Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32 - ITRACKR SYSTEMS INC | v180773_ex32.htm |
EX-31 - ITRACKR SYSTEMS INC | v180773_ex31.htm |
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the transition period from _____________________ to ______________
Commission
File Number: 000-52934
ITRACKR
SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact
name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Florida
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or
organization)
|
|
05-0597678
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
475 Plaza Real, Suite 275
Boca Raton, FL 33432
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(561)
962-4111
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x
No ¨
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company.
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting
company x
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
There
were 19,827,331 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 30,
2010. The registrant’s common stock is not traded or listed on any
exchange.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference: None.
EXPLANATORY
NOTE
On
January 12, 2010, the Company closed a merger transaction (the “Merger”)
pursuant to which it (i) became the 100% parent of iTrackr, Inc., a Florida
corporation (“iTrackr”), (ii) assumed the operations of iTrackr, and (iii)
changed its name from Must Haves, Inc. to iTrackr Systems, Inc. The Company
reported the closing of the Merger in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2010. This Annual Report
on Form 10-K contains information regarding the Company and iTrackr, as
indicated herein.
Since the
Merger closed subsequent to the reporting period covered by this Annual Report
on Form 10-K, this report includes both discussion of our business as it existed
as of December 31, 2009 and of the Company’s business post-Merger, as the 100%
parent of iTrackr, to ensure that the disclosure included herein is complete and
not misleading. The sections entitled “Must Haves, Inc.” describe the Company
prior to January 19, 2010 and the sections entitled “iTrackr Systems, Inc.” describe the Company on
and after January 19, 2010.
ITRACKR
SYSTEMS, INC.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
ITEM
|
PAGE
|
|||
PART
I
|
||||
Item
1
|
Business
|
1
|
||
Item
1A
|
Risk
Factors
|
10
|
||
Item
1B
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
10
|
||
Item
2
|
Properties
|
10
|
||
Item
3
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
11
|
||
Item
4
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
11
|
||
PART
II
|
||||
Item
5
|
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
11
|
||
Item
6
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
14
|
||
Item
7
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
14
|
||
Item
7A
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
20
|
||
Item
8
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
20
|
||
Item
9
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
20
|
||
Item
9A
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
20
|
||
Item
9B
|
Other
Information
|
22
|
||
PART
III
|
||||
Item
10
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
22
|
||
Item
11
|
Executive
Compensation
|
24
|
||
Item
12
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
26
|
||
Item
13
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
27
|
||
Item
14
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
28
|
||
PART
IV
|
||||
Item
15
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
29
|
||
SIGNATURES
|
31
|
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The
information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including in the
documents incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
includes some statements that are not purely historical and that are
“forward-looking statements.” Such forward-looking statements include, but are
not limited to, statements regarding the Company and its management’s
expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future,
including its financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any
statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of
future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are
forward-looking statements. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “continue,”
“could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plans,” “possible,”
“potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “seeks,” “should,” “will,” “would” and
similar expressions, or the negatives of such terms, may identify
forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a
statement is not forward-looking.
The
forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are
based on current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and the
potential effects on the parties and the transaction. There can be no assurance
that future developments actually affecting the Company will be those
anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks,
uncertainties (some of which are beyond the parties’ control) or other
assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially
different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements,
including the following:
|
·
|
our ability to maintain and
increase revenues and sales of our
products;
|
|
·
|
our ability to develop and market
new products;
|
|
·
|
competitive nature of our
industry;
|
|
·
|
market acceptance of our
products;
|
|
·
|
our reliance on intellectual
property, some of which is owned by third
parties;
|
|
·
|
our strategic investments and
acquisitions;
|
|
·
|
continued maintenance of
certificates, permits and licenses required to conduct
business;
|
|
·
|
vulnerability of our business to
general economic downturn;
and
|
|
·
|
the other factors referenced in
this prospecuts, including, without limitation, under the sections
entitled “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and
“Business.”
|
These
risks and uncertainties, along with others, are also described below under the
heading “Risk Factors.” Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties
materialize, or should any of the parties’ assumptions prove incorrect, actual
results may vary in material respects from those projected in these
forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable
securities laws.
PART I
ITEM
1. BUSINESS.
MUST
HAVES, INC.
Overview
The
Company is in the business of designing and manufacturing ladies apparel
accessories consisting of beaded and jeweled bra straps that hook or snap into
traditional bras, camisoles and tank tops. Our products are made by hand with
high quality plastic, crystal and imitation gemstone beads. The beads are
threaded one at a time on a rubber string that acts in place of a typical bra
strap. We place a hook at the end of each strap to secure into a regular or
strapless bra. Due to demand and the labor intensive nature of hand beading each
strap, the Company outsources manufacturing to one or more just in time
manufacturing facilities in the Philippines. The beads, crystals and other
materials we use are available from numerous domestic and foreign sources with
which we have no long-term purchase commitments or exclusive
contracts.
The bra
straps are designed by Stella Gostfrand and marketed under “Jewelry For Your
Shoulders” and the registered trademarks, “Straps By Stella G.” (Serial Number
78511966/Registration Number 3092474) and “Stella G.” (Serial Number
78512023/Registration Number 3092475). We have not applied for federal
registration of the mark “Jewelry For Your Shoulders”. No registration is
required in order to establish rights to a trademark and we believe we have
obtained unlimited common law trademark rights through actual use of the mark in
connection with our business for as long as we use the mark. However, we may
lose common law rights over time if we stop using the mark, another party
establishes superior common law or statutory rights in the mark through use or
registration, or the mark falls into the public domain due to many other parties
using the mark.
From
August 2004 to March 2005, we were involved in a limited joint venture with
lingerie manufacturer On Gossamer that featured “Straps by Stella G.” on On
Gossamer lingerie products sold in Bloomingdales, Nordstroms and Macy’s. Our
limited joint venture with On Gossamer terminated in March 2005. Our products
are currently sold in more than 50 local and national boutiques spread out all
over the country and are also sold in Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Texas and
Canada through non-exclusive representatives. The boutiques that purchase our
products are generally small, trendy, specialty shops that cater to the fashion
conscience consumer. Orders from boutiques and representatives are open purchase
orders and, generally, are processed, manufactured and delivered C.O.D. to the
boutique or representative within 5-7 business days of receipt of the purchase
order. We are not dependent on any single boutique or representative and no
single boutique or representative accounts for 10% or more of our revenue. Our
products are sold at wholesale to boutiques and through non exclusive
representatives who receive a commission of 20% on retail
purchases.
Competition
The
women’s apparel accessories market is highly competitive due to the low cost of
raw materials and low market entry costs. The growth opportunities within the
women’s apparel and accessories market has encouraged the entry of many new
competitors, ranging from local artisans to a few large, well known and
established specialty retailers. We compete with small, localized boutique
designers selling similar products in retail stores, but the majority of our
competitors offer similar products through a variety of websites. Our
competition also includes small to large manufacturers including our former
joint collaborator, On Gossamer, which developed a line of similar straps once
our relationship terminated in March 2005. These types of competitors generally
distribute product to accessory retailers of all sizes and traditional
department store retailers.
We
believe our primary competitors are considerably larger and/or have
substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources; however, we are
not aware of any competitor that is using print or other media to advertise
similar products or to direct consumers to their websites or retail outlets.
Although our competitors are numerous and range in size, we believe that our
products stand due to the unique designs and higher quality of the materials we
use to manufacture our straps.
1
We expect
there to be fluctuations in our net sales from quarter to quarter, with the
highest net sales generally coming just before summer and during the end of the
year holiday season in the second and fourth quarters of our fiscal
year.
Employees
We do not
currently have any employees other than Stella Gostfrand, our sole officer and
director. We do not have any employment or compensation agreements in place with
Mrs. Gostfrand although she is reimbursed for expenditures advanced on
behalf of the Company.
ITRACKR
SYSTEMS, INC.
Overview
We are an
emerging ecommerce software and services company. In 2006, we began development
of an online search application for retailers and consumers and launched www.itrackr.com,
a social networking website designed to enable consumers the ability to search
for products and services at brick-and-mortar retail stores on location-based,
and inventory-available basis, within their geographic communities. In 2009, we
acquired online customer support software from ChatStat, which enables us to
provide retailers with a support and sales tool for agents with the goal of
increasing transactional business. We serve customers primarily in North America
in a variety of industries with a particular emphasis on ecommerce
markets.
Corporate
Information
We were
incorporated in the State of Wyoming on May 10, 2006 to develop, market and
commercialize a product and inventory search application through a social
networking site designed to leverage the best of Internet and mobile
technologies.
On
November 27, 2007 we adopted Articles of Merger to merger iTrackr, the Wyoming
corporation with and into iTrackr, Inc., a Florida corporation. On
December 10, 2009, we entered into a Plan of Merger with Must Haves, Inc.
which closed on January 12, 2010 pursuant to which (i) we received an aggregate
of 17,875,695 shares, or 93.5% of Must Haves, Inc. common stock, and (ii) Must
Haves, Inc. assumed 6,555,000 options and warrants of iTrackr, which are
exercisable at prices from $0.01 to $0.40. Our corporate offices are located at
475 Plaza Real, Suite 275 Boca Raton, Fl, and our telephone number is (561)
962-4111.
With
respect to this discussion, the terms “we”, “our”, “iTrackr” and the “Company”
refer to iTrackr Systems, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, iTrackr,
Inc..
Industry
Chat
and Online Customer Support
Despite
the current state of the U.S. economy, online sales are still strong. In a
February 2009 forecast, Forrester Research, Inc. projected that online sales
will increase by 11% in 2009, reaching $156 billion by year’s end, and that
affluent shoppers (defined as consumers with household incomes of at least
$75,000 per year), who account for more than half of online retail spending,
will continue to shift a significant portion of their purchases to the Web
channel.
We
believe that the online channel presents expansion opportunities for many
industries, and that the increased e-commerce revenue that results from this
expansion may outweigh the decrease that stems from consumers who will curtail
their overall spending in 2009. To survive in this competitive environment,
e-businesses must differentiate their service, quality and overall experience to
gain customer loyalty.
Forrester
also forecasts online banking adoption will continue its upward trajectory.
According to Forrester’s figures, by 2011 the number of U.S. consumers who bank
online will grow by 55%, representing 76% of online households.
2
Online
advertising continues to grow, with search engine-based marketing leading the
way. We believe the shift from television, print, radio and other traditional
media may accelerate in a recessionary environment largely because Web-based
media is more measurable, interactive, targeted and relevant. eMarketer, in an
article published in December 2008, predicts that search engine-based marketing
will grow 15% to $12 billion in 2009, while overall online advertising will grow
9% to $26 billion. This compares to the total U.S. advertising market for 2009,
which Barclays Capital Media predicts will decline by 10% to $251
billion.
The
unrivaled convenience, accessibility and selection of the Web have established
the channel as a mass consumer medium. Because the Internet is a ubiquitous
influence in our day-to-day lives, consumer expectations and demands continue to
rise.
By
supplying online engagement tools that facilitate real-time assistance and
personalized advice, iTrackr enables businesses and individual service providers
to connect with their target audience, as well as provide personalized customer
assistance to high-value customers. Creating more relevant, compelling and
personalized online experiences, our platform helps e-business organizations
meet the needs of demanding consumers while reinforcing their brand
promise.
Social
Networking
Social
technologies continue to grow substantially in 2009. Forrester Research reports
that now more than four in five US online adults use social media at least once
a month, and half participate in social networks like Facebook, which estimates
to have 300 million active users, of whom half log in on any given day, and
of which more than 65 million users access through mobile
devices.
By the
year 2013, 43% of global mobile internet users (607.5 million people worldwide)
will be accessing social networks from their mobile devices, according to
eMarketer, which characterizes mobile and social as still-emerging channels that
are each helping drive the adoption of the other. In the US, mobile social
networkers will total 56.2 million by 2013, and will account for nearly
half (45%) of the mobile internet user population.
Social
networking has dramatically reshaped the Internet landscape and is now
generating more than $1 billion annually. Industry giants such as Microsoft and
Google continue to court these social networking sites with the intention toward
establishing the mechanism for monetizing advertising content.
Mobile
data services (e.g. text messaging, ringtones, wallpaper) have become a hundred
billion dollar business worldwide. ABI Research estimates that between 2008 and
2014, the total market for mobile messaging will grow at a CAGR of nearly 8
percent, increasing from $132 billion in 2008 to $208 billion by
2014.
According
to a recent CTIA survey, text messaging continues to be enormously popular, with
more than one trillion text messages carried on carriers’ networks in
2008—breaking down to more than 3.5 billion messages per day. That’s almost
triple the number from 2007, when 363 billion text messages were
transmitted. Wireless subscribers are also sending more pictures and other
multi-media messages with their mobile devices, with 15 billion MMS messages
reported for 2008, up from 6 billion the year before.
Competitive
Strengths
Experienced
management team
Our
senior management team has extensive business and industry experience, including
an understanding of changing market trends, consumer needs and technologies,
which gives us the ability to capitalize on the opportunities resulting from
these market changes. Our Chief Executive Officer, John Rizzo, has
over 15 years of experience in developing technology
businesses. Other members of our senior management team also have
significant experience with respect to key aspects of our operations, including
research and development, product design, and sales and
marketing.
3
Early
market mover
We were
the first to market in the “Buy-Online, Pick-Up-In-Store” category, which we
believe has enabled us to build strong brand value.
Open
Source Technology
We have
developed the iTrackr platform based on an “Opensource Architecture” much the
same way as Facebook, Google, Yahoo, Youtube and other fast growing internet
companies. This architecture enables us to quickly to scale our
infrastructure to adapt to a rapidly growing user/customer base and to integrate
with retailers API as most source code is readily available.
Mobility
We are
the only company in the space that relies heavily on mobile computing. We
are the only company using SMS to enable the end user for increased
mobility. We estimate that 25% of all messages sent through the iTrackr
platform are SMS. We are also developing mobile and GPS-enabled
applications to continue to dominate in this space.
Our
Strategy
iTrackr
Technologies has built a community-driven website at www.itrackr.com where
consumers can create user-generated content focused on feedback and
recommendations about popular products. What is truly unique about our website
is that the users all have something in common; they are confirmed consumers.
They have found www.itrackr.com
because they are looking for one item or another in their local shopping area
for immediate purchase. Since our initial launch, in December 2006, we increased
our membership 170,000 subscribers solely through viral, word-of-mouth
marketing.
In
addition to our web presence we are working with retailers to extend iTrackr’s
fulfillment tracking applications to their branded web sites. Our mobile suite
of applications are also extensible with our commercial partners’ look and feel,
giving them an iTrackr enabled mobile presence under their existing corporate
brand. We will augment our offering with transaction settlement capabilities to
compliment our existing capabilities and provide our partners with a complete
fulfillment solution.
Our
initial objective is to reach critical mass as quickly as possible in order to
establish the iTrackr Community as viable and attractive to marketing firms and
online and mobile advertisers. We will achieve critical mass when revenue from
our Community presence approaches our current cost of operations. We intend to
leverage our suite of applications over wired and mobile devices in order to
achieve the broadest possible uptake and the greatest potential market
penetration.
We have
employed a “freemium” model to maximize consumer uptake for our social shopping
tools. In other words, we offer product tracking and notification, as well as
the consumer social network capabilities to our users and members without a
charge. We believe this will provide us with the most efficient path to
establishing critical mass and validation of our offering.
We
believe that our user base will be driven by the content that we propagate to
our iTrackr database, the number of consumers that will employ mobile data
applications, and more generally mirror the broader online consumer demographic.
Our strategy is to populate our database initially with the most sought after,
or the “hottest” consumer products, demand for which is generated by the
community members themselves. This category of products is, by nature, more
difficult to locate in-store due to the fact that demand is higher. These will
be the products which will highlight the value of our offering to the consumer,
and create the largest viral “buzz” amongst all consumers. Around the holidays,
these hot items are typically new releases of consumer electronics, games and
communications devices, but can be any consumer good or service for which supply
is constrained regionally or nationally.
Over
time, other factors will contribute to the products available for tracking on
our network, including consumer user-generation of product tracking requests as
well as our development of partnerships and affiliation with retail and
marketing firms.
4
With more
than a quarter of online consumers submitting a rating or review of a product or
service contributing to a discussion board, an increasing number of brands are
beginning to use user generated content to engage with customers, while social
networking sites that employ UCGP are demonstrating growth in site traffic and
membership numbers.
We have
developed the iTrackr platform to scale on a distributed basis, where consumers
have the capability to add products for tracking, as well as for reviews and
commentary to propagate within our community. We are seeking to maximize the
relevance of the tracking services, while increasing the likelihood of longer
and more frequent site visits. This increases the attractiveness of our site as
a merchandising destination for online advertisers and marketing
firms.
Our plan
for 2010 is to grow by promoting our mobile networking tools and retail search
capabilities to community and affinity groups that will benefit the most from
mobile social networking. These groups include retailers, students, affinity
groups and mobile device manufacturers. By soliciting participation from retail
sponsors, we will provide free services to our target communities.
Viral
Promotion Strategy
iTrackr
has been lauded on websites and in the media with no direct marketing
expenditures or outlays on our behalf. For example, U.S. News & World
Report mentioned the iTrackr service on December 6, 2007, within the
context of “Tracking the Elusive Wii”. Almost immediately after we made our
application available on the world wide web, mention of our service and positive
reviews appeared on Google searches for the term iTrackr. We will continue to
promote our community virally, and will expand our blog presence for the
foreseeable future.
Consumer
Reach Strategy
Today
most consumers utilizing iTrackr do so for products that can be found and
purchased at their local store. Our new product offerings will allow consumers
to form private communities and to exchange group messages or discuss things
within groups of their making. By offering these features, we extend the
consumers ability to seek fulfillment for services as well as goods. These
services include event ticketing such as movie tickets, concerts or sporting
events, and they will also include packages combining events with merchandise
and entertainment. iTrackr’s messaging and community products will offer
consumer’s the ability to organize the events in a one step process including
the purchase of the service via the Internet. This can occur from any Internet
or mobile device.
Retailer
Promotion Strategy
We intend
to solicit commercial participation from big box consumer electronics and
pharmaceutical retailers, but our service is not limited to any particular set
of retail categories. Consider the following examples:
Pharmaceutical Retailer: we
provide the retailer with the ability to notify customers via text message or
email that their prescription has been filled and is available for pickup. With
these highly-qualified messages, we can extend the retailers the ability to
offer special coupons or exclusive promotional opportunities. By combining our
service with an exclusive marketing opportunity, we will drive derivative sales
from the subsequent store visit by the consumer.
Electronic Retailer: our
utilities give retailers the ability to notify their customers that a product at
a particular location has become available, and iTrackr will facilitate the
transaction. In addition, the retailer can drive additional sales by offering
additional incentives or bundles when the customer visits the store to purchase
the originally tracked item. We have identified several major retailers with
whom we have engaged or intend to engage. These include Best Buy, Target, Radio
Shack, Circuit City and Costco. Additionally, other retail areas will be pursued
as commercial adoption grows. These secondary retailers include book stores such
as Barnes & Noble and manufacturing retailers such as
Apple.
5
Mobile
Supply Chain Distribution
Making
iTrackr an integral part of the mobile technology supply chain is one of our
ultimate, long-term goals. Strategically placing the iTrackr Community button on
mobile devices gives us one of the strongest opportunities to extend our
community brand. Placement on the deck of PDA’s and cell phones will give us a
true advantage in the marketplace. Developing relationships with manufacturers
and service providers will allow us to pursue this goal, and having service
providers as commercial partners will only further strengthen our offerings to
potential subscribers. Even one partner in this arena greatly expands our reach
and brand presence to a broad consumer group. Those consumers will drive new
communities to the iTrackr offering and further expand mobile social networking
in today’s wireless world.
Products
and Services
The
iTrackr community brand has created one of the first mobile shopping communities
which is fully integrated with the online and mobile world. Our community
bridges cyberspace and the mobile space with the real world for the benefit of
our users, retailers and merchants. iTrackr is recognized nationally for
locating hard to find products and major media organizations such as U.S. News
and World Report, The Wall Street Journal and CNET have consulted with us for
reference retail statistics.
Our
current product line consists of our online Chat customer support application,
“TrackiT!”, “PriceiT!”, Groups, Calendar and status update messaging for mobile
and Internet.
Customer
Support and Chat Software
Bridging
the gap between visitor traffic and successful business outcomes, our business
solutions deliver measurable return on investment by enabling clients
to:
|
·
|
Increase
conversion rates and reduce abandonment by selectively engaging website
visitors;
|
|
·
|
Accelerate
the sales cycle, drive repeat business and increase average order
values;
|
|
·
|
Increase
customer satisfaction, retention and loyalty while reducing service
costs;
|
|
·
|
Harness
the knowledge of subject-matter experts by allowing consumers to engage
with major online brands ;
|
|
·
|
Refine
and improve performance by understanding which initiatives deliver the
highest rate; and
|
|
·
|
Lower
operating costs in the call center by deflecting costly phone and email
interactions.
|
TrackiT,
PriceiT and iTrackr Community Applications
These
products are based on a “pull/push” model where the consumers tell us what
products they are interested in via the Retail “TrackiT!” button and iTrackr
pulls the information from the retailers’ inventory and pushes it to the
consumer. The consumer establishes their messaging preferences of site only,
mobile text messaging and/or email. The main product is the “TrackiT!” function
which allows consumers to search local stores’ inventory for products like the
Wii Console, Guitar Hero video game as well as a host of other
products.
Our
products are focused on creating value by and to the consumer, the retailer and
the marketing firm. The success of our business is predicated on our ability to
effectively achieve and maximize value on each of these fronts.
Our
business and technology was created first and foremost with the individual
consumer, and the consumer’s “interests” in mind. More than ever, consumers are
challenged with issues of time and convenience in fulfilling their purchases.
This factor has been one of the primary catalysts for the growth of online
shopping which addresses both of these constraints directly. But the fact is,
that online commerce remains less than 10% of total retail, and is forecast to
only reach about 13.4% of total retail by 2011. Tracking and utilizing the
expressed interests of our users allows us to maintain our relevance to the
consumer and to provide information that keeps them engaged with our
Community.
6
The vast
majority of consumers are committed to fulfilling their shopping purchases at
brick-and-mortar locations. This creates another significant inconvenience, or
“pain”, for the consumer – namely, the need to find the product they are looking
for in stock and in their area now. We believe that the best solution, or
resolution, for the consumer’s need is to help them mitigate and eliminate
altogether the hassle of locating stores that have the products they want in
stock and to provide them with an opportunity to secure that in-stock product
with an immediate purchase. We leverage the power and ubiquitous nature of the
Internet and mobile marketplace to provide this intelligence to the consumer in
an on-demand, real-time capability. After all, while less than 10% of consumers
will execute a purchase online, almost 90% of them are researching online. We
simplify the process in a turnkey fashion and with immediate
resolution.
The value
proposition that we offer to the retailer is equally compelling. We drive
purchases to the retailer. Our presence and content will greatly influence where
our users fulfill their transactions. Our powerful e-commerce driven, social
networking platform cost-effectively pushes consumers that are ready to purchase
to retail locations. Retailer’s can market incentives and promotions on a local
and even store-by-store basis to our consumers. That is the essence of social
merchandising. iTrackr can provide layers of intelligence to retailers that can
be parsed all-the-way down to the zip-code layer. The implications to the
retailer range well beyond target marketing and extend directly to inventory
management, fulfillment and settlement in the consumer supply
chain.
Substantiating
“return-on-investment remains the biggest challenge for marketing firms catering
to online advertisers. Much of the problem online advertisers face is related to
the measurement tools currently available and the data which is ultimately
produced from those tools. Additionally, it is also difficult to determine the
quality of placement and the impact of advertising amongst the online audience
at a particular destination. The vast majority of advertising dollars being
spent is concentrated on a surprisingly few online destinations.
The
primary advantage that we offer marketing firms is the assurance that the ads
and promotional campaigns launched within the iTrackr Community are both highly
targeted and are being sought by the confirmed consumers that are at our site
first and foremost for retail interests. This is a significant advantage and a
key differentiator from other platforms. We believe that marketing firms can
more effectively demonstrate ROI to their clients on our platform, and we can
provide them with the statistics to prove it.
We are
working with our commercial partners to provide inventory and service tracking
functions within the branded image of their existing online presence. This is
the fundamental building block of social merchandising. From these services, our
Retail partners will extend product and service fulfillment messaging with
derivative sales offerings, associated mobile advertising and mobile couponing.
iTrackr subscriber’s will benefit from brand affinity offerings through our
Retailers’ partners.
Transaction
Fulfillment
Consumers
can complete the process of searching for products and services by securing them
with a “BuyiT!” purchase when they locate what they want. Goods and services can
be secured when they become available, and the consumer will know that their
products will be waiting for them when they go to pick them up.
Group
Messaging
Consumers
can communicate or forward received messages to any of their groups, regardless
of which devices they are using, where each member receives messages according
to their individual profiles and permissions that they have established.
Retailers can leverage this group messaging functionality to push special offers
and incentives to relevant groups, notifying them of brick-and-mortar locations
where they can locate products and take advantage of special
offers.
MyiTrackr
Dashboard
When a
community member signs in, their home page is also their personal dashboard.
Whether from the web or from the mobile device, the MyiTrackr Personal Dashboard
is the interface to the world of iTrackr services. From a user’s personal
dashboard they can personalize and configure their view of the iTrackr
community. From here they can set up their communications settings, their group
affiliations and their personal preferences. Community members can research
subscriber submitted opinions of products and services, or they may wish to
submit reviews of their own. The MyiTrackr Personal Dashboard is the member’s
one-stop for personalization of the iTrackr Community
experience.
7
iTrackr
Trackit Reports
iTrackr’s
TrackiT Reports provide commercial subscribers with invaluable data provided by
the iTrackr consumer. We have unique insight into the purchasing trends of
groups of consumers by product. When a community member stops tracking a
product, we glean specific information about the retail experience, and while we
never release specific user information, we can aggregate very specific
information about consumer behavior. As our membership grows many consumer
trends can be noted and quantified. iTrackr TrackiT Reports are the only place
where that data can be found.
Research
and Development
Companies
such as us are under pressure for customers to respond more quickly with new
designs and product innovations to support rapidly changing consumer tastes and
regulatory requirements. We believe that the engineering and
technical expertise of our management and key personnel, together with our
emphasis on continuing research and development, allows us to efficiently and
timely identify and bring new, innovative products to market for our customers
using the latest technologies, materials and processes. We believe
that continued research and development activities are critical to maintaining
our offering of technologically-advanced products to serve a broader array of
our customers.
We focus
our product design efforts on both improving our existing products and
developing new products. In an effort to enhance our product quality,
reduce costs and keep up with emerging product trends, we work with our key
customers to identify emerging product trends and implement new solutions
intended to meet the current and future needs of the markets we
serve.
We are a
technology company, and approximately 45% of our costs are related to research
and development. We anticipate that research and development costs will continue
to be a material component of our overall business expenditures for the
foreseeable future.
Competition
Chat
and Online Customer Support
The
markets for online engagement technology and online consumer services are
intensely competitive and characterized by aggressive marketing, evolving
industry standards, rapid technology developments, and frequent new product
introductions.
Our
business solutions compete directly with companies focused on technology that
facilitate real-time sales, email management, searchable knowledgebase
applications and customer service interaction. These markets remain fairly
saturated with small companies that compete on price and features. iTrackr faces
competition from online interaction solution providers, including
software-as-a-service (SaaS) providers such as LivePerson, Art Technology Group,
Instant Service, RightNow Technologies and TouchCommerce. We face potential
competition from Web analytics and online marketing service providers, such as
Omniture. The most significant barriers to entry in this market are knowledge
of:
|
·
|
Online
consumer purchasing habits;
|
|
·
|
Methodologies
to correctly engage customers;
|
|
·
|
Metrics
proving return on investment; and
|
|
·
|
Technology
innovation opportunities.
|
iTrackr
also faces potential competition from larger enterprise software companies such
as Oracle and SAP. In addition, established technology and/or consumer-oriented
companies such as Microsoft, Yahoo and Google may leverage their existing
relationships and capabilities to offer online engagement solutions that
facilitate real-time assistance and live advice.
8
Finally,
iTrackr competes with in-house online engagement solutions, as well as, to a
lesser extent, traditional offline customer service solutions, such as telephone
call centers.
iTrackr
believes that competition will increase as our current competitors increase the
sophistication of their offerings and as new participants enter the market.
Compared to iTrackr, some of our larger current and potential competitors
have:
|
·
|
Stronger
brand recognition;
|
|
·
|
A
wider range of products and services;
and
|
|
·
|
Greater
financial, marketing and research and development
resources.
|
Additionally,
some competitors may enter into strategic or commercial relationships with
larger, more established and better-financed companies, enabling them
to:
|
·
|
Undertake
more extensive marketing campaigns;
|
|
·
|
Adopt
more aggressive pricing policies;
and
|
|
·
|
Make
more attractive offers to businesses to induce them to use their products
or services.
|
Social
Networking and Online Retail Search
While our
business concept is unique, our revenue streams come from intensely competitive
markets. Our users can find, buy, sell and pay for similar items and services
through a variety of competing channels. These include, but are not limited to,
online and offline retailers, distributors, liquidators, import and export
companies, catalog and mail-order companies, classifieds, directories, search
engines, products of search engines, virtually all online and offline commerce
participants (consumer-to-consumer, business-to-consumer and
business-to-business), online and offline shopping channels and networks. As our
product offerings continue to broaden into new categories of items and new
commerce formats, we expect our competition to continue to broaden to include
other online and offline channels for those new offerings.
Whether
it is driving product sales to traditional businesses or providing targeted
marketing opportunities for derivative sales to a retailer’s consumer, iTrackr
is in the business of social merchandizing. Other social networking ventures,
such as MySpace and Facebook have seen tremendous growth over the last four
years in terms of the user community. Facebook has garnered 200 million
users worldwide and My Space reportedly has more than 100 million users.
These numbers are impressive for building social networking destinations, but
the business behind these offerings still relies on revenue primarily derived
from online advertising. Facebook has reported to investors that it could
generate revenues as high as $500 million in 2009, after generating between $280
and $300 million in 2008. iTrackr competes with these, and other larger and more
established social networking sites for users, but we believe we are well
positioned to excel at per subscriber revenue generation given our multi-channel
approach to revenue generation. The major difference between iTrackr and sites
like Facebook or MySpace is that they offer blogs and pictures, and we focus on
consumers and merchandising.
Other
competitors include social shopping sites. Hearst Corporation acquired Kaboodle
for an estimated $40 million. Kaboodle is one of the new social shopping sites
started in the last few years. They had managed to grow their site to
2.2 million unique visitors by June 2007, prior to being purchased. Several
social shopping sites focus on a specific community segment. Stylehive is vying
to become a destination for women’s fashion. Crowdstorm is focusing exclusively
on online shopping. All of these sites are looking to establish a niche
community with retail extensions. Very few offerings have direct queries of
existing retailers, and none have in-stock checking or sell through capabilities
with existing retailers. iTrackr does complete point-of-sale transactions, and
provides sell through capabilities to our commercial partners.
A key
differentiator of our offering is our focus on mobile social networking and
merchandizing. Most mobile offerings only tie into existing sites like MySpace.
An example of this is the mobile offering from Earthlink and SK Telecom called
Helio. This is a premium service requiring a specific device and running as much
as $135 per month. While Helio is going after the premium content consumer, the
remainder of the mobile marketplace is unserved. iTrackr will change that with
our mobile community. A wide variety of mobile devices work with our community
utilities, and the service does not come with a premium price
tag.
9
We are a
commerce facilitator. With other eCommerce sites, when you buy a product, you
have to wait for fulfillment which often takes weeks. Our service is designed
for consumers that want products today. Our consumers want to know where they
can find a product, if it is available and what is the best price for the
product. This is our service offering, and this is what both differentiates us
from eCommerce stores and what enables us to serve as a partner to brick and
mortar retailers.
Another
key differentiator of our service from others, is that we proactively notify
consumers when products or services that they are looking for become available
and from where. We are not a retailer, so we do not compete directly with other
retailers. Rather, we support them. iTrackr identifies groups of people who are
looking for a product or service, and we provide opportunities for our
commercial partners to fulfill their need. We identify further opportunities for
retailers to take advantage of derivative sales opportunities when the right mix
of consumer interest, product availability and pending purchase come
together.
Intellectual
Property
We do not
own, either legally or beneficially, any patents or trademarks.
Some of
our products are also designed to include software or other intellectual
property licensed from third parties. While it may be necessary in
the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of our products
and business methods, based on past experience and industry practice we believe
that such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable
terms. However, there is no guarantee that such licenses could be
obtained at all. Because of technological changes in the portable
electronics industry, current extensive patent coverage and the rapid rate of
issuance of new patents, it is possible certain components of our products may
unknowingly infringe existing patents or intellectual property rights of
others.
Government
Regulation
There are
an increasing number of laws and regulations pertaining to the Internet and
e-commerce over the Internet. Other laws or regulations may be adopted with
respect to online content regulation, user privacy, pricing, restrictions on
email solicitations, taxation and quality of products and services. Any new
legislation or regulation, or the application or interpretation of existing
laws, may decrease the growth in the use of the Internet, which could in turn
decrease the demand for our service, increase our cost of doing business or
otherwise have a material adverse effect on our prospects and
revenues.
Employees
At March
30, we had 3 full-time employees. There are no collective bargaining
contracts covering any of our employees. We believe our relationship
with our employees is satisfactory.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS.
Not
Required.
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
Not
applicable.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES.
The
following table summarizes the location of real properties leased by us. We
entered into a lease agreement with Regus in February 2009, where the initial
term was for a three month period through April 2009. According to the terms of
the lease agreement, the lease extends automatically for successive periods
equal to the initial term but no less than 3 months (or such other renewal term
that has been agreed between Regus and us) until brought to an end by us or
Regus.
10
Our lease
is for a property located at 433 Plaza Road, Ste 275, Boca Raton Florida for a
fee of $800 per month.
We
believe our facilities are currently suitable and adequate for our current
needs.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
There are
not any material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or as
to which any of its property is subject, and no such proceedings are known to
the Company to be threatened or contemplated against it.
ITEM
4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
PART II
ITEM
5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
MUST
HAVES, INC.
Market
Information
The
Company’s common stock is not traded on any stock exchange. The
Company is not aware of any market activity in its common stock since its
inception through the date of this filing.
Holders
As of
December 31, 2009, there were 54 record holders of 4,975,000 shares of our
common stock.
Dividends
The
Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends on common stock and does not
intend to declare or pay any cash dividend in the foreseeable future. The
payment of dividends, if any, is within the discretion of the board of directors
and will depend on the Company’s earnings, if any, its capital requirements and
financial condition and such other factors as the board of directors may
consider.
ITRACKR
SYSTEMS, INC.
Market
Information
There has
never been a public trading market for our common stock and our shares of common
stock are not currently listed or quoted for trading on any national securities
exchange or national quotation system. We intend to apply for our
shares to be traded on the over-the-counter bulletin board
(“OTCBB”).
If and
when our common stock is quoted for trading, the price of our common stock will
likely fluctuate in the future. The stock market in general has experienced
extreme stock price fluctuations in the past few years. In some cases, these
fluctuations have been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected
companies. Many companies have experienced dramatic volatility in the market
prices of their common stock. We believe that a number of factors, both within
and outside our control, could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate,
perhaps substantially. Factors such as the following could have a significant
adverse impact on the market price of our common stock:
|
·
|
Our
ability to obtain additional financing and, if available, the terms and
conditions of the financing;
|
|
·
|
Our
financial position and results of
operations;
|
11
|
·
|
Concern
as to, or other evidence of, the reliability and efficiency of our
proposed products and services to our competitors’ products and
services;
|
|
·
|
Announcements
of innovations or new products or services by us or our
competitors;
|
|
·
|
Federal
and state governmental regulatory actions and the impact of such
requirements on our business;
|
|
·
|
The
development of litigation against
us;
|
|
·
|
Period-to-period
fluctuations in our operating
results;
|
|
·
|
Changes
in estimates of our performance by any securities
analysts;
|
|
·
|
The
issuance of new equity securities pursuant to a future offering or
acquisition;
|
|
·
|
Changes
in interest rates;
|
|
·
|
The
issuance of new equity securities pursuant to a future offering or
acquisition;
|
|
·
|
Changes
in interest rates;
|
|
·
|
Competitive
developments, including announcements by competitors of new products or
services or significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships,
joint ventures or capital
commitments;
|
|
·
|
Investor
perceptions of our Company; and
|
|
·
|
General
economic and other national
conditions.
|
Holders
As of
March 30, 2010, we had 97 stockholders of record of 19,827,331 shares of our
common stock.
Dividends
We do not
expect to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the
foreseeable future, and we currently intend to retain future earnings, if any,
to finance the expansion of our business. The decision whether to pay cash
dividends on our common stock will be made by our board of directors, in their
discretion, and will depend on our financial condition, operating results,
capital requirements and other factors that the board of directors considers
significant. We did not pay cash dividends in the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Transfer
Agent
The
transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Manhattan Transfer
Registrar Company.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights
|
Weighted – average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
|
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuances
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
|
||||||||||
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
||||||||||
Equity
Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders
|
-0- | n/a | -0- | |||||||||
Equity
Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders (1)
|
-0- | n/a | 45,250,000 |
(1)
|
Includes
shares issuable under the 2007 Lon-Term Incentive Plan (45,000,000), as
described below, and shares issuable under the Company’s employment
agreement with Ramesh Anand
(250,000).
|
12
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Long-Term
Compensation- 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“the Plan”)
The
purpose of the Plan is to further and promote the interests of iTrackr, its
subsidiaries and its stockholders by enabling iTrackr and its subsidiaries to
attract, retain and motivate employees, non-employee directors and consultants
or those who will become employees, non-employee directors or consultants, and
to align the interests of those individuals and iTrackr’s
stockholders.
Notwithstanding
anything elsewhere in the Plan to the contrary, but subject as well to the other
limitations contained in this Section 3 and subject to adjustment as
provided in Section 13 of the Plan:
(i)
|
The
aggregate number of Common Shares actually issued or transferred by the
Company upon the exercise of Nonqualified Stock Options or Incentive Stock
Options (after taking into account forfeitures and cancellations) shall
not exceed Fifteen Million (15,000,000) Common Shares.
|
(ii)
|
The
aggregate number of Common Shares issued as Restricted Stock and
Restricted Stock Units (after taking into account any forfeitures and
cancellations) shall not exceed Fifteen Million (15,000,000) Common
Shares.
|
(iii)
|
The
aggregate number of Common Shares issued as Performance Shares and
Performance Units and other awards under Section 10 of this Plan
(after taking into account any forfeitures and cancellations) shall not
exceed Fifteen Million (15,000,000) Common
Shares.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
|
·
|
On
March 15, 2010, the Company received $50,000 in exchange for the issuance
of 166,666 shares of common stock and the issuance of a one year warrant
for the right to purchase 166,666 shares of the Company’s common stock at
an exercise price of $0.30 per
share.
|
|
·
|
On
February 16, 2010, the Company converted $42,466.48 of shareholder loans
to 119,999 shares of common stock.
|
|
·
|
On
February 5, 2010, the Company sold a warrant to an accredited investor for
$50,000. Under the terms of the warrant, the investor has the right to
purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an
exercise price of $0.40 per share.
|
|
·
|
During
December, 2009, the Company converted $29,944 of shareholder loans to
59,888 shares of common stock.
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, Inflot Holdings Corp. converted $270,000 of
convertible debt principle and interest into 1,386,322 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, Ted Cooper converted $559,302 of convertible debt
principle and interest into 1,118,603 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, Robert Gleckman converted $110,825 of convertible
debt principle and interest into 221,649 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, The Borg Trust converted $55,844 of convertible
debt principle and interest into 111,688 shares of common
stock
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, Robert Klinek & Susan Pack converted
$57,139 of convertible debt principle and interest into 114,277 shares of
common stock.
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, The Winston Family Trust converted $34,631 of
convertible debt principle and interest into 69,261 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, Dominick & Judy Aprile converted $28,879
of convertible debt principle and interest into 57,758 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, Charlie Bonafede converted $5,683 of convertible
debt principle and interest into 11,366 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, Dawn Maywood converted $5,781 of convertible debt
principle and interest into 11,562 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, Sam Maywood converted $5,781 of convertible debt
principle and interest into 11,562 shares of common
stock.
|
13
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, Dr. Michael Gelbar converted $116,666 of
convertible debt principle and interest into 233,332 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, Patricia Scarpella converted $87,510 of convertible
debt principle and interest into 175,019 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, Shirley Harnick converted $58,347 of convertible
debt principle and interest into 116,693 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
October 31, 2009, Michael Nielsen converted $41,083 of convertible
debt principle and interest into 82,165 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
May 5, 2008, Mark MacDougal received 100,000 shares of common stock
as a bonus valued at $50,000.
|
|
·
|
On
May 5, 2008, Justin Van Winkle received 100,000 shares of common
stock as a bonus valued at $50,000.
|
|
·
|
On
February 20, 2008, Steve Danzo earned 14,025 shares of common stock
in exchange for services valued at
$7,013.
|
|
·
|
On
August 21, 2007, Red Rock Strategies Ltd. converted $55,313.70 of
convertible debt principle and interest into 2,765,685 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
August 21, 2007, New Link Ltd. Corp converted $211,403.29 of
convertible debt principle and interest into 3,385,280 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
August 21, 2007, Landmark, Inc. converted $26,069.86 of convertible
debt principle and interest into 104,279 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
August 21, 2007, Beatrice Anne Rizzo converted $98,516.85 of
convertible debt principle and interest into 985,169 shares of common
stock.
|
|
·
|
On
July 1, 2007, Jarem Archer received 750,000 shares of common stock in
lieu of salary valued at $37,500.
|
|
·
|
On
July 1, 2007, John Rizzo received 5,000,000 shares of common stock in
lieu of salary valued at $250,000.
|
|
·
|
On
October 26, 2006, The John Rizzo Family Trust received 250,000 shares
of founder’s common stock at no value; Jarem Archer received 250,000
shares of founder’s common stock at no value; the Christopher Smith Family
Trust received 200,000 shares of founder’s common stock at no value; and
Alejandro Sintas received 100,000 shares of founder’s common stock at no
value.
|
None
of the securities issued in the foregoing transactions were registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), and all were issued pursuant to
an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Act. The
foregoing securities may not be offered or sold in the United States unless
registered under the Act, or pursuant to an exemption from
registration.
Additional
Information
Copies of
our annual reports, quarterly reports, current reports, and any amendments to
those reports, are available free of charge on the internet at www.sec.gov. All
statements made in any of our filings, including all forward-looking statements,
are made as of the date of the document in which the statement is included, and
we do not assume or undertake any obligation to update any of those statements
or documents unless we are required to do so by law.
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
Not
applicable.
ITEM
7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Forward-Looking
Statements
The
following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should
be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes, and
the other financial information included in this prospectus.
14
This
prospectus contains forward-looking statements. The words
“anticipated,” “believe,” “expect, “plan,” “intend,” “seek,” “estimate,”
“project,” “could,” “may,” and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements include, among others,
information regarding future operations, future capital expenditures, and future
net cash flow. Such statements reflect our management’s current views
with respect to future events and financial performance and involve risks and
uncertainties, including, without limitation, general economic and business
conditions, changes in foreign, political, social, and economic conditions,
regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental regulations, the ability
to achieve further market penetration and additional customers, and various
other matters, many of which are beyond our control. Should one or
more of these risks or uncertainties occur, or should underlying assumptions
prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially and adversely from
those anticipated, believed, estimated or otherwise
indicated. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made
in this prospectus are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be
no assurance of the actual results or developments.
MUST
HAVES, INC.
The
following discussion and analysis addresses the major factors that affected our
results of operations and financial condition reflected in our audited financial
statements for the periods ended December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008. This discussion is intended to supplement and highlight information
contained in, and should be read in conjunction with, our financial statements
and related notes and the selected financial data presented elsewhere in this
report. In addition to historical financial information, the following
discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results and timing of selected events
may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements
as a result of many factors, including those discussed under “Risk Factors” in
Part I, Item 1A and elsewhere in this report.
Overview
The
Company is in the business of designing and manufacturing ladies apparel
accessories consisting of beaded and jeweled bra straps that hook or snap into
traditional bras, camisoles and tank tops. We are a development stage company
with nominal revenues, a limited operating history and a reported net loss for
the first time since inception in 2004. Our principal source of revenue comes
from selling our beaded and jeweled bra straps to small boutiques and through
several non-exclusive representatives. The straps are designed, marketed and
sold by our sole officer, director and employee, Stella Gostfrand. Until we hire
additional personnel to help in our marketing efforts and take steps to expand
our markets and distributions channels, we may not be able to effectively market
our products and generate significant revenues to address our auditor’s “going
concern”.
Results
of Operations for the Period ended December 31, 2009 as Compared to the
Period ended December 31, 2008
Revenues
for the period ended December 31, 2009 were $130, a 97% decrease from
$3,757 for the period ended December 31, 2008. We believe the
decrease in sales was the result of the overall state of the economy and market
saturation of lower priced, knock off products by a greater number of online
retailers and websites offering products similar to ours during 2009. As a
result of the decline in sales, our cost of revenue for the period ended
December 31, 2009 was $0, compared to $1,018 for the period
ended December 31, 2008 and our gross profit, likewise, decreased 95% from
$2,739 for the period ended December 31, 2008, to $130 for the period ended
December 31, 2009.
General
and administrative expenses for the period ended December 31, 2009 were
$31,997 or a 38% decrease from $51,765 for the period ended December 31,
2008.
Financial
Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources for the Period Ended
December 31, 2008
Since
inception in 2004, we have funded capital requirements through operations,
proceeds from a private placement in 2007, and loans from our
founder. As of December 31, 2009, we had a cash balance of $95
compared to our cash balance of $272 as of December 31,
2008.
15
Net cash
used by operating activities was $806 for the period ended December 31,
2009 as compared to $34,186 for the period ended December 31,
2008.
Net cash
used in financing activities was $177 for the period ended December 31,
2009 as compared to $8,186 for the year ended December 31,
2008.
Cash
Requirements and Need for Additional Funds
We
believe that approximately $30,000 will be required to cover our operating
expenses for the next 12 months. In addition to covering our operating expenses,
we may require additional cash resources due to changing business conditions or
other future developments, including our proposed expansion or any acquisitions
we may decide to pursue. Our founder has committed to providing additional funds
through loans if funding is not available from any commercial lenders or other
sources; however we cannot give assurance that Mrs. Gostfrand will make
such funds available or that we will enter into any new commitment, or that the
terms of any such commitments will be on terms favorable to us. We may, if
necessary, conduct a private placement or public offering of our stock to raise
capital.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
See “Note
1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Financial Statements for
an explanation of recent accounting pronouncements impacting the
Company.
ITRACKR
SYSTEMS, INC.
The
following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial
condition of the Company on a consolidated basis for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 and should be read in conjunction with iTrackr’s
consolidated financial statements, and the notes to those consolidated financial
statements that are included elsewhere in this Prospectus. Our discussion
includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve
risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations and
intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of
factors, including those set forth under the Risk Factors, Cautionary Notice
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Business sections in this Prospectus.
We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “continuing,”
“ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and
similar expression to identify forward-looking statements.
Recent
Events
On
February 1, 2010, Must Haves, Inc. amended its articles of incorporation with
the State of Florida, changing its name to iTrackr Systems, Inc.
On
December 10, 2009, Must Haves, Inc., iTrackr Acquisition, Inc. (“Merger
Sub”) and iTrackr, Inc., a Florida corporation (“iTrackr”), entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”), which closed January 12, 2010.
On the Closing Date, iTrackr was merged with and into Merger Sub, which is the
surviving corporation and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Registrant.
At the
closing of the Merger, subject to and pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the Agreement, each outstanding share of Purchaser common stock was converted
into one share of common stock of the Registrant. Upon consummation of the
Merger, the shareholders of the Purchaser received an aggregate of 17,875,695
shares of Registrant common stock and thus owned 93.5% of Must Have’s common
stock. Must Haves also assumed 6,555,000 options and warrants of iTrackr, which
are exercisable at prices from $0.01 to $0.40.
In
addition, pursuant to the Plan of Merger Agreement, Stella Gostfrand submitted
her resignation as an officer and director of the Company, and Michael Uhl, Dave
Baesler and John Rizzo were appointed to serve as members of the board of
directors of the Company, all of which will be effective following the
expiration of the ten day period following the mailing of the information
statement required by Rule 14f-1 under the Exchange Act. Upon the
consummation of the Reverse Merger, Ramesh Anand was appointed to serve as Chief
Operating of the Company, and Mr. Rizzo was appointed to serve as Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
16
Overview
iTrackr
Systems, Inc. (“iTrackr”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) was formed in May
2006 to develop, market and commercialize a product and inventory search
application through a social networking site designed to leverage the best of
Internet and Mobile technologies. We have taken the best of several burgeoning
markets, including eCommerce, social networking and mobile content, and
developed what we believe is a powerful platform that drives value to consumers,
retailers and advertising and marketing firms.
iTrackr
Systems intends to introduce and commercialize Internet and Mobile social
merchandizing technology platforms to retailers and consumers. “Social
merchandizing” applies the variety of traditional marketing practices to promote
products and services to a community of individuals via social networking
technologies. iTrackr is similar to MySpace and Facebook; however, our members’
interests are not in diary or event blogging, but in the timely location of
products and services which can be acquired and consumed on a local
level.
iTrackr
Systems’ technology enables consumers to search and track merchandise, letting
the consumer know which retail locations in a local zip code are stocking the
queried merchandise, as well as the comparative prices. In addition, if the item
is not in stock, the consumer can request that iTrackr Systems notify them via
mobile text message or email when the item is delivered to a local retailer and
where that retailer is located.
In 2009,
iTrackr purchased online customers support software technology from Chatstat for
approximately $95,000. iTrackr has subsequently
launched its customer support chat software (“ChatTrackr”) which facilitates
real-time customer support and expert advice, and paid
transactions.
iTrackr
generates revenues primarily through the licensing of its ChatTrackr to two
customers, Respond Q and Saveology. These customers use our application service
provider (“ASP”) system, outsourcing our chat applications for a monthly
fee-per-agent, or license fee and in certain cases, an annual enterprise
fee.
In
addition, we offer customers a hosted ChatTrackr solution, enabling them to
download our software on their website, where agents download a fee-based
desktop application, while we manage the service on our network for an
additional fee. Examples of websites we manage include www.buycomcast.com
and www.buytimewarner.com.
We also bill customers for maintenance and upgrades to our service.
Our plans
for to grow our customer support business is to position ChatTrackr as a sales
tool for online retailers, increasing fees through customer additions, traffic
and through the number of agents using ChatTrackr. We intend to expand our
product search business by offering this service to existing ChatTrackr
customers as a means of driving further traffic to their own websites and
transactional volume. Our target markets include all ecommerce businesses,
financial services, healthcare and automotive.
Our
primary sources of operating funds have been historically through the issuance
of debt and equity. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we raised $333,312 in
debt. To finance our growth strategy, we may continue to actively
pursue additional funds through equity financing, including the sale of
additional shares of common and preferred stock, asset sales, accelerated
payments of maintenance and management fees, debt financing, or a combination
thereof.
At
December 31, 2009, iTrackr Systems had assets of $108,364. For the fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2009 the Company had revenue of $5,826, and net
losses of $192,889. iTrackr has incurred losses since inception and may not be
able to generate sufficient net revenue from its business in the future to
achieve or sustain profitability. At December 31, 2009, the Company had
approximately $3,223of unrestricted cash on hand and assuming there is no change
in sales and expense trends experienced since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009,
the Company believes that its cash on hand is insufficient to continue
operations. The Company currently needs approximately $130,000 to
$160,000 per quarter to maintain and expand our sales and
operations. Thus, the Company will need approximately $520,000 to
$640,000 to continue through December 31, 2010.
17
Impact
of Inflation
General
inflation in the economy has driven the operating expenses of many businesses
higher, and, accordingly we have experienced increased salaries and higher
prices for supplies, goods and services. We continuously seek methods of
reducing costs and streamlining operations while maximizing efficiency through
improved internal operating procedures and controls. While we are subject to
inflation as described above, our management believes that inflation currently
does not have a material effect on our operating results. However, inflation may
become a factor in the future.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to
make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported. Note
A of Notes to Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies
used in the preparation of the financial statements. Certain of these
significant accounting policies are considered to be critical accounting
policies, as defined below.
A
critical accounting policy is defined as one that is both material to the
presentation of our financial statements and requires management to make
difficult, subjective or complex judgments that could have a material effect on
our financial condition and results of operations. Specifically, critical
accounting estimates have the following attributes:
|
·
|
We
are required to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain
at the time of the estimate; and
|
|
·
|
Different
estimates we could reasonably have used, or changes in the estimate that
are reasonably likely to occur, would have a material effect on our
financial condition or results of
operations.
|
Estimates
and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with
certainty. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions believed to be applicable and reasonable under the circumstances.
These estimates may change as new events occur, as additional information is
obtained and as our operating environment changes. These changes have
historically been minor and have been included in the consolidated financial
statements as soon as they became known. Based on a critical assessment of our
accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the
application of those policies, management believes that our financial statements
are fairly stated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States, and present a meaningful presentation of our financial
condition and results of operations.
In
preparing our financial statements to conform to accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, we make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in our financial statements and accompanying notes. These
estimates include useful lives for fixed assets for depreciation calculations
and assumptions for valuing options and warrants. Actual results could differ
from these estimates.
Long-lived
Assets
Long-lived
assets, comprised of equipment, and identifiable intangible assets, are
evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that may cause an
impairment review include significant changes in technology that make current
computer-related assets that we use in our operations obsolete or less useful
and significant changes in the way we use these assets in our operations. When
evaluating long-lived assets for potential impairment, we first compare the
carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated future cash flows
(undiscounted and without interest charges). If the estimated future cash flows
are less than the carrying value of the asset, we calculate an impairment loss.
The impairment loss calculation compares the carrying value of the asset to the
asset’s estimated fair value, which may be based on estimated future cash flows
(discounted and with interest charges). We recognize an impairment loss if the
amount of the asset’s carrying value exceeds the asset’s estimated fair value.
If we recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset
becomes its new cost basis. The new cost basis will be depreciated (amortized)
over the remaining useful life of that asset. Using the impairment evaluation
methodology described herein, there have been no long-lived asset impairment
charges for each of the last two years.
18
Our
impairment loss calculations contain uncertainties because they require
management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future cash
flows and asset fair values, including forecasting useful lives of the assets
and selecting the discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash
flows.
We have
not made any material changes in our impairment loss assessment methodology
during the past two fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable
likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions
we use to calculate long-lived asset impairment losses. However, if actual
results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used in estimating
future cash flows and asset fair values, we may be exposed to losses that could
be material.
Income
Taxes
Provisions
for income taxes are based on taxes payable or refundable for the current period
and deferred taxes on temporary differences between the amount of taxable income
and pretax financial income and between the tax bases of assets and liabilities
and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are included in the financial statements at currently enacted income
tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets and
liabilities are expected to be realized or settled.
When
accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, first, the tax position is evaluated
to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination.
If the tax position is deemed “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained, the tax
position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the
financial statements. The amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the
largest amount that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for
income taxes. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The Company underwent
a change of control for income tax purposes on October 8, 2003 according to
Section 381 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company’s utilization of U.S.
Federal net operating losses will be limited in accordance to Section 381
rules. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. Valuation
allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amount expected to be realized.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth information from our statements of operations for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Years
Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $7,493 representing a 70% increase
from revenues of $4,419 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
increase in revenue is primarily due to the purchase of ChatStat and resulting
sales of live chat software which began in our fourth quarter of
2009.
Total
operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $610,973 or 52%
lower compared to $1,274,718 for the year ended December 31,
2008. The $663,745 decrease in operating expenses is the result of
cost cutting measures and was primarily due to a $483,523 decrease in personnel
and professional fees and a $175,267 decrease in stock compensation
expense.
Total
other income and expense was expense of $253,462 for the year ended December 31,
2009 compared to $58,574 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
$194,888, increase was due to an increase of $31,888 in interest expense as our
debt balance in 2009 increased compared to 2008, $25,000 accrued for the
settlement of a legal claim by a former consultant and $138,000 write-off of a
worthless investment.
19
Our net
loss was $856,942 for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to a loss of
$1,328,873 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The 471,931 or 36%
improvement in 2009 compared to 2008 was primarily due to our cost cutting
measures which reduced operating expenses $663,745 offset by increases in other
expenses of $194,888.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
From
inception to December 31, 2009, we have incurred an accumulated deficit of
$3,024,954. This loss has been incurred through a combination of
professional fees and expenses supporting our plans to develop our website and
brand our services as well as continued operating losses. Since
inception, we have financed our operations primarily through debt and equity
financing. During the year ended December 31, 2009 we had a net
decrease in cash of $179,921. Total cash resources as of December 31,
2009 was $3,223 compared with $183,144 at December 31, 2008.
Our
available working capital and capital requirements will depend upon numerous
factors, including the sale of live chat services, the timing and cost of
expanding into new markets, the cost of developing competitive technologies, the
resources that we devote to developing new products and commercializing
capabilities, the status of our competitors, our ability to establish
collaborative arrangements with other organizations, and our ability to attract
and retain key employees.
Net cash
used by operating activities was $414,379 for the period ended December 31,
2009 as compared to $794,550 for the period ended December 31,
2008.
Net cash
used by investing activities was $98,854 for the period ended December 31,
2009 as compared to $5,485 for the period ended December 31,
2008.
Net cash
provided by financing activities was $333,312 for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as compared to $883,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Cash
Requirements and Need for Additional Funds
We
believe that approximately $ will be required to cover our operating expenses
for the next 12 months. In addition to covering our operating expenses, we may
require additional cash resources due to changing business conditions or other
future developments, including any acquisitions we may decide to
pursue. We may, if necessary, conduct a private placement or public
offering of our stock to raise capital.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have
no material off-balance sheet transactions.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK.
Not
applicable.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The
information required by this Item 8 is included at the end of this Report
beginning at page F-1.
ITEM
9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM
9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
MUST
HAVES, INC.
20
Conclusion
Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
carried out an evaluation as required by Rule 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the
Exchange Act, under the supervision and with the participation of our sole
officer, Stella Gostfrand, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2009. Based upon that
evaluation, our sole officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our sole officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure
controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance
of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and
sole officer necessarily was required to apply her judgment in evaluating the
cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
We are
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act
as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our sole officer, and
effected by our sole officer and sole director, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that:
|
•
|
Pertain to the maintenance of
records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of our
assets;
|
|
•
|
Provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of our sole officer and
director; and
|
|
•
|
Provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use
or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
|
Our
internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our
management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair
presentation of published financial statements. Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Our sole
officer assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment,
management used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control — Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Based on management’s assessment, we believe that, as of
December 31, 2009, our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009, was effective.
Changes
in Internal Controls
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2009, there were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
21
Report
of the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
This
annual report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal
control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to
attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that
permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual
report.
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
As
reported and filed on Form 14C with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 5, 2009, Must Haves’ Board of Directors approved and recommended,
pursuant to a written consent dated September 18, 2009, that the following
Proposals be accepted:
|
•
|
to amend our Articles of
Incorporation to effectuate a 1-for-4 reverse split of our outstanding
common stock; and
|
|
•
|
to increase our authorized common
stock from 10,000,000 shares to 100,000,000 shares and our preferred stock
from 1,000,000 to 10,000,000
shares.
|
Must
Haves, Inc.’s stockholders holding a majority of the voting power approved the
Proposals, pursuant to a written consent dated September 18,
2009.
PART III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE.
MUST
HAVES, INC.
The
following table sets forth the names, positions with Must Haves and ages of the
executive officers and directors of Must Haves. Directors are elected at Must
Haves’ annual meeting of shareholders and serve for one year or until their
successors are elected and qualify. Officers are elected by the Board of
Directors and their terms of office are, except to the extent governed by
employment contract, at the discretion of the Board of Directors of
Directors.
Name
|
Age
|
Position Held
|
||
Stella
Gostfrand
|
38
|
President, Director
|
Stella Gostfrand serves as
President of the Company and is the sole director and officer of the Company.
Prior to founding Must Haves, Mrs. Gostfrand was a licensed real estate
agent from 1994 to 2002. She attended Auburn University and currently chairs the
volunteer program at The Kesher School for children with learning
differences.
Board
of Directors of Directors
Our Board
of Directors of Directors currently consists of one member. Our Bylaws provide
that our board shall consist of not less than one individual and not more than
seven individuals. The terms of directors expire at the next annual
shareholders’ meeting. Each shareholder is entitled to vote the number of shares
owned by him for as many persons as there are directors to be elected.
Shareholders do not have a right to cumulate their votes for directors. There
are no agreements to compensate any director for their services.
Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 16(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company’s directors and
executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of the Company’s
outstanding Common Stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common
Stock. Such persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with
copies of all such reports they file. To the Company’s knowledge, all
Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its sole officer, director
and beneficial owners holding greater than ten percent of the Company’s Common
Stock have been complied with during the period ended December 31,
2009.
22
Committees
We have
not established any committees. Our President, Stella Gostfrand, reviews the
professional services provided by our independent auditors, the independence of
our auditors from our management, our annual financial statements and our system
of internal accounting controls. Mrs. Gostfrand is not considered a
“financial expert.” We have no qualified financial experts at this time because
we have inadequate financial resources at this time to hire such an
expert.
Code
of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of
Ethics that applies to the Company’s executive and financial officers, or
persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics is attached to this
Report as an exhibit. We will disclose any amendments or waivers to
our Code of Ethics on our website at www.itrackr.com.
ITRACKR
SYSTEMS, INC.
Upon the
closing of the merger, the following individuals were named to our board of
directors and executive management:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Term
|
|||
John
Rizzo
|
48
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
January
12, 2010 thru Present
|
|||
Ramesh
Anand
|
46
|
Chief
Operating Officer
|
January
12, 2009 thru Present
|
|||
Dave
Baesler
|
63
|
Director
|
January
12, 2009 thru Present
|
|||
Michael
Uhl
|
47
|
Director
|
January
12, 2009 thru Present
|
Ramesh Anand has served as
iTrackr’s interim CEO since January, 2010. Mr. Anand currently also serves
as VP of Global Sales and Marketing for Advanced Contact Solutions, since April,
2009. Prior to that, Mr. Anand served as Head of Sales, North America for
HTMT Global Solutions, Ltd for the period of 2006 through 2008, and as Head of
Sales of Hero ITES from 2005 through 2006. He has also served as VP Sales and
Business Development at IBM Daksh Business Process Services, Director of Global
Outsourcing of Ocwen Financial Corporation, and Founded Global E-Connect.
Mr. Anand has a Master of Management Studies from Birla Institute of
Technology and Science.
Michael Uhl was first elected
to the Board of Directors in March, 2007. Mr. Uhl is regional VP of
HelmsBriscoe. He previously served as Executive VP of Sales and Marketing at
Caesar’s Entertainment, wherein he directed convention and travel industry sales
for Bally’s Paris, Flamingo, Caesar’s Palace and the Las Vegas Hilton.
Mr. Uhl has also held Director of Sales positions with Walt Disney World
Swan & Dolphin and New York Hilton & Towers. Mr. Uhl
holds a BBA from Hofstra University.
David Baesler was first
elected to the Board of Directors in November, 2007. Mr. Baesler is VP of
Sales for the Wireless Division of Kyocera Sanyo. In addition to Kyocera Sanyo,
Mr. Baesler has held executive positions at several leading consumer
electronics companies, including Executive VP of Brother International; Group VP
of Toshiba North America’s Consumer Products Division; Senior VP of Pioneer
Corporation’s Video Division; and VP of Sales for Pioneer Electronics.
Mr. Baesler served as an officer in the US Army and holds a degree in
mathematics and economics from North Dakota State University.
John Rizzo is the founder of
iTrackr. Mr. Rizzo has more than a decade experience in the capital markets
as well as maintaining key roles with start-up and early stage businesses. He
has been integral in the completion of several successful transactions,
including sale of a business to MasterCard and in Siebel Systems’ 1996 Initial
Public Offering.
23
Except as
noted above, the above persons do not hold any other directorships in any
company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the
Exchange Act or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange
Act.
The
Board of Directors and Committees
Board
Composition
iTrackr
did not pay any director compensation during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009. The Company may begin to compensate its directors at
some time in the future.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a)
of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and officers, and persons
who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity
securities, to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial
ownership of the Company’s securities with the SEC on Forms 3, 4 and 5.
Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC
regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms
they file. To the Company’s knowledge, all Section 16(a) filing
requirements applicable to its officers, directors and beneficial owners holding
greater than ten percent of the Company’s Common Stock have been complied with
during the period ended December 31, 2009.
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our board
of directors has adopted a code of ethics, which applies to all our directors,
officers and employees. Our code of ethics is intended to comply with the
requirements of Item 406 of Regulation S-K. A copy of our code of
ethics will be posted on our corporate website at
www.shenyangkeji.com. We will provide our code of ethics in print
without charge to any stockholder who makes a written request
to: Secretary, iTrackr Systems, Inc., 475 Plaza Real, Suite 275, Boca
Raton, FL 33432. Any waivers of the application and any amendments to our code
of ethics must be made by our board of directors. Any waivers of, and any
amendments to, our code of ethics will be disclosed promptly on our corporate
website.
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
MUST
HAVES, INC.
The
following table sets forth certain summary information concerning the
compensation paid or accrued for each fiscal year since inception to the
Company’s executive officers during such period (as determined at
December 31, 2009, the end of the Registrant’s last completed fiscal
year).
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Award(s)
(#)
|
Non Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
|
Non Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stella
Gostfrand,
|
2009
|
$ | -0- | $ | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | |||||||||||||||||||||
President
|
2008
|
$ | -0- | $ | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | $ | -0- | $ | -0- | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
$ | -0- | $ | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | -0- | $ | -0- | $ | -0- |
Since
inception, our founder and sole officer and director has received no salary for
her services, has not received such compensation in the past, and is not
accruing any compensation pursuant to any employment agreement with the
Company.
24
There are
no compensatory plans or arrangements, including payments to be received from
the Company, with respect to any person named in Cash Compensation set out above
which would in any way result in payments to any such person’s termination of
employment with the Company or any change in control of the Company, or a change
in the person’s responsibilities following a change in control of the
Company
ITRACKR
SYSTEMS, INC.
Summary
Compensation Tables
The
following table provides certain information for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 concerning compensation earned for services
rendered in all capacities by our named executive officers during the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Name and Principal
Position (a)
|
Year
(b)
|
Salary
($) (c)
|
Bonus
($) (d)
|
Stock Awards
($) (e)
|
Option Awards
($) (f)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (g)
|
Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($) (h)
|
All Other
Compensation
($) (i)
|
Total
($) (j)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
John
Rizzo,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chairman
and
|
2009
|
250,000 | (2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36,000 | (3) | 286,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
CEO
|
2008
|
0 | 0 | 250,000 | 61,200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 311,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stella
Gostfrand,
Former
Sole
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Officer
and
|
2009
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Director
(1)
|
2008
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(1)
|
Stella Gostfrand submitted her
resignation as an officer and director, effective following the expiration
of the ten day period following the mailing of the information statement
required by Rule 14f-1 under the Exchange
Act.
|
(2)
|
Salary was accrued in 2008 and
2009.
|
(3)
|
Accrued reimbursement of unpaid
health insurance and rent.
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2009 Fiscal Year End
I am not
aware of any o/s equity awards.
Employment
Agreements
The
information provided below, including the share numbers and dollar amounts, is
after giving effect to the Reverse Merger and the change in control which will
become effective following the expiration of the ten day period following the
mailing of the information statement required by Rule 14f-1 under the
Exchange Act.
Ramesh
Anand
Under the
terms of Mr. Anand’s contract, entered into in January, 2010, in lieu of
cash payment for compensation, he received an option to purchase Two Hundred and
Fifty Thousand (250,000) fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock
at an exercise price of $0.25 and a life of five years. Mr. Anand is
entitled to four (4) weeks of paid vacation in each twelve (12) month
period during Executive’s employment hereunder which shall accrue on a monthly
basis during Executives employment hereunder. At the discretion of the Board and
in accordance with Company policy, Mr. Anand is eligible to participate in
benefits under any employee benefit plan or arrangement made available by the
Company now or in the future to its executives and its employees. As Chief
Operating Officer, Mr. Anand’s performance shall be reviewed by the Board
on a periodic basis (not less than once each fiscal year) and the Board may, in
its sole discretion, award such bonuses to Mr. Anand as shall be
appropriate or desirable based on Mr. Anand’s performance.
25
John
Rizzo
Under the
terms of Mr. Rizzo’s contract, entered into in January, 2007, which held an
initial term of 3 years, and has been extended by the Company’s board of
Directors for an additional year, Mr. Rizzo is to be paid a base annual
salary at the rate of $250,000.00 dollars per year. Mr. Rizzo is entitled
to Twelve (12) weeks vacation during each year of employment. And his
family shall be eligible to participate in the Company’s paid health plan.
However, if Mr. Rizzo so chooses, he can maintain his own family health
plan and the Company will subsidize that plan in the amount of Net $1,000.00 per
month.
Director
Compensation
The
Company did not and does not currently have an established policy to provide
compensation to members of its board of directors for their services in that
capacity. The Company intends to develop such a policy in the near
future.
ITEM
12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
MUST
HAVES, INC.
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. In computing
the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage of
ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options and warrants
held by that person that are currently exercisable or become exercisable within
60 days of the date of this report are deemed outstanding even if they have not
actually been exercised. Those shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for
the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other
person.
As of
December 31, 2009, we have authorized 100,000,000 shares of common stock,
no par value, of which 1,243,750 shares were
issued and outstanding and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value,
of which no shares are issued and outstanding. The following table sets forth
certain information regarding beneficial ownership of the our common stock as of
December 31, 2009, held by any person known to the Company to be the
beneficial owner of 5% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock, by
each executive officer and director, and by all directors and executive officers
as a group. Each person or entity named in the table has sole voting power and
investment power with respect to all shares of capital stock listed as owned by
that person or entity.
Title of Class
|
Name and Address of Beneficial
Owner
|
Number of Shares
Beneficially
Owned
|
Percentage of
Outstanding Shares
Beneficially Owned
|
|||||||
Common
|
Stella
Gostfrand (1)
1507
Presidential Way
North
Miami Beach, FL 33179
|
1,022,388 | 82.2 | % | ||||||
Common
|
Robert
Stein
5150
Genesta Avenue
Encino,
CA 91316
|
125,000 | 10 | % | ||||||
Officers
and Directors as a Group (one person)
|
1,147,388 | 92.2 | % |
(1)
|
Mrs. Gostfrand
is the sole officer and director of Must Haves. Her 1,022,388 shares are
held in her name individually.
|
The
Company has not adopted any retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or
insurance programs or other similar programs for the benefit of employees,
officers or directors. There are no contracts or other arrangements that could
result in a change of control of the Company.
26
ITRACKR
SYSTEMS, INC.
The
following table sets forth certain information, as of February 15, 2010, with
respect to the beneficial ownership of the outstanding common stock by
(i) any holder of more than five percent, (ii) each of the Company’s
executive officers and directors, and (iii) the Company’s directors and
executive officers as a group.
Name
and address of the beneficial owner(1)
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(2)
|
Percent of
common stock
|
||||||
Ramesh
Anand (3)
16301
Via Venetia East
Delray
Beach, FL 33484
|
250,000 | 1.34 | % | |||||
Red
Rock Strategies, Ltd.
No.
6, Floor 3
Quomar
Trading Building
Road
Town, BVI
|
2,765,685 | 15.07 | % | |||||
New
Link Ltd Corp.
810
NW 127th
Ave
Coral
Springs FL 33071
|
3,185,280 | 17.35 | % | |||||
John
Rizzo (4)
17597
Circle Pond Ct.
Boca
Raton FL 33496
|
7,250,000 | 39.50 | % | |||||
Michael
Uhl (5)
301
Great Gable Drive
Las
Vegas, NV 89123
|
375,000 | 2.00 | % | |||||
David
Baesler (6)
500
Morris Avenue Suite 301
Springfield,
NJ 07081
|
450,000 | 2.39 | % | |||||
Directors
and officers as a group
|
8,325,000 | 43.40 | % |
1)
|
Beneficial Ownership is
determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect
to securities. Each of the beneficial owners listed above has direct
ownership of and sole voting power and investment power with respect to
the shares of Company common stock and except as indicated the address of
each beneficial owner is 433 Plaza Real, Suite 275, Boca Raton FL
33432.
|
(2)
|
Shares of common stock
beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership
of common stock assumes the exercise of all options, warrants and other
securities convertible into common stock beneficially owned by such person
or entity currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February
15, 2010. Shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and
warrants exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding and held by the
holder of such options or warrants for computing the percentage of
outstanding common stock beneficially owned by such person, but are not
deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of outstanding common
stock beneficially owned by any other
person.
|
(3)
|
Including 250,000 shares of
common stock underlying the
Warrants.
|
(4)
|
Including 2,000,000 shares of
common stock underlying the
Warrants.
|
(5)
|
Including 375,000 shares of
common stock underlying the
Warrants.
|
(6)
|
Including 450,000 shares of
common stock underlying the
Warrants.
|
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE.
MUST
HAVES, INC.
27
Stella
Gostfrand has loaned funds to the Company to be used as working capital. The
loans have no stated interest and are due upon demand. The balance due as of
December 31, 2009 was $29,185.
We use
office space at the residence of Mrs. Gostfrand to conduct our activities
at no charge.
ITRACKR
SYSTEMS, INC.
Merger
On
January 12, 2010, we completed a merger with a subsidiary of Must
Haves. On the Closing Date, iTrackr was merged with and into iTrackr
Acquisition, Inc., which is the surviving corporation and became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Must Haves.
At the
closing of the Merger, subject to and pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the Agreement, each outstanding share of iTrackr common stock was converted into
one share of common stock of the Must Haves. Upon consummation of the Merger,
the shareholders of the iTrackr received an aggregate of 17,875,695 shares of
Must Haves common stock and thus owned 93.5% of the Must Have’s common stock.
Must Haves also assumed 6,555,000 options and warrants of iTrackr, which are
exercisable at prices from $0.01 to $0.40.
In
addition, pursuant to the Plan of Merger Agreement, Stella Gostfrand submitted
her resignation as an officer and director of the Company, and Michael Uhl, Dave
Baesler and John Rizzo were appointed to serve as members of the board of
directors of the Company. Upon the consummation of the Reverse Merger, Ramesh
Anand was appointed to serve as Chief Operating Officer.
Other
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company received $150,750 from
Bluewater Advisors, a company owned by John Rizzo, CEO, in exchange for
convertible promissory notes. During 2008, the Company repaid $40,750 of these
notes. During 2008 the Company made no salary payments to Mr. Rizzo
pursuant to his employment contract, therefore the Company accrued $250,000.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company paid
Mr. Rizzo $90,000 of salary and accrued $160,000.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
Jewett,
Schwartz, Wolfe & Associates (“Jewett Schwartz”) served as the
Company’s independent auditor for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008. The following is a summary of the fees billed to the Company by Jewett
Schwartz for professional services rendered during the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:
December 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Audit
fees
|
$ | 15,000 | $ | 12,000 | ||||
Audit
related fees
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||
Tax
fees
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||
All
other fees
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||
Total
|
$ | 15,000 | $ | 12,000 |
28
Audit
fees include fees for the audit and quarterly reviews of the consolidated
financial statements, assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC
and accounting and financial reporting consultations and research work necessary
to comply with generally accepted auditing standards. We do not have an audit
committee currently serving and as a result our sole director performs the
duties of an audit committee. Our sole director will evaluate and approve in
advance, the scope and cost of the engagement of an auditor before the auditor
renders audit and non-audit services.
Pre-Approval
Policy
MUST
HAVES, INC.
The board
of directors acts as the audit committee of the Company, and accordingly, all
services are approved by all the members of the board of directors.
ITRACKR
SYSTEMS, INC.
The Board
of Directors pre-approves all auditing services and permitted non-audit
services, if any, including tax services, to be performed for us by our
independent auditor, subject to the de minimis exceptions for
non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act which
are approved by the Audit Committee prior to the completion of the audit. The
scope of the pre-approval shall include pre-approval of all fees and terms of
engagement. The Board of Directors may form and delegate authority to
subcommittees consisting of one or more members when appropriate, including the
authority to grant pre-approvals of audit and permitted non-audit services,
provided that decisions of such subcommittee to grant pre-approvals shall be
presented to the Board of Directors at its next scheduled meeting.
PART IV
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a) Financial
Statements.
Page
|
||
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accountant
|
F-1
|
|
Balance
Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
F-2
|
|
Statements
of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and
2008
|
F-3
|
|
Statements
of Stockholders Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and
2008
|
F-4
|
|
Statements
of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and
2008
|
F-5
|
|
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
F-6-F-11
|
(b) Exhibits.
Exhibit No.
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Must Haves, Inc. Previously
filed as Exhibit Number 3.2 with Form 10-SB12G Registration Statement,
September 14, 2007, Commission File No. 000-52810; incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
3.2
|
Amendments
to Articles of Incorporation filed with Form 10-Q on November 24, 2009,
incorporated herein by
reference.
|
29
3.3
|
Bylaws
of Must Haves, Inc. Previously filed as Exhibit Number 3.3 with Form
10-SB12G Registration Statement on September 14, 2007, Commission File
No. 000-52810; incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
10.1
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger. Previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 with Form 8-K on
December 16, 2009, Commission File No. 000-21810; incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
10.2
|
Form
of 2010 Employment Agreement entered into with John Rizzo (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19,
2010).
|
|
10.3
|
Form
of 2010 Employment Agreement entered into with Ramesh Anand (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19,
2010).
|
|
10.4
|
Form
of Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the
current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 19, 2010).
|
|
14
|
Code
of Ethics. Previously filed as Exhibit 14.1 with Form 10-K, on March 31,
2008, incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
31
|
Certification
of Principle Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ITRACKR
SYSTEMS, INC.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
April
12, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ John Rizzo
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|
||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE
|
TITLE
|
DATE
|
||
/s/ John Rizzo
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the
|
April
12, 2010
|
||
John
Rizzo
|
Board
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal
|
|||
Financial
Officer)
|
||||
/s/ Stella Gostfrand
|
Former
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|
April
12, 2010
|
||
Stella
Gostfrand
|
of
the Board (Must Haves, Inc. Principal
|
|||
Executive
Officer)
|
||||
/s/ David Baesler
|
Director
|
April
12, 2010
|
||
David
Baesler
|
||||
/s/ Michael Uhl
|
Director
|
April
12,
2010
|
31
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
board of directors and stockholders of
Must
Haves, Inc.
We have
audited the accompanying balance sheets of Must Haves, Inc. as of December 31,
2009 and 2008 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders'
deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Must Haves, Inc. for December 31,
2009 and 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years
then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that Must Haves,
Inc. will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the
financial statements, Must Haves, Inc. has suffered losses from operations,
which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/
Jewett, Schwartz, Wolfe & Associates
March 18,
2010
Jewett,
Schwartz, Wolfe & Associates
Hollywood,
Florida
F-1
MUST
HAVES, INC.
BALANCE
SHEETS
December 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 95 | $ | 272 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
1,562 | 2,000 | ||||||
Inventory,
net
|
- | 6,942 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
- | 500 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
1,657 | 9,714 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 1,657 | $ | 9,714 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 28,923 | $ | 14,581 | ||||
Other
payables
|
249 | - | ||||||
Stockholders'
loan
|
- | 29,185 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
29,172 | 43,766 | ||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, no par value, 10,000,000 authorized shares No shares issued and
outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, no par value, 100,000,000 authorized shares 1,303,638 shares issued
and outstanding and
|
||||||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
189,416 | 148,700 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(216,931 | ) | (182,752 | ) | ||||
Total
Stockholders' Deficit
|
(27,515 | ) | (34,052 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
LIABILITES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
$ | 1,657 | $ | 9,714 |
F-2
MUST
HAVES, INC.
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
REVENUE
|
$ | 130 | $ | 3,757 | ||||
COST
OF REVENUE
|
- | 1,018 | ||||||
GROSS
PROFIT
|
130 | 2,739 | ||||||
General
and administrative expense
|
31,997 | 51,765 | ||||||
Loss
from operations before interest expense
|
(31,867 | ) | (49,026 | ) | ||||
Interest
expense
|
2,312 | 2,335 | ||||||
Loss
before taxes
|
(34,179 | ) | (51,361 | ) | ||||
Provision
(benefit) from income taxes
|
- | - | ||||||
Net
Loss
|
$ | (34,179 | ) | $ | (51,361 | ) | ||
Weighted
average shares outstanding - basic and diluted
|
1,246,211 | 4,975,000 | ||||||
Earnings
per share - basic and diluted
|
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) |
F-3
MUST
HAVES, INC.
STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 and 2008
Shares
|
Additional
|
|||||||||||||||
Issued and
|
Paid in
|
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||
Outstanding
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Total Equity
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
1,243,750 | $ | 142,700 | $ | (131,391 | ) | $ | 11,309 | ||||||||
Capital
contribution from stockholder
|
6,000 | 6,000 | ||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | (51,361 | ) | (51,361 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
1,243,750 | $ | 148,700 | $ | (182,752 | ) | $ | (34,052 | ) | |||||||
Capital
contribution from stockholder
|
6,000 | 6,000 | ||||||||||||||
Shares
issued in connection with conversion of stockholder loan and accrued
interest
|
59,888 | 34,716 | 34,716 | |||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | (34,179 | ) | (34,179 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2009
|
1,303,638 | 189,416 | (216,931 | ) | (27,515 | ) |
F-4
MUST
HAVES, INC.
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (34,179 | ) | $ | (51,361 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Common
stock issued for services
|
- | - | ||||||
Capital
contribution from stockholder
|
6,000 | 6,000 | ||||||
Conversion
of accrued interest to common stock
|
4,902 | - | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
438 | 432 | ||||||
Inventory
|
6,942 | 886 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
14,591 | 10,357 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
500 | (500 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(806 | ) | (34,186 | ) | ||||
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from stockholder loan
|
629 | 26,000 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of stock
|
- | - | ||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
629 | 26,000 | ||||||
Net
decrease in cash
|
(177 | ) | (8,186 | ) | ||||
Cash
- beginning of year
|
272 | 8,458 | ||||||
Cash
- end of the period
|
$ | 95 | $ | 272 | ||||
Supplemental
Disclosures:
|
||||||||
Conversion
of stockholder loan to common stock
|
$ | 29,814 | $ | - | ||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Cash
paid for taxes
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Common
stock issued for services
|
$ | - | $ | - |
F-5
NOTE 1. SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Company
Background
Must
Haves, Inc. (the Company) is a Florida corporation that was established during
2004. The Company designs and sells ladies clothing accessories from
its location in North Miami.
Going
Concern
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which
contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has
incurred a net loss of $34,179 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and has not
developed a substantial source of revenue. The Company has computed a merger
with iTrackr, Inc. on January 10, 2010 as more fully described in Note 5. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure at the date of the financial statements and during
the reporting period. Accordingly, actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company presents revenue in accordance with the provision of ASC 605 “Revenue
Recognition in Financial Statements”, which states that revenue is realized or
realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: Persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been
rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and
collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized upon delivery and
acceptance of goods. Since the Company’s primary customers are direct suppliers
and goods must be accepted at delivery, sales returns are minimal. Should such a
situation arise, the Company’s policy is to exchange the product.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2009, cash and cash
equivalents include cash on hand and cash in the bank.
Accounts
Receivable
Substantially
all of the Company’s accounts receivable is due from customers located within
the United States. Judgments are made with respect to the collectibility of
account receivable based on historical experience and current economic trends.
The Company considers all accounts receivable fully collectible; therefore no
allowance for doubtful accounts has been made as December 31, 2009.
Inventory
Inventory
consists of ladies accessories and related supplies. It is stated at
the lower of cost or market; determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO)
cost method. Due to the nature of the inventory, the Company has not made an
allowance for obsolete inventory at December 31, 2009, as all pieces are
expected to be sold or can be interchanged with other styles.
The
Company writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable
inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the
estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market
conditions. The Company writes down inventory during the period in which such
products are considered no longer effective. During 2009, the Company has
written down $ 6,942 for inventory.
F-6
MUST
HAVES, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2009
Cost
of revenue
Cost of
revenue consists of materials, supplies, contract labor, shipping and delivery
costs. The fair value of contributed facilities by the Company’s sole employee
are also included as a cost of revenue.
General
and administrative expense
General
and administrative expense includes professional fees, bank and credit card
service charges, travel, telephone and office expense. The fair value of
contributed services by the Company’s sole employee are also recorded as general
and administrative expense.
Income
Taxes
The
Company uses the liability method for income taxes as required by ASC 740
"Accounting for Income Taxes." Under this method, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and
tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the
differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established when
it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The Company has established a 100% valuation and, therefore, no provision or
benefit from taxes has been recorded in the Statement of
Operations.
The
Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48,
"Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of ASC 740,"
effective January 1, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and a
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Benefits from tax
positions should be recognized in the financial statements only when it is more
likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the
appropriate taxing authority that would have full knowledge of all relevant
information. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition
threshold is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than
fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Tax positions
that previously failed to meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold
should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which
that threshold is met. Previously recognized tax positions that no longer meet
the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be derecognized in the
first subsequent financial reporting period in which that threshold is no longer
met. FIN 48 also provides guidance on the accounting for and disclosure of
unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties. Adoption of FIN 48 did not
have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivable.
Impairment
of Long-lived Assets
The
Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever circumstances and
situations change such that there is an indication that the carrying amounts may
not be recovered. At December 31, 2009 the Company believes that there has been
no impairment of its long-lived assets.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company’s financial instruments include cash and accounts receivable. The
carrying amount of these financial instruments has been estimated by management
to approximate fair value.
“Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” requires disclosures of information
regarding the fair value of certain financial instruments for which it is
practicable to estimate the value. For purpose of this disclosure, the fair
value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a
forced sale of liquidation.
F-7
MUST
HAVES, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2009
The
company accounts for certain assets and liabilities at fair value. The hierarchy
below lists three levels of fair value based on the extent to which inputs used
in measuring fair value are observable in the market. We categorize each of
our fair value measurements in one of these three levels based on the lowest
level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
These levels are:
Level
1—inputs are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments
traded in active markets. We have no Level 1 instruments as of December 31,
2009.
Level
2—inputs are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets,
quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not
active, and model-based valuation techniques (e.g. the Black-Scholes model) for
which all significant inputs are observable in the market or can be corroborated
by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and
discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based observable
inputs including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and forward and
spot prices for currencies and commodities. We have no Level 2 instruments as of
December 31, 2009.
Level
3—inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimates
of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based
techniques, including option pricing models and discounted cash flow models. We
have no Level 3 instruments as of December 31, 2009.
Earnings
Per Share
Basic
earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to
common shareholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the
potential dilution that could occur if stock options and other commitments to
issue common stock were exercised or equity awards vest resulting in the
issuance of common stock that could share in the earnings of the
Company.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Recent
accounting pronouncements that the Company has adopted or will be required to
adopt in the future are summarized below.
In May
2009, the FASB issued ASC 855, Subsequent Events, which
provides guidance on events that occur after the balance sheet date but prior to
the issuance of the financial statements. ASC 855 distinguishes events requiring
recognition in the financial statements and those that may require disclosure in
the financial statements. Furthermore, ASC 855 requires disclosure of the date
through which subsequent events were evaluated. These requirements are effective
for interim and annual periods after June 15, 2009. We adopted these
requirements for the year ended December 31, 2009, and have evaluated subsequent
events through March 17, 2010.
In August
2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-05 which includes amendments to Subtopic 820-10,
“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures—Overall”. The update provides
clarification that in circumstances, in which a quoted price in an active market
for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to
measure fair value using one or more of the techniques provided for in this
update. The amendments in this ASU clarify that a reporting entity is not
required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to
the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability and
also clarifies that both a quoted price in an active market for the
identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the
identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no
adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value
measurements. The guidance provided in this ASU is effective for the first
reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after issuance. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial position and results of operations.
F-8
MUST
HAVES, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2009
In
September 2009, the FASB has published ASU No. 2009-12, “Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net
Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)”. This ASU amends Subtopic 820-10,
“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall”, to permit a reporting
entity to measure the fair value of certain investments on the basis of the net
asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent). This ASU also
requires new disclosures, by major category of investments including the
attributes of investments within the scope of this amendment to the
Codification. The guidance in this Update is effective for interim and annual
periods ending after December 15, 2009. Early application is permitted. The
adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s financial
position and results of operations.
NOTE 2. LOAN
FROM RELATED PARTY
The
Company has borrowed funds from its president to be used as working capital. The
loans have no stated interest and are due upon demand. The average balance of
the loan as of December 16, 2009 was $29,814. In lieu of a stated interest rate,
the Company imputes interest at 8% based on the average loan balance. As a
result, the Company has recorded interest expense of $2,312 for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
In
December 2009, the Company converted $29,814 of stockholder loans and $4,902 of
accrued interest in to 59,888 shares of common stock.
NOTE
3. STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
On
October 26, 2009, Must Haves, Inc. simultaneously completed a 4-1 reverse
split of common stock and amended its articles of incorporation to
authorize the issuance of 110,000,000 shares of stock consisting of 100,000,000
shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The board of
directors has the authority to issue additional shares of common stock up to the
authorized capital stated in the articles of incorporation. The board of
directors may choose to issue some or all of such shares to provide additional
financing in the future. The issuance of any such shares may result in a
reduction of the book value or market price of the outstanding shares of our
common stock. It will also cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and
voting power of all other stockholders.
NOTE 4. EARNINGS
PER SHARE
Basic
earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common
shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that
could occur if stock options and other commitments to issue common stock were
exercised or equity awards vest resulting in the issuance of common stock or
conversion of notes into shares of the Company’s common stock that could
increase the number of shares outstanding and lower the earnings per share of
the Company’s common stock. This calculation is not done for periods in a loss
position as this would be antidilutive. As of December 31, 2009,
there were no stock options or stock awards that would have been included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share that could potentially dilute basic
earnings per share in the future. The information related to basic
and diluted earnings per share is as follows:
For the Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Numerator:
|
||||||||
Continuing
operations:
|
||||||||
Income
from continuing operations
|
$ | (34,179 | ) | $ | (51,361 | ) | ||
Effect
of dilutive convertible debt
|
— | — | ||||||
Total
|
$ | (34,179 | ) | $ | (51,361 | ) | ||
Net
loss
|
$ | (34,179 | ) | $ | (51,361 | ) | ||
Denominator:
|
||||||||
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding – basic and diluted
|
1,246,211 | 4,975,000 |
F-9
MUST
HAVES, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2009
NOTE 5.
INCOME TAXES
At
December 31, 2009 we had deferred tax assets principally arising from the net
operating loss carry forwards for income tax purposes multiplied by an
approximate expected rate of 40.5%. As management of the Company cannot
determine that it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefit of
the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset
has be established at December 31, 2009.
The
significant components of the deferred tax asset at December 31, 2009 and
2008 were as follows:
December 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Current
Deferred benefit:
|
$ | 13,843 | $ | 20,801 | ||||
13,843 | 20,801 | |||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(13,843 | ) | (20,801 | ) | ||||
(Benefit)
provision for income taxes, net
|
$ | - | $ | - |
The
difference between income tax expense computed by applying the federal statutory
corporate tax rate and actual income tax expense is as follows:
December 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Combined
statutory income tax rate
|
40.5 | % | 40.5 | % | ||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(40.5 | )% | 40.5 | % | ||||
Effective
tax rate
|
- | - |
Deferred
income taxes result from temporary differences in the recognition of income and
expenses for the financial reporting purposes and for tax purposes. The
effects of temporary differences that gave rise to deferred tax assets are as
follows:
December 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
operating loss carry-forward
|
87,857 | 74,015 | ||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(87,857 | ) | (74,015 | ) | ||||
Deferred income tax
asset
|
$ | - | $ | - |
The
Company has made a 100% valuation allowance of the deferred income tax asset at
December 31, 2009, as it is not expected that the deferred tax assets will be
realized. The Company has a net operating loss carryforward of $87,857
available to offset future taxable income through 2020.
F-10
MUST
HAVES, INC.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2009
NOTE 5. SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
The On
December 10, 2009, the Company, iTrackr Acquisition, Inc. (“Merger Sub”)
and iTrackr, Inc., a Florida corporation (“iTrackr”), entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Merger (the “Agreement”), which closed January 12, 2010. On the
Closing Date, iTrackr was merged with and into Merger Sub, which is the
surviving corporation and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant.
The parties have taken all actions necessary to ensure that the Merger is
treated as a tax-free exchange under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.
At the
closing of the Merger, subject to and pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the Agreement, each outstanding share of Purchaser common stock is converted
into one share of common stock of the Registrant. Upon consummation of the
Merger, the shareholders of the Purchaser received an aggregate of 17,875,695
shares of Registrant common stock and thus owned 93.5% of the Registrant’s
common stock. The Registrant also assumed 6,555,000 options and warrants of
iTrackr, which are exercisable at prices from $0.01 to $0.40.
F-11
ITRACKR
SYSTEMS, INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Page
|
||
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accountant
|
F-13
|
|
Balance
Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
F-14
|
|
Statements
of Operations for the Years Ended
|
||
December
31, 2009 and 2008 and the Period May 10, 2006
|
||
(Date
of Inception) to December 31, 2009
|
F-15
|
|
Statements
of Stockholders Equity for the Years Ended
|
||
December
31, 2009 and 2008 and the Period May 10, 2006
|
||
(Inception)
to December 31, 2009
|
F-16
|
|
Statements
of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009
|
||
and
2008 and the Period May 10, 2006 (Date of Inception) to
|
||
December
31, 2009
|
F-17
|
|
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
F-18-F-28
|
F-12
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders
iTrackr,
Inc.
I have
audited the accompanying balance sheets of iTrackr, Inc. (“The Company”) as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of income, stockholders’
deficit, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
company’s management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on my audits. I
conducted my audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that I plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. My audit included consideration of internal
control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that
are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, I express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my
audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of iTrackr, Inc. as of December 31,
2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will
continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered recurring
losses and has yet to generate an internal cash flow that raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s
plans in regard to these matters are described in Note A. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Traci J. Anderson
|
|
Traci
J. Anderson, CPA
|
|
Huntersville,
NC
|
|
March
12, 2010
|
F-13
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Balance
Sheet
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 3,223 | $ | 183,144 | ||||
Accounts
receivable
|
5,786 | - | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
- | - | ||||||
Total
Current Assets
|
9,009 | 183,144 | ||||||
Fixed
assets (Note B)
|
206,211 | 107,357 | ||||||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(106,856 | ) | (73,347 | ) | ||||
Net
fixed assets
|
99,355 | 34,010 | ||||||
Other
assets (Note C)
|
- | 138,000 | ||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 108,364 | $ | 355,154 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholder's
Equity
|
||||||||
Current Liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable & accrued expenses (Note D)
|
$ | 524,777 | $ | 356,755 | ||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
102 | 60,419 | ||||||
Convertible
promissory notes (Note E)
|
25,000 | 1,033,000 | ||||||
Promissory
notes - related party (Note E)
|
151,312 | 110,000 | ||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
701,191 | 1,560,174 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities
|
701,191 | 1,560,174 | ||||||
Stockholder's Equity (Deficit)(Note
F)
|
||||||||
Common
stock, par value $.001, 110,000,000 shares authorized;
|
||||||||
issued
and outstanding 13,990,413 at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
13,991 | 13,991 | ||||||
Common
stock payable
|
1,451,979 | 7,013 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
966,157 | 941,988 | ||||||
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
(3,024,954 | ) | (2,168,012 | ) | ||||
Total
Stockholder's Equity (deficit)
|
(592,827 | ) | (1,205,020 | ) | ||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity (Deficit)
|
$ | 108,364 | $ | 355,154 |
SEE NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-14
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Statements
of Operation
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the Period May 10, 2006 (Inception)
to
December
31, 2009
May 10, 2006
|
||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31,
|
(Inception) to
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 7,493 | $ | 4,419 | $ | 29,330 | ||||||
Operating Expenses
|
||||||||||||
Personnel
|
390,984 | 573,910 | 1,326,796 | |||||||||
Professional
fees
|
84,345 | 384,942 | 817,266 | |||||||||
Stock
compensation
|
31,669 | 206,936 | 603,357 | |||||||||
Travel
and entertainment
|
- | 9,514 | 39,547 | |||||||||
Facilities
|
- | 17,550 | 30,238 | |||||||||
Communications
|
9,089 | 4,779 | 19,102 | |||||||||
Marketing
|
4,796 | 19,523 | 49,865 | |||||||||
Website
|
41,286 | 18,186 | 126,495 | |||||||||
Depreciation
|
33,508 | 34,947 | 106,856 | |||||||||
General
|
15,296 | 4,431 | 29,278 | |||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
610,973 | 1,274,718 | 3,148,800 | |||||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(603,480 | ) | (1,270,299 | ) | (3,119,470 | ) | ||||||
Other Income and (Expense)
|
||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(90,462 | ) | (58,574 | ) | (176,217 | ) | ||||||
Other
expense
|
(163,000 | ) | - | (173,000 | ) | |||||||
Other
income
|
- | - | 443,733 | |||||||||
Total
other income and (expense)
|
(253,462 | ) | (58,574 | ) | 94,516 | |||||||
NET
LOSS
|
(856,942 | ) | (1,328,873 | ) | (3,024,954 | ) | ||||||
Net
loss per common share basic and diluted
|
$ | (0.059 | ) | $ | (0.095 | ) | ||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||
basic
and diluted
|
14,632,513 | 13,934,023 | ||||||||||
The
average shares listed below were not included in the computation of
diluted losses per share because to do so would have been antidilutive for
the periods presented:
|
||||||||||||
Warrants
|
1,050,000 | 741,233 | ||||||||||
Stock
options
|
5,255,000 | 6,509,795 | ||||||||||
Convertible
promissory notes
|
3,242 | 1,305,843 |
SEE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-15
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Statement
of Stockholder's Equity
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the Period May 10, 2006 (Inception)
to December 31, 2009
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Additional
|
during the
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of
|
Paid-in
|
Developmental
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Payable
|
Capital
|
Stage
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||||||||
BALANCES
December 31, 2007
|
$ | 13,790,413 | $ | 13,791 | $ | - | $ | 742,265 | $ | (839,139 | ) | $ | (83,083 | ) | ||||||||||
Stock
issued for services
|
200,000 | 200 | 7,013 | 99,800 | 107,013 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock
options expense
|
77,423 | 77,423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants
issued for services
|
22,500 | 22,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (1,328,873 | ) | (1,328,873 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
BALANCES
December 31, 2008
|
13,990,413 | $ | 13,991 | $ | 7,013 | $ | 941,988 | $ | (2,168,012 | ) | $ | (1,205,020 | ) | |||||||||||
Stock
to be issued for conversion of debt
|
1,437,466 | 1,437,466 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for services
|
7,500 | 7,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
options expense
|
24,169 | 24,169 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (856,942 | ) | (856,942 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
BALANCES
December 31, 2009
|
13,990,413 | $ | 13,991 | $ | 1,451,979 | $ | 966,157 | $ | (3,024,954 | ) | $ | (592,827 | ) |
SEE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-16
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Statements
of Cash Flows
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the Period May 10, 2006 (Inception)
to December 31, 2009
May 10, 2006
|
||||||||||||
(Inception) to
|
||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Net
Earnings <loss>
|
$ | (856,942 | ) | $ | (1,328,873 | ) | $ | (3,024,954 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss
|
||||||||||||
to
net cash used by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
33,508 | 34,947 | 106,855 | |||||||||
Asset
impairment
|
138,000 | - | 138,000 | |||||||||
Compensation
expense on fair market value of options issued
|
24,169 | 77,423 | 178,844 | |||||||||
Compensation
expense on fair value of warrants issued
|
- | 22,500 | 22,500 | |||||||||
Common
stock issued for services
|
7,500 | 107,013 | 402,013 | |||||||||
Common
stock issued for accrued interest
|
137,467 | - | 162,771 | |||||||||
Changes
in operating accounts:
|
||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(5,786 | ) | - | (5,786 | ) | |||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
- | 50,000 | - | |||||||||
Other
assets
|
- | (137,250 | ) | (138,000 | ) | |||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
107,705 | 379,690 | 524,879 | |||||||||
CASH
PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
(414,379 | ) | (794,550 | ) | (1,632,878 | ) | ||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Acquisition
of furniture and equipment
|
(98,854 | ) | (5,485 | ) | (206,211 | ) | ||||||
CASH
PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(98,854 | ) | (5,485 | ) | (206,211 | ) | ||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Repayment
of promissory notes
|
- | (45,000 | ) | (45,000 | ) | |||||||
Repayment
of related party notes
|
- | (40,750 | ) | (40,750 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds
from promissory notes
|
292,000 | 968,750 | 1,886,750 | |||||||||
Proceeds
from related party notes
|
41,312 | - | 41,312 | |||||||||
CASH
PROVIDED (USED) BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
333,312 | 883,000 | 1,842,312 | |||||||||
NET
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
|
(179,921 | ) | 82,965 | 3,223 | ||||||||
CASH,
beginning of period
|
183,144 | 100,179 | - | |||||||||
CASH,
end of period
|
$ | 3,223 | $ | 183,144 | $ | 3,223 | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
||||||||||||
CASH
PAID DURING THE YEAR FOR:
|
||||||||||||
Taxes
paid
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Interest
paid
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
NON-CASH
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Value
of Common Stock issued in exchange for services
|
$ | 7,500 | $ | 107,013 | $ | 402,013 | ||||||
Value
of Common Stock issued for accrued interest
|
$ | 137,467 | $ | - | $ | 162,771 | ||||||
Value
of Common Stock issued for debt principle
|
$ | 1,300,000 | $ | - | $ | 1,666,000 |
SEE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-17
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Note A-Organization and
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
iTrackr,
Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on May 10, 2006 to develop, market and
commercialize a product and inventory search application through a social
networking site designed to leverage the best of Internet and Mobile
technologies. We have taken the best of several burgeoning markets,
including eCommerce, social networking and mobile content, and developed what we
believe is a powerful platform that drives value to consumers, retailers and
advertising and marketing firms.
iTrackr
intends to introduce Internet and Mobile social merchandizing technology
platforms. Social merchandizing applies the variety of traditional marketing
practices to promote products and services to a community of individuals via
social networking technologies. iTrackr is similar to MySpace and
Facebook; however, our members’ interests are not in diary or event blogging,
but in the timely location of products and services which can be acquired and
consumed on a local level.
iTrackr
enables consumers to search and track merchandise, letting the consumer know
which retail locations in a local zip code are stocking the queried merchandise,
as well as the comparative prices. In addition, if the item is not in stock, the
consumer can request that iTrackr notify them via mobile text message or email
when the item is delivered to a local retailer and where that retailer is
located.
In 2009,
iTrackr purchased online customers support software technology from Chatstat for
approximately $95,000. iTrackr has launched its customer support chat
software which facilitates real-time customer support and expert advice, and
paid transactions.
Going
Concern
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which
contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. Since inception, the
Company has been engaged primarily in product development. In the
course of funding development activities, the Company has sustained operating
losses since inception and has an accumulated deficit of $3,024,954 and
$2,168,012 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition,
the Company has negative working capital of $667,182 and $1,377,030 at December
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The
Company has and will continue to use significant capital to commercialize its
products. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of
the Company to continue as a going concern. In this regard,
management is proposing to raise any necessary additional funds not provided by
operations through loans or through additional sales of their common
stock. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in
raising this additional capital or in achieving profitable
operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or
amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from this
uncertainty.
Accounting
estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
F-18
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Note A-Organization and
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and cash
equivalents
For
purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid
debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to
be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents may at times exceed
federally insured limits. To minimize this risk, the Company places
its cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality
institutions.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivable are reported at the customers' outstanding balances. The
Company does not have a history of significant bad debt and has not recorded any
allowance for doubtful accounts. Interest is not accrued on overdue
accounts receivable. The Company evaluates receivables on a regular
basis for potential reserve.
Inventories
Inventories
are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a first-in,
first-out method. Management performs periodic assessments to
determine the existence of obsolete, slow moving and non-salable inventories,
and records necessary provisions to reduce such inventories to net realizable
value.
Property and
equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost. Major renewals and improvements are
charged to the asset accounts while replacements, maintenance and repairs, which
do not improve or extend the lives of the respective assets, are
expensed. At the time property and equipment are retired or otherwise
disposed of, the asset and related accumulated depreciation accounts are
relieved of the applicable amounts. Gains or losses from retirements
or sales are credited or charged to income.
Depreciation
of property and equipment is provided on the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets. Accelerated methods of
depreciation of property and equipment are used for income tax
purposes.
Revenue recognition
policy
Revenue
for our services is recognized when all of the following criteria are satisfied:
(i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) the price is
fixed or determinable; (iii) collectibility is reasonably assured; and
(iv) services have been performed.
Deferred
Revenue: Revenue is deferred for any undelivered elements and is recognized upon
product delivery or when the service has been performed.
Cost of
sales
Cost of
sales includes costs related to fulfillment, customer service, commissions,
service personnel, telecommunications and data center costs.
Sales and marketing
costs
Sales and
marketing expenses include advertising expenses, seminar expenses, commissions
and personnel expenses for sales and marketing. Marketing and
advertising costs to promote the Company's products and services are expensed in
the period incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
the Company incurred approximately $4,796 and $19,523, respectively in marketing
and advertising expense.
F-19
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Note A-Organization and
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies
Earnings (Loss) per common
share
The
Company reports both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
share. Basic loss per share is calculated using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding in the period. Diluted loss per
share includes potentially dilutive securities such as outstanding options and
warrants, using the “treasury stock” method and convertible securities using the
“if-converted” method.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which
requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected
future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial
statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are determined based on differences between financial statements and tax basis
of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in
which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change
in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in
the period that includes the enactment date.
The
Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent the Company believes these
assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such
determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative
evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences,
projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial
operations. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax
assets that do not meet the criteria for recognition. In the event
the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize deferred income
tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would make
an adjustment to the valuation allowance which would reduce the provision for
income taxes.
The
Company follows the accounting guidance which provides that a tax benefit from
an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that
the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any
related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical
merits. Income tax provisions must meet a more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized initially and in
subsequent periods. Also included is guidance on measurement,
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition.
Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets
Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets requires that long-lived
assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the historical cost-carrying value of an asset may not be
recovered. The Company assesses recoverability of the carrying value
of an asset by estimating the fair value of the asset. If the fair
value is less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is
recorded equal to the difference between the asset's carrying value and fair
value. The Company has never recognized an impairment
charge.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company accounts for all compensation related to stock, options or warrants
using a fair value based method whereby compensation cost is measured at the
grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service
period, which is usually the vesting period. Stock issued for
compensation is valued using the market price of the stock on the date of the
related agreement. We use the Black-Scholes pricing model to
calculate the fair value of options and warrants issued to both employees and
non-employees. In calculating this fair value, there are certain
assumptions that we use consisting of the expected life of the option, risk-free
interest rate, dividend yield, volatility and forfeiture rate. The
use of a different estimate for any one of these components could have a
material impact on the amount of calculated compensation
expense.
F-20
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Note A-Organization and
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
On July
1, 2009, the FASB officially launched the FASB ASC 105 - Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, which established the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (“the Codification”), as the single official source of
authoritative, nongovernmental, U.S. GAAP, in addition to guidance issued by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Codification is designed to
simplify U.S. GAAP into a single, topically ordered structure. All
guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of
authority. The Codification is effective for interim and annual
periods ending after September 15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company
refers to the Codification in respect of the appropriate accounting standards
throughout this document as “FASB ASC”. Implementation of the
Codification did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
On June
30, 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2009-01 (Topic
105) – Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – amendments based on –
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168 –The FASB Accounting and
Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. Beginning with this Statement the FASB will no longer
issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging
Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting
Standard Updates. This ASU includes FASB Statement No. 168 in its
entirety. While ASU’s will not be considered authoritative in their
own right, they will serve to update the Codification, provide the bases for
conclusions and changes in the Codification, and provide background information
about the guidance. The Codification modifies the GAAP hierarchy to
include only two levels of GAAP: authoritative and
nonauthoritative. ASU No. 2009-01 is effective for financial
statements issued for the interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009, and the Company does not expect any significant financial impact upon
adoption.
In August
2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(Topic 820) – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. This ASU clarifies
the fair market value measurement of liabilities. In circumstances
where a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not
available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or
more of the following techniques: a technique that uses quoted price of the
identical or a similar liability or liabilities when traded as an asset or
assets, or another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of
Topic 820 such as an income or market approach. ASU No. 2009-05 was
effective upon issuance and it did not result in any significant financial
impact on the Company upon adoption.
In
September 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-12 – Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (Topic 820) – Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net
Asset Value per Share (or its equivalent). This ASU permits use of a
practical expedient, with appropriate disclosures, when measuring the fair value
of an alternative investment that does not have a readily determinable fair
value. ASU No. 2009-12 is effective for interim and annual periods
ending after December 15, 2009, with early application
permitted. Since the Company does not currently have any such
investments, it does not anticipate any impact on its financial statements upon
adoption.
F-21
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Note A-Organization and
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements (Continued)
In May
2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 855, “Subsequent Events.” This
Statement addresses accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be
issued. FASB ASC 855 requires disclosure of the date through which an
entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, the date
issued or date available to be issued. The Company adopted this
Statement in the second quarter of 2009. As a result the date through
which the Company has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date
have been disclosed in Note K, Subsequent Events.
In April
2009, the FASB issued an update to FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures,” related to providing guidance on when the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and identifying
transactions that are not orderly. The update clarifies the
methodology to be used to determine fair value when there is no active market or
where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. The
update also reaffirms the objective of fair value measurement, as stated in FASB
ASC 820, which is to reflect how much an asset would be sold in and orderly
transaction, and the need to use judgment to determine if a formerly active
market has become inactive, as well as to determine fair values when markets
have become inactive. The Company adopted this Statement in the
second quarter of 2009 without significant financial impact.
In April
2009, the FASB ASC 320, “Investments – Debt and Equity,” amends current
other-than-temporary guidance for debt securities through increased consistency
in the timing of impairment recognition and enhanced disclosures related to
credit and noncredit components impaired debt securities that are not expected
to be sold. Also, the Statement increases disclosures for both debt
and equity securities regarding expected cash flows, securities with unrealized
losses, and credit losses. The Company adopted this Statement in the
second quarter of 2009 without significant impact to our financial
statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued an update to FASB ASC 825, “Financial Instruments,” to
require interim disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments.” This update enhances consistency in financial reporting
by increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures of those assets and
liabilities falling within the scope of FASB ASC 825. The Company adopted this
update in the second quarter of 2009 without significant impact to the financial
statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued an update to FASB ASC 805, “Business Combinations,” that
clarifies and amends FASB ASC 805, as it applies to all assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from
contingencies. This update addresses initial recognition and
measurement issues, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosures
regarding these assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business
combination. The Company adopted this Statement in the second quarter
of 2009 without significant impact to the financial statements.
In
November 2008, EITF issued new guidance under FASB ASC 350, “Intangibles –
Goodwill and Other on accounting for defensive intangible
assets.” The new guidance applies to all acquired intangible assets
in which the acquirer does not intend to actively use the asset but intends to
hold (lock up) the asset to prevent its competitors from obtaining or using the
asset (a defensive asset). This guidance was adopted by the Company
in January 2009 without impact to the financial statements.
F-22
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
Note A-Organization and
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements (Continued)
In May
2008, the FASB issued an update to FASB ASC 470, “Debt,” with respect to
accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon
conversion including partial cash settlement. This update applies to
convertible debt instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash
(or other assets) upon conversion, including partial cash settlement, unless the
embedded conversion option is required to be separately accounted for as a
derivative under FASB ASC 815, “Derivatives and
Hedging.” Additionally, this update specifies that issuers of such
instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in
a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when
interest cost recognized in subsequent periods. The update is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not
currently have any debt instruments for which this update would
apply. This update was adopted in January 2009 without significant
financial impact.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued an update to FASB ASC 805, “Business
Combinations” which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree,
and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to
enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business
combination. SFAS 141R is effective for the Company with respect to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1,
2009. The Company adopted this SFAS in the first quarter of
2009.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued an update to FASB ASC 810, “Consolidation,” which
establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated
net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest,
changes in a parent’s ownership interest, and the valuation of retained
noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160
also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish
between the interests of the parent and the interests of noncontrolling
owners. This update is effective for the Company as of
January 1, 2009. The Company adopted this update in January 2009
without significant impact on the consolidated financial position, results of
operations, and disclosures.
NOTE B – PROPERTY AND
EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment consisted of the following:
December 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Computers
and office equipment
|
$ | 127,237 | $ | 78,974 | ||||
Software
|
78,974 | 28,383 | ||||||
Total
PP&E
|
206,211 | 107,357 | ||||||
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(106,856 | ) | (73,347 | ) | ||||
Fixed
assets, net
|
$ | 99,355 | $ | 34,010 |
During
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company purchased $5,485 of computer
equipment.
F-23
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
NOTE B – PROPERTY AND
EQUIPMENT (Continued)
During
the year Ended December 31, 2009, the Company purchased $98,854 of software. On
November 16, 2009, the Company and ChatStat Technologies Incorporated
(“ChatStat”) entered into an agreement whereby the Company acquired a copy of
the source code and documentation to the ChatStat “Live Chat Software” and owns
the copy “separately, globally and mutually until the end of
time”. In exchange for the software ownership, the Company agreed to
forgive $34,861 of debt owing the Company by ChatStat and to pay ChatStat
$60,000 in 6 equal monthly installments beginning November 20,
2009.
Depreciation
expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $33,509 and $34,947,
respectively. Depreciation expense from May 10, 2006 (Inception) to
December 31, 2008 was $106,856.
NOTE C – OTHER
ASSETS
On
December 22, 2008, for $138,000, the Company purchased approximately 79% of the
then issued and outstanding common stock, or 33,400,000 shares of Inflot
Holdings, Inc. a Pink Sheet listed public company. Inflot had no
assets or liabilities as of the date of purchase. The purpose of the
stock purchase was to gain control of a shell company for the purpose of reverse
merging with the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2009,
Inflot executed a 1,000:1 reverse split and subsequently issued 7.5 million
shares thereby significantly diluting the value of the Company’s investment
which was written off during the third quarter of 2009.
NOTE D – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2009 consisted of $389,500 of
accrued payroll, $25,000 of accrued legal settlements, $15,126 of professional
services, and $85,658 of trade payables.
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2008 consisted of $310,189 of
accrued payroll, and $46,566 of trade payables.
NOTE E –
NOTES
Promissory
Notes
Promissory
notes at December 31, 2009 are as follows:
Note
payable convertible into common stock at a conversion price of $.35 upon
default, bears interest at 9% per year, matures March 14,
2010
|
$ | 12,500 | ||
Note
payable convertible into common stock at a conversion price of $.35 upon
default, bears interest at 9% per year, matures March 15,
2010
|
12,500 | |||
Total
|
$ | 25,000 |
During
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received $818,000 of convertible
promissory notes and repaid $45,000.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company received $292,000 of convertible
promissory notes from third parties. The Company converted $1,300,000
of principle and $137,467 of accrued interest into 3,721,257 shares of
restricted common stock.
F-24
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
NOTE E – NOTES
(Continued)
Promissory Notes - Related
Party
Note
payable convertible into common (conversion price of 50% below the
previous 10 day average closing price) upon default, bears interest at 9%
per year, matures December 31, 2010
|
$ | 151,312 |
During
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received $150,750 from Bluewater
Advisors a company owned my John Rizzo, CEO. $40,750 was
repaid.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company received $25,000 from Bluewater
Advisors and issued a new note for $151,312 or $135,000 of principle and $16,312
of accrued interest.
Accrued
Interest
During
the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the period May 10, 2006
(Inception) to December 31, 2009, the Company incurred $90,462, $58,574 and
$176,217, respectively, of interest expense related to convertible promissory
notes and related party promissory notes below.
As of
December 31, 2009, accrued interest payable and the principle of our notes are
$102 and $176,312, respectively.
NOTE F – STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
Preferred
Stock
The
Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares preferred stock available for
issuance. No shares of preferred stock have been issued as of
December 31, 2009.
Stock Issued for Debt
Repayment
During
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company did not issue any stock for debt
repayment.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company converted $1,300,000 of principle
and $137,467 of accrued interest into 3,721,257 shares of restricted common
stock. As of December 31, 2009 the stock had not been issued and is
recorded in the equity portion of our balance sheet as common stock
payable.
Stock Issued for
Services
During
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company issued 214,025 shares in exchange
for services valued at $107,013.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 150,000 shares in exchange
for services valued at $7,500. As of December 31, 2009 the stock had
not been issued and is recorded in the equity portion of our balance sheet as
common stock payable.
Stock Options (See footnote
I)
During
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company granted 2 million Common Stock
options with an exercise price of $0.50 and canceled 1 million due to
termination.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company canceled 1 million options due to
termination.
F-25
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
NOTE G -
COMMITMENTS
The
Company has no commitments as of December 31, 2009.
NOTE H –
WARRANTS
At
December 31, 2009, the Company had 800,000 Warrants outstanding entitling the
holder thereof the right to purchase one share of common stock for each warrant
held as follows:
Exercise
|
||||||||||
Issuance
|
Number of
|
Price Per
|
Expiration
|
|||||||
Date
|
Warrants
|
Warrant
|
Date
|
|||||||
03/25/08
|
400,000 | $ | 0.10 |
12/31/10
|
||||||
03/25/08
|
400,000 | $ | 0.10 |
12/31/10
|
||||||
Total
|
800,000 |
During
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company issued 1,050,000 warrants to
outside individuals. The warrants issued on March 25, 2008 were fully
vested on the date of grant. No compensation expense was recognized
for these warrants as the strike price and the spot price were both $0.10 on the
date of grant. The 250,000 warrant grant had a three month vesting
period and fair value was calculated using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing
Model with the following inputs: volatility of 214.65% based on the Dow Jones
Internet Composite Index, risk free interest rate of 3.99%, spot price of $0.10,
and exercise price of $0.01 resulting in $22,500 of expense during the year
ended December 31, 2008.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company canceled 250,000 warrants issued
to Marc Falcone as a result of the settlement agreement dated February 16, 2010
(See Note K, Subsequent Events). No warrants were issued or exercised
in 2009.
NOTE I – 2007 LONG-TERM
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
In June
2007 the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the 2007 Long-Term Equity
Incentive Plan. The purpose of this Plan is to attract and retain directors,
officers and other employees of iTrackr, Inc. and its Subsidiaries and to
provide to such persons incentives and rewards for performance.
The
Company may issue each of the following under this Plan: Incentive Option,
Nonqualified Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Award or
Performance Stock Award. The Plan was ratified at the 2007
shareholder’s meeting (the "Effective Date"). No Incentive Option,
Nonqualified Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Award or
Performance Stock Award shall be granted pursuant to the Plan ten years after
the Effective Date. The total number of shares available under the
Plan is Fifteen Million (15,000,000). No Plan participant will be
granted the right, in the aggregate, for more than Two Million
(2,000,000) Common Shares during any calendar year.
F-26
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
NOTE I – 2007 LONG-TERM
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN (Continued)
Stock
Options
During
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company granted 2 million Common Stock
options with an exercise price of $0.50. Of these grants, 1 million
were canceled due to termination of the people to whom they were granted and
their failure to exercise according to the terms of the option
grant. Expense
related to these grants was based on their fair value as calculated using the
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following inputs: volatility of
214.65% based on the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, risk free interest rate
of 3.49%, spot price of $0.50, and exercise price of $0.50.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009 1 million options were canceled due termination
of the people to whom they were granted and their failure to exercise according
to the terms of the option grant.
The
following table summarizes the Company's stock option activity for the year
ended December 31, 2009:
2009
|
||||||||
Weighted
Average
|
||||||||
Shares
|
Exercise Price
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
6,255,000 | $ | 0.23 | |||||
Granted
|
- | - | ||||||
Forfeited
|
(1,000,000 | ) | 0.50 | |||||
Exercised
|
- | - | ||||||
Outstanding
at end of quarter
|
5,255,000 | $ | 0.18 | |||||
Options
exerciseable at December 31, 2009
|
5,255,000 |
The
following table summarizes information about the Company's stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2009:
Options Outstanding
|
Options Exercisable
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Number
|
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
||||||||||||||||||
Range of
|
Outstanding
|
Average
|
Average
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||
Exercise
|
At December 31,
|
Contractural
|
Exercise
|
Number
|
Exercise
|
||||||||||||||||
Prices
|
2009
|
Life (years)
|
Price
|
Outstanding
|
Price
|
||||||||||||||||
$ |
0.40
|
1,000,000 | - | $ | 0.40 | 1,000,000 | $ | 0.08 | |||||||||||||
0.25
|
1,000,000 | - | 0.25 | 1,000,000 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||
0.10
|
2,375,000 | - | 0.10 | 2,375,000 | 0.05 | ||||||||||||||||
0.05
|
880,000 | - | 0.05 | 880,000 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | 5,255,000 | - | $ | 0.18 | 5,255,000 | $ | 0.18 |
The
Company measures the fair market value of stock options granted using the
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model on the date of grant and recognizes related
compensation expense ratably over the options vesting period for all future
grants.
During
the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized $24,169 and
$77,423, respectively, of compensation expense related to stock
options. From inception to date, the Company has recognized $178,844
of compensation expense related to stock options.
F-27
iTrackr,
Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
For
the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
NOTE J – LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
As of
December 31, 2009, the Company was party to a lawsuit brought by Marc
Falcone. In this action, Mr. Falcone asserted numerous claims against
certain defendants arising out of his former service to iTrackr, Inc. as a
contracted consultant. The Company asserted numerous defenses and
affirmative defenses, including, but not limited to, the fact that Falcone
failed to fulfill his obligations under the agreement. On February
16, 2010, the Company and Mr. Falcone executed a settlement agreement without
either side admitting fault. The terms of the settlement agreement
call for the payment of $25,000 and the issuance of 360,000 shares of common
stock in exchange for a full release of all claims. The Company has
accrued $25,000 as of December 31, 2009 and canceled the 250,000 warrants with
exercise price f $.01 as a result of this liability.
NOTE K – SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
On
December 10, 2009, Must Haves, Inc., iTrackr Acquisition, Inc. and iTrackr,
Inc. entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger which closed January 12,
2010. On the Closing Date, iTrackr was merged with and into iTrackr
Acquisition, Inc. which is the surviving corporation and became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Must Haves, Inc. In accordance with the merger
agreement, iTrackr’s stockholder’s received restricted common stock at the rate
of 1:1 share for each of their 17,875,695 shares issued and outstanding in
exchange for 100 percent of the outstanding capital stock of
iTrackr. In total 19,169,333 shares are outstanding following the
closing of the merger.
The
Merger is being accounted for as a “reverse merger”. iTrackr is
deemed to be the acquirer in the reverse merger. Consequently, the assets
and liabilities and retained deficit of iTrackr prior to the Merger will be
reflected in the financial statements.
In
January 2010, in conjunction with two promissory notes totaling $25,000 that
were issued on December 14th and
15th
(See Note E), and $7,000 loaned to the Company in January 2010, the Company
issued 96,000 warrants to purchase an equal amount of shares of common
stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $.75 and expire five
years from the date of issue. The Company did not record expense
related to these warrants as their strike price significantly exceeds the
current fair value of the Company’s common stock.
On
February 16, 2010, the Company, without admitting fault, entered into a
settlement agreement to settle a dispute with Marc Falcone over unpaid salary
and stock (See Note J, Legal Proceedings).
F-28