Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPFinancial_Report.xls
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPa12-2455_1ex32d1.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPa12-2455_1ex31d1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPa12-2455_1ex31d2.htm
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPa12-2455_1ex10d1.htm
EX-10.2 - EX-10.2 - VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPa12-2455_1ex10d2.htm

Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

Form 10-Q

 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2011

 

OR

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                 to                 

 

Commission file number 1-31614

 


 

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

77-0138960

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

 

741 Calle Plano

Camarillo, California 93012

(Address of principal executive offices)(zip code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (805) 388-3700

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer x

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Smaller reporting company o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No x

 

As of February 3, 2012, there were 25,187,569 shares of the registrant’s $0.01 par value common stock outstanding.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

(UNAUDITED) QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements

3

 

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011

3

 

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

4

 

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2011

5

 

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

6

 

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

7

Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

19

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

29

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

29

 

 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

30

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

30

Item 6.

Exhibits

30

 

2



Table of Contents

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1:  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

December 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2011

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

17,049

 

$

17,318

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

10,399

 

9,591

 

Inventory

 

18,133

 

20,857

 

Restricted cash

 

405

 

404

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

2,285

 

2,039

 

Total current assets

 

48,271

 

50,209

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

5,388

 

5,934

 

Other intangible assets, net

 

2,230

 

1,781

 

Other assets

 

2,954

 

3,070

 

 

 

$

58,843

 

$

60,994

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

7,321

 

$

5,198

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

13,590

 

14,463

 

Deferred revenue

 

3,362

 

3,878

 

Current portion of debt and capital leases

 

11

 

11

 

Total current liabilities

 

24,284

 

23,550

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

1,759

 

1,927

 

Long-term debt, net

 

15,538

 

15,444

 

Compound embedded derivative

 

4,498

 

7,796

 

Convertible subordinated debt, net of discount

 

41,178

 

40,736

 

Total liabilities

 

87,257

 

89,453

 

Commitments and contingencies, See note 10

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' deficit:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. 10,000,000 shares authorized; Series B Non Cumulative, Convertible, 134,720 shares outstanding at December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011

 

1

 

1

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value. 250,000,000 shares authorized; 24,621,616 and 24,470,280 shares outstanding at December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011, respectively

 

246

 

245

 

Additional paid-in-capital

 

1,825,321

 

1,824,433

 

Accumulated deficit

 

(1,853,982

)

(1,853,138

)

Total stockholders' deficit

 

(28,414

)

(28,459

)

 

 

$

58,843

 

$

60,994

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Net revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

Product revenues

 

$

28,942

 

$

37,596

 

Intellectual property revenues

 

1,049

 

151

 

Net revenues

 

29,991

 

37,747

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenues

 

12,163

 

14,349

 

Engineering, research and development

 

12,425

 

14,182

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

7,424

 

10,459

 

Restructuring and impairment charges

 

28

 

264

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

67

 

165

 

Costs and expenses

 

32,107

 

39,419

 

Loss from operations

 

(2,116

)

(1,672

)

Other (income) expense:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

1,948

 

2,518

 

(Gain) loss on compound embedded derivative

 

(3,298

)

3,484

 

Other expense (income), net

 

12

 

(16

)

Other (income) expense, net

 

(1,338

)

5,986

 

Loss before income tax expense

 

(778

)

(7,658

)

Income tax expense

 

66

 

74

 

Net loss

 

(844

)

(7,732

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.32

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted

 

24,512

 

24,050

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

 

 

Preferred Stock

 

Common Stock

 

Additional
Paid-in-

 

Accumulated

 

Total
Stockholders'

 

(in thousands, except share data)

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Deficit

 

Deficit

 

Balance at September 30, 2011

 

134,720

 

$

1

 

24,470,280

 

$

245

 

$

1,824,433

 

$

(1,853,138

)

$

(28,459

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

(844

)

(844

)

Compensation expense related to stock options, awards and ESPP

 

 

 

 

 

1,063

 

 

1,063

 

Release of restricted stock units

 

 

 

220,062

 

2

 

(2

)

 

 

Repurchase and retirement of restricted stock units for payroll taxes

 

 

 

(68,726

)

(1

)

(173

)

 

(174

)

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

134,720

 

$

1

 

24,621,616

 

$

246

 

$

1,825,321

 

$

(1,853,982

)

$

(28,414

)

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(844

)

$

(7,732

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

751

 

969

 

Stock-based compensation

 

1,063

 

684

 

Change in fair value of compound embedded derivative liability

 

(3,298

)

3,484

 

Loss on asset impairment

 

4

 

 

Gain on disposal of fixed assets

 

(9

)

 

Interest paid in kind

 

 

336

 

Amortization of debt issuance costs

 

68

 

254

 

Amortization of debt discounts

 

579

 

424

 

Accretion of debt premiums

 

(38

)

 

Change in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

(808

)

2,093

 

Inventory

 

2,724

 

234

 

Restricted cash

 

(1

)

(3,007

)

Prepaids and other assets

 

(200

)

950

 

Accounts payable

 

2,123

 

(4,751

)

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

(1,045

)

(1,806

)

Deferred revenue

 

(516

)

(241

)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

553

 

(8,109

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(645

)

(1,114

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(645

)

(1,114

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows used in financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchase and retirement of restricted stock units for payroll taxes

 

(174

)

 

Capital lease obligations

 

(3

)

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(177

)

(2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash

 

(269

)

(9,225

)

Cash at beginning of period

 

17,318

 

38,127

 

Cash at end of period

 

$

17,049

 

$

28,902

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of non cash transactions:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the year for:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

2,270

 

$

2,422

 

Income taxes

 

172

 

316

 

Non cash investing and financing activites:

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued in exchange for Series B Preferred Stock

 

 

3

 

Common stock issued for restricted stock units

 

1

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

December 31, 2011

 

NOTE 1—THE COMPANY AND ITS SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Description of Business

 

Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation (“Vitesse,” the “Company,” “us” or “we”) is a leading supplier of high-performance integrated circuits (“ICs”) that are utilized primarily by manufacturers of networking systems for Carrier and Enterprise networking applications. Vitesse designs, develops and markets a diverse portfolio of high-performance, low-power and cost-competitive semiconductor products for these applications.

 

Vitesse was incorporated in the state of Delaware in 1987. Our headquarters are located at 741 Calle Plano, Camarillo, California, and our phone number is (805) 388-3700. Our stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market under the ticker symbol VTSS.

 

Fiscal Year

 

Our fiscal year is October 1 through September 30.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Form 10-Q and Article 10 of SEC Regulation S-X. They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended September 30, 2011, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 6, 2011.

 

The consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited; however, they contain all normal recurring accruals and adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position at December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011, the consolidated results of our operations and consolidated cash flows for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the changes in our stockholders’ deficit for the three months ended December 31, 2011. The results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for future quarters or the full year.

 

Reclassifications

 

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts and related footnotes to conform to current-year presentation with no changes to stockholders’ deficit amounts or net loss for the three months ended December 31, 2011.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and disclosures made in the accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements. Management regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts, warranty reserves, inventory reserves, stock-based compensation, derivative valuation, purchased intangible asset valuations and useful lives, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. These estimates and assumptions are based on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results we experience may differ materially and adversely from our original estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.

 

7



Table of Contents

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Product revenues

 

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, we recognize product revenue when the following fundamental criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred; (iii) the price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collection of the sales price is reasonably assured. Delivery occurs when goods are shipped and title and risk of loss transfer to the customer, in accordance with the terms specified in the arrangement with the customer. Revenue recognition is deferred in all instances where the earnings process is incomplete. We recognize revenue on goods shipped directly to customers, based on when shipping terms result in title transfer, as that is when title passes to the customer and all revenue recognition criteria specified above are met.

 

A portion of our product sales is made through distributors under agreements allowing for pricing credits and/or right of return. Our past history with these pricing credits and/or right of return provisions prevent us from being able to reasonably estimate the final price of our inventory to be sold and the amount of inventory that could be returned pursuant to these agreements. As a result, the fixed and determinable revenue recognition criterion has not been met at the time we deliver products allowing for pricing credits or right of returns. Accordingly, product revenue from sales made through these distributors is not recognized until the distributors ship the product to their customers. We also maintain inventory, or hub, arrangements with certain of our customers. Pursuant to these arrangements, we deliver products to a customer or a designated third party warehouse based upon the customer’s projected needs, but do not recognize revenue unless and until the customer reports that it has removed our product from the warehouse and taken title and risk of loss.

 

From time to time, we may ship goods to our distributors with no pricing credits and/or no or limited right of return.  Under these circumstances, at the time of shipment, product prices are fixed or determinable and the amount of future returns and pricing allowances to be granted in the future can be reasonably estimated and are accrued. Accordingly, revenues are recorded net of these estimated amounts.

 

Intellectual property revenues

 

We derive intellectual property (“IP”) revenues from the license of our IP, maintenance and support, and royalty revenue following the sale by our licensees of products incorporating the licensed technology. We enter into IP licensing agreements that generally provide licensees the right to incorporate our IP components in their products with terms and conditions that vary by licensee. Our IP licensing agreements may include multiple elements with an IP license bundled with support services. For such multiple element IP licensing arrangements, we follow the guidance in FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition, to determine whether there is more than one unit of accounting.

 

We recognize revenue from the sale of patents when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, fees are fixed or determinable, delivery has occurred, and collectability is reasonably assured. All of the requirements are generally fulfilled upon execution of the patent sale arrangement.

 

License and contract revenues are recorded upon delivery of the technology when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, fees are fixed or determinable, delivery has occurred, and collectability is reasonably assured. Other than maintenance and support, there is no continuing obligation under these arrangements after delivery of the IP. Deferred revenue is created when we bill a customer in accordance with a contract prior to having met the requirements for revenue recognition.

 

Certain of our agreements may contain support obligations. Under such agreements we provide unspecified, when and if, bug fixes and technical support. No other upgrades, products, or post-contract support are provided. These arrangements may be renewable annually by the customer. Support revenue is recognized ratably over the period during which the obligation exists, typically 12 months or less.

 

We recognize royalty revenue in the period in which the licensee reports shipment of products incorporating our IP components. Royalties are calculated on a per unit basis, as specified in our agreement with the licensee. We may, at our discretion and in accordance with our agreements, engage a third-party to perform royalty audits of our licensees. Any correction of royalties previously reported would occur when the results are resolved.

 

Multiple Element Transactions

 

For multiple-element arrangements, we allocate revenue to all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. In such circumstances, we use a hierarchy to determine the selling price to be used for allocating revenues to deliverables: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (VSOE); (ii) third-party evidence of selling price (TPE), and (iii) best estimate of the selling price (ESP). VSOE generally exists only when we sell the deliverable separately and revenue is the price actually charged by us for that deliverable. Generally, we are not able to determine TPE because our licensing arrangements differ from that of our peers. We have concluded that no VSOE or TPE exists because it is rare that either we or our competitors sell the deliverables on a stand-alone basis. ESPs reflect our best estimate of what the selling prices of the elements would be if they were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. While changes in the allocation of the estimated sales price between the units of accounting will not affect the amount of total revenue recognized for a particular sales arrangement, any material changes in these allocations could impact the timing of revenue recognition, which could affect our results of operations.

 

8



Table of Contents

 

In determining ESPs, we apply significant judgment as we weigh a variety of factors, based on the facts and circumstances of the arrangement. The facts and circumstances we may consider include but are not limited to prices charged for similar offerings, if any, our historical pricing practices as well as the nature and complexity of different technologies being licensed, geographies and the number of uses allowed for a given license.

 

Fair Value

 

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires disclosures about fair value measurement. ASC 820 emphasizes that a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 established the following fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (2) the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs):

 

Level 1:  Observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;

 

Level 2:  Other inputs observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or market-corroborate inputs; and

 

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data and which requires the owner of the assets or liabilities to develop its own assumptions about how market participants would price these assets or liabilities. We only have one Level 3 recurring fair value measurement, the compound embedded derivative.

 

Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.

 

Financial Instruments

 

ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, defines the fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. Our financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses. These financial instruments are stated at their carrying values, which are estimates of their fair values because of their nearness to cash settlement or the comparability of their terms to the terms we could obtain, for similar instruments, in the current market. Our debt instruments are included in current portion of debt, long-term debt, net, and convertible subordinated debt, net of discount on our unaudited consolidated balance sheets and are presented as described below:

 

Senior Term A Loan

 

At its inception, the fair value of Term A Loan was computed using a cash flow analysis in which the periodic cash coupon payments and the principal payment at maturity were discounted to the valuation date using an appropriate market discount rate. The discount rate was determined by analyzing the seniority and securitization of the instrument, our financial condition, and observing the quoted bond yields in the fixed income market as of the valuation date.

 

Senior Term B Loan

 

At its inception, the fair value of Term B Loan was computed using a binomial lattice model. The valuation was determined using Level 3 inputs. The valuation model combined expected cash outflows with market-based assumptions regarding risk-adjusted yields, stock price volatility, recent price quotes and trading information of our common stock into which the Term B loan is convertible.

 

9



Table of Contents

 

Convertible Subordinated Debt

 

We estimate the fair values of the convertible subordinated debt and compound embedded derivative (“2014 Debentures”) using a convertible bond valuation model within a lattice framework determined using Level 3 inputs. The valuation model combines expected cash outflows with market-based assumptions regarding risk-adjusted yields, stock price volatility, recent price quotes and trading information of our common stock into which the 2014 Debentures are convertible. As the conversion price is not being indexed to our common stock, the compound embedded derivative is bifurcated and presented on the balance sheet at fair value and the compound embedded derivative is marked to market. The change in the fair value of the compound embedded derivative is a non-cash item primarily related to the change in price of the underlying common stock and is reflected in earnings. At our option, we can settle the compound embedded derivative in either cash or common stock. As we intend to, and have the ability to, satisfy the obligations with equity securities, in accordance with ASC Topic 470, Debt, we have classified the liability as a long-term liability on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011.

 

The valuation methodologies we use as described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, although we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

 

Intangible and Long-Lived Assets

 

Our intangible assets consist primarily of existing technologies, IP, and related costs for Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) system. We account for intangible assets in accordance with ASC Topic 350, Goodwill and Others. We evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. The carrying value of an asset or asset group is not recoverable if the amounts of undiscounted future cash flows the assets are expected to generate (including any net proceeds expected from the disposal of the asset) are less than its carrying value. When we identify that impairment has occurred, we reduce the carrying value of the asset to its comparable market value (if available and appropriate) or to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach. Currently, we do not have goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

We evaluate the collectability of accounts receivable at each balance sheet date using a combination of factors, such as historical experience, credit quality, age of the accounts receivable balances, and economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. We include any accounts receivable balances that are determined to be uncollectible in the overall allowance for doubtful accounts using the specific identification method. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance.  Our allowance for doubtful accounts is $2.2 million as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 (“ASU 2011-12”).  This ASU supersedes certain pending paragraphs in ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, to effectively defer only those changes in Update 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. This ASU will temporarily allow the Board time to re-deliberate the presentation requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for annual and interim financial statements. We do not anticipate the adoption of ASU 2011-12 will have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants or the SEC did not, or are not believed by management to, have a material impact on our present or future consolidated financial statements.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 2—COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

 

In accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share, basic net income and loss per share is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

 

For periods in which we report net income, the weighted average number of shares used to calculate diluted income per share is inclusive of common stock equivalents from unexercised stock options, restricted stock units, and shares to be issued under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), warrants, convertible preferred stock and convertible debentures. Unexercised stock options, restricted stock units, ESPP shares, and warrants are considered to be common stock equivalents if, using the treasury stock method, they are determined to be dilutive. The dilutive effect of the convertible preferred stock and convertible notes is determined using the if-converted method, which assumes any proceeds that could be obtained upon the exercise of stock options, warrants and ESPP shares would be used to purchase common shares at the average market price for the period.

 

The potential common shares excluded from the diluted computation are as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding stock options

 

1,885

 

1,951

 

Outstanding restricted stock units

 

2,162

 

1,730

 

Outstanding warrants

 

 

8

 

Convertible preferred stock

 

674

 

674

 

2014 Convertible debentures

 

10,332

 

10,332

 

Term B loan convertible note

 

1,887

 

 

ESPP Shares

 

297

 

 

Total potential common stock excluded from calculation

 

17,237

 

14,695

 

 

NOTE 3—DETAILS OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL STATEMENT COMPONENTS

 

The following table provides details of inventory as of December 31, 2011 and September 31, 2010:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2011

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Inventory:

 

 

 

 

 

Raw materials

 

$

2,009

 

$

883

 

Work-in-process

 

8,184

 

9,247

 

Finished goods

 

7,940

 

10,727

 

Total

 

$

18,133

 

$

20,857

 

 

11



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 4—DEBT

 

 

 

December 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2011

 

2011

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Term A Loan, 10.50% fixed-rate notes, due February 2014

 

$

 

8,208

 

$

 

8,247

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Term B Loan-convertible, 8.0% fixed-rate notes, due October 2014

 

7,313

 

7,177

 

Capital leases, non-current portion

 

17

 

20

 

Total long-term debt, net

 

15,538

 

15,444

 

2014 Convertible subordinated debentures, 8.0% fixed-rate notes, due October 2014

 

41,178

 

40,736

 

Total debt, net

 

$

 

56,716

 

$

 

56,180

 

 

The Term A Loan has a remaining principal balance of $7.9 million and is carried on the balance sheet at $8.2 million, including remaining unamortized premium, and matures on February 4, 2014. The Term A Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 10.5% per annum payable quarterly in arrears. Considering the debt premium, the effective interest rate on the Term A Loan is 8.2%.

 

The Term B Loan has a principal balance of $9.3 million, is carried on the balance sheet at $7.3 million, net of remaining unamortized discount, and matures on October 30, 2014 unless converted earlier. The Term B Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 8% per annum payable quarterly in arrears. Prepayments on the Term B Loan are permitted at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest, but only if the closing price of our common stock has been at least 130% of the conversion price in effect for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the day prior to the date of notice of prepayment. The Term B Loan is convertible into our common stock at a conversion price of $4.95 per share (equivalent to approximately 202 shares per $1,000 principal amount). The conversion terms are substantially similar to the conversion terms of the 2014 Debentures, except that there is no provision for the potential payment of a make-whole interest amount upon conversion. At December 31, 2011, conversion of the outstanding principal amount of the Term B Loan would result in the issuance of 1,887,234 shares of common stock. We can elect to settle any conversion in stock, cash or a combination of stock and cash. Considering the debt discount, the effective interest rate on the Term B Loan is 17.7%.

 

The Term A Loan and Term B Loan (collectively, the “Term A and B Loans”) are collateralized by substantially all of our assets.

 

The 2014 Debentures have a principal balance of $46.5 million and are carried on the balance sheet at $41.2 million net of the remaining unamortized discount, which is being amortized as interest expense over the remaining life of the debenture. The 2014 Debentures bear interest at 8% per annum payable semi-annually in arrears. On or after October 30, 2011, prepayment of the 2014 Debentures is permitted at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, but only if the closing price of our common stock has been at least 130% of the conversion price in effect for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the day prior to the date of notice of prepayment. The 2014 Debentures are convertible into our common stock at a conversion price of $4.50 per share (equivalent to approximately 222 shares per $1,000 principal amount). We can elect to settle any conversion in stock, cash or a combination of stock and cash. If a 2014 Debenture is converted into common stock on or prior to October 30, 2012, we must pay a “make-whole amount” equal to the 2014 Debenture’s scheduled remaining interest payments through October 30, 2012, which we may elect to pay in cash or in shares of common stock valued at 95% of the average daily volume weighted average price per share over a 10 trading day period. The 2014 Debentures are collateralized by a second priority interest in substantially all of our assets.

 

At December 31, 2011, conversion of the outstanding principal amount of the 2014 Debentures would result in the issuance of 10,331,778 shares of common stock and $3.1 million in make-whole amount that may be paid in cash or by delivery of 0.7 million shares of common stock. Considering the debt discount, the effective interest rate on the Debentures is 12.24%.

 

12



Table of Contents

 

The credit agreements for the Term A and B Loans and 2014 Debenture agreements provide for customary restrictions and limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness and liens on property, make restricted payments or investments, enter into mergers or consolidations, conduct asset sales, pay dividends or distributions and enter into specified transactions and activities and also contain other customary default provisions. The agreements provide that we must repurchase, at the option of the holders, principal amounts plus accrued and unpaid interest upon the occurrence of a fundamental change involving us, as described in the agreements. Upon the occurrence of fundamental change involving us, the holders of the 2014 Debentures and the Term B Loan may be entitled to receive a “make-whole premium” if they convert their 2014 Debentures or Term B Loan into common stock, payable in additional shares of common stock, if the trading price of our common stock is between $3.20 and $16 per share. Upon the occurrence of certain change in control events, the holders of the Terms Loans may require us to redeem all or a portion of the loans at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest.

 

Except for required repurchases upon a change in control or in the event of certain asset sales, as described in the applicable credit agreements, we are not required to make any sinking fund or redemption payments with respect to this debt.

 

Maturities of outstanding debt by fiscal year ending September 30 are $7.9 million and $55.8 million for 2014 and 2015, respectively.

 

NOTE 5—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on our balance sheet on a recurring basis include the following at December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011:

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

September 30, 2011

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Compound embedded derivative liability

 

 

 

4,498

 

4,498

 

 

 

7,796

 

7,796

 

 

 

$

 

$

 

$

4,498

 

$

4,498

 

$

 

$

 

$

7,796

 

$

7,796

 

 

There were no transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during three months ended December 31, 2011.

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the compound embedded derivative measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

 

Compound Embedded Derivative Liability

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Beginning balance at September 30,

 

$

7,796

 

$

15,476

 

Transfers in and /or out of Level 3

 

 

 

Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements

 

 

 

Total net (gains) losses included in earnings

 

(3,298

)

3,484

 

Ending balance at December 31,

 

$

4,498

 

$

18,960

 

 

The compound embedded derivative liability, which is included in long term liabilities, represents the value of the equity conversion feature and a “make-whole” feature of the 2014 Debentures.

 

As of December 31, 2011, the fair value of the Term A and B Loans is $8.4 million and $8.1 million, respectively.

 

As of December 31, 2011, the fair value of the 2014 Debentures is $45.5 million excluding the fair value of the compound embedded derivative of $4.5 million.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 6—STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

 

Under all stock option plans, a total of 4.5 million shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance and 0.4 million shares are available for future grant as of December 31, 2011. The 2010 Incentive Plan permits the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, performance awards, restricted stock and stock units and other stock and cash-based awards.

 

As of December 31, 2011, none of our stock-based awards are classified as liabilities. We did not capitalize any stock-based compensation cost. Compensation costs related to our stock-based compensation plans are as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cost of revenues

 

$

122

 

$

94

 

Engineering, research and development

 

376

 

220

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

565

 

370

 

Total stock-based compensation expense

 

$

1,063

 

$

684

 

 

As of December 31, 2011, there was $8.4 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options, restricted stock units, and our ESPP. The weighted average period over which the unearned stock-based compensation is expected to be recognized is approximately 2.7 years. An estimated forfeiture rate of 5.23% has been applied to all unvested options and restricted stock outstanding as of December 31, 2011. Future stock-based compensation expense and unearned stock-based compensation will increase to the extent that we grant additional equity awards.

 

Stock Option Plans

 

Activity under all stock option plans for the three months ended December 31, 2011 was as follows:

 

 

 

Shares

 

Weighted average
exercise price

 

Weighted average
remaining
contractual life (in
years)

 

Aggregate
intrinsic value

 

Options outstanding, September 30, 2011

 

1,699,183

 

$

29.77

 

6.37

 

$

 

Granted

 

376,182

 

2.54

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

 

 

Cancelled or expired

 

(190,212

)

104.38

 

 

 

Options outstanding, December 31, 2011

 

1,885,153

 

16.81

 

7.33

 

 

Options exercisable, December 31, 2011

 

818,404

 

$

33.59

 

5.05

 

$

 

 

The aggregate intrinsic values in the preceding table for the options outstanding represent the total pretax intrinsic value, based on our closing stock price of $2.49, as of December 31, 2011, which would have been received by the option holders had those option holders exercised their in-the-money options as of those dates. There are no in-the-money stock options that were exercisable as of December 31, 2011.

 

The per share fair values of stock options granted in connection with stock incentive plans have been estimated using the following weighted average assumptions:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Expected life (in years)

 

5.62

 

6.25

 

Expected volatility:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average

 

87.0%

 

85.7%

 

Range

 

86.1% - 87.1%

 

85.7% - 86.3%

 

Expected dividend

 

 

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

1.08%-1.27%

 

2.29% - 2.35%

 

 

14



Table of Contents

 

Our determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards is affected by assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to: our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. The fair value of employee stock options is determined in accordance with ASC 718 and SAB 107, as amended by SAB No. 110, which provides supplemental application guidance based on the views of the SEC, using an option-pricing model, however, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction, or actually realized by the employee upon exercise.

 

A summary of restricted stock unit activity for the three months ended December 31, 2011 is as follows:

 

 

 

Restricted
Stock Units

 

Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value per Share

 

Restricted stock units vested and expected to vest, September 30, 2011

 

1,295,979

 

$

4.67

 

Awarded

 

1,124,068

 

2.54

 

Released

 

(220,062

)

4.64

 

Forfeited

 

(37,954

)

4.54

 

Restricted stock units vested and expected to vest, December 31, 2011

 

2,162,031

 

$

3.60

 

 

From time-to-time, we retain shares of common stock from employees upon vesting of restricted shares and restricted stock units to cover income tax withholding. The impact of such withholding totaled $0.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2011, and was recorded as settlement on restricted stock tax withholding in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of stockholders’ deficit.

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

In January 2011, our stockholders approved the 2011 ESPP under which 2.5 million shares of common stock are reserved for issuance. The first purchase period began on August 1, 2011 and ended January 31, 2012. The fair value of the ESPP awards are calculated in accordance with ASC 718-50 Employee Share Purchase Plans, under which the fair value of each share granted under the ESPP is equal to the sum of 15% of a share of stock, a call option for 85% of a share of stock, and a put option for 15% of a share of stock. The fair value of the call and put options are determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model. We used the following assumptions: expected useful life of 0.5 years, weighted average expected volatility of 40.4%, our expected dividend rate, and a risk-free interest rate of 0.2%. We recognized approximately $0.1 million in stock compensation for the three months ended December 31, 2011 related to the ESPP. At December 31, 2011, no shares had been issued under this plan and 2.5 million shares were available for future issuance. On January 31, 2012, 334,646 shares were issued at $2.59, a 15% discount against the share price on that date.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 7—INCOME TAXES

 

The provision for income taxes as a percentage of income from operations before income taxes was (8.48%) for the three months ended December 31, 2011 compared to (0.97%) for the comparable period in the prior year. Our effective tax rate is primarily impacted by operating losses.

 

Because we have historically experienced net tax losses, we have placed a valuation allowance against our otherwise recognizable deferred tax assets.

 

The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $10.2 million as of December 31, 2011, which did not change from September 30, 2011.

 

As of December 31, 2011, approximately $0.3 million of the $10.2 million ASC 740-10 (FIN 48) unrecognized tax benefits related to our state tax liability is recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the unaudited consolidated balance sheet. Of the remaining balance, $9.9 million relates to federal and state research and development tax credits that have not been utilized and are fully reserved.

 

Our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets to offset future taxable income may be significantly limited if we experience an “ownership change,” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).  In general, an ownership change will occur if there is a cumulative change in Vitesse’s ownership by “5% shareholders” (as defined in the Code) that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period.  Should an “ownership change” occur, it could significantly diminish the value of our net operating loss carryforwards by limiting the rate at which they could be permitted to offset them against any future taxable income.

 

The debt modifications in October 30, 2009 resulted in an “ownership change” as defined for United States federal income tax purposes. Therefore, our ability to utilize $56.3 million net operating losses incurred prior to the change of ownership became subject to an annual limitation of $3.1 million.

 

Net operating losses incurred by Vitesse subsequent to the ownership change totaled $26.6 million and are not subject to this limitation, however, they may be subject to limitation should a subsequent change in ownership occur. We are in the process of assessing the likelihood of an ownership change occurring for Section 382 purposes.

 

NOTE 8—RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT CHARGES

 

The combined summary of the recent activity related to our restructuring plans are as follows:

 

 

 

Facility
Consolidation and
Operating Lease
Commitments

 

Severance
Costs

 

Property and
Equipment
Impairment
Charges

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Liability balance at September 30, 2010

 

$

921

 

$

 

$

 

$

921

 

Charged to operations

 

1,389

 

1,126

 

1,141

 

3,656

 

Non-cash charges

 

 

 

(1,141

)

(1,141

)

Cash payments

 

 

(828

)

 

(828

)

Liability balance at September 30, 2011

 

$

2,310

 

$

298

 

$

 

$

2,608

 

Charged to operations

 

4

 

24

 

 

28

 

Non-cash charges

 

(4

)

 

 

(4

)

Cash payments

 

(253

)

(305

)

 

(558

)

Liability balance at December 31, 2011

 

$

2,057

 

$

17

 

$

 

$

2,074

 

 

In September 2011, we initiated a restructuring plan to further align our resources with our strategic business objectives. Employees impacted under this plan were notified prior to the end of fiscal year 2011. In September 2011, we consolidated our Camarillo operations into a single facility and exited an adjacent leased facility. As a result of the lease exit, we incurred $1.4 million in lease exit costs and $1.1 million in asset impairment charges for asset write-down for tenant improvements at the facility which will not be recovered from future related cash flows. The related facility was vacated before September 30, 2011.

 

16



Table of Contents

 

The fair value of the lease termination liability was determined based upon the present value of the remaining lease payments reduced by the current market rate for sublease rentals of similar properties. Our ability to generate sublease income is highly dependent upon the commercial real estate conditions at the time we perform our evaluations or negotiate sublease arrangements with third parties. The amounts we have accrued represent our best estimate of the obligations we expect to incur and could be subject to adjustments as market conditions change. Changes to the estimates will be reflected as “adjustments” in the period the changes in estimates were determined. There were no changes to the estimates for the three months ended December 31, 2011. Our cash payments under the lease agreement may differ significantly from the exit accrual recorded due to the differences between actual experience and estimates made by management in establishing the lease termination accrual.

 

NOTE 9—SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

 

We manage and operate our business through one operating segment.

 

Based on direct shipments, net revenues to customers that were equal to or greater than 10% of total net revenues in the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Nu Horizons Electronics (distributor)

 

21.9

%

19.8

%

WPI Int’l. (HK) Ltd. (distributor)

 

10.2

%

 

*

Tellabs

 

 

*

12.2

%

 


*Less that 10% of total net revenues for period indicated.

 

Net revenues are summarized by geographic area as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

United States

 

$

13,725

 

18,634

 

Asia Pacific

 

10,535

 

13,405

 

EMEA*

 

4,605

 

4,929

 

Other

 

1,126

 

779

 

Total net revenues

 

$

29,991

 

$

37,747

 

 


*                                         Europe, Middle East and Africa

 

Revenue by geographic area is based upon where the design win for the work originated. United States revenue includes $1.0 million and $0.2 million of intellectual property revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We believe a substantial portion of the products sold to OEMs and third-party manufacturing service providers in the Asia Pacific region are ultimately shipped to end-markets in the United States and Europe.

 

We also classify our product revenues based on our three product lines: (i) Connectivity; (ii) Ethernet switching; and (iii) Transport processing.

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Connectivity

 

$

12,968

 

$

17,867

 

Ethernet switching

 

8,023

 

10,207

 

Transport processing

 

7,951

 

9,522

 

Product revenues

 

$

28,942

 

$

37,596

 

 

17



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 10—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

We are involved in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including actions against us which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines and penalties in substantial amounts.

 

During our normal course of business, we make certain contractual guarantees and indemnities pursuant to which we may be required to make future payments under specific circumstances. We review our exposure under these agreements no less than annually, or more frequently when events indicate. Except for our established warranty reserves, we do not expect that any potential payments in connection with any of these indemnity obligations would have a material adverse effect on out consolidated financial position. Accordingly, except for established warranty reserves, we have not recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011.

 

Patents and Licenses

 

We have entered into various licensing agreements requiring primarily fixed fee royalty payments. Certain of these agreements contain provisions for the payment of guaranteed or minimum royalty amounts. In the event that we fail to pay any minimum annual royalties, these licenses may automatically be terminated.

 

Warranties

 

We establish reserves for future product warranty costs that are expected to be incurred pursuant to specific warranty provisions with our customers. Our warranty reserves are established at the time of sale and updated throughout the warranty period based upon numerous factors including historical warranty return rates and expenses over various warranty periods.

 

Intellectual Property Indemnities

 

We indemnify certain customers and our contract manufacturers against liability arising from third-party claims of intellectual property rights infringement related to our products. These indemnities appear in development and supply agreements with our customers as well as manufacturing service agreements with our contract manufacturers, are not limited in amount or duration and generally survive the expiration of the contract. Given that the amount of any potential liabilities related to such indemnities cannot be determined until an infringement claim has been made, we are unable to determine the maximum amount of losses that we could incur related to such indemnifications.

 

Director and Officer Indemnities and Contractual Guarantees

 

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers, which require us to indemnify such individuals to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Our indemnification obligations under such agreements are not limited in amount or duration. Certain costs incurred in connection with such indemnifications may be recovered under certain circumstances under various insurance policies. Given that the amount of any potential liabilities related to such indemnities cannot be determined until a lawsuit has been filed against a director or executive officer, we are unable to determine the maximum amount of losses that we could incur relating to such indemnities

 

We have also entered into severance and change in control agreements with certain of our executives. These agreements provide for the payment of specific compensation benefits to such executives upon the termination of their employment with us.

 

General Contractual Indemnities/Products Liability

 

During the normal course of business, we enter into contracts with customers where we agreed to indemnify the other party for personal injury or property damage caused by our products. Our indemnification obligations under such agreements are not generally limited in amount or duration. Given that the amount of any potential liabilities related to such indemnities cannot be determined until a lawsuit has been filed against a director or executive officer, we are unable to determine the maximum amount of losses that we could incur relating to such indemnities. Historically, any amounts payable pursuant to such indemnities have not had a material negative effect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We maintain general and product liability insurance as well as errors and omissions insurance, which may provide a source of recovery to us in the event of an indemnification claim.

 

18



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Cautionary Statement

 

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto contained in Part I, Item 1 of this Report. The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this Report, as well as in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011 (“Annual Report”) and in our other filings with the SEC, which discuss our business in greater detail.

 

This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statements that do not directly relate to historical or current fact. We use words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “expects,” “future,” “intends,” “may,” “should,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “becoming,” “transitioning,” and similar expressions to identify such forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements include statements as to our business outlook, revenues, margins, expenses, tax provision, capital resources sufficiency, capital expenditures, interest income, cash commitments, and expenses. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those referenced in the subsection entitled “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Report and Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report, and similar discussions in our other SEC filings. We assume no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.

 

Overview

 

We are a leading supplier of high-performance ICs, principally targeted at systems manufacturers in the communications industry. Within the communications industry, our products address Carrier and Enterprise networking, where they enable data to be transmitted at high-speeds and processed and switched under a variety of protocols.

 

Over the last 10 years, the worldwide proliferation of the Internet and the rapid growth in the volume of data being sent over LANs and WANs has placed a tremendous strain on the existing communications infrastructure. Communication service providers have sought to increase their revenues by delivering a growing range of data services to their customers in a cost-effective manner. The resulting demand for increased bandwidth and services has created a need for faster, larger and more complex networks.

 

In recent years, we focused our product development and marketing efforts on products that leverage the convergence of Carrier and Enterprise networking to Internet Protocol-based networks. These next-generation networks share the requirements of high reliability, scalability, interoperability, and low cost. Increasingly, these networks will be delivered based on Ethernet technology. We believe that products in this emerging technology area represent the best opportunity for us to provide differentiation in the market.

 

Realization of Our Strategy

 

Several years ago, we embarked on a process to substantially re-invent Vitesse to take advantage of the dramatic ongoing transformation of our target networking markets. Towards that goal, we re-positioned our R&D teams and invested heavily to enter new markets, develop new products, and penetrate new customers in an effort to diversify ourselves and provide new opportunities for growth.

 

As with any high-technology company, these growth opportunities begin with new products. We improved the efficiency of our R&D by focusing our resources on two large, but independent markets: Carrier networking and Enterprise networking, which both rely increasingly on Ethernet technology, allowing us to maximize the impact of our R&D budget.

 

After two years of development, Vitesse introduced over 30 new products in 2010, over 20 new products in 2011, and we continue to introduce new products in 2012. These introductions included many new “platform” products and technology that will serve as the basis for future product development. This rate was nearly double our historic rate of product introductions and allowed us to substantially increase our served markets in both Carrier and Enterprise networking, providing us better growth opportunities.

 

The next step to generating growth is creating market traction and design wins where we are selected by our customers over our competitors. As we took our new products to market in 2011 and 2012, we saw a dramatic increase in our customer engagements and the number of design opportunities that were being identified by our sales team. Early adoption of our products by our customers has exceeded our goals. In 2011, we recorded over 300 new design wins, a 250% increase from the prior year. Of these design wins, we expect 80% of the value to come from our Tier-1 and Tier-2 customers, and nearly 50% to come from our new products introduced in 2010 and 2011. Design wins remain strong as we enter 2012.

 

19



Table of Contents

 

Together with our customers, we are now preparing to take these new products into production. In our industry it typically takes 12 to 18 months for our customers to go from first product sample received to first customer shipment as customers do the necessary development work to complete and qualify their systems in the network. In 2011 and the first quarter of 2012, we shipped samples and pre-production on the majority of these new products, and we expect our customers to phase into volume production over the course of 2012 and into 2013.

 

As these new products ramp, we will begin a migration of our revenues to our new products, providing a new growth cycle for Vitesse. In 2011, only 5% of our revenue was from products sampled in the last three years. Based on observable market traction and the design wins captured in 2011, we expect revenues from our new products to increase in 2012 and continue to grow strongly from there.

 

We have also made solid progress on our strategy to strengthen our operational performance and execution. Our efforts in operations include reduction in materials costs and cycle times, improved product yields, implementation of programs such as lean manufacturing, and an increased emphasis on the importance of our customers. During the last three years, we accelerated our comprehensive efforts to increase our product gross margins and operating margins, which together have substantially increased our operating leverage. During the last three years we have:

 

·                  Expanded our business in Europe and Asia, as a result of improved penetration into Tier 1 networking OEMs.

 

·                  Transitioned to a fully outsourced manufacturing model by moving the majority of our California probe and test function to an outsourced, offshore Asian test contractor, which was completed in 2010. This production model substantially reduced our fixed costs, headcount, and cost of testing, and will allow us to reduce our manufacturing cycle times and better serve our growing customer base in Asia.

 

·                  Consolidated multiple locations in order to gain efficiencies and streamline costs.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our discussion and analysis of our historical financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with those principals require us to make certain estimates of certain items and judgments as to certain future events including for example those related to revenue recognition, inventory valuation, long-lived assets, valuation of compound embedded derivative and term loan, stock-based compensation, income taxes, and restructuring assets. These determinations, even though inherently subjective and subject to change, affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. While we believe that our estimates are based on reasonable assumptions and judgments at the time they are made, some of our assumptions, estimates and judgments will inevitably prove to be incorrect. As a result, actual outcomes will likely differ from our accruals, and those differences, positive or negative, could be material. Some of our accruals are subject to adjustment, as we believe appropriate, based on revised estimates and reconciliation to the actual results when available.

 

Our critical accounting policies and estimates are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011. There have been no significant changes to these policies during the three months ended December 31, 2011. These policies and estimates continue to be those that we believe are most important to a reader’s ability to understand our financial results.

 

Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

For information with respect to recent accounting pronouncements and the impact of these pronouncements, see “The Company and Its Significant Accounting Policies” footnote in the accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

20



Table of Contents

 

Results of Operations for the three months ended December 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended December 31, 2010

 

The following table sets forth certain Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations data for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

$

 

%

 

$

 

%

 

 

 

(in thousands, except for percentages)

 

Net revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product revenues

 

$

28,942

 

96.5

%

$

37,596

 

99.6

%

Intellectual property revenues

 

1,049

 

3.5

%

151

 

0.4

%

Net revenues

 

29,991

 

100.0

%

37,747

 

100.0

%

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenues

 

12,163

 

40.6

%

14,349

 

38.0

%

Engineering, research and development

 

12,425

 

41.4

%

14,182

 

37.6

%

Selling, general and administrative

 

7,424

 

24.8

%

10,459

 

27.7

%

Restructuring and impairment charges

 

28

 

0.1

%

264

 

0.7

%

Amortization of intangible assets

 

67

 

0.2

%

165

 

0.4

%

Costs and expenses

 

32,107

 

107.0

%

39,419

 

104.4

%

Loss from operations

 

(2,116

)

(7.0

)%

(1,672

)

(4.4

)%

Other (income) expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

1,948

 

6.5

%

2,518

 

6.7

%

(Gain) loss on compound embedded derivative

 

(3,298

)

(11.0

)%

3,484

 

9.2

%

Other expense (income), net

 

12

 

0.0

%

(16

)

(0.0

)%

Other (income) expense, net

 

(1,338

)

(4.5

)%

5,986

 

15.9

%

Loss before income tax expense

 

(778

)

(2.6

)%

(7,658

)

(20.3

)%

Income tax expense

 

66

 

0.2

%

74

 

0.2

%

Net loss

 

$

(844

)

(2.8

)%

$

(7,732

)

(20.5

)%

 

21



Table of Contents

 

Product Revenues

 

We sell our products into the following markets: (i) Carrier networking; (ii) Enterprise networking; and (iii) Non-core. The Carrier networking market includes core, metro, access, mobile, and backhaul networks. The Enterprise networking market covers Ethernet switching and transmission within LANs in small-medium enterprise (“SME”) and small-medium business (“SMB”) markets. The Non-core market is comprised of legacy products that have not received additional investment over the last five years and, as a result, have generally been in decline.

 

The following table summarizes our product revenues by market:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

% of Product
Revenues

 

Amount

 

% of Product
Revenues

 

Change

 

%
Change

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

Carrier networking

 

$

11,992

 

41.4

%

$

18,165

 

48.3

%

$

(6,173

)

(34.0

)%

Enterprise networking

 

14,427

 

49.8

%

17,346

 

46.1

%

(2,919

)

(16.8

)%

Non-core

 

2,523

 

8.8

%

2,085

 

5.6

%

438

 

21.0

%

Product revenues

 

$

28,942

 

100.0

%

$

37,596

 

100.0

%

$

(8,654

)

(23.0

)%

 

The decrease in Carrier networking revenues is primarily attributable to general market decline in mature SONET-based products and resulting inventory corrections by customers. This impact has been primarily in Asia, particularly China and a single North American customer. The decline in Enterprise networking revenues is driven primarily by a strong decline in several optical module manufacturers due in part to flooding in manufacturing facilities in Thailand and resulting disruption in their supply chains as well as a small decline in our switch and PHY products selling into low-end SME/SMB applications. The increase in Non-core revenues is largely attributable to increased purchases of legacy products in our Network Processing (“NPU”) product line as customers increase inventory after we announced our plans to phase-out production of these products (“end-of-life”.)

 

We also classify our product revenues based on our three product lines: (i) Connectivity; (ii) Ethernet switching; and (iii) Transport processing.

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

% of Product
Revenues

 

Amount

 

% of Product
Revenues

 

Change

 

%
Change

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

Connectivity

 

$

12,968

 

44.8

%

$

17,867

 

47.5

%

$

(4,899

)

(27.4

)%

Ethernet switching

 

8,023

 

27.7

%

10,207

 

27.1

%

(2,184

)

(21.4

)%

Transport processing

 

7,951

 

27.5

%

9,522

 

25.4

%

(1,571

)

(16.5

)%

Product revenues

 

$

28,942

 

100.0

%

$

37,596

 

100.0

%

$

(8,654

)

(23.0

)%

 

The decrease in Connectivity revenues is largely attributable to decreases in products for 10G SONET PHYs and 10G Laser Drivers for long haul DWDM applications, primarily in Asia.

 

The decrease in Ethernet switching revenues is largely attributable to declines in our Ethernet Media Access Control (“MAC”) products selling primarily into Carrier markets, due to overall softness in these markets compared with the same period in 2011.

 

22



Table of Contents

 

The decrease in Transport processing revenues is largely attributable to a decline in our legacy SONET framers in North America and Asia, partially offset by increases in our NPU and Switch Fabrics products as customers increase inventories on these products as they approach end-of-life.

 

Based on direct shipments, net revenues to customers that were equal to or greater than 10% of total net revenues in the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Nu Horizons Electronics (distributor)

 

21.9

%

19.8

%

WPI Int'l. (HK) Ltd. (distributor)

 

10.2

%

 

*

Tellabs

 

 

*

12.2

%

 


*Less that 10% of total net revenues for period indicated.

 

Net revenues are summarized by geographic area as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

% of Total Net
Revenues

 

Amount

 

% of Total Net
Revenues

 

Change

 

%
Change

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

13,725

 

45.8

%

$

18,634

 

49.4

%

$

(4,909

)

(26.3

)%

Asia Pacific

 

10,535

 

35.1

%

13,405

 

35.5

%

(2,870

)

(21.4

)%

EMEA*

 

4,605

 

15.4

%

4,929

 

13.1

%

(324

)

(6.6

)%

Other

 

1,126

 

3.7

%

779

 

2.0

%

347

 

44.5

%

Total net revenues

 

$

29,991

 

100.0

%

$

37,747

 

100.0

%

$

(7,756

)

(20.5

)%

 


(*) EMEA includes Europe, Middle East and Africa

 

Revenue by geographic area is based upon where the design win for the work originated. United States revenue includes $1.0 million and $0.2 million of intellectual property revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We believe a substantial portion of the products sold to OEMs and third-party manufacturing service providers in the Asia Pacific region are ultimately shipped to end-markets in the United States and Europe.

 

Various factors may impact our revenues including the timing of orders by significant customers, our ability to meet customer demand, as well as multiple other market factors.  Therefore, our revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 may not necessarily be indicative of future revenues.

 

Intellectual Property (IP) Revenues

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

% of Net
 Revenues

 

Amount

 

% of Net
 Revenues

 

Change

 

%
Change

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

IP revenues

 

$

1,049

 

3.5

%

$

151

 

0.4

%

$

898

 

594.7

%

 

The increase in IP revenue is attributable to $0.9 million from the licensing of IP during the three months ended December 31, 2011. Royalties received or recognized for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were not material.  Costs associated with the sale of IP are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

 

23



Table of Contents

 

Cost of Revenues

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

% of Net
Product
Revenues

 

Amount

 

% of Net
Product
Revenues

 

Change

 

%
Change

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenues

 

$

12,163

 

42.0

%

$

14,349

 

38.2

%

$

(2,186

)

(15.2

)%

 

We use third-parties for wafer fabrication and assembly services. Cost of revenues consists predominantly of: (i) purchased finished wafers; (ii) assembly services; (iii) test services; and (iv) labor and overhead costs associated with product procurement, planning and quality assurance.

 

The overall decrease in cost of revenues is largely attributable to lower product revenues. The increase in the cost of net revenues as a percent of product revenues is caused by higher production costs per unit due to fixed costs of manufacturing operations applied to reduced volume.

 

We expect to continue to adjust our inventory levels and anticipate that the sales of these higher cost inventories will temporarily increase our cost of net product revenues in future periods until our revenues return to prior levels.

 

As it is customary in the semiconductor industry for product prices of maturing products to decline over time, it is imperative that we continue to reduce our cost of revenues. We continue to focus our efforts on improving operating efficiencies, including improving product yields, reducing scrap and improving cycle times.

 

Engineering, Research and Development

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

% of Net
Revenues

 

Amount

 

% of Net
Revenues

 

Change

 

%
Change

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

Engineering, research and development

 

$

12,425

 

41.4

%

$

14,182

 

37.6

%

$

(1,757

)

(12.4

)%

 

Engineering, research and development (“R&D”) expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs, including stock-based compensation expense for employees engaged in research, design and development activities. R&D also includes costs of mask sets and electronic design automation tools, software licensing contracts, subcontracting and fabrication costs, depreciation and amortization, and facilities expenses.

 

The level of R&D expense as a percentage of net revenues will vary from period to period, depending, in part, on the level of net revenues. Our research and development efforts are critical to maintaining a high level of new product introductions and are critical to our plans for future growth.

 

The decrease in R&D expense in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year is largely attributable to lower compensation expense of $1.7 million and lower facility expense of $0.1 million resulting from our consolidation of multiple locations, and lower external physical design and test services of $0.3 million. These reductions were partially offset by increased expense of $0.5 million for mask sets and wafers.

 

We continue to concentrate our spending in R&D to meet customer requirements and to respond to market conditions, and we do not anticipate that the reduction in R&D will impact product development in fiscal year 2012.

 

24



Table of Contents

 

Selling, General and Administrative

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

% of Net
 Revenues

 

Amount

 

% of Net
 Revenues

 

Change

 

%
Change

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

$

7,424

 

24.8

%

$

10,459

 

27.7

%

$

(3,035

)

(29.0

)%

 

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense consists primarily of personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation expense, as well as legal and other professional fees, facilities expenses, outside labor and communication expenses.

 

The decrease in SG&A expense in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year is largely attributable to lower personnel related expenses of $1.5 million resulting from steps taken to reduce headcount during fiscal year 2011, $1.1 million in lower legal and accounting fees, and lower facility expenses of $0.3 million due to the closure of the Calle Carga facility.

 

Restructuring and Impairment Charges

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

% of Net
 Revenues

 

Amount

 

% of Net
Revenues

 

Change

 

%
Change

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring and impairment charges

 

$

28

 

0.1

%

$

264

 

0.7

%

$

(236

)

(89.4

)%

 

The restructuring costs in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 reflect costs related to the reduction in force at our Portland location, which was completed in October 2011.

 

In October 2010, we commenced a reduction in workforce at our Westford location. The related severance costs were $0.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010. The Westford reduction in workforce was completed by June 2011.

 

Amortization of Intangible Assets

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

% of Net
 Revenues

 

Amount

 

% of Net
Revenues

 

Change

 

%
Change

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

$

67

 

0.2

%

$

165

 

0.4

%

$

(98

)

(59.4

)%

 

The decrease in amortization expense for the three months ended December 31, 2011 compared to the same period last year is due to the amortization of existing intangible assets, some of which became fully amortized during fiscal year 2011.

 

25



Table of Contents

 

Interest Expense, net

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

% of Net
 Revenues

 

Amount

 

% of Net
 Revenues

 

Change

 

%
Change

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

$

1,948

 

6.5

%

$

2,518

 

6.7

%

$

(570

)

(22.6

)%

 

Net interest expense is comprised of interest expense, net of interest income, and amortization of debt discount and premium, and amortization of debt issuance costs.

 

The decrease in net interest expense for the three months ended December 31, 2011 compared to the same period last year was primarily due to the pay-down of $8.0 million on the Senior Term Loan in January 2011, the restructuring of the Senior Term Loan on February 4, 2011, and the $1.5 million principal payment on the Term A Loan in July 2011.

 

(Gain) loss on Compound Embedded Derivative

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

% of Net
 Revenues

 

Amount

 

% of Net
 Revenues

 

Change

 

%
Change

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

(Gain) loss on compound embedded derivative

 

$

(3,298

)

(11.0

)%

$

3,484

 

9.2

%

$

(6,782

)

(194.7

)%

 

The gain on our compound embedded derivative related to our 2014 Debentures for the three months ended December 31, 2011 is primarily generated by the decrease in the price of our underlying common stock during this period.

 

Income Tax Expense

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

% of Net
 Revenues

 

Amount

 

% of Net
 Revenues

 

Change

 

%
Change

 

 

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense

 

$

66

 

0.2

%

$

74

 

0.2

%

$

(8

)

(10.8

)%

 

Our effective tax rate for the three months ended December 31, 2011 was (8.48%). The income tax provision in the current year is primarily due to state minimum taxes and foreign taxes. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended December 31, 2010 was (0.97%), which was lower than the federal and state statutory rate due to the projected federal and state losses for the fiscal year.

 

26



Table of Contents

 

Financial Condition and Liquidity

 

Cash Flow Analysis

 

Cash decreased to $17.0 million at December 31, 2011, from $17.3 million at September 30, 2011. During the three months ended December 31, 2011 we generated cash from operations, which was offset by cash used for capital expenditures and financing activities. Our cash flows from operating, investing and financing are summarized as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

$

553

 

$

(8,109

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(645

)

(1,114

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(177

)

(2

)

Net decrease in cash

 

(269

)

(9,225

)

Cash at beginning of period

 

17,318

 

38,127

 

Cash at end of period

 

$

17,049

 

$

28,902

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Operating Activities

 

During the three months ended December 31, 2011, cash provided by operating activities totaled $0.6 million.  Excluding changes in working capital, cash used to fund our losses totaled $1.7 million. We also used $0.8 million cash to fund the increase in accounts receivable and $0.5 million cash related to the decrease in deferred revenue due to lower purchases from distributors. These uses were offset by the generation of $2.7 million cash from operating with lower inventory levels and $1.3 million cash from increased accounts payable and accrued expenses.

 

Accounts receivable increased $0.8 million from $9.6 million at September 30, 2011 to $10.4 million at December 31, 2011 and resulted from higher sales near the end of the quarter. Inventory decreased $2.7 million from $20.9 million at September 30, 2011 to $18.1 million at December 31, 2011. The lower inventory is due to a concerted effort to reduce purchases and production. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased by $1.3 million from $19.7 million at September 30, 2011 to $20.9 million at December 31, 2011 due to the timing of payments to our vendors and other service providers.

 

During the three months ended December 31, 2010, cash used in operating activities totaled $8.1 million. Excluding changes in working capital, cash used to fund our losses totaled $1.6 million. We transferred $3.0 million into a restricted cash trust account in anticipation of payment of the proposed SEC settlement. We also used $6.6 million to pay down our accounts payable and accrued liabilities and $0.2 million related to a decrease in deferred revenue due to lower purchases from distributors. These uses were partially offset by the generation of cash from the collection of accounts receivable of $2.1 million and operating with lower inventory levels of $0.2 million.

 

Accounts receivable decreased $2.1 million from $15.8 million at September 30, 2010 to $13.6 million at December 31, 2010. The increased cash generated from the collection of accounts receivable is due to lower sales in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010. Inventory decreased $0.2 million from $27.3 million at September 30, 2010 to $27.0 million at December 31, 2010. Due to positive changes in the availability of materials, we decreased purchasing in the first quarter as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010. Accounts payable decreased by $4.8 million from $13.2 million at September 30, 2010 to $8.5 million at December 31, 2010. Accounts payable decreased primarily due to a reduction in purchases from our suppliers as industry-wide material shortages eased, as well as the timing of payments to our vendors and other service providers. Accrued expenses decreased by $1.7 million from $16.3 million at September 30, 2010 to $14.6 million at December 31, 2010. Accrued expenses decreased primarily due to the timing of payments to our vendors and other service providers.

 

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities

 

Investing activities used $0.6 million in cash in the three months ended December 31, 2011 for capital expenditures. Investing activities used a total of $1.1 million in cash in the same period last year for capital expenditures of $0.4 million and an initial investment in an ERP system of $0.7 million.

 

27



Table of Contents

 

Net Cash Used In Financing Activities

 

Financing activities used $0.2 million in cash in the three months ended December 31, 2011 primarily relating to the repurchase and retirement of restricted stock units for payroll taxes.

 

Capital Resources, including Long-Term Debt, Contingent Liabilities and Operating Leases

 

Prospective Capital Needs

 

Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash and cash equivalent balances, cash generated from product sales, and the sales or licensing of our intellectual property. As of December 31, 2011, our cash totaled $17.0 million. Our working capital at December 31, 2011 was $24.0 million.

 

In order to achieve sustained profitability and positive cash flows from operations, we may need to further reduce operating expenses and/or increase revenue. We have completed a series of cost reduction actions which have improved our operating expense structure. We will continue to perform additional actions, as necessary. Our ability to maintain, or increase, current revenue levels to sustain profitability will depend, in part, on demand for our products. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalent balances, along with cash expected to be generated from product sales and the sale or licensing of our intellectual property, and the reduction in working capital requirements from lower inventory levels, will be sufficient to fund our operations and research and development efforts, anticipated capital expenditures, working capital, and other financing requirements for the next 12 months. In order to increase our working capital, we may seek to obtain additional debt or equity financing. However, we cannot assure you that such financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, particularly in light of recent economic conditions in the capital markets.

 

We do not have principal payments on currently outstanding debt due in the next 12 months.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

 

 

Payment Obligations by Fiscal Year

 

 

 

Remaining
in 2012

 

2013-2014

 

2015-2016

 

2017 and
thereafter

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Convertible subordinated debt (1)

 

$

 

$

 

$

46,493

 

$

 

$

46,493

 

Term A Loan (2)

 

 

7,857

 

 

 

7,857

 

Term B Loan (3)

 

 

 

9,341

 

 

9,341

 

Operating leases (4)

 

2,343

 

4,819

 

1,334

 

 

8,496

 

Software licenses (5)

 

6,744

 

6,933

 

5,600

 

5,600

 

24,877

 

Inventory and related purchase obligations (6)

 

2,572

 

434

 

 

 

 

 

3,006

 

Total

 

$

11,659

 

$

20,043

 

$

62,768

 

$

5,600

 

$

100,070

 

 


(1)                                 Convertible subordinated debt represents amounts due for our 8% convertible 2014 Debentures due October 2014.

 

(2)                                 Term A loan represents amounts due for our 10.5% fixed rate senior notes due February 2014.

 

(3)                                Term B loan represents amounts due for our 8.0% fixed rate senior notes due October 2014.

 

(4)                                 We lease facilities under non-cancellable operating lease agreements that expire at various dates through 2016. During 2011, we elected to exit our Calle Carga facility, but still have obligations under the lease. Gross lease amounts for the Calle Carga facility are included in these amounts. The Calle Carga lease amounts presented have not been adjusted for any potential sublease income as allowed under relevant accounting guidance.

 

(5)                                 Software license commitments represent non-cancellable licenses of IP from third-parties used in the development of our products.

 

(6)                                 Inventory and related purchase obligations represent non-cancellable purchase commitments for wafers and substrate parts. For purposes of the table above, inventory and related purchase obligations are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms. Our purchase orders are based on our current manufacturing needs and are typically fulfilled by our vendors within a relatively short time.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

At December 31, 2011 we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements, other than operating leases.

 

28



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011. There have been no material changes to these risks during the three months ended December 31, 2011.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated as of December 31, 2011 the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, during the quarter ended December 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Inherent Limitation on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

 

Our disclosure controls and procedures provide our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer reasonable assurances that our disclosure controls and procedures will achieve their objectives. However, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting can or will prevent all human error. A control system, no matter how well designed and implemented, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Furthermore, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are internal resource constraints, and the benefit of controls must be weighed relative to their corresponding costs. Because of the limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide complete assurance that all control issues and instances of error, if any, within the Company are detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur due to human error or mistake. Additionally, controls, no matter how well designed, could be circumvented by the individual acts of specific persons within the organization. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated objectives under all potential future conditions.

 

29



Table of Contents

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

From time-to-time in our normal course of business, we are a party to various legal claims, actions and complaints. Although the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined, management believes that, as of December 31, 2011, the final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations, or liquidity of the Company.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011.

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Filed

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File Number

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.1*

 

Amendment to Letter Agreement, dated effective November 30, 2011, between the Registrant and Dr. Martin C. Nuss.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

10.2*†

 

Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation Fiscal Year 2012 Executive Bonus Plan, dated as of December 1, 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

31.1

 

Certification of Principal Executive officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

31.2

 

Certification of Principal Financial officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

32.1

 

Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 


*                 Each a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this annual report on Form 10-K.

**          XBRL information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

                 Certain portions of this agreement have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for an order granting confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

30



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

February 7, 2012

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ CHRISTOPHER R. GARDNER

 

 

Christopher R. Gardner

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

February 7, 2012

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ MARTIN S. MCDERMUT

 

 

Martin S. McDermut

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

31