Attached files

file filename
EX-31 - EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CEO CERTIFICATION - Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc.laufer10q123109ex311.htm
EX-32 - EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CEO CERTIFICATION - Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc.laufer10q123109ex321.htm
EX-31 - EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CFO CERTIFICATION - Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc.laufer10q123109ex312.htm
EX-32 - EX-32.2 SECTION 906 CFO CERTIFICATION - Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc.laufer10q123109ex322.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q


(Mark One)


 X . QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009


     . TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT


For the transition period from ___________ to _____________


Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)


Nevada

 

04-3626788

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(IRS Employer Identification No.)


3276 Buford Drive, Bldg. 104

Buford, GA 30519

(Address of principal executive offices)


678-596-6872

(Issuer's telephone number)



Check whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  X . No      .


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):


Large Accelerated Filer      . Accelerated Filer      . Non-Accelerated Filer      . Smaller Reporting Company  X .


State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 275,450,000 shares of Common Stock, as of February 7, 2010.


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) (check one): Yes      . No  X .


Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes      . No  X .




LAUFER BRIDGE ENTERPRISES, INC.


 

Page Number

PART 1 - Financial Information

3

 

 

Item 1 - Unaudited Financial Information:

3

 

 

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and September 30, 2009

3

 

 

Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 (Unaudited)

4

 

 

Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 (Unaudited)

5

 

 

Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements (Unaudited)

6

 

 

Item 2. - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

12

 

 

Item 3. - Controls and Procedures

15

 

 

PART II. - Other Information (Items 1-6)

16



2



LAUFER BRIDGE ENTERPRISES, INC.


Balance Sheets


 

 

December 31,

2009

(Unaudited)

 

September 30,

2009

ASSETS

Current Assets:

 

 

 

 

Cash

$

29,818

$

29,821

Time deposits

 

10,225

 

26,224

Total current assets

 

40,043

 

56,045

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

Security deposits

 

12,650

 

12,650

Goodwill

 

55,000

 

55,000

Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,697 and $890, respectively

 

16,671

 

13,813

Total other assets

 

84,321

 

81,463

TOTAL ASSETS

$

124,364

$

137,508

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Note payable

$

28,800

$

28,800

Accrued expenses

 

36,681

 

133,891

Total current liabilities

 

65,481

 

162,691

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) :

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock: $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding

 

-

 

-

Common stock: $0.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 275,450,000 and 174,350,000 issued and outstanding, respectively

 

275,450

 

174,350

Additional paid-in capital

 

(104,308)

 

(104,308)

Accumulated deficit

 

(112,259)

 

(95,225)

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

58,883

 

(25,183)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

$

124,364

$

137,508


See accompanying notes to the financial statements.



3



LAUFER BRIDGE ENTERPRISES, INC.


Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

 

 

Three Months

Ended

December 31,

2009

Net revenues:

 

 

Admission revenues

$

114,223

Instruction and other

 

1,750

Total net revenues

 

115,973

 

 

 

Operating expenses

 

 

Rent

 

37,225

Director/contractor/employee

 

51,254

General and administrative

 

44,528

Total operating expenses

 

133,007

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

 

(17,034)

 

 

 

Income taxes

 

-

 

 

 

Net loss

$

(17,034)

 

 

 

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted

$

(0.00)

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted

 

238,086,957


See accompanying notes to the financial statements.



4



LAUFER BRIDGE ENTERPRISES, INC.


Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)


 

 

Three Months

Ended

December 31,

2009

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

Net loss

$

(17,034)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

Depreciation

 

807

Change in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

Increase in accrued expenses

 

3,890

Net Cash Used In Operating Activities

 

(12,337)

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

Purchase of furniture and fixtures

 

(3,665)

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities

 

(3,665)

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET CHANGE IN CASH

 

(16,002)

CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

56,045

CASH AT END OF PERIOD

$

40,043


See accompanying notes to the financial statements.



5



LAUFER BRIDGE ENTERPRISES, INC.

December 31, 2009

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)


NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION


Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc. ("Laufer" or the “Company”) was founded as a New York corporation on March 13, 2002 and became a corporation under the laws of the State of Nevada in January 2008. At inception, Laufer acquired the assets of an existing bridge club. Laufer operates a bridge club offering tournament style duplicate bridge games and instruction in playing bridge under the name of The Bridge Deck. It is generally open seven days per week and is located in Westchester County, New York.


Creative Edge Nutrition, Inc. (“Creative”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 11, 2009. Creative plans on becoming an innovative bio-science company engaged in the development of nutraceuticals and health supplements.


Merger of Creative Edge Nutrition, Inc.


On July 22, 2009, Laufer entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) among Laufer and certain of its shareholders, Creative Edge Nutrition, Inc. (“Creative”), and the shareholders of Creative (the “Creative Shareholders”).


Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Laufer agreed to issue an aggregate of 142,950,000 restricted shares of Laufer's common stock to the Creative Shareholders in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Creative. The closing of the Agreement was subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions, including, but not limited to the receipt of all requisite consents, waivers and approvals by the Company and Creative, and the transaction closed July 22, 2009.


The merger was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization. Creative is the acquirer for accounting purposes and Laufer is the issuer. Accordingly, Creative's historical financial statements for periods prior to the acquisition become those of the acquirer retroactively restated for the equivalent number of shares issued in the merger. Operations prior to the merger are those of Creative. From inception on May 11, 2009 until the merger date, July 22, 2009, Creative had no operations. All revenues during the reporting period relates to the operations of the Laufer, from October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009.


NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Basis of presentation


The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2009 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on January 13, 2010.


Creative is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Laufer. The consolidated financial statements consist of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Creative Edge Nutrition, Inc., collectively referred to herein as the “Company” or “Laufer.” The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of Laufer and Creative as of December 31, 2009 and for the interim period then ended. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.


Use of Estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.


Fiscal year end


The Company elected September 30 as its fiscal year end.



6



Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

 

Furniture and fixtures


Furniture and fixtures are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of five years. Upon sale or retirement of furniture and fixtures, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in consolidated statements of operations.


Goodwill


Goodwill represents the excess cost of a business acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. In accordance with paragraph 350-20-35-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for goodwill is not amortized. The Company periodically, at least on an annual basis, reviews goodwill, considering factors such as projected cash flows and revenue and earnings multiples, to determine whether the carrying value of the goodwill is impaired. If the goodwill is deemed to be impaired, the difference between the carrying amount reflected in the financial statements and the estimated fair value is recognized as an expense in the period in which the impairment occurs. There was no impairment of goodwill at December 31, 2009.


Impairment of long-lived assets


The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include goodwill and furniture and fixtures, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.


The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company determined that there were no impairments of long-lived assets as of December 31, 2009.


Fair value of financial instruments


The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:


Level 1

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.


Level 2

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.


Level 3

Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.


The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The Company’s note payable approximates the fair value of such instrument based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangement at December 31, 2009.



7



The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at September 30, 2009, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the interim period ended December 31, 2009.


Revenue recognition


The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned less estimated future doubtful accounts. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.


Advertising


Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.


Stock-based compensation for obtaining employee services and equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services


The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of section 505-50-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.


Income taxes


The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.


The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.


Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share


Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period. There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as of December 31, 2009.



8



Recently Issued Accounting Standards


In June 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted final rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), as amended by SEC Release No. 33-9072 on October 13, 2009. Commencing with the Company’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, the Company is required to include a report of management on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must include a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company; of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of year end; of the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and that the Company’s independent accounting firm has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which report is also required to be filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.


In June 2009, the FASB approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP to be launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04, Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments - Amendment to Section 480-10-S99, which represents an update to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This Update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques: 1. A valuation technique that uses: a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets. 2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08, Earnings Per Share – Amendments to Section 260-10-S99, which represents technical corrections to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53, Computation of Earnings Per Share for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42, The Effect of the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09, Accounting for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. This Update represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4, Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method Investee. Additionally, it adds observer comment Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



9



In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 – Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent), which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this Update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this Update also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the investor’s ability to redeem its investments a the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund investments that will be make by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01 “Equity Topic 505 – Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash”, which clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)). Those distributions should be accounted for and included in EPS calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25- 14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards codification. The amendments in this Update also provide a technical correction to the Accounting Standards Codification. The correction moves guidance that was previously included in the Overview and Background Section to the definition of a stock dividend in the Master Glossary. That guidance indicates that a stock dividend takes nothing from the property of the corporation and adds nothing to the interests of the stockholders. It also indicates that the proportional interest of each shareholder remains the same, and is a key factor to consider in determining whether a distribution is a stock dividend.


In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-02 “Consolidation Topic 810 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 810-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to clarify that the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions of the Subtopic and related guidance applies to the following:


1.

A subsidiary or group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity

2.

A subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture

3.

An exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for a noncontrolling interest in an entity (including an equity method investee or joint venture).


The amendments in this Update also clarify that the decrease in ownership guidance in Subtopic 810-10 does not apply to the following transactions even if they involve businesses:


1.

Sales of in substance real estate. Entities should apply the sale of real estate guidance in Subtopics 360-20 (Property, Plant, and Equipment) and 976-605 (Retail/Land) to such transactions.

2.

Conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights. Entities should apply the mineral property conveyance and related transactions guidance in Subtopic 932-360 (Oil and Gas-Property, Plant, and Equipment) to such transactions.


If a decrease in ownership occurs in a subsidiary that is not a business or nonprofit activity, an entity first needs to consider whether the substance of the transaction causing the decrease in ownership is addressed in other U.S. GAAP, such as transfers of financial assets, revenue recognition, exchanges of nonmonetary assets, sales of in substance real estate, or conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights, and apply that guidance as applicable. If no other guidance exists, an entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 810-10.


Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.



10



NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN


The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $112,259 at December 31, 2009, with a net loss of $17,034 and net cash used in operations of $12,337 for the interim period ended December 31, 2009, respectively. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


While the Company is attempting to produce sufficient sales, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support the Company’s daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to produce sales volume and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.


The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.


NOTE 4 - NOTE PAYABLE


A Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) in the amount of $28,800 had been entered into between Gary B. Wolff, Laufer's outside counsel, and Laufer to settle unpaid legal fees due to Mr. Wolff with respect to Laufer's Registration Statement. The note accrues interest at 2% per annum and matured on December 1, 2008. The Note is convertible at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0.001 per share.


NOTE 5 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


The Company is authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock.


Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement described in Note 1, Laufer agreed to issue an aggregate of 142,950,000 restricted shares of Laufer's common stock to the Creative Shareholders in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Creative.


On November 3, 2009 the Company issued an aggregate of 101,100,000 restricted shares of its common stock to settle $101,100 in obligations to individuals and entities which had been active in providing advice in the planning process of Creative. Of this amount, $21,200 was due to the Company's President and $20,000 was due to the Company's Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director.


NOTE 6 - COMMITMENT AND CONTINGENCIES


The Company is obligated under a lease for the facility used by its Bridge Deck operations. The lease is with an unrelated party, expires on March 31, 2012 and calls for the following minimum annual rental payments:


January 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010

24,725

April 1, 2010 through March 31, 2011

101,200

April 1, 2011 through March 31, 2012

103,500


NOTE 7 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS


The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date of December 31, 2009 through February 16, 2010, the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. The Management of the Company determined that there was no reportable subsequent event to be disclosed.



11



ITEM 2


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995


Certain matters discussed in this Quarterly report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements contained in this annual report involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:


·

our future operating results,

·

our business prospects,

·

our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties,

·

the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we may be involved,

·

the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital, and

·

other factors identified in our filings with the SEC, press releases and other public communications.


These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as such because the context of the statement will include words such as we “believe," “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate” or words of similar meaning. Similarly, statements that describe our future plans, objectives or goals are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which are described in close proximity to such statements and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of this Form 10-Q. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the date of this report and we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.


The following discussion and analysis provides information which the Company’s management believes to be relevant to an assessment and understanding of the Company's results of operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read together with the Company's financial statements and the notes to financial statements, which are included in this report.


Operations


A summary of our operations for the three months ended December 31, 2009:


 

 

Three Months

Ended

December 31,

2009

 

 

 

Revenues

$

115,973

Expenses

$

133,007

Net loss

$

(17,034)

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted

$

(0.00)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding – basic and diluted

 

238,086,957


The merger between Creative and Laufer was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization. Creative is the acquirer for accounting purposes, and Laufer is the issuer. Accordingly, Creative's historical financial statements for periods prior to the acquisition become those of the acquirer retroactively restated for the equivalent number of shares issued in the merger. From inception on May 11, 2009 through, December 31, 2009, Creative had no operations. All revenue during the reporting period relates to the operations of the Bridge Deck from July 22, 2009 until December 31, 2009.


Other


As a corporate policy, we will not incur any cash obligations that we cannot satisfy with known resources, of which there are currently none except as described in “Liquidity” below and/or elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. We believe that the perception that many people have of a public company make it more likely that they will accept restricted securities from a public company as consideration for indebtedness to them than they would from a private company. We have not performed any studies of this matter. Our conclusion is based on our own observations. However, there can be no assurances that we will be successful in any of those efforts although we were successful in issuing 100,100,000 restricted shares to satisfy obligations of $100,100. Additionally, issuance of restricted shares would necessarily dilute the percentage of ownership interest of our stockholders.



12



Liquidity


We need to raise debt or equity capital to develop the business plan of Creative. The estimated amount needed to achieve some revenue producing operations is at least $45,000. To date we have not undertaken any formal procedures or efforts to raise any debt or equity financing. Private capital, if sought, will be sought from former business associates of our President or private investors referred to us by those business associates. If a market for our shares ever develops, of which there can be no assurances, we may use restricted shares of our common stock to compensate employees/consultants and independent contractors wherever possible. We believe that operations of the Bridge Deck are generating sufficient cash to continue its operations for the next 12 months from the date of this annual report.


In November 2009 we issued an aggregate of 101,100,000 restricted shares of our common stock to settle $101,100 in obligations to individuals and entities which been active in providing advice in the planning process of Creative. Of this amount, $21,200 was due to our President, Joel Stohlman, and $20,000 was due to Reid Stone, our Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director. We recorded expenses of $101,100 in connection with the issuance of these shares, which were exempt from registration in accordance with Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an Issuer not involved in a public offering.


We have become a public company and, by doing so, have incurred and will continue to incur additional significant expenses for legal, accounting and related services. We estimate that these costs will range up to $50,000 per year for the next few years and will be higher if our business volume and activity increases. These obligations will reduce our ability and resources to fund other aspects of our business. We hope to be able to use our status as a public company to increase our ability to use noncash means of settling obligations and compensate independent contractors who provide professional services to us, although there can be no assurances that we will continue to be successful in any of those efforts. We will reduce the compensation levels paid to our president if there is insufficient cash generated from operations to satisfy these costs.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements


In June 2003, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Commencing with our annual report for the year ended September 30, 2010, we will be required to include a report of management on our internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must include a statement.


§

of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting;

§

of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of year end; and

§

of the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.


Furthermore, in the following fiscal year, it is required to file the registered accounting firm’s attestation report separately on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting on whether it believes that the Company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting.


In June 2009, the FASB approved the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP to be launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04, Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments - Amendment to Section 480-10-S99 which represents an update to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



13



In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This Update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques: 1. A valuation technique that uses: a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets. 2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments in this Update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08, Earnings Per Share – Amendments to Section 260-10-S99, which represents technical corrections to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53, Computation of Earnings Per Share for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42, The Effect of the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09, Accounting for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. This Update represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4, Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method Investee. Additionally, it adds observer comment Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 – Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent), which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this Update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this Update also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the investor’s ability to redeem its investments a the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund investments that will be make by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this Update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01 “Equity Topic 505 – Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash”, which clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)). Those distributions should be accounted for and included in EPS calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25- 14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards codification. The amendments in this Update also provide a technical correction to the Accounting Standards Codification. The correction moves guidance that was previously included in the Overview and Background Section to the definition of a stock dividend in the Master Glossary. That guidance indicates that a stock dividend takes nothing from the property of the corporation and adds nothing to the interests of the stockholders. It also indicates that the proportional interest of each shareholder remains the same, and is a key factor to consider in determining whether a distribution is a stock dividend.



14



In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-02 “Consolidation Topic 810 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 810-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to clarify that the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions of the Subtopic and related guidance applies to the following:


1.

A subsidiary or group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity

2.

A subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture

3.

An exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for a noncontrolling interest in an entity (including an equity method investee or joint venture).


The amendments in this Update also clarify that the decrease in ownership guidance in Subtopic 810-10 does not apply to the following transactions even if they involve businesses:


1.

Sales of in substance real estate. Entities should apply the sale of real estate guidance in Subtopics 360-20 (Property, Plant, and Equipment) and 976-605 (Retail/Land) to such transactions.

2.

Conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights. Entities should apply the mineral property conveyance and related transactions guidance in Subtopic 932-360 (Oil and Gas-Property, Plant, and Equipment) to such transactions.


If a decrease in ownership occurs in a subsidiary that is not a business or nonprofit activity, an entity first needs to consider whether the substance of the transaction causing the decrease in ownership is addressed in other U.S. GAAP, such as transfers of financial assets, revenue recognition, exchanges of nonmonetary assets, sales of in substance real estate, or conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights, and apply that guidance as applicable. If no other guidance exists, an entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 810-10.


Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.


Critical Accounting Policies


The preparation of financial statements and related notes requires us to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.


An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements.


Financial Reporting Release No. 60 requires all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. There are no critical policies or decisions that rely on judgments that are based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made. Note 2 to the financial statements includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our financial statements.


Seasonality


We have not noted a significant seasonal impact in our business, although we generally draw fewer bridge players during the winter.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K, obligations under any guarantee contracts or contingent obligations. We also have no other commitments, other than the costs of being a public company that will increase our operating costs or cash requirements in the future


ITEM 3


CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) that are designed to assure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.



15



As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), as of the end of the period covered by this report, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of that date.


There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


PART II

 

 

 

OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

Item 1

Legal Proceedings

 

 

 

 

 

None

 

 

 

 

Item 2

Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

 

 

 

None

 

 

 

 

Item 3

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

 

 

 

None

 

 

 

 

Item 4

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Shareholders

 

 

 

 

None

 

 

 

 

Item 5

Other Information

 

 

 

 

None

 

 

 

 

Item 6

Exhibits

 

 

 


Exhibit Number

 

Description

31.1

 

Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive

31.2

 

Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32.1

 

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 – Chief Executive Officer

32.2

 

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 – Chief Financial Officer




16



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


LAUFER BRIDGE ENTERPRISES, Inc.

(Registrant)






/s/ Joel Stohlman                                           

Joel Stohlman

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer




February 16, 2010



17