Attached files

file filename
EX-31.2 - AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPex31-220.htm
EX-32 - AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPex32-20.htm
EX-31.1 - AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPex31-120.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIPFinancial_Report.xls
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended:  June 30, 2014

Commission File Number:  000-23778

AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

State of Minnesota
 
41-1729121
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
                 30 East 7th Street, Suite 1300
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
 
(651) 227-7333
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Registrant’s telephone number)

Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     x Yes    o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     x Yes    o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

o Large accelerated filer
o Accelerated filer
o Non-accelerated filer
x Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     o Yes    x No
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

INDEX


   
Page
Part I – Financial Information
 
       
 
Item 1.
Financial Statements:
 
       
   
Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013
3
       
   
Statements for the Periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
 
         
     
Income
4
         
     
Cash Flows
5
         
     
Changes in Partners’ Capital
6
         
   
Notes to Financial Statements
7 - 13
       
 
Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
 
     
Condition and Results of Operations
14 - 20
       
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
20
       
 
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
20
       
Part II – Other Information
 
       
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
21
       
 
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
21
       
 
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
21
       
 
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
22
       
 
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
22
       
 
Item 5.
Other Information
22
       
 
Item 6.
Exhibits
22
       
Signatures
22

 
Page 2 of 22
 
 

 
 
AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BALANCE SHEET

ASSETS

   
June 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2014
   
2013
 
   
(unaudited)
       
Current Assets:
           
Cash
  $ 3,439,541     $ 2,414,005  
                 
Real Estate Held for Investment:
               
Land
    3,788,830       3,788,830  
Buildings and Equipment
    8,149,958       8,149,958  
Acquired Intangible Lease Assets
    703,997       703,997  
Real Estate Investments, at cost
    12,642,785       12,642,785  
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
    (2,657,196 )     (2,489,448 )
Real Estate Held for Investment, Net
    9,985,589       10,153,337  
Real Estate Held for Sale
    901,463       1,653,573  
Total Real Estate
    10,887,052       11,806,910  
Total Assets
  $ 14,326,593     $ 14,220,915  

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL

Current Liabilities:
           
Payable to AEI Fund Management, Inc.
  $ 87,801     $ 74,979  
Distributions Payable
    297,469       299,700  
Unearned Rent
    76,143       13,474  
Total Current Liabilities
    461,413       388,153  
Long-term Liabilities:
               
Acquired Below-Market Lease Intangibles, Net
    69,226       71,978  
                 
Partners’ Capital:
               
General Partners
    5,485       5,133  
Limited Partners – 24,000 Units authorized;
   21,155 and 21,367 Units issued and outstanding
   as of 6/30/14 and 12/31/13, respectively
    13,790,469       13,755,651  
Total Partners' Capital
    13,795,954       13,760,784  
Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital
  $ 14,326,593     $ 14,220,915  


The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
 
Page 3 of 22
 
 

 
 
AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF INCOME
(unaudited)


   
Three Months Ended June 30
   
Six Months Ended June 30
 
   
2014
   
2013
   
2014
   
2013
 
                         
Rental Income
  $ 298,962     $ 298,962     $ 597,925     $ 597,925  
                                 
Expenses:
                               
Partnership Administration – Affiliates
    64,196       55,553       120,983       114,549  
Partnership Administration and Property
   Management – Unrelated Parties
    27,453       22,449       44,820       37,406  
Depreciation and Amortization
    76,700       76,700       153,400       153,400  
Total Expenses
    168,349       154,702       319,203       305,355  
                                 
Operating Income
    130,613       144,260       278,722       292,570  
                                 
Other Income:
                               
Interest Income
    2,033       185       3,772       455  
                                 
Income from Continuing Operations
    132,646       144,445       282,494       293,025  
                                 
Income from Discontinued Operations
    423,253       45,335       515,675       100,413  
                                 
Net Income
  $ 555,899     $ 189,780     $ 798,169     $ 393,438  
                                 
Net Income Allocated:
                               
General Partners
  $ 5,559     $ 1,897     $ 7,982     $ 3,934  
Limited Partners
    550,340       187,883       790,187       389,504  
Total
  $ 555,899     $ 189,780     $ 798,169     $ 393,438  
                                 
Income per Limited Partnership Unit:
                         
Continuing Operations
  $ 6.21     $ 6.66     $ 13.15     $ 13.49  
Discontinued Operations
    19.80       2.09       24.02       4.62  
Total – Basic and Diluted
  $ 26.01     $ 8.75     $ 37.17     $ 18.11  
                                 
Weighted Average Units Outstanding –
      Basic and Diluted
    21,155       21,465       21,261       21,512  
                                 

The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
 
Page 4 of 22
 
 

 
 
AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)


   
Six Months Ended June 30
 
   
2014
   
2013
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
           
Net Income
  $ 798,169     $ 393,438  
                 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income
To Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
               
Depreciation and Amortization
    164,996       211,637  
Gain on Sale of Real Estate
    (479,111 )     0  
(Increase) Decrease in Receivables
    0       1,843  
Increase (Decrease) in Payable to
   AEI Fund Management, Inc.
    12,822       (69,394 )
Increase (Decrease) in Unearned Rent
    62,669       20,758  
Total Adjustments
    (238,624 )     164,844  
Net Cash Provided By
   Operating Activities
    559,545       558,282  
                 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
               
Proceeds from Sale of Real Estate
    1,231,221       0  
                 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
               
Distributions Paid to Partners
    (597,173 )     (599,392 )
Redemption Payments
    (168,057 )     (79,194 )
Net Cash Used For
   Financing Activities
    (765,230 )     (678,586 )
                 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
    1,025,536       (120,304 )
                 
Cash, beginning of period
    2,414,005       458,643  
                 
Cash, end of period
  $ 3,439,541     $ 338,339  
                 





The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
 
Page 5 of 22
 
 

 
 
AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(unaudited)


   
General Partners
   
Limited Partners
   
Total
   
Limited Partnership Units Outstanding
 
                         
Balance, December 31, 2012
  $ 4,274     $ 14,301,104     $ 14,305,378       21,559.91  
                                 
Distributions Declared
    (5,993 )     (593,407 )     (599,400 )        
                                 
Redemption Payments
    (792 )     (78,402 )     (79,194 )     (95.13 )
                                 
Net Income
    3,934       389,504       393,438          
                                 
Balance, June 30, 2013
  $ 1,423     $ 14,018,799     $ 14,020,222       21,464.78  
                                 
                                 
Balance, December 31, 2013
  $ 5,133     $ 13,755,651     $ 13,760,784       21,367.42  
                                 
Distributions Declared
    (5,950 )     (588,992 )     (594,942 )        
                                 
Redemption Payments
    (1,680 )     (166,377 )     (168,057 )     (212.56 )
                                 
Net Income
    7,982       790,187       798,169          
                                 
Balance, June 30, 2014
  $ 5,485     $ 13,790,469     $ 13,795,954       21,154.86  
                                 
















The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
 
Page 6 of 22
 
 

 
 
AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2014
(unaudited)

(1)  The condensed statements included herein have been prepared by the registrant, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results of operations for the interim period, on a basis consistent with the annual audited statements.  The adjustments made to these condensed statements consist only of normal recurring adjustments.  Certain information, accounting policies, and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the registrant believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.  It is suggested that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the summary of significant accounting policies and notes thereto included in the registrant’s latest annual report on Form 10-K.

(2)  Organization –

AEI Net Lease Income & Growth Fund XX Limited Partnership (“Partnership”) was formed to acquire and lease commercial properties to operating tenants.  The Partnership's operations are managed by AEI Fund Management XX, Inc. (“AFM”), the Managing General Partner.  Robert P. Johnson, the President and sole director of AFM, serves as the Individual General Partner.  AFM is a wholly owned subsidiary of AEI Capital Corporation of which Mr. Johnson is the majority shareholder.  AEI Fund Management, Inc. (“AEI”), an affiliate of AFM, performs the administrative and operating functions for the Partnership.

The terms of the Partnership offering called for a subscription price of $1,000 per Limited Partnership Unit, payable on acceptance of the offer.  The Partnership commenced operations on June 30, 1993 when minimum subscriptions of 1,500 Limited Partnership Units ($1,500,000) were accepted.  On January 19, 1995, the offering terminated when the maximum subscription limit of 24,000 Limited Partnership Units was reached.  Under the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement, the Limited Partners and General Partners contributed funds of $24,000,000 and $1,000, respectively.

During operations, any Net Cash Flow, as defined, which the General Partners determine to distribute will be distributed 90% to the Limited Partners and 10% to the General Partners; provided, however, that such distributions to the General Partners will be subordinated to the Limited Partners first receiving an annual, noncumulative distribution of Net Cash Flow equal to 10% of their Adjusted Capital Contribution, as defined, and, provided further, that in no event will the General Partners receive less than 1% of such Net Cash Flow per annum.  Distributions to Limited Partners will be made pro rata by Units.

Page 7 of 22
 
 

 
 
AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

(2)  Organization – (Continued)

Any Net Proceeds of Sale, as defined, from the sale or financing of properties which the General Partners determine to distribute will, after provisions for debts and reserves, be paid in the following manner: (i) first, 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partners until the Limited Partners receive an amount equal to: (a) their Adjusted Capital Contribution plus (b) an amount equal to 12% of their Adjusted Capital Contribution per annum, cumulative but not compounded, to the extent not previously distributed from Net Cash Flow;  (ii) any remaining balance will be distributed 90% to the Limited Partners and 10% to the General Partners.  Distributions to the Limited Partners will be made pro rata by Units.

For tax purposes, profits from operations, other than profits attributable to the sale, exchange, financing, refinancing or other disposition of property, will be allocated first in the same ratio in which, and to the extent, Net Cash Flow is distributed to the Partners for such year.  Any additional profits will be allocated in the same ratio as the last dollar of Net Cash Flow is distributed.  Net losses from operations will be allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partners.

For tax purposes, profits arising from the sale, financing, or other disposition of property will be allocated in accordance with the Partnership Agreement as follows: (i) first, to those partners with deficit balances in their capital accounts in an amount equal to the sum of such deficit balances; (ii) second, 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partners until the aggregate balance in the Limited Partners' capital accounts equals the sum of the Limited Partners' Adjusted Capital Contributions plus an amount equal to 12% of their Adjusted Capital Contributions per annum, cumulative but not compounded, to the extent not previously allocated; (iii) third, the balance of any remaining gain will then be allocated 90% to the Limited Partners and 10% to the General Partners.  Losses will be allocated 98% to the Limited Partners and 2% to the General Partners.

The General Partners are not required to currently fund a deficit capital balance.  Upon liquidation of the Partnership or withdrawal by a General Partner, the General Partners will contribute to the Partnership an amount equal to the lesser of the deficit balances in their capital accounts or 1% of total Limited Partners' and General Partners' capital contributions.

 
Page 8 of 22
 
 

 
 
AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

(2)  Organization – (Continued)

In December 2008, the Managing General Partner mailed a Consent Statement (Proxy) seeking the consent of the Limited Partners to continue the Partnership for an additional 60 months or to initiate the final disposition, liquidation and distribution of all of the Partnership’s properties and assets.  On January 9, 2009, the proposal to continue the Partnership was approved with a majority of Units voted in favor of the continuation proposal.  In June 2014, the Managing General Partner mailed a Consent Statement (Proxy) seeking the consent of the Limited Partners to continue the Partnership for an additional 60 months or to initiate the final disposition, liquidation and distribution of all of the Partnership’s properties and assets within 24 to 36 months.  Approval of either proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding units.  On July 22, 2014, the votes were counted and neither proposal received the required majority vote.  As a result, the Partnership will not liquidate and will continue in operation until the Limited Partners vote to authorize the sale of all of the Partnership's properties or December 31, 2043, as stated in the Limited Partnership Agreement. However, in approximately five years, the Managing General Partner expects to again submit the question to liquidate to a vote by the Limited Partners.

(3) Recently Adopted Accounting Standards -

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360) Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.”  This topic amends the requirements for reporting discontinued operations.  The disposal of a component must represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Partnership’s operations and financial results in order to be reported as discontinued operations, and require certain additional interim and annual disclosures.  The amendments in this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014 with early adoption permitted.  The Partnership has early adopted this standard effective January 1, 2014 and has applied the provisions prospectively.  As a result, the Partnership anticipates that properties will not be considered discontinued operations when the properties are sold after January 1, 2014, with the exception of properties that were classified as Real Estate Held for Sale at December 31, 2013.

(4)  Reclassification –

Certain items related to discontinued operations in the prior year’s financial statements have been reclassified to conform to 2014 presentation.  These reclassifications had no effect on Partners’ capital, net income or cash flows.

 
Page 9 of 22
 
 

 
 
 
AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

(5)  Real Estate Held for Investment –

The Partnership owns a 40.1354% interest in a HomeTown Buffet restaurant in Albuquerque, New Mexico.  The remaining interests in this property are owned by unrelated third parties, who own the property with the Partnership as tenants-in-common.  On January 31, 2011, the lease term expired and the tenant returned possession of the property to the owners.  The owners listed the property for lease or sale with a real estate broker in the Albuquerque area.  While the property is vacant, the Partnership is responsible for its 40.1354% share of real estate taxes and other costs associated with maintaining the property.

Based on its long-lived asset valuation analysis, the Partnership determined the HomeTown Buffet restaurant was impaired.  As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2013, a charge to continuing operations for real estate impairment of $61,002 was recognized, which was the difference between the carrying value at December 31, 2013 of $336,002 and the estimated fair value of $275,000.  The charge was recorded against the cost of the land and building.

(6)  Payable to AEI Fund Management, Inc. –

AEI Fund Management, Inc. performs the administrative and operating functions for the Partnership.  The payable to AEI Fund Management represents the balance due for those services.  This balance is non-interest bearing and unsecured and is to be paid in the normal course of business.

(7)  Discontinued Operations –

During 2012, the Partnership decided to sell its 44% interest in the Champps Americana restaurant in Utica, Michigan and classified it as Real Estate Held for Sale.  In February 2013, Champps Operating Corporation (“Champps’), the tenant of the property, approached the Partnership with a request to adjust the rent on the property to a market rental rate based on the restaurant’s performance and the current conditions in the market.  In April 2013, after reviewing financial information for the restaurant and the tenant, and analyzing the local real estate market for the property, the Partnership and the property’s other co-owners entered into an agreement to reduce the annual rent for the property by 63% to $90,880.  The Partnership’s share of this rent was $39,987.  On December 15, 2013, Champps filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization.  In February 2014, Champps closed the restaurant, filed a motion with the bankruptcy court to reject the lease and returned possession of the property to the owners.  The owners listed the property for sale or lease with a real estate broker in the Utica area.  While the property is vacant, the Partnership is responsible for its 44% share of real estate taxes and other costs associated with maintaining the property.

 
Page 10 of 22
 
 

 
 
AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

(7)  Discontinued Operations – (Continued)

Based on its long-lived asset valuation analysis, the Partnership determined the Champps property was impaired.  As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2013, a charge to discontinued operations for real estate impairment of $85,000 was recognized, which was the difference between the carrying value at December 31, 2013 of $733,000 and the estimated fair value of $648,000.  The charge was recorded against the cost of the land and building.

In June 2014, the Partnership and the other co-owners of the Champps property entered into an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third party.  The sale is subject to contingencies and may not be completed.  If the sale is completed, the Partnership expects to receive net proceeds of approximately $705,000.  If the sale is not completed, the owners will seek another buyer for the property and may not be able to negotiate a purchase agreement with similar economic terms.

In September 2013, the Partnership decided to sell the Royal Buffet restaurant in Colorado Springs, Colorado and classified it as Real Estate Held for Sale.  Based on its long-lived asset valuation analysis, the Partnership determined the Royal Buffet restaurant was impaired.  As a result, in the third quarter of 2013, a charge to discontinued operations for real estate impairment of $322,868 was recognized, which was the difference between the carrying value at September 30, 2013 of $642,868 and the estimated fair value of $320,000.  The charge was recorded against the cost of the land and building.  On December 20, 2013, the Partnership sold the property to an unrelated third party.  The Partnership received net sale proceeds of $339,514, which resulted in a net gain of $19,514.

On August 2, 2013, the Partnership sold its 40% interest in the Scott & White Clinic in College Station, Texas to an unrelated third party.  The Partnership received net sale proceeds of $1,869,225, which resulted in a net gain of $504,826.  At the time of sale, the cost and related accumulated depreciation was $1,470,224 and $105,825, respectively.

During the first six months of 2014, the Partnership sold 33.6574% of the Applebee’s restaurant in Sandusky, Ohio, in six separate transactions, to unrelated third parties.  The Partnership received total net sale proceeds of $1,231,221, which resulted in a net gain of $479,111.  The cost and related accumulated depreciation of the interests sold was $955,079 and $202,969, respectively.

Subsequent to June 30, 2014, the Partnership sold its remaining 11.3426% interest in the Applebee’s restaurant in Sandusky, Ohio, in two separate transactions, to unrelated third parties.  The Partnership received total net sale proceeds of approximately $412,000, which resulted in a net gain of approximately $158,500.  The cost and related accumulated depreciation of the interests sold was $321,864 and $68,401, respectively.  At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the property was classified as Real Estate Held for Sale with a carrying value of $253,463 and $1,005,573, respectively.
 
 
Page 11 of 22
 
 

 

AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

(7)  Discontinued Operations – (Continued)

During the first six months of 2014 and 2013, the Partnership distributed net sale proceeds of $278,943 and $26,984, respectively.  The Limited Partners received distributions of $276,154 and $26,714 and the General Partners received distributions of $2,789 and $270 for the periods, respectively.  The Limited Partners’ distributions represented $13.04 and $1.24 per Unit for the periods, respectively.

The financial results for these properties are reflected as Discontinued Operations in the accompanying financial statements.  The following are the results of discontinued operations:

   
Three Months Ended June 30
 
Six Months Ended June 30
   
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
                 
Rental Income
$
17,144
$
77,211
$
50,892
$
167,321
Property Management Expenses
 
(9,205)
 
(8,556)
 
(14,328)
 
(20,267)
Depreciation
 
0
 
(23,320)
 
0
 
(46,641)
Gain on Disposal of Real Estate
 
415,314
 
0
 
479,111
 
0
Income from Discontinued Operations
$
423,253
$
45,335
$
515,675
$
100,413


   
Three Months Ended June 30
 
Six Months Ended June 30
   
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations:
               
Operating Activities
$
7,939
$
68,655
$
36,564
$
147,054
Investing Activities
$
1,069,088
$
0
$
1,231,221
$
0
                 

 
Page 12 of 22
 
 

 
AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)

(8)  Fair Value Measurements –

Fair value, as defined by United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US GAAP”), is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date in the principal or most advantageous market.  US GAAP establishes a hierarchy in determining the fair value of an asset or liability.  The fair value hierarchy has three levels of inputs, both observable and unobservable.  US GAAP requires the utilization of the lowest possible level of input to determine fair value.  Level 1 inputs include quoted market prices in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.   Level 2 inputs are market data, other than Level 1 inputs, that are observable either directly or indirectly.  Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted market prices in an inactive market, and other observable information that can be corroborated by market data.  Level 3 inputs are unobservable and corroborated by little or no market data.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Partnership had no financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis that would require disclosure under this pronouncement.  The Partnership had the following nonfinancial assets measured on a nonrecurring basis that were recorded at fair value during 2013.

The Champps restaurant in Utica, Michigan, with a carrying amount of $733,000 at December 31, 2013, was written down to its estimated fair value of $648,000 after completing our long-lived asset valuation analysis.  The resulting impairment charge of $85,000 was included in earnings for the fourth quarter of 2013.  The fair value of the property was based upon comparable sales of similar properties, which are considered Level 2 inputs in the valuation hierarchy.

The Royal Buffet restaurant in Colorado Springs, Colorado, with a carrying amount of $642,868 at September 30, 2013, was written down to its estimated fair value of $320,000 after completing our long-lived asset valuation analysis.  The resulting impairment charge of $322,868 was included in earnings for the third quarter of 2013.  The fair value of the property was based upon comparable sales of similar properties, which are considered Level 2 inputs in the valuation hierarchy.

The HomeTown Buffet restaurant in Albuquerque, New Mexico, with a carrying amount of $336,002 at December 31, 2013, was written down to its estimated fair value of $275,000 after completing our long-lived asset valuation analysis.  The resulting impairment charge of $61,002 was included in earnings for the fourth quarter of 2013.  The fair value of the property was based upon comparable sales of similar properties, which are considered Level 2 inputs in the valuation hierarchy.
 
 
 
Page 13 of 22
 
 

 

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

This section contains "forward-looking statements" which represent management's expectations or beliefs concerning future events, including statements regarding anticipated application of cash, expected returns from rental income, growth in revenue, the sufficiency of cash to meet operating expenses, rates of distribution, and other matters.  These, and other forward-looking statements, should be evaluated in the context of a number of factors that may affect the Partnership's financial condition and results of operations, including the following:

 
Market and economic conditions which affect the value of the properties the Partnership owns and the cash from rental income such properties generate;
 
the federal income tax consequences of rental income, deductions, gain on sales and other items and the effects of these consequences for the Partners;
 
resolution by the General Partners of conflicts with which they may be confronted;
 
the success of the General Partners of locating properties with favorable risk return characteristics;
 
the effect of tenant defaults; and
 
the condition of the industries in which the tenants of properties owned by the Partnership operate.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The Partnership’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP).  Preparing the financial statements requires management to use judgment in the application of these accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions.  These judgments will affect the reported amounts of the Partnership’s assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financial statements and will affect the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods.  It is possible that the carrying amount of the Partnership’s assets and liabilities, or the results of reported operations, will be affected if management’s estimates or assumptions prove inaccurate.

Management of the Partnership evaluates the following accounting estimates on an ongoing basis, and has discussed the development and selection of these estimates and the management discussion and analysis disclosures regarding them with managing partner of the Partnership.

Allocation of Purchase Price of Acquired Properties

Upon acquisition of real properties, the Partnership records them in the financial statements at cost.  The purchase price is allocated to tangible assets, consisting of land and building, and to identified intangible assets and liabilities, which may include the value of above market and below market leases and the value of in-place leases.  The allocation of the purchase price is based upon the fair value of each component of the property.  Although independent appraisals may be used to assist in the determination of fair value, in many cases these values will be based upon management’s assessment of each property, the selling prices of comparable properties and the discounted value of cash flows from the asset.
 
 
Page 14 of 22
 
 

 

 
ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS.  (Continued)

The fair values of above market and below market in-place leases will be recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) an estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases measured over a period equal to the non-cancelable term of the lease including any bargain renewal periods.  The above market and below market lease values will be capitalized as intangible lease assets or liabilities.  Above market lease values will be amortized as an adjustment of rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.  Below market leases will be amortized as an adjustment of rental income over the remaining term of the respective leases, including any bargain renewal periods.  If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts of above market and below market in-place lease values relating to that lease would be recorded as an adjustment to rental income.

The fair values of in-place leases will include estimated direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant, and opportunity costs associated with lost rentals which are avoided by acquiring an in-place lease.  Direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant may include commissions, tenant improvements, and other direct costs and are estimated, in part, by management’s consideration of current market costs to execute a similar lease.  These direct costs will be included in intangible lease assets on the balance sheet and will be amortized to expense over the remaining term of the respective leases.  The value of opportunity costs will be calculated using the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases over a market absorption period for a similar lease.  These intangibles will be included in intangible lease assets on the balance sheet and will be amortized to expense over the remaining term of the respective leases.  If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts of in-place lease assets relating to that lease would be expensed.

The determination of the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired will require the use of significant assumptions with regard to the current market rental rates, rental growth rates, discount and capitalization rates, interest rates and other variables.  If management’s estimates or assumptions prove inaccurate, the result would be an inaccurate allocation of purchase price, which could impact the amount of reported net income.

Carrying Value of Properties

Properties are carried at original cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.  The Partnership tests long-lived assets for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.  For properties the Partnership will hold and operate, management determines whether impairment has occurred by comparing the property’s probability-weighted future undiscounted cash flows to its current carrying value.  For properties held for sale, management determines whether impairment has occurred by comparing the property’s estimated fair value less cost to sell to its current carrying value.  If the carrying value is greater than the net realizable value, an impairment loss is recorded to reduce the carrying value of the property to its net realizable value.  Changes in these assumptions or analysis may cause material changes in the carrying value of the properties.
 
 
Page 15 of 22
 
 

 

 
ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS.  (Continued)

Allocation of Expenses

AEI Fund Management, Inc. allocates expenses to each of the funds they manage primarily on the basis of the number of hours devoted by their employees to each fund’s affairs.  They also allocate expenses at the end of each month that are not directly related to a fund’s operations based upon the number of investors in the fund and the fund’s capitalization relative to other funds they manage.  The Partnership reimburses these expenses subject to detailed limitations contained in the Partnership Agreement.

Results of Operations

For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Partnership recognized rental income from continuing operations of $597,925 for both periods.  Based on the scheduled rent for the properties owned as of July 31, 2014, the Partnership expects to recognize rental income from continuing operations of approximately $1,196,000 in 2014.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Partnership incurred Partnership administration expenses from affiliated parties of $120,983 and $114,549, respectively.  These administration expenses include costs associated with the management of the properties, processing distributions, reporting requirements and communicating with the Limited Partners.  During the same periods, the Partnership incurred Partnership administration and property management expenses from unrelated parties of $44,820 and $37,406, respectively.  These expenses represent direct payments to third parties for legal and filing fees, direct administrative costs, outside audit costs, taxes, insurance and other property costs.

The Partnership owns a 40.1354% interest in a HomeTown Buffet restaurant in Albuquerque, New Mexico.  The remaining interests in this property are owned by unrelated third parties, who own the property with the Partnership as tenants-in-common.  On January 31, 2011, the lease term expired and the tenant returned possession of the property to the owners.  The owners listed the property for lease or sale with a real estate broker in the Albuquerque area.  While the property is vacant, the Partnership is responsible for its 40.1354% share of real estate taxes and other costs associated with maintaining the property.

Based on its long-lived asset valuation analysis, the Partnership determined the HomeTown Buffet restaurant was impaired.  As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2013, a charge to continuing operations for real estate impairment of $61,002 was recognized, which was the difference between the carrying value at December 31, 2013 of $336,002 and the estimated fair value of $275,000.  The charge was recorded against the cost of the land and building.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Partnership recognized interest income of $3,772 and $455, respectively.  In 2014, interest income increased primarily due to the Partnership having more money invested in a money market account due to property sales.
 
 
Page 16 of 22
 
 

 

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS.  (Continued)

Prior to January 1, 2014, upon complete disposal of a property or classification of a property as Real Estate Held for Sale, the Partnership included the operating results and sale of the property in discontinued operations.  In addition, the Partnership reclassified the prior periods’ operating results of the property to discontinued operations.  For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Partnership recognized income from discontinued operations of $515,675, representing rental income less property management expenses of $36,564 and gain on disposal of real estate of $479,111.  For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Partnership recognized income from discontinued operations of $100,413, representing rental income less property management expenses and depreciation.

During 2012, the Partnership decided to sell its 44% interest in the Champps Americana restaurant in Utica, Michigan and classified it as Real Estate Held for Sale.  In February 2013, Champps Operating Corporation (“Champps’), the tenant of the property, approached the Partnership with a request to adjust the rent on the property to a market rental rate based on the restaurant’s performance and the current conditions in the market.  In April 2013, after reviewing financial information for the restaurant and the tenant, and analyzing the local real estate market for the property, the Partnership and the property’s other co-owners entered into an agreement to reduce the annual rent for the property by 63% to $90,880.  The Partnership’s share of this rent was $39,987.  On December 15, 2013, Champps filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization.  In February 2014, Champps closed the restaurant, filed a motion with the bankruptcy court to reject the lease and returned possession of the property to the owners.  The owners listed the property for sale or lease with a real estate broker in the Utica area.  While the property is vacant, the Partnership is responsible for its 44% share of real estate taxes and other costs associated with maintaining the property.

Based on its long-lived asset valuation analysis, the Partnership determined the Champps property was impaired.  As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2013, a charge to discontinued operations for real estate impairment of $85,000 was recognized, which was the difference between the carrying value at December 31, 2013 of $733,000 and the estimated fair value of $648,000.  The charge was recorded against the cost of the land and building.

In June 2014, the Partnership and the other co-owners of the Champps property entered into an agreement to sell the property to an unrelated third party.  The sale is subject to contingencies and may not be completed.  If the sale is completed, the Partnership expects to receive net proceeds of approximately $705,000.  If the sale is not completed, the owners will seek another buyer for the property and may not be able to negotiate a purchase agreement with similar economic terms.
 
 
Page 17 of 22
 
 

 

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS.  (Continued)

In September 2013, the Partnership decided to sell the Royal Buffet restaurant in Colorado Springs, Colorado and classified it as Real Estate Held for Sale.  Based on its long-lived asset valuation analysis, the Partnership determined the Royal Buffet restaurant was impaired.  As a result, in the third quarter of 2013, a charge to discontinued operations for real estate impairment of $322,868 was recognized, which was the difference between the carrying value at September 30, 2013 of $642,868 and the estimated fair value of $320,000.  The charge was recorded against the cost of the land and building.  On December 20, 2013, the Partnership sold the property to an unrelated third party.  The Partnership received net sale proceeds of $339,514, which resulted in a net gain of $19,514.

On August 2, 2013, the Partnership sold its 40% interest in the Scott & White Clinic in College Station, Texas to an unrelated third party.  The Partnership received net sale proceeds of $1,869,225, which resulted in a net gain of $504,826.  At the time of sale, the cost and related accumulated depreciation was $1,470,224 and $105,825, respectively.

During the first six months of 2014, the Partnership sold 33.6574% of the Applebee’s restaurant in Sandusky, Ohio, in six separate transactions, to unrelated third parties.  The Partnership received total net sale proceeds of $1,231,221, which resulted in a net gain of $479,111.  The cost and related accumulated depreciation of the interests sold was $955,079 and $202,969, respectively.

Subsequent to June 30, 2014, the Partnership sold its remaining 11.3426% interest in the Applebee’s restaurant in Sandusky, Ohio, in two separate transactions, to unrelated third parties.  The Partnership received total net sale proceeds of approximately $412,000, which resulted in a net gain of approximately $158,500.  The cost and related accumulated depreciation of the interests sold was $321,864 and $68,401, respectively.  At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the property was classified as Real Estate Held for Sale with a carrying value of $253,463 and $1,005,573, respectively.

Management believes inflation has not significantly affected income from operations.  Leases may contain rent increases, based on the increase in the Consumer Price Index over a specified period, which will result in an increase in rental income over the term of the leases.  Inflation also may cause the real estate to appreciate in value.  However, inflation and changing prices may have an adverse impact on the operating margins of the properties' tenants, which could impair their ability to pay rent and subsequently reduce the Net Cash Flow available for distributions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Partnership's cash balances increased $1,025,536 as a result of cash generated from the sale of property, which was partially offset by cash used for distributions and redemption payments paid to the Partners in excess of cash generated from operating activities.  During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Partnership's cash balances decreased $120,304 as a result of cash used for distributions and redemption payments paid to the Partners in excess of cash generated from operating activities.
 
 
Page 18 of 22
 
 

 

 
ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS.  (Continued)

Net cash provided by operating activities increased from $558,282 in 2013 to $559,545 in 2014 as a result of net timing differences in the collection of payments from the tenants and the payment of expenses, which were partially offset by a decrease in total rental and interest income in 2014 and an increase in Partnership administration and property management expenses in 2014.

The major components of the Partnership's cash flow from investing activities are investments in real estate and proceeds from the sale of real estate.  During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Partnership generated cash flow from the sale of real estate of $1,231,221.

The Partnership's primary use of cash flow, other than investment in real estate, is distribution and redemption payments to Partners.  The Partnership declares its regular quarterly distributions before the end of each quarter and pays the distribution in the first week after the end of each quarter.  The Partnership attempts to maintain a stable distribution rate from quarter to quarter.  Redemption payments are paid to redeeming Partners on a semi-annual basis.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Partnership declared distributions of $594,942 and $599,400, respectively, which were distributed 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partners.  The Limited Partners received distributions of $588,992 and $593,407 and the General Partners received distributions of $5,950 and $5,993 for the periods, respectively.

As part of the distributions discussed above, the Partnership distributed net sale proceeds of $278,943 and $26,984 in 2014 and 2013, respectively.  The Limited Partners received distributions of $276,154 and $26,714 and the General Partners received distributions of $2,789 and $270 for the periods, respectively.  The Limited Partners’ distributions represented $13.04 and $1.24 per Unit for the periods, respectively.  The Partnership anticipates the remaining net sale proceeds will either be reinvested in additional property or distributed to the Partners in the future.

The Partnership may acquire Units from Limited Partners who have tendered their Units to the Partnership.  Such Units may be acquired at a discount.  The Partnership will not be obligated to purchase in any year any number of Units that, when aggregated with all other transfers of Units that have occurred since the beginning of the same calendar year (excluding Permitted Transfers as defined in the Partnership Agreement), would exceed 5% of the total number of Units outstanding on January 1 of such year.  In no event shall the Partnership be obligated to purchase Units if, in the sole discretion of the Managing General Partner, such purchase would impair the capital or operation of the Partnership.

On April 1, 2014, thirteen Limited Partners redeemed a total of 212.56 Partnership Units for $166,377 in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.  On April 1, 2013, fourteen Limited Partners redeemed a total of 95.13 Partnership Units for $78,402.  The Partnership acquired these Units using Net Cash Flow from operations.  The redemptions increase the remaining Limited Partners' ownership interest in the Partnership.  As a result of these redemption payments and pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the General Partners received distributions of $1,680 and $792 in 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Page 19 of 22
 
 

 
 
ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS.  (Continued)

The continuing rent payments from the properties, together with cash generated from property sales, should be adequate to fund continuing distributions and meet other Partnership obligations on both a short-term and long-term basis.

The Economy and Market Conditions

The impact of conditions in the economy over the last several years, including the turmoil in the credit markets, has adversely affected many real estate investment funds.  However, the absence of mortgage financing on the Partnership's properties eliminates the risks of foreclosure and debt-refinancing that can negatively impact the value and distributions of leveraged real estate investment funds.  Nevertheless, a prolonged economic downturn may adversely affect the operations of the Partnership's tenants and their cash flows.  If a tenant were to default on its lease obligations, the Partnership's income would decrease, its distributions would likely be reduced and the value of its properties might decline.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Partnership had no material off-balance sheet arrangements that had or are reasonably likely to have current or future effects on its financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE & QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not required for a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a)  Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its President and Chief Financial Officer, the Managing General Partner of the Partnership evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)).  Based upon that evaluation, the President and Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the President and Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner, in a manner that allows timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)  Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

During the most recent period covered by this report, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
Page 20 of 22
 
 

 
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Partnership is a party or of which the Partnership's property is subject.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS.

Not required for a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES & USE OF PROCEEDS.

(a) None.

(b) Not applicable.

(c) Pursuant to Section 7.7 of the Partnership Agreement, as amended, each Limited Partner has the right to present Units to the Partnership for purchase by submitting notice to the Managing General Partner during January or July of each year.  The purchase price of the Units is equal to 90% of the net asset value per Unit, as of the first business day of January or July of each year, as determined by the Managing General Partner in accordance with the provisions of the Partnership Agreement.  Units tendered to the Partnership during January and July are redeemed on April 1st and October 1st, respectively, of each year subject to the following limitations.  The Partnership will not be obligated to purchase in any year any number of Units that, when aggregated with all other transfers of Units that have occurred since the beginning of the same calendar year (excluding Permitted Transfers as defined in the Partnership Agreement), would exceed 5% of the total number of Units outstanding on January 1 of such year.  In no event shall the Partnership be obligated to purchase Units if, in the sole discretion of the Managing General Partner, such purchase would impair the capital or operation of the Partnership.

Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period
Total Number
of Units
Purchased
Average
Price Paid
per Unit
Total Number of Units
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
Maximum Number
of Units that May Yet
Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs
         
4/1/14 to 4/30/14
212.56
$782.72
2,845.14(1)
(2)
         
5/1/14 to 5/31/14
--
--
--
--
         
6/1/14 to 6/30/14
--
--
--
--

(1)  
The Partnership's repurchase plan is mandated by the Partnership Agreement as included in the prospectus related to the original offering of the Units.
(2)  
The Partnership Agreement contains annual limitations on repurchases described in the paragraph above and has no expiration date.
 

 
Page 21 of 22
 
 

 
 
ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS.

31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of General Partner pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a)(17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)) and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of General Partner pursuant to Rule 15d-14(a)(17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)) and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of General Partner pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Dated:  August 12, 2014
AEI Net Lease Income & Growth Fund XX
 
Limited Partnership
 
By:
AEI Fund Management XX, Inc.
 
Its:
Managing General Partner
     
     
     
 
By:
  /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
   
Robert P. Johnson
   
President
   
(Principal Executive Officer)
     
     
     
 
By:
 /s/ PATRICK W KEENE 
   
Patrick W. Keene
   
Chief Financial Officer
   
(Principal Accounting Officer)


 
Page 22 of 22