Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - PETSMART INCFinancial_Report.xls
EX-15.1 - DELOITTE & TOUCHE CONSENT - PETSMART INCpetm-20130505xex151.htm
EX-32.2 - CFO CERTIFICATION - PETSMART INCpetm-20130505xex322.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - PETSMART INCpetm-20130505xex311.htm
EX-32.1 - CEO CERTIFICATION - PETSMART INCpetm-20130505xex321.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - PETSMART INCpetm-20130505xex312.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
_________________________________________ 
FORM 10-Q
_________________________________________ 
(Mark One)
x
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended May 5, 2013
OR
¨
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from              to             
Commission file number: 0-21888
_________________________________________ 
PetSmart, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
_________________________________________ 
Delaware
94-3024325
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
19601 N. 27th Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona
85027
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(623) 580-6100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 _________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
 
x
 
Accelerated filer
 
¨
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer
 
¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company
 
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Common Stock, $.0001 Par Value, 103,316,066 Shares at May 17, 2013




PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
INDEX


 
Page
Number
 
 
 

2


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
PetSmart, Inc.
Phoenix, Arizona

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets of PetSmart, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of May 5, 2013 and April 29, 2012, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and of cash flows for the thirteen week periods then ended.  These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of PetSmart, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 3, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 28, 2013, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of February 3, 2013, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
May 30, 2013


3

PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except par value)
(Unaudited)



 
May 5,
2013
 
February 3,
2013
 
April 29,
2012
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
252,988

 
$
335,155

 
$
268,928

Short-term investments
7,455

 
9,150

 
22,276

Restricted cash
71,226

 
71,916

 
71,929

Receivables, net
66,272

 
72,198

 
57,346

Merchandise inventories
738,568

 
679,090

 
682,896

Deferred income taxes
62,859

 
62,859

 
51,381

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
81,041

 
86,768

 
81,716

Total current assets
1,280,409

 
1,317,136

 
1,236,472

Property and equipment, net
972,679

 
985,707

 
1,035,759

Equity investment in Banfield
28,426

 
39,934

 
26,597

Deferred income taxes
100,601

 
102,992

 
79,798

Goodwill
43,914

 
44,242

 
44,738

Other noncurrent assets
48,155

 
46,970

 
43,036

Total assets
$
2,474,184

 
$
2,536,981

 
$
2,466,400

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable and bank overdraft
$
257,628

 
$
202,122

 
$
246,612

Accrued payroll, bonus and employee benefits
132,705

 
176,082

 
126,195

Accrued occupancy expenses and deferred rents
69,626

 
70,671

 
69,456

Current maturities of capital lease obligations
63,180

 
61,581

 
55,920

Other current liabilities
246,431

 
244,436

 
177,511

Total current liabilities
769,570

 
754,892

 
675,694

Capital lease obligations
462,436

 
464,578

 
496,004

Deferred rents
71,565

 
73,855

 
79,582

Other noncurrent liabilities
119,352

 
120,064

 
115,644

Total liabilities
1,422,923

 
1,413,389

 
1,366,924

Commitments and contingencies


 


 


Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock; $.0001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding

 

 

Common stock; $.0001 par value; 625,000 shares authorized, 167,909, 167,209 and 166,124 shares issued
17

 
17

 
17

Additional paid-in capital
1,441,863

 
1,418,411

 
1,352,889

Retained earnings
1,913,209

 
1,827,996

 
1,586,499

Accumulated other comprehensive income
4,510

 
5,506

 
6,706

Less: Treasury stock, at cost, 64,615, 61,879 and 57,734 shares
(2,308,338
)
 
(2,128,338
)
 
(1,846,635
)
Total stockholders’ equity
1,051,261

 
1,123,592

 
1,099,476

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
2,474,184

 
$
2,536,981

 
$
2,466,400

 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)


 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
 
May 5, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Merchandise sales
$
1,509,372

 
$
1,439,559

Services sales
191,577

 
181,014

Other revenue
9,647

 
9,320

Net sales
1,710,596

 
1,629,893

Cost of merchandise sales
1,037,114

 
994,508

Cost of services sales
134,089

 
128,691

Cost of other revenue
9,647

 
9,320

Total cost of sales
1,180,850

 
1,132,519

Gross profit
529,746

 
497,374

Operating, general and administrative expenses
362,228

 
343,023

Operating income
167,518

 
154,351

Interest expense, net
(13,168
)
 
(14,129
)
Income before income tax expense and equity income from Banfield
154,350

 
140,222

Income tax expense
(55,547
)
 
(48,172
)
Equity income from Banfield
3,612

 
2,633

Net income
102,415

 
94,683

Other comprehensive income, net of income tax:
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(987
)
 
1,219

Other
(9
)
 
(3
)
Comprehensive income
$
101,419

 
$
95,899

Earnings per common share:
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.99

 
$
0.87

Diluted
$
0.98

 
$
0.85

Weighted average shares outstanding:
 
 
 
Basic
103,305

 
108,930

Diluted
104,583

 
111,030

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)



 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
 
May 5, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Net income
$
102,415

 
$
94,683

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
58,916

 
59,709

Loss on disposal of property and equipment
755

 
3,245

Stock-based compensation expense
9,096

 
7,315

Deferred income taxes
3,022

 
12,907

Equity income from Banfield
(3,612
)
 
(2,633
)
Dividend received from Banfield
15,120

 
13,860

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
(8,874
)
 
(28,998
)
Non-cash interest expense
162

 
293

Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Merchandise inventories
(59,829
)
 
(37,439
)
Other assets
8,950

 
(12,239
)
Accounts payable
51,897

 
40,359

Accrued payroll, bonus and employee benefits
(43,340
)
 
(31,921
)
Other liabilities
12,568

 
9,981

Net cash provided by operating activities
147,246

 
129,122

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Purchases of investments

 
(4,027
)
Proceeds from maturities of investments
2,695

 
3,535

Proceeds from sales of investments
125

 
85

Decrease (Increase) in restricted cash
690

 
(1,740
)
Cash paid for property and equipment
(34,818
)
 
(35,931
)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
2,792

 
67

Net cash used in investing activities
(28,516
)
 
(38,011
)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Net proceeds from common stock issued under stock incentive plans
11,253

 
24,648

Minimum statutory withholding requirements
(5,685
)
 
(21,076
)
Cash paid for treasury stock
(201,328
)
 
(174,908
)
Payments of capital lease obligations
(16,655
)
 
(15,017
)
Increase in bank overdraft
3,599

 
6,970

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
8,874

 
28,998

Cash dividends paid to stockholders

 
(15,416
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(199,942
)
 
(165,801
)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(955
)
 
726

DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(82,167
)
 
(73,964
)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
335,155

 
342,892

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
$
252,988

 
$
268,928

 
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
 
 
 
Interest paid
$
13,305

 
$
14,058

Income taxes paid, net of refunds
$
31,260

 
$
24,693

Assets acquired using capital lease obligations
$
16,346

 
$
6,801

Accruals and accounts payable for capital expenditures
$
25,788

 
$
28,079

Dividends declared but unpaid
$
17,544

 
$
15,237

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)



Note 1 — General
PetSmart, Inc., including its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company,” “PetSmart,” “we”, or “us”), is the leading specialty provider of products, services and solutions for the lifetime needs of pets in North America. We offer a broad selection of products for all the life stages of pets, as well as various pet services including professional grooming, training, day camp for dogs, and boarding. We also offer pet products through our website, PetSmart.com. As of May 5, 2013, we operated 1,289 retail stores and had full-service veterinary hospitals in 821 of our stores. MMI Holdings, Inc., through a wholly owned subsidiary, Medical Management International, Inc., collectively referred to as “Banfield,” operated 814 of the veterinary hospitals under the registered trade name of “Banfield, The Pet Hospital.” The remaining 7 hospitals are operated by other third parties in Canada.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or “GAAP,” for interim reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by GAAP for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal, recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the interim periods presented. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2013.

Due to the seasonal nature of our business, the results of operations for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year. Our fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks and ends on the Sunday nearest January 31. Fiscal 2013, a 52-week year, ends on February 2, 2014, while fiscal 2012, a 53-week year, ended on February 3, 2013. Unless otherwise specified, all references to years in these condensed consolidated financial statements are to fiscal years.

Note 2 — Correction to the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
The Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012, has been adjusted from amounts previously reported to reflect a correction to the excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation included in cash flows from operating activities and cash flows from financing activities. This was due to the exclusion of the amount of excess tax benefits relating to restricted stock awards and performance share units that should have been included. The correction resulted in a decrease to net cash provided by operating activities and a corresponding decrease to net cash used in financing activities. The correction is not material to our previously issued condensed consolidated financial statements.
The following table reflects the effects on the financial statement line items of the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (in thousands):
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended April 29, 2012
 
As Reported
 
Correction
 
Adjusted
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation included in operating activities
$
(8,567
)
 
$
(20,431
)
 
$
(28,998
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
149,553

 
(20,431
)
 
129,122

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation included in financing activities
8,567

 
20,431

 
28,998

Net cash used in financing activities
(186,232
)
 
20,431

 
(165,801
)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(73,964
)
 

 
(73,964
)

Note 3 — Foreign Currency
Foreign currency translation adjustments are included in other comprehensive income and are reported in stockholders' equity in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Transaction gains and losses are included in net income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.

Activities related to foreign currency adjustments were as follows (in thousands):
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
 
May 5, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Deferred tax (benefit) expense on translation adjustments
$
(631
)
 
$
780

Transaction loss (gain)
203

 
(57
)

7

PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries



The change in the carrying value of goodwill was due to the impact of foreign currency translation adjustments during the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and April 29, 2012.

Note 4 — Investments
Short-term Investments
At May 5, 2013February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, our short-term investments consisted of municipal bonds with various maturities, representing funds available for current operations. These short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1). Accrued interest was immaterial at May 5, 2013February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012. The amortized cost basis at May 5, 2013February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, was $7.3 million, $9.1 million, and $22.0 million, respectively. Unrealized gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income.

Investments in Negotiable Certificates of Deposit
At May 5, 2013, February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, we had investments in negotiable certificates of deposit, or “NCDs,” with various maturities. These investments are classified as held-to-maturity and are carried at their amortized cost basis.

The amortized cost basis of our investments in NCDs was classified in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows (in thousands):
 
May 5, 2013
 
February 3, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
$
1,646

 
$
2,571

 
$
11,889

Noncurrent assets

 
240

 
1,660


The aggregate fair value of our investments in NCDs was $1.6 million, $2.8 million, and $13.6 million at May 5, 2013February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively. The fair value is determined using pricing models which use inputs based on observable market data (Level 2). The inputs of the pricing models are issuer spreads and reported trades. We had no unrecognized gains or losses for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013. Unrecognized gains for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012, were immaterial.

Equity Investment in Banfield
We have an investment in Banfield which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. As of May 5, 2013February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, our investment represented 21.4% of the voting common stock and 21.0% of the combined voting and non-voting stock. Our investment includes goodwill of $15.9 million. The goodwill is calculated as the excess of the purchase price for each step of the acquisition of our ownership interest in Banfield relative to that step’s portion of Banfield’s net assets at the respective acquisition date.

Banfield’s financial data is summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
May 5, 2013
 
February 3, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Current assets
$
467,478

 
$
429,787

 
$
401,541

Noncurrent assets
153,478

 
141,209

 
142,239

Current liabilities
527,151

 
388,729

 
295,006

Noncurrent liabilities
27,001

 
16,508

 
74,764

 
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
 
May 5, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Net sales
$
222,129

 
$
194,278

Income from operations
29,616

 
21,321

Net income
17,199

 
12,543



8

PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)

We recognized license fees and reimbursements for specific operating expenses from Banfield of $9.6 million and $9.3 million during the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively, in other revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. The related costs are included in cost of other revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. Receivables from Banfield totaled $3.2 million, $3.2 million, and $3.1 million at May 5, 2013February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively, and were included in receivables, net in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Our master operating agreement with Banfield also includes a provision for the sharing of profits on the sale of therapeutic pet foods sold in all stores with an operating Banfield hospital. The net sales and gross profit on the sale of therapeutic pet food are not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 5 — Reserve for Closed Stores
The components of the reserve for closed stores were as follows (in thousands):
 
May 5, 2013
 
February 3, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Total remaining gross occupancy costs
$
21,443

 
$
22,699

 
$
26,933

Less:
 
 
 
 
 
Expected sublease income
(12,588
)
 
(13,117
)
 
(15,876
)
Interest costs
(734
)
 
(856
)
 
(1,165
)
Reserve for closed stores
$
8,121

 
$
8,726

 
$
9,892


 
 
 
 
 
Current portion, included in other current liabilities
3,615

 
3,466

 
3,256

Noncurrent portion, included in other noncurrent liabilities
4,506

 
5,260

 
6,636

Reserve for closed stores
$
8,121

 
$
8,726

 
$
9,892


The activity related to the reserve for closed stores was as follows (in thousands):
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
 
May 5, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Opening balance
$
8,726

 
$
10,007

Provision for new store closures
669

 
1,523

Changes in sublease assumptions
(21
)
 
(315
)
Other charges
68

 
80

Payments
(1,321
)
 
(1,403
)
Ending balance
$
8,121

 
$
9,892


Note 6 — Earnings per Common Share
The following table presents a reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding used in the earnings per common share calculations (in thousands):
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
 
May 5, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Basic
103,305

 
108,930

Dilutive stock-based compensation awards
1,278

 
2,100

Diluted
104,583

 
111,030


Certain stock-based compensation awards representing 0.8 million and 0.3 million shares of common stock in the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively, were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share because the inclusion of such awards would have been antidilutive for the periods presented.


9

PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 7 — Stockholders’ Equity
Share Purchase Program
The following table presents purchases of our common stock under the respective share purchase programs (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
Share Purchase Program
 
May 5, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Authorized Amount
 
Date Approved by Board
 
Program Termination Date
 
Shares Purchased
 
Purchase Value
 
Shares Purchased
 
Purchase Value
$450,000
 
June 2011
 
January 31, 2013
 

 
$

 
3,049

 
$
174,908

$525,000
 
June 2012
 
January 31, 2014
 
2,736

 
180,000

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
2,736

 
$
180,000

 
3,049

 
$
174,908


As of May 5, 2013, $166.9 million remained available under the $525.0 million program.

Dividends
During the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, the Board of Directors declared the following dividend:
Date Declared
 
Dividend Amount
per Share
 
Stockholders of
Record Date
 
Payment Date
March 26, 2013
 
$
0.165

 
May 3, 2013
 
May 17, 2013

Note 8 — Stock-based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, and the total income tax benefit recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income were as follows (in thousands):
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
 
May 5, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Stock options expense
$
3,697

 
$
2,816

Restricted stock expense
1,354

 
1,195

Performance share unit expense
4,045

 
3,304

Stock-based compensation expense – equity awards
9,096

 
7,315

Management equity unit expense
1,635

 
3,993

Total stock-based compensation expense
$
10,731

 
$
11,308

Tax benefit
$
4,149

 
$
4,244


At May 5, 2013, the total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for equity awards, net of estimated forfeitures, was $61.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.4 years. At May 5, 2013, the total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for liability awards, net of estimated forfeitures, was $3.2 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.9 years.

The 2010 management equity unit grant vested on March 29, 2013, and $10.8 million was paid in cash in April 2013. The 2009 management equity unit grant vested on March 9, 2012, and $11.9 million was paid in cash in March 2012.

Note 9 — Income Taxes
At the end of each interim period, we estimate the annual effective tax rate and apply that rate to our quarterly earnings. The tax expense or benefit related to significant, unusual, or extraordinary items is recognized in the interim period in which those items occur. In addition, the effect of changes in enacted tax laws, rates, or tax status is recognized in the interim period in which the change occurs. The accounting estimates used to compute the provision for income taxes may change as new events occur, additional information is obtained, or the tax environment changes.


10

PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)

Note 10 — Credit Facilities
We have a $100.0 million revolving credit facility agreement, or “Revolving Credit Facility,” which expires on March 23, 2017. Borrowings under this Revolving Credit Facility are subject to a borrowing base and bear interest, at our option, at LIBOR plus 1.25%, or Base Rate plus 0.25%. The Base Rate is defined as the highest of the following rates: the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, the Adjusted LIBOR plus 1.0%, or the Prime Rate.

We are subject to fees payable each month at an annual rate of 0.20% of the unused amount of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility also gives us the ability to issue letters of credit, which reduce the amount available under the Revolving Credit Facility. Letter of credit issuances under the Revolving Credit Facility are subject to interest payable and bear interest of 0.625% for standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit.

As of May 5, 2013, February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, we had no borrowings and $17.9 million, $17.9 million, and $24.4 million in stand-by letter of credit issuances under our Revolving Credit Facility, respectively.

We also have a $100.0 million stand-alone letter of credit facility agreement, or “Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility,” which expires on March 23, 2017. We are subject to fees payable each month at an annual rate of 0.175% of the average daily face amount of the letters of credit outstanding during the preceding month. In addition, we are required to maintain a cash deposit with the lender equal to 103% of the amount of outstanding letters of credit.

We had $69.2 million, $69.8 million, and $69.8 million in outstanding letters of credit, issued for guarantees provided for insurance programs, under our Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility as of May 5, 2013, February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively. We had $71.2 million, $71.9 million, and $71.9 million in restricted cash on deposit with the Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility lender as of May 5, 2013, February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively.

Our Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility permit the payment of dividends if we are not in default and payment conditions as defined in the agreement are satisfied. As of May 5, 2013, we were in compliance with the terms and covenants of our Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility are secured by substantially all our financial assets.

Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies
Advertising Purchase Commitments
As of May 5, 2013, we had obligations to purchase $27.9 million of advertising through the remainder of 2013.

Product Purchase Commitments
As of May 5, 2013, we had various commitments to purchase $47.1 million of merchandise from certain vendors through the remainder of 2013 and $25.0 million in 2014.

Litigation and Settlements
We are involved in the legal proceedings described below and are subject to other claims and litigation arising in the normal course of our business. We have made accruals with respect to certain of these matters, where appropriate, that are reflected in our condensed consolidated financial statements but are not, individually or in the aggregate, considered material. For other matters, we have not made accruals because we have not yet determined that a loss is probable or because the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated. While the ultimate outcome of the matters described below cannot be determined, we currently do not expect that these proceedings and claims, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain, however, and if decided adversely to us, or if we determine that settlement of particular litigation is appropriate, we may be subject to liability that could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Accordingly, we disclose matters below for which a material loss is reasonably possible. In each case, however, we have either determined that the range of loss is not reasonably estimable or that any reasonably estimable range of loss is not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2012, we were named as a defendant in Moore, et al. v. PetSmart, Inc., et. al., a lawsuit originally filed in California Superior Court for the County of Alameda. PetSmart removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint brings both individual and class action claims, first alleging that PetSmart failed to engage in the

11

PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)
(Unaudited)

interactive process and failed to accommodate the disabilities of four current and former named associates. The complaint also alleges on behalf of current and former hourly store associates that PetSmart failed to provide pay for all hours worked, failed to properly reimburse associates for business expenses, and failed to provide timely and uninterrupted meal and rest periods. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, statutory penalties, and other relief, including attorneys' fees, costs, and injunctive relief.

In September 2012, a former associate named us as a defendant in McKee, et al. v. PetSmart, Inc., which is currently pending before the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The case seeks to assert a Fair Labor Standards Act collective action on behalf of PetSmart's operations managers and similarly situated employees. The complaint alleges that PetSmart has misclassified operations managers as exempt and as a result failed to pay them overtime for hours worked in excess of forty hours per week. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, liquidated damages, and other relief, including attorneys' fees, costs, and injunctive relief.

Also in September 2012, a former groomer filed a lawsuit against us captioned Negrete, et al. v. PetSmart, Inc. that is currently pending in the California Superior Court for the County of Shasta. The plaintiff seeks to assert claims on behalf of current and former California pet stylists that PetSmart failed to provide pay for all hours worked, failed to properly reimburse associates for business expenses, failed to provide proper wage statements, and failed to provide timely and uninterrupted meal and rest periods. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, statutory penalties, and other relief, including attorneys' fees, costs, and injunctive relief.

On December 14, 2012, a group of four former managers filed a lawsuit against us captioned Miller, et al. v. PetSmart, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The plaintiffs seek to assert claims on behalf of hourly and exempt store management personnel from December 14, 2008, to the present for alleged unreimbursed mileage expenses. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, statutory penalties, and other relief, including attorneys’ fees, costs, and injunctive relief.

On December 22, 2012, a customer filed a lawsuit against us captioned Matin, et al. v. Nestle Purina PetCare Company, et al. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiff claims he purchased jerky treats containing duck or chicken imported from China that caused injury to his pet, and he seeks to assert claims on behalf of a nationwide class of consumers. We tendered the claim to Nestle Purina, and Nestle Purina is currently defending the case on our behalf. The case was subsequently transferred to the Northern District of Illinois and consolidated with another case involving the same products, Adkins, et al. v. Nestle Purina PetCare Company, et al.

On February 20, 2013, a former employee filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California for the County of Orange captioned Pace v. PetSmart, Inc. PetSmart removed the case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint seeks to certify a class of all former PetSmart employees in California since February 20, 2010, who were not paid all wages owed upon their separations. The complaint also challenges PetSmart's use of pay cards for separation payments and seeks waiting time penalties, attorneys' fees, and other relief. The plaintiff is currently seeking to amend her complaint to assert additional claims under California's Private Attorney General Act as well as individual claims for wrongful termination and disability discrimination.
We are involved in the defense of various other legal proceedings that we do not believe are material to our condensed consolidated financial statements.


12

PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries


Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Except for historical information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. In the normal course of business, our financial position is routinely subjected to a variety of risks, including market risks associated with store expansion, investments in information systems, international expansion, vendor reliability, competitive forces, and government regulatory actions. Our actual results could differ materially from projected results due to some or all of the factors discussed below. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below:

A decline in consumer spending or a change in consumer preferences could reduce our sales or profitability and harm our business.
The pet products and services retail industry is very competitive and continued competitive forces may adversely impact our business and financial results.
Comparable store sales growth may decrease. If we are unable to increase sales at our existing stores, our results of operations could be harmed.
We may be unable to continue to open new stores and enter new markets successfully. If we are unable to successfully reformat existing stores and open new stores, our results of operations could be harmed. Also, store development may place increasing demands on management and operating systems and may erode sales at existing stores.
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate due to seasonal changes associated with the pet products and services retail industry and the timing of expenses, new store openings, and store closures.
Failure to successfully manage and execute our marketing initiatives could have a negative impact on our business.
A disruption, malfunction, or increased costs in the operation, expansion, or replenishment of our distribution centers, or our supply chain, would impact our ability to deliver to our stores or increase our expenses, which could harm our sales and results of operations.
Failure to successfully manage our inventory could harm our business.
If our information systems fail to perform as designed, or are interrupted for a significant period of time, our business could be harmed.
If we fail to protect the integrity and security of customer and associate information, our business could be adversely impacted.
The disruption of the relationship with or the loss of any of our key vendors, including our vendors with whom we have exclusive relationships, a decision by our vendors to make their products available in supermarkets or through warehouse clubs and other mass and retail merchandisers, the inability of our vendors to provide quality products in a timely or cost-effective manner, the availability of generic products, or risks associated with the suppliers from whom products are sourced, all could harm our business.
Our expanded offering of proprietary branded products may not improve our financial performance and may expose us to product liability claims.
Food safety, quality, and health concerns could affect our business.
We depend on key executives, store managers, and other personnel and may not be able to retain or replace these employees or recruit additional qualified personnel, which could harm our business.
Our international operations may result in additional market risks, which may harm our business.
Our business may be harmed if the operation of veterinary hospitals at our stores is limited or fails to continue.
We face various risks as an e-commerce retailer.
Our business could be harmed if we were unable to effectively manage our cash flow and raise any needed additional capital on acceptable terms.
Volatility and disruption to the global capital and credit markets could adversely affect our ability to access credit and the financial soundness of our suppliers.
Failure to successfully integrate any business we acquire could have an adverse impact on our financial results.
Failure to protect our intellectual property could have a negative impact on our operating results.    

13


A determination that we are in violation of any contractual obligations or government regulations could result in a disruption to our operations and could impact our financial results.
Failure of our internal controls over financial reporting could harm our business and financial results.
Changes in laws, accounting standards and subjective assumptions, estimates, and judgments by management related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results.
An unfavorable determination by tax regulators may cause our provision for income and other taxes to be inadequate and may result in a material impact to our financial results.
Failure to obtain commercial insurance at acceptable prices, or failure to adequately reserve for self-insured exposures, might have a negative impact on our business.
Pending legislation, weather, catastrophic events, disease, or other factors, could disrupt our operations, supply chain, and the supply of small pets and products we sell, which could harm our reputation and decrease sales.
Fluctuations in the stock market, as well as general economic and market conditions, may impact our operations, sales, financial results, and market price of our common stock.
We have implemented some anti-takeover provisions that may prevent or delay an acquisition of us that may not be beneficial to our shareholders.
For more information about these risks, see the discussion under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference.

14


Overview
Based on our 2012 net sales of $6.8 billion, we are North America's leading specialty provider of products, services, and solutions for the lifetime needs of pets. As of May 5, 2013, we operated 1,289 stores, and we plan to continue our store growth during the remainder of 2013. Our stores carry a broad assortment of high-quality pet supplies at everyday low prices. We offer approximately 11,000 distinct items in our stores and 11,000 additional items on our website, PetSmart.com, including nationally recognized brand names, as well as an extensive selection of proprietary brands across a range of product categories.

We complement our extensive product assortment with a wide selection of pet services, including grooming, training, day camp for dogs, and boarding. All our stores feature pet styling salons that provide high-quality grooming services and offer comprehensive pet training services. Our PetsHotels provide boarding for dogs and cats, which includes 24-hour supervision by caregivers who are PetSmart trained to provide personalized pet care, temperature controlled rooms and suites, daily specialty treats and play time, as well as day camp for dogs. As of May 5, 2013, we operated 196 PetsHotels.

We make full-service veterinary care available through our strategic relationship with certain third-party operators. As of May 5, 2013, full-service veterinary hospitals were in 821 of our stores. MMI Holdings, Inc., through a wholly owned subsidiary, Medical Management International, Inc., collectively referred to as “Banfield,” operated 814 of the veterinary hospitals under the registered trade name of “Banfield, The Pet Hospital.” The remaining 7 hospitals are operated by other third parties in Canada.

The principal challenges we face as a business are the highly competitive market in which we operate and the volatility in the macro-economy. However, we believe we have a competitive advantage in our solutions for the Total Lifetime CareSM of pets, including pet services and proprietary brands, which we think cannot be easily duplicated. Additionally, we consider our cash flow from operations and cash on hand to be adequate to meet our operating, investing, and financing needs in the foreseeable future, and we continue to have access to our revolving credit facility. We continuously assess the economic environment and market conditions to guide our decisions regarding our uses of cash, including capital expenditures, investments, dividends, and the purchase of treasury stock.

Executive Summary
Diluted earnings per common share increased 15.3% to $0.98 on net income of $102.4 million, for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, compared to diluted earnings per common share of $0.85 on net income of $94.7 million for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012.

Net sales increased 5.0% to $1.7 billion for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, compared to $1.6 billion for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012. The increase in net sales for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, included an unfavorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations of $1.9 million.

Comparable store sales, or sales in stores open at least one year as well as internet sales, increased 3.5% for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013.
 
Services sales increased 5.8% to $191.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, compared to $181.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012.

As of May 5, 2013, we had $253.0 million in cash and cash equivalents and $71.2 million in restricted cash. We had no short-term debt, and did not borrow against our revolving credit facility during the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013.

We purchased 2.7 million shares of our common stock for $180.0 million during the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013.

15

PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Continued)


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We discuss our critical accounting policies and estimates in Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2013. We have made no significant change in our critical accounting policies since February 3, 2013.

Results of Operations
The following table presents the percent to net sales of certain items included in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income:
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
 
May 5, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Net sales
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
Total cost of sales
69.0

 
69.5

Gross profit
31.0

 
30.5

Operating, general and administrative expenses
21.2

 
21.0

Operating income
9.8

 
9.5

Interest expense, net
(0.8
)
 
(0.9
)
Income before income tax expense and equity income from Banfield
9.0

 
8.6

Income tax expense
(3.2
)
 
(3.0
)
Equity income from Banfield
0.2

 
0.2

Net income
6.0
%
 
5.8
%

Thirteen Weeks Ended May 5, 2013, Compared to the Thirteen Weeks Ended April 29, 2012
Net Sales
Net sales increased 5.0% to $1.7 billion for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, compared to $1.6 billion for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012. The increase in net sales for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, included an unfavorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations of $1.9 million. Approximately 70% of the sales increase is due to a 3.5% increase in comparable store sales, which includes internet sales, for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and 30% of the sales increase is due to the addition of 48 net new stores and 2 net new PetsHotels since April 29, 2012. Internet sales were not material to net sales or comparable store sales for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, or April 29, 2012.

Comparable store sales growth was driven by an increase in comparable transactions and average sales per comparable transaction. Comparable transactions were 0.8% for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and 3.3% for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012.

During the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, we implemented initiatives to increase traffic and continue to improve average sales per transaction. We expanded the space dedicated to certain brands of super-premium foods, including our proprietary brand Simply Nourish. We also introduced new formulations in both dog and cat foods across our top channel-exclusive brands, which further expanded the grain-free and high protein offerings. We expanded hardgoods with new brands of pet apparel and toys available exclusively at PetSmart, and refreshed the assortments of existing brands. Additionally, we continued to enhance our website with richer content and better navigation, including new tools like our online Food Selector, which helps pet parents narrow our wide assortment down to choices that offer the best nutrition for their pets' unique health needs and preferences.

Services sales, which include grooming, training, day camp for dogs, and boarding, increased 5.8% to $191.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, compared to $181.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012. Services sales represented 11.2% and 11.1% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively. During the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, we rolled out several new services offerings in the grooming salon such as new puppy bath packages and application of flea and tick solution. We also continued to develop our pipeline of innovative services and exclusive offerings that are integrated with our merchandise brands and supported by marketing. The increase in services sales is primarily due to continued strong demand for our grooming services, improved occupancy in our PetsHotels, and the addition of new stores and PetsHotels since April 29, 2012.

16



Other revenue included in net sales during the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, represents license fees and reimbursements for utilities and specific operating expenses charged to Banfield under the master operating agreement which comprised 0.6% of net sales, or $9.6 million, compared to 0.6% of net sales, or $9.3 million, for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012.

Gross Profit
Gross profit increased 45 basis points to 31.0% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, from 30.5% for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012. Store occupancy and supply chain costs included in margin provided 30 and 15 basis points of leverage, respectively. Services margin increased 15 basis points, which was offset by a decrease in merchandise margin of 15 basis points.

Operating, General and Administrative Expenses
Operating, general and administrative expenses increased to 21.2% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, compared to 21.0% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012. The increase is primarily due to planned incremental advertising spend focused on our differentiated service offerings and professional fees associated with various information technology projects.

Interest Expense, net
Interest expense, which is primarily related to capital lease obligations, was $13.4 million during the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, compared to $14.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012. The decrease in interest expense was due to a decrease in capital lease obligations. Included in interest expense, net was interest income of $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively.

Income Tax Expense
For the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, the $55.5 million income tax expense represents an effective tax rate of 36.0% compared with the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012, when we had income tax expense of $48.2 million, which represented an effective tax rate of 34.4%. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily due to an increase in certain state tax liabilities. The effective tax rate is calculated by dividing our income tax expense, which includes the income tax expense related to our equity income from Banfield, by income before income tax expense and equity income from Banfield.

Equity Income from Banfield
Our equity income from our investment in Banfield was $3.6 million and $2.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively, based on our 21.0% ownership in Banfield.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
We believe that our operating cash flow and cash on hand will be adequate to meet our operating, investing, and financing needs in the foreseeable future. In addition, we have access to our $100.0 million revolving credit facility, which expires on March 23, 2017. However, there can be no assurance of our ability to access credit markets on commercially acceptable terms in the future. We expect to continuously assess the economic environment and market conditions to guide our decisions regarding our uses of cash, including capital expenditures, investments, dividends, and the purchase of treasury stock.

We finance our operations, new store and PetsHotel growth, store remodels, and other expenditures to support our growth initiatives primarily through cash generated by operating activities. Receipts from our sales come from cash, checks, and third-party debit and credit cards, and therefore provide a significant source of liquidity. Cash is used in operating activities primarily to fund procurement of merchandise inventories and other assets, net of accounts payable and other accrued liabilities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $147.2 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, compared to $129.1 million for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012. The primary differences between the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and April 29, 2012, include increased net income of $7.7 million and a decrease in excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $20.1 million, offset by a $9.9 million decrease in deferred income taxes.

Net cash used in investing activities consisted primarily of expenditures associated with opening new stores, reformatting existing stores, expenditures associated with equipment and computer software in support of our system initiatives, PetsHotel construction costs, and other expenditures to support our growth plans and initiatives. Net cash used in investing activities was

17


$28.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, compared to $38.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012. The primary differences between the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and April 29, 2012, were a decrease in purchases of investments of $4.0 million, an increase in proceeds from sale of property and equipment of $2.7 million, and a decrease in restricted cash of $2.4 million.

Net cash used in financing activities was $199.9 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and consisted primarily of the cash paid for treasury stock, payments on capital lease obligations, offset by net proceeds from common stock issued under equity incentive plans and an increase in our bank overdraft. Net cash used in financing activities for the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012, was $165.8 million. The primary differences between the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2012, were an increase of $26.4 million in cash paid for treasury stock, a decrease of $20.1 million in excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation, and a decrease of $15.4 million in cash dividends paid to stockholders. Dividends declared in December are typically paid to stockholders in February of the following year, which was the case for the dividend declared on December 7, 2011. The Board of Directors approved the payment date for the dividend declared on December 7, 2012, to be accelerated to December 31, 2012.

Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements
Substantially all our stores are leased facilities. We opened 13 new stores and closed 2 stores in the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013. Generally, each new store requires capital expenditures of approximately $0.7 million for fixtures, equipment, and leasehold improvements, approximately $0.3 million for inventory and approximately $0.1 million for preopening costs. We expect total capital expenditures to be $140.0 million to $150.0 million for 2013, based on our plan to continue our store growth, remodel or replace certain store assets, enhance our supply chain, continue our investment in the development of our information systems, and improve our infrastructure.

Our ability to fund our operations and make planned capital expenditures depends on our future operating performance and cash flow, which are subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.

The following table presents our capital expenditures (in thousands):
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
 
May 5, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Capital Expenditures:
 
 
 
New stores
$
5,725

 
$
7,545

Store-related projects (1)
19,930

 
15,097

Information technology
4,896

 
9,069

Supply chain
4,177

 
4,182

Other
90

 
38

    Total capital expenditures
$
34,818

 
$
35,931

____________

(1)
Includes store and grooming salon remodels, equipment replacement, relocations, and various merchandising projects, as well as building PetsHotels in new and existing locations.

Commitments
As of May 5, 2013, we had obligations to purchase $27.9 million of advertising through the remainder of 2013.

As of May 5, 2013, we had various commitments to purchase $47.1 million of merchandise from certain vendors through the remainder of 2013 and $25.0 million in 2014.

There have been no other material changes in our contractual obligations since February 3, 2013. Information regarding our contractual obligations is provided in Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2013.

Credit Facilities
We have a $100.0 million revolving credit facility agreement, or “Revolving Credit Facility,” which expires on March 23, 2017. Borrowings under this Revolving Credit Facility are subject to a borrowing base and bear interest, at our option, at LIBOR plus 1.25%, or Base Rate plus 0.25%. The Base Rate is defined as the highest of the following rates: the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5%, the Adjusted LIBOR plus 1.0%, or the Prime Rate.

18



We are subject to fees payable each month at an annual rate of 0.20% of the unused amount of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility also gives us the ability to issue letters of credit, which reduce the amount available under the Revolving Credit Facility. Letter of credit issuances under the Revolving Credit Facility are subject to interest payable and bear interest of 0.625% for standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit.

As of May 5, 2013, February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, we had no borrowings and $17.9 million, $17.9 million, and $24.4 million in stand-by letter of credit issuances under our Revolving Credit Facility, respectively.

We also have a $100.0 million stand-alone letter of credit facility agreement, or “Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility,” which expires on March 23, 2017. We are subject to fees payable each month at an annual rate of 0.175% of the average daily face amount of the letters of credit outstanding during the preceding month. In addition, we are required to maintain a cash deposit with the lender equal to 103% of the amount of outstanding letters of credit.

We had $69.2 million, $69.8 million, and $69.8 million in outstanding letters of credit, issued for guarantees provided for insurance programs, under our Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility as of May 5, 2013, February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively. We had $71.2 million, $71.9 million, and $71.9 million in restricted cash on deposit with the Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility lender as of May 5, 2013, February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively.

Our Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility permit the payment of dividends if we are not in default and payment conditions as defined in the agreement are satisfied. As of May 5, 2013, we were in compliance with the terms and covenants of our Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility and Stand-alone Letter of Credit Facility are secured by substantially all our financial assets.

Share Purchase Program
The following table presents purchases of our common stock under the respective share purchase programs (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thirteen Weeks Ended
Share Purchase Program
 
May 5, 2013
 
April 29, 2012
Authorized Amount
 
Date Approved by Board
 
Program Termination Date
 
Shares Purchased
 
Purchase Value
 
Shares Purchased
 
Purchase Value
$450,000
 
June 2011
 
January 31, 2013
 

 
$

 
3,049

 
$
174,908

$525,000
 
June 2012
 
January 31, 2014
 
2,736

 
180,000

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
2,736

 
$
180,000

 
3,049

 
$
174,908


As of May 5, 2013, $166.9 million remained available under the $525.0 million program.

Dividends
During the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, the Board of Directors declared the following dividend:
Date Declared
 
Dividend Amount
per Share
 
Stockholders of
Record Date
 
Payment Date
March 26, 2013
 
$
0.165

 
May 3, 2013
 
May 17, 2013

Related Party Transactions
We have an investment in Banfield which is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. As of May 5, 2013February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, our investment represented 21.4% of the voting common stock and 21.0% of the combined voting and non-voting stock.

Our equity income from our investment in Banfield, which is recorded one month in arrears under the equity method of accounting, was $3.6 million and $2.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively. During

19


the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and April 29, 2012, we received a dividend from Banfield of $15.1 million and $13.9 million, respectively.

We recognized license fees and reimbursements for specific operating expenses from Banfield of $9.6 million and $9.3 million during the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively, in other revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. The related costs are included in cost of other revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. Receivables from Banfield totaled $3.2 million, $3.2 million, and $3.1 million at May 5, 2013February 3, 2013, and April 29, 2012, respectively, and were included in receivables, net in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Our master operating agreement also includes a provision for the sharing of profits on the sale of therapeutic pet foods sold in all stores with an operating Banfield hospital. The net sales and gross profit on the sale of therapeutic pet food are not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Seasonality and Inflation
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. We typically realize a higher portion of our net sales and operating profits during the fourth quarter due to increased holiday traffic. As a result of this seasonality, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful and that these comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of future performance. Because our stores typically draw customers from a large trade area, sales also may be impacted by adverse weather or travel conditions, which are more prevalent during certain seasons of the year. As a result of our expansion plans, the timing of new store and PetsHotel openings and related preopening costs, the amount of revenue contributed by new and existing

20

PetSmart, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Continued)

stores and PetsHotels, and the timing and estimated obligations of store closures, our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate. Controllable expenses could fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter in a year. Finally, because new stores tend to experience higher payroll, advertising, and other store level expenses as a percentage of sales than mature stores, new store openings will also contribute to lower store operating margins until these stores become established.

While we have experienced inflationary pressure in recent years, we have been able to largely mitigate the effect by increasing retail prices accordingly. Although neither inflation nor deflation has had a material impact on net operating results, we can make no assurance that our business will not be affected by inflation or deflation in the future.

Impact of Federal Health Care Reform Legislation
In March 2010, the President of the United States signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or “the Acts.” We expect to be in compliance with the Acts in 2014, and we do not expect the impact on the consolidated financial statements to be material.

21


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As of May 5, 2013, there have been no material changes in the market risk information disclosed by us in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2013. More detailed information concerning market risk can be found in Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2013.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of May 5, 2013. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

No changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of May 5, 2013, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level and designed to meet the objective at the reasonable assurance level.


22

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION




Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in the legal proceedings described below and are subject to other claims and litigation arising in the normal course of our business. We have made accruals with respect to certain of these matters, where appropriate, that are reflected in our condensed consolidated financial statements but are not, individually or in the aggregate, considered material. For other matters, we have not made accruals because we have not yet determined that a loss is probable or because the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated. While the ultimate outcome of the matters described below cannot be determined, we currently do not expect that these proceedings and claims, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain, however, and if decided adversely to us, or if we determine that settlement of particular litigation is appropriate, we may be subject to liability that could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Accordingly, we disclose matters below for which a material loss is reasonably possible. In each case, however, we have either determined that the range of loss is not reasonably estimable or that any reasonably estimable range of loss is not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2012, we were named as a defendant in Moore, et al. v. PetSmart, Inc., et. al., a lawsuit originally filed in California Superior Court for the County of Alameda. PetSmart removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint brings both individual and class action claims, first alleging that PetSmart failed to engage in the interactive process and failed to accommodate the disabilities of four current and former named associates. The complaint also alleges on behalf of current and former hourly store associates that PetSmart failed to provide pay for all hours worked, failed to properly reimburse associates for business expenses, and failed to provide timely and uninterrupted meal and rest periods. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, statutory penalties, and other relief, including attorneys' fees, costs, and injunctive relief.

In September 2012, a former associate named us as a defendant in McKee, et al. v. PetSmart, Inc., which is currently pending before the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The case seeks to assert a Fair Labor Standards Act collective action on behalf of PetSmart's operations managers and similarly situated employees. The complaint alleges that PetSmart has misclassified operations managers as exempt and as a result failed to pay them overtime for hours worked in excess of forty hours per week. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, liquidated damages, and other relief, including attorneys' fees, costs, and injunctive relief.

Also in September 2012, a former groomer filed a lawsuit against us captioned Negrete, et al. v. PetSmart, Inc. that is currently pending in the California Superior Court for the County of Shasta. The plaintiff seeks to assert claims on behalf of current and former California pet stylists that PetSmart failed to provide pay for all hours worked, failed to properly reimburse associates for business expenses, failed to provide proper wage statements, and failed to provide timely and uninterrupted meal and rest periods. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, statutory penalties, and other relief, including attorneys' fees, costs, and injunctive relief.

23



On December 14, 2012, a group of four former managers filed a lawsuit against us captioned Miller, et al. v. PetSmart, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The plaintiffs seek to assert claims on behalf of hourly and exempt store management personnel from December 14, 2008, to the present for alleged unreimbursed mileage expenses. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, statutory penalties, and other relief, including attorneys’ fees, costs, and injunctive relief.

On December 22, 2012, a customer filed a lawsuit against us captioned Matin, et al. v. Nestle Purina PetCare Company, et al. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiff claims he purchased jerky treats containing duck or chicken imported from China that caused injury to his pet, and he seeks to assert claims on behalf of a nationwide class of consumers. We tendered the claim to Nestle Purina, and Nestle Purina is currently defending the case on our behalf. The case was subsequently transferred to the Northern District of Illinois and consolidated with another case involving the same products, Adkins, et al. v. Nestle Purina PetCare Company, et al.

On February 20, 2013, a former employee filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California for the County of Orange captioned Pace v. PetSmart, Inc. PetSmart removed the case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint seeks to certify a class of all former PetSmart employees in California since February 20, 2010, who were not paid all wages owed upon their separations. The complaint also challenges PetSmart's use of pay cards for separation payments and seeks waiting time penalties, attorneys' fees, and other relief. The plaintiff is currently seeking to amend her complaint to assert additional claims under California's Private Attorney General Act as well as individual claims for wrongful termination and disability discrimination.

We are involved in the defense of various other legal proceedings that we do not believe are material to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2013, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table shows purchases of our common stock and the available funds to purchase additional common stock for each period in the thirteen weeks ended May 5, 2013:
Period
 
Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
 
Average Price
Paid per Share
 
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
 
Value That May
Yet be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs(1)
February 4, 2013 to March 3, 2013
 
2,735,797

 
$
65.79

 
2,735,797

 
$
166,941,000

March 4, 2013 to April 7, 2013
 

 
$

 

 
$
166,941,000

April 8, 2013 to May 5, 2013
 

 
$

 

 
$
166,941,000

Thirteen Weeks Ended May 5, 2013
 
2,735,797

 
$
65.79

 
2,735,797

 
$
166,941,000

__________

(1)
In June 2012, the Board of Directors approved a share purchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $525.0 million of our common stock through January 31, 2014.

24


Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits 
Exhibit 10.1+
 
Offer Letter to Carrie W. Teffner, dated May 5, 2013, filed as Exhibit 10.27 to PetSmart, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 13, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
 
 
Exhibit 15.1
  
Awareness Letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding unaudited interim financial statements.
 
 
 
Exhibit 31.1
  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer as required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 
 
Exhibit 31.2
  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer as required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.1*
  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer as required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.2*
  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer as required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 
 
Exhibit 101.INS
  
XBRL Instance
 
 
 
Exhibit 101.SCH
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
 
 
 
Exhibit 101.CAL
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation
 
 
 
Exhibit 101.LAB
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels
 
 
 
Exhibit 101.PRE
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation
 
 
 
Exhibit 101.DEF
  
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition
____________
+
Compensation plans or arrangements in which directors or executive officers are eligible to participate.
*
The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of PetSmart, Inc., under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

25


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
PetSmart, Inc.
 
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Lawrence P. Molloy
Date:
May 30, 2013
Lawrence P. Molloy
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

26