Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP | y03432exv31w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP | y03432exv31w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 |
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 333-133253
HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
84-1696500 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
2939 Miller Road, Decatur, GA (Address of principal executive offices) |
30035 (Zip code) |
(770) 981-9460
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes o No o *
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of March 31, 2010, there were 100 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding, with a
par value of $0.01 per share. All outstanding shares are owned by a subsidiary of M & F Worldwide
Corp.
* | The registrant is not required to file this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or other reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, but has filed all reports during the preceding 12 months that would have been required pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The filing is required, however, pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing Harland Clarke Holdings Corp.s senior notes due 2015. |
HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP.
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in millions, except share and per share data)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 159.9 | $ | 63.9 | ||||
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $3.0 and $3.0) |
115.9 | 119.7 | ||||||
Investments in marketable securities |
24.6 | 24.6 | ||||||
Inventories |
30.4 | 32.5 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
13.2 | 13.5 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
18.6 | 18.6 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
62.8 | 66.1 | ||||||
Total current assets |
425.4 | 338.9 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
348.0 | 345.6 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(195.2 | ) | (184.5 | ) | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
152.8 | 161.1 | ||||||
Goodwill |
1,472.8 | 1,473.2 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
1,161.2 | 1,187.9 | ||||||
Contract acquisition payments, net |
29.7 | 28.6 | ||||||
Other assets |
64.3 | 62.3 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,306.2 | $ | 3,252.0 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 38.1 | $ | 33.9 | ||||
Deferred revenues |
113.3 | 116.1 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
19.5 | 19.5 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities: |
||||||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits |
63.1 | 52.6 | ||||||
Income and other taxes payable |
44.3 | 15.4 | ||||||
Customer incentives |
26.3 | 23.5 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
32.3 | 30.8 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
336.9 | 291.8 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
2,214.1 | 2,219.3 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
406.2 | 415.3 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
72.5 | 79.6 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock 200 shares authorized; par value $0.01; 100
shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 |
| | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
157.0 | 157.0 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
130.2 | 98.0 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes: |
||||||||
Currency translation adjustments |
(0.1 | ) | 0.3 | |||||
Funded status of benefit plans |
(1.6 | ) | (1.6 | ) | ||||
Derivative fair-value adjustments |
(9.7 | ) | (8.6 | ) | ||||
Unrealized gains on investments, net |
0.7 | 0.9 | ||||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes |
(10.7 | ) | (9.0 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
276.5 | 246.0 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 3,306.2 | $ | 3,252.0 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(in millions)
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Product revenues, net |
$ | 355.6 | $ | 363.1 | ||||
Service revenues, net |
74.4 | 75.5 | ||||||
Total net revenues |
430.0 | 438.6 | ||||||
Cost of products sold |
209.8 | 221.2 | ||||||
Cost of services provided |
37.7 | 39.9 | ||||||
Total cost of revenues |
247.5 | 261.1 | ||||||
Gross profit |
182.5 | 177.5 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
96.1 | 104.0 | ||||||
Restructuring costs |
3.2 | 11.1 | ||||||
Operating income |
83.2 | 62.4 | ||||||
Interest income |
0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(29.9 | ) | (38.1 | ) | ||||
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
| 52.6 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
53.5 | 77.2 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
21.3 | 30.0 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 32.2 | $ | 47.2 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 32.2 | $ | 47.2 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
13.2 | 14.8 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
27.1 | 25.6 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
1.7 | 1.8 | ||||||
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
| (52.6 | ) | |||||
Deferred income taxes |
(8.3 | ) | 11.7 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of businesses acquired: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
3.7 | (12.5 | ) | |||||
Inventories |
2.1 | (0.5 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(2.6 | ) | (10.0 | ) | ||||
Contract acquisition payments, net |
(1.0 | ) | 0.8 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
8.2 | (15.7 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenues |
(0.4 | ) | 5.2 | |||||
Income and other taxes |
28.9 | 16.9 | ||||||
Payable to parent |
| (0.7 | ) | |||||
Other, net |
0.5 | 1.3 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
105.3 | 33.3 | ||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Net repayments of related party notes receivable |
2.0 | 5.3 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
1.1 | 0.3 | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
(6.6 | ) | (11.8 | ) | ||||
Capitalized interest |
| (0.1 | ) | |||||
Other, net |
(0.6 | ) | (1.4 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(4.1 | ) | (7.7 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Redemption of notes |
| (35.1 | ) | |||||
Repayments of credit agreements and other borrowings |
(5.2 | ) | (4.9 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(5.2 | ) | (40.0 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
96.0 | (14.4 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
63.9 | 64.6 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 159.9 | $ | 50.2 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid for: |
||||||||
Interest, net of amounts capitalized |
$ | 21.6 | $ | 33.7 | ||||
Income taxes, net of refunds |
0.2 | 1.7 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. (Harland Clarke Holdings and, together with its subsidiaries,
the Company) is a holding company that conducts its operations through its direct and indirect,
wholly owned operating subsidiaries and was incorporated in Delaware on October 19, 2005. On
December 15, 2005, CA Investment Corp., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of M & F Worldwide
Corp. (M & F Worldwide), purchased 100% of the
capital stock of Novar USA Inc. (Novar). Novar was
renamed Clarke American Corp. (Clarke American) which was the successor by merger to Novar, which
indirectly wholly owned the operating subsidiaries of the Clarke American business. On May 1, 2007,
the Company completed the acquisition of John H. Harland Company (Harland) and changed its name
on May 2, 2007 from Clarke American to Harland Clarke Holdings.
During December 2009, Harland Clarke Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired
in separate transactions SubscriberMail and Protocol Integrated Marketing Services (Protocol
IMS), a division of Protocol Global Solutions. The aggregate consideration of $13.1 for these
transactions includes contingent consideration of $1.8 for SubscriberMail upon the achievement of
certain revenue targets in 2010 and 2011, with a maximum contingent consideration of $2.0 if the
targets are met (see Note 3). SubscriberMail is a leading email marketing service provider that
offers patented tools to develop and deliver professional email communications. Protocol IMS
focuses on direct marketing services with solutions that include business to business strategic
services, business to consumer strategic services, database marketing and analytics, outbound
business to business teleservices, production and fulfillment.
The Company has organized its business and corporate structure along the following three
business segments: Harland Clarke, Harland Financial Solutions and Scantron.
The Harland Clarke segment offers checks and related products, forms and treasury supplies,
and related delivery and fraud prevention products to financial services, retail and software
providers. It also provides direct marketing services to their clients including direct marketing
campaigns, direct mail, database marketing, telemarketing and e-mail marketing. In addition to
these products and services, the Harland Clarke segment offers stationery, business cards and other
business and home office products to consumers and small businesses.
The Harland Financial Solutions segment provides technology products and services to financial
services clients worldwide including lending and mortgage compliance and origination applications,
risk management solutions, business intelligence solutions, Internet and mobile banking
applications, branch automation solutions and core processing systems.
The Scantron segment provides data management solutions and related services to educational,
commercial, healthcare and governmental entities worldwide including testing and assessment
solutions, patient information collection and tracking, and survey services. Scantrons solutions
combine a variety of data collection, analysis, and management tools including web-based solutions,
software, scanning equipment, forms and related field maintenance services.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
majority-owned subsidiaries after the elimination of all material intercompany accounts and
transactions. The Company has consolidated the results of operations and accounts of businesses
acquired from the date of acquisition.
The Company and each of its existing subsidiaries, other than unrestricted subsidiaries and
certain immaterial subsidiaries are guarantors and may also be co-issuers under the 2015 Senior
Notes (as hereinafter defined) (see Note 11). Harland Clarke Holdings is a holding company and has
no independent assets at March 31, 2010 and no operations. The guarantees and the obligations of
the subsidiaries of the Company are full and unconditional and joint and several, and any
subsidiaries of the Company other than the subsidiary guarantors and obligors are not significant.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and
with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been included. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year. These consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009.
4
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
All terms used but not defined elsewhere herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the
Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Reference is made to the significant accounting policies of the Company described in the notes
to the consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted new guidance for fair value measurements and
disclosures. The new guidance requires disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2
and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements related to Level 3
measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation
and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The new guidance increases
disclosure requirements but does not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Guidance
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued new guidance for
certain arrangements that include software elements. The new guidance removes non-software
components of tangible products and software components of tangible products that have software
components essential to the functionality of the tangible product from the scope of software
revenue recognition.
In October 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements.
The new guidance requires entities to allocate revenue in a multiple-deliverable arrangement within
the scope of the guidance using estimated selling prices based on a selling price hierarchy. It
also eliminates the residual method of revenue allocation and requires revenue to be allocated
using the relative selling price method. In addition, the new guidance significantly expands
qualitative and quantitative disclosure requirements for multiple-deliverable arrangements.
The new guidance for certain arrangements that include software elements and
multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June
15, 2010. The guidance may be applied retrospectively for all periods presented, or prospectively
to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the adoption date. Early adoption is
permitted provided that the guidance is retroactively applied to the beginning of the year of
adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated
financial condition and results of operations.
3. Acquisitions
Acquisition of Protocol IMS and SubscriberMail
During December 2009, Harland Clarke Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired
in separate transactions 100% of the equity of SubscriberMail and certain assets and liabilities of
Protocol IMS. The aggregate consideration of $13.1 for these transactions includes contingent
consideration of $1.8 for SubscriberMail upon the achievement of certain revenue targets in 2010
and 2011, with a maximum contingent consideration of $2.0 if the targets are met. SubscriberMail is
a leading email marketing service provider that offers patented tools to develop and deliver
professional email communications. SubscriberMail results of operations have been included in the
Companys operations since December 31, 2009, the date of its acquisition. Protocol IMS focuses on
direct marketing services with solutions that include business to business strategic services,
business to consumer strategic services, database marketing and analytics, outbound business to
business teleservices, production and fulfillment. Protocol IMS results of operations have been
included in the Companys operations since December 4, 2009, the date of its acquisition. The
preliminary allocations of purchase price resulted in identified intangible assets of $4.2 and
goodwill of $7.2, which are deductible for tax purposes.
The pro forma effects on the results of operations for these acquisitions were not material.
5
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
4. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Finished goods |
$ | 8.4 | $ | 9.8 | ||||
Work-in-process |
8.4 | 9.5 | ||||||
Raw materials |
13.6 | 13.2 | ||||||
$ | 30.4 | $ | 32.5 | |||||
5. Assets Held For Sale
At March 31, 2010, assets held for sale consist of the following Harland Clarke segment facilities:
Location | Former Use | Year Closed | ||
Atlanta, GA |
Operations Support | 2008 | ||
Atlanta, GA |
Printing | 2008 | ||
Greensboro, NC |
Printing | 2009 | ||
Atlanta, GA |
Information Technology | 2010 |
In 2010, the Company closed its information technology facility in Atlanta, GA and relocated
those operations into an existing facility. The Greensboro facility was closed to better utilize
plant network capacity and maximize manufacturing and distribution efficiencies. The other Atlanta
facilities were closed as part of the Companys plan to exit duplicative facilities related to an
acquisition. Subsequent to the classification of the Atlanta facilities as assets held for sale,
there have been significant changes in the real estate market. The Company continues to make
appropriate changes to its marketing plan and believes these facilities will be sold within twelve
months. In January 2010, the Company sold its Syracuse facility, which was closed in 2009, for its
carrying value of $1.1.
Assets held for sale are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consist of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Land |
$ | 2.1 | $ | 1.4 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
3.2 | 3.5 | ||||||
$ | 5.3 | $ | 4.9 | |||||
6
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The change in carrying amount of goodwill by business segment for the three months ended March
31, 2010 is as follows:
Harland | ||||||||||||||||
Harland | Financial | |||||||||||||||
Clarke | Solutions | Scantron | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
$ | 779.4 | $ | 425.2 | $ | 268.6 | $ | 1,473.2 | ||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
| (0.4 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2010
|
$ | 779.4 | $ | 424.8 | $ | 268.6 | $ | 1,472.8 | ||||||||
Useful lives, gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization for other intangible
assets are as follows:
Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | |||||||||||||||||||
Useful Life | March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
(in years) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized intangible assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
3 20 | $ | 1,233.4 | $ | 1,233.4 | $ | 282.7 | $ | 260.5 | |||||||||||
Trademarks and tradenames |
2 25 | 154.5 | 154.5 | 5.6 | 3.4 | |||||||||||||||
Software and other |
2 10 | 65.4 | 65.1 | 30.4 | 28.2 | |||||||||||||||
Patents and patents pending |
3 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 4.4 | 4.0 | |||||||||||||||
1,473.3 | 1,473.0 | 323.1 | 296.1 | |||||||||||||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks and tradenames |
11.0 | 11.0 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Total other intangible assets |
$ | 1,484.3 | $ | 1,484.0 | $ | 323.1 | $ | 296.1 | ||||||||||||
Amortization expense was $27.1 and $25.6 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets through December 31, 2014 is as
follows:
Nine months ending December 31, 2010
|
$ | 81.6 | ||
Year ending December 31, 2011
|
102.4 | |||
Year ending December 31, 2012
|
95.0 | |||
Year ending December 31, 2013
|
83.7 | |||
Year ending December 31, 2014
|
77.3 |
7. Business Segment Information
The Company has organized its business along three reportable segments together with a
corporate group for certain support services. The Companys operations are aligned on the basis of
products, services and industry. Management measures and evaluates the reportable segments based on
operating income. The current segments and their principal activities consist of the following:
| Harland Clarke segment Provides checks and related products, direct marketing services and customized business and home products to financial, retail and software providers, as well as consumers and small businesses. This segment operates primarily in the United States and Puerto Rico. | ||
| Harland Financial Solutions segment Provides technology products and services to financial services clients worldwide. This segment operates primarily in the United States, Israel and Ireland. | ||
| Scantron segment Provides data management solutions and related services to educational, commercial, healthcare and governmental entities worldwide. This segment operates in the United States and Canada. |
7
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Selected summarized financial information for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 is as follows:
Harland | ||||||||||||||||||||
Harland | Financial | Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||
Clarke(1) | Solutions | Scantron | and Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Product revenues, net: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
$ | 308.6 | $ | 16.8 | $ | 30.2 | $ | | $ | 355.6 | ||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
314.1 | 17.0 | 32.0 | | 363.1 | |||||||||||||||
Service revenues, net: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
$ | 1.1 | $ | 52.5 | $ | 20.8 | $ | | $ | 74.4 | ||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
1.0 | 52.2 | 22.3 | | 75.5 | |||||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
$ | | $ | | $ | 0.1 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | | |||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
| | 0.1 | (0.1 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss): (2) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
$ | 65.6 | $ | 11.4 | $ | 9.3 | $ | (3.1 | ) | $ | 83.2 | |||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
50.9 | 7.4 | 6.8 | (2.7 | ) | 62.4 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (excluding
amortization of deferred financing fees): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
$ | 26.8 | $ | 7.1 | $ | 6.4 | $ | | $ | 40.3 | ||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
27.3 | 6.7 | 6.4 | | 40.4 | |||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures (excluding capital
leases): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
$ | 4.4 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 1.3 | $ | | $ | 6.6 | ||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
8.2 | 1.0 | 2.6 | | 11.8 |
(1) | Includes results of the acquired Protocol IMS and SubscriberMail businesses from their respective dates of acquisition. | |
(2) | Includes restructuring costs of $3.2 and $11.1 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively (see Note 16). |
8. Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 32.2 | $ | 47.2 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(0.4 | ) | (0.8 | ) | ||||
Derivative fair-value adjustments, net of taxes of $0.6 and $2.4 |
(1.1 | ) | 3.7 | |||||
Unrealized losses on investments, net of taxes of $0.1 and $ |
(0.2 | ) | | |||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 30.5 | $ | 50.1 | ||||
8
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
9. Postretirement Defined Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors two unfunded postretirement defined benefit plans that cover certain
former salaried and non-salaried employees. One plan provides healthcare benefits and the other
provides life insurance benefits. The medical plan is contributory and contributions are adjusted
annually based on actual claims experience. For retirees who retired prior to December 31, 2002
with twenty or more years of service at December 31, 2000, the Company contributes approximately
50% of the cost of the medical plan. For all other retirees, the Companys intent is that the
retirees provide the majority of the actual cost of the medical plan. The life insurance plan is
noncontributory for those employees that retired by December 31, 2002.
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for these plans is as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Interest cost |
$ | 0.3 | $ | 0.3 | ||||
Net amortization |
| | ||||||
Net postretirement benefit cost |
$ | 0.3 | $ | 0.3 | ||||
10. Income Taxes
The Company is subject to taxation in the United States and various state and foreign
jurisdictions. The statute of limitations for the Companys federal and state tax returns for the
tax years 2005 through 2009 generally remain open. In addition, open tax years related to foreign
jurisdictions remain subject to examination but are not considered material.
There are no events that have occurred since December 31, 2009 that had a material impact on
amounts accrued for the Companys uncertain tax positions.
11. Long-Term Debt
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
$1,900.0 Senior Secured Credit Facilities |
$ | 1,750.5 | $ | 1,755.0 | ||||
Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2015 |
206.8 | 206.8 | ||||||
9.50% Senior Fixed Rate Notes due 2015 |
271.3 | 271.3 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations and other indebtedness |
5.0 | 5.7 | ||||||
2,233.6 | 2,238.8 | |||||||
Less: current maturities |
(19.5 | ) | (19.5 | ) | ||||
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
$ | 2,214.1 | $ | 2,219.3 | ||||
$1,900.0 Senior Secured Credit Facilities
On April 4, 2007, the Company and substantially all of its subsidiaries as co-borrowers
entered into a credit agreement (the Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement provides for a
$1,800.0 senior secured term loan (the Term Loan), which was fully drawn at closing on May 1,
2007 and matures on June 30, 2014. The Company is required to repay the Term Loan in equal
quarterly installments in aggregate annual amounts equal to 1% of the original principal amount. In
addition, the Credit Agreement requires that a portion of the Companys excess cash flow be applied
to prepay amounts borrowed, as further described below. The Credit Agreement also provides for a
$100.0 revolving credit facility (the Revolver) that matures on June 28, 2013. The Revolver
includes an up to $60.0 subfacility in the form of letters of credit and an up to $30.0 subfacility
in the form of short-term swing line loans. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings
outstanding under
the Term Loan was 2.8% at March 31, 2010. As of March 31, 2010, there were no outstanding
borrowings under the Revolver and there was $87.8 available for borrowing (giving effect to the
issuance of $12.2 of letters of credit).
9
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Under certain circumstances, the Company is permitted to incur additional term loan
and/or revolving credit facility indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount of up to $250.0. In
addition, the terms of the Credit Agreement and the 2015 Senior Notes (as defined below) allow the
Company to incur substantial additional debt.
Loans under the Credit Agreement bear, at the Companys option, interest at:
| A rate per annum equal to the higher of (a) the prime rate of Credit Suisse and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%, in each case plus an applicable margin of 1.50% per annum for revolving loans and for term loans; or | ||
| A rate per annum equal to a reserve-adjusted LIBOR rate, plus an applicable margin of 2.50% per annum for revolving loans and for term loans. |
The Credit Agreement has a commitment fee for the unused portion of the Revolver and for
issued letters of credit of 0.50% and 2.63%, respectively. Interest rate margins and commitment
fees under the Revolver are subject to reduction in increments based upon the Company achieving
certain consolidated leverage ratios.
The Company and each of its existing and future domestic subsidiaries, other than unrestricted
subsidiaries and certain immaterial subsidiaries, are guarantors and may also be co-borrowers under
the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Companys direct parent, CA Acquisition Holdings, Inc., is a
guarantor under the Credit Agreement. The senior secured credit facilities are secured by a
perfected first priority security interest in substantially all of the Companys, each of the
co-borrowers and the guarantors tangible and intangible assets and equity interests (other than
voting stock in excess of 65.0% of the outstanding voting stock of each direct foreign subsidiary
and certain other excluded property).
The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants including, among
other things, restrictions on indebtedness, liens, mergers and consolidations, sales of assets,
loans, acquisitions, restricted payments, transactions with affiliates, dividends and other payment
restrictions affecting subsidiaries and sale-leaseback transactions. The Credit Agreement requires
the Company to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio for the benefit of lenders under the
Revolver only. The Company has the right to prepay the Term Loan at any time without premium or
penalty, subject to certain breakage costs, and the Company may also reduce any unutilized portion
of the Revolver at any time, in minimum principal amounts set forth in the Credit Agreement. The
Company is required to prepay the Term Loan with 50% of excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit
Agreement, with certain reductions set forth in the Credit Agreement, based on achievement and
maintenance of leverage ratios) and 100% of the net proceeds of certain issuances, offerings or
placements of debt obligations of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (other than permitted
debt). Each such prepayment will be applied first to the next eight unpaid quarterly amortization
installments on the term loans and second to the remaining amortization installments on the term
loans on a pro rata basis. No such excess cash flow payment was required to be paid in 2010 with
respect to 2009.
The Credit Agreement also contains certain customary affirmative covenants and events of
default. Such events of default include, but are not limited to: non-payment of amounts when due;
violation of covenants; material inaccuracy of representations and warranties; cross default and
cross acceleration with respect to other material debt; bankruptcy and other insolvency events;
certain ERISA events; invalidity of guarantees or security documents; and material judgments. Some
of these events of default allow for grace periods.
If a change of control (as defined in the Credit Agreement) occurs, the Company will be
required to make an offer to prepay all outstanding term loans under the Credit Agreement at 101%
of the outstanding principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, and lenders holding a
majority of the revolving credit commitments may elect to terminate the revolving credit
commitments in full. The Company is also required to offer to prepay outstanding term loans at 100%
of the principal amount to be prepaid, plus accrued and unpaid interest, with the proceeds of
certain asset sales under certain circumstances.
Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company was required to ensure that, until no
earlier than May 1, 2009, at least 40% of the aggregate principal amount of its long-term
indebtedness bears interest at a fixed rate, either by its terms or
through entering into hedging agreements within 180 days of the effectiveness of the Credit
Agreement. In order to comply with this requirement, the Company entered into interest rate
derivative arrangements described in Note 12.
10
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Senior Notes due 2015
On May 1, 2007, the Company issued $305.0 aggregate principal amount of Senior Floating Rate
Notes due 2015 (the Floating Rate Notes) and $310.0 aggregate principal amount of 9.50% Senior
Fixed Rate Notes due 2015 (the Fixed Rate Notes and, together with the Floating Rate Notes, the
2015 Senior Notes). The 2015 Senior Notes mature on May 15, 2015. The Fixed Rate Notes bear
interest at a rate per annum of 9.50%, payable on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The Floating
Rate Notes bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the Applicable LIBOR Rate (as defined in the
indenture governing the 2015 Senior Notes (the Indenture)), subject to a floor of 1.25%, plus
4.75%, payable on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each year. The interest rate on
the Floating Rate Notes was 6.0% at March 31, 2010. The Senior Notes are unsecured and are
therefore effectively subordinated to all of the Companys senior secured indebtedness, including
outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement. The Company and each of its existing
subsidiaries, other than unrestricted subsidiaries and certain immaterial subsidiaries, are
guarantors and may also be co-issuers under the 2015 Senior Notes.
The Indenture contains customary restrictive covenants, including, among other things,
restrictions on the Companys ability to incur additional debt, pay dividends and make
distributions, make certain investments, repurchase stock, incur liens, enter into transactions
with affiliates, enter into sale and lease back transactions, merge or consolidate and transfer or
sell assets. The Company must offer to repurchase all of the 2015 Senior Notes upon the occurrence
of a change of control, as defined in the Indenture, at a purchase price equal to 101% of their
aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company must also offer to
repurchase the 2015 Senior Notes with the proceeds from certain sales of assets, if it does not
apply those proceeds within a specified time period after the sale, at a purchase price equal to
100% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
During
2009, the Company extinguished $136.9 principal amount of debt by
purchasing 2015 Senior Notes in individually negotiated transactions
for an aggregate purchase price of $67.6.
Gain on Early Extinguishment of Debt
Of
the $136.9 principal amount of debt extinguished in 2009,
$90.5 was extinguished during the first quarter of 2009 by purchasing 2015 Senior Notes in individually negotiated transactions for an aggregate
purchase price of $35.1, resulting in a gain of $52.6 after the write-off of $2.8 of unamortized
deferred financing fees related to the extinguished debt. There were no early extinguishments of
debt during the first quarter of 2010.
Capital Lease Obligations and Other Indebtedness
The Company has outstanding capital lease obligations and other indebtedness with principal
balances totaling $5.0 and $5.7 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. These
obligations have imputed interest rates ranging from 5.7% to 9.6% and have required payments,
including interest, of $1.0 remaining in 2010, $1.6 in 2011, $1.2 in 2012, $1.1 in 2013 and $0.9 in
2014. During the first quarter of 2009, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a capital lease
and other indebtedness totaling $1.2 and, accordingly, such non-cash transaction amounts have been
excluded from the consolidated statements of cash flows.
12. Derivative Financial Instruments
Interest Rate Hedges
The Company uses hedge transactions, which are accounted for as cash flow hedges, to limit the
Companys risk on a portion of its variable-rate debt.
During February 2006, the Company entered into interest rate hedge transactions in the form of
three-year interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $150.0, which became effective on
July 1, 2006. The hedges expired on June 30, 2009. The hedges were designed to swap the underlying
variable rate for a fixed rate of 4.992%. On May 1, 2007, the Companys prior credit facilities
were repaid in full. The Company redesignated the swaps as a hedge against the variable interest
rate on a portion of its Term Loan. The Company amortized the fair value of the derivative
liability of $0.4 as of May 1, 2007 in interest expense in the consolidated statements of income
over the remaining life of the derivative contract using the straight-line method.
During June 2007, the Company entered into additional interest rate derivative transactions in
the form of a two-year interest rate swap with a notional amount of $255.0 and a three-year
interest rate swap with a notional amount of $255.0, which became effective on June 29, 2007. The
two-year hedge, which expired on June 30, 2009, swapped the underlying variable rate for a fixed
rate of 5.323% and the three-year hedge swapped the underlying variable rate for a fixed rate of
5.362%. During August 2007, the Company entered into an additional interest rate derivative
transaction in the form of a
11
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
two-year interest rate swap with a notional amount of $250.0, which became effective on
September 28, 2007. The hedge, which expired on September 28, 2009, swapped the underlying variable
rate for a fixed rate of 4.977%.
During June 2009, the Company entered into an interest rate derivative transaction in the form
of a three-year interest rate swap with a notional amount of $350.0, which became effective on June
30, 2009. This hedge swaps the underlying variable rate for a fixed rate of 2.353%. During
September 2009, the Company entered into an additional interest rate derivative transaction in the
form of a three-year interest rate swap with a notional amount of $250.0, which became effective on
September 30, 2009. This hedge swaps the underlying variable rate for a fixed rate of 2.140%.
The following presents the fair values of these derivative instruments and the classification
in the consolidated balance sheets.
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedging Instruments: | Balance Sheet Classification | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Interest rate swaps |
Other current liabilities | $ | 3.3 | $ | 6.3 | |||||
Other liabilities | 12.6 | 7.9 |
Fair value of interest rate swaps is based on forward-looking interest rate curves as provided
by the counterparty, adjusted for the Companys credit risk.
These derivative instruments had no ineffective portions during the three months ended March
31, 2010 and 2009. Accordingly, no amounts were required to be reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss to the consolidated statements of income due to ineffectiveness. The following
presents the effect of these derivative instruments (effective portion) on other comprehensive
income and amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into interest expense.
Loss Reclassified from | ||||||||||||||||
Accumulated Other | ||||||||||||||||
Loss Recognized in Other | Comprehensive Loss into | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income | Interest Expense for the | |||||||||||||||
for the Three Months | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedging Instruments: | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
$ | 8.0 | $ | 2.5 | $ | 6.3 | $ | 8.5 |
The Company expects to reclassify approximately $18.7 into net income as additional interest
expense during the twelve months ending March 31, 2011.
The following presents the balances and net changes in the accumulated other comprehensive
loss related to these derivative instruments, net of income taxes.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
Balances and Net Changes: | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 8.6 | $ | 16.8 | ||||
Loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into interest expense, net of
taxes of $2.5 and $3.3 |
(3.8 | ) | (5.2 | ) | ||||
Net change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of taxes of $3.1 and $1.0 |
4.9 | 1.5 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 9.7 | $ | 13.1 | ||||
12
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited
See Note 8 for additional information regarding the effect of these derivative
instruments on other comprehensive income.
13. Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures fair value using a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the
inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs
such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in
active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as
unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to
develop its own assumptions.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
As of March 31, 2010, the Company held two types of financial instruments subject to valuation
on a recurring basis, marketable securities and interest rate swaps. Marketable securities consist
of corporate equity securities and United States treasury securities. The marketable securities are
included in investments in marketable securities and other assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. The interest rate swaps are included in other current liabilities and other
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Fair values as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 are as follows:
Balance at | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
United States treasury securities |
$ | 24.6 | $ | 24.6 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Corporate equity securities |
1.5 | 1.5 | | | ||||||||||||
Liability for interest rate swaps |
15.9 | | 15.9 | |
Balance at | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
United States treasury securities |
$ | 24.6 | $ | 24.6 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Corporate equity securities |
1.9 | 1.9 | | | ||||||||||||
Liability for interest rate swaps |
14.2 | | 14.2 | |
Fair value of interest rate swaps is based on forward-looking interest rate curves as provided
by the counterparty, adjusted for the Companys credit risk. Fair value of corporate equity
securities and United States treasury securities are based on quoted market prices.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Most of the Companys clients are in the financial services and educational industries. The
Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its clients and maintains allowances for potential
credit losses. The Company does not generally require collateral. Actual losses and allowances have
been within managements expectations.
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value. The estimated fair value of long-term debt
is determined by Level 2 inputs and is based primarily on quoted market prices for the same or
similar issues as of the measurement date. The estimated fair value of long-term debt at March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009 was approximately $2,032.0 and $1,912.5, respectively. The carrying
value of long-
term debt at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $2,233.6 and $2,238.8, respectively.
13
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
14. Marketable Securities
The Companys marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at
their fair values (quoted market price), which are as follows:
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
United States treasury securities |
$ | 24.6 | $ | | $ | | $ | 24.6 | ||||||||
Corporate equity securities |
0.3 | 1.3 | (0.1 | ) | 1.5 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 24.9 | $ | 1.3 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 26.1 | |||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
United States treasury securities |
$ | 24.6 | $ | | $ | | $ | 24.6 | ||||||||
Corporate equity securities |
0.3 | 1.7 | (0.1 | ) | 1.9 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 24.9 | $ | 1.7 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 26.5 | |||||||
The United States treasury securities mature in 2012.
The following presents the gross unrealized losses and fair values of the Companys
investments in individual securities that have been in a continuous unrealized position deemed to
be temporary for less than 12 months and for more than 12 months, aggregated by category:
Less Than 12 Months | More Than 12 Months | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | |||||||||||||
At March 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate equity securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.1 | ||||||||
At December 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate equity securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.1 |
The Company has determined that the gross unrealized losses on its investments at March 31,
2010 are temporary in nature. Accordingly, the Company does not consider the investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2010.
15. Commitments and Contingencies
Honeywell Indemnification
Certain of the intermediate holding companies of the predecessor of the Company had issued
guarantees on behalf of operating companies formerly owned by these intermediate holding companies,
which operating companies are not part of the Companys businesses. In the stock purchase agreement
executed in connection with the acquisition of the Company by M & F Worldwide, Honeywell agreed to
use its commercially reasonable efforts to assume, replace or terminate such
guarantees and indemnify M & F Worldwide and its affiliates, including the Company and its
subsidiaries, with respect to all liabilities arising under such guarantees.
Other
In June 2008, Kenneth Kitson, purportedly on behalf of himself and a class of other alleged
similarly situated commercial borrowers from the Bank of Edwardsville, an Illinois-based community
bank (BOE), filed in an Illinois state court an amended complaint that re-asserted previously
filed claims against BOE and added claims against Harland Financial Solutions, Inc. (HFS). The
amended complaint alleged, among other things, that HFSs LaserPro software permitted BOE to
generate loan documents that were deceptive and usurious in that they failed to disclose properly
the effect of the
14
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
365/360 method of calculating interest. Following the removal of the action to the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, the District Court entered an order
granting with prejudice HFSs motion to dismiss Mr. Kitsons claims. In August 2009, Mr. Kitson,
individually and as class representative, and BOE agreed to settle and dismiss with prejudice all
remaining claims. Separately but concurrently, BOEs warranty claim against HFS was settled, in
exchange for, among other things, payment by HFS of $0.2. The class settlement agreement was
approved by the District Court in January 2010.
Other commercial borrowers that have obtained loans from other banks in Illinois, Ohio and
South Carolina have commenced similar class actions against their banks using similar theories. In
some cases, the banks have made warranty claims against HFS related to these class actions. Many of
the class actions and related warranty claims are at early stages, and their likely progress is not
yet clear. The Company has not accepted any of the asserted warranty claims and does not believe
that any of these claims will result in material liability for the Company, but there can be no
assurance.
Various other legal proceedings, claims and investigations are pending against the Company,
including those relating to commercial transactions, product liability, environmental, safety and
health matters, employment matters and other matters. Most of these matters are covered by
insurance, subject to deductibles and maximum limits, and by third-party indemnities. In the
opinion of management, based upon the information available at this time, the outcome of the
matters referred to above will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
position or results of operations.
16. Restructuring
Harland Clarke and Corporate
The Company adopted plans during 2008, 2009 and 2010 to realize cost savings in the Harland
Clarke segment by consolidating printing plants, contact centers and selling, general and
administrative functions.
The Company expensed $1.3 for severance and severance-related costs and $0.4 for facilities
closures and other costs during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and expensed $6.8 for
severance and severance-related costs and $0.5 for facilities closures and other costs during the
three months ended March 31, 2009. The Company expects to incur in future periods an additional
$2.0 for costs related to these plans. Ongoing lease commitments related to these plans continue
through 2013.
The following table details the components of the Companys restructuring accruals under its
plans related to the Harland Clarke segment and Corporate for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009:
Beginning | Paid in | Non-cash | Ending | |||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expensed | Cash | Utilization | Balance | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Severance and severance-related |
$ | 2.5 | $ | 1.3 | $ | (1.8 | ) | $ | | $ | 2.0 | |||||||||
Facilities closures and other costs |
2.5 | 0.4 | (0.7 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 2.1 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 5.0 | $ | 1.7 | $ | (2.5 | ) | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 4.1 | ||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Severance and severance-related |
$ | 7.4 | $ | 6.8 | $ | (6.3 | ) | $ | | $ | 7.9 | |||||||||
Facilities closures and other costs |
2.3 | 0.5 | (0.5 | ) | (0.3 | ) | 2.0 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 9.7 | $ | 7.3 | $ | (6.8 | ) | $ | (0.3 | ) | $ | 9.9 | ||||||||
In addition to the amounts disclosed in the table above, the Company also incurred other
expenses related to the facility closures, including inventory write-offs, training, hiring and
travel.
Harland Financial Solutions
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company initiated a multi-year plan to reorganize
certain operations and sales and support functions within the Harland Financial Solutions segment.
The plan, which is expected to be completed by the end of
15
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
2011, focuses on moving from a product-centric organization to a functional organization in
order to enhance customer support.
The Company expensed $0.2 for severance and severance-related costs during the three months
ended March 31, 2010, and expensed $1.4 for severance and severance-related costs and $1.0 for
facilities closures and other costs during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The Company
currently expects to incur additional costs of $0.2 related to these plans, which is subject to
refinement as the reorganization progresses.
The following table details the Companys restructuring accruals related to the Harland
Financial Solutions segment for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Beginning | Paid in | Ending | ||||||||||||||
Balance | Expensed | Cash | Balance | |||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Severance and severance-related |
$ | 1.0 | $ | 0.2 | $ | (0.5 | ) | $ | 0.7 | |||||||
Facilities and other costs |
0.1 | | (0.1 | ) | | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1.1 | $ | 0.2 | $ | (0.6 | ) | $ | 0.7 | |||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Severance and severance-related |
$ | 1.4 | $ | 1.4 | $ | (1.3 | ) | $ | 1.5 | |||||||
Facilities and other costs |
0.7 | 1.0 | (0.2 | ) | 1.5 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2.1 | $ | 2.4 | $ | (1.5 | ) | $ | 3.0 | |||||||
Scantron
As a result of an acquisition, the Company adopted plans to restructure the Scantron segment
in 2008. These plans focused on improving operating margins through consolidating manufacturing and
printing operations and reducing duplicative selling, general and administrative expenses through
workforce rationalization, consolidation of certain redundant outsourcing and the reduction of
consulting and other professional services. The Company completed substantially all of the planned
employee terminations and consolidation of printing and manufacturing operations related to the
acquisition as of March 31, 2009 and expensed $1.4 for severance and severance-related costs during
the three months ended March 31, 2009.
The Company expensed $1.3 for severance and severance-related costs related to further
consolidation of operations and elimination of certain selling, general and administrative expenses
during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The following table details the components of the Companys restructuring accruals related to
the Scantron segment for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Beginning | Paid in | Ending | ||||||||||||||
Balance | Expensed | Cash | Balance | |||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Severance and severance-related |
$ | 0.5 | $ | 1.3 | $ | (1.2 | ) | $ | 0.6 | |||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
Severance and severance-related |
$ | 1.0 | $ | 1.4 | $ | (0.9 | ) | $ | 1.5 | |||||||
16
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
In addition to the amounts disclosed in the table above, the Company also incurred other
expenses related to the initiatives including inventory write-offs, training, hiring, relocation
and travel.
Restructuring accruals for all of the segments plans are reflected in other current
liabilities and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company
expects to pay the remaining severance, facilities and other costs related to the segments
restructuring plans through 2013.
17. Transactions with Related Parties
Notes Receivable
In 2008, Harland Clarke Holdings acquired the senior secured credit facility and outstanding
note of Delphax Technologies, Inc. (Delphax), the supplier of Imaggia printing machines and
related supplies and service for the Harland Clarke segment. The senior secured credit facility is
comprised of a revolving credit facility of up to $14.0, subject to borrowing limitations set forth
therein, that mature in September 2011. The senior secured credit facility is collateralized by a
perfected security interest in substantially all of Delphaxs assets. The revolving facility has a
borrowing base calculated based on Delphaxs eligible accounts receivable and inventory. The senior
secured credit facility has an interest rate equal to the sum of Wells Fargo N. A. prime rate plus
2.5%, with accrued interest payable quarterly. The note had an original principal amount of $7.0,
matures in September 2012 and originally bore interest at an annual rate of 12%, payable quarterly
either in cash or in a combination of cash and up to 25% Delphax stock. Contemporaneous with its
acquisition of the senior secured credit facility and the note, Harland Clarke Holdings also acquired
250,000 shares of Delphax common stock from the previous holder of the Delphax note. In January
2010, the note was amended to reduce the interest rate to 9%, payable solely in cash, effective
October 1, 2009, and to require the repayment of $3.0 of principal in 2010.
The outstanding balances on the senior secured credit facility and the note are included in
prepaid expenses and other current assets and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company received $2.0 in payments on the
note, bringing the principal balance of the note to $5.0 at March 31, 2010. An additional principal
payment of $1.0 on the note is due by June 30, 2010. Interest income of $0.1 and $0.3 was recorded
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Other
The Company expensed $0.7 and $0.7 during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, for services provided to the Company by M & F Worldwide. This amount is reflected in
selling, general and administrative expenses.
17
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion regarding our financial condition and results of operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 should be read in conjunction with the more detailed
financial information contained in our consolidated financial statements and their notes included
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Overview of Business
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. (Harland Clarke Holdings and, together with its subsidiaries,
the Company) is a holding company that conducts its operations through its direct and indirect
wholly owned subsidiaries and was incorporated in Delaware on October 19, 2005. On December 15,
2005, CA Investment Corp., an indirect wholly owned operating subsidiary of M & F Worldwide Corp.
(M & F Worldwide), purchased 100% of the capital
stock of Novar USA Inc. (Novar). Novar was renamed
Clarke American Corp., which was the successor by merger to Novar, which indirectly wholly owned
the operating subsidiaries of the Clarke American Corp. business. On May 1, 2007, the Company
completed the acquisition of John H. Harland Company (Harland) and changed its name on May 2,
2007 from Clarke American Corp. to Harland Clarke Holdings. The Companys businesses are organized
along three business segments together with a corporate group for certain support services.
The Harland Clarke segment offers checks and related products, forms and treasury supplies,
and related delivery and fraud prevention products to financial services, retail and software
providers. It also provides direct marketing services to their clients including direct marketing
campaigns, direct mail, database marketing, telemarketing and e-mail marketing. In addition to
these products and services, the Harland Clarke segment offers stationery, business cards and other
business and home office products to consumers and small businesses.
The Harland Financial Solutions segment provides technology products and services to financial
services clients worldwide including lending and mortgage compliance and origination applications,
risk management solutions, business intelligence solutions, Internet and mobile banking
applications, branch automation solutions and core processing systems.
The Scantron segment provides data management solutions and related services to educational,
commercial, healthcare and governmental entities worldwide including testing and assessment
solutions, patient information collection and tracking, and survey services. Scantrons solutions
combine a variety of data collection, analysis, and management tools including web-based solutions,
software, scanning equipment, forms, and related field maintenance services.
The SubscriberMail and Protocol IMS Acquisitions
During December 2009, Harland Clarke Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired
in separate transactions SubscriberMail and Protocol Integrated Marketing Services (Protocol
IMS), a division of Protocol Global Solutions. The aggregate consideration of $13.1 million for
these transactions includes contingent consideration of $1.8 million for SubscriberMail upon the
achievement of certain revenue targets in 2010 and 2011, with a maximum contingent consideration of
$2.0 million if the targets are met. SubscriberMail is a leading email marketing service provider
that offers patented tools to develop and deliver professional email communications. Protocol IMS
focuses on direct marketing services with solutions that include business to business strategic
services, business to consumer strategic services, database marketing and analytics, outbound
business to business teleservices, production and fulfillment.
Economic and Other Factors Affecting the Businesses of the Company
Harland Clarke
While total non-cash payments including checks, credit cards, debit cards and other
electronic forms of payment are growing, the number of checks written has declined and is
expected to continue to decline. Harland Clarke believes the number of checks printed is driven by
the number of checks written, the number of new checking accounts opened and reorders reflecting
changes in consumers personal situations, such as name or address changes. In recent quarters,
Harland Clarke had experienced check unit declines at a higher rate than in the past, as evidenced
by recent period-over-period declines in Harland Clarke revenue which are discussed in
more detail elsewhere in this report. Harland Clarke is unable to determine at this time
whether these higher rates of decline are attributable to recent economic and financial market
difficulties, the depth and length of the
18
Table of Contents
Harland
Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
economic recession, higher unemployment, decreased
openings of checking accounts, changing business strategies of our financial institution clients,
decreased consumer spending and/or a further acceleration in the use of alternative non-cash
payments. Harland Clarke expects that check unit volume will continue to decline at rates that are
higher than it had previously experienced in recent years, resulting in a corresponding decrease in
check revenues and depending on the nature and relative magnitude of the causes for the decreases,
such decreases may not be mitigated when overall economic conditions improve. Harland Clarke is
focused on growing its non-check related products and services, including marketing services, and
optimizing its existing catalog of offerings to better serve its clients, as well as managing its
costs, overhead and facilities to reflect the decline in check unit volumes. Harland Clarke does
not believe that revenues from non-check related products and services will fully offset revenue
declines from declining check unit volumes. In the future, Harland Clarke may not be able to
mitigate the revenue declines from declining check unit volumes through cost management, which
could negatively affect Harland Clarkes margins.
Harland Clarkes primary competition comes from alternative payment methods such as debit
cards, credit cards, ACH, and other electronic and online payment options. Harland Clarke also
competes with large providers that offer a wide variety of products and services including Deluxe
Corporation, Harte-Hanks, Inc., and R.R. Donnelly & Sons Company. There are also many other
competitors that specialize in providing one or more of the products and services Harland Clarke
offers to its clients. Harland Clarke competes on the basis of service, convenience, quality,
product range and price.
The Harland Clarke segments operating results are also affected by consumer confidence and
employment. Consumer confidence directly correlates with consumer spending, while employment also
affects revenues through the number of new checking accounts being opened. The Harland Clarke
segments operating results may be negatively affected by slow or negative growth of, or downturns
in, the United States economy. Business confidence affects a portion of the Harland Clarke segment.
In addition, if Harland Clarkes financial institution customers fail or merge with other financial
institutions, Harland Clarke may lose any or all revenue from such financial institutions and/or
experience further pricing pressure, which would negatively affect Harland Clarkes operating
results.
Harland Financial Solutions
Harland Financial Solutions operating results are affected by the overall demand for our
products, software and related services, which is based upon the technology budgets of our clients
and prospects. Economic downturns in one or more of the countries in which we do business and
enhanced regulatory burdens, including through increased fees and assessments charged to financial
institutions by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and National Credit Union Association or
due to newly proposed Federal legislation for additional taxes on certain financial institutions,
could result in reductions in the information technology budgets for some portion of our clients
and potentially longer lead-times for acquiring Harland Financial Solutions products and services.
In addition, if Harland Financial Solutions financial institution customers fail or merge with
other financial institutions, Harland Financial Solutions may lose any or all revenue from such
financial institutions and/or experience further pricing pressure, which would negatively affect
Harland Financial Solutions operating results.
Harland Financial Solutions business is affected by technological change, evolving industry
standards, regulatory changes in client requirements and frequent new product introductions and
enhancements. The business of providing technological solutions to financial institutions and other
enterprises requires that we continually improve our existing products and create new products
while at the same time controlling our costs to remain price competitive.
Providing technological solutions to financial institutions is highly competitive and
fragmented. Harland Financial Solutions competes with several large and diversified financial
technology providers, including, among others, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.,
FISERV, Inc., Jack Henry & Associates, Inc., Open Solutions Inc., Computer Services Inc. and many
regional providers. Many multi-national and international providers of technological solutions to
financial institutions also compete with Harland Financial Solutions both
domestically and internationally, including TEMENOS Group AG, Misys plc, Infosys Technologies
Limited, Tata Consultancy and BISYS Group, Inc. There are also many other competitors that offer
one or more specialized products or services that compete with products and services offered by
Harland Financial Solutions.
19
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Management believes that competitive factors influencing buying decisions include product
features and functionality, client support, price and vendor financial stability.
Scantron
While the number of tests given annually in K-12 and higher education continues to grow, the
demand for optical mark reader paper-based testing has declined and is expected to continue to
decline. Changes in educational funding can affect the rate at which schools adopt new technology
thus slowing the decline for paper-based testing but also slowing the demand for Scantrons on-line
testing products. Educational funding changes may also reduce the rate of consumption of Scantrons
forms and purchase of additional hardware to process these forms. Scantrons education-based
customers may turn to lower cost solutions for paper-based forms and hardware in furtherance of
addressing their budget needs. A weak economy in the United States may negatively affect education
budgets and spending, which would have an adverse impact on Scantrons operating results. Data
collection is also experiencing a conversion to non-paper based methods of collection. Scantron
believes this trend will also continue as the availability of these alternative technologies
becomes more widespread. While Scantrons non-paper data collection business could benefit from
this trend, Scantrons paper-based data collection business could be negatively affected by this
trend. Changes in the overall economy can affect the demand for data collection to the extent that
Scantrons customers adjust their research or testing expenditures.
Restructuring
The Company has taken restructuring actions in the past in an effort to achieve manufacturing
and contact center efficiencies and other cost savings. Past restructuring actions have related to
both acquisitions and ongoing cost reduction initiatives and have included manufacturing plant
closures, contact center closures and workforce rationalization. The Company anticipates future
restructuring actions, where appropriate, to realize process efficiencies and to continue to align
its cost structure with business needs. The Company expects to incur severance and
severance-related costs, facilities closures costs and other costs such as inventory write-offs,
training, hiring and travel in connection with future restructuring actions.
Consolidated Operating Results
The Company has organized its businesses along three reportable segments together with a
corporate group for certain support services. The Companys operations are aligned on the basis of
products, services and industry. Management measures and evaluates the reportable segments based on
operating income.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
The operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as reflected in the
accompanying consolidated statements of income and described below, include the operating results
of the acquired Protocol IMS and SubscriberMail businesses from their respective dates of
acquisition.
Net Revenues:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
$ in millions | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Consolidated Net Revenues: |
||||||||
Harland Clarke segment |
$ | 309.7 | $ | 315.1 | ||||
Harland Financial Solutions segment |
69.3 | 69.2 | ||||||
Scantron segment |
51.1 | 54.4 | ||||||
Eliminations |
(0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 430.0 | $ | 438.6 | ||||
Net revenues decreased by $8.6 million, or 2.0%, to $430.0 million in the 2010 period from
$438.6 million in the 2009 period.
Net revenues for the Harland Clarke segment decreased by $5.4 million, or 1.7%, to $309.7
million in the 2010 period from $315.1 million in the 2009 period. The decrease was primarily a
result of volume declines in check and related products, partially offset by increased revenues per
unit and revenues from the 2009
20
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
acquisitions. Net revenues in the 2010 period included charges of $0.3 million for
non-cash fair value acquisition accounting adjustments to deferred revenue related to the
SubscriberMail acquisition.
Net revenues for the Harland Financial Solutions segment increased by $0.1 million, or 0.1%,
to $69.3 million in the 2010 period from $69.2 million in the 2009 period. Increases in maintenance
revenues and outsourced host processing revenues were substantially offset by decreases in early
termination fees and hardware sales.
Net revenues for the Scantron segment decreased by $3.3 million, or 6.1%, to $51.1 million in
the 2010 period from $54.4 million in the 2009 period. The decrease was primarily due to declines
in service maintenance, forms and hardware revenues, which the Company believes were negatively
affected by the economic downturn. These declines were partially offset by increases in revenues
from web-based products and services.
Cost of Revenues:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
$ in millions | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Consolidated Cost of Revenues: |
||||||||
Harland Clarke segment |
$ | 190.2 | $ | 200.8 | ||||
Harland Financial Solutions segment |
30.3 | 30.0 | ||||||
Scantron segment |
27.1 | 30.4 | ||||||
Eliminations |
(0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 247.5 | $ | 261.1 | ||||
Cost of revenues decreased by $13.6 million, or 5.2%, to $247.5 million in the 2010 period
from $261.1 million in the 2009 period.
Cost of revenues for the Harland Clarke segment decreased by $10.6 million, or 5.3%, to $190.2
million in the 2010 period from $200.8 million in the 2009 period. The decrease in cost of revenues
was primarily due to labor cost reductions and decreases in depreciation and occupancy expenses,
all of which resulted from restructuring activities. Additionally, lower volumes, which resulted in
lower materials and other variable overhead expenses, contributed to the decrease. Decreases in
cost of revenues were partially offset by the 2009 acquisitions and an increase in amortization
expense of $1.4 million resulting from the reclassification of the Harland Clarke tradename from an
indefinite-lived to a definite-lived intangible asset in the fourth quarter of 2009. Cost of
revenues as a percentage of revenues for the Harland Clarke segment was 61.4% in the 2010 period as
compared to 63.7% in the 2009 period.
Cost of revenues for the Harland Financial Solutions segment increased by $0.3 million, or
1.0%, to $30.3 million in the 2010 period from $30.0 million in the 2009 period. The increase in
cost of revenues was primarily due to an increase in amortization expense of $0.5 million resulting
from the reclassification of the Harland Clarke tradename from an indefinite-lived to a
definite-lived intangible asset in the fourth quarter of 2009, partially offset by labor cost
reductions resulting from restructuring activities and reductions in travel expenses. Cost of
revenues as a percentage of revenues for the Harland Financial Solutions segment was 43.7% in the
2010 period as compared to 43.4% in the 2009 period.
Cost of revenues for the Scantron segment decreased by $3.3 million, or 10.9% to $27.1 million
in the 2010 period from $30.4 million in the 2009 period. The decrease was primarily due to volume
declines and labor cost reductions resulting from restructuring activities. Cost of revenues as a
percentage of revenues for the Scantron segment was 53.0% in the 2010 period as compared to 55.9%
in the 2009 period.
21
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
$ in millions | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Consolidated Selling, General and Administrative Expenses: |
||||||||
Harland Clarke segment |
$ | 52.2 | $ | 56.1 | ||||
Harland Financial Solutions segment |
27.4 | 29.4 | ||||||
Scantron segment |
13.4 | 15.8 | ||||||
Corporate |
3.1 | 2.7 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 96.1 | $ | 104.0 | ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $7.9 million, or 7.6%, to $96.1
million in the 2010 period from $104.0 million in the 2009 period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Harland Clarke segment decreased by $3.9
million, or 7.0%, to $52.2 million in the 2010 period from $56.1 million in the 2009 period. The
decrease was primarily due to labor cost reductions resulting from restructuring activities and
reductions in selling expenses and advertising expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses from the 2009 acquisitions partially offset the overall decrease. Selling, general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues for the Harland Clarke segment were 16.9% in
the 2010 period as compared to 17.8% in the 2009 period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Harland Financial Solutions segment
decreased by $2.0 million, or 6.8%, to $27.4 million in the 2010 period from $29.4 million in the
2009 period. The decrease was primarily due to labor cost reductions resulting from restructuring
activities and decreases in travel expenses and depreciation. These decreases were partially offset
by an increase in selling expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses in the 2010 and
2009 periods included charges of $0.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively, for compensation
expense related to an incentive agreement for the Peldec assets purchase. Selling, general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues for the Harland Financial Solutions segment was
39.5% in the 2010 period as compared to 42.5% in the 2009 period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Scantron segment decreased $2.4 million,
or 15.2%, to $13.4 million in the 2010 period from $15.8 million in the 2009 period. The decrease
is primarily due to a $1.3 million one-time expense in the 2009 period related to a contractual
obligation owing to a former employee upon termination of employment and lower integration expenses
in the 2010 period. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues for
the Scantron segment was 26.2% in the 2010 period as compared to 29.0% in the 2009 period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Corporate segment increased $0.4 million,
or 14.8% to $3.1 million in the 2010 period from $2.7 million in the 2009 period related to
increases in general overhead costs.
Restructuring Costs
The Company adopted plans during 2008, 2009 and 2010 to strengthen operating margins and
leverage incremental synergies within the printing plants, contact centers and selling, general and
administrative areas by
leveraging the Companys shared services capabilities and reorganizing certain operations and
sales and support functions.
In the 2010 period, the Company recorded restructuring costs of $1.7 million for the Harland
Clarke segment, $0.2 million for the Harland Financial Solutions segment and $1.3 million for the
Scantron segment related to these plans. In the 2009 period, the Company recorded restructuring
costs of $7.3 million for the Harland Clarke segment, $2.4 million for the Harland Financial
Solutions segment and $1.4 million for the Scantron segment related to these plans.
22
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Interest Income
Interest income was $0.2 million in the 2010 period as compared to $0.3 million in the 2009
period. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to lower interest rates on investments in
cash equivalents in the 2010 period.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $29.9 million in the 2010 period as compared to $38.1 million in the 2009
period. The decrease in interest expense was largely due to lower effective interest rates, as well
as a decrease in total debt outstanding.
Gain on Early Extinguishment of Debt
During the 2009 period, the Company extinguished debt with a total principal amount of $90.5
million by purchasing 2015 Senior Notes in individually negotiated transactions for an aggregate
purchase price of $35.1 million, resulting in a gain of $52.6 million after the write-off of $2.8
million of unamortized deferred financing fees related to the extinguished debt.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate was 39.8% in the 2010 period and 38.9% in the 2009 period.
The increase was primarily due to a charge in the 2010 period for the change in federal tax law
relating to the deductibility of retiree prescription drug subsidies.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow Analysis
The Companys net cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended March
31, 2010 was $105.3 million as compared to $33.3 million during the three months ended March 31,
2009. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities of $72.0 million was due to changes
in working capital and an increase in cash flow from operations. Working capital decreased during
the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 primarily due to greater
collections on accounts receivable and the timing of payments related to other accrued expenses and
prepaid expenses.
The Companys net cash used in investing activities was $4.1 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $7.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
decrease in cash used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared
to the same period in 2009 was primarily due to lower capital expenditures, which were partially
offset by repayments on a related party note receivable.
The Companys net cash used in financing activities was $5.2 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $40.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
decrease in net cash used in financing activities was primarily due to the extinguishment of $90.5
million principal amount of 2015 Senior Notes for an aggregate purchase price of $35.1 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
The Companys Consolidated Contractual Obligations and Commitments
There were no material changes to the Companys contractual obligations and commitments as
disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 during
the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Liquidity Assessment
The Company believes that its cash and cash equivalents, borrowings available under its credit
agreement (as further discussed in Note 11 to the Companys consolidated financial statements
included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q) and anticipated cash flow from operating activities
will be sufficient to meet the Companys expected operating needs, investment and capital spending
requirements and debt service requirements for the foreseeable future.
In addition to normal operating cash, working capital requirements and service of
indebtedness, the Company also requires cash to fund capital expenditures, make contract
acquisition payments to financial institution clients and enable cost reductions through
restructuring projects as follows:
23
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
| Capital Expenditures. The Companys capital expenditures are primarily related to infrastructure investments, internally developed software, cost reduction programs, marketing initiatives and other projects that support future revenue growth. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company incurred $6.6 million and $11.8 million of capital expenditures and $0.0 million and $0.1 million of capitalized interest, respectively. | ||
| Contract Acquisition Payments. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company made $9.2 million and $12.5 million of contract acquisition payments to its clients, respectively. | ||
| Restructuring/Cost Reductions. Restructuring accruals have been established for anticipated severance payments, costs related to facilities closures and other expenses related to the planned restructuring or consolidation of some of the Companys operations. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company made $4.3 million and $9.2 million of payments for restructuring, respectively. |
The Company may also, from time to time, seek to use its cash to make acquisitions or
investments, and also to retire or purchase its outstanding debt in open market purchases, in
privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise. Such retirement or purchase of debt may be funded
from the operating cash flows of the business or other sources and will depend upon prevailing
market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors, and the
amounts involved may be material.
Cash Flow Risks
The Companys ability to meet its debt service obligations and reduce its total debt will
depend upon its ability to generate cash in the future which, in turn, will be subject to general
economic, financial, business, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other conditions, many of
which are beyond the Companys control. The Company may not be able to generate sufficient cash
flow from operations or borrow under its credit facility in an amount sufficient to repay its debt
or to fund other liquidity needs. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had $87.8 million of
availability under its revolving credit facility (after giving effect to the issuance of $12.2
million of letters of credit). The Company may also use its revolving credit facility to fund
potential future acquisitions or investments. If future cash flow from operations and other capital
resources are insufficient to pay the Companys obligations as they mature or to fund its liquidity
needs, the Company may be forced to reduce or delay business activities and capital expenditures,
sell assets, obtain additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance all or a portion
of its debt on or before maturity. The Company may not be able to accomplish any of these
alternatives on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms, if at all. In addition, the terms of the
Companys existing and future indebtedness may limit its ability to pursue any of these
alternatives.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There were no material changes to the Companys Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed
on February 26, 2010 with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which is
available on the SECs website at www.sec.gov.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as well as certain of
the Companys other public documents and statements and oral statements, contains forward-looking
statements that reflect managements current assumptions and estimates of future performance and
economic conditions. When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words believes,
anticipates, plans, expects, intends, estimates or similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such
identifying words. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. Although the Company believes that its plans, intentions and expectations
reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking statements are reasonable, such plans, intentions
or expectations may not be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are made in reliance upon the
safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company
cautions investors that any forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that
may cause actual results and future trends to differ materially from those projected, stated or
implied by the forward-looking statements. In addition, the Company encourages
24
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
investors to read the summary of the Companys critical accounting policies and estimates
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 under the
heading Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.
In addition to factors described in the Companys SEC filings and others, the following
factors could cause the Companys actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any
forward-looking statements made by the Company:
| our substantial indebtedness; | ||
| further adverse changes in or worsening of general economic and industry conditions, including the depth and length of the economic recession and higher unemployment, which could result in more rapid declines in product sales of and/or pricing pressure on the Harland Clarke and Scantron segments, and reductions in information technology budgets which could result in adverse impacts on the Harland Financial Solutions segment; | ||
| weak economic conditions and declines in the financial performance of our business that may result in material impairment charges, which could have a negative effect on the Companys earnings, total assets and market prices of the Companys outstanding securities; | ||
| our ability to generate sufficient cash in the future that affects our ability to make payments on our indebtedness; | ||
| our ability to incur substantially more debt that could exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage; | ||
| covenant restrictions under our indebtedness that may limit our ability to operate our businesses and react to market changes; | ||
| increases in interest rates; | ||
| the maturity of the paper check industry, including a faster than anticipated decline in check usage due to increasing use of alternative payment methods, decreased consumer spending and other factors and our ability to grow non-check related product lines; | ||
| consolidation among financial institutions; | ||
| adverse changes or failures or consolidation of the large financial institution clients on which we depend, resulting in decreased revenues and/or pricing pressure; | ||
| intense competition in all areas of our businesses; | ||
| our ability to successfully manage future acquisitions; | ||
| our ability to implement any or all components of our business strategy; | ||
| interruptions or adverse changes in our vendor or supplier relationships; | ||
| increased production and delivery costs; | ||
| fluctuations in the costs of raw materials and other supplies; | ||
| our ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel; | ||
| technological improvements that may reduce any advantage over other providers in our respective industries; | ||
| our ability to protect customer or consumer data against data security breaches; | ||
| changes in legislation relating to consumer privacy protection that could increase our costs or limit our future business opportunities; | ||
| contracts with our clients relating to consumer privacy protection that could restrict our business; | ||
| our ability to protect our intellectual property rights; |
25
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
| our reliance on third-party providers for certain significant information technology needs; | ||
| software defects or cyber attacks that could harm our businesses and reputation; | ||
| sales and other taxes that could have adverse effects on our businesses; | ||
| environmental risks; | ||
| the ability of our Harland Financial Solutions segment to achieve organic growth; | ||
| regulations governing the Harland Financial Solutions segment; | ||
| our ability to develop new products for our Scantron segment; | ||
| future warranty or product liability claims which could be costly to resolve and result in negative publicity; | ||
| government and school clients budget deficits, which could have an adverse impact on our Scantron segment; | ||
| softness in direct mail response rates; | ||
| lower than expected cash flow from operations; | ||
| unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations; | ||
| the loss of one of our significant customers; | ||
| work stoppages and other labor disturbances; and | ||
| unanticipated internal control deficiencies or weaknesses. |
The Company encourages investors to read carefully the risk factors described in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 in the section entitled Risk
Factors for a description of certain risks that could, among other things, cause actual results to
differ from these forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company has exposure to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency
exchange rates, which could affect its business, results of operations and financial condition. The
Company manages its exposure to these market risks through its regular operating and financing
activities.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had $1,750.5 million of term loans outstanding under its credit
agreement, $12.2 million of letters of credit outstanding under its revolving credit facility,
$206.8 million of floating rate senior notes and $271.3 million of 9.50% fixed rate senior notes.
All of these outstanding loans bear interest at variable rates, with the exception of the $271.3
million of fixed rate senior notes. Accordingly, the Company is subject to risk due to changes in
interest rates. The Company believes that a hypothetical increase of 1 percentage point in the
variable component of interest rates applicable to its floating rate debt outstanding at March 31,
2010 would have resulted in an increase in its interest expense for the three months ended March
31, 2010 of approximately $2.2 million, including the effect of the interest rate derivative
transactions discussed below.
In order to manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on a portion of the
outstanding variable rate debt, the Company entered into interest rate derivative transactions in
2007 and 2009 in the form of swaps with notional amounts totaling $855.0 million currently
outstanding as further described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These derivatives currently swap the underlying
variable rates for fixed rates ranging from 2.140% to 5.362%.
Item 7A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
presents additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures about exposure to risk in foreign
currency exchange rates. There have been no material changes to the disclosures regarding foreign
currency exchange rates as of March 31, 2010.
26
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Companys management, with the participation of
the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness
of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
27
Table of Contents
Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. and Subsidiaries
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In June 2008, Kenneth Kitson, purportedly on behalf of himself and a class of other alleged
similarly situated commercial borrowers from the Bank of Edwardsville, an Illinois-based community
bank (BOE), filed in an Illinois state court an amended complaint that re-asserted previously
filed claims against BOE and added claims against Harland Financial Solutions, Inc. (HFS). The
amended complaint alleged, among other things, that HFSs LaserPro software permitted BOE to
generate loan documents that were deceptive and usurious in that they failed to disclose properly
the effect of the 365/360 method of calculating interest. Following the removal of the action to
the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, the District Court entered
an order granting with prejudice HFSs motion to dismiss Mr. Kitsons claims. In August 2009, Mr.
Kitson, individually and as class representative, and BOE agreed to settle and dismiss with
prejudice all remaining claims. Separately but concurrently, BOEs warranty claim against HFS was
settled, in exchange for, among other things, payment by HFS of $0.2. The class settlement
agreement was approved by the District Court in January 2010.
Other commercial borrowers that have obtained loans from other banks in Illinois, Ohio and
South Carolina have commenced similar class actions against their banks using similar theories. In
some cases, the banks have made warranty claims against HFS related to these class actions. Many of
the class actions and related warranty claims are at early stages, and their likely progress is not
yet clear. The Company has not accepted any of the asserted warranty claims and does not believe
that any of these claims will result in material liability for the Company, but there can be no
assurance.
Various other legal proceedings, claims and investigations are pending against the Company,
including those relating to commercial transactions, product liability, environmental, safety and
health matters, employment matters and other matters. Most of these matters are covered by
insurance, subject to deductibles and maximum limits, and by third-party indemnities.
The Company believes that the outcome of all pending legal proceedings in the aggregate will
not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There was no material change to the Companys risk factors as disclosed in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 during the three months ended March
31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
There was no event of default upon senior securities during the three months ended March 31,
2010.
Item 5. Other Information
No additional information need be presented.
Item 6. Exhibits
31.1 | Certification of Charles T. Dawson, Chief Executive Officer, dated May 5, 2010. | |
31.2 | Certification of Peter A. Fera, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, dated May 5, 2010. |
28
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP. |
||||
Date: May 5, 2010 | By: | /s/ Peter A. Fera, Jr. | ||
Peter A. Fera, Jr. | ||||
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
||||
Date: May 5, 2010 | By: | /s/ J. Michael Riley | ||
J. Michael Riley | ||||
Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
29
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
31.1 | Certification of Charles T. Dawson, Chief Executive Officer, dated May 5, 2010. | |
31.2 | Certification of Peter A. Fera, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, dated May 5, 2010. |