As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2015

Registration No. 333-203853

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

AMENDMENT NO. 5
TO
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

xG Technology, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware		519100		20-585-6795
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

George Schmitt
xG Technology, Inc.
240 S. Pineapple Avenue, Suite 701
Sarasota, FL 34236
(941) 953-9035

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

The Company Corporation
2711 Centerville Road
Wilmington, DE 19808
(800) 474-8135

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)

 

Copy to:

David E. Danovitch, Esq. Zachary Blumenthal, Esq. Nakia M. Elliott, Esq. Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck P.C. 875 Third Avenue — 9th Floor New York, New York 10022 (212) 603-6300		Christopher M. Forrester, Esq. Shearman & Sterling LLP 1460 El Camino Real, 2nd Floor Menlo Park, California 94025 Tel: (650) 838-3772 Fax: (650) 838-5173

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. x

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large Accelerated Filer o		Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) o		Smaller Reporting Company x

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered		Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(1)				Amount of Registration Fee(4)
Class A Units, each consisting of one share of common stock, par value $0.00001 per share, and half of a Series A Warrant to purchase one share of common stock		$	1,569,127			$	182.33
Common stock, par value $0.00001 per share, underlying the Class A Units(2)(3)		$	—			$	—
Series A Warrants to purchase common stock, underlying the Class A Units(3)		$	—			$	—
Common stock underlying Series A Warrants(2)		$	784,564			$	91.17
Class B Units, each consisting of one pre-funded Series B Warrant to purchase one share of common stock and half of a Series A Warrant to purchase one share of common stock		$	2,748,615			$	319.39
Pre-funded Series B Warrants to purchase common stock underlying the Class B Units(3)		$	—			$	—
Series A Warrants to purchase common stock underlying the Class B Units(3)		$	—			$	—
Common stock underlying the pre-funded Series B Warrants(2)(3)		$	—			$	—
Common stock underlying the Series A Warrants(2)		$	1,374,308			$	159.69
Series C Warrants to purchase additional Class A Units(3)		$	—			$	—
Class A Units underlying Series C Warrants, each consisting of one share of common stock and half of a Series A Warrant to purchase one share of common stock		$	2,353,691			$	273.50
Common stock, par value $0.00001 per share, underlying the Class A Units(2)(3)		$	—			$	—
Series A Warrants to purchase common stock, underlying the Class A Units(3)		$	—			$	—
Common stock underlying Series A Warrants(2)		$	1,176,845			$	136.75
Series D Warrants to purchase additional Class B Units(3)		$	—			$	—
Class B Units underlying Series D Warrants, each consisting of one pre-funded Series B Warrant to purchase one share of common stock and half of a Series A Warrant to purchase one share of common stock		$	4,122,923			$	479.08
Pre-funded Series B Warrants to purchase common stock underlying the Class B Units(3)		$	—			$	—
Series A Warrants to purchase common stock underlying the Class B Units(3)		$	—			$	—
Common stock underlying the pre-funded Series B Warrants(2)(3)		$	—			$	—
Common stock underlying the Series A Warrants(2)		$	2,061,461			$	239.54
TOTAL		$	16,191,534			$	1,881.46

The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with section 8(A) of the Securities Act or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said section 8(A), may determine.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS		SUBJECT TO COMPLETION		DATED AUGUST 13, 2015

1,012,340 Class A Units, Each Consisting of One Share of Common Stock and
0.5 of a Series A Warrant to Purchase One Share of Common Stock
and
1,773,300 Class B Units, Each Consisting of One Pre-funded Series B Warrant to
Purchase One Share of Common Stock and 0.5 of a Series A
Warrant to Purchase One Share of Common Stock
and
1,518,510 Series C Warrants, Each to Purchase One Class A Unit
and
2,659,950 Series D Warrants, Each to Purchase One Class B Unit

We are offering up to 1,012,340 Class A Units (the “Class A Units”), each Class A Unit consisting of one share of our common stock and 0.5 of a Series A Warrant (the “Series A Warrants”) to purchase one share of our common stock. The Class A Units are being offered at an assumed offering price of $1.55 per Class A Unit, the closing trading price of our common stock on August 11, 2015.

We are also offering to those purchasers whose purchase of Class A Units in this offering would result in their beneficial ownership, together with their affiliates and certain related parties, of more than 9.99% of our outstanding common stock following the consummation of this offering, the opportunity to purchase, in lieu of Class A Units that would result in such ownership of more than 9.99%, up to 1,773,300 Class B Units (the “Class B Units”), with each Class B Unit consisting of one pre-funded Series B Warrant to purchase one share of our common stock (the “Pre-funded Series B Warrants”) and 0.5 of a Series A Warrant. The purchase price for each Class B Unit would equal the per unit public offering price for the Class A Units in this offering less the $0.01 per share exercise price of the Pre-funded Series B Warrant included in the Class B Unit.

We are also offering up to 1,518,510 Series C Warrants (the “Series C Warrants”), each to purchase one additional Class A Unit, and up to 2,659,950 Series D Warrants (the “Series D Warrants”, and together with the Series A Warrants, Pre-funded Series B Warrants and Series C Warrants, the “Offering Warrants”), each to purchase one additional Class B Unit. The Series C Warrants are being offered at a price of $0.01 per Series C Warrant. The Series D Warrants are being offered at a price of $0.01 per Series D Warrant.

The Class A Units and Class B Units will not be issued or certificated. Purchasers will receive only shares of common stock, Series A Warrants, Pre-funded Series B Warrants, Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants. The common stock, the Series A Warrants, the Pre-funded Series B Warrants, the Series C Warrants and the Series D Warrants may be transferred separately immediately upon issuance.

Each Series A Warrant will be immediately exercisable at an initial exercise price of $1.55 per share (100% of the public offering price of the Class A Units). The Series A Warrants will expire on the fifth anniversary of the initial date of issuance.

Each Pre-funded Series B Warrant will be immediately exercisable at an initial exercise price of $0.01 per share. The Pre-funded Series B Warrants will expire on the fifth anniversary of the initial date of issuance. Pre-funded Series B Warrants that expire unexercised will have no further value and the holder of such warrant will lose the pre-funded amount.

Each Series C Warrant is exercisable for one additional Class A Unit, each of which consists of one share of our common stock and 0.5 of a Series A Warrant to purchase one share of our common stock. The Series C Warrants are exercisable immediately at an initial exercise price of $1.55 per Class A Unit (100% of the public offering price of the Class A Units), subject to adjustment. Beginning at the close of trading on the 60^th trading day following the date of issuance, and effective beginning on the third (3^rd) trading day immediately preceding such 60^th trading day, the Series C Warrants will be exercisable at a per Class A Unit exercise price equal to the lowest of (i) the then-effective exercise price per Class A Unit, (ii) 80% of the closing price of our common stock on such 60^th trading day and (iii) 80% of the average of the volume weighted average price of our common stock (“VWAP”) for the three (3) trading days ending and including the 60^th trading day following the date of issuance. The Series C Warrants will expire at the close of business at 5:00 p.m. (New York time) on the 65^th trading day following the date of issuance.

Each Series D Warrant is exercisable for one additional Class B Unit, each of which consists of one Pre-funded Series B Warrant to purchase one share of our common stock and 0.5 of a Series A Warrant to purchase one share of our common stock. The Series D Warrants are exercisable immediately at an initial exercise price of $1.54 per Class B Unit (100% of the public offering price of the Class B Units), subject to adjustment. Beginning at the close of trading on the 60^th trading day following the date of issuance, and effective beginning on the third (3^rd) trading day immediately preceding such 60 ^th trading day, the Series D Warrants will be exercisable at a per Class B Unit exercise price equal to the lowest of (i) the then-effective exercise price per Class B Unit, (ii) 80% of the closing price of our common stock on such 60^th trading day and (iii) 80% of the average of the VWAP for the three (3) trading days ending and including the 60^th trading day following the date of issuance. The Series D Warrants will expire at the close of business at 5:00 p.m. (New York time) on the 65^th trading day following the date of issuance.

Our common stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “XGTI”. The closing price of our shares of common stock on NASDAQ on August 11, 2015 was $1.55 per share. On July 17, 2015, we effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock.

There is no established trading market for the Offering Warrants, and we do not expect an active trading market to develop. We do not intend to list the Offering Warrants on any securities exchange or other trading market. Without an active trading market, the liquidity of the Offering Warrants will be limited.

We are an “emerging growth company” as the term is used in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”) and, as such, have elected to comply with certain reduced public company reporting requirements for this and future filings.

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 14 of this prospectus for a discussion that should be considered in connection with an investment in our securities.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if the prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Per Class A Unit

Per Class B Unit

Per Series C Warrant

Per Series D Warrant

Total

Public offering price

Underwriting discounts and commissions(1)

$

$

—

—

$

Proceeds to us, before expenses

The underwriter expects to deliver our securities to purchasers in the offering on or about            , 2015.

Roth Capital Partners

The date of this prospectus is            , 2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Prospectus Summary			1
Summary Financial Data			11
Risk Factors			14
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements			32
Use of Proceeds			33
Market Price Information for Our Securities			34
Capitalization			35
Dilution			36
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			38
Business			49
Management			69
Executive Compensation			76
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management			80
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions			82
Description of Securities			85
Shares Eligible for Future Sale			93
Underwriting			95
Legal Matters			101
Experts			101
Where You Can More Additional Information			102
Index to Financial Statements			F-1
Glossary			G-1

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. Neither we nor the underwriter have authorized anyone to provide you with information that is additional or different. Neither we nor the underwriter are making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where an offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus only. Our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations may have changed since that date.

Information contained in, and that can be accessed through, our web site, www.xgtechnology.com, does not constitute part of this prospectus.

The xG logo is a trademark of xG Technology, Inc. All other trademarks and service marks appearing in this prospectus are the property of their respective holders.

This prospectus includes market and industry data that has been obtained from third party sources, including industry publications, as well as industry data prepared by our management on the basis of its knowledge of and experience in the industries in which we operate (including our management’s estimates and assumptions relating to such industries based on that knowledge). Management’s knowledge of such industries has been developed through its experience and participation in these industries. While our management believes the third-party sources referred to in this prospectus are reliable, neither we nor our management have independently verified any of the data from such sources referred to in this prospectus or ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon by such sources. Internally prepared and third party market forecasts, in particular, are estimates only and may be inaccurate, especially over long periods of time. In addition, the underwriter has not independently verified any of the industry data prepared by management or ascertained the underlying estimates and assumptions relied upon by management. Furthermore, references in this prospectus to any publications, reports, surveys or articles prepared by third parties should not be construed as depicting the complete findings of the entire publication, report, survey or article. The information in any such publication, report, survey or article is not incorporated by reference in this prospectus.

Until              , 2015 (25 days after the commencement of the offering) all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers’ obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information contained in greater detail elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all the information you should consider before investing in our common stock. You should read the entire prospectus carefully before making an investment decision, especially “Risk Factors” and the financial statements and the related notes. Unless the context provides otherwise, all references herein to “xG”, “xG Technology”, the “Company”, “we”, “our” and “us” refer to xG Technology, Inc. For definitions of certain industry terms used throughout this prospectus, please see “Glossary”.

All share and per share amounts in this prospectus give retroactive effect to the 1-for-10 reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) that became effective on July 17, 2015.

Our Company

We have developed a broad portfolio of innovative intellectual property to enhance wireless communications. Our intellectual property is embedded in proprietary software algorithms that offer cognitive interference mitigation and spectrum access solutions for countless applications using commercial off the shelf devices. We recently released the commercially available version of our software and hardware products using our proprietary xMax® cognitive radio technology.

Our current cognitive radio technology is based on years of product development. In 2008 and 2009, we generated material revenues from sales of our prior BSN250 voice-only products. After the introduction of various smartphones in 2007 and later that could handle both voice and data, we decided to enhance our voice-only products to include data services. In 2011, we delivered our enhanced BSN250 base station and TX70 handset for both voice and SMS services to the U.S. Army. Given the proliferation of smartphones, the U.S. Army subsequently requested that our BSN250 base station should integrate with commercial off the shelf devices. In 2013, we introduced an improved product line that could handle both voice and data services. These new products, the Access Point (“CN1100”), formerly known as the xAP base station, the Mobile Hotspot (“CN5100”), formerly known as the xMod modem, and the Vehicle Modem (“CN3100”), formerly known as the xVM modem, are able to communicate with any wi-fi enabled commercial off the shelf device. In 2014, we began developing a new product, the CN3200 Dual Band Routing Modem (“CN3200”), formerly known as the xRM modem. On September 30, 2014, we received certification from the U.S. Federal Communications Commission in connection with the CN3200. The CN3200 is a module that complements the xMax mobile system and is designed to provide high speed fixed broadband access using frequencies at 2.4 GHz. It offers an end-user solution that seamlessly integrates xMax and wi-fi in a single device, and allows the delivery of both high data rates and reliable high-speed mobility in the same system. We believe that the CN3200 will provide higher performance with dedicated channels for voice (xMax) and data (wi-fi), will maximize user experience via interprotocol smart-routing, and provide greater reliability.

We believe that the wireless communications industry is facing a “spectrum crisis” because the demand for flexible, affordable voice and data access continues to increase rapidly while the amount of available spectrum remains relatively constant. We have developed frequency-agnostic cognitive radio solutions to address this increasing demand by eliminating the need to acquire scarce and expensive licensed radio spectrum, and thus ideally lowering the total cost of ownership for wireless broadband access. With fast-growing demand straining network capacity, our intellectual property is also designed to help wireless broadband network operators make more efficient use of their existing spectrum allocations. We are targeting sales in numerous industries worldwide, such as telecommunications services, public safety and defense, and in markets ranging from rural to urban areas as well as expeditionary deployments.

The initial implementation of our cognitive radio intellectual property is xMax. We believe the xMax system is the only commercially available cognitive radio network system that includes our interference mitigation and spatial processing technologies. xMax implements our proprietary interference mitigation software that can increase capacity on already crowded airwaves by improving interference tolerance, enabling the delivery of higher QoS than other technologies that would not be able to cope with the interference. We believe that the xMax system will also, when operating on more than one radio channel, deliver dynamic spectrum access by using our patented self-organizing network techniques. Furthermore, the xMax system can be used to provide additional capacity to licensed spectrum by identifying and utilizing unused bandwidth within the licensed spectrum.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our system is frequency agnostic, although currently designed to operate within the 902 – 928 MHz unlicensed band of spectrum. xMax serves as a mobile VoIP and broadband data system that utilizes an end-to-end IP system architecture. The xMax product and service suite includes access points, mobile switching centers, network management systems, deployment tools and proactive customer support. The xMax system will allow mobile operators to utilize free, unlicensed 902 – 928 MHz ISM band spectrum (which spectrum is available in all of the Americas except French Guiana) instead of purchasing scarce and expensive licensed spectrum. Our xMax system will also enable enterprises to set up a mobile communications network in an expeditious and cost-effective manner.

We have generated significant net losses for the past several years and we expect to continue to realize net losses for the immediate future.

We are executing on our sales and marketing strategy and have entered into direct sales agreements with end-customers and indirect sales agreements with channel network partners. These customer engagements are primarily in two of our target markets: public safety and rural telecommunications.

Our Strengths

We believe the following strengths position us for sustainable growth:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Strategy

We are developing a broad portfolio of innovative intellectual property that we believe will enhance wireless communications. Leveraging elements of this intellectual property portfolio, we plan to introduce a range of spectrum agnostic, cognitive radio solutions for numerous industries and applications. We believe that sales of these products and services, together with our ability to leverage our patent portfolio, present us with an attractive revenue model. Our current strategy is to commercialize our intellectual property portfolio by developing and selling network products using our proprietary software algorithms to offer cognitive interference mitigation and spectrum access solutions. Our future strategies are for our intellectual property to be embedded by partners in a semiconductor chip that could be sold to third-party equipment manufacturers and inserted in their devices, and to license our intellectual property to other customers in industry verticals world-wide.

Recent Developments

Bridge Loans

On June 11, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with a group of accredited investors pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of $1,166,666 in principal amount of 8% Original Issue Discount Convertible Notes due December 11, 2015 (the “8% Convertible Notes”) for an aggregate purchase price of $1,050,000. The Company received net proceeds of $907,500 from the sale of the 8% Convertible Notes after deducting placement agent fees and other expenses.

On July 14, 2015, the Company issued an additional tranche of $466,667 in principal amount of 8% Convertible Notes for an aggregate purchase price of $420,000. The Company received net proceeds of $400,000 from the sale of the additional tranche of 8% Convertible Notes after deducting placement agent fees and other expenses.

Short-Term Loan

From April 1, 2015 to August 11, 2015, the Company received a total of $1,010,000 from George Schmitt, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The amount was recorded due to related parties.

Company Announcements

On July 17, 2015, we effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock.

On July 16, 2015, we filed an S-8 Registration Statement to register 100,000 shares of common stock under the 2015 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, at an offering price of $2.66 per share.

In July 2015, we announced we received an order for approximately $309,000 for xMax mobile broadband wireless equipment and services which will be integrated into a dedicated Telemedicine/Telehealth Systems Network Infrastructure. The initial network — Phase 1 — will be built out in St. George’s, the capital of Grenada, with a Network Operations Center (NOC) capable of supporting regional expansion and growth throughput CARICOM, the community of 15 nations and dependencies located in the Caribbean. The xMax equipment order was received from Telemedicine MM Systems-New York (“Telemedisys”), an integrator of healthcare and other network systems. Telmedisys plans to integrate the xMax mobile broadband communications platform into its network infrastructure to deliver telemedicine/telehealth, emergency response services, disaster recovery and other applications at an affordable cost. The integration of xMax broadband wireless networking equipment into the network infrastructure will facilitate the desired turnkey-design effect.

In June 2015, we announced we successfully demonstrated our interference mitigation capabilities against sustained electronic attacks (jamming) at the U.S. Special Operations Command’s (“USSOCOM”) Technical Experimentation Event 15-3 conducted June 14 to June 18 at the Muscatatuck Urban Training Center (“MUTC”) in Indiana. During a three day exercise, a tactical xMax network was deployed to provide real-time video, position location and integrated tactical radio communications from vehicles operating in diverse terrain throughout the MUTC. Sustained electronic attacks from military-grade jammers were introduced but were unable to disrupt the performance of the xMax network. xG was selected to participate as a technology developer at the event because of the unique capabilities that the xMax cognitive software-defined radio platform brings to tactical and expeditionary operations. xMax was the only communication system on display

TABLE OF CONTENTS

at the event that met the USSOCOM requirement for innovative and advanced software-defined radio technologies that will enable secure and interference-resistant communications for Special Operations Forces (“SOF”).

In May 2015, we announced we received an order for approximately $100,000 in xMax mobile broadband wireless equipment and services which will be deployed in a network to be initially installed in Escazu, Costa Rica, with plans to expand in other Latin American locations. The xMax equipment order was received from Itellum, LLC (“Itellum”), a related party, one of four companies who have entered into a formal agreement to participate in the initial xMax deployment as well as expansion into other Latin American markets thereafter. The other partners include Level 3 Communications (“Level 3”), Osmin Vargas Corporacion (“OV”), and MB Technology Holdings, LLC (“MBTH”), a related party. The xMax broadband wireless networking equipment will include compact, high-performance access points, fixed and mobile personal WiFi hotspot devices and mobile control switching centers. In June 2015, we announced the successful installation and initial deployment of an xMax broadband network in Escazu, Costa Rica by Itellum. This represents the first stage of xMax network deployments that are expected to cover additional areas of Costa Rica, with plans for expansion into other Latin American locations. In June 2015, we announced that we received an additional order for approximately $58,000 in xMax mobile broadband wireless equipment and services from Itellum.

In May 2015, we announced that we were awarded a new patent covering enhanced techniques for mitigating interference in wireless transmissions. The new patent, “Hybrid ARQ System with Snapshot Feedback Mechanism for Interference Prone Wireless Networks,” outlines a method for faster and more detailed analysis of data being received, which will help deliver smoother and more reliable communications in crowded and challenged RF (radio frequency) environments. Impairments in wireless channels can cause data corruption and loss, and adversely impact system throughput. The presence of interference, both intentionally and non-intentionally generated, exacerbates this problem and further degrades performance. This is a growing occurrence in public cellular systems that can be weighed down (and even become unavailable) when there is a large concentration of users during a crisis or other event.

In May 2015, we also announced a Strategic Technology Alliance Agreement with Drakontas, LLC (“Drakontas”) to cooperate in the marketing of each other’s respective solutions. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company and Drakontas will make available integrated products that include xMax private mobile broadband network technology and Drakontas’ DragonForce mobile team collaboration software application. Built for tactical teams and for everyday law enforcement operations, DragonForce empowers public safety teams to effectively share information in real-time in the field through instant messaging, location, personnel tracking, photo and document sharing and collaborative whiteboards.

In May 2015, we announced that we were awarded a new patent for a method of adding enhanced intelligence to a comprehensive cognitive radio-based solution for mitigating interference in wireless systems. This represents the second patent awarded to the Company this year for improved interference mitigation techniques. The new patent, “Interference Rejection Method Based on Multiple Sub-Band Projections,” adds a novel approach to dealing with interference that allows wireless systems to maintain high levels of performance, even in difficult transmission environments. This innovation has a direct benefit in markets that require reliable, high-quality communications in unpredictable situations, such as public safety, emergency management and the military sector.

In May 2015, we announced a Strategic Technology Alliance Agreement with Radio IP Software, Inc. (“Radio IP”) to co-market each other’s respective solutions. Under the terms of the agreement, xG and Radio IP will make available integrated products that include xMax private mobile broadband network technology and Radio IP’s mobile virtual private network (MVPN) solution. The Radio IP solution improves wireless data communications on mission-critical mobile networks by providing application session persistence, FIPS140-2 compliance for all applications running over MVPNs, and roaming to almost all public and private networks available (including LANs, hotspots, carrier and private radio).

In May 2015, we announced that our xMax private wireless broadband system will be FirstNet-ready, having demonstrated interoperability with the commercial LTE cellular network. FirstNet is the planned U.S. nationwide broadband high-speed network that will be reserved for use by the first responder community,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and having a solution which is LTE-capable is a key requirement for using this network. With LTE capability included in the xMax system, these authorities can update their infrastructure by deploying the xMax wireless broadband system in their area to meet mission-essential needs today, with confidence that it will meet their FirstNet needs in the future.

In April 2015, we announced that we successfully completed the installation and deployment of a three-site pilot xMax broadband wireless network for the Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications Systems Authority (“BayRICS”). The deployment covers parts of the San Francisco Bay Area municipalities of Livermore, Dublin and Pleasanton. The xMax solution is currently being evaluated by San Francisco Bay Area emergency management organizations. Since the original announcement of the BayRICS deployment on December 18, 2014, dozens of extensive demonstrations have been granted to California public safety stakeholders interested in experiencing the features of the xMax network in a live setting. As a result of these demonstrations, xMax is under consideration for purchase and deployment as a public safety broadband wireless solution by area municipal and emergency operations officials. The pilot network covers approximately 60 square miles and is comprised of xMax networking equipment that includes compact access points and subscriber devices installed in both stationary locations as well as in specially-equipped vehicles to showcase on-the-move support.

In April 2015, we also announced that we achieved increased performance in the patented and market-leading interference mitigation capabilities of the xMax private mobile broadband wireless system. The heightened performance is the result of successfully incorporating more complex and robust signal processing algorithms and other advances spearheaded by xG’s research and development team. These technological advancements translate to up to a ten-fold improvement in the ability of xMax to withstand interference.

In addition, in April 2015, we announced an agreement with DirectView Holdings, Inc. to integrate our xMax private mobile broadband technology with DirectView’s recently announced body-worn camera scheduled for commercial launch early in the third quarter of 2015. The planned integration will consolidate the private, secure, high-performance communications capabilities of xMax with the advanced features and functionality of DirectView’s body-worn camera. In June 2015, we announced that we have begun beta testing of DirectView’s innovative body-worn camera solution for law enforcement agencies.

Conversions and Balances of Outstanding Series B Preferred Stock

As of August 11, 2015, 1,195,000 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock and 83,650 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock issued as dividends have been converted into 405,499 shares of our common stock. As of August 11, 2015, all outstanding shares of the Series B Preferred Stock have been fully converted.

Conversions and Balance of Outstanding Series C Preferred Stock

As of August 11, 2015, 1,800,000 shares of the Series C Preferred Stock and 126,000 shares of the Series C Preferred Stock issued as dividends have been converted into 946,518 shares of our common stock. As of August 11, 2015, all outstanding shares of the Series C Preferred Stock have been fully converted.

Recent Operating Results (preliminary and unaudited)

We are currently in the process of finalizing our financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. Based on preliminary unaudited information and management estimates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, and subject to the completion of our financial closing procedures:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Revenues

The expected increase in revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 resulted from sales of equipment to multiple customers during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.

Net Loss

The expected decrease in net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 of $0.5 million and $2.2 million, respectively, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 is due mainly to a decrease in development expenses.

Risks That We Face

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks summarized below. The risks are discussed more fully in the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus immediately following this prospectus summary.

These risks include, but are not limited to:

Company Information

The Company was organized as a limited liability company under the laws of the State of Delaware on August 26, 2002 under the name JTS Acquisitions, LLC. On March 21, 2003, we changed our name to xG Technology, LLC. Pursuant to a certificate of conversion and a certificate of incorporation filed with the State of Delaware on November 8, 2006, xG Technology, LLC converted to a Delaware corporation under the name xG Technology, Inc.

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. We could remain an emerging growth company for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenue exceeds $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period. Pursuant to Section 102 of the JOBS Act, we have provided reduced executive compensation disclosure and have omitted a compensation discussion and analysis from this prospectus. Pursuant to Section 107 of the JOBS Act, we have elected to utilize the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE OFFERING

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The number of shares of our common stock to be issued and outstanding after this offering is based on 5,128,883 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of August 11, 2015, which number excludes:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus assumes a public offering price of $1.55 per Class A Unit and $1.55 per Class B Unit (including and assuming the exercise of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants underlying the Class B Units).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents a summary of certain historical financial information. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results and you should read the following summary financial data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary financial data for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were derived from our audited financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary financial data for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were derived from unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary financial data in this section are not intended to replace the financial statements and are qualified in their entirety by the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

xG TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2015 AND DECEMBER 31, 2014
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
Unaudited

		March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash		$	221			$	758
Cash, restricted			600				—
Inventory, net			3,758				4,070
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $30 and $30 ($335 and $480 from related party)			557				702
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			336				411
Total current assets			5,472				5,941
Property and equipment, net			882				816
Intangible assets, net			16,111				16,382
Total assets		$	22,465			$	23,139
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable		$	1,393			$	868
Accrued expenses			731				511
Accrued interest			87				42
Deferred revenue			50				—
Due to related parties			264				2,110
Deferred revenue – related party			—				480
Obligation under capital lease			135				123
Derivative liabilities			520				270
Total current liabilities			3,180				4,404
Long-term obligation under capital lease			83				—
Convertible note payable			2,000				2,000
Total liabilities			5,263				6,404

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
Commitments and contingencies
Series A convertible preferred stock – $0.00001 par value per share: 3,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014; 0 and 750,000 issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (liquidation preference of $0 at March 31, 2015 and $750,100 at December 31, 2014)		$	—			$	378
Series B convertible preferred stock – $0.00001 par value per share: 3,000,000 and 0 shares authorized at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014; 250,000 and 0 issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (liquidation preference of $252,300 at March 31, 2015)			104				—
Series C convertible preferred stock – $0.00001 par value per share: 3,000,000 and 0 shares authorized at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014; 1,589,720 and 0 issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (liquidation preference of $1,600,391 at March 31, 2015)			895				—
Total convertible preferred stock			999				378
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Preferred stock – $0.00001 par value per share: 1,000,000 and 7,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014; none issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014			—				—
Common stock, – $0.00001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 3,641,914 and 2,617,622 shares issued as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively			—*				—*
Additional paid in capital			190,302				186,919
Accumulated deficit			(174,077	)			(170,540	)
Treasury stock, at cost – 229 shares at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively			(22	)			(22	)
Total stockholders’ equity			16,203				16,357
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity		$	22,465			$	23,139

xG TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT NET LOSS PER SHARE DATA)
Unaudited

		For the Three Months Ended March 31,
		2015				2014
Revenue		$	584			$	250
Cost of revenue and operating expenses
Cost of components and personnel			330				63
General and administrative expenses			1,586				1,679
Development			1,550				2,453
Stock based compensation			133				214
Amortization and depreciation			960				948
Total cost of revenue and operating expenses			4,559				5,357
Loss from operations			(3,975	)			(5,107)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		For the Three Months Ended March 31,
		2015				2014
Other income (expense)
Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities		$	485			$	—
Interest expense, net			(47	)			(46	)
Total other income (expense)			438				(46	)
Loss before income tax provision			(3,537	)			(5,153	)
Income tax provision			—				—
Net loss		$	(3,537	)		$	(5,153	)
Dividends and deemed dividends			1,070				—
Net loss attributable to common shareholders			(4,607	)			(5,153	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share		$	(1.54	)		$	(2.75	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding basic and diluted			2,998				1,876

xG TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

		For the Year Ended December 31,
		2014				2013
Revenue		$	628			$	406
Cost of revenue and operating expenses
Cost of components and personnel			156				102
General and administrative expenses			7,618				5,501
Development			7,597				5,468
Stock based compensation			625				796
Amortization and depreciation			3,871				2,370
Total cost of revenue and operating expenses			19,867				14,237
Loss from operations			(19,239	)			(13,831	)
Other income (expense)
Other income			440				—
Other expense			—				(10,068	)
Inducement expense			—				(391	)
Interest expense, net			(179	)			(2,227	)
Impairment			—				(933	)
Total other income (expense)			261				(13,619	)
Loss before income tax provision			(18,978	)			(27,450	)
Income tax provision			—				—
Net loss		$	(18,978	)		$	(27,450	)
Dividends			—*				—
Net loss attributable to common shareholders			(18,978	)			(27,450	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share			(8.31	)			(28.59	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding basic and diluted			2,285				960

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RISK FACTORS

Our business faces many risks and an investment in our common stock involves significant risks. Prospective investors are strongly encouraged to consider carefully the risks described below, as well as other information contained herein, before investing. Investors are further advised that the risks described below may not be the only risks we face. Additional risks that we do not yet know of, or that we currently think are immaterial, may also negatively impact our business operations or financial results. If any of the events or circumstances described in this section occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer. Prospective investors in our common stock should consider the following risks before deciding whether to purchase shares.

Risks Related to the Company and Our Business

We have a history of operating losses and we expect to continue to realize net losses for at least the next 12 months.

We have recorded a net loss in each reporting period since our inception. Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the three months ended March 31, 2015 was approximately $18,978,000 and $3,537,000, respectively. Our accumulated deficit at March 31, 2015, was approximately $174,077,000. The Company began its research and development activities in 2002, and has had significant net losses and will likely continue to incur net losses until we can successfully commercialize our products and technology. Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt concerning our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional capital, obtain other financing and/or close on our potential revenue producing opportunities. The Company expects to continue to have development costs as it develops the next generation of products. In addition, at this stage of our development we are subject to the following risks:

We are uncertain of our ability to continue as a going concern, indicating the possibility that we may not be able to operate in the future.

The audit opinion and notes that accompany our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, disclose a ‘going concern’ qualification to our ability to continue in business. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. We do not have sufficient cash to fund normal operations and meet debt obligations for the next 12 months without raising additional funds. We currently have no historical recurring source of revenue and our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to raise capital to fund our working capital requirements or our ability to profitably execute our business plan. It is not possible for us to predict at this time the potential success of our business. The revenue and income potential of our proposed business and operations are currently unknown. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We may require additional capital in the future to develop new products. If we do not obtain any such additional financing, if required, our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

We may require additional capital in the future to develop new products. We may not be able to secure adequate additional financing when needed on acceptable terms, or at all. To execute our business strategy, we may issue additional equity securities in public or private offerings, potentially at a price lower than the public offering price in this offering or the market price of our common stock at the time of such issuance. If we cannot secure sufficient additional funding we may be forced to forego strategic opportunities or delay, scale back and eliminate future product development.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Defects or errors in our products and services or in products made by our suppliers could harm our brand and relations with our customers and expose us to liability. If we experience product recalls, we may incur significant expenses and experience decreased demand for our products.

Our products are inherently complex and may contain defects and errors that are only detectable when the products are in use. Because our products are used for both personal and business purposes, such defects or errors could have a serious impact on our end customers, which could damage our reputation, harm our customer relationships and expose us to liability. Defects or impurities in our components, materials or software, equipment failures or other difficulties could adversely affect our ability, and that of our customers, to ship products on a timely basis as well as customer or licensee demand for our products. Any such shipment delays or declines in demand could reduce our revenues and harm our ability to achieve or sustain desired levels of profitability. We and our customers may also experience component or software failures or defects that could require significant product recalls, rework and/or repairs that are not covered by warranty reserves.

Our recognition of deferred revenue is subject to future performance obligations and may not be representative of revenues for future periods.

As of March 31, 2015, we had $50,000 of deferred revenue recorded as a liability on our balance sheet. This deferred revenue was recorded based on engineering design and installation services that have yet to be performed on hardware products shipped to companies that are owned or controlled by our former director, Larry Townes. On March 31, 2015, we received a partial payment for the equipment that had been delivered in prior transactions, as the purchasers indicated that the equipment met certain technical specifications associated with their networks. Previously, the purchasers did not intend to deliver payment until such technical specifications were satisfied. As of March 31, 2015, these specifications have now been satisfied and the deferred revenue has been recorded as revenue.

In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), and SEC Staff accounting guidance on revenue recognition, the Company considers revenue earned and realizable when: (a) persuasive evidence of the sales arrangement exists, (b) the arrangement fee is fixed or determinable, (c) service delivery or performance has occurred, (d) customer acceptance has been received, if contractually required, and (e) collectability of the arrangement fee is probable.

Due to potential future changes in customer preferences, or delays in customer development or implementation schedules or budgets, and the need for us to satisfactorily perform product support and other services, deferred revenue and backlog amounts at any particular date may not be representative of actual revenue for any current or future period.

Although certain technical problems experienced by users may not be caused by our products, our business and reputation may be harmed if users perceive our solutions as the cause of a slow or unreliable network connection, or a high profile network failure.

We expect that our products will be in many different locations and user environments and will be capable of providing mobile broadband connectivity and interference mitigation, among other applications. The ability of our products to operate effectively can be negatively impacted by many different elements unrelated to our products. Although certain technical problems experienced by users may not be caused by our products, users often may perceive the underlying cause to be a result of poor performance of our technology. This perception, even if incorrect, could harm our business and reputation. Similarly, a high profile network failure may be caused by improper operation of the network or failure of a network component that we did not supply, but other service providers may perceive that our products were implicated, which, even if incorrect, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our ability to sell our products will be highly dependent on the quality of our support and services offerings, and our failure to offer high-quality support and services would have a material adverse effect on our sales and results of operations.

Once our products are deployed, our channel partners and end-customers will depend on our support organization to resolve any issues relating to our products. A high level of support will be important for the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

successful marketing and sale of our products. In many cases, our channel partners will likely provide support directly to our end-customers. We will not have complete control over the level or quality of support provided by our channel partners. These channel partners may also provide support for other third-party products, which may potentially distract resources from support for our products. If we and our channel partners do not effectively assist our end-customers in deploying our products, succeed in helping our end-customers quickly resolve post-deployment issues or provide effective ongoing support, our ability to sell our products to existing end-customers could be adversely affected and our reputation with potential end-customers could be harmed. In some cases, we guarantee a certain level of performance to our channel partners and end-customers, which could prove to be resource-intensive and expensive for us to fulfill if unforeseen technical problems were to arise.

We may fail to recruit and retain qualified personnel.

We expect to rapidly expand our operations and grow our sales, development and administrative operations. This expansion is expected to place a significant strain on our management and will require hiring a significant number of qualified personnel. Accordingly, recruiting and retaining such personnel in the future will be critical to our success. There is intense competition from other companies for qualified personnel in the areas of our activities. If we fail to identify, attract, retain and motivate these highly skilled personnel, we may be unable to continue our marketing and development activities, and this could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

We rely on key executive officers, and their knowledge of our business and technical expertise would be difficult to replace.

We are highly dependent on our executive officers because of their expertise and experience in the telecommunications industry. We have agreements with our executive officers containing customary non-disclosure, non-compete, confidentiality and assignment of inventions provisions. We do not have “key person” life insurance policies for any of our officers. The loss of the technical knowledge and management and industry expertise of any of our key personnel could result in delays in product development, loss of customers and sales and diversion of management resources, which could adversely affect our operating results.

We and our contract manufacturers purchase some components, subassemblies and products from a limited number of suppliers. The loss of any of these suppliers may substantially disrupt our ability to obtain orders and fulfill sales as we design in and qualify new components.

We rely on third party components and technology to build and operate our products, and we rely on our contract manufacturers to obtain the components, subassemblies and products necessary for the manufacture of our products. Shortages in components that we use in our products are possible, and our ability to predict the availability of such components is limited. While components and supplies are generally available from a variety of sources, we and our contract manufacturers currently depend on a single or limited number of suppliers for several components for our products. If our suppliers of these components or technology were to enter into exclusive relationships with other providers of wireless networking equipment or were to discontinue providing such components and technology to us and we were unable to replace them cost effectively, or at all, our ability to provide our products would be impaired. We and our contract manufacturers generally rely on purchase orders rather than long-term contracts with these suppliers. As a result, even if available, we and our contract manufacturers may not be able to secure sufficient components at reasonable prices or of acceptable quality to build our products in a timely manner. Therefore, we may be unable to meet customer demand for our products, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We do not have long-term contracts with our existing contract manufacturers. The loss of any of our existing contract manufacturers could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We do not have long-term contracts with our existing contract manufacturers. If any of our existing contract manufacturers are unable or unwilling to manufacture our products in the future, the loss of such contract manufacturers could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our intellectual property protections may be insufficient to properly safeguard our technology.

Our success and ability to compete effectively are, in large part, dependent upon proprietary technology that we have developed internally. Given the rapid pace of innovation and technological change within the wireless and broadband industries, the technological and creative skill of our personnel, consultants and contractors and their ability to develop, enhance and market new products and upgrades to existing products are critical to our continued success. We rely primarily on patent laws to protect our proprietary rights. As of August 11, 2015, in the United States, we have 54 patents granted, 4 patent applications pending and 1 provisional application pending. Internationally, we have 59 patents granted and 47 patent applications pending. There can be no assurance that patents pending or future patent applications will be issued, or that if issued, we would have the resources to protect any such issued patent from infringement. Further, we cannot patent much of the technology that is important to our business. To date, we have relied on copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures, non-compete and/or work for hire invention assignment agreements and licensing arrangements with our employees, consultants, contractors, customers and vendors, to establish and protect our rights to this technology and, to the best extent possible, control the access to and distribution of our technology, software, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use this technology without authorization. Policing unauthorized use of this technology is difficult. There can be no assurance that the steps we take or will take will prevent misappropriation of, or prevent an unauthorized third party from obtaining or using, the technology we rely on. In addition, effective protection may be unavailable or limited in some jurisdictions. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce or protect our rights.

We may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement or invalidity. Expenses incurred with respect to monitoring, protecting, and defending our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business.

Competitors and others may infringe on our intellectual property rights, or may allege that we have infringed on theirs. Monitoring infringement and misappropriation of intellectual property can be difficult and expensive, and we may not be able to detect infringement or misappropriation of our proprietary rights. We may also incur significant litigation expenses in protecting our intellectual property or defending our use of intellectual property, reducing our ability to fund product initiatives. These expenses could have an adverse effect on our future cash flows and results of operations. If we are found to infringe on the rights of others we could be required to discontinue offering certain products or systems, to pay damages, or purchase a license to use the intellectual property in question from its owner. Litigation can also distract management from the day-to-day operations of the business.

Enforcement of our intellectual property rights abroad, particularly in China, is limited and it is often difficult to protect and enforce such rights.

Patent protection outside the United States is generally not as comprehensive as in the United States and may not protect our intellectual property in some countries where our products are sold or may be sold in the future. Even if patents are granted outside the United States, effective enforcement in those countries may not be available. Many companies have encountered substantial intellectual property infringement in countries where we sell, or intend to sell, products or have our products manufactured.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In particular, the legal regime relating to intellectual property rights in China is limited and it is often difficult to protect and enforce such rights. The regulatory scheme for enforcing China’s intellectual property laws may not be as developed as regulatory schemes in other countries. Any advancement of an intellectual property enforcement claim through China’s regulatory scheme may require an extensive amount of time, allowing intellectual property infringers to continue largely unimpeded, to our commercial detriment in the Chinese and other export markets. In addition, rules of evidence may be unclear, inconsistent or difficult to comply with, making it difficult to prove infringement of our intellectual property rights. As a result, enforcement cases involving technology, such as copyright infringement of software code, or unauthorized manufacture or sale of products containing patented inventions, may be difficult or not possible to sustain.

These factors may make it increasingly complicated for us to enforce our intellectual property rights against parties misappropriating or copying our technology or products without our authorization, allowing competing enterprises to harm our business in the Chinese or other export markets by affecting the pricing for our products, reducing our own sales and diluting our brand or product quality reputation.

The intellectual property rights of others may prevent us from developing new products or entering new markets.

The telecommunications industry is characterized by the rapid development of new technologies, which requires us to continuously introduce new products and expand into new markets that may be created. Therefore, our success depends in part on our ability to continually adapt our products and systems to incorporate new technologies and to expand into markets that may be created by new technologies. If technologies are protected by the intellectual property rights of others, including our competitors, we may be prevented from introducing new products or expanding into new markets created by these technologies. If the intellectual property rights of others prevent us from taking advantage of innovative technologies, our financial condition, operating results or prospects may be harmed.

We rely on the availability of third-party licenses. If these licenses are available to us only on less favorable terms or not at all in the future, our business and operating results would be harmed.

We have incorporated third-party licensed technology into our products. It may be necessary in the future to renew licenses relating to various aspects of these products or to seek additional licenses for existing or new products. There can be no assurance that the necessary licenses will be available on acceptable terms or at all. The inability to obtain certain licenses or other rights, or to obtain those licenses or rights on favorable terms, or the need to engage in litigation regarding these matters, could result in delays in product releases until such time, if ever, as equivalent technology could be identified, licensed or developed and integrated into our products and might have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Moreover, the inclusion in our products of intellectual property licensed from third parties on a nonexclusive basis could limit our ability to protect our proprietary rights in our products.

Our customers could also become the target of litigation relating to the patent and other intellectual property rights of others.

Any litigation relating to the intellectual property rights of others could trigger technical support and indemnification obligations in licenses or customer agreements that we may enter into. These obligations could result in substantial expenses, including the payment by us of costs and damages relating to claims of intellectual property infringement. In addition to the time and expense required for us to provide support or indemnification to our customers, any such litigation could disrupt the businesses of our customers, which in turn could hurt our relationships with such customers and cause the sale of our products to decrease. No assurance can be given that claims for indemnification will not be made, or that if made, such claims would not have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial conditions.

We expect to base our inventory purchasing decisions on our forecasts of customers’ demand, and if our forecasts are inaccurate, our operating results could be materially harmed.

As our customer base increases, we expect to place orders with our contract manufacturers based on our forecasts of our customers’ demand. Our forecasts will be based on multiple assumptions, each of which may cause our estimates to be inaccurate, affecting our ability to provide products to our customers. When demand

TABLE OF CONTENTS

for our products increases significantly, we may not be able to meet demand on a timely basis, and we may need to expend a significant amount of time working with our customers to allocate limited supply and maintain positive customer relations, or we may incur additional costs in order to rush the manufacture and delivery of additional products. If we underestimate customers’ demand, we may forego revenue opportunities, lose market share and damage our customer relationships. Conversely, if we overestimate customer demand, we may purchase more inventory than we are able to sell at any given time or at all. In addition, we grant our distributors stock rotation rights, which require us to accept stock back from a distributor’s inventory, including obsolete inventory. As a result of our failure to properly estimate demand for our products, we could have excess or obsolete inventory, resulting in a decline in the value of our inventory, which would increase our costs of revenues and reduce our liquidity. Our failure to accurately manage inventory relative to demand would adversely affect our operating results.

If our technology does not work as well as planned or if we are unsuccessful in developing and selling new products or in penetrating new markets, our business and operating results would suffer.

Our success and ability to compete are dependent on technology which we have developed or may develop in the future. There is a risk that the technology that we have developed or may develop may not work as intended, or that the marketing of the technology may not be as successful as anticipated. Further, the markets in which we and our customers compete or plan to compete are characterized by constantly and rapidly changing technologies and technological obsolescence. Our ability to compete successfully depends on our ability to design, develop, manufacture, assemble, test, market and support new products and enhancements on a timely and cost effective basis to keep pace with market needs and satisfy the demands of customers. A fundamental shift in technologies in any of our target markets could harm our competitive position within these markets. Our failure to anticipate these shifts, to develop new technologies or to react to changes in existing technologies could materially delay our development of new products, which could result in product obsolescence, decreased revenue and a loss of customer wins to our competitors. The development of new technologies and products generally require substantial investment and can require long development and testing periods before they are commercially viable. We intend to continue to make substantial investments in developing new technologies and products and it is possible that that we may not successfully be able to develop or acquire new products or product enhancements that compete effectively within our target markets or differentiate our products based on functionality, performance or cost and that our new technologies and products will not result in meaningful revenue. Any delays in developing and releasing new or enhanced products could cause us to lose revenue opportunities and customers. Any technical flaws in product releases could diminish the innovative impact of our products and have a negative effect on customer adoption and our reputation. If we fail to introduce new products that meet the demands of our customers or target markets or do not achieve market acceptance, or if we fail to penetrate new markets, our revenue will not increase over time and our operating results and competitive position would suffer.

Computer malware, viruses, hacking and phishing attacks could harm our business and results of operations.

Computer malware, viruses, and computer hacking and phishing attacks have become more prevalent in our industry, and may occur on our systems in the future. Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security, and availability of our products and technical infrastructure to the satisfaction of our users may harm our reputation and our ability to attract and retain customers.

Our operating expenses will increase as we make further expenditures to enhance and expand our operations in order to support additional growth in our business.

Historically, we limited our investment in infrastructure; however, in the future we expect our infrastructure investments to increase substantially to support our anticipated growth. We intend to make additional investments in systems and personnel in order to expand our business and continue to expand our operations to support anticipated growth in our business. In addition, we may determine the need in the future to make changes to our sales model, which changes may result in higher selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of our revenues. As a result of these factors, we expect our operating expenses to increase.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If we do not effectively manage changes in our business, these changes could place a significant strain on our management and operations.

Our ability to grow successfully requires an effective planning and management process. The expansion and growth of our business could place a significant strain on our management systems, infrastructure and other resources. To manage our growth successfully, we must continue to improve and expand our systems and infrastructure in a timely and efficient manner. Our controls, systems, procedures and resources may not be adequate to support a changing and growing company. If our management fails to respond effectively to changes and growth in our business, including acquisitions, this could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

Our sales cycle is unpredictable, and a failure to generate consistent sales of our products could materially affect our financial position and operating results.

To date, we have not yet established a consistent sales cycle for our products. In addition, in our industry it is customary for potential customers to request a trial of products prior to making a purchase. There can be no assurance that such trials of our products will produce sales. If we cannot generate consistent sales of our products, our financial position and operating results could be materially affected.

If we are unable to expand our sales and marketing capabilities or enter into more agreements with third parties to sell and market any products we may develop, we may be unable to generate product revenue.

We are currently building our internal sales organization for the sales, marketing and distribution of our products. Part of the proceeds of the Offering is intended to be used to expand our internal sales organization and develop further our channels to market. In order to commercialize xMax® or any of our other products, we must build our sales, marketing, distribution, managerial and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with other parties to perform these services. The expansion of our own sales force to market any products we may develop will increase our operating costs and be time consuming. We cannot be certain that we would be able to successfully develop this capacity. If we are unable to expand our sales and marketing capability or any other non-technical capabilities necessary to commercialize any product we may develop, we will need to contract with other parties to market and sell any products we may develop. If we are unable to establish adequate sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, whether independently or with other parties, we may not be able to generate product revenue and may not become profitable.

If our estimates relating to our critical accounting policies are based on assumptions or judgments that change or prove to be incorrect, our operating results could fall below expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in our stock price.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires our management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities, equity, revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our operating results may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our operating results to fall below the expectations of financial analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in our stock price. Significant assumptions and estimates used in preparing our financial statements include those related to revenue recognition, inventory, product warranties, allowance for doubtful accounts, stock-based compensation expense, capitalization of intangible assets, impairment of long-lived assets and income taxes.

Our exposure to the credit risks of our customers may make it difficult to collect accounts receivable and could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

In the course of our sales to customers, we may encounter difficulty collecting accounts receivable and could be exposed to risks associated with uncollectible accounts receivable. Economic conditions may impact some of our customers’ ability to pay their accounts payable. While we will attempt to monitor these situations carefully and attempt to take appropriate measures to collect accounts receivable balances, we have

TABLE OF CONTENTS

written down accounts receivable and written off doubtful accounts in prior periods and may be unable to avoid accounts receivable write-downs or write-offs of doubtful accounts in the future. Such write-downs or write-offs could negatively affect our operating results for the period in which they occur.

Demand for our defense-related products and products for emergency response services and rural telecommunications depends on government spending.

The U.S. military market is largely dependent upon government budgets, particularly the defense budget. The funding of government programs is subject to Congressional appropriation. Although multi-year contracts may be authorized in connection with major procurements, Congress generally appropriates funds on a fiscal year basis even though a program may be expected to continue for several years. Consequently, programs are often only partially funded and additional funds are committed only as Congress makes further appropriations. No assurance can be given that an increase in defense spending will be allocated to programs that would benefit our business. A decrease in levels of defense spending or the government’s termination of, or failure to fully fund, one or more of the contracts for which our products may be utilized could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

In addition, the sale of our products to local municipalities for emergency response services and to rural telecommunication companies depends on government spending allocated to such areas. There can be no assurance that government spending will be allocated to emergency response services or to rural telecommunications companies at a level that would benefit our business. A decrease in levels of government spending for emergency response services or rural telecommunications, or the government’s termination of, or failure to fully fund, one or more of the contracts for which our products may be utilized with respect to emergency response services or rural telecommunications, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Our failure to obtain and maintain required certifications could impair our ability to bid on defense contracts.

In order for us to participate in certain government programs we could be required to obtain and maintain quality certification and certain standards for Department of Defense wireless security such as certification by the Joint Interoperability and Test Command, (or “JITC”) and to meet production standards in order to be eligible to bid on government contracts. If we fail to maintain these certifications or any additional certification which may be required, we will be ineligible to bid for contracts which may impair our financial operations and consequently, our ability to continue in business.

Regulation of the telecommunications industry could harm our operating results and future prospects.

The traditional telecommunications industry is highly regulated, and our business and financial condition could be adversely affected by changes in regulations relating to the Internet telecommunications industry.

Currently, there are few laws or regulations that apply directly to access to or commerce on IP networks, but future regulations could include sales taxes and tariffs in previously unregulated areas and provider access charges. We could be adversely affected by regulation of IP networks and commerce in any country where we market equipment and services to service or content providers. Regulations governing the range of services and business models that can be offered by service providers or content providers could adversely affect those customers’ needs for products designed to enable a wide range of such services or business models. For instance, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission has issued regulations governing aspects of fixed broadband networks and wireless networks. These regulations might impact service provider and content provider business models and as such, providers’ needs for Internet telecommunications equipment and services. In addition, many jurisdictions are evaluating or implementing regulations relating to cyber security, privacy and data protection, which could affect the market and requirements for networking and security equipment.

In addition, environmental regulations relevant to electronic equipment manufacturing or operations may impact our business and financial condition adversely. For instance, the European Union has adopted regulations on Electronic waste, e-waste, e-scrap, or waste electrical and electronic equipment (“WEEE”), Restriction of the Use of certain Hazardous Substances (“ROHS”) and Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and Restriction of Chemical substances (“REACH”). In addition, some governments have regulations prohibiting government entities from purchasing security products that do not meet specified indigenous certification criteria even though those criteria may be in conflict with accepted international standards. Similar regulations are in effect or under consideration in several jurisdictions where we do business.

The adoption and implementation of such regulations could decrease demand for our products, increase the cost of building and selling our products and impact our ability to ship products into affected areas and recognize revenue in a timely manner. Any of these impacts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

To the extent that we subcontract work under our contracts, any failures by our subcontractors could impair our relations with the contracting agencies.

We may use subcontractors to perform work or provide materials for contracts that we may secure and we may become dependent upon the subcontractors to meet the quality and delivery requirements of the contracting agency. To the extent that the products or services provided by the subcontractors do not meet the required specifications or are delivered late, the contract may be terminated by the U.S. government for default. Such a default could result in our disqualification from bidding on contracts, which could adversely affect our financial operations.

As an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act, we will utilize certain modified disclosure requirements, and we cannot be certain if these reduced requirements will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act. We have in this prospectus utilized, and we plan in future filings with the SEC to continue to utilize, the modified disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies, including reduced disclosure about our executive compensation and omission of compensation discussion and analysis, and an exemption from the requirement of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation. In addition, we will not be subject to certain requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the additional testing of our internal control over financial reporting as may occur when outside auditors attest as to our internal control over financial reporting. As a result, our stockholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can utilize the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Thus, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to utilize this extended transition period. Our financial statements may therefore not be comparable to those of companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards as they become applicable to public companies. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

We could remain an emerging growth company for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenue exceeds $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period.

We have not engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to perform an audit of our internal control over financial reporting as of any balance sheet date or for any period reported in our financial statements. Had our independent registered public accounting firm performed an audit of our internal control over financial reporting, additional material weaknesses may have been identified. For so long as we qualify as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act, which may be up to five years following this offering, we will not have to provide an auditor’s attestation report on our internal controls in future annual reports on Form 10-K as otherwise required by Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. During the course of the evaluation, documentation or attestation, we or our independent registered public accounting firm may identify

TABLE OF CONTENTS

weaknesses and deficiencies that we may not otherwise identify in a timely manner or at all as a result of the deferred implementation of this additional level of review.

Risks Relating to Our Industry

Our industry is subject to rapid technological change, and we must make substantial investments in new products, services and technologies to compete successfully.

New technological innovations generally require a substantial investment before they are commercially viable. We intend to continue to make substantial investments in developing new products and technologies, and it is possible that our development efforts will not be successful and that our new technologies will not result in meaningful revenues. Our future success will depend on our ability to continue to develop and introduce new products, technologies and enhancements on a timely basis. Our future success will also depend on our ability to keep pace with technological developments, protect our intellectual property, satisfy customer requirements, meet customer expectations, price our products and services competitively and achieve market acceptance. The introduction of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render our existing products and technologies, and products and technologies currently under development, obsolete and unmarketable. If we fail to anticipate or respond adequately to technological developments or customer requirements, or experience any significant delays in development, introduction or shipment of our products and technologies in commercial quantities, demand for our products and our customers’ and licensees’ products that use our technologies could decrease, and our competitive position could be damaged.

We may be subject to infringement claims in the future.

We may be unaware of filed patent applications and issued patents that could include claims covering our products. Parties making claims of infringement may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief that could effectively block our ability to sell or supply our products or license our technology and could cause us to pay substantial royalties, licensing fees or damages. The defense of any lawsuit could divert management’s efforts and attention from ordinary business operations and result in time-consuming and expensive litigation, regardless of the merits of such claims. These outcomes may (i) require us to stop selling products or using technology that contains the allegedly infringing intellectual property; (ii) require us to redesign those products that contain the allegedly infringing intellectual property; (iii) require us to pay substantial damages to the party whose intellectual property rights we may be found to be infringing; (iv) result in the loss of existing customers or prohibit the acquisition of new customers; (v) cause us to attempt to obtain a license to the relevant intellectual property from third parties, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all; (vi) materially and adversely affect our brand in the market place and cause a substantial loss of goodwill; (vii) cause our stock price to decline significantly; (viii) materially and adversely affect our liquidity, including our ability to pay debts and other obligations as they become due; or (ix) lead to our bankruptcy or liquidation.

Our industry is highly competitive and we may not be able to compete effectively.

The communications industry is highly competitive, rapidly evolving, and subject to constant technological change. We expect that new competitors are likely to join existing competitors. Many of our competitors may be larger and have greater financial, technical, operational, marketing and other resources and experience than we do. In the event that a competitor expends significant resources we may not be able to successfully compete. In addition, the pace of technological change makes it impossible for us to predict whether we will face new competitors using different technologies to provide products. If our competitors were to provide better and more cost effective products than our products we may not be able to capture any significant market share.

Regulation of Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) services is developing and therefore uncertain and future legislative, regulatory or judicial actions could adversely affect our business.

VoIP services have developed in an environment largely free from government regulation. However, the United States and other countries have begun to assert regulatory authority over VoIP and are continuing to evaluate how VoIP will be regulated in the future. Both the application of existing rules to us and our

TABLE OF CONTENTS

prospective customers and the effects of future regulatory developments are uncertain. Future legislative, judicial or other regulatory actions could have a negative effect on our business. In addition, future regulatory developments could increase our cost of doing business and limit its growth.

Changes in current laws or regulations or the imposition of new laws or regulations could impede the sale of our products or otherwise harm our business.

Although our technology is designed to be frequency agnostic (i.e., capable of operating at any frequency) our current range of products is being designed to be optimized for operation in the 902 – 928 MHz band, which is presently a spectrum that is not licensed in the United States. Changes in current laws or regulations or the imposition of new laws and regulations in the United States or elsewhere regarding the usage of unlicensed spectrum may materially and adversely impact our future prospects, the viability of our current business model, our expectations for future sales of our products and our business, financial condition and results of operations.

New regulations or standards or changes in existing regulations or standards in the United States or internationally related to our products may result in unanticipated costs or liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and future sales, and could place additional burdens on the operations of our business.

Our products may be subject to governmental regulations in a variety of jurisdictions. In order to achieve and maintain market acceptance, our technology and products will have to comply with these regulations as well as a significant number of industry standards. In the United States, our technology and products will have to comply with various regulations defined by the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, and others. We may also have to comply with similar international regulations. For example, our wireless communication products operate through the transmission of radio signals, and radio emissions are subject to regulation in the United States and in other countries in which we intend to do business. In the United States, various federal agencies including the Center for Devices and Radiological Health of the Food and Drug Administration, the FCC, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and various state agencies have promulgated regulations that concern the use of radio/electromagnetic emissions standards. Member countries of the European Union have enacted similar standards concerning electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility and emissions, and chemical substances and use standards.

As these regulations and standards evolve, and if new regulations or standards are implemented, we may be required to modify our technology or products or develop and support new versions of our technology or products, and our compliance with these regulations and standards may become more burdensome. The failure of technology or our products to comply, or delays in compliance, with the various existing and evolving industry regulations and standards could prevent or delay introduction of our technology or products, which could harm our business. End-customer uncertainty regarding future policies may also affect demand for communications products, including our products. Moreover, channel partners or end-customers may require us, or we may otherwise deem it necessary or advisable, to alter our technology or products to address actual or anticipated changes in the regulatory environment. Our inability to alter our technology or products to address these requirements and any regulatory changes may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including new regulations requiring higher standards, may increase our costs, limit our ability to utilize supply chains, and force design changes to our products.

Our operations are subject to a variety of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and equivalent local, state, and regulatory agencies in each of the jurisdictions in which we currently operate or may operate in the future. The manufacturing of our products uses substances regulated under various federal, state, local laws and regulations governing the environment and worker health and safety. If we and our contract manufacturers do not comply with these laws including any new regulations, such non-compliance could reduce the net realizable value of our products, which would result in an immediate charge to our income statements. Our non-compliance with such laws could also negatively impact our operations and financial position as a result of fines, penalties that may be imposed on us, and the cost of mandated

TABLE OF CONTENTS

remediation or delays to our contract manufacturers, thus we may suffer a loss of revenues, be unable to sell our products in certain markets and/or countries, be subject to penalties and enforced fees and/or suffer a competitive disadvantage. Costs to comply with current laws and regulations and/or similar future laws and regulations, if applicable, could include costs associated with modifying our products, recycling and other waste processing costs, legal and regulatory costs and insurance costs. We cannot assure you that the costs to comply with these new laws or with current and future environmental and worker health and safety laws will not have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Governmental regulations affecting the import or export of products or affecting products containing encryption capabilities could negatively affect our revenues.

The United States and various foreign governments have imposed controls, export license requirements, and restrictions on the import or export of some technologies, especially encryption technology. In addition, from time to time, governmental agencies have proposed additional regulation of encryption technology, such as requiring certification, notifications, review of source code, or the escrow and governmental recovery of private encryption keys. For example, Russia and China recently have implemented new requirements relating to products containing encryption and India has imposed special warranty and other obligations associated with technology deemed critical. Governmental regulation of encryption or IP networking technology and regulation of imports or exports, or our failure to obtain required import or export approval for our products, could harm our international and domestic sales prospects and adversely affect our revenue expectation. In addition, failure to comply with such regulations could result in penalties, costs, and restrictions on import or export privileges or adversely affect sales to government agencies or government funded projects.

If wireless devices pose safety risks, we may be subject to new regulations, and demand for our products and those of our licensees and customers may decrease.

Concerns over the effects of radio frequency emissions, even if unfounded, may have the effect of discouraging the use of wireless devices, which may decrease demand for our products and those of our licensees and customers. In recent years, the FCC and foreign regulatory agencies have updated the guidelines and methods they use for evaluating radio frequency emissions from radio equipment, including wireless phones and other wireless devices. In addition, interest groups have requested that the FCC investigate claims that wireless communication technologies pose health concerns and cause interference with airbags, hearing aids and medical devices. Concerns have also been expressed over the possibility of safety risks due to a lack of attention associated with the use of wireless devices while driving. Any legislation that may be adopted in response to these expressions of concern could reduce demand for our products and those of our licensees and customers in the United States as well as foreign countries.

Risks Related to Market Conditions

Recent global economic trends could adversely affect our business, liquidity and financial results.

Recent global economic conditions, including a disruption of financial markets, could adversely affect us, primarily through limiting our access to capital. In addition, the continuation or worsening of general market conditions in economies important to our businesses may adversely affect our clients’ level of spending and ability to obtain financing, leading to us being unable to generate the levels of sales that we require. Current and continued disruption of financial markets could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

Risks Relating to our Common Stock and the Offering

Our insiders and affiliated parties beneficially own a significant portion of our common stock.

As of August 11, 2015, our executive officers, directors and affiliated parties beneficially own approximately 32.18% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, our executive officers, directors and affiliated parties will have significant influence to:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition, sales of significant amounts of shares of common stock held by our directors and executive officers, or the prospect of such sales, could adversely affect the valuation of our Company.

Exercise of options or warrants or conversion of convertible securities may have a dilutive effect on your percentage ownership and may result in a dilution of your voting power and an increase in the number of shares of common stock eligible for future resale in the public market, which may negatively impact the trading price of our shares of common stock.

The exercise or conversion of some or all of our outstanding options, warrants, or convertible securities could result in significant dilution in the percentage ownership interest of investors in this offering and in the percentage ownership interest of our existing common stockholders and in a significant dilution of voting rights and earnings per share.

As of August 11, 2015, we have outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of up to 71,430 shares of our common stock outside of the incentive plans, including (i) the options to purchase 57,144 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $55.00 per share granted to MB Technology Holdings, LLC (“MBTH”) and (ii) the options to purchase 14,286 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $87.50 per share granted to MBTH; and outstanding warrants to purchase up to 546,151 shares of common stock, including (i) the warrants to subscribe up to 4,286 shares of our common stock at a subscription price of $3.50 per share granted to MBTH, (ii) the warrant to purchase 858 shares of our common stock issued to Secure Strategy Group exercisable at $350.00 per share, (iii) the warrant to purchase 1,429 shares of our common stock exercisable at $78.70 per share granted to Mats Wennberg, (iv) 76,923 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants sold to investors as part of our initial public offering completed on July 24, 2013, including those issued as part of the over-allotment, which are exercisable at $68.70 per share, (v) the warrants to purchase 4,014 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $68.70 per share granted to the underwriters pursuant to our initial public offering, (vi) the warrants to purchase 136,364 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $68.70 per share issued pursuant to a onetime agreement approved on September 30, 2013, (vii) the warrants to purchase 109,378 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $68.70 per share granted pursuant to the conversion of the bridge loan and outstanding securities convertible into 5,715 shares of our common stock issuable to Treco at a conversion price of $350.00 per share, (viii) 2,787 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the rights granted to investors as part of the bridge loan, which are exercisable at $3.50 share, (ix) the warrants to purchase 17,145 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $21.875 per share granted to the underwriters pursuant to our public offering completed on November 18, 2013, (x) the warrants to purchase 37,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share granted to the investors in the December 30, 2014 private placement, (xi) the warrants to purchase 17,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share granted to the investors in the February 11, 2015 private placement, (xii) the warrants to purchase 42,250 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $20.00 per share granted to the investors in the February 23, 2015 private placement, and (xiii) the warrants to purchase 90,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share granted to the investors in the February 24, 2015 private placement.

Additionally, the issuance of up to 311,993 shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options outstanding under our stock incentive plans will further dilute our stockholders’ voting interests. To the extent options and/or warrants and/or conversion rights are exercised, additional shares of common stock will be issued, and such issuance will dilute stockholders.

As of August 11, 2015, 326,667 shares of our common stock may be issued upon conversion of $1,633,333 in principal amount of 8% Convertible Notes based on a conversion price of $5.00.

In addition to the dilutive effects described above, the exercise of those securities would lead to an increase in the number of shares of common stock eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares of common stock in the public market could adversely affect the market price of our shares of common stock. Substantial dilution and/or a substantial increase in the number of shares of common stock available for future resale may negatively impact the trading price of our shares of common stock. Holders who receive common stock upon conversion of the 8% Convertible Notes will be subject to the risk of volatility in the trading price of the common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investors will incur immediate and substantial dilution as a result of this offering.

Investors purchasing securities in this offering will incur immediate and substantial dilution in net tangible book value per share. Assuming a public offering price of $1.55 per Class A Unit and $1.55 (including and assuming the exercise of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants underlying the Class B Units) per Class B Unit, purchasers of Class A Units and Class B Units will effectively incur dilution of $1.28 per share in the net tangible book value of their purchased shares. To the extent that any of the Offering Warrants are ultimately exercised, you will sustain further dilution. Furthermore, you may experience further dilution to the extent that shares of our common stock are issued upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants. See “Dilution” for a discussion of the dilution to the purchasers in this offering.

We may seek to raise additional funds, finance acquisitions or develop strategic relationships by issuing securities that would dilute your ownership. Depending on the terms available to us, if these activities result in significant dilution, it may negatively impact the trading price of our shares of common stock.

We have financed our operations, and we expect to continue to finance our operations, acquisitions, if any, and the development of strategic relationships by issuing equity and/or convertible securities, which could significantly reduce the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders. Further, any additional financing that we secure may require the granting of rights, preferences or privileges senior to, or pari passu with, those of our common stock. Any issuances by us of equity securities may be at or below the prevailing market price of our common stock and in any event may have a dilutive impact on your ownership interest, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. We may also raise additional funds through the incurrence of debt or the issuance or sale of other securities or instruments senior to our shares of common stock. The holders of any securities or instruments we may issue may have rights superior to the rights of our common stockholders. If we experience dilution from issuance of additional securities and we grant superior rights to new securities over common stockholders, it may negatively impact the trading price of our shares of common stock and you may lose all or part of your investment.

The market price of our shares of common stock is particularly volatile given our status as a relatively unknown company with a small and thinly traded public float and lack of profits, which could lead to wide fluctuations in our share price. You may be unable to sell your shares of common stock at or above your purchase price, which may result in substantial losses to you.

The market for our shares of common stock is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to the shares of larger, more established companies that trade on a national securities exchange and have large public floats, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than the shares of such larger, more established companies for the indefinite future. The volatility in our share price is attributable to a number of factors. First, as noted above, our shares of common stock are, compared to the shares of such larger, more established companies, sporadically and thinly traded. The price for our shares of common stock could, for example, decline precipitously in the event that a large number of our shares of common stock are sold on the market without commensurate demand. Secondly, we are a speculative or “risky” investment due to our lack of profits to date. As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the fear of losing all or most of their investment in the event of negative news or lack of progress, be more inclined to sell their shares of common stock on the market more quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a larger, more established company that trades on a national securities exchange and has a large public float. Many of these factors are beyond our control and may decrease the market price of our shares of common stock, regardless of our operating performance.

If and when a larger trading market for our common stock develops, the market price of our common stock is still likely to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations, and you may be unable to resell your shares of common stock at or above the price at which you acquired them.

The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors that are beyond our control, including, but not limited to:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition, if the market for technology stocks or the stock market in general experiences loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition or operating results. The trading price of our shares of common stock might also decline in reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry, even if these events do not directly affect us. Each of these factors, among others, could harm the value of your investment in our common stock. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against companies. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

There is presently no public market for the Offering Warrants being sold in this offering.

There is presently no established public trading market for the Offering Warrants being offered in this offering and we do not expect a market to develop. Without an active market, the liquidity of the warrants will be limited. Further, the existence of the Offering Warrants may act to reduce both the trading volume and the trading price of our common stock.

Purchasers of our Offering Warrants will not have rights of common stock shareholders until such Offering Warrants are exercised.

The Offering Warrants being offered do not confer any rights of common stock ownership on their holders, such as voting rights or the right to receive dividends, but rather merely represent the right to acquire shares of common stock at a fixed price for a limited period of time. Specifically, commencing on the date of issuance, holders of the Series A Warrants may exercise their right to acquire the common stock and pay an exercise price of $1.55 per share (100% of the public offering price of the Class A Units) prior to five (5) years from the date of issuance, after which date any unexercised Series A Warrants will expire and have no further value; commencing on the date of issuance, holders of Pre-funded Series B Warrants may exercise their right to acquire common stock and pay an exercise price of $0.01 per share prior to five years from the date of issuance, after which date any unexercised Pre-funded Series B Warrants will expire and have no further value; commencing on the date of issuance, holders of the Series C Warrants may exercise their right to acquire additional Class A Units and pay an initial exercise price of $1.55 per Class A Unit (100% of the public offering price of the Class A Units) (subject to adjustment at the close of trading on the 60^th trading day following the date of issuance, and effective beginning on the third (3^rd) trading day immediately preceding such 60^th trading day, to an exercise price per Class A Unit equal to the lowest of (i) the then-effective exercise price per Class A Unit, (ii) 80% of the closing price of our common stock on such 60^th trading day and (iii) 80% of the average of the VWAP for the (3) trading days ending and including the 60^th trading day following the date of issuance) prior to sixty-five (65) days from the date of issuance, after which date any unexercised Series C Warrants will expire and have no further value; and commencing on the date of issuance, holders of the Series D Warrants may exercise their right to acquire additional Class B Units and pay an exercise price of $1.54 per Class B Unit (100% of the public offering price of the Class B Units) (subject to adjustment at the close of trading on the 60^th trading day following the date of issuance, and effective beginning on the third (3^rd) trading day immediately preceding such 60^th trading day, to an exercise price per Class B Unit equal to the lowest of (i) the then-effective exercise price per Class B Unit, (ii) 80% of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the closing price of our common stock on such 60^th trading day and (iii) 80% of the average of the VWAP for the (3) trading days ending and including the 60^th trading day following the date of issuance) prior to sixty-five (65) days from the date of issuance, after which date any unexercised Series D Warrants will expire and have no further value.

Our charter documents and Delaware law could prevent a takeover that stockholders consider favorable and could also reduce the market price of our common stock.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could delay or prevent a change in control of our Company. These provisions could also make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. These provisions include:

In addition, the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law govern us. These provisions may prohibit large stockholders, in particular those owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock, from merging or combining with us for a certain period of time without the consent of our board of directors.

These and other provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws and under Delaware law could discourage potential takeover attempts, reduce the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock and result in the market price of our common stock being lower than it would be without these provisions.

If we are not able to comply with the applicable continued listing requirements or standards of the NASDAQ Capital Market, NASDAQ could delist our common stock.

Our common stock is currently listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market. In order to maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other continued listing requirements and standards, including those regarding director independence and independent committee requirements, minimum stockholders’ equity, minimum share price, and certain corporate governance requirements. There can be no assurances that we will be able to comply with the applicable listing standards.

In the event that our common stock is delisted from the NASDAQ Capital Market and is not eligible for quotation on another market or exchange, trading of our common stock could be conducted in the over-the-counter market or on an electronic bulletin board established for unlisted securities such as the Pink Sheets or the OTC Bulletin Board. In such event, it could become more difficult to dispose of, or obtain accurate price quotations for, our common stock, and there would likely also be a reduction in our coverage by securities analysts and the news media, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline further. Also, it may be difficult for us to raise additional capital if we are not listed on a major exchange.

In the event that our common stock is delisted from NASDAQ, U.S. broker-dealers may be discouraged from effecting transactions in shares of our common stock because they may be considered penny stocks and thus be subject to the penny stock rules.

The SEC has adopted a number of rules to regulate “penny stock” that restrict transactions involving stock which is deemed to be penny stock. Such rules include Rules 3a51-1, 15g-1, 15g-2, 15g-3, 15g-4, 15g-5, 15g-6, 15g-7, and 15g-9 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These rules may have the effect of reducing the liquidity of penny stocks. “Penny stocks” generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 per share (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market if current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system). Our shares of common stock have in the past constituted, and may again in the future constitute, “penny stock” within the meaning of the rules. The additional sales practice and disclosure requirements imposed upon

TABLE OF CONTENTS

U.S. broker-dealers may discourage such broker-dealers from effecting transactions in shares of our common stock, which could severely limit the market liquidity of such shares of common stock and impede their sale in the secondary market.

A U.S. broker-dealer selling penny stock to anyone other than an established customer or “accredited investor” (generally, an individual with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or an annual income exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with his or her spouse) must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and must receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to sale, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt. In addition, the “penny stock” regulations require the U.S. broker-dealer to deliver, prior to any transaction involving a “penny stock”, a disclosure schedule prepared in accordance with SEC standards relating to the “penny stock” market, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt. A U.S. broker-dealer is also required to disclose commissions payable to the U.S. broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, a U.S. broker-dealer is required to submit monthly statements disclosing recent price information with respect to the “penny stock” held in a customer’s account and information with respect to the limited market in “penny stocks”.

Stockholders should be aware that, according to the SEC, the market for “penny stocks” has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (i) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (ii) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (iii) “boiler room” practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (iv) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (v) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, resulting in investor losses. Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities.

We have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from this offering and may not use them effectively.

Our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering, including for any of the purposes described in the section of this prospectus entitled “Use of Proceeds.” The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could harm our business. Pending their use, we may invest the net proceeds from this offering in short-term, investment-grade, interest-bearing securities. These investments may not yield a favorable return to our stockholders.

We have not paid dividends in the past and do not expect to pay dividends for the foreseeable future, and any return on investment may be limited to potential future appreciation on the value of our common stock.

We currently intend to retain any future earnings to support the development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our shares of common stock in the foreseeable future. Our payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors after taking into account various factors, including without limitation, our financial condition, operating results, cash needs, growth plans and the terms of any credit agreements that we may be a party to at the time. To the extent we do not pay dividends, our shares of common stock may be less valuable because a return on investment will only occur if and to the extent our stock price appreciates, which may never occur. In addition, investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation as the only way to realize their investment, and if the price of our common stock does not appreciate, then there will be no return on investment. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock.

Non-U.S. investors may have difficulty effecting service of process against us or enforcing judgments against us in courts of non-U.S. jurisdictions.

We are incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware. All of our directors and officers reside in the United States. It may not be possible for non-U.S. investors to effect service of process within their own

TABLE OF CONTENTS

jurisdictions upon our company and our directors and officers. In addition, it may not be possible for non-U.S. investors to collect from our company and our directors and officers judgments obtained in courts in such non-U.S. jurisdictions predicated on non-U.S. legislation.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about us, our business or our market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our common stock adversely, our share price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our shares of common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors. If any of the analysts who may cover us change their recommendation regarding our common stock adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors, our share price would likely decline. If any analyst who may cover us were to cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.

The requirements of being a U.S. public company may strain our resources and divert management’s attention.

As a U.S. public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of NASDAQ, and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming, or costly, and increase demand on our systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual and current reports with respect to our business and operating results.

As a result of disclosure of information in this prospectus and in filings required of a public company, our business and financial condition is more visible, which we believe may result in threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and other third parties. If such claims are successful, our business and operating results could be harmed, and even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could divert resources of our management and harm our business and operating results.

We acknowledge material weaknesses in the controls and procedures of our financial reporting and may identify additional material weaknesses in the future that may cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, including timeliness, or result in material misstatements of our financial statements. If we continue to fail to remediate our material weaknesses or if we fail to implement effective controls and procedures for our financial reporting, our ability to accurately and timely report our financial results could be adversely affected, which likely would adversely affect the value of our common stock.

Our management has previously identified a material weakness regarding inadequate accounting resources due to the need to hire accounting personnel with the requisite knowledge of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company made progress to remedy this deficiency through the hiring of a financial controller to support the accounting personnel. The financial controller began employment in September 2013 and has now been fully integrated into the Company’s control process. However, due to the recent loss of accounting personnel through cost cutting measures and the need to deal with complex accounting transactions, we believe that our disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting are not yet effective.

A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Failure of our internal control systems to prevent error or fraud could materially adversely impact us, could lead to restatements of our financial statements and investors not being able to rely on the completeness and accuracy of the financial information contained in our filings with the SEC, and could potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities or stockholder litigation. Any such failure could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information or our ongoing ability to meet SEC filing deadlines, which likely would adversely affect the value of our common stock and severely limit or even eliminate the prospects for our success in obtaining new capital.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus, including the sections entitled “Risk Factors”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business”, contains forward-looking statements that include information relating to future events, future financial performance, strategies, expectations, our competitive environment, regulation and availability of resources. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding: proposed new products or services; our statements concerning litigation or other matters; statements concerning projections, predictions, expectations, estimates or forecasts for our business, financial and operating results and future economic performance; statements of management’s goals and objectives; trends affecting our financial condition, results of operations or future prospects; our financing plans or growth strategies; and other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Words such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “would”, “predicts”, “potential”, “continue”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “future”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes” and “estimates,” and similar expressions, as well as similar statements in the future tense, identify forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by which, that performance or those results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information available at the time they are made and/or management’s good faith belief as of that time with respect to future events, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from what is expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information, except to the extent required by applicable securities laws. If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that the net proceeds in this offering will be approximately $3,603,323, based on the public offering price of $1.55 per Class A Unit and $1.55 per Class B Unit (including and assuming the exercise of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants underlying the Class B Units), or approximately $9,626,573 if the Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants are exercised in full based on exercise prices of $1.55 and $1.55 (including and assuming the exercise of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants underlying the Class B Units), respectively, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions, solicitation fees on the exercise of the Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants, and estimated offering expenses payable by us, and after deduction.

The principal purposes of this offering are to increase our capitalization and financial flexibility and to increase our visibility in the marketplace. As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot specify with certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds of this offering. However, we currently intend to use the net proceeds to us from this offering primarily for general corporate purposes, including working capital, product development, marketing activities, expanding our internal sales organization and further developing sales channels, funding the set-up of contract manufacturing production lines, and other capital expenditures.

If we raise gross proceeds of at least $7,000,000 from this offering, we will be required to redeem the 8% Convertible Notes, which have an interest rate of 8% per annum and maturity dates of December 11, 2015 and January 14, 2016, for a total amount of $2,041,667 plus accrued interest. The terms of the 8% Convertible Notes are more fully described in “Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Subsequent Events.”

We will have broad discretion over the uses of the net proceeds in this offering. Pending these uses, we intend to invest the net proceeds from this offering in short-term, investment-grade interest-bearing securities such as money market funds, certificates of deposit, commercial paper and guaranteed obligations of the U.S. government.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MARKET PRICE INFORMATION FOR OUR SECURITIES

Our shares of common stock are currently listed on NASDAQ under the symbol “XGTI”. Our shares of common stock began trading on NASDAQ on July 19, 2013 and on the London Stock Exchange’s AIM market on November 20, 2006. The cancellation of trading of the Company’s common stock on the London Stock Exchange’s AIM Market became effective January 3, 2014.

On August 11, 2015, the closing price of our shares of common stock listed on NASDAQ was $1.55 per share.

The following table shows the high and low market prices for our common stock for each fiscal quarter for the two most recent fiscal years. Market prices for our common stock have fluctuated significantly. As a result, the market prices shown in the following table may not be indicative of the market prices at which our common stock will trade after this offering.

										XGTU Share Price								XGT Share Price
		NASDAQ Share Price								(US Dollars)								(US Dollars)
Quarter		High				Low				High				Low				High				Low
Third Quarter 2015 (Through August 11, 2015)		$	3.20			$	1.39				N/A				N/A				N/A				N/A
Second Quarter 2015		$	5.60			$	2.00				N/A				N/A				N/A				N/A
First Quarter 2015		$	6.40			$	2.60				N/A				N/A				N/A				N/A
Fourth Quarter 2014		$	20.50			$	4.90				N/A				N/A				N/A				N/A
Third Quarter 2014		$	27.40			$	18.60				N/A				N/A				N/A				N/A
Second Quarter 2014		$	30.10			$	12.80				N/A				N/A				N/A				N/A
First Quarter 2014(**)		$	50.01			$	11.20				N/A				N/A				N/A				N/A
Fourth Quarter 2013		$	51.00			$	14.00			$	5.50			$	1.00			$	10.00			$	10.00
Third Quarter 2013(*)		$	71.50			$	46.00			$	9.00			$	5.50			$	13.00			$	10.00
Second Quarter 2013			N/A				N/A			$	10.01			$	6.75			$	13.00			$	13.00
First Quarter 2013			N/A				N/A			$	13.13			$	7.88			$	15.75			$	14.00

Holders

As of August 11, 2015, there were 5,128,883 shares of our common stock outstanding and approximately 171 holders of record of our shares of our common stock. Because shares of our common stock are held by depositories, brokers and other nominees, the number of beneficial holders of shares of our common stock is substantially larger than the number of stockholders of record. Our transfer agent and registrar is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 17 Battery Place, 8^th Floor, New York, New York 10004.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain any future earnings and do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of March 31, 2015, as adjusted for the reverse stock split, which we effected on July 17, 2015:

The information below is illustrative only and our capitalization following the completion of this offering will be adjusted based on the actual sales price of the Class A Units and Class B Units. You should read this table together with the sections entitled “Use of Proceeds” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” as well as our financial statements and the related notes, which appear elsewhere in this prospectus.

		As of March 31, 2015 (Unaudited)
($ in thousands)		Actual				As Adjusted
Cash and cash equivalents		$	221			$	3,824
Short-term debt
Accrued interest			87				87
Due to related parties			264				264
Deferred revenue			50				50
Obligation under capital lease			135				135
Long-term debt
Long-term obligation under capital lease			83				83
Convertible notes payable			2,000				2,000
Total debt and accrued interest			2,619				2,619
Derivative Liability			520				2,470
Series A convertible preferred stock – $0.00001 par value per share: 3,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2015 and As Adjusted; 0 issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and As Adjusted (liquidation preference of $0 at March 31, 2015)			—				—
Series B convertible preferred stock – $0.00001 par value per share: 3,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2015 and As Adjusted; 250,000 issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and As Adjusted (liquidation preference of $252,300 at March 31, 2015)			104				104
Series C convertible preferred stock – $0.00001 par value per share: 3,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2015 and As Adjusted; 1,589,720 issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and As Adjusted (liquidation preference of $1,600,391 at March 31, 2015)			895				895
Equity
Preferred stock – $0.00001 par value per share: 1,000,000 and 7,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2015 and As Adjusted; none issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and As Adjusted			—				—
Common stock, – $0.00001 par value, 100,000,000 authorized, 3,641,914          shares issued as of March 31, 2015 and 6,427,554 As Adjusted, respectively			— *				— *
Additional paid in capital			190,302				191,955
Accumulated deficit			(174,077	)			(174,077	)
Treasury stock, 229 shares			(22	)			(22	)
Total stockholders’ equity			16,203				17,856
Total capitalization		$	18,822			$	20,475

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DILUTION

The net tangible book value of our common stock as of March 31, 2015, was approximately $92,000, or $0.025 per share of common stock based upon 3,641,914 shares of common stock outstanding on such date. As adjusted net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets reduced by the amount of our total liabilities, divided by the total number of shares of common stock outstanding after giving effect to the sale of up to 1,012,340 Class A Units and up to 1,773,300 Class B Units we are offering based upon an assumed public offering price of $1.55 per Class A Unit and $1.55 per Class B Unit (including and assuming the exercise of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants underlying the Class B Units), and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and approximately $369,000 in estimated offering expenses payable by us.

If you invest in our Class A Units and Class B Units in this offering, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the offering price per Class A Unit and per Class B Unit and the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after completion of this offering. This represents an immediate increase in as adjusted net tangible book value of $0.24 per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of $1.28 per share to investors purchasing Class A Units and Class B Units in this offering.

The following table illustrates this dilution on a per share basis to new investors:

Assumed public offering price per Class A Unit		$	1.55
Assumed public offering price per Class B Unit (including and assuming the exercise of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants underlying the Class B Units)		$	1.55
As adjusted net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2015 before giving effect to this offering		$	0.03
Increase in as adjusted net tangible book value per share attributed to new investors purchasing shares from us in this offering		$	0.24
As adjusted net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering		$	0.27
Dilution in as adjusted net tangible book value per share to new investors in this offering		$	1.28

Each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of $1.55 per Class A Unit or $1.55 per Class B Unit (including and assuming the exercise of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants underlying the Class B Units) would increase (decrease) the net tangible book value, as adjusted to give effect to this offering, by $0.40 per share and the dilution to new investors by $0.60 per share, assuming that the number of Class A Units and Class B Units offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions. If the Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants are exercised in full, the net tangible book value per share of our common stock, as adjusted to give effect to this offering, would be $0.46 per share, and the dilution in as adjusted net tangible book value per share to investors in this offering would be $1.09 per share of our common stock.

The table below summarizes as of March 31, 2015, on an as adjusted basis as described above, the number of shares of our common stock, the total consideration and the average price per share (i) paid to us by our existing stockholders and (ii) to be paid by new investors purchasing our Class A Units and Class B Units in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $1.55 per Class A Unit and $1.55 per Class B Unit (including and assuming the exercise of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants underlying the Class B Units), the closing price of our common stock as listed on NASDAQ on August 11, 2015, before deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

		Shares or Shares Underlying Class A Units and Class B Units Purchased								Total Consideration								Average Price Per Class A and Class B Unit
		Number				Percent				Amount				Percent
Existing stockholders			3,641,914				57	%		$	179,914,598				98	%		$	49.40
New investors			2,785,640				43	%		$	4,317,742				2	%		$	1.55
Total			6,427,554				100	%		$	184,232,340				100	%		$	28.66

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The total number of shares of our common stock reflected in the discussion and tables above is based on 3,641,914 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2015, and excludes:

To the extent that any convertible debt is converted, outstanding warrants are exercised, outstanding options are exercised, new options are issued under our 2013 Long Term Incentive Plan or we issue additional shares of common stock in the future, there will be further dilution to investors participating in this offering. If all outstanding options under our 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009 and 2013 Stock Incentive Plans and options/warrants issued outside of the stock incentive plans as of August 11, 2015, were exercised, then our existing stockholders, including the holders of these options, would own 62% and the purchasers of our Class A Units and Class B Units pursuant to this prospectus would own 38% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding upon the closing of this offering. In such event, the total consideration paid by our existing stockholders, including the holders of these options, would be approximately $234,420,697, or 98%, the total consideration paid by the purchasers of our Class A Units and Class B Units under this prospectus would be $4,317,742, or 2%, the average price per share paid by our existing stockholders would be $51.34 and the average price per share paid by the purchasers of our Class A Units and Class B Units under this prospectus would be $1.55.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this prospectus, particularly in “Risk Factors.”

Overview

We have developed a broad portfolio of innovative intellectual property to enhance wireless communications. Our intellectual property is embedded in proprietary software algorithms that offer cognitive interference mitigation and spectrum access solutions for countless applications using commercial off the shelf devices. We recently released the commercially available version of our software and hardware products using our proprietary xMax® cognitive radio technology.

Our current cognitive radio technology is based on years of product development. In 2008 and 2009, we generated material revenues from sales of our prior BSN250 voice-only products. After the introduction of various smartphones in 2007 and later that could handle both voice and data, we decided to enhance our voice-only products to include data services. In 2011, we delivered our enhanced BSN250 base station and TX70 handset for both voice and SMS services to the U.S. Army. Given the proliferation of smartphones, the U.S. Army subsequently requested that our BSN250 base station should integrate with commercial off the shelf devices. In 2013, we introduced an improved product line that could handle both voice and data services. These new products, the Access Point (“CN1100”), formerly known as the xAP base station, the Mobile Hotspot (“CN5100”), formerly known as the xMod modem, and the Vehicle Modem (“CN3100”), formerly known as the xVM modem, are able to communicate with any wi-fi enabled commercial off the shelf device. In 2014, we began developing a new product, the CN3200 Dual Band Routing Modem (“CN3200”), formerly known as the xRM modem. On September 30, 2014, we received certification from the U.S. Federal Communications Commission in connection with the CN3200. The CN3200 is a module that complements the xMax mobile system and is designed to provide high speed fixed broadband access using frequencies at 2.4 GHz. It offers an end-user solution that seamlessly integrates xMax and wi-fi in a single device, and allows the delivery of both high data rates and reliable high-speed mobility in the same system. We believe that the CN3200 will provide higher performance with dedicated channels for voice (xMax) and data (wi-fi), will maximize user experience via interprotocol smart-routing, and provide greater reliability.

We believe that the wireless communications industry is facing a “spectrum crisis” because the demand for flexible, affordable voice and data access continues to increase rapidly while the amount of available spectrum remains relatively constant. We have developed frequency-agnostic cognitive radio solutions to address this increasing demand by eliminating the need to acquire scarce and expensive licensed radio spectrum, and thus ideally lowering the total cost of ownership for wireless broadband access. With fast-growing demand straining network capacity, our intellectual property is also designed to help wireless broadband network operators make more efficient use of their existing spectrum allocations. We are targeting sales in numerous industries worldwide, such as telecommunications services, public safety and defense, and in markets ranging from rural to urban areas as well as expeditionary deployments.

The initial implementation of our cognitive radio intellectual property is xMax. We believe the xMax system is the only commercially available cognitive radio network system that includes our interference mitigation and spatial processing technologies. xMax implements our proprietary interference mitigation software that can increase capacity on already crowded airwaves by improving interference tolerance, enabling the delivery of higher QoS than other technologies that would not be able to cope with the interference. We believe that the xMax system will also, when operating on more than one radio channel, deliver dynamic spectrum access by using our patented self-organizing network techniques. Furthermore, the xMax system can be used to provide additional capacity to licensed spectrum by identifying and utilizing unused bandwidth within the licensed spectrum.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our system is frequency agnostic, although currently designed to operate within the 902 – 928 MHz unlicensed band of spectrum. xMax serves as a mobile VoIP and broadband data system that utilizes an end-to-end IP system architecture. The xMax product and service suite includes access points, mobile switching centers, network management systems, deployment tools and proactive customer support. The xMax system will allow mobile operators to utilize free, unlicensed 902 – 928 MHz ISM band spectrum (which spectrum is available in all of the Americas except French Guiana) instead of purchasing scarce and expensive licensed spectrum. Our xMax system will also enable enterprises to set up a mobile communications network in an expeditious and cost-effective manner.

We have generated significant net losses for the past several years and we expect to continue to realize net losses for the immediate future.

We are executing on our sales and marketing strategy and have entered into direct sales agreements with end-customers and indirect sales agreements with channel network partners. These customer engagements are primarily in two of our target markets: public safety and rural telecommunications.

Results of Operations

Comparison for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014

Revenues

Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2015 were $584,000 compared to $250,000 in the corresponding period in 2014. The revenue of $584,000 resulted from $510,000 from sales of equipment and $74,000 from engineering services and a consulting services agreement during the three months ended March 31, 2015. Of the $584,000 in revenue, $480,000 was previously recorded as deferred revenue.

Cost of Revenue and Operating Expenses

Cost of Components and Personnel

Cost of components and personnel for the three months ended March 31, 2015 were $330,000 compared to $63,000 in the corresponding period in 2014. Of the $330,000, $313,000 was based on the cost of components and the time allocated to building the products sold, and $17,000 was based on the cost of the time allocated towards the engineering and consulting service agreement. Of the $63,000, $60,000 was based on the cost of components and the time allocated to building the products sold, and $3,000 was based on the cost of the time allocated towards the engineering and consulting service agreement.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses are the expenses of operating the business on a daily basis. This includes salary and benefit expenses and payroll taxes, as well as the costs of trade shows, marketing programs, promotional materials, professional services, facilities, general liability insurance, and travel. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company incurred aggregate expense of $1.6 million, compared to $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, representing a decrease of $0.1 million or 6%. The decrease is due to decreases in consulting fees associated with sales and marketing of $0.1 million; $0.1 in taxes and licenses; $0.1 million in travel expenses; and $0.1 in advertising. The decreases were partially offset by increases in consulting fees associated with the Company’s listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market of $0.3 million.

Development Expenses

Development expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefit expenses and payroll taxes, as well as costs for prototypes, facilities and travel. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company incurred aggregate expense of $1.6 million, compared to $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, representing a decrease of $0.9 million or 37%. The decrease is due to decreases of $0.3 million in materials used for research and development purposes; $0.3 million in consulting services; $0.1 million in costs related to maintaining existing patents; and $0.4 million in additional payroll capitalization. The decreases were partially offset by an increase of $0.2 million in travel expenses. We expect our development costs to decrease going forward as we implement cost saving measures in 2015 which include a reduction in our current full-time, part-time and contracted workforce.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stock Based Compensation

Stock based compensation decreased $0.08 million from $0.21 million in the three months ended March 31, 2014 to $0.13 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015. The decrease arose from the decrease in the number of outstanding options being expensed in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period in the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Amortization and Depreciation

Amortization and depreciation expenses increased $0.01 million, or 1%, from $0.95 million in the three months ended March 31, 2014 to $0.96 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Other

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $0.05 million compared to $0.05 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Net Loss

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company had a net loss of $3.5 million, as compared to a net loss of $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, or a decrease of $1.7 million. The decrease in net loss is due mainly to an increase in revenue and a decrease in development expenses discussed above.

Comparison for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

Revenue

Our revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 increased 55% from $0.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 to $0.6 million as a result of recognizing additional revenue during the fiscal year. Revenue of $423,000 resulted from sales of equipment and $205,000 resulted from an engineering and consulting services agreement.

Cost of Revenue and Operating Expenses

Cost of Components and Personnel

Cost of components and personnel was $0.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to $0.1 million in fiscal 2013. $130,000 of such costs is based on the cost of components and the time allocated to building the products sold and $26,000 is based on the cost of the time allocated towards the engineering and consulting services agreements.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses are the expenses of operating the business on a daily basis and include salary and benefit expenses and payroll taxes, as well as the costs of trade shows, marketing programs, promotional materials, professional services, facilities, general liability insurance, and travel.

General and administrative expenses increased by $2.1 million, or 38%, from $5.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 to $7.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The change is primarily due to increases of $1.1 million in salary and benefit expenses due to an increase in the number of employees; $0.8 million for the MBTH 3% cash success fee as a result of MBTH arranging financing for the Company and $0.2 million in travel related expenses.

Development

Development expenses consist primarily of salary and benefit expenses and payroll taxes, as well as costs for prototypes, facilities and travel. Development expenses increased by $2.1 million, or 39%, from $5.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 to $7.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2014.

The change is due to increases of $2.5 million in salary and benefit expenses due to the increase in the number of employees, $0.3 million in travel related expenses and $0.1 million in costs related to maintaining existing patents. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $0.9 million in research and

TABLE OF CONTENTS

development expenses. We expect our development costs to decrease going forward as we implement cost saving measures in 2015 which include a reduction in our current full-time, part-time and contracted workforce.

Stock Based Compensation

Stock based compensation decreased by $0.2 million, or 21%, from $0.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 to $0.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The change arose from a decrease in the number of outstanding options being expensed in fiscal 2014 when compared to fiscal 2013.

Amortization and Depreciation

Amortization and depreciation expenses increased by $1.5 million, or 63%, from $2.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 to $3.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase is attributed to the xMax products becoming available for sale as of September 30, 2013. As of this date, the Company began to amortize all capitalized costs associated with these products for the remainder of the year.

Other

Other income was $0.4 million and $0 for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase was the result of a reversal of a deferred liability in 2014 from a prior fiscal year.

Other expense was $0 and $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The expense for 2013 was a result of the independent directors of the Company authorizing a onetime agreement on September 30, 2013, whereby we issued to MB Technology Holdings, LLC (“MBTH”) 159,946 shares of our common stock and a warrant to purchase 136,364 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $68.70 per share for the difference in price between the shares issued to them in March 2013 at a price of $133.30 per share in exchange for the conversion of its 2011 Convertible Note and the $55.00 purchase price for shares sold in our initial public offering in July 2013. Additionally, the modified strike price, agreed upon between the Company and MBTH in January 2013, of $133.00 per share for the two options representing 57,143 underlying shares granted to MBTH in February 2011 has been lowered to $55.00.

Inducement expense was $0 and $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The inducement expense represents the estimated fair value of warrants given to non-related parties in relation with the conversion of the $7.8 million promissory note issued by us to MBTH pursuant to a subscription agreement dated January 16, 2013 (the “Bridge Loan”).

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $0.2 million compared to $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, representing a decrease of $2.0 million or 92%. The decrease was partially due to the interest and fees incurred on the Bridge Loan for 2013; $0.7 million from the six month minimum interest recorded in connection with the increase interest rate; $0.4 million from the accretion of the debt discount recorded as interest expense; and $0.6 million in interest expense resulted from the Bridge Loan being convertible into new shares at a price of $52.25, 95% of our 2013 initial public offering (the “IPO”) price of $55.00, in 2013.

Impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $0 compared to $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2013, $896,000 of our impairment charge was related to property and equipment and $37,000 was related to intangible assets.

Net Loss

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company had a net loss of $19.0 million, as compared to a net loss of $27.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $8.5 million or 31%. The decrease in net loss is due mainly to the one-time agreement with MBTH, increases of inducement expense and interest expenses for 2013 discussed above.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had positive working capital of approximately $2.3 million including $0.6 million of restricted cash, $0.2 million of cash and cash equivalents. We have incurred net losses of $3.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and $19.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2014. Additionally, we have incurred negative operating cash flows including cash used in operations of $1.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and cash used in operations of $14.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Our operations primarily have been funded through cash generated by debt and equity financing. Cash comprises cash in hand and demand deposits. Our cash balances were as follows:

		March 31,				December 31,
		2015 $’000				2014 $’000
Cash			221				758

During 2014, the Company relied upon additional investment through proceeds from a registered public offering in April 2014 and through the financings off of our Shelf Registration Statement in the third and fourth fiscal quarters as further described below. During 2013, the Company relied upon additional investment through proceeds from the IPO, our 2013 public offering, Bridge Loan and convertible notes payable. The Company will be dependent on new debt or equity financing to fund future operations.

The Company does not currently have sufficient capital in order to fund operations for the next twelve months from the balance sheet date or to achieve cash flow breakeven. Our future capital requirements may vary materially from those currently planned and will depend on many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, the timing of new product introductions, market acceptance of our products and overall economic conditions. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise additional capital, obtain other means of financing, and to fulfill purchase orders. The ability to recognize revenue and ultimately cash receipts, on purchase orders is contingent upon, but not limited to, acceptable performance of the delivered equipment and services.

Cash Flows

Comparison for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014

The following table sets forth the major components of our statements of cash flows data for the periods presented.

For the Three Month Period Ended
(In Thousands)

		March 31, 2015				March 31, 2014
Cash flows used in Operations		$	(1,824	)		$	(4,523	)
Investing Activities		$	(755	)		$	(277	)
Financing Activities		$	2,042			$	31
Cash at end of period		$	221			$	686

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Comparison for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

The following table sets forth the major components of our statements of cash flows data for the periods presented.

		Year Ended December 31, 2014 $’000				Year Ended December 31, 2013 $’000
Net cash used in operating activities			(14,619	)			(14,395	)
Net cash used in investment activities			(1,905	)			(2,896	)
Net cash inflow from financing activities			11,765				22,537
Net (decrease) increase in cash			(4,759	)			5,246

Operating Activities

Comparison for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014

Net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2015 totaled $1.8 million as compared to $4.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Of the $1.8 million, approximately $0.5 million was related to the increase of our payables and the remaining balance consisted principally of the net loss from operations.

Comparison for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2014 totaled $14.6 million as compared to $14.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Of the $14.6 million, approximately $1.7 million was related to the increase of our inventory, $1.9 million was the increase in due to related parties, $1.0 million to the reduction of our payables and $0.3 million from the increase in accrued expense and the remaining consisted principally of the net loss from operations.

Investing Activities

Comparison for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014

Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $0.8 million as compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. This represents capital expenditures primarily associated with the investment in product and technology development and our patent portfolio.

Comparison for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $1.9 million as compared to $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. This represents capital expenditures primarily associated with the investment in product and technology development and our patent portfolio.

We have invested in product and technology development and our patent portfolio, with $1.8 million accounted for as investment in intangible assets in the year ended December 31, 2014, and $2.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2013. In addition, the Company’s investment in property and equipment, comprising the purchase of testing and manufacturing equipment, of $0.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased by $0.2 million, or 54%, from $0.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2013.

Financing Activities

Comparison for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014

Our net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $2.0 million as compared to cash provided by financing activities of $0.03 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, there were cash inflows of $2.7 million which were partially offset by the increase in restricted cash of $0.6 million. In the three months ended March 31, 2015 there were net proceeds from the Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock totaling $2.7 million.

Comparison for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

Our net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $11.8 million as compared to $22.5 million for 2013. The proceeds of $11.8 million in 2014 primarily consisted of proceeds

TABLE OF CONTENTS

from the issuance of common and preferred stock. During 2014, the Company raised $8.8 million through the third offering; $1.0 million from the $1 million purchase agreement; $1.3 million from various investors through financing under our S-3 registration statement; and $0.7 million through the sale of convertible preferred stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the proceeds of $22.5 million in 2013 primarily consisted of further advances under convertible promissory notes issued by the Company and proceeds from issuance of common stock. During 2013, the Company raised $7.8 million through the IPO and IPO over-allotment, $9.6 million through the November 2013 offering and related partial over-allotment, drew down $5.0 million under the Bridge Loan and $0.5 million under the convertible notes payable to related party. Also note holders converted the May 2011 shareholders note of $15 million and the Bridge Loan of $11.4 million during 2013.

2014 and 2015 Financings

April 2014 Offering

On April 22, 2014, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of 526,500 shares of common stock, at a purchase price to the public of $19.00 per share, for net proceeds to the Company, after deducting underwriter discounts and offering expenses, of $8,816,000. Roth Capital Partners, LLC and Feltl and Company acted as underwriters for the offering.

Purchase Agreements and Registration Rights Agreement with Lincoln Park

$1,000,000 Purchase Agreement

On September 22, 2014, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund (“Lincoln Park”), pursuant to which we offered 50,000 shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park at a price of $20.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $961,000 net of expenses. The closing of the transaction occurred on September 24, 2014. The Company issued the 50,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3 that was declared effective on August 31, 2014 (the “Shelf Registration Statement”).

$15,000,000 Purchase Agreement

On September 19, 2014, we entered into a Purchase Agreement (the “$15M Purchase Agreement”) and a registration rights agreement with Lincoln Park. In consideration for entering into the transaction, we issued 17,500 shares of our common stock to Lincoln Park as a commitment fee upon execution of the $15M Purchase Agreement. We recorded $346,000 as a prepaid expense based upon a stock price of $19.80 on the date of issuance. Lincoln Park also agreed to purchase up to $15,000,000 of our shares of common stock over the 24-month term of the $15M Purchase Agreement.

The $15M Purchase Agreement provides that, from time to time over the term of the $15M Purchase Agreement, on any business day, as often as every other business day, and at our sole discretion, we may require Lincoln Park to purchase up to 10,000 shares of our common stock (a “Regular Purchase”); provided, however, that (i) a Regular Purchase may be increased to up to 15,000 shares of our common stock provided that the closing sale price of our common stock is not below $20.00 on the purchase date, (ii) a Regular Purchase may be increased to up to 20,000 shares of our common stock provided that the closing sale price of our common stock is not below $25.00 on the purchase date and (iii) a Regular Purchase may be increased to up to 25,000 shares of our common stock provided that the closing sale price of our common stock is not below $30.00 on the purchase date; and provided, further, that the aggregate price of any Regular Purchase shall not exceed $1,000,000. We may not sell any shares of our common stock as a Regular Purchase on a date in which the closing sale price of our common stock is below $15.00. The purchase price for Regular Purchases shall be equal to the lesser of (i) the lowest sale price of our common stock on the purchase date and (ii) the average of the three (3) lowest closing sale prices of our common stock during the ten (10) business days prior to the purchase date, as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market.

We also have the right, at our sole discretion, to require Lincoln Park to make an accelerated purchase on the business day following the purchase date of a Regular Purchase in an amount up to the lesser of (i) 200% of the number of shares of common stock purchased as a Regular Purchase and (ii) 30% of the trading volume of our common stock on such accelerated purchase date, provided that the closing price of our

TABLE OF CONTENTS

common stock equals or exceeds $15.00 on such accelerated purchase date, as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market. The purchase price per share of common stock for any accelerated purchase will be equal to the lesser of (i) the closing sale price of our common stock on the accelerated purchase date and (ii) 95% of the volume weighted average price of our common stock on the accelerated purchase date.

On October 3, 2014, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC to register for resale by Lincoln Park 478,291 shares of the Company’s common stock issuable to Lincoln Park under the $15M Purchase Agreement and the 17,500 shares of common stock issued to Lincoln Park as a commitment fee. On October 20, 2014, the SEC declared this registration statement effective.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company has drawn down $145,000 and issued 10,000 shares of common stock under the $15M Purchase Agreement. The prepaid expense for this financing was $249,000 as of March 31, 2015, representing a decrease of $97,000 from the initial recording of $346,000. The Company is amortizing the prepaid balance to additional paid in capital on a straight line basis over the term of the agreement.

On May 14, 2015, we provided written notice to Lincoln Park of our election to terminate the $15M Purchase Agreement effective May 15, 2015. On May 18, 2015, we filed a Post-Effective Amendment (the “Post-Effective Amendment”) to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 that was filed in connection with the $15M Purchase Agreement. The Post-Effective Amendment, which was declared effective by the SEC on May 19, 2015, was filed to deregister 485,791 unsold shares of common stock in the offering.

$1,331,500 Purchase Agreement

On November 25, 2014, the Company entered into a purchase agreement, pursuant to which the Company sold to Lincoln Park, certain officers and directors of the Company (the “Affiliate Purchasers”) and certain other investors (the “Other Investors”) an aggregate of $1,331,500 of the Company’s common stock. The Company received net proceeds of $1,311,500 after deducting $20,000 in expenses associated with the purchase agreement. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, Lincoln Park purchased 50,000 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $12.50 per share, the Affiliate Purchasers purchased 24,599 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $13.70 per share and the Other Investors purchased 29,560 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $12.50 per share pursuant to the Company’s Shelf Registration Statement.

Equity Distribution Agreement with Roth Capital Partners, LLC

On November 18, 2014, we entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement (the “Equity Distribution Agreement”) with Roth Capital Partners, LLC (“Roth”), pursuant to which we may sell from time to time up to $10,000,000 of shares of our common stock (the “Shares”), through Roth (the “Offering”). The Equity Distribution Agreement was amended on December 29, 2014 to change the amount of the Offering to up to $1,000,000. Effective February 23, 2015, we terminated the Equity Distribution Agreement with Roth.

$750,000 Purchase Agreement — Series A Preferred Stock

On December 30, 2014, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with 31 Group, LLC (“31 Group”) pursuant to which we sold to 31 Group, for a purchase price of $750,000, 750,000 shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.00001 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) and warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase 37,500 shares of our common stock. We also issued to 31 Group 3,315 shares of our common stock in consideration of 31 Group’s execution and delivery of the Purchase Agreement (the “Commitment Shares”). The offer and sale of the Series A Preferred Stock, the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock and the Commitment Shares were made pursuant to the Shelf Registration Statement.

As of March 31, 2015, 750,000 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock and 52,500 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock issued as dividends have been converted into 239,247 shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2015, all outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock have been fully converted.

The Warrants are exercisable immediately for a period of five years from their issue date. The initial exercise price of the Warrants was $20.00 per share. Effective as of June 11, 2015, the warrants were amended to lower the exercise price from $20.00 per share to $11.50 per share. The exercise price for the Warrants is subject to adjustment upon certain events, such as stock splits, combinations, dividends,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

distributions, reclassifications, mergers or other corporate change and dilutive issuances. Upon certain fundamental events, the warrants could be redeemed by the holders of the warrants at fair market value estimated using Black Scholes.

Short Term Related Party Loans

On December 30, 2014, the Company received a $245,000 loan from George Schmitt, Chairman of the Board and, effective as of February 17, 2015, Chief Executive Officer. This amount was recorded as a due to related parties on the financial statements.

On January 8, 2015, the Company repaid $100,000 of the $245,000 due to related party balance owed to George Schmitt.

On January 29, 2015 and February 13, 2015, the Company received an aggregate of $700,000 from certain family members of George Schmitt, Chairman of the Board and, effective as of February 17, 2015, Chief Executive Officer. This amount was recorded as a short term loan in due to related parties. On February 23, 2015, George Schmitt transferred the balance of his $145,000 loan to certain family members bringing the total the Company owed to certain family members to $845,000. The $845,000 loan was settled through the issuance of 845,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, 5,310 shares of common stock and warrants with respect to 42,250 underlying shares of common stock exercisable for five years at a price of $20.00 per share. Upon certain fundamental events, the warrants could be redeemed by the holders of the warrants at fair market value estimated using Black Scholes.

$350,000 Purchase Agreement with 31 Group — Series B Preferred Stock

On February 11, 2015, the Company entered into a purchase agreement, pursuant to which the Company sold to 31 Group, 350,000 shares of the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.00001 per share (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) and warrants to purchase 17,500 shares of the Company’s common stock for a purchase price of $350,000. The Company also issued 2,462 shares of its common stock in consideration of 31 Group’s execution and delivery of the purchase agreement (the “Series B Commitment Shares”). The Series B Preferred Stock and the Series B Commitment Shares were issued pursuant to the Company’s Shelf Registration Statement.

As of August 11, 2015, 1,195,000 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock and 83,650 of the Series B Preferred Stock issued as dividends have been converted into 405,499 shares of our common stock. As of August 11, 2015, all outstanding shares of the Series B Preferred Stock have been fully converted.

Warrants

The warrants are exercisable immediately for a period of five years from their issue date. The initial exercise price with respect to the warrants was $20.00 per share. Effective as of June 11, 2015, the warrants were amended to lower the exercise price from $20.00 per share to $11.50 per share. The exercise price for the warrants is subject to adjustment upon certain events, such as stock splits, combinations, dividends, distributions, reclassifications, mergers or other corporate change and dilutive issuances. Upon certain fundamental events, the warrants could be redeemed by the holders of the warrants at fair market value estimated using Black Scholes.

$1,800,000 Purchase Agreement — Series C Preferred Stock

On February 24, 2015, the Company entered into a purchase agreement, pursuant to which the Company sold to institutional investors, 1,800,000 shares of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock, par value $0.00001 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”) and warrants to purchase 90,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for a purchase price of $1,800,000. The Company also issued 11,864 shares of its common stock in consideration of the investors’ execution and delivery of the purchase agreement (the “Series C Commitment Shares”). The Series C Preferred Stock and the Series C Commitment Shares were issued pursuant to the Company’s Shelf Registration Statement.

As of August 11, 2015, 1,800,000 shares of the Series C Preferred Stock and 126,000 of the Series C Preferred Stock issued as dividends have been converted into 946,518 shares of our common stock. As of August 11, 2015, all outstanding shares of the Series C Preferred Stock have been fully converted.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Warrants

The warrants are exercisable immediately for a period of five years from their issue date. The initial exercise price with respect to the warrants was $20.00 per share. Effective as of June 11, 2015, the warrants were amended to lower the exercise price from $20.00 per share to $11.50 per share. The exercise price for the warrants is subject to adjustment upon certain events, such as stock splits, combinations, dividends, distributions, reclassifications, mergers or other corporate change and dilutive issuances. Upon certain fundamental events, the warrants could be redeemed by the holders of the warrants at fair market value estimated using Black Scholes.

Subsequent Events

Reverse Stock Split

On July 17, 2015, we effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock.

Shares Issued Under S-8 Registration Statements

From April 15, 2015 to August 11, 2015, the Company issued 410,660 shares of common stock to employees and consultants in lieu of paying $1,072,909 in payroll and consulting services.

Short-Term Loan

From April 1, 2015 to August 11, 2015, the Company received a total of $1,010,000 from George Schmitt, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The amount was recorded due to related parties.

8% Convertible Notes

Overview.  On June 11, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (“June 2015 Purchase Agreement”) with a group of accredited investors pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of $1,166,666 in principal amount of the 8% Convertible Notes for an aggregate purchase price of $1,050,000 (the “First Tranche”). The Company received net proceeds of $907,500 from the sale of the 8% Convertible Notes after deducting placement agent fees and other expenses. On July 14, 2015, the Company and the investors entered into an amendment to the June 2015 Purchase Agreement (the “Amendment”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue an additional $466,667 in principal amount of 8% Convertible Notes for a purchase price of $420,000 (the “Second Tranche”) for total net proceeds to the Company of $400,000.

Maturity and Interest.  The First Tranche of 8% Convertible Notes will mature on December 11, 2015, and the Second Tranche of 8% Convertible Notes will mature on January 14, 2016 (each, a “Maturity Date”), less any amounts converted or redeemed prior to the Maturity Date. If the 8% Convertible Notes are not repaid by the Company by the Maturity Date, the Maturity Date shall be automatically extended for an additional three-month period until March 11, 2016 and April 14, 2016 for the First Tranche and Second Tranche, respectively (such period, the “Extension Period”), which extension shall not be considered an event of default. The 8% Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 8% per annum, subject to increase to the lesser of 24% per annum or the maximum rate permitted under applicable law upon the occurrence of certain events of default.

Conversion.  The 8% Convertible Notes are convertible at any time, in whole or in part, at the option of the holders into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $5.00 per share, which is subject to adjustment for stock dividends, stock splits, combinations or similar events. However, during the Extension Period, the conversion price shall be the lesser of (i) $5.00, subject to adjustment for stock dividends, stock splits, combinations or similar events, and (ii) 85% of the lowest closing price of the common stock in the twenty (20) trading days prior to the date of conversion.

Prepayments and Redemptions.  The Company may prepay in cash any portion of the principal amount of the 8% Convertible Notes and any accrued and unpaid interest. If such prepayment is made within sixty (60) days after the issuance date of the 8% Convertible Notes, the Company shall pay an amount in cash equal to 125% of the sum of the then outstanding principal amount of the note and interest; thereafter, if such prepayment is made, the Company shall pay an amount in cash equal to 135% of the sum of the then outstanding principal amount of the note and interest. Within one (1) business day after the closing of any

TABLE OF CONTENTS

underwritten public offering of at least $7,000,000 of securities of the Company pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 or Form S-3 (the “Public Offering”), the Company shall prepay in cash an amount equal to (i) 125% of the sum of the then outstanding principal amount of the note and interest if the closing of the Public Offering occurs within sixty (60) days after the issuance date of the 8% Convertible Notes or (ii) 135% of the sum of the then outstanding principal amount of the note and interest if the closing of the Public Offering occurs after sixty (60) days following the issuance date of the 8% Convertible Notes.

Right to Participate in Future Financings.  For so long as the 8% Convertible Notes are outstanding, the holder has a right to participate in any issuance of the Company’s common stock, common stock equivalents or a combination of units thereof in an underwritten public offering (a “Subsequent Financing”), in an aggregate amount of the Subsequent Financing equal to at least $500,000, on the same terms, conditions and price provided for in the Subsequent Financing.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to our stockholders.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or JOBS Act. We will remain an emerging growth company for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenue exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period. Pursuant to Section 107 of the JOBS Act, we have elected to utilize the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards.

The Company does not believe that recently issued accounting pronouncements will have a material impact on its financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Critical accounting estimates are those that management deems to be most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, due to the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. We have identified our critical accounting estimates which are discussed below.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BUSINESS

Overview

We have developed a broad portfolio of innovative intellectual property to enhance wireless communications. Our intellectual property is embedded in proprietary software algorithms that offer cognitive interference mitigation and spectrum access solutions for countless applications using commercial off the shelf devices. We recently released the commercially available version of our software and hardware products using our proprietary xMax cognitive radio technology.

Our current cognitive radio technology is based on years of product development. In 2008 and 2009, we generated material revenues from sales of our prior BSN250 voice-only products. After the introduction of various smartphones in 2007 and later that could handle both voice and data, we decided to enhance our voice-only products to include data services. In 2011, we delivered our enhanced BSN250 base station and TX70 handset for both voice and SMS services to the U.S. Army. Given the proliferation of smartphones, the U.S. Army subsequently requested that our BSN250 base station should integrate with commercial off the shelf devices. In 2013, we introduced an improved product line that could handle both voice and data services. These new products, the Access Point (“CN1100”), formerly known as the xAP base station, the Mobile Hotspot (“CN5100”), formerly known as the xMod modem, and the Vehicle Modem (“CN3100”), formerly known as the xVM modem, are able to communicate with any wi-fi enabled commercial off the shelf device. We have generated significant net losses for the past several years and we expect to continue to realize net losses for the immediate future. We estimate that we will begin generating revenues sufficient to cover the cost of our operations in late 2015.

We believe that the wireless communications industry is facing a “spectrum crisis” because the demand for flexible, affordable voice and data access continues to increase rapidly while the amount of available spectrum remains relatively constant. We have developed frequency-agnostic cognitive radio solutions to address this increasing demand by eliminating the need to acquire scarce and expensive licensed radio spectrum, and thus ideally lowering the total cost of ownership for wireless broadband access. With fast-growing demand straining network capacity, our intellectual property is also designed to help wireless broadband network operators make more efficient use of their existing spectrum allocations. We are targeting sales in numerous industries worldwide, such as telecommunications services, public safety and defense, and in markets ranging from rural to urban areas as well as expeditionary deployments.

The initial implementation of our cognitive radio intellectual property is xMax. We believe the xMax system is the only commercially available cognitive radio network system that includes our interference mitigation and spatial processing technologies. xMax implements our proprietary interference mitigation software that can increase capacity on already crowded airwaves by improving interference tolerance, enabling the delivery of higher Quality of Service (“QoS”) than other technologies that would not be able to cope with the interference. We believe that the xMax system will also, when operating on more than one radio channel, deliver dynamic spectrum access by using our patented self-organizing network techniques. Furthermore, the xMax system can be used to provide additional capacity to licensed spectrum by identifying and utilizing unused bandwidth within the licensed spectrum. Our system is frequency agnostic, although currently designed to operate within the 902 – 928 MHz unlicensed band of spectrum. xMax serves as a mobile voice over internet protocol (“VoIP”) and broadband data system that utilizes an end-to-end Internet Protocol (“IP”) system architecture. The xMax product and service suite includes access points, mobile switching centers, network management systems, deployment tools and proactive customer support. The xMax system will allow mobile operators to utilize free, unlicensed 902 – 928 MHz ISM band spectrum (which spectrum is available in all of the Americas except French Guiana) instead of purchasing scarce and expensive licensed spectrum. Our xMax system will also enable enterprises to set up a mobile communications network in an expeditious and cost-effective manner.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Below is a diagram that provides a high-level overview of the xMax® network architecture:

We are executing on our sales and marketing strategy and have entered into direct sales agreements with end-customers and indirect sales agreements with channel network partners. These customer engagements are primarily in two of our target markets: public safety and rural telecommunications.

As of the date of this prospectus, 23.36% of the shares of our common stock are beneficially owned by MBTH. MBTH was co-founded in 2010 by Rick Mooers, Roger Branton and George Schmitt in order to invest in, and provide expertise, guidance and other support to, us. Roger Branton, our Chief Financial Officer, and George Schmitt, our Executive Chairman, are directors of MBTH, and Richard Mooers, a director of our Company, is the CEO and a director of MBTH. MB Merchant Group, LLC (“MBMG”), a merchant bank owned by family entities or trusts related to Richard Mooers and Roger Branton, has a 45.85% ownership interest in MBTH as of August 11, 2015. George Schmitt has a direct 36.84% ownership interest in MBTH as of August 11, 2015, and has been granted an option to purchase MBTH shares sufficient to give him an additional 5% ownership interest in MBTH. Since its founding, MBTH has provided xG Technology with significant financial and other support, including $7.8 million of indebtedness under the promissory note issued by us to MBTH pursuant to a subscription agreement dated January 16, 2013 (together, the “Bridge Loan”). On July 18, 2013, MBTH, along with other investors, exchanged the outstanding Bridge Loan for 218,753 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 109,378 shares, in full satisfaction of the Bridge Loan. We agreed to award MBTH a 3% cash success fee if MBTH arranges financing for the Company or arranges a merger, consolidation or sale by the Company of substantially all of the assets. On February 24, 2015, MBTH invoiced the Company for $700,000 in fees associated with equity financings through April 16, 2014 at a rate of 3% per financing less certain discounts. The Company also accrued for an additional fee of approximately $109,000 for equity financings between April 17, 2014 and December 31, 2014. The balance of $809,000 was recorded as an expense in general and administrative expenses and included in due to related parties. On February 24, 2015, we issued 399,114 shares of common stock to MBTH in consideration of converting $1,756,098 owed of the balance due to related parties. For further details on the financial support given by MBTH to us and other transactions and arrangements between us and MBTH, please see the section entitled “Related Party Transactions — Other Transactions”.

Our Strengths

We believe the following strengths position us for sustainable growth:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Strategy

We are developing a broad portfolio of innovative intellectual property that we believe will enhance wireless communications. Leveraging elements of this intellectual property portfolio, we plan to introduce a range of spectrum agnostic, cognitive radio solutions for numerous industries and applications. We believe that sales of these products and services, together with our ability to leverage our patent portfolio, present us with an attractive revenue model. Our current strategy is to commercialize our intellectual property portfolio by developing and selling network products using our proprietary software algorithms to offer cognitive interference mitigation and spectrum access solutions. Our future strategies are for our intellectual property to be embedded by partners in a semiconductor chip that could be sold to third-party equipment manufacturers and inserted in their devices, and to license our intellectual property to other customers in industry verticals world-wide.

Market Overview

Our Market

We are witnessing rapidly increasing demand in the marketplace for mobile bandwidth. The surge in demand is attributable to the proliferation of smartphones, tablet PCs and other broadband-centric devices, as well as the shift to data and video-intensive services. A Cisco report (the Cisco Visual Networking Index, February 2012) indicates that in 2011 more than 50% of the data traffic on mobile networks was video, and the report forecasts video traffic to account for over 70% of total mobile data traffic by 2016.

There has also been an increase in mobile voice demand as more people unplug their wired phones and rely on wireless devices for all of their calling needs. According to Cisco’s report, as well as several studies undertaken by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), the demand for wireless services will continue to grow in the coming years, as shown in the chart below. Cisco predicts mobile data traffic will increase 11-fold between 2013 and 2018, a 61% CAGR, reaching 15.9 Exabytes per month.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Source: Mobile Broadband: The Benefits of Additional Spectrum (FCC Report 10/2010)

In early 2009, Congress directed the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to develop a National Broadband Plan to ensure every American has “access to broadband capability.” After conducting thirty-six public workshops and engaging in significant collaboration and conversations with other government agencies and Congress, the FCC released the National Broadband Plan in early 2010. Within the Plan the FCC acknowledges that “the current spectrum policy framework sometimes impedes the free flow of spectrum to its most highly valued uses.” The Plan states that “Wireless broadband is poised to become a key platform for innovation in the U.S. over the next decade. As a result, U.S. spectrum policy requires reform to accommodate the new ways that industry is delivering wireless services. These reforms include making more spectrum available on a flexible basis, including for unlicensed and opportunistic uses.”

Specific recommendations within the report that indicate a favorable regulatory environment for cognitive radio technology include: “Recommendation 5.13: The FCC should spur further development and deployment of opportunistic uses across more radio spectrum.” The Plan further states that, “the FCC and NTIA should take steps to expand the environment in which new, opportunistic technologies can be developed and improved. And “The FCC should allow opportunistic radios to operate on spectrum currently held by the FCC (such as in certain license areas where spectrum was not successfully auctioned).”

On March 27, 2012 the U.S. Department of Commerce, through the NTIA, released a report in which they announced, “In the past, the federal government has freed up spectrum for exclusive commercial use by clearing a spectrum band of federal users, who typically relocated to other bands. However, given the growing demand for spectrum by both industry and the federal agencies, it is increasingly difficult to find desirable spectrum that can be vacated by federal users as well as spectrum in which to relocate these federal users. Due to the scarcity of spectrum, the complexity of federal operations, and the time and cost of relocating federal users, the old approach alone is no longer feasible.”

The report further states “NTIA proposes a new path forward for spectrum repurposing that relies on a combination of relocating federal users and sharing spectrum between federal agencies and commercial users. Spectrum sharing will be a vital component to satisfying the growing demand for spectrum, and federal and non-federal users will need to adopt innovative spectrum-sharing techniques to accommodate this demand.”

In July 2012, The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) issued a report to the US President titled “Realizing the Full Potential of Government-Held Spectrum to Spur Economic Growth” in which “It concludes that the traditional practice of clearing government-held spectrum of Federal users and auctioning it for commercial use is not sustainable. In light of changes made possible by modern technology, we recommend that you issue a new Memorandum that states it is the policy of the U.S. government to share underutilized spectrum to the maximum extent consistent with the Federal mission, and requires the Secretary of Commerce to identify 1,000 MHz of Federal spectrum in which to implement shared-use spectrum pilot projects.” The report noted that simply clearing and reallocating spectrum would

TABLE OF CONTENTS

not be sustainable and pointed to a recent study by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) which found that clearing of just one 95 MHz band will take 10 years, cost $18 billion, and cause significant disruption. Among its key recommendations are to adopt new technologies, including cognitive radios, that could help use existing spectrum more efficiently, stating that “the use of new radio technologies, including cognitive radios, will be an important tool in helping increase spectrum capacity and utilization”. The PCAST authors stated that agile (cognitive) radio technologies that make it possible for computerized radio systems to share spectrum on a vastly more efficient basis would make it possible to move from an era of scarcity to one of abundance.

Moreover, on July 6, 2012 a Presidential Executive Order was issued regarding the Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions. The order establishes that the federal government must be able to communicate with the public, other agencies, other levels of government and businesses “at all times and circumstances” and in all locations, both domestically and internationally. To ensure this, the order mandates the establishment of emergency communications capabilities that are “survivable, resilient, enduring and effective”. These capabilities are not available in traditional public system networks, but the xMax® cognitive radio system has been designed from the ground up to meet the very survivability, redundancy, mobility, interoperability, and resiliency requirements specified by this Order.

Recognizing the spectrum constraints on fast growing needs for wireless connectivity, in September 2012 the European Commission published a communication promoting the shared use of radio spectrum resources. A study conducted for the European Commission showed that finding additional shared spectrum resources for wireless broadband could create significant net economic benefits for the European Union. With an increase of between 200 to 400 MHz in shared access spectrum for wireless broadband, the scenarios evaluated in the study showed a net increase in the value to the European economy of the order of several hundred billion Euros by 2020. The Commission, therefore, proposed steps to foster the development of wireless innovations in the EU to ensure that the currently allocated spectrum is exploited to the fullest extent possible. This has been followed by Ofcom, the telecommunications regulator in the UK, moving to complete the process to release TV Whites Spaces for shared use.

While it appears to management that spectrum regulation is developing in a favorable manner, we have, nonetheless, chosen to release the initial xMax® product line on the unlicensed 900 MHz ISM band (902 – 928 MHz) in order to minimize our exposure to regulatory risk (see further under the section entitled “Government Regulations, Regulators’ Role in spectrum”). The unlicensed bands are well established and although these bands are allocated for Industrial Scientific and Medical (ISM) use (e.g., microwave ovens and industrial equipment), a major use has been unlicensed (Part 15) systems such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and ZigBee. In the period 1995 – 2005, most of the cordless phones marketed in the US were in the 902 – 928 MHz band, but conflicts with the other uses and availability of DECT equipment has greatly decreased sales of 902 – 928 MHz cordless phones.

The rules for these bands sprung from FCC Docket 81-413 which sought to end an implicit prohibition of spread spectrum/CDMA technology that resulted from a focus on FDMA spectrum uses. This resulted in rules adopted in 1985 that allow unlicensed spread spectrum systems to use these bands for almost any possible application subject to a 1W power limit. When wireless LAN use became of interest several years later, these time-tested rules allowed U.S. market access without FCC deliberations. The 2.4 and 5.8 GHz bands are used for Wi-Fi today. In a similar fashion, we are launching our initial software-defined product offering programmed to operate on unlicensed spectrum in order to speed commercialization of our intellectual property without requiring FCC or NTIA deliberations on opportunistic access. Because we have designed our core technology to be usable beyond the unlicensed band that its initial product offering operates on, we believes that we are well positioned to benefit from possible future regulatory reforms that support wider spread use of spectrum sharing and opportunistic access techniques.

The growth of wireless data over the past few years has made the subject of available spectrum a pressing priority. In fact, the current situation has been referred to as a “looming spectrum crisis”. (FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, speech to CTIA, October 2009). Responses to this “crisis” have included lobbying efforts to persuade the FCC to find new sources of licensed spectrum and proposals to reallocate existing licensed spectrum. Demand for more spectrum and capacity has also been a key factor in industry

TABLE OF CONTENTS

consolidation. The rationale given for the AT&T/Cingular merger was based on the fact that AT&T had more spectrum than Cingular, and by combining the companies they could more efficiently serve their customers. Likewise, Verizon’s $3.6 billion bidding to buy unused wireless spectrum and AT&T’S $39 billion attempt to acquire T-Mobile was primarily driven by AT&T’s desire to secure additional spectrum and cell sites in order to provide more capacity across its network.

Our company and our technology and products are based on our belief that there is insufficient spectrum available to satisfy the current and future growth of wireless data. However, we also believe that this crisis is not solely a result of insufficient amounts of available spectrum, but also the result of inefficient use of the currently available spectrum. Rather than merely demanding more spectrum we believe that the more appropriate response to the call for increased bandwidth would be to shift the focus to getting more use out of spectrum that has already been allocated. More effective utilization of the available spectrum can be accomplished in a number of different ways. Advancements in radio technology, such as the movement to the LTE standard from the previous 3G networks, for example, have allowed for better spectrum utilization. This has been attributed to the incorporation of new advanced technologies such as multiple in, multiple out (“MIMO”) and Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiple to reduce multiuser interference.

Other methods being employed by network operators to meet bandwidth requirements have included off-loading some of the demand to unlicensed Wi-Fi hotspots and selling in-building femtocells that make use of a customer’s own wired Internet connection. Another approach is to build more cell sites closer together. Each cell site would cover a smaller area, and thus offer the ability to reuse frequencies more times in a larger geographic coverage area. However, such would entail more costs, and is time consuming due to local permitting and other considerations. Many of these approaches have been driven by the need to receive more capacity out of limited spectrum.

While the spectrum currently available cannot satisfy the future growth of wireless data, the idea of getting better use out of spectrum (both licensed and unlicensed) by sharing it is receiving increased attention as a more effective and efficient solution for the industry than simply identifying new spectrum. This has led to industry and policy makers to consider technology-based approaches, such as cognitive radio and opportunistic (i.e. shared) spectrum use.

Users of commercial cellular networks are not the only users that are running out of capacity due to spectrum limitations. Wireless users around the globe such as industrial and enterprise users, public safety agencies and those who use unlicensed spectrum (such as Wi-Fi and White Spaces) are also lacking necessary spectrum, but are not being allocated the necessary spectrum due to the fact that regulators have historically prioritized commercial mobile carriers in the allocation of spectrum assets as the demand for both voice and broadband access continues to increase.

We believe that deployment of cognitive radio networks offers the best solution to addressing the pressing need for more efficient use of spectrum.

Radio Spectrum — A Primer

Radio spectrum is a finite resource. In order to utilize this limited radio spectrum better, we have essentially been limited to reallocating swaths held by existing users, who either have to lose some of their spectrum or have to move to other portions of the band.

The best spectrum for two-way radio or cellular types of communications is in lower frequencies. These frequencies are scarce due to technical, historical, and regulatory reasons. A large part of the spectrum (30MHz to 900MHz) that is well suited for cellular and land mobile radio (“LMR”) is occupied by existing business, industrial, public safety, and other license holders. Additionally, only a fraction of this spectrum is practical for mobile commercial consumption as the usage of lower frequencies requires antennas, filters and other components that do not fit into a portable handheld device. There are also many services that have long used valuable spectrum in frequencies that could be reassigned for mobile data and voice since those services could use some other spectrum efficiently.

The availability of widespread high-speed wireless broadband has led to customer uptake that was far greater than the network operators, device manufacturers, and application developers had predicted. The introduction of the iPhone by Apple was a starting point for soaring broadband wireless service demand, and

TABLE OF CONTENTS

since that time, new applications, including streaming video for TV and movie services, have proliferated. Network operators are struggling with how to keep up with this demand. AT&T reported that 4% of its iPhone customers were accounting for more than 50% of the data traffic on its 3G network, and a Cisco report indicates that today more than 50% of the data traffic on mobile networks is video. This trend is expected to accelerate as network operators begin deploying 4G (fourth-generation cellular services). However, 4G does not fully address the current spectrum issues, and in fact may make it worse as new bandwidth and spectrum-intensive services are brought to market.

Cognitive Radio Networks — A Primer

The industry definition of a cognitive radio is a device that, unlike a traditional radio, can dynamically find and use available frequency to improve throughput and connectivity. This can be done via real-time sensing that allows the radio to scan for unused frequencies and then instantly tune to such frequencies. Cognitive radios can also rely on a database that can tell it what channels are available (usually based on the radio’s location and known spectrum restrictions in that area).

Either or both of these techniques can be used to help the cognitive radio avoid interference and optimize its throughput and connection reliability on a dynamic basis. With detailed information about its local radio frequency (“RF”) environment, cognitive radios are able to change power output, frequency and receive or transmit parameters, in order to extract latent (unused) bandwidth and capacity from crowded unlicensed, as well as underutilized licensed, wireless spectrum.

The key elements of cognitive radio technology include spectrum sensing, spectrum management, spectrum mobility, spectrum sharing, and spatial processing:

Spectrum sensing may be defined as interference-based detection of transmitters with the ability to look at a portion of the spectrum to see if it contains any transmitters that could cause interference to the cognitive radio system. Making the end user devices and network infrastructure cognitive enables both to dynamically react to a wide range of conditions. In the xMax® system, the end user radio is used to inform the network of changes in the RF environment, core infrastructure and other relevant conditions. This allows the network itself, and not just the radios, to adapt dynamically. When only the radio itself is cognitive, each radio will individually optimize its parameters and throughput based on local conditions, without regard to overall system performance. What may be optimal for the radios on an individual basis may not lead to overall network optimization in terms of coverage, throughput or other measures.

Spectrum management is the ability of the system to capture the best available spectrum for use at any given point in time. It is based on the premise that both terminals and base stations can be directed to change their operating frequencies dynamically as needed to keep the communications from interfering with others in that portion of the spectrum, or of being interfered with by others in the same spectrum. By propagating and collecting data from individual radios across the network, a cognitive system approach can make the entire network smarter, and optimize total network throughput. This enables new and useful features such as self-RF planning that can simplify, and reduce the cost of, the deployment and operation of the network. After the RF data is collected, better utilization and performance can be achieved automatically and continuously. This makes the network vastly more adaptable, self-sustaining and self-optimizing in many ways. The ability for the network to provide a level of self-RF planning is only one example of what a cognitive network can offer. Because a cognitive radio network can self-optimize and self-configure, little-to-no frequency coordination between cognitive radio nodes or other radio networks operating in the same frequencies is needed. This leads to an often overlooked benefit of having a self-planning, self-optimizing network: it reduces or eliminates the need for skilled radio technicians. These cognitive radio networks use software, powerful on-board computing power and real-time RF sensing to supplant expensive and overburdened radio technicians. The smart network goes beyond self-frequency planning to also encompass dynamic capacity shifting. That is to say that when a cell is lightly loaded, it can automatically abandon one or more channels in any given sector, thus making those channels available for adjacent cells to use if loading at that cell justifies the need for more spectrum. In addition to the ability to shift spectrum resources around to other cells, it also makes the network as a whole a good neighbor to other systems that might be trying to use the same spectrum in a shared band (like TV White Spaces) by using the minimum amount of spectrum at any given time. Moreover, these capabilities

TABLE OF CONTENTS

will allow xMax® networks themselves to become mobile, adapting to new spectrum conditions and terrain “on-the-go”, which will make xMax® an excellent solution for expeditionary deployments by defense, public safety and emergency agencies.

Spectrum mobility refers to the ability to make use of spectrum dynamically, commonly called DSA. The system can decide to change bands or channels within the spectrum in which they are operating.

Spectrum sharing is the ability for a cognitive radio system to operate in shared spectrum (unlicensed spectrum, for example), detect stations that interfere with the transmissions, mitigate that interference if possible, or avoid it by changing operating frequencies or other system parameters. By enabling xMax® to tolerate high levels of interference before requiring the radios to switch channels, more “gray spectrum” (containing interference or jamming) can be used in place of white spectrum (clean and interference-free). This makes these white spectrum channels available for other radios that cannot mitigate the interference on their current channel. The overall capability increases the network’s total throughput and capacity greatly — without consuming additional scarce spectrum resources.

Spatial processing is the use of multiple integrated receiver chains known as MIMO systems that can provide another layer of resistance to interferers. MIMO processing allows better use of the radio channel to improve link budget and data rates. By employing advanced signal processing techniques, we believe that our system can also be used to track and mitigate interference from multiple mobile transmitters using sophisticated signal processing algorithms. The ability to mitigate, rather than simply run away from interference will be critical going forward. We believe that there will be no more “white spaces” and that all spectrum will be made up of “gray spaces” (interference laden frequencies) caused by a system’s own self-interface or that which is caused by other nearby systems.

We believe that a true cognitive or intelligent radio network will make use of most, if not all, of these capabilities in order to be able dynamically to keep the system operating by mitigating or avoiding interference that may show up in the frequencies the cognitive network is currently using. If the interference becomes too severe, an intelligent system will be able to locate other spectrum and shift the radio links to new frequencies nearly instantaneously. Using cognitive radio techniques, the cognitive network can intelligently share spectrum and extract more bandwidth via “opportunistic use” of shared spectrum resources.

Today’s cognitive radio systems are taking advantage of new antenna technology (such as MIMO) and digital signal processors (DSPs) with advanced, innovative software algorithms. This evolution has also yielded a class of DSPs that are incredibly powerful, yet still energy-efficient. These and other technologies are enabling a new generation of smart (i.e., cognitive) radios. In general, the limiting factor in high capacity wireless systems is interference. As stated above, there are a number of ways to deal with interference to keep the communications link up and running. Unlike traditional systems (such as 3G and 4G), cognitive systems can recognize and then deal with interference locally and in real-time, thus greatly increasing the capacity of new and existing spectrum.

Products

xMax®:

The first implementation of xG’s innovative cognitive radio intellectual property is xMax®. Operating initially within the 902 – 928 MHz license-free band, xMax® is a mobile voice over internet protocol (“VoIP”) and broadband data system that utilizes an end-to-end Internet Protocol (“IP”) system architecture. The xMax® technology we are developing is spectrum agnostic. In any spectrum band that xMax® will operate in, we will break the band into channels and sub channels. We will then use spatial processing and adaptive modulation to mitigate interference in that band. If the band becomes unusable because of overwhelming interference, we will then use dynamic spectrum access to change to another channel or band. The xMax® product suite we are currently developing is band specific due to the current limitations in RF technology that can be produced for a given size, cost and complexity. Multiband, small, portable devices today require custom developed integrated circuits, which are on our technology roadmap, but not currently available. The mid-term objective is to transition implementation of xMax® to a licensing and semiconductor chip business model, which is anticipated to begin in 2016.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The xMax® system design represents a turnkey network solution that will include rapid-deploy self-organizing access points (base stations), fixed and mobile personal Wi-Fi hotspots, mobile switching centers, as well as network management and deployment tools. A key feature of the xMax® system is the ability to leverage off-the-shelf commercial mobile devices (such as smartphones, laptops and tablets), resulting in reduced network infrastructure, maintenance and operational costs. The xMax® system will allow mobile operators to utilize free, unlicensed 902 – 928 MHz ISM band spectrum (available in most of the Americas) instead of having to purchase scarce licensed spectrum which can be prohibitively expensive. In addition, mobile network operators will be able to use xMax® cognitive radio technology to add additional capacity to licensed spectrum by identifying and utilizing unused bandwidth in those frequencies.

Our xMax® system is designed to utilize an advanced cognitive radio technology that incorporates OFDM and MIMO to increase interference tolerance, allow mobility, and improve resistance to fading. All xMax® products leverage an array of high-performance, low-cost digital signal processors (DSPs) that enable multidimensional signal processing that mitigates interference and dynamically optimizes available spectrum. xMax’s software defined radios (SDR) are designed to be inherently frequency-agile, which will allow network access points and user devices to automatically retune and operate on clearer channels within the band. This innovative signal processing will enable xMax® to deliver a licensed spectrum experience using unlicensed spectrum.

The product portfolio that we are creating by combining advanced computer processing power and novel wireless design means that a technology solution is becoming a viable alternative to past public and private spectrum acquisition policies. We employ a multifaceted cognitive radio approach that combines sophisticated interference mitigation capabilities with innovative dynamic spectrum access attributes. The former features MIMO smart antenna technologies. Employed in concert, these capabilities will help squeeze additional usable spectrum out of airwaves once considered unusable for advanced mobile communications.

CN5100 Mobile Hotspot (formerly known as xMod):

The xMax® CN5100 Mobile Hotspot is a device that allows users of Wi-Fi-enabled smartphones, tablets, notebooks and other devices to access the Internet through the xMax® cognitive radio network. The CN5100 Mobile Hotspot acts as a transparent protocol bridge that connects end user devices to the wide-area xMax® network using secure Wi-Fi links, USB or Ethernet cables. It supports not only fixed users but will also supports mobile users and has been designed to provide exceptional QoS (Quality of Service) and MoS (Mean Opinion Score) while supporting calls, texting (SMS) and broadband data streams over the xMax® network.

The CN5100 Mobile Hotspot includes a Wi-Fi router chip that allows it to simultaneously support multiple external devices wirelessly. It will enable operators to deploy long-range xMax® networks that can integrate with the large installed base of Wi-Fi and Ethernet-capable devices. Subscribers will easily be able to install and set up a CN5100 Mobile Hotspot to support any device having a Wi-Fi, USB or Ethernet

TABLE OF CONTENTS

connection. By incorporating xMax® radios and 2x4 MIMO technology, CN5100 Mobile Hotspots can provide range and reliability that management believes is superior to Wi-Fi-based wide-area systems.

The CN5100 Mobile Hotspot and xMax® system is designed to support nomadic and mobile connectivity (including high-speed handoffs) which will allow xMax® operators to offer on-the-go services that differ from those of fixed services, such as cable and DSL. It will be possible to deploy xMax® in fixed, mobile or nomadic configurations. When a planned later version of xMax® delivering higher data rates is deployed in a fixed manner rural telecommunications operators could recover the cost of the network via the Universal Service Fund (“USF”) subsidy mechanism. Recent regulatory reform has begun to transition USF support to broadband capable networks. Because xMax® can carry both voice and data, we believe that xMax® is well suited for rural carriers to handle such a transition. As with all the components in the xMax® family of products, the CN5100 is designed to offer increased range, flexibility, throughput and reliability, while reducing network deployment and management costs. Management believes this will make xMax® an attractive solution for WISPs, mobile telecommunications operators and other service providers.

CN3100 Vehicle Modem (formerly known as xVM):

The xMax® CN3100 Vehicle Modem is an IP67-rated ruggedized subscriber device that is designed to be installed inside or outside vehicles. The CN3100 acts as a transparent protocol bridge, allowing users of WiFi-enabled smartphones, tablets, notebooks and other devices to seamlessly access the Internet through the xMax cognitive radio network.

The CN3100 Vehicle Modem is waterproof and made to withstand wide temperature ranges and challenging environmental conditions. It has been designed to meet the extreme demands characteristic of expeditionary environments, making it ideally suited for employment in the public safety, homeland security, and military market places.

While primarily developed for vehicle usage, the CN3100 Vehicle Modem may also be externally mounted in fixed locations like parks or other outdoor areas to provide WiFi access for use in monitoring, surveillance, machine-to-machine and other applications using the xMax backhaul link.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem:

Introduced in 2014, the xMax® CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem is a single compact unit that operates in both the 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz frequency bands. The CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem utilizes interprotocol smart-routing algorithms to automatically determine which frequency to use based on the user’s application. Voice calls are prioritized to the 900 MHz band while video and data are prioritized to the 2.4 GHz band. The experience to the user is seamless, providing simultaneous high speed data communications and calling without latency or echo.

CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem is designed for use in both fixed and mobile applications. In logistics, military, or public service applications, the 2.4 GHz link can assist in loading and unloading high volumes of data from the application server to a stationary vehicle and then transparently switch over to 900 MHz once it goes mobile. The CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem automatically switches all data and voice traffic to the 900 MHz radio to keep the connection alive. When the vehicle becomes stationary again, the CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem resumes dual band operation.

The CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem has been designed with built-in redundancy with automatic failover. If the 2.4 GHz band becomes congested, slow, or filled with interference, the CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem automatically routes all voice and data communications over the 900 MHz band to preserve communications.

The CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem has been engineered to support the delivery of both fixed location high data rates and reliable high-speed mobility in the same system. It is management’s belief that it will provide a cost-effective way for rural telecommunications operators to deliver high quality voice, high speed data, and streaming video to their rural and remote customers. We believe the CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem will help these operators recover the cost of the network via the Universal Service Fund (“USF”) subsidy mechanism. Recent regulatory reform has begun to transition USF support from telephone to broadband services. Because xMax® can carry both voice and data, we believe that xMax® is well suited for rural carriers to handle such a migration.

In addition, it is expected that the CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem will allow these providers to create entirely new sources of unregulated revenue, for example, providing voice and data services to local emergency response teams.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CN1100 Access Point (formerly known as xAP):

The xMax® CN1100 Access Point is an all-IP wireless access point that will deliver wide area coverage and reliability even when there is significant interference. The CN1100 Access Point brings together innovative technologies including Software Defined Radio (SDR), cognitive networking and a 2x4 MIMO in a compact and affordable broadband access point. These capabilities will enable the CN1100 Access Point to deliver wide area coverage and broadband throughput for fixed, nomadic and mobile applications.

xMax® radios and 2x4 MIMO technologies give the CN1100 Access Point range and reliability surpassing Wi-Fi-based systems. The CN1100 Access Point (as well as all xMax® components) will support nomadic and fully mobile connectivity, including high-speed handoff that will allow xMax® operators to offer on-the-go services that differ from those of fixed services, such as cable and DSL. As part of the xMax® family of products, the CN1100 Access Point is designed to offer increased coverage, throughput and robustness while reducing network deployment and management costs, making it, we believe, an attractive solution for WISPs, mobile telecommunications operators and other service providers. When implemented, Self-Organizing Networking (SON) technology will simplify and speed deployment for commercial, private and tactical networks.

The CN1100 Access Point is a small, single channel device that will provide a data rate of up to 3 Mbps per channel and supports a range of 1 to 5 miles (non-line-of-sight) and up to 8 miles (line-of-sight), depending on conditions. The xMax® system is designed so that it will be possible to collocate multiple CN1100 Access Points in order to increase system capacity. CN1100 Access Points are GPS time-synchronized to avoid self-interference, which increases overall system capacity and load leveling. These features, along with deterministic Media Access Control (MAC) for high-quality voice calls, give the xMax® system improved scalability in real-world conditions.

Having numerous accessible channels will allow neighboring network nodes (made up of one or more CN1100 Access Points) to utilize non-interfering channels automatically when employing the network self-planning features that are in our technology roadmap. This will allow the network to grow and scale more easily without the operator having to redesign the network RF plan each time a device moves, or when CN1100 Access Points or users are added or removed from the network.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CN7000 Mobile Control Center (formerly known as xMSC):

The xMax® CN7000 Mobile Control Center is the backbone network element in the xMax® regional network. The CN7000 controls the delivery of the voice and data services, and manages all elements in the regional network, including access points and end-user devices.

The CN7000 Mobile Control Center acts as an aggregation point for the connected CN1100 Access Points. It performs routing and security functions. The CN7000 Mobile Control Center is typically connected to the Global Information Grid (GIG) and one or more VoIP soft switches.

xMonitor/xDrive:

These software tools provide integrated and comprehensive network and element management for the xMax® network, as well as mobile network throughput and coverage optimization.

xMonitor is a component of the CN7000 Mobile Control Center that monitors the status and health of all CN1100 Access Points, CN7000 Mobile Control Center elements, and VoIP core elements. It provides

TABLE OF CONTENTS

end-to-end IP network management and monitoring services. xMonitor is a web-based application that will be installed at an operator’s Network Operation Center, enabling remote management of network status. The program runs as a live application that continuously collects data from the network, updating the aggregated information without user intervention. It can be programmed to display specific views around the clock — providing an at-a-glance heads-up display from which to survey the network.

xDrive is a drive mapping utility designed to gather, display and log performance statistics from the CN5100 Mobile Hotspot, CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem and CN3100 Vehicle Modem. It will allow field technicians to map the coverage of a deployment of CN1100 Access Points, as well as providing CN5100 Mobile Hotspot/CN3200 Dual-Band Routing Modem/CN3100 Vehicle Modem to CN1100 Access Points to link statistics.

Competition

The wireless technology sector is intensely competitive and is rapidly evolving. Several vendors have researched and experimented with cognitive radios. This research predominately falls under the traditional industry defined use of a cognitive radio where cognitive capabilities are restricted to dynamic spectrum access (“DSA”) within the radio device. However, we believe that only a few vendors are undertaking development across all the key elements of cognitive technology: spectrum sensing, spectrum management, spectrum mobility, spectrum sharing, and spatial processing.

As an example, both Spectrum Bridge and Microsoft have developed a database approach to frequency reuse. This method was developed specifically to enable unlicensed broadband systems to coexist with existing TV transmitters in the TV White Spaces band.

We not only face competition from other companies developing cognitive radio solutions but we are also competing for sales to end-user customers with companies offering solutions utilizing other technologies for access to licensed and unlicensed spectrum, such as LTE and Wi-Fi.

In the cognitive radio market, our competitors include, Neul Ltd., Shared Spectrum Corporation and Adaptrum.

End-customers in the rural broadband market are being offered a choice of solutions based on alternative technologies, such as LTE and Wi-Fi. Global communications networking equipment vendors such as Ericsson, Huawei, Alcatel-Lucent and others are actively selling and deploying LTE and, to a lesser extent, WiMax equipment with rural telecommunications operators that own, or can lease, appropriate licensed spectrum frequencies. We also face competition for equipment sales with Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti Networks and Cambium Networks, which have also targeted markets for communications systems around the world similar to our target markets. Although these companies are vastly larger than we are, with significantly greater resources, we believe that we or our channel partners will need to convince end users to consider our offerings as a viable alternative to these larger companies if we are to succeed.

It is not uncommon for a single rural operator to deploy a mix of technologies (such as LTE and Wi-Fi) to address differing applications, spectrum holdings and economics across their market areas. As new technologies are introduced and spectrum availability and costs increase, we anticipate that rural telecommunications operators will continue to deploy a growing range of innovative solutions that deliver voice and data communications to their customers.

The main vendor in the public safety market is Motorola Solutions, which is a global player that holds a highly dominant market share in the U.S. of over 80% in public safety and government wireless networks.

In the defense market, there are several large and significant companies that provide wireless communications systems to U.S. and international military agencies, including Harris Corporation, ITT Industries, Raytheon, Boeing, Thales Communications and Lockheed Martin. It is common for one competitor to be a subcontractor to another competitor who is the prime contractor and vice versa as programs of record ramp up and ramp down over time.

A number of our current or potential competitors have long operating histories, significant brand recognition, large customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources than we do. As an emerging technology company, our brand is not as well known as incumbents in

TABLE OF CONTENTS

those markets. Potential customers may prefer to purchase from their existing suppliers rather than a new supplier, regardless of product performance or features.

Competitive Positioning

Regulatory risk — we believe that our choice initially to develop our cognitive radio technology utilizing the unlicensed 902 – 928 band exposes us to less regulatory risk than companies building products upon newly available TV White Space frequencies. Whereas the 902 – 928 MHz band has withstood multiple attempts to redefine the rules regarding its use, newer frequency bands such as TV White Spaces have yet to demonstrate their permanence. Specific initiatives to license off TV White Space frequencies for cellular carrier use are being promoted by licensed spectrum stakeholders. While our core technology can be adapted for operation upon such newly available frequencies once their staying power has been demonstrated, we believe that we are not subject to the same make-or-break dependency upon the availability of TV White Spaces as are most other cognitive radio product companies.

Mobility — we are specifically developing our product line to support mobility. We believe that mobility is an important differentiator with regard to our offering in the marketplace. Designed to do its own RF planning automatically by utilizing an extended range of non-interfering channels without manual intervention, xMax® will offer the ability to make the entire network infrastructure mobile, with CN1100 base stations able to move in relation to each other as well as to CN5100s, CN3100’s and users. We believe this feature will be unique to xMax® and will address a major capability gap for defense, homeland security, and public safety agencies which all require “on the move” communications networks. These agencies currently have no equipment or capacity for this identified and urgently needed capability.

Support for both real-time VoIP and data sessions utilizing a single set of infrastructure — Most IP systems do not carry large numbers of simultaneous voice conversations. We have focused on designing a core technology that is capable of carrying both mass-scale voice and data sessions on the same network.

Interference mitigation  — Whereas most efforts to date focus on interference avoidance, we have extended our core competency into the realm of interference mitigation. In a world where wireless demand is certain to result in more, not less, congested airwaves, we believe that our intellectual property that can help to ameliorate interference is a unique competitive advantage in the marketplace.

We believe we compete favorably on these factors. However, our industry is evolving rapidly and is becoming increasingly competitive. Other developers could develop alternative wireless cognitive networks and other technologies that may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain customers. These competitors may include companies of which we may not be currently aware.

Sales and Marketing

Our strategy is to sell intellectual property and the equipment in which our intellectual property is initially implemented, globally direct and through an indirect channel network that we will leverage in order to upscale our selling efforts without the significant cost of a large direct sales force. Our channel partners will utilize their own internal and external sales representatives to provide lead generation among their established customer base and beyond, pre-sales support, product fulfillment and, in certain circumstances, post-sales customer service and support. In certain cases, service providers may also act as a channel partner for sales of our solutions to their existing customers or new enterprise accounts.

Our sales team currently is comprised of business development, relationship and account executives and a channel manager. This sales team is focused on supporting our current customers, as well as nurturing relationships with prospective customers in key domestic and international markets. Our relationship managers support the development of sales presentation materials and training of our channel partner sales personnel to assist them in marketing our services, either directly or indirectly to their customers. We also directly train and support selected key customers and technology providers in order to grow an active client base and solidify relationships. We are currently using the SalesLogix Customer Relationship Management (CRM) tool to manage our sales activity and manage these relationships.

As of August 11, 2015, our business development, sales and marketing team consisted of 8 full-time employees or contractors, supported by outside marketing professionals.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Customers

We have begun to implement our sales and marketing strategy, both through direct sales to end-customers and indirect sales to channel network partners and we have entered into a number of equipment purchase, reseller and teaming agreements as a result. These customer engagements span our target markets in rural telecommunications and defense.

The Company was delayed listing on the NASDAQ from April 2013 until July 2013. The Company received proceeds of $7.4M from the public offering. FCC certification on its products was delayed until September 2013. Outsourcing a full production line, general release of the software and establishing a sales division was further delayed until additional proceeds of $10M was completed in November 2013. A limited production line was completed in December 2013 along with establishing a sales and customer service organization. During this timeframe, rural broadband requirements mandated by the FCC were changing with minimum speeds going from 4Mbps down and 1 up (initial products met these requirements) to proposed speeds of 10Mbps down and 1 up. This pending FCC proceeding culminated in a Report and Order on December 18, 2014. The Company believes that rural telephone companies may discharge their responsibilities under the FCC’s Report and Order, while meeting their obligations thereunder. The Company developed a new product and received FCC certification in January 2015. The xRM performance now exceeds the FCC requirements for rural broadband.

Certain contracts on the backlog expired during this timeframe and were not renewed. These were mostly reseller agreements in which their customers could not wait any longer for the Company to commercialize its products and/or receive the necessary certifications.

Revenues are recognized over the respective lives of the agreements according to the delivery and transfer of ownership and risk of xMax equipment and the provision of services as well as specification of features required by our customers. These potential customers do not satisfy certain technical expectations or requirements of those customers, we will not receive any revenue from these purchase orders.

We have begun to fulfill orders now that our equipment has been certificated by the FCC. Revenues are recognized over the respective lives of the agreements according to the delivery and transfer of ownership and risk of xMax® equipment and the provision of services as well as specification of features required by our customers.

Manufacturing and Suppliers

We retain contract manufacturers to manufacture, test, assure the quality of, and ship our products. We primarily utilize contract manufacturers located in the United States to ensure proximity between the manufacturer and our design and development engineers and with the initial customers we anticipate winning.

Our internal manufacturing organization consists of a small number of supply chain managers, employees and contractors who supervise the manufacture of our products at contract manufacturer sites. We rely on our contract manufacturers, test engineers and our internal quality assurance resources to implement quality assurance programs designed to assure high product quality and reliability.

In the future, we will focus on our core strengths, which are innovation and technology design and the development, creation and exploitation of our intellectual property. Accordingly, we ultimately plan to become a designer, developer and fabless supplier of xMax® integrated circuits and system software solutions for xMax® products where we would supply integrated circuits produced by third party manufacturing partners under license, software, reference designs, features, tools and technical support.

We rely on third party components and technology to build our products, and we procure components, subassemblies and products necessary for the manufacture of our products based upon our design, development and production needs. Once we have retained a contract manufacturer, they will be responsible for obtaining these components, subassemblies and products. While components and supplies are generally available from a variety of sources, we currently depend on a single or limited number of suppliers for several components for our products. We are using a single source digital signal processor that may be difficult to replace with an equivalent performance device. In the longer term, we are planning to adapt the xMax® system to run on multiple low cost platforms. We rely on purchase orders rather than long-term contracts with

TABLE OF CONTENTS

our suppliers. We do not currently stockpile enough components to mitigate any potential supply disruption if we are required to re-engineer our products to use alternative components.

Intellectual Property

Our business is significantly based on the creation, acquisition, use and protection of intellectual property. Some of this intellectual property is in the form of software code, patented technology and trade secrets that we use to develop our technologies, solutions and products. We have developed a broad portfolio of intellectual property that covers wired and wireless communications systems. As of August 11, 2015, in the United States, we have 54 patents granted, 4 patent applications pending, and 1 provisional application pending. Internationally, we have 59 patents granted and 47 patent applications pending.

Areas of our development activities for xMax® and beyond that have culminated in filings and/or awarded patents include:

We protect our intellectual property rights by relying on federal, state and common law rights, as well as contractual restrictions. We control access to our proprietary technology by entering into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees and contractors, and confidentiality agreements with third parties. We also actively engage in monitoring activities with respect to infringing uses of our intellectual property by third parties.

In addition to these contractual arrangements, we also rely on a combination of trade secret, copyright, trademark, trade dress, domain name and patents to protect our products and other intellectual property. We typically own the copyright to our software code, as well as the brand or title name trademark under which our products are marketed. We pursue the registration of our domain names, trademarks, and service marks in the United States and in locations outside the United States. Our registered trademarks in the United States include “xG”, and “xMax®”, the names of our suite of products, among others.

Circumstances outside our control could pose a threat to our intellectual property rights. For example, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in the United States or other countries in which our products are sold or distributed. Also, the efforts we have taken to protect our proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective. Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm our business or our ability to compete. In addition, protecting our intellectual property rights is costly and time-consuming. Any unauthorized disclosure or use of our intellectual property could make it more expensive to do business, thereby harming our operating results.

Companies in the mobile wireless communications technology and other industries may own large numbers of patents, copyrights and trademarks and may frequently request license agreements, threaten litigation or file suit against us based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. We may face allegations by third parties, including our competitors and non-practicing entities, that we

TABLE OF CONTENTS

have infringed their trademarks, copyrights, patents and other intellectual property rights. As our business grows, we will likely face more claims of infringement.

Government Regulations

Regulators’ Role in Spectrum.  In the past, all radios were designed with the assumption that they were operating in a spectrum band that was free of interference. There was no requirement to design radios with the ability to dynamically change channels or change spectrum bands in response to interference. These radios required pristine, dedicated licensed spectrum to operate. This led to the FCC and other regulators worldwide licensing spectrum to a particular network operator, for example, cellular paging or wireless service provider so that interference would be carefully controlled. Because of this past legacy, significant blocks of spectrum were underutilized. Even in spectrum bands that might be considered to be highly utilized, valuable spectrum can sit idle in sparsely populated areas or at certain hours of the day when network use dramatically drops.

There are also applications such as paging that have fallen out of favor and contribute to this underutilization. Despite the dramatic drop in the use of pagers, a large amount of spectrum is still dedicated to this application. This regulatory policy has led to inefficient use of spectrum and consequently the declaration of a spectrum crisis. While regulators are continuing to allocate spectrum based upon this assumption that radios do not have the ability to share spectrum, they are now starting to embrace the concept of shared spectrum and the opportunistic use of spectrum enabled by cognitive radio networks.

Regulators are starting to ease the rules relating to the allocation and access of spectrum. A good example of this is the shared use of TV broadcast spectrum via the creation of TV White Spaces for wireless broadband. The FCC and other spectrum regulatory agencies like the UK’s Ofcom have begun the process to allow cognitive radios to use freed-up spectrum resulting from the transition from analog to digital TV broadcasts. For example, TV white space continues to gain momentum in the US and Europe with multiple deployments and trials being supported by some of the world’s largest technology companies. Furthermore, a new group has been formed called AIR.U that is being funded by Microsoft, Google and others to utilize TV White Spaces to bring high-speed Internet services to rural campuses, schools and other institutions in the US. Similar initiatives are being undertaken in the UK with extensive trials being done in both urban and rural settings using TV White Spaces. In addition to two of the largest technology companies mentioned above, Nokia is also taking a leading role in the UK’s TV White Space trials. While there have been rumors circulating that the FCC was somehow taking back TV White Spaces, there appears to be no actual indication of this taking place. In fact, the FCC appears to be approving more TV White Space database administrators as well as certifying additional radio platforms for operation in TV White Spaces. It is possible, nonetheless, that over time, TV White Spaces could be reclaimed by Congress or the FCC and re-auctioned for licensed use. However, that is a risk any unlicensed spectrum faces and has never actually occurred in the US. Other countries globally are also seriously considering creating their own TV white space allocations. These countries include Canada, Brazil and the EU.

Operators and consumers are able to use available unlicensed spectrum bands for the delivery of new applications and inexpensive broadband capacity. An example of this is the data offload efforts of some carriers that use 802.11 Wi-Fi (in the 2.4 and 5.8 GHz unlicensed bands) in densely populated areas where their 3G network is congested. This allows carriers to continue supporting mobile voice and data services over their licensed spectrum, while data that can be consumed at a fixed location (airport, coffee shop, office, etc.) is forced over an unlicensed Wi-Fi link. However, the popularity of Wi-Fi and other devices that use these frequencies has resulted in crowded and noisy spectrum that not only has to support the carriers’ smartphone data, but all other applications from other devices in that band as well. The interference in these bands affects the capacity and efficiency of this spectrum for conventional radios. However, where conventional radios see “walls of interference”, cognitive radios can uncover “windows of opportunity” and recover up to 85% of the total unused bandwidth in these frequencies.

The FCC’s Part 15 rules that govern use of the 902 – 928 MHz ISM band and other unlicensed spectrum bands are well established and are considered responsible for creating an environment where technology and innovation has flourished. They are recognized as having helped create an industry that has generated tens of thousands of high technology jobs, added billions of dollars to the United States economy, and brought the benefits of a wide variety of convenient, economical communications devices to business, industry, education,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

health care providers and consumers alike. While there have been some attempts to challenge them, they have always been reaffirmed and we have every reason to believe they will remain so.

Even during the recent debates over spectrum policy, there have been no suggestions put forth by the FCC, the Congress or industry to repurpose the ISM unlicensed band to a licensed one that could be auctioned off. The reallocation of a band that is in active use by so many devices would be prohibitively disruptive. Given the long history and widespread use of the ISM band for such a wide array of communications, we feel very confident that it will remain open to use by technologies such as xMax® for the foreseeable future.

While devices operating upon unlicensed bands do not require FCC licensing, they are not unregulated and must meet the Federal Code of Regulation (CFR) FCC Part 15, which is a common testing standard for most electronic equipment. FCC Part 15 covers the regulations under which an intentional, unintentional, or incidental radiator that can be operated without an individual license. FCC Part 15 covers as well the technical specifications, administrative requirements and other conditions relating to the marketing of FCC Part 15 devices.

In order to reduce regulatory risk and gain familiarity with the requirements we elected to obtain FCC equipment authorization on some of our pre-commercial prototype xMax® devices. FCC authorized testing laboratories were used to make measurements to ensure that the prototype equipment complied with the appropriate technical standards. Although not required unless specifically requested, we submitted a sample unit and representative data to the Commissions demonstrating compliance. Multiple briefings were also scheduled with the FCC Chief of the Office of Engineering Technology (OET) and staff, which is responsible for Equipment Certifications in an effort to inform them of our design approaches and objectives.

Limitation of existing solutions.  Existing wireless networking technologies such as standard 802.11 based Wi-Fi, WiMAX and LTE have been designed to satisfy the increasing demand for broadband access and support mobility. According to a Gartner forecast in May 2011, aggregate end-user spending on wireless networking equipment for Enterprise WLAN, wireless broadband access, and LTE solutions, are expected to grow from $5.2 billion in 2010 to $22.5 billion in 2015, representing a CAGR of 34%. However, these existing alternative networking solutions often fail to meet the price-performance requirements of wireless networking in emerging markets, which in turn has led to low penetration and large populations of unaddressed users in these areas. As a result, there is a strong need for cost-effective solutions to deliver wireless networking solutions to consumers and enterprises in underserved and underpenetrated markets. These solutions must be robust and provide service equivalent to that of alternative wired and wireless solutions while simultaneously meeting the economic objectives of network operators and service providers in these markets.

Increasing use of the unlicensed spectrum.  Private industry in underserved and underpenetrated markets worldwide has responded to the lack of wired infrastructure by deploying wireless networks utilizing unlicensed RF spectrum. These network operators and service providers often cannot afford the capital outlay to acquire licenses for the licensed RF spectrum and have consequently designed their wireless networks for the unlicensed RF spectrum. In the absence of affordable broadband access in the licensed spectrum, the number of users of the unlicensed RF spectrum has increased for communications equipment, as well as consumer devices such as cordless phones, baby monitors and microwave ovens. As a result of high demand for the unlicensed RF spectrum, use of this spectrum to provide high quality wireless networking has become more challenging and congestion is limiting the growth of wireless networks.

Government incentives for broadband acces.  Governments around the world are increasingly taking both regulatory and financial steps to expand access to broadband networks and increase availability of advanced broadband services to consumers and businesses. For example, in many countries, including the United States, the responsible regulatory agencies have released the spectrum previously used for broadcast TV, known as the TV White Space, to relieve some of the congestion. The United States and other countries have adopted stimulus plans to increase the delivery of robust broadband access in unserved and underserved areas. The World Bank has reported that 12 countries and the EU have committed an aggregate of $122.4 billion in broadband stimulus funds to date.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Employees

As of August 11, 2015, we employed 61 full-time equivalent employees, contractors or consultants, which included 39 in development, 3 officers, 5 in general and administrative, 2 in business development, 6 in operations and 6 in sales and marketing. We also engage a number of temporary employees and consultants. None of our employees are represented by a labor union or is a party to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that we have good relations with our employees.

Properties

Our corporate headquarters and marketing and business development office are located in Sarasota, Florida, in an office consisting of a total of 3,403 square feet pursuant to a lease that expires October 31, 2019. For our research and development, engineering, sales and support personnel we also have an office in Sunrise, Fort Lauderdale, Florida consisting of 12,832 square feet pursuant to a lease that expires on May 11, 2016. We believe our current facilities are sufficient for our current needs and will be adequate, or that suitable additional or substitute space will be available on commercially reasonable terms, for the foreseeable future.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are a party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of business. Future litigation may be necessary to defend ourselves and our customers by determining the scope, enforceability and validity of third party proprietary rights or to establish our proprietary rights.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT

Executive Officers and Directors

The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of all of the directors and executive officers of the Company and the positions they hold as of the date hereof.

Name		Age		Position
George F. Schmitt		71		Executive Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Roger G. Branton		48		Chief Financial Officer
James Woodyatt		47		President
Belinda Marino		55		Secretary
John C. Coleman		61		Director
Gary Cuccio		69		Director
Kenneth Hoffman		59		Director
Richard L. Mooers		51		Director
Raymond M. Sidney		45		Director
General James T. Conway		67		Director

Background of Directors and Executive Officers

George F. Schmitt, Executive Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Mr. Schmitt has over 40 years of broad telecom experience in wireless and wireline companies and has built wireless networks in a dozen countries. He is a major investor in xG Technology through his personal holdings and through his holdings in MBTH and became Executive Chairman of the Board on July 19, 2013 while previously serving as a Director since February 4, 2011, and having been the Chief Executive Officer since February 7, 2015. He also previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of MBTH, from December 2010 through December 2013. Mr. Schmitt currently sits on the board of directors of SecureAlert, Culient, and the California Thoroughbred Breeders Association. Mr. Schmitt previously served as a director of TeleAtlas, Objective Systems Integrators, Omnipoint and LHS Group. Mr. Schmitt is a principal of Sierra Sunset II, LLC and served as a former Trustee of St. Mary’s College. In addition, Mr. Schmitt has served as a director of many privately held companies including Voice Objects, Knowledge Adventure, Jungo and Cybergate, among others. Mr. Schmitt has also served as Financial Vice President of Pacific Telesis and chaired the Audit Committees of Objective Systems Integrations and TeleATLAS. Mr. Schmitt received an M.S. in Management from Stanford University, where he was a Sloan Fellow, and a B.A. in Political Science from Saint Mary’s College.

Mr. Schmitt was selected to serve on our board based on his extensive experience with technology and networking companies and broad experience in the telecommunications industry and his status as a significant investor in our company.

Roger G. Branton, Chief Financial Officer

For the past 12 years Mr. Branton has served in a variety of positions with our company since its founding in August 2002. Mr. Branton currently serves as our Chief Financial Officer since inception. He also serves in similar capacities at MBTH, a company he co-founded with Richard Mooers and George Schmitt in 2010. He graduated from West Chester University in Pennsylvania with a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting. He trained as a certified public accountant in 1989.

James Woodyatt, President

Mr. Woodyatt has served as our President since April 20, 2012. He also served as our Deputy Chief Executive Officer from June 2007 to April 20, 2012, at which time James assumed the President title, and as a Director from January 2007 through July 2013. From February 2006 until October 2011, James served as President of Veegoo Holding SA, a company he co-founded in 2006 and as a Managing Director of Veegoo Capital Services SA, a group which is active in business advisory and private equity.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Belinda Marino, Secretary

Mrs. Marino has served secretary since August 2013. Mrs. Marino is also an employee of the Company serving as the Director of Human Resources since 2006. In addition to the above, Mrs. Marino has ongoing responsibilities for functions that include corporate banking activities and corporate governance. Mrs. Marino earned a PHR (Professional in Human Resources) Certificate from the HR Certification Institute in 2009.

John C. Coleman, Director

Mr. Coleman brings to us 35 years of combined experience in expeditionary operations from both government service and the private sector. From June 2010 to February 2015, he has served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. From January 2009 to June 2012, he was the Chief Executive Officer of Joint Command and Control Consulting (JC3), a consulting services firm he founded that is focused on the development, integration, and delivery of mature and emerging technologies in support of expeditionary operations, particularly as related to command, control, and communications. In conjunction with its strategic partners, JC3 provides C4ISR-related systems, service, training, and support to expeditionary responders, both civil and military. He also served as a Vice-President of Hunter Defense Technology, a position he held from July 2006 to December 2008. In the thirty years preceding private sector employment, Mr. Coleman served the United States as a U.S. Marine Officer. Defining the character of his service upon retirement, Mr. Coleman was awarded the nation’s Distinguished Service Medal, an honor very rarely and only under exceptional circumstance bestowed to Marines below the rank of General Officer. He retired from the U.S. Marine Corp as a Colonel. He possesses top secret clearance which gives him access to several of our major markets. Currently, Mr. Coleman serves as a member of the board of xG.

Mr. Coleman was selected to serve on our board based on his significant experience with the military and military operations.

Gary Cuccio, Director

Gary Cuccio has over 35 years of broad operating experience in wireless, software, engineering, operations, sales and marketing. Mr. Cuccio currently serves as Chairman of Openet Telecom Ltd. Based in Dublin, Ireland, Openet Telecom is a venture-backed software company providing IP mediation to leading Telco’s on a global basis. Mr. Cuccio also serves on the board of mBlox as the chairman of its audit committee. mBlox is a venture-backed startup providing a service bureau for SMS messages in the wireless space. Headquartered in London and Sunnyvale, CA, mBlox operates in Europe, the U.S. and Asia. Previously, Mr. Cuccio was CEO of ATG, a CLEC based in California, Oregon, and Washington. Prior to ATG, Mr. Cuccio was CEO of LHS group (Nasdaq: LHSG), a Telco billing software supplier. LHS was acquired by Sema, a French software company, in Q3, 2000 for $6.8BB. Mr. Cuccio was also COO of Omnipoint, a PCS mobile wireless carrier. Mr. Cuccio’s experience also includes several positions held at Airtouch, most notably Vice President of Operations for Europe, Vice President, Asia and President of Airtouch Paging. The company was merged with Vodafone in 1999. He has also served as chairman of the board and audit committee chairman of privately held companies and has helped sell and merge several public and privately held companies. Mr. Cuccio started his career with 27+ years at Pacific Tel in Operations, Engineering, Customer Service and Sales & Marketing, ending his tenure there as VP/General Manager.

Mr. Cuccio received his AMP from Harvard University, his MBA from St. Mary’s College and his BA in Political Science from California State University Los Angeles.

Mr. Cuccio was selected to serve on our board based on his 45 years of experience with technology and communications companies as well as his financial and audit committee background. Mr. Cuccio qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the SEC regulations.

Kenneth Hoffman, Director

Mr. Hoffman joined the Company in August 2010 as an advisor. Ken Hoffman is Vice President of Regulatory Affairs for Florida Power & Light Company, the rate-regulated subsidiary of NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NEE), one of the nation’s leading electricity-related services companies. He is responsible for providing assistance in the management and oversight of FPL’s regulatory activities before state regulators and the State Legislature on energy matters. Mr. Hoffman joined FPL in 2008 after a successful career in private

TABLE OF CONTENTS

law practice specializing in the representation of public utilities and telecommunications companies before the Florida Public Service Commission, the Florida Legislature and the Florida courts. He has over 25 years’ experience representing various types of telecommunications carriers including wireless before regulatory and legislative bodies. His expertise in regulatory proceedings in Florida will be helpful as we grow and face potential regulatory actions. Prior to joining FPL, he was a shareholder at Rutledge Ecenia Purnell & Hoffman, PA, in Tallahassee, Florida for 14 years.

Mr. Hoffman was selected to serve on our board based on his extensive experience in the utility industry, a key industry segment to utilize our products and services.

Richard L. Mooers, Director

Richard Mooers has been involved in telecommunications activities for over 20 years and has significant expertise in accounting, risk management, and controls. For the past 12 years he has served in a variety of positions with our company since its founding in August, 2002. Mr. Mooers served as our Executive Chairman of the Board from inception until July 19, 2013 and will continue to serve as a Director, a position he has held from inception. He also serves as Chairman, CEO and Director of MBTH a company he co-founded with Roger Branton and George Schmitt in 2010. Richard graduated summa cum laude from the University of Maine, with a Bachelor of Science degree in business administration in 1985. He remains one of the major investors in the Company.

Mr. Mooers was selected to serve on our board based on his extensive experience with technology and telecommunications companies, including as a founder, executive and investor.

Raymond M. Sidney, Director

Dr. Sidney has established several real estate investment ventures and been involved with a number of companies, including Covia Labs, Planetary Resources, Edison2, and AnthroTronix as an investor, board member, or advisor. He also serves on the Vision Circle of the X PRIZE Foundation. Prior to this, Dr. Sidney was the second software engineer hired at Google, Inc.; previously, Dr. Sidney had worked as a security expert and software engineer at RSA Labs and D.E. Shaw & Co., among other companies. He provided the implementation expertise for RC6, RSA’s candidate cipher for NIST’s quest for AES, a successor to the Data Encryption Standard. Dr. Sidney attended Caltech and Harvard, and he received a bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Harvard in 1991. He then entered the graduate program in mathematics at MIT, where he specialized in cryptography and received a PhD in 1995. His higher mathematics knowledge will be helpful to our development team. Dr. Sidney also has an MBA from UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business. In addition, he is active in educational and environmental undertakings in the Lake Tahoe area.

Mr. Sidney was selected to serve on our board based on his extensive experience with technology companies and broad experience in the venture capital industry.

General James T. Conway, Director

General Conway retired from active military duty in 2010. Since retiring, General Conway has consulted for several corporate and non-profit boards, including Textron Inc., Colt Defense and General Dynamics. General Conway also co-chairs the Energy Security Leadership Council, a non-partisan energy policy think tank. Prior to his retirement, General Conway served as the 34^th Commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps for four years. Prior to becoming Commandant, General Conway served for four years on the Joint Chiefs of Staff as Senior Operations Officer in the U.S. military, where he oversaw the war efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. As a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Conway functioned as a military advisor to the Secretary of Defense, the National Security Council, and the President.

General Conway was selected to serve on our board based on his significant experience assessing and implementing military technology operations.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Board Composition and Committees and Director Independence

Director Independence

Our board of directors currently consists of seven members: Richard L. Mooers, John C. Coleman, Gary Cuccio, Kenneth Hoffman, George F. Schmitt, Raymond M. Sidney and General James T. Conway. All of our directors will serve until our next annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

As we are listed on NASDAQ, our determination of independence of directors is made using the definition of “independent director” contained in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Our board affirmatively determined that Gary Cuccio, Kenneth Hoffman, James T. Conway and Ray Sidney, are “independent” directors, as that term is defined in the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules.

Board Committees

Our board of directors has an audit committee, a compensation committee and a governance and nominations committee. Each committee has a charter, which is available on our website at www.xgtechnology.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated herein by reference. Each of the board committees has the composition and responsibilities described below.

Audit Committee

We have an Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The members of our Audit Committee are Gary Cuccio, Ken Hoffman and General James T. Conway. Each of these Committee members is “independent” within the meaning of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules. Our board has determined that Gary Cuccio shall serve as the “audit committee financial expert”, as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. Gary Cuccio currently serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee of mBlox, Inc. and Openet Telecom Ltd. In the past he also served on the Audit Committee of Objective Systems Integration, Inc. and Affinity Internet, Inc. Gary Cuccio will serve as Chairman of our Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and oversees the audit of our financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The specific functions of this Committee include:

Compensation Committee

The members of our Compensation Committee are Gary Cuccio, Ken Hoffman, Ray Sidney and General James T. Conway. Each such member is “independent” within the meaning of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules. In addition, each member of our Compensation Committee qualifies as a “non-employee director” under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act. Our Compensation Committee assists the board of directors in the discharge of its responsibilities relating to the compensation of the board of directors and our executive officers. General James T. Conway serves as Chairman of our Compensation Committee.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Committee’s compensation-related responsibilities include:

Governance and Nominations Committee

The members of our Governance and Nominations Committee are Gary Cuccio, Ken Hoffman, Ray Sidney and General James T. Conway. Each such member is “independent” within the meaning of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules. The purpose of the Governance and Nominations Committee is to recommend to the board nominees for election as directors and persons to be elected to fill any vacancies on the board, develop and recommend a set of corporate governance principles and oversee the performance of the board. Ken Hoffman will serve as chairman of our Governance and Nominations Committee.

The Committee’s responsibilities include:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The governance and nominations committee may delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees as it deems appropriate. The governance and nominations committee is authorized to retain independent legal and other advisors, and conduct or authorize investigations into any matter within the scope of its duties.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has, during the past ten years:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” none of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of the officers or directors of the Company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes information regarding the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to, our Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and our two other most highly compensated executive officers during 2014 and 2013. We refer to these individuals in this report as our named executive officers.

Name and Principal Position		Fiscal Year				Salary ($)				Bonus ($)				Stock Awards ($)				Option Awards ($)(2)				Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)				Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)				All Other Compensation ($)(3)				Total ($)
George F. Schmitt, Executive Chairman(4)			2013				150,000				0				0				0				—				—				0				150,000
			2014				150,000				0				7,581																				157,581
Richard L. Mooers, Executive Chairman(5)			2013				357,500				0				0				12,894				—				—				19,414				389,808
			2014				0				0				0				0												0				0
John C. Coleman,(6) Director			2013				250,000				0				0				51,578				—				—				45,082				346,660
			2014				250,000				0				12,193				0												42,578				304,771
Roger G. Branton, Chief Financial Officer			2013				275,000				0				6,468				0				—				—				12,442				293,910
			2014				240,000				0				0				38,683												10,776				289,459
James Woodyatt, President			2013				165,000				0				0				38,683				—				—				4,676				208,359
			2014				202,522				67,500				8,340				0												3,672				282,034

Executive Compensation Program Components

Base Salary

We provide base salary as a fixed source of compensation for our executive officers, allowing them a degree of certainty when having a meaningful portion of their compensation “at risk” in the form of equity awards covering the shares of a company for whose shares there has been limited liquidity to date. The board of directors recognizes the importance of base salaries as an element of compensation that helps to attract highly qualified executive talent.

Base salaries for our executive officers were established primarily based on individual negotiations with the executive officers when they joined us and reflect the scope of their anticipated responsibilities, the individual experience they bring, the board members’ experiences and knowledge in compensating similarly situated individuals at other companies, our then-current cash constraints, and a general sense of internal pay equity among our executive officers.

The Board does not apply specific formulas in determining base salary increases. In determining base salaries for 2013 and 2014 for our continuing named executive officers, no adjustments were made to the base

TABLE OF CONTENTS

salaries of any of our named executive officers, except for James Woodyatt, as the board or compensation committee determined, in their independent judgment and without reliance on any survey data, that existing base salaries, taken together with other elements of compensation, provided sufficient fixed compensation for retention purposes.

Cash Bonuses or Bonuses Paid in Shares

Prior to the initial public offering, our employees, including our executive officers, have been eligible to earn discretionary performance bonuses based on individual performance. The amount of individual bonus earned was determined in a subjective manner, without specific weightings or a formula.

In 2012, we set targets for the award of corporate performance-related bonuses, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for our employees, including our executive officers. The overall corporate performance of the Company, as evaluated by our board, was with reference to specific pre-established corporate goals, and was the critical factor for determining corporate performance-related bonuses. Each participant could earn an annual bonus of up to 100% of his earned base salary, which our board felt was an appropriate percentage given such payment can be paid in stock or cash at the board’s discretion.

For our 2012 bonus program, our Chief Executive Officer established, in consultation with the board, objectives and key results, for officers and senior management which also applied to all employees of the Company.

Bonus accruals for the 2011 and 2012 calendar years were paid on February 5, 2014 and February 18, 2014 through the issuance of 8,234 and 1,687 common shares. The bonus awarded was allocated to general & administrative and development expenses in 2011 and 2012. During 2013, $2,335,000 of salary expense was reversed to account for the decrease in the fair market value of the accrued bonus from $2,633,000 at December 31, 2012 to $298,000 at December 31, 2013. The reason for the decrease is related to the decrease in the stock price of common shares used for settlement.

In 2013, we again set targets for the award of corporate performance-related bonuses; however, those targets were not met and no performance-related bonuses were paid out. We have not yet set any targets for the award of corporate performance-related bonuses for 2014.

Equity Compensation

As a majority-held company, we have historically used options as the principal component of our executive compensation program. Consistent with our compensation objectives, we believe this approach has allowed us to attract and retain key talent and aligned our executive team’s contributions with the long-term interests of the company and our stockholders. We grant stock options with an exercise price not less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, so these options will have value to our executive officers only if the fair market value of our common stock increases after the date of grant and the date of vesting. Typically, stock options granted to our executive officers vest over three years.

In addition, our board has approved certain executive grants of options containing accelerated vesting provisions upon an involuntary termination (both termination without cause and resignation for good reason) as well as upon certain material change in control transactions. Our board believes these accelerated vesting provisions reflect current market practices, based on the collective knowledge and experiences of our board members (and without reference to specific peer group data), and allow us to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers. In addition, we believe these accelerated vesting provisions will allow our executive officers to focus on closing a transaction that may be in the best interest of our stockholders even though the transaction may otherwise result in a termination of their employment and, absent such accelerated vesting, a forfeiture of their unvested equity awards. Additional information regarding accelerated vesting prior to, upon or following a change in control is discussed below under “— Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

In determining the form, size and material terms of executive equity awards, our board customarily considered, among other things, individual negotiations with the executive officers at their time of hire, the executive officer’s total compensation opportunity, the need to create a meaningful opportunity for reward predicated on the creation of long-term stockholder value, internal pay equity as among our executive officers, notable performance accomplishments, adjustments to duties and the retention implications of existing grants.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our board of directors made the grants to our executive officers set forth below. In determining the size of the equity grants, our board generally considered the CEO’s recommendations, the executive officer’s existing equity award holdings (including the unvested portion of such awards), internal pay equity, our retention and incentive goals, and, as applicable, negotiations with the executive at the time of his hiring. Our board of directors did not make any grants to our executive officers in 2014.

Employment Agreements

The Company has an employment agreement with its former CEO, John Coleman, for a term of three years with automatic renewals unless terminated. Mr. Coleman’s agreement was effective on August 1, 2011. It provides that he will receive a salary of no less than $250,000 per year, subject to annual increases as determined by the Board. In addition, he is entitled to incentive compensation not to exceed two (2) times his base salary. The incentive compensation is payable in shares of common stock at the Company’s discretion. He is also entitled to participate in all other benefits that the Company may provide to other senior executives. The agreement contains a non-compete and non-solicitation provision.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2014

The following table presents information regarding outstanding options held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2014:

		Option Awards
		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable				Option Exercise Price ($)				Option Expiration date
George Schmitt			143				—				84.00				2/23/2020
Total			143				—
John Coleman			143				—				87.50				3/8/2020
			1,429				—				70.00				6/16/2020
			2,858				—				87.50				4/14/2021
			1,334				2,667	(2)			16.30				11/19/2023
Total			5,764				2,667
Roger Branton(1)			3,072				—				192.50				1/2/2015
			7,858				—				700.00				1/19/2016
			1,000				2,000	(3)			16.30				11/19/2023
Total			11,930				2,000
James Woodyatt			2,143				—				1,925.00				1/10/2017
			1,000				0				78.80				4/14/2021
			1,000				2,000	(3)			16.30				11/19/2023
Total			4,143				2,000

Director Compensation

The Company compensates our non-employee directors on a negotiated basis including expenses for their service. Each of these directors received compensation in the amount of $15,000 annually payable quarterly or the same value in shares of the Company, based on the director’s determination. In addition, they received awards of 1,429 options in September of 2012 with a strike price of $157.50 and 1,000 in November of 2013 with a strike price of $16.30. Each award has a vesting schedule of one-third vesting each year on the anniversary date over three (3) years. No options were awarded in 2014.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The table below summarizes the compensation earned by our non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

Name		Fees earned or paid in cash ($)				Stock Awards ($)				Option Awards ($)				Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($)				Change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings ($)				All Other Compensation ($)				Total ($)
Gary Cuccio			15,000				0				0				0				0				0				15,000
Kenneth Hoffman			0				15,000				0				0				0				0				15,000
Raymond Sidney			0				15,000				0				0				0				0				15,000
Larry Townes			0				15,000				0				0				0				0				15,000

Pension Benefits

We do not have any defined pension plans.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

Our executive employment agreements do not call for any potential payments upon termination or change in control.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of August 11, 2015 by (a) each stockholder who is known to us to own beneficially 5% or more of our outstanding common stock; (b) all directors; (c) our executive officers, and (d) all executive officers and directors as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, all persons listed below have (i) sole voting power and investment power with respect to their shares of common stock, except to the extent that authority is shared by spouses under applicable law, and (ii) record and beneficial ownership with respect to their shares of common stock.

For purposes of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of August 11, 2015. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of our common stock held by each person or group of persons named above, any shares of common stock that such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days of August 11, 2015 is deemed to be outstanding, but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The inclusion herein of any shares of common stock listed as beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership. Unless otherwise identified, the address of our directors and officers is c/o xG Technology, Inc., 240 S. Pineapple Avenue, Suite 701, Sarasota, Florida 34236.

Name and address of beneficial owner:		Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership				Percent of class of Common Stock(1)
5% Stockholders:
MB Technology Holdings, LLC (“MBTH”)(2)			1,247,410				23.36	%
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
George F. Schmitt(3)			1,583,342				29.30	%
John C. Coleman(4)			15,343					*
Roger G. Branton(5)			1,296,822				24.21	%
James Woodyatt(6)			6,650					*
Belinda Marino(7)			1,312					*
Gary Cuccio(8)			3,969					*
Richard L. Mooers(9)			1,334,265				24.85	%
Ken Hoffman(10)			5,518					*
Raymond M. Sidney(11)			5,518					*
General James T. Conway			—				—
All executive officers and directors as a group (10 persons):			1,757,919				32.18	%

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Other than compensation arrangements, the following is a description of transactions to which we were a participant or will be a participant to, in which:

Our Audit Committee considers and approves or disapproves any related person transaction as required by NASDAQ regulations.

Assumption of liabilities by MBTH

Roger Branton, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, and George Schmitt, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman, are directors of MBTH, and Richard Mooers, a director of the Company, is the CEO and a director of MBTH. During the year ended December 31, 2014, MBTH did not fund any additional liabilities on behalf of the Company under the 2011 assumption of liability agreement with MBTH. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company repaid MBTH $280,000 for liabilities previously paid by MBTH and the balance due to MBTH under the 2011 assumption of liability agreement was $931,000 as of December 31, 2014 which is included in due to related parties.

On April 29, 2014, the Company entered into a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with MBTH, pursuant to which MBTH agreed to provide certain management and financial services to the Company for a monthly fee of $25,000. The Management Agreement was effective January 1, 2014. The Company incurred fees related to the Management Agreement of $300,000 and $0, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company paid $225,000 of the fees under the Management Agreement and the remaining $75,000 was included in due to related parties at December 31, 2014.

In December 2014, MBTH loaned the Company $50,000 for payroll related expenses. This balance was included in due to related parties.

The Company agreed to award MBTH a 3% cash success fee if MBTH arranges financing for the Company or arranges a merger, consolidation or sale by the Company of substantially all of the assets. On February 24, 2015, MBTH invoiced the Company for $700,000 in fees associated with equity financings through April 16, 2014 at a rate of 3% per financing less certain discounts. The Company also accrued for an additional fee of approximately $109,000 for equity financings between April 17, 2014 and December 31, 2014. The balance of $809,000 was recorded as an expense in general and administrative expenses and included in due to related parties. As of August 11, 2015, the balance due to MBTH is $250,634.

Issuance of common stock to MBTH

On February 24, 2015, the company issued 399,114 shares of common stock to MBTH in consideration of converting $1,756,098 owed of the balance due to related parties at a conversion price of $4.40 per share.

George Schmitt — Due to Related Party

On December 30, 2014, the Company received a $245,000 loan from George Schmitt, Chairman of the Board and, effective as of February 17, 2015, Chief Executive Officer. This amount was recorded in due to related parties.

On January 8, 2015, the Company repaid $100,000 of the $245,000 due to related party balance owed to George Schmitt.

On January 29, 2015 and February 13, 2015, the Company received an aggregate of $700,000 from certain family members of George Schmitt, Chairman of the Board and, effective as of February 17, 2015, Chief Executive Officer. This amount was recorded as a short term loan in due to related parties. On February 23, 2015, George Schmitt transferred the balance of his $145,000 loan to certain family members bringing the total the Company owed to certain family members to $845,000. The $845,000 loan was settled

TABLE OF CONTENTS

through the issuance of 845,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, 5,310 shares of common stock and warrants with respect to 42,250 underlying shares of common stock exercisable for five years at a price of $20.00 per share.

On February 24, 2015, the 845,000 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock issued to certain family members of George Schmitt and 59,150 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock issued as dividends were converted into 222,792 shares of our common stock (See Note 10 Preferred Stock). As of March 31, 2015 none of the Series B Preferred Stock issued to certain family members of George Schmitt remained outstanding.

From April 1, 2015 to August 11, 2015, the Company received a total of $1,010,000 in loans from George Schmitt, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. This amount was recorded in due to related parties.

Mooers Branton & Co., Incorporated

On March 2, 2006, the Company entered into a management agreement (the “MBC Management Agreement”) with Mooers Branton & Co. Incorporated (“MBC”), a Florida corporation, pursuant to which MBC agreed to provide certain management and financial services to the Company for a monthly fee of $80,000. The MBC Management Agreement was terminated on January 1, 2014. The Company incurred fees related to the MBC Management Agreement of $0 and $720,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. MBC is beneficially controlled and operated by Richard Mooers, a director and Roger Branton, the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company.

MB Technology Holdings, LLC

On April 29, 2014, the Company entered into a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with MB Technology Holdings, LLC (“MBTH”), pursuant to which MBTH agreed to provide certain management and financial services to the Company for a monthly fee of $25,000. The Management Agreement was effective January 1, 2014. The Company incurred fees related to the Management Agreement of $300,000 and $0, respectively, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. As of August 11, 2015, MBTH owned approximately 23.36% of the Company’s outstanding shares. Roger Branton, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, and George Schmitt, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman, are directors of MBTH, and Richard Mooers, a director of the Company, is the CEO and a director of MBTH.

Subsidiaries of Townes Tele-Communications, Inc. (“Townes Tele-Communications”)

On October 16, 2013, the Company completed the first delivery of xMax comprehensive cognitive radio system, shipping equipment and providing engineering services required to fulfill the $179,000 purchase order that was received from rural broadband provider Walnut Hill Telephone Company on November 26, 2012. Larry Townes is Chairman of Townes Tele-Communications, Inc., the parent company of Walnut Hill Telephone Company. Given that Larry Townes was a director of xG Technology, at the time of the purchase order, the sale of equipment to Walnut Hill Telephone Company was, at the time it was entered into, considered to be a related party transaction. Due to Walnut Hill Telephone Company waiting for the equipment to meet certain technical specifications, the revenue from this transaction is considered deferred revenue as of December 31, 2014.

On December 16, 2013, the Company sold xMax comprehensive cognitive radio system to Haxtun Telephone Company for $301,000 to fulfill a purchase order that was received on November 24, 2012. Larry Townes is Chairman of Townes Tele-Communications, Inc., the parent company of Haxtun Telephone Company. Given that Larry Townes was a director of xG Technology, at the time of the purchase order, the sale of equipment to Haxtun Telephone Company was, at the time it was entered into, considered to be a related party transaction. Due to Haxtun Telephone Company waiting for the equipment to meet certain technical specifications, the revenue from this transaction is considered deferred revenue as of December 31, 2014.

On March 31, 2015, we shipped additional equipment purchased by Larry Townes and we received a partial payment for the equipment that had been previously delivered in those transactions as the purchasers

TABLE OF CONTENTS

indicated that the equipment met certain technical specifications associated with their networks. Previously, Walnut Hill Telephone Company and Haxtun Telephone Company did not intend to deliver payment until such technical specifications were satisfied. These specifications have now been satisfied and the deferred revenue has been recorded as revenue.

Any transactions subsequent to Larry Townes resigning will not be considered related party transactions.

Itellum, LLC

In May 2015, we announced we received an order for approximately $100,000 in xMax mobile broadband wireless equipment and services which will be deployed in a network to be initially installed in Escazu, Costa Rica, with plans to expand in other Latin American locations. The xMax equipment order was received from Itellum, LLC (“Itellum”), a related party, one of four companies who have entered into a formal agreement to participate in the initial xMax deployment as well as expansion into other Latin American markets thereafter. The other partners include Level 3 Communications (“Level 3”), Osmin Vargas Corporacion (“OV”), and MB Technology Holdings, LLC (“MBTH”), a related party. The xMax broadband wireless networking equipment will include compact, high-performance access points, fixed and mobile personal WiFi hotspot devices and mobile control switching centers. In June 2015, we announced the successful installation and initial deployment of an xMax broadband network in Escazu, Costa Rica by Itellum. This represents the first stage of xMax network deployments that are expected to cover additional areas of Costa Rica, with plans for expansion into other Latin American locations. In June 2015, we announced that we received an additional order for approximately $58,000 in xMax mobile broadband wireless equipment and services from Itellum.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

General

The following description of our capital stock and certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws are summaries and are qualified by reference to the amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the amended and restated bylaws. Copies of these documents will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.00001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, of which 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock were designated as the Series A Preferred Stock, 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock were designated as the Series B Preferred Stock, and 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock were designated as the Series C Preferred Stock. As of August 11, 2015, we had 5,128,883 shares of common stock outstanding.

On July 17, 2015 the Company effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split and every ten (10) shares of outstanding common stock decreased to one (1) share of common stock. Similarly, the number of shares of common stock into which each outstanding option, convertible note and warrant to purchase common stock is to be exercisable or convert into decreased on a 1-for-10 basis and the exercise price or conversion price of each outstanding option, convertible note and warrant to purchase common stock increased proportionately.

Common Stock

Voting Rights

Each stockholder has one vote for each share of common stock held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. A stockholder may vote in person or by proxy. Elections of directors are determined by a plurality of the votes cast and all other matters are decided by a majority of the votes cast by those stockholders entitled to vote and present in person or by proxy.

Because our stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights, stockholders holding a majority of the voting power of our shares of common stock will be able to elect all of our directors. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provides that stockholder actions may be effected at a duly called meeting of stockholders or pursuant to written consent of the majority of stockholders. A special meeting of stockholders may be called by the majority of our board of directors or by a committee determined by the board of directors with power to call such meetings.

Dividend Rights

The holders of outstanding shares of common stock are entitled to receive dividends out of funds legally available at the times and in the amounts that our board may determine, provided that required dividends, if any, on preferred stock have been paid or provided for. However, to date we have not paid or declared cash distributions or dividends on our common stock and do not currently intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain all earnings, if and when generated, to finance our operations. The declaration of cash dividends in the future will be determined by the board based upon our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other relevant factors.

No Preemptive or Similar Rights

Holders of our common stock do not have preemptive rights, and our common stock is not convertible or redeemable.

Right to Receive Liquidation Distributions

Upon our dissolution, liquidation or winding-up, the assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders and remaining after payment to holders of preferred stock of the amounts, if any, to which they are entitled, are distributable ratably among the holders of our common stock subject to any senior class of securities.

Preferred Stock

As of August 11, 2015, 0 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock are outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Series A Warrants

The following summary of certain terms and provisions of the Series A Warrants that are being offered hereby is not complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by the provisions of, the Series A Warrant, the form of which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Prospective investors should carefully review the terms and provisions of the form of Series A Warrant for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Series A Warrants.

Duration and Exercise Price.  The Series A Warrants offered hereby will entitle the holders thereof to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,392,820 shares of our common stock at an initial exercise price of $1.55 per share, commencing immediately on the date of issuance and expiring on the fifth anniversary of the initial date of issuance. The Series A Warrants will be issued separately from the common stock included in the Class A Units and the Pre-funded Series B Warrants included in the Class B Units, and may be transferred separately immediately thereafter. If the Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants described below are exercised in full, we will issue additional Series A Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,089,230 shares of our common stock. All Series A Warrants will have the same expiration date.

Anti-Dilution Adjustments.  The exercise price of the Series A Warrants is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of stock dividends, stock splits, reorganizations or similar events affecting our common stock. The exercise price of the Series A Warrants is also subject to anti-dilution adjustments for any issuance of common stock or rights to acquire common stock for consideration per share less than the exercise price of the Series A Warrants. For purposes of these adjustments, dilutive issuances do not include securities issued under existing instruments, under board-approved equity incentive plans or in certain strategic transactions. Additionally, the exercise of the Series B Warrants, Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants (each as described below) will not trigger any anti-dilution adjustments for the Series A Warrants.

Cashless Exercise.  If, at the time a holder exercises its Series A Warrant, there is no effective registration statement registering, or the prospectus contained therein is not available for an issuance of, the shares underlying the Series A Warrant to the holder, then in lieu of making the cash payment otherwise contemplated to be made to us upon such exercise in payment of the aggregate exercise price, the holder may elect instead to receive upon such exercise (either in whole or in part) the net number of shares of common stock determined according to a formula set forth in the Series A Warrant.

Fundamental Transactions.  If, at any time while the Series A Warrants are outstanding, (A) the Company, directly or indirectly, in one or more related transactions, (i) consolidates or merges with or into (whether or not the Company is the surviving corporation) another person, or (ii) sells, assigns, transfers, conveys or otherwise disposes of all or substantially all of the properties or assets of the Company to any other person, or (iii) makes, or allows any other person to make a purchase, tender or exchange offer that is accepted by the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock (not including any shares of common stock held by the person(s) making or party to, or affiliated with any of the persons making or party to, such purchase, tender or exchange offer); or (iv) consummates a stock or share purchase agreement or other business combination (including, without limitation, a reorganization, recapitalization, spin-off or scheme of arrangement) with any other person whereby such other person acquires more than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock (not including any shares of common stock held by the person(s) making or party to, or affiliated with any of the persons making or party to, such stock purchase agreement or other business combination), or (v) reorganizes, recapitalizes or reclassifies its common stock, (B) the Company, directly or indirectly, through one or more related transactions, allows any person or group to be or become the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the aggregate voting power represented by issued and outstanding common stock, or (C) the Company, directly or indirectly, through one or more related transactions, issues or enters into any other instrument or transaction structured in a manner to circumvent, or that circumvents, the intent of this definition, in which case this definition shall be construed and implemented in a manner to correct this definition or any portion of this definition which may be defective or inconsistent with the intended treatment of such instrument or transaction (each, a “Fundamental Transaction”), then each holder shall have the right thereafter to receive, upon exercise of a Series A Warrant, the same amount and kind of securities, cash or property as such holder would have been entitled to receive upon the occurrence of such Fundamental Transaction if the holder had been, immediately prior to such Fundamental Transaction, the holder of the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

number of shares of common stock then issuable upon exercise of the Series A Warrant. Any successor to us, surviving entity or the corporation purchasing or otherwise acquiring such assets shall assume the obligation to deliver to the holder such alternate consideration, and the other obligations, under the Series A Warrant. Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, in the event of any Fundamental Transaction, the holders of the Series A Warrants will be entitled to receive, in lieu of our shares and at the holders’ option, cash in an amount equal to the Black Scholes Value (as defined in the form of Series A Warrant) of the remaining unexercised portion of the Series A Warrant on the date of the transaction.

Transferability.  The Series A Warrants may be transferred at the option of the Series A Warrant holder upon surrender of the Series A Warrants with the appropriate instruments of transfer.

Exchange Listing.  We do not plan on making an application to list the Series A Warrants on any national securities exchange or other nationally recognized trading system.

Exercisability.  The Series A Warrants will be exercisable, at the option of each holder, in whole or in part, by delivering to us a duly executed exercise notice accompanied by payment in full for the number of shares of our common stock purchased upon such exercise (except in the case of a cashless exercise as discussed above). A holder (together with its affiliates) may not exercise any portion of the warrant to the extent that the holder would beneficially own more than 9.99% of our outstanding common stock after exercise. The holder may increase or decrease this beneficial ownership limitation to any other percentage of our common stock outstanding immediately after the exercise not in excess of 9.99%, upon, in the case of an increase, not less than 61 days’ prior written notice to us.

Waivers and Amendments. Subject to certain exceptions, the terms of a Series A Warrant may be amended or waived only with the written consent of the holder.

Pre-funded Series B Warrants

The following summary of certain terms and provisions of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants that are being offered hereby is not complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by the provisions of, the Pre-funded Series B Warrant, the form of which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Prospective investors should carefully review the terms and provisions of the form of Pre-funded Series B Warrant for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants.

We are offering to investors the opportunity to purchase Class B Units, which differ from the Class A Units in that they contain Pre-funded Series B Warrants rather than shares of common stock. The per unit public offering price of the Class B Units containing the Pre-funded Series B Warrants is equal to the per unit public offering price of the Class A Units, less the $0.01 per share exercise price of the Pre-funded Series B Warrant included in the Class B Unit. The term “pre-funded” refers to the fact that the purchase price of the Class B Units in this offering includes almost the entire exercise price that will be paid under the Pre-funded Series B Warrants, except for a nominal remaining exercise price of $0.01. The purpose of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants is to enable investors that may have restrictions on their ability to beneficially own more than 9.99% of our outstanding common stock following the consummation of this offering the opportunity to invest capital into the Company without triggering their ownership restrictions, by receiving Pre-funded Series B Warrants in lieu of the shares contained in the Class A Units which would result in such ownership of more than 9.99%, and receive the ability to exercise their option to purchase the shares underlying the Pre-funded Series B Warrants at such nominal price at a later date. Pre-funded Series B Warrants that expire unexercised will have no further value and the holder of such warrant will lose the pre-funded amount.

Duration and Exercise Price.  The Pre-funded Series B Warrants offered hereby will entitle the holders thereof to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,773,300 shares of our common stock at a nominal exercise price of $0.01 per share, commencing immediately on the date of issuance and expiring on the fifth anniversary of the initial date of issuance. The Pre-funded Series B Warrants will be issued separately from the common stock included in the Class A Units and the Series A Warrants included in the Class B Units, and may be transferred separately immediately thereafter.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Certain Adjustments.  The exercise price of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of stock dividends, stock splits, reorganizations or similar events affecting our common stock.

Cashless Exercise.  If, at the time a holder exercises its Pre-funded Series B Warrants, there is no effective registration statement registering, or the prospectus contained therein is not available for an issuance of, the shares underlying the Pre-funded Series B Warrants to the holder, then in lieu of making the cash payment otherwise contemplated to be made to us upon such exercise in payment of the aggregate exercise price, the holder may elect instead to receive upon such exercise (either in whole or in part) the net number of shares of common stock determined according to a formula set forth in the Pre-funded Series B Warrants.

Fundamental Transactions.  If, at any time while the Pre-funded Series B Warrants are outstanding, (A) the Company, directly or indirectly, in one or more related transactions, enters into a Fundamental Transaction (as defined above), then each holder shall have the right thereafter to receive, upon exercise of a Pre-funded Series B Warrants, the same amount and kind of securities, cash or property as such holder would have been entitled to receive upon the occurrence of such Fundamental Transaction if the holder had been, immediately prior to such Fundamental Transaction, the holder of the number of shares of common stock then issuable upon exercise of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants. Any successor to us, surviving entity or the corporation purchasing or otherwise acquiring such assets shall assume the obligation to deliver to the holder such alternate consideration, and the other obligations, under the Pre-funded Series B Warrants. Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, in the event of any Fundamental Transaction, the holders of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants will be entitled to receive, in lieu of our shares and at the holders’ option, cash in an amount equal to the Black Scholes Value (as defined in the form of Pre-funded Series B Warrant) of the remaining unexercised portion of the Pre-funded Series B Warrant on the date of the transaction.

Transferability.  The Pre-funded Series B Warrants may be transferred at the option of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants holder upon surrender of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants with the appropriate instruments of transfer.

Exchange Listing.  We do not plan on making an application to list the Pre-funded Series B Warrants on any national securities exchange or other nationally recognized trading system.

Exercisability.  The Pre-funded Series B Warrants will be exercisable, at the option of each holder, in whole or in part, by delivering to us a duly executed exercise notice accompanied by payment in full for the number of shares of our common stock purchased upon such exercise (except in the case of a cashless exercise as discussed above). A holder (together with its affiliates) may not exercise any portion of the warrant to the extent that the holder would beneficially own more than 9.99% of our outstanding common stock after exercise. The holder may increase or decrease this beneficial ownership limitation to any other percentage of our common stock outstanding immediately after the exercise not in excess of 9.99%, upon, in the case of an increase, not less than 61 days’ prior written notice to us.

Waivers and Amendments.  Subject to certain exceptions, the terms of a Pre-funded Series B Warrant may be amended or waived only with the written consent of the holder.

Series C Warrants

The following summary of certain terms and provisions of the Series C Warrants that are being offered hereby is not complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by the provisions of, the Series C Warrant, the form of which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Prospective investors should carefully review the terms and provisions of the form of Series C Warrant for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Series C Warrants.

Duration and Exercise Price.  The Series C Warrants offered hereby entitle the holders thereof to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,518,510 additional Class A Units. The Series C Warrants are exercisable immediately at an initial exercise price of $1.55 per Class A Unit, subject to adjustment as described below. Beginning at the close of trading on the 60^th trading day following the date of issuance, and effective beginning on the third trading day immediately preceding such 60^th trading day, the Series C Warrants will be exercisable at an exercise price per Class A Unit equal to the lowest of (i) the then-effective exercise price per Class A Unit, (ii) 80% of the closing price of our common stock on such

TABLE OF CONTENTS

60^th trading day and (iii) 80% of the average of the VWAP for the three (3) trading days ending and including the 60^th trading day following the date of issuance. If a holder of Series C Warrants exercises such warrants between the third trading day immediately preceding such 60^th trading day and the 60^th trading day in accordance with (i) above and subsequently the Exercise Price is adjusted as determined in accordance with (ii) or (iii) above, the Company will reimburse the Holder for the difference, within five (5) trading days following the 60^th trading day. The Series C Warrants will expire at the close of business at 5:00 p.m. (New York time) on the 65^th trading day following the date of issuance. Although being offered simultaneously in this offering, the Series C Warrants will be issued separately from the common stock and the Series A Warrants included in the Class A Units, the Pre-funded Series B Warrants and Series A Warrants included in the Class B Units, and the Series D Warrants, and may be transferred separately immediately thereafter. Series C Warrants will be issued in certificated form only.

Certain Adjustments.  The exercise price of the Series C Warrants is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of stock dividends, stock splits, reorganizations or similar events affecting our common stock.

Cashless Exercise.  If, at the time a holder exercises its Series C Warrant, there is no effective registration statement registering, or the prospectus contained therein is not available for an issuance of, the securities underlying the Series C Warrant to the holder, then in lieu of making the cash payment otherwise contemplated to be made to us upon such exercise in payment of the aggregate exercise price, the holder may elect instead to receive upon such exercise (either in whole or in part) the net number of securities determined according to a formula set forth in the Series C Warrant.

Fundamental Transactions.  If, at any time while the Series C Warrants are outstanding, (A) the Company, directly or indirectly, in one or more related transactions, enters into a Fundamental Transaction, then each holder shall have the right thereafter to receive, upon exercise of a Series C Warrant, the same amount and kind of securities, cash or property as such holder would have been entitled to receive upon the occurrence of such Fundamental Transaction if the holder had been, immediately prior to such Fundamental Transaction, the holder of the number of securities then issuable upon exercise of the Series C Warrant. Any successor to us, surviving entity or the corporation purchasing or otherwise acquiring such assets shall assume the obligation to deliver to the holder such alternate consideration, and the other obligations, under the Series C Warrant. Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, in the event of any Fundamental Transaction, the holders of the Series C Warrants will be entitled to receive, in lieu of our shares and at the holders’ option, cash in an amount equal to the Black Scholes Value (as defined in the form of Series C Warrant) of the remaining unexercised portion of the Series C Warrant on the date of the transaction.

Transferability.  The Series C Warrants may be transferred at the option of the Series C Warrant holder upon surrender of the Series C Warrants with the appropriate instruments of transfer.

Exchange Listing.  We do not plan on making an application to list the Series C Warrants on any national securities exchange or other nationally recognized trading system.

Exercisability.  The Series C Warrants will be exercisable, at the option of each holder, in whole or in part, by delivering to us a duly executed exercise notice accompanied by payment in full for the number of securities purchased upon such exercise (except in the case of a cashless exercise as discussed above). A holder (together with its affiliates) may not exercise any portion of the warrant to the extent that the holder would beneficially own more than 9.99% of our outstanding common stock after exercise. The holder may increase or decrease this beneficial ownership limitation to any other percentage of our common stock outstanding immediately after the exercise not in excess of 9.99%, upon, in the case of an increase, not less than 61 days’ prior written notice to us.

Waivers and Amendments.  Subject to certain exceptions, the terms of a Series C Warrant may be amended or waived only with the written consent of the holder.

Series D Warrants

The following summary of certain terms and provisions of the Series D Warrants that are being offered hereby is not complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by the provisions of, the Series D Warrant, the form of which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus

TABLE OF CONTENTS

is a part. Prospective investors should carefully review the terms and provisions of the form of Series D Warrant for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Series D Warrants.

Duration and Exercise Price.  The Series D Warrants offered hereby entitle the holders thereof to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,659,950 additional Class B Units. The Series D Warrants are exercisable immediately at an initial exercise price of $1.54 per Class B Unit, subject to adjustment as described below. Beginning at the close of trading on the 60^th trading day following the date of issuance, and effective beginning on the third trading day immediately preceding such 60^th trading day, the Series D Warrants will be exercisable at an exercise price per Class B Unit equal to the lowest of (i) the then-effective exercise price per Class B Unit, (ii) 80% of the closing price of our common stock on such 60^th trading day and (iii) 80% of the average of the VWAP for the three (3) trading days ending and including the 60^th trading day following the date of issuance. If a holder of Series D Warrants exercises such warrants between the third trading day immediately preceding such 60^th trading day and the 60^th trading day in accordance with (i) above and subsequently the Exercise Price is adjusted as determined in accordance with (ii) or (iii) above, the Company will reimburse the Holder for the difference, within five (5) trading days following the 60^th trading day. The Series D Warrants will expire at the close of business at 5:00 p.m. (New York time) on the 65^th trading day following the date of issuance. Although being offered simultaneously in this offering, the Series D Warrants will be issued separately from the common stock and the Series A Warrants included in the Class A Units, the Pre-funded Series B Warrants and Series A Warrants included in the Class B Units, and the Series C Warrants, and may be transferred separately immediately thereafter. Series D Warrants will be issued in certificated form only.

Certain Adjustments.  The exercise price of the Series D Warrants is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of stock dividends, stock splits, reorganizations or similar events affecting our common stock.

Cashless Exercise.  If, at the time a holder exercises its Series D Warrant, there is no effective registration statement registering, or the prospectus contained therein is not available for an issuance of, the securities underlying the Series D Warrant to the holder, then in lieu of making the cash payment otherwise contemplated to be made to us upon such exercise in payment of the aggregate exercise price, the holder may elect instead to receive upon such exercise (either in whole or in part) the net number of securities determined according to a formula set forth in the Series D Warrant.

Fundamental Transactions.  If, at any time while the Series D Warrants are outstanding, (A) the Company, directly or indirectly, in one or more related transactions, enters into a Fundamental Transaction, then each holder shall have the right thereafter to receive, upon exercise of a Series D Warrant, the same amount and kind of securities, cash or property as such holder would have been entitled to receive upon the occurrence of such Fundamental Transaction if the holder had been, immediately prior to such Fundamental Transaction, the holder of the number of securities then issuable upon exercise of the Series D Warrant. Any successor to us, surviving entity or the corporation purchasing or otherwise acquiring such assets shall assume the obligation to deliver to the holder such alternate consideration, and the other obligations, under the Series D Warrant. Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, in the event of any Fundamental Transaction, the holders of the Series D Warrants will be entitled to receive, in lieu of our shares and at the holders’ option, cash in an amount equal to the Black Scholes Value (as defined in the form of Series D Warrant) of the remaining unexercised portion of the Series D Warrant on the date of the transaction.

Transferability.  The Series D Warrants may be transferred at the option of the Series D Warrant holder upon surrender of the Series D Warrants with the appropriate instruments of transfer.

Exchange Listing.  We do not plan on making an application to list the Series D Warrants on any national securities exchange or other nationally recognized trading system.

Exercisability.  The Series D Warrants will be exercisable, at the option of each holder, in whole or in part, by delivering to us a duly executed exercise notice accompanied by payment in full for the number of securities purchased upon such exercise (except in the case of a cashless exercise as discussed above). A holder (together with its affiliates) may not exercise any portion of the warrant to the extent that the holder would beneficially own more than 9.99% of our outstanding common stock after exercise. The holder may increase or decrease this beneficial ownership limitation to any other percentage of our common stock

TABLE OF CONTENTS

outstanding immediately after the exercise not in excess of 9.99%, upon, in the case of an increase, not less than 61 days’ prior written notice to us.

Waivers and Amendments.  Subject to certain exceptions, the terms of a Series D Warrant may be amended or waived only with the written consent of the holder.

Options and Warrants

As of August 11, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock as set forth in the table below:

		August 7, 2015 Number of options and warrants				December 31, 2014 Number of options and warrants
At January 1			557,997				522,915
Granted			383,250				48,260
Forfeited or Expired			(17,388	)			(13,178	)
Exercised			—				—
Unexercised as at August 11, 2015 and December 31, 2014			923,859				557,997

The weighted average exercise prices as of August 11, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were $59.00 and $96.78, respectively.

Anti-Takeover Provisions

Since our board of directors has the power to retain and discharge our officers, these provisions could make it more difficult for existing stockholders or another party to effect a change in management. In addition, the authorization of undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to change our control.

These provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood of continued stability in the composition of our board of directors and its policies and to discourage certain types of transactions that may involve an actual or threatened acquisition of us.

These provisions are also designed to reduce our vulnerability to an unsolicited acquisition proposal and to discourage certain tactics that may be used in proxy fights. However, such provisions could have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our shares and may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in our control or management. As a consequence, these provisions also may inhibit fluctuations in the market price of our stock that could result from actual or rumored takeover attempts.

Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law

We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any “business combination” with any interested stockholder for a period of three years after the date that such stockholder became an interested stockholder, with the following exceptions:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In general, Section 203 defines business combination to include the following:

In general, Section 203 defines an “interested stockholder” as an entity or person who, together with the person’s affiliates and associates, beneficially owns, or within three years prior to the time of determination of interested stockholder status did own, 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Our transfer agent and registrar for our common stock in the United States is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

Future sales of our common stock in the public market, or the availability of such shares for sale in the public market, could adversely affect market prices prevailing from time to time. As described below, only a limited number of shares will be available for sale shortly after this offering due to contractual and legal restrictions on resale. Nevertheless, sales of our common stock in the public market after such restrictions lapse, or the perception that those sales may occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price at such time and our ability to raise equity capital in the future.

Our common stock has traded on NASDAQ since July 19, 2013.

Based on the number of shares outstanding as of August 11, 2015, upon the closing of this offering 7,914,523 shares of common stock, assuming the full exercise of the Pre-funded Series B Warrants underlying the Class B Units, will be issued and outstanding, and assuming no exercise of outstanding options or warrants. Of the outstanding shares, all of the shares sold in this offering will be freely tradable, except that any shares held by our affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act, may only be sold in compliance with the limitations described below.

Shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering are restricted securities as such term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act and/or are subject to lock-up agreements as described below. Following the expiration of the lock-up period in such agreements, restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if registered or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under the Securities Act, as described in greater detail below.

Rule 144

In general, under Rule 144, a person who has beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock for at least six months would be entitled to sell their securities provided that (i) such person is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates at the time of, or at any time during the 90 days preceding, a sale and (ii) we have been subject to the Exchange Act, periodic reporting requirements for at least 90 days before the sale. Persons who have beneficially owned restricted shares of our common stock for at least six months but who are our affiliates at the time of, or any time during the 90 days preceding, a sale, would be subject to volume restrictions, by which such person would be entitled to sell within any three-month period only a number of securities that does not exceed the greater of either of the following:

Provided, in each case, that we have been subject to and are current with the Exchange Act periodic reporting requirements for at least 90 days before the sale. Sales by affiliates must also comply with the manner of sale and notice provisions of Rule 144.

Rule 701

Rule 701 under the Securities Act permits resales of shares in reliance upon Rule 144 but without compliance with certain restrictions of Rule 144, including the holding period requirement. Most of our employees, executive officers, directors or consultants who purchased shares under a written compensatory plan or contract may be entitled to rely on the resale provisions of Rule 701, but all holders of Rule 701 shares are required to wait until 90 days after the date of this prospectus before selling their shares. However, substantially all Rule 701 shares are subject to lock-up agreements as described below and under “Underwriting” and will become eligible for sale at the expiration of those agreements.

Employees can only sell vested shares. Employees who do not hold vested shares, including shares subject to options, upon expiration of these selling restrictions will not be able to sell shares until they vest.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lock-Up Arrangements

We have agreed with the Representative that for a period of 90 days following the date of this prospectus, we will not offer, sell, assign, transfer, pledge, contract to sell or otherwise dispose of, or hedge, any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock, subject to specified exceptions. The Representative may, in its sole discretion, waive this prohibition. The restriction is not applicable to shares issuable upon conversion or exercise of any existing securities.

In addition, all officers and directors and their affiliates have agreed not to sell any shares beneficially owned by them for a period of 90 days from the effective date of this Registration Statement.

Registration Rights

There are no shareholders who have any right to request registration of their shares.

Stock Incentive Plans

We have filed three (3) Form S-8 registration statements under the Securities Act to register shares of our common stock issued or reserved for issuance under some of our stock incentive plans and agreements. This registration statement will become effective immediately upon filing, and shares covered by this registration statement will thereupon be eligible for sale in the public markets, subject to vesting restrictions, and Rule 144 limitations applicable to affiliates.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNDERWRITING

Roth Capital Partners, LLC is acting as book-running manager of the offering and as representative of the underwriter (the “Representative”). We have entered into an underwriting agreement, dated           , 2015, with the Representative. Subject to the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement, we have agreed to sell to the underwriter, at the public offering price per Class A Unit, Class B Unit, Series C Warrant and Series D Warrant less the underwriting discounts and commissions (where applicable) set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, the number of Class A Units, Class B Units, Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants listed next to its name in the following table:

Underwriter		Number of Class A Units				Number of Class B Units				Number of Series C Warrants				Number of Series D Warrants
Roth Capital Partners, LLC			1,012,340				1,773,300				1,518,510				2,659,950
Total			1,012,340				1,773,300				1,518,510				2,659,950

The underwriter is committed to purchase all the Class A Units, Class B Units, Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants offered by us if any of the Class A Units, Class B Units, Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants are purchased. The obligations of the underwriter may be terminated upon the occurrence of certain events specified in the underwriting agreement. Furthermore, pursuant to the underwriting agreement, the underwriter’s obligations are subject to customary conditions, representations and warranties contained in the underwriting agreement, such as receipt by the underwriter of officers’ certificates and legal opinions and no material adverse change to our business.

We have agreed to indemnify the underwriter against specified liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and to contribute to payments the underwriter may be required to make in respect thereof.

The underwriter is simultaneously offering the Class A Units, Class B Units, Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants, subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued to and accepted by them, subject to approval of legal matters by its counsel and other conditions specified in the underwriting agreement. The underwriter reserves the right to withdraw, cancel or modify offers to the public and to reject orders in whole or in part.

Discounts and Commissions.  The following table shows the public offering prices of the Class A Units, Class B Units, Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants, the underwriting discounts and commissions (where applicable) and the proceeds to us, before expenses.

Per Class A Unit

Per Class B Unit

Per Series C Warrant

Per Series D Warrant

Total

Public offering price

$

$

$

$

$

Underwriting discounts and commissions

$

$

$

Proceeds to us, before expenses

$

$

$

$

$

We have agreed to reimburse the Representative for certain of its out-of-pocket expenses in an aggregate amount not to exceed $150,000. The underwriting agreement, however, provides that in the event this offering is terminated, the Representative will only be entitled to the reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses actually incurred in accordance with FINRA Rule 5110(f)(2)(D).

The underwriter proposes to offer the Class A Units, Class B Units, Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants offered by us to the public at the public offering prices set forth on the cover of this prospectus. In addition, the underwriter may offer some of the Class A Units, Class B Units, Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants to other securities dealers at such prices less a concession of $     per Class A Unit, $     per Class B Unit, $     per Series C Warrant and $     per Series D Warrant. If all of the Class A Units, Class B Units, Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants offered by us are not sold at the public offering price per Class A Unit, per Class B Unit, per Series C Warrant and per Series D Warrant, respectively, the underwriter may change the applicable public offering price and other selling terms by means of a supplement to this prospectus.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We estimate that the total expenses of the offering payable by us, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions, will be approximately $369,000.

We also have engaged the Representative to act as our exclusive agent for the solicitation of exercises of the Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants. In such capacity, the Representative will contact record and beneficial owners of the Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants, solicit such holders to exercise their Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants, assist such holders in effecting the exercise of their Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants and respond to appropriate questions and requests for assistance from such holders. We have agreed to pay the Representative a cash solicitation fee of 7% of the exercise price of the Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants exercised as a result of their solicitation services. As required by FINRA Rule 5110(f)(2)(K), no solicitation fee will be payable to the Representative with respect to the exercise of a Series C Warrant or Series D Warrant if:

The maximum total cash underwriter’s fee and cash solicitation fee payable to the Representative will not exceed a maximum of $795,502, assuming the offering of 1,012,340 Class A Units at a public offering price of $1.55 per Class A Unit, 1,773,300 Class B Units at a public offering price of $1.54 per Class B Unit and assuming the full exercise of the Series C Warrants and the Series D Warrants. In the event that not all of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants are exercised, the exercise price of the Series C Warrants is less than the public offering price per Class A Unit set forth on the cover page of this prospectus or the exercise price of the Series D Warrants is less than the public offering price per Class B Unit set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, the total cash underwriter’s fee and solicitation fee payable to the Representative would be reduced. The underwriters will not receive a discount or commission on the initial public sale of the Series C Warrants or Series D Warrants in this offering.

Electronic Offer, Sale and Distribution of Class A Units, Class B Units, Series C Warrants and Series D Warrants.  A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the websites maintained by one or more of the underwriter or selling group members, if any, participating in this offering and the underwriter participating in this offering may distribute prospectuses electronically. The Representative may agree to allocate a number of shares to the underwriter and selling group members for sale to their online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be allocated by the underwriter and selling group members that will make internet distributions on the same basis as other allocations. Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information on these websites is not part of, nor incorporated by reference into, this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved or endorsed by us or the underwriter in its capacity as underwriter, and should not be relied upon by investors.

Stabilization.  In connection with this offering, the underwriter may engage in stabilizing transactions, syndicate-covering transactions, penalty bids and purchases to cover positions created by short sales in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our shares of common stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our shares of common stock. As a result, the price of our common stock or warrants in the open market may be higher than it would otherwise be in the absence of these transactions. Neither we nor the underwriter make any representation or prediction as to the effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of our common stock. These transactions may be effected on The NASDAQ Capital Market, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.

Passive market making.  In connection with this offering, the underwriter and selling group members may engage in passive market making transactions in our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market in accordance with Rule 103 of Regulation M under the Exchange Act, during a period before the commencement of offers or sales of the shares and extending through the completion of the distribution. A passive market maker must display its bid at a price not in excess of the highest independent bid of that security. However, if all independent bids are lowered below the passive market maker’s bid, then that bid must then be lowered when specified purchase limits are exceeded.

Offer restrictions outside the United States

Other than in the United States, no action has been taken by us or the underwriter that would permit a public offering of the securities offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. The securities offered by this prospectus may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, nor may this prospectus or any other offering material or advertisements in connection with the offer and sale of any such securities be distributed or published in any jurisdiction, except under circumstances that will result in compliance with the applicable rules and regulations of that jurisdiction. Persons into whose possession this prospectus comes are advised to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to the offering and the distribution of this prospectus. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or a solicitation is unlawful.

Australia

This prospectus is not a disclosure document under Chapter 6D of the Australian Corporations Act, has not been lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and does not purport to include the information required of a disclosure document under Chapter 6D of the Australian Corporations Act. Accordingly, (i) the offer of the securities under this prospectus is only made to persons to whom it is lawful to offer the securities without disclosure under Chapter 6D of the Australian Corporations Act under one or more exemptions set out in section 708 of the Australian Corporations Act, (ii) this prospectus is made available in Australia only to those persons as set forth in clause (i) above, and (iii) the offeree must be sent a notice stating in substance that by accepting this offer, the offeree represents that the offeree is such a person as set forth in clause (i) above, and, unless permitted under the Australian Corporations Act, agrees not to sell or offer for sale within Australia any of the securities sold to the offeree within 12 months after its transfer for the offeree under this prospectus.

China

The information in this document does not constitute a public offer of the securities, whether by way of sale or subscription, in the People’s Republic of China (excluding, for purposes of this paragraph, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Macau Special Administrative Region and Taiwan). The securities may not be offered or sold directly or indirectly in the PRC to legal or natural persons other than directly to “qualified domestic institutional investors.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

European Economic Area — Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and Netherlands

The information in this document has been prepared on the basis that all offers of securities will be made pursuant to an exemption under the Directive 2003/71/EC (“Prospectus Directive”), as implemented in Member States of the European Economic Area (each, a “Relevant Member State”), from the requirement to produce a prospectus for offers of securities.

An offer to the public of securities has not been made, and may not be made, in a Relevant Member State except pursuant to one of the following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive as implemented in that Relevant Member State:

France

This document is not being distributed in the context of a public offering of financial securities (offre au public de titres financiers) in France within the meaning of Article L.411-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code (Code monétaire et financier) and Articles 211-1 et seq. of the General Regulation of the French Autorité des marchés financiers (“AMF”). The securities have not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the public in France.

This document and any other offering material relating to the securities have not been, and will not be, submitted to the AMF for approval in France and, accordingly, may not be distributed or caused to distributed, directly or indirectly, to the public in France.

Such offers, sales and distributions have been and shall only be made in France to (i) qualified investors (investisseurs qualifiés) acting for their own account, as defined in and in accordance with Articles L.411-2-II-2° and D.411-1 to D.411-3, D.744-1, D.754-1 and D.764-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code and any implementing regulation and/or (ii) a restricted number of non-qualified investors (cercle restreint d’investisseurs) acting for their own account, as defined in and in accordance with Articles L.411-2-II-2° and D.411-4, D.744-1, D.754-1 and D.764-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code and any implementing regulation.

Pursuant to Article 211-3 of the General Regulation of the AMF, investors in France are informed that the securities cannot be distributed (directly or indirectly) to the public by the investors otherwise than in accordance with Articles L.411-1, L.411-2, L.412-1 and L.621-8 to L.621-8-3 of the French Monetary and Financial Code.

Ireland

The information in this document does not constitute a prospectus under any Irish laws or regulations and this document has not been filed with or approved by any Irish regulatory authority as the information has not been prepared in the context of a public offering of securities in Ireland within the meaning of the Irish

Prospectus (Directive 2003/71/EC) Regulations 2005 (the “Prospectus Regulations”). The securities have not been offered or sold, and will not be offered, sold or delivered directly or indirectly in Ireland by way of a public offering, except to (i) qualified investors as defined in Regulation 2(l) of the Prospectus Regulations and (ii) fewer than 100 natural or legal persons who are not qualified investors.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Israel

The securities offered by this prospectus have not been approved or disapproved by the Israeli Securities Authority, or the ISA, nor have such securities been registered for sale in Israel. The shares may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the public in Israel, absent the publication of a prospectus. The ISA has not issued permits, approvals or licenses in connection with the offering or publishing the prospectus; nor has it authenticated the details included herein, confirmed their reliability or completeness, or rendered an opinion as to the quality of the securities being offered. Any resale in Israel, directly or indirectly, to the public of the securities offered by this prospectus is subject to restrictions on transferability and must be effected only in compliance with the Israeli securities laws and regulations.

Italy

The offering of the securities in the Republic of Italy has not been authorized by the Italian Securities and Exchange Commission (Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa, “CONSOB”, pursuant to the Italian securities legislation and, accordingly, no offering material relating to the securities may be distributed in Italy and such securities may not be offered or sold in Italy in a public offer within the meaning of Article 1.1(t) of Legislative Decree No. 58 of 24 February 1998 (“Decree No. 58”), other than:

Any offer, sale or delivery of the securities or distribution of any offer document relating to the securities in Italy (excluding placements where a Qualified Investor solicits an offer from the issuer) under the paragraphs above must be:

Any subsequent distribution of the securities in Italy must be made in compliance with the public offer and prospectus requirement rules provided under Decree No. 58 and the Regulation No. 11971 as amended, unless an exception from those rules applies. Failure to comply with such rules may result in the sale of such securities being declared null and void and in the liability of the entity transferring the securities for any damages suffered by the investors.

Japan

The securities have not been and will not be registered under Article 4, paragraph 1 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan (Law No. 25 of 1948), as amended (the “FIEL”) pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements applicable to a private placement of securities to Qualified Institutional Investors (as defined in and in accordance with Article 2, paragraph 3 of the FIEL and the regulations promulgated thereunder). Accordingly, the securities may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to, or for the benefit of, any resident of Japan other than Qualified Institutional Investors. Any Qualified Institutional Investor who acquires securities may not resell them to any person in Japan that is not a Qualified Institutional Investor, and acquisition by any such person of securities is conditional upon the execution of an agreement to that effect.

Portugal

This document is not being distributed in the context of a public offer of financial securities (oferta pública de valores mobiliários) in Portugal, within the meaning of Article 109 of the Portuguese Securities Code (Código dos Valores Mobiliários). The securities have not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the public in Portugal. This document and any other offering material relating to

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the securities have not been, and will not be, submitted to the Portuguese Securities Market Commission (Comissã do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários) for approval in Portugal and, accordingly, may not be distributed or caused to distributed, directly or indirectly, to the public in Portugal, other than under circumstances that are deemed not to qualify as a public offer under the Portuguese Securities Code. Such offers, sales and distributions of securities in Portugal are limited to persons who are “qualified investors” (as defined in the Portuguese Securities Code). Only such investors may receive this document and they may not distribute it or the information contained in it to any other person.

Sweden

This document has not been, and will not be, registered with or approved by Finansinspektionen (the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority). Accordingly, this document may not be made available, nor may the securities be offered for sale in Sweden, other than under circumstances that are deemed not to require a prospectus under the Swedish Financial Instruments Trading Act (1991:980) (Sw. lag (1991:980) om handel med finansiella instrument). Any offering of securities in Sweden is limited to persons who are “qualified investors” (as defined in the Financial Instruments Trading Act). Only such investors may receive this document and they may not distribute it or the information contained in it to any other person.

Switzerland

The securities may not be publicly offered in Switzerland and will not be listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange (“SIX”) or on any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. This document has been prepared without regard to the disclosure standards for issuance prospectuses under art. 652a or art. 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations or the disclosure standards for listing prospectuses under art. 27 ff. of the SIX Listing Rules or the listing rules of any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. Neither this document nor any other offering material relating to the securities may be publicly distributed or otherwise made publicly available in Switzerland.

Neither this document nor any other offering material relating to the securities have been or will be filed with or approved by any Swiss regulatory authority. In particular, this document will not be filed with, and the offer of securities will not be supervised by, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority.

This document is personal to the recipient only and not for general circulation in Switzerland.

United Arab Emirates

Neither this document nor the securities have been approved, disapproved or passed on in any way by the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates or any other governmental authority in the United Arab Emirates, nor has the Company received authorization or licensing from the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates or any other governmental authority in the United Arab Emirates to market or sell the securities within the United Arab Emirates. This document does not constitute and may not be used for the purpose of an offer or invitation. No services relating to the securities, including the receipt of applications and/or the allotment or redemption of such shares, may be rendered within the United Arab Emirates by the Company.

No offer or invitation to subscribe for securities is valid or permitted in the Dubai International Financial Centre.

United Kingdom

Neither the information in this document nor any other document relating to the offer has been delivered for approval to the Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom and no prospectus (within the meaning of section 85 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, as amended (“FSMA”)) has been published or is intended to be published in respect of the securities. This document is issued on a confidential basis to “qualified investors” (within the meaning of section 86(7) of FSMA) in the United Kingdom, and the securities may not be offered or sold in the United Kingdom by means of this document, any accompanying letter or any other document, except in circumstances which do not require the publication of a prospectus pursuant to section 86(1) FSMA.

This document should not be distributed, published or reproduced, in whole or in part, nor may its contents be disclosed by recipients to any other person in the United Kingdom.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Any invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of section 21 of FSMA) received in connection with the issue or sale of the securities has only been communicated or caused to be communicated and will only be communicated or caused to be communicated in the United Kingdom in circumstances in which section 21(1) of FSMA does not apply.

In the United Kingdom, this document is being distributed only to, and is directed at, persons (i) who have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19(5) (investment professionals) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotions) Order 2005 (“FPO”), (ii) who fall within the categories of persons referred to in Article 49(2)(a) to (d) (high net worth companies, unincorporated associations, etc.) of the FPO or (iii) to whom it may otherwise be lawfully communicated (together “relevant persons”). The investments to which this document relates are available only to, and any invitation, offer or agreement to purchase will be engaged in only with, relevant persons. Any person who is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this document or any of its contents.

LEGAL MATTERS

Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck P.C. will render a legal opinion as to the validity of the securities to be registered hereby. Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon for the underwriter by Shearman & Sterling LLP, Menlo Park, California.

EXPERTS

Our financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 included in this prospectus have been audited by Friedman, LLP, independent certified public accountants, to the extent and for the periods set forth in their report appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance on such report given upon the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. We have also filed with the SEC under the Securities Act a registration statement on Form S-1 with respect to the common stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus, which constitutes part of the registration statement, does not contain all the information set forth in the registration statement or the exhibits and schedules which are part of the registration statement, portions of which are omitted as permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC. Statements made in this prospectus regarding the contents of any contract or other document are summaries of the material terms of the contract or document. With respect to each contract or document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, reference is made to the corresponding exhibit. For further information pertaining to us and the common stock offered by this prospectus, reference is made to the registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules thereto, copies of which may be inspected without charge at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 on official business days during the hours of 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Copies of all or any portion of the registration statement may be obtained from the SEC at prescribed rates. Information on the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The web site can be accessed at http://www.sec.gov. The internet address of xG is www.xgtechnology.com. Information contained on our website is not a part of, and is not incorporated into, this prospectus, and the inclusion of our website address in this prospectus is an inactive textual reference only.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Index to Financial Statements

Unaudited Condensed Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014			F-2
Unaudited Condensed Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014			F-4
Unaudited Condensed Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2015			F-5
Unaudited Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014			F-6
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements			F-7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

xG TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
UNAUDITED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

		March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash		$	221			$	758
Cash, restricted			600				—
Inventory, net			3,758				4,070
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $30 and $30 ($335 and $480 from related party)			557				702
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			336				411
Total current assets			5,472				5,941
Property and equipment, net			882				816
Intangible assets, net			16,111				16,382
Total assets		$	22,465			$	23,139
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable		$	1,393			$	868
Accrued expenses			731				511
Accrued interest			87				42
Deferred revenue			50				—
Due to related parties			264				2,110
Deferred revenue – related party			—				480
Obligation under capital lease			135				123
Derivative liabilities			520				270
Total current liabilities			3,180				4,404
Long-term obligation under capital lease			83				—
Convertible note payable			2,000				2,000
Total liabilities			5,263				6,404
Commitments and contingencies
Series A convertible preferred stock – $0.00001 par value per share: 3,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014; 0 and 750,000 issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (liquidation preference of $0 at March 31, 2015 and $750,100 at December 31, 2014)			—				378
Series B convertible preferred stock – $0.00001 par value per share: 3,000,000 and 0 shares authorized at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014; 250,000 and 0 issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (liquidation preference of $252,300 at March 31, 2015)			104				—
Series C convertible preferred stock – $0.00001 par value per share: 3,000,000 and 0 shares authorized at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014; 1,589,720 and 0 issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (liquidation preference of $1,600,391 at March 31, 2015)			895				—
Total convertible preferred stock			999				378

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

xG TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
UNAUDITED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS – (continued)
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

		March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Preferred stock – $0.00001 par value per share: 1,000,000 and 7,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014; none issued or outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014			—				—
Common stock, – $0.00001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 3,641,914 and 2,617,622 shares issued as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively			—*				—*
Additional paid in capital			190,302				186,919
Accumulated deficit			(174,077	)			(170,540	)
Treasury stock, at cost – 229 shares at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively			(22	)			(22	)
Total stockholders’ equity			16,203				16,357
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity		$	22,465			$	23,139

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

xG TECHNOLOGY, INC.

 
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT NET LOSS PER SHARE DATA)

		For the Three Months Ended March 31,
		2015				2014
Revenue		$	584			$	250
Cost of revenue and operating expenses
Cost of components and personnel			330				63
General and administrative expenses			1,586				1,679
Development			1,550				2,453
Stock based compensation			133				214
Amortization and depreciation			960				948
Total cost of revenue and operating expenses			4,559				5,357
Loss from operations			(3,975	)			(5,107	)
Other income (expense)
Changes in fair value of derivative liabilities			485				—
Interest expense, net			(47	)			(46	)
Total other income (expense)			438				(46	)
Loss before income tax provision			(3,537	)			(5,153	)
Income tax provision			—				—
Net loss		$	(3,537	)		$	(5,153	)
Dividends and deemed dividends			1,070				—
Net loss attributable to common shareholders			(4,607	)			(5,153	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share		$	(1.54	)		$	(2.75	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding basic and diluted			2,998				1,876

 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

xG TECHNOLOGY, INC.
 
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

		Common Stock								Additional Paid In Capital				Treasury Stock				Accumulated Deficit				Total
		Shares				Amount
Balance, January 1, 2015			2,617,622			$	— *			$	186,919			$	(22	)		$	(170,540	)		$	16,357
Net loss			—				—				—				—				(3,537	)			(3,537	)
Stock based compensation			—				—				133				—				—				133
Compensation granted in stock			10,343				— *				73				—				—				73
Issuance of stock MBTH conversion of due to related party			399,114				— *				1,756				—				—				1,756
Commitment fee – 15 million purchase agreement			—				— *				(45	)			—				—				(45	)
Issuance of stock – Series A conversions			239,247				— *				528				—				—				528
Issuance of stock – Series B conversions – Related Party			222,791				— *				703				—				—				703
Issuance of stock – Series B conversions – 31 Group			44,910				— *				44				—				—				44
Issuance of stock – Series C conversions			88,251				— *				103				—				—				103
Issuance of stock commitment shares – Series B financing – Related Party			5,310				— *				24				—				—				24
Issuance of stock commitment shares – Series B financing –  31 Group			2,462				— *				10				—				—				10
Issuance of stock commitment shares – Series C financing			11,864				— *				54				—				—				54
Balance, March 31, 2015			3,641,914			$	— *			$	190,302			$	(22	)		$	(174,077	)		$	16,203