Exhibit 13.01

To the Limited Partners of

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned, the information contained herein is accurate and complete.

By:		Patrick T. Egan
		President and Director
		Ceres Managed Futures LLC
		General Partner,
		Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.
Ceres Managed Futures LLC
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10036
(855) 672-4468

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over

Financial Reporting

Ceres Managed Futures LLC (“Ceres”), is the general partner of Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P. (the “Partnership”) and is responsible for the management of the Partnership.

Management of the Partnership, Ceres (“Management”), is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a – 15(f) and 15d – 15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and for the assessment of internal control over financial reporting. The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;

(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Partnership are being made only in accordance with authorizations of Management and the directors of Ceres; and

(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection and correction of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. In making this assessment, Management used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on its assessment, Management concluded that the Partnership maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria referred to above.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P. (the “Partnership”), including the condensed schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related statements of income and expenses and changes in partners’ capital for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P. as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and changes in its partners’ capital for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Statements of Financial Condition

December 31, 2015 and 2014

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2015

U.S. Government Securities

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2014

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Statements of Income and Expenses

for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital

for the years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P. (“Premier Graham” or the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized to engage primarily in the speculative trading of futures contracts, options on futures and forward contracts, and forward contracts on physical commodities and other commodity interests, including, but not limited to, foreign currencies, financial instruments, metals, energy, and agricultural products (collectively, “Futures Interests”) (refer to Note 4, “Financial Instruments”). The General Partner (defined below) may also determine to invest up to all of the Partnership’s assets in United States (“U.S.”) Treasury bills and/or money market mutual funds, including money market mutual funds managed by Morgan Stanley or its affiliates.

Ceres Managed Futures LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, acts as the general partner (“Ceres” or the “General Partner”) and commodity pool operator of the Partnership. Ceres is a wholly- owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC (“MSSBH”). MSSBH is wholly-owned indirectly by Morgan Stanley. Prior to June 28, 2013, Citigroup Inc. was the indirect minority owner of MSSBH. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC is doing business as Morgan Stanley Wealth Management (“Morgan Stanley Wealth Management”). This entity previously acted as a non-clearing commodity broker for the Partnership and currently acts as the placement agent (the “Placement Agent”) for the Partnership. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management is a principal subsidiary of MSSBH.

The clearing commodity broker is Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS&Co.”). MS&Co. also acts as the counterparty on all trading of foreign currency forward contracts. MS&Co. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley.

Effective June 1, 2011, units of limited partnership interest (“Unit(s)”) of the Partnership were being offered in two share classes, and beginning on November 1, 2015 class Z units were offered (each a “Class” or collectively, the “Classes”). The Class of Units that a limited partner receives generally depends on the aggregate subscription amount made by such limited partner in the Partnership, although the General Partner may determine to offer Units to investors at its discretion.

Class Z Units may be offered to certain employees of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management and its affiliates (and their family members).

All Units outstanding are considered Class A Units. The General Partner may, at its discretion, offer additional Classes of Units as described in the private placement memorandum of the Partnership, as amended from time to time (the “Memorandum”).

Ceres is required to maintain a 1% minimum interest in the equity of the Partnership and income (losses) are shared by Ceres and the limited partners based on their proportional ownership interest.

In July 2015, the General Partner delegated certain administrative functions to SS&C Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, currently doing business as SS&C GlobeOp (the “Administrator”). Pursuant to a master services agreement, the Administrator furnished certain administrative, accounting, regulatory, reporting, tax and other services as agreed from time to time. In addition, the Administrator maintained certain books and records of the Partnership. The General Partner pays or reimburses the Partnership, from the administrative and General Partner fee (formerly, the brokerage fee) (described in Note 2g) it receives, the ordinary administrative expenses of the Partnership. This includes the expenses related to the engagement of the Administrator. Therefore, the engagement of the Administrator did not impact the Partnership’s break-even point.

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

The Placement Agent pays a portion of the ongoing Placement Agent fees it receives from the Partnership to the Morgan Stanley Financial Advisor or Private Wealth Advisor responsible for selling the Units to the limited partners. Certain limited partners (other than ERISA/IRA investors) may be deemed to hold Class Z Units. Class Z Units are not subject to ongoing placement agent fees.

Effective April 1, 2014, the ongoing placement agent fee paid by the Partnership to Morgan Stanley Wealth Management was reduced for Class A Unit holders from an annual rate of 3.375% to an annual rate of 2.00% of the net asset value of a limited partner’s Class A Units.

No selling commissions or charges related to the initial offering of Units are paid by the limited partners or the Partnership. MS&Co. pays all such costs.

The Partnership, in its normal course of business, enters into various contracts with MS&Co. acting as its commodity broker. Pursuant to the brokerage agreement with MS&Co., to the extent that such trading results in unrealized gains or losses, these amounts are offset for the Partnership and are reported on a net basis in the Statements of Financial Condition.

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

The Partnership has offset its unrealized gains or losses on forward contracts executed with the same counterparty as allowable under the terms of its master netting agreement with MS&Co., the counterparty on such contracts. The Partnership has consistently applied its right to offset.

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

Ceres, on behalf of the Partnership, has retained Graham Capital Management L.P. (“Graham” or the “Trading Advisor”) to make all trading decisions for the Partnership.

Compensation to the Trading Advisor by the Partnership consists of a management fee and an incentive fee as follows:

Management Fee — The Partnership pays the Trading Advisor a flat-rate monthly fee equal to 1/12th of 1.75% (a 1.75% annual rate) of the Partnership’s net assets (plus “notional” funds, if any) as of the first day of each month. Prior to April 2014, the monthly management fee paid by the Partnership to the Trading Advisor was equal to 1/12th of 2.00% (a 2.00% annual rate).

Incentive Fee — The Partnership pays the Trading Advisor an incentive fee equal to 20% of trading profits experienced by the Partnership as of the end of each calendar month.

Trading profits represent the amount by which profits from futures, forwards, and options trading exceed losses after ongoing placement agent, management and administrative and General Partner’s fees are deducted. When the Trading Advisor experiences losses with respect to net assets as of the end of a calendar month, the Trading Advisor must recover such losses before the Trading Advisor is eligible for an incentive fee in the future. Cumulative trading losses are adjusted on a pro-rated basis for the amount of each month’s net additions or withdrawals.

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

The Partnership trades Futures Interests. Futures and forwards represent contracts for delayed delivery of an instrument at a specified date and price.

The fair value of an exchange-traded contract is based on the settlement price quoted by the exchange on the day with respect to which fair value is being determined. If an exchange-traded contract could not have been liquidated on such day due to the operation of daily limits or other rules of the exchange, the settlement price will be equal to the settlement price on the first subsequent day on which the contract could be liquidated.

The exchange-traded contracts and the off-exchange traded contracts are fair valued on a daily basis.

The Partnership’s contracts are accounted for on a trade-date basis. Gains or losses are realized when the contracts are liquidated and are determined using the first-in, first-out method.

The net unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, reported as a component of “Equity in trading account” in the Statements of Financial Condition, and their longest contract maturities were as follows:

In general, the risks associated with off-exchange-traded contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded contracts because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an off-exchange-traded contract. The Partnership has credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance. As of the date of the financial statements, the credit risk associated with the instruments in which the Partnership trades is limited to the unrealized gain (loss) amounts reflected in the Partnership’s Statements of Financial Condition. The net unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts are further disclosed by type of contract and corresponding fair value level in Note 6. “Fair Value Measurements.”

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

The Partnership also has credit risk because MS&Co. acts as the futures commission merchant or the counterparty, with respect to most of the Partnership’s assets. Exchange-traded futures, exchange-traded forward and exchange-traded futures-styled option contracts are fair valued on a daily basis, with variations in value settled on a daily basis. MS&Co., which is acting as a commodity futures broker for the Partnership’s exchange-traded futures, exchange-traded forward and exchange-traded futures-styled option contracts, is required, pursuant to regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, to segregate from its own assets, and for the sole benefit of its commodity customers, total cash and unrealized gain (loss) on open exchange-traded contracts with MS&Co., acting as a commodity broker for the Partnership trading of Futures Interests, totaling $58,120,223 and $177,020,452 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. With respect to the Partnership’s off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts, there are no daily settlements of variation in value, nor is there any requirement that an amount equal to the net unrealized gains (losses) on such contracts be segregated. However, the Partnership is required to meet margin requirements equal to the net unrealized loss on open forward currency contracts in the Partnership’s account with the counterparty, which is accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash balance in a custody account held at MS&Co., for the benefit of MS&Co. With respect to those off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts, the Partnership is at risk to the ability of MS&Co., the sole counterparty on all such contracts, to perform. The Partnership has a netting agreement with MS&Co. The primary terms are based on industry standard master netting agreements. This agreement, which seeks to reduce both the Partnership’s and MS&Co.’s exposure on off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts, should materially decrease the Partnership’s credit risk in the event of MS&Co.’s bankruptcy or insolvency.

The General Partner monitors and attempts to control the Partnership’s risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and, accordingly, believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership may be subject. These monitoring systems generally allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, online monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forwards and options positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The futures, forwards and options traded, and the U.S. Treasury bills held, by the Partnership involve varying degrees of related market risk. Market risk is often dependent upon changes in the level or volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, and prices of financial instruments and commodities, factors that result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s open positions, and consequently, in its earnings, whether realized or unrealized, and cash flow. Gains and losses on open positions of exchange-traded futures and exchange-traded forward contracts are settled daily through variation margin. Gains and losses on off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts are settled upon termination of the contract.

The Partnership’s objective is to profit from speculative trading in Futures Interests. Therefore, the Trading Advisor will take speculative positions in Futures Interests where it feels the best profit opportunities exist for its trading strategy. As such, the average number of contracts outstanding in absolute quantities (the total of the open long and open short positions) has been presented as a part of the volume disclosure, as position direction is not an indicative factor in such volume disclosures. With regard to foreign currency forward trades, each notional quantity amount has been converted to an equivalent contract based upon an industry convention.

As of December 31, 2015, approximately 74.6% of the Partnership’s total investments are futures contracts which are exchange-traded while approximately 25.4% are forward contracts which are off-exchange traded.

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

The following tables summarize the gross and net amounts relating to assets and liabilities of the Partnership’s derivatives and their offsetting subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Managed Futures Premier Graham L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

The effect of Trading Activities in the Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

December 31, 2015

    December 31, 2014

The following table indicates the trading gains and losses by market sector, on derivative instruments for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Partnership’s Fair Value Measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to fair values derived from unobservable inputs (Level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

The fair value of exchange-traded futures, forward and option contracts is determined by the various exchanges, and reflects the settlement price for each contract as of the close of business on the last business day of the reporting period. The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period from various exchanges. The fair value of non-exchange-traded foreign currency option contracts is calculated by applying an industry standard model application for options valuation of foreign currency options, using as input the spot prices, interest rates and option implied volatilities quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period. U.S. Treasury bills are valued at the last available bid price received from independent pricing services as of the close of the last business day of the reporting period.

The Partnership considers prices for exchange-traded commodity futures, forward, swap and option contracts to be based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1). The values of U.S. Treasury bills, non-exchange-traded forward, swap and certain option contracts for which market quotations are not readily available are priced by broker quotes or pricing services that derive fair values for those assets and liabilities from observable inputs (Level 2). As of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Partnership did not hold any derivative instruments that were priced at fair value using unobservable inputs through the application of the General Partner’s assumptions and internal valuation pricing models (Level 3). Transfers between levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, there were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2.

The following tables presents information about the Partnership’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

Financial highlights for the limited partner class for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:

The above ratios and total return may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the year. Additionally, these ratios are calculated for the limited partner class using the limited partners’ share of income, expenses and average net assets of the Partnership and includes income and expenses.