Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes [X] No [  ]

On November 2, 2010, there were 1,973,880 outstanding shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $.001 per share.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- 2 -

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item1. Financial Statements

Hydrodynex, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

September 31, 2010 and 2009

Index to Financial Statements

- 3 -

- 4 -

- 5 -

- 6 -

- 7 -

Hydrodynex, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

September 30, 2010 and 2009

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS

Hydrodynex, Inc. (a development stage company) (“Hydrodynex” or the “Company”) was incorporated on May 12, 2006 under the laws of the State of Nevada for the purpose of the marketing and distribution of AO-System (Anodic Oxidation) water treatment units under an exclusive license agreement for the Territory of North America Comprising United States, Canada and Mexico.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.  Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.  These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 and notes thereto contained in the information as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on October 13, 2010.

Reclassification

Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.   These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.

Development stage company

The Company is a development stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  The Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and its planned principal operations have not commenced.  All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the estimated useful life of office equipment and the future manufacturing of AO-System by the Company to recover prepaid patent costs and deferred license fees.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fiscal year

The Company elected June 30 as its fiscal year ending date upon formation.

Cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Office equipment

- 8 -

Office equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of office equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful life of five (5) years.  Upon sale or retirement of office equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.

Prepaid patent application costs

The Company has adopted the guidelines as set out in paragraph 350-30-25-3 and paragraph 350-30-35-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for prepaid patent application costs.  Under the requirements as set out in paragraph 350-30-25-3 and paragraph 350-30-35-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company capitalizes and amortizes patent application costs associated with the licensed product the Company intends to sell pursuant to the Exclusive License Agreement, entered into on September 3, 2007, over their remaining legal lives, estimated useful lives, or the term of the contract, whichever is shorter.  All internally developed process costs incurred to the point when a patent application is to be filed are expensed as incurred and classified as research and development costs.  Patent application costs, generally legal costs, thereafter incurred, are capitalized pending disposition of the individual patent application, and are subsequently either amortized based on the initial patent life granted, generally fifteen (15) to twenty (20) years for domestic patents and five (5) to twenty (20) years for foreign patents, or expensed if the patent application is rejected.  The costs of defending and maintaining patents are expensed as incurred.  Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Company follows paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets.  The Company’s long-lived assets, which include office equipment and prepaid patent application costs for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts.  Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.  Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable.  If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated or amortized over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.  The Company determined that there were no impairments of long-lived assets as of September 30, 2010.  

Fair value of financial instruments

The Company applies paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to measure the fair value of its financial instruments.  Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels.  The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at September 30, 2010 or 2009, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized

- 9 -

gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the interim period ended September 30, 2010 or 2009 or for the period from May 12, 2006 (inception) through September 30, 2010.

Revenue recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned less estimated future doubtful accounts.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company will derive its revenue from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated upon the shipment of goods upon the Company commencing operations.  Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via invoice, product delivery is evidenced by warehouse shipping log as well as a signed bill of lading from the trucking company or third party carrier and title transfers upon shipment, based on free on board (“FOB”) warehouse; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the purchase order and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive.

Foreign currency transactions

The Company applies the guidelines as set out in Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Section 830-20-35) for foreign currency transactions.  Pursuant to Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, foreign currency transactions are transactions denominated in a currency other than U.S. Dollar, the Company’s functional currency.  Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid.  A change in exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or decreases the expected amount of functional currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction.  That increase or decrease in expected functional currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction gain or loss that generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the exchange rate changes. Likewise, a transaction gain or loss (measured from the transaction date or the most recent intervening balance sheet date, whichever is later) realized upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the transaction is settled.  The exceptions to this requirement for inclusion in net income of transaction gains and losses pertain to certain intercompany transactions and to transactions that are designated as, and effective as, economic hedges of net investments and foreign currency commitments.  Pursuant to Section 830-20-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the following shall apply to all foreign currency transactions of an enterprise and its investees: (a) At the date the transaction is recognized, each asset, liability, revenue, expense, gain, or loss arising from the transaction shall be measured and recorded in the functional currency of the recording entity by use of the exchange rate in effect at that date as defined in section 830-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; and (b) At each balance sheet date, recorded balances that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the recording entity shall be adjusted to reflect the current exchange rate.

Stock-based compensation for obtaining employee services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of section 505-50-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

- 10 -

The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of section 505-50-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC Section 505-50-30”).  Pursuant to FASB ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under paragraph 710-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”).  Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.  The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

Commitments and contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies.  Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

Net income (loss) per common share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to paragraph of 260-10-45-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options and warrants.

The following table shows the weighted-average number of potentially outstanding dilutive shares excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation for the interim period ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 as they were anti-dilutive:

- 11 -

Cash flows reporting

The Company has adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements  

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01 “Equity Topic 505 – Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash”, which clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)).  Those distributions should be accounted for and included in EPS calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25- 14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards codification.  The amendments in this Update also provide a technical correction to the Accounting Standards Codification.  The correction moves guidance that was previously included in the Overview and Background Section to the definition of a stock dividend in the Master Glossary.  That guidance indicates that a stock dividend takes nothing from the property of the corporation and adds nothing to the interests of the stockholders.  It also indicates that the proportional interest of each shareholder remains the same, and is a key factor to consider in determining whether a distribution is a stock dividend.

In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-02 “Consolidation Topic 810 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 810-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to clarify that the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions of the Subtopic and related guidance applies to the following:

1.

A subsidiary or group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity

2.

A subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture

3.

An exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for a noncontrolling interest in an entity (including an equity method investee or joint venture).

The amendments in this Update also clarify that the decrease in ownership guidance in Subtopic 810-10 does not apply to the following transactions even if they involve businesses:

1.

Sales of in substance real estate.  Entities should apply the sale of real estate guidance in Subtopics 360-20 (Property, Plant, and Equipment) and 976-605 (Retail/Land) to such transactions.

- 12 -

2.

Conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights.  Entities should apply the mineral property conveyance and related transactions guidance in Subtopic 932-360 (Oil and Gas-Property, Plant, and Equipment) to such transactions.

If a decrease in ownership occurs in a subsidiary that is not a business or nonprofit activity, an entity first needs to consider whether the substance of the transaction causing the decrease in ownership is addressed in other U.S. GAAP, such as transfers of financial assets, revenue recognition, exchanges of nonmonetary assets, sales of in substance real estate, or conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights, and apply that guidance as applicable. If no other guidance exists, an entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 810-10.

In February 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-09 “Subsequent Events (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 855-10 as follows:

1.

An entity that either (a) is an SEC filer or(b) is a conduit bond obligor for conduit debt securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local or regional markets) is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. If an entity meets neither of those criteria, then it should evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are available to be issued.

2.

An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC's requirements.

3.

The scope of the reissuance disclosure requirements is refined to include revised financial statements only. The term revised financial statements is added to the glossary of Topic 855. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised either as a result of correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

All of the amendments in this Update are effective upon issuance of the final Update, except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors. That amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010.

In April 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-17 “Revenue Recognition — Milestone Method (Topic 605) Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition”, which provides guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate. A vendor can recognize consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone meets all criteria to be considered substantive.

Determining whether a milestone is substantive is a matter of judgment made at the inception of the arrangement. The following criteria must be met for a milestone to be considered substantive. The consideration earned by achieving the milestone should:

1.

Be commensurate with either of the following:

a.

The vendor's performance to achieve the milestone

b.

The enhancement of the value of the item delivered as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the vendor's performance to achieve the milestone

2.

Relate solely to past performance

3.

Be reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement.

A milestone should be considered substantive in its entirety. An individual milestone may not be bifurcated. An arrangement may include more than one milestone, and each milestone should be evaluated separately to determine whether the milestone is substantive. Accordingly, an arrangement may contain both substantive and nonsubstantive milestones.

A vendor's decision to use the milestone method of revenue recognition for transactions within the scope of the amendments in this Update is a policy election. Other proportional revenue recognition methods also may be applied as long as the application of those other methods does not result in the recognition of consideration in its entirety in the period the milestone is achieved.

A vendor that is affected by the amendments in this Update is required to provide all of the following disclosures:

1.

A description of the overall arrangement

2.

A description of each milestone and related contingent consideration

3.

A determination of whether each milestone is considered substantive

4.

The factors that the entity considered in determining whether the milestone or milestones are substantive

5.

The amount of consideration recognized during the period for the milestone or milestones.

The amendments in this Update are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If a vendor elects early adoption and the

- 13 -

period of adoption is not the beginning of the entity's fiscal year, the entity should apply the amendments retrospectively from the beginning of the year of adoption. Additionally, a vendor electing early adoption should disclose the following information at a minimum for all previously reported interim periods in the fiscal year of adoption:

1.

Revenue

2.

Income before income taxes

3.

Net income

4.

Earnings per share

5.

The effect of the change for the captions presented.

A vendor may elect, but is not required, to adopt the amendments in this Update retrospectively for all prior periods. Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $299,604 at September 30, 2010 and had a net loss of $6,984 and net cash used in operating activities of $90 for the interim period then ended, respectively, with no revenues earned since inception.

While the Company is attempting to commence operations and generate revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be significant enough to support the Company’s daily operations.  Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.  Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 4 – OFFICE EQUIPMENT

Office equipment, stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation at September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 consisted of the following:

Depreciation expense for the periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $65 each period.

NOTE 5 – EXCLUSIVE TECHNOLOGY LICENSE

On September 3, 2007 (“Effective Date”), the Company acquired an exclusive technology license (“Agreement”) for the Territory of North America, comprising Canada, the United States and Mexico to manufacture or assemble and market the AO-System water treatment system (AO – Anodic Oxidation) from Hydrosystemtechnik, GmbH (“Grantor”), a German corporation.  The Company has agreed to pay a licensing fee as follows: (i) €10,000 (equivalent to $13,635 at September 3, 2007) within 120 days of the  Effective Date; (ii) €20,000 (equivalent to $27,270 at September 3, 2007) on November 30, 2008; and (iii) €20,000 (equivalent to $27,270 at September 3, 2007) upon AO-System being certified and approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) for selling on a commercial basis in the United States, or €50,000 (equivalent to $68,175 at September 3, 2007) in aggregate, all of which are non-refundable and may be recouped from the future Product Royalty in perpetuity at ten percent (10%) of the Net Selling Price on all AO water treatment systems assembled or manufactured by the Company or a subcontract manufacture utilized by the Company and paid for by customers of the Company due and payable quarterly within 30 days from the

- 14 -

last day of the quarter provided the Company exercises its right to manufacture or assemble AO-Systems.  In the event the Company does not manufacture or assemble AO-Systems, the Company pays no royalty on finished units purchased from GRANTOR and resold to customers of the Company, the license fees will no longer be considered prepaid royalties   and the Company will amortize prepaid royalties over the remaining legal life of the patent of AO System, or estimated useful life, or the term of the contract, whichever is shorter in the event that the Company decides not to manufacture or assemble AO-System.

The Company’s exclusive license right to sell finished AO Units in the territory is contingent upon the Company achieving minimum annual sales volume as defined in Table 1 of Appendix B of this Agreement among other terms and conditions at the end of each business year, beginning with the third (3^rd) anniversary after the effective date of this Agreement.  In the event the objectives defined in years three (3) through five (5) of Table 1 in Appendix B are not attained at the end of each business year, this agreement shall, at the option of the GRANTOR, automatically revert to a non-exclusive marketing agreement and the Company will no longer have the right in manufacturing or assembling of AO Systems.

The Company determined that the (iii) payment required under the exclusive license agreement upon approval of U.S. EPA is a contractual liability instead of contingent liability as the AO system has been certified and approved by the European Union for selling on a commercial basis in Europe and the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s certification and approval for selling on a commercial basis in the United States is a matter of procedure and recorded deferred license fees and related license fees payable of $68,175, €50,000 measured in U.S. Dollar at September 3, 2007, the transaction date upon signing of the Exclusive License Agreement.

The Company paid the first installment of €10,000 with $14,892 on December 17, 2007 and the second installment of €20,000 due on November 30, 2008 and paid $26,486 on January 26, 2009, respectively.  The due date for the third installment of €20,000 is undeterminable pending EPA approval.

The Company determined that since they are currently unable to secure EPA approval of the AO-System in order to begin selling in the United States within the time period specified in the agreement, the agreement has reverted to a non-exclusive marketing agreement.  Consequently, the Company has completely impaired the $68,175 value of the Deferred Licensing Fee at June 30, 2010.  

NOTE 6 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Issuance of common stock

The Company was incorporated on May 12, 2006.  In May 2006, 200,000 shares of its common stock were sold to the Company’s founder and President at $0.01 per share for $2,000 in cash.

During fiscal year 2007, the Company sold 300,000 shares of its common stock to the Company’s founder and President at $0.01 per share for $3,000 in cash.

During fiscal year 2008, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of its common stock at $0.10 per share for $100,000 in cash.

On November 25, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a Regulation D, Rule 504 stock sale and entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $7,500 of its securities through the sale of 15,000 shares of its common stock at $0.50 per share inclusive of a stock warrant to purchase 15,000 shares of its common stock exercisable at $1.00 expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance with Ryan Edington, the brother of Jerod Edington, the Vice-president and Chief Operating Officer of the Company.  The fair value of these warrants granted, estimated on the date of grant, was $3,300, which has been recorded as additional paid-in capital, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

On January 23, 2009, the Company sold 250,000 shares of its common stock at $0.20 per share to Ron Kunisaki, the president of the company, for $50,000 in cash.

On July 25, 2009, pursuant to the Bridge Loan Agreement entered into by Triax Capital Management and Hydrodynex, Inc., dated July 24, 2008, Triax Capital Management exercised the conversion rights of the promissory note at the agreed rate of $0.25 per share. The original loan to the Company was in the amount of $4,000, and the 365 days of interest at 8% per annum of $320, equates to a conversion value of 17,280 shares.

- 15 -

On August 23, 2009, pursuant to the Bridge Loan Agreement entered into by Kyle Drexel and Hydrodynex, Inc., dated August 22, 2008, Mr. Drexel exercised the conversion rights of the promissory note at the agreed rate of $0.25 per share. The original loan to the Company was in the amount of $5,000, and the 365 days of interest at 8% per annum of $400, equates to a conversion value of 21,600 shares.

On September 26, 2009, the Company sold 30,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share for $7,500 in cash.

On November 9, 2009, the Company sold 140,000 shares of common stock at $0.25 per share for $35,000 in cash.

Stock option plan

On May 19, 2006, the Company’s board of directors approved the adoption of the “2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan” (“2006 Plan”) by unanimous consent.  The 2006 Plan was initiated to encourage and enable officers, directors, consultants, advisors and key employees of the Company to acquire and retain a proprietary interest in the Company by ownership of its common stock.  A total of 1,000,000 of the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock may be subject to, or issued pursuant to, the terms of the plan.  The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.  Additionally, the Company’s policy is to issue new shares of common stock to satisfy stock option exercises.

On June 30, 2008, the Board of Director of the Company approved and granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of 85,000 shares of its common stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) at $0.25 per share expiring on June 30, 2013, five (5) years from the date of issuance, vested upon issuance.

On November 21, 2008, an officer and director of the Company resigned and surrendered his outstanding stock option to purchase 15,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company.

The fair value of each option grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

The fair value of the stock options issued in June 2008 under the 2006 Plan using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model was $4,250 at the date of grant, all of which have being recognized as stock based compensation and so included in the statements of operations upon issuance.

For the interim period ended September 30, 2010, the Company did not grant any stock options nor record any stock-based compensation.

The table below summarizes the Company’s stock option activity through September 30, 2010:

- 16 -