Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x      QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

o         TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                        to              

Commission file number 333-141690

KABE EXPLORATION INC.

(Name registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (858) 699-1359

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x  No o

Number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of November 19 2013: 129,741,893shares of Common Stock

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.        Financial Statements.

KABE EXPLORATION, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Condensed Balance Sheets

The accompanying notes are an integreal part of these financial statements

1

Table of Contents

KABE EXPLORATION, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Condensed Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integreal part of these financial statements

2

Table of Contents

KABE EXPLORATION, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integreal part of these financial statements

3

Table of Contents

1. ORGANIZATION

Kabe Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada December 16, 2005.  The company was originally formed for mineral exploration in the United States.  The Company abandoned its Mineral Leases in 2008.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

These interim condensed financial statements as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to fairly state the Company’s financial position and the results of its operations for the periods presented in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. All adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

These interim condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s fiscal year end December 31, 20`12 report on Form 10-K. The Company assumes that the users of the interim financial information herein have read, or have access to, the audited financial statements for the preceding period, and that the adequacy of additional disclosure needed for a fair presentation may be determined in that context. The results of operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year ending December 31, 2013.

Development Stage Activities

The Company complies with Financial Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC’) 915 and Securities and Exchange Commission Act Guide 7 for its characterization of the company as a development stage enterprise.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase that are readily convertible into cash to be cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no cash equivalents.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair value of financial instruments

The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASC (Accounting Standards Codification) 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” for financial assets and liabilities. FASB ASC 820-10 provides a framework for measuring fair value and requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value

4

Table of Contents

measurements.  FASB ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.  FASB ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available. The following summarizes the three levels of inputs required by the standard that the Company uses to measure fair value:

·                                          Level 1:  Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

·                                          Level 2:  Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities.

·                                          Level 3:  Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

All of the Company’s financial instruments are recorded at fair value due to their term of maturity.

Income taxes

The Company utilizes FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes” which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.  Valuation allowances are established if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

Net Loss per share is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260, “ Loss per Share.” Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements” (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting. The objective of ASU No. 2013-07 is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting and to provide principles for the measurement of assets and liabilities under the liquidation basis of accounting, as well as any required disclosures. The amendments in this standard are effective prospectively for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during

5

Table of Contents

annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. We are evaluating the effect, if any, adoption of ASU No. 2013-07 will have on our financial statements.

Reclassification of Prior Year Amounts

Certain prior year amounts were reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

Going Concern

The Company’s condensed interim financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.  However, the Company has not generated a sustainable source of income and has a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $686,613at September 30, 2013.

In view of the matter described above, recoverability of a major portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying balance sheets is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital, obtain financing and to succeed in its future operations.  The condensed interim financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management has taken the following steps to revise its operating and financial requirements, which it believes are sufficient to provide the Company with the ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company is actively pursuing additional funding by raising capital and potential merger or acquisition candidates to redirect the structure and management to new profitable activities. The Company is also seeking strategic partners, which would enhance stockholders’ investment. Management believes that the above actions will allow the Company to continue operations through this fiscal year. However, there is no assurance the Company will be successful in this regard.

3. RELATED PARTIES TRANSACTIONS

Related Party Loan:  Chapman Industries

Chapman Industries is an entity wholly owned by the Company President, Erik UlsteenChapman Industries advanced a series of working capital loans to the Company for expenses including PR services, consulting fees, and office rent.  The aggregate of loans bears an interest rate of 6%, is unsecured, has no terms of repayment, is payable on demand and has no maturity date.

6

Table of Contents

4. LOAN PAYABLE

On June 19, 2013, the Company issued a promissory note for $500,000 to JMJ Financial , a Massachusetts limited liability corporation. As of September 30, 2013, JMJ Financial has advanced the Company only $50,000 of the promissory note for $250,000. As of September 30, 2013, the Company is only obligated for $50,000 of the promissory note.  The note exhibits the following terms:

a.        Effective Date is the date following the execution date (June 19, 2013) and delivery of the first payment.

b.        Zero percent interest for the first three months.

c.         Loan may be repaid on or before the first 90 days.

d.        Thereafter, loan payments prior to the maturity date may not be made without written approval of the Lender.

e.         Interest rate remains at zero percent if the loan is repaid within the first 90 days.

f.          If the loan is not repaid within the first 90 days, a one-time interest charge of 12% is applied to the principal sum, designated as OID (original issue discount).

g.         Interest on the loan is in addition to the OID.

h.        The loan maturity date is June 19, 2014, one year from the effective date.

i.            The principal sum is the consideration actually paid plus OID plus interest and fees payable.

j.           The principal sum may be converted to common stock at any time after the effective date at the rate of the lesser of $0.015 per share, or 60% of the lowest trade price in the 25 days previous to the conversion.

k.        Other conditions apply.

5. DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

The JMJ Financial loan described in Note 4 contains an embedded derivative that creates a risk of loss based on the trading price of the Company:  The principal of the loan is convertible into common stock at the will of the lender at any time within one year of the “Effective Date”.  The conversion price is described as the lesser of $0.015 per share, or 60% of the lowest trading price in the 25 days preceding the conversion.

The lender has funded the Company’s $500,000 promissory note described in Note 4 with $50,000 as at June 20, 2013.  The derivative provides an incentive to further fund the note within the term. The embedded conversion feature of this note was recorded as a derivative liability due to the down-round protection of the conversion prices as there is no floor on the conversion prices.

The fair value of the derivative liability on the effective date of the loan, June 19, 2013, and at the period end, September 30, 2013 is:

6. STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

On March 31, 2013, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock for services at $0.03 per share.  An expense of $45,000 was recorded.

7

Table of Contents

On April 17, 2013, the Company issued 480,000 shares of common stock for directors fees at $0.03 per share.  An expense of $14,400 was recorded.

On May 31, 2013, the Company issued 950,000 shares of common stock for services at $0.02 per share.  An expense of $19,000 was recorded.

On June 26, 2013, the Company issued 2,857,143 shares of common stock for $50,000 cash at $0.0018 per share.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Except as otherwise required by the context, all references in this prospectus to “we”, “us”, “our”, or “Company” refer to the operations of Kabe Exploration Inc., a Nevada corporation.

Forward-Looking Statements and Associated Risks

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for certain forward-looking statements. Some of the statements contained in this annual report of the Company discuss future expectations, contain projections of our operations or financial condition or state other forward-looking information. Some statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts (including without limitation statements to the effect that we “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “foresee,” or other similar expressions) and are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on us. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those anticipated by us. All comments concerning our expectations for future revenue and operating results are based on our forecasts of our plan of operation and do not include the potential impact of any future acquisitions or operations. These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

Overview

During 2007, we were an exploration stage company engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. We entered into a lease agreement with George J. Eliopulos effective March 31, 2006, granting us the exclusive right to explore, develop, and mine the property for gold, silver, copper and other valuable minerals.  The property consisted of one unpatented mining claim located in section 12, Township 16 North, Range 20 East, Mt. Diablo Baseline & Meridian, Storey County, Nevada, USA, owned by Mr. Eliopulos.

On December 18, 2007, Erik Ulsteen entered into an agreement with Antony Claydon, our former President and a director and Rory Moss, a director, to purchase 1,500,000 and 250,000 shares of

8

Table of Contents

common stock, respectively, for an aggregate purchase price of $50,000. The transaction closed on February 14, 2008 at which time, Mr. Claydon resigned as President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary and Mr. Ulsteen was appointed President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and director.  On January 28, 2008, we terminated our lease agreement with Mr. Eliopulos.

On February 21, 2013, we purchased 320 mineral lease acres in Butler County Kansas representing a 81% Net Revenue Interest, or NRI. We plan to drill shallow wells 3300-6000 ft. on a turnkey basis, which is a very low cost drilling program. We hope to achieve production of approx. 100-200 barrels per day, or BPD, for each well and we plan to drill 1 well initially and up to 7 wells if results from the first one are positive.   We are currently in a pre-production phase and are gearing up towards full production development. Drilling might commence sooner based on funding received.

The following factors raise substantial doubt regarding the ability of our business to continue as a going concern: (i) the losses we have incurred since our inception; (ii) our failure to generate revenues since our inception; and (iii) our dependence on the sale of our equity securities and on the receipt of capital from outside sources to continue our operations. Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion regarding our business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the uncertainty about our ability to continue in business. As such we may have to cease operations and you could lose your investment.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2012

Revenues

We have generated no operating revenues from operations from our inception.

Costs and Expenses

From our inception through  September 30, 2013, we have incurred cumulative losses of $ $686,613.  Professional fees increased to $ 5,250 for the three months ended  September 30, 2013 from $ 2,525 for the three months ended September 30 , 2012. Consulting fees  decrease  to  $5,000 for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2013 from $40,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Other Administrative expenses  decrease to  $2,033 for the three months ended  September 30,2013 from $ 2,440 for the three months ended ,  September 30, 2013.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

Revenues

We have generated no operating revenues from operations from our inception.

9

Table of Contents

Costs and Expenses

Professional fees  increased to $ 13,335 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $ 7,455for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.  Consulting fees increased to $ 69,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from       $ 40,000for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.  Other Administrative expenses increased to $ 92,104 for the nine months ended  September 30, 2013 from $ $ 6,915for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2013, we had a working capital t of $35,400 as compared to a working capital deficit  of $  41,367 as of December 31, 2012.  Our cash position was $ $369,983  as of September 30, 2013 compared to $138 as of December 31, 2012.  We have financed our company principally through the private placement of our common stock.  As of September 30, 2013, we have no long term debt.

On June 19, 2013, the Company issued a promissory note for $500,000 to JMJ Financial, a Massachusetts limited liability corporation. As of September 30, 2013, JMJ Financial  has advanced the Company only  $50,000 of the promissory note for $250,000. As of September 30, 2013, the Company is only obligated for $50,000 of the promissory note.  The note exhibits the following terms:

a.              Effective Date is the date following the execution date (June 19, 2013) and delivery of the first payment.

b.              Zero percent interest for the first three months.

c.               Loan may be repaid on or before the first 90 days.

d.              Thereafter, loan payments prior to the maturity date may not be made without written approval of the Lender.

e.               Interest rate remains at zero percent if the loan is repaid within the first 90 days.

f.                If the loan is not repaid within the first 90 days, a one-time interest charge of 12% is applied to the principal sum, designated as OID (original issue discount).

g.               Interest on the loan is in addition to the OID.

h.              The loan maturity date is June 19, 2014, one year from the effective date.

i.                  The principal sum is the consideration actually paid plus OID plus interest and fees payable.

j.                 The principal sum may be converted to common stock at any time after the effective date at the rate of the lesser of $0.015 per share, or 60% of the lowest trade price in the 25 days previous to the conversion.

k.              Other conditions apply.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Our financial statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.  Because a precise determination of many assets and liabilities is dependent upon future events, the preparation of

10

Table of Contents

financial statements for a period necessarily involves the use of estimates which have been made using careful judgment.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Significant estimates made by management are, among others, realizability of long-lived assets, deferred taxes and stock option valuation.

The financial statements have, in management’s opinion, been properly prepared within the reasonable limits of materiality and within the framework of the significant accounting.

Income Taxes

We utilize SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.  Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. We generated a deferred tax credit through net operating loss carryforward.  However, a valuation allowance of 100% has been established, as the realization of the deferred tax credits is not reasonably certain, based on going concern considerations outlined as follows.

Going Concern

Our financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.  We have not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover our operating costs and to allow us to continue as a going concern.   Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on us obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until we become profitable.  If we are unable to obtain adequate capital, we could be forced to cease operations.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to successfully accomplish our plan to develop a new business plan, or merger candidate in order to eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations.  The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amount and classifications or liabilities or other adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

11

Table of Contents

Development-Stage Company

We are considered a development-stage company, with limited operating revenues during the periods presented, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 7.  SFAS.  No. 7 requires companies to report their operations, shareholders deficit and cash flows since inception through the date that revenues are generated from management’s intended operations, among other things.  Management has defined inception as January 1, 2006. Since inception until September 30, 2013, we have incurred an operating loss of $686,631.  Our working capital has been generated through sales of common stock.  Management has provided financial data since January 1, 2006, “Inception” in the financial statements, as a means to provide readers of our financial information to make informed investment decisions.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with SFAS 128, Earnings Per Share for the period presented.  Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted net loss per share is based on the assumption that all dilative convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised.  Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method.  Under this method, options and warrants are assumed exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby we used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.

We had no potentially dilutive securities outstanding as of September 30, 2013.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our stockholders.

Item 4    Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We evaluated the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures to determine whether they are effective in ensuring that we disclose required information in a timely manner and in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC.  The executive who serves as our President and Chief Financial Officer has participated in such evaluation.  Management concluded, based on such review, that our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  The ineffectiveness of these disclosure controls is due to the matters described below in “Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”

12

Table of Contents

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

We believe that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the control system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.  Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and our President and Chief Financial Officer has concluded that such controls and procedures are not effective at the “reasonable assurance” level.  The ineffectiveness of these disclosure controls is due to the matters described below in “Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act. Management assessed the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting as of  September 30, 2013, using the framework set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this assessment, our management concluded that, as of September 30, 2013, the internal controls over financial reporting were not effective. The reportable conditions and material weakness relate to a limited segregation of duties. Segregation of duties within our company is limited due to the small number of employees that are assigned to positions that involve the processing of financial information. Specifically, certain key financial accounting and reporting personnel had an expansive scope of duties that allowed for the creation, review, approval and processing of financial data without independent review and authorization for preparation of schedules and resulting financial statements and related disclosures. We did not maintain a sufficient depth of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the selection and application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles commensurate with financial reporting requirements. Accordingly, we place undue reliance on the finance team at corporate headquarters, specifically the executive who is our President and Chief Financial Officer along with outside accounting consulting. Accordingly, management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness. This material weakness could result in material misstatements of significant accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to our interim or annual financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. In addition, due to limited staffing, we are not always able to detect minor errors or omissions in reporting.

Going forward, management anticipates that additional staff will be necessary to mitigate these weaknesses, as well as to implement other planned improvements.  Additional staff will enable us to document and apply transactional and periodic controls procedures, permit a better review and approval process and improve quality of financial reporting.  However, the potential addition of new staff is contingent on obtaining additional financing, and there is no assurance that we will be able to do so.

Changes in Internal Control Over financial Reporting

Management believes that its unaudited condensed financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 fairly presented, in all material respects, its financial condition and results of operations.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, there were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

13

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 1.                      Legal Proceedings.

We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding, nor is our property the subject of a pending legal proceeding, that is not in the ordinary course of business or otherwise material to the financial condition of our business.

Item 6.                      Exhibits.

14

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

15