(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No[ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K ( § 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company filer. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 28, 2013: $4,913,125
The number of shares of the registrants common stock outstanding as of August 15, 2013: 42,475,000.
Massive Dynamics, Inc. (the Company, we, us, our) was formed as a Nevada corporation on March 15, 2011. Initially we planned to be a shell company seeking a business combination and, in furtherance of that plan, we filed a Form 10-12G with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2011. That Form 10-12G was amended and we are now a 12G reporting company subject to the rules of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. On July 11, 2011, we entered into a Services Agreement (the SA) with Horizon Tower, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that operates communications towers. The SA marked our ceasing to be a shell company and our entering into the business of providing engineering, compliance and other services to communications tower operators as well as operating our own towers and Form 10 information was included in our S-1 Registration Statement filed on September 14, 2011.
On August 20, 2012, Kylemore Corp. (Kylemore) purchased 4,941,125 shares (the Control Shares) of the Companys common stock from its then controlling shareholders. Upon the conclusion of the acquisition the Control Shares, Kylemore became the controlling shareholder of the Company by virtue of its ownership of approximately 90% of our issued and outstanding common stock.
On April 16, 2013, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Real-View 3D (RV3D), a New York corporation. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement on May 7, 2013 the Company issued 15,000,000 shares of its common stock to Jonathan J Howard, founder of (RV3D), and Kylemore Corp. agreed to return 25,000,000
shares of Common Stock to the Company for cancellation. As a result Mr. Howard became the controlling shareholder of approximately 37.5% of our issued and outstanding common stock.
With our acquisition of the assets of RV3D, we have changed the focus of our business from providing engineering and compliance to communications tower operators to 3D imaging. RV3D is an image capture product company that has developed and is committed to design, patent, manufacture and market 3D imaging Z-axis capture products for the consumer computer peripherals market. We acquired certain 3D imaging technologies from RV3D in return for 15,000,000 restricted shares of the Companys common stock. With this recent acquisition, our focus has changed from operating communicating towers to marketing 3D imaging and Z-axis products.
At March 31, 2013, we had a working capital deficit of $370,886 and a stockholders' deficit of $346,192. Our independent registered auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their opinion on our financial statements for the periods from inception on March 15, 2012 through March 31, 2013 that states that this lack of resources causes substantial doubt about ability to continue as a going concern. No assurances can be given that we will generate sufficient revenue or obtain necessary financing to continue as a going concern.
Our executive offices are located at 1057 East Henrietta Rd, Rochester, New York 14623, and our telephone number is 800-962-5250.
With the acquisition of the assets of RV3D, we entered the 3D printing business.
We have developed technology around an imaging technology known as "structured light" that allows for the rapid capture and processing of the digital signal capture 3D images of objects or real time 3D video of a desired target. Utilizing Structured light technology, an object is first placed on a rotating stage that is marked in the edge in degrees for calibration. The subject is then rotated and an initial 360 degree texture image (picture) is taken, followed by the taking of a structured light image in the same manner. A structured light image is a calibrated grid of lines that is projected on the subject. These projected lines deviate as they fall over the subject. An image of these lines is captured. Real View 3D software can extract Z-axis data from these line deviations and a topographical map is created. To image a complete subject, the subject is rotated 360 degrees for the image and then another 360 degree rotation for capturing the structured light for the Z axis map information. The resulting Z axis map and the image are then fused into a 360 degree renderable image. This image can then be exported into many other formats for viewing.
The 3D marketplace is just emerging. Developing 3D content is in the critical path. Massive Dynamics will strive to be a preeminent developer of this technology for the consumer, industrial, social media and medical marketplace. Our intent is to penetrate it by developing core technology competencies and acquiring complementary technologies, thus enabling us to rapidly react and deliver a variety of products to this dynamic marketplace.
Our primary business will be to develop and market 3D scanning, capture, rendering, and printing products to the following markets: consumer, commercial, industrial, and medical. These products will be utilized for e-commerce in developing content for online catalogs, manuals, and online stores such as E-Bay. Our product will be user friendly. We envision a one click solution for capturing. One example would be to scan and capture an item for your E-Bay store, replacing several pictures with a single renderable image enabling the viewer to utilize their mouse to scroll and position view from any desired angle. Commercial applications are graphic artists, industrial arts, web content development, and developing content for the 3D printer market as well as applications in social media. In the medical market, it would be utilized in the operating room in hospitals as well as dental office applications. Our price points will vary from low cost solutions for the consumer marketplace to higher end products for industrial and medical applications.
We are located in a research and development center in Rochester, New York. Rochester is the headquarters of several large companies with optics and imaging technologies, such as Kodak, Xerox, Bausch & Lomb and others. The Rochester Institute of Technology and the University of Rochester have world renowned optical engineering and medical programs from which to draw resources.
Planned Growth Strategy
We plan to develop our 3D scanning technology with a minimum cost structure and have our products in the market within six months of receiving the necessary funding of $300,000. We plan on receiving the needed funding by issuing convertible promissory notes and other sources.
We intend to develop additional products from the proceeds of our initial products. We plan to continue to pursue this technology and develop a suite of 3D medical cameras utilized in laparoscopic surgery. We plan to use the profits from this initial product offering to continue innovations and adding to our product roadmap. We intend on having our own branded product as well as continuing research on our innovative disposable 3D laparoscopic cancer detecting camera system.
Although there are many companies in the industry, our major competitors are Next Engine, 3D Digital Corp., and Ortery.
Mr. Jonathan J. Howard is the Chief Executive Officer and sole director of the Company. Mr. Howard will serve on an as needed basis, but may devote some of his time to other ventures. We believe we will be able to meet most of our needs through consultants and independent contractors.
Our office is located at 1057 East Henrietta Rd., Suite D3, Rochester, NY 14623. The office is 144 square feet and the monthly rent is $300.
We are not party to any legal proceedings.
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS.
This report includes forward-looking statements about our business and results of operations that are subject to risks and uncertainties. See "Forward-Looking Statements," above. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed below. We have discussed all known material risks below, however, we may also be subject to additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial. If any of these known or unknown risks or uncertainties actually occur, our business could be harmed substantially.
Risks Related to the Business
Our independent auditors' report includes an explanatory paragraph stating that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
We have negative working capital and a stockholders' deficit of $346,192 at March 31, 2013. Our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their opinion on our financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 that states that this lack of resources causes substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. No assurances can be given that we will generate sufficient revenue or obtain necessary financing to continue as a going concern.
We are and will continue to be completely dependent on the services of our founder and president, Jonathan Howard, the loss of whose services may cause our business operations to cease, and we will need to engage and retain qualified employees and consultants to further implement our strategy.
Our proposed business strategy is completely dependent upon the knowledge and business connections of Mr. Howard. He is under no contractual obligation to remain employed by us. If he should choose to leave us for any reason or if he becomes ill and is unable to work for an extended period of time before we have hired additional personnel, our operations will likely fail. Even if we are able to find additional personnel, it is uncertain whether we could find someone who could develop our business
We may incur substantial costs enforcing or acquiring intellectual property rights and defending against third party claims as a result of litigation or other proceedings.
In connection with the enforcement of our own intellectual property rights, the acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights or disputes related to the validity or alleged infringement of third party intellectual property rights, including patent rights, we have been, are currently and may in the future be subject to claims, negotiations or complex, protracted litigation. Intellectual property disputes and litigation may be costly and can be disruptive to our business operations by diverting attention and energies of management and key technical personnel, and by increasing our costs of doing business. Although we have successfully defended or resolved past litigation and disputes, we may not prevail in any ongoing or future litigation and disputes.
Third party intellectual property claims asserted against us could subject us to significant liabilities, require us to enter into royalty and licensing arrangements on unfavorable terms, prevent us from assembling or licensing certain of our products, subject us to injunctions restricting our sale of products, cause severe disruptions to our operations or the marketplaces in which we compete, or require us to satisfy indemnification commitments with our customers including contractual provisions under various license arrangements. In addition we may incur significant costs in acquiring the necessary third-party intellectual property rights for use in our products. Any of these could seriously harm our business.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights, including our digital content, from third-party infringers or unauthorized copying, use or disclosure.
Although we defend our intellectual property rights and endeavor to combat unlicensed copying and use of our digital content and intellectual property rights through a variety of techniques, preventing unauthorized use or infringement of our rights is inherently difficult. If our intellectual property becomes subject to piracy attacks, they may harm our business.
Additionally, we endeavor to protect the secrecy of our digital content, confidential information and trade secrets. If unauthorized disclosure of our trade secrets occurs, we could potentially lose trade secret protection. The loss of trade secret protection could make it easier for third parties to compete with our products by copying previously confidential features, which could adversely affect our revenue and operating margins. We also seek to protect our confidential information and trade secrets through the use of non-disclosure agreements. However there is a risk that our confidential information and trade secrets may be disclosed or published without our authorization, and in these situations it may be difficult and/or costly for us to enforce our rights.
We face significant competition in many aspects of our business, which could cause our revenue and gross profit margins to decline. Competition could also cause us to reduce sales prices or to incur additional marketing or production costs, which could result in decreased revenue, increased costs and reduced margins.
We compete for customers with a wide variety of producers of equipment for models, prototypes, other three-dimensional objects and end-use parts as well as producers of print materials and services for this equipment. Some of our existing and potential competitors are researching, designing, developing and marketing other types of competitive equipment, print materials and services. Many of these competitors have financial, marketing, manufacturing, distribution and other resources substantially greater than ours.
We also expect that future competition may arise from the development of allied or related techniques for equipment and print materials that are not encompassed by our patents, from the issuance of patents to other companies that
may inhibit our ability to develop certain products, and from improvements to existing print materials and equipment technologies.
We intend to continue to follow a strategy of continuing product development to enhance our position to the extent practicable. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our current position in the field or continue to compete successfully against current and future sources of competition. If we do not keep pace with technological change and introduce new products, we may lose revenue and demand for our products.
We are subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act that requires us to incur audit fees and legal fees in connection with the preparation of such reports. These additional costs could reduce or eliminate our ability to earn a profit.
We are required to file periodic reports with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. In order to comply with these requirements, our independent registered public accounting firm will have to review our financial statements on a quarterly basis and audit our financial statements on an annual basis. Moreover, our legal counsel will have to review and assist in the preparation of such reports. The costs charged by these professionals for such services cannot be accurately predicted at this time because factors such as the number and type of transactions that we engage in and the complexity of our reports cannot be determined at this time and will have a major effect on the amount of time to be spent by our auditors and attorneys. However, the incurrence of such costs will obviously be an expense to our operations and thus have a negative effect on our ability to meet our overhead requirements and earn a profit. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our common stock, if a market ever develops, could drop significantly.
We cannot assure you that we will generate sufficient revenues from operations or from other financing sources to execute our business plan and to meet the costs of being public.
Jonathan Howard, our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and principal accounting officer has limited experience managing a public company and no meaningful accounting or financial reporting education or experience and, accordingly, our ability to meet Exchange Act reporting requirements on a timely basis will be dependent to a significant degree upon others.
Jonathan Howard has limited experience managing a public company and no meaningful financial reporting education or experience. He is and will be heavily dependent on engaging and dealing with outside professional advisors, primarily lawyers and financial advisors/accountants who are and will not be affiliated with our independent auditors. We have no formal arrangements with professionals to help Mr. Howard and cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to establish arrangements with professionals on terms or costs that are acceptable or affordable to us.
Our internal controls will be inadequate until we hire additional personnel, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and/or directors of the Company; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Due to our only having one officer we will be unable to segregate duties and provide for checks and balances. Accordingly, our internal controls will be inadequate or ineffective, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public. Investors relying upon this misinformation may make an uninformed investment decision.
Having only one director limits our ability to establish effective independent corporate governance procedures and increases the control of our president over operations and business decisions.
We have only one director who is also our principal executive officer. Accordingly, we cannot establish board committees comprised of independent members to oversee functions like compensation or audit issues.
Until we have a larger board of directors that would include some independent members, if ever, there will be limited oversight of our president's decisions and activities and little ability for minority shareholders to challenge or reverse those activities and decisions, even if they are not in the best interests of minority shareholders.
Jonathan Howard, our CEO and president, has made and will make all decisions concerning his compensation. These decisions may not be in the best interests of other investors.
Mr. Howard does not have a written employment agreement at this time. He will make all decisions about the timing and amount of his compensation until, if ever, we have a sufficient number of directors to establish a compensation committee of the board of directors. Mr. Howards decisions about his compensation may not be in the best interests of other shareholders.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Shareholders may be diluted significantly through our efforts to obtain financing and satisfy obligations through issuance of additional shares of our common stock.
We have no committed source of financing. Wherever possible, our board of directors will attempt to use non-cash consideration to satisfy obligations. In many instances, we believe that the non-cash consideration will consist of restricted shares of our common stock. Our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the shareholders, to issue all or part of the remaining shares of common stock from the 75,000,000 authorized.
In addition, if a trading market develops for our common stock, we may attempt to raise capital by selling shares of our common stock, possibly at a discount to market. These actions will result in dilution of the ownership interests of existing shareholders may further dilute common stock book value, and that dilution may be material.
The interests of shareholders may be hurt because we can issue shares of our common stock to individuals or entities that support existing management with such issuances serving to enhance existing management's ability to maintain control of our Company.
Our CEO and president owns a significant portion of the outstanding shares of the Company. In addition, our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the shareholders, to issue all or part of the authorized but unissued common shares. Such issuances may be issued to parties or entities committed to supporting existing management and the interests of existing management which may not be the same as the interests of other shareholders. Although transactions, other than those described in this prospectus, are not currently being contemplated or discussed, our ability to issue shares without shareholder approval serves to enhance existing management's ability to maintain control of our Company or participate in other transactions, including entering into possible business combinations, without the support of other shareholders.
Nevada law provides for indemnification of officers and directors at our expense and limits their liability. These provisions may result in a major cost to us and hurt the interests of our shareholders because corporate resources may be expended for the benefit of officers and/or directors.
Nevada law contains substantial provisions for the indemnification of corporate officers and directors acting on behalf of the corporation and our Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws do not limit this right and obligation to indemnify.
Currently, there is a limited trading market for our securities. We cannot predict how liquid the market for our common stock might become.
Our stock is quoted on the OTCQB quotation service operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. under the symbol MSSD. The prices and trading volumes of stocks quoted on the OTCQB tend to be volatile. As a result, you may have difficulty selling your stock due to large swings in price or trading volume.
Our shares are eligible to be traded electronically, however, we could lose our eligibility to be electronically traded at any time, which would result in brokerage firms being unwilling to trade our shares.
We are eligible with the Depository Trust Company (DTC) to permit our shares to trade electronically. However, there is no assurance that we will maintain our DTC eligibility. If an issuer is not "DTC-eligible," then its shares cannot be electronically transferred between brokerage accounts, which, based on the realities of the marketplace as it exists today, means that shares of a company will not be traded. Shares of non-DTC eligible companies can be traded manually between accounts; however, this process takes days and is not a realistic option for companies relying on broker-dealers for stock transactions. As a result, if we lose our DTC eligibility, it will be more difficult and more expensive to buy or sell shares of our stock, which could affect the price and liquidity of our stock.
Any market that develops in shares of our common stock will be subject to the penny stock regulations and restrictions pertaining to low priced stocks that will create a lack of liquidity and make trading difficult or impossible.
Our shares of common stock are considered "penny stock." Rule 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act establishes the definition of a penny stock, for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a minimum bid price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a limited number of exceptions which are not available to us. This classification will severely and adversely affects any market liquidity for our common stock.
The market for penny stocks has experienced numerous frauds and abuses that could adversely impact investors in our stock.
Company management believes that the market for penny stocks has suffered from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include:
Control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer;
Manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;
Boiler room practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by sales persons;
Excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and
Wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.
We do not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock at any time in the foreseeable future. The future payment of dividends directly depends upon our future earnings, capital requirements, financial requirements and other factors that our board of directors will consider. Since we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock, return on your investment, if any, will depend solely on an increase, if any, in the market value of our common stock.
Because we are not subject to compliance with rules requiring the adoption of certain corporate governance measures, our stockholders have limited protection against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rule changes proposed and enacted by the SEC, the New York and American Stock Exchanges and the NASDAQ Stock Market, as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley, require the implementation of various measures relating to corporate governance. These measures are designed to enhance the integrity of corporate management and the securities markets and apply to securities that are listed on those exchanges or the NASDAQ Stock Market. Because we are not presently required to comply with many of the corporate governance provisions and because we chose to avoid incurring the substantial additional costs associated with such compliance any sooner than legally required, we have not yet adopted these measures.
Because our sole director is not an independent director, we do not currently have independent audit or compensation committees. As a result, our sole director has the ability, among other things, to determine his own level of compensation. Until we comply with such corporate governance measures, regardless of whether such compliance is required, the absence of such standards of corporate governance may leave our stockholders without protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest, if any, and similar matters and investors may be reluctant to provide us with funds necessary to expand our operations.
We intend to comply with all corporate governance measures relating to director independence as and when required. However, we may find it very difficult or be unable to attract and retain qualified officers, directors and members of board committees required to provide for our effective management as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has resulted in a series of rules and regulations by the SEC that increase responsibilities and liabilities of directors and executive officers. The perceived increased personal risk associated with these recent changes may make it more costly or deter qualified individuals from accepting these roles.
For all of the foregoing reasons and others set forth herein, an investment in our securities in any market that may develop in the future involves a high degree of risk.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
Our office is located at 1057 East Henrietta Rd., Suite D3, Rochester, NY 14623. The office is 144 square feet and the monthly rent is $300.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
We currently have no legal proceedings pending nor have any legal proceeding been threatened against us or any of our officers, directors or control persons of which we are aware.
The source of the above information is Yahoo Finance and OTCmarkets.com.
(1) On June 18, 2013, the Company approved its 2013 Stock Plan for Directors, Officers and Consultants (2013 Stock Plan). The 2013 Stock Plan authorized the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock for directors, officers, and employees (including consultants meeting the definition of employee under Rule 405 promulgated under the Securities Act). Pursuant to the 2013 Stock Plan, the Company registered 5,000,000 shares of its stock with the SEC on Form S-8 on June 18, 2013. The 2013 Stock Plan does not state an exercise price, and therefore, the par value of the Companys common stock has been used. Of the 5,000,000 shares authorized under the 2013 Stock Plan, 2,475,000 have been issued.
On June 29, 2012, the Company issued 9,422,500 shares of common stock to Globex Transfer LLC for an equivalent of $20,000 for professional services rendered towards DTC filing and eligibility services.
On May 7, 2013, the Company issued 15,000,000 shares of its common stock to Jonathan J Howard for purchase of the RV3D assets.
Because the Company is a smaller reporting company, it is not required to provide the information required by this Item 6.
We were founded as a Nevada corporation on March 15, 2011. The incorporation effort included the Company issuing 100,000,000 shares (post-split equivalent) of common stock to our founders.
Our independent registered auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their opinion on our financial statements for the period from inception on March 15, 2011 through March 31, 2013 that states that this lack of resources causes substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. To maintain operations as a going concern,
we are keeping day-to-day operating costs to a minimum and seeking leads for new revenue opportunities. We hope that we raise sufficient capital through operations and financing activities to dispel such concerns and qualifications.
We have developed technology around an imaging technology known as "structured light" that allows for the rapid capture and processing of the digital signal capture 3D images of objects or real time 3D video of a desired target. Utilizing Structured light technology, an object is first placed on a rotating stage that is marked in the edge in degrees for calibration. The subject is then rotated and an initial 360 degree texture image (picture) is taken, followed by the taking of a structured light image in the same manner. A structured light image is a calibrated grid of lines that is projected on the subject. These projected lines deviate as they fall over the subject. An image of these lines is captured. Real View 3D software can extract Z-axis data from these line deviations and a topographical
map is created. To image a complete subject, the subject is rotated 360 degrees for the image and then another 360 degree rotation for capturing the structured light for the Z axis map information. The resulting Z axis map and the image are then fused into a 360 degree renderable image. This image can then be exported into many other formats for viewing.
Results of Operations
Revenue decreased from $5,000 in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 to $-0- in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. Subsequent to March 31, 2013, the Company has discontinued its tower operating business and entered into the 3D printing business. We are unsure of the revenues that the Company may generate from the 3D printing business, if any.
Expenses of operation increased in the year ended March 31, 2013 as compared to March 31, 2012 from $22,795 to $347,908. This increase was due to the write-off of bad debt in the amount of $121,649, an increase in office and general expenses from $931 to $71,550, website design cost of $45,900, and an increase in professional fees. The increase in expenses is due to the shift in the focus of the Company from providing engineering and compliance to communications tower operators to 3D imaging. The Company also incurred interest expense of $13,558 in 2013 versus $-0- in interest expense in 2012.
Our net loss increased from $17,795 in 2012 to $361,466 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. This loss was mainly due to the increase in expenses noted above.
As of March 31, 2013, we had total assets of $53,402, including liquid assets of $28,708. As of March 31, 2012, we had no assets. We had an accumulated deficit of $387,046 and current liabilities of $399,594 at March 31, 2013. We had an accumulated deficit of $25,580 and current liabilities of $20,580 at March 31, 2012.
We have an agreement with Infinite Funding, Inc. (Infinite) whereby we can borrow up to $500,000 by putting promissory notes to Infinite. At March 31, 2013, we had borrowed $365,000 under this agreement. These loans have a maturity of one year and carry an interest rate of 10% per year.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2010-09 ("ASU 2010-09"), which is included in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the "ASC") Topic 855. ASU 2010-09 clarifies that an SEC filer is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. ASU 2010-09 is effective upon the issuance of the final update and did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements.
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC 10 as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC. ASC 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements, but did eliminate all references to pre-codification standards.
The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related notes requires us to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements.
Financial Reporting Release No. 60 requires all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. There are no critical policies or decisions that rely on judgments that are based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made. Note 1 to the financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus, includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K, obligations under any guarantee contracts or contingent obligations. We also have no other commitments, other than the costs of being a public company that will increase our operating costs or cash requirements in the future.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information that would be required to be disclosed in Exchange Act reports is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including to our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, our management, our CEO, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2013. Based on that evaluation, our CEO concluded that as of March 31, 2013, and as of the date that the evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures was completed, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to satisfy the objectives for which they are intended.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based upon the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, as of March 31, 2013.
The matters involving internal control over financial reporting that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; and (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives of having segregation of the initiation of transactions, the recording of transactions and the custody of assets. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of March 31, 2012.
To address the material weaknesses set forth in item (2) discussed above, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only managements report in this annual report.
Management's Remediation Initiatives
In an effort to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated, or plan to initiate, the following series of measures:
We will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function when funds are available to us. First, we will undertake to segregate duties consistent with control objectives of having separate individuals perform (i) the initiation of transactions, (ii) the recording of transactions and (iii) the custody of assets. Second, we will create additional positions to focus on financial reporting and standardizing and documenting our accounting procedures with the goal of increasing the effectiveness of the internal controls in preventing and detecting misstatements of accounting information. Third, we plan to appoint one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to an audit committee resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures such as reviewing and approving estimates and assumptions made by management when funds are available to us.
Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board.
We anticipate that these initiatives will be at best partially, and not fully, implemented by March 31, 2014. Additionally, we plan to again test our updated controls develop a plan to remediate our deficiencies by March 31, 2014.
Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2013, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
Don Calabria was the Companys sole officer and director at the inception of the Company until August 31, 2012. Oscar Hines was the sole officer and director from August 31, 2012 until April 25, 2013.
On April 25, 2013, our Board of Directors appointed Jonathan Jay Howard to serve as CEO, President and sole director of the Board of Directors.
Due to his stock ownership and status as our CEO and only officer and director, Mr. Howard cannot be considered an independent director.
There are no family relationships among our officers and directors.
Our directors, executive officers and control persons have not been involved in any of the following events during the past five years:
any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or
being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.
The term of office of the current directors shall continue until new directors are elected or appointed at an annual meeting of shareholders.
We do not have a separately-designated audit or compensation committee of the Board or any other Board-designated committee. Audit and compensation committee functions are performed by our Board of Directors. We will form such committees in the future as the need for such committees may arise. In addition, at this time we have determined that we do not have an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC on our Board.
We do not have a code of ethics that covers our directors, officers, and employees. We believe that the promulgation of a code of ethics is unnecessary due to the Companys small size and current corporate governance.
None of the above officers has or had a written employment agreement. Don Calabria was the Companys sole officer and director at the inception of the Company until August 31, 2012. Oscar Hines was the sole officer and director from August 31, 2012 until April 25, 2013.On April 25, 2013, Jonathan Jay Howard was appointed as CEO, President and sole director.
We know of no contractual arrangements which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control in the Company.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Massive Dynamics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended March 31, 2013 and since inception on March 15, 2011 through March 31, 2013. Massive Dynamics, Inc.s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Massive Dynamics, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended March 31, 2013 and since inception on March 15, 2011 through March 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has no revenues, has negative working capital at March 31, 2013, has incurred recurring losses and recurring negative cash flow from operating activities, and has an accumulated deficit which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Managements plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.