Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32 - EXHIBIT 32 - CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INC | c98268exv32.htm |
EX-23.1 - EXHIBIT 23.1 - CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INC | c98268exv23w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INC | c98268exv31w1.htm |
EX-21.1 - EXHIBIT 21.1 - CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INC | c98268exv21w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INC | c98268exv31w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 000-25771
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
13-3951476 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
50 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York (Address of principal executive offices) |
10020 (Zip code) |
Registrants telephone numbers, including area code:
Investor Relations (212) 492-8920
(212) 492-1100
Investor Relations (212) 492-8920
(212) 492-1100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, Par Value $0.001 Per Share
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, Par Value $0.001 Per Share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K
(§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
Registrant has no active market for its common stock. Non-affiliates held 86,801,034 shares of
common stock at June 30, 2009.
As of March 18, 2010, there were 86,445,396 shares of common stock of registrant outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The registrant incorporates by reference its definitive Proxy Statement with respect to its
2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within
120 days following the end of its fiscal year, into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No. | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
10 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
83 | ||||||||
83 | ||||||||
83 | ||||||||
84 | ||||||||
84 | ||||||||
84 | ||||||||
84 | ||||||||
84 | ||||||||
84 | ||||||||
86 | ||||||||
Exhibit 21.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 23.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32 |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 of Part II of this Report, contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements
generally are identified by the words believe, project, expect, anticipate, estimate,
intend, strategy, plan, may, should, will, would, will be, will continue, will
likely result, and similar expressions. It is important to note that our actual results could be
materially different from those projected in such forward-looking statements. You should exercise
caution in relying on forward-looking statements as they involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may materially affect our future results, performance,
achievements or transactions. Information on factors which could impact actual results and cause
them to differ from what is anticipated in the forward-looking statements contained herein is
included in this report as well as in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC), including but not limited to those described below in Item 1A. Risk Factors of this
Report. We do not undertake to revise or update any forward-looking statements. Additionally, a
description of our critical accounting estimates is included in the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this Report.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 1
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. | Business. |
(a) General Development of Business
Overview
Corporate Property Associates 14 Incorporated (together with its consolidated subsidiaries and
predecessors, we, us or our) is a publicly owned, non-actively traded real estate investment
trust (REIT) that primarily invests in commercial properties leased to companies domestically and
internationally. As a REIT, we are not subject to United States (U.S.) federal income taxation as
long as we satisfy certain requirements, principally relating to the nature of our income, the
level of our distributions and other factors.
Our core investment strategy is to own and manage a portfolio of properties leased to a diversified
group of companies on a single tenant net lease basis. Our net leases generally require the tenant
to pay substantially all of the costs associated with operating and maintaining the property such
as maintenance, insurance, taxes, structural repairs and other operating expenses. Leases of this
type are referred to as triple-net leases. We generally seek to include in our leases:
| clauses providing for mandated rent increases or periodic rent increases over the term of the lease tied to increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or other similar indices for the jurisdiction in which the property is located or, when appropriate, increases tied to the volume of sales at the property; |
| indemnification for environmental and other liabilities; |
| operational or financial covenants of the tenant; and |
| guarantees of lease obligations from parent companies or letters of credit. |
We are managed by W. P. Carey & Co. LLC (WPC) through certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(collectively, the advisor). WPC is a publicly-traded company listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol WPC.
The advisor provides both strategic and day-to-day management services for us, including capital
funding services, investment research and analysis, investment financing and other investment
related services, asset management, disposition of assets, investor relations and administrative
services. The advisor also provides office space and other facilities for us. We pay asset
management fees and certain transactional fees to the advisor and also reimburse the advisor for
certain expenses incurred in providing services, including personnel provided for the
administration of our operations. The advisor also serves in this capacity currently for other
REITs that it formed under the Corporate Property Associates brand: Corporate Property Associates
15 Incorporated (CPA®:15), Corporate Property Associates 16 Global Incorporated
(CPA®:16 Global) and Corporate Property Associates 17 Global Incorporated
(CPA®:17 Global, collectively, including us, the CPA® REITs.
We were formed as a Maryland corporation in June 1997. Between November 1997 and November 2001, we
sold a total of 65,794,280 shares of common stock for a total of $657.9 million in gross offering
proceeds. Through December 31, 2009, we have also issued 4,355,363 shares ($54.1 million) through
our distribution reinvestment and stock purchase plan. These proceeds were used along with
non-recourse mortgage debt to purchase our properties. We have repurchased 8,955,254 shares ($105.4
million) of our common stock under a redemption plan from inception through December 31, 2009. We
suspended our redemption plan on September 1, 2009 (see Significant Developments during 2009
below).
Our principal executive offices are located at 50 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10020 and our
telephone number is (212) 492-1100. We have no employees. The advisor employs 156 individuals who
are available to perform services for us.
Significant Developments during 2009 include:
Impairment Charges During 2009, we incurred impairment charges totaling $41.0 million to reduce
the carrying value of certain of our real estate investments to their estimated fair value, of
which $37.8 million related to properties whose tenants initiated bankruptcy proceedings.
Redemption Plan In September 2009, as a result of redemptions nearing the 5% limitation under
the terms of our redemption plan and our desire to preserve capital and liquidity, our board of
directors suspended our redemption plan, effective for all redemption requests received subsequent
to September 1, 2009, with limited exceptions in cases of death or disability. The suspension will
remain in effect until our board of directors, in its discretion, determines to reinstate the plan.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 2
Table of Contents
Net Asset Values As a result of the overall continued weakness in the economy during 2009, our
estimated net asset value per share as of December 31, 2009 decreased to $11.80, a 9.2% decline
from our December 31, 2008 estimated net asset value per share of $13.00.
(b) Financial Information About Segments
We operate in one industry segment, real estate ownership, with domestic and foreign investments.
Refer to the Segment Information footnote in the consolidated financial statements for financial
information about this segment.
(c) Narrative Description of Business
Business Objectives and Strategy
We invest primarily in income-producing commercial real estate properties that are, upon
acquisition, improved or developed or that will be developed within a reasonable time after
acquisition.
Our objectives are to:
| own a diversified portfolio of triple-net leased real estate; | ||
| fund distributions to shareholders; and | ||
| increase our equity in our real estate by making regular principal payments on mortgage loans for our properties. |
We seek to achieve these objectives by investing in and holding commercial properties that are
generally triple-net leased to a single corporate tenant. We intend our portfolio to be diversified
by tenant, facility type, geographic location and tenant industry.
Our business plan is principally focused on managing our existing portfolio of properties,
including those properties we acquired from Corporate Property Associates 12 Incorporated
(CPA®:12) through a merger transaction in December 2006 (the Merger). This may
include looking to selectively dispose of properties, obtaining new non-recourse mortgage financing
on unencumbered assets or refinancing existing mortgage loans on properties if we can obtain such
financing on attractive terms.
Our Portfolio
At December 31, 2009, our portfolio was comprised of our full or partial ownership interests in 314
properties, substantially all of which were triple-net leased to 88 tenants, and totaled
approximately 29 million square feet (on a pro rata basis) with an occupancy rate of approximately
95%. Our portfolio had the following property and lease characteristics:
Geographic Diversification
Information regarding the geographic diversification of our properties at December 31, 2009 is set
forth below (dollars in thousands):
Consolidated Investments | Equity Investments in Real Estate(b) | |||||||||||||||
Annualized | % of Annualized | Annualized | % of Annualized | |||||||||||||
Contractual Lease | Contractual | Contractual Lease | Contractual | |||||||||||||
Region | Revenue(a) | Lease Revenue | Revenue(a) | Lease Revenue | ||||||||||||
United States |
||||||||||||||||
East |
$ | 38,687 | 25 | % | $ | 4,036 | 8 | % | ||||||||
Midwest |
32,712 | 21 | 8,352 | 17 | ||||||||||||
South |
28,628 | 19 | 11,200 | 23 | ||||||||||||
West |
27,023 | 18 | 13,115 | 27 | ||||||||||||
Total U.S. |
127,050 | 83 | 36,703 | 75 | ||||||||||||
International |
||||||||||||||||
Europe (c) |
26,816 | 17 | 12,291 | 25 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 153,866 | 100 | % | $ | 48,994 | 100 | % | ||||||||
(a) | Reflects annualized contractual minimum base rent for the fourth quarter of 2009. |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 3
Table of Contents
(b) | Reflects our pro rata share of annualized contractual minimum base rent for the fourth quarter of 2009 from equity investments in real estate. | |
(c) | Reflects investments in Finland, France, Germany, and the Netherlands. |
Property Diversification
Information regarding our property diversification at December 31, 2009 is set forth below (dollars
in thousands):
Consolidated Investments | Equity Investments in Real Estate(b) | |||||||||||||||
Annualized | % of Annualized | Annualized | % of Annualized | |||||||||||||
Contractual Lease | Contractual | Contractual Lease | Contractual | |||||||||||||
Property Type | Revenue(a) | Lease Revenue | Revenue(a) | Lease Revenue | ||||||||||||
Industrial |
$ | 49,660 | 32 | % | $ | 13,335 | 27 | % | ||||||||
Warehouse/distribution |
46,829 | 30 | 8,655 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Office |
29,881 | 19 | 5,758 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Retail |
15,802 | 10 | 11,624 | 24 | ||||||||||||
Other properties (c) |
11,694 | 9 | 9,622 | 19 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 153,866 | 100 | % | $ | 48,994 | 100 | % | ||||||||
(a) | Reflects annualized contractual minimum base rent for the fourth quarter of 2009. | |
(b) | Reflects our pro rata share of annualized contractual minimum base rent for the fourth quarter of 2009 from equity investments in real estate. | |
(c) | Other properties include education and childcare and leisure; movie theaters; sports/fitness; and storage/trucking facilities, as well as undeveloped land. |
Tenant Diversification
Information regarding our tenant diversification at December 31, 2009 is set forth below (dollars
in thousands):
Consolidated Investments | Equity Investments in Real Estate(c) | |||||||||||||||
Annualized | % of Annualized | Annualized | % of Annualized | |||||||||||||
Contractual Lease | Contractual | Contractual Lease | Contractual | |||||||||||||
Tenant Industry(a) | Revenue(b) | Lease Revenue | Revenue(b) | Lease Revenue | ||||||||||||
Retail trade |
$ | 42,217 | 27 | % | $ | 15,189 | 31 | % | ||||||||
Electronics |
18,209 | 12 | 10,795 | 22 | ||||||||||||
Automobile |
16,529 | 11 | | | ||||||||||||
Transportation cargo |
12,104 | 8 | | | ||||||||||||
Construction and building |
10,759 | 7 | 6,691 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Leisure, amusement, entertainment |
8,872 | 6 | 5,811 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Beverages, food, and tobacco |
7,282 | 5 | 1,763 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Consumer non-durable goods |
6,421 | 4 | | | ||||||||||||
Business and commercial services |
5,977 | 4 | 2,474 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Chemicals, plastics, rubber, and
glass |
5,412 | 4 | | | ||||||||||||
Machinery |
4,491 | 3 | | | ||||||||||||
Healthcare, education and childcare |
4,472 | 3 | | | ||||||||||||
Media: printing and publishing |
2,286 | 1 | 1,597 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Buildings and real estate |
| | 2,437 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Other (d) |
8,835 | 5 | 2,237 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 153,866 | 100 | % | $ | 48,994 | 100 | % | ||||||||
(a) | Based on the Moodys Investors Service, Inc. classification system and information provided by the tenant. | |
(b) | Reflects annualized contractual minimum base rent for the fourth quarter of 2009. | |
(c) | Reflects our pro rata share of annualized contractual minimum base rent for the fourth quarter of 2009 from equity investments in real estate. |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 4
Table of Contents
(d) | Other includes revenue from tenants in our consolidated investments in the following industries: aerospace and defense (1%); consumer and durable goods (1%); forest products and paper (1%); hotels and gaming (1%); mining (1%) and banking (less than 1%). For our equity investments in real estate, other consists of revenue from tenants in the following industries: personal transportation (3%) and grocery (1%). |
Lease Expirations
At December 31, 2009, lease expirations of our properties were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Consolidated Investments | Equity Investments in Real Estate(b) | |||||||||||||||
Annualized | % of Annualized | Annualized | % of Annualized | |||||||||||||
Contractual Lease | Contractual | Contractual Lease | Contractual | |||||||||||||
Year of Lease Expiration | Revenue(a) | Lease Revenue | Revenue(a) | Lease Revenue | ||||||||||||
2010 |
$ | 6,229 | 4 | % | $ | | | % | ||||||||
2011 |
6,245 | 4 | | | ||||||||||||
2012 |
722 | | | | ||||||||||||
2013 |
1,223 | 1 | | | ||||||||||||
2014 |
2,400 | 2 | 1,312 | 3 | ||||||||||||
2015 |
23,570 | 15 | 2,474 | 5 | ||||||||||||
2016 |
8,056 | 5 | 1,763 | 4 | ||||||||||||
2017 |
14,691 | 10 | | | ||||||||||||
2018 |
2,810 | 2 | 8,972 | 18 | ||||||||||||
2019 |
17,688 | 11 | 3,347 | 7 | ||||||||||||
2020-2024 |
70,232 | 46 | 13,632 | 28 | ||||||||||||
2025-2029 |
| | 5,202 | 11 | ||||||||||||
2030 and thereafter |
| | 12,292 | 24 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 153,866 | 100 | % | $ | 48,994 | 100 | % | ||||||||
(a) | Reflects annualized contractual minimum base rent for the fourth quarter of 2009. | |
(b) | Reflects our pro rata share of annualized contractual minimum base rent for the fourth quarter of 2009 from equity investments in real estate. |
Asset Management
We believe that effective management of our assets is essential to maintain and enhance property
values. Important aspects of asset management include restructuring transactions to meet the
evolving needs of current tenants, re-leasing properties, refinancing debt, selling assets and
knowledge of the bankruptcy process.
The advisor monitors, on an ongoing basis, compliance by tenants with their lease obligations and
other factors that could affect the financial performance of any of our properties. Monitoring
involves receiving assurances that each tenant has paid real estate taxes, assessments and other
expenses relating to the properties it occupies and confirming that appropriate insurance coverage
is being maintained by the tenant. For international compliance, the advisor also utilizes third
party asset managers for certain investments. The advisor reviews financial statements of our
tenants and undertakes regular physical inspections of the condition and maintenance of our
properties. Additionally, the advisor periodically analyzes each tenants financial condition, the
industry in which each tenant operates and each tenants relative strength in its industry.
Holding Period
We intend to hold each property we invest in for an extended period. The determination of whether a
particular property should be sold or otherwise disposed of will be made after consideration of
relevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, with a view to achieving maximum
capital appreciation for our shareholders or avoiding increases in risk. No assurance can be given
that this objective will be realized.
Our intention is to consider alternatives for providing liquidity for our shareholders generally
commencing eight years following the investment of substantially all of the net proceeds from our
initial public offering, which occurred in 2000. On this basis, in the first quarter of 2008 we
asked our advisor to begin reviewing possible liquidity alternatives for us. However, in light of
deteriorating market conditions during 2008, the advisor recommended, and our board agreed, that
further consideration of liquidity alternatives be postponed until market conditions become more
stable. Although we believe we have recently seen an easing of the global economic and financial
crisis that had severely curbed liquidity in the credit and real estate financing markets, we are
unable to predict when a liquidity event will occur.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 5
Table of Contents
While our board has not made any decisions as to what form any such event might take, we may
provide liquidity for our shareholders through sales of assets, either on a portfolio basis or
individually, a listing of our shares on a stock exchange, a merger (which may include a merger
with one or more of our affiliated CPA® REITs and/or
with the advisor) or another
transaction approved by our board of directors. During the period that we are considering liquidity
alternatives, we may choose to limit new investment activity, unless our board of directors,
including a majority of our independent directors, determines that, in light of our expected life,
it is in our shareholders best interests for us to make new investments. We are under no
obligation to liquidate our portfolio within any particular period since the precise timing will
depend on real estate and financial markets, economic conditions of the areas in which the
properties are located and tax effects on shareholders that may prevail in the
future. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to consummate a liquidity
event. In the most recent instances in which CPA® REIT shareholders were provided with
liquidity, including the Merger with CPA®:12, the liquidating entity merged with
another, later-formed CPA® REIT. In each of these transactions, shareholders of the
liquidating entity were offered the opportunity to exchange their shares for shares of the merged
entity, cash or a short-term note.
Financing Strategies
Consistent with our investment policies, we use leverage when available on favorable terms.
Substantially all of our mortgage loans were non-recourse and provided for monthly or quarterly
installments, which include scheduled payments of principal. At December 31, 2009, 85% of our
mortgage financing bore interest at fixed rates. At December 31,
2009, approximately 80% of our variable rate debt bore interest at
fixed rates that are scheduled to reset in the future, pursuant to the terms of the
mortgage contracts. Accordingly, our near term cash flow should not be adversely affected by
increases in interest rates. The advisor may refinance properties or defease a loan when a decline
in interest rates makes it profitable to prepay an existing mortgage loan, when an existing
mortgage loan matures or if an attractive investment becomes available and the proceeds from the
refinancing can be used to purchase the investment. There is no assurance that existing debt will
be refinanced at lower rates of interest as the debt matures. The benefits of the refinancing may
include an increased cash flow resulting from reduced debt service requirements, an increase in
distributions from proceeds of the refinancing, if any, and/or an increase in property ownership if
some refinancing proceeds are reinvested in real estate. The prepayment of loans may require us to
pay a yield maintenance premium to the lender in order to pay off a loan prior to its maturity.
A lender on non-recourse mortgage debt generally has recourse only to the property collateralizing
such debt and not to any of our other assets, while unsecured financing would give a lender
recourse to all of our assets. The use of non-recourse debt, therefore, helps us to limit the
exposure of our assets to any one debt obligation. Lenders may, however, have recourse to our other
assets in limited circumstances not related to the repayment of the indebtedness, such as under an
environmental indemnity or in the case of fraud. Lenders may also seek to include in the terms of
mortgage loans provisions making the termination or replacement of the advisor an event of default
or an event requiring the immediate repayment of the full outstanding balance of the loan. We will
attempt to negotiate loan terms allowing us to replace or terminate the advisor. Even if we are
successful in negotiating such provisions, the replacement or termination of the advisor may
require the prior consent of the mortgage lenders.
A majority of our financing requires us to make a lump-sum or balloon payment at maturity.
Because of current conditions in the credit market, refinancing at present remains difficult, but
we were able to obtain financing for substantially all of our maturing loans in 2009, despite the
difficult environment. At December 31, 2009, scheduled balloon payments for the next five years
were as follows (in thousands):
2010 |
$ | 66,666 | (a)(b) | |
2011 |
255,794 | (a)(c) | ||
2012 |
151,263 | (a)(c) | ||
2013 |
| (a) | ||
2014 |
15,076 | (a) |
(a) | Excludes our pro rata share of mortgage obligations of equity investments in real estate totaling $4.2 million in 2010, $9.8 million in 2011, $28.9 million in 2012, $32.4 million in 2013 and $16.7 million in 2014. | |
(b) | Of the amount shown, $5.4 million was paid in the first quarter of 2010. | |
(c) | Inclusive of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests totaling $29.3 million in 2011 and $2.5 million in 2012. |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 6
Table of Contents
We are currently seeking to refinance certain of these loans due in 2010 and believe we have
existing cash resources that can be used to make these payments, if necessary.
Investment Strategies
We invest primarily in income-producing properties that are, upon acquisition, improved or being
developed or that are to be developed within a reasonable period after acquisition. While we are
not currently seeking to make new significant investments, we may do so if attractive opportunities
arise.
Most of our properties are subject to long-term net leases and were acquired through sale-leaseback
transactions in which we acquire properties from companies that simultaneously lease the properties
back from us. These sale-leaseback transactions provide the lessee company with a source of capital
that is an alternative to other financing sources such as corporate borrowing, mortgaging real
property, or selling shares of its stock.
Our sale-leaseback transactions may occur in conjunction with acquisitions, recapitalizations or
other corporate transactions. We may act as one of several sources of financing for these
transactions by purchasing real property from the seller and net leasing it back to the seller or
its successor in interest (the lessee).
In analyzing potential net lease investment opportunities, the advisor reviews all aspects of a
transaction, including the creditworthiness of the tenant or borrower and the underlying real
estate fundamentals, to determine whether a potential acquisition satisfies our acquisition
criteria. The advisor generally considers, among other things, the following aspects of each
transaction:
Tenant/Borrower Evaluation The advisor evaluates each potential tenant or borrower for their
creditworthiness, typically considering factors such as management experience, industry position
and fundamentals, operating history, and capital structure, as well as other factors that may be
relevant to a particular investment. The advisor seeks opportunities in which it believes the
tenant may have a stable or improving credit profile or the credit profile has not been recognized
by the market. In evaluating a possible investment, the creditworthiness of a tenant or borrower
often is a more significant factor than the value of the underlying real estate, particularly if
the underlying property is specifically suited to the needs of the tenant; however, in certain
circumstances where the real estate is attractively valued, the creditworthiness of the tenant may
be a secondary consideration. Whether a prospective tenant or borrower is creditworthy will be
determined by the advisors investment department and its investment committee, as described below.
However, creditworthy does not mean investment grade.
Properties Important to Tenant/Borrower Operations The advisor generally focuses on properties
that it believes are essential or important to the ongoing operations of the tenant. The advisor
believes that these properties provide better protection generally as well as in the event of a
bankruptcy, since a tenant/borrower is less likely to risk the loss of a critically important lease
or property in a bankruptcy proceeding or otherwise.
Diversification The advisor attempts to diversify our portfolio to avoid dependence on any one
particular tenant, borrower, collateral type, geographic location or tenant/borrower industry. By
diversifying our portfolio, the advisor seeks to reduce the adverse effect of a single
under-performing investment or a downturn in any particular industry or geographic region.
Lease Terms Generally, the net leased properties in which we invest will be leased on a full
recourse basis to our tenants or their affiliates. In addition, the advisor generally seeks to
include a clause in each lease that provides for increases in rent over the term of
the lease. These increases are fixed or tied to increases in indices such as the CPI, or other
similar indices in the jurisdiction in which the property is located, but may contain caps or other
limitations either on an annual or overall basis. Further, in some jurisdictions (notably Germany),
these clauses must provide for rent adjustments based on increases or decreases in the relevant
index. In the case of retail stores and hotels, the lease may provide for participation in gross
revenues above a stated level. Alternatively, a lease may provide for mandated rental increases on
specific dates or other methods.
Collateral Evaluation The advisor reviews the physical condition of the property and conducts a
market evaluation to determine the likelihood of replacing the rental stream if the tenant defaults
or of a sale of the property in such circumstances. The advisor will also generally engage third
parties to conduct, or requires the seller to conduct, Phase I or similar environmental site
assessments (including a visual inspection for the potential presence of asbestos) in an attempt to
identify potential environmental liabilities associated with a property prior to its acquisition.
If potential environmental liabilities are identified, the advisor generally requires that
identified environmental issues be resolved by the seller prior to property acquisition or, where
such issues cannot be resolved prior to acquisition, requires tenants contractually to assume
responsibility for resolving identified environmental issues post-closing
and provide indemnification protections against any potential claims, losses or expenses
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 7
Table of Contents
arising from such
matters. Although the advisor generally relies on its own analysis in determining whether to make
an investment, each real property to be purchased by us will be appraised by an independent
appraiser. The contractual purchase price (plus acquisition fees, but excluding acquisition
expenses, payable to the advisor) for a real property we acquire will not exceed its appraised
value, unless approved by our independent directors. The appraisals may take into consideration,
among other things, the terms and conditions of the particular lease transaction, the quality of
the lessees credit and the conditions of the credit markets at the time the lease transaction is
negotiated. The appraised value may be greater than the construction cost or the replacement cost
of a property, and the actual sale price of a property if sold by us may be greater or less than
the appraised value. In cases of special purpose real estate, a property is examined in light of
the prospects for the tenant/borrowers enterprise and the financial strength and the role of that
asset in the context of the tenant/borrowers overall viability. Operating results of properties
and other collateral may be examined to determine whether or not projected income levels are likely
to be met.
Transaction Provisions to Enhance and Protect Value The advisor attempts to include provisions
in our leases it believes may help protect our investment from changes in the operating and
financial characteristics of a tenant that may affect its ability to satisfy its obligations to us
or reduce the value of our investment, such as requiring our consent to specified tenant activity,
requiring the tenant to provide indemnification protections, and requiring the tenant to satisfy
specific operating tests. The advisor may also seek to enhance the likelihood of a tenants lease
obligations being satisfied through a guarantee of obligations from the tenants corporate parent
or other entity or a letter of credit. This credit enhancement, if obtained, provides us with
additional financial security. However, in markets where competition for net lease transactions is
strong, some or all of these provisions may be difficult to negotiate. In addition, in some
circumstances, tenants may retain the right to repurchase the property leased by the tenant. The
option purchase price is generally the greater of the contract purchase price or the fair market
value of the property at the time the option is exercised.
Other Equity Enhancements The advisor may attempt to obtain equity enhancements in connection
with transactions. These equity enhancements may involve warrants exercisable at a future time to
purchase stock of the tenant or borrower or their parent. If warrants are obtained, and become
exercisable, and if the value of the stock subsequently exceeds the exercise price of the warrant,
equity enhancements can help us to achieve our goal of increasing investor returns.
Investment Decisions The advisors investment department, under the oversight of its chief
investment officer, is primarily responsible for evaluating, negotiating and structuring potential
investment opportunities for the CPA® REITs and WPC. Before an investment is made, the
transaction is reviewed by the advisors investment committee. The investment committee is not
directly involved in originating or negotiating potential investments but instead functions as a
separate and final step in the acquisition process. The advisor places special emphasis on having
experienced individuals serve on its investment committee. The advisor generally will not invest in
a transaction on our behalf unless it is approved by the investment committee, except that
investments with a total purchase price of $10 million or less may be approved by either the
chairman of the investment committee or the advisors chief investment officer (up to, in the case
of investments other than long-term net leases, a cap of $30 million or 5% of our estimated net
asset value, whichever is greater, provided that such investments may not have a credit rating of
less than BBB-). For transactions that meet the investment criteria of more than one
CPA® REIT, the chief investment officer has discretion to allocate the investment to or
among the REITs. In cases where two or more CPA® REITs (or one or more of the
CPA® REITs and the advisor) will hold the investment, a majority of the independent
directors of each CPA® REIT investing in the property must also approve the transaction.
The following people currently serve on the investment committee:
| Nathaniel S. Coolidge, Chairman Former senior vice president and head of the bond and corporate finance department of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance (currently known as John Hancock Life Insurance Company). Mr. Coolidges responsibilities included overseeing its entire portfolio of fixed income investments. | |
| Trevor P. Bond Co-founder of Credit Suisses real estate equity group. Currently managing member of private investment vehicle, Maidstone Investment Co., LLC. | |
| Axel K.A. Hansing Currently serving as a senior partner at Coller Capital, Ltd., a global leader in the private equity secondary market, and responsible for investment activity in parts of Europe, Turkey and South Africa. | |
| Frank J. Hoenemeyer Former vice chairman and chief investment officer of the Prudential Insurance Company of America. As chief investment officer, he was responsible for all of Prudential Insurance Company of Americas investments including stocks, bonds and real estate. |
| Dr. Lawrence R. Klein Currently serving as professor emeritus of economics and finance at the University of Pennsylvania and its Wharton School. Recipient of the 1980 Nobel Prize in economic sciences and former consultant to both the Federal Reserve Board and the Presidents Council of Economic Advisors. |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 8
Table of Contents
| Nick J.M. van Ommen Former chief executive officer of the European Public Real Estate Association promoting, developing and representing the European public real estate sector, with over twenty years of financial industry experience. | |
| Dr. Karsten von Köller Currently chairman of Lone Star Germany GmbH, deputy chairman of the Supervisory Board of Corealcredit Bank AG, deputy chairman of the Supervisory Board of MHB Bank AG, and vice chairman of the Supervisory Board of IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG. Former chief executive officer of Eurohypo AG. |
Segments
We operate in one industry segment, real estate ownership, with domestic and foreign investments.
For 2009, Carrefour France, SAS represented 13.7% of our total lease revenue.
Competition
While historically we faced active competition from many sources for investment opportunities in
commercial properties net leased to major corporations both domestically and internationally, there
was a decrease in such competition as a result of the recent deterioration in the credit and real
estate financing markets. In general, we believe that our advisors experience in real estate,
credit underwriting and transaction structuring should allow us to compete effectively for
commercial properties to the extent we make future acquisitions. However, competitors may be
willing to accept rates of return, lease terms, other transaction terms or levels of risk that we
may find unacceptable.
Environmental Matters
Our properties generally are or have been used for commercial purposes, including industrial and
manufacturing properties. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws and
regulations, current and former owners and operators of property may have liability for the cost of
investigating, cleaning up or disposing of hazardous materials released at, on, under, in or from
the property. These laws typically impose responsibility and liability without regard to whether
the owner or operator knew of or was responsible for the presence of hazardous materials or
contamination, and liability under these laws is often joint and several. Third parties may also
make claims against owners or operators of properties for personal injuries and property damage
associated with releases of hazardous materials. As part of our efforts to mitigate these risks, we
typically engage third parties to perform assessments of potential environmental risks when
evaluating a new acquisition of property, and we frequently obtain contractual protection
(indemnities, cash reserves, letters of credit or other instruments) from property sellers,
tenants, a tenants parent company or another third party to address known or potential
environmental issues.
Transactions with Affiliates
We enter into transactions with our affiliates, including the other CPA® REITs and our
advisor or its affiliates, if we believe that doing so is consistent with our investment objectives
and we comply with our investment policies and procedures. These transactions typically take the
form of jointly owned ventures, direct purchases of assets, mergers or another type of transaction.
Types of Investments
Substantially all of our investments to date are and will continue to be income-producing
properties, which are, upon acquisition, improved or being developed or which will be developed
within a reasonable period of time after their acquisition. These investments have primarily been
through sale-leaseback transactions, in which we invest in properties from companies that
simultaneously lease the properties back from us subject to long-term leases. Investments are not
restricted as to geographical areas.
Other Investments We may invest up to 10% of our net equity in unimproved or
non-income-producing real property and in equity interests. Investment in equity interests in the
aggregate will not exceed five percent of our net equity. Such equity interests are
defined generally to mean stock, warrants or other rights to purchase the stock of, or other
interests in, a tenant of a property, an entity to which we lend money or a parent or controlling
person of a borrower or tenant. We may invest in unimproved or non-income-producing property that
the advisor believes will appreciate in value or increase the value of adjoining or neighboring
properties we own. There can be no assurance that these expectations will be realized. Often,
equity interests will be restricted securities, as defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act
of 1933 (the Securities Act), which means that the securities have not been registered with the
SEC and are subject to restrictions on sale or transfer. Under this rule, we may be prohibited from
reselling the equity securities until we have fully paid for and held the securities for a period
between six months to one year. It is possible that the issuer of equity interests in which we
invest may never register the interests under the Securities Act. Whether an issuer registers its
securities under the Securities Act may depend on many factors, including the success of its
operations.
We will exercise warrants or other rights to purchase stock generally if the value of the stock at
the time the rights are exercised exceeds the exercise price. Payment of the exercise price will
not be deemed an investment subject to the above described limitations. We may borrow funds to pay
the exercise price on warrants or other rights or may pay the exercise price from funds held for
working capital and then repay the loan or replenish the working capital upon the sale of the
securities or interests purchased. We will not consider paying distributions out of the proceeds of
the sale of these interests until any funds borrowed to purchase the interest have been fully
repaid.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 9
Table of Contents
We will not invest in real estate contracts of sale unless the contracts are in recordable form and
are appropriately recorded in the applicable chain of title.
Cash resources will be invested in permitted temporary investments, which include short-term U.S.
Government securities, bank certificates of deposit and other short-term liquid investments. To
maintain our REIT qualification, we also may invest in securities that qualify as real estate
assets and produce qualifying income under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (the
Code). Any investments in other REITs in which the advisor or any director is an affiliate must
be approved as being fair and reasonable by a majority of the
directors (which must include a majority of
the independent directors) who are not otherwise interested in the transaction.
If at any time the character of our
investments would cause us to be deemed an investment company
for purposes of the Investment Company Act of 1940, we will take the necessary action to ensure
that we are not deemed to be an investment company. The advisor will continually review our
investment activity, including monitoring the proportion of our portfolio that is placed in various
investments, to attempt to ensure that we do not come within the application of the Investment
Company Act.
Our reserves, if any, will be invested in permitted temporary investments. The advisor will
evaluate the relative risks and rate of return, our cash needs and other appropriate considerations
when making short-term investments on our behalf. The rate of return of permitted temporary
investments may be less than would be obtainable from real estate investments.
(d) Financial Information About Geographic Areas
See Our Portfolio above and the Segment Information footnote of the consolidated financial
statements for financial information pertaining to our geographic operations.
(e) Available Information
All filings we make with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports
on Form 10-Q, and our current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, are
available for free on our website, http://www.cpa14.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after
they are filed or furnished to the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to be read or copied at the
SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information regarding
the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
Our filings can also be obtained for free on the SECs Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. We are
providing our website address solely for the information of investors. We do not intend our website
to be an active link or to otherwise incorporate the information contained on our website into this
report or other filings with the SEC.
We will supply to any shareholder, upon written request and without charge, a copy of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the SEC.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors. |
Our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions at the
current rate could be materially adversely affected by various risks and uncertainties, including
the conditions below. These risk factors may have affected, and in the future could affect, our
actual operating and financial results and could cause such results to differ materially from our
expectations as expressed in any forward-looking statements. You should not consider this list
exhaustive. New risk factors emerge periodically, and we cannot assure you that the factors
described below list all risks that may become material to us at any later time.
The current financial and economic crisis has adversely affected, and may continue to adversely
affect, our business.
Although we believe we are seeing an easing of the global economic and financial crisis that has
severely curbed liquidity in the credit and real estate financing markets during recent periods,
the full magnitude, effects and duration of the crisis cannot be predicted. To date, its primary
effects on our business have been increased levels of financial distress, and higher levels of
default in the payment of rent, by our tenants; bankruptcies; impairments in the value of our
property investments; challenges in refinancing existing loans as they come due; and a suspension
of our redemption plan. Depending on how long and how severe this crisis is, these trends could
continue to worsen, which may negatively affect our earnings, as well as our cash flow and,
consequently, our ability to sustain the payment of distributions at current levels and to resume
our redemption plan.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 10
Table of Contents
We are subject to the risks of real estate ownership, which could reduce the value of our
properties.
Our performance and asset value is subject, in part, to risks incident to the ownership and
operation of real estate, including:
| changes in the general economic climate; | ||
| changes in local conditions such as an oversupply of space or reduction in demand for real estate; | ||
| changes in interest rates and the availability of financing; and | ||
| changes in laws and governmental regulations, including those governing real estate usage, zoning and taxes. |
We may have difficulty selling or re-leasing our properties.
Real estate investments generally lack liquidity compared to other financial assets, and this lack
of liquidity will limit our ability to quickly change our portfolio in response to changes in
economic or other conditions. The triple-net leases we own, enter into, or acquire may be for
properties that are specially suited to the particular needs of the tenant. With these properties,
if the current lease is terminated or not renewed, we may be required to renovate the property or
to make rent concessions in order to lease the property to another tenant. In addition, if we are
forced to sell the property, we may have difficulty selling it to a party other than the tenant due
to the special purpose for which the property may have been designed. These and other limitations
may affect our ability to sell or re-lease properties without adversely affecting returns to our
shareholders. See Item 1 Business Our Portfolio for scheduled lease expirations.
We have recognized, and may in the future recognize, substantial impairment charges on our
properties.
We have incurred, and may in the future incur, substantial impairment charges, which we are
required to recognize whenever we sell a property for less than its carrying value or we determine
that the property has experienced a decline in its carrying value (or, for direct financing leases,
that the unguaranteed residential value of the underlying property has declined). By their nature,
the timing and extent of impairment charges are not predictable. Impairment charges reduce our net
income, although they do not necessarily affect our cash flow from operations.
The inability of a tenant in a single tenant property to pay rent will reduce our revenues.
Most of our properties are occupied by a single tenant and, therefore, the success of our
investments is materially dependent on the financial stability of these tenants. Revenues from
several of our tenants/guarantors constitute a significant percentage of our lease revenues. Our
five largest tenants/guarantors represented approximately 31%, 30% and 29% of total lease revenues
in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Lease payment defaults by tenants negatively impact our net
income and reduce the amounts available for distributions to shareholders. As our tenants generally
may not have a recognized credit rating, they may have a higher risk of lease defaults than if our
tenants had a recognized credit rating. In addition, the bankruptcy of a tenant could cause the
loss of lease payments as well as an increase in the costs incurred to carry the property until it
can be re-leased or sold. We have had tenants file for bankruptcy protection. In the event of a
default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial
costs in protecting the investment and re-leasing the property. If a lease is terminated, there is
no assurance that we will be able to re-lease the property for the rent previously received or sell
the property without incurring a loss.
The bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants or borrowers may cause a reduction in revenue.
Bankruptcy or insolvency of a tenant or borrower could cause:
| the loss of lease or interest payments; | ||
| an increase in the costs incurred to carry the property; | ||
| litigation; | ||
| a reduction in the value of our shares; and | ||
| a decrease in distributions to our shareholders. |
Under U.S. bankruptcy law, a tenant who is the subject of bankruptcy proceedings has the option of
assuming or rejecting any unexpired lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, any resulting claim we
have for breach of the lease (excluding collateral securing the claim) will be treated as a general
unsecured claim. The maximum claim will be capped at the amount owed for unpaid rent prior to the
bankruptcy unrelated to the termination, plus the greater of one years lease payments or 15% of
the remaining lease payments payable under the lease (but no more than three years lease
payments). In addition, due to the long-term nature of our leases and, in some cases, terms
providing for the repurchase of a property by the tenant, a bankruptcy court could recharacterize a
net lease transaction as a secured lending transaction. If that were to occur, we would not be
treated as the owner of the property, but we might have rights as a secured creditor. Those rights
would not include a right to compel the tenant to timely perform its obligations under the lease
but may instead entitle us to adequate protection, a bankruptcy concept that applies to protect
against a decrease in the value of the property if the value of the property is less than the
balance owed to us.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 11
Table of Contents
Insolvency laws outside of the U.S. may not be as favorable to reorganization or to the protection
of a debtors rights as tenants under a lease as are the laws in the U.S. Our rights to terminate a
lease for default may be more likely to be enforceable in countries other than the U.S., in which a
debtor/tenant or its insolvency representative may be less likely to have rights to force
continuation of a lease without our consent. Nonetheless, such laws may permit a tenant or an
appointed insolvency representative to terminate a lease if it so chooses.
However, in circumstances where the bankruptcy laws of the U.S. are considered to be more favorable
to debtors and to their reorganization, entities that are not ordinarily perceived as U.S.
entities may seek to take advantage of the U.S. bankruptcy laws if they are eligible. An entity
would be eligible to be a debtor under the U.S. bankruptcy laws if it had a domicile (state of
incorporation or registration), place of business or assets in the U.S. If a tenant became a debtor
under the U.S. bankruptcy laws, then it would have the option of assuming or rejecting any
unexpired lease. As a general matter, after the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings and prior to
assumption or rejection of an expired lease, U.S. bankruptcy laws provide that until an unexpired
lease is assumed or rejected, the tenant (or its trustee if one has been appointed) must timely
perform obligations of the tenant under the lease. However, under certain circumstances, the time
period for performance of such obligations may be extended by an order of the bankruptcy court.
We and the other CPA® REITs managed by the advisor have had tenants file for bankruptcy
protection and are involved in litigation (including several international tenants). Four prior
CPA® REITs reduced the rate of distributions to their investors as a result of adverse
developments involving tenants.
Similarly, if a borrower under one of our loan transactions declares bankruptcy, there may not be
sufficient funds to satisfy its payment obligations to us, which may adversely affect our revenue
and distributions to our shareholders. The mortgage loans in which we may invest and the mortgage
loans underlying the mortgage-backed securities in which we may invest may be subject to
delinquency, foreclosure and loss, which could result in losses to us.
Our distributions may exceed our adjusted cash flow from operating activities and our earnings in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP).
Over the life of our company, the regular quarterly cash distributions we pay are expected to be
principally sourced by adjusted cash flow from operating activities. Adjusted cash flow from
operating activities represents GAAP cash flow from operating activities, adjusted primarily to
reflect timing differences between the period an expense is incurred and paid, to add cash
distributions we receive from equity investments in real estate in excess of equity income and to
subtract cash distributions we pay to our noncontrolling partners in real estate ventures that we
consolidate. However, there can be no assurance that our adjusted cash flow from operating
activities will be sufficient to cover our future distributions and we may use other sources of
funds, such as proceeds from borrowings and asset sales, to fund portions of our future
distributions. In addition, our distributions in 2009 exceeded, and future distributions may
exceed, our GAAP earnings primarily because our GAAP earnings are affected by non-cash charges such
as depreciation and impairments.
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, portions of the distributions we make may represent return of
capital to our shareholders if they exceed our earnings and profits.
We do not fully control the management for our properties.
The tenants or managers of net lease properties are responsible for maintenance and other
day-to-day management of the properties. If a property is not adequately maintained in accordance
with the terms of the applicable lease, we may incur expenses for deferred maintenance expenditures
or other liabilities once the property becomes free of the lease. While our leases generally
provide for recourse against the tenant in these instances, a bankrupt or financially troubled
tenant may be more likely to defer maintenance and it may be more difficult to enforce remedies
against such a tenant. In addition, to the extent tenants are unable to conduct their operation of
the property on a financially successful basis, their ability to pay rent may be adversely
affected. Although we endeavor to monitor, on an ongoing basis, compliance by tenants with their
lease obligations and other factors that could affect the financial performance of our properties,
such monitoring may not in all circumstances ascertain or forestall deterioration either in the
condition of a property or the financial circumstances of a tenant.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 12
Table of Contents
Our leases may permit tenants to purchase a property at a predetermined price, which could limit
our realization of any appreciation or result in a loss.
In some circumstances, we grant tenants a right to repurchase the property they lease from us. The
purchase price may be a fixed price or it may be based on a formula or the market value at the time
of exercise. If a tenant exercises its right to purchase the property and the propertys market
value has increased beyond that price, we could be limited in fully realizing the appreciation on
that property. Additionally, if the price at which the tenant can purchase the property is less
than our purchase price or carrying value (for example, where the purchase price is based on an
appraised value), we may incur a loss.
Our success is dependent on the performance of the advisor.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to pay distributions
is largely dependent upon the
performance of the advisor in the acquisition of investments, the selection of tenants, the
determination of any financing arrangements, and the management of our assets. The past performance of partnerships and CPA® REITs managed
by the advisor may not be indicative of the advisors performance with respect to us. We cannot
guaranty that the advisor will be able to successfully manage and achieve liquidity for us to the
same extent that it has done so for prior programs.
The advisor may be subject to conflicts of interest.
The advisor manages our business and selects our investments. The advisor has some conflicts of
interest in its management of us, which arise primarily from the involvement of the advisor in
other activities that may conflict with us and the payment of fees by us to the advisor. Unless the
advisor elects to receive our common stock in lieu of cash compensation, we will pay the advisor
substantial cash fees for the services it provides, which will reduce the amount of cash available
for investment in properties or distribution to our shareholders. Circumstances under which a
conflict could arise between us and the advisor include:
| the receipt of compensation by the advisor for property purchases, leases, sales and financing for us, which may cause the advisor to engage in transactions that generate higher fees, rather than transactions that are more appropriate or beneficial for our business; |
| agreements between us and the advisor, including agreements regarding compensation, will not be negotiated on an arms-length basis as would occur if the agreements were with unaffiliated third parties; |
| acquisitions of single properties or portfolios of properties from affiliates, including WPC or the CPA® REITs, subject to our investment policies and procedures, which may take the form of a direct purchase of assets, a merger or another type of transaction; |
| competition with certain affiliates for property acquisitions, which may cause the advisor and its affiliates to direct properties suitable for us to other related entities; |
| a decision by the advisor (on our behalf) of whether to hold or sell a property could impact the timing and amount of fees payable to the advisor because it receives asset management fees and may decide not to sell a property; |
| disposition, incentive and termination fees, which are based on the sale price of properties or the terms of a liquidity transaction, may cause a conflict between the advisors desire to sell a property or engage in a liquidity transaction and our interests. |
We delegate our management functions to the advisor.
We delegate our management functions to the advisor, for which it
earns fees pursuant to an advisory agreement. Although at least a majority of our board of
directors must be independent, because the advisor earns fees from us and has an ownership interest in us, we have limited independence
from the advisor.
The termination or replacement of the advisor could trigger a default or repayment event under our
financing arrangements for some of our assets.
Lenders for certain of our assets typically request change of control provisions in the loan
documentation that would make the termination or replacement of WPC or its affiliates as the
advisor an event of default or an event requiring the immediate repayment of the full outstanding
balance of the loan. While we will attempt to negotiate not to include such provisions, lenders may
require such provisions. If an event of default or repayment event occurs with respect to any of
our assets, our revenues and distributions to our shareholders may be adversely affected.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 13
Table of Contents
Our estimated annual net asset value is based in part on information that the advisor provides to a
third party.
The asset management and performance compensation paid to the advisor are based principally on an
annual third party valuation of our real estate. Any valuation includes the use of estimates and
our valuation may be influenced by the information provided by the advisor. Because net asset value
is an estimate and can change as interest rate and real estate markets fluctuate, there is no
assurance that a shareholder will realize net asset value in connection with any liquidity event.
Appraisals that we obtain may include leases in place on the property being appraised, and if the
leases terminate, the value of the property may become significantly lower.
The appraisals that we obtain on our properties may be based on the value of the properties when
the properties are leased. If the leases on the properties terminate, the value of the properties
may fall significantly below the appraised value.
We are not required to meet any diversification standards; therefore, our investments may become
subject to concentration of risk.
Subject to our intention to maintain our qualification as a REIT, there are no limitations on the
number or value of particular types of investments that we may make. Although we attempt to do so,
we are not required to meet any diversification standards, including geographic diversification
standards. Therefore, our investments may become concentrated in type or geographic location, which
could subject us to significant concentration of risk with potentially adverse effects on our
investment objectives.
Our use of debt to finance investments could adversely affect our cash flow and distributions to
shareholders.
Most of our investments have been made by borrowing a portion of the purchase price of our
investments and securing the loan with a mortgage on the property. We generally borrow on a
non-recourse basis to limit our exposure on any property to the amount of equity invested in the
property. However, if we are unable to make our debt payments as required, a lender could foreclose
on the property or properties securing its debt. Additionally, lenders for our international
mortgage loan transactions typically incorporate provisions that can cause a loan default and over
which we have no control, including a loan to value ratio, a debt service coverage ratio and a
material adverse change in the borrowers or tenants business, so if real estate values decline or
a tenant defaults, the lender would have the right to foreclose on its security. If any of these
events were to occur, it could cause us to lose part or all of our investment, which in turn could
cause the value of our portfolio, and revenues available for distribution to our shareholders, to
be reduced.
A majority of our financing also requires us to make a lump-sum or balloon payment at maturity. Our
ability to make balloon payments on debt will depend upon our ability either to refinance the
obligation when due, invest additional equity in the property or sell the related property. When
the balloon payment is due, we may be unable to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable
as the original loan or sell the property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. Our
ability to accomplish these goals will be affected by various factors existing at the relevant
time, such as the state of the national and regional economies, local real estate conditions,
available mortgage rates, our equity in the mortgaged properties, our financial condition, the
operating history of the mortgaged properties and tax laws. A refinancing or sale could affect the
rate of return to shareholders and the projected time of disposition of our assets. Because of the
current conditions in the credit market, refinancing is at present very difficult. See Item 1
Business Our Portfolio Financing Strategies.
Failure to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect our operations and ability to make
distributions.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax
on our net taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from
treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year we lose our REIT qualification.
Losing our REIT qualification would reduce our net earnings available for investment or
distribution to shareholders because of the additional tax liability, and we would no longer be
required to make distributions. We might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments
in order to pay the applicable tax.
Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue
Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The
determination of various factual matters and circumstances not
entirely within our control may affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. In order to qualify as a
REIT, we must satisfy a number of requirements regarding the composition of our assets and the
sources of our gross income. Also, we must make distributions to our shareholders aggregating
annually at least 90% of our net taxable income, excluding net capital gains. Because we have
investments in foreign real property, we are subject to foreign currency gains and losses. Foreign
currency gains are qualifying income for purposes of the REIT income requirements, provided that
the underlying income satisfies the REIT income requirements. In addition, legislation, new
regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may adversely affect our investors,
our ability to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes or the desirability of an
investment in a REIT relative to other investments.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 14
Table of Contents
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may take the position that specific sale-leaseback
transactions we treat as true leases are not true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes but
are, instead, financing arrangements or loans. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so
recharacterized, we might fail to satisfy the qualification requirements applicable to REITs.
Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced U.S. federal income tax rates
because qualifying REITs do not pay U.S. federal income tax on their net income.
The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for dividends payable by domestic corporations to
individual domestic shareholders is 15% (through 2010, under current law). Dividends payable by
REITs, however, are generally not eligible for the reduced rates, except to the extent that they
are attributable to dividends paid by a taxable REIT subsidiary or a C corporation or relate to
certain other activities. This is because qualifying REITs receive an entity level tax benefit from
not having to pay U.S. federal income tax on their net income. As a result, the more favorable
rates applicable to regular corporate dividends could cause shareholders who are individuals to
perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of
non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of
REITs, including our common stock. In addition, the relative attractiveness of real estate in
general may be adversely affected by the reduced U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to
corporate dividends, which could negatively affect the value of our properties.
The ability of our board of directors to change our investment policies or revoke our REIT election
without shareholder approval may cause adverse consequences to our shareholders.
Our bylaws require that our independent directors review our investment policies at least annually
to determine that the policies we are following are in the best interest of our shareholders. These
policies may change over time. The methods of implementing our investment policies may also vary,
as new investment techniques are developed. Except as otherwise provided in our bylaws, our
investment policies, the methods for their implementation, and our other objectives, policies and
procedures may be altered by a majority of the directors (which must
include a majority of the independent
directors), without the approval of our shareholders. As a result, the nature of your investment
could change without your consent. A change in our investment strategy may, among other things,
increase our exposure to interest rate risk, default risk and commercial real property market
fluctuations, all of which could materially adversely affect our ability to achieve our investment
objectives.
In addition, our organizational documents permit our board of directors to revoke or otherwise
terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our shareholders, if the board determines that
it is not in our best interest to qualify as a REIT. In such a case, we would become subject to
U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income and we would no longer be required to distribute most
of our net income to our shareholders, which may have adverse consequences on the total return to
our shareholders.
Potential liability for environmental matters could adversely affect our financial condition.
We have invested and in the future may invest in properties historically used for industrial,
manufacturing and other commercial purposes. We therefore own and may in the future acquire
properties that have known or potential environmental contamination as a result of historical
operations. Buildings and structures on the properties we own and purchase also may have known or
suspected asbestos-containing building materials. We may invest in properties located in countries
that have adopted laws or observe environmental management standards that are less stringent than
those generally followed in the U.S., which may pose a greater risk that releases of hazardous or
toxic substances have occurred to the environment. Leasing properties to tenants that engage in
these activities, and owning properties historically and currently used for industrial,
manufacturing, and other commercial purposes, will cause us to be subject to the risk of
liabilities under environmental laws. Some of these laws could impose the following on us:
| Responsibility and liability for the cost of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances released on or from our property, generally without regard to our knowledge of, or responsibility for, the presence of these contaminants. |
| Liability for claims by third parties based on damages to natural resources or property, personal injuries, or costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances in, on, or migrating from our property. |
| Responsibility for managing asbestos-containing building materials, and third-party claims for exposure to those materials. |
Our costs of investigation, remediation or removal of hazardous or toxic substances, or for
third-party claims for damages, may be substantial. The presence of hazardous or toxic substances
at any of our properties, or the failure to properly remediate a contaminated property, could give
rise to a lien in favor of the government for costs it may incur to address the contamination or
otherwise adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the property or to borrow using the
property as collateral. While we attempt to mitigate identified environmental risks by requiring
tenants contractually to acknowledge their responsibility for complying with environmental laws and
to assume liability for environmental matters, circumstances may arise in which a tenant fails, or
is unable, to fulfill its contractual obligations. In addition, environmental liabilities, or costs
or operating limitations imposed on a tenant to comply with environmental laws, could affect its
ability to make rental payments to us.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 15
Table of Contents
International investments involve additional risks.
We have invested in properties located outside the U.S. At December 31, 2009, our directly owned
real estate properties located outside of the U.S. represented 17% of current annualized lease
revenue. These investments may be affected by factors particular to the laws of the jurisdiction in
which the property is located. These investments may expose us to risks that are different from and
in addition to those commonly found in the U.S., including:
| Changing governmental rules and policies; |
| Enactment of laws relating to the foreign ownership of property and laws relating to the ability of foreign entities to remove invested capital or profits earned from activities within the country to the U.S.; |
| Expropriation; |
| Legal systems under which the ability to enforce contractual rights and remedies may be more limited than would be the case under U.S. law; |
| The difficulty in conforming obligations in other countries and the burden of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws, which may be more stringent than U.S. laws, including tax requirements and land use, zoning and environmental laws, as well as changes in such laws; | ||
| Adverse market conditions caused by changes in national or local economic or political conditions; | ||
| Changes in relative interest rates; | ||
| Changes in the availability, cost and terms of mortgage funds resulting from varying national economic policies; | ||
| Restrictions and/or significant costs in repatriating cash and cash equivalents held in foreign bank accounts; and | ||
| Changes in real estate and other tax rates and other operating expenses in particular countries. |
In addition, the lack of publicly available information in accordance with GAAP could impair our
ability to analyze transactions and may cause us to forego an investment opportunity. It may also
impair our ability to receive timely and accurate financial information from tenants necessary to
meet our reporting obligations to financial institutions or governmental or regulatory agencies.
Certain of these risks may be greater in emerging markets and less developed countries.
Also, we may rely on third-party asset managers in international jurisdictions to monitor
compliance with legal requirements and lending agreements with respect to our properties. Failure
to comply with applicable requirements may expose us or our operating subsidiaries to additional
liabilities.
Moreover, we are subject to foreign currency risk due to potential fluctuations in exchange rates
between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar. Our primary currency exposure is to the Euro. We
attempt to mitigate a portion of the risk of currency fluctuation by financing our properties in
the local currency denominations, although there can be no assurance that this will be effective.
Because we generally place both our debt obligation to the lender and the tenants rental
obligation to us in the same currency, our results of foreign operations benefit from a weaker U.S.
dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies; that
is, a weaker U.S. dollar will tend to increase both our revenues and our expenses, while a stronger
U.S. dollar will tend to reduce both our revenues and our expenses. To the extent foreign currency
exchange rates are in line with 2008 and 2009 levels, they will have a minimal impact on our
financial conditions and results of operations. However, significant shifts in the value of the
Euro could have a material impact on our future results. For example, in the first two months of
2010, the dollar has strengthened significantly relative to the Euro.
The returns on our investments in net leased properties may not be as great as returns on equity
investments in real properties during strong real estate markets.
As an investor in single tenant, long-term net leased properties, the returns on our investments
are based primarily on the terms of the lease. Payments to us under our leases do not rise and fall
based upon the market value of the underlying properties. In addition, we generally lease each
property to one tenant on a long-term basis, which means that we cannot seek to improve current
returns at a particular property through an active, multi-tenant leasing strategy. While we will
sell assets from time to time and may recognize
gains or losses on the sales based on then-current market values, we generally intend to hold our
properties on a long-term basis. We view our leases as fixed income investments through which we
seek to achieve attractive risk-adjusted returns that will support a steady dividend. The value of
our assets will likely not appreciate to the same extent as equity investments in real estate
during periods when real estate markets are very strong. Conversely, in weak markets, the existence
of a long-term lease may positively affect the value of the property, although it is nonetheless
possible that, as a result of property declines generally, we may recognize impairment charges on
some properties.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 16
Table of Contents
A potential change in U.S. accounting standards regarding operating leases may make the leasing of
facilities less attractive to our potential domestic tenants, which could reduce overall demand for
our leasing services.
Under current authoritative accounting guidance for leases, a lease is classified by a tenant as a
capital lease if the significant risks and rewards of ownership are considered to reside with the
tenant. This situation is considered to be met if, among other things, the non-cancellable lease
term is more than 75% of the useful life of the asset or if the present value of the minimum lease
payments equals 90% or more of the leased propertys fair value. Under capital lease accounting for
a tenant, both the leased asset and liability are reflected on their balance sheet. If the lease
does not meet any of the criteria for a capital lease, the lease is considered an operating lease
by the tenant and the obligation does not appear on the tenants balance sheet; rather, the
contractual future minimum payment obligations are only disclosed in the footnotes thereto. Thus,
entering into an operating lease can appear to enhance a tenants balance sheet in comparison to
direct ownership. In response to concerns caused by a 2005 SEC study that the current model does
not have sufficient transparency, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) and the
International Accounting Standards Board conducted a joint project to re-evaluate lease accounting.
In March 2009, the FASB issued a discussion paper providing its preliminary views that the scope of
the proposed new standard should be based on the scope of the existing standards. Changes to the
accounting guidance could affect both our accounting for leases as well as that of our current and
potential customers. These changes may affect how the real estate leasing business is conducted
both domestically and internationally. For example, if the accounting standards regarding the
financial statement classification of operating leases are revised, then companies may be less
willing to enter into leases in general or desire to enter into leases with shorter terms because
the apparent benefits to their balance sheets could be reduced or eliminated. This in turn could
make it more difficult for us to enter leases on terms we find favorable.
Our net tangible book value may be adversely affected if we are required to adopt certain fair
value accounting provisions.
In June 2007, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants (AICPA) issued accounting guidance that addresses when the accounting
principles of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies must be applied by an
entity and whether investment company accounting must be retained by a parent company in
consolidation or by an investor in the application of the equity method of accounting. In addition,
this guidance includes certain disclosure requirements for parent companies and equity method
investors in investment companies that retain investment company accounting in the parent companys
consolidated financial statements or the financial statements of an equity method investor. In
February 2008, the effective date of this guidance was indefinitely delayed, and adoption of the
guidance was prohibited for any entity that had not previously adopted it. We are currently
assessing the potential impact the adoption of this statement will have on our financial position
and results of operations if we were required to adopt it.
While we maintain an exemption from the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the Investment
Company Act), and are therefore not regulated as an investment company, we may be required to
adopt the fair value accounting provisions of this guidance. Under these provisions our investments
would be recorded at fair value with changes in value reflected in our earnings, which may result
in significant fluctuations in our results of operations and net tangible book value. In addition
to the immediate substantial dilution in net tangible book value per share equal to the costs of
the offering, as described earlier, net tangible book value per share may be further reduced by any
declines in the fair value of our investments.
Your investment return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under
the Investment Company Act.
We do not intend to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. If we were
obligated to register as an investment company, we would have to comply with a variety of
substantive requirements under the Investment Company Act that impose, among other things:
| limitations on capital structure; | ||
| restrictions on specified investments; | ||
| prohibitions on transactions with affiliates; and |
| compliance with reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy disclosure and other rules and regulations that would significantly increase our operating expenses. |
In general, we expect to be able to rely on the exemption from registration provided by Section
3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act. In order to qualify for this exemption, at least 55% of
our portfolio must be comprised of real property and mortgages and other liens on an interest in
real estate (collectively, qualifying assets) and at least 80% of our portfolio must be comprised
of real estate-related assets. Qualifying assets include mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities
that represent the entire ownership in a pool of mortgage loans, and other interests in real
estate. In order to maintain our exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act, we
must continue to engage primarily in the business of buying real estate.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 17
Table of Contents
To maintain compliance with the Investment Company Act exemption, we may be unable to sell assets
we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In
addition, we may have to acquire additional income or loss generating assets that we might not
otherwise have acquired or may have to forego opportunities to acquire interests in companies that
we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our investment strategy. If we were
required to register as an investment company, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business
as currently contemplated because the Investment Company Act imposes significant limitations on
leverage. In addition, we would have to seek to restructure the advisory agreement because the
compensation that it contemplates would not comply with the Investment Company Act. Criminal and
civil actions could also be brought against us if we failed to comply with the Investment Company
Act. In addition, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court were to require enforcement,
and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.
There is not, and may never be, an active public trading market for our shares, so it will be
difficult for shareholders to sell shares quickly.
There is no active public trading market for our shares. Our articles of incorporation also
prohibit the ownership of more than 9.8% of our stock by one person or affiliated group, unless
exempted by our board of directors, which may inhibit large investors from desiring to purchase
your shares and may also discourage a takeover. Moreover, our redemption plan has been suspended.
Even if our redemption plan is reactivated, it will continue to include numerous restrictions that
limit your ability to sell your shares to us, and our board of directors will continue to have the
authority to further amend, suspend or terminate the plan. Therefore, it will be difficult for you
to sell your shares promptly or at all. In addition, the price received for any shares sold prior
to a liquidity event is likely to be less than the proportionate value of the real estate we own.
Investor suitability standards imposed by certain states may also make it more difficult to sell
your shares to someone in those states.
Maryland law could restrict change in control.
Provisions of Maryland law applicable to us prohibit business combinations with:
| any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of outstanding shares, referred to as an interested shareholder; |
| an affiliate who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding shares, also referred to as an interested shareholder; or |
| an affiliate of an interested shareholder. |
These prohibitions last for five years after the most recent date on which the interested
shareholder became an interested shareholder. Thereafter, any business combination must be
recommended by our board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the
votes entitled to be cast by holders of our outstanding shares and two-thirds of the votes entitled
to be cast by holders of our shares other than shares held by the interested shareholder or by an
affiliate or associate of the interested shareholder. These requirements could have the effect of
inhibiting a change in control even if a change in control was in our shareholders interest. These
provisions of Maryland law do not apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or
exempted by our board of directors prior to the time that someone becomes an interested
shareholder. In addition, a person is not an interested shareholder if the board of directors
approved in advance the transaction by which he or she otherwise would have become an interested
shareholder. However, in approving a transaction, the board of directors may provide that its
approval is subject to compliance at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions
determined by the board.
Our articles of incorporation restrict beneficial ownership of more than 9.8% of the outstanding
shares by one person or affiliated group in order to assist us in meeting the REIT qualification
rules. These requirements could have the effect of inhibiting a change in control even if a change
in control were in our shareholders interest.
Shareholders equity may be diluted
Our shareholders do not have preemptive rights to any shares of common stock issued by us in the
future. Therefore, if we (1) sell shares of common stock in the future, including those issued
pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, (2) sell securities that are convertible into our
common stock, (3) issue common stock in a private placement to institutional investors, or (4)
issue shares of
common stock to our directors or to WPC and its affiliates for payment of fees in lieu of cash,
then shareholders will experience dilution of their percentage ownership in us. Depending on the
terms of such transactions, most notably the offer price per share and the value of our properties
and our other investments, existing shareholders might also experience a dilution in the book value
per share of their investment in us.
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments. |
None.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 18
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Properties. |
Our principal corporate offices are located at 50 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10020. The
advisor also has its primary international investment offices in
London and Amsterdam. The advisor also has office
space domestically in Dallas, Texas and San Francisco, California and
internationally in Shanghai.
See Item 1, Business Our Portfolio for a discussion of the properties we hold for rental
operations and Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplemental Data Schedule III Real
Estate and Accumulated Depreciation for a detailed listing of such properties.
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings. |
Various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business are pending against us. The
results of these proceedings are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
Item 4. | Removed and Reserved. |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 19
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. |
Unlisted Shares and Distributions
There is
no active public trading market for our shares. At March 18, 2010, there were 28,317
holders of record of our shares.
We are required to distribute annually at least 90% of our distributable REIT net taxable income to
maintain our status as a REIT. Quarterly distributions declared by us for the past two years are as
follows:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
First quarter |
$ | 0.1976 | $ | 0.1954 | ||||
Second quarter |
0.1981 | 0.1959 | ||||||
Third quarter |
0.1986 | 0.1964 | ||||||
Fourth quarter |
0.1991 | 0.1971 | ||||||
$ | 0.7934 | $ | 0.7848 | |||||
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
For the three months ended December 31, 2009, we issued 168,023 restricted shares of common stock
to the advisor as consideration for performance fees. These shares were issued at $13.00 per share,
which was our most recently published estimated net asset value per share as approved by our board
of directors at the date of issuance. Since none of these transactions were considered to have
involved a public offering within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, the shares
issued were deemed to be exempt from registration. In acquiring our shares, the advisor represented
that such interests were being acquired by it for the purposes of investment and not with a view to
the distribution thereof.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Total number of | Maximum number (or | |||||||||||||||
shares | approximate dollar value) | |||||||||||||||
purchased as part of | of shares that may yet be | |||||||||||||||
Total number of | Average price | publicly announced | purchased under the | |||||||||||||
2009 Period | shares purchased(a) | paid per share | plans or programs(a) | plans or programs(a) | ||||||||||||
October |
N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
November |
N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
December |
39,391 | $ | 12.28 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
Total |
39,391 | |||||||||||||||
(a) | Represents shares of our common stock purchased pursuant to our redemption plan. The amount of shares purchasable in any period depends on the availability of funds generated by our dividend reinvestment and share purchase plan and other factors at the discretion of our board of directors. In September 2009, our board of directors approved the suspension of our redemption plan, effective for all redemption requests received subsequent to September 1, 2009, subject to limited exceptions in cases of death or qualifying disability. During the first quarter of 2010, our board of directors re-evaluated the status of our redemption plan and determined to keep the suspension in place. The suspension continues as of the date of this Report and will remain in effect until our board of directors, in its discretion, determines to reinstate the redemption plan. We cannot give any assurances as to the timing of any further actions by the board with regard to the plan. The redemption plan will terminate if and when our shares are listed on a national securities market. |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 20
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data. |
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes in Item 8.
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating Data (a) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues (b) |
$ | 169,985 | $ | 163,475 | $ | 160,546 | $ | 130,134 | $ | 127,138 | ||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(2,891 | ) | 44,209 | 55,979 | 58,224 | 46,477 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (c) |
7,001 | 47,201 | 65,954 | 71,574 | 49,402 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests |
(1,685 | ) | (2,037 | ) | (1,564 | ) | (1,956 | ) | (2,153 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to CPA®:14 shareholders |
5,316 | 45,164 | 64,390 | 69,618 | 47,249 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to
CPA®:14 shareholders |
(0.05 | ) | 0.48 | 0.62 | 0.83 | 0.68 | ||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to CPA®:14 shareholders |
0.06 | 0.51 | 0.73 | 0.99 | 0.69 | |||||||||||||||
Cash distributions declared per share |
0.7934 | 0.7848 | 0.7766 | 0.7711 | 0.7646 | |||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,551,969 | $ | 1,637,430 | $ | 1,715,148 | $ | 1,675,323 | $ | 1,295,036 | ||||||||||
Net investments in real estate (d) |
1,310,471 | 1,368,111 | 1,433,314 | 1,491,815 | 1,202,567 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term obligations (e) |
812,543 | 821,262 | 861,902 | 826,459 | 679,522 | |||||||||||||||
Other Information |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow from operating activities |
$ | 87,900 | $ | 110,697 | $ | 89,730 | $ | 102,232 | $ | 70,895 | ||||||||||
Cash distributions paid |
68,832 | 68,851 | 68,323 | 83,633 | 51,905 | |||||||||||||||
Payment of mortgage principal (f) |
44,873 | 17,383 | 16,552 | 12,580 | 12,433 |
(a) | Certain prior year balances have been retrospectively adjusted as discontinued operations and for the adoption of recent accounting guidance for noncontrolling interests. | |
(b) | Total revenues during 2009, 2008 and 2007 include lease revenue from properties acquired in the Merger in December 2006. | |
(c) | Results for 2009 and 2008 reflected impairment charges totaling $41.0 million and $10.9 million, respectively. | |
(d) | Net investments in real estate consists of net investments in properties, net investment in direct financing leases, equity investments in real estate, real estate under construction and assets held for sale, as applicable. | |
(e) | Represents mortgage and note obligations and deferred acquisition fee installments. | |
(f) | Represents scheduled mortgage principal payments. |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 21
Table of Contents
Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (MD&A) is
intended to provide the reader with information that will assist in understanding our financial
statements and the reasons for changes in certain key components of our financial statements from
period to period. MD&A also provides the reader with our perspective on our financial position and
liquidity, as well as certain other factors that may affect our future results.
Business Overview
As described in more detail in Item 1 of this Report, we are a publicly owned, non-actively traded
REIT that invests in commercial properties leased to companies domestically and internationally. As
a REIT, we are not subject to U.S. federal income taxation as long as we satisfy certain
requirements, principally relating to the nature of our income, the level of our distributions and
other factors. We earn revenue principally by leasing the properties we own to single corporate
tenants, primarily on a triple-net lease basis, which requires the tenant to pay substantially all
of the costs associated with operating and maintaining the property. Revenue is subject to
fluctuation because of the timing of new lease transactions, lease terminations, lease expirations,
contractual rent increases, tenant defaults and sales of properties. We were formed in 1997 and
are managed by the advisor.
Financial Highlights
(In thousands)
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 169,985 | $ | 163,475 | $ | 160,546 | ||||||
Net income attributable to
CPA®:14 shareholders |
5,316 | 45,164 | 64,390 | |||||||||
Cash flow from operating activities |
87,900 | 110,697 | 89,730 |
Total revenues increased in 2009 as compared to 2008 primarily due to scheduled rent increases at
several properties and income recognized in connection with the forgiveness of a loan.
The reduction in net income in 2009 as compared to 2008 was primarily due to an increase in the
amount of impairment charges recognized. We recognized impairment charges totaling $41.0 million in
2009 as compared to $10.9 million in 2008. In addition, 2008 net income included income of $10.9
million in payments from the advisor related to its previously disclosed SEC investigation (the
SEC Settlement).
Cash flow from operating activities in 2009 was impacted negatively by increases in rent
delinquencies and property carrying costs. Cash flow from operating activities in 2008 included
the receipt of $10.9 million related to the advisors SEC Settlement.
Our quarterly cash distribution increased to $0.1991 per share for the fourth quarter of 2009, or
$0.80 per share on an annualized basis.
We consider the performance metrics listed above as well as certain non-GAAP performance metrics to
be important measures in the evaluation of our results of operations, liquidity and capital
resources. We evaluate our results of operations with a primary focus on the ability to generate
cash flow necessary to meet our objectives of funding distributions to shareholders and increasing
equity in our real estate.
Current Trends
As of the date of this Report, we are focused on managing our existing portfolio of properties. In
our initial offering documents, we stated our intention to consider liquidity events for investors
generally commencing eight years following the investment of substantially all of the net proceeds
from that offering, which occurred in 2000. As a result, during the first quarter of 2008, the
advisor began actively considering liquidity alternatives on our behalf and discussed with our
board of directors a number of alternatives, including a possible merger with another
CPA® REIT, selling our assets, either on a portfolio basis or individually, or listing
our shares on a stock exchange. However, in light of deteriorating market conditions during 2008,
the advisor recommended, and our board agreed, that further consideration of liquidity alternatives
be postponed until market conditions become more stable. Although we believe we have recently seen
an easing of the global economic and financial crisis that had severely curbed liquidity in the
credit and real estate financing markets, the full magnitude, effects
and duration of the crisis cannot be predicted, and we are unable to predict
when a liquidity event will occur.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 22
Table of Contents
As a result of improving economic conditions, we have seen an improvement in financing conditions
for refinancing of maturing debt, both domestically and internationally, although generally at
lower loan to value ratios than in prior periods. However, the continuing effects of the
challenging economic environment have also resulted in some negative trends affecting our business.
These trends include: continued tenant defaults; renewals of tenant leases generally at lower
rental rates than existing leases; low inflation rates, which will likely limit rent increases in
upcoming periods because most of our leases provide for rent adjustments indexed to changes in the
CPI; and higher impairment charges. In addition, partly to preserve capital and liquidity, we
suspended our redemption plan in September 2009.
Despite recent indicators that the economy is beginning to recover, the current trends that affect
our business remain dependent on the rate and scope of the recovery, rendering any discussion of
the impact of these trends highly uncertain. Nevertheless, as of the date of this Report, the
impact of current financial and economic trends on our business segments, and our response to those
trends, is presented below.
Financing Conditions
Conditions in the real estate financing markets impact our ability to refinance maturing debt.
Despite the recent weak financing environment, which has resulted in lenders for both domestic and
international investments offering loans at shorter maturities, with lower loan to value ratios,
and subject to variable interest rates, we have begun to see some improvements in the financing
markets and to date have been successful refinancing maturing debt. We generally attempt to obtain
interest rate caps or swaps to mitigate the impact of variable rate financing. During 2009, we
refinanced $31.6 million of maturing debt with new non-recourse mortgage financing totaling $27.8
million, with a weighted average annual interest rate and term of up to 6.7% and 9.8 years,
respectively. In addition, a venture in which we have a 67% interest, which we account for under
the equity method of accounting, refinanced maturing debt with new non-recourse mortgage financing
of $22.6 million with a fixed annual interest rate and term of 5.9% and 10 years, respectively.
At
December 31, 2009, we had aggregate balloon payments totaling
$66.7 million due in 2010, and $255.8 million due in 2011, inclusive
of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests totaling $29.3 million in 2011. In the first quarter of 2010, we made balloon payments totaling $5.4 million. In addition,
our share of balloon payments due in 2010 and 2011 on our unconsolidated ventures is $4.2 million
and $9.8 million, respectively. We are actively seeking to refinance this debt but believe we and
our venture partners have sufficient financing alternatives and/or cash resources to make these
payments, if necessary. Our property level debt is generally non-recourse, which means that if we
default on a mortgage loan obligation, our exposure is limited to our equity invested in that
property.
Corporate Defaults
Some of our tenants have experienced financial stress, and we expect that this trend may continue,
albeit at a less severe rate, in 2010. Corporate defaults can reduce our results of operations and
cash flow from operations.
Tenants in financial distress may become delinquent on their rent and/or default on their leases
and, if they file for bankruptcy protection, may reject our lease in bankruptcy court, all of which
may require us to incur impairment charges. Even where a default has not occurred and a tenant is
continuing to make the required lease payments, we may restructure or renew leases on less
favorable terms, or the tenants credit profile may deteriorate, which could affect the value of
the leased asset and could in turn require us to incur impairment charges. Based on tenant activity
during 2009, including lease amendments, early lease renewals and lease rejections in bankruptcy
court, we currently expect that 2010 lease revenue will decrease by approximately 9%, as compared
with 2009 lease revenue. However, this amount may increase or decrease based on additional tenant
activity and changes in economic conditions, both of which are outside of our control. If the North
American and European economic zones continue to experience the improving economic conditions that
they have experienced recently, we would expect to see an improvement in the general business
conditions for our tenants, which should result in less stress for them financially. However, if
economic conditions deteriorate, it is possible that our tenants financial condition will
deteriorate as well.
During 2009, five tenants that accounted for $9.9 million of our 2009 lease revenues vacated their
properties or rejected their leases with us in connection with bankruptcy or liquidation
proceedings. During the time that these properties remain unoccupied, we anticipate that we will
incur significant carrying costs. As a result of these corporate defaults, during 2009 we suspended
debt service on three related non-recourse mortgage loans, which had an aggregate outstanding
balance of $54.1 million at December 31, 2009. In addition, we entered into lease amendments with
three tenants upon their emergence from bankruptcy during 2009.
To mitigate these risks, we have invested in assets that we believe are critically important to a
tenants operations and have attempted to diversify our portfolio by tenant and tenant industry. We
also monitor tenant performance through review of rent delinquencies as a precursor to a potential
default, meetings with tenant management and review of tenants financial statements and compliance
with
any financial covenants. When necessary, our asset management process includes restructuring
transactions to meet the evolving needs of tenants, re-leasing properties, refinancing debt and
selling properties, where possible, as well as protecting our rights when tenants default or enter
into bankruptcy.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 23
Table of Contents
Net Asset Values
We generally calculate an estimated net asset value per share for our portfolio on an annual basis.
This calculation is based in part on an estimate of the fair market value of our real estate
provided by a third party, adjusted to give effect to the estimated fair value of mortgages
encumbering our assets (also provided by a third party) as well as other adjustments. There are a
number of variables that comprise this calculation, including individual tenant credits, tenant
defaults, lease terms, lending credit spreads, and foreign currency exchange rates, among others.
We do not control these variables and, as such, cannot predict how they will change in the future.
As a result of the overall continued weakness in the economy during 2009, our estimated net asset
value per share as of December 31, 2009 decreased to $11.80, a 9.2% decline from our December 31,
2008 estimated net asset value per share of $13.00. We generally would not expect to update our
estimated net asset value on an interim basis unless we were to undertake an extraordinary
corporate transaction. However, there can be no assurance that, if we were to calculate our
estimated net asset value on an interim basis, it would not be less than $11.80 per share,
particularly given current market volatility.
Redemptions and Distributions
We experienced higher levels of share redemptions during 2009. Our redemption plan provides for
certain limits on the amount of redemptions, including that redemptions cannot exceed 5% of
outstanding shares. As a result of the increased redemption level, redemptions were approaching the
5% level, and as a result, in September 2009, our board of directors approved the suspension of our
redemption plan effective for all redemption requests received subsequent to September 1, 2009.
This suspension will remain in effect until our board of directors, in its discretion, determines
to reinstate the redemption plan. To date, we have not experienced conditions that have affected
our ability to continue to pay distributions.
Inflation and Foreign Exchange Rates
Our leases generally have rent adjustments based on formulas indexed to changes in the CPI or other
similar indices for the jurisdiction in which the property is located. Because these rent
adjustments may be calculated based on changes in the CPI over a multi-year period, changes in
inflation rates can have a delayed impact on our results of operations. Rent adjustments during
2008 and 2009 have generally benefited from increases in inflation rates during the years prior to
the scheduled rent adjustment date. However, we expect that rent increases will be significantly
lower in coming years as a result of the current historically low inflation rates in the U.S. and
the Euro zone.
We have foreign investments and as a result are subject to risk from the effects of exchange rate
movements. Because we generally place both our debt obligation to the lender and the tenants
rental obligation to us in the same currency, our results of foreign operations benefit from a
weaker U.S. dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to foreign
currencies; that is, a weaker U.S. dollar will tend to increase both our revenues and our expenses,
while a stronger U.S. dollar will tend to reduce both our revenues and our expenses.
The average rate for the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro strengthened by approximately 5%
during 2009 in comparison to 2008, resulting in a modestly negative impact on our results of
operations for Euro-denominated investments in the current year. For 2008 as compared with 2007,
the average rate for the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro weakened by approximately 7%,
resulting in a modestly positive impact on our results of operations for Euro-denominated
investments in 2008 as compared with 2007. Investments denominated in the Euro accounted for
approximately 17%, 15% and 16% of our annualized lease revenues for 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. To the extent foreign currency exchange rates are in line with 2008 and 2009 levels,
they will have a minimal impact on our financial conditions and results of operations. However,
significant shifts in the value of the Euro could have a material impact on our future results. For
example, in the first two months of 2010, the dollar has strengthened
significantly relative to the Euro.
How We Evaluate Results of Operations
We evaluate our results of operations with a primary focus on our ability to generate cash flow
necessary to meet our objectives of funding distributions to shareholders and increasing our equity
in our real estate. As a result, our assessment of operating results gives less emphasis to the
effect of unrealized gains and losses, which may cause fluctuations in net income for comparable
periods but have no impact on cash flows, and to other non-cash charges, such as depreciation and
impairment charges.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 24
Table of Contents
We consider cash flows from operating activities, cash flows from investing activities, cash flows
from financing activities and certain non-GAAP performance metrics to be important measures in the
evaluation of our results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. Cash flows from operating
activities are sourced primarily from long-term lease contracts. These leases are generally triple
net and mitigate, to an extent, our exposure to certain property operating expenses. Our evaluation
of the amount and expected fluctuation of cash flows from operating activities is essential in
assessing our ability to fund operating expenses, service debt and fund distributions to
shareholders.
We consider cash flows from operating activities plus cash distributions from equity investments in
real estate in excess of equity income, less cash distributions paid
to consolidated joint venture
partners, as a supplemental measure of liquidity in evaluating our ability to sustain distributions
to shareholders. We consider this measure useful as a supplemental measure to the extent the source
of distributions in excess of equity income in real estate is the result of non-cash charges, such
as depreciation and amortization, because it allows us to evaluate the cash flows from consolidated
and unconsolidated investments in a comparable manner. In deriving this measure, we exclude cash
distributions from equity investments in real estate that are sourced from the sales of the equity
investees assets or refinancing of debt because we deem them to be returns of investment and not
returns on investment.
We focus on measures of cash flows from investing activities and cash flows from financing
activities in our evaluation of our capital resources. Investing activities typically consist of
the acquisition or disposition of investments in real property and the funding of capital
expenditures with respect to real properties. Financing activities primarily consist of the payment
of distributions to shareholders, obtaining non-recourse mortgage financing, generally in
connection with the acquisition or refinancing of properties, and making mortgage principal
payments. Our financing strategy has been to purchase substantially all of our properties with a
combination of equity and non-recourse mortgage debt. A lender on a non-recourse mortgage loan
generally has recourse only to the property collateralizing such debt and not to any of our other
assets. This strategy has allowed us to diversify our portfolio of properties and, thereby, limit
our risk. However, because of recent conditions in credit markets, obtaining financing is more
challenging at present and we may complete transactions without obtaining financing. In the event
that a balloon payment comes due, we may seek to refinance the loan, restructure the debt with
existing lenders, or evaluate our ability to pay the balloon payment from our cash reserves or sell
the property and use the proceeds to satisfy the mortgage debt.
Results of Operations
Our evaluation of the sources of lease revenues is as follows (in thousands):
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 147,184 | $ | 142,549 | $ | 138,638 | ||||||
Interest income from direct
financing leases |
14,356 | 15,359 | 16,472 | |||||||||
$ | 161,540 | $ | 157,908 | $ | 155,110 | |||||||
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 25
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the net lease revenues (i.e., rental income and interest income
from direct financing leases) that we earned from lease obligations through our direct ownership of
real estate (in thousands):
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
Lessee | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Carrefour France, SAS (a) (b) |
$ | 22,177 | $ | 19,656 | $ | 17,379 | ||||||
Petsmart, Inc. (c) |
8,303 | 8,215 | 8,303 | |||||||||
Federal Express Corporation (c) |
7,044 | 6,967 | 6,891 | |||||||||
Dicks Sporting Goods, Inc. |
6,939 | 7,076 | 6,832 | |||||||||
Atrium Companies, Inc. |
5,277 | 5,170 | 5,017 | |||||||||
Metaldyne Company LLC (d) |
5,210 | 3,899 | 3,797 | |||||||||
Tower Automotive, Inc. (b) |
4,629 | 4,493 | 4,194 | |||||||||
Perkin Elmer, Inc. (a) (e) |
4,552 | 4,802 | 3,838 | |||||||||
Katun Corporation (a) |
4,501 | 4,497 | 4,400 | |||||||||
Caremark Rx, Inc. |
4,300 | 4,300 | 4,300 | |||||||||
McLane Company Food Service Inc. |
3,736 | 3,706 | 3,569 | |||||||||
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (f) |
3,635 | | | |||||||||
Amerix Corp. (b) |
3,241 | 2,980 | 2,928 | |||||||||
Rave Reviews Cinemas LLC |
3,037 | 2,907 | 2,888 | |||||||||
Gibson Guitar Corp. (c) |
2,727 | 2,658 | 2,556 | |||||||||
Builders FirstSource, Inc. (c) |
2,719 | 2,692 | 2,633 | |||||||||
Gerber Scientific, Inc. |
2,668 | 2,591 | 2,508 | |||||||||
Collins & Aikman Corporation (g) |
2,564 | 2,488 | 3,644 | |||||||||
Waddington North America, Inc. |
2,536 | 2,536 | 2,468 | |||||||||
Other (a) (c) |
61,745 | 66,275 | 66,965 | |||||||||
$ | 161,540 | $ | 157,908 | $ | 155,110 | |||||||
(a) | Amounts are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The average rate for the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro during the year ended December 31, 2009 strengthened by approximately 5% in comparison to 2008, resulting in a negative impact on lease revenues for our Euro-denominated investments in 2009. This impact was mitigated in some cases by CPI or similar rent increases. | |
(b) | Increase was due to CPI-based (or equivalent) rent increase. | |
(c) | These revenues are generated in consolidated ventures, generally with our affiliates, and include lease revenues applicable to noncontrolling interests totaling $9.8 million, $7.2 million and $6.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. | |
(d) | Increase is due to amortization of a lease termination payment. In December 2009, we entered into a lease settlement with Metaldyne upon its emergence from bankruptcy whereby Metaldyne terminated its lease for four of the five properties it leases from us. Metaldyne will continue to lease the fifth property at a reduced rent. We entered into direct leases with existing subtenants at two of the properties vacated by Metaldyne, while the other two properties remain vacant at the date of this Report. During 2009, we recognized an impairment charge of $4.0 million on a property leased to Metaldyne (Note 11). | |
(e) | We acquired an additional property leased to this tenant in December 2007. | |
(f) | We consolidated this venture as of September 30, 2009 (Note 6). | |
(g) | Decrease in 2008 was due to the sale of two properties in December 2007. |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 26
Table of Contents
We recognize income from equity investments in real estate, of which lease revenues are a
significant component. The following table sets forth the net lease revenues earned by these
ventures. Amounts provided are the total amounts attributable to the ventures and do not represent
our proportionate share (dollars in thousands):
Ownership | ||||||||||||||||
Interest at | Years ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
Lessee | December 31, 2009 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Hellweg Die Profi-Baumarkte GmbH & Co. KG (a) |
32 | % | $ | 35,889 | $ | 37,128 | $ | 25,536 | ||||||||
U-Haul Moving Partners, Inc. and Mercury Partners, L.P. (b) |
12 | % | 30,589 | 28,541 | 28,541 | |||||||||||
True Value Company |
50 | % | 14,492 | 14,698 | 14,169 | |||||||||||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. |
67 | % | 11,175 | 11,175 | 10,451 | |||||||||||
Life Time Fitness, Inc. |
56 | % | 9,272 | 9,272 | 9,216 | |||||||||||
CheckFree Holdings, Inc. |
50 | % | 4,964 | 4,830 | 4,711 | |||||||||||
Best Buy Co., Inc. |
37 | % | 4,553 | 4,421 | 4,484 | |||||||||||
Compucom Systems, Inc. |
67 | % | 5,020 | 4,902 | 4,549 | |||||||||||
Del Monte Corporation (b) |
50 | % | 3,529 | 3,241 | 2,955 | |||||||||||
The Upper Deck Company |
50 | % | 3,194 | 3,194 | 3,194 | |||||||||||
Dicks Sporting Goods, Inc. |
45 | % | 3,141 | 3,141 | 3,030 | |||||||||||
ShopRite Supermarkets, Inc. |
45 | % | 2,484 | 2,461 | 2,442 | |||||||||||
Town Sports International Holdings, Inc. |
56 | % | 1,086 | 1,086 | 1,086 | |||||||||||
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (c) |
50 | % | | 3,343 | 3,343 | |||||||||||
$ | 129,388 | $ | 131,433 | $ | 117,707 | |||||||||||
(a) | We acquired our interest in this venture during 2007. In addition to lease revenues, the venture also earned interest income of $27.1 million, $28.1 million and $19.5 million on a note receivable during 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Amounts are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. | |
(b) | Increase was due to CPI-based (or equivalent) rent increase. | |
(c) | We consolidated this venture as of September 30, 2009 (Note 6). |
Lease Revenues
Our net leases generally have rent adjustments based on formulas indexed to changes in the CPI or
other similar indices for the jurisdiction in which the property is located, sales overrides or
other periodic increases, which are intended to increase lease revenues in the future. We own
international investments and, therefore, lease revenues from these investments are subject to
fluctuations in exchange rate movements in foreign currencies. In certain cases, although we
recognize lease revenues in connection with our tenants obligation to pay rent, we may also
increase our uncollected rent expense if tenants are experiencing financial distress and have not
paid the rent to us that they owe, as described in Property expenses below.
2009 vs. 2008 For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, lease revenues increased
by $3.6 million, primarily due to scheduled rent increases at several properties totaling $4.7
million. In addition, an adjustment we made in the third quarter of 2009 to record a venture under
the consolidation method that was previously accounted for under the equity method (Note 6)
resulted in $2.5 million increase in lease revenues. These increases were partially offset by a
decrease in lease revenues of $3.1 million as a result of tenants lease restructurings and lease
rejections in bankruptcy court, as well as a decrease of $0.4 million as a result of the negative
impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
2008 vs. 2007 For the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007, lease revenues increased
by $2.8 million, primarily due to scheduled rent increases at several properties and rental income
from an investment that we entered into in December 2007 totaling $3.9 million. Lease revenues
also increased by $1.5 million due to the positive impact of fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates. These increases were partially offset by the impact of property sales and lease
terminations during 2008, which reduced lease revenues by $2.5 million.
Other Operating Income
Other operating income generally consists of costs reimbursable by tenants, lease termination
payments and other non-rent related revenues including, but not limited to, settlements of claims
against former lessees. We receive settlements in the ordinary course of
business; however, the timing and amount of such settlements cannot always be estimated.
Reimbursable tenant costs are recorded as both income and property expense and, therefore, have no
impact on net income.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 27
Table of Contents
2009 vs. 2008 For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, other operating income
increased by $2.9 million, primarily due to income recognized in connection with the forgiveness of
a loan to us by one of our tenants. Upon emerging from bankruptcy in the third quarter of 2009,
Special Devices terminated its existing lease with us and entered into two new leases, one of which
expired in January 2010 while the other one expires in June 2021. In connection with their
restructuring, Special Devices forgave our existing $4.6 million note payable to it effective
January 2010. As a result of the loan forgiveness, we recognized income of $2.9 million in 2009.
The remaining income will be recognized between 2010 and 2021, when the second lease expires.
2008 vs. 2007 For the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007, other operating income
increased by $0.1 million.
Depreciation and Amortization
2009 vs. 2008 For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, depreciation and
amortization increased by $4.1 million, primarily due to an increase of $2.9 million in the
amortization of lease-related intangible assets in connection with the restructuring of several
leases in 2009 and $2.2 million from a venture that was previously accounted for under the equity
method (Note 6). These increases were partially offset by a decrease in depreciation of $0.7
million related to a property that became fully depreciated in 2008.
2008 vs. 2007 For the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007, depreciation and
amortization expense decreased by $0.6 million, primarily due to a $1.3 million write off of
lease-related intangible assets in 2007 related to a tenant that terminated its lease with us.
This decrease was partially offset by a full year of depreciation incurred on several properties
acquired in 2007 totaling $0.6 million.
Property Expense
2009 vs. 2008 For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, property expenses
increased by $8.7 million, primarily due to increases in costs related to current and former
tenants who have filed for bankruptcy totaling $10.8 million, partially offset by a $2.2 million
decrease in asset management and performance fees payable to the advisor. The tenant related costs
in 2009 were comprised of increases of $8.6 million in uncollected rent expense and $2.2 million in
professional fees. Included in uncollected rent expense for 2009 is a charge of $3.9 million to
write off estimated unrecoverable straight-line rent receivables, primarily for Nortel Networks
Inc., which filed for bankruptcy in January 2009 and disaffirmed its lease with us. In March 2010,
we turned the property back to the lender in exchange for the lenders agreement to relieve us of
all obligations under the related non-recourse mortgage loan. The decrease in asset management and
performance fees was a result of a decline in our annual estimated net asset valuation at December
31, 2008 in comparison with the estimated valuation at December 31, 2007.
2008 vs. 2007 For the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007, property expenses
increased by $2.6 million, primarily due to a higher number of tenants experiencing financial
difficulties, which resulted in a $1.6 million increase in uncollected rent expense and
unreimbursable costs at these properties. In addition, reimbursable tenant costs increased by $0.6
million in 2008.
General and Administrative
2009 vs. 2008 For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, general and
administrative expenses decreased by $1.5 million, primarily due to $1.4 million of costs incurred
in connection with exploring potential liquidity alternatives during 2008.
2008 vs. 2007 For the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007, general and
administrative expenses increased by $0.3 million, primarily due to the $1.4 million of costs
incurred in connection with exploring potential liquidity alternatives during 2008, partially
offset by a $0.9 million decrease in our share of expenses allocated by the advisor. These
expenses are allocated among us and the affiliated CPA® REITs according to a formula
based on gross revenues. The amounts allocated to us during 2008 decreased in comparison to prior
years as a result of the growth in gross revenues of certain of our affiliates.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 28
Table of Contents
Impairment Charges
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recorded impairment charges in our
continuing real estate operations totaling $40.3 million, $1.1 million and $0.3 million,
respectively. The table below summarizes these impairment charges (in thousands):
Lessee | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | Reason | ||||||||||
Nortel Networks Inc. |
$ | 22,152 | $ | | $ | | Tenant filed for bankruptcy | |||||||
Buffets, Inc. |
8,100 | | | Tenant filed for bankruptcy | ||||||||||
Metaldyne Company |
4,027 | | | Tenant filed for bankruptcy | ||||||||||
Nexpak Corporation |
3,500 | | | Tenant filed for bankruptcy | ||||||||||
Various lessees |
2,566 | 1,139 | 345 | Decline in unguaranteed residual value or estimated fair market value of properties | ||||||||||
Impairment charges from continuing operations |
$ | 40,345 | $ | 1,139 | $ | 345 | ||||||||
See Income from Equity Investments in Real Estate below for additional impairment charges
incurred during 2009 and 2008.
Income from Equity Investments in Real Estate
Income from equity investments in real estate represents our proportionate share of net income
(revenue less expenses) from investments entered into with affiliates or third parties in which we
have a noncontrolling interest but exercise significant influence.
2009 vs. 2008 For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, income from equity
investments in real estate increased by $13.2 million, primarily due to a decrease in
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $9.1 million and a reduction in interest expense of $2.1
million as a result of several ventures refinancing their mortgage loans during 2008 and 2009.
Under current accounting guidance for investments in unconsolidated ventures, we are required to
periodically compare an investments carrying value to its estimated fair value and recognize an
impairment charge to the extent that carrying value exceeds fair value. At December 31, 2009, we
incurred an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $0.7 million on an equity investment to
reduce the carrying value of the investment to its estimated fair value. At December 31, 2008, we
incurred impairment charges totaling $9.8 million on three domestic equity investments as a result
of their carrying values exceeding their estimated fair values, for which we deemed the decline in
value to be other-than-temporary.
2008 vs. 2007 For the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007, income from equity
investments in real estate decreased by $16.5 million, primarily due to the recognition of
other-than-temporary impairment charges totaling $9.8 million in 2008, as described above. In
addition, income from equity investments in real estate decreased by $5.4 million as a result of
the sale of certain investments in the fourth quarter of 2007. During 2008, we also recognized a
net loss of $0.4 million from a German venture that we acquired in April 2007, as compared to a net
gain of $1.4 million in 2007. Substantially all of the loss from the German venture resulted from
the recognition of an unrealized loss on embedded credit derivative instruments.
Other Income and (Expenses)
Other income and (expenses) generally consists of gains and losses on foreign currency transactions
and derivative instruments. We and certain of our foreign consolidated subsidiaries have
intercompany debt and/or advances that are not denominated in the entitys functional currency.
When the intercompany debt or accrued interest thereon is remeasured against the functional
currency of the entity, a gain or loss may result. For intercompany transactions that are of a
long-term investment nature, the gain or loss is recognized as a cumulative translation adjustment
in other comprehensive income or loss. We also recognize gains or losses on foreign currency
transactions when we repatriate cash from our foreign investments. In addition, we have certain
derivative instruments, including common stock warrants, for which realized and unrealized gains
and losses are included in earnings. The timing and amount of such gains and losses cannot always
be estimated and are subject to fluctuation.
2009 vs. 2008 For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, net other income
decreased by $2.4 million, primarily due to a decrease in realized gains on foreign currency
transactions of $3.3 million as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the
Euro in 2009 as compared to 2008, as well as a reduction in the total amount of cash repatriated
from foreign subsidiaries. This decrease was partially offset by unrealized gains totaling $1.3
million on certain marketable securities in 2009.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 29
Table of Contents
2008 vs. 2007 For the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007, net other income
decreased by $7.1 million, primarily due to a reduction in gains on the exchange or sale of real
estate, net, of $9.0 million, which was partially offset by an increase in net gains on foreign
currency transactions of $1.8 million. During 2007, we recognized a gain on exchange of real estate
of $8.4 million in connection with the exchange of redeveloped land for a condominium interest in a
newly constructed retail facility. Construction of the retail facility was funded entirely by the
developer and was completed in November 2007, at which time we completed the exchange and
recognized a gain on the exchange of $8.4 million. In addition, during 2007, we also recognized a
gain of $1.1 million on the sale of two properties to Collins & Aikman Corporation, which
repurchased two properties it leased from us upon its emergence from bankruptcy protection. The
increase in net gains on foreign currency transactions was primarily due to the continued weakening
of the U.S. dollar relative to the Euro during 2008 as compared to 2007.
Advisor Settlement
During
2008, we recognized income of $10.9 million in connection with
the advisors SEC Settlement (Note 14). We received payment of this amount from the advisor in April 2008.
Provision for Income Taxes
2009 vs. 2008 For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, provisions for income taxes
were $3.3 million, $2.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The increase in 2009 of $1.1
million compared to 2008 was primarily due to an increase in foreign tax liabilities as a result of
higher taxable income recognized by certain foreign subsidiaries.
Discontinued Operations
2009 During 2009, we recognized income from discontinued operations of $9.9 million. During
2009, we sold two domestic properties and recognized a net gain of $8.6 million. In addition,
income generated from the operations of discontinued properties was $1.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
2008 During 2008, we recognized income from discontinued operations of $3.0 million, which
consisted of income generated from the operations of discontinued properties of $2.5 million and a
net gain on sale of properties of $0.5 million.
2007 During 2007, we recognized income from discounted operations of $10.0 million, due to the
recognition of a net gain of $7.8 million on the sale of a property in Arizona, as well as income
generated from the operations of discounted properties of $2.2 million.
Net Income Attributable to CPA®:14 Shareholders
2009 vs. 2008 For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, the resulting net income
attributable to CPA®:14 shareholders decreased by $39.8 million.
2008 vs. 2007 For the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007, the resulting net income
attributable to CPA®:14 shareholders decreased by $19.2 million.
Financial Condition
Sources and Uses of Cash during the Year
One of our objectives is to use the cash flow from net leases to meet operating expenses, service
debt and fund distributions to shareholders. Our cash flows fluctuate period to period due to a
number of factors, which may include, among other things, the timing of purchases and sales of real
estate, timing of proceeds from non-recourse mortgage loans and receipt of lease revenues, the
advisors annual election to receive fees in restricted shares of our common stock or cash, the
timing and characterization of distributions from equity investments in real estate and payment to
the advisor of the annual installment of deferred acquisition fees and interest thereon in the
first quarter. Despite this fluctuation, we believe that we will generate sufficient cash from
operations and from equity distributions in excess of equity income in real estate to meet our
short-term and long-term liquidity needs. We may also use existing cash resources, the proceeds of
non-recourse mortgage loans and the issuance of additional equity securities to meet these needs.
We assess our ability to access capital on an ongoing basis. Our sources and uses of cash during
the year are described below.
Operating Activities During 2009, we used cash flows from operating activities of $87.9 million
to fund distributions to shareholders of $68.8 million. We also made scheduled mortgage principal
installments of $44.9 million and paid distributions of $2.5 million to affiliates who hold
noncontrolling interests in various entities with us. Cash distributions received from our equity investments in real estate in
excess of cumulative equity income (see Investing Activities below) and our existing cash resources
were also used to fund scheduled mortgage principal payments and distributions to holders of
noncontrolling interests.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 30
Table of Contents
In 2009, our cash flows from operating activities were negatively affected by increased rent
delinquencies and property carrying costs related to tenants operating under bankruptcy protection.
In addition, for 2009, the advisor elected to receive 20% of its performance fee from us in cash
with the remaining 80% in our restricted stock, while in 2008 the advisor had elected to receive
all of its performance fees from us in our restricted stock. This change by the advisor had a
negative impact on our cash flow of approximately $2.9 million in 2009. During 2008, our cash flows
from operating activities benefited from the receipt of $10.9 million from the advisor in
connection with the SEC Settlement.
Investing Activities Our investing activities are generally comprised of real estate related
transactions (purchases and sales), payment of our annual installment of deferred acquisition fees
to the advisor and capitalized property related costs. During 2009, we received aggregate proceeds
of $26.2 million from the sale of two domestic properties. We used $15.0 million of the sales
proceeds from one of these properties, which had been encumbered by a $12.2 million non-recourse
mortgage loan, to defease non-recourse mortgage debt on two unrelated domestic properties. We then
substituted the then-unencumbered properties as collateral for the pre-existing $12.2 million loan.
We also received distributions from our equity investments in real estate in excess of cumulative
equity income of $12.3 million, including $2.2 million of cash that was repatriated from a German
investment and $1.9 million representing our share of net proceeds from a ventures mortgage
refinancing. In addition, we contributed $5.3 million to an equity investment to partially paydown
its existing mortgage balance in connection with the ventures restructuring of its non-recourse
mortgage debt. Capital expenditures, which totaled $2.9 million, primarily consisted of $2.5
million to acquire an expansion constructed by a tenant at an existing property. In January 2009,
we paid our annual installment of deferred acquisition fees to the advisor, which totaled $3.6
million.
Financing Activities In addition to making scheduled mortgage principal payments and paying
distributions to shareholders and to affiliates that hold noncontrolling interests in various
entities with us, we used $49.3 million to defease or prepay several non-recourse mortgage
obligations. We defeased debt totaling $15.0 million on two properties (see Investing Activities
above); refinanced mortgage loans totaling $31.6 million, which had scheduled maturity dates during
2009, for new non-recourse mortgage financing of $27.8 million; and used $2.7 million to defease a
mortgage loan in connection with the sale of a property. We also received $8.8 million as a result
of issuing shares through our distribution reinvestment and stock purchase plan and used $38.6
million to repurchase our shares through a redemption plan that allows shareholders to sell shares
back to us, subject to certain limitations as described below. We incurred deferred financing costs
on financing obtained during 2009 totaling $1.0 million.
We
maintain a quarterly redemption plan pursuant to which we may, at the discretion of our board
of directors, redeem shares of our common stock from shareholders seeking liquidity. We limit the
number of shares we may redeem so that the shares we redeem in any quarter, together with the
aggregate number of shares redeemed in the preceding three fiscal quarters, does not exceed a
maximum of 5% of our total shares outstanding as of the last day of the immediately preceding
quarter. In addition, our ability to effect redemptions is subject to our having available cash to
do so. Due to higher levels of redemption requests as compared to prior years, as of the third
quarter of 2009 redemptions totaled approximately 5% of total shares outstanding. In light of this
5% limitation and our desire to preserve capital and liquidity, in September 2009 our board of
directors approved the suspension of our redemption plan, effective for all redemption requests
received subsequent to September 1, 2009, which was the deadline for all redemptions taking place
in the third quarter of 2009. We may make limited exceptions to the suspension of the program in
cases of death or qualifying disability. During the first quarter of
2010, our board of directors re-evaluated the status of our
redemption plan and determined to keep the suspension in place. The
suspension continues as of the date of this Report and will remain in
effect until our board of directors, in its discretion, determines to
reinstate the redemption plan. We cannot give any assurances as to
the timing of any further actions by the board with respect to the
plan.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, we redeemed
3,153,150 shares of our common stock pursuant to
our redemption plan at an average price per share of $12.10. All of the redemption requests made
prior to the suspension of our redemption plan were granted. For redemption requests made after the
suspension of the redemption plan, only those which qualified under the exceptions to the
suspension of our redemption plan as described above were granted. Of the total 2009
redemptions, we redeemed 39,391 shares in the fourth quarter of 2009, all of which were redeemed
under the exceptions to the suspension. We funded share redemptions during 2009 from the proceeds
of the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment and share
purchase plan and from existing cash resources.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 31
Table of Contents
Summary of Financing
The table below summarizes our non-recourse long-term debt (dollars in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Balance |
||||||||
Fixed rate |
$ | 684,284 | $ | 691,263 | ||||
Variable rate (a) |
121,379 | 119,531 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 805,663 | $ | 810,794 | ||||
Percent of total debt |
||||||||
Fixed rate |
85 | % | 85 | % | ||||
Variable rate (a) |
15 | % | 15 | % | ||||
100 | % | 100 | % | |||||
Weighted average interest rate at end of year |
||||||||
Fixed rate |
7.2 | % | 7.4 | % | ||||
Variable rate (a) |
6.2 | % | 6.2 | % |
(a) | Variable rate debt at December 31, 2009 included (i) $18.4 million that has been effectively converted to fixed rate debt through interest rate swap derivative instruments and (ii) $97.7 million in mortgage obligations that bore interest at fixed rates but that convert to variable rates during their term. The interest rate for one of these loans, which had an outstanding balance of $8.0 million at December 31, 2009, is scheduled to reset to a variable rate in April 2010. |
Cash Resources
At December 31, 2009, our cash resources consisted of cash and cash equivalents totaling $93.3
million. Of this amount, $6.1 million, at then current exchange rates, was held in foreign bank
accounts, and we could be subject to restrictions or significant costs should we decide to
repatriate these amounts. We also had unleveraged properties that had an aggregate carrying value
of $57.3 million although, given the current economic environment, there can be no assurance that
we would be able to obtain financing for these properties. Our cash resources can be used for
working capital needs and other commitments.
At the
date of this Report, we had several properties that were vacant following the former tenants
termination of their leases with us in bankruptcy court. During the time that these properties
remain unoccupied, we anticipate that we will incur significant carrying costs. If additional
tenants encounter financial difficulties as a result of the current economic environment, our cash
flows could be further impacted.
Cash Requirements
During 2010, we expect that cash payments will include paying distributions to shareholders and to
our affiliates who hold noncontrolling interests in entities we control and making scheduled
mortgage principal payments, as well as other normal recurring operating expenses. Balloon payments
on our consolidated investments totaling $66.7 million will be
due during 2010, consisting of $17.5 million during the first quarter
of 2010, $12.2 million during the second quarter of 2010, $11.7 million
in the third quarter of 2010 and $25.3 million during the fourth quarter of 2010. During the first quarter of 2010, we made balloon payments totaling $5.4 million on maturing mortgage loans. We are
actively seeking to refinance certain of these loans and believe we have existing cash resources
that can be used to make these payments.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 32
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
The table below summarizes our off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations at
December 31, 2009 and the effect that these arrangements and obligations are expected to have on
our liquidity and cash flow in the specified future periods (in thousands):
Less than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | 5 Years | ||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse debt Principal |
$ | 805,663 | $ | 86,262 | $ | 434,601 | $ | 37,277 | $ | 247,523 | ||||||||||
Deferred acquisition fees Principal |
6,880 | 2,645 | 2,557 | 893 | 785 | |||||||||||||||
Interest on borrowings and deferred acquisition fees (a) |
195,447 | 54,325 | 63,405 | 33,669 | 44,048 | |||||||||||||||
Subordinated disposition fees (b) |
5,722 | | 5,722 | | | |||||||||||||||
Operating and other lease commitments (c) |
4,462 | 641 | 1,305 | 1,310 | 1,206 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 1,018,174 | $ | 143,873 | $ | 507,590 | $ | 73,149 | $ | 293,562 | |||||||||||
(a) | Interest on unhedged variable rate debt obligations was calculated using the applicable annual variable interest rates and balances outstanding at December 31, 2009. | |
(b) | Payable to the advisor, subject to meeting contingencies, in connection with any liquidity event. There can be no assurance that any liquidity event will be achieved in this time frame. See Holding Period in Item 1 above. | |
(c) | Operating and other lease commitments consist primarily of rent obligations under ground leases and our share of future minimum rents payable under an office cost-sharing agreement with certain affiliates for the purpose of leasing office space used for the administration of real estate entities. Amounts under the cost-sharing agreement are allocated among the entities based on gross revenues and are adjusted quarterly. The table above excludes the rental obligations under ground leases of two ventures in which we own a combined interest of 32%. These obligations total approximately $34.6 million over the lease terms, which extend through 2091. We account for these ventures under the equity method of accounting. |
Amounts in the table above related to our foreign operations are based on the exchange rate of the
local currencies at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2009, we had no material capital lease
obligations for which we are the lessee, either individually or in the aggregate.
We acquired two related investments in 2007 that are accounted for under the equity method of
accounting as we do not have a controlling interest but exercise significant influence. The
remaining ownership of these entities is held by our advisor and certain of our affiliates. The
primary purpose of these investments was to ultimately acquire an interest in the underlying
properties and as such was structured to effectively transfer the economics of ownership to us and
our affiliates while still monetizing the sales value by transferring the legal ownership in the
underlying properties over time. We acquired an interest in a venture (the property venture) that
in turn acquired a 24.7% ownership interest in a limited partnership owning 37 properties
throughout Germany. Concurrently, we also acquired an interest in a second venture (the lending
venture) that made a loan (the note receivable) to the holder of the remaining 75.3% interests
in the limited partnership (the partner). Under the terms of the note receivable, the lending
venture will receive interest that approximates 75% of all income earned by the limited
partnership, less adjustments. Our total effective ownership interest in the ventures is 32%. In
connection with the acquisition, the property venture agreed to an option agreement that gives the
property venture the right to purchase, from the partner, an additional 75% interest in the limited
partnership no later than December 2010 at a price equal to the principal amount of the note
receivable at the time of purchase. Upon exercise of this purchase option, the property venture
would own 99.7% of the limited partnership. The property venture has also agreed to a second
assignable option agreement to acquire the remaining 0.3% interest in the limited partnership by
December 2012. If the property venture does not exercise its option agreements, the partner has
option agreements to put its remaining interests in the limited partnership to the property venture
during 2014 at a price equal to the principal amount of the note receivable at the time of
purchase.
Upon exercise of the purchase option or the put, in order to avoid circular transfers of cash, the
seller and the lending venture and the property venture agreed that the lending venture or the
seller may elect, upon exercise of the respective purchase option or put option, to have the loan
from the lending venture to the seller repaid by a deemed transfer of cash. The deemed transfer
shall be in amounts necessary to fully satisfy the sellers obligations to the lending venture, and
the lending venture shall be deemed to have transferred such funds up to us and our affiliates as
if we had recontributed them down into the property venture based on our pro rata ownership.
Accordingly, at December 31, 2009 (based on the exchange rate of the Euro), the only additional
cash required by us to fund the exercise of the purchase option or the put would be the pro rata
amounts necessary to redeem the advisors interest, the aggregate of
which would be $2.4 million, with our share approximating $0.8 million. In addition, our maximum
exposure to loss on these ventures was $16.2 million (inclusive of both our existing investment and
the amount to fund our future commitment).
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 33
Table of Contents
We have investments in unconsolidated ventures that own single-tenant properties net leased to
corporations. All of the underlying investments are owned with our affiliates. Summarized financial
information for these ventures and our ownership interest in the ventures at December 31, 2009 are
presented below. Summarized financial information provided represents the total amounts
attributable to the ventures and does not represent our proportionate share (dollars in thousands):
Ownership | ||||||||||||||||
Interest at | Total Third | |||||||||||||||
Lessee | December 31, 2009 | Total Assets | Party Debt | Maturity Date | ||||||||||||
ShopRite Supermarkets, Inc. |
45 | % | $ | 16,342 | $ | 9,483 | 7/2010 | |||||||||
The Upper Deck Company |
50 | % | 27,693 | 10,403 | 2/2011 | |||||||||||
Del Monte Corporation |
50 | % | 14,505 | 10,389 | 8/2011 | |||||||||||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (a) |
67 | % | 88,182 | 33,502 | 1/2012 | |||||||||||
Best Buy Co., Inc. |
37 | % | 42,562 | 24,594 | 2/2012 | |||||||||||
True Value Company |
50 | % | 131,196 | 69,165 | 1/2013&2/2013 | |||||||||||
U-Haul Moving Partners, Inc. and Mercury Partners, LP |
12 | % | 294,101 | 164,328 | 5/2014 | |||||||||||
Checkfree Holdings, Inc. |
50 | % | 33,745 | 29,500 | 6/2016 | |||||||||||
Life Time Fitness, Inc. and Town Sports
International Holdings, Inc. |
56 | % | 114,443 | 83,249 | 12/2016&5/2017 | |||||||||||
Hellweg Die Profi-Baumarkte GmbH & Co. KG (b) |
32 | % | 470,451 | 404,267 | 4/2017 | |||||||||||
Compucom Systems, Inc. (c) |
67 | % | 32,738 | 21,748 | 3/2019 | |||||||||||
Dicks Sporting Goods, Inc. |
45 | % | 27,756 | 22,185 | 1/2022 | |||||||||||
$ | 1,293,714 | $ | 882,813 | |||||||||||||
(a) | In July 2009, this venture restructured its existing non-recourse mortgage debt and made an $8.0 million partial paydown of the loan balance. | |
(b) | Ownership interest represents our combined interest in two ventures. Total assets excludes a note receivable from an unaffiliated third party. Total third party debt excludes a related noncontrolling interest that is redeemable by the unaffiliated third party. The note receivable and noncontrolling interest each had a carrying value of $337.4 million at December 31, 2009. Dollar amounts shown are based on the exchange rate of the Euro at December 31, 2009. | |
(c) | In April 2009, this venture refinanced its existing non-recourse mortgage debt for new non-recourse financing of $22.6 million. |
In connection with the purchase of many our properties, we required the sellers to perform
environmental reviews. We believe, based on the results of these reviews, that our properties were
in substantial compliance with federal and state environmental statutes at the time the properties
were acquired. However, portions of certain properties have been subject to some degree of
contamination, principally in connection with either leakage from underground storage tanks,
surface spills or other on-site activities. In most instances
where contamination has been identified, tenants are actively engaged in the remediation process
and addressing identified conditions. Tenants are generally subject to environmental statutes and
regulations regarding the discharge of hazardous materials and any related remediation obligations.
In addition, our leases generally require tenants to indemnify us from all liabilities and losses
related to the leased properties, with provisions of this indemnification specifically addressing
environmental matters. The leases generally include provisions that allow for periodic
environmental assessments, paid for by the tenant, and allow us to extend leases until such time as
a tenant has satisfied its environmental obligations. Certain of our leases allow us to require
financial assurances from tenants, such as performance bonds or letters of credit, if the costs of
remediating environmental conditions are, in our estimation, in excess of specified amounts.
Accordingly, we believe that the ultimate resolution of any environmental matters should not have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements. Many of these accounting policies require judgment and the use of estimates and
assumptions when applying these policies in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate these estimates and judgments based on historical
experience as well as other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These
estimates are subject to change in the future if underlying assumptions or factors change. Certain
accounting policies, while significant, may not require the use of estimates. Those accounting
policies that require significant estimation and/or judgment are listed below.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 34
Table of Contents
Classification of Real Estate Assets
We classify our directly owned leased assets for financial reporting purposes at the inception of a
lease, or when significant lease terms are amended, as either real estate leased under operating
leases or net investment in direct financing leases. This classification is based on several
criteria, including, but not limited to, estimates of the remaining economic life of the leased
assets and the calculation of the present value of future minimum rents. We estimate remaining
economic life based in part on third party appraisals of the leased assets. We calculate the present value of
future minimum rents using the leases implicit interest rate, which requires an estimate of the
residual value of the leased assets as of the end of the non-cancelable lease term. Estimates of
residual values are generally based on third party appraisals. Different estimates of residual
value result in different implicit interest rates and could possibly affect the financial reporting
classification of leased assets. The contractual terms of our leases are not necessarily different
for operating and direct financing leases; however, the classification is based on accounting
pronouncements that are intended to indicate whether the risks and rewards of ownership are
retained by the lessor or substantially transferred to the lessee. We believe that we retain
certain risks of ownership regardless of accounting classification. Assets classified as net
investment in direct financing leases are not depreciated but are written down to expected residual
value over the lease term. Therefore, the classification of assets may have a significant impact on
net income even though it has no effect on cash flows.
Identification of Tangible and Intangible Assets in Connection with Real Estate Acquisitions
In connection with our acquisition of properties accounted for as operating leases, we allocate
purchase costs to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their estimated
fair values. We determine the value of tangible assets, consisting of land and buildings, as if
vacant, and record intangible assets, including the above- and below-market value of leases, the
value of in-place leases and the value of tenant relationships, at their relative estimated fair
values.
We determine the value attributed to tangible assets in part using a discounted cash flow model
that is intended to approximate both what a third party would pay to purchase the vacant property
and rent at current estimated market rates. In applying the model, we assume that the disinterested
party would sell the property at the end of an estimated market lease term. Assumptions used in the
model are property-specific where this information is available; however, when certain necessary
information is not available, we use available regional and property-type information. Assumptions
and estimates include a discount rate or internal rate of return, marketing period necessary to put
a lease in place, carrying costs during the marketing period, leasing commissions and tenant
improvements allowances, market rents and growth factors of these rents, market lease term and a
cap rate to be applied to an estimate of market rent at the end of the market lease term.
We acquire properties subject to net leases and determine the value of above-market and
below-market lease intangibles based on the difference between (i) the contractual rents to be paid
pursuant to the leases negotiated and in place at the time of acquisition of the properties and
(ii) our estimate of fair market lease rates for the property or a similar property, both of which
are measured over a period equal to the estimated market lease term. We discount the difference
between the estimated market rent and contractual rent to a present value using an interest rate
reflecting our current assessment of the risk associated with the lease acquired, which includes a
consideration of the credit of the lessee. Estimates of market rent are generally based on a third
party appraisal obtained in connection with the property acquisition and can include estimates of
market rent increase factors, which are generally provided in the appraisal or by local brokers.
We evaluate the specific characteristics of each tenants lease and any pre-existing relationship
with each tenant in determining the value of in-place lease and tenant relationship intangibles. To
determine the value of in-place lease intangibles, we consider estimated market rent, estimated
carrying costs of the property during a hypothetical expected lease-up period, current market
conditions and costs to execute similar leases. Estimated carrying costs include real estate taxes,
insurance, other property operating costs and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the
hypothetical expected lease-up periods, based on assessments of specific market conditions. In
determining the value of tenant relationship intangibles, we consider the expectation of lease
renewals, the nature and
extent of our existing relationship with the tenant, prospects for developing new business with the
tenant and the tenants credit profile. We also consider estimated costs to execute a new lease,
including estimated leasing commissions and legal costs, as well as estimated carrying costs of the
property during a hypothetical expected lease-up period. We determine these values using third
party appraisals or our estimates.
Basis of Consolidation
When we obtain an economic interest in an entity, we evaluate the entity to determine if it is
deemed a variable interest entity (VIE) and, if so, whether we are deemed to be the primary
beneficiary and are therefore required to consolidate the entity. Significant judgment is required
to determine whether a VIE should be consolidated. We review the contractual arrangements provided
for in the partnership agreement or other related contracts to determine whether the entity is
considered a VIE under current authoritative accounting guidance, and to establish whether we have
any variable interests in the VIE. We then compare our variable interests, if any, to those of the
other venture partners to identify the party that is exposed to the majority of the VIEs expected
losses, expected residual returns, or both. We use this analysis to determine who should
consolidate the VIE. The comparison uses both qualitative and quantitative analytical techniques
that may involve the use of a number of assumptions about the amount and timing of future cash
flows.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 35
Table of Contents
For an entity that is not considered to be a VIE, the general partners in a limited partnership (or
similar entity) are presumed to control the entity regardless of the level of their ownership and,
accordingly, may be required to consolidate the entity. We evaluate the partnership agreements or
other relevant contracts to determine whether there are provisions in the agreements that would
overcome this presumption. If the agreements provide the limited partners with either (a) the
substantive ability to dissolve or liquidate the limited partnership or otherwise remove the
general partners without cause or (b) substantive participating rights, the limited partners
rights overcome the presumption of control by a general partner of the limited partnership, and,
therefore, the general partner must account for its investment in the limited partnership using the
equity method of accounting.
When we obtain an economic interest in an entity that is structured at the date of acquisition as a
tenant-in-common interest, we evaluate the tenancy-in-common agreements or other relevant documents
to ensure that the entity does not qualify as a VIE and does not meet the control requirement
required for consolidation. We also use judgment in determining whether the shared decision-making
involved in a tenant-in-common interest investment creates an opportunity for us to have
significant influence on the operating and financial decisions of these investments and thereby
creates some responsibility by us for a return on our investment. We account for tenancy-in-common
interests under the equity method of accounting.
Impairments
We periodically assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our long-lived assets may
be impaired or that their carrying value may not be recoverable. These impairment indicators
include, but are not limited to, the vacancy of a property that is not subject to a lease; a lease
default by a tenant that is experiencing financial difficulty; the termination of a lease by a
tenant or the rejection of a lease in a bankruptcy proceeding. Impairment charges do not
necessarily reflect the true economic loss caused by the default of the tenant, which may be
greater or less than the impairment amount. In addition, we use
non-recourse debt to finance our acquisitions, and to the extent that the value of an asset is written down to below the value of its debt, there is
an unrealized gain that will be triggered when we turn the asset back to the lender in satisfaction
of the debt. We may incur impairment charges on long-lived assets, including real estate, direct
financing leases, assets held for sale and equity investments in real estate. We may also incur
impairment charges on marketable securities. Estimates and judgments used when evaluating whether
these assets are impaired are presented below.
Real Estate
For real estate assets in which an impairment indicator is identified, we follow a two-step process
to determine whether an asset is impaired and to determine the amount of the charge. First, we
compare the carrying value of the property to the future net undiscounted cash flow that we expect
the property will generate, including any estimated proceeds from the eventual sale of the
property. The undiscounted cash flow analysis requires us to make our best estimate of market
rents, residual values and holding periods. We estimate market rents and residual values using
market information from outside sources such as broker quotes or recent comparable sales. In cases
where the available market information is not deemed appropriate, we perform a future net cash flow
analysis discounted for inherent risk associated with each asset to determine an estimated fair
value. As our investment objective is to hold properties on a long-term basis, holding periods used
in the undiscounted cash flow analysis generally range from five to ten years. Depending on the
assumptions made and estimates used, the future cash flow projected in the evaluation of long-lived
assets can vary within a range of outcomes. We consider the likelihood of possible outcomes in
determining the best possible estimate of
future cash flows. If the future net undiscounted cash flow of the property is less than the
carrying value, the property is considered to be impaired. We then measure the loss as the excess
of the carrying value of the property over its estimated fair value. The propertys estimated fair
value is primarily determined using market information from outside sources such as broker quotes
or recent comparable sales.
Direct Financing Leases
We review our direct financing leases at least annually to determine whether there has been an
other-than-temporary decline in the current estimate of residual value of the property. The
residual value is our estimate of what we could realize upon the sale of the property at the end of
the lease term, based on market information from outside sources such as broker quotes or recent
comparable sales. If this review indicates that a decline in residual value has occurred that is
other-than-temporary, we recognize an impairment charge and revise the accounting for the direct
financing lease to reflect a portion of the future cash flow from the lessee as a return of
principal rather than as revenue. While we evaluate direct financing leases if there are any
indicators that the residual value may be impaired, the evaluation of a direct financing lease can
be affected by changes in long-term market conditions even though the obligations of the lessee are
being met.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 36
Table of Contents
Assets Held for Sale
We classify assets that are accounted for as operating leases as held for sale when we have entered
into a contract to sell the property, all material due diligence requirements have been satisfied
and we believe it is probable that the disposition will occur within one year. When we classify an
asset as held for sale, we calculate its estimated fair value as the expected sale price, less
expected selling costs. We base the expected sale price on the contract and the expected selling
costs on information provided by brokers and legal counsel. We then compare the assets estimated
fair value to its carrying value, and if the estimated fair value is less than the propertys
carrying value, we reduce the carrying value to the estimated fair value. We will continue to
review the property for subsequent changes in the estimated fair value, and may recognize an
additional impairment charge if warranted.
If circumstances arise that we previously considered unlikely and, as a result, we decide not to
sell a property previously classified as held for sale, we reclassify the property as held and
used. We record a property that is reclassified as held and used at the lower of (a)
its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any
depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified
as held and used, or (b) the estimated fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to
sell.
Equity Investments in Real Estate
We evaluate our equity investments in real estate on a periodic basis to determine if there are any
indicators that the value of our equity investment may be impaired and to establish whether or not
that impairment is other-than-temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, we measure the
charge as the excess of the carrying value of our investment over its estimated fair value, which
is determined by multiplying the estimated fair value of the underlying ventures net assets by our
ownership interest percentage. For our unconsolidated ventures in real estate, we calculate the
estimated fair value of the underlying ventures real estate or net investment in direct financing
lease as described in Real Estate and Direct Financing Leases above. The fair value of the
underlying ventures debt, if any, is calculated based on market interest rates and other market
information. The fair value of the underlying ventures other assets and liabilities is generally
assumed to be equal to their carrying value.
Marketable Securities
We evaluate our marketable securities for impairment if a decline in estimated fair value below
cost basis is significant and/or has lasted for an extended period of time. We review the
underlying cause of the decline in value and the estimated recovery period, as well as the severity
and duration of the decline, to determine if the decline is other-than-temporary. In our
evaluation, we consider our ability and intent to hold these investments for a reasonable period of
time sufficient for us to recover our cost basis. We also evaluate the near-term prospects for each
of these investments in relation to the severity and duration of the decline. If we determine that
the decline is other-than-temporary, we record an impairment charge to reduce our cost basis to the
estimated fair value of the security.
Provision for Uncollected Amounts from Lessees
On an ongoing basis, we assess our ability to collect rent and other tenant-based receivables and
determine an appropriate allowance for uncollected amounts. Because we have a limited number of
lessees (19 lessees represented 62% of lease revenues during 2009),
we believe that it is necessary to evaluate the collectibility of these receivables based on the
facts and circumstances of each situation rather than solely using statistical methods. Therefore,
in recognizing our provision for uncollected rents and other tenant receivables, we evaluate actual
past due amounts and make subjective judgments as to the collectability of those amounts based on
factors including, but not limited to, our knowledge of a lessees circumstances, the age of the
receivables, the tenants credit profile and prior experience with the tenant. Even if a lessee has
been making payments, we may reserve for the entire receivable amount from the lessee if we believe
there has been significant or continuing deterioration in the lessees ability to meet its lease
obligations.
Income Taxes
We have elected to be treated as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code. In order to
maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required to, among other things, distribute at least
90% of our REIT net taxable income to our shareholders (excluding net capital gains) and meet
certain tests regarding the nature of our income and assets. As a REIT, we are not subject to U.S.
federal income tax with respect to the portion of our income that meets certain criteria and is
distributed annually to shareholders. Accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal income taxes is
included in the consolidated financial statements with respect to these operations. We believe we
have operated, and we intend to continue to operate, in a manner that allows us to continue to meet
the requirements for taxation as a REIT. Many of these requirements, however, are highly technical
and complex. If we were to fail to meet these requirements, we would be subject to U.S. federal
income tax.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 37
Table of Contents
We conduct business in various states and municipalities within the U.S. and the European Union
and, as a result, we or one or more of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction and various state and certain foreign jurisdictions. As a result, we are subject to
certain state, local and foreign taxes and a provision for such taxes is included in the
consolidated financial statements.
Significant judgment is required in determining our tax provision and in evaluating our tax
positions. We establish tax reserves in accordance using a benefit recognition model, which we
believe could result in a greater amount of benefit (and a lower amount of reserve) being initially
recognized in certain circumstances. Provided that the tax position is deemed more likely than not
of being sustained, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent
likely of being ultimately realized upon settlement. The tax position must be derecognized when it
is no longer more likely than not of being sustained.
Future Accounting Requirements
In June 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance related to the consolidation of VIEs. These
amendments require an enterprise to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary
beneficiary of a VIE based on whether the entity (1) has the power to direct matters that most
significantly impact the activities of the VIE, and (2) has the obligation to absorb losses or the
right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The
amendments change the consideration of kick-out rights in determining if an entity is a VIE, which
may cause certain additional entities to now be considered VIEs. Additionally, they require an
ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary and provide a framework for the events that
trigger a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. This guidance is effective for us beginning
January 1, 2010. We are currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of the new
guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Market Risks
Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency
exchange rates and equity prices. The primary risks to which we are exposed are interest rate risk
and foreign currency exchange risk. We are also exposed to market risk as a result of
concentrations in certain tenant industries, including automotive related industries (see Current
Trends).
We do not generally use derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency exchange risk
exposure and do not use derivative instruments to hedge credit/market risks or for speculative
purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
The value of our real estate and related fixed rate debt obligations are subject to fluctuations
based on changes in interest rates. The value of our real estate is also subject to fluctuations
based on local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of lessees, all
of which may affect our ability to refinance property-level mortgage debt when balloon payments are
scheduled. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and
tax policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions, and other factors
beyond our control. An increase in interest rates would likely cause the value of our owned assets
to decrease. Increases in interest rates may also have an impact on the credit profile of certain
tenants.
Although we have not experienced any credit losses on investments in loan participations, in the
event of a significant rising interest rate environment and given the current economic crisis, loan
defaults could occur and result in our recognition of credit losses, which could adversely affect
our liquidity and operating results. Further, such defaults could have an adverse effect on the
spreads between interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.
We hold a participation in Carey Commercial Mortgage Trust (CCMT), a mortgage pool consisting of
$172.3 million of mortgage debt collateralized by properties and lease assignments on properties
owned by us and two affiliates. With our affiliates, we also purchased subordinated interests
totaling $24.1 million, in which we own a 25% interest, and we acquired an additional 30% interest
in the subordinated interests from CPA®:12 in connection with the Merger. The
subordinated interests are payable only after all other classes of ownership receive their stated
interest and related principal payments. The subordinated interests, therefore, could be affected
by any defaults or nonpayment by lessees. At December 31, 2009, there have been no defaults. We
account for the CCMT as a marketable security that we expect to hold on a long-term basis. The
value of the CCMT is subject to fluctuation based on changes in interest rates, economic conditions
and the creditworthiness of lessees at the mortgaged properties. At December 31, 2009, we estimate
that our total interest in CCMT had a fair value of $12.2 million, an increase of $0.8 million from
the fair value at December 31, 2008.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 38
Table of Contents
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowing activities.
To limit this exposure, we attempt to obtain mortgage financing on a long-term, fixed-rate basis.
However, from time to time, we or our venture partners may obtain variable rate non-recourse
mortgage loans and, as a result, may enter into interest rate swap agreements or interest rate cap
agreements with lenders that effectively convert the variable rate debt service obligations of the
loan to a fixed rate. Interest rate swaps are agreements in which a series of interest rate flows
are exchanged over a specific period, and interest rate caps limit the borrowing rate of variable
rate debt obligations while allowing participants to share in downward shifts in interest rates.
These interest rate swaps and caps are derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the
forecasted interest payments on the debt obligation. The notional, or face, amount on which the
swaps or caps are based is not exchanged. Our objective in using such derivatives is to limit our
exposure to interest rate movements. At December 31, 2009, we estimate that the fair value of our
interest rate swaps, which are included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
in the consolidated financial statements, was in a net liability position of $1.0 million (Note 10).
In connection with a German transaction in 2007, two ventures in which we have a total effective
ownership interest of 32% obtained participation rights in two interest rate swaps obtained by the
lender of the non-recourse mortgage financing on the transaction. The participation rights are
deemed to be embedded credit derivatives. These derivatives generated total unrealized losses of
$1.1 million and $3.5 million during 2009 and 2008,
respectively, representing the total amounts attributable to the ventures, not our proportionate share. Because of current market volatility, we
are experiencing significant fluctuation in the unrealized gains or losses generated from these
derivatives and expect this trend to continue until market conditions stabilize.
At December 31, 2009, substantially all of our non-recourse debt bore interest at fixed rates, was
swapped to a fixed rate or bore interest at a fixed rate but was scheduled to convert to variable
rates during their term. The annual interest rates on our fixed rate debt at December 31, 2009
ranged from 5.5% to 8.7%. The annual interest rates on our variable rate debt at December 31, 2009
ranged from 5.2% to 6.5%. Our debt obligations are more fully described in Financial Condition in
Item 7 above. The following table presents principal cash flows based upon expected maturity dates
of our debt obligations outstanding at December 31, 2009 (in thousands).
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Thereafter | Total | Fair value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt |
$ | 80,719 | $ | 266,222 | $ | 156,746 | $ | 4,535 | $ | 19,636 | $ | 156,426 | $ | 684,284 | $ | 642,901 | ||||||||||||||||
Variable rate debt |
$ | 5,543 | $ | 5,796 | $ | 5,837 | $ | 6,314 | $ | 6,792 | $ | 91,097 | $ | 121,379 | $ | 120,555 |
The estimated fair value of our fixed rate debt and our variable rate debt that currently bears
interest at fixed rates or has effectively been converted to a fixed rate through the use of
interest rate swap agreements is affected by changes in interest rates. A decrease or increase in
interest rates of 1% would change the estimated fair value of such debt at December 31, 2009 by an
aggregate increase of $22.0 million or an aggregate decrease of $20.9 million, respectively. Annual
interest expense on our unhedged variable rate debt that does not bear interest at fixed rates at
December 31, 2009 would increase or decrease by $0.1 million for each respective 1% change in
annual interest rates. As more fully described in Summary of Financing in Item 7 above, a
significant portion of the debt classified as variable rate bore interest at fixed rates at
December 31, 2009 but has interest rate reset features that will change the fixed interest rates to
variable rates at some point in the term. Such debt is generally not subject to short-term
fluctuations in interest rates.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We own investments in the European Union, and as a result we are subject to risk from the effects
of exchange rate movements, primarily in the Euro, which may affect future costs and cash flows. We
manage foreign exchange movements by generally placing both our debt obligation to the lender and
the tenants rental obligation to us in the same currency. For the year ended December 31, 2009,
Carrefour France SAS, which leases properties from us in France, contributed 13.7% of lease
revenues. We are currently a net receiver of the foreign currency (we receive more cash than we pay
out), and therefore our foreign investments benefit from a weaker U.S. dollar, and are adversely
affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to the foreign currency. For the year ended December
31, 2009, we recognized net realized foreign currency translation gains of $0.1 million and net
unrealized foreign currency translation losses of less than $0.1 million. These gains or losses are
included in the consolidated financial statements and were primarily due to changes in the value of
the foreign currency on accrued interest receivable on notes receivable from wholly-owned
subsidiaries.
To date, we have not entered into any foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge the
effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We have obtained non-recourse
mortgage financing at fixed rates of interest in the local currency. To the extent that currency
fluctuations increase or decrease rental revenues as translated to dollars, the change in debt
service, as translated to dollars, will partially offset the effect
of fluctuations in revenue and, to some extent, mitigate the risk from changes in foreign currency rates.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 39
Table of Contents
Scheduled future minimum rents, exclusive of renewals, under non-cancelable leases, for our foreign
operations during each of the next five years and thereafter, are as follows (in thousands):
Lease Revenues(a) | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Euro |
$ | 26,697 | $ | 24,679 | $ | 23,333 | $ | 23,676 | $ | 23,901 | $ | 51,643 | $ | 173,929 | ||||||||||||||
British pound sterling |
272 | 358 | 367 | 395 | 403 | 6,464 | 8,259 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 26,969 | $ | 25,037 | $ | 23,700 | $ | 24,071 | $ | 24,304 | $ | 58,107 | $ | 182,188 | |||||||||||||||
Scheduled debt service payments (principal and interest) for the mortgage notes payable for our
foreign operations during each of the next five years and thereafter, are as follows (in
thousands):
Debt Service (a) (b) | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Euro |
$ | 15,335 | $ | 15,142 | $ | 14,860 | $ | 14,854 | $ | 14,941 | $ | 221,483 | $ | 296,615 | ||||||||||||||
British pound sterling |
456 | 458 | 460 | 460 | 460 | 100,857 | 103,151 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 15,791 | $ | 15,600 | $ | 15,320 | $ | 15,314 | $ | 15,401 | $ | 322,340 | $ | 399,766 | |||||||||||||||
(a) | Based on the applicable exchange rate at December 31, 2009. Contractual rents and debt obligations are denominated in the functional currency of the country of each property. | |
(b) | Interest on unhedged variable rate debt obligations was calculated using the applicable annual interest rates and balances outstanding at December 31, 2009. |
Other
We own stock warrants that were granted to us by lessees in connection with structuring initial
lease transactions and that are defined as derivative instruments because they are readily
convertible to cash or provide for net settlement upon conversion. Changes in the fair value of
these derivative instruments are determined using an option pricing model and are recognized
currently in earnings as gains or losses. At December 31, 2009, warrants issued to us were
classified as derivative instruments and had an aggregate estimated fair value of $1.5 million.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 40
Table of Contents
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. |
The following financial statements and schedule are filed as a part of this Report:
42 | ||||
43 | ||||
44 | ||||
45 | ||||
46 | ||||
47 | ||||
49 | ||||
79 | ||||
82 |
Financial statement schedules other than those listed above are omitted because the required
information is given in the financial statements, including the notes thereto, or because the
conditions requiring their filing do not exist.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 41
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Corporate Property Associates 14 Incorporated:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Corporate Property Associates 14
Incorporated and its subsidiaries (the Company) at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 26, 2010
New York, New York
March 26, 2010
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 42
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 8. | Financial Statements |
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Investments in real estate: |
||||||||
Real estate, at cost |
$ | 1,255,966 | $ | 1,275,775 | ||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(215,967 | ) | (188,739 | ) | ||||
Net investment in properties |
1,039,999 | 1,087,036 | ||||||
Net investment in direct financing leases |
112,428 | 124,731 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
8,651 | | ||||||
Equity investments in real estate |
149,393 | 156,344 | ||||||
Net investments in real estate |
1,310,471 | 1,368,111 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
93,310 | 125,746 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
63,804 | 72,877 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
84,384 | 70,696 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,551,969 | $ | 1,637,430 | ||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Non-recourse debt |
$ | 805,663 | $ | 810,794 | ||||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
19,975 | 19,149 | ||||||
Prepaid and deferred rental income and security deposits |
28,108 | 25,650 | ||||||
Due to affiliates |
16,380 | 21,322 | ||||||
Distributions payable |
17,143 | 17,315 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
887,269 | 894,230 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) |
||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
CPA®:14 shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 120,000,000 shares authorized; 95,058,267
and 93,654,012
shares issued, respectively |
95 | 94 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
934,117 | 916,069 | ||||||
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings |
(190,437 | ) | (127,093 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
8,838 | 4,427 | ||||||
752,613 | 793,497 | |||||||
Less, treasury stock at cost, 8,955,254 and 5,804,003 shares, respectively |
(105,419 | ) | (66,845 | ) | ||||
Total CPA®:14 shareholders equity |
647,194 | 726,652 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
17,506 | 16,548 | ||||||
Total equity |
664,700 | 743,200 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 1,551,969 | $ | 1,637,430 | ||||
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 43
Table of Contents
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 147,184 | $ | 142,549 | $ | 138,638 | ||||||
Interest income from direct financing leases |
14,356 | 15,359 | 16,472 | |||||||||
Other operating income |
8,445 | 5,567 | 5,436 | |||||||||
169,985 | 163,475 | 160,546 | ||||||||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(36,167 | ) | (32,019 | ) | (32,576 | ) | ||||||
Property expenses |
(41,803 | ) | (33,094 | ) | (30,497 | ) | ||||||
General and administrative |
(6,747 | ) | (8,282 | ) | (7,957 | ) | ||||||
Impairment charges |
(40,345 | ) | (1,139 | ) | (345 | ) | ||||||
(125,062 | ) | (74,534 | ) | (71,375 | ) | |||||||
Other Income and Expenses |
||||||||||||
Income from equity investments in real estate |
13,845 | 637 | 17,089 | |||||||||
Other interest income |
1,558 | 4,121 | 3,950 | |||||||||
Other income and (expenses) |
1,446 | 3,847 | 10,979 | |||||||||
Advisor settlement (Note 14) |
| 10,868 | | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(61,326 | ) | (61,965 | ) | (63,262 | ) | ||||||
(44,477 | ) | (42,492 | ) | (31,244 | ) | |||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
446 | 46,449 | 57,927 | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
(3,337 | ) | (2,240 | ) | (1,948 | ) | ||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(2,891 | ) | 44,209 | 55,979 | ||||||||
Discontinued Operations |
||||||||||||
Income from operations of discontinued properties |
1,281 | 2,468 | 2,195 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate |
8,611 | 524 | 7,780 | |||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
9,892 | 2,992 | 9,975 | |||||||||
Net Income |
7,001 | 47,201 | 65,954 | |||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(1,685 | ) | (2,037 | ) | (1,564 | ) | ||||||
Net Income Attributable to CPA®:14 Shareholders |
$ | 5,316 | $ | 45,164 | $ | 64,390 | ||||||
Earnings Per Share |
||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to CPA®:14
shareholders |
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.62 | |||||
Income from discontinued operations attributable to CPA®:14 shareholders |
0.11 | 0.03 | 0.11 | |||||||||
Net income attributable to CPA®:14 shareholders |
$ | 0.06 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.73 | ||||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |
87,078,468 | 88,174,907 | 87,860,052 | |||||||||
Amounts Attributable to CPA®:14 Shareholders |
||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations, net of tax |
$ | (4,377 | ) | $ | 42,174 | $ | 54,413 | |||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
9,693 | 2,990 | 9,977 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 5,316 | $ | 45,164 | $ | 64,390 | ||||||
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 44
Table of Contents
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 7,001 | $ | 47,201 | $ | 65,954 | ||||||
Other Comprehensive Income: |
||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
823 | (9,006 | ) | 5,888 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities |
1,199 | (2,385 | ) | 385 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
2,426 | (2,256 | ) | | ||||||||
4,448 | (13,647 | ) | 6,273 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income |
11,449 | 33,554 | 72,227 | |||||||||
Amounts Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
(1,685 | ) | (2,037 | ) | (1,564 | ) | ||||||
Change in unrealized gain on marketable securities |
(37 | ) | | | ||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(1,722 | ) | (2,037 | ) | (1,564 | ) | ||||||
Comprehensive Income Attributable to CPA®:14 Shareholders |
$ | 9,727 | $ | 31,517 | $ | 70,663 | ||||||
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 45
Table of Contents
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
CPA:14 Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | in Excess of | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Paid-In | Accumulated | Comprehensive | Treasury | CPA®:14 | Noncontrolling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Stock | Capital | Earnings | Income | Stock | Shareholders | Interests | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
87,652,705 | $ | 90 | $ | 874,370 | $ | (99,485 | ) | $ | 11,801 | $ | (29,216 | ) | $ | 757,560 | $ | 19,465 | $ | 777,025 | |||||||||||||||||
Shares issued $.001 par, at $13.20 per share,
net of offering costs |
745,265 | 1 | 9,156 | 9,157 | 9,157 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares, $.001 par, issued to the advisor at
$13.20 per share |
852,132 | 1 | 11,247 | 11,248 | 11,248 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared ($0.7766 per share) |
(68,112 | ) | (68,112 | ) | (68,112 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| (2,996 | ) | (2,996 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
64,390 | 64,390 | 1,564 | 65,954 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
5,888 | 5,888 | 5,888 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain on
marketable securities |
385 | 385 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of shares |
(1,432,031 | ) | (17,556 | ) | (17,556 | ) | (17,556 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
87,818,071 | 92 | 894,773 | (103,207 | ) | 18,074 | (46,772 | ) | 762,960 | 18,033 | 780,993 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued $.001 par, at $14.00 - $14.50
per share, net of offering costs |
691,750 | 1 | 9,147 | 9,148 | 9,148 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares, $.001 par, issued to the advisor at
$14.00 - $14.50 per share |
850,258 | 1 | 12,149 | 12,150 | 12,150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared ($0.7848 per share) |
(69,050 | ) | (69,050 | ) | (69,050 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| (3,522 | ) | (3,522 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
45,164 | 45,164 | 2,037 | 47,201 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(9,006 | ) | (9,006 | ) | (9,006 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on marketable securities |
(2,385 | ) | (2,385 | ) | (2,385 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on derivative instrument |
(2,256 | ) | (2,256 | ) | (2,256 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of shares |
(1,510,070 | ) | (20,073 | ) | (20,073 | ) | (20,073 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
87,850,009 | 94 | 916,069 | (127,093 | ) | 4,427 | (66,845 | ) | 726,652 | 16,548 | 743,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued $.001 par, at $13.00 and $14.00
per share, net of offering costs |
667,773 | | 8,844 | 8,844 | 8,844 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares, $.001 par, issued to the advisor at
$13.00 per share |
736,482 | 1 | 9,204 | 9,205 | 9,205 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared ($0.7934 per share) |
(68,660 | ) | (68,660 | ) | (68,660 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
| (2,543 | ) | (2,543 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidation of a venture |
| 1,779 | 1,779 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
5,316 | 5,316 | 1,685 | 7,001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
823 | 823 | 823 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain on marketable securities |
1,162 | 1,162 | 37 | 1,199 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain on derivative instrument |
2,426 | 2,426 | 2,426 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of shares |
(3,151,251 | ) | (38,574 | ) | (38,574 | ) | (38,574 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
86,103,013 | $ | 95 | $ | 934,117 | $ | (190,437 | ) | $ | 8,838 | $ | (105,419 | ) | $ | 647,194 | $ | 17,506 | $ | 664,700 | |||||||||||||||||
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 46
Table of Contents
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Cash Flows Operating Activities |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,001 | $ | 47,201 | $ | 65,954 | ||||||
Adjustments to net income: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization, including intangible assets and deferred financing costs |
39,803 | 37,792 | 40,139 | |||||||||
Straight-line rent and financing lease adjustments |
1,766 | (1,225 | ) | (2,289 | ) | |||||||
Income from equity investments in real estate in excess of distributions received |
1,476 | 12,447 | 598 | |||||||||
Issuance of shares to affiliate in satisfaction of fees due |
9,204 | 12,150 | 11,346 | |||||||||
Realized gain on foreign currency transactions, derivative instruments and other, net |
(227 | ) | (3,435 | ) | (2,018 | ) | ||||||
Realized gain on sale of real estate |
(8,611 | ) | (1,062 | ) | (17,289 | ) | ||||||
Realized gain on sale of securities |
| (708 | ) | (1,648 | ) | |||||||
Unrealized (gain) loss on foreign currency transactions, derivative instruments and
other, net |
(1,219 | ) | 356 | (23 | ) | |||||||
Reversal of unrealized gain on derivative instruments |
| 708 | 2,207 | |||||||||
Impairment charges |
40,345 | 1,139 | 345 | |||||||||
Change in other operating assets and liabilities, net |
(1,638 | ) | 5,334 | (7,592 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
87,900 | 110,697 | 89,730 | |||||||||
Cash Flows Investing Activities |
||||||||||||
Equity distributions received in excess of equity income in real estate |
12,313 | 7,921 | 57,150 | |||||||||
Acquisitions of real estate and other capitalized costs |
(2,914 | ) | | (14,017 | ) | |||||||
Contributions to equity investments in real estate |
(5,344 | ) | (11,928 | ) | (18,647 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of a FDIC guaranteed unsecured note |
(5,000 | ) | | | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of real estate and securities |
26,247 | 15,765 | 52,380 | |||||||||
Exercise of common warrants |
| | (999 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in cash due to consolidation of a venture |
309 | | | |||||||||
Funds released from restricted account |
| | 617 | |||||||||
Payment of deferred acquisition fees to an affiliate |
(3,638 | ) | (3,846 | ) | (4,369 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
21,973 | 7,912 | 72,115 | |||||||||
Cash Flows Financing Activities |
||||||||||||
Distributions paid |
(68,832 | ) | (68,851 | ) | (68,323 | ) | ||||||
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests |
(2,543 | ) | (3,522 | ) | (2,996 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from mortgages and credit facility |
27,750 | 9,740 | 171,657 | |||||||||
Prepayment of mortgage principal and credit facility |
(22,219 | ) | (20,510 | ) | (134,074 | ) | ||||||
Scheduled payments of mortgage principal |
(44,873 | ) | (17,383 | ) | (16,552 | ) | ||||||
Deferred financing costs and mortgage deposits |
(962 | ) | (576 | ) | (768 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from stock issuance, net of costs |
8,844 | 9,148 | 9,059 | |||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(38,574 | ) | (20,073 | ) | (17,556 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(141,409 | ) | (112,027 | ) | (59,553 | ) | ||||||
(Continued)
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 47
Table of Contents
CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 14 INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, CONTINUED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, CONTINUED
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents During the Year |
||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(900 | ) | (3,339 | ) | 1,221 | |||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(32,436 | ) | 3,243 | 103,513 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
125,746 | 122,503 | 18,991 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
$ | 93,310 | $ | 125,746 | $ | 122,504 | ||||||
Supplemental cash flow information |
||||||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 58,411 | $ | 61,316 | $ | 60,805 | ||||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 4,412 | $ | 631 | $ | 931 | ||||||
No interest was capitalized in 2009, 2008 and 2007.
See
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 48
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Business and Organization
Corporate Property Associates 14 Incorporated is a publicly owned, non-actively traded REIT that
invests primarily in commercial properties leased to companies domestically and internationally. As
a REIT, we are not subject to U.S federal income taxation as long as we satisfy certain
requirements, principally relating to the nature of our income, the level of our distributions and
other factors. We earn revenue principally by leasing the properties we own to single corporate
tenants, on a triple-net leased basis, which requires the tenant to pay substantially all of the
costs associated with operating and maintaining the property. Revenue is subject to fluctuation
because of the timing of new lease transactions, lease terminations, lease expirations, contractual
rent increases, tenant defaults and sales of properties. At December 31, 2009, our portfolio was
comprised of our full or partial ownership interests in 314 properties, substantially all of which
were triple-net leased to 88 tenants, and totaled approximately 29 million square feet (on a pro
rata basis) with an occupancy rate of approximately 95%. We were formed in June 1997 and are
managed by the advisor.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements reflect all of our accounts, including those of our
majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries. The portion of equity in a subsidiary that is not
attributable, directly or indirectly, to us is presented as noncontrolling interests. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
When we obtain an economic interest in an entity, we evaluate the entity to determine if the entity
is deemed a variable interest entity, or VIE, and if we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary
under current authoritative accounting guidance. We consolidate (i) entities that are VIEs and of
which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary and (ii) entities that are non-VIEs that we
control. Entities that we account for under the equity method (i.e., at cost, increased or
decreased by our share of earnings or losses, less distributions, plus fundings) include (i)
entities that are VIEs and of which we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary and (ii)
entities that are non-VIEs that we do not control but over which we have the ability to exercise
significant influence. We will reconsider our determination of whether an entity is a VIE and who
the primary beneficiary is if certain events occur that are likely to cause a change in the
original determinations.
In determining whether we control a non-VIE, we consider that the general partners in a limited
partnership (or similar entity) are presumed to control the entity regardless of the level of their
ownership and, accordingly, may be required to consolidate the entity. This presumption may be
overcome if the agreements provide the limited partners with either (a) the substantive ability to
dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partners without cause
or (b) substantive participating rights. If it is deemed that the limited partners rights overcome
the presumption of control by a general partner of the limited partnership, the general partner
must account for its investment in the limited partnership using the equity method of accounting.
We hold ownership interests in certain limited liability companies and limited partnerships that
exceed 50% and through which we exercise significant influence. Because our venture partners, which
are affiliates, are the managing members or general partners in the limited liability companies or
limited partnerships and no unaffiliated parties have substantive kick-out or participation rights,
the venture partners are required to consolidate the investments and, therefore, we account for
these investments under the equity method of accounting.
We have investments in tenant-in-common interests in various domestic and international properties.
Consolidation of these investments is not required as they do not qualify as VIEs and do not meet
the control requirement required for consolidation. Accordingly, we account for these investments
using the equity method of accounting. We use the equity method of accounting because the shared
decision-making involved in a tenant-in-common interest investment creates an opportunity for us to
have significant influence on the operating and financial decisions of these investments and
thereby creates some responsibility by us for a return on our investment.
We have several interests in consolidated ventures that have noncontrolling
interests with finite
lives. As these are not considered to be mandatorily redeemable
noncontrolling interests, we have reflected them as Noncontrolling
interests in equity in the consolidated financial statements. The carrying value of these noncontrolling interests at December 31, 2009 and
2008 was $11.4 million and $11.9 million, respectively. The fair value of these noncontrolling
interests at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $24.8 million and $22.5 million, respectively.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 49
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Out-of-Period Adjustments
During the first quarter of 2007, we identified errors in the consolidated financial statements for
the years ended December 31, 2003 2006. These errors related to accounting for foreign income
taxes (aggregating $0.4 million over the period from 2003-2006) and valuation of stock warrants
(aggregating $1.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2006) that are accounted for as derivative
instruments because of net cash settlement features. In addition, during the third quarter of 2007,
we determined that a longer schedule of depreciation and amortization of assets in certain of our
equity method investment holdings should appropriately be applied to reflect the lives of the
underlying assets rather than the expected holding period of these investments. This effectively
understated our income from equity investments in real estate by $1.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
We concluded that these adjustments were not material to any prior periods consolidated financial
statements. We also concluded that the cumulative adjustments were not material to the year ended
December 31, 2007. As such, the cumulative effects were recorded in the consolidated statements of
income as out-of-period adjustments in the periods the issues were identified. The effect of these
adjustments was to decrease income from continuing operations before income taxes by $0.8 million,
increase the provision for income taxes by $0.4 million and decrease net income by $1.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and the disclosure of contingent amounts
in our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Reclassifications and Revisions
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The
consolidated financial statements included in this Report have been retrospectively adjusted to
reflect the adoption of accounting guidance for noncontrolling interests during the year ended
December 31, 2009, as well as the disposition (or planned disposition) of certain properties as
discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Purchase Price Allocation
When we acquire properties accounted for as operating leases, including those properties acquired
in the Merger, we allocate the purchase costs to the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities
acquired based on their estimated fair values. We determine the value of the tangible assets,
consisting of land and buildings, as if vacant, and record intangible assets, including the
above-market and below-market value of leases, the value of in-place leases and the value of tenant
relationships, at their relative estimated fair values. See Real Estate Leased to Others and
Depreciation below for a discussion of our significant accounting policies related to tangible
assets. We include the value of below-market leases in Prepaid and deferred rental income and
security deposits in the consolidated financial statements.
We record above-market and below-market lease values for owned properties based on the present
value (using an interest rate reflecting the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the
difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the leases negotiated and in
place at the time of acquisition of the properties and (ii) our estimate of fair market lease rates
for the property or equivalent property, both of which are measured over a period equal to the
estimated market lease term. We amortize the capitalized above-market lease value as a reduction of
rental income over the estimated market lease term. We amortize the capitalized below-market lease
value as an increase to rental income over the initial term and any fixed rate renewal periods in
the respective leases.
We allocate the total amount of other intangibles to in-place lease values and tenant relationship
intangible values based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenants lease
and our overall relationship with each tenant. The characteristics we consider in allocating these
values include estimated market rent, the nature and extent of the existing relationship with the
tenant, the expectation of lease renewals, estimated carrying costs of the property if vacant and
estimated costs to execute a new lease, among other factors. We determine these values using third
party appraisals or our estimates. We amortize the capitalized value of in-place lease intangibles
to expense over the remaining
initial term of each lease. We amortize the capitalized value of tenant relationships to expense
over the initial and expected renewal terms of the lease. No amortization period for intangibles
will exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building.
If a lease is terminated, we charge the unamortized portion of each intangible, including
above-market and below-market lease values, in-place lease values and tenant relationship values,
to expense.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 50
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all short-term, highly liquid investments that are both readily convertible to cash and
have a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Items
classified as cash equivalents include commercial paper and money-market funds. At December 31,
2009 and 2008, our cash and cash equivalents were held in the custody of several financial
institutions, and these balances, at times, exceeded federally insurable limits. We seek to
mitigate this risk by depositing funds only with major financial institutions.
Marketable Securities
Marketable securities, which consist of an interest in collateralized mortgage obligations (Note 8)
and common stock in publicly-traded companies, are classified as available for sale securities and
reported at fair value, with any unrealized gains and losses on these securities reported as a
component of Other comprehensive income (OCI) until realized.
Other Assets and Other Liabilities
We include escrow balances and tenant security deposits held by lenders, restricted cash balances,
common stock warrants, prepaid expenses, marketable securities, deferred charges, deferred rental
income and notes receivable in Other assets. We include derivative instruments and miscellaneous
amounts held on behalf of tenants in Other liabilities. Deferred charges are costs incurred in
connection with mortgage financings and refinancings that are amortized over the terms of the
mortgages and included in Interest expense in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred
rental income is the aggregate cumulative difference for operating leases between scheduled rents
that vary during the lease term, and rent recognized on a straight-line basis.
Deferred Acquisition Fees Payable to Affiliate
Fees payable to the advisor for structuring and negotiating investments and related mortgage
financing on our behalf are included in Due to affiliates. A portion of these fees is payable in
equal annual installments each January of the seven calendar years following the date a property
was purchased. Payment of such fees is subject to the performance criterion (Note 3).
Treasury Stock
Treasury stock is recorded at cost.
Real Estate Leased to Others
We lease real estate to others primarily on a triple-net leased basis, whereby the tenant is
generally responsible for all operating expenses relating to the property, including property
taxes, insurance, maintenance, repairs, renewals and improvements. We charge expenditures for
maintenance and repairs, including routine betterments, to operations as incurred. We capitalize
significant renovations that increase the useful life of the
properties. For the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, although we are legally obligated for the payment, pursuant to our lease
agreements with our tenants, lessees were responsible for the direct payment to the taxing
authorities of real estate taxes of $17.6 million,
$19.0 million and $18.6 million, respectively.
We diversify our real estate investments among various corporate tenants engaged in different
industries, by property type and by geographic area (Note 10). Substantially all of our leases
provide for either scheduled rent increases, periodic rent adjustments based on formulas indexed to
changes in the CPI or similar indices or percentage rents. CPI-based adjustments are contingent on
future events and are therefore not included in straight-line rent calculations. We recognize rents
from percentage rents as reported by the lessees, which is after the level of sales requiring a
rental payment to us is reached.
We account for leases as operating or direct financing leases as described below:
Operating leases We record real estate at cost less accumulated depreciation; we recognize future
minimum rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the related leases and charge
expenses (including depreciation) to operations as incurred (Note 4).
Direct financing method We record leases accounted for under the direct financing method at their
net investment (Note 5). We defer and amortize unearned income to income over the lease term so as
to produce a constant periodic rate of return on our net investment in the lease.
On an ongoing basis, we assess our ability to collect rent and other tenant-based receivables and
determine an appropriate allowance for uncollected amounts. Because we have a limited number of
lessees (19 lessees represented 62% of lease revenues during 2009), we believe that it is necessary
to evaluate the collectibility of these receivables based on the facts and circumstances of each
situation rather than solely using statistical methods. Therefore, in recognizing our provision for
uncollected rents and other tenant receivables, we evaluate actual past due amounts and make
subjective judgments as to the collectability of those amounts based on factors including, but not
limited to, our knowledge of a lessees circumstances, the age of the receivables, the tenants
credit profile and prior experience with the tenant. Even if a lessee has been making payments, we
may reserve for the entire receivable amount if we believe there has been significant or continuing
deterioration in the lessees ability to meet its lease obligations.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 51
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Depreciation
We compute depreciation of building and related improvements using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the properties or improvements, which range from 3 to 40 years. We
compute depreciation of tenant improvements using the straight-line method over the lesser of the
remaining term of the lease or the estimated useful life.
Impairments
We periodically assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our long-lived assets may
be impaired or that their carrying value may not be recoverable. These impairment indicators
include, but are not limited to, the vacancy of a property that is not subject to a lease; a lease
default by a tenant that is experiencing financial difficulty; the termination of a lease by a
tenant or the rejection of a lease in a bankruptcy proceeding. Impairment charges do not
necessarily reflect the true economic loss caused by the default of the tenant, which may be
greater or less than the impairment amount. In addition, we use
non-recourse debt to finance our acquisitions, and to the extent that the value of an asset is written down to below the value of its debt, there is
an unrealized gain that will be triggered when we turn the asset back to the lender in satisfaction
of the debt. We may incur impairment charges on long-lived assets, including real estate, direct
financing leases, assets held for sale and equity investments in real estate. We may also incur
impairment charges on marketable securities. Our policies for evaluating whether these assets are
impaired are presented below.
Real Estate
For real estate assets in which an impairment indicator is identified, we follow a two-step process
to determine whether an asset is impaired and to determine the amount of the charge. First, we
compare the carrying value of the property to the future net undiscounted cash flow that we expect
the property will generate, including any estimated proceeds from the eventual sale of the
property. The undiscounted cash flow analysis requires us to make our best estimate of market
rents, residual values and holding periods. Depending on the assumptions made and estimates used,
the future cash flow projected in the evaluation of long-lived assets can vary within a range of
outcomes. We consider the likelihood of possible outcomes in determining the best possible estimate
of future cash flows. If the future net undiscounted cash flow of the property is less than the
carrying value, the property is considered to be impaired. We then measure the loss as the excess
of the carrying value of the property over its estimated fair value, as determined using market
information. In cases where the available market information is not deemed appropriate, we perform
a future net cash flow analysis discounted for inherent risk associated with each asset to
determine an estimated fair value.
Direct Financing Leases
We review our direct financing leases at least annually to determine whether there has been an
other-than-temporary decline in the current estimate of residual value of the property. The
residual value is our estimate of what we could realize upon the sale of the property at the end of
the lease term, based on market information. If this review indicates that a decline in residual
value has occurred that is other-than-temporary, we recognize an impairment charge and revise the
accounting for the direct financing lease to reflect a portion of the future cash flow from the
lessee as a return of principal rather than as revenue. While we evaluate direct financing leases
if there are any indicators that the residual value may be impaired, the evaluation of a direct
financing lease can be affected by changes in long-term market conditions even though the
obligations of the lessee are being met.
Assets Held for Sale
We classify assets that are accounted for as operating leases as held for sale when we have entered
into a contract to sell the property, all material due diligence requirements have been satisfied
and we believe it is probable that the disposition will occur within one year. When we classify an
asset as held for sale, we calculate its estimated fair value as the expected sale price, less
expected selling costs. We then compare the assets estimated fair value to its carrying value, and
if the estimated fair value is less than the propertys carrying value, we reduce the carrying
value to the estimated fair value. We will continue to review the property for subsequent changes
in the estimated fair value, and may recognize an additional impairment charge if warranted.
If circumstances arise that we previously considered unlikely and, as a result, we decide not to
sell a property previously classified as held for sale, we reclassify the property as held and
used. We record a property that is reclassified as held and used at the lower of (a)
its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any
depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified
as held and used, or (b) the estimated fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to
sell.
Equity Investments in Real Estate
We evaluate our equity investments in real estate on a periodic basis to determine if there are any
indicators that the value of our equity investment may be impaired and whether or not that
impairment is other-than-temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, we measure the charge as
the excess of the carrying value of our investment over its estimated fair value, which is
determined by multiplying the estimated fair value of the underlying ventures net assets by our
ownership interest percentage.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 52
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Marketable Securities
We evaluate our marketable securities for impairment if a decline in estimated fair value below
cost basis is significant and/or has lasted for an extended period of time. We review the
underlying cause of the decline in value and the estimated recovery period, as well as the severity
and duration of the decline, to determine if the decline is other-than-temporary. In our
evaluation, we consider our ability and intent to hold these investments for a reasonable period of
time sufficient for us to recover our cost basis. We also evaluate the near-term prospects for each
of these investments in relation to the severity and duration of the decline. If we determine that
the decline is other-than-temporary, we record an impairment charge to reduce our cost basis to the
estimated fair value of the security.
Assets Held for Sale
We classify assets that are accounted for as operating leases as held for sale when we have entered
into a contract to sell the property, all material due diligence requirements have been satisfied
and we believe it is probable that the disposition will occur within one year. Assets held for sale
are recorded at the lower of carrying value or estimated fair value,
which is generally calculated as the expected sale price, less expected selling costs. The results
of operations and the related gain or loss on sale of properties that have been sold or that are
classified as held for sale are included in discontinued operations (Note 17).
If circumstances arise that we previously considered unlikely and, as a result, we decide not to
sell a property previously classified as held for sale, we reclassify the property as held and
used. We record a property that is reclassified as held and used at the
lower of (a) its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for
any depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously
classified as held and used, or (b) the estimated fair value at the date of the subsequent decision
not to sell.
We recognize gains and losses on the sale of properties when, among other criteria, the parties are
bound by the terms of the contract, all consideration has been exchanged and all conditions
precedent to closing have been performed. At the time the sale is consummated, a gain or loss is
recognized as the difference between the sale price, less any selling costs, and the carrying value
of the property.
Foreign Currency Translation
We have interests in real estate investments in the European Union for which the functional
currencies are the Euro and British pound sterling. The translation from these local currencies to
the U.S. dollar is performed for assets and liabilities using current exchange rates in effect at
the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using a weighted average exchange rate
during the period. The gains and losses resulting from this translation are reported as a component
of OCI in equity. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the cumulative foreign currency translation
adjustment gain was $8.7 million and $7.9 million, respectively.
Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the
amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid. A change in the exchange rates between
the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or
decreases the expected amount of functional currency cash flows upon settlement of that
transaction. That increase or decrease in the expected functional currency cash flows is an
unrealized foreign currency transaction gain or loss that generally will be included in determining
net income for the period in which the exchange rate changes. Likewise, a transaction gain or loss
(measured from the transaction date or the most recent intervening balance sheet date, whichever is
later), realized upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction generally will be included in
net income for the period in which the transaction is settled. Foreign currency transactions that
are (i) designated as, and are effective as, economic hedges of a net investment and (ii)
intercompany foreign currency transactions that are of a long-term nature (that is, settlement is
not planned or anticipated in the foreseeable future), when the entities to the transactions are
consolidated or accounted for by the equity method in our financial statements, are not included in
determining net income but are accounted for in the same manner as foreign currency translation
adjustments and reported as a component of OCI in equity. Investments in international equity
investments in real estate are funded in part through subordinated intercompany debt.
Foreign currency intercompany transactions that are scheduled for settlement, consisting primarily
of accrued interest and the translation to the reporting currency of intercompany subordinated debt
with scheduled principal repayments, are included in the determination of net income. We recognized
unrealized losses from such transactions of less than $0.1 million for both years ended December
31, 2009 and 2008 and $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. For the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we recognized realized gains of $0.1 million, $3.4 million and
$2.0 million, respectively, on foreign currency transactions in connection with the transfer of
cash from foreign operations of subsidiaries to the parent company.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 53
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Derivative Instruments
We measure derivative instruments at fair value and record them as assets or liabilities, depending
on our rights or obligations under the applicable derivative contract. Derivatives that are not
designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. If a derivative is
designated as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the
derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset, liability,
or firm commitment through earnings, or recognized in OCI until the hedged item is recognized in
earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivatives change in fair value will be immediately
recognized in earnings.
Income Taxes
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required, among other
things, to distribute at least 90% of our REIT net taxable income to our shareholders and meet
certain tests regarding the nature of our income and assets. As a REIT, we are not subject to
federal income tax with respect to the portion of our income that meets certain criteria and is
distributed annually to shareholders. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes is
included in the consolidated financial statements with respect to these operations. We believe we
have operated, and we intend to continue to operate, in a manner that allows us to continue to meet
the requirements for taxation as a REIT.
We conduct business in various states and municipalities within the U.S. and the European Union
and, as a result, we or one or more of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction and various state and certain foreign jurisdictions. As a result, we are subject to
certain foreign, state and local taxes and a provision for such taxes is included in the
consolidated financial statements. The tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2007
included $0.4 million in expenses related to the years ended December 31, 2003 2006 that had not
previously been accrued (see Out-of-Period Adjustments above).
Significant judgment is required in determining our tax provision and in evaluating our tax
positions. We establish tax reserves based on a benefit recognition model, which we believe could
result in a greater amount of benefit (and a lower amount of reserve) being initially recognized in
certain circumstances. Provided that the tax position is deemed more likely than not of being
sustained, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of
being ultimately realized upon settlement. We derecognize the tax position when it is no longer
more likely than not of being sustained.
Earnings Per Share
We have a simple equity capital structure with only common stock outstanding. As a result, earnings
per share, as presented, represents both basic and dilutive per-share amounts for all periods
presented in the consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for subsequent events, which we adopted as
required in the second quarter of 2009. The guidance establishes general standards of accounting
for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued.
Future Accounting Requirements
In June 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance related to the consolidation of VIEs. These
amendments require an enterprise to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary
beneficiary of a VIE based on whether the entity (1) has the power to direct matters that most
significantly impact the activities of the VIE, and (2) has the obligation to absorb losses or the
right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The
amendments change the consideration of kick-out rights in determining if an entity is a VIE, which
may cause certain additional entities to now be considered VIEs. Additionally, they require an
ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary and provide a framework for the events that
trigger a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. This guidance is effective for us beginning
January 1, 2010. We are currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of the new
guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.
Note 3. Agreements and Transactions with Related Parties
We have an advisory agreement with the advisor whereby the advisor performs certain services for us
for a fee. Under the terms of this agreement, which was amended and renewed effective October 1,
2009, the advisor manages our day-to-day operations, for which we pay the advisor asset management
and performance fees, and structures and negotiates the purchase and sale of investments and debt
placement transactions for us, for which we pay the advisor structuring and subordinated
disposition fees. In addition, we reimburse the advisor for certain administrative duties
performed on our behalf. We also have certain agreements with joint ventures. These transactions
are described below.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 54
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Asset Management and Performance Fees
Under the advisory agreement, we pay the advisor asset management and performance fees, each of
which are 1/2 of 1% per annum of average invested assets and are
computed as provided for in the advisory agreement. The performance fees are subordinated to the
performance criterion, a cumulative rate of cash flow from operations of 7% per annum. The asset
management and performance fees are payable in cash or restricted shares of our common stock at the
advisors option. If the advisor elects to receive all or a portion of its fees in restricted
shares, the number of restricted shares issued is determined by dividing the dollar amount of fees
by our most recently published estimated net asset value per share as approved by our board of
directors. For 2009, 2008 and 2007, the advisor elected to receive its asset management fees in
cash. For 2009, the advisor elected to receive 80% of its performance fees from us in restricted
shares of our common stock, with the remaining 20% payable in cash. For 2008 and 2007, the advisor
elected to receive its performance fees in restricted shares of our common stock. We incurred base
asset management fees of $11.0 million, $12.1 million and $12.0 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, with performance fees in like amounts, both of which are included in Property
expenses in the consolidated financial statements. At December 31, 2009, the advisor owned
7,330,233 shares (8.5%) of our common stock.
Transaction Fees
Under the advisory agreement, we also pay the advisor acquisition fees for structuring and
negotiating investments and related mortgage financing on our behalf. Acquisition fees average 4.5%
or less of the aggregate costs of investments acquired and are comprised of a current portion of
2.5%, which is paid at the date the property is purchased, and a deferred portion of 2%, which is
payable in equal annual installments each January of the seven calendar years following the date a
property was purchased, subject to satisfying the 7% performance criterion. Interest on unpaid
installments is 6% per year. In connection with the Merger, we assumed deferred fees incurred by
CPA®:12 totaling $2.7 million that bear interest at an annual rate of 7% and have
scheduled installment payments through 2018. During 2009, we incurred
both current and deferred
acquisition fees of $0.1 million. During 2007, we incurred
current and deferred acquisition fees of $3.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively. We did not
incur any such fees during 2008. Unpaid deferred installments totaled $6.9 million and $10.5
million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and were included in Due to affiliates in the
consolidated financial statements. We paid annual deferred acquisition fee installments of $3.6
million, $3.8 million and $4.4 million in deferred fees in cash to the advisor in January 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively. We also pay the advisor mortgage refinancing fees, which totaled $0.4
million and $0.9 million for 2009 and 2008, respectively. No such mortgage refinancing fees were
paid during 2007.
We also pay fees to the advisor for services provided to us in connection with the disposition of
investments, excluding investments acquired in the Merger. These fees, which are subordinated to
the performance criterion and certain other provisions included in the advisory agreement, are
deferred and are payable to the advisor only in connection with a liquidity event. Subordinated
disposition fees totaled $5.7 million and $5.1 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Other Expenses
We reimburse the advisor for various expenses it incurs in the course of providing services to us.
We reimburse certain third-party expenses paid by the advisor on our behalf, including
property-specific costs, professional fees, office expenses and business development expenses. In
addition, we reimburse the advisor for the allocated costs of personnel and overhead in providing
management of our day-to-day operations, including accounting services, shareholder services,
corporate management, and property management and operations. We do not reimburse the advisor for
the cost of personnel if these personnel provide services for transactions for which the advisor
receives a transaction fee, such as acquisitions, dispositions and refinancings. We incurred
personnel reimbursements of $2.5 million, $2.6 million, $3.5 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, which are included in General and administrative expenses in the consolidated
financial statements.
The advisor is obligated to reimburse us for the amount by which our operating expenses exceed the
2%/25% guidelines (the greater of 2% of average invested assets or 25% of net income) as defined in
the advisory agreement for any twelve-month period. If in any year our operating expenses exceed
the 2%/25% guidelines, the advisor will have an obligation to reimburse us for such excess, subject
to certain conditions. If our independent directors find that the excess expenses were justified
based on any unusual and nonrecurring factors that they deem sufficient, the advisor may be paid in
future years for the full amount or any portion of such excess expenses, but only to the extent
that the reimbursement would not cause our operating expenses to exceed this limit in any such
year. We will record any reimbursement of operating expenses as a liability until any
contingencies are resolved and will record the reimbursement as a reduction of asset management and
performance fees at such time that a reimbursement is fixed, determinable and irrevocable. Our
operating expenses have not exceeded the amount that would require the advisor to reimburse us.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 55
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Joint Ventures and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Together with certain affiliates, we participate in an entity that leases office space used for the
administration of real estate entities. Under the terms of an agreement among the participants in
this entity, rental, occupancy and leasehold improvement costs are allocated among the participants
based on gross revenues and are adjusted quarterly. Our share of expenses incurred was $0.7 million
in each of 2009, 2008 and 2007. Based on gross revenues through December 31, 2009, our current
share of future minimum lease payments under this agreement would be $0.6 million annually through
2016.
We own interests in entities ranging from 12% to 90%, as well as jointly-controlled
tenant-in-common interests in properties, with the remaining interests generally held by
affiliates. We consolidate certain of these investments (Note 2) and account for the remainder
under the equity method of accounting (Note 6).
Note 4. Net Investments in Properties
Net Investments in Properties
Net investments in properties, which consists of land and buildings leased to others, at cost, and
accounted for as operating leases, is summarized as follows (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Land |
$ | 228,279 | $ | 231,325 | ||||
Buildings |
1,027,687 | 1,044,450 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
(215,967 | ) | (188,739 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,039,999 | $ | 1,087,036 | |||||
Scheduled future minimum rents, exclusive of renewals and expenses paid by tenants, percentage of
sales rents and future CPI-based adjustments, under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows
(in thousands):
Years ending December 31, | ||||
2010 |
$ | 140,392 | ||
2011 |
137,682 | |||
2012 |
136,012 | |||
2013 |
136,039 | |||
2014 |
134,658 | |||
Thereafter through 2031 |
590,072 |
Percentage rent revenue for operating leases was less than $0.1 million in 2009 and 2008. There
was no percentage rent revenue for operating leases in 2007.
Acquisition Costs
We adopted the FASBs revised guidance for business combinations on January 1, 2009. The revised
guidance establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination
must recognize and measure in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interests in the entity acquired, and goodwill acquired in
a business combination. Additionally, the revised guidance requires that an acquiring entity must
immediately expense all acquisition costs and fees associated with a business combination, while
such costs are capitalized for transactions deemed to be acquisitions of an asset. To the extent we
make investments that are deemed to be business combinations, our results of operations will be
negatively impacted by the immediate expensing of acquisition costs and fees incurred in accordance
with the revised guidance, whereas in the past such costs and fees would have been capitalized and
allocated to the cost basis of the acquisition. Post acquisition, there will be a subsequent
positive impact on our results of operations through a reduction in depreciation expense over the
estimated life of the properties. For those investments that are not deemed to be a business
combination, the revised guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements. Historically, we have not acquired investments that would be deemed a
business combination under the revised guidance. During 2009, we completed a domestic investment
for $2.5 million that was deemed to be a
real estate asset acquisition and, as such, capitalized acquisition fees of $0.1 million in
connection with this investment. We did not make any investments that were deemed to be business
combinations during 2009.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 56
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Tenant Matters
We have six tenants that operated under bankruptcy protection during some or all of 2009. During
2009, uncollected rent expense increased by $8.6 million as compared to 2008, substantially all of
which is related to these tenants. During 2009, four of these tenants disaffirmed their leases with
us in bankruptcy court and the properties are vacant at December 31, 2009. These tenants previously
accounted for $13.1 million, or 8.5%, of aggregate annualized lease revenues. As a result of these
corporate defaults, during the third and fourth quarters of 2009, we suspended debt service on
three non-recourse mortgage loans related to these properties, which had an aggregate outstanding
balance of $54.1 million at December 31, 2009.
Note 5. Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases
Net investment in direct financing leases is summarized as follows (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Minimum lease payments receivable |
$ | 154,586 | $ | 199,384 | ||||
Unguaranteed residual value |
107,588 | 120,009 | ||||||
262,174 | 319,393 | |||||||
Less: unearned income |
(149,746 | ) | (194,662 | ) | ||||
$ | 112,428 | $ | 124,731 | |||||
Scheduled future minimum rents, exclusive of renewals and expenses paid by tenants, percentage of
sales rents and future CPI-based adjustments, under non-cancelable direct financing leases are as
follows (in thousands):
Years ending December 31, | ||||
2010 |
$ | 14,157 | ||
2011 |
14,256 | |||
2012 |
14,256 | |||
2013 |
14,256 | |||
2014 |
14,256 | |||
Thereafter through 2023 |
83,405 |
There was no percentage rent revenue for direct financing leases in 2009 and 2008. Percentage rent
revenue for direct financing leases was $0.1 million in 2007.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 57
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6. Equity Investments in Real Estate
We own interests in single-tenant net leased properties leased to corporations through
noncontrolling interests in (i) partnerships and limited liability companies in which our ownership
interests are 67% or less but over which we exercise significant influence, and (ii) as
tenants-in-common subject to common control (Note 2). All of the underlying investments are
generally owned with affiliates. We account for these investments under the equity method of
accounting (i.e., at cost, increased or decreased by our share of earnings or losses, less
distributions plus fundings).
During 2009, we incurred impairment charges totaling $40.3 million on several of our consolidated
investments. Primarily as a result of these impairment charges, our 2009 results reflect a loss
from continuing operations before income taxes attributable to CPA®:14 shareholders.
Because of the loss reflected in our 2009 results, we have provided disaggregated summarized
financial information for our unconsolidated ventures in the tables below.
The following table sets forth our ownership interests in our equity investments in real estate and
their respective carrying values. The carrying value of these ventures is affected by the timing
and nature of distributions (dollars in thousands):
Ownership | ||||||||||||||
Interest at | Carrying Value at December 31, | |||||||||||||
Lessee | Subsidiary Name(s) | December 31, 2009 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. |
Delaware Chip LLC | 67 | % | $ | 33,571 | $ | 29,579 | |||||||
True Value Company |
Bolt (DE) LP, Hammer (DE) LP and Wrench (DE) LP | 50 | % | 31,433 | 31,916 | |||||||||
Hellweg Die Profi-Baumarkte GmbH & Co. KG (a) |
HLWG Two (Ger) LLC and HLWG Two Lender SARL | 32 | % | 15,369 | 19,399 | |||||||||
U-Haul Moving Partners, Inc. and Mercury Partners, LP |
UH Storage (DE) LP | 12 | % | 12,639 | 12,992 | |||||||||
The Upper Deck Company |
Cards LLC | 50 | % | 11,491 | 11,673 | |||||||||
Best Buy Co., Inc. (b) |
BB (Multi) LP | 37 | % | 11,183 | 12,469 | |||||||||
Life Time Fitness, Inc. and Town Sports International
Holdings, Inc. |
LT Landlord (MN-FL) LLC and Bos Club LL (MA) LLC | 56 | % | 10,343 | 10,898 | |||||||||
Compucom Systems, Inc. (b) |
Comp Delaware LP | 67 | % | 8,638 | 10,958 | |||||||||
Del Monte Corporation (b) |
Delmo 11/12 (DE) LLC | 50 | % | 7,233 | 8,135 | |||||||||
ShopRite Supermarkets, Inc. |
BVNY (DE) LLC | 45 | % | 6,719 | 6,696 | |||||||||
Checkfree Holdings, Inc. |
Carey Norcross LLC | 50 | % | 1,506 | 1,653 | |||||||||
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
Gena LLC | 50 | % | | 493 | |||||||||
Dicks Sporting Goods, Inc. |
CP GAL Plainfield LLC | 45 | % | (732 | ) | (517 | ) | |||||||
$ | 149,393 | $ | 156,344 | |||||||||||
(a) | Carrying value of investment is affected by the impact of fluctuations in the exchange rate of the Euro. | |
(b) | Decrease was primarily due to amortization of differences between the fair value of the investment at the date of acquisition of the venture and the carrying value of its net assets at that date. |
Advanced Micro Devices
In connection with a mortgage refinancing in 2008, we contributed $11.9 million to Delaware Chip
LLC to refinance its then-existing $59.8 million non-recourse mortgage loan for new non-recourse
financing of $43.0 million. In July 2009, Delaware Chip LLC restructured its existing debt and
made an $8.0 million partial paydown of the loan, reducing the balance to $33.5 million at December
31, 2009.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 58
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Hellweg Die Profi-Baumarkte GmbH & Co. KG
In April 2007, we acquired an interest in a venture (HLWG Two (Ger) LLC) that in turn acquired a
24.7% ownership interest in a limited partnership owning 37 properties throughout Germany. We also
acquired an interest in a second venture (HLWG Two Lender SARL), which made a loan (the note
receivable) to the holder of the remaining 75.3% interests in the limited partnership (the
partner). Our total effective ownership interest in HLWG Two (Ger) LLC and HLWG Two Lender SARL
is 32%. The total cost of the interests in these ventures, which are owned with affiliates, was
$446,387. In connection with these transactions, the ventures obtained combined non-recourse
financing of $378,596, having a fixed annual interest rate of 5.5% and a term of 10 years. All
amounts are based upon the exchange rate of the Euro at the date of acquisition.
Under the terms of the note receivable, the lending venture will receive interest that approximates
75% of all income earned by the limited partnership, less adjustments. HLWG Two (Ger) LLC accounts
for the partners interest in the limited partnership as a redeemable noncontrolling interest
because the transaction contains put options that, if exercised, would obligate the partners to
settle in cash, as described below. The partners interests are reflected at estimated redemption
value in the disaggregated financial statements set forth below for all periods presented.
In connection with the acquisition, HLWG Two (Ger) LLC agreed to an option agreement which gives
HLWG Two (Ger) LLC the right to purchase, from the partner, an additional 75% interest in the
limited partnership no later than December 2010 at a price which will equal the principal amount of
the note receivable at the time of purchase. Upon exercise of this purchase option, HLWG Two (Ger)
LLC would own 99.7% of the limited partnership. HLWG Two (Ger) LLC has also agreed to a second
assignable option agreement to acquire the remaining 0.3% interest in the limited partnership by
December 2012. If HLWG Two (Ger) LLC does not exercise its option agreements, the partner has
option agreements to put its remaining interests in the limited partnership to HLWG Two (Ger) LLC
during 2014 at a price which will equal the principal amount of the note receivable at the time of
purchase.
Upper Deck
During the fourth quarter of 2009, we recognized an impairment charge of $0.7 million to reduce the
carrying value of this venture to its estimated fair value (Note 11).
Compucom Systems
In April 2009, Comp Delaware LP refinanced its existing non-recourse mortgage debt of $18.7
million, which was scheduled to mature in May 2009, for new non-recourse financing of $22.6
million. Comp Delaware LP distributed the net proceeds of the financing to the venture partners.
Del Monte Corporation
The carrying value of our investment in properties leased to Del Monte Corporation reflects our
investment in properties owned through Delmo 11/12 (DE) LLC as well as a property in which we have
a 50% tenant-in-common interest.
Amylin Pharmaceuticals
In 2007, this venture completed the refinancing of an existing $2.5 million non-recourse mortgage
with new non-recourse financing of $35.4 million based on the appraised value of the underlying
real estate of the venture. As a result of the refinancing, we became the general partner of the
venture. During 2009, we recorded an adjustment to record the venture under the consolidation
method as we have control over the venture.
Dicks Sporting Goods
In January 2007, CP GAL Plainfield LLC obtained non-recourse mortgage financing of $23.0 million
and distributed the proceeds to the venture partners. Although we are not obligated to do so, based
on the fair value of the property, we expect to fund any deficits CP GAL Plainfield LLC may incur.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 59
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following tables present summarized balance sheet information for our equity investments in
real estate. Amounts provided are the total amounts attributable to the ventures and do not
represent our proportionate share (in thousands):
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HLWG | LT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bos Club | Carey | Comp | CP GAL | Delmo | HLWG | Two | Landlord | UH | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB (Multi) | Bolt (DE) | LL (MA) | BVNY | Norcross | Delaware | Plainfield | Delaware | 11/12 (DE) | Hammer | Two (Ger) | Lender | (MN-FL) | Storage | Wrench | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | LP | LP | LLC | (DE) LLC | LLC | LP | LLC | Chip LLC | LLC | (DE) LP | LLC | SARL | LLC | (DE) LP | (DE) LP | All Others(d) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investments in real estate (a) |
$ | 1,126,362 | $ | 42,250 | $ | 40,332 | $ | 7,498 | $ | 16,254 | $ | 33,085 | $ | 30,346 | $ | 26,370 | $ | 77,313 | $ | 13,198 | $ | 29,298 | $ | 412,606 | $ | | $ | 106,442 | $ | 231,202 | $ | 33,275 | $ | 26,893 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note receivable |
337,397 | | | | | | | | | | | | 337,397 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets |
75,809 | | 4,214 | | | | | | | | | 28,154 | | | 39,457 | 3,984 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets, net (b) |
91,543 | 312 | 7,056 | 170 | 88 | 660 | 2,392 | 1,386 | 10,869 | 244 | 5,763 | 17,016 | 12,675 | 333 | 23,442 | 7,274 | 1,863 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,631,111 | $ | 42,562 | $ | 51,602 | $ | 7,668 | $ | 16,342 | $ | 33,745 | $ | 32,738 | $ | 27,756 | $ | 88,182 | $ | 13,442 | $ | 35,061 | $ | 457,776 | $ | 350,072 | $ | 106,775 | $ | 294,101 | $ | 44,533 | $ | 28,756 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse debt |
$ | 882,813 | $ | 24,594 | $ | 24,889 | $ | 7,733 | $ | 9,483 | $ | 29,500 | $ | 21,748 | $ | 22,185 | $ | 33,502 | $ | 10,389 | $ | 19,605 | $ | 100,043 | $ | 304,224 | $ | 75,516 | $ | 164,328 | $ | 24,671 | $ | 10,403 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities (c) |
60,677 | 666 | 395 | 139 | 40 | 378 | 1,629 | 1,122 | 10,327 | 341 | 275 | 18,045 | 3,444 | 1,336 | 20,234 | 1,293 | 1,013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
943,490 | 25,260 | 25,284 | 7,872 | 9,523 | 29,878 | 23,377 | 23,307 | 43,829 | 10,730 | 19,880 | 118,088 | 307,668 | 76,852 | 184,562 | 25,964 | 11,416 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling
interest |
337,397 | | | | | | | | | | | 337,397 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Partners/ members equity |
350,224 | 17,302 | 26,318 | (204 | ) | 6,819 | 3,867 | 9,361 | 4,449 | 44,353 | 2,712 | 15,181 | 2,291 | 42,404 | 29,923 | 109,539 | 18,569 | 17,340 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 1,631,111 | $ | 42,562 | $ | 51,602 | $ | 7,668 | $ | 16,342 | $ | 33,745 | $ | 32,738 | $ | 27,756 | $ | 88,182 | $ | 13,442 | $ | 35,061 | $ | 457,776 | $ | 350,072 | $ | 106,775 | $ | 294,101 | $ | 44,533 | $ | 28,756 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HLWG | LT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bos Club | Carey | Comp | CP GAL | Delmo | HLWG | Two | Landlord | UH | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB (Multi) | Bolt (DE) | LL (MA) | BVNY | Norcross | Delaware | Plainfield | Delaware | 11/12 (DE) | Hammer | Two (Ger) | Lender | (MN-FL) | Storage | Wrench | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | LP | LP | LLC | (DE) LLC | LLC | LP | LLC | Chip LLC | LLC | (DE) LP | LLC | SARL | LLC | (DE) LP | (DE) LP | All Others(d) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investments in real estate (a) |
$ | 1,150,575 | $ | 42,043 | $ | 41,319 | $ | 7,645 | $ | 16,119 | $ | 34,023 | $ | 31,059 | $ | 26,975 | $ | 78,551 | $ | 13,669 | $ | 30,040 | $ | 407,079 | $ | | $ | 108,810 | $ | 235,930 | $ | 34,085 | $ | 43,228 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note receivable |
331,841 | | | | | | | | | | | | 331,841 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets |
80,035 | | 4,496 | | | | | | | | | 29,181 | | | 42,108 | 4,250 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets, net (b) |
118,293 | | 6,579 | 179 | 173 | 349 | 3 | 1,566 | 11,079 | 311 | 5,480 | 45,074 | 16,938 | 450 | 22,066 | 6,912 | 1,134 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,680,744 | $ | 42,043 | $ | 52,394 | $ | 7,824 | $ | 16,292 | $ | 34,372 | $ | 31,062 | $ | 28,541 | $ | 89,630 | $ | 13,980 | $ | 35,520 | $ | 481,334 | $ | 348,779 | $ | 109,260 | $ | 300,104 | $ | 45,247 | $ | 44,362 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse debt |
$ | 930,902 | $ | 25,249 | $ | 25,346 | $ | 7,842 | $ | 9,768 | $ | 29,840 | $ | 18,738 | $ | 22,489 | $ | 43,000 | $ | 10,665 | $ | 19,970 | $ | 99,245 | $ | 302,024 | $ | 77,102 | $ | 168,202 | $ | 25,130 | $ | 46,292 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities (c) |
74,700 | 512 | 394 | 161 | 41 | 375 | 370 | 1,125 | 10,120 | 252 | 273 | 34,049 | 3,636 | 1,259 | 19,302 | 1,319 | 1,512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,005,602 | 25,761 | 25,740 | 8,003 | 9,809 | 30,215 | 19,108 | 23,614 | 53,120 | 10,917 | 20,243 | 133,294 | 305,660 | 78,361 | 187,504 | 26,449 | 47,804 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling
interest |
331,841 | | | | | | | | | | | 331,841 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Partners/ members equity |
343,301 | 16,282 | 26,654 | (179 | ) | 6,483 | 4,157 | 11,954 | 4,927 | 36,510 | 3,063 | 15,277 | 16,199 | 43,119 | 30,899 | 112,600 | 18,798 | (3,442 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 1,680,744 | $ | 42,043 | $ | 52,394 | $ | 7,824 | $ | 16,292 | $ | 34,372 | $ | 31,062 | $ | 28,541 | $ | 89,630 | $ | 13,980 | $ | 35,520 | $ | 481,334 | $ | 348,779 | $ | 109,260 | $ | 300,104 | $ | 45,247 | $ | 44,362 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Net investments in real estate consists of net investments in properties and net investments in direct financing leases. | |
(b) | Other assets, net consisted primarily of escrow balances, tenant security deposits held by lenders and restricted cash balances aggregating $50.2 million and $77.9 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively; cash and cash equivalents aggregating $14.6 million and $17.3 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively; deferred rental income aggregating $14.0 million and $12.3 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively; and deferred charges aggregating $5.3 million and $6.0 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Deferred rental income is the cumulative difference for operating leases between scheduled rents that vary during the lease term, and rent recognized on a straight-line basis. Deferred charges are costs incurred in connection with mortgage financings and refinancings that are amortized over the terms of the mortgages and included in Interest expense in the consolidated financial statements. |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 60
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(c) | Other liabilities consists primarily of miscellaneous amounts held on behalf of tenants. | |
(d) | All Others includes unconsolidated ventures that were not significant to the consolidated financial statements. |
The following tables present summarized statement of operations information for our equity
investments in real estate. Amounts provided are the total amounts attributable to the ventures and
do not represent our proportionate share (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HLWG | LT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bos Club | Carey | Comp | CP GAL | Delmo | HLWG | Two | Landlord | UH | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB (Multi) | Bolt (DE) | LL (MA) | BVNY | Norcross | Delaware | Plainfield | Delaware | 11/12 (DE) | Hammer | Two (Ger) | Lender | (MN-FL) | Storage | Wrench | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | LP | LP | LLC | (DE) LLC | LLC | LP | LLC | Chip LLC | LLC | (DE) LP | LLC | SARL | LLC | (DE) LP | (DE) LP | All Others(d) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease revenues (a) |
$ | 129,385 | $ | 4,553 | $ | 5,906 | $ | 1,086 | $ | 2,484 | $ | 4,964 | $ | 5,020 | $ | 3,141 | $ | 11,175 | $ | 3,264 | $ | 3,777 | $ | 35,889 | $ | | $ | 9,272 | $ | 30,589 | $ | 4,809 | $ | 3,456 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income on note
receivable |
27,128 | | | | | | | | | | | | 27,128 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating income |
328 | | | 21 | 1 | 190 | | | | 5 | | 91 | | | 12 | | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
156,841 | 4,553 | 5,906 | 1,107 | 2,485 | 5,154 | 5,020 | 3,141 | 11,175 | 3,269 | 3,777 | 35,980 | 27,128 | 9,272 | 30,601 | 4,809 | 3,464 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(27,432 | ) | | (1,269 | ) | (147 | ) | | (935 | ) | (713 | ) | (605 | ) | (1,238 | ) | (470 | ) | (742 | ) | (10,453 | ) | | (2,368 | ) | (7,379 | ) | (1,075 | ) | (38 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses (b) |
(5,120 | ) | | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | (6 | ) | (17 | ) | (9 | ) | (3 | ) | (22 | ) | (7 | ) | (2 | ) | (4,685 | ) | (79 | ) | (5 | ) | (241 | ) | (19 | ) | (19 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(32,552 | ) | | (1,273 | ) | (149 | ) | (6 | ) | (952 | ) | (722 | ) | (608 | ) | (1,260 | ) | (477 | ) | (744 | ) | (15,138 | ) | (79 | ) | (2,373 | ) | (7,620 | ) | (1,094 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income and (expenses),
net (c) |
(1,020 | ) | | 4 | | | | 1 | | | | 6 | (367 | ) | (708 | ) | 28 | 8 | 8 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(52,472 | ) | (1,952 | ) | (1,494 | ) | (451 | ) | (764 | ) | (1,877 | ) | (1,342 | ) | (1,409 | ) | (1,936 | ) | (858 | ) | (1,172 | ) | (5,301 | ) | (16,170 | ) | (4,513 | ) | (10,861 | ) | (1,474 | ) | (898 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(53,492 | ) | (1,952 | ) | (1,490 | ) | (451 | ) | (764 | ) | (1,877 | ) | (1,341 | ) | (1,409 | ) | (1,936 | ) | (858 | ) | (1,166 | ) | (5,668 | ) | (16,878 | ) | (4,485 | ) | (10,853 | ) | (1,466 | ) | (898 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
70,797 | 2,601 | 3,143 | 507 | 1,715 | 2,325 | 2,957 | 1,124 | 7,979 | 1,934 | 1,867 | 15,174 | 10,171 | 2,414 | 12,128 | 2,249 | 2,509 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to
redeemable noncontrolling
interest |
(23,549 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (23,549 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (Loss) Income Attributable
to Partners/Members |
$ | 47,248 | $ | 2,601 | $ | 3,143 | $ | 507 | $ | 1,715 | $ | 2,325 | $ | 2,957 | $ | 1,124 | $ | 7,979 | $ | 1,934 | $ | 1,867 | $ | (8,375 | ) | $ | 10,171 | $ | 2,414 | $ | 12,128 | $ | 2,249 | $ | 2,509 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 61
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year ended December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HLWG | LT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bos Club | Carey | Comp | CP GAL | Delmo | HLWG | Two | Landlord | UH | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB (Multi) | Bolt (DE) | LL (MA) | BVNY | Norcross | Delaware | Plainfield | Delaware | 11/12 (DE) | Hammer | Two (Ger) | Lender | (MN-FL) | Storage | Wrench | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | LP | LP | LLC | (DE) LLC | LLC | LP | LLC | Chip LLC | LLC | (DE) LP | LLC | SARL | LLC | (DE) LP | (DE) LP | All Others(d) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease revenues (a) |
$ | 131,433 | $ | 4,421 | $ | 5,906 | $ | 1,086 | $ | 2,461 | $ | 4,830 | $ | 4,902 | $ | 3,141 | $ | 11,175 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 3,776 | $ | 37,128 | $ | | $ | 9,272 | $ | 28,541 | $ | 5,016 | $ | 6,778 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income on note
receivable |
28,062 | | | | | | | | | | | | 28,062 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating income |
366 | 86 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 149 | 4 | | | | 113 | | 1 | 5 | | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
159,861 | 4,507 | 5,907 | 1,087 | 2,462 | 4,830 | 5,051 | 3,145 | 11,175 | 3,000 | 3,776 | 37,241 | 28,062 | 9,273 | 28,546 | 5,016 | 6,783 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(27,983 | ) | | (1,269 | ) | (147 | ) | | (935 | ) | (713 | ) | (619 | ) | (1,238 | ) | (470 | ) | (742 | ) | (10,674 | ) | | (2,224 | ) | (7,379 | ) | (1,075 | ) | (498 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses (b) |
(3,510 | ) | (187 | ) | (5 | ) | | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | (86 | ) | | (25 | ) | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (2,748 | ) | (123 | ) | (111 | ) | (135 | ) | (36 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(31,493 | ) | (187 | ) | (1,274 | ) | (147 | ) | (4 | ) | (937 | ) | (799 | ) | (619 | ) | (1,263 | ) | (473 | ) | (746 | ) | (13,422 | ) | (123 | ) | (2,335 | ) | (7,514 | ) | (1,111 | ) | (539 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income and (expenses),
net (c) |
(2,620 | ) | | 42 | | | | | 106 | | 2 | 47 | (349 | ) | (2,649 | ) | 105 | 13 | 61 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(59,568 | ) | (2,003 | ) | (1,524 | ) | (458 | ) | (782 | ) | (1,901 | ) | (1,404 | ) | (1,427 | ) | (4,654 | ) | (880 | ) | (1,196 | ) | (5,549 | ) | (17,244 | ) | (4,688 | ) | (11,137 | ) | (1,505 | ) | (3,216 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(62,188 | ) | (2,003 | ) | (1,482 | ) | (458 | ) | (782 | ) | (1,901 | ) | (1,404 | ) | (1,321 | ) | (4,654 | ) | (878 | ) | (1,149 | ) | (5,898 | ) | (19,893 | ) | (4,583 | ) | (11,124 | ) | (1,444 | ) | (3,214 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
66,180 | 2,317 | 3,151 | 482 | 1,676 | 1,992 | 2,848 | 1,205 | 5,258 | 1,649 | 1,881 | 17,921 | 8,046 | 2,355 | 9,908 | 2,461 | 3,030 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to
redeemable noncontrolling
interest |
(26,775 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (26,775 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (Loss) Income Attributable
to Partners/Members |
$ | 39,405 | $ | 2,317 | $ | 3,151 | $ | 482 | $ | 1,676 | $ | 1,992 | $ | 2,848 | $ | 1,205 | $ | 5,258 | $ | 1,649 | $ | 1,881 | $ | (8,854 | ) | $ | 8,046 | $ | 2,355 | $ | 9,908 | $ | 2,461 | $ | 3,030 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 62
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year ended December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HLWG | LT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bos Club | Carey | Comp | CP GAL | Delmo | HLWG | Two | Landlord | UH | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB (Multi) | Bolt (DE) | LL (MA) | BVNY | Norcross | Delaware | Plainfield | Delaware | 11/12 (DE) | Hammer | Two (Ger) | Lender | (MN-FL) | Storage | Wrench | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | LP | LP | LLC | (DE) LLC | LLC | LP | LLC | Chip LLC | LLC | (DE) LP | LLC | SARL | LLC | (DE) LP | (DE) LP | All Others(d) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease revenues (a) |
$ | 120,777 | $ | 4,484 | $ | 5,840 | $ | 1,086 | $ | 2,442 | $ | 4,711 | $ | 4,549 | $ | 3,030 | $ | 10,451 | $ | 2,735 | $ | 3,737 | $ | 25,536 | $ | | $ | 9,216 | $ | 28,541 | $ | 4,592 | $ | 9,827 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income on note
receivable |
19,336 | | | | | | | | | | | | 19,336 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating income |
138 | | 2 | | | 3 | | | | 1 | 35 | 96 | | | 1 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
140,251 | 4,484 | 5,842 | 1,086 | 2,442 | 4,714 | 4,549 | 3,030 | 10,451 | 2,736 | 3,772 | 25,632 | 19,336 | 9,216 | 28,542 | 4,592 | 9,827 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(24,300 | ) | | (1,269 | ) | (147 | ) | | (935 | ) | (713 | ) | (592 | ) | (1,238 | ) | (470 | ) | (742 | ) | (7,034 | ) | | (1,792 | ) | (7,379 | ) | (1,076 | ) | (913 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses (b) |
(2,213 | ) | (37 | ) | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | (10 | ) | (165 | ) | (3 | ) | (25 | ) | (10 | ) | (4 | ) | (1,444 | ) | (249 | ) | (117 | ) | (83 | ) | (4 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(26,513 | ) | (37 | ) | (1,273 | ) | (150 | ) | (2 | ) | (945 | ) | (878 | ) | (595 | ) | (1,263 | ) | (480 | ) | (746 | ) | (8,478 | ) | (249 | ) | (1,909 | ) | (7,462 | ) | (1,080 | ) | (966 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Income and Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income and (expenses),
net (c) |
15,689 | | 44 | | | | 1 | | | | 69 | 758 | 2,155 | 313 | 25 | 87 | 12,237 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(52,280 | ) | (2,069 | ) | (1,544 | ) | (345 | ) | (798 | ) | (1,899 | ) | (1,440 | ) | (1,336 | ) | (4,854 | ) | (895 | ) | (1,212 | ) | (4,065 | ) | (11,979 | ) | (4,619 | ) | (11,335 | ) | (1,524 | ) | (2,366 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(36,591 | ) | (2,069 | ) | (1,500 | ) | (345 | ) | (798 | ) | (1,899 | ) | (1,439 | ) | (1,336 | ) | (4,854 | ) | (895 | ) | (1,143 | ) | (3,307 | ) | (9,824 | ) | (4,306 | ) | (11,310 | ) | (1,437 | ) | 9,871 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
77,147 | 2,378 | 3,069 | 591 | 1,642 | 1,870 | 2,232 | 1,099 | 4,334 | 1,361 | 1,883 | 13,847 | 9,263 | 3,001 | 9,770 | 2,075 | 18,732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to
redeemable noncontrolling
interest |
(18,346 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (18,346 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Attributable
to Partners/Members |
$ | 58,801 | $ | 2,378 | $ | 3,069 | $ | 591 | $ | 1,642 | $ | 1,870 | $ | 2,232 | $ | 1,099 | $ | 4,334 | $ | 1,361 | $ | 1,883 | $ | (4,499 | ) | $ | 9,263 | $ | 3,001 | $ | 9,770 | $ | 2,075 | $ | 18,732 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Lease revenues consists of rental income and interest income from direct financing leases. | |
(b) | Other operating expenses consists of property expenses, general and administrative expenses and provision for foreign, state and local income taxes. | |
(c) | Other income and (expenses), net consists primarily of other interest income and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments. For the year ended December 31, 2007, All Others included a gain of $12.3 million recognized by a venture in connection with the sale of several properties. The venture had no other assets following the sale. | |
(d) | All Others includes unconsolidated ventures that were not significant to the consolidated financial statements. |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 63
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following tables present summarized cash flow information for certain of our equity investments
in real estate. Amounts provided are the total amounts attributable to the ventures and do not
represent our proportionate share (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bos Club | Carey | Comp | CP GAL | Delmo | HLWG Two | Landlord | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB (Multi) | Bolt (DE) | LL (MA) | BVNY (DE) | Norcross | Delaware | Plainfield | Delaware | 11/12 (DE) | Hammer | HLWG Two | Lender | (MN-FL) | UH Storage | Wrench | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LP | LP | LLC | LLC | LLC | LP | LLC | Chip LLC | LLC | (DE) LP | (Ger) LLC | SARL | LLC | (DE) LP | (DE) LP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 2,308 | $ | 3,942 | $ | 642 | $ | 1,626 | $ | 2,970 | $ | 3,723 | $ | 1,924 | $ | 9,649 | $ | 2,560 | $ | 2,332 | $ | 2,403 | $ | 3,099 | $ | 5,005 | $ | 20,061 | $ | 2,946 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investing activities |
| | | | | | | | | | 27,516 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing activities |
(2,207 | ) | (3,935 | ) | (642 | ) | (1,626 | ) | (2,958 | ) | (3,723 | ) | (1,906 | ) | (9,637 | ) | (2,560 | ) | (2,328 | ) | (31,224 | ) | (6,556 | ) | (4,976 | ) | (19,065 | ) | (2,937 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate
changes on cash |
| | | | | | | | | | 1,518 | (287 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in
cash and cash equivalents |
101 | 7 | | | 12 | | 18 | 12 | | 4 | 213 | (3,744 | ) | 29 | 996 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of year |
3 | 3 | | | 210 | | | 2 | | 4 | 339 | 12,900 | 8 | 3,447 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents,
end of year |
$ | 104 | $ | 10 | $ | | $ | | $ | 222 | $ | | $ | 18 | $ | 14 | $ | | $ | 8 | $ | 552 | $ | 9,156 | $ | 37 | $ | 4,443 | $ | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bos Club | Carey | Comp | CP GAL | Delmo | HLWG Two | Landlord | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB (Multi) | Bolt (DE) | LL (MA) | BVNY (DE) | Norcross | Delaware | Plainfield | Delaware | 11/12 (DE) | Hammer | HLWG Two | Lender | (MN-FL) | UH Storage | Wrench | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LP | LP | LLC | LLC | LLC | LP | LLC | Chip LLC | LLC | (DE) LP | (Ger) LLC | SARL | LLC | (DE) LP | (DE) LP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 2,357 | $ | 3,810 | $ | 590 | $ | 1,602 | $ | 2,953 | $ | 3,947 | $ | 1,386 | $ | 5,845 | $ | 2,194 | $ | 2,242 | $ | (3,615 | ) | $ | 6,470 | $ | 4,606 | $ | 17,266 | $ | 2,834 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investing activities |
| | | | | | | | | | 55,150 | | 440 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing activities |
(2,357 | ) | (3,807 | ) | (590 | ) | (1,602 | ) | (2,745 | ) | (3,947 | ) | (1,386 | ) | (5,845 | ) | (2,194 | ) | (2,241 | ) | (51,562 | ) | (2,472 | ) | (5,068 | ) | (13,822 | ) | (2,834 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate
changes on cash |
| | | | | | | | | | (2,423 | ) | (434 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in
cash and cash equivalents |
| 3 | | | 208 | | | | | 1 | (2,450 | ) | 3,564 | (22 | ) | 3,444 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of year |
3 | | | | 2 | | | 2 | | 3 | 2,789 | 9,336 | 30 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents,
end of year |
$ | 3 | $ | 3 | $ | | $ | | $ | 210 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2 | $ | | $ | 4 | $ | 339 | $ | 12,900 | $ | 8 | $ | 3,447 | $ | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 64
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Year ended December 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bos Club | Carey | Comp | CP GAL | Delmo | HLWG Two | Landlord | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BB (Multi) | Bolt (DE) | LL (MA) | BVNY (DE) | Norcross | Delaware | Plainfield | Delaware | 11/12 (DE) | Hammer | HLWG Two | Lender | (MN-FL) | UH Storage | Wrench | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LP | LP | LLC | LLC | LLC | LP | LLC | Chip LLC | LLC | (DE) LP | (Ger) LLC | SARL | LLC | (DE) LP | (DE) LP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 3,070 | $ | 3,694 | $ | 787 | $ | 1,586 | $ | 2,825 | $ | 3,106 | $ | 2,375 | $ | 5,951 | $ | 1,900 | $ | 2,199 | $ | 1,843 | $ | 8,787 | $ | 4,506 | $ | 17,097 | $ | 2,752 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investing activities |
| | | | | | (2,698 | ) | | | | (502,011 | ) | (314,210 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing activities |
(3,073 | ) | (3,696 | ) | (787 | ) | (1,586 | ) | (2,826 | ) | (3,106 | ) | 323 | (5,952 | ) | (1,900 | ) | (2,198 | ) | 502,684 | 314,157 | (4,476 | ) | (17,094 | ) | (2,751 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate
changes on cash |
| | | | | | | | | | 273 | 602 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in
cash and cash equivalents |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | | 1 | 2,789 | 9,336 | 30 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of year |
6 | 2 | | | 3 | | | 3 | | 2 | | | | | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents,
end of year |
$ | 3 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2 | $ | | $ | 3 | $ | 2,789 | $ | 9,336 | $ | 30 | $ | 3 | $ | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following table presents scheduled debt principal payments during each of the next five
years following December 31, 2009 and thereafter for certain of
our equity investments in real estate (in thousands):
LT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bos Club | Carey | Comp | CP GAL | Delmo | HLWG Two | Landlord | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Years ending | BB (Multi) | Bolt (DE) | LL (MA) | BVNY (DE) | Norcross | Delaware | Plainfield | Delaware | 11/12 (DE) | Hammer | HLWG Two | Lender | (MN-FL) | UH Storage | Wrench | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | LP | LP | LLC | LLC | LLC | LP | LLC | Chip LLC | LLC | (DE) LP | (Ger) LLC | SARL | LLC | (DE) LP | (DE) LP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
$ | 676 | $ | 488 | $ | 115 | $ | 9,483 | $ | 362 | $ | 1,278 | $ | 324 | $ | 1,536 | $ | 297 | $ | 387 | $ | 1,006 | $ | 3,059 | $ | 1,682 | $ | 4,136 | $ | 487 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
729 | 518 | 122 | | 386 | 1,278 | 344 | 1,536 | 10,092 | 410 | 1,257 | 4,207 | 1,782 | 4,415 | 516 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
23,189 | 545 | 128 | | 405 | 1,278 | 366 | 30,430 | | 432 | 1,509 | 4,589 | 1,877 | 4,683 | 544 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
| 23,338 | 136 | | 436 | 1,278 | 390 | | | 18,376 | 1,760 | 5,737 | 2,002 | 5,028 | 23,124 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| | 144 | | 465 | 1,278 | 415 | | | | 2,011 | 6,119 | 2,121 | 146,066 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
| | 7,088 | | 27,446 | 15,358 | 20,346 | | | | 92,500 | 280,513 | 66,052 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 24,594 | $ | 24,889 | $ | 7,733 | $ | 9,483 | $ | 29,500 | $ | 21,748 | $ | 22,185 | $ | 33,502 | $ | 10,389 | $ | 19,605 | $ | 100,043 | $ | 304,224 | $ | 75,516 | $ | 164,328 | $ | 24,671 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We recognized income from equity investments in real estate of $13.8 million, $0.6 million and
$17.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Income from
equity investments in real estate represents our share of the income or losses of these ventures as
well as certain depreciation and amortization adjustments related to purchase accounting and
other-than-temporary impairment charges. In addition, income from equity investments in real estate
during 2009 and 2008 was negatively impacted by impairment charges recognized by us of $0.7 million
and $9.8 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of several ventures to their estimated
fair value (Note 11).
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 65
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7. Intangibles
In connection with our acquisition of properties, we recorded net lease intangibles of $86.4
million, which are being amortized over periods ranging from 9 to 40 years. Amortization of
below-market and above-market rent intangibles is recorded as an adjustment to lease revenues,
while amortization of in-place lease and tenant relationship intangibles is included in
Depreciation and amortization. Below-market rent intangibles are included in Prepaid and deferred
rental income and security deposits in the consolidated financial statements. Intangibles are
summarized as follows (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Lease Intangibles | ||||||||||
In-place lease | $ | 37,533 | $ | 33,420 | ||||||
Tenant relationship | 12,678 | 10,217 | ||||||||
Above-market rent | 42,057 | 42,333 | ||||||||
Less: accumulated amortization | (28,464 | ) | (13,093 | ) | ||||||
$ | 63,804 | $ | 72,877 | |||||||
Below-market rent | $ | (5,855 | ) | $ | (5,365 | ) | ||||
Less: accumulated amortization | 459 | 286 | ||||||||
$ | (5,396 | ) | $ | (5,079 | ) | |||||
Net amortization of intangibles, including the effect of foreign currency translation, was $12.7
million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $6.2 million for each of the years ended December
31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Based on the intangibles recorded at December 31, 2009, scheduled
annual net amortization of intangibles for 2010 is expected to be $6.7 million and $5.8 million for
each of the next four years.
Note 8. Interest in Mortgage Loan Securitization
We account for our subordinated interest in the CCMT mortgage securitization as an
available-for-sale marketable security, which is measured at fair value with all gains and losses
from changes in fair value reported as a component of accumulated OCI as part of equity. Our
interest in CCMT consists of interests in Class IO and Class E certificates. Our interest in the
Class IO certificates, which are rated Aaa by Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and AAA by Fitch,
Inc., had an estimated fair value of $0.8 million and $1.6 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Our interest in the Class E certificates, which are rated between Baa3 and Caa by
Moodys and between BBB- and CCC by Fitch, had an estimated fair value of $11.4 million and $9.8
million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the total fair
value of our interest in CCMT of $12.2 million and $11.4 million, respectively, reflected an
aggregate unrealized gain of $0.8 million and an aggregate unrealized loss of $0.3 million,
respectively, and cumulative net amortization of $1.4 million and $1.1 million,
respectively. We use a discounted cash flow model with assumptions of market credit
spreads and the credit quality of the underlying lessees to determine the fair value of our
interest in CCMT.
One key variable in determining the fair value of the subordinated interest is current interest
rates. The following table presents a sensitivity analysis of the fair value of our interest at
December 31, 2009 based on adverse changes in market interest rates of 1% and 2% (in thousands):
Fair value as of | 1% adverse | 2% adverse | ||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | change | change | ||||||||||
Fair value of our interest in CCMT |
$ | 12,163 | $ | 11,894 | $ | 11,632 |
The above sensitivity analysis is hypothetical, and changes in fair value, based on a 1% or 2%
variation, should not be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the
change in fair value may not always be linear.
In April 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments
for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and
disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities. The new guidance does
not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments
of equity securities. We adopted the new guidance as required in the second quarter of 2009. The
adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on our financial position and results
of operations.
Note 9. Fair Value Measurements
In September 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for using fair value to measure assets
and liabilities, which we adopted as required on January 1, 2008, with the exception of
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value
on a recurring basis, which we adopted as required on January 1, 2009. In April 2009, the FASB
provided additional guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for
the asset or liability have significantly decreased, which we adopted as required in the second
quarter of 2009. Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy based on
the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers are: Level 1, for which quoted market prices
for identical instruments are available in active markets, such as money market funds, equity
securities and U.S. Treasury securities; Level 2, for which there are inputs other than quoted prices included within
Level 1 that are observable for the instrument, such as certain derivative instruments including
interest rate caps and swaps; and Level 3, for which little or no market data exists, therefore
requiring us to develop our own assumptions, such as certain marketable securities.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 66
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables set forth our assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on
a recurring basis at December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Significant Other | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Identical Assets | Observable Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Description | December 31, 2009 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 84,089 | $ | 84,089 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Debt/equity securities |
16,171 | 342 | | 15,829 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
1,494 | | | 1,494 | ||||||||||||
$ | 101,754 | $ | 84,431 | $ | | $ | 17,323 | |||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
$ | (967 | ) | $ | | $ | (967 | ) | $ | | ||||||
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | ||||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Significant Other | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Identical Assets | Observable Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Description | December 31, 2008 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 99,180 | $ | 99,180 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Debt/equity securities |
13,968 | 181 | | 13,787 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
1,601 | | | 1,601 | ||||||||||||
$ | 114,749 | $ | 99,361 | $ | | $ | 15,388 | |||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
$ | (2,256 | ) | $ | | $ | (2,256 | ) | $ | | ||||||
Assets and liabilities presented above exclude financial assets and liabilities owned by
unconsolidated ventures.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 67
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3 Only) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt/Equity | Derivative | Debt/Equity | Derivative | |||||||||||||||||||||
Securities | Assets | Total Assets | Securities | Assets | Total Assets | |||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2009 | Year ended December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 13,787 | $ | 1,601 | $ | 15,388 | $ | 16,408 | $ | 2,564 | $ | 18,972 | ||||||||||||
Total gains or losses (realized and unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings |
1,254 | 98 | 1,352 | (96 | ) | (255 | ) | (351 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
1,037 | | 1,037 | (2,208 | ) | | (2,208 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization and accretion |
(249 | ) | | (249 | ) | (317 | ) | | (317 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
| (205 | ) | (205 | ) | | (708 | ) | (708 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 15,829 | $ | 1,494 | $ | 17,323 | $ | 13,787 | $ | 1,601 | $ | 15,388 | ||||||||||||
The amount of total gains or losses for the period
included in earnings attributable to the change in
unrealized gains or losses relating to assets
still held at the reporting date |
$ | 1,254 | $ | (66 | ) | $ | 1,188 | $ | (96 | ) | $ | (963 | ) | $ | (1,059 | ) | ||||||||
Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings are included in Other income and
(expenses) in the consolidated financial statements.
Our financial instruments had the following carrying value and fair value (in thousands):
December 31, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Non-recourse debt |
$ | 805,663 | $ | 763,456 | $ | 810,794 | $ | 791,337 | ||||||||
Debt/equity securities (a) |
14,139 | 16,171 | 14,208 | 13,968 |
(a) | Carrying value represents historical cost for debt and equity securities. |
We determine the estimated fair value of our debt instruments using a discounted cash flow model
with rates that take into account the credit of the tenants and interest rate risk. We estimate
that our other financial assets and liabilities (excluding net investments in direct financing
leases) had fair values that approximated their carrying values at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
At December 31, 2009, we performed our quarterly assessment of the value of certain of our real
estate investments in accordance with current authoritative accounting guidance. We determined the
valuation of these assets using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash
flow on the expected cash flows of each asset as well as the income capitalization approach, which
considers prevailing market capitalization rates. We reviewed each investment based on the highest
and best use of the investment and market participation assumptions. We determined that the
significant inputs used to value these investments fall within Level 3. Actual results may differ
materially if market conditions or the underlying assumptions change. See Note 11 for a discussion
of impairment charges incurred during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 68
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table presents information about our nonfinancial assets that were measured on a fair
value basis for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. All of the impairment
charges were measured using unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, 2009 | Year ended December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Total Fair Value | Total Impairment | Total Fair Value | Total Impairment | |||||||||||||
Measurements | Charges | Measurements | Charges | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Net investments in properties |
$ | 59,067 | $ | 37,779 | $ | 46,327 | $ | 1,029 | ||||||||
Net investments in direct financing leases |
14,621 | 2,566 | 17,701 | 110 | ||||||||||||
Equity investments in real estate |
11,491 | 671 | 24,940 | 9,820 | ||||||||||||
$ | 85,179 | $ | 41,016 | $ | 88,968 | $ | 10,959 | |||||||||
Note 10. Risk Management and Use of Financial Instruments
Risk Management
In the normal course of our on-going business operations, we encounter economic risk. There are
three main components of economic risk: interest rate risk, credit risk and market risk. We are
subject to interest rate risk on our interest-bearing liabilities. Credit risk is the risk of
default on our operations and tenants inability or unwillingness to make contractually required
payments. Market risk includes changes in the value of our properties and related loans as well as
changes in the value of our marketable equity securities due to changes in interest rates or other
market factors. In addition, we own investments in the European Union and are subject to the risks
associated with changing foreign currency exchange rates.
Foreign Currency Exchange
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate movements, primarily in the Euro. We manage
foreign currency exchange rate movements by generally placing both our debt obligation to the
lender and the tenants rental obligation to us in the same currency, but we are subject to foreign
currency exchange rate movements to the extent of the difference in the timing and amount of the
rental obligation and the debt service. We also face challenges with repatriating cash from our
foreign investments. We may encounter instances where it is difficult to repatriate cash because of
jurisdictional restrictions or because repatriating cash may result in current or future tax
liabilities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings related to foreign
currency transactions are included in Other income and (expenses) in the consolidated financial
statements.
Use of Derivative Financial Instruments
When we use derivative instruments, it is generally to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates. We have not entered, and do not plan to enter into financial instruments for
trading or speculative purposes. In addition to derivative instruments that we entered into on our
own behalf, we may also be a party to derivative instruments that are embedded in other contracts,
and we may own common stock warrants, granted to us by lessees when structuring lease transactions,
that are considered to be derivative instruments. The primary risks related to our use of
derivative instruments are that a counterparty to a hedging arrangement could default on its
obligation or that the credit quality of the counterparty may be downgraded to such an extent that
it impairs our ability to sell or assign our side of the hedging transaction. While we seek to
mitigate these risks by entering into hedging arrangements with counterparties that are large
financial institutions that we deem to be credit worthy, it is possible that our hedging
transactions, which are intended to limit losses, could adversely affect our earnings.
Furthermore, if we terminate a hedging arrangement, we may be obligated to pay certain costs, such
as transaction or breakage fees. We have established policies and procedures for risk assessment
and the approval, reporting and monitoring of derivative financial instrument activities.
In March 2008, the FASB amended the existing guidance for accounting for derivative instruments and
hedging activities to require additional disclosures that are intended to help investors better
understand how derivative instruments and hedging activities affect an entitys financial position,
financial performance and cash flows. The enhanced disclosure requirements primarily surround the
objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments by their underlying risk as well as a
tabular format of the fair values of the derivative instruments and their gains and losses. The
required additional disclosures are presented below.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 69
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table sets forth our derivative instruments at December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in
thousands):
Balance Sheet | Asset Derivatives Fair Value at | Liability Derivatives Fair Value at | ||||||||||||||||||
Location | December 31, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | December 31, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
Other liabilities | $ | | $ | | $ | (967 | ) | $ | (2,256 | ) | |||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock warrants |
Other assets | 1,494 | 1,601 | | | |||||||||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 1,494 | $ | 1,601 | $ | (967 | ) | $ | (2,256 | ) | ||||||||||
The following tables present the impact of derivative instruments on, and their location within,
the consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in | ||||||||||||
OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion) | ||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
$ | 2,037 | $ | (2,256 | ) | $ | | |||||
Total |
$ | 2,037 | $ | (2,256 | ) | $ | | |||||
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, no gains or
losses were reclassified from OCI into income related to effective or
ineffective portions of hedging relationship or to amounts excluded
from effectiveness testing.
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in | ||||||||||||||||
Income on Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not in Cash | Location of Gain (Loss) | Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
Flow Hedging Relationships | Recognized in Income | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||
Stock warrants |
Other income and (expenses) | $ | 98 | $ | (255 | ) | $ | (247 | ) | |||||||
Interest rate swap (a) |
Interest expense | (791 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | (693 | ) | $ | (255 | ) | $ | (247 | ) | |||||||
(a) | During 2009, we determined that an interest rate swap was no longer designated as a hedging instrument due to the sale of the property and the payoff of the underlying mortgage loan in May 2009. As a result, the change in fair value of the swap was recorded in interest expense. |
See below for information on our purposes for entering into derivative instruments, including those
not designated as hedging instruments, and for information on derivative instruments owned by
unconsolidated ventures, which are excluded from the tables above.
Interest Rate Swaps
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowing activities.
To limit this exposure, we attempt to obtain mortgage financing on a long-term, fixed-rate basis.
However, from time to time, we or our venture partners may obtain variable rate non-recourse
mortgage loans and, as a result, may enter into interest rate swap agreements with counterparties.
Interest rate swaps, which effectively convert the variable rate debt service obligations of the
loan to a fixed rate, are agreements in which one party exchanges a stream of interest payments for a counterpartys stream of cash flow over a
specific period. The notional, or face, amount on which the swaps are based is not exchanged. Our
objective in using these derivatives is to limit our exposure to interest rate movements.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 70
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The interest rate swap derivative instruments that we had outstanding at December 31, 2009 were
designated as cash flow hedges and are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
Notional | Effective | Effective | Expiration | Fair Value at | ||||||||||||||||||||
Type | Amount | Interest Rate | Date | Date | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
1-Month LIBOR |
Pay-fixed swap | $ | 12,076 | 5.6 | % | 3/2008 | 3/2018 | $ | (524 | ) | ||||||||||||||
1-Month LIBOR |
Pay-fixed swap | 6,304 | 6.4 | % | 7/2008 | 7/2018 | (443 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
$ | (967 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Embedded Credit Derivative
In connection with a German transaction in 2007, two unconsolidated ventures in which we have a
total effective ownership interest of 32% obtained non-recourse mortgage financing for which the
interest rate has both fixed and variable components. The lender of this financing entered into
interest rate swap agreements on its own behalf through which the fixed interest rate components on
the financing were converted into variable interest rate instruments. The ventures have the right,
at their sole discretion, to prepay the debt at any time and to participate in any realized gain or
loss on the interest rate swaps at that time. These participation rights are deemed to be embedded
credit derivatives. Based on valuations obtained at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and including the
effect of foreign currency translation, the embedded credit derivatives had an estimated total fair
value of $1.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively. For 2009 and 2008, these derivatives
generated total unrealized losses of $1.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively. Amounts provided
are the total amounts attributable to the venture and do not represent our proportionate share.
Changes in the fair value of the embedded credit derivatives are recognized in the ventures
earnings.
Stock Warrants
We own stock warrants that were generally granted to us by lessees in connection with structuring
the initial lease transactions. These warrants are defined as derivative instruments because they
are readily convertible to cash or provide for net settlement upon conversion.
Included in Other income and (expenses) in the consolidated financial statements are unrealized
losses on common stock warrants of $0.1 million, $1.0 million and $1.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The unrealized losses for 2008 include the reversal
of unrealized gains totaling $0.7 million recognized in prior years. We reversed these unrealized
gains in connection with a tenants merger transaction during 2008, prior to which it redeemed its
outstanding warrants, including ours. In connection with the sale of securities related to this
warrant exercise, we received cash proceeds of $0.9 million and realized a gain of $0.9 million,
which is included in Other income and (expenses) in the consolidated financial statements. The
unrealized losses for 2007 primarily represent the reversal of unrealized gains recognized in 2006,
including an out-of-period adjustment of $1.0 million (Note 2). We reversed these unrealized gains
in connection with a tenants merger transaction during 2007, prior to which it redeemed its
outstanding warrants, including ours. In connection with the sale of securities related to this
warrant exercise, we received cash proceeds of $2.2 million, net of a $1.0 million exercise price,
and realized a gain of $1.6 million.
Other
Amounts reported in OCI related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest
payments are made on our non-recourse variable-rate debt. At December 31, 2009, we estimate that an
additional $0.6 million will be reclassified as interest expense during the next twelve months.
We have agreements with certain of our derivative counterparties that contain certain credit
contingent provisions that could result in a declaration of default against us regarding our
derivative obligations if we either default or are capable of being declared in default on any of
our indebtedness. At December 31, 2009, we have not been declared in default on any of our
derivative obligations. The estimated fair value of our derivatives that were in a net liability
position was $1.0 million at December 31, 2009, which includes accrued interest but excludes any
adjustment for nonperformance risk. If we had breached any of these provisions at December 31,
2009, we could have been required to settle our obligations under these agreements at their
termination value of $1.1 million.
Portfolio Concentration Risk
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a group of tenants is engaged in similar business
activities or is subject to similar economic risks or conditions that could cause them to default
on their lease obligations to us. We regularly monitor our portfolio to assess potential
concentrations of credit risk. While we believe our portfolio is reasonably well diversified, it
does contain concentrations in excess of 10% of current annualized lease revenues in certain areas,
as described below. Although we view our exposure from properties that we purchased together with
our affiliates based on our ownership percentage in these properties, the percentages below are
based on our consolidated ownership and not on our actual ownership percentage in these
investments.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 71
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
At December 31, 2009, the majority of our directly owned real estate properties were located in the
U.S. (83%) with the remainder primarily leased to one tenant located in France, Carrefour France,
SAS (14%). No other tenant accounted for more than 10% of current annualized lease revenue. At
December 31, 2009, our directly owned real estate properties contained concentrations in the
following asset types: industrial (32%), warehouse/distribution (30%), office (19%) and retail
(10%); and in the following tenant industries: retail (27%), electronics (12%) and automotive
(11%).
Many companies in automotive related industries (manufacturing, parts, services, etc.) have been
experiencing increasing difficulties for several years, which has resulted in several companies
filing for bankruptcy. At December 31, 2009, we had five tenants in automotive related industries,
including Special Devices and Metaldyne Company, which emerged from bankruptcy in August 2009 and
December 2009, respectively. These five tenants accounted for aggregate lease revenues totaling
$15.3 million, $16.4 million and $17.0 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, with an
aggregate carrying value of $99.0 million and $105.3 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. In August 2009, we entered into two new leases with Special Devices, Inc. upon its
emergence from bankruptcy. One lease converted to a month-to-month lease at an annual rent of $0.5
million upon its expiration in January 2010, while the second lease is scheduled to expire in June
2021 and will generate annual lease revenues of $1.0 million. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, Special
Devices accounted for lease revenues of $1.5 million, $4.2 million and $4.0 million, respectively,
with an aggregate carrying value of $25.0 million and $25.7 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. In addition, in December 2009, we entered into an agreement with Metaldyne whereby
Metaldyne vacated four of the five properties it leased from us and entered into a new, five-year
lease with us at the fifth property. We entered into direct leases with existing subtenants at two
of the four vacated properties, and the remaining two properties remain vacant at the date of this
Report. The leased properties are expected to generate annual lease revenues of $0.9 million
following the settlement. During 2009, 2008 and 2007, Metaldyne accounted for lease revenues of
$5.2 million, $3.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively, with an aggregate carrying value of
$20.0 million and $24.6 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
During 2009, five non-automotive tenants vacated their properties or rejected their leases with us
in connection with bankruptcy proceedings. These five leases accounted for $9.9 million, $12.2
million and $12.8 million of annual lease revenues for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, with an
aggregate carrying value of $50.4 million and $86.3 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. During the time that these properties remain unoccupied, we anticipate that we will
incur significant carrying costs. As a result of these corporate defaults, during 2009 we suspended
debt service on three related non-recourse mortgage loans, which had an aggregate outstanding
balance of $54.1 million at December 31, 2009.
Note 11. Impairment Charges
The following table summarizes impairment charges recognized on our consolidated and unconsolidated
real estate investments during 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Net investments in properties (a) |
$ | 37,779 | $ | 1,029 | $ | | ||||||
Net investment in direct financing lease |
2,566 | 110 | 345 | |||||||||
Total impairment charges included in expenses |
40,345 | 1,139 | 345 | |||||||||
Equity investments in real estate (b) |
671 | 9,820 | | |||||||||
Total impairment charges |
$ | 41,016 | $ | 10,959 | $ | 345 | ||||||
(a) | Impairment charges on our equity investments are included in Income from equity investments in real estate in our consolidated statements of operations. |
Impairment charges recognized during 2009 were as follows:
Nortel Networks Inc.
During 2009, we incurred impairment charges totaling $22.2 million on a property previously leased
to Nortel Networks Inc. to reduce its carrying value to its estimated fair value based on a
discounted cash flow analysis. Nortel Networks filed for bankruptcy and disaffirmed its lease with
us in the first quarter of 2009. During the second quarter of 2009, we entered into a direct lease
with the existing subtenant at the former Nortel Networks property; however, the new tenant has
defaulted on its rental obligation. In March 2010, we turned over the property to the lender in
exchange for the lenders agreement to relieve of us of all mortgage obligations.
We expect that we will recognize a gain on the disposition of this
property, as the carrying value of the debt, $27.6 million, exceeds
the propertys $17.0 million carrying value.
At December 31,
2009, this property was classified as Net investment in properties in the consolidated financial
statements.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 72
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Buffets, Inc.
During 2009, we recognized an impairment charge of $8.1 million on a domestic property leased to
Buffets, Inc. to reduce its carrying value to its estimated fair value based on third party broker
quotes. Buffets filed for bankruptcy in January 2008, subsequently emerged from bankruptcy in April
2009 and vacated the property during the fourth quarter of 2009. We calculated the estimated fair
value of this property based on an appraisal conducted in the course of the annual third party
valuation of our real estate and using third party broker quotes. At December 31, 2009, this
property was classified as Net investment in properties in the consolidated financial statements.
Metaldyne Company
During 2009, we recognized an impairment charge of $4.0 million on a property leased to Metaldyne
Company to reduce its carrying value to its estimated fair value based on third party broker
quotes. Metaldyne is operating under bankruptcy protection and its lease expires in April 2010.
At December 31, 2009, this property was classified as Net investment in properties in the consolidated
financial statements.
Nexpak Corporation
During 2009, we recognized an impairment charge of $3.5 million on a domestic property previously
leased to Nexpak Corporation to reduce its carrying value to its estimated fair value based on
third party broker quotes. Nexpak filed for bankruptcy in April 2009, terminated its lease in
bankruptcy court and vacated the property. At December 31, 2009, this property was classified as Net
investment in properties in the consolidated financial statements.
The Upper Deck Company
We recognized other-than-temporary impairment charges of $0.7 million and $1.1 million during 2009
and 2008, respectively, to reflect declines in the estimated fair value of the ventures underlying
net assets in comparison with the carrying value of our interest in the venture. This venture is
classified as an Equity investment in real estate in the consolidated financial statements.
Other
We
perform an annual valuation of our assets that is based in part on third party appraisals. In
connection with this valuation, during 2009, we recognized impairment charges totaling $2.6 million
on several net investments in direct financing leases as a result of declines in the current
estimate of the residual value of the properties.
Impairment charges recognized during 2008 were as follows:
During 2008, we recognized an impairment charge of $1.0 million on a domestic property to reduce
the propertys carrying value to its estimated fair value. In addition, we recognized an impairment
charge of $0.1 million on several domestic properties as a result of a decline in the unguaranteed
residual value of the properties.
In addition to the other-than-temporary impairment charges of $1.1 million described above in Upper
Deck, we recognized impairment charges totaling $8.7 million related to two equity investments in
real estate to reduce the carrying values to the estimated fair value of the ventures underlying
net assets.
Impairment charges recognized during 2007 were as follows:
We recognized an impairment charge of $0.3 million in connection with the sale of properties leased
to a former tenant to reduce the
properties carrying value to their estimated fair value.
Note 12. Debt
Non-recourse debt consists of mortgage notes payable, which are collateralized by an assignment of
real property and direct financing leases with an aggregate carrying value of $1.1 billion at
December 31, 2009. Our mortgage notes payable bore interest at fixed annual rates ranging from 5.5%
to 8.7% and variable annual rates ranging from 5.2% to 6.5%, with maturity dates ranging from 2010
to 2023 at December 31, 2009.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 73
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Scheduled debt principal payments during each of the next five years following December 31, 2009
and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
Years ending December 31, | Total Debt | |||
2010 |
$ | 86,262 | ||
2011 |
272,018 | |||
2012 |
162,583 | |||
2013 |
10,849 | |||
2014 |
26,428 | |||
Thereafter through 2023 |
247,523 | |||
Total |
$ | 805,663 | ||
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 74
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financing Activity
2009 We refinanced maturing non-recourse mortgage loans with new non-recourse financing of $27.8
million at a weighted average annual interest rate and term of up to 6.7% and 9.8 years,
respectively.
2008 We refinanced maturing non-recourse mortgage loans with new non-recourse financing of $9.7
million at a weighted average annual interest rate and term of up to 6.1% and 8.7 years,
respectively.
Credit Facility
In May 2008, we terminated our $150.0 million credit facility and wrote off unamortized deferred
financing costs totaling $0.2 million. No amounts were outstanding on the credit facility at
December 31, 2007 or during 2008 through the date of termination.
Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies
Various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business are pending against us. The
results of these proceedings are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
Note 14. Advisor Settlement of SEC Investigation
In March 2008, WPC and Carey Financial entered into a settlement with the SEC with respect to all
matters relating to a previously disclosed investigation. In connection with this settlement, WPC
paid us $10.9 million.
Note 15. Equity
Distributions
Distributions paid to shareholders consist of ordinary income, capital gains, return of capital or
a combination thereof for income tax purposes. The following table presents distributions per share
reported for tax purposes:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Ordinary income |
$ | 0.59 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||
Return of capital |
0.11 | | | |||||||||
Capital gains |
0.09 | 0.07 | 0.25 | |||||||||
0.79 | 0.76 | 0.68 | ||||||||||
Spillover distribution (a) |
| 0.02 | 0.10 | |||||||||
$ | 0.79 | $ | 0.78 | $ | 0.78 | |||||||
(a) | For 2008 and 2007, this portion of the distribution was paid to shareholders in 2009 and 2008 as ordinary income ($0.02 and $0.06, respectively) and long term capital gain ($0.04 for 2007), however taxed in the year the distribution was declared. |
We declared a quarterly distribution of $0.1991 per share in December 2009, which was paid in
January 2010 to shareholders of record at December 31, 2009.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following table presents accumulated OCI in equity. Amounts include our proportionate share of
other comprehensive income or loss from our unconsolidated investments (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
$ | (67 | ) | $ | (1,229 | ) | ||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
170 | (2,256 | ) | |||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
8,735 | 7,912 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
$ | 8,838 | $ | 4,427 | ||||
CPA®:14
2009 10-K 75
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 16. Income Taxes
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code. We believe we
have operated, and we intend to continue to operate, in a manner that allows us to continue to
qualify as a REIT. Under the REIT operating structure, we are permitted to deduct distributions
paid to our shareholders and generally will not be required to pay U.S. federal income taxes.
Accordingly, no provision has been made for U.S. federal income taxes in the consolidated financial
statements.
We conduct business in various states and municipalities within the U.S. and the European Union
and, as a result, we file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and
certain foreign jurisdictions. The tax provision for 2007 included $0.4 million in income tax
expenses related to the years ended December 31, 2003 2006 that had not previously been accrued
(Note 2).
We account for uncertain tax positions in accordance with current authoritative accounting
guidance. The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Balance at January 1, |
$ | 110 | $ | 106 | ||||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
22 | 15 | ||||||
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
| | ||||||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
| | ||||||
Settlements |
| | ||||||
Reductions for expiration of statute of limitations |
(11 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Balance at December 31, |
$ | 121 | $ | 110 | ||||
At December 31, 2009, we had unrecognized tax benefits as presented in the table above that, if
recognized, would have a favorable impact on the effective income tax rate in future periods. We
recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. At both
December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had less than $0.1 million of accrued interest related to uncertain
tax positions.
Our tax returns are subject to audit by taxing authorities. Such audits can often take years to
complete and settle. The tax years 2003-2009 remain open to examination by the major taxing
jurisdictions to which we are subject.
Note 17. Discontinued Operations
From time to time, tenants may vacate space due to lease buy-outs, elections not to renew their
leases, company insolvencies or lease rejections in the bankruptcy process. In these cases, we
assess whether we can obtain the highest value from the property by re-leasing or selling it. In
addition, in certain cases, we may elect to sell a property that is occupied if selling the
property yields the highest value. When it is appropriate to do so under current accounting
guidance for the disposal of long-lived assets, we reclassify the property as an asset held for
sale and the current and prior period results of operations of the property are reclassified as
discontinued operations.
2009 We sold two properties for a total of $26.2 million, net of selling costs, and recognized a
net gain on these sales of $8.6 million. Concurrent with the closing of one of these sales, we used
a portion of the sale proceeds to defease non-recourse mortgage debt totaling $15.0 million on two
unrelated domestic properties and incurred defeasance charges totaling $0.4 million. We then
substituted the then-unencumbered properties as collateral for the existing $12.2 million loan. The
terms of the existing loan remain unchanged. In connection with the second sale, we defeased the
existing non-recourse mortgage loan of $2.7 million.
2008 We sold two properties for a total of $14.9 million, net of selling costs, and recognized a
net gain on these sales of $0.5 million. In connection with the sale of one of these properties, we
prepaid the existing non-recourse mortgage loan of $6.5 million and incurred prepayment penalties
of $0.3 million.
2007 We sold a property for $35.7 million, net of selling costs and recognized a net gain on the
sale of $7.8 million. In connection with the sale, we defeased the existing non-recourse mortgage
loans on the property of $12.1 million and incurred defeasance charges of $0.9 million.
CPA®:14
2009 10-K 76
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The results of operations for properties that are held for sale or have been sold are reflected in
the consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations for all periods presented and are
summarized as follows (in thousands):
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 1,903 | $ | 4,926 | $ | 7,250 | ||||||
Expenses |
(622 | ) | (2,458 | ) | (5,055 | ) | ||||||
Gain on sale of real estate, net |
8,611 | 524 | 7,780 | |||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | 9,892 | $ | 2,992 | $ | 9,975 | ||||||
Note 18. Segment Information
We have determined that we operate in one business segment, real estate ownership with domestic and
foreign investments. Geographic information for this segment is as follows (in thousands):
2009 | Domestic | Foreign(a) | Total Company | |||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 138,131 | $ | 31,854 | $ | 169,985 | ||||||
Total long-lived assets (b) |
1,101,460 | 209,011 | 1,310,471 |
2008 | Domestic | Foreign(a) | Total Company | |||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 132,494 | $ | 30,981 | $ | 163,475 | ||||||
Total long-lived assets (b) |
1,144,992 | 223,119 | 1,368,111 |
2007 | Domestic | Foreign(a) | Total Company | |||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 133,960 | $ | 26,586 | $ | 160,546 | ||||||
Total long-lived assets (b) |
1,189,988 | 243,326 | 1,433,314 |
(a) | Consists of operations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland, the Netherlands and Germany. | |
(b) | Consists of real estate, net; net investment in direct financing leases and equity investments in real estate. |
Note 19. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2009 | June 30, 2009 | September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues (a) |
$ | 38,898 | $ | 41,431 | $ | 44,468 | $ | 45,188 | ||||||||
Operating expenses (a) |
(21,582 | ) | (19,017 | ) | (43,957 | ) | (40,506 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) (b) |
6,622 | 19,212 | (12,039 | ) | (6,794 | ) | ||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
(638 | ) | (628 | ) | (94 | ) | (325 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to
CPA®:14 shareholders |
5,984 | 18,584 | (12,133 | ) | (7,119 | ) | ||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to
CPA®:14 shareholders |
0.07 | 0.21 | (0.14 | ) | (0.08 | ) | ||||||||||
Distributions declared per share |
0.1976 | 0.1981 | 0.1986 | 0.1991 |
CPA®:14
2009 10-K 77
Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2008 | June 30, 2008 | September 30, 2008 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||
Revenues (a) |
$ | 40,165 | $ | 40,930 | $ | 39,545 | $ | 42,835 | ||||||||
Operating expenses (a) |
(18,453 | ) | (19,146 | ) | (17,144 | ) | (19,791 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (b) |
22,626 | 10,602 | 10,189 | 3,784 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
(439 | ) | (378 | ) | (576 | ) | (644 | ) | ||||||||
Net income attributable to CPA®:14
shareholders |
22,187 | 10,224 | 9,613 | 3,140 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share attributable to CPA®:14
shareholders |
0.25 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||
Distributions declared per share |
0.1954 | 0.1959 | 0.1964 | 0.1971 |
(a) | Certain amounts from previous quarters have been retrospectively adjusted as discontinued operations (Note 17). | |
(b) | Net income for the fourth quarter of 2009 and 2008 included impairment charges totaling $20.1 million and $9.8 million, respectively, in connection with several properties and equity investments in real estate (Note 11). |
CPA®:14
2009 10-K 78
Table of Contents
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE and ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
at December 31, 2009
(in thousands)
at December 31, 2009
(in thousands)
Life on which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation in | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in Latest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs Capitalized | Increase | Gross Amount at which Carried | Statement of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost to Company | Subsequent to | (Decrease) in Net | at Close of Period | Accumulated | Date | Income is | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings | Acquisition (a) | Investments (b) | Land | Buildings | Total | Depreciation (c) | Acquired | Computed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate Under Operating Leases: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail store in Torrance, California |
$ | 27,984 | $ | 13,060 | $ | 6,934 | $ | 204 | $ | | $ | 13,060 | $ | 7,138 | $ | 20,198 | $ | 2,010 | Jul. 1998 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in San Clemente, California |
| 2,390 | | 8,958 | 53 | 2,390 | 9,011 | 11,401 | 2,304 | Jul. 1998 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania |
5,851 | 620 | 6,186 | | | 620 | 6,186 | 6,806 | 1,708 | Dec. 1998 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial and warehouse facilities in Burbank, California and Las
Vegas, Nevada |
6,850 | 3,860 | 8,263 | | 2 | 3,860 | 8,265 | 12,125 | 2,200 | Mar. 1999, Oct. 1999 |
40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facilities in Harrisburg, North
Carolina; Atlanta, Georgia; Cincinnati, Ohio and Elkwood, Virginia |
12,156 | 3,930 | 10,398 | 8,476 | 9 | 3,945 | 18,868 | 22,813 | 4,189 | Jun. 1999, Dec. 2001 |
40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facilities in Burlington, New Jersey;
Shawnee, Kansas and Manassas, Virginia |
20,533 | 3,604 | 8,613 | 23,709 | | 4,476 | 31,450 | 35,926 | 8,036 | Aug. 1999 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land in Midlothian, Virginia |
2,478 | 3,515 | | | | 3,515 | | 3,515 | | Sep. 1999 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office facility in Columbia, Maryland |
12,291 | 2,623 | 20,233 | 3,113 | | 2,623 | 23,346 | 25,969 | 5,782 | Nov. 1999 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facilities in Welcome, North Carolina, Murrysville,
Pennsylvania and Wylie, Texas |
12,738 | 1,596 | 23,910 | 875 | (214 | ) | 2,059 | 24,108 | 26,167 | 5,102 | Nov. 1999, Dec. 2001 |
40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sports facilities in Salt Lake City, Utah and St. Charles, Missouri |
6,353 | 2,920 | 8,660 | 836 | | 2,920 | 9,496 | 12,416 | 2,192 | Dec. 1999, Dec. 2000 |
40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facility in Tempe, Arizona |
3,035 | 940 | 4,557 | 13 | | 940 | 4,570 | 5,510 | 1,119 | Jan. 2000 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facility in Rock Island, Illinois |
6,540 | 500 | 9,945 | 1,887 | | 500 | 11,832 | 12,332 | 2,687 | Feb. 2000 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in North Amityville, New York |
9,503 | 2,932 | 16,398 | 18 | (4,120 | ) | 1,482 | 13,746 | 15,228 | 3,394 | Feb. 2000 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facilities in Monon, Indiana; Champlin,
Minnesota; Robbinsville, New Jersey; Radford, Virginia and North
Salt Lake City, Utah |
14,907 | 4,580 | 24,844 | 114 | | 4,580 | 24,958 | 29,538 | 5,990 | May. 2000 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facility in Lakewood, New Jersey |
6,091 | 710 | 4,531 | 3,439 | | 710 | 7,970 | 8,680 | 1,817 | Jun. 2000 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail facilities in Kennesaw, Georgia and Leawood, Kansas |
13,433 | 6,230 | 15,842 | 108 | (357 | ) | 6,230 | 15,593 | 21,823 | 3,720 | Jun. 2000 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land in Scottsdale, Arizona |
7,664 | 14,600 | | | | 14,600 | | 14,600 | | Sep. 2000 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Albuquerque, New Mexico |
3,176 | 1,490 | 4,636 | 7 | | 1,490 | 4,643 | 6,133 | 1,078 | Sep. 2000 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office facility in Houston, Texas |
4,535 | 570 | 6,760 | | | 570 | 6,760 | 7,330 | 1,570 | Sep. 2000 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office facility in Eagan, Minnesota |
19,363 | 4,225 | 15,518 | 1 | (9,425 | ) | 1,314 | 9,005 | 10,319 | 3,605 | Sep. 2000 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facilities in Valdosta, Georgia and
Johnson City, Tennessee |
11,314 | 650 | 16,889 | 410 | | 650 | 17,299 | 17,949 | 3,983 | Oct. 2000 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land in Elk Grove Village, Illinois |
2,854 | 4,100 | | | | 4,100 | | 4,100 | | Oct. 2000 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Salisbury, North Carolina |
6,356 | 1,370 | 2,672 | 6,298 | (51 | ) | 1,319 | 8,970 | 10,289 | 1,803 | Nov. 2000 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office facility in Lafayette, Louisiana |
2,198 | 660 | 3,005 | | | 660 | 3,005 | 3,665 | 679 | Dec. 2000 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office facility in Collierville, Tennessee |
39,936 | 3,154 | 70,646 | 12 | | 3,154 | 70,658 | 73,812 | 27,922 | Dec. 2000 | 7-40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multiplex motion picture theater in Port St. Lucie and Pensacola,
Florida |
8,434 | 3,200 | 3,066 | 6,800 | (4,112 | ) | 3,685 | 5,269 | 8,954 | 1,122 | Dec. 2000 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail, warehouse and distribution facilities in York, Pennsylvania |
9,456 | 1,974 | 10,068 | 8,433 | (5,456 | ) | 849 | 14,170 | 15,019 | 1,758 | Dec. 2000 | 40 yrs. |
CPA®:14
2009 10-K 79
Table of Contents
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
at December 31, 2009
(in thousands)
at December 31, 2009
(in thousands)
Life on which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in Latest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs Capitalized | Increase | Gross Amount at which Carried | Statement of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost to Company | Subsequent to | (Decrease) in Net | at Close of Period | Accumulated | Date | Income is | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings | Acquisition (a) | Investments (b) | Land | Buildings | Total | Depreciation (c) | Acquired | Computed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate Under Operating Leases (Continued): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office facilities in Lindon, Utah |
| 1,390 | 1,123 | 8,081 | (428 | ) | 1,851 | 8,315 | 10,166 | 2,497 | Dec. 2000 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office facility in Houston, Texas |
3,533 | 1,025 | 4,530 | 517 | | 1,025 | 5,047 | 6,072 | 1,066 | Dec. 2000 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Doncaster, United Kingdom |
5,341 | | 8,383 | 7 | 2,415 | | 10,805 | 10,805 | 417 | Jan. 2001 | 21.7 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial and office facilities in Elgin, Illinois; Bozeman,
Montana and Nashville, Tennessee |
10,910 | 3,900 | 17,937 | 138 | (546 | ) | 3,900 | 17,529 | 21,429 | 3,849 | Mar. 2001 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facility in Duluth, Georgia |
7,152 | 2,167 | 11,446 | 5 | (3,500 | ) | 1,484 | 8,634 | 10,118 | 2,517 | Mar. 2001 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facilities in City of Industry, California; Florence,
Kentucky; Chelmsford, Massachusetts and Lancaster, Texas |
9,599 | 4,398 | 13,418 | 3,745 | 24 | 4,643 | 16,942 | 21,585 | 3,500 | Apr. 2001 | 7-40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facilities in Mesa, Arizona and Moorpark, California |
17,504 | 4,000 | 14,951 | 10,146 | | 5,945 | 23,152 | 29,097 | 4,109 | Jun. 2001, Dec. 2006 |
34.5 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facilities in South Windsor and Manchester, Connecticut |
11,449 | 1,555 | 18,823 | 250 | 27 | 1,555 | 19,100 | 20,655 | 4,028 | Jul. 2001 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial and office facilities in Rome, Georgia; Niles,
Illinois; Plymouth, Michigan and Twinsburg, Ohio |
15,163 | 4,140 | 23,822 | 1,373 | (4,027 | ) | 3,789 | 21,519 | 25,308 | 5,329 | Aug. 2001 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Milford, Ohio |
9,092 | 2,000 | 12,869 | | | 2,000 | 12,869 | 14,869 | 2,668 | Sep. 2001 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail facilities in several cities in the following states: Arizona,
California, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland,
Michigan, Minnesota and Texas |
39,576 | 17,100 | 54,743 | | | 17,100 | 54,743 | 71,843 | 11,120 | Nov. 2001 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office facility in Richardson, Texas |
27,554 | 3,400 | 45,054 | 66 | (22,652 | ) | 1,481 | 24,387 | 25,868 | 8,839 | Dec. 2001 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office facility in Turku, Finland |
47,737 | 801 | 23,390 | 12,291 | 14,364 | 1,813 | 49,033 | 50,846 | 8,486 | Dec. 2001, Dec. 2007 |
25-40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Educational facilities in Union, New Jersey; Allentown and
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Grand Prairie, Texas |
5,394 | 2,486 | 7,602 | | 3 | 2,486 | 7,605 | 10,091 | 1,529 | Dec. 2001 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse, distribution, office and industrial facilities in
Perris, California; Eugene, Oregon; West Jordan, Utah and Tacoma,
Washington |
6,301 | 6,050 | 8,198 | | (1,845 | ) | 4,200 | 8,203 | 12,403 | 1,615 | Feb. 2002 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facilities in Charlotte and
Lincolnton, North Carolina and Mauldin, South Carolina |
8,127 | 1,860 | 12,852 | | 1 | 1,860 | 12,853 | 14,713 | 2,505 | Mar. 2002 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facilities in Boe, Carpiquet, Mans,
Vendin Le Vieil, Lieusaint, Lagnieu, Luneville and St. Germain de
Puy, France |
92,700 | 15,724 | 75,211 | 13,755 | 53,349 | 26,677 | 131,362 | 158,039 | 25,025 | Mar. 2002 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse, distribution and office facilities in Davenport, Iowa
and Bloomington, Minnesota |
17,444 | 3,260 | 26,009 | | | 3,260 | 26,009 | 29,269 | 4,850 | Jul. 2002 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Gorinchem, Netherlands |
6,612 | 2,374 | 3,864 | | 2,673 | 3,440 | 5,471 | 8,911 | 1,025 | Jul. 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facilities in Granite City, Illinois; Kendallville,
Indiana and Clinton Township, Michigan |
18,453 | 4,390 | 30,336 | | (1,022 | ) | 4,390 | 29,314 | 33,704 | 5,809 | Aug. 2002 | 40 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail facilities in Lombard, Illinois and Fairfax, Virginia |
12,076 | 13,226 | 18,248 | | (1,018 | ) | 13,226 | 17,230 | 30,456 | 1,582 | Dec. 2006 | 33.6 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail facility in South Tulsa, Oklahoma |
4,701 | 1,649 | 3,425 | | | 1,649 | 3,425 | 5,074 | 352 | Dec. 2006 | 30 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail and warehouse and distribution facilities in Johnstown and
Whitehall, Pennsylvania |
4,153 | 2,115 | 15,945 | | (609 | ) | 2,115 | 15,336 | 17,451 | 1,560 | Dec. 2006 | 30.3 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facility in Dallas, Texas |
3,504 | 323 | 6,784 | | | 323 | 6,784 | 7,107 | 597 | Dec. 2006 | 30.8 yrs. |
CPA®:14
2009 10-K 80
Table of Contents
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
at December 31, 2009
(in thousands)
at December 31, 2009
(in thousands)
Life on which | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in Latest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs Capitalized | Increase | Gross Amount at which Carried | Statement of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost to Company | Subsequent to | (Decrease) in Net | at Close of Period | Accumulated | Date | Income is | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings | Acquisition (a) | Investments (b) | Land | Buildings | Total | Depreciation (c) | Acquired | Computed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate Under Operating Leases (Continued): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Shelburne, Vermont |
1,876 | 955 | 2,919 | | | 955 | 2,919 | 3,874 | 294 | Dec. 2006 | 30.6 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facilities in Fort Dodge, Indiana and Oconomowoc,
Wisconsin |
6,267 | 1,218 | 11,879 | 2,514 | | 1,218 | 14,393 | 15,611 | 1,638 | Dec. 2006 | 23.5 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Aurora, Illinois |
8,786 | 2,730 | 10,391 | | | 2,730 | 10,391 | 13,121 | 1,039 | Dec. 2006 | 30.8 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Houston, Texas |
| 2,299 | 4,722 | | | 2,299 | 4,722 | 7,021 | 892 | Dec. 2006 | 16.3 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial, warehouse and distribution and office facilities in
Waterloo, Wisconsin |
| 922 | 16,824 | | (642 | ) | 922 | 16,182 | 17,104 | 2,454 | Dec. 2006 | 20.3 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial and warehouse and distribution facilities in Westfield,
Massachusetts |
6,457 | 1,106 | 9,952 | | | 1,106 | 9,952 | 11,058 | 886 | Dec. 2006 | 34.7 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Richmond, Missouri |
5,630 | 530 | 6,505 | | | 530 | 6,505 | 7,035 | 576 | Dec. 2006 | 34.8 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail facilities in Bourne, Sandwich and Chelmsford, Massachusetts |
1,423 | 1,418 | 2,157 | | | 1,418 | 2,157 | 3,575 | 214 | Dec. 2006 | 31.1 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Carlsbad, California |
4,763 | 2,618 | 4,880 | | | 2,618 | 4,880 | 7,498 | 488 | Dec. 2006 | 30.8 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fitness and recreational facility in Houston, Texas |
3,745 | 1,613 | 3,398 | | | 1,613 | 3,398 | 5,011 | 353 | Dec. 2006 | 29.7 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theater in Hickory Creek, Texas |
3,792 | 3,138 | 6,752 | | | 3,138 | 6,752 | 9,890 | 612 | Dec. 2006 | 34 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Educational facilities in Chandler, Arizona; Fleming Island,
Florida; Ackworth, Georgia; Hauppauge and Patchogue, New York;
Sugar Land, Texas; Hampton, Virginia and Silverdale, Washington |
5,926 | 4,312 | 9,963 | | (380 | ) | 4,312 | 9,583 | 13,895 | 1,001 | Dec. 2006 | 29.6 yrs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Indianapolis, Indiana |
1,822 | 1,035 | 6,594 | | | 1,035 | 6,594 | 7,629 | 689 | Dec. 2006 | 29.5 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facilities in Greenville, South Carolina |
4,664 | 625 | 8,178 | | | 625 | 8,178 | 8,803 | 906 | Dec. 2006 | 27.8 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial and office facilities in San Diego, CA |
35,350 | 7,247 | 29,098 | | | 7,247 | 29,098 | 36,345 | 3,281 | Dec. 2006 | 40 yrs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 750,605 | $ | 221,102 | $ | 895,749 | $ | 126,599 | $ | 12,516 | $ | 228,279 | $ | 1,027,687 | $ | 1,255,966 | $ | 215,967 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Amount at | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs Capitalized | Increase | which Carried | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial Cost to Company | Subsequent to | (Decrease) in Net | at Close of | Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Encumbrances (c) | Land | Buildings | Acquisition (a) | Investments (b) | Period Total | Acquired | |||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Financing Method: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facilities in Dallas and Greenville, Texas |
$ | 12,104 | $ | 460 | $ | 20,427 | $ | | $ | (3,192 | ) | $ | 17,695 | Nov. 1999 | ||||||||||||||
Multiplex theater facility in Midlothian, Virginia |
8,800 | | 10,819 | 854 | 812 | 12,485 | Sep. 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Office facility in Scottsdale, Arizona |
13,341 | | 25,415 | | | 25,415 | Sep. 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and distribution facility in Elk Grove Village, Illinois |
1,487 | | 4,172 | 4 | (2,040 | ) | 2,136 | Oct. 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Multiplex motion picture theater in Pensacola, Florida |
6,875 | | 4,112 | 2,541 | | 6,653 | Dec. 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial and manufacturing facilities in Old Fort and
Albemarie, North Carolina; Holmesville, Ohio and Springfield,
Tennessee |
7,062 | 2,961 | 24,474 | 20 | (9,757 | ) | 17,698 | Sep. 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Educational facility in Mooresville, North Carolina |
5,389 | 1,600 | 9,276 | 130 | (459 | ) | 10,547 | Feb. 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial facility in Ashburn Junction, Virginia (d) |
| 4,683 | 15,116 | | | 19,799 | Dec. 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 55,058 | $ | 9,704 | $ | 113,811 | $ | 3,549 | $ | (14,636 | ) | $ | 112,428 | ||||||||||||||||
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 81
Table of Contents
NOTES to SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE and ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
(a) | Consists of the costs of improvements subsequent to purchase and acquisition costs, including legal fees, appraisal fees, title costs and other related professional fees. | |
(b) | The increase (decrease) in net investment was primarily due to (i) the amortization of unearned income from net investment in direct financing leases, which produces a periodic rate of return that at times may be greater or less than lease payments received, (ii) sales of properties, (iii) impairment charges, (iv) changes in foreign currency exchange rates and (v) adjustments in connection with purchasing certain minority interests. | |
(c) | Reconciliation of real estate and accumulated depreciation (see below): |
Reconciliation of Real Estate Subject to | ||||||||||||
Operating Leases | ||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 1,275,775 | $ | 1,301,505 | $ | 1,291,598 | ||||||
Additions |
2,921 | 527 | 17,524 | |||||||||
Dispositions |
(23,473 | ) | (16,799 | ) | (30,088 | ) | ||||||
Reclassification from equity investment, direct financing
lease or funds held in escrow |
45,734 | | | |||||||||
Reclassification to assets held for sale |
(11,421 | ) | | | ||||||||
Impairment charges |
(37,779 | ) | | | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
4,209 | (9,458 | ) | 22,471 | ||||||||
Balance at close of year |
$ | 1,255,966 | $ | 1,275,775 | $ | 1,301,505 | ||||||
Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation | ||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 188,739 | $ | 162,374 | $ | 137,262 | ||||||
Depreciation expense |
29,614 | 29,527 | 29,085 | |||||||||
Dispositions |
(2,438 | ) | (1,883 | ) | (6,471 | ) | ||||||
Reclassification from equity investment |
2,217 | | | |||||||||
Reclassification to assets held for sale |
(2,771 | ) | | | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
606 | (1,279 | ) | 2,498 | ||||||||
Balance at close of year |
$ | 215,967 | $ | 188,739 | $ | 162,374 | ||||||
At December 31, 2009, the aggregate cost of real estate, net of accumulated depreciation and
accounted for as operating leases, owned by us and our consolidated subsidiaries for U.S. federal
income tax purposes was $923.4 million.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 82
Table of Contents
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. |
None.
Item 9A(T). | Controls and Procedures. |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our disclosure controls and procedures include our controls and other procedures designed to
provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in this and other reports
filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the required time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and
that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive
officer and acting chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
Our chief executive officer and acting chief financial officer, after conducting an evaluation,
together with members of our management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2009, have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of
December 31, 2009 at a reasonable level of assurance.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S.
GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations
of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31,
2009. In making this assessment, we used criteria set forth in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on our assessment, we concluded that, at December 31, 2009, our internal control over
financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not
subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary
rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only managements report in this Annual Report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most
recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. | Other Information. |
None.
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 83
Table of Contents
PART III
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. |
This information will be contained in our definitive proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, to be filed within 120 days following the end of our fiscal year, and is incorporated
by reference.
Item 11. | Executive Compensation. |
This information will be contained in our definitive proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, to be filed within 120 days following the end of our fiscal year, and is incorporated
by reference.
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. |
This information will be contained in our definitive proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, to be filed within 120 days following the end of our fiscal year, and is incorporated
by reference.
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. |
This information will be contained in our definitive proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, to be filed within 120 days following the end of our fiscal year, and is incorporated
by reference.
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
This information will be contained in our definitive proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, to be filed within 120 days following the end of our fiscal year, and is incorporated
by reference.
PART IV
Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules. |
(a) (1) and (2) Financial statements and schedules see index to financial statements and
schedule included in Item 8.
(3) Exhibits:
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Report. Documents other than those designated as
being filed herewith are incorporated herein by reference.
Exhibit No. | Description | Method of Filing | ||||
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation of Registrant |
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-31437) filed July 16, 1997 | ||||
3.2 | Articles of Amendment
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-76761) filed November 16, 1999 | ||||
3.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant
|
Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 filed August 14, 2009 | ||||
4.1 | Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-96869) filed July 22, 2002 | ||||
10.1 | Asset Management Agreement dated as of September 2, 2008 between
Corporate Property Associates 14 Incorporated and W.P. Carey & Co. B.V.
|
Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed November 14, 2008 |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 84
Table of Contents
Exhibit No. | Description | Method of Filing | ||||
10.2 | Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement dated as of October 1, 2009
between Corporate Property Associates 14 Incorporated and Carey Asset
Management Corp. |
Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 filed November 13, 2009 | ||||
21.1 | Subsidiaries of Registrant
|
Filed herewith | ||||
23.1 | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
Filed herewith | ||||
31.1 | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Filed herewith | ||||
31.2 | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Filed herewith | ||||
32 | Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Filed herewith |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 85
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
Corporate Property Associates 14 Incorporated |
||||
Date 3/26/2010 | By: | /s/ Mark J. DeCesaris | ||
Mark J. DeCesaris | ||||
Managing Director and Acting Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ Wm. Polk Carey
|
Chairman of the Board and Director | 3/26/2010 | ||
/s/ Gordon F. DuGan
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
3/26/2010 | ||
/s/ Mark J. DeCesaris
|
Managing Director and Acting Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
3/26/2010 | ||
/s/ Thomas J. Ridings Jr.
|
Executive Director and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
3/26/2010 | ||
/s/ Marshall E. Blume
|
Director | 3/26/2010 | ||
/s/ Richard J. Pinola
|
Director | 3/26/2010 | ||
/s/ James D. Price
|
Director | 3/26/2010 |
CPA®:14 2009 10-K 86