Attached files

file filename
EX-32 - ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INCv240119_ex32.htm
EX-31.1 - ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INCv240119_ex31-1.htm
EX-31.2 - ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INCv240119_ex31-2.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INCFinancial_Report.xls
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2011

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to __________

Commission file number: 000-28347

ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 
Nevada
33-0881303
 
 
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 

14785 Omicron Drive
Suite 104
San Antonio, Texas 78245
(Address of principal executive offices)

(210) 677-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer:  (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨        Accelerated filer ¨        Non-accelerated filer ¨        Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 21,370,725 shares of common stock with a par value of $.001 outstanding as of November 9, 2011.
 
 
 

 
 
ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INC.

FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
2
   
ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2
   
ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
14
   
ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
19
   
ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
20
   
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
22
   
ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
22
   
ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS
22
   
ITEM 2 – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
22
   
ITEM 3 – DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
22
   
ITEM 4 – (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
22
   
ITEM 5 – OTHER INFORMATION
22
   
ITEM 6 – EXHIBITS
23
 
 
 

 
 
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

   
September 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
   
(Unaudited)
       
ASSETS
           
Current assets:
           
    Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 2,461,847     $ 3,524,496  
    Accounts receivable
    429       7,379  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    26,721        
        Total current assets
    2,488,997       3,531,875  
                 
Equipment, net
    11,967       16,232  
Deposits and other assets
          2,047  
        Total assets
  $ 2,500,964     $ 3,550,154  
                 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
               
                 
Current liabilities:
               
                 
    Accounts payable
  $ 705,723     $ 506,685  
    Accrued expenses
    943,562       942,102  
    Derivative liability
    400,570       301,405  
    Notes payable
    100,000       100,000  
    Accrued interest payable
    64,375       43,638  
        Total current liabilities
    2,214,230       1,893,830  
                 
Commitments and contingencies
               
                 
Equity:
               
    Common stock, $.001 par value; 147,397,390 shares authorized, 21,370,725 and 21,149,675 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively
        21,370           21,149  
    Additional paid-in capital
    20,115,545       19,889,722  
    Accumulated deficit
    (19,850,181 )     (18,254,547 )
       Total equity
    286,734       1,656,324  
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 2,500,964     $ 3,550,154  

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
 
 
2

 
 
ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)

   
Three Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
   
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
Revenue
  $     $     $     $  
                                 
Operating expenses:
                               
Research and development
    457,193       128,432       799,183       384,048  
General and administrative
    227,267       386,208       896,612       1,090,286  
Total operating expenses
    684,460       514,640       1,695,795       1,474,334  
                                 
Operating loss from continuing operations
    (684,460 )     (514,640 )     (1,695,795 )     (1,474,334 )
                                 
Other income (expense):
                               
                                 
Interest expense
    (1,663 )     (33,290 )     (15,136 )     (130,097 )
Extinguishment of royalty liability
                      520,000  
Gain (loss) on derivative liability
    198,384       (127,773 )     (99,165 )     (331,735 )
Gain on sale of subsidiary
    204,438               204,438          
Other
    5,104       107,346       10,024       (51,104 )
Total other income (expense), net
    406,263       (53,717 )     100,161       7,064  
                                 
Loss from continuing operations
    (278,197 )     (568,357 )     (1,595,634 )     (1,467,270 )
                                 
Discontinued operations:
                               
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
     –        (157,141 )      –        (263,809 )
Loss from discontinued operations
           (157,141 )            (263,809 )
                                 
Net loss
    (278,197 )     (725,498 )     (1,595,634 )     (1,731,079 )
Net loss attributable to contingently redeemable noncontrolling interest (discontinued operations)
              30,259                 54,735  
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest (discontinued operations)
     –         7,999        –         14,470  
Net loss attributable to OncoVista Innovative Therapies
  $ (278,197 )   $ (687,240 )   $ (1,595,634 )   $ (1,661,874 )
                                 
Net loss per share from continuing operations - basic and diluted
  $ (0.01 )   $ (0.03 )   $ (0.07 )   $ (0.08 )
Net loss per share from discontinued operations - basic and diluted
  $     $   *   $     $ (0.01 )
                                 
Amounts attributable to OncoVista Innovative Therapies
                               
Loss from continuing operations
  $ (278,197 )   $ (568,357 )   $ (1,595,634 )   $ (1,467,270 )
Loss from discontinued operations
  $ -     $ (118,883 )   $     $ (194,604 )
Net loss
  $ (278,197 )   $ (687,240 )   $ (1,595,634 )   $ (1,661,874 )
                                 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period - basic and diluted
       21,369,026          20,483,008          21,289,254          20,483,008  

*  Less than $0.01
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

 
3

 

ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Cash flows from operating activities
           
Net loss
  $ (1,595,634 )   $ (1,731,079 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash  used in operating activities:
               
                 
Loss from discontinued operations
          263,809  
Gain on sale of subsidiary
    (204,438 )        
Depreciation
    4,996       6,969  
Amortization of debt discount
          169,655  
Employee stock-based compensation
    101,823       921,905  
Non-employee stock-based consulting
    6,077       36,413  
Common stock issued for consulting
    88,500        
Non-employee stock-based consulting expense (warrants)
    12,567       63,708  
Gain on extinguishment of royalty liability
            (520,000 )
Loss on derivative liability
    99,165       331,736  
Loss on disposal of assets
    2,129        
Loss on legal settlement
    9,000        
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    6,950       (18 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    (24,674 )      
Accounts payable
    199,040       246,086  
Accrued expenses
    1,460       (449,457 )
Accrued interest payable
    20,737       87,641  
Net cash used in continuing operations
    (1,272,302 )     (572,632 )
Net cash generated by  discontinued operations
          220,343  
Net cash used in operating activities
    (1,272,302 )     (352,289 )
                 
Cash flows from investing activities
               
Purchase of equipment
    (2,860 )      
Net cash provided by sale of subsidiary
    204,438          
Net cash used in continuing operations
    201,578        
Net cash used in discontinued operations
          (5,136 )
Net cash used in investing activities
    201,578       (5,136 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities
               
Proceeds from loans and notes payable, related party
          196,712  
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    8,075       -  
Net cash provided by continuing operations
    8,075       196,712  
Net cash provided by discontinued operations
          111,593  
Net cash provided by financing activities
    8,075       308,305  
                 
Net cash used in continuing operations
    (1,062,649 )     (375,920 )
Net cash provided by discontinued operations
          326,800  
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (1,062,649 )     (49,120 )
                 
Effect of exchange rates on cash
          94,423  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    3,524,496       108,994  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 2,461,847     $ 154,297  
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 1,213     $ 665  
 
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

 
4

 

Note 1.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION, ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. (“OVIT”) is a biopharmaceutical company developing targeted anticancer therapies by utilizing tumor-associated biomarkers. OVIT’s product pipeline is comprised of early (Phase I/II) clinical-stage compounds, late preclinical drug candidates and early preclinical leads. OVIT is not committed to any single treatment modality or class of compound, but believes that successful treatment of cancer requires a tailored approach based upon individual patient disease characteristics.

Through its former subsidiary, AdnaGen AG (“AdnaGen”), OVIT previously developed diagnostic kits for several cancer indications, and marketed diagnostic kits in Europe for the detection of circulating tumor cells (“CTCs”) in patients with cancer.

On October 28, 2010, OVIT entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Alere Holdings Bermuda Limited Canon’s Court (“Alere Holdings”), whereby OVIT sold all of its shares, representing approximately 78% of the total issued and outstanding shares of AdnaGen to Alere Holdings.  Under the terms of the agreement, OVIT and the other AdnaGen shareholders agreed to sell their respective shares of AdnaGen, and all AdnaGen related business assets, to Alere Holdings for: (i) a $10 million up-front payment; (ii) $10 million in potential milestone payments contingent upon the achievement of various balance sheet objectives within 24 months; and (iii) up to $63 million in potential milestone payments contingent upon the achievement of various clinical, regulatory and sales objectives within the next 36 months.  OVIT is entitled to receive its pro rata portion of the up-front and potential milestone payments.  In November 2010, OVIT received $6.0 million, net of expenses and certain fees, as its share of the $10 million up-front payment.  In August 2011, certain expenses related to legal fees were paid to OncoVista, Inc., OVIT’s subsidiary, of approximately $204,000.

OVIT is using the proceeds from the sale of its shares in AdnaGen to fund on-going development activities for its drug candidate portfolio.  Additionally, OVIT is evaluating several opportunities to license or acquire other compounds or diagnostic technologies that it believes will provide for treatments that are highly targeted with low or no toxicity.

Note 2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position, results of operations, and changes in deficit or cash flows. It is management’s opinion, however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation.  The interim results for the period ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of results for the full fiscal year.

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the required financial information included as part of OVIT’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
 
5

 
 
Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OVIT and OncoVista, Inc., and through October 31, 2010, the accounts of AdnaGen (collectively, the “Company”).  All intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation.  As a result of the sale of AdnaGen, the operations of AdnaGen have been presented as discontinued operations.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Significant estimates include the valuation of warrants and stock options granted for services or compensation, estimates relating to the fair value of derivative liabilities and the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.

Net Loss per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding including the effect of share equivalents.  Common stock equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of certain common stock purchase warrants and stock options.

As the Company has had losses from continuing operations for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, all unvested restricted stock, stock options and warrants are considered to be anti-dilutive.  At September 30, 2011 and 2010, the following shares have been excluded since their inclusion in the computation of diluted EPS would be anti-dilutive:

   
2011
   
2010
 
Stock options outstanding under various stock option plans
    1,381,500       650,000  
Warrants
    4,331,712       4,306,712  
                 
Total
    5,713,212       4,956,712  

For the purpose of the computation of net income per share, unvested restricted shares (see Note 10) are considered contingently returnable shares.  These shares, although classified as issued and outstanding, are not included in basic weighted average number of shares at September 30, 2010.  The remaining restricted shares vested on January 1, 2011, and are included in basic weighted average number of shares at September 30, 2011.

Share-Based Compensation
 
All share-based payments to employees are recorded and expensed in the statements of operations under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation.”  ASC 718 requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including grants of employee stock options, based on estimated fair values.  The Company has used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate grant date fair value for all option grants.

Share-based compensation expense is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the year, less expected forfeitures.  ASC 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
 
 
6

 
 
Reclassifications

Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to reflect the results of discontinued operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06), which amends the existing fair value measurement and disclosure guidance currently included in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, to require additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Specifically, ASU 2010-06 requires entities to disclose the amounts of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for these transfers, the reasons for any transfer in or out of Level 3 and information in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. In addition, ASU 2010-06 also clarifies the requirement for entities to disclose information about both the valuation techniques and inputs used in estimating Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 was effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2010, except for additional disclosures related to Level 3 fair value measurements, which was effective beginning January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements or results of operations.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-17, Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method (Topic 605), which provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition to research or development arrangements. Under this guidance, the Company may recognize revenue contingent upon the achievement of a milestone in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved, only if the milestone meets all the criteria within the guidance to be considered substantive. This amendment was effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2011.   The adoption of ASU 2010-17 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Note 3.
MANAGEMENT’S PLANS

As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company reported a net loss of approximately $1.6 million, and net cash used in continuing operations of approximately $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an accumulated deficit of approximately $19.9 million and total equity of approximately $0.3 million at September 30, 2011. The Company is also in default on a certain loan and related accrued interest aggregating $164,375 at September 30, 2011 (see Note 6). The Company is currently in discussions with the debt holder to negotiate repayment of the outstanding unsecured note. In November 2010, the Company received approximately $6.0 million as its share of the up-front payment from the sale of its shares of AdnaGen described in Note 1. As a result of the stock purchase agreement with Alere Holdings, management believes that the Company has sufficient capital to meet its anticipated operating cash requirements for the next 12 to 15 months.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.  These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery of the recorded assets or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on management’s ability to further implement its strategic plan, obtain additional capital, principally by obtaining additional debt and/or equity financing, and generate revenues from collaborative agreements or sale of pharmaceutical products.

As a result of the proceeds received pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement with Alere Holdings, the Company has eliminated substantially all of its outstanding debt.  The Company has only one convertible note payable outstanding in the principal amount of $100,000, which is in default and is due on demand. The Company is using the balance of the proceeds from the sale of our shares in AdnaGen to fund on-going development activities for its drug candidate portfolio.  Additionally, the Company is evaluating several opportunities to license or acquire other compounds or diagnostic technologies that it believes will provide for treatments that are highly targeted, efficacious and with low or no toxicity.
 
 
7

 
 
Note 4.
EQUIPMENT

Equipment balances at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized below:

   
2011
   
2010
 
Equipment
  $ 30,132     $ 30,132  
Computer and office equipment
    9,326       6,466  
Furniture and fixtures
          5,554  
      39,458       42,152  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (27,491 )     (25,920 )
Equipment, net
  $ 11,967     $ 16,232  

Note 5.
ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized below:

   
2011
   
2010
 
Legal and professional
  $ 2,500     $ 55,000  
Clinical and other studies
    149,006       233,090  
Compensation
    267,968       239,469  
Minimum royalty
    522,500       410,000  
Other
    1,588       4,543  
Total accrued expenses
  $ 943,562     $ 942,102  

Note 6.
DEBT

The Company has one outstanding unsecured note in the amount of $100,000 plus $64,375 in accrued interest at 8%, payable to a third party and due on demand.  The debt holder, at its option, may convert the principal and any accrued interest into shares of common stock at a price of $2.50 per share. The note payable matured in December 2005, and the Company is currently in default. The Company is currently in discussions with the debt holder to negotiate repayment of the outstanding unsecured note.

Note 7.
DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

The Company determined that warrants issued in connection with the bridge round of debt financing entered into by the Company in January 2009 required liability classification due to certain provisions that may result in an adjustment to the number shares issued upon settlement (see Note 10).
 
In January 2010, the Company amended certain terms of the 2009 Bridge Note financing agreement, which did not affect the liability classification of the associated warrants.  In consideration for the modifications, the Company extended the expiration date for the warrants to July 15, 2014, and the exercise price of the warrants was reduced to $0.10 per share.  The modification of the terms of the warrants resulted in an additional expense of $67,172 at the amendment date.  In July 2010, certain terms for the warrants were further modified to increase by 50% the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants, and extend the expiration date for the warrants to December 31, 2014.  The modification of the terms of the warrants resulted in an additional expense of $129,603 at the amendment date.  The estimated fair value of the derivative liability was $400,570 and $301,405 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the fair value of its warrant liabilities.  Key assumptions used to apply these models are as follows:

     
2011
   
2010
 
Expected term
   
3-4 years
   
4-5 years
 
Volatility
   
86.5%
   
86.5%
 
Risk-free interest rate
   
0.42%-0.43%
   
0.43%-1.515%
 
Dividend yield
   
0%
   
0%
 
 
 
8

 
 
Fair value measurements

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, are as follows:

   
 
Value at
   
Quoted prices in 
active markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant other 
observable inputs
(Level 2)
   
Significant 
unobservable 
inputs
(Level 3)
Derivative liability
                   
2011 30 September
  $ 400,570         $ 400,570      
 2010 31 December
  $ 301,405         $ 301,405      

The fair value framework requires a categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets and liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

There were no financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value, with the exception of cash and cash equivalents and the above mentioned derivative liability as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The fair values of accounts receivable, accounts payable and third-party debt approximate the carrying amounts due to the short term nature of these instruments.

Note 8.
LEASES, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Matters

On December 17, 2007, an action was filed against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, entitled Bridge Ventures, Inc. v. OncoVista, Inc. and Centrecourt Asset Management. The action seeks damages for the alleged breach of a consulting agreement and seeks an order directing the issuance of warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the action, and on April 3, 2008 the motion was denied.  The Company answered the complaint and asserted a counterclaim seeking compensation for the expenses that it incurred during the time that it worked with Bridge Ventures, Inc. The parties signed a settlement agreement, under which the Company paid $1,000 and issued 45,000 shares of its common stock. In March 2011, the Company issued the shares required by the settlement agreement, and recorded settlement expense of $9,000 related to the issuance of these shares.

On August 11, 2011, an action was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, entitled New Millennium PR Communications, Inc., against OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc., The action seeks damages for the alleged breach of a public relations agreement and seeks an order directing a cash payment of $75,750 and the issuance of warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The action seeks damages for the alleged breach of an agreement and seeks an order directing a cash payment and the issuance of warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock. On October 5, 2011, the Company sent a notice of motion to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking to dismiss the case due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. New Millennium PR Communications, Inc. filed an opposition to the Company’s request for dismissal. The court has not yet ruled on the motion to dismiss. Based on a review of the current operative complaint, the Company believes that the plaintiff’s allegations are without merit, and intends to rigorously defend against the claim.
 
 
9

 
 
On August 26, 2011, an action was filed against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, entitled CAMOFI Master LDC and CAMHZN LDC against OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. and OncoVista, Inc. The action seeks damages for the alleged breach of a Subscription Agreement, a Warrant Agreement and an Anti-Dilution Agreement and seeks an order directing the issuance of (i) an aggregate of 1,980,712,767 shares of the Company’s common stock, and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 702,857,767 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.001. On October 20, 2011, the Company filed an answer to the complaint. On November 1, 2011, the plaintiffs made an extensive document request to the Company for all documents related to the matter.  Based on a review of the current operative complaint, the Company believes that the plaintiff’s allegations are without merit, and intends to rigorously defend against the claim.

Note 9.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D., Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors and its Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and a significant shareholder, is a beneficial owner of Lipitek International, Inc. and Lipitek Research, LLC.  The Company leases its laboratory space from Lipitek, Inc. under a three-year lease agreement for $12,000 per month.  Management believes that rent is based on reasonable and customary rates as if the space were rented to a third party.

On November 17, 2005, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with Lipitek and Dr. Weis, under which Lipitek granted the Company an option to purchase all membership interests in Lipitek Research, LLC (Lipitek Research) for a purchase price of $5.0 million, which is payable quarterly based upon revenues of Lipitek Research up to $50,000 per quarter.  Through September 30, 2011, the Company had paid a total of $550,000 toward this agreement and has accrued $400,000 and $250,000, which is included in accounts payable in the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively and recorded as research and development expense. During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company made no payments toward the agreement.

Prior to the full payment of the purchase price, the Company has the option, upon 30 days written notice, to abandon the purchase of Lipitek Research and would forfeit the amounts already paid.  All intellectual property developments by Lipitek Research through the term of the agreement or 2012, whichever is later, shall remain the Company’s property, irrespective of whether the option is exercised.  In addition, the Company will receive 80% of the research and development revenue earned by Lipitek while the agreement is in place. In the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not recognize any revenue from its share of Lipitek revenues.

Note 10.
CHANGES IN EQUITY

Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 147,397,390 shares of common stock. At September 30, 2011, shares of common stock reserved for future issuance are as follows:

Stock options outstanding
    1,381,500  
Warrants outstanding
    4,331,712  
Stock options available for grant
     2,159,250  
      7,872,462  

Restricted Stock

In October 2007, the Company granted an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of common stock to certain officers valued at $3.5 million based upon the quoted closing trading price on the date of issuance.  These shares vested two thirds on January 1, 2010 and one third on January 1, 2011.  As of September 30, 2011, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock.

In February 2011, the Company engaged a firm to provide public relations and media services for an initial fee of $25,000 for a period of three months.  In April 2011, the agreement was amended to extend the engagement until July 1, 2011 and provided for the issuance of 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock issued in April 2011, and a fee of $40,000 payable in May 2011. The Company recognized $88,500 as public relations expense which is included in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
 
 
10

 
 
Stock Option Plans

All option grants are expensed in the appropriate period based upon each award’s vesting terms, in each case with an offsetting credit to additional paid in capital. Under the authoritative guidance for share based compensation, in the event of termination, the Company will cease to recognize compensation expense. There is no deferred compensation recorded upon initial grant date, instead, the fair value of the share-based payment is recognized ratably over the stated vesting period.

The Company granted stock options to employees, consultants and directors to acquire 658,600 shares of common stock for future services having a fair market value of $153,454 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.  Vesting periods for these options included the following: monthly over two years and monthly over four years.    No options were granted for the same period in 2010.

The stock-based compensation expense recorded by the Company with respect to awards under the Company’s stock plans is as follows:

   
Three Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
   
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
Research and development
  $ 12,806     $     $ 39,727     $  
                                 
General and administrative
    17,643       15,636       62,096       46,905  
                                 
Total employee stock-based compensation
  $ 30,449     $ 15,636     $ 101,823     $ 46,905  

In addition to options granted to employees, the Company historically granted options to consultants and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, recognized $6,077 and $36,413, respectively, as consulting expense.  Such amounts are included in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

The Company has followed fair value accounting and the related authoritative guidance for share-based compensation. The fair value of each option or warrant granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

The assumptions used in Black-Scholes for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

   
September 30,
   
2011
 
2010
Risk-free interest rate
 
1.03-2.02%
 
0.45-1.46%
Expected dividend yield
 
0%
 
0%
Expected volatility
 
100.5%
 
86.5%
Expected life of option
 
10 years
 
10 years
Expected forfeitures
 
0%
 
0%
 
 
11

 
 
The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity:

   
Shares
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2011
    949,000     $ 1.20          
    Granted
    658,600       0.31          
    Exercised
    (26,050 )     0.31          
    Forfeited
    (200,050 )     0.39          
Outstanding at September 30, 2011
    1,381,500     $ 0.91  
7.09 years
  $ 407,121  
Options Exercisable at September 30, 2011
    887,750     $ 1.22  
5.90 years
  $ 88,658  

The following summarizes the activity of the Company’s stock options that have not vested for the nine months ended September 30, 2011:

   
Shares
   
Weighted
Average
Fair Value
 
Nonvested at January 1, 2011
    336,000     $ 0.40  
Granted
    658,600       0.21  
Vested
    (300,825 )     0.33  
Cancelled or forfeited
    (200,025 )     0.32  
Outstanding at September 30, 2011
    493,750       0.21  

Warrants

In January 2011, the Company engaged a firm to provide public relations and media services and issued a warrant to acquire 25,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $0.35, with the shares vesting in equal monthly installments over three months. The Company recognized $12,567 as consulting expense which is included in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the agreement provides for a fee of $4,000 per month for three months.

The Black-Scholes assumptions used for warrants for the period ended September 30, 2011 are as follows:

Risk-free interest rate
 
0.98%
Expected dividend yield
 
0%
Expected volatility
 
100.5%
Contractual life of warrants
 
5 years
Expected forfeitures
 
0%

The following is a summary of the Company’s warrant activity:
   
Shares
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2011
    4,306,712     $ 1.73  
Granted
    25,000       0.35  
Exercised
           
Forfeited
           
Outstanding at September 30, 2011
     4,331,712     $ 1.72  
Exercisable at September 30, 2011
     4,331,712     $ 1.72  
 
 
12

 
 
Note 11.
SEGMENT INFORMATION

Through October 2010, the Company maintained a controlling interest in AdnaGen, a research and development company based in Langenhagen, Germany, which focused on the development of innovative tumor diagnostics by utilizing its proprietary technology for the detection and analysis of rare cells.  In October 2010, the Company sold all of its shares in AdnaGen. AdnaGen is reported as discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2011.  As a result of the sale of AdnaGen, the Company has only one operating segment, developing targeted anticancer therapies by utilizing tumor-associated biomarkers.

A summary of the Company’s operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is provided below:

   
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
 
   
OncoVista
   
AdnaGen
   
Total
 
Revenues
  $     $     $  
Operating expenses
    684,460             684,460  
 (Loss) income from operations
    (684,460 )           (684,460 )
Other expense
    406,263             406,263  
Net loss
  $ (278,197 )   $     $ (278,197 )

   
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
 
   
OncoVista
   
AdnaGen(1)
   
Total
 
Revenues
  $     $ 248,900     $ 248,900  
Operating expenses
    514,640       351,146       865,786  
Loss from operations
    (514,640 )     (102,246 )     (616,886 )
Other income (expense)
    (36,959 )     (71,653 )     (108,612 )
Net loss
  $ (551,599 )   $ (173,899 )   $ (725,498 )

   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
 
   
OncoVista
   
AdnaGen
   
Total
 
Revenues
  $     $     $  
Operating expenses
    1,695,795             1,695,795  
 (Loss) income from operations
    (1,695,795 )           (1,695,795 )
Other expense
    100,161             100,161  
Net loss
  $ (1,595,634 )   $     $ (1,595,634 )
Total assets
  $ 2,500,964     $     $ 2,500,964  

   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
 
   
OncoVista
   
AdnaGen(1)
   
Total
 
Revenues
  $     $ 907,722     $ 907,722  
Operating expenses
    1,474,334       1,014,477       2,488,811  
                         
Loss from operations
    (1,474,334 )     (106,755 )     (1,581,089 )
Other income (expense)
    7,064       (157,055 )     (149,990 )
Net loss
  $ (1,467,270 )   $ (263,810 )   $ (1,731,079 )
Total assets
  $ 76,175     $ 276,261     $ 352,436  

 
(1)
Presented as discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
 
 
13

 
 
ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains not only statements that are historical facts, but also statements that are forward-looking (within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)).  Forward-looking statements are, by their very nature, uncertain and risky.  These risks and uncertainties include international, national and local general economic and market conditions; demographic changes; our ability to sustain, manage, or forecast growth; our ability to successfully make and integrate acquisitions; raw material costs and availability; new product development and introduction; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; adverse publicity; competition; the loss of significant customers or suppliers; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results; changes in business strategy or development plans; business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the ability to protect technology; and other risks that might be detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Although the forward-looking statements in this report reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by them.  Consequently, and because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, the actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements.  You are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports as we attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and prospects.

As used in this Quarterly Report, the terms “we,” “us,” and “our,” mean OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc., our current subsidiary, OncoVista, Inc. (“OncoVista”) and our former subsidiary, AdnaGen A.G. (“AdnaGen”), collectively, unless otherwise indicated.

Overview

We are a biopharmaceutical company developing targeted anticancer therapies by utilizing tumor-associated biomarkers. Our therapeutic strategy is based on targeting the patient’s tumor(s) with treatments that will deliver drugs selectively based upon specific biochemical characteristics of the cancer cells comprising the tumor. Through a combination of licensing agreements, as well as mergers and acquisitions, we have acquired the rights to several technologies with the potential to more effectively treat cancers and significantly improve quality-of-life for patients. We believe that the development of targeted approaches to the administration of anticancer agents should lead to improved outcomes and reduced toxicity.

We previously developed diagnostic kits through our former majority-owned German operating subsidiary, AdnaGen, for several cancer indications, and marketed diagnostic kits in Europe for the detection of circulating tumor cells (“CTCs”) in patients with cancer. On October 28, 2010, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Alere Holdings Bermuda Limited Canon’s Court (“Alere Holdings”), whereby we, and the other AdnaGen shareholders, agreed to sell our respective shares of AdnaGen, and all AdnaGen related business assets, to Alere Holdings for: (i) a $10 million up-front payment; (ii) $10 million in potential milestone payments contingent upon the achievement of various balance sheet objectives within 24 months; and (iii) up to $63 million in potential milestone payments contingent upon the achievement of various clinical, regulatory and sales objectives within next 36 months. We are entitled to receive our pro rata portion of approximately 78% of the up-front and potential milestone payments.  In November 2010, we received $6.0 million, net of expenses and certain fees, as our share of the $10 million up-front payment.

As a result of the proceeds received pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement with Alere Holdings, we have eliminated substantially all of our outstanding debt.  We have only one convertible note payable outstanding in the principal amount of $100,000, which is in default and is due on demand. We are currently in discussions with the note holder and are attempting to negotiate repayment of the convertible note. We are using the balance of the proceeds from the sale of our shares in AdnaGen to fund on-going development activities for our drug candidate portfolio.  Additionally, we are evaluating several opportunities to license or acquire other compounds or diagnostic technologies that we believe will provide for treatments that are highly targeted, efficacious and with low or no toxicity.

 
14

 

Development Programs

Our most advanced product candidate is Cordycepin (OVI-123) which is in Phase I/II clinical trials for refractory leukemia patients who express the enzyme terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT). We have received orphan drug designation from the US Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for Cordycepin which affords us seven years of market exclusivity once the drug is approved for marketing. We initiated a Phase I/II trial based on the “original” ADA-sensitive compound in the second quarter of 2008. The trial was initiated at two U.S. centers, The Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Massachusetts, and the Cancer Therapy Research Center at the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, Texas, and is designed to enroll up to 24 patients in the first stage and up to 20 patients in the second stage.  In October 2009, after enrolling five patients in this clinical trial, we placed the clinical trial on administrative hold due to our limited capital resources. We are in the process of reinitiating the Phase I/II clinical trials to determine the maximum tolerated dose, and expect to start enrolling patients in the first quarter of 2012. We have engaged a clinical research organization (“CRO”) in France to do some additional pre-clinical in-vitro evaluations of Cordycepin and the ADA inhibitor Pentostatin with the intent of gaining a better understanding of the inhibition effects of Pentostatin on Cordycepin. The outcome of this phase of development will likely result in restarting the Phase 1/2 trial in Q1 2012.

We have completed Good Laboratory Practices (“GLP”) animal drug safety studies in two species with OVI-117 necessary for submission of an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application. We have begun to compile the IND application for submission to the FDA, which is a key step to conducting human clinical trials and expect to launch a Phase I trial in the first quarter of 2012.

Other Research and Development Plans

In addition to conducting Phase I and Phase II clinical trials, we plan to conduct pre-clinical research to accomplish the following:

 
·
further deepen and broaden our understanding of the mechanism of action (MoA) of our products in cancer;
 
·
develop alternative delivery systems and determine the optimal dosage for different patient groups;
 
·
demonstrate proof of concept in animal models of human cancers; and
 
·
develop successor products to our current products.
 
 
Other Strategic Plans

In addition to developing our existing anti-cancer drug portfolio, we plan to obtain rights to additional drug candidates or diagnostic technologies through licensing, partnerships, and mergers/acquisitions. Our efforts in this area will be guided by business considerations (cost of the opportunity, fit with existing portfolio, etc.) as well as input from our clinical advisory board regarding likelihood of successful clinical development and marketing approval. Our goal is to create a well-balanced product portfolio including lead molecules in different stages of development and addressing different medical needs.
 
Results of Operations

Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Research and development. Research and development expenses increased by approximately $329,000, or 257%, to approximately $457,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to approximately $128,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010.  The increase in 2011 is primarily due to the conduct of the additional animal toxicity and safety trial for OVI-117 and for the determination on how and where to reinitiate our patient enrollment in our Phase I/II clinical trials for Cordycepin (OVI-123).

General and administrative.  General and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $159,000, or 41%, to approximately $227,267 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to approximately $386,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010.  The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in stock-based compensation from prior year, partially offset by an increase in compensation, as well as an increase in consulting expense for professional services.
 
 
15

 
 
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense) increased approximately $406,000, or 856%, to income of approximately $460,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to expense of approximately $54,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010.  The increase is due primarily to a settlement payment and an unrealized gain on derivative liability in the three months ending September 30, 2011.

Discontinued Operations. The results of operations for our former majority-owned German operating subsidiary, AdnaGen, are classified as discontinued operations. On October 31, 2010, we ceased operations at AdnaGen upon the sale to Alere Holdings. Revenues included in discontinued operations were approximately $249,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010.  Revenues reflected royalties earned from the sale of diagnostic kits, licensing and research and development revenue and are summarized in the following table:

   
2010
 
Diagnostic kits
  $ 216,000  
Licensing
    9,000  
Research and development, grant and other revenues
    24,000  
Total revenues
  $ 249,000  

Operating expenses included in discontinued operations were approximately $351,000 for the three month period ended September 30, 2010, including research and development expenses of approximately $156,000 and general and administrative expense of approximately $195,000.
 
Loss from discontinued operations was approximately $174,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of interest expense for the three month period ended September 30, 2010.

Net Loss. As a result of the foregoing, our net loss decreased by approximately $447,000, or 62%, to a net loss of approximately $278,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, compared to a net loss of approximately $725,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Research and development. Research and development expenses increased by approximately $415,000, or 108%, to approximately $799,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to approximately $384,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  The increase in 2011 is primarily due to the rehiring of our Chief Operating Officer to develop our existing anti-cancer drug portfolio including reinitiating our patient enrollment in our Phase I/II clinical trials for Cordycepin (OVI-123), as well as conducting an additional preclinical safety study and the submission of an IND to the FDA for OVI-117.

General and administrative.  General and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $194,000, or 18%, to approximately $897,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to approximately $1,090,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in stock-based compensation from the prior year, partially offset by an increase in compensation, as well as an increase in consulting expense for professional services.

Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense) increased $93,000, or 1,318%, to income of approximately $100,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to income of approximately $7,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  The increase is due primarily to the settlement payment of approximately $204,000 regarding the sale of AdnaGen to Alere Holdings as well as a decrease of approximately $109,000 in interest expense as a result of the sale of AdnaGen in the prior year.  The income increase also includes a decrease of approximately $233,000 or 70%, in the loss on derivative liability of approximately $99,000 in 2011, compared to a loss of $332,000 in 2010, related to our prior debt financing.

Discontinued Operations. The results of operations for our former majority-owned German operating subsidiary, AdnaGen are classified as discontinued operations. On October 31, 2010, we ceased operations at AdnaGen upon the sale to Alere Holdings. Revenues included in discontinued operations were approximately $908,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Revenues reflected royalties earned from the sale of diagnostic kits, licensing and research and development revenue and are summarized in the following table:
 
 
16

 
 
   
2010
 
Diagnostic kits
  $ 794,180  
Licensing
    73,700  
Research and development, grant and other revenues
    39,842  
         
Total revenues
  $ 907,722  

Operating expenses included in discontinued operations were approximately $1,014,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, including research and development expenses of approximately $477,000 and general and administrative expense of approximately $538,000.
 
Loss from discontinued operations was approximately $315,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of interest expense for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010.

Net Loss. As a result of the foregoing, our net loss decreased by approximately $135,000, or 7%, to a net loss of approximately $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to a net loss of approximately $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Going Concern and Recent Events

Our consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. We reported a net loss of approximately $1.6 million, and net cash used in continuing operations of approximately $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an accumulated deficit of approximately $19.9 million and total equity of approximately $0.3 million at September 30, 2011. We are also in default on certain loans and related accrued interest aggregating $164,375 at September 30, 2011.

In November 2010, we received approximately $6.0 million as our pro rata portion of the up-front payment from the sale of our shares of AdnaGen as described above.  As a result of the stock purchase agreement with Alere Holdings, we now have sufficient capital to meet our anticipated operating cash requirements for the next 12 to 15 months.

Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on the success of management’s plans to achieve the following:

 
·
Continue to aggressively seek investment capital;
 
·
Develop our product pipeline;
 
·
Advance scientific progress in our research and development; and
 
·
Continue to monitor and implement cost control initiatives to conserve cash.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At September 30, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $2.5 million compared to $3.5 million at December 31, 2010. In order to preserve principal and maintain liquidity, our funds are primarily invested in checking and interest bearing saving accounts with the primary objective of capital preservation. Based on our current projections, we believe that our available resources and cash flow are sufficient to meet our anticipated operating cash needs for the next 12 to 15 months.  Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent our ability to further implement our strategic plan, continue to obtain additional debt and/or equity financing, and generate additional revenues from collaborative agreements.

To date, we have financed our operations principally through proceeds of offerings of securities exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, the proceeds from the sale of AdnaGen and debt financing provided by related parties. We can provide no assurance that additional funding will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Accordingly, we may not be able to secure the funding which is required to expand research and development programs beyond their current levels or at levels that may be required in the future. If we cannot secure adequate financing, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate one or more of our research and development programs or to enter into license or other arrangements with third parties to commercialize products or technologies that we would otherwise seek to develop and commercialize ourselves. Our future capital requirements will depend upon many factors, including:
 
 
17

 
 
 
·
Continued scientific progress in our research and development programs;
 
·
Costs and timing of conducting clinical trials and seeking regulatory approvals and patent prosecutions;
 
·
Competing technological and market developments; and
 
·
Our ability to establish additional collaborative relationships.
 
 
Accordingly, we may be required to issue equity or debt securities or enter into other financial arrangements, including relationships with corporate and other partners, in order to raise additional capital. Depending upon market conditions, we may not be successful in raising sufficient additional capital for our short or long-term requirements. In such event, our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.
 
Operating Activities.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net cash used in continuing operations increased $727,000, or 127%, to approximately $1.3 million compared to approximately $573,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to a decrease in our net loss of approximately $127,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, to a net loss of $1.6 million, as compared to a net loss of approximately $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  In addition to a decrease in our net loss, stock-based compensation expense decreased approximately $820,000 primarily due to stock vesting January 2011. Additionally, accrued expenses were adjusted due to extinguishing $520,000 in liabilities related to minimum royalty payments as a result of signing a letter agreement returning technology related to tubulin isotype-specific anti-mitotics.  Operating activities were also affected by a decrease of approximately $233,000 to a loss of $99,000 in the current period for the derivative liability related to the bridge round of debt financing compared to a loss of approximately $332,000 in the prior period.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, there was no cash used by discontinued operations compared to net cash generated by discontinued operations of approximately $220,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Investing Activities.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations increased approximately $202,000, or 100%, to approximately $202,000 compared to no cash used for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  The increase is a result of purchases of equipment.

Financing Activities.  For the nine months ending September 30, 2011, net cash provided from continuing operations decreased approximately $300,000, or 97%, to $8,000 compared to cash provided of $308,000 for the nine month period ending September 30, 2010.  The change is primarily due to loans provided to us from Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D., the Chairman of our Board of Directors and our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), President, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), Secretary, and a significant shareholder, and affiliated companies in the nine month period ended September 30, 2010.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06), which amends the existing fair value measurement and disclosure guidance currently included in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, to require additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Specifically, ASU 2010-06 requires entities to disclose the amounts of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for these transfers, the reasons for any transfer in or out of Level 3 and information in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. In addition, ASU 2010-06 also clarifies the requirement for entities to disclose information about both the valuation techniques and inputs used in estimating Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 was effective for us beginning on January 1, 2010, except for additional disclosures related to Level 3 fair value measurements, which was effective beginning January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not impact our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.
 
 
18

 
 
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-17, Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method (Topic 605), which provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition to research or development arrangements. Under this guidance, we may recognize revenue contingent upon the achievement of a milestone in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved, only if the milestone meets all the criteria within the guidance to be considered substantive. This amendment was effective for us beginning on January 1, 2011.   The adoption of ASU 2010-17 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations.  The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations are disclosed throughout this section where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results.  The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition.  While we have not recognized revenues from continuing operations, we anticipate that future revenues will be generated from product sales.  We expect to recognize revenue from product sales in accordance with SEC, Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” that requires us to recognize revenue when each of the following four criteria is met: 1) a contract or sales arrangement exists; 2) products have been shipped or services have been rendered; 3) the price of the products or services is fixed or determinable; and 4) collectability is reasonably assured. We anticipate that customers will have no right of return for products sold. Revenues are considered to be earned upon shipment.

Share-Based Compensation.  We follow Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including grants of employee stock options based on estimated fair values.  We have used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate grant date fair value for all option grants.  The assumptions we use in calculating the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment.  As such, as we use different assumptions based on a change in factors, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.

Preclinical Study and Clinical Trial Accruals.  Substantially all of our preclinical studies and clinical trials are being performed by third-party CROs and other outside vendors.  For preclinical studies, we use the percentage of work completed to date and contract milestones achieved to determine the accruals recorded.  For clinical trial accruals, we use the number of patients enrolled, period of patient enrollment and percentage of work completed to date to estimate the accruals.  We monitor patient enrollment levels and related activities to the extent possible through internal reviews, correspondence and status meetings with CROs and review of contractual terms.  Our estimates are dependent on the timeliness and accuracy of data provided by our CROs and other vendors.  If we have incomplete or inaccurate data, we may under-or overestimate activity levels associated with various studies or clinical trials at a given point in time.  In this event, we could record adjustments to research and development expenses in future periods when the actual activity levels become known.  No material adjustments to preclinical study and clinical trial expenses have been recognized to date.

ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

 
19

 

ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of September 30, 2011, under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that, as of September 30, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective at the reasonable assurance level in timely alerting him to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports as a result of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting discussed below. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting is expressed at the level of reasonable assurance because a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met.
 
Management’s Quarterly Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control system is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our management and directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Because of our inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011. As a result of its assessment, management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. Based on the weakness described below, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of September 30, 2011.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that, there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As a result of our assessment, management identified the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011:

 
·
While there were internal controls and procedures in place that relate to financial reporting and the prevention and detection of material misstatements, these controls did not meet the required documentation and effectiveness requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”) and therefore, management could not certify that these controls were correctly implemented. As a result, it was management’s opinion that the lack of documentation warranted a material weakness in the financial reporting process.

 
·
Our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions. Inadequate controls include the lack of procedures used for identifying, determining, and calculating required disclosures and other supplementary information requirements.
 
 
20

 
 
 
·
There is lack of segregation of duties in financial reporting, as our financial reporting and all accounting functions are performed by a consultant. This weakness is due to our lack of working capital to hire additional staff during the period covered by this report. We intend to hire additional accounting personnel to assist with financial reporting as soon as our finances will allow.
 
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the month ended September  30, 2011, the Company contract CFO resigned and a contract CFO was hired as a replacement. There were no other significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
21

 
 
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On August 11, 2011, an action was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, entitled New Millennium PR Communications, Inc., against OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc., The action seeks damages for the alleged breach of a public relations agreement and seeks an order directing a cash payment of $75,750 and the issuance of warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The action seeks damages for the alleged breach of an agreement and seeks an order directing a cash payment and the issuance of warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock. On October 5, 2011 the Company filed a motion with the court seeking dismissal of the case due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. New Millennium PR Communications, Inc. subsequently filed a motion in opposition to our request for dismissal.  To date, there has been no ruling by the court on either motion.

On August 26, 2011, an action was filed against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, entitled CAMOFI Master LDC and CAMHZN LDC against OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. and OncoVista, Inc. The action seeks damages for the alleged breach of a Subscription Agreement, a Warrant Agreement and an Anti-Dilution Agreement and seeks an order directing the issuance of (i) an aggregate of 1,980,712,767 shares of our common stock, and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 702,857,767 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.001. On October 20, 2011 we filed an answer to the complaint whereby we addressed each of the claims made. On November 1, 2011 the plaintiffs made an extensive document request to us for all documents related to the matter.

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 2 – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

There have been no events which are required to be reported under this item.

ITEM 3 – DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

There have been no events which are required to be reported under this item.

ITEM 4 – (REMOVED AND RESERVED)


ITEM 5 – OTHER INFORMATION

There have been no events which are required to be reported under this item
 
 
22

 
 
ITEM 6 – EXHIBITS

Exhibits:

Exhibit No.
 
Description
31.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
31.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
32
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
23

 
 
SIGNATURES

           Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INC.
 
Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D.
Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: November 14, 2011
 
 
24