As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 20, 2009
Registration
No. 333-160986
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Amendment No. 3
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
ANCESTRY.COM INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
7379
|
|
26-1235962
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
360 West 4800 North
Provo, UT 84604
(801) 705-7000
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
Timothy Sullivan
Chief Executive Officer
360 West 4800 North
Provo, UT 84604
(801) 705-7000
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Barbara L. Becker
Stewart L. McDowell
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Tel: (212) 351-4000
Fax: (212) 351-4035
|
|
Jeffrey D. Saper
Robert G. Day
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Tel: (650) 493-9300
Fax: (650) 565-5147
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this
registration statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check
the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Amount to be
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Registered(1)
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering Price(2)
|
|
|
Registration Fee(3)
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
|
8,518,518
|
|
|
$123,518,511
|
|
|
$6,892.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes 1,111,111 shares that the underwriters have the
option to purchase to cover overallotments, if any.
|
|
|
(2) |
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration
fee in accordance with Rule 457(a) under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended.
|
|
|
(3) |
A filing fee of $4,185 was previously paid in connection with
the initial filing of this Registration Statement on
August 3, 2009. The aggregate filing fee of $6,892.33 is
being offset by the $4,185 previously paid.
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission
acting pursuant to such Section 8(a) may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We and the selling stockholders may not sell these
securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus
is not an offer to sell these securities and we and the selling
stockholders are not soliciting offers to buy these securities
in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
PROSPECTUS
(Subject to Completion)
Issued
October 20, 2009
7,407,407 Shares
COMMON STOCK
Ancestry.com Inc. is offering 4,074,074 shares of its
common stock and the selling stockholders are offering
3,333,333 shares of common stock. We will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders.
This is our initial public offering and no public market
currently exists for our shares. We anticipate that the initial
public offering price of our common stock will be between $12.50
and $14.50 per share.
We have applied to list our common stock on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market under the symbol ACOM.
Investing in the common stock involves risks. See
Risk Factors beginning on page 13.
PRICE $ A SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price to
|
|
Discounts and
|
|
Proceeds to
|
|
Proceeds to Selling
|
|
|
Public
|
|
Commissions
|
|
Company
|
|
Stockholders
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
Ancestry.com Inc. has granted the underwriters the right to
purchase up to an additional 611,112 shares of common stock
to cover over-allotments and the selling stockholders have
granted the underwriters the right to purchase up to an
additional 499,999 shares of common stock to cover
over-allotments.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities
regulators have not approved or disapproved these securities, or
determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares of common stock
to purchasers on ,
2009.
|
|
MORGAN
STANLEY |
BofA MERRILL LYNCH |
|
|
|
JEFFERIES &
COMPANY |
PIPER JAFFRAY |
BMO CAPITAL MARKETS |
,
2009
87% of Americans have an interest in their family history.* Every month, millions turn to
Ancestry.com® for answers.** Ancestry.com is the worlds largest online collection of family
history resources including records, photos, stories, family trees and a collaborative community
of over a million subscribers worldwide. Our mission is to help everyone discover, preserve and
share their family history. * Based on a survey commissioned by Ancestry.com and conducted by
Harris Interactive July 15-17, 2009 via its QuickQuery online omnibus service interviewing a
nationwide sample of 2,066 U.S. adults aged 18+, of which 87% indicated that they were either very
interested (33%), interested (28%) or somewhat interested (26%) in learning about their
familys history. Results were weighted as needed for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, region,
and household income. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for respondents
propensity to be online. ** comScore, 2009 ©2009 Ancestry.com |
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus or in any free-writing prospectus we may authorize to
be delivered or made available to you. We have not, the selling
stockholders have not and the underwriters have not authorized
anyone to provide you with additional or different information.
We and the selling stockholders are offering to sell, and
seeking offers to buy, shares of our common stock only in
jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The
information in this prospectus or any free-writing prospectus is
accurate only as of its date, regardless of its time of delivery
or of any sale of shares of our common stock. Our business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects may
have changed since that date.
Until ,
2009 (25 days after the commencement of this offering), all
dealers that buy, sell or trade shares of our common stock,
whether or not participating in this offering, may be required
to deliver a prospectus. This delivery requirement is in
addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus
when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold
allotments or subscriptions.
For investors outside the United States: We have not, the
selling stockholders have not and the underwriters have not done
anything that would permit this offering, or possession or
distribution of this prospectus, in any jurisdiction where
action for that purpose is required, other than in the United
States. Persons outside the United States who come into
possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and
observe any restrictions relating to, the offering of the shares
of common stock and the distribution of this prospectus outside
of the United States.
i
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that
you should consider in making your investment decision. Before
investing in our common stock, you should carefully read this
entire prospectus, including our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes and the information set forth
under the headings Risk Factors and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, in each case included
elsewhere in this prospectus. All information in this prospectus
has been adjusted to give effect to a 1-for-2 reverse stock
split of our common stock that will be effective immediately
prior to the consummation of the offering.
ANCESTRY.COM
INC.
Mission
Ancestry.coms mission is to help everyone discover,
preserve and share their family history.
Overview
Ancestry.com is the worlds largest online resource for
family history, with more than one million paying subscribers
around the world as of September 30, 2009. We have been a
leader in the family history market for over 20 years and
have helped pioneer the market for online family history
research. We believe that most people have a fundamental desire
to understand who they are and from where they came, and that
anyone interested in discovering, preserving and sharing their
family history is a potential user of Ancestry.com. We strive to
make our service valuable to individuals ranging from the most
committed family historians to those taking their first steps
towards satisfying their curiosity about their family stories.
The foundation of our service is an extensive and unique
collection of billions of historical records that we have
digitized, indexed and put online over the past 12 years.
We have developed efficient and proprietary systems for
digitizing handwritten historical documents, and have
established relationships with national, state and local
government archives, historical societies, religious
institutions and private collectors of historical content around
the world. These digital records and documents, combined with
our proprietary online search technologies and tools, enable our
subscribers to research their family history, build their family
trees and make meaningful discoveries about the lives of their
ancestors.
We have built the worlds largest online community of
people interested in their family histories, and we believe that
this network is highly valuable to our subscribers. Our
community is a large and growing source of user-generated
content uniquely focused on family history. Over the past three
years, our registered users have created over 12 million
family trees containing more than 1.25 billion profiles.
They have uploaded and attached to their trees over
26 million photographs, scanned documents, written stories
and audio clips. This growing pool of user-generated content
adds color and context to the family histories assembled from
the digitized historical documents found on Ancestry.com. Our
subscribers also have attached to their trees over
333 million records from our company-acquired content
collection, a process that is helping further organize this
collection by associating specific records with people in family
trees.
In addition, we are deploying tools and technologies to
facilitate social networking and crowd sourcing, a means of
leveraging collaborative efforts. These tools and technologies
are intended to provide our subscribers with an expanding family
history collaboration network in which insights and discoveries
are shared by relatives, distant and close. Our service also
provides a platform from which our subscribers can share their
stories. Subscribers can invite family and friends to help build
their family trees, add personal memories and upload photographs
and stories of their own.
We provide ongoing value to our subscribers by regularly adding
new historical content, enhancing our websites with new tools
and features and enabling greater collaboration among our users
through the growth of our global community. Our plan to achieve
long-term and sustainable growth is to increase our subscriber
base in the United States and around the world by serving our
loyal base of existing subscribers and by attracting new
1
subscribers. Our revenues have increased from
$122.6 million in 2004 to $197.6 million in 2008, a
compound annual growth rate of 12.7%.
Industry
Background
Societies around the world have historically documented the
names, dates and places associated with important events of
their citizenry. However, due to the vast, dispersed and
disorganized nature of these data collections, the process of
researching family history generally has been time consuming,
painstaking and expensive. The introduction of web-based
technologies greatly enhances opportunities to make family
history research easier, but businesses attempting to leverage
the Internet must tailor their products and services to address
the distinctive challenges of family history research.
The
Ancestry.com Solution
Through the design and development of a unique consumer Internet
application and underlying proprietary technologies, substantial
investment in content and the aggregation of network scale, we
are revolutionizing how people discover, preserve and share
their family history. Our solution includes:
Consumer
Benefits
Easy-to-use
website. Our technology platform makes family
history research and networking easier, more enjoyable and more
rewarding. We seek to make Ancestry.com relevant and easy to use
for both new and experienced subscribers, and we continue to
advance our online tools to help our subscribers efficiently
search our content, organize their research, collaborate with
others and share their stories.
Easy access to comprehensive data sources. We
have aggregated and organized a comprehensive collection of
historical records, with a particular emphasis on records from
the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada. Our
technologies allow subscribers to locate relevant family history
records quickly and easily, resulting in a rewarding experience
for new subscribers and experienced family historians alike.
Subscribers input information that they know about their
relatives, however limited, and can immediately view the vast
content sources available to populate their family trees. Our
proprietary record hinting technology suggests content to our
subscribers, alerting them through hints delivered
online and by email of potential matches to further populate
their trees from our company-acquired and user-generated content.
Valuable community. Our community of family
history enthusiasts is a significant component of our
subscription value proposition. Our subscribers can collaborate,
contribute content and assist each other with family history
research. The publicly available family trees created by our
registered users can provide new subscribers with a substantial
head start researching their families and the opportunity to
connect with relatives interested and engaged in the discovery
and preservation of a shared family lineage.
Competitive
Advantages
Proprietary technology platform provides robust search
capability and ease of use. We have built a
scalable, proprietary technology platform. Our search technology
is designed to deal with the inherent difficulties of searching
historical content. Our record hinting technology locates and
pushes relevant content to our registered users. Our
digitization and indexing processes streamline the complex and
time-consuming task of putting historical records online.
Extensive and accessible content
collection. We have digitized and indexed the
largest online collection of family history records in the
world, with collections from the United States, the United
Kingdom, Australia and Canada, as well as Germany, France,
Italy, Sweden and China. We have invested approximately
$80 million to date in making this content available to
subscribers and continue to invest a substantial amount of time
and money to acquire or license, digitize, index and publish
additional records for our subscribers. In total, our
collections represent over four billion records and an estimated
eight billion names.
Community of dedicated and highly engaged subscribers
enhances our value proposition. We have an active
and dedicated community of subscribers, approximately 43% of
whom have been subscribers for more
2
than two years as of September 30, 2009. In the eight
months ended August 2009, visitors to our websites spent an
average of 18.8 minutes on our websites per usage day,
according to monthly data from comScore. We believe our online
community is highly valuable to our subscribers, because the
ever expanding pool of user-generated content and collaboration
and sharing opportunities can significantly enhance the family
history research process.
Growth
Strategy
Our goal is to remain the leading online resource for family
history and to grow our subscriber base in the United States and
around the world by offering a superior value proposition to
anyone interested in learning more about their family history.
We will focus on retaining our loyal base of existing
subscribers, on acquiring new subscribers and on expanding the
market to new consumers. In pursuit of these goals, we will
continue to focus on the following objectives:
Continue to build our premium brand and drive category
awareness. Over the past three years, we have
expanded and improved our consumer marketing activities in the
United States, which we believe has substantially increased our
brand awareness. We believe that continued investments in
consumer marketing and promotion will allow us to enhance our
premium brand, increase awareness of the family history category
and enhance our ability to acquire new subscribers.
Further improve our product and user
experience. We believe that investments in our
product platform can make family history research easier, more
enjoyable and more accessible. We continuously seek to advance
and improve our core search and hinting technologies, our
document image viewer, our family tree building and viewing
experience and our sharing and publishing capabilities. We
believe that we can leverage the latest web technologies to
further transform the way people discover family history online.
Regularly add new content. A vast universe of
historical records around the world is yet to be digitized, and
we intend to continue to expand our collection of digital
historical records. We will seek to maintain and extend our
existing relationships with archives and other holders of
content throughout the world and to find new sources of unique
family history content. We also plan to continue to promote the
growth of user-generated content by making the Ancestry.com
websites even better places to upload and share personal family
history documents and memories.
Enhance our collaboration technologies. With
more than one million subscribers around the world as of
September 30, 2009, we believe that we have the scale to
further expand our unique family history collaboration network
and to help relatives share insights and discoveries about
common ancestors. We believe that collaboration is a fundamental
part of family history research and that social networking
technologies applied to family history research can provide our
subscribers with even greater value. We intend to make family
history research more collaborative and appealing to a larger
market.
Grow our business internationally. We believe
that our business model of digitizing historical content and
making records available online has appeal in multiple markets
around the world, and we will seek to implement this model in
other international markets. In the third quarter of 2009, we
launched an initial version of Mundia.com, a lower-priced family
history networking product intended for markets where we do not
have a presence.
Risks
Associated with Our Business
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, as
discussed more fully in the section entitled Risk
Factors immediately following this prospectus summary. We
generate substantially all of our revenues from subscriptions to
our products and services, and if our efforts to satisfy, retain
and attract subscribers are not successful, we may experience
higher rates of monthly subscriber churn and our revenues and
profitability could be adversely affected. We face competition
from a number of sources, some of which provide access to
records free of charge. Because of our dependence on family
history products and services for substantially all of our
revenues, factors such as changes in consumer preferences for
our products and challenges in acquiring and making available
online historical content may have a disproportionately greater
impact on us than if we offered multiple products
3
and services. Our attempts to grow internationally may prove
difficult due to, among other things, legislation in various
jurisdictions, cultural impediments, and costs and difficulties
associated with acquiring relevant content. Additionally, our
recent revenue growth may not be sustainable.
The
Spectrum Investment
We operated as The Generations Network, Inc., which we refer to
as the predecessor, until December 5, 2007. On
December 5, 2007, Generations Holding, Inc., which we refer
to as the successor, acquired The Generations Network, Inc. in
connection with an investment by Spectrum Equity
Investors V, L.P. and certain of its affiliates, which we
refer to collectively as Spectrum. The successor was created for
the sole purpose of acquiring the predecessor and had no prior
operations.
The total purchase price for this transaction, which we refer to
as the Spectrum investment, was $354.8 million, at an
effective per share price of $5.40. The total purchase price
consisted of $249.1 million of cash, $95.7 million in
value of previously owned stock of predecessor,
$8.2 million of stock option fair value assumed by the
successor and $1.8 million of transaction related expenses.
The cash consisted of approximately $100 million invested
by Spectrum, $9.8 million invested by other shareholders
and $140 million of borrowings under the term loan portion
of our credit facility. Spectrum invested equity of our
predecessor with an aggregate value of $38.6 million.
Spectrum and certain of its affiliates currently hold
approximately 67% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
The remaining approximately 33% of our currently outstanding
shares of common stock is primarily held by a variety of
corporate and individual investors and employees, including
affiliates of Crosslink Capital, Inc., W Capital Partners II,
L.P., the JLS Revocable Trust and Timothy Sullivan, our
president and chief executive officer, who obtained their shares
of our common stock in connection with the Spectrum investment
by contributing equity valued at an aggregate amount of
$57.1 million or investing cash in the aggregate amount of
$9.8 million. A small percentage of our outstanding common
stock is also held by current or former employees who exercised
stock options. See Related Party Transactions for
further information about the terms of the Spectrum investment.
As a result of the accounting for the Spectrum investment, our
fiscal year 2007 is divided into a predecessor period from
January 1, 2007 through December 5, 2007 and a
successor period from December 6, 2007 through
December 31, 2007.
Corporate
Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 360 West
4800 North, Provo, UT 84604, and our telephone number at that
address is
(801) 705-7000.
Our corporate website address is www.ancestry.com. We do
not incorporate the information contained on, or accessible
through, our corporate website into this prospectus, and you
should not consider it part of this prospectus. We were
originally incorporated in Utah in 1983 under the name Ancestry,
Inc. We changed our name to Ancestry.com, Inc. in July 1998 and
reincorporated in Delaware in November 1998. Our name was
subsequently changed to MyFamily.com, Inc. in November 1999, and
then to The Generations Network, Inc. in November 2006.
In July 2009, to better align our corporate identity with the
premier branding of Ancestry.com, we changed our name to
Ancestry.com Inc. References herein to Ancestry.com,
the company, we, our and
us refer to the operations of Ancestry.com Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries in both the predecessor and
successor periods, unless otherwise specified. We are a holding
company, and substantially all of our operations are conducted
by our wholly-owned subsidiary Ancestry.com Operations Inc.,
which we refer to as the operating company, and its
subsidiaries. Our operations consist primarily of our flagship
website Ancestry.com, which is a part of a global family of
websites that includes Ancestry.co.uk, Ancestry.com.au,
Ancestry.ca, Ancestry.de, Ancestry.fr, Ancestry.it and
Ancestry.se. We refer to these websites collectively as the
Ancestry.com websites.
4
Terminology
In this prospectus we use the terms subscriber, registered user,
record, database and title.
A subscriber is an individual who pays for renewable access to
one of our Ancestry.com websites, and a registered user is a
person who has registered on one of our Ancestry.com websites,
including subscribers.
We use the term record in different ways depending
on the content source. When referring to a number of records in
certain of our company-acquired content collections, such as a
census record, we mean information about each specific person.
For example, a draft card will typically be counted as one
record, as will each line in a census, because each contains
information about a specific individual. When referring to
unstructured data, such as a newspaper, we define each page in
those data sources as a record. When referring to a number of
databases, we mean groups of records we have distinguished as
unique sets based on one or more common characteristics shared
by the records in each set, such as a common time period, place
or subject matter. When referring to a number of titles, we mean
an individual book, directory or newspaper title. For example,
The New York Times counts as a single title, regardless
of the number of editions we have online.
5
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
Common stock offered by Ancestry.com
|
|
4,074,074 shares
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders
|
|
3,333,333 shares
|
Total common stock offered
|
|
7,407,407 shares
|
Total common stock to be outstanding after this offering
|
|
42,402,916 shares
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We expect to use the net proceeds from this offering as follows:
|
|
|
approximately $12.1 million to
repay a portion of our credit facility; and
|
|
|
the remainder for working capital and
other general corporate purposes, which may include the
acquisition of other businesses, products or technologies;
however, we do not have commitments for any acquisitions at this
time.
|
|
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the
selling stockholders. See Use of Proceeds.
|
Risk Factors
|
|
See Risk Factors for a discussion of factors that
you should consider carefully before deciding whether to
purchase shares of our common stock.
|
Nasdaq Global Select Market symbol
|
|
ACOM
|
Except as otherwise indicated, all information in this
prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
assumes a reverse stock split of 1-for-2 of our shares of common
stock effective immediately prior to the consummation of this
offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
assumes that the underwriters will not exercise their option to
purchase 611,112 additional shares from us and 499,999
additional shares from the selling stockholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
excludes 10,326,588 shares issuable upon the exercise of
options outstanding as of September 30, 2009 with a
weighted average exercise price of $5.21 per share; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
excludes an estimated 2,120,146 shares reserved for issuance
pursuant to future grants of awards under our 2009 Stock
Incentive Plan as of the date of this prospectus.
|
6
SUMMARY
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL AND UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL
DATA
The following tables summarize the consolidated historical and
unaudited pro forma financial and operating data for the periods
indicated. The summary consolidated statements of operations
data presented below for the year ended December 31, 2006,
the predecessor period from January 1, 2007 through
December 5, 2007, the successor period from
December 6, 2007 through December 31, 2007 and the
year ended December 31, 2008 have been derived from our
consolidated financial statements which have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm and included elsewhere in this prospectus. The
summary consolidated statements of operations data for the nine
month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 and the
balance sheet data at September 30, 2009 are derived from
our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus and include all adjustments,
consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, that we consider
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and
results of operations as of and for such periods. Operating
results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected
for the full 2009 fiscal year. The unaudited consolidated pro
forma financial data for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007 has been prepared to give effect to the Spectrum investment
in the manner described under Unaudited Consolidated Pro
Forma Financial Data and the notes thereto. The pro forma
adjustments are based upon available information and certain
assumptions that we believe are reasonable. The unaudited
consolidated pro forma financial data are for informational
purposes only and do not purport to represent what our results
of operations actually would have been if the Spectrum
investment had occurred on January 1, 2007, and such data
do not purport to project the results of operations for any
future period. See Risk Factors and the notes to our
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. You should read the summary data presented below in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, the
notes to our consolidated financial statements, Unaudited
Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Data on page 38 of
this prospectus and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Jan. 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 6, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dec. 5, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription revenues
|
|
$
|
137,643
|
|
|
$
|
141,141
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,692
|
|
|
$
|
152,833
|
|
|
$
|
181,391
|
|
|
$
|
133,616
|
|
|
$
|
152,506
|
|
Product and other revenues
|
|
|
12,909
|
|
|
|
12,269
|
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
13,547
|
|
|
|
16,200
|
|
|
|
11,542
|
|
|
|
12,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
150,552
|
|
|
|
153,410
|
|
|
|
|
12,970
|
|
|
|
166,380
|
|
|
|
197,591
|
|
|
|
145,158
|
|
|
|
164,793
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of subscription revenues
|
|
|
27,344
|
|
|
|
33,590
|
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
36,212
|
|
|
|
38,187
|
|
|
|
27,699
|
|
|
|
29,755
|
|
Cost of product and other revenues
|
|
|
3,695
|
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
5,427
|
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
|
|
4,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
31,039
|
|
|
|
36,142
|
|
|
|
|
2,962
|
|
|
|
39,264
|
|
|
|
43,614
|
|
|
|
30,991
|
|
|
|
33,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
119,513
|
|
|
|
117,268
|
|
|
|
|
10,008
|
|
|
|
127,116
|
|
|
|
153,977
|
|
|
|
114,167
|
|
|
|
130,825
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
28,280
|
|
|
|
31,255
|
|
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
|
33,754
|
|
|
|
33,206
|
|
|
|
23,705
|
|
|
|
26,690
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
51,421
|
|
|
|
42,400
|
|
|
|
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
45,607
|
|
|
|
52,341
|
|
|
|
36,634
|
|
|
|
44,226
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
26,978
|
|
|
|
20,723
|
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
22,964
|
|
|
|
28,931
|
|
|
|
21,035
|
|
|
|
24,569
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
24,061
|
|
|
|
23,779
|
|
|
|
17,832
|
|
|
|
12,165
|
|
Transaction related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
108,895
|
|
|
|
106,040
|
|
|
|
|
10,358
|
|
|
|
126,386
|
|
|
|
138,257
|
|
|
|
99,206
|
|
|
|
107,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Jan. 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 6, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dec. 5, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
10,618
|
|
|
|
11,228
|
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
15,720
|
|
|
|
14,961
|
|
|
|
23,175
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(946
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
(12,841
|
)
|
|
|
(12,355
|
)
|
|
|
(9,327
|
)
|
|
|
(4,784
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
12,744
|
|
|
|
12,789
|
|
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
(11,490
|
)
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
|
|
6,248
|
|
|
|
19,151
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(4,595
|
)
|
|
|
(5,018
|
)
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
4,251
|
|
|
|
(1,845
|
)
|
|
|
(2,748
|
)
|
|
|
(6,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
8,149
|
|
|
$
|
7,771
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,239
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
12,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common
share:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In connection with the Spectrum
investment, we were recapitalized. As a result, the capital
structure of our predecessor is not comparable to that of the
successor. Accordingly, net income per common share is not
comparable or meaningful for periods prior to 2008 and has not
been presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Jan. 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 6, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dec. 5, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
30,455
|
|
|
$
|
39,344
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,755
|
|
|
$
|
62,645
|
|
|
$
|
49,062
|
|
|
$
|
52,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash
flow(1)
|
|
|
4,212
|
|
|
|
14,025
|
|
|
|
|
1,774
|
|
|
|
31,712
|
|
|
|
28,018
|
|
|
|
23,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of subscription revenues
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
3,206
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
2,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
3,789
|
|
|
$
|
898
|
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
4,672
|
|
|
$
|
3,509
|
|
|
$
|
4,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Income from operations and net
income, and therefore adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow,
include an expense related to a settlement in the third quarter
of 2009 of a claim regarding the timeliness and accuracy of a
content index we created. The settlement resulted in an expense
of approximately $2.3 million in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Other
Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
subscribers(2)
|
|
|
734,386
|
|
|
|
832,193
|
|
|
|
913,683
|
|
|
|
893,882
|
|
|
|
1,028,180
|
|
Subscriber additions
|
|
|
569,851
|
|
|
|
479,663
|
|
|
|
556,045
|
|
|
|
412,276
|
|
|
|
508,750
|
|
Monthly
churn(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Subscriber acquisition
cost(4)
|
|
$
|
49.29
|
|
|
$
|
70.96
|
|
|
$
|
71.99
|
|
|
$
|
69.46
|
|
|
$
|
68.32
|
|
Average monthly revenue per
subscriber(4)
|
|
$
|
14.52
|
|
|
$
|
14.83
|
|
|
$
|
16.09
|
|
|
$
|
15.95
|
|
|
$
|
16.50
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The terms total subscribers,
monthly churn, subscriber acquisition cost and average monthly
revenue per subscriber are defined in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation Key Business
Metrics section.
|
(2)
|
|
Total subscribers were 600,411 and
681,632 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005,
respectively.
|
(3)
|
|
Monthly churn is the average
monthly churn for the quarters included in the periods shown.
Monthly churn is not comparable for the year ended
December 31, 2006 due to a change in the packaging of our
products and services, and accordingly, has not been presented.
|
(4)
|
|
Based on pro forma expenses and
revenues for 2007. See Unaudited Consolidated Pro Forma
Financial Data on page 38 of this prospectus.
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As adjusted
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
60,593
|
|
|
$
|
96,893
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
476,296
|
|
|
|
512,596
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
69,850
|
|
|
|
69,850
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
|
114,669
|
|
|
|
102,569
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
239,482
|
|
|
|
227,382
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
236,814
|
|
|
|
285,214
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We have presented this summary
balance sheet (i) on an actual basis and (ii) on an as
adjusted basis to reflect our sale of 4,074,074 shares of
our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public
offering price of $13.50 per share, which is the midpoint
of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus,
after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us and the
application of the net proceeds of this offering as set forth
herein. Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial
public price of $13.50 per share, the midpoint of the range set
forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase or
decrease the amount of cash and cash equivalents by
approximately $2.8 million, total stockholders equity
by approximately $3.8 million, and long term debt
(including current portion) by approximately $1.0 million,
assuming the number of shares offered by us as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus remains the same and after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated expenses payable by us. The as adjusted
information presented is illustrative only and will change based
on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of
this offering determined at pricing.
|
Definitions
of Other Financial Data
Adjusted EBITDA. We define adjusted EBITDA as net
income (loss) plus net interest (income) expense; income tax
expense; non-cash charges including depreciation, amortization,
impairment of intangible assets and stock-based compensation
expense; other (income) expense and expenses associated with the
Spectrum investment, such as in-process research and development
and transaction expenses.
Free cash flow. We define free cash flow as net
income (loss) plus net interest (income) expense; income tax
expense; non-cash charges including depreciation, amortization,
impairment of intangible assets and stock-based compensation
expense; other (income) expense and expenses associated with the
Spectrum investment, such as in-process research and development
and transaction expenses, and minus capitalization of content
database costs, capital expenditures and cash paid for income
taxes and interest expense.
Discussion
of other financial data
Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are financial data that are
not calculated in accordance with GAAP. The table below provides
a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to net
income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure
calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted
EBITDA and free cash flow should not be considered as an
alternative to net income, income from operations or any other
measure of financial performance calculated and presented in
accordance with GAAP. Our adjusted EBITDA or free cash flow may
not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other
companies because other companies may not calculate adjusted
EBITDA or free cash flow or similarly titled measures in the
same manner as we do. We prepare adjusted EBITDA and free cash
flow to eliminate the impact of items that we do not consider
indicative of our core operating performance. We encourage you
to evaluate these adjustments and the reasons we consider them
appropriate, as well as the material limitations of non-GAAP
measures and the manner in which we compensate for those
limitations.
Our management uses adjusted EBITDA and is increasingly using
free cash flow:
|
|
|
|
|
as measures of operating performance;
|
|
|
|
as factors when determining managements incentive
compensation;
|
|
|
|
for planning purposes, including the preparation of our annual
operating budget;
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of
our business;
|
|
|
|
to evaluate the effectiveness of our business
strategies; and
|
|
|
|
in communications with our board of directors concerning our
financial performance.
|
Management also uses adjusted EBITDA to evaluate compliance with
the debt covenants in our credit facility, which include an
EBITDA covenant that is substantially similar to adjusted
EBITDA. The definition of EBITDA under our credit facility
differs from our definition of adjusted EBITDA in this
prospectus primarily because the definition in the credit
facility does not exclude interest income (though it does
exclude interest expense) and other income (expense). See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition Liquidity and Capital
Resources for a description of our credit facility.
Management believes that the use of adjusted EBITDA and free
cash flow provides consistency and comparability with our past
financial performance, facilitates period to period comparisons
of operations, and also facilitates comparisons with other peer
companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial measures
to supplement their GAAP results. Management believes that it is
useful to exclude non-cash charges such as depreciation,
amortization, impairment of intangible assets and stock-based
compensation from adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow because (i)
the amount of such non-cash expenses in any specific period may
not directly correlate to the underlying performance of our
business operations and (ii) such expenses can vary
significantly between periods as a result of new acquisitions,
full amortization of previously acquired tangible and intangible
assets or the timing of new stock-based awards, as the case may
be.
More specifically, we believe it is appropriate to exclude
stock-based compensation expense from adjusted EBITDA and free
cash flow because non-cash equity grants made at a certain price
and point in time do not reflect how our business is performing
at any particular time. While we believe that stockholders
should have information about any dilutive effect of outstanding
options and the cost of that compensation, we also believe that
stockholders should have the ability to view the
non-GAAP
financial measures that exclude these costs that management uses
to evaluate our business. The determination of stock-based
compensation expense is based on many subjective inputs at a
point in time and many of these inputs are not necessarily
directly related to the performance of our business. Therefore,
excluding this cost gives us a clearer view of the operating
performance of our business. Because of varying available
valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety
of award types that companies may use under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), which governs
the accounting treatment for
stock-based
compensation, as well as the impact of non-operational factors
such as our share price, on the magnitude of this expense,
management believes that providing
non-GAAP
financial measures that exclude this stock-based compensation
expense allows investors and analysts to make meaningful
comparisons between our operating results with those of other
companies. Stock-based compensation has been a significant
non-cash recurring expense in our business and has been used as
a key incentive offered to our employees. We believe such
compensation contributed to the revenues earned during the
periods presented and also believe it will contribute to the
generation of future period revenues. Stock-based compensation
expense will recur in future periods for GAAP purposes. There
are material limitations to our exclusion of stock-based
compensation from adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow, primarily
that these expenses reduce our GAAP net income. See below for a
further discussion of these limitations on our use of adjusted
EBITDA and free cash flow as an analytical tool, as well as the
manner in which management compensates for these limitations.
We believe it is appropriate to exclude depreciation and
amortization from adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow because
depreciation is a function of our capital expenditures which are
included in our cash flow measure, while amortization reflects
other asset acquisitions made at a point in time and their
associated costs. In analyzing the performance of our business
currently, management believes it is helpful also to consider
the business without taking into account costs or benefits
accruing from historical decisions on infrastructure and
capacity. While these matters do affect the overall financial
health of our company, they are separately evaluated and relate
to historic decisions that do not affect current operations of
our business on a cash flow basis. Further, depreciation and
amortization do not result in ongoing cash expenditures.
Investors should note that the use of assets being depreciated
or amortized contributed to revenues earned during the periods
presented and will continue to contribute to future period
revenues. This depreciation and amortization expense will recur
in future periods for GAAP purposes. There are material
limitations to our exclusion of depreciation and amortization
from adjusted
10
EBITDA and free cash flow, primarily that these expenses reduce
our GAAP net income and the assets being depreciated or
amortized will often have to be replaced in the future,
resulting in future cash requirements. See below for a further
discussion of these limitations on our use of adjusted EBITDA
and free cash flow as an analytical tool, as well as the manner
in which management compensates for these limitations.
We believe it is appropriate to exclude impairment of intangible
assets and acquired in-process research and development from
adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow because these charges relate
to specific past events. In analyzing the performance of our
business currently, management believes it is helpful also to
consider the business without taking into account costs or
benefits accruing from historical decisions or acquisitions.
Further, these charges do not result in ongoing cash
expenditures. There are material limitations to our exclusion of
impairment of intangible assets and in-process research and
design from adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow, primarily that
these expenses reduce our GAAP net income. See below for a
further discussion of these limitations on our use of adjusted
EBITDA and free cash flow as an analytical tool, as well as the
manner in which management compensates for these limitations.
Management believes that it is useful to exclude other income
(expense) from adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow because that
line item consists of items that do not correlate to the
underlying performance of our business, such as retirement and
disposal of non-operating assets and gain or loss on
non-operating investments. Management also believes that it is
useful to exclude transaction expenses and in-process research
and development expense associated with the Spectrum investment
because these expenses were incurred in connection with the
investment and therefore do not occur regularly. There are
material limitations to our exclusion of other income (expense)
from adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow, primarily that these
may include cash income or expense that increase or reduce our
GAAP net income. See below for a further discussion of these
limitations on our use of adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow as
an analytical tool, as well as the manner in which management
compensates for these limitations.
We believe adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are useful to
investors in evaluating our operating performance because
securities analysts use adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow as
supplemental measures to evaluate the overall operating
performance of companies and we anticipate that our investor and
analyst presentations after we are public will include adjusted
EBITDA and free cash flow.
Material
limitations of non-GAAP measures
Although adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are frequently used
by investors and securities analysts in their evaluations of
companies, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow each have
limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider
them in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results
of operations as reported under GAAP.
Some of these limitations are:
|
|
|
|
|
adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow do not reflect our future
requirements for contractual commitments and adjusted EBITDA
does not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements
for capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow do not reflect changes in, or
cash requirements for, our working capital;
|
|
|
|
adjusted EBITDA does not reflect interest income or interest
expense;
|
|
|
|
adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash requirements for income
taxes;
|
|
|
|
adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow do not reflect the non-cash
component of employee compensation;
|
|
|
|
although depreciation, amortization and impairment of intangible
assets are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated or
amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and
adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow do not reflect any cash
requirements for these replacements;
|
|
|
|
adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow do not reflect acquired
in-process research and development charges; and
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
other companies in our industry may calculate adjusted EBITDA or
free cash flow or similarly titled measures differently than we
do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures.
|
Management compensates for the inherent limitations associated
with using the adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow measures
through disclosure of such limitations, presentation of our
financial statements in accordance with GAAP and reconciliation
of adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow to the most directly
comparable GAAP measure, net income (loss). Further, management
also reviews GAAP measures, and evaluates individual measures
that are not included in adjusted EBITDA such as our level of
capital expenditures, equity issuance and interest expense,
among other measures.
The following table presents a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA
and free cash flow to net income, the most comparable GAAP
measure, for each of the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Jan. 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 6, 2007
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dec. 5, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow to net
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
8,149
|
|
|
$
|
7,771
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
12,224
|
|
Interest (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(1,292
|
)
|
|
|
(1,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
11,483
|
|
|
|
8,695
|
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4,595
|
|
|
|
5,018
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
2,748
|
|
|
|
6,927
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
9,559
|
|
|
|
10,594
|
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
10,732
|
|
|
|
8,153
|
|
|
|
8,092
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
6,489
|
|
|
|
7,094
|
|
|
|
|
1,974
|
|
|
|
30,046
|
|
|
|
22,439
|
|
|
|
17,346
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,789
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
4,672
|
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
4,265
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(834
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Impairment of intangible assets and acquired in-process research
and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
30,455
|
|
|
$
|
39,344
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,755
|
|
|
$
|
62,645
|
|
|
$
|
49,062
|
|
|
$
|
52,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization of content database costs
|
|
$
|
(11,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,591
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(1,129
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,965
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,383
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,855
|
)
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(10,127
|
)
|
|
|
(10,572
|
)
|
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
(11,621
|
)
|
|
|
(7,358
|
)
|
|
|
(7,566
|
)
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
|
(1,031
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,068
|
)
|
|
|
(7,206
|
)
|
|
|
(6,624
|
)
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
(3,800
|
)
|
|
|
(3,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(8,985
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
4,212
|
|
|
$
|
14,025
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,774
|
|
|
$
|
31,712
|
|
|
$
|
28,018
|
|
|
$
|
23,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below
and all of the other information contained in this prospectus
before deciding whether to purchase our stock. Our business,
prospects, financial condition or operating results could be
materially adversely affected by any of these risks, as well as
other risks not currently known to us or that we currently
consider immaterial. The trading price of our common stock could
decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part
of your investment. In assessing the risks described below, you
should also refer to the other information contained in the
prospectus, including our consolidated financial statements and
the related notes, before deciding to purchase any shares of our
common stock.
Risks
Related to Our Business
If our efforts to retain and attract subscribers are not
successful, our revenues will be adversely affected.
We generate substantially all of our revenue from subscriptions
to our products and services. We must continue to retain
existing and attract new subscribers. If our efforts to satisfy
our existing subscribers are not successful, we may not be able
to retain them, and as a result, our revenues would be adversely
affected. For example, if consumers do not perceive our products
and services to be reliable, valuable and of high quality, if we
fail to regularly introduce new and improved products and
services, or if we introduce new products or services that are
not favorably received by the market, we may not be able to
retain existing or attract new subscribers. We rely on our
marketing and advertising efforts, including online and offline
performance-based and fixed-cost programs, to retain existing
subscribers and attract new subscribers. If we are unable to
effectively retain existing subscribers and attract new
subscribers, our business, financial condition and results of
operations would be adversely affected.
The relative service levels, pricing and related features of
competitors to our products and services are some of the factors
that may adversely impact our ability to retain existing
subscribers and attract new subscribers. Some of our current
competitors provide genealogical records free of charge. Some
governments or private organizations may make historical records
available online at no cost to consumers and some commercial
entities could choose to make such records available on an
advertising-supported basis rather than a subscription basis. If
consumers are able to satisfy their family history research
needs at no or lower cost, they may not perceive value in our
products and services. If our efforts to satisfy and retain our
existing subscribers are not successful, we may not be able to
continue to attract new subscribers through
word-of-mouth
referrals. Further, subscriber growth may decrease as a result
of a decline in interest in family history research. Any of
these factors could cause our subscriber growth rate to fall,
which would adversely impact our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Our
recent revenue growth rate may not be sustainable, which could
negatively affect our stock price or financial condition and
results of operations.
Our revenues have grown rapidly, increasing from
$122.6 million in 2004 to $197.6 million in 2008,
representing a compound annual growth rate of 12.7%. We may not
be able to sustain our recent growth rate in future periods and
you should not rely on the revenue growth of any prior quarterly
or annual periods as an indication of our future performance. If
our future growth fails to meet investor or analyst
expectations, it could have a negative effect on our stock
price. If our growth rate were to decline significantly or
become negative, it could adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
If we
experience excessive rates of subscriber churn, our revenues and
business will be harmed.
We must continually add new subscribers both to replace
subscribers who choose not to renew their subscriptions and to
grow our business beyond our current subscriber base. We
describe the percentage of subscribers who elect not to renew
their subscriptions as subscriber churn. Subscribers
choose not to renew their subscriptions for many reasons,
including a desire to reduce discretionary spending or a
perception that they do not use the service sufficiently, the
service is a poor value, competitive services provide a better
value or experience, or subscriber service issues are not
satisfactorily resolved. Subscribers may choose not to renew
their subscription at any time prior to the renewal date. If we
are unable to attract new subscribers in numbers greater than
our subscriber
13
churn, our subscriber base will decrease and our business,
financial condition and results of operations will be adversely
affected.
If public interest in family history generally or in our
websites specifically were to increase as a result of a
successful marketing and advertising promotion, media focus (for
example, as a result of the potential introduction of the
television show Who Do You Think You Are? in the
United States in early 2010) or other reasons, we could
experience a spike in new subscriptions. We anticipate that this
in turn would result in an increase in our subscriber churn as
our subscriber base would begin to include people who have
varying degrees of interest in family history or limited
experience using online subscription services. For example, in
2006 we experienced an increase in new subscriptions in the
United Kingdom after the airing of Who Do You Think You
Are? on the BBC. If our subscriber churn increases, we may
be required to increase the rate at which we add new subscribers
in order to maintain and grow our revenues. If excessive numbers
of subscribers cancel our service, we may be required to incur
significantly higher marketing and advertising expenses than we
currently anticipate to replace these subscribers with new
subscribers. A significant increase in our subscriber churn
would have an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Because we recognize revenues from subscriptions to our
service over the term of the subscription, downturns or upturns
in subscription sales may not be immediately reflected in our
operating results and therefore could affect our operating
results in later periods.
We recognize revenues from subscribers ratably over the term of
their subscriptions. Given the mix of annual subscriptions, a
large portion of our revenues for each quarter reflects deferred
revenue from subscription agreements entered into during
previous quarters. Consequently, a decline in new or renewed
subscriptions in any one quarter will not necessarily be fully
reflected in the revenues in that quarter but will negatively
affect our revenues in future quarters. Accordingly, the effect
of significant downturns or upturns in subscription sales or
market acceptance of our service, or changes in subscriber
churn, may not fully impact our results of operations until
future periods.
Because we generate substantially all of our revenue from
online family history resources, particularly in the United
States and United Kingdom, a decline in demand for our products
or services or for online family history resources in general,
and particularly of the United States and United Kingdom, could
cause our revenue to decline.
We generate substantially all of our revenue from our online
family history products and services, and we expect that we will
continue to depend upon our online family history products and
services for substantially all of our revenue in the foreseeable
future. Because we are dependent on our online family history
products and services, factors such as changes in consumer
preferences for these products may have a disproportionately
greater impact on us than if we offered multiple products and
services. The market for online family history resources, and
for consumer products and services in general, is subject to
rapidly changing consumer demand and trends in preferences. If
consumer interest in our online family history products and
services declines, or if consumer interest in family history in
general declines, we would likely experience a significant loss
of revenue. Some of the potential factors that could affect
interest in and demand for online family history products and
services include:
|
|
|
|
|
individuals interest in, and their willingness to spend
time and money, conducting family history research;
|
|
|
|
availability of discretionary funds;
|
|
|
|
awareness of our brand and the family history category;
|
|
|
|
the appeal and reliability of our products and services;
|
|
|
|
the price, performance and availability of competing family
history products and services;
|
|
|
|
public concern regarding privacy and data security;
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain high levels of customer
satisfaction; and
|
|
|
|
the rate of growth in online commerce generally.
|
14
In addition, we recognize substantially all of our revenues from
subscribers in the United States, the United Kingdom, and
to a lesser extent, Australia and Canada. Consequently, a
decrease of interest in and demand for online family history
products and services in these countries could have a
disproportionately greater impact on us than if our geographic
mix of revenue was less concentrated.
A change in our mix of subscription durations could have a
significant impact on our revenue and churn.
A majority of our subscribers have annual subscriptions. At any
point in time, however, the majority of new subscribers
generally sign up for monthly subscriptions, and may or may not
choose to renew or convert to an annual subscription. We
generally experience higher rates of churn for monthly
subscribers than for annual subscribers. If the percentage of
overall subscribers that are monthly subscribers increases, an
increasing part of our revenue would become dependent on monthly
renewals, and we would likely have greater churn. A shift in mix
between annual and monthly subscriptions to more monthly
subscriptions as our subscriber base broadened has resulted in
higher revenue per subscriber over the last several periods.
This trend may not continue and may result in increased churn.
We continually evaluate the types of subscriptions that are most
appropriate for us and our subscribers. As we make these
evaluations, we may more aggressively market subscriptions that
are shorter than our annual subscriptions. Any material change
in our mix of subscription duration could have a significant
impact on our revenue and churn.
Challenges in acquiring historical content and making it
available online could adversely affect our ability to retain
and expand our subscriber base, and therefore adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In order to retain and expand our subscriber base, both
domestically and internationally, we must continue to expend
significant resources to acquire significant amounts of
additional historical content, digitize it and make it available
to our subscribers online. We face legal, logistical and
cultural challenges in acquiring new historical content.
Relevant governmental records may be widely dispersed and held
at a national, state or local level. Religious and private
records are even more widely dispersed. These problems often
pose particular challenges in acquiring content internationally.
For example, content in Germany is highly dispersed, and
legislation in France is particularly stringent. Desirable
content may not be available to us on favorable terms, or at
all, due to competition for a particular collection, privacy
concerns relative to information contained in a given collection
or our lack of negotiating leverage with a certain content
provider. For example, some of our most popular databases
include so-called vital records content
namely, birth, marriage and death records made available by
certain governmental agencies. To help prevent identity theft,
or even terrorist activities, governments may attempt to
restrict the release of all or substantial portions of their
vital records content, and particularly birth records, to third
parties. If these efforts are successful, it may limit or
altogether prevent us from acquiring these types of vital record
content or continuing to make them available online. In many
cases, we will be the first commercial entity that may have
approached the keeper of the records, often a governmental body.
In some cases, we have to lobby for legislation to be changed to
enable government or other bodies to grant us access to records.
While we own most of the images in our database, we generally do
not own the underlying historical documents. If owners of
content have sold or licensed it for digitization purposes on an
exclusive basis to a third party, we would not be able to
acquire this content. The owners of such historical records
generally can allow one or more parties to digitize those
records. If owners of content have sold or licensed the rights
to digitize that content, even on a non-exclusive basis, they
often elect not to sell or license it for digitization purposes
to any other person. Therefore, if one of our competitors
acquires rights to digitize a set of content, even on a
non-exclusive basis, we may be unable to acquire rights to
digitize that content collection. In some cases, acquisition of
content involves competitive bidding, and we have in the past
and may in the future choose not to bid or not successfully bid
to acquire content rights. In addition, a number of governmental
bodies and other organizations are interested in making
historical content available for free and owners of historical
records may license or sell their records to such governmental
bodies and organizations in addition to or instead of licensing
or selling their content to us. Our inability to offer vital
records or other valuable content as part of our family history
research databases or the widespread availability of such
content elsewhere at lower cost or for free could result in our
subscription products and services becoming less valuable to
consumers, which could have an adverse impact on our number of
subscribers or subscriber churn, and therefore on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
15
We depend in part upon third party licenses for some of
our historical content, and a loss of those licenses, or
disputes regarding royalties under these licenses, could
adversely affect our ability to retain and expand our subscriber
base, and therefore adversely affect our revenues, financial
condition and results of operations.
Though we own most of the images in our databases, in some cases
on a non-exclusive basis, we acquire a portion of our content
pursuant to ongoing license agreements. Some of these agreements
have finite terms and we may not be able to renew the agreements
on terms that are advantageous to us or at all. For example, we
license a significant amount of our United Kingdom content from
the United Kingdom National Archives under several license
agreements that generally have ten year terms, with varying
automatic extension periods. These agreements with the United
Kingdom National Archive expire from 2012 to 2019. The
agreements are generally terminable by either party for breach
by the other party and by the United Kingdom National Archives
upon our insolvency or bankruptcy. Some of these agreements
permit the United Kingdom National Archives to terminate
these licenses if we undergo a change of control.
If a current or future license for a significant content
collection were to be terminated, we may not be able to obtain a
new license on terms advantageous to us or at all and we could
be required to remove the relevant content from our websites,
either immediately or after some period of time. If a content
provider were to license or sell us content in violation of that
content providers agreements with other parties, we could
be required to remove that content from our websites. If we were
required to remove a material amount of content from our
websites, as a result of the termination of one or more licenses
or otherwise, it could adversely affect our business and results
of operations. Some of these license agreements restrict the
manner in which we use the applicable content, which could limit
our ability to leverage that content for new uses as we expand
our business. We pay royalties under some of these license
agreements, and the other party to those royalty-bearing
agreements may have a right to audit the calculation of our
royalty payments. If there were to be a disagreement regarding
the calculation of royalty payments, we could be required to
make additional payments under those agreements. We also have
indemnification obligations under many of these agreements.
While we have not experienced any claims to date, we could
experience claims in the future which, if material, could have a
negative impact on our results of operations and financial
condition.
Digitizing and indexing new content can take a significant
amount of time and expense, and can expose us to risks
associated with the loss or damage of historical documents. Our
inability to maintain or acquire content or make new content
available online in a timely and cost-effective manner, or
liability for loss of historical documents, could have an
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Digitizing and indexing new historical content can take a
significant amount of time and expense and we generally incur
the expenses related to such content significantly in advance of
the time we can make it available to our subscribers. We have
invested approximately $80 million in content to date and
expect to continue to spend significant resources on content.
Increases in the cost or time required to digitize and index new
content could harm our financial results. In 2008, one of our
transcription vendors, Beijing Formax, performed a majority of
our data transcription as measured by cost. We do not have
long-term contracts with any of our transcription vendors. If we
were to replace that transcription vendor or any other
transcription vendor for any reason, we would be required to
provide extensive training to the new vendor, which could delay
our ability to make our new content available to our
subscribers, and our relationships with the new transcription
vendors may be on financial or other terms less favorable to us
than our existing arrangements. Our inability to maintain or
acquire content or to make new content available online in a
timely and cost-effective manner would have an adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, if we acquire content that ultimately generates
only minimal subscriber interest, the cost of acquiring and
processing that content may exceed the incremental revenues
produced by the content, which would adversely affect our
profitability. For example, we took an impairment charge with
respect to content acquired for our China-focused website after
we shifted our strategy for that market.
While we are digitizing borrowed content, we may be in
possession of valuable and irreplaceable original historical
documents. While we maintain insurance with respect to such
documents, any loss or damage to such
16
documents, while in our possession, could cause us significant
expense and could have a material adverse effect on our
reputation and the potential willingness of content owners to
sell, license or lend their content to us.
We face competition from a number of different sources,
and our failure to compete effectively with current and future
competitors could adversely affect our ability to retain and
expand our subscriber base, and therefore adversely impact our
revenues, results of operations and financial condition.
We face competition in our business from a variety of online and
offline organizations, some of which provide genealogical
records free of charge. We expect competition to increase in the
future. We generally compete on the basis of content, price,
technology, ease of use, brand recognition, breadth of products,
service and support, and the number of network members with whom
other members can collaborate.
Ancestry.com and our similar international websites face
competition from:
|
|
|
|
|
FamilySearch, and its website FamilySearch.org, a genealogy
organization that is part of The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day
Saints. The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day
Saints has, for over 100 years, actively gathered,
preserved and shared genealogical records worldwide.
FamilySearch has an extensive collection of paper and microfilm
records (more than 2.3 million rolls of microfilm and
180,000 sets of microfiche), which it maintains in a central
storage facility in Utah. FamilySearch has digitized a large
quantity of these records and has published them online at
FamilySearch.org, where it makes them available to the public
for free and through over 4,500 family history centers located
throughout the world. FamilySearch is a well funded organization
and has stated its intention to undertake a massive digitization
project to bring most of its collection online over the next few
years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial entities, including online genealogical research
services, library content distributors, search engines and
portals, retailers of books and software related to genealogical
research and family tree creation and family history oriented
social networking websites.
|
|
|
|
Other non-profit entities and organizations, genealogical
societies, governments and agencies that may make vital
statistics or other records available to the public for free.
|
As we continue to diversify our breadth of products and services
and expand internationally, we expect our competition to expand
to include other Internet-based and offline businesses,
governments and other entities. Our current and future
competitors may have greater resources, more well-established
brand recognition or more sophisticated technologies, such as
search algorithms, than we do or may more easily obtain relevant
records in international markets. Additionally, our current and
future competitors may offer new categories of content, products
or services before us, or at lower prices, which may give them a
competitive advantage in attracting subscribers. Our current and
future competitors may make historical records available online
at no cost or on an advertising-supported basis rather than a
subscription basis. Our future competitors and their products
and services may be superior to any of our current competition.
There has recently been some consolidation in our industry, and
such consolidation could also increase competition in the
future, including competition with respect to acquisition of
content, exclusivity of content or pricing. To compete
effectively, we may need to expend significant resources on
content acquisition, technology or marketing and advertising. We
currently plan to distinguish ourselves from our competitors on
the basis of access to content, technological leadership and the
depth of our subscriber community. These efforts may be
expensive and could reduce our margins, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Competitive
pricing pressures could cause us to fail to retain existing or
attract new subscribers and harm our revenues and results of
operations.
Demand for our products and services is sensitive to price. Many
external factors, including our marketing, content acquisition
and technology costs and our current and future
competitors pricing and marketing strategies, can
significantly affect our pricing strategies, particularly in
markets outside the United States. Some of our competitors
provide genealogical records free of charge. If we fail to meet
our subscribers pricing expectations, we could fail to
retain existing or attract new subscribers, either of which
would harm our business and results of operations. Changes in
our pricing strategies could have a significant impact on our
revenues and net income.
17
Our growth could strain our personnel, technology and
infrastructure resources, and if we are unable to implement
appropriate controls and procedures to manage our growth, we may
not be able to successfully implement our business plan.
Our growth in operations has placed a significant strain on our
management, administrative, technological, operational and
financial infrastructure. Anticipated future growth, including
growth related to the broadening of our product and service
offerings and our expansion into new geographic areas, will
continue to place similar strains on our personnel, technology
and infrastructure. A sudden increase in our number of
registered users could strain our capacity and result in website
performance issues. Our success will depend in part upon the
management ability of our officers with respect to growth
opportunities. To manage the expected growth of our operations,
we will need to continue to improve our operational, financial,
technological and management controls and our reporting systems
and procedures. Additional capital investments will increase our
cost base, which will make it more difficult for us to offset
any future revenue shortfalls by offsetting expense reductions
in the short term. If we fail to successfully manage our growth,
it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Any significant disruption in service on our websites or
in our computer systems, which are currently hosted primarily by
a single third-party, could damage our reputation and result in
a loss of subscribers, which would harm our business and
operating results.
Registered users access our service through our websites, where
our family history research databases are located, and our
internal billing software and operations are integrated with our
product and service offerings. Our brand, reputation and ability
to attract, retain and serve our subscribers is dependent upon
the reliable performance of our websites, network
infrastructure, content delivery processes and payment systems.
We have experienced interruptions in these systems in the past,
including server failures that temporarily slowed down our
websites performance and access to content, or made our
websites inaccessible, and we may experience interruptions in
the future. Interruptions in these systems, whether due to
system failures, computer viruses or physical or electronic
break-ins, could affect the security or availability of our
websites and prevent our registered users from accessing our
data and using our products and services. Problems with the
reliability or security of our systems may require disclosure to
our lenders and could harm our reputation, and damage to our
reputation and the cost of remedying these problems could
negatively affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Substantially all of our communications, network and computer
hardware used to operate our websites are co-located in a
facility in Utah. We do not own or control the operation of this
facility. We are establishing a redundant system in Denver,
Colorado, and we expect to complete this project within the next
12 months. Our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage
or interruption from fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications
failure, terrorist attacks, acts of war, electronic and physical
break-ins, computer viruses, earthquakes and similar events. The
occurrence of any of the foregoing events could result in damage
to our systems and hardware or could cause them to fail
completely, and our insurance may not cover such events or may
be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur. Our
systems are not yet redundant, so a total failure of our system
could cause our websites to be inaccessible by our registered
users. Problems faced by our third-party web hosting provider,
with the telecommunications network providers with whom it
contracts or with the systems by which it allocates capacity
among its customers, including us, could adversely affect the
experience of our subscribers. Our third-party web hosting
provider could decide to close its facilities without adequate
notice. In addition, any financial difficulties, such as
bankruptcy reorganization, faced by our third-party web hosting
provider or any of the service providers with whom it contracts
may have negative effects on our business, the nature and extent
of which are difficult to predict. Additionally, if our
third-party web hosting provider is unable to keep up with our
growing needs for capacity, this could have an adverse effect on
our business. Any errors, defects, disruptions or other
performance problems with our services could harm our reputation
and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Our
operating results depend on numerous factors and may fluctuate
from quarter to quarter, which could make them difficult to
predict.
Our quarterly operating results are tied to certain financial
and operational metrics that have fluctuated in the past and may
fluctuate significantly in the future. As a result, you should
not rely upon our past quarterly operating
18
results as indicators of future performance. Our operating
results depend on numerous factors, many of which are outside of
our control. In addition to the other risks described in this
Risk Factors section, the following risks could
cause our operating results to fluctuate:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain existing subscribers and attract new
subscribers;
|
|
|
|
the mix of annual and monthly subscribers at any given time;
|
|
|
|
timing and amount of costs of new and existing marketing and
advertising efforts;
|
|
|
|
timing and amount of operating costs and capital expenditures
relating to expansion of our business, operations and
infrastructure, including content acquisition and international
expansion costs;
|
|
|
|
the cost and timing of the development and introduction of new
product and service offerings by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
downward pressure on the pricing of our subscriptions;
|
|
|
|
system failures, security breaches or Internet downtime; and
|
|
|
|
seasonal fluctuations in the usage of our websites.
|
For these or other reasons, the results of any prior quarterly
or annual periods should not be relied upon as indications of
our future performance and our revenue and operating results in
future quarters may differ materially from the expectations of
management or investors.
We require a significant amount of cash to service our
indebtedness, which reduces the cash available to finance our
organic growth and strategic acquisitions, alliances and
collaborations. If we fail to grow as a result of limitations on
available cash, it could harm our financial condition and stock
price.
We have a significant amount of indebtedness, as described in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources. Our indebtedness could:
|
|
|
|
|
make us more vulnerable to unfavorable economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
make it more difficult to obtain additional financing in the
future for working capital, capital expenditures or other
general corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our business and the markets in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate or reserve a large portion of our cash
flow from operations for making payments on our indebtedness,
which would prevent us from using it for other purposes;
|
|
|
|
make us susceptible to fluctuations in market interest rates
that affect the cost of our borrowings to the extent that our
variable rate debt is not covered by interest rate derivative
agreements; and
|
|
|
|
make it more difficult to pursue strategic acquisitions,
alliances and collaborations.
|
Our existing credit facility contains a number of financial and
operating covenants which could limit our flexibility in
operating our business. For example, our credit facility limits
our capital expenditures, which limits the amount we can spend
on content acquisition, and it limits the amount we can pay when
acquiring companies. These restrictions and covenants, among
other things, limit our ability to: incur additional
indebtedness; make investments; pay dividends or make
distributions to our stockholders; grant liens on our assets;
sell assets; enter into a new or different line of business;
enter into transactions with our affiliates; acquire, merge or
consolidate with other entities or transfer all or substantially
all of our assets; and enter into sale and leaseback
transactions. Our failure to comply with any covenant could
result in a default under the credit facility. Our ability to
service our indebtedness and comply with the covenants will
depend on our future performance, which will be affected by
prevailing economic conditions and financial, business,
regulatory and other factors. Some of these factors are beyond
our control. We believe that, based upon current levels of
operations, we will be able to comply with the covenants in our
credit facility and meet our debt service obligations when due.
Significant assumptions underlie this belief
19
including, among other things, that we will continue to be
successful in implementing our business strategy and that there
will be no material adverse developments in our business,
liquidity or capital requirements. If we cannot generate
sufficient cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness
and to meet our other obligations and commitments, we might be
required to refinance our debt or to dispose of assets to obtain
funds for such purpose. We cannot assure you that refinancings
or asset dispositions could be effected on a timely basis or on
satisfactory terms, if at all, or would be permitted by the
terms of our debt instruments.
Our obligations under the existing credit facility are secured
by collateral, which includes substantially all of our assets,
including our intellectual property. If we are not able to
satisfy our obligations under the credit facility, the creditors
could exercise their rights under the credit facility, which
include taking control of the collateral, including our
intellectual property, which would have a material adverse
effect on our business.
Upon consummation of the offering and the application of the net
proceeds as set forth under Use of Proceeds, we
expect our borrowings under our credit facility to be
$102.6 million.
We may need additional capital, and we cannot be certain
that additional financing will be available. If we fail to
obtain additional financing if needed, it could harm our growth
and our ability to respond to business challenges.
We have funded our operations and capital expenditures primarily
from cash flow from operations during the last five years. In
connection with the Spectrum investment, we incurred a
significant amount of indebtedness. Although we currently
anticipate that our available funds and cash flow from
operations will be sufficient to meet our cash needs for at
least the next 12 months, we may require additional
financing in the future. Our ability to obtain financing will
depend, among other things, on our development efforts, business
plans, operating performance and condition of the capital
markets at the time we seek financing. Additional financing may
not be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, when
required. The ongoing financial stress affecting the banking
system and financial markets and the going concern threats to
financial institutions could make it more difficult for us to
obtain additional financing if we should require it. CIT Lending
Services Corporation, one of the lenders in the lending
syndicate for the revolving portion of our credit facility, has
recently suffered financial difficulties, according to media
reports, and its parent company, CIT Group Inc., has recently
launched a restructuring plan, according to public filings. If
it or any other of the financial institutions that are in the
syndicate for the revolving portion of our credit facility were
to suffer financial difficulties or enter bankruptcy, it could
affect our ability to draw down on that facility. If we raise
additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-linked
or debt securities, those securities may have rights,
preferences or privileges senior to the rights of our common
stock, and our stockholders may experience dilution. If we are
unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms
satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to service
our outstanding indebtedness, to continue to support our
business growth and to respond to business challenges could be
significantly limited.
If our marketing and advertising efforts fail to generate
additional revenues on a cost-effective basis, or if we are
unable to manage our marketing and advertising expenses, it
could harm our results of operations and growth.
Our future growth and profitability, as well as the maintenance
and enhancement of our brands, will depend in large part on the
effectiveness and efficiency of our marketing and advertising
expenditures. We use a diverse mix of online and offline
performance-based and fixed-cost marketing and advertising
programs to promote our products and services and we
periodically adjust our mix of marketing and advertising
programs. Significant increases in the pricing of one or more of
our marketing and advertising channels would increase our
marketing and advertising expense or cause us to choose less
expensive but less effective marketing and advertising channels.
As we implement new marketing and advertising strategies and
phase out older strategies, we may need to expand into marketing
and advertising channels with significantly higher costs than
our current channels, which could adversely affect our
profitability. Further, we may over time become
disproportionately reliant on one channel or partner, which
would limit our marketing and advertising flexibility and could
increase our operating expenses. We may incur marketing and
advertising expenses significantly in advance of the time we
anticipate recognizing revenue associated with such expenses,
and our marketing and advertising expenditures may not result in
increased revenue or generate sufficient levels of brand
awareness. For example, we have purchased product integration in
the television show Who Do You Think You Are? in the
United States, but we may only at a later date, or never,
experience an increase in revenue or brand awareness as a result
of such expenditures. If we are unable to maintain
20
our marketing and advertising channels on cost-effective terms
or replace existing marketing and advertising channels with
similarly effective channels, our marketing and advertising
expenses could increase substantially, our subscriber levels
could be affected adversely, and our business, financial
condition and results of operations may suffer.
We anticipate that as we market our products and services to a
broader market, including people who may not be Internet-savvy
or may be new to family history research, we may be required to
develop new, more costly online and offline advertising
channels, such as television advertising. Such expanded efforts
may yield fewer new subscriptions per marketing and other
greater advertising expenditures than our strategies to date. We
may decide to expand our international marketing and advertising
efforts, which will lead to a significant increase in our
marketing and advertising expenses. Any of these additional
expenses may not result in sufficient customer growth to offset
cost, which would have an adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to improve market recognition of and
loyalty to our brands, or if our reputation were to be harmed,
we could lose subscribers or fail to increase the number of
subscribers, which could harm our revenues, results of
operations and financial condition.
We believe that maintaining and enhancing our Ancestry.com and
other brands is critical to our success. We believe that the
importance of brand recognition and loyalty will only increase
in light of increasing competition in our markets. We plan to
continue to promote our brands, both domestically and
internationally, but there is no guarantee that our selected
strategies will increase the favorable recognition of our
brands. Some of our existing and potential competitors,
including search engines, media companies and government and
religious institutions have well-established brands with greater
brand recognition than we have. Additionally, from time to time,
our subscribers express dissatisfaction with our service,
including, among other things, dissatisfaction with our
auto-renewal and other billing policies, our handling of
personal data and the way our services operate. To the extent
that dissatisfaction with our service is widespread or not
adequately addressed, our brand may be adversely impacted. If
our efforts to promote and maintain our brand are not
successful, our operating results and our ability to attract and
retain subscribers may be adversely affected. In addition, even
if our brand recognition and loyalty increases, this may not
result in increased use of our products and services or higher
revenues. Many of our subscribers are passionate about family
history research, and many of these subscribers participate in
blogs on this topic both on our websites and elsewhere. If
actions we take or changes we make to our products upset these
subscribers, their blogging could negatively affect our brand
and reputation. We have a limited operating history, and you
should not rely upon our historic growth rates as an indicator
of future growth.
Online family history research is a relatively new industry and
our operational history in the online family history research
industry is also relatively limited. Consequently, it is
difficult to predict the ultimate size of the industry and the
acceptance by the market of our products and services. Our
business strategy and projections rely on a number of
assumptions, some or all of which may be incorrect. For example,
we believe that consumers will be willing to pay for
subscriptions to our online family history resources,
notwithstanding the fact that some of our current and future
competitors provide such resources free of charge. We cannot
accurately predict whether our products and services will
achieve significant acceptance by potential users in
significantly larger numbers than at present. You should
therefore not rely on our historic growth rates as an indication
of future growth.
Our business could be adversely affected if our
subscribers are not satisfied with our products and services. If
we lose subscribers or fail to increase the number of
subscribers due to dissatisfaction with our products and
services, it could harm our revenues, results of operations and
financial condition.
Our business depends on our ability to satisfy our subscribers.
Our subscribers satisfaction may be negatively impacted by
factors that are actual or perceived by them, such as
limitations in our technologies, changes in our products and
services, interruptions or slowness in online capacity of our
websites, privacy and data security concerns, speed of search of
our online content and relevance of search results, as well as
perceived ease of search, and our automatic subscription renewal
by credit card policy, including any perceptions of credit card
fraud. If we do not handle subscriber complaints effectively,
our brand and reputation may suffer, we may lose our
subscribers confidence, and they may choose not to renew
their subscriptions. Complaints or negative publicity about our
21
products, services or billing practices could adversely impact
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our promotional offerings and our introduction of new
products may have unintended effects on the demand for our
products and services, which could negatively affect our total
number of subscribers and adversely affect our revenues over
time.
Many of our promotional offerings involve temporary free access
to our data. By granting temporary free access to many of our
records, and permanent free access to a smaller set of our
records, we may provide sufficient access to some registered
users who are not subscribers to satisfy their family history
needs, and may therefore fail to generate additional revenues as
intended. Additionally, alternative subscriptions with terms of
less than one year, such as monthly subscriptions and
pay-per-view
offerings, may result in fewer annual subscriptions from both
new and existing subscribers and lower revenues per subscriber
over time. If any of these products or offerings has the effect
of reducing our long-term subscriber base or total number of
subscriptions, our revenues may decrease over time and our
business may suffer.
We face many risks associated with our plans to continue
to expand our international offerings and marketing and
advertising efforts, which could harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
In addition to our United States and United Kingdom websites,
since 2006, we have launched websites directed at Australia,
Canada, Germany, France, Italy, Sweden and China and launched an
initial version of our global Mundia.com website in the third
quarter of 2009. For the nine months ended September 30,
2009, approximately 34% of subscribers to our Ancestry.com
websites, and approximately 25% of our revenues from
subscribers, were from locations outside the United States. We
anticipate that our continuing international expansion will
entail the marketing and advertising of our products, services
and brands, and the development of localized websites. We may
not succeed in these efforts and achieve our subscriber
acquisition or other goals. For some international markets,
customer preferences and buying behaviors may be different, and
we may use business models that are different from our
traditional subscription model that provides company-acquired
content to subscribers. Our revenues from new foreign markets
may not exceed the costs of establishing, marketing and
maintaining our international offerings, and therefore may not
be profitable on a sustained basis. We will be subject to risks
of doing business internationally, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in developing and marketing our offerings and
brands as a result of distance, language and cultural
differences;
|
|
|
|
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
more stringent consumer and data protection laws;
|
|
|
|
local socio-economic and political conditions;
|
|
|
|
technical difficulties and costs associated with the
localization of our service offerings;
|
|
|
|
strong local competitors;
|
|
|
|
lack of experience in certain geographical markets;
|
|
|
|
different and conflicting legal and regulatory regimes;
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations;
|
|
|
|
different and conflicting intellectual property laws;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing international
operations; and
|
|
|
|
risk of business or user fraud.
|
One or more of these factors could harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
22
If we are unable to continually enhance our products and
services and adapt them to technological changes and subscriber
needs, we may not remain competitive and our business may fail
to grow or decline.
Our business is rapidly changing. To remain competitive, we must
continue to provide relevant content and enhance and improve the
functionality and features of our products and services. If
competitors introduce new solutions embodying new technologies,
our existing products and services may become obsolete. Our
future success will depend, among other things, on our ability
to:
|
|
|
|
|
anticipate demand for new products and services;
|
|
|
|
enhance our existing solutions; and
|
|
|
|
respond to technological advances on a cost-effective and timely
basis.
|
Developing the technologies in our products entails significant
technical and business risks. We may use new technologies
ineffectively, or we may fail to adapt our products and services
to the demands of our subscribers. If we face material delays in
introducing new or enhanced solutions, our subscribers may
forego the use of our solutions in favor of those of our
competitors.
Undetected product or service errors or defects could
result in the loss of revenues, delayed market acceptance of our
products or services or claims against us.
We offer a variety of Internet-based products and a software
product, Family Tree Maker, all of which are complex and
frequently upgraded. Our Internet-based products and software
product may contain undetected errors, defects, failures or
viruses, especially when first introduced or when new versions
or enhancements are released. Despite product testing, our
products, or third party products that we incorporate into ours,
may contain undetected errors, defects or viruses that could,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
require us to make extensive changes to our subscription
products and services or software product, which would increase
our expenses;
|
|
|
|
expose us to claims for damages;
|
|
|
|
require us to incur additional technical support costs;
|
|
|
|
cause a negative registered user reaction that could reduce
future sales;
|
|
|
|
generate negative publicity regarding us and our subscription
products and software product; or
|
|
|
|
result in subscribers delaying their subscription or software
purchase or electing not to renew their subscriptions.
|
Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect
upon our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Privacy
concerns could require us to incur significant expense and
modify our operations in a manner that could result in
restrictions and prohibitions on our use of certain information,
and therefore harm our business.
As part of our business, we make biographical and historical
data available through our websites, we use registered
users personal data for internal purposes and we host
websites and message boards, among other things, that contain
content supplied by third parties. In addition, in connection
with our Ancestry.com | DNA product, we obtain biological
DNA samples used for genetic testing. For privacy or security
reasons, privacy groups, governmental agencies and individuals
may seek to restrict or prevent our use or publication of
certain biological or historical information pertaining to
individuals, particularly living persons. We will also face
additional privacy issues as we expand into other international
markets, as many nations have privacy protections more stringent
than those in the United States. We have incurred, and will
continue to incur, expenses to comply with privacy and security
standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry
standards or contractual obligations. Increased domestic or
international regulation of data utilization and distribution
practices, including self-
23
regulation, could require us to modify our operations and incur
significant expense, which could have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our possession and use of personal information presents
risks and expenses that could harm our business. Unauthorized
disclosure or manipulation of such data, whether through breach
of our network security or otherwise, could expose us to costly
litigation and damage our reputation.
Maintaining our network security is of critical importance
because our online systems store confidential registered user,
employee and other sensitive data, such as names, addresses,
credit card numbers and other personal information. In
particular, a substantial majority of our subscribers use credit
and debit cards to purchase our products and services. If we or
our processing vendors were to have problems with our billing
software, it could have an adverse effect on our subscriber
satisfaction and could cause one or more of the major credit
companies to disallow our continued use of their payment
products. In addition, if our billing software fails to work
properly and, as a result, we do not automatically charge our
subscribers credit cards on a timely basis or at all, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
adversely affected.
In addition, our online systems store the content that our
registered users upload onto our websites, such as family
records and photos. This content is often personally meaningful,
and our registered users may rely on our online system to store
digital copies of such content. If we were to lose such content,
if our users private content were to be publicly available
or if third parties were able to access and manipulate such
content, we may face liability and harm to our brand and
reputation.
We and our vendors use commercially available encryption
technology to transmit personal information when taking orders.
We use security and business controls to limit access and use of
personal information, including registered users uploaded
content. However, third parties may be able to circumvent these
security and business measures by developing and deploying
viruses, worms and other malicious software programs that are
designed to attack or attempt to infiltrate our systems and
networks. In addition, employee error, malfeasance or other
errors in the storage, use or transmission of personal
information could result in a breach of registered user or
employee privacy.
If third parties improperly obtain and use the personal
information of our registered users or employees, we may be
required to expend significant resources to resolve these
problems. A major breach of our network security and systems
could have serious negative consequences for our businesses,
including possible fines, penalties and damages, reduced demand
for our products and services, an unwillingness of subscribers
to provide us with their credit card or payment information, an
unwillingness of registered users to upload family records or
photos onto our websites, harm to our reputation and brand and
loss of our ability to accept and process subscriber credit card
orders. Similarly, if a well-publicized breach of data security
at any other major consumer website were to occur, there could
be a general public loss of confidence in the use of the
Internet for commercial transactions. Any of these events could
have material adverse effects on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Any
claims related to activities of registered users and the content
they upload could result in expenses that could harm our results
of operations and financial condition.
Our registered users often upload their own content onto our
websites. The terms of use of such content are set forth in the
terms and conditions of our websites and a submission agreement
that registered users agree to when they upload their content.
Disputes or negative publicity about the use of such content
could make members more reluctant to upload personal content or
harm our reputation. We do not review or monitor content
uploaded by our registered users, and could face claims arising
from or liability for making any such content available on our
websites. In addition, our collaboration tools and other
features of our site allow registered users to contact each
other. While registered users can choose to remain anonymous in
such communications, registered users may choose to engage with
one another without anonymity. If any such contact were to lead
to fraud or other harm, we may face claims against us and
negative publicity. Litigation to defend these claims or efforts
to counter any negative publicity could be costly and any other
liabilities we incur in connection with any such claims may harm
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
24
Increases in credit card processing fees would increase
our operating expenses and adversely affect our results of
operations, and the termination of our relationship with any
major credit card company would have a severe, negative impact
on our ability to collect revenues from subscribers.
The substantial majority of our subscribers pay for our products
and services using credit cards. From time to time, the major
credit card companies or the issuing banks may increase the fees
that they charge for each transaction using their cards. An
increase in those fees would require us to either increase the
prices we charge for our products, or suffer a negative impact
on our profitability, either of which could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, our credit card fees may be increased by credit
card companies if our chargeback rate, or the rate of payment
refunds, exceeds certain minimum thresholds. If we are unable to
maintain our chargeback rate at acceptable levels, our credit
card fees for chargeback transactions, or for all credit card
transactions, may be further increased, and, if the problem
significantly worsens, credit card companies may increase our
fees or terminate their relationship with us. Any increases in
our credit card fees could adversely affect our results of
operations, particularly if we elect not to raise our
subscription rates to offset the increase. The termination of
our ability to process payments on any major credit or debit
card would significantly impair our ability to operate our
business.
If government regulation of the Internet or other areas of
our business changes or if consumer attitudes toward use of the
Internet change, we may need to change the manner in which we
conduct our business in a manner that is less profitable or
incur greater operating expenses, which could harm our results
of operations.
The adoption, modification or interpretation of laws or
regulations relating to the Internet or other areas of our
business could adversely affect the manner in which we conduct
our business or the overall popularity or growth in use of the
Internet. Such laws and regulations may cover automatic
subscription renewal, credit card processing procedures, sales
and other procedures, tariffs, user privacy, data protection,
pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, electronic
contracts, consumer protection, broadband residential Internet
access and the characteristics and quality of services. In
foreign countries, such as countries in Europe, such laws may be
more restrictive than in the United States. It is not clear how
existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, sales
and other taxes, libel and personal privacy apply to the
Internet. If we are required to comply with new regulations or
legislation or new interpretations of existing regulations or
legislation, this compliance could cause us to incur additional
expenses, make it more difficult to renew subscriptions
automatically, make it more difficult to attract new subscribers
or otherwise alter our business model. Any of these outcomes
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
Our revenues may be adversely affected if we are required
to charge sales taxes in additional jurisdictions and/or other
taxes for our products and services.
We collect or have imposed upon us sales or other taxes related
to the products and services we sell in certain states and other
jurisdictions. Additional states or one or more countries or
other jurisdictions may seek to impose sales or other tax
collection obligations on us in the future. A successful
assertion by any country, state or other jurisdiction in which
we do business that we should be collecting sales or other taxes
on the sale of our products and services could, among other
things, create significant administrative burdens for us, result
in substantial tax liabilities for past sales, discourage
registered users from purchasing from us or otherwise
substantially harm our business and results of operations.
We
face risk associated with currency exchange rate fluctuations,
which could adversely affect our operating
results.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, approximately
20% of our total revenues were received, and approximately 10%
of our total expenses were paid, in currencies other than the
United States dollar, such as the British pound sterling, the
Canadian dollar and the Australian dollar. As a result, we are
at risk for exchange rate fluctuations between such foreign
currencies and the United States dollar, which could affect our
results of operations. We attempt to limit our exposure by
paying our operating expenses incurred in foreign jurisdictions
with revenues received in the applicable currency, but if we do
not have enough local currency to pay all our expenses in
25
that currency, we are exposed to currency exchange rate risk
with respect to those expenses. We are also exposed to exchange
rate risk with respect to our profits earned in foreign
currency. Even if we were to implement hedging strategies to
mitigate foreign currency risk, these strategies might not
eliminate our exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations and
would involve costs and risks of their own, such as ongoing
management time and expertise, external costs to implement the
strategies and potential accounting implications.
If we acquire any businesses or technologies in the
future, they could prove difficult to integrate, disrupt our
ongoing business, dilute stockholder value or have an adverse
effect on our results of operations.
As part of our business strategy, we may engage in acquisitions
of businesses or technologies to augment our organic or internal
growth. While we have engaged in some acquisitions in the past,
we do not have extensive experience with integrating and
managing acquired businesses or assets. Acquisitions involve
challenges and risks in negotiation, execution, valuation and
integration. Moreover, we may not be able to find suitable
acquisition opportunities on terms that are acceptable to us.
Even if successfully negotiated, closed and integrated, certain
acquisitions may not advance our business strategy, may fall
short of expected
return-on-investment
targets or may fail. Any future acquisition could involve
numerous risks including:
|
|
|
|
|
potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of
management;
|
|
|
|
difficulty integrating the operations and products of the
acquired business;
|
|
|
|
use of cash to fund the acquisition or for unanticipated
expenses;
|
|
|
|
limited market experience in new businesses;
|
|
|
|
exposure to unknown liabilities, including litigation against
the companies we may acquire;
|
|
|
|
additional costs due to differences in culture, geographic
locations and duplication of key talent;
|
|
|
|
acquisition-related accounting charges affecting our balance
sheet and operations;
|
|
|
|
dilution to our current stockholders from the issuance of equity
securities; and
|
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees or customers of the acquired
company.
|
In the event we enter into any acquisition agreements, closing
of the transactions could be delayed or prevented by regulatory
approval requirements, including antitrust review, or other
conditions. We may not be successful in addressing these risks
or any other problems encountered in connection with any
attempted acquisitions, and we could assume the economic risks
of such failed or unsuccessful acquisitions.
Our
business may be significantly impacted by a change in the
economy, including any resulting effect on consumer
spending.
Our business may be affected by changes in the economy
generally, including any resulting effect on consumer spending
specifically. Our products and services are discretionary
purchases, and consumers may reduce their discretionary spending
on our products and services during an economic downturn such as
the present economic downturn. Although we have not yet
experienced a material increase in subscription cancellations or
a material reduction in subscription renewals, we may yet
experience such an increase or reduction in the future,
especially in the event of a prolonged recessionary period.
Conversely, consumers may spend more time using the Internet
during an economic downturn and may have less time for our
products and services in a period of economic growth. In
addition, media prices may increase in a period of economic
growth, which could significantly increase our marketing and
advertising expenses. As a result, our business, financial
condition and results operations may be significantly affected
by changes in the economy generally.
The loss of one or more of our key personnel, or our
failure to attract, assimilate and retain other highly qualified
personnel in the future, could harm our business.
We depend on the continued service and performance of our key
personnel, including Timothy Sullivan, our President and Chief
Executive Officer. We do not maintain key man insurance on any
of our officers or key
26
employees. We also do not have long-term employment agreements
with any of our officers or key employees. In addition, much of
our key technology and systems are custom-made for our business
by our personnel. The loss of key personnel, including key
members of our management team, as well as certain of our key
marketing, sales, product development or technology personnel,
could disrupt our operations and have an adverse effect on our
ability to grow our business.
Several of our key personnel have only recently been employed by
us, and we are still in the process of assimilating and
integrating these personnel into our operations. Our failure to
successfully integrate these key employees into our business
could adversely affect our business.
In addition, to execute our growth plan, we must attract and
retain highly qualified personnel. Competition for these
employees is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting
and retaining qualified personnel. We have from time to time in
the past experienced, and we expect to continue to experience in
the future, difficulty in hiring and retaining highly skilled
employees with appropriate qualifications. Many of the companies
with which we compete for experienced personnel have greater
resources than we have. In addition, in making employment
decisions, particularly in the Internet and high-technology
industries, job candidates often consider the value of the stock
options they are to receive in connection with their employment.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
relating to the expensing of stock options may discourage us
from granting the size or type of stock option awards that job
candidates may require to join our company. If we fail to
attract new personnel, or fail to retain and motivate our
current personnel, our business and future growth prospects
could be severely harmed.
We will be subject to additional regulatory compliance
matters, including Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, as a result of becoming a public company and our
management has limited experience managing a public company.
Failure to comply with these regulatory matters could harm our
business.
We have never operated as a public company and will incur
significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not
incur as a private company. Our management team and other
personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to
new compliance initiatives and to meeting the obligations that
are associated with being a public company, and we may not
successfully or efficiently manage our transition into a public
company. We expect rules and regulations such as the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to increase our legal and finance
compliance costs and to make some activities more
time-consuming. We may need to hire a number of additional
employees with public accounting and disclosure experience in
order to meet our ongoing obligations as a public company. For
example, we have recently employed an outside consultant and
expect to hire an additional employee to assist us in preparing
our provision for income taxes in a timely manner as a public
company. Furthermore, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 requires that our management report on, and our
independent auditors to attest to, the effectiveness of our
internal control structure and procedures for financial
reporting in our annual report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010.
Section 404 compliance may divert internal resources and
will take a significant amount of time and effort to complete.
We may not be able to successfully complete the procedures and
certification and attestation requirements of Section 404
by the time we will be required to do so. If we fail to do so,
or if in the future our chief executive officer, chief financial
officer or independent registered public accounting firm
determines that our internal controls over financial reporting
are not effective as defined under Section 404, we could be
subject to sanctions or investigations by the Nasdaq Stock
Market, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, or other
regulatory authorities. Furthermore, investor perceptions of our
company may suffer, and this could cause a decline in the market
price of our stock. Irrespective of compliance with
Section 404, any failure of our internal controls could
have a material adverse effect on our stated results of
operations and harm our reputation. If we are unable to
implement these changes effectively or efficiently, it could
harm our operations, financial reporting or financial results
and could result in an adverse opinion on internal controls from
our independent auditors. If we are unable to retain enough
independent directors to our board to meet the listing standards
of the Nasdaq Stock Market by the deadlines set by the exchange,
it could affect our continued listing on the exchange.
Our reported financial results may be adversely affected
by changes in accounting principles applicable to us.
Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board, or FASB, the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, the Securities and
27
Exchange Commission and various bodies formed to promulgate and
interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these
principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on
our reported financial results, and could affect the reporting
of transactions completed before the announcement of a change.
In addition, the SEC has announced a multi-year plan that could
ultimately lead to the use of International Financial Reporting
Standards by United States issuers in their SEC filings. Any
such change could have a significant effect on our reported
financial results.
Any
expenses or liability resulting from litigation could adversely
affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
From time to time, we may be subject to claims or litigation.
Any such claims or litigation may be time-consuming and costly,
divert management resources, require us to change our products
and services, require us to accept returns of software products,
or have other adverse effects on our business. Any of the
foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and could require us to pay significant monetary
damages. For example, we have recently received a letter from
Shutterfly, Inc., alleging infringement by our MyCanvas.com
website. Based on our investigation to date, we believe that the
identified claims either are not valid or are not currently
infringed by us and we do not believe that the resolution of
these claims will have a material impact on our financial
condition. While MyCanvas.com revenues have represented a small
percentage of our total revenue, intellectual property
litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and there can
be no assurance that the expenses associated with defending any
litigation or the resolution of this dispute would not have a
material adverse impact on our results of operations or cash
flows. In addition, on September 16, 2009, we settled a
claim with respect to the timeliness and accuracy of a content
index we created. The settlement resulted in an expense of
approximately $2.3 million in 2009. See
Business Legal Proceedings.
Risks
Related to Intellectual Property
If our intellectual property and technologies are not
adequately protected to prevent use or appropriation by our
competitors, the value of our brand and other intangible assets
may be diminished, and our business may be adversely
affected.
Our future success and competitive position depend in part on
our ability to protect our proprietary technologies and
intellectual property. We rely and expect to continue to rely on
a combination of confidentiality and license agreements with our
employees, consultants and third parties with whom we have
relationships, as well as trademark, copyright, patent and trade
secret protection laws, to protect our proprietary technologies
and intellectual property. In the United States, we currently
have three patents issued, and we have a number of patents
pending relating to digitization, indexing, storage,
correlation, search and display of content. Ancestry.com,
myfamily.com and Family Tree Maker are among our registered
trademarks. In addition, in the United States, we have filed
various trademark applications for certain aspects of our
technologies, and we have also filed trademark applications in
certain foreign countries for the Ancestry and other website
names. Many of our trademarks contain words or terms having a
common usage and, as a result, may not be protectable under
applicable law. Because of this concern, we have elected not to
file applications with respect to certain of our trademarks, and
some of our trademarks for which we have filed applications may
not be protectable. We also possess intellectual property rights
in aspects of our digital content, search technology, software
products and digitization and indexing processes. However, our
digital content is not protected by any registered copyrights or
other registered intellectual property or statutory rights.
Rather, our digital content is protected by user agreements that
limit access to and use of our data, and by our proprietary
indexing and search technology that we apply to make our digital
content searchable. Compliance with use restrictions is
difficult to monitor, and our proprietary rights in our digital
content databases may be more difficult to enforce than other
forms of intellectual property rights.
There can be no assurance that the steps we take will be
adequate to protect our technologies and intellectual property,
that our patent and trademark applications will lead to issued
patents and registered trademarks, that others will not develop
or patent similar or superior technologies, products or
services, or that our patents, trademarks and other intellectual
property will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by
others. Furthermore, the intellectual property laws of other
countries at which our websites are or may be in the future be
directed may
28
not protect our products and intellectual property rights to the
same extent as the laws of the United States. The legal
standards relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of
protection of intellectual property rights in Internet-related
industries are uncertain and still evolving, both in the United
States and in other countries. In addition, third parties may
knowingly or unknowingly infringe our patents, trademarks and
other intellectual property rights, and litigation may be
necessary to protect and enforce our intellectual property
rights. Any such litigation could be very costly and could
divert management attention and resources. If the protection of
our technologies and intellectual property is inadequate to
prevent use or appropriation by third parties, the value of our
brand and other intangible assets may be diminished and
competitors may be able to more effectively mimic our
subscription products and methods of operations. Any of these
events would have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We also expect that the more successful we are, the more likely
it will become that competitors will try to develop products
that are similar to ours, which may infringe on our proprietary
rights. It may also be more likely that competitors will claim
that our products infringe on their proprietary rights. If we
are unable to protect our proprietary rights or if third parties
independently develop or gain access to our or similar
technologies, our business, revenue, reputation and competitive
position could be harmed.
Confidentiality agreements with employees and others may
not adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other
proprietary information. Failure to protect our proprietary
information could make it easier for third parties to compete
with our products and harm our business.
A substantial amount of our tools and technologies are protected
by trade secret laws. In order to protect our proprietary
technologies and processes, we rely in part on security
measures, as well as confidentiality agreements with our
employees, licensees, independent contractors and other
advisors. These measures and agreements may not effectively
prevent disclosure of confidential information, including trade
secrets, and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of
unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. We could
potentially lose future trade secret protection if any
unauthorized disclosure of such information occurs. In addition,
others may independently discover our trade secrets and
proprietary information, and in such cases we could not assert
any trade secret rights against such parties. Laws regarding
trade secret rights in certain markets in which we operate may
afford little or no protection to our trade secrets. The loss of
trade secret protection could make it easier for third parties
to compete with our products by copying functionality. In
addition, any changes in, or unexpected interpretations of, the
trade secret and other intellectual property laws in any country
in which we operate may compromise our ability to enforce our
trade secret and intellectual property rights. Costly and
time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and
determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to
obtain or maintain trade secret protection could adversely
affect our business, revenue, reputation and competitive
position.
Intellectual property claims against us could be costly
and result in the loss of significant rights related to, among
other things, our websites and marketing and advertising
activities.
Trademark, copyright, patent and other intellectual property
rights are important to us and other companies. Our intellectual
property rights extend to our technologies, business processes
and the content on our websites. We use intellectual property
licensed from third parties in merchandising our products and
marketing and advertising our services. From time to time, third
parties may allege that we have violated their intellectual
property rights. See Business Legal
Proceedings. If there is a claim against us for
infringement, misappropriation, misuse or other violation of
third party intellectual property rights, and we are unable to
obtain sufficient rights or develop non-infringing intellectual
property or otherwise alter our business practices on a timely
basis, our business and competitive position may be adversely
affected. Many companies are devoting significant resources to
obtaining patents that could potentially affect many aspects of
our business. There are numerous patents that broadly claim
means and methods of conducting business on the Internet. We
have not exhaustively searched patents relevant to our
technologies and business. If we are forced to defend ourselves
against intellectual property infringement claims, whether they
are with or without merit or are determined in our favor, we may
face costly litigation, diversion of technical and management
personnel, limitations on our ability to use our current
websites or inability to market or provide our products or
services. As a result of any such dispute, we may have to
develop non-infringing technology, pay damages, enter into
royalty or licensing agreements, cease providing certain
products or
29
services, adjust our merchandizing or marketing and advertising
activities or take other actions to resolve the claims. These
actions, if required, may be costly or unavailable on terms
acceptable to us. In addition, many of our co-branding,
distribution and other partnering agreements require us to
indemnify our partners for third-party intellectual property
infringement claims, which could increase the cost to us of an
adverse ruling in such an action.
In addition, as a publisher of online content, we face potential
liability for negligence, copyright, patent or trademark
infringement or other claims based on the nature and content of
data and materials that we publish or distribute. These claims
could potentially arise with respect to both company-acquired
content and user-generated content. Litigation to defend these
claims could be costly and any other liabilities we incur in
connection with the claims may harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to protect our domain names, our
reputation and brand could be affected adversely, which would
adversely affect our subscriber base, and therefore adversely
affect our revenues.
We have registered domain names for website destinations that we
use in our business, such as Ancestry.com, Genealogy.com and
myfamily.com. However, if we are unable to maintain our rights
in these domain names, our competitors could capitalize on our
brand recognition by using these domain names for their own
benefit. In addition, our competitors could capitalize on our
brand recognition by using domain names similar to ours. Domain
names similar to ours have been registered in the United States
and elsewhere, and in many countries the top-level domain names
ancestry or genealogy are owned by other
parties. Though we own the ancestry.co.uk domain
name in the United Kingdom, we might not be able to, or may
choose not to, acquire or maintain other country-specific
versions of the ancestry and genealogy
domain names. Further, the relationship between regulations
governing domain names and laws protecting trademarks and
similar proprietary rights varies from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction and is unclear in some jurisdictions. We may be
unable to prevent third parties from acquiring and using domain
names that infringe on, are similar to, or otherwise decrease
the value of, our brand or our trademarks or service marks.
Protecting and enforcing our rights in our domain names and
determining the rights of others may require litigation, which
could result in substantial costs and divert management
attention. We may not prevail if any such litigation is
initiated.
Risks
Related to this Offering and our Common Stock
An active, liquid and orderly trading market for our
common stock may not develop, our share price may be volatile
and you may be unable to sell your shares at or above the
offering price.
Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for
our common stock. We cannot predict the extent to which a
trading market will develop or how liquid that market might
become. The initial public offering price for our shares will be
determined by negotiations between us and representatives of the
underwriters and may not be indicative of prices that will
prevail in the trading market. The market price of shares of our
common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response
to many risk factors listed in this section and others beyond
our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our key operating metrics,
financial condition and operating results;
|
|
|
|
a greater than expected loss of existing subscribers;
|
|
|
|
a negative change in one or more of our key metrics;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes in our growth rate;
|
|
|
|
issuance of new or updated research or reports by securities
analysts;
|
|
|
|
our announcement of actual results for a fiscal period that are
higher or lower than projected or expected results or our
announcement of revenue or earnings guidance that is higher or
lower than expected;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by
investors to be comparable to us;
|
|
|
|
share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent
trading volume levels of our shares;
|
|
|
|
sales or expected sales of additional common stock;
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
announcements from, or operating results of, our
competitors; or
|
|
|
|
general economic and market conditions.
|
Furthermore, the stock markets have experienced extreme price
and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to
affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies.
These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate
to the operating performance of those companies. These broad
market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic,
political and market conditions such as recessions, interest
rate changes or international currency fluctuations, may cause
the market price of shares of our common stock to decline. If
the market price of shares of our common stock after this
offering does not exceed the initial public offering price, you
may not realize any return on your investment in us and may lose
some or all of your investment. In the past, companies that have
experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have
been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be
the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities
litigation against us could result in substantial costs and
divert our managements attention from other business
concerns, which could seriously harm our business.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research
or reports about our business, or if they change their
recommendations regarding our stock adversely, our stock price
and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by
the research and reports that industry or securities analysts
publish about us or our business. We do not currently have any
and may never obtain research coverage by industry or financial
analysts. If no or few analysts commence coverage of us, the
trading price of our stock would likely decrease. Even if we do
obtain analyst coverage, if one or more of the analysts who
cover us downgrade our stock, our stock price would likely
decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our
company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could
lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could
cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.
Substantial future sales of our common stock in the public
market could cause our stock price to fall.
Additional sales of our common stock in the public market after
this offering, or the perception that these sales could occur,
could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
Upon completion of this offering (assuming no exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option), we will have
42,402,916 shares of common stock outstanding. The
7,407,407 shares sold in this offering, as well as any shares
disposed of upon exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option, will be freely transferable without
restriction or additional registration under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act). The
remaining shares of common stock outstanding after this offering
will be available for sale as follows (assuming no exercise of
the underwriters over-allotment option):
|
|
|
Date of Availability for
Sale
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
180 days after the date of this prospectus (subject to
extension upon the occurrence of specified events) due to the
release of the
lock-up
agreement these stockholders have with the underwriters
|
|
11,131,719
|
180 days after the date of this prospectus (subject to
extension upon the occurrence of specified events) due to the
release of the lock-up agreement these stockholders have with
the underwriters that are held by affiliates and therefore
subject to volume restrictions under Rule 144
|
|
23,566,030
|
In addition, the approximately 12,446,734 million shares
underlying options that are either subject to the terms of our
equity compensation plans or reserved for future issuance under
our equity compensation plans as of the date of this prospectus
will become eligible for sale in the public market to the extent
permitted by the provisions of various option agreements, the
lock-up
agreements and Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act.
At any time and without public notice, any or all of the shares
subject to the
lock-up may
be released prior to expiration of the
180-day
lock-up
period at the discretion of Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated. As resale restrictions end, the market price of
our common stock could decline if the holders of those shares
sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell
them. In addition, after this offering (assuming no exercise of
the underwriters over-allotment option), the holders of
approximately 35 million shares of common stock will be
entitled to rights to cause us to register the sale of those
shares under the Securities Act but
31
cannot exercise any such registration rights during the
180-day
lock-up period. Registration of these shares under the
Securities Act would result in these shares becoming freely
tradable without restriction under the Securities Act
immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration.
Our
principal stockholder and its affiliates will likely control our
company after this offering and their interests may not always
coincide with the interests of the other holders of our common
stock.
As of September 30, 2009, Spectrum Equity Investors V,
L.P. and certain of its affiliates beneficially owned in the
aggregate shares representing approximately 67% of our
outstanding voting power. Two persons associated with Spectrum
Equity Investors V, L.P. currently serve on our board of
directors. After this offering, Spectrum Equity
Investors V, L.P. and certain of its affiliates will
beneficially own in the aggregate shares representing
approximately 54.8% of our outstanding voting power, or
approximately 53.2%, if the underwriters exercise their
over-allotment option in full. As a result, Spectrum Equity
Investors V, L.P. and certain of its affiliates could
control all matters presented to our stockholders for approval,
including election and removal of our directors and change of
control transactions. The interests of Spectrum Equity
Investors V, L.P. and certain of its affiliates may not
always coincide with the interests of the other holders of our
common stock.
As a
new investor, you will experience immediate and substantial
dilution.
Purchasers in this offering will immediately experience
substantial dilution in net tangible book value. Because our
common stock has in the past been sold at prices substantially
lower than the initial public offering price that you will pay,
you will suffer immediate dilution of $15.77 per share in net
tangible book value, based on an assumed initial offering price
of $13.50 per share of common stock. The exercise of
outstanding options, 5,976,194 of which are outstanding and
exercisable as of September 30, 2009, may result in further
dilution.
Management may apply our net proceeds from this offering
to uses that do not increase our market value or improve our
operating results.
We expect to use $12.1 million of the net proceeds we
receive to repay a portion of the amount outstanding under our
credit facility. We intend to use the remainder for general
corporate purposes, including as yet undetermined amounts
related to working capital and capital expenditures. Our
management will have considerable discretion in applying our net
proceeds and you will not have the opportunity, as part of your
investment decision, to assess whether we are using our net
proceeds appropriately. Until the net proceeds we receive are
used, they may be placed in investments that do not produce
income or that lose value. We may use our net proceeds for
purposes that do not result in any increase in our results of
operations, which could cause the price of our common stock to
decline.
Delaware law and our corporate charter and bylaws will
contain anti-takeover provisions that could delay or discourage
takeover attempts that stockholders may consider
favorable.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws that
we intend to adopt before the completion of this offering may
have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or
changes in our management. For example, our board of directors
will have the authority to issue up to
five million shares of preferred stock in one or more
series and to fix the powers, preferences and rights of each
series without stockholder approval. The ability to issue
preferred stock could discourage unsolicited acquisition
proposals or make it more difficult for a third party to gain
control of our company, or otherwise could adversely affect the
market price of our common stock. Our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation will require that any action to be
taken by stockholders must be taken at a duly called meeting of
stockholders, which may only be called by our board of
directors, the chairperson of our board of directors or the
chief executive officer with the concurrence of a majority of
our board of directors, and may not be taken by written consent.
Our amended and restated bylaws will require that any
stockholder proposals or nominations for election to our board
of directors must meet specific advance notice requirements and
procedures, which make it more difficult for our stockholders to
make proposals or director nominations. In addition, we will
have a classified board of directors with three-year staggered
terms, which could delay the ability of stockholders to change
membership of a majority of our board of directors. For
additional information, please see Description of Capital
Stock.
32
Furthermore, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are
governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law. These provisions may prohibit or
restrict large stockholders, in particular those owning 15% or
more of our outstanding voting stock, from merging or combining
with us. These provisions in our certificate of incorporation
and bylaws and under Delaware law could discourage potential
takeover attempts and could reduce the price that investors
might be willing to pay for shares of our common stock in the
future and result in our market price being lower than it would
without these provisions.
We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common
stock and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on
your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our
common stock.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock and do not intend to do so for the foreseeable future. We
currently intend to invest our future earnings, if any, to fund
our growth. In addition, the provisions of our credit facility
prohibit us from paying cash dividends. Therefore, you are not
likely to receive any dividends on your common stock for the
foreseeable future and the success of an investment in shares of
our common stock will depend upon any future appreciation in
their value. There is no guarantee that shares of our common
stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at
which our stockholders have purchased their shares.
33
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus, including the sections entitled
Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and
Business, contains forward-looking statements. We
may, in some cases, use words such as project,
believe, anticipate, plan,
expect, estimate, intend,
should, would, could,
potentially, will or may, or
other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes
to identify these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements in this prospectus include statements about:
|
|
|
|
|
our future financial performance, including our revenues, cost
of revenues, operating expenses and ability to sustain
profitability;
|
|
|
|
our rate of revenue growth;
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract and retain subscribers;
|
|
|
|
our ability to generate additional revenues on a cost-effective
basis;
|
|
|
|
our ability to acquire content and make it available online;
|
|
|
|
the success of our promotional programs and new products;
|
|
|
|
disruptions in our services;
|
|
|
|
our international expansion plans;
|
|
|
|
success with respect to any future acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain and hire necessary employees;
|
|
|
|
our ability to adequately protect our intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
the impact of claims or litigation;
|
|
|
|
our liquidity and working capital requirements; and
|
|
|
|
the effect of laws applying to our business.
|
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee
future results, level of activity, performance or achievements.
There are a number of important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from the results anticipated by
these forward-looking statements, which statements apply only as
of the date of this prospectus. These important factors include
those that we discuss in this prospectus under the caption
Risk Factors and elsewhere. You should read these
factors and the other cautionary statements made in this
prospectus as being applicable to all related forward-looking
statements wherever they appear in this prospectus. If one or
more of these factors materialize, or if any underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results, performance or
achievements may vary materially from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as
required by law.
34
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds we receive from this offering
will be approximately $48.4 million based on the assumed
initial public offering price of $13.50 per share, which is
the midpoint of the range included on the cover page of this
prospectus after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
If the underwriters option to purchase additional shares
in this offering from us is exercised, our estimated net
proceeds will be approximately $56.1 million after
deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We will not
receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock
by the selling stockholders. A $1.00 increase or decrease in the
assumed initial public offering price of $13.50 per share
would increase or decrease the net proceeds we receive from this
offering by approximately $3.8 million, assuming the number
of shares offered by us as set forth on the cover page of this
prospectus remains the same and after deducting the estimated
underwriter discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
We expect to use $12.1 million of the net proceeds we
receive to repay a portion of the amount outstanding under our
credit and guarantee agreement with CIT Lending Services
Corporation, as Administrative Agent, and certain other
financial institutions. This credit facility has a maturity date
of December 5, 2012 and had an outstanding balance of
approximately $114.7 million and an interest rate of
approximately 4.0% as of September 30, 2009.
We expect to use the remainder of the net proceeds for working
capital and general corporate purposes. We may also use a
portion of the proceeds to expand our current business through
acquisitions or investments in other strategic businesses,
products or technologies. We have no commitments with respect to
any acquisitions at this time. We will have broad discretion in
the way we use the net proceeds.
We intend to invest the net proceeds in short- and
intermediate-term interest-bearing obligations, investment-grade
instruments, certificates of deposit or guaranteed obligations
of the United States government, pending their use as described
above.
The primary purposes of this offering are to raise additional
capital, create a public market for our common stock, allow us
easier and quicker access to the public markets should we need
more capital in the future, increase the profile and prestige of
our company with existing and possible future registered users,
vendors and strategic partners, and make our stock more valuable
and attractive to our employees and potential employees for
compensation purposes.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock. Our credit facility prohibits us from paying cash
dividends. We currently expect to retain future earnings to
finance the growth and development of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the
discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent on
then-existing conditions.
35
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents,
our current portion of long-term debt and capitalization at
September 30, 2009 on:
|
|
|
|
|
an actual basis (after giving effect to the 1-for-2 reverse
split of our common stock to be effective upon consummation of
this offering); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
an as adjusted basis to give effect to (i) the sale by us
of 4,074,074 shares of common stock in this offering and
our receipt of the estimated net proceeds from that sale after
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us, (ii) the filing of
our amended and restated certificate of incorporation upon
consummation of the offering and (iii) our use of
$12.1 million of the net proceeds to repay a portion of the
amount outstanding under our credit agreement.
|
You should read this table in conjunction with the financial
statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As adjusted
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
60,593
|
|
|
$
|
96,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
12,028
|
|
|
$
|
10,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
102,641
|
|
|
$
|
91,810
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 and 175,000,000
shares authorized, actual and as adjusted, 38,328,842 issued and
outstanding, actual, and 42,402,916 issued and outstanding, as
adjusted
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 and
5,000,000 shares authorized, zero and zero issued and
outstanding, actual and as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
223,471
|
|
|
|
271,867
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
13,305
|
|
|
|
13,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
236,814
|
|
|
|
285,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
339,455
|
|
|
$
|
377,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public
price of $13.50 per share, the midpoint of the range set forth
on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase or decrease
the amount of cash and cash equivalents by approximately
$2.8 million, total stockholders equity by
approximately $3.8 million, and long term debt (including
current portion) by approximately $1.0 million, assuming
the number of shares offered by us as set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus remains the same and after deducting the
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
expenses payable by us.
36
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock, you will be diluted to the
extent the initial public offering price per share of our common
stock exceeds the net tangible book value per share of our
common stock immediately after this offering. Our net tangible
book value as of September 30, 2009 was a deficit of
approximately $(144.6) million, or $(3.77) per share of
common stock. The net tangible book value per share represents
the amount of our tangible net worth, or total tangible assets
less total liabilities, divided by 38,328,842 shares of our
common stock outstanding as of that date.
After giving effect to the issuance and sale of
4,074,074 shares of our common stock sold by us in this
offering and our receipt of the estimated net proceeds from such
sale, based on an assumed public offering price of $13.50 per
share (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of
this prospectus), and after deducting the estimated underwriting
discount and commission and the estimated expenses of the
offering, our as adjusted net tangible book value per share as
of September 30, 2009 would have been approximately $(2.27)
per share. This amount represents an immediate increase in net
tangible book value of $1.50 per share to existing stockholders
and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $15.77
per share to new investors purchasing shares of our common stock
in this offering. Dilution per share is determined by
subtracting the net tangible book value per share as adjusted
for this offering from the amount of cash paid by a new investor
for a share of our common stock. Net tangible book value is not
affected by the sale of shares of our common stock offered by
the selling stockholders. The following table illustrates the
per share dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.50
|
|
Net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
(3.77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to
new investors
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of $13.50 per share would increase (decrease) our
net tangible book value by $3.8 million, the net tangible
book value per share after this offering by $0.09 and the
dilution per share to new investors by $0.91, assuming the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting the
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us.
The following table summarizes as of September 30, 2009,
after giving effect to the offering:
|
|
|
|
|
the total number of shares of common stock purchased from us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the total consideration paid to us before deducting estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions payable by us of
$3.9 million and estimated offering expenses of
approximately $2.8 million; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the average price per share paid by existing stockholders and by
new investors who purchase shares of common stock in this
offering at the assumed initial public offering price of $13.50
per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Share
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
38,328,842
|
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
|
$
|
206,521
|
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
$
|
5.39
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
4,074,074
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
13.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
42,402,916
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
261,521
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
6.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The foregoing table does not reflect proceeds to be realized by
existing stockholders in connection with the sales by them in
this offering, options outstanding under our stock option plans
or stock options to be granted after the offering. As of
September 30, 2009, there were 10,326,588 options
outstanding with an average exercise price of $5.21 per
share.
37
UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
The following supplemental unaudited consolidated pro forma
statements of operations data have been developed by applying
pro forma adjustments to our historical consolidated statements
of operations. The Spectrum investment, which occurred on
December 5, 2007, has been accounted for as a business
combination. As a result of the Spectrum investment, we applied
purchase accounting standards which required a new basis of
accounting resulting in assets and liabilities being recorded at
their respective fair values at the investment date. Although
our operations did not change as a result of the Spectrum
investment, the accompanying unaudited consolidated pro forma
financial data is presented for the predecessor and
successor relating to the periods preceding and
succeeding the Spectrum investment, respectively. The unaudited
consolidated pro forma statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2007 gives effect to the Spectrum
investment as if it had occurred on January 1, 2007.
Assumptions underlying the pro forma adjustments are described
in the accompanying notes, which should be read in conjunction
with this unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data.
The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based upon available
information and certain assumptions that we believe are
reasonable. The unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data
is presented for supplemental informational purposes only. The
unaudited consolidated pro forma financial data does not purport
to represent what our results of operations would have been had
the Spectrum investment actually occurred on January 1,
2007, and they do not purport to project our results of
operations or financial condition for any future period. The
unaudited consolidated pro forma statements of operations should
be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, as well as Selected Consolidated
Financial Data and our audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus. All pro forma adjustments and their underlying
assumptions are described more fully in the notes to our
unaudited consolidated pro forma statements of operations.
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Period from Jan. 1,
|
|
|
Period from Dec. 6,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
2007 through Dec. 5,
|
|
|
2007 through Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription revenues
|
|
$
|
141,141
|
|
|
$
|
11,692
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
152,833
|
|
Product and other revenues
|
|
|
12,269
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
153,410
|
|
|
|
12,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,380
|
|
Costs of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of subscription revenues
|
|
|
33,590
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
160
|
(1)
|
|
|
36,212
|
|
Cost of product and other revenues
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
36,142
|
|
|
|
2,962
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
39,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
117,268
|
|
|
|
10,008
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
127,116
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
31,255
|
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
|
(1,018
|
)(1)(2)
|
|
|
33,754
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
42,400
|
|
|
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
50
|
(1)
|
|
|
45,607
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
20,723
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
99
|
(1)
|
|
|
22,964
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
20,387
|
(3)
|
|
|
24,061
|
|
Transaction related costs
|
|
|
9,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,530
|
)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
106,040
|
|
|
|
10,358
|
|
|
|
9,988
|
|
|
|
126,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
11,228
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
(10,148
|
)
|
|
|
730
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
(10,939
|
)(5)
|
|
|
(12,841
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
(1,992
|
)(6)
|
|
|
348
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
12,789
|
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
(23,079
|
)
|
|
|
(11,490
|
)
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(5,018
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
9,372
|
(7)
|
|
|
4,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
7,771
|
|
|
$
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,707
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents an increase in rent
expense due to the elimination of a deferred gain on the
sale/leaseback of our corporate headquarter facility of
$0.6 million recorded in 2007, of which $0.3 million
is included in technology and development expenses.
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents the elimination of
in-process research and development charges of $1.3 million
as a result of the Spectrum investment.
|
|
(3) |
|
Represents the net increase in
amortization expense due to fair value adjustments related to
long-lived intangible assets with definite lives. Identifiable
long-lived intangible assets are amortized either on a
straight-line basis or on the rate of attrition of subscribers
used to calculate the fair value of the intangible asset
resulting from the Spectrum investment.
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents the elimination of
non-recurring transaction costs that were directly attributable
to the Spectrum investment.
|
|
(5) |
|
Reflects the net increase in
interest expense resulting from interest expense on the
long-term debt entered into in connection with the Spectrum
investment offset by actual interest expense incurred on
predecessor debt that was eliminated at the time of the Spectrum
investment.
|
|
(6) |
|
Reflects a reduction in interest
income resulting from the decrease in our cash and short-term
investment balances used in the Spectrum investment.
|
|
(7) |
|
Reflects the income tax effect of
the pro forma adjustments resulting in a pro forma effective tax
rate based on our combined federal and state statutory rate of
37%.
|
39
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The tables on the following pages set forth the consolidated
financial and operating data as of and for the periods
indicated. The consolidated statements of operations data
presented below for the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2005 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2004,
2005 and 2006 have been derived from our consolidated financial
statements, which have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, and which
are not included in this prospectus. The consolidated statements
of operations data presented below for the year ended
December 31, 2006, the predecessor period from
January 1, 2007 through December 5, 2007, the
successor period from December 6, 2007 through
December 31, 2007 and the year ended December 31,
2008, and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2007
and 2008 have been derived from our consolidated financial
statements, which have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP and which are included in this prospectus. The consolidated
statements of operations data for the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009 and the balance sheet data at
September 30, 2009 are derived from our unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments,
consisting of normal and recurring adjustments that we consider
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and
results of operations as of and for such periods. Operating
results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected
for the full 2009 fiscal year. See Risk Factors and
the notes to our consolidated financial statements. You should
read the consolidated financial data presented on the following
pages in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements,
the notes to our consolidated financial statements and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan. 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 6, 2007
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended Dec. 31,
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dec. 5, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription revenues
|
|
$
|
107,127
|
|
|
$
|
126,031
|
|
|
$
|
137,643
|
|
|
$
|
141,141
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,692
|
|
|
$
|
181,391
|
|
|
$
|
133,616
|
|
|
$
|
152,506
|
|
Product and other revenues
|
|
|
15,513
|
|
|
|
14,228
|
|
|
|
12,909
|
|
|
|
12,269
|
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
16,200
|
|
|
|
11,542
|
|
|
|
12,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
122,640
|
|
|
|
140,259
|
|
|
|
150,552
|
|
|
|
153,410
|
|
|
|
|
12,970
|
|
|
|
197,591
|
|
|
|
145,158
|
|
|
|
164,793
|
|
Costs of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of subscription revenues
|
|
|
22,190
|
|
|
|
25,205
|
|
|
|
27,344
|
|
|
|
33,590
|
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
38,187
|
|
|
|
27,699
|
|
|
|
29,755
|
|
Cost of product and other revenues
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
|
|
3,367
|
|
|
|
3,695
|
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
5,427
|
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
|
|
4,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
25,445
|
|
|
|
28,572
|
|
|
|
31,039
|
|
|
|
36,142
|
|
|
|
|
2,962
|
|
|
|
43,614
|
|
|
|
30,991
|
|
|
|
33,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
97,195
|
|
|
|
111,687
|
|
|
|
119,513
|
|
|
|
117,268
|
|
|
|
|
10,008
|
|
|
|
153,977
|
|
|
|
114,167
|
|
|
|
130,825
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
17,123
|
|
|
|
20,600
|
|
|
|
28,280
|
|
|
|
31,255
|
|
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
|
33,206
|
|
|
|
23,705
|
|
|
|
26,690
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
56,913
|
|
|
|
60,821
|
|
|
|
51,421
|
|
|
|
42,400
|
|
|
|
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
52,341
|
|
|
|
36,634
|
|
|
|
44,226
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
12,435
|
|
|
|
16,608
|
|
|
|
26,978
|
|
|
|
20,723
|
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
28,931
|
|
|
|
21,035
|
|
|
|
24,569
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
23,779
|
|
|
|
17,832
|
|
|
|
12,165
|
|
Transaction related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangibles
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
88,953
|
|
|
|
99,505
|
|
|
|
108,895
|
|
|
|
106,040
|
|
|
|
|
10,358
|
|
|
|
138,257
|
|
|
|
99,206
|
|
|
|
107,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
8,242
|
|
|
|
12,182
|
|
|
|
10,618
|
|
|
|
11,228
|
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
15,720
|
|
|
|
14,961
|
|
|
|
23,175
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,444
|
)
|
|
|
(1,357
|
)
|
|
|
(946
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
(12,355
|
)
|
|
|
(9,327
|
)
|
|
|
(4,784
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
7,861
|
|
|
|
13,230
|
|
|
|
12,744
|
|
|
|
12,789
|
|
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
|
|
6,248
|
|
|
|
19,151
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(2,928
|
)
|
|
|
(5,086
|
)
|
|
|
(4,595
|
)
|
|
|
(5,018
|
)
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
(1,845
|
)
|
|
|
(2,748
|
)
|
|
|
(6,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,933
|
|
|
$
|
8,144
|
|
|
$
|
8,149
|
|
|
$
|
7,771
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
12,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common
share:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In connection with the Spectrum
investment, we were recapitalized. As a result, the capital
structure of our predecessor is not comparable to that of the
successor. Accordingly, net income per common share is not
comparable or meaningful for periods prior to 2008 and has not
been presented.
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan. 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 6, 2007
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended Dec. 31,
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dec. 5, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA(1)
|
|
$
|
21,986
|
|
|
$
|
23,513
|
|
|
$
|
30,455
|
|
|
$
|
39,344
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,755
|
|
|
$
|
62,645
|
|
|
$
|
49,062
|
|
|
$
|
52,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash
flow(1)
|
|
|
(13,451
|
)
|
|
|
(3,586
|
)
|
|
|
4,212
|
|
|
|
14,025
|
|
|
|
|
1,774
|
|
|
|
31,712
|
|
|
|
28,018
|
|
|
|
23,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of subscription revenues
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
(1,082
|
)
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
3,206
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
2,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
3,213
|
|
|
$
|
(1,344
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,789
|
|
|
$
|
898
|
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
4,672
|
|
|
$
|
3,509
|
|
|
$
|
4,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Income from operations and net
income, and therefore adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow,
include an expense related to a settlement in the third quarter
of 2009 of a claim regarding the timeliness and accuracy of a
content index we created. The settlement resulted in an expense
of approximately $2.3 million in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
37,156
|
|
|
$
|
38,113
|
|
|
$
|
43,219
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,277
|
|
|
$
|
40,121
|
|
|
$
|
60,593
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
123,598
|
|
|
|
140,126
|
|
|
|
140,640
|
|
|
|
|
476,212
|
|
|
|
477,975
|
|
|
|
476,296
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
53,470
|
|
|
|
56,714
|
|
|
|
52,307
|
|
|
|
|
56,730
|
|
|
|
61,178
|
|
|
|
69,850
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
|
28,776
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
133,000
|
|
|
|
114,669
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
100,239
|
|
|
|
102,229
|
|
|
|
95,129
|
|
|
|
|
263,830
|
|
|
|
258,187
|
|
|
|
239,482
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
23,359
|
|
|
|
37,897
|
|
|
|
45,511
|
|
|
|
|
212,382
|
|
|
|
219,788
|
|
|
|
236,814
|
|
42
The following table presents a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA
and free cash flow to net income (loss), the most comparable
GAAP measure, for each of the periods identified. For additional
information, please see the discussion of adjusted EBITDA and
free cash flow in Prospectus Summary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan. 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 6, 2007
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended Dec. 31,
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Dec. 5, 2007
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow to net
income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,933
|
|
|
$
|
8,144
|
|
|
$
|
8,149
|
|
|
$
|
7,771
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
12,224
|
|
Interest (income) expense, net
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
(1,292
|
)
|
|
|
(1,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
11,483
|
|
|
|
8,695
|
|
|
|
4,038
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
|
|
4,595
|
|
|
|
5,018
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
2,748
|
|
|
|
6,927
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
5,147
|
|
|
|
7,598
|
|
|
|
9,559
|
|
|
|
10,594
|
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
10,732
|
|
|
|
8,153
|
|
|
|
8,092
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
4,767
|
|
|
|
6,489
|
|
|
|
7,094
|
|
|
|
|
1,974
|
|
|
|
30,046
|
|
|
|
22,439
|
|
|
|
17,346
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
|
|
(1,344
|
)
|
|
|
3,789
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
4,672
|
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
4,265
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(640
|
)
|
|
|
(1,259
|
)
|
|
|
(834
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Impairment of intangible assets and acquired in-process research
and development
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
21,986
|
|
|
$
|
23,513
|
|
|
$
|
30,455
|
|
|
$
|
39,344
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,755
|
|
|
$
|
62,645
|
|
|
$
|
49,062
|
|
|
$
|
52,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization of content database costs
|
|
$
|
(7,579
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,521
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,591
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(1,129
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,965
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,383
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,855
|
)
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(21,900
|
)
|
|
|
(11,873
|
)
|
|
|
(10,127
|
)
|
|
|
(10,572
|
)
|
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
(11,621
|
)
|
|
|
(7,358
|
)
|
|
|
(7,566
|
)
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
|
(1,246
|
)
|
|
|
(1,480
|
)
|
|
|
(1,031
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,068
|
)
|
|
|
(7,206
|
)
|
|
|
(6,624
|
)
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
(4,712
|
)
|
|
|
(2,225
|
)
|
|
|
(3,800
|
)
|
|
|
(3,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(8,985
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
(13,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,586
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,212
|
|
|
$
|
14,025
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,774
|
|
|
$
|
31,712
|
|
|
$
|
28,018
|
|
|
$
|
23,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion together with our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements about our business and operations.
Our actual results may differ materially from those we currently
anticipate as a result of many factors, including those we
describe under Risk Factors and elsewhere in this
prospectus. See Special Note Regarding Forward Looking
Statements.
Company
Overview
Ancestry.com is the worlds largest online resource for
family history, with more than one million paying
subscribers around the world as of September 30, 2009. Our
mission is to help everyone discover, preserve and share their
family history. Our subscribers use our proprietary online
platform, extensive digital historical record collection, and
easy-to-use technology to research their family histories, build
their family trees, collaborate with other subscribers, upload
their own records and publish and share their stories with their
families. We offer our service on a subscription basis,
typically annual or monthly. These subscribers are our primary
source of revenue. We charge each subscriber the full price for
their subscription at the commencement of their subscription
period and at each renewal date. The predominantly annual
commitments of our subscribers enhance managements
near-term visibility on our revenues and provide working capital
benefits, which we believe enable us to more effectively manage
the growth of our business.
We operated as The Generations Network, Inc., which we refer to
as the predecessor, until December 5, 2007. On
December 5, 2007, Generations Holding, Inc., which we refer
to as the successor, acquired The Generations Network, Inc. in
connection with an investment by Spectrum Equity
Investors V, L.P. and certain of its affiliates. The
successor was created for the sole purpose of acquiring The
Generations Network, Inc. and had no prior operations. As a
result of that transaction, which we refer to as the Spectrum
investment, Spectrum and certain of its affiliates currently
hold approximately 67% of the outstanding shares of our common
stock. As a result of the accounting for the Spectrum
investment, our fiscal year 2007 is divided into a predecessor
period from January 1, 2007 through December 5, 2007
and a successor period from December 6, 2007 through
December 31, 2007.
We have funded our operations primarily from cash flows from
operations during the last five years. Our revenues increased
from $122.6 million in 2004 to $197.6 million in 2008.
Our revenues were $145.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to $164.8 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The number of
subscribers on the Ancestry.com websites has increased from
approximately 460,000 in January 2004 to more than one million
as of September 30, 2009. Our average monthly revenue per
subscriber was $16.09 in 2008.
We believe our previous investments in technology and content
have provided us a foundation for a scalable business model that
will help us to increase our margins over the long term and
effectively manage our costs as our business grows. However, we
expect to continue to devote substantial resources and funds to
improving our technologies and product offerings and acquiring
new and relevant content, and also to expanding awareness of our
brand and category through marketing, which may reduce our
margins in the near term.
Key
Business Metrics
Our management regularly reviews a number of financial and
operating metrics, including the following key operating metrics
to evaluate our business, determine the allocation of resources,
make decisions regarding corporate strategies and evaluate
forward-looking projections. The following key operating metrics
reflect data with respect to the Ancestry.com websites and
exclude our other subscription-based websites, such as
myfamily.com and Geneology.com.
|
|
|
|
|
Total subscribers. A subscriber is an
individual who pays for renewable access to one of our
Ancestry.com websites. Total subscribers is defined as the
number of subscribers at the end of the relevant period.
|
|
|
|
Monthly churn. Monthly churn is a measure
representing the number of subscribers that cancel in the
quarter divided by the sum of beginning subscribers and
subscriber additions during the quarter. To arrive at
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
monthly churn, we divide the result by three. Management uses
this measure to determine the health of our subscriber base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average monthly revenue per
subscriber. Average monthly revenue per
subscriber is total subscription revenues earned in the period
from subscriptions to one of the Ancestry.com websites divided
by the average number of subscribers in the period, divided by
the number of months in the period. The average number of
subscribers for the period is calculated by taking the average
of the beginning and ending number of subscribers for the period.
|
|
|
|
Subscriber acquisition cost. Subscriber
acquisition cost is external marketing and advertising expense,
divided by total subscriber additions in the period. Management
uses this metric to determine the efficiency of our marketing
and advertising programs in acquiring new subscribers.
|
A significant number of our renewals occur in the first quarter
of each year. Because we recognize subscription revenues ratably
over the subscription period, this trend generally has not
resulted in a material seasonal impact on our revenues, but may
result in a seasonal effect on one or more of the key business
metrics described above.
The following represents our performance highlights for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Total subscribers
|
|
|
734,386
|
|
|
|
832,193
|
|
|
|
913,683
|
|
|
|
893,882
|
|
|
|
1,028,180
|
|
Subscriber additions
|
|
|
569,851
|
|
|
|
479,663
|
|
|
|
556,045
|
|
|
|
412,276
|
|
|
|
508,750
|
|
Monthly
churn(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Subscriber acquisition
cost(2)
|
|
$
|
49.29
|
|
|
$
|
70.96
|
|
|
$
|
71.99
|
|
|
$
|
69.46
|
|
|
$
|
68.32
|
|
Average monthly revenue per
subscriber(2)
|
|
$
|
14.52
|
|
|
$
|
14.83
|
|
|
$
|
16.09
|
|
|
$
|
15.95
|
|
|
$
|
16.50
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Monthly churn is the average
monthly churn for the quarters included in the periods shown.
Monthly churn is not comparable for the year ended
December 31, 2006 due to a change in the packaging of our
products and services, and accordingly, has not been presented.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Based on pro forma expenses and
revenues for 2007. See Unaudited Consolidated Pro Forma
Financial Data on page 38 of this prospectus.
|
Components
of Consolidated Statements of Operations
Revenues
Subscription revenues. We derive subscription
revenues primarily from providing access to our products and
services via our various Ancestry.com websites. Subscription
revenues are recognized ratably over the subscription period
which consists primarily of monthly and annual subscriptions,
net of estimated cancellations. We typically charge each
subscribers credit card for the full price for their
subscription at the commencement of their subscription period
and at each renewal date (whether annual or monthly), unless
they cancel their subscription before the renewal date. The
amount of unrecognized revenues is recorded in deferred revenue.
We generally record cancellations and returns as a reduction to
deferred revenues. When people sign up for trial subscriptions,
we automatically charge their credit card for a subscription at
the end of the trial period unless they cancel before the end of
the trial period. Registered users that accept the offer of a
14-day free
trial are not billed for services until after the
14-day trial
period. Revenue is recognized over the subscription period once
billed. No revenue is recognized or allocated to the
14-day free
trial period. Subscription revenues from our Ancestry.com
websites accounted for 94% of the total subscription revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2008. Subscription revenues
also include annual subscriptions to our myfamily.com website
and other subscription-based products and services.
A majority of our subscription revenues are derived from
subscribers in the United States. We attribute subscription
revenues by country based on the billing address of the
subscriber, regardless of which of our websites the person
subscribes. Revenues from subscribers in the United States, the
United Kingdom and other countries collectively were 82%, 14%
and 4% of our subscription revenues, respectively, in 2006
compared to 75%, 19% and 6%, respectively, in the period from
January 1, 2007 through December 5, 2007, 74%, 20% and
6%, respectively, in the period from December 6, 2007
through December 31, 2007 and 74%, 18% and 8%,
respectively, in 2008.
45
Revenues from subscribers in the United States, the United
Kingdom and other countries collectively were 74%, 18% and 8% of
our subscription revenues, respectively, in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to 75%, 17% and 8%,
respectively, in the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Product and other revenues. Product and other
revenues consist of sales of desktop software (Family Tree
Maker), DNA testing (Ancestry.com | DNA), books,
periodicals, certificates, our self-publishing products
(MyCanvas.com), advertising services and access to our family
history content on a
pay-per-view
basis, which is available on our United Kingdom and certain
other internationally directed websites. Revenues related to
these products are recognized upon shipment, delivery of genetic
results, shipment of magazine or delivery of online ad
impressions or granting of
pay-per-view
access, as applicable.
Cost
of Revenues
Cost of subscription revenues. Cost of
subscription revenues consist of amortization of our database
content costs, depreciation expense on web servers and
equipment, credit card processing fees, web hosting costs,
royalty costs on certain content licensed from others,
personnel-related costs for database content support and call
center personnel. Since January 1, 2007, our call center
has primarily functioned as a subscriber service organization. A
majority of the costs associated with our call center since
January 1, 2007 have been recorded in cost of subscription
revenues. We expect database content amortization and web
hosting costs to continue to increase in 2009 as we continue to
add database content and develop a redundant hosting location.
Cost of product and other revenues. Cost of
product and other revenues consist of our direct costs to
purchase the products, shipping costs, credit card processing
fees, personnel-related costs of warehouse personnel, warehouse
storage costs and royalties on products licensed from others.
Gross profit. Gross profit is the result of
total revenues minus our total cost of revenues.
Personnel-related costs for each category of cost of revenues
and operating expenses include salaries, bonuses, stock-based
compensation and employee benefit costs.
Operating
Expenses
Technology and development. Technology and
development expenses consist of personnel-related costs incurred
in product development, maintenance and testing of our websites,
enhancing our record search and linking technologies, developing
solutions for new product lines, internal information systems
and infrastructure, third-party development, and other
internal-use software systems. Technology and development
expenses also include depreciation of computer hardware and
purchased software. Our development costs are primarily based in
the United States and are primarily devoted to providing content
and tools for individuals to do family history research. We
expect our investment in technology and development to increase
in absolute dollars in future periods.
Marketing and advertising. Marketing and
advertising expenses consist primarily of direct expenses
related to online, television and print advertising, retention
marketing expenses, payments made to affiliates to generate new
subscribers and personnel-related expenses. Prior to
January 1, 2007, our call center was principally a sales
organization. The majority of the costs associated with the call
center prior to January 1, 2007 were recorded in marketing
and advertising. Marketing and advertising costs are principally
incurred in the United States, but we do have marketing and
advertising offices in Europe, Australia and Canada. We expect
marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars but to remain
relatively stable in the near future as a percentage of
revenues, except for an increase in marketing expenses primarily
in 2010 related to a one time payment we expect to make for
product integration on the U.S. version of the television
show Who Do You Think You Are? We do not control the
release of this television show and cannot be sure if or when it
will be released or if it will have any effect on our revenues
or results of operations. If our revenues increase as a result
of interest in Ancestry.com attributable to the airing of this
program, such increase may not be sustainable over time.
General and administrative. General and
administrative expenses consist principally of personnel-related
expenses for our executive, finance, legal, human resources and
other administrative personnel, as well as accounting and legal
professional fees and other general corporate expenses,
including settlement of legal claims. We expect our general and
administrative expenses to increase when we become a public
company as we expect our
46
accounting, legal and personnel-related expenses and directors
and officers insurance costs to increase as we institute and
monitor a more comprehensive compliance and board governance
function, maintain and review internal control over financial
reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and prepare and distribute periodic reports.
Amortization of acquired intangible
assets. Amortization of acquired intangible
assets is the amortization expense associated with subscriber
relationships and contracts, core technologies, and intangible
assets, including trademarks and tradenames, resulting from the
Spectrum investment.
Transaction related expenses. Transaction
related expenses consist of one-time costs of our predecessor
company associated with the Spectrum investment.
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest expense. Interest expense includes
the interest expense associated with our long-term debt and
amortization of debt-issuance costs.
Interest income. Interest income includes
interest earned on cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense
consists of federal and state income taxes in the United States
and taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with United States generally accepted accounting principles, or
GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and
expenses, and related disclosures. These estimates and
assumptions are often based on judgments that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances at the time made, but all
such estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and
unpredictable. Actual results may differ from those estimates
and assumptions, and it is possible that other professionals,
applying their own judgment to the same facts and circumstances,
could develop and support alternative estimates and assumptions
that would result in material changes to our operating results
and financial condition. We evaluate our estimates and
assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our estimates are based on
historical experience and various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.
We consider the assumptions and estimates associated with
recoverability of intangible assets, the period of amortization
of our database content costs, stock-based compensation and
income taxes to be our critical accounting estimates. For
further information on our significant accounting policies, see
Note 1 of the accompanying notes to our consolidated
financial statements.
Recoverability
of Intangible Assets, Including Goodwill
Intangible assets consist of acquisition costs related to
database costs, subscriber relationships and contracts,
technologies, trade names and trademarks, and other intangible
assets. Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are
measured at fair value at the date of acquisition. We amortize
all intangible assets, except for acquired subscriber
relationships, on a straight line basis over their expected
lives in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142). Acquired subscriber relationships
were amortized on a straight-line basis prior to the acquisition
of our predecessor and, subsequent to the acquisition, are
amortized based on the rate of attrition of subscribers used to
calculate the fair value of the intangible asset in the
acquisition and purchase price allocation. As of
December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively, we had
approximately $285.0 million and approximately
$285.5 million of goodwill and approximately $127.5 and
approximately $104.9 million of intangible assets with
estimable useful lives on our consolidated balance sheets.
We review our indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment
at least annually or as indicators of impairment exist based on
comparing the fair value of the asset to the carrying value of
the asset in accordance with SFAS 142. Goodwill is
currently our only indefinite-lived intangible asset. We perform
our annual goodwill impairment test in
47
the fourth quarter. Our goodwill impairment test requires the
use of fair-value techniques, which are inherently subjective.
Fair value was estimated in October 2008 using an equal
weighting of the income and market value approaches for our
company, which we account for as a single reporting unit. The
equal weighting of these two approaches reflects our view that
both these valuation methods provided a reasonable estimate of
fair value and were equally reliable methods.
Under the income approach, we calculated the fair value of our
reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future
cash flows. Under the market approach, we estimated the fair
value based on market multiples of revenue and earnings for
comparable publicly traded companies. The estimates and
assumptions used in our calculations included revenue growth
rates, expense growth rates, expected capital expenditures to
determine projected cash flows, expected tax rates, and an
estimated discount rate to determine present value of expected
cash flows. These estimates are based on historical experience,
our projections of future operating activity, and our weighed
average cost of capital based on returns on interest bearing
debt and common stock.
The valuation of goodwill could be affected if actual results
differ substantially from our estimates. Circumstances that
could affect the valuation of goodwill include, among other
things, a significant change in our business climate and buying
habits of our subscriber base along with increased costs to
provide systems and technologies required to support our content
and search capabilities. Based on our analysis in the fourth
quarter of 2008, no impairment of goodwill was indicated. We
have determined that a 10% change in our cash flow assumptions
or a marginal change in our discount rate as of the date of our
most recent goodwill impairment test would not have changed the
outcome of the test.
We evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived assets in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets (SFAS 144).
SFAS 144 requires recognition of impairment of long-lived
assets in the event that the net book value of such assets
exceeds the future undiscounted net cash flows attributable to
such assets. In accordance with SFAS 144, we recognize
impairment, if any, in the period of identification to the
extent the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the fair value of
such asset. Based on our analysis, we recorded an impairment of
approximately $1.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 related to a database content set we were
developing for release in China. The impairment was expensed to
cost of subscription revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2008. No impairment was indicated as of
December 31, 2007.
Period
of Amortization of Our Database Costs
Our database consists of historical information that has been
digitized and indexed to allow subscribers to search and view
our content online. Database costs include the costs to acquire
or license the historical data, costs incurred by our employees
or by third parties to scan the content, and costs to have the
content keyed and indexed in order to be searchable. Among the
most utilized content in our databases is the United States and
United Kingdom census records which are released by government
entities every ten years. We amortize our database costs on a
straight-line basis over ten years after the content is released
for viewing on our websites.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)).
Under the provisions of SFAS 123(R), stock-based
compensation cost for each award is estimated at the grant date
based on the awards fair value as calculated by the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is recognized as expense
over the requisite service period. The Black-Scholes model
requires various highly judgmental assumptions including fair
value of the underlying stock, volatility and expected option
life. If any of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model
change significantly, stock-based compensation expense is
adjusted accordingly and stock-based compensation expense may
differ materially in the future from that recorded in the
current period.
We adopted SFAS 123(R) prospectively as of January 1,
2006 and therefore have applied the valuation provisions of
SFAS 123(R) to all new options and to options that were
outstanding prior to the effective date that were subsequently
modified. For the year ended December 31, 2006, we had
variable stock options which
48
accounted for a de minimus amount of compensation expense. No
other periods were affected by variable stock options. We also
recorded non-cash compensation expense for the repurchase of
common stock within six months of the exercise of employee stock
options of approximately $3.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
In January 2006, we modified the terms of then-outstanding stock
options with exercise prices above $4.60, reducing the exercise
price of the options to $4.60. As a result of the modification
we recorded incremental compensation expense of
$0.4 million and $0.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and the period from January 1, 2007
through December 5, 2007, respectively, and a de minimus
amount for the period from December 6, 2007 through
December 31, 2007 and for the year ended December 31,
2008.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2008 and September 30,
2009 there was approximately $2.1 million,
$8.6 million and $9.4 million, respectively, of
unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to
non-vested stock option awards that we expect to be recognized
over a weighted average period of 3.1, 2.6 and 2.8 years,
respectively.
The following tables set forth the total non-cash compensation
expense included in the related financial statement line items,
which total non-cash compensation expense includes
SFAS 123(R) stock-based compensation expense, variable
stock options expense and compensation expense associated with
the repurchase of common stock described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
December 6,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 5,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of subscription
revenues
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
3,206
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
2,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,789
|
|
|
|
$
|
898
|
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
4,672
|
|
|
$
|
3,509
|
|
|
$
|
4,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimated the fair value of each option granted using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing method using the following
assumptions for the periods presented in the table below. We
have not set forth any assumptions for the successor period from
December 6, 2007 through December 31, 2007 because we
did not grant any options during that period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
through
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 5,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Expected life of options
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
4.2 years
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.6-5.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.6-4.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.4-3.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.2-3.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.5-3.7
|
%
|
As of each stock option grant date, we considered the fair value
of the underlying common stock, determined as described below,
in order to establish the option exercise price. As of each
stock option grant date, we reviewed an average of the disclosed
year-end volatility of a group of companies that we considered
peers based on a number of factors including, but not limited
to, similarity to us with respect to industry, business model,
stage of growth, financial risk or other factors, along with
considering the future plans of our company to determine the
appropriate volatility. The expected life was based on our
historical stock option activity. The risk-free interest rate
was determined by reference to the United States Treasury rates
with the remaining term approximating the expected life assumed
at the date of grant. In addition, we are required to estimate
the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for
those options expected to vest. We estimate the forfeiture rate
based on our historical
49
experience. Further, to the extent our actual forfeiture rate is
different from our estimate, stock-based compensation expense is
adjusted accordingly.
The following table sets forth all stock option grants since
January 1, 2006 through the date of this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Value per
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Fair Value per
|
|
Share at
|
Grant Date
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Share at Grant Date
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
February 14, 2006
|
|
|
147,500
|
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
March 30, 2006
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 25, 2006
|
|
|
215,250
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 27, 2006
|
|
|
335,000
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 21, 2006
|
|
|
136,500
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 17, 2006
|
|
|
97,500
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2007
|
|
|
91,750
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2007
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 19, 2007
|
|
|
81,000
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 27, 2008
|
|
|
3,489,121
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 29, 2008
|
|
|
86,250
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2008
|
|
|
240,750
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 3, 2008
|
|
|
361,500
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 5, 2008
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
|
|
568,000
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 13, 2009
|
|
|
212,168
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
7.36
|
|
|
|
1.86
|
|
May 27, 2009
|
|
|
646,000
|
|
|
|
7.36
|
|
|
|
7.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 20, 2009
|
|
|
362,000
|
|
|
|
8.54
|
|
|
|
8.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1, 2009
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
8.54
|
|
|
|
13.50
|
|
|
|
4.96
|
|
October 14, 2009
|
|
|
100,750
|
|
|
|
13.50
|
|
|
|
13.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
These estimates of the fair value of our common stock were made
based on information from the following valuation dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
Valuation Date
|
|
per Share
|
|
November 11, 2005
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
4.70
|
|
October 27, 2008
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
7.36
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
8.54
|
|
Since our common stock is not publicly traded, we considered
numerous objective and subjective factors in valuing our common
stock at each valuation date in accordance with the guidance in
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Practice
Aid Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities
Issued as Compensation, or Practice Aid. These objective and
subjective factors included, but were not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
arms-length sales of our common stock in privately
negotiated transactions;
|
|
|
|
valuations of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
our stage of development and financial position; and
|
|
|
|
our future financial projections.
|
On December 5, 2007, we acquired our predecessor for a
common stock price of $5.40 per share in connection with the
Spectrum investment. The Practice Aid indicates that a
third-party transaction between a willing buyer and a willing
seller is the best indication of the fair value of an
enterprise. At each grant date subsequent to the Spectrum
50
investment, our board of directors considered the objective and
subjective factors and determined that the $5.40 value was a
reasonable approximation of fair value until a new valuation was
performed in October 2008.
In the contemporaneous common stock valuations performed on
October 27, 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009, the fair value of our common stock was determined by
taking the average value calculated under two different
valuation approaches, the income approach and market approach,
with each method weighted equally. The equal weighting of these
two approaches reflects our view that both these valuation
methods provide a reasonable estimate of fair value, are equally
reliable and resulted in similar values.
|
|
|
|
|
The income approach quantified the present value of the future
cash flows that management expected to achieve. These future
cash flows were discounted to their present values using a rate
corresponding to our estimated weighted average cost of capital.
The discount rate reflects the risks inherent in the cash flows
and the market rates of return available from alternative
investments of similar type and quality as of the valuation
date. Our weighted average cost of capital was calculated by
weighting the required returns on interest-bearing debt and
common equity capital in proportion to their estimated
percentages in our capital structure. The weighted average cost
of capital used in the common stock valuations on
October 27, 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009 was 14.0%, 15.0% and 14.5%, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The market approach considered multiples of financial metrics
based on acquisition
and/or
trading multiples of a peer group of companies. These multiples
were then applied to our financial metrics to derive an
indication of value. The valuation on October 27, 2008
applied a weighting of 50% of the trailing twelve month (TTM)
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization
(EBITDA) and 50% of the forward twelve month (FTM) EBITDA to
indicate the value of invested capital. The multiples used in
the October 27, 2008 valuation for TTM EBITDA and FTM
EBITDA were 7.7x and 5.5x. The valuations on March 31, 2009
and June 30, 2009 applied a weighting of 10%, 40%, 10% and
40% to the TTM of revenue, TTM of EBITDA, next full year (NFY)
revenue, NFY EBITDA, respectively. These multiples were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Valuation
|
|
TTM Revenue
|
|
TTM EBITDA
|
|
NFY Revenue
|
|
NFY EBITDA
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
2.0x
|
|
7.5x
|
|
1.9x
|
|
7.0x
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
2.2x
|
|
7.5x
|
|
2.0x
|
|
7.0x
|
The resulting fair value obtained by averaging the values
calculated under the income approach and the market approach was
then discounted for the lack of marketability of the common
stock for being a private company. The marketability discount
was 34%, 10% and 10%, respectively, for the valuations on
October 27, 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009.
At each grant date from November 3, 2008 through
March 13, 2009, our board of directors considered objective
and subjective factors including the most recent contemporaneous
valuation of our common stock on October 27, 2008.
For the grants on May 27, 2009, our board of directors
considered objective and subjective factors including the most
recent contemporaneous valuation of our common stock on
March 31, 2009. The March 31, 2009 valuation was
higher than the October 27, 2008 valuation principally due
to the application of a much lower discount for marketability.
At the times of the prior valuation in October 2008 and grants
made from November 2008 through February 2009, our board of
directors believed that the likelihood of an initial public
offering in the near term was low, particularly given the
turmoil in the debt and equity capital markets and the
challenging economic environment during that period. While the
income factors used in our valuations did not change materially
between the October 2008 valuation and the March 2009
valuation, the discount for marketability in the March 2009
valuation was lowered to 10% compared to 34% in the
October 2008 valuation as a result of various initial
public filings being favorably received, indicating a
significant improvement in the market, and our board of
directors increased interest in pursuing a public offering of
our common stock in the nearer term.
Due to the proximity of the grant on March 13, 2009 to the
March 31, 2009 valuation and because in March 2009 our
board of directors became more optimistic that we could consider
an initial public offering in the nearer term, we decided to use
the March 31, 2009 common stock valuation as fair value in
our SFAS 123(R) calculation of stock compensation expense
for the March 13, 2009 grants. We determined, however, that the
February 11, 2009 option grant was properly granted at an
exercise price equal to the fair value determined as of
51
October 27, 2008, because at the time of grant the board of
directors believed the prospect of an initial public offering in
the near term was comparable to that at the time of the October
2008 valuation and that the decreased discount for marketability
used in the March 31, 2009 valuation was therefore not
appropriate to apply retrospectively to the February 11,
2009 grant.
For the grants on July 20 and September 1, 2009, our
board of directors considered objective and subjective factors
including the most recent contemporaneous valuation of our
common stock on June 30, 2009. The June 30, 2009
valuation was higher than the March 31, 2009 valuation
principally due to an increase in business enterprise value due
to continued improvements in the equity markets, and to a lesser
extent the company experiencing strong growth and cash flow.
For the grants on October 14, 2009, our board of directors
considered objective and subjective factors including the
midpoint of the proposed price range of the common stock in the
offering, developed in consultation with the underwriters. Due
to the proximity of the September 1, 2009 grants with the
expected initial public offering, we decided to use the
mid-point of
the range for the common stock in the offering as the fair value
for our SFAS 123(R) calculation of stock compensation
expense.
Assuming an initial public offering price of $13.50 per share,
the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of
this prospectus, the intrinsic value of the options outstanding
at September 30, 2009, was $85.6 million, of which
$52.7 million related to the options that were vested and
$32.9 million related to the options that were not vested.
Income
taxes
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and several
foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in
evaluating our uncertain tax positions and determining our
provision for income taxes. Financial Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48) contains a two-step approach to
recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for
in accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for
recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence
indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will
be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals
or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure
the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50%
likely of being realized upon settlement.
Although we believe we have adequately reserved for our
uncertain tax positions, no assurance can be given that the
final tax outcome of these matters will not be different. We
adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and
circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit, the
refinement of an estimate or changes in tax laws. To the extent
that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than
the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the provision
for income taxes in the period in which such determination is
made. The provision for income taxes includes the impact of
reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered
appropriate, as well as the related net interest.
In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, in
full or in part, we consider all available positive and negative
evidence, including our past operating results, our forecast of
future market growth, forecasted earnings, future taxable income
and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. The
assumptions utilized in determining future taxable income
require significant judgment and are consistent with the plans
and estimates we are using to manage the underlying businesses.
We believe it is more likely than not that the deferred tax
assets recorded on our balance sheet will ultimately be
realized. In the event we were to determine that we would not be
able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in
the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be
charged to earnings in the period in which we make such
determination.
Our effective tax rates have differed from the statutory tax
rate primarily due to the tax impact of foreign operations,
certain impairment charges, state taxes, and certain benefits
realized related to stock option activity. The effective tax
rates were 36.1%, 39.2% and 43.6% for the year ended
December 31, 2006, the period from January 1, 2007
through December 5, 2007 and the year ended
December 31, 2008, respectively. Our future effective tax
rates could be adversely affected by changes in the valuation of
our deferred tax assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws,
regulations, accounting principles or interpretations thereof.
In addition, we are subject to the continuous examination of our
income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax
authorities. We regularly
52
assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these
examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for
income taxes.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods presented, our
consolidated statements of operations. In the table below and
throughout this Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations:
consolidated statements of operations data for the year ended
December 31, 2006, the predecessor period from
January 1, 2007 through December 5, 2007, the
successor period from December 6, 2007 through
December 31, 2007 and the year ended December 31, 2008
have been derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements; the consolidated statement of operations data for
the nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2009
have been derived from our unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements; and our unaudited consolidated pro forma
financial data for the year ended December 31, 2007 have
been derived from our Unaudited Consolidated Pro Forma
Financial Data, each of which are included elsewhere in
this prospectus. The information contained in the table below
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes and Unaudited
Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Data on page 38 of
this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
December 6,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 5,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription revenues
|
|
$
|
137,643
|
|
|
$
|
141,141
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,692
|
|
|
$
|
152,833
|
|
|
$
|
181,391
|
|
|
$
|
133,616
|
|
|
$
|
152,506
|
|
Product and other revenues
|
|
|
12,909
|
|
|
|
12,269
|
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
13,547
|
|
|
|
16,200
|
|
|
|
11,542
|
|
|
|
12,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
150,552
|
|
|
|
153,410
|
|
|
|
|
12,970
|
|
|
|
166,380
|
|
|
|
197,591
|
|
|
|
145,158
|
|
|
|
164,793
|
|
Costs of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of subscription revenues
|
|
|
27,344
|
|
|
|
33,590
|
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
36,212
|
|
|
|
38,187
|
|
|
|
27,699
|
|
|
|
29,755
|
|
Cost of product and other revenues
|
|
|
3,695
|
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
5,427
|
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
|
|
4,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
31,039
|
|
|
|
36,142
|
|
|
|
|
2,962
|
|
|
|
39,264
|
|
|
|
43,614
|
|
|
|
30,991
|
|
|
|
33,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
119,513
|
|
|
|
117,268
|
|
|
|
|
10,008
|
|
|
|
127,116
|
|
|
|
153,977
|
|
|
|
114,167
|
|
|
|
130,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
28,280
|
|
|
|
31,255
|
|
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
|
|
33,754
|
|
|
|
33,206
|
|
|
|
23,705
|
|
|
|
26,690
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
51,421
|
|
|
|
42,400
|
|
|
|
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
45,607
|
|
|
|
52,341
|
|
|
|
36,634
|
|
|
|
44,226
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
26,978
|
|
|
|
20,723
|
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
22,964
|
|
|
|
28,931
|
|
|
|
21,035
|
|
|
|
24,569
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
24,061
|
|
|
|
23,779
|
|
|
|
17,832
|
|
|
|
12,165
|
|
Transaction related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
108,895
|
|
|
|
106,040
|
|
|
|
|
10,358
|
|
|
|
126,386
|
|
|
|
138,257
|
|
|
|
99,206
|
|
|
|
107,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
10,618
|
|
|
|
11,228
|
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
15,720
|
|
|
|
14,961
|
|
|
|
23,175
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(946
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
(12,841
|
)
|
|
|
(12,355
|
)
|
|
|
(9,327
|
)
|
|
|
(4,784
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
12,744
|
|
|
|
12,789
|
|
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
(11,490
|
)
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
|
|
6,248
|
|
|
|
19,151
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(4,595
|
)
|
|
|
(5,018
|
)
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
4,251
|
|
|
|
(1,845
|
)
|
|
|
(2,748
|
)
|
|
|
(6,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
8,149
|
|
|
$
|
7,771
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,303
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,239
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
12,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common
share:(1)
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In connection with the Spectrum
investment, we were recapitalized. As a result, the capital
structure of our predecessor is not comparable to that of the
successor. Accordingly, net income per common share is not
comparable or meaningful for periods prior to 2008 and has not
been presented.
|
53
The following table sets forth, for the periods presented, our
consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of total
revenues. The information contained in the table below should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
and the related notes and Unaudited Consolidated Pro Forma
Financial Data on page 38 of this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
December 6,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 5,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription revenues
|
|
|
91.4
|
%
|
|
|
92.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
90.1
|
%
|
|
|
91.9
|
%
|
|
|
91.8
|
%
|
|
|
92.0
|
%
|
|
|
92.5
|
%
|
Product and other revenues
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of subscription revenues
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
Cost of product and other revenues
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
79.4
|
|
|
|
76.4
|
|
|
|
|
77.2
|
|
|
|
76.4
|
|
|
|
77.9
|
|
|
|
78.7
|
|
|
|
79.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Transaction related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
72.3
|
|
|
|
69.1
|
|
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|
|
76.0
|
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
|
|
68.3
|
|
|
|
65.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2009
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009 Over 2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription revenues
|
|
$
|
133,616
|
|
|
$
|
152,506
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
Product and other revenues
|
|
|
11,542
|
|
|
|
12,287
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
145,158
|
|
|
$
|
164,793
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription revenues. The increase in our
subscription revenues of $18.9 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 was primarily the result of an
increase in the number of total subscribers and to some extent
an increase in higher monthly revenue per subscriber. A shift in
mix between annual and monthly subscriptions to more monthly
subscriptions as our subscriber base
54
broadened resulted in higher revenue per subscriber in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. However, we do not believe that
this trend was the result of specific marketing or advertising
campaigns targeted to increasing monthly subscriptions versus
annual subscriptions. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, changes in foreign currency exchange
rates had an unfavorable impact on subscription revenues. Had
average exchange rates remained the same in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 as average exchange rates in
effect in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our
reported revenues in the nine months ended September 30,
2009 would have been approximately 4.5% higher.
Product and other revenues. The increase in
product and other revenues of $0.7 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily due to an
increase in revenues associated with a new release in August
2009 of our Family Tree Maker desktop software of
$1.5 million, the growth of our vital records products,
introduced in the United Kingdom during August 2008, of
$1.0 million, and a $0.2 million increase in shipping
revenue, primarily resulting from increased sales of Family Tree
Maker and vital records products. These increases were offset by
decreases in our royalty revenue of $1.1 million and
advertising revenue of $0.9 million.
Cost
of Revenues and Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2009 Over 2008
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription revenues
|
|
$
|
133,616
|
|
|
$
|
152,506
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
Product and other revenues
|
|
|
11,542
|
|
|
|
12,287
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
145,158
|
|
|
|
164,793
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
Costs of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of subscription revenues
|
|
|
27,699
|
|
|
|
29,755
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Cost of product and other revenues
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
|
|
4,213
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
30,991
|
|
|
|
33,968
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
114,167
|
|
|
$
|
130,825
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit percentage
|
|
|
78.7
|
%
|
|
|
79.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of subscription revenues. The increase in
our cost of subscription revenues of $2.1 million in the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily due to a
$1.0 million increase in our web hosting costs, an increase
in amortization of content costs of $0.6 million and an
increase in equipment maintenance related costs of
$0.4 million.
Cost of product revenues. The increase in our
cost of product revenues of $0.9 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 was primarily due to a
$0.4 million increase as a result of the introduction of
our vital records products in the United Kingdom and a
$0.4 million increase in shipping costs.
55
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2009 Over 2008
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
$
|
23,705
|
|
|
$
|
26,690
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
36,634
|
|
|
|
44,226
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
21,035
|
|
|
|
24,569
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
|
17,832
|
|
|
|
12,165
|
|
|
|
(31.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
99,206
|
|
|
$
|
107,650
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and development. The increase in
technology and development expenses of $3.0 million in the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily the
result of an increase in personnel-related expenses resulting
from an increase in the number of technology and development
personnel at September 30, 2009 as compared to
September 30, 2008.
Marketing and advertising. The increase in
marketing and advertising expenses of $7.6 million in the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily
attributable to a $5.9 million increase in television and
online advertising, as well as a $1.2 million increase in
personnel-related expenses resulting from an increase in the
number of marketing and advertising personnel at
September 30, 2009 as compared to September 30, 2008.
General and administrative. The increase in
general and administrative expenses of $3.5 million in the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 is primarily the
result of a settlement of a claim related to a content index,
which resulted in an expense of $2.3 million, and to
increased personnel-related costs of $1.6 million due to an
increase in the number of general and administrative personnel.
These increases were offset by a change in foreign currency
gains and losses of $0.9 million from a loss of
$0.5 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2008 to a gain of $0.4 million in the nine month period
ended September 30, 2009.
Amortization of acquired intangible
assets. The decrease in amortization of acquired
intangible assets of $5.7 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 was due to the amortization of our
subscriber relationship intangible asset, which is amortized on
an accelerated basis. Subscriber relationships and contracts are
amortized based on an annual turnover rate, or rate of
attrition, of the subscribers that approximates our monthly
churn, resulting in an accelerated basis of amortization. This
is the same rate of attrition that was used to determine the
fair value of the intangible asset at the acquisition date. We
believe that recognizing amortization expense in this pattern
better matches the amortization expense with the revenue
generated from these subscribers. The subscriber relationship
asset was recorded in connection with the Spectrum investment.
Other
Income (Expense) and Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2009 Over 2008
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(9,327
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,784
|
)
|
|
|
(48.7
|
)%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|