Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - Atlas Resources Public #16-2007 (A) L.P. | exhibit32_2.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Atlas Resources Public #16-2007 (A) L.P. | exhibit31_2.htm |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Atlas Resources Public #16-2007 (A) L.P. | exhibit32_1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Atlas Resources Public #16-2007 (A) L.P. | exhibit31_1.htm |
United
States
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission
|
||
|
||
Washington,
D.C. 20549
|
||
Form
10-Q
|
||
(Mark
One)
|
||
R
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
|
||
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
For
the transition period from _____ to _____
|
||
Commission
file number 333-138068-02
|
||
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
|
||
(Name
of small business issuer in its charter)
|
||
Delaware
|
20-8219605
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
|
Westpointe
Corporate Center One
|
||
1550
Coraopolis Heights Rd. 2nd Floor
|
||
Moon
Township, PA
|
15108
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(zip
code)
|
|
Issuer’s
telephone number, including area code: (412)
262-2830
|
||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities
|
||
Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports),
|
||
and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes R
No o
|
||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive
|
||
Data
File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12
|
||
months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and
post such files). Yes o No R
|
||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller
reporting
|
||
company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”,
“non-accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”
in
|
||
Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check One) Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller
reporting
|
||
company
R
|
||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No R
|
||
Transitional
Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes o No R
|
1
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
(A
Delaware Limited Partnership)
INDEX
TO QUARTERLY REPORT
ON
FORM 10-Q
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
PAGE
|
|
Item
1:
|
Financial
Statements
|
||
Balance
Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
3
|
||
Statements
of Net Earnings for the Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008
|
4
|
||
Statement
of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the Nine Months ended September 30,
2009
|
5
|
||
Statements
of Cash Flows for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
6
|
||
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
7-18
|
||
Item
2:
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition or Plan of
Operations
|
18-23
|
|
Item
4:
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
24
|
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
6:
|
Exhibits
|
24
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
25
|
||
CERTIFICATIONS
|
26-29
|
2
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
BALANCE
SHEETS
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 1,228,800 | $ | 2,453,100 | ||||
Accounts
receivable – affiliate
|
5,254,600 | 9,241,000 | ||||||
Short-term
hedge receivable due from affiliate
|
2,334,200 | 8,165,800 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
8,817,600 | 19,859,900 | ||||||
Oil
and gas properties, net
|
52,843,400 | 57,837,300 | ||||||
Long-term
hedge receivable due from affiliate
|
1,658,100 | 5,253,600 | ||||||
$ | 63,319,100 | $ | 82,950,800 | |||||
LIABILITIES
AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
$ | 49,900 | $ | 22,200 | ||||
Short-term
hedge liability due to affiliate
|
34,300 | 709,400 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
84,200 | 731,600 | ||||||
Asset
retirement obligation
|
5,949,900 | 5,708,300 | ||||||
Long-term
hedge liability due to affiliate
|
407,400 | 638,200 | ||||||
Partners’
capital:
|
||||||||
Managing
general partner
|
20,784,700 | 26,352,900 | ||||||
Limited
partners (20,000 units)
|
38,556,000 | 49,519,800 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(2,463,100 | ) | — | |||||
Total
partners' capital
|
56,877,600 | 75,872,700 | ||||||
$ | 63,319,100 | $ | 82,950,800 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
3
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
STATEMENTS
OF NET EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
REVENUES
|
||||||||||||||||
Natural
gas and oil
|
$ | 4,075,600 | $ | 9,852,600 | $ | 14,509,700 | $ | 34,552,400 | ||||||||
Interest
income
|
400 | 3,600 | 1,900 | 15,000 | ||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
4,076,000 | 9,856,200 | 14,511,600 | 34,567,400 | ||||||||||||
COSTS
AND EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Production
|
2,051,100 | 1,561,300 | 6,117,000 | 7,547,800 | ||||||||||||
Depletion
|
1,574,800 | 5,370,800 | 5,511,500 | 19,440,200 | ||||||||||||
Accretion
of asset retirement obligation
|
85,600 | 52,200 | 256,900 | 156,600 | ||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
159,800 | 160,000 | 459,800 | 505,500 | ||||||||||||
Total
expenses
|
3,871,300 | 7,144,300 | 12,345,200 | 27,650,100 | ||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 204,700 | $ | 2,711,900 | $ | 2,166,400 | $ | 6,917,300 | ||||||||
Allocation
of net earnings (loss):
|
||||||||||||||||
Managing
general partner
|
$ | 329,000 | $ | 2,026,000 | $ | 1,699,400 | $ | 6,650,500 | ||||||||
Limited
partners
|
$ | (124,300 | ) | $ | 685,900 | $ | 467,000 | $ | 266,800 | |||||||
Net
(loss) earnings per limited partnership unit
|
$ | (7 | ) | $ | 34 | $ | 23 | $ | 13 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
4
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
STATEMENT
OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||
Managing
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||
General
|
Limited
|
Comprehensive
|
||||||||||||||
Partner
|
Partners
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
at January 1, 2009
|
$ | 26,352,900 | $ | 49,519,800 | $ | — | $ | 75,872,700 | ||||||||
Participation
in revenues and expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
production revenues
|
3,184,200 | 5,208,500 | — | 8,392,700 | ||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
700 | 1,200 | — | 1,900 | ||||||||||||
Depletion
|
(1,213,600 | ) | (4,297,900 | ) | — | (5,511,500 | ) | |||||||||
Accretion
of asset retirement obligation
|
(97,500 | ) | (159,400 | ) | — | (256,900 | ) | |||||||||
General
and administrative
|
(174,400 | ) | (285,400 | ) | — | (459,800 | ) | |||||||||
Net
earnings
|
1,699,400 | 467,000 | — | 2,166,400 | ||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss
|
— | — | (2,463,100 | ) | (2,463,100 | ) | ||||||||||
Subordination
|
(1,096,300 | ) | 1,096,300 | — | — | |||||||||||
Asset
contributions
|
531,100 | — | — | 531,100 | ||||||||||||
Distributions
to partners
|
(6,702,400 | ) | (12,527,100 | ) | — | (19,229,500 | ) | |||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2009
|
$ | 20,784,700 | $ | 38,556,000 | $ | (2,463,100 | ) | $ | 56,877,600 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
5
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||
September
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 2,166,400 | $ | 6,917,300 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depletion
|
5,511,500 | 19,440,200 | ||||||
Non-cash
loss on derivative value
|
6,058,100 | — | ||||||
Well
plugging and abandonment
|
(15,300 | ) | — | |||||
Accretion
of asset retirement obligation
|
256,900 | 156,600 | ||||||
Decrease
(increase) in accounts receivable-affiliate
|
3,986,400 | (1,415,500 | ) | |||||
Increase
(decrease) in accrued liabilities
|
27,700 | (11,500 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
17,991,700 | 25,087,100 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of tangible equipment
|
13,500 | — | ||||||
Net
cash provided from investing activities
|
13,500 | — | ||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Distributions
to partners
|
(19,229,500 | ) | (23,709,800 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(19,229,500 | ) | (23,709,800 | ) | ||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,224,300 | ) | 1,377,300 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
2,453,100 | 1,573,600 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 1,228,800 | $ | 2,950,900 | ||||
Supplemental Schedule
of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
Assets
contributed by managing general partner:
|
||||||||
Tangible
equipment
|
$ | 531,100 | $ | 6,704,500 | ||||
Intangible
drilling costs
|
— | 706,000 | ||||||
$ | 531,100 | $ | 7,410,500 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
6
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Atlas
America Public 16-2007 (A) L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a Delaware Limited
Partnership which includes Atlas Resources, LLC of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as
Managing General Partner ("MGP") and Operator, and 5,021 subscribers to units as
Limited Partners. The Partnership was formed on September 15, 2006 to drill and
operate gas wells located primarily in Pennsylvania, New York, Tennessee, West
Virginia and Ohio. The Partnership has no employees and relies on its MGP for
management which, in turn, relies on its parent company, Atlas Energy Resources,
LLC, ("Atlas Energy"), for administrative services. On September 29, 2009, Atlas
Energy Resources, LLC and Atlas America, Inc. (“Atlas America”) (NASDAQ: ATLS)
merged with Atlas Energy Resources, LLC becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of
Atlas America. In addition, Atlas America changed its name to “Atlas Energy,
Inc.”
The
financial statements as of September 30, 2009 and for the three months and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are unaudited except that the balance
sheet at December 31, 2008 is derived from audited financial statements. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted in this
Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) However, in the opinion of management, these interim
financial statements include all the necessary adjustments to fairly present the
results of the interim periods presented. Management has considered for
disclosure any material subsequent events through November 16, 2009, the date
the financial statements were issued. The unaudited interim financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in
the Partnership's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The results of
operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 may not
necessarily be indicative of the results of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In
addition to matters discussed further in this note, the Partnership’s
significant accounting policies are detailed in its audited financial statements
and notes thereto in the Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC.
Use
of Estimates
Preparation
of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues, costs and expenses
during the reporting period. The Partnership’s financial statements are based on
a number of significant estimates, including revenue and expense accruals,
depletion, fair value of derivative instruments and the probability of
forecasted transactions. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Possible Losses
In
evaluating the need for an allowance for possible losses, the Partnership's MGP,
performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits
based upon payment history and the customer’s current creditworthiness, as
determined by review of its customers' credit information. Credit is extended on
an unsecured basis to many of its energy customers. At September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the Partnership's MGP's credit evaluation indicated that the
Partnership has no need for an allowance for possible losses.
7
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Revenue
Recognition
The
Partnership generally sells natural gas and crude oil at prevailing market
prices. Revenue is recognized when produced quantities are delivered
to a custody transfer point, persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists,
the rights and responsibility of ownership pass to the purchaser upon delivery,
collection of revenue from the sale are reasonably assured and the sales price
is fixed or determinable. Revenues from the production of natural gas
and crude oil in which the Partnership has an interest with other producers are
recognized on the basis of the Partnership’s percentage ownership of working
interest or overriding royalty. Generally, the Partnership’s sales contracts are
based on pricing provisions that are tied to a market index, with certain
adjustments based on proximity to gathering and transmission lines and the
quality of its natural gas.
Because
there are timing differences between the delivery of natural gas and oil and its
receipt of a delivery statement, the Partnership has unbilled revenues. These
revenues are accrued based upon volumetric data from the Partnership’s records
and estimates of the related transportation and compression fees which are, in
turn, based upon applicable product prices. The Partnership had unbilled trade
receivables at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 of $3,769,400 and
$6,929,100, respectively, which are included in accounts receivable on the
Partnership’s Balance Sheets.
Oil
and Gas Properties
The
Partnership follows the successful-efforts method of accounting for oil and gas
producing activities. Oil and gas properties are recorded at
cost. Depletion is determined on a field-by-field basis using the
units-of-production method for well and related equipment costs based on proved
developed reserves associated with each field. Depletion rates are determined
based on reserve quantity estimates and the capitalized costs of developed
producing properties. In addition, accumulated depletion includes
impairment adjustments to reflect the write-down to fair market value of the oil
and gas properties. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Major
renewals and improvements that extend the useful lives of the property are
capitalized. Oil is converted to gas equivalent basis (“Mcfe”) at the rate one
barrel equals 6 thousand cubic feet (“Mcf”).
Upon the
sale or retirement of a complete or partial unit of a proved property, the cost
is eliminated from the property accounts, and the resultant gain or loss is
reclassified to accumulated depletion. As a result of retirements the
Partnership reclassified $391,300 from oil and gas properties, to accumulated
depletion for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Oil
and gas properties consist of the following at the dates
indicated:
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Natural
gas and oil properties:
|
||||||||
Proved
properties:
|
||||||||
Leasehold
interests
|
$ | 6,842,600 | $ | 6,854,000 | ||||
Wells
and related equipment
|
262,381,200 | 262,243,500 | ||||||
269,223,800 | 269,097,500 | |||||||
Accumulated
depletion
|
(216,380,400 | ) | (211,260,200 | ) | ||||
$ | 52,843,400 | $ | 57,837,300 |
8
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Impairment
of Oil and Gas Properties and Long-Lived Assets
The
Partnership’s oil and gas properties are reviewed for impairment annually or
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts
may not be recoverable. Oil and gas properties are reviewed for potential
impairments at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash
flows.
The
review of the Partnership’s oil and gas properties is done on a field-by-field
basis by determining if the historical cost of proved properties less the
applicable accumulated depletion and abandonment is less than the estimated
expected undiscounted future cash flows. The expected future cash flows are
estimated based on the Partnership’s plans to continue to produce and develop
proved reserves. Expected future cash flow from the sale of production of
reserves is calculated based on estimated future prices. The Partnership
estimates prices based upon current contracts in place, adjusted for basis
differentials and market related information including published futures prices.
The estimated future level of production is based on assumptions surrounding
future levels of prices and costs, field decline rates, market demand and
supply, and the economic and regulatory climates. If the carrying value exceeds
such cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the
estimated fair market value (as determined by discounted future cash flows), and
the carrying value of the assets.
The
determination of oil and natural gas reserve estimates is a subjective process,
and the accuracy of any reserve estimate depends on the quality of available
data and the application of engineering and geological interpretation and
judgment. Estimates of economically recoverable reserves and future net cash
flows depend on a number of variable factors and assumptions that are difficult
to predict and may vary considerably from actual results. In addition, reserve
estimates for wells with limited or no production history are less reliable than
those based on actual production. Estimated reserves are often
subject to future revisions, which could be substantial, based on the
availability of additional information which could cause the assumptions to be
modified. The Partnership cannot predict what reserve revisions may
be required in future periods. There were no
impairments of oil and gas properties recorded by the Partnership for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Working
Interest
The
Partnership agreement establishes that revenues and expenses will be allocated
to the MGP and limited partners based on their ratio of capital contributions to
total contributions, (“the working interest”). The MGP is also provided an
additional working interest of 7% as provided in the Partnership Agreement. Due
to the time necessary to complete drilling operations and accumulate all
drilling costs, estimated working interest percentage ownership rates are
utilized to allocate revenues and expenses until the wells are completely
drilled and turned on-line into production. Once the wells are completed, the
final working interest ownership of the partners is determined, and any
previously allocated revenues and expenses based on the estimated working
interest percentage ownership are adjusted to conform to the final working
interest percentage ownership.
9
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
In August
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting
Standards Update 2009-05, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) – Measuring Liabilities at Fair
Value (“Update 2009-05”). Update 2009-05 amends subtopic 820-10, “Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures- Overall” and provides clarification for the
fair value measurement of liabilities in circumstances where quoted prices for
an identical liability in an active market are not available. The amendments
also provide clarification for not requiring the reporting entity to include
separate inputs or adjustments to other inputs relating to the existence of a
restriction that prevents the transfer of a liability when estimating the fair
value of a liability. Additionally, these amendments clarify that
both the quoted price in an active market for an identical liability at the
measurement date and the quoted price for an identical liability when traded as
an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the
asset are required are considered Level 1 fair value measurements. These
requirements are effective for financial statements issued after the release of
Update 2009-05. The Partnership adopted the requirements on September
30, 2009 and it did not have a material impact on its financial position,
results of operations or related disclosures.
In June
2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-01, Topic 105- Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles Amendments Based on Statements of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 168- The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“Update 2009-01”). Update
2009-01 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) as the
single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. The
ASC supersedes all existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting
and reporting standards. Following the ASC, the FASB will not issue
new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging
Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards
Updates, which will serve only to update the ASC. ASC 105 is
effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. Entities are not required to include
specific references to the ASC in their financial statements and, therefore, the
Partnership has removed all previous references to FASB authoritative guidance
and describes its accounting policies using a “plain English” approach. The
Partnership adopted the requirements of Update 2009-01 to its financial
statements on September 30, 2009 and it did not have a material impact to the
Partnership’s financial statement disclosures.
In May
2009, the FASB issued ASC 855-10, Subsequent Events (“ASC
855-10”). ASC 855-10 establishes general standards of accounting for and
disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The provisions
require management of a reporting entity to evaluate events or transactions that
may occur after the balance sheet date for potential recognition or disclosure
in the financial statements and provides guidance for disclosures that an entity
should make about those events. ASC 855-10 is effective for interim or annual
financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 and shall be applied prospectively.
The Partnership adopted the requirements of this standard on June 30, 2009 and
it did not have a material impact to its financial position or results of
operations or related disclosures. The adoption of these provisions does not
change the Partnership’s current practices with respect to evaluating, recording
and disclosing subsequent events.
In April
2009, the FASB issued ASC 820-10-65-4, Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (“ASC
820-10-65-4”). ASC 820-10-65-4 applies to all fair value measurements and
provides additional clarification on estimating fair value when the market
activity for an asset has declined significantly. ASC 820-10-65-4
also require an entity to disclose a change in valuation technique and related
inputs to the valuation calculation and to quantify its effects, if practicable.
ASC 820-10-65-4 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June
15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15,
2009. The Partnership adopted the requirements of ASC 820-10-65-4 on
April 1, 2009 and its adoption did not have a material impact on the
Partnership’s financial position and results of operations.
10
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards (Continued)
In April
2009, the FASB issued ASC 825-10-65-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value
of Financial Instruments (“ASC 825-10-65-1”), which requires an entity to
provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim
financial information. In addition, an entity shall disclose in the body or in
the accompanying notes of its summarized financial information for interim
reporting periods and in its financial statements for annual reporting periods
the fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to
estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of
financial position. ASC 825-10-65-1 is effective for interim periods ending
after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after
March 15, 2009. The Partnership adopted these requirements on April
1, 2009 and its adoption did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s
financial position and results of operations.
In March
2008, the FASB issued ASC 815-10-50-1, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (“ASC 815-10-50-1”), to require
enhanced disclosure about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. The Partnership adopted the
requirements of this section of ASC 815-10-50-1 on January 1, 2009 and it did
not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations
(see Note 5).
Modernization
of Oil and Gas Reporting
In
December 2008, the SEC announced that it had approved revisions to its oil and
gas reporting disclosures by adopting amendments to Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X
and Items 201, 801, and 802 of Regulation S-K. These new disclosure requirements
are referred to as “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting” and include
provisions that:
·
|
Introduce
a new definition of oil and gas producing activities. This new definition
allows companies to include in their reserve base volumes from
unconventional resources. Such unconventional resources include bitumen
extracted from oil sands and oil and gas extracted from coal beds and
shale formations.
|
·
|
Report
oil and gas reserves using an unweighted average price using the prior
12-month period, based on the closing prices on the first day of each
month, rather than year-end pricing. This should maximize the
comparability of reserve estimates among companies and mitigate the
distortion of the estimates that arises when using a single pricing
date.
|
·
|
Permit
companies to disclose their probable and possible reserves on a voluntary
basis. Current rules limit disclosure to only proved
reserves.
|
·
|
Update
and revise reserve definitions to reflect changes in the oil and gas
industry and new technologies. New updated definitions include “by
geographic area” and “reasonable
certainty.”
|
·
|
Permit
the use of new technologies to determine proved reserves if those
technologies have been demonstrated empirically to lead to reliable
conclusions about reserves
volumes.
|
11
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Modernization
of Oil and Gas Reporting (Continued)
·
|
Require
additional disclosures regarding the qualifications of the chief technical
person who oversees the Partnership’s overall reserve estimation process.
Additionally, disclosures are required related to internal controls over
reserve estimation, as well as a report addressing the independence and
qualifications of a Partnership’s reserves preparer or auditor
based on Society of Petroleum Engineers
criteria.
|
The
Partnership will begin complying with the disclosure requirements in its annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009. The new rules
may not be applied to disclosures in quarterly reports prior to the first annual
report in which the revised disclosures are required. The Partnership is
currently in the process of evaluating the new requirements.
NOTE
3 - TRANSACTIONS WITH ATLAS RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS AFFILIATES
The
Partnership has entered into the following significant transactions with its MGP
and its affiliates as provided under its Partnership agreement:
·
|
Administrative
costs which are included in general and administrative expenses in the
Partnership’s Statements of Net Earnings are payable at $75 per well per
month. Administrative costs incurred for the three months and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 were $119,200 and $372,500, respectively.
Administrative costs incurred for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 were $122,500 and $344,500,
respectively.
|
·
|
Monthly
well supervision fees which are included in production expenses in the
Partnership’s Statements of Net Earnings are payable at $376 per well per
month in 2009 and 2008, respectively, for operating and maintaining the
wells. Well supervision fees incurred for the three months and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 were $598,400 and $1,869,800, respectively. Well
supervision fees incurred for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 were $615,000 and $1,729,500,
respectively.
|
·
|
Transportation
fees which are included in production expenses in the Partnership’s
Statements of Net Earnings are generally payable at 13% of the natural gas
sales price. Transportation fees incurred for the three months and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 were $671,300 and $2,310,000,
respectively. Transportation fees incurred for the three months and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 were $1,059,200 and $3,545,800,
respectively.
|
·
|
Assets
contributed from the MGP which are disclosed in the Partnership’s
Statements of Cash Flows as a non-cash activity for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $531,100 and $7,410,500,
respectively.
|
The MGP
and its affiliates perform all administrative and management functions for the
Partnership including billing revenues and paying expenses. “Accounts
receivable-affiliate” on the Partnership's Balance Sheets represents the net
production revenues due from the MGP.
12
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE
3 - TRANSACTIONS WITH ATLAS RESOURCES, LLC AND ITS AFFILIATES
(Continued)
Subordination
by Managing General Partner
Under the
terms of the Partnership agreement, the MGP may be required to subordinate up to
50% of its share of net production revenues of the Partnership to provide a
distribution to the limited partners equal to at least 10% of their agreed
subscriptions. Subordination is determined on a cumulative basis, in each of the
first five years of Partnership operations, commencing with the first
distribution of net revenues to the investor partners (February 2008). For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, the MGP was required to subordinate
$1,096,300 of its net revenues of $2,192,500. Therefore MGP distributions were
decreased and the limited partners were increased by $1,096,300 as shown on the
Statement of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the nine months ended September
30, 2009.
NOTE
4 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Comprehensive
income (loss) includes net income and all other changes in equity of a business
during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from
non-owner sources. These changes, other than net income, are referred to as
"other comprehensive income (loss)" and, for the Partnership, include changes in
the fair value of unsettled derivative contracts accounted for as cash flow
hedges. A reconciliation of the Partnership’s comprehensive income (loss) for
the periods indicated is as follows:
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 204,700 | $ | 2,711,900 | $ | 2,166,400 | $ | 6,917,300 | ||||||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gain (loss) on hedging contracts
|
1,030,300 | 35,639,000 | (1,497,400 | ) | (2,071,100 | ) | ||||||||||
Less:
reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized in net
earnings
|
(701,700 | ) | 3,086,400 | (965,700 | ) | 2,218,200 | ||||||||||
Total
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
328,600 | 38,725,400 | (2,463,100 | ) | 147,100 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
$ | 533,300 | $ | 41,437,300 | $ | (296,700 | ) | $ | 7,064,400 |
NOTE
5 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The
Partnership is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business
operations. The risk is managed by using derivative instruments related to
commodity price risk. Forward contracts on natural gas and oil are entered into
to manage the price risk associated with forecasted sales of natural gas and
crude oil. The Partnership designates these derivatives as cash flow hedges and
the derivative instruments have been recorded as either assets or liabilities at
fair value on the balance sheets. The effective portion of the gain or loss on
the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive loss and
reclassified to earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction
affects earnings. The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative
instruments as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, as well as the gain
or loss recognized for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively. There were no gains or losses recognized in income for
ineffective derivative instruments for the three months and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
13
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE
5 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value of Derivative Instruments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Asset
Derivatives
|
Liability
Derivatives
|
||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives
in
|
Fair
Value
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||||||||||
Cash
Flow Hedging
|
Balance
Sheet
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
Balance
Sheet
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||||||
Relationships
|
Location
|
2009
|
2008
|
Location
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Commodity
contracts:
|
Current
assets
|
$ | 2,334,200 | $ | 8,165,800 |
Current
liabilities
|
$ | (34,300 | ) | $ | (709,400 | ) | |||||||
Long-term
assets
|
1,658,100 | 5,253,600 |
Long-term
liabilities
|
(407,400 | ) | (638,200 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total
derivatives
|
$ | 3,992,300 | $ | 13,419,400 | $ | (441,700 | ) | $ | (1,347,600 | ) |
Effects
of Derivative Instruments on Statements of Net Earnings:
Derivatives
in
|
Gain
Recognized
in OCI on Derivative
(Effective
Portion)
Three
Months Ended
|
Location
of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified
from Accumulated
|
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified
from OCI into Income
(Effective
Portion)
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
Cash
Flow
|
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
OCI
into Income
|
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
Hedging
Relationship
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Effective
Portion)
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||
Commodity
contracts
|
$ | 1,030,300 | $ | 35,639,000 |
Natural
gas and oil revenue
|
$ | 701,700 | $ | (3,086,400 | ) |
Derivatives
in
|
Loss
Recognized
in OCI on Derivative
(Effective
Portion)
Nine
Months Ended
|
Location
of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified
from Accumulated
|
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified
from OCI into Income
(Effective
Portion)
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
Cash
Flow
|
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
OCI
into Income
|
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
Hedging
Relationship
|
2009
|
2008
|
(Effective
Portion)
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||
Commodity
contracts
|
$ | (1,497,400 | ) | $ | (2,071,100 | ) |
Natural
gas and oil revenue
|
$ | 965,700 | $ | (2,218,200 | ) |
Atlas
Energy, on behalf of the Partnership, from time to time enters into natural gas
and crude oil future option and collar contracts to hedge exposure to changes in
natural gas prices and oil prices. At any point in time, such contracts may
include regulated New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) futures, options
contracts, and non-regulated over-the-counter futures contracts with qualified
counterparties. NYMEX contracts are generally settled with offsetting positions,
but may be settled by the delivery of natural gas. Crude oil contracts are based
on a West Texas Intermediate ("WTI") index. These contracts have qualified and
been designated as cash flow hedges and recorded at their fair
values.
At
September 30, 2009, the Partnership reflected a net hedge asset on its Balance
Sheet of $3,550,600, however unrealized gains of $6,013,700 which were required
to be recognized in net income which were related to impairment charges of the
Partnership’s oil and gas properties for the year ended December 31, 2008
results in a net unrealized accumulated loss of $2,463,100. Of the remaining
$2,463,100 net unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive loss at
September 30, 2009, if the fair values of the instruments remain at current
market values, the Partnership will reclassify $1,040,100 of net losses to its
Statements of Net Earnings over the next twelve month period as these contracts
settle, and $1,423,000 of net losses in later periods. Actual amounts that will
be reclassified will vary as a result of future price changes. Ineffective hedge
gains or losses are recorded within the Statements of Net Earnings while the
hedge contract is open and may increase or decrease until settlement of the
contract. The Partnership recognized no gains or losses during the three months
and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 for hedge ineffectiveness or
as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedges.
14
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE
5 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
As of
September 30, 2009, Atlas Energy had allocated to the Partnership the following
natural gas and oil volumes hedged:
Natural
Gas Fixed Price Swaps
Production
|
Average
|
|||||||||||
Period
Ending
|
Volumes
|
Fixed
Price
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||
December
31,
|
(MMbtu)
(1)
|
(per
MMbtu) (1)
|
Asset
(2)
|
|||||||||
2009
|
287,500 | $ | 8.24 | $ | 1,006,000 | |||||||
2010
|
846,700 | 7.71 | 1,273,900 | |||||||||
2011
|
516,500 | 7.04 | 427,200 | |||||||||
2012
|
473,200 | 7.22 | 321,900 | |||||||||
2013
|
276,100 | 7.08 | 40,000 | |||||||||
$ | 3,069,000 |
Natural
Gas Costless Collars
Production
|
Average
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
Period
Ending
|
Option
|
Volumes
|
Floor
& Cap
|
Asset
|
||||||||||
December
31,
|
Type
|
(MMbtu)
(1)
|
(per
MMbtu) (1)
|
(Liability)
(2)
|
||||||||||
2009
|
Puts
purchased
|
1,600 | $ | 11.00 | $ | 10,300 | ||||||||
2009
|
Calls
sold
|
1,600 | 15.35 | — | ||||||||||
2010
|
Puts
purchased
|
88,200 | 7.84 | 160,500 | ||||||||||
2010
|
Calls
sold
|
88,200 | 9.01 | — | ||||||||||
2011
|
Puts
purchased
|
233,300 | 6.52 | 151,800 | ||||||||||
2011
|
Calls
sold
|
233,300 | 7.67 | — | ||||||||||
2012
|
Puts
purchased
|
88,800 | 6.51 | 800 | ||||||||||
2012
|
Calls
sold
|
88,800 | 7.72 | — | ||||||||||
2013
|
Puts
purchased
|
110,700 | 6.52 | — | ||||||||||
2013
|
Calls
sold
|
110,700 | 7.81 | (11,200 | ) | |||||||||
$ | 312,200 |
Crude
Oil Fixed Price Swaps
Production
|
Average
|
|||||||||||
Period
Ending
|
Volumes
|
Fixed
Price
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||||||
December
31,
|
(Bbl)
(1)
|
(per
Bbl) (1)
|
Asset
(3)
|
|||||||||
2009
|
600 | $ | 99.32 | $ | 17,900 | |||||||
2010
|
2,000 | 97.40 | 45,800 | |||||||||
2011
|
1,600 | 77.46 | 30,800 | |||||||||
2012
|
1,200 | 76.86 | 19,500 | |||||||||
2013
|
400 | 77.36 | 5,200 | |||||||||
$ | 119,200 |
15
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE
5 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
Crude
Oil Costless Collars
Production
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||
Period
Ending
|
Option
|
Volumes
|
Floor
& Cap
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||
December
31,
|
Type
|
(Bbl)
(1)
|
(per
Bbl) (1)
|
Asset
(3)
|
||||||||||
2009
|
Puts
purchased
|
400 | $ | 85.00 | $ | 5,600 | ||||||||
2009
|
Calls
sold
|
400 | 116.56 | — | ||||||||||
2010
|
Puts
purchased
|
1,300 | 85.00 | 18,900 | ||||||||||
2010
|
Calls
sold
|
1,300 | 112.92 | — | ||||||||||
2011
|
Puts
purchased
|
1,000 | 67.22 | 14,100 | ||||||||||
2011
|
Calls
sold
|
1,000 | 89.44 | — | ||||||||||
2012
|
Puts
purchased
|
800 | 65.51 | 9,300 | ||||||||||
2012
|
Calls
sold
|
800 | 91.45 | — | ||||||||||
2013
|
Puts
purchased
|
200 | 65.36 | 2,300 | ||||||||||
2013
|
Calls
sold
|
200 | 93.44 | — | ||||||||||
$ | 50,200 | |||||||||||||
Total
Net Asset
|
$ | 3,550,600 |
_____________
(1)
|
MMBTU
represents million British Thermal Units. Bbl represents
barrels.
|
(2)
|
Fair
value based on forward NYMEX natural gas
prices.
|
(3)
|
Fair
value based on forward WTI crude oil
prices.
|
NOTE
6 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The
Partnership has established a hierarchy to measure its financial instruments at
fair value which requires it to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The hierarchy
defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair
value.
Level 1– Quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity
has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2– Inputs other than
quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset and
liability or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially
the entire contractual term of the asset or liability.
Level 3– Unobservable inputs
that reflect the entities own assumptions about the assumptions that market
participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are
consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular
valuation techniques.
16
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE
6 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The
Partnership has certain assets and liabilities that are reported at fair value
on a recurring basis in its balance sheets. The following methods and
assumptions were used to estimate fair values.
All of
the Partnership’s derivatives contracts are defined as Level 2. The
Partnership's natural gas and crude oil derivative contracts are valued based on
prices quoted on the NYMEX or WTI and adjusted by the respective counterparty
using various assumptions including quoted forward prices, time value,
volatility factors, and contractual prices for the underlying instruments.
Information for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is as follows.
September
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Level
2
|
Total
|
Level
2
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Commodity-based
derivatives
|
$ | 3,550,600 | $ | 3,550,600 | $ | 12,071,800 | $ | 12,071,800 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 3,550,600 | $ | 3,550,600 | $ | 12,071,800 | $ | 12,071,800 |
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The
Partnership has certain assets and liabilities that are reported at fair value
on a nonrecurring basis in its Balance Sheets. The following methods and
assumptions were used to estimate fair values.
Asset Retirement
Obligations. The Partnership estimates the fair value of asset
retirement obligations based on discounted cash flow projections using numerous
estimates, assumptions and judgments regarding such factors at the date of
establishment of an asset retirement obligation such as: amounts and timing of
settlements; the credit adjusted risk free rate of the Partnership; and
estimated inflation rates. There were no new asset retirement obligations
incurred for the three months and nine months ended September
30, 2009.
NOTE
7 - ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION
The
Partnership recognizes an estimated liability for the plugging and abandonment
of its oil and gas wells and related facilities. It also recognizes a liability
for future asset retirement obligations if a reasonable estimate of the fair
value of that liability can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are
capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The
Partnership also considers the estimated salvage value in the calculation of
depreciation, depletion and amortization.
The
estimated liability is based on historical experience in plugging and abandoning
wells, estimated remaining lives of those wells based on reserve estimates,
external estimates as to the cost to plug and abandon the wells in the future,
and federal and state regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using
an assumed credit- adjusted risk-free
interest rate. Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in
estimates of plugging and abandonment costs or remaining lives of the wells, or
if federal or state regulators enact new plugging and abandonment
requirements.
17
ATLAS
RESOURCES PUBLIC 16-2007 (A) L.P.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE
7 - ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION (Continued)
The
Partnership has no assets legally restricted for purposes of settling asset
retirement obligations. Except for its oil and gas properties, the
Partnership has determined that there are no other material retirement
obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets.
A
reconciliation of the Partnership’s liability for plugging and abandonment costs
for the periods indicated is as follows:
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Asset
retirement obligation at beginning of period
|
$ | 5,879,600 | $ | 3,584,800 | $ | 5,708,300 | $ | 3,480,400 | ||||||||
Accretion
expense
|
85,600 | 52,200 | 256,900 | 156,600 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities
settled
|
(15,300 | ) | — | (15,300 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Asset
retirement obligation at end of period
|
$ | 5,949,900 | $ | 3,637,000 | $ | 5,949,900 | $ | 3,637,000 |
NOTE
8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The
Managing General Partner is not aware of any legal proceedings filed against the
Partnership.
Affiliates
of the MGP and their subsidiaries are party to various routine legal proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of their collective business. The MGP management
believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have
a material adverse effect on the MGP's financial condition or results of
operations.
ITEM
2.
|
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
The
matters discussed within this report include forward-looking statements. These
statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
“anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,”
“may,” “might,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “should,” or “will,” or the
negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. In
particular, statements about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives,
assumptions or future events or performance contained in this report are
forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on
our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections. While we
believe these expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections are
reasonable, such forward-looking statements are only predictions and involve
known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control.
These and other important factors may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements.
18
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with our Financial
Statements and the Notes to our Financial Statements.
General
We were
formed as a Delaware limited partnership on September 15, 2006, with Atlas
Resources, LLC as our Managing General Partner, or MGP, to drill natural gas
development wells. We have no employees and rely on our MGP for management,
which in turn relies on its parent company, Atlas Energy Resources, LLC
(NYSE:ATN), or Atlas Energy, for administrative services. On September 29, 2009
Atlas Energy completed its merger with Atlas America, Inc. (NASDAQ:ATLS). In
addition, Atlas America changed its name to Atlas Energy, Inc.
Our wells
are currently producing natural gas and, to a far lesser extent, oil which are
our only products. Most of our gas is gathered and delivered to market through
Laurel Mountain Midstream, LLC’s gas gathering system, a newly formed
joint-venture between Atlas Energy’s affiliate, Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P.
(NYSE:APL) and The Williams Companies (NYSE:WMB). We do not plan to sell any of
our wells and will continue to produce them until they are depleted or become
uneconomical to produce, at which time they will be plugged and abandoned or
sold.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth information relating to our production revenues,
volumes, sales prices, production costs and depletion during the periods
indicated:
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Production
revenues (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||
Gas
|
$ | 3,842 | $ | 9,488 | $ | 14,116 | $ | 32,300 | ||||||||
Oil
|
233 | 365 | 393 | 2,252 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 4,075 | $ | 9,853 | $ | 14,509 | $ | 34,522 | ||||||||
Production
volumes:
|
||||||||||||||||
Gas
(mcf/day) (1)
|
6,894 | 10,550 | 8,398 | 12,978 | ||||||||||||
Oil
(bbls/day) (1)
|
70 | 32 | 39 | 88 | ||||||||||||
Total
(mcfe/day) (1)
|
7,314 | 10,742 | 8,632 | 13,506 | ||||||||||||
Average
sales prices: (2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Gas
(per mcf) (1)
(3)
|
$ | 8.87 | $ | 9.78 | $ | 8.69 | $ | 9.08 | ||||||||
Oil
(per bbl) (1)
(4)
|
$ | 48.02 | $ | 125.22 | $ | 60.65 | $ | 93.74 | ||||||||
Average
production costs:
|
||||||||||||||||
As
a percent of revenues
|
50 | % | 16 | % | 42 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||
Per
mcfe (1)
|
$ | 3.05 | $ | 1.58 | $ | 2.60 | $ | 2.04 | ||||||||
Depletion
per mcfe
|
$ | 2.34 | $ | 5.44 | $ | 2.34 | $ | 5.25 |
__________
(1)
|
“Mcf”
means thousand cubic feet, “mcfe” means thousand cubic feet equivalent and
“bbls” means barrels. Bbls are converted to mcfe using the ratio of six
mcfs to one bbl.
|
(2)
|
Average
sales prices represent accrual basis pricing after reversing the effect of
previously recognized gains resulting from prior period impairment
charges.
|
(3)
|
Average
gas prices are calculated by including in total revenue derivative gains
previously recognized into income and dividing by the total volume for the
period. Previously recognized derivative gains were $1,787,000 and
$5,812,500 for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively. The derivative gains are included in other comprehensive
income and resulted from prior period impairment
charges.
|
(4)
|
Average
oil prices are calculated by including in total revenue derivative gains
previously recognized into income and dividing by the total volume for the
period. Previously recognized derivative gains were $77,100 and $245,600
for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively. The derivative gains are included in other comprehensive
income and resulted from prior period impairment
charges.
|
19
Natural Gas
Revenues. Our natural gas revenues were $3,842,100 and
$9,487,900 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
a decrease of $5,645,800 (60%). The $5,645,800 decrease in natural gas revenues
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the prior year
similar period was attributable to a $3,287,400 decrease in natural gas
production volumes and a $2,358,400 decrease in natural gas sales prices after
the effect of financial hedges. Our production volumes decreased to 6,894 mcf
per day for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 10,550 mcf per day
for the three months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of 3,656 mcf per day
(35%). The overall decrease in natural gas production volumes for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 resulted primarily from the normal decline
inherent in the life of the well.
Our
natural gas revenues were $14,116,400 and $32,299,900 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of $18,183,500 (56%). The
$18,183,500 decrease in natural gas revenues for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 as compared to the prior year similar period was attributable to a
$11,474,300 decrease in natural gas production volumes and a $6,709,200 decrease
in natural gas sales prices after the effect of financial hedges. Our production
volumes decreased to 8,398 mcf per day for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 from 12,978 mcf per day for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a
decrease of 4,580 mcf per day (35%). The overall decrease in natural gas
production volumes for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 resulted
primarily from the normal decline inherent in the life of the well.
Oil Revenues. We drill wells
primarily to produce natural gas, rather than oil, but some wells have limited
oil production. Our oil revenues were $233,500 and $364,700 for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of $131,200 (36%).
The $131,200 decrease in oil revenues for the three months ended September 30,
2009 as compared to the prior year similar period was attributable to a $576,100
decrease in oil prices, partially offset by a $444,900 increase in production
volumes. Our production volumes increased to 70 bbls per day for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 from 32 bbls per day for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, an increase of 38 bbl per day (119%).
Our oil
revenues were $393,300 and $2,252,500 for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively, a decrease of $1,859,200 (83%). The $1,859,200
decrease in oil revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as
compared to the prior year similar period was attributable to a $1,263,400
decrease in production volumes and a $595,800 decrease in oil prices. Our
production volumes decreased to 39 bbls per day for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 from 88 bbls per day for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, a decrease of 49 bbls per day (56%).
Expenses. Production
expenses were $2,051,100 and $1,561,300 for the three months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively, an increase of $489,800 (31%). Production expenses
were $6,117,000 and $7,547,800 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively, a decrease of $1,430,800 (19%). These changes were primarily
attributable to changes in transportation fees and well supervision fees as
compared to the prior year similar period.
Depletion
of oil and gas properties as a percentage of oil and gas revenues were 39% and
55% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Depletion of oil and gas properties as a percentage of oil and gas revenues were
38% and 56% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
These percentage changes are directly attributable to changes in revenues, oil
and gas reserve quantities, product prices, production volumes and changes in
the depletable cost basis of oil and gas properties.
General
and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, were $159,800 and $160,000, respectively, a decrease of $200 (.1%). For
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 these expenses were $459,800
and $505,500, respectively, a decrease of $45,700 (9%). These expenses include
third-party costs for services as well as the monthly administrative fees
charged by our MGP and vary from period to period due to the timing and billing
of the costs and services provided to the Partnership.
20
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
provided by operating activities decreased $7,095,400 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 to $17,991,700 as compared to $25,087,100 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. This decrease was due to a decrease in net earnings
before depletion and accretion of $18,579,300 and $15,300 in plugging costs.
This decrease was partially offset by the change in accounts
receivable-affiliate increasing operating cash flows by $5,401,900 in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the nine months ended September
30, 2008, in addition by an increase in a non-cash loss on derivative value of
$6,058,100.
Cash
provided from investing activities was $13,500 from the sale of tangible
equipment.
Cash used
in financing activities decreased by $4,480,300 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 to $19,229,500, from $23,709,800 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. This decrease was due to a decrease in cash distributions to
partners.
Our MGP
may withhold funds for future plugging and abandonment costs. Any additional
funds, if required, will be obtained from production revenues or borrowings from
our MGP or its affiliates, which are not contractually committed to make loans
to us. The amount that we may borrow may not at any time exceed 5% of our total
subscriptions, and we will not borrow from third-parties.
The
Partnership is generally limited to the amount of funds generated by the cash
flows from our operations, which we believe is adequate to fund future
operations and distributions to our partners. Historically, there has
been no need to borrow funds from our MGP to fund operations.
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. On an
on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to our asset
retirement obligations, depletion and certain accrued receivables and
liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that we believe reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets
and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A
discussion of our significant accounting policies we have adopted and followed
in the preparation of our financial statements is included within “Notes to
Financial Statements” in Part I, Item 1, “Financial Statements” in this
quarterly report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Subordination
by Managing General Partner
Under the
terms of the Partnership agreement, the MGP may be required to subordinate up to
50% of its share of net production revenues of the Partnership to provide a
distribution to the limited partners equal to at least 10% of their agreed
subscriptions. Subordination is determined on a cumulative basis, in each of the
first five years of Partnership operations, commencing with the first
distribution of net revenues to the investor partners (February 2008). For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, we were required to subordinate $1,096,300
of our net revenues of $2,192,500. Therefore MGP distributions were decreased
and the limited partners were increased by $1,096,300 as shown on the Statement
of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the nine months ended September 30,
2009.
21
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
In August
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update 2009-05, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) – Measuring Liabilities at Fair
Value an Update 2009-05. Update 2009-05 amends subtopic 820-10, “Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures- Overall” and provides clarification for the
fair value measurement of liabilities in circumstances where quoted prices for
an identical liability in an active market are not available. The amendments
also provide clarification for not requiring the reporting entity to include
separate inputs or adjustments to other inputs relating to the existence of a
restriction that prevents the transfer of a liability when estimating the fair
value of a liability. Additionally, these amendments clarify that both the
quoted price in an active market for an identical liability at the measurement
date and the quoted price for an identical liability when traded as an asset in
an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are
required are considered Level 1 fair value measurements. These requirements are
effective for financial statements issued after the release of Update 2009-05.
We adopted the requirements on September 30, 2009 and it did not have a material
impact on our financial position, results of operations or related
disclosures.
In June
2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-01, Topic 105- Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles Amendments Based on Statements of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 168- The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles an Update 2009-01. Update
2009-01 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification or ASC as the
single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. The ASC
supersedes all existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and
reporting standards. Following the ASC, the FASB will not issue new
standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues
Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates,
which will serve only to update the ASC. ASC 105 is effective for financial
statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. Entities are not required to include specific references to the ASC in
their financial statements and, therefore, we have removed all previous
references to FASB authoritative guidance and describes our accounting policies
using a “plain English” approach. We adopted the requirements of Update 2009-01
to our financial statements on September 30, 2009 and it did not have a material
impact to our financial statement disclosures.
In May
2009, the FASB issued ASC 855-10, Subsequent Events or ASC
855-10. ASC 855-10 establishes general standards of accounting for
and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The provisions
require management of a reporting entity to evaluate events or transactions that
may occur after the balance sheet date for potential recognition or disclosure
in the financial statements and provides guidance for disclosures that an entity
should make about those events. ASC 855-10 is effective for interim or annual
financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 and shall be applied
prospectively. We adopted the requirements of this standard on June
30, 2009 and it did not have a material impact to our financial position or
results of operations or related disclosures. The adoption of these provisions
does not change our current practices with respect to evaluating, recording and
disclosing subsequent events.
In April
2009, the FASB issued ASC 820-10-65-4, Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly or ASC
820-10-65-4. ASC 820-10-65-4 applies to all fair value measurements and provides
additional clarification on estimating fair value when the market activity for
an asset has declined significantly. ASC 820-10-65-4 also require an entity to
disclose a change in valuation technique and related inputs to the valuation
calculation and to quantify its effects, if practicable. ASC 820-10-65-4 is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early
adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We adopted the
requirements of ASC 820-10-65-4 on April 1, 2009 and its adoption did not have a
material impact on our financial position and results of
operations.
22
In April
2009, the FASB issued ASC 825-10-65-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value
of Financial Instruments or ASC 825-10-65-1, which requires an entity to
provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim
financial information. In addition, an entity shall disclose in the body or in
the accompanying notes of its summarized financial information for interim
reporting periods and in its financial statements for annual reporting periods
the fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to
estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of
financial position. ASC 825-10-65-1 is effective for interim periods ending
after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after
March 15, 2009. We adopted these requirements on April 1, 2009 and
its adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position and
results of operations.
In March
2008, the FASB issued ASC 815-10-50-1, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities or ASC 815-10-50-1, to require
enhanced disclosure about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. We adopted the requirements of
this section of ASC 815-10-50-1 on January 1, 2009 and it did not have a
material impact on our financial position or results of operations (see Note
5).
Modernization
of Oil and Gas Reporting
In
December 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission or SEC announced that it
had approved revisions to its oil and gas reporting disclosures by adopting
amendments to Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X and Items 201, 801, and 802 of
Regulation S-K. These new disclosure requirements are referred to as
“Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting” and include provisions
that:
·
|
Introduce
a new definition of oil and gas producing activities. This new definition
allows companies to include in their reserve base volumes from
unconventional resources. Such unconventional resources include bitumen
extracted from oil sands and oil and gas extracted from coal beds and
shale formations.
|
·
|
Report
oil and gas reserves using an unweighted average price using the prior
12-month period, based on the closing prices on the first day of each
month, rather than year-end pricing. This should maximize the
comparability of reserve estimates among companies and mitigate the
distortion of the estimates that arises when using a single pricing
date.
|
·
|
Permit
companies to disclose their probable and possible reserves on a voluntary
basis. Current rules limit disclosure to only proved
reserves.
|
·
|
Update
and revise reserve definitions to reflect changes in the oil and gas
industry and new technologies. New updated definitions include “by
geographic area” and “reasonable
certainty.”
|
·
|
Permit
the use of new technologies to determine proved reserves if those
technologies have been demonstrated empirically to lead to reliable
conclusions about reserves volumes.
|
·
|
Require
additional disclosures regarding the qualifications of the chief technical
person who oversees the Partnership’s overall reserve estimation process.
Additionally, disclosures are required related to internal controls over
reserve estimation, as well as a report addressing the independence and
qualifications of a Partnership’s reserves preparer or auditor based on
Society of Petroleum Engineers
criteria.
|
We will
begin complying with the disclosure requirements in its annual report on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009. The new rules may not be applied to
disclosures in quarterly reports prior to the first annual report in which the
revised disclosures are required. We are currently in the process of evaluating
the new requirements.
23
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The
Partnership maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934 reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the MGP’s management, including the chief
executive officer and the chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the
disclosure controls and procedures, the MGP’s management recognized that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and the
MGP’s management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating
the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Under the
supervision of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, the MGP
has carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Partnership’s
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief
financial officer concluded that the Partnership’s disclosure controls and
procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level at September 30,
2009.
There
have been no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial
reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially effect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART
II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
4.0
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership for Public
16-2007 (A) L.P. (1)
|
|
10.1
|
Drilling
and Operating Agreement for Atlas America Public 16-2007 (A) L.P. (1)
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14/15(d)-14
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14/15(d)-14
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley
|
|
Act
of 2002
|
||
32.2
|
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley
|
|
Act
of 2002
|
____________
(1)
|
Filed
on October 18, 2006 in the Form S-1 Registration Statement dated October
18, 2006, File No. 333-138068
|
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities of the Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
||
Atlas
Resources Public 16-2007 (A) L.P.
|
||
Atlas
Resources, LLC, Managing General Partner
|
||
Date: November
16, 2009
|
By:/s/ Freddie M.
Kotek
|
|
Freddie
M. Kotek, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive
Officer
|
||
and
President
|
||
In
accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
|
||
Date: November
16, 2009
|
By:/s/ Freddie M.
Kotek
|
|
Freddie
M. Kotek, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief
Executive
|
||
Officer
and President
|
||
Date: November
16, 2009
|
By:/s/ Matthew A.
Jones
|
|
Matthew
A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer
|
||
Date: November
16, 2009
|
By:/s/ Sean P.
McGrath
|
|
Sean
P. McGrath, Chief Accounting Officer
|
||
25