Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Ancestry.com Inc. | Financial_Report.xls |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - Ancestry.com Inc. | c19756exv31w2.htm |
EX-10.2 - EX-10.2 - Ancestry.com Inc. | c19756exv10w2.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - Ancestry.com Inc. | c19756exv32w1.htm |
EX-10.3 - EX-10.3 - Ancestry.com Inc. | c19756exv10w3.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - Ancestry.com Inc. | c19756exv31w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-34518
Ancestry.com Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
26-1235962 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
360 West 4800 North Provo, Utah (Address of principal executive offices) |
84604 (Zip Code) |
(801) 705-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports)
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted
on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No þ
As of July 27, 2011, there were 45,452,304 shares of the registrants common stock, par
value $0.001, outstanding.
Ancestry.com Inc.
Table of Contents
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
12 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
25 | ||||||||
40 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
42 | ||||||||
43 | ||||||||
EX-10.2 | ||||||||
EX-10.3 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
ANCESTRY.COM INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 71,019 | $ | 65,519 | ||||
Restricted cash |
1,940 | 2,476 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $422 and
$406 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively |
5,679 | 6,990 | ||||||
Income tax receivable |
15,362 | 8,094 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
2,779 | 3,873 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
8,977 | 9,243 | ||||||
Total current assets |
105,756 | 96,195 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
19,234 | 21,252 | ||||||
Content database costs, net |
71,098 | 65,418 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
25,825 | 34,281 | ||||||
Goodwill |
302,802 | 303,374 | ||||||
Other assets |
2,010 | 1,666 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 526,725 | $ | 522,186 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 9,970 | $ | 9,451 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
38,224 | 36,978 | ||||||
Deferred revenues |
114,285 | 89,301 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
162,479 | 135,730 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
16,534 | 20,571 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
2,017 | 2,018 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
181,030 | 158,319 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 175,000 shares
authorized; 47,174 shares issued and 45,186 shares
outstanding at June 30, 2011 and 45,179 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
47 | 45 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
362,968 | 328,957 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,988 and zero shares at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
(78,095 | ) | | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
1,025 | 643 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
59,750 | 34,222 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
345,695 | 363,867 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 526,725 | $ | 522,186 | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
3
Table of Contents
ANCESTRY.COM INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Subscription revenues |
$ | 96,707 | $ | 70,544 | $ | 181,890 | $ | 130,104 | ||||||||
Product and other revenues |
4,601 | 3,916 | 10,446 | 8,777 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
101,308 | 74,460 | 192,336 | 138,881 | ||||||||||||
Costs of revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of subscription revenues |
14,111 | 11,228 | 27,998 | 22,729 | ||||||||||||
Cost of product and other revenues |
1,841 | 1,280 | 3,669 | 2,774 | ||||||||||||
Total cost of revenues |
15,952 | 12,508 | 31,667 | 25,503 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
85,356 | 61,952 | 160,669 | 113,378 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Technology and development |
14,242 | 9,992 | 27,910 | 19,919 | ||||||||||||
Marketing and advertising |
30,250 | 24,490 | 64,058 | 46,936 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
10,111 | 8,032 | 19,468 | 15,774 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
4,297 | 3,679 | 8,567 | 7,358 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
58,900 | 46,193 | 120,003 | 89,987 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
26,456 | 15,759 | 40,666 | 23,391 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other expense, net |
(429 | ) | (1,429 | ) | (536 | ) | (2,573 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income taxes |
26,027 | 14,330 | 40,130 | 20,818 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(9,470 | ) | (5,807 | ) | (14,602 | ) | (8,333 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,557 | $ | 8,523 | $ | 25,528 | $ | 12,485 | ||||||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.29 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
45,596 | 42,764 | 45,484 | 42,612 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
49,893 | 48,015 | 50,082 | 47,754 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
4
Table of Contents
ANCESTRY.COM INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,557 | $ | 8,523 | $ | 25,528 | $ | 12,485 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
3,188 | 2,740 | 6,452 | 5,604 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of content database costs |
2,279 | 1,830 | 4,415 | 3,664 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
4,297 | 3,679 | 8,567 | 7,358 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
69 | 614 | 138 | 829 | ||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(2,021 | ) | (1,487 | ) | (2,989 | ) | (2,637 | ) | ||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
2,201 | 1,262 | 3,926 | 2,266 | ||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
999 | 283 | 1,308 | 935 | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
44 | (99 | ) | 536 | (170 | ) | ||||||||||
Other assets |
(581 | ) | 403 | (233 | ) | 1,970 | ||||||||||
Income tax receivable |
(8,672 | ) | | (7,268 | ) | 1,544 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
24,563 | 4,200 | 23,148 | 8,188 | ||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
(16,393 | ) | (3,570 | ) | (20,449 | ) | (3,570 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred revenues |
5,054 | 4,654 | 24,906 | 19,088 | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
31,584 | 23,032 | 67,985 | 57,554 | ||||||||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Capitalization of content database costs |
(4,204 | ) | (2,349 | ) | (9,951 | ) | (5,141 | ) | ||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(3,693 | ) | (2,221 | ) | (4,418 | ) | (3,628 | ) | ||||||||
Purchases of short-term investments |
| (5,193 | ) | | (7,193 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds from sale and maturity of short-term
investments |
| 4,991 | | 10,037 | ||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(7,897 | ) | (4,772 | ) | (14,369 | ) | (5,925 | ) | ||||||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
7,290 | 4,858 | 10,022 | 5,072 | ||||||||||||
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of
stock-based awards |
(515 | ) | | (515 | ) | | ||||||||||
Principal payments on debt |
| (20,937 | ) | | (23,795 | ) | ||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
16,393 | 3,570 | 20,449 | 3,570 | ||||||||||||
Repurchases of common stock |
(78,095 | ) | | (78,095 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(54,927 | ) | (12,509 | ) | (48,139 | ) | (15,153 | ) | ||||||||
Effect of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates on cash and cash equivalents |
(4 | ) | | 23 | | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(31,244 | ) | 5,751 | 5,500 | 36,476 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
102,263 | 97,666 | 65,519 | 66,941 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 71,019 | $ | 103,417 | $ | 71,019 | $ | 103,417 | ||||||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 111 | $ | 476 | $ | 226 | $ | 1,477 | ||||||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
3,282 | 5,778 | 3,557 | 6,181 | ||||||||||||
Supplemental disclosures of noncash investing and
financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Capitalization of stock-based compensation |
9 | 2 | 18 | 3 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
Table of Contents
ANCESTRY.COM INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Ancestry.com Inc. (Ancestry or the company) is an online family history resource
that derives revenues primarily from providing online access to digitized historical records
on a subscription basis. Ancestry is a holding company and all operations are conducted by
its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company,
its wholly-owned subsidiaries and a variable interest entity. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period
amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. These
reclassifications did not have a significant impact on the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Unaudited Interim Financial Statements
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2011 and the
condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are unaudited. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) on the same basis as the audited
consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments
(all of which are considered of normal recurring nature) considered necessary to present
fairly the companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The results of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.
These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the
companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the 2010 Annual
Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Use of Estimates
The preparation of interim condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity
with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported and disclosed in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results
could differ materially from these estimates.
The company evaluates its estimates continually to determine their appropriateness,
including determination of the recoverability of indefinite-lived and long-lived assets, the
estimated useful lives of the companys intangible assets, determination of the fair value
of stock options, income taxes, and allowances for sales returns and uncollectible accounts
receivable. The company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for the
amounts recorded within the consolidated financial statements.
There have been no changes to the companys significant accounting policies as
described in the 2010 Annual Report except as disclosed in Recent Accounting Pronouncements
in this note.
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units
In 2011, the company began issuing performance-based restricted stock units (RSUs) to
certain company personnel. Performance-based RSUs vest subject to the achievement of certain
predetermined performance goals and employment over the requisite service period. The amount
of stock-based compensation expense recognized in any one period for such performance-based
RSUs is derived from the fair value of the RSU and can vary based on the achievement or
anticipated achievement of these goals. The fair value of each RSU is based on the closing
price of the companys common stock on the date of grant. If a performance goal is not met
or is not expected to be met, no compensation expense is recognized on the underlying RSUs,
and any previously recognized compensation expense on those RSUs is reversed in the period
that expectations change.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended
standards requiring comprehensive income to be presented as either a continuous statement of
comprehensive income or two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments do not
affect the disclosures required regarding comprehensive income. These amendments are to be
applied retrospectively for interim and fiscal year periods beginning after December 15, 2011.
The adoption of these standards will not impact the companys financial results or
disclosures but will have an impact on the presentation of comprehensive income when
adopted.
6
Table of Contents
In May 2011, the FASB issued amended standards related to fair value measurements and
disclosures that result in common fair value measurements and disclosures between GAAP and
International Financial Reporting Standards. The standards include amendments that clarify
the intent behind the application of existing fair value measurements and disclosures and
other amendments which change principles or requirements for fair value measurements or
disclosures. The requirements of these new standards are to be applied prospectively for
interim or annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of these standards
is not expected to have a material effect on the companys financial results or disclosures.
In October 2009, the FASB issued new revenue recognition standards for arrangements
with multiple deliverables. The new standards permit entities to use managements best
estimate of selling price to value individual deliverables when those deliverables do not
have vendor specific objective evidence of fair value or when third-party evidence of
selling price is not available. Additionally, these new standards modify the manner in which
the selling price is allocated across the separately identified deliverables by no longer
permitting the residual method of allocating the selling price. The requirements of these
new standards are to be applied prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or
materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption of
these standards on January 1, 2011 did not have a material impact on the companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
2. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Cash and cash equivalents consisted of the following (in thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash |
$ | 24,237 | $ | 12,687 | ||||
Cash equivalents: |
||||||||
Money market funds |
46,782 | 52,832 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 71,019 | $ | 65,519 | ||||
Cash equivalents are measured at fair value. Fair value is based on the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and
comparability in fair value measurements, the accounting guidance establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value
into three broad levels. These levels, in order of highest priority to lowest priority, are
described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the
measurement date for assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but
corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available.
The companys cash equivalents at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were all
classified within Level 1. There were no movements between fair value measurement levels of
the companys cash equivalents during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
The carrying amounts reported in the financial statements for accounts receivable and
accounts payable approximate their fair values because of the short-term maturities of these
financial instruments.
7
Table of Contents
3. NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net income per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of
outstanding shares of common stock during the period. Diluted net income per common share is
computed using the weighted-average number of outstanding shares of common stock and, when
dilutive, potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Potential shares
of common stock consist primarily of incremental shares issuable upon the assumed vesting
and exercise of stock-based awards using the treasury stock method.
A reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator used in the calculation of basic
and diluted net income per common share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Basic net income per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,557 | $ | 8,523 | $ | 25,528 | $ | 12,485 | ||||||||
Shares used in computation: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding |
45,596 | 42,764 | 45,484 | 42,612 | ||||||||||||
Basic net income per common share |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.29 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,557 | $ | 8,523 | $ | 25,528 | $ | 12,485 | ||||||||
Shares used in computation: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding |
45,596 | 42,764 | 45,484 | 42,612 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive stock-based awards |
4,297 | 5,251 | 4,598 | 5,142 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average number of
diluted common shares |
49,893 | 48,015 | 50,082 | 47,754 | ||||||||||||
Diluted net income per common share |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||||
The computation of diluted net income per common share for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 excluded 0.7 million shares as their impact was anti-dilutive. The
computation of diluted net income per common share for the three and six months ended June
30, 2010 excluded 0.4 million shares as their impact was anti-dilutive.
4. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,557 | $ | 8,523 | $ | 25,528 | $ | 12,485 | ||||||||
Changes in unrealized gain on available for sale securities, net |
| 18 | | 48 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(103 | ) | | 382 | | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 16,454 | $ | 8,541 | $ | 25,910 | $ | 12,533 | ||||||||
5. CREDIT FACILITY
On September 9, 2010, the company entered into a three-year $100.0 million principal
amount senior secured revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., as
administrative agent, and certain other financial institutions (the Credit Facility).
Borrowings under the Credit Facility may be used to finance the on-going working capital
needs of the company and its subsidiaries and for general corporate purposes, including
permitted business acquisitions, capital expenditures and authorized share repurchases. As
of June 30, 2011, no borrowings were outstanding under the Credit Facility. The Credit
Facility contains financial and other covenants, and the company was in compliance with all
of these covenants at June 30, 2011.
8
Table of Contents
6. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
On April 28, 2011, the companys board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to
$125.0 million in shares of the companys outstanding common stock. The shares may be
repurchased from time to time through April 30, 2012 in the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions. Any share repurchases are expected to be funded using cash on hand
and the companys existing credit facility. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the
company repurchased approximately 1.2 million shares in a private, non-underwritten
transaction with selling stockholders, comprised of the companys chief executive officer
and affiliates of Spectrum Equity V, L.P., for $50.0 million, and repurchased approximately
0.8 million shares in the open market for $28.1 million. These shares were recorded as
treasury stock at cost. At June 30, 2011, $46.9 million remained available for repurchases
of common stock under this authorization.
7. STOCK-BASED AWARD PLANS
The company grants stock options and other stock-based awards, including RSUs, to
employees, directors and consultants under the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2009 Plan).
The 2009 Plan is subject to an automatic annual increase provision on the first day of each
fiscal year. On January 1, 2011, the number of shares available for stock-based awards under
the 2009 Plan increased by 1.8 million shares. As of June 30, 2011, 3.8 million shares were
available for stock-based awards under the 2009 Plan.
Stock Options
Stock options granted generally vest over four years. A summary of stock option
activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is as follows (shares in thousands):
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Number of | Exercise | |||||||
Shares | Price | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
7,792 | $ | 6.07 | |||||
Granted |
315 | 38.96 | ||||||
Exercised |
(1,967 | ) | 5.09 | |||||
Canceled |
(119 | ) | 6.14 | |||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
6,021 | 8.10 | ||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2011 |
4,060 | 5.37 | ||||||
Vested and expected to vest |
5,856 | 8.11 | ||||||
As of June 30, 2011, the company had $9.4 million of total unrecognized
compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock options. The
unrecognized compensation expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
remaining period of 3.4 years. The weighted average remaining contractual life of stock
options outstanding at June 30, 2011 was 6.3 years. The total intrinsic values of stock
options outstanding and stock options exercisable as of June 30, 2011 were $200.4 million
and $146.2 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised
during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $65.0 million.
9
Table of Contents
The company estimates the fair value of each stock option on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average grant date fair values of stock
options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were $15.24 and $5.43,
respectively. The following weighted average assumptions were used in the calculations for
the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Expected volatility |
42.0 | % | 40 | % | ||||
Expected term (in years) |
5.0 | 4.0 | ||||||
Weighted average risk-free interest rate |
1.8 | % | 1.9 | % | ||||
Weighted average fair value of the underlying common stock |
$ | 38.96 | $ | 16.07 | ||||
Expected dividends |
| |
Restricted Stock Units
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the company also granted time-based and
performance-based RSUs representing the right to receive one share of the companys common
stock under the 2009 Plan. Time-based RSUs generally vest over three to four years.
Performance-based RSUs vest subject to the achievement of certain predetermined performance
goals and employment over the requisite service period. For the six months ended June 30,
2011, the number of shares of performance-based RSUs granted was de minimis.
The following table summarizes RSU activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011
(RSUs in thousands):
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Number of | Grant Date | |||||||
RSUs | Fair Value | |||||||
Restricted stock units outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
677 | $ | 20.75 | |||||
Granted |
483 | 37.05 | ||||||
Vested |
(41 | ) | 16.63 | |||||
Forfeited |
(33 | ) | 22.49 | |||||
Restricted stock units outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
1,086 | 28.10 | ||||||
As of June 30, 2011 the company had $23.4 million of total unrecognized
compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to RSUs. The unrecognized
compensation expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.7
years.
Summary of Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation expense was included in the following statements of income
captions (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Cost of subscription revenues |
$ | 85 | $ | 49 | $ | 147 | $ | 77 | ||||||||
Technology and development |
911 | 490 | 1,687 | 887 | ||||||||||||
Marketing and advertising |
383 | 118 | 708 | 186 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
822 | 605 | 1,384 | 1,116 | ||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
$ | 2,201 | $ | 1,262 | $ | 3,926 | $ | 2,266 | ||||||||
10
Table of Contents
8. INCOME TAXES
The company is subject to income taxes in U.S. and foreign jurisdictions and to
continual examination by tax authorities. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the
companys uncertain tax positions and determining its provision for income taxes. The
companys total gross unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
were $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively. The gross uncertain tax positions, if
recognized, would result in the reduction of tax expense.
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
From time to time, the company is a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings
or other legal matters that arise in the ordinary course of business or otherwise. While the
companys management does not believe that any pending legal claim or proceeding will be
resolved in a manner that would have a material adverse effect on the companys business,
the company cannot assure the ultimate outcome of any legal proceeding or contingency in
which the company is or may become involved.
11
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements relating to
future events and future performance. All statements other than those that are purely
historical may be forward-looking statements. We may, in some cases, use words such as
project, believe, anticipate, plan, expect, estimate, intend, should,
would, could, potentially, will or may, or other words that convey uncertainty of
future events or outcomes to identify these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements in this Quarterly Report include statements about:
| our future financial performance, including our revenues, cost of revenues, operating expenses and ability to sustain profitability; |
| our rate of revenue and expense growth; |
| the pool of our potential subscribers; |
| our ability to attract and retain subscribers and their choices of subscription package; |
| our ability to manage growth, including adding employees and facilities; |
| our ability to generate additional revenues on a cost-effective basis; |
| our ability to acquire content and make it available online; |
| our ability to enhance the subscribers experience with added tools and features and provide value; |
| our success with respect to any future or recent acquisitions; |
| our international expansion plans; |
| our ability to adequately manage costs and control margins and trends; |
| our investments in content and technology and the success of our promotional programs and new products; |
| our development of brand awareness; |
| our competitive position; |
| our liquidity and working capital requirements and the availability of cash and credit; |
| our plans to repurchase shares of our common stock; |
| fluctuations in our business, including the impact of the television show Who Do You Think You Are?; |
| the impact of external market forces; |
| the impact of claims or litigation; and |
| the impact of potential legislation and regulatory changes on privacy, subscription renewal or other aspects of our business. |
Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, level of activity, performance or achievements. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated by these forward-looking statements. These important factors include those that we discuss in this Quarterly Report under the captions Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Risk Factors and elsewhere. You should read these factors and the other cautionary statements made in this Quarterly Report as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this Quarterly Report. If one or more of these factors materialize, or if any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results, performance or achievements may vary materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. All subsequent written or spoken forward-looking statements attributable to our company or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report are made only as of the date of this Quarterly Report, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. |
12
Table of Contents
Overview
Ancestry.com is the worlds largest online family history resource, with nearly 1.7
million paying subscribers around the world as of June 30, 2011. We offer access on a
subscription basis to an extensive collection of billions of historical records that we have
digitized, indexed and made available online over the past 14 years. Our subscribers use our
proprietary online platform, extensive digital historical record collection and easy-to-use
technology to research their family histories, build their family trees, collaborate with
other subscribers, upload their own records and publish and share their stories with their
families. These subscribers are our primary source of revenues. We believe we provide
ongoing value to our subscribers by regularly adding new historical content, enhancing our
Web sites with new tools and features and enabling greater collaboration among our users
through the growth of our global community. Our goal is to remain the leading online
resource for family history and to grow our subscriber base by offering a superior value
proposition to anyone interested in learning more about their family history.
The following discussion and analysis is based on and should be read in conjunction
with the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report, as well as the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the 2010 Annual Report).
Recent Developments
Share Repurchase Program
On April 28, 2011, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $125.0
million in shares of our outstanding common stock. The shares may be repurchased from time
to time through April 30, 2012 in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.
Any share repurchases are expected to be funded using cash on hand and our existing credit
facility. During the six months ended June 30 2011, we repurchased approximately 1.2 million
shares in a private, non-underwritten transaction with selling stockholders, comprised of
our chief executive officer and affiliates of Spectrum Equity V, L.P., for $50.0 million,
and we repurchased approximately 0.8 million shares in the open market for $28.1 million.
These shares were recorded as treasury stock at cost. At June 30, 2011, $46.9 million
remained available for repurchases of common stock under this authorization.
Key Business Metrics
Our management regularly reviews a number of financial and operating metrics, including
the following key business metrics to evaluate our business, determine the allocation of
resources, make decisions regarding corporate strategies and evaluate forward-looking
projections. The following key business metrics reflect data with respect to the
Ancestry.com Web sites and exclude our other subscription-based Web sites, such as
Footnote.com, Genline.se, myfamily.com and Genealogy.com.
| Total subscribers. A subscriber is an individual who pays for renewable access or redeems a gift subscription to one of our Ancestry.com Web sites. Total subscribers is defined as the number of subscribers at the end of the quarter. |
| Gross subscriber additions. A gross subscriber addition is a new customer who purchases a subscription or redeems a gift subscription to one of our Ancestry.com Web sites, net of subscriber returns. |
| Monthly churn. Monthly churn is a measure representing the number of subscribers that cancel in the quarter divided by the sum of beginning subscribers and gross subscriber additions during the quarter. To arrive at monthly churn, we divide the result by three. Management uses this measure to determine the health of our subscriber base. |
| Subscriber acquisition cost. Subscriber acquisition cost is external marketing and advertising expense, divided by gross subscriber additions in the quarter. Management uses this metric to determine the efficiency of our marketing and advertising programs in acquiring new subscribers. |
| Average monthly revenue per subscriber. Average monthly revenue per subscriber is total subscription revenues earned in the quarter from subscriptions to one of the Ancestry.com Web sites divided by the average number of subscribers in the quarter, divided by three. The average number of subscribers for the quarter is calculated by taking the average of the beginning and ending number of subscribers for the quarter. |
13
Table of Contents
Our key business metrics are presented for the three months ended June 30, 2011, March
31, 2011 and June 30, 2010:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | March 31, | June 30, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||
Total subscribers at end of quarter |
1,672,319 | 1,615,169 | 1,310,562 | |||||||||
Gross subscriber additions |
321,687 | 424,531 | 290,589 | |||||||||
Monthly churn |
4.6 | % | 3.7 | % | 4.3 | % | ||||||
Subscriber acquisition cost |
$ | 81.23 | $ | 69.56 | $ | 74.04 | ||||||
Average monthly revenue per subscriber |
$ | 18.88 | $ | 18.05 | $ | 18.02 |
Components of Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
Revenues
Subscription revenues. We derive subscription revenues primarily from providing access
to our services via our various Ancestry.com Web sites. Subscription revenues are recognized
ratably over the subscription period and consist primarily of annual and monthly
subscriptions, net of estimated cancellations. We typically charge our subscribers credit
cards for their subscriptions at the commencement of the subscription period and at each
renewal date (whether annual, monthly or other), unless they cancel their subscription
before the renewal date. The amount of unrecognized revenues is recorded in deferred
revenues. Subscription revenues also include revenues related to subscriptions to our
non-Ancestry.com Web sites.
A majority of our subscription revenues is derived from subscribers in the United
States. We attribute subscription revenues by country based on the billing address of the
subscriber, regardless of the Web site to which the person subscribes. The following
presents subscription revenues by geographic region:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 73,296 | $ | 54,110 | $ | 136,970 | $ | 98,514 | ||||||||
United Kingdom |
11,722 | 9,965 | 22,918 | 19,682 | ||||||||||||
All other countries |
11,689 | 6,469 | 22,002 | 11,908 | ||||||||||||
Total subscription revenues |
$ | 96,707 | $ | 70,544 | $ | 181,890 | $ | 130,104 | ||||||||
Product and other revenues. Product and other revenues include sales of desktop
software (Family Tree Maker), physical delivery of copies of historical vital records
(birth, marriage and death certificates), DNA testing (Ancestry.com DNA), advertising,
digitization services, genealogical research services and other products and services.
Revenues related to these products are recognized upon shipment of product or fulfillment of
services, as applicable.
Expenses
Personnel-related costs for each category of cost of revenues and operating expenses
include salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation, employer payroll taxes and employee
benefit costs.
Costs of Revenues
Cost of subscription revenues. Cost of subscription revenues consists of Web server
operating costs, including depreciation and software licensing on Web servers and related
equipment and Web hosting costs, personnel-related costs for Web hosting and subscriber
services personnel, amortization of our content database costs, credit card processing fees
and royalty costs on certain content licensed from others.
Cost of product and other revenues. Cost of product and other revenues consists of our
direct costs to purchase products, shipping costs, personnel-related costs of digitization
services and genealogical research personnel and credit card processing fees.
14
Table of Contents
Operating Expenses
Technology and development. Technology and development expenses consist of
personnel-related costs incurred in product development, maintenance and testing of our Web
sites, enhancing our record search and linking technologies, developing solutions for new
product lines, internal information systems and infrastructure, third-party development and
other internal-use software systems. Our development costs are primarily based in the United
States and are primarily devoted to providing accessibility to content and tools for
individuals to do family history research. We have hired and plan to hire a significant
number of technology and development employees during 2011. In many
cases, we have been filling open positions with individuals with more
specialized experience than in the past, and we have found that competition for qualified
technology and development personnel has increased during the six months ended June 30, 2011
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. Due to these factors, we have experienced
increases in technology and development personnel-related expenses, and we expect these
expenses to continue to increase for the remainder of 2011.
Marketing and advertising. Marketing and advertising expenses consist primarily of
direct expenses related to television and online advertising and personnel-related expenses.
Marketing and advertising costs are principally incurred in the United States, United
Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Media rates increased in the six months ended June 30, 2011
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010, and we expect to continue to see increases
in these rates. NBC has announced that they have renewed a third season of the television
show Who Do You Think You Are?, and we have signed an agreement to continue our
involvement in the show, including production research. We currently expect the third season
of the show will begin to air in the first quarter of 2012. Nevertheless, we can provide no
assurance that NBC will air a third season of the show. NBC began re-airing episodes of the
second season in July 2011. We do not expect the repeated episodes will have a significant
impact on our quarterly or full year results of operations.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses consist principally of
personnel-related expenses for our executive, finance, legal, human resources and other
administrative personnel, as well as outside services costs, consisting primarily of
consultant, legal and accounting fees, and other general corporate expenses. Due to our
continued business growth, we have hired additional personnel to support the expansion. As a
result, we expect general and administrative personnel-related expenses to continue to
increase for the remainder of 2011.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets. Amortization of acquired intangible assets
is the amortization expense associated with subscriber relationships and contracts, core
technologies and intangible assets, including trademarks and tradenames, resulting from
business acquisitions.
Interest and Other Expense, Net and Income Tax Expense
Interest and other expense, net. Interest and other expense, net includes interest
expense associated with the amortization of deferred financing costs related to our credit
facility and other financing liabilities and, in 2010, the interest expense associated with
our long-term debt. Also included are interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents,
any short-term investments, and other income and expenses, including foreign currency
exchange gains and losses.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense consists of federal and state income taxes in
the United States and income taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions.
15
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our condensed consolidated statements of income as a
percentage of revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The
information contained in the table below should be read in conjunction with our condensed
consolidated financial statements and the related notes.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Subscription revenues |
95.5 | % | 94.7 | % | 94.6 | % | 93.7 | % | ||||||||
Product and other revenues |
4.5 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||
Costs of revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of subscription revenues |
13.9 | 15.1 | 14.6 | 16.4 | ||||||||||||
Cost of product and other revenues |
1.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
Total cost of revenues |
15.7 | 16.8 | 16.5 | 18.4 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
84.3 | 83.2 | 83.5 | 81.6 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Technology and development |
14.1 | 13.4 | 14.5 | 14.3 | ||||||||||||
Marketing and advertising |
29.9 | 32.9 | 33.3 | 33.8 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
10.0 | 10.8 | 10.1 | 11.4 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
4.2 | 4.9 | 4.5 | 5.3 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
58.2 | 62.0 | 62.4 | 64.8 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
26.1 | 21.2 | 21.1 | 16.8 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other expense, net |
(0.4 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (1.8 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income taxes |
25.7 | 19.2 | 20.9 | 15.0 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(9.4 | ) | (7.8 | ) | (7.6 | ) | (6.0 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
16.3 | 11.4 | 13.3 | 9.0 | ||||||||||||
16
Table of Contents
Revenues, Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | % Change | 2011 | 2010 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subscription revenues |
$ | 96,707 | $ | 70,544 | 37.1 | % | $ | 181,890 | $ | 130,104 | 39.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Product and other revenues |
4,601 | 3,916 | 17.5 | 10,446 | 8,777 | 19.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
101,308 | 74,460 | 36.1 | 192,336 | 138,881 | 38.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of subscription
revenues |
14,111 | 11,228 | 25.7 | 27,998 | 22,729 | 23.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of product and other
revenues |
1,841 | 1,280 | 43.8 | 3,669 | 2,774 | 32.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total cost of revenues |
15,952 | 12,508 | 27.5 | 31,667 | 25,503 | 24.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 85,356 | $ | 61,952 | 37.8 | $ | 160,669 | $ | 113,378 | 41.7 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit percentage |
84.3 | % | 83.2 | % | 83.5 | % | 81.6 | % |
Subscription revenues
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our subscription revenues increased $26.2
million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily the
result of an increase in the number of total subscribers, as well as an increase in average
monthly revenue per subscriber on our Ancestry.com Web sites. Net subscriber additions
increased due in part to continued marketing efforts, including the airing of NBCs
television show Who Do You Think You Are?, offset by the impact of monthly churn. Average
monthly revenue per subscriber increased in the three months ended June 30, 2011 primarily
due to both increases in the percentage of overall subscribers that are monthly subscribers
and the percentage of overall subscribers packages that are premium packages, both of which
provide greater monthly revenues than other subscriptions. The percentage of overall
subscribers that are monthly subscribers increased to 33% at June 30, 2011 from 30% at June
30, 2010. The percentage of overall subscribers packages that are premium packages
increased to 46% at June 30, 2011 from 43% at June 30, 2010.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our subscription revenues increased $51.8
million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was driven by the same
factors that influenced the three-month results.
Product and other revenues
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our product and other revenues increased $0.7
million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to
$0.5 million of digitization services revenue from iArchives, which we acquired in the
fourth quarter of 2010, and a $0.3 million increase in revenues related to our Family Tree
Maker desktop software.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our product and other revenues increased
$1.7 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due
to $1.3 million of digitization services revenue from iArchives, which we acquired in the
fourth quarter of 2010.
Cost of subscription revenues
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our cost of subscription revenues increased
$2.9 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily
due to an increase of $0.8 million in Web server operating costs partly attributable to
greater user traffic volumes, an increase of $0.7 million in our credit card processing fees
reflecting higher transaction volumes as a result of growth in total subscribers, an
increase of $0.6 million in our personnel-related costs reflecting additional Web hosting
support personnel and an increase of $0.4 million in content database amortization due to
continued investment in content database costs.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our cost of subscription revenues increased
$5.3 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due
to an increase of $1.6 million in our credit card processing fees reflecting higher
transaction volumes as a result of growth in total subscribers, an increase of $1.5 million
in Web server operating costs partly attributable to greater user traffic volumes, an
increase of $1.0 million in our personnel-related costs reflecting additional Web hosting
support personnel and an increase of $0.8 million in content database amortization due to
continued investment in content database costs.
17
Table of Contents
Cost of product and other revenues
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our cost of product and other revenues
increased $0.6 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. For the six months
ended June 30, 2011, our cost of product and other revenues increased $0.9 million compared
to the six months ended June 30, 2010. These increases were primarily due to the costs
associated with iArchives digitization services and ProGenealogists genealogical research,
both of which businesses were acquired in the second half of 2010.
Operating Expenses
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | % Change | 2011 | 2010 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technology and development |
$ | 14,242 | $ | 9,992 | 42.5 | % | $ | 27,910 | $ | 19,919 | 40.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Marketing and advertising |
30,250 | 24,490 | 23.5 | 64,058 | 46,936 | 36.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
10,111 | 8,032 | 25.9 | 19,468 | 15,774 | 23.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired
intangible assets |
4,297 | 3,679 | 16.8 | 8,567 | 7,358 | 16.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 58,900 | $ | 46,193 | 27.5 | $ | 120,003 | $ | 89,987 | 33.4 | ||||||||||||||
Technology and development
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our technology and development expenses
increased $4.3 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was
primarily the result of an increase in personnel-related expenses of $3.1 million primarily
resulting from a 20% increase in the average number of technology and development personnel
during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended June 30,
2010. In many cases, we have been filling open positions with individuals with more
specialized experience than in the past, and have found that competition for
qualified technology and development personnel has increased during
the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2010. In addition, costs of third-party service providers increased $0.8 million
primarily due to incremental outsourced product quality assurance services and research and
development costs for new products and features.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our technology and development expenses
increased $8.0 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was
primarily the result of an increase in personnel-related expenses of $6.2 million resulting
from a 21% increase in the average number of technology and development personnel during the
six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2010. In many cases, we have been filling open positions with individuals with more
experience than in the past, and have found that competition for
qualified technology and development personnel has increased during
the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2010. Further, costs of third-party service providers
increased $1.1 million primarily due to incremental outsourced
product quality assurance services and research and development costs
for new products and features. In addition,
depreciation expense related to technology and development increased $0.3 million.
Marketing and advertising
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our marketing and advertising expenses
increased $5.8 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was
primarily due to an increase of $5.5 million in television ad campaigns primarily resulting
from our expanded marketing efforts in both domestic and international markets and increased
advertising and product integration costs incurred in connection with the second season of
Who Do You Think You Are?, which reflected higher rates compared to the first season of
the show. In addition, paid search increased $1.0 million and personnel-related costs increased $1.0 million primarily due to a 17%
increase in the average number of marketing and advertising personnel during the three
months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. These increases
were partially offset by reductions of $1.7 million in online display advertising and affiliate expenses.
18
Table of Contents
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our marketing and advertising expenses
increased $17.1 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was
primarily due to an increase of $13.5 million in television ad
campaigns, an increase of $3.6 million in paid search, an increase of
$1.7 million in sponsorship expense and an increase of $0.7 million in print
advertising. These increases primarily resulted from our expanded marketing efforts in both
domestic and international markets and increased advertising and product integration costs
incurred in connection with the second season of Who Do You Think You Are?, which
reflected higher rates compared to the first season of the show. In addition,
personnel-related costs increased $2.2 million primarily due to a 16% increase in the
average number of marketing and advertising personnel during the six months ended June 30,
2011 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. These increases were partially offset
by reductions of $4.7 million in online display advertising and affiliate expenses.
General and administrative
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our general and administrative expenses
increased $2.1 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was
primarily the result of an increase of $1.4 million in personnel-related costs resulting
from a 15% increase in the average number of general and administrative personnel during the
three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared the three months ended June 30, 2010. In
addition, we incurred $0.4 million in costs related to the registration of securities in an
underwritten secondary offering of our common stock on behalf of certain existing
stockholders.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our general and administrative expenses
increased $3.7 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was
primarily the result of an increase of $1.8 million in personnel-related costs resulting
from a 14% increase in the average number of general and administrative personnel during the
six months June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. In addition,
certain administrative expenses increased $1.5 million and we incurred $0.4 million in costs
related to the registration of securities in the underwritten secondary offering of our
common stock on behalf of certain existing stockholders.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our amortization of acquired intangible
assets increased $0.6 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. For the six
months ended June 30, 2011, our amortization of acquired intangible assets increased $1.2
million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. These increases were primarily due
to the amortization of intangible assets acquired as part of business acquisitions in the
second half of 2010. Certain intangible assets are amortized on an accelerated basis
resulting in higher amortization expense earlier in the intangible assets useful lives.
Interest and Other Expense, Net and Income Tax Expense
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | % Change | 2011 | 2010 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other expense, net |
$ | (429 | ) | $ | (1,429 | ) | (70.0 | )% | $ | (536 | ) | $ | (2,573 | ) | (79.2 | )% | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
(9,470 | ) | (5,807 | ) | 63.1 | (14,602 | ) | (8,333 | ) | 75.2 | ||||||||||||||
Other data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective tax rate |
36.4 | % | 40.5 | % | 36.4 | % | 40.0 | % |
Interest and other expense, net
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our interest and other expense, net decreased
$1.0 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. For the six months ended June
30, 2011, our interest and other expense, net decreased $2.0 million compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2010. These decreases were primarily due to a decrease in interest
expense reflecting our having no long-term debt outstanding at June 30, 2011.
Income tax expense
Our effective income tax rate decreased by 4.1 percentage points for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. Our effective income
tax rate decreased by 3.6 percentage points for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared
to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decreases were primarily due to our recognizing
research and development tax credits and tax benefits resulting from stock-based
compensation expense related to disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011. In addition, state effective income tax rates
decreased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to changes in the state tax apportionment factors
resulting from recently legislated changes.
19
Table of Contents
Other Financial Data
In addition to our results discussed above determined under accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), we believe adjusted EBITDA and
free cash flow are useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because
securities analysts use adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow as supplemental measures to
evaluate the overall operating performance of companies. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, our net income, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow were as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | % Change | 2011 | 2010 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,557 | $ | 8,523 | 94.3 | % | $ | 25,528 | $ | 12,485 | 104.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
38,421 | 25,270 | 52.0 | 64,026 | 42,283 | 51.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Free cash flow(2) |
27,131 | 14,446 | 87.8 | 45,874 | 25,856 | 77.4 |
(1) | Adjusted EBITDA. We define adjusted EBITDA as net income plus net interest and other (income) expense, net; income tax expense; and non-cash charges including depreciation, amortization, impairment of intangible assets and stock-based compensation expense. | |
(2) | Free cash flow. We define free cash flow as net income plus net interest and other (income) expense, net; income tax expense; and non-cash charges including depreciation, amortization, impairment of intangible assets and stock-based compensation expense; and minus capitalization of content database costs, purchases of property and equipment and cash paid for income taxes and interest. |
Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are financial data that are not calculated in
accordance with GAAP. The table below provides a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial
measures to net income, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and
presented in accordance with GAAP. We prepare adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow to
eliminate the impact of items that we do not consider indicative of our core operating
performance. We encourage you to evaluate these adjustments and the reasons we consider them
appropriate, as well as the material limitations of non-GAAP measures.
Our management uses adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow as measures of operating
performance; for planning purposes, including the preparation of our annual operating
budget; to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of our business; to
evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies; and in communications with our board
of directors concerning our financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA together with revenues
has also been used as a financial performance objective in determining the bonus pool under
our recent performance incentive programs. Management believes that the use of adjusted
EBITDA and free cash flow provides consistency and comparability with our past financial
performance, facilitates period to period comparisons of operations, and also facilitates
comparisons with other peer companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial measures
to supplement their GAAP results. Management believes that it is useful to exclude non-cash
charges such as depreciation, amortization, impairment of intangible assets and stock-based
compensation expense from adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow because (i) the amount of such
non-cash expenses in any specific period may not directly correlate to the underlying
performance of our business operations and (ii) such expenses can vary significantly between
periods as a result of new acquisitions, full amortization of previously acquired tangible
and intangible assets or the timing of new stock-based awards.
Although adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are frequently used by investors and
securities analysts in their evaluations of companies, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow
each have limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider them in isolation
or as a substitute for analysis of our results of operations as reported under GAAP.
Some of these limitations are:
| adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow do not reflect our future requirements for contractual commitments and adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements for content database costs, property and equipment; |
| adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital; |
| adjusted EBITDA does not reflect interest income or interest expense; |
| adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash requirements for income taxes; |
| adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow do not reflect the non-cash component of employee compensation; |
| although depreciation, amortization and impairment of intangible assets and acquired in-process research and development are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated or amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for these replacements; and |
| other companies in our industry may calculate adjusted EBITDA or free cash flow or similarly titled measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures. |
20
Table of Contents
The following table presents a reconciliation of our adjusted EBITDA and free cash
flow to net income, the most comparable GAAP measure, for the periods presented.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA and free cash
flow to net income: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,557 | $ | 8,523 | $ | 25,528 | $ | 12,485 | ||||||||
Interest and other expense, net |
429 | 1,429 | 536 | 2,573 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
9,470 | 5,807 | 14,602 | 8,333 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation |
3,188 | 2,740 | 6,452 | 5,604 | ||||||||||||
Amortization |
6,576 | 5,509 | 12,982 | 11,022 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
2,201 | 1,262 | 3,926 | 2,266 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 38,421 | $ | 25,270 | $ | 64,026 | $ | 42,283 | ||||||||
Capitalization of content database costs |
(4,204 | ) | (2,349 | ) | (9,951 | ) | (5,141 | ) | ||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(3,693 | ) | (2,221 | ) | (4,418 | ) | (3,628 | ) | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
(111 | ) | (476 | ) | (226 | ) | (1,477 | ) | ||||||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
(3,282 | ) | (5,778 | ) | (3,557 | ) | (6,181 | ) | ||||||||
Free cash flow |
$ | 27,131 | $ | 14,446 | $ | 45,874 | $ | 25,856 | ||||||||
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2011, we had $171.0 million of total liquidity, comprised of $71.0
million in cash and cash equivalents and the ability to borrow $100.0 million under a
three-year $100 million principal amount senior secured revolving credit facility with Bank
of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and certain other financial institutions. Cash
and cash equivalents are comprised of high quality investments including money market funds.
Note 2 of the accompanying Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this
Quarterly Report describes further the composition of our cash and cash equivalents. Note 6
to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2010 Annual Report describes
further the terms of our revolving credit facility. Our primary source of cash in the
periods presented in this Quarterly Report (described in further detail below) was net cash
provided by operating activities.
Our primary uses of cash include operating costs such as personnel-related expenses,
marketing and advertising, capital expenditures related to content databases, property and
equipment and Web hosting costs. We also use cash for other purposes including repurchases
of shares of our common stock, business acquisitions and expansion of new markets and
businesses. During 2010, we used cash to repay our prior credit facility. Our future capital
requirements may vary significantly from those now planned and will depend on many factors,
including:
| the levels of advertising and promotion required to retain and acquire subscribers; |
| the development of new services; |
| market acceptance of our services; |
| the launch of additional services and improvement of our competitive position in the marketplace; |
| the level of new content acquisition required to retain and acquire subscribers; |
| the expansion of our development and marketing organizations; |
| our engaging in future business acquisitions; |
21
Table of Contents
| amounts we must spend to integrate and operate acquired businesses; |
| future stock repurchases by us (including under our current $125.0 million stock repurchase authorization, of which $46.9 million remains available for repurchases); |
| the building of infrastructure necessary to support our growth; and |
| our relationships with subscribers and vendors. |
We have experienced increases in our expenditures in connection with the growth in our
operations and personnel, and we anticipate that our expenditures will continue to increase
in the future. We have also increased our investments in content databases and property and
equipment in the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010, and we expect to
continue to increase our investments in these categories in the remainder of 2011 compared
to 2010. We expect cash on hand, cash provided by operating activities and available credit
from our credit facility will provide adequate funds for operating and recurring cash needs
( e.g., working capital and capital expenditures) for at least the next 12 months.
Summary cash flow information for cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 is set forth below. For the
purpose of this cash flow analysis, we have included highly liquid short-term investments,
which we consider readily convertible to cash on a short-term basis. We consider cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments in evaluating our overall cash position.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | % Change | 2011 | 2010 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash and cash
equivalents and
short-term investments
provided by (used in): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 31,584 | $ | 23,032 | 37 | % | $ | 67,985 | $ | 57,554 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||
Investing activities |
(7,897 | ) | (4,552 | ) | 73 | (14,369 | ) | (8,721 | ) | 65 | ||||||||||||||
Financing activities |
(54,927 | ) | (12,509 | ) | 339 | (48,139 | ) | (15,153 | ) | 218 | ||||||||||||||
Effect of changes
in foreign currency
exchange rates on
cash and cash
equivalents and
short-term
investments |
(4 | ) | | N/M | 23 | | N/M | |||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in
cash and cash
equivalents and
short-term investments |
$ | (31,244 | ) | $ | 5,971 | (623 | ) | $ | 5,500 | $ | 33,680 | (84 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash Flow Analysis
Net cash provided by operating activities
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, net cash provided by operating activities was
$31.6 million, an increase of $8.6 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Net cash provided by operating activities consists of net income as adjusted for non-cash
expenses and changes in operating assets and liabilities. Net income was $16.6 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $8.0 million over the three months
ended June 30, 2010. Our non-cash expenses, including depreciation, amortization of content
database costs, amortization of acquired intangible assets, amortization of deferred
financing costs, deferred income taxes and stock-based compensation expense totaled $10.0
million, an increase of $1.4 million over the three months ended June 30, 2010. Our net cash
provided as a result of changes in accounts payable and other liabilities and excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation totaled $8.2 million, an increase of $7.5 million over the three
months ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to the increase in employee payroll taxes that we
withheld as a result of the net share settlement of stock-based awards and increased
payables resulting from the increase in operating expenses in the three months ended June
30, 2011. Net cash used as a result of changes in income tax receivable increased $8.7 million primarily
due to stock-based award benefits in the three months ended June 30, 2011, partially offset
by income tax expense. The change in our deferred revenues, which represents cash received
from subscribers but not yet recognized in revenues, totaled $5.1 million, an increase of
$0.4 million over the three months ended June 30, 2010.
22
Table of Contents
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, net cash provided by operating activities was
$68.0 million, an increase of $10.4 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Net income was $25.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $13.0
million over the six months ended June 30, 2010. Our non-cash expenses, including
depreciation, amortization of content database costs, amortization of acquired intangible
assets, amortization of deferred financing costs, deferred income taxes and stock-based
compensation expense totaled $20.5 million, an increase of $3.4 million over the six months
ended June 30, 2010. Our net cash provided as a result of changes in accounts payable and other
liabilities and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation totaled $2.7 million, a
decrease of $1.9 million from the six months ended June 30,
2010. Net cash used as a result of changes
in income tax receivable increased $8.8 million primarily due to stock-based award benefits
in the six months ended June 30, 2011, partially offset by income tax expense. Our net cash
provided by the changes in other operating assets totaled $1.6 million, a decrease of $1.1
million from cash provided by changes in these assets of $2.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010. The change in our deferred revenues, which represents cash received
from subscribers but not yet recognized in revenues, totaled $24.9 million, an increase of
$5.8 million over the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase primarily reflects
subscriber growth and subscription package mix during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Subscriber growth increased deferred revenues due to the impact of overall subscription
volume on revenues. The increase in the percentage of overall subscription packages that are
premium packages also drove the increase as premium packages provide more revenue per
subscription. The effect of these increases was partially offset by the increase in the
percentage of overall subscribers that are monthly subscriptions, as monthly subscriptions
provide less deferred revenues than annual subscriptions.
Net cash used in investing activities
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, net cash used in investing activities totaled
$7.9 million, an increase of $3.3 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Net cash used in investing activities consisted of investments in content databases and
property and equipment for both three month periods. For the three months ended June 30,
2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 investments in content databases and
property and equipment increased $1.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, net cash used in investing activities totaled
$14.4 million, an increase of $5.6 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Net cash used in investing activities consisted of investments in content databases and
property and equipment for both six month periods. For the six months ended June 30, 2011
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010 investments in content databases and property
and equipment increased $4.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively. We increased our
investment in content databases primarily through increased content acquisitions of our core
content (i.e., census and vital records) in the first half of 2011 and second half of 2010.
Net cash used in financing activities
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, net cash used in financing activities totaled
$54.9 million, an increase of $42.4 million compared to $12.5 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2010. Net cash used in financing activities consisted primarily of
repurchases of shares of our common stock of $78.1 million, which was partially offset by an
increase in proceeds from stock option exercises of $2.4 million and an increase in excess
tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $12.8 million. In the three months ended June
30, 2010, net cash used in financing activities included $20.9 million of principal payments
on long-term debt, which we did not have outstanding at June 30, 2011.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, net cash used in financing activities totaled
$48.1 million, an increase of $33.0 million compared to $15.2 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2010. Net cash used in financing activities consisted primarily of
repurchases of shares of our common stock of $78.1 million, which was partially offset by an
increase in proceeds from stock option exercises of $5.0 million and an increase in excess
tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $16.9 million. In the six months ended June
30, 2010, net cash used in financing activities included $23.8 million of principal payments
on long-term debt, which we did not have outstanding at June 30, 2011.
23
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
In June 2011, we entered into a lease to relocate our San Francisco, California office
to a new office space beginning in 2012. The new space is significantly larger than our
current office space in San Francisco and has rent payments totaling $15.6 million through
2019. The new lease will be accounted for as an operating lease and we will recognize rent
expense on a straight line basis beginning with our occupation of the space, expected to
begin in May 2012. This new lease will increase total minimum annual rental payments as
disclosed in the December 31, 2010 Annual Report by the following amounts:
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | 1-3 | 4-5 | After | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 Year | Years | Years | 5 Years | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
$ | 15,597 | $ | | $ | 2,839 | $ | 4,250 | $ | 8,508 | ||||||||||
There have been no other significant changes to our contractual obligations since
December 31, 2010. While we also expect to enter into a short-term lease in order to
accommodate our current office space requirements in San Francisco until our new San
Francisco office discussed above is available for occupancy, we do not believe that this
will have a significant impact on our contractual obligations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As part of our ongoing business, we do not engage in transactions that generate
relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities. Accordingly, our operating
results, financial condition and cash flows are not subject to off-balance sheet risks.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with GAAP.
The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues,
costs, expenses and related disclosures. These estimates and assumptions are often based on
historical experience and judgments that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances
at the time made. However, all such estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and
unpredictable and actual results may differ. It is possible that other professionals,
applying their own judgment to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and support
alternative estimates and assumptions that would result in material changes to our operating
results and financial condition. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing
basis. We consider the assumptions and estimates associated with recoverability of
indefinite-lived and long-lived assets, the period of amortization of our content database
costs, stock-based compensation and income taxes to be our critical accounting estimates.
For further information on our significant accounting policies, see Note 1 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2010 Annual Report. There have been no
changes to our significant accounting policies since December 31, 2010 except as discussed
in Note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements of this Quarterly Report.
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units
During 2011, we began issuing performance-based restricted stock units (RSUs) to
certain company personnel. Performance-based RSUs vest subject to the achievement of certain
predetermined performance goals and employment over the requisite service period. The amount
of stock-based compensation expense recognized in any one period for such performance-based
RSUs is derived from the fair value of the RSUs and can vary based on the achievement or
anticipated achievement of these goals. The fair value of each RSU is based on the closing
price of the companys common stock on the date of grant. If a performance goal is not met
or is not expected to be met, we recognize no compensation expense on the underlying RSUs,
and any previously recognized compensation expense on those RSUs is reversed in the period
that our expectations change. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the number of
performance-based RSUs granted was de minimis.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business which currently
are comprised primarily of foreign currency exchange rate risks. For financial market risks
related to foreign currency exchange rates, refer to Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk contained in Part II of our 2010 Annual Report. Our exposure
to market risk has not changed significantly since December 31, 2010.
24
Table of Contents
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by
us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that the
information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does
not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent or detect all error and
all fraud. While our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable
assurance of their effectiveness, because of the inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
In August 2009, we received a letter from counsel to Shutterfly, Inc., alleging
infringement of certain of its patents by our operation of our MyCanvas.com Web site. If
litigation were to commence, we believe that we have substantive and meritorious defenses to
these claims and would contest any claim vigorously.
In addition, we are party to other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business and may become subject to additional proceedings in the future. While management
does not believe that any pending legal claim or proceeding will be resolved in a manner
that would have a material adverse effect on our business, we cannot assure you of the
ultimate outcome of any legal proceeding or contingency in which we are or may become
involved.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
A wide range of factors could materially affect our performance. The following
factors and other information included in this Quarterly Report should be carefully
considered. Although the risk factors described below are the ones management deems
significant, additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we
presently deem less significant may also impair our business operations. If any of the
following events actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Business
If our efforts to retain and attract subscribers are not successful, our revenues will be
adversely affected.
We generate substantially all of our revenues from subscriptions to our services. We
must continue to retain existing and attract new subscribers. If our efforts to satisfy our
existing subscribers are not successful, we may not be able to retain them, and as a result,
our revenues would be adversely affected. For example, if consumers do not perceive our
services to be reliable, valuable and of high quality, if we fail to regularly introduce new
and improved services, or if we introduce new services that are not favorably received by
the market, we may not be able to retain existing or attract new subscribers. We rely on our
marketing and advertising efforts to attract new subscribers. If we are unable to
effectively retain existing subscribers and attract new subscribers, our business, financial
condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
The relative service levels, pricing and related features of competitors to our
products and services are some of the factors that may adversely impact our ability to
retain existing subscribers and attract new subscribers. Some of our current competitors
provide genealogical records free of charge. Some governments or private organizations may
make historical records available online at no cost to consumers and some commercial
entities could choose to make such records available on an advertising-supported basis
rather than a subscription basis. If consumers are able to satisfy their family history
research needs at no or lower cost, they may not perceive value in our products and
services. If our efforts to satisfy and retain our existing subscribers are not successful,
we may not be able to continue to attract new subscribers through word-of-mouth referrals.
Further, subscriber growth may decrease as a result of a decline in interest in family
history research. Any of these factors could cause our subscriber growth rate to fall, which
would adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
25
Table of Contents
Our recent performance may not be sustainable, which could negatively affect our stock
price or financial condition and results of operations.
Our revenues have grown rapidly, increasing from $150.6 million in 2006 to $300.9
million in 2010, representing a compound annual growth rate of 18.9%. In the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011, our revenues grew 36% and 38% over the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010. We may not be able to sustain our recent growth rate in future periods
and you should not rely on the revenue growth of these periods or any prior period or year
as an indication of our future performance. Additionally, we expect to continue to devote
substantial resources and funds to improving our technologies and product offerings and
acquiring new and relevant content, and also to expanding awareness of our brand and
category through marketing, which may reduce our margins in the near term. If our margins or
our future growth resulting from our implementation of these strategies fail to meet
investor or analyst expectations, it could have a negative effect on our stock price. If our
growth rate were to decline significantly or become negative, it could adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
If we experience excessive rates of subscriber cancellation, or churn, our revenues and
business may be harmed.
We must continually add new subscribers both to replace subscribers who choose to
cancel their subscriptions and to grow our business beyond our current subscriber base.
Subscribers choose to cancel their subscriptions for many reasons, including a desire to
reduce discretionary spending, a perception that they do not have sufficient time to use the
service or otherwise do not use the service sufficiently, the service is a poor value,
competitive services provide a better value or experience or subscriber service issues are
not satisfactorily resolved. Subscribers may choose to cancel their subscription at any time
prior to the renewal date. When we add subscribers as rapidly as we did in the first
quarters of 2011 and 2010, which corresponded with the airing of seasons one and two of
NBCs television show Who Do You Think You Are?, the rate of subscriber cancellation, or
churn, may also increase as it did in the second quarters of 2011 and 2010. In these
periods, churn rose to 4.6% and 4.3%, respectively, from 3.7% and 3.3% in the first quarters
of 2011 and 2010, respectively. If we are unable to attract new subscribers in numbers
greater than our subscriber churn, our subscriber base will decrease and our business,
financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
If our subscriber churn increases, we may be required to increase the rate at which we
add new subscribers in order to maintain and grow our revenues. If excessive numbers of
subscribers cancel our service, we may be required to incur significantly higher marketing
and advertising expenses than we currently anticipate to replace these subscribers with new
subscribers. A significant increase in our subscriber churn may have an adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A change in our mix of subscription durations could have a significant impact on our
revenues, churn and revenue visibility.
A majority of our subscribers has annual subscriptions. At any point in time, however,
the majority of new subscribers generally signs up for monthly subscriptions and may or may
not choose to renew. We generally experience higher rates of churn for monthly subscribers
than for annual subscribers. As of June 30, 2011, the percentage of overall subscribers that
were monthly subscribers had increased by 3 percentage points to 33% at June 30, 2011 from
30% at June 30, 2010. If this trend continues, more of our revenues would become dependent
on monthly renewals, and we would likely have higher churn. We continually evaluate the
types of subscriptions that are most appropriate for us and our subscribers. As we make
these evaluations, we may more aggressively market subscriptions that are shorter than our
annual subscriptions. Any material change in our mix of subscription duration could have a
significant impact on our revenues and churn.
Additionally, the largely annual commitments of our subscribers enhance our near-term
visibility on our revenues, which we believe enables us to more effectively manage the
growth of our business and provide working capital benefits. A shift in subscriber mix
towards more monthly subscriptions may result in diminished visibility with respect to
forecasting revenues, which could make it more difficult to manage our growth and
effectively budget future working capital requirements.
Because we recognize revenues from subscriptions to our service over the term of the
subscription, downturns or upturns in subscriptions may not be immediately reflected in our
operating results and therefore could affect our operating results in later periods.
We recognize revenues from subscribers ratably over the term of their subscriptions.
Given that annual subscriptions represent a majority of our subscriptions, a large portion
of our revenues for each quarter reflects deferred revenues from subscriptions entered into
during previous quarters. Consequently, a decline in new or renewed subscriptions in any one
quarter will not necessarily be fully reflected in revenues in that quarter but will
negatively affect our revenues in future quarters. Accordingly, the effect of significant
downturns or upturns in subscriptions or market acceptance of our service, or changes in
subscriber churn, may not fully impact our results of operations until future periods.
26
Table of Contents
If our marketing and advertising efforts fail to generate additional revenues on a
cost-effective basis, or if we are unable to manage our marketing and advertising expenses,
it could harm our results of operations and growth.
Our future growth and profitability, as well as the maintenance and enhancement of our
brands, will depend in large part on the effectiveness and efficiency of our marketing and
advertising expenditures and the continued success of television programming related to
family history. We use a diverse mix of fixed-cost and performance-based marketing and
advertising programs to promote our products and services, and we periodically adjust our
mix of marketing and advertising programs. We have experienced price increases in some of
our marketing and advertising channels. Significant increases in the pricing of one or more
of our marketing and advertising channels would increase our marketing and advertising
expense or cause us to choose less expensive but potentially less effective marketing and
advertising channels. Television advertising comprises a large percentage of our marketing
and advertising expense, which may have significantly higher costs than other channels and
which could adversely affect our profitability. Further, we may over time become
disproportionately reliant on one channel or partner, such as NBC in future seasons of Who
Do You Think You Are?, which could increase our operating expenses. We have incurred and
may in the future incur marketing and advertising expenses significantly in advance of the
time we anticipate recognizing revenues associated with such expenses, as in the case of
television programming, and our marketing and advertising expenditures may not continue to
result in increased revenues or generate sufficient levels of brand awareness. If we are
unable to maintain our marketing and advertising channels on cost-effective terms or replace
existing marketing and advertising channels with similarly effective channels, our marketing
and advertising expenses could increase substantially, our subscriber levels could be
affected adversely, and our business, financial condition and results of operations may
suffer. In addition, our expanded marketing efforts may increase our subscriber acquisition
cost, as additional expenses may not result in sufficient customer growth to offset cost,
which would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We have begun to distribute free software applications as part of our marketing efforts
to retain and attract new subscribers. If service providers involved in the distribution of
our free applications were to impose fees or commissions upon us in connection with the
applications, with or without our consent, we may be forced to cease distributing the
applications through the service providers or have limited information about our customers,
forcing us to incur additional expense to distribute our applications and obtain customer
information, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We cannot predict whether the television show Who Do You Think You Are? will continue to
have an impact on our business in the future.
We have purchased product integration in all three seasons of the television show Who
Do You Think You Are? in the United States, including seasons one and two, which aired in
2010 and 2011 respectively, and season three, which NBC announced for the upcoming 2011-2012
television season. Although the airing of this series, together with our increased
television advertising, caused increased interest in our core business that resulted in a
greater number of subscribers, we cannot guarantee that the show will have a long-term
favorable effect on our net income. We cannot assure you that NBC will air any future
seasons of the show, including the third season or, if they do, that we will always
participate. If we do not receive lasting benefits from Who Do You Think You Are?, or if
the show does not continue to be well received or cancelled, it could have a negative effect
on our business and our stock price. If NBC were to air the third season of Who Do You
Think You Are? late in 2011, instead of in 2012 as currently expected, we would likely
incur expenses earlier than anticipated, which would likely have a negative impact on our
2011 results of operations.
Because we generate substantially all of our revenues from online family history resources,
particularly in the United States and United Kingdom, a decline in demand for our services
or for online family history resources in general, and particularly of the United States and
United Kingdom, could cause our revenues to decline.
We generate substantially all of our revenues from our online family history services,
and we expect that we will continue to depend upon our online family history services for
substantially all of our revenues in the foreseeable future. Because we depend on our online
family history services, factors such as changes in consumer preferences for these products
may have a disproportionately greater impact on us than if we offered multiple services. The
market for online family history resources, and for consumer services in general, is subject
to rapidly changing consumer demand and trends in preferences. If consumer interest in our
online family history services declines, or if consumer interest in family history in
general declines, we would likely experience a significant loss of revenues and net income.
Some of the potential factors that could affect interest in and demand for online family
history services include:
| individuals interest in, and their willingness to spend time and money, conducting family history research; |
| availability of discretionary funds; |
| awareness of our brand and the family history category, including through the television show Who Do You Think You Are?; |
27
Table of Contents
| the appeal, reliability and performance of our services; |
| the price, performance and availability of competing family history products and services; |
| public concern regarding privacy and data security; |
| our ability to maintain high levels of customer satisfaction; and |
| the rate of growth in online commerce generally. |
In addition, substantially all of our revenues are from subscribers in the United
States, the United Kingdom, and to a lesser extent, Canada and Australia. Consequently, a
decrease of interest in and demand for online family history services, or increased
competition, in these countries could have a disproportionately greater impact on us than if
our geographical mix of revenues were to be less concentrated.
Challenges in acquiring historical content and making it available online could adversely
affect our ability to retain and expand our subscriber base, and therefore adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In order to retain and expand our subscriber base, both domestically and
internationally, we must continue to expend significant resources to acquire significant
amounts of additional historical content, digitize it and make it available to our
subscribers online. We face legal, logistical, cultural and commercial challenges in
acquiring new content. Relevant governmental records may be widely dispersed and held at a
national, state or local level.
Religious and private records are even more widely dispersed. These problems often pose
particular challenges in acquiring content internationally. Desirable content may not be
available to us on favorable terms, or at all, due to competition for a particular
collection, privacy concerns relative to information contained in a given collection or our
lack of negotiating leverage with a certain content provider. For example, some of our most
popular databases include vital records content namely, historical birth, marriage and
death records made available by certain governmental agencies. To help prevent identity
theft, or even terrorist activities, governments may attempt to restrict the release of all
or substantial portions of their vital records content, and particularly birth records, to
third parties. If these efforts are successful, it may limit or altogether prevent us from
acquiring these types of vital record content or continuing to make them available online.
In some cases, we have to lobby for legislation to be changed or otherwise work to surmount
administrative or other bureaucratic hurdles to enable government or other bodies to grant
us access to records.
While we own or license most of the images in our database, we generally do not own the
underlying historical documents. If owners of content have sold or licensed the rights to
digitize that content, even on a non-exclusive basis, they may elect not to sell or license
it for digitization purposes to any other person. Therefore, if one of our competitors
acquires rights to digitize a set of content, even on a non-exclusive basis, we may be
unable to acquire rights to digitize that content. Conversely, the owners of historical
records may allow more than one party to digitize those records and our competitors may
digitize and make available the same content that we offer. In some cases, acquisition of
content involves competitive bidding, and we may choose not to bid or may not successfully
bid to acquire content rights. In addition, a number of governmental bodies and other
organizations are interested in making historical content available for free and owners of
historical records may license or sell their records to such governmental bodies and
organizations in addition to or instead of licensing or selling their content to us. Our
inability to offer vital records or other valuable content as part of our family history
research databases or the widespread availability of such content elsewhere at lower cost or
for free could result in our subscription services becoming less valuable to consumers,
which could have an adverse impact on our number of subscribers or subscriber churn, and
therefore on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We depend in part upon third party licenses for some of our historical content, and a loss
of these licenses, or disputes regarding royalties under these licenses, could adversely
affect our ability to retain and expand our subscriber base, and therefore adversely affect
our revenues, financial condition and results of operations.
We acquire a portion of our content pursuant to ongoing license agreements. Some of
these agreements have finite terms and we may not be able to renew the agreements on terms
that are advantageous to us or at all. For example, we license a significant amount of our
United Kingdom content from the United Kingdom National Archives under several license
agreements that generally have ten year terms that begin expiring as soon as 2012, and which
have varying automatic extension periods. The agreements are generally terminable by either
party for breach by the other party and by the United Kingdom National Archives upon our
insolvency or bankruptcy. Some of these agreements permit the United Kingdom National
Archives to terminate these licenses if we undergo a change of control.
28
Table of Contents
If a current or future license for a significant content collection were to be
terminated, we may not be able to obtain a new license on terms advantageous to us or at all
and we could be required to remove the relevant content from our Web sites, either
immediately or after some period of time. If a content provider were to license or sell us
content in violation of that content providers agreements with other parties, we could be
required to remove that content from our Web sites. If we were required to remove a material
amount of content from our Web sites, as a result of the termination of one or more licenses
or otherwise, it could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Some of
these license agreements restrict the manner in which we use the applicable content, which
could limit our ability to leverage that content for new uses as we expand our business. We
pay royalties under some of these license agreements, and the other party to those
royalty-bearing agreements may have a right to audit the calculation of our royalty
payments. If there were to be a disagreement regarding the calculation of royalty payments,
we could be required to make additional payments under those agreements. We also have
indemnification obligations under many of these agreements. We could experience claims in
the future which, if material, could have a negative impact on our results of operations and
financial condition.
Digitizing and indexing new content can take a significant amount of time and expense, and
can expose us to risks associated with the loss or damage of historical documents. Our
inability to maintain or acquire content or make new content available online in a timely
and cost-effective manner, or liability for loss of historical documents, could have an
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Digitizing and indexing new historical content can take a significant amount of time
and expense and we generally incur the expenses related to such content significantly in
advance of the time we can make it available to our subscribers. We have invested over $100
million to acquire and develop content, including content acquired through business
acquisitions, and we expect to continue to spend significant resources on content. Increases
in the cost or time required to digitize and index new content could harm our financial
results. Currently, two transcription vendors perform a substantial portion of our data
transcription as measured by cost. We do not have long-term contracts with any of our
transcription vendors. If we were to replace one of these transcription vendors for any
reason, we would be required to provide extensive training to the new vendor, which could
delay our ability to make our new content available to our subscribers, and our
relationships with the new transcription vendors may be on financial or other terms less
favorable to us than our existing arrangements. Our inability to maintain or acquire content
or to make new content available online in a timely and cost-effective manner would have an
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
While we are digitizing content, we may be in possession of valuable and irreplaceable
original historical documents. While we maintain insurance with respect to such documents,
any loss or damage to such documents, while in our possession, could cause us significant
expense and could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and the potential
willingness of content owners to license or lend their content to us.
We face competition from a number of different sources, and our failure to compete
effectively could adversely impact our revenues, results of operations and financial
condition.
We face competition in our business from a variety of organizations, some of which
provide genealogical records free of charge. We expect competition to increase in the
future. Many external factors, including the cost of marketing, content acquisition and
technology and our current and future competitors pricing and marketing strategies, can
significantly affect our competitive strategies, including pricing. Some of our competitors
provide genealogical records free of charge. If we fail to meet our subscribers
expectations, we could fail to retain existing or attract new subscribers, either of which
could harm our business and results of operations.
Ancestry.com and our similar international Web sites face competition from:
| FamilySearch, and its Web site FamilySearch.org, a genealogy organization that is part of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. FamilySearch has an extensive collection of paper and microfilm records. FamilySearch has digitized a large quantity of these records and has published them online at FamilySearch.org, where it makes them available to the public for free and through thousands of family history centers located throughout the world. FamilySearch is a well-funded organization and is undertaking a large-scale digitization project to make its collection available online. FamilySearch could partner with commercial entities to broaden the distribution of its records. |
| Commercial entities, including online genealogical research services, library content distributors, search engines and portals, retailers of books and software related to genealogical research and family tree creation and family history oriented social networking Web sites. |
| Non-profit entities and organizations, genealogical societies, governments and agencies that may make vital statistics or other records available to the public for free or that partner with commercial entities to make their records widely-available. For example, Yad Vashem, a Jerusalem-based archive devoted to the documentation, research, education and commemoration of the Holocaust, has partnered with Google to facilitate free online access to the worlds largest historical collection on the Holocaust. |
29
Table of Contents
We expect our competition to grow, both through industry consolidation and the
emergence of new participants. Our future competitors may include other Internet-based and
offline businesses, governments and other entities. The market for Internet-based services
evolves at a very rapid pace and our competitors may offer products and services that are
superior to any of our products and services. In addition, Internet business models are
constantly changing. The online family history market could move to an advertising-supported
model to the detriment of our subscription-based model. Our competitors may have greater
resources, more well-established brand recognition or more sophisticated technologies, such
as search algorithms, than we do. Additionally, our competitors may more easily obtain
relevant records in domestic and international markets or offer new categories of content,
products or services before us, or at lower prices, which may give them a competitive
advantage in attracting subscribers. To compete effectively, we may need to expend
significant resources on content acquisition, technology or marketing and advertising, which
could reduce our margins and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. If we do not compete effectively, our ability to retain
and expand our subscriber base, and our revenues, results of operations and financial
condition, could be adversely affected.
Our failure to attract, integrate and retain highly qualified personnel in the future could
harm our business.
To execute our growth plan, we must attract and retain highly qualified personnel.
Competition for these employees is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and
retaining qualified personnel. We have from time to time in the past experienced, and we
expect to continue to experience in the future, difficulty in hiring and retaining highly
skilled employees with appropriate qualifications. Many of the companies with which we
compete for experienced personnel have greater resources than we have. In addition, in
making employment decisions, particularly in the Internet and high-technology industries,
job candidates often consider the value of the stock-based awards they may receive in
connection with their employment. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States relating to the expensing of stock-based awards may discourage us from granting the
size or type of awards that job candidates may require to join our company. If our stock
price declines, we may face increased difficulty attracting and retaining personnel through
the use of stock-based awards. If we fail to attract new personnel, or fail to retain and
motivate our current personnel, our business and future growth prospects could be adversely
affected.
Our growth could strain our personnel, technology and infrastructure resources, and if we
are unable to implement appropriate controls and procedures to manage our growth, and hire
and integrate appropriate personnel, we may not be able to successfully implement our
business plan.
Our growth in operations has placed a significant strain on our management,
administrative, technological, operational and financial infrastructure. Anticipated future
growth, including growth related to the broadening of our product and service offerings,
will continue to place similar strains on our personnel, technology and infrastructure. Our
full-time employee headcount increased 20% in 2010 and another 13% through the first half of
2011, and we plan to continue to hire aggressively in the remainder of 2011. Particularly
when adding staff quickly, we may not make optimal hiring decisions or may not integrate
personnel effectively. A sudden increase in the number of our registered users could strain
our capacity and result in Web site performance issues. Our success will depend in part upon
the management ability of our officers with respect to growth opportunities. To manage the
expected growth of our operations, we will need to continue to improve our operational,
financial, technological and management controls and our reporting systems and procedures.
Additional personnel and capital investments will increase our cost base, which, if we fall
short of anticipated revenue growth, will make it more difficult to decrease expenses in the
short term. If we fail to successfully manage our growth, it could adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any significant disruption in service on our Web sites or in our computer systems, which are
currently hosted primarily by a single third-party, could damage our reputation and result
in a loss of subscribers, which would harm our business and operating results.
Subscribers access our service through our Web sites, where our family history research
databases are located, and our internal billing software and operations are integrated with
our product and service offerings. Our brand, reputation and ability to attract, retain and
serve our subscribers depend upon the reliable performance of our Web sites, network
infrastructure, content delivery processes and payment systems. We have experienced
interruptions in these systems in the past, including server failures that temporarily
slowed down our Web sites performance and users access to content, or made our Web sites
inaccessible, and we may experience interruptions in the future. Interruptions in these
systems, whether due to system failures, computer viruses or physical or electronic
break-ins, could affect the security or availability of our Web sites and prevent our
subscribers from accessing our data and using our products and services. Problems with the
reliability or security of our systems may harm our reputation and require disclosure to our
lenders, and the cost of remedying these problems could negatively affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
30
Table of Contents
Substantially all of our communications, network and computer hardware used to operate
our Web sites are co-located in a facility in Salt Lake City, Utah. We do not own or control
the operation of this facility. We have established a disaster recovery facility located at
a third-party facility in Denver, Colorado. Our systems and operations are vulnerable to
damage or interruption from fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure, terrorist
attacks, acts of war, electronic and physical break-ins, computer viruses, earthquakes and
similar events. The occurrence of any of the foregoing events could result in damage to our
systems and hardware or could cause them to fail completely, and our insurance may not cover
such events or may be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur. Our systems
are not completely redundant, so a failure of our system at our primary site could result in
reduced functionality for our subscribers, and a total failure of our systems at both sites
could cause our Web sites to be inaccessible by our subscribers. Problems faced by our
third-party Web hosting provider, with the telecommunications network providers with whom it
contracts or with the systems by which it allocates capacity among its customers, including
us, could adversely affect the experience of our subscribers. Our third-party Web hosting
provider could decide to close its facilities without adequate notice. In addition, any
financial difficulties, such as bankruptcy reorganization, faced by our third-party Web
hosting provider or any of the service providers with whom it contracts may have negative
effects on our business, the nature and extent of which are difficult to predict.
Additionally, if our third-party Web hosting provider is unable to keep up with our growing
needs for capacity, this could have an adverse effect on our business. Any errors, defects,
disruptions or other performance problems with our services could harm our reputation and
have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Businesses or technologies we acquire could prove difficult to integrate, disrupt our
ongoing business, dilute stockholder value or have an adverse effect on our results of
operations.
As part of our business strategy, we may engage in acquisitions of businesses or
technologies to augment our organic or internal growth, as we did in 2010. While we have
engaged in acquisitions in the past, our experience with integrating and managing acquired
businesses or assets is still limited. Acquisitions involve challenges and risks in
negotiation, execution, valuation and integration. Moreover, we may not be able to find
suitable acquisition opportunities on terms that are acceptable to us. Even if successfully
negotiated, closed and integrated, certain acquisitions may not advance our business
strategy, may fall short of expected return-on-investment targets or may fail. Any recent or
future acquisition could involve numerous risks including:
| potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of management; | |
| difficulty integrating the operations and products of the acquired business; | |
| use of cash or borrowings under our credit facility or otherwise to fund the acquisition or for unanticipated expenses; | |
| inability to effectively operate the new business; | |
| exposure to unknown liabilities, including litigation, against the companies we acquire; | |
| additional costs due to differences in culture, geographical locations and duplication of key talent; | |
| acquisition-related accounting charges affecting our balance sheet and results of operations; | |
| difficulty integrating the financial reports of the acquired business in our consolidated financial statements and implementing our internal controls in the acquired business; | |
| potential impairment of goodwill and acquired intangible assets; | |
| dilution to our current stockholders from the issuance of equity securities; and | |
| potential loss of key employees or customers of the acquired company. |
In the event we enter into any acquisition agreements, closing of the transactions
could be delayed or prevented by regulatory approval requirements, including antitrust
review, or other conditions. We may not be successful in addressing these risks or any other
problems encountered in connection with any attempted acquisitions, and we could assume the
economic risks of such failed or unsuccessful acquisitions.
We face many risks associated with our plans to continue to expand our international
offerings and marketing and advertising efforts, which could harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
In addition to our United States and United Kingdom Web sites, we have launched Web
sites directed at Canada, Australia, Sweden, Germany, France, Italy and China and launched
our global Mundia.com Web site. As of June 30, 2011, approximately 29% of subscribers to our
Ancestry.com Web sites, and, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, approximately 25% of
our subscription revenues were from locations outside the United States. We are subject to
many of the risks of doing business internationally, including the following:
| exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; | |
| compliance with changing tax laws and the interpretation of those laws; |
31
Table of Contents
| compliance with changing and conflicting legal and regulatory regimes; | |
| compliance with U.S. laws affecting operations outside of the U.S., including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; | |
| compliance with varying and conflicting intellectual property laws; | |
| difficulties in staffing and managing international operations; | |
| prevention of business or user fraud; and | |
| effective implementation of internal controls and processes across diverse operations and a dispersed employee base. |
We anticipate that our continuing international expansion will entail increased
marketing and advertising of our products, services and brands, and the development of
localized Web sites throughout our geographical markets. We may not succeed in these efforts
or achieve our subscriber acquisition or other goals. For some international markets,
customer preferences and buying behaviors may be different than those in our current
markets, and we may use business models that are different from our traditional subscription
models. Our revenues from new foreign markets may not exceed the costs of acquiring,
establishing, marketing and maintaining international offerings, and therefore may not be
profitable on a sustained basis, if at all. The risks of international expansion include:
| difficulties in developing and marketing our offerings and brands as a result of distance, language and cultural differences; | |
| more stringent consumer and data protection laws; | |
| inability to effectively deal with local socio-economic and political conditions; | |
| technical difficulties and costs associated with the localization of our service offerings; | |
| strong local competitors; and | |
| lack of experience in certain geographical markets. |
One or more of these factors could harm our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
If we are unable to improve market recognition of and loyalty to our brands, or if our
reputation were to be harmed, we could lose subscribers or fail to increase the number of
subscribers, which could harm our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.
We believe that maintaining and enhancing our Ancestry.com brand and other brands is
critical to our success. We believe that the importance of brand recognition and loyalty
will only increase in light of increasing competition in our markets. We plan to continue to
promote our brands, both domestically and internationally, but there is no guarantee that
our selected strategies will increase the favorable recognition of our brands. Some of our
existing and potential competitors, including search engines, media companies and government
and religious institutions have well-established brands with greater brand recognition than
we have.
Additionally, from time to time, our subscribers express dissatisfaction with our
service, including, among other things, dissatisfaction with our auto-renewal and other
billing policies, our handling of personal data and the way our services operate. To the
extent that dissatisfaction with our service is widespread or not adequately addressed, our
brand may be adversely impacted. If our efforts to promote and maintain our brand are not
successful, our operating results and our ability to attract and retain subscribers may be
adversely affected. In addition, even if our brand recognition and loyalty increases, this
may not result in increased use of our products and services or higher revenues. Many of our
subscribers are passionate about family history research, and many of these subscribers
participate in blogs on this topic both on our Web sites and elsewhere. If actions we take
or changes we make to our products upset these subscribers, their blogging could negatively
affect our brand and reputation, which could harm our revenues, results of operations and
financial condition.
32
Table of Contents
Our future growth may differ materially from our historic growth rates and our
projections, which could harm our results of operations and financial condition.
Online family history research is a relatively young industry. Consequently, it is
difficult to predict the ultimate size of the industry and the acceptance by the market of
our products and services. Our business strategy and projections rely on a number of
assumptions, some or all of which may be incorrect. For example, we believe that consumers
will be willing to pay for subscriptions to our online family history resources,
notwithstanding the fact that some of our current and future competitors may provide such
resources free of charge. We cannot accurately predict whether our products and services
will achieve significant acceptance by potential users in significantly larger numbers than
at present. You should therefore not rely on our historic growth rates as an indication of
future growth.
If we are unable to continually enhance our products and services and adapt them to
technological changes and subscriber needs, we may not remain competitive and our business
may fail to grow or decline.
Our business is rapidly changing. To remain competitive, we must continue to provide
relevant content and enhance and improve the functionality and features of our products and
services. If we fail to do so, or if competitors introduce new solutions embodying new
technologies, our existing products and services may become obsolete. Our future success
will depend, among other things, on our ability to:
| anticipate demand for new products and services; | |
| enhance our existing solutions, cross-platform compatibility, systems capacity and processing speed; and | |
| respond to technological advances on a cost-effective and timely basis. |
Developing the technologies in our products entails significant technical and business
risks. We may use new technologies ineffectively, or we may fail to adapt our products and
services to the demands of our subscribers. If we face material delays in introducing new or
enhanced solutions, our subscribers may forego the use of our solutions in favor of those of
our competitors.
Undetected product or service errors or defects could result in the loss of revenues,
delayed market acceptance of our products or services or claims against us.
We offer a variety of Internet-based services and a software product, Family Tree
Maker, which are complex and frequently upgraded. Our Internet-based services and software
product may contain undetected errors, defects, failures or viruses, especially when first
introduced or when new versions or enhancements are released. Despite product testing, our
products, or third party products that we incorporate into ours, may contain undetected
errors, defects or viruses that could, among other things:
| require us to make extensive changes to our subscription services or software product, which would increase our expenses; | |
| expose us to claims for damages; | |
| require us to incur additional technical support costs; | |
| cause a negative registered user reaction that could reduce future sales; | |
| generate negative publicity regarding us and our subscription services and software product; or | |
| result in subscribers delaying their subscription or software purchase or electing not to renew their subscriptions. |
Any of these occurrences could have an adverse effect upon our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Privacy concerns could require us to incur significant expense and modify our operations in
a manner that could result in restrictions and prohibitions on our use of certain
information, and therefore harm our business.
As part of our business, we make biographical and historical data available through our
Web sites, we use registered users personal data for internal purposes and we host Web
sites and message boards, among other things, that contain content supplied by third
parties. In addition, in connection with our Ancestry.com DNA product, we obtain biological
DNA samples used for genetic testing. For privacy or security reasons, privacy groups,
governmental agencies and individuals may seek to restrict or prevent our use or publication
of certain biological or historical information pertaining to individuals, particularly
living persons. We will also face additional privacy issues as we expand into other
international markets, as many nations have privacy protections more stringent than those in
the United States. We have incurred, and will continue to incur, expenses to comply with
privacy and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards
or contractual obligations. Increased domestic or international regulation of data
utilization and distribution practices, including self-regulation, could require us to
modify our operations and incur significant expense, which could have an adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
33
Table of Contents
Our possession and use of personal information presents risks and expenses that could
harm our business. Unauthorized disclosure or manipulation of such data, whether through
breach of our network security or otherwise, could expose us to costly litigation and damage
our reputation.
Maintaining our network security is of critical importance because our online systems
store confidential registered user, employee and other sensitive data, such as names,
addresses, credit card numbers and other personal information. In particular, almost all of
our subscribers use credit and debit cards to purchase our products and services. If we or
our processing vendors were to have problems with our billing software, it could have an
adverse effect on our subscriber satisfaction and could cause one or more of the major
credit card companies to disallow our continued use of their payment services. In addition,
if our billing software fails to work properly and, as a result, we do not automatically
charge our subscribers credit cards on a timely basis or at all, our business, financial
condition, cash flows and results of operations could be adversely affected.
In addition, our online systems store the content that our registered users upload onto
our Web sites, such as family records and photos. This content is often personally
meaningful, and our registered users may rely on our online system to store digital copies
of such content. If we were to lose such content, if our users private content were to be
publicly available or if third parties were able to access and manipulate such content, we
may face liability and harm to our brand and reputation.
We and our vendors use commercially available encryption technology to transmit
personal information when taking orders. We use security and business controls to limit
access and use of personal information, including registered users uploaded content.
However, third parties may be able to circumvent these security and business measures by
developing and deploying viruses, worms and other malicious software programs that are
designed to attack or attempt to infiltrate our systems and networks. In addition, employee
error, malfeasance or other errors in the storage, use or transmission of personal
information could result in a breach of registered user or employee privacy.
If third parties improperly obtain and use the personal information of our registered
users or employees, we may be required to expend significant resources to resolve these
problems. A major breach of our network security and systems could have serious negative
consequences for our businesses, including possible fines, penalties and damages, reduced
demand for our products and services, an unwillingness of subscribers to provide us with
their credit card or payment information, an unwillingness of registered users to upload
family records or photos onto our Web sites, harm to our reputation and brand and loss of
our ability to accept and process subscriber credit card orders. Similarly, if a
well-publicized breach of data security at any other major consumer Web site were to occur,
there could be a general public loss of confidence in the use of the Internet for commercial
transactions. Any of these events could have adverse effects on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Any claims related to activities of registered users and the content they upload could
result in expenses that could harm our results of operations and financial condition.
Our registered users often upload their own content onto our Web sites. The terms of
use of such content are set forth in the terms and conditions of our Web sites and a
submission agreement to which registered users must agree when they upload their content.
Disputes or negative publicity about the use of such content could make members more
reluctant to upload personal content or harm our reputation. We do not review or monitor
content uploaded by our registered users, and could face claims arising from or liability
for making any such content available on our Web sites. In addition, our collaboration tools
and other features of our site allow registered users to contact each other. While
registered users can choose to remain anonymous in such communications, registered users may
choose to engage with one another without anonymity. If any such contact were to lead to
fraud or other harm, we may face claims against us and negative publicity. Litigation to
defend these claims or efforts to counter any negative publicity could be costly and any
other liabilities we incur in connection with any such claims may harm our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Increases in credit card processing fees would increase our operating expenses and adversely
affect our results of operations, and the termination of our relationship with any major
credit card company could have a severe, negative impact on our ability to collect revenues
from subscribers.
Almost all of our subscribers pay for our products and services using credit cards.
From time to time, the major credit card companies or the issuing banks may increase the
fees that they charge for each transaction using their cards. An increase in those fees
would require us to increase the prices we charge for our products and services or
negatively impact our profitability, either of which could adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, our credit card fees may be increased by credit card companies if our
chargeback rate or the refund rate exceeds certain thresholds. If we are unable to maintain
our chargeback rate at acceptable levels, our credit card fees for chargeback transactions,
or for all credit card transactions, may be increased, and, if the problem significantly
worsens, credit card companies may further increase our fees or terminate their
relationships with us. Any increases in our credit card fees could adversely affect our
results of operations, particularly if we elect not to raise our subscription rates to
offset the increase. The termination of our ability to process payments on any major credit
or debit card would significantly impair our ability to collect revenues from subscribers.
34
Table of Contents
Our operating results depend on numerous factors and may fluctuate from period to
period, which could make them difficult to predict.
Our quarterly and annual operating results are tied to certain financial and
operational metrics that have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate significantly in the
future. As a result, you should not rely upon our past operating results as indicators of
future performance. Our operating results depend on numerous factors, many of which are
outside of our control. For the reasons set forth in this Risk Factors section or other
reasons, the results of any prior quarterly or annual periods should not be relied upon as
indications of our future performance and our revenues and operating results in the future
may differ materially from the expectations of management or investors.
If government regulation of the Internet or other areas of our business changes or if
consumer attitudes toward use of the Internet change, we may need to change the manner in
which we conduct our business in a manner that is less profitable or incur greater operating
expenses, which could harm our results of operations.
The adoption, modification or interpretation of laws or regulations relating to the
Internet or other areas of our business could adversely affect the manner in which we
conduct our business or the overall popularity or growth in use of the Internet. Such laws
and regulations may cover automatic subscription renewal, credit card processing procedures,
sales and other procedures, tariffs, user privacy, data protection, pricing, content,
copyrights, distribution, electronic contracts, consumer protection, broadband residential
Internet access and the characteristics and quality of services. In foreign countries, such
as countries in Europe, such laws may be more restrictive than in the United States. It is
not clear how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, sales and other
taxes, libel and personal privacy apply to the Internet. If we are required to comply with
new regulations or legislation or new interpretations of existing regulations or
legislation, this compliance could cause us to incur additional expenses, make it more
difficult to renew subscriptions automatically, make it more difficult to attract new
subscribers or otherwise alter our business model. Any of these outcomes could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our revenues may be adversely affected if we are required to charge sales taxes in
additional jurisdictions and/or other taxes for our products and services.
We collect or have imposed upon us sales or other taxes related to the products and
services we sell in certain states and other jurisdictions. Additional states or one or more
countries or other jurisdictions may seek to impose sales or other tax collection
obligations on us in the future or states or jurisdictions in which we already pay tax may
increase the amount of taxes we are required to pay. A successful assertion by any country,
state or other jurisdiction in which we do business that we should be collecting sales or
other taxes on the sale of our products and services could, among other things, result in
substantial tax liabilities for past sales, create significant administrative burdens for
us, discourage registered users from purchasing from us or otherwise substantially harm our
business and results of operations.
Our credit facility contains a number of financial and operating covenants which could limit
our flexibility in operating our business.
Our credit facility contains a number of financial and operating covenants that could
limit our flexibility in operating our business, including a covenant to maintain a
specified ratio of a measure of certain funded indebtedness (excluding subordinated
indebtedness) to a measure of EBITDA (as EBITDA is defined in our credit facility) and a
covenant to maintain a specified ratio of a measure of EBITDA to a measure of fixed charges.
As of June 30, 2011, we had no borrowings outstanding under our credit facility. Our
future indebtedness could:
| make us more vulnerable to unfavorable economic conditions; | |
| make it more difficult to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures or other general corporate purposes; | |
| limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the markets in which we operate; | |
| require us to dedicate or reserve a large portion of our cash flow from operations for making payments on our indebtedness, which would prevent us from using it for other purposes; | |
| make us susceptible to fluctuations in market interest rates that affect the cost of our borrowings to the extent that our variable rate debt is not covered by interest rate derivative agreements, if any; and | |
| make it more difficult to pursue strategic acquisitions, alliances and collaborations. |
35
Table of Contents
Any obligations under our credit facility are secured by collateral, which includes
substantially all of our assets, including our intellectual property. If we draw funds under
our credit facility and we are not able to satisfy our obligations under the credit
facility, the lenders could exercise their rights under the credit facility, including
taking control of the collateral, including our intellectual property, which would have a
material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we cannot assure you that our lenders
will have sufficient liquidity to provide funds to us if and when we seek to borrow under
the credit facility.
We face risks associated with currency exchange rate fluctuations, which could adversely
affect our revenues and operating results.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, approximately 22% of our total revenues were
received, and approximately 17% of our total expenses were paid, in currencies other than
the United States dollar, such as the British pound sterling, the Canadian dollar and the
Australian dollar. As a result, we are at risk for exchange rate fluctuations between such
foreign currencies and the United States dollar, which could affect our revenues and results
of operations. If the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, the translation of
these foreign currency denominated transactions will result in decreased revenues, operating
expenses and net income. We may not be able to offset adverse foreign currency impact with
increased subscription pricing or volume. We attempt to limit our exposure by paying our
operating expenses incurred in foreign jurisdictions with revenues received in the
applicable currency, but if we do not have enough local currency to pay all our expenses in
that currency, we are exposed to currency exchange rate risk with respect to those expenses.
We are also exposed to exchange rate risk with respect to our revenues earned in foreign
currencies. Even if we were to implement hedging strategies to mitigate foreign currency
risk, these strategies might not eliminate our exposure to foreign exchange rate
fluctuations and would involve costs and risks of their own, such as ongoing management time
and expertise, external costs to implement the strategies and potential accounting
implications.
Our business may be significantly impacted by a change in the economy, including any
resulting effect on consumer spending.
Our business may be affected by changes in the economy generally, including any
resulting effect on consumer spending specifically. Our products and services are
discretionary purchases, and consumers may reduce their discretionary spending on our
products and services during an economic downturn such as the one we recently experienced.
Although we did not experience a material increase in subscription cancellations or a
material reduction in subscription renewals during that downturn, we may yet be impacted if
employment and personal income do not improve. Conversely, consumers may spend more time
using the Internet during an economic downturn and may have less time for our products and
services in a period of economic growth. In addition, we have already seen a rise in media
prices, including television advertising, and prices may further increase if the economy
continues to recover or grow, which could significantly increase our marketing and
advertising expenses. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of
operations may be significantly affected by changes in the economy generally.
The loss of one or more of our key personnel could harm our business.
We depend on the continued service and performance of our key personnel, including
Timothy Sullivan, our President and Chief Executive Officer. We do not maintain key man
insurance on any of our officers or key employees. We also do not have long-term employment
agreements with any of our officers or key employees. In addition, much of our key
technology and systems are custom-made for our business by our personnel. The loss of key
personnel, including key members of our management team, as well as certain of our key
marketing, product development or technology personnel could disrupt our operations and have
an adverse effect on our ability to operate our business.
We have made significant estimates in calculating our income tax provision and other tax
assets and liabilities. If these estimates are incorrect, our operating results and
financial condition may be adversely affected.
We are subject to regular review and audit by both domestic and foreign tax
authorities. Any adverse outcome of such a review or audit could have a negative effect on
our operating results and financial condition. In addition, the determination of our
provision for income taxes and other tax assets and liabilities requires significant
judgment, and there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax
determination is uncertain at the present time. Although we believe our estimates are
reasonable, the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial
statements and may have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Expenses or liabilities resulting from litigation could adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
From time to time, we may be subject to claims or litigation. Any such claims or
litigation may be time-consuming and costly, divert management resources, require us to
change our products and services, require us to accept returns of software products or have
other adverse effects on our business. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations and could require us to pay significant monetary
damages. For example, in August 2009, we received a letter from Shutterfly, Inc., alleging
infringement of certain of their patents by our operation of the MyCanvas.com Web site.
While MyCanvas.com revenues have represented a small percentage of our total revenues,
intellectual property litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and there can be no
assurance that the expenses associated with defending any litigation or the resolution of
this dispute would not have a material adverse impact on our results of operations or cash
flows. We cannot assure you of the ultimate outcome of any legal proceeding or contingency
in which we are or may become involved.
36
Table of Contents
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
If our intellectual property and technologies are not adequately protected to prevent use or
appropriation by our competitors, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be
diminished, and our business may be adversely affected.
Our future success and competitive position depend in part on our ability to protect
our proprietary technologies and intellectual property. We rely and expect to continue to
rely on a combination of confidentiality and license agreements with our employees,
consultants and third parties with whom we have relationships, as well as trademark,
copyright, patent and trade secret protection laws, to protect our proprietary technologies
and intellectual property. Many of our trademarks contain words or terms having a somewhat
common usage and, as a result, we may have difficulty registering them in certain
jurisdictions. Although we possess intellectual property rights in some aspects of our
digital content, search technology, software products and digitization and indexing
processes, our digital content is not protected by any registered copyrights or other
registered intellectual property or statutory rights. Rather, our digital content is
protected by user agreements that limit access to and use of our data, and by our
proprietary indexing and search technology that we apply to make our digital content
searchable. However, compliance with use restrictions is difficult to monitor, and our
proprietary rights in our digital content databases may be more difficult to enforce than
other forms of intellectual property rights.
There can be no assurance that the steps we take will be adequate to protect our
technologies and intellectual property, that our patent and trademark applications will lead
to issued patents and registered trademarks in all instances, that others will not develop
or patent similar or superior technologies, products or services, or that our patents,
trademarks and other intellectual property will not be challenged, invalidated or
circumvented by others. Furthermore, the intellectual property laws of other countries at
which our Web sites are or may be in the future be directed may not protect our products and
intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. The legal
standards relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of intellectual
property rights in Internet-related industries are uncertain and still evolving, both in the
United States and in other countries. In addition, third parties may knowingly or
unknowingly infringe our patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights, and
litigation may be necessary to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights. Any
such litigation could be very costly and could divert management attention and resources. If
the protection of our technologies and intellectual property is inadequate to prevent use or
appropriation by third parties, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be
diminished and competitors may be able to more effectively mimic our subscription services
and methods of operations. Any of these events would have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
We also expect that the more successful we are, the more likely it will become that
competitors will try to develop products that are similar to ours, which may infringe on our
proprietary rights. It may also be more likely that competitors will claim that our products
and services infringe on their proprietary rights. If we are unable to protect our
proprietary rights or if third parties independently develop or gain access to our or
similar technologies, our business, revenues, reputation and competitive position could be
harmed.
Confidentiality agreements with employees and others may not adequately prevent disclosure
of trade secrets and other proprietary information. Failure to protect our proprietary
information could make it easier for third parties to compete with our products and harm our
business.
A substantial amount of our tools and technologies are protected by trade secret laws.
In order to protect our proprietary technologies and processes, we rely in part on security
measures, as well as confidentiality agreements with our employees, licensees, independent
contractors and other advisors. These measures and agreements may not effectively prevent
disclosure of confidential information, including trade secrets, and may not provide an
adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. We
could potentially lose future trade secret protection if any unauthorized disclosure of such
information occurs. In addition, others may independently discover our trade secrets and
proprietary information, and in such cases we could not assert any trade secret rights
against such parties. Laws regarding trade secret rights in certain markets in which we
operate may afford little or no protection to our trade secrets. The loss of trade secret
protection could make it easier for third parties to compete with our products by copying
functionality. In addition, any changes in or unexpected interpretations of the trade secret
and other intellectual property laws in any country in which we operate may compromise our
ability to enforce our trade secret and intellectual property rights. Costly and
time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our
proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could
adversely affect our business, revenues, reputation and competitive position.
37
Table of Contents
Intellectual property claims against us could be costly and result in the loss of
significant rights related to, among other things, our Web sites, content indexes, and
marketing and advertising activities.
Trademark, copyright, patent and other intellectual property rights are important to us
and other companies. Our intellectual property rights extend to our technologies, business
processes and the content on our Web sites. We use intellectual property licensed from third
parties in merchandising our products and marketing and advertising our services. From time
to time, third parties may allege that we have violated their intellectual property rights.
If there is a valid claim against us for infringement, misappropriation, misuse or other
violation of third party intellectual property rights, and we are unable to obtain
sufficient rights or develop non-infringing intellectual property or otherwise alter our
business practices on a timely basis, our business and competitive position may be adversely
affected. Many companies are devoting significant resources to obtaining patents that could
potentially affect many aspects of our business. There are numerous patents that broadly
claim means and methods of conducting business on the Internet. We have not exhaustively
searched patents relevant to our technologies and business. If we are forced to defend
ourselves against intellectual property infringement claims, whether they are with or
without merit or are determined in our favor, we may face costly litigation, diversion of
technical and management personnel, limitations on our ability to use our current Web sites
or inability to market or provide our products or services. As a result of any such dispute,
we may have to develop non-infringing technology, pay damages, enter into royalty or
licensing agreements, cease providing certain products or services, adjust our merchandizing
or marketing and advertising activities or take other actions to resolve the claims. These
actions, if required, may be costly or unavailable on terms acceptable to us. In addition,
many of our co-branding, distribution and other partnering agreements require us to
indemnify our partners for third-party intellectual property infringement claims, which
could increase the cost to us of an adverse ruling in such an action.
In addition, as a publisher of online content, we face potential liability for
negligence, copyright, patent or trademark infringement or other claims based on the nature
and content of data and materials that we publish or distribute. These claims could
potentially arise with respect to both company-acquired content and user-generated content.
Litigation to defend these claims could be costly and any other liabilities we incur in
connection with the claims may harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
If we are unable to protect our domain names, our reputation and brand could be affected
adversely, which may negatively impact our ability to compete.
We have registered domain names for Web site destinations that we use in our business,
such as Ancestry.com, Ancestry.co.uk and iArchives. However, if we are unable to maintain
our rights in these domain names, our competitors could capitalize on our brand recognition
by using these domain names for their own benefit. In addition, our competitors could
capitalize on our brand recognition by using domain names similar to ours. Domain names
similar to ours have been registered in the United States and elsewhere, and in many
countries the top-level domain names ancestry or genealogy are owned by other parties.
Although we own the ancestry.co.uk domain name in the United Kingdom, we might not be able
to, or may choose not to, acquire or maintain other country-specific versions of the
ancestry and genealogy domain names. Further, the relationship between regulations
governing domain names and laws protecting trademarks and similar proprietary rights varies
from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and is unclear in some jurisdictions. We may be unable to
prevent third parties from acquiring and using domain names that infringe on, are similar
to, or otherwise decrease the value of, our brand or our trademarks or service marks.
Protecting and enforcing our rights in our domain names and determining the rights of others
may require litigation, which could result in substantial costs and divert management
attention. We may not prevail if any such litigation is initiated.
Risks Related to our Common Stock and Corporate Structure
Delaware law and our corporate charter and bylaws contain anti-takeover provisions that
could delay or discourage takeover attempts that stockholders may consider favorable.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of
delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. For example, our
board of directors has the authority to issue up to five million shares of preferred stock
in one or more series and to fix the powers, preferences and rights of each series without
stockholder approval. The ability to issue preferred stock could discourage unsolicited
acquisition proposals or make it more difficult for a third party to gain control of our
company, or otherwise could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Our
certificate of incorporation requires that any action to be taken by stockholders must be
taken at a duly called meeting of stockholders, which may only be called by our board of
directors, the chairperson of our board of directors or the chief executive officer, with
the concurrence of a majority of our board of directors, and may not be taken by written
consent. Our bylaws also require that any stockholder proposals or nominations for election
to our board of directors meet specific advance notice requirements and procedures, which
make it more difficult for our stockholders to make proposals or director nominations. In
addition, we have a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms, which
could delay the ability of stockholders to change membership of a majority of our board of
directors.
Furthermore, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions
of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. These provisions may prohibit or
restrict large stockholders, in particular those owning 15% or more of our outstanding
voting stock, from merging or combining with us. These provisions in our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws and under Delaware law could discourage potential takeover attempts
and could reduce the price that investors might be willing to pay for shares of our common
stock in the future and result in our market price being lower than it would without these
provisions.
38
Table of Contents
Our share price may be volatile due to fluctuations in our operating results and other
factors, each of which could cause our stock price to decline.
The market price of shares of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in
response to many risks listed herein and others beyond our control, including:
| actual or anticipated fluctuations in our key operating metrics, financial condition and operating results; | |
| a greater than expected gain or loss of existing subscribers; | |
| a change in one or more of our key metrics; | |
| actual or anticipated changes in our growth rate; | |
| issuance of new or updated research or reports by securities analysts; | |
| our announcement of actual results for a fiscal period that are higher or lower than projected or expected results or our announcement of revenues or earnings guidance that is higher or lower than expected; | |
| fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us; | |
| share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels of our shares; | |
| sales or expected sales of common stock by us or others; or market reaction to announced repurchases of common stock by us; | |
| announcements from, or operating results of, our competitors; or | |
| general economic and market conditions. |
Furthermore, during the last few years, the stock markets have experienced extreme
price and volume fluctuations and the market prices of some equity securities continue to be
volatile. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating
performance of these companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as
general economic, political and market conditions such as recessions, interest rate changes
or international currency fluctuations, may cause the market price of shares of our common
stock to decline. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market
price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the
target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could
result in substantial costs and divert our managements attention from other business
concerns, which could seriously harm our business.
Our stock price may be affected by coverage by securities analysts.
The trading of our common stock is influenced by the reports and research that industry
or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If analysts stop covering us, or if
too few analysts cover us, the trading price of our stock would likely decrease. If one or
more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock, our stock price will likely decline.
If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish
reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause
our stock price or trading volume to decline.
Financial forecasting by us and financial analysts who may publish estimates of our
performance may differ materially from actual results.
Given the dynamic nature of our business, the current uncertain economic climate and
the inherent limitations in predicting the future, forecasts of our revenues, gross margin,
operating expenses, number of paying subscribers and other financial and operating data may
differ materially from actual results. Such discrepancies could cause a decline in the
trading price of our common stock.
Spectrum Equity Investors and its affiliates own a substantial portion of our outstanding
common stock, and their interests may not always coincide with the interests of the other
holders of our common stock.
As of June 30, 2011, Spectrum Equity Investors V, L.P. and certain of its affiliates
beneficially owned in the aggregate shares representing approximately 29% of our outstanding
voting power. Two persons associated with Spectrum Equity
Investors V, L.P. currently serve on our board of directors. As a result, Spectrum
Equity Investors V, L.P. and certain of its affiliates could have influence over all matters
presented to our stockholders for approval, including election and removal of our directors
and change of control transactions. The interests of Spectrum Equity Investors V, L.P. and
certain of its affiliates may not always coincide with the interests of the other holders of
our common stock.
39
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Share repurchase activity during the three months ended June 30, 2011 is summarized as
follows:
Total Number of Shares | Approximate Dollar | |||||||||||||||
Purchased as Part of | Value of Shares that | |||||||||||||||
Total Number | Average | Publicly Announced | May Yet Be | |||||||||||||
of Shares | Price Paid | Plans | Purchased Under the | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | per Share | or Programs(1) | Plans or Programs(1) | ||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
April 1- 30, 2011 |
| | | $ | 125,000 | |||||||||||
May 1-31, 2011 |
1,322 | $ | 40.19 | 1,322 | 71,877 | |||||||||||
June 1-30, 2011 |
666 | 37.51 | 666 | 46,905 | ||||||||||||
Total shares repurchased |
1,988 | 39.29 | 1,988 | |||||||||||||
(1) | On April 28, 2011, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $125.0 million in shares of our outstanding common stock. The shares may be repurchased from time to time through April 30, 2012 in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. |
40
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits |
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Exhibit Description | |||
10.1 | * | First Amendment, dated as of April 8, 2011, to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2010,
among Ancestry.com Operations Inc., certain domestic subsidiaries of Ancestry.com Operations
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and certain other lender parties thereto. |
||
10.2 | Second Amendment, dated as of June 10, 2011, to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2010,
among Ancestry.com Operations Inc., certain domestic subsidiaries of Ancestry.com Operations
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and certain other lender parties thereto. |
|||
10.3 | Joinder Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2011, by and between Ancestry.com DNA LLC and Bank of
America, N.A. |
|||
31.1 | ** | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
||
31.2 | ** | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
||
32.1 | ** | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
||
101.INS | *** | XBRL Instance Document |
||
101.SCH | *** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
||
101.CAL | *** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
||
101.DEF | *** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
||
101.LAB | *** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
||
101.PRE | *** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
* | Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, filed on May 3, 2011 (File No. 001-34518). | |
** | These certifications are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference in any filing we make under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings. | |
*** | In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) documents are furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections. |
41
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
Ancestry.com Inc. |
||||
Dated: August 2, 2011 | By: | /s/ Timothy Sullivan | ||
Timothy Sullivan | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Dated: August 2, 2011 | By: | /s/ Howard Hochhauser | ||
Howard Hochhauser | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
42
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Exhibit Description | |||
10.1 | * | First Amendment, dated as of April 8, 2011, to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2010,
among Ancestry.com Operations Inc., certain domestic subsidiaries of Ancestry.com Operations
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and certain other lender parties thereto. |
||
10.2 | Second Amendment, dated as of June 10, 2011, to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2010,
among Ancestry.com Operations Inc., certain domestic subsidiaries of Ancestry.com Operations
Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and certain other lender parties thereto. |
|||
10.3 | Joinder Agreement, dated as of April 28, 2011, by and between Ancestry.com DNA LLC and Bank of
America, N.A. |
|||
31.1 | ** | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
||
31.2 | ** | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
||
32.1 | ** | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
||
101.INS | *** | XBRL Instance Document |
||
101.SCH | *** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
||
101.CAL | *** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
||
101.DEF | *** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
||
101.LAB | *** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
||
101.PRE | *** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
* | Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, filed on May 3, 2011 (File No. 001-34518). | |
** | These certifications are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference in any filing we make under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings. | |
*** | In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) documents are furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections. |
43