Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.2 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION BY THE CORPORATION'S CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - MAXSYS HOLDINGS, INC. | maxsys10q20100331ex31-2.htm |
EX-32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CORPORATION'S CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - MAXSYS HOLDINGS, INC. | maxsys10q20100331ex32-1.htm |
EX-32.2 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY THE CORPORATION'S CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER - MAXSYS HOLDINGS, INC. | maxsys10q20100331ex32-2.htm |
EX-31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION BY THE CORPORATION'S CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - MAXSYS HOLDINGS, INC. | maxsys10q20100331ex31-1.htm |
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
[X]
|
Quarterly
Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended: March
31, 2010
Or
[__]
|
Transition
Report Pursuant To Section 13 Or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of
1934
|
For the
transition period from ______________ to _______________
Commission
File Number: 000-53148
MAXSYS
HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
26-0904488
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation of origination)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification Number)
|
22817
Ventura Blvd., Suite #462
Woodland Hills,
California
|
91364
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
code)
|
|
(818)
943-8068
|
||
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [__]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [__] No
[__]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated
filer [ ]
|
Non-accelerated
filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company [X]
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
[ ] No [X]
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each issuer’s classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: 81,960,552 issued and outstanding as of May 19,
2010.
Transitional
Small Business Disclosure Form (Check one): Yes [ ] No
[X]
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
TO
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
PART
I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
Page
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements (unaudited)
|
2 |
Balance
Sheets as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31,
2009
|
2 | |
Statements
of Operations for the three months ended March 2010 (unaudited) and 2009
and from inception to March 31, 2010 (unaudited)
|
3 | |
Statements
of Stockholders’ Deficit (unaudited)
|
4 | |
Statements
of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and
2009 and from inception to March 31, 2010 (unaudited)
|
5 | |
Notes
to the Financial Statements
|
6 | |
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
11 |
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
13 |
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
13 |
PART
II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
14 |
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
15 |
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
15 |
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
15 |
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
15 |
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
15 |
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
15 |
Signatures
|
16 |
1
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Maxsys
Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly
known as Tai Pan Holding, Inc. and Unicapital Acquisition Corp.)
(A
Development Stage Company)
Balance
Sheets
March
31,
|
|||||||||
2010
|
December
31,
|
||||||||
(unaudited)
|
2009
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||||
Current
assets
|
|||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 4,975 | $ | 23,966 | |||||
Accounts
receivable
|
331 | 331 | |||||||
Other
receivables
|
800 | 850 | |||||||
Total
current assets
|
6,106 | 25,147 | |||||||
Property
and equipment - net
|
28,594 | 31,477 | |||||||
Other
assets
|
5,445 | 4,200 | |||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 40,145 | $ | 60,824 | |||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
|||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 700 | $ | 700 | |||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
173,750 | 171,380 | |||||||
Note
payable to related party
|
122,919 | 117,733 | |||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
297,369 | 289,813 | |||||||
Stockholders'
deficit
|
|||||||||
Preferred
stock: $0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares
|
|||||||||
authorized;
none issued
|
- | - | |||||||
Common stock: $0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares
|
|||||||||
authorized;
82,260,552 and 78,000,000 issued in
|
|||||||||
2009
and 2008, respectively
|
822,606 | 822,606 | |||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
521,044 | 521,044 | |||||||
Retained
earnings deficit
|
(1,600,874 | ) | (1,572,639 | ) | |||||
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
(257,224 | ) | (228,989 | ) | |||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
$ | 40,145 | $ | 60,824 |
See notes
to the financial statements.
2
Maxsys
Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly
known as Tai Pan Holding, Inc. and Unicapital Acquisition Corp.)
(A
Development Stage Company)
Statements
of Operations
(Unaudited)
Period
from
|
||||||||||||
Three
months ended
|
September
5, 2007
|
|||||||||||
March
31,
|
(inception)
to
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
March
31, 2010
|
||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | - | $ | 123,058 | $ | 340,705 | ||||||
Cost
of sales
|
- | 115,542 | 287,342 | |||||||||
Gross
profit
|
- | 7,516 | 53,363 | |||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
- | 18,032 | 158,592 | |||||||||
Research
and development
|
- | - | 337,489 | |||||||||
General
and administrative
|
26,616 | 183,168 | 1,139,303 | |||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
26,616 | 201,200 | 1,635,384 | |||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(26,616 | ) | (193,684 | ) | (1,582,021 | ) | ||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
1 | 1,252 | 13,678 | |||||||||
Finance
charges
|
(1,441 | ) | (3,318 | ) | (23,704 | ) | ||||||
Franchise
Taxes
|
- | (904 | ) | (3,291 | ) | |||||||
Miscellaneous
income
|
- | (2,890 | ) | 791 | ||||||||
Miscellaneous
expenses
|
(179 | ) | - | (6,327 | ) | |||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (28,235 | ) | $ | (199,544 | ) | $ | (1,600,874 | ) | |||
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
* | * | ||||||||||
Basic
and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
82,260,552 | 80,000,000 |
* Less
than $0.01.
See notes
to the financial statements.
3
Maxsys
Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly
known as Tai Pan Holding, Inc. and Unicapital Acquisition Corp.)
(A
Development Stage Company)
Statements
of Stockholders’ Deficit
(Unaudited)
Additional
|
Retained
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
paid-in
|
earnings
|
stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
capital
|
deficit
|
deficit
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 5, 2007
|
- | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||
Issuance
of stock for cash at $0.01
|
||||||||||||||||||||
per
share in September 2007
|
75,000,000 | 750,000 | - | - | 750,000 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (126,101 | ) | (126,101 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
75,000,000 | $ | 750,000 | $ | - | $ | (126,101 | ) | $ | 623,899 | ||||||||||
Issuance
of stock for cash at $0.0125
|
||||||||||||||||||||
per
share in December 2008
|
3,000,000 | 30,000 | 7,500 | - | 37,500 | |||||||||||||||
Recognition
of stock based compensation
|
- | - | 375,000 | - | 375,000 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (1,071,206 | ) | (1,071,206 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
78,000,000 | $ | 780,000 | $ | 382,500 | $ | (1,197,307 | ) | $ | (34,807 | ) | |||||||||
Issuance
of stock for cash at $0.025
|
||||||||||||||||||||
per
share in January 2009
|
3,000,000 | 30,000 | 45,000 | - | 75,000 | |||||||||||||||
Recognition
of stock based compensation
|
- | - | 75,000 | - | 75,000 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance
of stock for cash at $0.0225
|
||||||||||||||||||||
per
share in September 2009
|
888,889 | 8,889 | 11,111 | 20,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of stock for cash at $0.03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
per
share in October 2009
|
71,663 | 717 | 1,433 | 2,150 | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of stock for cash at $0.03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
per
share in December 2009
|
300,000 | 3,000 | 6,000 | 9,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (375,332 | ) | (375,332 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2009
|
82,260,552 | $ | 822,606 | $ | 521,044 | $ | (1,572,639 | ) | $ | (228,989 | ) | |||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (28,235 | ) | (28,235 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2010
|
82,260,552 | $ | 822,606 | $ | 521,044 | $ | (1,600,874 | ) | $ | (257,224 | ) |
See notes
to the financial statements.
4
Maxsys
Holdings, Inc.
(Formerly
known as Tai Pan Holding, Inc. and Unicapital Acquisition Corp.)
(A
Development Stage Company)
Statements
of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Period
from
|
||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
September
5, 2007
|
|||||||||||
March
31,
|
(Inception)
to
|
|||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
March
31, 2010
|
||||||||||
Operating
activities
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (28,235 | ) | $ | (199,544 | ) | $ | (1,600,874 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
||||||||||||
used
in operating activities
|
||||||||||||
Loss
on sale of fixed assets
|
- | - | 4,511 | |||||||||
Depreciation
|
2,883 | 5,717 | 64,462 | |||||||||
Non-cash
stock based compensation
|
- | 75,000 | 450,000 | |||||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
- | (8,356 | ) | (331 | ) | |||||||
Other
receivables
|
50 | 29,548 | (800 | ) | ||||||||
Inventories
|
- | 80,727 | - | |||||||||
Other
asssets
|
(1,245 | ) | 302,614 | (5,445 | ) | |||||||
Accounts
payable
|
- | 555 | 700 | |||||||||
Other
current liabilities
|
- | (27,320 | ) | - | ||||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
2,370 | (13,104 | ) | 173,750 | ||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(24,177 | ) | 245,837 | (914,027 | ) | |||||||
Investing
activities
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
- | 2,872 | 6,809 | |||||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
- | - | (104,376 | ) | ||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
- | 2,872 | (97,567 | ) | ||||||||
Financing
activities
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from (payment of) line of credit
|
- | (299,940 | ) | - | ||||||||
Proceeds
from issuance (payment of) of note payable
|
5,186 | (38,610 | ) | 122,919 | ||||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
- | 75,000 | 893,650 | |||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
5,186 | (263,550 | ) | 1,016,569 | ||||||||
Net
change in cash
|
(18,991 | ) | (14,841 | ) | 4,975 | |||||||
Cash,
beginning of period
|
23,966 | 27,932 | - | |||||||||
Cash,
end of period
|
$ | 4,975 | $ | 13,091 | $ | 4,975 | ||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information
|
||||||||||||
Cash
paid for:
|
||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 1,441 | $ | 2,946 | $ | 23,704 |
See notes
to the financial statements.
5
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Maxsys
Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as Tai Pan Holding, Inc. and Unicapital
Acquisition Corp.) (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on
January 11, 2008. The Company is a distributor and retailer of ATSC
digital converter box.
The
accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared by the Company in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America for the preparation of interim financial information and the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments)
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Management
is required to make certain estimates and assumptions which affect the amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses reported. Actual results
could differ materially from these estimates and assumptions.
MERGER AND ACQUISITION
On
January 2, 2009, William Tay, the majority shareholder of the Company entered
into a Share Purchase Agreement with Tai Pan Holding, Inc. (“Tai Pan”), a
Delaware corporation incorporated on September 5, 2007 under the name “Gridlink
Technologies, Inc.” On January 18, 2009, pursuant to such agreement, Mr. Tay
sold all 31,340,000 common shares of the Company held by him to Tai Pan for
$39,950 in consideration.
On March
11, 2009, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Tai Pan.
On March 16, 2009, pursuant to this agreement, Tai Pan merged with and into the
Company, whereupon the separate existence of Tai Pan ceased and the Company was
the surviving entity. Concurrently, the Company cancelled the common shares
acquired from Mr. Tay. In connection therewith, on March 25, 2009, the Company
changed its name from “Unicapital Acquisition Corp.” to “Tai Pan Holding,
Inc.”
The
merger transaction has been accounted for as a reverse merger, with the Company
as the legal acquirer and Tai Pan as the accounting acquirer. Prior to the
merger with Tai Pan, the Company was a shell company with no operations and no
net assets.
On
September 3, 2009 the Company changed its name to Maxsys Holdings, Inc.
Consequently, the financial information presented herein is that of Maxsys
Holdings, Inc.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Managements’
Plan
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred losses from
operations and has negative cash flows from operating activities since its
inception. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the Company had $4,975 and
$23,966, respectively in unrestricted cash. The Company requires funding to
maintain working capital to meet its growth plans until such time revenues are
sufficient to meets its anticipated cost structure. These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plans are to obtain additional funding through an offering of
common stock. There are no
assurances
that management will be successful in its plans. The accompanying financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
the uncertainty.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts
of revenue and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could
materially differ from those estimates.
6
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
For
purpose of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid
debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to
be cash equivalents.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenues when the earnings process is complete, evidenced by
an agreement between the Company and the customer, there has been delivery and
acceptance, collectability is probable, and pricing is fixed and determinable.
Revenue from service agreements is generally recognized ratably over the service
period or as the service is rendered. Allowances are established for anticipated
product returns, price protection, cooperative marketing, and sales incentive
programs.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by using the
first-in first-out method.
Research
and Development
Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred. The costs of materials and
equipment that will be acquired or constructed for research and development
activities, and that have alternative future uses, both in research and
development, marketing or sales, will be classified as property and equipment
and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board ("FASB") Statement No. 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes." SFAS
No. 109 requires the Company to provide a net deferred tax asset/liability equal
to the expected future tax benefit/expense of temporary reporting differences
between book and tax accounting methods and any available operating loss or tax
credit carry forwards. A valuation allowance is established to offset the
deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not, that such tax assets will
not be recovered.
Loss
per Common Share
The
Company presents basic loss per share ("EPS") and diluted EPS on the face of the
statement of operations. Basic loss per share is computed as net loss divided by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable
through stock options, warrants, and other convertible securities.
Risk and Uncertainties
The
Company's operations are subject to new innovations in product design and
function. Significant technical changes can have an adverse effect on product
lives. Design and development of new products are important elements to achieve
and maintain profitability in the Company's industry segment.
The
Company may be subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and
regulations. The Company does not anticipate expenditures to comply with such
laws and does not believe that regulations will have a material impact on the
Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company
believes that its operations comply, in all material respects, with applicable
federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations.
Concentrations
of Risk
The
Company, at times, maintains cash balances at certain financial institutions in
excess of amounts insured by federal agencies. The Company’s sale and packaging
of its product and other related services in 2008 and beginning of 2009 were
concentrated solely with a third party, as disclosed in Note 9(a). The loss of
this third party could have a material effect on the Company. The Company will
explore opportunities with other third parties as it continues to expand its
business.
7
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. The provision
for depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets ranging from three (3) to seven (7) years.
Significant renewals and betterments are capitalized while maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Leasehold improvements are amortized
on the straight-line basis over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or
the term of the related lease.
The
Company reviews its property and equipment for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by
a comparison of the
carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted operating cash flows
expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the
carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Long-lived
assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair
value less costs to sell.
Stock-Based
Compensation
At
inception, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based
Payment" ("SFAS 123R"). SFAS 123R requires that the Company account for all
stock-based compensation using a fair-value method and recognize the fair value
of each award as an expense over the service period.
Accounting
for Stock Options Issued to Consultants
The
Company measures compensation expense for its non-employee stock-based
compensation under Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") No. 96-18 "Accounting for
Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in
Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services". The fair value of the option
issued or committed to be issued is used to measure the transaction, as this is
more reliable than the fair value of the services received. The fair value is
measured at the value of the Company's common stock on the date that the
commitment for performance by the counterparty has been reached or the
counterparty's performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instrument
is charged directly to stock-based compensation expense and credited to
additional paid-in capital.
Fair
Value Measurements
On
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 (SFAS 157), Fair Value Measurements which
became effective for the Company. SFAS 157 relates to financial
assets and financial liabilities. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff
Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157, which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an
annual basis, until January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end
entities.
SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP),
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this
standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair
value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions.
FSP FAS 157-1 amends SFAS 157 to exclude from the scope of SFAS 157 certain
leasing transactions accounted for under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 13, “Accounting for Leases.” FSP FAS 157-2 amends SFAS 157 to
defer the effective date of SFAS 157 for all non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value in the financial statements on a recurring basis to fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2008. In addition, effective for the third quarter of 2008,
the Company adopted FASB Staff Position 157-3 “Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP FAS 157-3”).
FSP FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS 157 to financial instruments in
an inactive market. The adoption of SFAS 157 and FSP FAS 157-3 did not have a
material impact on the Company’s financial statements since the Company
generally does not record its financial assets and liabilities in its financial
statements at fair value.
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company also adopted, on a prospective basis, Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items
at fair value. The adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a material impact on the
Company’s financial statements since the Company elected not to apply the fair
value option for any of its eligible financial instruments or other
items.
8
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board
(APB) 28-1, Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The FSP amends
SFAS No. 107 “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” to
require an entity to provide disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments in interim financial information. This FSP is to be applied
prospectively and is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009 with early adoption permitted for periods ending after
March 15, 2009. The adoption of this FSP did not have an impact on the
Company’s financial statements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations, which
became effective January 1, 2009 via prospective application to business
combinations. This Statement requires that the acquisition method of accounting
be applied to a broader set of business combinations, amends the definition of a
business combination, provides a definition of a business, requires an acquirer
to recognize an acquired business at its fair value at the acquisition date and
requires the assets and liabilities assumed in a business combination to be
measured and recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date (with
limited exceptions). The Company adopted this Statement on January 1, 2009.
There was no impact upon adoption, and its effects on future periods will depend
on the nature and significance of business combinations subject to this
statement.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and
Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies. This FSP requires that assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized at
fair value if fair value can be reasonably estimated. If fair value cannot be
reasonably estimated, the asset or liability would generally be recognized in
accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” and FASB
Interpretation No. 14, “Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss”.
Further, the FASB removed the subsequent accounting guidance for assets and
liabilities arising from contingencies from SFAS No. 141(R). The
requirements of this FSP carry forward without significant revision the guidance
on contingencies of SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”, which was
superseded by SFAS No. 141(R) (see previous paragraph). The FSP also
eliminates the requirement to disclose an estimate of the range of possible
outcomes of recognized contingencies at the acquisition date. For unrecognized
contingencies, the FASB requires that entities include only the disclosures
required by SFAS No. 5. This FSP was adopted effective January 1,
2009. There was no impact upon adoption, and its effects on future periods will
depend on the nature and significance of business combinations subject to this
statement.
In May
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” which requires entities
to disclose the date through which they have evaluated subsequent events and
whether the date corresponds with the release of their financial statements. The
statement establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of
events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements
are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim
or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied
prospectively. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have an impact to the
Company’s financial statements.
In June
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” Replaces SFAS
No. 162, establishes the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernmental entities. On the effective date for financial statements issued
for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, the Codification
will supersede all then–existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. The
Company has determined that the adoption of SFAS No. 168 will not have an impact
on the financial statements.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
At March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, property and equipment consisted of the
following:
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
$ | 9,156 | $ | 9,495 | ||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
1,350 | 1,350 | ||||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
15,980 | 16,818 | ||||||
Test
equipment
|
23,357 | 25,379 | ||||||
Software
|
35,391 | 35,391 | ||||||
85,234 | 88,433 | |||||||
Less
accummulated depreciation
|
56,640 | 56,956 | ||||||
$ | 28,594 | $ | 31,477 |
Provisions
for depreciation for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $2,883
and $5,717, respectively.
9
OTHER ASSETS
At March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, other assets consisted of the
following:
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Deposit
|
$ | 5,445 | $ | 4,200 | ||||
$ | 5,445 | $ | 4,200 |
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION
On April
21, 2008, the Company issued a promissory note payable to Tai Pan Capital
Private Limited, an affiliate, amounting to $120,000. The promissory
note bears interest at 6% per annum and is collateralized by the Company’s
inventories and accounts receivable. As of March 31, 2010, the
balance of the promissory note amounted to $76,302.
In April
and June 2009, the Company obtained advances from a director totaling $20,000
(presented in the balance sheet as part of other current liabilities). As of
March 31, 2010, the balance of the promissory note amounted to
$21,201.
During
the year 2009 and beginning of 2010, the Company obtained advances from an
affiliate of the Company, totaling $25,416 (presented in the balance sheet as
part of other current liabilities).
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
During
the period from September 5, 2007 (Inception) to March 31, 2010, the Company
issued 82,260,552 shares of its common stock for a total consideration of
$893,650.
COMMITMENT
AND CONTINGENCIES
a)
Lease
The
Company leases certain facilities under non-cancelable operating leases. The
future minimum annual lease payments at March 31, 2010 are approximately
$88,200. The Company recognized $8,400 of rent expense in 2010.
b)
Litigation
Two of
the Company’s former employees filed a legal action against the Company for
breach of contract for failure to pay severance pay upon their termination from
employment and pursuant to their employment agreements. The Company
accrued this liability as of March 31, 2010. In April 2009, the
Company filed a cross-complaint against the former CEO upon breach of fiduciary
duty, fraud, and negligence in relation to the above legal action, and request
for indemnification. In June 2009, the former CEO filed another cross-complaint
against the Company for wrongful termination and others. The court granted
another continuance to extend the trial day to July 19, 2010 at final status
conference
on July 9, 2009.
INCOME TAXES
As of
March 31, 2009, the Company has available net operating loss (NOL)
carry-forwards that approximate $1,572,639 and may be applied against future
taxable income through tax year 2025. A valuation reserve has been
set up to entirely offset any deferred tax asset since it is more likely than
not that the deferred tax assets will not be
realized.
10
ITEM
2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Forward
Looking Statement Notice
Certain
statements made in this periodic report on Form 10-Q are “forward-looking
statements” (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995) in regard to the plans and objectives of management for future
operations. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements of Tai
Pan Holding, Inc. (“we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company”) to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements
included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks
and uncertainties. The Company's plans and objectives are based, in part, on
assumptions involving the continued expansion of business. Assumptions relating
to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future
economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all
of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are
beyond the control of the Company. Although the Company believes its assumptions
underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions
could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance the
forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report will prove to be
accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the
forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information
should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person
that the objectives and plans of the Company will be achieved.
Overview
Maxsys
Holdings, Inc., Inc. (the “Company”), formerly known as Tai Pan Holding, Inc.
and Unicapital Acquisition Corp., was incorporated in Delaware on January 11,
2008. On March 11, 2009, the Company entered into a merger agreement with Tai
Pan Holding, Inc. (“Tai Pan”), a Delaware corporation, pursuant to which the
Company merged with Tai Pan on March 16, 2009, with the Company as the surviving
entity. We accounted for this merger transaction as a reverse acquisition and
recapitalization and, as a result, our financial statements are in substance
those of Tai Pan, with the assets and liabilities, and revenues and expenses, of
the Company being included effective from the date of the merger transaction.
Please see Note 2 to our unaudited financial statements included in this report
for further details of this transaction. In connection with the merger, the
Company changed its name to “Tai Pan Holding, Inc.” on March 25,
2009.
Prior to
the merger acquisition, Tai Pan was developing high-speed wireless
communications equipment and accessories that enable the transmission of data,
voice, and video with throughput speeds and capacity. In May 2008,
Tai Pan’s management decided to discontinue the development project due to the
lack of the funds and the resignation of its founder/CEO. Instead, Tai Pan
continued its operations as a distributor and retailer of ATSC digital converter
box, a business which the Company continues since the merger transaction. ATSC
digital converter box allows analog televisions to receive digital signals after
analog broadcasting terminates on June 12, 2009.
On
September 3, 2009 the Company decided to change its name to Maxsys Holdings,
Inc. The Company continues to locate and identify suitable business entities for
potential combination with any such entity. The combination will normally take
the form of a merger, stock-for-stock exchange or stock-for- assets exchange. No
assurances can be given, however, that the Company will be successful in
locating or negotiating with any target business.
The
Company has not restricted its search for any specific kind of businesses, and
it may acquire a business which is in its preliminary or development stage,
which is already in operation, or in essentially any stage of its business life.
It is impossible to predict the status of any business in which the Company may
become engaged, in that such business may need to seek additional capital, may
desire to have its shares publicly traded, or may seek other perceived
advantages which the Company may offer. In implementing
a structure for a particular business acquisition, the Company may become a
party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, or licensing
agreement with another corporation or entity. It is anticipated that any
securities issued in any such business combination would be issued in reliance
upon exemption from registration under applicable federal and state securities
laws. In some circumstances, however, as a negotiated element of its
transaction, the Company may agree to register all or a part of such securities
immediately after the transaction is consummated or at specified times
thereafter. If such registration occurs, it will be undertaken by the surviving
entity after the Company has entered into an agreement for a business
combination or has consummated a business combination. The issuance of
additional securities and their potential sale into any trading market which may
develop in the Company's securities may depress the market value of the
Company's securities in the future if such a market develops, of which there is
no assurance.
11
The
Company will participate in a business combination only after the negotiation
and execution of appropriate agreements. Negotiations with a target
company will likely focus on the percentage of the Company which the target
company shareholders would acquire in exchange for their shareholdings. Although
the terms of such agreements cannot be predicted, generally such agreements will
require certain representations and warranties of the parties thereto, will
specify certain events of default, will detail the terms of closing and the
conditions which must be satisfied by the parties prior to and after such
closing and will include miscellaneous other terms. Any merger or
acquisition effected by the Company can be expected to have a significant
dilutive effect on the percentage of shares held by the Company's shareholders
at such time.
There is
presently no trading market for the Company's common stock and no market may
ever exist for the Company's common stock. The Company plans to apply for a
corporate CUSIP number for its common stock and to assist broker-dealers in
complying with Rule 15c2-11 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
so that such brokers can trade the Company's common stock in the Over-
The-Counter Electronic Bulletin Board (the "OTC Bulletin Board"). There can be
no assurance to investors that any broker-dealer will actually file the
materials required in order for such OTC Bulletin Board trading to
proceed.
Accounting
for Business Combination
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations, which
became effective January 1, 2009 via prospective application to business
combinations. This Statement requires that the acquisition method of accounting
be applied to a broader set of business combinations, amends the definition of a
business combination, provides a definition of a business, requires an acquirer
to recognize an acquired business at its fair value at the acquisition date and
requires the assets and liabilities assumed in a business combination to be
measured and recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date (with
limited exceptions). The Company adopted this Statement on January 1, 2009.
There was no impact upon adoption, and its effects on future periods will depend
on the nature and significance of business combinations subject to this
statement.
As a
result of any business combination, if the acquired entity's shareholders will
exercise control over us, the transaction will be deemed to be a capital
transaction where we are treated as a non-business entity. Therefore, the
accounting for the business combination is identical to that resulting from a
reverse merger, except no goodwill or other intangible assets will be recorded.
For accounting purposes, the acquired entity will be treated as the accounting
acquirer and, accordingly, will be presented as the continuing
entity.
Our
principal operations commenced in September 2007. However, to date,
we have had limited revenues. Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No.
7 (“FAS 7”) sets forth guidelines for identifying an enterprise in the
development stage and the standards of financial accounting and reporting
applicable to such an enterprise. In the opinion of management, our activities
from our inception through March 31, 2010 fall within the referenced guidelines.
Accordingly, we report our activities in this report in accordance with FAS
7.
Results
of Operations
The
Company currently ceases its operation and does not have any revenues or
earnings from operations. We will, in all likelihood, sustain
operating expenses without corresponding revenues, at least until the
consummation of a business combination. This may result in the
Company incurring a net operating loss that will increase continuously until the
Company can consummate a business combination with a profitable business
opportunity. There is no assurance that we can identify such a
business opportunity and consummate such a business combination.
We are
dependent upon advances from our officers, directors and affiliates to meet any
minimum costs that may occur. All advances are subject to 6% interest per
annum.
12
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of
March 31, 2010, we had cash of $4,975. Our total current assets were
$6,106 and our total current liabilities were $297,369, which resulted in
negative net working capital of $291,263.
To
provide sufficient funding for our business plan, we will need to raise
approximately $3 million to $4 million of additional capital during fiscal year
of 2010. We expect to achieve this financing goal through public or
private equity offerings. We may raise the capital in more than one transaction
according to the economy and market conditions. However, we have
encountered unexpected difficulties with implementation of our previous business
plans, and there can be no assurance that unexpected difficulties can be avoided
when we carry on our future business plans. This fact alone could
compromise our chances of raising sufficient funds in the foreseeable future. If
we are able to raise the funds, the terms and conditions may be highly dilutive
to our existing stockholders.
As part
of our plan to augment our financial resources and consider attractive business
opportunities, we and our principal stockholders have entered into discussions
with an unaffiliated third party with respect to a potential merger transaction
which could result in change of control/ownership and new management. However,
there can be no assurance that a merger or other significant transaction will be
consummated with the third party or, if consummated, that the Company or its
stockholders would realize any benefits from it.
Contractual
Obligations
As a
"smaller reporting company" as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company
is not required to provide this information.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
The
Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial
condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is
material to investors.
Going
Concern
The
financial statements included with this report have been prepared in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles that contemplate the continuance
of the Company as a going concern. Due to our lack of cash, we are unable pay
all of the costs associated with our operations. Management intends to use
borrowings and sales of securities to mitigate the effects of our cash position;
however, no assurance can be given that debt or equity financing, if and when
required, will be available. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets
and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to
continue existence.
ITEM
3.
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a
"smaller reporting company" as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company
is not required to provide information required by this Item.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed pursuant to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commission's rules, regulations and related forms, and
that such information is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
The
Company's management does not expect that their disclosure controls or their
internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and fraud. A
control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of a control system
are met. Further, any control system reflects limitations on resources, and the
benefits of a control system must be considered relative to its costs. These
limitations also include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or
mistake.
13
Additionally,
controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people or by management override of a control. A design
of a control system is also based upon certain assumptions about potential
future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost- effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be
detected.
As of
March 31, 2010, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
Changes
in Internal Controls
There
have been no changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect these controls and procedures during the quarter ended
March 31, 2010.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
The
following discussion discusses all known or anticipated material legal
proceedings commenced by or against us. Occasionally we may be named
as a party in claims and legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of
our business. These claims and legal proceedings may relate to contractual
rights and obligations, employment matters, or to other matters relating to our
business and operations.
Other
than the matter discussed below, we are not aware of any material pending legal
proceedings involving us.
Shen v. Gridlink Technologies,
Inc. (Superior Court of
California, Country of Los Angeles, Case No. B0394915).
Manling Shen, a former employee of the Company, filed suit against the Company
in the Superior Court of California, Country of Los Angeles, alleging the
Company of breach of the employment contract and failure to provide her with the
severance payment upon the termination of his employment pursuant to the
employment contract.
Liu v. Gridlink Technologies,
Inc. (Superior Court of California, Country of Los Angeles, Case No.
B0397482). Joshua Liu, a former employee of the Company, filed suit
against the Company in the Superior Court of California, Country of Los Angeles,
alleging the Company of breach of the employment contract and failure to provide
him with the severance payment upon the termination of his employment pursuant
to the employment contract.
Although
neither of the above two cases have been decided so far, the Company’s outside
legal counsel suggested that the Company could pay a total of approximately
$100,000 to settle with Manling Shen and Josuha Liu.
Grillink Technologies, Inc. a
Delaware corporation, Cross-Complainant, vs Jay Wang, an individual
(Superior Court of California, Country of Los Angeles, Case No. BC394915 c/w BC
397482). In connection with the suits filed by Manling Shen and Joshua Liu
against the Company, the Company filed a cross-complaint against the Company’s
former CEO—Jay Wang, in the Superior Court of California, Country of Los
Angeles, alleging Jay Wang of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and negligence,
and requesting for indemnification. This case has not been decided
yet.
Jay Wang, an individual, Cross
complainant, v Gridlink Technologies, Inc. (Superior Court of California,
Country of Los Angeles, Case No. BC394915 c/w BC397482). In connection with the
above-mentioned suits, in June 2009, the Company’s former CEO—Jay Wang filed
cross-complaint against the Company for accounting, declaratory relief, and
indemnification, alleging the Company of wrongful termination in violation of
public policy, violation of California Labor Code 1102.5, breach of contract to
terminate for cause, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty of loyalty, breach
of contract, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. This
case has not been decided yet.
The last
final status conference on March 26, 2010, the court granted another continuance
to extend the trial date to July 19, 2010.
14
ITEM
IA. RISK
FACTORS
As a
“smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company
is not required to provide information required by this Item.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED
SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None
ITEM
3.
DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM
4.
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
None
ITEM
5.
OTHER
INFORMATION
None
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
Number
|
Description | |
2.1
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger (1)
|
|
3.1
|
Certificate
of Incorporation (2)
|
|
3.2
|
Certificate
of Merger (3)
|
|
3.3
|
Bylaws
(2)
|
|
31.1
|
Section
302 Certification by the Corporation’s Chief Executive
Officer *
|
|
31.2
|
Section
302 Certification by the Corporation’s Chief Financial Officer
*
|
|
32.1
|
Section
906 Certification by the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer
*
|
|
32.2
|
Section
906 Certification by the Corporation's Chief Financial Officer
*
|
* Filed
herewith.
(1) Incorporated
by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 19,
2009.
(2) Incorporated
by reference from the Registrant’s registration statement on Form 10-12G filed
on March 28, 2008.
(3) Incorporated
by reference from the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 26,
2009.
15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this Report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
May
19, 2010
|
MAXSYS
HOLDINGS, INC., INC.
|
|
By:
|
/s/ William
Elder
|
|
By:
|
William
Elder
Chief
Executive Officer
/s/ Cheng-Yu
Wang
Cheng-Yu
Wang
Chief
Financial Officer
|
16