Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
8-K - 8-K - Steadfast Apartment REIT, Inc. | a20200511star8-kerq12020.htm |
EXHIBIT 99.1
18100 Von Karman Avenue Suite 500 Irvine, CA 92612 949.852.0700 |
NEWS RELEASE
Contact: | Jennifer Franklin |
Phone: | 949.427.1385 |
Email: | jennifer@spotlightmarcom.com |
STEADFAST APARTMENT REIT, INC. ANNOUNCES
RESULTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2020
Irvine, Calif., May 14, 2020 — Steadfast Apartment REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) announced today its operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2020.
The Company was not materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic during the first fiscal quarter of 2020. The Company will continue to closely monitor the effects of COVID-19 on its residents, the employees of its advisor and property manager and vendors. The extent of the impact of COVID-19 on the Company's results of operations will depend, in part, on the duration of the pandemic, the success of efforts to contain it and the action taken in response to the outbreak, including government programs that provide financial support to mitigate the impact of COVID-19. Separately, the Mergers that closed on March 6, 2020 (described below), had a significant impact on our assets and liabilities and results of operations when compared to prior periods.
For the three months ended March 31, 2020, the Company had total revenues of $53.7 million compared to $42.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. Net loss was $9.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to $12.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. Total assets of the Company were $3.19 billion at March 31, 2020, and $1.43 billion at December 31, 2019.
Mergers with Steadfast Income REIT, Inc. and Steadfast Apartment REIT III, Inc.
On August 5, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with each of Steadfast Income REIT, Inc. (“SIR”) and Steadfast Apartment REIT III, Inc. (“STAR III”) whereby the Company would acquire SIR and STAR III in separate transactions (collectively, the "Mergers"). The Mergers closed on March 6, 2020, and each of SIR and STAR III merged into one of the Company’s newly formed, wholly-owned subsidiaries in a stock-for-stock transaction. Through the Mergers, the Company acquired 36 multifamily properties with 10,166 apartment homes and a 10% interest in one unconsolidated joint venture that owned 20 multifamily properties with a total of 4,584 apartment homes, which combined had a gross real estate value of approximately $1.5 billion. At the time of the Mergers, the combined company had approximately $3.4 billion in gross real estate assets. As of March 31, 2020, the combined
1
portfolio consisted of (1) 71 properties (including two properties held for the development of apartment homes) in 14 states and (2) a 10% interest in one unconsolidated joint venture that owned 20 multifamily properties.
First Quarter Operational Highlights:
The Company:
• | Through the Mergers, acquired 36 multifamily properties with 10,166 apartment homes and a 10% interest in one unconsolidated joint venture that owned 20 multifamily properties with a total of 4,584 apartment homes. |
• | Acquired two multifamily properties with a total of 468 apartment homes for an aggregate purchase price of $107.2 million. |
• | Received proceeds of $40.5 million from borrowing on the Company's master credit facility. |
• | Disposed of one multifamily property with 304 apartment homes and recognized a gain on sale of $11.4 million. |
• | Acquired land in Broomfield, CO for the development of new apartment homes. |
• | Invested $0.7 million in improvements to the Company's real estate held for development. |
• | Invested $1.2 million in improvements to the Company's real estate portfolio during the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. |
• | Had $221.0 million of variable rate debt with a weighted average interest rate of 2.97% and $1,755.8 million of fixed rate debt with a weighted average interest rate of 4.00% as of March 31, 2020. The weighted average interest rate on the Company's total outstanding debt was 3.89% as of March 31, 2020. |
• | Reported net cash provided by operating activities of $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. Net cash provided by investing activities was $51.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to $5.3 million used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2019. |
• | Reported net cash provided by financing activities of $28.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to $8.4 million used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2019, which included $6.7 million and $6.1 million of distributions paid, net of $5.1 million and $5.4 million in non-cash distributions paid pursuant to the Company's distribution reinvestment plan for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. |
• | Net operating income (“NOI”) increased to $30.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, from $24.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. (See the reconciliation of NOI to net loss and accompanying notes contained within this release for additional information on how the Company calculates NOI.) |
• | Experienced an increase in funds from operations ("FFO"), as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, to $7.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, from $5.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. (See the reconciliation of FFO to net loss and accompanying notes contained within this release for additional information on how the Company calculates FFO.) |
• | Experienced an increase in modified funds from operations ("MFFO"), as defined by the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives (formerly known as the Investment Program Association), to $7.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020, from $6.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. (See the reconciliation of MFFO |
2
to net loss and accompanying notes contained within this release for additional information on how the Company calculates MFFO.)
“The current crisis has people rethinking the way they work, shop, travel and gather,” said Ella Neyland, president of Steadfast Apartment REIT. “However, as people have been ‘sheltering in place’, it has reinforced the essential nature of the multifamily asset class. While we expect our operating results will be impacted for the remainder of 2020, we believe our portfolio of moderate income apartments are well positioned to navigate this unprecedented period.”
3
About Steadfast Apartment REIT, Inc.
Steadfast Apartment REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust that was formed to acquire and operate a diverse portfolio of well-positioned, institutional-quality apartment communities in targeted markets throughout the United States that have demonstrated high occupancy and income levels across market cycles.
Steadfast Apartment REIT, Inc. is sponsored by Steadfast REIT Investments, LLC, an affiliate of Steadfast Companies, an Orange County, California-based group of affiliated real estate investment and operating companies that acquire, develop and manage real estate in the U.S. and Mexico.
Forward-Looking Statements
This release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements,” as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and such statements are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided by the same. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of trends and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements; the Company can give no assurance that its expectations will be attained. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s expectations include, but are not limited to, risks related to the economic impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on our residents and employees of our advisor and property manager and the general economy; the availability of suitable investment opportunities; changes in interest rates; the availability and terms of financing; general economic conditions; market conditions; legislative and regulatory changes that could adversely affect the business of the Company; and other factors, including those set forth in the Risk Factors section of the Company’s public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and other reports filed by the Company with the SEC, copies of which are available on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these statements for revisions or changes after the date of this release, except as required by law.
THIS PRESS RELEASE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY SECURITIES.
###
FINANCIAL TABLES, NOTES AND EXHIBITS FOLLOW
4
STEADFAST APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 | ||||||
ASSETS | |||||||
Assets: | |||||||
Real Estate: | |||||||
Land | $ | 336,766,137 | $ | 151,294,208 | |||
Building and improvements | 2,832,836,151 | 1,369,256,465 | |||||
Tenant origination and absorption costs | 39,716,257 | — | |||||
Total real estate held for investment, cost | 3,209,318,545 | 1,520,550,673 | |||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (305,599,544 | ) | (277,033,046 | ) | |||
Total real estate held for investment, net | 2,903,719,001 | 1,243,517,627 | |||||
Real estate held for development | 15,870,392 | 5,687,977 | |||||
Real estate held for sale, net | — | 21,665,762 | |||||
Total real estate, net | 2,919,589,393 | 1,270,871,366 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 215,105,801 | 74,806,649 | |||||
Restricted cash | 18,635,695 | 73,614,452 | |||||
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture | 21,975,498 | — | |||||
Rents and other receivables | 4,922,665 | 2,032,774 | |||||
Assets related to real estate held for sale | — | 118,570 | |||||
Other assets | 7,597,827 | 5,513,315 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 3,187,826,879 | $ | 1,426,957,126 | |||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 52,782,874 | $ | 30,265,713 | |||
Notes payable: | |||||||
Mortgage notes payable, net | 1,388,449,438 | 560,098,815 | |||||
Credit facility, net | 588,344,120 | 548,460,230 | |||||
Total notes payable, net | 1,976,793,558 | 1,108,559,045 | |||||
Distributions payable | 8,356,638 | 4,021,509 | |||||
Due to affiliates | 8,022,867 | 7,305,570 | |||||
Liabilities related to real estate held for sale | — | 788,720 | |||||
Total liabilities | 2,045,955,937 | 1,150,940,557 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||
Redeemable common stock | 1,889,463 | 1,202,711 | |||||
Stockholders’ Equity: | |||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding | — | — | |||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 999,998,000 shares authorized, 108,898,231 and 52,607,695 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively | 1,088,982 | 526,077 | |||||
Convertible stock, $0.01 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized, zero and 1,000 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively | — | 10 | |||||
Class A Convertible stock, $0.01 par value per share; 1,000 shares authorized, 1,000 and zero shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively | 10 | — | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,588,131,358 | 698,453,981 | |||||
Cumulative distributions and net losses | (449,238,871 | ) | (424,166,210 | ) | |||
Total stockholders’ equity | 1,139,981,479 | 274,813,858 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 3,187,826,879 | $ | 1,426,957,126 |
5
STEADFAST APARTMENT REIT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2020 | 2019 | ||||||
Revenues: | |||||||
Rental income | $ | 53,266,672 | $ | 42,316,920 | |||
Other income | 447,267 | 268,307 | |||||
Total revenues | 53,713,939 | 42,585,227 | |||||
Expenses: | |||||||
Operating, maintenance and management | 12,496,559 | 10,058,274 | |||||
Real estate taxes and insurance | 8,743,446 | 6,581,189 | |||||
Fees to affiliates | 8,427,296 | 6,065,648 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 28,575,896 | 18,282,293 | |||||
Interest expense | 14,390,954 | 12,233,295 | |||||
General and administrative expenses | 2,430,299 | 1,864,269 | |||||
Total expenses | 75,064,450 | 55,084,968 | |||||
Loss before other income (expenses) | (21,350,511 | ) | (12,499,741 | ) | |||
Other income (expenses): | |||||||
Gain on sales of real estate, net | 11,384,599 | — | |||||
Interest income | 253,254 | 178,678 | |||||
Insurance proceeds in excess of losses incurred | 66,723 | 3,400 | |||||
Equity in loss from unconsolidated joint venture | (35,193 | ) | — | ||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | — | (41,609 | ) | ||||
Total other income | 11,669,383 | 140,469 | |||||
Net loss | $ | (9,681,128 | ) | $ | (12,359,272 | ) | |
Loss per common share — basic and diluted | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — basic and diluted | 68,180,512 | 51,873,832 |
6
Steadfast Apartment REIT, Inc.
Non-GAAP Measures - FFO and MFFO Reconciliation
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"), an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as funds from operations, or FFO, which the Company believes to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a real estate investment trust ("REIT"). The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to the Company's net income or loss as determined under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").
The Company defines FFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in December 2018 (the “White Paper”). The White Paper defines FFO as net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property and non-cash impairment charges of real estate related investments, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. In particular, the Company believes it is appropriate to disregard impairment charges, as this is a fair value adjustment that is largely based on market fluctuations and assessments regarding general market conditions which can change over time. An asset will only be evaluated for impairment if certain impairment indications exist and if the carrying, or book value, exceeds the total estimated undiscounted future cash flows (including net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP) from such asset. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, investors are cautioned that due to the fact that impairments are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows and the relatively limited term of the Company's operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges. The Company's FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s policy described above.
The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, especially if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or as requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. The Company believes that since real estate values
7
historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, the Company believes that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate related depreciation and amortization, provides a more complete understanding of its performance to investors and to the Company's management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on its operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases, or ASU 2016-02, on January 1, 2019, which requires the Company, as a lessee, to recognize a liability for obligations under a lease contract and a right-of-use asset. ASU 2017-01 now forms part of ASC 805, Business Combinations ("ASC 805"). The carrying amount of the right-of-use asset is amortized over the term of the lease. Because the Company has no ownership rights (current or residual) in the underlying asset, NAREIT concluded that the amortization of the right-of-use asset should not be added back to GAAP net income (loss) in calculating FFO. This amortization expense is included in FFO. However, FFO, and modified funds from operations, or MFFO as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating the Company's operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.
Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP (for acquisition fees and expenses from a capitalization/depreciation model to an expensed-as-incurred model) that were put into effect in 2009 and other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses for all industries as items that are expensed under GAAP, that are typically accounted for as operating expenses. The Company's management believes these fees and expenses do not affect the Company's overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. While other start-up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, the Company believes that public, non-listed REITs, like the Company, are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after acquisition activity ceases.
8
Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Institute for Portfolio Alternatives ("IPA"), an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO, which it has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered non-listed REITs and which the Company believes to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a public, non-listed REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to net income or loss as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if the Company does not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. The Company believes that, because MFFO excludes costs that it considers more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO and also excludes acquisition fees and expenses that are not capitalized, as discussed below, and affects its operations only in periods in which properties are acquired, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of its operating performance after the period in which it is acquiring properties and once its portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, the Company believes it is presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of its operating performance after its offering has been completed and its properties have been acquired. The Company also believes that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the non-listed REIT industry. Further, the Company believes MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of its operating performance after its offering and acquisitions are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. Investors are cautioned that MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of the Company's operating performance after its offering has been completed and properties have been acquired, as it excludes acquisition costs that have a negative effect on the Company's operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.
The Company defines MFFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, consistent with the IPA’s Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations (the Practice Guideline), issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items, as applicable, included in the determination of GAAP net income: acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of above and below market leases and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments); accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated
9
partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, nonrecurring unrealized gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income in calculating the cash flows provided by operating activities and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized. While the Company relies on its external advisor for managing interest rate, hedge and foreign exchange risk, the Company does not retain an outside consultant to review all of its hedging agreements. Inasmuch as interest rate hedges are not a fundamental part of the Company's operations, the Company believes it is appropriate to exclude such non-recurring gains and losses in calculating MFFO, as such gains and losses are not reflective of on-going operations.
The Company's MFFO calculation complies with the IPA's Practice Guideline described above, except with respect to certain acquisition fees and expenses as discussed below. In calculating MFFO, the Company excludes acquisition related expenses, amortization of above and below market leases, fair value adjustments of derivative financial instruments, deferred rent receivables and the adjustments of such items related to noncontrolling interests. Historically under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses were characterized as operating expenses in determining operating net income. However, following the publication of ASU 2017-01, which now forms part of ASC 805, acquisition fees and expenses are capitalized and depreciated under certain conditions. These expenses are paid in cash by the Company. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by the Company, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. The acquisition of properties, and the corresponding acquisition fees and expenses, is the key operational feature of the Company's business plan to generate operational income and cash flow to fund distributions to stockholders. Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income in determining cash flow from operating activities. In addition, the Company views fair value adjustments of derivatives and gains and losses from dispositions of assets as non-recurring items or items which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized, and which are not reflective of on-going operations and are therefore typically adjusted for when assessing operating performance.
The Company's management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate MFFO in order to evaluate the Company's performance against other public, non-listed REITs which have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if the Company does not continue to operate in this manner. The Company believes that its use
10
of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate MFFO allow the Company to present its performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to public, non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence that the use of such measures is useful to investors. By excluding expensed acquisition costs that are not capitalized, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with the Company's management's analysis of the operating performance of the properties. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to the Company's current operating performance. By excluding such changes that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, the Company believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information.
Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance to that of other public, non-listed REITs, although it should be noted that not all public, non-listed REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other public, non-listed REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as an indication of the Company's performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of the Company's liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund the Company's cash needs, including the Company's ability to make distributions to stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with GAAP measurements as an indication of the Company's performance. MFFO is useful in assisting the Company's management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and net asset value is disclosed. MFFO is not a useful measure in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining MFFO.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that the Company uses to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-listed REIT industry and in response to such standardization the Company may have to adjust its calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO accordingly.
11
The Company's calculation of FFO and MFFO is presented in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Reconciliation of net loss to MFFO: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (9,681,128 | ) | $ | (12,359,272 | ) | ||
Depreciation of real estate assets | 22,751,822 | 18,282,293 | ||||||
Amortization of lease-related costs(1) | 5,822,805 | — | ||||||
Gain on sales of real estate, net | (11,384,599 | ) | — | |||||
Adjustments for investment in unconsolidated joint venture(2) | 169,483 | — | ||||||
FFO | 7,678,383 | 5,923,021 | ||||||
Acquisition fees and expenses(3)(4) | 13,148 | 358,757 | ||||||
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments | 2,251 | 179,616 | ||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | — | 41,609 | ||||||
Amortization of below market leases | (922 | ) | — | |||||
MFFO | $ | 7,692,860 | $ | 6,503,003 |
_____________
(1) | Amortization of lease-related costs for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, exclude amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets of $1,269 and $0 that is included in FFO, respectively. |
(2) | Reflects adjustments to add back our noncontrolling interest share of the adjustments to reconcile the Company's net loss attributable to common stockholders to FFO for the Company's equity investment in the unconsolidated joint venture, which principally consists of depreciation and amortization incurred by the Company's joint venture. |
(3) | By excluding expensed acquisition costs that are not capitalized, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management’s analysis of the investing and operating performance of the Company's properties. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to the Company's advisor or third parties. Historically under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses were considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income (loss) and income (loss) from continuing operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. Following the publication of ASU 2017-01, which now forms part of ASC 805, acquisition fees and expenses are capitalized and depreciated under certain conditions. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by the Company, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to the property. The acquisition of properties, and the |
12
corresponding acquisition fees and expenses, is the key operational feature of the Company's business plan to generate operational income and cash flow to fund distributions to its stockholders.
(4) | Acquisition fees and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 include acquisition expenses of $13,148 and $358,757, respectively, that did not meet the criteria for capitalization under ASU 2017-01, which now forms part of ASC 805, and were recorded in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. These expenses largely pertained to the then-proposed SIR Merger and STAR III Merger and were incurred and expensed through the date of the Merger Agreement. Upon signing the Merger Agreement, merger related acquisition expenses met the definition of capitalized expenses and were therefore capitalized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets thereby not impacting MFFO. Also included in expensed acquisition expenses are acquisition expenses related to real estate projects that did not come to fruition. |
13
Steadfast Apartment REIT, Inc.
Non-GAAP Measures - Net Operating Income
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019
NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure of performance. NOI is used by investors and the Company's management to evaluate and compare the performance of the Company's properties, to determine trends in earnings and to compute the fair value of the Company's properties as it is not affected by (1) the cost of funds of the Company, (2) acquisition costs of the Company, (3) non-operating fees to affiliates, (4) the impact of depreciation and amortization expenses as well as gains or losses from the sale of operating real estate assets that are included in net income computed in accordance with GAAP, or (5) general and administrative expenses and other gains and losses that are specific to the Company. The cost of funds is eliminated from net income (loss) because it is specific to the particular financing capabilities and constraints of the Company. The cost of funds is also eliminated because it is dependent on historical interest rates and other costs of capital as well as past decisions made by the Company regarding the appropriate mix of capital which may have changed or may change in the future. Acquisition costs (those that did not meet the criteria for capitalization under ASC 805) and non-operating fees to affiliates are eliminated because they do not reflect continuing operating costs of the property owner.
Depreciation and amortization expenses as well as gains or losses from the sale of operating real estate assets are eliminated because they may not accurately represent the actual change in value in the Company's multifamily properties that result from use of the properties or changes in market conditions. While certain aspects of real property do decline in value over time in a manner that is reasonably captured by depreciation and amortization, the value of the properties as a whole have historically increased or decreased as a result of changes in overall economic conditions instead of from actual use of the property or the passage of time. Gains and losses from the sale of real property vary from property to property and are affected by market conditions at the time of sale which will usually change from period to period. These gains and losses can create distortions when comparing one period to another or when comparing the Company's operating results to the operating results of other real estate companies that have not made similarly timed purchases or sales. The Company believes that eliminating these costs from net (loss) income is useful because the resulting measure captures the actual revenue generated and actual expenses incurred in operating its properties as well as trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs.
However, the usefulness of NOI is limited because it excludes general and administrative costs, interest expense, interest income and other expense, acquisition costs (those that did not meet the criteria for capitalization under ASC 805), certain fees paid to affiliates, depreciation and amortization expense and gains or losses from the sale of properties, and other gains and losses as stipulated by GAAP, the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating
14
performance of the Company's properties, all of which are significant economic costs. NOI may fail to capture significant trends in these components of net income which further limits its usefulness.
NOI is a measure of the operating performance of the Company's properties but does not measure the Company's performance as a whole. NOI is therefore not a substitute for net income (loss) as computed in accordance with GAAP. This measure should be analyzed in conjunction with net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP. Other companies may use different methods for calculating NOI or similarly entitled measures and, accordingly, the Company's NOI may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures reported by other companies that do not define the measure exactly as the Company does.
The following is a reconciliation of the Company's NOI to net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 and computed in accordance with GAAP:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (9,681,128 | ) | $ | (12,359,272 | ) | ||
Fees to affiliates(1) | 5,843,389 | 4,160,152 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 28,575,896 | 18,282,293 | ||||||
Interest expense | 14,390,954 | 12,233,295 | ||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | — | 41,609 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses | 2,430,299 | 1,864,269 | ||||||
Gain on sale of real estate | (11,384,599 | ) | — | |||||
Other gains(2) | (319,977 | ) | (182,078 | ) | ||||
Adjustments for investment in unconsolidated joint venture(3) | 270,191 | — | ||||||
Net operating income | $ | 30,125,025 | $ | 24,040,268 |
________________
(1) | Fees to affiliates for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 exclude property management fees of $1,496,370 and $1,234,277 and other reimbursements of $1,087,537 and $671,219, respectively, that are included in NOI. |
(2) | Other gains for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 include non-recurring insurance claim recoveries and interest income that are not included in NOI. |
(3) Reflects adjustments to add back the Company's noncontrolling interest share of the adjustments to reconcile the Company's net loss attributable to common stockholders to NOI for the Company's equity investment in the unconsolidated joint venture, which principally consists of depreciation, amortization and interest expense incurred by the Company's joint venture.
15
EXHIBIT A
MONTHLY PORTFOLIO SNAPSHOT - 1ST QUARTER
Monthly Portfolio Snapshot | JANUARY 2020 | |||||||||||||
Property | Location | Total Units | Non-Revenue Units | Rentable Units | Average Occupied Units | Average % Occupied | % Leased | |||||||
Multi-Family | ||||||||||||||
Villages at Spring Hill Apartments | Spring Hill, TN | 176 | – | 176 | 165 | 93.8% | 95.8% | |||||||
Harrison Place Apartments | Indianapolis, IN | 307 | 1 | 306 | 290 | 94.5% | 95.7% | |||||||
Terrace Cove Apartment Homes | Austin, TX | 304 | 2 | 302 | 287 | 94.4% | 96.5% | |||||||
The Residences on McGinnis Ferry | Suwanee, GA | 696 | 1 | 695 | 659 | 94.7% | 95.8% | |||||||
The 1800 at Barrett Lakes | Kennesaw, GA | 500 | 1 | 499 | 471 | 94.2% | 96.6% | |||||||
The Oasis | Colorado Springs, CO | 252 | 1 | 251 | 236 | 93.7% | 94.6% | |||||||
Columns on Wetherington | Florence, KY | 192 | – | 192 | 174 | 90.6% | 92.7% | |||||||
Preston Hills at Mill Creek | Buford, GA | 464 | 2 | 462 | 428 | 92.2% | 94.0% | |||||||
Eagle Lake Landing Apartments | Speedway, IN | 277 | – | 277 | 270 | 97.5% | 98.8% | |||||||
Reveal on Cumberland | Fishers, IN | 220 | 1 | 219 | 205 | 93.2% | 94.6% | |||||||
Heritage Place Apartments | Franklin, TN | 105 | – | 105 | 101 | 96.2% | 96.7% | |||||||
Rosemont at East Cobb | Marietta, GA | 180 | 1 | 179 | 171 | 95.0% | 96.7% | |||||||
Ridge Crossings Apartments | Birmingham, AL | 720 | 1 | 719 | 681 | 94.6% | 95.7% | |||||||
Bella Terra at City Center | Aurora, CO | 304 | 1 | 303 | 287 | 94.4% | 95.6% | |||||||
Hearthstone at City Center | Aurora, CO | 360 | 1 | 359 | 342 | 95.0% | 96.3% | |||||||
Arbors at Brookfield | Mauldin, SC | 702 | 3 | 699 | 648 | 92.3% | 94.2% | |||||||
Carrington Park | Kansas City, MO | 298 | 1 | 297 | 283 | 95.0% | 95.9% | |||||||
Delano at North Richland Hills | North Richland Hills, TX | 263 | 1 | 262 | 253 | 96.2% | 97.8% | |||||||
Meadows at North Richland Hills | North Richland Hills, TX | 252 | 1 | 251 | 235 | 93.3% | 94.8% | |||||||
Kensington by the Vineyard | Euless, TX | 259 | 1 | 258 | 249 | 96.1% | 97.1% | |||||||
Monticello by the Vineyard | Euless, TX | 354 | 1 | 353 | 340 | 96.0% | 96.8% | |||||||
The Shores | Oklahoma City, OK | 300 | 1 | 299 | 282 | 94.0% | 95.7% | |||||||
Lakeside at Coppell | Coppell, TX | 315 | 1 | 314 | 304 | 96.5% | 96.9% | |||||||
Meadows at River Run | Bolingbrook, IL | 374 | 1 | 373 | 340 | 90.9% | 91.5% | |||||||
Park Valley Apartments | Smyrna, GA | 496 | 1 | 495 | 472 | 95.2% | 96.5% | |||||||
PeakView at T-Bone Ranch | Greeley, CO | 224 | 1 | 223 | 210 | 93.8% | 94.8% | |||||||
PeakView by Horseshoe Lake | Loveland, CO | 222 | 1 | 221 | 211 | 95.0% | 96.3% | |||||||
Stoneridge Farms | Smyrna, TN | 336 | 1 | 335 | 324 | 96.4% | 97.1% | |||||||
Fielder's Creek | Englewood, CO | 217 | 1 | 216 | 207 | 95.4% | 96.7% | |||||||
Landings of Brentwood | Brentwood, TN | 724 | 1 | 723 | 697 | 96.3% | 97.3% | |||||||
1250 West Apartments | Marietta, GA | 468 | 1 | 467 | 441 | 94.2% | 95.1% | |||||||
Sixteen50 @ Lake Ray Hubbard | Rockwall, TX | 334 | 1 | 333 | 321 | 96.1% | 97.3% | |||||||
Eleven10 at Farmers Market | Dallas, TX | 313 | 2 | 311 | 296 | 94.6% | 95.7% | |||||||
Total | 11,508 | 34 | 11,474 | 10,880 | 94.5% | 95.8% | ||||||||
Commercial Space | ||||||||||||||
Storage | Location | Total Units | Total Storage Units | Occupied Storage Units | % Occupied | |||||||||
Park Valley Commercial | Smyrna, GA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | |||||||||
16
Monthly Portfolio Snapshot | FEBRUARY 2020 | |||||||||||||
Property | Location | Total Units | Non-Revenue Units | Rentable Units | Average Occupied Units | Average % Occupied | % Leased | |||||||
Multi-Family | ||||||||||||||
Villages at Spring Hill Apartments | Spring Hill, TN | 176 | – | 176 | 167 | 94.9% | 95.2% | |||||||
Harrison Place Apartments | Indianapolis, IN | 307 | 1 | 306 | 291 | 94.8% | 95.6% | |||||||
The Residences on McGinnis Ferry | Suwanee, GA | 696 | 1 | 695 | 657 | 94.4% | 95.5% | |||||||
The 1800 at Barrett Lakes | Kennesaw, GA | 500 | 1 | 499 | 478 | 95.6% | 97.2% | |||||||
The Oasis | Colorado Springs, CO | 252 | 1 | 251 | 238 | 94.4% | 96.3% | |||||||
Columns on Wetherington | Florence, KY | 192 | – | 192 | 174 | 90.6% | 92.0% | |||||||
Preston Hills at Mill Creek | Buford, GA | 464 | 2 | 462 | 432 | 93.1% | 94.7% | |||||||
Eagle Lake Landing Apartments | Speedway, IN | 277 | – | 277 | 264 | 95.3% | 96.7% | |||||||
Reveal on Cumberland | Fishers, IN | 220 | 1 | 219 | 205 | 93.2% | 94.8% | |||||||
Heritage Place Apartments | Franklin, TN | 105 | – | 105 | 102 | 97.1% | 97.9% | |||||||
Rosemont at East Cobb | Marietta, GA | 180 | 1 | 179 | 172 | 95.6% | 96.6% | |||||||
Ridge Crossings Apartments | Birmingham, AL | 720 | 1 | 719 | 679 | 94.3% | 95.1% | |||||||
Bella Terra at City Center | Aurora, CO | 304 | 1 | 303 | 286 | 94.1% | 95.6% | |||||||
Hearthstone at City Center | Aurora, CO | 360 | 1 | 359 | 345 | 95.8% | 96.6% | |||||||
Arbors at Brookfield | Mauldin, SC | 702 | 2 | 700 | 650 | 92.6% | 94.5% | |||||||
Carrington Park | Kansas City, MO | 298 | 1 | 297 | 282 | 94.6% | 95.0% | |||||||
Delano at North Richland Hills | North Richland Hills, TX | 263 | 1 | 262 | 254 | 96.6% | 97.5% | |||||||
Meadows at North Richland Hills | North Richland Hills, TX | 252 | 1 | 251 | 236 | 93.7% | 94.5% | |||||||
Kensington by the Vineyard | Euless, TX | 259 | 1 | 258 | 246 | 95.0% | 96.5% | |||||||
Monticello by the Vineyard | Euless, TX | 354 | 1 | 353 | 335 | 94.6% | 95.9% | |||||||
The Shores | Oklahoma City, OK | 300 | 1 | 299 | 282 | 94.0% | 95.1% | |||||||
Lakeside at Coppell | Coppell, TX | 315 | 1 | 314 | 297 | 94.3% | 95.0% | |||||||
Meadows at River Run | Bolingbrook, IL | 374 | 1 | 373 | 339 | 90.6% | 91.5% | |||||||
Park Valley Apartments | Smyrna, GA | 496 | 1 | 495 | 462 | 93.1% | 95.0% | |||||||
PeakView at T-Bone Ranch | Greeley, CO | 224 | 1 | 223 | 206 | 92.0% | 93.1% | |||||||
PeakView by Horseshoe Lake | Loveland, CO | 222 | 1 | 221 | 209 | 94.1% | 94.8% | |||||||
Stoneridge Farms | Smyrna, TN | 336 | 1 | 335 | 319 | 94.9% | 95.8% | |||||||
Fielder's Creek | Englewood, CO | 217 | 1 | 216 | 203 | 93.5% | 95.0% | |||||||
Landings of Brentwood | Brentwood, TN | 724 | 1 | 723 | 696 | 96.1% | 97.3% | |||||||
1250 West Apartments | Marietta, GA | 468 | 1 | 467 | 442 | 94.4% | 95.7% | |||||||
Sixteen50 @ Lake Ray Hubbard | Rockwall, TX | 334 | 1 | 333 | 320 | 95.8% | 96.8% | |||||||
Eleven10 at Farmers Market | Dallas, TX | 313 | 2 | 311 | 296 | 94.6% | 95.2% | |||||||
Patina Flats | Loveland, CO | 155 | – | 155 | 146 | 94.2% | 95.4% | |||||||
Total | 11,359 | 31 | 11,328 | 10,710 | 94.3% | 95.5% | ||||||||
Commercial Space | ||||||||||||||
Storage | Location | Total Units | Total Storage Units | Occupied Storage Units | % Occupied | |||||||||
Park Valley Commercial | Smyrna, GA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | |||||||||
Retail | Location | Total Units | Total Square Footage | Occupied Square Footage | % Occupied | |||||||||
Patina Flats | Loveland, CO | 7 | 15,026 | 5,221 | 34.7% | |||||||||
17
Monthly Portfolio Snapshot | MARCH 2020 | |||||||||||||
Property | Location | Total Units | Non-Revenue Units | Rentable Units | Average Occupied Units | Average % Occupied | % Leased | |||||||
Multi-Family | ||||||||||||||
Villages at Spring Hill Apartments | Spring Hill, TN | 176 | – | 176 | 167 | 94.9% | 95.8% | |||||||
Harrison Place Apartments | Indianapolis, IN | 307 | 1 | 306 | 287 | 93.5% | 94.8% | |||||||
The Residences on McGinnis Ferry | Suwanee, GA | 696 | 1 | 695 | 656 | 94.3% | 95.8% | |||||||
The 1800 at Barrett Lakes | Kennesaw, GA | 500 | 1 | 499 | 469 | 93.8% | 94.9% | |||||||
The Oasis | Colorado Springs, CO | 252 | – | 252 | 240 | 95.2% | 96.9% | |||||||
Columns on Wetherington | Florence, KY | 192 | – | 192 | 175 | 91.1% | 93.3% | |||||||
Preston Hills at Mill Creek | Buford, GA | 464 | 2 | 462 | 433 | 93.3% | 94.5% | |||||||
Eagle Lake Landing Apartments | Speedway, IN | 277 | – | 277 | 260 | 93.9% | 97.1% | |||||||
Reveal on Cumberland | Fishers, IN | 220 | 1 | 219 | 203 | 92.3% | 94.1% | |||||||
Heritage Place Apartments | Franklin, TN | 105 | – | 105 | 101 | 96.2% | 96.7% | |||||||
Rosemont at East Cobb | Marietta, GA | 180 | 1 | 179 | 172 | 95.6% | 97.6% | |||||||
Ridge Crossings Apartments | Birmingham, AL | 720 | 1 | 719 | 675 | 93.8% | 94.7% | |||||||
Bella Terra at City Center | Aurora, CO | 304 | 1 | 303 | 292 | 96.1% | 96.9% | |||||||
Hearthstone at City Center | Aurora, CO | 360 | – | 360 | 341 | 94.7% | 96.4% | |||||||
Arbors at Brookfield | Mauldin, SC | 702 | 2 | 700 | 651 | 92.7% | 94.2% | |||||||
Carrington Park | Kansas City, MO | 298 | 1 | 297 | 282 | 94.6% | 95.3% | |||||||
Delano at North Richland Hills | North Richland Hills, TX | 263 | 1 | 262 | 250 | 95.1% | 96.5% | |||||||
Meadows at North Richland Hills | North Richland Hills, TX | 252 | 1 | 251 | 235 | 93.3% | 94.4% | |||||||
Kensington by the Vineyard | Euless, TX | 259 | 1 | 258 | 248 | 95.8% | 96.3% | |||||||
Monticello by the Vineyard | Euless, TX | 354 | 1 | 353 | 328 | 92.7% | 94.3% | |||||||
The Shores | Oklahoma City, OK | 300 | 1 | 299 | 283 | 94.3% | 95.6% | |||||||
Lakeside at Coppell | Coppell, TX | 315 | 1 | 314 | 299 | 94.9% | 95.5% | |||||||
Meadows at River Run | Bolingbrook, IL | 374 | 1 | 373 | 337 | 90.1% | 92.2% | |||||||
Park Valley Apartments | Smyrna, GA | 496 | 1 | 495 | 462 | 93.1% | 95.1% | |||||||
PeakView at T-Bone Ranch | Greeley, CO | 224 | 1 | 223 | 210 | 93.8% | 95.8% | |||||||
PeakView by Horseshoe Lake | Loveland, CO | 222 | 1 | 221 | 208 | 93.7% | 94.3% | |||||||
Stoneridge Farms | Smyrna, TN | 336 | 1 | 335 | 312 | 92.9% | 94.3% | |||||||
Fielder's Creek | Englewood, CO | 217 | – | 217 | 203 | 93.5% | 96.8% | |||||||
Landings of Brentwood | Brentwood, TN | 724 | 1 | 723 | 698 | 96.4% | 97.4% | |||||||
1250 West Apartments | Marietta, GA | 468 | 1 | 467 | 435 | 92.9% | 93.9% | |||||||
Sixteen50 @ Lake Ray Hubbard | Rockwall, TX | 334 | 1 | 333 | 320 | 95.8% | 96.8% | |||||||
Eleven10 at Farmers Market | Dallas, TX | 313 | 2 | 311 | 290 | 92.7% | 94.1% | |||||||
Patina Flats | Loveland, CO | 155 | – | 155 | 147 | 94.8% | 95.6% | |||||||
Clarion Park Apartments | Olathe, KS | 220 | 1 | 219 | 209 | 95.0% | 96.7% | |||||||
Spring Creek Apartments | Edmond, OK | 252 | 1 | 251 | 237 | 94.0% | 95.8% | |||||||
Montclair Parc Apartment Homes | Oklahoma City, OK | 360 | 1 | 359 | 346 | 96.1% | 97.6% | |||||||
Hilliard Park Apartments | Columbus, OH | 201 | 1 | 200 | 195 | 97.0% | 97.7% | |||||||
Sycamore Terrace Apartments | Terre Haute, IN | 250 | – | 250 | 237 | 94.8% | 95.6% | |||||||
Hilliard Summit Apartments | Columbus, OH | 208 | 1 | 207 | 199 | 95.7% | 97.0% | |||||||
Forty 57 Apartments | Lexington, KY | 436 | 1 | 435 | 414 | 95.0% | 95.6% | |||||||
Riverford Crossing Apartments | Frankfort, KY | 300 | 1 | 299 | 289 | 96.3% | 97.2% | |||||||
Montecito Apartments | Austin, TX | 268 | 2 | 266 | 254 | 94.8% | 96.2% | |||||||
Hilliard Grand Apartments | Dublin, OH | 314 | – | 314 | 299 | 95.2% | 96.6% | |||||||
Deep Deuce at Bricktown | Oklahoma City, OK | 294 | 1 | 293 | 275 | 93.5% | 94.9% | |||||||
Retreat at Quail North | Oklahoma City, OK | 240 | 1 | 239 | 225 | 93.8% | 94.9% | |||||||
Tapestry Park Apartments | Birmingham, AL | 354 | 1 | 353 | 332 | 93.8% | 94.9% | |||||||
Bricegrove Park Apartments | Canal Winchester, OH | 240 | – | 240 | 231 | 96.3% | 96.8% | |||||||
Retreat at Hamburg Place | Lexington, KY | 150 | 1 | 149 | 142 | 94.7% | 95.5% | |||||||
Villas at Huffmeister | Houston, TX | 294 | 1 | 293 | 276 | 93.9% | 95.7% | |||||||
Villas at Kingwood | Kingwood, TX | 330 | 1 | 329 | 312 | 94.5% | 95.5% | |||||||
Waterford Place at Riata Ranch | Cypress, TX | 228 | 1 | 227 | 217 | 95.2% | 96.1% | |||||||
Carrington Place | Houston, TX | 324 | 1 | 323 | 302 | 93.2% | 94.3% |
18
Monthly Portfolio Snapshot | MARCH 2020 - CONTINUED | |||||||||||||
Property | Location | Total Units | Non-Revenue Units | Rentable Units | Average Occupied Units | Average % Occupied | % Leased | |||||||
Multi-Family | ||||||||||||||
Carrington at Champion Forest | Houston, TX | 284 | 1 | 283 | 264 | 93.0% | 94.5% | |||||||
Carrington Park at Huffmeister | Cypress, TX | 232 | 1 | 231 | 217 | 93.5% | 94.4% | |||||||
Heritage Grand at Sienna Plantation | Missouri City, TX | 240 | 1 | 239 | 224 | 93.3% | 94.6% | |||||||
Mallard Crossing Apartments | Loveland, OH | 350 | – | 350 | 330 | 94.3% | 95.5% | |||||||
Reserve at Creekside | Chattanooga, TN | 192 | 1 | 191 | 182 | 94.8% | 95.9% | |||||||
Oak Crossing Apartments | Fort Wayne, IN | 222 | 1 | 221 | 214 | 96.4% | 97.4% | |||||||
Double Creek Flats | Plainfield, IN | 240 | 1 | 239 | 226 | 94.2% | 95.6% | |||||||
Jefferson at the Perimeter | Dunwoody, GA | 504 | – | 504 | 474 | 94.0% | 95.1% | |||||||
Bristol Village | Aurora, CO | 240 | – | 240 | 229 | 95.4% | 96.8% | |||||||
Canyon Resort at Great Hills | Austin, TX | 256 | 1 | 255 | 240 | 93.8% | 94.3% | |||||||
Reflections on Sweetwater | Lawrenceville, GA | 280 | 1 | 279 | 256 | 91.4% | 93.8% | |||||||
The Pointe at Vista Ridge | Lewisville, TX | 300 | 1 | 299 | 288 | 96.0% | 98.1% | |||||||
Belmar Villas | Lakewood, CO | 318 | – | 318 | 299 | 94.0% | 95.2% | |||||||
Ansley at Princeton Lakes | Atlanta, GA | 306 | 1 | 305 | 285 | 93.1% | 95.8% | |||||||
Sugar Mill | Lawrenceville, GA | 244 | 1 | 243 | 222 | 91.0% | 93.2% | |||||||
Avery Point | Indianapolis, IN | 512 | – | 512 | 473 | 92.4% | 94.5% | |||||||
Cottage Trails at Culpepper Landing | Chesapeake, VA | 183 | 1 | 182 | 176 | 96.2% | 97.4% | |||||||
Total | 21,525 | 57 | 21,468 | 20,259 | 94.1% | 95.5% | ||||||||
Commercial Space | ||||||||||||||
Storage | Location | Total Units | Total Storage Units | Occupied Storage Units | % Occupied | |||||||||
Park Valley Commercial | Smyrna, GA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | |||||||||
Retail | Location | Total Units | Total Square Footage | Occupied Square Footage | % Occupied | |||||||||
Patina Flats | Loveland, CO | 7 | 15,026 | 5,221 | 34.7% | |||||||||
19
DEFINITIONS OF PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE METRICS
Total Units: | Number of units per property at the end of the reporting period. |
Non-Revenue Units: | Number of model units or other non-revenue administrative units at the end of the reporting period. |
Rentable Units: | Total Units less Non-Revenue Units at the end of the reporting period. |
Average Occupied Units: | Number of units occupied based on a daily average during the reporting period. |
Average Percent Occupied: | Percent of units occupied (Average Occupied Units divided by Total Units). |
Percent Leased: | Percent of Total Units leased at the end of the reporting period (number of leased units divided by Total Units). |
Total Storage Units: | Total number of storage units at the end of the reporting period. |
Occupied Storage Units: | Total number of storage units occupied at the end of the reporting period. |
Total Square Footage: | Total square footage of commercial property at the end of the reporting period. |
Occupied Square Footage: | Total square footage of commercial property occupied at the end of the reporting period. |
Percent Occupied: | Percent of storage units occupied (Occupied Storage Units divided by Total Storage Units) or square footage occupied (Occupied Square Footage divided by Total Square Footage). |
20