Attached files

file filename
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - SB PARTNERSex31-1.htm
EX-99.1 - EXHIBIT 99.1 - SB PARTNERSex99-1.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - SB PARTNERSex32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - SB PARTNERSex31-2.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - SB PARTNERSex32-2.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - SB PARTNERSFinancial_Report.xls

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

 

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

 

FORM 10-K - ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13

OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

(Mark One)

[x] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended

December 31, 2014

 

 

Or

 

[ ]Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

 

For the transition period from ____________________ to ______________________

 

 

Commission file Number: 0-8952

 

SB Partners

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

           

New York

 

13-6294787

           

(State of other Jurisdiction of

 

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

 

Identification No.)

           
           

1 New Haven Avenue, Suite 102A, Milford, Ct.

 

06460

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

           
           

Registrant's telephone number, including area code

 

(203) 283-9593

 
           
           

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

           

Title of each Class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

NONE

 

 

 

           
           

                  Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

           

Units of Limited Partnership Interests

(Title of Class)

  

 
 

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act. [ ] Yes [X] No

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act from their obligations under those sections. [ ] Yes [X] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T(§232.405 of this chapter) during the proceeding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). [ X ] Yes [ ] No

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this

Form 10-K. [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated file, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):

 

[ ] Large Accelerated Filer      [ ] Accelerated Filer      [X] Non-Accelerated Filer      [ ] Smaller Reporting Company

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes [X] No

 

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

 

NOTE: If a determination as to whether a particular person or entity is an affiliate cannot be made without involving unreasonable effort and expense, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates may be calculated on the basis of assumptions reasonable under the circumstances, provided that the assumptions are set forth in this Form.

Not Applicable

 

 

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12,13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. [ ] Yes [ ] No

Not Applicable

 

                               (APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Not Applicable

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g. annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

None

 

 
2

 

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

Description of SB Partners (the “Registrant”)

 

The Registrant is a New York limited partnership formed to engage in acquiring, operating and holding for investment a varying portfolio of real estate interests. The Registrant's initial public offering was in 1971, the year it began operations. As of December 31, 2014, the Registrant owns an industrial flex property in Maple Grove, Minnesota, and a warehouse distribution property in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. In addition, the Registrant has a thirty percent interest in Sentinel Omaha, LLC (“Omaha”). Omaha is a real estate investment company which as of December 31, 2014 owned 14 multifamily properties in 10 markets. Omaha is an affiliate of the Registrant’s general partner.

 

The principal objectives of the Registrant are, first, to obtain capital appreciation through equity investments in real estate; second, to generate cash available for distribution, a portion of which may not be currently taxable; and third, to the extent still permitted under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to generate tax losses which may offset the limited partners' income from the Registrant and certain other sources.

 

The Registrant’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) are available on the SEC’s Website at www.sec.gov and type in 0000087047 for the Registrant’s CIK.

 

Recent Developments and Real Estate Investment Factors

 

Omaha’s portfolio consists exclusively of multi-family properties located in secondary and tertiary markets. During 2014 capitalization rates for older properties in tertiary markets where Omaha owns most of its properties generally were lower than for the prior year. Occupancy improved at some of the properties while occupancy went down at others. Job growth continued to improve but at a slow pace. Omaha reports on a fair value basis and for 2014, Omaha reported an increase in the value of its portfolio of $15,700,000 (5.9%) over 2013. The total real estate portfolio value of $283,300,000 as of December 31, 2014 consists of the same properties which made up Omaha’s portfolio as of December 31, 2013. On September 30, 2013, Omaha executed an amendment and restatement of its unsecured loan extending its maturity to December 31, 2017. The amendment and restatement, among other items, requires Omaha to make specific periodic principal payments on the unsecured loan at scheduled dates through December 31, 2017. It also reduced the pay rate on a portion of the unsecured loan to a float rate of 200 basis points over LIBOR from 450 basis points over LIBOR while increasing the accrual rate on the same portion of the unsecured loan to 500 basis points over LIBOR. However, the aforementioned accrued interest will be forgiven if Omaha timely pays all of the above mentioned required principal payments, as defined in the amended loan agreement. Omaha is still precluded from making distributions to its investors until its unsecured loan is paid in full. Therefore, Registrant does not anticipate receiving any distributions from Omaha during the foreseeable future and has reserved 100% of the reported value of its investment in Omaha on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

Registrant owns two fully leased industrial properties in the Minneapolis Metropolitan Statistical Area (“MSA”). According to a market report by Cushman and Wakefield, the MSA’s industrial market reported lower vacancy rates due to positive absorption of vacant space. However, market rents remained flat in 2014.

 

Registrant’s property located in Lino Lakes, MN is encumbered by a $10,000,000 mortgage which matures October 5, 2015. It is unlikely Registrant will be able to refinance or extend the maturity date of the mortgage due to the short term remaining on the lease to the single tenant who currently leases 100% of the space. Registrant has engaged a broker to market the property for a sale to be completed prior to the maturity date of the mortgage. The assets and liabilities for this property for 2014 and 2013 are reflected as assets and liabilities from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the results of operations for 2014, 2013 and 2012 are reflected as income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. See note 4 to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Occupancy for the two industrial properties owned by the Registrant remained at 100% during 2014. (Please refer to Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.)

 

 
3

 

 

ITEM 1A. Risks Factors

 

This report on Form 10-K includes statements that constitute "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27(A) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21(E) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those sections. By their nature, all forward looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward looking statements for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to, those risks described below:

 

General

 

The Registrant's investments consist of direct or indirect investments in real property and as such will be subject to varying degrees of risk generally incident to the ownership of real estate assets. The underlying value of the Registrant's real estate investments and the Registrant's financial condition will be dependent upon its ability to operate its properties in a manner sufficient to maintain or increase revenues and to generate sufficient income in excess of ownership and operating expenses. Income from the properties may be adversely affected by changes in national and local economic conditions such as oversupply of industrial flex, warehouse distribution spaces or apartments in the Registrant's markets, the attractiveness of the properties to tenants, changes in interest rates and in the availability, cost and terms of mortgage financing, the ongoing need for capital improvements, particularly in older structures, changes in real estate tax rates, adverse changes in governmental rules and fiscal policies, adverse changes in zoning laws, civil unrest, acts of God, including natural disasters (which may result in uninsured losses), and other factors which are beyond the control of the Registrant. If the Registrant were unable to promptly renew the leases of a significant number of tenants, re-lease vacant spaces or, if the rental rates upon such renewal or re-letting were significantly lower than expected rates, the Registrant's results of operations, financial condition and ability to make distributions to Unit holders may be adversely affected.

 

Risks of Liability and Loss

 

The development and ownership of real estate may result in liability to third parties due to conditions existing on a property which may result in injury. In addition, real estate may suffer a loss in value due to casualties such as fire or natural disaster. Such liability or loss may be uninsurable in some circumstances, such as a loss caused by the presence of mold, or may exceed the limits of insurance maintained at typical amounts for the type and condition of the property. Real estate may also be taken, in whole or in part, by public authorities for public purposes in eminent domain proceedings. Awards resulting from such proceedings may not adequately compensate the Registrant for the value lost.

 

Value and Non-liquidity of Real Estate

 

Real estate investments are relatively non-liquid. The Registrant's ability to vary its portfolio in response to changes in economic and other conditions will therefore be limited. If the Registrant must sell an investment, there can be no assurance that it will be able to dispose of the investment in the time period it desires or that the sales price of the investment will recoup or exceed the amount of the Registrant's cost of the investment.

 

Potential Adverse Effect on Results of Operations Due to Operating Risks

 

The Registrant's properties are subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any and all of which may adversely affect occupancy or rental rates.

 

Debt Servicing and Financing

 

Many borrowers are finding it difficult to secure debt at acceptable terms as lenders have imposed stricter terms on borrowers. If the Registrant does not have funds sufficient to repay its indebtedness at maturity, the Registrant may need to refinance such indebtedness with new debt financing or through equity offerings. The Registrant may be unable to obtain a loan which will be sufficient to retire the existing loan. If it is unable to refinance this indebtedness on acceptable terms, the Registrant may be forced to dispose of properties upon disadvantageous terms, which could result in losses to the Registrant. If prevailing interest rates or general economic conditions result in higher interest rates at a time when the Registrant must refinance its indebtedness, the Registrant's interest expense could increase, which would adversely affect the Registrant's results of operations and financial condition. Further, to the extent Registrant's properties are mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and the Registrant is unable to meet the mortgage payments, mortgagee could foreclose with a consequent loss of income and asset value to the Registrant.

 

 
4

 

 

Registrant’s property located in Lino Lakes, MN is encumbered by a $10,000,000 mortgage which matures October 5, 2015. It is unlikely Registrant will be able to refinance or extend the maturity date of the mortgage due to the short term remaining on the lease to the single tenant who currently leases 100% of the space. Registrant has engaged a broker to market the property for a sale to be completed prior to the maturity date of the mortgage. Net proceeds will be used first to pay off the property mortgage and all closing costs. A portion or all of the remaining proceeds will be used to pay down the unsecured bank loan described below.

 

On April 29, 2011, the Holder (“Holder”) and Registrant executed a new Loan Agreement (“Loan Agreement”) related to Registrant’s $22,000,000 unsecured debt on the following terms:

 

 

1)

In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, Registrant was required to make an immediate payment to Holder of $11,930,430, reducing the balance due under the unsecured credit facility to $10,069,570. The payment was made from proceeds resulting from the sale of 175 Ambassador Drive. Additional proceeds from the sale were used to pay Registrant’s and Holder’s legal and appraisal costs and to fund a reserve account for future tenant improvement and leasing costs, as needed. The remaining outstanding obligation in the amount of $10,069,570 was divided into two notes (“Note A” and “Note B;” together, the “Notes”).

 

 

2)

Note A (“Note A”) with a current balance of $3,953,036 has a maturity of July 31, 2015. Registrant has one 1-year option to extend the maturity if certain conditions are satisfied. Note A requires monthly payments of interest at an annual fixed rate of 5% until paid in full. Registrant is required to make an additional fixed principal payment of $9,570 on April 1, 2015 and $30,000 monthly thereafter until paid in full.

 

 

3)

Note B (“Note B”) in the amount of $6,000,000 has a maturity date of April 29, 2018. Registrant has three 1-year options to extend the maturity date if certain conditions are satisfied. Note B accrues interest at an annual fixed rate of 5% but only until all interest and principal have been paid in full on Note A. Thereafter Note B does not accrue any interest. Payments of interest and principal are deferred until Sentinel Omaha LLC (“Omaha”) pays distributions to Registrant. Distributions from Omaha would be used first to pay accrued interest on the Note B obligation, then principal on the Note B obligation. If there are no distributions from Omaha prior to the Note B maturity, all interest and principal is due at maturity, subject to the above mentioned extensions. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, $1,113,339 and $809,167, respectively of Note B interest have been accrued and are included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet.

 

 

4)

The Notes may be voluntarily prepaid upon notice to the Holder, subject to certain requirements as to the application of payments. Registrant’s obligations under the Notes may be accelerated upon default.

 

 

5)

Until Registrant’s obligations under the Notes are satisfied in full, Registrant is required to pay a portion of its net operating income (after payment of certain permitted expenses), and the net proceeds from the sale, transfer or refinancing of its remaining properties and investments, toward the repayment of Notes while retaining the other portion to increase cash reserves. On May 28, 2014, the Partnership paid $13,973 to the Holder to pay down a portion of the outstanding balance of Note A. The proceeds represented excess net operating income, as defined, for the year ended April 30, 2014. On May 15, 2013, the Partnership paid $16,455 to the Holder to pay down a portion of the outstanding balance of Note A. The proceeds represented excess net operating income, as defined, for the year ended April 30, 2013. While the obligations under the Notes are outstanding, Registrant is precluded from making distributions to its partners.

 

 

6)

Registrant, its general partner and the Holder also entered into a Management Subordination Agreement accruing a portion of the investment management fee payable by Registrant to its general partner so long as the Notes remain outstanding. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, $1,569,691 and $1,126,703, respectively of investment management fees have been accrued and are included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet.

 

 

7)

As additional security for Registrant’s payment of its obligations under the Loan Agreement, Registrant, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Eagle IV Realty, LLC, has executed a Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Fixture Financing Statement (“Eagle IV Security Agreement”) and a Pledge Agreement (“Eagle IV Pledge Agreement”) in favor of Holder. The Eagle IV Security Agreement provides Holder with a security interest on Registrant’s property located in Maple Grove, Minnesota (“Eagle IV”) of up to $5,000,000. The Eagle IV Pledge Agreement pledges to Holder Registrant’s membership interest in Eagle IV Realty, LLC, the direct owner of Eagle IV. Registrant has no other debt obligation secured by Eagle IV. The Loan Agreement also provides for a negative pledge on Registrant’s remaining properties and investments.

 

 
5

 

 

Environmental Issues

 

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances on such property. These laws often impose environmental liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate their presence, may adversely affect the owner's or operator's ability to sell or rent the property or to borrow using the property as collateral. Persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment facility, whether or not such facility is owned or operated by such person. Certain third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of such properties or persons who arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances and, therefore, are potentially liable for removal or remediation costs, as well as certain other related costs, including governmental fines and injuries to persons and property.

 

Competition

 

The Registrant competes for tenants with many other real estate owners. The success of the Registrant in attracting tenants for its properties will depend upon its ability to maintain its properties and their attractiveness to tenants, new property developments, local conditions, and changing demographic trends. All of the Registrant's properties are located in developed areas that include other, similar properties. The number of competitive properties in a particular area could have a material effect on the Registrant's ability to lease industrial flex or warehouse distribution space at its properties and on the rents charged at such properties.

 

Tax Matters

 

There were no significant changes in the tax laws or the extent to which such legislation impacts the Registrant or the partners during the year ended December 31, 2014. Unit holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences arising under the federal law and the laws of any state, municipality or other taxing jurisdiction, including tax consequences arising from such Unit holder's own tax characteristics.

 

General

 

Efforts required in complying with federal, state and local environmental regulations may have and may continue to have an adverse effect on the Registrant's operations in the future, although such costs have not historically been significant in amount.

 

The Registrant considers itself to be engaged in only one industry segment, real estate investment, and therefore information regarding industry segments is not applicable and has not been provided.

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

 
6

 

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

The properties owned by the Registrant as of December 31, 2014 are as follows:

 

     

Description

     

 

 

   

 

         

Property

Location

 

Sq. Ft.

 

Units

 

Acres

 

Acquisition

Date

 

Percent

Ownership

   

Occupancy

at 12/31/2014

   

Mortgage

Payable

 
                                               

Industrial Flex:

                                             

Eagle Lake Business Center IV

Maple Grove, MN

    60,000  

n/a

    5.15  

Jun 02

    100 %     100 %   $ 0  

Registrant and the tenant executed an amendment to the lease to, among other items, extend the maturity of the lease to October 31, 2019. However, tenant has an ongoing option to terminate the lease after July 31, 2017 under certain conditions, including the payment of an early termination penalty, as set forth in the amended lease terms.

 

 

Warehouse Distribution Center:

                                             

435 Park Court

Lino Lakes, MN

    266,000  

n/a

    13.47  

Oct 05

    100 %     100 %   $ 10,000,000  

435 Park Court is 100% leased to a single tenant whose lease expires September 30, 2017. Tenant has two options to renew its lease for a period of five years each. During the first quarter of 2015, Registrant has engaged a broker to market 435 Park Court for an expected sale in the third quarter of 2015.

 

Investment in Sentinel Omaha LLC:

13 garden apartment properties and one high-rise apartment property 10 U.S. markets     n/a   4,044     n/a   Sept. 07     30%       91%       n/a  

 

Additional information regarding properties owned by the Registrant:

 

   

2014

   

2013

   

2012

   

2011

   

2010

 
                                         

Average Occupancy (a)

                                       
                                         

Eagle Lake Business Center IV (b)

    100.00 %     100.00 %     100.00 %     100.00 %     100.00 %

435 Park Court (c)

    100.00 %     100.00 %     100.00 %     100.00 %     100.00 %

175 Ambassador Drive (d) (f)

 

n/a

   

n/a

   

n/a

   

n/a

      100.00 %

Investment in Sentinel Omaha, LLC (e)

    91.00 %     90.00 %     90.00 %     91.00 %     92.00 %
                                         
                                         

Effective Annual Rent (a)

                                       
                                         

Eagle Lake Business Center IV (b) (g)

  $ 18     $ 15     $ 15     $ 15     $ 16  

435 Park Court (c)(g)

  $ 6     $ 6     $ 6     $ 6     $ 6  

175 Ambassador Drive (d) (f) (g)

 

n/a

   

n/a

   

n/a

   

n/a

    $ 4  

Investment in Sentinel Omaha, LLC (e) (h)

  $ 8,834     $ 8,152     $ 7,975     $ 7,707     $ 7,381  

 

(a) For period of ownership.

(b) Property was purchased June 12, 2002.

(c) Property was purchased on October 5, 2005.

(d) Property was purchased on November 28, 2006.

(e) Investment was purchased September 2007

(f) Property was sold December 3, 2010.

(g) Average per square foot per annum. Base rent plus operating expense reimbursements from tenant, divided by the total number of square feet at the property. Expense reimbursements include only expenses paid by Registrant in accordance with the terms of each lease. Reimbursements by the tenant include real estate taxes, insurance and certain operating expenses. Amounts are annualized for periods of ownership of less than one year.

(h) Average per apartment unit per annum. Gross potential rent, less concessions and vacancies, divided by the total number of apartment units at the property. Amounts are annualized for periods of ownership of less than one year.

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None

 

ITEM 4.

(Removed and Reserved).

 

 
7

 

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S UNITS OF PARTNERSHIP INTEREST AND RELATED UNITHOLDER MATTERS

 

The transfer of Units or Participations (equivalent to one-half Unit) is subject to certain limitations, including the consent of the General Partner. There is no public market for the Units and it is not anticipated that any such public market will develop. The number of Unit holders as of December 31, 2014 was 2,523.

 

At various times, the Registrant has generated and distributed cash to the Unit holders. Registrant did not declare a distribution for 2014, 2013 or 2012. Cumulative distributions since inception have totaled $111,747,950. However, there is no requirement to make such distributions nor can there be any assurance that future operations will generate cash available for distribution. In addition, while the obligations under the Loan Agreement are outstanding, Registrant is precluded from making distributions to its partners.

 

 
8

 

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

The following table sets forth selected financial data regarding the Registrant's financial condition and results of operations determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. This data should be read in conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.

 

   

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
   

2014

   

2013

   

2012

   

2011

   

2010

 
           

(In Thousands, Except Unit Data)

 
                                         

Income Statement Data:

                                       

Rental, Interest and Other Revenues

  $ 1,087     $ 896     $ 880     $ 920     $ 960  

Operating Expenses, Less Depreciation and Amortization

    (2,002 )     (1,983 )     (1,969 )     (1,953 )     (2,049 )

Depreciation and Amortization

    (167 )     (190 )     (195 )     (177 )     (138 )
                                         

Loss from Operations

    (1,082 )     (1,277 )     (1,284 )     (1,210 )     (1,227 )

Equity in Net Income (Loss) of Investment

    5,081       1,669       (3,346 )     (763 )     (416 )

Reserve for Value of Investment

    (5,081 )     (1,669 )     3,346       763       416  
                                         

(Loss) from Continuing Operations

    (1,082 )     (1,277 )     (1,284 )     (1,210 )     (1,227 )
                                         

Income from Discontinued Operations

    207       174       179       182       650  

(Loss) on Sale of Investments in Real Estate

    -       -       -       -       (46 )
                                         

Net (Loss)

  $ (875 )   $ (1,103 )   $ (1,105 )   $ (1,028 )   $ (623 )
                                         

(Loss) from Continuing Operations per Unit of Partnership Interest:

  $ (140 )   $ (165 )   $ (166 )   $ (156 )   $ (158 )
                                         

Income from Dicontinued Operations per Unit of Partnership Interest:

  $ 27     $ 22     $ 23     $ 23     $ 84  
                                         

Distributions paid per Unit of Partnership Interest

  $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
                                         

Weighted Average Number of Partnership Units Outstanding

    7,754       7,754       7,754       7,754       7,754  
                                         

Balance Sheet Data at Year End:

                                       
                                         

Real Estate, net

  $ 3,706     $ 3,833     $ 3,902     $ 4,043     $ 4,184  

Real Estate Assets Held for Sale

  $ 12,026     $ 12,379     $ 12,733     $ 13,086     $ 13,418  

Other Assets in Discontinued Operations

  $ 23     $ 22     $ 24     $ 26     $ 11  

Total Assets

  $ 17,272     $ 17,482     $ 17,740     $ 18,202     $ 30,603  

Mortgage Note and Unsecured Loan Payable

  $ 9,953     $ 9,967     $ 9,983     $ 10,070     $ 22,000  

Mortgage Note in Discontinued Operations

  $ 10,000     $ 10,000     $ 10,000     $ 10,000     $ 10,000  

Other Liabilities in Discontinued Operations

  $ 25     $ 25     $ 25     $ 25     $ 25  

Partners' Deficit

  $ (5,775 )   $ (4,900 )   $ (3,797 )   $ (2,691 )   $ (1,663 )

 

 
9

 

 

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

COMPANY OVERVIEW

 

The Registrant is a New York limited partnership formed to engage in acquiring, operating and holding for investment a varying portfolio of real estate interests. The Registrant's initial public offering was in 1971, the year it began operations. As of December 31, 2014, the Registrant owned an industrial flex property in Maple Grove, Minnesota, and a warehouse distribution center in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. The Registrant also has a thirty percent interest in Sentinel Omaha, LLC. Omaha is a real estate investment company which as of December 31, 2014 owns 14 multifamily properties in 10 markets. Omaha is an affiliate of the Registrant’s general partner.

 

The principal objectives of the Registrant are, first, to obtain capital appreciation through equity investments in real estate; second, to generate cash available for distribution, a portion of which may not be currently taxable; and third, to the extent still permitted under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to generate tax losses which may offset the limited partners' income from the Registrant and certain other sources.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

 

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. The summary should be read in conjunction with the more complete discussion of significant accounting policies included in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

Real Estate

 

Real estate is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation requires an estimate by management of the useful life of each property as well as an allocation of the costs associated with a property to its various components. If Registrant does not allocate these costs appropriately or incorrectly estimates the useful lives of its real estate, depreciation expense may be misstated.

 

Registrant’s wholly owned property located in Lino Lakes, Minnesota is 100% leased to a single tenant until September 30, 2017. The tenant’s base rent is fixed and there are no increases scheduled through the initial lease term. The tenant has two options to renew its lease for five years each at a yet undetermined market rate, although there is no assurance the tenant will renew. Tenant either pays directly or reimburses Registrant for all utilities, real estate taxes, insurance and most of the property operating expenses and property management fees. Registrant’s property located in Lino Lakes, MN is encumbered by a $10,000,000 mortgage which matures October 5, 2015. It is unlikely Registrant will be able to refinance or extend the maturity date of the mortgage due to the short term remaining on the lease to the single tenant who currently leases 100% of the space. Registrant has engaged a broker to market the property for a sale to be completed prior to the maturity date of the mortgage. Net proceeds will be used first to pay off the property mortgage and all closing costs. A portion or all of the remaining proceeds will be used to pay down the Notes to the Holder. The assets and liabilities for this property for 2014 and 2013 are reflected as assets and liabilities from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the results of operations for 2014, 2013 and 2012 are reflected as income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. See note 4 to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Registrant’s wholly owned property located in Maple Grove, Minnesota is 100% leased to a single tenant until July 31, 2015. On February 12, 2015, Registrant and the tenant executed an extension of the lease to October 31, 2019. However, tenant has on ongoing option to terminate the lease after July 31, 2017 under certain conditions as set forth in the lease terms as amended. One of the conditions is the payment of an early termination penalty the calculation of which is based on the remaining time period in the lease. Another condition is the tenant must provide notice twelve months prior to the termination. The tenant pays fixed base rent which increases approximately 3% each year. The tenant pays directly or reimburses Registrant for all utilities, real estate taxes, insurance and most of the property operating expenses and property management fees. Sentinel Omaha LLC’s portfolio consists of 13 garden apartment properties and one high rise apartment property. Leases are generally one year or less. Tenants generally pay fixed rent plus utilities used by tenant.

 

 
10

 

 

Registrant's properties are regularly evaluated on a property-by-property basis for impairment. Impairment is determined by calculating the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows including the projected undiscounted future net proceeds from the sale of the property. In the event such sum is less than the net carrying value of the property, the property will be written down to estimated fair value. If the Partnership incorrectly estimates the value of the asset or the undiscounted cash flows, the impairment charges may be different from those, if any, in the consolidated financial statements.

 

Investment in Sentinel Omaha, LLC

 

The Registrant has a 30% non-controlling interest in Omaha that is accounted for at fair value. Due to the mortgage crisis, stagnant real estate market and slow economy, Omaha reported a decrease in the value of its portfolio of approximately $116,552,000 (-24.5%) during 2008 to 2013. During 2014, Omaha reported an increase in the value of its portfolio of $15,700,000 (5.9%) however the increase is small compared to the aggregate losses reported in the prior years. The total real estate portfolio value of $283,300,000 as of December 31, 2014 consists of the same properties which made up Omaha’s portfolio as of December 31, 2013. During 2013, Omaha sold its properties located in Phoenix, AZ, Ocala, FL, Jacksonville, NC and one of its properties located in Daytona, FL. Omaha used the proceeds from the sales to pay down its loan obligations. On September 30, 2013, Omaha executed an amendment and restatement of its unsecured loan to December 31, 2017. The amendment and restatement, among other items, requires Omaha to make specific periodic principal payments on the unsecured loan at scheduled dates through December 31, 2017. It has also reduced the pay rate on a portion of the unsecured loan to a floating rate of 200 basis points over LIBOR while increasing the additional accrual rate on the same portion of the unsecured loan to 500 basis points over LIBOR. However, the aforementioned accrued interest will be forgiven if Omaha timely pays the above mentioned required principal payments, as defined in the amended loan agreement. During 2013 and 2014, Omaha paid $3,000,000 and $6,500,000, respectively to the holder of the unsecured loan in accordance with the amendment and restatement agreement. However, Omaha is still precluded from making distributions to its investors until its unsecured loan is paid in full. As a result of the aforementioned, Registrant does not anticipate receiving any distributions from Omaha during the foreseeable future and has reserved 100% of the reported value of its investment in Omaha on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

For the year 2014, Omaha reported net investment income of $10,028,642 of which the Registrant’s interest was $3,008,593. In addition, Registrant’s interest in the net unrealized appreciation of real estate properties, mortgages, and interest rate protection agreements was $2,072,009 for 2014.

 

During 2013, Omaha reported net income of $6,742,317 of which Registrant’s share was $2,022,695. However, for 2013, Registrant’s share of the net income from Omaha was reduced for the unrecognized loss from 2012 of $353,743. For the year 2013, the Registrant’s interest in the net investment income and realized loss from the sale of property of Omaha was $1,776,592 and ($7,761,115), respectively. In addition, Registrant’s interest in the net unrealized appreciation of real estate properties, mortgages, and interest rate protection agreements was $8,007,218 for 2013.

 

For the year 2012, the Registrant’s interest in the net investment income and realized loss from the sale of property of Omaha was $1,489,869 and ($1,371,927), respectively. In addition, Registrant’s interest in the net unrealized depreciation of real estate properties, mortgages, and interest rate protection agreements was ($3,818,130) for 2012. Omaha reported a negative equity balance as of December 31, 2012 due to the additional loss in value of its real estate properties during 2012. For 2012, Registrant’s share of the net loss from Omaha exceeded Registrant’s remaining unreserved equity investment as of December 31, 2011. Registrant recorded the loss for 2012 only to the extent the unreserved equity investment was reduced to zero.

 

Determination of the fair value of Omaha involves numerous estimates and subjective judgments that are subject to change in response to current and future economic and market conditions, including, among other things, demand for residential apartments, competition, and operating cost levels such as labor, energy costs, real estate taxes and market interest rates. Judgments regarding these factors are not subject to precise quantification or verification and may change from time to time as economic and market factors change.

 

 
11

 

 

Estimated fair value is based on the criteria outlined in Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Codification No. 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820-10).  ASC 820-10 established a "three-tier" valuation hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions used in valuation techniques to measure fair value.  The three levels of fair value hierarchy under ASC 820-10 are described below:

 

    Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities;

 

    Level 2 - Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities or quoted prices in less active dealer or broker markets;

 

    Level 3 - Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and are unobservable.

 

Estimated fair value calculations were prepared by Omaha's management utilizing Level 3 inputs.

 

Further, the investment in Omaha is not consolidated because other investors have substantive ownership and participative rights regarding Omaha’s operations and therefore control does not vest in the Registrant. Were the Registrant deemed to control Omaha, it would have to be consolidated and therefore would impact the financial statements and related ratios.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Rental income is recognized when earned pursuant to the terms of the leases. Base rents and reimbursement of the tenants' share of certain operating expenses are generally recognized when due from tenants. Before Registrant can recognize revenue, it is required to assess, among other things, its collectability. Registrant continually analyzes the collectability of its revenue and will reserve against its revenue if conditions warrant such action.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

None.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

The Registrant’s general partner does not believe that any recently adopted accounting pronouncements by the Financial Accounting Standards Board will have a material impact on the Registrant’s current or future consolidated financial statements.

 

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

 

As of December 31, 2014, the Registrant’s contractual obligations consisted of a mortgage note and an unsecured loan payable. Principal payments under the mortgage note and unsecured loan payable are due as follows:

 

For the year ending December 31,

       

2015

    13,953,036  

2016

    -  

2017

    -  

2018

    6,000,000  

2019

    -  

Thereafter

    -  
         

Total

  $ 19,953,036  

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

As of December 31, 2014, Registrant had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $933,000 as compared to approximately $624,000 as of December 31, 2013. Cash and cash equivalents increased due to cash generated from operating activities at Registrant’s two wholly owned properties partially offset by partnership operating costs paid and a partial pay down of the Note A due to the Holder.

 

Currently, Registrant’s only source of cash is rental income received from the two tenants each of whom lease 100% of the Registrant’s two wholly owned properties. The tenants either pay directly or reimburse Registrant for the real estate taxes, insurance and most of the properties’ operating expenses leaving a significant portion of the base rent received available to pay property debt service, current debt service on Registrant’s Note A, capital improvements and partnership administrative expenses. A portion of any remaining annual cash flow is used to pay down the principal balance of Note A in accordance with the Loan Agreement while the remainder cash income is retained by Registrant as cash reserves. As part of Registrant and the Holder restructuring the unsecured debt in 2011, Registrant set aside $500,000 in escrow to be held and used only to pay the costs to release the space at either of Registrant’s wholly owned properties.

 

 
12

 

 

Total outstanding debt at December 31, 2014 consisted of a $10,000,000 non-recourse first mortgage note secured by real estate owned by the Registrant due in October 2015 and $9,953,036 under the new Loan Agreement.

 

Registrant’s property located in Lino Lakes, MN is encumbered by a $10,000,000 mortgage which matures October 5, 2015. It is unlikely Registrant will be able to refinance or extend the maturity date of the mortgage due to the remaining short term of the single tenant who currently leases 100% of the space. Registrant has engaged a broker to market the property for a sale to be completed prior to the maturity date of the mortgage. Net proceeds will be used first to pay off the property mortgage and all closing costs. A portion or all of the remaining proceeds will be used to pay down the unsecured bank loan described below.

 

On April 29, 2011, the Holder and Registrant executed a new Loan Agreement. The new loan agreement consists of Note A in the current amount of $3,953,036 which matures July 2015 and Note B in the amount of $6,000,000 which matures April 2018. Registrant has one 1-year option to extend the maturity of Note A as long as a) both wholly owned properties are 100% leased to the current tenants and b) Registrant is not in default of its obligations under the terms of the Notes. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 1A. Debt Servicing and Financing. Many borrowers are still finding it difficult to secure debt at acceptable terms as lenders have imposed stricter terms on borrowers. If the Registrant does not have funds sufficient to repay its indebtedness at maturity, the Registrant may need to refinance such indebtedness with new debt financing or through equity offerings. The Registrant may be restricted from obtaining a loan which will be sufficient to retire the existing loan and which may be based on lower debt service coverage. If it is unable to refinance this indebtedness on acceptable terms, the Registrant may be forced to dispose of properties upon disadvantageous terms, which could result in losses to the Registrant and adversely affect the amount of cash reserves. If prevailing interest rates or general economic conditions result in higher interest rates at a time when the Registrant must refinance its indebtedness, the Registrant's interest expense could increase, which would adversely affect the Registrant's results of operations and financial condition. Further, to the extent the Registrant's properties are mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and the Registrant is unable to meet the mortgage payments, mortgagee could foreclose or otherwise transfer the property, with a consequent loss of income and asset value to the Registrant. The Registrant has no other debt except normal trade accounts payable, accrued interest on mortgage notes payable and accrued investment management fees.

 

Inflation and changing prices during the current period did not significantly affect the markets in which the Registrant conducts its business, or the Registrant’s business overall.

 

Omaha reports on a fair value basis and for 2014, Omaha reported an increase in the value of its portfolio of $15,700,000 (5.9%) over 2013. The total real estate portfolio value of $283,300,000 as of December 31, 2014 consists of the same properties which made up Omaha’s portfolio as of December 31, 2013. Although the two remaining commercial properties owned by the Registrant are 100% occupied, the aforementioned economic slowdown had increased the risk that one or both tenants could default on their lease. The national industrial market improved in 2013 and 2014, however, Registrant may still require a longer time period to replace one of the tenants at its properties should a default occur or should either or both of the tenants not renew their leases at the end of the lease term.

 

Registrant did not pay a distribution in 2014. There is no requirement to make such distributions, nor can there be any assurance that future operations will generate cash available for distribution. While the obligations under the new Loan Agreement are outstanding, Registrant is precluded from making distributions to its Unit holders.

 

Registrant anticipates that the sale of the property located in Lino Lakes will generate sufficient proceeds to pay off the existing mortgage and sales costs. In addition, the sale may generate excess proceeds after the payoff of the property mortgage to pay down a portion or all of Note A due to Holder. If Note A is paid off completely, Registrant will be no longer be obligated to pay monthly cash debt service related to Note A. Note B does not require payments until maturity. If Note A is completely paid off from the net sales proceeds from the sale of the property located in Lino Lakes, Registrant anticipates cash flow generated from the property located in Maple Grove and cash reserves will be sufficient to cover operating and capital improvement costs, and other working capital requirements of the Registrant for the foreseeable future. If the sale of the Lino Lakes property does not generate sufficient proceeds to pay off Note A completely, Registrant will have to use cash reserves to pay current debt service on the remaining balance of Note A. Note A due to the Holder, which has a current outstanding balance of $3,953,036, will mature in 2016 after exercise of the one remaining 1-year extension.  If the sale of the Lino Lakes property does not generate sufficient proceeds to pay off Note A completely, there is no assurance that Registrant will be able to extend or refinance Note A on acceptable terms.  If the Registrant does not have funds sufficient to repay its indebtedness at maturity, the Registrant may need to refinance such indebtedness with new debt financing or through equity offerings.  The Registrant may be unable to obtain a loan which will be sufficient to retire the existing loan. If it is unable to refinance this indebtedness on acceptable terms, the Registrant may be forced to dispose of properties upon disadvantageous terms, which could result in losses to the Registrant.  If prevailing interest rates or general economic conditions result in higher interest rates at a time when the Registrant seeks to refinance its indebtedness, the Registrant's interest expense could increase, which would adversely affect the Registrant's results of operations and financial condition. Further, to the extent Registrant's properties are mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and the Registrant is unable to meet the mortgage payments, mortgagee could foreclose with a consequent loss of income and asset value to the Registrant.

 

 
13

 

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 2014 VS. 2013

 

Total revenues from continuing operations increased 191,000 to approximately $1,087,000 in 2014 from approximately $896,000 in 2013 due to higher rental income, other income and interest income on short term investments. Rental income increased due to a scheduled increase in base rent for the tenant at Eagle Lake IV. Real estate tax and operating expense reimbursements from Eagle Lake IV were higher in 2014 due to the final determination of prior year operating costs charged to the tenant in 2014. The increase in interest income is due to higher cash funds available for short term investment during 2014.

 

The Registrant reported a net loss from continuing operations of approximately $1,083,000 in 2014, an improvement of $195,000 as compared to a net loss from continuing operations of approximately $1,278,000 in 2013. Net loss from continuing operations consists of net income from the Maple Grove property combined with partnership income and expenses. The decrease of loss from continuing operations was due to higher total revenues combined with lower total expenses. Total expenses from continuing operations for 2014 decreased $4,000 to approximately $2,170,000 from approximately $2,174,000 in 2013, due to decreases in depreciation and amortization costs of $23,000 and a decrease in real estate operating expenses of $12,000. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of management fees of $12,000 and partnership expenses of $11,000.

 

Registrant’s equity interest in the net investment income of Omaha was approximately $5,081,000 for 2014.  Under the terms of the unsecured loan extension Omaha signed effective July 1, 2009, as extended and modified, Omaha is precluded from making distributions to its investors until its unsecured loan is paid. As a result of the aforementioned, Registrant does not anticipate receiving any distributions from Omaha during the foreseeable future and has reserved 100% of the reported value of its investment in Omaha on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. Equity in net income of investment increased $3,058,000 to an income of approximately $5,081,000 for 2014 compared to income of approximately $2,023,000 for 2013. Omaha reports on a fair value basis and due to the mortgage crisis, stagnant real estate market and slow economy, Omaha reported a significant write-down in the value of its real estate portfolio of approximately $116,552,000 (-24.5%) during 2008 to 2013. During 2014, Omaha reported an increase in the value of its portfolio of $15,700,000 (5.9%) however the increase is small compared to the aggregate losses reported in the prior years.

 

Registrant has engaged a broker to market the property located in Lino Lakes, MN. for a sale anticipated to be completed during the third quarter of 2015. The assets and liabilities for this property for 2014 and 2013 are reflected as assets and liabilities from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the results of operations for 2014, 2013 and 2012 are reflected as income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. See note 4 to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

For additional analysis, please refer to the discussions of the individual properties below.

 

Eagle Lake Business Center IV (Maple Grove, Minnesota)

 

Total revenues increased $191,000, to approximately $1,087,000 in 2014 compared with approximately $896,000 in 2013. Net income, which includes deductions for depreciation, increased $200,000 to approximately $647,000 in 2014 from approximately $447,000 in 2013. The property has been 100% leased and occupied by the same single tenant for both years. The increase in total revenue was due to higher scheduled rent collected from the tenant combined with an increase in expense reimbursements collected from the tenant. Operating expense reimbursements were higher in 2014 due to higher tenant charges for operating costs incurred in the prior years being finalized and charged to the tenant in 2014. The increase in net income was due to the increase in revenues combined with a decrease in operating expenses. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily due to decreases in utilities of $10,000 and depreciation expense of $9,000.

 

 
14

 

 

The Minneapolis-St. Paul industrial market reported lower vacancy rates in 2014 due to positive absorption of vacant space. However, market rents remained flat in 2014.

 

435 Park Court (Lino Lakes, Minnesota)

 

Total revenues increased $9,000, to approximately $1,622,000 in 2014 compared with approximately $1,613,000 in 2013 due to higher rental income partially offset by lower expense reimbursements. Income from discontinued operations, which includes deductions for depreciation and mortgage interest expense, increased $33,000 to approximately $207,000 in 2014 from approximately $174,000 in 2013. The property has been 100% leased and occupied by the same single tenant for both years. The increase in rental income was due to a scheduled increase in the tenant’s base rent. The decrease in expense reimbursements was primarily due to lower real estate tax reimbursements. The increase in net income was primarily due to a decrease in operating expenses combined with an increase in revenues. Real estate tax expense decreased by approximately $23,000 in 2014 while real estate operating expenses decreased by approximately $1,000.

 

The Minneapolis-St. Paul industrial market reported lower vacancy rates due to positive absorption of vacant space. However, market rents remained flat in 2014.

 

Investments

 

During 2007, the Registrant made a total investment in the amount of $37,200,000 in Omaha representing a thirty percent ownership interest. The Registrant’s investment in Omaha is accounted for at fair value.

 

On September 18, 2007, Omaha acquired all the outstanding common shares of America First Apartment Investors, Inc., a publicly held real estate investment trust, in a transaction valued at approximately $532 million, including the assumption of outstanding debt and excluding transactions costs. Omaha consisted of 31 wholly owned multifamily residential properties, a wholly owned commercial property and a wholly owned multifamily property that was under development. During 2014, Omaha did not purchase or sell any properties in its portfolio. During 2013 Omaha sold its multifamily property in Phoenix, Arizona, its multifamily property in Ocala, Florida, its multifamily property in Jacksonville, North Carolina and one of its multifamily properties in Daytona, Florida to further its continuing goal of reducing the level of its debt obligations.

 

Total revenues for 2014 were approximately $39,125,000. Net investment income before net unrealized depreciation and appreciation was $10,029,000. Major expenses included $9,538,000 of interest expense, $3,549,000 for repairs and maintenance, $5,264,000 for payroll and $3,649,000 for real estate taxes. In addition, Omaha reported a net unrealized appreciation on the valuation of the remaining real estate assets, related mortgages, and interest rate protection agreements of $6,907,000. For the year 2014, the Registrant’s equity interest in the income of Omaha was approximately $5,081,000.

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 2013 VS. 2012

 

Total revenues from continuing operations increased 16,000 to approximately $896,000 in 2013 from approximately $880,000 in 2012 due to higher rental income and interest income on short term investments partially offset by lower expense reimbursements. Rental income increased due to a scheduled increase in base rent for the tenant at Eagle Lake IV. The increase in interest income is due to higher cash funds available for short term investment during 2013. Operating expense reimbursements were lower in 2013 due to lower tenant charges for operating expenses incurred in 2013.

 

The Registrant reported a net loss from continuing operations of approximately $1,278,000 in 2013, a slight improvement of $6,000 as compared to a net loss from continuing operations of approximately $1,284,000 in 2012. Net loss from continuing operations consists of net income from the Maple Grove property combined with partnership income and expenses.

 

The decrease from continuing operations was due to higher total revenues partially offset by higher total expenses. Total expenses from continuing operations for 2013 increased $10,000 to approximately $2,174,000 from approximately $2,164,000 in 2012, due to increases in real estate taxes of $4,000, increases in repairs and maintenance of $40,000 and utilities of $17,000. Repairs and maintenance expense increased at Eagle Lake IV due to higher snow removal costs and repairs to the parking lot. Utilities expense increased at Eagle Lake IV due to higher water and sewer costs. The increase in total expenses was partially offset by decreases in other partnership expenses, depreciation and amortization and interest expense.

 

 
15

 

 

Registrant’s equity interest in the net income of Omaha was approximately $2,023,000 for 2013.  During 2012, Registrant recorded its share of the net loss reported by Omaha but only to the extent that the investment was reduced to zero.  During 2013, Registrant reduced the net income reported by Omaha by the amount of the unrecorded loss from 2012 of $353,743 to a net income reported of approximately $1,669,000.

 

For additional analysis, please refer to the discussions of the individual properties below.

 

Eagle Lake Business Center IV (Maple Grove, Minnesota)

 

Total revenues increased $16,000, to approximately $896,000 in 2013 compared with approximately $880,000 in 2012. Net income, which includes deductions for depreciation, decreased $41,000, to approximately $439,000 in 2013 from approximately $480,000 in 2012. The property has been 100% leased and occupied by the same single tenant for both years. The increase in total revenue was due to higher scheduled rent collected from the tenant partially offset by a decrease in expense reimbursements collected from the tenant. The decrease in net income was due to the increase in operating expenses partially offset by an increase in revenues. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to increases in repairs costs of $40,000 and utilities of $17,000.

 

The Minneapolis-St. Paul industrial market reported a vacancy rate for the 3rd quarter of 2013 of 10.8% which is lower than the 13.5% reported for the 3rd quarter of 2012 according to a research report by Cushman and Wakefield. Space absorption in the Minneapolis-St. Paul industrial market was lower for the 12 months ended September 2013 at 1,238,000 square feet vs. 1,693,000 for the 12 months ended September 2012. Rental rates decreased slightly to an average of $4.33 per square foot per annum vs. $4.40 for 2012.

 

435 Park Court (Lino Lakes, Minnesota)

 

Total revenues increased $23,000, to approximately $1,613,000 in 2013 compared with approximately $1,590,000 in 2012 due to higher expense reimbursements. Income from discontinued operations, which includes deductions for depreciation and mortgage interest expense, decreased $4,000, to approximately $174,000 in 2013 from approximately $178,000 in 2012. The property has been 100% leased and occupied by the same single tenant for both years. The decrease in net income was primarily due to an increase in operating expenses partially offset by an increase in revenues. Real estate tax expense increased by approximately $23,000 in 2013 while real estate operating expenses increased by approximately $4,000.

 

The Minneapolis-St. Paul industrial market reported a vacancy rate for the 3rd quarter of 2013 of 10.8% which is lower than the 13.5% reported for the 3rd quarter of 2012 according to a research report by Cushman and Wakefield. Space absorption in the Minneapolis-St. Paul industrial market was lower for the 12 months ended September 2013 at 1,238,000 square feet vs. 1,693,000 for the 12 months ended September 2012. Rental rates decreased slightly to an average of $4.33 per square foot per annum vs. $4.40 for 2012.

 

Investments

 

During 2007, the Registrant made a total investment in the amount of $37,200,000 in Omaha representing a thirty percent ownership interest. The Registrant’s investment in Omaha is accounted for at fair value.

 

Total revenues for 2013 were approximately $39,179,000. Net investment income before net unrealized

depreciation and appreciation, and realized gains and losses was $5,922,000. Major expenses included $12,261,000 of interest expense, $3,729,000 for repairs and maintenance, $5,461,000 for payroll and $4,259,000 for real estate taxes. In addition, Omaha reported a realized loss on the sale of four multifamily properties and the satisfaction of their related mortgages of $25,871,000 and net unrealized appreciation on the valuation of the remaining real estate assets, related mortgages, and interest rate protection agreements of $26,691,000. For the year 2013, the Registrant’s equity interest in the income of Omaha was approximately $2,023,000.

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

NONE

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The Financial Statements required by this item, together with the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon, are contained herein on pages 23 through 34 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Supplementary financial information required by this item is contained herein on pages 35 through 36 of this report.

 

 
16

 

 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None

 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

(a)

The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the general partner of Registrant have evaluated the disclosure controls and procedures relating to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and have judged such controls and procedures to be effective.

 

(b)

There have been no changes in the Registrant’s internal controls during the year ended December 31, 2014 that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to the date of evaluation.

 

(c)

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Registrant’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Our evaluation of internal control over financial reporting includes using the COSO framework, an integrated framework for the evaluation of internal controls issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, to identify the risks and control objectives related to the evaluation of our control environment.

 

Based on our evaluation under the frameworks described above, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014.

 

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit Registrant to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

 

NONE

 

 
17

 

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

 

The Registrant has no executive officers or directors. All of its business affairs are handled by its General Partner, SB Partners Real Estate Corporation (the "General Partner").

 

The directors and executive officers of the General Partner are elected by Sentinel Holdings Corporation ("SHC") as its sole shareholder to serve until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The limited partners of the Registrant are not entitled to vote in their election.

 

The directors and executive officers of the General Partner who are active in the Registrant's operations are:

 

 

Name

Age

Position

     

John H. Streicker

72

Director

     

Millie C. Cassidy

69

President & Director

     

David Weiner

79

Chief Executive Officer & Director

     

Martin Cawley

58

Vice President

     

Leland J. Roth

51

Treasurer

     

John H. Zoeller

55

Chief Financial Officer

 

Mr. Streicker joined the General Partner in May 1976. He has been a Director since April 1984. He is Chairman of SHC and its parent company, The Sentinel Corporation.

 

Ms. Cassidy joined the General Partner in August 1982. She has been a Director of the General Partner since March 1988. She is President of SHC and its parent company, The Sentinel Corporation.

 

Mr. Weiner joined the General Partner in April 1984. He has been a Director of the General Partner since March 1988. He is Vice Chairman of SHC and its parent company, The Sentinel Corporation.

 

Mr. Cawley joined the General Partner in 1994. He is the regional manager responsible for commercial property transactions and management.

 

Mr. Roth joined the General Partner in 1994 and serves as its treasurer. He is a certified public accountant with over 29 years of real estate related financial, accounting and reporting experience.

 

Mr. Zoeller joined the General Partner in 1994 and serves as its principal financial and accounting officer. He is a certified public accountant with over 33 years of real estate related financial, accounting and reporting experience.

 

 
18

 

 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The Registrant has no executive officers or directors.

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

(a)

At December 31, 2014, an institutional investor of record owned 7.13% of the outstanding Units of Limited Partnership Interests. On January 13, 1993, a group of Unit holders of record, including the institutional investor referred to above, entered into a collective agreement with respect to their ownership interest in the Registrant. The aggregate number of Units beneficially owned by the group is 606 Units, representing 7.8% of the total number of outstanding Units of Limited Partnership Interest on that date. Each Unit holder has disclaimed beneficial ownership of all Units owned by the other Unit holders in this group. The foregoing information is based upon a 13-D filing made by the respective Unit holders.

 

(b)

As of December 31, 2014, none of the Directors of the General Partner owned any outstanding Units of Limited Partnership Interest. No Officers or Directors of SHC owned any outstanding Units of Limited Partnership Interest. SRE Clearing Services, Inc., an affiliate of the General Partner, owned 3,039.5 Units of Limited Partnership Interest, representing 39.20% of the outstanding number of Units on December 31, 2014. In accordance with SEC regulations, SRE Clearing Services, Inc. filed Form 13-D/A on August 21, 2014, when the total number of Units held reached 39% of the outstanding number of Units.

 

(c)

During the year ended December 31, 2014, there were no changes in control of the Registrant or the General Partner.

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

The General Partner, among other things, furnishes services and advice to the Registrant and is paid a variable annual fee for such services based on calculations prescribed in the Registrant's Partnership Agreement. For these services, the General Partner receives a management fee equal to 2% of the average amount of capital invested in real estate plus cumulative mortgage amortization payments, and 0.5% of capital not invested in real estate, as defined in the partnership agreement. The management fee amounted to $869,228, $857,041 and $858,926 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. Of the amounts earned in 2014, 2013 and 2012, $442,988, $430,618 and $437,293, respectively have been deferred while the obligations under the Loan Agreement are outstanding. The deferred amounts are included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. In addition, the General Partner is entitled to 25% of cash distributions in excess of the annual distribution preference, as defined in the partnership agreement. No such amounts were due for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 or 2012.

 

Certain affiliates of the General Partner oversee the management and operations of various real estate properties, including those owned by the Registrant. Services performed by these affiliates applicable to the Registrant's properties are billed at actual or allocated cost, or percentage of revenues. The costs of such services are believed to be competitive with charges for similar services provided by unrelated management companies. Fees charged by these affiliates totaled $131,120, $128,139 and $129,919 in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

 

In November 2012 an affiliate of the General Partner commenced maintaining and updating the investor database and preparing the tax K-1 forms and related schedules which previously had been prepared by an unaffiliated company. The fee charged by the affiliate for the similar service is lower than the fee previously charged by the unaffiliated company. Fees charged for 2014, 2013 and a part of 2012 were $54,000, $54,000 and $9,000, respectively.

 

In 2007 the Registrant made an investment of $37,200,000, representing a thirty percent ownership interest in Omaha. For the years 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Registrant’s equity interest in the net income (loss) of Omaha was approximately $5,081,000, $2,023,000 and ($3,700,000), respectively.

 

In connection with the mortgage financing of certain properties, the respective lenders required the Registrant to place the assets and liabilities of these properties into single asset limited partnerships or land trusts which hold title to these properties. A trust company affiliated with the General Partner holds the general partner interest in each single asset limited partnership as trustee for the Registrant. An affiliate of the General Partner is also the trustee of the land trust. For its services, the affiliate was not paid an annual fee in 2014, 2013 or 2012.

 

Reference is made to Items 10 and 11, and Notes 2, 5 and 9 in the consolidated financial statements.

 

 
19

 

 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

1.

Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the Registrant’s annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the Partnership’s Form 10-Q or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years were approximately $115,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

2.

Audit-Related Fees. No fees were billed by the principal accountant during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Registrant's financial statements that are not reported under subparagraph (1) of this section.

 

3.

Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were approximately $15,000 for each for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. This work included reviewing year-end tax projections as well as the Registrant’s tax returns prepared by the Registrant for the respective years.

 

4.

All Other Fees. No other fees were billed in either of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in subparagraphs (1) through (3) of this section.

   
5. (i)The selection of the independent auditors to audit the annual financial statements and perform review procedures on the quarterly reports filed with the SEC by the Registrant is made by the general partner of Registrant. Fees quoted by the independent auditors are approved by the general partner prior to their acceptance by the Registrant.
   
  (ii) Not Applicable.
   
6. Not Applicable.

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

(a)

(1)

Financial statements - The Registrant's 2014 Annual Audited Consolidated Financial Statements are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     
  (2) Financial statement schedules - See Index to Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules on page 22. All other financial statement schedules are inapplicable or the required subject matter is contained in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

 

(b)  Exhibits -

Exhibit

No. Description  

3.1

Agreement of Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to Registration Statement on form S-11 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 1985)

31.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

99.1

Audited Financial Statements of Sentinel Omaha, LLC December 31, 2014

 

101.INS ** XBRL Instance

101.SCH ** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL ** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

101.DEF ** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

101.LAB ** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels

101.PRE ** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

 

**XBRL information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.21

 

 
20

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

   

SB PARTNERS

     
 

By:

SB PARTNERS REAL ESTATE CORPORATION

   

General Partner

     
   

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 21, 2015

By:

/s/ David Weiner

   

David Weiner

     
   

Principal Financial & Accounting Officer

Dated: April 21, 2015

By:

/s/ John H. Zoeller

   

John H. Zoeller

   

Chief Financial Officer

     

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

               

Signature

   

Position

     

Date

               

/s/ David Weiner

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

   

April 21, 2015

David Weiner

           
           
     

Chief Financial Officer

   

/s/ John H. Zoeller

   

(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)

 

April 21, 2015

John H. Zoeller

           

 

 
21

 

 

SB PARTNERS

   

ITEMS 8 and 14 (a) (1) and (2)

   
   

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

   

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND

SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

   
   

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

23

   

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013

24

   

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

25

   

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

26

   

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

27

   

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

28 – 34

   

Supplemental Financial Statement schedule:

 
   

Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2014

35-36

 

 
22

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Partners

SB Partners

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SB Partners and subsidiaries (collectively, the “Partnership”) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners’ (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s general partner. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the general partner, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

In connection with our audit of the financial statements referred to above, we audited the supplemental financial statement schedule listed in the foregoing table of contents. In our opinion, the supplemental financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information stated therein, when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.

 

 

/s/ Dworken, Hillman, LaMorte and Sterczala, P.C.

Shelton, Connecticut

April 15, 2015

 

 
23

 

 

SB PARTNERS

(A New York Limited Partnership)

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

   

December 31,

 
   

2014

   

2013

 
                 

Assets:

               
Investments -                

Real estate, at cost

               

Land

  $ 470,000     $ 470,000  

Buildings, furnishings and improvements

    4,866,973       4,866,973  

Less - accumulated depreciation

    (1,631,056 )     (1,504,373 )
      3,705,917       3,832,600  
                 

Real estate held for sale

    12,026,246       12,379,457  

Investment in Sentinel Omaha, LLC, net of reserve for fair value of $6,749,554 and $1,668,952 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively

    -       -  
      15,732,163       16,212,057  
                 

Other Assets -

               

Cash and cash equivalents

    933,373       624,191  

Cash in escrow

    500,194       500,144  

Other

    83,508       124,173  

Other assets in discontinued operations

    22,549       21,869  
                 

Total assets

  $ 17,271,787     $ 17,482,434  
                 

Liabilities:

               

Unsecured loan payable

  $ 9,953,036     $ 9,967,009  

Mortgage note in discontinued operations

    10,000,000       10,000,000  

Accounts payable

    292,993       364,346  

Tenant security deposits

    93,021       90,223  

Accued expenses

    2,683,030       1,935,870  

Other liabilities in discontinued operations

    25,000       25,000  
                 

Total liabilities

    23,047,080       22,382,448  
                 

Partners' Deficit:

               
Units of partnership interest without par value;                

Limited partner - 7,753 units

    (5,756,112 )     (4,880,946 )

General partner - 1 unit

    (19,181 )     (19,068 )
                 

Total partners' deficit

    (5,775,293 )     (4,900,014 )
                 

Total liabilities and partners' deficit

  $ 17,271,787     $ 17,482,434  

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

 

 
24

 

 

SB PARTNERS

(A New York Limited Partnership)

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS 

 

   

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
                         
   

2014

   

2013

   

2012

 

Revenues:

                       

Base rental income

  $ 629,951     $ 608,579     $ 583,132  

Other rental income

    456,391       287,103       296,894  

Interest on short-term investments and other

    961       360       91  
                         

Total revenues

    1,087,303       896,042       880,117  
                         

Expenses:

                       

Real estate operating expenses

    334,195       346,159       317,155  

Interest on mortgage notes and unsecured loan payable

    508,197       504,261       511,904  

Depreciation and amortization

    167,120       189,649       194,806  

Real estate taxes

    130,661       127,190       123,481  

Management fees

    869,228       857,041       858,926  

Other

    160,464       149,453       157,657  
                         

Total expenses

    2,169,865       2,173,753       2,163,929  
                         

Loss from operations

    (1,082,562 )     (1,277,711 )     (1,283,812 )
                         

Equity in net income (loss) of investment

    5,080,602       1,668,952       (3,346,444 )
                         

Reserve for value of investment

    (5,080,602 )     (1,668,952 )     3,346,444  
                         

Loss from continuing operations

    (1,082,562 )     (1,277,711 )     (1,283,812 )
                         

Income from discontinued operations

    207,283       174,472       178,419  
                         

Net loss

    (875,279 )     (1,103,239 )     (1,105,393 )
                         

Loss allocated to general partner

    (113 )     (142 )     (143 )
                         

Loss allocated to limited partners

  $ (875,166 )   $ (1,103,097 )   $ (1,105,250 )
                         

Loss per unit of limited partnership interest (basic and diluted)

                       
                         

Loss from continuing operations

  $ (139.63 )   $ (164.80 )   $ (165.59 )

Income from discontinued operations

  $ 26.74     $ 22.50     $ 23.01  

Net loss

  $ (112.90 )   $ (142.30 )   $ (142.58 )
                         

Weighted Average Number of Units of Limited Partnership Interest Outstanding

    7,753       7,753       7,753  

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

 

 
25

 

 

SB PARTNERS

(A New York Limited Partnership)

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIT)

For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

 

Limited Partners:

                                       
   

Units of Partnership Interest

                         
                                         
   

Number

   

Amount

   

Cumulative Cash Distributions

   

Accumulated (Losses)

   

Total

 
                                         

Balance, January 1, 2012

    7,753     $ 119,968,973     $ (111,721,586 )   $ (10,919,986 )   $ (2,672,599 )

Net loss for the year

    -       -       -       (1,105,250 )     (1,105,250 )

Balance, December 31, 2012

    7,753       119,968,973       (111,721,586 )     (12,025,236 )     (3,777,849 )

Net loss for the year

    -       -       -       (1,103,097 )     (1,103,097 )

Balance, December 31, 2013

    7,753       119,968,973       (111,721,586 )     (13,128,333 )     (4,880,946 )

Net loss for the year

    -       -       -       (875,166 )     (875,166 )

Balance, December 31, 2014

    7,753     $ 119,968,973     $ (111,721,586 )   $ (14,003,499 )   $ (5,756,112 )

 

 

 

 

General Partner:

                                       
   

Units of Partnership Interest

                         
                                         
   

Number

   

Amount

   

Cumulative Cash Distributions

   

Accumulated (Losses)

   

Total

 
                                         

Balance, January 1, 2012

    1     $ 10,000     $ (26,364 )   $ (2,419 )   $ (18,783 )

Net loss for the year

    -       -       -       (143 )     (143 )

Balance, December 31, 2012

    1       10,000       (26,364 )     (2,562 )     (18,926 )

Net loss for the year

    -       -       -       (142 )     (142 )

Balance, December 31, 2013

    1       10,000       (26,364 )     (2,704 )     (19,068 )

Net loss for the year

    -       -       -       (113 )     (113 )

Balance, December 31, 2014

    1     $ 10,000     $ (26,364 )   $ (2,817 )   $ (19,181 )

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 
26

 

 

SB PARTNERS

(A New York Limited Partnership)

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

   

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
   

2014

   

2013

   

2012

 
                         

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:

                       

Net loss

  $ (875,279 )   $ (1,103,239 )   $ (1,105,393 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

                       

Equity in net (income) loss of investment

    (5,080,602 )     (1,668,952 )     3,346,444  

Reserve for fair value of investment

    5,080,602       1,668,952       (3,346,444 )

Depreciation and amortization

    522,695       545,223       550,379  

Net (increase) decrease in operating assets

    (2,816 )     678       513  

Net (decrease) increase in accounts payable

    (71,353 )     125,535       (12,213 )

Net increase in tenant security deposits

    2,798       2,798       2,798  

Net increase in accrued expenses

    747,160       733,682       739,229  
                         

Net cash provided by operating activites

    323,205       304,677       175,313  
                         

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:

                       

Interest earned on capital reserve escrow acount

    (50 )     (60 )     (50 )

Capital additions to real estate owned

    -       (66,845 )     -  
                         

Net cash (used in) investing activites

    (50 )     (66,905 )     (50 )
                         

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:

                       

Repayment of unsecured loan payable

    (13,973 )     (16,455 )     (86,106 )
                         

Net cash (used in) financing activities

    (13,973 )     (16,455 )     (86,106 )
                         

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

    309,182       221,317       89,157  
                         

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

    624,191       402,874       313,717  
                         

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $ 933,373     $ 624,191     $ 402,874  
                         
                         

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

                       

Cash paid during the year for interest

  $ 784,030     $ 784,261     $ 786,904  

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

 

 
27

 

 

SB PARTNERS

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

(1) ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

SB Partners, a New York limited partnership, and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Partnership"), have been engaged since April 1971 in acquiring, operating, and holding for investment a varying portfolio of real estate interests. SB Partners Real Estate Corporation (the "General Partner") serves as the general partner of the Partnership.

 

The significant accounting and financial reporting policies of the Partnership are as follows:

 

(a)

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SB Partners and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Revenues are recognized as earned and expenses are recognized as incurred. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with such principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

(b)

In connection with the mortgage financing on certain of its properties, the Partnership placed the assets and liabilities of the properties into single asset limited partnerships, limited liability companies or land trusts which hold title to the properties. The Partnership has effective control over such entities and holds 100% of the beneficial interest. Accordingly, the financial statements of these subsidiaries are consolidated with those of the Partnership.

 

(c)

Depreciation of buildings, furnishings and improvements is computed using the straight-line method of depreciation, based upon the estimated useful lives of the related properties, as follows:

 

Buildings and Improvements (in years)

    5 to 40  

Furnishings (in years)

    5 to 7  

 

    Investments in real estate are carried at historical cost and reviewed periodically for impairment. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for improvements, renewals and betterments, which increase the useful life of the real estate, are capitalized. Upon retirement or sale of property, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts. Amortization of deferred financing and refinancing costs is computed by amortizing the cost on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related mortgage notes.

 

(d)

Real estate properties are regularly evaluated on a property by property basis to determine if it is appropriate to write down carrying values to recognize an impairment of value. Impairment is determined by calculating the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows including the projected undiscounted future net proceeds from the sale of the property. In the event such sum is less than the net carrying value of the property, the property will be written down to estimated fair value. Based on the Partnership’s long-term hold strategy for its investments in real estate, the carrying value of its properties at December 31, 2014 is estimated to be fully realizable.

 

(e)

Real estate held for sale is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less selling costs. Upon determination that a property is held for sale, depreciation of such property is no longer recorded.

 

(f)

For financial reporting purposes, the Partnership considers all highly liquid, short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

 

(g)

The Partnership accounts for its investment in Sentinel Omaha, LLC at fair value. Determination of the fair value of Omaha involves numerous estimates and subjective judgments that are subject to change in response to current and future economic and market conditions, including, among other things, demand for residential apartments, competition, and operating cost levels such as labor, energy costs and real estate taxes. Judgments regarding these factors are not subject to precise quantification or verification and may change from time to time as economic and market factors change. (see Note 5)

 

(h)

Tenant leases at the multifamily properties owned by Omaha generally have terms of one year or less. Rental income at the multifamily properties is recognized when earned pursuant to the terms of the leases with tenants. Tenant leases at the industrial flex and warehouse distribution properties have terms that exceed one year. Rental income at the industrial flex and warehouse distribution properties is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases.

 

 
28

 

 

 

(i)

Gains on sales of investments in real estate are recognized in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to sales of real estate which require minimum levels of initial and continuing investment by the purchaser, and certain other tests be met, prior to the full recognition of profit at the time of the sale. When the tests are not met, gains on sales are recognized on either the installment or cost recovery methods.

 

(j)

Each partner is individually responsible for reporting its share of the Partnership's taxable income or loss. Accordingly, no provision has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for Federal, state or local income taxes.

 

(k)

Net income per unit of partnership interest has been computed based on the weighted average number of units of partnership interest outstanding during each year. There were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during each year.

 

(l)

The Partnership is engaged in only one industry segment, real estate investment, and therefore information regarding industry segments is not applicable and is not included in these consolidated financial statements.

 

(2) INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

The Partnership entered into a management agreement with the General Partner. Under the terms of this agreement, the General Partner is responsible for the acquisition, management and disposition of all investments, as well as performance of the day-to-day administrative operations and provision of office space for the Partnership.

 

For these services, the General Partner receives a management fee equal to 2% of the average amount of capital invested in real estate plus cumulative mortgage amortization payments, and 0.5% of capital not invested in real estate, as defined in the partnership agreement. The management fee amounted to $869,228, $857,041 and $858,926 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. Of the amounts earned in 2014, 2013 and 2012, $442,988, $430,618 and $437,293, respectively has been deferred while the obligations under the Loan Agreement are outstanding. The deferred amounts are included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. In addition, the General Partner is entitled to 25% of cash distributions in excess of the annual distribution preference, as defined in the partnership agreement. No such amounts were due for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 or 2012.

 

(3) INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE

During 2014 and 2013, the Partnership owned an industrial flex property in Maple Grove, Minnesota and a warehouse distribution property in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. The following is the cost basis and accumulated depreciation of the real estate investments owned by the Partnership as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:

 

                     

Real Estate at Cost

 
   

No. of

   

Year of

                   

Type

 

Prop.

   

Acquisition

 

Description

 

12/31/14

   

12/31/13

 
                                   
                                   

Industrial flex property

    1       2002  

60,345 sf

  $ 5,336,973     $ 5,336,973  
                                   

Less: accumulated depreciation

                      (1,631,056 )     (1,504,373 )
                                   

Net book value

                    $ 3,705,917     $ 3,832,600  
                                   

Real estate held for sale:

                                 

Warehouse distribution property

    1       2005  

226,000 sf

  $ 12,026,246     $ 12,379,457  

 

 

(4) REAL ESTATE HELD FOR SALE

 

During March 2015, the Partnership initiated marketing Lino Lakes, its warehouse distribution property located in Lino Lakes, MN for sale. The assets and liabilities for this property for 2014 and 2013 are reflected as assets and liabilities from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the results of operations for 2014, 2013 and 2012 are reflected as income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

 

 
29

 

 

(5) INVESTMENT SENTINEL OMAHA, LLC

 

In 2007, the Registrant made an investment in the amount of $37,200,000 representing a thirty percent ownership interest in Sentinel Omaha, LLC (“Omaha”). Omaha is a real estate investment company which as of December 31, 2014 owns 14 multifamily properties in 10 markets. Omaha is an affiliate of the Partnership’s general partner. The Omaha annual audited financial statements are filed as an exhibit to the Partnership’s annual Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

 

With respect to its investment in Omaha, the Registrant elected to adopt Accounting Standards Codification Topic 825. Accordingly, the investment is presented at fair value. Early adoption was elected, in part, because the audited financial statements of Omaha are presented at fair value and it was believed that a similar presentation would best reflect the value of the Registrant’s investment from its inception.

 

The following are the audited condensed financial statements (000’s omitted) of Omaha as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014.

 

 

Balance Sheet   2014     2013  
                 

Investment in real estate properties, at fair value

  $ 283,300     $ 267,600  

Other assets

    11,707       9,996  

Debt

    (267,495 )     (266,254 )

Other liabilities

    (5,013 )     (5,779 )

Members' equity

  $ 22,499     $ 5,563  

 

 

Statement of Operations   2014     2013     2012  
                         

Rent and other income

  $ 39,125     $ 39,179     $ 42,539  

Real estate operating expenses

    (18,871 )     (20,070 )     (22,526 )

Other expenses

    (10,225 )     (13,187 )     (15,047 )

Net unrealized gains and (losses)

    6,907       26,691       (12,727 )

Net realized (losses)

    -       (25,871 )     (4,573 )
                         

Net income (loss)

  $ 16,936     $ 6,742     $ (12,334 )

 

Determination of the fair value of Omaha involves numerous estimates and subjective judgments that are subject to change in response to current and future economic and market conditions, including, among other things, demand for residential apartments, competition, and operating cost levels such as labor, energy costs, real estate taxes and market interest rates. Judgments regarding these factors are not subject to precise quantification or verification and may change from time to time as economic and market factors change.

 

Estimated fair value is based on the criteria outlined in Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Codification No. 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820-10).  ASC 820-10 established a "three-tier" valuation hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions used in valuation techniques to measure fair value.  The three levels of fair value hierarchy under ASC 820-10 are described below:

 

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities;

 

Level 2 - Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities or quoted prices in less active dealer or broker markets;

 

Level 3 - Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and are unobservable.

 

Estimated fair value calculations were prepared by Omaha's management utilizing Level 3 inputs.

 

Further, the investment in Omaha is not consolidated because other investors have substantive ownership and participative rights regarding Omaha’s operations and therefore control does not vest in the Registrant. Were the Partnership deemed to control Omaha, it would have to be consolidated and therefore would impact the financial statements and related ratios.

 

 
30

 

 

On September 30, 2013, Omaha executed an amendment and restatement of its unsecured loan to December 31, 2017. The amendment and restatement, among other items, requires Omaha to make specific periodic principal payments on the unsecured loan at scheduled dates through December 31, 2017. It has also reduced the pay rate on a portion of the unsecured loan to a floating rate of 200 basis points over LIBOR while increasing the additional accrual rate on the same portion of the unsecured loan to 500 basis points over LIBOR. However, the aforementioned accrued interest will be forgiven if Omaha timely pays all of the above mentioned required principal payments, as defined in the loan agreement. Omaha is still precluded from paying distributions to its investors until the unsecured loan is paid in full. As a result of the aforementioned, the Partnership does not anticipate receiving any distributions from Omaha during the foreseeable future and has reserved 100% of the reported value of its investment in Omaha on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

Omaha reported a negative equity balance as of December 31, 2012 due to the additional loss in value of its real estate properties during 2012. For 2012, Registrant’s share of the net loss from Omaha exceeded Registrant’s remaining unreserved equity investment as of December 31, 2011. Registrant recorded the loss for 2012 only to the extent the unreserved equity investment was reduced to zero. During 2013, Omaha reported net income of $6,742,317 of which Registrant’s share was $2,022,695. However, for 2013, Registrant’s share of the net income from Omaha was reduced for the unrecognized loss from 2012 of $353,743.

 

(6) MORTGAGE NOTE AND UNSECURED LOAN PAYABLE

Mortgage note and unsecured loan payable consist of the following non-recourse first liens:

 

                             

Net Carrying Amount

 
             

Annual

           

December 31,

 
   

Interest Rate

     

Installment

   

Amount Due

                 

Property

 

Rate

 

Maturity Date

 

Payments

   

at Maturity

   

2014

   

2013

 
                                           

Unsecured loan payable:

                                         
                                           

Bank Loan (b):

                                         

Note A

                              3,953,036       3,967,009  

Note B

                              6,000,000       6,000,000  
                              $ 9,953,036     $ 9,967,009  
                                           

Mortgage note in discontinued operations:

                                         
                                           

Lino Lakes (a)

    5.80 %

October, 2015

  $ 580,000     $ 10,000,000     $ 10,000,000     $ 10,000,000  

 

 

(a)  Annual installment payments include interest only.

(b)  On September 17, 2007, the Partnership entered into a bank loan (the “Loan”) with a bank (“Holder”) in the amount of $22,000,000, which matured on October 1, 2008 and provided for interest only monthly payments based upon LIBOR plus 1.95%. On April 29, 2011, the Holder of the unsecured credit facility and the Partnership executed a new Loan Agreement (“Loan Agreement”) on the following terms:

 

 

1)

In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, the Partnership was required to make an immediate payment to Holder of $11,930,430, reducing the balance due under the unsecured credit facility to $10,069,570. The payment was made from proceeds resulting from the sale of 175 Ambassador Drive. Additional proceeds from the sale were used to pay Holder’s legal and appraisal costs and to fund a reserve account for future tenant improvement and leasing costs, as needed. The remaining outstanding obligation in the amount of $10,069,570 was divided into two notes (“Note A” and “Note B;” together, the “Notes”).

 

 

2)

Note A with a current balance of $3,953,036 has a maturity of July 31, 2015. The Partnership has one 1-year option to extend the maturity if certain conditions are satisfied. Note A requires monthly payments of accrued interest at an annual fixed rate of 5% until paid in full. The Partnership is required to make an additional fixed principal payment of $9,570 on April 1, 2015 and $30,000 monthly thereafter until paid in full.

 

 
31

 

 

 

3)

Note B in the amount of $6,000,000 has a maturity date of April 29, 2018. The Partnership has three 1-year options to extend the maturity date if certain conditions are satisfied. Note B accrues interest at an annual fixed rate of 5% but only until all interest and principal have been paid in full on Note A. Thereafter Note B does not accrue any interest. Payments of interest and principal are deferred until the Partnership’s investment in Sentinel Omaha LLC (“Omaha”) pays distributions to the Partnership. Distributions from Omaha would be used first to pay accrued interest on the Note B obligation, then principal on the Note B obligation. If there are no distributions from Omaha prior to the Note B maturity, all interest and principal is due at maturity, subject to the above mentioned extensions. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, $1,113,339 and $809,167, respectively of Note B interest have been accrued and are included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet.

 

 

4)

The Notes may be voluntarily prepaid upon notice to the Holder, subject to certain requirements as to the application of payments. The Partnership’s obligations under the Notes may be accelerated upon default.

 

 

5)

Until the Partnership’s obligations under the Notes are satisfied in full, the Partnership is required to pay a portion of its net operating income (after payment of certain permitted expenses), and the net proceeds from the sale, transfer or refinancing of its remaining properties and investments, toward the Notes while retaining the other portion to increase cash reserves. During May 2014 and May 2013, the Partnership paid $13,973 and $16,455, respectively to the Holder to pay down a portion of the outstanding balance of Note A. The proceeds represented excess net operating income, as defined, for the years ended April 30, 2014 and 2013. While the obligations under the Notes are outstanding the Partnership is precluded from making distributions to its partners.

 

 

6)

The Partnership, its general partner and the Holder also entered into a Management Subordination Agreement accruing a portion of the investment management fee payable by the Partnership to its general partner so long as the Notes remain outstanding. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, $1,569,691 and $1,126,703, respectively of investment management fees have been accrued and are included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet.

 

 

7)

As additional security for the Partnership’s payment of its obligations under the Loan Agreement, the Partnership, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Eagle IV Realty, LLC, has executed a Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Fixture Financing Statement (“Eagle IV Security Agreement”) and a Pledge Agreement (“Eagle IV Pledge Agreement”) in favor of Holder. The Eagle IV Security Agreement provides Holder with a security interest on the Partnership’s property located in Maple Grove, Minnesota (“Eagle IV”) of up to $5,000,000. The Eagle IV Pledge Agreement pledges to Holder the Partnership’s membership interest in Eagle IV Realty, LLC, the direct owner of Eagle IV. The Partnership has no other debt obligation secured by Eagle IV. The Loan Agreement also provides for a negative pledge on the Partnership’s remaining properties and investments.

 

Scheduled principal payments on mortgage note and unsecured loan payable are as follows:

 

2015

    13,953,036  

2016

    -  

2017

    -  

2018

    6,000,000  

2019

    -  

Thereafter

    -  
         

Total

  $ 19,953,036  

 

 
32

 

 

(7) QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

 

   

Revenues from

           

Net Loss Per

   

Equity Income

 
   

Continuing

           

Unit of Limited

   

(Loss) on

 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

Operations

   

Net Loss

   

Partnership Interest

   

Investment

 
                                 

First Quarter

  $ 228,308     $ (284,283 )   $ (36.67 )   $ 604,883  

Second Quarter

    292,709       (205,732 )     (26.53 )     854,900  

Third Quarter

    279,544       (196,189 )     (25.30 )     1,435,648  

Fourth Quarter

    286,742       (189,075 )     (24.40 )     2,185,171  
                                 
                                 

Year ended December 31, 2013

                               
                                 

First Quarter

  $ 219,778     $ (272,285 )   $ (35.12 )   $ 2,207,401  

Second Quarter

    222,796       (296,015 )     (38.18 )     2,392,276  

Third Quarter

    225,837       (266,622 )     (34.39 )     (58,597 )

Fourth Quarter

    227,631       (268,317 )     (34.61 )     (2,872,128 )

 

 

(8) FEDERAL INCOME TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

A reconciliation of net (loss) for financial reporting purposes to net (loss) for Federal income tax reporting purposes is as follows:

 

   

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
   

2014

   

2013

   

2012

 
                         

Net loss for financial reporting purposes

  $ (875,279 )   $ (1,103,239 )   $ (1,105,393 )
                         

Adjustment to net loss on sale of investment in real estate property to reflect differences between tax and financial reporting bases of assets and liabilities

    -       2,758,177       727,932  
                         

Difference between tax and financial statement equity in net loss of investment

    (247,710 )     (8,773,783 )     (3,529,185 )
                         

Accrued investment management fees, mortgage interest and partnership administrative costs not expensed for tax purposes

    791,155       774,618       1,279,187  
                         

Difference between tax and financial statement depreciation

    20,879       (15,450 )     1,091  
                         

Net loss for Federal income tax reporting purposes

  $ (310,955 )   $ (6,359,677 )   $ (2,626,368 )
                         

Net ordinary loss for Federal income tax reporting purposes

  $ (310,955 )   $ (1,356,740 )   $ (1,982,373 )

Net capital (Sec. 1231) (loss) for Federal income tax reporting purposes

    -       (5,002,937 )     (643,995 )
                         
    $ (310,955 )   $ (6,359,677 )   $ (2,626,368 )
                         
                         

Weighted average number of units of limited partnership interest outstanding

    7,753       7,753       7,753  

 

 

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the tax bases of the Partnership's assets and liabilities were approximately $14,488,665 and $16,333,404 of assets, and $23,047,080 and $22,382,448 of liabilities, respectively.

 

(9) MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Certain affiliates of the General Partner oversee the management and operation of various real estate properties, including those owned by the Partnership. Services performed by affiliates are billed at actual or allocated cost, percentage of revenues or net equity. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 billings to the Partnership amounting to $131,120, $128,139 and $129,919, respectively, and are included in real estate operating expenses.

 

 
33

 

 

In November 2012 an affiliate of the General Partner commenced maintaining and updating the investor database and preparing the tax K-1 forms and related schedules which previously had been prepared by an unaffiliated company. The fee charged by the affiliate for the similar service is lower than the fee previously charged by the unaffiliated company. Fees charged for 2014, 2013 and a part of 2012 were $54,000, $54,000 and $9,000, respectively.

 

In connection with the mortgage financing of certain properties, the respective lenders required the Partnership to place the assets and liabilities of these properties into single asset limited partnerships which hold title to these properties. A trust company affiliated with the General Partner holds the general partner interest in each single asset limited partnership as trustee for the Partnership. For its services, the affiliate is paid an annual fee, which aggregated $0 in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively, and is based upon the trust company's standard rate schedule.

 

(10) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Partnership’s financial instruments include cash, cash equivalents, and mortgage notes payable and unsecured loan. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents are reasonable estimates of fair value. Mortgage notes and unsecured loans payable have been valued by discounting future payments required under the terms of the obligations at rates currently available to the Partnership for debt with similar maturities, terms and underlying collateral. The fair value of the mortgage note in discontinued operations and unsecured loan payable is estimated to be $19,953,036 and $19,967,009 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

(11) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Partnership is a party to certain actions directly arising from its normal business operations. While the ultimate outcome is not presently determinable with certainty, the Partnership believes that the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial statements.

 

The Partnership leases its properties to tenants under operating lease agreements, which require tenants at the industrial flex and warehouse distribution properties to pay all or part of certain operating and other expenses of the property. The minimum future rentals to be received in respect of non-cancelable commercial operating leases with unexpired terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2014 are $1,904,778 for 2015; $1,944,456 for 2016; $1,348,401 for 2017 and $0 for 2018 and 2019. These amounts include the minimum rents from the tenant leasing 100% of the space at Eagle Lake IV. The maturity date of this lease was extended to July 31, 2019 under an extension signed in March 2015. However, the tenant has a right to terminate the lease after July 31, 2017 after paying a termination penalty. Neither the minimum rents nor the early termination penalty is included in the aforementioned amounts. The amounts above also include the minimum rents due from the tenant leasing 100% of the space at Lino Lakes. The Partnership has engaged a broker to market the property for an expected sale during the third quarter of 2015.

 

Pursuant to the original investment agreement, the Partnership may be called upon to contribute, in cash, an additional $3,720,000 to the capital of Omaha, as and when required, as determined by the Manager. In addition, the Partnership shall not have any liability to restore any negative balance in its capital account.

 

Should a default occur by Omaha on its unsecured credit facility, the lender would not have any recourse to the Partnership and will look solely to Omaha’s membership interest in Sentinel White Plains LLC. Sentinel White Plains LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sentinel Omaha LLC and holds the assets and liabilities of the Omaha properties through wholly owned single asset limited partnerships or limited liability companies.

 

 
34

 

 

SB PARTNERS

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

DECEMBER 31, 2014

 

Column A

 

Column B

     

Column C

   

Column D

 
           

Initial Cost to the Registrant

   

 

 

Description

 

Encumbrances

   

Land

   

Buildings and Improvements

   

Total

   

 

Costs

Capitalized

Subsequent

to Acquisition

 
                                         

INDUSTRIAL FLEX

                                       

Minnesota - Maple Grove (Eagle Lake Business Center IV)

  $ -     $ 470,000     $ 4,243,385     $ 4,713,385     $ 623,588  
                                         

DISTRIBUTION CENTER

                                       

Minnesota - Lino Lakes (435 Park Court)

    10,000,000       1,515,000       13,760,390       15,275,390       20,646  
                                         
    $ 10,000,000     $ 1,985,000     $ 18,003,775     $ 19,988,775     $ 644,234  

 

 

 

 

Column A

   

Column E

   

Column F

 
   

Gross amount at which Carried at End of Year

         
   

(Notes a & c)

         

Description

 

Land

   

Buildings and Improvements

   

Total

   

Accumulated

Depreciation

(Notes b & d)

 
                                 

INDUSTRIAL FLEX

                               

Minnesota - Maple Grove (Eagle Lake Business Center IV)

  $ 470,000     $ 4,866,973     $ 5,336,973     $ 1,631,056  
                                 

DISTRIBUTION CENTER

                               

Minnesota - Lino Lakes (435 Park Court)

    1,515,000       13,781,036       15,296,036       3,269,790  
                                 
    $ 1,985,000     $ 18,648,009     $ 20,633,009     $ 4,900,846  

 

 
35

 

 

SB PARTNERS

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION - CONTINUED

DECEMBER 31, 2014

 

Column A

Column G

Column H

 

Column I

 

Description

Date of

Construction

Date

Acquired

 

Life on which

Depreciation in

Latest Statement

of Operations

is Computed

(in years)

 
           

INDUSTRIAL FLEX

           
Minnesota - Maple Grove (Eagle Lake Business Center IV)

2000

Jun 2002

    7 to 39  
             

DISTRIBUTION CENTER

           
Minnesota - Lino Lakes (435 Park Court)

2004

Oct 2005

    7 to 39  
             
   -  -      

 

 

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III:

 

   

2014

   

2013

   

2012

 
                         

(a)  Reconciliation of amounts shown in Column E:

                       

Balance at beginning of year

  $ 20,633,009     $ 20,566,164     $ 20,566,164  

Additions - Cost of improvements (reimbursements)

    0       66,845       0  
                         

Deductions - Sales

    0       0       0  
                         

Balance at end of year

  $ 20,633,009     $ 20,633,009     $ 20,566,164  
                         
                         

(b)  Reconciliation of amounts shown in Column F:

                       

Balance at beginning of year

  $ 4,420,952     $ 3,931,815     $ 3,437,522  

Additions - Depreciation expense for the year

    479,894       489,137       494,293  
                         

Deductions - Sales

    0       0       0  
                         
    $ 4,900,846     $ 4,420,952     $ 3,931,815  
                         

(c)  Aggregate cost basis for Federal income tax reporting purposes

  $ 20,124,541     $ 20,124,541     $ 20,057,696  
                         

(d)  Accumulated depreciation for Federal income tax reporting purposes

  $ 5,513,791     $ 5,061,514     $ 4,573,006  

 

 

 36