Attached files

file filename
8-K - 8-K - Urban Edge Propertiesa8-kchairmansannualletter.htm


Exhibit 99.1

uelogoa17.jpg

To Our Shareholders,

Investors will remember 2017 as the year brick-and-mortar retailers experienced an existential crisis. Amazon and other e-commerce providers are disrupting the industry, creating chaos throughout much of the sector and pressuring retailers and landlords to evolve. The market is separating the winners from the losers. Urban Edge is a winner because our high quality real estate consistently attracts the best tenants, our growth is primarily derived from investing in our existing assets and our strong balance sheet provides ample capital for funding redevelopment and acquisitions.

First, our concentration in metro New York, the nation’s most densely-populated market, is a powerful draw for retailers. Our top tenants include many of today’s most successful retailers including Home Depot, Walmart, Costco, TJX, ShopRite and Whole Foods (now owned by Amazon). Our shopping centers generate strong sales with grocers producing nearly $800 per square foot - the highest reported number in the sector. The desirability of our centers is evidenced by our 98% same property occupancy rate.

Second, improving our existing shopping centers is our most significant growth opportunity. We are executing a $300 million program to renovate and remerchandise our properties and adding retailers like ShopRite, Sprouts, Marshalls, Homesense, Burlington, Ulta, Five Below, Starbucks and Chick-fil-A. We expect to earn an attractive 8%+ unlevered return while increasing traffic, sales and rents.

Many of our properties are ripe for redevelopment due to their irreplaceable locations, age, physical condition, anchor lease maturities, below-market rents and retail demand. A prime example is Bruckner Commons where ShopRite is opening its first store in the Bronx and where Burlington is adding a new two-story location. Bruckner is being transformed from an unattractive, dated center into an appealing shopping destination with an exciting mix of food, apparel and services that will cater to the 700,000 people living within three miles.

Lastly, our balance sheet is one of the strongest in the shopping center sector. During 2017, we raised approximately $500 million in equity at $26 per share and closed $1.0 billion of non-recourse mortgages at a blended 4% interest rate with a weighted average term-to-maturity of ten years. As of December 31, 2017, our net debt to total market capitalization ratio was only 22% and our net debt to adjusted EBITDA was 4.6x. We have approximately $500 million of cash, $1.4 billion of unencumbered properties, no corporate debt, no crossed mortgages and no debt maturing until 2021. We are well positioned to fund our redevelopment and acquisition initiatives.











We are pleased with our report card since we spun from Vornado three years ago.
 
2015
2016
2017
Return
since spin
Stock performance incl. dividends
 
 
 
 
   Urban Edge
2%
21%
-4%
19%
   Bloomberg Shopping Center Index
-3%
-4%
-11%
-12%
   Outperformance
500bp
2,500bp
700bp
3,100bp
 
 
 
 
 
FFO as Adjusted per share
$1.21
$1.27
$1.34
 
FFO as Adjusted growth
    n/a
5.0%
5.5%
 
Same property cash NOI growth
4.1%
4.1%
4.7%
 
Same property occupancy rate
97.2%
98.0%
98.3%
 

Two areas of focus in 2018 are retailer bankruptcies and Puerto Rico.

Retailer bankruptcies will continue to impact the sector. Our top tenants, however, are generally winners in the evolving retail environment. We view bankruptcies as an opportunity to upgrade our properties as highlighted by Toys R Us. We have nine spaces leased to Toys representing $6 million in revenue or $.05 per share. We look forward to replacing Toys with more popular and successful tenants, many of which are already pursuing these spaces.

Our two assets in Puerto Rico are performing well since re-opening just eight weeks after Hurricane Maria. Even in a deeply-troubled economy, our properties are 93% leased and generating double-digit sales increases over last year. Maintaining occupancy and improving merchandising are important objectives for 2018. Non-recourse mortgages limit our economic exposure.

Our success is tied to the leaders who execute our strategy. We are fortunate to have an experienced team led by Bob Minutoli, Mark Langer, Michael Zucker, Herb Eilberg, Bernie Schachter, Rob Milton and Jennifer Holmes. I am proud of the culture that we have developed where communication, transparency and integrity are valued throughout our organization.

I wish to extend my thanks to our Trustees who bring broad and deep experience and constantly challenge the status quo.

We appreciate your support and look forward to many successful years ahead.

Sincerely,

josignaturea03.jpg

Jeffrey S. Olson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2018





NON- GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
The Company uses certain non-GAAP performance measures, in addition to the primary GAAP presentations, as we believe these measures improve the understanding of the Company's operational results. We continually evaluate the usefulness, relevance, limitations, and calculation of our reported non-GAAP performance measures to determine how best to provide relevant information to the investing public, and thus such reported measures are subject to change. The Company's non-GAAP performance measures have limitations as they do not include all items of income and expense that affect operations, and accordingly, should always be considered as supplemental financial results. FFO, FFO as Adjusted, cash NOI and same-property cash NOI are non-GAAP measures commonly used by the Company and investing public to understand and evaluate our operating results and performance. The Company believes net income is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to FFO, FFO as Adjusted, cash NOI and same-property cash NOI. Reconciliations of these measures to net income have been provided in the tables below.
Reconciliation of Net Income to FFO and FFO as Adjusted
The following table reflects the reconciliation of net income to FFO and FFO as Adjusted for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. Net income is considered the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
 
Year Ended
December 31, 2015
 
(in thousands)
 
 (per share) (2)
 
(in thousands)
 
 (per share) (2)
 
(in thousands)
 
 (per share) (2)
Net (loss) income
$
72,938

 
$
0.62

 
$
96,630

 
$
0.91

 
$
41,348

 
$
0.39

Less (net income) attributable to noncontrolling interests in:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating partnership
(5,824
)
 
(0.05
)
 
(5,812
)
 
(0.05
)
 
(2,547
)
 
(0.02
)
Consolidated subsidiaries
(44
)
 

 
(3
)
 

 
(16
)
 

Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders
67,070

 
0.57

 
90,815

 
0.86

 
38,785

 
0.37

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental property depreciation and amortization
81,401
 
0.68

 
55,484
 
0.53

 
56,619
 
0.54

Gain on sale of real estate

 

 
(15,618
)
 
(0.15
)
 

 

Real estate impairment loss
3,467

 
0.03

 

 

 

 

Limited partnership interests in operating partnership
5,824

 
0.05

 
5,812

 
0.05

 
2,547

 
0.02

FFO applicable to diluted common shareholders(1)
157,762

 
1.33

 
136,493

 
1.29

 
97,951

 
0.93

Loss on extinguishment of debt
35,336

 
0.30

 

 

 

 

Casualty loss
6,092

 
0.05

 

 

 

 

Construction settlement due to tenant
902

 
0.01

 

 

 

 

Transaction costs
278

 

 
1,405

 
0.01

 
24,011

 
0.23

One-time equity awards related to the spin-off

 

 

 

 
7,143

 
0.07

Environmental remediation costs

 

 

 

 
1,379

 
0.01

Debt restructuring expenses

 

 

 

 
1,034

 
0.01

Severance costs

 

 

 

 
693

 

Gain on sale of land
(202
)
 

 

 

 

 

Benefit related to income taxes

 

 
(625
)
 
(0.01
)
 

 

Tenant bankruptcy settlement income
(655
)
 
(0.01
)
 
(2,378
)
 
(0.02
)
 
(3,738
)
 
(0.04
)
Real estate tax settlement income related to prior periods

 

 

 

 
(532
)
 

Income tax benefit from hurricane losses
(1,767
)
 
(0.01
)
 

 

 

 

Income from acquired leasehold interest
(39,215
)
 
(0.33
)
 

 

 

 

FFO as Adjusted applicable to diluted common shareholders(1)
$
158,531

 
$
1.34

 
$
134,895

 
$
1.27

 
$
127,941

 
$
1.21

 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average diluted common shares - FFO(1)
118,392

 
 
 
106,099

 
 
 
105,375

 
 
_________________
(1) OP and LTIP Units are excluded from the calculation of earnings per diluted share for the quarter because their inclusion is anti-dilutive and are included for the year because their inclusion is dilutive. FFO per share includes units as these units are dilutive.
(2) Individual items may not add up due to total rounding.






Reconciliation of Net Income to Cash NOI and Same-Property Cash NOI

The following table reflects the reconciliation of cash NOI, same-property cash NOI (with and without redevelopment) to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

 
 
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
Net (loss) income
 
$
72,938

 
$
96,630

Add: income tax (benefit) expense
 
(278
)
 
804

Interest income
 
(2,248
)
 
(679
)
Gain on sale of real estate
 
(202
)
 
(15,618
)
Interest and debt expense
 
56,218

 
51,881

Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
35,336

 

Management and development fee income from non-owned properties
 
(1,535
)
 
(1,759
)
Other income
 
(235
)
 
(121
)
Depreciation and amortization
 
82,281

 
56,145

Casualty and impairment loss
 
7,382

 

General and administrative expense
 
30,413

 
27,438

Transaction costs
 
278

 
1,405

Less: non-cash revenue and expenses
 
(47,161
)
 
(6,465
)
Cash NOI
 
233,187

 
209,661

Adjustments
 
 
 
 
Non-same property cash NOI
 
(46,766
)
 
(28,164
)
Hurricane relates operating loss
 
1,267

 

Construction settlement due to tenant
 
902

 

Tenant bankruptcy settlement income
 
(975
)
 
(2,378
)
Same-property cash NOI
 
187,615

 
179,119

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
Cash NOI related to properties being redeveloped
 
25,304

 
22,846

Same-property cash NOI including properties in redevelopment
 
$
212,919

 
$
201,965

__________________
(1) Cash NOI is calculated as total property revenues less property operating expenses, excluding the net effects of non-cash rental income and non-cash ground rent expense.
(2) Other adjustments include revenue and expense items attributable to non-same properties and corporate activities.
(3) Tenant bankruptcy settlement income includes lease termination income.






Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

The following table reflects the reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Net income (loss) is considered the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

 
 
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
Net (loss) income
 
$
72,938

 
$
96,630

Depreciation and amortization
 
82,281

 
46,145

Interest and debt expense
 
56,218

 
51,881

Income tax (benefit) expense
 
(278
)
 
804

EBITDA
 
211,159

 
205,460

Adjustments for Adjusted EBITDA:
 
 
 
 
Casualty loss
 
6,092

 

Construction settlement due to tenant
 
902

 

Real estate impairment loss
 
3,467

 

Transaction costs
 
278

 
1,405

Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
35,336

 

Tenant bankruptcy settlement income
 
(655
)
 
(2,378
)
Gain on sale of real estate
 
(202
)
 
(15,618
)
Income from acquired leasehold interest
 
(39,215
)
 

Adjusted EBITDA
 
$
217,162

 
$
188,869