UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-Q

for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2020

or

for the transition period from                 

001-38627

(Commission File Number)

RIVERVIEW FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(717) 957-2196

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.    Yes ☐    No ☒

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 9,240,492 at April 29, 2020.

RIVERVIEW FINANCIAL CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2020

Riverview Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

Riverview Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS) AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Riverview Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

Riverview Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

Riverview Financial Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

1. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Nature of Operations

Riverview Financial Corporation, (the “Company” or “Riverview”), a bank holding company incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania, provides a full range of financial services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Riverview Bank (the “Bank”).

Riverview Bank, with twenty seven (27) full service offices and four (4) limited purpose offices, is a full service commercial bank offering a wide range of traditional banking services and financial advisory, insurance and investment services to individuals, municipalities and small-to-medium sized businesses in the Pennsylvania market areas of Berks, Blair, Bucks, Centre, Clearfield, Cumberland, Dauphin, Huntingdon, Lebanon, Lehigh, Lycoming, Perry, Schuylkill and Somerset Counties. The Wealth and Trust Management divisions of the Bank provide trust and investment advisory services to the general public and businesses.

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP’) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been included. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications did not have any effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Accordingly, these unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 16, 2020.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The operating results and financial position of the Company for the three months ended as of March 31, 2020, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations and financial position that may be expected in the future. This is especially true given the recent outbreak of the Coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic which may adversely affect the Company’s business results of operations and financial conditions for an indefinite period.

Beginning in the first quarter of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused disruption in economic and social activity, both globally and in the United States. The spread of COVID-19, and the related government actions to mandate or encourage quarantines and social distancing, have caused severe disruptions in the U.S. economy, which has and will likely continue to, in turn, disrupt the business, activities, and operations of our customers, as well as our own business and operations.

The national public health crisis arising from the COVID-19 pandemic and public expectations about it, combined with certain pre-existing factors, including, but not limited to, international trade disputes, inflation risks, and oil price volatility, could further destabilize the financial markets and the markets in which Riverview operates. The resulting impacts of the pandemic on consumers, including the sudden significant increase in the unemployment rate, is expected to cause changes in consumer and business spending, borrowing needs and saving habits, which will likely affect the demand for loans and other products and services Riverview offers, as well as the creditworthiness of potential and current borrowers. The significant decrease in commercial activity associated with the pandemic, both nationally and in Riverview’s markets, may cause customers, vendors, and counterparties to be unable to meet existing payment or other obligations to Riverview and the Bank.

Riverview’s business is dependent upon the willingness and ability of its customers to conduct banking and other financial transactions. Riverview expects the pandemic to limit, at least for a period of time, customer demand for many banking activities. Many companies and residents in our market area are subject to mandatory “non-essential business” shut-downs and “stay at home” orders, which have reduced banking activity across our market area. In response to these mandates, Riverview has temporarily limited most locations to drive-up and ATM services, with lobby access available by appointment only, reduced hours

7

of operation at some locations and encouraged our customers to use electronic banking platforms. We expect these measures to remain in place for an undetermined period of time. In addition, the use of quarantines and social distancing methods to curtail the spread of COVID-19—whether mandated by governmental authorities or recommended as a public health practice—may adversely affect Riverview’s operations as key personnel, employees and customers avoid physical interaction. The continued spread of COVID-19 could also negatively impact the business and operations of third-party service providers who perform critical services for Riverview’s business. It is not yet known what impact these operational changes may have on Riverview’s financial performance.

There continue to be broad concerns related to the potential effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Even after government mandated stay at home orders expire, the aftereffects of the pandemic may continue to have an adverse effect on, among other things, (i) our ability to attract customer deposits, (ii) the ability of our borrowers to satisfy their obligations to us, (iii) the demand for our loans or our other products and services and/or (iv) unemployment rates, financial markets, real estate markets or economic growth.

The outbreak of COVID-19 has significantly affected the financial markets and has resulted in a number of responses by the U.S. government, including a reduction in interest rates by the Federal Reserve. These reductions in interest rates, especially if prolonged, could adversely affect our net interest income, margins and our profitability.

The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the economy heighten the risks related to economic conditions in our market areas, interest rates, loan losses and reliance on our executives and third-party service providers. For example, borrower loan defaults that adversely affect Riverview’s earnings correlate with deteriorating economic conditions, which, in turn, may impact borrowers’ creditworthiness. If our borrowers are unable to meet their payment obligations to us, we will be required to increase our allowance for the losses through provisions for credit losses. In addition, loan programs adopted by the federal government, such as the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), while intended to lessen the impact of the pandemic on businesses, may result in a decreased demand for Riverview’s loan products.

The impact of the pandemic on Riverview’s financial results is evolving and uncertain. The Company expects Riverview’s net interest income and non-interest income to decline and credit-related losses to increase for an uncertain period given the decline in economic activity occurring due to the coronavirus and the actions by the Federal Reserve with respect to interest rates. We believe that we may experience a material adverse effect in our business, results of operations and financial condition as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic for an indefinite period. Material adverse impacts may include all or a combination of valuation impairments on Riverview’s intangible assets, investments, loans or deferred taxes.

As of the March 31, 2020, the Company does not believe there exists any impairment to our goodwill, intangible assets, long-lived assets, right of use assets, or available-for-sale investment securities due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company assessed goodwill and concluded there was no impairment present based on the results of a qualitative test as of March 31, 2020. It is uncertain whether prolonged effects of the COVID-19 pandemic will result in future impairment charges related to any of the aforementioned assets.

Accounting Standards Adopted in 2020

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. The update addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This accounting guidance became effective on January 1, 2020. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”. The ASU simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill and eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The Company should perform its goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The impairment charge is limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The adoption of the new guidance on January 1, 2020 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement”. The amendments in this Update improve the effectiveness of fair value measurement disclosures by modifying the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value

8

Measurement, based on the concepts in FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting—Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The ASU became effective on January 1, 2020. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract”. This guidance aligns the accounting for implementation costs related to a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the guidance on capitalizing costs associated with developing or obtaining internal-use software. Common examples of hosting arrangements include software as a service, platform or infrastructure as a service and other similar types of hosting arrangements. While capitalized costs related to internal-use software is generally considered an intangible asset, costs incurred to implement a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract would typically be characterized in the company’s financial statements in the same manner as other service costs (e.g., prepaid expense). The new guidance provides that an entity would be required to amortize capitalized implementation costs over the term of the hosting arrangement on a straight-line basis unless another systematic and rational basis is more representative of the pattern in which the entity expects to benefit from access to the hosted software. This update became effective on January 1, 2020. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

Recent Accounting Standards

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”. ASU No. 2016-13 requires an entity to utilize a new impairment model known as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model to estimate its lifetime “expected credit loss” and record an allowance that, when deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset, presents the net amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The CECL model is expected to result in earlier recognition of credit losses. ASU No. 2016-13 also requires new disclosures for financial assets measured at amortized cost, loans and available-for-sale debt securities. In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-19—Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses. The amendments clarify that receivables arising from operating leases are not within the scope of Subtopic 326-20. Instead, impairment of receivables arising from operating leases should be accounted for in accordance with Topic 842, Leases. In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-05 “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326)-Targeted Transition Relief” which amends ASU No. 2016-13 to allow companies to irrevocably elect, upon adoption of ASU No, 2016-13, the fair value option on financial instruments that were previously recorded at amortized cost and are within the scope of ASC 326-20 if the instruments are eligible for the fair value option under ASC 825-10. The fair value option election does not apply to held-to-maturity debt securities. Entities are required to make this election on an instrument-by-instrument basis. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-11, “Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses”, which provides specific improvements and clarifications to the guidance in Topic 326. Addresses expected recoveries for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration, transition relief for troubled debt restructurings, disclosures related to accrued interest receivables, financial assets secured by collateral maintenance provisions, and conforming cross-references to Subtopic 805-20. In December 2018, the federal bank regulatory agencies approved a final rule that modifies their regulatory capital rules and provides institutions the option to phase in over a three-year period any day-one regulatory capital effects of the new accounting standard. The Company has formed an internal management committee and engaged a third-party vendor to assist with the transition to the guidance set forth in this update. The committee is currently evaluating the impact of this update on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, but the ALLL is expected to increase upon adoption since the allowance will be required to cover the full expected life of the portfolio. The extent of this increase is still being evaluated and will depend on economic conditions and the composition of the loan and lease portfolio at the time of adoption. Management is currently evaluating the preliminary modeling results, including a qualitative framework to account for the drivers of credit losses that are not captured by the quantitative model. In October 2019, the FASB affirmed its previously proposed amendment to delay the effective date for small reporting public companies to interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company currently expects as of January 1, 2023 to recognize a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to increase the ALLL with an offsetting reduction to the retained earnings component of equity.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Subtopic 715-20)—Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans”. Subtopic 715-20 addresses the disclosure of other accounting and reporting requirements related to single-employer defined benefit pension or other postretirement benefit plans. The amendments in this Update remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost-beneficial, clarify the specific requirements of disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. Although narrow in scope, the amendments are considered an important part of the Board’s efforts to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to financial statements by applying concepts in the FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting—Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements. The amendments in this Update apply to all employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The ASU is effective for all entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of the new guidance is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

9

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, “Income Taxes”, an update to simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions in Topic 740 Income Taxes. In addition, ASU No. 2019-12 improves consistent application of other areas of guidance within Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. The new guidance is effective fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The adoption of the new guidance is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or disclosures.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)”. In response to concerns about structural risks of interbank offered rates (“IBORs”), and, particularly, the risk of cessation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), regulators around the world have undertaken reference rate reform initiatives to identify alternative reference rates that are more observable or transaction-based and less susceptible to manipulation. The amendments in this Update provide optional guidance for a limited time to ease the potential burden in accounting for or recognizing the effects of reference rate reform on financial reporting. ASU 2020-04 provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to loan and lease agreements, derivative contracts, and other transactions affected by the anticipated transition away from LIBOR toward new interest rate benchmarks. For transactions that are modified because of reference rate reform and that meet certain scope guidance (i) modifications of loan agreements should be accounted for by prospectively adjusting the effective interest rate and the modification will be considered “minor” so that any existing unamortized origination fees/costs would carry forward and continue to be amortized and (ii) modifications of lease agreements should be accounted for as a continuation of the existing agreement with no reassessments of the lease classification and the discount rate or remeasurements of lease payments that otherwise would be required for modifications not accounted for as separate contracts. ASU 2020-04 also provides numerous optional expedients for derivative accounting. ASU 2020-04 is effective March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. An entity may elect to apply ASU 2020-04 for contract modifications as of January 1, 2020, or prospectively from a date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, up to the date that the financial statements are available to be issued. Once elected for a Topic or an Industry Subtopic within the Codification, the amendments in this ASU must be applied prospectively for all eligible contract modifications for that Topic or Industry Subtopic. We are evaluating the impacts of this ASU and have not yet determined whether LIBOR transition and this ASU will have a material effect on our business operations and consolidated financial statements.

2. Other comprehensive income (loss):

The components of other comprehensive income (loss) and their related tax effects are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets relates to net unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available-for-sale and benefit plan adjustments.

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 is as follows:

10

Other comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 is as follows:

3. Earnings per share:

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. The following table provides a reconciliation between the computation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019:

For the three months ended March 31, 2020, there were 37,200 outstanding stock options that were excluded from the dilutive earnings per share calculation because their effect was antidilutive. None of the outstanding stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2019 were included in the diluted earnings per share calculation because the Company recognized a net loss for the quarter.

4. Investment securities:

The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available-for-sale aggregated by investment category at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are summarized as follows:

11

The maturity distribution of the fair value, which is the net carrying amount, of the debt securities classified as available-for-sale at March 31, 2020, is summarized as follows:

Securities with a fair value of $46,152 and $63,389 at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits as required or permitted by law.

Securities and short-term investment activities are conducted with a diverse group of government entities, corporations and state and local municipalities. The counterparty’s creditworthiness and type of collateral is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, there were no significant concentrations of credit risk from any one issuer, with the exception of U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises that exceeded 10.0 percent of stockholders’ equity.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities with unrealized losses for which an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) has not been recognized at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are summarized as follows:

12

The Company had 10 investment securities, consisting of two taxable state and municipal obligations, seven mortgage-backed securities, and one corporate debt obligation that were in unrealized loss positions at March 31, 2020. Of these securities, one corporate debt obligation was in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more. Management does not consider the unrealized losses on the debt securities resulting from changes in interest rates to be OTTI based on historical evidence that indicates the cost of these securities is recoverable within a reasonable period of time in relation to normal cyclical changes in the market rates of interest. Moreover, because there has been no material change in the credit quality of the issuers or other events or circumstances that may cause a significant adverse impact on the fair value of these securities, and management does not intend to sell these securities and it is unlikely that the Company will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider the unrealized losses to be OTTI at March 31, 2020. There was no OTTI recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.

The Company had 22 investment securities, consisting of two taxable state and municipal obligations, 19 mortgage-backed securities and one corporate obligation that were in unrealized loss positions at December 31, 2019. Of these securities, four mortgage-backed securities and one corporate obligation were in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more.

5. Loans, net and allowance for loan losses:

The major classifications of loans outstanding, net of deferred loan origination fees and costs at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are summarized as follows. Net deferred loan costs were $885 and $1,129 at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

The change in the allowance for loan losses account by major loan classifications for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 is summarized as follows:

13

The allocation of the allowance for loan losses and the related loans by major classifications of loans at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 is summarized as follows:

14

The Company segments loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. Loans are individually analyzed for credit risk by classifying them within the Company’s internal risk rating system. The Company’s risk rating classifications are defined as follows:

15

The following tables present the major classification of loans summarized by the aggregate pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention, substandard and doubtful within the Company’s internal risk rating system at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019: