MSB FINANCIAL CORP - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - MSB FINANCIAL CORP	msbf-03312018xex32.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - MSB FINANCIAL CORP	msbf-03312018xex312.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - MSB FINANCIAL CORP	msbf-03312018xex311.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

___________________________________

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended

March 31, 2018

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from

Commission File Number 001-37506

MSB FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

MARYLAND

34-1981437

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

1902 Long Hill Road, Millington, New Jersey

07946-0417

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code

(908) 647-4000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company" and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ]

Accelerated filer [ ]

Non-accelerated filer [ ]

Smaller reporting company [X]

Emerging growth company [ ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act . [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X ]

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: May 11, 2018:

$0.01 par value common stock 5,518,795 shares outstanding

MSB FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX



		Page Number
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1:	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
	at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017	3

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 and 2017	4

	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months
	Ended March 31, 2018 and 2017	6

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	7

Item 2:	Management's Discussion and Analysis of	21
	Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	25

Item 4:	Controls and Procedures	25


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1:	Legal Proceedings	26

Item 1A:	Risk Factors	26

Item 2:	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	26

Item 3:	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	27

Item 4:	Mine Safety Disclosures	27

Item 5:	Other Information	27

Item 6:	Exhibits	28

SIGNATURES		29

CERTIFICATIONS

ITEM 1 – CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

MSB FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(Unaudited)



	March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Cash and due from banks	$	1,871		$	2,030
Interest-earning demand deposits with banks	15,484			20,279

Cash and Cash Equivalents	17,355			22,309

Securities held to maturity (fair value of $35,561 and $38,255, respectively)	36,375			38,482
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $5,506 and $5,414, respectively	480,916			473,405
Premises and equipment, net	8,580			8,698
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost	3,049			2,131
Bank owned life insurance	14,294			14,197
Accrued interest receivable	1,642			1,607
Other assets	1,816			2,211

Total Assets	$	564,027		$	563,040

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	36,751		$	36,919
Interest bearing	397,092			411,994

Total Deposits	433,843			448,913

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank of New York	58,075			37,675
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	772			686
Other liabilities	1,578			2,741

Total Liabilities	494,268			490,015

Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock, par value $0.01; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding	—			—
Common stock, par value $0.01; 49,000,000 shares authorized; 5,524,095 and 5,768,632 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively	55			58
Paid-in capital	46,756			51,068
Retained earnings	24,663			23,641
Unearned common stock held by ESOP (187,666 and 190,390 shares, respectively)	(1,715		)	(1,742		)

Total Stockholders' Equity	69,759			73,025

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	564,027		$	563,040

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

MSB FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)



	Three months ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2018		2017
Interest Income:
Loans receivable, including fees	$	5,136	$	4,000
Securities	219		251
Other	74		42
Total Interest Income	5,429		4,293
Interest Expense
Deposits	846		502
Borrowings	281		196
Total Interest Expense	1,127		698

Net Interest Income	4,302		3,595
Provision for Loan Losses	90		195
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses	4,212		3,400

Non-Interest Income
Fees and service charges	83		71
Income from bank owned life insurance	97		107
Other	24		9
Total Non-Interest Income	204		187

Non-Interest Expenses
Salaries and employee benefits	1,805		1,506
Directors compensation	122		176
Occupancy and equipment	385		394
Service bureau fees	67		48
Advertising	4		3
FDIC assessment	54		33
Professional services	353		359
Other	197		198
Total Non-Interest Expenses	2,987		2,717

Income before Income Taxes	1,429		870
Income Tax Expense	407		321
Net Income	$	1,022	$	549

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.19	$	0.10
Diluted	$	0.19	$	0.10

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

MSB Financial Corp and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)



(Dollars in Thousands)	Common Stock			Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings		Unallocated Common Stock Held by ESOP			Total Stockholders' Equity


Balance- January 1, 2018	$	58		$	51,068		$	23,641	$	(1,742	)	73,025

Net income	—			—			1,022		—			1,022
Allocation of ESOP stock	—			22			—		27			49
Repurchased Stock (244,537 shares)	(3		)	(4,412		)	—		—			(4,415		)
Stock-based compensation	—			78			—		—			78

Balance - March 31, 2018	$	55		$	46,756		$	24,663	$	(1,715	)	$	69,759

MSB FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2018			2017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	1,022		$	549
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net accretion of securities premiums and discounts and deferred loan fees and costs	(5		)	(26		)
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment	145			134
Stock-based compensation and allocation of ESOP stock	127			134
Provision for loan losses	90			195
Income from bank owned life insurance	(97		)	(107		)
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable	(35		)	101
Decrease (increase) in other assets	395			(203		)
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities	(1,163		)	267
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities	479			1,044

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Activity in held to maturity securities:
Maturities, calls and principal repayments	2,074			1,368
Net increase in loans receivable	(4,244		)	(18,737		)
Purchased loans	(3,319		)	(19,102		)
Proceeds from sales of loans	—			7,250
Purchase of bank premises and equipment	(27		)	(95		)
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock	(6,804		)	(2,921		)
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock	5,886			1,728
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities	(6,434		)	(30,509		)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net decrease in deposits	(15,070		)	(7,368		)
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank of New York	30,400			26,500
Repayment of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank of New York	(10,000		)	—
Increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	86			32
Net exercise of options and repurchase of shares	(25		)	—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	—			168
Repurchase of common stock	(4,390		)	—
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	1,001			19,332

Net decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents	(4,954		)	(10,133		)
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Beginning	22,309			21,382
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Ending	$	17,355		$	11,249

Supplementary Cash Flows Information
Interest paid	$	1,151		$	700

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

MSB FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1 – Organization and Business

MSB Financial Corp. (the "Company") is a Maryland-chartered corporation organized in 2014 to be the successor to MSB Financial Corp., a federal corporation ("Old MSB") upon completion of the second-step conversion of Millington Bank (the "Bank") from the two-tier mutual holding company structure to the stock holding company structure. MSB Financial, MHC (the "MHC") was the former mutual holding company for Old MSB prior to completion of the second-step conversion. In conjunction with the second-step conversion, each of the MHC and Old MSB ceased to exist.

The Company's principal business is the ownership and operation of the Bank. The Bank is a New Jersey-chartered stock savings bank and its deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The primary business of the Bank is attracting retail deposits from the general public and using those deposits together with funds generated from operations, principal repayments on securities and loans and borrowed funds, for its lending and investing activities. The Bank's loan portfolio primarily consists of one-to-four family and home equity residential loans, commercial and multi-family real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, and construction loans. It also invests in U.S. government obligations, corporate bonds, state and political subdivisions, certificate of deposits and mortgage-backed securities. The Bank is regulated by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Federal Reserve") regulates the Company as a bank holding company.

The primary business of Millington Savings Service Corp (the "Service Corp"), the Bank's wholly-owned subsidiary, was the ownership and operation of a single commercial rental property. This property was sold during the year ended June 30, 2007. Currently the Service Corp is inactive.

Note 2 – Basis of Consolidated Financial Statement Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank, and the Bank's wholly owned subsidiary the Service Corp. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X, and therefore, do not include all information or notes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP").

In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments or accruals, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been made at March 31, 2018 and for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for an entire fiscal year or other interim periods.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the consolidated statements of financial condition and revenues and expenses for the periods then ended. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-9, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASU 2014-9)", which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-9 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-9 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. The FASB also subsequently issued ASUs Nos. 2016-8, 2016-10, 2016-12, 2016-20 and 2017-5 to augment, amend and clarify the original pronouncement. The Company had evaluated all of its revenue streams and determined that the majority of its revenue is derived from financial instruments that are scoped out. In addition, non-interest revenue streams were evaluated, including deposit and service charges and interchange fees. The adoption of this guidance has not changed the recognition of our current revenue sources.

Note 2 - Basis of Consolidated Financial Statement Presentation (Continued)

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-1, "Financial Instruments - Overall." The guidance in this ASU among other things, (1) requires equity investments with certain exceptions, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, (2) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment, (3) eliminates the requirement for public businesses entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet, (4) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, (5) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the change in fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments, (6) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements and (7) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities. The guidance in this ASU was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2018, did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-2, "Leases" (Topic 842). This ASU revises the accounting related to lessee accounting. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases. The new lease guidance also simplified the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily due to the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities. ASU 2016-2 is effective for the first interim period within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The standard is required to be adopted using the modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. We currently expect that upon adoption of ASU 2016-2, right-of-use assets and lease liabilities will be recognized in our consolidated statements of condition in amounts that will be material; however, we do not expect a material impact to our consolidated income statement.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, "Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments." This ASU requires credit losses on most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments to be measured using an expected credit loss model. Under this model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument. The standard is effective for public companies in annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in the interim or annual period provided that the entire standard is adopted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements. We have taken steps to begin preparations for implementation, such as evaluating changes to our current loss recognition model and evaluating the potential use of outside professionals for an updated model.

Note 3 – Earnings Per Share

The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)	2018		2017
Numerator:
Net income	$	1,022	$	549

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares	5,470		5,520
Dilutive potential common shares	37		94
Weighted average fully diluted shares	5,507		5,614

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.19	$	0.10
Dilutive	$	0.19	$	0.10

For three months ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017, there were no anti-dilutive securities.

Note 4 - Securities Held to Maturity - Continued

Note 4 - Securities Held to Maturity

All mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 have been issued by FNMA, FHLMC or GNMA and are secured by one-to-four family residential real estate. The amortized cost and fair value of securities held to maturity at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, as shown below, are reported in total. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

The amortized cost of securities held to maturity and their fair values as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are summarized as follows:



(In Thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrecognized Gains		Gross Unrecognized Losses		Fair Value
March 31, 2018
U.S. Government agencies:
Due within one year	$	2,500	$	—	$	15	$	2,485
Due after one year through five years	2,000		—		30		1,970

Total U.S. Government agencies	4,500		—		45		4,455


Mortgage-backed securities	23,228		142		437		22,933

Corporate bonds:
Due within one year	508		—		1		507
Due after one year through five years	1,500		6		—		1,506
Due after five through ten years	1,000		—		56		944
Due after ten years	4,000		—		410		3,590
Total Corporate bonds	7,008		6		467		6,547

State and political subdivisions:
Due within one year	151		—		1		150
Due after one through five years	679		1		7		673
Due after five through ten years	364		—		6		358
Total State and political subdivisions	1,194		1		14		1,181

Certificates of deposit:
Due within one year	445		1		1		445
Total Certificates of deposit	445		1		1		445

Total Securities held to maturity	$	36,375	$	150	$	964	$	35,561

Note 4 - Securities Held to Maturity - Continued



(In Thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrecognized Gains		Gross Unrecognized Losses		Fair Value
December 31, 2017
U.S. Government agencies:
Due within one year	$	3,500	$	—	$	16	$	3,484
Due after one year through five years	2,000		—		26		1,974
Total U.S. Government Agencies	5,500		—		42		5,458

Mortgage-backed securities	23,839		263		207		23,895

Corporate bonds:
Due within one year	512		3		—		515
Due after one year through five years	1,500		4		—		1,504
Due after five years through ten years	1,000		—		35		965
Due thereafter	4,000		—		209		3,791
Total Corporate bonds	7,012		7		244		6,775

State and political subdivisions:
Due within one year	151		—		1		150
Due after one through five years	680		1		4		677
Due after five through ten years	365		—		—		365
Total State and political subdivisions	1,196		1		5		1,192

Certificates of deposit:
Due within one year	935		1		1		935
Total Certificates of deposit	935		1		1		935

Total Securities held to maturity	$	38,482	$	272	$	499	$	38,255

There were no sales of securities held to maturity during the three months ended March 31, 2018 or 2017. At March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, securities held to maturity with an amortized cost and fair value of approximately $2.0 million and $1.0 million, respectfully, were pledged to secure public funds on deposit.

The following tables set forth the gross unrecognized losses and fair value of securities in an unrecognized loss position as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and the length of time that such securities have been in an unrecognized loss position.



	Less than 12 Months				More than 12 Months				Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrecognized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrecognized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrecognized Losses
(In Thousands)
March 31, 2018
U.S. Government agencies	$	—	$	—	$	4,455	$	45	$	4,455	$	45
Mortgage-backed securities	10,954		244		5,257		193		16,211		437
Corporate bonds	507		1		4,534		466		5,041		467
State and political subdivisions	1,181		14		—		—		1,181		14
Certificates of deposit	245		1		—		—		245		1

Total securities with gross unrecognized losses	$	12,887	$	260	$	14,246	$	704	$	27,133	$	964

Note 4 - Securities Held to Maturity - Continued



	Less than 12 Months				More than 12 Months				Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrecognized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrecognized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrecognized Losses
(In Thousands)
December 31, 2017
U.S. Government agencies	$	1,000	$	1	$	4,458	$	41	$	5,458	$	42
Mortgage-backed securities	7,796		88		5,558		119		13,354		207
Corporate bonds	—		—		4,756		244		4,756		244
State and political subdivisions	655		5		—		—		655		5
Certificates of deposit	245		1		—		—		245		1

Total securities with gross unrecognized losses	$	9,696	$	95	$	14,772	$	404	$	24,468	$	499

At March 31, 2018, management concluded that the unrecognized losses summarized above (which related to four U.S. Government agency bonds, twenty mortgage-backed securities, four corporate bonds, seven state and political subdivision security and one certificate of deposit, compared to five U.S. Government agency bonds, sixteen mortgage-backed securities, three corporate bonds, four state and political subdivision bonds, and one certificate of deposit as of December 31, 2017) are temporary in nature since they are not related to the underlying credit quality of the issuer. As of March 31, 2018, the Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company would be required to sell these securities prior to the anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost. Management believes that the losses above are primarily related to the change in market interest rates. Accordingly, the Company has not recognized any other-than-temporary impairment loss on these securities.

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses

The composition of loans receivable at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was as follows:



(In Thousands)	March 31, 2018		December 31, 2017
Residential mortgage:
One-to-four family	$	154,576	$	157,876
Home equity	27,051		26,803

Total residential mortgages	181,627		184,679

Commercial loans:
Commercial and multi-family real estate	195,951		196,681
Construction	49,397		43,718
Commercial and industrial	82,712		73,465

Total commercial loans	328,060		313,864

Consumer:	595		618

Total loans receivable	510,282		499,161

Less:
Loans in process	23,398		19,868
Deferred loan fees	462		474
Allowance for loan losses	5,506		5,414

Total adjustments	29,366		25,756

Loans receivable, net	$	480,916	$	473,405

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

Allowance for Loan Losses

The following tables provide an analysis of the allowance for loan losses and the loan receivable recorded investments, by portfolio segment, segregated into the amount required for loans individually evaluated for impairment and the amount required for loans collectively evaluated for impairment as of March 31, 2018 and 2017 and loans individually evaluated for impairment and the amount required for loans collectively evaluated for impairment as of December 31, 2017:



(In Thousands)	Residential Mortgage		Commercial and Multi-Family Real Estate		Construction		Commercial and Industrial		Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018

Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning	$	1,852	$	2,267	$	302	$	710	$	5		$	278		$	5,414
Provisions (credits)	141		7		19		64		—			(141		)	$	90
Loans charged-off	—		—		—		—		(2		)	—			$	(2	)
Recoveries	4		—		—		—		—			—			$	4
Balance, ending	$	1,997	$	2,274	$	321	$	774	$	3		$	137		$	5,506

Period-end allowance allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	35	$	—	$	—	$	26	$	—		$	—		$	61
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	1,962		2,274		321		748		3			137			$	5,445
Ending Balance	$	1,997	$	2,274	$	321	$	774	$	3		$	137		$	5,506

Period-end loan balances evaluated for:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	11,430	$	2,038	$	—	$	196	$	—		$	—		$	13,664
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	170,117		193,675		25,942		82,429		595			—			$	472,758
Ending Balance	$	181,547	$	195,713	$	25,942	$	82,625	$	595		$	—		$	486,422

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)



(In Thousands)	Residential Mortgage			Commercial and Multi-Family Real Estate			Construction		Commercial and Industrial			Consumer			Unallocated			Total

Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

Allowance for loan losses:
Balance, beginning	$	1,808		$	1,441		$	248	$	882		$	6		$	91		$	4,476
Provisions (credits)	(23		)	28			91		141			2			(44		)	$	195
Loans charged-off	(2		)	(43		)	—		(1		)	(1		)	—			$	(47	)
Recoveries	2			—			—		—			—			—			$	2
Balance, ending	$	1,785		$	1,426		$	339	$	1,022		$	7		$	47		$	4,626

Period-end allowance allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	100		$	—		$	—	$	92		$	—		$	—		$	192
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	1,685			1,426			339		930			7			47			$	4,434
Ending Balance	$	1,785		$	1,426		$	339	$	1,022		$	7		$	47		$	4,626

Period-end loan balances evaluated for:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	14,427		$	1,510		$	—	$	371		$	—		$	—		$	16,308
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	176,065			139,390			16,493		54,422			395			—			$	386,765
Ending Balance	$	190,492		$	140,900		$	16,493	$	54,793		$	395		$	—		$	403,073



(In Thousands)	Residential Mortgage		Commercial and Multi-Family Real Estate		Construction		Commercial and Industrial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
At December 31, 2017

Period-end allowance balances:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	27	$	1	$	—	$	28
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	1,852		2,267		302		683		4		278		$	5,386
Ending Balance	$	1,852	$	2,267	$	302	$	710	$	5	$	278	$	5,414

Period-end loan balances evaluated for:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	12,609	$	2,057	$	—	$	205	$	1	$	—	$	14,872
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	171,988		194,373		23,803		73,167		616		—		$	463,947
Ending Balance	$	184,597	$	196,430	$	23,803	$	73,372	$	617	$	—	$	478,819

Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans

The following table represents the recorded investments in classes of the loans receivable portfolio summarized by aging categories of performing loans and nonaccrual loans as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)



(In Thousands)
As of March 31, 2018	30-59 Days Past Due and Still Accruing		60-89 Days Past Due and Still Accruing		Greater than 90 Days and Still Accruing		Total Past Due and Still Accruing		Accruing Current Balances		Nonaccrual Loans		Total Loans Receivables

Residential Mortgage
One-to-four family	$	1,470	$	820	$	187	$	2,477	$	148,906	$	3,112	$	154,495
Home equity	1,352		573		45		1,970		25,038		44		27,052
Commercial and multi-family real estate	—		380		1,034		1,414		194,003		296		195,713
Construction	—		—		—		—		25,942		—		25,942
Commercial and industrial	337		—		—		337		82,192		96		82,625
Consumer	10		—		—		10		585		—		595
Total	$	3,169	$	1,773	$	1,266	$	6,208	$	476,666	$	3,548	$	486,422



(In Thousands)
As of December 31, 2017	30-59 Days Past Due and Still Accruing		60-89 Days Past Due and Still Accruing		Greater than 90 Days and Still Accruing		Total Past Due and Still Accruing		Accruing Current Balances		Nonaccrual Loans		Total Loans Receivables

Residential Mortgage
One-to-four family	$	1,221	$	700	$	—	$	1,921	$	152,425	$	3,446	$	157,792
Home equity	605		16		157		778		25,912		115		26,805
Commercial and multi-family real estate	—		—		—		—		196,115		315		196,430
Construction	—		—		—		—		23,803		—		23,803
Commercial and industrial	68		—		—		68		73,205		99		73,372
Consumer	—		5		1		6		611		—		617
Total	$	1,894	$	721	$	158	$	2,773	$	472,071	$	3,975	$	478,819

Impaired Loans

The following tables provide an analysis of the impaired loans at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 and the average balances of such loans for the three months and year, respectively, then ended:

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)



(In Thousands)
March 31, 2018	Recorded Investment		Loans with No Related Reserve		Loans with Related Reserve		Related Reserve		Contractual Principal Balance		Average Recorded Investment

Residential mortgage
One-to-four family	$	10,191	$	9,852	$	341	$	35	$	10,760	$	10,686
Home equity	1,239		1,239		—		—		1,328		1,333

Commercial and multi-family real estate	2,038		2,038		—		—		2,672		2,048
Construction	—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial	196		165		31		26		236		200
Consumer	—		—		—		—		—		1
Total	$	13,664	$	13,294	$	372	$	61	$	14,996	$	14,268



(In Thousands)
December 31, 2017	Recorded Investment		Loans with No Related Reserve		Loans with Related Reserve		Related Reserve		Contractual Principal Balance		Average Recorded Investment

Residential mortgage
One-to-four family	$	11,181	$	11,181	$	—	$	—	$	11,729	$	12,256
Home equity	1,428		1,428		—		—		1,522		1,335

Commercial and multi-family real estate	2,057		2,057		—		—		2,680		1,787
Construction	—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial	205		173		32		27		242		296
Consumer	1		—		1		1		1		1
Total	$	14,872	$	14,839	$	33	$	28	$	16,174	$	15,675

As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, impaired loans listed above include $11.6 million and $11.4 million, respectively, of loans modified in troubled debt restructurings ("TDR") and as such are considered impaired under GAAP. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, $9.7 million and $9.7 million, respectively, of these loans have been performing in accordance with their modified terms for an extended period of time and as such were removed from non-accrual status and considered performing.

Interest income of $116,000 and $105,000 was recognized on impaired loans during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017. The average balance of impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017 were $14.3 million and $16.1 million, respectively.

Credit Quality Indicators

Management uses a nine point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the loans in the Company's commercial real estate, construction and commercial and industrial loan segments. The borrower's overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually or when credit deficiencies, such as delinquent loan payments, arise. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions.

The Bank's rating categories are as follows:

1 – 5: The first five risk rating categories are considered not criticized, and are aggregated as "Pass" rated.

6: "Special Mention" category includes assets that are currently protected, but are potentially weak, resulting in increased credit risk and deserving management's close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects.

7: "Substandard" loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. This includes loans that are

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.

8: "Doubtful" loans have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified "Substandard" with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable.

9: "Loss" loans are considered uncollectible and subsequently charged off.

The following table presents the recorded investment in classes of the loans receivable portfolio summarized by the aggregate "Pass" and the criticized categories of "Special Mention", "Substandard", "Doubtful" and "Loss" within the internal risk rating system as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:



(In Thousands)
As of March 31, 2018	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total

Commercial and multi-family real estate	$	192,595	$	2,098	$	1,020	$	—	$	—	$	195,713
Construction	25,942		—		—		—		—		25,942
Commercial and industrial	81,982		422		221		—		—		82,625

Total	$	300,519	$	2,520	$	1,241	$	—	$	—	$	304,280



(In Thousands)
As of December 31, 2017	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total

Commercial and multi-family real estate	$	193,982	$	1,415	$	1,033	$	—	$	—	$	196,430
Construction	23,803		—		—		—		—		23,803
Commercial and industrial	72,962		182		228		—		—		73,372

Total	$	290,747	$	1,597	$	1,261	$	—	$	—	$	293,605

Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the residential portfolio by analyzing the age of the portfolio as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. These credit quality indicators are assessed in the aggregate in these relatively homogeneous portfolios. Loans greater than 90 days past due are generally considered nonperforming and placed on nonaccrual status.



(In Thousands)	Residential mortgage				Consumer				Total Residential and Consumer
	Mar 31, 2018		Dec 31, 2017		Mar 31, 2018		Dec 31, 2017		Mar 31, 2018		Dec 31, 2017

Nonperforming	$	3,201	$	3,718	$	—	$	1	$	3,201	$	3,719

Performing	178,346		180,879		595		616		178,941		181,495

Total	$	181,547	$	184,597	$	595	$	617	$	182,142	$	185,214

Troubled Debt Restructurings

Loans, the terms of which are modified, are classified as a TDR if, in connection with the modification, the Company grants such borrowers concessions and it is deemed that those borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. Concessions granted under a TDR generally involve a reduction in the loan's interest rate below market rates given the associated credit risk, or an extension of a loan's stated maturity date or capitalization of interest and/or escrow. Nonaccrual TDRs are restored to accrual status if principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are current for six consecutive months after modification. Loans classified as TDRs are designated as impaired until they are ultimately repaid in full or foreclosed and sold. The nature and extent of impairment of TDRs, including those which experienced a subsequent default, is considered in the determination of an appropriate level of allowance for loan losses.

Note 5 - Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

The recorded investment balance of TDRs totaled $11.6 million at March 31, 2018 compared with $11.4 million at December 31, 2017. The majority of the Company's TDRs are on accrual status. Accruing TDRs totaled $9.7 million at March 31, 2018 versus $9.7 million at December 31, 2017. The total of TDRs on non-accrual status was $1.9 million at March 31, 2018 and $1.7 million at December 31, 2017.

For the three months ended March 31, 2018, the terms of one loan was modified into one TDR. The Company refinanced a multi-family & commercial loan that was restructured to extend the maturity date and capitalize the interest. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the terms of seven loans were modified into three TDRs. The Company refinanced and consolidated a one-to-four family and one home-equity mortgage that was restructured to an adjustable interest rate from a fixed interest rate. In addition, the Company restructured a one-to-four family loan, a home equity loan and a commercial line of credit. These loans were consolidated into one one-to-four family TDR with an extended maturity date. The Company restructured two commercial and multi-family real estate loans into one TDR and extended the maturity date.

The following tables summarize by the recorded investment class loans modified into TDRs during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017:



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investments		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investments
		(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial and multi-family real estate	1	374		392


Total	1	$	374	$	392



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investments		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investments
		(Dollars in thousands)

Residential Mortgage
One-to-four family	2	$	575	$	878
Home equity	2	99		—
Commercial and multi-family real estate	2	419		398
Commercial	1	130		—

Total	7	$	1,223	$	1,276

A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 90 days contractually past due under the modified terms. There were no loans modified in TDRs during the previous 12 months and for which there was a subsequent payment default for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

There was no Other Real Estate Owned ("OREO") at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. We may obtain physical possession of residential real estate collateralizing consumer mortgage loans via foreclosure or in-substance repossession. At March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had consumer loans with a carrying value of $384,000 and $1.2 million, respectively, collateralized by residential real estate property for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process.

Note 6 - Fair Value Measurements

Note 6 - Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and certain liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures.

FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Market Value Disclosures ("ASC 820"), defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

ASC 820 requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost). Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.

The fair value hierarchy is as follows:


•	Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

•

Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.


•	Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. An asset's or liability's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The Company's valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future values. While management believes the Company's valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The Bank did not have any financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

Note 6 - Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Certain financial and non-financial assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).

The following table summarizes those assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:



	As of March 31, 2018
	Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	311	$	311



	As of December 31, 2017
	Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	6	$	6

For Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the significant unobservable inputs used in fair value measurements were as follows:



	As of March 31, 2018
	Fair Value		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans	$	311	Appraisal of collateral	Appraisal adjustments	0% to 458.9% (6.72%)
				Liquidation expense	0% to 19.0 (18.7%)



	As of December 31, 2017
	Fair Value		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired loans	$	6	Appraisal of collateral	Appraisal adjustments	475.6% (475.6%)
				Liquidation expense	0% (0%)

A loan is measured for impairment at the time the loan is identified as impaired. Loans are considered impaired when based on current information and events it is probable that payments of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Company's impaired loans are generally collateral dependent and, as such, are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Fair values are estimated through current appraisals and adjusted as necessary to reflect current market conditions and as such are classified as Level 3.

Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amount and fair value (represents exit price) of financial instruments, at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are as follows:

Note 6 - Fair Value Measurements (Continued)



	Carrying		Fair		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
As of March 31, 2018	Amount		Value		Inputs		Inputs		Inputs
			(In thousands)

Financial assets:
Securities held to maturity	$	36,375	$	35,561	$	—	$	35,561	$	—
Loans receivable	480,916		470,278		—		—		470,278

Financial liabilities:
Certificate of deposits	151,233		152,534		—		152,534		—
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank of New York	58,075		57,459		—		57,459		—

As of December 31, 2017

Financial assets:
Securities held to maturity	$	38,482	$	38,255	$	—	$	38,255	$	—
Loans receivable	473,405		472,881		—		—		472,881

Financial liabilities:
Certificate of deposits	124,339		125,998		—		125,998		—
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank of New York	37,675		37,400		—		37,400		—

ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of words such as "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "estimates" or similar expressions. Forward – looking statements include:


•	Statements of our goals, intentions and expectations;


•	Statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;


•	Statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and


•	Estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.

These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to, among others, the following factors:


•	General economic conditions, either nationally or in our market area, that are worse than expected;


•	The volatility of the financial and securities markets, including changes with respect to the market value of our financial assets;


•	Changes in government regulation affecting financial institutions and the potential expenses associated therewith;


•	Changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our interest margins or reduce the fair value of financial instruments;


•	Our ability to enter into new markets and/or expand product offerings successfully and take advantage of growth opportunities;


•	Increased competitive pressures among financial services companies;


•	Changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;


•	Legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business;


•	Adverse changes in the securities markets;


•	Our ability to successfully manage our growth; and


•	Changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed and we specifically disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statement.

Critical Accounting Policies

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the consolidated statements of financial position and revenues and expenses for the periods then ended. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. A material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant change relates to the determination of the allowance for loan losses.

The allowance for loan losses represents our best estimate of losses known and inherent in our loan portfolio that are both probable and reasonable to estimate. In determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, we consider the losses inherent in our loan portfolio and changes in the nature and volume of our loan activities, along with general economic and real estate market conditions. We utilize a two-tier approach: (1) identification of impaired loans for which specific reserves may be established; and (2) establishment of general valuation allowances on the remainder of the loan portfolio. We maintain a loan review system which provides for a systematic review of the loan portfolio and the early identification of potential impaired loans. Such system takes into consideration, among other things, delinquency status, size of loan, type of collateral and the financial condition of the borrower. Specific loan loss allowances are established for identified loans based on a review of such information and/or appraisals of the underlying collateral. General loan loss allowances are based upon a combination of factors including, but not limited to, actual loan loss experience, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and management's judgment.

In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank's allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examinations.

Although specific and general loan loss allowances are established in accordance with management's best estimate, actual losses are dependent upon future events and, as such, further provisions for loan losses may be necessary in order to increase the level of the allowance for loan losses. For example, our evaluation of the allowance includes consideration of current economic conditions, and a change in economic conditions could reduce the ability of our borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans. This could result in increased delinquencies and increased non-performing loans, and thus a need to make increased provisions to the allowance for loan losses, which would be a charge to income during the period the provision is made, resulting in a reduction to our earnings. A change in economic conditions could also adversely affect the value of the properties collateralizing our real estate loans, resulting in increased charge-offs against the allowance and reduced recoveries, and thus a need to make increased provisions to the allowance for loan losses. Furthermore, a change in the composition of our loan portfolio or growth of our loan portfolio could result in the need for additional provisions.

Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017

General. Total assets were $564.0 million at March 31, 2018, compared to $563.0 million at December 31, 2017, an increase of $1.0 million or 0.2%. During the period, the Company experienced growth of $7.5 million, or 1.6%, in loans receivable, net. Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLBNY") stock increased $918,000, or 43.1%, due to an increase in borrowings during the period. The Company increased its FHLBNY overnight borrowings by $20.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018. Offsetting these increases were a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $5.0 million, or 22.2%, and a decrease in securities, held to maturity of $2.1 million, or 5.5%, from December 31, 2017 to March 31, 2018.

The ratio of average interest-earning assets to average-interest bearing liabilities was 119.8% for the three month period ended March 31, 2018.

Loans. Loans receivable, net, increased by $7.5 million, or 1.6%, from $473.4 million at December 31, 2017 to $480.9 million at March 31, 2018. Loans receivable, net represented 85.3% of the Company's assets at March 31, 2018 compared to 84.1% at December 31, 2017. The Bank's commercial and industrial portfolio increased by $9.2 million on stronger loan demand, while the construction loan portfolio increased approximately $5.7 million as a result of borrowers utilizing funds to complete projects. The residential mortgage portfolio decreased $3.1 million to $181.6 million from $184.7 million as of year-end 2017. All remaining portfolios were consistent with year-end levels.

Securities. Our portfolio of securities held to maturity totaled $36.4 million at March 31, 2018 as compared to $38.5 million at December 31, 2017. Maturities, calls and principal repayments during the three months ended March 31, 2018 totaled $2.1 million and no purchases were made during the first three months of 2018.

Deposits. Total deposits at March 31, 2018 were $433.8 million compared with $448.9 million at December 31, 2017. Overall, deposits decreased by $15.1 million, or 3.4%, with declines occurring occurring across all product types except savings. The declines were a result of a few large depositors utilizing funds from their accounts. Money market and interest demand balances declined $7.1 million and $6.3 million, respectively. Money market balances declined to $20.3 million compared to $27.4 million at December 31, 2017 while interest demand balances declined to $148.9 million compared to $155.2 million at December 31, 2017. In addition, certificate of deposit (including IRA) balances declined $5.6 million to $118.7 million compared to $124.3 million from year-end. Savings balances increased $4.1 million to $109.2 million from $105.1 million at the prior year end.

Borrowings. Total borrowings at March 31, 2018 were $58.1 million compared with $37.7 million at December 31, 2017. Overnight advances with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York at March 31, 2018 were $20.4 million while there were none at December 31, 2017.

Equity. Stockholders' equity was $69.8 million at March 31, 2018 compared to $73.0 million at December 31, 2017, a decrease of $3.2 million, or 4.5%. The decrease in shareholders' equity was primarily due to the repurchase of stock of $4.4 million, partially offset by $1.0 million in net income.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 and 2017

General. The Company had net income of $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to net income of $549,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017, as an increase of $707,000 in net interest income and a decrease of $105,000 in the provision for loan losses, was partially offset by an increase of $270,000 in non-interest expense and $86,000 in income tax expense. The decrease in the provision expense was related to lower loan growth the Company experienced during the period. The increase in non-interest expense was due to merit and infrastructure increases during the period.

Net Interest Income.

The following tables provide information concerning the balances, yields and rates on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities during the periods indicated:



	For the three months ended
	3/31/2018							3/31/2017
Average Balance Sheet (In Thousands)	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Yield		Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Yield
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable	$	483,255		$	5,136	4.25	%	$	382,386		$	4,000	4.18	%
Securities held to maturity	37,661			219		2.33	%	43,285			251		2.32	%
Other interest-earning assets	10,505			74		2.82	%	11,335			42		1.48	%
Total interest-earning assets	531,421			5,429		4.09	%	437,006			4,293		3.93	%

Allowance for loan loss	(5,461		)					(4,524		)
Non-interest-earning assets	28,346							28,367
Total non-interest-earning assets	22,885							23,843
Total Assets	$	554,306						$	460,849

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand & money market	$	163,667		$	297	0.73	%	$	106,037		$	95	0.36	%
Savings and club deposits	106,495			101		0.38	%	103,774			58		0.22	%
Certificates of deposit	120,360			448		1.49	%	106,513			349		1.31	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	390,522			846		0.87	%	316,324			502		0.63	%

Federal Home Loan Bank advances	53,191			281		2.11	%	29,992			196		2.61	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	443,713			1,127		1.02	%	346,316			698		0.81	%

Non-interest-bearing deposit	36,211							37,821
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities	1,972							2,789
Total Liabilities	481,896							386,926

Equity	72,410							73,923
Total Liabilities and Equity	554,306							460,849

Net Interest Spread				4,302		3.07	%				3,595		3.12	%

Net Interest Margin						3.24	%						3.29	%

Ratio of Interest Earning Assets to Interest Bearing Liabilities	119.77		%					126.19		%

The Company's net interest margin decreased 5 basis points to 3.24% for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 compared to 3.29% for the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The yield on interest-earning assets increased by 16 basis points year over year while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 21 basis points. The increase in the yield on interest-earning assets was attributable to the increase in commercial loan volume during the quarter. Commercial loans generally carry a higher rate than residential loans. The increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities was attributable to the increase in average demand and money market balances and higher rates in the deposit portfolio year over year.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses decreased by $105,000 to $90,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to a provision of $195,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The decreased provision level during the current year period is attributable to slower loan growth during the quarter ended March 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. The Company's management reviews the level of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis based on a variety of factors including, but not limited to, (1) the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, (2) current economic conditions, (3) actual losses previously experienced, (4) the Company's level of loan growth and (5) the existing level of reserves for loan losses that are probable and estimable. The Company had $3.6 million in nonperforming loans as of March 31, 2018 compared to $7.4 million as of March 31, 2017. The allowance for loan losses to total loans ratio was 1.13% at March 31, 2018 compared to 1.15% at March 31, 2017, while the allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans ratio was 153.24% at March 31, 2018 compared to 62.19% at March 31, 2017. Non-performing loans to total loans and net charge-offs to average loans outstanding ratios were at 0.74% and 0.00%, respectively.

Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income increased $17,000, or 9.1%, to $204,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $187,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Non-Interest Expenses. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, non-interest expenses increased $270,000 to $3.0 million from $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Salaries and employee benefits increased by $299,000, or 19.9%, due to merit and infrastructure increases during the period. FDIC assessment expense increased $21,000, or 63.6%, primarily due to an increase in deposits year over year. Service bureau fees increased $19,000, or 39.6%, primarily due the reduction of relationship credits utilized during the period. Partially offsetting these increases were a decrease in directors' compensation of $54,000, or 30.7%, primarily due to the termination of the directors' retirement plan.

Income Taxes. The income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was $407,000 or 28.5% of the reported income before income taxes compared to a tax expense of $321,000 or 36.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2017. As a result of the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on December 22, 2017, the federal tax rate for corporations was reduced to 21% during 2018. The increase in tax provision is attributable to an increase in pre-tax income offset by a decrease in the effective tax rate.

Liquidity, Commitments and Capital Resources

The Bank must be capable of meeting its customer obligations at all times. Potential liquidity demands include funding loan commitments, cash withdrawals from deposit accounts and other funding needs as they present themselves. Accordingly, liquidity is measured by our ability to have sufficient cash reserves on hand, at a reasonable cost and/or with minimum losses.

Senior management is responsible for managing our overall liquidity position and risk and is responsible for ensuring that our liquidity needs are being met on both a daily and long term basis. The Financial Review Committee, comprised of senior management and chaired by the President and Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for establishing and reviewing our liquidity procedures, guidelines, and strategy on a periodic basis.

Our approach to managing day-to-day liquidity is measured through our daily calculation of investable funds and/or borrowing needs to ensure adequate liquidity. In addition, senior management constantly evaluates our short-term and long-term liquidity risk and strategy based on current market conditions, outside investment and/or borrowing opportunities, short and long-term economic trends, and anticipated short and long-term liquidity requirements. The Bank's loan and deposit rates may be adjusted as another means of managing short and long-term liquidity needs. We do not at present participate in derivatives or other types of hedging instruments to meet liquidity demands, as we take a conservative approach in managing liquidity.

At March 31, 2018, the Bank had outstanding commitments to originate loans of $24.0 million, construction loans in process of $23.4 million, unused lines of credit of $70.3 million (including $55.5 million for commercial lines of credit and $14.4 million for home equity lines of credit), and standby letters of credit of $359,000. Certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in one year or less at March 31, 2018, totaled $37.1 million.

As of March 31, 2018, the Bank had contractual obligations related to the long-term operating leases for the three branch locations that it leases (Loan Production Office, RiverWalk and Martinsville).

The Bank generates cash through deposits and/or borrowings from the FHLBNY to meet its day-to-day funding obligations when required. At March 31, 2018, the total loans receivable to deposits ratio was 110.9%. At March 31, 2018, the Bank's collateralized borrowing limit with the FHLBNY was $113.7 million, of which $58.1 million was outstanding. As of March 31, 2018, the Bank also had a $13.0 million unsecured line of credit with one financial institution that it could access if necessary.

Consistent with its goals to operate a sound and profitable financial organization, the Bank actively seeks to maintain its status as a well-capitalized institution in accordance with regulatory standards. As of March 31, 2018, the Company and the Bank exceeded all applicable regulatory capital requirements.

ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

This item is not applicable to the Company as it is a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

An evaluation was performed under the supervision, and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule l3a-l5(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of March 31, 2018. Based on such evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2018.

No change in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule l3a-l5(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There were no material pending legal proceedings at March 31, 2018 to which the Company or its subsidiaries is a party other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their respective businesses.

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

This item is not applicable to the Company as it is a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 2 – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On August 4, 2016, the Registrant announced that it has approved a stock repurchased to purchase up to 595,342 shares of the Registrant’s common stock. In connection with the repurchase plan, the Registrant entered into a Rule 10b5-1 plan with Keefe. Bruyette & Wood, Inc. The following table shows shares repurchased during the quarter ended March 31, 2018.



Period	(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)	(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
January 1-January 31, 2018	—	—	—	—
February 1-February 28, 2018	81,900	$17.81	324,279	271,063
March 1-March 31, 2018	162,637	$17.97	486,916	108,426
Total	244,537	$17.92	486,916	108,426

ITEM 3 – DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable

ITEM 5 – OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6 – EXHIBITS



31.1	Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		MSB FINANCIAL CORP.
		(Registrant)


Date May 11, 2018		/s/ Michael A. Shriner
		Michael A. Shriner
		President and Chief Executive Officer


Date May 11, 2018		/s/ John S. Kaufman
		John S. Kaufman
		First Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

MSB FINANCIAL CORP - FORM 10-Q - May 11, 2018

Attached files

MSB FINANCIAL CORP Reports