Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - FORM 8-K - STERLING CONSTRUCTION CO INC | h68920e8vk.htm |
EX-2.1 - EX-2.1 - STERLING CONSTRUCTION CO INC | h68920exv2w1.htm |
EX-99.2 - EX-99.2 - STERLING CONSTRUCTION CO INC | h68920exv99w2.htm |
EX-23.2 - EX-23.2 - STERLING CONSTRUCTION CO INC | h68920exv23w2.htm |
EX-99.1 - EX-99.1 - STERLING CONSTRUCTION CO INC | h68920exv99w1.htm |
EX-99.3 - EX-99.3 - STERLING CONSTRUCTION CO INC | h68920exv99w3.htm |
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - STERLING CONSTRUCTION CO INC | h68920exv23w1.htm |
EX-99.5 - EX-99.5 - STERLING CONSTRUCTION CO INC | h68920exv99w5.htm |
Exhibit
99.4
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board
of Directors and Shareholders of
Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and subsidiaries
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 16,
2009 expressed an unqualified opinion that Sterling Construction
Company, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ GRANT
THORNTON LLP
Houston, Texas
March 16, 2009, except for the last paragraph of Note 1 and
for Note 18 as to which the date is December 3, 2009
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board
of Directors and Shareholders
Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
We have audited Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (a Delaware
Corporation) and subsidiaries internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Sterling
Construction Company, Inc. and subsidiaries management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and subsidiaries
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Sterling Construction Company Inc. and
subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Sterling Construction Company
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2008 and our report
dated March 16, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on
those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ GRANT
THORNTON LLP
Houston, Texas
March 16, 2009
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
As
of December 31, 2008 and 2007
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
(Amounts in thousands except share data) |
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current assets:
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 55,305 | $ | 80,649 | ||||
Short-term investments
|
24,379 | 54 | ||||||
Contracts receivable, including retainage
|
60,582 | 54,394 | ||||||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
7,508 | 3,747 | ||||||
Inventories
|
1,041 | 1,239 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset, net
|
1,203 | 1,088 | ||||||
Deposits and other current assets
|
2,704 | 1,779 | ||||||
Total current assets
|
152,722 | 142,950 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
77,993 | 72,389 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
57,232 | 57,232 | ||||||
Other assets, net
|
1,668 | 1,944 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 289,615 | $ | 274,515 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | 26,111 | $ | 27,190 | ||||
Billings in excess of cost and estimated earnings on uncompleted
contracts
|
23,127 | 25,349 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
73 | 98 | ||||||
Income taxes payable
|
547 | 1,102 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses
|
7,741 | 7,148 | ||||||
Total current liabilities
|
57,599 | 60,887 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities:
|
||||||||
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
55,483 | 65,556 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability, net
|
11,117 | 3,098 | ||||||
Put liability related to and noncontrolling owners interest in subsidiary
|
6,300 | 6,362 | ||||||
72,900 | 75,016 | |||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized
1,000,000 shares, none issued
|
| | ||||||
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized
19,000,000 shares, 13,184,638 and 13,006,502 shares
issued and outstanding
|
131 | 130 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital
|
150,223 | 147,786 | ||||||
Retained earnings (deficit)
|
8,762 | (9,304 | ) | |||||
Total Sterling common stockholders equity
|
159,116 | 138,612 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
$ | 289,615 | $ | 274,515 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands, except share and |
||||||||||||
per share data) | ||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 415,074 | $ | 306,220 | $ | 249,348 | ||||||
Cost of revenues
|
373,102 | 272,534 | 220,801 | |||||||||
Gross profit
|
41,972 | 33,686 | 28,547 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses
|
(13,763 | ) | (13,231 | ) | (10,825 | ) | ||||||
Other income (expense)
|
(81 | ) | 549 | 276 | ||||||||
Operating income
|
28,128 | 21,004 | 17,998 | |||||||||
Interest income
|
1,070 | 1,669 | 1,426 | |||||||||
Interest expense
|
(199 | ) | (277 | ) | (220 | ) | ||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
minority interest
|
28,999 | 22,396 | 19,204 | |||||||||
Income tax expense:
|
||||||||||||
Current
|
(1,087 | ) | (1,290 | ) | (310 | ) | ||||||
Deferred
|
(8,938 | ) | (6,600 | ) | (6,256 | ) | ||||||
Total income tax expense
|
(10,025 | ) | (7,890 | ) | (6,566 | ) | ||||||
Income from continuing operations
|
18,974 | 14,506 | 12,638 | |||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, including gain on disposal
of $121 in 2006
|
| | 682 | |||||||||
Net income
|
18,974 | 14,506 | 13,320 | |||||||||
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest in
subsidiary
|
(908 | ) | (62 | ) | | |||||||
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
$ | 18,066 | $ | 14,444 | $ | 13,320 | ||||||
Basic net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders:
|
||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations
|
$ | 1.38 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 1.19 | ||||||
Net income from discontinued operations
|
| | $ | 0.06 | ||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 1.38 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 1.25 | ||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding in computing basic
per share amounts
|
13,119,987 | 11,043,948 | 10,582,730 | |||||||||
Diluted net income per share attributable to Sterling common
stockholders:
|
||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations
|
$ | 1.32 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 1.08 | ||||||
Net income from discontinued operations
|
| | $ | 0.06 | ||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 1.32 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 1.14 | ||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding in computing
diluted per share amounts
|
13,702,488 | 11,836,176 | 11,714,310 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
For
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Additional |
Retained |
|||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
Paid in |
Earnings |
||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | (Deficit) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
8,165 | $ | 82 | $ | 82,822 | $ | (34,293 | ) | $ | 48,611 | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
13,320 | 13,320 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon option and warrant exercises
|
701 | 7 | 906 | 913 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense
|
991 | 991 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued in equity offering, net of expenses
|
2,003 | 20 | 27,019 | 27,039 | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock
|
6 | | 117 | 117 | ||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
2,775 | (2,775 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
10,875 | 109 | 114,630 | (23,748 | ) | 90,991 | ||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
14,444 | 14,444 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon option and warrant exercises
|
241 | 2 | 511 | 513 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense
|
912 | 912 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued in equity offering, net of expenses
|
1,840 | 18 | 34,471 | 34,489 | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock
|
10 | | 198 | 198 | ||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
1,480 | 1,480 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock to noncontrolling interest in RHB
|
41 | 1 | 999 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Excess fair value over book value of minority interest in RHB
|
(5,415 | ) | (5,415 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
13,007 | 130 | 147,786 | (9,304 | ) | 138,612 | ||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
18,066 | 18,066 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued upon option and warrant exercises
|
154 | 1 | 237 | 238 | ||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense
|
210 | 210 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance and amortization of restricted stock
|
24 | | 307 | 307 | ||||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
1,218 | 1,218 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revaluation of noncontrolling interest put liability
|
607 | 607 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expenditures related to 2007 equity offering
|
(142 | ) | (142 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
13,185 | $ | 131 | $ | 150,223 | $ | 8,762 | $ | 159,116 | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated
financial statement
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities
|
||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
$ | 18,066 | $ | 14,444 | $ | 13,320 | ||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in earnings
of subsidiary
|
908 | 62 | | |||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations
|
| | (682 | ) | ||||||||
Net income from continuing operations
|
18,974 | 14,506 | 12,638 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to
net cash provided by continuing operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
13,168 | 9,544 | 7,011 | |||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment
|
81 | (501 | ) | (276 | ) | |||||||
Deferred tax expense
|
8,938 | 6,600 | 6,256 | |||||||||
Stock based compensation expense
|
517 | 1,110 | 1,108 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
(1,218 | ) | (1,480 | ) | | |||||||
Interest expense accreted on noncontrolling interest
|
199 | | | |||||||||
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
(Increase) in contracts receivable
|
(6,188 | ) | (6,588 | ) | (7,893 | ) | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts
|
(3,761 | ) | 648 | (958 | ) | |||||||
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(1,945 | ) | (629 | ) | (1,011 | ) | ||||||
(Decrease) increase in trade payables
|
(1,079 | ) | 6,064 | (3,043 | ) | |||||||
(Decrease) increase in billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts
|
(2,222 | ) | 646 | 7,901 | ||||||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued compensation and other liabilities
|
1,257 | (378 | ) | 1,356 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by continuing operations operating activities
|
26,721 | 29,542 | 23,089 | |||||||||
Cash flows from continuing operations investing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Cash paid for business combinations, net of cash acquired
|
| (49,334 | ) | (2,206 | ) | |||||||
Additions to property and equipment
|
(19,896 | ) | (26,319 | ) | (24,849 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
1,298 | 1,603 | 866 | |||||||||
Purchases of short-term securities, available for sale
|
(24,325 | ) | (123,797 | ) | (144,192 | ) | ||||||
Sales of short-term securities, available for sale
|
| 149,912 | 118,023 | |||||||||
Net cash used in continuing operations investing activities
|
(42,923 | ) | (47,935 | ) | (52,358 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from continuing operations financing activities:
|
||||||||||||
Cumulative daily drawdowns Credit Facility
|
235,000 | 190,199 | 106,025 | |||||||||
Cumulative daily reductions Credit Facility
|
(245,000 | ) | (155,199 | ) | (89,813 | ) | ||||||
Repayments under related party long term debt
|
| | (8,449 | ) | ||||||||
Repayments under long-term obligations
|
(98 | ) | (129 | ) | (123 | ) | ||||||
Increase in deferred loan costs
|
| (1,197 | ) | (124 | ) | |||||||
Issuance of common stock pursuant to warrants and options
exercised
|
238 | 513 | 913 | |||||||||
Utilization of excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options
|
1,218 | 1,480 | | |||||||||
Distributions to RHB minority interest owner
|
(562 | ) | | | ||||||||
Payments on note receivable
|
204 | 420 | | |||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of common stock
|
(142 | ) | 34,489 | 27,039 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations financing
activities
|
(9,142 | ) | 70,576 | 35,468 | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents from
continuing operations
|
(25,344 | ) | 52,183 | 6,199 | ||||||||
Cash provided by discontinued operations
|
| | 495 | |||||||||
Cash used in discontinued investing activities
|
| | 4,739 | |||||||||
Cash used in discontinued operations financing activities
|
| | (5,357 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
| | (123 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
80,649 | 28,466 | 22,267 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 55,305 | $ | 80,649 | $ | 28,466 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest, net of $107, $53 and
$14 of capitalized interest expense in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively
|
$ | 167 | $ | 216 | $ | 199 | ||||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
|
$ | 3,000 | $ | 1,300 | $ | 300 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
STERLING
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis
of Presentation:
Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (Sterling or
the Company) a Delaware Corporation, is a leading
heavy civil construction company that specializes in the
building, reconstruction and repair of transportation and water
infrastructure in large and growing markets in Texas and Nevada.
Our transportation infrastructure projects include highways,
roads, bridges and light rail, and our water infrastructure
projects include water, wastewater and storm drainage systems.
We provide general contracting services primarily to public
sector clients utilizing our own employees and equipment for
activities including excavating, paving, pipe installation and
concrete and asphalt placement. We purchase the necessary
materials for our contracts, perform approximately
three-quarters of the work required by our contracts with our
own crews, and generally engage subcontractors only for
ancillary services.
Sterling owns four subsidiaries; Texas Sterling Construction Co.
(TSC), a Delaware corporation, Road and Highway
Builders, LLC (RHB), a Nevada limited liability
company, Road and Highway Builders, Inc. (RHB Inc),
a Nevada corporation and Road and Highway Builders of
California, Inc., (RHB Cal). TSC, RHB and RHB Cal
perform construction contracts and RHB Inc produces aggregates
from a leased quarry.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of subsidiaries in which the Company has a greater than
50% ownership interest and all significant intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. For all
years presented, the Company had no subsidiaries with ownership
interests of less than 50%.
Organization
and Business:
Although we describe our business in this report in terms of the
services we provide, our base of customers and the geographic
areas in which we operate, we have concluded that our operations
comprise one reportable segment pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 131
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information. In making this determination, we considered that
each project has similar characteristics, includes similar
services, has similar types of customers and is subject to
similar economic and regulatory environments. We organize,
evaluate and manage our financial information around each
project when making operating decisions and assessing our
overall performance.
Use of
Estimates:
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, which require management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the
reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain of the Companys accounting policies require higher
degrees of judgment than others in their application. These
include the recognition of revenue and earnings from
construction contracts under the percentage of completion
method, the valuation of long-term assets, and income taxes.
Management evaluates all of its estimates and judgments on an
on-going basis.
Revenue
Recognition:
Construction
The Companys primary business since July 2001 has been as
a general contractor in the States of Texas and, with the
acquisition of RHB, Nevada where it engages in various types of
heavy civil construction projects principally for public
(government) owners. Credit risk is minimal with public owners
since the
Company ascertains that funds have been appropriated by the
governmental project owner prior to commencing work on such
projects. While most public contracts are subject to termination
at the election of the government entity, in the event of
termination the Company is entitled to receive the contract
price for completed work and reimbursement of
termination-related costs. Credit risk with private owners is
minimized because of statutory mechanics liens, which give the
Company high priority in the event of lien foreclosures
following financial difficulties of private owners.
Revenues are recognized on the
percentage-of-completion
method, measured by the ratio of costs incurred up to a given
date to estimated total costs for each contract.
Contract costs include all direct material, labor, subcontract
and other costs and those indirect costs related to contract
performance, such as indirect salaries and wages, equipment
repairs and depreciation, insurance and payroll taxes.
Administrative and general expenses are charged to expense as
incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted
contracts are made in the period in which such losses are
determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions and
estimated profitability, including those changes arising from
contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements may
result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in
the period in which the revisions are determined. An amount
attributable to contract claims is included in revenues when
realization is probable and the amount can be reliably
estimated. Cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings
included $0.2 million and $0.5 million at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, for contract
claims not approved by the customer (which includes
out-of-scope
work, potential or actual disputes, and claims). The Company
generally provides a one-year warranty for workmanship under its
contracts. Warranty claims historically have been insignificant.
The asset, Costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts represents revenues
recognized in excess of amounts billed on these contracts. The
liability Billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts represents billings in
excess of revenues recognized on these contracts.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments:
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with
original or remaining maturities of three months or less at the
time of purchase to be cash equivalents. At December 31,
2008, all cash and cash equivalents were fully insured by the
FDIC under its Transaction Account Guarantee Program. At
December 31, 2008 there were uninsured short-term
investments of $13.1 million.
The Company classified investments in U.S. treasury bills
of $5.0 million at December 31, 2008, as securities
available for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities. At December 31, 2008 we had certificates
of deposits of $19.4 million with original maturities of
greater than 90 days, but less than one year which were
included along with the treasury bills in short-term
investments. There was no material unrealized gain or loss on
these securities at December 31, 2008, as the market value
of these securities approximated their cost.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the
Company recorded interest income of $1.1 million,
$1.7 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
Contracts
Receivable:
Contracts receivable are generally based on amounts billed to
the customer. At December 31, 2008, contracts receivable
included retainage of $25.9 million discussed below which
is being withheld by customers until completion of the contracts
and $2.1 million of unbilled receivables on contracts
completed or substantially complete at that date (the latter
amount is expected to be billed in 2009). All other contracts
receivable include only balances approved for payment by the
customer. Based upon a review of outstanding contracts
receivable, historical collection information and existing
economic conditions, management has determined that all
contracts receivable at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are
fully collectible, and accordingly, no allowance for doubtful
accounts against contracts receivable is necessary. Contracts
receivable are written
off based on individual credit evaluation and specific
circumstances of the customer, when such treatment is warranted.
Retainage:
Many of the contracts under which the Company performs work
contain retainage provisions. Retainage refers to that portion
of billings made by the Company but held for payment by the
customer pending satisfactory completion of the project. Unless
reserved, the Company assumes that all amounts retained by
customers under such provisions are fully collectible. Retainage
on active contracts is classified as a current asset regardless
of the term of the contract and is generally collected within
one year of the completion of a contract. Retainage was
approximately $25.9 million and $21.1 million at
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively,
of which $0.2 million at December 31, 2008 is expected
to be collected beyond 2009.
Inventories:
The Companys inventories are stated at the lower of cost
or market as determined by the average cost method. Inventories
at December 31, 2008 and 2007 consist primarily of raw
materials, such as concrete and millings which are expected to
be utilized on construction projects in the future. The cost of
inventory includes labor, trucking and other equipment costs.
Property
and Equipment:
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and
amortization are computed using the straight-line method. The
estimated useful lives used for computing depreciation and
amortization are as follows:
Building
|
39 years | |
Construction equipment
|
5-15 years | |
Land improvements
|
5-15 years | |
Office furniture and fixtures
|
3-10 years | |
Transportation equipment
|
5 years |
Depreciation expense was approximately $12.9 million,
$9.5 million, and $6.9 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Equipment
under Capital Leases:
The Companys policy is to account for capital leases,
which transfer substantially all the benefits and risks incident
to the ownership of the leased property to the Company, as the
acquisition of an asset and the incurrence of an obligation.
Under this method of accounting, the recorded value of the
leased asset is amortized principally using the straight-line
method over its estimated useful life and the obligation,
including interest thereon, is reduced through payments over the
life of the lease. Depreciation expense on leased equipment and
the related accumulated depreciation is included with that of
owned equipment.
Deferred
Loan Costs:
Deferred loan costs represent loan origination fees paid to the
lender and related professional fees such as legal fees related
to drafting of loan agreements. These fees are amortized over
the term of the loan. In 2007, the Company entered into a new
syndicated term Credit Facility (see Note 4) and
incurred $1.3 million of loan costs, which are being
amortized over the five-year term of the loan. In 2006, TSC
renewed its line of credit and incurred loan costs in the amount
of $123,000, which were being amortized over the three year term
of the Credit Facility; however, the unamortized loan costs were
charged to expense in 2007 with the execution of a new line of
credit. Loan cost amortization expense for fiscal years 2008,
2007 and 2006 was $254,000, $76,000 and $99,000, respectively.
Goodwill
and Intangibles:
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of companies acquired
over the fair value of their net assets at the dates of
acquisition.
The Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). SFAS 142
requires that: (1) goodwill and indefinite lived intangible
assets not be amortized, (2) goodwill is to be tested for
impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level,
(3) the amortization period of intangible assets with
finite lives is to be no longer limited to forty years, and
(4) intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite life are
to be tested for impairment at least annually by comparing the
fair value of these assets with their recorded amounts.
Goodwill impairment is tested during the last quarter of each
calendar year. The first step compares the book value of the
Companys stock to the fair market value of those shares as
reported by Nasdaq. If the fair market value of the stock is
greater than the calculated book value of the stock, goodwill is
deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is required. If
the fair market value is less than the calculated book value,
additional steps of determining fair value of additional assets
must be taken to determine impairment. Testing step one in 2008
indicated the fair market value of the Companys stock was
in excess of its book value and no further testing was required;
based on the results of such test for impairment, the Company
concluded that no impairment of goodwill existed as of
December 31, 2008.
Intangible assets that have finite lives continue to be subject
to amortization. In addition, the Company must evaluate the
remaining useful life in each reporting period to determine
whether events and circumstances warrant a revision of the
remaining period of amortization. If the estimate of an
intangible assets remaining life is changed, the remaining
carrying amount of such asset is amortized prospectively over
that revised remaining useful life.
Evaluating
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:
When events or changes in circumstances indicate that long-lived
assets other than goodwill may be impaired, an evaluation is
performed. The estimated undiscounted cash flow associated with
the asset is compared to the assets carrying amount to
determine if a write-down to fair value is required.
Federal
and State Income Taxes:
We determine deferred income tax assets and liabilities using
the balance sheet method, as clarified by FIN 48. Under
this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is
determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences
between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet
assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes
in tax rates and laws. Valuation allowances are established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected
to be realized. FIN 48 requires that we recognize the
financial statement benefit of a tax position only after
determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely
than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax
positions meeting the more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount
recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit
that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax
authority (see Note 6).
Stock-Based
Compensation:
The Company has five stock-based incentive plans which are
administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. Prior to August 2006, the Company used the closing
price of its common stock on the trading day immediately
preceding the date the option was approved as the grant date
market value. Since July 2006, the Companys policy has
been to use the closing price of the common stock on the date of
the meeting at which a stock option award is approved for the
options per-share exercise price. The term of the grants
under the plans do not exceed 10 years. Stock options
generally vest over a three to five year period and the fair
value of the stock option is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the vesting period of the option. Refer to Note 8 for
further information regarding the stock-based incentive plans.
Net
Income Per Share:
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common
share is the same as basic net income per share but assumes the
exercise of any convertible subordinated debt securities and
includes dilutive stock options and warrants using the treasury
stock method. The following table reconciles the numerators and
denominators of the basic and diluted per common share
computations for net income for 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in
thousands, except per share data):
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Numerator:
|
||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
$ | 18,066 | $ | 14,444 | $ | 13,320 | ||||||
Denominator:
|
||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
13,120 | 11,044 | 10,583 | |||||||||
Shares for dilutive stock options and warrants
|
582 | 792 | 1,131 | |||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding and assumed
conversions diluted
|
13,702 | 11,836 | 11,714 | |||||||||
Basic net income per share
|
$ | 1.38 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 1.25 | ||||||
Diluted net income per share
|
$ | 1.32 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 1.14 | ||||||
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, there
were 96,007, 79,700 and 81,500 options, respectively, considered
antidilutive as the option exercise price exceeded the average
share market price.
Interest
Costs
Approximately $107,000, $53,000 and $14,000 of interest related
to the construction of maintenance facilities and an office
building were capitalized as part of construction costs during
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, in accordance with
SFAS No. 34 Capitalization of Interest
Cost.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements:
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)). This Statement establishes principles and
requirements for how the acquirer: (a) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling
interest in the acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase and (c) determines what information to
disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
Also, under SFAS 141(R), all direct costs of the business
combination must be charged to expense on the financial
statements of the acquirer as incurred. SFAS 141(R) revises
previous guidance as to the recording of post-combination
restructuring plan costs by requiring the acquirer to record
such costs separately from the business combination. This
statement is effective for acquisitions occurring on or after
January 1, 2009, with early adoption not permitted. Unless
the Company enters into another business combination, there will
be no effect on future financial statements of SFAS 141(R)
when adopted.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157) which establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and requires expanded
disclosure about the information used to measure fair value. The
statement applies whenever other statements require or permit
assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, and does not
expand the use of fair value accounting in any new
circumstances. In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective
date by which companies must adopt the provisions of
SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except
for items that are recognized or disclosed in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The new
effective date of SFAS 157 deferred implementation to
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this
standard is not anticipated to have a material impact on our
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an amendment to FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS No. 159). This
statement allows a company to irrevocably elect fair value as a
measurement attribute for certain financial assets and financial
liabilities with changes in fair value recognized in the results
of operations. SFAS No. 159 also establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate
comparisons between companies that choose different measurement
attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities.
SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. Adoption of this FASB did not have
a material impact on the Companys results of operations
and financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 160, Non-controlling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 clarifies previous guidance on
how consolidated entities should account for and report
non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiaries. The
statement standardizes the presentation of non-controlling
(minority interests) for both the consolidated
balance sheet and income statement. This Statement is effective
for the Company for fiscal years beginning on or after
January 1, 2009, and all interim periods within that fiscal
year, with early adoption not permitted. Upon adoption, the
noncontrolling interest in any subsequent acquisition that does not contain a put will be reported as a separate
component of stockholders equity instead of a liability
and net income will be segregated between net income
attributable to common stockholders and non-controlling
interests.
Reclassifications
Certain immaterial balances included in the prior year balance
sheet have been reclassified to conform to current year
presentation. The accompanying financial statements also contain certain reclassifications to conform with the requirements of SFAS 160 discussed above.
2. | Discontinued operations |
In 2005 management identified one of the Companys
subsidiaries, Steel City Products, LLC, (SCPL) as
held for sale and accordingly, reclassified its consolidated
financial statements for all periods to separately present SCPL
as discontinued operations.
On October 27, 2006, the Company sold the operations of
SCPL to an industry related buyer. The Company received proceeds
from the sale of $5.4 million. The Company reported a
pre-tax gain of $249,000 on the sale, equal to $121,000 after
taxes. Summarized financial information for discontinued
operations through the date of the sale on October 27, 2006
is presented below (in thousands):
2006 | ||||
Net sales
|
$ | 17,661 | ||
Income before income taxes
|
741 | |||
Income taxes
|
180 | |||
Gain on disposal, net of tax of $128
|
121 | |||
Net income from discontinued operations
|
$ | 682 | ||
3. | Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment are summarized as follows (in thousands):
December 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Construction equipment
|
$ | 96,002 | $ | 83,739 | ||||
Transportation equipment
|
12,358 | 9,279 | ||||||
Buildings
|
3,926 | 1,573 | ||||||
Office equipment
|
547 | 602 | ||||||
Construction in progress
|
792 | 856 | ||||||
Land
|
2,916 | 2,718 | ||||||
Water rights
|
200 | 200 | ||||||
116,741 | 98,967 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation
|
(38,748 | ) | (26,578 | ) | ||||
$ | 77,993 | $ | 72,389 | |||||
At December 31, 2008 construction in progress consisted of
expenditures for new maintenance shop facilities at various
locations in Texas.
4. | Line of Credit and Long-Term Debt |
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Credit Facility, due October 2012
|
$ | 55,000 | $ | 65,000 | ||||
Mortgages due monthly through June 2016
|
556 | 654 | ||||||
55,556 | 65,654 | |||||||
Less current maturities of long-term debt
|
(73 | ) | (98 | ) | ||||
$ | 55,483 | $ | 65,556 | |||||
Line
of Credit Facilities
On October 31, 2007, the Company and its subsidiaries
entered into a new credit facility (Credit Facility)
with Comerica Bank, which replaced a prior Revolver and will
mature on October 31, 2012. The Credit Facility allows for
borrowing of up to $75.0 million and is secured by all
assets of the Company, other than proceeds and other rights
under our construction contracts, which are pledged to our bond
surety. The Credit Facility requires the payment of a quarterly
commitment fee of 0.25% per annum of the unused portion of the
Credit Facility. Borrowings under the Credit Facility were used
to finance the RHB acquisition, repay indebtedness outstanding
under the Revolver, and finance working capital. At
December 31, 2008, the aggregate borrowings outstanding
under the Credit Facility were $55.0 million, and the
aggregate amount of letters of credit outstanding under the
Credit Facility was $1.8 million, which reduces
availability under the Credit Facility. Availability under the
Credit Facility was, therefore, $18.2 million at
December 31, 2008.
At our election, the loans under the Credit Facility bear
interest at either a LIBOR-based interest rate or a prime-based
interest rate. The unpaid principal balance of each prime-based
loan will bear interest at a variable rate equal to
Comericas prime rate plus an amount ranging from 0% to
0.50% depending on the pricing leverage ratio that we achieve.
The pricing leverage ratio is determined by the
ratio of our average total debt, less cash and cash equivalents,
to the EBITDA that we achieve on a rolling four-quarter basis.
The pricing leverage ratio is measured quarterly. If we achieve
a pricing leverage ratio of (a) less than 1.00 to 1.00;
(b) equal to or greater than 1.00 to 1.00 but less than
1.75 to 1.00; or (c) greater than or equal to 1.75 to 1.00,
then the applicable prime margins will be 0.0%, 0.25% or 0.50%,
respectively. The interest rate on funds
borrowed under this Credit Facility was 3.5% at
December 31, 2008, and during the year ended
December 31, 2008 ranged from 3.50% to 7.50%.
The unpaid principal balance of each LIBOR-based loan bears
interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus an amount
ranging from 1.25% to 2.25% depending on the pricing leverage
ratio that we achieve. If we achieve a pricing leverage ratio of
(a) less than 1.00 to 1.00; (b) equal to or greater
than 1.00 to 1.00 but less than 1.75 to 1.00; or
(c) greater than or equal to 1.75 to 1.00, then the
applicable LIBOR margins will be 1.25%, 1.75% or 2.25%,
respectively. Interest on LIBOR-based loans is payable at the
end of the relevant LIBOR interest period, which must be one,
two, three or six months.
The Credit Facility is subject to our compliance with certain
covenants, including financial covenants relating to fixed
charges, leverage, tangible net worth, asset coverage and
consolidated net losses. The Credit Facility contains
restrictions on the Companys ability to:
| Make distributions and dividends; | |
| Incur liens and encumbrances; | |
| Incur further indebtedness; | |
| Guarantee obligations; | |
| Dispose of a material portion of assets or merge with a third party; | |
| Make acquisitions; | |
| Incur negative income for two consecutive quarters. |
The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the
Credit Facility as of December 31, 2008.
In December 2007, Comerica syndicated the Credit Facility with
three other financial institutions under the same terms
discussed above.
Management believes that the Credit Facility will provide
adequate funding for the Companys working capital, debt
service and capital expenditure requirements, including seasonal
fluctuations at least through December 31, 2009.
The prior Revolver required the payment of a quarterly
commitment fee of 0.25% per annum of the unused portion of the
line of credit. Borrowing interest rates were based on the
banks prime rate or on a Eurodollar rate at the option of
the Company. The interest rate on funds borrowed under this
revolver during the year ended December 31, 2006 ranged
from 7.25% to 8.25% and during 2007 ranged from 7.75% to 8.25%.
Mortgage
In 2001 TSC completed the construction of a headquarters
building and financed it principally through a mortgage of
$1.1 million on the land and facilities, at a floating
interest rate, which at December 31, 2008 was 3.5% per
annum, repayable over 15 years. The aggregate outstanding
balance on these two mortgages aggregated $556,000 at
December 31, 2008.
Maturity
of Debt
The Companys long-term obligations mature in future years
as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Year
|
||||
2009
|
$ | 73 | ||
2010
|
73 | |||
2011
|
73 | |||
2012
|
55,073 | |||
2013
|
73 | |||
Thereafter
|
191 | |||
$ | 55,556 | |||
5. | Financial Instruments |
SFAS No. 107, Disclosure about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments defines the fair value of
financial instruments as the amount at which the instrument
could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing
parties.
The Companys financial instruments are cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, contracts receivable,
accounts payable, mortgages payable and long-term debt. The
recorded values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments, contracts receivable and accounts payable
approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature.
The recorded value of long-term debt approximates its fair
value, as interest approximates market rates.
TSC had one mortgage outstanding at December 31, 2008, and
two mortgages outstanding at December 31, 2007. The
mortgage outstanding at December 31, 2008 was accruing
interest at 3.50% at that date and contained pre-payment
penalties. To determine the fair value of the mortgage, the
amount of future cash flows was discounted using the
Companys borrowing rate on its Credit Facility. At
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the carrying
value of the mortgages was $556,000 and $654,000, respectively,
and the fair value of the mortgages was approximately $488,000
and $641,000, respectively.
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet financial
instruments.
6. | Income Taxes and Deferred Tax Asset/Liability |
During the year ended December 31, 2007, Sterling utilized
its book net operating tax loss carry-forwards (NOL)
of approximately $9.8 million to offset a portion of the
taxable income of the Company and its subsidiaries for federal
income tax return purposes.
The Company also had available carry-forwards resulting from the
exercise of non-qualified stock options. The Company could not
recognize the tax benefit of these carry-forwards as deferred
tax assets until its existing NOLs were fully utilized,
and therefore, the deferred tax asset related to NOL
carry-forwards differed from the amount available on its federal
tax returns. The Company utilized approximately
$3.5 million and $4.2 million of these excess
compensation carry-forwards from the exercise of stock options
to offset taxable income in 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
utilization of these excess compensation benefits for tax
purposes reduced taxes payable and increased additional paid-in
capital for financial statement purposes by $1.2 million
and $1.5 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Current income tax expense represents federal tax payable for
2008 and Texas franchise tax.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities of continuing operations
consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2008 | December 31, 2007 | |||||||||||||||
Current | Long Term | Current | Long Term | |||||||||||||
Assets related to:
|
||||||||||||||||
Accrued compensation
|
$ | 1,169 | $ | | $ | 1,054 | $ | 487 | ||||||||
AMT carry forward
|
| 1,770 | | 2,446 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
34 | 128 | 37 | | ||||||||||||
Liabilities related to:
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortization of goodwill
|
| (1,209 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation of property and equipment
|
| (11,806 | ) | | (6,031 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
| | (3 | ) | | |||||||||||
Net asset/liability
|
$ | 1,203 | $ | (11,117 | ) | $ | 1,088 | $ | (3,098 | ) | ||||||
The income tax provision differs from the amount using the
statutory federal income tax rate of 35% in 2008 and 2007 and
34% in 2006 applied to income from continuing operations, for
the following reasons (in thousands):
Fiscal Year Ended | ||||||||||||
December 31, |
December 31, |
December 31, |
||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||
Tax expense at the U.S. federal statutory rate
|
$ | 10,149 | $ | 7,838 | $ | 6,721 | ||||||
Texas franchise tax expense, net of refunds and federal benefits
|
195 | 106 | | |||||||||
Taxes on subsidiarys earnings allocated to minority
interest
|
(319 | ) | | | ||||||||
Non-taxable interest income
|
(35 | ) | (295 | ) | | |||||||
Permanent differences
|
35 | 241 | 153 | |||||||||
Income tax expense
|
$ | 10,025 | $ | 7,890 | $ | 6,874 | ||||||
Income tax on discontinued operations including taxes on the
gain on sale in 2006
|
| | 308 | |||||||||
Income tax on continuing operations
|
$ | 10,025 | $ | 7,890 | $ | 6,566 | ||||||
The decrease in the effective income tax rate to 34.6% in 2008
from 35.2% in 2007 is due to the increase in the portion of
earnings of a subsidiary taxed to the minority interest owner
partially offset by a full year of the revised Texas franchise
tax which became effective July 1, 2007. The increase in
the effective income tax rate to 35.2% in 2007 from 34.2% in
2006 is the result of the Texas franchise tax and an increase in
the statutory tax rate.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the
United States federal jurisdiction and in various states. With
few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to federal tax
examinations for years prior to 2002 and state income tax
examinations for years prior to 2005. The Companys policy
is to recognize interest related to any underpayment of taxes as
interest expense, and penalties as administrative expenses. No
interest or penalties have been accrued at December 31,
2008.
The Company adopted FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes on January 1, 2007;
however the adoption did not result in an adjustment to retained
earnings. In its 2005 tax return, the Company used NOLs
that would have expired during that year instead of deducting
compensation expense that originated in 2005 as the result of
stock option exercises. Therefore, that compensation deduction
was lost. Whether the Company can choose not to take deductions
for compensation expense in the tax return and to instead use
otherwise expiring NOLs is considered by management to be an
uncertain tax position. In the event that the IRS examines the
2005 tax return and determines that the compensation expense is
a required deduction in the tax return, then the Company would
deduct the compensation expense instead of the NOL used in the
period; however there would be no cash impact on tax paid due to
the increased compensation deduction. In addition, there would
be no interest or penalties due as a result of the change. As a
result of the Companys detailed FIN 48 analysis,
management has determined that it is more likely than not this
position will be sustained upon examination, and this uncertain
tax position was determined to have a measurement of $0.
The Company does not believe that its uncertain tax position
will significantly change due to the settlement and expiration
of statutes of limitations prior to December 31, 2009.
7. | Costs and Estimated Earnings and Billings on Uncompleted Contracts |
Costs and estimated earnings and billings on uncompleted
contracts at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows (in
thousands):
Fiscal Year Ended |
Fiscal Year Ended |
|||||||
December 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Costs incurred and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
|
$ | 584,997 | $ | 329,559 | ||||
Billings on uncompleted contracts
|
(600,616 | ) | (351,161 | ) | ||||
$ | (15,619 | ) | $ | (21,602 | ) | |||
Included in accompanying balance sheets under the following
captions:
Fiscal Year Ended |
Fiscal Year Ended |
|||||||
December 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
$ | 7,508 | $ | 3,747 | ||||
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
(23,127 | ) | (25,349 | ) | ||||
$ | (15,619 | ) | $ | (21,602 | ) | |||
8. | Stock Options and Warrants |
Stock
Options and Grants
In July 2001, the Board of Directors adopted and in October
2001 shareholders approved the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan
(the 2001 Plan). The 2001 Plan initially provided
for the issuance of stock awards for up to 500,000 shares
of the Companys common stock. In March 2006, the number of
shares available for issuance under the 2001 Plan was increased
to one million shares. In November 2007, the number of shares
available for issuance under the 2001 Plan was reduced by the
board of directors from one million shares to
662,626 shares and subsequently in May 2008 was returned to
one million shares. The plan is administered by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors. In general, the plan
provides for all grants to be issued with a per-share exercise
price equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock
on the date of grant. The original terms of the grants typically
do not exceed 10 years. Stock options generally vest over a
three to five year period.
The Companys and its subsidiaries directors,
officers, employees, consultants and advisors are eligible to be
granted awards under the 2001 plan.
At December 31, 2008 there were 397,690 shares of
common stock available under the 2001 Plan for issuance pursuant
to future stock option and share grants. No options are
outstanding and no shares are or will be available for grant
under the Companys other option plans, all of which have
been terminated.
The 2001 plan provides for restricted stock grants and in May
2008 and May 2007, pursuant to non-employee director
compensation arrangements. Non-employee directors of the Company
were awarded restricted stock with one-year vesting as follows:
2008 Awards | 2007 Awards | |||||||
Shares awarded to each non-employee directors
|
2,564 | 1,598 | ||||||
Total shares awarded
|
17,948 | 9,588 | ||||||
Grant-date market price per share of awarded shares
|
$ | 19.50 | $ | 21.90 | ||||
Total compensation cost
|
$ | 350,000 | $ | 210,000 | ||||
Compensation cost recognized in 2008
|
$ | 221,000 | $ | 140,000 |
In March 2008, five employees were granted an aggregate of
5,672 shares of restricted stock with a market value $18.16
per share resulting in compensation expense of $103,000 to be
recognized ratably over the five-year restriction period.
The following tables summarize the stock option activity under
the 2001 Plan and previously active plans:
1994 Non-Employee |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 Plan | Director Plan | 1991 Plan | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted |
Weighted |
Weighted |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Average |
Average |
Average |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | Shares | Exercise Price | Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005:
|
457,160 | $ | 4.66 | 31,166 | $ | 1.58 | 84,420 | $ | 2.75 | |||||||||||||||
Granted
|
81,500 | $ | 16.36 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(64,057 | ) | $ | 2.46 | (18,000 | ) | $ | 2.05 | (55,996 | ) | $ | 2.75 | ||||||||||||
Expired/forfeited
|
(4,400 | ) | $ | 7.83 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006:
|
470,203 | $ | 8.35 | 13,166 | $ | 0.94 | 28,424 | $ | 2.75 | |||||||||||||||
Granted
|
16,507 | $ | 19.43 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(24,110 | ) | $ | 3.39 | (3,000 | ) | $ | 1.00 | (28,424 | ) | $ | 2.75 | ||||||||||||
Expired/forfeited
|
(5,460 | ) | $ | 13.48 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2007:
|
457,140 | $ | 9.06 | 10,166 | $ | 0.93 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(45,940 | ) | $ | 2.81 | (10,166 | ) | $ | 0.93 | | | ||||||||||||||
Expired/forfeited
|
(200 | ) | $ | 25.21 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008:
|
411,000 | $ | 9.75 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
1994 Omnibus Plan | 1998 Plan | |||||||||||||||
Weighted |
Weighted |
|||||||||||||||
Average |
Average |
|||||||||||||||
Exercise |
Exercise |
|||||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Shares | Price | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005:
|
424,196 | $ | 1.40 | 229,125 | $ | 0.58 | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
(166,016 | ) | $ | 1.08 | (225,875 | ) | $ | 0.57 | ||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006:
|
258,180 | $ | 1.60 | 3,250 | $ | 1.00 | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
(181,990 | ) | $ | 1.91 | (3,250 | ) | $ | 1.00 | ||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2007:
|
76,190 | $ | 0.88 | | | |||||||||||
Exercised
|
(76,190 | ) | $ | 0.88 | | | ||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2008:
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2008:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average |
Weighted Average |
Weighted Average |
||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Price |
Number of |
Remaining Contractual Life |
Exercise Price per |
Number of |
Exercise Price per |
|||||||||||||||
per Share
|
Shares | (Years) | Share | Shares | Share | |||||||||||||||
$0.94 - $1.50
|
31,700 | 2.56 | $ | 1.50 | 31,700 | $ | 1.50 | |||||||||||||
$1.73 - $2.00
|
31,800 | 3.56 | $ | 1.73 | 31,800 | $ | 1.73 | |||||||||||||
$2.75 - $3.38
|
148,193 | 3.66 | $ | 3.09 | 135,533 | $ | 3.09 | |||||||||||||
$6.87
|
15,000 | 6.38 | $ | 6.87 | 15,000 | $ | 6.87 | |||||||||||||
$9.69
|
62,800 | 1.55 | $ | 9.69 | 62,800 | $ | 9.69 | |||||||||||||
$16.78
|
25,500 | 1.70 | $ | 16.78 | 15,100 | $ | 16.78 | |||||||||||||
$18.99
|
13,707 | 8.61 | $ | 18.99 | 4,569 | $ | 18.99 | |||||||||||||
$21.60
|
2,800 | 3.55 | $ | 21.60 | 2,800 | $ | 21.60 | |||||||||||||
$24.96
|
62,800 | 2.55 | $ | 24.96 | 62,800 | $ | 24.96 | |||||||||||||
$25.21
|
16,700 | 2.69 | $ | 25.21 | 6,920 | $ | 25.21 | |||||||||||||
411,000 | 3.18 | $ | 9.75 | 369,022 | $ | 9.15 | ||||||||||||||
Aggregate Intrinsic |
||||||||
Number of Shares | Value | |||||||
Total outstanding
in-the-money
options at 12/31/08
|
314,993 | $ | 4,137,416 | |||||
Total vested
in-the-money
options at 12/31/08
|
291,933 | $ | 3,923,872 | |||||
Total options exercised during 2008
|
132,296 | $ | 2,184,482 |
For unexercised options, aggregate intrinsic value represents
the total pretax intrinsic value (the difference between the
Companys closing stock price on December 31, 2008
($18.53) and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of
in-the-money
option shares) that would have been received by the option
holders had all option holders exercised their options on
December 31, 2008. For options exercised during 2008,
aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pretax intrinsic
value based on the Companys closing stock price on the day
of exercise.
Compensation expense for options granted during 2007 and 2006
were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
using the following assumptions in each year (no options were
granted during 2008):
Fiscal 2007 | Fiscal 2006 | |||||||
Average Risk free interest rate
|
4.7 | % | 4.9 | % | ||||
Average Expected volatility
|
70.7 | % | 76.3 | % | ||||
Average Expected life of option
|
3.0 years | 5.0 years | ||||||
Expected dividends
|
None | None |
The risk-free interest rate is based upon interest rates that
match the contractual terms of the stock option grants. The
expected volatility is based on historical observation and
recent price fluctuations. The expected life is based on
evaluations of historical and expected future employee exercise
behavior, which is not less than the vesting period of the
options. The Company does not currently pay dividends. The
weighted average fair value of stock options granted in 2007 and
2006 was $12.20 and $16.36, respectively.
Pre-tax deferred compensation expense for stock options and
restricted stock grants was $517,000 ($336,000 after tax effects
of 35.0%), $1,110,000 ($722,000 after tax effects of 35.0%), and
$1,108,000 ($729,000 after tax effects of 34.2%), in 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively. Proceeds received by the Company from
the exercise of options in 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $205,000,
$513,000 and $657,000, respectively. At December 31, 2008,
total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to
unvested stock options was approximately $336,000, which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
approximately 2.0 years.
Warrants
Warrants attached to zero coupon notes were issued to certain
members of TSC management and to certain stockholders in 2001.
These ten-year warrants to purchase shares of the Companys
common stock at $1.50 per share became exercisable
54 months from the July 2001 issue date, except that one
warrant covering 322,661 shares by amendment became
exercisable forty-two months from the issue date. The following
table shows the warrant shares outstanding and the proceeds that
have been received by the Company from exercises.
Companys |
Year-End |
|||||||||||
Proceeds of |
Warrant Share |
|||||||||||
Shares | Exercise | Balance | ||||||||||
Warrants outstanding on vest date
|
850,000 | | 850,000 | |||||||||
Warrants exercised in 2005
|
322,661 | $ | 483,991 | 527,339 | ||||||||
Warrants exercised in 2006
|
171,073 | $ | 256,610 | 356,266 | ||||||||
Warrants exercised in 2007
|
| | 356,266 | |||||||||
Warrants exercised in 2008
|
22,220 | $ | 33,330 | 334,046 |
9. | Employee Benefit Plan |
The Company and its subsidiaries maintain a defined contribution
profit-sharing plan covering substantially all non-union persons
employed by the Company and its subsidiaries, whereby employees
may contribute a percentage of compensation, limited to maximum
allowed amounts under the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan
provides for discretionary employer contributions, the level of
which, if any, may vary by subsidiary and is determined annually
by each companys board of directors. The Company made
aggregate matching contributions of $322,000, $353,000 and
$325,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
10. | Operating Leases |
The Company leases office space in the Dallas and
San Antonio areas of Texas and Reno, Nevada.
In 2006 and 2007, the Company entered into several long-term
operating leases for equipment with lease terms of approximately
three to five years. Certain of these leases allow the Company
to purchase the equipment on or before the end of the lease
term. If the Company does not purchase the equipment, it is
returned to the lessor. Two leases obligate the Company to pay a
guaranteed residual not to exceed 20% of the original equipment
cost. The Company is accruing the liability for both leases,
which is not expected to exceed $330,000 in the aggregate.
Minimum annual rentals for all operating leases having initial
non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows
(in thousands):
Fiscal Year
|
||||
2009
|
$ | 721 | ||
2010
|
721 | |||
2011
|
634 | |||
2012
|
70 | |||
2013
|
| |||
Thereafter
|
| |||
Total future minimum rental payments
|
$ | 2,146 | ||
Total rent expense for all operating leases amounted to
approximately $767,000, $1,068,000 and $995,000 in fiscal years
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
11. | Customers |
The following table shows contract revenues generated from the
Companys customers that accounted for more than 10% of
revenues (dollars in thousands):
December 31, |
December 31, |
December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Contract |
% of |
Contract |
% of |
Contract |
% of |
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | Revenues | Revenues | Revenues | Revenues | Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||
Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT)
|
$ | 162,041 | 39.2 | % | $ | 201,073 | 65.7 | % | $ | 166,333 | 67.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT)
|
$ | 88,159 | 21.3 | % | * | * | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
City of Houston (COH)
|
* | * | * | * | $ | 29,848 | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Harris County
|
* | * | * | * | * | * |
* | represents less than 10% of revenues |
At December 31, 2008, TXDOT ($22.1 million), City of
Houston ($10.2 million) and City of San Antonio
($7.5 million) owed balances greater than 10% of contracts
receivable.
12. | Equity Offerings |
In December 2007, the Company completed a public offering of
1.84 million shares of its common stock at $20.00 per
share. The Company received proceeds, net of underwriting
discounts and commissions, of approximately $35.0 million
($19.00 per share) and paid approximately $0.5 million in
related offering expenses. From the proceeds of the offering,
the Company repaid the portion of its Credit Facility that was
used in its acquisition of its interest in RHB. The remainder of
the offering proceeds was used for working capital purposes.
In January 2006, the Company completed a public offering of
approximately 2.0 million shares of its common stock at
$15.00 per share. The Company received proceeds, net of
underwriting commissions, of approximately $28.0 million
($13.95 per share) and paid approximately $907,000 in related
offering expenses. In addition, the Company received
approximately $484,000 in December 2005 from the exercise of
warrants and options to purchase 321,758 shares of Common
Stock, which were subsequently sold in 2006 by the option and
warrant holders in the offering. From the proceeds of the
offering, the Company repaid all its outstanding related party
promissory notes to officers, directors and former directors as
follows:
Total |
||||||||||||
Name
|
Principal | Interest | Payment | |||||||||
Patrick T. Manning
|
$ | 318,592 | 2,867 | $ | 321,459 | |||||||
James D. Manning
|
$ | 1,855,349 | 16,698 | $ | 1,872,047 | |||||||
Joseph P. Harper, Sr.
|
$ | 2,637,422 | 23,737 | $ | 2,661,159 | |||||||
Maarten D. Hemsley
|
$ | 181,205 | 1,631 | $ | 182,836 | |||||||
Robert M. Davies
|
$ | 452,909 | 4,076 | $ | 456,985 |
During 2006, the Company utilized a portion of the offering
proceeds to purchase additional construction equipment and to
repay borrowed funds.
13. | Minority interest in RHB: |
On October 31, 2007, the Company purchased a 91.67%
interest in Road and Highway Builders, LLC (RHB), a
Nevada limited liability company, and all of the outstanding
capital stock of Road and Highway Builders, Inc (RHB
Inc), then an inactive Nevada corporation. These entities
were affiliated through common ownership and have been included
in the Companys consolidated results since the date of
acquisition.
RHB is a heavy civil construction business located in Reno,
Nevada that builds roads, highways and bridges for local and
state agencies in Nevada. Its assets consist of construction
contracts, road and bridge construction and aggregate mining
machinery and equipment, and approximately 44.5 acres of
land with improvements. RHB Incs sole asset is its right
as a co-lessee with RHB under a long-term, royalty-based lease
of a Nevada quarry on which RHB can mine aggregates for use in
its own construction business and for sale to third parties.
During early 2008, RHB Inc began crushing stone for the
operations of RHB.
The Company paid an aggregate purchase price for its interest in
RHB of $53.0 million, consisting of $48.9 million in
cash, 40,702 unregistered shares of the Companys common
stock, which were valued at $1.0 million based on the
quoted market value of the Companys stock on the purchase
date, and $3.1 million in assumption of accounts payable to
RHB by one of the sellers. Additionally, the Company incurred
$1.1 million of direct costs related to the acquisition. We
acquired RHB for a number of reasons, including those listed
below:
a) Expansion into growing western U.S. infrastructure
construction markets;
b) Strong management team with a shared corporate culture;
c) Expansion of our service lines into aggregates and
asphalt paving materials;
d) Opportunities to extend our municipal and structural
capabilities into Nevada; and
e) RHBs strong financial results and expected
immediate accretion to our earnings and earnings per share.
Ten percent of the cash purchase price was placed in escrow for
eighteen months as security for any breach of representations
and warranties made by the sellers.
The minority interest owner of RHB (who remains with RHB as
Chief Executive Officer) has the right to require the Company to
buy his remaining 8.33% minority interest in RHB and,
concurrently, the Company has the right to require that owner to
sell his 8.33% interest to the Company, beginning in 2011. The
purchase price in each case is 8.33% of the product of six times
the simple average of RHBs income before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization for the calendar years 2008, 2009
and 2010. The minority interest was recorded at its estimated
fair value of $6.3 million at the date of acquisition and
the difference of $5.4 million between the minority
owners interest in the historical basis of RHB and the
estimated fair value of that interest was recorded as a
liability to the minority interest and a reduction in addition
paid-in capital.
Any changes to the estimated fair value of the minority interest
will be recorded as a corresponding change in additional
paid-in-capital.
Additionally, interest will be accredited to the minority
interest liability based on the discount rate used to calculate
the fair value of the acquisition.
Based on RHBs operating results for 2008 and
managements current estimates of such results for 2009 and
2010, the Company has revised its estimate of the fair value of
the minority interest at December 31, 2008 and recorded a
reduction in the related liability and increased
paid-in-capital
by $607,000 at that date. This change in fair value estimate
also resulted in a reduction in interest accreted in the first
three quarters of 2008 on the liability by $228,000, which is
reflected as a reduction in fourth quarter interest expense.
The purchase agreement restricts the sellers from competing
against the business of RHB and from soliciting its employees
for a period of four years after the closing of the purchase.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase
price, including related direct acquisition costs for RHB (in
thousands):
Tangible assets acquired at estimated fair value, including
approximately $10,000 of property, plant and equipment
|
$ | 19,334 | ||
Current liabilities assumed
|
(9,686 | ) | ||
Goodwill
|
44,496 | |||
Total
|
$ | 54,144 | ||
The goodwill is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years.
The purchase price allocation has been finalized and there were
no separately identifiable assets, other than goodwill. Other
than the adjustment to the minority interest liability and
additional
paid-in-capital
discussed above, no material adjustments were made to the
initial allocation of the purchase price.
The operations of RHB are included in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the two
months ended December 31, 2007 and the year of 2008.
Supplemental information on an unaudited pro forma combined
basis, as if the RHB acquisition had been consummated at the
beginning of 2006, is as follow (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 377,740 | $ | 286,511 | ||||
Net income from continuing operations
|
$ | 26,881 | $ | 14,959 | ||||
Diluted net income per share from continuing operations
|
$ | 2.26 | $ | 1.27 |
For the ten months ended October 31, 2007, RHB had
unaudited revenues of approximately $72 million and
unaudited income before taxes of approximately $21 million.
The profitability of RHB for the ten month period was higher
than what was expected to continue due to some unusually high
margin contracts and may not be indicative of future results of
operations.
14. | Commitments and Contingencies |
Employment
Agreements
Patrick T. Manning, Joseph P. Harper, Sr., James H.
Allen, Jr. and certain other officers of the Company and
its subsidiaries have employment agreements which provide for
payments of annual salary, deferred salary, incentive bonuses
and certain benefits if their employment is terminated without
cause.
Self-Insurance
The Company is self-insured for employee health claims. Its
policy is to accrue the estimated liability for known claims and
for estimated claims that have been incurred but not reported as
of each reporting date. The Company has obtained reinsurance
coverage for the policy period as follows:
| Specific excess reinsurance coverage for medical and prescription drug claims in excess of $60,000 for each insured person with a maximum lifetime reimbursable of $2,000,000. | |
| Aggregate reinsurance coverage for medical and prescription drug claims within a plan year with a maximum of approximately $1.1 million which is the estimated maximum claims and fixed cost based on the number of employees. |
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, the Company incurred $1.5 million, $1.6 million
and $1.2 million, respectively, in expenses related to this
plan.
The Company is also self-insured for workers compensation
claims up to $250,000 per occurrence, with a maximum aggregate
liability of $2.7 million per year. Its policy is to accrue
the estimated liability for known claims and for estimated
claims that have been incurred but not reported as of each
reporting date. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company
had recorded an estimated liability of $1,092,000 and
$1,067,000, respectively, which it believes is adequate based on
its claims history and an actuarial study. The Company has a
safety and training program in place to help prevent accidents
and injuries and works closely with its employees and the
insurance company to monitor all claims.
The Company obtains bonding on construction contracts through
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America. As is
customary in the construction industry, the Company indemnifies
Travelers for any losses incurred by it in connection with bonds
that are issued. The Company has granted Travelers a security
interest in accounts receivable and contract rights for that
obligation.
Guarantees
The Company typically indemnifies contract owners for claims
arising during the construction process and carries insurance
coverage for such claims, which in the past have not been
material.
The Companys Certificate of Incorporation provides for
indemnification of its officers and directors. The Company has a
Director and Officer insurance policy that limits its exposure.
At December 31, 2008 the Company had not accrued a
liability for this guarantee, as the likelihood of incurring a
payment obligation in connection with this guarantee is believed
to be remote.
Litigation
The Company is the subject of certain claims and lawsuits
occurring in the normal course of business. Management, after
consultation with outside legal counsel, does not believe that
the outcome of these actions will have a material impact on the
financial statements of the Company.
Purchase
Commitments
To manage the risk of changes in material prices and
subcontracting costs used in tendering bids for construction
contracts, we obtain firm quotations from suppliers and
subcontractors before submitting a bid. These quotations do not
include any quantity guarantees. As soon as we are advised that
our bid is the lowest, we enter into firm contracts with most of
our materials suppliers and
sub-contractors,
thereby mitigating the risk of future price variations affecting
the contract costs.
15. | Related Party Transactions |
In July 2001, Robert Frickel was elected to the Board of
Directors. He is President of R.W. Frickel Company, P.C.,
an accounting firm that performs certain tax services for the
Company. Fees paid or accrued to R.W. Frickel Company for 2008,
2007 and 2006 and were approximately $39,700, $63,600 and
$57,500, respectively.
In July 2005, Patrick T. Manning married the sole beneficial
owner of Paradigm Outdoor Supply, LLC and Paradigm Outsourcing,
Inc., both of which are women-owned business enterprises. The
Paradigm companies provide materials and services to the Company
and to other contractors. In 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company
paid approximately $0.4 million, $1.7 million and
$3.3 million, respectively, to the Paradigm companies for
materials and services.
16. | Capital Structure |
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share
on all matters voted upon by the stockholders, including the
election of directors, and do not have cumulative voting rights.
Subject to the rights of holders of any then outstanding shares
of preferred stock, common stockholders are entitled to receive
ratably any dividends that may be declared by the Board of
Directors out of funds legally available for that purpose.
Holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in net
assets upon any dissolution or liquidation after payment of
provision for all liabilities and any preferential liquidation
rights of our preferred stock then outstanding. Common stock
shares are not subject to any redemption provisions and are not
convertible into any other shares of capital stock. The rights,
preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are
subject to those of the holders of any shares of preferred stock
that may be issued in the future.
The Board of Directors may authorize the issuance of one or more
classes or series of preferred stock without stockholder
approval and may establish the voting powers, designations,
preferences and rights and restrictions of such shares. No
preferred shares have been issued.
In December 1998, the Company entered into a rights agreement
with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as
rights agent, providing for a dividend of one purchase right for
each outstanding share of common stock for stockholders of
record on December 29, 1998. Holders of shares of common
stock issued since that date were issued rights with their
shares. The rights traded automatically with the shares of
common
stock and became exercisable only if a takeover attempt of the
Company had occurred. The rights expired on December 29,
2008.
17. | Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) |
Fiscal 2008 Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 (*) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 84,926 | $ | 106,728 | $ | 114,148 | $ | 109,272 | $ | 415,074 | ||||||||||
Gross profit
|
8,101 | 11,740 | 12,572 | 9,559 | 41,972 | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
4,800 | 8,278 | 9,591 | 6,330 | 28,999 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
$ | 3,117 | $ | 5,140 | $ | 5,978 | $ | 3,831 | $ | 18,066 | ||||||||||
Net income per share attributable to Sterling common stockholders, basic:
|
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 1.38 | ||||||||||
Net income per share attributable to Sterling common stockholders, diluted:
|
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 1.32 | ||||||||||
Fiscal 2007 Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 68,888 | $ | 71,275 | $ | 77,714 | $ | 88,343 | $ | 306,220 | ||||||||||
Gross profit
|
5,632 | 8,046 | 7,915 | 12,093 | 33,686 | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes and minority interest
|
3,806 | 5,711 | 5,125 | 7,754 | 22,396 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Sterling common stockholders
|
$ | 2,511 | $ | 3,797 | $ | 3,443 | $ | 4,693 | $ | 14,444 | ||||||||||
Net income per share attributable to Sterling common stockholders, basic:
|
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 1.31 | ||||||||||
Net income per share attributable to Sterling common stockholders, diluted:
|
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 1.22 | ||||||||||
* | See Note 13 regarding reversal in the fourth quarter of $228,000 of interest expense accreted on the minority interest liability in the first three quarters of 2008. |
18. | Subsequent Event |
On December 3, 2009, the Company acquired an 80 percent membership interest in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC (RLW) for $64.7 million. RLW is a heavy civil construction company focused on the design and construction of bridges, roads and highways, primarily in the state of Utah. Each of the sellers, who own the remaining 20 percent interest, has the right to put, or require the Company to buy, his
remaining membership interest in RLW and, concurrently, the Company has the right to acquire each remaining
membership interest in 2013. Supplemental information on an audited pro forma combined basis, as if the acquisition had been consummated at the beginning of 2008, is as follows (in thousands):
12 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||||||
December 31, 2008 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||
Revenues |
$ | 541,196 | $ | 431,427 | ||||
Net income
attributable to Sterling common stockholders |
$ | 28,054 | $ | 34,795 | ||||
Diluted net
income per share attributable to Sterling common stockholders |
$ | 2.05 | $ | 2.53 |