AB&T Financial CORP - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

AB&T Financial CORP Reports

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

file	filename
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER - AB&T Financial CORP	d351830dex312.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER - AB&T Financial CORP	d351830dex311.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - AB&T Financial CORP	Financial_Report.xls
EX-32 - CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER - AB&T Financial CORP	d351830dex32.htm

AB&T FINANCIAL CORPORATION

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from to

Commission File Number: 000-53249

AB&T FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

North Carolina

26-2588442

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

292 W. Main Avenue

Gastonia, North Carolina 28052

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(704) 867-5828

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) YES ¨ NO x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

2,668,205 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value, as of May 14, 2012

AB&T FINANCIAL CORPORATION

INDEX


		Page No.
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Consolidated Balance Sheets – March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011		3

	Consolidated Statements of Operations – Three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011		4

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) – Three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011		5

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity – Three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011		6

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011		7

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		8-23

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		23-30

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		31

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		31

Item 6.	Exhibits		31

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 - Financial Statements

AB&T FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Balance Sheets


	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and due from banks	$	9,738,824		$	4,890,563
Federal funds sold		1,138,498			5,944,001

Total cash and cash equivalents		10,877,322			10,834,564

Time deposits with other banks		3,302,847			3,300,572

Securities available for sale at fair value		36,219,909			36,583,896
Nonmarketable equity securities		1,238,280			1,187,180

Total investments		37,458,189			37,771,076


Loans receivable		158,513,230			163,039,560
Less allowance for loan losses		(3,338,430	)		(3,272,645	)

Loans, net		155,174,800			159,766,915

Premises, furniture and equipment, net		3,704,563			3,741,759
Accrued interest receivable		629,048			686,389
Other real estate owned		5,423,750			5,605,042
Other assets		2,457,607			2,423,592


Total assets	$	219,028,126		$	224,129,909


Liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing transaction accounts	$	12,420,281		$	11,015,012
Interest-bearing transaction accounts		8,080,127			8,612,889
Savings and money market		69,257,159			72,594,258
Time deposits $100,000 and over		33,250,410			22,735,464
Other time deposits		58,183,382			71,493,309

Total deposits	$	181,191,359		$	186,450,932


FHLB advances		19,000,000			19,000,000
Accrued interest payable		82,700			77,580
Other liabilities		201,680			284,017

Total liabilities		200,475,739			205,812,529


Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding – 3,500 at March 31, 2012 and at December 31, 2011		3,440,610			3,434,532
Common stock, $1.00 par value; 11,000,000 shares authorized, 2,678,205 issued at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011		2,678,205			2,678,205
Treasury stock, at cost (10,000 shares at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011)		(55,600	)		(55,600	)
Warrants		136,850			136,850
Capital surplus		21,940,640			21,912,257
Retained deficit		(9,619,304	)		(9,820,211	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		30,986			31,347


Total shareholders’ equity		18,552,387			18,317,380

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	219,028,126		$	224,129,909

See notes to consolidated financial statements

-3-

AB&T FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)


	For the three months ended March 31
	2012		2011
Interest income:
Loans, including fees	$	1,848,490	$	1,806,883
Investment securities, taxable		175,020		84,865
FHLB, interest and dividends		3,387		2,480
Federal funds sold		4,108		6,452
Time deposits with other banks		5,694		3,098

Total		2,036,699		1,903,778


Interest expense:
Time deposits $100,000 and over		147,995		115,581
Other deposits		276,669		305,471
Other interest expense		83,786		61,960

Total		508,450		483,012


Net interest income		1,528,249		1,420,766
Provision (recovery) for loan losses		184,998		(877,138	)

Net interest income after provision (recovery) for loan losses		1,343,251		2,297,904


Other operating income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		120,483		81,595
Gain on sale of loans		9,870		—
Gain on sale of investment securities		38,841		—
Other service charges, commissions and fees		92,375		14,796

Total		261,569		96,391


Other operating expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits		697,614		661,664
Occupancy expense		45,783		52,983
Furniture and equipment expense		54,724		13,452
HELOC pool purchase discount		—		1,002,136
Other real estate expenses		79,967		166,293
Loss on sale and write down of other real estate		31,309		—
Deposit insurance premium		105,000		108,780
Other operating expenses		383,436		361,461

Total		1,397,833		2,366,769


Income before income taxes		206,987		27,526
Income tax expense		—		10,844
Net income	$	206,987	$	16,682


Accretion of preferred stock to redemption value		6,078		6,078
Preferred stock dividends (accrued)		43,750		43,750

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	157,159	$	(33,146	)


Income (Loss) per common share
Basic income (loss) per common share	$	0.06	$	(0.01	)

Diluted income (loss) per common share	$	0.06	$	(0.01	)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

-4-

AB&T FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Unaudited)


	For the three months ended March 31
	2012			2011

Net Income	$	206,987		$	16,682
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available for sale		38,480			(27,929	)
Reclassification of (gains) losses recognized in net income		(38,841	)		—
Income tax benefit (expense)		—			10,878


Total other comprehensive income (loss)		(361	)		(17,051	)


Comprehensive income (loss)	$	206,626		$	(369	)

-5-

AB&T FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

(dollars in thousands except for share data)

(Unaudited)


	Common Stock				Preferred Stock				Treasury Stock					Capital Surplus			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Deficit
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Treasury Stock			Warrants		Capital Surplus						Retained Deficit			Total

Balance, December 31, 2010		2,678,205	$	2,678		3,500	$	3,410	$	(56	)	$	137	$	21,787		$	(62	)	$	(6,540	)	$	21,355

Net income																					16			16

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax																		(17	)					(17	)

Accretion of preferred stock to redemption value								6													(6	)		—

Dividends paid, preferred															(43	)								(43	)

Stock-based employee compensation															46									46


Balance March 31, 2011		2,678,205	$	2,678		3,500	$	3,416	$	(56	)	$	137	$	21,790		$	(79	)	$	(6,530	)	$	21,356


Balance, December 31, 2011		2,678,205	$	2,678		3,500	$	3,435	$	(56	)	$	137	$	21,912		$	31		$	(9,820	)	$	18,317

Net income																					207			207

Other comprehensive income, net of tax																		(1	)					(1	)

Accretion of preferred stock to redemption value								6													(6	)		—

Stock-based employee compensation															29									29


Balance March 31, 2012		2,678,205	$	2,678		3,500	$	3,441	$	(56	)	$	137	$	21,941		$	30		$	(9,619	)	$	18,552

See notes to consolidated financial statements

-6-

AB&T FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

(Unaudited)


	For the three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	206,987		$	16,682
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Provision (recovery) for loan losses		184,998			(877,138	)
Loss (gain) on sale of other real estate		31,309			(3,158	)

Gain on sale of investment securities		(38,841	)		—
Gain on sale of loans		(9,870	)		—
Depreciation and amortization expense		46,372			44,175
Discount accretion and premium amortization		104,953			57,048

(Increase) decrease in interest receivable		57,341			(133,656	)
Increase in interest payable		5,120			8,921
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(33,786	)		64,665
Decrease in other liabilities		(82,337	)		(167,668	)
Discount on purchased loans		—			1,002,136
Stock based compensation expense		28,383			46,104

Net cash provided by operating activities		500,629			58,111


Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of securities available for sale		(4,990,085	)		(1,107,865	)
Calls and maturities of securities available for sale		1,111,103			751,880
Net decrease (increase) in loans receivable		3,822,245			(29,132,425	)
Proceeds from sale of loans		465,550			4,058,458
Proceeds from sale of available for sale securities		4,176,265			514,943

Purchase of time deposits in other banks		(2,275	)		(2,683	)
Purchase of equity securities		(51,100	)		—
Proceeds from sale of other real estate		294,145			725,353
Capitalized other real estate expenses		(14,970	)		(375,823	)
Purchases of premises, furniture, and equipment		(9,176	)		(9,114	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		4,801,702			(24,577,276	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Net (decrease) increase in demand deposits, interest- bearing transaction accounts and savings accounts		(2,464,592	)		11,496,348
Net increase (decrease) in certificates of deposit and other time deposits		(2,794,981	)		25,863,822
Repayment of borrowed funds and FHLB advances		—			(5,640,597	)
Dividends paid		—			(43,750	)

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		(5,259,573	)		31,675,823

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		42,758			7,161,036
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		10,834,564			8,075,241


Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	10,877,322		$	15,236,277


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Transfer of loans to real estate acquired in settlement of loans	$	129,192		$	—

Interest paid	$	503,330		$	474,091

Taxes paid	$	—		$	—

See notes to consolidated financial statements

-7-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Organization

AB&T Financial Corporation (the “Company”), was incorporated under the laws of the State of North Carolina on June 25, 2007. On May 14, 2008, the Company became the sole owner of all the shares of the capital stock of Alliance Bank & Trust Company (the “Bank”). Alliance Bank & Trust Company is a state-chartered bank which was organized and incorporated under the laws of the State of North Carolina in September 2004. The Bank is not a member of the Federal Reserve System. The Bank commenced operations on September 8, 2004.

The Bank is headquartered in Gastonia, North Carolina and currently conducts business in two North Carolina counties through four full service branch offices. The principal business activity of the Bank is to provide commercial banking services to domestic markets, principally in Gaston and Cleveland counties. As a state-chartered bank, the Bank is subject to regulation by the North Carolina Office of the Commissioner of Banks and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company is also regulated, supervised and examined by the Federal Reserve. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the parent company and its wholly-owned subsidiary after elimination of all significant intercompany balances and transactions.

Note 2 – Enforcement Action

Effective February 1, 2012, the Bank stipulated to the issuance of a Consent Order (the “Order”) issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks (the “Commissioner”). Although the Bank neither admitted nor denied any unsafe or unsound banking practices or violations of law or regulation, it agreed to the Order, which under the terms of the Order, the Bank is required, among other things, to do the following: increase Board participation in the affairs of the Bank and establish a program to oversee compliance with the Order; ensure that the Bank has and retains qualified management and develop a written management plan based upon the findings of an independent third party management assessment; achieve and maintain (i) a total risk based capital ratio of at least 11%, and (ii) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 8%; charge off all assets classified as “Loss” and 50% of those assets classified as “Doubtful;” develop a comprehensive policy for determining the adequacy of the Bank’s ALLL; formulate a plan to reduce the risk exposure for each asset or relationship in excess of $250,000 classified as “Substandard” or “Doubtful;” refrain from extending credit to any borrower whose extension of credit has been, in whole or in part, charged-off or classified as “Loss” or “Doubtful” and is uncollected; refrain from extending credit to any borrower who has a loan or other extension of credit from the Bank that has been classified as “Substandard;” perform a risk segmentation analysis on and develop a written plan to systematically reduce and monitor the Bank’s concentration of credit in revolving 1–4 family residential property loans; review and revise its loan review and grading system; review and revise the Bank’s strategic plan and comprehensive budget; review and revise its liquidity, contingent funding and asset liability management plan; develop and implement a written policy for interest rate management; and eliminate and/or correct all violations of rules and regulations noted by the Bank’s regulators.

The Order further prohibits the Bank from declaring or paying dividends or bonuses without prior regulatory approval. The Bank may not accept, renew, or roll over any brokered deposits unless it is in compliance with FDIC regulations governing brokered deposits. Furthermore, while the Consent Order is in effect, the Bank must notify its regulators at least sixty days prior to undertaking asset growth that exceeds 10% or more per year.

The Company intends to take all actions necessary to enable the Bank to comply with the requirements of the Consent Order. There can be no assurance that the Bank will be able to comply fully with the provisions of the Consent Order, and the determination of our compliance will be made by the FDIC and the Commissioner. Failure to meet the requirements of the Consent Order could result in additional regulatory action.

Quarterly written progress reports to the FDIC and Commissioner are required by the Order.

Due to the Bank’s recent receipt of the Consent Order, the Bank is not in compliance with its terms as of the filing date of these financial statements. However management and the Board are aggressively working to fulfill the terms of the agreement.

On May 7, 2012 as a follow on the Order, the Company entered into a formal agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. A form 8-K was filed on May 11, 2012, with a copy of the formal agreement.

Note 3 – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements for interim financial statements and, accordingly, they are consolidated to omit disclosures, which would substantially duplicate those contained in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statements as of March 31, 2012 and for the interim periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation. The financial information as of December 31, 2011 has been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date. For further information, refer to the financial statements and the notes included in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2012.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) which requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. In addition, they affect the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

In preparing these financial statements, the Company has evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date the financial statements were issued.

Certain amounts in the 2011 consolidated financial statements were reclassified to conform to the 2012 presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on shareholders’ equity or results of operations as previously presented.

Note 4 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The following is a summary of recent authoritative pronouncements that could impact the accounting, reporting, and disclosure of financial information by the Company.

In April 2011, the criteria used to determine effective control of transferred assets in the Transfers and Servicing topic of the ASC was amended by ASU 2011-03. The requirement for the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms and the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion were removed from the assessment of effective control. The other criteria to assess effective control were not changed. The amendments were effective for the Company on January 1, 2012 and had no effect on the financial statements.

-8-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 4 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements – continued

ASU 2011-04 was issued in May 2011 to amend the Fair Value Measurement topic of the ASC by clarifying the application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and by changing particular principles or requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments were effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012 and the additional disclosures are reflected in Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements.

The Comprehensive Income topic of the ASC was amended in June 2011. The amendment eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income as a part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendment requires consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income and requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income on the face of the financial statements. The amendments were effective for the Company on January 1, 2012 and are applied retrospectively.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

-9-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 5 – Income (loss) per common share

Basic income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive common share equivalents using the treasury stock method. No dilutive common share equivalents were included in the calculation because their effect would be anti-dilutive for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.


	Three months ended March 31, 2012
	Income (Numerator)			Shares (Denominator)		Per Share Amount
Basic income per share
Income available to common shareholders	$	157,159			2,668,205	$	0.06

Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options		—			—


Dilutive income per share
Income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions	$	157,159			2,668,205	$	0.06


	Three months ended March 31, 2011
	Income (Numerator)			Shares (Denominator)		Per Share Amount
Basic loss per share
Loss available to common shareholders	$	(33,146	)		2,668,205	$	(0.01	)

Effect of dilutive securities
Stock options		—			—


Dilutive loss per share
Loss available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions	$	(33,146	)		2,668,205	$	(0.01	)

-10-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which provides a framework for measuring and disclosing fair value under generally accepted accounting principles. ASC Topic 820 requires disclosures about the fair value of assets and liabilities recognized in the balance sheet in periods subsequent to initial recognition, whether the measurements are made on a recurring basis (for example, available for sale investment securities) or on a nonrecurring basis (for example, impaired loans).

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:


Level 1		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as U.S. Treasuries, other securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets and money market funds.

Level 2		Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments, mortgage-backed securities, municipal bonds, corporate debt securities, and derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain derivative contracts and impaired loans. Our available for sale investments are valued using a pricing service through our bond record keeper, which we have verified with a third party.

Level 3		Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. For example, this category generally includes certain private equity investments, retained residual interests in securitizations, residential mortgage servicing rights, and highly-structured or long-term derivative contracts.

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows as of March 31, 2012:


	Quoted market price in active markets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
Available for sale investments:
U.S. Agency securities	$	—	$	19,020,302	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities				17,199,607


Total	$	—	$	36,219,909	$	—

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows as of December 31, 2011:


	Quoted market price in active markets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
Available for sale investments:
U.S. Agency securities	$	—	$	14,447,699	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities		—		22,136,197		—


Total	$	—	$	36,583,896	$	—

The Company had no liabilities carried at fair value or measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

-11-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements (continued)

The Company had no liabilities carried at fair value or measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

The Company is predominantly an asset based lender with real estate serving as collateral on a substantial majority of loans. Loans which are deemed to be impaired are primarily valued on a nonrecurring basis at the fair values of the underlying real estate collateral. Such fair values are obtained using independent appraisals, which the Company considers to be Level 3 inputs. Appraisals are updated annually, and adjusted downward for estimated selling costs.

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2012, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:


	Fair Value at March 31, 2012		Valuation Technique	Significant Unobservable Inputs	Significant Unobservable Input Value

Impaired Loans	$	24,674,847	Appraised Value/ Discounted Cash Flows/	Appraisals and/or sales of comparable properties/ Independent quotes	n/a

OREO	$	5,423,750	Appraised Value/ Comparable Sales/ Other Estimates from Independent Sources	Appraisals and/or sales of comparable properties/ Independent quotes/bids	n/a

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2011, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:


	Fair Value at December 31, 2011		Valuation Technique	Significant Unobservable Inputs	Significant Unobservable Input Value

Impaired Loans	$	24,312,809	Appraised Value/ Discounted Cash Flows/	Appraisals and/or sales of comparable properties/ Independent quotes	n/a

OREO	$	5,605,042	Appraised Value/ Comparable Sales/ Other Estimates from Independent Sources	Appraisals and/or sales of comparable properties/ Independent quotes/bids	n/a

-12-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements (continued)

Other real estate owned is adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans at foreclosure. Subsequently, the assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, fair values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or current appraised value, the Company records the asset as nonrecurring Level 3 inputs.

Level 3 Valuation Methodologies

Impaired loans are loans recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, the Company measures impairment. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value and discounted cash flows and, in rare cases, the market value of the note. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the net present value of the expected cash flows or fair value of the collateral less costs to sell exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, a majority of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an executed sales contract with an independent third party, the Company records the impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 1. If the collateral is based on another observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or the Company determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3. Impaired loans can also be evaluated for impairment using the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. The measurement of impaired loans using future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate rather than the market rate of interest is not a fair value measurement and is therefore excluded from fair value disclosure requirements. Impaired loans are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.

Foreclosed real estate and repossessed personal property. Foreclosed real estate and repossessed personal property is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less estimated selling costs. Fair value is generally based upon current appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates of value obtained principally from independent sources, adjusted for selling costs. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the asset as nonrecurring Level 2. However, the Company also considers other factors or recent developments which could result in adjustments to the collateral value estimates indicated in the appraisals such as changed in absorption rates or market conditions from the time of valuation. In situations where management adjustments are significant to the fair value measurements in its entirety, such measurements are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy.

The following presents the carrying amount, fair value, and placement in the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. This table excludes financial instruments for which the carrying amount approximates fair value. For short-term financial assets such as cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to the relatively short time between the origination of the instrument and its expected realization. For financial liabilities such as noninterest-bearing demand, interest-bearing demand, and savings deposits, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to these products having no stated maturity.

In accordance with ASC Topic 825, the Company has not included assets and liabilities that are not financial instruments in its disclosure, such as the value of the long-term relationships with the Company’s deposit, net premises and equipment, net core deposit intangibles, deferred taxes and other assets and liabilities. Additionally, the amounts in the table have not been updated since the date indicated; therefore the valuations may have changed since that point in time. For these reasons, the total of the fair value calculations presented does not represent, and should not be construed to represent, the underlying value of the Company.

The following disclosures represent financial instruments in which the ending balance at March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011 are not carried at fair value in its entirety on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Loans - Fair values were generally determined by discounting both principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected using an observable discount rate for similar instruments with adjustments that the Company believes a market participant would consider in determining fair value. The Company estimates the cash flows expected to be collected using internal credit risk, interest rate and prepayment risk models that incorporate the Company’s best estimate of current key assumptions, such as default rates, loss severity and prepayment speeds for the life of the loan.

Deposits - The fair value for certain deposits with stated maturities was calculated by discounting contractual cash flows using current market rates for instruments with similar maturities. For deposits with no stated maturities, the carrying amount was considered to approximate fair value and does not take into account the significant value of the cost advantage and stability of the Company’s long-term relationships with depositors.

FHLB Advances - The Company uses quoted market prices for its long-term debt when available. When quoted market prices are not available, fair value is estimated based on current market interest rates and credit spreads for debt with similar maturities.

-13-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements (continued)

The carrying and fair values of certain financial instruments at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:


					Fair Value Measurements
*(dollars in thousands)*	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

March 31, 2012
Financial Instruments - Assets
Loans	$	155,175	$	148,492	$	—	$	—	$	148,492

Financial Instruments – Liabilities
Total Deposits		181,191		181,003		—		181,003		—
FHLB advances		19,000		19,198		—		19,198		—

December 31, 2011
Financial Instruments - Assets
Loans	$	159,767	$	157,293	$		$	—	$	157,293

Financial Instruments – Liabilities
Total Deposits		186,451		186,086		—		186,086		—
FHLB advances		19,000		19,338		—		19,338		—

Note 8 – Investment Securities

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities available for sale were:


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized				Estimated Fair Value
	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses		Estimated Fair Value
March 31, 2012
U.S. Government agency securities	$	17,221,730	$	13,532	$	35,655	$	17,199,607
Mortgage-backed securities		18,947,031		138,894		65,623		19,020,302


Total	$	36,168,761	$	152,426	$	101,278	$	36,219,909


December 31, 2011
U.S. Government agency securities	$	14,459,782	$	15,842	$	27,925	$	14,447,699
Mortgage-backed securities		22,072,375		98,033		34,211		22,136,197


Total	$	36,532,157	$	113,875	$	62,136	$	36,583,896

The following is a summary of maturities of securities available for sale as of March 31, 2012. The amortized cost and estimated fair values are based on the contractual maturity dates. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalty.


	Securities Available-for-Sale
	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	130,537	$	130,917
Due after one year but within five years		9,767,705		9,784,908
Due after five years but within ten years		12,570,432		12,589,464
Due after ten years		13,700,087		13,714,620


	$	36,168,761	$	36,219,909

-14-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 7 – Investment Securities (continued)

The following table shows gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category, and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


	Less than twelve months				Twelve months or more				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized losses		Fair Value		Unrealized losses		Fair Value		Unrealized losses
March 31, 2012
U.S. Government agency securities	$	7,919,493	$	35,655	$	—	$	—	$	7,919,493	$	35,655
Mortgage-backed securities		5,820,281		60,752		550,137		4,871		6,370,418		65,623


Total	$	13,739,774	$	96,407	$	550,137	$	4,871	$	14,289,911	$	101,278


	Less than twelve months				Twelve months or more				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized losses		Fair Value		Unrealized losses		Fair Value		Unrealized losses
December 31, 2011
U.S. Government agency securities	$	6,364,844	$	27,925	$	240,914	$	2,241	$	6,605,758	$	30,166
Mortgage-backed securities		5,204,043		31,970		—		—		5,204,043		31,970


Total	$	11,568,887	$	59,895	$	240,914	$	2,241	$	11,809,801	$	62,136

Securities classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair market value. Securities in a continuous loss position for twelve months or more at March 31, 2012, consisted of two securities. Of the securities in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2012, the Company does not intend to sell the securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost. The Company believes, based on industry analyst reports and credit ratings, that the deterioration in value is attributable to changes in market interest rates and is not in the credit quality of the issuer and therefore, these losses are not considered other-than-temporary.

Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities totaled $4,176,265 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, resulting in gross gains of $38,841. Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities totaled $514,943 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Note 8 – Loans Receivable

Major classifications of loans receivable at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:


	2012		2011
Real estate – construction	$	13,998,775	$	14,388,838
Real estate – commercial		59,221,710		61,432,346
Real estate – residential		64,284,547		65,843,085
Commercial and industrial		20,178,709		20,827,193
Consumer and other		829,489		548,098


Total gross loans	$	158,513,230	$	163,039,560

-15-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 8 – Loans Receivable (continued)

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, loans individually evaluated and considered impaired were as follows:


	2012		2011

Total loans considered impaired at period end	$	24,674,847	$	24,312,809

Loans considered impaired for which there is a related allowance for loan loss:

Outstanding loan balance		11,294,205		11,549,090
Related allowance established		1,588,526		1,524,967

Loans considered impaired for which no related allowance for loan loss was established		13,380,642		12,763,719

Average annual investment in impaired loans		28,862,561		29,156,825

Interest income recognized on impaired loans
During the period of impairment
Cash basis		916,945		757,680

The following table represents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment on impairment method as of March 31, 2012:


	Real Estate						Commercial and Industrial		Consumer and Other
	Construction		Commercial		Residential		Commercial and Industrial		Consumer and Other		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Ending balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	394,043	$	596,117	$	501,312	$	97,054	$	—	$	—	$	1,588,526
Collectively evaluated for impairment		180,800		477,913		490,367		424,931		5,616		170,277		1,749,904

Total	$	574,843	$	1,074,030	$	991,679	$	521,985	$	5,616	$	170,277	$	3,338,430


Loans:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,959,234	$	12,753,807	$	6,266,857	$	677,684	$	17,265	$	—	$	24,674,847
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		9,039,541		46,467,903		35,034,517		19,501,025		812,224		—		110,855,210
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		22,983,173		—		—		—		22,983,173


Total	$	13,998,775	$	59,221,710	$	64,284,547	$	20,178,709	$	829,489	$	—	$	158,513,230

-16-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 8 – Loans Receivable (continued)

The following table represents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment on impairment method as of December 31, 2011:


	Real Estate						Commercial		Consumer
	Construction		Commercial		Residential		and Industrial		and Other		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Ending balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	237,212	$	623,884	$	566,818	$	97,053	$	—	$	—	$	1,524,967
Collectively evaluated for impairment		190,831		375,375		537,799		455,406		6,266		182,001		1,747,678

Total	$	428,043	$	999,259	$	1,104,617	$	552,459	$	6,266	$	182,001	$	3,272,645

Loans:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	5,151,906	$	12,559,956	$	5,865,347	$	716,852	$	18,748	$	—	$	24,312,809
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		9,236,932		48,872,390		36,449,125		20,110,341		529,350		—		115,198,138
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		23,528,613		—		—		—		23,528,613

Total	$	14,388,838	$	61,432,346	$	65,843,085	$	20,827,193	$	548,098	$	—	$	163,039,560

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment as of March 31, 2012:


	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance Allocated		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	121,941	$	121,941	$	—	$	129,737	$	3,262
Consumer & other		17,265		17,265		—		18,394		121
Real estate:
Construction		2,523,735		2,523,735		—		2,820,258		63,417
Mortgage – residential		4,951,199		3,784,281		—		4,915,441		142,299
Mortgage – commercial		8,077,500		6,933,420		—		9,152,747		156,666
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial		555,743		555,743		97,054		573,713		11,060
Real estate:
Construction		2,435,499		2,435,499		394,043		2,439,767		67,137
Mortgage – residential		2,482,576		2,482,576		501,312		2,579,673		254,551
Mortgage – commercial		5,820,387		5,820,387		596,117		6,232,831		218,432

Total	$	26,985,845	$	24,674,847	$	1,588,526	$	28,862,561	$	916,945

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment as of December 31, 2011:


	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Allowance Allocated		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	132,854	$	132,854	$	—	$	164,197	$	7,155
Consumer & other		18,748		18,748		—		21,603		1,379
Real estate:
Construction		2,470,326		2,470,327		—		2,752,629		118,664
Mortgage – residential		4,481,501		3,314,583		—		4,461,693		105,621
Mortgage – commercial		7,971,288		6,827,208		—		9,427,284		323,105
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial		583,998		583,998		97,053		600,966		9,032
Real estate:
Construction		2,681,579		2,681,579		237,212		2,689,031		44,557
Mortgage – residential		2,550,764		2,550,764		566,818		2,646,315		10,757
Mortgage – commercial		5,732,748		5,732,748		623,884		6,393,107		137,410

Total	$	26,623,806	$	24,312,809		1,524,967	$	29,156,825	$	757,680

-17-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 8 – Loans Receivable (continued)

Transactions in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are summarized as follows:


	Real Estate
	Construction		Commercial			Residential			Commercial and Industrial			Consumer and Other			Unallocated			Total
Balance, beginning of year	$	428,043	$	999,259		$	1,104,617		$	552,459		$	6,266		$	182,001		$	3,272,645

Provision charged to operations		144,582		87,858			(6,584	)		(30,473	)		1,340			(11,725	)		184,998
Recoveries		2,218		—			1,319			—			25,194			—			28,731
Charge-offs		—		(13,087	)		(107,673	)		—			(27,184	)		—			(147,944	)

Balance, end of year	$	574,843	$	1,074,030		$	991,679		$	521,986		$	5,616		$	170,276		$	3,338,430

Transactions in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:


	Real Estate
	Construction			Commercial			Residential			Commercial and Industrial		Consumer and Other			Unallocated			Total
Balance, beginning of year	$	1,133,180		$	1,532,386		$	1,690,850		$	636,627	$	6,676		$	226,195		$	5,225,914
Provision (recovery) charged to operations (1)		(480,910	)		(7,894	)		(373,696	)		59,569		25,468			(99,675	)		(877,138	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			1,166		22,008			—			23,174
Charge-offs		—			—			(10,639	)		—		(34,152	)		—			(44,791	)

Balance, end of year	$	652,270		$	1,524,492		$	1,306,515		$	697,362	$	20,000		$	126,520		$	4,327,159

(1)	Amount is net of the reversal of $1,046,479 specific reserves which were recorded on loans sold in conjunction with the HELOC portfolio acquisition. Of the total amount $777,246 related to real estate construction loans and $269,233 related to residential real estate loans.

-18-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 8 – Loans Receivable (continued)

The following table presents the investment in nonaccrual and accruing loans delinquent for 90 days or more as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


	March 31, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Nonaccrual		Accruing loans delinquent for 90 days or more		Nonaccrual		Accruing loans delinquent for 90 days or more

Commercial and industrial	$	206,703	$	—	$	218,676	$	—
Real estate:
Construction		4,398,655		—		3,485,061		—
Mortgage – residential		4,066,767		138,787		4,164,644		—
Mortgage – commercial		6,848,863		—		4,339,334		—
Consumer & other		6,384		—		6,895		—


Total	$	15,527,372	$	138,787	$	12,214,610	$	—

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans and leases as of March 31, 2012:


	30 – 89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due		Nonaccrual Loans		Total Past Due		Loans Not Past Due		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	107,074	$	—	$	206,703	$	313,777	$	19,864,932	$	20,178,709
Real estate:
Construction		—		—		4,398,655		4,398,655		9,600,120		13,998,775
Mortgage – residential		808,076		138,787		4,066,767		5,013,630		59,270,917		64,284,547
Mortgage – commercial		336,252		—		6,848,863		7,185,115		52,036,595		59,221,710
Consumer & other		—		—		6,384		6,384		823,105		829,489


Total	$	1,251,402	$	138,787	$	15,527,372	$	16,917,561	$	141,595,669	$	158,513,230

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans and leases as of December 31, 2011:


	30 – 89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days Past Due		Nonaccrual Loans		Total Past Due		Loans Not Past Due		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	27,499	$	—	$	218,676	$	246,175	$	20,581,018	$	20,827,193
Real estate:
Construction		470,688		—		3,485,061		3,955,749		10,433,089		14,388,838
Mortgage – residential		249,040		—		4,164,644		4,413,684		61,429,401		65,843,085
Mortgage – commercial		654,801		—		4,339,334		4,994,135		56,438,211		61,432,346
Consumer & other		3,799		—		6,895		10,694		537,404		548,098


Total	$	1,405,827	$	—	$	12,214,610	$	13,620,437	$	149,419,123	$	163,039,560

-19-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 8 – Loans Receivable – continued

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes loans with an outstanding balance greater than $0.5 million or $1.0 million, depending on loan type, and non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial and commercial real estate loans. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis with the most recent analysis performed at September 30, 2011. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention, while still adequately protected by the borrower’s capital adequacy and payment capability, exhibit distinct weakening trends and/or elevated levels of exposure to external conditions. If left unchecked or uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deteriorated prospects of repayment. These exposures require management’s close attention so as to avoid becoming undue or unwarranted credit exposures.

Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the borrower’s current financial condition and payment capability or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the orderly repayment of debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or orderly repayment in full, on the basis of current existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific factors that may work to the advantage and strengthening of the exposure, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined.

Loss. Loans classified as loss are considered to be non-collectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This does not mean the loan has absolutely no recovery value, but rather it is neither practical nor desirable to defer writing off the loan, even though partial recovery may be obtained in the future. Losses are taken in the period in which they surface as uncollectible.

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans and leases. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the risk category of loans and leases is as follows:

March 31, 2012


	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	15,908,245	$	3,893,505	$	376,959	$	—	$	—	$	20,178,709
Real estate:
Construction		7,997,411		1,136,916		4,864,448		—		—		13,998,775
Mortgage – residential		54,569,672		3,928,459		5,786,416		—		—		64,284,547
Mortgage – commercial		40,306,051		9,017,171		9,898,488		—		—		59,221,710
Consumer & other		802,309		9,915		17,265		—		—		829,489

Total	$	119,583,688	$	17,985,966	$	20,943,576	$	—	$	—	$	158,513,230

December 31, 2011


	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	16,442,783	$	3,992,117	$	392,293	$	—	$	—	$	20,827,193
Real estate:
Construction		6,661,777		2,671,055		5,056,006		—		—		14,388,838
Mortgage – residential		55,509,327		4,952,469		5,381,288		—		—		65,843,084
Mortgage – commercial		45,775,112		5,955,956		9,701,279		—		—		61,432,347
Consumer & other		518,579		10,771		18,748		—		—		548,098

Total	$	124,907,578	$	17,582,368	$	20,549,614	$	—	$	—	$	163,039,560

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company does not have loans defined as subprime.

On March 25, 2011, the Company completed a loan “swap” transaction accounted for as a transfer of financial assets, which included the purchase of a pool of residential mortgage home equity loans with a par value of $27,095,572 (an estimated fair value of $26,093,437). The residential mortgage home equity loan portfolio (portfolio) was purchased from a private equity firm in exchange for a combination of $4,058,458 in unpaid principal balance of certain non-performing loans and cash of $20,328,049. The non-performing loans were transferred without recourse and were carried at fair value prior to the exchange, in accordance with accounting standards. The Company obtained a third party valuation of the assets and will amortize approximately $850,000 in loan purchase adjustment (as a result of the fair value measurement) as a yield adjustment over the expected life of the loans. As a result of the transaction, the Company recorded a discount on the purchased loans of $1,002,136 and was able to eliminate $1,046,479 in recorded specific loan loss reserves. As of March 31, 2012 the bank held $986,981 in cash reserves against any future loan defaults. As such, there is no additional allowance provided for the HELOC portfolio. The Bank reviews the sufficiency of the cash reserves on a quarterly basis to determine if an additional provision for loan loss should be recorded for probable losses in the portfolio.

-20-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 9 – Troubled Debt Restructures

As a result of adopting the amendments in ASU 2011-02, the Bank reassessed all restructurings that occurred on or after the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption (January 1, 2011) to determine whether they are considered troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) under the amended guidance. The Bank identified as TDRs certain loans for which the allowance for loan losses had previously been measured under a general allowance methodology. Upon identifying those loans as TDRs, the Bank identified them as impaired under the guidance in ASC 310-10-35. The amendments in ASU 2011-02 require prospective application of the impairment measurement guidance in ASC 310-10-35 for those loans newly identified as impaired. At the end of the year of adoption (December 31, 2011), the recorded investment in loans for which the allowance was previously measured under a general allowance methodology and were then impaired under ASC 310-10-35 was $9,892,503, and the allowance for loan losses associated with those loans, on the basis of a current evaluation of loss was $381,039. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Bank charged $494,997 to the allowance relating to impairment charges on restructured loans. No additional impairment charges were incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

There were no loans modified during the twelve months preceding March 31, 2012 classified as troubled debt restructurings. The Bank only modifies loans that are considered troubled debt restructurings, as no such loans were modified during the stated time period. Restructured loans must perform for six months prior to being returned to accrual status.

The following table, by loan category, presents loans determined to be troubled debt restructurings as of December 31, 2011 which defaulted during the quarter ended March 31, 2012.


	Three months ended March 31, 2012
	Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings
That Subsequently Defaulted
During the Period:
Commercial and industrial		—	$	—
Consumer and other		—		—
Real estate:
Construction		1		872,581
Mortgage - residential		2		2,415,920
Mortgage - commercial		—		—

		3	$	3,288,501

In the determination of the allowance for loan losses, all TDRs are reviewed to ensure that one of the three proper valuation methods (fair market value of the collateral, present value of cash flows, or observable market price) is adhered to. All nonaccrual loans are written down to their corresponding collateral value. All TDR accruing loans where the loan balance exceeds the present value of cash flow will have a specific allocation. All TDR loans are considered impaired. Under ASC 310-10, a loan is impaired when it is probable that the bank will be unable to collect all amounts due including both principal and interest according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement.


	As of March 31, 2012
	Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings at Period End:
Accruing:
Commercial and industrial		2	$	381,583
Consumer and other		—		—
Real estate:
Construction		—		—
Mortgage - residential		1		254,115
Mortgage - commercial		2		2,855,319


Total		5		3,491,017


Nonaccruing:
Commercial and industrial		1		27,264
Consumer and other		1		6,384
Real estate:
Construction		2		1,131,573
Mortgage - residential		3		810,698
Mortgage - commercial		6		4,633,121


Total		13		6,609,040


Total Troubled Debt Restructurings		18	$	10,100,057

-21-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 9 – Troubled Debt Restructures – continued


	As of December 31, 2011
	Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings at Period End:
Accruing:
Commercial and industrial		3	$	406,567
Consumer other		—		—
Real estate:
Construction		1		872,581
Mortgage - residential		1		254,115
Mortgage - commercial		4		5,274,597


Total		9		6,807,860


Nonaccruing:
Commercial & Industrial		1		27,984
Consumer & other		1		6,895
Real estate:
Construction		1		258,991
Mortgage - residential		3		811,929
Mortgage - commercial		4		1,978,844

Total		10	$	3,084,643


Total Troubled Debt Restructurings		19	$	9,892,503

-22-

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 10 – Dividends on Series A Preferred Stock Issued to the U.S. Treasury

At the request of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, the Company deferred the quarterly dividend payment on the shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”) commencing with the payment due May 15, 2011. This payment was the first dividend payment deferred. As part of the CPP, the Company entered into a letter agreement with the Treasury on January 23, 2009, which includes a Securities Purchase Agreement-Standard Terms. The Company also amended its articles of incorporation to set forth the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock. Under the Company’s amended articles of incorporation, dividends compound if they accrue and are not paid. A failure to pay a total of six such dividends, whether or not consecutive, gives the Treasury the right to elect two directors to the Company’s Board of Directors. That right would continue until the Company pays all dividends in arrears. As of the date of this report, the total arrearage was $175,000. The Company anticipates paying the accrued dividends in the future to avoid triggering the Treasury’s ability to elect directors to the Company’s Board of Directors.

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is a discussion of the Company’s financial condition as of March 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011, and the results of operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes appearing in this report and in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes and disclosures in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. This report contains “forward-looking statements” relating to, without limitation, future economic performance, plans and objectives of management for future operations, and projections of revenues and other financial items that are based on the beliefs of the Company’s management, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the Company’s management. The words “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “plan,” and “believe,” as well as similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements, and the Company’s operating performance each quarter is subject to various risks and uncertainties that are discussed in detail in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Because the Company has no separate operations and conducts no business on its own other than owning Alliance Bank & Trust Company (the “Bank”), the discussion contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis concerns primarily the business of the Bank. However, for ease of reading and because the financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis, the Company and the Bank are collectively referred to herein as “the Company” unless otherwise noted.

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Alliance Bank & Trust Company (the “Bank”), entered into a Stipulation to the Issuance of a Consent Order (the “Stipulation”) with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and the North Carolina Office of the Commissioner of Banks (the “Commissioner”) and the FDIC and the Commissioner issued the related Consent Order (the “Order”), effective February 1, 2012. The description of the Stipulation and the Order set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Stipulation and the Order, copies of which are filed herewith as exhibits 10.1 and 10.2, respectively, and incorporated herein by reference.

Management. The Bank is required to assess management’s ability to (1) comply with the requirements of the Order; (2) operate the Bank in a safe and sound manner; (3) comply with all applicable laws and regulations; and (4) improve the Bank’s asset quality, capital adequacy, earnings, management effectiveness, risk management, liquidity, and sensitivity to market risk. To assist with this assessment, the Bank must retain a consultant to develop a written analysis and assessment of the Bank’s management needs within 30 days of the effective date of the Order. The consultant’s management report must be developed within 60 days from the effective date of the Order. Within 30 days from receipt of the management report, the Bank must formulate a written management plan that incorporates the findings of the management report, a plan of action in response to each recommendation contained in the management report, and a time frame for completing each action.

Capital Requirements. While the Order is in effect, the Bank must maintain a leverage ratio (the ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets) of at least 8% and a total risk-based capital ratio (the ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets) of at least 11%. If either of these capital ratios is below the required levels as of the date of any call report or regulatory examination, the Bank must, within 30 days from receipt of a written notice of capital deficiency from its regulators, present a plan to increase capital to meet the requirements of the Order.

Charge-Offs, Credits. The Order requires that the Bank eliminate from its books, by charge-off or collection, all assets or portions of assets classified “loss” and 50% of those assets classified “doubtful.” If an asset is classified “doubtful,” the Bank may alternatively charge off the amount that is considered uncollectible in accordance with the Bank’s written analysis of loan or lease impairment. The Order also prevents the Bank from extending, directly or indirectly, any additional credit to, or for the benefit of, any borrower who has a loan or other extension of credit from the Bank that has been charged off or classified, in whole or in part, “loss” or “doubtful” and is uncollected. The Bank may not extend, directly or indirectly, any additional credit to any borrower who has a loan or other extension of credit from the Bank that has been classified “substandard.” These limitations do not apply if the Bank’s failure to extend further credit to a particular borrower would be detrimental to the best interests of the Bank.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses. Within 60 days of the effective date of the Order, the board of directors must review the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses (the “ALLL”) and establish a policy for determining the adequacy of the ALLL.

Concentrations of Credit. Within 90 days from the effective date of the Order, the Bank must perform a risk segmentation analysis with respect to its concentrations of credit and must develop a written plan for systematically reducing and monitoring the Bank’s concentration of credit in revolving 1–4 family residential property loans to an amount commensurate with the Bank’s business strategy, management, expertise, size, and location.

Asset Growth. While the Order is in effect, the Bank must notify its regulators at least 60 days prior to undertaking asset growth that exceeds 10% or more per year or initiating material changes in asset or liability composition. The Bank’s asset growth cannot result in noncompliance with the capital maintenance provisions of the Order unless the Bank receives prior written approval from its regulators.

Restriction on Dividends and Other Payments. While the Order is in effect, the Bank cannot declare or pay dividends, pay bonuses, or pay any form of payment outside the ordinary course of business resulting in a reduction of capital without the prior written approval of its regulators. In addition, the Bank cannot make any distributions of interest, principal, or other sums on subordinated debentures without prior regulatory approval.

Brokered Deposits. The Order provides that the Bank may not accept, renew, or roll over any brokered deposits unless it is in compliance with the requirements of the FDIC regulations governing brokered deposits.

Loan Review. Within 60 days from the effective date of the Order, the Bank must review and revise its internal loan review and grading system to provide for the effective periodic review of the Bank’s loan portfolio in order to identify and categorize the Bank’s loans and other extensions of credit on the basis of credit quality. Within 90 days from the effective date of the Order, the Bank must contract for an external loan review to assess the accuracy of the Bank’s loan grading system and the quality of credit underwriting and administrative practices.

HELOC Portfolio. Within 60 days from the effective date of the Order, the Bank must perform a comprehensive assessment of the risk posed by its home equity line of credit (“HELOC”) portfolio. The Bank must also develop and implement a plan to reduce the risk in the HELOC portfolio.

Agreement with Federal Reserve. On May 7, 2012 as a follow on to the Order, the Company entered into a formal agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. A form 8-K was filed on May 11, 2012, with a copy of the formal agreement.

-23-

Call Reports. As required by the Order, the Bank has filed amended call reports regarding the financial condition of the Bank as of March 31, 2011.

Written Plans and Other Material Terms. Under the terms of the Order, the Bank is required to prepare and submit the following written plans or reports to the FDIC and the Commissioner:

•

Plan to reduce assets of $250,000 or greater classified as “doubtful” or “substandard”

•

Plan and comprehensive budget for all categories of income and expense for the year 2012

•

Business/strategic plan covering the overall operation of the Bank

•

Plan to improve liquidity, contingency funding, interest rate risk, and asset liability management

•

Assessment of the Bank’s information technology function

•

Enterprise-wide disaster recovery/business continuity plan

•

Policy to provide adequate internal routines and controls within the Bank consistent with safe and sound banking practices

•

Independent testing of the Bank’s compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and associated regulations

Under the Order, the Bank’s board of directors has agreed to increase its participation in the affairs of the Bank, including assuming full responsibility for the approval of policies and objectives for the supervision of all of the Bank’s activities. The Bank must also establish a board committee to monitor and coordinate compliance with the Order.

The Order will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the FDIC and the Commissioner.

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, net interest income was $1,528,249 as compared to $1,420,766 for the same period in 2011. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was 1.06% and 1.19%, respectively. The average rate realized on interest-earning assets was 3.93% and 4.23% for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The net interest margin was 2.95% and 3.17% for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease is primarily due to the reversal of a significant accrued interest amount relating to one individual loan relationship that moved to nonaccrual during the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

The following table illustrates the Company’s yield on earning assets and cost of funds for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.


	Three Months Ended March 31
	2012								2011
	Average Daily Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rate			Average Daily Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rate
Interest-earning assets
Loans	$	161,066		$	1,848		4.62	%	$	150,008		$	1,807		4.89	%
Investment securities		36,774			175		1.86	%		17,678			85		1.83	%
Federal funds sold		7,083			4		.23	%		11,550			6		0.23	%
Interest-bearing bank deposits		4,888			6		1.28	%		2,372			3		0.54	%
Nonmarketable equity securities		1,187			4		1.17	%		1,267			3		0.81	%

Total interest-earning assets		210,998			2,037		3.93	%		182,875			1,904		4.23	%

Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		3,465								3,758
Property and equipment		3,729								3,848
Other assets		9,037								9,977
Allowance for loan losses		(3,282	)							(5,267	)

Total noninterest-earning assets		12,949								12,316


Total assets	$	223,947							$	195,191


Interest-bearing liabilities
NOW accounts	$	8,106			13		.64	%	$	7,199			13		0.72	%
Savings and money markets		72,216			198		1.11	%		44,158			163		1.49	%
Time deposits		92,944			213		2.37	%		100,712			245		2.66	%

Federal Home Loan Bank advances		19,000			84		1.74	%		12,322			61		2.00	%
Other borrowings		5			—		0.72	%		202			1		1.25	%


Total interest-bearing liabilities		192,271			508		1.06	%		164,593			483		1.19	%

Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		12,789								8,903
Interest payable and other		330								218


Total noninterest-bearing liabilities		13,119								9,121

Total liabilities		205,390								173,714

Stockholders’ equity		18,557								21,477


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	223,947							$	195,191


Net interest income and interest rate spread				$	1,529		2.87	%				$	1,421		3.04	%


Net yield on average interest-earning assets							2.95	%							3.17	%


Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		109.74	%							111.11	%

-24-

The following table shows changes in interest income, interest expense, and net interest income arising from volume and rate changes for major categories of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The change in interest not solely due to changes in either volume or rates has been allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar change in both.


Volume and Rate Variance Analysis (in thousands)
	Three Months Ended March 31 2012 vs 2011									Three Months Ended March 31 2011 vs 2010
	Increase (Decrease) Due to									Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
Interest income:

Loans	$	(872	)	$	869		$	(3	)	$	160		$	(17	)	$	143
Investment securities		89			1			90			69			(45	)		24
Federal funds sold		2			(4	)		(2	)		(5	)		—			(5	)
Interest-bearing bank deposits		(1	)		3			2			2			(2	)		—

Total interest income		(782	)		869			87			226			(64	)		162

Interest expense:
Interest bearing transaction accounts	$	1		$	(1	)	$	—		$	4		$	(2	)	$	2
Savings and money market		85			(51	)		34			64			4			68
Time deposits		(17	)		(18	)		(35	)		(67	)		(71	)		(138	)

Federal home loan bank advances		57			(35	)		22			—			(15	)		(15	)
Other borrowings		—			—			—			1			—			1

Total interest expense		126			(105	)		21			2			(84	)		(82	)


Net increase (decrease) in net interest income	$	(908	)	$	974		$	66		$	224		$	20		$	244

-25-

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses is the charge to operating earnings that in management’s judgment is necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an adequate level in relation to the risk of future losses inherent in the loan portfolio. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 the provision was $184,998 and $(877,138) respectively. The negative provision in the first quarter of 2011 is due to recapturing amounts that were specifically reserved relating to loans sold. On March 31, 2012, there were $15,527,372 in loans in nonaccrual status. On March 31, 2011, there were $10,905,872 in loans in nonaccrual status. Based on present information, management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate at March 31, 2012 to meet presently known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses was 2.11% and 2.51% of total loans at March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The allowance decreased from prior year (as a percentage of total loans) even with an increase in nonaccrual and classified loans over prior year primarily due to the stabilization of real estate values surrounding the collateral pledged to secure loans. There are risks inherent in making all loans, including risks with respect to the period of time over which loans may be repaid, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions, risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers, and, in the case of a collateralized loan, risks resulting from uncertainties about the future value of the collateral. The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses based on, among other things, historical experience, including management’s experience at other institutions, an evaluation of economic conditions, and regular reviews of delinquencies and loan portfolio quality. Management’s judgment about the adequacy of the allowance is based upon a number of assumptions about future events, which it believes to be reasonable, but which may not prove to be accurate. Thus, there is a risk that charge-offs in future periods could exceed the allowance for loan losses or that substantial additional increases in the allowance for loan losses could be required. Additions to the allowance for loan losses would result in a decrease in the Company’s net income and, possibly, a reduction of its capital.

Noninterest Income

Total noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $261,569 or 171.36% greater than total noninterest income for the same period last year. The largest component of noninterest income for the three month period ended March 31, 2012, was service charges on deposit accounts which were $120,483 for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 or 47.66% higher than the same period last year. Other service charges, commissions and fees for the three months ended March 31, 2012 were $92,375 or 524.32% more than the same period last year. This increase was due to a management fee received by the Company relating to management of a real estate project under a forbearance agreement. In addition, the Bank had $38,841 in securities gains for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 compared to no gains in the prior year.

Noninterest Expense

Total noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $1,397,833 or 41.10% less than total noninterest expense for the same period last year. The decrease is due to the one-time charge relating to the HELOC purchase discount of $1,002,136 recognized in the prior year. The primary recurring component of noninterest expense is salaries and benefits, which were $697,614 and $661,664 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Salaries and benefits increased due to the increase in the number of active employees. Other real estate expenses were $79,967 and $166,293 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease from prior year is primarily due to the payment of past due property taxes on a large piece of property taken into other real estate owned. Other operating expenses were $383,436 and $376,777 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Income Taxes

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the effective income tax rate was 0.00% and 39.39%, respectively. The income tax expense was $0, for the three months ended March 31, 2012 due to the Company having significant unused net operating loss carry forwards. The income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $10,844.

Net Income (loss)

The combination of the above factors resulted in net income available to common shareholders of $157,159 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to net loss available to common shareholders of $33,146 for the comparable period in 2011.

Assets and Liabilities

During the first three months of 2012, total assets decreased $5,101,783 or 2.28% when compared to December 31, 2011. The decrease is primarily due to decrease in loans outstanding. Total investments decreased $312,887, or 0.83% during the three months ended March 31, 2012. Total deposits decreased $5,259,573 or 2.82% when compared to December 31, 2011. Of the total change in deposits over the same period, brokered deposits decreased $10,868,000 to $34,360,000 as of March 31, 2012. The decrease in brokered deposits was due to maturities of the underlying certificates of deposit. In order to comply with the consent agreement, management did not issue any additional brokered deposits during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

The Bank is under the Tier 1 leverage ratio required as a stipulation under the Consent Order as of March 31, 2012. In order the meet the required Tier 1 leverage ratio, the Bank is in the process of gradually shrinking its total assets in order to more promptly comply with the Consent Order stipulations.

Investment Securities

Investment securities totaled $37,458,189 as of March 31, 2012 as compared to $37,771,076 at December 31, 2011. Of this amount, $36,219,909 was designated as available for sale as of March 31, 2012. The other investments were nonmarketable equity securities consisting of $1,193,100 in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and a $45,180 investment in Community Bankers Bank stock as of March 31, 2012.

-26-

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Loans

In an effort to decrease total assets, loans were permitted to decrease $4,526,330, or 2.78%, during the period. As shown below, the largest decrease was in real estate – commercial loans which decreased $2,210,636 or 3.60%, to $59,221,710 at March 31, 2012. Real estate – construction loans decreased $390,063 or 2.71% to $13,998,775. Real estate – residential loans decreased $1,558,538, or 2.37%, to $64,284,547. Consumer and other loans increased $281,391 or 51.34%, to $829,489 at March 31, 2012. Commercial and industrial loans decreased $648,484 or 3.11% to $20,178,709 at March 31, 2012. Balances within the major loans receivable categories as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:


	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Real estate – construction	$	13,998,775	$	14,388,838
Real estate – commercial		59,221,710		61,432,346
Real estate – residential		64,284,547		65,843,085
Commercial and industrial		20,178,709		20,827,193
Consumer and other		829,489		548,098


Total gross loans	$	158,513,230	$	163,039,560

Risk Elements in the Loan Portfolio

Criticized loans are loans that have potential weaknesses that deserve close attention and which could, if uncorrected, result in deterioration of the prospects for repayment of the Company’s credit position at a future date. Classified loans are loans that are inadequately protected by the sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or any collateral and as to which there is a distinct possibility or probability that we will sustain a loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had criticized loans totaling $17,985,965 and $17,582,368, respectively. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had classified loans totaling $20,943,576 and $20,549,614, respectively. At March 31, 2011, the Company had $15,527,372 or 9.80% of total gross loans in nonaccrual status and $138,787 in loans that were 90 days or more past due and still accruing. Based upon the increase in impaired loans in the portfolio from December 31, 2011 to March 31, 2012 the Bank increased the provision for loan losses to $184,998 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This is an increase over the same period last year. In the determination of the allowance for loan losses, all significant (typically greater than $250,000) criticized and classified loans are reviewed for impairment to ensure that one of the three proper valuation methods (fair market value of the collateral, present value of cash flows, or observable market price) is adhered to.

The following tables depict the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

Transactions in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are summarized as follows:


	Real Estate
	Construction		Commercial			Residential			Commercial and Industrial			Consumer & Other			Unallocated			Total
Balance, beginning of year	$	428,043	$	999,259		$	1,104,617		$	552,459		$	6,266		$	182,001		$	3,272,645

Provision charged to operations		144,582		87,858			(6,584	)		(30,473	)		1,340			(11,725	)		184,998
Recoveries		2,218		—			1,319			—			25,194			—			28,731
Charge-offs		—		(13,087	)		(107,673	)		—			(27,184	)		—			(147,944	)

Balance, end of year	$	574,843	$	1,074,030		$	991,679		$	521,986		$	5,616		$	170,276		$	3,338,430

Transactions in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:


	Real Estate
	Construction			Commercial			Residential			Commercial and Industrial		Consumer & Other			Unallocated			Total
Balance, beginning of year	$	1,133,180		$	1,532,386		$	1,690,850		$	636,627	$	6,676		$	226,195		$	5,225,914
Provision (recovery) charged to operations (1)		(480,910	)		(7,894	)		(373,696	)		59,569		25,468			(99,675	)		(877,138	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			1166		22,008			—			23,174
Charge-offs		—			—			(10,639	)		—		(34,152	)		—			(44,791	)

Balance, end of year	$	652,270		$	1,524,492		$	1,306,515		$	697,362	$	20,000		$	126,520		$	4,327,159

(1)	Amount is net of the reversal of $1,046,479 specific reserves which were recorded on loans sold in conjunction with the HELOC portfolio acquisition. Of the total amount $777,246 related to real estate construction loans and $269,233 related to residential real estate loans.

-27-

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued


	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011
Balance, January 1	$	3,272,645		$	5,225,914
Provision (recovery) for loan losses for the period		184,998			(877,138	)
Net loans (charged-off) recovered during the period		(119,213	)		(21,617	)


Balance, March 31,	$	3,338,430		$	4,327,159


Gross loans outstanding, March 31,	$	158,513,230		$	172,339,726

Allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding		2.11	%		2.51	%

Deposits

Total deposits decreased $5,259,573 or 2.82%, from December 31, 2011 to $181,191,359 at March 31, 2012. Total time deposits decreased $2,794,981, or 2.97% to $91,433,792 at March 31, 2012. Total interest-bearing and non-interest bearing transaction accounts increased $872,507 or 4.44% since December 31, 2011. There was a decrease in savings and money market accounts as well, which decreased $3,337,099 or 4.60%, to $69,257,159 at March 31, 2012. This decrease in non time deposit accounts is a combination of the Bank instituting a revised market pricing strategy to emphasize certificates of deposit accounts and implementing a retail initiative focusing on growing the core deposits of the Bank. Brokered deposits represent a source of fixed rate funds priced competitively with Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) but do not require collateralization like FHLB borrowings.

Balances within the major deposit categories as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:


	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Noninterest-bearing transaction accounts	$	12,420,281	$	11,015,012
Interest-bearing transaction accounts		8,080,127		8,612,889
Savings and money market		69,257,159		72,594,258
Time deposits $100,000 and over		33,250,410		22,735,464
Other time deposits		58,183,382		71,493,309


Total deposits	$	181,191,359	$	186,450,932

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank

Advances from the FHLB total $19,000,000 as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The Bank utilizes the advances to fund loans and for general liquidity purposes. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank consisted of the following at March 31, 2012:


Description	Interest Rate			2011
Fixed rate advances maturing:
October 28, 2014		.9475	%	$	11,000,000
November 3, 2014		2.84	%	$	8,000,000


				$	19,000,000

-28-

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion And Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Liquidity

Liquidity needs are met by the Company through cash and short-term investments, and scheduled maturities of loans on the asset side and through pricing policies on the liability side for interest-bearing deposit accounts. The Company also has the capacity to pledge certain loans as collateral for additional borrowings from FHLB during times when the comparable interest rate is favorable to the interest rate on deposit products. As of March 31, 2012, the Company’s primary sources of liquidity included cash and due from banks of $9,738,824, federal funds sold totaling $1,138,498, time deposits with other banks of $3,302,847 and securities available for sale totaling $36,219,909, credit availability with the Federal Home Loan Bank of $14,800,000 and unused lines of credit with correspondent banks to purchase federal funds totaling $2,500,000 at March 31, 2012.

Capital Resources

Total shareholders’ equity increased $235,007 to $18,552,387 for the three month period ended March 31, 2012. This is primarily the result of the net income for the period of $206,987, and stock based compensation expense of $28,383.

The Federal Reserve Board and bank regulatory agencies require bank holding companies and financial institutions to maintain capital at adequate levels based on a percentage of assets and off-balance sheet exposures, adjusted for risk-weights ranging from 0% to 100%. Under the risk-based standard, capital is classified into two tiers. Tier 1 capital consists of common shareholders’ equity, excluding the unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, minus certain intangible assets. Tier 2 capital consists of the general reserve for loan losses subject to certain limitations. An institution’s qualifying capital base for purposes of its risk-based capital ratio consists of the sum of its Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. In order to be considered “adequately capitalized” under federal regulations, a bank generally must have a total risk-based ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 4%, and a Tier 1 capital to average total assets ratio (referred to as the “leverage ratio”) of at least 4%. As such the Bank is under the required leverage ratio as of March 31, 2012. In order the meet the required leverage ratio, the Bank is in the process of gradually shrinking its total assets in order to more promptly comply with the requirements of the Consent Order.

Both the Company and the Bank exceeded their minimum regulatory capital ratios as of March 31, 2012, but due to the additional capital requirements under the Consent Order, the Bank is considered “adequately capitalized.”

The following table summarizes the Company’s risk-based capital at March 31, 2012:


Shareholders’ equity	$	18,552,387
Plus – unrealized (gain) loss on available-for-sale securities		(51,148	)
Less – disallowed deferred tax assets		(1,234,000	)


Tier 1 capital	$	17,267,239

Plus – allowance for loan losses⁽¹⁾		2,020,000


Total capital	$	19,287,239


Risk-weighted assets	$	160,293,000

Risk-based capital ratios:
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		10.77	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		12.03	%
Leverage ratio		7.78	%

(1)	Limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets

-29-

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion And Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Off-Balance Sheet Risk

Through its operations, the Company has made contractual commitments to extend credit in the ordinary course of its business activities. These commitments are legally binding agreements to lend money to the Company’s customers at predetermined interest rates for a specified period of time. At March 31, 2012, the Company had issued commitments to extend credit of approximately $11,273,000 through various types of commercial lending arrangements. All of these commitments to extend credit had variable rates.

The following table sets forth the length of time until maturity for unused commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit at March 31, 2012 (amounts in thousands):


	Within One Month		After One Through Three Months		After Three Through Twelve Months		Greater Than One Year		Total

Unused commitments to extend credit	$	483	$	—	$	1,934	$	8,842	$	11,259
Standby letters of credit		—		—		14		—		14


Totals	$	483	$	—	$	1,948	$	8,842	$	11,273

Based on historical experience, many of the commitments and letters of credit will expire unfunded.

Accordingly, the amounts shown in the table above do not necessarily reflect the Company’s need for funds in the periods shown.

The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on its credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, commercial and residential real estate.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have adopted various accounting policies which govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the financial statements at December 31, 2011 as contained in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by us which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. We consider these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions we use are based on historical experience and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions we make, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates which could have a material impact on our carrying values of assets and liabilities and our results of operations.

We believe the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy that requires the most significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of our financial statements. Refer to the portions of the discussion in this report on Form 10-Q and in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K that address our allowance for loan losses for a description of our processes and methodology for determining our allowance for loan losses.

-30-

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a)	Based on their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in 17 C.F.R. Sections 240.13a-15(e) and 240.15d-15(e)) as of March 31, 2012, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that such controls and procedures were effective.

(b)

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting subsequent to the date of its evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 3. Default Upon Senior Securities

As discussed in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included with Part 1, Item 1, the Company deferred the payment of its regular quarterly cash dividends on its fixed rate cumulative perpetual preferred stock, series A, issued to the United States Department of the Treasury in connection with the Company’s participation in the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program. Therefore, the Company is currently in arrears with the dividend payments on the series A preferred stock. As of March 31, 2012, the amount of the arrearage on the dividend payments for the series A preferred stock was $175,000.

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit Number		Description of Exhibit

10.1		Stipulation to the Issuance of a Consent Order (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2012)

10.2		Consent Order issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the North Carolina Office of the Commissioner of Banks (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2012)

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

32		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 USC 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101		Interactive data files providing financial information from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AB&T Financial Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012, in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language)*

Pursuant to Regulation 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are furnished and not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are otherwise not subject to liability.

-31-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


AB&T FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Registrant)

By:		/s/ Daniel C. Ayscue
		Daniel C. Ayscue
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May 15, 2012

-32-

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit Number		Description of Exhibit

10.1		Stipulation to the Issuance of a Consent Order *

10.2		Consent Order issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the North Carolina Office of the Commissioner of Banks *

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

32		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 USC 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101		Interactive data files providing financial information from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AB&T Financial Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012, in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language)**

*	Incorporated by reference

-33-

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company