Exhibit 99.1

Enviva Partners, LP Reports Results Exceeding Guidance

BETHESDA, MD, February 17, 2016 — Enviva Partners, LP (NYSE: EVA) (the “Partnership” or “we”) today reported financial and operating results for the fourth quarter and full-year 2015.

Financial Highlights for the Quarter:

“In contrast to the challenging market conditions in the broader energy sector, we completed 2015 with continued strong operating performance that exceeded our guidance, and we successfully executed the Southampton Drop-Down,” said John Keppler, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  “With the stability of our long-term off-take agreements and growing cash flows, we expect to distribute at least $2.10 per unit for 2016, a 27 percent increase over the annualized minimum quarterly distribution announced at our IPO less than a year ago.”

Basis of Presentation

On December 11, 2015, we consummated the acquisition of the fully operational 510,000 metric tons per year (“MTPY”) wood pellet production plant in Southampton County, Virginia, a ten-year 500,000 MTPY take-or-pay off-take contract (385,000 metric tons in the first year), and a matching ten-year shipping contract (collectively, the “Southampton Drop-Down”) from our sponsor’s joint venture.  We owned the Southampton plant for periods prior to April 9, 2015 and after December 11, 2015.  Because this was a transfer between entities under common control, all financial results were required to be recast to include the results of the Southampton Drop-Down for the applicable period, such that Southampton’s results for April 9, 2015 to December 11, 2015 are now included in our GAAP results, and certain intercompany transactions between us and Southampton during such period were eliminated.  Unless otherwise indicated, the financial results presented in this release are recast on this basis.

Financial Results

For the fourth quarter of 2015, we generated net revenue of $116.8 million, a $37.8 million, or 48 percent, increase over the corresponding quarter of last year.  The increase in revenue was driven by higher sales volumes attributable to the contracts included in the acquisition of the Cottondale plant.  For the fourth quarter, we generated net income of $9.0 million compared to $2.3 million for the corresponding quarter in 2014.  The increase in net income was a result of the higher revenues as well as a $0.8 million utility refund received by one of our facilities.  Adjusted EBITDA improved

to $21.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2015, a 130 percent increase compared to the corresponding period in 2014.  The improvement was driven by the factors mentioned above, a decrease in operating costs and raw materials, and lower export shipping costs.  The increase in adjusted EBITDA was partially offset by unfavorable pricing on a contracted shipment inherited as part of the Cottondale plant acquisition.  The Partnership’s distributable cash flow for the fourth quarter was $18.0 million.

Assuming the Southampton Drop-Down had not occurred, fourth quarter 2015 adjusted EBITDA would have been $17.1 million and distributable cash flow would have been $14.0 million, each higher than the guidance of $14.8 million to $15.8 million of adjusted EBITDA and $11.3 million to $12.3 million of distributable cash flow provided on November 5, 2015.  Performance exceeded our guidance as a result of optimization of shipping and sourcing contracts, timing of maintenance outages, supplier incentive payments, and lower operating costs, which were partially offset by lower sales on ships in port at the end of the year.

For full-year 2015, we generated net revenue of $457.4 million, a $167.3 million, or 58 percent, increase over last year.  For 2015, we generated net income of $23.1 million compared to $0.2 million in 2014.  The increases in revenue and net income were primarily the result of additional contracted sales volume, partially offset by higher general and administrative costs, including costs associated with being a public company.  Adjusted EBITDA increased to $77.3 million in 2015, a 173 percent increase compared to 2014.  The improvement was driven by higher sales volume, lower operating and raw material costs, more favorable pricing under our customer contracts, and lower export shipping costs.  The Partnership’s distributable cash flow for the year was $62.8 million.

Distribution

As announced February 3, 2016, the board of directors of the Partnership’s general partner (the “Board”) declared a cash distribution of $0.4600 per common and subordinated unit for the fourth quarter of 2015.  Distributable cash flow for the quarter, inclusive of the results of the Southampton Drop-Down only from December 11, 2015 through the end of the quarter, was $14.5 million, resulting in a distribution coverage ratio of 1.28 times.  The distribution is approximately 5 percent higher than the third quarter distribution and approximately 12 percent higher than the Partnership’s minimum quarterly distribution, which was paid on a prorated basis for the second quarter following our initial public offering on April 29, 2015.  The fourth quarter distribution will be paid Monday, February 29, 2016, to unitholders of record as of the close of business Wednesday, February 17, 2016.

Outlook and Guidance

Consistent with the guidance provided on December 14, 2015, the Partnership expects net income for full-year 2016 to be in the range of $43.0 million to $47.0 million and adjusted EBITDA to be in the range of $83.0 million to $87.0 million.  The Partnership expects to incur maintenance capital expenditures of $4.1 million and interest expense net of amortization of debt issuance costs and original issue discount of $11.9 million in 2016.  As a result, the Partnership expects to generate distributable cash flow for full-year 2016 in the range of $67.0 million to $71.0 million, or $2.71 to $2.87 per common and subordinated unit, prior to any distributions paid to the general partner.  For full-year 2016, we expect to distribute at least $2.10 per common and subordinated unit.  The

2

guidance amounts provided above do not include the impact of any potential acquisitions from the Partnership’s sponsor or others.  Although deliveries to our customers are generally ratable over the year, the Partnership’s quarterly income and cash flow are subject to modest seasonality in the first quarter and to the mix of customer shipments made, which may vary from period to period.  As such, the Board evaluates the Partnership’s distribution coverage ratio on an annual basis when determining the distribution for a quarter.

Market and Contracting Update

Independent industry experts Hawkins Wright recently projected that worldwide demand for industrial wood pellets will increase to more than 27 million tons in 2019 driven predominantly by biomass consumption in Europe and Asia, representing an annual growth rate of more than 20 percent.  The following are key recent developments:

·                  E.ON completed the sale of its 556 megawatt (“MW”) Langerlo power facility in Belgium to a buyer that intends to convert the facility from coal to wood pellet fuel.  The off-take contract to supply wood pellets that the Partnership announced in December 2015, which commences in 2017, has been assigned to the new owner of the Langerlo facility.  Recently, German Pellets GmbH, which is affiliated with the new owner, filed for insolvency in a German court.  Neither the Langerlo project nor the new owner are part of the filing, but we continue to monitor German Pellets GmbH’s financial distress and its potential impact on the project, our off-take contract, and advances currently in escrow.  The Partnership’s weighted average remaining term of off-take contracts is 8.0 years with the Langerlo contract or 7.2 years without it, absent consideration of other recently executed contracts.

·                  MGT Power’s Teesside Renewable Energy Plant (the “Tees REP”) is expected to commence construction in the second quarter of 2016.  Macquarie is partnering with MGT Power to bring the Tees REP to financial close.  Enviva Wilmington Holdings, LLC (the “Hancock JV”), our sponsor’s joint venture with affiliates of John Hancock Life Insurance Company, executed a new take-or-pay contract (the “MGT Contract”) to be the sole source supplier for imported biomass fuel, with nearly 1 million tons needed annually by the 299 MW combined heat and power plant.  Deliveries under the MGT Contract are expected to commence in 2019 and continue through 2034.  The Partnership then entered into a contract with the Hancock JV to supply 375,000 MTPY of the contracted volume to the Tees REP (the “EVA-MGT Contract”).  The EVA-MGT Contract is denominated in British Pound Sterling and commences in 2019, ramps to full supply in 2021, and continues through 2034.  Both contracts are contingent upon Tees REP reaching financial close.

·                  Following the successful conclusion of the EU state-aid review process of its U.K. government-backed CfD, RWE sold the 420 MW Lynemouth facility to Energetický a průmyslový holding (“EPH”), a vertically integrated energy utility with operations throughout Europe.  EPH plans to convert the coal facility to wood pellet fuel by the end of 2017.  After conversion, this project is expected to generate demand for approximately 1.5 million tons of wood pellets annually.

·                  In the Netherlands, the Minister of Economic Affairs confirmed a significant increase in the budget for the renewable incentive scheme from 3.5 billion euros in 2015 to 8.0 billion euros in 2016.  Following the Paris Climate Change Conference in late 2015, the Dutch parliament is now considering a complete phase-out of coal-fired generation.  Although a phase-out

3

could expand the use of biomass significantly given the potential for full conversions of coal facilities to biomass in lieu of the 10-15 percent co-firing currently contemplated, uncertainty surrounding the future of coal-fired power likely delays our utility customers’ applications for renewable incentives until the fall when more information from the government on the possibility of a coal phase-out is expected.

“As recent contract activity demonstrates, our portfolio of assets and track-record of execution continue to distinguish Enviva as the preferred supplier to power generators around the world seeking to use wood pellets as a drop-in replacement for coal,” said Mr. Keppler.  “We look forward to continuing to capitalize on opportunities in our core market in Europe as well as in other geographies and pellet applications as demand continues to grow.”

Sponsor Activity

On December 11, 2015, the Partnership completed the Southampton Drop-Down.  The $131 million purchase price for the Southampton Drop-Down was financed with $36.5 million in debt, $15.0 million in equity issued to the Partnership’s sponsor, and cash on hand.

Our sponsor continues to progress construction of the 515,000 MTPY production plant in Sampson County, North Carolina (the “Sampson plant”) and a deep-water marine terminal in Wilmington, North Carolina (the “Wilmington terminal”). Commissioning of the Sampson plant has begun and our sponsor expects to commence operations in the second quarter of 2016.  The Partnership expects to have the opportunity to acquire the Sampson plant, along with a ten-year 420,000 MTPY off-take contract with an affiliate of DONG Energy, in late 2016 and the Wilmington terminal in 2017.

Subject to Tees REP reaching financial close, our sponsor and affiliates of John Hancock Life Insurance Company have committed the necessary capital to the Hancock JV to construct a new wood pellet production plant that can supply at least 500,000 MTPY of the volume required by the MGT Contract.

Conference Call

We will host a conference call with executive management related to our fourth quarter 2015 results and to discuss our outlook, guidance, and a more detailed market update at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) on Thursday, February 18, 2016.  We plan to provide reference materials during the conference call that will be available through a webcast.  Information on how interested parties may listen to the conference call and view the webcast is available in the Investor Relations page of our website (www.envivabiomass.com).  A replay of the conference call will be available on our website after the live call concludes.

About Enviva Partners, LP

Enviva Partners, LP (NYSE: EVA) is a publicly traded master limited partnership that aggregates a natural resource, wood fiber, and processes it into a transportable form, wood pellets.  The Partnership sells a significant majority of its wood pellets through long-term, take-or-pay agreements with creditworthy customers in the United Kingdom and Europe.  The Partnership owns and operates six plants in Southampton County, Virginia; Northampton County and Ahoskie, North Carolina; Amory and Wiggins, Mississippi; and Cottondale, Florida.  We have a combined production capacity of approximately 2.2 million metric tons of wood pellets per year.  In addition, the Partnership owns a deep-water marine terminal at the Port of Chesapeake, Virginia, which is used to export wood pellets. Enviva Partners also exports pellets through the ports of Mobile, Alabama and Panama City, Florida.

To learn more about Enviva Partners, LP, please visit our website at www.envivabiomass.com.

4

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We view adjusted gross margin per metric ton, adjusted EBITDA, and distributable cash flow as important indicators of performance.  We also view measures provided in this release that (i) do not give effect to the recast of financial results and assume the Southampton Drop-Down had not occurred or (ii) include financial results of acquired assets only for the periods actually owned by the Partnership as important indicators of our performance.

Adjusted Gross Margin per Metric Ton

We define adjusted gross margin as gross margin excluding depreciation and amortization included in cost of goods sold.  We believe adjusted gross margin per metric ton is a meaningful measure because it compares our off-take pricing to our operating costs for a view of profitability and performance on a per metric ton basis.  Adjusted gross margin per metric ton will primarily be affected by our ability to meet targeted production volumes and to control direct and indirect costs associated with procurement and delivery of wood fiber to our production plants and the production and distribution of wood pellets.

Adjusted EBITDA

We define adjusted EBITDA as net income or loss excluding depreciation and amortization, interest expense, taxes, early retirement of debt obligation, non-cash unit compensation expense, asset impairments and disposals, and certain items of income or loss that we characterize as unrepresentative of our operations.  Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental measure used by our management and other users of our financial statements, such as investors, commercial banks, and research analysts, to assess the financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods or capital structure.

Distributable Cash Flow

We define distributable cash flow as adjusted EBITDA less maintenance capital expenditures and interest expense net of amortization of debt issuance costs and original issue discount.  Distributable cash flow is used as a supplemental measure by our management and other users of our financial statements as it provides important information relating to the relationship between our financial operating performance and our ability to make cash distributions.

Adjusted gross margin per metric ton, adjusted EBITDA, and distributable cash flow are not financial measures presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).  We believe that the presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures provides useful information to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations.  Our non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as alternatives to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.  Each of these non-GAAP financial measures has important limitations as an analytical tool because they exclude some, but not all, items that affect the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.  You should not consider adjusted gross margin per metric ton, adjusted EBITDA, or distributable cash flow in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP.  Our definitions of these non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing their utility.

5

The following tables present a reconciliation of adjusted gross margin per metric ton, adjusted EBITDA, and distributable cash flow to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, as applicable, for each of the periods indicated.

(1)         Excludes depreciation of office furniture and equipment. Such amount is included in general and administrative expenses.

6

The following tables present, in each case for the three months ending December 31, 2015:

·                  our recast results prepared in accordance with GAAP, including Southampton’s results for periods we did not own Southampton and elimination of certain intercompany transactions;

·                  our results including the acquired assets only for the period actually owned by the Partnership; and

·                  what our results would have been assuming the Southampton Drop-Down had not occurred, and the intercompany transactions had not been eliminated.

7

The following table provides a reconciliation of the estimated range of adjusted EBITDA and Distributable Cash Flow to the estimated range of net income, in each case for the twelve months ending December 31, 2016 (in millions except per unit figures):

(1)         Prior to any distributions paid to our general partner; based on the number of common and subordinated units outstanding at year-end 2015 of 24,755,233

8

Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements and information in this press release, including those concerning our future results of operations, acquisition opportunities, and distributions, may constitute “forward-looking statements.”  The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “foresee,” “should,” “would,” “could,” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which are generally not historical in nature.  These forward-looking statements are based on the Partnership’s current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect on the Partnership.  Although management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable when made, there can be no assurance that future developments affecting the Partnership will be those that it anticipates.  The forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties (some of which are beyond the Partnership’s control) and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Partnership’s historical experience and its present expectations or projections.  Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) the amount of products that the Partnership is able to produce, which could be adversely affected by, among other things, operating difficulties; (ii) the volume of products that the Partnership is able to sell; (iii) the price at which the Partnership is able to sell products; (iv) changes in the price and availability of natural gas, coal, or other sources of energy; (v) changes in prevailing economic conditions; (vi) the Partnership’s ability to complete acquisitions, including acquisitions from its sponsor; (vii) unanticipated ground, grade, or water conditions; (viii) inclement or hazardous weather conditions, including extreme precipitation, temperatures, and flooding; (ix) environmental hazards; (x) fires, explosions, or other accidents; (xi) changes in domestic and foreign laws and regulations (or the interpretation thereof) related to renewable or low-carbon energy, the forestry products industry, or power generators; (xii) inability to acquire or maintain necessary permits; (xiii) inability to obtain necessary production equipment or replacement parts; (xiv) technical difficulties or failures; (xv) labor disputes; (xvi) late delivery of raw materials; (xvii) inability of the Partnership’s customers to take delivery or their rejection of delivery of products; (xviii) failure of the Partnership’s customers to pay or perform their contractual obligations to the Partnership; (xix) changes in the price and availability of transportation; and (xx) the Partnership’s ability to borrow funds and access capital markets.

For additional information regarding known material factors that could cause the Partnership’s actual results to differ from projected results, please read its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the prospectus filed on April 29, 2015 in connection with the IPO and the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015.  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date thereof.  The Partnership undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

9

Financial Statements

ENVIVA PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)

10

ENVIVA PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)

11

ENVIVA PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

12

ENVIVA PARTNERS, LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

Investor Contact:

Raymond Kaszuba
(240) 482-3856
ir@envivapartners.com

13