Attached files

file filename
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - PHASERX, INC.v451594_ex32.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - PHASERX, INC.v451594_ex31-2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - PHASERX, INC.v451594_ex31-1.htm
EX-10.2 - EXHIBIT 10.2 - PHASERX, INC.v451594_ex10-2.htm
EX-10.1 - EXHIBIT 10.1 - PHASERX, INC.v451594_ex10-1.htm

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _______ to _______

 

Commission file number: 001-37772

 

PhaseRx, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware   20-4690620
(State or other jurisdiction   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)    
     
410 W. Harrison Street, Suite 300  
Seattle, Washington   98119
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (206) 805-6300

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨
   
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

 

As of November 4, 2016, the registrant had 11,690,329 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

 

 

 

PHASERX, INC.

 

FORM 10-Q

 

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION  
   
Item 1. Financial Statements. 3
   
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015 3
   
Unaudited Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 4
   
Unaudited Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 5
   
Unaudited Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 6
   
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements 7
   
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. 22
   
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 38
   
Item 4. Controls and Procedures. 38
   
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION  
   
Item 1. Legal Proceedings. 39
   
Item 1A. Risk Factors. 39
   
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. 39
   
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. 40
   
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. 40
   
Item 5. Other Information. 40
   
Item 6. Exhibits. 40
   
SIGNATURES 41

 

2 

 

 

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements.

 

PhaseRx, Inc.

Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

   September 30, 2016   December 31, 2015 
   (unaudited)     
Assets          
Current assets          
Cash and cash equivalents  $8,640   $3,290 
Marketable securities   9,995    - 
Prepaids and other current assets   433    388 
Total current assets   19,068    3,678 
Property and equipment, net   278    236 
Total assets  $19,346   $3,914 
           
Liabilities, Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)          
Current liabilities          
Accounts payable  $533   $396 
Accrued liabilities   671    445 
Accrued interest   46    3,199 
Convertible notes, net of debt discount   -    19,841 
Deferred rent   8    47 
Total current liabilities   1,258    23,928 
Term loan payable, net of debt discount   5,611    - 
Preferred stock warrant liability   -    3,163 
Total liabilities   6,869    27,091 
           
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)          
Redeemable convertible preferred stock          
Series A, $0.0001 par value, no shares and 45,100,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively; no shares and 20,216,583 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively; aggregate liquidation preference of $20,217 at December 31, 2015   -    20,212 
Series A-1, $0.0001 par value, no shares and 10,500,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively; no shares and 5,500,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively; aggregate liquidation preference of $5,500 at December 31, 2015   -    5,500 
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)          
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2016   -    - 
Common stock; $0.0001 par value; 50,000,000 shares and 65,600,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively; 11,690,329 and 532,885 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively   1    1 
Additional paid-in capital   78,468    453 
Accumulated other comprehensive income   11    - 
Accumulated deficit   (66,003)   (49,343)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)   12,477    (48,889)
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity (deficit)  $19,346   $3,914 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

3 

 

 

PhaseRx, Inc.

Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

   Three Months Ended September 30   Nine Months Ended September 30 
   2016   2015   2016   2015 
     
Revenue  $-   $-   $-   $375 
                     
Operating expenses                    
Research and development   1,787    1,173    4,637    3,615 
General and administrative   1,351    320    2,910    887 
Noncash financial advising fees   -    -    7,515    - 
Total operating expenses   3,138    1,493    15,062    4,502 
Loss from operations   (3,138)   (1,493)   (15,062)   (4,127)
Interest income   28    -    34    - 
Interest expense   (233)   (480)   (1,822)   (1,050)
Other income, net   -    24    190    61 
Total other income (expense)   (205)   (456)   (1,598)   (989)
Net loss  $(3,343)  $(1,949)  $(16,660)  $(5,116)
Basic and diluted net loss per share  $(0.29)  $(3.67)  $(2.72)  $(9.95)
Shares used in computation of basic and diluted net loss per share   11,690    531    6,120    514 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

4 

 

 

PhaseRx, Inc.

Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

  

   Three Months Ended September 30   Nine Months Ended September 30 
   2016   2015   2016   2015 
Net loss  $(3,343)  $(1,949)  $(16,660)  $(5,116)
                     
Other comprehensive income:                    
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities   (3)   -    11    - 
Comprehensive loss  $(3,346)  $(1,949)  $(16,649)  $(5,116)

 

See Notes to Financial Statements

  

5 

 

 

PhaseRx, Inc.

Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

   Nine Months Ended September 30 
   2016   2015 
Operating activities          
Net loss  $(16,660)  $(5,116)
           
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:          
Noncash financial advising fees   7,515    - 
Amortization of debt discount   1,518    239 
Depreciation and amortization   115    280 
Stock-based compensation   622    16 
Noncash interest expense   124    811 
Deferred contract revenue   -    (375)
Preferred stock warrant liability   (190)   (61)
           
Changes in operating assets and liabilities          
Prepaids and other current assets   (45)   10 
Accounts payable   137    152 
Accrued liabilities   226    (207)
Deferred rent   (39)   (129)
Net cash used in operating activities   (6,677)   (4,380)
           
Investing activities          
Purchases of marketable securities   (9,984)   - 
Purchases of property and equipment   (157)   (10)
Net cash used in investing activities   (10,141)   (10)
           
Financing activities          
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs   16,475    - 
Proceeds from issuance of term loan, net of issuance costs   5,693    - 
Proceeds from issuance of convertible note, net of issuance costs   -    2,446 
Proceeds from exercise of common stock warrants   -    10 
Proceeds from issuance of original issue discount promissory note   400    - 
Payment of original issue discount promissory note   (400)   - 
Net cash provided by financing activities   22,168    2,456 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   5,350    (1,934)
           
Cash and cash equivalents          
Beginning of period   3,290    2,031 
End of period  $8,640   $97 
           
Noncash investing and financing activities:          
Accretion of Series A preferred stock  $4   $5 
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock   25,716    - 
Conversion of notes payable into common stock   19,404    - 
Conversion of bridge loan into common stock   4,086    - 
Debt discount for beneficial conversion feature on bridge loan   1,021    - 
Warrant liability reclassified to equity upon expiration   535    - 
Debt discount for warrant issued in connection with term loan payable   205    - 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements

 

6 

 

 

Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements

 

1. Business and Basis of Presentation

 

PhaseRx, Inc. (referred to as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on March 9, 2006 and is located in Seattle, Washington. We are a biopharmaceutical company developing a portfolio of products for the treatment of inherited enzyme deficiencies in the liver using intracellular enzyme replacement therapy, or i-ERT. Our i-ERT approach is enabled by our proprietary Hybrid messenger RNA, or mRNA, Technology platform, which allows synthesis of the missing enzyme inside the cell. Our initial product portfolio targets the three urea cycle disorders ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, or OTCD, argininosuccinate lyase deficiency, or ASL deficiency, and argininosuccinate synthetase deficiency, or ASS1 deficiency. In June 2016, we selected PRX-OTC as our lead product candidate for treatment of OTCD and demonstrated preclinical proof of concept for a second product candidate PRX-ASL, for the treatment of ASL deficiency. We expect to obtain human clinical safety and efficacy data in OTCD patients for our first program in 2018.

 

Our activities since inception have consisted principally of performing research and development activities and raising capital. Our activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including possible failure of preclinical testing and failing to secure additional funding before we achieve sustainable revenue and profit from operations. As of September 30, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of $66.0 million.

 

Initial Public Offering

 

In May 2016, we completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) and sold 3,700,000 shares of common stock at a price of $5.00 per share to the public. The shares began trading on The NASDAQ Capital Market on May 18, 2016. The aggregate net proceeds received by us from the IPO, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses, was $16.5 million. Immediately prior to the pricing of the IPO, all then outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock, convertible notes and loans were converted into 7,040,380 shares of common stock and warrants were exercised by cashless exercise to purchase 303,096 shares of common stock. The related carrying value of shares of preferred stock, notes and warrants in the aggregate amount of $51.6 million was reclassified as common stock and additional paid-in capital. Additionally, we amended and restated our certificate of incorporation, effective May 17, 2016 to, among other things, change the authorized number of shares of common stock to 50,000,000 and the authorized number of shares of preferred stock to 5,000,000.

 

Prior to the IPO, our recurring operating losses raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. After we successfully completed the IPO and secured a term loan with Hercules Capital, Inc. (see detailed disclosure in note 4) we believe we have sufficient cash to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying interim balance sheet as of September 30, 2016, the statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the statements of comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and the statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and the related footnote disclosures are unaudited. The accompanying unaudited financial statements reflect, in the opinion of our management, all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations, comprehensive loss and cash flows for each period presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted from the accompanying statements. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes thereto included in our final prospectus dated May 17, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) on May 18, 2016. The accompanying financial information as of December 31, 2015 has been derived from the audited 2015 financial statements included in the final prospectus. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016, or any other future period.

 

7 

 

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

In preparing these financial statements, management has made its best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, fair value measurements, financing activities, accruals and other contingencies.

 

Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities

 

We invest our excess cash in investment grade short- to intermediate-term fixed income securities. Such investments are included in cash and cash equivalents or marketable securities, on the balance sheets, classified as available-for-sale and reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains and losses on the sale of these securities are recognized in net income or loss. We consider all highly liquid investments with original maturities at purchase of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents, an investment with a maturity greater than twelve months from the balance sheet date as long-term marketable securities and a maturity less than twelve months as short-term at the balance sheet date. Our cash equivalents and marketable securities consist principally of commercial paper and money market securities.

 

Interest earned on securities is included in interest income. Gains are recognized when realized in our statements of operations. Losses are recognized when realized or when we have determined that an other-than-temporary decline in fair value has occurred. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

 

We periodically evaluate whether declines in fair values of our investments below their cost are other-than-temporary. This evaluation consists of several qualitative and quantitative factors regarding the severity and duration of the unrealized loss as well as our ability and intent to hold the investment until a forecasted recovery occurs. Factors considered include quoted market prices, recent financial results and operating trends, credit quality of debt instrument issuers, other publicly available information that may affect the value of our investments, duration and severity of the decline in value, and our strategy and intentions for holding the investment. Additionally, we assess whether it is more likely than not we will be required to sell any investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis.

 

8 

 

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

We establish the fair value of our assets and liabilities using the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We established a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 

Level 1:  Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2:  Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly.

 

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore determined using estimates and assumptions developed by us, which reflect those that a market participant would use.

 

We measure and report at fair value our cash equivalents and marketable securities. The carrying value of accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to their relative short maturities. The carrying value of our Hercules term loan approximates fair value because the interest rate is reflective of the rate we could obtain on debt with similar terms and conditions. We estimated the fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability using Level 3 inputs.

 

We may apply the fair value option to any eligible financial assets or liabilities, which permits an instrument by instrument irrevocable election to account for selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. To date, we have not applied this election.

 

Deferred Financing Costs

 

We defer costs related to the issuance of debt and include them on the accompanying balance sheets as a deduction from the debt liability. Deferred financing costs are amortized over the term of the related loan using the effective interest method and are included as a component of interest expense on the accompanying statements of operations.

 

9 

 

 

Research and Development Costs

 

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs include salaries and personnel-related costs, consulting fees, fees paid for contract research services, the costs of laboratory supplies, equipment and facilities, license fees and other external costs. Non-refundable advance payments for goods or services to be received in the future for use in research and development activities are deferred and capitalized. The capitalized amounts are expensed as the related goods are delivered or the services are performed.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

We expense the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of such instruments. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the fair value of any equity instruments on the grant date. We recognize stock-based compensation, net of estimated forfeitures, on the graded-vesting method as expense over the requisite service period. The use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires management to make assumptions with respect to volatility, expected option term and fair value of our common stock. Measurement of stock-based compensation for options granted to nonemployees is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instruments vest.

 

We have granted stock options with performance conditions to certain executive officers and directors. At each reporting date, we evaluate whether the achievement of the performance conditions is probable. Compensation expense is recorded over the appropriate service period based upon our assessment of achievement of each performance condition or the occurrence of the event which will trigger the options to vest.

 

Comprehensive Loss

 

Comprehensive loss is comprised of net loss and other comprehensive income or loss. Other comprehensive income or loss consists of unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities.

 

Net Loss Per Share

 

The computation of basic and diluted net loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period and excludes all outstanding stock options, warrants, preferred stock, as well as shares issuable upon conversion of all outstanding convertible notes and term loans from the calculation of diluted net loss per common share, as all such securities are anti-dilutive to the computation for all the periods presented. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the computation of diluted net loss per share excluded 1,446,658 shares. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the computation of diluted net loss per share excluded 6,321,842 shares.

 

10 

 

 

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share:

 

   Three Months Ended September 30,   Nine Months Ended September  30, 
   2016   2015   2016   2015 
   (In thousands, except per share amounts) 
                 
Net loss  $(3,343)  $(1,949)  $(16,660)  $(5,116)
                     
Weighted average shares used in computation of basic and diluted net loss per share   11,690    531    6,120    514 
                     
Basic and diluted net loss per share  $(0.29)  $(3.67)  $(2.72)  $(9.95)

 

Concentration of Risk

 

We maintain our cash, cash equivalents and investments with high quality, accredited financial institutions. These amounts at times may exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any credit losses in such accounts and do not believe we are exposed to significant risk on these funds. Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances of $18.5 million and $3.0 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were uninsured.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standard Update, or ASU, No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition . This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The ASU is effective for public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. In June 2015, the FASB deferred for one year the effective date of the new revenue guidance, with an option that would permit companies to adopt the guidance as early as the original effective date. Early adoption prior to the original effective date is not permitted. We are evaluating the impact this guidance may have on our revenue recognition, but do not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

11 

 

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The ASU is intended to provide more transparent and economically neutral information about the assets and liabilities that arise from leases than previous guidance. The ASU is effective for public entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, and adoption must be applied on a modified retrospective basis. We are evaluating the impact of this guidance but do not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting which amends ASC 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. The ASU includes provisions intended to simplify various provisions related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. The ASU is effective for public entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. We are evaluating the impact of this guidance but do not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments: Credit Losses that changes the impairment model for most financial instruments, including trade receivables from an incurred loss method to a new forward-looking approach, based on expected losses. The estimate of expected credit losses will require entities to incorporate considerations of historical information, current information and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This ASU is effective for us in the first quarter of 2020 and must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition approach. We are evaluating the impact of this guidance but do not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments that clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for us in the first quarter of 2018 with early adoption permitted and must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. We are evaluating the impact of this guidance but do not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

3. Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities

 

We did not have any available-for-sale security holdings in 2015. Securities available-for-sale at cost and fair market value by contractual maturity as of September 30, 2016 were as follows:

 

   Cost or
Amortized
Cost
   Fair
Value
 
   (In thousands) 
         
Due in one year or less  $9,984   $9,995 
Due after one year through two years   -    - 
           
   $9,984   $9,995 

 

12 

 

 

We did not incur any realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. None of the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for more than 12 months as of September 30, 2016.

 

Marketable securities available-for-sale consisted of the following as of September 30, 2016:

 

   Cost or
Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   Fair
Value
 
   (In thousands) 
Commercial paper  $9,984   $11   $-   $9,995 
                     
   $9,984   $11   $-   $9,995 

 

Fair values were determined for each individual security in the investment portfolio. We utilize third-party pricing services for all security valuations. We review the pricing methodology, including the collection of market information, used by the third-party pricing services. On a periodic basis, we also review and validate the pricing information received from the third-party providers.

 

13 

 

 

4. Term Loan, Convertible Notes Payable and Other Debt

 

Hercules Term Loan and Warrants

 

On June 7, 2016, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) by and among us, the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties to the Loan Agreement (the “Lenders”) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (“Hercules”), in its capacity as administrative agent for itself and the Lenders, pursuant to which the Lenders agreed to make a term loan available to us for working capital and general business purposes, in a principal amount of up to $8 million (the “Term Loan”). On June 7, 2016, the Lenders funded $6 million of the Term Loan. An additional $2 million of the Term Loan may be requested by us during the period commencing upon us entering into an arms-length strategic corporate development transaction that is validating in the agent’s and Lenders’ sole discretion (the “Milestone Event”) and ending upon the earlier to occur of (a) December 15, 2016, (b) the date which is 45 days after the consummation of the Milestone Event and (c) the occurrence of an event of default under the Loan Agreement. The Term Loan is secured by substantially all of our assets other than our intellectual property.

 

The Term Loan bears interest at a floating annual rate equal to the greater of (i) 9.25% and (ii) the sum of (a) 9.25%, plus (b) the prime rate as reported by The Wall Street Journal minus 3.50%, resulting in a rate of 9.25% as of September 30, 2016. We are required to make interest payments in cash on the first business day of each month, beginning on July 1, 2016. The Term Loan will begin amortizing on July 3, 2017, in equal monthly installments of principal and interest, with such payments beginning on July 3, 2017, and continuing on the first business day of each month thereafter until the Term Loan is repaid. The final maturity date of the Term Loan is December 2, 2019. Upon repayment of the term loan, we are required to pay an end of term charge to the Lenders equal to 5.85% of the aggregate original principal amount of all Term Loan advances extended by the Lenders to us.

 

At our option, we may prepay all or any portion of the outstanding principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest with respect to the principal balance being prepaid of the Term Loan, subject to a prepayment fee of 3% of the amount prepaid if the prepayment occurs on or prior to June 7, 2017, 2% of the amount prepaid if the prepayment occurs after June 7, 2017 but on or prior to June 7, 2018, or 1% of the amount prepaid if the prepayment occurs after June 7, 2018.

 

In connection with the Loan Agreement, we also issued to Hercules Technology III, L.P., as the sole Lender on June 7, 2016, a warrant to purchase up to 63,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. In the event that any additional Term Loans are made to us, the warrant will be exercisable for up to an additional number of shares of common stock equal to (i) $105,000 divided by (ii) the volume-weighted average daily price for a share of common stock for the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day immediately preceding the date on which the warrant becomes exercisable for such additional shares (the “Additional Shares Exercise Price”), at the Additional Shares Exercise Price. The warrant may be exercised either for cash or on a cashless “net exercise” basis. The warrant is immediately exercisable and expires on June 7, 2021.

 

The warrant issued met the requirements to be accounted for as equity. The $212,000 fair value of the warrant was determined using the Black-Scholes option model with the following assumptions: no dividend yield; expected life of 5 years; risk-free interest rate of 1.23%; and volatility rate of 81.6%. The proceeds from the Term Loan were allocated between the debt and warrant based on their relative fair values. The relative fair value of the warrant amounted to $205,000 and was recorded as an increase in the additional paid-in capital and debt discount.

 

14 

 

 

The total debt discount, inclusive of the end of term charge and other fees, amounted to $659,000 related to this Term Loan is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the Term Loan.

 

15 

 

 

Interest expense

 

We recognized total interest expense of $233,000 and $480,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We recognized total interest expense of $1.8 million and $1.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

5. Fair Value Measurements

 

The following table sets forth the fair value of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

 

 

16 

 

 

   September 30, 2016 
Description  Balance   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
   (In thousands) 
Financial Assets:                    
                     
Money market  $7,527   $7,527   $-   $- 
Commercial paper   10,995    1,000    9,995    - 
                     
Total financial assets  $18,522   $8,527   $9,995   $- 
                     
Add Cash:   113                
                     
Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities  $18,635                
                     
Financial Liabilities:                    
                     
Preferred stock warrant liability  $-   $-   $-   $- 
                     
Total financial liabilities  $-   $-   $-   $- 

 

   December 31, 2015 
Description  Balance   Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
   (In thousands) 
Financial Assets:                    
                     
Money market  $-   $-   $-   $- 
Commercial paper                    
                     
Total financial assets  $-   $-   $-   $- 
                     
Add Cash:  $3,290                
                     
Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities  $3,290                
                     
Financial Liabilities:                    
                     
Preferred stock warrant liability  $3,163   $-   $-   $3,163 
                     
Total financial liabilities  $3,163   $-   $-   $3,163 

 

The warrants exercisable into Series A preferred stock were issued in connection with the issuance of convertible notes. We determined the fair value of warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions (level 3 inputs): no dividend yield; expected life ranging from 3.1 to 7.0 years; risk-free interest rates ranging from 1.3% to 2.1%; and volatility rates ranging from 84.0% to 97.7%. The value of our underlying preferred stock was assumed to be equal to Series A preferred stock liquidation preference value of $1.00 per share.

 

17 

 

 

The changes in the balances of the Level 3 preferred stock warrant liability measured at fair value for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

 

   2016   2015 
         
Balance as of January 1,  $3,163   $2,695 
Change in fair value   (81)   (23)
Balance as of March 31,   3,082    2,672 
Additional preferred stock warrants issued   -    246 
Change in fair value   (109)   (15)
Warrants exercised   (2,438)   - 
Warrants expired   (535)   - 
Balance as of June 30,  -   2,903 
 Additional preferred stock warrants issued        123 
Change in fair value        (23)
Balance as of September 30,  $-   $3,003 

 

18 

 

 

6. Stock-Based Compensation  

 

We granted incentive stock options to employees and members of the board of directors for their services on the board of directors and nonqualified stock options to nonemployee consultants for their consulting services. Options, in general, either vest in 48 equal monthly installments or 25% on the first year anniversary and 1/48 th of the granted options monthly thereafter, such that options are fully vested on the four-year anniversary of the date of grant.

 

           Weighted     
           Average   Average 
       Weighted   Remaining   Intrinsic 
   Number of   Average   Contractual   Value 
   Stock Options   Exercise Price   Life   (in thousands) 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015   443,779   $0.9537           
                     
Options granted   955,917    3.7834           
Options forfeited   (28,203)   5.0800           
Option exercised   (1,968)   0.0407           
                     
Outstanding at September 30, 2016   1,369,525   $2.8452    8.50   $896,804 
                     
Exercisable at September 30, 2016   394,098   $1.6767    6.28   $439,594 

 

At September 30, 2016 we had unrecognized compensation cost of $1.7 million and will be recognized over the weighted-average remaining service period of approximately 1.7 years.

 

Stock-based compensation expense has been included in the Statement of Operations as follows (in thousands):

 

   Three months ended
September 30,
   Nine months ended
September 30,
 
   2016   2015   2016   2015 
                 
Research and development  $167   $4   $197   $13 
General and administrative   299    1    425    3 
   $466   $5   $622   $16 

 

19 

 

 

The fair value of the stock options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

   Nine Months Ended September 30, 
   2016   2015 
         
Weighted average estimated fair value per share  $2.60   $0.08 
           
Weighted average assumptions:          
Dividend yields   -    - 
Expected term (years)   5.9    6.0 
Risk free interest rate   1.4%   1.7%
Volatility   80.3%   89.6%

 

The risk-free interest rates used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model are based on the implied yield currently available in United States Treasury securities at maturity with an equivalent term. We have limited stock option exercise information. Accordingly, the expected term of stock options granted was calculated using the simplified method, which represents the average of the contractual term of the stock option and the weighted-average vesting period of the stock option. We have not declared or paid any dividends and do not currently expect to do so in the foreseeable future. The value of our underlying common stock was determined by the board of directors, which relied in part upon the report of third party valuation specialists and input from our management prior to the IPO. Expected volatility is based on an average volatility of stock prices for a group of similar publicly traded companies. The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

 

20 

 

 

7. Commitments and Contingencies

 

In February 2010, we entered into two lease agreements for approximately 14,200 square feet of office, research and development facilities, which became effective in May 2010. The landlord of the facilities is one of our investors. Each lease was for a 65 month term, with a five-year renewal option. Both of the lease agreements included reduced rental payments in the initial years of the 65 month term. In September 2015, we entered agreements to extend the leases to August 2016. We calculated the total rent due over the lease term and are recording equal monthly rent expense over the term. Differences between the recorded rent expense and actual rent paid each month result in an increase or decrease to deferred rent. We also received incentives from the landlord totaling $605,000 to fund certain tenant improvements. These improvements were capitalized as leasehold improvements, with a corresponding credit recorded to deferred rent. The deferred rent balance is being reduced in equal monthly installments over the lease term as a reduction to rent expense. On February 23, 2016, we entered into agreements to extend the terms of the leases to November 30, 2016.

 

In September 2016, we extended the term of the lease agreements through November 30, 2021. In addition to minimum rent, the leases also require payment of real estate taxes, insurance, common area maintenance charge and other costs. These costs are not included in the table below. We recognize rent expense under such arrangements on a straight-line basis over the effective term of the leases. The following table summarizes our future minimum lease commitments as of September 30, 2016 (in thousands):

 

Year ending December 31:     
2016  $144,012 
2017   614,666 
2018   633,106 
2019   652,100 
2020   671,663 
Thereafter   632,580 
      
Total minimum lease payments  $3,348,127 

 

Rent expense for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $206,000 and $174,000, respectively. Rent expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $618,000 and $494,000, respectively.

 

21 

 

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

The following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our operating results, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows as of and for the periods presented below. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Unless the context provides otherwise, all references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “PhaseRx,” “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” or similar terms, refer to PhaseRx, Inc. and its directly and indirectly owned subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy, prospective products, product approvals, timing and likelihood of success, plans and objectives of management for future operations, and future results of current and anticipated products are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

 

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “could,” “intend,” “target,” “project,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions described under the sections in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our final prospectus dated May 17, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, on May 18, 2016. Because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified and some of which are beyond our control, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The events and circumstances reflected in our forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. New risk factors and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all risk factors and uncertainties. Except as required by applicable law, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein, whether as a result of any new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise.

 

22 

 

 

Overview

 

We are a biopharmaceutical company developing a portfolio of products for the treatment of inherited enzyme deficiencies in the liver using intracellular enzyme replacement therapy, or i-ERT, and expect to generate clinical safety and efficacy data in 2018. We are not aware of any other enzyme replacement therapies for intracellular enzyme deficiencies currently being marketed for inherited enzyme deficiencies in the liver, and believe that the commercial potential for i-ERT is completely untapped and similar to the large and growing $4 billion worldwide market for conventional enzyme replacement therapy, or ERT, which includes drugs such as Cerezyme ® . Our i-ERT approach is enabled by our proprietary Hybrid messenger RNA, or Hybrid mRNA Technology™ platform, which allows synthesis of the missing enzyme inside the cell. Our initial product portfolio targets the three urea cycle disorders ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, or OTCD, argininosuccinate lyase deficiency, or ASL deficiency, and argininosuccinate synthetase deficiency, or ASS1 deficiency. We have preclinical proofs of concept in two mouse models of the urea cycle disorders showing significant reductions in the level of blood ammonia, which we believe is an approvable endpoint by the Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, for the demonstration of efficacy in human clinical trials of the urea cycle disorders. To our knowledge, there are no ERT products on the market to treat these diseases, because the urea cycle reaction occurs inside the cell and is inaccessible to the administered enzyme. In contrast, we expect delivery of the missing enzyme using i-ERT with our Hybrid mRNA Technology to be a promising approach to treat these patients. Beyond the urea cycle disorders, we believe there are a significant number of inherited disorders of metabolism in the liver that are candidates for our therapeutic approach and that our Hybrid mRNA Technology can be adapted to develop mRNA therapeutics for the treatment of other inherited liver disorders using our platform.

 

Our i-ERT approach is accomplished by delivering normal copies of the mRNA that make the missing enzyme inside the liver cell, thereby enabling proper physiological function and correcting the disease. A key challenge with mRNA therapeutics historically has been their satisfactory delivery into the patients’ cells. We believe that our Hybrid mRNA Technology addresses these difficulties and enables synthesis of the desired protein in the hepatocyte, which is the chief functional cell type in the liver harboring the metabolic cycles that need to be corrected in metabolic liver diseases. We believe our technology is superior to alternative technologies because, based upon peer-reviewed journal articles and presentations of our competitors and our internal preclinical studies, it results in high-level synthesis of the desired protein in the hepatocyte, has better tolerability and can be repeat-dosed without loss of effectiveness, thus enabling treatment of chronic conditions.

 

We are focused on inherited, single-gene disorders of metabolism in the liver that result in deficiency of an intracellular enzyme and thus have been unable to be treated with conventional ERT. Some inherited orphan liver diseases, such as the lysosomal storage disorders, can be successfully treated with conventional ERT. However, this approach does not work for many of the inherited orphan liver diseases, including the urea cycle disorders, because the missing enzyme is inside the cell, and the administered enzyme is unable to get inside the target cell where it is needed to be therapeutically active. Our approach is to deliver mRNA encoding the missing enzyme into the cell using our Hybrid mRNA Technology, such that the mRNA makes the missing enzyme inside the cell, restores the intracellular enzyme function and corrects the disease.

  

23 

 

 

As noted above, our initial focus is on urea cycle disorders, which are a group of rare genetic diseases generally characterized by the body’s inability to remove ammonia from the blood. The urea cycle consists of several enzymes, including OTC, ASL and ASS1. Since the urea cycle reactions occur inside the cell, conventional ERT does not work as a treatment for these disorders. Urea cycle disorders are caused by a genetic mutation that results in a deficiency of one of the enzymes of the urea cycle that is responsible for removing ammonia from the bloodstream, causing elevated levels of ammonia in the blood. The elevated ammonia then reaches the brain through the circulation, where it causes cumulative and irreversible neurological damage, and can result in coma and death. While currently marketed ammonia scavengers such as Ravicti ® (glycerol phenylbutyrate) and Buphenyl ® (sodium phenylbutyrate) provide palliative care of the symptoms, liver transplant is the only currently available cure for urea cycle disorders. Our goal is to treat the urea cycle disorders by intravenous delivery of mRNA that makes the relevant missing urea cycle enzyme inside the cell, thus reinstating control of blood ammonia. We believe that anticipated improvements in newborn screening and the availability of corrective therapy will lead to improved diagnosis and survival rates among patients with urea cycle disorders.

 

We have three therapeutic urea cycle disorder programs under development: PRX-OTC to treat OTCD, PRX-ASL to treat ASL deficiency and PRX-ASS1 to treat ASS1 deficiency. Preclinical efficacy has been established for PRX-OTC with two biological measures, including normalization of the level of ammonia in the blood. In June 2016, we selected PRX-OTC as our lead product candidate and demonstrated preclinical proof of concept for the treatment of a second product candidate, PRX-ASL. We plan to scale up the manufacturing of PRX-OTC and to test the safety and efficacy of the Hybrid mRNA Technology in large animals by the end of 2016. We intend to initiate Investigational New Drug-enabling, or IND-enabling, studies in the first half of 2017 and plan to start manufacturing clinical supplies of the lead urea cycle disorder product candidate consistent with current good manufacturing practices, or cGMP, in the third quarter of 2017. We expect to file an IND application with the FDA in the fourth quarter of 2017 for this candidate and to conduct Phase 2a/2b single- and repeat-dose clinical proof of concept studies in OTCD patients that are expected to generate Phase 2a safety and efficacy data in the first half of 2018 and Phase 2b safety and efficacy data in the second half of 2018, including measurement of reduction in blood ammonia.

 

Financial Overview

 

Our operations have been funded, to date, primarily through the sale of our common stock in the initial public offering, or the IPO, debt financing, a series of private placements of convertible preferred stock and issuance of convertible notes and warrants. From our inception through September 30, 2016, we have raised an aggregate of approximately $69.6 million to fund our operations, of which approximately $16.5 million, net of $2.0 million in costs, was from our IPO in May 2016, $25.7 million was from the issuance of preferred stock and approximately $20.2 million was from the issuance of convertible notes and warrants and $5.7 million, net of $307,000 in costs, from a secured term loan from Hercules Capital, Inc., or Hercules. In addition, we received a $1.5 million upfront fee from Synageva BioPharma Corp., or Synageva, in 2014 pursuant to a collaboration and development agreement with Synageva.

 

24 

 

 

Operating Losses

 

Since our inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net losses were $3.3 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our net losses were $16.7 million and $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of September 30, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of $66.0 million. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses over the next several years. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year. We anticipate that our expenses will increase significantly as we plan to conduct our preclinical studies, scale up the manufacturing process, advance our research programs into clinical trials, continue to discover, validate and develop additional product candidates, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio, and hire additional development and scientific personnel. In addition, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company.

 

Revenue

 

We currently do not have any products approved for sale in any jurisdiction and have not generated any revenue from product sales.

 

Research and Development Expenses

 

Our research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for our research activities, including our drug discovery efforts, and the development of our product candidates, which include the following:

 

25 

 

 

  employee-related expenses, including salaries, benefits, travel and stock-based compensation;
     
  external research and development expenses incurred under arrangements with third parties, such as consulting fees, research testing and preclinical studies of our product candidates;
     
  laboratory supplies, and acquiring, developing and manufacturing preclinical study materials;
     
  license fees; and
     
  costs of facilities, depreciation and other expenses.

 

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. In certain circumstances, we will make non-refundable advance payments to purchase goods and services for future use pursuant to contractual arrangements. In those instances, we defer and recognize an expense in the period that we receive or consume the goods or services.

 

At any point in time, we typically have various early stage research and drug discovery projects ongoing. Our internal resources, employees and infrastructure are not directly tied to any one research or drug discovery project and are typically deployed across multiple projects. As such, we do not maintain information regarding the costs incurred for these early stage research and drug discovery programs on a project-specific basis.

 

The nature and efforts required to complete a prospective research and development project are typically indeterminable at very early stages when research is primarily conceptual and may have multiple applications. Once a focus towards developing a specific product candidate has been developed, we obtain more visibility into the efforts that may be required to reach conclusion of the development phase. However, there are inherent risks and uncertainties in developing novel biologics in a rapidly-changing industry environment. To obtain approval of a product candidate from the FDA, we must, among other requirements, submit data supporting safety and efficacy as well as detailed information on the manufacture and composition of the product candidate. In most cases, this entails extensive laboratory tests and preclinical and clinical trials. The collection of this data, as well as the preparation of applications for review by the FDA, is costly in time and effort, and may require significant capital investment.

 

26 

 

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related benefits, including stock-based compensation, related to our executive, finance and support functions and not otherwise included in research and development expenses. Other general and administrative expenses include allocated facility related costs not otherwise included in research and development expenses, professional fees for auditing, tax, investor relations, legal services and travel expenses. We expect that general and administrative expenses will increase in the future as we expand our operating activities and incur additional costs associated with being a publicly-traded company. These increases will include legal fees, accounting fees, directors’ and officers’ liability insurance premiums and fees associated with investor relations.

 

Interest Expense

 

Interest expense consists primarily of cash and non-cash interest expense related to our convertible notes and term loans.

 

On June 7, 2016, we entered into a loan and security agreement by and among us, the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties to the loan and security agreement and Hercules, in its capacity as administrative agent for itself and the lenders, pursuant to which the lenders agreed to make a term loan available to us for working capital and general business purposes, in a principal amount of up to $8 million, or the Hercules Loan. On June 7, 2016, the lenders funded $6 million of the term loan, and we received $5.7 million, net of issuance costs. An additional $2 million may be requested by us during the draw period as set forth in the loan and security agreement commencing upon us entering into an arms-length strategic corporate development transaction.

 

The Hercules Loan bears interest at a floating annual rate equal to the greater of (i) 9.25% and (ii) the sum of (a) 9.25%, plus (b) the prime rate as reported by The Wall Street Journal minus 3.50%, resulting in a rate of 9.25% as of September 30, 2016. We are required to make interest payments in cash on the first business day of each month, beginning on July 1, 2016. The Term Loan will begin amortizing on July 3, 2017, in equal monthly installments of principal and interest, with such payments beginning on July 3, 2017, and continuing on the first business day of each month thereafter until the Term Loan is repaid. The final maturity date of the Term Loan is December 2, 2019. Upon repayment of the term loan, we also require to pay an end of term charge to the Lenders equal to 5.85% of the aggregate original principal amount of all Term Loan advances extended by the Lenders to us.

 

On December 21, 2015, we entered into a loan and security agreement with 17 investors, pursuant to which these investors made term loans to us in the aggregate principal amount of $4.0 million. Interest accrued on the term loans at the rate of 5% per annum. The entire outstanding principal balance of $4.0 million of the term loans together with all accrued and unpaid interest of $86,000 were converted into 1,021,525 shares of our common stock upon the closing of our IPO, at a conversion price equal to 80% of the IPO offering price. The value of the beneficial conversion feature of $1.0 million was recorded as a discount with an offsetting credit to additional paid-in capital. The discount was fully amortized to interest expense on the conversion date.

 

27 

 

 

On May 2, 2016, we issued an original issue discount promissory note in the aggregate amount of $440,000 payable to a lender in exchange for a $400,000 loan. The note was repaid after the closing of the IPO.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our audited and unaudited financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to accrued expenses and stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience, known trends and events, and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in the notes to our audited financial statements included in our final prospectus dated May 17, 2016, filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4) under the Securities Act on May 18, 2016, we believe the following accounting policies to be most critical to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.

 

Research and Development Costs

 

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs include salaries and personnel related costs, consulting fees, fees paid for contract research services, the costs of laboratory supplies, equipment and facilities, license fees and other external costs. Non-refundable advance payments for goods or services to be received in the future for use in research and development activities are deferred and capitalized. The capitalized amounts are expensed as the related goods are delivered or the services are performed.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

We establish the fair value of our assets and liabilities using the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We established a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 

Level 1:  Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

28 

 

 

Level 2:  Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly.

 

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore determined using estimates and assumptions developed by us, which reflect those that a market participant would use.

 

We may apply the fair value option to any eligible financial assets or liabilities, which permits an instrument by instrument irrevocable election to account for selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. To date, we have not applied this election.

 

Deferred Financing Costs

 

We defer costs related to the issuance of debt which are included on the accompanying balance sheets as a deduction from the debt liability. Deferred financing costs are amortized over the term of the related loan and are included as a component of interest expense on the accompanying statements of operations.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

We expense the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of such instruments. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the fair value of any equity instruments on the grant date. We recognize stock-based compensation, net of estimated forfeitures, on the graded-vesting method as expense over the requisite service period. The use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires management to make assumptions with respect to volatility, expected option term and fair value of our common stock. Measurement of stock-based compensation for options granted to non-employees is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instruments vest. We have granted options with performance conditions to certain executive officers and directors. At each reporting date, we evaluate whether the achievement of the performance conditions is probable. Compensation expense is recorded over the appropriate service period based upon our assessment of the achievement of each performance condition or the occurrence of the event which will trigger the options to vest. 

 

29 

 

 

We recorded stock-based compensation expense in the Statements of Operations as follows (in thousands):

 

   Three months ended September 30   Nine months ended September 30 
   2016   2015   2016   2015 
                 
Research and development  $167   $4   $197   $13 
General and administrative   299    1    425    3 
   $466   $5   $622   $16 

 

All stock options are granted at a price no less than the fair value per share of our common stock. Prior to the IPO, the fair value of our common stock underlying options granted was determined by the board of directors who relied, in part, upon independent third party valuation analyses and input from our management on each grant date. We used valuation techniques and methods that rely on recommendations by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, or AICPA, in its Accounting and Valuation Guide, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation, 2013, and conformed to generally accepted valuation practices.

 

30 

 

 

JOBS Act

 

Section 107 of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or JOBS Act, provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Thus, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this extended transition period and, as a result, we will adopt new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for other companies.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standard Update, or ASU, No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The ASU is effective for public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. In June 2015, the FASB deferred for one year the effective date of the new revenue guidance, with an option that would permit companies to adopt the standard as early as the original effective date. Early adoption prior to the original effective date is not permitted. We are evaluating the impact this guidance may have on our revenue recognition, but do not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on our financial statements.

  

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The ASU is intended to provide more transparent and economically neutral information about the assets and liabilities that arise from leases than previous guidance. The ASU is effective for public entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, and adoption must be applied on a modified retrospective basis. We are evaluating the impact of this guidance but do not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

31 

 

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting which amends ASC 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. The ASU includes provisions intended to simplify various provisions related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. The ASU is effective for public entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. We are evaluating the impact of this guidance but do not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments: Credit Losses that changes the impairment model for most financial instruments, including trade receivables from an incurred loss method to a new forward-looking approach, based on expected losses. The estimate of expected credit losses will require entities to incorporate considerations of historical information, current information and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This ASU is effective for us in the first quarter of 2020 and must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition approach. We are evaluating the impact of this guidance but do not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments that clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for us in the first quarter of 2018 with early adoption permitted and must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. We are evaluating the impact of this guidance but do not expect that the adoption will have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

Results of Operations

 

Comparison of Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015

 

The following table sets forth information concerning our operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:

 

   Three Months Ended September 30   Nine Months Ended September 30 
   2016   2015   2016   2015 
   (In thousands) 
Revenue  $-   $-   $-   $375 
                     
Operating expenses                    
Research and development   1,787    1,173    4,637    3,615 
General and administrative   1,351    320    2,910    887 
Noncash financial advising fees   -    -    7,515    - 
Total operating expenses   3,138    1,493    15,062    4,502 
Loss from operations   (3,138)   (1,493)   (15,062)   (4,127)
Interest income   28    -    34    - 
Interest expense   (233)   (480)   (1,822)   (1,050)
Other income, net   -    24    190    61 
Total other expense   (205)   (456)   (1,598)   (989)
Net loss  $(3,343)  $(1,949)  $(16,660)  $(5,116)

 

Research and Development Expenses

 

Research and development expenses were $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, and $4.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $3.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

 

The increase of $614,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2016 and the increase of $1.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were primarily due to an increase in research activities to execute the development plan of our lead drug candidate, PRX-OTC. In the three months ended September 30, 2016, payroll and consultant costs increased by $308,000, contract research, supplies and facility costs increased by $156,000, and noncash stock-based compensation increased by $148,000. In the nine months ended September 30, 2016, payroll and consultant costs increased by $569,000, contract research, supplies and facility costs increased by $333,000, and noncash stock-based compensation increased by $169,000.

 

In June 2016, we announced product pipeline advancements including the selection of our lead product candidate, PRX-OTC, for treatment of OTCD and positive proof-of-concept data for a second product candidate, PRX-ASL, for treatment of ASL deficiency.

 

32 

 

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

General and administrative expenses were $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $320,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, and $2.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $887,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

 

The increase of $1.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 was primarily due to an increase in compensation costs of $537,000 due to $242,000 from increased headcount and $295,000 from increased noncash stock-based compensation expense. Additionally, the costs associated with being a publicly-traded company including legal, consulting, travel expenses, insurance and fees, increased by $504,000.

 

The increase of $2.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was primarily due to additional costs of $1.0 million associated with our IPO and being a publicly-traded company including legal, consulting, travel expenses, insurance and fees. Additionally, compensation costs increased by $1.0 million due to $592,000 from increased headcount and $417,000 from increased noncash stock-based compensation expense.

 

Noncash Financial Advising Fees

 

In the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we recorded $7.5 million of noncash financial advising fees.

 

In December 2015, we engaged Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC, or Palladium, to serve as a non-exclusive agent in connection with a bridge loan financing and as a non-exclusive advisor in connection with our IPO and for the provision of general capital markets advice. Prior to the consummation of the bridge loan financing, we determined, following discussions with Palladium, to request certain of our stockholders to transfer an aggregate of 1,393,880 shares of our common stock to Titan Multi-Strategy Fund I, LTD, or Titan, and certain of its third-party designees at a nominal purchase price in order to induce Titan to serve as the initial committed investor in the bridge financing and also in expectation of receiving other support from Titan, Palladium and their respective contacts in connection with our proposed initial public offering, including introductions to certain prospective underwriters. The sales of shares were completed immediately prior to the IPO. We recorded the fair value of this stock amounting to $7.0 million, based on the IPO price of $5.00 per share, as a non-cash financial advising fee to reflect the economic benefits that we received from the contributions by our principal stockholders.

 

We also issued Palladium, as consideration for serving as a non-exclusive advisor, 112,000 shares of our common stock in June 2016. We valued the stock based on the IPO price of $5.00 per share as we determined that the fair market value of the stock was more readily determinable than the fair value of the services received. The $560,000 fair value of the stock was recorded as a non-cash financial advising fee in June 2016.

 

33 

 

 

Interest Expense

 

Interest expense was $233,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $480,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. This decrease of $247,000 was due to a decrease in outstanding debt and its related amortization of debt discount.

 

Interest expense was $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase of $772,000 was primarily due to the amortization of the value of the beneficial conversion feature of the December 2015 convertible loan upon the closing of our IPO in May 2016, partially offset by the decrease in interest expense due to lower outstanding debt balance and its related amortization of debt discount after the IPO.

 

Other Income

 

We did not have any other income for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $24,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. Other income was $190,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $61,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Other income was recorded when the fair value of the warrants exercisable into Series A preferred stock decreased. All warrants exercisable into preferred stock were either exercised or canceled upon the closing of the IPO in May 2016, and therefore, no other income was recorded after the IPO.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

From inception to September 30, 2016, we have incurred an accumulated deficit of $66.0 million. We have financed our operations since inception primarily with the net proceeds of approximately $16.5 million from the sale of our common stock in our IPO in May 2016, the net proceeds of $5.7 million from Hercules, $25.7 million from the sales of shares of our convertible preferred stock and $20.2 million from the issuance of convertible notes and warrants. We also received a $1.5 million upfront fee pursuant to a development agreement in 2014. At September 30, 2016, we had $18.6 million of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. We anticipate that we will continue to incur losses, and that such losses will increase over the next several years due to development costs associated with our urea cycle disorder programs. We expect that our research and development and general and administrative expenses will continue to increase and, as a result, we will need additional capital to fund our operations, which we may raise through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, other third-party funding and other collaborations and strategic alliances.

 

Initial Public Offering

 

On May 23, 2016, we closed our IPO and sold 3,700,000 shares of common stock at a price of $5.00 per share to the public. The aggregate net proceeds received by us from the offering, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses, were $16.5 million.

 

Hercules Loan – June 2016 Loan and Security Agreement

 

On June 7, 2016, we entered into a loan and security agreement by and among us, the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties to the loan and security agreement and Hercules, in its capacity as administrative agent for itself and the lenders, pursuant to which the lenders agreed to make a term loan available to us for working capital and general business purposes, in a principal amount of up to $8 million. On June 7, 2016, the lenders funded $6 million of the term loan, and we received $5.7 million, net of related expenses. An additional $2 million may be requested by us during the period commencing upon us entering into an arms-length strategic corporate development transaction that is validating in the agent’s and lenders’ sole discretion, or the Milestone Event, and ending upon the earlier to occur of (a) December 15, 2016, (b) the date which is 45 days after the consummation of the Milestone Event and (c) the occurrence of an event of default under the loan and security agreement. The Hercules Loan is secured by substantially all of our assets other than our intellectual property.

 

The Hercules Loan bears interest at a floating annual rate equal to the greater of (i) 9.25% and (ii) the sum of (a) 9.25%, plus (b) the prime rate as reported by The Wall Street Journal minus 3.50%, resulting in a rate of 9.25% as of September 30, 2016. Beginning on July 1, 2016, we are required to make interest payments in cash on the first business day of each month. The Hercules Loan will begin amortizing on July 3, 2017, in equal monthly installments of principal and interest, with such payments beginning on July 3, 2017, and continuing on the first business day of each month thereafter until the Hercules Loan is repaid. The final maturity date of the Hercules Loan is December 2, 2019. Upon repayment of the Hercules Loan, we are required to pay an end of term charge to the lenders equal to 5.85% of the aggregate original principal amount of all Hercules Loan advances extended by the lenders to us.

 

At our option, we may prepay all or any portion of the outstanding principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest with respect to the principal balance being prepaid of the Hercules Loan, subject to a prepayment fee of 3.00% of the amount prepaid if the prepayment occurs on or prior to June 7, 2017, 2.00% of the amount prepaid if the prepayment occurs after June 7, 2017 but on or prior to June 7, 2018, or 1.00% of the amount prepaid if the prepayment occurs after June 7, 2018.

 

34 

 

 

Convertible Loan- Bridge Loan Financing - December 2015 Loan and Security Agreement

 

On December 11, 2015, we issued a promissory note to Titan in exchange for $500,000. On December 21, 2015, we entered into a loan and security agreement with 17 investors, which was subsequently amended on April 6, 2016, pursuant to which Titan converted its note and certain investors made new term loans to us in the aggregate principal amount of $4.0 million. The term loans closed on December 21, 2015, and we received from the escrow agent net proceeds of approximately $3.2 million, after deducting certain fees and expenses. Interest accrues on the term loans at the rate of 5% per annum. The entire outstanding principal amount of the term loans together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon converted into shares of our common stock upon the closing of our IPO.

 

Convertible Notes

 

Prior to 2016 we issued to investors, including beneficial owners of more than 5% of our capital stock, convertible promissory notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $16.2 million and seven-year warrants to purchase shares of the same class and series of capital stock into which the notes convert. The notes carried interest at a rate of 8% per annum. On December 11, 2015, the noteholders agreed that for purposes of calculating the number of conversion shares, the notes ceased accruing interest as of December 31, 2015. The accrued interest payable on convertible notes payable totaled $3.2 million as of December 31, 2015. Immediately prior to the consummation of the IPO, the convertible notes and unpaid accrued interest thereon were converted into 2,788,880 shares of our common stock, and the seven-year warrants to purchase 2,452,242 shares of preferred stock with an exercise price of $0.01 were exercised on a cashless basis to purchase 303,096 shares of our common stock. Warrants to purchase 1,049,999 shares of preferred stock with an exercise price of $1.00 expired upon the IPO.

 

Promissory Note

 

On May 2, 2016, we issued an original issue discount promissory note in the aggregate amount of $440,000 payable to a lender in exchange for a $400,000 loan. The note was repaid after the closing of the IPO.

 

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of September 30, 2016 will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next 12 months. In addition, we intend to pursue a combination of sales of additional equity securities and strategic partnerships to further finance our operations. However, our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations is a forward-looking statement that involves risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary materially. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect.

 

Our primary uses of cash are to fund operating expenses, research and development expenditures and to pay interest and principle payments of our loan. Cash used to fund operating expenses is impacted by the timing of when we pay these expenses, as reflected in the change in our outstanding accounts payable and accrued expenses.

 

Our future capital requirements are difficult to forecast and will depend on many factors, including:

 

  the initiation, progress, timing, costs and completion of preclinical studies of our lead product and potential product candidates;

 

35 

 

 

  the number and characteristics of product candidates that we pursue;
     
  the progress, costs and results of our clinical trials;
     
  the terms and timing of any other strategic alliance, licensing and other arrangements that we may establish;
     
  the outcome, timing and cost of regulatory approvals;
     
  delays that may be caused by changing regulatory requirements;
     
  the costs and timing of hiring new employees to support our continued growth;
     
  the costs required for operating a public company; and
     
  the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products or technologies.

 

The following table shows a summary of our cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

 

   Nine Months Ended September 30 
   2016   2015 
   (unaudited) 
Net cash provided by (used in)          
Operating activities  $(6,677)  $(4,380)
Investing activities   (10,141)   (10)
Financing activities   22,168    2,456 
   $5,350   $(1,934)

 

36 

 

 

Operating Activities

 

Net cash used in operating activities increased from $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $6.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in net cash used in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was primarily due to approximately $1.0 million in costs associated with our IPO and costs of being a publicly-traded company including legal, consulting, travel expenses and insurance, and increased payroll costs of $474,000 from increased headcount and salaries. Research and development costs also increased due to an increase in research activities as we continued to develop our portfolio of products for the treatment of inherited enzyme deficiencies in the liver and to execute the development plan of our lead drug candidate PRX-OTC.  

 

Investing Activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities increased from $10,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $10.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in net cash used in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was primarily due to investing $10.0 million of our excess cash in investment grade marketable securities.

 

Financing Activities

 

Net cash provided by financing activities increased from $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $22.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in net cash provided by financing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was primarily due to the net proceeds of $16.5 million from our IPO and the net proceeds of $5.7 million from the Hercules Loan received in June 2016. Net cash provided by financing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $2.5 million, which was the net proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes and warrants.

 

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have not engaged in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements through special purpose entities.

 

Emerging Growth Company Status

 

Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to “opt out” of such extended transition period, and as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.

 

37 

 

 

We have elected to avail ourselves of the following provisions of the JOBS Act:

 

  not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
     
  reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports, proxy statements and registration statements; and
     
  exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected scaled disclosure obligations and therefore are not required to provide this information.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

 

(a)           Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, have concluded that, based on such evaluation, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

 

(b)          Changes in Internal Controls. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, identified in connection with the evaluation of such internal control that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

38 

 

 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

 

From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings, the adverse outcome of which, in our management’s opinion, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on the results of our operations or financial position. There are no material proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates or any registered or beneficial stockholder of more than 5% of our common stock is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

The Risk Factors included in our final prospectus dated May 17, 2016, filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4) under the Securities Act on May 18, 2016, have not materially changed.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

(a) Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

 

None.

 

(b) Use of Proceeds

 

On May 17, 2016, the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-210811) for our IPO of common stock was declared effective by the SEC, pursuant to which we sold an aggregate 3,700,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $5.00 per share for an aggregate offering price of $18.5 million. Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd. and Roth Capital Partners, LLC acted as joint book-running managers, and Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd. acted as the representative of the underwriters. We received net proceeds from the IPO of approximately $16.5 million, after deducting approximately $2.0 million of underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses. None of these expenses consisted of payments made by us to directors, officers or persons owning 10% or more of our common stock or to their associates, or to our affiliates.

 

As of September 30, 2016, approximately $3.9 million of the $16.5 million of net proceeds from our IPO had been used, of which approximately $440,000 was used to pay off the original issue discount promissory note, $184,000 was used to achieve preclinical proof of concept for the treatment of a second urea cycle disorder and approximately $426,000 was used to select a urea cycle disorder product candidate for further development, $688,000 was used in preclinical activities, $909,000 was used to scale up the manufacturing of PRX-OTC and $1.2 million was used in general and administrative expenses.   None of these payments consisted of payments made by us to directors, officers or persons owning 10% or more of our common stock or to their associates, or to our affiliates, other than payments made in the ordinary course of business to officers for salaries and to non-employee directors as compensation for board or board committee services and as fees for consulting services.

 

We expect to use the proceeds from our IPO in connection with our ongoing activities as described in our final prospectus dated May 17, 2016, filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4) under the Securities Act on May 18, 2016, as we:

 

  · scale up the manufacturing of the lead urea cycle disorder product candidate;

 

  · complete GMP-manufacturing and GLP-compliant toxicology studies; and

 

  · file an IND application with the FDA for this product candidate.

 

We have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from our IPO. We may find it necessary or advisable to use the net proceeds from this offering for other purposes than those described in our final prospectus.

 

The Registration Statement on Form S-1 included a prospectus to be used in connection with the potential resale by certain selling stockholders of up to an aggregate of 1,021,525 shares of our common stock issuable upon mandatory conversion of certain of our outstanding loans upon completion of the IPO. We did not receive any proceeds from the sale by selling stockholders of shares of common stock registered on the Registration Statement on Form S-1.

 

39 

 

 

(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the quarter ended September 30, 2016.

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 5. Other Information.

 

None.

 

Item 6. Exhibits.

 

See Index to Exhibits.

 

40 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

  PHASERX, INC.
     
Date: November 7, 2016 By: /s/ Robert Overell
    Robert W. Overell
    Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
     
Date: November 7, 2016 By: /s/ Shing-Yin Tsui 
    Shing-Yin (Helen) Tsui
    Senior Vice President, Finance and Secretary
    (Principal Accounting Officer)

 

41 

 

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit
No.
  Description
3.1   Fourth amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, as presently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 23, 2016)
     
3.2   Amended and Restated Bylaws, as presently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 23, 2016)
   
10.1*   Seventh amendment to Lease, dated September 27, 2016, by and between ARE-SEATTLE No. 10, LLC and PhaseRx, Inc., for 410 W. Harrison, Seattle, Washington
   
10.2*   Fifth amendment to Lease, dated September 27, 2016, by and between ARE-SEATTLE No. 10 LLC and PhaseRx, Inc., for 410 Elliott, Seattle, Washington
     
31.1*   Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
31.2*   Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
32*   Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
101*   The following materials from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015, (ii) Unaudited Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, (iii) Unaudited Condensed Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, (iv) Unaudited Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, and (v) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

 

* Filed herewith.

 

42