Attached files

file filename
EX-32 - EX-32 - ASSOCIATED BANC-CORPc54543exv32.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - ASSOCIATED BANC-CORPc54543exv31w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - ASSOCIATED BANC-CORPc54543exv31w2.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number 0-5519 and 001-31343
Associated Banc-Corp
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Wisconsin   39-1098068
 
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (IRS employer identification No.)
     
1200 Hansen Road, Green Bay, Wisconsin   54304
 
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip code)
(920) 491-7000
 
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
 
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
The number of shares outstanding of registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at October 31, 2009, was 127,867,775.
 
 

 


 

ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page No.
       
 
       
       
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    7  
 
       
    39  
 
       
    70  
 
       
    70  
 
       
       
 
       
    71  
 
       
    71  
 
       
    71  
 
       
    72  
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32

2


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements:
ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP
Consolidated Balance Sheets
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (Unaudited)     (Audited)  
    (In Thousands, except share data)  
ASSETS
               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 430,381     $ 533,338  
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
    13,145       12,649  
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
    17,000       24,741  
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value
    5,651,076       5,143,414  
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stocks, at cost
    181,316       206,003  
Loans held for sale
    78,740       87,084  
Loans
    14,765,597       16,283,908  
Allowance for loan losses
    (412,530 )     (265,378 )
     
Loans, net
    14,353,067       16,018,530  
Premises and equipment, net
    185,544       190,942  
Goodwill
    929,168       929,168  
Other intangible assets, net
    91,506       80,165  
Other assets
    950,584       966,033  
     
Total assets
  $ 22,881,527     $ 24,192,067  
     
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
  $ 2,984,486     $ 2,814,079  
Interest-bearing deposits, excluding brokered certificates of deposit
    12,808,533       11,551,181  
Brokered certificates of deposit
    653,090       789,536  
     
Total deposits
    16,446,109       15,154,796  
Short-term borrowings
    1,517,594       3,703,936  
Long-term funding
    1,761,506       1,861,647  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    231,659       595,185  
     
Total liabilities
    19,956,868       21,315,564  
 
               
Stockholders’ equity
               
Preferred equity
    510,315       508,008  
Common stock
    1,284       1,281  
Surplus
    1,080,720       1,073,218  
Retained earnings
    1,268,507       1,293,941  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    64,919       55  
Treasury stock, at cost
    (1,086 )      
     
Total stockholders’ equity
    2,924,659       2,876,503  
     
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 22,881,527     $ 24,192,067  
     
Preferred shares issued
    525,000       525,000  
Preferred shares authorized (par value $1.00 per share)
    750,000       750,000  
Common shares issued
    128,428,814       128,116,669  
Common shares authorized (par value $0.01 per share)
    250,000,000       250,000,000  
Treasury shares of common stock
    49,976        
          See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:
ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In Thousands, except per share data)  
INTEREST INCOME
                               
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 183,264     $ 229,001     $ 579,641     $ 721,781  
Interest and dividends on investment securities and deposits in other financial institutions:
                               
Taxable
    46,873       32,209       144,464       95,439  
Tax exempt
    8,498       9,887       26,811       29,922  
Interest on federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
    16       279       130       698  
     
Total interest income
    238,651       271,376       751,046       847,840  
INTEREST EXPENSE
                               
Interest on deposits
    37,811       61,743       129,403       206,904  
Interest on short-term borrowings
    2,895       23,958       13,137       76,494  
Interest on long-term funding
    18,709       19,158       60,854       60,076  
     
Total interest expense
    59,415       104,859       203,394       343,474  
     
NET INTEREST INCOME
    179,236       166,517       547,652       504,366  
Provision for loan losses
    95,410       55,011       355,856       137,014  
     
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    83,826       111,506       191,796       367,352  
NONINTEREST INCOME
                               
Trust service fees
    9,057       10,020       26,103       30,172  
Service charges on deposit accounts
    30,829       33,609       87,705       87,422  
Card-based and other nondeposit fees
    11,586       12,517       33,618       36,243  
Retail commission income
    15,041       14,928       45,382       47,047  
Mortgage banking, net
    (909 )     3,571       31,655       15,911  
Treasury management fees, net
    226       1,935       5,245       7,423  
Bank owned life insurance income
    3,789       5,235       12,722       15,093  
Asset sale gains (losses), net
    (126 )     573       (2,520 )     (614 )
Investment securities gains (losses), net:
                               
Realized gains (losses), net
    1,058             11,682       5  
Other-than-temporary impairments
    (2,575 )     (13,585 )     (3,988 )     (17,248 )
Less: Non-credit portion recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)
    1,475             1,475        
     
Total investment securities gains (losses), net
    (42 )     (13,585 )     9,169       (17,243 )
Other
    5,858       6,520       17,148       23,122  
     
Total noninterest income
    75,309       75,323       266,227       244,576  
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
                               
Personnel expense
    73,501       78,395       231,770       232,104  
Occupancy
    11,949       12,037       37,171       37,327  
Equipment
    4,575       5,088       13,834       14,338  
Data processing
    7,442       7,634       23,165       23,005  
Business development and advertising
    3,910       5,175       13,590       15,353  
Other intangible asset amortization expense
    1,386       1,568       4,157       4,705  
Legal and professional fees
    3,349       3,538       13,176       9,255  
Foreclosure/OREO expense
    8,688       2,427       27,277       6,969  
FDIC expense
    8,451       791       32,316       1,594  
Other
    17,860       19,924       55,950       64,060  
     
Total noninterest expense
    141,111       136,577       452,406       408,710  
     
Income before income taxes
    18,024       50,252       5,617       203,218  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    2,030       12,483       (35,761 )     51,625  
     
Net income
    15,994       37,769       41,378       151,593  
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion
    7,342             21,994        
     
Net income available to common equity
  $ 8,652     $ 37,769     $ 19,384     $ 151,593  
     
Earnings per common share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.07     $ 0.30     $ 0.15     $ 1.19  
Diluted
  $ 0.07     $ 0.30     $ 0.15     $ 1.18  
Average common shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    127,863       127,553       127,855       127,428  
Diluted
    127,863       127,622       127,859       127,799  
          See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:
ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
                                                         
                                    Accumulated              
                                    Other              
    Preferred     Common             Retained     Comprehensive     Treasury        
    Equity     Stock     Surplus     Earnings     Income (Loss)     Stock     Total  
    ($ in Thousands, except per share data)  
Balance, December 31, 2007
  $     $ 1,278     $ 1,040,694     $ 1,305,136     $ (2,498 )   $ (14,905 )   $ 2,329,705  
Adjustment for adoption of accounting standard related to split-dollar life insurance arrangements
                      (2,515 )                 (2,515 )
     
Balance, January 1, 2008, as adjusted
  $     $ 1,278     $ 1,040,694     $ 1,302,621     $ (2,498 )   $ (14,905 )   $ 2,327,190  
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net income
                      151,593                   151,593  
Other comprehensive income
                            (7,834 )           (7,834 )
 
                                                     
Comprehensive income
                                                    143,759  
 
                                                     
Cash dividends, $0.95 per share
                      (121,368 )                 (121,368 )
Common stock issued:
                                                       
Stock-based compensation plans, net
          2       4,045       (11,523 )           14,905       7,429  
Stock-based compensation, net
                5,235                         5,235  
Tax benefit of stock options
                2,002                         2,002  
     
Balance, September 30, 2008
  $     $ 1,280     $ 1,051,976     $ 1,321,323     $ (10,332 )   $     $ 2,364,247  
     
 
                                                       
Balance, December 31, 2008
  $ 508,008     $ 1,281     $ 1,073,218     $ 1,293,941     $ 55     $     $ 2,876,503  
April 1, 2009 adjustment for adoption of accounting standard related to other-than-temporary impairment
                      9,745       (9,745 )            
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net income
                      41,378                   41,378  
Other comprehensive income
                            74,609             74,609  
 
                                                     
Comprehensive income
                                                    115,987  
 
                                                     
Common stock issued:
                                                       
Stock-based compensation plans, net
          3       1,140       (632 )           (495 )     16  
Purchase of treasury stock
                                  (591 )     (591 )
Cash dividends:
                                                       
Common stock, $0.42 per share
                      (53,931 )                 (53,931 )
Preferred stock
                      (19,687 )                 (19,687 )
Accretion of preferred stock discount
    2,307                   (2,307 )                  
Stock-based compensation, net
                6,361                         6,361  
Tax benefit of stock options
                1                         1  
     
Balance, September 30, 2009
  $ 510,315     $ 1,284     $ 1,080,720     $ 1,268,507     $ 64,919     $ (1,086 )   $ 2,924,659  
     
          See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:
ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
                 
    For the Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2009     2008  
    ($ in Thousands)  
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
               
Net income
  $ 41,378     $ 151,593  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Provision for loan losses
    355,856       137,014  
Depreciation and amortization
    23,075       21,094  
Addition to (recovery of) valuation allowance on mortgage servicing rights, net
    7,449       (410 )
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights
    14,060       11,870  
Amortization of other intangible assets
    4,157       4,705  
Amortization and accretion on earning assets, funding, and other, net
    40,487       4,619  
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
    1       2,002  
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
          (765 )
(Gain) loss on sales of investment securities, net and impairment write-downs
    (9,169 )     17,243  
Loss on sales of assets, net
    2,520       614  
Gain on mortgage banking activities, net
    (36,424 )     (12,395 )
Mortgage loans originated and acquired for sale
    (3,053,135 )     (1,166,530 )
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale
    3,063,707       1,215,990  
Decrease in interest receivable
    6,967       11,308  
Decrease in interest payable
    (12,213 )     (12,226 )
Net change in other assets and other liabilities
    (341,427 )     (8,001 )
     
Net cash provided by operating activities
    107,289       377,725  
     
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
               
Net (increase) decrease in loans
    1,235,566       (905,742 )
Purchases of:
               
Investment securities
    (2,996,256 )     (1,098,962 )
Premises, equipment, and software, net of disposals
    (13,753 )     (23,012 )
Other assets
    (5,914 )     (7,068 )
Proceeds from:
               
Sales of investment securities
    689,689       3,550  
Calls and maturities of investment securities
    1,898,660       992,702  
Sales of other assets
    43,841       34,469  
     
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    851,833       (1,004,063 )
     
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
Net increase in deposits
    1,291,313       271,754  
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings
    (2,186,342 )     879,228  
Repayment of long-term funding
    (500,102 )     (528,365 )
Proceeds from issuance of long-term funding
    400,000       225,821  
Cash dividends on common stock
    (53,931 )     (121,368 )
Cash dividends on preferred stock
    (19,687 )      
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net
    16       7,429  
Purchase of treasury stock
    (591 )      
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
          765  
     
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (1,069,324 )     735,264  
     
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (110,202 )     108,926  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    570,728       587,149  
     
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 460,526     $ 696,075  
     
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 215,245     $ 355,699  
Cash paid for income taxes
    30,813       68,882  
Loans and bank premises transferred to other real estate owned
    49,401       39,890  
Capitalized mortgage servicing rights
    37,007       14,250  
     
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

ITEM 1. Financial Statements Continued:
ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted or abbreviated. The information contained in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes in Associated Banc-Corp’s 2008 annual report on Form 10-K, should be referred to in connection with the reading of these unaudited interim financial statements.
NOTE 1: Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Associated Banc-Corp (individually referred to herein as the “Parent Company,” and together with all of its subsidiaries and affiliates, collectively referred to herein as the “Corporation”) for the periods presented, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Management has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition or disclosure through November 9, 2009, the date of the filing of the consolidated financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include the determination of the allowance for loan losses, mortgage servicing rights valuation, derivative financial instruments and hedging activities, and income taxes.
NOTE 2: Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements of prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current period’s presentation.
NOTE 3: New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard which established the Codification to become the single source of authoritative accounting principles. The standard also provides the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification is not intended to change generally accepted accounting principles, but is expected to simplify accounting research by reorganizing current generally accepted accounting principles into specific accounting topics. The Corporation adopted this accounting standard in the third quarter of 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” had no impact on the Corporation’s results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
In May 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard intended to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this accounting standard requires companies to disclose the date

7


Table of Contents

through which they have evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, as to whether it represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. It also provides guidance regarding circumstances under which companies should and should not recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in their financial statements. This accounting standard also includes disclosure requirements for certain events and transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date, which were not recognized in the financial statements. This accounting standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Corporation adopted this accounting standard in the second quarter of 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events,” had no material impact on the Corporation’s results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
In March 2008, the FASB issued an accounting standard applicable to all derivative instruments. This standard provides financial statement users with increased qualitative, quantitative, and credit-risk disclosures related to derivative financial instruments and hedging activities. It requires enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The accounting standard is to be applied prospectively for interim periods and fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Corporation adopted this accounting standard at the beginning of 2009. See Note 11, “Derivative and Hedging Activities,” for additional disclosures required under this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.”
In December 2007, the FASB issued an accounting standard which requires noncontrolling interests to be treated as a separate component of equity, rather than a liability or other item outside of equity. This standard also requires the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the income statement. Changes in a parent’s ownership interest, as long as the parent retains a controlling financial interest, must be accounted for as equity transactions, and should a parent cease to have a controlling financial interest, the standard requires the parent to recognize a gain or loss in net income. Expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements are required by this statement and must clearly identify and distinguish between the interest of the parent’s owners and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. This accounting standard is to be applied prospectively for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with the exception of presentation and disclosure requirements, which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The Corporation adopted this accounting standard at the beginning of 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation,” had no material impact on the Corporation’s results of operations, financial position and liquidity.
In December 2007, the FASB issued an accounting standard which requires an acquirer to recognize identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their full fair values at that date, with limited exceptions. Assets and liabilities assumed that arise from contractual contingencies as of the acquisition date must also be measured at their acquisition-date full fair values. The standard requires the acquirer to recognize goodwill as of the acquisition date, and in the case of a bargain purchase business combination, the acquirer shall recognize a gain. Acquisition-related costs are to be expensed in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received. Additional presentation and disclosure requirements have also been established to enable financial statement users to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effects of business combinations. This accounting standard is to be applied prospectively for acquisition dates on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Corporation adopted this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations,” at the beginning of 2009. The Corporation did not have any business combination activity

8


Table of Contents

for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which amended other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) guidance in generally accepted accounting principles for debt securities by requiring a write-down when fair value is below amortized cost in circumstances where: (1) an entity has the intent to sell a security; (2) it is more likely than not that an entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) an entity does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. If an entity intends to sell a security or if it is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery, an OTTI write-down is recognized in earnings equal to the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value. If an entity does not intend to sell the security or it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI write-down is separated into an amount representing credit loss, which is recognized in earnings, and an amount related to all other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. This accounting standard does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to OTTI write-downs of equity securities. This accounting standard also extends disclosure requirements related to debt and equity securities to interim reporting periods. The Corporation adopted this accounting standard in the second quarter of 2009, and recognized a net cumulative effect adjustment of $9.7 million to retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income as of April 1, 2009. See the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the impact of the initial adoption and Note 6, “Investment Securities,” for additional information and disclosures concerning this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 320, “Investments — Debt and Equity Securities.”
In April 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard related to disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments in interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies that were previously only required to be disclosed in annual financial statements. The Corporation adopted this accounting standard in the second quarter of 2009. See Note 13, “Fair Value Measurements,” for additional disclosures related to this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments.”
In April 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which provided guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased and in identifying transactions that are not orderly. In such instances, the accounting standard provides that management may determine that further analysis of the transactions or quoted prices is required, and a significant adjustment to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Corporation adopted this accounting standard in the second quarter of 2009, with no material impact on its results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. See Note 13, “Fair Value Measurements,” for additional disclosures concerning this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”
In June 2008, the FASB issued an accounting standard which determined that all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards with rights to nonforfeitable dividends are considered participating securities. Because they are considered participating securities, the Corporation is required to apply the two-class method in computing basic and diluted earnings per share. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Corporation adopted this accounting standard at the beginning of 2009, as required, with no material impact on its results of operations, financial position and liquidity. See Note 4, “Earnings Per Share,” for additional disclosures concerning this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share.”

9


Table of Contents

NOTE 4: Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share are calculated utilizing the two-class method. Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common shareholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share are calculated by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common shareholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock awards (outstanding stock options, unvested restricted stock, and outstanding stock warrants) and unsettled share repurchases. Presented below are the calculations for basic and diluted earnings per common share.
                                 
    For the three months ended   For the nine months ended
    September 30,   September 30,
    2009   2008   2009   2008
    (In Thousands, except per share data)
Net income
  $ 15,994     $ 37,769     $ 41,378     $ 151,593  
Preferred dividends and discount accretion
    (7,342 )           (21,994 )      
           
Net income available to common equity
  $ 8,652     $ 37,769     $ 19,384     $ 151,593  
     
Common shareholder dividends
    (6,393 )     (40,814 )     (53,708 )     (121,045 )
Unvested share-based payment awards
    (26 )     (107 )     (223 )     (322 )
           
Undistributed earnings
  $ 2,233     $ (3,152 )   $ (34,547 )   $ 30,226  
     
 
                               
Basic
                               
Distributed earnings to common shareholders
  $ 6,393     $ 40,814     $ 53,708     $ 121,045  
Undistributed earnings to common shareholders
    2,224       (3,152 )     (34,547 )     30,148  
           
Total common shareholders earnings, basic
  $ 8,617     $ 37,662     $ 19,161     $ 151,193  
     
 
                               
Diluted
                               
Distributed earnings to common shareholders
  $ 6,393     $ 40,814     $ 53,708     $ 121,045  
Undistributed earnings to common shareholders
    2,224       (3,152 )     (34,547 )     30,148  
           
Total common shareholders earnings, diluted
  $ 8,617     $ 37,662     $ 19,161     $ 151,193  
     
 
                               
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    127,863       127,553       127,855       127,428  
Effect of dilutive stock awards and unsettled share repurchases
          69       4       371  
           
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
    127,863       127,622       127,859       127,799  
 
                               
Basic earnings per common share
  $ 0.07     $ 0.30     $ 0.15     $ 1.19  
     
Diluted earnings per common share
  $ 0.07     $ 0.30     $ 0.15     $ 1.18  
     

10


Table of Contents

NOTE 5: Stock-Based Compensation
The fair value of stock options granted is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, while the fair value of restricted stock shares is their fair market value on the date of grant. The fair values of stock grants are amortized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the grants. Compensation expense recognized is included in personnel expense in the consolidated statements of income.
Assumptions are used in estimating the fair value of stock options granted. The weighted average expected life of the stock option represents the period of time that stock options are expected to be outstanding and is estimated using historical data of stock option exercises and forfeitures. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Corporation’s stock. The following weighted average assumptions were used in estimating the fair value for stock options granted in the first nine months of 2009 and full year 2008.
                 
    2009   2008
     
Dividend yield
    4.97 %     5.12 %
Risk-free interest rate
    1.85 %     2.77 %
Expected volatility
    35.84 %     21.32 %
Expected life
  6 yrs   6 yrs
Per share fair value of stock options
  $ 3.60     $ 2.74  
The Corporation is required to estimate potential forfeitures of stock grants and adjust compensation expense recorded accordingly. The estimate of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period to the extent that actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized in the period of change and will also impact the amount of stock compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.
A summary of the Corporation’s stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, is presented below.
                                 
            Weighted Average   Weighted Average Remaining   Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Stock Options   Shares   Exercise Price   Contractual Term   (000s)
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
    6,319,413     $ 27.43                  
Granted
    1,256,790       24.35                  
Exercised
    (576,685 )     18.20                  
Forfeited or expired
    (417,816 )     30.55                  
                     
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
    6,581,702     $ 27.45       5.87     $ (42,922 )
                     
Options exercisable at December 31, 2008
    4,770,537     $ 27.44       4.77     $ (31,076 )
                     
 
                               
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
    6,581,702     $ 27.45                  
Granted
    956,998       17.15                  
Exercised
    (945 )     16.70                  
Forfeited or expired
    (767,295 )     25.67                  
                     
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
    6,770,460     $ 26.20       5.86     $ (100,063 )
                     
Options exercisable at September 30, 2009
    4,832,624     $ 27.80       4.72     $ (79,166 )
                     

11


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes information about the Corporation’s nonvested stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2008, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
                 
            Weighted Average
Stock Options   Shares   Grant Date Fair Value
 
Nonvested at December 31, 2007
    1,030,125     $ 6.03  
Granted
    1,256,790       2.74  
Vested
    (337,557 )     6.06  
Forfeited
    (138,193 )     4.66  
 
               
Nonvested at December 31, 2008
    1,811,165     $ 3.85  
 
               
Granted
    956,998       3.60  
Vested
    (630,298 )     4.11  
Forfeited
    (200,029 )     4.32  
 
               
Nonvested at September 30, 2009
    1,937,836     $ 3.59  
 
               
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the intrinsic value of stock options exercised was immaterial (less than $0.1 million), while for the year ended December 31, 2008, the intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $3.8 million. (Intrinsic value represents the amount by which the fair market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the stock option.) During the first nine months of 2009, less than $0.1 million was received for the exercise of stock options. The total grant date fair value of stock options that vested was $2.6 million for the first nine months of 2009 and $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation recognized compensation expense of $2.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively, for the vesting of stock options. For the full year 2008, the Corporation recognized compensation expense of $3.0 million for the vesting of stock options. At September 30, 2009, the Corporation had $4.3 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options that is expected to be recognized over the remaining requisite service periods that extend predominantly through fourth quarter 2011.
The following table summarizes information about the Corporation’s restricted stock share activity for the year ended December 31, 2008, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
                 
            Weighted Average
Restricted Stock   Shares   Grant Date Fair Value
  | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
    164,840     $ 33.14  
Granted
    265,900       24.43  
Vested
    (69,074 )     32.47  
Forfeited
    (7,339 )     32.21  
 
               
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
    354,327     $ 26.75  
 
               
Granted
    351,133       16.76  
Vested
    (139,438 )     28.31  
Forfeited
    (51,519 )     21.88  
 
               
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
    514,503     $ 20.00  
 
               
The Corporation amortizes the expense related to restricted stock awards as compensation expense over the requisite service period. Expense for restricted stock awards of approximately $3.5 million and $3.0 million was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, while expense for restricted stock awards of approximately $4.0 million was recognized for the full year 2008. The Corporation had $6.8 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock shares at September 30, 2009, that is expected to be recognized over the remaining requisite service periods that extend predominantly through fourth quarter 2011.
The Corporation issues shares from treasury, when available, or new shares upon the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock shares. The Board of Directors has authorized management to repurchase shares of the Corporation’s common stock each quarter in the market, to be made available for

12


Table of Contents

issuance in connection with the Corporation’s employee incentive plans and for other corporate purposes. The repurchase of shares will be based on market opportunities, capital levels, growth prospects, and other investment opportunities, and is subject to restrictions under the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”).
NOTE 6: Investment Securities
The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities available for sale were as follows.
                                 
            Gross   Gross    
            unrealized   unrealized    
    Amortized cost   gains   losses   Fair value
    ($ in Thousands)
September 30, 2009:
                               
U.S. Treasury securities
  $ 3,893     $ 3     $     $ 3,896  
Federal agency securities
    42,975       1,656       (1 )     44,630  
Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)
    865,415       35,399       (208 )     900,606  
Residential mortgage-related securities
    4,534,217       132,885       (10,898 )     4,656,204  
Other securities (debt and equity)
    46,105       1,357       (1,722 )     45,740  
     
Total investment securities available for sale
  $ 5,492,605     $ 171,300     $ (12,829 )   $ 5,651,076  
     
                                 
            Gross   Gross    
            unrealized   unrealized    
    Amortized cost   gains   losses   Fair value
    ($ in Thousands)
December 31, 2008:
                               
U.S. Treasury securities
  $ 4,985     $ 10     $ (29 )   $ 4,966  
Federal agency securities
    75,816       1,195       (1 )     77,010  
Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)
    913,216       16,581       (4,194 )     925,603  
Residential mortgage-related securities
    4,032,784       54,128       (9,481 )     4,077,431  
Other securities (debt and equity)
    58,272       639       (507 )     58,404  
           
Total investment securities available for sale
  $ 5,085,073     $ 72,553     $ (14,212 )   $ 5,143,414  
     
The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities available for sale at September 30, 2009, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
                 
($ in Thousands)   Amortized Cost   Fair Value
     
Due in one year or less
  $ 169,915     $ 175,206  
Due after one year through five years
    221,477       234,413  
Due after five years through ten years
    411,851       430,655  
Due after ten years
    147,033       145,185  
     
Total debt securities
    950,276       985,459  
Residential mortgage-related securities
    4,534,217       4,656,204  
Equity securities
    8,112       9,413  
     
Total investment securities available for sale
  $ 5,492,605     $ 5,651,076  
     

13


Table of Contents

The following represents gross unrealized losses and the related fair value of investment securities available for sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2009.
                                                 
    Less than 12 months   12 months or more   Total
    Unrealized           Unrealized           Unrealized    
    Losses   Fair Value   Losses   Fair Value   Losses   Fair Value
    ($ in Thousands)
September 30, 2009:
                                               
Federal agency securities
  $ (1 )   $ 47     $     $     $ (1 )   $ 47  
Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)
    (14 )     3,284       (194 )     3,046       (208 )     6,330  
Residential mortgage-related securities
    (7,061 )     100,890       (3,837 )     44,708       (10,898 )     145,598  
Other securities (debt and equity)
    (1,722 )     4,460                   (1,722 )     4,460  
     
Total
  $ (8,798 )   $ 108,681     $ (4,031 )   $ 47,754     $ (12,829 )   $ 156,435  
     
The Corporation reviews the investment securities portfolio on a quarterly basis to monitor its exposure to other-than-temporary impairment that may result due to the current adverse economic conditions. A determination as to whether a security’s decline in market value is other-than-temporary takes into consideration numerous factors and the relative significance of any single factor can vary by security. Some factors the Corporation may consider in the other-than-temporary impairment analysis include, the length of time the security has been in an unrealized loss position, changes in security ratings, financial condition of the issuer, as well as security and industry specific economic conditions. In addition, with regards to its debt securities, the Corporation may also evaluate payment structure, whether there are defaulted payments or expected defaults, prepayment speeds, and the value of any underlying collateral. For certain debt securities in unrealized loss positions, the Corporation prepares cash flow analyses to compare the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security.
Based on the Corporation’s evaluation, management does not believe any remaining unrealized loss at September 30, 2009 represents an other-than-temporary impairment as these unrealized losses are primarily attributable to changes in interest rates and the current volatile market conditions, and not credit deterioration. At September 30, 2009, the number of investment securities in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months for municipal and mortgage-related securities was 5 and 14, respectively. For investment securities in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more, the number of individual securities in the municipal and mortgage-related categories was 4 and 33, respectively. The unrealized losses reported for mortgage-related securities relate to non-agency mortgage-related securities as well as mortgage-related securities issued by government agencies such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”). The Corporation currently does not intend to sell nor does it believe that it will be required to sell the securities contained in the above unrealized losses table before recovery of their amortized cost basis.
The Corporation recognized net investment securities gains of $9.2 million for the first nine months of 2009. These net investment securities gains were attributable to gains of $14.6 million on the sale of mortgage-related securities, partially offset by a $2.9 million loss on the sale of a mortgage-related security and credit-related other-than-temporary write-downs of $2.5 million on the Corporation’s holding of a trust preferred debt security, a non-agency mortgage-related security, and various equity securities. At September 30, 2009, the remaining carrying values of the specific securities with other-than-temporary write-downs were $49.3 million for two non-agency mortgage-related securities, $0.2 million for the FHLMC and FNMA preferred stock securities combined, $4.1 million for the trust preferred debt securities pools, $0.1 million for the trust preferred debt security, and $0.3 million for the common equity securities.

14


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the credit loss portion of other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings on debt securities.
                         
    Non-agency        
    Mortgage-Related   Trust Preferred    
$ in Thousands   Securities   Debt Securities   Total
     
Balance of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment at April 1, 2009
  $ (16,445 )   $ (5,027 )   $ (21,472 )
Adjustment for change in cash flows
    306             306  
Credit losses on newly identified impairment
          (1,000 )     (1,000 )
         
Balance of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment at June 30, 2009
  $ (16,139 )   $ (6,027 )   $ (22,166 )
Adjustment for change in cash flows
    172             172  
Credit losses on newly identified impairment
    (200 )     (900 )     (1,100 )
         
Balance of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment at September 30, 2009
  $ (16,167 )   $ (6,927 )   $ (23,094 )
     
For comparative purposes, the following represents gross unrealized losses and the related fair value of investment securities available for sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2008.
                                                 
    Less than 12 months   12 months or more   Total
    Unrealized           Unrealized           Unrealized    
    Losses   Fair Value   Losses   Fair Value   Losses   Fair Value
    ($ in Thousands)
December 31, 2008:
                                               
U. S. Treasury securities
  $ (29 )   $ 3,960     $     $     $ (29 )   $ 3,960  
Federal agency securities
                (1 )     52       (1 )     52  
Obligations of state and political subdivisions (municipal securities)
    (3,645 )     128,571       (549 )     21,752       (4,194 )     150,323  
Residential mortgage-related securities
    (2,240 )     268,626       (7,241 )     140,021       (9,481 )     408,647  
Other securities (debt and equity)
    (445 )     3,798       (62 )     206       (507 )     4,004  
     
Total
  $ (6,359 )   $ 404,955     $ (7,853 )   $ 162,031     $ (14,212 )   $ 566,986  
     
NOTE 7: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill: Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to impairment tests on at least an annual basis. Consistent with prior years, the Corporation has elected to conduct its annual impairment testing in May. Due to changes in the business climate and the resulting decline in financial services stock prices, management also completed an interim review of goodwill as of September 30, 2009. Based on this analysis, the fair value of the Corporation’s reporting units exceeded the fair value of its assets and liabilities and, therefore, no impairment loss was recorded. However, market valuations of financial services companies remain depressed relative to book values due to continuing uncertainty surrounding the timing of economic recovery as well as the impact of the government programs. As a result, management believes it may be necessary to continue to evaluate goodwill for impairment on a quarterly basis depending upon current market conditions, results of operations, and other factors. It is possible that a future conclusion could be reached that all or a portion of the Corporation’s goodwill may be impaired, in which case a non-cash charge for the amount of such impairment would be recorded in earnings. Such a charge, if any, would have no impact on tangible capital and would not affect the Corporation’s “well-capitalized” designation.

15


Table of Contents

At September 30, 2009, goodwill of $907 million was assigned to the banking segment and goodwill of $22 million was assigned to the wealth management segment. There was no change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and the year ended December 31, 2008.
Other Intangible Assets: The Corporation has other intangible assets that are amortized, consisting of core deposit intangibles, other intangibles (primarily related to customer relationships acquired in connection with the Corporation’s insurance agency acquisitions), and mortgage servicing rights. The core deposit intangibles and mortgage servicing rights are assigned to the banking segment, while the other intangibles are assigned to the wealth management segment as of September 30, 2009.
For core deposit intangibles and other intangibles, changes in the gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization, and net book value were as follows. The $0.2 million deduction during 2008 was attributable to the write-off of unamortized customer list intangibles related to the sale of third party administration business contracts.
                 
    At or for the   At or for the
    Nine months ended   Year ended
    September 30, 2009   December 31, 2008
    ($ in Thousands)
Core deposit intangibles:
               
Gross carrying amount
  $ 47,748     $ 47,748  
Accumulated amortization
    (28,257 )     (25,165 )
     
Net book value
  $ 19,491     $ 22,583  
     
 
               
Amortization during the period
  $ 3,092     $ 4,585  
 
               
Other intangibles:
               
Gross carrying amount
  $ 20,433     $ 20,433  
Accumulated amortization
    (9,484 )     (8,419 )
     
Net book value
  $ 10,949     $ 12,014  
     
 
               
Deductions during the period
  $     $ 167  
Amortization during the period
  $ 1,065     $ 1,684  
Mortgage servicing rights are included in other intangible assets, net in the consolidated balance sheets and are carried at the lower of amortized cost (i.e., initial capitalized amount, net of accumulated amortization) or estimated fair value. Mortgage servicing rights are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income, and assessed for impairment at each reporting date. Impairment is assessed based on fair value at each reporting date using estimated prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgage loans serviced and stratifications based on the risk characteristics of the underlying loans (predominantly loan type and note interest rate). As mortgage interest rates fall, prepayment speeds are usually faster and the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset generally decreases, requiring additional valuation reserve. Conversely, as mortgage interest rates rise, prepayment speeds are usually slower and the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset generally increases, requiring less valuation reserve. A valuation allowance is established through a charge to earnings to the extent the amortized cost of the mortgage servicing rights exceeds the estimated fair value by stratification. If it is later determined that all or a portion of the temporary impairment no longer exists for a stratification, the valuation is reduced through a recovery to earnings. An other-than-temporary impairment (i.e., recoverability is considered remote when considering interest rates and loan pay off activity) is recognized as a write-down of the mortgage servicing rights asset and the related valuation allowance (to the extent a valuation reserve is available) and then against earnings. A direct write-down permanently reduces the carrying value of the mortgage servicing rights asset and valuation allowance, precluding subsequent recoveries. See Note 13, “Fair Value Measurements,” which further discusses fair value measurement relative to the mortgage servicing rights asset.

16


Table of Contents

A summary of changes in the balance of the mortgage servicing rights asset and the mortgage servicing rights valuation allowance follows.
                 
    At or for the   At or for the
    Nine months ended   Year ended
    September 30, 2009   December 31, 2008
    ($ in Thousands)
Mortgage servicing rights:
               
Mortgage servicing rights at beginning of period
  $ 56,025     $ 54,819  
Additions
    37,007       17,263  
Amortization
    (14,060 )     (16,057 )
     
Mortgage servicing rights at end of period
  $ 78,972     $ 56,025  
     
Valuation allowance at beginning of period
    (10,457 )     (3,632 )
(Additions) / Recoveries, net
    (7,449 )     (6,825 )
     
Valuation allowance at end of period
    (17,906 )     (10,457 )
     
Mortgage servicing rights, net
  $ 61,066     $ 45,568  
     
 
               
Fair value of mortgage servicing rights
  $ 66,130     $ 52,882  
 
               
Portfolio of residential mortgage loans serviced for others (“servicing portfolio”)
  $ 7,473,000     $ 6,606,000  
Mortgage servicing rights, net to servicing portfolio
    0.82 %     0.69 %
Mortgage servicing rights expense (1)
  $ 21,509     $ 22,882  
 
(1)   Includes the amortization of mortgage servicing rights and additions/recoveries to the valuation allowance of mortgage servicing rights, and is a component of mortgage banking, net in the consolidated statements of income.
The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense for amortizing intangible assets. The projections of amortization expense for the next five years are based on existing asset balances, the current interest rate environment, and prepayment speeds as of September 30, 2009. The actual amortization expense the Corporation recognizes in any given period may be significantly different depending upon acquisition or sale activities, changes in interest rates, prepayment speeds, market conditions, regulatory requirements, and events or circumstances that indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
                         
    Core Deposit   Other   Mortgage Servicing
    Intangibles   Intangibles   Rights
    ($ in Thousands)
Estimated amortization expense:
                       
Three months ending December 31, 2009
  $ 1,000     $ 400     $ 5,200  
Year ending December 31, 2010
    3,700       1,200       18,700  
Year ending December 31, 2011
    3,700       1,000       15,400  
Year ending December 31, 2012
    3,200       1,000       12,100  
Year ending December 31, 2013
    3,100       900       9,300  
Year ending December 31, 2014
    2,900       900       7,000  

17


Table of Contents

NOTE 8: Long-term Funding
Long-term funding (funding with original contractual maturities greater than one year) was as follows.
                 
    September 30,   December 31,
    2009   2008
    ($ in Thousands)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
  $ 818,092     $ 1,118,140  
Repurchase agreements
    500,000       300,000  
Subordinated debt, net
    225,200       225,058  
Junior subordinated debentures, net
    216,124       216,291  
Other borrowed funds
    2,090       2,158  
       
Total long-term funding
  $ 1,761,506     $ 1,861,647  
     
Federal Home Loan Bank advances: Long-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) had maturities through 2020 and had weighted-average interest rates of 3.22% at September 30, 2009, compared to 3.53% at December 31, 2008. These advances had a combination of fixed and variable contractual rates, of which, none were variable at September 30, 2009, and 27% were variable at December 31, 2008. In September 2007, the Corporation entered into an interest rate swap to hedge the interest rate risk in the cash flows of a $200 million variable rate, long-term FHLB advance. The $200 million variable rate, long-term FHLB advance and the related interest rate swap matured in June 2009. The fair value of the derivative was a $3.2 million loss at December 31, 2008.
Repurchase agreements: The long-term repurchase agreements had maturities through 2011 and had weighted-average interest rates of 2.60% at September 30, 2009, and 3.27% at December 31, 2008. These repurchase agreements were 20% and 33% variable rate at September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Subordinated debt: In September 2008, the Corporation issued $26 million of 10-year subordinated debt with a 5-year no-call provision, and in August 2001, the Corporation issued $200 million of 10-year subordinated debt. The subordinated notes were each issued at a discount, and the September 2008 debt has a fixed coupon interest rate of 9.25%, while the August 2001 debt has a fixed coupon interest rate of 6.75%. Subordinated debt qualifies under the risk-based capital guidelines as Tier 2 supplementary capital for regulatory purposes, and is discounted in accordance with regulations when the debt has five years or less remaining to maturity.
Junior subordinated debentures: The Corporation has $180.4 million of junior subordinated debentures (“ASBC Debentures”), which carry a fixed rate of 7.625% and mature on June 15, 2032. Beginning May 30, 2007, the Corporation has had the right to redeem the ASBC Debentures, at par. The carrying value of the ASBC Debentures was $179.6 million at September 30, 2009. With its October 2005 acquisition, the Corporation acquired variable rate junior subordinated debentures at a premium (the “SFSC Debentures”), from two equal issuances (contractually $30.9 million on a combined basis), of which one pays a variable rate adjusted quarterly based on the 90-day LIBOR plus 2.80% (or 3.29% at September 30, 2009) and matures April 23, 2034, and the other which pays a variable rate adjusted quarterly based on the 90-day LIBOR plus 3.45% (or 3.89% at September 30, 2009) and matures November 7, 2032. The Corporation has the right to redeem the SFSC Debentures, at par, on a quarterly basis. The carrying value of the SFSC Debentures was $36.5 million at September 30, 2009.

18


Table of Contents

NOTE 9: Other Comprehensive Income
A summary of activity in accumulated other comprehensive income follows.
                         
    Nine Months Ended   Year Ended
    September 30,   September 30,   December 31,
    2009   2008   2008
    ($ in Thousands)
Net income
  $ 41,378     $ 151,593     $ 168,452  
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
                       
Investment securities available for sale:
                       
Net unrealized gains (losses)
    119,436       (30,160 )     (8,817 )
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains)/losses realized in net income
    (9,169 )     17,243       52,541  
Accretion of investment securities with noncredit-related impairment losses not expected to be sold
    316              
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (39,873 )     5,067       (16,559 )
     
Other comprehensive income (loss) on investment securities available for sale
    70,710       (7,850 )     27,165  
Defined benefit pension and postretirement obligations:
                       
Prior service cost, net of amortization
    348       356       472  
Net gain (loss), net of amortization
    233       225       (29,362 )
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (227 )     (235 )     11,556  
     
Other comprehensive income (loss) on pension and postretirement obligations
    354       346       (17,334 )
Derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships:
                       
Net unrealized gains (losses)
    6,236       (2,161 )     (16,679 )
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses and interest expense for interest differential on derivatives realized in net income
    (313 )     1,635       4,343  
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (2,378 )     196       5,058  
     
Other comprehensive income (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships
    3,545       (330 )     (7,278 )
     
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
    74,609       (7,834 )     2,553  
     
Comprehensive income
  $ 115,987     $ 143,759     $ 171,005  
     
NOTE 10: Income Taxes
For the first nine months of 2009, the Corporation recognized income tax benefit of $35.8 million compared to income tax expense of $51.6 million for the first nine months of 2008. The reduction in income tax expense was primarily due to the level of pretax income between the comparable nine-month periods. In addition, during the first quarter of 2009 the Corporation recorded a $17.0 million net decrease in the valuation allowance on and changes to state deferred tax assets as a result of the recently enacted Wisconsin combined reporting tax legislation, while during the second quarter of 2009 the Corporation recorded a $5.0 million decrease in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. Also, the first quarter 2008 resolution of certain tax matters and changes in the estimated exposure of uncertain tax positions, partially offset by the increase in valuation allowance related to certain deferred tax assets, resulted in the net reduction of previously recorded tax liabilities and income tax expense of approximately $4.4 million.

19


Table of Contents

NOTE 11: Derivative and Hedging Activities
The Corporation uses derivative instruments primarily to hedge the variability in interest payments or protect the value of certain assets and liabilities recorded on its consolidated balance sheet from changes in interest rates. The predominant derivative and hedging activities include interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, interest rate collars, and certain mortgage banking activities. The contract or notional amount of a derivative is used to determine, along with the other terms of the derivative, the amounts to be exchanged between the counterparties. The Corporation is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to financial instruments. To mitigate the counterparty risk, interest rate swap agreements generally contain language outlining collateral pledging requirements for each counterparty. Collateral must be posted when the market value changes exceed certain threshold limits which are determined from the credit ratings of each counterparty. The Corporation was required to pledge $68 million of investment securities and cash equivalents as collateral at September 30, 2009, and pledged $71 million of investment securities and cash equivalents as collateral at December 31, 2008.
The Corporation’s derivative and hedging instruments are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 13, “Fair Value Measurements,” for additional fair value information and disclosures.
The table below identifies the balance sheet category and fair values of the Corporation’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges.
                                                 
                            Weighted Average
    Notional           Balance Sheet   Receive   Pay    
    Amount   Fair Value   Category   Rate   Rate   Maturity
    ($ in Thousands)                                
September 30, 2009
                                               
Interest rate swap – short-term borrowings
  $ 200,000     $ (8,388 )   Other liabilities     0.15 %     3.15 %   29 months
 
 
                                               
December 31, 2008
                                               
Interest rate swap – FHLB advance
  $ 200,000     $ (3,174 )   Other liabilities     1.38 %     4.42 %   6 months
Interest rate swap – short-term borrowings
    200,000       (11,449 )   Other liabilities     0.15 %     3.15 %   38 months
 
The table below identifies the gains and losses recognized on the Corporation’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges.
                                         
    After Tax                           Gross
    Amount of Gain   Category of   Amount of Gain   Category of   Amount of
    / (Loss)   Gain / (Loss)   / (Loss)   Gain / (Loss)   Gain / (Loss)
    Recognized in   Reclassified   Reclassified   Recognized in   Recognized
    OCI on   from AOCI into   from AOCI into   Income on   in Income on
    Derivatives   Income   Income   Derivatives   Derivatives
    (Effective   (Effective   (Effective   (Ineffective   (Ineffective
($ in Thousands)   Portion)   Portion)   Portion)   Portion)   Portion)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
          Interest Expense           Interest Expense        
Interest rate swap – short-term borrowings
  $ 3,545     Short-term borrowings   $     Short-term borrowings   $ (313 )
 
 
                                       
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
          Interest Expense           Interest Expense        
Interest rate swap – FHLB advance
  $ (330 )   Long-term funding   $     Long-term funding   $ (29 )
 

20


Table of Contents

Cash flow hedges
The Corporation has variable-rate short-term and long-term borrowings which expose the Corporation to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. To manage the interest rate risk related to the variability of these interest payments, the Corporation has entered into various interest rate swap agreements.
During the third quarter of 2008, the Corporation entered into two interest rate swap agreements which hedge the interest rate risk in the cash flows of certain short-term, variable-rate borrowings. In September 2007, the Corporation entered into an interest rate swap which hedges the interest rate risk in the cash flows of a long-term, variable-rate FHLB advance, which matured in June 2009. Hedge effectiveness is determined using regression analysis. The Corporation recognized combined ineffectiveness of $0.3 million for the first nine months of 2009 (which decreased interest expense) and $0.3 million for full year 2008 (which increased interest expense) relating to these cash flow hedge relationships. No components of the derivatives change in fair value were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Derivative gains and losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to current period earnings are included in interest expense on short-term borrowings or long-term funding (i.e., the line item in which the hedged cash flows are recorded). At September 30, 2009, accumulated other comprehensive income included a deferred after-tax net loss of $4.9 million related to these derivatives, compared to a deferred after-tax net loss of $8.5 million at December 31, 2008. The net after-tax derivative loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income at September 30, 2009, is projected to be reclassified into net interest income in conjunction with the recognition of interest payments on the variable-rate, short-term borrowings through September 2011.
The table below identifies the balance sheet category and fair values of the Corporation’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments.
                                                 
                            Weighted Average
    Notional           Balance Sheet   Receive   Pay        
    Amount   Fair Value   Category   Rate   Rate Maturity
     
    ($ in Thousands)                                
September 30, 2009
                                               
Interest rate swaps — customer and mirror
  $ 982,000     $ 56,154     Other assets     2.15 %     2.15 %   48 months
Interest rate caps — customer and mirror
    73,128       882     Other assets               39 months
Interest rate collars — customer and mirror
    26,079       2,288     Other assets               32 months
Interest rate swaps — customer and mirror
    982,000       (57,426 )   Other liabilities     2.15 %     2.15 %   48 months
Interest rate caps — customer and mirror
    73,128       (818 )   Other liabilities               39 months
Interest rate collars — customer and mirror
    26,079       (2,362 )   Other liabilities               32 months
Interest rate lock commitments (mortgage)
    279,309       4,379     Other assets                  
Forward commitments (mortgage)
    361,575       (3,062 )   Other liabilities                  
Foreign currency exchange forwards
    36.317       1,085     Other assets                  
Foreign currency exchange forwards
    33,689       (835 )   Other liabilities                  
 
December 31, 2008
                                               
Interest rate swaps — customer and mirror
  $ 893,631     $ 72,769     Other assets     3.02 %     3.02 %   55 months
Interest rate caps — customer and mirror
    46,362       4     Other assets               15 months
Interest rate collars — customer and mirror
    26,796       2,803     Other assets               42 months
Interest rate swaps — customer and mirror
    893,631       (74,173 )   Other liabilities     3.02 %     3.02 %   55 months
Interest rate caps — customer and mirror
    46,362       (4 )   Other liabilities               15 months
Interest rate collars — customer and mirror
    26,796       (2,897 )   Other liabilities               42 months
Interest rate lock commitments (mortgage)
    508,274       6,630     Other assets                  
Forward commitments (mortgage)
    530,537       (2,500 )   Other liabilities                  
Foreign currency exchange forwards
    26,843       1,420     Other assets                  
Foreign currency exchange forwards
    34,619       (1,271 )   Other liabilities                  
 

21


Table of Contents

     The table below identifies the income statement category of the gains and losses recognized in income on the Corporation’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments.
                         
        Gain / (Loss)
        Recognized in Income
            Three   Nine
    Income Statement Category of   months   months
($ in Thousands)   Gain / (Loss) Recognized in Income   ended   ended
September 30, 2009
                       
Interest rate swaps – customer and mirror, net
  Treasury management fees, net   $ (1,111 )   $ 132  
Interest rate caps – customer and mirror, net
  Treasury management fees, net     7       64  
Interest rate collars – customer and mirror, net
  Treasury management fees, net     3       20  
Interest rate lock commitments (mortgage)
  Mortgage banking, net     2,341       (2,251 )
Forward commitments (mortgage)
  Mortgage banking, net     (8,454 )     (562 )
Foreign exchange forwards
  Treasury management fees, net     374       120  
 
                       
September 30, 2008
                       
Interest rate swaps – customer and mirror, net
  Treasury management fees, net   $     $  
Interest rate caps – customer and mirror, net
  Treasury management fees, net            
Interest rate collars – customer and mirror, net
  Treasury management fees, net            
Interest rate lock commitments (mortgage)
  Mortgage banking, net     191       1,253  
Forward commitments (mortgage)
  Mortgage banking, net     (308 )     961  
Foreign exchange forwards
  Treasury management fees, net     700       38  
Free Standing Derivatives
The Corporation enters into various derivative contracts which are designated as free standing derivative contracts. These derivative contracts are not designated against specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or forecasted transactions and, therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Such derivative contracts are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet with changes in the fair value recorded as a component of Treasury management fees, net, and typically include interest rate swaps, interest rate caps, and interest rate collars. The net impact for the first nine months of 2009 was a $0.2 million gain, while the net impact for the full year 2008 was a $1.5 million net loss and the net impact for the first nine months of 2008 was immaterial.
Free standing derivatives are entered into primarily for the benefit of commercial customers through providing derivative products which enables the customer to manage their exposures to interest rate risk. The Corporation’s market risk from unfavorable movements in interest rates related to these derivative contracts is generally economically hedged by concurrently entering into offsetting derivative contracts. The offsetting derivative contracts have identical notional values, terms and indices.
Mortgage derivatives
Interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans are considered derivative instruments, and the fair value of these commitments is recorded on the consolidated balance sheets with the changes in fair value recorded as a component of mortgage banking, net. The fair value of the mortgage derivatives at September 30, 2009, was a net gain of $1.3 million, comprised of the net gain of $4.4 million on interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale to individual borrowers of approximately $279 million and the net loss of $3.1 million on forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to various investors of approximately $362 million. The fair value of the mortgage derivatives at December 31, 2008, was a net gain of $4.1 million, comprised of the net gain of $6.6 million on interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale to individual borrowers of approximately $508 million and the net loss of $2.5 million on forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to various investors of approximately $531 million. The fair value of the mortgage derivatives at September 30, 2008, was a net gain of $1.1 million, comprised of the net gain of $0.3 million on interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale to individual borrowers of approximately $84 million and the net gain of $0.8 million on forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to various investors of approximately $116 million.

22


Table of Contents

Foreign currency derivatives
The Corporation provides foreign exchange services to customers. The Corporation may enter into a foreign currency forward to mitigate the exchange rate risk attached to the cash flows of a loan or as an offsetting contract to a forward entered into as a service to our customer. At September 30, 2009, the Corporation had $5 million in notional balances of foreign currency forwards related to loans, and $33 million in notional balances of foreign currency forwards related to customer transactions (with mirror foreign currency forwards of $33 million), which on a combined basis had a fair value of $0.2 million net gain. At December 31, 2008, the Corporation had $8 million in notional balances of foreign currency forwards related to loans, and $27 million in notional balances of foreign currency forwards related to customer transactions (with mirror foreign currency forwards of $27 million), which on a combined basis had a fair value of $0.1 million net gain. At September 30, 2008, the Corporation had $13 million in notional balances of foreign currency forwards related to loans, and $38 million in notional balances of foreign currency forwards related to customer transactions (with mirror foreign currency forwards of $38 million), which on a combined basis had a fair value of $0.7 million net gain.
NOTE 12: Commitments, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, and Contingent Liabilities
The Corporation utilizes a variety of financial instruments in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers and to manage its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include lending-related and other commitments (see below) and derivative instruments (see Note 11). The following is a summary of lending-related and other commitments.
                 
    September 30, 2009   December 31, 2008
    ($ in Thousands)
Commitments to extend credit, excluding commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale (1) (2)
  $ 4,293,131     $ 4,885,011  
Commercial letters of credit (1)
    20,804       21,121  
Standby letters of credit (3)
    505,060       563,784  
Purchase obligations (4)
    189,140        
 
(1)   These off-balance sheet financial instruments are exercisable at the market rate prevailing at the date the underlying transaction will be completed and, thus, are deemed to have no current fair value, or the fair value is based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements and is not material at September 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
 
(2)   Interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale are considered derivative instruments and are disclosed in Note 11.
 
(3)   The Corporation has established a liability of $3.3 million and $3.7 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, as an estimate of the fair value of these financial instruments.
 
(4)   The purchase obligations include forward commitments to purchase mortgage-related investment securities issued by government agencies.
Lending-related Commitments
As a financial services provider, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments to extend credit. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans made by the Corporation, with each customer’s creditworthiness evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. The Corporation’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these financial instruments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Corporation upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Since a significant portion of commitments to extend credit are subject to specific restrictive loan covenants or may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements. The Corporation had a reserve for losses on unfunded commitments totaling $3.7 million (included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets) at both September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Lending-related commitments include commitments to extend credit, commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers at predetermined interest rates, as long as there is no

23


Table of Contents

violation of any condition established in the contracts. Interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans are considered derivative instruments, and the fair value of these commitments is recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. The Corporation’s derivative and hedging activity is further described in Note 11. Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate commerce and typically result in the commitment being drawn on when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and the third party, while standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party.
Other Commitments
The Corporation has principal investment commitments to provide capital-based financing to private and public companies through either direct investments in specific companies or through investment funds and partnerships. The timing of future cash requirements to fund such commitments is generally dependent on the investment cycle, whereby privately held companies are funded by private equity investors and ultimately sold, merged, or taken public through an initial offering, which can vary based on overall market conditions, as well as the nature and type of industry in which the companies operate. The Corporation also invests in low-income housing, small-business commercial real estate, new market tax credit projects, and historic tax credit projects to promote the revitalization of low-to-moderate-income neighborhoods throughout the local communities of its bank subsidiary. As a limited partner in these unconsolidated projects, the Corporation is allocated tax credits and deductions associated with the underlying projects. The aggregate carrying value of all these investments at September 30, 2009, was $39 million, included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets, compared to $35 million at December 31, 2008. Related to these investments, the Corporation has remaining commitments to fund of $15 million at September 30, 2009, compared to $21 million at December 31, 2008.
Contingent Liabilities
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation may be named as defendant in or be a party to various pending and threatened legal proceedings. Since it may not be possible to formulate a meaningful opinion as to the range of possible outcomes and plaintiffs’ ultimate damage claims, management cannot estimate the specific possible loss or range of loss that may result from these proceedings. Management believes, based upon current knowledge, that liabilities arising out of any such current proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Corporation.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, Visa, Inc. (“Visa”) announced that it had reached a settlement regarding certain litigation with American Express totaling $2.1 billion. Visa also disclosed in its annual report filed during the fourth quarter of 2007, a $650 million liability related to pending litigation with Discover Financial Services (“Discover”), as well as potential additional exposure for similar pending litigation related to other lawsuits against Visa (for which Visa has not recorded a liability). As a result of the indemnification agreement established as part of Visa’s restructuring transactions in October 2007, banks with a membership interest, including the Corporation, have obligations to share in certain losses with Visa, including these litigation matters. Accordingly, during the fourth quarter of 2007, the Corporation recorded a $2.3 million reserve in other liabilities and a corresponding charge to other noninterest expense for unfavorable litigation losses related to Visa.
Visa matters during 2008 resulted in the Corporation recording a total gain of $5.2 million, which included a $3.2 million gain from the mandatory partial redemption of the Corporation’s Class B common stock in Visa Inc. related to Visa’s initial public offering which was completed during first quarter 2008 and a $2.0 million gain (including a $1.5 million gain in the first quarter of 2008 and a $0.5 million gain in the fourth quarter of 2008) and a corresponding receivable (included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets) for the Corporation’s pro rata interest in the litigation escrow account established by Visa from which

24


Table of Contents

settlements of certain covered litigation will be paid (Visa may add to this over time through a defined process which may involve a further redemption of the Class B common stock). In addition, the Corporation has a zero basis (i.e., historical cost/carryover basis) in the shares of unredeemed Visa Class B common stock which are convertible with limitations into Visa Class A common stock based on a conversion rate that is subject to change in accordance with specified terms (including provision of Visa’s retrospective responsibility plan which provides that Class B stockholders will bear the financial impact of certain covered litigation) and no sooner than the longer of three years or resolution of covered litigation. On October 27, 2008, Visa publicly announced that it had agreed to settle litigation with Discover for $1.9 billion, which includes $1.7 billion from the escrow account created under Visa’s retrospective responsibility plan and that would affect the Corporation’s previously recorded liability estimate which was based on Visa’s original $650 million estimate for the Discover litigation. The Corporation’s pro rata share of approximately $0.5 million in this additional settlement amount was recognized through other noninterest expense in October 2008 (offsetting the $0.5 million gain recognized in the fourth quarter of 2008 noted above). In addition, based upon Visa’s revised liability estimated for Discover litigation, during the fourth quarter of 2008 the Corporation recorded a $0.5 million reduction in the reserve for litigation losses and a corresponding reduction in the Visa escrow receivable. At December 31, 2008, the remaining reserve for unfavorable litigation losses related to Visa was $2.3 million.
During 2009, Visa matters resulted in the Corporation recording a gain of $0.3 million and a corresponding receivable (included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets) for the Corporation’s pro rata interest in the litigation escrow account established by Visa. In addition, based upon Visa’s revised liability estimate for the litigation escrow account, the Corporation recorded a $0.5 million reduction in the reserve for litigation losses and a corresponding reduction in the Visa escrow receivable. At September 30, 2009, the remaining reserve for unfavorable litigation losses related to Visa was $1.8 million.
Residential mortgage loans sold to others are predominantly conventional residential first lien mortgages originated under our usual underwriting procedures, and are most often sold on a nonrecourse basis. The Corporation’s agreements to sell residential mortgage loans in the normal course of business usually require certain representations and warranties on the underlying loans sold, related to credit information, loan documentation, collateral, and insurability, which if subsequently are untrue or breached, could require the Corporation to repurchase certain loans affected. There have been insignificant instances of repurchase under representations and warranties. To a much lesser degree, the Corporation may sell residential mortgage loans with limited recourse (limited in that the recourse period ends prior to the loan’s maturity, usually after certain time and/or loan paydown criteria have been met), whereby repurchase could be required if the loan had defined delinquency issues during the limited recourse periods. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were approximately $100 million and $77 million, respectively, of residential mortgage loans sold with such recourse risk, upon which there have been insignificant instances of repurchase. Given that the underlying loans delivered to buyers are predominantly conventional residential first lien mortgages originated or purchased under our usual underwriting procedures, and that historical experience shows negligible losses and insignificant repurchase activity, management believes that losses and repurchases under the limited recourse provisions will continue to be insignificant.
In October 2004 the Corporation acquired a thrift. Prior to the acquisition, this thrift retained a subordinate position to the FHLB in the credit risk on the underlying residential mortgage loans it sold to the FHLB in exchange for a monthly credit enhancement fee. The Corporation has not sold loans to the FHLB with such credit risk retention since February 2005. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were $1.0 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, of such residential mortgage loans with credit risk recourse, upon which there have been negligible historical losses to the Corporation.

25


Table of Contents

At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Corporation provided a credit guarantee on contracts related to specific commercial loans to unrelated third parties in exchange for a fee. In the event of a customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation is required to reimburse the third party. The maximum amount of credit risk, in the event of nonperformance by the underlying borrowers, is limited to a defined contract liability. In the event of nonperformance, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral value securing the loan. The Corporation has an estimated fair value of approximately $0.3 million related to these credit guarantee contracts at both September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
For certain mortgage loans originated by the Corporation, borrowers may be required to obtain Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI) provided by third-party insurers. The Corporation has entered into reinsurance treaties with certain PMI carriers which provide, among other things, for a sharing of losses within a specified range of the total PMI coverage in exchange for a portion of the PMI premiums. The Corporation’s reinsurance treaties typically provide that the Corporation will assume liability for losses once they exceed 5% of the aggregate risk exposure up to a maximum of 10% of the aggregate risk exposure. At September 30, 2009, the Corporation’s potential risk exposure was approximately $25 million. As of January 1, 2009, the Corporation no longer provides reinsurance coverage for new loans in exchange for a portion of the PMI premium. The Company’s liability for reinsurance losses, including estimated losses incurred but not yet reported, was not material at either September 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
NOTE 13: Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements:
In September 2006, the FASB issued an accounting standard (subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”) which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This accounting standard applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements; accordingly, the standard amends numerous accounting pronouncements but does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances. The standard also emphasizes that fair value (i.e., the price that would be received in an orderly transaction that is not a forced liquidation or distressed sale at the measurement date), among other things, is based on exit price versus entry price, should include assumptions about risk such as nonperformance risk in liability fair values, and is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. When considering the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, this accounting standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy). The fair value hierarchy prioritizes inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels.
     
Level 1 inputs
  Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Corporation has the ability to access.
 
   
Level 2 inputs
  Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.
 
   
Level 3 inputs
  Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.

26


Table of Contents

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Corporation’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the Corporation’s more significant instruments measured on a recurring basis at fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. While the Corporation considered the unfavorable impact of recent economic challenges (including but not limited to weakened economic conditions, disruptions in capital markets, troubled or failed financial institutions, government intervention and actions) on quoted market prices for identical and similar financial instruments, and on inputs or assumptions used, the Corporation accepted the fair values determined under its valuation methodologies.
Investment securities available for sale: Where quoted prices are available in an active market, investment securities are classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 investment securities primarily include U.S. Treasury, Federal agency, and exchange-traded debt and equity securities. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows, with consideration given to the nature of the quote and the relationship of recently evidenced market activity to the fair value estimate, and are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Examples of these investment securities include obligations of state and political subdivisions, mortgage-related securities, and other debt securities. Lastly, in certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the estimated fair value, securities are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. To validate the fair value estimates, assumptions, and controls, the Corporation looks to transactions for similar instruments and utilizes independent pricing provided by third-party vendors or brokers and relevant market indices. While none of these sources are solely indicative of fair value, they serve as directional indicators for the appropriateness of the Corporation’s fair value estimates. The Corporation has determined that the fair value measures of its investment securities are classified predominantly within Level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 6, “Investment Securities,” for additional disclosure regarding the Corporation’s investment securities.
Derivative financial instruments (interest rate): The Corporation uses interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk. In addition, the Corporation offers customer interest rate swaps, caps, and collars to service our customers’ needs, for which the Corporation simultaneously enters into offsetting derivative financial instruments (i.e., mirror interest rate swaps, caps, and collars) with third parties to manage its interest rate risk associated with the customer interest rate swaps, caps, and collars. The valuation of the Corporation’s derivative financial instruments is determined using discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative and, also includes a nonperformance / credit risk component (credit valuation adjustment). See Note 11, “Derivative and Hedging Activities,” for additional disclosure regarding the Corporation’s derivative financial instruments.
The discounted cash flow analysis component in the fair value measurements reflects the contractual terms of the derivative financial instruments, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. More specifically, the fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments), with the variable cash payments (or receipts) based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. Likewise, the fair values of interest rate options (i.e., interest rate caps and collars) are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates fall below (or rise above) the strike rate of the floors (or caps), with the variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the floor (or cap) based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities.

27


Table of Contents

The Corporation also incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative financial instruments for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Corporation has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
While the Corporation has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative financial instruments fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. The Corporation has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions as of September 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008, and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivative financial instruments. Therefore, the Corporation has determined that the fair value measures of its derivative financial instruments in their entirety are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Derivative financial instruments (foreign exchange): The Corporation provides foreign exchange services to customers. In addition, the Corporation may enter into a foreign currency forward to mitigate the exchange rate risk attached to the cash flows of a loan or as an offsetting contract to a forward entered into as a service to our customer. The valuation of the Corporation’s foreign exchange forwards is determined using quoted prices of foreign exchange forwards with similar characteristics, with consideration given to the nature of the quote and the relationship of recently evidenced market activity to the fair value estimate, and are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Mortgage derivatives: Mortgage derivatives include interest rate lock commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale to individual customers and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to various investors. The Corporation relies on an internal valuation model to estimate the fair value of its commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, which includes grouping the interest rate lock commitments by interest rate and terms, applying an estimated pull-through rate based on historical experience, and then multiplying by quoted investor prices determined to be reasonably applicable to the loan commitment groups based on interest rate, terms, and rate lock expiration dates of the loan commitment groups. The Corporation also relies on an internal valuation model to estimate the fair value of its forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans (i.e., an estimate of what the Corporation would receive or pay to terminate the forward delivery contract based on market prices for similar financial instruments), which includes matching specific terms and maturities of the forward commitments against applicable investor pricing available. While there are Level 2 and 3 inputs used in the valuation models, the Corporation has determined that the majority of the inputs significant in the valuation of both of the mortgage derivatives fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 11, “Derivative and Hedging Activities,” for additional disclosure regarding the Corporation’s mortgage derivatives.
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the Corporation’s more significant instruments measured on a nonrecurring basis at the lower of amortized cost or estimated fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
Loans Held for Sale: Loans held for sale, which consist generally of current production of certain fixed-rate, first-lien residential mortgage loans, are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The estimated fair value is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics, which the Corporation classifies as a Level 2 nonrecurring fair value measurement.
Impaired Loans: The Corporation considers a loan impaired when it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the note agreement, including principal and interest. Management has determined that commercial-oriented loan relationships that have nonaccrual status or have had their terms restructured meet this impaired loan definition, with the amount of impairment based upon the loan’s observable market price, the estimated fair value of the collateral for

28


Table of Contents

collateral-dependent loans, or alternatively, the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. The use of observable market price or estimated fair value of collateral on collateral-dependent loans is considered a fair value measurement subject to the fair value hierarchy. Appraised values are generally used on real estate collateral-dependent impaired loans, which the Corporation classifies as a Level 2 nonrecurring fair value measurement.
Mortgage servicing rights: Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. While sales of mortgage servicing rights do occur, the precise terms and conditions typically are not readily available to allow for a “quoted price for similar assets” comparison. Accordingly, the Corporation relies on an internal discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights. The Corporation uses a valuation model in conjunction with third party prepayment assumptions to project mortgage servicing rights cash flows based on the current interest rate scenario, which is then discounted to estimate an expected fair value of the mortgage servicing rights. The valuation model considers portfolio characteristics of the underlying mortgages, contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, discount rate assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenue, costs to service, and other economic factors. The Corporation reassesses and periodically adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the model to reflect market conditions and assumptions that a market participant would consider in valuing the mortgage servicing rights asset. In addition, the Corporation compares its fair value estimates and assumptions to observable market data for mortgage servicing rights, where available, and to recent market activity and actual portfolio experience. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, mortgage servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Corporation uses the amortization method (i.e., lower of amortized cost or estimated fair value measured on a nonrecurring basis), not fair value measurement accounting, for its mortgage servicing rights assets. See Note 7, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” for additional disclosure regarding the Corporation’s mortgage servicing rights.
The table below presents the Corporation’s investment securities available for sale, derivative financial instruments, and mortgage derivatives measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements Using
    September 30, 2009   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3
    ($ in Thousands)
Assets:
                               
Investment securities available for sale:
                               
U.S. Treasury securities
  $ 3,896     $ 3,896     $     $  
Federal agency securities
    44,630       44,630              
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
    900,606             900,606        
Residential mortgage-related securities
    4,656,204             4,656,204        
Other securities (debt and equity)
    45,740       24,486       21,154       100  
     
Total Investment securities available for sale
  $ 5,651,076     $ 73,012     $ 5,577,964     $ 100  
Derivatives (other assets)
    64,788             60,409       4,379  
 
                               
Liabilities:
                               
Derivatives (other liabilities)
  $ 72,891     $     $ 69,829     $ 3,062  

29


Table of Contents

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements Using
    December 31, 2008   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3
    ($ in Thousands)
Assets:
                               
Investment securities available for sale:
                               
U.S. Treasury securities
  $ 4,966     $ 4,966     $     $  
Federal agency securities
    77,010       77,010              
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
    925,603             925,603        
Residential mortgage-related securities
    4,077,431             4,077,431        
Other securities (debt and equity)
    58,404       31,710       26,694        
     
Total Investment securities available for sale
  $ 5,143,414     $ 113,686     $ 5,029,728     $  
Derivatives (other assets)
    83,626             76,996       6,630  
 
                               
Liabilities:
                               
Derivatives (other liabilities)
  $ 95,468     $     $ 92,968     $ 2,500  
The table below presents a rollforward of the balance sheet amounts for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the nine months ended September 30, 2009, for financial instruments measured on a recurring basis and classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
                 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value    
Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)    
($ in Thousands)   Investment    
    Securities    
    Available for Sale   Derivatives
     
Balance December 31, 2007
  $     $ (1,067 )
Total net gains included in income:
               
Mortgage derivative gain
          5,197  
     
Balance December 31, 2008
  $     $ 4,130  
Net transfer in
    2,000          
Total net losses included in income:
               
Net impairment losses on investment securities
    (1,900 )      
Mortgage derivative loss
          (2,813 )
     
Balance September 30, 2009
  $ 100     $ 1,317  
     
In valuing the $2 million investment security available for sale classified within Level 3, the Corporation incorporated its own assumptions about future cash flows and discount rates adjusting for credit and liquidity factors. The Corporation reviewed the underlying collateral and other relevant data in developing the assumptions for this investment security, and $0.9 million and $1.9 million credit-related other-than-temporary impairment was recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.

30


Table of Contents

The table below presents the Corporation’s loans held for sale, impaired loans, and mortgage servicing rights measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements Using
    September 30, 2009   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3
    ($ in Thousands)
Assets:
                               
Loans held for sale
  $ 78,740     $     $ 78,740     $  
Loans (1)
    451,805             451,805        
Mortgage servicing rights
    61,066                   61,066  
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements Using
    December 31, 2008   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3
    ($ in Thousands)
Assets:
                               
Loans held for sale
  $ 87,084     $     $ 87,084     $  
Loans (1)
    133,627             133,627        
Mortgage servicing rights
    45,568                   45,568  
 
(1)   Represents collateral-dependent impaired loans, net, which are included in loans.
Certain nonfinancial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include other real estate owned (upon initial recognition or subsequent impairment), nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a goodwill impairment test, and intangible assets and other nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment.
During the first nine months of 2009, certain other real estate owned, upon initial recognition, was re-measured and reported at fair value through a charge off to the allowance for loan losses based upon the estimated fair value of the other real estate owned. The fair value of other real estate owned, upon initial recognition, is estimated using appraised values, which the Corporation classifies as a Level 2 nonrecurring fair value measurement. Other real estate owned measured at fair value upon initial recognition totaled approximately $51 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. In addition to other real estate owned measured at fair value upon initial recognition, the Corporation also recorded write-downs to the balance of other real estate owned of $12 million to noninterest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

31


Table of Contents

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
The Corporation is required to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Corporation’s financial instruments.
The estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments on the balance sheet at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, were as follows:
                                 
    September 30, 2009   December 31, 2008
    Carrying           Carrying    
    Amount   Fair Value   Amount   Fair Value
    ($ in Thousands)
Financial assets:
                               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 430,381     $ 430,381     $ 533,338     $ 533,338  
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
    13,145       13,145       12,649       12,649  
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
    17,000       17,000       24,741       24,741  
Accrued interest receivable
    91,368       91,368       98,335       98,335  
Interest rate swap, cap, and collar agreements (1)
    59,324       59,324       75,576       75,576  
Foreign currency exchange forwards
    1,085       1,085       1,420       1,420  
Investment securities available for sale
    5,651,076       5,651,076       5,143,414       5,143,414  
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stocks
    181,316       181,316       206,003       206,003  
Loans held for sale
    78,740       78,745       87,084       87,161  
Loans, net
    14,353,067       13,073,453       16,018,530       15,527,838  
Bank owned life insurance
    517,485       517,485       510,663       510,663  
Financial liabilities:
                               
Deposits
    16,446,109       16,446,109       15,154,796       15,154,796  
Accrued interest payable
    19,734       19,734       31,947       31,947  
Short-term borrowings
    1,517,594       1,517,594       3,703,936       3,703,936  
Long-term funding
    1,761,506       1,857,330       1,861,647       1,981,566  
Interest rate swap, cap, and collar agreements (1)
    68,994       68,994       91,697       91,697  
Foreign currency exchange forwards
    835       835       1,271       1,271  
Standby letters of credit (2)
    3,338       3,338       3,672       3,672  
Commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale
    4,379       4,379       6,630       6,630  
Forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans
    (3,062 )     (3,062 )     (2,500 )     (2,500 )
     
 
(1)   At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the notional amount of non-trading interest rate swap agreements was $200 million and $400 million, respectively. See Note 11 for information on the fair value of derivative financial instruments.
 
(2)   The commitment on standby letters of credit was $0.5 billion and $0.6 billion at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. See Note 12 for additional information on the standby letters of credit and for information on the fair value of lending-related commitments.
Cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell, and accrued interest receivable - For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

32


Table of Contents

Investment securities available for sale — The fair value of investment securities available for sale is based on quoted prices in active markets, or if quoted prices are not available for a specific security, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows.
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stocks — The carrying amount is a reasonable fair value estimate for the Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stocks given their “restricted” nature (i.e., the stock can only be sold back to the respective institutions (Federal Home Loan Bank or Federal Reserve Bank) or another member institution at par).
Loans held for sale - Fair value is estimated using the prices of the Corporation’s existing commitments to sell such loans and/or the quoted market prices for commitments to sell similar loans.
Loans, net — Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, financial, and agricultural, real estate construction, commercial real estate, lease financing, residential mortgage, home equity, and other installment. The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for similar maturities.
Bank owned life insurance — The fair value of bank owned life insurance approximates the carrying amount, because upon liquidation of these investments, the Corporation would receive the cash surrender value which equals the carrying amount.
Deposits — The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings, interest-bearing demand deposits, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of the balance sheet date. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Accrued interest payable and short-term borrowings - For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Long-term funding — Rates currently available to the Corporation for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of existing borrowings.
Interest rate swap, cap, and collar agreements — The fair value of interest rate swap, cap, and collar agreements is determined using discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. The Corporation also incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.
Foreign currency exchange forwards — The fair value of the Corporation’s foreign exchange forwards is determined using quoted prices of foreign exchange forwards with similar characteristics, with consideration given to the nature of the quote and the relationship of recently evidenced market activity to the fair value estimate.
Standby letters of credit — The fair value of standby letters of credit represent deferred fees arising from the related off-balance sheet financial instruments. These deferred fees approximate the fair value of these instruments and are based on several factors, including the remaining terms of the agreement and the credit standing of the customer.

33


Table of Contents

Commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale — The fair value of commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale is estimated by comparing the Corporation’s cost to acquire mortgages and the current price for similar mortgage loans, taking into account the terms of the commitments and the creditworthiness of the counterparties.
Forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans — The fair value of forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans is the estimated amount that the Corporation would receive or pay to terminate the forward delivery contract at the reporting date based on market prices for similar financial instruments.
Limitations — Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Corporation’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Corporation’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
NOTE 14: Retirement Plans
The Corporation has a noncontributory defined benefit retirement plan (the Retirement Account Plan (“RAP”)) covering substantially all full-time employees. The benefits are based primarily on years of service and the employee’s compensation paid. Employees of acquired entities generally participate in the RAP after consummation of the business combinations. The plans of acquired entities are typically merged into the RAP after completion of the mergers, and credit is usually given to employees for years of service at the acquired institution for vesting and eligibility purposes. The RAP and a smaller acquired plan that was frozen in December 31, 2004, are collectively referred to below as the “Pension Plan.”
Associated also provides access to healthcare benefits for eligible retired employees in its Postretirement Plan (the “Postretirement Plan”). Retirees who are at least 55 years of age with 10 years of service are eligible to participate in the plan. The Corporation has no plan assets attributable to the plan, and funds the benefits as claims arise. The Corporation reserves the right to terminate or make changes to the plan at any time.

34


Table of Contents

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the Pension and Postretirement Plans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and for the full year 2008 were as follows.
                                         
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended   Year Ended
    September 30,   September 30,   December 31,
    2009   2008   2009   2008   2008
    ($ in Thousands)
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost                                
Pension Plan:
                                       
Service cost
  $ 2,100     $ 2,488     $ 6,300     $ 7,463     $ 9,362  
Interest cost
    1,547       1,560       4,643       4,680       6,174  
Expected return on plan assets
    (2,885 )     (2,923 )     (8,655 )     (8,768 )     (11,768 )
Amortization of prior service cost
    18       20       52       60       77  
Amortization of actuarial loss
    90       75       270       225       258  
     
Total net periodic benefit cost
    870       1,220       2,610       3,660       4,103  
Settlement charge
                            267  
     
Total net pension cost
  $ 870     $ 1,220     $ 2,610     $ 3,660     $ 4,370  
     
 
                                       
Postretirement Plan:
                                       
Interest cost
  $ 66     $ 76     $ 199     $ 229     $ 271  
Amortization of prior service cost
    99       99       296       296       395  
Amortization of actuarial gain
    (13 )           (37 )           (27 )
     
Total net periodic benefit cost
  $ 152     $ 175     $ 458     $ 525     $ 639  
     
The Corporation’s funding policy is to pay at least the minimum amount required by the funding requirements of federal law and regulations, with consideration given to the maximum funding amounts allowed. The Corporation contributed $10 million to its Pension Plan during the first nine months of 2009, and as of September 30, 2009, does not expect to make additional contributions for the remainder of 2009. The Corporation regularly reviews the funding of its Pension Plan.

35


Table of Contents

NOTE 15: Segment Reporting
Selected financial and descriptive information is required to be provided about reportable operating segments, considering a “management approach” concept as the basis for identifying reportable segments. The management approach is to be based on the way that management organizes the segments within the enterprise for making operating decisions, allocating resources, and assessing performance. Consequently, the segments are evident from the structure of the enterprise’s internal organization, focusing on financial information that an enterprise’s chief operating decision-makers use to make decisions about the enterprise’s operating matters.
The Corporation’s primary segment is banking, conducted through its bank and lending subsidiaries. For purposes of segment disclosure, these entities have been combined as one segment that have similar economic characteristics and the nature of their products, services, processes, customers, delivery channels, and regulatory environment are similar. Banking consists of lending and deposit gathering (as well as other banking-related products and services) to businesses, governmental units, and consumers (including mortgages, home equity lending, and card products) and the support to deliver, fund, and manage such banking services.
The wealth management segment provides products and a variety of fiduciary, investment management, advisory, and Corporate agency services to assist customers in building, investing, or protecting their wealth, including insurance, brokerage, and trust/asset management. The other segment includes intersegment eliminations and residual revenues and expenses, representing the difference between actual amounts incurred and the amounts allocated to operating segments.

36


Table of Contents

Selected segment information is presented below.
                                 
            Wealth        
    Banking   Management   Other   Consolidated Total
    ($ in Thousands)
As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
                               
Net interest income
  $ 547,028     $ 624     $     $ 547,652  
Provision for loan losses
    355,856                   355,856  
Noninterest income
    211,818       71,649       (3,180 )     280,287  
Depreciation and amortization
    40,304       988             41,292  
Other noninterest expense
    368,469       59,885       (3,180 )     425,174  
Income taxes
    (40,321 )     4,560             (35,761 )
     
Net income
  $ 34,538     $ 6,840     $     $ 41,378  
     
 
                               
% of consolidated net income
    83 %     17 %     %     100 %
Total assets
  $ 22,823,731     $ 125,384     $ (67,588 )   $ 22,881,527  
     
% of consolidated total assets
    100 %     %     %     100 %
Total revenues *
  $ 758,846     $ 72,273     $ (3,180 )   $ 827,939  
% of consolidated total revenues
    92 %     8 %     %     100 %
 
                               
As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
                               
Net interest income
  $ 503,803     $ 563     $     $ 504,366  
Provision for loan losses
    137,014                   137,014  
Noninterest income
    179,681       79,653       (2,888 )     256,446  
Depreciation and amortization
    36,553       1,116             37,669  
Other noninterest expense
    326,356       59,443       (2,888 )     382,911  
Income taxes
    43,762       7,863             51,625  
     
Net income
  $ 139,799     $ 11,794     $     $ 151,593  
     
% of consolidated net income
    92 %     8 %     %     100 %
Total assets
  $ 22,426,650     $ 125,181     $ (64,437 )   $ 22,487,394  
     
% of consolidated total assets
    100 %     %     %     100 %
Total revenues *
  $ 683,484     $ 80,216     $ (2,888 )   $ 760,812  
% of consolidated total revenues
    90 %     10 %     %     100 %
 
*   Total revenues for this segment disclosure are defined to be the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income, net of mortgage servicing rights amortization.

37


Table of Contents

                                 
            Wealth        
    Banking   Management   Other   Consolidated Total
            ($ in Thousands)        
As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2009
                               
 
                               
Net interest income
  $ 179,042     $ 194     $     $ 179,236  
Provision for loan losses
    95,410                   95,410  
Noninterest income
    57,668       24,008       (1,060 )     80,616  
Depreciation and amortization
    13,982       325             14,307  
Other noninterest expense
    113,703       19,468       (1,060 )     132,111  
Income taxes
    266       1,764             2,030  
     
Net income
  $ 13,349     $ 2,645     $     $ 15,994  
     
% of consolidated net income
    83 %     17 %     %     100 %
 
                               
Total assets
  $ 22,823,731     $ 125,384     $ (67,588 )   $ 22,881,527  
     
% of consolidated total assets
    100 %     %     %     100 %
 
                               
Total revenues *
  $ 236,710     $ 24,202     $ (1,060 )   $ 259,852  
% of consolidated total revenues
    91 %     9 %     %     100 %
 
                               
As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2008
                               
 
                               
Net interest income
  $ 166,301     $ 216     $     $ 166,517  
Provision for loan losses
    55,011                   55,011  
Noninterest income
    53,832       26,537       (962 )     79,407  
Depreciation and amortization
    12,904       354             13,258  
Other noninterest expense
    108,543       19,822       (962 )     127,403  
Income taxes
    9,852       2,631             12,483  
     
Net income
  $ 33,823     $ 3,946     $     $ 37,769  
     
% of consolidated net income
    90 %     10 %     %     100 %
 
                               
Total assets
  $ 22,426,650     $ 125,181     $ (64,437 )   $ 22,487,394  
     
% of consolidated total assets
    100 %     %     %     100 %
 
                               
Total revenues *
  $ 220,133     $ 26,753     $ (962 )   $ 245,924  
% of consolidated total revenues
    90 %     10 %     %     100 %
 
*   Total revenues for this segment disclosure are defined to be the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income, net of mortgage servicing rights amortization.
NOTE 16: Subsequent Event — Recent Regulatory Developments
On November 5, 2009, Associated Bank, National Association (the “Bank”) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), its primary banking regulator. The MOU, which is an informal agreement between the Bank and the OCC, requires the Bank to develop, implement, and maintain various processes to improve the Bank’s risk management of its loan portfolio and a three year capital plan providing for maintenance of specified capital levels discussed below, notification to the OCC of dividends proposed to be paid to the Corporation and the commitment of the Corporation to act as a primary or contingent source of the Bank’s capital. Management believes that it has satisfied a number of the conditions of the MOU and has commenced the steps necessary to resolve any and all remaining matters presented therein. The Bank has also agreed with the OCC that beginning March 31, 2010, until the MOU is no longer in effect, to maintain minimum capital ratios at specified levels higher than those otherwise required by applicable regulations as follows: Tier 1 capital to total average assets (leverage ratio)—8% and total capital to risk-weighted assets—12%. At September 30, 2009, the Bank’s capital ratios were 8.33% and 13.11%, respectively.

38


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Statements made in this document and in documents that are incorporated by reference which are not purely historical are forward-looking statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including any statements regarding descriptions of management’s plans, objectives, or goals for future operations, products or services, and forecasts of its revenues, earnings, or other measures of performance. Forward-looking statements are based on current management expectations and, by their nature, are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements may be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “estimate,” “should,” “will,” “intend,” or similar expressions.
Shareholders should note that many factors, some of which are discussed elsewhere in this document and in the documents that are incorporated by reference, could affect the future financial results of the Corporation and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference in this document. These factors, many of which are beyond the Corporation’s control, include the following:
  §   operating, legal, and regulatory risks;
 
  §   economic, political, and competitive forces affecting the Corporation’s banking, securities, asset management, insurance, and credit services businesses;
 
  §   integration risks related to acquisitions;
 
  §   impact on net interest income from changes in monetary policy and general economic conditions; and
 
  §   the risk that the Corporation’s analyses of these risks and forces could be incorrect and/or that the strategies developed to address them could be unsuccessful.
These factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. The Corporation undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Overview
The following discussion and analysis is presented to assist in the understanding and evaluation of the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. It is intended to complement the unaudited consolidated financial statements, footnotes, and supplemental financial data appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction therewith.
Critical Accounting Policies
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include the determination of the allowance for loan losses, mortgage servicing rights valuation, derivative financial instruments and hedging activities, and income taxes.
The consolidated financial statements of the Corporation are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and follow general practices within the industries in which it operates. This preparation requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this

39


Table of Contents

information changes, actual results could differ from the estimates, assumptions, and judgments reflected in the financial statements. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Management believes the following policies are both important to the portrayal of the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations and require subjective or complex judgments and, therefore, management considers the following to be critical accounting policies. The critical accounting policies are discussed directly with the Audit Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors.
Allowance for Loan Losses: Management’s evaluation process used to determine the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses is subject to the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments. The evaluation process combines several factors: management’s ongoing review and grading of the loan portfolio, consideration of historical loan loss and delinquency experience, trends in past due and nonperforming loans, risk characteristics of the various classifications of loans, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing economic conditions, the fair value of underlying collateral, and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect probable credit losses. Because current economic conditions can change and future events are inherently difficult to predict, the anticipated amount of estimated loan losses, and therefore the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses, could change significantly. As an integral part of their examination process, various regulatory agencies also review the allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require that certain loan balances be classified differently or charged off when their credit evaluations differ from those of management, based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. The Corporation believes the level of the allowance for loan losses is appropriate as recorded in the consolidated financial statements. See section “Allowance for Loan Losses.”
Mortgage Servicing Rights Valuation: The fair value of the Corporation’s mortgage servicing rights asset is important to the presentation of the consolidated financial statements since the mortgage servicing rights are carried on the consolidated balance sheet at the lower of amortized cost or estimated fair value. Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active open market with readily observable prices. As such, like other participants in the mortgage banking business, the Corporation relies on an internal discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights. The use of an internal discounted cash flow model involves judgment, particularly of estimated prepayment speeds of underlying mortgages serviced and the overall level of interest rates. Loan type and note interest rate are the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans used to stratify capitalized mortgage servicing rights for purposes of measuring impairment. The Corporation periodically reviews the assumptions underlying the valuation of mortgage servicing rights. In addition, the Corporation consults periodically with third parties as to the assumptions used and to determine that the Corporation’s valuation is consistent with the third party valuation. While the Corporation believes that the values produced by its internal model are indicative of the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights portfolio, these values can change significantly depending upon key factors, such as the then current interest rate environment, estimated prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgages serviced, and other economic conditions. The proceeds that might be received should the Corporation actually consider a sale of some or all of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio could differ from the amounts reported at any point in time.
Mortgage servicing rights are carried at the lower of amortized cost or estimated fair value and are assessed for impairment at each reporting date. Impairment is assessed based on the fair value at each reporting date using estimated prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgage loans serviced and stratifications based on the risk characteristics of the underlying loans (predominantly loan type and note interest rate). As mortgage interest rates fall, prepayment speeds are usually faster and the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset generally decreases, requiring additional valuation reserve. Conversely, as mortgage interest

40


Table of Contents

rates rise, prepayment speeds are usually slower and the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset generally increases, requiring less valuation reserve. However, the extent to which interest rates impact the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset depends, in part, on the magnitude of the changes in market interest rates and the differential between the then current market interest rates for mortgage loans and the mortgage interest rates included in the mortgage servicing portfolio. Management recognizes that the volatility in the valuation of the mortgage servicing rights asset will continue. To better understand the sensitivity of the impact of prepayment speeds on the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset at September 30, 2009 (holding all other factors unchanged), if prepayment speeds were to increase 25%, the estimated value of the mortgage servicing rights asset would have been approximately $5.2 million lower, while if prepayment speeds were to decrease 25%, the estimated value of the mortgage servicing rights asset would have been approximately $4.8 million higher. The Corporation believes the mortgage servicing rights asset is properly recorded in the consolidated financial statements. See Note 7, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” and Note 13, “Fair Value Measurements,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements and section “Noninterest Income.”
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities: In various aspects of its business, the Corporation uses derivative financial instruments to modify exposures to changes in interest rates and market prices for other financial instruments. Derivative instruments are required to be carried at fair value on the balance sheet with changes in the fair value recorded directly in earnings. To qualify for and maintain hedge accounting, the Corporation must meet formal documentation and effectiveness evaluation requirements both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis. The application of the hedge accounting policy requires strict adherence to documentation and effectiveness testing requirements, judgment in the assessment of hedge effectiveness, identification of similar hedged item groupings, and measurement of changes in the fair value of hedged items. If in the future derivative financial instruments used by the Corporation no longer qualify for hedge accounting, the impact on the consolidated results of operations and reported earnings could be significant. When hedge accounting is discontinued, the Corporation would continue to carry the derivative on the balance sheet at its fair value; however, for a cash flow derivative, changes in its fair value would be recorded in earnings instead of through other comprehensive income, and for a fair value derivative, the changes in fair value of the hedged asset or liability would no longer be recorded through earnings. See Note 11, “Derivative and Hedging Activities,” and Note 13, “Fair Value Measurements,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Income Taxes: The assessment of tax assets and liabilities involves the use of estimates, assumptions, interpretations, and judgment concerning certain accounting pronouncements and federal and state tax codes. There can be no assurance that future events, such as court decisions or positions of federal and state taxing authorities, will not differ from management’s current assessment, the impact of which could be significant to the consolidated results of operations and reported earnings. The Corporation believes the tax assets and liabilities are appropriate and properly recorded in the consolidated financial statements. See Note 10, “Income Taxes,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements and section “Income Taxes.”
Segment Review
As described in Note 15, “Segment Reporting,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements, the Corporation’s primary reportable segment is banking. Banking consists of lending and deposit gathering (as well as other banking-related products and services) to businesses, governmental units, and consumers (including mortgages, home equity lending, and card products), and the support to deliver, fund, and manage such banking services. The Corporation’s wealth management segment provides products and a variety of fiduciary, investment management, advisory, and Corporate agency services to assist customers in building, investing, or protecting their wealth, including insurance, brokerage, and trust/asset management.

41


Table of Contents

Note 15, “Segment Reporting,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements, indicates that the banking segment represents 83% of consolidated net income and 92% of total revenues (as defined in the Note) for the first nine months of 2009. The Corporation’s profitability is predominantly dependent on net interest income, noninterest income, the level of the provision for loan losses, noninterest expense, and taxes of its banking segment. The consolidated discussion therefore predominantly describes the banking segment results. The critical accounting policies primarily affect the banking segment, with the exception of income tax accounting, which affects both the banking and wealth management segments (see section “Critical Accounting Policies”).
The contribution from the wealth management segment to consolidated net income (as defined and disclosed in Note 15, “Segment Reporting,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements) was approximately 17% and 8%, respectively, for the comparable year-to-date periods in 2009 and 2008. Wealth management segment revenues were down $7.9 million (10%) and expenses were up $0.3 million (1%) between the comparable nine-month periods of 2009 and 2008. Wealth segment assets (which consist predominantly of cash equivalents, investments, customer receivables, goodwill and intangibles) were up $0.2 million between September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, predominantly due to higher cash and cash equivalents, partially offset by lower customer receivables. The major components of wealth management revenues are trust fees, insurance fees and commissions, and brokerage commissions, which are individually discussed in section “Noninterest Income.” The major expenses for the wealth management segment are personnel expense (63% and 66%, respectively, of total segment noninterest expense for the first nine months of 2009 and the comparable period in 2008), as well as occupancy, processing, and other costs, which are covered generally in the consolidated discussion in section “Noninterest Expense.”
Results of Operations — Summary
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, totaled $41.4 million, or $0.15 for both basic and diluted earnings per common share. Comparatively, net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, totaled $151.6 million, or $1.19 and $1.18 for basic and diluted earnings per common share, respectively. For the first nine months of 2009, the annualized return on average assets was 0.23% and the annualized return on average equity was 1.90%, compared to 0.93% and 8.57%, respectively, for the comparable period in 2008. The net interest margin for the first nine months of 2009 was 3.50% compared to 3.57% for the first nine months of 2008.

42


Table of Contents

TABLE 1
Summary Results of Operations: Trends
($ in Thousands, except per share data)
                                         
    3rd Qtr.   2nd Qtr.   1st Qtr.   4th Qtr.   3rd Qtr.
    2009   2009   2009   2008   2008
 
Net income (loss) (Quarter)
  $ 15,994     $ (17,341 )   $ 42,725     $ 16,859     $ 37,769  
Net income (Year-to-date)
    41,378       25,384       42,725       168,452       151,593  
 
                                       
Net income (loss) available to common equity (Quarter)
  $ 8,652     $ (24,672 )   $ 35,404     $ 13,609     $ 37,769  
Net income available to common equity (Year-to-date)
    19,384       10,732       35,404       165,202       151,593  
 
                                       
Earnings (loss) per common share — basic (Quarter)
  $ 0.07     $ (0.19 )   $ 0.28     $ 0.11     $ 0.30  
Earnings per common share — basic (Year-to-date)
    0.15       0.08       0.28       1.30       1.19  
 
                                       
Earnings (loss) per common share — diluted (Quarter)
  $ 0.07     $ (0.19 )   $ 0.28     $ 0.11     $ 0.30  
Earnings per common share — diluted (Year-to-date)
    0.15       0.08       0.28       1.29       1.18  
 
                                       
Return on average assets (Quarter)
    0.27 %     (0.29 )%     0.71 %     0.30 %     0.68 %
Return on average assets (Year-to-date)
    0.23       0.21       0.71       0.76       0.93  
 
                                       
Return on average equity (Quarter)
    2.19 %     (2.40 )%     5.98 %     2.58 %     6.38 %
Return on average equity (Year-to-date)
    1.90       1.76       5.98       6.95       8.57  
 
                                       
Return on average common equity (Quarter)
    1.43 %     (4.12 )%     6.00 %     2.28 %     6.38 %
Return on average common equity (Year-to-date)
    1.08       0.90       6.00       6.98       8.57  
 
                                       
Return on average tangible common equity (Quarter) (1)
    2.39 %     (6.88 )%     10.05 %     3.83 %     10.83 %
Return on average tangible common equity (Year-to-date) (1)
    1.81       1.51       10.05       11.81       14.52  
 
                                       
Efficiency ratio (Quarter) (2)
    55.43 %     60.20 %     52.78 %     55.47 %     53.47 %
Efficiency ratio (Year-to-date) (2)
    56.22       56.59       52.78       53.90       53.34  
 
                                       
Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent (Quarter) (2)
    54.14 %     58.65 %     51.31 %     53.87 %     52.18 %
Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent (Year-to-date) (2)
    54.78       55.08       51.31       52.41       51.89  
 
                                       
Net interest margin (Quarter)
    3.50 %     3.40 %     3.59 %     3.88 %     3.48 %
Net interest margin (Year-to-date)
    3.50       3.49       3.59       3.65       3.57  
 
(1)   Return on average tangible common equity = Net income available to common equity divided by average common equity excluding average goodwill and other intangible assets (net of mortgage servicing rights). This is a non-GAAP financial measure.
 
(2)   See Table 1A for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure.
TABLE 1A
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measure
                                         
    3rd Qtr.   2nd Qtr.   1st Qtr.   4th Qtr.   3rd Qtr.
    2009   2009   2009   2008   2008
 
Efficiency ratio (Quarter) (a)
    55.43 %     60.20 %     52.78 %     55.47 %     53.47 %
Taxable equivalent adjustment (Quarter)
    (1.27 )     (1.30 )     (1.26 )     (1.40 )     (1.40 )
Asset sale gains / losses, net (Quarter)
    (0.02 )     (0.25 )     (0.21 )     (0.20 )     0.11  
 
                                       
Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent (Quarter) (b)
    54.14 %     58.65 %     51.31 %     53.87 %     52.18 %
 
                                       
Efficiency ratio (Year-to-date) (a)
    56.22 %     56.59 %     52.78 %     53.90 %     53.34 %
Taxable equivalent adjustment (Year-to-date)
    (1.28 )     (1.28 )     (1.26 )     (1.41 )     (1.41 )
Asset sale gains / losses, net (Year-to-date)
    (0.16 )     (0.23 )     (0.21 )     (0.08 )     (0.04 )
 
                                       
Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent (Year-to-date) (b)
    54.78 %     55.08 %     51.31 %     52.41 %     51.89 %
 
(a)   Efficiency ratio is defined by the Federal Reserve guidance as noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding investment securities gains/losses, net.
 
(b)   Efficiency ratio, fully taxable equivalent, is noninterest expense divided by the sum of taxable equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding investment securities gains/losses, net and asset sale gains/losses, net. This efficiency ratio is presented on a taxable equivalent basis, which adjusts net interest income for the tax-favored status of certain loan and investment securities. Management believes this measure to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income as it enhances the comparability of net interest income arising from taxable and tax-exempt sources and it excludes certain specific revenue items (such as investment securities gains/losses, net and asset sale gains/losses, net).

43


Table of Contents

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, was $566.3 million, an increase of $41.1 million or 7.8% versus the comparable period last year. As indicated in Tables 2 and 3, the increase in taxable equivalent net interest income was attributable to favorable volume variances (as changes in the balances and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities added $62.2 million to taxable equivalent net interest income), partially offset by unfavorable rate variances (as the impact of changes in the interest rate environment and product pricing reduced taxable equivalent net interest income by $21.1 million).
The net interest margin for the first nine months of 2009 was 3.50%, 7 bp lower than 3.57% for the same period in 2008. This comparable period decrease was a function of a 12 bp lower contribution from net free funds (due principally to lower rates on interest-bearing liabilities reducing the value of noninterest-bearing deposits and other net free funds), net of a 5 bp increase in interest rate spread. The improvement in interest rate spread was the net result of a 120 bp decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities and a 115 bp decrease in the yield on earning assets.
While unchanged during the first nine months of 2009, the Federal Reserve lowered interest rates seven times (for a total interest rate reduction of 400 bp) during 2008, resulting in a level Federal funds rate of 0.25% for the first nine months of 2009, 218 bp lower than the average Federal funds rate of 2.43% during the first nine months of 2008. The Corporation expects the net interest margin to remain stable for the remainder of 2009. The net interest margin is at risk to changes in various other factors, such as the slope of the yield curve, competitive pricing pressures, changes in the balance sheet mix from management action and/or from customer behavior relative to loan or deposit products.
The yield on earning assets was 4.75% for the first nine months of 2009, 115 bp lower than the comparable period last year, attributable principally to loan yields (down 116 bp, to 4.88%). Commercial and retail loans, in particular, experienced lower yields (down 132 bp and 113 bp, respectively) due to the repricing of adjustable rate loans and competitive pricing pressures in a declining rate environment, as well as the impact of higher levels of nonaccrual loans. The yield on securities and short-term investments decreased 90 bp (to 4.39%), also impacted by the lower rate environment and prepayment speeds of mortgage-related investment securities purchased at a premium.
The rate on interest-bearing liabilities of 1.51% for the first nine months of 2009 was 120 bp lower than the same period in 2008. Rates on interest-bearing deposits were down 114 bp (to 1.33%, reflecting the lower rate environment, yet moderated by product-focused pricing to retain balances), while the cost of wholesale funds decreased 123 bp (to 1.97%). The cost of short-term borrowings was down 192 bp (similar to the year-over-year decrease in average Federal funds rates), while the cost of long-term funding declined modestly (down 72 bp).
Year-over-year changes in the average balance sheet were impacted by the preferred stock issuance of $525 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the levering of the balance sheet through the investment in mortgage-related securities. Average earning assets were $21.6 billion for the first nine months of 2009, an increase of $2.0 billion or 10.1% from the comparable period last year, with average securities and short-term investments up $2.1 billion (primarily mortgage-related securities) while average loans were down $0.1 billion. The decline in average loans was comprised of a $518 million decrease in commercial loans, partially offset by a $264 million increase in residential mortgages and a $172 million increase in retail loans.
Average interest-bearing liabilities of $18.0 billion for the first nine months of 2009 were $1.1 billion or 6.4% higher than the first nine months of 2008. On average, interest-bearing deposits grew $1.8 billion (primarily attributable to $0.8 billion higher network transaction deposits, $0.5 billion higher money market, and $0.3 billion higher brokered CDs), while noninterest-bearing demand deposits (a principal component of net free funds) were up $0.4 billion. Average wholesale funding balances decreased $0.7 billion between the comparable nine-month periods, with short-term borrowing lower by $1.0 billion and long-term funding higher

44


Table of Contents

by $0.3 billion. As a percentage of total average interest-bearing liabilities, wholesale funding declined from 33.8% for the first nine months of 2008 to 27.8% for the first nine months of 2009.
TABLE 2
Net Interest Income Analysis
($ in Thousands)
                                                 
    Nine months ended September 30,        
    2009     Nine months ended September 30, 2008  
            Interest     Average             Interest     Average  
    Average     Income/     Yield/     Average     Income/     Yield/  
    Balance     Expense     Rate     Balance     Expense     Rate  
 
Earning assets:
                                               
Loans: (1) (2) (3)
                                               
Commercial
  $ 9,887,868     $ 334,930       4.53 %   $ 10,405,893     $ 455,899       5.85 %
Residential mortgage
    2,457,663       98,159       5.33       2,193,992       97,776       5.95  
Retail
    3,583,909       149,098       5.56       3,411,742       170,962       6.69  
                         
Total loans
    15,929,440       582,187       4.88       16,011,627       724,637       6.04  
Investments and other (1)
    5,690,398       187,491       4.39       3,627,702       144,012       5.29  
                         
Total earning assets
    21,619,838       769,678       4.75       19,639,329       868,649       5.90  
Other assets, net
    2,271,326                       2,194,335                  
 
                                           
Total assets
  $ 23,891,164                     $ 21,833,664                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                               
Interest-bearing deposits:
                                               
Savings deposits
  $ 884,098     $ 1,034       0.16 %   $ 894,389     $ 3,118       0.47 %
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    2,002,929       3,164       0.21       1,791,808       13,131       0.98  
Money market deposits
    5,300,646       34,516       0.87       4,010,968       61,577       2.05  
Time deposits, excluding Brokered CDs
    3,951,577       82,275       2.78       3,959,126       115,830       3.91  
                         
Total interest-bearing deposits, excluding Brokered CDs
    12,139,250       120,989       1.33       10,656,291       193,656       2.43  
Brokered CDs
    848,538       8,414       1.33       540,689       13,248       3.27  
                         
Total interest-bearing deposits
    12,987,788       129,403       1.33       11,196,980       206,904       2.47  
Wholesale funding
    5,006,918       73,991       1.97       5,707,467       136,570       3.20  
                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    17,994,706       203,394       1.51       16,904,447       343,474       2.71  
 
                                           
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
    2,820,289                       2,419,154                  
Other liabilities
    171,648                       147,030                  
Stockholders’ equity
    2,904,521                       2,363,033                  
 
                                           
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 23,891,164                     $ 21,833,664                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Interest rate spread
                    3.24 %                     3.19 %
Net free funds
                    0.26                       0.38  
 
                                           
Net interest income, taxable equivalent, and net interest margin
          $ 566,284       3.50 %           $ 525,175       3.57 %
                         
Taxable equivalent adjustment
            18,632                       20,809          
 
                                           
Net interest income
          $ 547,652                     $ 504,366          
 
                                           
 
(1)   The yield on tax exempt loans and securities is computed on a taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35% for all periods presented and is net of the effects of certain disallowed interest deductions.
 
(2)   Nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale have been included in the average balances.
 
(3)   Interest income includes net loan fees.

45


Table of Contents

TABLE 2
Net Interest Income Analysis
($ in Thousands)
                                                 
    Three months ended September 30, 2009     Three months ended September 30, 2008  
            Interest     Average             Interest     Average  
    Average     Income/     Yield/     Average     Income/     Yield/  
    Balance     Expense     Rate     Balance     Expense     Rate  
 
Earning assets:
                                               
Loans: (1) (2) (3)
                                               
Commercial
  $ 9,503,565     $ 106,506       4.45 %   $ 10,393,313     $ 141,040       5.40 %
Residential mortgage
    2,270,025       29,928       5.26       2,151,163       31,452       5.84  
Retail
    3,475,305       47,670       5.46       3,659,241       57,477       6.26  
                         
Total loans
    15,248,895       184,104       4.80       16,203,717       229,969       5.65  
Investments and other (1)
    5,814,121       60,485       4.16       3,680,717       48,306       5.25  
                         
Total earning assets
    21,063,016       244,589       4.62       19,884,434       278,275       5.58  
Other assets, net
    2,299,938                       2,188,514                  
 
                                           
Total assets
  $ 23,362,954                     $ 22,072,948                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                               
Interest-bearing deposits:
                                               
Savings deposits
  $ 887,176     $ 353       0.16 %   $ 911,216     $ 1,027       0.45 %
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    2,330,976       1,298       0.22       1,771,091       3,366       0.76  
Money market deposits
    5,540,272       10,538       0.75       4,191,771       19,577       1.86  
Time deposits, excluding Brokered CDs
    3,847,942       23,998       2.47       3,941,384       34,860       3.52  
                         
Total interest-bearing deposits, excluding Brokered CDs
    12,606,366       36,187       1.14       10,815,462       58,830       2.16  
Brokered CDs
    738,145       1,624       0.87       416,038       2,913       2.79  
                         
Total interest-bearing deposits
    13,344,511       37,811       1.12       11,231,500       61,743       2.19  
Wholesale funding
    4,067,830       21,604       2.11       5,876,051       43,116       2.92  
                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    17,412,341       59,415       1.36       17,107,551       104,859       2.44  
 
                                           
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
    2,919,670                       2,478,797                  
Other liabilities
    126,733                       132,994                  
Stockholders’ equity
    2,904,210                       2,353,606                  
 
                                           
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 23,362,954                     $ 22,072,948                  
 
                                           
Interest rate spread
                    3.26 %                     3.14 %
Net free funds
                    0.24                       0.34  
 
                                           
Net interest income, taxable equivalent, and net interest margin
          $ 185,174       3.50 %           $ 173,416       3.48 %
                         
Taxable equivalent adjustment
            5,938                       6,899          
 
                                           
Net interest income
          $ 179,236                     $ 166,517          
 
                                           
 
(1)   The yield on tax exempt loans and securities is computed on a taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35% for all periods presented and is net of the effects of certain disallowed interest deductions.
 
(2)   Nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale have been included in the average balances.
 
(3)   Interest income includes net loan fees.

46


Table of Contents

TABLE 3
Volume / Rate Variance — Taxable Equivalent Basis
($ in Thousands)
                                                   
    Comparison of     Comparison of
    Nine months ended Sept 30, 2009 versus 2008     Three months ended Sept 30, 2009 versus 2008
            Variance Attributable to             Variance Attributable to
    Income/Expense                     Income/Expense        
    Variance (1)   Volume   Rate     Variance (1)   Volume   Rate
       
INTEREST INCOME: (2)
                                                 
Loans:
                                                 
Commercial
  $ (120,969 )   $ (21,819 )   $ (99,150 )     $ (34,534 )   $ (11,294 )   $ (23,240 )
Residential mortgage
    383       11,100       (10,717 )       (1,524 )     1,676       (3,200 )
Retail
    (21,864 )     8,247       (30,111 )       (9,807 )     (2,762 )     (7,045 )
           
Total loans
    (142,450 )     (2,472 )     (139,978 )       (45,865 )     (12,380 )     (33,485 )
Investments and other
    43,479       71,654       (28,175 )       12,179       24,006       (11,827 )
           
Total interest income
    (98,971 )     69,182       (168,153 )       (33,686 )     11,626       (45,312 )
INTEREST EXPENSE:
                                                 
Interest-bearing deposits:
                                                 
Savings deposits
    (2,084 )     (36 )     (2,048 )       (674 )     (27 )     (647 )
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    (9,967 )     1,385       (11,352 )       (2,068 )     837       (2,905 )
Money market deposits
    (27,061 )     15,681       (42,742 )       (9,039 )     5,016       (14,055 )
Time deposits, excluding brokered CDs
    (33,555 )     (221 )     (33,334 )       (10,862 )     (803 )     (10,059 )
           
Interest-bearing deposits, excluding Brokered CDs
    (72,667 )     16,809       (89,476 )       (22,643 )     5,023       (27,666 )
Brokered CDs
    (4,834 )     5,338       (10,172 )       (1,289 )     1,443       (2,732 )
           
Total interest-bearing deposits
    (77,501 )     22,147       (99,648 )       (23,932 )     6,466       (30,398 )
Wholesale funding
    (62,579 )     (15,212 )     (47,367 )       (21,512 )     (11,326 )     (10,186 )
           
Total interest expense
    (140,080 )     6,935       (147,015 )       (45,444 )     (4,860 )     (40,584 )
           
Net interest income, taxable equivalent
  $ 41,109     $ 62,247     $ (21,138 )     $ 11,758     $ 16,486     $ (4,728 )
           
 
(1)   The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated proportionately to volume variance and rate variance based on the relationship of the absolute dollar change in each.
 
(2)   The yield on tax-exempt loans and securities is computed on a taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 35% for all periods presented.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses for the first nine months of 2009 was $355.9 million, compared to $137.0 million for the first nine months of 2008 and $202.1 million for the full year 2008. Net charge offs were $208.7 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared to $91.4 million for the first nine months of 2008 and $137.3 million for full year 2008. Annualized net charge offs as a percent of average loans for the first nine months of 2009 were 1.75%, compared to 0.76% for the first nine months of 2008 and 0.85% for full year 2008. At September 30, 2009, the allowance for loan losses was $412.5 million, up from $246.2 million at September 30, 2008, and up from $265.4 million at December 31, 2008. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 2.79%, compared to 1.51% at September 30, 2008 and 1.63% at December 31, 2008. Nonperforming loans at September 30, 2009, were $886 million, compared to $305 million at September 30, 2008, and $341 million at December 31, 2008. See Tables 8 and 9.
The provision for loan losses is predominantly a function of the Corporation’s reserving methodology and judgments as to other qualitative and quantitative factors used to determine the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses which focuses on changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio, changes in levels of impaired and other nonperforming loans, historical losses and delinquencies on each portfolio category, the risk inherent in specific loans, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing economic conditions, the fair value of underlying collateral, and other factors which could affect

47


Table of Contents

potential credit losses. See additional discussion under sections “Allowance for Loan Losses,” and “Nonperforming Loans and Other Real Estate Owned.”
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income for the first nine months of 2009 was $266.2 million, up $21.7 million (8.9%) from the first nine months of 2008. Core fee-based revenue (as defined in Table 4 below) was $192.8 million, down $8.1 million (4.0%) from the comparable period last year. Net mortgage banking income was $31.7 million compared to $15.9 million for the first nine months of 2008. Net gains / losses on investment securities was $9.2 million, a favorable change of $26.4 million versus the comparable period in 2008. All other noninterest income categories combined were $32.5 million, down $12.4 million versus the comparable period last year.
TABLE 4
Noninterest Income
($ in Thousands)
                                                                 
    3rd Qtr.   3rd Qtr.   Dollar   Percent   YTD   YTD   Dollar   Percent
    2009   2008   Change   Change   2009   2008   Change   Change
 
Trust service fees
  $ 9,057     $ 10,020     $ (963 )     (9.6 )%   $ 26,103     $ 30,172     $ (4,069 )     (13.5 )%
Service charges on deposit accounts
    30,829       33,609       (2,780 )     (8.3 )     87,705       87,422       283       0.3  
Card-based and other nondeposit fees
    11,586       12,517       (931 )     (7.4 )     33,618       36,243       (2,625 )     (7.2 )
Retail commission income
    15,041       14,928       113       0.8       45,382       47,047       (1,665 )     (3.5 )
     
Core fee-based revenue
    66,513       71,074       (4,561 )     (6.4 )     192,808       200,884       (8,076 )     (4.0 )
Mortgage banking income
    9,148       6,865       2,283       33.3       53,164       27,371       25,793       94.2  
Mortgage servicing rights expense
    10,057       3,294       6,763       205.3       21,509       11,460       10,049       87.7  
     
Mortgage banking, net
    (909 )     3,571       (4,480 )     (125.5 )     31,655       15,911       15,744       99.0  
Treasury management fees, net
    226       1,935       (1,709 )     (88.3 )     5,245       7,423       (2,178 )     (29.3 )
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) income
    3,789       5,235       (1,446 )     (27.6 )     12,722       15,093       (2,371 )     (15.7 )
Other
    5,858       6,520       (662 )     (10.2 )     17,148       23,122       (5,974 )     (25.8 )
     
Subtotal (“fee income”)
    75,477       88,335       (12,858 )     (14.6 )     259,578       262,433       (2,855 )     (1.1 )
Asset sale gains / (losses), net
    (126 )     573       (699 )     (122.0 )     (2,520 )     (614 )     (1,906 )     310.4  
Investment securities gains / (losses), net
    (42 )     (13,585 )     13,543       (99.7 )     9,169       (17,243 )     26,412       (153.2 )
     
Total noninterest income
  $ 75,309     $ 75,323     $ (14 )     (0.0 )%   $ 266,227     $ 244,576     $ 21,651       8.9 %
     
Trust service fees were $26.1 million, down $4.1 million (13.5%) between the comparable nine-month periods, primarily due to weaker stock market performance. The market value of assets under management was $5.2 billion and $5.6 billion at September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Service charges on deposit accounts were $87.7 million, up $0.3 million (0.3%) over the comparable period last year. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in business service charges (up $3.0 million, aided by a lower earnings credit rate between the comparable nine-month periods), partially offset by lower nonsufficient funds / overdraft fees (down $2.4 million).
Card-based and other nondeposit fees were $33.6 million, down $2.6 million (7.2%) from the first nine months of 2008, primarily due to a decline in the volume of customer transactions. Retail commission income (which includes commission income from insurance and brokerage product sales) was $45.4 million for the first nine months of 2009, down $1.7 million (3.5%) compared to the first nine months of 2008, including lower brokerage and variable annuity commissions (down $1.1 million to $7.0 million on a combined basis) and decreases in insurance commissions (down $0.5 million to $33.1 million), while fixed annuity commissions were relatively flat.
Net mortgage banking income was $31.7 million for the first nine months of 2009, up $15.7 million compared to the first nine months of 2008. Net mortgage banking income consists of gross mortgage banking income less mortgage servicing rights expense. Gross mortgage banking income (which includes

48


Table of Contents

servicing fees and the gain or loss on sales of mortgage loans to the secondary market, related fees and fair value marks (collectively “gains on sales and related income”)) was $53.2 million for the first nine months of 2009, an increase of $25.8 million compared to the first nine months of 2008. This $25.8 million increase between the comparable year-to-date periods is primarily attributable to higher gains on sales and related income (up $24.0 million). Secondary mortgage production was $3.1 billion for the first nine months of 2009, an increase of 162% versus secondary mortgage production of $1.2 billion for the first nine months of 2008.
Mortgage servicing rights expense includes both the amortization of the mortgage servicing rights asset and changes to the valuation allowance associated with the mortgage servicing rights asset. Mortgage servicing rights expense is affected by the size of the servicing portfolio, as well as the changes in the estimated fair value of the mortgage servicing rights asset. Mortgage servicing rights expense was $10.1 million higher than the first nine months of 2008, with a $7.9 million increase to the valuation reserve (comprised of a $7.5 million addition to the valuation reserve for the first nine months of 2009 compared to a $0.4 million recovery to the valuation reserve for the first nine months of 2008) and $2.2 million higher base amortization. As mortgage interest rates decline, prepayment speeds are usually faster and the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset generally decreases, potentially requiring additional valuation reserve. Conversely, as mortgage interest rates rise, prepayment speeds are usually slower and the value of the mortgage servicing rights asset generally increases, potentially requiring less valuation reserve. Management recognizes that the volatility in the valuation of the mortgage servicing rights asset will continue. At September 30, 2009, the mortgage servicing rights asset, net of its valuation allowance, was $61.1 million, representing 82 bp of the $7.5 billion servicing portfolio, compared to a net mortgage servicing rights asset of $54.0 million, representing 82 bp of the $6.6 billion servicing portfolio at September 30, 2008. The valuation of the mortgage servicing rights asset is considered a critical accounting policy. See section “Critical Accounting Policies,” as well as Note 7, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” and Note 13, “Fair Value Measurements,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional disclosure.
Treasury management fees (which include fee income from foreign currency and interest rate risk related services provided to our customers) were $5.2 million, a decrease of $2.2 million compared to the first nine months of 2008, due to a $2.5 million decrease in interest rate risk related fees, partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in foreign currency related fees. BOLI income was $12.7 million, down $2.4 million (15.7%) from the first nine months of 2008, due to the market impacts on the underlying assets of the BOLI investment. Other income of $17.1 million was $6.0 million lower than first nine months of 2008, with 2008 including a $0.8 million gain on an ownership interest divestiture and $4.7 million in gains related to Visa, Inc. (“Visa”) matters, while 2009 includes $0.3 million in gains related to Visa matters.
The Visa matters in the first nine months of 2008 resulted in the Corporation recording a total gain of $4.7 million, which included a $3.2 million gain from the mandatory partial redemption of the Corporation’s Class B common stock in Visa Inc. related to Visa’s initial public offering which was completed during first quarter 2008 and a $1.5 million gain and a corresponding receivable (included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets) for the Corporation’s pro rata interest in the litigation escrow account established by Visa from which settlements of certain covered litigation will be paid (Visa may add to this over time through a defined process which may involve a further redemption of the Class B common stock). In addition, the Corporation has a zero basis (i.e., historical cost/carryover basis) in the shares of unredeemed Visa Class B common stock which are convertible with limitations into Visa Class A common stock based on a conversion rate that is subject to change in accordance with specified terms (including provision of Visa’s retrospective responsibility plan which provides that Class B stockholders will bear the financial impact of certain covered litigation) and no sooner than the longer of three years or resolution of covered litigation. During 2009, the Corporation recorded a gain of $0.3 million and a corresponding

49


Table of Contents

receivable for the Corporation’s additional pro rata interest in the Visa litigation escrow account. For additional discussion of the Visa matters see Note 12, “Commitments, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, and Contingent Liabilities,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Net asset sale losses were $2.5 million for the first nine months of 2009, compared to net asset sale losses of $0.6 million for the comparable period last year, with the $1.9 million increase primarily due to higher losses on sales of other real estate owned. Net investment securities gains of $9.2 million for the first nine months of 2009 were attributable to gains of $14.6 million on the sale of mortgage-related securities, partially offset by a $2.9 million loss on the sale of a mortgage-related security and credit-related other-than-temporary write-downs of $2.5 million on the Corporation’s holding of a trust preferred debt security, a non-agency mortgage-related security, and various equity securities, while net investment securities losses of $17.2 million for the first nine months of 2008 were attributable to other-than-temporary write-downs on the Corporation’s holding of various debt and equity securities (including a $12.3 million write-down on two preferred stocks, a $3.5 million write-down on two trust preferred debt securities, and $1.4 million write-down on three common equity securities). See Note 6, “Investment Securities,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional disclosure.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense was $452.4 million for the first nine months of 2009, up $43.7 million (10.7%) over the first nine months of 2008. Personnel expense was down $0.3 million (0.1%) between the comparable nine-month periods, FDIC expense increased $30.7 million, and foreclosure / OREO expense was up $20.3 million, while all remaining expense categories on a combined basis were down $7.0 million (4.2%).
TABLE 5
Noninterest Expense
($ in Thousands)
                                                                 
    3rd Qtr.   3rd Qtr.   Dollar   Percent   YTD   YTD   Dollar   Percent
    2009   2008   Change   Change   2009   2008   Change   Change
 
Personnel expense
  $ 73,501     $ 78,395     $ (4,894 )     (6.2 )%   $ 231,770     $ 232,104     $ (334 )     (0.1 )%
Occupancy
    11,949       12,037       (88 )     (0.7 )     37,171       37,327       (156 )     (0.4 )
Equipment
    4,575       5,088       (513 )     (10.1 )     13,834       14,338       (504 )     (3.5 )
Data processing
    7,442       7,634       (192 )     (2.5 )     23,165       23,005       160       0.7  
Business development and advertising
    3,910       5,175       (1,265 )     (24.4 )     13,590       15,353       (1,763 )     (11.5 )
Other intangible asset amortization expense
    1,386       1,568       (182 )     (11.6 )     4,157       4,705       (548 )     (11.6 )
Stationery and supplies
    1,280       1,755       (475 )     (27.1 )     4,632       5,763       (1,131 )     (19.6 )
FDIC expense
    8,451       791       7,660       N/M       32,316       1,594       30,722       N/M  
Courier
    1,096       1,594       (498 )     (31.2 )     3,601       4,645       (1,044 )     (22.5 )
Postage
    1,668       1,848       (180 )     (9.7 )     5,553       5,735       (182 )     (3.2 )
Legal and professional
    3,349       3,538       (189 )     (5.3 )     13,176       9,255       3,921       42.4  
Foreclosure / OREO expense
    8,688       2,427       6,261       258.0       27,277       6,969       20,308       291.4  
Other
    13,816       14,727       (911 )     (6.2 )     42,164       47,917       (5,753 )     (12.0 )
     
Total noninterest expense
  $ 141,111     $ 136,577     $ 4,534       3.3 %   $ 452,406     $ 408,710     $ 43,696       10.7 %
     
 
N/M — Not meaningful.
Personnel expense (which includes salary and commission-related expenses and fringe benefit expenses) was $231.8 million for the first nine months of 2009, down $0.3 million (0.1%) versus the comparable period of 2008. Average full-time equivalent employees were 5,088 for the first nine months of 2009, down 1.0% from 5,137 for the first nine months of 2008. Salary-related expenses increased $0.3 million (0.2%). This increase was primarily the result of higher compensation and commissions (up $6.4 million or 3.8%, including merit increases between the years, higher commissions due to current secondary mortgage production volume, and higher compensation related to the vesting of stock options and restricted stock grants) and $1.7 million attributable to an executive separation agreement, while formal / discretionary bonuses declined (down $7.5 million). Fringe benefit expenses were down $0.6 million (1.4%) versus the first nine months of 2008, primarily from lower costs of premium-based benefits (down $1.4 million, aided

50


Table of Contents

by health care cost management), partially offset by higher benefit plan and other fringe benefit expenses (up $0.8 million).
Compared to the first nine months of 2008, occupancy expense of $37.2 million was down $0.2 million (0.4%), equipment expense of $13.8 million was down $0.5 million (3.5%), data processing of $23.2 million was up $0.2 million (0.7%), business development and advertising of $13.6 million was down $1.8 million (11.5%), stationery and supplies of $4.6 million was down $1.1 million (19.6%), and courier expense of $3.6 million was down $1.0 million (22.5%), reflecting efforts to control selected discretionary expenses. Other intangible asset amortization decreased $0.5 million (11.6%), attributable to the full amortization of certain intangible assets during 2008. FDIC expense increased $30.7 million as the one-time assessment credit was exhausted, the assessment rate more than doubled in January 2009, and the second quarter of 2009 included a special assessment of $11.3 million. Legal and professional fees of $13.2 million increased $3.9 million primarily due to higher legal and other professional consultant costs related to increased foreclosure activities and other corporate projects. Foreclosure / OREO expenses of $27.3 million increased $20.3 million, including an $11.4 million increase in OREO write-downs (primarily attributable to a $7 million write-down on a foreclosed property) and a general rise in foreclosure expenses (impacted by the continued deterioration of the real estate market). Other expense decreased $5.8 million (12.0%) from the comparable period last year, with the first nine months of 2008 including a $2.3 million increase to the reserve for losses on unfunded commitments, as well as declines in miscellaneous other expense categories given the efforts to control selected discretionary expenses. For the remainder of 2009, the Corporation expects the level of total noninterest expense to remain at levels approximating those experienced during the third quarter of 2009 due to the sustained effort to manage expenses.
Income Taxes
For the first nine months of 2009, the Corporation recognized income tax benefit of $35.8 million compared to income tax expense of $51.6 million for the first nine months of 2008. The reduction in income tax expense was primarily due to the level of pretax income between the comparable nine-month periods. In addition, during the first quarter of 2009 the Corporation recorded a $17.0 million net decrease in the valuation allowance on and changes to state deferred tax assets as a result of the recently enacted Wisconsin combined reporting tax legislation, while during the second quarter of 2009 the Corporation recorded a $5.0 million decrease in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. Also, the first quarter 2008 resolution of certain tax matters and changes in the estimated exposure of uncertain tax positions, partially offset by the increase in valuation allowance related to certain deferred tax assets, resulted in the net reduction of previously recorded tax liabilities and income tax expense of approximately $4.4 million.
Income tax expense recorded in the consolidated statements of income involves the interpretation and application of certain accounting pronouncements and federal and state tax codes, and is, therefore, considered a critical accounting policy. The Corporation undergoes examination by various taxing authorities. Such taxing authorities may require that changes in the amount of tax expense or valuation allowance be recognized when their interpretations differ from those of management, based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examinations. See Note 10, “Income Taxes,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements and section “Critical Accounting Policies.”
Balance Sheet
At September 30, 2009, total assets were $22.9 billion, a decrease of $1.3 billion (5%) since December 31, 2008. The decrease in assets was primarily due to a $1.5 billion decline in loans and a $147 million increase in the allowance for loan losses, partially offset by a $508 million increase in investment securities available for sale. The growth in investment securities was primarily funded by deposits, as both short-term borrowings and long-term funding declined since year end 2008.
Loans of $14.8 billion at September 30, 2009, were down $1.5 billion (9%) from December 31, 2008, with declines in both commercial and retail loan balances, and a slight shift in the mix of loans between the

51


Table of Contents

September and December periods. The decline in loans since year-end 2008 was predominantly due to commercial loans (down $1.1 billion, led by commercial, financial and agriculture loans and real estate construction) and home equity (down $292 million). Investment securities available for sale were $5.7 billion, up $508 million over year-end 2008 (primarily in mortgage-related investment securities). For the remainder of 2009, the Corporation anticipates that loan balances will continue to decline due to reduced demand related to the continued economic uncertainty, as well as changes to the current credit policies.
At September 30, 2009, total deposits of $16.4 billion were up $1.3 billion (9%) from December 31, 2008, primarily attributable to increases in money market and interest-bearing demand deposits. Since year-end 2008, money market deposits increased $798 million (including a $235 million increase in network transaction deposits) and interest-bearing demand deposits grew $599 million, while other time deposits decreased $170 million and brokered CDs declined $136 million. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits grew $170 million to $3.0 billion and represented 18% of total deposits, compared to 19% of total deposits at December 31, 2008. Wholesale funding of $3.3 billion was down $2.3 billion since year-end 2008, with short-term borrowings down $2.2 billion and long-term funding down $0.1 billion.
Since September 30, 2008, loans decreased $1.5 billion (9%), with commercial loans down $1.1 billion (11%) and home equity down $302 million (10%). Since September 30, 2008, deposits grew $2.2 billion, primarily attributable to a $1.1 billion increase in money market deposits (which includes a $411 million increase in network transaction deposits), a $728 million increase in interest-bearing demand deposits, and a $439 million increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits.
TABLE 6
Period End Loan Composition
($ in Thousands)
                                                                                 
    September 30, 2009   June 30, 2009   March 31, 2009   December 31, 2008   September 30, 2008
     
            % of           % of           % of           % of           % of
    Amount   Total   Amount   Total   Amount   Total   Amount   Total   Amount   Total
 
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
  $ 3,613,457       25 %   $ 3,904,925       25 %   $ 4,160,274       26 %   $ 4,388,691       27 %   $ 4,343,208       27 %
Commercial real estate
    3,902,340       26       3,737,749       24       3,575,301       22       3,566,551       22       3,534,791       22  
Real estate construction
    1,611,857       11       1,963,919       13       2,228,090       14       2,260,888       13       2,363,116       14  
Lease financing
    102,130       1       110,262       1       116,100       1       122,113       1       125,907       1  
     
Commercial
    9,229,784       63       9,716,855       63       10,079,765       63       10,338,243       63       10,367,022       64  
Home equity (1)
    2,591,262       17       2,656,747       17       2,784,248       18       2,883,317       18       2,892,952       18  
Installment
    885,970       6       844,065       6       853,214       5       827,303       5       842,741       5  
     
Retail
    3,477,232       23       3,500,812       23       3,637,462       23       3,710,620       23       3,735,693       23  
Residential mortgage
    2,058,581       14       2,092,440       14       2,200,725       14       2,235,045       14       2,169,772       13  
     
Total loans
  $ 14,765,597       100 %   $ 15,310,107       100 %   $ 15,917,952       100 %   $ 16,283,908       100 %   $ 16,272,487       100 %
     
 
           
(1) Home equity includes home equity lines and residential mortgage junior liens.
 
                                                                               
Farmland
  $ 48,584       1 %   $ 52,010       1 %   $ 56,258       2 %   $ 57,242       1 %   $ 58,015       2 %
Multi-family
    538,724       14       500,363       13       507,722       14       496,059       14       503,450       14  
Owner occupied
    1,264,295       32       1,335,935       36       1,258,677       35       1,239,139       35       1,218,441       34  
Non-owner occupied
    2,050,737       53       1,849,441       50       1,752,644       49       1,774,111       50       1,754,885       50  
     
Commercial real estate
  $ 3,902,340       100 %   $ 3,737,749       100 %   $ 3,575,301       100 %   $ 3,566,551       100 %   $ 3,534,791       100 %
     
 
                                                                               
1-4 family construction
  $ 293,568       18 %   $ 329,699       17 %   $ 398,711       18 %   $ 423,137       19 %   $ 438,323       19 %
All other construction
    1,318,289       82       1,634,220       83       1,829,379       82       1,837,751       81       1,924,793       81  
     
Real estate construction
  $ 1,611,857       100 %   $ 1,963,919       100 %   $ 2,228,090       100 %   $ 2,260,888       100 %   $ 2,363,116       100 %
     

52


Table of Contents

TABLE 7
Period End Deposit Composition
($ in Thousands)
                                                                                 
    September 30, 2009   June 30, 2009   March 31, 2009   December 31, 2008   September 30, 2008
     
            % of           % of           % of           % of           % of
    Amount   Total   Amount   Total   Amount   Total   Amount   Total   Amount   Total
 
Noninterest-bearing demand
  $ 2,984,486       18 %   $ 2,846,570       17 %   $ 2,818,088       18 %   $ 2,814,079       19 %   $ 2,545,779       18 %
Savings
    871,539       5       898,527       6       895,310       6       841,129       6       888,731       6  
Interest-bearing demand
    2,395,429       15       2,242,800       14       1,796,724       11       1,796,405       12       1,667,640       12  
Money market
    5,724,418       35       5,410,498       33       5,410,095       34       4,926,088       32       4,608,686       32  
Brokered CDs
    653,090       4       930,582       6       922,491       6       789,536       5       579,607       4  
Other time
    3,817,147       23       3,991,414       24       4,030,481       25       3,987,559       26       3,955,224       28  
     
Total deposits
  $ 16,446,109       100 %   $ 16,320,391       100 %   $ 15,873,189       100 %   $ 15,154,796       100 %   $ 14,245,667       100 %
     
Total deposits, excluding Brokered CDs
  $ 15,793,019       96 %   $ 15,389,809       94 %   $ 14,950,698       94 %   $ 14,365,260       95 %   $ 13,666,060       96 %
Network transaction deposits included above in interest-bearing demand and money market
  $ 1,767,271       11 %   $ 1,605,722       10 %   $ 1,759,656       11 %   $ 1,530,675       10 %   $ 1,356,616       10 %
Total deposits, excluding Brokered CDs and network transaction deposits
  $ 14,025,748       85 %   $ 13,784,087       84 %   $ 13,191,042       83 %   $ 12,834,585       85 %   $ 12,309,444       86 %
Allowance for Loan Losses
Credit risks within the loan portfolio are inherently different for each loan type. Credit risk is controlled and monitored through the use of lending standards, a thorough review of potential borrowers, and on-going review of loan payment performance. Active asset quality administration, including early problem loan identification and timely resolution of problems, aids in the management of credit risk and minimization of loan losses. The Corporation engages in continuous improvement efforts to strengthen all aspects of its asset quality administration.
The level of the allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of an amount appropriate to provide for probable credit losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. In general, the change in the allowance for loan losses is a function of a number of factors, including but not limited to changes in the loan portfolio (see Table 6), net charge offs (see Table 8) and nonperforming loans (see Table 9). To assess the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses, an allocation methodology is applied by the Corporation. The allocation methodology focuses on evaluation of several factors, including but not limited to: evaluation of facts and issues related to specific loans, management’s on-going review and grading of the loan portfolio, consideration of historical loan loss and delinquency experience on each portfolio category, trends in past due and nonperforming loans, the level of potential problem loans, the risk characteristics of the various classifications of loans, changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing economic conditions, the fair value of underlying collateral, and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses. Assessing these numerous factors involves significant judgment. Therefore, management considers the allowance for loan losses a critical accounting policy (see section “Critical Accounting Policies”).
The allocation methodology used at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was comparable, whereby the Corporation segregated its loss factors allocations, used for both criticized (defined as specific loans warranting either specific allocation or a criticized status of special mention, substandard, or doubtful) and non-criticized loan categories (which include watch rated loans), into a component primarily based on historical loss rates and a component primarily based on other qualitative factors that may affect loan collectibility. Factors applied are reviewed periodically and adjusted to reflect changes in trends or other risks. In the first quarter of 2009, the definition of criticized loans was changed to exclude watch rated loans to be consistent with the regulatory definition of criticized loans.

53


Table of Contents

At September 30, 2009, the allowance for loan losses was $412.5 million compared to $246.2 million at September 30, 2008, and $265.4 million at December 31, 2008. The allowance for loan losses to total loans at September 30, 2009, was 2.79% and covered 47% of nonperforming loans, compared to 1.51% and 81%, respectively, at September 30, 2008, and 1.63% and 78%, respectively, at December 31, 2008. At September 30, 2009, the Corporation had $684.1 million of specifically identified nonaccrual commercial loans with a current allowance for loan losses allocation of $72.9 million and for which the Corporation had recognized $116.9 million of net charge offs. Management’s allowance methodology includes an impairment analysis on specifically identified commercial loans defined as impaired by the Corporation, as well as other qualitative and quantitative factors (including, but not limited to, historical trends, risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio, and existing economic conditions) in determining the overall adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Tables 8 and 9 provide additional information regarding activity in the allowance for loan losses and nonperforming assets.
The provision for loan losses for the first nine months of 2009 was $355.9 million, compared to $137.0 million for the first nine months of 2008, and $202.1 million for the full year 2008. Gross charge offs were $215.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, $98.1 million for the comparable period ended September 30, 2008, and $145.8 million for the full 2008 year, while recoveries for the corresponding periods were $7.1 million, $6.7 million and $8.6 million, respectively. The increase in net charge offs was primarily due to larger specific commercial charge offs (including charge offs of $58 million attributable to 5 specific commercial, financial, and agricultural credits (of which, $25.0 million was due to a specific financial institution), as well as higher charge offs on commercial credits directly related to the housing industry or impacted by the prolonged weak real estate and economic environments), and due to a general rise in home equity and residential mortgage net charge offs (primarily attributable to deteriorating economic conditions and a weak housing market). The ratio of net charge offs to average loans on an annualized basis was 1.75%, 0.76%, and 0.85% for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and for the 2008 year, respectively.
The current market conditions continue to present unique asset quality issues for the banking industry (including the ongoing effects of weak economic conditions; soft commercial and residential real estate markets; and waning consumer confidence) and for the Corporation (including elevated net charge offs and higher nonperforming loan levels compared to the Corporation’s longer-term historical experience). In a stressed real estate market, such as currently exists, the value of the collateral securing the loans has become one of the most important factors in determining the amount of loss incurred and the appropriate amount of allowance for loan losses to record at the measurement date. While the likelihood of losses that are equal to the entire recorded investment for a real estate loan is remote, declining collateral values have significantly contributed to the elevated levels of net charge offs and the increase in the provision for loan losses that the Corporation has experienced in recent quarters. Based on these current market conditions and our continuous monitoring of specific individual nonperforming and potential problem loans, we anticipate that net charge offs and the provision for loan losses will remain elevated as the impact of the weak economy and stress on our customers continues. We cannot predict the duration of asset quality stress for future periods, given uncertainty as to the magnitude and scope of economic weakness in our markets, on our customers, and on underlying real estate values (residential and commercial).
While there was minimal change in overall loan mix (see section “Balance Sheet” and Table 6), loans declined $1.5 billion since year-end 2008 in both commercial and retail loan categories (particularly commercial, financial and agricultural loans, real estate construction, and home equity); and compared to September 30, 2008, loans declined $1.5 billion. During the third quarter of 2009, the growth in criticized commercial loans, potential problem loans, nonperforming loans, and loans past due 30-89 days began to moderate compared to the growth experienced in these categories during the first two quarters of 2009. Criticized commercial loans increased 6% since June 30, 2009, and increased 66% since year-end 2008, with continued stress on borrowers from difficult economic conditions and negative commercial and residential real estate market issues pervading into many related businesses; and compared to a year ago, criticized commercial loans increased 84%. At September 30, 2009, criticized commercial loans represented 21% of total loans (with commercial, financial, and agricultural loans, real estate construction

54


Table of Contents

loans, and commercial real estate loans representing 7%, 6%, and 8%, respectively, of total loans), compared to 12% of total loans at December 31, 2008 (with commercial, financial, and agricultural loans, real estate construction loans, commercial real estate loans, and residential real estate loans representing 4%, 4%, 3%, and 1%, respectively, of total loans) and 10% of total loans at September 30, 2008 (with commercial, financial, and agricultural loans, real estate construction loans, commercial real estate loans, and residential real estate loans representing 3%, 4%, 2%, and 1%, respectively, of total loans). Loans past due 30-89 days decreased $15 million since year end 2008, with commercial past due loans down $16 million and consumer-related past due loans up $1 million, and decreased $34 million since June 30, 2009, including a $35 million decrease in commercial past due loans and a $1 million increase in consumer-related past due loans. Since year-end 2008, nonperforming loans rose $545 million to $886 million at September 30, 2009, with commercial nonperforming loans up $487 million (primarily attributable to larger construction and other commercial credits directly related to the housing industry or impacted by the prolonged weak real estate market and economic environment) to $744 million, and total consumer-related nonperforming loans up $58 million to $142 million (Table 9). On a sequential quarter basis, nonperforming loans increased $152 million, including a $124 million increase in commercial nonperforming loans and a $28 million increase in consumer-related nonperforming loans. Nonperforming loans to total loans were 6.00%, 2.09% and 1.87% at September 30, 2009, and December 31 and September 30, 2008, respectively. The allowance for loan losses to loans increased to 2.79% at September 30, 2009, from 1.63% at year-end 2008, as the provision for loan losses for the first nine months of 2009 exceeded net charge offs by $147.2 million, while the allowance for loan losses to loans was 1.51% at September 30, 2008.
Management believes the level of the allowance for loan losses to be appropriate at September 30, 2009.
Consolidated net income could be affected if management’s estimate of the allowance for loan losses is subsequently materially different, requiring additional or less provision for loan losses to be recorded. Management carefully considers numerous detailed and general factors, its assumptions, and the likelihood of materially different conditions that could alter its assumptions. While management uses currently available information to recognize losses on loans, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary based on newly received appraisals, updated commercial customer financial statements, rapidly deteriorating customer cash flow, and changes in economic conditions that affect our customers. Additionally, larger credit relationships (defined by management as over $25 million) do not inherently create more risk, but can create wider fluctuations in net charge offs and asset quality measures compared to the Corporation’s longer historical trends. As an integral part of their examination process, various federal and state regulatory agencies also review the allowance for loan losses. These agencies may require that certain loan balances be classified differently or charged off when their credit evaluations differ from those of management, based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

55


Table of Contents

TABLE 8
Allowance for Loan Losses
($ in Thousands)
                                                 
    At and for the nine months           At and for the year    
    ended September 30,           ended December 31,    
 
    2009           2008       2008    
     
Allowance for Loan Losses:
                                               
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 265,378             $ 200,570             $ 200,570          
Provision for loan losses
    355,856               137,014               202,058          
Charge offs
    (215,839 )             (98,076 )             (145,826 )        
Recoveries
    7,135               6,681               8,576          
     
Net charge offs
    (208,704 )             (91,395 )             (137,250 )        
     
Balance at end of period
  $ 412,530             $ 246,189             $ 265,378          
     
                                                 
Net loan charge offs (recoveries):
            (A )             (A )             (A )
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
  $ 112,737       375     $ 23,750       73     $ 39,207       90  
Commercial real estate (CRE)
    15,689       57       9,106       34       12,541       35  
Real estate construction
    32,538       212       38,011       217       55,709       238  
Lease financing
    1,309       155       368       41       570       47  
     
Total commercial
    162,273       219       71,235       91       108,027       104  
Home equity
    32,287       158       13,669       71       19,627       74  
Installment
    6,740       105       4,151       66       6,160       74  
     
Total retail
    39,027       146       17,820       70       25,787       74  
Residential mortgage
    7,404       40       2,340       14       3,436       16  
     
Total net charge offs
  $ 208,704       175     $ 91,395       76     $ 137,250       85  
     
 
                                               
CRE & Construction Net Charge Off Detail:
                            (A )     (A )     (A )
Farmland
  $ 171       42     $ (1 )         $ 74       13  
Multi-family
    1,525       40       374       10       1,116       22  
Owner occupied
    5,339       55       3,834       41       4,627       37  
Non-owner occupied
    8,654       63       4,899       37       6,724       38  
     
Commercial real estate
  $ 15,689       57     $ 9,106       34     $ 12,541       35  
     
1-4 family construction
  $ 14,736       543     $ 15,205       466     $ 21,724       496  
All other construction
    17,802       141       22,806       160       33,985       178  
     
Real estate construction
  $ 32,538       212     $ 38,011       217     $ 55,709       238  
     
 
(A)   — Annualized ratio of net charge offs to average loans by loan type in basis points.
                         
Ratios:
                       
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
    2.79 %     1.51 %     1.63 %
Allowance for loan losses to net charge offs (annualized)
    1.5 %     2.0 %     1.9 %

56


Table of Contents

TABLE 8 (continued)
Allowance for Loan Losses
($ in Thousands)
                                                                                 
    September 30,           June 30,           March 31,           December 31,           September 30,        
Quarterly Trends:   2009           2009           2009           2008           2008        
     
Allowance for Loan Losses:
                                                                               
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 407,167             $ 313,228             $ 265,378             $ 246,189             $ 229,605          
Provision for loan losses
    95,410               155,022               105,424               65,044               55,011          
Charge offs
    (92,340 )             (63,325 )             (60,174 )             (47,750 )             (40,344 )        
Recoveries
    2,293               2,242               2,600               1,895               1,917          
     
Net charge offs
    (90,047 )             (61,083 )             (57,574 )             (45,855 )             (38,427 )        
     
Balance at end of period
  $ 412,530             $ 407,167             $ 313,228             $ 265,378             $ 246,189          
     
                                                                                 
Net loan charge offs (recoveries):
            (A )             (A )             (A )             (A )             (A )
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
  $ 57,480       611     $ 19,367       191     $ 35,890       341     $ 15,457       143     $ 7,813       72  
Commercial real estate (CRE)
    4,449       45       8,382       92       2,858       32       3,435       39       3,650       41  
Real estate construction
    12,837       285       16,249       307       3,452       62       17,698       299       19,715       328  
Lease financing
    319       119       988       349       2       1       202       65       140       45  
     
Total commercial
    75,085       313       44,986       182       42,202       167       36,792       142       31,318       120  
Home equity
    11,202       170       10,343       152       10,742       153       5,958       82       4,543       64  
Installment
    2,433       113       2,321       110       1,986       94       2,009       96       1,426       69  
     
Total retail
    13,635       156       12,664       142       12,728       139       7,967       85       5,969       65  
Residential mortgage
    1,327       23       3,433       53       2,644       43       1,096       20       1,140       21  
     
Total net charge offs
  $ 90,047       234     $ 61,083       152     $ 57,574       142     $ 45,855       112     $ 38,427       94  
     
 
                                                                               
CRE & Construction Net Charge Off Detail:     (A )             (A )             (A )             (A )             (A )
Farmland
  $           $ 210       154     $ (39 )     (28 )   $ 75       52     $        
Multi-family
    444       33       412       33       669       54       742       59       (32 )     (2 )
Owner occupied
    2,102       62       2,371       74       866       28       793       26       93       3  
Non-owner occupied
    1,903       39       5,389       121       1,362       31       1,825       41       3,589       81  
     
Commercial real estate
  $ 4,449       45     $ 8,382       92     $ 2,858       32     $ 3,435       39     $ 3,650       41  
     
1-4 family construction
  $ 11,459       N/M     $ 2,401       274     $ 876       86     $ 6,519       584     $ 4,022       364  
All other construction
    1,378       37       13,848       313       2,576       57       11,179       232       15,693       320  
     
Real estate construction
  $ 12,837       285     $ 16,249       307     $ 3,452       62     $ 17,698       299     $ 19,715       328  
     
 
N/M — Not meaningful.

57


Table of Contents

TABLE 9
Nonperforming Assets
($ in Thousands)
                                         
    Sept 30,   June 30,   March 31,   Dec 31,   Sept 30,
    2009   2009   2009   2008   2008
 
Nonperforming assets:
                                       
Nonaccrual loans:
                                       
Commercial
  $ 737,817     $ 616,434     $ 355,579     $ 257,322     $ 235,288  
Residential mortgage
    75,681       57,277       51,248       45,146       36,094  
Retail
    31,822       26,803       26,419       24,389       18,657  
     
Total nonaccrual loans
    845,320       700,514       433,246       326,857       290,039  
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:
                                       
Commercial
    6,155       3,339       905             1,870  
Residential mortgage
                10       10       11  
Retail
    17,019       16,446       15,087       13,801       12,750  
     
Total accruing loans past due 90 days or more
    23,174       19,785       16,002       13,811       14,631  
Restructured loans
    17,256       13,089       2,927              
     
Total nonperforming loans
    885,750       733,388       452,175       340,668       304,670  
Other real estate owned (OREO)
    60,010       51,633       54,883       48,710       46,473  
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 945,760     $ 785,021     $ 507,058     $ 389,378     $ 351,143  
     
Ratios:
                                       
Nonperforming loans to total loans
    6.00 %     4.79 %     2.84 %     2.09 %     1.87 %
Nonperforming assets to total loans plus OREO
    6.38       5.11       3.17       2.38       2.15  
Nonperforming assets to total assets
    4.13       3.27       2.08       1.61       1.56  
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
    46.57       55.52       69.27       77.90       80.81  
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
    2.79       2.66       1.97       1.63       1.51  
     
Nonperforming assets by type:
                                       
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
  $ 209,843     $ 187,943     $ 102,257     $ 104,664     $ 85,995  
Commercial real estate (CRE)
    213,736       165,929       100,838       62,423       52,875  
Real estate construction
    301,844       264,402       152,008       90,048       98,205  
Leasing
    18,814       1,929       1,707       187       83  
     
Total commercial
    744,237       620,203       356,810       257,322       237,158  
Home equity
    45,905       38,474       35,224       31,035       25,372  
Installment
    7,387       7,545       6,755       7,155       6,035  
     
Total retail
    53,292       46,019       41,979       38,190       31,407  
Residential mortgage
    88,221       67,166       53,386       45,156       36,105  
     
Total nonperforming loans
    885,750       733,388       452,175       340,668       304,670  
Commercial real estate owned
    45,188       36,818       36,729       28,724       29,581  
Residential real estate owned
    11,635       11,628       13,484       15,178       12,084  
Bank properties real estate owned
    3,187       3,187       4,670       4,808       4,808  
     
Other real estate owned
    60,010       51,633       54,883       48,710       46,473  
     
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 945,760     $ 785,021     $ 507,058     $ 389,378     $ 351,143  
     
 
                                       
CRE & Construction Nonperforming Loan Detail:
                                       
Farmland
  $ 1,303     $ 400     $ 706     $ 36     $ 267  
Multi-family
    23,317       13,696       11,414       10,819       9,296  
Owner occupied
    46,623       45,304       35,867       22,999       16,478  
Non-owner occupied
    142,493       106,529       52,851       28,569       26,834  
     
Commercial real estate
  $ 213,736     $ 165,929     $ 100,838     $ 62,423     $ 52,875  
     
 
                                       
1-4 family construction
  $ 88,849     $ 91,216     $ 58,443     $ 38,727     $ 40,441  
All other construction
    212,995       173,186       93,565       51,321       57,764  
     
Real estate construction
  $ 301,844     $ 264,402     $ 152,008     $ 90,048     $ 98,205  
     

58


Table of Contents

TABLE 9 (continued)
Nonperforming Assets
($ in Thousands)
                                         
    Sept 30,   June 30,   March 31,   Dec 31,   Sept 30,
    2009   2009   2009   2008   2008
 
Loans 30-89 days past due by type:
                                       
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
  $ 43,159     $ 47,515     $ 60,838     $ 40,109     $ 61,344  
Commercial real estate (CRE)
    50,029       66,288       61,587       83,066       40,965  
Real estate construction
    39,184       35,166       75,136       25,266       44,587  
Leasing
    873       18,833       759       370       5,147  
     
Total commercial
    133,245       167,802       198,320       148,811       152,043  
Home equity
    16,852       19,755       18,137       16,606       14,775  
Installment
    7,401       7,577       10,382       9,733       9,371  
     
Total retail
    24,253       27,332       28,519       26,339       24,146  
Residential mortgage
    17,994       14,189       19,015       14,962       15,325  
     
Total loans past due 30-89 days
  $ 175,492     $ 209,323     $ 245,854     $ 190,112     $ 191,514  
     
 
                                       
CRE & Construction Past Due Loan Detail:
                                       
Farmland
  $ 265     $ 1,493     $ 1,257     $ 892     $ 646  
Multi-family
    2,780       4,120       5,168       3,394       2,808  
Owner occupied
    21,071       28,339       16,072       13,179       15,468  
Non-owner occupied
    25,913       32,336       39,090       65,601       22,043  
     
Commercial real estate
  $ 50,029     $ 66,288     $ 61,587     $ 83,066     $ 40,965  
     
 
                                       
1-4 family construction
  $ 9,530     $ 14,668     $ 29,753     $ 6,150     $ 7,937  
All other construction
    29,654       20,498       45,383       19,116       36,650  
     
Real estate construction
  $ 39,184     $ 35,166     $ 75,136     $ 25,266     $ 44,587  
     
 
                                       
Potential problem loans
  $ 1,573,903     $ 1,426,171     $ 1,016,551     $ 937,802     $ 765,641  
Nonperforming Loans and Other Real Estate Owned
Management is committed to an aggressive nonaccrual and problem loan identification philosophy. This philosophy is implemented through the ongoing monitoring and review of all pools of risk in the loan portfolio to ensure that problem loans are identified timely and the risk of loss is minimized. Table 9 provides detailed information regarding nonperforming assets, which include nonperforming loans and other real estate owned.
Nonperforming loans are considered one indicator of potential future loan losses. Nonperforming loans are defined as nonaccrual loans, loans 90 days or more past due but still accruing, and restructured loans. The Corporation specifically excludes from its definition of nonperforming loans student loan balances that are 90 days or more past due and still accruing and that have contractual government guarantees as to collection of principal and interest. The Corporation had approximately $18.8 million, $13.0 million and $14.7 million of these past due student loans at September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Nonperforming loans were $886 million at September 30, 2009, compared to $305 million at September 30, 2008 and $341 million at year-end 2008, reflecting in part the impact of the weak real estate markets and economic environment on the Corporation’s customers. Loans past due 30-89 days were $175 million at September 30, 2009, a decrease of $16 million from September 30, 2008 and a decrease of $15 million from December 31, 2008. The ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans was 6.00% at September 30, 2009, compared to 1.87% at September 30, 2008 and 2.09% at year-end 2008. The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans was 47% at September 30, 2009, down from 81% at September 30, 2008, and 78% at December 31, 2008.

59


Table of Contents

The recent market conditions have been marked with general economic and industry declines with pervasive impact on consumer confidence, business and personal financial performance, and commercial and residential real estate markets. The increase in nonperforming loans was primarily due to the impact of declining property values, slower sales, longer holding periods, and rising costs brought on by deteriorating real estate conditions and the weak economy, and was especially impacted by several larger individual commercial credit relationships. As shown in Table 9, total nonperforming loans were up $545 million since year-end 2008, with commercial nonperforming loans up $487 million (primarily attributable to larger construction and other commercial credits directly related to the housing industry or impacted by the prolonged weak real estate market and economic environment) and consumer-related nonperforming loans were up $58 million. Since September 30, 2008, total nonperforming loans increased $581 million, with commercial nonperforming loans up $507 million, while consumer-related nonperforming loans increased $74 million. The addition of these larger individual commercial credit relationships during 2008 and 2009 was the primary cause for the decline in the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans. The Corporation’s estimate of the appropriate allowance for loan losses does not have a targeted reserve to nonperforming loan coverage ratio. However, management’s allowance methodology at September 30, 2009, including an impairment analysis on specifically identified commercial loans defined by the Corporation as impaired, incorporated the level of specific reserves for these larger individual commercial credit relationships, as well as other factors, in determining the overall adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
Potential Problem Loans: The level of potential problem loans is another predominant factor in determining the relative level of risk in the loan portfolio and in determining the level of the allowance for loan losses. Potential problem loans are generally defined by management to include loans rated as substandard by management but that are not in nonperforming status; however, there are circumstances present to create doubt as to the ability of the borrower to comply with present repayment terms. The decision of management to include performing loans in potential problem loans does not necessarily mean that the Corporation expects losses to occur, but that management recognized a higher degree of risk associated with these loans. The loans that have been reported as potential problem loans are predominantly commercial loans covering a diverse range of businesses and real estate property types. At September 30, 2009, potential problem loans totaled $1.6 billion, compared to $0.9 billion at December 31, 2008. The $0.7 billion increase in potential problem loans since December 31, 2008, was primarily due to a $344 million increase in commercial real estate, a $150 million increase in real estate construction, and a $118 million increase in commercial, financial, and agricultural. The current rise in and level of potential problem loans highlights management’s continued heightened level of uncertainty of the pace at which a commercial credit may deteriorate, the duration of asset quality stress, and uncertainty around the magnitude and scope of economic stress that may be felt by the Corporation’s customers and on the underlying real estate values (both residential and commercial).
Other Real Estate Owned: Other real estate owned was $60.0 million at September 30, 2009, compared to $46.5 million at September 30, 2008, and $48.7 million at year-end 2008. The $13.5 million increase in other real estate owned between the September 30 periods was predominantly due to a $15.6 million increase in commercial real estate owned (with $21.7 million attributable to 10 larger commercial foreclosures, net of write-downs of $11 million on one large commercial property), partially offset by a $1.6 million decrease to bank premises no longer used for banking and reclassified into other real estate owned, and a $0.5 million decrease in residential real estate owned. Since year-end 2008, commercial real estate owned increased $16.4 million (with $20.4 million attributable to 9 larger commercial foreclosures, net of write-downs of $8 million on one large commercial property), while residential real estate owned decreased $3.5 million and bank properties real estate owned decreased by $1.6 million, for a net increase in other real estate owned of $11.3 million.

60


Table of Contents

Recent Regulatory Developments
As discussed in Note 16, “Subsequent Event – Recent Regulatory Developments,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements, our subsidiary bank has entered into an MOU with the OCC.
Liquidity
The objective of liquidity management is to ensure that the Corporation has the ability to generate sufficient cash or cash equivalents in a timely and cost-effective manner to satisfy the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers and to meet its other commitments as they fall due, including the ability to pay dividends to shareholders, service debt, invest in subsidiaries or acquisitions, repurchase common stock, and satisfy other operating requirements.
Funds are available from a number of basic banking activity sources, primarily from the core deposit base and from loans and investment securities repayments and maturities. Additionally, liquidity is provided from the sale of investment securities, lines of credit with major banks, the ability to acquire large, network, and brokered deposits, and the ability to securitize or package loans for sale. The Corporation regularly evaluates the creation of additional funding capacity based on market opportunities and conditions, as well as corporate funding needs and is currently exploring options to replace the subordinated note offering which matures in 2011. The Corporation’s capital can be a source of funding and liquidity as well (see section “Capital”). The current volatility and disruptions in the capital markets may impact the Corporation’s ability to access certain liquidity sources in the same manner as the Corporation had in the past.
The Corporation’s internal liquidity management framework includes measurement of several key elements, such as wholesale funding as a percent of total assets and liquid assets to short-term wholesale funding. Strong capital ratios, credit quality, and core earnings are essential to retaining high credit ratings and, consequently, cost-effective access to wholesale funding markets. A downgrade or loss in credit ratings could have an impact on the Corporation’s ability to access wholesale funding at favorable interest rates. As a result, capital ratios, asset quality measurements, and profitability ratios are monitored on an ongoing basis as part of the liquidity management process. At September 30, 2009, the Corporation was in compliance with its internal liquidity objectives.
While core deposits and loan and investment securities repayments are principal sources of liquidity, funding diversification is another key element of liquidity management. Diversity is achieved by strategically varying depositor type, term, funding market, and instrument. The Parent Company and its subsidiary bank are rated by Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”). Credit ratings by these nationally recognized statistical rating agencies are an important component of the Corporation’s liquidity profile. Credit ratings relate to the Corporation’s ability to issue debt securities and the cost to borrow money, and should not be viewed as an indication of future stock performance or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities. Among other factors, the credit ratings are based on financial strength, credit quality and concentrations in the loan portfolio, the level and volatility of earnings, capital adequacy, the quality of management, the liquidity of the balance sheet, the availability of a significant base of core deposits, and the Corporation’s ability to access a broad array of wholesale funding sources. Adverse changes in these factors could result in a negative change in credit ratings and impact not only the ability to raise funds in the capital markets, but also the cost of these funds. The Corporation’s credit rating was downgraded by S&P in May 2009 and the rating agencies continue to focus on the banking industry. Ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time and each rating should be evaluated independently. The current credit ratings of the Parent Company and its subsidiary bank are displayed below.
                                 
    September 30, 2009   December 31, 2008
         
Credit Ratings   Moody’s   S&P   Moody’s   S&P
         
Bank short-term
    P1       A2       P1       A2  
Bank long-term
    A1     BBB+     A1       A-  
Corporation short-term
    P1       A2       P1       A2  
Corporation long-term
    A2     BBB     A2     BBB+
Subordinated debt long-term
    A3     BBB-     A3     BBB
The Corporation also has funding sources that could be used to increase liquidity and provide additional financial flexibility. At September 30, 2009, $200 million of commercial paper was available under the

61


Table of Contents

Parent Company’s $200 million commercial paper program.
In December 2008, the Parent Company filed a “shelf” registration under which the Parent Company may offer any combination of the following securities, either separately or in units: trust preferred securities, debt securities, preferred stock, depositary shares, common stock, and warrants. In May 2002, $175 million of trust preferred securities were issued, bearing a 7.625% fixed coupon rate. In September 2008, the Parent Company issued $26 million in a subordinated note offering, bearing a 9.25% fixed coupon rate, 5-year no-call provision, and 10-year maturity, while in August 2001, the Parent Company issued $200 million in a subordinated note offering, bearing a 6.75% fixed coupon rate and 10-year maturity.
In November 2008, under the CPP, the Corporation issued 525,000 shares of Senior Preferred Stock (with a par value of $1.00 per share and a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share) and a 10-year warrant to purchase approximately 4.0 million shares of common stock (“Common Stock Warrants”), for aggregate proceeds of $525 million. The allocated carrying value of the Senior Preferred Stock and Common Stock Warrants on the date of issuance (based on their relative fair values) was $507.7 million and $17.3 million, respectively. Cumulative dividends on the Senior Preferred Stock are payable at 5% per annum for the first five years and at a rate of 9% per annum thereafter on the liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. The Common Stock Warrants have a term of 10 years and are exercisable at any time, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of $19.77 per share (subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments).
A bank note program associated with Associated Bank, National Association, (the “Bank”) was established during 2000. Under this program, short-term and long-term debt may be issued. As of September 30, 2009, no bank notes were outstanding and $225 million was available under the 2000 bank note program. A new bank note program was instituted during 2005, of which $2 billion was available at September 30, 2009. The 2005 bank note program will be utilized upon completion of the 2000 bank note program. The Bank has also established federal funds lines with major banks and the ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank ($1.0 billion of FHLB advances was outstanding at September 30, 2009). The Bank also issues institutional certificates of deposit, network deposits, brokered certificates of deposit, and accepts Eurodollar deposits.
Investment securities are an important tool to the Corporation’s liquidity objective. As of September 30, 2009, all investment securities are classified as available for sale and are reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. Of the $5.7 billion available for sale investment securities portfolio at September 30, 2009, $2.4 billion was pledged to secure certain deposits or for other purposes as required or permitted by law. The majority of the remaining securities could be pledged or sold to enhance liquidity, if necessary.
The FHLB of Chicago announced in October 2007 that it was under a consensual cease and desist order with its regulator, which among other things, restricts various future activities of the FHLB of Chicago. Such restrictions may stop the FHLB from redeeming stock without prior approval. The FHLB of Chicago last paid a dividend in the third quarter of 2007. The Bank is a member of the FHLB Chicago. Accounting guidance indicates that an investor in FHLB Chicago capital stock should recognize impairment if it concludes that it is not probable that it will ultimately recover the par value of its shares. The decision of whether impairment exists is a matter of judgment that should reflect the investor’s view of FHLB Chicago’s long-term performance, which includes factors such as its operating performance, the severity and duration of declines in the market value of its net assets related to its capital stock amount, its commitment to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to its operating performance, the impact of legislation and regulatory changes on FHLB Chicago, and accordingly, on the members of FHLB Chicago and its liquidity and funding position. After evaluating all of these considerations, the Corporation believes the cost of the investment will be recovered.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net cash provided by operating and investing activities was $0.1 billion and $0.9 billion, respectively, while financing activities used net cash of $1.1 billion, for a net

62


Table of Contents

decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $0.1 billion since year-end 2008. Generally, during the first nine months of 2009, net assets decreased $1.3 billion (5.4%), including a decrease in loans (down $1.5 billion), partially offset by an increase in investment securities (up $508 million). The $1.3 billion increase in deposits was predominantly used to fund the change in assets and repay wholesale funding as well as to provide for the payment of cash dividends to the Corporation’s stockholders.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, net cash provided by operating and financing activities was $0.4 billion and $0.7 billion, respectively, while investing activities used net cash of $1.0 billion, for a net increase in cash and cash equivalents of $0.1 billion since year-end 2007. Generally, during the first nine months of 2008, net assets increased $0.9 billion compared to year-end 2007, primarily in loans. Deposits and short-term borrowings were predominantly used to fund asset growth and repay long-term funding, as well as to provide for the payment of cash dividends to the Corporation’s stockholders.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, and Contingent Liabilities
The Corporation utilizes a variety of financial instruments in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers and to manage its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include lending-related commitments and derivative instruments. A discussion of the Corporation’s derivative instruments at September 30, 2009, is included in Note 11, “Derivative and Hedging Activities,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements. A discussion of the Corporation’s lending-related commitments is included in Note 12, “Commitments, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, and Contingent Liabilities,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements. See also Note 8, “Long-term Funding,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information on the Corporation’s long-term funding.
Table 10 summarizes significant contractual obligations and other commitments at September 30, 2009, at those amounts contractually due to the recipient, including any premiums or discounts, hedge basis adjustments, or other similar carrying value adjustments.
TABLE 10: Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
                                         
    One Year   One to   Three to   Over    
    or Less   Three Years   Five Years   Five Years   Total
    ($ in Thousands)
Time deposits
  $ 3,573,235     $ 787,404     $ 109,019     $ 579     $ 4,470,237  
Short-term borrowings
    1,517,594                         1,517,594  
Long-term funding
    617,505       899,802       97       244,102       1,761,506  
Operating leases
    11,764       19,270       13,324       14,751       59,109  
Commitments to extend credit
    3,462,570       867,931       183,408       58,531       4,572,440  
     
Total
  $ 9,182,668     $ 2,574,407     $ 305,848     $ 317,963     $ 12,380,886  
     
As discussed in Note 16, “Subsequent Event — Recent Regulatory Developments,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements, our subsidiary bank has entered into an MOU with the OCC. In connection with the MOU, the Corporation will commit to act as a primary or contingent source of capital to support the specified capital levels beginning March 31, 2010 until the MOU is no longer in effect. The dollar amount of this commitment, however, is uncertain at this time.
Capital
Stockholders’ equity at September 30, 2009 was $2.9 billion, minimally changed (up $48 million) from December 31, 2008. The change in stockholders’ equity between the two periods was primarily composed of the retention of earnings, with offsetting decreases to stockholders’ equity for the payment of cash dividends. Cash dividends of $0.42 per share were paid in the first nine months of 2009, compared to $0.95 per share in the first nine months of 2008. At September 30, 2009, stockholders’ equity included $64.9 million of accumulated other comprehensive income compared to $55,000 of accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2008. The $64.9 million improvement in accumulated other comprehensive income resulted primarily from the change in the unrealized gain/loss position, net of the tax effect, on investment securities available for sale (from unrealized gains of $36.6 million at December 31, 2008, to unrealized gains of $97.6 million at September 30, 2009), as well as a $3.5 million decrease in the unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of the tax effect. Stockholders’ equity to assets was 12.78% and 11.89% at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

63


Table of Contents

In November 2008, under the CPP, the Corporation issued 525,000 shares of Senior Preferred Stock (with a par value of $1.00 per share and a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share) and a 10-year warrant to purchase approximately 4.0 million shares of common stock (“Common Stock Warrants”), for aggregate proceeds of $525 million. The proceeds received were allocated between the Senior Preferred Stock and the Common Stock Warrants based upon their relative fair values, which resulted in the recording of a discount on the Senior Preferred Stock upon issuance that reflects the value allocated to the Common Stock Warrants. The discount will be accreted using a level-yield basis over five years. The allocated carrying value of the Senior Preferred Stock and Common Stock Warrants on the date of issuance (based on their relative fair values) was $507.7 million and $17.3 million, respectively. Cumulative dividends on the Senior Preferred Stock are payable at 5% per annum for the first five years and at a rate of 9% per annum thereafter on the liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. The Common Stock Warrants have a term of 10 years and are exercisable at any time, in whole or in part, at an exercise price of $19.77 per share (subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments).
The Board of Directors has authorized management to repurchase shares of the Corporation’s common stock to be made available for reissuance in connection with the Corporation’s employee incentive plans and/or for other corporate purposes. For the Corporation’s employee incentive plans, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 2.0 million shares per quarter, while under various actions, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of shares, not to exceed specified amounts of the Corporation’s outstanding shares per authorization (“block authorizations”). During 2008 and through September 30, 2009, no shares were repurchased under this authorization. At September 30, 2009, approximately 3.9 million shares remain authorized to repurchase under the block authorizations. The repurchase of shares will be based on market opportunities, capital levels, growth prospects, and other investment opportunities, and is subject to the restrictions under the CPP.
The Corporation regularly reviews the adequacy of its capital to ensure that sufficient capital is available for current and future needs and is in compliance with regulatory guidelines. The assessment of overall capital adequacy depends on a variety of factors, including asset quality, liquidity, stability of earnings, changing competitive forces, economic conditions in markets served and strength of management. The capital ratios of the Corporation and its banking affiliate are greater than minimums required by regulatory guidelines. The Corporation’s capital ratios are summarized in Table 11.

64


Table of Contents

TABLE 11
Capital Ratios
(In Thousands, except per share data)
                                         
    At or For the Quarter Ended
    Sept. 30,   June 30,   March 31,   Dec. 31,   Sept. 30,
    2009   2009   2009   2008   2008
 
Total stockholders’ equity
  $ 2,924,659     $ 2,873,768     $ 2,897,169     $ 2,876,503     $ 2,364,247  
Tier 1 capital
    2,103,581       2,098,647       2,115,120       2,117,680       1,614,247  
Total capital
    2,372,711       2,418,084       2,443,772       2,446,597       1,939,639  
Market capitalization
    1,460,207       1,598,263       1,975,437       2,674,059       2,546,538  
     
Book value per common share
  $ 18.88     $ 18.49     $ 18.68     $ 18.54     $ 18.52  
Tangible book value per common share
    11.38       10.97       11.15       10.99       10.96  
Cash dividend per common share
    0.05       0.05       0.32       0.32       0.32  
Stock price at end of period
    11.42       12.50       15.45       20.93       19.95  
Low closing price for the period
    9.21       12.50       10.60       15.72       14.85  
High closing price for the period
    12.67       19.00       21.39       24.21       25.92  
     
Total stockholders’ equity / assets
    12.78 %     11.97 %     11.90 %     11.89 %     10.51 %
Tangible common equity / tangible assets (1)
    6.64       6.09       6.10       6.05       6.50  
Tangible stockholders’ equity / tangible assets (2)
    8.96       8.30       8.27       8.23       6.50  
Tier 1 common equity / risk-weighted assets (3)
    8.67       8.21       7.91       7.90       8.05  
Tier 1 leverage ratio
    9.35       9.06       9.06       9.75       7.63  
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
    13.14       12.45       11.93       11.91       9.22  
Total risk-based capital ratio
    14.83       14.35       13.79       13.76       11.08  
     
Shares outstanding (period end)
    127,864       127,861       127,860       127,762       127,646  
Basic shares outstanding (average)
    127,863       127,861       127,839       127,717       127,553  
Diluted shares outstanding (average)
    127,863       127,861       127,845       127,810       127,622  
 
(1)   Tangible common equity to tangible assets = Common stockholders’ equity excluding goodwill and other intangible assets divided by assets excluding goodwill and other intangible assets. This is a non-GAAP financial measure.
 
(2)   Tangible stockholders’ equity to tangible assets = Total stockholders’ equity excluding goodwill and other intangible assets divided by assets excluding goodwill and other intangible assets. This is a non-GAAP financial measure.
 
(3)   Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets = Tier 1 capital excluding qualifying perpetual preferred stock and qualifying trust preferred securities divided by risk-weighted assets. This is a non-GAAP financial measure.
Comparable Third Quarter Results
Net income available to common equity for the third quarter of 2009 was $8.7 million, down $29.1 million from net income available to common equity of $37.8 million for the third quarter of 2008. Return on average equity was 2.19% for third quarter 2009 versus 6.38% for third quarter 2008, while return on average assets was 0.27% compared to 0.68% for third quarter 2008. Tables 1 through 10 present selected comparable quarter data.
Net interest income of $179.2 million for the third quarter of 2009, was up $12.7 million (7.6%) versus third quarter 2008, while taxable equivalent net interest income was $185.2 million, $11.8 million (6.8%) higher than the third quarter of 2008. The increase in taxable equivalent net interest income was attributable to a favorable volume variance (increasing taxable equivalent net interest income by $16.5 million), offset by an unfavorable rate variance (decreasing taxable equivalent net interest income by $4.7 million). See Tables 2 and 3. Average earning assets of $21.1 billion in the third quarter of 2009 increased $1.2 billion from the third quarter of 2008, with average loans down $0.9 billion and investments up $2.1 billion (58%). Average interest-bearing liabilities of $17.4 billion were up $0.3 billion from third quarter 2008, with average interest-bearing deposits up $2.1 billion (19%) and average wholesale funding down $1.8 billion (31%). On average, noninterest-bearing demand deposits (a principal component of net free funds) increased $0.4 billion (18%) from the third quarter of 2008.
The net interest margin of 3.50% was down 2 bp from 3.48% for the third quarter of 2008, the net result of a

65


Table of Contents

12 bp increase in the interest rate spread (i.e., a 96 bp decrease in the earning asset yield versus a 108 bp decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities) and a 10 bp lower contribution from net free funds (due principally to lower rates on interest-bearing liabilities reducing the value of noninterest-bearing deposits and other net free funds). The average Federal funds rate for third quarter 2009 was 175 bp lower than for third quarter 2008. On the asset side, average loans (yielding 4.80%, down 85 bp versus third quarter 2008) declined as a percentage of earning assets (72%, versus 81% for third quarter 2008), whereas average investments (yielding 4.16%, down 109 bp) represented a larger portion of earning assets (28%, versus 19% for third quarter 2008). On the funding side, average wholesale funding (costing 2.11% for third quarter 2009, down 81 bp) declined as a percentage of interest-bearing liabilities (to 23%, versus 34% for third quarter 2008), while interest-bearing deposits (costing 1.12%, down 107 bp) represented a larger portion of average interest-bearing liabilities (77%, versus 66% for third quarter 2008).
The provision for loan losses was $95.4 million (or $5.4 million greater than net charge offs) for the third quarter of 2009 versus $55.0 million (or $16.6 million greater than net charge offs) for the third quarter of 2008. Annualized net charge offs represented 2.34% of average loans for the third quarter of 2009 and 0.94% of average loans for the third quarter of 2008. The allowance for loan losses to loans at September 30, 2009 was 2.79% compared to 1.51% at September 30, 2008. Total nonperforming loans grew 191% to $886 million (6.00% of total loans) versus $305 million at September 30, 2008 (1.87% of total loans). See Table 8 and Table 9, as well as the discussion under sections “Provision for Loan Losses,” “Allowance for Loan Losses,” and “Nonperforming Loans and Other Real Estate Owned.”
Noninterest income was $75.3 million for the third quarter of 2009, relatively unchanged from $75.3 million for the third quarter of 2008 (see also Table 4). Core fee-based revenue was $66.5 million, down $4.6 million (6.4%) versus the third quarter of 2008 with declines in trust service fees (down 9.6%), service charges on deposit accounts (down 8.3%), and card-based and other nondeposit fees (down 7.4%). The decline in core fee-based revenue between the comparable third quarter periods was primarily the result of continued lower levels of consumer fee-based activity and lower asset management revenue due to the year-over-year equity market declines. Net mortgage banking income was down $4.5 million, with a $2.3 million increase in gross mortgage banking income and a $6.8 million increase in mortgage servicing rights expense. The $2.3 million increase in gross mortgage banking income was primarily attributable to higher gains on sales, while the $6.8 million increase in mortgage servicing rights expense was primarily attributable to a $5.5 million unfavorable change to the valuation reserve (i.e., a $4.7 million valuation addition in third quarter 2009 versus a $0.8 million valuation recovery for third quarter 2008). Treasury management fees decreased $1.7 million with decreases in interest rate risk related fees between the periods, BOLI income decreased $1.4 million, primarily attributable to lower crediting rates between the comparable third quarter periods, and other income decreased $0.7 million, with small decreases in various revenues (such as miscellaneous commissions and changes in the fair value of various limited ownership interests). Net losses on asset sales increased $0.7 million, primarily due to higher losses on sales of other real estate owned. Investment securities net losses decreased $13.5 million, with third quarter 2009 including gains of $1.1 million on the sale of mortgage-related securities and a credit-related other-than-temporary impairment of $1.1 million on the Corporation’s holding of a trust preferred debt security and a non-agency mortgage-related security, while third quarter 2008 net investment securities losses were attributable to other-than-temporary write-downs on the Corporation’s holding of various debt securities (including a $10.1 million write-down on two preferred stocks and a $3.5 million write-down on two trust preferred debt securities).
Noninterest expense for the third quarter of 2009 was $141.1 million, up $4.5 million (3.3%) over the third quarter of 2008 (see also Table 5). Personnel costs were down $4.9 million (6.2%), primarily attributable to a decrease in formal / discretionary bonuses, partially offset by higher base salaries and commissions (including merit increases between the years). Average full-time equivalent employees were 5,004 for third quarter 2009, down slightly (3%) from 5,141 for the comparable 2008 period. FDIC expense was up $7.7 million as the one-time assessment credit was exhausted and the assessment rate more than doubled in January 2009.

66


Table of Contents

Foreclosure/OREO expenses increased $6.3 million, primarily due to a general rise in foreclosure expenses (impacted by the continued deterioration of the real estate markets). All other noninterest expense categories were down $4.5 million (8.2%) on a combined basis, reflecting efforts to control selected discretionary expenses. Income tax expense for the third quarter of 2009 was $2.0 million compared to income tax expense of $12.5 million for the third quarter of 2008. The change in income tax expense is primarily due to the level of pretax income between the comparable three month periods.
TABLE 12
Selected Quarterly Information
($ in Thousands)
                                         
    For the Quarter Ended
    Sept. 30,   June 30,   March 31,   Dec. 31,   Sept. 30,
    2009   2009   2009   2008   2008
 
Summary of Operations:
                                       
Net interest income
  $ 179,236     $ 179,138     $ 189,278     $ 191,782     $ 166,517  
Provision for loan losses
    95,410       155,022       105,424       65,044       55,011  
Noninterest income
                                       
Trust service fees
    9,057       8,569       8,477       8,248       10,020  
Service charges on deposit accounts
    30,829       29,671       27,205       30,946       33,609  
Card-based and other nondeposit fees
    11,586       11,858       10,174       12,297       12,517  
Retail commission income
    15,041       14,829       15,512       15,541       14,928  
     
Core fee-based revenue
    66,513       64,927       61,368       67,032       71,074  
Mortgage banking, net
    (909 )     28,297       4,267       (1,227 )     3,571  
Treasury management fees, net
    226       2,393       2,626       (33 )     1,935  
BOLI income
    3,789       3,161       5,772       4,711       5,235  
Asset sale gains (losses), net
    (126 )     (1,287 )     (1,107 )     (1,054 )     573  
Investment securities gains (losses), net
    (42 )     (1,385 )     10,596       (35,298 )     (13,585 )
Other
    5,858       5,835       5,455       6,943       6,520  
     
Total noninterest income
    75,309       101,941       88,977       41,074       75,323  
Noninterest expense
                                       
Personnel expense
    73,501       81,171       77,098       77,374       78,395  
Occupancy
    11,949       12,341       12,881       13,134       12,037  
Equipment
    4,575       4,670       4,589       4,785       5,088  
Data processing
    7,442       8,126       7,597       7,446       7,634  
Business development and advertising
    3,910       4,943       4,737       6,047       5,175  
Other intangible asset amortization expense
    1,386       1,385       1,386       1,564       1,568  
Legal and professional fees
    3,349       5,586       4,241       5,311       3,538  
Foreclosure/OREO expense
    8,688       13,576       5,013       6,716       2,427  
FDIC expense
    8,451       18,090       5,775       930       791  
Other
    17,860       20,143       17,947       25,443       19,924  
     
Total noninterest expense
    141,111       170,031       141,264       148,750       136,577  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    2,030       (26,633 )     (11,158 )     2,203       12,483  
     
Net income (loss)
    15,994       (17,341 )     42,725       16,859       37,769  
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion
    7,342       7,331       7,321       3,250        
     
Net income (loss) available to common equity
  $ 8,652     $ (24,672 )   $ 35,404     $ 13,609     $ 37,769  
     
 
                                       
Taxable equivalent net interest income
  $ 185,174     $ 185,288     $ 195,822     $ 198,684     $ 173,416  
Net interest margin
    3.50 %     3.40 %     3.59 %     3.88 %     3.48 %
Effective tax rate (benefit)
    11.26 %     (60.57 %)     (35.35 %)     11.56 %     24.84 %
 
                                       
Average Balances:
                                       
Assets
  $ 23,362,954     $ 24,064,567     $ 24,255,783     $ 22,646,421     $ 22,072,948  
Earning assets
    21,063,016       21,847,267       21,959,077       20,436,483       19,884,434  
Interest-bearing liabilities
    17,412,341       18,125,389       18,457,879       17,363,481       17,107,551  
Loans
    15,248,895       16,122,063       16,430,347       16,285,881       16,203,717  
Deposits
    16,264,181       16,100,686       15,045,976       14,395,626       13,710,297  
Wholesale funding
    4,067,830       4,876,970       6,098,266       5,496,248       5,876,051  
Stockholders’ equity
    2,904,210       2,909,700       2,899,603       2,602,917       2,353,606  

67


Table of Contents

Sequential Quarter Results
Net income available to common equity for the third quarter of 2009 was $8.7 million, compared to a second quarter 2009 net loss available to common equity of $24.7 million. For the third quarter of 2009, return on average assets was 0.27% and return on average equity was 2.19%, compared to return on average assets of (0.29)% and return on average equity of (2.40)% for the second quarter of 2009 (see Table 1).
Taxable equivalent net interest income for the third quarter of 2009 was $185.2 million, $0.1 million lower than the second quarter of 2009. Changes in balance sheet volume and mix reduced taxable equivalent net interest income by $4.1 million, while shifts in the interest rate environment increased net interest income by $3.2 million and one extra day in the third quarter increased net interest income by $0.8 million. The Federal funds rate averaged 0.25% for both second and third quarter of 2009. The net interest margin between the sequential quarters was up 10 bp, to 3.50% in the third quarter of 2009, comprised of a 13 bp higher interest rate spread (to 3.26%, as the rate on interest-bearing liabilities fell 21 bp and the yield on earning assets declined 8 bp) and a 3 bp lower contribution from net free funds (to 0.24%, as lower rates on interest-bearing liabilities decreased the value of noninterest-bearing deposits and other net free funds). Average earning assets declined $0.8 billion to $21.1 billion in the third quarter of 2009, attributable to a decline in average loans (down $0.9 billion, predominantly in commercial loans), offset by growth in average investments (up $0.1 billion) over second quarter 2009. On the funding side, average interest-bearing deposits were up $0.1 billion, and average demand deposits were up $0.1 billion. On average, wholesale funding balances were down $0.8 billion, comprised of a $0.7 billion decrease in short-term borrowings and a $0.1 billion decrease in long-term funding.
Provision for loan losses for the third quarter of 2009 was $95.4 million (or $5.4 million greater than net charge offs), compared to $155.0 million (or $93.9 million greater than net charge offs) in the second quarter of 2009. Annualized net charge offs represented 2.34% of average loans for the third quarter of 2009 compared to 1.52% for the second quarter of 2009. Total nonperforming loans of $886 million (6.00% of total loans) at September 30, 2009 were up from $733 million (4.79% of total loans) at June 30, 2009, with commercial nonperforming loans up $124 million (primarily attributable to larger construction and other commercial credits directly impacted by the weak real estate market) to $744 million, and total consumer-related nonperforming loans up $29 million to $142 million (Table 9). The allowance for loan losses to loans at September 30, 2009 was 2.79%, compared to 2.66% at June 30, 2009. See discussion under sections, “Provision for Loan Losses,” “Allowance for Loan Losses,” and “Nonperforming Loans and Other Real Estate Owned.”
Noninterest income for the third quarter of 2009 decreased $26.6 million (26%) to $75.3 million versus second quarter 2009, including a $29.2 million decrease in net mortgage banking income and a $2.2 million decrease in Treasury management fees, offset by a $1.6 million increase in core fee-based revenues, a $2.5 million favorable swing in net gains (losses) on asset and investment sales combined, and a $0.6 million increase in BOLI income. Core fee-based revenues of $66.5 million were up $1.6 million (2.4%) versus second quarter 2009, with increases in service charges on deposit accounts (up 3.9%), trust service fees (up 5.7%), and retail commission income (up 1.4%), partially offset by lower card-based and other nondeposit fees (down 2.3%). Net mortgage banking was down $29.2 million from second quarter 2009, predominantly due to $14.0 million lower gains on sales and related income as well as a $14.9 million increase in mortgage servicing rights expense (primarily due to a $14.3 million unfavorable change in the valuation reserve, with third quarter 2009 including a $4.7 million valuation addition versus a $9.6 million valuation recovery in second quarter 2009).
On a sequential quarter basis, noninterest expense decreased $28.9 million (17.0%) to $141.1 million in the third quarter of 2009. Personnel expense was down $7.7 million (9.4%), primarily attributable to lower formal / discretionary bonuses and $1.7 million recognized in second quarter 2009 for an executive separation agreement. Average full-time equivalent employees were at 5,004 for third quarter 2009, down

68


Table of Contents

slightly (2%) from 5,116 for second quarter 2009. FDIC expense was down $9.6 million (53.3%) primarily attributable to an $11.3 million special assessment accrued in the second quarter of 2009. Foreclosure/OREO expense decreased $4.9 million (36.0%), due primarily to a $7 million write-down on a single foreclosed property during the second quarter of 2009. All other noninterest expense categories were down $6.7 million (11.8%) on a combined basis, reflecting efforts to control selected discretionary expenses. Income tax expense for the third quarter of 2009 was $2.0 million compared to income tax benefit of $26.6 million for second quarter 2009. The change in income tax expense / benefit is primarily due to the level of pretax income / loss between the sequential three month periods. In addition, the Corporation recorded a $5.0 million decrease in the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets in the second quarter of 2009.
Future Accounting Pronouncements
New accounting policies adopted by the Corporation are discussed in Note 3, “New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements. The expected impact of accounting policies recently issued or proposed but not yet required to be adopted are discussed below. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards materially affects the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable sections of this financial review and the notes to consolidated financial statements.
In August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard to provide additional guidance on measuring the fair value of liabilities under the fair value accounting standards (codified under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”). The quoted price for the identical liability, when traded as an asset in an active market, is also a Level 1 measurement for that liability when no adjustment to the quoted price is required. In the absence of a Level 1 measurement, a company must use a valuation technique that uses a quoted price or another valuation technique, such as using a market or income approach. This statement is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period ending after December 15, 2009. The Corporation will adopt the accounting standard in the fourth quarter of 2009, as required, and is in the process of assessing the impact on its results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which will require a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) for consolidation purposes. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the enterprise that has: (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This accounting standard will be effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009. The Corporation will adopt the accounting standard at the beginning of 2010, as required, and is in the process of assessing the impact on its results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which amends current generally accepted accounting principles related to the accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities, including the removal of the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity. This new accounting standard also clarifies that a transferor must evaluate whether it has maintained effective control of a financial asset by considering its continuing direct or indirect involvement with the transferred financial asset. This accounting standard will be effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009. The Corporation will adopt the accounting standard at the beginning of 2010, as required, and is in the process of assessing the impact on its results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.

69


Table of Contents

In December 2008, the FASB issued an accounting standard which will require additional disclosures about assets held in an employer’s defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan including fair values of each major asset category and level within the fair value hierarchy. This accounting standard will be effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The Corporation will adopt the accounting standard for year-end 2009, as required.
Subsequent Events
On October 28, 2009, the Board of Directors declared a $0.05 per share dividend payable on November 16, 2009, to shareholders of record as of November 6, 2009. This cash dividend has not been reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Corporation has not experienced any material changes to its market risk position since December 31, 2008, from that disclosed in the Corporation’s 2008 Form 10-K Annual Report.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
The Corporation maintains disclosure controls and procedures as required under Rule 13a-15 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Corporation’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation’s management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009. No changes were made to the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act of 1934) during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

70


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the updated risk factors below as well as the other information in our subsequent filings with the SEC, including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Regulatory oversight has increased – On November 5, 2009, Associated Bank, National Association (the “Bank”) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), its primary banking regulator. The MOU, which is an informal agreement between the Bank and the OCC, requires the Bank to develop, implement, and maintain various processes to improve the Bank’s risk management of its loan portfolio and a three year capital plan providing for maintenance of specified capital levels discussed below, notification to the OCC of dividends proposed to be paid to the Corporation, and the commitment of the Corporation to act as a primary or contingent source of the Bank’s capital. Management believes that it has satisfied a number of the conditions of the MOU and has commenced the steps necessary to resolve any and all remaining matters presented therein. The Bank has also agreed with the OCC that beginning March 31, 2010, until the MOU is no longer in effect, to maintain minimum capital ratios at specified levels higher than those otherwise required by applicable regulations as follows: Tier 1 capital to total average assets (leverage ratio)—8% and total capital to risk-weighted assets—12%. At September 30, 2009, the Bank’s capital ratios were 8.33% and 13.11%, respectively. As a result of the MOU, the Bank’s lending activities and capital levels are now subject to increased regulatory oversight. The terms of the MOU may affect our liquidity. In connection with the MOU, we committed to serve as a primary or contingent source of capital to the Bank to support the maintenance of the specified higher minimum capital ratios. The dollar amount of this commitment is uncertain at this time.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Following are the Corporation’s monthly common stock purchases during the third quarter of 2009. For a discussion of the common stock repurchase authorizations and repurchases during the period, see section “Capital” included under Part I Item 2 of this document.
                                 
                    Total Number of   Maximum Number of
    Total Number           Shares Purchased as   Shares that May Yet
    of Shares   Average Price   Part of Publicly   Be Purchased Under
Period   Purchased   Paid per Share   Announced Plans   the Plan
 
July 1 — July 31, 2009
    258     $ 10.14              
August 1 — August 31, 2009
                       
September 1 — September 30, 2009
                       
     
Total
    258     $ 10.14              
     
During the third quarter of 2009, the Corporation repurchased shares for minimum tax withholding settlements on equity compensation. The effect to the Corporation of this transaction was an increase in treasury stock and a decrease in cash of approximately $3,000 in the third quarter of 2009.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
  (a)   Exhibits:
 
      Exhibit (11), Statement regarding computation of per-share earnings. See Note 4 of the notes to consolidated financial statements in Part I Item 1.
 
      Exhibit (31.1), Certification Under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley by Paul S. Beideman, Chief Executive Officer, is attached hereto.
 
      Exhibit (31.2), Certification Under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley by Joseph B. Selner, Chief Financial Officer, is attached hereto.
 
      Exhibit (32), Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley, is attached hereto.

71


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
         
  ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP
(Registrant)
 
 
Date: November 9, 2009  /s/ Paul S. Beideman    
  Paul S. Beideman   
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   
     
Date: November 9, 2009  /s/ Joseph B. Selner    
  Joseph B. Selner   
  Chief Financial Officer   
 

72