Exhibit 99.1

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial Report (unaudited)

March 31, 2012

Contents

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011

(dollars and shares in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

2

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 (unaudited)

(dollars and shares in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

(Continued)

5

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.   Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of business: CGB Holdings, Inc. (the Company), through its majority-owned subsidiary, Professional Business Bank (the Bank), provides a full range of banking services to its commercial and consumer customers. The Bank is headquartered in Pasadena, California, in the San Gabriel Valley of Los Angeles County, California. The Bank currently operates from four full-service locations, with the main office and branch office in Pasadena and one branch office each in Montebello and Glendale. All branches are located in the San Gabriel Valley of Los Angeles County. The Bank’s primary source of revenue is providing loans to customers, who are predominately small- and medium-sized businesses and individuals.

On December 31, 2010, California General Bank acquired 100 percent of the outstanding common stock of Professional Business Bank and immediately changed the name of the merged bank to Professional Business Bank. During 2010 California General Bank converted from a national to a state-chartered bank in anticipation of the merger. In connection with the merger, the Company also formed CGB Asset Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary, in order to hold certain troubled assets acquired in the merger.

On May 31, 2012, the Company completed its merger with a public company, Manhattan Bancorp.  Immediately prior to the merger with Manhattan Bancorp, the Company merged into its subsidiary, Professional Business Bank, in a common control transaction accounted for using the historical balances of the Company and the Bank.

The Bank then merged into Bank of Manhattan with Bank of Manhattan as the surviving institution. Total assets of the merged entities approximate $470 million based upon the fair value of the transaction in the preliminary purchase price allocation as of May 31, 2012.  Application of the accounting standards to this reverse merger results in Professional Business Bank being identified as the accounting acquirer in this transaction, and Manhattan Bancorp is the legal acquirer. Therefore, the net assets and liabilities of Professional Business Bank were carried forward in the merger at the historical cost basis.

A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies is as follows:

Basis of presentation: The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) and conform to general practices within the banking industry   In the opinion of Management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods presented have been included. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained therein (and which are included in the Form 8-K in which these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are included).  Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Principles of consolidation: The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its majority-owned subsidiary, Professional Business Bank (the Bank), and its wholly owned subsidiary, CGB Asset Management, Inc. (collectively referred to as the Company). CGB Asset Management, Inc. was sold on March 31, 2011 to a related party. Noncontrolling interest amounts relating to the Company’s majority-owned subsidiary are included within net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest caption in its consolidated statement of operations and within the noncontrolling interest caption in its consolidated balance sheet. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

7

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Reclassifications: Certain amounts in prior presentations have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported shareholders’ equity, net loss or loss per share amounts.

Use of estimates: In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates susceptible to significant change in the near term include the allowance for loan losses, deferred tax assets and the fair value of assets and liabilities.

Business combinations: The Company applies the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Under the acquisition method, the acquiring entity in a business combination recognizes 100 percent of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their acquisition date fair values. Management utilizes valuation techniques appropriate for the asset or liability being measured in determining these fair values. Any excess of the purchase price over amounts allocated to assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. When amounts allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed are greater than the purchase price, a bargain purchase gain is recognized. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.

Investment securities: Investment securities are classified as available-for-sale and recorded at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from net income and reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income included in stockholders’ equity. Premiums or discounts on available-for-sale securities are amortized or accreted into income using the interest method. Realized gains or losses on sales of available-for-sale securities are recorded using the specific identification method.

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) at least on a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluation. Declines in the fair value of individual available-for-sale securities below their cost that are other than temporary result in write-downs of the individual securities to their fair value. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent and ability of the Bank to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. If it is probable that the issuer of the security will be unable to pay all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the debt security, then OTTI will be recognized and the security will be written down to fair value.

If the Company intends to sell an impaired security, the Company records an other-than-temporary loss in an amount equal to the entire difference between fair value and amortized cost. If a security is determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, but the Company does not intend to sell the security, only the credit portion of the estimated loss is recognized in earnings, with the other portion of the loss recognized in other comprehensive income.

Acquired loans: Acquired loans from the business combination include both nonperforming loans with evidence of credit deterioration since their origination date and performing loans with no such credit deterioration. The Company is accounting for a significant majority of the loans, including loans with evidence of credit deterioration acquired in the transaction in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 310-30, Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer, formerly known as Statement of Position (SOP) 03-3.

8

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.   Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

At the date of acquisition, the Company recorded the loans at their fair value. In accordance with ASC 310-30, the Company has pooled performing loans at the date of purchase. The loans were aggregated into pools based on common risk characteristics.

The difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition and the investment in the loan, or the “accretable yield,” is recognized as interest income on a level-yield method over the life of the loan. Contractually required payments for interest and principal that exceed the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition, or the “nonaccretable difference,” are not recognized as a yield adjustment, loss accrual or valuation allowance. Increases in expected cash flows subsequent to the initial investment are recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield on the loan over its remaining life. Decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairment. If the Company does not have the information necessary to reasonably estimate cash flows to be expected, it may use the cost recovery method or cash basis method of income recognition. Valuation allowances on these impaired loans reflect only losses incurred after the acquisition (meaning the present value of all cash flows expected at acquisition that ultimately are not to be received).

Originated loans: Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances reduced by any charge-offs, net of deferred loan fees or costs, unearned discounts, fair value valuation allowances and net of allowance for loan losses or specific valuation accounts. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are capitalized and recognized as an adjustment of the yield of the related loan. Interest on loans is accrued daily and recognized over the terms of the loans and is calculated using the simple-interest method based on principal amounts outstanding.

Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are designated as nonaccrual loans. Generally, the accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when principal or interest is past due 90 days based on the contractual terms of the loan or when, in the opinion of management, there is reasonable doubt as to collectability. When loans are placed on nonaccrual status, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period interest income. Income on nonaccrual loans is subsequently recognized only to the extent that cash is received and the loan’s principal balance is deemed collectable. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought current with respect to interest and principal for a period of at least six months and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to all principal and interest.

The Company’s loan portfolio consists primarily of the following loan types:

·      Construction loans: Construction loans consist of vacant land and property that is in the process of improvement. Repayment of these loans can be dependent on the sale of the property to third parties or the successful completion of the improvements by the builder for the end user. In the event a loan is made on property that is not yet improved for the planned development, there is the risk that approvals will not be granted or will be delayed. Construction loans also run the risk that improvements will not be completed on time or in accordance with specifications and projected costs. Construction real estate loans generally have terms of one year to 18 months during the construction period and interest rates based on a designated index.

·      Commercial real estate loans: Commercial real estate loans are primarily secured by apartment buildings, office and industrial buildings, warehouses, small retail shopping centers and various special purpose properties, including hotels, restaurants and nursing homes. Although terms vary, commercial real estate loans generally have amortizations of 15 to 25 years, as well as balloon payments of two to five years, and terms which provide that the interest rates thereon may be adjusted annually at the Company’s discretion, based on a designated index.

9

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.   Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

·      Residential multifamily real estate: Residential multifamily loans generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than residential real estate loans due to the reliance on the successful operation of the project. This loan type is sensitive to adverse economic conditions.

·      Commercial and industrial loans: Commercial and industrial loans are loans for commercial, corporate and business purposes, including issuing letters of credit. The Company’s commercial business loan portfolio is comprised of loans for a variety of purposes and generally is secured by equipment, machinery and other business assets. Commercial business loans generally have terms of five years or less and interest rates that float in accordance with a designated published index. Substantially all of such loans are secured and backed by the personal guarantees of the owners of the business.

·      Residential 1-4 family real estate loans: Residential real estate loans are generally smaller in size and are homogenous because they exhibit similar characteristics.

·      Consumer: Consumer loans generally have higher interest rates than mortgage loans. The risk involved in consumer loans is the type and nature of the collateral and, in certain cases, the absence of collateral. Consumer loans include second mortgage and home equity loans, education loans, vehicle loans and other secured and unsecured loans that have been made for a variety of consumer purposes.

Allowance for loan losses: The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that collectability of the principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb estimated losses relating to specifically identified loans, as well as probable credit losses inherent in the balance of the loan portfolio, based on an evaluation of the collectability of existing loans, prior loss experience and peer bank loss experience. This evaluation also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to make additions to the allowance based on their judgment about information available to them at the time of their examinations.

When establishing the allowance for loan losses, management categorizes loans into risk categories generally based on the nature of the collateral and the basis of repayment. These risk categories are pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. The relevant risk characteristics of these risk categories are more fully described in Note 3.

10

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.   Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

The allowance consists of two primary components, specific reserves related to impaired loans and general reserves for inherent losses related to loans that are not impaired. For such loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan are lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component of the allowance covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical and peer banks’ loss experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Company and peer banks over the most recent three years. This actual loss experience is supplemented with other economic and qualitative factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These economic and qualitative factors include consideration of the following: levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans; levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards; other changes in lending policies, procedures and practices; experience, ability and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; national and local economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; and effects of changes in credit concentrations.

A loan is impaired when it is probable, based on current information and events, the Company will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest payments due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured on an individual basis for commercial and construction loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The amount of impairment, if any, and any subsequent changes are included in the allowance for loan losses.

Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

Commercial and commercial real estate loans are individually evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and residential real estate loans, may collectively be evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are not separately identified for impairment disclosures.

All loans on nonaccrual status are considered to be impaired; however, not all impaired loans are on nonaccrual status. Impaired loans on accrual status are loans that continue to pay as agreed. Factors that contribute to a performing loan being classified as impaired include payment status, collateral value, probability of collecting scheduled payments, delinquent taxes and debts to other lenders that cannot be serviced out of existing cash flow.

A troubled debt restructuring is a loan which the Company, for reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to a borrower that the Company would not otherwise consider. The loan terms which have been modified or restructured due to a borrower’s financial difficulty include, but are not limited to, a reduction in the stated interest rate, an extension of the maturity at an interest rate below market, a reduction in the face amount of the debt, and a reduction in the accrued interest or extension, deferral, renewal or rewrite. Under ASC 310, Receivables, troubled debt restructurings are considered

11

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.   Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

impaired loans and are evaluated for the amount of impairment, with the appropriate allowance for loan loss adjustment.

Troubled debt restructurings are separately identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at inception. If a troubled debt is considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported at the fair value of the collateral. For troubled debt restructurings that subsequently default, the Bank determines the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy for the allowance for loan losses.

The restructured loans may be classified “special mention” or “substandard” depending on the severity of the modification. Loans that were paid current at the time of modification may be upgraded in their classification after a sustained period of repayment performance, usually six months or longer.

Loans that are past due at the time of modification are classified “substandard” on nonaccrual status. Those loans may be upgraded in their classification and placed on accrual status once there is a sustained period of repayment performance (usually six months or longer) and there is a reasonable assurance that the repayment will continue. Generally, until a loan that is a troubled debt restructure (TDR) is paid in full or otherwise settled, sold, or charged off, the loan must be reported as a TDR.

Core deposit intangible: The Company has a premium on acquired deposits which represents the intangible value of deposit relationships resulting from deposit liabilities assumed in business combinations accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.  Core deposit intangible assets are amortized over seven years. The Company evaluates the remaining useful lives of its core deposit intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization. If the estimate of an intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, the remaining carrying amount of the intangible asset is amortized prospectively over the revised remaining useful life. The balance of the core deposit intangible, net of accumulated amortization, at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is $1.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively.  Amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 totaled $78 thousand and $83 thousand, respectively.  Amortization of the core deposit intangible, totaling approximately $300 thousand per year, is expected to continue until the asset is fully amortized in 2017.

Earnings per share: Basic earnings per share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there were no awards outstanding which were considered common stock equivalents for diluted EPS purposes as they would be anti-dilutive as a result of operating losses incurred.  See Note 7 for information about share-based awards.

12

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.   Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Fair value measurement: Applicable accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the valuation inputs used to measure fair value and clarifies assumptions about risk and the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset.

Fair value is defined in the accounting standards as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Accounting standards also establish a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes the following three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

·      Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) or identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

·      Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

·      Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

See Note 8 for additional information.

Subsequent events: The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and disclosure through August 6, 2012, the date on which the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued.

Recent accounting pronouncements: In April 2011, the FASB issued amended accounting and disclosure guidance relating to a creditor’s determination of whether a restructuring is a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments clarify the guidance on a creditor’s valuation of whether it has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. This guidance is effective for annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2012, including interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Bank’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2011, the FASB issued updated accounting guidance related to fair value measurements and disclosures that result in common fair value measurements and disclosures between US GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). This guidance includes amendments that clarify the application of existing fair value measurement requirements, in addition to other amendments that change

13

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.   Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

principles or requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to the presentation of comprehensive income that eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. This guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012, and interim and annual periods thereafter. The Company is currently evaluating which presentation option it will utilize for comprehensive income in its consolidated financial statements. The adoption of this guidance will not impact the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows and will only impact the presentation of other comprehensive income in the consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance that gives both public and nonpublic companies the option to qualitatively determine whether they can bypass the two-step goodwill impairment test described in the accounting standards.  If a company chooses to perform a qualitative assessment and determines that it is more likely than not (a more than fifty percent likelihood) that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, it would then perform step 1 of the annual goodwill impairment test and, if necessary, step 2.  If the results of the qualitative assessment indicate that it is not “more likely than not” that the fair value is less than the carrying value, no further evaluation is necessary. The amended guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2011.  This guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December of 2011, the FASB issued guidance that requires that entities disclose both gross information and net information about instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. This scope would include derivatives, sale and repurchase agreements and reverse sale and repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending arrangements. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements prepared under IFRS. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Retrospective application is required for all comparative periods and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position.

14

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2. Investment Securities

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

There were no investment securities with continuous unrealized losses greater than 12 months at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, gross realized gains on dispositions of securities totaled $527 thousand and $0, respectively.  There were no gross realized losses on disposition of securities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.

Mortgage-backed securities have contractual maturities through 2033; however, the expected maturity will differ from the contractual maturities because borrowers or issuers may have the right to prepay such obligations without penalties.

The Company pledges securities for various purposes, and securities totaling $172 thousand and $7.2 million are pledged as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Note 3. Loans and Allowances for Loan Losses

The Company’s loan portfolio consists primarily of loans to borrowers within Southern California. Although the Company seeks to avoid concentrations of loans to a single industry or based upon a single class of collateral, real estate and real estate-associated businesses are among the principal industries in the Company’s market area, and as a result, the Company’s loan and collateral portfolios are, to some degree, concentrated in those industries. The Company’s loan policy requires that sufficient collateral, which consists primarily of real estate, be obtained as necessary to meet the Company’s relative risk criteria for each borrower.

Commercial and residential multifamily real estate loans represent 67 percent of total loans as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. A substantial decline in the performance of the economy in general or a continued decline in real estate values in the Company’s primary market area in particular could have an adverse impact on collectability, increase the level of real estate-related nonperforming loans, or have

15

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 3. Loans and Allowances for Loan Losses (Continued)

other adverse effects, which alone or in the aggregate could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.

The composition of the Company’s loans is as follows (dollars in thousands):

The total contractual outstanding amount for loans under ASC 310-30 are $101.6 million and $106.9 million for March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

The excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the initial fair value of acquired loans is referred to as accretable yield and is accreted into interest income over the estimated life of the acquired loans using the effective yield method. The accretable yield will change due to:

·      Estimate of the remaining life of acquired loans which may change the amount of future interest income

·      Estimate of the amount of contractually required principal and interest payments over the estimated life that will not be collected (the nonaccretable difference)

·      Indices for acquired loans with variable rates of interest

·      Improvement in the amount of expected cash flows

16

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 3.   Loans and Allowances for Loan Losses (Continued)

The following table reflects changes in accretable yield of acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 (dollars in thousands):

The following table reflects changes in nonaccretable yield of acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 (dollar in thousands):

The historical performance of the acquired loan portfolio indicates that the credit quality is performing better than originally estimated. Acquired loans with no evidence of credit deterioration also performed better than originally estimated. The better-than-expected performance of acquired loans resulted in a decrease to the nonaccretable difference which will result in increased interest income recognition over the remaining life of the loans.

17

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 3.   Loans and Allowances for Loan Losses (Continued)

The following table reflects changes in the allowance for loan losses for acquired loans for the three months ended March 31 (dollars in thousands):

The allowance on acquired loans relates specifically to four impaired loans totaling $2.3 million which were not accounted for on a pooled basis and are maintained on a nonaccrual basis.

Allowance for loan losses: A summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses during the three months ended March 31 follows (dollars in thousands):

The following tables provide additional details about the allowance for loan losses and the activity therein, by portfolio segment, as of for the periods indicated in the tables (dollars in thousands):

18

CGB Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 3.   Loans and Allowances for Loan Losses (Continued)