Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
10-K - FORM 10-K - EMS TECHNOLOGIES INC | g22130e10vk.htm |
EX-3.2 - EX-3.2 - EMS TECHNOLOGIES INC | g22130exv3w2.htm |
EX-4.1 - EX-4.1 - EMS TECHNOLOGIES INC | g22130exv4w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - EMS TECHNOLOGIES INC | g22130exv31w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - EMS TECHNOLOGIES INC | g22130exv31w1.htm |
EX-21.1 - EX-21.1 - EMS TECHNOLOGIES INC | g22130exv21w1.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - EMS TECHNOLOGIES INC | g22130exv32w1.htm |
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - EMS TECHNOLOGIES INC | g22130exv10w1.htm |
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - EMS TECHNOLOGIES INC | g22130exv23w1.htm |
Exhibit 18
March 31, 2010
EMS Technologies, Inc.
Norcross, Georgia
Norcross, Georgia
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of EMS Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and have reported thereon under date of March 31, 2010.
The aforementioned consolidated financial statements and our audit report thereon are included in
the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. As stated in Note 1
to those financial statements, the Company changed its annual goodwill impairment testing date in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350, Intangibles Goodwill and Other, from December 31 to the first
day of the Companys twelfth reporting period in the fiscal year and states that the newly adopted
accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because it provides additional time prior
to the Companys year-end to complete the goodwill impairment testing and report the results in its
annual report on Form 10-K. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with
Company officials the circumstances and business judgment and planning upon which the decision to
make this change in the method of accounting was based.
With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have not been
established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another
acceptable method. However, for purposes of the Companys compliance with the requirements of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this letter.
Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on managements business judgment and planning,
we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is preferable in the Companys circumstances.
Very truly yours,
/s/ KPMG LLP