PART I

Item 1 - Business

General

As used herein, the term "Company" refers to Kimball International, Inc., the Registrant, and its subsidiaries. Reference to a year relates to a fiscal year, ended June 30 of the year indicated, rather than a calendar year unless the context indicates otherwise. Additionally, references to the first, second, third, and fourth quarters refer to those respective quarters of the fiscal year indicated.

The Company was incorporated in Indiana in 1939. The corporate headquarters is located at 1600 Royal Street, Jasper, Indiana.

The Company provides a variety of products from its two business segments: the Electronic Manufacturing Services (EMS) segment and the Furniture segment. The EMS segment provides engineering and manufacturing services which utilize common production and support capabilities globally to the medical, automotive, industrial control, and public safety industries. The Furniture segment provides furniture for the office and hospitality industries, sold under the Company's family of brand names. Production currently occurs in Company-owned or leased facilities located in the United States, Mexico, Thailand, China, Poland, and Wales, United Kingdom. In the United States, the Company has facilities and showrooms in ten states and the District of Columbia.

  Sales by Segment

Sales from continuing operations by segment, after elimination of intersegment sales, for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2010 were as follows:

(Amounts in Thousands)	2010				2009				2008
Electronic Manufacturing Services segment	$   709,133		63%		$   642,802		53%		$   727,149		54%
Furniture segment	413,611		37%		564,618		47%		624,836		46%
Unallocated Corporate and Eliminations	64		0%		-0-		0%		-0-		0%
Kimball International, Inc.	$1,122,808		100%		$1,207,420		100%		$1,351,985		100%

Financial information by segment and geographic area for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2010 is included in Note 15 - Segment and Geographic Area Information of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and is incorporated herein by reference.

Segments

   Electronic Manufacturing Services

  Overview

The Company began producing electronic assemblies, circuit boards, and wiring harnesses for electronic organs and keyboards in 1961 and has since grown and evolved with the EMS industry. The Company's current focus is on electronic assemblies that have high durability, quality, reliability, and regulatory compliance requirements including medical, automotive, industrial control, and public safety applications.

3

---

Electronics and electro-mechanical products (electronic assemblies) are sold globally on a contract basis and produced to customers' specifications. The Company's engineering and manufacturing services primarily entail:

production and testing of printed circuit board assemblies (PCBAs);

industrialization and automation of the manufacturing processes;

product and process validation and qualification;

testing of products under a series of harsh conditions;

assembly and packaging of electronic and other related products; and

complete product life cycle management.

Integrated throughout this segment is customer program management over the life cycle of the product along with supply chain management, which affords customers the opportunity to focus their attention and resources to sales, marketing, and product development as they sell their unique end products under their brand name into various markets and industries.

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company acquired privately-held Genesis Electronics Manufacturing (Genesis) of Tampa, Florida. The acquisition supports the Company's growth and diversification strategy, bringing new customers in the Company's key medical and industrial control markets.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company approved a plan to expand its European automotive electronics capabilities and to establish a European Medical Center of Expertise near Poznan, Poland. The Company previously had one operation in Poznan. Construction of a new, larger facility in Poland is complete and limited production has begun. The Company successfully completed the move of production from Longford, Ireland, into the existing Poznan facility during fiscal year 2009. During fiscal year 2010, the Company completed the sale of the existing Poland facility and land. The Company is leasing back the recently sold Poland facility until all production is moved to the new facility near Poznan, and the lease expires during the Company's fiscal year 2011. As part of the plan, the Company is also consolidating its EMS facilities located in Wales, United Kingdom, and Poznan, Poland, into the new facility near Poznan, which is expected to improve the Company's margins in the very competitive EMS market. The plan is being executed in stages with a projected completion date of mid-fiscal year 2012.

In an effort to improve profitability and increase Share Owner value while remaining committed to its business model of being market driven and customer centered, during the third quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company approved a restructuring plan designed to more appropriately align its workforce in a changing business environment. Within the Company's EMS segment, the restructuring activities included realigning engineering and technical resources closer to the customer and streamlining administrative and sales processes. The plan also included reducing corporate personnel costs to more properly align with the overall sales mix change within the Company. This plan was substantially complete during fiscal year 2008 with the remaining items completed during fiscal year 2009.

During the third quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company acquired Reptron Electronics, Inc. (Reptron), a U.S. based electronics manufacturing services company which provided engineering services, electronics manufacturing services, and display integration services. Reptron had four manufacturing operations located in Tampa, Florida; Hibbing, Minnesota; Gaylord, Michigan; and Fremont, California. The acquisition increased the Company's capabilities and expertise in support of the Company's long-term strategy to grow business in the medical electronics and high-end industrial sectors. With the acquisition, the Company recognized it would have excess capacity in North America. Management developed a plan as of the acquisition date to consolidate capacity within the acquired facilities. Based on a review of future growth potential in various geographies and input from existing customers regarding future capacity needs, during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company finalized a restructuring plan within the EMS segment to exit the manufacturing facility located in Gaylord, Michigan. Production ceased during the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, and the facility is currently held for sale. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company approved a restructuring plan to further consolidate its EMS facilities that resulted in the exit of the manufacturing facility located in Hibbing, Minnesota. Production at the Hibbing facility ceased in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, and the Company's lease of the Hibbing facility ended during the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. A majority of the Gaylord and Hibbing business transferred to several of the Company's other worldwide EMS facilities.

4

---

The Genesis acquisition is discussed in further detail in Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 2 - Acquisition of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Additional information regarding the Company's restructuring activities is located in Note 18 - Restructuring Expense of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Sales revenue of the EMS segment is generally not affected by seasonality with the exception of the buying patterns of automotive industry customers whose purchases of the Company's product are generally lower in the first quarter of the Company's fiscal year. Fiscal year 2010 net sales to automotive industry customers approximated one-third of the Company's EMS segment net sales.

  Locations

As of June 30, 2010, the Company's EMS segment consisted of nine manufacturing facilities with two located in Poland and one located in each of Indiana, Florida, California, China, Mexico, Thailand, and Wales, United Kingdom. Two of the Company's EMS facilities which are located in Wales and Poland will be consolidated into the new, larger facility in Poland with a projected completion by mid-fiscal year 2012. The Company continually assesses under-utilized capacity and evaluates its operations as to the most optimum capacity and service levels by geographic region. Operations located outside of the United States continue to be an integral part of the Company's EMS segment. See Item 1A - Risk Factors for information regarding financial and operational risks related to the Company's international operations.

  Marketing Channels

Manufacturing and engineering services are marketed by the Company's business development team. Contract electronic assemblies are manufactured based on specific orders, generally resulting in a small amount of finished goods consisting primarily of goods awaiting shipment to specific customers.

  Major Competitive Factors

Key competitive factors in the EMS market are competitive pricing, quality and reliability, engineering design services, production flexibility, on-time delivery, customer lead time, test capability, and global presence. Growth in the EMS industry is created through the proliferation of electronic components in today's advanced products along with the continuing trend of original equipment manufacturers in the electronics industry to subcontract the assembly process to companies with a core competence in this area. The nature of the EMS industry is such that the start-up of new customers and new programs to replace expiring programs occurs frequently. New customer and program start-ups generally cause losses early in the life of a program, which are generally recovered as the program becomes established and matures. The segment continues to experience margin pressures related to an overall excess capacity position in the EMS industry. The continuing success of this segment is dependent upon its ability to replace expiring customers/programs with new customers/programs.

The Company does not believe that it or the industry in general, has any special practices or special conditions affecting working capital items that are significant for understanding the EMS segment other than fluctuating inventory levels which may increase in conjunction with transfers of production among facilities.  

  Competitors

The EMS industry is very competitive as numerous manufacturers compete for business from existing and potential customers. The Company's competition includes EMS companies such as Benchmark Electronics, Inc., Jabil Circuit, Inc., and Plexus Corp. The Company does not have a significant share of the EMS market and was ranked the 17^th largest global EMS provider for calendar year 2009 by Manufacturing Market Insider in the March 2010 edition.

5

---

  Raw Material Availability

Raw materials utilized in the manufacture of contract electronic products are generally readily available from both domestic and foreign sources, although from time to time the industry experiences shortages of certain components due to supply and demand forces, combined with rapid product life cycles of certain components. As demand within the EMS industry increases, the availability of components used in certain products manufactured by the EMS segment is a concern. Many suppliers continue to be cautious regarding increasing their capacity and as a result, component shortages are occurring. During fiscal year 2010, the EMS segment experienced shortages of select components; however, the shortages did not have a material impact on the Company's operations or financial results. The impact could become material if the shortages continue or become more severe.

Raw materials are normally acquired for specific customer orders and may or may not be interchangeable among products. Inherent risks associated with rapid technological changes within this contract industry are mitigated by procuring raw materials, for the most part, based on firm orders. The Company may also purchase additional inventory to support transfers of production between manufacturing facilities.

  Customer Concentration

While the total electronic assemblies market has broad applications, the Company's customers are concentrated in the medical, automotive, industrial control, and public safety industries. Included in this segment are a significant amount of sales to Bayer AG affiliates which accounted for the following portions of consolidated net sales and EMS segment net sales:

	Year Ended June 30
	2010		2009		2008
Bayer AG affiliated sales as a percent of consolidated net sales	15%		12%		11%
Bayer AG affiliated sales as a percent of EMS segment net sales	24%		23%		21%

The Company's sales to Bayer AG are expected to begin to decline in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011 as the Company's manufacturing contract with Bayer AG reaches end-of-life. Margins on the Bayer AG product are generally lower than the Company's other EMS products. The nature of the contract business is such that start-up of new customers to replace expiring customers occurs frequently. The Company also continues to focus on diversification of the EMS segment customer base.

   Furniture

  Overview

Since 1950, the Company has produced wood furniture. During fiscal year 2007, the Company ceased manufacturing contract private label products as it increased focus on core markets. These core markets include office furniture sold under the Kimball Office and National Office Furniture brand names and hospitality furniture sold under the Kimball Hospitality brand name. Kimball Office and National Office Furniture provide office furniture solutions for private offices, open floor plan areas, conference rooms, training rooms, lobby, and lounge areas with a vast mix of wood, metal, laminate, paint, and fabric options. Products include desks, credenzas, seating, tables, collaborative workstations, contemporary cubicle systems, filing and storage units, and accessories such as audio visual boards and task lighting. Kimball Office products tend to focus on the more complex customer solutions, and National Office Furniture products are geared more to the mid-market/less complex/lower cost aspect of the office furniture market. Kimball Hospitality provides furniture solutions for hotel properties, condominiums, and mixed use developments. Products include headboards, desks, tables, dressers, entertainment centers, chests, wall panels, upholstered seating, task seating, and vanities. Also included in this segment are the Company's trucking fleet and customer fulfillment centers, which handle primarily product of this segment; but certain logistics services, such as backhauls, are sold on a contract basis.

Sales revenue of the Furniture segment is generally not affected by seasonality with the exception of certain product lines which are impacted by the buying patterns of customers such as the U.S. Federal Government whose purchases of the Company's product are generally higher in the first half of the Company's fiscal year.

6

---

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company approved a restructuring plan to consolidate production of select office furniture manufacturing departments. The consolidation was substantially completed during fiscal year 2009 with the remaining items completed during fiscal year 2010. The consolidation has reduced manufacturing costs and excess capacity by eliminating redundant property and equipment, processes, and employee costs.

As discussed under "Segments - Electronic Manufacturing Services" above, the Furniture segment part of the workforce reduction restructuring activities announced in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 included realigning information technology and procurement resources closer to the customer and streamlining administrative and sales processes to drive further synergies afforded by the alignment of the sales and manufacturing functions within this segment. Related expenditures were primarily for employee severance and transition costs. This plan was substantially completed during fiscal year 2008 with the remaining items completed during fiscal year 2009.

In conjunction with the cessation of manufacturing contract private label products, during fiscal year 2007 the Company approved a plan to exit the production of wood rear projection television cabinets (PTV) and stands within the Furniture segment, which resulted in the exit of the Company's Juarez, Mexico, operation. The discontinued operation is discussed in further detail in Note 19 - Discontinued Operation of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

As part of the Company's plan to sharpen focus and simplify business processes within the Furniture segment, the Company announced during the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, a plan which included consolidation of administrative, marketing, and business development functions to better serve the segment's primary markets. Expenses related to this plan included software impairment, accelerated amortization, employee severance, and other consolidation costs. This plan was completed during fiscal year 2008.

Additional information regarding the Company's restructuring activities is located in Note 18 - Restructuring Expense of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

  Locations

The Company's furniture products as of June 30, 2010 were primarily produced at ten plants: seven located in Indiana, two in Kentucky, and one in Idaho. In addition, select finished goods are purchased from external sources. The Company continually assesses manufacturing capacity and has adjusted such capacity in recent years.

In addition, a facility in Indiana houses an education center for dealer and employee training, a research and development center, and a product showroom. Office furniture showrooms are maintained in nine additional cities in the United States. Office space is leased in Dongguan, Guangdong, China, to facilitate sourcing of select finished goods and components from the Asia Pacific Region.

  Marketing Channels

Kimball Office and National brands of office furniture are marketed through Company salespersons to end users, office furniture dealers, wholesalers, rental companies, and catalog houses throughout North America and on an international basis. Hospitality furniture is marketed to end users using independent manufacturers' representatives.

  Major Competitive Factors

The Company's furniture is sold in the office furniture and hospitality furniture industries. These industries have similar major competitive factors which include price in relation to quality and appearance, the utility of the product, supplier lead time, reliability of on-time delivery, and the ability to respond to requests for special and non-standard products. The Company offers payment terms similar to industry standards and in unique circumstances may allow alternate payment terms.

7

---

Certain industries are more price sensitive than others, but all expect on-time, damage-free delivery. The Company maintains sufficient finished goods inventories to be able to offer prompt shipment of certain lines of office furniture as well as most of the Company's own lines of hospitality furniture. The Company also produces hospitality furniture to customers' specifications and shipping timelines. Many office furniture products are shipped through the Company's delivery system, which the Company believes offers it the ability to reduce damage to product, enhance scheduling flexibility, and improve the capability for on-time deliveries.

The Company does not believe that it or the industry in general, has any special practices or special conditions affecting working capital items that are significant for understanding the Company's business. The Company does receive advance payments from customers on select furniture projects primarily in the hospitality industry. 

  Competitors

There are numerous manufacturers of office and hospitality furniture competing within the marketplace, with a significant number of competitors offering similar products. The Company believes, however, that there are a limited number of relatively large manufacturers of wood office furniture. In many instances wood office furniture competes in the market with nonwood office furniture. Based on available industry statistics, nonwood office furniture has a larger share of the total office furniture market.

The Company's competition includes furniture manufacturers such as Steelcase, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc., Knoll, Inc., Haworth, Inc., and HNI Corporation and several other privately-owned furniture manufacturers.

  Raw Material Availability

Certain components used in the production of furniture are manufactured internally within the segment and are generally readily available, as are other raw materials used in the production of wood and nonwood furniture. Certain fabricated seating components and wood frame assemblies as well as finished furniture products, which are generally readily available, are sourced on a global scale in an effort to provide a quality product at the lowest total cost.

Other Information

  Backlog
At June 30, 2010, the aggregate sales price of production pursuant to worldwide open orders, which may be canceled by the customer, was $269.7 million as compared to $227.1 million at June 30, 2009.

(Amounts in Millions)	June 30, 2010		June 30, 2009
Furniture	$   70.6		$   70.2
EMS	199.1		156.9
Total Backlog	$ 269.7		$ 227.1

Substantially all of the open orders as of June 30, 2010 are expected to be filled within the next fiscal year. Open orders generally may not be indicative of future sales trends.

8

---

  Research, Patents, and Trademarks

Research and development activities include the development of manufacturing processes, major process improvements, new product development and product redesign, information technology initiatives, and electronic and wood related technologies.

Research and development costs were approximately:

	Year Ended June 30
(Amounts in Millions)	2010		2009		2008
Research and Development Costs	$12		$14		$16

The Company owns the Kimball (registered trademark) trademark, which it believes is significant to the EMS and Furniture segments, and owns the following patent and trademarks which it believes are significant to the Furniture segment only:

Registered Trademarks:  National. Furniture with Personality, Cetra, Footprint, Traxx, Interworks, Xsite, Definition, Skye, WaveWorks, Senator, Prevail, Eloquence, Hum. Minds at Work, and Pura

Trademarks:  President and IntegraClear

Patent:  Traxx

The Company also owns other patents and trademarks and has certain other trademark and patent applications pending, which in the Company's opinion are not significant to its business. Patents owned by the Company expire at various times depending on the patent's date of issuance.

  Environment and Energy Matters

The Company's operations are subject to various foreign, federal, state, and local laws and regulations with respect to environmental matters. The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with present laws and regulations and that there are no material liabilities related to such items.

The Company is dedicated to excellence, leadership, and stewardship in matters of protecting the environment and communities in which the Company has operations. Reinforcing the Company's commitment to the environment, six of the Company's showrooms and two non-manufacturing locations have been designed under the guidelines of the U.S. Green Building Council's LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) for Commercial Interiors program. The Company believes that continued compliance with foreign, federal, state, and local laws and regulations which have been enacted relating to the protection of the environment will not have a material effect on its capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position. Management believes capital expenditures for environmental control equipment during the two fiscal years ending June 30, 2012, will not represent a material portion of total capital expenditures during those years.

The Company's manufacturing operations require significant amounts of energy, including natural gas and oil. Federal and state statutes and regulations control the allocation of fuels available to the Company, but to date the Company has experienced no interruption of production due to such regulations. In its wood processing plants, a portion of energy requirements are satisfied internally by the use of the Company's own wood waste products.

9

---

  Employees

	June 30, 2010		June 30, 2009
United States	3,831		4,097
Foreign Countries	2,356		2,067
Total Full-Time Employees	6,187		6,164

All of the Company's foreign operations are subject to collective bargaining arrangements, many mandated by government regulation or customs of the particular countries. The Company believes that its employee relations are good.

  Available Information

The Company makes available free of charge through its website, http://www.ir.kimball.com, its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All reports the Company files with the SEC are also available via the SEC website, http://www.sec.gov, or may be read and copied at the SEC Public Reference Room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Company's Internet website and the information contained therein or incorporated therein are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Forward-Looking Statements

This document may contain certain forward-looking statements. These are statements made by management, using their best business judgment based upon facts known at the time of the statements or reasonable estimates, about future results, plans, or future performance and business of the Company. Such statements involve risk and uncertainty, and their ultimate validity is affected by a number of factors, both specific and general. They should not be construed as a guarantee that such results or events will, in fact, occur or be realized. The statements may be identified by the use of words such as "believes," "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "projects," "estimates," "forecasts," and similar expressions. It is not possible to foresee or identify all factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historical results. Additional information regarding risk factors is available in Item 1A - Risk Factors of this report. The Company makes no commitment to update these factors or to revise any forward-looking statements for events or circumstances occurring after the statement is issued, except as required in current and quarterly periodic reports filed with the SEC or otherwise by law.

At any time when the Company makes forward-looking statements, it desires to take advantage of the "safe harbor" which is afforded such statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 where factors could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

The following important risk factors, among others, could affect future results and events, causing results and events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements made in this report and presented elsewhere by management from time to time. Such factors, among others, may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations and should be carefully considered. It is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, any such list should not be considered to be a complete statement of all the Company's potential risks or uncertainties. Because of these and other factors, past performance should not be considered an indication of future performance.

Unfavorable macroeconomic and industry conditions could continue to adversely impact demand for the Company's products and adversely affect operating results. Market demand for the Company's products, which impacts revenues and gross profit, is influenced by a variety of economic and industry factors such as:

general corporate profitability of the Company's end markets;

credit availability to the Company's end markets;

profitability of financial institutions to whom the Company sells office furniture which continue to be impacted by the changing regulatory environment and the credit market issues;

white-collar unemployment rates;

commercial property vacancy rates;

new office construction and refurbishment rates;

new hotel and casino construction and refurbishment rates;

automotive industry fluctuations;

changes in the medical device industry;

demand for end-user products which include electronic assembly components produced by the Company;

excess capacity in the industries in which the Company competes; and

changes in customer order patterns, including changes in product quantities, delays in orders, or cancellation of orders.

The Company must make decisions based on order volumes in order to achieve efficiency in manufacturing capacities. These decisions include determining what level of additional business to accept, production schedules, component procurement commitments, and personnel requirements, among various other considerations. The Company must constantly monitor the changing economic landscape and may modify its strategic direction based upon the changing business environment. If the Company does not react quickly enough to the changes in market or economic conditions, it could result in lost customers, decreased market share, and increased operating costs.

Market conditions have had and may continue to have an adverse impact on the Company's operating results. The Company's key strategies remain intact, but it must continue to adjust operations as needed to appropriately stay focused on its priorities and to align with the changing market conditions. The Company cannot predict the timing or the duration of any downturn in the economy or the related effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.

The Company is exposed to the credit risk of its customers. The current economic conditions and the state of the credit markets drive an elevated risk of potential bankruptcy of customers resulting in a greater risk of uncollectible outstanding accounts receivable. Accordingly, the Company intensely monitors its receivables and related credit risks. The realization of these risks could have a negative impact on the Company's profitability.

Reduction of purchases by or the loss of one or more key customers could reduce revenues and profitability. Losses of key contract customers within specific industries or significant volume reductions from key contract customers are both risks. If a current customer of the Company merges with or is acquired by a party that currently is aligned with a competitor, the Company could lose future revenues. In addition, sales to Bayer AG affiliates accounted for 15%, 12%, and 11% of consolidated net sales in fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. The Company's sales to Bayer AG are expected to begin to decline in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011 as the Company's manufacturing contract with Bayer AG reaches end-of-life. Margins on the Bayer AG product are generally lower than the Company's other EMS products. The continuing success of the Company is dependent upon replacing expiring contract customers/programs with new customers/programs. The nature of the contract electronics manufacturing industry is such that the start-up of new customers and new programs to replace expiring programs occurs frequently, and new customer and program start-ups generally cause losses early in the life of a program. The Company can provide no assurance that it will be able to fully replace any lost sales, which could have an adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. A reduction of government spending on furniture could also have an adverse impact on the Company's sales levels.

11

---

The Company operates in a highly competitive environment and may not be able to compete successfully. The Company faces pricing pressures in both of its segments, especially the EMS segment, as a result of intense competition from large EMS providers, emerging products, and over-capacity. Numerous manufacturers within the EMS industry compete globally for business from existing and potential customers. The office and hospitality furniture industries are also competitive due to numerous global manufacturers competing in the marketplace. In times of reduced demand for office furniture, large competitors may apply more pressure to their aligned distribution to sell their products exclusively which could lead to reduced opportunities for the Company's products. While the Company works toward reducing costs to respond to pricing pressures, if the Company cannot achieve the proportionate reductions in costs, profit margins may suffer. In addition, as end markets dictate, the Company is continually assessing excess capacity and developing plans to better utilize manufacturing operations, including consolidating and shifting manufacturing capacity to lower cost venues as necessary. The high level of competition in these industries impacts the Company's ability to implement price increases or, in some cases, even maintain prices, which could lower profit margins.

The Company's future operating results depend on the ability to purchase a sufficient amount of materials, parts, and components at competitive prices. The Company depends on suppliers globally to provide timely delivery of materials, parts, and components for use in the Company's products. The financial stability of suppliers is monitored by the Company when feasible as the loss of a significant supplier could have an adverse impact on the Company's operations. Supplier capacity reductions within the EMS industry during the recession have lengthened lead times and have driven component shortages and/or component allocations and could continue to do so as the supply chain slowly ramps up. Maintaining strong relationships with key suppliers of components critical to the manufacturing process is essential. Price increases of commodity components could have an adverse impact on profitability if the Company cannot offset such increases with other cost reductions or by price increases to customers. Materials utilized by the Company are generally available, but future availability is unknown and could impact the Company's ability to meet customer order requirements. The Company also purchases select finished goods. If suppliers fail to meet commitments to the Company in terms of price, delivery, or quality, it could interrupt the Company's operations and negatively impact the Company's ability to meet commitments to customers.

The Company's operating results are impacted by the cost of fuel and other energy sources. The cost of energy is a critical component of freight expense and the cost of operating manufacturing facilities. Increases in the cost of energy could reduce profitability of the Company.

The Company could be impacted by manufacturing inefficiencies at certain locations. At times the Company may experience labor or other manufacturing inefficiencies due to factors such as new product introductions, transfers of production among the Company's manufacturing facilities, a sudden decline in sales, a new operating system, or turnover in personnel. Manufacturing inefficiencies could have an adverse impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

A change in the Company's sales mix among various products could have a negative impact on the gross profit margin. Changes in product sales mix could negatively impact the gross margin of the Company as margins of different products vary. The Company strives to improve the margins of all products, but certain products have lower margins in order to price the product competitively or in connection with the start-up of a new program. In addition, the EMS segment has historically operated at a lower gross profit percentage than the Furniture segment, and if the sales mix continues to trend toward the EMS segment, the Company's consolidated gross profit margin will be negatively impacted. An increase in the proportion of sales of products with lower margins could have an adverse impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

12

---

The Company's restructuring efforts may not be successful. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company approved a plan to expand its European automotive electronics capabilities and to establish a European Medical Center of Expertise near Poznan, Poland. The Company previously had one operation in Poznan. Construction of a new, larger facility in Poland is complete and limited production has begun. The Company successfully completed the move of production from Longford, Ireland, into the existing Poznan facility during fiscal year 2009. As part of the plan, the Company is also consolidating its EMS facilities located in Wales, United Kingdom, and Poznan, Poland, into the new facility near Poznan, with a projected final completion of the consolidation by mid-fiscal year 2012. The Company continually evaluates its manufacturing capabilities and capacities in relation to current and anticipated market conditions. The successful execution of restructuring initiatives is dependent on several factors and may not be accomplished as quickly or effectively as anticipated.

Acquisitions by their nature may present risks to the Company. The Company's sales growth plans may occur through both organic growth and acquisitions. Acquisitions involve many risks, including:

difficulties in identifying suitable acquisition candidates and in negotiating and consummating acquisitions on terms attractive to the Company;

difficulties in the assimilation of the operations of the acquired company;

the diversion of resources, including diverting management's attention from current operations;

risks of entering new geographic or product markets in which the Company has limited or no direct prior experience;

the potential loss of key customers of the acquired company;

the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company;

the potential incurrence of indebtedness to fund the acquisition;

the potential issuance of common stock for some or all of the purchase price, which could dilute ownership interests of the Company's current shareholders;

the acquired business not achieving anticipated revenues, earnings, cash flow, or market share;

excess capacity;

the assumption of undisclosed liabilities; and

dilution of earnings.

Start-up operations could present risks to the Company's current operations. The Company is committed to growing its business, and therefore from time to time, the Company may determine that it would be in its best interests to start up a new operation. Start-up operations involve a number of risks and uncertainties, such as funding the capital expenditures related to the start-up operation, developing a management team for the new operation, diversion of management focus away from current operations, and creation of excess capacity. Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. 

The Company's international operations involve financial and operational risks. The Company has operations outside the United States, primarily in China, Thailand, Poland, the United Kingdom, and Mexico. The Company's international operations are subject to a number of risks, which may include the following:

economic and political instability;

changes in foreign regulatory requirements and laws;

tariffs and other trade barriers;

potentially adverse tax consequences; and

foreign labor practices.

These risks could have an adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In addition, fluctuations in exchange rates could impact the Company's operating results. The Company's risk management strategy includes the use of derivative financial instruments to hedge certain foreign currency exposures. Any hedging techniques the Company implements contain risks and may not be entirely effective. Exchange rate fluctuations could also make the Company's products more expensive than competitor's products not subject to these fluctuations, which could adversely affect the Company's revenues and profitability in international markets.

13

---

If the Company's efforts to introduce new products are not successful, this could limit sales growth or cause sales to decline. The EMS segment depends on industries that utilize technologically advanced electronic components which often have short life cycles. The Company must continue to invest in advanced equipment and product development to remain competitive in this area. The Furniture segment regularly introduces new products to keep pace with workplace trends and evolving regulatory and industry requirements, including environmental, health, safety standards such as ergonomic considerations, and similar standards for the workplace and for product performance. The introduction of new products requires the coordination of the design, manufacturing, and marketing of such products. The design and engineering of certain new products can take nine to eighteen months or more, and further time may be required to achieve customer acceptance. Accordingly, the launch of any particular product may be delayed or be less successful than originally anticipated by the Company. Difficulties or delays in introducing new products or lack of customer acceptance of new products could limit sales growth or cause sales to decline.

If customers do not perceive the Company's products to be innovative and of high quality, the Company's brand and name recognition could suffer. The Company believes that establishing and maintaining brand and name recognition is critical to business. Promotion and enhancement of the Company's brands will depend on the effectiveness of marketing and advertising efforts and on successfully providing innovative and high quality products and superior services. If customers do not perceive its products and services to be innovative and of high quality, the Company's brand and name recognition could suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business.

A loss of independent manufacturing representatives, dealers, or other sales channels could lead to a decline in sales of the Company's Furniture segment products. The Company's office furniture is marketed primarily through Company salespersons to end users, office furniture dealers, wholesalers, rental companies, and catalog houses. The Company's hospitality furniture is marketed to end users using independent manufacturing representatives. A significant loss within any of these sales channels could result in a sales decline and thus have an adverse impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company must effectively manage working capital. The Company closely monitors inventory and receivable efficiencies and continuously strives to improve these measures of working capital, but customer financial difficulties, cancellation or delay of customer orders, transfers of production among the Company's manufacturing facilities, or Company manufacturing delays could cause deteriorating working capital trends.

The Company's assets could become impaired. As business conditions change, the Company must continually evaluate and work toward the optimum asset base. It is possible that certain assets such as, but not limited to, facilities, equipment, intangible assets, or goodwill could be impaired at some point in the future depending on changing business conditions. If assets of the Company become impaired the result could be an adverse impact on the Company's financial position and results of operations.

There are inherent uncertainties involved in estimates, judgments, and assumptions used in the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (U.S. GAAP). Any changes in estimates, judgments, and assumptions could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company's financial statements filed with the SEC are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and the preparation of such financial statements includes making estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and related reserves, revenues, expenses, and income. Estimates are inherently subject to change in the future, and such changes could result in corresponding changes to the amounts of assets, liabilities, income, or expenses and likewise could have an adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Changes in financial accounting standards may affect the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is considering various proposed rule changes. The SEC is considering adopting rules that would require U.S. issuers to prepare their financial statements contained in SEC filings in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The implementation of new accounting standards or changes to U.S. GAAP could adversely impact the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

14

---

Fluctuations in the Company's effective tax rate could have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The mix of pre-tax income or loss among the tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates that have varying tax rates could impact the Company's effective tax rate. The Company is subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes, in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. Judgment is required in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes, other tax liabilities, interest, and penalties. Future events could change management's assessment. The Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to tax audits in these jurisdictions. These audits can involve complex issues, which may require an extended period of time to resolve. The Company has also made assumptions about the realization of deferred tax assets. Changes in these assumptions could result in a valuation allowance for these assets. Final determination of tax audits or tax disputes may be different from what is currently reflected by the Company's income tax provisions and accruals. In addition, President Obama's administration has announced proposals for new U.S. tax legislation that, if adopted, could adversely affect the Company's tax rate.

A failure to comply with the financial covenants under the Company's $100 million credit facility could adversely impact the Company. The Company's credit facility requires the Company to comply with certain financial covenants. The Company believes the most significant covenants under its credit facility are minimum net worth and interest coverage ratio. More detail on these financial covenants is discussed in Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had no short-term borrowings under its credit facilities and had total cash of $67.8 million, defined as cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. In the future, a default on the financial covenants under the Company's credit facility could cause an increase in the borrowing rates or could make it more difficult for the Company to secure future financing which could have an adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.

A failure to successfully implement information technology solutions could adversely affect the Company. The Company's business depends on effective information technology systems. Information systems require an ongoing commitment of significant resources to maintain and enhance existing systems and develop new systems in order to keep pace with changes in information processing technology and evolving industry standards. Implementation delays or poor execution of information technology systems could disrupt the Company's operations and increase costs.

An inability to protect the Company's intellectual property could have a significant impact on business. The Company attempts to protect its intellectual property rights, both in the United States and in foreign countries, through a combination of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret laws, as well as licensing agreements and third-party non-disclosure and assignment agreements. Because of the differences in foreign laws concerning proprietary rights, the Company's intellectual property rights do not generally receive the same degree of protection in foreign countries as they do in the United States, and therefore in some parts of the world, the Company has limited protections, if any, for its intellectual property. Competing effectively depends, to a significant extent, on maintaining the proprietary nature of the Company's intellectual property. The degree of protection offered by the claims of the various patents and trademarks may not be broad enough to provide significant proprietary protection or competitive advantages to the Company, and patents or trademarks may not be issued on pending or contemplated applications. In addition, not all of the Company's products are covered by patents. It is also possible that the Company's patents and trademarks may be challenged, invalidated, cancelled, narrowed, or circumvented.

A third party could claim that the Company has infringed on their intellectual property rights. The Company could be notified of a claim regarding intellectual property rights which could lead to the Company spending time and money to defend or address the claim. Even if the claim is without merit, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources.

The Company's insurance may not adequately protect the Company from liabilities related to product defects. The Company maintains product liability and other insurance coverage that the Company believes to be generally in accordance with industry practices. However, its insurance coverage may not be adequate to protect the Company fully against substantial claims and costs that may arise from liabilities related to product defects, particularly if the Company has a large number of defective products or if the root cause is disputed.

The Company's failure to maintain Food and Drug Administration (FDA) registration of one or more of its registered manufacturing facilities could negatively impact the Company's ability to produce products for its customers in the medical industry. To maintain FDA registration, the Company is subject to FDA audits of the manufacturing process. FDA audit failure could result in a partial or total suspension of production, fines, or criminal prosecution. Failure or noncompliance could have an adverse effect on the Company's reputation in addition to an adverse impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

15

---

The Company is subject to extensive environmental regulation and significant potential environmental liabilities. The past and present operation and ownership by the Company of manufacturing plants and real property are subject to extensive and changing federal, state, local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to discharges in air, water, and land, the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous waste, and the remediation of contamination associated with releases of hazardous substances. In addition, the increased prevalence of global warming issues may result in new regulations that may negatively impact the Company. The Company cannot predict what environmental legislation or regulations will be enacted in the future, how existing or future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted or what environmental conditions may be found to exist. Compliance with more stringent laws or regulations, or stricter interpretation of existing laws, may require additional expenditures by the Company, some of which could be material. In addition, any investigations or remedial efforts relating to environmental matters could involve material costs or otherwise result in material liabilities.

The Company's failure to retain the existing management team; maintain its engineering, technical, and manufacturing process expertise; and continue to attract qualified personnel could adversely affect the Company's business. The success of the Company is dependent on keeping pace with technological advancements and adapting services to provide manufacturing capabilities which meet customers' changing needs. In addition, the Company must retain its qualified engineering and technical personnel and successfully anticipate and respond to technological changes in a cost effective and timely manner. The Company's culture and guiding principles focus on continuous training, motivating, and development of employees, and it strives to attract, motivate, and retain qualified personnel. Failure to retain and attract qualified personnel could adversely affect the Company's business.

Turnover in personnel could cause manufacturing inefficiencies. The demand for manufacturing labor in certain geographic areas makes it difficult to retain experienced production employees. Turnover could result in additional training and inefficiencies that could impact the Company's operating results.

Natural disasters or other catastrophic events may impact the Company's production schedules and, in turn, negatively impact profitability. Natural disasters or other catastrophic events, including severe weather, terrorist attacks, power interruptions, and fires, could disrupt operations and likewise the ability to produce or deliver the Company's products. The Company's manufacturing operations require significant amounts of energy, including natural gas and oil, and governmental regulations may control the allocation of such fuels to the Company. Employees are an integral part of the Company's business and events such as a pandemic could reduce the availability of employees reporting for work. In the event the Company experiences a temporary or permanent interruption in its ability to produce or deliver product, revenues could be reduced, and business could be materially adversely affected. In addition, catastrophic events, or the threat thereof, can adversely affect U.S. and world economies, and could result in delayed or lost sales of the Company's products. In addition, any continuing disruption in the Company's computer system could adversely affect the ability to receive and process customer orders, manufacture products, and ship products on a timely basis, and could adversely affect relations with customers, potentially resulting in reduction in orders from customers or loss of customers. The Company maintains insurance to help protect the Company from costs relating to some of these matters, but such may not be sufficient or paid in a timely manner to the Company in the event of such an interruption.

The requirements of being a public company may strain the Company's resources and distract management. The Company is subject to the reporting requirements of federal securities laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Among other requirements, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that the Company maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. The Company has, and expects to continue to, expend significant management time and resources maintaining documentation and testing internal control over financial reporting. While management's evaluation as of June 30, 2010 resulted in the conclusion that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of that date, the Company cannot predict the outcome of testing in future periods. If the Company concludes in future periods that its internal control over financial reporting is not effective, or if its independent registered public accounting firm is not able to render the required attestations, it could result in lost investor confidence in the accuracy, reliability, and completeness of the Company's financial reports.

16

---

Imposition of government regulations may significantly increase the Company's operating costs in the United States. The federal government has a broad agenda of potential legislative and regulatory reforms, which if enacted, could significantly impact the profitability of the Company by burdening it with forced cost choices that cannot be recovered by increased pricing. In addition, the Company imports a portion of its wood furniture products and is thus subject to an antidumping tariff on wooden bedroom furniture supplied from China. Although the impact to the Company of the tariff rates since the imposition of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review has not been material, the tariffs are subject to review and could result in retroactive and prospective tariff rate increases which could have an adverse impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. 

Healthcare reform legislation in the United States could adversely impact the Company's operating costs. Healthcare reform legislation enacted and being considered by Congress and state legislatures may have an impact on the Company's business. Under the healthcare reform legislation, the federal government is expected to:

assume a greater role in the healthcare system;

expand healthcare coverage in the United States;

mandate basic healthcare benefits; and

impose regulations on both businesses that provide or do not provide healthcare insurance to their employees.

The Company's current assessment is that this legislation will most likely increase its total healthcare costs which could have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations, manufacturing facilities and employment in the U.S., or cash flows.

The value of the Company's common stock may experience substantial fluctuations for reasons over which the Company has little control. The value of common stock could fluctuate substantially based on a variety of factors, including, among others:

actual or anticipated fluctuations in operating results;

announcements concerning the Company, competitors, or industry;

overall volatility of the stock market;

changes in the financial estimates of securities analysts or investors regarding the Company, the industry, or competitors; and

general market or economic conditions.

Furthermore, stock prices for many companies fluctuate widely for reasons that may be unrelated to their operating results. These fluctuations, coupled with changes in results of operations and general economic, political, and market conditions, may adversely affect the value of the Company's common stock.

Business Overview

Kimball International, Inc. provides a variety of products from its two business segments: the Electronic Manufacturing Services (EMS) segment and the Furniture segment. The EMS segment provides engineering and manufacturing services which utilize common production and support capabilities globally to the medical, automotive, industrial control, and public safety industries. The Furniture segment provides furniture for the office and hospitality industries, sold under the Company's family of brand names.

Within both segments, most of the markets in which the Company competes were adversely affected by the global recession and liquidity crisis. The recession first began to impact the Company's sales and order trends in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. The EMS segment has rebounded quicker than the Furniture segment with June 30, 2010 open orders 27% higher than June 30, 2009 and similar to the open order levels in the EMS segment prior to the declines the Company experienced related to the global recession. Furniture segment open orders as of June 30, 2010 approximated the June 30, 2009 level. While open orders in the Furniture segment are down significantly from the levels experienced prior to the impact of the global recession, the June 30, 2010 open orders increased 24% from the level for the most recent quarter ended March 31, 2010.

After experiencing 11% sales declines in calendar year 2009, the EMS industry sales projections (by IDC, InForum, and Electronic Trend Publications) show average forecasted growth for calendar year 2010 in the range of 7% to 8% compared to calendar year 2009. In addition, the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) reported that semiconductor sales are projected to grow approximately 28% in calendar year 2010, and although the Company does not directly serve this market, it may be indicative of increased end market demand for products utilizing electronic components.

The Company continues its strategy of diversification within the EMS segment customer base as it currently focuses on the four key vertical markets of medical, automotive, industrial control, and public safety. Short-term demand in the automotive market improved during the first half of the Company's fiscal year 2010 in conjunction with the federal Cash for Clunkers tax rebate program. Automotive activity in the latter half of fiscal year 2010 remained strong with activity projected to moderate in fiscal year 2011 due to the impact of current economic conditions on durable goods spending. Demand in the medical market has remained stable, and the Company sees signs of growth. The industrial control market is also showing signs of stability, after benefiting from spending targeted at energy savings technologies, and the public safety market is likewise stable. Sales to customers in the medical industry are the largest portion of the Company's EMS segment with sales to customers in the automotive industry being the second largest of the four vertical markets. The Company's sales to customers in the automotive industry are diversified among more than ten domestic and foreign customers and represented approximately 30% of the EMS segment's net sales for fiscal year 2010. The amount of sales of electronic components that relate to General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler automobiles sold in North America were only approximately 8% of the Company's EMS segment net sales during fiscal year 2010.

24

---

As of August 2010, the Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturer Association (BIFMA) projected a 1.5% year-over-year increase in the office furniture industry for calendar year 2010 after a 29% industry decline in calendar year 2009. BIFMA projects office furniture industry growth of approximately 9% in calendar year 2011. While the Company's mid-market brand has fared better than its contract office furniture brand due to the project nature of the contract market and the changing U.S. consumption patterns, the Company cannot predict future overall office furniture order trends at this time due to the short lead time of orders and the volatility in this market. In addition, the hotel industry forecasts (reported by Smith Travel Research and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP) project occupancy rates to increase approximately 3% in calendar year 2010 after a 9% industry decline in calendar year 2009 and project revenue per available room to increase less than 2% for calendar year 2010 after a 17% industry decline in calendar year 2009. Although the Company's recent hospitality order rates have improved, the Company cannot predict if this activity will be sustained in the near-term.

Competitive pricing pressures within the EMS segment and on many projects within the Furniture segment continue to put pressure on the Company's operating margins.

The Company is continually assessing its strategies in relation to market conditions. A long-standing component of the Company's profit sharing incentive bonus plan is that it is linked to the performance of the Company which automatically lowers total compensation expense when profits are down. During fiscal year 2010, the Company also maintained its focus on reducing operating costs, more closely scrutinizing customer and supply chain risk, and deferring or cancelling capital expenditures that were not immediately required to support customer requirements. The Company will continue to closely monitor market changes and its liquidity in order to proactively adjust its operating costs, discretionary capital spending, and dividend levels as needed.

The Company continued to maintain a strong balance sheet as of the end of fiscal year 2010, which included a minimal amount of long-term debt of $0.4 million and Share Owners' equity of $377.4 million. The Company's short-term liquidity available, represented as cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments plus the unused amount of the Company's revolving credit facility, was $163.6 million at June 30, 2010.

In addition to the above risks related to the current market conditions, management currently considers the following events, trends, and uncertainties to be most important to understanding the Company's financial condition and operating performance:

The Company will continue its focus on preserving cash and minimizing debt. Managing working capital in conjunction with fluctuating demand levels is key. In addition, the Company plans to minimize capital expenditures where appropriate but has been and will continue to invest in capital expenditures for projects that would enhance the Company's capabilities and diversification while providing an opportunity for growth and improved profitability as the economy and the Company's markets recover.

Commodity price pressure is expected to continue in the near-term. Mitigating the impact of higher commodity and fuel prices continues to be an area of focus within the Company.

Management continues to evaluate the healthcare reform legislation that was signed into law in March 2010 to understand the full impact on the Company. This legislation is expected to increase the Company's healthcare and related administrative expenses.

Globalization continues to reshape not only the industries in which the Company operates but also its key customers and competitors.

As demand within the EMS industry increases, the availability of components used in products manufactured by the Company is a concern. As suppliers have not increased their production as rapidly as demand has increased, component shortages are occurring. If shortages of components continue or worsen, the Company's production and shipment schedules could be impacted.

25

---

 

The nature of the EMS industry is such that the start-up of new programs to replace departing customers or expiring programs occurs frequently. The Company's sales to Bayer AG are expected to begin to decline in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011 as the Company's manufacturing contract with Bayer AG reaches end-of-life. Margins on the Bayer AG product are generally lower than the Company's other EMS products. The success of the Company's EMS segment is dependent on the successful replacement of such customers or programs. Such changes usually occur gradually over time as old programs phase out of production while newer programs ramp up. While the margins vary depending on the size of the program and the vertical market being served, replacement programs generally require more competitive pricing. Thus the Company must strive to identify cost savings opportunities to offset the lower pricing. See Item 1A - Risk Factors for more information on the risks related to contract customers.

Successful execution of the Company's restructuring plans is critical to the Company's future performance. The success of the restructuring initiatives is dependent on accomplishing the plans in a timely and effective manner. The Company's restructuring plans are discussed in the segment discussions below.

The increasingly competitive marketplace mandates that the Company continually re-evaluate its business models.

The Company's employees throughout its business operations are an integral part of the Company's ability to compete successfully, and the stability of its management team is critical to long-term Share Owner value. The Company's career development and succession planning process helps to maintain stability in management.

As end markets dictate, the Company is continually assessing under-utilized capacity and developing plans to grow its customer base and better utilize manufacturing operations, including shifting manufacturing capacity to lower cost venues as appropriate. o    During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company approved a restructuring plan to consolidate production of select office furniture manufacturing departments. The consolidation is complete and has reduced manufacturing costs and excess capacity by eliminating redundant property and equipment, processes, and employee costs. o    During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company approved a plan to expand its European automotive electronics capabilities and to establish a European Medical Center of Expertise near Poznan, Poland which is expected to improve the Company's margins in the very competitive EMS market. The Company previously had one operation in Poznan. Construction of a new, larger facility in Poland is complete and limited production has begun. The Company successfully completed the move of production from Longford, Ireland, into the existing Poznan facility during the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. As part of the plan, the Company is also consolidating its EMS facilities located in Wales, United Kingdom, and Poznan, Poland into the new facility near Poznan, with a projected final completion of the consolidation by mid-fiscal year 2012.

To support growth and diversification efforts, the Company has focused on both organic growth and potential acquisition targets. Acquisitions allow rapid diversification of both customers and industries served.

The regulatory and business environment for U.S. public companies requires that the Company continually evaluate and enhance its practices in the areas of corporate governance and management practices. The Company has taken a number of steps to conform its corporate governance to evolving national and industry-wide best practices among U.S. public companies, not only to comply with new legal requirements, but also to enhance the decision-making process and effectiveness of the Company's Board of Directors.

Certain preceding statements could be considered forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, a significant change in economic conditions, loss of key customers or suppliers, or similar unforeseen events.

26

---

Fiscal Year 2010 Results of Operations

Financial Overview - Consolidated

Fiscal year 2010 consolidated net sales were $1.12 billion compared to fiscal year 2009 net sales of $1.21 billion, a 7% decrease, due to a 27% net sales decrease in the Furniture segment, which more than offset a 10% net sales increase in the EMS segment. Fiscal year 2010 net income was $10.8 million, or $0.29 per Class B diluted share, inclusive of $1.2 million, or $0.03 per Class B diluted share, of after-tax restructuring costs primarily related to the European consolidation plan. The fiscal year 2010 results also included the following items: a $7.7 million after-tax gain, or $0.20 per Class B diluted share, related to the sale of the facility and land in Poland, and $2.0 million of after-tax income, or $0.05 per Class B diluted share, resulting from settlement proceeds related to an antitrust class action lawsuit of which the Company was a class member. The Company recorded net income for fiscal year 2009 of $17.3 million, or $0.47 per Class B diluted share, inclusive of after-tax restructuring charges of $1.8 million, or $0.04 per Class B diluted share, primarily related to the European consolidation plan. The fiscal year 2009 results also included the following items: an $18.9 million after-tax gain, or $0.51 per Class B diluted share, related to the sale of the Company's undeveloped land holdings and timberlands; a $9.1 million after-tax non-cash goodwill impairment charge, or $0.24 per Class B diluted share; and $1.6 million of after-tax income, or $0.04 per Class B diluted share, for earnest money deposits retained by the Company resulting from the termination of a contract to sell the Company's Poland facility and land.

Consolidated gross profit as a percent of net sales declined to 15.7% for fiscal year 2010 from 16.8% in fiscal year 2009 due to a shift in sales mix (as depicted in the table below) toward the EMS segment which operates at a lower gross profit percentage than the Furniture segment. The EMS segment and Furniture segment gross profit as a percent of net sales both improved in fiscal year 2010 as compared to fiscal year 2009. Gross profit is discussed in more detail in the segment discussions below.

Segment Net Sales as a % of Consolidated Net Sales	Year Ended
	June 30
	2010		2009
EMS segment	63%		53%
Furniture segment	37%		47%

Fiscal year 2010 consolidated selling and administrative expenses increased slightly as a percent of net sales compared to fiscal year 2009, due to sales volumes declining at a quicker rate than the selling and administrative expenses. Consolidated selling and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2010 declined in absolute dollars by 6% compared to fiscal year 2009 primarily due to decreased labor expense, lower bad debt expense, lower depreciation and amortization expense, and other comprehensive cost reduction efforts throughout the Company. Partially offsetting these reductions, the Company experienced increased employee benefit costs primarily related to the reinstatement of the Company's retirement plan contribution, increased advertising and marketing costs, and increased incentive compensation costs at select business units during fiscal year 2010 as compared to fiscal year 2009.

In addition, in fiscal year 2010, the Company recorded $1.5 million of expense compared to $2.8 million of income in fiscal year 2009 related to the normal revaluation to fair value of its Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (SERP) liability. The result was an unfavorable variance in selling and administrative expenses of $4.3 million. As the general equity markets improved, the value of the SERP investments increased, causing additional selling and administrative expense related to the SERP liability. The SERP expense recorded in selling and administrative expenses was exactly offset by an increase in SERP investment income which was recorded in Other Income (Expense) as an investment gain; therefore, there was no effect on net earnings. The SERP investment is comprised of approximately 90% employee contributions.

27

---

Fiscal year 2010 Other General Income included a $6.7 million pre-tax gain within the EMS segment related to the sale of the facility and land in Poland. The Company is leasing a portion of the facility until it completes the transfer of production to its newly constructed facility in Poland. Fiscal year 2010 Other General Income also included $3.3 million of pre-tax income recorded in the EMS segment resulting from settlement proceeds related to an antitrust class action lawsuit of which the Company was a class member. The class action alleged the defendant sellers illegally conspired to fix prices for electronic components purchased by a business unit within the EMS segment. Other General Income in fiscal year 2009 included a $31.5 million pre-tax gain on the sale of undeveloped land holdings and timberlands. The gain on the sale of land holdings and timberlands was included in Unallocated Corporate in segment reporting. In addition, during fiscal year 2009, the Company had a conditional agreement to sell and lease back the facility that housed its Poland operations. However, the buyer was unable to close the transaction. As a result, the Company was entitled to retain approximately $1.9 million of the deposit funds held by the Company which was recorded as pre-tax income in Other General Income in the EMS segment. 

In fiscal year 2009, the Company recorded non-cash pre-tax goodwill impairment charges of $14.6 million as a result of interim goodwill impairment testing which was completed due to the uncertainty associated with the economy and the significant decline in the Company's sales and order trends during fiscal year 2009 as well as the increased disparity between the Company's market capitalization and the carrying value of its Share Owners' equity. The goodwill was related to prior acquisitions in both of the Company's segments. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on goodwill.

Other Income (Expense) included other income of $3.3 million for fiscal year 2010 compared to other expense of $0.4 million for fiscal year 2009. The $4.3 million favorable variance in SERP investments was the primary driver of the increased other income for fiscal year 2010. Interest expense for fiscal year 2010 was lower than fiscal year 2009 due to lower average outstanding debt balances coupled with lower interest rates. Interest income was likewise lower for fiscal year 2010 compared to fiscal year 2009 due to lower interest rates and lower average investment balances.

The fiscal year 2010 effective tax rate was (81.0)% compared to the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2009 of 31.6%. Relatively low pre-tax income coupled with a tax benefit due to the Company's tax planning strategy related to the sale of its Poland facility and land and the favorable impact of the Company's earnings mix resulted in a tax benefit in fiscal year 2010 despite the Company's pre-tax income. The mix of earnings between U.S. and foreign jurisdictions largely contributed to the overall tax benefit due to losses in the U.S. which have a higher statutory tax rate than the Company's foreign operations which were profitable in fiscal year 2010. In fiscal year 2009, the Company's foreign operations experienced losses while income was generated in the U.S. See Note 9 - Income Taxes of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

Comparing the balance sheet as of June 30, 2010 to June 30, 2009, the decline in short-term investments was due to the Company selling all of its municipal securities which resulted in a gain of $0.6 million. The Company's accounts receivable balance as of June 30, 2010 compared to June 30, 2009 increased due to the increased sales near the end of fiscal year 2010 as compared to sales near the end of fiscal year 2009. The Company's inventory balance as of June 30, 2010 increased from the June 30, 2009 level primarily to support production ramp up at select EMS facilities and also to support the transfer of production to the new EMS facility in Poland from the other EMS facilities in Europe. The Company's accounts payable balance increased in relation with the inventory increase. The decrease in property and equipment as of June 30, 2010 compared to June 30, 2009 was driven by the sale of the Poland facility and changes in the Euro to US dollar exchange rate. The Company had no borrowings under its credit facilities as of June 30, 2010 as the Company opted to pay off its short-term debt. The Company's Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) balance declined due to foreign currency translation adjustments. See Note 17 - Comprehensive Income of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

28

---

Electronic Manufacturing Services Segment

EMS segment results were as follows:

	At or for the Year Ended
(Amounts in Millions)	June 30
	2010		2009		% Change
Net Sales	$   709.1		$   642.8		10%
Operating Income (Loss)	$     15.3		$   (22.0)		170%
Net Income (Loss)	$     15.7		$   (11.8)		234%
Poland Land/Facility Gain, net of tax	$       7.7		$       -0-
Goodwill Impairment, net of tax	$       -0-		$      8.0
Restructuring Expense, net of tax	$       1.2		$      1.5
Open Orders	$   199.1		$  156.9		27%

Fiscal year 2010 EMS segment net sales to customers in the automotive, medical, industrial control, and public safety industries all increased compared to fiscal year 2009. While open orders were up 27% as of June 30, 2010 compared to June 30, 2009, open orders at a point in time may not be indicative of future sales trends due to the contract nature of the Company's business.

Fiscal year 2010 EMS segment gross profit as a percent of net sales improved 1.5 percentage points when compared to fiscal year 2009. The improvement was primarily driven by labor efficiency improvements and fixed cost leverage associated with the increased sales.

EMS segment selling and administrative expenses in absolute dollars decreased 1% in fiscal year 2010 as compared to fiscal year 2009 and also declined as a percent of net sales in fiscal year 2010 compared to fiscal year 2009 primarily because of the higher sales volumes. The reduction in selling and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2010 compared to fiscal year 2009 was primarily related to a decrease in overall salary expense, benefits realized from restructuring actions, lower depreciation/amortization expense, and other overall cost reduction efforts which were partially offset by higher incentive compensation costs.

EMS segment Other General Income for fiscal year 2010 included a $6.7 million pre-tax gain from the sale of the existing Poland facility and land. Including the tax benefit related to the sale of this facility and land, the after-tax gain was $7.7 million. In addition, Other General Income in fiscal year 2010 included $3.3 million of pre-tax income, or $2.0 million after-tax, resulting from settlement proceeds related to the antitrust class action lawsuit. EMS segment Other General Income for fiscal year 2009 included the $1.9 million pre-tax, or $1.6 million after-tax, amount retained by the Company resulting from the termination of a contract to sell the Company's Poland facility and land.

29

---

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company approved a plan to expand its European automotive electronics capabilities and to establish a European Medical Center of Expertise near Poznan, Poland. The Company previously had one operation in Poznan. Construction of a new, larger facility in Poland is complete and limited production has begun. The Company successfully completed the move of production from Longford, Ireland, into the existing Poznan facility during fiscal year 2009. During fiscal year 2010, the Company completed the sale of the existing Poland facility and land. The Company is leasing back the recently sold Poland facility until all production is moved to the new facility near Poznan, and the lease expires during the Company's fiscal year 2011. As part of the plan, the Company is also consolidating its EMS facilities located in Wales, United Kingdom, and Poznan, Poland, into the new facility near Poznan, which is expected to improve the Company's margins in the very competitive EMS market. The plan is being executed in stages with a projected final completion by mid-fiscal year 2012. See Note 18 - Restructuring Expense of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on restructuring charges. The restructuring expenses recorded in fiscal years 2010 and 2009 were primarily related to the European consolidation plan.

The fiscal year 2009 EMS segment earnings were also impacted by the recording of non-cash pre-tax goodwill impairment of $12.8 million, or $8.0 million after-tax.

As a percent of net sales, operating income (loss) was 2.2% for fiscal year 2010 and (3.4)% for fiscal year 2009.

During fiscal year 2010, the EMS segment recorded $1.0 million of tax income related to the sale of the facility and land in Poland instead of tax expense normally associated with a gain, as a result of a tax planning strategy. The fiscal year 2010 EMS segment income tax was also favorably impacted by the mix of earnings between U.S. and foreign EMS operations. The fiscal year 2009 EMS effective income tax rate was favorably impacted by a tax benefit related to its European operations which was primarily offset by the impact of losses in select foreign jurisdictions which have a lower tax rate.

Included in this segment are a significant amount of sales to Bayer AG affiliates which accounted for the following portions of consolidated net sales and EMS segment net sales:

	Year Ended June 30
	2010		2009
Bayer AG affiliated sales as a percent of consolidated net sales	15%		12%
Bayer AG affiliated sales as a percent of EMS segment net sales	24%		23%

The Company's sales to Bayer AG are expected to begin to decline in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011 as the Company's manufacturing contract with Bayer AG reaches end-of-life.  Margins on the Bayer AG product are generally lower than the Company's other EMS products. The nature of the electronic manufacturing services industry is such that the start-up of new customers and new programs to replace expiring programs occurs frequently. New customer and program start-ups generally cause losses early in the life of a program, which are generally recovered as the program becomes established and matures. This segment continues to experience margin pressures related to an overall excess capacity position in the electronics subcontracting services market.

Risk factors within the EMS segment include, but are not limited to, general economic and market conditions, customer order delays, increased globalization, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, rapid technological changes, component availability, supplier stability, the contract nature of this industry, unexpected integration issues with acquisitions, the concentration of sales to large customers, and the potential for customers to choose to in-source a greater portion of their electronics manufacturing. The continuing success of this segment is dependent upon its ability to replace expiring customers/programs with new customers/programs. Additional risk factors that could have an effect on the Company's performance are located within Item 1A - Risk Factors.

30

---

Furniture Segment

Furniture segment results were as follows:

	At or for the Year Ended
	June 30
(Amounts in Millions)	2010		2009		% Change
Net Sales	$ 413.6		$ 564.6		(27)%
Operating Income (Loss)	$   (9.4)		$   13.8		(168)%
Net Income (Loss)	$   (5.8)		$     8.3		(169)%
Goodwill Impairment, net of tax	$     -0-		$     1.1
Restructuring (Income) Expense, net of tax	$   (0.1)		$     0.1
Open Orders	$   70.6		$   70.2		1%

The fiscal year 2010 net sales decline in the Furniture segment compared to fiscal year 2009 resulted from decreased net sales of both office furniture and hospitality furniture. The decline in office furniture sales was primarily due to decreased sales volumes, with higher discounting net of price increases contributing to a lesser extent. Fiscal year 2010 sales of newly introduced office furniture products which have been sold for less than twelve months approximated $20.9 million. Open orders of furniture products at June 30, 2010 approximated the open orders levels as of June 30, 2009 as increased open orders for office furniture were primarily offset by decreased orders for hospitality furniture. Open orders at a point in time may not be indicative of future sales trends.

Fiscal year 2010 Furniture segment gross profit as a percent of net sales improved 0.3 percentage points when compared to fiscal year 2009. Items contributing to the improved gross profit as a percent of net sales included: price increases on select product, lower commodity costs, a sales mix shift to higher margin product, lower employee benefit costs, and other overall cost reduction efforts. These improvements more than offset the negative impact of the lower absorption of fixed costs associated with the lower net sales, increased discounting resulting from competitive pricing pressures, and increased costs related to the reinstatement of the Company's retirement plan contribution for fiscal year 2010. Due to the significant decline in sales volume, the fiscal year 2010 gross profit dollars declined as compared to fiscal year 2009.

Fiscal year 2010 selling and administrative expenses decreased in absolute dollars by 11%, but increased as a percent of net sales on the lower sales volumes, when compared to fiscal year 2009. The fiscal year 2010 selling and administrative expense decline resulted from lower overall salary expense realized from past restructurings and the salary reduction plan implemented by the Company in fiscal year 2009, lower commission costs related to the lower sales volumes, lower bad debt expense, and other improvements resulting from the focus on managing all costs. Partially offsetting the lower costs were higher advertising and product marketing expenses, increased costs related to the reinstatement of the Company's retirement plan contribution, and higher severance costs due to scaling operations.

The Furniture segment earnings for fiscal year 2009 were impacted by the recording of non-cash pre-tax goodwill impairment of $1.8 million, which equated to $1.1 million after-tax.

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company approved a restructuring plan to consolidate production of select office furniture manufacturing departments. The consolidation reduced manufacturing costs and excess capacity by eliminating redundant property and equipment, processes, and employee costs. Most of the consolidation activities occurred during fiscal year 2009, and the remaining activities were completed during fiscal year 2010.

As a percent of net sales, operating income (loss) was (2.3)% for fiscal year 2010 and 2.4% for fiscal year 2009.

Risk factors within this segment include, but are not limited to, general economic and market conditions, increased global competition, financial stability of customers, supply chain cost pressures, and relationships with strategic customers and product distributors. Additional risk factors that could have an effect on the Company's performance are located within Item 1A - Risk Factors.

31

---

Fiscal Year 2009 Results of Operations

The following discussions are based on income from continuing operations and therefore exclude all income statement activity of the discontinued operation which only impacted the fiscal year 2008 results. There was no activity related to discontinued operations in fiscal year 2009, and therefore the fiscal year 2009 net income and income from continuing operations were equivalent. See Note 19 - Discontinued Operation of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the discontinued operation.

Financial Overview - Consolidated

Fiscal year 2009 consolidated net sales were $1.21 billion compared to fiscal year 2008 net sales of $1.35 billion, an 11% decrease, due to decreased net sales in both the EMS segment and the Furniture segment. The Company recorded income from continuing operations for fiscal year 2009 of $17.3 million, or $0.47 per Class B diluted share, inclusive of after-tax restructuring charges of $1.8 million, or $0.04 per Class B diluted share. The fiscal year 2009 restructuring charges were primarily related to the European consolidation plan. The fiscal year 2009 results also included the following items: an $18.9 million after-tax gain, or $0.51 per Class B diluted share, related to the sale of the Company's undeveloped land holdings and timberlands; a $9.1 million after-tax non-cash goodwill impairment charge, or $0.24 per Class B diluted share; and $1.6 million of after-tax income, or $0.04 per Class B diluted share, for earnest money deposits retained by the Company resulting from the termination of a contract to sell the Company's Poland facility and land. The Company recorded income from continuing operations for fiscal year 2008 of $0.1 million, or less than $0.01 per Class B diluted share, inclusive of after-tax restructuring charges of $14.6 million, or $0.39 per Class B diluted share. The fiscal year 2008 restructuring charges were primarily related to the European consolidation plan, a workforce reduction plan, and the exit of two domestic EMS facilities.

Consolidated gross profit as a percent of net sales in fiscal year 2009 was 16.8% compared to 18.4% in fiscal year 2008. Both the EMS segment and the Furniture segment contributed to the decline as discussed in more detail in the segment discussions below.

Fiscal year 2009 consolidated selling and administrative expenses declined as a percent of net sales and also declined in absolute dollars by 17% as compared to fiscal year 2008. The improved selling and administrative expenses were primarily related to benefits realized as a result of the previously announced restructurings; lower salary and wage expense; lower incentive compensation and employee benefit costs which are linked to Company profitability; lower depreciation and amortization expense; lower sales and marketing incentive costs; lower travel costs; and other improvements resulting from the focus on managing all costs as a result of the macroeconomic conditions. Partially offsetting these cost declines, bad debt expense was $3.8 million higher for fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year 2008 as a result of market conditions. Additionally, during fiscal years 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded $2.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively, of favorable adjustments due to reductions in its SERP liability resulting from the normal revaluation of the liability to fair value. The result for the fiscal year comparison was a favorable variance in selling and administrative expenses of $1.5 million. The gain resulting from the reduction of the SERP liability that was recognized in selling and administrative expenses was exactly offset by a decline in the SERP investment which was recorded in Other Income (Expense), and thus there was no effect on net earnings. The SERP investment is primarily comprised of employee contributions.

Fiscal year 2009 Other General Income included a $31.5 million pre-tax gain on the sale of undeveloped land holdings and timberlands. The gain on the sale was included in Unallocated Corporate in segment reporting. Also impacting the fiscal year 2009 Other General Income was $1.9 million pre-tax income from earnest money deposits retained by the Company resulting from the termination of a contract to sell and lease back the Company's Poland facility and land. The buyer was unable to close the transaction, and as a result, the Company was entitled to retain the deposit funds. This income was recorded in the EMS segment.

The Company recorded non-cash pre-tax goodwill impairment charges of $14.6 million during fiscal year 2009 as a result of interim goodwill impairment testing which was completed due to the continued uncertainty associated with the economy and the significant decline in the Company's sales and order trends as well as the increased disparity between the Company's market capitalization and the carrying value of its Share Owners' equity. The goodwill was related to prior acquisitions in both of the Company's segments. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on goodwill.

32

---

Fiscal year 2009 other expense totaled $0.4 million compared to fiscal year 2008 other income of $3.2 million. The $1.5 million variance in SERP investments contributed to the increased other expenses. Fiscal year 2008 other income also included $1.3 million of pre-tax income relating to funds received as part of a Polish offset credit program for investments made in the Company's Poland operation.

The Company's effective tax rate for fiscal year 2009 was 31.6%. The fiscal year 2009 effective tax rate was positively impacted by a tax benefit related to a European subsidiary and to a lesser extent various tax benefits such as tax-exempt interest income and the research and development credit which together more than offset the negative impact of losses generated in select foreign jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the domestic rate. As a result of various tax benefits in fiscal year 2008, such as tax-exempt interest income and the research and development credit, coupled with the tax benefit recorded related to the pre-tax loss, the Company recorded an overall income tax benefit greater than the pre-tax loss in fiscal year 2008. For further detail see Note 9 - Income Taxes of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Electronic Manufacturing Services Segment

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company acquired privately-held Genesis Electronics Manufacturing of Tampa, Florida, for $5.4 million. The acquisition supports the Company's growth and diversification strategy, bringing new customers in the Company's key medical and industrial control markets. The operating results of this acquisition were included in the Company's consolidated financial statements beginning on September 1, 2008 and excluding the related goodwill impairment had an immaterial impact on the fiscal year 2009 financial results. See Note 2 - Acquisition of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the acquisition.

EMS segment results were as follows:

	At or For the Year Ended
	June 30
(Amounts in Millions)	2009		2008		% Change
Net Sales	$  642.8		$  727.1		(12)%
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations	$   (11.8)		$  (15.3)		23%
Restructuring Expense, net of tax	$      1.5		$    12.8
Goodwill Impairment, net of tax	$      8.0		$       -0-
Open Orders	$  156.9		$  205.8		(24)%

Fiscal year 2009 net sales to customers in the automotive and industrial control industries experienced double digit percentage declines compared to fiscal year 2008. To a lesser extent, sales to customers in the medical industry also declined, and sales to customers in the public safety industry increased when compared to fiscal year 2008.

Fiscal year 2009 EMS segment gross profit as a percent of net sales declined 1.7 percentage points compared to fiscal year 2008 primarily due to lower volumes; inefficiencies in the segment's European operations which are currently being consolidated into one facility; a shift in sales mix to lower margin product; higher employee healthcare costs; higher depreciation expense; and contractual customer price reductions on select products. Partially mitigating the lower margins were benefits the segment realized on the North American consolidation activities which were completed late in fiscal year 2008.

The EMS segment achieved a 25% reduction in selling and administrative expense in absolute dollars for fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year 2008. Selling and administrative expenses also decreased 1.5 percentage points as a percent of net sales. The improvement was primarily related to benefits realized from restructuring activities, reduced spending on travel, lower depreciation/amortization expense, and a strong focus on managing all costs including labor reductions as a result of the macroeconomic conditions during fiscal year 2009. Lower incentive compensation costs and lower employee benefit costs which are linked to Company profitability also contributed to the selling and administrative expense reduction as compared to fiscal year 2008.

33

---

The restructuring expense recorded in fiscal year 2009 was primarily related to the European consolidation plan. The fiscal year 2008 restructuring expense was primarily related to the European consolidation plan, a workforce reduction plan, and the exit of two domestic EMS facilities.

Fiscal year 2009 Other General Income included $1.9 million pre-tax, which equated to $1.6 million after-tax, income from the earnest money deposits retained by the Company resulting from the termination of a contract to sell and lease back the Company's Poland facility and land.

The fiscal year 2009 EMS segment earnings were also impacted by the recording of non-cash pre-tax goodwill impairment of $12.8 million, which equated to $8.0 million after-tax. During fiscal year 2008, goodwill impairment of $0.2 million pre-tax was recorded on the Restructuring line item of the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income as it related to a restructuring plan.

The fiscal year 2008 other income/(expense) included $1.3 million of pre-tax, or $0.7 million of after-tax, income relating to funds received as part of a Polish offset credit program for investments made in the Company's Poland operation.

Included in this segment are a significant amount of sales to Bayer AG affiliates which accounted for the following portions of consolidated net sales and EMS segment net sales:

	Year Ended June 30
	2009		2008
Bayer AG affiliated sales as a percent of consolidated net sales	12%		11%
Bayer AG affiliated sales as a percent of EMS segment net sales	23%		21%

Furniture Segment

Furniture segment results were as follows:

	At or For the Year Ended
	June 30
(Amounts in Millions)	2009		2008		% Change
Net Sales	$ 564.6		$ 624.8		(10)%
Income from Continuing Operations	$     8.3		$   13.4		(38)%
Restructuring Expense, net of tax	$     0.1		$     1.3
Goodwill Impairment, net of tax	$     1.1		$      -0-
Open Orders	$   70.2		$ 101.0		(31)%

The net sales decline in the Furniture segment for fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year 2008 resulted from decreased net sales of office furniture which were partially offset by increased net sales of hospitality furniture. Price increases net of higher discounting contributed approximately $9.6 million to net sales during fiscal year 2009 when compared to fiscal year 2008. Fiscal year 2009 sales of newly introduced office furniture products which had been sold for less than twelve months approximated $26.8 million. Furniture products open orders at June 30, 2009 declined when compared to the open orders at June 30, 2008 due to decreased open orders for both office furniture and hospitality furniture.

34

---

Fiscal year 2009 gross profit as a percent of net sales declined 1.8 percentage points when compared to fiscal year 2008. In addition to the impact of the lower net sales level, gross profit was negatively impacted by higher commodity costs, increased discounting on select product, costs incurred for supplier-related issues, and a sales mix shift to lower margin product. Partially offsetting the higher costs were price increases on select office furniture products, labor efficiency improvements, decreased employee benefit costs which are linked to Company profitability, and a decrease in LIFO inventory reserves resulting from lower inventory levels which positively impacted the fiscal year 2009 gross profit.

Fiscal year 2009 selling and administrative expenses decreased in both absolute dollars and as a percent of net sales compared to fiscal year 2008. The selling and administrative expense decline resulted from lower salary expenses related to the workforce reduction restructuring activities, lower sales and marketing incentive costs, lower travel expense, lower incentive compensation and employee benefit costs which are linked to Company profitability, and other improvements resulting from the focus on managing all costs. Partially offsetting the selling and administrative expense improvements was increased bad debt expense of approximately $2.6 million on a pre-tax basis in fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year 2008.

The fiscal year 2008 restructuring charges were primarily related to the workforce reduction plan.

The fiscal year 2009 Furniture segment earnings were also impacted by the recording of non-cash pre-tax goodwill impairment of $1.8 million, which equated to $1.1 million after-tax.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working capital at June 30, 2010 was $180.0 million compared to working capital of $176.2 million at June 30, 2009. The current ratio was 1.8 at both June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009.

The Company's internal measure of accounts receivable performance, also referred to as Days Sales Outstanding (DSO), for fiscal year 2010 of 47.8 days approximated the 47.2 days for fiscal year 2009. The Company defines DSO as the average of monthly accounts and notes receivable divided by an average day's net sales. The Company's Production Days Supply on Hand (PDSOH) of inventory measure for fiscal year 2010 decreased to 63.0 days from 65.6 days for fiscal year 2009. The PDSOH in fiscal year 2009 was unfavorably impacted by a rapid decline in EMS segment sales volumes. During fiscal year 2010, the Company worked to align inventory levels with sales levels, resulting in lower PDSOH. The Company defines PDSOH as the average of the monthly gross inventory divided by an average day's cost of sales.

The Company's short-term liquidity available, represented as cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments plus the unused amount of the Company's revolving credit facility, totaled $163.6 million at June 30, 2010 compared to $183.7 million at June 30, 2009.

During fiscal year 2010, the Company sold all of its municipal securities which resulted in a realized gain of $0.6 million. See Note 13 - Short-Term Investments of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

35

---

The Company's net cash position from an aggregate of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments less short-term borrowings under credit facilities decreased from $88.6 million at June 30, 2009 to $67.8 million at June 30, 2010. The Company had no short-term borrowings as of June 30, 2010. Operating activities generated $13.4 million of cash flow in fiscal year 2010 compared to the $84.2 million of cash generated by operating activities in fiscal year 2009. During fiscal year 2010 as compared to fiscal year 2009, the negative cash impact of increased accounts receivable and inventory balances to support increased EMS sales were only partially offset by increased accounts payable. During fiscal year 2010, the Company reinvested $35.4 million into capital investments for the future, primarily for manufacturing equipment in both segments and the new Poland facility, which is part of the plan to consolidate the European manufacturing footprint. The Company also had proceeds from the sale of assets of $12.9 million during fiscal year 2010 primarily related to the sale of the Poland facility which is being replaced by the newly constructed EMS facility also in Poland. The proceeds from the sale of assets during fiscal year 2009 of $49.9 million were primarily related to the sale of the Company's undeveloped land holdings and timberlands. Financing cash flow activities for fiscal year 2010 included $12.2 million in payments on the revolving credit facility as the Company opted to pay down the facility to a zero balance. The Company also had $7.3 million in dividend payments, which was a decrease from the $19.4 million of dividends paid during fiscal year 2009. The decline in dividends paid was a result of reduced dividend rates beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 to preserve cash. Consistent with the Company's historical dividend policy, the Company's Board of Directors will evaluate the appropriate dividend payment on a quarterly basis. During fiscal year 2011, the Company expects to minimize capital expenditures where appropriate but will continue to invest in capital expenditures prudently, particularly for projects that would enhance the Company's capabilities and diversification while providing an opportunity for growth and improved profitability as the economy and the Company's markets recover.

At June 30, 2010, the Company had no short-term borrowings outstanding under its $100 million credit facility described in more detail below. The Company also has several smaller foreign credit facilities available described in more detail below and likewise had no borrowings outstanding under these facilities as of June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2009, the Company had $12.7 million of short-term borrowings outstanding.

At June 30, 2010, the Company had $4.2 million in letters of credit against the $100 million credit facility. Total availability to borrow under the $100 million credit facility was $95.8 million at June 30, 2010.

The Company maintains the $100 million credit facility with an expiration date in April 2013 that allows for both issuances of letters of credit and cash borrowings. The $100 million credit facility provides an option to increase the amount available for borrowing to $150 million at the Company's request, subject to the consent of the participating banks. The $100 million credit facility, upon which there were no borrowings at June 30, 2010, requires the Company to comply with certain financial covenants including interest coverage ratio and minimum net worth. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at June 30, 2010.

The Company believes the most significant covenants under its $100 million credit facility are minimum net worth and interest coverage ratio. The table below compares the actual net worth and interest coverage ratio with the limits specified in the credit agreement.

Covenant		At or For the Period Ended June 30, 2010		Limit As Specified in Credit Agreement		Excess
Minimum Net Worth		$377,428,000		$362,000,000		$15,428,000
Interest Coverage Ratio		34.6		3.0		31.6

The Interest Coverage Ratio is calculated on a rolling four-quarter basis as defined in the credit agreement.

 

36

---

In addition to the $100 million credit facility, the Company can opt to utilize foreign credit facilities which are available to satisfy short-term cash needs at that specific location rather than funding from intercompany sources. The Company maintains a foreign credit facility for its EMS segment operation in Thailand which is backed by the $100 million revolving credit facility. The Company has a credit facility for its EMS segment operation in Poland, which allows for multi-currency borrowings up to 6 million Euro equivalent (approximately $7.4 million U.S. dollars at June 30, 2010 exchange rates). The Company also has a credit facility for its EMS segment operation in China which allows for multi-currency borrowings up to $5 million. These foreign credit facilities can be cancelled at any time by either the bank or the Company.

The Company believes its principal sources of liquidity from available funds on hand, cash generated from operations, and the availability of borrowing under the Company's credit facilities will be sufficient for fiscal year 2011 and the foreseeable future. One of the Company's sources of funds has been its ability to generate cash from operations to meet its liquidity obligations, which during fiscal year 2010 was hampered by lower sales volumes and could also be adversely affected in the future by factors such as general economic and market conditions, a decline in demand for the Company's products, loss of key contract customers, the ability of the Company to generate profits, and other unforeseen circumstances. In particular, should demand for the Company's products decrease significantly over the next 12 months due to the weakened economy, the available cash provided by operations could be adversely impacted. Another source of funds is the Company's credit facilities. The $100 million credit facility is contingent on complying with certain debt covenants.

The preceding statements are forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain factors could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

Fair Value

During fiscal year 2010, no financial assets were affected by a lack of market liquidity. For level 1 financial assets, readily available market pricing was used to value the financial instruments. For available-for-sale securities classified as level 2 assets, the fair values are determined based on observable market inputs which use evaluated pricing models that vary by asset class and incorporate available trade, bid, and other market information. The Company evaluated the inputs used to value the instruments and validated the accuracy of the instrument fair values based on historical evidence. The Company's foreign currency derivatives, which were classified as level 2 assets/liabilities, were independently valued using a financial risk management software package using observable market inputs such as forward interest rate yield curves, current spot rates, and time value calculations. To verify the reasonableness of the independently determined fair values, these derivative fair values were compared to fair values calculated by the counterparty banks. The Company's own credit risk and counterparty credit risk had an immaterial impact on the valuation of the foreign currency derivatives.

The Company invested in convertible promissory notes and stock warrants of a privately-held company during fiscal year 2010 and has been chosen by the privately-held company as its primary supplier to produce EMS products in the future. The convertible promissory notes, classified as available-for-sale debt securities, were valued using a recurring market-based method which approximates fair value by using the amortized cost basis of the promissory notes, with the discount amortized to interest income over the term. The stock warrants, classified as derivative instruments, were valued on a recurring basis using a market-based method which utilizes the Black-Scholes valuation model. The fair value measurements for the convertible promissory notes and stock warrants were calculated using unobservable inputs and were classified as level 3 financial assets.

See Note 11 - Fair Value of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

37

---

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the Company's contractual obligations as of June 30, 2010.

	Payments Due During Fiscal Years Ending June 30
(Amounts in Millions)	Total		2011		2012-2013		2014-2015		Thereafter
Recorded Contractual Obligations (a):
Long-Term Debt Obligations (b)	$   0.4		$    0.1		$  0.0		$  0.1		$  0.2
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Balance Sheet (c) (d) (e)	31.6		9.6		10.1		3.1		8.8
Unrecorded Contractual Obligations:
Operating Leases (e)	13.5		3.7		5.0		3.3		1.5
Purchase Obligations (f)	272.0		258.7		8.0		5.3		0.0
Other	0.7		0.1		0.4		0.1		0.1
Total	$318.2		$272.2		$23.5		$11.9		$10.6

(a) As of June 30, 2010, the Company had no Capital Lease Obligations.

(b) Refer to Note 6 - Long-Term Debt and Credit Facility of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding Long-Term Debt Obligations. Accrued interest is also included on the Long-Term Debt Obligations line. The fiscal year 2011 amount includes $0.1 million of long-term debt obligations due in fiscal year 2011 which was recorded as a current liability. The estimated interest not yet accrued related to debt is included in the Other line item within the Unrecorded Contractual Obligations.

(c) The timing of payments of certain items included on the "Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Balance Sheet" line above is estimated based on the following assumptions:

The timing of SERP payments is estimated based on an assumed retirement age of 62 with payout based on the prior distribution elections of participants. The fiscal year 2011 amount includes $4.8 million for SERP payments recorded as current liabilities. The timing of employee transition payments related to facilities to be exited is estimated based on the expected termination in the underlying restructuring plan. The fiscal year 2011 amount also includes $2.5 million for restructuring employee transition payments and the related derivatives recorded as a current liability. The timing of severance plan payments is estimated based on the average service life of employees. The fiscal year 2011 amount also includes $1.0 million for severance payments recorded as a current liability. The timing of warranty payments is estimated based on historical data. The fiscal year 2011 amount includes $1.2 million for short-term warranty payments recorded as a current liability.

(d) Excludes $3.9 million of long-term unrecognized tax benefits and associated accrued interest and penalties along with deferred tax liabilities and miscellaneous other long-term tax liabilities which are not tied to a contractual obligation and for which the Company cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period of future payments.

(e) Refer to Note 5 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding Operating Leases and certain Other Long-Term Liabilities.

(f) Purchase Obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms. The amounts listed above for purchase obligations include contractual commitments for items such as raw materials, supplies, capital expenditures, services, and software acquisitions/license commitments. Cancellable purchase obligations that the Company intends to fulfill are also included in the purchase obligations amount listed above through fiscal year 2015. In certain instances, such as when lead times dictate, the Company enters into contractual agreements for material in excess of the levels required to fulfill customer orders. In turn, agreements with the customers cover a portion of that exposure for the material which was purchased prior to having a firm order.

38

---

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements other than standby letters of credit and operating leases entered into in the normal course of business. These arrangements do not have a material current effect and are not reasonably likely to have a material future effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources. See Note 5 - Commitments and Contingent Liabilities of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on standby letters of credit. The Company does not have material exposures to trading activities of non-exchange traded contracts.

The preceding statements are forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain factors could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company's consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require the use of estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and related notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions. Management uses its best judgment in the assumptions used to value these estimates, which are based on current facts and circumstances, prior experience, and other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable. The Company's management overlays a fundamental philosophy of valuing its assets and liabilities in an appropriately conservative manner. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect the more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements and are the policies that are most critical in the portrayal of the Company's financial position and results of operations. Management has discussed these critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors and with the Company's independent registered public accounting firm.

Revenue recognition - The Company recognizes revenue when title and risk transfer to the customer, which under the terms and conditions of the sale may occur either at the time of shipment or when the product is delivered to the customer. Service revenue is recognized as services are rendered. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are recorded as sales while the related shipping and handling costs are included in cost of goods sold. The Company recognizes sales net of applicable sales tax.

• Sales returns and allowances - At the time revenue is recognized certain provisions may also be recorded, including a provision for returns and allowances, which involve estimates based on current discussions with applicable customers, historical experience with a particular customer and/or product, and other relevant factors. As such, these factors may change over time causing the provisions to be adjusted accordingly. At June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the reserve for returns and allowances was $2.5 million and $4.4 million, respectively. The returns and allowances reserve approximated 2% to 3% of gross trade receivables during the past two fiscal years.
  
  
• Allowance for doubtful accounts - Allowance for doubtful accounts is generally based on a percentage of aged accounts receivable, where the percentage increases as the accounts receivable become older. However, management judgment is utilized in the final determination of the allowance based on several factors including specific analysis of a customer's credit worthiness, changes in a customer's payment history, historical bad debt experience, and general economic and market trends. The allowance for doubtful accounts at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was $1.3 million and $3.1 million, respectively. During the preceding two-year period, this reserve had approximated 1% of gross trade accounts receivable except for the period March 2009 through December 2009 during which time it approximated 2% of gross trade accounts receivable. The higher reserve was driven by increased risk created by deteriorating market conditions during that time.

39

---

Excess and obsolete inventory - Inventories were valued using the lower of last-in, first-out (LIFO) cost or market value for approximately 9% and 14% of consolidated inventories at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, including approximately 78% and 83% of the Furniture segment inventories at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. The remaining inventories were valued at lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market value. Inventories recorded on the Company's balance sheet are adjusted for excess and obsolete inventory. In general, the Company purchases materials and finished goods for contract-based business from customer orders and projections, primarily in the case of long lead time items, and has a general philosophy to only purchase materials to the extent covered by a written commitment from its customers. However, there are times when inventory is purchased beyond customer commitments due to minimum lot sizes and inventory lead time requirements, or where component allocation or other procurement issues may exist. The Company may also purchase additional inventory to support transfers of production between manufacturing facilities. Evaluation of excess inventory includes such factors as anticipated usage, inventory turnover, inventory levels, and product demand levels. Factors considered when evaluating inventory obsolescence include the age of on-hand inventory and reduction in value due to damage, use as showroom samples, design changes, or cessation of product lines.

Self-insurance reserves - The Company is self-insured up to certain limits for auto and general liability, workers' compensation, and certain employee health benefits such as medical, short-term disability, and dental with the related liabilities included in the accompanying financial statements. The Company's policy is to estimate reserves based upon a number of factors including known claims, estimated incurred but not reported claims, and other analyses, which are based on historical information along with certain assumptions about future events. Changes in assumptions for such matters as increased medical costs and changes in actual experience could cause these estimates to change and reserve levels to be adjusted accordingly. At June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the Company's accrued liabilities for self-insurance exposure were $4.7 million and $6.5 million, respectively.

Taxes - Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. These assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The Company evaluates the recoverability of its deferred tax assets each quarter by assessing the likelihood of future profitability and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize its deferred tax assets. If recovery is not likely, the Company provides a valuation allowance based on its best estimate of future taxable income in the various taxing jurisdictions and the amount of deferred taxes ultimately realizable. Future events could change management's assessment.

The Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to tax audits in these jurisdictions. These audits can involve complex issues, which may require an extended period of time to resolve. However, the Company believes it has made adequate provision for income and other taxes for all years that are subject to audit. As tax periods are effectively settled, the provision will be adjusted accordingly. The liability for uncertain income tax and other tax positions, including accrued interest and penalties on those positions, was $3.7 million at June 30, 2010 and $3.5 million at June 30, 2009.

Goodwill - Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the related underlying tangible and intangible net asset fair values resulting from business acquisitions. Annually, or if conditions indicate an interim review is necessary, the Company compares the carrying value of the reporting unit to an estimate of the reporting unit's fair value to identify potential impairment. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, a second step is performed to determine the amount of potential goodwill impairment. If impaired, goodwill is written down to its estimated implied fair value. Goodwill is assigned to and the fair value is tested at the reporting unit level. The fair value is established primarily using a discounted cash flow analysis and secondarily a market approach utilizing current industry information. The calculation of the fair value of the reporting units considers current market conditions existing at the assessment date. In addition to performing the required annual testing, the Company will continue to monitor circumstances and events in future periods to determine whether additional goodwill impairment testing is warranted on an interim basis. The Company can provide no assurance that an impairment charge for the Company's remaining goodwill balance, which approximates only 0.4% of total assets, will not occur in future periods as a result of these analyses. At June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the Company's goodwill, net of accumulated impairment losses, totaled $2.4 million and $2.6 million, respectively.

40

---

New Accounting Standards

See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding New Accounting Standards.  

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Page No.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting	43
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	44
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and 2009	45
Consolidated Statements of Income for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended June 30, 2010	46
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended June 30, 2010	47
Consolidated Statements of Share Owners' Equity for Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended June 30, 2010	48
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	49-87

 

		/s/ James C. Thyen
		JAMES C. THYEN President, Chief Executive Officer
		August 30, 2010
		/s/ Robert F. Schneider
		ROBERT F. SCHNEIDER Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
		August 30, 2010

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Indianapolis, Indiana August 30, 2010