance Randal
White.
|
(3 | ) | ||||
10.2 | | Employment Agreement, dated July 28, 2010, by and
between Iris International, Inc. and Philip
Ginsburg.
|
(4 | ) | ||||
10.3 | Change in Terms Agreement, dated August 31, 2010,
by and between IRIS International, Inc. and
California Bank & Trust.
|
(5 | ) | |||||
10.4 | Commercial Guaranty, dated August 31, 2010, by IRIS
Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.
|
(6 | ) | |||||
10.5 | Commercial Security Agreement, dated August 31,
2010, by and among IRIS Molecular Diagnostics,
Inc., IRIS International, Inc. and California Bank
& Trust.
|
(7 | ) | |||||
10.6 | | Third Amendment to Key Employee Agreement for Cesar
M. Garcia effective May 14, 2010 between IRIS
International, Inc. and Cesar M. Garcia.
|
(8 | ) | ||||
10.7 | | Amendment to Key Employee Agreement for Robert
Mello, effective May 14, 2010 between IRIS
International, Inc. and Robert Mello.
|
(9 | ) | ||||
10.8 | | Amendment to Key Employee Agreement for Thomas
Warekois, effective May 14, 2010 between IRIS
International, Inc. and Thomas Warekois.
|
(10 | ) | ||||
10.9 | | Amendment to Key Employee Agreement for John Yi,
effective May 14, 2010 between IRIS International,
Inc. and John Yi.
|
(11 | ) | ||||
10.10 | | Key Employee Agreement for Thomas H. Adams, PhD,
dated September 2, 2010 between IRIS International,
Inc. and Thomas H. Adams, Ph.D.
|
(12 | ) | ||||
31.1 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive
Officer
|
* |
31
Table of Contents
Exhibit | Reference | |||||||
Number | Description | Document | ||||||
31.2 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial
Officer
|
* | ||||||
32.1 | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive
Officer
|
* | ||||||
32.2 | Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial
Officer
|
* |
* | Filed herewith | |
| Consists of a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. | |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 30, 2010. | |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 29, 2010. | |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 30, 2010. | |
(4) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 30, 2010. | |
(5) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 2, 2010. | |
(6) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 2, 2010. | |
(7) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 2, 2010. | |
(8) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 7, 2010. | |
(9) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 7, 2010. | |
(10) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 7, 2010. | |
(11) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 7, 2010. | |
(12) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 7, 2010. |
32
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 8, 2010 | IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
|||
By: | /s/ César M. García | |||
César M. García | ||||
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
||||
By: | /s/ Martin S. McDermut | |||
Martin S. McDermut | ||||
Acting Chief Financial Officer | ||||
33