Exhibit 99.2

1 Investment Portfolio As of March 31, 2011

2  Asset-backed securities (ABS) Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) Commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) $40 billion  $11 billion  Corporate bonds Municipals  Treasuries Agency debentures Agency mortgages Small Business Administration loans OECD governments FFELP Student Loans Investment Portfolio  Government / Agency  Structured Securities  Unsecured Credit  Portfolio amounts are expressed at Book Value; Book Value includes the amortized cost of the transferred securities at the time they were transferred. OECD=Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development  FFELP=Federal Family Education Loan Program  ASSETS: INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO (PERIOD END 03/31/11)  $53 billion

3  Assets selected using rigorous credit process Diversified by asset class and geography  89.7% AAA / AA rated Constructed to perform well through periods of economic weakness Unrealized after-tax available for sale (AFS) & held to maturity (HTM) mark to market (MTM) loss = $(0.352)B(1)  INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL (PERIOD END 03/31/11)  Investment Portfolio  Portfolio amounts are expressed at Book Value; Book Value includes the amortized cost of the transferred securities at the time they were transferred.  At 03/31/11: After-tax Unrealized MTM Gain/(Loss) includes after-tax unrealized loss on securities available for sale of $(193)M, after-tax unrealized gain on securities held to maturity of $243M and after-tax unrealized loss primarily related to securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity of $(402)M. Certain securities previously categorized as Not Rated, are now included in the AAA category, based on Moody’s/S&P ratings. US$ in billions AAA AA A BBB <BBB Not Rated(2) Total 03/31/11 $82.9 $10.4 $6.1 $2.4 $1.9 $0.2 $103.9 79.7% 10.0%  5.8% 2.4% 1.9% 0.2% 100.0% 12/31/10 $74.8 $10.6 $5.5 $2.3 $1.9 $0.2 $95.3 78.5%   11.1%  5.8% 2.4% 2.0% 0.2% 100.0%  12/31/09 $67.9 $11.3 $6.8 $3.5 $7.5 $0.3 $97.3 69.7% 11.6% 7.0% 3.6% 7.8% 0.3% 100.0% 12/31/08 $62.0 $8.8 $3.9 $2.9 $0.8 $0.4 $78.8 78.6% 11.1% 4.9% 3.7% 1.1% 0.6% 100.0%

4  Investment Portfolio  (1)  Securities/municipals and corporate issuers added to negative credit watch within the respective quarter, excluding downgrades.(2)  Securities/municipals and corporate issuers experiencing one or more downgrades in respective quarter.  We report credit profiles based on the lower of the Moody’s or S & P ratings; based on this methodology approximately $0.3 billion of the $1.2 billion has been downgraded by another rating agency and reported in previous quarters, leaving $0.9 billion net new downgrades in the first quarter of 2011. At 03/31/11: After-tax Unrealized MTM Gain/(Loss) includes after-tax unrealized loss on securities available for sale of $(193)M, after-tax unrealized gain on securities held to maturity of $243M and after-tax unrealized loss primarily related to securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity of $(402)M. All previously discounted or impaired.  INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO (AT PERIOD END)  Portfolio amounts are expressed at Book Value; Book Value includes the amortized cost of the transferred securities at the time they were transferred. Q4 ’09 Q1 ’10 Q2 ’10 Q3 ’10 Q4 ’10 Q1 ’11 Q1 ’11 Asset Value Size of portfolio $97.3B $95.6B $100.2B $99.6B $95.3B  $103.9B — Size of portfolio $97.3B $95.6B $100.2B $99.6B $95.3B $103.9B — Ratings 69.7% AAA 11.6% AA 69.5% AAA 11.7% AA  71.4% AAA 10.9% AA 71.3% AAA 11.1% AA 78.5% AAA 11.1% AA 79.7% AAA 10.0% AA —    Unrealized after-tax MTM gain/(loss) Credit watch(1) Credit watch ex Munis(1) Downgrades(2) Downgrades ex Munis(2) Defaults(4)  $(2,286)M $(1,435)M $(994)M $(281)M $(504)M $(352)M(3) — 70 391 165 62 31 159 $6.5B 68 391 164 62 30 158 $6.5B 112 189 239 120  39 128 $1.2B 76 181 233 117 33 33 108 $0.8B 6 9 4 13 3 3 $34M

5  Investment Portfolio  HOLDINGS BY ASSET CLASS (PERIOD END 03/31/11)  Portfolio amounts are expressed at Book Value; Book Value includes the amortized cost of the transferred securities at the time they were transferred.   At 03/31/11: After-tax Unrealized MTM Gain/(Loss) includes after-tax unrealized loss on securities available for sale of $(193)M, after-tax unrealized gain on securities held to maturity of $243M and after-tax unrealized loss primarily related to securities transferred from available for sale to held to maturity of $(402)M. Ratings  Investment  AAA AA  A BBB <BBB Not Rated Book Value ($B) Book Value (% Total) Unrealized After-tax MTM Gain/(Loss) ($M) # CUSIPS Government/Agency securities Asset-backed securities Mortgage-backed securities Commercial mortgage-backed securities Corporate bonds Municipal bonds Clipper tax-exempt bonds/other TOTAL PORTFOLIO 96% — 4% — — 10.7 10.3 11 458    81% 9% 6% 2% 2% 48.3 46.5 (531) 1,063 96% — — 1% 3% — 29.4 28.3 102 1,625 78%  6% 4% — — 4.2 4.0 22 158 4%16% 49%  31% — — 3.7 3.6 74 226 12%  68% 14% 4% —  2% 3.7 3.6 55 5,930 33% 63% 1% — — 3% 3.9 3.7 (85) 425 80% 10% 6%  2%  2% 0% 103.9  100.0 (352)(1) 9,885

6  Investment Portfolio  ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES HOLDINGS (PERIOD END 03/31/11)  Portfolio amounts are expressed at Book Value; Book Value includes the amortized cost of the transferred securities at the time they were transferred. RMBS = Residential Mortgage Backed Securities; CLO = Collateralized Loan Obligation; HELOC = Home Equity Line of Credit Ratings Investment AAA AA A BBB <BBB Not Rated Book Value ($B) Book Value (% Total) Unrealized After-tax MTM Gain/(Loss) ($M) # CUSIPS Student Loans Credit Cards Auto/Equipment Foreign RMBS CLOs Sub-Prime HELOC Other TOTAL ABS 89% 7% 3% 1% — — 16.5 34.2 (313) 257 98% — 1% 1% — — 9.7 20.1 25 127 97% — 2% — 1% — 2.3 4.8 1 56 83% 6% 10% 1% — — 14.5 30.0 (93) 294 34% 56% 10% — — — 2.3 4.8 71 72 7% 26% 13% 12% 42% —  2.1 4.3 (199) 215 — 15% — — 85% — 0.1 0.2 (22) 11 — 23%  47% 27%  3% — 0.8 1.6 (1) 31 81% 9% 6% 2% 2% — 48.3 100.0 (531) 1,063

7  Investment Portfolio  ASSET- BACKED SECURITIES COLLATERALIZED BY SUB-PRIME FIRST- LIEN MORTGAGES (AT PERIOD END)  (1)  Securities/municipals and corporate issuers added to negative credit watch within the respective quarter, excluding downgrades.Securities/municipals and corporate Issuers downgraded in respective quarter.Previously discounted or impaired.  Portfolio amounts are expressed at Book Value; Book Value includes the amortized cost of the transferred securities at the time they were transferred. Q4 ’09 Q1 ’10  Q2 ’10 Q3 ’10 Q4 ’10 Q1 ’11 Q1 ‘11 Asset Value  Size of portfolio Ratings Credit enhancement  Unrealized MTM  After-tax Gain/(Loss)  Credit watch(1)  Downgrades(2)  Defaults  $5.1B $4.8B $4.6B $4.5B $2.2B $2.1B — 12% AAA  11% AAA 9% AAA  9% AAA 15% AAA 7% AAA 27% AA, 26% AA,  19% AA,  14% AA, 26% AA,  26% AA, 11% A 11% A 11% A 13% A 4% BBB, 3% BBB, 8% BBB, 8% A 6% BBB,  13% A 44% <BBB 48% <BBB 58% <BBB 12% BBB,  38% <BBB 42% <BBB 4% BBB, 65% <BBB 40.9% 41.2% 41.1% 41.0% 53.2% 53.0% — $(1,141)M $(987)M  $(924)M $(811)M $(207)M $(199)M — 1 205 72  11  1 10 $281M 17 43 109 66 1 63 $300M  0 0 2(3) 6(3) 0 0 $0M

8 Investment Portfolio STRESS COVERAGE: ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES PORTFOLIO (PERIOD END 03/31/11)  HCL = historic cumulative loss; Avg. CE = average credit enhancement; CRE= Commercial Real Estate; SFL = STT’s stressed future losses; Coverage = Avg. CE/SFL See Appendix for additional information.  Govt. student loans: $15.6B Private student loans: $0.9B Credit Cards: $9.7B Auto/Equipment: $2.3B Foreign RMBS: $14.5B CLO/CREs: $2.3B Sub-prime: $2.1B HELOC: $0.1B HCL: < 0.2% Avg. CE: >100% - 97% govt. guarantee + 7.83% CE SFL: 12% - Historic default rate before government guarantees with 0% recoveries With >100% Avg. CE, evaluated as no risk of loss HCL: 6.84% - With insurance Avg. CE: 16.70%  SFL: 13.7% - Assumes no insurance; industry/rating agency assumption Coverage: 1.2x HCL: 6.74% - Wgtd. avg. charge-offs Avg. CE: 31.02% SFL: 12.43% - Industry projected wgtd. avg. charge-offs Coverage: 2.49x HCL: 0.46% - Excluding wrapped deals Avg. CE: 17.82% - Excluding wrapped deals   SFL: 1.76% - Using worst vintage in 10 years (2001) blended by portfolio weighting, excluding wrapped deals Coverage: 10.11x HCL: 0.22% Avg. CE: 12.26% SFL: 1.79% - Aggregate regional projection averaged by holdings Coverage: 6.86xHCL: 0.87% - Current Gross Defaults Avg. CE: 31.97% SFL: 9.6% - Historical annual 4% default rate over 4 years with 60% loss severity Coverage: 3.33x HCL: 8.11% Avg. CE: 53.04% (AAA 70.21%, AA 64.85%) SFL: 27.64% - Roll rate analysis average cumulative loss across all vintages Coverage: 2.40x – Gives benefit to bonds carried at a discount HCL: 0% - With insurance Avg. CE: 0.96 % overcollateralization plus monoline insurance SFL: If all monoline wrappers except FSA fail and defaults stay elevated in perpetuity, and we have 20% recoveries, on a present value basis pre-tax loss is = $0M

9  Investment Portfolio  MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES HOLDINGS (PERIOD END 03/31/11) Ratings Investment AAA AA A BBB <BBB Not Rated Book Value ($B) (% Total) Unrealized After-tax MTM Gain/(Loss) ($M) # CUSIPS   Agency MBS Non-Agency MBS CMBS TOTAL MBS 100% — — — — — 26.9 80.1 166 1,398 48% 6% 4% 9% 33% — 2.5 7.4 (64) 227 78% 12%  6%  4% — — 4.2 12.5 22 158 94% 2% 1% 1% 2% — 33.6 100.0 124 1,783

10  Investment Portfolio  STRESS COVERAGE: MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES PORTFOLIO (PERIOD END 03/31/11)  HCL = historic cumulative loss; Avg. CE = average credit enhancement; SFL = STT’s stressed future losses; Coverage = CE/SFL See Appendix for additional information. Agency MBS: $26.9B Non-Agency Prime MBS: $1.5B Alt-A: $1.0B CMBS: $4.2B 100% AAA-backed primarily by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac & Ginnie Mae Securities No losses expected HCL: 0.96% Avg. CE: 7.49% SFL: 5.25% - Roll rate analysis Coverage: 3.35x - Gives benefit to bonds carried at a discount HCL: 3.35% Avg. CE: 17.01% SFL: 14.10% - Roll rate analysis Coverage: 3.03x - Gives benefit to bonds carried at a discount HCL: 1.063% Avg. CE: 24.91% SFL: 8.1% - Highest historic cumulative loss for any single CMBS cohort Coverage: 3.08x

11  Investment Portfolio  APPENDIX

12  Investment Portfolio - Appendix  The following is intended to provide a general overview of the terms, analysis and our monthly surveillance process used in the foregoing slides that discuss State Street Corporation’s (“State Street”) investment portfolio. As a general matter, the preceding slides summarize key performance statistics including credit enhancement and the stress analysis, as determined by State Street for each asset position. It should be noted that slides represent a point in time depiction and that results can fluctuate each month.We place our securities into asset classes using industry standard nomenclature. Some of the asset classes detailed in the slides include government student loans (“Govt. student loans”), private student loans, credit cards, automobile and equipment (“Auto/equipment”), foreign residential mortgage-backed security (“Foreign RMBS”), collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), sub-prime mortgages (“Sub-prime”), Home Equity Line of Credit (“HELOC”), agency mortgage-backed security (“Agency MBS”), non-agency mortgage-backed security, non-alternative A (“Non-Agency MBS, Non-Alt-A”), non-agency mortgage-backed security, alternative A (“Non-Agency MBS, Alt-A”), and commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”).As noted in the slides, State Street’s investment portfolio contains asset-backed securities (“ABS”) and mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”). ABS represent a secured interest in a pool of assets, while MBS represent ownership of an undivided interest in a group of mortgages. In evaluating each asset position for potential stressed future losses (“SFL”), State Street considers a number of factors including historical cumulative loss (“HCL”), average credit enhancement (“Avg. CE”), and State Street’s coverage amount (“Coverage”). The calculation of each of these factors is discussed in detail and with more specificity below.SFL Stressed future losses are State Street’s estimate of potential future losses under a stressed economic scenario. We can not provide a generic calculation applicable across all asset classes as our estimates for each asset class are unique and in many cases are not a calculation, but a figure based upon our subjective assessment of relevant worst case historical performance. In the cases where we calculate a projected loss ourselves we describe the calculation in the slides. As SFL can be based upon historical worst case scenarios, SFL will vary among the asset classes, which we describe in our slides. Certain assumptions made by State Street in estimating SFL for various asset classes are set forth below.  INFORMATION CONCERNING OUR INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO

13 Investment Portfolio - Appendix Government Student Loans:  Based on the average Sallie Mae Non-consolidation FFELP vintages 2001-2006. Private Student Loans:  Based on forecasted private student loan gross default rates of 17.85% with a recovery rate of approximately 48%. Credit Cards:  Based on the average industry projections for peak charge-offs in the current credit cycle. Auto/Equipment:  Based on the worst annual cumulative net loss vintage (2001) going back to 1997 using 65% Barclay’s prime auto index, 34% Barclay’s near prime auto index, and 1% Barclay’s sub prime index, consistent with the split of the portfolio’s prime, near prime, and sub prime auto holdings after backing out deals wrapped by monoline insurers. This calculation is combined with the worst experience of an agency international auto index on a 33% US, 67% non-US weighted basis. Foreign RMBS:  Applied the following assumptions weighted by regional exposureAustralian MBS: 0.0% No losses expected Dutch MBS: 0.5% Based on historical Dutch performance, which in recent years has been 0.05% per annum UK Prime MBS: 2.5% Used a simple average of five worst historical performing vintages, using historical severitiesUK Non-conforming: 7.5% No historical performance available, so used 3X Prime, which is consistent with what we understand rating  agencies use Spanish MBS: 3.5% Used a 2x multiple to the worst performing Spanish RMBS transaction’s cumulative default rate and a historically   conservative recovery rate Italian MBS: 3.0% Used a 2x multiple to the worst performing Italian RMBS transaction’s cumulative default rate and a historically   conservative recovery rate Russian MBS: 8.0% Used a 4x multiple to the worst performing Russian RMBS transaction’s cumulative default rate and a historically   conservative recovery rate Greek MBS: 1.5% Used an additional 2x stress to the worst performing Greek RMBS transaction’s cumulative gross default figure Portuguese MBS: 5.0% Used a 2x multiple to the worst performing Portuguese RMBS transaction’s cumulative default rate and a historically conservative recovery rate CLOs:  Based on Moody’s average issuer-weighted default rate of 4% for B2-rated issuers during 1983-2009 period over assumed WAL of 4 years with 60% loss severity.  According to Moody’s, the highest loss severity rate on 1st lien loans in the 1990-2009 period was 46.6% in 1993.

14 Subprime:  Calculated by applying projected loss assumptions to the remaining pool of mortgages based upon the stage within the delinquency pipeline, (i.e. current to foreclosure), to obtain a projected future gross loss. A 70% severity rate for 2006 and 2007 vintages, a 65% for 2005 vintages, and a 55% severity rate for vintages prior to 2005 was applied to obtain the stressed future net loss.HELOC:  Main assumptions include – 100% loss severity, projected loss rate of current 3-month average loss rate and projected payment rates at current 3-month average payment rates.Agency MBS:  No losses are assumed due to implied (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) or explicit (Ginnie Mae) government guarantee.Non-Agency MBS (Prime):  Calculated by applying projected loss assumptions to the remaining pool of mortgages based upon the stage within the delinquency pipeline, (i.e. current to foreclosure), to obtain a projected future gross loss. An interpolated severity based on current Loan to Value (LTV) and a future negative Home Price Appreciation (HPA) assumption. Non-Agency MBS (Alt-A):  Calculated by applying projected loss assumptions to the remaining pool of mortgages based upon the stage within the delinquency pipeline, (i.e. current to foreclosure), to obtain a projected future gross loss. An interpolated severity based on current LTV and a future negative HPA assumption. CMBS:  Calculated by applying the highest cumulative loss experienced by any cohort vintage (1986) over the time period 1972-2002 as reported in Commercial Mortgage Defaults: 30 Years of History by Howard Esaki and Masumi Goldman, as it appeared in the Winter 2005 issue of CMBS World magazine. Investment Portfolio - Appendix

15 Investment Portfolio - Appendix HCL Historical cumulative loss is determined by State Street based upon data obtained from third party providers. Avg. CE Credit enhancement is determined by State Street based upon data obtained from third party providers. CE can include excess spread for the most recent year, over-collateralization, cash reserves, and subordination. Coverage Coverage is calculated by dividing CE by SFL, which results in the coverage multiple.  Coverage is provided as a measure of excess enhancement above our projected future losses under a stressed economic scenario.  For subprime, non-agency prime MBS, and Alt-A, coverage is calculated by dividing the break even loss value by SFL.  The break even loss is calculated by a third party provider.  It represents  the loss value a bond can withstand before experiencing a principal loss after giving benefit to all credit enhancement, both structural and excess spread, as well as any discount to the carrying value of the bond (eg. due to purchase discount or impairment). As noted above and in the slides, in performing these calculations we collect and use information provided by third party providers. The information we used to create these slides included information from the latest surveillance reports that included data from servicer reports received during the most recent month. Third party sources use assumptions, judgments and estimates in determining data, and different third parties may provide different data. It should be noted that certain securities report on a quarterly vs. monthly basis. For those securities, the most recent available information was used. It should be noted that industry information, rather than portfolio experience was used in certain instances where industry information resulted in a more conservative approach. State Street does not independently verify the data obtained from third party providers that is used in determining and estimating SFL, HCL, Avg. CE and Coverage and the information is subject to the risk of inaccuracy. As noted above and in the slides, State Street’s estimates are based upon various subjective assumptions, and there is no assurance that these assumptions accurately predict maximum potential or likely future losses.