JUNIATA VALLEY FINANCIAL CORP - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - JUNIATA VALLEY FINANCIAL CORP	v413174_ex31-2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - JUNIATA VALLEY FINANCIAL CORP	v413174_ex31-1.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - JUNIATA VALLEY FINANCIAL CORP	v413174_ex32-1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - JUNIATA VALLEY FINANCIAL CORP	v413174_ex32-2.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________________________ to _____________________________

Commission File Number

000-13232

Juniata Valley Financial Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania	23-2235254
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

Bridge and Main Streets, Mifflintown, Pennsylvania	17059
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(717) 436-8211

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

¨ Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding as of August 7, 2015
Common Stock ($1.00 par value)		4,190,683 shares

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 (Unaudited)	4

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	5

	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	6

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	7

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	43

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	44

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	45

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	45

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	45

Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	45

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	45

Item 5.	Other Information	45

Item 6.	Exhibits	46

	Signatures	47

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

( Unaudited, in thousands, except share data)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2015			2014
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	7,746		$	6,757
Interest bearing deposits with banks		247			10
Cash and cash equivalents		7,993			6,767

Securities available for sale		138,348			142,903
Restricted investment in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock		3,055			2,726
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary		4,457			4,369
Total loans		304,123			294,901
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(2,315	)		(2,380	)
Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses		301,808			292,521
Premises and equipment, net		6,453			6,533
Other real estate owned		558			232
Bank owned life insurance and annuities		14,997			14,807
Investment in low income housing partnership		3,608			3,847
Core deposit intangible		52			74
Goodwill		2,046			2,046
Mortgage servicing rights		204			193
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		3,529			3,511
Total assets	$	487,108		$	480,529
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	79,043		$	77,697
Interest bearing		299,723			303,187
Total deposits		378,766			380,884

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		3,926			4,594
Short-term borrowings		25,450			15,950
Long-term debt		22,500			22,500
Other interest bearing liabilities		1,430			1,412
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		4,934			5,333
Total liabilities		437,006			430,673
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock, no par value:
Authorized - 500,000 shares, none issued		-			-
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share:
Authorized - 20,000,000 shares
Issued - 4,745,826 shares
Outstanding -
4,190,683 shares at June 30, 2015;
4,187,441 shares at December 31, 2014		4,746			4,746
Surplus		18,430			18,409
Retained earnings		39,726			39,644
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,117	)		(2,197	)
Cost of common stock in Treasury:
555,143 shares at June 30, 2015;
558,385 shares at December 31, 2014		(10,683	)		(10,746	)
Total stockholders' equity		50,102			49,856
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	487,108		$	480,529

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited, in thousands, except share and per share data)

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2015			2014		2015			2014
Interest income:
Loans, including fees	$	3,548		$	3,662	$	7,095		$	7,212
Taxable securities		557			535		1,118			890
Tax-exempt securities		114			126		232			256
Other interest income		1			2		1			3
Total interest income		4,220			4,325		8,446			8,361
Interest expense:
Deposits		413			608		894			1,229
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		1			1		2			2
Short-term borrowings		10			1		21			2
Long-term debt		68			69		136			69
Other interest bearing liabilities		4			4		8			8
Total interest expense		496			683		1,061			1,310
Net interest income		3,724			3,642		7,385			7,051
Provision for loan losses		112			117		162			137
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		3,612			3,525		7,223			6,914
Non-interest income:
Customer service fees		389			290		753			558
Debit card fee income		219			215		424			418
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance and annuities		92			94		182			191
Trust fees		84			131		165			207
Commissions from sales of non-deposit products		118			88		208			200
Income from unconsolidated subsidiary		62			57		111			94
Fees derived from loan activity		52			32		86			70
Mortgage banking income		60			56		114			85
Net gain (loss) on sales and calls of securities		1			2		(16	)		7
Gain from life insurance proceeds		-			165		-			165
Other non-interest income		53			40		103			95
Total non-interest income		1,130			1,170		2,130			2,090
Non-interest expense:
Employee compensation expense		1,490			1,497		2,964			2,849
Employee benefits		473			363		1,023			766
Occupancy		253			237		535			519
Equipment		133			116		261			230
Data processing expense		390			370		777			750
Director compensation		54			51		103			108
Professional fees		100			99		214			198
Taxes, other than income		92			77		181			184
FDIC Insurance premiums		75			74		162			155
(Gain) loss on sales of other real estate owned		(5	)		29		(5	)		11
Amortization of intangibles		11			11		22			22
Amortization of investment in low-income housing partnership		119			119		239			239
Merger and acquisition expense		48			-		58			-
Other non-interest expense		388			358		691			706
Total non-interest expense		3,621			3,401		7,225			6,737
Income before income taxes		1,121			1,294		2,128			2,267
Provision for income taxes		120			131		203			201
Net income	$	1,001		$	1,163	$	1,925		$	2,066
Earnings per share
Basic	$	0.24		$	0.28	$	0.46		$	0.49
Diluted	$	0.24		$	0.28	$	0.46		$	0.49
Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.22		$	0.22	$	0.44		$	0.44
Weighted average basic shares outstanding		4,189,090			4,195,491		4,188,265			4,195,876
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding		4,190,036			4,195,749		4,189,304			4,196,136

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited, in thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2015									Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
	Before						Net of			Before						Net of
	Tax			Tax			Tax			Tax			Tax			Tax
	Amount			Effect			Amount			Amount			Effect			Amount
Net income	$	1,121		$	(120	)	$	1,001		$	1,294		$	(131	)	$	1,163
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized (losses) gains on available for sale securities:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period		(880	)		299			(581	)		832			(283	)		549
Unrealized holding gains from unconsolidated subsidiary		3			-			3			4			-			4
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (1) (3)		(1	)		1			-			(2	)		-			(2	)
Amortization of pension net actuarial cost (2) (3)		60			(21	)		39			10			(3	)		7
Other comprehensive (loss) income		(818	)		279			(539	)		844			(286	)		558
Total comprehensive income	$	303		$	159		$	462		$	2,138		$	(417	)	$	1,721

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2015									Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
	Before						Net of			Before						Net of
	Tax			Tax			Tax			Tax			Tax			Tax
	Amount			Effect			Amount			Amount			Effect			Amount
Net income	$	2,128		$	(203	)	$	1,925		$	2,267		$	(201	)	$	2,066
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized (losses) gains on available for sale securities:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period		(28	)		9			(19	)		1,387			(471	)		916
Unrealized holding gains from unconsolidated subsidiary		9			-			9			10			-			10
Less reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income (1) (3)		16			(5	)		11			(7	)		2			(5	)
Amortization of pension net actuarial cost (2) (3)		121			(42	)		79			20			(7	)		13
Other comprehensive income		118			(38	)		80			1,410			(476	)		934
Total comprehensive income	$	2,246		$	(241	)	$	2,005		$	3,677		$	(677	)	$	3,000

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(1)

Amounts are included in gain on sales and calls of securities on the Consolidated Statements of Income as a separate element within total non-interest income.

(2)

Amounts are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost and are included in employee benefits expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income as a separate element within total non-interest expense.

(3)

Income tax amounts are included in the provision for income taxes on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

(Unaudited, in thousands, except share data)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

	Number										Accumulated
	of										Other						Total
	Shares		Common					Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury			Stockholders'
	Outstanding		Stock		Surplus			Earnings			Loss			Stock			Equity
Balance at January 1, 2015		4,187,441	$	4,746	$	18,409		$	39,644		$	(2,197	)	$	(10,746	)	$	49,856
Net income									1,925									1,925
Other comprehensive income												80						80
Cash dividends at $0.44 per share									(1,843	)								(1,843	)
Stock-based compensation						27												27
Treasury stock issued for stock option and stock purchase plans		3,242				(6	)								63			57
Balance at June 30, 2015		4,190,683	$	4,746	$	18,430		$	39,726		$	(2,117	)	$	(10,683	)	$	50,102

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

	Number											Accumulated
	of											Other						Total
	Shares			Common					Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury			Stockholders'
	Outstanding			Stock		Surplus			Earnings			Loss			Stock			Equity
Balance at January 1, 2014		4,196,266		$	4,746	$	18,370		$	39,118		$	(1,659	)	$	(10,591	)	$	49,984
Net income										2,066									2,066
Other comprehensive income													934						934
Cash dividends at $0.44 per share										(1,847	)								(1,847	)
Stock-based compensation							23												23
Purchase of treasury stock		(9,656	)													(173	)		(173	)
Treasury stock issued for stock option and stock purchase plans		3,497					(8	)								67			59
Balance at June 30, 2014		4,190,107		$	4,746	$	18,385		$	39,337		$	(725	)	$	(10,697	)	$	51,046

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited, in thousands)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
Operating activities:
Net income	$	1,925		$	2,066
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		162			137
Depreciation		267			240
Net amortization of securities premiums		417			266
Net amortization of loan origination costs (fees)		27			(16	)
Deferred net loan origination costs		(85	)		(52	)
Amortization of core deposit intangible		22			22
Amortization of investment in low income housing partnership		239			239
Net realized loss (gain) on calls and sales of securities		16			(7	)
Net (gain) loss on sales of other real estate owned		(5	)		11
Earnings on bank owned life insurance and annuities		(182	)		(191	)
Deferred income tax expense		72			48
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary, net of dividends of $30 and $27		(81	)		(67	)
Stock-based compensation expense		27			23
Mortgage loans originated for sale		(2,080	)		(1,325	)
Proceeds from loans sold to others		2,182			1,402
Mortgage banking income		(114	)		(85	)
Gain from life insurance proceeds		-			(165	)
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets		(126	)		(678	)
Decrease in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		(238	)		(148	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		2,445			1,720
Investing activities:
Purchases of:
Securities available for sale		(32,392	)		(52,832	)
FHLB stock		(329	)		(654	)
Premises and equipment		(187	)		(72	)
Bank owned life insurance and annuities		(29	)		(35	)
Proceeds from:
Sales of securities available for sale		18,711			7,120
Maturities of and principal repayments on securities available for sale		17,791			18,681
Bank owned life insurance and annuities		-			4
Life insurance claim		-			615
Sale of other real estate owned		227			167
Investment in low income housing partnership		-			(335	)
Net increase in loans		(9,939	)		(822	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(6,147	)		(28,163	)
Financing activities:
Net (decrease) increase in deposits		(2,118	)		13,684
Net change in short-term borrowings and securities sold under agreements to repurchase		8,832			(7,736	)
Issuance of long-term debt		-			22,500
Cash dividends		(1,843	)		(1,847	)
Purchase of treasury stock		-			(173	)
Treasury stock issued for employee stock plans		57			59
Net cash provided by financing activities		4,928			26,487
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		1,226			44
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		6,767			8,613
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	7,993		$	8,657
Supplemental information:
Interest paid	$	1,132		$	1,277
Income taxes paid		100			50
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned	$	548		$	278

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

JUNIATA VALLEY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Juniata Valley Financial Corp. (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, The Juniata Valley Bank (the “Bank”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2015. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Juniata Valley Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the consolidated statement of financial condition date of June 30, 2015 for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these consolidated financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

2. Recent Accounting Standards Updates (ASU)

Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)

Issued: May 2014

Summary: The amendments in this Update establish a comprehensive revenue recognition standard for virtually all industries under U.S. GAAP, including those that previously followed industry-specific guidance such as the real estate, construction and software industries. The revenue standard’s core principle is built on the contract between a vendor and a customer for the provision of goods and services. It attempts to depict the exchange of rights and obligations between the parties in the pattern of revenue recognition based on the consideration to which the vendor is entitled. To accomplish this objective, the standard requires five basic steps: (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

Effective Date and Transition: Public entities will apply the new standard for annual reports beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. Three basic transition methods are available – full retrospective, retrospective with certain practical expedients, and a cumulative effect approach. Under the third alternative, an entity would apply the new revenue standard only to contracts that are incomplete under legacy U.S. GAAP at the date of initial application (e.g. January 1, 2017) and recognize the cumulative effect of the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. That is, prior years would not be restated and additional disclosures would be required to enable users of the financial statements to understand the impact of adopting the new standard in the current year compared to prior years that are presented under legacy U.S. GAAP. Early adoption is prohibited under U.S. GAAP. In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board approved a one-year delay of the effective date of the revenue recognition standard. The deferral would require public entities to apply the new revenue standard for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods therein. Public entities would be permitted to elect to early adopt for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is evaluating the effects this Update will have on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Accounting Standards Update 2014-17, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)

Issued: November 2014

Summary: The ASU amends Topic 805 so that a reporting entity that is a business or nonprofit activity (an “acquiree”) has the option to apply pushdown accounting to its separate financial statements when an acquirer obtains control of the acquiree. The option is available for each individual change-in-control event. Control has the same meaning as a “controlling financial interest” under Topic 810, such that pushdown accounting may be applied if an acquirer obtains control through a simple majority of the outstanding voting shares of the acquiree (e.g., 51%). Similarly, a Variable Interest Entity is considered an “acquiree” of its primary beneficiary and may also elect pushdown accounting.

If the acquiree elects to apply pushdown accounting, it must do so as of the acquisition date of the change-in-control event. Further, any subsidiary of the acquiree may elect to apply pushdown accounting to its separate financial statements, regardless of whether the acquiree elects to apply pushdown accounting. Upon election, the acquiree would adjust its standalone financial statements to reflect the acquirer’s new basis in the acquired entity’s assets and liabilities, and would provide relevant disclosures under Topic 805 to enable users to evaluate the effect of pushdown accounting.

Effective Date and Transition: The ASU became effective upon issuance on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event.

3. Accumulated other Comprehensive loss

Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax consisted of the following (in thousands):

	6/30/2015			12/31/2014
Unrealized gains on available for sale securities		297		$	296
Unrecognized expense for defined benefit pension		(2,414	)		(2,493	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,117	)	$	(2,197	)

4. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options and are determined using the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

(Amounts, except earnings per share, in thousands)

	Three Months		Three Months
	Ended		Ended
	June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014

Net income	$	1,001	$	1,163
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		4,189		4,195
Basic earnings per share	$	0.24	$	0.28

Weighted-average common shares outstanding		4,189		4,195
Common stock equivalents due to effect of stock options		1		1
Total weighted-average common shares and equivalents		4,190		4,196
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.24	$	0.28

	Six Months		Six Months
	Ended		Ended
	June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014

Net income	$	1,925	$	2,066
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		4,188		4,196
Basic earnings per share	$	0.46	$	0.49

Weighted-average common shares outstanding		4,188		4,196
Common stock equivalents due to effect of stock options		1		-
Total weighted-average common shares and equivalents		4,189		4,196
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.46	$	0.49

5. Securities

The Company’s investment portfolio includes primarily bonds issued by U.S. Government sponsored agencies (approximately 27%), mortgage-backed securities issued by Government-sponsored agencies and backed by residential mortgages (approximately 48%) and municipal bonds (approximately 24%) as of June 30, 2015. Most of the municipal bonds are general obligation bonds with maturities or pre-refunding dates within 5 years. The remaining 1% of the portfolio includes a group of equity investments in other financial institutions.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, by contractual maturity, are shown below (in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the securities may be called or prepaid with or without prepayment penalties.

	June 30, 2015
Securities Available for Sale					Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Fair		Unrealized		Unrealized
Type and maturity	Cost		Value		Gains		Losses
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations
Within one year	$	4,501	$	4,533	$	32	$	-
After one year but within five years		25,483		25,352		30		(161	)
After five years but within ten years		6,992		6,943		5		(54	)
		36,976		36,828		67		(215	)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
Within one year		9,664		9,683		19		-
After one year but within five years		16,041		16,098		81		(24	)
After five years but within ten years		6,710		6,779		76		(7	)
After ten years		335		334		-		(1	)
		32,750		32,894		176		(32	)

Mortgage-backed securities		67,144		67,054		311		(401	)
Equity securities		1,055		1,572		538		(21	)
Total	$	137,925	$	138,348	$	1,092	$	(669	)

	December 31, 2014
Securities Available for Sale					Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Fair		Unrealized		Unrealized
Type and maturity	Cost		Value		Gains		Losses
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations
Within one year	$	4,510	$	4,566	$	56	$	-
After one year but within five years		39,110		38,723		31		(418	)
After five years but within ten years		6,996		6,812		1		(185	)
		50,616		50,101		88		(603	)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
Within one year		9,903		9,934		31		-
After one year but within five years		16,822		16,853		78		(47	)
After five years but within ten years		8,609		8,748		143		(4	)
After ten years		340		338		-		(2	)
		35,674		35,873		252		(53	)

Mortgage-backed securities		55,123		55,429		367		(61	)
Equity securities		1,055		1,500		475		(30	)
Total	$	142,468	$	142,903	$	1,182	$	(747	)

Certain obligations of the U.S. Government and state and political subdivisions are pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes as required or permitted by law. The carrying value of the pledged assets was $29,845,000 and $30,770,000 at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

In addition to cash received from the scheduled maturities of securities, some investment securities available for sale are sold or called at current market values during the course of normal operations.

The following chart summarizes proceeds received from sales or calls of investment securities transactions and the resulting realized gains and losses (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2015			2014		2015			2014
Gross proceeds from sales of securities	$	5,815		$	4,970	$	18,711		$	7,120
Securities available for sale:
Gross realized gains from sold and called securities	$	13		$	2	$	54		$	7
Gross realized losses from sold and called securities		(12	)		-		(70	)		-

Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities, clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining whether a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired. For debt securities, management must assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are taken before an assessment is made as to whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. For equity securities, consideration is given to management’s intention and ability to hold the securities until recovery of unrealized losses in assessing potential other-than-temporary impairment. More specifically, factors considered to determine other-than-temporary impairment status for individual equity holdings include the length of time the stock has remained in an unrealized loss position, the percentage of unrealized loss compared to the carrying cost of the stock, dividend reduction or suspension, market analyst reviews and expectations, and other pertinent factors that would affect expectations for recovery or further decline.

In instances when a determination is made that an other-than-temporary impairment exists and the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security prior to its anticipated recovery, the other-than-temporary impairment is separated into the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income.

The following table shows gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

	Unrealized Losses at June 30, 2015
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	9,948	$	(46	)	$	13,824	$	(169	)	$	23,772	$	(215	)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		7,364		(27	)		440		(5	)		7,804		(32	)
Mortgage-backed securities		24,609		(401	)		-		-			24,609		(401	)
Debt securities		41,921		(474	)		14,264		(174	)		56,185		(648	)

Equity securities		5		(2	)		64		(19	)		69		(21	)

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	41,926	$	(476	)	$	14,328	$	(193	)	$	56,254	$	(669	)

	Unrealized Losses at December 31, 2014
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	6,998	$	(26	)	$	32,515	$	(577	)	$	39,513	$	(603	)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		5,592		(33	)		2,426		(20	)		8,018		(53	)
Mortgage-backed securities		13,550		(60	)		95		(1	)		13,645		(61	)
Debt securities		26,140		(119	)		35,036		(598	)		61,176		(717	)

Equity securities		31		(2	)		179		(28	)		210		(30	)

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	26,171	$	(121	)	$	35,215	$	(626	)	$	61,386	$	(747	)

At June 30, 2015, 15 U.S. Government agency and corporations securities had unrealized losses that, in the aggregate, totaled 0.9% of amortized cost. Eight of these securities have been in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more.

At June 30, 2015, 26 obligations of state and political subdivisions had unrealized losses that, in the aggregate, totaled 0.4% of amortized cost. One of these securities have been in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more.

At June 30, 2015, 9 mortgage-backed securities had an unrealized loss that totaled 1.6% of amortized cost. None of these securities has been in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more.

The mortgage-backed securities in the Company’s portfolio are government sponsored enterprise (GSE) pass-through instruments issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), which guarantees the timely payment of principal on these investments.

The unrealized losses noted above are considered to be temporary impairments. The decline in the values of the debt securities is due only to interest rate fluctuations, rather than erosion of issuer credit quality. As a result, the payment of contractual cash flows, including principal repayment, is not at risk. As the Company does not intend to sell the securities, does not believe the Company will be required to sell the securities before recovery and expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis, none of the debt securities are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

Equity securities owned by the Company consist of common stock of various financial services providers and are evaluated quarterly for evidence of other-than-temporary impairment. There were three equity securities that were in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more as of June 30, 2015. Individually and collectively, these three equity securities have insignificant unrealized losses. All of these securities have increased in fair value in the preceding twelve months, and therefore are deemed to be temporarily impaired. Management has identified no other-than-temporary impairment as of, or for the periods ended June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014 in the equity portfolio. Management continues to track the performance of each stock owned to determine if it is prudent to recognize any other-than-temporary impairment charges. The Company has the ability and intent to hold its equity securities until recovery of unrealized losses.

6. Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses

Loans that the Company has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at the outstanding unpaid principal balances, net of any deferred fees or costs and the allowance for loan losses. Interest income on all loans, other than nonaccrual loans, is accrued over the term of the loans based on the amount of principal outstanding. Unearned income is amortized to income over the life of the loans, using the interest method.

The loan portfolio is segmented into commercial and consumer loans. Commercial loans are comprised of the following classes of loans: (1) commercial, financial and agricultural, (2) commercial real estate, (3) real estate construction, a portion of (4) mortgage loans and (5) obligations of states and political subdivisions. Consumer loans are comprised of a portion of (4) mortgage loans and (6) personal loans.

Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are designated as non-accrual loans. Accrual of interest on loans is generally discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due or reasonable doubt exists as to the full, timely collection of principal or interest. However, it is the Company’s policy to continue to accrue interest on loans over 90 days past due as long as (1) they are guaranteed or well secured and (2) there is an effective means of timely collection in process. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, all unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed against current period income, and unpaid interest accrued in prior years is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Interest received on nonaccrual loans generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal. Generally, accruals are resumed on loans only when the obligation is brought fully current with respect to interest and principal, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt.

The Company originates loans in the portfolio with the intent to hold them until maturity. At the time the Company no longer intends to hold loans to maturity based on asset/liability management practices, the Company transfers loans from its portfolio to held for sale at fair value. Any write-down recorded upon transfer is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Any write-downs recorded after the initial transfers are recorded as a charge to other non-interest expense. Gains or losses recognized upon sale are included in gains on sales of loans which is a component of non-interest income.

The Company also originates residential mortgage loans with the intent to sell. These individual loans are normally funded by the buyer immediately. The Company maintains servicing rights on these loans. Mortgage servicing rights are recognized as an asset upon the sale of a mortgage loan. A portion of the cost of the loan is allocated to the servicing right based upon relative fair value. Servicing rights are intangible assets and are carried at estimated fair value. Adjustments to fair value are recorded as non-interest income and included in gain on sales of loans in the consolidated statements of income.

The allowance for credit losses consists of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments. The allowance for loan losses (“allowance”) represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the consolidated statement of financial condition date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The reserve for unfunded lending commitments represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in its unfunded lending commitments and is recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial condition, when necessary. The amount of the reserve for unfunded lending commitments is not material to the consolidated financial statements. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

For financial reporting purposes, the provision for loan losses charged to current operating income is based on management's estimates, and actual losses may vary from estimates. These estimates are reviewed and adjusted at least quarterly and are reported in earnings in the periods in which they become known.

Loans included in any class are considered for charge-off when:

principal or interest has been in default for 120 days or more and for which no payment has been received during the previous four months;

all collateral securing the loan has been liquidated and a deficiency balance remains;

a bankruptcy notice is received for an unsecured loan;

a confirming loss event has occurred; or

the loan is deemed to be uncollectible for any other reason.

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to offset probable losses on the Company’s existing loans. The analysis of the allowance for loan losses relies heavily on changes in observable trends that may indicate potential credit weaknesses. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance for loan losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management. Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the level of the allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2015 was adequate.

There are two components of the allowance: a specific component for loans that are deemed to be impaired; and a general component for contingencies.

A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loans and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral. For commercial loans secured with real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the current appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised values may be discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include the estimated costs to sell the property. For commercial loans secured by non-real estate collateral, estimated fair values are determined based on the borrower’s financial statements, inventory reports, aging accounts receivable, equipment appraisals or invoices. Indications of value from these sources are generally discounted based on the age of the financial information or the quality of the assets. For such loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The Company generally does not separately identify individual consumer segment loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are subject to a restructuring agreement.

Loans whose terms are modified are classified as troubled debt restructurings if the Company grants borrowers concessions and it is deemed that those borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. Concessions granted under a troubled debt restructuring generally involve a below-market interest rate based on the loan’s risk characteristics or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date. Nonaccrual troubled debt restructurings are restored to accrual status if principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are current for a sustained period of time after modification. Loans classified as troubled debt restructurings are designated as impaired.

The component of the allowance for contingencies relates to other loans that have been segmented into risk rated categories. The borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated quarterly or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans classified as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified as substandard have one or more well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. Substandard loans include loans that are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loans not classified are rated pass. Specific reserves may be established for larger, individual classified loans as a result of this evaluation, as discussed above. Remaining loans are categorized into large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans and are collectively evaluated for impairment. This computation is generally based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. The historical loss experience is averaged over a ten-year period for each of the portfolio segments. The ten-year timeframe was selected in order to capture activity over a wide range of economic conditions and has been consistently used by the Company for the past seven years. Qualitative risk factors are reviewed for relevancy each quarter and include:

National, regional and local economic and business conditions, as well as the condition of various market segments, including the underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans;

Nature and volume of the portfolio and terms of loans;

Experience, ability and depth of lending and credit management and staff;

Volume and severity of past due, classified and nonaccrual loans, as well as other loan modifications;

Existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations; and

Effect of external factors, including competition.

Each factor is assigned a value to reflect improving, stable or declining conditions based on management’s best judgment using relevant information available at the time of the evaluation. Adjustments to the factors are supported through documentation of changes in conditions in a narrative accompanying the allowance for loan loss calculation.

Commercial, Financial and Agricultural Lending

The Company originates commercial, financial and agricultural loans primarily to businesses located in its primary market area and surrounding areas. These loans are used for various business purposes, which include short-term loans and lines of credit to finance machinery and equipment purchases, inventory and accounts receivable. Generally, the maximum term for loans extended on machinery and equipment is shorter and does not exceed the projected useful life of such machinery and equipment. Most business lines of credit are written with a five year maturity, subject to an annual credit review.

Commercial loans are generally secured with short-term assets; however, in many cases, additional collateral, such as real estate, is provided as additional security for the loan. Loan-to-value maximum values have been established by the Company and are specific to the type of collateral. Collateral values may be determined using invoices, inventory reports, accounts receivable aging reports, collateral appraisals, etc.

In underwriting commercial loans, an analysis of the borrower’s character, capacity to repay the loan, the adequacy of the borrower’s capital and collateral, as well as an evaluation of conditions affecting the borrower, is performed. Analysis of the borrower’s past, present and future cash flows is also an important aspect of the Company’s analysis.

Concentration analysis assists in identifying industry specific risk inherent in commercial, financial and agricultural lending. Mitigants include the identification of secondary and tertiary sources of repayment and appropriate increases in oversight.

Commercial, financial and agricultural loans generally present a higher level of risk than certain other types of loans, particularly during slow economic conditions.

Commercial Real Estate Lending

The Company engages in commercial real estate lending in its primary market area and surrounding areas. The Company’s commercial real estate portfolio is secured primarily by residential housing, commercial buildings, raw land and hotels. Generally, commercial real estate loans have terms that do not exceed 20 years, have loan-to-value ratios of up to 80% of the appraised value of the property and are typically secured by personal guarantees of the borrowers.

As economic conditions deteriorate, the Company reduces its exposure in real estate loans with higher risk characteristics. In underwriting these loans, the Company performs a thorough analysis of the financial condition of the borrower, the borrower’s credit history, and the reliability and predictability of the cash flow generated by the property securing the loan. Appraisals on properties securing commercial real estate loans originated by the Company are performed by independent appraisers.

Commercial real estate loans generally present a higher level of risk than certain other types of loans, particularly during slow economic conditions.

Real Estate Construction Lending

The Company engages in real estate construction lending in its primary market area and surrounding areas. The Company’s real estate construction lending consists of commercial and residential site development loans, as well as commercial building construction and residential housing construction loans.

The Company’s commercial real estate construction loans are generally secured with the subject property, and advances are made in conformity with a pre-determined draw schedule supported by independent inspections. Terms of construction loans depend on the specifics of the project, such as estimated absorption rates, estimated time to complete, etc.

In underwriting commercial real estate construction loans, the Company performs a thorough analysis of the financial condition of the borrower, the borrower’s credit history, the reliability and predictability of the cash flow generated by the project using feasibility studies, market data, etc. Appraisals on properties securing commercial real estate loans originated by the Company are performed by independent appraisers.

Real estate construction loans generally present a higher level of risk than certain other types of loans, particularly during slow economic conditions. The difficulty of estimating total construction costs adds to the risk as well.

Mortgage Lending

The Company’s real estate mortgage portfolio is comprised of consumer residential mortgages and business loans secured by one-to-four family properties. One-to-four family residential mortgage loan originations, including home equity installment and home equity lines of credit loans, are generated by the Company’s marketing efforts, its present customers, walk-in customers and referrals. These loans originate primarily within the Company’s market area or with customers primarily from the market area.

The Company offers fixed-rate and adjustable rate mortgage loans with terms up to a maximum of 25-years for both permanent structures and those under construction. The Company’s one-to-four family residential mortgage originations are secured primarily by properties located in its primary market area and surrounding areas. The majority of the Company’s residential mortgage loans originate with a loan-to-value of 80% or less. Home equity installment loans are secured by the borrower’s primary residence with a maximum loan-to-value of 80% and a maximum term of 15 years. Home equity lines of credit are secured by the borrower’s primary residence with a maximum loan-to-value of 90% and a maximum term of 20 years.

In underwriting one-to-four family residential real estate loans, the Company evaluates the borrower’s ability to make monthly payments, the borrower’s repayment history and the value of the property securing the loan. The ability to repay is determined by the borrower’s employment history, current financial conditions, and credit background. The analysis is based primarily on the customer’s ability to repay and secondarily on the collateral or security. Most properties securing real estate loans made by the Company are appraised by independent fee appraisers. The Company generally requires mortgage loan borrowers to obtain an attorney’s title opinion or title insurance, and fire and property insurance (including flood insurance, if necessary) in an amount not less than the amount of the loan. The Company does not engage in sub-prime residential mortgage originations.

Residential mortgage loans and home equity loans generally present a lower level of risk than certain other types of consumer loans because they are secured by the borrower’s primary residence. Risk is increased when the Company is in a subordinate position for the loan collateral.

Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions

The Company lends to local municipalities and other tax-exempt organizations. These loans are primarily tax-anticipation notes and, as such, carry little risk. Historically, the Company has never had a loss on any loan of this type.

Personal Lending

The Company offers a variety of secured and unsecured personal loans, including vehicle loans, mobile home loans and loans secured by savings deposits as well as other types of personal loans.

Personal loan terms vary according to the type and value of collateral and creditworthiness of the borrower. In underwriting personal loans, a thorough analysis of the borrower’s willingness and financial ability to repay the loan as agreed is performed. The ability to repay is determined by the borrower’s employment history, current financial conditions and credit background.

Personal loans may entail greater credit risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of personal loans which are unsecured or are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles or recreational equipment. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted personal loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. In addition, personal loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.

Loan Portfolio Classification

The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aggregate pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention, substandard and doubtful within the Company’s internal risk rating system as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

As of June 30, 2015	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	22,968	$	2,570	$	1,494	$	-	$	27,032
Real estate - commercial		81,115		17,321		2,857		1,231		102,524
Real estate - construction		13,920		3,302		3,531		312		21,065
Real estate - mortgage		124,773		5,204		4,691		1,134		135,802
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		12,958		469		-		-		13,427
Personal		4,221		52		-		-		4,273
Total	$	259,955	$	28,918	$	12,573	$	2,677	$	304,123

As of December 31, 2014	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	17,904	$	5,697	$	137	$	-	$	23,738
Real estate - commercial		70,369		15,297		3,037		1,297		90,000
Real estate - construction		12,934		3,486		3,957		336		20,713
Real estate - mortgage		128,898		5,611		4,280		1,887		140,676
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		15,708		22		-		-		15,730
Personal		3,987		57		-		-		4,044
Total	$	249,800	$	30,170	$	11,411	$	3,520	$	294,901

The Company has certain loans in its portfolio that are considered to be impaired. It is the policy of the Company to recognize income on impaired loans that have been transferred to nonaccrual status on a cash basis, only to the extent that it exceeds principal balance recovery. Until an impaired loan is placed on nonaccrual status, income is recognized on the accrual basis. Collateral analysis is performed on each impaired loan at least quarterly, and results are used to determine if a specific reserve is necessary to adjust the carrying value of each individual loan down to the estimated fair value. Generally, specific reserves are carried against impaired loans based upon estimated collateral value until a confirming loss event occurs or until termination of the credit is scheduled through liquidation of the collateral or foreclosure. Charge off will occur when a confirmed loss is identified. Professional appraisals of collateral, discounted for expected selling costs, appraisal age, economic conditions and other known factors are used to determine the charge-off amount. The following tables summarize information regarding impaired loans by portfolio class as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

	As of June 30, 2015						As of December 31, 2014
Impaired loans	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and
agricultural	$	-		-	$	-	$	1	$	1	$	-
Real estate - commercial		2,334		2,494		-		2,264		2,357		-
Real estate - construction		312		664		-		336		664		-
Real estate - mortgage		2,994		4,334		-		3,056		4,324		-

With an allowance recorded:
Real estate - mortgage	$	41	$	50	$	2	$	896	$	937	$	150

Total:
Commercial, financial and
agricultural	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	1	$	1	$	-
Real estate - commercial		2,334		2,494		-		2,264		2,357		-
Real estate - construction		312		664		-		336		664		-
Real estate - mortgage		3,035		4,384		2		3,952		5,261		150
	$	5,681	$	7,542	$	2	$	6,553	$	8,283	$	150

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2015						Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
Impaired loans	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Cash Basis Interest Income		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Cash Basis Interest Income
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and
agricultural	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	7	$	11	$	1
Real estate - commercial		2,277		12		4		917		1		21
Real estate - construction		157		-		-		1		-		-
Real estate - mortgage		2,888		9		6		3,348		9		41

With an allowance recorded:
Real estate - commercial	$	101	$	-	$	-	$	1,767	$	-	$	2
Real estate - construction		168		-		-		526		-		-
Real estate - mortgage		350		-		-		355		-		-

Total:
Commercial, financial and
agricultural	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	7	$	11	$	1
Real estate - commercial		2,378		12		4		2,684		1		23
Real estate - construction		325		-		-		527		-		-
Real estate - mortgage		3,238		9		6		3,703		9		41
	$	5,941	$	21	$	10	$	6,921	$	21	$	65

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2015						Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Impaired loans	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Cash Basis Interest Income		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Cash Basis Interest Income
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial and
agricultural	$	1	$	-		-	$	50	$	11	$	1
Real estate - commercial		2,299		23		10		1,508		12		24
Real estate - construction		324		-		-		253		-		-
Real estate - mortgage		3,025		19		13		3,240		24		56

With an allowance recorded:
Real estate - commercial	$	67		-			$	887	$	-	$	11
Real estate - construction		112		-				1,001		-		-
Real estate - mortgage		469		-				358		-		-

Total:
Commercial, financial and
agricultural	$	1	$	-	$	-	$	50	$	11	$	1
Real estate - commercial		2,366		23		10		2,395		12		35
Real estate - construction		436		-		-		1,254		-		-
Real estate - mortgage		3,494		19		13		3,598		24		56
	$	6,297	$	42	$	23	$	7,297	$	47	$	92

The following table presents nonaccrual loans by classes of the loan portfolio as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

Nonaccrual loans:	June 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
Real estate - commercial	$	1,661	$	1,717
Real estate - construction		312		336
Real estate - mortgage		2,442		3,193
Total	$	4,415	$	5,246

The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

As of June 30, 2015	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Loans Past Due greater than 90 Days and Accruing
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	15	$	-	$	-	$	15	$	27,017	$	27,032	$	-
Real estate - commercial		131		35		1,244		1,410		101,114		102,524		-
Real estate - construction		-		-		312		312		20,753		21,065		-
Real estate - mortgage		458		1,968		1,918		4,344		131,458		135,802		30
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		-		-		-		-		13,427		13,427		-
Personal		14		-		-		14		4,259		4,273		-
Total	$	618	$	2,003	$	3,474	$	6,095	$	298,028	$	304,123	$	30

As of December 31, 2014	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Loans Past Due greater than 90 Days and Accruing
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	2	$	12	$	-	$	14	$	23,724	$	23,738	$	-
Real estate - commercial		388		61		1,717		2,166		87,834		90,000		-
Real estate - construction		-		104		336		440		20,273		20,713		-
Real estate - mortgage		498		1,326		2,968		4,792		135,884		140,676		400
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		-		-		-		-		15,730		15,730		-
Personal		17		-		-		17		4,027		4,044		-
Total	$	905	$	1,503	$	5,021	$	7,429	$	287,472	$	294,901	$	400

The following table summarizes information regarding troubled debt restructurings by loan portfolio class at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, in thousands of dollars.

	Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Recorded Investment
As of June 30, 2015
Accruing troubled debt restructurings:
Real estate - mortgage		6		254		282		244
Real estate - commercial		1		148		148		144
		7	$	402	$	430	$	388

As of December 31, 2014
Accruing troubled debt restructurings:
Real estate - mortgage		6	$	254	$	282	$	256
Real estate - commercial		1		148		148		145

Non-accruing troubled debt restructurings:
Real estate - mortgage		1		364		371		366
		8	$	766	$	801	$	767

The Company’s troubled debt restructurings are also impaired loans, which may result in a specific allocation and subsequent charge-off if appropriate. As of June 30, 2015 there were no specific reserves carried for troubled debt restructurings, but one troubled debt restructured loan was foreclosed upon during the second quarter of 2015, resulting in a charge-off of $90,000 and an addition to OREO of $265,000. There were no defaults of troubled debt restructurings that took place during the three or six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 within 12 months of restructure. On December 31, 2014, there were no specific reserves carried for troubled debt restructured loans and no charge-offs relating to the troubled debt restructurings. The amended terms of the restructured loans vary, whereby interest rates have been reduced, principal payments have been reduced or deferred for a period of time and/or maturity dates have been extended.

There were no loans whose terms have been modified resulting in troubled debt restructurings during the three months or six months ended June 30, 2015. The following table summarizes loans whose terms had been modified resulting in troubled debt restructurings during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, in thousands of dollars:

	Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Recorded Investment
Three months ended June 30, 2014
Accruing troubled debt restructurings:
Real estate - mortgage		1	$	49	$	49	$	47
		1	$	49	$	49	$	47
Six months ended June 30, 2014
Accruing troubled debt restructurings:
Real estate - mortgage		1	$	49	$	49	$	47
		1	$	49	$	49	$	47

Consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 totaled $296,000 and $384,000, respectively.

The following tables summarize the activity in the allowance for loan losses and related investments in loans receivable (in thousands):

As of, and for the period ended, June 30, 2015

Allowance for loan losses:	Commercial, financial and agricultural		Real estate - commercial			Real estate - construction			Real estate - mortgage			Obligations of states and political subdivisions		Personal			Total
Beginning balance, April 1, 2015	$	216	$	706		$	174		$	1,268		$	-	$	35		$	2,399
Charge-offs		-		(66	)		(24	)		(106	)		-		(4	)		(200	)
Recoveries		-		-			-			1			-		3			4
Provisions		16		112			8			(29	)		-		5			112
Ending balance, June 30, 2015	$	232	$	752		$	158		$	1,134		$	-	$	39		$	2,315

Beginning balance, January 1, 2015	$	222	$	665		$	155		$	1,300		$	-	$	38		$	2,380
Charge-offs		-		(66	)		(24	)		(138	)		-		(5	)		(233	)
Recoveries		-		-			-			1			-		5			6
Provisions		10		153			27			(29	)		-		1			162
Ending balance, June 30, 2015	$	232	$	752		$	158		$	1,134		$	-	$	39		$	2,315

	Commercial, financial and agricultural		Real estate - commercial			Real estate - construction			Real estate - mortgage			Obligations of states and political subdivisions		Personal			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance	$	232	$	752		$	158		$	1,134		$	-	$	39		$	2,315
evaluated for impairment
individually	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	2		$	-	$	-		$	2
collectively	$	232	$	752		$	158		$	1,132		$	-	$	39		$	2,313

Loans:
Ending balance	$	27,032	$	102,524		$	21,065		$	135,802		$	13,427	$	4,273		$	304,123
evaluated for impairment
individually	$	-	$	2,334		$	312		$	3,035		$	-	$	-		$	5,681
collectively	$	27,032	$	100,190		$	20,753		$	132,767		$	13,427	$	4,273		$	298,442

As of, and for the period ended, June 30, 2014

Allowance for loan losses:	Commercial, financial and agricultural			Real estate - commercial			Real estate - construction			Real estate - mortgage			Obligations of states and political subdivisions		Personal			Total
Beginning balance, April 1, 2014	$	250		$	615		$	172		$	1,223		$	-	$	40		$	2,300
Charge-offs		(1	)		(5	)		-			(58	)		-		-			(64	)
Recoveries		1			4			-			-			-		-			5
Provisions		(25	)		75			23			43			-		1			117
Ending balance, June 30, 2014	$	225		$	689		$	195		$	1,208		$	-	$	41		$	2,358

Beginning balance, January 1, 2014	$	253		$	534		$	212		$	1,246		$	-	$	42		$	2,287
Charge-offs		(2	)		(5	)		-			(63	)		-		(3	)		(73	)
Recoveries		3			4			-			-			-		-			7
Provisions		(29	)		156			(17	)		25			-		2			137
Ending balance, June 30, 2014	$	225		$	689		$	195		$	1,208		$	-	$	41		$	2,358

	Commercial, financial and agricultural		Real estate - commercial		Real estate - construction		Real estate - mortgage		Obligations of states and political subdivisions		Personal		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance	$	225	$	689	$	195	$	1,208	$	-	$	41	$	2,358
evaluated for impairment
individually	$	-	$	112	$	76	$	36	$	-	$	-	$	224
collectively	$	225	$	577	$	119	$	1,172	$	-	$	41	$	2,134

Loans:
Ending balance	$	23,721	$	84,207	$	18,274	$	136,840	$	10,904	$	4,398	$	278,344
evaluated for impairment
individually	$	6	$	2,533	$	525	$	3,477	$	-	$	-	$	6,541
collectively	$	23,715	$	81,674	$	17,749	$	133,363	$	10,904	$	4,398	$	271,803

As of December 31, 2014

As of December 31, 2014	Commercial, financial and agricultural		Real estate - commercial		Real estate - construction		Real estate - mortgage		Obligations of states and political subdivisions		Personal		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance	$	222	$	665	$	155	$	1,300	$	-	$	38	$	2,380
evaluated for impairment
individually	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	150	$	-	$	-	$	150
collectively	$	222	$	665	$	155	$	1,150	$	-	$	38	$	2,230

Loans:
Ending balance	$	23,738	$	90,000	$	20,713	$	140,676	$	15,730	$	4,044	$	294,901
evaluated for impairment
individually	$	1	$	2,264	$	336	$	3,952	$	-	$	-	$	6,553
collectively	$	23,737	$	87,736	$	20,377	$	136,724	$	15,730	$	4,044	$	288,348

7. Goodwill and core deposit intangible

On September 8, 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of a branch office in Richfield, PA. Goodwill at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $2,046,000. Core deposit intangible was $52,000 net of amortization of $397,000 at June 30, 2015 and $74,000 net of amortization of $375,000 at December 31, 2014. The core deposit intangible is being amortized over a ten-year period on a straight line basis. Core deposit amortization expense was $11,000 and $22,000 in each of the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The goodwill is not amortized, but is measured annually for impairment or more frequently if certain events occur which might indicate goodwill has been impaired. There was no impairment of goodwill during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015 or 2014.

8. Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiary

The Company owns 39.16% of the outstanding common stock of Liverpool Community Bank (LCB), Liverpool, PA. This investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and is being carried at $4,457,000 as of June 30, 2015. The Company increases its investment in LCB for its share of earnings and decreases its investment by any dividends received from LCB. The investment is evaluated quarterly for impairment. A loss in value of the investment which is determined to be other than a temporary decline would be recognized as a loss in the period in which such determination is made. Evidence of a loss in value might include, but would not necessarily be limited to, absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment or inability of LCB to sustain an earnings capacity that would justify the current carrying value of the investment. There was no impairment of goodwill during the three or six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

9. Fair Value Measurement

Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. Additional guidance is provided on determining when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased. The guidance also includes guidance on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.

Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed, and significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with fair value measurement and disclosure guidance.

This guidance clarifies that, when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the entity must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly. The guidance provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.

Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability is not adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost). Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, the guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

An asset’s or liability’s placement in the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.

In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and the Company’s creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

Securities Available for Sale. Debt securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurement from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things. Equity securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value using Level 1 inputs.

Impaired Loans. Certain impaired loans are reported on a non-recurring basis at the fair value of the underlying collateral since repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.

Other Real Estate Owned. Certain assets included in other real estate owned are carried at fair value as a result of impairment and accordingly are presented as measured on a non-recurring basis. Values are estimated using Level 3 inputs, based on appraisals that consider the sales prices of property in the proximate vicinity.

Mortgage Servicing Rights. The fair value of servicing assets is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows on pools of mortgages stratified by rate and maturity date and are considered Level 3 inputs.

The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value (in thousands). There were no transfers of assets between fair value Level 1 and Level 2 during the six months ended June 30, 2015 or 2014.

			(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
			Quoted Prices in		Significant		Significant
			Active Markets		Other		Other
	June 30,		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	2015		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Debt securities available-for-sale:
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	36,828	$	-	$	36,828	$	-
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		32,894		-		32,894		-
Mortgage-backed securities		67,054		-		67,054		-
Equity securities available-for-sale		1,572		1,572		-		-

Measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans		2,676		-		-		2,676
Mortgage servicing rights		204		-		-		204

			(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
			Quoted Prices in		Significant		Significant
			Active Markets		Other		Other
	December 31,		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	2014		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Debt securities available-for-sale:
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	50,101	$	-	$	50,101	$	-
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		35,873		-		35,873		-
Mortgage-backed securities		55,429		-		55,429		-
Equity securities available-for-sale		1,500		1,500		-		-

Measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans		3,370		-		-		3,370
Mortgage servicing rights		193		-		-		193

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which Level 3 inputs have been used to determine fair value:

June 30, 2015	Fair Value Estimate		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range		Weighted Average
Impaired loans	$	2,676	Appraisal of collateral (1)	Appraisal and liquidation adjustments (2)		(7)% - (20)%		(15.8	)%
Mortgage servicing rights		204	Multiple of annual servicing fee	Estimated pre-payment speed, based on rate and term		300% - 400%		363	%

December 31, 2014	Fair Value Estimate		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range		Weighted Average
Impaired loans	$	3,370	Appraisal of collateral (1)	Appraisal and liquidation adjustments (2)		(7)% - (15)%		(11.2	)%
Mortgage servicing rights		193	Multiple of annual servicing fee	Estimated pre-payment speed, based on rate and term		300% - 400%		360	%

(1)

Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral that generally include various level 3 inputs which are not identifiable.

(2)

Appraisals may be adjusted downward by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percent of the appraisal.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in sales transactions on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these consolidated financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different from the amounts reported at each quarter end.

The information presented below should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair value calculation is provided only for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful.

The following describes the estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments as well as the significant methods and assumptions not previously disclosed used to determine these estimated fair values.

Carrying values approximate fair value for cash and due from banks, interest-bearing demand deposits with banks, restricted stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank, loans held for sale, interest receivable, mortgage servicing rights, non-interest bearing deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, short-term borrowings and interest payable. Other than cash and due from banks, which are considered Level 1 inputs, and mortgage servicing rights, which are Level 3 inputs, these instruments are Level 2 inputs.

Interest bearing time deposits with banks - The estimated fair value is determined by discounting the contractual future cash flows, using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Loans – For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and which entail no significant changes in credit risk, carrying values approximated fair value. Substantially all commercial loans and real estate mortgages are variable rate loans. The fair value of other loans (i.e. consumer loans and fixed-rate real estate mortgages) is estimated by calculating the present value of the cash flow difference between the current rate and the market rate, for the average maturity, discounted quarterly at the market rate.

Fixed rate time deposits - The estimated fair value is determined by discounting the contractual future cash flows, using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Long term debt and other interest bearing liabilities – The fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on incremental borrowing rates for similar types of arrangements.

Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit – The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account market interest rates, the remaining terms and present credit-worthiness of the counterparties. The fair value of guarantees and letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):

Financial Instruments

(in thousands)

	June 30, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value		Value		Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	7,746	$	7,746	$	6,757	$	6,757
Interest bearing deposits with banks		247		247		10		10
Securities		138,348		138,348		142,903		142,903
Restricted investment in FHLB stock		3,055		3,055		2,726		2,726
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		301,808		298,967		292,521		294,083
Mortgage servicing rights		204		204		193		193
Accrued interest receivable		1,463		1,463		1,491		1,491

Financial liabilities:
Non-interest bearing deposits		79,043		79,043		77,697		77,697
Interest bearing deposits		299,723		301,827		303,187		305,635
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		3,926		3,926		4,594		4,594
Short-term borrowings		25,450		25,450		15,950		15,950
Long-term debt		22,500		22,587		22,500		22,464
Other interest bearing liabilities		1,430		1,435		1,412		1,416
Accrued interest payable		230		230		301		301

Off-balance sheet financial instruments:
Commitments to extend credit		-		-		-		-
Letters of credit		-		-		-		-

The following presents the carrying amount, fair value and placement in the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial instruments not previously disclosed as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. This table excludes financial instruments for which the carrying amount approximates fair value (in thousands).

					(Level 1)
					Quoted Prices in		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
					Active Markets		Significant		Significant
					for Identical		Other		Other
June 30, 2015	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Assets or Liabilities		Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
Financial instruments - Assets
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	$	301,808	$	298,967	$	-	$	-	$	298,967
Financial instruments - Liabilities
Interest bearing deposits		299,723		301,827		-		301,827		-
Long-term debt		22,500		22,587				22,587
Other interest bearing liabilities		1,430		1,435		-		1,435		-

					(Level 1)
					Quoted Prices in		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
					Active Markets		Significant		Significant
					for Identical		Other		Other
December 31, 2014	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Assets or Liabilities		Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
Financial instruments - Assets
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		292,521		294,083		-		-		294,083
Financial instruments - Liabilities
Interest bearing deposits		303,187		305,635		-		305,635		-
Long-term debt		22,500		22,464				22,464
Other interest bearing liabilities		1,412		1,416		-		1,416		-

10. Defined Benefit Retirement Plan

The Company sponsors a defined benefit retirement Plan (the “Plan”) which covers substantially all of its employees employed prior to December 31, 2007. As of January 1, 2008, the Plan was amended to close the Plan to new entrants. All active participants as of December 31, 2007 became 100% vested in their accrued benefit and, as long as they remained eligible, continued to accrue benefits until December 31, 2012. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee’s compensation. Effective December 31, 2012, the Plan was amended (frozen) to cease future service accruals after that date. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute annually no more than the maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes. Contributions are intended to provide for benefits attributed to service through December 31, 2012. The Company has made no contributions in the first six months of 2015 and does not expect to contribute to the Plan in the remainder of 2015. Pension expense included the following components for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:

(Dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
Components of net periodic pension cost (income)
Interest cost	$	113		$	107		$	225		$	213
Expected return on plan assets		(148	)		(130	)		(296	)		(259	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		60			10			121			20
Net periodic pension cost (income)		25			(13	)		50			(26	)

Amortization of net actuarial loss recognized in other comprehensive income	$	(60	)	$	(10	)	$	(121	)	$	(20	)

Total recognized in net periodic pension cost and other comprehensive income	$	(35	)	$	(23	)	$	(71	)	$	(46	)

11. Commitments, Contingent Liabilities and Guarantees

In the ordinary course of business, the Company makes commitments to extend credit to its customers through letters of credit, loan commitments and lines of credit. At June 30, 2015, the Company had $40,046,000 outstanding in loan commitments and other unused lines of credit extended to its customers as compared to $45,021,000 at December 31, 2014.

The Company does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or disclosure, other than its letters of credit. Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Generally, financial and performance letters of credit have expiration dates within one year of issuance, while commercial letters of credit have longer term commitments. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as the risks that are involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Company generally holds collateral and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments. The Company had outstanding $1,669,000 and $1,703,000 of financial and performance letters of credit commitments as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Commercial letters of credit as of June 30, 2015 totaled $10,900,000. As of December 31, 2014, there were no commercial letters of credit. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient to cover the potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding guarantees. The current amount of the liability as of June 30, 2015 for payments under letters of credit issued was not material. Because these instruments have fixed maturity dates, and because many of them will expire without being drawn upon, they do not generally present any significant liquidity risk.

Additionally, the Company has committed to fund and sell qualifying residential mortgage loans to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh in the total amount of $15,000,000. As of June 30, 2015, $8,243,000 remains to be delivered on that commitment, of which none has been committed to borrowers.

12. Agreement and Plan of Merger

On June 26, 2015, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with FNBPA Bancorp, Inc. (“FNBPA”) pursuant to which the Company will acquire all of the shares of FNBPA Bancorp in a stock and cash transaction. Under the Merger Agreement, FNBPA Bancorp shareholders may elect to receive, in exchange for each share of FNBPA Bancorp common stock they own, either cash of $50.34 or 2.7813 shares of Juniata Valley Financial Corp. (“JUVF”) common stock, subject to election and allocation procedures designed to result in the aggregate cash merger consideration representing between 15% and 25% of the total merger consideration issued in the transaction. The transaction is valued at approximately $13.2 million.

The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, FNBPA will merge with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving entity (the “Merger”). Immediately following the consummation of the Merger, First National Bank of Port Allegany, a national banking association and wholly-owned subsidiary of FNBPA, will merge with and into The Juniata Valley Bank (“JVB”), a Pennsylvania-state chartered bank and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, with JVB continuing as the surviving entity. The Merger Agreement was approved by the Board of Directors of each of the Company and FNBPA. FNBPA shareholders may seek appraisal rights as dissenting shareholders under Pennsylvania law.

The merger is subject to customary closing conditions enumerated in the merger agreement, including receipt of regulatory approvals and the approval of both the Company’s and FNBPA’s shareholders. It is anticipated that the transaction will close by the end of 2015.

13. Subsequent Event

In July 2015, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.22 per share to shareholders of record on August 14, 2015, payable on September 1, 2015.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward Looking Statements:

The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward looking statements (as such term is defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the regulations thereunder) including statements which are not historical facts or address trends or management's intentions, plans, beliefs, expectations or opinions. Such forward looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and may be affected by various factors which may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements including, without limitation:

the effect of market interest rates, particularly a continuing period of low market interest rates, and relative balances of rate-sensitive assets to rate-sensitive liabilities, on net interest margin and net interest income; the effect of competition on rates of deposit and loan growth and net interest margin;

the impact of adverse changes in the economy and real estate markets, including protracted periods of low-growth and sluggish loan demand;

increases in non-performing assets, which may result in increases in the allowance for credit losses, loan charge-offs and elevated collection and carrying costs related to such non-performing assets;

other income growth, including the impact of regulatory changes which have reduced debit card interchange revenue;

investment securities gains and losses, including other than temporary declines in the value of securities which may result in charges to earnings;

the level of other expenses, including salaries and employee benefit expenses;

the increasing time and expense associated with regulatory compliance and risk management;

the uncertainty and lack of clear regulatory guidance associated with the delay in implementing many of the regulations mandated by the Dodd Frank Act; and

capital and liquidity strategies, including the expected impact of the capital and liquidity requirements proposed by the Basel III standards.

non-recurring expenses related to the merger and incurred as a result of integrating operations could affect the results of operations in the period in which such charges are recorded.

The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise forward looking information, whether as a result of new or updated information, future events or otherwise. For a more complete discussion of certain risks, uncertainties and other factors affecting the Company, refer to the Company’s Risk Factors, contained in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, and Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, a copy of which may be obtained from the Company upon request and without charge (except for the exhibits thereto).

Critical Accounting Policies:

Disclosure of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Some of these policies require significant judgments, estimates, and assumptions to be made by management, most particularly in connection with determining the provision for loan losses and the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses, as well as management’s evaluation of the investment portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment. There have been no changes in critical accounting policies since December 31, 2014.

General:

The following discussion relates to the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2015, as compared to December 31, 2014, and the consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the interim consolidated financial statements and related notes included herein.

Overview:

Juniata Valley Financial Corp. is a Pennsylvania corporation organized in 1983 to be the holding company of The Juniata Valley Bank. The Bank is a state-chartered bank headquartered in Mifflintown, Pennsylvania. Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and its subsidiary bank derive substantially all of their income from banking and bank-related services, including interest earned on residential real estate, commercial mortgage, commercial and consumer loans, interest earned on investment securities and fee income from deposit services and other financial services to its customers through 12 locations in central Pennsylvania. Juniata Valley Financial Corp. also owns 39.16% of Liverpool Community Bank (LCB), located in Liverpool, Pennsylvania. The Company accounts for LCB as an unconsolidated subsidiary using the equity method of accounting.

Financial Condition:

Total assets as of June 30, 2015, were $487.1 million, an increase of 1.4% compared to December 31, 2014. Comparing the balances at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, deposits decreased by $2.1 million, with non-interest bearing deposits increasing by $1.3 million and interest-bearing deposits decreasing by $3.4 million. The Company’s investment portfolio decreased by $4.6 million and borrowings increased by $9.5 million.

The table below shows changes in deposit volumes by type of deposit (in thousands of dollars) between December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015.

	June 30,		December 31,		Change
	2015		2014		$			%
Deposits:
Demand, non-interest bearing	$	79,043	$	77,697	$	1,346			1.7	%
Interest bearing demand and money market		100,170		95,675		4,495			4.7
Savings		72,943		67,430		5,513			8.2
Time deposits, $100,000 and more		24,194		27,705		(3,511	)		(12.7	)
Other time deposits		102,416		112,377		(9,961	)		(8.9	)
Total deposits	$	378,766	$	380,884	$	(2,118	)		(0.6	)%

Overall, total loans increased $9.2 million, or 3.1%, between December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2015, as shown in the table below (in thousands of dollars), primarily due to decreases in real estate mortgage loans and loans to obligations of states and political subdivisions.

	June 30,		December 31,		Change
	2015		2014		$			%
Loans:
Commercial, financial and agricultural	$	27,032	$	23,738	$	3,294			13.9	%
Real estate - commercial		102,524		90,000		12,524			13.9
Real estate - construction		21,065		20,713		352			1.7
Real estate - mortgage		135,802		140,676		(4,874	)		(3.5	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		13,427		15,730		(2,303	)		(14.6	)
Personal		4,273		4,044		229			5.7
Total loans	$	304,123	$	294,901	$	9,222			3.1	%

A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses for each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands) is presented below.

	Periods Ended June 30,
	2015			2014
Balance of allowance - January 1	$	2,380		$	2,287
Loans charged off		(233	)		(73	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		6			7
Net charge-offs		(227	)		(66	)
Provision for loan losses		162			137
Balance of allowance - end of period	$	2,315		$	2,358

Ratio of net charge-offs during period to average loans outstanding		0.08	%		0.02	%

During the first six months of 2015, the Company recorded charge-offs of $233,000, partially offset by $6,000 in recoveries.

As of June 30, 2015, 45 loans, with aggregate outstanding balances of $5,681,000, were individually evaluated for impairment. A collateral analysis was performed on each of these 45 loans in order to establish a portion of the reserve needed to carry impaired loans at fair value. As a result, one loan was determined to have insufficient collateral, and a specific reserve, totaling $2,000, was established for the impaired loan.

Management believes that the specific reserves carried are adequate to cover potential future losses related to these relationships. There are no other material loans classified as loss, doubtful, substandard, or special mention which management expects to significantly impact future operating results, liquidity or capital resources.

Following is a summary of the Bank’s non-performing loans on June 30, 2015 as compared to December 31, 2014.

(Dollar amounts in thousands)

	As of and for the			As of and for the
	six months ended			year ended
Non-performing loans	June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
Non-accrual loans	$	4,415		$	4,880
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more		30			400
Restructured nonaccrual loans in default		-			366
Total	$	4,445		$	5,646

Average loans outstanding	$	293,334		$	281,608

Ratio of non-performing loans to average loans outstanding		1.52	%		2.00	%

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company initiated a leverage strategy and issued long-term debt in the amount of $22,500,000, with maturities ranging from two years to five years, at fixed rates ranging from 0.63% to 2.0%. The funds were used to purchase investment securities with similar projected average lives.

Stockholders’ equity increased from December 31, 2014 to June 30, 2015 by $246,000, or 0.5%. The Company’s net income exceeded dividends paid by $82,000. The adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income of $80,000 to record the amortization of the net actuarial loss of the Company’s defined benefit retirement plan added $79,000 to the Company’s equity. The market value of securities available for sale remained relatively unchanged when comparing June 30, 2015 to December 31, 2014, resulting in nominal effect on shareholders’ equity. The Company’s employees invested $57,000 pursuant to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and were issued a total of 3,242 shares of stock during the second quarter of 2015, and stock based compensation expense recorded pursuant to the Company’s Stock Option Plan added $27,000 during the six month period.

Subsequent to June 30, 2015, the following event took place:

On July 21, 2015, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.22 per share to shareholders of record on August 14, 2015, payable on September 1, 2015.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

Operations Overview:

Net income for the second quarter of 2015 was $1,001,000, a decrease of $162,000, or 13.9%, when compared to the second quarter of 2014. The decrease was due primarily to increased cost of employee benefits and higher non-interest expense, which included merger and acquisition costs, in the second quarter of 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014, as well as reduced non-interest income; these factors offset an increase in net interest income. The reduction in non-interest income in the second quarter of 2015 was due to the receipt of significant life insurance proceeds in the second quarter of 2014, offset by an increase in customer service fees. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.24 in the second quarter of 2015 compared to $0.28 in the second quarter of 2014. Presented below are selected key ratios for the two periods:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2015			2014
Return on average assets (annualized)		0.84	%		0.97	%
Return on average equity (annualized)		7.99	%		9.23	%
Average equity to average assets		10.55	%		10.56	%

Non-interest income, excluding securities gains, as a percentage of average assets (annualized)		0.95	%		0.98	%
Non-interest expense as a percentage of average assets (annualized)		3.05	%		2.85	%

The discussion that follows further explains changes in the components of net income when comparing the second quarter of 2015 with the second quarter of 2014.

Net Interest Income:

Net interest income was $3,724,000 for the second quarter of 2015, as compared to $3,642,000 in the same quarter in 2014. Average earning assets decreased by 0.6%, and the net interest margin, on a fully tax equivalent basis, increased by 10 basis points.

Although average loan balances increased by $17.3 million, or 6.2%, interest on loans decreased $114,000 in the second quarter of 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. A decrease of 46 basis points in the average weighted yield on loans reducing interest income by approximately $326,000, offset an increase in average loans outstanding, which increased interest income by $212,000.

Interest earned on investment securities increased $10,000 in the second quarter of 2015 as compared to the second quarter of 2014. Yield increases added $79,000, while average balance reductions reduced interest income by $69,000. The overall pre-tax yield on the investment securities portfolio increased during the period by 22 basis points, with the average balance decreasing to $15.6 million.

Total average earning assets during the second quarter of 2015 were $433.8 million, compared to $436.3 million during the second quarter of 2014, yielding 3.89% in 2015 versus 3.97% in 2014. Average interest-bearing liabilities decreased by $4.9 million, including an increase in average non-interest bearing deposits of $1.4 million. The decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities was due to a reduction in time deposits. The cost to fund interest bearing liabilities dropped by 21 basis points, to 0.59%, in the second quarter of 2015 compared to the second quarter of 2014.

Net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the second quarter of 2015 was 3.57%. For the same period in 2014, the fully-tax equivalent net interest margin was 3.47%.

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS

(Dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended							Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2015							June 30, 2014
	Average				Yield/			Average				Yield/			Increase (Decrease) Due To (6)
	Balance (1)		Interest		Rate			Balance (1)		Interest		Rate			Volume			Rate			Total
ASSETS
Interest earning assets:
Taxable loans (5)	$	270,602	$	3,372		4.98	%	$	256,094	$	3,508		5.48	%	$	191		$	(327	)	$	(136	)
Tax-exempt loans		23,090		176		3.09			20,346		154		3.04			21			1			22
Total loans		293,692		3,548		4.84			276,440		3,662		5.30			212			(326	)		(114	)
Taxable investment securities		110,294		557		2.02			121,234		535		1.77			(51	)		73			22
Tax-exempt investment securities		29,056		114		1.57			33,696		126		1.50			(18	)		6			(12	)
Total investment securities		139,350		671		1.93			154,930		661		1.71			(69	)		79			10

Interest bearing deposits		785		1		0.41			3,393		1		0.12			(1	)		1			-
Federal funds sold		-		-					1,521		1		0.26			(1	)		-			(1	)
Total interest earning assets		433,827		4,220		3.89			436,284		4,325		3.97			141			(246	)		(105	)

Other assets (7)		41,190							41,296
Total assets	$	475,017						$	477,580
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand deposits (2)	$	99,456		40		0.16		$	99,085		44		0.18			-			(4	)		(4	)
Savings deposits		72,280		18		0.10			66,848		16		0.10			1			1			2
Time deposits		129,721		355		1.11			149,674		548		1.47			(67	)		(126	)		(193	)
Short-term and long-term borrowings and other interest bearing liabilities		37,854		83		0.88			28,642		75		1.05			22			(14	)		8
Total interest bearing liabilities		339,311		496		0.59			344,249		683		0.80			(44	)		(143	)		(187	)

Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		80,393							78,970
Other		5,190							3,937
Stockholders' equity		50,123							50,424
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	475,017						$	477,580
Net interest income and net interest rate spread			$	3,724		3.30	%			$	3,642		3.17	%	$	185		$	(103	)	$	82
Net interest margin on interest earning assets (3)						3.43	%						3.34	%
Net interest income and net interest margin-Tax equivalent basis (4)			$	3,873		3.57	%			$	3,786		3.47	%

Notes:

1) Average balances were calculated using a daily average.

2) Includes interest-bearing demand and money market accounts.

3) Net margin on interest earning assets is net interest income divided by average interest earning assets.

4) Interest on obligations of states and municipalities is not subject to federal income tax. In order to make the net yield comparable on a fully taxable basis, a tax equivalent adjustment is applied against the tax-exempt income utilizing a federal tax rate of 34%.

5) Non-accruing loans are included in the above table until they are charged off.

6) The change in interest due to rate and volume has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.

(7) Includes gross unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale.

Provision for Loan Losses:

In the second quarter of 2015, the provision for loan losses was $112,000, as compared to a provision of $117,000 in the second quarter of 2014. Management regularly reviews the adequacy of the loan loss reserve and makes assessments as to specific loan impairment, historical charge-off expectations, general economic conditions in the Bank’s market area, specific loan quality and other factors. As of June 30, 2015, non-performing loans as a percentage of average outstanding loans was 1.52%, improved from 2.00% on December 31, 2014 and from 2.06% on June 30, 2014. Factors affecting the provision for loan losses were the improvement in non-performing loans partially offset by provisioning for increased loan balances and credit concentrations. See the earlier discussion in the Financial Condition section, explaining the information used to determine the provision.

Non-interest Income:

Non-interest income in the second quarter of 2015 was $1,130,000, compared to $1,170,000 in the second quarter of 2014, representing a decrease of $40,000, or 3.4%.

Most significantly impacting recurring non-interest income in the second quarter of 2015 was an increase in customer service fees of $99,000, or 34.1%, in the second quarter of 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. The increase was attributable to the repricing and introduction of a new checking account lineup in the third quarter of 2014, which includes a new service to depositors that provides detection, suppression and repair of a wide spectrum of identity theft issues. Also significantly impacting the comparative second quarter periods was a $165,000 gain from life insurance proceeds recorded in the second quarter of 2014 and no such gain was recorded in the 2015 period. As the Company carries BOLI, gains such as this can occur inconsistently at any time, and no such gain was present in 2015. Another non-recurring item in the second quarter of 2014 was a lump-sum fee of $40,000 collected on a terminated trust relationship, resulting in elevated trust fees for that period. Fee income from trust services decreased by $47,000, or 35.9%, because as the 2014 second quarter included the aforementioned lump-sum termination fee of $40,000.

Commissions from the sales of non-deposit products increased in the second quarter of 2015 by $30,000, or 34.1%, as sales activity increased. Income from the unconsolidated subsidiary increased $5,000, or 8.8%, in the second quarter of 2015 compared to the second quarter of 2014. Fees derived from loan activity increased by $20,000, or 62.5%, due primarily to an increase in title insurance fees.

The Company originates mortgages to sell on the secondary market, while retaining the servicing rights; the Company has built a servicing portfolio of approximately $21.8 million as of June 30, 2015. The mortgage servicing right asset, as of June 30, 2015, was $204,000. Mortgage banking income is made up of origination and servicing fees collected from the buyer, origination points collected from the borrower and an adjustment to the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights asset. In the second quarter of 2015, mortgage banking income was $60,000, an increase of 4,000, or 7.1%, from the second quarter of 2014.

Less significant changes in non-interest income categories included slight changes in debit card fee income, earnings on bank-owned life insurance and other miscellaneous income.

Net gains of $1,000 were realized on the sale of securities in the second quarter of 2015 as compared to the second quarter of 2014 when net gains of $2,000 were realized.

As a percentage of average assets, annualized non-interest income, exclusive of net gains on the sale of securities, was 0.95% in the second quarter of 2015 as compared to 0.98% in the second quarter of 2014. Excluding the gain from life insurance proceeds mentioned above, the ratio in the second quarter of 2014 would have been 0.84%.

Non-interest Expense:

Total non-interest expense for the second quarter of 2015 was $3,621,000, or 6.4%, higher in the second quarter of 2015 as compared to the second quarter of 2014. Employee compensation expense decreased by $7,000, due primarily to staffing efficiencies. Employee benefits costs increased by $110,000, or 30.3%, due to increased medical insurance and defined benefit plan costs.

Occupancy and equipment costs increased a total of $33,000, or 9.3%, in the second quarter of 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014 due primarily to increased costs for utilities and maintenance. Data processing expense was higher by $20,000, or $5.4% in the comparative periods as electronic services to customers continue to expand. Other real estate owned acquired as a result of foreclosure activity were sold in both periods, yielding a gain of $29,000 in the second quarter of 2014 versus a net loss of $5,000 in the second quarter of 2015. Merger and acquisition costs related to the aforementioned definitive merger agreement were $48,000 in the second quarter of 2015, while no such costs were occurred in the second quarter of 2014. The category of “other non-interest expense” increased by $30,000 in the second quarter of 2015 when compared to the second quarter of 2014, due mostly to increased advertising costs, foreclosure activity costs and employee benefit accounting costs.

As a percentage of average assets, annualized non-interest expense was 3.05% in the second quarter of 2015 compared to 2.85% in the second quarter of 2014.

Provision for income taxes:

Income tax expense in the second quarter of 2015 was $120,000 as compared to the $131,000 recorded in the second quarter of 2014. The Company qualifies for a federal tax credit for a low-income housing project investment, and the tax provisions for each period reflect the application of the tax credit. For the second quarter of 2015, the tax credit lowered the effective tax rate from 23.5% to 10.7%. In the second quarter of 2014, when earnings from tax exempt sources were lower and the tax credit for the period was higher, the effective tax rate was lowered from 21.3% to 10.1%.

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

Operations Overview:

Net income for the six months of 2015 was $1,925,000, a decrease of $141,000, or 6.8%, compared to the first six months of 2014. The decrease was due primarily to increased employee benefits costs. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.46 in the first six months of 2015, representing a decrease of 6.1% from the $0.49 earned in the first six months of 2014. Annualized return on average equity for the first six months in 2014 was 7.68%, compared to 8.20% for the same period in the prior year, a decrease of 6.3%. For the six months ended June 30, annualized return on average assets was 0.81% in 2015, versus 0.89% in 2014.

Presented below are selected key ratios for the two periods:

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2015			2014
Return on average assets (annualized)		0.81	%		0.89	%
Return on average equity (annualized)		7.68	%		8.20	%
Average equity to average assets		10.55	%		10.91	%

Non-interest income, excluding securities gains, as a percentage of average assets (annualized)		0.90	%		0.90	%
Non-interest expense as a percentage of average assets (annualized)		3.04	%		2.92	%

The discussion that follows explains changes in the components of net income when comparing the first six months of 2015 with the first six months of 2014.

Net Interest Income:

Net interest income was $7,385,000 for the first six months of 2015, as compared to $7,051,000 in the same period in 2014, an increase of $334,000, or 4.7%. Average earning assets increased by $13.9 million, or 3.3%, and the net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis increased by 4 basis points.

On average, loans outstanding increased by $17.4 million, or 6.3%. Interest on loans decreased $117,000, or 1.6%, in the first six months of 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. An average weighted yield decrease of 39 basis points lowered interest income by approximately $542,000, while the higher volume of loans partially offset that decrease by $425,000.

Interest earned on investment securities increased $204,000 in the first six months of 2015 as compared to 2014, with average balances decreasing $0.6 million during the period. The overall pre-tax yield on the investment securities portfolio increased during the period by 30 basis points.

Average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $10.7 million, including an increase in average non-interest bearing deposits of $1.9 million. The cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased by 19 basis points as a result of the lower general rate environment and the shift in the mix of interest bearing liabilities.

Total average earning assets during the first six months of 2015 were $434.6 million, compared to $420.7 million during the first six months of 2014, yielding 3.89% in 2015 versus 3.98% in 2014. Funding costs for earning assets were 0.49% and 0.63% for the first six months of 2015 and 2014, respectively. Net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the first six months of 2015 was 3.53%. For the same period in 2014, the fully-tax equivalent net interest margin was 3.49%.

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS

(Dollars in thousands)

	Six Months Ended							Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2015							June 30, 2014
	Average				Yield/			Average				Yield/			Increase (Decrease) Due To (6)
	Balance (1)		Interest		Rate			Balance (1)		Interest		Rate			Volume			Rate			Total
ASSETS
Interest earning assets:
Taxable loans (5)	$	269,831	$	6,752		5.00	%	$	254,815	$	6,900		5.42	%	$	389		$	(537	)	$	(148	)
Tax-exempt loans		23,503		343		2.94			21,073		312		2.99			36			(5	)		31
Total loans		293,334		7,095		4.84			275,888		7,212		5.23			425			(542	)		(117	)
Taxable investment securities		110,920		1,118		2.02			106,995		890		1.66			31			197			228
Tax-exempt investment securities		29,839		232		1.56			34,361		256		1.49			(35	)		11			(24	)
Total investment securities		140,759		1,350		1.92			141,356		1,146		1.62			(4	)		208			204

Interest bearing deposits		475		1		0.42			2,498		2		0.16			(2	)		1			(1	)
Federal funds sold		31		-		0.05			917		1		0.22			(1	)		-			(1	)
Total interest earning assets		434,599		8,446		3.89			420,659		8,361		3.98			418			(333	)		85

Other assets (7)		41,031							41,447
Total assets	$	475,630						$	462,106
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand deposits (2)	$	96,635		74		0.15		$	95,299		80		0.17			1			(7	)		(6	)
Savings deposits		70,750		35		0.10			65,012		32		0.10			3			-			3
Time deposits		133,533		785		1.19			151,402		1,117		1.49			(122	)		(210	)		(332	)
Short-term and long term borrowings and other interest bearing liabilities		39,971		167		0.84			18,433		81		0.89			90			(4	)		86
Total interest bearing liabilities		340,889		1,061		0.62			330,146		1,310		0.81			(28	)		(221	)		(249	)

Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		79,456							77,558
Other		5,124							4,001
Stockholders' equity		50,161							50,401
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	475,630						$	462,106
Net interest income and net interest rate spread			$	7,385		3.27	%			$	7,051		3.17	%	$	446		$	(112	)	$	334
Net interest margin on interest earning assets (3)						3.40	%						3.35	%
Net interest income and net interest margin-Tax equivalent basis (4)			$	7,681		3.53	%			$	7,344		3.49	%

Notes:

1) Average balances were calculated using a daily average.

2) Includes interest-bearing demand and money market accounts.

3) Net margin on interest earning assets is net interest income divided by average interest earning assets.

5) Non-accruing loans are included in the above table until they are charged off.

6) The change in interest due to rate and volume has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.

(7) Includes gross unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale.

Provision for Loan Losses:

In the first six months of 2015, the provision for loan losses was $162,000, as compared to a provision of $137,000 in the first six months of 2014. Management regularly reviews the adequacy of the loan loss reserve and makes assessments as to specific loan impairment, historical charge-off expectations, general economic conditions in the Bank’s market area, specific loan quality and other factors. See the earlier discussion in the Financial Condition section, explaining the information used to determine the provision.

Non-interest Income:

Non-interest income in the first six months of 2015 was $2,130,000, an increase of $40,000, or 1.9%, compared to $2,090,000 in the first six months of 2014. The increase was achieved despite several non-recurring income items present in the 2014 period which did not recur in the 2015 period. Most significantly impacting non-interest income in the first six months of 2014 was the gain of $165,000 in death benefits related to bank-owned life insurance. Additionally, trust fee income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 included $40,000 of non-recurring income from the collection of an account termination fee. Excluding these two non-recurring items, non-interest income in the first six months of 2015 exceeded the first six months of 2014 by $245,000, or 13.0%. Most significantly impacting recurring non-interest income in the six months ended June 30, 2015, when comparing to the six months ended June 30, 2014, were revenues from the aforementioned new checking account products. Fees for the new products were primarily responsible for the $195,000, or 34.9%, increase in customer service fees in the 2015 period as compared to the same period in the previous year.

During the first half of 2015, mortgage banking income and other fees derived from loan activity increased in the aggregate by $45,000, or 29.0% from the levels recorded in the first half of 2014 due to increased mortgage origination and title insurance activity.

As a percentage of average assets, annualized non-interest income, exclusive of net gains on the sale of securities, was 0.90% in the first six months of 2015 and 2014.

Non-interest Expense:

Total non-interest expense was $7,225,000 for the first six months of 2015, $488,000, or 7.2%, higher than in the first six months of 2014.

The increase was primarily due to increases in employee compensation and benefits and costs associated with merger and acquisition activities.

Compensation expense for the first six months of 2015 increased by $115,000 as compared to the first six months of 2014, due to a number of factors. Full-time equivalent employment increased as of June 30, 2015 as compared to June 30, 2014, and Company-wide annual salary adjustments occurred early in the second quarter of 2015.

Costs of employee benefits was $1,023,000 in the first six months of 2015 versus $766,000 in the first six months of 2014, representing an increase of $257,000, or 33.6%. The increase was primarily due to higher medical insurance expenses of $165,000 within the Company’s self-funded plan and higher costs associated with the frozen defined benefit plan of $76,000.

Costs associated with merger and acquisition activities added $58,000 of non-interest expense to the first six months of 2015, with no such expenses recorded in the same period one year ago.

As a percentage of average assets, annualized non-interest expense was 3.04% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to 2.92% for the same six month period in 2014.

Provision for income taxes:

Income tax expense in the first six months of 2015 was $203,000 as compared to the $201,000 recorded in the first six months of 2014. The Company qualifies for a federal tax credit for its low-income housing project investment, and the tax provisions for each period reflect the application of the tax credit. The tax credit recorded in the first six months of 2015 and 2014 was $287,000, offsetting $490,000 in regular tax expense in the 2015 period and $488,000 of regular tax expense in the 2014 period. For the first six months of 2015, the tax credit lowered the effective tax rate from 23.0% to 9.6% as compared to the same period in 2014, in which the tax credit lowered the effective tax rate from 21.6% to 8.9%.

Liquidity:

The objective of liquidity management is to ensure that sufficient funding is available, at a reasonable cost, to meet the ongoing operational cash needs of the Company and to take advantage of income producing opportunities as they arise. While the desired level of liquidity will vary depending upon a variety of factors, it is the primary goal of the Company to maintain a high level of liquidity in all economic environments. Principal sources of asset liquidity are provided by loans and securities maturing in one year or less, and other short-term investments, such as federal funds sold and cash and due from banks. Liability liquidity, which is more difficult to measure, can be met by attracting deposits and maintaining the core deposit base. The Company is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh for the purpose of providing short-term liquidity when other sources are unable to fill these needs. During the first six months of 2015, overnight borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank averaged $5,286,000. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had short term borrowings and long-term debt with the Federal Home Loan Bank of $25,450,000 and $22,500,000, respectively, and had remaining unused borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank of $101.6 million.

Funding derived from securities sold under agreements to repurchase (accounted for as collateralized financing transactions) is available through corporate cash management accounts for business customers. This product gives the Company the ability to pay interest on corporate checking accounts.

In view of the sources previously mentioned, management believes that the Company's liquidity is capable of providing the funds needed to meet operational cash needs.

On June 26, 2015, the Company and FNBPA, entered into a merger agreement that provides for the combination of the two companies. Under the merger agreement, FNBPA will merge with and into the Company, with the Company remaining as the surviving entity, and the separate corporate existence of FNBPA will cease. First National Bank of Port Allegany, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FNBPA, will merge with and into JVB, with JVB continuing as the surviving entity. The cash expenditure of the merger is estimated to be between $2,500,000 and $3,800,000 and will be funded by available cash. For further discussion on the merger, please see the Merger Agreement section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements:

The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not reflect various off-balance sheet arrangements that are made in the normal course of business, which may involve some liquidity risk, credit risk, and interest rate risk. These commitments consist mainly of loans approved but not yet funded, unused lines of credit and outstanding letters of credit. These commitments were made using the same credit standards as are used for on-balance sheet instruments. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment terms. Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the financial performance obligation of a customer to a third party. Unused commitments and letters of credit at June 30, 2015 were $40,046,000 and $12,569,000, respectively. Because these instruments have fixed maturity dates, and because many of them will expire without being drawn upon, they do not generally present any significant liquidity risk to the Company. Management believes that any amounts actually drawn upon can be funded in the normal course of operations. Additionally, the Company has committed to fund and sell qualifying residential mortgage loans to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh in the total amount of $15,000,000. As of June 30, 2015, $8,243,000 remains to be delivered on that commitment, of which none has been committed to borrowers. The Company has no investment in or financial relationship with any unconsolidated entities that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on liquidity or the availability of capital resources.

Interest Rate Sensitivity:

Interest rate sensitivity management is overseen by the Asset/Liability Management Committee. This process involves the development and implementation of strategies to maximize net interest margin, while minimizing the earnings risk associated with changing interest rates. Traditional gap analysis identifies the maturity and re-pricing terms of all assets and liabilities. A simulation analysis is used to assess earnings and capital at risk from movements in interest rates. See Item 3 for a description of the complete simulation process and results.

Capital Adequacy:

Bank regulatory authorities in the United States issue risk-based capital standards. These capital standards relate a banking company’s capital to the risk profile of its assets and provide the basis by which all banking companies and banks are evaluated in terms of capital adequacy. Effective January 1, 2015, the risk-based capital rules were modified subject to a transition period for several aspects of the final rules, including the new minimum capital ratio requirements, the capital conservation buffer and the regulatory capital adjustments and deductions. The new framework is commonly called “BASEL III”. The final rules revised federal regulatory agencies’ risk-based and leverage capital requirements and their method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with the Basel III framework. The final rules apply to all depository institutions, top-tier bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $500 million or more, and top-tier savings and loan holding companies (“banking organizations”). Among other things, the rules established a new common equity tier 1 (CET1) minimum capital requirement (4.5% of risk-weighted assets) and a higher minimum tier 1 capital requirement (from 4.0% to 6.0% of risk-weighted assets), and assign higher risk weightings (150%) to exposures that are more than 90 days past due or are on nonaccrual status and certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property.

Basel III requires financial institutions to maintain: (a) a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (which is added to the 4.5% CET1 ratio as that buffer is phased in, effectively resulting in a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7.0%); (b) a minimum ratio of tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 6.0% tier 1 capital ratio as that buffer is phased in, effectively resulting in a minimum tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5% upon full implementation); (c) a minimum ratio of total (that is, tier 1 plus tier 2) capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 8.0% total capital ratio as that buffer is phased in, effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation); and (d) a minimum leverage ratio of 3.0%, calculated as the ratio of tier 1 capital balance sheet exposures plus certain off-balance sheet exposures (computed as the average for each quarter of the month-end ratios for the quarter). In addition, the proposed rules also limit a banking organization’s capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the banking organization does not hold a “capital conservation buffer”.

According to the new rules, CET1 is comprised of common stock plus related surplus, net of treasury stock and other contra-equity components, retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income. However, certain banking institutions, including the Bank, were permitted to make a one-time election to opt out of the requirement to include most components of AOCI in CET1. This opt-out option was available only on March 31, 2015. The Bank elected to opt-out. At June 30, 2015, the Bank exceeded the regulatory requirements to be considered a "well capitalized" financial institution, under the new rules.

Merger Agreement:

On June 26, 2015, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with FNBPA Bancorp, Inc. (“FNBPA”) pursuant to which the Company will acquire all of the shares of FNBPA Bancorp in a stock and cash transaction. Under the Merger Agreement, FNBPA Bancorp shareholders may elect to receive, in exchange for each share of FNBPA Bancorp common stock they own, either cash of $50.34 or 2.7813 shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to election and allocation procedures designed to result in the aggregate cash merger consideration representing between 15% and 25% of the total merger consideration issued in the transaction. The transaction is valued at approximately $13.2 million.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the exposure to economic loss that arises from changes in the values of certain financial instruments. The types of market risk exposures generally faced by financial institutions include equity market price risk, interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and commodity price risk. Due to the nature of its operations, only equity market price risk and interest rate risk are significant to the Company.

Equity market price risk is the risk that changes in the values of equity investments could have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company. The Company’s equity investments consist of common stocks of publicly traded financial institutions.

Declines and volatility in the values of financial institution stocks in the last several years have significantly reduced the likelihood of realizing significant gains in the near-term. Although the Company has realized occasional gains from this portfolio in the past, the primary objective of the portfolio is to achieve value appreciation in the long term while earning consistently attractive after-tax yields from dividends. The carrying value of the financial institutions stocks accounted for 0.3% of the Company’s total assets as of June 30, 2015. Management performs an impairment analysis on the entire investment portfolio, including the financial institutions stocks, on a quarterly basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, no “other-than-temporary” impairment was identified. There is no assurance that declines in market values of the common stock portfolio in the future will not result in “other-than-temporary” impairment charges, depending upon facts and circumstances present.

The equity investments in the Company’s portfolio had an adjusted cost basis of approximately $1,055,000 and a fair value of $1,572,000 at June 30, 2015. Net unrealized gains in this portfolio were approximately $517,000 at June 30, 2015.

In addition to its equity portfolio, the Company’s investment management and trust services revenue could be impacted by fluctuations in the securities markets. A portion of the Company’s trust revenue is based on the value of the underlying investment portfolios. If securities values decline, the Company’s trust revenue could be negatively impacted.

Interest rate risk creates exposure in two primary areas. First, changes in rates have an impact on the Company’s liquidity position and could affect its ability to meet obligations and continue to grow. Second, movements in interest rates can create fluctuations in the Company’s net interest income and changes in the economic value of equity.

The primary objective of the Company’s asset-liability management process is to maximize current and future net interest income within acceptable levels of interest rate risk while satisfying liquidity and capital requirements. Management recognizes that a certain amount of interest rate risk is inherent, appropriate and necessary to ensure profitability. A simulation analysis is used to assess earnings and capital at risk from movements in interest rates. The model considers three major factors: (1) volume differences; (2) repricing differences; and (3) timing in its income simulation. As of the most recent model run, data was disseminated into appropriate repricing buckets, based upon the static position at that time. The interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities were assigned a multiplier to simulate how much that particular balance sheet item would re-price when interest rates change. Finally, the estimated timing effect of rate changes is applied, and the net interest income effect is determined on a static basis (as if no other factors were present). As the table below indicates, based upon rate shock simulations on a static basis, the Company’s balance sheet is relatively rate-neutral as rates decline. Each 100 basis point increase results in approximately $672,000 decline in net interest income in the static environment. This negative effect of rising rates is offset to a degree by the positive effect of imbedded options that include loans floating above their floors and likely internal deposit pricing strategies. After applying the effects of options, over a one-year period, the net effect of an immediate 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis point rate increase would change net interest income by $(290,000), $(554,000), $(1,893,000) and $(2,398,000), respectively. Rate shock modeling was done for a declining rate of 25 basis points only, as the federal funds target rate currently is between zero and 0.25%. As the table below indicates, the net effect of interest rate risk on net interest income is minimal in a rising rate environment through a 200 basis point increase. Juniata’s rate risk policies provide for maximum limits on net interest income that can be at risk for 100 through 400 basis point changes in interest rates.

Effect of Interest Rate Risk on Net Interest Income

(Dollars in thousands)

Change in Interest Rates (Basis Points)	Change in Net Interest Income Due to Interest Rate Risk (Static)			Change in Net Interest Income Due to Imbedded Options			Total Change in Net Interest Income

400	$	(2,689	)	$	291		$	(2,398	)
300		(2,017	)		124			(1,893	)
200		(1,345	)		791			(554	)
100		(672	)		382			(290	)
0		-			-			-
(25)		168			(48	)		120

The net interest income at risk position remained within the guidelines established by the Company’s asset/liability policy.

No material change has been noted in the Bank’s equity value at risk. Please refer to the Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2014 for further discussion of this topic.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2015, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), Rule 13a-15(e). Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. These controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential conditions, regardless of how remote.

Attached as Exhibits 31 and 32 to this quarterly report are certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act. This portion of the Company’s quarterly report includes the information concerning the controls evaluation referred to in the certifications and should be read in conjunction with the certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

	In the opinion of management of the Company, there are no legal proceedings pending to which the Company or its subsidiary is a party or to which its property is subject, which, if determined adversely to the Company or its subsidiary, would be material in relation to the Company’s or its subsidiary’s financial condition. There are no proceedings pending other than ordinary routine litigation incident to the business of the Company or its subsidiary. In addition, no material proceedings are pending or are known to be threatened or contemplated against the Company or its subsidiary by government authorities.

Item 1A.	RISK FACTORS

	There have been no material changes to the risk factors that were disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Item 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

	On March 23, 2001, the Company announced plans to buy back 100,000 (200,000 on a post-split basis) shares of its common stock. There is no expiration date to this buyback plan, but subsequent to the initial plan, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 400,000 additional shares in 2005 and then authorized 200,000 additional shares in September of 2008. There were no transactions pursuant to the repurchase program in the six month period ended June 30, 2015. As of August 10, 2015, the number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program was 33,319. No repurchase plan or program expired during the quarter. The Company has no stock repurchase plan or program that it has determined to terminate prior to expiration or under which it does not intend to make further purchases.

	Certain regulatory restrictions exist regarding the ability of the Bank to transfer funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances. At June 30, 2015, $34,589,000 of undistributed earnings of the Bank, included in the consolidated stockholders’ equity, was available for distribution to the Company as dividends without prior regulatory approval, subject to regulatory capital requirements.

Item 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
	Not applicable

Item 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
	Not applicable

Item 5.	OTHER INFORMATION
	None

Item 6.

EXHIBITS

3.1 - Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-129023 filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005)

3.2 – Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 21, 2007)

3.3 - Bylaw Amendment – (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2012

31.1 - Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a) Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer

31.2 - Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32.1 - Section 1350 Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer

32.2 - Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

101.LAB - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

101.INS - XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		Juniata Valley Financial Corp.
		(Registrant)

Date	08-10-2015	By	/s/ Marcie A. Barber
			Marcie A. Barber, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date	08-10-2015	By	/s/ JoAnn N. McMinn
			JoAnn N. McMinn, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

JUNIATA VALLEY FINANCIAL CORP Reports